Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL10-027 - NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP / SHASTA BEVERAGES - DESIGN REVIEW AND SEPASHASTA BEVERAGES 1227 ANDOVER PARK E PL1O-027 Li 0-030 El 0-012 DESIGN REVIEW & SEPA City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Craft Architects, Applicant National Beverage, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology June 25, 2010 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L10-030 Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Type of Permit Applied for: Public Hearing Design Review Project Description: Construction of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete additional to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage products. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. Location: 1227 Andover Park East Associated Files: E10-012 (SEPA) Environmental Review Comprehensive Plan Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Designation/Zoning District: II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) using the optional DNS process. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City's Board of Architectural Review determined that the application for a DESIGN REVIEW does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 1 of 3 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\Design Revew\Notice of Decision, 2010.06.25.doc 06/25/2010 11:13:00 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 o Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206-431-3670 o Fax: 206-431-3665 i • that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the proposed addition, the proposed landscaping plan shall receive final approval from the City's Urban Environmentalist who shall have the authority to make changes on spacing and species selection shown in the landscaping plan. 2. The existing freestanding sign shall be painted colors to match the color scheme of the finished building. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed addition, the applicant shall submit color renderings of the proposed sign to be approved by the City. 3. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the proposed addition, the applicant shall provide details on the furniture to be placed within the employee outdoor activity area. The proposed furniture shall have colors that are consistent with the design of the building and shall be all weather. 4. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the City Council of the Board of Architectural Review Decision is permitted. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by July 16, 2010. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) ' BM Page 2 of 3 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\Design Revew\Notice of Decision, 2010.06.25.doc 06/25/2010 11:13:00 AM 1 • 5. Appeal fee based on current fee schedule. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS The City Council hearing regarding the appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The City Council decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the City Council decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the City Council decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 or at bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us for further information. Property owners affected by his decision ma request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Cor aeHfte ing Co i r.�iT -ssor s Office for fort er m motion regarding property tax valuation changes. Brandon J. Isles, Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 3 of 3 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\Design Revew\Notice of Decision, 2010.06.25.doc 06/25/2010 11:13:00 AM City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONTACT: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared June 14, 2010 June 24, 2010 Notice of Application was distributed to adjacent property owners and tenants; local agencies; and posted on site on June 2, 2010. Notice of Public Hearing was distributed to adjacent property owners and tenants on June 8, 2010. Notice was also published in the Seattle Times on June 9, 2010. L10-030 E10-012 SEPA File (Environmental Review) Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage has filed applications for development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. 1227 Andover Park East, King County Parcel #352304-9072 Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Optional Determination of Non -significance issued June 17, 2010. Approval with Conditions Brandon Miles, Senior Planner BM Page 1 of 15 C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS--1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 ATTACHMENTS: A. Aerial Photo of Project Site B. Sheet A1.1, Proposed Site Plan C. Sheet A4.1, Proposed Elevations D. Sheet L-1, Proposed Landscaping Plan E. Site Lighting Plan F. Applicant's Response to Design Review Narrative BM Page 2 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1 \Teri -S \LOCALS -1 \Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc Vicinity/Site Information A. Project Description: B. FINDINGS The applicant is proposing to construct a 43,000 square foot addition to their existing property located at 1227 Andover Park East. The proposed addition will be constructed to the north of the existing building on the site. The proposed addition will be utilized for warehouse and distribution of beverage projects; both uses are permitted uses within the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). New parking will be added between the proposed addition and Andover Park East. New landscaping is also proposed along the front (east property line) near Andover Park East and the north property line. A 20 -foot access road will be constructed along the north property line, between the building and the proposed landscaping. This access road will serve as fire access and will provide access to the rear of the site. Proposed Building Area Existing Development: Project Site The project site is approximately 4.17 acres in area and accordingly to the City's Sensitive Area Maps, the site contains no sensitive areas (shorelines, wetlands, associated buffers, or steep slopes). The existing building on the site was constructed in 1967 and has been in continuous use by Shasta Beverage since construction. When the building was constructed there were plans for a future addition and pre -load was placed on the site in order to accommodate the future addition. BM Page 3 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc Parking on the site is currently located in two places on the site: 1) the first area is between the existing building and Andover Park East 2) along the south property line. There is some unofficial parking stalls also located along the south property line. There are three existing access points from the property to Andover Park East. The southern access point is mainly intended for employee access. The remaining two access points provide semi -truck access to the truck court yard located in the front of the building. Existing Building Existing Parking on south property line C. Surrounding Land Use: Existing Truck Court The project site is located in an area of the TUC dominated by warehouse/light industrial uses. A furniture store with warehouse is located directed to the north of the property; small Tight industrial uses are located to the south and west of the property. Also, located to the west of the property is a railroad spur line which provides railroad access BM Page 4 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUM&-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc to the applicant's building. The project site is bordered by Andover Park East directly to the east. Building Located Across the Street Building Located to the south D. Terrain: Building Located to the north The project site is located in the valley floor of the Green River and thus is largely flat. The maximum grade on the site is 13%; however this is an artificial slope which is provided at the truck court. BM Page 5 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME—l\Teri-S\LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc E. Vegetation: As noted, the addition area was prepared with pre -load when the building was originally constructed in 1967. The addition area currently contains grass and other similar type vegetation. A small cottonwood is also located in the addition area and is currently proposed to be removed. A small amount of perimeter landscaping is located along the sidewalk adjacent to Andover Park East. Building perimeter landscaping is also located adjacent to the entry for the existing building on the site. Existing Front Landscaping F. Access: Vehicular access to the site is from three access points along Andover Park East. The site also utilizes a railroad spur to the west of the property. BACKGROUND SEPA for the proposed building was issued on June 7, 2010. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BAR) CRITERIA STANDARD OF REVIEW. Design review is required for all structures in the Tukwila Urban Center zone that are larger than 1,500 square feet. The BAR shall limit its review to the criteria found in TMC 18.60. The proposed use for the addition is permitted outright by TMC 18.28 and the BAR has no authority on the proposed use or other operational issues. In the following discussion, the BAR criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. The applicant's responses to the BAR criteria are found in Attachment F. BM Page 6 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Response: The project is an addition to an existing building and use currently located on the site. The proposed addition will be located directly adjacent to the existing building which will create a uniform building line along the front of the property. The building is setback approximately 165 feet from Andover Park West. Parking and truck access are located between the building and Andover Park West. Given that this is an addition to an existing building on the site, locating the service area or parking areas on the side or rear of the building would be problematic for truck maneuverability, instead the applicant is proposing Type II landscaping along the front of the property to assist in screening the parking and truck loading areas (See Attachment B). The existing building on the site is approximately 27 feet tall at its highest point. As the existing front elevation moves north the height of the building drops down several feet. The proposed addition will be 27 feet tall at its highest elevation which will give the appearance that it is slight taller than much of the elevation along the front. The proposed addition's rear elevation (west elevation) will be slightly taller than the existing building. Along the side elevation (north elevation) the elevation's height will vary from 27 feet towards the front; to 25 feet in the middle; with the existing building towards the rear having an elevation of 27 feet (See Attachment C). The height of surrounding buildings adjacent to the proposed project site and within the general vicinity are not known; however a visual observation of the height of existing buildings in the area indicates that 27 feet is consistent with the adjacent buildings. The maximum permitted height within the TUC is 115 feet'. 2. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining area. A. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character; D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. ' TMC 18.28.080 BM Page 7 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc Response: The proposed project brings building features from the existing building into the new addition. As noted, the existing building on the site was constructed in 1967. The other buildings in the area were constructed around the same time as the project building. The existing building is painted tilt up concrete and the new building will also be tilt up concrete. Canopies that are consistent with the canopies on the existing building will be used on the building. These canopies are located in the center of the building's elevation and assist in providing modulation and articulation to the facade (See Attachment C). On the existing building there is a large vertical element that utilizes exposed aggregate concrete. This vertical element also includes plasters which add vertical modulation to the existing building. A vertical element is also being added with the proposed addition to assist in providing modulation and to assist in providing a transition between the existing building and the proposed addition (See Attachment C). The entire building, both existing and the proposed addition, will utilize a two earth tone colors (See Attachment C). Perimeter landscaping is also being added in the front of the proposed addition. This landscaping will also assist in break up the mass of the proposed addition (See Attachment D). The landscaping provisions found in TMC 18.52 do not require any side or rear landscaping for the proposed use. The applicant has proposed to install a small strip of landscaping on the south property line, adjacent to the existing furniture store/warehouse. The proposed use manufactures and distributes beverage products throughoutthe region. Located in the front of the building are seven loading bays, included with the addition an additional three loading bays. All the loading bays are located in the front of the building and there is an existing semi -truck courtyard located in the front of the building. The proposed layout attempts to separate truck maneuvering from automobile parking and pedestrian circulation. Parking areas are located along the north and south portions of the property. Access to these two parking areas is from existing, designated curb cuts from Andover Park East. The truck courtyard is located directly between the two parking areas. Each of the parking areas has the ability to access the building directly, without having to cross the truck courtyard. An existing sidewalk is located along Andover Park East. Pedestrian connections to adjacent properties can be achieved from this existing sidewalk. The proposed development does not propose to provide direct pedestrian access to adjacent properties. BM Page 8 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Response: The existing site is flat and featureless, thus incorporated the existing site topography into the site design cannot occur. The grade on the site, for the parking lot, adjacent sidewalks, and landscaping areas will be flat. Much of the landscaping on the site is currently non -conforming to the City's current landscaping standards. Under TMC 18.70.090 the City has the authority to require that the site's landscaping come into conformance with the City's landscaping requirements; however TMC 18.70.090 (B) allows the BAR to waive and/or modify certain landscaping requirements: "The BAR may modify the standards imposed by this title when, in their judgment, strict compliance with the landscaping standards of this code would create substantial practical difficulties, the existing and proposed additional landscaping and screening materials together will adequately careen or buffer possible use incompatibilities, soften the barren appearance of parking or storage areas, and/or adequately enhance the premises appropriate to the use district and location of the site". Perimeter Landscaping A non -conforming landscaping strip with existing trees, shrubs, and ground covers is located in front of the property along Andover Park East. The landscaping plan, sheet L- 1 Attachment D, illustrates the proposed landscaping for the project site. The TUC BM Page 9 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc district requires 15 feet of landscaping along Andover Park East2 and since the applicant is proposing loading and delivery bays in the front of the building the required landscaping for the project is increased from Type I landscaping to Type II landscaping. The current landscaping in the front of the property does not comply with the minimum width requirements in the TUC (See Attachment D). Existing Front Landscaping The applicant is proposing to retain the existing six inch caliper Tulip trees found in the perimeter landscaping. A total of eight new Pine trees will be planted in the front perimeter landscaping. The proposed number of trees, 14, complies with the requirements for Type II landscaping which requires one tree for every 20 feet of lineal frontage. The applicant is also proposing to remove the existing English Ivy found in the area and replace it with more appropriate shrubs and ground cover. Under the Type II landscaping requirements the applicant is required to plant one shrub for every five feet of lineal frontage (excluding curb cuts) and have ground cover that will achieve 90 percent coverage within three years. The applicant has proposed shrub spacing that exceeds the City requirements. Groundcover is proposed with a spacing ranging from 18" on center to 24" on center .(See Attachment D). Parking Lot Landscaping The parking lot landscaping on the site currently does not comply with TMC 18.52. Under TMC 18.52.035 parking lots must meet the following landscaping standards: 1. Interior landscape islands shall be placed at the ends of each interior row in the parking area with no stall more than 10 stalls or 100 feet from a landscape area; 2 TMC 18.52.020 BM Page 10 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\D000ME--1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc 2. The minimum size for interior parking lot planning islands is 100 square feet; 3. Planting islands shall be a minimum of 6 feet in any direction and generally the length of the adjacent parking space; and 4. A minimum of one evergreen or deciduous tree is required per landscape island with the remaining area to contain a combination of shrubs, living ground cover and mulch. The proposed, new parking areas will comply with the above requirements. The applicant has proposed to plant Maple trees and utilize a variety of shrubs and groundcover within the new parking area. As previously discussed, there is an existing parking area located on the south property line that will remain as part of this project. The applicant has proposed to not do any landscaping improvements to this parking area (See Attachment D). Additional Landscaping While not required by code, the applicant is proposing a three foot landscaping strip along the north property line. This area is too small for trees and the applicant is proposing to plant beach strawberry, a groundcover, in this area. Located in the front of the existing building, near the entrance, is a Targe landscaping area of mature trees. This is proposed to be retained as part of the project. The applicant is also proposing additional perimeter landscaping in the front of the new building. This proposed landscaping will include Pine trees and a variety of shrubs and groundcover. Building perimeter landscaping is not required in the TUC (See Attachment D). Additional landscaping is also proposed in the northwest portion of the site. This landscaping will be incorporated into the employee outdoor activity area. This landscaping is not required by Code. There is currently a significant amount of outdoor storage occurring on the site. The applicant has noted that one of the reasons for the proposed addition is to do away with outdoor storage and store everything indoors. No outdoor storage of materials will occur upon completion of the project. The existing trash enclosure is located on the south property line and will remain after completion of this project. Minimal outdoor lighting is proposed and will include only building lighting. The applicant has noted that the proposed lights will match the lighting on the existing building and that the proposed lighting meets the Engineering Societies recommendations for lighting. Attachment E shows the proposed lighting plan for the project site. BM Page 11 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc 4. Building Design. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportion and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; D. Colors should be harmonious with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest; Response: The proposed project brings building features from the existing building into the new addition. As noted, the existing building on the site was constructed in 1967. The existing building is painted tilt up concrete and the new building will also be tilt up concrete. Canopies that are consistent with the canopies on the existing building will be used on the building. These canopies are located in the center of the building's elevation and assist in breaking thefacade of the building (See Attachment C). On the existing building there is a large vertical element that utilizes exposed aggregate concrete. This vertical element also includes pilasters which add vertical modulation to the existing building. A vertical element is also being added with the proposed addition to assist in providing modulation and to assist in providing a transition between the existing building and the proposed addition (See Attachment C). The entire building, both existing and the proposed addition, will utilize two earth tone colors. Foundation landscaping is also being added in the front of the proposed addition. This landscaping will also assist in break up the mass of the proposed addition (See Attachment D). No new mechanical equipment is proposed with the new addition. The mechanical screening on the existing building consists of wood slats and does not appear to be consistent with the design of the existing building or the proposed addition (See Attachment C). BM Page 12 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc Existing Mechanical Equipment Screening No new outdoor storage is proposed with the proposed project. 5. Miscellaneous structures and Street Furniture. A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape; B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Response: While not required by Code, the applicant is proposing an employee outdoor seating area in the northwest portion of the building. The area will include a large asphalt recreation area, outdoor seating and landscaping. The applicant has not provided any details on the furniture that is being proposed within this area (See Attachment B). The applicant is proposing one new building mounted sign on the property but has not proposed to replace the existing freestanding sign on the property. The existing freestanding sign on the property utilizes white letters on a light blue background. BM Page 13 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME--1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc CONCLUSIONS 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: The new structure is similar in height to the buildings already located in this area of the TUC zone. Given that this is an addition to an existing building it is not possible to locate the loading bays or parking areas behind the building, instead the applicant makes good use of landscaping to break up the parking area and to reduce the overall mass of the building. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area: The site is located in an area zoned for a variety of uses. The main building material, tilt up concrete, matches the material of the existing building and is consistent with the other buildings in the area. Pedestrian circulation is provided by Andover Park East. Direct pedestrian access to adjacent properties is not provided nor is it appropriate given that the existing use on the site or adjacent uses do not support pedestrian activities (light industrial and furniture retail/warehousing). The proposed site plan will separate out automobile parking from the building's truck courtyard, this should assist in reducing conflicts between pedestrians and semi -trucks. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: The site does not comply with the City's current landscaping requirements, given that this is an addition to an existing building it would seem prudent to allow some modifications to the City's required landscaping standards. The applicant is proposing to retain and enhance the existing, substandard perimeter landscaping along Andover Park East. Requiring that this area be expanded to meet the minimum width requirement of 15 feet would seem impractical given that the mature trees would likely have to be removed. Although the landscape area does not meet the minimum width requirements the plant materials exceed the City's Type II landscaping requirements. Requiring that the existing parking area comply with the City's minimum landscaping requirements should also be waived. The applicant is not proposing any site work along the south property line and it would seem impractical to ask the applicant to cut up asphalt to add landscaping and irrigation when no additional site work is proposed within this area. In lieu of improving the frontage landscaping and parking lot landscaping, the applicant has proposed to install foundation landscaping along the building and to install a small landscaping area along the north property line. The building perimeter landscaping will also assist in breaking up the mass of the proposed new addition. BM Page 14 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM C:\DOCUME--I \Teri-S\LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc 4. Building Design: The elevation, materials and finishes of the new addition are consistent with the existing building design. The proposed addition will utilize concrete tilt up as the main material. Vertical lines will be used on the addition to link the new addition to the existing building. Also, matching canopies will be used on both the new building and the addition to further blend the two parts of the building into one building. Lighting on the site is adequate for the proposed use. The color scheme is harmonious with surrounding buildings with no brilliant or garish colors being used. The existing mechanical equipment screening is not consistent with the design of the existing building. Given that the finished building will be concrete the use of wood screening is out of place. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: An outdoor recreation area is provided as an amenity to the employees of the site However, the applicant has not provided any details about the furniture within this seating area. The existing colors of the freestanding sign on the property will not be consistent with the proposed new colors of the finished building. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the design of the Shasta Beverage Addition and the landscaping plans with the following conditions: 1. The existing freestanding sign shall be painted to match the color scheme of the finished building. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed addition, the applicant shall submit color renderings of the proposed sign to be approved by the City. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the proposed addition, the applicant shall provide details on the furniture to be placed within the employee outdoor activity area. The proposed furniture shall have colors that are consistent with the design of the building and shall be suitable for all weather conditions. 3. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. 4. The applicant shall replace the existing mechanical screening with a design that is more consistent with the overall design and appearance of the finished building. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate the proposed screening for the mechanical equipment which shall be approved by the Director. BM Page 15 of 15 06/16/2010 5:56:00 PM CADOCUME-1\Teri-S\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc ir at* of .Jtd wiea IP Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Number: L10-030 Mailing requested by: Bra don iles - Notice of Public Hearing Mailer's signature: / (,t 0 (I Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 x Other: Notice of Decision Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _25 day of _June in the year 2010 r WA DEPT OF ECOLOGY K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE - SEPA REVIEW SECTION ACCOUNTING DIVISION PO BOX 47703500 4TH AVE - RM 709A - OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7703 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Project Name: Craft Architects/Shasta addition Project Number: L10-030 Mailing requested by: Bra don iles - - 4 & Mailer's signature: / (,t 0 (I I' W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DO v- Majestic NW Landscaping LLC City of Tukwila RrvED Planning Department CITYOFT Kwi LOCT .0 .4 all RE: Shasta Beverage Company 1227 Andover Park East PERMIT CENTER Tukwila WA 98188 ATTN: Minnie Dhaliwal As per your request please find attached two copies of our Red Line As -Built for the Landscaping of the Shasta Beverage Co. As we discussed, there have been some changes made throughout the planting phase of the project. These changes were a result of the owner and the Landscape contractor collaborating in a few specific areas to increase the effectiveness of said project. As you can see from the As -Built drawing some of the changes were implemented to create visual barriers for the Semi -Truck Drivers to see easier. This has already aided in fewer trucks driving over the planting beds. The other changes were either in areas that were not with in the original scope of work or to areas that the owner wished to enhance with more color and splash. Throughout the entire project, the planting's, topsoil and other materials have either met or exceeded what was originally proposed. We hope that these changes have not caused you any alarm and would appreciate your approval to date. In the future the owner wishes for us to maintain the entire project and to enhance the seasonal color on a regular basis. Should you have any further questions or concerns we may always be reached by the contact information below. For all or your time and effort regarding our request, we wish to thank you in advance. Sincerely, Steve ro Majestic an • ing LLC 800-669-6750 PO Box 14832 brombie@aol.com Mill Creek WA 98082 De °Me PI. 6 PLANT SCHEDULE A5 14 SYNBOL EA -TE WSctat•Q pA MAP i MA 1+1Al CtsTU$ 'LI L.Lys 136g KtY TAPbAfICA p1<kis L.IL y�. I:A�Sf• +PINES TO PLAN • RI+ODI5 ••• 60I -D ,UY DN QI�►oV� • V 16uzni oAA DAVLb41 PROPOSED BUILDING. ADDITION 511NG.18' COTTONW00d10 8E REMOMD:' QTY. BOTANICAL NAME /'COMMON NAME 1 DECiDuOUS TREES _ ACER. X FREELAIIO '.EFTERSRED / AUTUMN BLAZE, MAPLE CARPINUS BEIULUS TASTIGIA.TA'/ HORNBEAM. EVERGI�iIN TREES ' PINUS 'naps vANOfRwalF'S /'VANDERWULF'S PINE EVFRGtEFL SFENBS' asius x pURPURalS./ oftilitapsE"^. . -MAMMA A ADUIFODUM: 'C011PACTA':: / OREGON. GRAFtf .' 98 PRUNUS L 'OTTO WYKD(/ 0TT0' WYKEN LAUREL -TAXUS 6 MEDIA' HICKSIF / 160(5 YEW OEaoUaNS SWIM . 21 BERBERS THUNBERGII 'ROSE GLOW /_BARBERRY • 6 PHYSOCARWIS-aUUFODUS''tlA80L0`/ N!N98MIX 34 SPIRAEA JAPONICA'MAGIC CARPET' /. 'IREA /PEREtONALS /GRASSES • : 3 EuPNceei6 .CHARAaAs lunar./ EUPHORSA: 104' HFLCroRBCNON SENPERVIRENS -/`•BLWE OAT a;RAt; .. 5 2 •11 27. .55' 47_ 680 . ARCTOSTAPHYLOS.UVA-UR9 / KUINIIGNP* ( 95S_}RAGAPoA,a_wass / BEACH STRAWBERRY PRUNUS L LOUNT: VERNON' / MOUNT VERNON LAUREL 150 L4N,LEGEND LS •TREE TYPE s i%CAUP0 0811' , 71 tAJ 1 rVVoLLb YbISTING 1REEs'TO kEMF6i_ _- 4L1" T. TULIP TEE BEQK Tom._ til y �- -: mEEs TO BE REMOVED: `. G.. TTONW000'. NEIDHERS/ GRANITE (REFER TO N01E 113) CZ) ; EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO FOAM. - - LANDSCAPE.:ht6TES ' SZE r CAL 2' CAL 12 HT. MIN. 18' HT. MUL 18' HT. MIN. TIT HT. YIIL 4' HT. LIN: 18' NT. MIN. I8" HT. MR1 18' HT. LTA. .1. GAL 4' POT `4'POT 1 GAL_ NOTES. BBB B&B CONT., 4' 0.G CONT, r QG CONT.. S QC. 888 4' 0.C. CONT. 3'_.0.C. CONT: CONT. CONT., r O.G 18' 0.G 18. 0.G 24' ac' -a r c h i t, e.c is .'2505 Th1ra Avenue Suite 324 .Seattle: WA 99121,. .:206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 fax www.craftarchltects.com 1.: LANDSCAPE C81I1RACTGR.TO CLEAR -OM (8118 411 EXISTING -ALONG - ANDOVER PARK FAST, REMOVING IVY. CARE -TO -BE TAXEN-NOY70 BMACE TREE ROOM 2AL1,N6w LANQSCAPE AREAFADJACFNT TO BUILDINGS AND: LW1111N PARXI4G LOT TO 8E SET ATV MUM F9ISWELEVARON D(CWT AS"R01m.. THESE AREAS TO REJMPORIED,3-wAY.TCRSO1 TO A LONIMUM.DEPTH OF 12'. SUBGRADE To BE SCAR0TED' TD A DEPIH'Oi 12 -Ir Mm AU. SP= (Rock a 000185 > r-ObC7 T0.8E.ROMEO PPoOR•'R1.INSTAIT 1181 F-NEW.IDQSOg, WSTALL PAOFIGxescLS - PINTER 181'PINTWO LIFTS ae:6' FACN.'R0T0T01 EACH UPTao;A.DEPiwCf 8' INTO SIIBCRADE.'..ALL EXISTING BEDS THAT ARE SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW PLANTING -TO HAR-EXISIINGNY'RELOVED BY HAND 111H CARE NOT TO DAMAGE 1980 ROOTS. Vona lax TO -BE ADDED TO A r DEPTH, 41EPIAaNG 5011, OVFD LWTH M. ..MINTER MIX TO CONSIST ST 7 1/3 BY-VOWME SANDY LOAM 8Y MUNE CCMPOSFFD ut 44LLLrAAMEN�1/3 FORBER11LITY'YVND WL AVOLUME OlINSE s WASHED' 8Y ABMIX TO BE MT SaLS TEST PROWDED:BY Sal AND PUNT LABORATORY FOR NEW PLANTING. (Sal. AND PLANT LAEU RAIDEL _IK.:425-746-6665, TEST /A05-2). asir s .ALL NEW PLANTING -BEDS TO HAVE FINE:BARK-MULa1.TO A MINIMUM S5. DEPTH OF r.- EXISTING BEDS' To BE MULCHED AS -NOTED: • ' 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL.}1AS BEEN BETEG 318'BrOROLIGHT TOLERANT. • _CANDSCAPE.CONTRACTOr-TO 8E RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WATERING S-RE0J_IRE3 BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE ff. WORT( -8Y OWNER S' GROUND'COVER TO E7(TF2a) UNDER'ALL 0Ea0UOUS.T0E CANOPIES..A7 THE SPECIFIED SPACING 10 PROVIDE "COMPLETE :COVERAGE IN ALLPLANTING::r t b11a: DEXGIATED ro wax GR0uN0=C0VFR :- f f!1 2 BFNEAT sir to LUy KENS TREES 1O BE MARRA9a'.'A 3' a tAN9E.'FRINI : •r-; :TRURO(• 6. LANDSCAPE -DRAWING} `Aa1E BA,SE}) FIHESIIE • .,:.,PREP CRAFT ARUU1ECTS'WYE1xATElY AO1W1f: 9. .LEC%QF Sbh-501J4L ANY FIE1D aUHGS"T0 TiE'91E PUMAS 0a1 MAY'REWIRr G O L O - ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN. _ y:. 7.. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS EOR: (BLOW. AND 01 IAM r. INFORMATION. IWIEPIATELY NOTINY-LpMMSCAPE *0 CT OF. ANY AD AA A. . az.NIA 0R6Z HACONDITIONS. WHICH witAFTEOT THE I" OF PLANT MA 8. NO PRE -EMERGENT 114R31a7OE5 r:E1E;,USED ON =91E • 0. 811 .1HE FIRST3V AR 9. B' &13 PLANTS MIA DUG CONFIRMATION FROM' -NURSERY 10. LANDSCAPE ARCHRECT 10 : a km APPROVE Ppm TO PLANTING TD ENSURE rACCEPTABLE' OUAU 11. 8Uf8.AP TO ecookiPLE1LY RELOVEDFR014 ALL B &.8PUNT MATERIAL. BEFORE BACI0ILLDIG Cf PLANTING::. • . • 12. AEI.' NEW LANDSCAPE PLANTING • TO' BE IRRIGATED WITH. A COMPLETELY AUTOLIAIlb 6L+S1 1)Ar1. 13. W6H CASCADES GRANITE BOULDERS r0 BE PLACED_ *PLANTING PLANTNG.BEDS AS Ii61EkN BOULDERS TO BE SET INTO THE SUNNI AND P09118400 THAT ALL ETO'05YD SDES3 PINE '0f 1HE BOULDER SLOPES 0011 AND AWAY FROM 1110 CEN1ER ff BW ,4 L • 7 ! 1IGHCWASHINGTON. PHONE: (442 2-3313SCADES GRANITE ARE AVAILABLE AT ). PROVIDE AJOYS A Y�(5) 3 MAN 6eIQRLS AND ION. (9) 2;MAN ROCK. September 16, 2011 City of Tukwila Jitn Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Puce, Director CHRIS MASTRUP 880 N WRIGHT RD SANTA ROSA CA 95407 4\14 RE: Blue Star Gas, Unclassified Use Notice of Public Hearing, PL11-034 10802 East Marginal Way S, Tukwila WA Dear Chris Mastrup: / There is a fee due on your permit application in the amount of $55.00 to cover fees associated with mailing the attached public notice. The number of required notices sent for your application was 55 which included property owners and tenants within 500 feet of your project site as well as interested parties and agencies with jurisdiction. The cost is based on the land use fee schedule adopted by Resolution Number 1718 covering Public Notice mailings required for your application. This fee covers the attached notice only. Additional fees may be assessed for future mailings or other review tasks per the fee schedule. This amount needs to be paid before the city can continue processing your permit application. The payment may be paid by cash, check or credit card. The city will accept credit card payments by phone. If paying by check please send the check made out to: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 206 431 3670. Sincerely, Teri Svedahl Administrative Support Technician Cc; Brandon Miles, Senior Planner MD Invoicing Public Mailings.doc Page 1 of 1 09/13/2011 6300 Southcenter Boulevard,, Suite 11100 • Tukwila, Washington 9S1SS • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 • • TO: Shasta Beverage File (L10-030)�j 1 FROM: Brandon Miles, Senior Planne RE: Design Review Conditions DATE: August 9, 2010 The above project received BAR approval in May of 2010. As part of the approval the BAR placed the following conditions: 1. The existing freestanding sign shall be painted colors to match the color scheme of the finished building. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed addition, the applicant shall submit color renderings of the proposed sign to be approved by the City. 2. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the proposed addition, the applicant shall provide details on the furniture to be placed within the employee outdoor activity area. The proposed furniture shall have colors that are consistent with the design of the building and shall be all weather. 3. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. As part of the building permit review process the applicant provided information addressing the conditions listed above. Attached with this memo are the relevant cut sheets and plans that are being provided to the file to supplement the approved BAR plans. 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11V / / 111111111 1 11NG RAILROAD 062.8.51 &St ir0. EMPLOYEE 0111000 KURD' MA ell V,0 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION ENSTING 18. COTICAIROCO TO BE REMOVED • 0 0 PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL OTT. BOTANICAL KAYE / COMMON NAME SIZE NOTES / CECOUOUS TREES 5 *CETI X FREEMAN 'ara.aa' / ALTMAN ELATE MAPLE 5 CIL B&B \lir 2 camas BMUS TASTE/AM/ HOTKENA 5 CAL B&B / ELOGREEN BUS o 11 226)5 71111675 'VANDERNWS / 712100011:15'5 • .. IV IN. BSII MAGRI:01 SPUDS C) 27 EISTUS 621016141(1.15 / OFICHI) KOCK& Tel. IF HT. CCITT, 4' MC 0 55 MONA 62)770474 UNPACK / T , T, T. APE MIN. Ir HT. COIL 5 ac 0 95 VIBURNUM DA411 / DANES VSURN00 TAW4111 MN. le HT. COIL 5 ac CSIT 17 7 8 MEDIA • / HICK M. 4' HT. B&B, 4. 0.0 DECWOUS SNUBS 0 21 BERBER'S THINKRO ROSE 0.01 / BARBERNT Let le HI. CONT.. 5 010 C) 6 PINSOCAFPUS OPUURTLAIS VIISOLO' / NIPS= 07, TEr HY CONE 0 34 (BERK= THINBERGI 'AUREA' re V let 7( 47. COIL 5 010 PEFOINALS / GRASSES 0 3 EUPHORIA °MACIAS 'NUM / (URA I CAL CONT. • 104 hEUCTONTICKN SEMPEPARENS / BLUE 041 06635 cRowocovER I CAL. COIL 2' OC 650 ARCTOSTAFNILOS 710A -U99 / 0148041101 POT r aC AI 956 MAGA= 06770695 / BEACH 51081881140.1* I' P01 C2• 1 OC a.,,. , • , '.-R,,: .',.• ...•-• 21 MC 150 PRUNUS L 5191N1 VERNON / KUM VERNON LAUREL 1 GAL EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN KED AND NUM; ONLY DT UTLEY VAULT LANDSCAPE PLAN - 2V-0- LEGEND ..ii177(1 71)171 viCALPER 0 DEIN 146 1 015114 TREES TO KM T DEP TREE TREES 70 80 REMOVED C c011�1= 09,4 WEATHERED CRAKE (REFER 10 NOTE /10 (051840 7.04)50881 10 KNAPE LANDSCAPE NOTES 7 LANDSCAPE COTTRACTOR 10 CLEAR 080 0739 ALL =STING 660 82(65 ALCM NOVO PUP EAST. RENOWN IVY CARE 70 60 1841(1 6701 10 DAMAGE TREE ROOTS 2 6)3. 6(8 LANDSCAPE AREAS AONCENT 70 BUILONCS RID NNW PAWING LOT 70 80 SET AT 60475 271191 [LUMEN EXCEPT AS NOTED RESE AREAS TO RECME SPORTED 3 -WAY =SOL TO A unauum DEPTH CW SUBERADE "" . &EN 2157 12060765 12140 TCPSCI. 646 28706010 67 710105 ENTERPRISES. NC -6690 /ISIAH TOME IN TWO UFTS Cr r EACH. ROTOILL EACH UFT TO A !..4. a' 2110 1(008811 ALL 1051910 8005 111.41 AK SHERIPT TO want NOM 11) HAVE EASING NY ROAMED BY HAND 111111 CARE NOT 70 0881020 TREE ROWS INNER Ira 00 66 ADDED TO cunt 6u11A07846 SOW RENTED 1119 05. 110410 MIX 10 1041957 CF 40% BY VOLUTE NARK SOIL 40 BY VOLUME SATP. 810 208709 CONPOST AL 65 MIX TO SOILS TEST FRONDED BY SOL AAP PONT 1.600811817 (00 6011 77180 (90 080 218161 1081881071). 