Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit PL10-039 - I-FLY / FEY DAVID - SEPA AND DESIGN REVIEW
-FLY SKYDIVING 301 TUKWILA PKWY PL1 0-039 E10-018 Li 0-045 SEPA & DESIGN REVIEW City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director December 10, 2010 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: David Fey, Applicant BETA HOLDINGS LTD, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L10-045 Applicant: David Fey, Jensen Fey Architects Type of Permit Applied for: Major Modification to an approved design review application. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish 4100 square feet of the Annex shopping complex located at 301 Tukwila Parkway and construct a ndew, two story, 8,00 square foot building which will be utilized as an indoor sky diving operation. As part of the project the applicant proposes to do a general facelift of the entire building where the new tenant will be located. Site improvements for the project include installing a new PSE transformer, installing landscaping, restriping some of the existing parking stalls and eliminating some parking. Location: Associated Files: 301 Tukwila Pkwy Administrative Parking Determination Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) District: I1. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has issued a determination of Non - Significance of the proposed project. Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 1 of 3 H:\Developments\I-Fly\NOD Type 4 permit, Major ModiOcation.doc 12/10/2010 10:42:110 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 o Tukwila, Washington 98188 o Phone: 206-431-3670 o Fax: 206-431-3665 Decision on Substantive Permit: The City's Board of Architectural Review has determined that the application for a Public Hearing Design Review does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building "B" shall be painted to match the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shall approve the final color scheme for building "B" prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A. 2. The existing freestanding sign shall be painted to match the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shall approve the final color scheme for the sign prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A". Any future freestanding signs proposed on the property must have a design and color scheme that is consistent with the design and color scheme of the buildings on the site. 3. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. 4. The applicant shall amend the landscaping plan sheet L1.0 of 3 and replace the three strawberry trees located near the main entrances of the I -Fly addition with a more appropriate shrub plan that is consistent with the overall design of the landscape area. The modified landscaping plan shall be approved by the DCD Director prior to the issuance of the building permit for the proposed project. 5. Upon issuance of a building permit for the work covered under this Notice of Decision, the Notice of Decision issued by the City on September 3, 2010 for L10-045 shall be null and void. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the City Council of the Board of Architectural Review Decision is permitted. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by September 17, 2010. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Codel8.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 2 of 3 H:\Developments\1-Fly\NOD Type 4 permit, Major Modification.doc 12/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee based on current land use fee schedule. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS The City Council hearing regarding the appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The City Council decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the City Council decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the City Council decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 for further information. Pro. •• owners aff cted by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. he Kin_ sor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Brando Miles, Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUI'1 BM Page 3 of 3 1-1:\Developments\I-Fly\NOD Type 4 permit, Major Modification.doc 12/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 1111 &V of J u:F'uuiea 0 Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: x Notice of Decision Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance 85 Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 10 day of _December in the year 2010 David Fey, 7730 Leary Way, Redmond WA Beta Holdings, 18827 Bothell Way NE, Bothell WA Project Name: I -Fly Project Number: PL10-039, L10-045 WA bEPT OF ECOLOGY SEPA REVIEW SECTION PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7703 1 K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ACCOUNTING DIVISION 500 4TH AVE - RM 709A SEATTLE, WA 98104 Mailing requested by: Brandon Mailer's si nature: AIII W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City o4ukwila • Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: ht tp: //www c i. to kwil a. wa. us DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E10-018 Applied: 09/29/2010 Issue Date: 12/02/2010 Status: APPROVED Applicant: I -FLY Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: I -Fly, an indoor skydiving operation, is proposing to construct a16,000 square foot (8,000 square foot usable space) indoor sky diving facility at 301 Tukwila Parkway. As part of the project, portions of an existing commercial building will be demolished and approximately 2,100 cubic yards of fill material will be removed to construct the foundation of the proposed tower. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: 301 TUKWILA PY TUKW 0223000010 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under the option DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period. Jack P espy' ib - Official City o `' kwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNSOP-8/07 E10-018 Printed: 12-01-2010 To: From: Date: Re: MEMORANDUM Jack Pace, Director Brandon Miles, Senior Planner November 30, 2010 I -Fly Construction (E10-018) Project Description: I -Fly, an indoor skydiving operation, is proposing to construct a16,000 square foot (8,000 square foot usable space) indoor sky diving facility at 301 Tukwila Parkway. As part of the project, portions of an existing commercial building will be demolished and approximately 2,100 cubic yards of fill material will be removed to construct the foundation of the proposed tower. Agencies with Jurisdiction: City of Tukwila Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Protection Agency Notification: On October 5, 2010 a Notice of Application was mailed to tenants and property owners within 500 feet of the project. A Notice of Application was also posted on the site. Other Required Permits: The following permits are or may be required for the proposed project: Major Modification, Design Review Parking Determination Public Works Permit Building Permit Demolition Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit Plumbing Permit Sign Permit Dewatering Permit City of Tukwila City of Tukwila City of Tukwila City of Tukwila City of Tukwila City of Tukwila City of Tukwila City of Tukwila City of Tukwila US Environmental Protection Agency Brandon Miles Page 1 H:\Developments\I-Fly\SEPA\sepa-staffrpt.doc 12/01/2010 Documents Adopted by Reference: • Geotechnical Engineering Study by Pan GEO, dated December 23, 2010 • Temporary Shoring Design Recommendations by Pan GEO dated August 31, 2010 Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth I -Fly is proposing to construct a 16,000 square foot (8,000 square foot usable) indoor skydiving operation as an addition to an existing commercial complex in the City's Urban Center. As part of the construction, a 72 feet by 112 foot wide foundation will be constructed. The main element of the sky diving operation is the construction of a wind turbine tower. The tower will extend 70 feet in the air. In order to provide proper support for the wind -tower, the structure will be extended 13 to 14 feet below the existing grade of the site. The proposed foundation will require the excavation of a 15 foot deep construction pit. According to the SEPA checklist the site contains 17 to 18 feet of fill over alluvial deposits. The proposed excavation outlined above will be limited to the fill material; native soils are not proposed to be disturbed. The site is generally flat and there are no steep slopes on or near the project site. Approximately 2100 cubic yards of fill material will be cut as part of the project. All fill material will be disposed of at an approved facility. Temporary erosion control measures will be in place during construction in order to reduce potential run-off. Approximately 85 percent of the project sit is already impervious surface. The project is working within the confines of an existing commercial building. No new impervious surface is proposed with the project. •Air Concur with checklist. The only impacts will be during construction. Best management practices will be implemented during construction activities to reduce and control dust and air emissions. • Water The Duwamish River is located over 950 feet from the project site and thus the project is not subject to a Shoreline Permit. Additionally, the site has not been identified as part of a floodway or floodplain. The Geotechnical Report, listed above, notes that ground water maybe encountered at a depth of approximately 15 feet below grade. It is possible that groundwater will be encountered during construction of the foundation of the proposed I -Fly tenant space. During construction the applicant has projected that dewatering of the excavation hole of 15 gallons per minute will need to be B. Miles 2 H:\Developments\I-Fly\SEPA\sepa-staffrpt. doc • • provided. The City's Public Works Department has indicated that a dewatering permit will be required by the US Environmental Protection Agency. No waste materials will be discharged into ground waters. Surface water runoff includes the runoff from the existing buildings, new building additional and parking lot area. The project is subject to the City Stormwater requirements. • Plants Concur with checklist. • Animals Concur with checklist. Contrary to the SEPA Checklist, the project area is located within a migration area. The entire region is part of the Pacific Flyway, a primary corridor for bird species. The Duwamish River, located nearby, is home to salmon and other migrating fish species. • Energy/Natural Resources Concur with checklist. • Environmental Health Concur with checklist. Most of the noise from the project will be short term and will be associated with heavy construction equipment. Land/Shoreline Use The project site is zoned Tukwila Urban Center. The project site is located in the heart of the City. The project site sits at the southeast corner of Tukwila Pkwy and Andover Park West. Located on the west side of Andover Park West is Westfield Southcenter; located to the south is the Acme Site which includes a variety of commercial tenants including the Acme Bowling Alley; LA Fitness and California Pizza Kitchen; located to the east of the property is a Lowe's Store; and located to the north of the site is Interstate 405. Portions of the existing commercial building on the site will be demolished and replaced with a new, two story addition. The site is not located along a shoreline of statewide significance; however the Duwamish River is located less than1000 feet away from the project site. • Housing N/A, Concur with checklist. • Aesthetics The project is subject to design review approval by the City of Tukwila. B. Miles 3 H: \Developments\I-Fly\ SEPA\sepa-staffrpt.doc • • • Light and Glare Concur with checklist • Recreation Some of the nearby recreation uses include, Westfield Southcenter, LA Fitness, Acme Bowl, and the Green River Trail. The proposed use, an indoor sky diving operation, adds a new recreation use within the City's Urban Center. • Historic and Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks exist within the project area. Since the project will likely not disturb native soils it is unlikely that sites of archaeological significance will be encountered; however if during construction if any landmarks or evident of historical, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance are found on the site, work will stop immediately and the contractor will notify the City of Tukwila, Washington State Office of Archeology, and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. • Transportation Concur with checklist. B. Miles 4 H : \Deve l opments\I-Fly\SE PA\sepa-staffrpt. doc • Public Services Concur with checklist. • Utilities Concur with checklist Comments No comments were received during the Notice of Application period for the SEPA application. Recommendation: Determination of Non -Significance. The optional DNS process should be used. B. Miles 5 H: \Deve lopments\I-Fly\SEPA\sepa-staffrpt. doc • C.it* of Jaftwiea • Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing X Determination of Non -Significance Mailing requested by: Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's signature: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 3 day of December in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: I-Fly Project Number: PL10-039, E10-018 Mailing requested by: Brandon Mil Mailer's signature: fir ► 0 fi PliC}r W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC • AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services K( ept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division Dept of Ecology, SEPA ) ffice of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( ) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits. SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist • Gity of Tukwila • Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director CHAIR, BILL ARTHUR; VICE -CHAIR, MARGARET BRATCHER; COMMISSIONERS, GEORGE MALINA, LYNN PETERSON, BROOKE ALFORD, THOMAS MCLEOD, AND LOUISE STRANDER BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 9, 2010 - 6:30 PM TUKWILA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER II. ATTENDANCE III. ADOPTION OF 11-18-10 MINUTES IV. CASE NUMBER: L10-045 APPLICANT: David Fey for I -Fly REQUEST: I -Fly is proposing a major modification to an approved design review application. In August, the City of Tukwila's Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approved with conditions, the construction of indoor sky diving tower. The tower had been proposed to be located in the middle of the existing building on the site. The applicant is now proposing to relocate the tower to the east end of the building. Given the significance of the proposed change, staff has determined that the BAR needs to approve the proposed relocation of the tower and other associated site improvements. LOCATION: 301 Tukwila Parkway V. Training on efficient meeting procedures Carol Etgen, Bremerton City Clerk Director's report Adjourn 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 ity Qf / Jim Haggerton, Mayor epartment of Community Development Jack Pace, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BAR) HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: Prepared November 29, 2010 December 9, 2010 The Original Notice of Application was distributed to adjacent property owners and tenants and local agencies on August 6, 2010. A revised Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing for the first public hearing was distributed to adjacent property owners, adjacent tenants and posted on site on August 12, 2010. Notice was also published in the Seattle Times on August 12, 2010. Notice of Hearing on the major modification application was distributed to adjacent property owners, adjacent tenants and posted on site on November 24, 2010. Notification was also published in the Seattle Times on November 24, 2010. L10-045 Parking Determination David Fey, Jensen Fey Architects Major modification to an approved design review application. The applicant requests to relocate the proposed indoor sky diving operation to a different piece of the subject property. 301 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Originally was SEPA exempt, but due to the amount of excavation required a SEPA Determination was issued on December 2, 2010. Approval with Conditions Brandon Miles, Senior Planner A. Design Review Submittal B. Applicant's Response to Design Review Narrative BM Page 1 of 12 W:\Review File\lOrandom Final Staff Report, 2010.1 1.2t).doc 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 o Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 SUMMARY On August 26, 2010, following a public hearing, the BAR approved design review application L10-045 for the construction of an indoor sky diving operation at 301 Tukwila Parkway. The specific request, as outlined in the Staff Report dated August 17, 2010, was "[C]onstruction of a two story, 8,000 square foot indoor skydiving operation, proposed building improvements, and associated site modifications". Following the issuance of the Notice of Decision, the applicant informed the City that they wished to relocate the indoor sky diving operation from the center to the east end of the building'. Given that the BAR approved the design of the sky diving tower at a specific location on the property and approved a specific site plan, a proposal to relocate the tower element and significantly alter the site plan requires the review of the BAR. A major modification request is reviewed by the BAR independently from the originally approved design. Essentially, the BAR needs to consider the major modification to be a new design review application and evaluate it on its own merits. FINDINGS Vicinity/Site Information A. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish 4,100 square feet of the Annex shopping complex located at 301 Tukwila Parkway and construct a new, two story, 8,000 usable square foot building which will be utilized as an indoor sky diving operation. As part of the project the applicant proposes to do a general facelift of the entire building where the new tenant will be located. Site improvements for the project include installing a new Puget Sound Energy (PSE) transformer, installing landscaping, restriping some of the existing parking stalls and eliminating some parking stalls. B. Existing Development: The project will be located on a 3.24 acre site that is located at the southeast corner of Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West (See Sheet 1, Attachment A). The project site is already developed with two commercial buildings (See Sheet 2 and 3, Attachment A). Building A, located along Tukwila Parkway is the largest of the two buildings with a gross floor area of 39,760 square feet; building B is located perpendicular to Andover Park West and has a gross floor area of 8,417. Uses in the existing buildings include a restaurant, various retail operations, and offices. There are 165 parking stalls currently located on the site. Landscaping, both perimeter and parking lot, is provided on the site. This landscaping consists of mature trees, shrubs and grass. There are no trees located along Andover Park West. Public sidewalks are located along both Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West. A small, private concrete sidewalk extends around most of building "A" on the project site. 1 The applicant has noted in their narrative why they wish to modify their approved application. While this information is informative and provides context to the project, their reasons are not relevant to the City's review. BM Page 2 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc C. Surrounding Land Use: The project site is located in the heart of the City's Urban Center. The project site sits at the southeast corner of Tukwila Pkwy and Andover Park West. Located on the west side of Andover Park West is Westfield Southcenter; located to the south is the Acme Site which includes a variety of commercial tenants including the Acme Bowling Alley; LA Fitness and California Pizza Kitchen; located to the east of the property is a Lowe's Store; and located to the north of the site is Interstate 405 (See Sheets 1 and 4, Attachment A). D. Terrain: Like most properties within the Tukwila Urban Center the subject property is flat. All of the buildings located adjacent to the project site are located at the same grade. As you move north of the project site, across 1-405, the grade begins to significantly increase up to about 50 feet above the grade of the project site. E. Vegetation: Since the site is developed, it contains a significant amount of mature landscaping, including mature trees. A healthy row of trees is located along Tukwila Parkway. These trees are a continuation of the trees found on the adjacent Lowe's property. There are no trees located within the front landscaping area along Andover Park West, instead this area contains only grass. F. Access: Vehicular access to the site can be achieved by using an access from Tukwila Parkway or from Andover Park West (See Sheet 2, Attachment A). No new access points are proposed with the proposed project. BACKGROUND SEPA Due to the amount of excavation occurring as part of the proposed project a SEPA Determination of Non -Significance was issued on December 2, 2010. Parking The applicant is proposing to locate the proposed use in an existing commercial complex which is considered a "shopping center, planned" under TMC 18.06.750. A shopping center of this size is required to have 4 stalls for every 1,000 square feet of usable floor area. Working with the applicant and the property owner, the City has conservatively estimated that the required number of stalls required for the existing uses on the site is 189 parking stalls. As noted, there are currently 165 parking stalls located on the site and thus the parking on the site is currently considered non -conforming. The applicant has proposed to eliminate six parking stalls in order to accommodate the patio area and PSE transformer. The proposed use will be adding more building square footage to the site; however staff is working with the applicant to determine the specific impacts that the proposed use will have with parking. Given the unique nature of the proposed use the applicant will be submitting for a parking determination to determine the number of parking stalls required for the indoor skydiving operation. BM Page 3 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc Noise The proposed project uses significant mechanical equipment in its daily operations. Prior to the issuance of any construction permits the applicant will have to demonstrate that the proposed operation will comply with the City's noise regulations. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BAR) CRITERIA STANDARD OF REVIEW. Design review is required for all structures in the Tukwila Urban Center zone that are larger than 1,500 square feet. The BAR shall limit its review to the criteria found in TMC 18.60. The proposed use, (recreation) is a permitted use in the TUC pursuant to TMC 18.28. In the following discussion, the BAR criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. The applicant's responses to the BAR criteria are found in Attachment B. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of Targe paved areas; C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Response: The project site is already a developed commercial property within the TUC. The applicant is proposing to demolish 4,100 square feet of building "A" and construct a new; two story addition in essentially the same footprint of the demolished building. The new foot print of building "A" is slightly larger than the existing footprint. The small foundation sidewalk located on the east elevation will be eliminated as part of the proposed project. A new PSE transformer will be located along Tukwila Parkway, north of the proposed addition. (See Sheets 2 and Sheet 15, Attachment A). The installation of this PSE transformer will require the removal of two existing parking stalls. The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing tenant space within a multi -tenant building and construct a new, two story addition. The I -Fly tenant space will be the only two story tenant space on the site. Since the terrain is flat there is no opportunity to incorporate the building design into the natural topography. The applicant is proposing no changes to building "B". Besides the removal of a few parking stalls, the impacts to the existing parking area are minimal. The existing buildings on the site divide the parking stalls into several parking areas. Since the footprint of the buildings is not changing, relocating the parking stalls is not possible. 2. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining area. A. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character; BM Page 4 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM WAReview File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. Response: In the applicant's design review narrative (Attachment B), the applicant notes that the overall design goal is to create a distinct building within the City's Urban Center. "i -Fly Indoor Skydiving will be a new landmark towering over 70 feet and will be predominantly visible from motorists on 1-405 freeway. It will be another iconic building in the Southcenter mall district adding a more vibrant character to the retail district". The proposed design of the I -Fly building addition incorporates many of the design elements from existing buildings and new building additions within the TUC that have been constructed within the last few years. The entry element on the north facade, which attempts to emulate a parachute, provides a striking entry feature, similar to the entry feature that was added on the south side of the Mall as part of mall expansion project. The proposed project has a tower element, similar to the tower element at Acme Bowl located to the south of the project site. The use of corrugated siding is reflective of a building materials utilized at the new Bank of America and Fidelity Investments buildings located along Strander Blvd (See page 4, Attachment A). 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Response: The existing site is flat and featureless, thus there are no topographical features to incorporate in the site design. BM Page 5 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc Landscaping Since the site is developed it already contains a significant amount of mature landscaping. Eight, mature Ash trees are located along Tukwila Parkway. These trees, together with the Ash trees on the Lowe's property create a uniform street presence along Tukwila Parkway. A small number of trees are present along the south and east property lines. No existing trees on the site are proposed to be removed as part of this project. There is no side or rear perimeter landscaping requirement in the TUC zone. The landscaping strip along Andover Park West only includes grass and does not meet the City's landscaping requirements. The applicant has proposed to install cherry trees along Andover Park West in order to bring the landscaping up to code2. Shrubs are proposed to be used to screen the PSE Transformer. The applicant is also intending to use building foundation landscaping on the north wall. This landscaping will include trees and shrubs (See Sheet 2 and 15 of Attachment A). Existing Landscaping Along Andover Park West Existing Trees along Tukwila Parkway Lighting No new parking lot lighting is proposed for the project. As noted in section 2 of this staff report, the tower element of the building is required to meet the function of the proposed use (indoor skydiving) and the applicant is attempting to create a building that has a distinct appearance in order to promote itself to potential users. To help accomplish this goal lighting is being incorporated into the design of the tower element (See Sheet 9, Attachment A). Bi-directional lights are used on the south elevation to shine on the tower element during the night time which will make the building standout from the surrounding tenants and from some of the neighboring buildings. Up lighting is proposed on the entry feature. This lighting will shine onto the tower which will assist in making the tower element standout to passers by. Miscellaneous A new PSE transformer is proposed to be installed along Tukwila Parkway and the applicant has proposed to use landscaping to screen the transformer. 4. Building Design. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; 2 TMC 19.70.090 (B) requires that when a project triggers design review that the landscaping be brought up to code. BM Page 6 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportion and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; D. Colors should be harmonious with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest; Response: The applicant's design review narrative, included as Attachment B in your packet, notes the current condition of the buildings on the property: "The existing single story structure ("The Annex at Southcenter') was constructed in 1962 as an industrial/warehouse building using economical building elements, and was later converted to retail use by adding storefront glazing and canopies. The building is showing its age and its existing design characteristic is apart from the newly designed surroundings. The proposed project will include an upgrade to the remainder of the existing building". Building Design As noted, the site contains two buildings: 1. Building "A" is the main building and has a square footage of approximately 39,000 square feet. Building "A" is the proposed location of the I -Fly operation. 2. Building "B is a smaller building and has a total square footage just over 8,400 square feet. Both buildings include a mixture of tenants that include retail, office, and restaurants. The applicant has proposed significant building improvements to building "A". No improvements are proposed to building "B". As mentioned, the applicant is proposing to demolish the end unit section of building "A" and construct a new 8,000 usage square foot tower which will anchor the east elevation of the building. Work on building "A" also includes upgrades to the finishes of the entire building in order to tie the tower element to the entire building. The building work can be broken down into four elements: 1. The tower element; 2. South Elevation; BM Page 7 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc 3. North Elevation; 4. Fire Tower; and 5. Secondary building improvements. Tower Element The tower element will be approximately 70 feet tall and will have two Targe openings. While these openings are intended for the actual operation of the indoor skydiving operation, their presence also assists in reducing the mass of the tower element. The exterior siding for the tower will be "cool red" metal corrugated siding. A metal trim will be used along the tower element building edges. Two large air intake/outtake vents are located on both the north and south elevations. Due to operation needs the proposed vents will be flat and will not have a corrugated siding consistent the building. The color of the two vents matches the color of the corrugated siding ("cool red"). The bottom of the tower element is fully exposed on the east and south elevations (See Sheet 10 and 11, Attachment A). The bottom of the tower element is only partially exposed on the north elevation. The tower element is built into the west elevation and the bottom element of the tower is not visible. The east elevation is fully exposed. As shown on Sheet 11 of Attachment A, the applicant has broken down the east elevation into functional and non-function elements. The tower element, needed to provide the wind to power the indoor skydiving operation, extends over a smaller "retail" like environment. The actual tower element on the east elevation utilizes the same "cool red" corrugated siding found on the finishes on all sides of the tower element. However, the smaller retail portion of the building located below the tower utilizes a darker "matte black" color in order to distinguish itself from the massive tower element above it. The east elevation also provides a level of transparency not found on the other three building elevations. Windows are used throughout the "retail" portion of the elevation to again further distinguish this portion of the elevation from the mechanical (wind turbine) part of the elevation. As noted, the south elevation is fully exposed. The tower element on this elevation consists of just the corrugated "cool red" metal siding and vents. New trees are proposed to break up the overall mass and height of the tower element on the south elevation. Proposed tree species include, Japanese Maple and Flowering Cherry (See Sheets 10 and 14). Bi-directional lighting is used on the south elevation as a means to provide visual interest. The full tower element is partially exposed on the north elevation. In order to break down the overall height and mass of the tower a retail front with doors and canopies has been provided. Additional discussion on the north elevation is found later in this section of the staff report. The west elevation of the tower rises out of "building A" on the site. From this elevation all that is visible are the two open sections of the tower and the "cool" red corrugated siding and the roof element. To help further reduce the size of the tower from the west elevation a CMU wall is being constructed at the edge of the tenant suite for I -Fly. This CMU wall extends above the existing roof elevation of building "A" approximately 12 feet (See Sheets 10 and 13, Attachment A). BM Page 8 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM WAReview File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc The applicant is proposing two flush mounted wall signs on the tower element. One of the signs will be placed on the north elevation and will face towards 1-405. The second sign will be placed on the west elevation and will face towards the Mall. South Elevation The south elevation will be the main entrance to the proposed I -Fly tenant space. The public entry to I -Fly is located on this elevation. As shown on Sheet 10 of Attachment A, a large entry feature is located to the west of the tower element. The entry feature includes doors and a storefront element which makes it easily recognizable to patrons that this is the entrance. Also, an arched entry canopy is provided at the entrance (See Sheet 10, Attachment A). In the applicant's design review narrative, included as Attachment B, the applicant notes that the arched canopy is designed to have the appearance of a deployed parachute. The fire tower is also slightly visible from the south facade. A discussion on the fire tower is provided later in this staff report. North Elevation A store front is provided on the north elevation for appearance sake; however the north elevation will only provide emergency and service entrance to the I -Fly tenant space. The store front extends out from the tower element which is located behind. Three emergency exit doors are provided below a canopy structure. The fire tower is also fully visible from the north elevation. The primary exterior finish on the north elevation is the corrugated siding. The colors of the corrugated on the north elevation include the "cool red", "matte black" and "weathered "copper" (See Sheet 11, Attachment A). Fire Tower Located on the north elevation is a 31 foot tall fire tower (See Sheets 7, 8, and 11, Attachment A). The purpose of the fire tower is to provide emergency access to parts of the roof of the proposed I -Fly tenant space. The fire tower is visible from both the north and south elevations; however the fire tower is obscured from view by the main I -Fly tower and CMU wall which is being constructed along the west elevation of the I -Fly tenant space. The finish of the fire tower will be the "weathered copper" corrugated metal siding. Secondary Building improvements In order to blend the tower into the existing building the applicant has proposed to do a face lift to the existing building. This work includes: 1. Repainting the existing metal canopy to match the colors of the tower element; 2. Adding new decorative metal tension rods which will be welded to the existing canopy; 3. Installing "cool red" corrugated metal to match the corrugated metal used on the tower element; 4. Large planters are also used in various parts of the project to break up large blank walls (See Sheet 7, Attachment A) Lighting The goal of the lighting on the building addition is to help distinguish the proposed tower element from surrounding buildings. The applicant is proving a wide range of lighting as part of the project which includes lighting on the tower, lighting on the surrounding commercial building which is aimed at the tower and lighting as part of the main entrance. The proposed lighting will BM Page 9 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc make the addition clearly distinguishable at night. One possible concern with the lighting could be safety and the possibility of creation of "blind spots" on the property. Mechanical Equipment No outdoor building mounted mechanical equipment is proposed with the project. The existing rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be retained with no additional screening. 5. Miscellaneous structures and Street Furniture. A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape; B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Response: While not required by Code, the applicant is proposing to install a patio area at the main entrance on the south elevation. The patio will be slightly raised about the surrounding parking lot and two benches are proposed to be installed. The installation of this patio will require the removal of several parking stalls. The applicant is proposing two flush mounted building signs. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing freestanding sign on the property. The existing freestanding sign has colors which are consistent with the current colors of the buildings on the site. The building mounted signs for the existing tenants will be removed and reinstalled as part of this project. :,.i t �._ t n E. Existing Freestanding Sign CONCLUSIONS 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: The applicant is proposing to add a tower element to an existing commercial building. The proposed nature of the work (utilizing an existing building) limits options of siting the proposed addition so that it has a better fit on the project site. The applicant has attempted to make the new building addition consistent with the existing building by proposing a facelift for building "A". BM Page 10 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc Once completed building "A" will not be consistent with the colors or design of building "B" on the site. This will make both buildings significantly standout from one another. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adioininq Area: The applicant is attempting to create a new, distinct building element within the Urban Center. As shown on sheet 4 of Attachment A, the use of tower elements is becoming common place within the Urban Center. Recently the Mall, LA Fitness, and Acme Bowl included tower elements in their building designs. The goal of these tower elements is to draw people to their intended destination. The use of the tower element at this location is somewhat out of scale when compared to the other buildings in the area; however this is unavoidable given the proposed use. The tower for l -Fly is required to meet the function of the proposed skydiving use, the applicant has attempted to off set the scale of the tower element by using a false store front, canopies, incorporate building articulation and using various colors. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: All existing landscaping is proposed to be retained on the site. A small amount of landscaping is proposed around the PSE transformer located along Tukwila Parkway. Planters are also proposed to be installed around the perimeter of the building in certain locations. As noted, the landscaping along Andover Park West does not meet the City's minimum standards. Under TMC 18.70.090 a site must come into conformance with the City landscaping standards when a project triggers design review. The applicant has addressed this code requirement by incorporating cherry trees along Andover Park West. 4. Building Design: The project is unique in that essentially a new building is being constructed as an addition to an existing building. The proposed [-Fly building takes into account its setting and together with the proposed upgrades to building "A" create an overall architecturally consistent building on the site. While the tower element will be noticeable and will standout from the rest of building "A" and from building "B"; it will act as a focal point in an otherwise single story building. The tower element is needed to accommodate the function of the proposed use. The architectural design and details of the tower element create visual interest in an otherwise single story complex. As noted the applicant is not proposing any building modifications to building "B". The buildings on the site currently have architectural elements and colors that tie the two structures together. This is going to be lost if the project is completed as presented. A condition to require some changes to building "B" in order for it to tie into the new design of building "A" is recommended below. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: The proposed patio area highlights the main entry feature for the proposed l -Fly tenant space. The space provides the needed space and amenities to meet the needs of the various types of people who may utilize l -Fly and the surrounding commercial tenants. The existing sign on the property will not be consistent with the proposed design for building "A". The sign has a color and finishes that are consistent with the current design of the building. BM Page 11 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:\Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc When the project is completed, the sign will be noticeably different than the rest of the development site. A condition has been recommended to address this item. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the design for the l -Fly building and the landscaping plans with the following conditions: 1. Building "B" shall be painted to match the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shall approve the final color scheme for building "B" prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A. 2. The existing freestanding sign shall be painted to reflect the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shall approve the final color scheme for the sign prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A". Any future freestanding signs proposed on the property must have a design and color scheme that is consistent with the design and color scheme of the buildings on the site. 3. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. BM Page 12 of 12 12/01/2010 5:03:00 PM W:'Review File\Brandon\Final Staff Report, 2010.11.29.doc ea* Department Of Community AFFIDAVIT of Jala i.&a IP Development OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: X Notice of Decision Determination of Non -Significance Project Name: i -Fly, David Fey Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: L10-045 Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailing requested by: Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _3rd day of September in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: i -Fly, David Fey Project Number: L10-045 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: (Vi/(0..)-t.... W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION TO: David Fey, Applicant BETA HOLDINGS LTD, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology September 3, 2010 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT IN FORMATION Project File Number: L10-045 Applicant: David Fey, Jensen Fey Architects Type of Permit Applied for: Public Hearing Design Review Project Description: BAR approval for the construction of a two story, 8,000 square foot indoor skydiving operation, proposed building improvements, and associated site modifications. Location: Associated Files: 301 Tukwila Pkwy Administrative Parking Variance Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) District: II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City's Board of Architectural Review has determined that the application for a Public Hearing Design Review does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report, subject to the following conditions: Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 1 . ,f 3 119/01/2010 10:23:00 AM 1-I:\Developments\I-Fly\NOD Type 4 permit.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 o Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206-431-3670 o Fax: 206-431-3665 1. The applicant shall install Yoshino Flower Cherry trees along Andover Park West. The tree spacing shall match the spacing of the Ash trees located on the property along Tukwila Parkway. The Director shall approve the final planting plan prior to issuance of the building permit. 2. Building "B" shall be painted to match the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shallapprovethe final color scheme for building "B" prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A. 3. The existing freestanding sign shall be painted to match the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shall approve the final color scheme for the sign prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A". Any future freestanding signs proposed on the property must have a design and color scheme that is consistent with the design and color scheme of the buildings on the site. 4. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. 5. The following condition shall only apply to future building mounted signs that may be proposed on Building "A". This condition shall not take effect until final approval of the proposed I -Fly tenant space and improvements to Building "A". All future signage, both building mounted and freestanding, shall have a design that is consistent with this approved design review application and shall require the approval of the Director before issuance of any sign permits. 6. The applicant shall utilize the bi-directional light fixtures shown on p.12 of Attachment A. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the City Council of the Board of Architectural Review Decision is permitted. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by September 17, 2010. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: I . The name of the appealing party. Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 2 of 3 01)/01/2010 10:23:00 AM 1-1:\Developments\1-Fly\NOD Type 4 permit.doc 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee based on current land use fee schedule. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS The City Council hearing regarding the appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The City Council decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the City Council decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the City Council decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 for further information. Property owner Contact the Ki ed by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. ounty Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. n Miles, enior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 3 of 3 09/01/2010 10:23:00 AM H:\Developments\I-Fly\NOD Type 4 permit.doc September 11, 2012 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Via Certified and Regular Mail Bill Adams I -Fly Seattle 7150 West Erie Street Chandler, AZ 85226 RE: I -Fly Seattle Design Review and Building Permits Final Notice Dear Mr. Adams: Lt 0-'361 In December of 2010, the City of Tukwila's Board of Architectural of Review (BAR) approved the construction of the I -Fly building addition at 301 Tukwila Parkway (File L10-045). As part of the BAR review, I -Fly prepared detailed building renderings depicting the design of the I -Fly building addition and exterior finishes that were to be completed to the entire building. Construction of I -Fly commenced in the winter of 2011. As the project began to near completion, you requested that the City allow I -Fly to open prior to completion of the exterior finishes. In order to assist a new business in the City, the City obliged, with the express understanding that you would complete the work by the end of the year (2011). The work was not completed as contemplated. In a letter dated December 9, 2011, the City reminded you of the need to complete the work by the end of 2011. You requested that the work be permitted to be performed in good weather; again, the City accommodated the needs of your business and allowed you to have until the end of July 2012 to complete the work that was required. We have again come to a deadline and I -Fly has not fulfilled its promises to the City. I -Fly is currently operating without a valid Certificate of Occupancy and the temporary Certificate of Occupancy has expired. It is illegal for a business to operate without a valid certificate of occupancy. In addition, not having a certificate of occupancy is ground for revocation of your business license. I -Fly must obtain a permanent certificate of occupancy in order to remain open. In order to obtain a permanent certificate of occupancy, I -Fly needs to finalize all outstanding issues for building permits D10-295 and D10- 296. These permits have expired and will need to be reactivated. You were provided notice of this action on January 3, 2012. Please note that D10-296 cannot be finalized until you have completed the building exterior work that was approved by the BAR. Included with this letter are the plans that were approved by the BAR. As you can see, many of the details that are included in these plans have not been completed. For example, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 • The exterior building planters on the north side have not been installed; and • A grey accent color was to be painted around the top edge of the roof line. A site inspection showed that the entire roof line is painted red. This deviation was not approved by the City and The list provided above is not meant to be a complete list of what needs to be completed, but is only a representative sample of the remaining work. The building on site needs to match what was approved by the City's BAR, which is depicted in the plans provided. The City is now going to begin proceedings to close I -Fly until a certificate of occupancy has been obtained. In order to avoid having to close temporarily, the City has laid out a specific compliance schedule below. Compliance Schedule 1. September 18, 2012, reactivate permits D10-295, D10-296 and any other expired permits. Pay any required reactivation fees. Please call the permit center at (206) 431-3670. 2. September 25, 2012, obtain final inspection on D10-295 and all other permits, except for D10-296. 3. September 27, 2012, install all exterior finishes and install all planters as shown the approved BAR plans. Call for final inspections. 4. September 28, 2012, obtain final inspections for D10-296. A meeting was scheduled to discuss these issues with you in person on Thursday, September 6, 2012; however, you did not show up as scheduled. The City hopes that I -Fly and the City can have a long and productive relationship in the future. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431-3684 or send an email to Brandon.Miles@ Tukwilawa.gov. Si Bra do Iles Senior Planner cc. I -Fly Seattle (via certified and regular mail) Shelley Kerslake, City Attorney David Fey, Jensen Fey Architects (via certified and regular mail) Files Page 2 of 2 IN000K SKYDIVING; VhKTICAL WIND TUNNEL r www.iFLYseattle.com iFLY Seattle 349 Tukwila Parkwayi Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 244-iFL 1435$Y) October 4`h, 2012 iFLY Seattle Indoor SkyDiving William P. Adams 349 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 206-979-4359 bill(a,iflyseattle.com City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Brandon Miles 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206-431-3670 Brandon.miles@tukwilawa.gov Subject: Letter of explanation for the City of Tukwila letter to iFLY Seattle dated 11 September 2012. Dear Mr. Miles, iFLY Seattle asks to comply with the compliance schedule outlined in your letter to iFLY Seattle in the following manner: 1. iFLY Seattle will re -activate the permit numbers D10-295 and D10-296 and pay the required fees. 2. iFLY Seattle will obtain final inspection on D10-295. 3. iFLY Seattle has installed the exterior finishes as per the permitted construction drawings in the colors designated on the permitted drawings. This permit set does differ from the design review artist rendering slightly and I believe this is where the misunderstanding has occurred. The only deviation to the permitted set of drawings occurs where the siding detail had to be extended over the grey color iron beam because of a water -proofing issue that could only be resolved by flashing over the grey iron beam. This waterproofing detail cost more in additional siding and was only done to ensure that the building stay watertight. I am asking the city to review and approve the detail that was doe in the field to ensure that the building did not leak. 4. In the design Review Submittal, our drawings indicated that arborvitae were to be placed in containers at the blank walls on the North side of the building. Our subsequent failed to show the placement of these trees. Had these elements been addressed by the landscape architect, he would have told us that the trees, when full grown, would block the sidewalk as it runs along the Western portion of the North side of the building. Emerald Arborvitae grow to 15 feet tall and 4 feet wide at maturity. Containers for these plants would seem to work against the urban design goals of creating a pedestrian friendly setting. The existing planters along the sidewalk at the Southside of the building currently are empty. This is because the �LiFLU INDOOR SKYDIVING INDOOR SKYDIVING / VERTICAL WIND TUNNEL www.iFLYseattle.com 4 'FLY Seattle 349 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 (246) 244-iFLY .. 143591 vegetation that used to exist has died because of lack of irrigation. The same would probably be true if trees were to be placed in containers at the North side of the building. The eastern half of the North facade does have a planting area that will accommodate the trees envisioned and iFLY Seattle would like to plant these trees in those areas. The existing ivy would be removed. Removing this ivy will also probably have the consequence of eliminating the existing rodent issue because the ivy acts as cover for rodents. iFLY Seattle is asking that the above adjustments be accommodated so that we can close the building permits and receive our permanent certificate of occupancy. I am available anytime to review these comments onsite at the phone number, email address, and physical address above. Thank You Very Much for your Time and Consideration, Bil Adams CEO iFLY Seattle �LiFLU INDOOR SKYDIVING SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ C mplete items 1, 2, and 3. Aiso complete it 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Pnt your name and address on the reverse sit, that we can return the card to you. • Attach thls card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: I -FLY SEATTLE 349 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila WA 98188 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signature KC al X B. Received by (Printed Name) ❑ Agent 0 Address C. Dat: of D.Iiv4 /, '0 D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 es If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Service Type Certified Mall 0 Express Mall ❑ Registered g Return Receipt for Merchand ❑ Insured Mall C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 7002 2410 0005 7502 3064 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.02-M-1 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Aiso complete 'r:em 4' if Festricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse • so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the maiiplece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: DAVID FEY Jensen Fey Architects 77319 Leary Way Redmond WA 98052 2. Artie (Tra, PS Fol SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Com fete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print , our name and address on the reverse so t :t we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece, or on the front if space permits. COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY gnature eceived by (Printed Name) bS C.41t arge, ° Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No ❑ AAA ❑ Add6.es: C. Date of Deily 3. Service Type Certified Mali 0 Express Mall Registered eturn Receipt for Merchanc 0 Insured Mall C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 02595.02-M-' COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ❑ Agent ❑ Ad res 1. Article Addressed to: CITY BILL ADAMS SEP 212012 I -FLY SEATTLE �d'�RMIT CENTER B. Received by ( Printed Name) ello 1 D. Is delivery address different from Item 1 If YES, enter delivery address below: Yes i► /(..��' 1(4., 9z/18 3. Service Type Certified Mall 0 Express Mall Registered Return Receipt for Mercharn 0 Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 01.01010. 7002 2410 0005 7502 3019 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M December 9, 2011 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Via Certified and Regular Mail Mr. Bill Adams I -Fly Seattle 7150 West Erie Street Chandler, AZ 85226 RE: I -Fly Seattle Design Review Completion of Project Dear Mr. Adams: In August of this year the City of Tukwila's Department of Community Development approved a temporary certificate of occupancy for the I -Fly Seattle building located at 301 Tukwila Parkway. Under the terms of the temporary certificate of occupancy, I -Fly Seattle was permitted to open while completing work approved as part of the building permit and design review. Please be advised that I -Fly will no longer be permitted to operate under a temporary certificate of occupancy, as of the end of the year. I -Fly must obtain a final Certificate of Occupancy. In order to do so all approved work under the building permit must be completed, all conditions met, and final approval by all City Departments received. As you are aware, I -Fly Seattle received design review approval for the construction of the I -Fly Seattle building in December of 2010. The approved design review application required that exterior improvements be completed to both buildings on the project site. The purpose of these exterior improvements was to blend the new I -Fly building into the site as a whole. Additionally, the freestanding sign on the property was to be painted to have colors that were consistent with the approved design review application. As of today, none of the exterior upgrades to the buildings on the site have been started, let alone completed nor has the sign been painted. All required work needs to be completed by the end of year. Businesses are not permitted to remain open if they do not possess a certificate of occupancy. Additionally, the City will not issue 2012 Business License for I -Fly until the work has been completed. Please be advised that operating a business without a business license is violation of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) and could subject I -Fly Seattle to daily fines. If the work is not completed by January 1, 2012 the City will issue a Notice and Order to compel compliance with the approved design review application. V1 No- )5r1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 The City has diligently worked with I -Fly Seattle to make this project a reality and get I -Fly Seattle through the permit process as quickly as possible. I -Fly Seattle now needs to fulfill the promises and commitments that were made to the City during the design review process. If you have any questions please contact Brandon Miles via phone at (206) 431-3684 or via email at Brandon.Miles@Tukwilawa.gov. Building Official cc. David Fey BETA Holdings (via certified and regular mail) I -Fly Seattle (via certified and regular mail) File Page 2 of 2 N Er 0' m N .11 r -i D m —0 N Mailing List Bill Adams I -Fly Seattle 7150 West Erie Street Chandler, AZ DAVID FEY 7730 LEARY WY REDMOND WA, 98052 I -Fly Seattle 349 TUKWILA PY Tukwila, WA 98188 BETA HOLDINGS LTD 18827 BOTHELL WAY NE BOTHELL WA, 98011 U.S. Postal Service it.t CERTIFIED MAIL rn RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.uUspss..ccomo Postag Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage to Sheaf, 11 pt No.; or PO Box No. Clay elik ZIP+4 BETA HOLDINGS LTD 18827 Bothell Way NE Bothell WA 98011. PS Foran 9800, Atiglint 2006 Postmark Here Sec novel ce lot In:;tn u;tions etuilr,1 -1-46c 0.7A/\ m it ra m N —0 ra 0 D D u-1 m D U.S. Postal Service tt.t CERTIFIED MStIL,t., RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.corn0 OFFICIAL. USE Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage Sent To 'Sheet, apEKio:i or PO Box No. City, State, ZIP+, Mr. Bill Adams I -Fly Seattle 7150 West Erie Street Chandler AZ 85226 :Postmark Here PS Form 9800. Atiguot 2006 See Revd se for Instnictions • • • I FLY PRESENTATION Major Modification December 9, 2010 1. Introduction Tonight the BAR is being asked to review and approve a major modification to an approved BAR application. In August the BAR approved, with conditions, an application for I -Fly to construct an indoor sky diving operation at 301 Tukwila Parkway. The applicant has requested significant changes to the approved plans, specifically relocating the tower element from the middle of the building to the east end and some site plan changes. Given the level of changes from what was approved by the BAR in August, a major modification application needs to be reviewed by the BAR. 1 will leave discussing the reasons for changes in the application to applicant. associated site modifications at 301 Tukwila Parkway. Staff recommends approval of the Before we proceed T need to go through the appearance of fairness questions. 2. Appearance of Fairness Questions 3. Review of applicable criteria The BAR needs to consider the major modification to be a NEW design review application and evaluate it on its own merits. The BAR.s review is independent of what has previously been approved. a. TMC 18.60.050 Design Review b. Landscaping c. TUC Development Standards d. Sign Code 4. Site Location a. The project site lies in the heart of the Southcenter area of the City, sitting at the SE corner of Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West, directly across the street from the old Bank of America location. b. Besides the Mall, adjacent land uses includes, Acme Bowl to the south, Lowes to the east, and I-405 from the north. c. The property has exceptional visibility from I-405 and the Southcenter area. 5. Existing Site Development • a. There are currently two buildings located on the 3.24 acre site 1. Building A, the proposed location of the I -Fly, is approximately 40.00035.000 square feet, one story and was constructed in 1962. 2. Building B, located south of building A is one story with a square footage of approximately 8,500 square feet. 3. Uses in the existing two buildings includes a mix of retail and; a restaurant, and offices. b. The site contains mature landscaping, include a nice row of ash trees along Tukwila Parkway. These trees create a uniform street precense with the trees on the Lowe's site there are not trees located along Andover Park West. This creates a significant gap in the City's tree coverage along the street. c. An existing grand monument sign is located along Andover Park West. The sign has colors and design that matches the colors of the existing buildings. 6. Proposed Development a. Site Plan 1. At the end building "A" the indoor skydiving tower will be constructed. Building location is unchanged, the footprint of build "A" will be slightly bumped out to accommodate the proposed tower. the building is essentially being dissected and a new building being constructed 2. Reduction in number of parking stalls. 23.Minor amount of new landscaping. 3.1.New PSE Transformer 7. Building Design a.The functional use of the building (wind tower) impacts the overall design of the building. The tower. at 70 feet, will be taller than the other buildings on the site. Besides just the functional needs of the proposed tower, the tower itself is intended to be part of the overall marketing of the proposed use by provide a visual iconic structure, something that DOES stick out. b:The applicant has noted that their goal is to create a "landmark" tower which will be easily visible to motorists along I-405 and the surrounding Southcenter area. The building's design attempts to bring in the design of many of the other adjacent "landmark structures. 1. The tower element is similar to the land mark towers at Acme Bowl, LA Fitness, and the mall addition. 2. The design also bring in modern finishes that are similar to LA Fitness, Acme Bowl, the Mall, B of A and Fidality. 8. The building design can be broken down into five four parts: a. Tower Element 1. The tower is the most prominent feature of the proposed I -Fly addition. The tower is located in the rear of the building, towards the Lowe's property. Located at the top of the tower are two large openings. These openings are part of the fuctional operation of the tower, but also help to reduce the overall mass of the tower structure. The tower element is fully exposed on the east elevation. To break up the mass of the tower on the elevation the tower has been broken down into two elements, the wind tower and a smaller "retail" area. 'On tower is also fully exposed on the south elevation. Trees are used to break up the mass of the tower on this elevation. On the remaining north and west elevations, the tower is built within the existing building. Pedestrain. scale is maintained, the tower element rises out of the back. The ground floor finishes have finishes that are pedestrian friendly such as the entry features. The b. South facade The south elevation is the main entrance to the i -Fly tenant space. A large entry feature is proposed and the entry feature includes a canopy that has the appearance of a deployed parachute. The south facade provide entry to the main building area which extends slightly higher than the main building: This elevation provides a step up view from the street level, going from one elevation to a higher elevation before reaching the highest elevation on the site. c. North facade A store front is provided on the north elevation for appearance sake; however this building access is not intended to be a public entrance. Fire Tower A fire tower is also provided on the north elevation. The fire tower provides emergney access to the roof d. Secondary building improvements. In order to blend the tower into the existing building, the applicant has proposed to do a face lift to the existing building. 9. Building B improvements. a. Applicant is proposing no modifications. The proposed two buildings would not be compatible with each other in the terms of design. Currently they have colors and lines that are consistent and intergrated. This is being lost in the design that is currently proposed. One of the guidelines is that buildings have a texture, and lines, and masses that is consistent. Staff reccomends that building "B" be painted to match building "A" 10. Lighting, lighting is provided to provide nighttime visual interest to the proposed. use. To aid in bringing- people to the site. 11. Landscaping, The perimeter landscaping will. be brought up to code. trigger is required when design review is triggered (TMC 18.70.090) 12. Bike racks, compliance is only required if additional parking is required. • 13. Signage, existing -sign design is consistent with the current design of the building. Will be lost under the proposed project. Staff recommends approval of the project with the conditions listed in the staff report. • CITY OF TUKWILA • NOV 2 2010 Department of Community Developmnent...1—, t 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WArrg1 8°P"""1T Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (306) 431-3665 E-mail:: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us DESIGN REVIEW MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /• Q" LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 049 PicKiklA41-t LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 022-3 ©ooO/ 0 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 2 4v'iD V ✓ Age mr Mort/ phone(0i5)2,«e 'O3! ` 51 E-mail. i / wlel./ .GQ1-Yl Address: FAX 2/ 6 • 0329 Signature: Date: / 2.2 ZOID C:\DOCUM E-1 \SCOTT--1.TUK\LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPGrpWise\Design Review- Major Mod-JAN09.doc FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P -DR Planner: File Number: Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /• Q" LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 049 PicKiklA41-t LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 022-3 ©ooO/ 0 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 2 4v'iD V ✓ Age mr Mort/ phone(0i5)2,«e 'O3! ` 51 E-mail. i / wlel./ .GQ1-Yl Address: FAX 2/ 6 • 0329 Signature: Date: / 2.2 ZOID C:\DOCUM E-1 \SCOTT--1.TUK\LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPGrpWise\Design Review- Major Mod-JAN09.doc City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONTACT: BM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BAR) Prepared August 17, 2010 August 26, 2010 Notice of Application was distributed to adjacent property owners and tenants and local agencies; on August 6, 2010. A revised Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing was distributed to adjacent property owners, adjacent tenants and posted on site on August 12, 2010. Notice was also published in the Seattle Times on August 12, 2010. L10-045 Administrative Parking Variance David Fey, Jensen Fey Architects BAR approval for the construction of a two story, 8,000 square foot indoor skydiving operation, proposed building improvements, and associated site modifications. 301 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Exempt Approval with Conditions Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Page 1 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 ATTACHMENTS: A. Design Review Submittal B. Applicant's Response to Design Review Narrative FINDINGS Vicinity/Site Information A. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish portions of the Annex shopping complex located at 301 Tukwila Parkway and construct a new, two story, 8,000 square foot building which will be utilized as an indoor sky diving operation. As part of the project the applicant proposes to do a general facelift of the entire building where the new tenant will be located. Site improvements for the project include installing a new Puget Sound Energy (PSE) transformer, installing landscaping, restriping some of the existing parking stalls and installing a plaza area near the main entrance. B. Existing Development: The project will be located on a 3.24 acre site that is located at the southeast corner of Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West (See sheet 1, Attachment A). The project site is already developed with two commercial buildings (See Sheet 3, Attachment A). Building A, located along Tukwila Parkway is the largest of the two buildings with a gross floor area of 35,000 square feet; building B is located perpendicular to Andover Park West and has a gross floor area of 8,417. Uses in the existing buildings include a restaurant, various retail operations, and offices. There are 159 parking stalls located on the site. Landscaping, both perimeter and parking lot, is provided on the site. This landscaping consists of mature trees, shrubs and grass. There are no trees located along Andover Park West. Public sidewalks are located along both Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West. C. Surrounding Land Use: The project site is located in the heart of the City's Urban Center. As noted, the project site sits at the southeast corner of Tukwila Pkwy and Andover Park West. Located on the west side of Andover Park West is Westfield Southcenter; located to the south is the Acme Site which includes a variety of commercial tenants include the Acme Bowling Alley; LA Fitness and California Pizza Kitchen; located to the east of the property is a Lowe's Store; and located to the north of the site is Interstate 405 (See sheets 1 and 4, Attachment A). D. Terrain: Like most properties within the Tukwila Urban Center the subject property is flat. All of the buildings located adjacent to the project site are located at the same grade. As you move north of the project site, across 1-405, the grade begins to significantly increase up to about 50 feet above the grade of the project site. BM Page 2 of 13 08/18/2010 5:21:00 PM H:\Developments\I-Fly\Final Staff Report, 2010.06.14.doc E. Vegetation: Since the site is developed, it contains a significant amount of mature landscaping, including mature trees. A healthy row of trees is located along Tukwila Parkway. These trees are a continuation of the trees found on the adjacent Lowe's property. There are no trees located within the front landscaping area along Andover Park West, instead this area contains only grass. . F. Access: Vehicular access to the site can be achieved by using an access from Tukwila Parkway or from Andover Park West (See sheet 2, Attachment A). No new access points are proposed with the proposed project. BACKGROUND SEPA The project is exempt from SEPA review. Parking The gross floor area of Building A and Building B is 43,400 square feet. The parking calculations are based on useable floor area. Assuming 10% of the gross building area is used for restrooms, stairs or other similar uses, then a total of 155 parking stalls are required for this complex, based on 4 parking stalls for any complex that meets the definition of a planned shopping center. The Applicant was also asked to provide detailed information regarding the parking requirements for the proposed use, including parking data from other similar facilities. Based on review of the parking data for similar uses the proposed use will require a maximum of 107 parking spaces during peak usage. Parking determination including any variances up to 10% reduction from parking standards are administrative decisions issued by the Director. Based on review of the parking information submitted by the applicant it is likely that the project meets the parking requirements of TMC or will qualify for 10% parking variance. Detailed parking review including review of usable floor area will be done as part of building permit review process and if an administrative parking decision is required it shall be issued prior to issuance of the building permit. Additionally, the Director may also place restrictions and conditions on the use of the parking to ensure that there are no offsite impacts associated with parking Noise The proposed project uses significant mechanical equipment in its daily operations. Prior to the issuance of any construction permits the applicant will have to demonstrate that the proposed operation will comply with the City's noise regulations. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BAR) CRITERIA STANDARD OF REVIEW. Design review is required for all structures in the Tukwila Urban Center zone that are larger than 1,500 square feet. The BAR shall limit its review to the criteria found in TMC 18.60. The proposed use, (recreation) is a permitted use in the TUC pursuant to TMC 18.28. BM Page 3 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc In the following discussion, the BAR criteria are shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. The applicant's responses to the BAR criteria are found in Attachment B. 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Response: The project site is already a developed commercial property within the TUC. The applicant is proposing to demolish a section of building "A" and rebuild that section with a new, two story, 8,000 square foot building. The new footprint will be unchanged from the existing footprint of the building (See Sheet 2 of Attachment A). A new PSE transformer will be located near Tukwila Parkway (See Sheets 2 and Sheet 15, Attachment A). The PSE transformer will require the removal of several parking stalls. The applicant is proposing landscaping around the PSE transformer. A small plaza area is proposed at the entrance to the new addition from the south elevation (See Sheets 2 and 15, Attachment A). The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing tenant space within a multi -tenant building and construct a new, two story addition. The I -Fly tenant space will be the only two story tenant space on the site. Since the terrain is flat there is no opportunity to incorporate the building design into the natural topography. The applicant is proposing no changes to building "B". Besides the removal of a few parking stalls, the impacts to the existing parking area are minimal. The existing buildings on the site divide the parking stalls into several parking areas. Since the footprint of the buildings is not changing, relocating the parking stalls is not possible. 2. Relationship of structure and site to adjoining area. A. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character; D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. BM Page 4 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc Response: In the applicant's design review narrative (Attachment B), the applicant notes that the overall design goal is to create a distinct building within the City's Urban Center. "i -Fly Indoor Skydiving will be a new landmark towering over 70 feet will be predominantly visible from motorist on 1-405 freeway. It will be another iconic building in the Southcenter mall district adding a more vibrant character to the retail district". The proposed design of I -Fly building incorporates many of the design elements from the existing buildings and new building additions within the TUC that have been constructed within last few years. . The entry element on thenorth facade provides a striking entry feature, similar to the entry feature that was added on the south side of the Mall as part of mall expansion project. The proposed project has a tower element, similar to the tower element at Acme Bowl located to the south of the project site. The use of corrugated siding is reflective of a building materials utilized at the new Bank of America and Fidelity Investments located along Strander Blvd (See page 4, Attachment A). 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination; G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Response: The existing site is flat and featureless, thus there are no topographical features to incorporate in the site design. Landscaping Since the site is developed it already contains a significant amount of mature landscaping. Eight, mature Ash trees are located along Tukwila Parkway. These trees, together with the Ash trees on the Lowe's property create a uniform street presence along Tukwila Parkway. A small 13M Page 5 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc number of trees are present along the south and east property lines. There is no side or rear perimeter landscaping requirement in TUC zone. The landscaping strip along Andover Park West only includes grass and does not meet the City's landscaping requirements. The applicant has not proposed to add any addition trees along Andover Park West. Existing Landscaping Along Andover Park West • Existing Trees along Tukwila Parkway The applicant is also proposing foundation landscaping along the base of the building. The foundation landscaping is proposed as above ground planters along certain portions of the building (See Sheet 2 and 15 of Attachment A). Lighting No new parking lot lighting is proposed for the project. As noted in section 2 of this staff report, the tower element of the building is required to meet the function of the building and the applicant is attempting to create a building that has a distinct appearance in order to promote itself to potential users. To help accomplish this goal lighting is being incorporated into the design of the tower element (See Sheet 9, Attachment A). Up lights are used to shine on the tower element during the night time which will make the building standout from the surrounding tenants and from some of the neighboring buildings. This lighting will likely be easily seen from BM Page 6 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc 1-405. The up lighting is located on the tower element itself and on the roofs on the surrounding tenant roof area. Miscellaneous Since this is an existing, commercial site there are no new outdoor storages areas proposed with the project. 4. Building Design. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportion and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; D. Colors should be harmonious with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest; Response: The applicant's design review narrative, included as Attachment B in your packet notes the current condition of the buildings on the property: "[the] existing single story strip mall was built in the late 1980's with economical building materials such as simple metal skeleton on "slab on grade" in -filled with bricks and stucco around storefront glazing. The building is showing its age and its existing design characteristic is apart from the newly designed surroundings" Building Design As noted, the site contains two buildings: 1. Building "A" is the main building and has a square footage of approximately 35,000 square feet. Building "A" is the proposed location of the 1 -Fly operation. 2. Building "B is a smaller building and has a total square footage just over 8,400 square feet. BM Page 7 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc Both buildings include a mixture of tenants that include retail, office, and restaurants. The applicant has proposed significant building improvements to building "A". No improvements are proposed to building "B". As mentioned, the applicant is proposing to demolish a tenant space within an existing multi -tenant building "A" and construct a new 8,000 square foot tower element in the middle of the building. Work on building "A" also includes upgrades to the finishes of the entire building in order to tie the tower element to the entire building. The building work can be broken down into four elements: 1. The tower element; 2. South facade; 3. North facade; and 4. Secondary building improvements. Tower Element The tower element will be approximately 70 feet tall and will extend over all structures on the site. Two large openings will be provided in the tower element. While these openings are intended for the actual operation of the building, their presence also assists in reducing the mass of the tower element. The exterior siding for the tower will be "cool red" metal corrugated siding. A metal trim will be used along the tower elements building edges. Two large air intake/outtake vents are located on both the north and south elevations. These vents have been blended into the design of the tower element by the use of louvers. The color of the two louvers matches the color of the corrugated siding. The bottom of the tower element is not exposed on the north elevation, but instead drops in behind the first story retail. On the south elevation the bottom of the tower element is exposed but a CMU planter is used to break up the overall size of the tower for pedestrians who are entering the tenant site. The applicant is proposing flush mounted wall signs on the tower element. One of the signs will be placed on the north elevation and will face towards 1-405. The second sign will be placed on the west elevation and will face towards the Mall. South Facade The south facade will be the main entrance to the proposed I -Fly tenant space and will include two entries. The first entry feature is the main entry into the indoor skydiving operation. Like the tower element, this entry feature will utilize corrugated metal siding. The siding will have a metallic color which will make it standout from the tower element. An arched metal canopy will be added along the south elevation to delineate the entry for the proposed use. This entry feature will also step up above the height of the existing building and have a total height of just over 33 feet. The height of this entry splits the difference in the height of the tower feature and the existing BM Page 8 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc one story building. Since this entry feature sits up above the existing building, its north and west walls will be exposed. The applicant has proposed to utilize split face CMU, with a horizontal banding on the north and west walls of the entry feature. The CMU is consistent with the CMU used for the planter on the south elevation and with the existing brick finishes on the west and east elevations. Large windows and doors will be provided at the entry feature. These windows and doors provide transparency into the tenant space. A secondary entry is also proposed along the south elevation. This entry will provide direct access into the retail component of the I -Fly operation. Again, like the tower element, corrugated metal siding is being used. The color for the corrugated metal siding for the retail entry is cool metallic copper. This helps it stand out from the tower element and the adjacent entry into the skydiving operation. This entry is also slightly higher than the existing commercial building and results in a small raised wall on the roof in between the tower and the lower single story roof on the east side. The applicant is proposing to use the same CMU finish on this wall as is done on the walls for the main entry. Like the entry into the skydiving operation, a large transparent entry element is being included. North Facade The applicant is proposing to install finishes on the north fagade that will match the finishes of the remaining retail component of building "A". The north facade will have the appearance of a one story retail building, with the tower element rising from behind. Windows and doors will be added along the north elevation and an entry into the I -Fly tenant space will also be added. The exterior finish for the north facade will include canopies and decorative tension rods. All exterior finishes will match the finishes that are being added to building "A". The signs on the building wall are not that consistent with the canopy with tension rods. Given that it is an existing building and there are existing signs for existing tenants it is not practical to get all the tenants to change their signs at this time, however as tenants change warranting change in signage, any future signs will need to be consistent with the new design of the building.. Secondary Building improvements As noted the applicant is proposing to add a new tower element in the middle of an existing commercial building. In order to blend the two buildings together, the applicant has proposed to do a face lift to the existing building. This work includes: 1. Repainting the existing metal canopy to match the colors of the tower element; 2. Adding new decorative metal tension rods which will be welded to the existing canopy; 3. Installing "cool red" corrugated metal to match the corrugated metal used on the tower element; 4. Large planters are also used in various parts of the project to break up large blank walls (See Sheet 7, Attachment A) Lighting The goal of the lighting on the building addition is to help distinguish the proposed tower element from surrounding buildings. The applicant is proving a wide range of lighting as part of BM Page 9 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc the project which includes lighting on the tower, lighting on the surrounding commercial building which is aimed at the tower and lighting as part of the main entrance. The proposed lighting will make the addition clearly distinguishable at night. One possible concern with the lighting could be safety and the possibility of creation of "blind spots" on the property. Mechanical Equipment No outdoor building mounted mechanical equipment is proposed with the project. The existing rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be retained with no additional screening. 5. Miscellaneous structures and Street Furniture. A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape; B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Response: While not required by Code, the applicant is proposing to install a patio area at the main entrance on the south elevation. The patio will be slightly raised about the surrounding parking lot and two benches are proposed to be installed. Also, proposed in the patio area are two above ground light standards and two bollards. The applicant is proposing two flush mounted building signs. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing freestanding sign on the property. The existing freestanding sign has colors that are inconsistent with the current design of the building. The signs for the existing tenants will be removed and reinstalled as part of this project. Existing Freestanding Sign BM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc Page 10 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM CONCLUSIONS 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: The applicant is proposing to add a new addition that includes a tower element in the middle of an existing commercial building. The proposed nature of the work limits options of siting the proposed structure so that it has a better fit on the project site. The applicant has attempted to make the new building addition consistent with the existing building. Once completed building "A" will not be consistent with the colors or design of building "B" on the site. This will make both building significant standout from one another. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adioininq Area: The applicant is attempting to create a new, distinct building element within the Urban Center. As shown on page 4 of Attachment A, the use of tower element is becoming common place within the Urban Center. Recently the Mall, LA Fitness, and Acme Bowl included tower elements in their building designs. The goal of these tower elements is to draw people to their intended destination. The tower for I -Fly is required to meet the function of the proposed skydiving use and the applicant while incorporating the function has also designed the tower to create an architectural focal point in an otherwise single story retail complex. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment: No major modifications to the landscaping on the project site are proposed. All existing landscaping is proposed to be retained on the site. A small amount of landscaping is proposed around the PSE transformer located along Tukwila Parkway. Planters are also proposed to be installed around the perimeter of the building in certain locations. As noted, the landscaping along Andover Park West does not meet the City's minimum standards. Under TMC 18.70.090 a site must come into conformance with the City landscaping standards when a project triggers design review. Under the City's landscaping standards Type I landscaping would be required along Andover Park West. It does not seem necessary to require full Type I landscaping along Andover Park West; however the absence of trees along this part of the property is noticeable given that all the surrounding street frontages have mature trees. It would seem prudent to require that trees be planted along Andover Park West. In order to provide a uniform street presence, the trees should have a spacing that matches the spacing for the Ash trees located on the project site along Tukwila Parkway. A condition has been added to address this issue. BM Page 11 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc 4. Building Design: The project is unique in that essentially a new building is being constructed within the confines of an existing building. The proposed I -Fly building takes into account its setting and together with the proposed upgrades to building "A" create an overall architecturally consistent building on the site. While the tower element will be noticeable and will standout from the rest of building "A" and from building "B"; it will act as a focal point in an otherwise single story building. The tower element needs to accommodate the function of the proposed use and the architectural design and details of the tower element create visual interest in an otherwise single story complex. As noted the applicant is not proposing any building modifications to building "B". The buildings on the site currently have architectural elements and colors that tie the two structures together. This is going to be lost if the project is completed as presented. It would seem prudent to require some changes to building "B" in order for it to tie into the new design of building "A". A condition as been added to address this issue. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture: The proposed patio area highlights the main entry feature for the proposed I -Fly tenant space. The space provides the needed space and amenities to meet the needs of the various types of people who may utilize I -Fly and the surrounding commercial tenants. The existing sign on the property will not be consistent with the proposed design for building "A". The sign has a color and finishes that are consistent with the current design of the building. When the project is completed, the sign will be noticeably different than the rest of the development site. A condition has been added to address this item. Installing new flush mounted signs directly onto the corrugated metal siding will conflict with the overall design that is being created as a result of this project. A condition has been added to address this item. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends approval of the design for the I -Fly building and the landscaping plans with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall install Yoshino Flower Cherry trees along Andover Park West. The tree spacing shall match the spacing of the Ash trees located on the property along Tukwila Parkway. The Director shall approve the final planting plan prior to issuance of the building permit. BM Page 12 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc 2. Building "B" shall be painted to match the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shall approve the final color scheme for building "B" prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A. 3. The existing freestanding sign shall be painted to match the color scheme of Building "A". The Director shall approve the final color scheme for the sign prior to issuance of the building permit for building "A". Any future freestanding signs proposed on the property must have a design and color scheme that is consistent with the design and color scheme of the buildings on the site. 4. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. 5. The following condition shall only apply to future building mounted signs that may be proposed on Building "A". This condition shall not take effect until final approval of the proposed I -Fly tenant space and improvements to Building "A". All future signage, both building mounted and freestanding, shall have a design that is consistent with this approved design review application and shall require the approval of the Director before issuance of any sign permits. BM Page 13 of 13 08/18/2010 3:10:00 PM C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\Brandon.doc • City of Tu,kwgia Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director CHAIR, BILL ARTHUR, VICE -CHAIR, MARGARET BRATCHER, COMMISSIONERS, GEORGE MALINA, LYNN PETERSON, BROOKE ALFORD, THOMAS MCLEOD AND LOUISE STRANDER BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 26, 2010 - 6:30 PM TUKWILA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER II. ATTENDANCE III. ADOPTION OF 07-22-10 MINUTES CASE NUMBER: L10-045 APPLICANT: David Fey for I -Fly REQUEST: I -Fly is proposing to renovate an existing commercial complex to house an indoor sky diving operation. Portions of the existing building will be demolished and a new 8,000 square foot addition will be constructed. The proposed addition will be 70 feet tall and have the appearance of a wind tower. Associated site improvements include restriping of parking, removal of parking for the installation of electrical transformer, and construction of a pedestrian plaza. LOCATION: 301 Tukwila Parkway Director's report Adjourn 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206-431-3670 0 Fax: 206-431-3665 1 (2)/c41(/ v, 1V\ o�r� I FLY PRESENTATION 1. Introduction Tonight the BAR is being asked to review and approve the construction of a two story, 8,000 square foot indoor skydiving operation, proposed building improvements, and associated site modifications at 301 Tukwila Parkway. Staff recommends approval of the project with conditions. 2. Appearance of Fairness Questions 3. Review of applicable criteria a. TMC 18.60.050 Design Review b. Landscaping c. TUC Development Standards d. Sign Code 4. Site Location a. The project site lies in the heart of the Southcenter area of the City, sitting at the SE corner of Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West, directly across the street from the old Bank of America location. b. Besides the Mall, adjacent land uses includes, Acme Bowl to the south, Lowes to the east, and I-405 from the north. c. The property has exceptional visibility from I-405 and the Southcenter area. 5. Existing Site Development a. There are currently two buildings located on the 3.24 acre site 1. Building A, the proposed location of the I -Fly, is approximately 35,000 square feet, one story and was constructed in 1962. 2. Building B, located south of building A is one story with a square footage of approximately 8,500 square feet. 3. Uses in the existing two buildings includes a mix of retail, a restaurant, and offices. b. The site contains mature landscaping, include a nice row of ash trees along Tukwila Parkway. These trees create a uniform street precense with the trees on the Lowe's site there are not trees located along Andover Park West. This creates a significant gap in the City's tree coverage along the street. c. An existing grand monument sign is located along Andover Park West. The sign has colors and design that matches the colors of the existing buildings. 6. Proposed Development a. Site Plan 1. Building location is unchanged, the building is essentially being dissected and a new building being constructed 2. Minor amount of new landscaping. 3. New PSE Transformer 7. Building Design a. The functional use of the building (wind tower) impacts the overall design of the building. b. The applicant has noted that their goal is to create a "landmark" tower which will be easily visible to motorists along I-405 and the surrounding Southcenter area. The building's design attempts to bring in the design of many of the other adjacent "landmark structures. 1. The tower element is similar to the land mark towers at Acme Bowl, LA Fitness, and the mall addition. 2. The design also bring in modern finishes that are similar to LA Fitness, Acme Bowl, the Mall, B of A and Fidality. 8. The building design can be broken down into four parts: a. Tower Element 1. Pedestrain scale is maintained, the tower element rises out of the back. The ground floor finishes have finishes that are pedestrian friendly such as the entry features. The east and west building elevations are not located directly along the tower. b. South facade c. North facade d. Secondary building improvements. 9. Building B improvements. a. Applicant is proposing no modifications. The proposed two buildings would not be compatible with each other in the terms of design. Currently they have colors and lines that are consistent and intergrated. This is being lost in the design that is currently proposed. One of the guidelines is that buildings have a texture, and lines, and masses that is consistent. Staff reccomends that building "B" be painted to match building "A" 10. Lighting 11. Landscaping, trigger is required when design review is triggered (TMC 18.70.090) 12. Bike racks, compliance is only required if additional parking is required. 13. Signage, existing sign design is consistent with the current design of the building. Will be lost under the proposed project. - L -4\‘%t3 ailfPc-A e)14LA t,11)2( ?i'D‘(1(\ n'n—\ isfku'"/ (08/26/2010) Brandon Miles - CommissiorrPeterson question/comments on L10-045 Page 1 From: To: Date: Subject: CC: Brandon, "Peterson, Lynn E" <Iynn.e.peterson@boeing.com> Brandon Miles <bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us> 08/24/2010 1:47 PM Commissioner Peterson question/comments on L10-045 Nora Gierloff <ngierloff@ci.tukwila.wa.us> While on my lunch break I thought I'd send a few thoughts on my mind related to L10-0so you come prepared to address them if I ask about these topics during the meeting. 1) The west and east elevations of the upper structure are unique and may exhibij(what artists call negative space (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_space) and/or white space (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_space_(visual_arts)). It is less clear that the south elevation (and to a lesser extent north elevation due to store fronts) presents suitable modulation for what appears to be a rather expansive area of industrial looking material punctuated by planter at the base, 3 light fixtures, a louver/vent, and a transition seam at the vertical arch/beam intersection. My concern is that while understand the nature of the use and the physics that drive the structure shape/size/geometry (a wind tunnel versus a office tower with windows and other architectural details), I believe that consideration of the fact that it is a wind tunnel is beyond the scope of the BAR, so I have to view this as a simple wall and ask myself if I would allow similar "walls" on other projects (past or set precedence for in the future). Could you speak to this during your staff report (put size in perspective with the overall project, likelihood to be viewed at certain perspectives, etc). 2) To ask what might seem like a silly question, how do I look at this upper structure? I'm mostly looking forward to when somebody wants to build a similar structure on their building to mount signs up high claiming that this structure is like the iFly structure, which could be considered nothing more than roof top screening/enclosure of roof top air ducts. 