425-746-6665. TEST 7105-2) 1 881 KR P10861211 6605 19 6867 2147 BM( NILO 10 A WPM 0079 70 2'. EXISING KOS TO BE MULCHED AS NOTED 4 ALL PLANT MATERIAL HOS BEEN SELECTED TO BE 6600011 77010691. LANDSCAPE CCNTRACTCR 10 61 8091196071 FOR All 281(0816 85 REQUIRED BERK Fmk 60701716670 cc- wax 61) 0906. 5 CRUM COIIR 70 (81160 NOM All ocaDuous MOPES AT DIE SPECITED SPACING TD PROACE COMPLETE CEPERACE 86 841 17(086070 mos CESIONTID 10 6(007177 717100 0(00, KOPKO= BENEATH VERGREEN BUS TO DE WHAM A 5 CLEARANCE HEN aka or TRUNK 6 LANDSCAPE CRAW= N. BASED ON THE STE 7(6615 6006800 BY 141227 41118810070 INIEDIATELY 601(17 188105(8117 AROITICT OF 885 11180 CHANGES 10 DE STE P10865 0706 11611 6(788781 6005181161 70 DESIOT, 7 REFER 10 060 ENCINEERING CRANKS FOR GRAMS AND MANAGE !KORNAI= NIEDIATELT /PITY LANDSCAPE ARGIECT OF ANT NIKRSE DRAINAGE 1001045 11101 INT AFFECT THE HEALTH OF PLANT MATERIAL 5 NO FRE -EMERGENT HERBICTOES 17 21 USED 076 1147 P007701 910 00071G THE MST YEAR WARRANTY FEM. 9 Ei & B PLANTS TO BE DUG AND SECURED PRIOR TO END CE MARCH CReirr 1.0.4. 4.1,13 rr.w.c$4.14.4444ef”.(414 L- I21061 6.86180 607466t PA. VA NM pm YEW.. 426.88-1341 EPLE WM= REV 1 - CODE= 5/300 Shot160. ,a ARCHITECT TO INSPECT AND APFROVE AU. PLANT MATERIAL PRIDE TO PLANTING 10 (160080 ACCEPTABLE QUALITY. LATOSC TECT ICI 8150 60 171705(61 0778610 PLANT INSTALL/OEN TO ASSURE FR RANTING. It, BUNK TO BE (047(1117 60409(0 !RCN ALL LE & B PLANT MATERIAL AND LOOSEN ROOTS CE POTTED PLANTS 12. 6(9 189050' CATED 11114 A COMPLETELY ATITCNATIC IRRICATIOT 5151(4. 13, HEN CASCADES GRANT KULDERS TO BE P771070 21 PLANTING BEDS 40 BOULDERS TO BE 001 2610 THE SUMAC( IND P05110/10 11461 OF THE BOLDER SLOPES DONT IND 8881) 7004 11E WIER OF IT HIGH CASCADES CRANE AK AMIABLE 81 48.71764705 ROOT PRESTON, WASHRICTOI. ROE (425-392-3313). FRONDE A 1ED, SCES 14 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 10 1690(1 AND WROTE LANDSCAPE 10 011(018147 TOD PERCENT =PEEK. OF INE CON 11 0.11101 051 ITEMS, 080 THAT THE FR0/1115 ACCEP 1112 MAN ROCA PRIGAITON IL ILL PLE1E BY LANDSCAPE PLAN 6/71/1010 12 06 74503 co Onpfflal 1.6.4 2.1 1. 36 . Salt ono a* 6 reduced WM Ns L-1 60 3/01/03 70411 1' 1 1 1 1 1 1 -i .i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 V//,,'II 1II11I111111 Amp PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION Ell STREET 1011 LOCATE AND jTRUE EXS101 SLED( SEE N01E 99. ALT 145TAl1 92: OCT 4' EAND PATEN EpS .TNG ASPHALT AND NUN E951NC MITIGATION COIIROLR LOCATED N REC5814 ROOM STT NOTE �. A_L-T. y91n N 01(0 VNOEWR-NWIL i -d 09110iH OCWER 5404111E ANDOVER PARK EAST 444413443 Pll EXISTING IRRIGATION TO RERAN NE INTO E45181 1-1/2' MNNUNE AND INSTALL NEW DCVA. TUE ASTINC 1' CONCEIT TO ROUTE NEW MARES TO 1551141 CONTROLLER. SEE NOTE 10. UAL411V&L OECWUe •001.2 t IRRIGATION PLAN �;/ f- - IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION P.S.I. RAD. G.P.M. s w O NPs a Ise, O Wl5 RAN ORD 1806-STY-IPIOOO 90-2150 6' PCP -UP SPRAY RAN BAD 1806-SAM-IPI000 90-210. 6' POP -IP SPRAY RAN BM 1806 -1A14 -MP 571E STEEP. 6' POP-UP PRAY RAN BARD 1806 -SW -IP RBNT 51RP. 6' PCP -IP SPRAY RAN Pa 1826 -SNI -IP LETT STRIP. 6' PGP -IP SPRAY 55 55 50 50 50 IS' IS' 6'00' 6'011 6'DY 0.43 022 0.49 0.25 0.25 ................. 4(1441* 1100-06-12-10. LANDSCAPE OPER( W/ 0.6 PH ENNUIS 41 12' 0.0 PONT 0 CONNE0IXN : I 1-1/2' PASS GATE VALVE 1 FFOCO 805Y. 1-1/2' MORE aux VALVE MEASLY 1 1' RAIERD 44110. 1' OUP CGURING VALVE 201E NUMBER 1 RIPON) 150 PEW 1-1/2' MASTER VALVE v 9 RAN BIRD 100 -PTB -PRS, 1' REMOTE COMM VALVE lei (P.M. o RAIN BIR XCZ-I00-PRF-O.1 CAP OPITROL ZONE MT UM VALVE 142E W/ VAMP RELIEF VALVE AND MANUAL UNE RU9AK VALVE FOR 1401 ZONE a 1585ING RAN BIRD ES' -6, RIICAT11 CONTROLLER INSTALL A NEW RAIN BIRD RW -00X. RAN SENSOR (REFER TO NOTE 913 FON ALT 81 TO AID A 2-1NUE DECOOEI NODULE) 1 1/2' MA41NE. SCHEDULE 40 PVC CLASS 200 PVC LATERAL UNE (3/4' PUSS NOTED 0THERWISE) 4' 1414310. 59E0IIE 40 PVC PIPE SIZING TABLE PIPE SIZE MAX G.P.M. 3(4' CLASS 200 IP 10 10 GPM. 1 CLASS 200 I-1/4' CLASS 203 UP 10 16 GPM. IP 10 26 GPM. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. VENN LOCATIONS 0 ALL LN0 8GROUND 011U1E5 PHOT 10 COMMENLI9ENT OF WDA. PROTECT AUL NEM AND EXISTING UNTIES. PROMPTLY Nom OE LANDSCAPE ARO41ECT OF ANY 00455:1 BETWEEN PNOPOSE0 MRK ANO OBSTRUCTIONS. 2. MOP CONTRACTOR 91411 ROME 0OTEcnO1 0 ALL PROPERTY, PERSO4S WORK N FROOESS. STRUCTURES. 0136143. WALKS. CORNS PAVED SURFACES AND U050NG LANDSCAPE AND R*CA5O4 N PEMAN DURING Of INSTAILAION Cr LANDSCAPE AND RRIGATDN WOO. TERRY LOCATIONS 0 ALL UWER0i08D UTILITIES PRIOR 10 COWENCEMLNT Of WORK AP PROTECT SAO MUTES. 1 MARCH CONTRACTOR SHALL WTAN AND PAY F05 ALL NECESSARY PERMITS ANO FEES AS REPINED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND PENANCES FOR MS AMC ALL WORD TO BE MULLED PER LOCAL CWP REWRETENTS AND MANUFACTURE'S 9'ECEIGII01S. 4. P1EBBRDI0 MANME 10 100 P9 FOR A PERIOD 0 2 HOURS OE01 ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS FOR LENS AND WPM A5 REWIRED. PRONG( MIEN 8007819161104 m11 A PRESSURE 151 RAS PEN WNHE100 WIN N0 MORE IAN 5 P9 LOSS PPP INE TEST DURATION. S UPON 1K CO DEN 0 RR(8104 WORK OPERATE 11TE SYSTEM N 114 PRESENCE CE TIE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE ADA/ST A5 10.0100. 6. GUARANTEE ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMAN90P FOR A PERIOD 0 OE YEAR OIMYENCWNG Al TIE TIME OF MAL ACCEPTANCE. las GUARANTEE 0045 N01 APPLY 10 WLXO 0R DAMAGE OC7E 10 TIE IRRIGIWN 5Y5TEM BY OTHERS AFTER FNA ACCEPTANCE 7. MR TO MAL AC0PTANCE PROW( TALE OPER MiH A Y1 0 CLEARLY DRAW! REPROW09E 840010 0GAWRG3 9N)NNG ACTUAL LOCATNN AND TYPE 0 IaICA1108 ELEMENTS MEWED. R UNA ED5114G I' WRIT 10 PO1 NEW *WS To EXISTING CONTROLER. 11.1. 9/11 PROW( A NEW TENDINAE 2-119E 111075AL DECODER MW111 AND TRANFOIQR EXTERNALLY WONTED ADJACENT 10 CONTROLLER F GOOK 5 NOT U543LE FOR NEW WWES PROMOS (1) UNDEDRL OECEOE0 FON EACH AUTOMATIC VALVE AID PROM( (1) MCPHEE 100 -PROD -115 PORTABLE DECODER PROGRAMMER FOR OPER. 9. LOCATE AND UTILIZE E1OSTNG IRRIGATION 91EK. AL1. El: WE AND PA104 A9NILT AND INSTAL NEW 4' 9440E E (85194 SUM 5 NOT USABLE Cllr Mr ch. IeKIA 2511.1 /n144 3444,3443.3 Suiln 324 1ONBLTANN HL 31.411.104 I WO I44=41429.I10 Av 141940-4311 Boats 1E91 - DIY OMAN1 8/3/10 1M'ARN RAN 6/21/2010 0 CB 146.00 W Oryind >ave^P • seat mwe 34341.1l4e. W reduced Sod 14 L-2 SET CROW AT NURSERY / IE9T , — BARK MULM PER SPECS NOTE 94r0NG 10 OE 84445 PER DISTANCE 5.10144 M PLANT 5040DAE OGROUND COVER SPACING NIS 18 C) ,,,SHRUB PLANTING BA0(R1 TO CON5ST Cf 10P50. PER SECS AIN 00640) 14 PCR SPECS SCARIFY FOOTBALL CM CONTAINER MA1ENIA1. REMOVE ALL BURLAP ON BNB MATERIAL DOUBLE CHECK VALVE QUICK COUPLER VALVE MASTER VALVE FI RANT TREES 110 MOON TO AVOW P09111E DRAINAGE AWAY FR0 RWOIBAU. , — SECURE TRUNK %R DOBE STRAND a M GAUGE GALV. AARE %NAPPED IN CLEAR VUR. TMST TIGHT 2' 1114. 'BLS' LCOCEP0.0 PR4 REE STAKES MIR 6' CONICAL PONT TREE STAKING 415 36' DA REE RLS IN LAWN AREAL F4 0410 2' a 9E01ED MULCH RENUE AIL 00LAP AND WIRE BAS(E15 040601 RT MR 5014 10150E AND 504 41141E SOL ADD SPECIFIED FERDU2ER 10 MK FIN15H GRADE BEFORE MULCH/SOD 1' ABOVE FINISH GRADE DR1 SPLICE CONNECTORS PROVIDE 408 A 18' EXPANSION LOOP EXCESS WIRE. EUOTE CONTROL VALVE LASi1C ISOLATION BALL VALVE ANC SIZE AS CONTROL VALVE RSON STANDARD VALVE BOX VALVES PER VAULT T TO EXTEND MIN. 6' BELOW VE. USE EXTENSIONS A5 NEEDED. 18' PRO. KILTER C 404404E CN® ASPHALT PAVING R0004 /DECIMAL 4931411 AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL 4606400 HEADS ADM4034T TO CURB ESTABLISH CROWN AS INDICATED ROOKS TO BE SET ERM AND MOAN COMPACTED SUDR4DE. M APPROX 1/5 OF 1140 ROCK MAG5 TO BE 011 BELOW GRADE EOR SETTING ROCK INL04 PEN PUN MOTE OUTCROP 10 CON95 OF UM CASCADES WEATHERED GR4N1E (I) 5 MAN, AND (2) 2-.4N rr,..er.Nu.nHeela.ee. PER 410.40 11H04 NDCA1ED. 101 RCM MRI ALL (NOSED SIDES SLOPING OUT AND ANA, FROM 10' OF ROCK OPLANTER ISLAND N5 500-0- 1/11104-1' WMT 47P50L A5 SPEC6I0 REMah OUSTED 10' CORSE As N0LAMEL SCUM E051NG SRCR40 r0 OE(R OF 6' IND BANTU MIN 4.01 TO'501 PER SRCE1CA00N5 CRUSHED TW COURSE CR ibtrr 1' IN BED AREAS. BEFORE NULCH 544NDARD CARSON 12' VAI K BOK SN DR, SPeCF. CONNECTORS. pr/0900 FOR8A 24'24' LOOP OF EKCESS VAIN SII GRADE. 0R4' CONTROL ZONE KIT REFER TO IRRIGATION ---PALL VALVE AR Y UNIT SUPPORT ORNERS 0 PVC MAINLINE AVEC MIN. 3" DEPTH PVC ELBOW, TYP GATE VALVE / MAIN SHUT OFT NOTES: VALVE 804 SHALL NOT REST ON PIPES. 2 4L1 PIPE AND FITTINGS WITHIN VAULT TO BE SAME 9110 A5 D.C. V.A. 3 TEST COCKS SHALL HAVE A MIN. 12" CLEARANCE 5� POINT OF CONNECTION T 12' MIN PVC 1810821 UNE INSTALL POP-UP 5PRMKLER HEADS 3' ABM GRADE AND AD451 TO FRA91 MADE. SEE PLAN F0 NOEL AND BRAID +FN9H MME (I) *ARM RT1ING (2) 91RA1 BARB FITTINGS SWING PPE (18' MAK.) (' POP—UP HEAD PVC 5M. 40 ELL (0 TEE) 4. SE 5. ALL 6. INS 10 PVS SCH 40 FITTINGS (TYP.) COMPRESSION ADAPTER ODRIPIJNE LAYOUT x5 EDGE OF BED DRIPLINE TUBING SPACED 18' 0.C. AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE INSTALL AT EACH HIGH POINT DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT WITH VALVE, FILTER, k PRV PVC SCH 40 MAIN LINE PVC CLASS 200 LATERAL PVC SCH 40 SUPPLY HEADER TO BE SCH 40 PVC SAME SIZE EXPANSION COLS A44 EACH 0 S CONNECTION IS VALVE BOX. 4. COMPACT SOIL AROUND VALVE BOX TO SAME DENSITY AS UNDISTURBED ADJACENT 501E AUTOMA Ns TIC VALVE SET 1' ABOVE TOPSOIL BEFORE MUCLH RAIN PIRO SE8-6%, 6' VALVE BOX FINISH GRADE OF TOPSOIL 10 AR / VACUUM RELIEF VALVE AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE KIT. INSTALL AT EACH HIGH POINT OF DRIP ZONE. FITTING AS REWIRED PVC LATERAL OR DRIPLINE (3) BRICK SUPPORTS DRAIN ROCK TO A MIN. 12' DEPTH —PVC SCH 40 SX5 90 DRAM GRAVEL MIN 2' DEPTH PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH A5 REQUIRED). PVC SCH 80 UNION — IOP5011 DEPTH VARIES -P V G MAINLINE SCH 40 PVC TEE OR ELL NOTES: 1. PROVIDE VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS AS R(0)40(D. 2. SUPPORT VALVE BOA 1W IN (41 BR4C.5 3. TAPE CONTROL 98805 AND SPARE TO BOTTOM O MAINLINE (TYPICAL) PAVING, CONCRE FE OR PAVERS SUBBASE- REFER 40 CIVIL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS --MULCH TOPSOIL PER PLANTING PLAN BACKFILL SEE NOTE BELOW PVC LATERALS 2" PVC SCH. 40 WIRE SLEEVE PVC SCH 40 MIN. 2X DIA. OF INTERIOR PIPE L SLEEVING / PIPE TRENCHING PVC MAIN LINE VALVE HARING AND TRACE WIRE IF SPECIFIED z0 or) EE cnQ c 03 [fl = Lij cr 13 Q3 (n GOL91T44T 11 l3 L ASr :W Immo NW WA TI NI 4 Bala x00.115-8! RAIN. REV I - 810 608441 B/3/40 94M TM. 89s. 4wi4 b 2K" . J6 Ikt L-3 44 NOW 18 -AW • UI P wa o a -a i, ,% \}l o n 1va ‘..' ma V tas V ...5.s. • UI P wa a -a 40.v w -a �-- 1va ‘..' ma V tas V •T.d� Il pit. 1,) •1 :y� ✓ ,�v !P1,', .8 _ • 11. lj�,^A'�\ .Cp — e? filiti - _ s 9 -`1145- ONORTH ELEVATION 2 GENERAL NOTES 1. NL VERTICAL DIa40ID1E AR fIM110 FRINm 1OOR KEY NOTES ...)› PANTED 111 COPNG, SEE DEAL 9/18.1 , 21 RLVE'L 114, SFE DEI 28]/4451 <J soya 10 ODL1s ace SEPARATE PERYI 100. • came -val PAL? NOLL WONTED 430412 PER P101011EMC. 1W. •1 ` GOWN 110013. WHIRS PER HID1a(1RC. M. (1) TURK 4.0, PER STRUCTURAL . I • SEISM O5RHD DM DOOR. TIP <ej SECTIONAL OYERE D DRNE-N WOR, 11P \9 . 10110400R N/ 512.45 FRAME, IIP r10/ 1451 -IIP CONC. PARE1, 114. •1 . PAWL AOT. TIP.. SE IC I/A11 <lC 12' S 11 CaNNE1, TIP. PER DT. 12/49.1 •IE• 00840111 N/ SCUPPER BCM PEA DIL 6/081, 1141 .. • 1 ayars. SE 51RDC 345 • $/ PANED Sial war nZ> PARTIED 2101 TRUING Den WPM MING W W NEW/8M5008 015 ' PRE-ENEN NEO! SIDING 4' WEP 10500N111 NI.NE5 AW 5111 402.02.15 PER 55.41MIAE REtlIIfl44I0 0 (WOUND FROM AEW) COLOR TO WTCN N1L COMIC. WM EYEING R020 AS REOUNFD PAINT LEGEND PN1 - 1: 4NAAN WORE 11522 WO MUNE' I .I H1 - 1: aAR18N WOE 11133 Iter U.N• H1 - ] 0G4NRN WOE 12464-10 %low our CR�1fi1� OONaLTAM ISELE 824.10 PBiIT BET 7112..10 ®MT Revision: Sheet TON: DOW MANS Dale: Design: Dram. Project No: APpra.<e: a/01/l0 NC OPO 10-25].0] NC NWR5I *0080 i 2.( v 16. Sc. meets otmr0FON N reduce Sheet No: A4.1 COPYRIGHT CRAFT ARLNI1EC55 2010 70" VERTICAL STYLE ENVISOR FOOTPRINT / DESIGNER \ 49 gl leltt Z ii, ir t' Nif \ / 3916' UNIT3916' TOP OF ROOF_\ OUTSIDE DIMENSION 70" VERTICAL STYLE ENVISOR ELEVATION z 0 O W 0 O 70" VERTICAL STYLE ENVISOR SECTION NOTE: The Screen System shown corresponds to a typical construction of the Envisor 70" Vertical Style using Flat Panels. This drawing is intended to illustrate general dimensions of the Envisor System when installed on an average Roof Unit. Dimensions and specifications of the system can depending on the RTU's location to each other performance characteristics. SALES PERSON DESIGNER VARIES SYSTEM HEIGHT HEIGHT PROJECT Envisor® 70 Vertical Style tnterna 4200 Lyman Court, Hilliard, Ohio 43026 Ph. (877) SCREENS Fax (800) 726-4817 www.cityscapesinc.com DATE 4/18/03 LAST REVISION 9/13/04 General Specifications1itvSapes DRAWING No. 100393S3.FH9 (70VERT091304.PDF) SCALE none CLIENT THIS DRAWING IS SUBMITTED BY CITYSCAPES INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE AS AN AID IN PROJECT PLANNING. IT IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, EXHIBITED, OR FABRICATED IN ANY FASHION WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM AN AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF THE COMPANY. ENVISOR ISA REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF CITYSCAPES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 0 i --- — CURB -\� -' CURB c3 i 3916' UNIT 3916 NOTE: The Screen System shown corresponds to a typical construction of the Envisor 70" Vertical Style using Flat Panels. This drawing is intended to illustrate general dimensions of the Envisor System when installed on an average Roof Unit. Dimensions and specifications of the system can depending on the RTU's location to each other performance characteristics. SALES PERSON DESIGNER APPRV.BY/DATE PROJECT Envisor® 70 Vertical Style tnterna 4200 Lyman Court, Hilliard, Ohio 43026 Ph. (877) SCREENS Fax (800) 726-4817 www.cityscapesinc.com DATE 4/18/03 LAST REVISION 9/13/04 General Specifications1itvSapes DRAWING No. 100393S3.FH9 (70VERT091304.PDF) SCALE none CLIENT THIS DRAWING IS SUBMITTED BY CITYSCAPES INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE AS AN AID IN PROJECT PLANNING. IT IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, EXHIBITED, OR FABRICATED IN ANY FASHION WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM AN AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF THE COMPANY. ENVISOR ISA REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF CITYSCAPES INTERNATIONAL, INC. • 0 �,� f r 'J� X'Ix[L\ t �e Y 5, Beverages A National Beverage Company 1227 And er ark East PNT - 1: BENJAMIN MOORE #1522 °INNER CPA -1-r Air c 11 I 1 e c s s Pm(oct Name: SHASTA BEVERAGES INC. WAREHOUSE ADDITION 2505 3rd Ave, Suite 324, Seattle WA 98121 Name: SIGN COLOR RENDERING Date: 08!04!10 Craft Architects ROM Mather. 10.19103 Slaw: N.T.S. ph. (206) 720-7001 Sheet Revised: 1011209 S tetCh NunCcr. fx. (206) 720-2949 'Fjl1 tll°� tt�1' II ai (� ,:lii•il Ili/i� {Illi, �rtiilrr.riEtEJ9� �IE11c` •011•1••••••11011llk1L,111 t. 1.1111 4'4111II Ill�ljrrltti��ir,r.IIliEll j/SII: {'illtiii ;:::• iklklkt i111t., illi('11111.,1111.I 1 (101.l(r(1 i iillll'i1.11N'I Series Names & Model #'s Roll Formed Bench Signature Series Customized Benches Diamond Pattern Bench Without Back Perforated Bench Without Back Roll Formed Perforated Bench Wire Bench Armless Roll Formed Diamond Bench Product maintenance Inspect all hardware and fasteners, regularly check tha of vandalism on any of your products thermoplastic simple take a rag and a aerosol,can of o40'� a simple take an industrial heat gun to the affecte W Thermoplastic Coating Our outdoor furniture is covered in a copolymer - the coating will never fade, crack, peel, warp, or any other process. This keeps the metal base free of a 25-30 mills. This allows maximum protection with the best repaired by heating the affected area with an industrial heat g • Roll Formed: Benches specs C� g s. rAb 43 *7 Q\ sed thermoplast dis or for the SHASTA COLOR CHOICE: BROWN RF72D, RF96D RFP6, RFP8 RFNB4, .`', NB5, RFNB6 RFN = PERRFNB5-PERF, RFNB6-PERF RF PEIF i R -PERF lee NA PA2I iFNA96D el& _0. O • re cure. cs ac the soa eriodi• =IIy examine for any signs andatized by spray paint, plastic surface has any cuts d water. • cor 44 owd ofth ating. Thermoplastic is environmentally safe, oduct. Thermoplastic has the best adhesion rate of ilities. Thermoplastic is applied at a thickness of ace. Thermoplastic can be easily repaired. Cuts are e thermoplastic will rebound itself. The properties of thermoplastic also make spray painting difficult for vandals. Simply wash product with a standard industrial cleaner. Specifications General All of the listed products above are protected with Thermoplastic coating. Predrilled holes for surface mounting. Cast iron legs. Signature series customized benches have four optional areas for text and graphics. 6' diamond/perforated bench - Weight: 265 lbs. 8' diamond/perforated bench - Weight: 300 lbs. 4' diamond bench no back - Weight: 140 lbs. 5' diamond bench no back - Weight: 150 lbs. 6' diamond bench no back - Weight: 160 lbs. 6' armless bench - Weight: 250 lbs. 8' armless bench . Weight 285 lbs ,r,C;,, • .. WB72 - Weight: 147 lbs. ... .._.. _ .,... 'Check for any -damage' r missrng'paits or ifyou have problems' assembling your fumiture / equipment please•cali our customer service center. 4' perforated bench no back - Weight: 155 lbs. 5' perforated bench no back - Weight: 165 lbs. 6' perforated bench no back - Weight: 175 lbs. Page 1 Diamond Pattern Bench W/Back Top view 5 1x8" Z- 5/8" k -2518- --1L-11/2" i 314' f tra-n EI n Ve'a rtr r"n trErtrirra-- 1100[1 ] ' { 0 goag JU o_ LGUTA-n.Ca.n.,0_o-o_.1..n.a10�. Shasta bench -- F-1 5/8' oiio 0000g'ouanauouoiio -2518" Roll Formed Bench(oiamond, Perforated, Signature Series 411 Seat Side view - 1'-83!4" 11-1- it L9 3/8`� 3' 1 n f? p91 -)J 2'-118" Side view I 1'.83/4" 1'-8 5/8" V-117/8" 2'•1!2" 41/2" --t- -1- 1%43/4" Top view L.-15/8" O. L.+1 r�_L_e.u_a.a C_a c c U ❑,c_C LI r nlrU 1}ILClcrpli1J-i ;CDt1VOilr. 2' 2' qmPill IVIr At 01 9 kilhoo I 51/8" 1--25/8- Front -2518"Front View - -r-15/8- 1 2%9118" 2%0" U— 1%5" — 1.-51/8" 1%63/8" V-1.3/4 4518" V-81/8" P Side view I 071�; #+�5jj" !1lI�I�C1�:: Available Styles Quantities (per bench) Hardware Z.95/8' II Diamond Perforated Wire Page 2 IA - Machine Bolt - qty 6 1B - 5/16"Washer - qty 6 1C - 5/16"Nut - qty 6 2 - Cast Steel Bench Leg w/o Back - qty 2 3 - 11 Gage SteelBench.Seat w/o Back - qty 1 4 - Cast Steel Bench Leg with Back - qty 2 5 - 11 Gage Steel Bench Seat with•Back - qty 1 • 5/16"Machine head a 5/16"Washer U •5/16"Nut 318 East 8th Street 1 PO Box #1891 La Crosse, KS 87548 T: 888.848.26931F: 868.436.7601 scale 1/2" z Assembly Instructionsk Roll Formed Bench Signature Series Customized Benches Diamond Pattern Bench W/out Back Roll Formed Perforated Bench Rolled Wire Bench Note: Work 1 one side at a time. Do not tightly secure bolts until product is fully assem Step 1: Check that all hardware, legs, and seats are accounted for. Total parts for the assembly of one bench with or with out back equals two legs, one seat, six 5/ machine bolts, six 5/16" washers, a 5/16" nuts. (for all benches the washer placed on the inside of th between the nut and the Step 2A: RF72D, RF96D RFP -6, RFP -8 RFNB-4, RFNB-5 RF72PERF WB72 X2 i,, I, ;IiflL�, ,;r;rnole,ciL...'F Place Bench with back on its back side and s :�•y attaching the first leg at the top of the seat. With out tightening any of the bolts move to the seat bottom back bolt them the bottom front bolt. Repeat with other leg. Step 2B: Prop Bench with out back seat down and start by attaching the first leg at the middle of the seat. With out tightening any of the bolts move to the other two bolt. Repeat with other leg. (To prevent damage to your bench place a blanket underneath the bench.) upiDD Afl0lDllD D0lO0D 00000uIlhoo000uDDoo000u00ri 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000 oppo°flo°o�poprooppo D0000��D00000��DD000 00000000000000000 00 X1 oD0Ord oo0001 11PaaODoD00l 0100000000000000000o0o 000000[10 • l€€ 000000000000000000 0s1 Step 3: After all bolts are in place flip bench on its feet. Then Tighten all of the bolts in the same progression that you started with. After all bolts are tightened enjoy your new bench. l 000000000000011000000 oo00oa00oo00aS00000000000000000 flM0000000hoouonoo[dh[lo �.0 0 0 0 ori °�°oaicaie° u a ° 318 East 8th Street 1 PO Box #189 1 La Crosse, KS 67548 • T: 888.846.2693 1 F: 866.436.7601 Page 4 • elk of g ufwita ID Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing x Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Project Number: E10-012 Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _17 day of _lune in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: Craft Architects, Shasta Beverages Project Number: E10-012 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles A Mailer's signature: t r /1' /2 / !/ A A W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of'ukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite # 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E10-012 Applied: 05/24/2010 Issue Date: 06/17/2010 Status: APPROVED Applicant: CRAFT ARCHITECTS Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage has filed applications for development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. The project is located at 1227 Andover Park East Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: 1227 ANDOVER PK E TUKW 3523049072 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2 lc.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under the option DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period. Jack Pa Respor>3"ibfe Official City of i. kwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) A....• nMeno_am7 o.i.,tio.l• na_1 n_.)ni n AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( )US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division ) Dept of Ecology, SEPA (>.Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 • ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( ) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website 62 Tr PO leC+ ‘11 --7/ L5( ./ Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA- Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application;bn the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR Shasta Beverage Addition Case # E10-012 To: Jack Pace, SEPA Responsible Official From: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Date: June 17, 2010 Re: E010-012 (SEPA Determination) Shasta Beverage. Building Addition 1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage has filed applications for development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Shasta Beverage Addition Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Location: 1227 Andover Park East, King County Parcel # 352304-9072 Zoning: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Comprehensive Plan Designation: The current Comprehensive Plan for the subject site is Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) . Notice: Notice of Application was distributed to adjacent property owners and tenants; local agencies; and posted on the site on June 2, 2010 The following information was considered as part of review of this application: 1. SEPA Checklist received May 24, 2010 2. Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist received May 24, 2010 • • 3. Civil Plans (sheets C1 to C7) prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, date stamped by the City on May 24, 2010. 4. Topographic survey prepared by Barghuasen Consulting Engineers, date stamped by the City on May 24, 2010. 5. Landscaping Plan prepared by WBLA, date stamped by the City on May 24, 2010. 6. Site Lighting Plan prepared by Tina Brannon, date stamped by the City on May 24, 2010. 7. Architectural Plans (Sheets A1.1 and 4.1) prepared by Craft Architects, date stamped by the City on May 24, 2010. 8. Technical Information Report prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, dated stampted by the City on May 24, 2010. 9. Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Solutions NW, dated date stamped by the City on May 24, 2010. 11I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Shasta Beverage currently occupies an existing 61,520 square foot warehouse/office/manufacturing facility at 1227 Andover Park East (King County Parcel 352304-9072). The building was originally constructed in 1967 and has been in continuous operation since. At the time of the original construction of the building, a Targe area to the north of the building was prepared with pre -load in anticipation of a future addition. Shasta Beverage is now proposing a 42,812 square foot addition to the existing building. As part of the project, Shasta Beverage will add additional parking on the site and upgrade and provide additional landscaping. According to King County Assessor information the project site occupies 4.17 acres. The site is largely developed with the existing building, preload, parking and outdoor storage. There are no sensitive areas on or near the site nor is the site within the shoreline jurisdiction of the Green River. Agencies with Jurisdiction: Washington State Department of Ecology Other Required Permits: Public Hearing Design Review Building Permits City of Tukwila, DCD City of Tukwila, DCD B. Miles Page 2 06/10/2010 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\SEPA\SEPA, Staff Report, 2010.06.09.doc Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth Currently sand and silty sand occupies the area where the addition is proposed. The general soils on the remaining site are gravelly sandy loam. The project site is located in the valley floor of the Green River and thus is largely, flat. The maximum grade on the site is 13%; however this is an artificial slope provided at the truck court. There is no history of unstable soil conditions on the property. Approximately 950 cubic yards of cut/fill are proposed on the site as part of the proposed construction. During construction BMPs will be employed to reduce the chances of erosion. Upon competition of the project, the chances of erosion are low. £�—•Air Emissions to the air during construction and grading activities will be the result of vehicle and equipment exhaust and dust during dry weather. During construction, the applicant will comply with Best Management Practices to reduce emissions to the air. The proposed project is for a manufacturing/distribution facility. The use is auto dominated, requiring the use of trucks to transport soda product. These trucks do generate exhaust fumes. Water Concur with checklist. • Plants There are several large trees located in the front of the property near the street and the office for Shasta Beverage. All trees in the front of the property are proposed to be retained. One cottonwood located in the addition area will be removed. The applicant is. proposing to upgrade the landscaping on the site which will include the removal of ivy and junipers and the installation of new groundcover, shrubs and trees. Animals Concur with checklist. Energy/Natural Resources As noted in the background section of this document, the existing facility was developed in the 1960s. Environmental Health There are no environmental health hazards associated with this project. No special emergency services are needed as a result of this project. B. Miles Page 3 06/10/2010 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\SEPA\SEPA, Staff Report, 2010.06.09.doc Land/Shoreline Use The subject property is zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). The proposed use is a permitted use in the TUC zone. Under the City's proposed Urban Center Plan, this area of the TUC will be considered "workplace" and the proposed use is consistent with the draft TUC plan. The property is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction of the Green River. Housing Concur with Checklist. Aesthetics The project is subject to the City's design review regulations. A public hearing before • the Board of Architectural Review has tentatively been scheduled for June 24, 2010. As part of this project the applicant will upgrade the existing landscaping on the site. All existing trees in the front of the property will be retained. Light and Glare The applicant has provided a Site Light Plan which shows that lighting levels near property lines will be minimal. The applicant is proposing shielding the lighting in order to decrease the chance of lighting impacting adjacent uses. It should be noted that adjacent uses include warehouses, a public street and railroads all of which would not be impacted by the proposed lighting from the project site. Recreation Concur with Checklist. Historic and Cultural Preservation During construction if any landmarks or evidence of historical, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance are found on the sites, work will stop immediately and the contractor will notify the City of Tukwila, Washington State Office of Archeology, and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Transportation Concur with checklist. The project is required to comply with the City's traffic concurrency requirements and pay traffic impact fees. The project does utilize an existing railway spur located on the west side of the property. The proposed railroad spur will be retained. Public Services The project will require a minimal amount of police and'fire service. The site will also have the ability to utilize Metro Bus Service along Andover Park West. B. Miles Page 4 06/10/2010 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\SEPA\SEPA, Staff Report, 2010.06.09.doc • • • ' Utilities Adequate utilities are available to serve the proposed project. PUBLIC COMMENTS An email from Costco was received on June 8, 2010. The email was not a comment to the project but only asked if Andover Park East was going to be closed. CONCLUSION AND PROPOSED MITIGATION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact and a Determinationof Non -Significance should be issued. B. Miles Page 5 06/10/2010 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\SEPA\SEPA, Staff Report, 2010.06.09.doc kyi y F Garter rpt tvriper 4);" IrI.1' Late +rw. rr fro rru Ssa ,S�riathcrtrr <,. is w, n Irl VICINITY MAP NTS C arch' t e c t s SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA. 98188 NORTH • • MEMORANDUM www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Brandon Miles, Senior Planner o FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: June 17, 2010 SUBJECT: Shasta Beverage Addition 1227 Andover Park East SEPA, Design Review, and Miscellaneous Comments SEPA — E10-012 Project to comply with Geotechnical Engineering Study, by Earth Solutions NW, LLC, dated May 19, 2010; and subsequent geotechnical reports. Verify and provide separate cut and fill quantities. Provide a completed Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application. (See enclosed) Traffic Concurrency Test Fee due under SEPA/Design Review is $5,000.00 based on 43,000 Gross Floor Area (GFA) of new Warehouse in Zone 1. (See page 2 of 2 of Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application. Fee to be paid to Public Works under PW permit C10-xxx. The Environmental Checklist should be revised as follows: B. Environmental Elements 5. Animals a. Birds — The site will remain partially native and is near native areas. Many common species of birds may be on the site on occasion. Mammals — Many common species of rodents and small mammals may be on the site on occasion. c. Yes — This area is part of the Pacific Flyway. A primary corridor for migratory bird species. Page 1 of 2 • • Design Review — L10-030 Provide a completed Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application. (See enclosed) Traffic Concurrency Test Fee due under SEPA/Design Review is $5,000.00 based on 43,000 Gross Floor Area (GFA) of new Warehouse in Zone 1. (See page 2 of 2 of Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application. Fee to be paid to Public Works under PW permit C10-xxx. Miscellaneous Comments Transportation Impact Fee shall apply to any future Building Permit. (See bulletin A3 enclosed). The Applicant provided the following comments: "Traffic and congestion process - This site is currently and will continue to be accessed via Andover Park East. Easy access to.both I-405 and I-5 is conveniently to the north at a signaled intersection. Upon completion, approximately four (4) additional employees will work in the new facility for one shift between 6:30 am and 3:00 pm. Most truck traffic will occur during the same hours. No customer or visitor traffic will occur. We believe that ' because the intersection is signaled, employees, neighbors and/or Tukwila residents will not notice the changes in traffic and congestion patterns." "It is anticipated that approximately 10 trips per day would be generated by the completed project. It is anticipated that the peak volume would occur between 6:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m." The Traffic Impact Fee will be calculated by the Public Works Department based on the best available information. It is important for Shasta Beverages to provide as much accurate and detailed information as possible. Please provide the number of employees currently working at this location and the number of delivery trucks (including delivery times). Page 2 of 2 UP IF eitg of J u11wila Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: X Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: Shasta Beverage Addition Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Project Number: L10-030 Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Mailing requested by: Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action ` Planning Commission Agenda Packet 11 J---- Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit — _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _10 day of June in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: Shasta Beverage Addition Project Number: L10-030 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles 4 Mailer's signature: ` l r 7Th )// / / l /�C 11 J---- 1 W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this pro - Shasta Beverage Addition Location: 352304-9072 File #'s: L010-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) Other Permits: None Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Property Owners: National Beverage Project Planner: Brandon Miles, 206-431-3684 Project Description: Development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage pro- jects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. a 0 ,. Project' 1227 A S18 Pk E Comments and Appeals: The applications are availab e for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Com- munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcen er Blvd #100. You are invited to comment on these projects at a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, scheduled for 7:00 pm. June 24, 2010 at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431-3670. City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this pro - Shasta Beverage Addition Location: 352304-9072 File #'s: L010-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) Other Permits: None Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Property Owners: National Beverage Project Planner: Brandon Miles, 206-431-3684 Project Description: Development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage pro- jects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. S 180th Street Comments and Appeals: The applications are availab a for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Com- munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcen er Blvd #100. You are invited to comment on these projects at a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, scheduled for 7:00 pm, June 24, 2010 at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431-3670. City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this Shasta Beverage Addition Location: 352304-9072 File #'s: L010-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) Other Permits: None Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Property Owners: National Beverage Project Planner: Brandon Miles, 206-431-3684 Project Description: Development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage pro- jects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. a 0. 0 -s S 180th Street Project `+ t 1227 A diver Pk 1 Comments and Appeals: The applications are availab e for review at the City of Tukwila. Department of Com- munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcen er Blvd #100. You are invited to comment on these projects at a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, scheduled for 7:00 pm, June 24, 2010 at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431-3670. City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this pro - Shasta Beverage Addition Location: 352304-9072 File #'s: L010-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) Other Permits: None Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Property Owners: National Beverage Project Planner: Brandon Miles, 206-431-3684 Project Description: Development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage pro- jects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. L 0 S 180th Street - k] Comments and Appeals: The applications are availab e for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Com- munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcen er Blvd #100. You are invited to comment on these projects at a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, scheduled for 7:00 pm, June 24, 2010 at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431-3670. • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City ofTukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 . 4 • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director June 4, 2010 Via US Mail and Email Ms. Kathy Craft -Reich Craft Architects 2505 Third Avenue, Suite 324 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Shasta Beverage Addition SEPA and Design Review Application Dear Ms. Craft -Reich: ' The City received the above permit applications on May 24, 20.10. A Notice of Application has been distributed to adjacent property owners and other interested parities (Local and State Agencies). The comment period will close on June 16, 2010. A public hearing, before the Board of Architectural Review (BAR), has tentatively been scheduled for June 25, 2010. In order to meet this hearing date, Planning wanted to provide you initial comments on the SEPA and Design Review Application. Please note that these comments only include Planning and other Departments are still reviewing the SEPA and Design Review applications. Typically, comments from other Departments can be addressed through the building permit; however it is possible that other Departments could have issues that will impact the site layout or building design. Site Design 1. The site plan needs to reflect the actual usage of the site. As I noted in my email dated June 2, 2010, parking is occurring in an unmarked area on the southside of the building. This current condition is in violation of city regulations, both Planning, Public Works and Fire. The site plan must reflect approved parking areas. If the current unmarked parking area can comply with City code, the City would suggest that we designate this as parking. Please note that the area will need to comply with the City's parking, stormwater, and fire access requirements. B. Miles Page 1 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\Department Review\Comment Letter, 2010.06.04.doc 06/04/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 2. It has been noted that the City's required parking for the project is too high. The parking calculations appear to be using the gross floor area and not the usable floor area. TMC 18.06.863 defines usable floor area as, "...that part of the floor area of any structure which is actually used from time to time for any commercial purposes, such as sales area, display area, walkways or storage area. Parking calculation shall not include common corridors, designed for the circulation of people at a non -retail establishments, restrooms, elevator shafts, and stairwells at each floor, mechanical equipment rooms or attic spaces and exterior covered loading docks". Applying this definition to the building would likely require a lower parking count. The main reason that the City is bringing this issue up is to determine the feasibility of eliminating the four proposed parking stalls in the northwest corner of the site. These stalls are isolated and likely will not be used. 3. If the parking is eliminated on the northwest side of the building the only need for ‘,14‘ X the paved surface is for Fire access. The City would like to see grasscrete used in lieu of asphalt. The grasscrete would help soften the image of this area which b ti)C would be located adjacent to two large warehouse style buildings. The grasscrete, 94% could also have benefits for your stormwater design \4. 4. A marked, accessible route of travel from the existing handicap stalls on the property needs to be provided. Please show the route on the site plan. 5. There is currently a significant amount of outdoor storage in the proposed addition area, yet the proposed site plan shows no outdoor storage. Is outdoor storage no longer needed? If outdoor storage will occur on the site please show it on the site plan and provide details on proposed screening. Landscaping 1. Under TMC 18.70.090 when a project triggers design review all landscaping on the site must be brought up to City standards. a. A landscaping plan for the entire site needs to be provided. b. The existing parking on the south property line does not comply with the City's parking standards. All parking areas shall terminate with a landscaping island and no parking stall shall be spaced more than 100 feet from a landscaping island. Additionally, TMC 18.52.030 requires additional landscaping for each individual parking stall. Given site constraints, the City would propose that the area identified as being planted with erosion control hydroseed be planted with trees, shrubs and ground cover. The City will allow this to count for the required landscaping B. Miles Page 2 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\Department Review\Comment Letter, 2010.06.04.doc 06/04/2010 per stall and will not require installing landscaping in the parking area located along the south property liner. 2. The Civil Plan and the Landscaping plan appear to conflict in some areas. Update the landscaping plan to show any utility boxes or other intrusions with the landscaped areas. 3. The City would like the St. Johnswort on the north property line replaced with the Beach Strawberry. Please note that the City is still completing its review of the landscaping plan and will likely require some modifications to the proposed planting spacing of several of the shrubs and groundcover. However, these changes do not need to be addressed at this time. When you submit the building permit you will be required to submit an irrigation plan which will be reviewed and approved by the City. Building Design The City has some concerns with the proposed building design and the ability of it to comply with our design standards. The criteria in the TMC is independent of the existing building design and the condition of the surrounding environment. However, the City realizes that some accommodation is needed given some of the constraints of the project. With this in mind the City's only design comments are on the east facing wall, the wall that will face the public street. 1. The existing building is broken down into several distinct elements, there is the exposed aggregate concrete which is proposed as "bay leaf' and then the "inner balance" colored concrete. The existing building also has a prominent roof edge as well as column like structures. The City would like to see additional building elements from the front of the existing building carried through the addition, such as the bay leaf color, a more prominent roofline or the occiaional use of the column appearance. Note that the City is not asking for the entire addition to look like the existing structure, only a design feature which will help break up the wall and help tie the addition to the existing building. An area of the wall to consider would be behind the three trees shown on sheet A4.1. 2. As noted the City would like the landscaping area noted as having "erosion control grass" improved with trees and other landscaping. Adding trees in this area would help to break up the large scale of the surrounding building walls. Signage I If you add additional parking on the south property line as outlined in the Site Design section of this letter the City will also allow the required landscaping to be transferred. B. Miles Page 3 06/04/2010 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\Department Review\Comment Letter, 2010.06.04.doc • • 1. Is a new freestanding sign proposed? The colors of the existing sign are not consistent with the proposed colors of the building. Next Steps Your next step is to address the comments listed and make the needed changes to the appropriate plans. In order to make the June 25th meeting date a response, with updated plans must be submitted to the City by the end of business on June 9th. This is a tight turnout, but staff must prepare the staff report and packet that will go to the BAR. Staff is currently working on the staff report assuming that many of the issues addressed in this letter are going to be addressed. If for some reasons these issues cannot be addressed we will have to look at moving this item to the July meeting in order for staff to have additional time to review your response and to prepare a revised staff report. Staff is available to meet next Monday or Tuesday to discuss the comments outlined in this letter. Please let me know if you would like to meet. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431-3684 •or send an email to bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Braddon J. Miles Senior Planner cc. File (L10-030) B. Miles Page 4 06/04/2010 H:\Developments\Shasta Addition\Department Review\Comment Letter, 2010.06.04.doc TO: Development Review Supplemental Memorandum Public Works Development Review Staff Fire Development Review Staff Building Development Review Staff FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner DATE: June 1, 2010 RE: Shasta Beverage Addition 1227 Andover Park East Project Description Shasta Beverage is proposing an addition to their existing building at 1227 Andover Park West. The project is subject to design review and SEPA review. Attached is the relevant project documentation that has been submitted for the design review and SEPA application. The following items are being routed. 1. Design Review Application 2. Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless 3. Aerial Map 4. SEPA Application, with ESA Screening and SEPA Checklist 5. Design Review Narrative 6. Concurrency Test Information (Public Works Packet Only) 7. Civil Plans, date stamped May 24, 2010, sheets C1-C7 and Survey 8. Sheet A.1, L-1, and Lighting Plan Notes to Development Review Team Please provide any comments by June 15, 2010 regarding the proposed project. This maybe your only opportunity to review or provide comments on this project. Please list any additional permits or requirements that you Department may impose on the project. Any condition should be supported by applicable code citations. Thanks. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RECEIVED JUN 01; 2010 TUKWIi!A PUBLIC WORKS File Number )-93.2 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building 0 Planning L�.L tc 'Uork`' ksem kFire Dept. Police Dept. 0 Parks/Rec Project: ��I�q ,_j _ jj�� �G►t"11� 1 vcits* Comments Address: ILl1 /Pr - prepared by: Date transmitted: i (! 1 Response requested by: /_ (� q, Staff coordinator: 1:5. A k) Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) i65 (GN Rtvl EW oleo -5 Put Ltclvo k� 12eCaviRErn1,Jr. . (5 66 telirg4c44 CoNtor e"pr 5) Dildo G//!o//o pubs c uJOAS A6 e4 L4 , r5 (SIS ,4 r GN J Coinni4irs) D x/16//0 Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: 10 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number LID- 930 tip-1/4DR LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: 'Building • lan`ning7 Public Works Fire Dept. U Police Dept. n Parks/Rec Project: ")Lik��s1/2C Comments Address: 1121 APS, prepared by: Date transmitted: / (� i 1 [ 0 Response requested by: f. 41 1 l7 Staff coordinator: 15. Ale', Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L()- 9.3) I 0-31 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM ❑o Planning Public Works Fire Dept. lea Police Dept. 0 Parks/Rec Project: 4)1 /411-1, 4T .( v f jL Comments Update date: Address: L2] At.) Date transmitted: r1 Response requested by: /- V (I I 10 Staff coordinator: 15. A le) Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date:6 -- Comments Update date: -VO prepared by: ; %i City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number 9 3J LAND USE HERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building LSI Planning IkPublic Works Fedaept: Police Dept. 0 Parks/Rec Project: G J (? t ) VC/ jL Comments prepared by \ Update date: Address: 1111 AP6- Dater transmitted: 1 11110 Response requested by: /_ L(1 [ 0 StaffDate coordinator: f 5. Pkik, response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: (p` Z'k D Comments prepared by \ Update date: v .. Cita of J itaa Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Name: Shasta Beverage Building Addition Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: L10-030 Determination of Non -Significance Mailing requested by: Brandon Mile Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's signature: / / 7) 7i7A Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda X Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 1 day of June in the year 2010 Mailed to addresses attached and sent to IT for City website posting Project Name: Shasta Beverage Building Addition Project Number: L10-030 Mailing requested by: Brandon Mile Mailer's signature: / / 7) 7i7A 0 W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of Tukwila Notice of Application You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of the proposed project Shasta Beverage Building Addition June 2, 2010 Location: 1227 Andover Park East, King County Parcel 352304-9072 File #'s: L10-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) and E10-012 (Environmental Review) Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Property Owners: National Beverage Corporation Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Project Description: Shasta Beverage is proposing to add a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of bever- age projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. The project is subject to design review and environmental review. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only oppor- tunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable sig- nificant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. Comments and Appeals: Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on June 16, 2010. You may request a copy of any decision, and your appeal rights by calling Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684 or by sending an email to bmiles@ci.tukwilawaus. The project is subject to a public hearing and you will receive a separate notice regarding the hearing date. City of Tukwila Notice of Tukwila Notice of Application You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of the proposed project Shasta Beverage Building Addition June 2,2010 Location: 1227 Andover Park East, King County Parcel 352304-9072 File #'s: L10-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) and EI0-012 (Environmental Review) Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Property Owners: National Beverage Corporation Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Project Description: Shasta Beverage is proposing to add a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of bever- age projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. The project is subject to design review and environmental review. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only oppor- tunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable sig- nificant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second•comment period. Comments and Appeals: Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on June 16, 2010. You may request a copy of any decision, and your appeal rights by calling Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684 or by sending an email to bmiles@ci.tukwilawa.us. The project is subject to a public hearing and you will receive a separate notice regarding the hearing date. City of Tukwila Notice of Tukwila Notice of Application You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of the proposed project Shasta Beverage Building Addition June 2, 2010 Location: 1227 Andover Park East, King County Parcel 352304-9072 File #'s: L10-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) and E10-012 (Environmental Review) Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage Property Owners: National Beverage Corporation Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Project Description: Shasta Beverage is proposing to add a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of bever- age projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. The project is subject to design review and environmental review. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only o or- tunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probab nificant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued at a second comment period. Comments and Appeals: •Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on June 16, 2010. You may request a copy of any decision, and your appeal rights by calling Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684 or by sending an email to bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. The project is subject to a public hearing and you will receive a separate notice regarding the hearing date. City of Tukwila Notice of Tukwila Notice of Application You are receiving this notice because you are a_prs2perty owner or tenant within 500ft of the proposed project Shasta Beverage Building Addition June 2, 2010 Location: 1227 Andover Park East, King County Parcel 352304-9072 File #'s: L10-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) and E10-012 (Environmental Review) Applicant: Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage • Property Owners: National Beverage Corporation Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Project Description: Shasta Beverage is proposing to add a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of bever- age projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is • already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. The project is subject to design review and environmental review. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only oppor- tunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable sig- nificant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. Comments and Appeals: Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on June 16, 2010. You may request a copy of any decision, and your appeal rights by calling Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684 or by sending an email to bmiles@ci.tukwilawa.us. The project is subject to a public hearing and you will receive a separate notice regarding the hearing date. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS 1120 ANDOVER PARK W TUKWILA WA 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development .6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS 1180 ANDOVER PARK W SEATTLE WA 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 Project Site 1 n ovit Pk E Pro JAMES CAMPBELL COMPANY L L 1001 KAMOKILA BLVD KAPOLEI HI 96707 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 PETSCHL,WILLIAM J 1150 ANDOVER PARK E TUKWILA WA 98188 OWNER_NAME JAMES CAMPBELL COMPANY L L TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS PETSCHL,WILLIAM J TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS KMBR LLC B APPOLLO SPAS/MANAGER TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS TRI -LAND CORPORATION UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TUKWILA OCCUPANT/BUSINESS SEGALE PROPERTIES LINCOLN CENTER HOLDINGS COSTCO/MANAGER DANELLIE LLC WALTON CWWA SOUTHCENTER 4 KLEIN,HARRIS GRAY CAT COLLECTIVE LLC SADE,PAUL & ELEANOR ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTING INC LES SCHWAB TIRES/MANAGE HOME DEPOT/MANAGER TUPPER,LYNN COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND UNION PACIFIC CORP AMC FAMILY LLC SFP B LTD PTNRSHP PHILLIPS,JAMES W MR & MRS OWNER_ADDRESS 1001 KAMOKILA BLVD 1120 ANDOVER PARK W 1150 ANDOVER PARK E 1180 ANDOVER PARK W 1185 ANDOVER PARK W 1201 ANDOVER PARK E 1205 ANDOVER PARK W 1210 ANDOVER PARK E 1224 ANDOVER PARK E 1227 ANDOVER PARK E 1228 ANDOVER PARK E 1231 ANDOVER PARK W 1232 ANDOVER PARK W 1233 ANDOVER PARK E 1251 ANDOVER PARK W 1325 4TH AVE 1940 1416 DODGE ST 325 18235 OLYMPIC AVE S 18500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 2310 130TH AVE NE B-103 441 COSTCO DR 4664 95TH AVE NE L 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR 5360 LANSDOWNE LN 5430 45TH AVE W 585 SAN PEDRO CV 6750 S 180TH ST 6804 S 180TH ST 6810 S 180TH ST 8100 SW 10TH ST 4000 999 LAKE DR PO BOX 105842 PO BOX 2500 PO -BOX 2720 PO BOX 5350 PO BOX 603 OWNER_CITY KAPOLEI TUKWILA TUKWILA SEATTLE TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA SEATTLE OMAHA TUKWILA TUKWILA BELLEVUE TUKWILA YARROW POINT SAINT LOUIS MERCER ISLAND SEATTLE WA SAN RAFAEL CA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA PLANTATION FL ISSAQUAH WA ATLANTA GA BROOMFIELD CO PORTLAND OR BEND OR MEDINA WA OWNER_STATE OWNER_ZIP HI 96707 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98101 NE 68179 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98005 WA 98188 WA 98004 MO 63134 WA 98040 98199 94901 98188 98188 98188 33324 98027 30348 80020 97208 97708 98039 LA PIANTA LLC WACO ENTERPRISE PO BOX 88028 TUKWILA WA PO BOX 88216 TUKWILA WA 98138 98138 • • Page 1 of 1 Teri Svedahl - Re: Mailing Labels From: To: Date: Subject: Attachments: Brandon Miles Teri Svedahl 05/27/2010 3:41 PM Re: Mailing Labels Teri - Does that include businesses as well? He`r:'e_is_the• notice. Brandon Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431-3684 fax (206) 431-3665 bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us »> Teri Svedahl 05/27/2010 1:56 PM »> Hi Brandon— they're ready to go. There's about 40 addresses does that sound right? »> Brandon Miles 05/27/2010 10:40 AM »> Hi Teri - I am going to need to have a mailing ready to go esday or get the addresses ready to go? The parcel number is 3523 Thanks, Brandon Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431-3684 fax (206) 431-3665 bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us ednesday. We will use a postcard. Can you 072. file://C:\Documents and Settings\Teri-S\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4BFE92B3tuk-... 05/27/2010 N AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development N.WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division Dept of Ecology, SEPA ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation `(\) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept `(Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES BP Olympic Pipeline ( J`Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ' ) Fire ( ) Police ( Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Sect 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept Renton Planning Dept 'City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ,( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal ,Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist 101,, ccs lrl44 Gt cfraf, 3/1 Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION Craft Architects on behalf of Shasta Beverage has filed applications for development of a 43,000 square foot tilt -up concrete addition to an existing 67,000 square foot building. The new addition will be used for storage and distribution of beverage projects. Site improvements include, new landscaping and 25 new parking stalls. The project site is already developed with pre -load and the site contains no sensitive areas. The project is located at 1227 Andover Park East Permits applied for include: L10-030 (Public Hearing Design Review) and E10-012 (Environmental Review) Other known required permits include: Building, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical Permits. Studies required with the applications include: None Known An environmental checklist has been submitted with the studies identified above. The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., June 16, 2010. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. Opportunity for additional oral and written public comments will be provided at a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, tentatively scheduled for June 25, 2010. To confirm this date call the Department of Community Development at (206) 431-3670. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. The decision on the design review application maybe appealed to the City Council. A Notice of Appeal must be filed within 14 days from the date of the Notice of Decision being issued. For further information on this proposal, contact Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: May 24, 2010 Notice of Completeness Issued: May 24, 2010 Notice of Application Issued: June 2, 2010 el a mien ., s. , nwu q mnn q A .R ■• 4) i. • ed !1 t ••• • 1111.111111111.1 II mid NEW II® Iv • 42, ■ II ■ C _ WAREHOUSE: S.F. - r -r r- ee r-cr ! I 1 i --- -4--4--------L +-±-+-+-+-±-+-+-±- .<[i, I I I I I I I I L --__L EXISTING WEHOUSE. 1 1 1 1 61,52 SF. Al 1 1 1 1 1 1 - T 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I T -T -IT -T -T-1- 1 1----i---kri-Ls1— - --i---1--+---i---1---+ -4--+-4- --lh-+---i----i-----i--4-- ..._.. 1 1 1 1 H EXISTING •1 1 1 1 1 L --k- 3° ` TT1 1 - 1 1 1 1 la 1 I 1 I1 I H 1 .1 m9. o9. r1 1111 111111 11111 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST gr 0 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING m .l��r Z 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX t s— ? BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • CONCORD, CA • TEMECULA, CA 0G �• www.barghausen.com <,./,v r/Nc ENG04- TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT Proposed Shasta Beverage Building Expansion RECEIVED MAY 242010 COMMUNI i Y DEVELOPMENT 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Prepared for: Shasta Beverages 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 May 19, 2010 Our Job No. 14770 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW Figure 1 — Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet Figure 2 — Site Location Figure 3 — Drainage Basins, Subbasins, and Site Characteristics Figure 4 — Soils Map 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 2.1 Analysis of the Core Requirements 2.2 Analysis of the Special Requirements 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN A. Existing Site Hydrology B. Developed Site Hydrology C. Performance Standards D. Flow Control System E. Water Quality System 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 7.0 OTHER PERMITS 8.0 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN A. Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Plan Analysis and Design 9.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 14770.002.doc 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The project site is located within a portion of Section 35, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Tukwila, Washington. More particularly, the site is located at 1227 Andover Park East in the South Center area of the City of Tukwila. The site is located in the Green River Drainage Basin. The proposed Shasta Beverages Building Expansion will consist of constructing a building addition on the north side of the existing Shasta Beverage development. Currently this area consists of a small asphalt storage facility with the vast majority of the site for the proposed building expansion consisting of grassed areas. In addition to the building expansion, a small roadway approximately 20 feet in width will be brought along the northern side of the building adjacent to the northern property line to connect up to the far northwest corner of the site where there are railroad tracks. Under pre -developed conditions the total area of grass is 1.12 acres and impervious asphalt surfacing of 0.16 acre, totaling 1.28 acres of area of be developed. Under developed conditions there is 0.07 acre of landscaping considered till grass and 1.21 acres of impervious surface, mostly building rooftop. As allowed by the City of Tukwila for projects in this area of the City, Level 1 flow control detaining to the existing condition such that the pre -developed condition consists of till grass and a small amount of impervious surface, and the post -developed condition will consist of the land cover as proposed. The required water quality menu to be followed is the Basic Water Quality Menu and this project is proposing a wet vault located below the live storage in a wet/detention vault, all to meet the requirements of the City of Tukwila. 14770.002.doc FIGURE 1 TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project Owner Shasta Beverages Phone Address 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 Project Engineer Ali Sadr Company Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Phone (425) 251-6222 Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Landuse Services Subdivision / Short Subd. / UPD ® Building Services M/F / Commercial / SFR ® Clearing and Grading ❑ Right -of -Way Use ❑ Other Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name Shasta Building Expansion DDES Permit # Location Township 23 North Range 4 East Section 35 Site Address 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS ❑ DFW HPA ❑ COE 404 O DOE Dam Safety ❑ FEMA Floodplain O COE Wetlands O Other ❑ Shoreline Management ® Structural Rockery O ESA Section 7 Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION Technical Information Type of Drainage Review (circle): Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: Report Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans) Full / Targeted / Type (circle one): Full / Modified / Large Site Small Site Date (include revision dates): Date of Final: Part 6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS Type (circle one): Standard / Complex / Preapplication / Experimental / Blanket Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2) Date of Approval: 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1 1/1/09 14770.001.doc KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS, Monitoring Required: Start Date: Yes / No Describe: Completion Date: Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Plan : Tukwila Special District Overlays: Drainage Basin: Green River via P17 Pond Stormwater Requirements: Level One flow control and basic water quality Part 9 ONSITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS ❑ River/Stream ❑ Lake ❑ Erosion Hazard ❑ Wetlands ❑ Landslide Hazard ❑ Closed Depression ❑ Coal Mine Hazard ❑ Floodplain ❑ Seismic Hazard ❑ Other ❑ Habitat Protection ❑ Steep Slope Part 10 SOILS Soil Type Urban Land Slopes Flat ❑ High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) ❑ Other Erosion Potential ❑ Sole Source Aquifer ❑ Seeps/Springs ❑ Additional Sheets Attached 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 2 1/1/09 14770.001.doc KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS REFERENCE ❑ Core 2 — Offsite Analysis ❑ Sensitive/Critical Areas ❑ SEPA ❑ Other LIMITATION / SITE CONSTRAINT ❑ Additional Sheets Attached Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET (provide one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold Discharge Area) Threshold Discharge Area: (name or description) Andover Park East Core Requirements (all 8 apply) Discharge at Natural Location Number of Natural Discharge Locations: 1 Offsite Analysis Level: 1 / 2 / 3 dated: N/A Flow Control Level: U / 2 / 3 or Exemption Number (incl. facility summary sheet) Small Site BMPs Conveyance System Spill containment located at: Vault Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: Contact Phone: After Hours Phone: Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: Private / Public If Private, Maintenance Log Required: Yes / No Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes / No Liability Water Quality Type: Basic / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog (include facility summary sheet) or Exemption No. Landscape Management Plan: Yes /No Special Requirements (as applicable) Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA / SDO / MDP / BP / LMP / Shared Fac. / None Requirements Name: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption / None 100 -year Base Blood Elevation (or range): Datum: Flood Protection Facilities Describe: N/A Source Control Describe landuse: (comm./industrial landuse) Describe any structural controls: 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 3 1/1/09 14770.001.doc KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Oil Control High -use Site: Yes / No Treatment BMP: Maintenance Agreement: Yes / No with whom? Other Drainage Structures Describe: Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS Type/Description MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION Type/Description AFTER CONSTRUCTION /1 Clearing Limits 1./ Stabilize Exposed Surfaces /1 Detention ❑ Infiltration ❑ Regional Facility ❑ Shared Facility ❑ Flow Control BMPs ❑ Other ❑ Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities /i1 Cover Measures I1 Wetpool ❑ Media Filtration ❑ Oil Control ❑ Spill Control ❑ Flow Control BMPs ❑ Other .1 Perimeter Protection r Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities /.1 Traffic Area Stabilization ❑ Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas /.1 Sediment Retention /.1 Surface Water Control ❑ Other ❑ Dewatering Control ❑ Dust Control ❑ Flow Control Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS (Note: Include Facility Summary and Sketch) Flow Control Type/Description Water Quality Type/Description Vault ❑ Biofiltration /1 Detention ❑ Infiltration ❑ Regional Facility ❑ Shared Facility ❑ Flow Control BMPs ❑ Other Vault I1 Wetpool ❑ Media Filtration ❑ Oil Control ❑ Spill Control ❑ Flow Control BMPs ❑ Other 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 4 1/1/09 14770.001.doc KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 15 EASEMENTS/TRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ❑ Drainage Easement ❑ Covenant ❑ Native Growth Protection Covenant ❑ Tract ❑ Other ►Z/ Cast in Place Vault ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Rockery > 4' High ❑ Structural on Steep Slope ❑ Other Part 17 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my knowledge the 'nformation provided h re is accurate. 4% 5-11-10 Signed/Date 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 5 1/1/09 14770.001.doc FIGURE 2 SITE LOCATION 188TH ST , 1.4th S186thPI 1.14 JS—S1 tet ' . • S 190th St 7500 T23N _1] T22N S 192nd .n 7800.r $ ;i S'200th St FIGURE 3 DRAINAGE BASINS, SUBBASINS, AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS STREET UGHT J-80% J-80% WATER VALVE no E2% 11.64 I P: 7-:•• /VIDA °410444/ t:II >411-0,C I.j Z 4G 9 . ,41 T, 4'. nal WATER VALVE GAS VALVE SEWER U4N110LE A RIM - 23.62 12' PIPE N - 16.49 12' PIPE 5 - 16.53 ,(Pa 8' PIPE E - 16.53 8' PIPE W . 16.53 (PIPES PVC OR D.I.) • ,'• 18' COTTONWOOD, .an RAMP RA 1 ' (• /r "MADp RE WLL A .51 2.1.43 CATCH BASIN RIM - 24.61 6' DI. E - 2331 FINISH FLOOR . 30.00 S OVERHEAD SPRINKLER ON BLOC GATE . E%ISTING BUILDING BUILDING TOP 52.27 0 10 20 40 SCALE • 111r �� • PROJECT INFORMATION TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 352304-9072 CURRENT OWNER TUPPER LYNN LAND USE GOVERNING JURISDICTION CRY OF IUKWIIA NOTE 1 UTILITIES ARE SHOWN PER SURFACE OBSERVATIONS ONLY. 2. THIS MAP IN NO WAY REPRESENTS A BOUNDARY SURVEY. BOUNDARIES SHOWN ARE FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES ONLY SURVEY INFORMATION PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE A FIELD TRAVERSE USING A TOPCON GR3' GPS ROVER AND EASE. AND TRSIBLE 1502' DATA COUECTOR SUPPLEMENTED WITH REID NOTES WAS PERFORMED. ESTABLISHING 114E ANGULAR DISTANCE. AND VERTICAL RELATDNSHIPS BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS, PROPERTY LINES. AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES A5 SHOWN HEREON. A TOPCON GR3' OPS ROVER AND BASE WAS USED TO CHECK AND ESTABUSH THE ELEVATION OF BENCHMARKS AND CONTROL POINTS. THE RESULTING DATA MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS FOR LAND BOUNDARY SURVEYS AS SET FORM IN WAC 332-130-090. DATES OF SURVEYS FIELD SURVEYS BY BARGHYISEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC CONDUCTED APRIL 2010. HORIZONTAL DATUM - BASIS OF BEARINGS NA083/CORS PER WASHINGTON STATE REFERENCE NETWORK. VERTICAL DATUM - NAVD88 PROJECT BENCHMARK WSDOT MONUMENT D 138 WSOOT 138 IS A BRASS DSK ON OVERPASS OF SOUTH 178TH STREET OVER INTERSTATE 5 NAVDU ELEV. - 218.40 FEET CATCH BASIN G -RIY-.3id9 18' CONC N _: 2038 15' CONC S- 20.44- . BUILDING CAROM, STREET UGHT J- BOX HYDRANT WATER VALVE CATCH BASIN D RIM . 22.71 18' CONC E . 19.27 18' CONC W - 19.33 GAS VALVE WATER VALVE GAS VALVE TELEPHONE MANHOLE SEVER MANHOLE A RIM - 25.39 12' PIPE N 18.16 12' PIPES- 18.20 8' PIPE E - 18.20 8' PIPE W - 1820 — (PIPES PVC OR D.1.) 1 a A 2 A I z N W Z 8 Q O N N OD g01ND00 I 1 _CV CCV n N CV N N N CO LaiIL 2 2 3 m r a R A 8 5 z • CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 -21Y 7.7.00 - 83 GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. APPROX. LOCATION OF EWIN0 8tP5 11.0 STORY DRAINAGE OEIENiION FIELD LOCATE (2 18' CONCRETE PIPE INSTALL LOCATION MID WATER OUAUTY VAULT INSTALL NEW 54' SOWN 1 OVER OF Elf. HYDRANT 108' ■ 20' WIDE EX. PIPE. CONNECT E%. P FROM SEE DE UAL ON SHEET C4 SOUTH AND EXTEND AS SHOWN FOR I CATCH WIN AT1X. W.S. EL - 19.5 RR/ - 24.71 CATT]i BA9N STATIC W.S. EL -19.5 DISCHARGE OF NEW VAULT. I 8' CONC N - 23.18 PoM 2434 BOTTOM VAULT EL -15.5 GRYi�-F145O * (MATCH �' ORAS) B' CONC E - 231 8' CONC E - 22.24 ^� F085N GRADE E1.-26.0! - 2S IE�t9.4 (FIELD VEfBFh _ (NO W_'E 1O W. FOtLND) CB 3, 1 8: CO Vi . 22: 93 NEW CB j2, TYPE 11 OEDI ��' Fm11. 27.^^ r; y ! IE 22. os. .%. x,-..�,y� •„�w - IF,IztcPErP�. ���• r, „,,,,,_,.......... i`a _' �' a II@ 7�7�: R"Et: El STRUT 0081 3-L105 R.0 WATER VALVE 1 I � Ter II ii di 28.0 128*A 219 LF 8' PVC ROOF DRAIN O 1.08 9 If12 PVC RROOF DRAW O 1.08• \\, t#4 lie, $ 910 ", }i- vI2. CPEP 1.001E 240 Lf r DI ROOF DRAIN 0 0.408 Na Caitlin D 1 OVERHEAD SPRINKLER ON BLOC GATE __J'-_' EX 8'CIP CRETE CURB 4, TYPE 2-48' (W/ SOLED UD) 610-26.50 46 1%19:A2:25 244 4.631 12' ' (!/c'S NOT CONNECT" �J 00106 BASIN D \CATCH BASIN F -� -4Hw+2. 20.05 20.05 18 18" 12' C": STEPS pvL_O 9 :o 10' 4 i tt) SY'uEN M A P �vE 080 VAL:S 20(6101 6411101E A 23.62 12' 12' RPE N- 16.49 12' PPE 5 18.53 8' PNE E- 18.53 8' PPEW- 16.53 (PIPES PVC OR D1) STREET 0GHT 3-005 Of. FIRE HYDRANT SER VALVE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN O RAI - 22.71 l8' C084C E - 19.27 1e C^LNC. W- 1933 -CATCH 6450! C R10 - 22.74 6 18' GONG E. - 19.37 d i 16' CONC W .- 19.37 al (DOES NOT (ONNEC1 �0111 BASIN E) WA: EX. 8' C.I. ROOF DRAIN PIPE TO 8E REMOVED AND EX. ROOF 00WNSPOUT TO BE RECONNECTED TO THE Ex, STUB. RECONNECT EX. ROOF DOWNSPOUT TO EX. MAIN AS stem CATCH BASIN 0 014 - 23.79 16' CONC N- 70.38 15' CONC. S - 20.44 EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN FF EL -30.0 1"EP MANHOLE 111 111 11 I1 11 1 11•1111 I I 30'.._- 6.0.8. ;< 060 VALYL WATER VALVE SEWER MANHOLE A RAA - 25.30 12' PIPE N- 18.16 12' PIPE S - 19.20 8' PIPE E - 18.20 8' PPEW- 1920 (PPES PVC OR 5.1) 65. FIRE HYDRANT SEWER N0.Vii01.8 A 104- 25.39 12' PPE N - 18.10 12' PPE S - 1830 8' PIPE F -18.20 8' PIPE W - 18.20 (PIPES PVC 0R 5.1.) 1 1 UJ 2 A o g g R i = THESE PUNS ARE APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF TU KWILA ENGINEERING DMSION. APPROVED 8Y: DATE APPROVED: FIGURE 4 SOILS MAP Map 5. Soils - Streams Green/Duwamish River Wetlands r�� j Tukwila City Limits ® Potential Annexation Areas Hydric Soll Units Hydric Excessively drained Somewhat excessively drained Moderately well drained Well drained n Somewhat poorly drained Poorly drained Very poorly drained No classification AgB Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy foam, 6 to 15 percent slopes AgD Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes AkF Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep Amb Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes AmC Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes An Arents, Everett material BeC Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes BeD Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes BeF Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes Bh Br Bu Cb Ea Bellingham silt loam Briscot silt loam Buckley silt loam Coastal beaches Earlmont silt loam EvB Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes EvC Everett gravelly sandy foam, 5 to 15 percent slopes EvD Everett gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes EwC Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy foams, 6 to 15 percent scopes InA Indianola loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes InC Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes InD Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes KpB Kitsap silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes KpC Kitsap silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes KpD Kitsap silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes Ma Mixed alluvial land NeC Neilton very gravelly loamy sand, 2 to 15 percent slopes Ng Nk No Or Os Newberg silt loam Nooksack silt loam Norma sandy loam Orcas peat Oridia silt loam OvC OvaU gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes OvD OvaU gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Source: King County Soil Survey (SSURGO), City of Tukwila GIS. Note: SSURGO data is not available for the northern portion of Tukwila; this area is not mapped. OvF Ovall gravelly loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes PITS Pits Pc Pilchuck loamy fine sand Pk Pilchuck fine sandy loam Pu Py RaC RaD RdC RdE Re Rh Sh Sk Sm Sn So Sr Su Tu Ur W Wo Puget silty day loam Puyallup fine sandy loam Ragnar fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Ragnar fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Ragnar-Indianola association, sloping Ragnar-Indianola association, moderately steep Renton silt loam Riverwash Sammamish silt loam Seattle muck Shalcar muck Si silt loam Snohomish silt loam Snohomish silt loam, thick surface variant Sultan silt loam Tukwila muck Urban land Water Woodinville silt loam 0 2,500 5,000 AmC Feet 10,000 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 2.1 Analysis of the Eight Core Requirements Core Requirement No. 1: Discharge at the Natural Location. Response: This project will discharge at the same location it does under existing conditions, with the ultimate downstream drainage point being the P17 Pond, which discharges into the Lower Green River. The City is well aware of the downstream drainage course from this project site. An off-site analysis is prepared in Section 3.0 of this report. Core Requirement No. 2: Off -Site Analysis. Response: The City has indicated since they know full well the downstream drainage course from this project site then a brief overview can be given for the downstream drainage analysis for this project and this is included in Section 3.0 of this report. Core Requirement No. 3: Flow Control. Response: The City of Tukwila has also indicated that Level 1 flow control is the flow control standard to be utilized for this portion of the City of Tukwila and that the detention vault should be sized to detain from the pre -developed condition as it exists currently, which is the vast majority of the site consisting of till grass area. Please refer to Section 4.0 of this TIR for a complete description of the flow control sizing methodology utilized for this development. Core Requirement No. 4: Conveyance System. Response: The conveyance system was sized for this project by using the Modified Rational Method and the 100 -year precipitation. Please see section 5.0 of the TIR for the basin map and calculations. Core Requirement No. 5: Erosion and Sediment Control. Response: Erosion and sediment control measures will be outlined in the plans for this development since the clearing limits will be specified, cover measures will be instituted, perimeter protection in the form of silt fence will be installed, traffic area stabilization will be created with the use of a rock construction entrance and regular street sweeping, sediment retention will be provided on site to the extent allowed by site constraints, etc. An SWPP Plan will be provided since the site is over an acre in size, all in accordance with the Department of Ecology requirements which will be followed during construction to the extent required by the Department of Ecology with monitoring of discharge from the site. Core Requirement No. 6: Maintenance and Operations. Response: Since this project will have its storm drainage facilities maintained by other parties, a Maintenance and Operations Manual will be created for this development and is included in Section 10.0 of this Technical Information Report. Core Requirement No. 7: Financial Guarantees and Liability. Response: All financial guarantees and liability requirements of the City of Tukwila will be met with this development and provided prior to the start of construction. 