3) To date, most of my time on the PC has been looking at projects that were "clean slate" (versus remodel/reuse), with the exception of the recent Shasta Beverage project, some discussion during the mall remodel a ways back, and discussion of "triggers" during the SMP and TUC Plan work. During your staff presentation would you touch on triggers for this project with special focus on landscaping recommendation (#1) and "reaching" out to putting conditions on remote building "B" (#2). I basically need to be brought up to speed on how it is within my authority to support those recommendations should I decide to following public hearing testimony. 4) Assuming question 3 answer is that we are on solid legal ground, recommendation #2 discusses matching only the color scheme. Lacking photographs and/or elevations of existing building B, is it staffs intention to also have building B upgraded with the same "New corrugated metal panel" (texture) and "New decorative metal tension rod welded to existing canopy" (architectural detail) as shown in the "details" illustration (attachment A of staff report, page 12, left side illustration) or is it strictly limited to color? 5) Could you speak to nighttime illumination of this structure to clarify how and where lighting will be placed in case the one perspective drawing (attachment A of staff report, page 9, labeled "perspective 5") is not a accurate portrayal or clear depiction of sides (or interal negative space under arch) not shown by this illustration. Also discuss how "light pollution" is controlled (intensity, direction, etc), if this is a issue or part of the criteria we are to consider. Lynn (08/26/2010) Brandon Miles - RE: Commigner Peterson question/comments on L10— 5 Page 1 From: "Peterson, Lynn E" <lynn.e.peterson@boeing.com> To: Brandon Miles <bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 08/24/2010 3:08 PM Subject: RE: Commissioner Peterson question/comments on L10-045 CC: Nora Gierloff <ngierloff@ci.tukwila.wa.us> Brandon, One more item: 6) I didn't see any mention of bicycle racks (existing, proposed, or required). In light of the "Walk and Roll Plan" and general intent of the Tukwila Urban Center Plan, are there not derived requirements to justify requesting that new development (or in this case modifications) trigger encouragement or at least accommodate safe/secure parking of non -motorized transportation (bicycles)? Lynn From: Peterson, Lynn E Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:47 PM To: Brandon Miles Cc: Nora Gierloff Subject: Commissioner Peterson question/comments on L10-045 Brandon, While on my lunch break I thought I'd send a few thoughts on my mind related to L10-045 so you come prepared to address them if I ask about these topics during the meeting. 1) The west and east elevations of the upper structure are unique and may exhibit what artists call negative space (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_space) and/or white space (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_space_(visual_arts)). It is less clear that the south elevation (and to a lesser extent north elevation due to store fronts) presents suitable modulation for what appears to be a rather expansive area of industrial looking material punctuated by planter at the base, 3 light fixtures, a louver/vent, and a transition seam at the vertical arch/beam intersection. My concern is that while I understand the nature of the use and the physics that drive the structure shape/size/geometry (a wind tunnel versus a office tower with windows and other architectural details), I believe that consideration of the fact that it is a wind tunnel is beyond the scope of the BAR, so I have to view this as a simple wall and ask myself if I would allow similar "walls" on other projects (past or set precedence for in the future). Could you speak to this during your staff report (put size in perspective with the overall project, likelihood to be viewed at certain perspectives, etc). 2) To ask what might seem like a silly question, how do I look at this upper structure? I'm mostly looking forward to when somebody wants to build a similar structure on their building to mount signs up high claiming that this structure is like the iFly structure, which could be considered nothing more than roof top screening/enclosure of roof top air ducts. 3) To date, most of my time on the PC has been looking at projects that were "clean slate" (versus remodel/reuse), with the exception of the recent Shasta Beverage project, some discussion during the mall remodel a ways back, and discussion of "triggers" during the SMP and TUC Plan work. During your staff presentation would you touch on triggers for this project with special focus on landscaping recommendation (#1) and "reaching" out to putting conditions on remote building "B" (#2). I basically need to be brought up to speed on how it is within my authority to support those recommendations should I decide to following public hearing testimony. 4) Assuming question 3 answer is that we are on solid legal ground, recommendation #2 discusses (08/26/2010) Brandon Miles - RE: Commironer Peterson question/comments on L105 Page 2 matching only the color scheme. Lacking photographs and/or elevations of existing building B, is it staffs intention to also have building B upgraded with the same "New corrugated metal panel" (texture) and "New decorative metal tension rod welded to existing canopy" (architectural detail) as shown in the "details" illustration (attachment A of staff report, page 12, left side illustration) or is it strictly limited to color? 5) Could you speak to nighttime illumination of this structure to clarify how and where lighting will be placed in case the one perspective drawing (attachment A of staff report, page 9, labeled "perspective 5") is not a accurate portrayal or clear depiction of sides (or interal negative space under arch) not shown by this illustration. Also discuss how "light pollution" is controlled (intensity, direction, etc), if this is a issue or part of the criteria we are to consider. Lynn • City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing Location: 301 Tukwila Pkwy, King County Parcel #022300-0010 File #'s L10-045 Applicant: David Fey with Jensen Fey Architecture Property Owners: Beta Holding LTD Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner, (206) 431-3684 or bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Project Description: I -Fly is proposing to renovate an existing com- mercial complex to house an indoor sky diving operation.. The proposed addition will be 70 feet tall and have the appearance of a wind tower. Associated site improvements include restriping of parking, removal of parking for the installation of electrical transformer, and construction of j a pedestrian plaza. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be deliv- ered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on August 26, 2010. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-3684. A public hearing has been scheduled for August 26, 2010 at 6:30PM before the BAR. The hearing -will take place at 6200 Southcenter Blvd in the City Council Chambers. OWNER_NAME ACME -MANAGER QDOBA - MANAGER UPS -MANAGER SUSHILAND - MANAGER SPRINT - MANAGER LOWES HIW INC WEA SOUTHCENTER LLC CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN • TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER BETA HOLDINGS LTD TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER RAINBOW ASSOCIATES LTD TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER LA FITNESS TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER ROYAL COACHMAN ASSOCIATES LLC KC HOUSING AUTHORITY TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER OWNER_ADDRESS 100 ANDOVER PARK W 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #130 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #150 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #160 100 ANDOVER PARK W - Ste B 101 ANDOVER PARK E 200 11601 WILSHIRE BLVD 150 ANDOVER PARK W 15455 65TH AVE S 18827 BOTHELL WAY NE 225 TUKWILA PKWY 22820 148TH AVE SE 301 TUKWILA PKWY 313 TUKWILA PKWY 319 TUKWILA PKWY 321 TUKWILA PKWY 325 TUKWILA PKWY 327 TUKWILA PKWY 331 TUKWILA PKWY 339 TUKWILA PKWY 341 TUKWILA PKWY 345 TUKWILA PKWY 349 TUKWILA PKWY 350 BAKER BLVD 401 EVANS BLACK DR 401 TUKWILA PKWY 406 EVANS BLACK DR 415 BAKER BLVD 200 600 ANDOVER PARK W 6400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 70 ANDOVER PARK W OWNER_CITY OWNER_STATE OWNER_ZIP TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 BOTHELL WA 98011 TUKWILA WA 98188 KENT WA 98042 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATTLE WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 • • NAME WA DEPT OF ECOLOGY KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE QWEST COMMUNICATIONS PUGET SOUND ENERGY BP OLYMPIC PIPELINE KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON CITY OF SEATAC DEPT ADDRESS SEPA REVIEW PO BOX 47703 ACCOUNTING DIVISION 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A 23315 66th AVE S PO BOX 90868 2319 LIND AVENUE SW 220 FOURTH AVE S PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1055 S GRADY WAY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4800 S 188th STREET CITY ST ZIP OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 SEATTLE WA 98104 KENT WA 98032 BELLEVUE WA 98009-0868 RENTON WA 98055 KENT WA 98032 RENTON WA 98055 SEATAC WA 98188-8605 • • SCHNEIDER,GERALD E 15523 TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER MSI 6400 TUKWILA TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER SEATTLE CITY OF BANK OF AMERICA OPEN FRAME LLC SOUTHCENTER MALL MANAGEMENT SEAFOOD CITY MARKET - MANAGER 7517 GREENWOOD AVE N 80 ANDOVER PARK W 83 S KING ST 606 90 ANDOVER PARK W PO BOX 34018 PO BOX 34029 PO BOX 88198 2800 SOUTHCENTER MALL 1368 SOUTHCENTER MALL SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA 98103 98188 98104 98188 98124 98124 98138 98188 98188 • e al f • Department Of Community Development - _ __ AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: x Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: L10-045 Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailing requested by: Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice /7.) Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _12 day of August in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: I -Fly, David Fey with Jensen Fey Architecture Project Number: L10-045 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: /7.) Zia( ),,/a if _ W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC � z City of Tukwila �r f1 October 5, 2010 DAVID FEY Jensen Fey Architects 7730 Leary Way Redmond, WA 98052 Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director RE: Notice of Application, SEPA Determination I -Fly, 301 Tukwila PY E10-018 Dear Mr. Fey: vatt .\)Z There is a fee due on your permit application in the amount of $44.00 to cover mailing the attached public notice. The number of required notices sent for your application was 44 which included property owners and tenants within 500 feet of your project site as well as interested parties and agencies with jurisdiction. The cost is based on the land use fee schedule adopted by Resolution Number 1718 covering Public Notice mailings required for your application. This fee covers the attached notice only. Additional fees may be assessed for future mailings or other review tasks per the fee schedule. This amount needs to be paid before the city can continue processing your permit application. The payment may be paid by cash, check or credit card. The city will accept credit card payments by phone. If paying by check please send the check made out to: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 If payment is not received within 15 days of this notice your permit application may be put on hold. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 206 431 3670. Sincerely, Teri Svedahl Administrative Support Technician MD Invoicing Public Mailings.doc Page 1 of 1 10/04/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 TO: Development Review Supplemental Memorandum Public Works Development Review Staff Fire Development Review Staff Building Development Review FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planne DATE: October 1, 2010 RE: I -Fly Design Review PL10-036, L10-045 RECEIVED OCT 01 F010 TUKWLA PUBLIC � WORKS Project Description I -Fly has previously received design review approval for construction of an indoor skydiving operation at 301 Tukwila Pkwy. The applicant has determined that as part of the project they will need to remove approximately 2100 cubic yards of soil material which is above the SEPA exempt amount. Notes to Development Review Team o Please provide any comments by October 21, 2010 regarding the proposed project. This maybe your only opportunity to review or provide comments on this project. Please list any additional permits or requirements that you Department may impose on the project. Any condition should be supported by applicable code citations. o Remember to track you time to permits plus. Thanks. de' w /14;ced e&yi, d„-a.,Q,47 62,Au,,hes JOatituA2---- 519--ef-cce-r to/opocit ote LIO-045 TO: Development Review Supplemental Memorandum Public Works Development Review Fire Development Review Staff Building Development Review ff FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner DATE: October 1, 2010 RE: I -Fly Design Review PL10-036, L10-045 Project Description I -Fly has previously received design review approval for construction of an indoor skydiving operation at 301 Tukwila Pkwy. The applicant has determined that as part of the project they will need to remove approximately 2100 cubic yards of soil material which is above the SEPA exempt amount. Notes to Development Review Team o Please provide any comments by October 21, 2010 regarding the proposed project. This maybe your only opportunity to review or provide comments on this project. Please list any additional permits or requirements that you Department may impose on the project. Any condition should be supported by applicable code citations. o Remember to track you time to permits plus. Thanks. 1/61gV4Ate.Aee71- Tukwila Fire Department Interdepartmental Memo October 11, 2010 To: Brandon Miles, DCD From: B/C Tomaso RE: PL 10 — 036 & L10 — 045, Fire Comments Fire has the following comments for this project at this time additional comments will be made with future permit activity for Public Works, Building and Fire. 1 Have the Owner/Contractor provide emergency response procedure information for excavation collapse/shoring failure. 2 Provide the fire department with an up to date contact list for the project, to include Owner, Contractor and Sub Contractors' for excavation/shoring portions of the project. Let me know if the owner/contractor or DCD staff has any questions in this matter. tleo s �vQ � HNICAL MEMORANDUM p1Vp TO: Bill Adams Cc: Dave Fey/Blaze Bresko PREPARED BY: H. Michael Xue, P.E./ Siew L. Tan, P.E. SUBJECT: • PanGE® I N C O R P O R A T I O Geolechnical d Earthquake Engineering Consultants TEMPORARY SHORING DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS I -FLY SEATTLE TUKWILA PARKWAY AND ANDOVER PARK WEST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PROJECT NO.: 09-145 DATE: August 31, 2010 This technical memorandum provides our supplement geotechnical recommendation for the proposed project. Based on the information provided, we understand that the current design will require temporary excavations to about 19'/2 feet below the existing grade to construct the below -grade structure. We also understand that a temporary soldier pile and tieback wall will -be used to provide the temporary excavation support. As such, we are providing the following recommendations for design of the temporary soldier pile and tieback wall: 1. Design Parameters Active Earth Pressure: Passive Resistance: Lagging: Surcharge Pressure: Soldier Pile Vertical capacity: Skin Friction 0.8 ksf (allowable) End Bearing 8 ksf (allowable) 2. Tieback Design and Testing The manner in which the tieback anchors carry load will depend on the type of anchor selected, the method of installation, and the soil conditions surrounding the anchor. Accordingly, we recommend use of a performance specification requiring the shoring 35 pcf 200 pcf (allowable) 250 psf uniform pressure 0.3* q psf (q is surface load, uniform distribution) 3213 Eastlake Ave E. Ste B Seattle, \VA 98102. Tel (206) 262-0370 Fax (206) 262-0374 • Temporary Shoring Design Recommendations I -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA August 31, 2010 • contractor to install anchors capable of satisfactorily achieving the design structural loads, with a pullout resistance factor of safety of 2.0. For planning purposes, however, the anchors may be sized for an allowable soil -concrete friction value of 2.5 ksf, assuming that small diameter (about 6 inches) pressure -grouted tiebacks will be used. Post -grouting will be needed in order to achieve the design capacity. The tiebacks for this project should be installed by experienced personnel. Temporary casings may be required for tieback hole drilling to prevent caving and excessive ground loss. In addition, the use of compressed air to flush the drill cuttings must be properly controlled; the use of excessive amount of compressed air while drilling tiebacks could lead to reduction of soil strength and ground movements. The actual capacity of the anchors should be checked with 200 percent verification tests. At least two 200 -percent tests should be performed prior to installing production anchors. The tieback design may need to be modified if the design capacity cannot be achieved. All production anchors should be proof tested to 133% of the design load. The anchor installations should be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the Post Tensioning Institute (PTI) "Recommendations for Prestressed Rock and Soil Anchors". Elements of the testing are as follows: Verification Tests (200% Tests) • Prior to installing production anchors, perform a minimum of two tests each on each anchor type, installation method and soil type with the tested anchors constructed to the same dimensions as production anchors. • Test locations to be determined in conjunction and approved by the geotechnical engineer. • Test anchors, which will be loaded to 200% of the design load, may require additional prestressing steel (steel load not to exceed 80% of the ultimate tensile strength) or reinforcing of the soldier pile. • Load test anchors to 200% load in 25% design load increments, holding each incremental load for at least 5 minutes and recording deflection of the anchor head at various times within each hold to the nearest 0.01 inch. • At the 200% load, the holding period shall be at least 60 minutes. • A successful test shall provide a measured creep rate of 0.04 inches or less at the 200% load between 1 and 10 minutes, and 0.08 inches or less between 6 and 60 minutes and 24 and 240 minutes, and all time increments shall have a creep rate that is linear or decreasing with time. The applied load must remain 09-145 shoring Memo.doc Page 2 of 3 • • Temporary Shoring Design Recommendations I -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA August 31, 2010 constant during all holding periods (i.e. no more than 5% variation from the specified load). Proof Tests (133% load tests on all production anchors) ■ Load test all production anchors to 133% of the design load in 25% design load increments, holding each incremental load until a stable deflection is achieved (record deflection of the anchor head at various times within each hold to the nearest 0.01 inch). ■ At the 133% load, the holding period shall be at least 10 minutes • A successful test shall provide a measured creep rate of 0.04 inches or less at the 133% load between 1 and 10 minutes with a creep rate that is linear or decreasing with time. The applied load must remain constant during the holding period (i.e. no more than 5% variation from the 133% load). Anchors failing this proof testing creep acceptance criteria may be held an additional 50 minutes for creep measurement. Acceptable performance would equate to a creep of 0.08 inches or less between 5 and 50 minutes with a linear or decreasing creep rate. Verification tested anchors or extended creep proof tested anchors not meeting the acceptance criteria will require a redesign by the contractor to achieve the acceptance criteria. In the tieback construction, a bond breaker shall be constructed in the no load zone when the installation procedures use single stage grouting. 3. Construction Dewatering Groundwater is anticipated to be at about 15 to 16 feet below the existing ground surface. As such, the contractor should be prepared to provide temporary dewatering systems for the excavation. Based on our understanding of the project and site conditions, we anticipate that a conventional dewatering system consisting of trenches, sumps and pumps will be adequate to dewater the temporary excavation. For planning purpose, a dewatering volume of about 15 gallons per minute may be used. This estimated volume is considered to be conservative and the actual groundwater volume should be less. We trust that the information presented herein meets your needs at this time. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. 09-145 shoring Memo.doc Page 3 of 3 • • • S-i52nd•St C.on'gacies•W JN ' {r, f 7s it 0/ Yr 4.S 54161St -St rp (? jf y Ln m G n 0 ,...A, H • .moi sU��S.1163rd•PI—Q'-gQQ� d'�o i , -- 1 C'� ti '• t) SY64thiSt i bit 2,125) 1 Jt^n ,u� �r -2Oi0!Google. DESIGN R 1 SUBMITIfAL 0J AERIAL VICINITY MAP not to scale 'FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWIIA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS Jrl • • MONUMENT SIGN !I(.,WILA PARKWAY (5. 158th • EXIST. SIDE WALK STREET) EXIST. LANDSCAPE SCREEN EXIST. TREES IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 2?' X 35' WING 5 NOT TO 20 EXIT". PARGNG LANDSCAPE ALL EXISTING PLANTER TO BE PATCHED TO MATCH EXISTING CONC. WALKWAY NEW TRANSFO (8X8'XG'HT) EXIST. CONC. • RVE TO BE REMOVE NEW 6" CONC. URVf 26.28' EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK y%3 23':3' EXISTING BUILDING _LIb27.05' FINISH FLOOR Y 2 I ,907 5F N s 20-0" H G7'-4" EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK 4 EXIST PARKING 28 EXIST. FARKING NEW LANDING 23.56' LANDSCAPE 03 7 EXIST. PARKING 8 EXIST. PARKING Ln EXISTING BUILDING 4 24.41' FINISH FLOOR 8,4 17 SF TAL EXISTING I/LDG AREA: TOTAL IFLY USUABLE BLDG AREA : TOTAL BLDG AREA: 39,546 Sr, 39,546X(3.3/ 1000)= 13 I PARKING STALLS 7,934 SF, = 26 PARKING STALLS 47,725 SF ul TRASH 17 EXIST. PARKING 1 7 EXIST. PARKING 2C EXIST AVAILABLEREA FOR CONTRACT R USE PL,- 450.0' TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: (I 3 I +26) = 157 STALLS TOTAL EXISTING PARKING (INCL. 5 HANDICAP STALLS): 163 STALLS 0000 LANDSCAPE d SITE PIAN 6"= 1-0" 8 0 0 u 0 0 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET I 1 • IST. 'ARM G Jlf IN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING ALL EXISTING PLANTER TO BE PATCHED TO MATCH EXISTING CONC. WALKWAY NEW TRANSFO (8X8'XG'HT) EXIST. CONC. • RVE TO BE REMOVE NEW 6" CONC. URVf 26.28' EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK y%3 23':3' EXISTING BUILDING _LIb27.05' FINISH FLOOR Y 2 I ,907 5F N s 20-0" H G7'-4" EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK 4 EXIST PARKING 28 EXIST. FARKING NEW LANDING 23.56' LANDSCAPE 03 7 EXIST. PARKING 8 EXIST. PARKING Ln EXISTING BUILDING 4 24.41' FINISH FLOOR 8,4 17 SF TAL EXISTING I/LDG AREA: TOTAL IFLY USUABLE BLDG AREA : TOTAL BLDG AREA: 39,546 Sr, 39,546X(3.3/ 1000)= 13 I PARKING STALLS 7,934 SF, = 26 PARKING STALLS 47,725 SF ul TRASH 17 EXIST. PARKING 1 7 EXIST. PARKING 2C EXIST AVAILABLEREA FOR CONTRACT R USE PL,- 450.0' TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: (I 3 I +26) = 157 STALLS TOTAL EXISTING PARKING (INCL. 5 HANDICAP STALLS): 163 STALLS 0000 LANDSCAPE d SITE PIAN 6"= 1-0" 8 0 0 u 0 0 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 '°B "°: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND,WA 98052 �413.103111 ` 425-211,0329 PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 511EET: A105 OF: SHEETS December 23, 2009 File No. 09-145 Mr. Bill Adams Rotorway International 7150 West Erie Street Chandler, AZ 85226 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study U -Fly Seattle Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West Tukwila, WA PanGE® Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants Dear Mr. Adams, As requested, PanGEO Inc. completed a geotechnical engineering study to assist you and the design team with a proposed indoor diving structure named "U -Fly Seattle" in Tukwila, Washington. This study was performed in accordance with our mutually agreed scope of work as outlined in our proposal dated April 14, 2009 and our supplemental proposal dated November 13, 2009, which were subsequently authorized by you. Our service scope included reviewing readily available geologic and geotechnical data, advancing two cone penetration tests, drilling one test boring and converting it to a groundwater monitoring well, and developing the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West, within an existing strip mall, in the City of Tukwila, Washington (see Figure 1, Vicinity Map). We understand that the proposed development will consist of construction of an indoor skydiving facility in the middle portion of the existing one-story retail building housing with a parking lot (see Figure 2). Based on the current design, a portion of the existing on -story building will be demolished to create an area of approximately 72 feet by 112 feet for the proposed development. The indoor skydiving facility will have an 80 -foot high tower structure with a plan dimension of about 34 feet by 85 feet, which will be centered within the construction area. We also understand that the lowest level (Plenum Chamber) of the tower structure will extend about 13 to 14 feet below the existing grade (see Plate 1 on next page). As such, excavations on the order of 15 feet will be required to construct the plenum chamber. 2021 A — Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 Tel (206) 262-0370 Fax (206) 262-0374 • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 The conclusions and recommendations outlined in this report are based on our understanding of the proposed development, which is in turn based on the project information provided. If the above project description is substantially different from your proposed improvements or if the project scope changes, PanGEO should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this study and make modifications, if needed. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS CURRENT EXPLORATION Our field exploration consisted of advancing two cone penetration tests (CPTs) to depths of approximately 50 and 60 feet, drilling one boring to a depth of about 17 feet, and converting the borehole to a groundwater monitoring well. The CPTs were performed on November 5, 2009 by Northwest Cone Exploration of Snohomish, Washington, under a subcontract to PanGEO. The boring (BH -1) was drilled at the site on December 1, 2009, using a hand -operated portable drill rig owned and operated by CN Drilling of Seattle, Washington. The approximate CPT and boring locations were taped in the field from on-site features, and are plotted on Figure 2. Yt'C� Plate 1. Transverse section of the proposed indoor skydiving facility. A CPT consists of pushing an instrumented cone, approximately 1 -inch in diameter, into a soil deposit from a truck mounted reaction frame, and measuring the resistance and pore water pressure on the tip and side of the cone. Higher tip resistance measurements indicate the soil deposit has a higher strength or density than lower tip resistance measurements. The resistances to continuous penetration encountered by the cone tip and adjacent friction sleeve also exhibit high sensitivity to changes in soil type, which may be correlated to differing soil types and strength parameters. The subcontractor backfilled the sounding holes using sand and bentonite and patched the surface with asphalt cold patch. The hand portable drill rig was equipped with 4 -inch outside diameter hollow stem augers. Soil samples were obtained from the borings at 5 -foot depth intervals in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampling methods (ASTM test method D-1586) in which the samples are obtained using a 2 -inch outside diameter split -spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the soil a distance of 18 inches using a 140 -pound weight freely falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required for each 6 -inch increment of sampler penetration was recorded. The number of blows required to achieve the last 12 inches of sample penetration is defined as the SPT N -value. The N -value provides an empirical measure of the relative density of cohesionless soil, or the relative consistency of fine-grained soils. The boring was converted 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 2 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 to a groundwater monitoring well. Summary CPT and boring logs are attached as Figures 3 through 5. PREVIOUS EXPLORATION As part of our study, we collected and reviewed the results of previous explorations conducted in the vicinity of the project site. Specifically, one boring was located at the west end of the strip mall (see Figure 2) where the proposed development is planned (Earth Consultants, Inc., 1985). The summary log of the Earth Consultant's boring is included in Appendix A for reference. SITE GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS According to Geologic Map of the Des Moines 7.5' Quadrangle, King County, Washington (Booth, D.B., Waldron, H.H. and Troost, K.G. 2004), the project site is underlain by fills overlying recent alluvium. Booth et al. described recent alluvium deposits as generally consisting of interbedded, loose to very loose sand to silty sand, and soft to medium stiff silt and clay with occasional thin peat seams and some organics. The CPTs and test boring completed at the site generally confirmed the mapped geology as summarized below: Unit 1 -Fill: The upper approximately 17 to 18 feet of the soil profile generally consists of very stiff to hard silt and clay with interbedded layers of medium dense to dense silty sand. Based on the structure of the soil in the boring and site geology, we interpret this layer as fill. Unit 2 — Alluvium: Below the fill, CPT -01, CPT -02, and previous boring encountered alluvial deposits consisted of interbedded layers of soft to stiff silt and clay, and medium dense to dense sand and silty sand extending to at least the maximum depth of the CPTs at about 50 and 59 feet, respectively. The alluvial deposits are anticipated to exhibit low to moderate strength and moderate to relatively high compressibility. Thesaturated, relatively clean alluvial sand layers are also considered liquefaction prone. The fine-grained silty clay and clay are anticipated to exhibit low susceptibility to soil liquefaction. Groundwater: Based on pore pressure measurements and pore pressure dissipation tests from the CPTs, we estimate that the groundwater at a depth of about 14 feet at the time of our testing. Groundwater was measured at about 15 feet below the concrete floor in the monitoring well on December 8 and 16, 2009. Groundwater level is anticipated to fluctuate, and is expected to be the highest during the winter/spring months. 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 3 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Seismic design of the structure can be accomplished using the 2006 International Building Code (IBC), which specifies a design earthquake having a 2% probability of occurrence in 50 years (return interval of 2,475 years). The following parameters, which are consistent with the 2002 USGS seismic hazard maps, are recommended for the seismic evaluation of the building, if needed: Table 1. 2006 IBC Seismic Design Parameters Site Class Spectral Acceleration at 0.2 sec. (g) Ss Spectral Acceleration at 1.0 sec. (g) S, Site Coefficients Design Spectral Response Parameters Control Periods (sec.) Design PGA (S1 s/2.5) Fa F,. Sis SDI To Ts E 1.425 0.488 0.9 2.4 0.86 0.78 0.18 0.90 0.34 LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated and relatively cohesionless soil deposits temporarily lose strength as a result of earthquake shaking. Primary factors controlling the development of liquefaction include intensity and duration of strong ground motion, characteristics of subsurface soils, in-situ stress conditions and the depth to groundwater. For the levels of ground shaking consistent with the 2006 IBC design earthquake, which has a return period of about 2,500 years, it is our opinion that the potential for soil liquefaction at the site is relatively high. However, the potential liquefaction hazard will be generally limited to loose to medium dense sand layers (SPT N -values < 25) within the depth range of about 25 feet to 32 feet in CPT -01 and between about 31 to 34 feet, and 46 to 50 feet in CPT -02. The fine- grained silt and clay and dense sand encountered in the CPTs are considered to have a low liquefaction potential. Although theoretical computations may suggest that liquefaction could extend below a depth of 50 feet, as a practical matter, effects of soil liquefaction occurring deeper than about 50 feet are not likely to be manifest at the ground surface. Potential effects of soil liquefaction include ground settlement. The theoretical settlement due to soil liquefaction for this event is estimated to be on the order of 2 to 3 inches using a method developed by Tokimatsu & Seed. Theoretical estimation has proven to be too conservative in the Puget Sound region. We anticipate the actual settlement to be half of the theoretical 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page. 4 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 calculation. It is our opinion that the impacts of this magnitude of soil settlement would not significantly impact egress from the structure. TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS AND SHORING As currently planned, excavations about 14 to 15 feet deep may be needed to construct the plenum chamber of the tower. We anticipate that the excavations will largely encounter medium dense to dense silty sand and medium stiff to very stiff silt and clay. All temporary excavations should be performed in accordance with Part N of WAC (Washington Administrative Code) 296-155. The contractor is responsible for maintaining safe excavation slopes and/or shoring. Foundation excavations more than 4 feet deep need to be sloped or shored. For planning purposes, unsupported open cut may be sloped no more than 1 H:1 V. Based on our current understanding of the structure layout and foundation elevation, sufficient space is available for a 1 H: I V sloped open cut along all four sides. The temporary cut slopes should be re-evaluated in the field during construction and can be adjusted based on actual observed soil conditions. The cut slopes may need to be flattered in the wet reasons and should be covered with plastic sheets. We' also recommend that heavy construction equipment, building materials, excavated soil, and vehicular traffic should not be allowed within a distance equal to 1/3 the slope height from the top of any excavation. Surface runoff water should be prevented from entering excavations during wet weather. The temporary cut slopes should be carefully monitored at all times. If signs of slope instability is noted, the temporary cut slopes should either be flattened or temporary shoring be provided to stabilize the cut slopes. Construction Dewatering: The groundwater level is anticipated to be about 15 to 16 feet below the ground surface in the summer months and could be as high as 13 feet in the winter months. Based on the current schedule, we understand that foundation construction will occur in the dry season. As such, groundwater is anticipated to be near the excavation bottom. In our opinion, use of drainage ditches and sump pumps will provide adequate construction dewatering. During wet weather, runoff water should be prevented from entering excavations. The temporary cut slopes should be carefully monitored at all times. If signs of slope instability is noted, the temporary cut slopes should either be flattened or temporary shoring be provided to stabilize the cut slopes immediately. Excavation Monitoring: Ground movements may occur as a result of excavation activities. As a result, conditions of the adjacent structures and the ground surface elevation should be documented prior to commencing earthwork to provide baseline data. We recommend that the existing one-story building to the east and west of the excavation be continuously monitored during foundation constructions. The asphalt parking lot within 15 feet of the excavation should 09-145 U-FIy Seattle Rpt.doc Page 5 PanGEO, Inc. Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 also be monitored for signs of ground movements. This may include existing crack surveys and photo -documentations. Optical survey points and ground markers should be established on existing building corners and around the perimeter of the excavation as the excavation proceeds. We recommend that the monitoring be performed by the contractor, and the results submitted to PanGEO for review. The results of the monitoring will allow the design team to confirm design parameters, and for the contractor to make adjustments if necessary. FOUNDATIONS We understand that the foundation level of the skydiving tower structure will be at about 13 to 14 feet below the surface. However, the foundations for other proposed elements (one-story structures) will be constructed near the existing ground surface. Based on the subsurface conditions anticipated at the tower foundation levels and our understanding of the design, it is our opinion that a mat foundation is the most appropriate and cost-effective foundation system to support the tower structure; conventional shallow footings are considered appropriate to support other at -grade structures. Mat Foundation A mat foundation should be used to support the tower structure. A mat foundation will distribute the loads from the structure over a wide area, and based on our understanding with the structural engineer, will impose a bearing pressure of less than about 1500 psf. To provide a uniform support and to improve the performance of the structure, we recommend removing one foot of soil below the mat slab and replace it with 2- to 4 -inch quarry spalls. We recommend a layer of high-strength woven geotextile, such as Mirafi 600X or equivalent, be placed below quarry spalls. If soft organic soils or peat are encountered at the over -excavation level, additional over - excavation may be needed as determined in the field by the geotechnical engineer during construction. With the subgrade improvement discussed above, we recommend the use of a modulus of subgrade reaction of 120 pci for the mat slab design. Spread/Continuous Footings At -grade structures may be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings. The footings should be supported on 12 inches of compacted structural fill. The structural fill should extend at least 12 inches beyond the edge of the footings. The native soil should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition prior to placement of structural fill. If the native soil cannot be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition, they should be over -excavated as determined in the field during construction by the geotechnical engineer. Structural fill compacted to 95% of its maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor). Import free - draining granular fill should be used as structural fill as the existing on-site material has a high fines content and may be too wet to compact. 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 6 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 We recommend that an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf be used for sizing spread/continuous footings bearing on the compacted structural fill. For allowable stress design, the recommended bearing pressure may be increased by one-third for transient loading, such as wind or seismic forces. Exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of 18 inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations should be placed at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the top of slab. Foundation Performance Total and differential settlements are anticipated to be within tolerable limits for foundation elements designed and constructed as discussed above. Provided the foundation subgrade is prepared as described above, mat foundation settlement is estimated to be approximately 1/2 inch or less with differential settlement on the order of inch under the static loading condition. Conventional footing settlement for at -grade structures is also anticipated to be approximately 1/2 inch, and differential settlement between adjacent columns should be less than about 1/4 inch under the static loading condition. The total settlement for mat foundation and spread/continuous footings due to seismic shaking may be on the may be on the order of 2 inches with differential settlement on the order of about '/2 inch during an IBC code -level design earthquake. Lateral Resistance Lateral forces from unbalanced earth pressures, wind, or seismic loading may be resisted by a combination of passive earth pressures acting against the embedded portions of the foundations and walls, and by friction acting on the base of the foundations. Passive resistance values may be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This value includes a factor safety of at least 1.5 assuming that properly compacted structural fill will be placed adjacent to the sides of the foundation. A friction coefficient of 0.4 may be used to determine the frictional resistance at the base of the mat. This coefficient includes a factor safety of approximate 1.5. FLOOR SLABS Conventional concrete floors are appropriate for at -grade structures. Concrete slab -on -grade floors should be underlain by a capillary break consisting of at least 4 inches of compacted 3/4 - inch, clean crushed rock (less than 3 percent fines) placed on compacted subgrade soil. The capillary break material should also have no more than 10 percent passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 5 percent by weight of the material passing the U.S. Standard No. 100 sieve. The 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 7 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 capillary break should be placed on a subgrade that has been compacted to a dense and unyielding condition. A 10 -mil polyethylene vapor barrier should also be placed directly below the slab. We also recommend that construction joints be incorporated into the floor slab to control cracking. BELOW -GRADE CONCRETE WALLS We understand that the buried portion of the tower structure (Plenum Chamber) will be designed as a water -tight structure. As such, the below -grade walls for the tower structure should be properly designed to resist the lateral earth pressures and hydrostatic pressures behind the wall. Our geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the below -grade walls are presented below. Lateral Earth Pressures — Below -grade concrete walls for the tower structure should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures due to the adjacent soil, surcharges, and hydrostatic pressures. Lateral pressures will depend upon the inclination of the back -slope, degree of . wall restraint, type of backfill, method of backfill placement, degree of backfill compaction, drainage provisions, and magnitude and location of any surcharge loads. A design groundwater level of 13 feet should be used in the design. The below -grade concrete walls should be designed for the following lateral (equivalent fluid) pressures: • At rest conditions above water table 45 pcf • At rest conditions below water table 21 pcf • Active conditions above water table: 35 pcf • Active conditions below water table: 17 pcf • Hydrostatic pressure: 62.4 pcf (assume water table at 13') Dynamic lateral earth pressures due to seismic loading may be estimated using 6H psf (rectangular pressure distribution) for level backfill, where H is the height of the wall in feet. The dynamic lateral earth pressures are in addition to the static lateral earth pressures. Surcharge — Surcharge loads, where present, should also be included in the design of retaining walls. We recommend that a lateral load coefficient of 0.3 be used to compute the lateral pressure on the wall face resulting from surcharge loads located within a horizontal distance of one-half wall height. Lateral Resistance — Lateral forces from wind or unbalanced lateral earth pressures may be resisted by a combination of passive earth pressures acting against the embedded portions of 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 8 PanGEO, Inc. Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 the foundations and by friction acting on the base of the foundations. Passive resistance values may be determined using the following values. • Passive conditions above water table: • Passive conditions below water table: 350 pcf (allowable) 200 pcf (allowable) The resistance values include a factor of safety of 1.5, assuming that the structural fill adjacent to the sides of the footing has been compacted. A friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used to determine the frictional resistance at the base of the footings. This coefficient includes a factor safety of approximate 1.5. Water Proofing — The exterior of the below -grade walls of the tower structure should be protected with a water proofing compound. A building waterproofing specialist should be consulted for additional input regarding this matter. Wall Backfill — The existing on-site soil may be re -used as wall backfill provided they can be compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density. If on-site sol cannot be compacted to the required density, imported, well -graded granular material should be used as wall backfill. Wall backfill should be moisture conditioned, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 8 inches in thickness, and systematically compacted to a dense and relatively unyielding condition. Within 5 feet of the walls, we recommend using small equipment such as plate wackers for fill compaction, to prevent damage to the concrete wall. In the area where the space is limited between the wall and the face of excavation, pea gravel may be used without compaction. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS MATERIAL REUSE The on-site soil may be re -used as fill and backfill provided they can be compacted to a dense and unyielding condition. If on-site soil cannot be compacted to a dense and unyielding condition, imported, well -graded, granular material, such as Gravel Borrow (WSDOT 9- 03.14(1)) should be used as backfill. STRUCTURAL FILL COMPACTION Structural fill should be moisture conditioned to within about 3 percent of optimum moisture content, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 8 inches in thickness, and systematically compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined using test method ASTM D 1557. Depending on the type of compaction equipment used and depending on the type of fill material, it may be necessary to decrease the thickness of each lift in order to achieve adequate 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 9 PanGEO, Inc. Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 compaction. PanGEO can provide additional recommendations regarding structural fill and compaction during construction. WET SEASON CONSTRUCTION AND EROSION CONTROL In our opinion, the proposed site construction may be accomplished during wet weather (such as in winter) without adversely affecting the site stability. However, foundation construction of the tower structure in the winter months will encounter higher groundwater level and will require more construction dewatering. Generally, earthwork construction performed during the drier summer months likely will be more economical. Winter construction will also require the implementation of best management erosion and sedimentation control practices to reduce the chance of off-site sediment transport. Some of the site soils contain a high percentage of fines and are moisture sensitive. Any footing subgrade soils that become softened either by disturbance or rainfall should be removed and replaced with crushed rock, Controlled Density Fill (CDF), or lean -mix concrete, as determined by the geotechnical engineer depending on the actual site conditions. General recommendations relative to earthwork performed in wet conditions are presented below: • Site stripping, excavation and subgrade preparation should be followed promptly by the placement and compaction of clean structural fill or CDF; • The size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to prevent soil disturbance; • The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-off of surface water and to prevent the ponding of water; • Bales of straw and/or geotextile silt fences should be strategically located to control erosion and the movement of soil; • Structural fill should consist of less than 5% fines; and • Excavation slopes should be covered with plastic sheets. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface runoff can be controlled during construction by careful grading practices. Typically, this includes the construction of shallow, upgrade perimeter ditches or low earthen berms to collect runoff and prevent water from entering the excavation. All collected water should be directed under control to a positive and permanent discharge system such as a storm sewer. Permanent control of surface water should be incorporated in the final grading design. Adequate surface gradients and drainage systems should be incorporated into the design such that surface runoff is directed away from structures and top of slope. Water should not be discharged over the top of the slope. 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 10 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 Potential problems associated with erosion may also be minimized by establishing vegetation within disturbed areas immediately following grading operations. Vegetation with deep penetrating roots is the preferred choice, since the roots tend to maintain the surficial stability of slopes by mechanical effects and contribute to the drying of slopes by evapo-transpiration. ADDITIONAL SERVICES To confirm that our recommendations are properly incorporated into the design and construction of the development, PanGEO should conduct a review of the final project plans and specifications, and perform a field -monitoring program during construction. Specifically, we anticipate that the following additional services may be needed: • Review final project plans and specifications • Verify implementation of erosion control measures • Monitor temporary excavation and shoring • Verify footing subgrade conditions • Confirm the adequacy of the compaction of structural backfill • Other consultation as may be required during construction Modifications to our recommendations presented in this report may be necessary, based on the actual conditions encountered during construction. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Rotorway International and the project team. Recommendations contained in this report are based on a site reconnaissance, a subsurface exploration program, review of pertinent subsurface information, and our understanding of the project. The study was performed using a mutually agreed-upon scope of work. Variations in soil conditions may exist between the locations of the explorations and the actual conditions underlying the site. The nature and extent of soil variations may not be evident until construction occurs. If any soil conditions are encountered at the site that are different from those described in this report, we should be notified immediately to review the applicability of our recommendations. Additionally, we should also be notified to review the applicability of our recommendations if there are any changes in the project scope. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions. Our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Additionally, the scope of our work specifically excludes the assessment of environmental characteristics, particularly those involving hazardous substances. We are not mold consultants 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 11 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 nor are our recommendations to be interpreted as being preventative of mold development. A mold specialist should be consulted for all mold -related issues. This report may be used only by the client and for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both off and on-site), or other factors including advances in our understanding of applied science, may change over time and could materially affect our findings. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after 24 months from its issuance. PanGEO should be notified if the project is delayed by more than 24 months from the date of this report so that we may review the applicability of our conclusions considering the time lapse. It is the client's responsibility to see that all parties to this project, including the designer, contractor, subcontractors, etc., are made aware of this report in its entirety. The use of information contained in this report for bidding purposes should be done at the contractor's option and risk. Any party other than the client who wishes to use this report shall notify PanGEO of such intended use and for permission to copy this report. Based on the intended use of the report, PanGEO may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report be reissued. Noncompliance with any of these requirements will release PanGEO from any liability resulting from the use this report. Within the limitation of scope, schedule and budget, PanGEO engages in the practice of geotechnical engineering and endeavors to perform its services in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices at the time the Report or its contents were prepared. No warranty, express or implied, is made. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, H. Michael Xue, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 12 Siew L. Tan, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer PanGEO, Inc. • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 • Attachments: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site and Exploration Plan Figure 3 Log of CPT -01 Figure 4 Log of CPT -02 Figure 5 Log of Test Boring BH -1 Appendix Previous summary Boring Log by Earth Consultant, Inc. (1985) 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 13 PanGEO, Inc. • • Mr. Bill Adams Proposed U -Fly Seattle, Tukwila, WA December 23, 2009 REFERENCES Booth, D.B., Waldron, H.H. and Troost, K.G. (2004), Geologic Map of the Des Moines 7.5' Quadrangle, King County, Washington, scale 1:24,000 Earth Consultant Inc., (1985), Geotechnical Engineering Study, Abbott Laboratories Building, Andover Park West & Tukwila Parkway, Tukwila, Washington. International Building Code (2006). WSDOT, (2008). Standard Specifications for Road, Bridges, and Municipal Construction. 09-145 U -Fly Seattle Rpt.doc Page 14 PanGEO, Inc. vicin it Approx. Scale: 1 in -- 750 feet JL Gal G I N C O R P O R A T E D U-FIy Seattle 301 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila, Washington Project No 09-145 VICINITY MAP Figure No • • .n�..gH w/ 1.. r;: 1 12/23/09 (9:21 ) MHX —Nr -- I I TUKWILA PARKWAY (5. 15tbth Inc 1) 401.04' TT17777 rvor0SeD ween or WORK— s CPT -02 J t 1 I I 1 1 EXISTING BUILDING +27.05' (1)(15H1).00?, —4 4— Note: Base map modified from Site Plan by Jensen Fey Architecture & Planning, dated 11/23/2009. Legend: 4 -CPT -01 Approx. CPT Location BH -1 Approx. Boring Location B-1 Approx. ECI Boring Location Approx. Scale 1"=50' PanGE® U -Fly Seattle 301 Tukwila Parkkway Seattle, Washington SITE AND EXPLORATION MAP Project No. Figure No. 09-145 2 File.ppl 12/23/2009(10:12 AM) NER 0 0 10 20 Depth 30 (n) 40 Tip Resistance Ot TSF 50 ? r • 1 • PanGEO Inc. Operator. Brown Sounding: CPT -01 Cone Used: DSG1079 250 CPT Date/Time: 1115/2009 8:48:37 AM Location: U -Fly Seattle 301 Tukwila Parkway Job Number: 09-145 Friction Ratio Pore Pressure Fs/Ot (%) Pr/ PSI 0 5 -20 60 1.�._r_Li=3 711-1-117 ,- - 1-1ITl- - 1 to-- 1 I `'= -tea Maximum Depth 59.06 feet -1- 1. Sal Behavior Type' Zone: UBC -1983 0 12 111111- 111111 111iT 111 '111r 111111 III Depth Increment= 0.164 feet SPT N' 60% Hammer 0 50 -t-I-,:n iTT 1' 1 11 11 .S 1 I 11 1 i I,IJi"I 1 4.1_.1:4_ 1 1 1'1 Czfti 1'- I I t: I I "\ ;• 1. 1 11 it .1 11 11 1 L 1 sensitive fine grained ■ 4 silly clay to day ! 7 silty sand to sandy silt V1 10 gravelly send to sand • 2 organic material a 5 dayey silt to silty day C 8 sand to silty sand • 11 very stiff fine grained (') 13 clay ■ 6 sandy silt to clayey silt L. 9 sand 112 sand to clayey sand (') 'Sal bGMvlor bpo and Sr I beatd on data born 1113C•19H1 In Set' hn9lnnlmn0 U -Fly Seattle Tukwila Pkwy & Andover Park W Tukwila, Washington LOG OF CPT - 01 Project No. 09-145 Figure No. 3 le.ppl 12/23/2009(10:12AM) NER PanGEO Inc. Operator. &own Sounding: CPT -02 Cone Used: DSG1079 Tip Resistance Friction Ratio Ot TSF FslOt (%) 0 250 0 5 0 10 20 Depth 30 191 40 50 60 `.yam ---lav , 1 CPT Date!Time: 1115!2009 11:08:17 AM Location: U -Fly Seattle 301 Tukwila Parkway Job Number: 09-145 Pore Pressure Pw PSI -5 20 1 I , J I 1 11 Soil Behavior Type' Zone: UBC -1983 SPT N' 60% Hammer Trroil, 1 -r 1 1 „ 41‘ II 111 11 11 wawa 11 11 ;Ilii i 11 li 111111 1111 11 11 J111IL. ;; 11 -1111 11 11 11 111 11 11 1 11 11 a 111111 1 1 -1 1.-IIi111 111115, 1 1 . 4 144 11 111111; 11 11 I/1111111 111111111 111 11111 11 111 1111 11111 11,11 i 1 11111 1111111111 1 1, I. 1 1.1 1 11 111111111 11111111/11 L • • 1 I1 11 11 Maximum Depth = 50.03 feet Depth Increment = 0.164 feet 1 sensitive tine grained 14 silty clay to clay • 7 silty sand to sandy silt gi 10 gravelly sand to sand • 2 organic material • 6 clayey sill to silty clay F. 8 sand to silty sand • 11 very stiff fine grained (') • 3 clay a 6 sandy sill to clayey sill [:, 9 sand • 12 Sand to clayey sand (') .54I blhsviw N111.1 &IJ SP1 based oh data tr,m UBC•1983 In Sao Eng,nonnna PanGE® INCORPOR ATED U -Fly Seattle Tukwila Pkwy & Andover Park W Tukwila, Washington LOG OF CPT - 02 Project No. 09-145 Figure No. 4 • • Project: U -Fly Seattle Job Number: 09-145 Location: Tukwila, Washington Coordinates: Northing: , Easting: Surface Elevation: Top of Casing Elev.: N/A Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger Sampling Method: SPT a) 10- -12- -14- S-1 S-2 -3 - 16 - S-4 0 x LOG OF BO Blows / 6 in. 30 50/6 5 8 18 5 10 31 11 11 28 50/6 Other Tests Completion Depth: Date Borehole Started: Date Borehole Completed: Logged By: Drilling Company: E MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Approximate 5 -inch concrete slab. Hard, gray -brown, SILT to clayey SILT, trace sand and some crushed rock, moist (FILL). Very stiff, light gray -gray, clayey SILT/silty CLAY, trace sand and gravel, very moist. Hard, gray, clayey SILT interbedded with silty fine SAND, little gravel, very moist. Hard, gray -brown, SILT with some fine sand to sandy SILT, moist, 3 -inch thick gray, fine sand layer at the bottom of sampler. Bottom of Boring at about 17 feet below the existing building floor. Boring was converted to a groundwater monitoring well. Groundwater was measured at about 15 feet on December 8 and 16, 2009. 17.0ft 12/1/09 12/1 /09 MHX CN Drilling N -Value • PL Moisture LL • RQD 50 Recovery 100 c a) E 2 0 c 3/7//"/3/7//i" AA Remarks: Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler driven with a 140 Ib. safety hammer. Hammer operated with an rope and cathead mechanism. PanGE® INCORPORATED Phone: 206.262.0370 LOG OF TEST BORING BH -1 The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Figure 5 Sheet 1 of 1 • i APPENDIX A PREVIOUS SUMMARY BORING LOG BY EARTH CONSULTANT INC (1985) BORING NO. _i____. Logged By .714.3 ELEV 26± Date 2/8/85 Graph US Soil Description D(eftp'h Sample (N) Blows Ft. W (%) ❖••;••�• • 444,44• •••••••••• •••• •••••• = mi gray rusty mottled sandy SILT with gravel and cobbles or rubble, moist, medium dense (FILL) ' - —5 = 85 I S = = I = 1 I = I 15 7 4 9 14 18 10 10 4 5 25 27 . 20 28 70 27 17=2.0-3.5 78 123 32 38 30 11 14 13 qu=1.0 tsf qu=.5 tsf LL=61,PI=18 2.25tsf tsf qu=.5 tsf [24-63,P1=1020 -63,PI=10 qu=2.75tsf JL MH gray clayey SILT with peat layers, woody, wet, soft to medium stiff710 (stiff to very stiff at 11') - sm ml gray clayey SILT mixed with silty sand with gravel, moist, medium dense, low y]astirity fhard'dri114ng1 :2118 _ 15 f - _ - 1 MH brownish clayey SILT with organics, wet1p soft to medium stiff )1t I 1 ml gray clayey SILT, moist, very stiff lf, i_l. of brown organic SILT layered with PEAT, woody, wet, stiff _ 25 _ 30 - - - 35 - - 40 ';31 • <` . ,' ••�' pt . ca brown sandy SILT with gray silty sand layers, wet, loose to medium dense, non-„ plastic grayish SILT with sand, wet, loose, non-plastic gray silty SAND w/sandy silt lenses w/ shell fragments, wet. loose ••• •:t• •-•• •.i.i • •t' i - :t::t: ••••i ••••i • :9:;t. .t• -i•i t• • ! • . gp ' gray sandy GRAVEL with shell fragments, wet, medium dense _ --45 - _ 50 -36 Boring terminated at 54' below existing grade. Groundwater encountered at 12.5' during drilling. 3/4" PVC standpipe installed to bottom of boring. Lower 15' slotted. Boring backfilled with cuttings. Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • 4/ a GEOLOGY ' BORING LOG ABBOTT LAB ADDITION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 2555 1 Date Feb.'85 'Plate 4 T eetg Of Community AFFIDAVIT r, o f JWiwi& \ kDepartment Deve 4ment OF DISTRIBtTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non -Significance Project Name: I -Fly Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: E10-018 Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailing requested by: Brandon Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Mailer's signature: Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice K/2e-0./-,- Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application SEPA DETERMINATION Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _5 day of _October in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: I -Fly Project Number: E10-018 Mailing requested by: Brandon iles4 Mailer's signature: / K/2e-0./-,- W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of Application I -Fly SEPA determination Location: 301 Tukwila Parkway File #'s: E10-018 (SEPA) Applicant: David Fey for I -Fly Property Owner: BETA Holdings Project Planner: Brandon Miles, 206-431-3684 Project Description: Construction of an indoor skydiving operation. The applicant is proposing to cut 2100 cubic yards of soil on the site to construct the foundation for the new building. The proposed cut exceeds the threshold ex- emption levels and an environmental review is required. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environ- mental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non- significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197- 11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environ- mental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not iden- tify probable significant adverse impacts that were not consid- ered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. Comments and Appeals: Your written comments on the pro- ject are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcen- ter Blvd., Ste 100 Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on October 20, 2010. You may request a copy of any decision, infor- mation on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. • c E10-018 I FLY NOA 44 addresses OWNER_NAME ACME -MANAGER QDOBA - MANAGER UPS -MANAGER SUSHILAND - MANAGER SPRINT - MANAGER LOWES HIW INC WEA SOUTHCENTER LLC CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER BETA HOLDINGS LTD TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER RAINBOW ASSOCIATES LTD TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER LA FITNESS TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER ROYAL COACHMAN ASSOCIATES LLC KC HOUSING AUTHORITY TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER OWNER_ADDRESS 100 ANDOVER PARK W 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #130 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #150 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #160 100 ANDOVER PARK W - Ste B 101 ANDOVER PARK E 200 11601 WILSHIRE BLVD 150 ANDOVER PARK W 15455 65TH AVE S 18827 BOTHELL WAY NE 225 TUKWILA PKWY 22820 148TH AVE SE 301 TUKWILA PKWY 313 TUKWILA PKWY 319 TUKWILA PKWY 321 TUKWILA PKWY 325 TUKWILA PKWY 327 TUKWILA PKWY 331 TUKWILA PKWY 339 TUKWILA PKWY 341 TUKWILA PKWY 345 TUKWILA PKWY 349 TUKWILA PKWY 350 BAKER BLVD 401 EVANS BLACK DR 401 TUKWILA PKWY 406 EVANS BLACK DR 415 BAKER BLVD 200 600 ANDOVER PARK W 6400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD OWNER_CITY OWNER_STATE OWNER_ZIP TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 BOTHELL TUKWILA KENT TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA SEATTLE TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA 98011 98188 98042 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER SCHNEIDER,GERALD E 15523 TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER MSI 6400 TUKWILA TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER SEATTLE CITY OF BANK OF AMERICA OPEN FRAME LLC SOUTHCENTER MALL MANAGEMENT SEAFOOD CITY MARKET - MANAGER 70 ANDOVER PARK W 7517 GREENWOOD AVE N 80 ANDOVER PARK W 83 S KING ST 606 90 ANDOVER PARK W PO BOX 34018 PO BOX 34029 PO BOX 88198 2800 SOUTHCENTER MALL 1368 SOUTHCENTER MALL TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA 98188 98103 98188 98104 98188 98124 98124 98138 98188 98188 • • N -L (0 AGENCY LABELS tvi K R ( ) US -Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( )US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Archaeology Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services N i ( ) tion D.epattment (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development N(.WA Fisheries & Wildlife eral ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ffice, Shoreland Division ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation \ KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light Puget Sound Energy ( ) Ilithline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept Comcast Se on 5 UTILITIES BP Olympic Pipeline ( )dal-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien City of Seattle Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce NM - .e* ) is - - •rogram ( ) Wildlife Program Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits • SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECTANFORMATION I -Fly is proposing to construct of an indoor skydiving operation. The applicant is proposing to cut 2100 cubic yards of soil on the site to construct the foundation for the new building. The proposed grading activities exceed the threshold exemption levels and an environmental review is required. Projects applied for include: Environmental Review, E10-018; Design Review, L10-048 (Already approved by the Board of Architectural Review); and Sign Permit, S10-047 Other known required permits include: Studies required with the applications include: Building Permit Public Work Permit (Land Altering) Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Permits Geotechnical Engineering Study and Temporary Shoring Design Recommendations An environmental checklist has been submitted with the study identified above. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC'REMIE11 The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. a.� w:�, OPPOR ITYREOR}PUBLIC EOMMENT „ Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., October 20, 2010. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. The appeal period for the approved design review application has concluded. A building permit maybe appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner. There is no administrative appeal permitted for the Public Works permit. For further information on this proposal, contact Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: September 29, 2010 Notice of Completeness Issued: October 1, 2010 Notice of Application Issued: October 6, 2010 vir �� city of J u1 LI/mita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION i, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non -Significance Project Name: I -Fly- David Fey Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Project Number: L10-045 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Mailer's signature: /) /M k // Planning Commission Agenda Packet 1 Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda X Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 29 day of July in the year 20 10_ W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: I -Fly- David Fey Project Number: L10-045 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: /) /M k // 1 fi 1 /( W:\USERS\TERI\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of Application I -FLY Public Hearing Design Review Location: 301 Tukwila Pkwy, King County Parcel 4022300- 0010 z 1 Ty uubabutmenuelimaimmemiliiiwotittiloo Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner, (206) 431- 3684 or bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Project Description: I -FLY is proposing to renovate an exist- ing building to house an indoor sky diving operation. Portions of the existing building will be demolished and a new 8,000 square foot addition will be constructed. The proposing addi- tion will be 70 feet tall and have the appearance of a wind tower. File #'s L10-045 Applicant:David Fey with Jensen Fey Architecture Property Owners: Beta Holding LTD Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd # 100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Com- ments must be received by 5:OOpm on August 12, 2010 You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. A public hearing has tentatively been scheduled for August 26, 2010. You will receive a separate notice for the public hearing. City of Tukwila Notice of Application I -FLY Public Hearing Design Review Location: 301 Tukwila Pkwy, King County Parcel #022300- 0010 File #'s L10-045 Applicant:David Fey with Jensen Fey Architecture Property Owners: Beta Holding LTD Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner, (206) 431- 3684 or bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Project Description: I -FLY is proposing to renovate an exist- ing building to house an indoor sky diving operation. Portions of the existing building will be demolished and a new 8,000 square foot addition will be constructed. The proposing addi- tion will be 70 feet tall and have the appearance of a wind tower. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Com- ments must be received by 5:OOpm on August 12, 2010 You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. A public hearing has tentatively been scheduled for August 26, 2010. You will receive a separate notice for the public hearing. City of Tukwila Notice of Application I -FLY Public Hearing Design Review Location: 301 Tukwila Pkwy, King County Parcel #022300- 0010 File #'s L10-045 Applicant:David Fey with Jensen Fey Architecture Property Owners: Beta Holding LTD Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner, (206) 431- 3684 or bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Project Description: I -FLY is proposing to renovate an exist- ing building to house an indoor sky diving operation. Portions of the existing building will be demolished and a new 8,000 square foot addition will be constructed. The proposing addi- tion will be 70 feet tall and have the appearance of a wind tower. Comments and Appeals: The application is available f -'iew at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Dev tent (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Com- ments must be received by 5:OOpm on August 12, 2010 You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. A public hearing has tentatively been scheduled for August 26, 2010. You will receive a separate notice for the public hearing. City of Tukwila Notice of Application I -FLY Public Hearing Design Review Location: 301 Tukwila Pkwy, King County Parcel #022300- 0010 I-40 File #'s L10-045 Applicant:David Fey with Jensen Fey Architecture Property Owners: Beta Holding LTD Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner, (206) 431- 3684 or bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Project Description: I -FLY is proposing to renovate an exist- ing building to house an indoor sky diving operation. Portions of the existing building will be demolished and a new 8,000 square foot addition will be constructed. The proposing addi- tion will be 70 feet tall and have the appearance of a wind tower. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Com- ments must be received by 5:OOpm on August 12, 2010 You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206433-7166. A public hearing has tentatively been scheduled for August 26, 2010. You will receive a separate notice for the public hearing. L10-045 I -Fly OWNER_NAME ACME -MANAGER QDOBA - MANAGER UPS -MANAGER SUSHILAND - MANAGER SPRINT - MANAGER LOWES HIW INC WEA SOUTHCENTER LLC CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER BETA HOLDINGS LTD TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER RAINBOW ASSOCIATES LTD TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER LA FITNESS TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER ROYAL COACHMAN ASSOCIATES LLC KC HOUSING AUTHORITY TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER SCHNEIDER,GERALD E 15523 TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER MSI 6400 TUKWILA TUKWILA BUSINESS MEMBER SEATTLE CITY OF BANK OF AMERICA OPEN FRAME LLC SOUTHCENTER MALL MANAGEMENT SEAFOOD CITY MARKET - MANAGER OWNER_ADDRESS 100 ANDOVER PARK W 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #130 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #150 100 ANDOVER PARK W - #160 100 ANDOVER PARK W - Ste B 101 ANDOVER PARK E 200 11601 WILSHIRE BLVD 150 ANDOVER PARK W 15455 65TH AVE S 18827 BOTHELL WAY NE 225 TUKWILA PKWY 22820 148TH AVE SE 301 TUKWILA PKWY 313 TUKWILA PKWY 319 TUKWILA PKWY 321 TUKWILA PKWY 325 TUKWILA PKWY 327 TUKWILA PKWY 331 TUKWILA PKWY 339 TUKWILA PKWY 341 TUKWILA PKWY 345 TUKWILA PKWY 349 TUKWILA PKWY 350 BAKER BLVD 401 EVANS BLACK DR 401 TUKWILA PKWY 406 EVANS BLACK DR 415 BAKER BLVD 200 600 ANDOVER PARK W 6400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 70 ANDOVER PARK W 7517 GREENWOOD AVE N 80 ANDOVER PARK W 83 S KING ST 606 90 ANDOVER PARK W PO BOX 34018 PO BOX 34029 PO BOX 88198 2800 SOUTHCENTER MALL 1368 SOUTHCENTER MALL OWNER_CITY OWNER_STATE OWNER_ZIP TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 BOTHELL WA 98011 TUKWILA WA 98188 KENT WA 98042 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATTLE WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATTLE WA 98103 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATTLE WA 98104 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATTLE WA 98124 SEATTLE WA 98124 TUKWILA WA 98138 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish &,Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( )US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service c Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division Dept of Ecology, SEPA (N Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div �) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation %KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library QWEST Communications (�teattle City Light v&Puget Sound Energy (�I'iighline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section SAUTILITIES ` . BP Olympic Pipeline OVal-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments Fire ( )-Finance ( ) Building ( ) Mayor ( ) Public Works ( ) Police ( ) Planning ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITa' AGENCIES Vent Planning Dept O'Renton Planning Dept `� ► ity of SeaTac ( City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number p-oLfC"- LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: k,Building U Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. n Parks/Rec Project: j -NA 015iii 040J Update date: • Address: Date transmitted: , —It 1 t1( 0 Response requested by: Q (]5/1 StaffA coordinator: t', J 1.II t` Date response received: r REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: TO: • • Development Review Supplemental Memorandum Public Works Development Review Staff Fire Development Review Staff Building Development Review FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner DATE: July 16, 2010 RE: I -Fly Design Review PL10-036, L10-045 Project Description Design review application for construction of a building addition at 301 Tukwila Pkwy. Given certain construction issues the applicant is hoping to break ground in September if possible. This has tentatively been scheduled to go before the BAR on August 26th. A building permit application will submitted as soon as staff is satisfied with the proposed design of the building. Notes to Development Review Team o Please provide any comments by August 4, 2010 regarding the proposed project. This maybe your only opportunity to review or provide comments on this project. Please list any additional permits or requirements that you Department may impose on the project. Any condition should be supported by applicable code citations. o Remember to track you time to permits plus. Thanks. • • Design Narrative Project Name: I -FLY Indoor Skydiving Site context The site is situated in the heart of shopping district. It is bordered by Westfield Southcenter Shopping mall to the west, I-405 major freeway to the north, newly built Lowe's to the east, and Acme Bowl bowling center to the south. About a half of mile to the northeast, Family Fun Center is sharing a similar nature of business type with i -Fly catering as "fun place" for the whole family. Existing single story strip mall was built in the late 1980's with economical building materials such as simple metal skeleton on "slab on grade" in -filled with bricks and stucco around storefront glazing. The building is showing its age and its existing design characteristic is apart from the newly designed surroundings. Building design i -FLY Indoor Skydiving will be a new landmark towering over 70 feet will be predominantly visible from motorist on I-405 freeway. It will be another iconic building in the Sounthcenter mall district adding more vibrant character to the retail district. New 8,000 SF of i -FLY project will be dissecting the existing building by occupying the middle portion of the building. This allows a unique opportunity for integrating the new construction with existing building. Thus the main design concept of one integrated seamless building with new updated look for the existing portion of the retail area to raise the value of not only for its site, but also for the value of the surroundings as well. There are three portions within the project. The main one is the 70 feet tall wind tower sandwiched by new retail space to the east and, main entrance/lobby building to the west of the tower. These adjacent functions will act as a "transitional" space from the existing one to new one for both functionally and esthetically. The look of the wind tower derived from a rather functional one from the virtue of wind circulation within the tower. Its skin cladding of corrugated metal panels also is a practical one which honors industrial nature. The same corrugated panels will also be used for the rest of existing building to give design continuity with the tower. Another notable improvement that i -FLY brings to the site is a further enhancement of integration with immediate surrounding respecting the "pedestrian friendly design" and a "better street -edge design". This notion is particularly evident on the north facade of the mall facing I-405 freeway which is currently functioning as a service side for the strip mall. Majority of the facade is currently edged with harsh brick walls with occasional storefronts with unorganized store signage. This north facade is mostly unprotected from the weather and the pathway in front of storefront is narrow and disconnected by randomly located landscape patches. New design will treat this north facade as a front/ main facade by employment of more of new storefronts and weather protections. The blank brick walls will be screened by landscapes. Also the facade will be well lit at night to further promote pedestrian activity as well as more street presence from the freeway. The pedestrian pathway will be continuous without obstructive elements. The new north facade will be a pedestrian friendly and representative one for the new mall. Signage Currently, existing signs for the various tenants are mounted on the wall above existing canopy. Various signs are not regulated in terms of their size. Also, location of signs is such that it is rather hard for shoppers to see since it's blocked by the metal canopy. The new signs for the new future tenants shall be mounted on top of the canopy. Also, size of signs shall be regulated to give continuity. For the i -FLY, City of Tukwila limits number of maximum signage to two signage per store, therefore, the location of signage should be located on the north and west side of tower for maximum visibility from the freeway. RECEIVED City of Tukwila JUL 16[010 Department of Community Development TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM File Number o.-soL{S TO: kBuilding n Planning Public Works Police Dept. IDI Parks/Rec Project: —ii Update date: 7Z8/Zola prepared by: 0 g4A.,�� Address: .7.1 Ir t,"L;L e'z.v1 Date transmitted: 1 i (4l _9 Response requested by: 2' 5 I StaffDate coordinator: 1� A"A� l+lt'1 response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 5t_ vierx) See, azacALGI j,,,.Q,., (2oto PFJ Plan check date:/Comments Update date: 7Z8/Zola prepared by: 0 g4A.,�� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: July 28, 2010 PROJECT: I -Fly Design Review 301 Tukwila Pkwy PERMIT NO: L10-045 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer (206) 431-2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) The domestic water Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly (RPPA) shall be installed immediately downstream of the domestic water meter in a freeze protection enclosure anchored into a minimum 4" concrete pad. Even with the new electrical transformer Public Works feels that there is adequate space in the landscape area to accommodate installation of the required RPPA in a freeze protection enclosure. RPPA installation in a different location (plan sheet C5 of 5, Utility Note 1 calls for installation inside the building) requires Public Works Director approval. Applicant shall call Mr. Mike Cusick, P.E., Public Works Senior Water and Sewer Engineer directly at 206 431-2441 to discuss this issue. 2) Applicant shall submit Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application to Public Works and pay the $4,050 application fee (Gross Floor Area between 5,001 and 10,000 sq ft, Non -Residential Use is classified as Retail and Recreation) (W:PW Eng/Other/Joanna Spencer/comments 1 L10-045) CITY OF TUKWILA Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenfer Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 http://www.cLtukwila.wa.us Permit No. Project No. (For office use only) TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. **Please Print** SITE LOCATION Site Address: Tenant Name: Property Owners Name: Mailing Address: King Co. Assessor's Tax No.: Suite Number: Type of Existing Use: Is existing building vacant? City Size of Existing Use: For how long? • State Zip CONTACT PERSON -- Who do we contact when your concurrency certificate is ready to be issued Name: Day Telephone: Mailing Address: state City E -Mail Address: Fax Number: Zip Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Type of work: ❑ New ❑ Addition ❑ Change of use Type of Proposed Use: 0 Remodel Size of Proposed Use: 0 Tenant Improvement PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES - Expiration — The concurrency test notice shall expire 90 days after issuance unless the applicant submits a SEPA or other documentation pursuant to TMC 21.04. If the submittal is made within 90 days, the test notice shall be valid for one calendar year from the date of issuance of the notice. Once the associated development permit or building permit is approved, the final concurrency certificate shall be valid for 2 years or as long as the developer possesses a valid building permit for the development. Extensions may be granted in accordance with TMC 9.50. Transferability — A certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land, but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. A certificate of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land use, density, and intensity described in the application for a development permit or building permit. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT [ HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT: Signature: Date: Print Name: Day Telephone: Mailing Address: City State Zip Date Application Accepted: Date Application Expires: Staff Initials: P:1Cyndy\Concurrency & Impact Feee\Tratric Concurrency Application 3.28.O7.dot Page 1 of 2 City of Tukwila Development Application Fees for Concurrency Analysis Fees for Residential Use Fees for Non -Residential Use Unit All Types of Residential' Gross Floor Area industrial 2 Office 3 Retail 4 Eatery 5 Institutional & Port 6 All Other Uses Between 1 and 3 $300 Less than 5,000 $1,000 $1,800 $2,700 $5,400 $500 $1,500 Between 4 and 5 $600 Between 5,001 and 10,000 $1,500 $2,700 $4,050 $8,100 $1,000 $2,000 Between 6 and 10 $1,200 Between 10,001 and 20,000 $2,000 $3,600 $5,400 $10,800 $1,500 $2,500 Between 11 and 15 $2,000 Between 20,001 and 30,Q00 $3,000 $5,400 $8,100 $10,800 $2,000 $2,500 Between 16 and 20 $3,500 Between 30,001 and 40,000 $4,000 $7,200 $10,800 $10,800 $2,500 $2,500 Between 21 and 25 $5,000 Between 40,001 and 50,000 $5,000 $9,000 $13,500 $10,800 $3,000 $2,500 Between 26 and 30 $6,500 Between 50,001 and 70,000 $6,000 $10,800 $16,200 $10,800 $4,000 $2,500 Between 31 and 40 $8,000 Between 70,001 and 90,000 $7,000 $12,600 $18,900 $10,800 $5,000 $2,500 Between 41 and 60 $10,000 Between 90,001 and 150,000 $8,000 $14,400 $21,600 $10,800 $6,000 $2,500 Greater than 60 $12,000 Between 150,001 and 200,000 $9,000 $16,200 $24.300 $10,800 $7,000 $2,500 Greater than 200,000 $10,000 $18,000 $24,300 $10,800 $8,000 $2,500 ' All residential uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 200-299, including single family, multi -family, mobile home parks, and shared housing 2 All industrial/agricultural uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 100-199, including light and heavy industrial, manufacturing, and warehousing 3 All office, medical, and service related uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 600-699, 700-799, and 900-999, including general office, medical facilities, and banks 4 All retail and recreation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 400-499, 800-830 and 837-899, including retail sales, rental sales, athletic clubs, and theaters 5 All food service uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 831-836, excluding accessory (stand-alone) drive-through espresso stands (or similar) under 250sf which are assessed $300 6 All institutional and transportation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 000-099 and 500-599, including schools, places of worship, day care, terminals, and transit Concurrency Application Fee TableFees Page 2 of 2 f • • City of Tukwila' Department of Community Development File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: 1Building n Planning Public Works `wo Fire.Dept. Police Dept. n Parks/Rec Project: I —' i -t. O� 0-4Vi.eJ VMS ° Update date: Address: r ii ?).3•1I t,��.*�l,, N. Date transmitted: ii �l 1 b� (') Response requested by: 3 3/1 Staff coordinator: A Pt ,16 Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and,/or support materials as needed.) Ic sLALucis b .t10 rS Stds 64, -1-7.k..-1-<-• . 2) (-9w-0o Mr•&1r)Aan;r• 0N -N juak-, 5- AFL 1/‘\ t/k-;) A uRrs , Plan ch ck ate: _ 91 to J D Comments prepared by VMS ° Update date: TO: • • Development Review Supplemental Memorandum Public Works Development Review Staff Fire Development Review Staff Building Development Review FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner DATE: July 16, 2010 RE: I -Fly Design Review PL10-036, L10-045 Project Description Design review application for construction of a building addition at 301 Tukwila Pkwy. Given certain construction issues the applicant is hoping to break ground in September if possible. This has tentatively been scheduled to go before the BAR on August 26th. A building permit application will submitted as soon as staff is satisfied with the proposed design of the building. Notes to Development Review Team o Please provide any comments by August 4, 2010 regarding the proposed project. This maybe your only opportunity to review or provide comments on this project. Please list any additional permits or requirements that you Department may impose on the project. Any condition should be supported by applicable code citations. o Remember to track you time to permits plus. Thanks. TO: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number yid 4— LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building n Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. n Parks/Rec Project: Address: Date transmitted: Staff coordinator: F il6, Q -c 4'L9 `5.31 t912)✓y -71ILj() ;k Response requested by: Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Pianning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation- required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS - (Attach additional-commerif sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 5t imero fie /2 4.1 b'1 '/%-?i/ 44) 114 •C 'fp /rH/.h,0,74ir,Y r!✓«W Plan check date: 0 7...,...oe Comments prepared by: Update date �`' City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION July 16, 2010 David Fey Jensen Fey Architecture 7730 Leary Way Redmond, WA 98052 Subject: I -Fly Design Review (L10-045) Dear Mr. Fey: Your application for Public Hearing Design review was deemed complete on July 16, 2010 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The application has tentatively been scheduled for the August 26, 2010 BAR meeting. In order to meet this date it will be important for you to respond to any comment letters issued by the City. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 431-3659. Sincerely, Bra on J. Miles Senior Planner cc. L10-045 B. Miles Page 1 H:\Developments\I-Fly\Notice of Complete, 2010.07.16.DOC 07/16/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Developme EC % HEARING 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98 88 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665lUL° 07 2010 l DESIGN E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us DCOM o NT REVIEW PUBLIC APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: - ~ P1_'( ":)(99R 514YPi V/W ei LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 30/- iAi mAr. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 02--2-0 000/ DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: A/ P/ E f J J& N Address: 7750 L A t ( Ct-Vr`f j D1 AJD � Wi4- Phone:61-25 2_1 4, "03 / 0 FAX: (.1-25) 2.1(a "032GJ E-mail: - % • 7 e emen7e' - (Q/V► Signature: P:\Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp- Date: 7/O&/t O December 4, 2006 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P -DR Planner: File Number: Li©r0 L(� Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: 171_10— 3 9 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: - ~ P1_'( ":)(99R 514YPi V/W ei LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 30/- iAi mAr. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 02--2-0 000/ DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: A/ P/ E f J J& N Address: 7750 L A t ( Ct-Vr`f j D1 AJD � Wi4- Phone:61-25 2_1 4, "03 / 0 FAX: (.1-25) 2.1(a "032GJ E-mail: - % • 7 e emen7e' - (Q/V► Signature: P:\Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp- Date: 7/O&/t O December 4, 2006 Check items submitted '.. with application Information Reed :.IIP May be waived in",unusual cases, upon approval of both'Public Works and Planning to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/pubwks/bulletins/floodcontrol.pdf for further information (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. (d) Total expected cut and fill. ' (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/pubwks/pwpermit.htm#techinfo. (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. . (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: Y. 19. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. 20. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. 21. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is recommended. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). X 22. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 23. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. P:\Forms\2009 Applications\Design Review -Public Hearing-JAN09.doc COMPLET-Jo APPLICATION CiiECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check; items submitted with application ,,Information Required :y .,May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both: Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: X • 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. X 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). X. 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17". )C 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. v /� 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: xProvide 7. Payment of a.$365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 8. Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple -family buildings-- e.g. apartrpents, condos, trailer parks --must be included see Public Notice Mailin • Labe Handout)Or you may pay the City to generate the mailing labels. See Land Use Fee Schedule under `Pu61ic Notice Mailing labels" for the fee amount. r If providing own labels King County Asses r s map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: /VA 10. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). NA 11. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. X12. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria, see application. This is your opportunity to highlight the design features of your project. !, /�{ 13. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/dcdplan.htm) for additional information. P:\Forms\ 2009, Applications\Design Review -Public Hearing-JAN09.doc Check items submitted with application Information Reed May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning ... SURVEY: K14 J� (a) The survey must include a graphic scale and north arrow. It shall be drawn with black ink in record of survey format. This shall be stamped by the surveyor. X. (b) An existing and proposed boundary and topographic survey (2 ft. contours including a minimum 20 ft. beyond the property line) with all structures, easements, encumbrances and right-of-way width. Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. (c) Existing and proposed building footprints. (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. (e) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. SITE PLAN: • 15 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". X (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. K (c) Vicinity Map with site location, does not have to be to scale. (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. X. (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. K (f) Loading and service areas. X(g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors, height and materials. X, (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50%). LANDSCAPE PLAN: 16 (a) Landscape planting plan that meets the standards at TMC 18.52 by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36". • (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: 17 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15%, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. (d) Existing and proposed building footprints. CIVIL PLANS: X_ • 18 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations P:\Forms\2009 Applications\Design Review -Public Hearing-JAN09.doc STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan(a,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I . I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at laitA rt.‘A (city), 1 /3\ (state) on Ziin 20 kC) a ,� #I vee (Print Name) 17727 3cfe.-' - CCK (fo (Address) (S142-5) ({-82. Z (Ph o Nf (Sig ature) On this day personally appeared before me LieW\5 G • ' V,ie1 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS l g DAY OF -5-6.. Notary Public State of Washington GINA R. PERKINS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES October 22, 2011 et`�-o NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the tate of Washington residing at U`Q 1[-%tr't'—\ My Commission expires on \Q REC ' gP i 01 2010 EVNITYD E OPWIE T. P:\Planning Forms \Applications\ Variance-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 20 \p } i • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan(wci.tukwila.wa.us 1. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /'FLY /AIA 2O/e V/NG, LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 491 1-0Avitt4 754xP—mq-r LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 022 3 0000/0 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: PAM' y J5(4' 4 dH/7C Address: 7736 LP—A-gay t Phon44/1 J21& .O2J' %8 FAX&'Z ) 21t!O •031. E-mail: / V1# ' aVY1 Signature: Date: 30 00`0 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Perniits Plus TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /'FLY /AIA 2O/e V/NG, LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 491 1-0Avitt4 754xP—mq-r LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 022 3 0000/0 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: PAM' y J5(4' 4 dH/7C Address: 7736 LP—A-gay t Phon44/1 J21& .O2J' %8 FAX&'Z ) 21t!O •031. E-mail: / V1# ' aVY1 Signature: Date: 30 00`0 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenier Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan a,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KiNG The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. ss EXECUTED at (city), (state), on , 20 Print Name Address Phone Number Signature On this day personally appeared before me to the known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires • City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 9/2.4%� Applicant Name: J//' AniVil5 Street Address: Ao• baX &b60. City, State, Zip: cPiWDA2 Telephone: (1-'o) 9393 • 55&-7 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. • Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. 67- Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. CP Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 /J Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged , construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. O Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 Part A (continued) City of TukwillA Screening Checklist 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. C9 Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or- sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or.sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. 6?Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 Part B (continued) 1 City of TukwilipA Screening Checklist 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stonnwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. if your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stonnwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stonnwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 . 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high watermark, of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question. 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) City of Tukwi .A Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely mean -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to City of TukwilA Screening Checklist another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) • STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: /-PLy wpivhQ4 2. Name of Applicant: h3/Lz, AV/4711 3. Date c ecklist repared: 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Pro osed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): motes • 6. o you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. /V° 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposa . Opo • 7-%C.ft - ZW /2-1./05,1 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. No o Agency Comments • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Cormnents 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 401/140/d770/C) ptiO4/T P'T Des/'? 1 , 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. ? -Keo Sr /410u770& OF `t,100 st on eshoz Slam` I is C Ilk Ct 'RU7l4U Await sAtio,vCI C 4Yl %45llf /Kki 7c 'mLE., 33"w1, , 44 of /O I Z -DM. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. if a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. .4s 77/5 Atquc, oity 1=xeuEer ®'" l is ofr Ille vIt&i 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? /vo • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: PG,err,/1C, nl. Agency Comments b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. / DJ 55'/7E Ci `7-02 o f ve/S 4a/iv' bPc $/T 5 . f�I. 'o3 E&irvAiWic 13A am/7 /5 f ! /44 R/A1-• • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstablesoils in the immediate vicinity? If,�g„describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. eXeni/4/' J f}S54G/fl7 Ga1157T�'U LTT 611 df 4sem ,07' pz..euVM Ag v #i x 3-11(1 x /7(D. (4" 2./ /49 6L, cies) • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? g. If so, enerall describe. 'OS♦C/7o(J7D/I rG� _A'UM'OaJ 15 A 50LP• ,OW b7 /=iZtiiooS About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? „tx t1 1 .r 'jl/L4 Ler /5Lirik. JS fsl/rJf tat AF_Avvit3. Atub h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: i&vl/'o .Y mos/CA i CONTROL I 7loA 9 Zola. /ti�ra4 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. n id /u7vt-/79- 440tD A -7 o4 b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Nave. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: cans vc oli H't Vt77 3 (tom , 5vezi -7" 7V 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that wouid affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. %f'0"1". 1 itve,MS 4RookaD6ve1 A 1lu� /5' i— r W r LOV L-- . Z 4 'MAY C d() riValOC De. 17 Ar ,4 (/OarnE /6' t*trt... 1-'/K /1WOUTE /s eal5C7 r )(15,1-4) L-77/2 401-r ,//20, o . Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including store water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? if so, describe. on6/DS 6940 ,no 717 6/7,e5MAell 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? if so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: d /3,--0 1,11 Ler CML I Ajvk afra ViO5 , 44776 Co/ f yt fit • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A455 6v01.E. P isr_410 V6,6 Itriqn, Aff.iftc.E.1)Go/ hf.x, At wr7'/— • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Aroio d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: f4ria7lo/J4tA t / V&//5 577r 7' �vlu- G�1 /[,L - - ♦ flitDVN� Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs XGrass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A455 6v01.E. P isr_410 V6,6 Itriqn, Aff.iftc.E.1)Go/ hf.x, At wr7'/— • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Aroio d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: f4ria7lo/J4tA t / V&//5 577r 7' �vlu- G�1 /[,L - - ♦ flitDVN� Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Atogg c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Nor Ilu011e d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: "tome 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ?Z' J 5"el7CX19 Uv 1.e4 -1A CiTy P6 i()Ei 7-f/ . alVDOTOAVA4 c Gulc.c- P• fJAVi- cls . Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. wlct / Rom) /1)/ T b 5/-M• c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this pro sal? 7s/ r pro osed�asto reduceor c tr91 enemy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Noiv 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? -- % �✓ tgacyUT 0 77e. /41x54 `9 !� 4ve No ApVrAse e ar no NE frft&f&r. Agency Comments 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 7-1/ r iv!N 711) JJL NOISE, / A�Io LG�,�G� OAIM. [ %' 7-1/M / / fd.� �//w ,r / / (/ / V©IS 71.1A i DOTS! 7 v i /'ECS. 7 S✓oMBetr5t.,. �� see � � re /He 117 h,,1 t' NolsE (..01/5 • 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 7� PRO.P ECT' ru, /-e/97Mr ,rR044 Re AA/W u [tis4u � Tftt �t4iai 3 a>es fsvuAAosr) ,SY pil2iefidy cars Akio 7if, LvvrcJes HAIamkt • 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1 C- , Vb ��A /17 64-(4-04E &OWL- ) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. /°°' reA /' WrtR-S • • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. 9Mf 577 SWC/3 /i1 . d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, wh t? XfMt 7 / 4/ /00 $ i dvA ® l-%]. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? t-/4 C'p J C J7t f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 7UA0/t/4 URB GAJ% g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? /4. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. %U!9 . Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NRX X(zes 7drfrc. Gutu wow iu j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 7f.4/&T Motit.193 09.6A-Arr Aar/tic. d' 4C . k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: *J6" AuOlue,b it,w/,-6174 Cain pm -id £ ZWfJ 4 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? /JJ1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Y/ftPi/� GOIU' & //YS/�1,E titan �� IJy GlimAMn N7-5 5U AD! f elle`: 771 1301tlyx. O/c v Noir o Ault/ dlAii/trollurv��&5 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if an ter. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? A fU«0/4 /W U. Gt.ito k)(77/ A NDN P(...6ct/�U ni RAYL i4 iia . )VCT 7 cLc) l,� . 6cl/Natos SGL U is 7 � 77,vo czLopieb fates b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ito. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Mr" it tri/U 6/0Mitc, / *me recoL4AY Arvic i <l) 9-/ - ft7 CO/l'1pL C ARe Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Pftedea. Air � 7/f,fte(--APA-nokAt OPivoRil/AJrn, /, R IG11c(G sD/t'f/ . 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. /o b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 7477a) agi- /i/114 7WeE IBJ/ ♦ 4/ Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. /Ng sire /5 tabuobD /3y RW1L 7)/WW01,1 , t f• fit' A IMNt,4/A A sll, t itiv5A-lub/- . b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? fe Nor 7Ms! r Pe), tS tomffiti.3o Prioclo is 7Y1, '• c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the pre t el'i�at ? &tl) i UGC ?LN ' 65 577126s 77) 5%—'• d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Nxilvoly go mips / PAy, JoiNoigOU g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: PAC't Alla- CatPoi 1017- Curr of 711140164 f y' , D'p 4 & ? Jv.c » y ivy A41 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities c ently available at the site: system other: as, e, sani r, septic Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. (I Mvl u. PA/4 /N it447 01u, -c e Co � 7 Ice to lilt 140/A -V C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is ron them to e its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). SHEET INDEX 00 COVERSHEET 0I AERIAL VICINITY MAP 02 SITE PLAN 03 EXISTING STRIP MALL ELEVATIONS 04 CONTEXT PHOTOS 05 PERSPECTIVES I OG PERSPECTIVES 2 07 PE,RSPEq,TTVES 3 08, --PERSPECTIVES 09 PERSPECTIVES 5 10 WE5T, it SOUTH ELEVATIONS 1 I _it AST it NORTH ELE\TIONS jr2 ;DETAILS 13, -Ab ETAI Lam) c" ---'L I .0 LANDSCAPE /- I I . I LANDSCA \ v J (LImo.22 L� LD CA ; r J �. iFLJ DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL ECEWVED NN aaw QQMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS DECEMBER 2010 J f RIO -039 RECEIVED G V 8 0 11 1 @MMUNrTY DEVELOPMENT a AERIAL VICINITY MAP not to scale i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS J f 0 (s) z co V 7 0 W O z PL = 267.51' MONMeNT Nal TUKWILA PARKWAY (5. 158th STREET) I EXISTING BUILDING .27.05' FINIStI FL00 'f 21,907 513 EXISTING BUILDING 411_24.4 I' FINISH FLOOR 8.417 5F RECEIVED NOV 2 9 20101 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 02 4'3 SITE PLAN scale: I " = 40'-O" 'FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS J f }L1ocaq03 J lertsai, —If SOUTH ELEVATION ecrzaxcesze r.Y UFLY-SBattVO.com 11100011 811Y01V1110 pvip`Ilarcal uwwun 1 LAM aI4U =n l01 OI@COUMI Oil NORTH ELEVATION RECEIVED NOV 2 9 20101 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEST ELEVATION EXISTING STRIP MALL ELEVATIONS i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS Jlf CONTEXT PHOTOS RECEIVED NOV 2 9 20101 CONWNITY meswasawr i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS 04 Jlf TLI 0 -acl RECEIVED NOV 2 9 20101 MAMMY wataniair PERSPECTIVES 1 i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS J f 14.10-o•M RECEIVED NM 2 2ZE' GJ ca 1 PERSPECTIVES 2 i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS J f RIO "(ZCI 07 RECEIVED NOV 292010' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES 3 'FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS 16 APRIL 20 I 0 J f vi '6wo3q RECEIVED NOV 2g2O COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti PERSPECTIVES 4 i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS J f RECEIVED D NOV 2 9 2010' • COMMUNITY O(=VELOPT 05 PERSPECTIVES 5 i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWIIA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS Jf o to own A. ri-Nr KEY NOTES CD METAL TRIM EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR () METAL CORRUGATED SIDING (I) WINDOW CF) GLASS STOREFRONT CD C.M.U.(Concrete Masonry Unit) ED METAL army CANOPY CD CONCRETE BASE CD VENTILATION LOUVERS CD SIGNAGE Rio -o3q I0 1 II , ''- '-' --'• INDOORtr111 ,S'r(s(D1\/1NG I 1i: ' IIII1'' Ir 1 1,1 ,1 10.04fil 671T+ 1D.BUY ..01w Yrs= To CCM RICCEOn_AL, _ ea.V. 311:04)ft0014 T NAY 0201,1 6,7,CI f BOY tO,..:07 CCM 1.51, SOUTH ELEVATION = .-cr DESIGN R • • • RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2010 commUNITY 0,EVELOPMENT i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCH ITECTS . - 3 J f OO C) 5.8 0 KEY NOTES O METAL TRIM CD METAL CORRUGATED SIDING O3 GLASS STOREFRONT (4, METAL ENTRY CANOPY O VENTILATION LOUVERS O EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR i 1 it10-03cf O7 WINDOW C.M.U.(Concrete Masonry Un ) O9 CONCRETE BASE I O) SIGNAGE I 1 NEW SERVICE DOOR (SEE DOOR SCHEDULE) j Z PLASTER SMOOTH FINISH 0 —1 - —�--7asr*. mm00. ura as 0%0. INDOOR KYDIVINI3 'A CW 0:011104, 415 ro 0101 ,rase 10 CIAO iwmvrra± a tnr cw. NORTH ELEVATION 1,/1 = 1'-(i" RECEIVED OOMMUNITY DEVELOPMF-NT iFLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS J f EXISTING STRUCTURAL WIDE FLANGE WITH NEW PAINT NEW CORRUGATED METAL PANEL NEW DECORATIVE METAL TENSION ROD WELDED TO EXISTING CANOPY EXISTING METAL CANOPY WITH NEW PAINT STREET LIGHTS RECEIVE® MUpy — NEW LANDSCAPE & TREES BASE OF TOWER BI-DIRECTIONAL LIGHT FIXTURE FOR UP -LIGHT AND DOWN -LIGHT. LANDING I -FLY ENTRANCE DETAILS i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWI LA, WAShINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS Jrl "SPLIT FACE" C.M.U. TO GIVE "SOFT' TEXTURE & COLOR 7-7 A0� VL1O -01 VIEW FROM 405 FREEWAY 1111.1110HORIZONTAL BAND PATTERN TO REDUCE MASSING. RECEIVED V2(6sI DE LOMENT VIEW FROM MALL DETAILS i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS Jlf 0 X WI-Kl� �IQila�x� 0 1 emw Iklit ork mite 11111111111 o (9 •i .U' �ti� 1�0 ■ ® • eir w LIGHTING NOTE: THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING FIXTURES 4 LOCATION OF CONDUIT SHOWN IN PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL. REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL AND OR THE ARLHITEGTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. 6' GONG. WALK WITH 51400TH BROOM FINISH SEE NOTES, SIDEWALK DETAIL G. WELDED WIRE MESH SHALL BE 6'X6' W I.4'X W 1.4' (AASHTO MS5) 3/8' EXP. JOINT 2" LIGHT CENTERED IN 12' CONCRETE STRIP FRONT ENTRANCE WITH NEW LANDING SCALE: I" = 5' GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 2.5 5 (Qi PEEr) 1 Inca =. 6 Leet WELDED WIRE MESH 1. SIDEWALK AND CURB ! GUTTER CANNOT BE POURED IN BOTTOM I/3 OF CONCRETE MONOLITHICALLY. 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE GEMENT CONCRETE CLAW 4000 P51 MINIMUM, WITH AIR ENTRAINMENT. NO COLOR OR TINT SHALL BE ADDED. 4' MINIMUM 3/4' COMPACTED 3. FORMS SHALL BE SET TRUE TO LINE AND GRADE AND GRAVE. A5 DETERMINED SHALL BE STEEL UNLESS OTHENYISE APPROVED BY BY THE ENGINEER INSPECTOR 4. SIDEWALK SHALL NOT BE POURED IN THE RAIN OR COLD WEATHER (SOW FREEZING). 45% COMPACTED SUSS/RADE • SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS $ PVC CONCUIT SIZE 4 LOCATION. SIDEWALK SECTION FOR LIGHTING NO SCALE PVC CONDUIT • PRE EMERGENCE HERBICIDE (APPROX 0 1.03/2300 SO FT) 4' MINIMUM 3/4' COMPACTED GRAVEL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER 3/8" EXP. JOINT 10 es EVN15 ' I - E01H45SY o, BUCK _ - SUITES ' DR s.BAKER', a fir" z• ' - ,. , _: JTT70GR't, 7114 ES LG Z W O m 211 WET VIG NITY MAP N.T.S. CONTACT INFO LOCATION THE ANNEX a 50UTHCENTER 301 TUKWILA PARKWAY CLIENT THE ANNEX 0 SOUTHCENTER ARCHITECT -ENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS 1130 LEARY WAY REDMOND, VIA 98052 PHONE:425-216-0318 CONTACT, DAVE DEY, AIA CIVIL /SURVEY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PAGE ENGINEERS INC. 11235 KIRKLAND WAY, SUITE 300 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 PHONE 425-821-2014 FAX,425-521-3043 CONTACT, KEN NILSEN, PE. PAGE ENGINEERS INC. 11255 KIRKLAND WAY, SUITE 300 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 SACT JOHN RJ 14 3ENKO 4416b A5I.A 3 SHEET INDEX L1.0 OF 9 LI.1 OF 3 L120F3 FRONT ENTRANCE -LANDING AREA REAR ENTRANCE -TRANSFORMER AREA OVERALL SITE PLAN GOL0 JOINT NEW CURB 9515 COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4' MIN THICKNESS BROOM FINISH SIDEWALK SECTION NO SCALE PAVEMENT RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2410 1 COMMUNITY W N a 0 w S re o a 1 u3 hi •3 ! /9 R -cr.?N § .17.4d Mia STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED SCAPE J18CHITECT JOHN E. RUBENKONIG CERTIFICATE NO. 574, IFLY-INDOOR SKYDIVING Q ce W 14.1 Z �< < p a - W 0—I U< U X y Q 1n Zzz Q Q 0 w JJH') 1- 0 s LLL SCALE: DATE: 1"- 5' AUG 10, 2010 DESIGNED BY: JR CHECKED BY: JR JOB NUMBER 10810.00 DWG NAME: P10610_LP SHEET L1.0 OF 3 i 0 0 o n < 0NO pN 10U omvz9 o\\a l aaYp aoOXO' mmman z{� F c LANDSCAPE NOTES I. ALL TECHNIQUES AND METHODS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANDSCAPE PORTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE OF THE FIRST QUALITY AS COMPARED TO THE STANDARDS OF THE INDUSTRY. ALL ASPECTS OF THIS WORK WILL BE SUB.EGT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 2. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS ON SITE. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THAT PORTION OF THIS PROJECT. 3. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSING OF ALL DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND ANY EXGE55 MATERIAL INCURRED BY THIS PRO -ECT. 4. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS AND 517E CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF TIE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 5. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO TREE INSTALLATION 140 TREES SHALL BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN 5 FEET TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. 6. VERIFY EXISTING GRADING IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF CONDITIONS ARE OTHER THAN EXPECTED, CONTACT THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. T. EXISTING TOPSOIL SHOULD BE STRIPPED FROM CONSTRUCTION LOCATIONS, SAFELY STORED ON SITE, AND REUSED IN PLANTING BED PREPARATION. AU5MB4T INHERE NECESSARY WITH 5TEERG0', PACIFIC TOP SOIL WINTER MIX OR AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT. TILL THOROUGHLY INTO PLANTING BEDS AND LAWN AREAS TO A 6' MINIMUM DEPTH. REMOVE ROCKS AND DEBRIS LARGER THAN I'. 8. DOVER ALL TREE, SHRUB AND GROUNDGOVER PLANTING AREAS WITH A TYIO INCH MINIMUM THICKNESS OF MULCH. 9. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PORTION OF THIS PROJECT DURING CONSTRUCTION AND FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THIS WORK SHALL TAKE THE FORM OF WATERING WHERE NECESSARY, DEBRIS PICKUP, REMOVAL OF INVASIVE NON -NATIVES SUCH AS HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY 8 REED CANARY GRASS AND ANY PRUNING NEEDED TO KEEP TIE LANDSCAPE IN FIRST GLASS CONDITION. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE IN GOOD GROWING CONDITION AT THE TIME OF PLANTING AND SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE FULL YEAR OR UNTIL THE NEXT GROWING SEASON (WHICHEVER TIME PERIOD 15 LONGER) AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE. ANY REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL REQUIRED SHALL BE EXACTLY THE SAME A5 OPJ61NALLY SPECIFIED A5 TO TYPE AND SIZE. IN THE EVENT THAT A PARTICULAR PLANT SPECIES 5 NOT SURVIVING, A SUBSTITUTE SPECIES MAY BE SELECTED, PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -DO ANY TREE STAKING A5 15 APPROPRIATE DURING THIS TIME PERIOD. 11. DIG, PACK, TRANSPORT AND HANDLE ALL PLANTS WITH CARE TO ENSURE PROTECTION FROM INJURY. STORE PLANTS IN THE MANNER NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THEIR HORTICULTURAL REQUIREMENTS. HEEL -IN PLANTS AND IRRIGATE A5 NEEDED TO KEEP FROM DRYING OUT. 12. INSTALL APPROPRIATE TRANSPLANTER FERTILIZER TO ALL PLANTING, PITS A5 SPECIFIED 51' MANUFACTURER 13. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING ALL PLANTS TO ENSURE THEIR SURVIVAL UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. IF CLIENT DESIRES, INSTALL A TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SYSTEM PLANTING NOTES 1. THE IDEAL TIME FOR PLANTING 15 SEPTEMBER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY IRRIGATION FROM INSTALLATION UNTIL APPROXIMATELY NOVEMBER I OR THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE RAINY SEASON. IF NECESSARY, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHALL CONTINUE THE FOLLOWING SUMMER FROM MAY TILL NOVEMBER 2. SOIL SPECIFICATION FOR AREAS PREVIOUSLY USED A5 PARKING. REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND CRUSHED ROCK 8,45E (ASSUMED TO BE 6' COMBINED DEPTH). TO LOOSEN THE 5UBGRADE, TILL THIS EXISTING SOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12'. ADD 4' CEDAR GROVE COMPOST IN TWO EQUAL LIFTS AND TILL THOROUGHLY INTO THE LOOSENED SOIL. RAKE SMOOTH. ADD 6' OF PACIFIC TOPSOIL WINTERMIX AND TILL INTO SOIL RAKE SMOOTH AND COMPACT TO 15%. ADD ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL (12" MINIMUM) TO MATCH EXISTING ADJACENT 6RADE5 OF LANDSCAPED AREAS AND TOP OF NEW CURB. COMPACT THE RESULTING 501L TO 15%. PLANT SHRUBS AND LAWN PER PLAN. ADD 2' OF MULCH AROUND ALL PLANTED AREAS. EXISTING GRASS TO REMAIN REMOVE GRASS FROM NEW PLANTING BED AREAS NEW GRASS SF 96 SHRUB PLANTING NO SCALE HEY( PLANING BED. SEE PLANTING NOTE 2 NEW GRASS / 5F= 69J PLANTING PLAN AT NEW TRANSFORMER SCALE, I" = 5' 3-2"X2" 5TAKE5 DRIVE (MIN 2') FIRMLY INTO SUBGRADE PRIOR TO'BAGKFILLIN6 STAKE ABOVE FIRST BRANCHES OR AS NECESSARY FOR FIRM SUPPORT PLANT 50 THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL 15 LEVEL WITH THE FINISHED GRADE 2 STRAND TWISTED 12 GUA6E 6AL. WIRE ENCASED IN 2' DIA. RUBBER H05E FERTILIZER - PLACE PRIOR TO BARK MULCH APPLICATION. BARK MULCH - 2° LAYER FEATHER TO TREE TRUNK. FORM SAUCER WITH 5" CONTINUOUS RIM :II El HE -III: GUT AND REMOVE ALL NRAPPIN6 81_1 BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF BALL. 1 I WATER 8 TAMP POCKETS TO REMOVE AIR SEE SPECIFIED PLANTING, MIX. I� T I I I 1Ri - 111-1.11=111=11 11=111- 111= li 9' TAMPED TOPSOIL I I SCARIFY TO 4" DEPTH LII�I. TREE PLANTING 140 SCALE NOTE. INSTALL 12' ROOT BARRIER WHEN STREET TREE 15 ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK. 5 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 2.5 5 10 MI MN 11 11 (114 FEET) 1 Inch = 5 feet Itto - 03cl PLANTING SCHEDULE 5Y1.1BOL BOTANICAL NAME TREES %RIES ED n COMMON SIZE QUANTITY SPACING. NAME AGER JAPONICUM DORAL BARK 1.95' GAL. 3 115' O.G. 'SAW) KAKU' JAPANESE MAPLE PRUNUS YEDOEN515 ABELIA 6RANDIFLORA ARBUTUS UNEDO YOSHINO 1.15' GAL. 8 SEE PLAN FLOWERING/ CHERRY GLOSSY 5 6ALLON 6 4' O.G. ABELIA STRAWBERRY 5 GALLON 3 5' O.G. TREE HYDRANGEA B16 -LEAF 3 GALLON 6 4' O.G. MAGROPHILLA HYDRANGEA ILEX GRENATA CONVEX 2 GALLON 14 25' O.G. 'CONVEXO' JAPANESE HOLLY PHOTINIA FRi9ERJ PRUN.6 LAUROCERASUS 'OTTO LUMEN' FRASEF15 3 GALLON 35' 0.C. PHOTINIA 'OTTO LUMEN' 3 GALLON 14 5' O.G. LAUREL ARGTOSTAPHYUUOS KINNIKINNIGK I GALLON 1004 5F / 501 18" O.G. WA -UR 1 NOTE, INFILL AROUND NEW SHRUBS IN PLANTING BEDS A5 5HOWN. EXISTING GRASS NEW GRASS LAWN SOUTH AND EAST OF TRANSFORMER 5F A 169 GRASS SEED SPEGIFIGATOIN, 40% CREEPING RED FE5GJE IO% HIGHLAND BENTGRA55 APPLY AT 5 LBS./10005F 20% KENTUCKY BUIESRAS5 90% PENNPINE RYEGRASS MULCH - 2' MINIMUM OF CEDAR GROVE COMPOST �— CONTROLLED RELEASE FERTILIZER GRANULES. PLACE PRIOR TO BARK MULCH APPLICATION. 111-111=111— 1=111-111- -E-111—=1117- d11:— 11= NOTE, SEE PLANTING PATTERN GROUND COVER NO SCALE RECEIVED NOV 2920101 COMMUNITY OEM/EL QPM Cali before you Dig. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) 0 O REVISED PER CITY REVIEW 7, N STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED UVDSCAPE A ITECT 1 JOHN E. RUBENKONIG CERTIFICATE NO. 574 FLY -INDOOR SKYDIVING IX k} IY Z talc, :,a on_ w a ® J WV) X Y 0 ZR Q Q O J w M SCALE: 1" 5' DATE: AUG 10, 2010 DESIGNED 8Y: JR CHECKED BY: JR JOB NUMBER 10610.00 DWG NAME: P10610_LP SHEET L1.1 OF 3 �. . 0 FILE NAME: P: P10\10610.00\CAD \ SHEETS \P10610JP.OWG SAVE TIME: 10/13/2010 10:48:10 AM PLOT TIME: 10/13/2010 10:59 AM USER NAME:VINCE SILVESTRE XREF FILES: 10610 -SR V -LDC, X106101P, X10610_AR, X10807_BDR, mg II D N[ gffi14°. F NV1d 3115-1-1VZ13/\0 12 ANDOVER PARK WEST E Ilk. At I m z c oo i O 0 0 re 0 0 N u' s y x z m m c 0 O 0 0 IFLY—INDOOR SKYDIVING "THE ANNEX 0 SOUTHCENTER" 301 TUKWILA PARKWAY OVERALL SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN P a�d�sns.�cao�� 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p 425.827 2014 11.425.827.5043 Civil I Structural 1 Planning !Survey paceengrs.com REVISED PER CITY REVIEW 10/10 SYM REVISION DATE 'PUO G39 • z1 N� t.ongacres•W .11 7.. Y, to n a S,'O s4 C.' �5'. 3_161st-Sc- 4 CT I tA. -, t' F . ; ' •CS Iv"-; 11 I -E nsrBI cAr----� �.• D o i'i �s�h163rd•PI�—O ti} , • n A• �sr-satnrsc R 2.125 it St ande eBlvd�.�--• 20 i0 Google, DESIGN R I SUBM 0I a AERIAL VICINITY MAP not to scale iFLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TUKWIIA, WASHINGTON JENSEN FEY ARCHITECTS Jlf i1 1- 0 (r) w z UJ CO CD W CZ I_ w 0 0 Q PL = 267.5 1' • MONUMENT SIGN !WlLA PARKWAY (5. 1 58th STREET) EXIST. SIDE WALK EXIST. LANDSCAPE SCREEN EXIST. TREES ..► OMIT 1111 WOW rI LAnDs�irabh IF THE50 SHEETS ARE NOT 24• X 50' THEN DRAWING 15 2 u EXIS . PA NG NEW TRANSFOI .4ER (810X611T) EXIST. CONC. c 1J VE TO BE REMOVE NEW 6" CONC. URVE o ALL EXISTING PLANTER TO BE PATCHED TO MATCH EXISTING CONC. WALKWAY 26.28' � I 0 EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK EXISTING BUILDING • +27.05' FINISH FLOOR ``(( 21,907 5F 2a -o" H G7'-4" I_ I —---•--� --- J. ... . y EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK 26.18' EXIST PARKING 28 EXIST. FARKING LANDSCAPE z 0 0 7 EXIST. PARKING 8 EXI T. PARKING d EXISTING BUILDING }, 24.41' FINISH FLOOR q 8,417 SF TAL EXISTING 'LDG AREA: TOTAL 'FLY USUABLE BLDG AREA : pt..10 OVL BLDG AREA: • 39,546 5F, 39,546X(3.3/1000)= 13 I PARKING STALLS 7,934 SF, 47,725 SF = 26 PARKING STALLS TRASH PL = 450.0' TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: (I 3 I +26) = 157 STALLS TOTAL EXISTING PARKING (INCL. 5 HANDICAP STALLS): 163 STALLS 0 0 0 CJ 17 EXIST. 1' 17 EXIST. P 20 EXIST LNG KING PARK AVAILABLE rREA FOR CONTRACT R USE NG LANDSCAPE 0 ! NEW LANDING 1 a SITE PLAN XG" = 1'-0" 8 0 5 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTE5: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 m MO»„e mn z (L W () SHEET: A105 OP: 570E15 rat Tr; OWALL TYPE PLAN PL10-0Sq . c -4> 4, • . • ; • ti • 3 • • 34 1 1 i :AA • 3 5.3 4! I ?2 b ; 2 It rem SMCC15 Aft NOI AA, 34, .rtx Mr 6 WI 113 31,13 A 32 f ! . r Laiu.L• *JO' —. cc' /-7.77 Arat. eta 0 I 4—/-&-Q electrical roan e-A119k. 0•61"ii 4 1, t t•-•.===—_--•=1,-...===•••3:37.3•-•-• ..-=J 1 v 1 linor 1°4°,419-144°) Vale/ w AZOrt — AbOa rrai, mte ® row Frei— 1 100 • wo,CA %AZ 43001 *55' u. 0.3043 fro-ri 4:!•! 0 • c. • I 'Ai 4 LINE Cf LIPJ 17-14. fa' f3 43 retail SPACE I I GROUND LEVEL - PLENUM DECK PLAN @+4'-5° !iv = r-cr • 2 2 • 34 5 b. PljtMIT DRAWING ISS L N.-MIN/2"w A 5 02 f OWALL TYPE PLAN ow - OILD4 "KUM wO1 PALM 1/444wor• •Ca wc4444 0 2 r Jr 05 44•4 rote I no rep. 2 3 5! nel• row, to 4444. wry red LiFI • - • Oft4,0 tr•-•----• MOM e , MON • e‘, 14 13. _4! elm L', - • -4 g. •OCOL 5720103 .r. • • MVO.. .244 0° • 'CD 77 -ti • .4. “,ltd. RM 77° !7.1 ; 2031 clasonNo TICG -4! 7- • /CCM Or tow (7-) SECOND LEVEL - OBSERVATION DECK PLAN (g +202-9 3/4" I/8" = ILO` .05 2 PARKING STUDY FOR I -FLY ANNEX AT SOUTHCENTER MAY 2010 i -Fly Tukwila Project Parking Demand Assumptions Customers / Car: 2 HoursNisit: 1.5 Weekday Cars Weekend Cars existing unsung i -Fly Avg. i -Fly i -Fly Avg. Customer i -Fly Staff I -Fly Total Weekday Customer i -Fly Staff Total Weekend Cars Cars Cars Use TOTAL Cars Cars Cars Use TOTAL 1 25 26 0 1 61 2 0 2 4 60 64 0 4 79 8 0 8 1 9 83 92 4 12 87 4 12 2 10 2 10 87 97 4 12 95 4 12 3 11 1 9 91 100 3 11 93 3 11 3 11 2 10 85 95 3 11 91 4 12 3 11 4 12 64 76 4 12 83 3 11 5 13 4 12 65 77 3 11 77 3 11 5 13 4 12 58 70 4 12 46 4 12 3 11 5 13 41 54 3 11 42 2 10 4 12 5 13 56 69 3 11 24 3 11 4 12 4 12 55 67 2 10 29 4 10 3 9 2 6 51 57 1 5 38 2 6 2 6 O 4 46 50 1 5 36 O 4 1 5 O 4 1 5 62 83 99 107 104 102 95 88 58 53 35 39 43 41 Rent Roll annex - The Annex © Southcenter As of Date: 08/04/2010 Select By: Lease From Date Tenant Unit Unit Name Sqft 301 Pro Golf Discount 7,840.00 309 Linh Tran Sun Sign 1,120.00 311 Mr. Formal 1,905.00 313. Store #164 Life Uniform 1,120.00 319 Win Staffing 900 321 Discount Gun Sales 1,135.00 325 Tan Elite 1,666.00 327 Qualstar Credit Union 1,564.00 331 Paper Zone 4,354.00 339 i -Fly 4,816.00 341 New Retail 3,136.00 345 Rockier Retail Group, Inc. 4,704.00 349 U.S. Recruiters 4,704.00 70 Pearle Vision 5,400.00 80 Teriyaki Time 1,306.00 90 US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle Dist. 1,501.00 HALLWAY VACANT 110 17 Total 47,281.00 16 Total Occupied 47,171.00 94.12 % Occupied 99.77 1 Total Vacant 110 5.88 % Vacant 0.23 Usable Area Unit Parking Stalls Type. Req. Req. Retail Sales, General 0.004 31.4 Manufacturing 0.001 1.1 Retail Sales, General 0.004 7.6 Retail Sales, General 0.004 4.5 Office 0.003 2.7 Retail Sales, General 0.004 4.5 Clinic 0.003 5.0 Bank 0.003 4.7 Retail Sales, General 0.004 17.4 4,103 Retail Sales, General 0.004 16.4 1,643 Retail Sales, General. 0.004 6.6 Retail Sales, General 0.004 18.8 Office 0.003 14.1 Retail Sales, General 0.004 21.6 Restaurant 0.01 13.1 Office 0.003 4.5 174.0 Stalls Provided 159.0 overparked -15.0 „°d / 5 C� `' C 1Q9 Page 1 of 1 fierio-msi r4r; :LS3Pd Mt_ N cravens 790 ft Copyright 02006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. http://maps.digitalmapcentral.com/production/CityGIS/v07_02_003/index.html 07/19/2010 0 N w w Q mN C9 N w SZ CZ 0 w 0 0 z MONUMENT SIGN TUKWILA PARKWAY (5. 158th STREET) E%sT. IANDSCARE SCREEN MST. TREES 401.0' r_ TAI!4170 4-1m1~, 4110M EX15T. SIDE WALK 5,t15 ACE PAR-NG LANDSCAPE 26.28 E%!STING CONC. SIDEWALK r4ef mss'..; AS L1 -n 1 NEW rwANsroRMer (8'%Hxsrin NEK 6' COW.:. Cl4'VE ex ST CONC. CURVE 10 BE REMOVED PROPOSED AREA OF WORK ALL 015TING PLANTER. TO BE PATCHED TO MATCH EXISTING CONC. WALE.WA/ 00 c o� 23.43' 4-4 EXISTING BUILDING _,40i+ 27.05' FINISH FLOOR .27.05' 21,90750 67-4'_-_ EXISTING CONC. 500W80 5 8 ,05100 0 27'-0_ p }-23.58 VeAVAI 0OK OF NoTrs PFNUIT SFT :Arn 0A*r. 18/04/10 \ 1009 26.18 4 71(5T. PAPA, G NEW LANDING 4I -� vl T. PA'LUNG • 3 7 VII, T. PARCING T. PARKING EXISTING BUILDING Yh 24.41' 811,1151-1811,1151-1FLOOR 8,417 58 1 TOTAL EXISTING ElLG AREA: 39,546 SF, 39,546X(3.3/ 1000)= 131 PARKING STALLS TOTAL tPLY USUAB E BLDG ARA : 7,934 SF, = 26 PARKING STALLS TOTAL BLDG AREA: 47,725 LSF LANDSCAPE PL=4507 "` 1 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: (1 31,+26) = 1 57 STALLS TOTAL EXISTING PARKING (INCL. 5 HANDICAP STALLS): r 163 STALLS ^V► SITE PLAN Nc' = 1'-O A105 TO OD: Pxv;kf Fc.c71-- %t,1 AC/( 61k ovt '514)(-0-1 • 0.754- 5111 5fvut to4. 1 b A/C � G5k Gc,t7c- kz1D/(1 ;,)/ Fcv(e'‘t _ 066 fp. di Priir � �1;;tiIINV;�1 j1� I+ !+! .11 �au.uu":,,,, 0.4 el1I Till PI7 I� r►ra ' '�1111111 ' west elevation 041,6tA 06640 +4.S12- SF Gil 5r • • north elevation • • IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 30' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. i FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING THE ANNEX @SOUTH CENTER, TUKWILA PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION I • GENERAL NOTES liviii SYMBOLS LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET INDEX I. 2. 3. 4. 5. G 7. 8. ` 10. I I . 12 13 • 14 15 •-.DIMENSIONS 16 '- 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25 26 27 28. 29 ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE 200G EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (I.B.C.) WITH WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS, AND OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY AND LOCAL CODES. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.. DIMENSIONS ARE TO GRID LINE5,,TO FACE OF CONCRETE WALLS, TO FACE OF FRAMED WALLS, AND TO CENTER LINE OF COLUMNS AND PARTY WALLS, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. PROVIDE HORIZONTAL FIREBLOCKING IN ALL FRAME WALLS AT I O' -O" ON CENTER AND WHEREC3 FRAME WALLS PENETRATE CEILINGS. FIREBLOCK IN ACCORDANCE WITH I.B.C. LATEST LOCALLY ADOPTED EDITION GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT(S) OR CHANGES BETWEEN DETAILS OR BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY AND PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK. •FINISH FLOOR REFERENCE DATUM EQUALS (0-0). REFER TO TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR ACTUAL SITE ELEVATION. MAXIMUM CHANGE IN FLOOR ELEVATION AT ANY DOORWAY, OR MAX. THRESHOLD HEIGHT SHALL NOT•EXCEED 1/2" VERTICALLY. PROVIDE SMOKE SEALS © STAIRWAY THRESHOLDS. ALL DECORATIVE MATERIALS 4 FURNITURES ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A FLAME RETARDANT CONDITION. PROVIDE ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AS INDICATED ON THE ELECTRICAL PLAN, A5 SPECIFIED, AND A5 REQUIRED BY CODE. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE -RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR -CEILINGS AND ROOF -CEILINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED A5 REQUIRED IN IBC CHAPTER 7. ALL FIRE STOP MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RATED IN ACCORDANCE W/ ASTM E 814 OR UL 1479 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION, ACCESS ROADS AND WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AND MAINTAINED PER 2000 IFC. 4 FIRE DEPT. :REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE NON -PAPER FACED MOISTURE -RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD ON WALLS IN WET 4 MOISTURE -PRONE AREAS. • FLOOR DRAIN TRAP SEAL PROTECTION: FLOOR DRAINS OR SIMILAR TRAPS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM * SUBJECT TO INFREQUENT USE SHALL BE PROTECTED W/ A TRAP SEAL PRIMER, EXCEPT WHERE NOT DEEMED NECESSARY FOR SAFETY OR SANITATION BY THE LOCAL HEALTH DEPT: TRAP SEAL PRIMERS SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE 4 PROVIDED WITH LOCKING COVERS. OF SITE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE FROM A SURVEY BY OTHERS. ARCHITECT BEARS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL ROUGH -IN DIMENSIONS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT 4 FIXTURES FURNISHED 4 INSTALLED. TYPICAL WALL SECTIONS, FINISHES, AND DETAILS ARE NOT CALLED -OUT EVERYWHERE AND MAY BE SHOWN ONLY ONCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A5 IF DRAWN IN FULL AND SHALL REFER TO DETAILED DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY BACKING TO SECURE ANY FIXTURE OR EQUIPMENT TO STRUCTURE AND PROVIDE BACKING FOR EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORY SUPPORT FOR THE FOLLOWING: I . SHELVING, 2. LAVATORIES, 3. CABINETS 4 CASEWORK, 4. TOILET ACCESSORIES, 5. CLOSET ACCESSORIES, G. STAIR* HAND RAILS, 7. GARMENT HOOKS, 8. GRAB BARS, 9. PICTURES/ART WORK, 10. HEADBOARDS, 1 1 . DOOR* FINISH HARDWARE, AND ANY OTHER WALL * CEILING -MOUNTED ITEMS. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT 4 OWNER. CONTRACTOR(5) SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE TRADES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAFELY SHORE, BRACE, AND SUPPORT ALL WORK AS NECESSARY AND THIS SHALL BE THE FULL AND SOLE RESPONSILBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NO ACT, DIRECTION, REVIEW, OR OBSERVATION OF ANY SYSTEMS OR METHODS OF THE CONTRACTOR BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THIS RESPONSIBILITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS NECCESARY FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF ALL WORK, EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPECT THE WORK OF OTHER CONTRACTORS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND LIABLE TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS WOLK CODES: ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPILANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS AND ANY OTHER AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION (AHJ) OVER THE PROJECT. CONTRACTORS) SHALL PROTECT AND INDEMNITY THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT AGAINST ANY CLAIM OR LIABILITY ARISING FROM VIOLATION OF SUCH CODES OR REGULATIONS PERMITS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL REQUIRED SUBCONTRACTOR PERMITS. QUALITY: WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF THE TRADES INVOLVED AND THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND MATERIALS USED AND PROVIDED OF THE BEST QUALITY THE MARKET AFFORDS. ALL INSTALLATIONS AND APPLICATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. GUARANTEE: ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF IPT F NOT LESS THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OR RICE O OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE UNLESS SPECIFIED FOR A LONGER TIME PERIOD. TRASH REMOVAL: EACH CONTRACTOR* TRADE SHALL PROVIDE FOR TRASH REMOVAL AT THE END OF EACH DAY. EACH CONTRACTOR* TRADE SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH E DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND WITHIN THE BUILDING AND AREAS SWEPT CLEAN. IT IS NOT THE INTENT OF;THE DRAWINGS TO SHOW OR INDICATE ALL FASTENING OK FRAMING TECHNIQUES AND/OR DEVICES AND FASTNEERS, OR TO SHOW OR DEPICT ALL CONDITIONS PRESENT. ALL INTERIOR FINISHES SHALL BE CLASS "11" MIN. WITH FLAME SPREAD RATING OF LESS THAN 75 EXCEPT IN EGRESS STAIR ENCLOSURES FINISHES SHALL BE CLASS "1".WITH FLAME SPREAD OR STRICTER IF REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CODES. COMPLY WITH THE I.B.C. AND I.F.C. AND LOCAL CODES PERTAINING TO USE OF ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND FLAME -PRODUCING DEVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ;,GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSABLE FOR COORDINATING ANDL PERMITTING DEFERRED SUBMITTAL55. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT IS REQUIRED BEFORE . PERMIT SUBMITTAL: • BUILDING SECTION 0� SECTION cENw emmN rOOR� -ROOM ROOM SYMBOL ELEVATIONMARKER 6001 COVER SHEET Ili 101 53.3 CONCRETE SECTIONS DETAILS, CIVIL A2 10 ELEVATION 54.1 LATERAL ELEVATIONS CI CIVIL COVER SHEET A2 15 ELEVATION 54.2 LATERAL ELEVATIONS NAVE %11117E- LOCATED ONSLEET WALL SECTION8 1 303 1 +- -0' AFF ROOMNUMBER GRD MARKERS C2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A300 SECTION 55.1 TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS. F .. O •r--Lui.y5 w ONE DIRECTION EXISTING (a4- NUMBERS W THE OTHER DOOR SYMBOL .® F -DOOR NUMBER WALL SYMBOL REVISION CLOUD +-WALL IDENTIFICATIONA00I TESC PLANE CONSTRUCTION NOTES A305 SECTION 55.2 TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS (N)NEW Q �- SECTION IDENTIFICATION C4 TESC NOTES 4 DETAILS A310 SECTION 55.3 STEEL SECTIONS 4 DETAILS A� LOCATE/ ON SHEET(E) BUILDING ELEVATION C5 UTILITY PLAN A315 WALL SECTION 55.4 LATERAL FRAME DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL P500 ENLARGED STAIRS PLAN AND SECTIONS 4A ELEVATION IDENTIFICATION LOCATED ON SIFT DETAIL CODE INFORMATION A505 DETAILS -STAIR Q n DEMIYWG NUMBER WINDOW SYMBOL ❑F E-WNDOW IDENTIFICATION A002 SAFETY/ EXIT PLAN A5 10 DETAILS - ELEVATOR 0••\•< -DETAIL IDD0RCATIDN A-5 MATCH UNE A003 ACCESSIBILITY A600 WALL TYPES , LOATED ON SET T INTERIOR 1L.EVATION 18 ELEVATION IDENTIFICATIONSTRUCTURAL A004 FIRE PENETRATION A605 SCHEDULES SHADED P001001 IS THE �j/ HORN PR Y SIDE caCONSIDERED9. CDAC- KEY NOTE O A005 ENERGY COMLPIANCES STUDY Al 00 SITE PLAN 51.1 GENERAL NOTES A -s c LOCATED ON SHEET \// A105 DEMOLITION PLAN 51.2 GENERAL NOTES A 110 PLENUM LEVEL PLAN 52. I PLENUM FRAMING PIAN P115 GROUND LEVEL PLAN 52.2 PLENUM DECK FRAMING PLAN ABBREVIATIONS A 1 20 SECOND LEVEL PLAN 52.3 OBSERVATION DECK FRAMING PLAN A.B. ANCHOR BOLT F. FIXED N. NORTH 50. FT. SQUARE FOOT ABV. ABOVE FA.U. FORCED AIR UNIT NAT. NATURAL SO. IN. SQUARE INCH A.F F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR F.E.C. FIFE EXTINGUISHER N.I.C. RIOT IN CONTACT 50. YD.SOUARE YARD ACOUS. ACOUSTICAL CABINET No. NUMBER ST. STREET A.D. APEA DRAIN F F. FINISH FLOOR N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE STD. STANDARD ADJ. ADJUSTABLE FG. FUEL GAS STL. STEEL AGC. AGGREGATE FIN. FINISH 0/ OVER STOR. STORAGE ALT. ALTERNATE 01X1. FUTURE 0.C. ON CENTER STRUCT.STRUCTURAL ALUM. ALUMINUM FLASH. FLASHING 0.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER SUSP SUSPENDED APPROX. APPROXIMATE FLR. FLOOR O.F. OVER FLOW SYM. SIMILAR APT. APARTMENT FLR'G. FLOORING O.H. OVER HEAD 545 SMOOTH 4 SIDES ASPH. ASPHALT FLUOR. FLUORESCENT OPEN'G. OPENING A.S.T.M. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE OPP. OPPOSITE T. TREAD TESTING MATERIALS F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH OV. OVEN T&B TOP & BOTTOM F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY T&G TONGUE & GROOVE BD. BOARD F.O.S. FACE OF STUD PB. PUSH BUTTON TC. TOP OF CONCRETE BERM. BEDROOM F.P. FIREPLACE PC. PULL CHAIN PH. TELEPHONE BLK. BLOCK FR. FRENCH DOOR PL. PROPERTY LINE TEMP TEMPERED BLK'G. BLOCKING F5 FINISH SURFACE PEAS. PLASTIC THK. THICK BM. BEAM F.S. FLOOR SINK PLAS. LAM, PLASTIC LAMINATE THRESHTHRESHOLD BOT. BOTTOM FREO. FPEOUENCY PLAST. PLASTER T.0.8. TOP OF BEAM BR. BROOM FTG. FOOTING PLYWD. PLYWOOD T.O.0 TOP OF CURB PNL. PANEL T.O.F. TOP OF GRATING PR. PAIR T.O.G TOP OF GRATE CAB. CABINET GA. GAUGE PRCST. PRECAST T.0 S TOP OF STEEL C.B. CATCH BASIN GALV. GALVANIZED PREFAB. PREFABRICATED 7.0 W. TOP OF WALL CEM. CEMENT GAR. GARAGE TRANS. TRANSOM CER. CERAMIC G.I. GALVANIZED IRON DRY. QUARRY TS. TUBE STEEL C,I• CAST IRON GYP. GYPSUM QTY. QUANTITY TYP. TYPICAL C.J. CEILING JOIST GYP. BD. GYPSUM BOARD CLG. CEILING R. RISER U.L UNDERWRITERS COMP. COMPOSITION RAD. RADIUS LABORATORY CONC. CONCRETE HB. HOSE BIB R.A.G. RETURN AIR GRILLE UNFIT. UNFINISHED CONT. CONTINUOUS HC. HOLLOW CORE RD. ROAD CPT. CARPET -ID. HEAD R,D. ROOF DRAIN VERT. VERTICAL CTSK. COUNTER SUNK HM. HOLLOW METAL RDWD. REDWOOD VOL. VOLUME CU. FT. CUBIC FEET HORIZ. HORIZONTAL RECP. PECEPTACLE VNYL VINYL Cu, IN CUBIC INCHES HR. HOUR REF. REFERENCE CU. YD. CUBIC YARDS HS. HORIZONTAL SLIDER REF. REFRIGERATOR W. WASHER REG. REGISTER W. WEST I.D. RENIF. REINFORCED W/ WITH D. DRYER INC. INSIDE DIAMETER REM). REQUIRED WARD WARDROBE D.E.DRINKING FOUNTAIN INSUL. INCORPORATEDLATION RF. RETAINING W,C. WATER CLOSET DF. DOUGLAS FIR INT, INSULATION RF, ROOF WD. WOOD DIA. DIAMETER INTERIOR RF'G. POOPING W.G. WIRE GLASS DIM. DIMENSION RM. DOOM W.H. WATER HEATER OISP. DISPENSER Jr JOINT R0 ROUGH W.I, WROUGHT IRON DN.DOWN JS T. JOIST R Q POUCH OPENING W/0 WITHOUT DPSS. DOUBLE POLE RUB. RUBBER wp WATERPROOF SINGLE SHELF 5 GL � WEATHER-STRIPPING KIT. KITCHEN g SOUTH WT WEIGHT DR. DOOR SC SOLID CORE D.S. DOWN SPOUT STORM DRAIN YARDN DUP. DUPLICATE LAV. LAVATORY SGD. SLIDING GLASS DOOR YD-- DW, DISH WASHER LT LIGHT S H SINGLE HUNG DWGS. DRAWINGS LVR. LOUVER SHT. SHEET SHT•G• SHEATHING SIM. SIMILAR E. EAST MAX. MAXIMUM 5LD_BY HORIZONTAL SLIDER EA. EACH MC. MEDICINE' CABINET SMANCA SHEET METAL CONTRACTORS E.I.F.S. E?TERROR INSULATION MECH. MECHANICAL'-.-: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FINISH SYSTEM MEMB. MEMBRANE,- E.J. EXPANSION JOINT MFG. MANUFgCfiU13E SPECIFICATIONS SPEC'S. ELEV. ELEVATION M.H. MAN HOE£'--- SPRINKLER ELEV. ELEVATOR MIN. MINIMUM -_ SPSS.SPRKSINGLE POLE SINGLE SHELF ENCL. ENCLOSURE MIR. MIRROR( ENT. ENTRY MTG. MOUNTING EO. EQUAL MIL. METAL EQUIP. EQUIPMENT EXT. EXTERIOR tJRR. E}TINGUISHER Al 25 LOW ROOF DECK PLAN 52.4 LOW ROOF DECK FRAMING PLAN A130 SEVICE LEVEL PIAN 52.5 SERVICE LEVEL FRAMING PLAN Al 35 ROOF PLAN 52.G ROOF FRAMING PLAN A200 ELEVATION 53. 1 CONCRETE SECTIONS 4 DETAILS A205 ELEVATION 53.2 CONCRETE SECTIONS 4 DETAILS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK #1 LESS ST. PROJECT CONTACT LIST PROJECT SUMMARY OWNER: BILL ADAMS PH: FAX: CONTACT: EMAIL: ARCHITECT: JENSEN FEYARCHITEC URE 4 PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 PH. (425) 21G-0318 FAX (425) 2 16-0329 CONTACTS: DAVE FEY, PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT davidf@jensenfey.com CIVIL ENGINEER: PACE ENGINEERING: 1 80 1 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 1000 SEATTL, WA 98101 PH. (206) 441-1855 FAX FAX (206) 448-7167 CONTACTS: KEN NILSEN, PE keno@paceengrs.com STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: SWENSON SAY PAGET 2124 THIRD AVENUE SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WA 98121 PH. (20G) 443-62 1 2 FAX (206) 443-4870 CONTACTS: BLAZE BRESKO, PE, SE bbresko swen5onsa a et.com @ g RF V �^���� ®�® AXIL' 0 .7 2010 I COMMUNITv Demolition of approximately 7900 sf of one story retial space and construction of vertical wind tunnel structure and adjacent shell space for approximately 1500 sf of new retail space. c ,r C C VICINITY MAP `� fs-- ,• • p o a' QO '8 � -""'�` }- .¢----y+^ '- v -- - WAY C/ CJ 1- T i X,. '" ✓ R r r r Ne �y Y a� VVV »� i j 1 N t T 4 Ri rTi t:1 la PKwY u u -w+- VY` a-. ,_,..yt, -7l,-4-'...^.... N � ro , , bi i e'"" (, ( - o T r L� (/'''I��^� 2 , ® . P.' t'^ j 7?i ti - td �k �1 - I c • r.,„.. P.RER107ti-f0 ,A ,o:..� SC 4'...61,..,:;',3,yup ..w :sa..w.+» g• • ", •' - DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION I liviii d ai Ili 101 DRAWN BY. UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET ?PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: . 1009: Jlf Jensen, Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL: 425 216.0316 FAX: 425 216.0329 ( JJ 0 W C.7 WzW 00 z z z S J Q ,O@) w C:) >w 0 U 1-i Z W &) uJ ax WQ O 1-L CZ i-, Oro Z 0 - SHEET: GOOI :OF: SHEETS FILE NAME: P: P10 10610 U -FLY ENGINEERING \ GAD \ SHEETS \P10610_CVR.DWG SAVE TIME: 6/30/2010 11:31:10 AM PLOT TIME: 6/30/2010 11:40 AM USER NAME:STEVE MORALES XREF FILES: X10610_BDR I- FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING "THE ANNEX @ SOUTH CENTER" 301 TUKWILA PKWY COVER OWNER: BETA HOLDINGS, LTD. 18827 BOTHELL WAY N.E. BOTHELL, WA. 98011 M Figpmip Savor Cagey 1601 2nd Avenue Suite 1000 Seattle, WA 98101 p. 206 441 18551 f 206 448.7167 Civil 1 Structural 1 Planning 1 Survey paceengrs.com _o3q SYM REVISION DATE xq RE s JU FD 5Q 'std §RC1i eomIg I!sd FND MON IN CASE 3/4" PLUG W/PUNCH ELEV.=22.29(DN- 1.5') 4-7-10 SSMH RIM=23.11 CL CHAN. 8-CONC (N/S/E)=12.3 69 TUKWILA PARKWAY N68'38'48 -E 477.96' FND MON IN CASE 1/2" PLUG W/PUNCH ELEV-22.79 (ON- 1.0') 4-7-10 RPM 5 SSMH 611.1-24.46 CL CHAN: 8'CONC (0/94=14.7 24 SINGLE WHITE RP 8'W ANDOVER PARK WEST CEIVED _ 0 7.2e1a11 COMMUNITY PNELOPMENT 42' Ss ss 8 -SS 400 LF CB RIM=25.74 IE 10-CMP(W)=20.7 IE I0'CMP(E)=20.7 IE 8'CMP(S)=20.7 CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER ss fro uro uross 6 -DEC_ UP ` -26 NC C RB BM 10780-66.90 F 1 1 raA55 NAIL & WASHER P , EL -2615 UP ss CW DRIVEWAY 6bEC r uro 6'0170 Eno 8'S0 so Lf. CB RIM -26.07 10 10'CMP(W)-21.2 IE 8"CMP(E)-21.2 -- 27- ------ 8'SD w CMP(W) 22.0 6 2w -- 6OEC- so 6'DEC 6'000 GRASS 8'SD CB RIM=25.85 IE 8'CMP(W)=23.0 10 8"CMP(E)=23.0 ---------------- e- so YCON CB RIM -26.27 10 8'CMP(W)-24.3 6.Sr EX. CURB TYP P.AryO C 13 - - 0. ASPHALT P.A. CURB ti FACE BLDG. no ip 0 m I.o f ev in 1ti F A ma TO,m`s FACE BLDG. n 2 RECORD LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N/A LEGEND WATER VALVE HYDRANT j1 FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION ® WATER METER 101 POST INDICATOR VALVE 11 ® MANHOLES (SS/SD) ❑ CB -0- POWER/UTILITY POLE E- GUY ANCHOR ® JUNCTION 80X ❑4 POWER TRANSFORMER 07 O POWER/TELEPHONE VAULT ® GAS METER SS ---3 STREET LIGHT 60* LUMINAIRE x SPOT ELEVATION 0J DEODUOUS TREE L:} CONIFER TREE B FOUND CASED MONUMENT HOSE BIB W IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE BOX C CONCRETE CW CONCRETE WALKWAY P.A. PLANTED AREA SSS SANITARY SIDE SEWER C.O. CLEAN OUT Q WATER VAULT RPM RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER )2( 5170 PK NAIL/ALUMINUM WASHER STAMPED 'PACE CONTROL' NOTES: CENTER LINES RIGHT-OF-WAY ONES WATER UNE ss SANITARY SEWER LINE so STORM DRAIN UNE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND POWER UNES UF▪ O UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICS HORIZONTAL DATUM: DEED & RECORD OF SURVEY IN SECTION 23-23-04 BASIS OF BEARINGS: HELD N0014'09'W ALONG EAST UNE OF SW 1/4, SE 1/4 23-23-4. VERTICAL DATUM: PER EXISTING SURVEY BY APEX ENGINEERING LLC UNDER FILE NO. 28368 DATED 6/11/04. BEUEVED TO BE TO NGVD 1929 DATUM. SITE AREA: N/A ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL SURVEY MARKERS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS TAKEN ON APRIL, 2010, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. WORK. PERFORMED IN CONJUNCTION WITH T1-115 SURVEY UTIUZED THE FOLLOIWNG EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES: (A) TREMBLE S6 ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION, MAINTAINED TO THE MANUFACTURER'S.SPECIFICATIONS PER W.A.C. 332-130-100. (B) FIELD TRAVERSE. EXCEEDING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN W.A.C. 332-130-090. THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DRAWING ACCURATELY PRESENTS SURFACE FEATURES LOCATED WRING THE COURSE OF. 11410 SURVEY. UNDERGROUND UT1UT1ES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED SOLELY UPON 18006941106 PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND PACE ENGINEERS DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY OR ASSUME UABIUTY FOR THEIR ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS . CONTRACTOR/ENGINEERS SHALL VERIFY EXACT SIZE AND LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CALL FOR LOCATE: UTIUTY LOCATION SERVICE: 1-800-425-5555. GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 20 40 MIN MN OM ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 fl. NOTE; SPOT ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN TURNED OFF FOR PURPOSES OF CLARITY TO VIEW THIS INFORMATION THAW LAYERS V -POINT -•.4 PORTION OF: N. 1/2, SECTION 26, & S. 1/2 SECTION 23, T. 23N., R. 4E., W.M. CAD/CALC FW DRAWN DMB PLAT CHI NC SYM REVISION DATE BY APP'D 1601 2nd Avenue Suite 1000 Seattle, WA 98101 p. 206.441.18551 f. 206.448.7167 Civil 1 Structural 'Planning 1 Survey An Enghserbg Sm4ce9 Company paceengrs.com UFLY INDOOR SKYDIVING DATE 4-12-10 SCALE 1' -20' SURVEY TEAM PG/DB FIELD BOOK 1078D DWG FILE .10610-SRV.DWG TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BILL ADAMS PROJECT N0. 10610.10 SHEET 1 OF' 1 BDR FND MON IN CASE 3/4" PLUG W/PUNCH ELEV.-22.29(DN- 1 5') 4-7-10 551,111 RIM=23.11 CL CHAN. 8'CONC (9/5/0=12.3 MONUMENT SIGN EXIST. SIDE WALK TUKWILA PARKWAY 1)01111L7. YF..LI OW R! -!..1S N86'38'48"E 477.96' STRAW WATTLE. WITH SSMH RIM2446 SANDBAGS'AT NEW G. CHAN. B'CONC .-WATER METER AND (E/w)=14.7 TRANSFORMER LOCATIO SINGLE_ WIin[ R7 FND MON IN CASE 1/2' PLUG W/PUNCH ELEV=2279 (DN- 1.0') \ 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE PERMIT(S) AND CONDITIONS, THE APPROVED 4-7-10 PLANS, AND A CURRENT COPY OF CITY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE. GENERAL NOTES, 1. LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR EXISTING UTIUTIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 2. AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARTING PROJECT SITE WORK, NOTIFY THE UTIUTES INSPECTOR AT 206-433-0179. 3. REQUEST A PUBUC WORKS UTIUTY INSPECTION AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CAWING 206-433-0179. 4. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES SOLE RESPONSIBIUTY FOR WORKER SAFETY, AND DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. • 6 -DEC {. )6'0E2 003 PIN 7- !_ "CMP(w 1 ; IC 1 ;M ( ) 2J 7 1( FIM r.ti7 !E II 041(41- 2 11 472611(11=.._. 26.28' ANDOVER PARK WEST r 118"0.11'(',V)• I' e. -sr; E> STING CONC SIDEWALK ' 11 n `I r m ua An o$ > H ::114 1E sz1)7i_)=z;.0 \ `—INSTALL CB INSERT, TYP. CO IJN_ / 1I Ub4 M ATERIAL HAUL ROUTE ITO LSE THIS DRIVEWAY UNLESS AUTHORIZED 8Y ENGINEER .. - AND APPROVED BY THE CITY 23.43' u8 Ln EXISTING BUILDING 27.05' FINI5F1 FLOOR 21,9075F EXCAVA-ED AREA 0 U_UG EXISTING BUILDING 27.05' FIN1511 FLOOR 9,222 5F 23.56' EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK 26.18' LA BE • G wr T SPLAN SEAT SCA . 11.20' 0 10 20 40 HORI Z. Scale In Feet JUL 07 20101 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6. 7. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THESE APPROVED DRAWMNGS. ANY CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS REQUIRE PRE -APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER, AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET CITY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PUBUC WORKS DIRECTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CURRENT SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS ON-SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS PRIOR TO PROJECT FINAL APPROVAL 110. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL AND STREET MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION. 11. REPLACE OR RELOCATE ALL SIGNS DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. PL = 329.51' 2. RETAIN, REPLACE OR RESTORE EXISTING VEGETATION IN RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS. AND ACCESS TRACTS. 3. TRUCKS SHALL REMAIN ON PAVED SURFACES AT ALL TIMES. 4. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED AT AN APPROVED AND PERMITTED DISPOSAL SITE. 5. STOCKPIUNG ON SITE WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXISTING TENANT PARKING AGREEMENTS. IF ALLOWED, STOCKPILES MUST 8E COVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD DETAILS. CONSTRUCTION NOTE& PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT ONE -CALL (1-800-424-5555) FOR UTIUTY LOCATIONS. CONTACTS: OWNER:BILL ADAMS, I -FLY DESIGN PROJECT MANAGER: KIRK UTLEY, P.E. OR KEN NILSEN, P.E. 206 441-1855 DESIGN ENGINEER: STEVE MORALES, P.E. 206 441-1855 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE PER APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A SET OF APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ASSOCIATED PERMITS ON THE JOB SITE. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH. ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR A REVISION FOR ANY WORK NOT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITYS INSPECTOR(S) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK. ALL WORK IN ROADWAYS SHALL MEET TMC 11 AND THE FOLLOWING: A. PRIOR TO ANY ACTIVITY IN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION, ADDRESS AND DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW DURING THE WORK AND SHALL MEET MUTCD REQUIREMENTS. B. ALL WORK REQUIRING LANE CLOSURES MUST BE PRE -APPROVED. FROM THE THIRD THURSDAY IN NOVEMBER TO THE FOLLOWING JANUARY 2ND, THE DIRECTOR DOES NOT ALLOW LANE CLOSURES IN THE TUKWILA URBAN CENTER. C. FIRE, PEDESTRIAN, AND VEHICULAR ACCESS TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES, EXCEPT WHEN CONTRACTOR HAS PERMISSION FROM THE BUILDING OWNER AND THE DIRECTOR TO CLOSE AN ACCESS. D. ALL ROADWAYS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF DIRT AND DEBRIS USING STREET SWEEPERS. USE OF WATER TRUCKS FOR CLEANING ROADWAYS REQUIRES PREAPPROVAL FROM THE DIRECTOR. E. INSTALL STEEL PLATE OVER ANY TRENCH, AT ANY TIME WORK IS STOPPED AND THE TRENCH IS LEFT OPEN. Cali before you Dlg. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) PERMIT SET z O to 5 K 0 m 0 z 441 F. om = '3 0 op I -FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING TESC PLAN & CONSTRUCTION NOTES SCALE: AS SHOWN DESIGNED 8Y: DKU DATE: JULY 2010 CHECKED BY: KHN JOB NUMBER 10610.00 DWG NAME: P10610,EC SHEET C3 OF 5 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MSC) NOTES: 1. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) MEASURES ON THE APPROVED PLANS ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. 2. BEFORE BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ESTABLISH THE WORK OMITS, INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES. 3. BEFORE ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS, ALL DOWNSTREAM EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (ESC) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL ESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO ESC PLAN. 4. ESC MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL SITE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABUSHED. 5. FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL REMAIN UNWORKED FOR SEVEN DAYS OR MORE THAT CONTRIBUTE TO OFFSITE RUNOFF. 6. FROM OCTOBER I THROUGH APRIL 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO OFFSITE RUNOFF THAT WILL REMAIN UNWORKED FOR TWO DAYS OR MORE. IN ADDITION TO COVER MEASURES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL A. PROTECT STOCKPILES AND STEEP CUT AND FILL SLOPES IF UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 12 HOURS. B. STOCKPILE, ON SITE, ENOUGH COVER MATERIALS TO COVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS. C. BY OCTOBER 8, SEED ALL AREAS THAT WILL REMAIN UNWORKED DURING THE WET SEASON (OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30). MULCH ALL SEEDED AREAS. 7. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ESC MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE MAY RESULT IN THE WORK BEING PERFORMED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE DIRECTOR AND ASSESSED AS A UEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY WHERE SUCH FACILITIES ARE LOCATED. 8. DURING THE UFE OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND PROMPTLY REPAIR, RESTORE, OR REPLACE ALL PAVED SURFACES, DRAINS, STRUCTURES, VEGETATION, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, AND OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR THE DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE FEATURES, AND SHALL WITH THE DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITION RESULTING FROM PROJECT -RELATED WORK. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE PER APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ASSOCIATED PERMITS ON THE JOB SITE. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL FEDERAL STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS. 11. AS THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PER THE ESC PLAN AND SHALL INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES BEFORE ANY SITE DISTURBANCE OCCURS. BEFORE THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE REMOVED, INSTALL AND ESTABUSH THE UPSTREAM PERMANENT ESC MEASURES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROTECT SENSITIVE AREAS, THEIR BUFFERS, AND ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND PUBUC RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR EASEMENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING ANY WORK OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE, TO THE STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT, SENSITIVE AREAS, THEIR BUFFERS, AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: A. NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WITHIN 48 HOURS FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF ESC MEASURES. B. OBTAIN PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO MODIFYING THE ESC PLAN, C. MAINTAIN ALL ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER FACILITIES AS IDENTIFIED IN THE ESC PLAN. D. REPAIR ANY SITUATION OR EROSION DAMAGES TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND DRAINAGE FACIUTIES. E. INSPECT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED ESC INSPECTION SCHEDULE AND MAKE NEEDED.REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. 14. IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE PUBLIC STREETS AND PRIVATE PAVED PARKING / DRIVES SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN. SEDIMENT -LADEN STORMWATER SHALL NOT ENTER THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. 12. IT SHALL ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL RECEIVED 'JUL'07 2010+ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE GRATE GRATE FRAME SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS r 5" MAX TRIM FILTERE2/ WATER c • ° L.o DRAINAGE GRATE RECTANGULAR GRATE SHOWN OVERFLOW BYPASS BELOW INLET GRATE DEVICE • 1. . • EXISTING CATCH BASIN SECTION VIEW NOT TO SCALE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM (TYP.) NEW WATER METER WATTLE WITH SANDBAG ANCHOR, TYPICAL BELOW INLET GRATE DEVICE ISOMETRIC VIEW OVERFLOW BYPASS (TYP.) NOTES 1. SIZE THE BELOW INLET GRATE DEVICE (BIGD) FOR THE STORM WATER STRUCTURE IT WILL SERVICE. 2. THE BIGD SHALL HAVE A BUILT-IN HIGH-FLOW RELIEF SYSTEM (OVERFLOW BYPASS). 3. THE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM MUST ALLOW REMOVAL OF THE BIGD WITHOUT SPILLING THE COLLECTED MATERIAL. 4. PERFORM MAINTENANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATION 8-01.3(15). CATCH BASIN INSERT SCALE: NTS • NOTES 1 ON PAVED SURFACES, ANCHOR WATTLE WITH SAND BAGS. STRAW WATTLE DETAIL SCALE NTS 10 FT. MAXIM M EXISTING SIDEWALK ANCHOR WEIGHTS TYPICAL AXIMUM INCLUDE PLASTIC SHEETING BELOW STOCKPILE 3 FT. MIN PROVIDE PLASTIC WITH ANCHORS AT TOE. NOTES 1. TIRES. SANDBAGS, OR EQUIVALENT MAY BE USED TO WEIGHT PLASTIC SHEETING. 2. SEAMS BETWEEN SHEETS MUST OVERLAP A MINIMUM OF 12 IN. AND BE WEIGHTED OR TAPED. 3. PLASTIC SHEETING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 6 MIL 4. USE PLASTIC COVERING FOR ANY MATERIAL STOCKPILED ON SITE. PLASTIC COVERING FOR STOCKPILES DETAL SCALE: NTS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. HOLD THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING. 2. POST A SIGN WITH THE NAME AND PHONE NUMBERS OF THE ESC AND SITE SUPERVISOR. 3. CALL 1-800-424-5555 2 DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG FOR LOCATE OF UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES. 4. IMPLEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN DURING CONSTRUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY. 5. INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION. 6. POTHOLE LOCATED UTILTIES TO VERIFY UTIUTY DEPTHS AND CONDITIONS. IF UTILITY CONFLICT IS IMMINENT, CONTACT ENGINEER BEFORE CONTINUING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 7. SAWCUT AND REMOVE PAVEMENT. 8. DEMO BUILDING AND EXCAVATE FOR FOUNDATION. 9. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS AND MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 10. COVER EXPOSED TRENCHES WITH TEMPORARY STEEL PLATING DURING NON -WORKING HOURS. 11. CONSTRUCT NEW FACIUTIES. 12. PATCH AND SEAL TRENCHES ONCE STORM SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED. 13. REMOVE SEDIMENT, DEBRIS AND EQUIPMENT FROM ALL HARDSCAPE SURFACES. 14. REMOVE CATCH BASIN SOCKS AND CLEAN STORM SYSTEM AS NEEDED. DISPOSE OF SEDIMENT TO AN APPROVED LOCATION. CaII before you Dtg. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) PERMIT SET 0 0 0 N L.S 5 I-FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING r z w 0 < O N 0 X w zo Q TESC NOTES & DETAILS SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: JULY 2010 DESIGNED BY: DKU CHECKED BY: KHN JOB NUMBER 10610.00 DWG NAME: P10610_ECDET SHEET C4 OF 5 D. LEGEND: 177-7771 L- -:J ASPHALT REPAIR SAWCUT UNE DEMO EXISTING CURB -SD-3 STORM DRAIN PLUG FND MON IN CASE 3/4" PLUG W/PUNCH ELEV.=22.29(DN- 1 5) 4-7-10 55044 RIM --23.11 CL CHAN. B'CONC (N/S/E)=12.3 RECEIVED JUL' 0 7 2010' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANDOVER PARK WEST LANDSCAPE w 0- c r) z 26.29 26.18' S MONUMENT SIGN EXIST. SIDE WALK TUKWILA PARKWAY N88'38.48"E 477.96 II NEW 2" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE, SEE STANDARD DETAIL WS -03 FND MON IN CASE 1/2" PLUG w/PUNCH ELEV=2279 (0N- 1.0') 1\ 4-7-10 UIIL IRL: 8'W 045 RP CONNECT TO EXISTING CB SS 0 PM -25 T E 10 MP .w 20.7 / 11 1G LMH( 1' 'U 7 IC EI'CMP(o)-207- 77 o' rip REMOVE 2° DOMESTIC METER IN VAULT. 'CAP AND PL'UC OUTLET AFTER REMOVP)L SEE NOTE 2_ - SEE NOTE 1 10 (,F 8" CMP _._. -S=0.9% cex<a 6 2i t IT h 10 Cll (Li= 21.2 ! ... •:D BM 6 J NAIL IL & & WASHER EL=26.157 u f !HT NCH I I� P" IAIi W) ..',1-' . I IE=22 0 (S)` CB 1, TYPE CB RIM=MATCH EXISTING GRADE IE=22.10 (N/E) a-70 86 LF 8" CMP S=0.9% A SSMH RIM=24.48 CL CHAN. 8-CONC (E/W)-14.7 NEW 2" HIGH DENSITY - POLYETHYLENE. PIPE -011-0 2" COPPER _ c.toA DRIVEWAY___ -.- 6'OEC. NEW-TRANSFQRMERII-K :I NEVI LANSCARE SCILEN - 10 LF 8' LCPE S=0.9%'' 7 III IE=23.0 (S) 0 101 I 10 CMP(W11 127 14.3-' 40 (STING CONC. 5 CW E> ISTING CONG.(SIDEWALK Ic, ALL EXISTING PLANTER TOI BE PATCHED.TO MATCH EXISTING CONC. WALKWAY ' 23 43' ^.I;E TEE INTO EXISTING 2" DOMESTIC, AND ABANDON EXISTING UNE FROM VAULT (EXACT LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD) EXISTING BUILDING Y 27.05' FINISH FLOOR 2 1,907 5F TEMP. SPRINKLER MAIN TO EAST RETAIL SPACES, SEE MECHANICAL DRAWING (EXACT LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD) NEW EXTRUDED CURB (MATCH EXISTING) RELOCATE EXISTING IRRIGATION AS NEEDED NEW FACILITY HI PC EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK CB 1, TYPE 1 C8 RIM=MATCH EXISTING GRADE IE -22.90 (N/W) EXISTING BUILDING 27.05' FINISh FLOOR 9,222 5F I SEE NOTE 4. INSTALL 5" STORZ ADAPTOR ON HYDRANT fit HORIZ 0 10 20 40 Scale In Feet ks NEW LANDING W/ BENCH SEAT .2 SEE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN K 5 UTILITY NOTES: 1. RELOCATE EXISTING 2 -INCH WATER METER TO PROPERTY UNE. THE DOMESTIC WATER PRESSURE REDUCER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE LOCATED INSIDE BUILDING, SEE MECHANICAL DRAWING. 2. INSTALL LOCKING KNOX FDC PLUG ON EXISTING FDC (FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION). THE FDC PLUG SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY THE KNOX COMPANY. 3. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION OPERATIONS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL APPUCABLE SHORING LAWS FOR TRENCHES OVER 4 -FEET DEEP. ALL TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL MEET WISHA REOUIREMENTS. 4. INSTALL 5 -INCH STORZ ADAPTOR ON EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ALONG ANDOVER PARK WEST. 5. MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICE (SEWER, STORM, WATER, POWER AND COMMUNICATIONS) TO BUILDING TENANT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 6. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY UTIUTY CONNECTIONS AND PROVIDE FINAL CONNECTIONS PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES CROSSING PROPOSED STORM UNE SHALL BE POTHOLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. EAST AND WEST PARKING AREAS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ARE BASED UPON AS-BUILTS. NO SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN THIS AREA. - © PAINTED HIGH TENSILE D.I. SERVICE BAUULEWITH DOUBLE STRAP. AWWA I.P. THREAD TAP. ROMAC 202E OR EQUAL SIZE AS REQUIRED. 9, CORPORATION STOP AiA00 LP, INLET BY MALE IRON PIPE THREAD OUTLET. MUELLER BALL NO 8-2969 OR EQUAL AS NEEDED. ©COUPLING MALE IRON PIPE THREAD. BY MUELLER 110 FITTING, MUELLER N0. H-15451 OR EQUAL - (COPPER TUBING. TYPE K OR HIGH MOLECULAR DENSITY POLYETHYLENE. TRACING TAPE FOR POLYETHYLENE PIPE. NOTES: 1. SERVICE LINE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATERMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. BYPASS WILL BE LOCKED OFF BY. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR WIIEN METER SPREADER 13 INSTALLED. 3. METER WILL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA 4. SETTER SHALL BE POSITIONED TO CENTER RIGID SPREADER UNDER INSPECTION UD AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE BETWEEN. BYPASS AND BOX WALL FOR OPERATING AND LOCKING BYPASS VALVE. City of Tukwila SERVICE 1.13- 8 2"000054 C .eel. WS -03 mtwan st, 03.03 I B. SHELTON CaII before you Djg. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) PERMIT SET 0 0 0 00 0 0) N 0 01 3 W m z or O1 J 0W O O Lo S m Lo EH 28 0 03 I -FLY INDOOR SKYDIVING Z p UTILITY PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN ' DATE: JULY 2010 DESIGNED BY: DKU CHECKED BY: KHN JOB NUMBER 10610.00 DWG NAME: P10610_UT SHEET C5 OF 5 IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 30 THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. CODE INFORMATION APPLICABLE CODES ZONING CODE BUILDING CODE FIRE CODE ENERGY CODE MECHANICAL CODE PLUMBING CODE ELECTRICAL CODE ACCESSIBILITY CODE ELEVATOR CRY OF TUMMIA MUNICIPAL CODE CRY OF TUKWILA T.U.C. DESIGN REVIEW GUIDUNES 51-50 WAC WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE / 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 51-54 WAC / 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 51-11 WAC / WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE 51-52 WAC / 2006 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 51-13 WAC VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY NATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE/ INTERNATIONAL NEL GAS CODE 51-56 WAC / 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE THROUGHINTERNA I 6TIWAC 5ONAL 81-50N/ ASME REGULATIONS G CODE, ICC 2003 & APPENDIX E SECTIONS 101 USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION A-3 BUILDING WILL 8E P109011D AS MIXED OCCUPANCIES (2006 IBC SEC. 508) & NON -SEPARATED USES (500.3.2)RETAII (309.1) & ASSEMBLY (303.1) M BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS ALLOWABLE HEIGHT (TABLE 503) HEIGHT MODIFICATIONS (504) TOTAL ALLOWABLE HEIGHT HEIGHT PROVIDED ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA 3 4 STORIES 85' 4 STORIES 68'-9" ALLOWABLE AREA (TABLE 503) AREA MODIFICATIONS (506) TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA GROSS CONSTRUCTION AREA PROVIDED A-3 OCCUPANCY,(1-10) BASEMENT PLENUM GROUND LEVEL PLENUM DECK SECOND LEVEL OBSERVATION LOW ROOF DECK LEVEL SERVICE LEVEL (3,012) 5,779 5,306 3.012 3,012 TOTAL TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION M OCCUPANCY (RETAIL FLR I 2,030 TOTAL 2,030 SF 15,500 SF ♦200% FOR SPRINKLERS 46,500 SF 1YPE OF CONSTRUCTION (TABLE 602) FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS STRUCTURAL FRAME BEARING WALLS EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS EXTERIOR ON -BEARING WALLS INTERIOR FLOOR CONSTRUCTION ROOF CONSTRUCTION PERMITTED COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS (603) II A FULLY SPRINKLERED (FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS ANALYZED USING Al OCCUPANCY, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE USE) 1 -HR 2 HR < 5 FT SEPARATION I HR 5-10 FT SEPARATION 1 HR 10-30 FT SEPARATION NR > 30 FT SEPARATION 1 -HR 2 HR < 5 FT SEPARATION 1 HR 5-10 FT SEPARATION 1 HR 10-30 FT SEPARATION NR > 30 FT SEPARATION NR 1 -HR 1 -HR INSULATION (603.1.2) INTERIOR FINISHES EXTERIOR DISPLAY WINDOWS FRAMING < 15 FT ABOVE GRADE (603.1.6) PEXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS (603TITIONS WITHIN TENANT .1.10) SEE SEE SECTION 603 FOR ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES FIRE RESISTANCE RA1ED CONSIRUCRON EXTERIOR WALLS (TABLE 602) MAXIMUM AREA OF OPENINGS (TABLE 704.8) ALSO SEE SEC 704.8.1 FIRE WALLS (705) FIRE BARRIERS (706.3.7) SHAFTS & VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURES (707) FIRE PARTITIONS (708) SMOKE BARRIERS (709) SMOKE PARTITIONS (710) HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLIES (711) PENETRATIONS (712) FIRE RESISTANT JOINT SYSTEMS (713) STRUCTURAL MEMBERS (714, TABLE 601) OPENINGS FIRE RATING REQUIREMENTS (715) 2 HR FIRE WALLS 410 BARRIERS 1 HR SHAFT EXIT ENCLOSURE & EXIT PASSAGEWAY WALLS 1 HR FIRE BARRIERS 1 HR CORRIDOR WALL FIRE PARTITIONS OTHER 1HR FIRE PARTITIONS 2 HR EXTERIOR WALLS 1 HR EXTERIOR WALLS DRE WINDOW ASSEMBLIES DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS (716) OVERALL PROJECT PLUMBING SYSTEMS (WAC 51-50) < 5 FT SEPARATION 5-10 FT SEPARATION 10-30 FT SEPARATION >30 FT SEPARATION PROTECTED 0 TO 3 FT 3 T05 FT 5 TO 10 FT 10 T015 FT UNPROTECTED 0 TO 3 FT 3 T05 FT 5 TO 10 FT 10 T015 11 2 HR 1 HR 1 HR NR NOT PERMITTED 15: 253 45% NOT PERMITTED 15% 25% 45% 3 HR 2 HR 2 HR > 3 STORIES 1 HR I HR NR NR VARIES - VERIFY WITH SECTION 712 FOR ALL PENETRATIONS EOUAL TO RATING OF WALL EXCEPT NR WHERE UNRATED OPENINGS ARE PERMITTED 1 HR 1 1/2 HR 1 3/4RHR 13 HR 3/4 HR 1 1/2 HR 3/4 HR SEE SECTION 715.5 1 1/2 HR FIRE DAMPER RATING INTERIOR FINISHES REQUIRED INTERIOR WALL AND CEIUNG FINISH CLASSIFICATION (803.5) VERTICAL EXITS EXIT PASSAGEWAYS EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS ROOMS AND ENCLOSED SPACES REQUIRED INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH (804) FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 161E0100 FINISHES ANALYZED FOR MOST RESTRICTIVE USE A-3, FULLY SPRINKLERED SEE 804.5.1 FOR REQUIREMENTS IN VERTICAL EXITS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS AND ROOMS AND SPACES NOT SEPARATED FROM EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS BUILDING TO BE FULLY SPRINKLERED. MENTIS OF EGRESS PLENUM DECK LEVEL DESIGN BUILD FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. DESIGN BUILD FIRE ALARM SYSTEM UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT OBSERVATION LEVEL RETAIL SPACE OCCUPANCY A-3 FLOOR AREA -(CORE AREAS INCL STAIRS. SHAFTS. ELEVATOR AND RESTRMS OMITTED) OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR (1004,1.2) OCCUPANT LOAD EXITS REQUIRED (TABLE 1018.1) 11115 PROVIDED EGRESS WIDTH REQUIRED FOR STAIRS (0.2- PER OCCUPANT) EGRESS WIDTH PROVIDED AT STAIRS (INCL STAIR AT EXIST. PHASE I BLDG) MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE TO EXIT ALLOWED (1015.1) MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE TO EXIT PROVIDED 1.11611.1011 REONRED SEPARATION BETWEEN EXITS (1/3 OVERALL DIAGONAL) PROVIDED SEPARATION BETWEEN EXITS AREA OF REFUGE REQUIREMENTS AREA OF REFUGE PROVIDED 2,164 NET 15 NET (MOST RESTRICTIVE) 144 OCCUPANTS 2 MINIMUM 2 EXITS 29" 108' 250 FT 90' 92'/3=31 FT 85' YES YES A-3 3.081 NET 15 NET 205 OCCUPANTS 2 MINIMUM 2 EXITS 41' 108' 250 FT 68' 78'/3 = 26 FT 38 FT YES YES M 1.867 GROSS 30 GROSS 62 OCC.UPANTS 2 MINIMUM 2 EXITS NA MA 250 FT 56 FT 120/3 = 40 FT 111 FT NONE REQUIRED NO ENERGY EFFICIENCY FULLY HEATED/COOLED SPACE ROOF OPAQUE WALLS SLABS -ON -GRADE -FOUNDATION PERIMETER INSULATION OPENINGS OPAQUE DOORS VERTICAL GLAZING SHGC 148 WAIL & GLASS AREA5 WALL AREA GLASS AREA % GLAZING 37,140 SF 19,312 SF 52 % ROOF ASSEMBUES AND ROOFTOP STRUCTURES (CHAPTER 15) (COMPONENT PERFORMANCE) (MIN. INSULATION 0 -VALUES) R-21 R-25 R-10 (MAX. U -FACTORS) 0.60 0.29 SOLARBAN 60 TINTED (PPG CAMBIA) GLAZING AT FLRS 2-4 0.29 SOLARBNJ 60 CLEAR GLAZING AT FLR 1 .31 .54 REQUIRED DRE CLASSIFICATION (TABLE 1505.1) BASIC WIND SPEED CRITERIA FOR THE PROJECT LOCATION (FIGURE 1609) PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS CLASS C 85 MPH A-3 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANT LOAD MEN WOMEN ZONING 3,751-6,000 SF 2 WATER CLOSETS 2 URINALS 2 LAVATORIES 4 WATER CLOSETS 2 LAVATORIES LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE MINIMUM LOT SIZE MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE (7.) MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS: FRONT YARD SIDE YARD REAR YARD HEIGHT LIMITATION (NOT TO EXCEED IN FT) ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK 81 LESS ST. SITUATE IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TUKWILA URBAN CENTER (TUC) 100% 15 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 115 FEET 0 PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jif Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL: 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 INFORMATION 0 0 U SHEET: AOO I OF: SHEETS up t I4001' w}II- m - PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jif Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL: 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 INFORMATION 0 0 U SHEET: AOO I OF: SHEETS i �7! exist roof new roof new roof to match existing roof 5 Y E/13 1 r1 Af OPEN 70 BLOW a a—oc—x— u(—:— nc— L A Y R. I R At+ ROOF HATCH \� second floor 0.. LEGEND SUIT STORAGE 41I1IIdL 11�6P' meeting acc 238 sf 16 occupant's R R R >o -30—,b— 30 —310 ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE WALL ---1Y0—,w—rw- TWO HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE WALL EXIT IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' 5 30' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. fl I meeting space 460 sf 31 occupants gallery s ace 368 sf 25 occu ants retail space I ,867 sf 62 occupants lobby space 364 sf 25 occupan meeting space 521 5f 35 occupants II 2 — ,a KEY PLAN �9 V CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET fr '°B NO: 1009 Jf Jensen Fey 0 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 XE, 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 —_ PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 '°B NO: 1009 Jf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 XE, 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 m SAFETY PLAN SHEET: A002 OF: SHEETS TA -1 SHALL NOT PROJECT BEYOND FRONT EDGE OF WATER CLOSET AT PUBLIC TOILETS. EMPLOYEE TOILET AND ACCESSIBLE GUEST ROOMS. TOILET PAPER HOLDER RECESSED DUAL TOILET PAPER HOLDER RECESSED TISSUE DISPENSER RECESSED SHOWER CURTAIN ROD SURFACE MTD TOWEL SHELF WITH BAR SURFACE MTD GRAB BAR (TUB) SURFACE MOUNTED t 3.-0" TOILET kEAT � HEIGHT jl GRAB BAR (TOILET/2-WALL) SURFACE MOUNTED NOTE- PROVIDE FIRE-RETARDENT TREATED WOOD BLOCKING FOR ALL TOILET ACCESSORIES MOUNTED IN GYP. BD. PARTITIONS. MAJNTAJN INTEGRITY OF FIRE RATING WHERE ACCESSORIES ARE IN RATED WALLS. standard fixture mounting heights 1/4"=1'-0" 5 6 FACE OF FINISH 3'-0"MIN. 6 CU CLOSETS Id B ? CLEAR, MM. 3,-4" 54" MIN. IN i— WATER CLOSET barrier free guidelines and clearances 1/4-=1'-0" 3/4' CONTROL 801TON DIAMETER 7 \ 9 LINE OF SHOWER VALVE WALL GRAB BAR (TUB) SURFACE MOUNTED —GRAB BAR SUPPORT 250 LBS FORCE --TOILET TISSUE DISP. PER ANSI A117.1 SEC. 703.6.3.1 WIN ENTRY ROOK DOOR CLOSED DOOR OPEN EMERGENCY ALARM EMERGENCY STOP OCTAGON SYMBOL SFMLL BE RAISED BUT THE "8" 15 NOT. TYPICAL ELEVATOR CAP PLAN SCALE : 3/8' = I'-0' TrYIC*L ELEVATOR REOUIRIMENTS- Sr. COMPLY WITH ANSI -117.1-2003 CODE )) ) typical elevator accessible contract requirements NTS WOMEN .*:% 4'424,* f.44' restroom pictograms (min. requirements) 3" = 1'-0" 2 GRAB BAR (TUB) SURFACE MOUNTED t 2-6I I�LINEI OF WALL 3'-0" ` ELi `I ADDITIONAL LOWER HOOK IN ACC BATH ONLY GRAB BAR ROBE HOOKS (SHOWER/2-WALL) SURFACE SURFACE MOUNTED MOUNTED MH. M4v. DRINKING FOUNTAIN CLEARANCES NOTE Equipment permitted shaded area. NOTE The outomatk door reopening device is activated if an object passes through either *n* A or 6ne B. Lure A and Une B represent the vertical location of the door reopening device not requiring contact. uek RESTROOM °"ism° 13 m WALL HUNG TYPE URINAL PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER SURFACE MOUNTED t 1 1 MIRROR SURFACE MOUNTED • -LI 3mu 1-9 SAN. NAPKIN TOWEL D SP./ SANITARY DISPENSER WASTE RECEP. NAPKIN RECESSED RECESSED DISPOSAL RECESSED 111" Aon LAVATORY KNEE CLEARANCE/DEPTH LAVATORY FAUCETS: FAUCETS SHALL BE OPERABLE W/ ONE HAND 6 SHALL NOT REQUIRED TIGHT GRASPING. PINCHING, OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. THE FAUCET REWIRED TO ACTIVATE OPERABLE PARTS SHALL BE 5 LBS MAY. HAND -OPERATED, SELF-CLOSING FAUCETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN FOR 10 SECONDS MIN. CENTERED ON 1'-6" TACTILE CIiARACTEPS MIN. LOCATION OF TACTILE SIGNS AT DOORS HEIGHT OF TACTILE CHARACTERS ABOVE FLOOR OR GROUND office tactile sign location 1/4".1.-0" TYP. TRESHOLD FLOOR FINISH PER SCHEDULE door treshold detail 3" = 1'-0" N rn SHELF HOOK DRYING ROD MOP HOLDERS UTILITY SHELF WITH MOP AND BROOM HOLDERS SURFACE MOUNTED i TOWEL BAR FOLDING SURFACE SHOWER SEAT MOUNTED SURFACE MOUNTED MIRROR MULT -PURPOSE UNIT SOAP SURFACE MIRROR, SHELF AND DISPENSER MOUNTED SOAP DISPENSER SURFACE RECESSED MOUNTED IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 30' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. BABY CHANGING TABLE SURFACE MOUNTED /— WALL x4X+12" return plan TOP HANDRAIL EXTENSION @ STAIRS BOTTOM HANDRAIL EXTENSION @ STAIRS NOTE: I. HANDRAIL ASSEMBLIES AND GUARDS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESIST A LOAD OF 50 OLE 111631? DIRECTION AT TOP AND TO TRANSFER THIS WAD TIBLU SUPPORTS TO STURCIURE 2. OPEN GUARDS SHALL HAVE BALUSTERS OR ORNAMENTAL PATTERNS SUCH THAT A4* DIA SPHERE CANNOT PASS THROUGH ANY OPENING UP TO A HIGHT OF 34". EXIT LOCATION OF TACTILE SIGNS AT DOORS 15" 14" OD F t EXIT typical handrail extension @ stairs 1/4"=1'-0" O NY —44 7 I I FLOOR LEVEL L v L 4 FLOOR LEVEL SIGNAGE tactile sign adjacent to exit doors & level signage NTS GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY NOTES: 1. SHOWER HOSES MUST BE AT LEAST 60" LONG. 2. URINAL FLUSH CONTROLS SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND, SHALL NOT ROUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, PINCHING, OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST, AND BE MOUNTED NOT MORE THEN 44" A.F.F. 3. NOT USED 4. XZ"MAXIMUM HIGH THRESHOLD ABOVE FLOOR AND LANDING ON BOTH SIDES BUILDING ENTRANCE/ALL EDOORS. 5. INSURE 18" STRIKE SIDE x 60" DEEP CLEARANCE ON INT. DOORS. 6. INSURE 24" STRIKE SIDE x 60" DEEP CLEARANCE ON EXT. DOORS. 7. AT VESTIBULE, 48" MINIMUM CLEAR DEPTH 8. MPTAd PNI TO DOOR SWING. GRAB BARS MUST BE ABLE TO SUPPORT 450 lbs. MIN. APPLIED AT ANY POINT ALONG BAR. 10. SINGLE LEVER SHOWER WATER CONTROLS SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH A MAXIMUM FORCE OF 5 LBS. AND 11-10 CENTERLINE OF THE CONTROLS SHALL BE IN A REACH RANGE WITHIN 18 AND 24 INCHES FROM THE REAR EDGE OF THE SEAT. 11. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF THE SHOWER FLOOR SHALL BE Ys INCH PER FOOT (2? SLOPE) IN ANY DIRECTION. WHERE DRAINS ARE PROVIDED, GRATE OPENINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF Y4 INCH (6.4 MM) AND LOCATED FLUSH WITH THE FLOOR SURFACE.. PER SEC. 11158.6.2.4.4. 12. THE FORCE REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE WATER CLOSET AND URNAL FLUSH VALVE CONTROLS. AND FAUCET AND OPERATING MECHANISM CONTROLS, SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 5 LBS. 13. SELF-CLOSING FAUCET CONTPOL VALVES ARE ALLOWED IF THE FAUCET REMAINS OPEN FOR AT LEAST IO SECONDS. 14. NOT USED 15. TOILET ROOM FLOORS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD, NONABSORBENT SURFACE OF CONCRETE, CERAMIC TILE OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL EXTENDING UP THE WALLS AT LEAST 5 INCHES (127 MM). WALLS OF WATER CLOSET COMPARTMENTS AND WITHIN 24 INCHES (610 MM) OF THE FRONT AND SIDES OF URINALS SHALL BE SIMILARLY FINISHED TO A HEIGHT OF 48" (1219 MM). EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. MATERIALS USED IN SUCH WALLS SHALL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MOISTURE. n 8 o a lot 4' iimw 1 __ 111 DRAWN BY UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL 435.216.0316 FA, 4]5.]16.0329 511E01: A003 OF: SHEETS PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 IFLY - INDOOR SKYDIVJ ECEJVED "THE ANNEX @ SOUTH CENTER" 301 TUKWILA PKWY. OWNER: BILL ADAMS JUL 0720101 FIRE PENETRATION i MARK DATE DESCRIPTION © 2007 IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALP. SPACE HEATED BY FRICTION OF AIR MOVEMENT. TEMP CONTROLLED BY INTAKE/EXHAUST LOUVERS. R-13 CAVITY INSUL. + R-3.8 CONTINUOUS INSULATION R-25 ( ) ENERGY STUDY SECTION IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' 0 30 THEN DRAWINGI5 NOT TO SCALE. ( 2 1 ( I)5) SPACE HEATED BYFRICTION OF AIR MOVEMENT. TEMP CONTROLLED BY INTAKE/EXHAUST LOUVERS. ENERGY STUDY SECTION DRAWN BY, UKK CHECK DF NOTES PERMIT SET PLOT DATE. 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 IF, 425.216.0318 FA, 425.216.0329 51-122T) A005 OF: SHEETS DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION IF THE5E SHEET5 ARE NOT 24' X 38' THEN DRAWING 5 NOT TO SCALP. LEGEND I I EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED KEY NOTES CT) EXISTING FIRE SPRINKLER WATER SUPPLY TO BE RELOCATED CL EXISTING STEEL COLUMN TO BE REMOVED (-TN) EXISTING STOREFRONT TO BE REMOVED (-74 I EXISTING METAL CANOPY AND COLUMN TO BE REMOVED KEY PLAN PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTE5: PERMIT SET PLOT OATS: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 IFI: 425.216.0316 FAX: 425 216.0329 DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET: A I OO OF: SHEETS PL = 267.51' EXIST. SIDE WALK MONUMENT SIGN TU KWI LA PARKWAY 5. 158th STREET) EXIST. SIDE WAND''_, LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE 18 po5T. PAP,Y.ING G7'-4" LANDSCAPE 26.18' 20 EXIST. P RKI N 7 EXI T. PARKING EX15TING CONC. SIDEWALK EXISTING BUILDING 27.05' FINISH FLOOR 1 7 EXIST. PA JNG EXISTING CONC. SIDEWALK 4 E T. PATI KING EXISTING BUILDING 24.41' FINISH FLOOR 8,4 1 7 5F TOTAL EXISTING BLDG AREA: 39,79 I SF, 39,79 I X(3.3/ 1 000)= 13 I PARKING STALLS TOTAL 'FLY USUABLE BLDG AREA : 7,934 SF, = 26 PARKING STALLS TOTAL BLDG AREA: 47,725 SF TRASH NDSCA IF TNE5E 59E875 ARE NOT 24' X 3G' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. CHECK: SKIS PAR NG PERMIT SET -, 06/04/10 Aiill Immo 1n1► 141 i Aii PROPOSED AREA OF WORK 41 • NEW LANDING W/ BENCH SEAT ALL EXISTING PLANTER TO DE `•\PATCHED TO MATCH EXISTING CONC. WALKWAY EXISTING BUILDING 27.05' FINISH FLOOR 9,222 5F 8 4 EXI5TINGCONIC 5 E_WALK 23.43' 5 18 PL = 329.51' - 27'-0" _ *23.56' 20 EXIST PARY NG PL=450.0' LANDSCAPE ' TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: (I 3 I +26) = 157 STALLS TOTAL EXISTING PARKING (INCL. 5 HANDICAP STALLS): 154 STALLS a SITE PLAN O z is" = I'-0„ 0 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: 1 4* Ma 0 NOTES: PERMIT SET _-- 06/04/10 Aiill Immo 1n1► 141 —_ Aii DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 405 NO: 1 009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL: 425.216.0316 GI,: 425.216.0329 SHEET: A105 OF: SHEETS 20-0' M(41 UNE ABOVE WALL LINE ABOVE OPEN ABOVE---\ UNE OF SLAB ABOVE 10- I 1' OPEN ABOVE .". LINE Of SLAB ABOVE LINE OF SLAB ABOVE 550 OljE N ABOVE ° 3 WALL UNE ABOVE - ( PLENUM FLOOR LEVEL PLAN @- 1 2' - 7 1/4" 00012 BELOW OPEN 00 BELOW A OPEN 1'53' TO: 0 BELOW a 44 10 41 (05) • 10 2 ) E.L.2 3) 4 ) (4.4) 5 1 1 5.3) : 6 ) (-1 \ PLENUM DECK CONCRETE SLA E3 PLAN @4' - 5" 6z ' 1 /5" = 1 '-0" IPP O ),- CHECK: DF * PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 2013 NO: 1009 Jlf dmisommor Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 1EL: 425.216.0348 FAX: 425.216.0329 DRAWN By: UK.K. CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 2013 NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 1EL: 425.216.0348 FAX: 425.216.0329 TING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 PLENUM LEVEL PLAN SHEET: Al 10 OF: SHEETS C D • A13000 ABOVE I • CHK 2I ,-; r ry. • A SIM io w/ G. 5150 <15 4 '• • N ••••••-- I, • 4 • WALL TYPE PLAN ( 2j 1/5" = 1-0" G • A a• A • 2 2.2 3 ' , 3.4' 4.4 , 5 ‚5.3' 84-0 IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24 X 30 THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. 19,10' 0- 6 --- 11electrical room (existm to remam) A \ B 0 sprinkler room 114 G* --3,!2• • 'electrical room 113 I 161 Wornen's ,/ I ] room. .1_2777.) .)1 (.z) .....L refurn air tower 1 • • 18.-4' 1/Dorn -z I 'C.5 • hallway ( 112 — '? nr7 5'•2' prer kihe•T ji(8) 1. Server k(9,34 jar"Ur room -7 I closet( '9 oe, UP . • Rr 13'•3' -FuPtr, TO ABOVE mezzanine lobt-y ' 5 5 2 a= 11 .-"{IT ------- '1 01 J 1 co ' 9 ON DN mlet contractor Iy entry LJ ( L WAIVER too., hallway , ( 3 102 I n17 -- meeting return air tower Li• Aft w 1(91 N (-1 \ GROUND LEVEL - PLENUM DECK PLAN @+4'-5" i/&" = 1 '-0" 171 8 DRAWN 5Y: UKK CHECK: DF 14, op PLOT DATE: 00/04/10 2013 NO: 1009 ,.4400 IIIIiini Jensen Fe), ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE 11111 - r TEL 425.216.0318 FAX: 425216.0329 DRAWN 5Y: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES : PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 00/04/10 2013 NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fe), ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL 425.216.0318 FAX: 425216.0329 GROUND LEVEL - PLENUM DECK 5110E7: A I I 5 OF: SHEETS c WALL TYPE PLAN = J' -Q" •-x0.5! k 2 ‚4' , 5 ' ,5.3` ‚5.9' , 711-8' IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24 X 36 THEN DRAWING 5 NOT TO SCALE. 1-1o• ka'• . I eest roof new roof new roof to match exieNng roof , G.-31/2. D E 2 18,4' — 0 1 roof 1 1 ...... . ' return air tower men's -.. Tt ' room I 209 1 hallwa . ..; f.... -A0E11 \ ' snack) 1 209 1/ sales area I 208 I F LAT w WING --,, emergency star exit _ FUGHT CHAMBER g 5'• 5•VI. 4-0 of fice 203A I suit ' UP nde-12ef 200 1 ,31, - 1 207 - • 1[1-747,0-111,114;,ST40RAGE \(21b)1 °I1W111W1111Ut11.. RMAI (2---27 lb classroom 204 2031 \ E L.206 I team lounge •. 1 203 1 '11 return air tower 1 roof (0.5! , 2 ' 3 ' 4' , 5 x5.3' SECOND LEVEL - OBSERVATION DECK PLAN @+20'-9 3/4" 4,3 ‘174 I /8" = 1 '-0" PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK.: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 . 111 1 Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK.: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 TEL 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 SHEET: Al 20 OF: SHEETS IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. roof 1 roof I- 1 F roof L Roos HATCH. roof CONFIRM LOCATION AND\\ -- i 51.7E OF OPENING PER SVU.CO roof roof roof \0.5' ,21 3' LOW ROOF DECK LEVEL PLAN @+33'-2 3/4" ' / I /8" = 1 1_011 4 ,5' 5`3' 5 9' ,6' 8 0 k R CHECK: DF $ PLOT DATE 06/04/10 JOE NO: ° 1009 o I_ r__ JIf Z3 Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE DRAWN BY UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE 06/04/10 JOE NO: ° 1009 JIf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 TEL: 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 G ISSUE - 06/04/2010 w Cv 42232 ;1j ^^J W W U W c u_ 0 O 0 SHEET: Al 25 OF: SHEETS IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' 8 38' THEN DRAWING'S NOT TO SCALE. roof 1 \F E/ ROOM HATCO CONFIRM LOCATION AND SIZE OF OPENING_ PER SVLLCO • • <E e 1 / roof C ELT i F -2 C. roof I_ I y SERVICE LEVEL PLAN @+55'-1 1 1/2" 1I /8" = 1 I-0" (0.5! LI` 2 3 4 15l 8 O a CHECK: DF Mt Aidll. I/ M PLOT DATE. 06/04/10 'Oa NO: 1009 II l ilii PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DRAWN BY UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE. 06/04/10 'Oa NO: 1009 JIf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 SERVICE LEVEL PLAN SHEET: A130 OF: SHEETS 71'-6' 6'-3V2 I 'T s 16'-�V2 IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 38' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALP. D\E1 f CJI 18'-4' ice' roof C 1 roof 1 1 ,Pool; ItA.c1J CONFIRM LOCATION AND SIZE OF OPENING PER SVLLCO roof 1 CONFIRM LOCATION AND 517E OF OPENING PER SVLLCO roof 1 1 I ,2' 31 4 ' ,5' ROOF LEVEL PLAN @+68'-9 1/2" 1 /8" = 1 '-0" 15.3! 0.9! 61 n 8 zIiiik o k CHECK: DF P-- PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 0 111111 Jensen Fey o 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 a DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 LEL: 425.216.0316 FAX: 425.215.0329 V ROOF PLAN SHEET: A135 OF: SHEETS 8 1 C 9 3/4 1,21 0 0 • IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. ROOF LEVEL 0&-9 1/2' SERVICE DECK LEVEL 55-11 1/2' I I T 9 J UNDERGROUND PLENUM MID LEVEL LOW ROOF DECK 33' 2-3/4' SECOND OBSERVATION +20 9-3/4' PLENUM DECK +4' 5' GROUND LEVEL 0.0 PLENUM FLOOR -i2'- 7 1/4' BUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH (I G11= I '-0" KEY NOTES O METAL TRIM METAL CORRUGATED SIDING GLASS STOREFRONT (-4-) METAL ENTRY CANOPY 51 VENTILATION LOUVERS 6) EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR �1 WINDOW C.M.U.(Concrete Masonry Unit) CONCRETE BASE �0 SIGNAGE 1. 8 O k o CHECK: DF ' •11111► / pI 'Di NO: 1009 o Jf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE ' TEL 425.216.0316 FAX: *25.216.0329 PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DRAWN Br: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SST PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 'Di NO: 1009 Jf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL 425.216.0316 FAX: *25.216.0329 SHEET: A200 OF: SHEETS C> 'ME 8-'V 'P\E 0-'E8 19=38 'ME0'ES '0-1a '2-01 99'-5 I/41 74'-2 7/B' (7-2) 111 I11 11 lI11!1111 T} T --hili— _iiiiii ——hili �iM ilii ��� ��MMIi`_�iiii®i�i___i��M �S ii�iitlMii —iii—i-i---iii — SE ----- 11 -Zi lip--- iiiiii-----Z- i���ZiiiiiMi�i i iiMMUS -h— liiiii---- iiiiiiiiiii ii� iii MMii i• ii - ------iiiiiiiii i iiiiiiii MI --- ii-i—ii --- i iiii i iiiiiipii iiliiipiiii iiiiiii iii NE iiiii—i—i�ia! i ii iii�i�iMii�iMZiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiii iii�ii� 1. : Y 11111 �i��l�iii�—•IMM Zi���i=Q�_E_ -�� �_MI VI gn �11t_ MUM iiSII iZi— iliiiii iZiiii��i iiiZiOiii ii�iZ ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii_i_i�iiiiiiiiiii�_p_ MMI piiM= iZi iiiiiiiiii—�Z _I NISiiZ�iii ii pi 11111 i i Z�--i--®------- --- - MINS i ... MOM! MINIM - iiiiiMEM MUM/ —��Zi�Ziiiii�=i��iZi�iiiZiiiiiii _ iiNI iiiiiiiiM — � � % Ziiiii—iiM=i�i�=l=�i> MMi��i —iii WMANM iiiilii—i=ii—iiia iiiiiiiiiiiii airi EXISTING RETAIL IN FRONT IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' 8 38' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALP. ROOF LEVEL 68'-9 1/2' SERVICE DECK LEVEL 55'- 1 I 1/2' MID LEVEL 45-9' LOW ROO` DECK 33 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR/ OBSERVATION +20 9-3/4' UNDERGROUND PLENUM PLENUM DECK 4 +4' 5' GROUND LEVEL 0.0 PLENUM FLOOR -12'-71/4' BUILDING ELEVATION - WEST 3/ 11 = 1 1 -oil 16 KEY NOTES OI METAL TRIM X21 METAL CORRUGATED SIDING X31 GLASS STOREFRONT METAL ENTRY CANOPY (-5--) VENTILATION LOUVERS (---6-Th EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR WINDOW ( Th C.M.U.(Concrete Masonry Unit) (I -9 -Th CONCRETE BASE 1�0) SIGNAGE 0- 8 a CHECK: DF inb 4* 111 1 0 '°B "°, 1009 3 J'f' Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 1111) REDMOND. WA 98052 1EL 423.218.0318 FAX: 435.215.0329 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 '°B "°, 1009 J'f' Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 1EL 423.218.0318 FAX: 435.215.0329 PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 BUILDING ELEVATION SHEET: A205 OF: SHEETS EXIST. ROOF 3 1 3 ] ( 2 ) 10 )i 2 I 11 I ! I ' . I ! I"! 1 ! /8‘ 1 ; / I . : 12-63/4.. ! , ! 1; I , 11'H 2 63/4 171:7_ II= ( 11 X• 1 1 Aft 8 ( AA) 1 I 1 I .1111 III 1111 III Jill I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 1 111 1 t 11 1 I 1 1 I 1 11 I 1 I I 1 1 1111!! 7 1 I 111 1.111111 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1111111 11111111 I 111111E11 1 I I 1111 1 1 I 1 I 1 1111111111 I I 1 111111117 1 ;1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24 X 30 THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. ROOF LEVEL G5-9 1/2' SERVICE 0585 18581 ;43 55-11 I/2' EXIST. ROOF MID LEVEL 4!, 45-9' LOW ROOF DECK 33' 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR/ OBSERVATION r 1 I 4/ UNDERGROUND PLENUM L +20 9-3/4' PLENUM DEO. +4' 51 GROUND LEVEL 4, 0.0 PLENUM FLOOR 43 -12-7 1/4' BUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH ( I ) 34G" = I '-0" KEY NOTES METAL TRINVGAP (Th METAL CORRUGATED SIDING 131 GLASS STOREFRONT METAL ENTRY CANOPY I-3—) VENTILATION LOUVERS 4----aTh EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR WINDOW 8 ) C.M.U.(Concrete Masonry Unit) CONCRETE BASE 1--10) SIGNAGE (TM) NEW SERVICE DOOR (SEE DOOR SCHEDULE) SMOOTH STUCCO PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 1- 8 18 kk Ilr 411110 44111b t"mm IIIII FABO 1 DRAWN BY UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE 06/04/10 JOS NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 w Lu SIIEET: A2 1 0 OF: 595815 74'-2 718' 12'-7 I/8' ( 2 ) 1�� 111 1 11 1 1 11 `7 ---1 T`T 1 . 1 ------------- I 1i11II1I11I 1 {ii it {I� -f----1- 1111- 11 ';1 111 11 111 1 1) tI --- . .... t.1 1 11.1 { 1 1}3i-1 7VII ITTl L 1I�TTT I7l —7Lr 1L ..f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ( I LT L1.. .. }Ti{ 1 11 1 f 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ! I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 EXISTING RETAIL IN FRONT IF THE5E SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 30 THEN DRAWING 5 NOT TO SCALE. ROOF LEVEL 4-15 08'-9 1/2' SERVICE DECK LEVEL 55-11 1/2' MID LEVEL 45, 45-9' LOW ROOF DECK 33' 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR/ I VAT OBSERVATION +20 9-3/4' UNDERGROUND PLENUM PLENUM DECK 4 +4' 5' GROUND LEVEL 0.0 PLENUM FLOOR 415 -12 - 7 1/4' BUILDING ELEVATION - EAST 34G" = 1 1-00 KEY NOTES METAL TRIM O METAL CORRUGATED SIDING O GLASS STOREFRONT METAL ENTRY CANOPY VENTILATION LOUVERS (1E) EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR WINDOW C.M.U.(Concrete Masonry Unit) U CONCRETE BASE CDSIGNAGE n 8 O DRAWN 5Y UKK CHECK: DF NOTES PERMIT SET PLOT DATE. 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 1E1.: 425.216.0316 FAX: 425,216 0329 PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 • lJ J W z 0 W 111 CD CD SHEET: A215 OF: 511E05 ID . ):Jvilli 41111101 o It V 0 i DRAWN 5Y UKK CHECK: DF NOTES PERMIT SET PLOT DATE. 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 1E1.: 425.216.0316 FAX: 425,216 0329 PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 • lJ J W z 0 W 111 CD CD SHEET: A215 OF: 511E05 (;) -*) rn Es Qz 1.1 1.•-• 41=11:--11Arr-1111.1174114.1111 11=1-411.11=1.11=1=11=11-11-11=1— I PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 0 U3 o IFLY - INDOOR SKYDIVI "THE ANNEX @ SOUTH CENTER'1 EIVED 301 TUKWILA PKWY. BILL ADAMS OWNER. JUL 07 2010 fQMMUNITY OEVELORVENT SECTION 6 4 0 0 5 0 0 7' 0 + MARK DATE DESCRIPTION © 2007 IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24 2 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. ( 5 ) 23,0 3/4. ( 4 ) c ( 3 ) >6 I /,fr 4.- 10. I • <:.,5 • CONFIRM LOCATION AND 506 OF OPENING PEE 40500 REMOVABLE ROOF HATCH • 5 • ( 2 ) 23.-o 3/4. 1 0-5' CONFIRM LOCATION AND 5106 OF OPENING ITIF SVLLCO REMOVABLE P.00F HATCH I/2. ( I ) 10 71-3/58 SHEETS ARE NOT 24 /1 30 THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. 7-6 7/6' (0.5) FANS 4 DUCTS SVLLCO TURN VANE TURN VANE I SVLLCO SVLLCO FANS 4 DUCTS SVLLCO • 810 VEffl SVLLCO L 11 DIP 5V 5ER _CO OPEN RETURN AIR TOWER PLI CH BER 5V LCO BAR 4. LOUNGE 1-7 1 . I, - i ,t L17Ai:VENT : SVLLCO • • 1 __ _4 L.. 1 \ •., I '4W RETURN AIR TOWER TOP OF PARAPET 69-9 1/2' ROOF LEVEL 0-9 1/2' SERVICE DECK LEVEL 55-1 1 1/2' MID LEVEL 45-9' LOW ROOF DECr MEETING ROOM ELECTRICAL ROOM PLENUM PLENUM ':- Th DR, SUMP DRY SUMP LJ 23 .6 1 llr-f•.,l1 3/' r • =10 . ir 1dlA 111 11 it pDSECTION 34G. = 1 LQ" 33' 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR/ OBSERVATION +209-3/4' PLENUM DEG. +4 5' GROUND LfVEL 0.0' PLENUM FLOOR -12' - 7 1/4' a —---- UKK CHECK: VIII 74I 111111 400) - PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 (TING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 PERMIT DRA DRAWN BY, UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL 425215.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 0 LLJ SHEET: A305 OF: SHEETS () 4' 53) ICY -5. -r 231.03/4' 20-2. IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 38' THEN DRAWING 5 NOT TO SCALE. ( 2 ) ) (0.5) 23.03/4 SECTION ( 0 „ I G - -U" ( A ) ( 5 5 112 C ) TOP OF PARAPET 35' 2-3/4' LOW ROOF DECK 35 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR/ OBSERVATION +2a 9,3/4' PLENUM DECK +4' 5' GROUND LEVEL • 1 o's 1 ill=1111•11111111111111111111 tr on 40 PLOT DATE 06/04/10 30590; 1009 1 Jlf 44:7 ,... ::I:gAz ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING - REDMOND, WA 98052 1EL 425.216.0318 FAA 425.216.0329 -- -4--- ...: -'--"' ‘,31,'-• . - , k P:DILA1 0 ER10. 3 - . ; ' ':- ---- • „ n.:,:::: -1'. 1 .•.; - ---- ',.. _ ‘-x • L, 44443 rh :ti,44,-.4. i, AI • ' a SECTION / 34G" = Lou PLENUM DECK +4'-5' GROUND LEVEL PLENUM FLOOR+ -12 -7 1/4' PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 ,P ,,- CHECK: DF tr on 40 PLOT DATE 06/04/10 30590; 1009 1 Jlf 44:7 Jen sen Fe ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING - REDMOND, WA 98052 1EL 425.216.0318 FAA 425.216.0329 DRAWN NT UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE 06/04/10 30590; 1009 Jlf Jen sen Fe ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 1EL 425.216.0318 FAA 425.216.0329 0 C.7 z p) v) @.) (r)L4 f- -1: cflOic 0 uJ SHEET: A3 1 0 OF: SHEETS i (53) giVP II LOTH IC iCr 1 ICI 1-11 0I T IrI �1 II OK1111r14C1 nl 1 II IFI 1 IJII 1,1,01�I 141 O�Ife 7' 1. i �r "s n r n i' u Ir nor-IL11�iIg> II I -, " vIlw* ISI 410 1.uw 1141 1➢N Irl Irk 1 'r is � JFI ul�l"I��Ipp����I=�Im�1 n lI LCFIIr�11RWik1 r1 'Ag -TR ICICI n I tar- IIc. l 1°n -n =1.44. WALL SECTION 3/8"= I' -(Y IOW ROOF DECK 33' 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR 20 9-3/4' +4' 5' 0 0' PLENUM DECK GROUND LEVEL <6• Alf Ef151ING ADJ44 251 RE -Ail SPACE 5 . WALL SECTION LOW RWF "CC 33' 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR +OBSERVATION DECK 20 9-3/4' +4' 5' 3/8"= I'-0" PLENUM DECK GROUND LEVEL WALL SECTION 3/8"= I'-0" IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. LOW ROOF DECK ' 23/4' SECOND FLOOR +OBSERVATION DECK 20 9-3/4' RENUM DECK q' S• GROUND LEVEL GROUND LEVEL 0.0 SECOND FLOOR +OBSERVATION DECK 20 9-3/4' EXISTING ADJACt5< RETAIL SPACE 4 1 WALL SECTION 3/8"= I'-0" 8 0 0 __._4!P Itbeir tio ®iil .... I • iiNI 1 1 d3 4 t- 1 II LOTH IC iCr 1 ICI 1-11 0I T IrI �1 II OK1111r14C1 nl 1 II IFI 1 IJII 1,1,01�I 141 O�Ife 7' 1. i �r "s n r n i' u Ir nor-IL11�iIg> II I -, " vIlw* ISI 410 1.uw 1141 1➢N Irl Irk 1 'r is � JFI ul�l"I��Ipp����I=�Im�1 n lI LCFIIr�11RWik1 r1 'Ag -TR ICICI n I tar- IIc. l 1°n -n =1.44. WALL SECTION 3/8"= I' -(Y IOW ROOF DECK 33' 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR 20 9-3/4' +4' 5' 0 0' PLENUM DECK GROUND LEVEL <6• Alf Ef151ING ADJ44 251 RE -Ail SPACE 5 . WALL SECTION LOW RWF "CC 33' 2-3/4' SECOND FLOOR +OBSERVATION DECK 20 9-3/4' +4' 5' 3/8"= I'-0" PLENUM DECK GROUND LEVEL WALL SECTION 3/8"= I'-0" IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. LOW ROOF DECK ' 23/4' SECOND FLOOR +OBSERVATION DECK 20 9-3/4' RENUM DECK q' S• GROUND LEVEL GROUND LEVEL 0.0 SECOND FLOOR +OBSERVATION DECK 20 9-3/4' EXISTING ADJACt5< RETAIL SPACE 4 1 WALL SECTION 3/8"= I'-0" 8 0 0 __._4!P Itbeir tio ®iil .... I iiNI DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE. 06/04/10 JOS NO: 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 1EL 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 WALL SECTION SHEET: A315 OF: SHEETS (GRID /2' 51/2' 6X6 STRUCTURAL STEEL COWMN 2X2 TUBE STEEL 1682) 7/8' AAT CHANEL 5/8' TYPE ^P GYP BD. FLUSH WITH FACE OF CONC. WALL BELOW BUILDING PARER ON 5/8' DENS -GLASS GOLD BD. CORRUGATED METAL EXTERIOR FIN511 (SEE SPECIRCAIION) 5/8"'EWE '3' GYP B0. FLUSH WITH FACE OF CONC. WALL BELOW FACE OF CONC. WALL BELOW FACE Cr CAN:. WALL BELOW STRUCTURAL BRACING STRUCTUPAL COWMN TO FLUSH WITH FACE OF TUBE STEEL 2-)4 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN 3/4"= I '-0" RID) 16 I/7 I/21, CORRUGATED METAL EXTERI08 25511 (SEE SPECIFICATION) STRUCTURAL COWMN 2X20 TUBE STEEL WELDED 10 COULMN FACE 7/8. 11AT CHANEL 5/8' TYPE 7(' GYP BD. BUILDING PARER ON 5/8' DENS -GLASS GOLD BD. GALVANIZED METAL CAP WITH WEEP HOLE A5 NEEDED PLENUM DECK 4' 5' WALL SECTION GROUND LEVEL 0.0' 3/4"= I '-0" 3 WALL SECTION CORRUGATED METAL EXTERIOR 285H (SEE SPECIFICATION) STRUCTURAL COWMN 2X28 TUBE 5TEEL WELDED TO CWLMN FAGS 7/8' HAT CHANEL 5/8' TYPE Sr GYP BD. BUILDING PARER ON 5/8' DENS -GLASS GOLD 22. 100 00 LONG. BEAM rr GALVANIZED METAL CAP WITH WEEP HOLE AS NEEDED PLENUM DECK 4' S' CONC. WALL GROUND LEVEL 0.0 3/4"= I '-0" IF T11E5E SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. I/2". t/2', 6 I/2' CORRUGATED METAL EXTERIOR HN5H (501 SPECIFICATION) STRUCTURAL COWMN 202X TUBE STEEL WELDED TO COW" FACE 7/8' HAT CHANEL 5/8' TYPE'8' GYP BD. i- BUILDING PARER ON 5/8' DENS -GLASS GOLD BD. GALVANIZED METAL CAP WITH / WEEP HOLE A5 NEEDED PLENUM DECK -. ..... 4' 5' 5 I /2' CONC. WALL WALL SECTION GROUND LEVEL 0.0 3/4"= I '-0" PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE 06/04/2010 r 8 0 O L CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET ra °B "°, 1009 O Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 6 4 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 °B "°, 1009 Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 70: 125.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 WALL SECTION SHEET: A320 OF: SHEETS (9 �,I m —i 5.43,X4• Stair K+4'-5' elevator lobbv'- ELEVA!08 +711 elevator lobby 1 0. PLENUM DECK +0,00.. 5LA3 a I/4"= I'-0" H11El11'41-111 •TI 1'.311 ]11 =III T •TI ' i :11 E111 ?rn:PETE OVE8 FILL) .II 'ill I. snack bar 205 1 31 22� E0. 11 u E:. EO. 60. elevator lobby /2_,stair - section I /4"= I'-0" (3) SECOND FLOOR/ OBSERVATION DEO' +20,9 - T.O. STAIR LANDING + 13'-10X4' T.O. PLENUM +4'-5 DECK (3) (0.5) RETAIL SPACE 7 exterior emergency exit stair - section 1/4"=I'0 5'-a b +13'-10X4' LANDING mez2anme lobby 1 101 y stair LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE I /4"= I'-0" ROOF g EXIT 5TAIF. +30'-344 SECOND FLOOR/ OBSERVATION DECK } +20-s?; FTS 1.0. 5T52R LANDING +9' T.O. STAIR LANDING +4'-5 T.O. SLAB a-0 D 4. STLO 20 STUD stair section IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24. 1L 36' THEN DRAWING I5 NOT TO SCALP. 20-5 ROOF 5 EXIT STAIR An +30'-3' SECOND FLOOR/ OBSERVATION DECK T.O. PLENUM DECK +4'-5 T.O. SLAB 0511 /4"= I'-0" ( D ) (E) Y .I --10 222 L NENN.; 9,5' 090 2) -(3 ) UNE 0` WALL ABOVE 3 D': 012 LANDING 7'=1 stair I/4"= I'-0° 1` 8 0 O V CHECK: DF ii011! �, 4.,11 IIII PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 °B "°: 1009 o — — .i?Iit 11111 — --.-am limoo / i 1-- 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 °B "°: 1009 JIf. Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 TELL 425.216.0318 FAX; 425.216.0329 > N zr. w o • ▪ ig z '-' _� 0E O Caw 0— o U !—' W cn �W D z SHEET: A500 OF: SHEETS RETURN ENDS —I 1/2' DIA STANDARD PIPE AT STAIR I, 1 1/4' DIAMETEP. STANDARD PIPE — OWALL MOUNTED SECTION handrails BRACKETS AT 5-0" 0.CC MAX. © FRAMED WALLS, FASTEN TO METAL BACKING OR WOOD BLOCKING. g CONCRETE OR MASONRY WALLS, FASTEN WITH EXPANSION BOLTS F.O. FINISH WALL 14%9 BALUSTERS (g 4' MAX. SPACING 1 I/2' DIA STANDAED PIPE AT STAIR 1 , 1 1/4' DIAMETER STANDARD PIPE TREAD DIM. FT. — COMPOSITE CONCRETE DECK s - 114' PARALLEL FERF5. SPACED 1' AFAPT PROVIDE DARK/LIGHT COLOR CONTRASTING CAREDRUNDUM INSERTS CONCRETE FILL, TR. n J3'= rail detail 11—'-1 I'-0" VERTICAL POSTS AT I O'-0" OC / MAXIMUM I I�' CLE R OFLOOR MOUNTED SECTION ,----- STEEL BEAM PEP STRUCT. EXTENSION DIM. PT. C c ) return plan 3'= I'-0' NUMBER OF TREADS 4, I'O CLEAR , I TREAD MARIE; PER PLANS I 000130N SHOWING, 0 I _1 ----- / d 1 WLll-MOUNTED HANDRAIL stair w/ separate handrails $ guards IO ELEAF I TREAD eg HANDRAIL SUPPORT AT GUARDRAIL POSTS 0) CONCRETE SLAB nosing detail 3'=I'0' STAIR STRINGER CHANNEL OR FLAT PLATE DIMENSION POINT AT 5TA18 PLANS stringer $ wall detail 3'= I'-0 HANDRAIL OPEN 6' RAUNGS AND STRINGER/ OCLOSURE Al INSIDE TURN - PLAN r7) GUARD TINILAS 10. 10 stair details 6L OBAIUNUT Al TOP FLOOR - PLAN 1 I/T= I'-0' --APPROXIMATELY EOUAL BALUSTER SPACING, 4' MAXIMUM RAILV16i AND 5101VGER 0 rLOSOFE 01 RODE TUPN - PLAN FLOOR STAB OR LANDING (LANDING SHOWN) 41.TION AT 1 1 (B) BOTTOM FLOOR (.9 SECTION A' INTERMEDIATE FLOOR • 'I RAILINGS AND STRINGER OCLOSURE AT INSIDE TURN - ELEVATION -/0 Lk II I T , I 1 Jj 3' AT FLOOR 51X8 -HANDRAIL EXTENSION VARIES PER PLANS = 0l SECTION AT TOP FLOOR END POSTS AND INTERMEDIATE POSTS OF 1 I /4' NOMINAL STANDARD PIPE, AT 50 OC MAXIMUM BALUSTERS IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' X 30 THEN DRAWING 5 NOT TO SCALE. u POSTS WELDED TO STEEL OR EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE 2'MAXIMUAH u NR 1 4L, u WHERE(8 I WELDED _ 8 z 0 a o ..01, 'l, Ildia 1111 4iD mood "°or �1 -- i DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE) 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 JIf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 100: 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 STAIR DETAILS SHEET: A505 OF: SHEETS SEE INTERIOR UNE OF WALL BEYOND ELEVATION FOR FINISH FIDOR PM5H BY MIAMI FLOOR SIRUCTUR` ELEVATOR SILL AND SUPPORT BY ELEVATCR CONTRACTOR OFFSET LEG TOP TRACK WALL TYPE PER PIAN CLEAR HOISIWAY elevator door sill lir=l�-o' O j OL o o =O0 VIII 1111 VIII c O0 METAL FRAME JAMB PACK W/ I' G'NB AMER AS REGO TO MAINTAIN PRI: RATING 241R RATED SHAFT WAU ENCLOSURE PLAN SECTION v STEEL BEAU - SEE STRUC. (44 elevator door iamb I/2'= '-0' 50 I'9 °00o = 0 0 °x; 00 O 0 WATERPROOF A EMBRANE STEEL GRATING (:ONTIN000S 2 I/2'X I I/2'X 5/16' ANGLE W/ 3/8' DIAMETER TXPANSION ANCHORS (2) EACH SIDE :'cUMP PT - SEE STRUCTURAL CONCRETE NM Mill.M1111•1111, '11.1•14111111V•11•1•••• 0 DIM PT 2 OR RATED 51AFT WALL 1NCL05U2 CLEAR HOISTWAY PACK W/ 1' GYM AMER AS RECJD TO MAINTAIN PRE RATING METAL. FRAME JAMB BEYOND elevator door head 1 I/2'= I'-0' i2 TH222 51 i22TS :.w RCT 24 3G 711CN ORA':.ING .0 NCT TO .;CRL2. N1 5. 