14770.002.doc Core Requirement No. 8: Water Quality. Response: The City of Tukwila has already indicated that this site is located within a Basic Water Quality area and this project is proposing a wet vault located below the live storage in a wet/detention vault, all meeting the Basic Water Quality Menu and will be much more than what is required since the vast majority of the site is rooftops, which does not need water quality treatment. Therefore, the site is providing a higher level of water quality than would normally be required for this site. 2.2 Analysis of the Five Special Requirements Special Requirement No. 1: Other Adopted Area -Specific Requirements. Response: The City of Tukwila has outlined all of the flow control and water quality requirements for this portion of the City; therefore, this development might lie within an area with a Master Drainage Plan. Although it is not known whether that is the case or not, the requirements of this drainage basin are being provided. Special Requirement No. 2: Flood Hazard Area Delineation. Response: This proposed project does not Iie within a Flood Hazard Area; therefore, this Special Requirement does not apply. Special Requirement No. 3: Flood Protection Facilities. Response: This project does not rely on an existing flood protection facility nor is it proposed to modify or construct a new flood protection facility. Special Requirement No. 4: Source Controls. Response: Source controls will be applied to this project site in accordance with the King County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual and King County Code Section 9.12 such that the parking lot will be swept regularly and the owner of the project will be educated about the proper use of fertilizers and pesticides. Special Requirement No. 5: Oil Control. Response: This proposed project does not have high use site characteristics; therefore, this special requirement does not apply. 14770.002.doc 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS The off-site analysis for this project site was based on City provided maps, which indicate that the entire site drains to the north in the right-of-way of Andover Park East. The vast majority of the pipe in Andover Park East consisting of 42 -inch -diameter pipe, which discharges at Minkler Boulevard coursing easterly in a large ditch for approximately 1,350 feet with one culvert sized to 114 inches in the course of this ditch. The discharge location of this ditch is the P17 Pond, where runoff is collected and then pumped into the Green River almost immediately adjacent to the pond. The City has indicated there are no downstream conveyance problems with this downstream conveyance system and there is plenty of capacity in this system for development of this project. 14770.002.doc SENSITIVE AREAS MAP 1 Pas mitt Map 5 The mapping of areas of potential geologic instability is approximate. On site verification of topography and geology is necessary. Wetland and locations are approximate only and watercourses shown on this map have not been surveyed. Legend clip Tukwila City Limits Type 2 Shoreline Wetland e w Type 2 Shoreline Wetland Buffer (80') Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area * Type 2 Stream =MC Type 2 Stream in Pipe Type 3 Stream Type 3 Stream in Pipe Type 4 Stream 0 0 0 Type 4 Stream in Pipe Type 2 Watercourse Buffer (100') Type 3 Watercourse Buffer (80') Type 4 Watercourse Buffer (50') 200ft Shoreline Jurisdiction Slope Classifications Landslide potential is moderate; slope is between 15% & 240%3 underlain by relatively permeable sots. Landslide potential is high; slope is between 15% & 40%3 underlain by relatively impermeable soils or by bedrock; 3 also includesell areas sloping more than 40%. Landslide potential Is very high; indudes sloping areas with mappable zones of groundwater seepage and 4existing mappable landslde deposits regardless of slope. ska.a QgdTWga01a King Canty GIS 7/08 GIS * Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas shown are Salmon habitat enhancement projects completed or underway. The river itself is also a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area. FLOOD HAZARD AND GEOLOGIC AREA HAZARD MAP 12/06 Map 7 Flood Hazard and Geologic Hazard Areas GIS ILA \AMC] Source: King County GIS, City of Tukwila GIS Legend Scale: 1'=.500mile CD 100 -Year Floodplain Landslide Potential Slope Classifications El 2 Moderate: Slope is between 15% and 40%; underlain by permeable soils. E3 3 High: Slope Is between 15% and 40%; underlain by Impermeable soils/bedrock. t34 Very high; Includes areas with mappable zones of groundwater seepage and landslide deposits. Green/Duwamish River 101Shoreline Planning Area — Streets 1- ukwila City Limits Ij-UPotentIal Annexation Areas 4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN A. Existing Site Hydrology The existing site proposed to be developed further consists of parking lot surface and grassy vegetated areas, and are level for the most part except at the location where this project is proposing to construct a new building, which is mostly level, however it is approximately 2 to 3 feet higher than the parking lot immediately east of the proposed developed area. This creates a dock high loading area for the building and meets the finished floor of the existing building that it will tie into. There is a small area of impervious surface under existing conditions that will be included in the calculation for the pre -developed condition. B. Developed Site Hydrology Please refer to the Detention and Water Quality Sizing Criteria on the following pages of this report for the land cover criteria used in sizing the wet/detention vault proposed for this development. There is more impervious surface under developed condition than there is under the pre -developed condition and the City has indicated that the site has to detain from the existing condition on the site and not utilize a pre -developed condition of forested land cover. C. Performance Standards The area -specific flow control standard as determined by City of Tukwila for this project site is Level 1 flow_ control. The_applicable_conveyance_system_capacity_standard.is the. Modified Rational Method since this site is less than 10 acres in size. The area -specific water quality treatment menu followed for this project site was the Basic Water Quality Menu as delineated in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Tukwila. —L D. Flow Control System Please refer to the illustrative sketches of the flow control facility and its appurtenances located on the following pages of this report. In addition, the calculations for sizing the flow control facility based on the King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) methodology level one flow control standards are included. E. Water Quality System Once again, one on-site wet/detention vault will be used on this project. The location of the vault is shown on the following pages of this report. In addition, the calculations for sizing the wet vault portion of the vault, which meets the Basic Water Quality Menu as adopted by the City of Tukwila and as delineated further in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual, are included. 14770.002.doc DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY SIZING CRITERIA DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY SIZING CRITERIA Level 1 Flow Control Basic Water Quality Pre -Developed: Impervious = 0.16 Ac. Till Grass = 1.12 Ac. Total = 1.28 Ac. Developed: Impervious = 1.21 Ac. Till Grass = 0.07 Ac. Total = 1.28 Ac. 14770.002.doc WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS SIZE THE BASIC WET VAULT Vb = 3[0.9 A; + 0.25 At9](0.039) Vb = 3[(0.9)(1.21) + (0.25)(0.07)](0.039)(43,560) Vb = 5,640 CF 14770.002.doc LEVEL 1 FLOW CONTROL CALCULATIONS DATED MAY 18, 2010 KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea -Tac Computing Series : 14770pre.tsf Regional Scale Factor,: 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf Till Grass 1.12 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf Impervious 0.16 acres Total Area : 1.28 acres Peak Discharge: 0.312 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:14770pre.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:14770pre.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770pre.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:14770pre.pks Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea -Tac Computing Series : 14770dev.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf Till Grass 0.07 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf Impervious 1.21 acres Total Area : 1.28 acres Peak Discharge: 0.587 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:14770dev.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:14770dev.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:14770dev.pks Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command Size a Retention/Detention FACILITY Edit Facility Loading Time Series File:14770dev.tsf Time Series Found in Memory:14770dev.tsf Saving Retention/Detention Facility File:14770convey.rdf Starting Documentation File:C:\kc_swdm\kc_data\example\kcrts\14770convey.doc Time Series Found in Memory:14770dev.tsf Edit Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Edit Facility Time Series Found in Memory:14770dev.tsf Saving Retention/Detention Facility File:14770convey.rdf Starting Documentation File:C:\kc_swdm\kc_data\example\kcrts\14770convey.doc Time Series Found in Memory:14770dev.tsf . Edit Complete Retention/Detention Facility Design Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770pre.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.139 0.085 0.173 0.061 0.081 0.144 0.132 0.313 Computed Peaks 4 2/09/01 2:00 6 1/05/02 16:00 2 2/27/03 7:00 8 8/26/04 2:00 7 10/28/04 16:00 3 1/18/06 16:00 5 11/24/06 3:00 1 1/09/08 6:00 Flow Frequency Analysis Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.313 1 100.00 0.173 2 25.00 0.144 3 10.00 0.139 4 5.00 0.132 5 3.00 0.085 6 2.00 0.081 7 1.30 0.061 8 1.10 0.266 50.00 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 0.231 0.091 0.980 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.300 0.261 0.364 0.303 0.360 0.320 0.441 0.587 Computed 7 8 3 6 4 5 2 1 Peaks 2/09/01 1/05/02 12/08/02 8/26/04 10/28/04 1/18/06 10/26/06 1/09/08 2:00 16:00 18:00 2:00 16:00 16:00 0:00 6:00 Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.587 1 100.00 0.990 0.441 2 25.00 0.960 0.364 3 10.00 0.900 0.360 4 5.00 0.800 0.320 5 3.00 0.667 0.303 6 2.00 0.500 0.300 7 1.30 0.231 0.261 8 1.10 0.091 0.538 50.00 0.980 Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770rdout.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rate Rank (CFS) 0.143 0.066 0.120 0.070 0.085 0.144 0.237 0.498 Computed Peaks Flow Rates --- Time of Peak 4 2/09/01 8 1/05/02 5 3/06/03 7 8/24/04 6 1/05/05 3 1/18/06 2 11/24/06 1 1/09/08 19:00 18:00 20:00 0:00 10:00 22:00 5:00 9:00 Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - (CFS) 0.498 0.237 0.144 0.143 0.120 0.085 0.070 0.066 0.411 (ft) 3.71 3.63 3.59 3.57 2.86 2.21 1.50 1.36 3.69 Rank Return Prob Period 1 100.00 0.990 2 25.00 0.960 3 10.00 0.900 4 5.00 0.800 5 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0.500 7 1.30 0.231 8 1.10 0.091 50.00 0.980 Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: 108.00 ft Facility Width: 20.00 ft Facility Area: 2160. sq. ft Effective Storage Depth: 3.60 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 19.40 ft Storage Volume: 7776. cu. ft Riser Head: 3.60 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1.45 0.108 2 2.35 1.09 0.036 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac -ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 19.40 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.02 19.42 43. 0.001 0.007 0.00 0.03 19.43 65. 0.001 0.010 0.00 0.05 19.45 108. 0.002 0.012 0.00 0.06 19.46 130. 0.003 0.014 0.00 0.08 19.48 173. 0.004 0.016 0.00 0.09 19.49 194. 0.004 0.017 0.00 0.11 19.51 238. 0.005 0.018 0.00 0.12 19.52 259. 0.006 0.020 0.00 0.22 19.62 475. 0.011 0.027 0.00 0.32 19.72 691. 0.016 0.032 0.00 0.42 19.82 907. 0.021 0.037 0.00 0.52 19.92 1123. 0.026 0.041 0.00 0.62 20.02 1339. 0.031 0.045 0.00 0.72 20.12 1555. 0.036 0.048 0.00. 0.82 20.22 1771. 0.041 0.052 0.00 0.92 20.32 1987. 0.046 0.055 0.00 1.02 20.42 2203. 0.051 0.058 0.00 1.12 20.52 2419. 0.056 0.060 0.00 1.22 20.62 2635. 0.060 0.063 0.00 1.32 20.72 2851. 0.065 0.065 0.00 1.42 20.82 3067. 0.070 0.068 0.00 1.52 20.92 3283. 0.075 0.070 0.00 1.62 21.02 3499. 0.080 0.072 0.00 1.72 21.12 3715. 0.085 0.075 0.00 1.82 21.22 3931. 0.090 0.077 0.00 1.92 21.32 4147. 0.095 0.079 0.00 2.02 21.42 4363. 0.100 0.081 0.00 2.12 21.52 4579. 0.105 0.083 0.00 2.22 21.62 4795. 0.110 0.085 0.00 2.32 21.72 5011. 0.115 0.087 0.00 2.35 21.75 5076. 0.117 0.087 0.00 2.36 21.76 5098. 0.117 0.088 0.00 2.37 21.77 5119. 0.118 0.089 0.00 2.38 21.78 5141. 0.118 0.090 0.00 2.40 21.80 5184. 0.119 0.092 0.00 2.41 21.81 5206. 0.120 0.094 0.00 2.42 21.82 5227. 0.120 0.097 0.00 2.43 21.83 5249. 0.120 0.098 0.00 2.44 21.84 5270. 0.121 0.099 0.00 2.54 21.94 5486. 0.126 0.105 0.00 2.64 22.04 5702. 0.131 0.110 0.00 2.74 22.14 5918. 0.136 0.114 0.00 2.84 22.24 6134. 0.141 0.119 0.00 2.94 22.34 6350. 0.146 0.122 0.00 3.04 22.44 6566. 0.151 0.126 0.00 3.14 22.54 6782. 0.156 0.130 0.00 3.24 22.64 6998. 0.161 0.133 0.00 3.34 22.74 7214. 0.166 0.136 0.00 3.44 22.84 7430. 0.171 0.139 0.00 3.54 22.94 7646. 0.176 0.142 0.00 3.60 23.00 7776. 0.179 0.144 0.00 3.70 23.10 7992. 0.183 0.455 0.00 3.80 23.20 8208. 0.188 1.020 0.00 3.90 23.30 8424. 0.193 1.750 0.00 4.00 23.40 8640. 0.198 2.550 0.00 4.10 23.50 8856. 0.203 2.830 0.00 4.20 23.60 9072. 0.208 3.090 0.00 4.30 23.70 9288. 0.213 3.330 0.00 4.40 23.80 9504. 0.218 3.550 0.00 4.50 23.90 9720. 0.223 3.760 0.00 4.60 24.00 9936. 0.228 3.950 0.00 4.70 24.10 10152. 0.233 4.140 0.00 4.80 24.20 10368. 0.238 4.320 0.00 4.90 24.30 10584. 0.243 4.490 0.00 5.00 24.40 10800. 0.248 4.650 0.00 5.10 24.50 11016. 0.253 4.810 0.00 5.20 24.60 11232. 0.258 4.970 0.00 5.30 24.70 11448. 0.263 5.120 0.00 5.40 24.80 11664. 0.268 5.260 0.00 5.50 24.90 11880. 0.273 5.400 0.00 5.60 25.00 12096. 0.278 5.540 0.00 Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu -Ft) (Ac -Ft) 1 0.59 ******* 0.50 3.71 23.11 8008. 0.184 2 0.31 ******* 0.24 3.63 23.03 7841. 0.180 3 0.32 0.14 0.14 3.59 22.99 7749. 0.178 4 0.30 ******* 0.14 3.57 22.97 7701. 0.177 5 0.36 ******* 0.12 2.86 22.26 6174. 0.142 6 0.20 0.09 0.08 2.21 21.61 4778. 0.110 7 0.30 ******* 0.07 1.50 20.90 3238. 0.074 8 0.26 ******* 0.07 1.36 20.76 2934. 0.067 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:14770dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:14770rdout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: Peak Reservoir Elev: Peak Reservoir Storage: 0.587 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 0.498 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 3.71 Ft 23.11 Ft 8008. Cu -Ft 0.184 Ac -Ft Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770rdout.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 0.143 0.066 0.120 0.070 0.085 0.144 0.237 0.498 Computed Peaks Peak Flow Rates --- Rank Time of Peak 4 2/09/01 8 1/05/02 5 3/06/03 7 8/24/04 6 1/05/05 3 1/18/06 2 11/24/06 1 1/09/08 19:00 18:00 20:00 0:00 10:00 22:00 5:00 9:00 Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (ft) Period 0.498 3.71 1 100.00 0.990 0.237 3.63 2 25.00 0.960 0.144 3.59 3 10.00 0.900 0.143 3.57 4 5.00 0.800 0.120 2.86 5 3.00 0.667 0.085 2.21 6 2.00 0.500 0.070 1.50 7 1.30 0.231 0.066 1.36 8 1.10 0.091 0.411 3.69 50.00 0.980 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:14770dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:14770rdout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.587 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.498 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Reservoir Stage: 3.71 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 23.11 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 8008. Cu -Ft 0.184 Ac -Ft Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770rdout.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.143 4 2/09/01 19:00 0.066 8 1/05/02 18:00 0.120 5 3/06/03 20:00 - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (ft) Period 0.498 3.71 1 100.00 0.990 0.237 3.63 2 25.00 0.960 0.144 3.59 3 10.00 0.900 0.070 7 8/24/04 0:00 0.143 3.57 4 5.00 0.800 0.085 6 1/05/05 10:00 0.120 2.86 5 3.00 0.667 0.144 3 1/18/06 22:00 0.085 2.21 6 2.00 0.500 0.237 2 11/24/06 5:00 0.070 1.50 7 1.30 0.231 0.498 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.066 1.36 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.411 3.69 50.00 0.980 WET/DETENTION VAULT PLAN 15.15 BOTTOM OF VAIA. 15.15, BOTTOM OF VAULT \/? STORMWATER VAULT SECTIONS AND DETAILS FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 15.15 Barrow OF VAULT 24' DIAMETER •♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦A�♦•♦♦. MAMIE ACCESS .11, .♦.I.♦. 15.15 /BOTfdI OF VAULT 14.65 ! 15.15 CELL 2 3'x10' REMOVABLE CARATE Z CELL 1 Boum OF VAULT\ OF 14.11 / /—REMOVABLE PANEL MADE OF STAINLESS STEEL W030. / FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC •♦•♦•.•♦V.♦♦♦. 15.16 • • ,. . . .. .. .. �♦�♦�.�♦�♦�♦�. I.... A•♦•.•♦•.A BOUM OF VAULT • • 76' 32' 1 106'11 PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1-.5' 5x10' REMOVABLE GRATE ///l///// i APPROXIMATE PROPOSED GRADE 6M._M1-11-23.0 12• CUT IE -19.4 EL -20.75 CO1 2 CELL 1 1. ... 807104 OF WALL EL -15.15 SECTION B -B 14.65 SCALE 1-.5' N 1'.:' V 15.15 BOTTOM OF VAULT l2 DIAMETER VENT QYP.) ML FOUR CORNERS 15.15 BOTTOM OF VAULT PAVED ROAD SURFACE BOTTOM OF UO ELEVATION -23.5 MAX WS EL -23.0 12' MIN 2' MIN VAULT ACCESS UD RISER REMOVABLE WATER -TIGHT COUPLING OF FLANGE PLATE WELDED TO ELBOW WITH ORIFICE AS SPECIE1ED FI BOW DETAIL. 4- ELBOW IE=21.75 ORIFICE -1 3 32 ENA PIPE SUPPORTS: 3'x0.090 GAGE BOLTED OR IMBEDDED 2' 91 WALT. 0 MAX. 3'-0 SPACING (MIN. ONE SUPPORT) CLEANOUT GATE B DIA SHEAR GATE FIELD VERIFY LOCATION FOR AI MIDLEETO Of OF VAULT CLEANOUT SHEARGATE HANDLE TTO�BE HUNG FROM AAGCESSFOR 2- MW. IE -19.40 FLOW RESTRICTOR RISER IE -19.40 12- CUP STANDPIPE RESTRICTOR PLATE WITH ORIFICE DIA - 1 7/16' NOT TO SCALE EL -15.1 OF VAULT EL - SECTION A -A SCALE: 1--5' H 1--2' V 1 THESE PLANS ARE APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF TURW A ENGINEERING ENVISION. APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: 1 111 11 lig 0j 08 F. iile:P:\14000s\14770\ engineering \11770—d3.dwa Date/Time:5/20/2010 3:78 Pu z J a z 0 OBIYOp IINIR9S llli4a1l8iY61/11RNOWi6li0O6R11111 i IIINNIMIN1110 Q1111511V ,1111 II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICIItlili HO liim lil'iililililiiiiiiiiii:u�;i aw 020114 r '947 !hail g vv:791 1:1E 81111!: imopil PHAMA$ ---�-:_— -PARK 14770 Shod al 7 it MAilArg 2,',, 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CARL ENGINEERING. LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, OMRONNENIAL SERVICES Deelonsa Dram —AK en.mea,—_At Appowd _Ai Date - Sealc Nmlmntal ryn *Nicol N/A \1UN10s\14770\mni,uerinn 11770—mrtMm Onley ,5/71 /N010 alit AY Senlorfl 4A11450 mot RM *W. ---- EX 42971 — 0041 141 4 77% For: SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA 2!.-ue3 EGEgt RrAdan T GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDITION 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The conveyance system for this project site was sized in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual such that the Modified Rational Method was utilized to size the conveyance elements. To be conservative, a 100 -year precipitation was utilized in determining peak flow rates that would course through the pipes and determine pipe sizes for this development. A Manning's 'n' value of 0.014 was used and an initial time of concentration of 6.3 minutes was also utilized. This is a conservative methodology and usually provides for a bigger pipe flow than would be required under actual conditions. Please refer to the following pages of this report for the Basin Map as well as calculations to size the conveyance system. 14770.002.doc PIPE CONVEYANCE BASIN MAP 2 gh mw v o1 rA j yi11111111,11111111110Maral nnmm ur 1 11 it{oI. LL\XN \�\\��:..m "iii m Al STA II gAmm 1111!: i.opil HAMA • # EgrltA Job Number 14770 01 7 10 ai --SS TAAiLg Eggt.a 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING. UND PUNNING. SURVEYING. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Osobobbo Drown _DIM Chocked Approred L Dot. — Horizontal 1'.w' Vertical N/A 140001A1477(1\ obninabrinn‘1477fl—nen don Onln nim. -5/7I /7(1111 t-fl1 AN Srnn-fl 4 d 4 $) nun' TM1 Ymf ---- For• IX. 41'70. --- 7 _ 4 G gym• AFmr F-- t n v v t aayu nom � SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA Ag fbrAolon It •• 0 33 cn x v � z 0 y z v td co • 0 • . 13• p D cn z D ^z \ L T z D at 4rbk V GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDITION PIPE CONVEYANCE CALCULATIONS JOB NAME: SHASTA BEVERAGES JOB/P. 14770 FILE NO.: 14770-100.XLS A= Contributing Area (Ac) C= Runoff Coefficient Tc= Time of Concentration (min) 1= Intensity at Tc (in/hr) d= Diameter of Pipe (in) L= Length of Pipe (ft) D= Water Depth at Qd (in) FROM TO A ROOF 1 CB1 s CB1 0.16 0.40 CB2 0.19 0.50 ROOF2 CB2 0.82 1.00 CB2 CB3 CB4 CB3 C84 VAULT 0.04 1.18 0.05 1.00 0.00 48.40 14770-100.x?s BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS - PIPE FLOW CALCULATOR using the Rational Method & Manning Formula KING COUNTY DESIGN FOR 100 YEAR STORM NOTE ENTER DEFAULTS AND STORM DATA BEFORE BEGINNING DEFAULTS C= 0.9 n= 0.014 d= 12 Tc= 6.3 Od= Design Flow (cfs) Of= Full Capacity Flow (cfs) Vd= Velocity at Design Flow (fps) Vf= Velocity at Full Flow (fps) s= Slope of pipe (%) n= Manning Roughness Coefficient Tt= Travel Time at Vd (min) L 240 166 10 93 108 5 d Tc n C COEFFICIENTS FOR THE RATIONAL METHOD 'If -EQUATION SUM A STORM Ar Br 2YR 1.58 0.58 10YR 2.44 0.64 25YR 2.66 0.65 50YR 2.75 0.65 100YR 2.61 0.63 A'C 8 6.3 0.014 0.9 12 8.1 0.014 0.65 12 6.3 0.014 0.9 12 12 12 9.2 0.014 9.5 0.014 9.9 0.014 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.16 0.35 0.82 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.12 0.74 0.04 0.05 0.00 SUM A -C 1 PRECIP= Ar= Br - 3.95 2.61 0.63 Od Of Od/Qf Dld D VE Vd 0.14 3.23 0.47 0.71 0.656 0.593 4.75 2.03 2.17 0.27 2.75 0.74 2.34 0.315 0.384 4.60 2.98 2.64 0.74 3.23 2.39 3.31 0.722 0.629 7.55 4.21 4.59 1.04 2.55 2.65 3.59 0.739 0.639 7.67 4.58 5.01 1.09 2.50 2.71 3.31 0.820 0.689 8.26 4.21 4.70 1.09 2.43 2.64 23.01 0.115 0.230 2.76 29.32 19.35 Page 1 Tt 1.84 1.05 0.04 0.31 0.38 0.00 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES I`f7 io PREPARED FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. May 19, 2010 cott Adel, Senior Project Geologist Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Principal GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SHASTA BEVERAGES WAREHOUSE ADDITION 1227 ANDOVER PARK EAST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ES -1581.01 Earth Solutions NW, LLC 1805 -136TH Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 Toll Free: 866-336-8710 May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Shasta Beverages, Inc. 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Mr. Nick Heaton Dear Mr. Heaton: Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Shasta Beverages Warehouse Addition, 1227 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington". Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the test pit locations, the site is underlain primarily by about eight to ten feet of medium dense silty sand, sand and silt fill. Perched groundwater was observed at a depth of about seven feet below existing grade at test pit locations TP -2 and TP -5 during the fieldwork (April 2010). It appears that the groundwater is perched above a dense fill layer consisting of silty sand with gravel, which may represent a former parking area. Based on the results of our study, the proposed warehouse addition can be supported on conventional foundation systems bearing on structural fill. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill will be necessary. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC for P ect Geolo 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES -1581.01 PAGE. INTRODUCTION( ., 1 General 1 Prosect Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS .. 2 Su ce 2 Subsurface 2 Geologic Setting:::.::- 3 3 Groundwater DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Temporary Erosion Control 4 Site Stripping Recommendations 4 In-situ Soils 4 Structural Fill 4 Foundations 5 Seismic Design Considerations 5 Slab -On -Grade Floors 6 Retaining. Walls 6 Drainage 7 Excavations and Slopes 7 Utility Trench Backfill 7 Pavement Sections 8 JJMITATIONS 8 Additional Services ...... 8 GRAPHICS PLATE 1 PLATE 2 PLATE 3 PLATE 4 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B VICINITY MAP TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DEATAIL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Subsurface Exploration Test Pit Logs Laboratory Test Results Earth Solutions NW, LLC GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SHASTA BEVERAGES WAREHOUSE ADDITION 1227 ANDOVER PARK EAST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ES -1581.01 INTRODUCTION General, This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the warehouse addition to be constructed along the north side . of the existing bottling/warehouse facility located at 1227 Andover Park East in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this study was, to develop ,geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. Our scope of services for completing this geotechnical engineering study addressed the following: • Conducting subsurface explorations within accessible portions of the development. envelope; • Conduct engineering analyses, and • Preparation of this report The following documents/maps were reviewed as part of our report preparation: • Architectural and Site Egress Plan, Sheet A1.1, prepared by Craft Architects, dated May 7, 2010; • Geologic Map of King County, Booth et al, 2006, and; • King County USDA Soil Conservation Survey (SCS). Protect Description A 40,000 square foot warehouse addition and associated improvements will be constructed along the north side of an existing bottling/warehouse structure. ESNW understands the existing building was constructed in the late 1960's and that the area of the currently proposed addition was filled at the same time to approximately match the finish floor elevation of the existing building. The new addition finish floor will match the existing structure. Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 2 At the time this report was prepared, specific building Toad values were not available. However, based on our experience with similar developments we anticipate wall loads will range from about 4 to 6 kips per foot and column loads are anticipated to range from about. 80 to 120 kips. Slab -on -grade loading will likely be on the order of 250 pounds per square foot (psf). ESNW understands along the south side of the new addition, columns will be constructed a distance of three feet from the existing north wall. The new roof will cantilever to meet the existing roof system to provide weather -proofing. Based on the existing topography, grading will be relatively minimal across the majority of the site, and will likely be limited to cutting to design footing elevations. The remainder of the site will be developed with asphalt paved drive lanes. If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to confirm that our geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is located on the west side of Andover Park East in Tukwila, Washington. The approximate location of the property is illustrated on Plate 1 (Vicinity Map) included in this study. A commercial bottling/warehouse structure occupies the southem portion of the site. The site is bordered to the north and south by commercial development, to the east by Andover Park East and to the west by a railroad spur. The existing site topography is relatively level and consists of a fill pad which extends roughly to the property boundaries to the north and west, to a parking lot to the east and abuts the bottling/warehouse structure to the south. Subsurface An ESNW representative observed, logged and sampled five test pits excavated by an excavator and operator contracted to ESNW. The approximate locations of the test pits are depicted on the Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2). Please refer to the test pit Togs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Fill was observed at all test locations and extended to depths ranging from about to 8 to 11 feet below existing grade. The fill generally consisted of silty sand (Unified Soil Classification SM), poorly graded sand with silt (SP -SM) and silt (ML): A distinct layer of dense silty sand with gravel was observed at test pit locations TP -1, TP -2 and TP -5 from about seven to eight and one-half feet below existing ground elevations. Below this layer, medium dense sandy silt (ML), silty sand (SM) and poorly graded sand with silt (SP -SM) native soils were encountered extending to the maximum exploration depth of 13 feet below existing grades. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 3 Geologic Setting The referenced geologic map resource identifies alluvial (QaI) deposits throughout the site and surrounding areas. The King County Soil Survey (SCS) identifies Urban Land (Ur) soils across the site. Urban Land soils are those used for large-scale or regional grading areas such as the commercial district of Tukwila. The soils are variable with respect to gradation due to the variation of source material used. This soil unit presents a slight to moderate erosion hazard and exhibits slow runoff. The soil conditions below the current pad fill zone encountered at the test pit locations are generally consistent with the published geologic and soil designations. Groundwater Groundwater was observed at the test pit locations TP -2 and TP -5 at a depth of seven feet relative to existing grades during the fieldwork (April 2010). The groundwater appeared to be perched along the dense fill layer encountered at about seven feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates are higher during the wetter, winter months. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of the geotechnical engineering study, construction of the proposed warehouse addition at the subject site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The recommendations provided in this report are based in part on the conditions encountered at the test pit locations, engineering and analyses, our understanding of the proposed project and our experience with similar projects. This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Shasta Beverages, Inc., and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. Earth Sotutlons NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 4 Site Preparation and Earthwork Prior to construction we anticipate site preparation will include implementation of temporary erosion control, stripping topsoil and otherwise organic materials and removal of structural improvements within the current outdoor storage area. Temporary Erosion Control Temporary construction entrances and drive lanes, consisting of at least 12 inches of quarry spalls can be considered in order to minimize off-site soil tracking and to provide a stable access entrance surface, as necessary. Erosioncontrol measures should consist of silt fencing placed along the down gradient side of the site. Soil stockpiles should be protected to reduce soil erosion. Site Stripping Recommendations Topsoil and organic -rich soil was encountered generally within the upper three to four inches at the test pit locations. ESNW should observe stripping operations to confirm adequate removal of organic soil. In-situ Soils The soils at the majority of the test pit locations which would likely be exposed during grading activities consist of silty sand and sand and have a moderate to high sensitivity to moisture and were generally in a moist condition at the time of the explorations (April 2010). Soils encountered during site excavations that are over the acceptable optimum moisture content will require moisture conditioning prior toplacement and compaction. Conversely, soils that are substantially below the optimum moisture content may require moisture conditioning through the addition of water prior to use as structural fill. From a geotechnical standpoint, the soils encountered at the test pit locations are generally suitable for use as structural fill provided the soil moisture content is at or up to 3 to 4 percent above the optimum moisture content The use on-site soils as structural fill during the wet season will be difficult. A contingency should be included in the project budget for the use of imported soil should the on-site soil be too wet for use as structural fill. Structural Fill Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab -on -grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be placed in loose lifts of 12 inches or Tess and be compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D-1557). Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 5 Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction. Foundations Based on the results of our study, the warehouse addition can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on existing structural fill. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill, may be necessary. Provided foundations will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be used for design of new foundations: • Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf • Passive earth pressure 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) • Coefficient of friction 0.4 A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. The above passive pressure and friction values include a factor -of - safety of 1.5. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch and differential settlement of about one-half inch is anticipated. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. The new loads associated with the addition will result in some settlement of the existing structure. Given the competent condition and thickness of the fill underlying the site, settlement of the existing structure is estimated to be in the range of one quarter to one half inch. Seismic.IDesian Considerations The 2006 International Building Code specifies several soil profiles that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the soil conditions observed at the test sites, Site Class E, from table 1613.5.2, should be used for design. In our opinion, the alluvial soils underlying the fill on the site are susceptible to liquefaction. In our opinion, the fill soil is not susceptible to liquefaction given its relative density and the lack of an established groundwater table. In our opinion, settlements resulting from liquefaction of the underlying alluvial soil are anticipated to be in the range of one to two inches. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 6 Slab -On -Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors for the proposed warehouse should be supported on a firm and unyielding subgrade consisting of competent native soil or structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material should have a fines content of 5 percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. If a vapor barrier is to be utilized it should be a material specifically designed for use as a vapor barrier and should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Retaining Walls Retaining walls must be designed to resist earth The following parameters can be used for retaining • Active earth pressure (yielding wall) • At -rest earth pressure (restrained wall) • Traffic surcharge for passenger vehicles (where applicable) • Passive resistance • Coefficient of friction • Seismic surcharge pressures and applicable surcharge loads. wall design: 35 pcf (equivalent fluid) 50 pcf 70 psf (rectangular distribution) 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) 0.4 6H (where H equals retained height) Additional surcharge loading from adjacent foundations, sloped backfill, or other loads should be included in the retaining wall design. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design. Retaining walls should be backfilled with free draining material that extends along the height of the wall, and a distance of at least 18 inches behind the wall. The site sand and gravel soils can be considered free draining provided no topsoil is used or mixed with the backfill materials. The upper one foot of the wall backfill can consist of a less permeable soil, if desired. A perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall, and connected to an approved discharge location. A typical retaining wall drainage detail is provided on Plate 3. Earth Solutions NW, LLC ES -1581.01 Page 7 Drainane Groundwater was observed at the test pit locations TP- 2 and TP -5 at a depth of about seven feet during the fieldwork (April 2010). As such, perched groundwater should be anticipated in deeper site excavations particularly during the winter and spring months. Temporary measures to control surface water runoff during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and sumps, as necessary. Based on the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test pit locations, extensive dewatering of excavations will likely not be necessary. In our opinion, footing drains should be installed around the addition perimeter. A typical foundation drain detail is provided as Plate 4. Excavations and Slopes The Federal Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) provide soil classification in terms of temporary slope inclinations. Based on the soil conditions encountered at the test pit locations, the fill is classified as Type C by OSHANVISHA. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils must be sloped no steeper than 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). Temporary shoring may be necessary to support excavations if the recommended temporary slope inclination cannot be achieved. Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2H:1V, or flatter, and should be planted with vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. The geotechnical engineer should observe temporary and permanent slopes to confirm the slope inclinations, and to provide additional excavation and slope recommendations, as necessary. Utility Trench Backfill In our opinion, the soils anticipated to be exposed in utility excavations will be generally suitable for support of utilities. Organic or highly compressible soils encountered in the trench excavations should not be used for supporting utilities. Please refer to the 'Site Preparation and Earthwork' section of this report for recommendations regarding the use of on-site soil as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable City of Tukwila specifications. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 8 Pavement Sections The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying ; Earth Solutions NW, LLC E Jsstt.. ienue F j N _5 (ETtls s , rsn:i st 5etL, cam. 1 .75 vN � • i �l � . I?rrd r4 Ci Intel f7 5 - '73‘.1 ; 7�in' 25 NORTH Reference: King County Map 655 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 2009 NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Earth Solutions NWILI. earth Solutions NWac ebtechnical Engineering, Construction Monitoring and Environmental Sciences Vicinity Map Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 1 LEGEND TP -1—,1 —Approximate Location of � ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No. ES -1581.01, May 2010 V/A Subject Property Existing Building Proposed Building Addition NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and / or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. NORTH ArgN 40 ANDOVER 0 50 100 200 1"=1 0 0' Scale in Feet arth Solutions NWILc Geotechnical Engineering, Construction Monitoring and Environmental Sciences Test Pit Location Plan Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 2 111 NOTES: 18" Min. °0 ° O0 0 O 0� 0 0 CO 0 e e 8°.=',° OO 0 ° 00000 0 00 0 °0 0 0 0 0 ° • 0 0°0° 0 o0 ,o0 O 0 O 00 O O O C) 0 000 °(--2 00 00 6 0 oO 0 ^ 0 0 0 0 Q0 0 o 0 00 0 u0000- 00 0 0 0 G 00 0 00 0O 0 O 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 00 00°Q, oc 00 000 0 00 0 00 ° 0 0 00 °O 0 00 0 0 0 O 0 O ° 0 00 00p 00 0 O V 0 D 0 D O 0 0 0 0. 0 0 00 0 A 0 0 0° 0 0 0 00 0 00 tf 0 ° 0 0 O C 00 0 0 0 a C] O O : 0 /� bJ 0 00 0 00 o 00 00 0 O 0 00 0 0 oo 0 0 0 og 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0° A Ono O a o 9 0 0 00 00 0 00 y o o° 0 0 • so; • Free Draining Backfill should consist of soil having less than 5 percent fines. Percent passing #4 should be 25 to 75 percent. • Sheet Drain may be feasible in lieu of Free Draining Backfill, per ESNW recommendations. • Drain Pipe should consist of perforated, rigid PVC Pipe surrounded with 1" Drain Rock. °000 0 06 0 0 ° LEGEND: Free Draining Structural Backfill ti:;rti:ti:4 1 inch Drain Rock Structural Fill Perforated Drain Pipe (Surround In Drain Rock) SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Earth Solutions NWiic Earth Solutions NWc Geotechnical Engineering, Construction Monitoring • and Environmental Sciences RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 3 2" (Min.) Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround with 1" Rock) NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of 12" of Tess permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. lo.r.o.o.r ▪ ti•ti•ti•ti• O .010.6.10 r•r•r•r•r t•r•r•r•r LEGEND: Surface Seal; native soil or other low permeability material. 1" Drain Rock SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT OT SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Earth Solutions NWitc Earth Solutions NWLLc Geotechnical Engineering. Construction Monitoring and Environmental Sciences FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 4 APPENDIX A. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ES -1581.01 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating a total of five test pits across accessible portions of the property. The subsurface explorations were completed in April 2010. The approximate test pit locations are illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. Logs of the test pits are provided in this Appendix. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 13 feet below existing grades. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Earth Solutions NW u_c SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50'.i OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN No. 200 SIEVE SIZE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS MORE THAN �% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVELS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) sr .' s` ��' �/ �� �•,� • GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES .6• a 6G L 000 DC )0°90 GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL I- NE ND MIXTURES. LITTLE OR GRAVELS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE174.."i4 AMOUNT OF FINES) o. • s '0 O Lai o 3'� Q ! : GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND - SILT MIXTURES 1 • . e %�� • ; �,1��-�., 4i.:'/./ GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES SAND AND SANDY SOILSPOORLY-GRADED MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE• FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SANDSSW (LITTLE OR NO FINES) .... , SANDS. GRAVELLY SANDS.LITTLE O FINES SP SANDS. GRAVELLY SAND, LITRE OR NO FINES .. SANDS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) . ` '= '' . • • SM ' SILTY SANDS. SAND - SILT MIXTURES . SC CLAYEY SANDS. SAND - CLAY MIXTURES FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50%INORGANIC OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SILTS LIQUID LIMIT AND LESS THAN CLAYS ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR. SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS. SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS _'. OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY SILTS LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS AND GREATER THAN 50 MH SILTS. MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS ` / CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY tY ... """"�"' OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS La i .0 el ge . t! �� ��� �� 11 PT PEAT. HUMUS. SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP -1 : Ela rth 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. ISOluli°n Redmond, Washington 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 ",''' Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CLIENT Shasta Beverage PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition PROJECT NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila. Washington DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — eTESTSo 0 0 SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER vi z GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - - - - - - - - - - ` 10 MC = 11.40% Fines =12.20%'•••'•' MC = 14.50% MC = 11.60% MC =16.00%• MC = 21.00% MC = 39.10% SM •;.•s•. •**; ••••... ••••••• Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) 15 SM ••••••• •••• ••••••. •;•:•:. 44.+. .❖.•. :•:•:•: ••••••• ::::: ❖pt ••v.* Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist (Fill) -variable gravel content 7.0 -becomes dense, includes gray silty sand nodules Gray silty SAND with gravel, dense to very dense, moist (Fill - Old Commercial Pad) 8.0 SM SM • • Greenish - gray poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense to dense, moist 10.o ML Gray SILT, medium dense, moist -organic wet layer above -0.5" thick (old topsoil?) -wood fragments -sand layers 13 ,0 - ` - - 0 is i a - L m Aiz JJ Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 13.0 feet. Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP -2 t a rift 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. ''''411" 1 1 t )11' Redmond, Washington 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 1,1V 11, Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CUENT Shasta Beverage PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition PROJECT NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila. Washingt2n DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": field grass AFTER EXCAVATION = W + co 0 SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS 0 z GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -- - - - - _ 5 MC = 9.00% MC =10.60% MC = 8.10% MC=35.30% SM :••+• ;•;+; •••. ••••• .❖•fo . .1* +;++ .❖. •;•;• '+••• •X• •.••• ••Oa •.:;: •••• •• •�::. V. Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, moist (Fill) -becomes wet 7.0 -very light seepage SP-: SM SM - - - - 10 Grayish - brown silty SAND with gravel, dense, moist (Fill) 9:5 SP- SM „ • . :10.0 Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, moist ML 1Gray SILT, medium dense, wet 11 .0 - - s s 3 5 7 T i LI C L C O i g Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 7.0 feet during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 11.0 feet. Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP -3 I .1 fit, 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. '''41111 l 11 ) n . Redmond, Washington 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 X14' ii Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax 425-284-2855 CLIENT Shasta Beverage PROJECT NAME Shasta WarehouseAdditian PROJECT NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila. Washinntan _ DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating. GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field Grass AFTER EXCAVATION -- c DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS vi ai m GRAPHIC I LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - - - - .-- 5 MC = 16.20% MC = 22.30% MC =14.70% ' SM. ••• :•: -•-•. .:°;..- '••••)° :•:•::: ••::4 .°:O: • • •' •••••:•: ••••11.0, •• Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) -trace organic debris -becomes medium dense 4 .5 NIL .....: ••••: •:•:-:: •..•.•. . .•:•K ❖ .:.: .•:•:•: :...... •..!•! Gray SILT, medium dense, moist (Fill) -sandlayers 9,9 - - - - -• -Brown 10 SM silty SAND, medium dense, moist to wet 10.0Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 10.0 feet. GENERAL BH 1 TP I WELL 1581-01.GPJ GINT UB.GDT 5/19l1U Earl h �Sululiun; NW Earth Solutions NW 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CLIENT Shasta Beverage PROJECT NUMBER 1581.01 TEST PIT NUMBER TP -4 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila. Washington DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field grass GROUND ELEVATION GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — TEST PIT SIZE AT END OF EXCAVATION — AFTER EXCAVATION -- 5 1- 10 GENERAL BH 1 TP 1 WELL 1581-01.GPJ GINT US.GDT 5/19110 w a I -w W m iz N TESTS MC = 7.50% MC = 24.30% Fines = 65.00% MC = 19.00% MC=8.80% MC = 35.40% U = U' gO SM MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) -trace wood debris 4.0 -becomes medium dense ML SM • 11.0 ML Gray sandy SILT, medium dense to dense, moist (Fill) -silty sand layers / interbeds Gray silty SAND with gravel, dense, moist 11_5 Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, wet Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 11.5 feet. —" CLIENT PROJECT Earth Solutions NW Farm h 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. 'S4) l u t i �� n Redmond, Washington 98052 `IV, 1. Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax 425-284-2855 Shasta Beverage TEST PIT NUMBER TP -5 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Shasta Ware g ise.Adstition NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila. Washington DATE EXCAVATION EXCAVATION LOGGED NOTES STARTED CONTRACTOR METHOD BY SSR 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -- CHECKED BY grass SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field AFTER EXCAVATION —• G 0 SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS v� u�i m GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SM : • • ••• •: :•' .;.;.:: 1.0 Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) - - - - - - - MC = 11.50% MC =18.10% SP- SM :•:•:•: +M'• ❖.❖. ..-....x...: •.:.:•:' *:!;!;t: :,:•:•; .O❖: •• * .0.•4'. 7.0 •- '•'•'•' ❖ :•:! ..... .•.•: •.❖.; e.s Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, moist (Fill) •heavy caving in seepage - - - - 0 5 0 0 vi 3 z z a 4 W IL i g I Gray silty SAND with gravel, dense, moist (Fill) -hole abandoned due to heavy caving & seepage Test pit terminated at 8.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater se4epage encountered at 7.0 feet during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 8.5 feet. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ES -1581.01 Earth Solutions NW. LLC Earth Solutions NW CLIENT Shasta Beverages, Inc. PROJECT NUMBER ES -1581.01 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NAME Shasta Beverage Warehouse Addition PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila - RCEN FINER BY " I 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 1 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 8 4 3 2 1.6 1 ' 112318 3 4 8 810 1416 20 30 40 50 80 100 140 200 HYDROMETER wee 1l Auk 100 10 1 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS J 0.01 0.001 COBBLES GRAVEL coarse r floe coarse SAND medium fine SILT OR CLAY Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu • TP -1 4.Oft. Brom silty SAND, SM 2.47 9.60 TP -4 4.5ft. Specimen Identification Gray sandy SILT, ML D100 D60 D30 010 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay • TP -1 4.0ft. TP -4 4.5ft. 19 19 0.416 0.211 6.1 3.5 81.7 31.5 12.2 65.0 1 COPY 1 COPY 1 COPY REPORT DISTRIBUTION ES -1581.01 Shasta Beverages, Inc. 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Mr. Nick Heaton Craft Architects Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Dean Watkins Shutler Engineering 12503 Bel -Red Road Bellevue, Washington 98005 Attention: Mr. Joe Shulter Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 — 72' Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Mr. Dan Balmelli Earth Solutions NW, LLC 7.0 OTHER PERMITS 7.0 OTHER PERMITS Other permits for this project site include: • Right-of-Way Use Permit • Site Development Permit • Clear and Grade Permit • Building Permit • NPDES Permit 14770.002.doc 8.0 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 8.0 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN This section is left blank however, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be provided for the NPDES Permit required for this development since it is over an acre in size. Please refer to that document, which will be provided prior to the start of construction for your review. A. Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Plan Analysis and Design A sediment trap was sized based on Appendix D of the 2009 KCSWDM and the calculations are on the following pages of this report. 14770.002.doc KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea -Tac Computing Series : 14770esc.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating 15 -minute Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG15R.rnf . Flow Path: Length 220.00 ft @ Slope 0.005000 Till Grass 0.64 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI15R.srf . Flow Path: Length 150.00 ft @ Slope 0.002000 Impervious 0.64 acres Total Area : 1.28 acres Peak Discharge: 1.07 CFS at 6:30 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:14770esc.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command Enter the Analysis TOOLS. Module Analysis Tools Command Compute PEAKS and Flow Frequencies Loading Stage/Discharge curve:14770esc.tsf Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770esc.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac Frequencies & Peaks saved to File:14770esc.pks Analysis Tools Command RETURN to Previous Menu KCRTS Command eXit KCRTS Program Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:14770esc.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 0.310 0.262 0.700 0.298 0.463 0.343 0.474 1.07 Computed Peaks Peak Flow Rates --- Rank Time of Peak 6 10/08/00 8 1/05/02 2 12/08/02 7 8/26/04 4 11/17/04 5 10/27/05 3 10/25/06 1 1/09/08 4:15 15:00 17:15 1:00 5:00 11:00 22:45 6:30 Flow Frequency Analysis Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1.07 1 100.00 0.700 2 25.00 0.474 3 10.00 0.463 4 5.00 0.343 5 3.00 0.310 6 2.00 0.298 7 1.30 0.262 8 1.10 0.948 50.00 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 0.231 0.091 0.980 SIZE THE SEDIMENT TRAP Q2 = 0.31 cfs by KCRTS adjusted for 15 minutes Surface Area Required = 2,080(02) Surface Area Provided = 1,650 SF = 2,080(0.31) = 645 SF 14770.002.doc 9.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 9.0 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL The Operations and Maintenance Manual is provided in this section. 14770.002.doc APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 3 - DETENTION TANKS AND VAULTS Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Site Trash and debris Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet (this is about equal to the amount of trash it would take to fill up one standard size office garbage can). In general, there should be no visual evidence of dumping. Trash and debris deared from site. Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may constitute a hazard to County personnel or the public. Noxious and nuisance vegetation removed according to applicable regulations. No danger of noxious vegetation where County personnel or the public might normally be. Contaminants and pollution Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. Materials removed and disposed of according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Grass/groundcover Grass or groundcover exceeds 18 inches in height. Grass or groundcover mowed to a height no greater than 6 inches. Tank or Vault Storage Area Trash and debris Any trash and debris accumulated in vault or tank (includes floatables and non-floatables). No trash or debris in vault. Sediment accumulation Accumulated sediment depth exceeds 10% of the diameter of the storage area for '/2 length of storage vault or any point depth exceeds 15% of diameter. Example: 72 -inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 inches for more than Y2 length of tank. All sediment removed from storage area. Tank Structure Plugged air vent Any blockage of the vent. Tank or vault freely vents. Tank bent out of shape Any part of tank/pipe is bent out of shape more than 10% of its design shape. Tank repaired or replaced to design. Gaps between sections, damaged joints or cracks or tears in wall A gap wider than 1/2 -inch at the joint of any tank sections or any evidence of soil particles entering the tank at a joint or through a wall. No water or soil entering tank through joints or walls. Vault Structure Damage to wall, frame, bottom, and/or top slab Cracks wider than %a -inch, any evidence of soil entering the structure through cracks or qualified inspection personnel determines that the vault is not structurally sound. Vault is sealed and structurally sound. Inlet/Outlet Pipes Sediment accumulatlon Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Inlet/outlet pipes clear of sediment Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outlet pipes (includes floatables and non-fioatables). No trash or debris in pipes. Damaged Cracks wider than 1/2 -inch at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering at the joints of the Inlet/outlet pipes. No cracks more than 'h -inch wide at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A A-5 1/9/2009 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 3 - DETENTION TANKS AND VAULTS Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Condltlons When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Access Manhole Cover/lid not in place CoverAid is missing or only partially In place. Any open manhole requires Immediate maintenance. Manhole access covered. Locking mechanism not working Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts cannot be seated. Self-locking coverAid does not work. Mechanism opens with proper tools. CoverAid difficult to remove One maintenance person cannot remove coverAid after applying 80 lbs of lift. Cover/lid can be removed and reinstalled by one maintenance person. Ladder rungs unsafe Missing rungs, misalignment, rust, or cracks. Ladder meets design standards. Allows maintenance person safe access. Large access doors/plate Damaged or difficult to open Large access doors or plates cannot be opened/removed using normal equipment. Replace or repair access door so it can opened as designed. Gaps, doesn't cover completely Large access doors not flat and/or access opening not completely covered. Doors close flat and covers access opening completely. Lifting Rings missing, rusted Lifting rings not capable of lifting weight of door or plate. Lifting rings sufficient to lift or remove door or plate. 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A A-6 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 4 - CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Structure Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than /: cubic foot which is located immediately in front of the structure opening or is blocking capacity of the structure by more than 10%. No Trash or debris blocking or potentially bioddng entrance to structure. Trash or debris in the structure that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. No trash or debris in the structure. Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume. No condition present which would attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Sediment Sediment exceeds 60% of the depth from the bottom of the structure to the Invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the structure or the bottom of the FROP-T section or is within 6 inches of the invert of the lowest pipe Into or out of the structure or the bottom of the FROP-T section. Sump of structure contains no sediment Damage to frame and/or top slab Comer of frame extends more than % Inch past curb face Into the street (If applicable). Frame is even with curb. Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than'/ inch. Top slab is free of holes and cracks. Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation of more than % inch of the frame from the top slab. Frame is sitting flush on top slab. Cracks in walls or bottom Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 3 feet, any evidence of soil particles entering structure through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Structure is sealed and structurally sound. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering structure through cracks. No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the joint of inlet/outlet pipe. Settlement/ misalignment Structure has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. Damaged pipe joints Cracks wider than /cinch at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the structure at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes. No cracks more than /.-inch wide at the joint of inlet/outlet pipes. Contaminants and pollution Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. Materials removed and disposed of according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Ladder rungs missing or unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp edges. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance person safe access. FROP-T Section Damage T section is not securely attached to structure wall and outlet pipe structure should support at least 1,000 lbs of up or down pressure. T section securely attached to wall and outlet pipe. Structure is not in upright position (allow up to 10% from plumb). Structure in correct position. Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight or show signs of deteriorated grout. Connections to outlet pipe are water tight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes—other than designed holes --in the structure. Structure has no holes other than designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or missing Cleanout gate is missing. Replace cleanout gate. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual – Appendix A A-7 1/9/2009 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 4 - CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Cleanout gate is not watertight. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one maintenance person. Gate moves up and down easily and Is watertight. Chain/rod leading to gate is missing or damaged. Chain is In place and works as designed. Orifice Plate Damaged or missing Control device is not working properly due to missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. Plate Is in place and works as designed. Obstructions Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation blocking the plate. Plate is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Overflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. Pipe is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Deformed or damaged lip Up of overflow pipe is bent or deformed. Overflow pipe does not allow overflow at an elevation lower than design Inlet/Outlet Pipe Sediment accumulation Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Inlet/outlet pipes clear of sediment. Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outlet pipes (includes floatables and non-floatables). No trash or debris in pipes. Damaged Cracks wider than '/cinch at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. No cracks more than ''A -inch wide at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. Metal Grates (If Applicable) Unsafe grate opening Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate opening meets design standards. Trash and debris Trash and debris that is bloddng more than 20% of grate surface. Grate free of trash and debris. footnote to guidelines for disposal Damaged or missing Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate is in place and meets design standards. Manhole Cover/Ud Cover/lid not in place Cover/lid is missing or only partially in place. Any open structure requires urgent maintenance. Cover/lid protects opening to structure. Locking mechanism Not Working Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts cannot be seated. Self-locking cover/lid does not work. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover/lid difficult to Remove One maintenance person cannot remove cover/lid after applying 80 lbs. of lift. Cover/lid can be removed and reinstalled by one maintenance person. 1/9/2009 A-8 2009 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance Is Performed Structure Sediment Sediment exceeds 60% of the depth from the bottom of the catch basin to the invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the catch basin or is within 6 inches of the invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the catch basin. Sump of catch basin contains no sediment. Trash and debris Trash or debris of more than % cubic foot which is located immediately in front of the catch basin opening or is bloddng capadty of the catch basin by more than 10%. No Trash or debris bloddng or potentially bloddng entrance to catch basin. Trash or debris in the catch basin that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. No trash or debris in the catch basin. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate odors that could cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). No dead animals or vegetation present within catch basin. Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot In volume. No condition present which would attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Damage to frame , and/or top slab Comer of frame extends more than % inch past curb face into the street (If applicable). Frame is even with curb. Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than % inch. Top slab is free of holes and cracks. Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation of more than % inch of the frame from the top slab. Frame Is sitting flush on top slab. Cracks in walls or bottom Cracks wider than % inch and longer than 3 feet, any evidence of soli particles entering catch basin through cracks, or maintenance person judges that catch basin is unsound. Catch basin is sealed and structurally sound. Cracks wider than % inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the joint of inlet/outlet pipe. Settlement/ misalignment Catch basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated more than 2 Inches out of alignment. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. Damaged pipe joints Cracks wider than '% -inch at the joint of the Inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering the catch basin at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes. No cracks more than %-inch wide at the joint of inlet/outlet pipes. Contaminants and pollution Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. Materials removed and disposed of according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Intet/Outlet Pipe Sediment accumulation Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Inlet/outlet pipes dear of sediment. Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outlet pipes (includes floatables and non-floatables). No trash or debris In pipes. Damaged Cracks wider than' 'A -inch at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering at the joints of the intet/outlet pipes. No cracks more than'/ -inch wide at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A A-9 1/9/2009 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 6 - CONVEYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Pipes Sediment & debris accumulation Accumulated sediment or debris that exceeds 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Water flows freely through pipes. Vegetation/roots VegetatioNroots that reduce free movement of water through pipes. Water flows freely through pipes. Contaminants and pollution Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. Materials removed and disposed of according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Damage to protective coating or corrosion Protective coating is damaged; rust or corrosion is weakening the structural Integrity of any part of pipe. Pipe repaired or replaced. Damaged Any dent that decreases the cross section area of pipe by more than 20% or is determined to have weakened structural integrity of the pipe. Pipe repaired or replaced. Ditches Trash and debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Trash and debris deared from ditches. Sediment accumulation Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the design depth. Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment and debris so that it matches design. Noxious weeds Any noxious or nuisance vegetation which may constitute a hazard to County personnel or the public. Noxious and nuisance vegetation removed according to applicable regulations. No danger of noxious vegetation where County personnel or the public might normally be. Contaminants and pollution Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. Materials removed and disposed of according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through ditches. Water flows freely through ditches. Erosion damage to slopes Any erosion observed on a ditch slope. Slopes are not eroding. Rock lining out of place or missing (If Applicable) One layer or less of rock exists above native soil area 5 square feet or more, any exposed native soil. Replace rocks to design standards. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A 1/9/2009 A-11 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOW CONTROL, CONVEYANCE, AND WQ FACILITIES NO. 17 - WETVAULT Maintenance Component Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Site Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated on facility site. Trash and debris removed from facility site. Treatment Area Trash and debris Any trash and debris accumulated In vault (includes floatables and non-floatables). No trash or debris in vault. Sediment accumulation Sediment accumulation in vault bottom exceeds the depth of the sediment zone plus 6 inches. No sediment in vault. Contaminants and pollution Any evidence of contaminants or pollution such as oil, gasoline, concrete slurries or paint. Materials removed and disposed of according to applicable regulations. Source control BMPs implemented if appropriate. No contaminants present other than a surface oil film. Vault Structure Damage to wall, frame, bottom, and/or top slab Cracks wider than'/ranch, any evidence of soil entering the structure through cracks, vault does not retain water or qualified inspection personnel determines that the vault is not structurally sound. Vault is sealed and structurally sound. Baffles damaged Baffles corroding, craddng, warping and/or showing signs of failure or baffle cannot be removed. Repair or replace baffles or walls to specifications. Ventilation Ventilation area blocked or plugged. No reduction of ventilation area exists. Inlet/Outlet Pipe Sediment accumulation Sediment filling 20% or more of the pipe. Inlet/outlet pipes dear of sediment. Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated in inlet/outlet pipes (includes floatables and non-floatables). No trash or debris in pipes. Damaged Cracks wider than '/cinch at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipes or any evidence of soil entering at the joints of the inlet/outlet pipes. No cracks more than 'A -inch wide at the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. Gravity Drain Inoperable valve Valve will not open and close. Valve opens and closes normally. Valve won't seal Valve does not seal completely. Valve completely seals closed. Access Manhole Access cover/lid damaged or difficult to open Access cover/id cannot be easily opened by one person. Corrosion/deformation of cover/lid. Access cover/lid can be opened by one person. Locking mechanism not working Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance person with proper tools. Bolts cannot be seated. Self-locking cover/lid does not work. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover/lid difficult to remove One maintenance person cannot remove cover/lid after applying 80 lbs of lift. Cover/lid can be removed and reinstalled by one maintenance person. Access doors/plate has gaps, doesn't cover completely Large access doors not flat and/or access opening not completely covered. Doors close flat and covers access opening completely. Ufting Rings missing, rusted Lifting rings not capable of lifting weight of door or plate. Lifting rings suffldent to lift or remove door or plate. Ladder rungs unsafe Missing rungs, misalignment, rust, or cracks. Ladder meets design standards. Allows maintenance person safe access. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix A A-23 1/9/2009 PREPARED FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. May 19, 2010 Scott gel, Senior Project Geologist Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Principal GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SHASTA BEVERAGES WAREHOUSE ADDITION 1227 ANDOVER PARK EAST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ES -1581.01 Earth Solutions NW, LLC RECEIVED 1805 -136TH Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 MAY 2 4 2010 Phone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 GOMNIUKI (y Toll Free: 866-336-8710 DEVELOPMENT h The following information is provided to help you manage your risks. Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi- neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one — not even you — should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific fac- tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth- erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes—even minor ones—and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineer- ing reportwhose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi- neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ—sometimes significantly— from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engi- neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geo- technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti- nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con- tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contrac- tors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disci- plines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsi- bilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenviron- mental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoen- vironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk man- agement guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a com- prehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a num- ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed in -this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services per- formed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold preven- tion. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this report will not of itself be sufficient to prevent mold from growing in or on the structure involved. Rely, on Your ASFE-Member Geotechncial Engineer for Additional Assistance Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with you ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information. ASFE The Best People •n Earth 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017 e-mail: info©asfe.org www.asfe.org Copyright 2004 by ASFE, Inc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with ASFE's specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of ASFE, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review only members of ASFE may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geotechnical engineering report. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being an ASFE member could be committing negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation. IIGER06045.OM May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Shasta Beverages, Inc. 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Mr. Nick Heaton Dear Mr. Heaton: Earth Solutions NWac Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Shasta Beverages Warehouse Addition, 1227 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington". Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the test pit locations, the site is underlain primarily by about eight to ten feet of medium dense silty sand, sand and silt fill. Perched groundwater was observed at a depth of about seven feet below existing grade at test pit locations TP -2 and TP -5 during the fieldwork (April 2010). It appears that the groundwater is perched above a dense fill layer consisting of silty sand with gravel, which may represent a former parking area. Based on the results of our study, the proposed warehouse addition can be supported on conventional foundation systems bearing on structural fill. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill will be necessary. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES -1581.01 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 2 Geologic Setting 3 Groundwater 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Temporary Erosion Control 4 Site Stripping Recommendations 4 In-situ Soils 4 Structural Fill 4 Foundations 5 Seismic Design Considerations 5 Slab -On -Grade Floors 6 Retaining Walls 6 Drainage 7 Excavations and Slopes 7 Utility Trench Backfill 7 Pavement Sections 8 LIMITATIONS 8 Additional Services 8 GRAPHICS PLATE 1 PLATE 2 PLATE 3 PLATE 4 VICINITY MAP TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DEATAIL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL APPENDICES Appendix A Subsurface Exploration Test Pit Logs Appendix B Laboratory Test Results Earth Solutions NW, LLC GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SHASTA BEVERAGES WAREHOUSE ADDITION 1227 ANDOVER PARK EAST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ES -1581.01 INTRODUCTION General This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the warehouse addition to be constructed along the north side of the existing bottling/warehouse facility located at 1227 Andover Park East in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this study was to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. Our scope of services for completing this geotechnical engineering study addressed the following: • Conducting subsurface explorations within accessible portions of the development envelope; • Conduct engineering analyses, and • Preparation of this report The following documents/maps were reviewed as part of our report preparation: • Architectural and Site Egress Plan, Sheet A1.1, prepared by Craft Architects, dated May 7, 2010; • Geologic Map of King County, Booth et al, 2006, and; • King County USDA Soil Conservation Survey (SCS). Proiect Description A 40,000 square foot warehouse addition and associated improvements will be constructed along the north side of an existing bottling/warehouse structure. ESNW understands the existing building was constructed in the late 1960's and that the area of the currently proposed addition was filled at the same time to approximately match the finish floor elevation of the existing building. The new addition finish floor will match the existing structure. Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 2 At the time this report was prepared, specific building load values were not available. However, based on our experience with similar developments we anticipate wall loads will range from about 4 to 6 kips per foot and column loads are anticipated to range from about 80 to 120 kips. Slab -on -grade loading will likely be on the order of 250 pounds per square foot (psf). ESNW understands along the south side of the new addition, columns will be constructed a distance of three feet from the existing north wall. The new roof will cantilever to meet the existing roof system to provide weather -proofing. Based on the existing topography, grading will be relatively minimal across the majority of the site, and will likely be limited to cutting to design footing elevations. The remainder of the site will be developed with asphalt paved drive lanes. If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to confirm that our geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is located on the west side of Andover Park East in Tukwila, Washington. The approximate location of the property is illustrated on Plate 1 (Vicinity Map) included in this study. A commercial bottling/warehouse structure occupies the southern portion of the site. The site is bordered to the north and south by commercial development, to the east by Andover Park East and to the west by a railroad spur. The existing site topography is relatively level and consists of a fill pad which extends roughly to the property boundaries to the north and west, to a parking lot to the east and abuts the bottling/warehouse structure to the south. Subsurface An ESNW representative observed, logged and sampled five test pits excavated by an excavator and operator contracted to ESNW. The approximate locations of the test pits are depicted on the Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2). Please refer to the test pit logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Fill was observed at all test locations and extended to depths ranging from about to 8 to 11 feet below existing grade. The fill generally consisted of silty sand (Unified Soil Classification SM), poorly graded sand with silt (SP -SM) and silt (ML). A distinct layer of dense silty sand with gravel was observed at test pit locations TP -1, TP -2 and TP -5 from about seven to eight and one-half feet below existing ground elevations. Below this layer, medium dense sandy silt (ML), silty sand (SM) and poorly graded sand with silt (SP -SM) native soils were encountered extending to the maximum exploration depth of 13 feet below existing grades. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 3 Geologic Setting The referenced geologic map resource identifies alluvial (Qal) deposits throughout the site and surrounding areas. The King County Soil Survey (SCS) identifies Urban Land (Ur) soils across the site. Urban Land soils are those used for large-scale or regional grading areas such as the commercial district of Tukwila. The soils are variable with respect to gradation due to the variation of source material used. This soil unit presents a slight to moderate erosion hazard and exhibits slow runoff. The soil conditions below the current pad fill zone encountered at the test pit locations are generally consistent with the published geologic and soil designations. Groundwater Groundwater was observed at the test pit locations TP -2 and TP -5 at a depth of seven feet relative to existing grades during the fieldwork (April 2010). The groundwater appeared to be perched along the dense fill layer encountered at about seven feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates are higher during the wetter, winter months. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of the geotechnical engineering study, construction of the proposed warehouse addition at the subject site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The recommendations provided in this report are based in part on the conditions encountered at the test pit locations, engineering and analyses, our understanding of the proposed project and our experience with similar projects. This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Shasta Beverages, Inc., and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 4 Site Preparation and Earthwork Prior to construction we anticipate site preparation will include implementation of temporary erosion control, stripping topsoil and otherwise organic materials and removal of structural improvements within the current outdoor storage area. Temporary Erosion Control Temporary construction entrances and drive lanes, consisting of at least 12 inches of quarry spalls can be considered in order to minimize off-site soil tracking and to provide a stable access entrance surface, as necessary. Erosion control measures should consist of silt fencing placed along the down gradient side of the site. Soil stockpiles should be protected to reduce soil erosion. Site Stripping Recommendations Topsoil and organic -rich soil was encountered generally within the upper three to four inches at the test pit locations. ESNW should observe stripping operations to confirm adequate removal of organic soil. In-situ Soils The soils at the majority of the test pit locations which would likely be exposed during grading activities consist of silty sand and sand and have a moderate to high sensitivity to moisture and were generally in a moist condition at the time of the explorations (April 2010). Soils encountered during site excavations that are over the acceptable optimum moisture content will require moisture conditioning prior to placement and compaction. Conversely, soils that are substantially below the optimum moisture content may require moisture conditioning through the addition of water prior to use as structural fill. From a geotechnical standpoint, the soils encountered at the test pit locations are generally suitable for use as structural fill provided the soil moisture content is at or up to 3 to 4 percent above the optimum moisture content. The use on-site soils as structural fill during the wet season will be difficult. A contingency should be included in the project budget for the use of imported soil should the on-site soil be too wet for use as structural fill. Structural Fill Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab -on -grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be placed in loose lifts of 12 inches or less and be compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D-1557). Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 5 Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction. Foundations Based on the results of our study, the warehouse addition can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on existing structural fill. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill, may be necessary. Provided foundations will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be used for design of new foundations: • Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf • Passive earth pressure 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) • Coefficient of friction 0.4 A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. The above passive pressure and friction values include a factor -of - safety of 1.5. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch and differential settlement of about one-half inch is anticipated. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead Toads are applied. The new loads associated with the addition will result in some settlement of the existing structure. Given the competent condition and thickness of the fill underlying the site, settlement of the existing structure is estimated to be in the range of one quarter to one half inch. Seismic Design Considerations The 2006 International Building Code specifies several soil profiles that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the soil conditions observed at the test sites, Site Class E, from table 1613.5.2, should be used for design. In our opinion, the alluvial soils underlying the fill on the site are susceptible to liquefaction. In our opinion, the fill soil is not susceptible to liquefaction given its relative density and the lack of an established groundwater table. In our opinion, settlements resulting from liquefaction of the underlying alluvial soil are anticipated to be in the range of one to two inches. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 6 Slab -On -Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors for the proposed warehouse should be supported on a firm and unyielding subgrade consisting of competent native soil or structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material should have a fines content of 5 percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. If a vapor barrier is to be utilized it should be a material specifically designed for use as a vapor barrier and should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Retaining Walls Retaining walls must be designed to resist earth The following parameters can be used for retaining • Active earth pressure (yielding wall) • At -rest earth pressure (restrained wall) • Traffic surcharge for passenger vehicles (where applicable) • Passive resistance • Coefficient of friction • Seismic surcharge pressures and applicable surcharge loads. wall design: 35 pcf (equivalent fluid) 50 pcf 70 psf (rectangular distribution) 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) 0.4 6H (where H equals retained height) Additional surcharge loading from adjacent foundations, sloped backfill, or other Toads should be included in the retaining wall design. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design. Retaining walls should be backfilled with free draining material that extends along the height of the wall, and a distance of at least 18 inches behind the wall. The site sand and gravel soils can be considered free draining provided no topsoil is used or mixed with the backfill materials. The upper one foot of the wall backfill can consist of a Tess permeable soil, if desired. A perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall, and connected to an approved discharge location. A typical retaining wall drainage detail is provided on Plate 3. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 Drainage ES -1581.01 Page 7 Groundwater was observed at the test pit locations TP- 2 and TP -5 at a depth of about seven feet during the fieldwork (April 2010). As such, perched groundwater should be anticipated in deeper site excavations particularly during the winter and spring months. Temporary measures to control surface water runoff during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and sumps, as necessary. Based on the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test pit locations, extensive dewatering of excavations will likely not be necessary. In our opinion, footing drains should be installed around the addition perimeter. A typical foundation drain detail is provided as Plate 4. Excavations and Slopes The Federal Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) provide soil classification in terms of temporary slope inclinations. Based on the soil conditions encountered at the test pit locations, the fill is classified as Type C by OSHA/WISHA. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils must be sloped no steeper than 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). Temporary shoring may be necessary to support excavations if the recommended temporary slope inclination cannot be achieved. Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2H:1V, or flatter, and should be planted with vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. The geotechnical engineer should observe temporary and permanent slopes to confirm the slope inclinations, and to provide additional excavation and slope recommendations, as necessary. Utility Trench Backfill In our opinion, the soils anticipated to be exposed in utility excavations will be generally suitable for support of utilities. Organic or highly compressible soils encountered in the trench excavations should not be used for supporting utilities. Please refer to the 'Site Preparation and Earthwork' section of this report for recommendations regarding the use of on-site soil as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable City of Tukwila specifications. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Shasta Beverages, Inc. May 19, 2010 ES -1581.01 Page 8 Pavement Sections The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in pavement areas should be compacted as recommended in the "Site Preparation and Earthwork" section of this report. It is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade areas may still exist after base grading activities. Areas of unsuitable or yielding subgrade conditions will require remedial measures such as overexcavation, placement of a geotextile and thicker crushed rock or structural fill sections prior to pavement. For relatively high volume, heavily loaded pavements subjected to moderate to high, loaded truck traffic, the following preliminary pavement sections can be considered: • Three inches of asphalt concrete (AC) placed over six inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or; • Three inches of AC placed over four inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). The AC, ATB and CRB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. Soil base material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density. LIMITATIONS The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test locations may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions NW, LLC v,¢ S 1 9th ^ Ia N t a 111th5t.1 S c 6 G,➢ ,...1` � e9 I \ \ • r 5 13 > S� S 139th St 5 9olden 4) ...; St $ St Q 5139th _ '1139 S 1 S' 740tH:`: 513 NO ,: St St JOSEI S no .; 'Sar r' :-64.4.1'7.5:::,.,"4.6, 5® 141st St v t ..• �,., a' ' A 1 52nd W'S 2 S 138th St FOSTE PARRAL14 142nd ,n 5t s 4 > Sr • �t andyCentral ver. ' '9",;,,,Easm s1 altar' P- .5. a s� \ ' f,�+ "' Q LAI 5.442nd St Foster HS lq • ,- Q ` St • v ,n - t >•'a Q t © , e Q> n Q v, , .., Casino S 142 d St Q a ,•, 90 v Wy S "_ o I" � � � 143rdst _---- RD S 143rd PI t RIVER 'BLACK R FOREST ' Embry Riddle .. Aeronautkal . Sy, University , R[ FC 3 5 146th ...5145 144TH{ `1 8300; 4aoo I ST ' S ` S1 Q H ELNUT *,41. �, °' '' Center: •4,1 ATERWORKS . A c Q ..-- 5 . > PAR S 1 7th St FSG, , S 147th55� 1 ' S� FORT N O 'GARDENSS n4:s, .p - 2 v, S 148thp o , St..e > `..' • , n a i i _.g . ,N aq�'. 9 c } _ • , DENT PARK r ' D (.!` r o z ,n 3 $ 149th St $ 49th 5 /491 7 e`e ( ! vii4= 5151st - St a a '~ ,n S 1548 49tH,1f1 150thtS15t $_�51st 1 Zi.. 5-- } t t > `� Q `, Z� _ • P 5451st � ' f[ s 15[1111' $23 : $ ectieo� St S 1 s $t I I. - t,n,n I iy S = \ •Wit- ._. .f N 2A w l 24 t / <,:\ � ✓ ,----1, ✓ \ } o /Q UNS�CE St , c S J• ^, . . l o.7 ,''..i" ..--"111111-------.w F9 q ' t5 152nd Q ¢�"6 + -'=---'1313,,,,, i9'v . BLD `: PI . o : 4,9 ' 4, , 5 154th 9 n 16th St SN Nolo x.22 t ' � �_�� 153rd St St enter v�\ St > > r.Q/� o. ... 53rd \ �\ w . s5 \ 6 . Q gIrtTM-, TUKWILA'.% li ' S 156th Q,.," . ..... 158th Q 5 St St> CRYSTAL SPRINGS'' A 154A,\�T �' f• � !�� r 1 ... �34 . aopPARK \®,��-- , ®_` g ,,, ' , 11.—W<-.. PARK F�' 1/4 ,iKAWA I. ® 6'.t A St . 405 ' 1 g i b $ PARK ,.,,/lq t3 )159th 5 H � • 9S}-_ _ `^ j, c' 'c. S < 160th n e ;,,1.2 PARK SI 1 16Il y - >Q• d s > $4800 Q < t $ " S 12n-CS11162nd E.,. a • '':: a9o0.,jso "$ 1618 St 5163rd a' '.' v 5^ Q Oip, ' 15• St s. St / st PI /ade., , j 1 . I : , • H TUKWILA Westfield " Sottthcenter -:PKWY n 3 Evans 8 ack Dr' Baker Blvd Y W pe a a onga; i=i Jv .Q lt - ` I ' "'8I r ci J 't I i Iln = I } I I I J} BOEING LONGACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK BI L, I P' 5 --164th .". St ` QJ Q QN a' = N Q 1 8100 .t30, � < e• _ ,n .. > 7IrI�'fI ;. 4 ..,:c ® I BIC ./ . strand Bivd PA • - i, .. } . ' N S 1 166th W . g^�ca 1 W '' STRANDER . B‘• ` ' • i St Military Rd 1 ,;, S 167th 51 •,• S St .; t Z1' TUKWILA fi c S 168th -ft, St St - N ' = 'o POND ¢ Treck'Dr W �e. ' } I i 25 4 5 S 6:v , S I 170th tO St 1.: , St > > Q w, KWILA . 2(. POND PARKi: Fs �� C>� i I = TM N 5S 71st St-0u����o S c 172nd St nl ^ Corpora Ulf if 1 N c = it -' f _ 0 3 I a., $ Dr Minkler Blvd 6. 3 • _ 0 5 y IP. S 172nd PI 5^ S 173rd St ��� 5 175th S 173rd Ln ;' g 3 W _141land Dr 1 c 1 2 inkier Blvd 2 . c 1 I I 0� BOW 5176TH ? D a Midland g r S AR ST ,, s I > >> ^� 1 1 S 2 50th 79th St Dr c Av S w0 yl� i „th Q Q ,r, ,. Costco Dr . 1 - . u v,, ? s,r, Cts,:, D �u �, 5 35 i Triland` Dr SIT 36 [ � II' _ c _ A\©l\ 1 iii I, NORTH EarthEarth Solutions NWi i_c Reference: King County Solutions) cif; NW ut HI eotechnical Engineering, Construction Monitoring and Environmental Sciences Map 655 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 2009 Vicinity Map Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be for the information Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 responsible any subsequent misinterpretation of resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 1 TP -2 / / Proposed Warehouse Addition TP -5 I TP -3 TP -4 1_x_!1 z Existing Warehouse T r� -./ - I \�` -i LEGEND TP -1— I —Approximate Location of I ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No. ES -1581.01, May 2010 Subject Property Existing Building Proposed Building Addition NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and / or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. NORTH ANDOVER PARK WAY 0 50 100 200 1"=100' Scale in Feet Earth Solutions NW i_r_c arch Solutions NW u.Lc eotectnical Engineering, Construction Monitoring and Environmental Sciences Test Pit Location Plan Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 2 NOTES: 0•• °a •era r�. eC • 0, .0 t6i b®,1 • E' 90 0• (• •C O•on O 0 « �F •'; S.0•qy A 18" Min. O 0 o 0 0 0 o u0 0 00 0 o 0 :;-„„ 0 . O 0 0 O0 0..00v. 0 0 0 0 O0o0 0 0.0,00.- 0. O 0 0 p o0 0 0 `11,`"°00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 O 0 0 p.0 00 % OV 0 00 0 0 g °0000''' o 00 0 0 0 00 0.0 00 0 C 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (2°.,7":300:0° 0 000 00 0 000 000 0 00 0 00 O 00 p0 0O 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0L1:0 0 V o p o 0 0 0 0 0 ll{ 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 �t 0 Q V O 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 (0 0 0 0 2s 00 0 0 00 0 oo 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 B 0_0 0 B 0 0 0000 0 00 O 0 0 0 0 j:' 0 • .:^ O• • •. 0 RY� O • Free Draining Backfill should consist of soil having less than 5 percent fines. Percent passing #4 should be 25 to 75 percent. • Sheet Drain may be feasible in lieu of Free Draining Backfill, per ESNW recommendations. • Drain Pipe should consist of perforated, rigid PVC Pipe surrounded with 1" Drain Rock. 0 000 0 p o0 00 0 rer tirwe. f.r.r.r.� ter: f::12: LEGEND: Free Draining Structural Backfill 1 inch Drain Rock Structural Fill Perforated Drain Pipe (Surround In Drain Rock) SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOTA CONSTRUCTION DRAWING • Earth Solutions NW i_i_c Earth Solutions NWLLc Geoteehnieal Engineering, Construction Monitoring and, Environmental Sciences RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 3 Slope 2" (Min.) Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround with 1" Rock) NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of 12" of less permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. Lrtirlr.e.r Lr'.r5rtirtir .f.f.f•f.f LEGEND: Surface Seal; native soil or other low permeability material. 1" Drain Rock SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT OT SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Geo iecI t al Engineering, Construction Monitoring and'Environmental Sciences FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Shasta Warehouse Addition Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 05/19/2010 Proj. No. 1581.01 Checked SSR Date May 2010 Plate 4 D D. m 0 X APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ES -1581.01 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating a total of five test pits across accessible portions of the property. The subsurface explorations were completed in April 2010. The approximate test pit locations are illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. Logs of the test pits are provided in this Appendix. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 13 feet below existing grades. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Earth Solutions NW LLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50oi6 OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVELS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) � w:• to Olio ,1 A s 's . GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES 3d oe ° b.a° )o DDo ,0 0 00 b� DC 0 GP POORLY GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) .• ° )o I )0 ' of °° �- III 01 �° D� Q 1 GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURES ���'�j'I ~,�•...,, > �i� 0, • , *�CLAYEY GC GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES SAND AND SANDY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) ..*::::•:•:::•::. . SW WELL -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS WITHSILTY FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) c.r;•; "'''' :::;;:: ` SM SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES : •' ' ' SCCLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50 CLAYS ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY j / CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS GREATER THAN 50 MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS `+H INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY _ OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS .n ai..o as 40, El El !.! PT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached Togs. Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP -1 Earth 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. 'So I Utio 11- Redmond, Washington 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Niliiic Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CLIENT Shasta Beverage PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition PROJECT NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — c DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS vi ai GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - - - - _ _ 5 MC=11.40% Fines = 12.20% MC = 14.50% MC = 11.60% MC = 16.00% MC = 21.00% MC=39.10% SM ••••• ••ii• ❖.• ••_•_••• Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) 1.5 SM •;•;•;• ••00 ••.•$ ••• • •:�%• •;•• ;•; iii• •+X ••• • ii• •••••• iii• *AS Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist (Fill) -variable gravel content 0 -becomes dense, includes gray silty sand nodules - - - - - _ _ 10 Gray silty SAND with gravel, dense to very dense, moist (Fill - Old Commercial Pad) e.o SM •- ;•;•; :•X•• •••••; SP - SM Greenish - gray poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense to dense, moist 10.0 ML Gray SILT, medium dense, moist organic wet layer above -0.5" thick (old topsoil?) -wood fragments -sand layers 13.0 - - �- - ' i 9 7 ° ° J u L C FA Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 13.0 feet. Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP -2 Earth 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. PAGE 1 OF 1 SOIutiOU Redmond, Washington 98052 NW.' .c Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CLIENT Shasta Beverage PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition PROJECT NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — o DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS U.S.C,S. GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - - - - - - - -• 5 MC = 9.00% MC =10.60% MC = 8.10% MC=35.30% SM SM SM •;•;•:• '000 •••• 44+ •:•:, ••••••• •••• ••••••11:: •• •.:::$ •••••••••4 • .O'O• •:4+ v•.• •'•'•'• 000• ,•:•:•: • '••:•:• •;•;•�• •000 •000 •• •••••• Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, moist (Fill) -becomes wet 7.0 -very Tight seepage - - - - - - - - 10 Grayish - brown silty SAND with gravel, dense, moist (Fill) 8.5 SP- SM ::.':. . Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, moist 10.0 ML Gray SILT, medium dense, wet 11.0 - - s i 5. L c o5 7 Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 7.0 feet during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 11.0 feet. CLIENT PROJECT Earth Solutions NW Earth 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. 'Solution Redmond, Washington 98052 WI 1 C Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 Shasta Beverage TEST PIT NUMBER TP -3 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — c DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS U.S.C.S. GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ••v..•. Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) • _ _ .».. ••••••i .•iii - - MC = 16.20% SM •iiia •+•i -trace organic debris ••.•••. — ❖:•: -becomes medium dense - - ••iii •••••••' ••:444.5 .;•:•:., Gray SILT, medium dense, moist (Fill) 5 ••❖••4 •iii1 MC=22.30% 040: •••••A ....l ML .w ••••••, -sand layers - -1 .•O.•. .•••••. O••••i - - ••••••i •••••0 4...4, 9.0 _ _ • Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist to wet SM .• 10 MC = 14.70% �� o Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. i Bottom of test pit at 10.0 feet. . i I 5 3 D GENERAL BH / TP / WELL 1581-01.GPJ GINT US.GDT 5/19/10 Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP -4 Earth 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. ISO l utio n Redmond, Washington 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 NN'1.1.c Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 CLIENT Shasta Beverage PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition PROJECT NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE STARTED 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — c DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS vi a. GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ - _ 5 MC = 7.50% MC = 24.30% Fines = 65.00% MC = 19.00% MC = 8.80% MC = 35.40% SM *••••• ••:•:•: •••.•• •0: iiia ••O.O' ❖ X ;:;:;4.0 •::::$; •:•:4; •:*::, WV ••••O$ NN4 ••••••• ••O..•O •••••� •000, •••••••4 Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) -trace wood debris -becomes medium dense ML Gray sandy SILT, medium dense to dense, moist (Fill) -silty sand layers / interbeds 9.0 - _ 10 SM ::• Gray silty SAND with gravel, dense, moist 1 t ML 11.5 Brown SILT, medium dense to dense, wet Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 11.5 feet. CLIENT PROJECT Earth Solutions NW Earth 2881 152nd Avenue N.E. 'Solution Redmond, Washington 98052 NM i.1.1. Telephone: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 Shasta Beverage TEST PIT NUMBER TP -5 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Shasta Warehouse Addition NUMBER 1581.01 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE EXCAVATION EXCAVATION LOGGED NOTES STARTED BY 5/3/10 COMPLETED 5/3/10 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — SSR CHECKED BY grass SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": field AFTER EXCAVATION — DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER TESTS vi of GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SM •+••• ••OHO ••.••• �.o Brown silty SAND with gravel, loose, wet (Fill) - -1 - - - - 5 MC = 11.50% SP- SM • •••• •00• . .�•%� i• i APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ES -1581.01 Earth Solutions NW, LLC Earth Solutions NW CUENT Shasta Beverages, Inc. PROJECT NUMBER ES -1581.01 114:1•14nUlkl411AMal 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NAME Shasta Beverage Warehouse Addition PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 1 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 ' 1/23/8 3 4 6 810 14 16 20 30 40 50 60 100 140 200 L HYDROMETER 100 10 1 01 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL coarse fine coarse SAND •medium fine 0.01 SILT OR CLAY 0.001 Specimen Identification • TP -1 4.0ft. Classification Brown silty SAND, SM LL PL PI Cc Cu TP -4 4.5ft. Gray sandy SILT, ML 2.47 9.60 Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay • TP -1 4.0ft. 19 0.416 0.211 6.1 81.7 12.2 1 TP -4 4.5ft. 19 3.5 31.5 65.0 1 COPY 4 COPIES 1 COPY 1 COPY REPORT DISTRIBUTION ES -1581.01 Shasta Beverages, Inc. 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Mr. Nick Heaton Craft Architects Terminal Sales Building 1932 First Avenue, Suite 408 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Dean Watkins Shutler Engineering 12503 Bel -Red Road Bellevue, Washington 98005 Attention: Mr. Joe Shutler Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 — 72nd Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Mr. Dan Balmelli Earth Solutions NW, LLC C architects SHASTA BEVERAGES INC. 1227 Andover Parkway East City of Tukwila Narrative of Project Consistency with Design Review Criteria May 24, 2010 RECEIVED MAY 24 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Shasta Beverages is located in the heart of the industrial area that was developed in the 1960's and is currently in the southwest section of the TUC. It was built and has been owned and operated as a soda pop distribution facility since 1967. A future expansion was planned at the time of the original construction. Therefore, the approximately 5' high preload and future building pad were also prepared in 1967 and have essentially been left untouched for over 40 years. Current site conditions include some outdoor pallet storage in the back corner surrounded by natural grasses and one tree on the balance of the building pad. Please see attached Existing Conditions photo. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: a Shasta is surrounded by the railroad to the west and other industrial operations, some with a retail or wholesale component to them. The furniture distribution center to the north has a fire lane and parking along the fenced shared property line. The mattress and yarn manufacturing / wholesale facilities to the east are across Andover Park East. The back' sides of an appliance warehouse and spa retail operation are to the south with both of their parking Tots facing S. 180th Street. Shasta is not open to the public and it must maintain sanitary conditions because its products are for human consumption. Therefore, it is not conducive to pedestrian or vehicular connections with the adjacent properties. b. The existing sidewalk on Andover Parkway East will be maintained and the existing landscaping will be enhanced for better screening of the existing truck court. The existing street facing side of the property is currently paved with asphalt for trailer storage. We are converting some of the storage area to parking and providing another 10' of landscaping along a Targe portion of the face of the addition as wells as landscape islands at the ends of the new rows of parking. (See Landscape Planting Plan for proposed landscaping). The existing service areas are located on the south side of the existing building near the rear of the building and will remain as is. c. The existing building is approximately 30' above grade at the warehouse with an office component in the front that is approximately 15' high. The current east facing building facade is approximately 192' long and we are proposing to extend the building 150' to the north. The original building pad that was placed in 1967 extends to the north property line but we will remove a portion of it to provide a new fire lane to meet current code. 2505 Third Avenue. Suite 324 Seattle. Washinaton 98121 Phone: 206.720.7001 Fax: 206.720.2949 Shasta • • Design Review Narrative Page 2 of 5 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area: a. The new overall building size will be approximately 2/3 the size of the painted tilt -up concrete building to the north and is set back from the adjacent building to the north by approximately 75' and more than 100' from the adjacent building to the south. The new building size will be about equal to the painted tilt -up concrete building to the west and somewhat larger than the painted concrete buildings to the south. The height of the existing building and the proposed addition are comparable to the neighboring buildings. The existing building and the neighboring buildings are painted tilt -up concrete with little or no modulation and have a mixture of street and rear facing truck courts. An active rail is to the west with a spur that is currently being used by Shasta for sugar deliveries. b. The existing front yard landscaping connects to the landscaping on the adjacent properties and will be enhanced. Side yard landscaping is not required but we have proposed some perimeter landscaping along the north side of the addition along with additional parking landscaping at the northwest corner of the site. The landscaping is not located next to the building on the north side due to the existing grades to the north as well as for rodent control. c. Shasta is not open to the public. The existing neighborhood character is large box, warehouse type industrial type buildings. Shasta's existing building and the addition will remain consistent with the surrounding neighborhood in size, scale, and level of finish. d. The vehicular circulation pattern is existing and will not change. The existing driveways provide separate truck and car access. The existing truck access is also away from the main entrance of the building and will be maintained as is. e. The vehicular circulation pattern and driveway entries will not change. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: a. The existing site is flat and featureless. It was designed for this expansion over 40 years ago. There is a 4' grade drop from the original building pad to the adjacent property to the north. We will landscape the finished grade transition. b. Most of the existing asphalt area will remain and it is flat. The only new asphalt and concrete walkways will be for the fire lane, one exit and fire department access. They will all be designed to meet current code. There will be an overall gain in landscape area as a result of our expansion as shown on the Landscape Planting Plan. The existing tulip trees will remain along the street frontage and the existing ivy be removed and enhanced landscaping in theexisting street frontage landscaping will be provided. The existing mature landscaping and picnic area near the office and main entrance will be maintained. 10 253 -Shasta Design Review Narrative.doc Shasta • Design Review Narrative Page 3 of 5 c. A combination of evergreen and deciduous shrubs will be added, along with groupings of evergreen trees and groundcover to exceed the Type 1 landscape required. Planting adjacent to the building will consist of columnar deciduous trees, predominantly evergreen shrubs, accented by deciduous shrubs and groundcover. d. Planting should not be susceptible to injury as all landscape islands are surrounded by concrete curbs. All plant material has been selected to be native and/or drought tolerant. e. Both trees and shrubs will be added to enhance the overall appearance of the site and in new parking areas. f. The existing service areas are located on the south side of the existing building near the rear, they are currently screened and will remain. g. The areas around the building addition will be landscaped exceeding minimum standards with the exception of the west facade along the rail spur. h. The new exterior lighting will match the existing on the building and will meet Illuminating Engineering Societies recommendations for site lighting as indicated on the attached photometric plan. 4. Building Design: a. The proposed addition is designed to match the existing building with some enhancements that include additional reveals, paint. changes and canopies. Some modulation is also provided with building setbacks and parapet height changes. A band of darker color at the base is designed to anchor the building to the site as well as better mask the marks made by backing up trailers and dock equipment. A portion of the existing building is exposed concrete aggregate with strong vertical elements. The balance of the building is painted concrete. Our addition extends the painted concrete and includes two separate metal banded canopies similar to the existing in a bold accent color that provide strong horizontal elements and shadow relief. The existing color scheme has been revised to provide large color changes instead of small striping to break up the rectangular mass both vertically and horizontally in a similar scale to the lower office portion of the existing building and provide a consistent scale and feel across the street building facade. b. Building scale is similar to and consistent with permanent neighboring buildings and developments. c. The proposed addition is an expansion of the existing warehouse function and will be tilt -up concrete. The proposed canopy provides both visual relief by breaking up the building facade and function at the truck court. All proposed building components are similar and complementary to the existing structure. d. The existing exposed aggregate concrete will remain. The existing high contrast one color scheme will be replaced with two main warmer and more muted earthy colors. The darker colors complement the exposed 10 253 -Shasta Design Review Narrative.doc Shasta • • Design Review Narrative Page 4 of 5 aggregate. The accent color which matches Shasta's corporate blue is used strategically to highlight the horizontal bands of the canopies at a lower height to reduce the scale of the building. e. The existing roof top mechanical units above the office are currently screened. No new exposed roof top or other mechanical units are proposed. f. The proposed building mounted exterior lighting matches the existing and spaced in a similar pattern to provide safety and security as well as visual interest on the exterior of the building. g. Our goal is to have the addition complement and blend with the existing 1960's architecture. We have modernized the original design with modern metal canopies and an updated color scheme that is more in keeping with the goals of the City. We have also proposed new and enhanced landscaping that exceeds City requirements. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: a. We are adding two bike racks and placing them next to the existing landing along the existing accessible route to the main entrance. The existing picnic bench will remain. No other miscellaneous structures are proposed. b. The bike racks will be illuminated by the existing building lighting. Consistency with adopted plans and regulations (TMC 18.100.030): 6. This proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City of Tukwila in the following ways: Visually attractive — A variety of textures, materials, colors and heights have been used to create visual interest, contrast, and rhythm and turn a large rectangular mass into an attractive structure. Our design goal is to further complement the architecture of the existing building. The landscaping is professionally designed, climatically appropriate and drought tolerant. Value to the community — We believe constructing this building on a currently undeveloped portion of the site and replacing un -manicured grasses and vacant building pad with a building and professional landscaping adds value to the neighboring community. The additional building area will allow Shasta to expand their operations in Tukwila providing new local employment opportunities. Designed with pride — At Craft Architects, we are dedicated to our clients' needs and strive to exceed expectations. This building, like any other work we do, is important to us and deserves our best ideas and effort. This is Shasta's northwest distribution center and has been for over 40 years. This facility is a direct reflection of their brand. 10 253 -Shasta Desian Review Narrative.doc Shasta • Design Review Narrative Page 5 of 5 Wholesome and in harmony with adjacent uses - The site is located in a fully developed area surrounded by other industrial buildings of similar vintage. The existing neighborhood character is large box, warehouse type retail, office and industrial type buildings. This addition is consistent with that look in the neighborhood. Building scale is consistent with permanent neighboring developments. Traffic and congestion patterns — This site is currently and will continue to be accessed via Andover Parkway East. Easy access to both 1-405 and 1-5 is conveniently to the north at a signaled intersection. Upon completion, approximately four additional employees will work in the new facility for one shift between 6:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Most truck traffic will occur during the same hours. No customer or visitor traffic will occur. We believe that because the intersection is signaled, employees, neighbors and/or Tukwila residents will not notice the changes in traffic and congestion patterns. Characteristics of Tukwila's history — This project would maintain a sense of consistency in the businesses of Tukwila as it is allowed to expand at the location they have occupied since 1967. It is to the advantage of Shasta Beverages to be able to expand on their existing site rather than to relocate to a new site, both from a cost and schedule perspective. Fencing and landscape buffers provided between commercial and residential uses — not applicable; no residential uses nearby. Adequate parking and lighting — The parking is designed to meet City of Tukwila minimum parking requirements but exceeds the amount of parking required by Shasta. Shasta's current 35 stalls are adequate to meet their parking needs. The lighting on this parcel will meet the Illuminating Engineering Societies recommendations for site lighting and the City of Tukwila guidelines. The following light levels are proposed: • A minimum of 0.2 footcandles across the site • An average value slightly greater than 0.5 footcandles around the perimeter of the building • The area surrounding the existing entrance is to remain as is. Open spaces and trails — This project possesses no connection to existing trails and open spaces and proposes no new connections to trails and open spaces. It is less than one block to S. 180th Street and trail access along the Green River. 10 253 -Shasta Design Review Narrative.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department ofCommunity Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Tukwila. WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukolan6)ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its em lovees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 4 ZZ ^-1Vssvt2. elkaist eASri; '-e'Lsbt-ome •`A ..r. A ON . g� for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. ss RECEIVED MAY 2420101 COMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXECUTED at `--"'c- (city), `--J' (state), on Print Name Address Phone Number Signature •CK. c•tC r ea -1 20 e z -z- (7f &.(• E�s-r Z. Z On this day personally appeared before me Nl cA-vot S n to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS lore- DAY OF P:\Planning Forms \ Applications\ BARApp-6-06.doc, 12/04/06 20 PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing ata'F Meet`, -r ta 1"' VJ 11, t cO la 1 wA tg� My Commission expires on 3c(X n �-f' "It OLt / -i • 05-19-'10 08:07 FROM -pug icworks/dcd 2064313665 • T-646 P002/002 F-601 190 Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 9818E 206.43 3.0179 CONCURRENCY TEST NOTICE WATER For all development except one single-family residence, 2-9 lot short plats, four-plex or' Smaller multi -family residence, non-residential development that is categorically exempt from SEPA. Submit a detailed project description including location, exisiting failities, and proposed facilties. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1227 Andover Park EastPARCEL #: Contact's Name: :Betsy Dyer/Barghausen Engineers 352304-9072 ECE! M FD MAY 2 4 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Contact Phone #: 425 251-6222 Contact e-mail: bdyer@barghausen. corn Contact Address: 18215 -72nd Ave. S., Kent, WIC 98032 PASSED This test notice is valid for one-year from signature date. Capacity of the concurrency facilities with addition of capacity of the proopsed development is equal to or better than capacity required do niaintih the established level of service standard, DOES NOT PASS Fire flow would be approximately grin for hour(s). Water service will require the .following improvemet(s) to pass the concurrency test: a) Installation of and/or b) Construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or C) -Other: feet of -inch water main to rech the site; 3. The water system irripr( etncnt will require an atnendtnent to the Comprehensive Water 5—/q4 By; System Plan. Prim Name: Approved 01.01.2006 / '-� Sr. Utility Eneineer Date 05-19-' 10 08; 07 F3i011-p'lictuarks/dcd 2064313665 • T-646 P0011002 'F-601 Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206.13 3.0179 CONCURRENCY TEST NOTICE SEWER For all developinent except a single -fancily residence, 2-9 lot short plats, four-plex or RECEIVED smaller multi -family residence, or a non-residential development that is categorically • MAY 2 4 2010, exempt from SDPA. Submit a detailed project description including location, existing facilities, and proposed facilities. N17Y DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ADDRESS: a227 Andover Park EastPARCEL #: 352304-9072 Contact's Name: Betsy Dyer/Barghausen Engineers Contact Phone #: 425 251-6222 Contact e-mail: bctyer@bar-ghausen. com Contact Address -„18215 -72nd Ave. S., Kent , WA 98 03 2 PASSED This test notice is valid for one-year from signature date. Capacity of the concun-ency facilities with addition of capacity of the proposed development is equal to or better than capacity required to maintain the established level of Scrviee.standard. DOES NOT PASS 1. Sewer service will require the following improvement(s) to pass the concurrency test: a) Installation of feet of -inch sewer main to reach the site; and/or b) Construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or c) Other: 2, The sewer system inlpr vement will require an amendment to the Comprehensive Sewer System Plan_ By: Print Name: Approved 01,01,2005 1 Sr, (utility Engineer ,<-(////r..) Date Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206.433.0179 CONCURRENCY TEST NOTICE SURFACE WATER For all development except one single-family residence, 2-9 lot short plats, four-plcx or smaller multi -family residence, or non-residential development that is categorically exempt from SEPA. Submit a detailed project description including location, existing facilities, and proposed facilities. PROJECTADDRESS:1227 Andover Park East PARCEL#: 352304-9072 Contact's Name: Betsy Dyer/Barghausen Engineers Contact Phone #: 425 251-6222 Contact e-mail: bdyer@barghausen. com Contact Address: 18215 -72nd Ave. S., Kent, WA 98032 I,/ PASSED This test notice is valid for 90 -days from signature date. Capacity of the concurrency facilities combined with the addition of any detention (if required) for the proposed development is equal to or better than capacity required to maintain the established level of service standard. Compliance with the City's adopted Surface Water Manual ensures concurrency and any additional items noted below. Additional items: By: N/ DOES NOT PASS Print Name: Ryan D. Larson Approved 01.20.2006 Date Sr. Surface Water Engineer CITY OF TUKWILA Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 httn://www.ci.tukwilawa.us Permit No. Project No. (For office use only) TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. **Please Print** SITE LOCATION King Co. Assessor's Tax No.: 352304-9072 Site Address: 1227 Andover Park East Suite Number: Tenant Name: Shasta Beverage Property Owners Name: National Beverage Corporation Mailing Address: 1227 Andover Park East Type of Existing Use: Warehouse Is existing building vacant? No Tukwila WA 98188 City Stan Zip Size of Existing Use: approx . 67,000 s f For how long? N/A CONTACT PERSON - Who do we contact when your concurrency certificate is ready to be issued Name: Kathy Craft -Reich Mailing Address: 2505 Third Ave. , Suite 324 E -Mail Address: kathy@craftarchitects . com Day Telephone: 206 720-7001 Seattle city Fax Number: 206 720-2949 WA 98188 State Zip Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Construction of approx. 43, 000 sq. ft . concrete tilt -up addition to existing warehouse building, along with associated grading, paved parking, landscaping, utility connections and storm water improvements. Type of work: ❑ New ® Addition ❑ Change of use Type of Proposed Use: Office/Warehouse ❑ Remodel Size of Proposed Use: 0 Tenant Improvement approx. 43,000 sf PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES - Expiration - The concurrency test notice shall expire 90 days after issuance unless the applicant submits a SEPA or other documentation pursuant to TMC 21.04. If the submittal is made within 90 days, the test notice shall be valid for one calendar year from the date of issuance of the notice. Once the associated development permit or building permit is approved, the final concurrency certificate shall be valid for 2 years or as long as the developer possesses a valid building permit for the development. Extensions may be granted in accordance with TMC 9.50. Transferability - A certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land, but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. A certificate of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land use, density, and intensity described in the application for a development permit or building permit. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT: Signature: Date: Print Name: Day Telephone: Mailing Address: Zip City State I Date Application Accepted: Date Application Expires: Staff Initials: P:\Cyndy\Concurrency & Impact Fees\Traffic Concurrency Application 3.213-07.doc Page 1 of 2 City of Tukwila Development Application Fees for Concurrency Analysis Fees for Residential Use Fees for Non -Residential Use Unit All Types of Residential' Gross Floor Area Industrial 2 Office 3 Retail 4 Eatery 5 Institutional & Port 6 All Other Uses Between 1 and 3 $300 Less than 5,000 $1,000 $1,800 $2,700 $5,400 $500 $1,500 Between 4 and 5 $600 Between 5,001 and 10,000 $1,500 $2,700 $4,050 $8,100 $1,000 $2,000 Between 6 and 10 $1,200 Between 10,001 and 20.000 $2,000 $3,600 $5,400 $10,800 $1,500 $2,500 Between 11 and 15 $2,000 Between 20,001 and 30,000 $3,000 $5,400 $8,100 $10,800 $2,000 $2,500 Between 16 and 20 $3,500 Between 30,001 and 40,000 $4,000 $7,200 $10,800 $10,800 $2,500 $2,500 Between 21 and 25 $5,000 Between 40,001 and 50,000 $5,000 $9,000 $13,500 $10,800 $3,000 $2,500 Between 26 and 30 $6,500 Between 50,001 and 70,000 $6,000 $10,800 $16,200 $10,800 $4,000 $2,500 Between 31 and 40 $8,000 Between 70,001 and 90,000 $7,000 $12,600 $18,900 $10,800 $5,000 $2,500 Between 41 and 60 $10,000 Between 90,001 and 150,000 $8,000 $14,400 $21,600 $10,800 $6,000 $2,500 Greater than 60 $12,000 Between 150,001 and 200,000 $9,000 $16,200 $24,300 $10,800 $7,000 $2,500 Greater than 200,000 $10,000 $18,000 $24,300 $10,800 $8,000 $2,500 1 All residential uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 200-299, including single family, multi -family, mobile home parks, and shared housing s All industrial/agricultural uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 100-199, including Tight and heavy industrial, manufacturing, and warehousing 3 All office, medical, and service related uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 600-699, 700-799, and 900-999, including general office, medical facilities, and banks 4 All retail and recreation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 400-499, 800-830 and 837-899, including retail sales, rental sales, athletic clubs, and theaters 5 All food service uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 831-836, excluding accessory (stand-alone) drive-through espresso stands (or similar) under 250sf which are assessed $300 6 All institutional and transportation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 000-099 and 500-599, including schools, places of worship, day care, terminals, and transit Concurrency Application Fee TableFees Page 2 of 2 • • PUBLIC ,E,cE'vE�IEARIliTG MAY 24 20101DESI(sN CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Developmen 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA .981As Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us COMMUNITY REVIEW DEVELOPMENT NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: �` - 9Qv€,eA(ES 1 ROC. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 352,50-I go}Z DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: E-mail: Signature O i. �► (Z Q)1 -?A -1.001 l Serf. W11, FAX: LUto) ) — Z.q.._'T 9 CO Date: /r(s) P:\Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P -DR Planner: File Number: L! O '6�/\ Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: �` - 9Qv€,eA(ES 1 ROC. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 352,50-I go}Z DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: E-mail: Signature O i. �► (Z Q)1 -?A -1.001 l Serf. W11, FAX: LUto) ) — Z.q.._'T 9 CO Date: /r(s) P:\Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 (- CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone.: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL RECEIVE VIEW MAY 2 4 2010i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Shasta Bevera es Inco . orated LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1227 Andover Parkway East Tukwila, Washington 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). Parcel#:3523049072 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Kathy Craft -Reich —Craft Architects, Pile. Address: 2505 Third Avenue Suite 324 Seattle, Washington 98188 Phone: (206)720-7001 E-mail: kath ' c = ftarchitects.com FAX: (206)720-2949 Signatur: 3 ��w►�. ��,��:r`Date: \\S300-0031\_projects \_Proo) CURRENT ocuments\SEPA Forms\Shasta -SEPA Application -FINAL coordination.doc FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: (D .6/ Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Shasta Bevera es Inco . orated LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1227 Andover Parkway East Tukwila, Washington 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). Parcel#:3523049072 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Kathy Craft -Reich —Craft Architects, Pile. Address: 2505 Third Avenue Suite 324 Seattle, Washington 98188 Phone: (206)720-7001 E-mail: kath ' c = ftarchitects.com FAX: (206)720-2949 Signatur: 3 ��w►�. ��,��:r`Date: \\S300-0031\_projects \_Proo) CURRENT ocuments\SEPA Forms\Shasta -SEPA Application -FINAL coordination.doc City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: May 6, 2010 RECEIVED MAY 2 4 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicant Name: Kathryn M. Craft -Reich Street Address: 2505 Third Avenue Suite 324 City, State, Zip: Seattle, Washington 98188 Telephone: (206) 720-7001 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. \ \ S300-0031 \ _projects \ _Projects -CURRENT \ Shasta \ 3 -Documents \ SEPA Forms\Shasta -SEPA Application -FINAL coordination.doc Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 X Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 • Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 X YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 5-0 • YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 Part A (continued) 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete X YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below. the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) X YES - Continue to Question 1-4 - Part B (continued) 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 X Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. X NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 N/A Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 N/A Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 . N/A Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 N/A Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 N/A Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 3-6 N/A Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, N/A particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. N/A • NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Shasta Beverages, Inc. —Warehouse Expansion 2. Name of Applicant: Kathryn M. Craft -Reich 3. Date checklist prepared: May 6, 2010 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Preload (Sept/2010) Grading (Oct/2010) Bldg Construction (Nov/2010-Mar/2011) 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Report prepared on (05/10/2010) 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No Agency Comments \ \ S300-0031 \ _projects \ _Projects -CURRENT \ Shasta \ 3 -Documents \ SEPA Forms\Shasta -SEPA Application -FINAL coordination.doc • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Grading permit Building permit Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire/Sprinkler permits 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Approx. 43,000 sf. new tilt -up concrete addition to existing 67,000 s.f tilt -up concrete building for storage and distribution of beverage products. Existing parking & truck court to remain. 25 new parking stalls and associated landscaping to be provided in exsiting asphalt trailer storage area. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 1227 Andover Parkway E. Parcel #3523049072 is located on Andover Parkway East one lot north of the South 180th Street intersection, on the west side of the road. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Flat with existing building pad at +4'0" above adjacent asphalt truck court. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 13% maximum slope exists on the site only at transition from truck court to building pad c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, and, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached Geotechnical report noting the presence of sand and silty sand fill across the development envelope and to a depth which would meet or exceed anticipated excavations. The general soil types on site consist of gravelly sandy loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, see attached Geotechnical report. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 950 cubic yards of cut and fill material are proposed for preparation of the proposed building pad and parking area. Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Due to the flatness of the site there is a low risk of erosion. Silt fencing will be provided g. to reduce run-off of sediment. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During Construction: Silt fencing will be provided to reduce runoff sediment. Post Construction: Landscaping & surface water control 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During Construction: Small quantities of vehicle emission, paint odor & dust during grading. After Project completion: Typical quantities of vehicle emissions from on-site traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Quantities are minimal. No measures will be taken. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff from the project site will be surface runoff from the proposed building addition and pavement areas. All new surface runoff generated from the project will be collected by roof drains and catch basins and conveyed to an underground detention system prior to discharging into the existing storm system along Andover Parkway East. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No measures will be taken. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric- General purpose & Lighting Natural Gas- Freeze protection heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The building will be constructed to meet or exceed Washington State Energy Codes Agency Comments 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Existing Fire, ambulance and police 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Site safety design including signage for traffic circulation, pedestrian walkways, site lighting b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This is a busy area with typical auto & truck noise, similar to activities on our site 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction: site excavation equipment, trucks entering & leaving site, crane operation & basic construction noises. Post construction: delivery trucks & employee traffic that currently exists but will increase 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: During construction: adhere to city regulations for construction work hours. Post construction: direct & efficient egress for trucks & traffic 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Zoning is TUC (Tukwila Urban Center) Currently used by Shasta for beverage distribution. Adjacent properties to the north, east, and south are industrial. Railroad is to the west. b. Has the site been used forri ulture? If so, describe. �5 . V,htl .` teJ(.. LibtA )(vc(qVs1frF, Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing tilt -up concrete warehouse built in 1967 on site that is approximately 67,000 square feet. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. The existing will remain. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? TUC (Tukwila Urban Center) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? TUC (Tukwila Urban Center) g.. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Upon completion approximately 4 new people will work in the addition to the building. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The site is currently used for and will continue to be used for industrial distribution. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None — project is industrial only Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? +/- 30' to the top of the parapet wall from finished grade Tilt -up Concrete Wall panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. The proposed building is similar in scale to existing buildings in the area c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No measures 4 90), \ t@i �5 cjt tiV o Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: During the construction phase of the project, a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be designed in accordance with City standards to control surface runoff impacts. A permanent underground detention and water quality system will be designed and constructed in accordance with City of tukwila standards to controll surface water impacts for the developed site. Raised curbing and landscaping will also be provided. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other — tulip, X Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water slants: water lil , eelgrass, milfoil, other Other p es of ve l etation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 1 deciduous tree will be removed in the area where the addition to the building will be placed. Grass will be grubbed and removed from the same area. 1,111 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Drought tolerant & native plants will be provided. Existing landscape islands will be enhances by removing existing ivy and replacing with new shubs and ground cover. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No glare is anticipated. Security lighting is required on the exterior of the building & in the parking area due to the nature of the operations in the facility. Measures will be taken to minimize any light trespass. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: • Fixtures will be shielded to minimize any light trespass offsite. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. Surrounding area is typically retail & industrial c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None required. Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by Andover Parkway East. It is near a signaled intersection_atthe comer of S.180`h Street and Andover Parkway East. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. It is two blocks to the nearest bus stop at S. 180`h Street and Sperry Drive ° c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 25 new stalls will be added to the existing 35 stalls currently on site, for a total of 60 spaces provided. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. There is a rail spur on the west side of the property. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is anticipated that approximately 10 trips per day would be generated by the completed project. It is anticipated that the peak volume would occur between 6:30a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. g. Proposed measures to reduce or ontrol transportation impacts, if any: iinow 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. These services are existing and not expected to increase. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No specific measures are proposed 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: /electricity, /natural gas, /water, /refuse service, /telephone, /sanitary sewer, septic system other: • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricy — Puget Sound Engergy Natural Gas — Pugent Sound Energy Water — City of Tukwila Refuse service — SeaTac Disposal Telephone — Qwest Sanitary — City of Tukwila (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Agency Comments • • Shasta Building Addition 1227 Andover Park East J-QJcTc cArc, 9/ 44111 VO 15,k p 74"471 ) 5 V1(✓ ,x+heS 1 z Lc 4er r),01-0614/) 1tA,— yflivi)d '4c4) (:)(1(1"Thr\AIJ')cl ulk,44-) Ince) p,,I../14-6 p n purrs 4uaaTdopA Q `080'8z'81 DIN' 2urd13Dspuerl `z5.'81 A\ T1»}J U TsaQ `05.0'09'81 DIAII, o Topaltpo ajq jddd • 1 • • a - ttC14N,k-7 Lkr-51933/0' 60(11VD 5 GRA" ("k-`. "'5A0 5A )^ fid- p71"1/4-/ 4, r7 c,cfc5 yro^-.r i i k Khr () Altii ►) F [v/-' 'A/c- p fes- \k/\ ek.v\.circ, 1 1-,,-f viti kvc) a kit, (Attilitvl 6 1-ticvd tom,\ `,0(M • • • bt-ar) Lit,5 0V 01- vf r) (c (1t k -k"`- E kti'' ;nom`(. a% -n) tkn^ C 1AY t h 1616 7 c-44 ;1( ftitilt.{ ?(151.? 60.6 0-7 X7 (!t fi-t1 • • • • 0(7A5 `\k^^. G�i'�v ill • • • • • 6 • • • • • 7 1 • • 8 • • • • 9 • • • 10 • • • • It-I5cciQu) 51(t1/4o, _Arco, icim,1 i\o(‘-c)v\C-D(N) t.dr1 • • • • 12 • • • • • '4611 6'4 v(i3 cbo • • • �,nw 1 i krt >11 dfre,A 14 1l'Cl' 1 1 1 1 I IN • 9 1im, .77-,‘ APE „t,01,1,\-viv v)7•01 .\\ r kf)-1a, (Cc C9L+ 15 • r liP7PYTtJ. r5 Z7) cr,,it Utrittvv)L — 00014 frt./AA/to 5,-d ht/k A 61/bito 0-11611,4 efsek, (A,106 1+144 covio-ov {0,4 ekv4immt uorrk, 16 • • • • D ) S410(_. Iv715(.0 • rty,t4 crIrgi) 111-1" (b A 0_ 50- G\ cmce L2 " TA) b0(7 ,34q0 1I 10A.c6(kr, cf\, TW‘N- mik oft J-7 17 • Conclusion Staff Recommends approval of the project with the conditions specified in the staff report. 9r7i9,a 16Ktet, 1/1A 06-5119 lir(' 9Lik 1 vitt `11/1/4,_ W'`A,rk I IS'11krc,frt `7 /c y\ vie “‘,1A, ki,),1- 0, 1/(4 bogN) ottmi tt&, �,tii�l ry,.P"n„ • �btoi � �,mniSl�-�u�11 Yet nr✓GhJ� !% rm. (})rtaet 18 • • Questions? 19 Shasta Building Addition 1227 Andover Park East 1 • • • Applicable Criteria • TMC 18.60.050, Design Review ❑ TMC 18.52, Landscaping- • TMC andscapingTMC 18.28.080, Development Standard TUC 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 • 15 • • • Proposed Elevations color Learnt, IP& •.;/ • n 1/1 EL. -• cIrr 16 • • • • • 17 • • • Conclusion Staff Recommends approval of the project with the conditions specified in the staff report. 18 19 EGRESS NOTES 1 • 250' EXIT ACCESS DISTANCE PER IBC SECT. 1016.1 . GENERAL NOTES` 1. ALL WALLS TO BE TILT -UP CONC PANEL. U.O.N. 2. BUILDING AREA 55.368 NSF EXISTING WHSE 2,985 NSF EXISTING OFFICE 38.531 NSF NEW WHSE 98.884 NSF TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2. -REQUIRED PARKING: 47 WAREHOUSE93.999' SF 0 1/2.000 ]Q OFFICE 2.985 SF 03/1,000 56 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING STALLS a r c h i t e c t s .3. 35 EXISTING PARKING (1 EXISTING ADA). 25. NEW PARKING •(1 NEW ADA) 60 TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROVIDED 2505 Third .Avenue Suite 324 Seattle, WA 98121 206.720.7001.;phone 206.720.2949 fax KEY NOTES .. PROPERTY L0€ EXISTING FOOTPRINT EXISTING BLQDNG ENTRAi10E COSTING LOADING AREA EXSING DRNE-N RAMP EXISTING T10%1 DNCEOSURE www.craftarchltects.com mac molar SCRDENING COSTING ACCESSIBLE PAI8OIG STALL EXISTING CURB . EXSIWG 6'4H 04104 LINK FENCE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY NEW FOOTPRINT NEW LOADING AREA NEW DRIVE -DT RAP: NEW ACCES4BE.PARIINIG SGL. NEW OONCIETE an TAP: NEW ASPHALT FINE TEPARDADIT ACCESS NEW ASPHALT HAMMERHEAD TURNARIXDBI NEW BICYCLE RAC( & CONCRETE LANDING PER CITY OF TUKWI A PARKING STANDARDS EXISTING CONCRETE NXESEIBLE WALK EXSING LANDSCAPE BAND TO BE ENHANCED PER IAHIISCAPE .• NEW LANDSCAPE STAND EXISTING LVAI SCAPE TO RFNARI : EXISTING PICK TABLE TO REMAIN z NEw BENCH EMPLOYEE OUTDOOR ACIMTY AREA LEGEND ram IWJMINATED EIOT 911 W/ EMERGENCY POWER TO MEET IBC SECNON 1011 E ' COSTING N NEW • EXISTING OFFICE: X3,317 SF. Sheet Title: ARCHITECTURAL SITE AND EGRESS PUN .Date: 05/24/10 Design: Drown: DPW Project No: . 10-253.03 Approved: KMC, Original drawing is 21' x 36". Scale entities accordingly it reduced Sheet No: A1.1 Att dtment B Color Legend O Benjamin. Moore #1522 "Inner Balance" • Benjamin Moore #1533 "Bay Leaf" ■ Benjamin Moore #2064-10 "Bold Blue" j3n }�n� tJ'?J =rte _ 2505 Third Avenue . Suite '321 Seattle. WA 98121 206.720:7001 phone 206:720.2919 fax www.craftarchitects.com Ongind drawing is 21' x 36". $ale entities aaadnely it reduced PROPOSED BUILDING :ADDITION EXISTING 18' COTTONWOOD TO BE REMOVED ° PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME SIZE NOTES DECIDUOUS TREES •`.' 5 AGER X FREEMANII 'JEF E RSRED' / AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2° CAL B&B , a —r. 2 CARPINUS BETULUS 'FASTIGIATA'/ HORNBEAM 2' CAL B&8 EVERGREEN TREES' 0" 11 . PINUS FLEXIUS 'VANDERWOLF'S / VANDERWOLF'S PINE 12' HT. BAd3. EVERGREEN SHRUBS ' Q 27 CISIUS X PURPUREUS / ORCHID ROCKROSE MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 4' 0.C. ® 55 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM 'COMPACTA' / OREGON GRAPE MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.C. O 98 PRUNUS L 'OTTO LUYKEN'/ OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' 0.C. 47 TAXUS X MEDIA 'HICKSIP / HICKS YEW MIN. 4' HT. B&B, 4' O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS e 21 BERBERIS 1HUNBERGI 'ROSE GLOW / BARBERRY MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' O.C. 0 6 PHYSOCARPUSOPUUFOLIUS 'DIABOLO' / NINEBARK MIN. 18' HT. CONT. O 34 SPIRAEA JAPONICA 'MAGIC CARPET / SPIREA MIN. 18' HT. CONT., 3' 0.C. PERENNIALS /GRASSES .• ® 3 EUPHORBIA CHARACIAS 'WULFENII' / EUPHORBIA -1 GAL CONT. • 104 HEUCTOTRICHON SEMPEFVIRENS / BLUE OAT GRASS, GROU►OlX1VER - '1 GAL. CONT.,2' O.C. _ •_ === 680 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-un / KINNIKINNICK 4' POT 18' O.C. - 958 FRAGARIA CHILOENSIS /BEACH STRAWBERRY 4' POT 18. O.0 150 PRUNUS.L 'MOUNT VERNON' / MOUNT VERNON LAUREL 1 GAL 24' 0.C. .pp- iPilllll 111 EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN WEED AND MULCH ONLY LANDSCAPE PLAN i" = 20'-0" LEGEND TREE TYPE CALIPER 0 DBH T11066 . 1 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN / T .TUUP TREE +12 TREES TO BE REMOVED C COTTONWOOD cbe WEATHERED GRANITE (REFER TO NOTE /13) EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN. -LANDSCAPE NOTES' 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB ALL EXISTING BED AREAS ALONG ANDOVER PARK EAST,! REMOVING IVY. CARE TO BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGE TREE ROOTS' 2. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE 'AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS AND WITHIN PARKING LOT TO BE SET AT 8' MINUS FINISH ELEVATION EXCEPT AS NOTED. THESE AREAS TO RECEIVE IMPORTED 3 -WAY TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF. 12'. SUBGRADE TO BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH O? 12-18' AND ALL SPGLS (ROCK & DEBRIS > 2 DIA.) TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF NEW TOPSOIL INSTALL. PACIFIC TOPSOILS VINTER MIX IN TWO UFTS OF -6' EACH. ROTOTILL EACH UFT TO A DEPTH OF. 8' INTO SUBGRADE AU. EXISTING BEDS THAT ARE SHOWN TO RECEIVE NEW PLANTING.. TO HAVE EXISTING IVY REMOVED BY HAND WITH CARE NOT TO DAMAGE TREE ROOTS. WINTER MIX TO BE ADDED TO A 2' DEPTH, REPLACING SGL REMOVED WITH IVY. • WINTER MIX TO CONSIST OF 1/3 BY VOLUME SANDY LOAM, 1/3 BY VOLUME COMPOSTED GARDEN MULCH, AND 1/3 BY VOLUME COURSE WASHED SAND. WINTER MIX TO BE UNIFORMLLY AMENDED FOR FERTILITY AND PH AS RECOMMENDED BY A CURRENT SOILS TEST PROVIDED -BY SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY FOR NEW PLANTING (SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY, WC. 425-746-6665, TEST $A05-2) 3. ALL NEW PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE FINE -BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM- DEPTH OF 2'. EXISTING BEDS: TO BE MULCHED AS NOTED. 4. AU. PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN SELECTED TO BE DROUGHT TOLERANT. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AU. WATERING AS REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL. ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY OWNER. • 5. GROUND COVER TO EXTEND UNDER AU. DECIDUOUS TREE CANOPIES AT THE SPECIFIED SPACING TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE IN ALL PLANTING BEDS DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE GROUND COVER. GROUNDCOVER BENEATH EVERGREEN TREES TO BE MAINTAIN A 3' CLEARANCE FROM BASE OF TRUNK. • 6. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ARE BASED ON THE SITE PLANS PREPARED BY CRAFT ARCHITECTS. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY FIELD CHANGES TO. THE SITE PLANS WHICH MAY REOUIRE ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN. 7. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR GRADING AND DRAINAGE INFORMATION. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY ADVERSE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT THE HEALTH OF PLANT MATERIAL' 8. NO PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDES TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SITE DURING THE FIRST YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. 9. B & B PLANTS TO BE DUG AND SECURED PRIOR TO END OF MARCH. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION. FROM NURSERY TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 10. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO INSPECT'AND APPROVE ALL PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING TO ENSURE ACCEPTABLE QUAUTY. 11. BURLAP TO BE COMPLETLY REMCVED FROM ALL- B & B PLANT MATERIAL BEFORE BACKFIWNG OF PLANTING. 12. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE PLANTING TO BE IRRIGATED WITH A COMPLETELY AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 13. HIGH CASCADES GRANITE BOULDERS TO BE PLACED IN PLANTING BEDS AS NOTED. BOULDERS TO BE SET INTO THE SUBGADE AND POSTIONED THAT ALL EXPOSED SIDES ' OF THE BOULDER SLOPES DOWN AND AWAY FROM THE CENTER OF BOULDER. HIGH CASCADES GRANITE ARE AVAILABLE AT MARENAKO'S ROCK CENTER •PRESTON, WASHINGTON. PHONE (425-392-3313). PROVIDE A MIN. (5) 3 MAN ROCK. AND MIN. (9) 2 MAN ROCK. , ' . SON Cr MIN= REWIRED Naar 2505 Third Avenue Suite 324 Seattle. WA. 96121 206.720.7001 phone 206.720.2949 Tax www.crattarchitects.com z Q_ m w0 0 .a cc w w� m0 C/) CONSULTANT ``J B LA Landsame Architecture Site Planning lineman 1669090hhDt.SE BdEe6WA66012 phtss t.= • 17-•609 fax 1•23) •85-I56 Brat title LANDSCAPE PLAN Date Drain 6/15/2010 CB CB Projact Ne 746.00 CB Original drahring is 24 s 36 Scale entities accordndr-N reduced Shed Ne L-1 OLWI4, GRDtAE 16 501 5/09/07 ' 746-A10 Attachment D 0.6 49'7-0. 0.8 0.8 4.9-0" 0.8 1.3 0.'5.0" 3.2 2.0 2.0 0:7-0.2.3 2.5 -2.1 48.50••3.3 5 2.1 48.50••3.3 2.1 {.-i 2.5 2.0 48.'30. 3.2 2.1 0.9 1.0 InI4!IR1 0.3 0.8 o.8 0 O O •1.0 0 lcl 0.2 O CNI o O s 0 MAIN &JILTING' LINE 0.0 0.0' 0.0 •0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 « F 0 0 rd HIT Iy:K R` 1 I& HI X 1 1 IMP pi111P i IMMO!! le ' blight 111 Pleill 1M z v 1alos! , esueseeesisos sasmow>.nesss!ooseawsrwooummllnuiwssill 1 _,11111 Illi lllilf lllililililillliliililil "illi ili ildiliYlililil iilihli 1111' ECE MAY 2 COMM DEVELO AVM Rwblon Job Nomber 14770 y' of FJe:P.\140009\1477 \engineering\14770-o.dog Dale/TIme:5/21/2010 12:15 PM Seole:l:l_IREF. DHOLSTAD. %ref: ---- P� 4140ENOO4g,6 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DAelgned_2i Drown --MI Checked _AZ Approred&S_ Dale 5/21/10 SHASTA BEVERAGES, .INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY. EAST TUKWILA, WA e COVER SHEET FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDff1ON /1• 1 o c g r j`G P .. s�r1%+��°+a� A1�^ e �•\��� lei i b! ,gA� APA FCEI MAY 2 00MMW Oc1lIwJ 1 o mm ij • a ED 31 201O,. yr n Job Number 14770 GH C2,, 7. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782. FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES oagned Drown., oMN cb.aiw Approved --�- Oa1. 5/21/10 For H.ntet r-ao' Verlicol. N/A SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC.." 1227. ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA Title DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDMON Fde:P:\14000,\1477 \engineering\14770-e.dwg Dote/11me:5/21/2010 1:07 PM Scale:1:1_XREF DHO STAD Xrel: ---- .i lire �, l ummi monsiu11pflum mum ummumm minors g!!!! O.r 'F P!1 r V/ rr^^ V` y 0 bd :o D 0 0 v1 W td 0 fir, z )-40 z ni z d z A � 5 X 0 .. •A - E !- um _ a0J -"•IRI!IIIIIIIIIIRRIililili!illlililililil' �� dl li ilii Iihlili Hili ili6i41111a1 11111;i11 . R55 s9 N fxR .AR NimIRMA A --SS-,--- 394.30'.}:1 MN TO 47 ANDOVER PARK--- --�'f---7-5.� E%712 S4N. SEWER CURB CUT IIMMEIROF EX. WATER MAIN EX. 42 50 - EX. 42'SD GURR_c1R__ ,r - DRSU7 u.FirY1'I 11 yO+t •'j.r 2 SD s .AN @ EX. 42'-5D .$f .A -8mwz4 mm2SP4 I 9R8 �mm Ns Pg �Nm 2g42 P Dis9441 A. xomAti.�mmmu (In1 p 5 0 14 O SO 9q�. 5 1 O AO XF N i IVED 4 2010 • $$$ UNITY �:Gl7i No. I Dote l B, l Ckd. l Appr. Job *o,bee 14770 Sheet ' L 7 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Designed -Ai_ Drown ONN Checked . Ae Approved _M - Date 5/21/10 For Horizontal 1•_30 Vertical N/A SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST. TUKWILA, WA Revielon T1110 GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDMON RIe:P:\140005\14770\engineering \14770-gm.dwg Date/Time:5/21/2010 11:48 AM Scale:1.-07 a 1'-0 _%REF DHOLSTAD %rel: ---- STORMWATER VAULT SECTIONS AND DETAILS FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDITION BOTTOM OF VAULT r MIN 15.15 /BOTTOM OF VAULT zt' DMMEIER MANHOLE ACCESS 01P•) • • PAVED ROAD SURFACE • BOTTOM OF VAULT 5':1O' REMOVABLE CRATE � FIELD VERIFYALOCATION.214EAEANA TO WALL OF. YAULT . 3 8 - 15.15 BOTTOM OF VAULT a' ELBOW 0=21.75 ORIFICE -1 3 32 DIA BOTTOM OF VAULT • BOTTOM OF VAULT PIPE SUPPORTS: --I 3x0.090 GAGE BOLTED OR IMBEDDED, MAX 3.--00` SPACING t (MIN. ONE SUPPORT) 1E-19.10 - STAN•DPIPE FLOW RESTRICTOR RISER ///////// 2 Y 8 BOTTOM OF WALL a-15.15 'BOTTOM OF VAULT a-15.15 BOTTOM OF WALL. ..- a-15.15 Z SECTION B -B . MAY 21 2010 - THESE PLANS ARE APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE VAN THE CITY OF TUKWI A ENGINEERING DMST N. Ci e �- W N j? APPROVED BY: d' o • . DATE APPROVED: . ■e>1191nNemII INI.U.N IR1IMIII1 II • II ;01111 III Illlllllllllllililililili ilililil ilili III OffligatelBw ANA 7 WI 3 t.. N 52 CORS -C151 -"S EX. 12 $AN. SEWER CURS CUT M i R CEI1/WO y 24 1010 Ie11NrY • Job Number 14770 Sit ,g m No. Dots BY Ckd. App. 1 . Revision C5of 7 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENLAL SERVICES Deegned AS Drown DNI Checked _Ai Approved _S_ Dote 5/21/10 i'de:P:\14000.\14770\engineering\14770—ew.dwg Dole/Sme:5/21/2010 12:53 PM .Scole:1'-0' - t.—O'J(REF Scale: Norltontal 1.-b' VerUcol N/A SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA WATER MAIN PLAN FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDITION m • 0 vs :r • 0 bd z • z ,:! m • 0 Gm) cn • 0 Z 1-1° o (4-) 33 • to 33O z d 0 4-) w z m • D z d � I.-.4 O > 1 I ECEI ED MAY 2 20101 CO -200° CO -2:o u F Revision IGH Sheet • 0 C6„ 7 per. 0104 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX . CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Designea, Drown _Di Chucked �S Approved' _AS_ Dole 5/21/10 Scale: For Horlxontol Vertical N/A SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDMON FD.:P:\I4000e\14770\ engineering \l4770—d2 dog 0ate/Time5/21/2010 12.16 PM Scalerl•I_%REF OHOLSTAD %ret:.---- ~ i ! 111 I � zap �� �ssm� V op 8di4 ! §il 9!: qx 108 ,Ag8 1- qbg� � � !NJJ .ugi118 lit `;>a •IP" gFd 40'2' 0 • 10 :I Si 1 ilk 4 � g� � x y Gd tTi 4 0 0 z co c 0 z ECEI'• MAY 2 pCQMMU rED 2010' mwr . Job Nunber. 14770 Shoe • C7„ 7 • r, 0 m 0 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX aG 4.410* CML ENGINEERING. LAND PLANNING, 4'440 ENOV°4 SURVEYING. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DoIgned �t Drawn FNM Choclawi A__55- Date 5/21/10 PJe:P:\14000,\14770\ engineering \14770-dt.dwg Date/TIno:5/21/2010 11.40 AM Scalrl 15RE" For SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA Title: CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDMON OHOLSTAD Xrel. ---- cz IN o g 418p ;3 Qi m m 4&) °I> 4 .5> �v m7c z o 4 $si9i 8' 91 w2 o . m la 0 4 4 C) ig= €-1 _" ° � 1; iA o O .o / Z C / g � 4 394.30'± M TO YH •,; AO rag Y gi 1%! M N at •EIVED 2 4 20101 MU PIff14Nm y• p6 r/ e• Job Number 14770 1 ,, 1 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML. ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES F1e:P:\14000s\14770\ survey \14770T001.dwg Dote/Tme:5/21/2010 9:30 MI Scole:l• . 1' D.elpnw Brown CMekw _IR_ Approved _EL Dot. 4/29/19 N1 a IS/21/10I 1SL I d I TS r I RENSED NOTES PER TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT STD. Horizontal 1• . 20' Ved icel SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARK EAST. TUKWILA, WA ll TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PORTIONS OF THE NE 1/4, NE 1/4; SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 04 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON ILANNTREE %rel: , 1477080V.dwg 0 151' :330 60 q CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 • NOTE: PROPOSED BUILDING ADOmON SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED FROM EXISTING BUILDING. quo -o21 • WATER MAIN PLAN • FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDITION APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING I CATCH BASIN I 616 - 24.71 3' CONC N= 23.16 1/ 0" CONC F = :2.91 • 1 r -r 25 IPAf? INC,0141.5 - APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. HYDRANT CATCH BASIN RIM =74.34 8'CONCE=22.24 (NO PIPE TO W. FOUND) CO CR OUN' J STP,EET 11541 Th J -809- J -BOX -7 CA711 BASIN -1 RIM =2283 8" CONC N - 22 22 VA LS - INSTAL 1-90 BEND ( ) CONCRETE BLOCKING CONC „ 14I PAR 1NGI WATER -r VALVE 11/4..,.;K T T I WATER • VALVE II N881:18' L5.1 AIA.00C c3 CJS 1 VALVE. 17 -SEWER MANHOLE A RIM = 23.52 12' .PIPE N= 16.49 12" PIPE S - 16.53 8' PIPE E - 16.53 8' PIPE W = 16.53 (PIPES PVC OR D.I.) j' -STREET LIGHT 6 J-802 EX. FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE INSTALL: 1-8'K8' TEE (MJ,51) 1-8' CAP (MJ) 1 -FIRE HYDRANT ASSY. PER CITY STD. CONCRETE BLOCKING PROPOSED BUILDING ADDf11ON FF EL=30.0 r GATE 119 TMERHE40 SPRINKLER 04 B11ti OVERHEAD / SPRINKLER. ON BLOC / /' GATEf R9..,,. -CATCH 3A519 614 - 24.61 E"O.1. E=23.31 6.1 M IT CATCH HASP! E RiM = 24.63 12' CONC E = 20 41 (DOES NOT CONNECT TO CATCH BASIN C) CATCH BASIN F RIM - 24.25 18' CONC H: 19.90 15' CONC S = 20.05 12' CONC W = 20.05 WOOD 51EFS- EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN FF EL=30.0 .MAIN 800.0150 ;INE N88'08'0114 470.00' {nn 1 `8142.0160 CANOPY CATCH BA£IN G.. P:M = 73 79 18' COM; 11 = 20 38 15' CONC 3 - 20.44 ) TELEPHONE -f. w MANHOLE r SEWER MANHOLE A h1 / 811.4 - 25.39 12" PIPE 14 = 18.16 12' PIPE S = 18.20 6' PIPE 4 = 18.20' 8' PIPE W - 18.20 I (PIPES PVC OR 0.1.) STORM MANHOLE CATCH BAS1N 0 R M - 22.71 18' CONC E= 19.27 18' CONC W= 19.33 -CATCH BASIN C RIM = 22.74 18' CONC E = 19.37 18' CONC W = 19.37 (DOES NOT CONNECT 10 CATCH BASIN E) GAS VALVE I �WATFR V4LVE d`.I It�il Io 11 INSTALL: 1 1-B •6, TEE (Fl) 1 1-8' GATE VALVE (FL`KMJ) GATE TOR (0VALVE MINN NJ) 1-8' ADAP,44 C 1 CONCRETE BLACKING ; :1 25 t 040 VALVE „n. 8' FIRE ----- CATCH B:SIN FIELD IACATE EX. 8' FIRE MAIN AND INSTALL: I I I I I I I I I 1 l'i'?LG EX. FDC CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CRY AND FIRE MARSHALL TO UPGRADE THE EJOSI190 CHECK VAULT ASSEMBLY TO NEW STANDARD CONTRACTOR ALSO REQUIRED TO INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER TO EX. WATER METER -W �- EX. FIRE HYDRANT SEWER MANHOLE A I / RIM - 25.39 12' PIPE N= 19.16 12' PIPE S = 18.20 8' PIPE E=18.20 8' PIPE W 18.20 (PIPES PVC ON D.I.) RECEIVE MAY 2 4 201 COMMUNITY DE FLAP__MFI A i A BUILDING ADDMON 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA 11111 11111 los cm^THESEIA PNS ARE APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DMSION. APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: 0 N LJ Z , CD N ONO N < co 3 N N B UJ IC) 00 LLI Y �� 01 .dwg Dote/fime5/21/2010 • GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) MEASURES ON THE APPROVED PLANS ARE MINIMUM REOUREMOBS. 2. BEFORE BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ESTABLISH THE CLEARING UMTS, INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AND INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. MEASURES. 3. BEFORE ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS, ALL DOWNSTREAM EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (ESC) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL ESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE ESC PLAN. 4. 5. 6. ESC MEASURES, INCLUDING ALL PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL SITE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED. FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED MEAS THAT WILL REMAIN UNWORKED FOR SEVEN DAYS OR MORE FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL REMAIN UNWORKED FOR TWO DAYS OR MORE IN ADDITION TO COVER MEASURES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL A PROTECT STOCKPILES AND SILLP CUT AND FILL SLOPES IF UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 12 HOURS. B. STOCKPILE, ON SITE, ENOUGH COVER MATERLALS TO COVER All. DISTURBED AREAS. C. BY OCTOBER 8, SEED ALL AREAS THAT WILL REMAIN UNWORKED DURING THE WET SEASON (OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30). MULCH ALL SEEDED AREAS. 7. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ESC MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED MMNIENANCE SCHEDULE MAY RESULT IN THE WORK BEING PERFORMED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE DIRECTOR AND ASSESSED AS A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY WHERE SUCH FACILITIES ARE LOCATED. 8 DURING THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT, THE PERMITEEE SHALL MAINTMN IN GOOD CONDITION AND PROMPTLY REPAIR, RESTORE, OR REPLACE ALL GRADE SURFACES; WALLS, DRAINS, DAMS, STRUCTURES, VEGETATION, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, AND OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS. 9. THE PERMITTEE SHALL MONITOR THE DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE FEATURES, ANO SNAIL WITH THE DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL. REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITION RESULTING FROM PROJECT -RELATED WORK. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE PER APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. THE PERMITTEE IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A SET OF APPROVED PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ASSOCIATED PERMITS ON THE JOB SITE. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL FEDERAL STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS. 11. AS TILE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS, THE PERMITTEE SHALL INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PER THE ESC AND SHALL INSTALL .THE DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES BEFORE ANY SITE DISTURBANCE OCCURS. BEFORE THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE REMOVED. INSTALL AND ESTABLISH THE UPSTREAM PERMANENT ESC MEASURES. 12. THE PERMII I LE SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROTECT SENSITIVE AREAS, THEIR BUFFERS, AND ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR EASEMENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. THE PERMITTEE SHALL RESTORE, TO THE STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT, SEN5TINE AREAS. THEIR BUFFERS. AND PUBUC AND PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE PER817100'5 OPERATIONS. 13. PERMITTEE SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: A NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WITHIN 48 HOURS FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF ESC MEASURES. B. OBTAIN PERMISSION IN WRING FROM THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO MO0IFIING THE ESC PUN. C. MAINTAIN ALL ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER FACILITIES AS IDENTIFIED IN THE ESC PLAN. D. REPAIR ANY SILTATION OR EROSION DAMAGES TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND D611148GE FAC1LITES. E. INSPECT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED ESC INSPECTION SCHEDULE AND MAKE NEEDED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. FILTER FABRIC FENCE INSTALLATION NOTES 1. THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL 8E PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGEMER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST, WITH A MINIMUM 6 -INCH OVERLAP, AND BOTH ENDS SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST. 2. THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE CONTOURS (WHERE FEASIBLE). THE FENCE POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MA%IIM08 OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND (MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES). 3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED, ROUGHLY 8 INCHES WIDE AND 12 INCHES DEEP, UPSLOPE AND ADJACENT TO THE WOOD POST TO ALLOW THE FILTER FABRIC TO BE BURIED. 4. WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED, A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING HEAVY DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 INCH LONG, TIE WIRES OR HOG RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE TIMI 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. 5. THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL 8E STAPLED OR WIRED TO THE FENCE. AND 20 INCHES OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO COSTING TREES. 6. WHEN EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSE POST SPACING ARE USED, THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE IMT BE ELIMINATED. IN SUCH A GSE, THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIREC11.1 TO THE P051S WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF STANDARD NOTE 5 APPLYING. 7. THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 3/4 -INCH MINIMUM DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL. 8. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THOR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABIUZED. 9. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST ONLY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. PL1 G2P/ • 161E1' (CENTERED IN C.B.) HANDLING STRAP goAOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND CipTAILS Foa SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDITION OVERFLOW PROTECTION INSERT SHALL 8E DIRTRAP, ULTRA DRAINOUARD OR APPROVED EQUAL SKIRT HANDLING STRAP 560971T COLLECTION EROSION CONTROL CATCH BASIN INSERT NOT TO SCALE MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION FABRIC: APPARENT OPENING SIZE (605) GRAB TENSILE STRENGTH: PUNCTURE STRENGTH: MULLEN BURST: TRAPEZOIDAL TEM WATER FLOW RATE PERMEABILITY: 211,002142 SKIRT: SOCK FILTER/SEPARATOR: NEE ULE PUNCHED NON -WOVEN GEOTEX11L0 MATERIAL FABRIC IS RESISTANT TO ULTRAVIOLET AND BIOLOGICAL DEGREDATION AND A BROAD RANGE OF CHEMICALS. 80 US STANDARD SIEVE (0.180 MM) 200 LBS 130 LBS 400 PSI 85 LBS 110 GPM/FT2 0 38 CM/SECOND 24'.36" 10` Dx 24"L CONSULT FEDERAL STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF INSERTS 2"42"x14 GA WIRE OR EQUIVALENT, IF 5161/0 RD . STRENGTH FABRIC IS USED FILTER FABRIC MATERAL MIN. 4"74" TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE SOIL OR 3/4 - 1.5" WASHED GRAVEL _ 2"44" WOOD POSTS, STEEL "ENCS POSTS, REOAR, OR (00I/ALENT JOINTS IN FR1E0 TABRIC SHA1 BE SPLICED AT POSTS USE STAPLES, WIRE RINGS, OR EQUNAIEN'T TO ATTATCH FABP.0 TO POST 2"42'x14 GA. WIPE OR EQUIVALENT. F STANDARD STRENGTH TABRIC IS 05E0 411=11#11=11-Z11 II lI ,i il=hall Ik IE11=H 71 MIN. 4"44- TRENCH -7- 71 u 6' MAX 08' MIN= VRAED 2"x4" WOOD POSTS, STEEL FENCE POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUIVALENT EOM FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOT TO SCALE NOTFs. 1. CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING & CLEANING THE APPROACH ON A REGULAR BASIS. 2. IF DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY ADDITIONAL QUARRY SPALLS MUST BE ADDED. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION APPROACH MUST BE LOCATED AT THE PERMANENT APPROACH LOCATION. 0 L.. 0: IC R=25' MIN, 12" 4"-6" QUARRY SPALLS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE OVERFLOW EL=25.0 PIAN 4'04' CONC. PAD 24" a CMP PERFORATED STANDPIPE 0" -TO 31' -SO (11?) 24" 0 CMP PERF. STANDPIPE 1" 0, I:0. Ai 10" O -C 10 PER ROW TOTAL 40 PERF. 2`' 4" WASHED ROCK GRAVEL CONE WELD ALL AROUND L.0=23.0 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE POND BOTTOM=22.5 6" DUD STORAGE FOR SEDIMENTATION TRAP NOT TO SCALE DEMOLITION NOTES: 1. ALL PAVEMENTS, CURBS, GROUND COVER, UTILITIES. ETC. INSIDE DEM01<1106 UNITS SHALL BE REMOVED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PUNS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CAP/PLUG ALL UTILITIES WHICH ARE TO BE ABANDONED OR REMOVED. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE THAT ALL NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED AND NECESSARY PRECONSTRUCTION MEETINGS HELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROXIMITY OF WORK AREA LOCATED PRIOR TO WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT AND PRESERVE ALL IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE WORK AREA ANY DAMAGED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE 5. DEWATERING OF TRENCHES MAY BE NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF. ANY PUMPED WATER IN A MANNER DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BY THE CRY. TEMPORARY "V' DITCH NOT TO SCALE 1.0' MIN. SWALE SIOPE 0% - 5% CHECK DAM SPACING 150 5% - 10% 100 > 10% 50' 3' 3' SHALE FLOWUNE ROCK CHECK DAM 0.5' MIN. KEY ROCK INTO SWALE 0.25' (MIN.) SWALE X-9EC11201 AT ROCK O ECIS DAM I 5' RAW .4111 KEY ROCK INTO SWALE MIN. 0.25' BOCK DAM X -BEC ON ROCK CHECK DAM DETAILS SUMP BEHIND ROCK CHECK DAM SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY, AND CLEANED WHEN COLLECTED DEBRIS EXCEEDS 1/2 OF ITS DEPTH NOTE ROCK SHALL BE 4" MINUS QUARRY ROCK. NOT TO SCALE RECEIVED ►MAY 24 201C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 li 8 U z z aco0 0 g m a9 Z = m CO THESE PLANS ARE APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DMSION. APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: n 4- O 3 T N. U • 0 • CITY OF 'TUKWILA WATER GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL 8E IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION; WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBUC WORKS ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER, 1994 EDITION. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. 2. AN APPROVED COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS W PROGRESS. 3. R SHALL RE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY IN CRY RIGHT-OF-WAY. 4. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CRY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (433-1850) MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCTKON MEETING. 5. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILLTI6 SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABUSHED BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. R I5 THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY- OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID AM OTHER UTILMES NO SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PIAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED IF A UIIUTY CONFLICT EXISTS. • 6. THE WATER MAIN DISTRIBUTOR SYSTEM SHALL 8E CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PROPER AGENCY. 7. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE SEALED OFF UNTIL. CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. NO CONNECTIONS WILL BE ALLOWED . UNTIL THE NEW WATER MAINS HAVE PASSED ALL PRESSURE MLD PURITY 14.545. 8. WATER LIMN PIPE. BEDDING, AND TRENCH COMPACTION: A. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE TO BE CEMENT UNED, CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON, CONFORMING TO A.N.S.I SPECIFICATIONS A-21.51 (A.W.WA 0151-76). OR LATEST REVISION. CEMENT MORTAR LINING AND SEAL COATING SHWA CONFORM TO A.N.S.I. A-21.4-74 (A.W.WA 0104-74), OR LATEST REVISOR. B. PIPE JOINTS TO BE PUSHED -ON, MECHANICAL OR FLANGE JOINTS. C. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE FITTINGS TO 8E CEMENT LINED, CLASS 250 CAST IRON, CONFORMING TO A.N.S.I. A-21.10 AND A-021.11-77, OR LATEST REVISION, D. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE BEDDING TO BE AP.WA CLASS C. E. ALL WATER MAN CEMENT CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS TO CONFORM TO STANDARD DETAILS SHOWN ON THE PIONS. F. ALL WATER MAIN TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 92% DRY OPTIMUM DENSITY PER A.S.T.M. D-1557-70 (MODIFIED PROCTOR) PRIOR TO TESTING WATER MAINS FOR ACCEPTANCE. 9. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE 10' AND SMALLER TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM COVER AT 36 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS OCCUR, WATER MAINS ARE TO BE LOWERED TO CLEAR. 10. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL 8E PRESSURE It5I1U AND DISINFECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND CRY OF MORA STANDARDS. ALL INSPECTION AND PRESSURE TES1I90 SHALL BE DONE W THE PRESENCE OF, AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF, THE CRY ENGINEER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. 11. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PLUGS AND/08 TEMPORARY BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLIES FOR TESTING AND PURITY ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO FINAL TIE IN. 12. FIRE HYDRANTS: A ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD PUN NOS. W-3, W-4. W-5, ANO W-8. B. ALL FIRE HYDRANT PORTS SHALL FACE PERPENDICULAR TO CURB AND TOWARD DRIVEWAY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 13. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES: A ALL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE LINES TO BE TYPE 'K COPPER. STANDARD GALVANIZED, STEEL PIPE, OR PVC PIPE SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF WKWM STANDARD PLAN N0. 202 OR N0. 203 (DOUBLE STRAPS AND CORPORATION STOPS). B. METER BOXES TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTACTOR. C. METERS TO 8E INSTALLED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 14. BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SPRING UNE OF ANY WATER ANN. 15. ALL WATER MANS NOT IN PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE 10 -FOOT WIDE EASEMENTS TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 16. ALL FITTINGS SHALL 8E CAST IRON OR DUCTILE, WITH FLANGED OR MECHANICAL JOINT CONNECTION, AND BE THE SAME THICKNESS CUSS AS THE PIPE USED. 17. LIVE TAPS TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 18. ALL PIPE FITTINGS TO BE U51ED AND LABELED U.S. FOR FIRE SERVICE: INSTALLED, 14.5140 AND FLUSHED AS SPECIFIED BY NEPA STANDARDS N0. 13 AND N0. 24. PROPERLY COMPLETED CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL AND TEST CERTIFICATES ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO WASHINGTON SURVEYING 0145 RATING BUREAU AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA. duo 0Q1 CITY OF TUKWILA SANITARY SEWER GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE W ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION.' WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER, 1994 E01110N. TOGETHER WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING STANDARDS. CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS • FOR SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. BUILDING ADDITION 2. AN APPROVED COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION 15 IN PROGRESS. 3. R SHALL 8E T140 SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. 4. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY, THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (433-1850).MUST BE CONTACTED FOR A PRECONSTRUCDON MEETING. • 5. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING LMLHES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORO5 A140 SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. RIS THE SOLE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN, AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER MUTES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATOR SERVICE (1-600-422-5555) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY .CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS 6. THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PUNS WHICH ARE 014 FILE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PUNS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE PROPER AGENCY. 7. ALL NEW SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE SEALED OFF AT THE EXISTING TRUNK CONNECTION POINT um_ ALL UPSTREAM CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, CLEANED, TESTED, LAMPED, AND ACCEVTED BY THE 8. MANHOLES AND UDS: A ALL TYPE I - 48 -INCH MANHOLES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER W5DOT/APWA STANDARD DETAIL B-234, WITH ECCENTRIC CONES. B. AU. MANHOLES SHILL HAVE A MINIMUM DROP OF 0.10 FEET BEIIYEEN MOTS. C. AIL MANHOLES NOT IN PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. D. R SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ALL MANHOLE TOPS TO MATCH FINAL ASPHALT ELEVATIONS AND GROUND ELEVATIONS IN LANDSCAPED AREAS. 9. SEWER PIPE, BEDDING. AND TRENCH COMPACTION: A. ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING AS DESIGNATED: 1. P.V.C. CONFORMING TO 4.S.T.1.4. 5-3034, SDR 35. 2. DUCTILE IRON. CLASS 50, CONFORMING TO AW.WA C151. 3. PIPE MAY BE ANY OF THE ABOVE PROVIDED: A) PIPE JOINTS MUST BE OF 7146 SAME MATERIALS. AND B) WHERE A PIPE MATERIAL IS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THAT MATERIAL MUST BE USED. 4. MINIMUM PIPE COVER AT MANHOLES SHALL BE 8,0 FEET AND 5.0 FEET BETWEEN RUNS. B. PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE AP.WA TYPE 'F' WITH MATERIAL CONFORMING TO SECTION 9-30.744(2): C. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 9214 DRY OPTIMUM DENSITY PER A.S.T.M 0-1557-70 (MODIFIED PROCTOR) PRION TO TESTING SEWER UNE. FOR ACCEPTANCE 10. SIDE SEWER LATERALS: A SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE 6 -INCH MINIMUM DIAMETER AT 2.014 MINIMUM SLOPE 8. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE TESTED FOR LEAKAGE AT THE SAME RAE THE MAIN UNE SEWER IS TESTED. IF NOT It541D TOGETHER, PROVIDE TEST TEES AT SEWER MAIN CONNECTIONS. C. BUILDINGS WITH GREATER THAN 10 UNIT SHALL BE SERVICED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: 1. DOUBLE 6 -INCH DIAMETER SEMITES CONNECTED TO TRUCK E' STANDARD TEES OR 17ITO MANHOLE. 2. SINGLE 8 -INCH DIAMETER SERVICE WITH CLEANOUT, CONNu.ItU TO TRUNK INTO MANHOLES ONLY. (ALTERNATE CONNECTION METHODS ARE DEPICTED ON PLANS). D. All LATERAL CONNECTIONS TO SEWER MANS SHALL BE MADE WITH A WYE OR SWEEPING TEE 11. CONSTRUCTION OF DEWATERING (GROUNDWATER) SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AP.WA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 61-3.02, 1981 0011109. 12. WHENEVER SEWERS MUST CROSS UNDER WATER MAIN THE SEWER SHALL BE WD AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE TOP OF THE SEWER UNE IS AT LEAST 36 INCHES BELOW THE BOTTOM ON THE WATER MAIN. 13. BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SPRING UNE OF ANY SANITARY SEWER PIPE 14. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL GRAM 10' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS TO THE CRY OF TUKWILA. 15. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE FOR • • LATERALS ENTERING THE PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAY. CITY OF TUKWILA STORM DRAINAGE NOTES 1. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET CITY OF 11.1061A DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN MD CONSTRUCTION SRMNDARDS, AND THE CURRENT KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. 2. . MARK ALL STORM DRAIN 178115 WITH `DUMP 710 WASTE" AND EITHER 'ORNN5 TO STREAMS', "DRAMS TO WETLANDS', OR 'DRAINS TO GROUNDWATER, AS APPUCABLE. 3 DRIVEWAY CULVERTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT 10140141 TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3:1 SLOPE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH, CULVERTS SHALL L HAVE BEVELED 0140 SECTIONS MAT MATCH THE SIDE SLOPE CITY OF 1UKW0.A STANDARD CONSTRUCTION NOTES. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT ONE -CALL (1-800-424-5555) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. CONTACTS P80 40CT MANAGER: DESIGN ENGINEER: OWNER: OTHER: GENERAL 1. LOCATIONS SHOWN -FOR EXISTING UTILTT16 ARE APPROXIMATE 2. AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARING PROJECT SITE WORK, NOTIFY THE UTIUTIES INSPECTOR AT 208-433-0179. 3. REQUEST A PUBUC WORKS UTILITY INSPECTION AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CAWNG 206-433-0179. 4. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORKER SAFETY, AND DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES AND 114PROVEMEMS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE PERMIT(S) AND CONDITIONS. THE APPROVED PLANS, AND A CURRENT COPY OF CITY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT GUIDEU446 AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE 6. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THESE APPROVED DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED PUNS REQUIRE PRE -APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER, AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 7. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET CITY OF TUKWIU DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PUBUC WORKS DIRECTOR. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CURRENT SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS ON-STIE. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS PRIOR TO PROJECT FINAL APPROVAL 10. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL AND STREET MAINTENANCE PUN FOR PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION. 11. ALL SURVEYING FOR PUBUC FACILITIES SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A WASHINGTON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR. VERTICAL DATUM SHALL BE NAVD 1988. HORIZONTAL DATUM SHALL BE WASHINGTON STATE (GRID) COORDINATES. NORTH ZONE, USING NAO 83/91 SURVEY CONTROL A110 OED TO ANY TWO CITY OF TUKWILA HORIZONTAL CONTROL MONUMENTS. FOR PROJECTS WITHIN A FLOOD CONTROL - 20146, THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE CONVERSION CALCULATIONS TO NGVD 1929. 12. REPLACE OR RELOCATE ALL SIGNS DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. 13: RETAIN, REPLACE OR RESTORE EXISTING VEGETATION IN RIGHTS -0F -WAY , EASEMENTS, AND ACCESS TRACTS. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE PER APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. THE PERMITTEE IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A SET OF APPROVED PUNS, SPECIFICATIONS, 0780 ASSOCIATED PERMITS ON THE JOB SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED M ACCORDANCE WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE. AND LOCAL LAWS PERMITTEE SHALL APPLY FOR A REVISION FOR ANY WORK NOT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. 2. PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S INSPECTOR(S) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK. 3. WORK IN ROADWAYS A ALL WORK IN ROADWAYS SHALL MEET TMC 11 AND THE FOLLOWING: B. PRIOR TO ANY ACTIVITY IN CRY RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE THE CRY A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR RE11EW AND APPROVAL THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION, ADDRESS AND DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW DURING THE WORK AND SHALL MEET WITCO REQUIREMENTS. C. ALL WORK REQUIRING UNE CLOSURES MUST BE BY PERMIT ONLY. FROM THE THIRD THURSDAY IN NOVEMBER TO THE FOLLOWING JANUARY 2140, THE DIRECTOR DOES NOT ALLOW LANE CLOSURES IN THE TUKWILA URBAN CENTER. D. FIRE, PEDESTRIAN. AND VEHICULAR ACCESS TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES, EXCEPT WHEN PERMITTEE HAS PERMISSION FROM THE BUILDING OWNER AND THE DIRECTOR TO CLOSE AN ACCESS. E. ALL ROADWAYS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF DIRT A140 DEBRIS USING STREET SWEEPERS. USE OF WATER TRUCKS FOR CLEANING ROADWAYS REQUIRES PREAPPROVAL FROM THE DIRECTOR F. INSTALL STEEL PLATES OVER ANY TRENCH, AT AM TIME WORK IS STOPPED AND THE TRENCH IS LEFT OPEN. UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION OPERATIONS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL APPLICABLE SHORING LAWS FOR TRENCHES OVER 4 -FEET DEEP. ALL TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL MEET PASHA REQUIREMENTS. 2. POWER, CABLE, FIBER OPTICS, AND TELEPHONE ONES SHALL BE IN A TRENCH WITH A 5' MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION FROM OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 3. ADJUST ALL MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, AND VALVES IN PUBUC RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR EASEMENTS AFTER ASPHALT PAVING. 3' 20' ACCESS ROAD PROPOSED BUILDING F F. EL=30.0 EX. GROUND 2' HIGH EXTENDED CONCRETE CURB ACCESS ROAD SECTION A -A O NOT TO SCALE - - C3 3' COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS 'B' A.C. PAVEMENT 6' COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK BASE COURSE OR 2-4/2' ATB 12' SUBCRADE COMPACTED TO 951 TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION NOT TO SCALE PROVIDE PVC DRAIN- AT PLANTER LOWPOINT gVADN R -PROVIDC DRAIN ROCK AT PIP_ END ASPHALT EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 z 6 M to S z RECEIVED MAY 242010' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THESE PUNS ARE APPROVED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE CRY OF TUKWILA ENGINEERING DIVISION. APPROVED BY: DATE APPROVED: r Dote/TtmeS/?1/2010 1140 AIA S_aln PA 14000s\14770\engin Ili tom y,'; .rrrtkr +?vine. PI c ' S1.0404 % �PL rsiMOWN Q$t $? rl0. crtith€r' Tr[ VICINITY MAP NTS C a r c h i t e c t s SHASTA BEVERAGES, INC. 1227 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA, WA. 98188 NORTH y—� Shasta Beverage Project Site N IMIMMEOMMINN 309 ft CityGIS Copyright © 2006 All Rights Reserved The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. Attachment A DESCRIPTION ® COOPER LIGHTING — LUMARK®energy ;O;UtionS The Lumark Warrior offers a variety of lamp and mounting options in high pressure sodium and metal halide, and can be installed, lamped and serviced with the most basic tools. U.L. listed and labeled for wet locations. CSA certified. The Warrior is the ideal floodlight for many area outdoor lighting situations, including parking lots, construction and storage sites, rail yards, light industrial locations, marinas and service areas. SPECIFICATION FEATURES ;.. E> Catalog i MPWR-65-(S or T)-250... .Type " Projects Shasta Beverage =Date comments•- . _ I Willait _fin` Prepared by Pacific Lighting Systems A ... Retaining Screws Corrosion -resistant captive retaining screws. B ... Housing Weather -resistant, die-cast aluminum housing with integral door hinges is finished in dark bronze polyester powder coat. C ... Housing Door Watertight die-cast aluminum housing door is finished in dark bronze polyester powder coat. Cast ridge for water tight seal against gasketing. A B c D E - F H D ... Reflector Specular aluminum reflector delivers sharp beam cutoff. E ... Gasket Full circumference, high-temperature foam -in-place silicone gasketing seals out external contaminants. - F ... Lens Clear tempered -glass lens is heat and impact -resistant. G ... Socket Mogul -base porcelain socket, except 100W Metal Halide and below has medium -base. 1 1/2• 138mm1 DIMENSIONS H ... Ballast High power factor ballast with class H insulation. Minimum starting temperature is -40°C (-40° F) for HPS and -30°C (-20°F) for MH and MP. I ... Mounting Variable mountings of either 3/16" galvanized steel trunnion (shown below) or integral die-cast aluminum slipfitter (shown in photo to right). Slipfitter fits 2 3/8" - 3" O.D. tenon. Heavy-duty steel yoke provides flexibility in mounting and aiming from a variety of surfaces. TRUNNION YOKE MOUNT DRILL PATTERN i° 1" 125mm1 9/16" [14mm] 7/8. 122mm] dia. hole (2) dia. hole LL 17/e• 148mm1 3 3/4" 195mm1 TRUNNION MOUNT SLIPFITTER MOUNT YOKE MOUNT COOZt Lighting www.cooperlighting.com 2 " 2' [51mm] Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. WR WARRIOR 100-400W High Pressure Sodium Pulse Start Metal Halide Metal Halide SLIPFITTER-MOUNTED TRUNNION -MOUNTED OR YOKE -MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT TECHNICAL DATA U L. Wet Location Listed CSA Certified Class I Div 2 Rated (Groups A,B,C,D) (HAZ option) 25°C Maximum Ambient Temperature External Supply Wiring 90°C Minimum Internal Supply Wiring 150°C Minimum EISA Compliant Qe ENERGY DATA High Reactance Ballast Input Watts 100W HPS NPF (130 Watts) 100W MP NPF (128 Watts) 150W HPS HPF (190 Watts) 150W MP HPF (185 Watts) CWI Ballast Input Watts 250W HPS HPF (300 Watts) CWA Ballast Input Watts 200W MP HPF (227 Watts) QE I 250 MP HPF (283 Watts) pe I 320W MP HPF (365 Watts) Qe 350W MP HPF (400 Watts) pe 400W HPS HPF (465 Watts) 400W MP HPF (452 Watts) 0 EPA Effective Projected Area: 1.3 @ 45° SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: 35 Ibs. (16 kgs.) rhy/1 eR7o ADH082294 01/18/2009 11:45:37 AM yyR WARRIOR ORDERING INFORMATION Sample Number. MPWR-65S-100-120V MP WR I I Lamp Type 65 MP=Pulse Start Metal Halide MH=Metal Halide+ HP=High Pressure Sodium Series WR' Warrior Notes 250 Distribution 65=6H x 5V Beam Spread S—Slipfitter T=Trunnion y: Yoke SELECT ONE RABXX OR SABXX Lamp Wattage ME 100=100W 150=150W 200=200W (250=2S0W 1 320' 320W 350' 350W 400' 400W MH . 175: 175W' 250'250W+ 400' 400W+ 250/400' 250/400W1 . (Wired 250) HP 100' 100W 150' 150W 250+ 250W 400' 400W Voltage 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 4 480V MT TT 4 5T ° 7 Metal Halide available in non -U -S- markets only_ 2 Medium -base socket for Metal Halide 150W and lower. 3 Products also available in non -US voltages and 50HZ for international markets. 4 88% efficient EISA Compliant fixtures not available in 347V or TT Voltages. 5 5T available in 400W MH only. 6 Must be listed in the order shown and separated by a dash. 7 Class 1 Division 2 rating. Not available with NEMA PHOTOCONTROL, fusing or Quartz option, Slipfitter only. LAMP TYPE WATTAGE MT=Multi-Tap 120/208/240,277V (wired 277V) Pulse Start Metal Halide (MP) 100, 150, 200, 250, 320, 350, 400W Metal Halide (MH) 175, 250, 400, 250/400W High Pressure Sodium (HP) 100, 150, 250, 400W STOCK SAMPLE NUMBER (Lamp Included) Options " HAZ=Hazardous Location (Class 17 Division 2 rating) F7=Single Fuse (120, 277 or 347V only) F2=Double Fuse (208, 240 or 480V only) Q' Quartz Restrike (Hot Strike Only) EM' Quartz Restrike with "Delay Relay" (Quartz lamp strikes at both hot and cold starts) EM/SC' Emer•enc Separate Circuit PER' NEMA Twistlock Photocontrol Receptacle PC' Button Type Photocontrol C23' 3' of 12-3 Cord, Prewired (Specify Single Voltage) C42' 2' of 14-3 Cord, Prewired (Specify Single Voltage) C43' 3' of 14-3 Cord, Prewired (Specify Single Voltage) C63' 3' of 16-3 Cord, Prewired (Specify Single Voltage) J Accessories TYSXX=Trunnion or Yoke Slipfitter for 2 318', 3", or 3112 O.D. Tenon WGIWR=Wireguard VGIWR=Vandal Shield RABXX=Right Angle Pipe Bracket for Slipfitter SAB -XX' Steel Angle Bracket for Trunnion OA/RA1014' 120 -Volt Photoelectric Control OA/RA1076' Photoelectric Control, 105-285 Volt NEMA Type OA/RA1027' Photoelectric Control, 480 Volt NEMA Type PB120V' Button Type Photocontrol, Field Installed (120V only). TV/WR-XX' Top Visor VOLTAGE CHART MT=Multi-Tap 120/208/240,277V (wired 277V) TT=Triple-Tap 120/277/347V (wired 347V) 5T=5 -Tap 120/208/240/277/480V (wired 480V) SAMPLE NUMBER: XS15 Series X=Slipfitter W=Truhnion Lamp Type S=High Pressure Sodium P=Pulse Start Metal Halide Lamp Wattage 15=150W 17=175W 25=250W 32=320W 40=400W NOTES: Options not available with stock products. Order Accessories as separate items for field installation. Refer to standard ordering information to add options and accessories. 320W available in MP only. Refer to In -Stock Guide for availability. COOPER Lighting www.cooperiighting.com Specifications and Dimensions subiect to change without notice. Lumark • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 ADH082294 01/18/2009 11:45:37 AM PHOTOMETRICS 5 4 3 .2 MPWR-65S-250 250—Watt MP 22,000—Lumen Clear Lamp 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 MPWR-65S-400 400—Watt MP 42,000—Lumen Clear Lamp 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 (DOPER Lighting www.cooperlighting.com 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 4 5 4 3 2 MPWR-65S-320 320—Watt MP 30,000—Lumen Clear Lamp 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 HPWR-65S-400 400—Watt HP 50,000—Lumen Clear Lamp 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 3 4 Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. Mounting Footcandle Values for Height Isofootcandle Lines A B C D E 20' 4.50 2.25 1.13 0.56 0.23 25' 2.88 1.44 0.72 0.36 0.14 30' 2.00 1.00 0.50 020 0.10 Footcandle Table Select mounting height and read across for footcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Distance in units of mounting height. Mounting Footcandle Values for Height Isofootcandle Lines .A B C D E 20' 4.50 2.25 1.13 0.56 0.23 25' 2.88 1.44 0.72 0.36 0.14 30' 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.10 Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Lumark • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 ADH082294 01/18/2009 11:45:37 AM COOPER LIGHTING - LUMARK® NIGHTHAWK ACCESSORIES SV1/NK-XX Side Visor Each kit contains one visor only TV/NK-XX Top/bottom Visor TV/NK-XX Top/bottom Visor VS/NK Vandal Shield VS/NK/1000 Vandal Shield for 1000W Units SV/NK-XX Double Side Visor WARRIOR ACCESSORIES Two Side Visors and Top Visor Shown Two Side Visors, Top and Bottom Visor Shown TV/WR-XX Top Visor COOPER LIGHTING WG/WR-XX Wire Guard VG/WR-XX Vandal Guard WG/NK-XX Wire Guard COOPER LIGHTING - LUMARK® FLOODLIGHTING ACCESSORIES 3 1/2" (89mm) • T• ( 5.. (127mm) 6 3/8" (162mm) 1 • 2.. -��) (51mm) •_ 2 7/8 _• (73mm) TKS Slipfitter Adapter (Fits 2 3/8" O.D. Tennon) SPK=Landscape Post NKS Slipfitter for 2 3/8' O.D. Tenon 1 1/2" (38mm) 3" (76mm) • • �' 7. ti• 17' 1432mm) C. 12 1/2" 1318mm) • SAB Steel Angle Bracket for trunnion S2C2WP (EPA .9) Two -in-line crossarm 203mm) RAB Right Angle Pipe Bracket (2 5/8" O.D.( for slipfitter S3C3WP (EPA 3.6) r� c RBC Outlet Box Cover (1/2" Entry) S4C4WP (EPA 4.5) Three -in-line crossarm Four -in-line crossarm COOPER LIGHTING