8 DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF 11, 1 PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 o -4,s' No■ moi. 4■' F� Jensen Fey DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 JIf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 la: 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216.0329 ELEVATOR DETAILS 5112E7: A5 1 0 OF: SHEETS DETAI L 1 I /2'=1'-0' DETAI L I I/2'= I' 0 0 0 0 2 DETAI L I I I2'= I'-0' 5,a)DETAI L 1 I/2'=1'{Y DETAI L I I /2'= DETAI L 1 I/2'= I'-0' 13 DETAI L I I/2'= I'-0' 4 DETAI L L L I /2'= I'-0' DETAI L I I/2'= I'-0' DETAI L l DETAI L I 1/e=1.-0' DETAIL O/ l /2'= I'-0' 1 I/2'=1'-0' DETAI L I I/2'= I'-0' / c DETAI L I 112'= I'-0' II" DETAI L I I/2'= I'-0 J/6 DETAI L I1/2'=1'-0' \� DETAI L I lie= I'-0' DETAI L 1 I/2'= I'-0' IF THESE SHEETS ARE NOT 24' 5 36' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. WATERPROOF MEMBRANE CONCRETE • STEEL DECKING CONTINUOUS 2 I/2" 6 I I/2' 5/16' ANGLE W/ 319' DIAMETER B(PAN5106 ANC1OR5 (2) EACH 510E DETAI L I I/2'= DETAI L I /2'= I'-0' DETAI L 1 I/2'= I'-0' DETAI L I /2'= I'-0' PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE - 06/04/2010 DESCRIPTION 1 CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 'OB "°, 1009 •ice Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 'OB "°, 1009 Jlf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 " REL 425.216.0318 FAO 425.216.0329 MISCELLANEOUS SHEET: SHEET: A515 OF: SHEETS CONCRETE SEALER CONCRETE SEALER PAINTED/SPAYED • PAINTED/SPAYED ON SURFACE. ON SURFACE. 10 MIL. VAPOR ,— 4' CONCRETE SLAB PER BARRIER -i��711 I I I.. II I ..II117. IIS�1111=11,T11f-11111= PLENUM SLAB CONCRETE SEALER PAINTED/SPAYED ON SURFACE. PLENUM TOP SLAB STRUCTURAL 0 MIL. VAPOR BARRIER SUB -BASE PER 501L5 REPORT SLAB ON GRADE MEMBRANE R.00FING R-25 RIDGED INSULATION W/ PROTE ION BOARD CONCRETE SEALER PAINTED/SPAYED ON SURFACE. I' RIGID INSULATION W/ VAPOR BARRIER PLENUM WALL BELOW GRADE ITE METAL WITH CONCRETE. N DECK PER RAL DWG. PER STRUCTU • L DWG. — NULUFIRE 5000 SERVICE ROOF DESKF COATING > 1–HOUR F.R.: ULa D936 ;;; — COMPOSITE METAL DECKING WITH CONCRETE. Lo DECK PER RAL DWG. STEEL B-• PER STRUCTURAL DWG NULLIFIRE 5005 FIREPROOF COATING FLOOR DECK \ $p.\ 1– HOUR 935; UL# N609 FORUUNR RESTRAINED BEAMS CONCRETE SEALER TO BE APPLIED ON BOTH SIDE OF CONC. EXPOSED PLENUM WALL /2' PROTECTION BD. MEMBRANE ROOFING R-25 RIDGID INSULATION 3/4" FIRE -TREATED PLYWOOD SHEATHING 0 METAL STUD @ 10' O.C. (2) LAYERS 5/8' TYPE 'X" GYP BD. ROOF @ EXIT STAIR > 1–HOUR F.R. – GA FILE NO. UL# X536 EXPOSED 8' CMU WALL EXPOSED C.M.U. DEMISING WALL 2–HOUR F.R. – GA FILE NO. UL# U436 AND GA#WP8250 (PROVIDE 2 HOUR), SIM. TO GA# WP9020 P.-25 RIDGED INSULATION W/ • WATER PROOF MEMBRANE • (2) 3/4' FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD NULLIFIRE 5005 N DECK PER RAL DWG. PER STRUCTURAL FIREPROOF COATING ROOF DECK NON–RATED CEMENT PLASTER WITH MESH LATH 1' RIGID INSULATION WATER PROOF MEMBRANE ON 5/8' WATER PROOF GYP 130. 6' METAL STUD @ 10" O.C. R-13 BATT INSULATION 5/8' TYPE 'X' GYP BD. NULLIFIRE 5005 FIREPROOF COATING WIDE FLANGE COLUMN 1–HOUR F.R.: ULg XD935;> > ONE HOUR (MIN.) FIRE RATING: UL# X629 \ Q UL# N609 FOR UNRESTRAINED BEAMS 5/8' WATER PROOF GYP BD. 4 METAL STUD @ 16' 0.C. R-13 BATT INSULATION 4" STUD INT. WALL (W/ INSULATION) ONE HOUR (MIN.) FIRE RATING: UL# 485 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP BD. 6 METAL STUD © I G" O.C. R-13 BATT INSULATION 5/8" TYPE "X" GYP BD. 6" STUD INT. WALL (W/ INSULATION) ONE HOUR (MIN.) FIRE RATING: UL# 465 5/8' TYPE 'X GYP BD. 4 METAL STUD @ 10" O.C. CORRUGATED METAL EXTERIOR FINSH (SEE SPECIFICATION) (2) LAYERS 00 MIN. BUILDING PAPER I' RIGID INSULATION 5/8" GLASS MAT GYPSUM SHEATHING 6' METAL STUD @ 16' O.C. R- (3 BATT INSULATION 5/8' TYPE "X" GYP BD. IF THESE SHEETS T 24' X 30' THEN DRAWING 15 NOT TO SCALE. EXTERIOR WALL EXISTING GYP BD. 4 WALL ASSEMBLY TO REMAIN (2) LAYERS 60 MIN. BUILDING PAPER 0/ NEW GYP SHEATHING ON EXISTING WALL ASSEMBLY I' AIR GAP (OR AS REQ. TO CLEAR EXISTING BEAM) 8" FULLY GROUTED CMU WALL NEW 4' METAL STUD WITH 5/8' GYP BD. AND BATT INSULATION DEMISING WALL ON EXIST. WALL CORRUGATED METAL EXTERIOR FINSH (5EE SPECIFICATION) I' RIGID INSULATION WATER PROOF MEMBRANE ON 5/8' WATER PROOF GYP 50. 6 METAL STUD @ 10" O.C. 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP BD. SERVICE DECK LEVEL WALL NON–RATED 4" STUD INT. WALL (W/O INSULATION) NON–RATED 5/8' TYPE 'X GYP BD. 6' METAL STUD @ 16' O.C. 5/8' TYPE "X" GYP BD. 6" STUD INT. WALL (W/O INSULATION) NON–RATED CORRUGATED METAL EXTERIOR FINSH (5EE SPECIFICATION) STRUCTURAL STEEL (SEE STRUCTRAL DWG) 7/8" HAT CHANEL (2) LAYERS 00 MIN. BUILDING PAPER 0/ 5/8' GLASS MAT GYPSUM SHEATHING R-13 BATT INSULATION 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP BD. 22 GA. STEEL LINER PANEL (5V) RETURN AIR TOWER (EXT. WALL) >1–HOUR F.R. – GA FILE NO. UL// U436 AND GA#WP8250 (PROVIDE 2 HOUR). SIM. TO GA# WP9020 22 GA. STEEL LINER PANEL (SV) RETURN AIR TOWER (INT. WALL) 1–HOUR F.R. – GA FILE NO. UL# U436 AND GA# WP9020 2–HOUR F.R. – GA FILE NO. UL// U436 AND GA/WP8250 (PROVIDE 2 HOUR), SIM. TO GA# WP9020 L j EXISTING GYP BD. WALL ASSEMBLY TO REMAIN (2) LAYERS 60 MIN. BUILDING PAPER 0/ NEW GYP. SHEATHING ON EXISTING WALL ASSEMBLY I" AIR GAP EXPOSED 8' FULLY GROUTED CMU WALL DEMISING WALL ON EXIST. WALL 2–HOUR F.R. – GA FILE NO. UL�/1� U436 AND GA#WP8250 (PROVIDE 2 HOUR), SIM. TO GA# WP9020 4 METAL STUD @ 10' O.C. N I" AIR GAP EXPOSED 8' CMU WAW Cip 4 METAL STUD WITH 5/8' GYP BD. AND 13/1 INSULATION 5 z EXPOSED C.M.U. DEMISING WALL ay 2–HOUR F.R. – GA FILE NO. UL// U436 AND �--� GA#WP8250 (PROVIDE 2 HOUR). SIM. TO GA# WP9020 T 11 1 8 P a 0 CHECK: DF 1110 NOTES: PERMIT SET 1' JOB NO 1009 DRAWN BY.. UKK+ CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO 1009 Jlf_ Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND, WA 98052 TEL 4252160319 FAS 425 2160329 WALL TYPE SHEET: AGOO OF: SHEETS DOOR HARDWARE GROUPS: HW -A: HW -E: PIVOT HINGES HEAVYWEIGHT HINGES CLOSERS EXT DEVICE CONCEALED ROD EXIT DEV10E5 CLOSER PULL BARS LEVER LOCK5ET THRESHOLD DOOR VIEWER HW -B: HW -F HEAVrNEIGHT HINGES PIVOT HINGES PASSAGE LEVER. LATCLISET DEADLOCK CLOSER PUSH BAR/PULL HANDLE WALL STOP THRESHOLD NOTE: SIGN 'DOOR TO REMAIN HW -C' UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HEAVYWEIGHT HINGES HOURS" PUSH BAR/PULL HANDLE HW -G: CLOSER UTTS HW -D: MORTISE LOCKSET (REMOVABLE CORE) HEAVYWEIGHT HINGES STOREROOM LEVER LOCKSET CLOSER WALL STOP DOOR HARDWARE GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL METAL DOOR AND FRAMES MUST CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STEEL DOOR INSTITT FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES. 2. ALL DOOR AND HARDNARE MUST BE INSTALLED A5 RECOMMENDED BY MAWFA.CTURER 3. ALL HARDWARE FOR HANDCAR -FED ACCE555Lf AREAS MUST COMPLY WTTH FEDERAL STATE, AND LOCAL ADA REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE LEVER TYRE HANDLES AT APPROPRIATE MOUNTING HEIGHTS. 4. ALL FIRE RATED DOORS MUST BE UL U5TE0 AND LABELLED ACCORDINGLY. 5. CONTRALTO? SHALL PROVIDE MASTER KEYING A5 REQUIRED BY OWNER. PROVIDE DUPLICATE KEYS A5 REQUIRED BY OWNER. 6. ALL DOOR CLOSERS TO REQUIRE 15 LE. OR LESS EFFORT TO OPEN DOOR. 1 - DOOR TYP55 Itlar FINISH SCHEDULE ROOM // ROOM NAME FLOOR BASE CEILING WALLS REMARKS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST MATERIAL FINISH MATERIAL FINISH MATERIAL FINISH MATERIAL FI51511 GROUND LEVEL 100 ENTRY LOBBY STAINED CONC. G' VINYL EXPOSED DECK - - GWB PT - - CMU SEALED 101 MEZZANINE LOBBY STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB FT - - CMU SEALED 102 HALLWAY STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT - - 103 MEETING ROOM STAINED CONC. 6° VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT - - GWB PT CMU SEALED 104 MEETING ROOM STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT - - 105 MEETING ROOM STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT 106 MEETING ROOM STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT 107 HALLWAY STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GMB FT GWB FT GWB PT - - I08 SERVER. ROOM CONC. - EXPOSED DECK. GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT 109 MEN'S RESTROOM STAINED CONC. CT GWB Ci/GWB PT CT/GWB PT CT/GWH PT Ci/GWB PT 60' CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT 110 WOMEN'S RESTROOM STAINED CONC. CT GWS CT/GWB PT CT/GWB FT CT/GWB PT CT/GWB PT 60' CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT III PREP. KITCHEN STAINED CONC. 6° VINYL GWB GWB PF GWD PT GWB PT GWB PT 112 HALLWAY STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWS PT GWB PT - - GWB FT 1 13 (N)ELECTRICAL ROOM CONC - EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT 114 SPRINKLER ROOM CONC. - EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB FT GWB PT 1 15 STAIR - EXIT CONC - EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB FT GWB PT GWB PT 116 RETAIL SPACE CONC - EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT 117 JANITOR'S CLOSET CONC. - EXPOSED DECK GWB FT FRP/GWB PT FRP/GWB FT FRP/GWB PT 48' FRP WAINSCOT SECOND LEVEL A200 SUIT UP STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK - - - - - - - - A201 ELEVATOR MACHINE RM. CONC. . - EXPOSED DECK GWB FT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT A202 CHANGE ROOM STAINED CONC. 6° VINYL GWB GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT FIBERGLASS SHOWER W/SURROUND A203 TEAM LOUNGE CONC. 6° VINYL GWB GWB PT GWB FT - - CMU SEALED A204 UTILITY ROOM CONC - EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB FT GWB PT GWB PT A205 STORAGE CONC. - EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT A2% CLASSROOM STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT GWB PT A207 DE -BRIEF AREA STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK - - GMB PT GWB PT - - A208 SALES AREA STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT - - - - A209 SNACK BAR STAINED CONC. 0° VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB FT - - - - - - A210 MEN'S RESTROOM STAINED CONC. CT GWB CT/GWB PT CT/GWB PT CT/GWB PT CT/GWB PT 60° CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT A2) I WOMEN'S RESTROOM STAINED CONC. CT GWB CT/GWB PT CT/GWB FT CT/GWB PT CT/GWB FT 60' CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT A212 HALLWAY STAINED CONC. 6' VINYL EXPOSED DECK GWB PT GWB PT GWB FT GWB PT DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR FRAME DETAIL MARK LOCATION FINISH FIN SH z GLASS HDWRREMARKS GROUP 512ERHIC5 MATERIAL TYPE EXT. INT. TYPE EXT. INT. - HEAD/JAMB (D ENTRY LOBBY- STORE FRONT FRINONGI41130 ANDD. ALUM A CIR CIR ALI1M 0P CLR - TEMPERED A / STOREFRONT SYSTEM - IJ MEETING ROOM 3'-0'+6'-0113:• SONSB SN 541 TIMELY rt PF - - 5 1? 1 MEETING ROOM 3'-0164113:' SLSD B 54V 540 TIMELY PF FF - - 5 11 MEETING ROOM 5'106-8.4132 SCWD 5 51V 540 TIMELY FF PF - - 5 51 MEETING ROOM 3'-016'-81135' SCWDB 040 540 TIMELY P1 FF - - B 1 e 1 MEN'S ROOM 0,7/4C -.541V 50505 540 540 TIMELY PI PF - - C 101 WOMEN'S ROOM 3'-0X00135' KIK/ 5 540 54V TIMELY PF PF - - C 1741 PREP. KITCHEN 3'-0.5555135' SONSB 540 54V TIMELY PT rt - - D 08i SERVER ROOM 3'-016-01135' SONSB PT rt TIMELY rt rt - - 0 (8) HALLWAY 3'-0X7!0135 SONS 5 PT PT TIMELY PT PF - - E (101 EXT STAIR 3'0+6-0113:' MRC FT Pt nM rt PT - - E 631 (E)ELECTRICAL ROOM 5555555135' 555iING DOOR TO WAN 1121 (N)ftiCTPJLAI ROOM 3'-016-01135 4500. NUMD QP LAi MUM CIR 0.0 - TEMPERED F L�31 SPRINKLER ROOM 004'-0113:• AN00. NUM 0 00 CLP. ALUM Cl? CIR TEMPERED F >.--------- I0) I !?,) EXT STAIR 5 -05.6-0113:' ANDD. NUM 0 09 CTP ALUM CLC CLR TEMPERED F (151 RETAIL - STORE FRONT AN00. NUM D CL. aP ALUM CLP. CLR TEMPERED G (-BI JANITORS C105ET 3. -0W -851W SLWDB 51 rt TIMELY rt PL - - D I0) RETAIL SPACE - REAR EXIT 3'0+0-011 V' ANDD. NUM 0 CAP CL? ALUM Of CLR TEMPERED G __:..---------- I 0.1 1191 EMERGENCY EXT DOOR TO STAIR 3'0645135• SONS 0 PT PT TIMELY FT 51 - - E / - 119) ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM 3'-016'4113:• SONS B PT PT TIMELY PT PT 60 - 5 1201 CHANGING ROOM 3'0+6'-05,3: SDK/ B 54V 54V TIMELY PT PT - - E FIA TEAM LOUNGE 3'064'.I35' 5050 0 54V 540 TIMELY FT PT - - 0/ 218 OFFICE 3'0+6-01135• SLWD 0 521 540 TIMELY rt R - - E / ' 127) STORAGE 3'OW-851 • 5050 B FT PT TIMELY PT PT - - 0 I8) UTILITY ROOM 3'016-041 �' SL1vDB PT rt TIMELY PT PT - - E / I0) CLASSROOM 3'0+6'41135 SCWDB 520 545 TIMELY PT PT - - B 125) MENS RESTROOM 0-016'4'.13;• SCWD 5 540 541 TIMELY PT PT - - B / ( ) WOMBS RESTROOM 3'06-0•.135' SONS 5 540 54V TIMELY Pt PT - - C / PERMIT DRAWING ISSUE 06/04/2010 g O O_ 45 a CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET 1 JOB NO: 1009 rM", Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING -„,,„,- 0.,... REDMOND. WA 98052 1111 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216 0329 -, DRAWN BY: UKK CHECK: DF NOTES: PERMIT SET PLOT DATE: 06/04/10 JOB NO: 1009 Jf Jensen Fey ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7730 LEARY WAY NE REDMOND. WA 98052 1111 425.216.0318 FAX: 425.216 0329 SCHEDULES SHEET: AGO5 OF: SHEETS '1 General Structural Notes CRITERIA 1. ALL MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (2006 EDITION). 2. DESIGN LOADING CRITERIA ROOF LNE LOAD 25 PSF ROOF LIVE LOAD (TENANT ACCESSIBLE) 60 PSF ROOF LNE LOAD (PUBLIC ACCESSIBLE) 100 PSF FLOOR LIVE LOAD (ASSEMBLY AREAS) 100 PSF FLOOR LIVE LOAD (STORES - RETAIL FIRST FLOOR) 100 PSF F1000 LIVE LOAD (STORES - RETAIL UPPER FLOORS) 75 PSF CATWALKS FOR MAINTENANCE ACCESS LNE LOAD 40 PSF FLOOR CONCENTRATED LOAD (STORES) 1000 LBS STAIR AND CORRIDOR LIVE LOAD 100 PSF PARTITION LOADING 20 PSF GUARDRAILS/BALCONY RAIL5 50 PLF GUARDRAILS/BALCONY RAILS CONCENTRATED LOAD 200 LBS MECHANICAL UNITS WEIGHTS FURNISHED BY MANUFACTURER SNOW Pf=25 PSF WIND Iw=1.0, GCpi=0.18, 85 MPH, EXPOSURE EARTHQUAKE ... ANALYSIS PROCEDURE: EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE LATERAL SYSTEM: SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES. 0=6.0 (NORTH -SOUTH) SPECIAL MOMENT FRAMES. R=8.0 (EAST -WEST) Vs = 147 KIPS, SITE CLASS = E Ss=1.43, 51=0.49, Sds=0.86, SD1=0.78, Cs=0.163 SDC D, Ie=1.0 SEE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL LOADING CRITERIA 3. STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR COMPATIBILITY AND SHALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS, MEMBER SIZES, AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. ALL DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED AS GUIDELINES ONLY AND MUST BE VERIFIED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING FOR THE STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS UNTIL ALL FINAL CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND THE METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE CONTRACTORS WORK. THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER HAS NO OVERALL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OR ACTUAL AND/OR DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SPECIFIC WORKING CONDITIONS AT THE SITE AND/OR FOR ANY HAZARDS RESULTING FROM THE ACTIONS OF ANY TRADE CONTRACTOR THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER HAS NO DUTY TO INSPECT, SUPERVISE, NOTE, CORRECT, OR REPORT ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY DEFICIENCIES TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTORS, OR OTHER ENTITIES OR PERSONS AT THE PROJECT SITE. 7. CONTRACTOR -INITIATED CHANGES SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE ARCHITECT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION. CHANGES SHOWN ON SHOP DRAWINGS ONLY WILL NOT SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. 8. DRAWINGS INDICATE GENERAL AND TYPICAL DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION. WHERE CONDITIONS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED BUT ARE OF SIMILAR CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN, SIMILAR DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE USED, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT AND THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 9. ALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS WHICH ARE TO BE COMPOSED OF COMPONENTS TO BE FIELD ERECTED SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY THE SUPPLIER DURING MANUFACTURING, DELIVERY, HANDLING, STORAGE AND ERECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER 10. SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF THESE ITEMS. METAL DECKING REINFORCING STEEL (FOR BOTH CONCRETE AND MASONRY CONSTRUCTION) STRUCTURAL STEEL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT WALL ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF AT LEAST 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE INDICATING LOCATIONS OF CONNECTION EMBEDMENTS AND WALL OPENINGS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH REINFORCEMENT SHOP DRAWINGS. APPROVED SETS OF ALL SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL ALSO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 11. SHOP DRAWING REVIEW: DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES ARE NOT REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, THEREFORE MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND STAMP DRAWINGS PRIOR TO REVIEW BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW DRAWINGS FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND OPERATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION, AND ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS INCIDENTAL THERETO. SUBMITTALS SHALL INCLUDE A REPRODUCIBLE AND ONE COPY; REPRODUCIBLE WILL BE MARKED AND RETURNED WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF RECEIPT WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE SUBMITTAL HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE SUBMITTED ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THEY HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS PROCESSED BY THE ENGINEER ARE NOT CHANGE ORDERS. THE PURPOSE OF SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS BY THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE ENGINEER THAT THE CONTRACTOR UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN CONCEPT, BY INDICATING WHICH MATERIAL IS INTENDED TO BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED AND BY DETAILING THE INTENDED FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION METHODS. IF DEVIATIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS BETWEEN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE DISCOVERED EITHER PRIOR TO OR AFTER SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS ARE PROCESSED BY THE ENGINEER, THE DESIGN DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTROL AND SHALL BE FOLLOWED. THE FOLLOWING APPLY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS 12. SHOP DRAWINGS OF DESIGN BUILD COMPONENTS INCLUDING CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMS, SKYLIGHT FRAMES, PREFABRICATED STAIR SYSTEMS, AND EXTERIOR CLADDING SHALL INCLUDE THE DESIGNING PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S STAMP, STATE OF WASHINGTON AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE COMPONENT DESIGNER PRIOR TO REVIEW OF THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE COMPONENT DESIGNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE CONFORMANCE AND ALL NECESSARYCONNKTIONSNOT SPKIFICALLYCALLED OUT ONARCHITECTURAL OR STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL INDICATE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF ALL LOADS IMPOSED ON BASIC STRUCTURE. DESIGN CALCULATIONS SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 13. EXTERIOR CLADDING PANELS AND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED 8Y THE MANUFACTURER FOR THE LOADS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT DETAIL DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS BEARING THE STAMP AND SIGNATURE OF A REGISTERED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, STATE OF WASHINGTON. MANUFACTURER'S ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DESIGN, CODE CONFORMANCE, AND CONNECTION OF EXTERIOR CLADDING PANELS TO BASIC STRUCTURE. ENGINEER OF RECORD TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRODUCT DESIGN, MANUFACTURE, DELIVERY AND HANDLING, OR CONNECTION TO BASIC STRUCTURE SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BEAR THE REVIEW STAMP OF THE DESIGNING ENGINEER'S FIRM PRIOR TO REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. ALL NECESSARY BRACING, TIES, ANCHORAGE, DISTRIBUTION MEMBERS, AND SIMILAR ELEMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH SUBMIT I EU DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS. QUALITY ASSURANCE 14. SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND SECTIONS 109 AND 1704 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE BY A QUALIFIED TESTING AGENCY DESIGNATED BY THE ARCHITECT, AND RETAINED BY THE BUILDING OWNER. THE ARCHITECT, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH COPIES OF ALL INSPECTION AND TEST RESULTS. SPECIAL INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION AND ERECTION PER TABLE 1704.3 CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION PER TABLE 1704.4 MASONRY CONSTRUCTION PER TABLE 1704.5.1 SOIL CONDITIONS, FILL PLACEMENT, AND DENSITY PER SOILS REPORT METAL DECK INSTALLATION (INCLUDING FIELD WELDING) PERIODIC EXPANSION BOLTS AND THREADED EXPANSION INSERTS PER MANUFACTURER EPDXY GROUTED INSTALLATIONS PER MANUFACTURER 15. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED M ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 1709 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE FOR THE FOLLOWING BUILDING ELEMENTS: CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION MASONRY CONSTRUCTION STRUCTURAL STEEL CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER OF RKORD ADEQUATE NOTICE TO SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE SITE VISITS FOR STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION MEANS THE VISUAL OBSERVATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM, FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AT SIGNIFICANT CONSTRUCTION STAGES AND AT COMPLETION OF THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION DOES NOT INCLUDE OR WAIVE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY SECTION 109 OR OTHER SECRONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. THE OWNER SHALL EMPLOY THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUC- TURAL DESIGN, TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION. OBSERVED DEFICIENCIES SHALL BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, SPECIAL INSPEC- TOR, CONTRACTOR, AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER SHALL 91BM1T TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL A WRITTEN STATEMENT THAT THE SITE VISITS HAVE BEEN MADE AND IDENTIFYING ANY REPORTED DEFICIENCIES WHICH, TO THE BEST OF THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER'S KNOWLEDGE, HAVE NOT BEEN RESOLVED. GEOTECHNICAL 16. FOUNDATION NOTES: SUBGRADE PREPARATION INCLUDING DRAINAGE, EXCAVATION, COMPACTION, AND FILLING REQUIREMENTS, SHALL CONFORM STRICT11 WITH RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN IN THE SOILS REPORT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON SOLID UNDISTURBED EARTH AT LEAST 18" BELOW LOWEST ADJACENT FINISHED GRADE. FOOTING DEPTHS/ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS (OR IN DETAILS) ARE MINIMUM AND FOR GUIDANCE ONLY; THE ACTUAL ELEVATIONS OF FOOTINGS MUST BE ESTABLISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR W THE FIELD WORKING WITH THE TESTING LAB AND SOILS ENGINEER. BACKFILL BEHIND ALL RETAINING WALLS W111 FREE DRAINING GRANULAR FILL AND PROVIDE FOR SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE A5 NOTED IN THE SOILS REPORT. ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE 2000 PSF LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE(RESTRAINED/UNRESTRAINED) 55 PCF/45 PCF SOILS REPORT REFERENCE: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERINS STUDY BY PANGEO DATED DEC 23, 2009 NO 09-145. 17. PIN PILES SHALL BE ORD/EN TO REFUSAL REFUSAL SHALL BE DEFINED AS LESS THAN 1 -INCH PENETRATION IN 60 SECONDS DURING CONTINUOUS DRIVING OF A 90 LB JACK HAMMER UNDER THE FULL EFFORT OF THE OPERATOR. THE MAXIMUM PILE ECCENTRICITY SHALL BE 4INCHES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF All ADJACENT UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO DRIVING PILES. RENOVATION 18. DEMOLITION: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS BEFORE COMMENCING ANY DEMOLITION. SHORING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO SUPPORT EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED AND IN A MANNER SUITABLE TO THE WORK SEQUENCES, DEMOLITION DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DAMAGE OR OVERLOAD THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. LIMIT CONSTRUCTION LOADING (INCLUDING DEMOLITION DEBRIS) ON EXISTING FLOOR SYSTEMS TO 40 PSF. 19. EXISTING REINFORCING SHALL BE SAVED WHERE AND AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SAW CUTTING, IF AND WHERE USED, SHALL NOT CUT EXISTING REINFORCBIG THAT IS TO BE SAVED. A. ALL NEW OPENINGS THROUGH EXISTING WALLS, SLABS AND BEAMS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY SAW CUTTING WHEREVER POSSIBLE. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LOCATION OF MEMBERS PRIOR TO GATING ANY OPENINGS. C. SMALL ROUND OPENINGS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY CORE DRILLING, IF POSSIBLE D. WHERE NEW REINFORCING TERMINATES AT EXISTING CONCRETE, DOWELS EPDXY GROUTED INTO EXISTING CONCRETE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO MATCH HORIZONTAL REINFORCING, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK FOR DRYROT AT ALL AREAS OF NEW WORK. ALL ROT SHALL BE REMOVED AND DAMAGED MEMBERS SHALL BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT. CONCRETE 21. CONCRETE SHALL BE MIXED, PROPORTIONED, CONVEYED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC SECTION 1905, 1906, AND AQ 301. STRENGTHS AT 28 DAYS AND MIX CRITERIA SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 28 DAY STRENGTH (Pc) A. SLABS ON GRADE 3,000 PSI TOPPING SLABS SLABS ON METAL DECK STAIR LANDINGS AND TREADS 8. ALL STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 4,000 PSI 22. THE MINIMUM AMOUNTS OF CEMENT MAY BE CHANGED IFA CONCRETE PERFORMANCE MD( IS SUBMITTED TO THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO PLACING ANY CONCRETE. THE PERFORMANCE MIX SHALL INCLUDE THE AMOUNTS OF CEMENT, FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE, WATER AND ADMIXTURES AS WELL AS THE WATER CEMENT RATIO, SLUMP, CONCRETE YIELD AND SUBSTANTIATING STRENGTH DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 1905.6. THE USE OF A PERFORMANCE MIX REQUIRES BATCH PLANT INSPECTION, THE COST OF WHICH SHALL BE PAID BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. REVIEW OF MIX SUBMITTALS BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD INDICATES ONLY THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED CONFORMS GENERALLY WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER MAINTAINS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SPECIFIED PERFORMANCE 23. ALL CONCRETE WITH SURFACES EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR STANDING WATER SHALL BE AIR -ENTRAINED WITH AN AIR -ENTRAINING AGENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C260, C494, AND 0618. TOTAL AIR CONTENT FOR FROST -RESISTANT CONCRETE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE ACI 318 TABLE 4.2.1 MODERATE EXPOSURE. 24. CONCRETE MAY BE PLACED BY THE "SHOTCRETE" METHOD, PROVIDED THE APPROVALS, TESTS, AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ARE OBTAINED. SHOTCRETE MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, PROCEDURES, PROPORTIONS, BATCHING, MIXING AND PLACEMENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 5060-05, ACI 506.2-95 AND INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE SECTION 1913. THE "SHOTCRETE° METHOD SHALL NOT BE USED WITHOUT MAKING SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS THROUGH OWNER AND ENGINEER UNLESS STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE SPECIFICALLY DETAILED TO ACCOMMODATE SHOTCRETING. 25. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615 (INCLUDING SUPPLEMENT SI), GRADE 60, fy = 60,000 PSL EXCEPTIONS: ANY BARS SPECIFICALLY SO NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE GRADE 40, fy = 40,000 PSL WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-185. SPIRAL REINFORCEMENT WALL BE PLAIN WIRE CONFORMING TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, fy = 60,000 PSI. 26. WELDING OF GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A706. REINFORCING COMPLYING WITH ASTM A615(51) MAY BE WELDED ONLY IF MATERIAL PROPERTY REPORTS INDICATING CONFORMANCE WITH WELDING PROCEDURES SPECIFIED IN A.W.S. D1.4 ARE SUBMITTED. WELDING OF GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE PERFORMED USING LOW HYDROGEN ELECTRODES. WELDING OF GRADE 40 REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70X0( ELECTRODES WELDING WITHIN 4" OF COLD BENDS IN REINFORCING STEEL IS NOT PERMITTED. 27. DETAILING OF REINFORCING STEEL (INCLUDING HOOKS AND BENDS) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 315.99 AND 318-05. LAP ALL CONTINUOUS REINFORCEMENT #5 AND SMALLER 40 BAR DIAMETERS OR2-0" MINIMUM. PROVIDE CORNER BARS AT ALL WALL AND FOOTING INTERSECTIONS. LAP CORNER BARS #5 AND SMALLER 40 BAR DIAMETERS OR 2-0" MINIMUM. LAPS OF LARGER BARS SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318-05, CLASS B. LAP ADJACENT MATS OF WELDED WIRE FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 8" AT SIDES AND ENDS. NO BARS PARTIALLY EMBEDDED IN HARDENED CONCRETE SHALL BE FIELD BENT UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SO DETAILED OR APPROVED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 28. CONCRETE PROTECTION (COVER) FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: FOOTINGS AND OTHER UNFORMED SURFACES CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH 3" FORMED SURFACES EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER (06 BARS OR LARGER) 2" FORMED SURFACES EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER (05 BARS OR SMALLER).. 1-1/2" COLUMN TIES OR SPIRALS AND BEAM STIRRUPS 1-1/2" SLABS AND WALLS (INT. FACE)... .GREATER OF BAR DIAMETER PLUS 1/8" OR 3/4° 29. CONCRETE WALL REINFORCING --PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE: 6' WALLS 8' WALLS 10" WALLS 12" WALLS #4 @ 16 HORIZ. #4 @ 12 HORIZ. #4 @ 18 HORIZ #4 @ 16 HORIZ #4 @ 18 VERTICAL 1 CURTAIN #4 @ 18 VERTICAL 1 CURTAIN #4 @ 18 VERTICAL 2 CURTAINS #4 9118 VERTICAL 2 CURTAINS 30. CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS IN ALL CONCRETE WALLS. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR SIZE AND LOCATION OF MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL OPENINGS THROUGH CONCRETE WALLS. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL GROOVES, NOTCHES, CHAMFERS, FEATURE STRIPS, COLOR, TEXTURE, AND OTHER FINISH DETAILS AT ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE SURFACES, BOTH CAST -IN-PLACE AND PRECAST. 31. NON -SHRINK GROUT SHALL BE FURNISHED BY AN APPROVED MANUFACTURER AND SHALL BE MIXED AND PLACED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS. GROUT STRENGTH SHALL BE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE MATERIAL ON WHICH ITIS PLACED (3000 PSI MINIMUM). 32. MECHANICAL SPLICING OF REINFORCING BARS, WHERE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, SHALL 8E BY AN ICC -ES APPROVED SYSTEM (SUCH AS LEMON, FOX-HOWLETT, ETC.) AND SHALL DEVELOP 125% OF THE SPECIFIED YIELD STRENGTH OF THE BARS. SPLICE LOCATIONS OF ALTERNATE BARS SHALL BE OFFSET BY A DISTANCE WHICH CONFORMS TO THE ICC -ES REPORT OF THE SPLICE USED. REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LIMITATIONS ON PLACEMENT OF MECHANICAL SPLICES. ANCHORAGE 33. DIPANSION BOLTS INTO CONCRETE AND CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS SHALL BE "KWIK BOLT 3" AS MANUFACTURED BY THE HILTI CORP., INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ICC -ES REPORT N0. ESR -1385, INCLUDING MINIMUM EMBEDMENT REQUIREMENTS. BOLTS INTO CONCRETE MASONRY OR BRICK MASONRY UNITS SHALL BE INTO FULLY GRIXUTE0 CELLS. SUBSTITUTES PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW WITH ICC REPORTS INDICATING EQUIVALENT OR GREATER LOAD CAPACITIES. SPECIAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL EXPANSION BOLT INSTALLATION. 34. EPDXY-GROUTED ITEMS (THREADED RODS OR REINFORCING BAR) SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED USING "HIT RE 500" AS MANUFACTURED BY HILTI CORP. INSTALL IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ICC -ES REPORT N0. ESR -2322. SPECIAL INSPECTION OF INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED. RODS SHALL BE A511.1 A-36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 35. DRIVE PINS AND OTHER POWDER -ACTUATED FASTENERS SHALL BE LOW VELOCITY TYPE (SERIES X -DNI, 0.145" DIAMETER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) AS MANUFACTURED BY THE HILTI CORP. OR AN APPROVED EQUIVALENT IN STRENGTH AND EMBEDMENT. INSTALL IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ICC -ES REPORT N0. ER -1633. MINIMUM EMBEDMENT IN CONCRETE SHALL BE 1" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MAINTAIN AT LEAST 3" TO NEAREST CONCRETE EDGE. GENERAL NOTES CONTINUE ON S1.2 0 Liiw LU�y ID EIISGN SAY FADE! • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Tri SWENSON SAY FAGOT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Nand Avenue .0=4010.504010. WA 98121 O :206443.6212 14r: 206443.4810 • 40.04M41,49+.104, DRAWN: DIN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED, ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT TITLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 2s▪ 5DE, PERMIT SHEET TIRE: GENERAL NOTES SCALE: 12" = 1'-0" PERMIT GATE: 04-28-2010 PROJECT No: 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO: S1.1 H N0: OF SHEETS: 4 General Structural Notes THE FOLLOWING APPLY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS STEEL 36. STRUCTURAL 51 bAL DESIGN, FABRICATION, AND ERECTION SHALL BE BASED ON: 1. EITHER AI5C 360 AND SECTION 2205.2 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. 2. MARCH 18, 2005 AISC CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL BUILDINGS AND BRIDGES, AMENDED AS FOLLOWS. A. A5 NOTED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 8. BY THE DELETION OF PARAGRAPH 4.4.1. C. REVISE REFERENCE FROM "STRUCTURAL DESIGN DRAWINGS" TO "CONTRACT DOCUMENTS" IN PARAGRAPH 3.1, 3. SPECIFICATION FOR STRUCTURAL JOINTS USING ASTM A325 OR A490 BOLTS. 37. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: TYPE OF MEMBER ASTM SPECIFICATION Fy A WIDE RANGE SHAPES A992 50 KS B. OTHER SHAPES, PLATES, AND RODS A36 36 KSI C. OTHER SHAPE AND PLATES A572 (GRADE 50) 50 KSI (NOTED GRADE 50 ON PLANS) D. PIPE COLUMNS A53 (E ORS, ORB) 35 KSI E STRUCTURAL TUBING A500 (GRADE B) (SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR) 46161 (ROUND) 42 KSI F. CONNECTION BOLTS A325-5 (3/4" ROUND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE) 38. ARCHITECTURALLY EXPOSED STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 10 OF THE ALSO CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL BUILDINGS AND BRIDGES. 39. ALL A -325N CONNECTION BOLTS NEED ONLY BE TIGHTENED TO A SNUG TIGHT CONDITION, DEFINED AS THE TIGHTNESS THAT EXISTS WHEN ALL PLIES IN A JOINT ARE IN FIRM CONTACT. THIS MAY BE ATTAINED BY A FEW IMPACTS OF AN IMPACT WRENCH OR THE FULL EFFORT OF AN IRONWORKER USING AN ORDINARY SPUD WRENCH. 40. ALL ANCHORS EMBEDDED IN MASONRY OR CONCRETE SHALL BE A307 HEADED BOLTS 0R A36 THREADED ROD WITH AN ASTM 563 HEAVY HD( NUT TACK WELDED ON THE EMBEDDED END. 41. ALL WELDING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH A.I.S.0 AND A.W.S. STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PERFORMED BY WAB.O. CERTIFIED WELDERS USING E70 XX ELECTRODES. ONLY PREQUALIFIED WELDS (A5 DEFINED BY A.W.S.) SHALL BE USED. ALL COMPLETE JOINT PENETRATION GROOVE WELDS SHALL BE MADE WITH A FILLER MATERIAL THAT HAS A MINIMUM CVN TOUGHNESS OF 20 FT -LBS AT -20 DEGREES F AND 40 FT -LBS AT 70 DEGREES F, A5 DETERMINED BY AWS CLASSIFICATION OR MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION. 42. METAL FLOOR AND ROOF DECKING --PROVIDE SIZE, TYPE, GAUGE, AND ATTACHMENT TO THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALTERNATES MUST BE CONNECTED ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED ICC -ES CRITERIA FOR DIAPHRAGM SHEARS SHOWN. PROVIDE SHORING WHERE REQUIRED PER MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED CRITERIA. ALL DECKING SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STEEL DECK INSTITUTE 43. COLD -FORMED STEEL FRAMING NOTE --THE FOLLOWING APPLY UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS: A THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM OVER ALL BABRICATION AND ERECTION ACTIVITY THROUGH THE USE OF AN INDEPENDENT TESTING AGENCY AND/OR A QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STEEL MANUFACTURER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN MILL CERTIFICATION FROM THE GAUGE STEEL MANUFACTURER OR SHALL SUBMIT TENSILE TESTS AND GALVANIZATION 11515 TO THE ENGINER OF RECORD TO VERIFY THE ADEQUACY OF THE GAUGE MATERIALS. SCOLD -FORMED STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE OF THE SHAPE, SIZE, AND GAUGE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. NOTATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS, RELATING TO MEMBER TYPES AND SIZES OR MISCELLANEOUS FRAMING ITEMS, REFER TO SIZE AS PUBLISHED BY THE STEEL SND MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, 1060 ER -4943P. PRODUCTS BY OTHER MANUFACTURERS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR FRAMING SHOWN, PROVIDED THEY ARE EQUIVALENT IN SHAPE, SIZE, STIFFNESS, AND STRENGTH. ALTERNATE FRAMING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO FABRICATION. ALL COLD FORMED STEEL FRAMING SHALL CONFORM TO THE AISI, "STANDARD FOR COLD FORMED STEEL FRAMING." DESIGNATION: 600 5 200 - 54 DEPTH MEMBER FLANGE MATERIAL STYLE WIDTH THICKNESS(MILS) C MATERIAL: METAL FRAMING SHALL BE GALVANIZED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CONFORMING AS FOLLOWS: ASTM A653, GRADE 50 Fy = 50 ksi 12, 14, AND 16 GAUGE ASTM A653, GRADE 33 Fy = 33 ksi 18 AND 20 GAUGE WHERE NOTED, PAINTED STUDS SHALL CONFORM TO: ASTM A570, GRADE E Fy = 50 ksi ALL 8 AND 10 GAGE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO: ASTM A36 Fy = 36 ksi D. ACCESSORIES SHALL BE OF THE TYPE, SIZE, AND SPACING SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OF A MINIMUM 16 GAUGE MATERIAL UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE MESCELLANEOUS FRAMING CUPS, LEDGERS, AND ACCESSORIES OF MINIMUM 16 GAUGE WHERE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTIONS AND BEARING CONDITIONS NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. FASTENING OF COMPONENTS SHALL BE BY WELDING OR SCREWING OR BY OTHER MEANS OF FASTENING AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. WELDS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO INSURE THE STRENGTH OF THE CONNECTION: WIRE TYING OF COMPONENTS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. ALL WELDS SHALL BE TOUCHED UP WITH A ZINC -RICH PAINT. E SCREWS: ALL SCREWS (REFERRED TO AS TEK) SHALL BE SELF -TAPPING SELF - DRILLING FASTENERS THAT ARE ZINC COATED AS MANUFACTURED BY HMI KWIK-FLEX (ICB0 04780), OR APPROVED EQUAL THE MINIMUM SCREW SIZE/TYPE/POINT SHALL BE #8-18 (#2 POINT) OR 010-16(02 POINT) FOR USE IN 20 GAUGE THROUGH 16 GAUGE, AND 010-16 (#3 POINT) OR #12.14 (02 OR #3 POINT) FOR HEAVIER THAN 16 GAUGE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SCREWS FOR SHEATHING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE OF THE PROPER SIZE AND TYPE FOR A POSITIVE SHEATHING -TO -METAL CONNECTION. ALL SCREW CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE FROM THE LIGHTER MATERIAL INTO THE HEAVIER MATERIAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SCREWS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM PROJECTION OF 3 THREADS THROUGH THE LAST MATERIAL JOINED AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCES AND CENTER TO CENTER SPACINGS OF 1-1/2 AND 3 SCREW DIAMETERS, RESPECTIVELY. ALL SCREWS SHALL CONFORM TO SAE 378 AND SHALL 8E COATED WITH A CORROSIVE -RESISTANT COATING. THE SCREW MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE FASTENERS RESISTANCE TO HYDROGEN EMBRITTELMENT, UPON REQUEST. PRODUCE THE SPECIFIED CLASSES OF WELD. F. WELDING OF COLD -FORMED METAL FRAMING SHALL CONFORM TO AWS D1.3 AND SHALL BE PERFORMED BY W.A.B.O. CERTIFIED WELDERS QUALIFIED TO G. WALL FRAMING: REFER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL STUD WALLS NOT SHOWN. TWO STUDS MINIMUM SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE END OF ALL WALLS AND AT EACH SIDE OF ALL OPENINGS. TWO 8005162-54 HEADERS SHALL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL OPENINGS NOT OTHERWISE NOTED. SOLID BLOCKING FOR MULTI -SND OR STEEL COLUMNS SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH FLOORS TO SUPPORTS BELOW. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS FULL WIDTH BLOCKING AT MID -HEIGHT OF ALL SND WALLS OVER 10' IN HEIGHT. TYPICAL EXTERIOR STUDS SHALL BE 6005200-3 @ 16" OC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL SND WALLS SHALL HAVE THEIR BOTTOM TRACKS ATTACHED TO FRAMING BELOW WITH #8 SCREWS AT 24" 0.C. OR ATTACHED TO CONCRETE WITH 0.145" DIAMETER DRIVE -PINS @ 24" 0.C. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF BUILT-UP POSTS SHALL BE WELDED TO EACH OTHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS. REFER TO THE PLANS AND SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE FOR REQUIRED SHEATHING AND STRAP BRACING. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE NOTED, PROVIDE GYPSUM WALLBOARD ON INTERIOR SURFACE AND GYPSUM SHEATHING ON EXTERIOR SURFACE SCREWED TO ALL STUDS, TOP AND BOTTOM TRACKS, AND BLOCKING WITH SCREWS AT 12° 0.C. TRACK SECTIONS SHALL MATCH THE WALL STUD GAUGE, BE UNPUNCHED AND HAVE AT LEAST 1-1/4° FLANGE. BRIDGING AND BRACING IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL COLD FORMED STEEL BEARING WALLS. BRIDGING AND BRACING SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL PLANS, OR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO DESIGN AN ALTERNATE BRACING SYSTEM. IF AN ALTERNATE BRACING SYSTEM IS USED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT STAMPED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD WHICH DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BRACING SYSTEM WAS DEIGNED TO PROVIDE PERMANENT WEB( AXIS BRACING OF THE STUDS UNDER CODE PRESCRIBED LOADS. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 44. HEADED STUDS FOR COMPOSITE CONNECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL TO CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM MATERIAL CONFORMING TO ASTM A-108 AND SHALL BE WELDED IN CONFORMANCE WITH A.W.S. REQUIREMENTS. 45. DEFORMED BAR ANCHORS SHALL BE TYPE 021 ANCHORS BY NELSON SND WELDING DIVISION, TRW ASSEMBLIES AND FASTENERS GROUP OR EQUIVALENT. ANCHORS SHALL BE MADE FROM COLD ROLLED, DEFORMED STEEL CONFORMING TO ASTM A-496. MASONRY 48. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF GRADE N, TYPE I UNITS, CONFORMING TO ASTM C90, LAID IN A RUNNING BOND. MORTAR SHALL BE TYPE "S" PER TABLE 2103.8(1) OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. GROUT SHALL CONFORM TO TABLE 2103.12 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND ATTAIN A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, DESIGN Pm = 1500 PSL STRENGTH SHALL BE VERIFIED BY EITHER THE UNIT STRENGTH METHOD OR PRISM TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2105.2. WHEN VERIFIED BY THE UNIT STRENGTH METHOD, MASONRY UNITS SHALL BE CHOSEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 2105.2.2.1.1 OR 2105.2.2.1.2 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING REINFORCEMENT: 4' WALLS #4 @ 48" 0.C. VERT 3/16 dia. WIRE 30INT REINF. AT 8" 0.C. FIORE 6" WALLS #4 @ 48" 0.C. VERT. (2) 04 @ 48" 0.C. FIORE 8' WALLS 05 @ 48" 0.8. VERT. (2) 04 @ 48' 0.C. FIORE 10" WAIS 05 @ 40' 0.C. VERT. (2) #5 @ 48' 0.8. HORIL 12" WALLS 05 @ 32' 0.C. VERT. (2) #5 @ 40" 0.0 FIORE IN ADDITION, PROVIDE (1) 05 (#4 @ 6" AND 4' WALLS) VERT. AT EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS, AT WALL CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS AND AT FREE ENDS OF WALLS AND (2) #4 (04 @ 4" WALLS) FIORE. AT ELEVATED FLOOR AND ROOF LEVELS, AT TOPS OF WALLS AND ABOVE AND BELOW ALL OPENINGS. ALL HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN BOND BEAMS. MEND RENFORCEMENT AROUND OPENINGS 2'-0" BEYOND FACE OF OPENING. IF 2'-0" IS UNAVAILABLE EXTEND AS FAR AS POSSIBLE AND HOOK. PROVIDE CORNER BARS TO LAP HORIZONTAL REINFORCING AT CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS. LAP ALL REINFORCING STEEL 48 BAR DIAMETERS OR 24" MINIMUM. FILL ALL CELLS CONTAINING REINFORCEMENT OR EMBEDDED ITEMS AND ALL CELLS BELOW GRADE WITH GROUT. PROVIDE CLEANOUT HOLES AT BOTTOM OF ALL CELLS CONTAINING REINFORCEMENT FOR ALL GROUT POURS OVER 5 FEET IN HEIGHT. UNITS MAY BE LAID TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE GROUT POUR AND GROUT SHALL BE PLACED INA CONTINUOUS POUR IN GROUT LIFTS NOT EJ(CEEDING 5 FEET. ALL PREPARATION AND PLACING OF MASONRY SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 2104 OF THE INTERNATIONAL 80110158 CODE \0 m N Z ELI ID 0 8 4 0 8 A •IP rri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Thad Avenue - Suite 100 -Seattle, WA 98121 p0: 206.443 6212 34n: 206 443.4870 www.swava saNa9ecmn 4-28-2010 DRAWN: DIN DE0GN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE CT- C`P PROJECT TIME: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TIRE: GENERAL NOTES 12» = 1'-0" PERMIT DATE 04-28-2010 PROJECT rvo: 1340-2009-01 SHEET N0: NO: S1.2 OF SHEETS: 1 PLENUM 1/8-.1.-o. (A B) (C) (DYE) S4.2>( 2 z� )I1I sa- 19'-10" 2" 16'-31/2" 1 16'-31/2" II 1 I 1 \ S3.3 / 18'-37/8" (0.5) (1 I 11----7T\ 2 II - it II III I I _ II 2 5+.21 11 11 4) 5) PLAN NOTE`t 1. SLAB ON GRADE ELEVATION IS PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. SLAB ON GRADE SHALL BEI? THICK WITH REINFORCEMENT PER PLAN. PREPARE SOILS AND PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. FINAL FOOTING ELEVATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ON SITE VERIFICATION BY SOILS ENGINEER 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL/CIVIL FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING. FOOTINGS MAY BE LOWERED TO AVOID CONFLICTS, SEE 5/53.2. 4. SEE 3/53.2 FOR TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT AT CONCRETE WALL OPENINGS. 5. SEE 1/53.2 FOR TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT AT WALL AND FOOTING CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS. 6. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. 7. PROVIDE BACKFILL AT BELOW GRADE CONCRETE WALLS PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. DO NOT BACKFILL UNTIL FLOOR SLABS AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL HAVE BEEN POURED. CI 0 LU N ti Z LU Q 2 02 J V w 0 AGE • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2121 Third Avenue . Suite 100 -Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 206 111.6212 141: 206 411.1810 www.sumsonsaylapecmn 77,:prVs DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE M ci3 PROJECT TITLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE PLENUM FRAMING PLAN 1/8 = 1'-0 PERMIT DATE 04-28-2010 PROJECT NO. 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO: S2.1 $ NO: OF SHEETS: I 1— ------1 d � 5 „..---1' 'H 1' � -0" CONC WALL W/#5@12"EW,EF TYP 1 R" THIO(SIAB -v. 1 w/#5@12'EW TOP & BOT I I I 6 ri (0.5) (1 I 11----7T\ 2 II - it II III I I _ II 2 5+.21 11 11 4) 5) PLAN NOTE`t 1. SLAB ON GRADE ELEVATION IS PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. SLAB ON GRADE SHALL BEI? THICK WITH REINFORCEMENT PER PLAN. PREPARE SOILS AND PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. FINAL FOOTING ELEVATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ON SITE VERIFICATION BY SOILS ENGINEER 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL/CIVIL FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING. FOOTINGS MAY BE LOWERED TO AVOID CONFLICTS, SEE 5/53.2. 4. SEE 3/53.2 FOR TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT AT CONCRETE WALL OPENINGS. 5. SEE 1/53.2 FOR TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT AT WALL AND FOOTING CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS. 6. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. 7. PROVIDE BACKFILL AT BELOW GRADE CONCRETE WALLS PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. DO NOT BACKFILL UNTIL FLOOR SLABS AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL HAVE BEEN POURED. CI 0 LU N ti Z LU Q 2 02 J V w 0 AGE • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2121 Third Avenue . Suite 100 -Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 206 111.6212 141: 206 411.1810 www.sumsonsaylapecmn 77,:prVs DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE M ci3 PROJECT TITLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE PLENUM FRAMING PLAN 1/8 = 1'-0 PERMIT DATE 04-28-2010 PROJECT NO. 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO: S2.1 $ NO: OF SHEETS: f (Aa B) 19'-10" 16' - 31/2" (E) BLDG (N) BLDG • JAN 8" CMU WALL--- 5OLID GROUTED W/ #5@8'OCVERT (2) 04 @ 48' OC HOR12 -LI 2 S4.1) 3-21/8' (C) (D . 1��'16'-31/2" 2 ,I E; FSG 18' - 3 7/8' .4 r �d -- SLOPING COLUMN' j -a I( IOL I,I -r rIj_ t ss.8 - - - - 5'-2' � (N)BLDG 54.2 Y ' #21 -,_I SLOPING COLUMN -- nr- -% 4 - - )4 I7 -0. I 8' -0j -I °� ' e r 311"XT-ONI2'DPFT 4 1 \.,SJ I (4) #5 EW BOT TYP (4) IOCS V r ? - " 12"Wx4'-0" DP UPTURNED CONC BM yl I IJ -1- =1-/ -F-i moo--- ----o-----�HLI_'_-r-_ #4@12"80T-.I� a#6@12"BOT -- I7\ / I ' S3.3 / I."� ' 3 `S33 I L I \ s�.3 rr RI 12'Wx4'-0" DPI UPTURNED CONC BM r10" CONC SLAB TT" -}-- I141 'N. - - I- ,I li-/ a , / III s5.6/ p 4" SOG L -,c - 4 rT 1 \ 53.3 (s3.t/ - #4x -- @ 12" TOP TYP All EDGES OF 10" SLAB it (E) BLDG `.1) 8" CMU WALL�I� SOLID GROUTED W/1 #5@8'OC VERT I (2) 04 @ 48' OC HORI2 , ' 1 12"Wx4'-0" DP UPTURNED CONC BM ' '‘- f 4 I 1\ S3.1 It 1::' - -_�L-__._ -_.... ?; S3.1 / / 1 11 "1.-- 1 L I 7I___ -_ °o II 112 Wx4'-0" DP UPTURNED CONC BM . „,-------11 ct?_n 71/4I/io �i ahI 1 l I#4@1rB0T- 107 CONIC SLAB - #4x 12" TOP TYP ALL EDGES OF 10" SNB HSS6A6X5/16- 11 dy X53/3/ p L 6 I" �q S3.1 -I < O O �` i P3 STD SLOPING : i CANOPY-- 1-<-- _ - _ - _ _ ==fl/1'--COLUMNS--'1-7-i -q , - - - - - - - - - - - - / L 7 -6"x2' -0"x12" DP FTG 1�'- SLOPING COLUMN 8 '. V (5) #4 EW NOT, TYP . 1 S5.7 / 13 - 6 3/4" ;I Ti 2'-111/8 II 14 1 GROUND FLOOR 1/8" = 1-0' kr --i 1 ) I 3) , 6 \ c* / (E) SOG SLOPING COLUMN (4) H 5 ) � I E PLAN NOTES 1. SLAB ON GRADE ELEVATIONS VARY PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. SLAB ON GRADE SHALL BE 4' THICK AND REINFORCED WITH 6X6 W1.4X1.4 WWM AT CENTER IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER REINFORCEMENT SHOWN ON PLAN. PREPARE SOILS AND PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. PROVIDE CONTROL OR CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN SLABS ON GRADE TO DNIDE SLAB IN AREAS OF 400 SQUARE FEET 0R LESS. AREAS SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY SQUARE AND SHALL HAVE NO ACUTE ANGLES. JOINT LOCATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. REFER TO DETAIL3/53.1. 3. TOPS OF ALL FOOTING SHALL BE 8"MIN BELOW TOP OF SLAB ON GRADE, UON. FINAL FOOTING ELEVATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ON SITE VERIFICATION BY 50115 ENGINEER. 4. REFER TO MECHANICAL/CNIL FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING. FOOTINGS MAY BE LOWERED TO AVOID CONFLICTS, SEE 5/53.2. 5. SEE 3/53.2 FOR TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT AT CONCRETE WALL OPENINGS. 6. SEE 1/53.2 FOR TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT AT WALL AND FOOTING CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS. 7. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECIURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. 8. SEE 6/53.2 FOR ONE WAY SLAB REINFORCEMENT. 9. SEE 8/S3.2 FOR TYP OPENING IN CONCRETE BEAMS. 10. SEE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON 55.6 FOR COLUMN SIZES NOT NOTED ON PLANS OR ELEVATIONS. 11. EXTERIOR STUDS 51-1ALL BE MINIMUM 20 GAUGE WHERE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS. CORYRIGHi,2Oo1 SWENSON SAV RAGEI • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED rri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2121 T19N Avenue - Sorts 100 -Seattle, WA 98121 99:206A43.6212 l2x: 206 443.4810 vww.swensoMex(99... 4-28-2010 DRAWN: WN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED ABB REVISIONS # DESCRIPTION DATE PROTECT TI1LE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE. PERMIT SHEET TITLE: PLENUM DECK FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PERMIT DATE, 04-28-2010 PROJECT NO. 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO: S2.2 NO: OF SHEETS: (AA) 19 10' ?XB) (C) 3 1/2"CONC ON 3" 16' - 31/2"r18GA METAL DECK 16' - 3 1/2' (X ) 16' - 3 7/8" o W12X14 f I W12X14 W14X22 1 1 P /, pl , -i s531 y3 tS4.2 [19'-81/4"] ---1--- ------•--`o f----,-HSSIOXIOX5/16-----1.—o-...-- _•---�------- - W8X10 . S! m A W126 1.7 'I xlI la I_ � s�I IIol I MOMENTFRAMF2FRJ/59.1 1 ISI 61 x 1 I 1 1 I m 3 — a — W14X22 A.... I-- 1 W24X55 e 1 19' - 81/4" 1 —1 ---- I1-1 ' S5.3 1 -- R i 13 < 55.6 / I R. °i 3 — Its -81/4"1 -I�w14xu, i", — :04.11 WIi 26 `/ ' W24X61 _ _/ 3 \ ^._zi M I W16X26 I1 ti , �.:� 1 ------....`t,/ 119'-8114'] y_\_ —. I SY 12 /^1 m 111,X14 /` 11 05.3 '�-i1---____-✓,• S5.3 �-� 2 Wtax22 I' 4X I WI 0261 ss.3 J W8XI0 I I I ~ � a 19''-81/4.1 ^ a 3 WI8X76 3 1/2YONC ON 3° 1806 METAL'DECK _--.— I 1I �3 \-' /• 1 S5.2 / - _—_—_—.__/ 8...1 is ./ R. 3 — m 3 W14X22 — - - I- . 3 W24X55 WI 022 ' sa.z% 'NI H55606X3/16— LOW STOREFRONT HEADER S5.7 ' ` 1—L IPI W16X26 I MOMENT FRAME'PER 2/54 2 119' - 1191 I �+ 1 I 8114' ] +---h o� II 1 1= = I 1 ry 3 -— IQI I01i _- -- H556X6X3/16 - / HSS1OX10X5/16 0 „ i LOW STOREFRONT HEADER _,_i_..-9------ I o ---------- —I— -W12X14-[19'-8114"]--�—..-.__--_=- '1 II IM I l 1115540303/16 CURVED 8M i I LOCATION PER ARCH d I 1 2 S5.7 ) 1 OBSERVATION DECK 1/8" = 3) (4) --(D" ) 5) PLAN NOTES 1. TYPICAL FLOOR FRAMING CONSISTS OF 31/2" NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE TOPPING OVER 3" DEEP 18 GAUGE MINIMUM THICKNESS METAL DECK. SEE DETAIL 11/55.6. REINFORCE WITH 6X6 W1.4X1.4 WWM IN ADDITION TO REINFORCEMENT SHOWN PER PLAN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR TOP OF SLAB ELEVATIONS AND STEP LOCATIONS. 2. REFERENCE TOP OF STEEL IS 20'-31/4" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED BY [10('-)0X"]. 3. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SHORING OF METAL DECK WHERE REQUIRED PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL WALL INFORMATION. DITERIOR STUDS SHALL BE MINIMUM 20 GAUGE WHERE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS. 5. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. CORYRIGHVc2 rDI SWENSON SAY FAGEI • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED rri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 212/ Third Avenue • Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 206 443.6212 lar: 206 443,4810 w.w.s..erlsoasaNa9eccan DRAWN: DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT TITLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE PERMIT SHEET TTTLE', OBSERVATION DECK FRAMING PLAN Al F; PERMIT DATE:04-28-2010 PROJECT No: 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO S2.3 NO: OF SHEETS: (A�B 19'-10" 2" 16'-31/2" C (DXE) 16' - 31/2" –91 2" W8X10 3 W1 22 W 6 35'-3" • w 6 WI 22 W12X14 � 1 LOW ROOF DECK 1 /8" = 1'-0" PLAN NOTES 8551081085/16 (. F X. 18' - 3 7/8" 5" ------- ---- --40.5) II I of 1�� 1 1 l•------ /i_ -I . SS.t-� 0 1 ::Y " 541 I 10 = I ' I x 5 V—r— - 1/ 1 .‘,. 1,. w24055 I-- 1 X i 3 S5.6 H W24X62 3 -4 3 I', i I ,--L1• --- r'�• 4 3 180A 1/2"CONC ON 3"_ METAL DECK 3 . 3 ! I s i—1 W24055 MOMENTFRAMEIPER 2/54.2 °1.e Ix I MI of I HRRIAX10XS/Ifi 10 �I 1e 14\ \ S5.2 1. TYPICAL FLOOR FRAMING CONSISTS OF 3 V2" NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE TOPPING OVER 3" DEEP 18 GAUGE MINIMUM THICKNESS METAL DECK. SEE DETAIL 11/55.6. REINFORCE WITH 606 W1.401.4 WWM IN ADDITION TO REINFORCEMENT SHOWN PER PLAN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR TOP OF SLAB ELEVATIONS AND STEP LOCATIONS. 2. REFERENCE TOP OF STEEL IS 32'-41/4" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED BY [OC -XXX"]. 3. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SHORING OF METAL DECK WHERE REQUIRED PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL WALL INFORMATION. EXTERIOR STUDS SHALL BE MINIMUM 20 GAUGE WHERE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS. 5. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. 6. SEE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON 55.6 FOR COLUMN SIZES NOT NOTED ON PLANS OR ELEVATIONS. ;4I AA) 19' -10" (A (C • 2 ) ' r ▪ S4,/ 2'' 16'-31/2" 11 .a9- LO! I° IIs it 1 D V ' MOMENT FRAME,PER 1/54.1 i Q I �IIE /` 11 C 54.2 >1 16' - 31/2" ' 2" 18'-37/8" HS510$I0X5/16 2 MID LEVEL BOS 1/8" = 1* -0" PLAN NOTES - — - —W24055 I 10 1 Io 5" 11 II ,I I I 6 a I ^10 o W24X55- MOMENT FRAME 2/54.2 H5510010X5/16 T II N l I I II II II I I I it II I II II I I II I I I I I II I I I I I 1. REFERENCE BOTTOM OF STEEL I5 45'-9" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED BY [XX' -XXX"]. 2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL WALL INFORMATION. EXTERIOR STUDS SHALL BE MINIMUM 20 GAUGE WHERE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. II. - (0.51 1 ^�•— --H 2 \ s4.1 / --I 3 I —' 4 i 5) 6) CORVRIGHTd200? SWENSON SAY FAGEL- ALL RIGH IS RESERVED Tri SWENSON SAY FACET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third Avenue - Suite 100 - Seattle. WA 98121 ph: 206 443 6212 lax: 206.4434810 www.swenmrw4Vf43 ccom 4-28-2010 DRAWN: D)N DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED. ABB 069131ONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT TITLE'_ IFLY - Indoor Skydiving 11The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE PERMIT SHEET TITLE: LOW ROOF DECK FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PERMIT DATE: 04-28-2010 PROJECT NO: 1340-2009-01 SHEET N0: S2.4 N0: OF SHEETS: 8 r_ 19'-10" (A1B) I / <54z _I 2"• 16'-31/2" d 4 1 SERVICE LEVEL 1 /8" = 1'-0" 55.1! (D 1 XE(.F) ;4: v' F 16'-31/2" -'1" 8' 2 1-37/8" 5I ---___ —Z-- — - — i= — 4 G -, 1,4 I z;,-;,- I x I. X/r/ i 10 i � _ _-;. MOMENT FRAMEIPER I/5.1— — le '^ j--------W24X55-----T-- 45.6/ 1 xx 13 I 6 I I W24X62 W14X22 H 3 IN/12X14 I 1 1 S5.3! II a W24X62 l I 31/2"CONC ON 3" 18GA METAL DECK —' .` I 3 1 �� <55.1) 3 7--------W24X55---.--- 1 I I0 I II ol- — - MOMENT-FRAMEPER 2/542— - _ - �r ?2. I i .I �I I -- ---J. 0 0 CHI 02 q 11 \ S5.1 r /41:\ \ 05.2 / 2 1, S4.2 Jr -- 0.5) AN L'1 \54.1 i - 1) /2; /3l 4 1 5 '6 PLAN NOTES 1. TYPICAL FLOOR FRAMING CONSISTS OF 31h" NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE TOPPING OVER 3" DEEP 18 GAUGE MINIMUM THICKNESS METAL DECK. SEE DETAIL 11/55.6. REINFORCE WITH 6X6 W1.401.4 WWM IN ADDITION TO REINFORCEMENT SHOWN PER PLAN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR TOP OF SLAB ELEVATIONS AND STEP LOCATIONS. 2. REFERENCE TOP OF STEEL I5 32'-41/4" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED BY [70C-XXX"j. 3. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SHORING OF METAL DECK WHERE REQUIRED PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL WALL INFORMATION. EXTERIOR STUDS SHALL BE MINIMUM 20 GAUGE WHERE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS. 5. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. 6. SEE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON 55.6 FOR COLUMN SIZES NOT NOTED ON PLANS OR ELEVATIONS. ori SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third Avenue • Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 209,443 0212 144: 206.443.4810 www.swem00nsayfa9eLcan 4-28-2010 DRAWN: D)N DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED ABB REVISION'. # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECTNILE IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 1550E PERMIT SHEET TITLE: SERVICE LEVEL FRAMING PLAN N9. 1/8" = 1'-0" PERMITOAWE,04-28-2010 PROJECT NO: 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO. S2.5 NO: OF 511EETS: 1 ROOF 1/8- = 1'-0' (AA �YB) 'J (° 54.1 / 19'-10" Y 16'-31/2" 16'-31/2" 2" 18'-37/8" 5' uJ------- -----_ —r--- ------- '----- ---(0.5) 55.2, jl �I o • 3 9 _---:-----W16X26------>----- l 3 oa I A 3) W12X14 /5 3 1 W1 X14 , In 3 .4LI e \' W18X35 i I I I 3 t \ Ss1a) 3 3" ROOFDECK W18X35 \ I I I 3 LI 3 W12X14 3 3 W17X14 3 I W16X26 = = 4 I 43 I — i 3 I o 3 W14x22 /� 5.1 / `/ / 3 26 zo S5.2 1 - 2 ) —1 3 H 4 ) 5) — —: 6 ) PLAN NOTES 1. TYPICAL FLOOR FRAMING CONSISTS 3" DEEP 18 GAUGE MINIMUM THICKNESS METAL DECK. SEE DETAIL 9/55.6. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR TOP OF SLAB ELEVATIONS AND STEP LOCATIONS. 2. REFERENCE TOP OF STEEL IS 66'-61/2" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED BY pa. -/50T]. 3. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SHORING OF METAL DECK WHERE REQUIRED PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL WALL INFORMATION. EXTERIOR STUDS SHALL BE MINIMUM 20 GAUGE WHERE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I5 PROVIDED ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS. 5. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS 10 ori SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORA TION 2124 Thine Avarua - Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 08121 ph: 206 443.6212 f4+: 206.443.4810 www.swensmisofaa)eLomm 4-28-2010 DRAWN: WN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED. ABB APPROVED ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT T IEEE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE: ROOF FRAMING PLAN arta F: 1/8" = 1'-0" PERMIT DATE' 04 28-2010 PROJECT No. 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO S2.6 8 NO: OF SHEETS: Reinforcing Splice and Development Length Schedule For fc = 4000 psi. Grade 60 Reinforcing Minimum Straight Development Length (ed) Bar Size Top Bars Other Bars :3 18" 14' :4 25" _ - 19" :5 31" 24" :6 37" 28" :7 54" 42° :8 62" 47" :9 70" 54" 710 78" 60" 711 87" 674 Minimum Lap Splice Lengths (t s) Bar Size Top Bars Other Bars #3 24° 18" :4 32" 25" :5 40" 31" 06 48" 37" :7 70" 54" :8 80" 62" 79 90" 70" 710 102' 78" 711 113" 87' TOP BARS ARE HORIZONTAL BARS WITH MORE THAN 12" DEPTH OF CONCRETE CAST BELOW THEM. IF CLEAR CONCRETE COVER 1S NOT GREATER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE BAR, OR THE CENTER TO CENTER SPACING I5 NOT GREATER THAN 3 BAR DIAMETERS, THEN LENGTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY 50% Minimum Embedment Lengths (!'dh) For Standard End Hooks Bar Size Length r 3 6" :4 7" :5 8" 76 10" 77 12" :8 13" #9 15" :10 17" 711 19" 1. SIDE COVER MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 21/2" 2. END COVER FOR 90° HOOKS MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2" 5 Reinforcing Splice Length & Development Length (4000psi) 3/4' = 1'-0' 1112' clocked r. 2 T E/ EVATOR PIT VERIFY SIZE AND DEPTH W/ ARCH DRAWINGS I as recnired 19 I. . 8. faoEa'E wall forms 9 TYPICAL ELEVATOR PIT 3/4' = 1'-0' Reinforcing Splice and Development Length Schedule For fc = 5000 psi, Grade 60 Reinforcing Minimum Straight Development Length (ed) Bar Size Top Bars Other Bars #3 17" 13" 44 22' 17" #5 28" 21" 76 33' 25" #7 48' 37" #8 55" 42" #9 62" 48" 410 70° 54" #11 78' 60° Minimum Lap Splice Lengths (e s) Bar Size Top Bars Other Bars #3 22" 17' #4 29" 22" #5 36" 28" #6 43" 33" 77 63" 48" #8 72" 55" 79 81" 62" #10 91" 70° #11 101" 78" TOP BARS ARE HORIZONTAL BARS WITH MORE THAN 12° DEPTH OF CONCRETE CAST BELOW THEM. IF CLEAR CONCRETE COVER IS NOT GREATER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE BAR, OR THE CENTER TO CENTER SPACING IS NOT GREATER THAN 3 BAR DIAMETERS, THEN LENGTHS 51-17,11 BE INCREASED BY 50% Minimum Embedment Lengths (edh) For Standard End Hooks Bar Size Length #3 6" 74 6" 75 7" #6 9" 77 10" #8 12" #9 13" 710 15" #11 17" 1. SIDE COVER MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 21/2" 2. END COVER FOR 90° 110015 MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2" SEE PLAN FOR SLAB THICKNESS AND REINFORCING (typ.) CUT ALTERNATE WIRES AT JOINT 1/8" x 1 1/2" PRE -MOLDED CONT MASTIC JOINT STRIP. pant may be saw cut at contractors option) A -- x -til-T+u ,a ,T.i;sk u. u•" P: 4?T�• ?3i s�.�-r!?-+",,Y7tY^`,�'�`iy�� 3 TYPICAL SLAB JOINTS 3/4' = 1'.0' (1):4 EAO1 NOSE Control Joint PLASTIC VAPOR BARRIER AND COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL PER PLAN SEE PLAN FOR SLAB THICKNESS AND REINFORCING (typ.) PROVIDE CONTROL OR CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN SLABS ON GRADE TO BREAK UP SLAB INTO RECTANGULAR AREAS OF 400 SQUARE FEET OR LFSS. AREAS TO BE APPROX. SQUARE AND HAVE NO ACUTE ANGLES. JOINT LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. SECOND POUR FIRST POUR BURKE "KEYKOLD"JOINT. STOP REINF. 1" CLEAR OF JOINT EACH SIDE �+','ws(�",*.-vsiYPS�?j^'�;�r"�nNt•yr�. t'{ Y,'~'i-� `rv4`rvirby ----- PLASTIC VAPOR BARRIER AND COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL PER PLAN Constructon Joint -- 74 @ Inc EA WAY - (7):4 BOTTOM 6 Reinforcing Splice Length & Development Length (5000psi) 7 TYPICAL STAIR ON GRADE 3/4' = 1'-0' 3/4' = 1'.0' tie Y'1r2 4t I '— #5 @ 16°a EACH WAY 24 44 x 24 [GR. 40 @ 16"oc 74 @ 12'oc HORIL CTRD. 74 x _i@ 10"oc VERT. CTRD. (embed 7" into pit slab) NOTE: PROVIDE MISC. METALS AS REQD. BY ELEVATOR MFR. SLAB ON GRADE -- PER PLAN (lyp.) \ m = rEXACT CONFIGURATION OF STAIR Lmduding tread and nser dimensions) PER ARCH. DRAWINGS O col & ftg. COLUMN PER PLAN — BASE PLATE PER 9/55.1 ON 3/4" NON SHRINK GROUT ISOLATION 101NT SEE 12/53.1 FOOTING SIZE AND — REINF. PER FOOTING SCHEDULE 11 TYPICAL INTERIOR FOOTING 3/4' = 1'-0' FACE OF WALL BEYOND #5 CONT. AT OPENLNGS _—� 5' 8 TYPICAL TURNED -DOWN SLAB EDGE 3/4' = 1'-0' 12 COLUMN PER PLAN Is #5 x _FGR. 40 @ 4'-0"oc SEE PLAN FOR SLAB THICKNESS AND REINFORCING (typ.) (2)45 CONT. Plan View ---- CONSTRUCTION/CONTROL JOINTS PER 3/S3.1 — 1/2" MASTIC JOINT AROUND COLUMN (typ.) TYPICAL SLAB ISOLATION JOINT JOINT AT COLUMN MAY BE ROUND AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION 3/4" = SAV GIGEI-KL RODS RESERVED Tri SWENSON SAY FAGT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2121 Third Avenue . Suite 198 . Seattle, WA 98121 p11: 2064116212 04e: 206443.4810 www.sw°nsenSa104901mm 4-28-2010 DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABS APPROVED ABB REVISION. # DESCRIPTION DATE ct71 :16616.11.45 ® }y LU N ~W moa 1U o .!U = go PROJECIb'rl IFLY``- Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE CONCRETE SECTIONS AND DETAILS ceAI F: PERMR DATE: 04-28-2010 PROJECT NO: 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO. 0 $ N0: S3.1 Or SHEETS: CORNER Ems TO —\ MATCH EXTERIOR HORIZ. REINF. CORNER BARS TO MATIN CROSS WALL HORIZ. REINF. Double Curtain CORNER 24 SS WALL 1 TYPICAL CORNER BARS AT CONCRETE WALLS AND FOOTINGS 3/4' = •• -- PIPE SLEEVES AS REQD. IN" mm 1'-6" min. 5 PIPE AND TRENCH LOCATIONS 3/4' = DOWELS TO MATCH — CMU VERT RE NE :; S0G PER PLAN EL EXCAVATION NOT ---- ALLOWED BELOW THIS UNE CMU WAIL PER PLAN PER ARCH , 3j 24 nit 12' HORIZ - -4!0 12" VERT — (E) SOG --- OUT BACK 8 REPARI AS NECESSARY 9 SECTION 1/2'=1-0• is — #4@12"TOP •-- (4) #4 CONT ALT HOOKS DIRECTION CORNER BARS TO MATCH HORIZ. REINF. �— CORNER BARS TO MATCH CROSS WALL HORT/. REINF. (at hooks) � I See Note 2 .2 greater L if / iiiill TYP. ADDITIONAL VERT, BARS ADDITIONAL VERT. BARS TYP BARS CRO' BAR CRC Double Curtain CORNER 24 SS WALL 1 TYPICAL CORNER BARS AT CONCRETE WALLS AND FOOTINGS 3/4' = •• -- PIPE SLEEVES AS REQD. IN" mm 1'-6" min. 5 PIPE AND TRENCH LOCATIONS 3/4' = DOWELS TO MATCH — CMU VERT RE NE :; S0G PER PLAN EL EXCAVATION NOT ---- ALLOWED BELOW THIS UNE CMU WAIL PER PLAN PER ARCH , 3j 24 nit 12' HORIZ - -4!0 12" VERT — (E) SOG --- OUT BACK 8 REPARI AS NECESSARY 9 SECTION 1/2'=1-0• is — #4@12"TOP •-- (4) #4 CONT ALT HOOKS DIRECTION CORNER BARS TO MATCH HORIZ. REINF. �— CORNER BARS TO MATCH CROSS WALL HORT/. REINF. (at hooks) � I See Note 2 .2 greater L .2 greater L / /� TYP. ADDITIONAL VERT. BARS BARS CRO' - Single Curtain RNER 24 WALL 12 41. STANDARD HOOK —"ti SEE NOTE #1 /3xE ANDLILES @ 6"oc (what pier width exceeds 24' use normal horizontal reinforcement) CONCRETE WALL (2)415 AT CENTERLINE OF PIER. (omit at piers 12" wide or tees) w Pier Section 3 TYPICAL OPENING REINFORCING AT CONCRETE WALLS 3/4' = 1-0" Lx Ly .3 Lx .3 greater L .2 Lx 50%— TOP BARS PER PLAN .3 greater L Ext. Support 6 TYPICAL ONE-WAY SLAB ELEVATION 3/4' = BOT, BARS PER PLAN 50% 6" .125 greater 3" o \ SEE NOTE #1 Int. Support .125 greater L NOTES: #3 TIES @ 8"oc WHEN DEPTH OF HDR. IS LESS THAN 24": REINF. PER GEN. NOTES W/ STD. HOOK TOP 8 BOT. OTHERWISE (2)#5AT TOP OF WALL OR HEADER (2)#5 x 4'-0° DIAGONAL AT EACH CORNER (2)#5 AROUND OPENINGS. EXTEND BARS 2'-0" BEYOND OPENING Notes: 1. REINFORCING SHOWN IS MINIMUM. SEE PLANS AND WALL ELEVATIONS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIRED REINFORCING. 2. PROVIDE FOR ANY OPENING SIX SOUARE FEET OR LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS, ELEVATIONS, OR DETAILS. 3. FOR WALLS THICKER THAN 8" USE #6 BARS IN LIEU OF #5 BARS SHOWN. 4. AT PIERS < 12' WIDE. PROVIDE #3 TIES @ roc AND EXTEND 1'-0" ABOVE AND BELOW LARGEST OPENING 1. AT LEAST 1/4 OF THE SPECIFIED BOTTOM REINFORCING SHALL BE CONTINUOUS THROUGH SUPPORT OR SHALL BE LAP SPLICED THROUGH SUPPORT. AT EXTERIOR SUPPORTS, TERMINATE 1/4 OF SPECIFIED BOTTOM REINFORCING WITH STANDARD HOOK. 2. .2L AND .3L APPLY TO REINFORCEMENT SHOWN CONTINUOUS THROUGH ON PLAN. b APLLIES WHERE REINFORCEMENT IS SHOWN TERMINATING AT SUPPORT ON PLAN. 3. THE LONGER BARS MUST NOT BE LESS THAN 50% OF TOTAL STEEL AREA ADDIITONAL STIRRUP EACH SIDE OF SLEEVE #6x4'-0" ABOVE AND BELOW BEAM TOP BARS TYPICAL STIRRUPS NOTE: I. OPENINGS AS SHOWN SHALL BE AS LOCATED ON PLANS ONLY. ADDITIONAL OPENINGS PROPOSED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. 8 OPENING IN CONCRETE BEAM 3/4' = 1'-0' BEAM BOTTOM BARS 6"# (max.) SLEEVE OR OPENING SIZE 0 o N a .... w . 0 ......, LU Et 2 0 C 24 8 ori SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2121 Third Avenue. Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 206.443 6212 44.: 206.14 3.4810 snatmnsaylvecmm DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED ABB REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE FGS PROJECT 11,1E: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving 'The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 AROIITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE: CONCRETE SECTIONS AND DETAILS As indicated PERMIT DATE: 04-28-2010 PROJECT N0' 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO. 1 i S3.2 9 N0: OF SHEETS: See Note 2 .2 greater L .2 greater L See Note 2 Ext. Support 6 TYPICAL ONE-WAY SLAB ELEVATION 3/4' = BOT, BARS PER PLAN 50% 6" .125 greater 3" o \ SEE NOTE #1 Int. Support .125 greater L NOTES: #3 TIES @ 8"oc WHEN DEPTH OF HDR. IS LESS THAN 24": REINF. PER GEN. NOTES W/ STD. HOOK TOP 8 BOT. OTHERWISE (2)#5AT TOP OF WALL OR HEADER (2)#5 x 4'-0° DIAGONAL AT EACH CORNER (2)#5 AROUND OPENINGS. EXTEND BARS 2'-0" BEYOND OPENING Notes: 1. REINFORCING SHOWN IS MINIMUM. SEE PLANS AND WALL ELEVATIONS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIRED REINFORCING. 2. PROVIDE FOR ANY OPENING SIX SOUARE FEET OR LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS, ELEVATIONS, OR DETAILS. 3. FOR WALLS THICKER THAN 8" USE #6 BARS IN LIEU OF #5 BARS SHOWN. 4. AT PIERS < 12' WIDE. PROVIDE #3 TIES @ roc AND EXTEND 1'-0" ABOVE AND BELOW LARGEST OPENING 1. AT LEAST 1/4 OF THE SPECIFIED BOTTOM REINFORCING SHALL BE CONTINUOUS THROUGH SUPPORT OR SHALL BE LAP SPLICED THROUGH SUPPORT. AT EXTERIOR SUPPORTS, TERMINATE 1/4 OF SPECIFIED BOTTOM REINFORCING WITH STANDARD HOOK. 2. .2L AND .3L APPLY TO REINFORCEMENT SHOWN CONTINUOUS THROUGH ON PLAN. b APLLIES WHERE REINFORCEMENT IS SHOWN TERMINATING AT SUPPORT ON PLAN. 3. THE LONGER BARS MUST NOT BE LESS THAN 50% OF TOTAL STEEL AREA ADDIITONAL STIRRUP EACH SIDE OF SLEEVE #6x4'-0" ABOVE AND BELOW BEAM TOP BARS TYPICAL STIRRUPS NOTE: I. OPENINGS AS SHOWN SHALL BE AS LOCATED ON PLANS ONLY. ADDITIONAL OPENINGS PROPOSED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. 8 OPENING IN CONCRETE BEAM 3/4' = 1'-0' BEAM BOTTOM BARS 6"# (max.) SLEEVE OR OPENING SIZE 0 o N a .... w . 0 ......, LU Et 2 0 C 24 8 ori SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2121 Third Avenue. Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 206.443 6212 44.: 206.14 3.4810 snatmnsaylvecmm DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED ABB REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION DATE FGS PROJECT 11,1E: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving 'The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 AROIITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE: CONCRETE SECTIONS AND DETAILS As indicated PERMIT DATE: 04-28-2010 PROJECT N0' 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO. 1 i S3.2 9 N0: OF SHEETS: HOOK TOP LAYER (4) #8 BARS — INTO WALL BELOW (4) #5 @ SIM SOG PER RAN UPTURNED 03NC BM PER PUN CONC WALL PER PIM -7/ HOOK BOT LAYER PLENUM DECK ;L 4'-5" 1 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 3/4" = 1-.0- 3/4" = 1'-0" (E) COLUMN -- WHERE OCCURS — DOWELS TO MATCH WALL VERT REINF CMU WALL PER PLAN / SOG PER PIAN (E) COLUMN FOOTING WHERE OCCURS 6 SECTION 3/4" = 1-0" (3) #4 COM STOP FTG WHERE (E) FTG OCCURS, DOWEL & EPDXY W/ (2) #4x26" EMBED 4" EA SIDE 1' - 0' 1' - 0" • 'i (2) #8 TOP ,�— 45@12'EF /-44@12' CONC SLAB —� PER PLAN (4) 48 BOT DOWELS PER — PLAN PLENUM DECK —' 4'. 5" : 7 SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" — (4) #STOP ,- • CONC SLAB -- PER PLAN " DOWELS PER PLAN 4 SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" CONC WALL PER PLAN BAMBINO DRAINAGE PER CNIL/GEOTECH #5@12'EF #5@12" PLENUM DECK 4'-5" (8) 48 BOT I1/2"CIR--—3/4"CLR #7x L@ 11' s� 8 SECTION 3/4" = 1-0" DOWELS TO MATCH VERT REINF MAT SLAB PLENUM I�, •i '12'-71/4" ". d 0 ori SWENSON SAY FACET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third Avarua. Sidle 100 - Seattle, WA 98121 p0: 206443.621 fav:206443.4810 wwwswensonsayfaget. 4-28-2010 DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED, ABB APPROVED. ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE 5 PROJECT 11 TLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 AROIITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 55110'. PERMIT SHEET TTTl.E: CONCRETE SECTIONS AND DETAILS STALE. 3/4" = 1'-0" PERMIT DATE: 04-28-2010 PROJECT 90. 1340-2009-01 'i SHEET NO. R S3.3 $ N0: OF SHEETS: .4) TYP AT BRACED FRAME COWMM SPLICE ( 3 ) (2) „- (0.5) 2 GRID B BRACED FRAME ELEVATION 1/8' = ROOF Au 68' - 91/22" ' SERVICE LEVEL 55' -11 1/2^ MID LEVEL BOS 45'-9" LOW ROOF DECK al %4" 33'-23 '-, OBSERVATION DECK AL 20'-93/4" PLENUM DECK GROUND FLOOR n^ 7 PLENUM _-12'-71/4'. __ 12 1 • W74XSS 1 I 1 1 .1 I yCr- I y 'Y9.Y 9 i x9xlY .Yq�l/—� ,�yr• Y .k%0l -�b� I �1, f.�S� ,10 1 1 W29X55 1_ - ------I ---4 ---.1 HSSSX 1?N HSS4X4X1/. I irk Ss„ 111111-,0(Hss`.X1X5/16 ) HSS4X4X114 1 I-� ) \N •I --- f (N�) (''''"1-.)\ gi Nd 1-3 — — — sa84 1 1�1 1 r s5.17 ..--.' W21055 TW - 8 8P v, 55.5 / ----/' I/ B 1 / 9 ” 1 1 \ 55.4 /1\ 55.4 �� , 4 ....---., ( 1 \ OPP n', 55.4, / 1 \ ` S5.4 % N s - - m I I I s I 1 i — —a I I ) l Ill 1 �1 — —i, 1 I A 5, SS11.s AT BRACE EWE I i I I ,1-- EI �.* _ — _ — \ 6YSEPIATE 1 I l II 1 2 GRID B BRACED FRAME ELEVATION 1/8' = ROOF Au 68' - 91/22" ' SERVICE LEVEL 55' -11 1/2^ MID LEVEL BOS 45'-9" LOW ROOF DECK al %4" 33'-23 '-, OBSERVATION DECK AL 20'-93/4" PLENUM DECK GROUND FLOOR n^ 7 PLENUM _-12'-71/4'. __ 12 1 • W74XSS 1 l I I II II I1 11 11 II 13 L it 1 GRID 2 MOMENT FRAME ELEVATION v8• = 1'-O• II II I! 11 I ROOF 68'-91/2" 5 SERVICE LEVEL ,1, 55' • 11 1/2" '-, MID LEVEL BOS 45'-9" LOW ROOF DEO( 33'-23/4" OBSERVATION DECK 20'-93/4" PLENUM DECK -- GROUND FLOOR - D li PLENUM -12' -71/4" 1 rri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Thi A Avenue • Sure 100 -Seattle. W A 18121 ph: 206 443.6212 12r: 206.4434810 40v4.5wenwnsaytageLCam 4-28-2010 DRAWN: WN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISION,: # DESCRIPTION DATE (sn .0 PROJECT TIRE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHrrECl. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TIRE: LATERAL ELEVATIONS SC LE: 1/8,. = 1'-0 PERMIT DATE:04-28-2010 PROJECT 80. 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO: S4.1 ND: OF SHEETS: 1 1 .1 I 1 W29X55 lI i — —i 1 1�1 1 r s5.17 ..--.' W21055 1 1 I1 4 6 S5.1 ) I II 1W7eYst 1 1 0 1 55 5 / I 1 l I I II II I1 11 11 II 13 L it 1 GRID 2 MOMENT FRAME ELEVATION v8• = 1'-O• II II I! 11 I ROOF 68'-91/2" 5 SERVICE LEVEL ,1, 55' • 11 1/2" '-, MID LEVEL BOS 45'-9" LOW ROOF DEO( 33'-23/4" OBSERVATION DECK 20'-93/4" PLENUM DECK -- GROUND FLOOR - D li PLENUM -12' -71/4" 1 rri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Thi A Avenue • Sure 100 -Seattle. W A 18121 ph: 206 443.6212 12r: 206.4434810 40v4.5wenwnsaytageLCam 4-28-2010 DRAWN: WN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISION,: # DESCRIPTION DATE (sn .0 PROJECT TIRE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHrrECl. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TIRE: LATERAL ELEVATIONS SC LE: 1/8,. = 1'-0 PERMIT DATE:04-28-2010 PROJECT 80. 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO: S4.1 ND: OF SHEETS: is, C52 4 1 GRID D BRACED FRAME ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" ROOF 68' - 9 1/2" _ SERVICE LEVEL _ 55'-111/2" 5, MID LEVEL BOS 45' - 9" TIP TIP AT BRACED FAME COLUMN SPLICE LOW ROOF DECK 33'-23/4" ' _OBSERVATION DECK 20' - 9 3/4" PLENUM DECK GROUND FLOOR jio PLENUM -12' 71/4 , 3 1 4 1 1 ~ W2 X55 1 I 1 W2 X5510 1 ma �N�) I (N-.) I -1--/ 1 / / HSSSx5X5/6 1IMIEBEI SS,,,,,,, c_o ' —)._____, 1 . ;stl _X n* 9 i HSS5X5X5/1 \ SS4X4X 1/4 1---;--r--- 1 - - (S5.1 1 8 1,, HSS6X6XxII HSS5X5X5/ SS4X4X1/4 �X9ti \`�e+� : y(----- v\��. .. �9_..00:' . „�y��s •. s_ X1/4 0, HSS6X6X B :_::_if,',ti/ SS5X5X_5/4 �(f � USS4X4X1/4 t _I 6 �.; \ '1 .55.4 4 SS. ,1 6 )I 1 1 ice \ � — — �558.51 ---44d 7( _t I \ S5.4 \ OPP S5.4 7, 55.4 HSS6X6X3/8 ` ,- �9 20 P – – — ( 1\'BRACE FRAME S5.5, /��10 fj 1� ti PIP AT )BRACE FRAME 55.5 / &15EPLATE I N I 1 1 GRID D BRACED FRAME ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" ROOF 68' - 9 1/2" _ SERVICE LEVEL _ 55'-111/2" 5, MID LEVEL BOS 45' - 9" TIP TIP AT BRACED FAME COLUMN SPLICE LOW ROOF DECK 33'-23/4" ' _OBSERVATION DECK 20' - 9 3/4" PLENUM DECK GROUND FLOOR jio PLENUM -12' 71/4 , 3 1 4 1 1 ~ W2 X55 1 I 1 W2 X5510 1 (S5.1 1 1 1 W2 X55( 4 6 )I 1 1 l'—') w2xss 4 55., ROOF _ 68' - 91/2" _ _ SERVICE LEVEL - 55' - 11 1/2" MID LEVEL BOS 45'-9" LOW ROOF DECK 33'-23/4" OBSERVATION DECK 1 20'-93/4" PLENUM DECK GROUND FLOOR 2 GRID 5 MOMENT FRAME ELELVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" PLENUM -12'-7 1/4" 0 LLI tai rri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Hind Avenue - Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 98121 ph:206 443.6212 fax:2064114870 rww.s mvosarfa9el.lan 4-28-2010 DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT TITLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 IS5UE', PERMIT SHEET TIRE: LATERAL ELEVATIONS g a SCALE: PERMIT DATE 04.28-2010 PROJECT No: 02 1340-2009-01 i SHEET NO, S4.2 3 N0: OF SHEETS: FACE OF SUPPORTING MEMBER Shear Plate Schedule SHEAR PLATE SIZE AND BOLTS PER SCHEDULE W/ STD. ROUND HOLES IN PLATE 1 1/2° FOR 3/4 BOLTS 1 3/4" FOR 1 BOLTS Beam Size No. of Bolts Bolt Size Plate Thickness Weld Size Capacity W8,W10 2 3/4"< 1/4" 3/16" 8k W12 3 3/4"c 1/4' 3/16" 16k W14 3 3/4"< 1/4" 3/16" 166 W16 4 3/4"a 1/4" 3/16" 26k W18 5 3/4"a 1/4" 3/16" 36k W21 4 1"< 3/8" 5/16" 46k W24 5 1"4 3/8" 5/16" 63k W27 6 1"c 3/8" 5/16" 76k W30 7 1 1"< 3/8" 5/16" 89k BOLT TYPE A325N, ... MATERIAL - A36 1 TYPICAL SINGLE SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION AND SCHEDULE 3/4' = 1'-0" (2) 3/4 BOLTS AT BEAM GAGE (4) 3/4 BOLTS AT BEAM GAGE BEAM SIZE PER PLAN BEARING PL 1/2" COLUMN PER PLAN Where Beam Stops J Where Beam Continues NOTE: BEARING PLATE THICKNESS SHALL BE 3/4" WHERE DEPTH OF SUPPORTED MEMBER EXCEEDS 24" 5 TYPICAL BEAM BEARING ON HSS OR PIPE COLUMN 3/4" = 1'-0' PL 1/2 114L"' 9 BASEPLATE - HSS COLUMN 3/4' = 1'-0' COLUMN PER PLAN (2) 3/4"c ANCHOR BOLTS COLUMN PER PLAN BEAM SIIE PER PLAN J NOTE: BEARING PLATE THICKNESS SHALL BE 3/4' WHERE DEPTH OF SUPPORTED MEMBER EXCEEDS 24' 6 BEAM SUPPORTING HSS OR PIPE COLUMN 3/4' = 1'-0" NOTIFY ENGINEER FOR DIRECTION IF EXCEEDED 44 CONT. EDGE FORM BY METAL DECK INSTALLER - DESIGN SUCH THAT SHORING 15 NOT REQUIRED PER PLAN 12° max. BEARING PL 1/2" W/ (4) 3/4 BOLTS AT BEAM GAGE , per deck welding notes n #3x L SPACED PER SCHEDULE BELOW 3/4" CLR. FROM T.O.51AB SEE PLAN FOR METAL DECK AND TOPPING WF BEAM PER PLAN BEAM BOTH SIDES WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN per schedule BEAM SIZE PER PLAN, I 1 PLATE THICKNESS AND TYPICAL BOLTS PER SCHEDULE 3 TYPICAL BEAM TO BEAM CONNECTION 3/4' = 1'-0" AT CORNER COLUMNS EXTEND PLATE FOR LARGER BEAM THROUGH ' SIZE WT TO SUIT TUBE DIMENSIONS per (St -1-01) 4— PLATE PER (51-1-01) Plan Views DIMENSIONS PER (1/55.1) BACKING BAR 3/8"xl" BEVELED PLATE THICKNESS AND BOLTING PER 1/55.1 MEMBER SIZES PER PLAN, TYPICAL 4 TYPICAL SKEWED BEAM SHEAR CONNECTION 3/4" = 1-0" MEMBER SIZES PER PLAN of ol+ 0 o I per(11S5.1) per (1/S5.1) �— WT SECTION W/ WEB AND FLANGE THICKNESS AT LEAST THAT OF PLATE THICKNESS AS SPECIFIED IN (1/55.1) KERF PLATE PER (1/55.1) NOTES: • KERF NOT REQUIRED FOR W12 AND SMALLER BEAMS. USE STANDARD PLATE WELDED TO FACE OF TUBE • USE THICKER PLATE PER (1/55.1) WHERE BEAMS OPPOSITE SIDES DIFFER IN SIZE. • NO KERF REQUIRED AT COLUMN CORNERS. WELD PLATE TO FACE OF COLUMN. if COPE BEAM FLANGES AS REQUIRED DIMENSIONS PER (1/55.1) PLATE THICKNESS AND BOLTING PER SCHEDULE (1/55.1) KERF COLUMN AND EXTEND PLATE THROUGH COLUMN. SEE NOTES AT LEFT. 7 BEAM TO CONTINOUS HSS COLUMN - END OR CORNER p BEAM TO CONTINOUS HSS COLUMN - INTERIOR 3/4" = 1'-0" C7 3/4' = 1'-0' NOTIFY ENGINEER FOR DIRECTION IF EXCEEDED 44 CONT. PER PLAN 18" max. EDGE FORM BY METAL DECK INSTALLER - DESIGN SUCH THAT SHORING IS NOT REQUIRED SHEAR CONNECTORS PER PLAN WHERE OCCURS per deck welding notes 12 #3 x SPACED PER SCHEDULE BELOW 3/4" OR. FROM T.O. SLAB SEE PLAN FOR METAL DEO( AND TOPPING WF BEAM PER PLAN Spacing Schedule Spacing Schedule L <4'' OMIT #3 BARS L <6"' OMIT #3 BARS 4"<L58" 8 4L<12" 32"oc 24"oc 6'<L<10' 32"oc 10" < 1 18" 24"oc pax—L@24"oc 16 DROP DECK PER PLAN INTERIOR OCT .61 1 O CANTILEVERED FLOOR DECK PARALLEL TO BEAM 1 1 CANTILEVERED FLOOR DECK PERPENDICULAR TO BEAM , 1 2 FLOOR DECK STEP , 3/4' = 1'-0' 3/4' = 1'-0' 3/4" = 1'-0' 26 LOCATION PER ARCH (1)#4 CONT. PROVIDE L 2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 LDPYRIG41� c 2%7 SVENS SAYGPDEI • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED rri SWENSON SAY FACET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third Avenue - %Pa 100 • Seattle. WA 98121 ph'. 209443.6212 34x: 206.443.4870 ww.swensonsaylayei.can DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE (4:) czsbri PROJECT 111E E: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 JSSUE PERMIT SHEET TITLE: TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" PERMIT DATE: 04-28-201 0 PROJECT NO: 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO S5.1 NO: OF SHEETS: 1. FOR HOLES 4" DIA. OR LESS OR 4' SQUARE OR LESS: NO STRENGTHENING IS REQUIRED PROVIDED THAT HOLES ARE NOT CLOSER THAN 12"oc 2. FOR HOLES GREATER THAN 4" UP TO 8' DIA. OR 8" SQUARE: PROVIDED HOLES ARE NOT CLOSER THAN 3'-0"oc #4 TRIM BAR (4 SIDES) EXTEND 2'-0" BEYOND OPENING Section at Deck With Concrete Fill 3. FOR HOLES GREATER THAN 8" UP T024" DIA. OR 24' SQUARE: PROVIDE L 2x2xE AS SHOWN BELOW: HOLE r A r%1 I /-1C 6" MIN. TERMINATE PLATE ON RIDGE TO WELD 3/4' plug ` welds typ. Section A 3' 24' 3" \ max. HOLE max. 1 FLOOR DECK REINFORCEMENT AT SMALL OPENINGS 3/4" = 1'-0" X i 112", puddle weld max, 4 12"oc 14 GA. GALV. BENT PL ---- EDGE FORM 1 5 ROOF DECK PARALLEL TO BEAM 3/4" = NO WELDING TO SUPPORTING BEAM FLANGE SHEAR CONN. PER 10/S5.1 L \ Section per 9/33.6 L BEAM PER PLAN — AND SCHEDULE \ T SUPPORTING BEAM PER PLAN Beams with Same Depth FLANGE PLATE TOP AND BOTTOM PER SCHEDULE 9 BEAM TO BEAM MOMENT CONNECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" 8 - Square or Round Holes of Deck Without Concrete Fill 12 GA STEEL STRENGTHENING PLATE 1/2" WELDS @ 4"oc MAX. Section A -s, 1/2" LONG FILLET WELDS EA. RIDGE c 2 CELLS FOR C=8" TO 14" OR 3 CELLS FOR C=14" TO 24" (TYP.) I-- HOLE -- #4 TRIM BAR (4 SIDES) EXTEND 2'-0" BEYOND OPENING size per sched. use 1" return v 1 —r Section sae per schedule DECK INC L 3x3x5/16 fR 2 0 L 3x3x5116 L 3x3x5116 100001/ L 3x 3x 116 Plan View L 3x3x5/16 EACH SIDE LI 1/16 V ;Np / 3/16 l' ' Section NOTES: ° WELD DECK TO ANGLES W/ 1/2", PUDDLE WELDS @ 6"oc ALL AROUND NO REINFORCING I5 REQUIRED FOR SINGLE OPENINGS 4 OR 4" SQ. OR LESS ° LARGER OPENINGS MUST BE COORDINATED W/ARCHITECT & ENGINEER C8x11.5 NOTES: MAIN BEAMS Partial Plan TYPICAL BEAM / TO BEAM CONN. ��- METAL DECK SPANS IN THIS DIRECTION ° WELD DECK TO MEMBERS WITH 1/2" DIA. PUDDLE WELDS @ 6"oc ALL AROUND 3 FLOOR DECK REINFORCEMENT AT LARGE OPENINGS 3/4' = 1-0" / D/3 2 HOLES (MAX.) METAL DECK WELDS ALL AROUND HOLE LOCATE 03 AT FIRST LOW FLUTE NEAREST EDGE OF OPENING -- PROVIDE (2)L 6x4x5/16 OR 4" FILLET WELD 4" LONG EACH SIDE OF WEB AT CONTRACTORS OPTION Section A FOR HOLES GREATER THAN 24"., OR 24" SQ. - U.O.N. ON PLAN 1" RADIUS CORNERS \� lZm7n !l R? Sx 'tote o SIZEI- 213 D max. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF ALL BEAM PENETRATIONS WITH MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. ALL PENETRATIONS LARGER THAN 2":%SHALL BE SHOWN ON SHOP DRAWINGS OR SKETCHES AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. FIELD CUTTING NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL. 2. OPENINGS MAY OCCUR IN MIDDLE HALF OF BEAM LENGTH ONLY. 3. NO CUrnNG MAY OCCUR IN TOP OR BOTTOM QUARTER OF BEAM DEPTH. 4, ADJACENT OPENINGS MUST BE SPACED AT THE LESSER OF, 12" OR 2.5 x LARGER OPENING SIZE, EDGE TO EDGE. 5. MAXIMUM SIZES OF OPENINGS SHALL BE 0/3 < OR0/3 x 2D/3 AS SHOWN. 6. NO OPENINGS SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 12" OF AN ADJACENT BEAM CONNECTION. 7, REQUIRED OPENINGS NOT MEETING ABOVE CRITERIA SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ENGINEER FOR REINFORCING DESIGN. 6 ROOF DECK REINFORCEMENT AT OPENINGS 7 STEEL BEAM PENETRATIONS 3/4" = 1'-0" 3/4" = 1'-0" Moment Connection Schedule Beam Size Flange Plates (thickness & width) Top Bottom L Weld Size W16X26 518x4 318x7 12' ( 1/4' NO WELDING TO SUPPORTING BEAM \ FLANGE Section L _ BEAM PER PLAN T AND SCHEDULE MAINTAIN D' CLEAR DISTANCE AROUND FLANGE PLATE SUPPORTING BEAM --� PER PLAN SHEAR CONN. PER /S_ FLANGE PLATE TOP AND BOTTOM PER SCHEDULE size per sched. use 1' retum Beams of Varying Depth Section COLUMN CONTINUOUS WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN BEAM EACH SIDE — WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN COLUMN SIZE PER PLAN BEAM SIZE PER PLAN PLATE THICKNESS AND BOLTING PER SCHEDULE (1/S5.1) 8 BEAM TO COLUMN FLANGE CONNECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" 0 C=. �a 20 2g0 u 7 SWENSON SPY FPGE7 PLL RIGHTS RESERVEG Tri SWENSON SAY FAGrT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third Avenue - Suite 100 -Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 2064404212 fax: 2064430870 4-28-2010 DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISION'.: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT 1 ,TLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE: TYPICAL STEEL DETAILS SfAI F: 3/4" = 1'-0" PERMIT DATE:04-28-2010 PROJECT NO. 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO: S5.2 OF SHEETS: 4 S Pro 1 SECTION 1 1/2" = CMU WAIL PER PIAN SLAB ON MR DECK PER PLAN 1 14x4x1/4 W/ 5/8'DIA THREADED RODS IN EPDXY @ 7-6" OC EMBED 5 5/B' MIN 1/4 7 HSS COL PER PLAN SLOPE PER ARCH 5/8" DIA BOLT (OPTIONAL FOR ERECTION AID) HSS BM PER MAN k \ 3/4".1. GUSSET P15/16 114 1‘,. TYP.' 1/41,/ 2 SECTION 1 1/2' = 1-0" 115588 PER PLAN L4x4x1/4x???? TOP & BOT 6 SECTION 1 1/2' = 1'-0' WATERPROOFING AND FLASHING PER ARCH. EXISTING FRAMING (E) PARTITION WALL TO REMAIN FOR CALLOUTS IN COMMON REFER 4/55.3 (2)44 CONT. TOP (2)#4 x 4'-0" BELOW BEAM CONNECTION 8" CMU WALL PER PLAN 3 SECTION A SECTION 3/4' = 1'-0' `'F 3/4" = 1'-0" CONT. L 6x2x16ga W/ #10 SCREWS @ 6"oc INTO METAL DECK & 3/8 x 13/4' TITEN SCREWS @ 6"oc INTO CMU 3" WIDE PLATE TO MATCH -- - WEBBING THICKNESS (veirfy for fit -up) ADD WEBBING BAR TO —� \ MATCH EXISTING IN FIELD \ \ \1 i I CUT TOP & 90T. CHORDS -AFTER INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY JOIST SHORING L. :[:>=1 4 1'9Q:::20aid•=.Mro6nane lr TEMPORARY SHORING OF EXISTING JOISTS BY GEN. CONTRACTOR 4 L 6x4x5/16 x 11" W/ (2) 3/4 x 6" TITEN SCREW ANCHORS @ 8"oc EL. PER ARCH. 2x8 TOP PLATE W/ 1/2 A.B. @ 48"oc (embed 5") C7x9.8 x 24" W/ (2) 5/8"o x 6" WHS @ 16"oc (break CMU face shell as required for installation) STEEL BEAM PER PLAN CONN. PER 1/55.1 (field weld) 8" CMU WALL PER PLAN (2)#4 x 8'-0" ABOVE & BELOW BEAM CONN. 7 SECTION Q SECTION 3/4' = 1'-0" V 3/4" = 1'-0• STIFF. PL, TYP. SEE SCHED.FOR THICKNESS stiff. PL to col. fl. weld per sated. beam . @ column . u.o.n. , sheer PL to sub. PL weld per sdled. BOLTS, PLATES, AND WELDS PER 1/55.1 UNLESS NOTED HERE col web weld per schedule Elevation 3" IF bf < 9 1/2" 4'IF9112"<bf<111/2" 5" IF BF > 11 1/2" * 1 1/2" FOR 3/4"o BOLTS 13/4" FOR 1"0 BOLTS 11 BEAM TO COLUMN WEB CONNECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" C15x33.9 x 40" W/ (2) 5/8"4x6"WHS @16"oc 6 TOTAL (break 048 face shell as req'd for installation) — STEEL BEAM PER PLAN CONN. PER 1/55.1 (field weld) Shear & Stiffener Plate Schedule Beam Size Stiff. Plate Thickness Shear Plate to Col. Web Weld Shear Plate to Stiff. Weld Stiff. to Col. Flange Weld Capacity W8, W10 1/4" 3/16" 3/16" 3/16" Bk W12 1/4" 3/16° 3/16" 3/16" 16k W14 1/4" 3/16" 3/16" 3/16" 16k W16 1/4" 3/16" 3/16" 3/16" 26k W18 3/8" 3/16" 3/16" 3/16" 36k W21 1/2" 5/16' 5/16" 3/16" 4641 W24 5/8" 5/16' 5/16" 1/4" 63k W27 5/8" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 76k W30 7/8" 1/4" 1/4" 5/16" 89k gyri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third Avenue - Suite 100 - Seattle. WA 98121 99: 206 443.6212 fax: 206443.4810 www.swemmnsavfage0o, 4-28-2010 DRAWN: DJN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED: ABB APPROVED: ABB REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE Et • ALL WHYS HESE PROLE LLICI cc% O g0 IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE: STEEL SECTIONS AND DETAILS As indicated PERMIT DATE: 04-28-2010 PROJECT NO. 1340-2009-01 a SHEET NO. b X S5.3 6 N0: OF SHEETS: HSS COL PER BF ELEV <5S5.4 HSS 8M TO MATCH BRACE FRAME BEAM SIZE WF BM PER PLAN 1 SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" CP MF COL i MF BM — CONN PER 12/55.4 T&B FLGS/ PL 5/16 x"t" DIMENSION - OF 8M 5 SECTION 3/4' = 1'-0" 4/2" 6I'� 114 ( 6" I 6I,"/ 114 (2) 5/8"o 80105 (OPTIONAL ERECTION AID) PL 5/16 STIFF PL 1/4 EA SIDE WELD PER 11/S5.3, TYP (BA (, S5.4 — FIELD SPLICE PER 10/55.4 8 Detail 13 3/4' = 1'-0' 4.-0" ABOVE FF r COL PER ELEV TOS PER PLAN MFBM PER ELEV — MF COL I JI ! PER ELEV I L11 SECTION A MOMENT FRAME COL PER EIEV \� CJP . 6A 11( 55.4 / TYP —� 71161 #9 A706x2'fi' WELD BARS #9A706x . WELD BARS W/ STD 600X #9 A706x l WELD BMW STD HOOK EMBED PL2x12x2'-9" W/ (16) WELD BARS i #3x0 @ 4" 11•11®1®1!1 1' .1' 1 1 111 1 1 1 . 68 55 4 r 6 Section 3/4" = 1'-0" CJP EA FLG CONN PER 52/55.4 SIMILAR DETAIL A \ • I^{ #9 A706x ;741_ WELD BARS W/ STD HOOK #9 A7065 4l WELD BARS W/ STD HOOK — STIRRUPS PER UPTURNED CONC BM DETAIL `. BOTTOM REINF PER UPTURNED CONC BM DETAIL (6) #8 VERT .— #4x[1@8' DETAIL B II r FIELD SPLICE I/ PER 10/55.4 (21 tbf 33) 3/4° min. 15. (4) TOLERANCES SHALL NOT ACCUMULATE TO THE EXTENT THAT THE ANGLE OF THE ACCESS HOLE CUT TO THE FLANGE SURFACE EXCEEDS 25° (Pi —� V 4) ?) ,1 1 —I (3) 3/4" min. 1 1 tbf NOTES: 1 11 BEVEL AS REQUIRED 8Y AWS D1.1 FOR SELECTED GROOVE WELD PROCEDURE. 1 2) LARGER OF BEAM FLANGE THICKNESS (tbf ) OR 1/2 Inds. (PLUS 1/2 tbfbtOR MINUS 1/2 tbf ) 13) 3/4 tbf TO tbf ,1/2 inch MINIMUM (6 1/4 Sid) (4) 3/8 inch MINIMUM RADIUS (PWS NOT LIMITED, OR MINUS 0) 1 5) 3 tbf. (6 1/2 inch) 7 MOMENT FRAME ACCESS HOLE 3/4" = COLUMN PER MOMENT FRAME • ELEVATION WELD ACCESS HOLE PER 6/55.4 COLUMN PER MOMENT FRAME ELEVATION 0 0 FINISH FLOOR EL CJP ())—• CONTINUITY PLATE --1 1\ SHALL EXTEND FLUSH WICOIUMN FLANGES \ \ BEAM I a b c W24x55 4" 20' 1.75' NO ATTACHMENTS OF ANY KIND THERMAL CUTTING SHALL BE USED TO REDUCE BEAM FLANGE. MAXIMUM SURFACE ROUGHNESS SHALL BE 500 MICRO INCHES J CJP FULL LENGTH OF BEAM WEB BETWEEN WELD ACCESS HOLES T CONNECTION BOTH SIDES @ SIM. .4 NOTES: (1 ) CJP GROOVE WELD AT TOP AND BOTTOM RANGES. REMOVE WELD BACKING BACKGOUGE, AND ADD 5116" MINIMUM FILLET WELD. AT TOP FLANGE, WELD BACKING MAY BE LEFT IN PLACE. ADD 5/16" MIN. FILLET WELD BELOW BACKER BAR. BACKING SHALL NOT BE WELDED (INCLUDING TACK WELDING) TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE BEAM FLANGE. ! 2 : WELD ACCESS HOLE, SEE DETAIL 7/S5.4 13) (2) 314" o BOLTS FOR ERECTION. 1 4) SHEAR TAB: THICKNESS EBEAM WEB THICKNESS, 318" MIN.. SHEAR TAB LENGTH SHALL BE AS TO ALLOW 1/8" OVERLAP WITH THE WELD ACCESS HOLE AT TOP AND BOTTOM, AND THE WIDTH SHALL EXTEND 2" MINIMUM BACK ALONG THE BEAM, BEYOND THE END OF THE WELD ACCESS HOLE. 1 5) CONTINUITY PLATE: THICKNESS PLATE > BEAM FLANGE THICKNESS. PLATE SHALL BE 50 ksi STEEL. f:6) REMOVE WELD TABS TO 1)4" MAXIMUM FROM EDGE OF CONTINUITY PLATE. GRIND END OF WELD SMOOTH (500 u -in), NOT FLUSH. DO NOT GOUGE -- COLUMN FLANGE. tCD 0 1.11 11,1 4:, �O 080 9 Detail 12 . 1 TYPICAL MOMENT FRAME COLUMN SPLICE 1 S5.4 -12n 3/4' = 1'-0' 1' 3/4' = -0' 3/4' = ON SA'i FAGE1-ALL RIGHTS RESERVED rri SWENSON SAY FAGOT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third A.etue - Suite ID) -Seattle, WA 98121 ph: 206.443.6212 fax: 206 4434870 www.ssambnsaNayeccan 4-28-2010 DRAWN: Author DESIGN: Designer CHECKED Checker APPROVED: Approver REVISION`.: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT DILE IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE PERMIT SHEET TRUE: MOMENT FRAME DETAILS SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" PERMIT "TE 04 28-2010 PROJECT NO 1340-2009-01 SHEET NO. S5.4 S NO: OF SHEETS: 1— (2)5/8' BOLT FOR „4„,_1 ERECTION, OPTIONAL aA 1 / - 1p� BM PER PLAN - �.5 / 1 CAP PL1)2 — -b 0 WF BM PER ELEV, —� o. COPE FLG5 ONE SIDE Jp_OO, 113, 5/8" DIA BOLT — FOR ERECTION OPTIONAL HSS BRACE — PER ELEV 3 DETAIL 1 1/2' = 1'-0" CP r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 I 111 1—„_J. BOLTED CONN PER 1)S5.I -n CI I 0 EM PER PLAN `-- GUSSET P11/2 141 \ SECTION A li HSS COL PER ELEV — PL3)4xRQD 7 BRACE FRAME COLUMN SPLICE 1 1/2' = 1'-0” COLUMN PER ELEVATION 58161 TYP 51161 11A lk S5.5 % CP 0 0 FINISH FLOOR EL ' ,� �' CE PER ELEVATION Jam - 21' %. !z TYP EA SIDE 1 ' 81 5n6 T.O. WALL HSS HORIZ. MEMBER PER ELEV 5'8' GUSSET PLATE BRACE PER E -EV HSS COLUMN PER ELEVATION 1 SECTION 3/4" = 8 SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0' - BRACE PER ELEVATION - 518' GUSSET PLATE PLAN A BASE FL1 1/2 W/ (0) 11/8" F 1554 GR55 ANCHOR BOLTS (8) r8VERT I. r 1 _ "� ... #4xu@8" .. Z Q 1 - .TO BOTTOM OF WALL P. = SHEET NO. PLAN B W v J al 11 SECTION AM"3/4' = I-0" fie8 N0: OF SHEETS: gyri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Mi,d Avenue - Suite 100- Sea¢le, WA 98121 p0: 206 443.6212 fax: 206443.4810 wwwswensonsaVrag2ECO4n 4-28-2010 DRAWN: DIN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED Checker APPROVED ABB REVISION:: # DESCRIPTION DATE M `CDd PROJECT 71TLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT: Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE' PERMIT SHEET1TTLE BRACE FRAME DETAILS S5.5 ROOF ROOF 68 9 112' SERVICE LEVEL at 5 N x 68 - 91/7 SERVICE LEVEL 55'• 1112' MID LEVEL BOS 0 3 1 c 55'-111/2 AID LEVEL BOS 45'-9' LOW ROOFLOW DECK x i S g 3 45'-9' ROOF DECK 33'-23//2 OBSERVATION DECK X HSS6X6X3/6 33'-2314' OBSERVATION DECK 20-93/4' PLENUM DECK HSS6X6X5/16 f to 4< X N 2 X HSS4X4X1/4 20-93/4' PLENUM DECK 4' - 5' GROUND FLOOR 4' - 5' GROUND FLOOR R PLENUM — — 0' PLENUM -12' • 7 1/4' -12 - 7114- Colurtn Locations 9&1,&6, 0 -T0 -6C.55 B3, B-4 6.5 2, B,5 5, C.5.2. 8.9.0.5, D.0.5, E.2-0.5 03, 5-4 [2.1.9 NOTES: 1. COLUMN SPLICE DESIGNATE BY = SEE DUCTILE COLUMN SPLICE 2/55.6. STEEL COLUMN SCHEDULE 1/8" = 1'-0' 9 3" ROOF DECK 3/4' = 1'-0" PUDDLE WELD LOCATIONS /1 53/8' 298" 1i Verco N-24, G60 Galvanized w/Following Min. Properties SHEAR CAPACITY REQ'D = 410 5/8 18 GA. I = 4-1.223/-1.223 b ° 5 = +0.731/-0.776 111.3 Fy"40ksi PROVIDE VENTING FOR CONCRETE TOPPING WHERE OCCURS 1. MAXIMUM DECK SPAN = 12'-0" c TO c. padwl pen. refer to web welding sched. COLUMN SIZES PER SCHEDULE g ERECTION PL 318'xTx9' 1/2' -11- 1 .75Tf\ 31/2" Tsa Darla' pen. \1" return 5/16 V ` ea. end 2 DUCTILE COLUMN SPLICE 3/4' = 2. PROVIDE (2) 1/2" DIAMETER PUDDLE WELDS PER SHEET TO ALL SUPPORTS PERPENDICULAR TO DECK FLUTES. 3. PROVIDE 1/2"s PUDDLE WELDS © 12"oc TO ALL PERIMETER SUPPORTS. PROVIDE 1/2"0 PUDDLE WELDS ©12"oa WHERE DECK ORIENTATION CHANGES AND OTHER SUPPORTS PARALLEL TO DECK FLUTES. 4. CONNECT DECK SEAMS WITH 1 1/2" TSW AT 24"oc. 5. DECK TYPE MUST STRICTLY MEET CRITERIA LISTED ABOVE INCLUDING I.C.B.O. RESEARCH REPORT ALLOWABLE SHEAR LOADS. SUBMIT DECK INFORMATION TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO BEGINNING SHOP DRAWINGS. 6. REINFORCE DECK OPENINGS PER 3/55.2 Web Welding Schedule Large Column Size Weld Size 1 6x6 W1.4xW1.4 WWM —1 d A 14112' Verco W3 Formlock, G60 Coating w/Following Min. Properties PANEL WIDTH = 36" 1 3" + 3 1/2" FLOOR DECK 3/4" = 1'-0' 18 GA. I. 1.203 in. S =.767 in. 3 Fy=38ksimin. SHEAR CAPACITY REDO = 1200 VLF nn. 5/16 I .: WELD ON INSIDE OF FLANGE WHERE PLATE IS TOO SMALL N 2" Tr - 4 BASE PLATE WF -COLUMNS (4) BOLTS 3/4" = (4) 3/4 ANCHOR BOLTS Plan PROVIDE L 3x3x3116 AROUND COLUMN AS REOD. FOR DECK SUPPORT DECK ORIENTATION VARIES - SEE PLAN 3/16 V Elevation 8 FLOOR DECK SUPPORT AT COLUMNS 3/4' = 1'-0" 1. MAXIMUM DECK SPAN = 11'-0" c. TO c UNLESS SHORED AT MIDSPAN. BASED ON TRIPLE SPAN, UNSHORED CONDITIONS. 2. PROVIDE (4)112" DIAMETER EFFECTIVE PUDDLE WELDS PER SHEET TO ALL SUPPORTS PERPENDICULAR TO DECK FLUTES. COLUMN PER PLAN 3. PROVIDE 1/2' DIAMETER PUDDLE WELDS AT 12"oc TO ALL WALL LEDGERS. PROVIDE 112" DIAMETER PUDDLE WELDS ATI2'oc WHERE DECK ORIENTATION CHANGES AND OTHER SUPPORTS PARALLEL TO DECK FLUTES. 4. CONNECT DECK SEAMS WITH BUTTON PUNCHES @ 36"oc. 5. DECK TYPE MUST STRICTLY MEET CRITERIA LISTED ABOVE INCLUDING I.C.B.O. RESEARCH REPORT ALLOWABLE SHEAR LOADS. SUBMIT DECK INFORMATION TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO BEGINNING SHOP DRAWINGS. 6. REINFORCE DECK OPENINGS PER 1/S5.2 8 3/S5.2 SWERSOI SAY EAGEI • ALL RIGRIS RESERVED SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 TNN Avenue - Suite 100 -Sean, WA 98121 ph: 206.413.6212 744: 208443.4870 mwo.ownsonsavfa9eLcom 4-28-2010 DRAWN: Author DESIGN: Designer CHECKED: Checker APPROVED. Approver REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT TITLE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE: STEEL SECTIONS AND DETAILS As indicated PERMIT DATE'.04-28 2010 PROJECT NO: 1340-2009-01 SHEET N0: S5..6 OF SHEETS: 1 SECTION 1 1/2' = 1'-0" TYP 10 S5.7/ — SIDE PL 31161 \ — BASE PL Pl1/2 11 1 N L_ BM PER PLAN PL5/16 EA SIDE W/ (2) 3/4" DIA BOLTS PIPE COL PER PIAN ' 05.7 4 \ NVV 855 PER PIAN HSS PER PLAN P13/16 EA SIDE EXTERIOR PER ARCH 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 1 1/2• = 1'-0" 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 10 S5.7 r SIDEWALK PER AR01/CIVIL — — S5.7, L 1 5 SECTION G SECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" U 1 1/2" = 1--0- PIPE COL PER PLAN P15/16 EA SIDE W/ (2) 3/4" DIA BOLTS BASEPL 1/2 W/ (2) 3/4" DIAx12" ANCHOR BOLTS #4 TIES ©6" (6) #4 VERT GROUND FLOOR ;\. FTG PER PLAN • 2" 11/2' 11/2" 2" 2 1 O SECTION 3" = 1'-0" 1 1/2"— I) —I T -1/2" WF 8M PER PIAN SHAPED KNIFE P11/4 EA SIDE W/ (3) 3/4" DIA BOLTS 7 SECTION 1 1/2" = 7-0" TYP 3/16 4 SECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" CAP PL3/16 (S .7 \ 116' \ TYP 116 GRYRI- 2001 SWENSGN S. FACET ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ori SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Third Avenue - Suite 1140 - Seattle, WA 98121 58:2064436212 Ta":206 443.4810 www.swertsonsayraget DRAWN: DIN DESIGN: EBG CHECKED ABB APPROVED. ABB REVISION`. # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT TVI.E: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Centers" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 ARCHITECT Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: Amin SHEET TTTLE'. PERMIT STEEL SECTIONS AND DETAILS SCALE: As indicated PERMIT DATE. 04-28-2010 PROJECT NO: SHEET NO: S5.7 NO: OF SHEETS: tic fZO 16GAx 31 3' CLIP ANGLE W/ #10 SCREWS EA SRA 350520033 STUDS 16' OC 2 SECTION 1 1 /2' = 1'-0' HSS2X2X3/16 @ 2-0'OC MAX HSS BM PER EIEV TOP OF STEEL ,'- - PER PLAN `-r SIDING PER ARCH #8 SCREW TO SIDING ----- EA LOW FLUTE @ HSS BEAM & @ MID HT. BUG. 3 SECTION 1000520033 SNDS @ 16'ac W/ 3111 WIDTH BLKG. @ MID HT. 1155 BEAM PER PLAM (skew as recd.) 1000T20033 TRACK TOP & BOT. W/ (2) PAF. @ 16'oc 10005200-33 STUDS 16" OC CONC ON MTL DECK PER PLAN MOMENT FRAME BM PER PLAN 10001200-33 TRAIX TOP & BOT W/ (2) PAF 9 16' OC 7 SECTION 1 1/2' = 1-0" — CLOSURE AS REQD TOP OF STEEL AL PER PLAN SHTG PER ARCH MIX 18GA'Z' FURRING AS REQD 1 S5.8 / / 3' 1155 COL PER ELEV. 350520033 @ 6'ac i 2 L S5.8 / NOTE: CONFIRM ALL WALL TYPES W/960.&5VLLCO 4 SECTION 1 1 /2' = 18ga. Z RJR/11NS AS REQUIRED V y2sIr% U2' DIA BOLT CTRD. SIDING PER ARCH. I h7x3/16 /9 H55 6x6 COL 12 I/2x21/2x3/16 @ HSS 535 COL. t3x3x3/16 @ HSS 4x4 COL TYP. EA HS5 COL @ EAST & WEST EXT. AIR TOWER WALLS HSS 2x2x3/I6 @ 2-0'ac TYP. @ EAST & WEST AIR TINDER WALLS HSS BEAM PER ELEV. 350520033 @ 16' OC ) 8 SECTION 1 1 /2' = MOMENT FRAME COLUMN 600520033 @ 16' OC W/ EQUAL WIDTH BIKG @ MID HEIGHT BRACED FRAME COLUMN L PER 4/55.8 1155 PER 4/55.8 Lbl2x3/l6 W/ 312' DIA BOLT, CTR N 0 Tri SWENSON SAY FAGET A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2124 Then Avenue • Suite 102 - Seattle, WA 98121 p0: 204 441.6212 l c 206.443.4870 4-28-2010 DRAWN: Author DESIGN: Designer CHECKED: Checker APPROVED Approver REVISIONS: # DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT T11LE: IFLY - Indoor Skydiving "The Annex @ South Center" 301 Tukwila Parkway OWNER: Beta Holding LTD. 18827 Bothell Way NE bothel, WA 98011 moo ARCHITECT. Jensen Fey Architecture and Planning 7730 Leary Way NE Redmond, WA 98052 PH 425-216-0318 FX 425-216-0329 ISSUE: PERMIT SHEET TITLE: LIGHT GAUGE FRAME SECTIONS AND DETAILS N As indicated PERMIT DATE 04-28-2010 4 PROJECT NO. 1340-2009-01 4 SHEET NO: S5.8 3 NO: CHF SHEETS: