Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL10-048 - CLEARWIRE / SOUTHGATE PARK - W-SEA25 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONSCLEARWIRE SOUTHGATE PARK 13134 44T" AVE S PLI 0-048 L10-057 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS City Tukwila Department of Community Development • Ji,n Haggerton, Mayor NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Jennifer Taylor, Applicant Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership, Owner Jock Puce, Director September 17, 2010 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L10-057 Applicant: Jennifer Taylor on behalf of RealCom Associates Type of Permit Applied for: Type 1 Wireless Communications Facility Permit Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a Type 1 Wireless Communications Facility Permit to install one (1) panel antenna on an existing monopole. Location: 13130 44th Avenue South APN: 7349200345 Associated File: L05-078, WCF permit for the tower on site. L09-044, WCF permit to replace three (3) antennas. Zoning: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) H. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Type 1 Wireless Communications Facility Permit complies with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 1 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. CT Page 1 of 2 09/16/2010 W:\Users\Courtney\L Files\L10-057 WCF Type 1\2010_09_17_NOD.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukti>>ila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 1111) A party who is not satisfied with the oome of the administrative appeal process file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. - _ :72:- _ IV. PROCEDURES=AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, which is by October 1, 2010. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee of $515 plus additional fees if review time exceeds 5 hours. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VL INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Courtney Thomson, who may be contacted at (206) 431-2164 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period if no appeal is filed. -414 Department of Community Development City of Tukwila CT Page 2 of 2 W:\Users\Courtney\L Files \L10-057 WCF Type 1\2010_09_17_NOD.doc 09/16/2010 STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR PREPARED September 16, 2010 NOTIFICATION: Public Notice is not required for a Type 1 application. FILE NUMBER: L10-057 APPLICANT: Jennifer Taylor of RealCom Associates on behalf of Clearwire PROPERTY OWNER: Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership REQUEST: Approval of a Type 1 Wireless Communications Facility Permit to install one (1) panel antenna on an existing monopole. LOCATION: ASSOCIATED PERMITS: 13130 44th Avenue South, APN: 7349200345 L05-078, WCF permit for the tower on site. L09-044, WCF permit to replace three (3) antennas. SEPA DETERMINATION: Exempt COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) ZONE DESIGNATION: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) STAFF: Courtney Thomson, Planning Intern ATTACHMENTS: Construction Plans dated July 6, 2010 CT Page 1 of 4 09/16/2010 W:\Users\Courtney\L Files\L10-057 WCF Type 1\2010_09_16_SR.doc • • FINDINGS Vicinity/Site Information Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a Type 1 Wireless Facilities Permit to install one (1) additional panel antenna to an existing 120 -foot tower. The proposal does not increase the height of the existing tower or the size of the enclosure area. Existing Development: There is an existing 120 -foot tall wireless communication monopole on the site along with a 432 square foot equipment building on the site. The existing facility was originally approved in 1991 (91 -3 -CUP). The Planning Commission approved additional antennas for this location in 2000 (L2000-050), 2005 (L05-045 and L05-078), and 2009 (L09-044). Surrounding Land Uses: The property and all immediately surrounding properties are zoned Commercial/Light Industrial. The surrounding land use in the area is predominately industrial warehouses; however, there are some single family residences west of the property. State Route 599 interchanges border the site to the northeast. Location Selection Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) provides a hierarchy of appropriate locations within the City. Generally, co - locations and utilizing existing structures are favored over the development of new standalone WCF within the City. The applicant is proposing to attach additional antennas on an existing structure in a non-residential zone. General Requirements (TMC 18.58.070) The City provides general design standards for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. The following are the general design standards for all WCF within the City: Table 1 General Design Project Project does Not Applicable Notes: Standards does comply not comply 1. Generators must comply with TMC 8.22 regarding noise. X The applicant has not proposed a generator. 2.Business License Requirement X Clearwire has applied for a business license for this location. 3. Only safety signage must be placed on the WCF X No signs will be on site unless required by either the FCC or the FAA. 4. Accommodations for parking for maintenance personnel must be provided. X Existing on-site parking provides adequate parking for the existing facility. 5. Towers shall maintain a galvanized steel finish. X No changes have been proposed to the finish of the tower. CT Page 2 of 4 W:\Users\Courtney\I. Files\L10-057 WCF Type I\2010_09_16_SR.doc 09/16/2010 6. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities to the natural setting and built environment. Project Project does X No new buildings or ancillary structures have been proposed and no changes have been proposed for the existing buildings or ancillary structures. 7. Antennas shall have the same color scheme as the structure they are located on. X not comply Antennas and associated mounting hardware will be painted to match the monopole. 8. WCF poles and towers shall only have safety lights if required by a government agency. X No tower lighting will be on site unless required by either the FCC or the FAA. 9. No advertising is permitted on WCF X No advertising will be on site. 10. Each service provider shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet. X The existing enclosure area will not be increased. Adding Antennas to Existing WCF Tower -Specific Development Standards (18.58.090) Table 2 Design Standards Project Project does Not Applicable Notes: does comply not comply 1. The height must not exceed what was approved under the original application to construct the tower, or it will be considered a Type 2 decision. X The applicant is not proposing to add height to the tower. 2. Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the tower. X The antennas will be painted to match the monopole. 3. There is no limit on the number of antennas that may be located on an existing tower. X 4. Feed lines and cables shall be located within the tower, or shall be painted to match the tower. X The feed lines, coaxial cable, and associated mounting hardware will be painted to match the monopole. CT Page 3 of 4 W:\Users\Courtney\L Files\L10-057 WCF Type 1\2010_09_16_SR.doc 09/16/2010 5. A new cabinet shall be located within the equipment enclosure that was approved as X No new equipment is proposed and no changes to the existing equipment enclosure have been proposed. part of the original application, or it will require a Type 2 decision. 6. Setbacks shall not X apply when an applicant installs new antennas on an existing tower and uses an existing equipment enclosure. If the equipment enclosure is increased, it must meet setbacks. CONCLUSIONS 1. As demonstrated in Tables 1 and 2 the project meets all applicable development standards for a Type 1 WCF. 2. No noise will be generated from the new antennas, and the applicant is not proposing to install a generator. 3. The proposed project is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. 4. Clearwire has applied for a business license for this specific location as required by TMC 18.58.070 (2). The purpose of the business license requirement is so that City staff has contact information for the actual entity utilizing the WCF. DECISION Staff recommends approval of a Type 1 WCF with no conditions. CT Page 4 of 4 09/16/2010 W:\Users\Courtney\. Files\L10-057 WCF Type 1\2010_09_16_SR.doc TO: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L10-057 PL10-048 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning 10 Public Works yfFire Dept. ❑l Police Dept. l❑] Parks/Rec Project:Clearwire Southgate Park Address: 13130 44th Ave S Date 8-19-2010 transmitted: Response requested by: 9-2-10 Staff Courtney Thomson coordinator: Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Addition of one new panel antenna to an existing monopole. X/O tom+ a -I- -N. r? tiv,c_ Plan check date: 9 ^i Y - ( j Comments A--)ii prepared by: s7J Update date: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RECEIVES° AUG 19 YUW TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number L10-057 PL10-048 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: 101 Building ❑ Planning Public Works 101 Fire Dept. ri Police Dept. I❑' Parks/Rec Project:Clearwire Southgate Park 0 J1011oWL0 Address: 13130 44th Ave S Date 8-19-2010 transmitted: Response requested by: 9-2-10 Staff Courtney Thomson coordinator: Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Addition of one new panel antenna to an existing monopole. h.Qr) rn,o corn/ Plan check date: 0 J1011oWL0 Comments Update date: prepared by:.\Valim(� SIS-wr • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L10-057 PL10-048 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: KBuilding ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works 01 Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. 01 Parks/Rec Project:Clearwire Southgate Park Comments Address: 13130 44th Ave S 91//,/Q Date 8-19-2010 transmitted: Response requested by: 9-2-10 Staff Courtney Thomson coordinator: Date response received: S _ 2 LI - 1 Q REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Addition of one new panel antenna to an existing monopole. jt/o ?,L/Q, (e,(-* Plan check dat,` Comments Update date: 91//,/Q prepared b • • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerlon, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION August 19, 2010 Ms. Jennifer Taylor RealCom Associates 14432 SE Eastgate Way Suite #260 Bellevue, WA 98007 Subject: Wireless Tele-Communications Facility Permit (L10-057), 13130 44th Avenue South Clearwire — WA-SEA255S 10.2 ATC Southgate Park Dear Ms. Taylor: Your application for a Wireless Tele-Communications Facility Permit is considered complete on August 19, 2010 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 431-2164. Sincerely, C)A-1AAA TivykA-6--N Courtney Thomson Planning Intern cc. L10-057 CT Page 1 of 1 W:\Users\Courtney\L Files\L10-057 WCF Type 1\2010_08_19_complete.doc 08/19/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard! Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431•-3665- -- E-mail: tukplanOci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly swom and upon oath states as follows: 1. I sin the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. 8S bnowiedsoien�on Wireless is frofer15 stoner, ev -c Ret prepare -The o p6'ett/Otc) 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at OS 134 (0{Ih he(5) (f't bettgo (R '&8 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. r� EXECUTED at l (Q Jt '' (city), 04- (state), on Oa Ci * , 20 Oq Mak W hu (Prim Name) )000 �(_. 4+6 IVO (Address) / ) „ c//v (Phone Number)im K11n 7.P7 M z:q,(ffelleili46,0 (Signature) On this day personally appeared before nuc Mark riu (JS to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that jr e signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBS cluvimmegr NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 29, 2011 RE ME ON THIS DAY OF [� IV' NOTARY PUBLIC and for the S 1:4 of Washington ,20 dt residing at &lie-1)0.12 My Commission expires on 0 gfaq(0(/ • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION RECEIVED AUG i. A 20101 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION Clearwire is a wireless internet. provider operating throughout. the United Stages of America. Clearwire is licensed to operate in the United States by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Clearwire is currently upgrading its network in the King County area to make available improved wireless internet services to its subscribers. It. is Clealwire's desire to work with the City of Tukwila to ensure that this project is consistent with local ordinances and zoning regulations wlulc providing wireless internet to Clearwire's customers. Project Goals The goal of the Clearwire WA-SEA2.55 ATC Southgate Park is to provide wireless internet services to its subscribers. Clearwire intends to achieve these network goals consistent with all policies and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. Application Request Plan The applicant is requesting the following: • type 1 Land Use Review GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Overview The applicant., Clearwire, proposes to modify an existing approved telecommunication facility (approved under Permit No. LOS -078) on an existing monopole at. 13130 44th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington (Parcel Number 7349200345). The proposed modification consists of the Following: add one (1) antenna. (Please see Sheet. A-1 and A-3 for additional information.) Facility Specifications ■ Antennas - Clearwire is proposing to add one (1) panel antenna. Please see Sheet A-2 and A-3 for additional information. ■ Facility Maintenance - The facility is generally serviced once a month. One (1) to two (2) employees are on site for an average of loin (4.) hours of maintenance checks. This check is typically for preventive maintenance purposes. In the event of a problem, a crew is dispatched to the site immediately. C/eanrire VVASIA25,VIS/0.2ATC Southgate Park Page / • • GENERAL SITE ANALYSIS Zoning General Plan Designation The site is zoned Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI). Clearwire's proposed telecommunication facility modification requires a "Type 1 Land Use Review according to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.58.050: A. Applications will be reviewed based 011 the type of wireless communication lacilities requested to be permitted. Etch wireless communication lacility requires the appropriate type of project permit review, as shown in "Table A: TABLE A Type of Permit Required, Based on Type of Wireless Communication Facility Zoning(1) Type of Facility Residential Commercial Industrial Transmission tower co -location Type 1 Type 1 Type 1 Adding antennas to an existing tower Type 1(2) Type 1 tzt Type 1(2) Utility pole co -location Type 2 Type 2 Type 2 Concealed building attached Type 2() Type 20) Type 1 Non -concealed building attached Type 2 Type 2 Type 1 New tower or waiver request Type 4 Type 4 Type 4 (1) Zoning for any private/public property or right- of-way: Residential — LDR, MDR, or HDR. Commercial — 0, MUO, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC, C/ LI or TVS. Industrial — LI, Hl, MIC/L, or MIC/H. (2) Provided the height of the tower does not increase and the square footage of the enclosure area does not increase. (3) An applicant may request to install a non - concealed building attached facility, under TMC Section 18.58.150. Cleat -wire is adding an antenna to an existing tower. Clearwire is not proposing to add height to the tower and there is no proposed increase in size of the enclosure area. Accordingly, Clearwire is requesting the review and approval of a Type 1 Land Use Review. Noise According to TMC 18.58.070: 1. Noise - Any facility that requires a generator or other device which 1611 create noise must demonstrate compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". A noise report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted with any application to construct and operate a wireless communication facility that will have a generator or similar device. The City may require that the report be reviewed by a third party expert at the expense of the applicant. Cleanrife ITA-SI:A25.5.5.5/0.2ATC .Southgate Park Page 2 • • Clcarwirc's equipment. will meet. all applicable noise standards. No additional equipment and/or generators are proposed. Business License Requirement According to TMC 18.58.070: 2. 13usiness License requirement - Any person, corporation or entity that operates a wireless communication facility within the City shall have a valid business license issued annually by the City. Any person, corporation or other business entity which owns a lower also is required to obtain a business license on an annual basis. Cleatwire has applied for a business license for this site location. Signage According to TMC 18.58.070: 3. Signage - Only safety signs or those mandated by other government entities may be located on wireless communication facilities. No other types of signs are permitted on wireless communication facilities. No signs will be on-site unless required by either the FCC and/or FAA. Parking According to TMC 18.58.070: 4. Puling - Any application must demonstrate that there is sufficient space for teu)poruy parking for regular maintenance of the proposed facility. Existing on-site parking provides adequate parking for the existing facility. Finish According to TMC 18.58.070: .5. hmtsl! - A tower stall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or, subject to any applicable standards of the FAA or FCC, be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness. The antenna, feed lines, coaxial cables, and associated Mounting hardware will be painted to match the monopole to blend with the surrounding environment. Design According to TMC 18.58.070: 6. Design - "F1ie designs of all buildings and auicillaiy structures shall use materials, colors, lectures, screening and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities with the natural setting and built environment. Clcarnire WA-SEA2. 5.5510.2A C.Southgate Park Page 3 • • The antenna, feed lines, coaxial cables, and associated mounting hardware will be painted to match the monopole to blend with the surrounding environment. Color According to TMC 18.58.070: 7. Color - All i'utenuas and ancillary lacililics located on buildings or structures other than towers shall be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color of the supporting structure so as to make the ;mtcnna and ancillary facilities as visually unobtrusive as possible. The antenna and associated mounting Hardware will be painted to match the monopole to blend with the surrounding environment. Lighting According to TMC 18.58.070: 8. Lighting - Towers shall 1101 be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA, FCC or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the reviewing authority shall review the lighting alternatives and approve the designs that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding areas. No strobe lighting of any type is permitted on any tower. No tower lighting will be on-site unless required by either the FCC and/or FAA. Advertising According to TMC 18.58.070: 9. Advertising- No advertising is permitted at wireless communication lacilily sites or on any ancill.uy structure or facilities equipment compound. No advertising is or will be on-site. Equipment Enclosure According to TMC 18.58.070: 10. Lquipmeii! Lix%sure - Each applicant shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet at each site. However, this restriction shall not apply to enclosures located within an existing commercial, industrial, residential or institutional building. No additional equipment or generators or expansion of equipment enclosure is proposed. Height According to TMC 18.58.090: 1. Height - The height must not exceed what was approved under the original application to construct the tower. If the height shall exceed what was originally approved, approval as a 'Type 2 decision is required for any height which will be less than the maximum height of the zone. C/eaiwii c WA-.SLA2 55SI0.2A TCSoulhgaie Park Page 4 • • Clearwire is adding one antenna to the existing tower. Cleanvirc is not adding height to the tower. Antenna Aesthetics According to TMC 18.58.090: 2. Antenna aesthetics - Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the lower. The antenna, feed lines, coaxial cables, and associated mounting hardware will be painted to match the monopole to blend with the surrounding environment. Feed Lines and Coaxial Cables According to TMC 18.58.090: 3. Feed lines and coaxial cables - Feed lines and coaxial cables shall be located within the tower. Any exposed feed Tines or coaxial cables (such as when extended out of the tower to connect 10 the antennas) must be punted to match the tower. The antenna, feed lines, coaxial cables, and associated mounting hardware will be painted to match the monopole to blend with the surrounding environment. Cabinet Equipment According to TMC 18.58.090: 4. Cabinet equipment - A new cabinet shall be located within the equipment enclosure that was approved as part of the original application. If the applicant wishes 10 expand the equipment enclosure lrom what was approved by the City or County under the previous application, the applicant shall seek a wireless communication facility (Type 2) application for only the equipment enclosure increase. No additional cabinets or generators arc proposed. No changes are proposed to the existing equipment enclosure. Setbacks According to TMC 18.58.090: 5. Setbacks - Setbacks shall not apply when an applicant installs new antennas on an existing tower and uses an existing equipment enclosure. I1 the equipment enclosure is increased, it must meet setbacks. No additional equipment and/or generators arc proposed. There are no proposed changes to the existing equipment enclosure. Therefore, the proposed antennas do not need to meet setbacks. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) According to Revised Cole of Washington (RCW) 43.21C.0384: Cle annT ii -c 41lA-SEA255.5.5702A1 CSouthgate Yank Page 5 • • Application of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) to personal wireless services facilities. (1) Decisions pertaining to applications to site personal wireless service facilities are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), it those facilities meet the following requirements: (a)(i) The facility to be sited is a microccll and is to be attached to an existing structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school; or (ii) the facility includes personal wireless service antennas, other than a microcell, and is to be attached to an existing structure (that may be an existing tower) that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school, and the existing structure to which it is to be attached is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone; or (iii) the siting project involves constructing a personal wireless service tower Icss than sixty feet in height that is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone; and (b) "Fhc project is not in a designated environmentally sensitive arca; and (c) The project docs not consist of a series of actions: (i) Some of which are not categorically exempt; or (ii) that together may have a probable significant adverse environmental impact. (2) 'l'Ihc department of ecology shall adopt rules to create a categorical exemption for microcells and other personal wireless service facilities that meet the conditions set forth in subsection (1) of this section... "Microcell" means a sinless communication facility consisting of an antenna that is either: (i) Four feet in height and with aun area of not more than five hundred eighty square inches; or (ii) if a tubular antenna, no more than four inches in diameter and no more than six feet in length. The proposed Clcanvirc telecommunication facility mollification is exempt from SEPA because the facility in located in a commercial land -use zone an(1 is to be attached to an existing structure that is not a residence or school and sloes not contain a residence or a school. Existing Use The subject arca accommodates an existing telecommunication facility. Access/Circulation '1'Ihc site will be accessed by the existing right of entry. There are no traffic impacts associated with these types of facilities as they are unmanned and require infrequent maintenance. Federal Requirements Clearwire's proposed telecommunication facility modification will meet or exceed current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other agency of the Federal government with the authority to regulate towers and antennas. Clcarwirc's site will conform to all FAA/FCC regulations, and because the maximum ERP is less than two thousand (2,000) watts and/or the height of the facility is greater than ten meters (10m), an environmental evaluation of radio frequency emissions is exempted per CFR Title 47 Part 24, Subpart E. Clearwirc has a license from the FCC to provide wireless services in the Puget. Sound region. Clean rc WA-SK2..5.55510.1ATC Southgate Pik Parc 6 • MEM rrw OF KWI1 A AUG 16 200 PERMIT CENTER CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us • WIRELESS TELE- COMMUNICATION FACILITIES NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Clearwire WA SEA255S10.2 ATC Southgate Park LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1313'F 0131.30 -44th Avenue South LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 7349200345 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: ? has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, ? has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and ? is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: RealCom Associates - Jennifer Taylor Address: 14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 260 Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone: (425) 274-4444 ext. 141 FAX: (425) 274-4449 E-mail: jtaylrrealcomassoccom Signature: Date: W I I c 1 1 c3 APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P-WCF Planner: Cu,Il Thomson omson File Number: 1) 0 `- 0 -- 7 Application Complete (Date: 8-161- 10 ) Project File Number: 7L/0 - (Ye lJ Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Clearwire WA SEA255S10.2 ATC Southgate Park LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1313'F 0131.30 -44th Avenue South LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 7349200345 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: ? has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, ? has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and ? is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: RealCom Associates - Jennifer Taylor Address: 14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 260 Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone: (425) 274-4444 ext. 141 FAX: (425) 274-4449 E-mail: jtaylrrealcomassoccom Signature: Date: W I I c 1 1 c3 RIVED AuS • COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: Items 1-9 are required for ALL Wireless Telecommunication Facilities. x 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. x 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). X 3. Four sets of plans prepared by a design professional. The plans shall include a vicinity map, site map, architectural elevations, method of attachment, proposed screening, location of proposed antennas, and all other information which accurately depicts the proposed project. Minimum size is 8.5" by 11". Plans shall be no greater than 24" x 36". x 4. Application Fee: See attached Land Use Fee Schedule. X 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). N/A 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist. SEPA is not required when the facility: i) Is a microshell and is to be attached to an exiting structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school; ii) Includes personal wireless antennas, other than a microcell, and is to be attached to an existing structure (that may be an existing tower) that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school, and the existing structure to which it is to be attached is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest or agriculture zone; or iii) Involves constructing a personal wireless tower less than sixty feet in height that is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone. X 7. A letter from the applicant describing the proposed project and describing compliance with the City's Code requirements. N/A 8. Sensitive Area studies and proposed mitigation (if required). N/A 9: If an outdoor generator is proposed, a report prepared by an acoustical engineer demonstrating compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". If the application requires a Type II review these additional items are needed: 10. Four sets of photo simulations that depict the existing and proposed view of the proposed facility; 11. Materials board for the screening material; 12. Landscaping plan; 13. Letter from a radio frequency engineer that demonstrates that the facility meets Federal requirements for allowed emissions; 14. If the facility is located within a residential zone, a report from a radio frequency engineer explaining the need for the proposed wireless communication facility at that location. Additionally, the applicant shall provide detailed discussion on why the wireless communication facility cannot be located within a commercial or industrial zone. If the application requires a Type IV review these additional items are needed: 15. A narrative responding to the criteria at TMC Section 18.58.060. 16. The radio frequency engineer report shall include a discussion of the information required under TMC Section 18.58.070. The report shall also explain why a tower must be used instead of any of the other location options outlined in Table A. 17. Engineering Plans for the proposed tower. 18. A vicinity map depicting the proposed extent of the service area. 19. A graphic simulation showing the appearance of the proposed tower and ancillary structures and ancillary facilities from five points within the impacted vicinity. Such points are to be mutually agreed upon by the Director of DCD and applicant. All plans and photo simulations shall include the maximum build -out of the proposed facility. 20. Evidence of compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for height and lighting and certificates of compliance from all affected agencies. 21. Evidence that the tower has been designed to meet the minimum structural standards for wireless communication facilities for a minimum of three providers of voice, video or data transmission services, including the applicant, and including a description of the number and types of antennas the tower can accommodate. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 22. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 23. Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple -family buildings—e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks—must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). Or See attached Land Use Fee Schedule for City of Tukwila to provide labels 24. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. RECEIVED 'L%J it 2 fli COMMUNITi ®EVELOPNiiEPJT A AMERICAN TOWER® CORPORATION Structural Analysis Report Structure : 120 ft Valmont Monopole ATC Site Name : Riverton, WA ATC Site Number : 83050 Proposed Carrier : Clearwire Carrier Site Name : ATC Southgate Park Carrier Site Number : WA-SEA255 County : King Eng. Number : 45378322 Date : July 29, 2010* Usage : 59% Portholes Required : No Submitted by: Scott Wirgau, PE Project Engineer American Tower Engineering Services 400 Regency Forest Drive Cary, NC 27518 Phone: 919-468-0112 ��o Eng. Number 45378322 July 29, 2010 Page 1 Introduction The purpose of this report is to summarize results of the structural analysis performed on the 120 ft Valmont Monopole located at 13134 44th Avenue S., Seattle, WA 98168, King County (ATC site #83050). The tower was originally designed and manufactured by Valmont (Alpha Tower Design Project #910088, dated November 25, 1991). Tower foundation information was also taken from the Alpha Tower Design project and geotechnical information was taken from a report by RZA (job #W-7687, dated July 8, 1991). Analysis The tower was analyzed using Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc., Software. The analysis assumes that the tower is in good, undamaged, and non -corroded condition. Basic Wind Speed: 85 mph (3 -Second Gust) Radial Ice: 50 mph (3 -Second Gust) w/ 1" ice Code: TIA-222-G / 2009 International Building Code Antenna Loads The following antenna loads were used in the tower analysis. Existing Antennas Elev. (ft) Qty Antennas Mount Coax Carrier 120.0 6 Antel LPA-185090/8CF T -Arm (6) 1 5/8" Verizon 3 Antel BXA-80090/8CF (3) 1 5/8" 6 Clearcom CCDP-565-1 W 1 2' Omni (2) 1 5/8" 1 GPS Unit _J1) 7/8" 3 Antel BXA-70063/8CF (3) 1 5/8" 105.0 4 Huawei RRU3702 Side Arm - Clearwire 3 Kathrein 840 10054 (9) 5/16" 1 Trimble Acutime 2000 (1) 5/16" 57.0 4 Decibel DB844H65E-XY T -Arm (5) 1 5/8" Sprint Nextel 30.0 6 14" x 9" TMA T -Arm - 9 Decibel DB844G45AXY (9) 1 5/8" 3 72" x 12" Panel (3) 1 5/8" Eng. Number 45378322 July 29, 2010 Page 2 Proposed Antennas Elev. () Qty Antennas Mount Coax Carrier 105.0 2 Andrew PX2F-52 Side Arm (2) 1/2" Clearwire 1 Kathrein 840 10054 (3) 5/16" Install proposed coax inside monopole. Results The maximum structure usage is: 59% Additional exit and/or entry ports may be required to accommodate the running of the proposed lines to the proposed antennas. These additional ports may not be installed without installation drawings providing the location, size and welding requirements of each port. To ensure compliance with all conditions of this structural analysis, port installation drawings shall be provided by American Tower's Engineering Department under a subsequent project. Pole Reactions Original Design Reactions Design Reactions x1.35* Current Analysis Reactions % Of Design Moment (ft -kips) 1222.0 1649.7 1019.5 62 Shear (kips) 17.5 23.6 14.0 59 *The original design reactions have been multiplied by 1.35 per TIA-222-G, Section 15.5.1 The structure base reactions resulting from this analysis were found to be acceptable through analysis based on geotechnical and foundation information, therefore no modification or reinforcement of the foundation will be required. Elevation (ft) Twist* (Degrees) Sway* (Degrees) 105.0 0.00 1.46 *Values from analysis per TIA-222-G standards with a basic wind speed of 60 mph. Conclusion Based on the analysis results, the structure meets the requirements per TIA-222-G and 2009 IBC standards. The tower and foundation can support the existing and proposed antennas with the TX line distribution as described in this report. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call 919-466-5086. Standard Conditions All engineering services are performed on the basis that the information used is current and correct. This information may consist of, but is not necessary limited, to: Information supplied by the client regarding the structure itself, the antenna and feed line loading on the structure and its components, or other relevant information. Information from drawings in the possession of American Tower Corporation, or generated by field inspections or measurements of the structure. It is the responsibility of the client to ensure that the information provided to ATC Engineering Services and used in the performance of our engineering services is correct and complete. In the absence of information to the contrary, we assume that all structures were constructed in accordance with the drawings and specifications and are in an un -corroded condition and have not deteriorated; and we, therefore, assume that their capacity has not significantly changed from the "as new" condition. All services will be performed to the codes specified by the client, and we do not imply to meet any other codes or requirements unless explicitly agreed in writing. If wind and ice loads or other relevant parameters are to be different from the minimum values recommended by the codes, the client shall specify the exact requirement. In the absence of information to the contrary, all work will be performed in accordance with the latest relevant revision of ANSI/EIA-222. All services are performed, results obtained, and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. ATC Engineering Services is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions and recommendations made by others based on the information we supply. Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc 120'-0" 85-0" 40'-0" 105'-0" co 57'-0" [__[ 30'-0" 0 0 0 35-0" 1/4" Thick (65 KSI) 45'-0" 9/32" Thick (65 KSI) 12 v 40'-0" 5/ 16" Thick (65 KSI) Job Information Pole : 83050 Description : 120' Monopole Client: Clearwire Location : Riverton, WA Shape : 12 Sides Height : 120.00 (ft) Code: ANSI/TIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : II Exposure : B Topo : 1 Base Bev (ft): 0.00 Taper: 0.180000(in/ft) Sections Properties Diameter (in) Overlap Steel Shaft Length Accross Flats Thick Joint Length Taper Grade Section (tt) Top Bottom (in) Type (in) (in/ft) (ksi) 1 40.000 29.10 36.30 0.313 0.000 0.180000 65 2 45.000 21.00 29.10 0.281 Butt Joint 0.000 0.180000 65 3 35.000 14.70 21.00 0.250 Butt Joint 0.000 0.180000 65 Discrete Appurtenance Attach Force Bev (ft) Bev (ft) Qty Description 120.000 120.000 3 Round T -Arm 120.000 120.000 6 Antel LPA-185090/8CF 120.000 120.000 3 Antel BXA-80090/8CF 120.000 120.000 6 Clearcom CCDP-565-1W 120.000 120.000 1 2' Omni 120.000 120.000 1 GPS Unit 120.000 120.000 3 Antel BXA-70063/8CF 105.000 105.000 2 Andrew PX2F-52 105.000 105.000 1 Kathrein 840 10054 105.000 105.000 4 HuaweiRRU3702 105.000 105.000 3 Kathrein 840 10054 105.000 105.000 3 Round Side Arm 105.000 105.000 1 Trimble Acutime 2000 57.000 57.000 1 Round T -Arm 57.000 57.000 4 Decibel DB844H65E-XY 30.000 30.000 3 Round T -Arm 30.000 30.000 6 14" x 9" TMA 30.000 30.000 9 Decibel DB844G45AXY 30.000 30.000 3 72" x 12" Panel Linear Appurtenance Bev (ft) Exposed From To Description To Wind 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 30.000 57.000 105.0 105.0 120.0 120.0 1 5/8" Coax 1 5/8" Coax 1/2" Coax 5/16" Coax 1 5/8" Coax 7/8" Coax Yes Yes No No No No Load Cases 1.2D + 1.6W 0.9D + 1.6W 1.2D + 1.0Di + 1.0Wi 1.2D + 1.0E 0.9D + 1.0E 1.0D + 1.0W 85.00 mph with No Ice 85.00 mph with No Ice (Reduced DL) 50.00 mph with 1.00 in Radial Ice Dead Load with Seismic Dead Load with Seismic (Reduced DL) 60.00 mph Serviceability Reactions Load Case Moment Shear Axial (Kip -ft) (Kips) (Kips) 1.2D + 1.6W 0.9D + 1.6W 1.2D + 1.0Di + 1.0Wi 1019.54 1010.92 327.48 14.03 14.02 4.19 17.63 13.21 37.82 35'-0" 1/4" Thick (65 KSI) 45'-0" 9/32" Thick (65 KSI) 120'-0" v 40 0" 5/ 16" Thick (65 KSI) 1.2D + 1.0E 0.9D + 1.0E 1.0D + 1.0W 625.89 620.82 315.95 8.33 8.32 4.37 17.64 13.23 14.71 Dish Deflections Load Case Attach Deflection Rotation Bev (ft) (in) (deg) 1.0D + 1.0W 105.00 16.694 1.460 Elevation (ft) Load Case : 1.2D + 1.6W Max Ratio 59.12% at 0.0ft 120.000 115.000 110.000 105.000 100.000 95.000 90.000 85.000 80.000 75.000 70.000 65.000 60.000 55.000 50.000 45.000 40.000 35.000 30.000 25.000 20.000 15.000 10.000 5.000 0.000 0.00 0.24 0.28 0. 0.31 1.00 0.44 0.47 0.43 0.49 0.49 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.57 0.59 0.02 0.12 0.22 0.32 0.42 0.52 0.62 0.72 0.82 0.92 Interaction 1.00 Pole : Location : Height : Shape : Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSUTIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : I1 Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/2010 1:37:26 PA Page: 1 X Shaft Section Properties Slip Sect Length Thick Fv Joint Joint Weight Num (ft) (in) (ksi) Type Len (in) (Ib) 1 40.000 0.3125 65 0.00 2 45.000 0.2813 65 ButtJoint 0.00 3 35.000 0.2500 65 ButtJoint 0.00 Shaft Weight 4,436 3,435 1,687 9,558 Discrete Appurtenance Properties Attach Elev (ft) Description 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 57.00 57.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Round T -Arm Ante/ LPA-185090/8CF Antel BXA-80090/8CF Clearcom CCDP-565-1 W 2' Omni GPS Unit Antel BXA-70063/8CF Andrew PX2F 52 Kathrein 840 10054 Huawei RRU3702 Kathrein 840 10054 Round Side Arm Trimble Acutime 2000 Round T -Arm Decibel DB844H65E-XY Round T -Arm 14" x 9" TMA Decibel DB844G45AXY 72" x 12" Panel Bottom Dia Bev Area Ix W/t Dlt (in) (ft) (sqin) (in"4) Ratio Ratio 36.30 0.000 36.21 5986.1 28.98 116.1 29.10 40.00 26.10 2766.6 25.58 103.4 21.00 85.00 16.70 918.0 20.36 84.00 Top Dia Bev Area Ix W/t Dlt Taper (in) (ft) (sqin) (inA4) Ratio Ratio (in/ft) 29.10 40.00 28.97 3064.1 22.81 93.12 0.18000 21.00 85.00 18.76 1028.0 17.86 74.67 0.18000 14.70 120.0 11.63 310.0 13.61 58.80 0.18000 No Ice Ice Distance Weight CaAa CaAa Weight CaAa CaAa From Face Qty (Ib) (sf) Factor (Ib) (sf) Factor (ft) 3 250.00 9.700 0.67 0.00 0.000 0.67 0.000 6 7.00 2.790 0.88 0.00 0.000 0.88 0.000 3 23.00 8.290 0.89 0.00 0.000 0.89 0.000 6 7.00 0.450 0.67 0.00 0.000 0.67 0.000 1 5.00 0.300 1.00 0.00 0.000 1.00 0.000 1 10.00 1.000 1.00 0.00 0.000 1.00 0.000 3 24.00 10.670 0.78 0.00 0.000 0.78 0.000 2 14.00 5.230 1.00 0.00 0.000 1.00 0.000 1 35.00 5.180 0.63 0.00 0.000 0.63 0.000 4 44.00 2.570 0.67 0.00 0.000 0.67 0.000 3 35.00 5.180 0.63 0.00 0.000 0.63 0.000 3 150.00 5.200 0.67 0.00 0.000 0.67 0.000 1 1.30 0.300 1.00 0.00 0.000 1.00 0.000 1 250.00 9.700 1.00 0.00 0.000 1.00 0.000 4 20.00 9.570 1.00 0.00 0.000 1.00 0.000 3 250.00 9.700 0.67 0.00 0.000 0.67 0.000 6 10.00 1.230 0.67 0.00 0.000 0.67 0.000 9 21.00 7.000 0.78 0.00 0.000 0.78 0.000 3 45.00 8.400 0.75 0.00 0.000 0.75 0.000 Vert Ecc (ft) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Totals 63 3249.30 5267.54 Number of Loadings : 19 Linear Appurtenance Properties Elev From (ft) Elev To (tt) Description Exposed Width Exposed (in) To Wind 5.00 120.00 (14)1 5/8" Coax 5.00 120.00 (1) 7/8" Coax 5.00 105.00 (2) 1/2" Coax 5.00 105.00 (13) 5/16" Coax 5.00 57.00 (5) 1 5/8" Coax 5.00 30.00 (12) 1 5/8" Coax 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N N N N Y Y Pole : Location : Height : Shape : Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSUTIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : II Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/2912010 1:37:26 PA Page: 2 X Segment Properties Seg Top Elev (ft) Description (Max Len : 5 ft) Thick (in) Flat Dia Area (in) (in^2) Ix (in"4) W/t D/t Py S Ratio Ratio (ksi) (in3) Weight (Ib) 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 57.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.0 105.0 110.0 115.0 120.0 Top - Section 1 Bot - Section 2 Top - Section 2 Bot - Section 3 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2813 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500 36.300 35.400 34.500 33.600 32.700 31.800 30.900 30.000 29.100 29.100 28.200 27.300 26.400 26.040 25.500 24.600 23.700 22.800 21.900 21.000 21.000 20.100 19.200 18.300 17.400 16.500 15.600 14.700 36.212 35.307 34.401 33.495 32.590 31.684 30.779 29.873 28.967 26.099 25.284 24.469 23.654 23.328 22.839 22.024 21.209 20.393 19.578 18.763 16.704 15.979 15.255 14.530 13.806 13.081 12.357 11.632 5,986.1 5,548.1 5,132.0 4,737.3 4,363.4 4,009.6 3,675.5 3,360.5 3,064.1 2.766.7 2,515.5 2,279.9 2,059.6 1,975.6 1,854.0 1,662.5 1.484.6 1,320.0 1,167.9 1,028.1 918.0 803.6 699.2 604.2 518.3 440.9 371.6 310.0 28.98 28.21 27.44 26.67 25.89 25.12 24.35 23.58 22.81 25.58 24.72 23.87 23.01 22.66 22.15 21.29 20.44 19.58 18.72 17.86 20.36 19.40 18.43 17.47 16.51 15.54 14.58 13.61 116.16 113.28 110.40 107.52 104.64 101.76 98.88 96.00 93.12 103.47 100.27 97.07 93.87 92.59 90.67 87.47 84.27 81.07 77.87 74.67 84.00 80.40 76.80 73.20 69.60 66.00 62.40 58.80 73.1 73.9 74.8 75.6 76.5 77.3 78.2 79.0 79.8 76.8 77.8 78.7 79.6 80.0 80.6 81.5 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 81.9 318.6 302.8 287.4 272.4 257.8 243.6 229.8 216.4 203.4 183.7 172.3 161.3 150.7 146.6 140.5 130.6 121.0 111.8 103.0 94.6 84.4 77.2 70.4 63.8 57.5 51.6 46.0 40.7 0.0 608.4 593.0 577.6 562.2 546.8 531.4 516.0 500.6 437.1 423.2 409.4 159.9 235.6 381.6 367.8 353.9 340.0 326.2 278.0 265.7 253.4 241.1 228.7 216.4 204.1 9,558.0 Pole : Location : Height : Shape : Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSI/TIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : 11 Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/2010 1:37:26 PA Page: 3 X Load Case: 1.2D + 1.6W Gust Response Factor : 1.10 Dead Load Factor : 1.20 Wind Load Factor: 1.60 85.00 mph with No Ice 24 Iterations Wind Importance Factor : 1.00 Shaft Segment Forces Seg Top Elev (ft) Description 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 Appertunance(s) 35.00 40.00 Top - Section 1 45.00 50.00 55.00 57.00 Appertunance(s) 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 Top - Section 2 90.00 95.00 100.0 105.0 Appertunance(s) 110.0 115.0 120.0 Appertunance(s) (Factored) qz Kzt Kz (psf) 1.00 0.70 12.300 1.00 0.70 12.300 1.00 0.70 12.300 1.00 0.70 12.300 1.00 0.70 12.300 1.00 0.70 12.300 1.00 0.70 12.310 1.00 0.73 12.865 1.00 0.76 13.365 1.00 0.78 13.822 1.00 0.81 14.245 1.00 0.83 14.638 1.00 0.84 14.788 1.00 0.85 15.006 1.00 0.87 15.353 1.00 0.89 15.682 1.00 0.91 15.994 1.00 0.92 16.292 1.00 0.94 16.577 1.00 0.95 16.849 1.00 0.9717.112 1.00 0.98 17.364 1.00 1.00 17.608 1.00 1.01 17.844 1.00 1.02 18.072 1.00 1.0418.293 Ice qzGh C Thick Tributary Aa (psf) (mph -ft) Cf (ml (ft) (sf) Wind Dead Tot Dead CfAa Force X Load Ice Loan (sf) (Ib) (Ib) (Ib) 13.53 222.71 1.000 0.00 0.000 13.53 217.19 1.000 5.00 15.464 13.53 211.67 1.000 5.00 15.076 13.53 206.141.000 5.00 14.688 13.53 200.62 1.000 5.00 14.300 13.53 195.10 1.000 5.00 13.911 13.54 189.66 1.000 5.00 13.523 14.15 188.23 1.000 5.00 13.135 14.70 186.10 1.000 5.00 12.747 15.20 183.41 1.000 5.00 12.359 15.66 180.25 1.000 5.00 11.970 16.10 176.69 1.000 5.00 11.582 16.26 175.18 1.000 2.00 4.524 16.50 172.81 1.000 3.00 6.670 16.88 168.62 1.000 5.00 10.806 17.25 164.181.000 5.00 10.417 17.59 159.51 1.000 5.00 10.029 17.92 154.64 1.000 5.00 9.641 18.23 149.57 1.000 5.00 9.253 18.53 144.33 1.000 5.00 8.865 18.82 138.94 1.000 5.00 8.476 19.10 133.40 1.000 5.00 8.088 19.36 127.73 1.000 5.00 7.700 19.62 121.93 1.000 19.87 116.01 1.000 20.12 109.98 1.000 Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 7.312 5.00 6.923 5.00 6.535 120.00 0.00 0.0 15.46 334.8 15.08 326.4 14.69 318.0 14.30 309.6 13.91 301.2 13.52 293.0 13.14 297.4 12.75 299.8 12.36 300.6 11.97 300.1 11.58 298.4 4.52 117.7 6.67 176.2 10.81 292.0 10.42 287.5 10.03 282.3 9.64 276.4 9.25 269.9 8.86 262.9 8.48 255.3 8.09 247.2 7.70 238.6 7.31 229.6 6.92 220.2 6.54 210.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 730.1 0.0 711.6 0.0 693.1 0.0 674.6 0.0 656.1 0.0 637.6 0.0 619.2 0.0 600.7 0.0 524.5 0.0 507.9 0.0 491.3 0.0 191.8 0.0 282.8 0.0 458.0 0.0 441.3 0.0 424.7 0.0 408.0 0.0 391.4 0.0 333.6 0.0 318.8 0.0 304.1 0.0 289.3 0.0 274.5 0.0 259.7 0.0 244.9 6,745.5 0.0 11,469.6 • Pole : Location : Height : Shape : Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (inlft) Code: ANSUTIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : II Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/2010 1:37:27 PP Page: 4 X Load Case: 1.2D + 1.6W Gust Response Factor : 1.10 Dead Load Factor : 1.20 Wind Load Factor: 1.60 85.00 mph with No Ice 24 Iterations Wind Importance Factor : 1.00 Discrete Appurtenance Segment Forces (Factored) Elev (ft) Description 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 57.00 57.00 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 Total Horiz Vert Wind Mom Mom Dead qz qzGh CaAa uaAa Ecc Ecc FX Y Z Loan Qty (psf) (psf) Factor Ka (sf) (ft) (ft) (Ib) (lb -ft) (lb -ft) (Ib) Round T -Arm 3 12.310 13.541 0.67 1.00 19.50 0.000 0.000 422.42 0.00 0.00 900.00 14" x 9" TMA 6 12.310 13.541 0.67 1.00 4.94 0.000 0.000 107.13 0.00 0.00 72.00 Decibel DB844G45AXY 9 12.310 13.541 0.78 1.00 49.14 0.000 0.000 1,064.67 0.00 0.00 226.80 72" x 12" Panel 3 12.310 13.541 0.75 1.00 18.90 0.000 0.000 409.49 0.00 0.00 162.00 Round T -Arm 1 14.788 16.267 1.00 1.00 9.70 0.000 0.000 252.46 0.00 0.00 300.00 Decibel DB844H65E- 4 14.788 16.267 1.00 1.00 38.28 0.000 0.000 996.31 0.00 0.00 96.00 Andrew PX2F-52 2 17.608 19.369 1.00 1.00 10.46 0.000 0.000 324.16 0.00 0.00 33.60 Kathrein 84010054 1 17.608 19.369 0.63 1.00 3.26 0.000 0.000 101.12 0.00 0.00 42.00 Huawei RRU3702 4 17.608 19.369 0.67 1.00 6.89 0.000 0.000 213.45 0.00 0.00 211.20 Kathrein 84010054 3 17.608 19.369 0.63 1.00 9.79 0.000 0.000 303.40 0.00 0.00 126.00 Round Side Arm 3 17.608 19.369 0.67 1.00 10.45 0.000 0.000 323.91 0.00 0.00 540.00 Trimble Acutime 2000 1 17.608 19.369 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.000 0.000 9.30 0.00 0.00 1.56 Round T -Arm 3 18.293 20.122 0.67 1.00 19.50 0.000 0.000 627.71 0.00 0.00 900.00 Antel LPA-185090/8CF 6 18.293 20.122 0.88 1.00 14.73 0.000 0.000 474.28 0.00 0.00 50.40 Ante/ BXA-80090/8CF 3 18.293 20.122 0.89 1.00 22.13 0.000 0.000 712.62 0.00 0.00 82.80 Clearcom CCDP-565- 6 18.293 20.122 0.67 1.00 1.81 0.000 0.000 58.24 0.00 0.00 50.40 2' Omni 1 18.293 20.122 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.000 0.000 9.66 0.00 0.00 6.00 GPS Unit 1 18.293 20.122 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 32.20 0.00 0.00 12.00 Ante/ BXA-70063/8CF 3 18.293 20.122 0.78 1.00 24.97 0.000 0.000 803.85 0.00 0.00 86.40 7,246.36 3,899.16 Pole : Location : Height : Shape : Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSI/TIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : II Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/2010 1:37:27 PII Page: 5 X Load Case: 1.2D+1.6W Gust Response Factor : 1.10 Dead Load Factor : 1.20 Wind Load Factor : 1.60 85.00 mph with No Ice 24 Iterations Wind Importance Factor : 1.00 Linear Appurtenance Segment Forces Seg Top Elev (ft) Description Exposed To Wind 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 57.00 (5) 1 5/8" Coax (12)1 5/8" Coax (5) 1 5/8" Coax (12)1 5/8" Coax (5)1 5/8" Coax (5)1 5/8" Coax Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (Factored) Exposed Width (in) Length (ft) Ca 5.00 0.000 5.00 0.000 5.00 0.000 5.00 0.000 5.00 0.000 2.00 0.000 Area CaAa qz (sqft) (sqft) (psf) Cf Adjust F X Ra Factor (Ib) Dead Load (Ib) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.300 12.300 12.300 12.300 12.300 14.788 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.60 59.03 24.60 59.03 24.60 9.84 Totals: 0.00 201.70 Pole : Location : Height : Shape: Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSI/TIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : II Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/2010 1:37:40 PP Page: 6 X Load Case: 1.0D + 1.0W 60.00 mph Serviceability Gust Response Factor : 1.10 Dead Load Factor : 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 23 Iterations Wind Importance Factor : 1.00 Applied Segment Forces Summary Seg Elev (ft) Lateral FX (-) (Ib) Axial FY (-) (Ib) Torsion MY (lb -ft) Moment MZ (lb -ft) 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 57.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.0 105.0 110.0 115.0 120.0 0.00 334.77 326.36 317.96 309.56 301.15 2,296.70 297.40 299.83 300.65 300.10 298.39 1,366.52 176.16 291.99 287.52 282.32 276.44 269.95 262.88 255.28 247.18 1.513.96 229.62 220.21 2,928.96 Totals: 13,991.84 0.00 730.09 871.39 852.90 834.41 815.92 2,158.23 719.91 701.42 625.29 608.65 592.01 628.14 328.47 534.13 517.49 500.85 484.21 467.57 409.80 395.01 380.22 1,319.78 345.32 .330.53 1,503.74 17,655.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pole : Location: Height : Shape : Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSI/TIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : 11 Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/20101:37:40 PP Page: 7 X Load Case: 1.0D + 1.0W Gust Response Factor : 1.10 Dead Load Factor : 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 60.00 mph Serviceability 23 Iterations Wind Importance Factor : 1.00 Calculated Forces Seg Pu Vu Elev FY (-) FX (-) (ft) (kips) (kips) 0.00 -17.63' -14.03 5.00 -16.84 -13.76 10.00 -15.92 -13.49 15.00 -15.01 -13.23 20.00 -14.13 -12.97 25.00 -13.27 -12.70 30.00 -11.12 -10.40 35.00 -10.37 -10.13 40.00 -9.64 -9.85 40.00 -9.64 -9.85 45.00 -8.98 -9.56 50.00 -8.35 -9.27 55.00 -7.74 -8.97 57.00 -7.16 -7.60 60.00 -6.81 -7.43 65.00 -6.27 -7.13 70.00 -5.74 -6.84 75.00 -5.23 -6.55 80.00 -4.74 -6.26 85.00 -4.27 -5.98 85.00 -4.27 -5.98 90.00 -3.86 -5.70 95.00 -3.47 -5.43 100.00 -3.09 -5.16 105.00 -1.89 -3.55 110.00 -1.56 -3.29 115.00 -1.25 -3.05 120.00 0.00 -2.93 Tu Mu Mu MY MZ MX (ft -kips) (ft -kips) (ft -kips) Resultant Moment (ft -kips) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,019.54 -949.40 -880.60 -813.13 -746.98 -682.16 -618.64 -566.63 -515.99 -515.99 -466.76 -418.95 -372.58 -354.63 -331.85 -294.71 -259.04 -224.83 -192.08 -160.76 -160.76 -130.88 -102.38 -75.24 -49.44 -31.70 -15.24 0.00 0.00 1,019.54 0.00 949.40 0.00 880.60 0.00 813.13 0.00 746.98 0.00 682.16 0.00 618.64 0.00 566.63 0.00 515.99 0.00 515.99 0.00 466.76 0.00 418.95 0.00 372.58 0.00 354.63 0.00 331.85 0.00 294.71 0.00 259.04 0.00 224.83 0.00 192.08 0.00 160.76 0.00 160.76 0.00 130.88 0.00 102.38 0.00 75.24 0.00 49.44 0.00 31.70 0.00 15.24 0.00 0.00 phi phi phi phi Total Pn Vn Tn Mn Deflect Rotation (kips) (kips) (ft -kips) (ft -kips) (in) (deg) Ratio 2,382.61 1,191.31 3,536.89 1,746.74 2,349.77 1,174.89 3,400.15 1,679.21 2,315.56 1,157.78 3,263.94 1,611.94 2.279.97 1.139.99 3,128.41 1.545.00 2,243.01 1,121.51 2,993.71 1,478.48 2,204.68 1,102.34 2,860.00 1,412.45 2,164.98 1,082.49 2,727.44 1,346.98 2,123.91 1,061.95 2,596.17 1,282.15 2,081.46 1,040.73 2,466.35 1,218.04 1,804.33 902.16 2,142.61 1,058.15 1,769.26 884.63 2,034.72 1,004.87 1,732.82 866.41 1,927.93 952.13 1,695.00 847.50 1,822.40 900.01 1,679.50 839.75 1,780.57 879.35 1,655.82 827.91 1,718.27 848.59 1,615.26 807.63 1,615.70 797.94 1,563.28 781.64 1,505.17 743.35 1,503.20 751.60 1,391.05 686.99 1,443.12 721.56 1,281.42 632.84 1,383.04 691.52 1,176.29 580.93 1,231.23 615.61 1,050.33 518.72 1,177.82 588.91 960.67 474.44 1,124.42 562.21 875.02 432.14 1.071.02 535.51 793.36 391.81 1,017.62 508.81 715.70 353.46 964.21 482.11 642.05 317.08 910.81 455.41 572.39 282.68 857.41 428.70 506.73 250.25 0.00 0.00 0.591 0.13 -0.23 0.573 0.50 -0.47 0.553 1.11 -0.70 0.533 1.98 -0.94 0.512 3.08 -1.17 0.489 4.43 -1.40 0.465 6.02 -1.63 0.447 7.85 -1.86 0.428 7.85 -1.86 0.493 9.92 -2.09 0.470 12.24 -2.34 0.445 14.83 -2.59 0.419 15.93 -2.69 0.408 17.66 -2.83 0.395 20.76 -3.07 0.373 24.11 -3.31 0.352 27.70 -3.54 0.331 31.53 -3.77 0.307 35.59 -3.98 0.280 35.59 -3.98 0.313 39.86 -4.18 0.279 44.36 -4.39 0.240 49.05 -4.57 0.195 53.92 -4.72 0.142 58.91 -4.83 0.102 64.01 -4.91 0.055 69.16 -4.93 0.000 Pole : Location : Height : Shape: Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSI/TIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : II Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/2010 1:37:41 PP Page: 8 X Analysis Summary Load Case 1.2D + 1.6W 0.9D + 1.6W 1.2D + 1.0Di + 1.0Wi 1.2D + 1.0E 0.9D + 1.0E 1.0D + 1.0W Reactions Shear Shear Axial Moment Moment Moment FX FZ FY MX MY MZ (kips) (kips) (kips) (ft -kips) (ft -kips) (ft -kips) 14.03 0.00 17.63 0.00 0.00 1019.54 14.02 0.00 13.21 0.00 0.00 1010.92 4.19 0.00 37.82 0.00 0.00 327.48 8.33 0.00 17.64 0.00 0.00 625.89 8.32 0.00 13.23 0.00 0.00 620.82 4.37 0.00 14.71 0.00 0.00 315.95 Max Usage Elev Interaction (ft) Ratio 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.19 Pole : Location: Height : Shape: Base Dia : Top Dia : Taper: 83050 Riverton, WA 120.0 (ft) 12 Sides 36.30 (in) 14.70 (in) 0.180000 (in/ft) Code: ANSUTIA-222 Rev G Struct Class : II Exposure Category : B Topographic Category : 1 Base Elev : 0.000 (ft) Copyright Semaan Engineering Solutions, Inc Y 7/29/2010 1:37:41 PA Page: 9 X Base Summary Reactions Original Design Moment Axial Shear (kip -ft) (kip) (kip) Analysis Moment Axial (kip -ft) (kip) Shear Moment (kip) Design % 1,222.00 14.20 17.50 1,019.54 37.82 Base Plate Yield (ksi) 60.0 Thick Width (in) (in) Style 14.03 83.43 Poly Clip Len Effective Mu Phi Mn Sides (in) Len (in) (kip -in) (kip -in) Ratio 2.000 52.000 Polygon Anchor Bolts Bolt Num Circle Bolts 44.10 08 Bolt Bolt Type Dia (in) 2.25" 18J 2.25 12 0.00 14.590 397.19 787.85 0.50 Start Compression — Tension Yield Ultimate Cluster Angle Force Allow Force Allow (ksi) (ksi) Arrange Dist (in) (deg) (kip) (kip) Ratio (kip) (kip) Ratio 75.00 100.00 Radial 0.00 0.0 143.44 260.00 0.57 133.99 260.00 0.53 Site Name: Riverton, WA Site Number: 83050 Engineer: SAW Engineering Number: 45378322 Date: 7/29/2010 Design Base Loads (Factored) - Analysis per TIA-222-G Standards Foundation Mapped: N Moment (M): 1019.5 k -ft Shear/Leg (V): 14.0 k Compression/Leg (P): 37.8 k Uplift/Leg (U): 0.0 k Tower Type (GT / SST / MP): MP Diameter of Caisson (d): Caisson Embedment (L -h): Caisson Height Above Ground (h): Depth Below Ground Surface to Water Table (w): Unit Weight of Concrete: Unit Weight of Water: Tension Skin Friction/Compression Skin Friction: Pullout Angle: Soil Mechanical Properties Program Last Updated: 5/26/2010 American Tower Corporation 6.0 ft 48.5 ft 0.5 ft 12.0 ft 150.0 pcf 62.4 pcf 1.00 30.0 degrees Depth (ft) yscni Cohesion (I) Ultimate Skin Ultimate Bearing Top Bottom (pcf) (psf) (degree) Friction (psf) Pressure (psf) 0.0 2.0 85 0 0 2.0 12.0 85 0 0 12.0 28.0 85 0 0 28.0 38.0 100 0 20 38.0 49.5 125 0 35 20000 Required Embedment: 39.6 ft - OK, Caisson Embedment Satisfactory Volume of Concrete: 1385.4 ft3 = 51.3 yd3 Weight of Concrete (Buoyancy Effect Considered): 143.4 k Average Soil Unit Weight: 49.8 pcf Skin Friction Resistance: 0.0 k Compressive Bearing Resistance: 565.5 k Pullout Weight (Minus Concrete Weight): 2620.2 k Nominal Uplift Capacity per Leg (4) T„): 107.6 k Nominal Compressive Capacity per Leg (4s130): 424.1 k P,,: 125.4 k T„/4),T,,: 0.00 Result: OK PAsP0: 0.30 Result: OK Total Lateral Resistance: 1680.7 k Inflection Point (Below Ground Surface): 39.2 ft Design Overturning Moment At Inflection Point (M0): 1577.0 k -ft Nominal Moment Capacity (4)5M„ ): 11873.9 k -ft Mp/4sMn: 0.13 Result: OK (l)s: 0.80 Caisson Strength Capacity Concrete Compressive Strength (Pc): Vertical Steel Rebar Size #: Vertical Steel Rebar Area: Required # of Vertical Rebar to Satisfy Reinforcement Ratio: # of Vertical Steel Rebars: Vertical Steel Rebar Yield Strength (FY): Horizontal Tie / Stirrup Size #: Horizontal Tie / Stirrup Area: Design Horizontal Tie / Stirrup Spacing: Horizontal Tie / Stirrup Steel Yield Strength (FY): Rebar Cage Diameter: Strength Bending/Tension Reduction Factor (4)B): Strength Shear Reduction Factor (4)v): Strength Compression Reduction Factor (4)v): Steel Elastic Modulus: Design Moment (Mu): Nominal Moment Capacity (4BMn): Mu/4BMn: Design Shear (Vu): Nominal Shear Capacity (4vVn): Vu/4)vVn: Design Tension (Tu): Nominal Tension Capacity (4TTn): Tu/4TTn : Design Compression (Pu): Nominal Compression Capacity (4)PP.): Pu/4PPn: Bending Reinforcement Ratio: Mu/4BMn + Tu/4TTn: 3000 psi 10 1.27 in2 17 48 Minimum # of vertical rebar met for RR 60 ksi 4 0.20 int 18.0 in 60 ksi 64.0 in 0.90 ACI318-05 - 9.3.2.1 0.75 ACI318-05 - 9.3.2.3 0.65 ACI318-05 - 9.3.2.2 29000 ksi 1026.6 k -ft 8585.0 k -ft - ACI318-005 -10.2 0.12 Result: OK 51.2 k 336.1 k - ACI318-05 -11.3.1.1 or 11.5.7.2 0.15 Result: OK 0.0 k 3291.8 k - AC1318-05 -10.2 0.00 Result: OK 125.4 k 6256.4 k - AC1318-05 -10.3.6.2 0.02 Result: OK 0.015 Reinforcement Ratio is Satisfactory - ACI318-05 - 10.8.4 & 10.9.1 0.12 Result: OK RZA RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical & Environmental Consukants 1400 140th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, Washington 980054594 (206) 746-8020/FAX (206) 746-6364 8 July 1991 U.S. West NewVector 3350 161st Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98008 Attention: Mr. Ray Ancel Subject: Gentlemen: GEO .:. REC.EIVED• • ..10i1 5 1991 -Cpt,Pipl TION DEPT. W:. , `OP ^ROUP shiati Limited Geotechnical Evaluation and Subsurface Exploration Proposed Sea -Riverton 2 Communications Tower 13130 44th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington W-7687 This tetter report presents the results of our limited geotechnical engineering evaluation and subsurface exploration conducted for the above referenced . project. Verbal . authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Peter Stricken of Jean Fraley Architects on 18 June 1991. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of U.S. West NewVector Group and their agents for specific application to this project. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed site is located at 13130 44th Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The site is currently occupied by Clark Construction Company. The topography across the site is essentially flat due to site grading and placement of undocumented fill soils on portions of the site which includes the project site. We understand that the proposed design calls for a 120 foot high monopole transmission tower to be built on the site. A small equipment building is to be built relatively close to the monopole. At the time of writing this report, a generalized site plan had been supplied to us. Therefore, the site plan in this report should be considered accurate to the degree implied. U.S. West NewVector -; The soils disclosed by our boring consisted of approximately 4 feet of loose, moist to wet, silty sand fill underlain by native soils. The native soil sequence beneath the fill consisted of marine and slack water deposits over glacially deposited soils. Underlying the loose, silty sand/sandy silt fill, approximately 4 feet of very loose silty sand and very soft silty day/clayey silt was encountered over approximately 3 feet of fibrous peat. The • peat was encountered between approximately 8 to 11 feet beneath the existing ground surface. Beneath the peat, approximately 14 feet of interbedded very loose silty sand and very soft sandy silty clay was encountered. The soils were so soft that the drilling rods sunk through the soil by their own weight during sampling. At approximately 25 feet beneath the existing ground surface the soils graded from very loose to medium dense. At approximately 38 feet the soils graded from medium dense to very dense. Soils beneath 25. feet typically consisted of silty sand, gravelly silty sand, and gravelly sandy silt. At the time of drilling, groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 13 feet. It is our opinion that, given enough time, groundwater levels would have risen closer to the ground surface. Subsurface seepage volumes and groundwater levels should be anticipated to vary with season, precipitation, site usage, and other factors. _:?,:::,;;; _..•.. + U.S. West NewVector 8 July 1991 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . The proposed project -consists of constructing a 120 -loot high monopole communications tower and equipment bulding in Tukwila, Washington. Subsurface conditions disclosed by our boring are considered marginally feasible, but difficult for the proposed project utilizing either deep or mat foundations, or a combination of the two foundation systems. Special foundation considerations must be addressed with respect to the subsurface conditions encountered.. We understand a mat foundation can possibly be utilized where deep deposits of relatively loose, saturated soils are present. To provide overturning resistance, the mat foundation for the tower could also include a deep foundation system such as augercast piles or drilled piers. Overexcavation and replacement of the undocumented fill, very soft clay and peat does not appear feasible due to thevertical extent at which these soils occur (25 feet deep). it is our opinion that the equipment building should can be constructed directly upon the shallow existing site fill soils. We recommend that the upper one foot of existing fill be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its modified Proctor maximum dry density according to ASTM:D 1557. If 90 percent compaction cannot be achieved, we recommend placing a minimum one foot thick layer of imported, compacted, structural fill over the existing soils. The structural fill should be compacted as recommended above. It should be noted that some settlement will occur beneath the equipment building in either case due to the soft soils and peat in the upper 25 feet. Precautionary methods could be taken to provide for relevefng of the building as settlement occurs. Connections between the building and tower should be flexible enough to accommodate this anticipated settlement. To expedite earthwork, we recommend using a clean granular fill. We recommend clean granular fill contain less than 5 percent fines by weight for that portion of the sample passing the U.S. No. 4 sieve. We recommend utilizing an allowable bearing pressure of 1000 pounds per square foot for the equipment building. This value may be increased by up to one-third to accommodate transient loads such as wind or seismic forces. We estimate total settlement on the order of 1 to 3 inches, with differential settlements on the order of one- half of the total for the equipment building. ;.; U.S. West NewVector 8 July 1991 -7 Page 4 • To further reduce settlements of the equipment building, use of a lightweight fill could be considered. Pumice or flyash material would be suitable for backfill beneath the equipment building. We do not recommend the use of fight weight fills unless they can be verified to be chemically inert While monopole foundations typically can gain support from drilled piers, the soils at this site were in a loose or very soft wet to saturated condition, and open hole drilling would not be feasible. Smaller diameter (18 to 24 -inch) augercast piling could be installed and are typically limited to a depth of 40 times the pile diameter, andtherefore the number of piling beneath a cap may be prohibitive. We understand that vertical bearing capacity, and resistance to uplift and horizontal loading are typically provided on such sites using a mat foundation for self-supporting towers. However, mat foundations do not appear feasible based on the subsurface conditions encountered during our exploration. The peat and zero-blowcount days, silts and sand would not provide adequate bearing support for a mat, particularly to resist overturning stresses. For the tower mat foundation, the "footing width" will be much greater, and will therefore produce compression of a much greater thickness of underlying soils. For a rough estimation of total settlement we would assume a modulus of elasticity (ES) of 8,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for soils within a depth equal to one-half the width of the mat foundation. Total settlement would be calculated from: S = q(net) * B/2EE where S = total settlement (feet); q(net) = net bearing pressure (psf); and B = width of mat foundation (feet). The actual settlement will depend upon the rigidity of the mat foundation *and the eccentricity of the loading. We can provide more detailed settlement estimates for a particular case of loading, if required. Piles should be constructed to a depth of at least 45 feet. Vertical bearing capacity for augercast piles should be designed neglecting the upper 25 feet as this will provide only minimal resistance. In fact, over time the soils and peat in the upper 25 feet should be expected to consolidate and thus create downdrag loads on that portion of the pile. For : 25-35 feet 1.0 D/B 35-48 feet 4.7 D/B Where D is the depth of embedment into the bearing layer in feet and B is the diameter of the pier in feet. For frictional resistance, acting both downward and in uplift, we recommend using the following values: Embedment Depth Allowable Skin Friction (tsf) 25-35 feet .10 35-48 feet .33 For lateral pressures, we assume the piers will be relatively rigid due to the anticipated large diameter and will act as a pole_ The interaction between a pole and the soil is complex and may be modeled by elastic methods. The passive pressure approach U.S. West NewVector 8 July 1991 W-7687 Page 6 presented herein is more straightforward and is conservative by neglecting redistribution of vertical stress and shear at the pile bottom and below the point of fixity, which would likely serve to resist lateral loads. Therefore, for soils between 4 and 25 feet, we recommend using an allowable passive pressure of 50 pounds per cubic foot (expressed as an equivalent fluid unit weight), acting over 2 pile diameters wide by 8 pile diameters deep, neglecting the uppermost 4 feet of embedment below the ground surface. For soils below 25 feet, we recommend using a maximum allowable passive earth pressure of 300 pcf acting over 2 pile diameters wide by 8 pile diameters deep. The factor of safety with respect to ultimate allowable passive pressure is greater than 1.5, which is a commonly applied to transient wind or seismic loads. We appreciate being of continued service to you on these communication tower projects. We would be available to review your final foundation designs using the above parameters or to refine these recommendations based on specific design parameters as well as to provide construction observation services. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this report or other aspects of the project please do not hesitate to call us at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas A. Jones Project Engineer James S. Dran Associate Enclosure: Figure 1, the Site and Exploration Pian cc: Mr. Peter Stricker/Jean Fraley Architects EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT BUILDING B-1 PROPOSED 120MONOPOLE LEGEND B-1 (9 INDICATES BORING NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION U.S. WEST NEWVECTOR GROUP SEARIVERTON 2 TUKWILA. WASHINGTON SITE & EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 1 wo W-7687 BY TAJ DATE JUL 1991 SCALE N.T.S. RZA • lUTTENIIOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCIAMS, 114C. Geotedinleol & EnYltonznental Consultants 14X 140th Arms N.H. lediel"Q,611.,K. &flaw. Filuldnirton 98005 amosilMnims PROJECT U.S Nest SeaRiverton 2 w.0. W 7587 BORING NO. B-1 E 0* 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION Approximate ground surface elevation: 151 feel g cgo: to• m '15 tz STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE Blows pa foot 10 TO 3D 40 Loose, moist to wet, brown, sr7y SAND/ sandy SILT (rdF) /~ Very soft to sof!, brown -grey, wet, silly - 5 - CLAY/ cicyey SILT Very loose, wet. brown. silly SAND -10 - • -15 Very soft, wet,, brown, /berous PEAT with roots or links Interbedded loose. so/uraled, block -brown, silly fine .SAND and very soft, wet, fon grey, clayey S/LT/silly CLAY - 20 - 25 30 Very soft, wet to so/urcted, grey, son* silly CLAY interbedded, very soft, wet lo so/ured, grey; sandy silty CLAY and silly SAND with some CLAY grading to very loose, silty SAND wr7h some c%y, Iroce shell frogmen/s groding to medium dense, wet to sauced. grey, s77/y &WD with shelf fragments (Continued) 2—Inch OD split— _L. spoon sample S-1 S-2 S-5 Ts -c vir Groundwater level .ia at time of drilling f 10 20 30 40 MOISTURE CONTENT Plastic limit. Natural Liquid limit so 8177 NHOUSE-Z.EWGAN A,5SOCIA77S:5; INC. Ceotcchnica/ L7nioomeotei Consultants 1100 1401b Ave NZ Bellevue. Yeshington 98005 Drilling started: 22 June 1991 Drilling completed: 22 lune 1991 Logged by: 7:11 • • PROJECT U.S: Nest SeaRverton 2 w.a.1f= 887 BORING NO. B-1 -30- • • SOIL DESCRIPTION Approximate ground surface elevation: 151 feet 54 g x c Z Cv7 i0 STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE . 61owa per foot 10 20 30 40 S4ND as above. -40 - - 45 Very dense, moist, grey grove/ly silty SgNO/ grove/' sandy S/1T (gloc o/ /2// Dense wet gre); gravelly silly S4NO with some Joy S-7 S-8 S-9 '-I-5--10 Overslcled - 50 - 55 - 60 Bonny terminoled al opppraremolelj' 18' -r 2—inch OD split— ...L spoon sample Z.E G END Groundwater level AID al time of drilling 10 20 30 .0 MOISTURE CONTENT. Plastic limit Natural Liquid limit R Z A RI77 NHO!!SS-ZEMAN ASSOCIATES. INC Ceofechnica/ a¢ Environmental Consullw,& 1100 110th Arne NB Bellevue. rlastinglan .89003 Drilling started: 22 June 1991 Drilling completed: 22 June 1991 Logged by: T4./ t: , ••' .:, .is.'....,:- :: .... •OATE/ . — ENGINEER PROJECTF''''••••••••i.• ••: • • • JOB NO • • • t•- • RECENED DEC 5 1991 fweirostio DESIGN CALCULATIONS 120' MONOPOLE TOWER & FOUNDATION SEA RIVERTON rft; • Tukwila . Washington - . • NOV 2 7 1991 jp ..pi7P).tc7h:;vv_ DEPT US WEST/NEWVECTOR GROUP, INC. Bellevue Washington For PROJECT #910088 WASHINGTON SITE SEA -Riverton Prepared By: E. MARK MALOUF, PE Sr. Project Engineer Approved By: er /6"-7.dik ROBERT C. HALL, JR. Registered Professional Engineer Washington #16628 November 25, 1991 CEO 1 i 1991 CI Or: .71i OA' i LA PLANMING DEPT. ALPHA TOWER DESIGN INC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 901 WAT'ERFALL WAY SUITE 203 RICHARDSON TEXAS 75080 DESIGN CALCULATIONS SheetxtofJ MONOPOLE CALCULATIONS -J. AIL • : • • Richardson, Texas, (214) 788-2578' MONOPQLE . bESIGN • REVIEW SITE : SEA - Riverton, Tukwila, WA. JOB #: 910088 Monopole Height : .120 Ft LOADING CALCULATIONS From the 1988 UBC Code, and for this site we have: rsA SIciik f) sup wraar. sob ' EEL PICNorac • POLADAIldli MONOPOLE ELEVATION Basic Wind Speed = 90 Mph Exposure = 'C' Ice Thick = 0.50In Ce := 1.8 • (Table 23G) Cq := 1.1 (Table 23H) qs := 21.0 Psf (Table 23F) I := 1.0 The Design Wind Pressure is given by: p := Ce•Cq•gs•I (Eq. 11.1) a=41.6 Psf Use P := 42.0 Psf Determine Concentrated Force at Top: Antennas: (3) ALP 6014 CO118' (30.7.sf) • (1)2'HPant •@.118'(4.4sf) (6) ALP 9214 @75''(92.3 s4.: Then: . A1=30.7 +4.4,= 35.1 sf ; .• A2=92.3 sf Aproj 1 :- 35.1Sf Aproj 2 :- 92.30 Si F1 := P•Aproj1 F2 := P•Aproj2 F 1 = 1474.2 Lbs F2 = 3876.6 Lbs Determine Base Reactions from Wind Loads: j. OVERTURNING MOMENT: H := 120.0 ft - Monopole Ht ODb := 36.3 in - Dia © Base ODt := 15.75 in - Dia © Top MOM :- F1•H+F2•(75)4H•(0Db+1)+(0Dt+1) 1 P H 2 12 I 2 MOM = 1.1.106 ft -lbs Using EIA RS922E requirements, the base OT Moment controls over UBC requirements. Refer to computer printout for details. Use Mom := 1222. ft -K - Overturning Moment Base (per Valmont) II. HORIZONTAL BASE SHEAR: Ph := F1 +F2 -i- (0Db+1,+(0Dt+1) 1 • 2 12 Ph = 16701.3 Lbs Using EIA RS222E requirements, the base Shear controls over UBC requirements. • . Refer to computer printout for details. Use Phz := 17.5 Kips - Horiz Shear (per Valmont) 111. VERTICAL LOAD; Use • Pvt := 14.2 Kips - Vertical Load (per Valmont) From 1988 UBC, the site is in Seismic Zone 3, Then we have: Z := 0.300 (Table 231) I := 1.00 C := 2.75 (Max Value) • Rw :=, 4.0 7 (Table 23Q) W := Pvt • • Determining the Total Lateral Seismic Force, the Seismic Base Shear is given by: •- - ••C v :ZI = - • w Rw (Eq. 12-1) V = 2.9 Kips - Seismic Base Shear From above calculations, the Wind Loads Control - USE WIND LOAD REACTIONS FOR MONOPOLE DESIGN CHECK The Monopole is analyzed for the above loading. Refer to the following sheet for more details on analysis results. } 49oww Richardson, Texas 214-783-2578 MONOPOLE ANALYSIS: MONOPOLE HEIGHT: 120 FT - Valmont SITE LOCATION SEA - RIVERTON, Tukwila, Washington CUENT NAME US West/ NewVector JOB NUMBER #910088 Sheetofjlp By : MM Program Description: The monopole is modeled for the computer analysis as a uniform cantilevered beam with a fixed support. Monopole is divided into 5' element members and antennae are applied as concentrated Toads. The analysis is done in conformance with EIA RS222E Standard. Specifications / Code Requirements: Basic Wind Velocity Specified: 90.00 Mph " Control Ice Thickness : 0.50 Inch UBC -88 Code Wind Velocity : 80.00 Mph Antenna Loading : 1-2' Dia HP Ant ®118' 3 -ALP 6014 Ants on T Arm 6118' 6-ALP9214 Ants on 2 -T -Arm 075' Monopole Characteristics: Pole Height : 120.00 Ft Pole Taper : -0.1800 in/ft Pole Weight : 10.40 Kips Base Diameter : 36.30 Inch Steel Yield Strength : 65.00 Ksi Pole Shape : 12sided Summary of Analysis : Proj Area . =-' 4.40 Sq.Ft Proj Area; 30.70 • Sq.F1 Proj Area= . 92.30 Sq.Ft MOMENT 0 BASE . 1316.11 Ft -Kips SHEAR 0 BASE . 17.06 Kips VERT WT OBASE . 14.56 Kips MAX STRESS RATIO = 1.198 Less Than 1.33 - SATISFACTORY Page 1 4k 3oawfr Stair, . Richardson, Texas 214-783-2578 MONOPOLE ANALYSIS: (Continued) MONOPOLE HEIGHT: SITE LOCATION JOB NUMBER • Sheet G ofik . By : MM. • • 120 FT - Valmont SEA - RIVERTON, Tukwila, Washington #910088 Monopole Wind Loading: Memb # TopElev ' • Thick O:D. O.D.ice Kz ` .. C " C f Shear* • Mom Ft In In In Kips ft -K .a:'..' Z5,> �"' {.$,>'°Gx < 9R \ rs•3 2 >i } s�nti - F.y` ::`.::�:. '� Q! A`�..:�"'' < ><: 2 i,�'4:$�..f...>.w...�>.w.>37id>%�.>:S.w.,,o>.).c.(.;::: 23 115.00 0.250 15.60 16.60 1.429 .148.8 ' 1.027 2.17 11. 1 105.00 0.250 17.40 18.40 1.392 162.8 ' 1.027 iX ��SS�S{t�i'mKm F:4:bn >»•>vr YnD)4S,w,^>T>X-0tnY.Jt:t JiX:-•:iC�>:; :.rJC" `?:�Yw mNSSX.�:'..• ySS:.MNXc:t9:? a <10r-'inUQOn�Q.250>18 30 < 2.89 38. "i•TP•O.V.l•.L"rte• •iii 19 95.00 .0.250 15.60 16.60 1.353 144.8 .1.027 3.68 73. ' �^,.»•Yt: :,;.; •n ...,...<,X....4.n};;ro;n:Ya;",•.^:(•ar>x+4:^4:4n. .. ...:: xt:w::<:ai::':.:a' >ax<c+,:.)X: s;,.«.:.:a::•Xi:as ::.. •.::vr:.>f,.,.,:. • . 'kat?,X: x Y,•;,:... ;;• s .. : > r'. F»•,X • SFl E?4�w`" `�Q1xt 82 3ro.s«5.. <,n' fiicx �vr.:f.. :: - ✓.. y.. �4n�.`V'aE:a�(.,:5,. ,u d�.•o.., >:,.,.aY ..�: .w+4:U/�: ie.,r......o..a:w.H..::,.:.:.,!,..)#.fix,., n-a�i,.:s..ii i S g.. :�:u.: 17 85.00 0.281 17.40 18.40 1.311 158.0 1.027 4.36 115. �'M:4 \:.tn + 7::""n4 <ti ( S:v \ <ti < 9Y' . 4 ^•ni`S 4 • '(: i Af V S f : < tNS^M,Y .p',,[' .< :••Y •, 4:0 Oft -aA7A�' LAA0.:..`r1CA°A.:::...:V�M•�r-:i::::�..-A�.-�n ::,.Yinrf:: 15»sa 0, vn,,.....m.... .: -- Wvuv%>i>In S' APV, • ,� ..... ' S...4:,a.. ?... "2:)i'::n . 15 75.00 0.281 19.20 20.20 1.265 170.4 1.027 A 9.83 300. 13 65.00 0.281 24.60 25.60 1.214 211.5 1.027 10.67 404. w:.::i..n•.,.�.iO::ni(v: xivfi)i:iri.Yri:ii; M;Yr'vi s2 ,;.)�Yi i::.>:i. .: S:: ifv:IX.:::i:iJv --..: •:- - .- .'i + v 11 55.00 0.281 26.40 27.40 1.157 221.1 1.027 11.61 518. 45.00 0.281 28.20 29.20 1.093 228.9 1.027 12.56 641. Page 2 • • ••. ••••• • Ayw, 7 Aar, 3no. Monopole Wind Loadinglgontinued) Memb #TopElev Thick O.D. O.D.Ice Kz C f Shear* Mom Ft In In In Kips ft -K 35.00 0.313 30.00 31.00 1.017 . 234.5 1.027 13.51 774. 3000 '0 313 3090 31• V:$M1 • .5.^.,••• • 'I... ••• • • •'T •••••••,..... • ••• ••••••*•••?.• 90 1 000 2393 1 027 13 99 844 i'vtA v . ••••,.. • • .• .•••• • . • •••• !. • •,••• ... • 25.00 0.313 31.80 32.80 1.000 246.0 1.027 14.47 916. 2000 0313-32 70 3370 1 000 252.8.;,*1 027 1496 991• 15.00 0.313 33.60 34.60 1.000 259.5 1.027 15.46 1068. 1000 0 313 +6,...4 11•••••••••••••••.153 50 3&50 1 6OO 2663 1 027" 15 98 1148 , • v.• V 5.00 0.313 35.40 36.40 1.000 273.0 1.027 16.51 1231. • : • • baso .:AA'1 • (.•• s•••..1316 •Horiz Wind Shear Is calculated per EIA RS222E sect 2.3.2 Page 3 414a. Yocum, Asir, Richardson, Texas. 214-783-2578 MONOPOLE ANALYSIS: (Continued) MONOPOLE HEIGHT: SITE LOCATION JOB NUMBER 120 FT - Valmont SEA - RIVERTON, Tukwila, Washington #910088 Monopole Wind Loading: Sheetiofik By MM Memb #ropElev Thick - ID. _Km MIS Fb* Ratio Ft In In In 1n4 ft -K KsI 24 120.00 0.250 14.70 14.20 40.3 . , • •.• .• "1510 455 • "^4 . 22 110.00 0.250 16.50 16.00 51.1 23. 5.511 41.85 0.132 , .. , .. • Q .Q 20 100.00 0.250 18.30 17.80 63.1 '54. 10.328 41.85 0.247 ,- 58 18 90.00 0.250 16.50 16.00 51.1 93. 21.792 41.85 .0.521 637 115' 21580 4f85 �'6 .;:4•Ac 16 80.00 0.281 18.30 17.74 706 138. 23.475 41.85 0.561 5 75bos1 1G20 18 77.9 3O 46194 41 85 1104 !so, 351. 35.180 41.85 0.841 14 70.00 0.281 23.70 23.14 119.7 • • .. 404• , 12 60.00 0.281 25.50 24.94 139.0 460. 39.727 41.85 0.949 Page 4 • 440,. gelLUM, Monopole Wind Loading:(Continued) • **: •. • • Sheet_Loille. By : MM • Memb #TopEleii Thick O.D. I.D. Mom. M/S Fb* Ratio • Ft In In In In4 ft -K Ks i 11 55.00 0.281 26.40 25.84 149.1 • 518. 41.692 41.85 0.996 4185l05�0d ib21. 2730 26i4 '1596 ,578 43489g:.:c• SC.V.V.50, -9 45.00 0.281 28.20 27.64 170.5 641. 45.137 .41.85 ' . 1.079 ?itAglig.9-1.1Z:..Aing9k.:44. -2,4itliffig. alit* -, „ftwttf.evmsrpo...44,z-tys,s:::mAnwpx.r.x.vemvomv,t. ....4s,k 7 35.00 0.313 30.00 29.38 214.1 . 774. 43.384 . .• • 41.85 ' 1 .037 ........ . 'i'$'I,4..,k,a":mW,..,f.„aakx•W*w.K1616„... :n. A(..,4,.,,2,,:s... ,....„„'?......„..„..w4Ir'e%.,a..,.s'.k01....2.0„,....4.„,?74.3„1.„,§,A,.,',.:1Vm:4 ,.1. §,,2,.„A„t1..•„A.:o,0,.„4„6,:L...?$..;.:.1›,.;.•..:4..,.1...).v4!2......,.,a:„...i:.w6:•::45,227.,......g,,-..„.o3..„h..i.4S,.i.,..ar..Vre84:a,41.„:5„A74} 4..8:44,:r.p; a ZJ..:.!,...r. 1...V.A.Y.• .106...§.... 5 25.00 • 0.313 31.80 31.18 241.0 . 916. 45.627 41.85 1.090 L"'"sotro'foT*T"SiVeganfo#151itlglnziP7.,,,A§§1m741WrittAiregePATIII :,..,.?......„...&....&$. ..:::i'ic%...-..,...4.:4.-A:;:e..... ...' .....,a,........,..,....!....aVI'm,,,,,,, •••••"..:1;t.4.....li?.::.„........4r-...7.,...,..s.'14,..?,k'...,.%:,4i..ibi..:. 3 15.00 0.313 33.60 32.98 269.5 ' ' 1068. 47.578 ... • " 41.85 ... - .1.137 00„.....w.mo.,„„.,..,......„,,,...„z„ma ,.„,,v,,..„:,„„,,,:v:w,,,,,,,„.gi.,...."..,..,,,,07441T.,,witar.(0.34TIg:....i,,,- .7,-..,, .,...,0„31:3,,x..f,.34.:.50.w.,-.33<.58::g04 Ze-;;,....,4,... ...,. : -.:4.2,.: . , ,,,wsz- , :-.. 5 , ,.,,,.,4 ;...., . 2:a.'aii:•Ma...{ '.4?'...a.‘ ..,•:',."Mia.v. , '.4..%*.,,t.Z*N44,,Art$A,....X.:...e..""uimt. 4:::. ..:§giv 1 5.00 0.313 35.40 34.78 299.5 : - .1231. : 49.311 .:. - - 41.850. 1.178 iswllkpr,... ,,,,....m...N... E..A.,,,„..,,,.,„"....„.-..,...,..,.ood l.:.,.63 3568 „..........t.„.„,„,,.‘. 1374.I..7.4,10,gi. ,. Allowable Stress is calculated pertlA RS222E Table 5 Page 5 • . ichardson, Texas, (214) 783-2578..4,,4 ANCHOR BOLTS CHECK:.:: (8) 2.25' x 119' anchorBolts A615 @ 44:1" Bolt Circle, f ' then: Fcpl := Mom. 12 44.1.0.75.3 Anchor Bolt Capacity is: '°'Bcap 3.976-.8.0.6.75.1.33 AB cap = 190.4 Kips Tensi+ AB cap >Fcpl OK! F 75 Ksi - Steel Bolts f c 3000. Psi -. Concrete Y:= Modified Basic Development Length is: Ld-L°11-1 Y Allowable Bond Stress is S 1.33.0.6-8•' FY'1000 fess . 12.25 • n •L d J Requ'd Development Length:: Fcp1=147.8 Kips Ste= 468.4Psi.: 000 Ldreg :_F cpi.1 2.25•1n�Stress L dreg = 53.9 in < Ld Provided=119 in From the analysis. THE MONOPOLE IS SATISFACTORY FOR THE PROPOSED LOADING, Sheet_a_pf_ik - • • --- FOUNDATION CALCULATIONS FOUNDATION DESIGN: From above calculations, the Wind Loads . Control - USE WIND LOAD REACTIONS FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN. • SOIL PARAMETERS The Soil parameters are based on Geotechnical Report prepared by Rittenhouse -Zeman & Assoc..,Inc, dated July 8, 1991,with the following allowables: Allowable Bearing Capacity: qau := 20.3 Ksf -.@ 48'-0" depth or lower based on 4.7D/B in tsf r• Ppai := 100.0 Psf / ft depth - Allowable • Passive Pressure ( for . 4'-25' depth). - Pp a := 600.0 Psf / ft depth -• Allowable Passive Pressure ( from 25' depth 'Or lower).. FOUNDATION BASE REACTIONS:" ••• • • From the monopole analisi,:the—b"ase reactions are as follows: ft -K - Overturning Moment @ Mom = 1222 Base (per Valmont) Phz = 17.5 Kips - Horiz Shear (per Valmont) Pvt = 14.2 Kips - Vertical Load (per Valmont) PIER DESIGN Design,pier as aJ3IGID From Base reactions, LateralResistanoe will control design. For ease Of fit of the Monopole base, Use a 61 -ON Dia Pier. We have the Following: (refer to figure) Ph := Phz 1000 Lbs - Horiz Shear c := -1%-1-(11--11 +0.5 Ht of Load Phz Application A := 48.0 ft - Depth of Pier d := 6.0 ft - Dia. of Pier The Maximum Lateral Pressure is given by: 12 -Ph •c 6 •Ph' S1:= 2 Ad . A •d • Ref: ,Transtnission Structures (NAVFAC) RigkJPiies -, Concrete Footings Formula 103-07. ' Then: Si = 1432.9 Psf We have the following: b2•Ph-(A+2-c) := 2•Ph+S1•A•d Then: a := A - b S2 := a2 -SI 4 • A • b 1000 Pbrg := Pvt d2 ir • — 4 b = 14.7 ft a = 33.3 ft S2 = 559.5 Psf Pbrg = 502.2 Psf • • . . • • ," ••• • Neki,Yiwva fIiiin, Jn6., Richardson, Texas, (214) 783-257e.i • Checking Against Allowable Soil Pressures, we have: @ Depth a/2: • S2 = 559.5 Psf PPI PPal -41 • a Ppl = 1262.5 Psf > S2 - OK 4) Depth A: Si = 1432.9 Psf Pp2 PPal 21 +Ppa2 •(A- 25) Pp2 = 15900 Psf > Si - OK Bc » Pbrg - Ok . From Above calculations, PIER CONFIGURATION IS SATISFACTORY USE 6'-0" Dia X 48176" Drilled Pier ' • !'"?.. •••• • .• Jo., Richardson, Texas, (214) 783-2578 • PIER REINFORCEMENT ..itiscom,,,,, The Maximum Moment In the Pier is given by: w0.T COMM Pini RI..I[VATIOW M := Ph c+a 1000 M = 1812.64ft-K Using a 48 Bar pattern for reinforcement, and the simplifying assumptions as shown in figure, we have the following: al := 1.65 dl := 64.0in For #10 Bars: AblO := lin^2 The Resisting Moment is given by: Mr := 17-Ab10-al •dl For #10 Bars: For #9 Bars: Mr = 2279.9ft-K Ab9 := 1.00 in^2 The Resisting Moment is given by: Mr := 17-Ab9=a1-d1 Mr = 1795.2 ft -K USE (48) #10 Vert. Bars 0 5'-6" Dia. SEE ALSO COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR STEEL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN. 104 SECTION TIE SPACING: Using #4 Ties, From UBC -88, sect. 2607.3.B, seismic Zone 3 : Tie Spacing @ Top & Bot: Min (8 Db, 24 Dt, 0.5 D ) = 10 in Length Requ: Max(1/6 A, D)= 6 ft Remaining Length, Tie Spacing: Min (16Db, 48Dt, 1/2D) = 20 in USE #4 Ties © 9"O.C. for Top & Bot 6'0" & 0 18" O.C. for remaining_Length • ALPHA TOWER DESIGN, Inc PIER FOUNDATION DESIGN 120' MONOPOLE, RIVERTON, TUKWILA, WA - 910088 SINGLE PIER FOUNDATION * * * D LOAD HORIZONTAL SHEAR UPLIFT FIXED END MOMENT ESIGN ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE ALLOW SOIL PASSIVE PRESSURE,@TOP ALLOW SOIL PASSIVE PRESSURE,@BOT ALLOWABLE CONCRETE STRESS ALLOWABLE STEEL STRESS D ATA * * * = 14.22 KIPS • 17.49 KIPS .00 KIPS += 1222.50 FOOT KIPS • 15.00 KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT = 100.00 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT • 600.00 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 3.00 KIPS PER SQUARE INCH = 33.75 KIPS PER SQUARE INCH ** * PIER DESIGN THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS INDICATE THE CONDITIONS WHICH DETERMINE THE DESIGN CONFIGURATION: BELL DIAMETER DETERMINED BY INPUT SHAFT DIAMETER DETERMINED BY INPUT PIER DEPTH DETERMINED BY INPUT UPLIFT DETERMINED USING 30h EARTH CONE METHOD PIER STEEL DETERMINED BY COLUMN TENSION, CONTROLS DEPTH PIER DIAMETER SHAFT DIAMETER BELL PIER BAR SIZE NUMBER NUMBER BARS IN PIER VERTICAL STEEL TIE SIZE VERTICAL STEEL TIE SPACING VERTICAL STEEL TIE SPACING CONCRETE COVERAGE REQUIRED SOIL BEARING PRESSURE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE SHAFT SOIL PRESSURE UPPER,S2 ALLOWABLE SHAFT PRESSURE UPPER SHAFT SOIL PRESSURE LOWER,S1 ALLOWABLE SHAFT PRESSURE LOWER PIER CONCRETE STRESS ALLOWABLE CONCRETE STRESS • 48.00 FEET = 72.00 INCHES 6.00 FEET = 10 BAR SIZE 48 CIRCULAR BAR PATTERN 4 BAR SIZE = 10. IN OC - TOP&BOT 6.00 FT 20. IN OC - REMAINING LENGTH = 3.00 IN CLEAR OVER VERT BARS -ACI 7.70 KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT • 15.00 KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT _ .56 KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 1.66 KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT = 1.43 KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT • 15.00 KIPS SQUARE FOOT = 1.00 KIPS PER SQUARE INCH 1.35 KIPS PER SQUARE INCH UPLIFT ALLOWABLE LOAD = 2656.12 CONCRETE VOLUME TOTAL ALL FOOTINGS PIER VERT STEEL WEIGHT /FOOTING PIER STIRUP STEEL WEIGHT /FOOTING 50.27 = 9862.31 = 363.76 KIPS CUBIC YARDS POUNDS POUNDS 16 c earw re ,,,, ` ,k Q6 PROJECT NAME: ATC SOUTHGATE PARK WA-SEA255 SITE NUMBER:ST/O.TEJ0'E'INGGTON PROJECT TYPE: MODIFICATION TO CURRENT ANTENNA CONFIGURATION ON EXISTING MONOPOLE. NO CHANGES TO EQUIPMENT CABINET ON GROUND OR ELECTRICAL SERVICE PROJECT LOCATION: 13130 44TH AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98168 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTR.CTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS MID ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. NO VARIATIONS OR ROOF IC (IONS TO WORK SHOWN SNAIL BE ONPLEMENTED WITHOUT PRIOR WTUTTEN APPROVAL. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION. NEITHER MORRISON HERSHFIELD NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL BE PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. s) ,vv 8259 REGISTERED ARCHITECT I OBE JE- -Y URA LIAENSED ARCHITECT STATE OF WASHINGTON 8259 6 - - 5 - - 4- - 3 - - VICINITY MAP SCOPE OF WORK LIST OF DRAWINGS 2 - - In St sn I to '4 al N $124th53t2 & co u' co ` � �L ' Duwarfltsh �y A 8 R X I a'< w $ T2% 5y a ae S 130th St SITE C �� m `� .rs P s 0 RtVA!!M . 1 N . ,, m a s4 01 99 §g 5 S 0 9 9� $ < g g Southgate 135tl1 0 oster' m Y. O1 a Park '' S 137 h St Q s 139th St 'r" Riverton Crest n 1LONGITUDE: c tetery 1n St St v. alt em St 1 '� $ 140th St vl Li@e 'y I I c 6 64 < n E g N a `4 D ADDING (1) PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU TO SECTOR "A" ON AN EXISTING RING MOUNT AT CLEARWIRE'S RAD CENTER ON THE EXISTING MONOPOLE. GENERAL ISSUE 1 G-1 COVER SHEET G-2 GENERAL NOTES p p 0 07/06/10 ISSUED FOR PERMIT A 06/16/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW No. Dote Action MORRISON 10900 NE 8TH BELLEVUE, Tel: 425.451.1301 www.morrisonhershfioW.Dom HERSHFIELD STREET, SUITE 810 WA 98004 Fax:425.451.1369 ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT INFORMATION A-0 SITE PLAN A-1 COMPOUND & MOUNT PLANS A-2 TOWER PROFILES, ANTENNA ORIENTATION & DETAILS A-3 RF SYSTEM SCHEDULES & DETAILS O 0 0 PROPERTY SEATTLE SMSA OWNER: LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TOWER OWNER: AMERICAN TOWER LATITUDE: N47 29' 06.2" W122' 16' 39.4" ELEVATION: 26.2'(±) AMSL JURISDICTION: CITY OF TUKWILA TAX PARCEL ID: 7349200345 ZONING CLASS: C/LI APPLICANT: 44AR WIRE 44000 CARILLION POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 PERMITTING CONTACT : JENNIFER TAYLOR REALCOM ASSOCIATES 14432 SE EASTGATE WAY, SUITE 260 BELLEVUE, WA 98007 PHONE : (425) 274-4444 EXT 141 FAX : (425) 274-4449 jtoylor®realcomassoc.com CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE RICK MATTESON PROJECT MANAGER MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION PHONE: (425) 289-5934 ARCHITECT ROBERT JERRY N STATE OF WASHINGTON RA 8259 MORRISON HERSHFIELD PHONE: (954) 577-4655 Client: clear ° o ' 4400 CARILLION POINT KIRKLAND, WA 96033 ELECTRICAL E-1 RF SYSTEM DETAILS 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Project. ATC SOUTHGATE PARK WA-SEA255 13130 44TH AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98168 ALL THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL "8" LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER'S STATION 44+30 ON THE FA LINE SURVEY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY N0.1 (SR99), FOSTER INTERCHANGE TO SOUTH 118TH STREET. AND 435 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY THEREON; SOUTH 26'20' EAST 280 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 30 FEET NORTHWESTERLY WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE RELOC, SOUTH 133RD STREET CENTERLINE OF SAID HIGHWAY PLAN AND THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION; PARCEL 8: LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 5, RIVERTON REPLAT OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS. PAGE(S) 40, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITE DIRECTIONS (FROM KIRKLAND. WA): 1-405 SOUTH TO 1-5. NORTH ON 1-5 TO INTERURBAN AVE. S. EXIT. NORTH ON INTERURBAN AVE. S. TO S. 133rd ST. LEFT ON S. 133rd ST. AND THEN A QUICK RIGHT TURN ONTO 44th AVE. S. AND ANOTHERTHENCE QUICK RIGHT ONTO S. 131st PL. SITE IS BEHIND BUILDING. °rowing Title: COVER SHEET Score: As shown Project No. 810010900 CODE COMPLIANCE Deelgner. R.M. Dote: 06/16/10 ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED 8Y THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES: WASHINGTON STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES WITH THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE CODE: • 2005 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEPA) ��ri��� • 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBCC) • 2006 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC) Zf 71112 OmenIlly:Checked R.M. By: R.L. APPROVALS Project yonoger R.M. Cswst Approval APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE Issue ,o, O Pawing No. G - 1 PROPERTY OWNER CLEARWIRE REPRESENTATIVE : 7 3 4 5 COMMUNITY' DEVELOPMENT 5054. G 0414 15 4)• x Sa" Tr SIE • tqs. GENERAL NOTES LEGEND 1. GENERAL 1. EXAMINE THE SITE CONDITIONS VERY CAREFULLY AND THE SCOPE OF PROPOSED WORK TOGETHER WITH THE WORK OF ALL OTHER TRADES AND INCLUDE IN THE BID PRICE ALL COSTS FOR WORK SUCH AS EQUIPMENT AND WIRING MADE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE SYSTEMS SHOWN AND SYSTEMS OF OTHER TRADES. 2. SUBMITTAL OF BID INDICATES CONTRACTOR IS COGNIZANT OF ALL JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 3. PERFORM DETAILED VERIFICATION OF WORK PRIOR TO ORDERING THE EQUIPMENT AND COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. ISSUE A WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CONSULTANT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 4. OBTAIN ALL PERMITS, PAY ASSOCIATED FEES AND SCHEDULE INSPECTION. 5. PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, INSURANCE, AND SERVICES TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND PRESENT IT AS FULLY OPERATIONAL TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 6. CARRY OUT WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL GOVERNING STATE, COUNTY AND LOCAL CODES AND 0.S.H.A. 7. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK COORDINATE ALL POWER AND TELCO WORK WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY AS IT MAY APPLY TO THIS SITE. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE UTILITIES INVOLVED. 8. FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE COMPLETE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL BE DONE IN A FIRST CLASS WORKMANSHIP PER NECA STANDARD 1-2000 BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL EXPERIENCED IN SUCH WORK AND SHALL SCHEDULE THE WORK IN AN ORDERLY MANNER SO AS NOT TO IMPEDE PROGRESS OF THE PROJECT. 9. DURING PROGRESS OF THE WORK, MAINTAIN AN ACCURATE RECORD OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE SYSTEMS, LOCATING EACH CIRCUIT PRECISELY AND DIMENSIONING EQUIPMENT, CONDUIT AND CABLE LOCATIONS. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, TRANSFER ALL RECORD DATA TO BLACK LINE PRINTS OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS AND SUBMIT THESE DRAWINGS AS RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE CONSULTANT. 10. COMPLETE JOB SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF JOB ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER. ANY WORK, MATERIAL, OR EQUIPMENT FOUND TO BE FAULTY DURING THAT PERIOD SHALL BE CORRECTED AT ONCE UPON WRITTEN NOTIFICATION, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT MANUFACTURER'S PLANS, SHOP DRAWINGS, AND SPECS FOR INDOOR/OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND INSTALLATION. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCESSIBLE AREAS ONLY. 12. COORDINATE EXACT TELEPHONE REQUIREMENTS AND SERVICE ROUTING WITH LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANY. APPLY FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE IMMEDIATELY UPON AWARD OF CONTRACT. 2. BASIC MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE EDITION OF THE NEC ACCEPTED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND TO THE APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS. 2. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE NEW. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE THE STANDARD PRODUCTS OF MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT DESIGN. ANY FIRST-CLASS PRODUCT MADE BY A REPUTABLE MANUFACTURER MAY BE USED PROVIDING IT CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND MEETS THE APPROVAL OF THE CONSULTANT AND THE OWNER. 3. ARRANGE CONDUIT, WIRING, EQUIPMENT, AND OTHER WORK GENERALLY AS SHOWN, PROVIDING PROPER CLEARANCES AND ACCESS. CAREFULLY EXAMINE ALL CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND FIT THE WORK IN EACH LOCATION WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL ALTERATION. WHERE DEPARTURES ARE PROPOSED BECAUSE OF FIELD CONDITIONS OR OTHER CAUSES, PREPARE AND SUBMIT DETAILED DRAWINGS FOR ACCEPTANCE. 4. THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC AND ALL OFFSETS, BENDS, FITTINGS AND ACCESSORIES ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN. PROVIDE ALL SUCH ITEMS AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO FIT THE WORK TO THE CONDITIONS. 5. MAINTAIN ALL CLEARANCES AS REQUIRED BY NEC. 6. SEAL AROUND CONDUITS AND AROUND CONDUCTORS WITHIN CONDUITS ENTERING THE PREFABRICATED SHELTER/CABINETS WHERE PENETRATION OCCURS WITH A SILICONE SEALANT TO PREVENT MOISTURE PENETRATION INTO BUILDING/SHELTER. 7. SILICONE SEAL AROUND ALL BOLTS AND SCREWS USED TO SECURE EQUIPMENT TO EXTERIOR OF BUILDING. 3. RACEWAYS AND BOXES 1. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE UL LABELED. 2. ALL EMPTY CONDUITS INSTALLED FOR FUTURE USE SHALL HAVE A PULL CORD. 3. SHEET METAL BOXES SHALL CONFORM TO NEMA 0S1; CAST -METAL BOXES SHALL CONFORM TO NEMA 81 AND SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. GROUNDING ALL SAFETY GROUNDING OF THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REVISION NEC. 2. ALL GROUND LUG AND COMPRESSION CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COATED WITH ANTI -OXIDANT AGENT, SUCH AS NO -DX, NOALOX, PENETROX OR KOPRSHIELD. 3. GROUND ALL EXPOSED METALLIC OBJECTS ON BUILDING EXTERIOR INCLUDING BUILDING TIE DOWN BRACKETS. 4. PROVIDE LOCK WASHERS FOR ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS FOR GROUND CONDUCTORS. USE STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE THROUGHOUT. 5. DO NOT INSTALL GROUND RING OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY LINE. 6. REMOVE ALL PAINT AND CLEAN ALL DIRT FROM SURFACES REQUIRING GROUND CONNECTIONS, REPAINT TO MATCH AFTER CONNECTION IS MADE TO MAINTAIN CORROSION RESISTANCE. 7. ALL EXTERIOR GROUNDING CONDUCTORS INCLUDING EXTERIOR GROUND RING SHALL BE #2 AWG SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MAKE ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS AS SHORT AND DIRECT AS POSSIBLE. AVOID SHARP BENDS. THE RADIUS OF ANY BEND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 8" AND THE ANGLE OF ANY BEND SHALL NOT EXCEED 90'. GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE ROUTED DOWNWARD TOWARD THE BURIED GROUND RING. 8. BOND ALL EXTERIOR CONDUITS, PIPES AND CYLINDRICAL METALLIC OBJECTS WITH A PENN -UNION GT SERIES CLAMP, BLACKBURN GUV SERIES CLAMP OR A BURNDY GAR 3900BU SERIES CLAMP ONLY, NO SUBSTITUTES ACCEPTED. 9. ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED FOR THE METALS BEING CONNECTED. 10. ALL EXTERNAL GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE EXOTHERMICALLY WELDED. ALL EXOTHERMIC WELDS TO EXTERIOR GROUND RING SHALL BE THE PARALLEL TYPE, EXCEPT FOR THE GROUND RODS WHICH ARE TEE EXOTHERMIC WELDS. REPAIR ALL GALVANIZED SURFACES THAT HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY EXOTHERMIC WELDING. USE SPRAY GALVANIZER SUCH AS HOLUB LECTROSOL #15-501. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER WHEN THE BURIED GROUND RING IS INSTALLED SO THE REPRESENTATIVE CAN INSPECT THE GROUND RING BEFORE IT IS BACKFILLED WITH SOIL. 12. FOR METAL FENCE POST GROUNDING, USE A HEAVY DUTY TYPE GROUNDING CLAMP OR EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTION TO POST. GROUND ALL FENCE POSTS WITHIN 6' OF EQUIPMENT. 13. WHERE MECHANICAL CONNECTORS (TWO -HOLE OR CLAMP) ARE USED, APPLY A LIBERAL PROTECTIVE COATING OF AN ANTI -OXIDE COMPOUND SUCH AS "NO OXIDE A" BY DEARBORN CHEMICAL COMPANY ON ALL CONNECTORS. PROJECT INFORMATION THIS IS AN UNMANNED AND RESTRICTED ACCESS EQUIPMENT AND WILL BE USED FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF RADIO SIGNALS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING PUBLIC BROADBAND SERVICE. NO POTABLE WATER SUPPLY IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THIS LOCATION. NO WASTE WATER WILL BE GENERATED AT THIS LOCATION. NO SOLID WASTE WILL BE GENERATED AT THIS LOCATION. CLEARWIRE MAINTENANCE CREW (TYPICALLY ONE PERSON) WILL MAKE AN AVERAGE OF ONE TRIP PER MONTH AT ONE HOUR PER VISIT. 5. COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE NOTES 1. THE COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE INSTALLER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING AND SUPPLYING CLEARWIRE WITH TYPE -WRITTEN SWEEP TESTS (ANTENNA RETURN LOSS TEST). THIS TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE SPECIFICATIONS AND PARAMETERS OUTLINED BY THE CLEARWIRE RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) ENGINEER. THIS TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF SITE. 2. 3. VAPOR WRAP WILL BE USED TO SEAL ALL CONNECTIONS. ALL COAXIAL CABLE WILL BE GROUNDED PRIOR TO ENTERING THE EQUIPMENT SPACE AND AS SPECIFIED IN THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 4, ALL MAIN TRANSMISSION CABLE WILL BE TERMINATED AT A NEW/EXISTING POLYPHASER SURGE PROTECTOR LOCATED WITH THE EQUIPMENT SPACE. 5. ALL COAXIAL CABLE WILL BE SECURED TO THE DESIGNED SUPPORT STRUCTURE AT DISTANCES NOT TO EXCEED 4'-0" WITH HARDWARE SPECIFIED IN THE COAXIAL CABLE ROUTING DETAILS. 6. ANTENNA CABLE LENGTHS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY OTHERS. CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR FABRICATION DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. ACTUAL ANTENNA CABLE LENGTHS REQUIRED MAY VARY FROM LENGTHS TABULATED. CONTRACTORS MUST FIELD VERIFY ANTENNA CABLE LENGTHS PRIOR TO ORDER. 7. ALL MAIN CABLES WILL BE COLOR CODED AT THREE (3) LOCATIONS: A. AT ANTENNA PRIOR TO JUMPER B. PRIOR TO ENTERING EQUIPMENT CABINET, AT CABLE ENTRY PORT C. INTERIOR SIDE OF EQUIPMENT CABINET, AT CABLE ENTRY PORT 8. ALL MAIN CABLES WILL BE GROUNDED AT: A. AT ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE 8. AT CABLE SUPPORT ASSEMBLY ON ROOF C. PRIOR TO ENTERING EQUIPMENT CABINET 9. ALL TOP JUMPERS WILL BE MADE UP OF 1/2" DIA. LDF. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO MINIMIZE THE LENGTH OF THE JUMPERS. 6. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ❑ SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION ❑ CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS ❑ CONCRETE PLACEMENT AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FOR PROPER PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENTS AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ FOUNDATION EXCAVATION AND FILL INCLUDING UTILITY TRENCHES ❑ CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAD, FOUNDATION AND FILL BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENIGNEER OF THE RECORD ❑ VERIFICATIONS OF MILL REPORT ❑ IDENTIFICATION OF STEEL AND AT JOB SITE ❑ ADHESIVE BOLTS IN CONCRETE OR MASONRY ❑ ANCHOR BOLTS INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT IN CONCRETE ❑ HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING E ALL FIELD WELDING ❑ STRUCTURAL MASONRY SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD, WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THEIR DESIGN AND SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION ce CIRCUIT BREAKER ❑ NON -FUSIBLE DISCONNECT SWITCH FUSIBLE DISCONNECT SWITCH SURFACE MOUNTED PANEL BOAR TD • • TF TRANSFORMER KILOWATT HOUR METER DENOTES CABLE OR CONDUIT TURNING UP IN PLAN VIEW DENOTES CABLE OR CONDUIT TURNING DOWN IN PLAN VIEW DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL OMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. NO VARIATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS 10 WORN SHOWN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE IEVLSION. ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONSS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION. NEITHER MORRISON HERSHFIELD NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL BE PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF TNM PROJECT. JUNCTION BOX PULL BOX TO NEC/TELCO STANDARDS OVERHEAD UTILITIES UNDERGROUND TELCO UNDERGROUND POWER DENOTES REFERENCE NOTE EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTION MECHANICAL CONNECTION (E.G.LUG, C -TAP) GROUND ROD GROUND ROD WITH INSPECTION SLEEVES GROUND BAR PIN AND SLEEVE RECEPTACLE GROUND CONDUCTOR 8259 REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1RTJER0vL*Ra STTE OF 4 OBE JE"Y URA LICENSED ARCHITECT STAT OF WASHINGTON 8259 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 07/06/10 ISSUED FOR PERMIT A 06/16/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW No. Dote Action ABBREVIATIONS AFG AIC BFG C CRGB CU C/W D.T.T. DIA. EC G GE GEC GRC MTS NEC 0/H PDC PVC RNC SCHED SD SE SN TGB TEGB TR TVSS TYP U/G WP W 3 4 ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AMPERE INTERRUPTING CAPACITY BELOW FINISHED GRADE CONDUIT CELL REFERENCE GROUND BAR COPPER COMPLETE WITH DRY TYPE TRANSFORMER DIAMETER EMPTY CONDUIT GROUND GROUNDING ELECTRODE GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR GALVANIZED RIGID CONDUIT MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE OVERHEAD POWER DISTRIBUTION CABINET POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RIGID NON-METALLIC CONDUIT (SCHEDULE 80 PVC) SCHEDULE SERVICE DISCONNECT SWITCH SERVICE ENTRANCE SOLID NEUTRAL TELCO GROUND BAR TOWER EXIT GROUND BAR TRANSFORMER TRANSIENT VOLTAGE SURGE SUPPRESSOR TYPICAL UNDERGROUND WAEC MVO® WEATHERPROOF - NEM WITH Aria it8 201 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT m• MORRISON HERSHFIELD 10900 NE 8TH STREET, SUITE 810 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Tel: 425451.1301 Fax: 425.451.1369 ww W.morrisonhershrield.com Client: clearw're® 4400 CARILLION POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 Project: ATC SOUTHGATE PARK WA-SEA255 13130 44TH AVE S SEATTLE. WA 98168 Drawing Title: GENERAL NOTES 5 Scale: As shown Project No. 810010900 Omicron R.M. Dote: 06/16/10 Drown Ely: R.M. Checked Ely: R.L. Project Monger. R.M. Ment Approval Issue No. 0 Drawing No. G-2 \ \ .\ N \� \. .\ \•. \. •\ \\v \ \ \ \ .N, `\ \ \ s ;;� \"\ / sr. \ N. / \• \'\. . PARCEL # 2513200134 PARCEL # 7349200340 EXISTING CLEARWIRE LEASE AREA / (0) UTILITY FRAME (POWER AND TELCO SOURCE) / LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL "B" LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER'S STATION 44+30 ON THE FA LINE SURVEY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY N0.1 (SR99), FOSTER INTERCHANGE TO SOUTH 118TH STREET. AND 435 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY THEREON; THENCE SOUTH 26'20' EAST 280 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 30 FEET NORTHWESTERLY WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE RELOC, SOUTH 133RD STREET CENTERLINE OF SAID HIGHWAY PLAN AND THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION; PARCEL B: LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 5, RIVERTON REPLAT OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, FOSTORIA 00 NOT SCALE ORAWNGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL ME DINSIONS AND ADWOR SE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRS DR SS OMIIONS. NO VARIATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS TO WORK 5NOWN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN L. APPROVAALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. ALL DRAWWGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION. NEITHER MORRISON HERSHFIELD NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL BE PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS. PAGE(S) 40, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXISTING PROPERTY LINES (TYP) \ EXISTING CARRIER SHELTER / \ \ \ f (12 2� \ as �9_, • \ ti EXISTING \ SITE COMPOUND EXISTING 120'-0" MONOPOLE �... \ �- . PARCEL #7349200345`, USE: COMMERCIAL/LIGHT) ‘�„ INDUSTRIAL ., ,÷0 -' ZONE: C/LI /,� /QUO ' (3 4D, / ACCESS DRIVE ---� EXISTING SITE SITE PLAN 1" = 20'-0" (BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 1" = 40'-0" (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) RECENFO 8259 REGISTERED ARCHITECT ROBERT JERRY LARl1 HINGlO STATE OF 4 OBE JE Y URA LICENSED ARCHITECT STAT OF WASHINGTON 8259 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 07/06/10 ISSUED FOR PERMIT A 06/16/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW No. Dote Action I MORRISON HERSHFIELD 10900 NE 8TH STREET, SUITE 810 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Tel: 425A51.1301 Fax: 425.451.1369 www.morrisonhershrield.GDm Client: clear 0 4400 CARILLION POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 8 Project: ATC SOUTHGATE PARK WA-SEA255 13130 44TH AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98168 Drawing Title: SITE PLAN Scale: As shown Project No. 810010900 Designer: R.M. Doti 06/16/10 &owe e R.M. Checked Br R.L. Project Momper. R.M. Mull Approval Issue No. 0 Drawing No. A-0 1 2 3 4 5mie 6 010' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SCALE S DSC NI tr Sa" b- 0 c p A EXISTING RRU UNIT EXISTING MOUNT PIPE EXISTING CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA EXISTING EXISTING RING MOUNT CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA EXISTING MOUNT ELEV. 1/2" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 1/4" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) EXISTING PANEL ANTENNA EXISTING 2-3/8" GALV. SCHED 40 PIPE TO REMAIN — (TYP OF 3) EXISTING RRU UNIT TO REMAIN (TYP OF 2) EXISTING RING MOUNT TO BE REUSED EXISTING CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA. ON (0) RING MOUNT (TYP. OF 2) PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTED ON (E) PIPE & RING MOUNT (1YP. OF 1) PROPOSED RRU UNIT MOUNTED ON (E) PIPE & RING MOUNT (TYP. OF' 1) EXISTING MONOPOLE PROPOSED MOUNT ELEV. 1/2" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 1/4" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) EXISTING 2-3/8"0 STD PIPE EXISTING MOUNT PLAN. EXISTING CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNAS EXISTING RING MOUNT EXISTING MONOPOLE 1" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 1/2" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) PROPOSED DOUBLE ANTENNA MOUNT. SEE DETAIL E/A-2 EXISTING RING MOUNT TO REMAIN EXISTING MONOPOLE PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA (SECTOR A) DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS OR OIASSIONS. NO VARIATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS TO WORN SHOWN SHALL BE PPLEMENTEO WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS ORIIWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION. NEITHER MORRISON HERSHFIELD NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL BE PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. EXISTING CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON (E) RING MOUNT (TYP. OF 2) EXISTING CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA TO BE RELOCATED TO NEW MOUNT PROPOSED MOUNT PLAN. 1-1/2" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 3/4" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) 8259 REGISTERED ARCHITECT ROBERT JERRYLARA STATE OF 4 OBE JE Y URA LICENSED ARCHITECT STAT OF WASHINGTON 8259 6 5 4 • • • // • • • R • /• . Qa .4 •4 P O •4 44 44* EXISTING \ ICE BRIDGE \ EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TRUE NORTH 0' wee dre •\ o�` 11 IL. .4. 4444.44••4••4• EXISTING CARRIER EQUIPMENT PAD & QUIPMENT Ay, ver• . •el N. Iln m n co 0 EXISTING METER S 11 EXISTING MONOPO 9' C EXISTING CLEARWIRE CABINET NOTE: NO CHANGES TO EQUIPMENT/ \ CABINET ON THE \ 0" \ELECTRICGROUNDAC SERVICE O 4• 444. EXISTING CARRIER \• E QUIPMENT SHELTER N. c" /�. \ao I�4 •�F'p \t� 4.4 ?Vis• , ti EXISTING CHAIN LINK ACCESS GATE COMPOUND PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 1/8" = 1-0" (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) r�/j. EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE (TYP) 2 3 4 RECEVED AS ME COMMUNiTY 5 DEVELOPAf,E? peol 0 su E I F.1T' x 3 2 1 0 07/06/10 ISSUED FOR PERMIT A 06/16/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW No. Dote Action m' MORRISON HERSHFIELD 10900 NE 8TH STREET, SUITE 810 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Tel: 425.451.1301 Fax: 425.451.1369 W Ww.mortisonhershfield.com Client: clear 4400 CARILLION POINT KIRKLAND. WA 98033 w Project: ATC SOUTHGATE PARK WA-SEA255 13130 44TH AVE S SEATTLE. WA 98168 Drowing Title: COMPOUND MOUNT PLANS Scale: As shown Project No. 810010900 Designer: R.M. Dote: 06/16/10 Drown By: R.M. Checked 8y: R.L. Project Yonooer•. R.M. Mont Approval Issue No. 0 Drawing No. A-1 PROPOSED 2" SCHED. 40 ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE (TYP OF 2) DOUBLE ANTENNA MOUNT BY ANDREW MODEL #DA -C200 OR APPROVED EQUALTO 1P\ ANTENNA MOUNT DETAIL 1191NOT -' i Id__' ic•7�. 'icl,�%-, ASS „- EXISTING PIPE MOUNT REMAIN _ - I 00 NOT SCALE OMW WGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DDAEPSIONLR AND ACME CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. NO VARIATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS ro WORK SHOWN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTEDWRNOU1 PRIOR WFUTTEN APPROVAL. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED 81 THE LATEST REVISION. ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION. NEITHER MORRISON HERSHFIELD NOR 11-10 ARCHITECT WILL BE PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. 3\O EXISTING ANTENNA INFORMATION BACKHAUL DISH ANTENNAS INFORMATION SECTOR ANTENNA MODEL QTY. AZIMUTH IN DEGREES RADIATION CENTER DESTINATION ANTENNA MODEL SIZE QTY. ZIMUTH INADEGREES RADIATION CE ALPHA - RED KATHREIN 840 10054 1 60' 105' WA-SEA254 ANDREW PX2F-52 2' 1 EXISTINGZ (-30,)\:. BETA - BLUE KATHREIN 840 10054 1 180' 105' \` rp N, GAMMA — YELLOW KATHREIN 840 10054 1 300' 105' 8259 REGISTERED ARCHITECT JERLARA XNG TON 4t OBE JE- -YSTATE ARCHITECT LICENSED ARCHITECT 8259 NOTE: REFER TO SHEET A-3 FOR PROPOSED ANTENNA INFORMATION NOTE: NO CHANGES TO THE EXISTING DISH ANTENNAS WILL BE MADEEEO EXISTING RF SYSTEM AND BACKHAUL SCHEDULE TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 6 - - 120' - 0" 120' - 0" #2 STRANDED GROUND LEAD ATTACHED TO PIPE W/ EXOTHERMIC WELD 5 - _ 4 - - 3 - - TOP OF TOWER 105'-0" t C.L. OF (E) _�-Ilk- PROPOSED 2" SCHED. 40 ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE TOP OF TOWERPROPOSED 105'-O" t C.L. OF (E) CLEARWIRE ANTENNA & RRU UNIT 2 - 1 - - 0 07/06/10 ISSUED FOR PERMIT ANTENNAS ABOVE GRADE 101'-O"± C.L. OF (E) EXISTING ANTENNAS ABOVE GRADE ILLI 101' -0"± C.L. OF (E) EXISTING NEW A 06/16/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW No. Date Action CLEARWIRE MW DISHES ABOVE GRADE CLEARWIRE COAX EXISTING CARRIER ANTENNAS PROPOSED (3) 516 UNES INSIDE POLE EXISTING CLEARWIRE CABINET NOTE: NO CHANGES TO EQUIPMENT CABINET ON THE GROUND OR ELECTRICAL SERVICE 7 -EXISTING CARRIER SHELTER CLEARWIRE MW DISHES ABOVE GRADE CLEARWIRE COAX EXISTING CARRIER ANTENNAS CLEARWIRE ANTENNA Ii :: MORRISON 10900 NE 8TH BELLEVUE. Tel: 425.451.1301 www.morrisonhershfeld.com NI HERSHFIELD STREET, SUITE 810 WA 98004 Fax: 425.451.1369 EXISTING CLEARWIRE :. JUMPER (TY (TYP. OF 2) NEW HUAWEI RRU UNIT — SEE NOTES Client: clear ° re 4400 CARILLION POINT WA 98033 CABINET NOTE: NO CHANGES TO EQUIPMENT CABINET ON THE GROUND ORKIRKLAND, ELECTRICAL SERVICEII EXISTING PROPOSED DC POWER CABLE PROPOSED FlBE 1 ill 1-3 Project: ATC SOUTHGATE PARK W0 44TH AVE//EXISTING 55 13130 44TH VE S SEATTLE, WA 98166 CARRIER SHELTER CABLEOP ii_ 111'11 ii_ fin'ii Drawing Title: ANTENNA ORIENTATION & MOUNT DETAILS ti e00PROPOSED TOWER PROFILERADIO 11 EXISTING TOWER PROFILE NOTES: 1. SEE HUAWEI RRU INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOUNTING DETAILS. 2. REFER TO CLEARWIRE RF SHEET FOR RRU UNIT OPTIONAL LOCATION. 3. IF PROPOSED CLEARWIRE ANTENNA IS TO BE MOUNTED ON A NEW OR EXISTING PIPE ON AN EXISTING ANTENNA MOUNT, CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CLEARANCE OF NEW/EXISTING PIPE FOR DAP INSTALLATION BEHIND PROPOSED ANTENNA. IF THERE IS NO Aso"' Shown No. 81001 9 8100109 R.M.at.: 1 0 ® 1/16" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 1/32" = 1 -0 (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) AVAILABLE SPACE, EXISTING PIPE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH NEW PIPE. NEW PIPES LENTH SHALL BE 8' 0" MINIMUM, AND DAP RADIO SHALL BE MOUNTED BELOW PROPOSED CLEARWIRE ANTENNA. COORDINATE WITH CLEARWIRE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IN FIELD. 1/16" = 1'-0" (BASED ON 22" x 34" PAPER) 1/32" = 1'-O" (BASED ON 11" x 17" PAPER) ---- Drawn 8y: R.M. Checked 8y: R.L NOTES: NO WORK SHALL COMMENCE WITHOUT THE APPROVED STRUCTURAL TOWER/ANTENNA ANALYSIS REPORT (SIGNED AND SEALED) PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE COVER. CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SHALL REVIEW THE APPROVED TOWER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SUPPLIED BY CLEARWIRE AND MODIFY, IF REQUIRED, ALL APPLICABLE MEMBERS AS INDICATED IN CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL REPORT PRIOR TO INCERNOT PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA MOUNT DETAIL R.M.Mo^Ogg R. Client Approval Issue No. Q 1 ISN. /\ Drawing No. /� _ �i r1 L a ,. ['Saw' INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS AND COAX CABLES. el TO SCALE RV 0 PROPOSED ANTENNA INFORMATION SECTOR ANTENNA MODEL QTY, AZIMUTH IN DEGREES RADIATION CENTER SECTOR A - RED KATHREIN 840 10054 1 60' 105' GPS ANTENNA LOCATION OPTIONS: (1) CABLE BRIDGE MAST (2) EQUIPMENT CABINET (3) H -FRAME, COORDINATE WITH CLEARWIRE & MANAGER IN FIELD LABEL MARKINGS SHOULD BE PLACED AT: (1) WITHIN 12" OF CABLE AT BOTH ENDS (2) AT OR NEAR TOWER MGB (3) EITHER PRIOR TO ENTRY INTO THE CABINET OR CABLE SUPPORT BRIDGE (4) BOTTOM OF ANTENNA MAST PIPES NOTES: 1. COORDINATE RF ANTENNA INSTALLATION WITH LATEST MARKET RF DESIGN. PROPOSED RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. DO NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO GROUND BAR. 2. GROUNDING KIT SHALL BE TYPE AND PART NUMBER AS SUPPLIED OR RECOMMENDED BY CABLE MANUFACTURER. 3. WEATHERPROOFING SHALL BE TYPE AND PART NUMBER AS SUPPLIED OR RECOMMENDED BY CABLE MANUFACTURER. ANTENNA CABLE WEATHERPROOFING KIT (SEE NOTE 3) CABLE GROUND KIT #6 AWG STRANDED CU WIRE WITH GREEN, 600V, THWN INSULATION (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) (SEE NOTES 1 & 2) CONNECTION OF GROUND KIT TO ANTENNA CABLE NOT TO SCALE K ATH EI El i1_ SCALA DIVISION 1(017)001 801611 XX9WarI204 849r61abb OIOCmL0) 40161•/1 0)00003 0031 004 4=321 810 061710 =Dr 0100.0)00(340 POIOrm3OW. 0050364 for IMMO 0991180110111, B 521940 0r2u001000 43005a320 4008021 OM 00 ON )516 11405000 � 03=05217 romp the 0 -IP 003140 Olga. AAlZ4rwm3 De male by hand 0r N01 ON ICS Of On 0{5080) RC!) (Ruroro COMM U181)11181 MN N0 00)4 0333)004 On ROM Nen 0.0100 A180 1.1 a 3GPP0AI50 2.03)30000 (me eepamb 4010 Sheol 66010116). • DC Grounded mot= patio. IlrpN<Ott0111454 1. • No 100419 OINIDANCOMNICAMIL 6PxntaDaN ROC4¢M1y Ryle ERN 6M6a 206-2JOKH2 201603 6001.6 06WR 00Mm00ub0 , (210021 P9adam= R4n1050 0457 <1.6.1 PRY< -160 dBc N6' and 45• 0430070. Wren. RON Mar 3748.111 Ira 60'C) .46. and GoisManan MORA . et* 30004 (lad wan AST and AV TMom=a1650Ulan NUN) Ne E00338000000 0-10066pm edmw6Y.m644 Connor. 9*Mx.06pmdbn0 01:161..) dap Ml= P r 1P 16 15Y 15 15 00 (50000 Made Im214cn 16 dB WWI., NIMI 1003 116= al? MP Kim 7.1 CBI 612• Dr. Moron lWO, 23003 wet., 200113.04) .7.74000 42314.7.2.600100 (10070323.71 run) 2.-80 Dad 040081121 1(110 FroMSNaAOr 113.121.11170 )SOU M 024000152A N) Wind survival ram. 160 non (3a 606 Smoot o 3nNJ6NN 3x37 11 50001000/) Mooning 0063141 F64d110 Omani apa na NO MM.,IN26676 45001450401 OpnuW. Soo "Is IN WYNNatM. • 180cronta d0N9+b5u0]0naMa0MINAMd 3emF,Itnd 61114- 222.0.2 (60 E m aSCO n a 0)1-1wItch d)2.4.Nave rneN WARN See Ne Eno...Newnn NPN m6b1b loner dates. •• For ardsnna m.y. MIP 6109Y3.mN731506 NA.. NNW 12 rectured). 11210. 840100548 87° XX-pol Panel Antenna 2496-2690 MHz 00123tra gundrn o05•.54000mn 00800140000 a4601 0000m 8061.0000040 P 040103100)79 NNIID7YNpN10m WEN caLMM Nr-551U6NM 440.40653430 6• aloartol 00160 6•01eOO damal 010100750330* WTal Damn N5'-005)6)./1, N5t338mlln 1P.IFCO0M dor. tr °WREN down111 00046 M0.. 0uaga50833, P.M., Dm 4563 10 0447601 RISK 5331/1154 0 T704500 0*)54117703601 E .m0NaiG1a00Is.02lwa 50Om0t Nww.uNah0a6,vu K LITH Il EI O SCALA DIVISION N Ste~ 1 2 x 738 546 Mounting Kit 850 10013 Tilt Kit Mounting (MUNI. Mal OmcriM n 2.774646 46014013TO (5080) 50410 ODtm13.2641 9.Yon a�0 80,020736546na1'e3010 0-15 degas, Nei.. NEN. Or00, n10mINMn: WNW DmcrEnon 640100619 *03000, 7.10 DN 100soC.o 840 10054B 870 XX-pol Panel Antenna 2496-2690 MHz 2.025 014104 0 0.125 (66mm4) r` 42 04Ka (1067 non) 44.1 104104 1120 mm) 45.3 . 55 (1151 mm) I F 12.7 hobos 1 2.8 0400 (00 mm) 3.916)3002 (71 min) (96 non) EmI Tali-A4p00left 3p nod 318-==01 058020000090 6609..1000005 WOW N.0Ra0 AO epewod100 mB tabled to change 000.1)1006. T10 0116616poottipOa0 Ow m•053a 0100k410WL0t1NOm. 000000100., 04. mew 000000 Bat 4680 640073. 018601 (OSA) Foran 164117703600 03001641)110.4>10) Emxiawmmentono003OFo6UaN Nom00 NNr.kenrdn.S.mm ANTENNA DATA SHEET NOT TO SCALE DO NOT SCALE DRAWNGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANT ERRORS 00 OMISSIONS. NO VARIATIONS OR MODIRCATI0N5 TO WORN SHOWN SHALL BE MPLEMENTEO WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED ST THE LATEST REVISION. ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESTA. THE PROPERTY OF MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION. NEITHER AIORRISON HERSHFIELD NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL BE PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT 8259 REGISTERED ARCHITECT ROBERTJERRY LARA 4O STATE OF NNGTON DE JE --Y LARA LICENSED ARCHITECT STAT OF WASHINGTON 8259 6 5 4 3 2 1 - 0 07/06/10 ISSUED FOR PERMIT A 06/16/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW No. Dote Action • MORRISON HERSHFIELD 10900 NE 8TH STREET, SUITE 810 BELLEVUE. WA 98004 Tel: 425.451.1301 Fax: 425.451.1369 www.morrisonhershfield.com 14.7" 00IIIIIIIII@ 0�8 IIIIIIIIIIII111IIII --0 ,J U U UUU‘ ctO O < O 04 0 U U U U l_ a - o) RRU SPECIFICATIONS NOT TO SCALE MANUFACTURER: HUAWEI PART # RRU3702 LENGTH: 19" WIDTH: 14.7" DEPTH: 6.2" WEIGHT: 44 LBS R C VED 06 HVE Client: clear 0 4400 CARILLION POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 Project: ATC SOUTHGATE PARK WA-SEA255 13130 44TH AVE S SEATTLE. WA 98168 Drawing Title: RF SYSTEM SCHEDULES AND DETAILS v 5 Scale: As shown Project No. 810010900 Designer: R.M. Dote: 06/16/10 Drown 191: R.M. Chrome 9y: R.L. Project Monocle.. R.M. Client Approval issue Na. O Drawing No. A-3 1 2 3 4 5 COMMUNIT' OEVELOPffE T 0 SL+LF SNN 6 tP31- TY ,17 A fn11N1rNT SPFrrDI•ATe1AIC• 1) BINOCULARS OR SPOTTING SCOPE, COMPASS, TELESCOPIC ANTENNA POINTING DEVICE. SURVEYOR'S MAP, INCUNOMETER AND DECLINATION INFORMATION FROM MAGNETIC NORTH. 2) TRANSMISSION UNE TEST EQUIPMENT; MAY BE EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING TEST EQUIPMENT SUITES BUT MUST MATE WITH BOTH N -TYPE AND DIN -TYPE CONNECTORS 3) PRECISION N -TYPE TERMINATIONS FOR TEST EQUIPMENT CAUBRATION A) MATCHED LOAD (50 OHM TERMINATION AT PCS/ESMR FREOUENCIES) B) SHORT LOAD C) OPEN LOAD 4) PLOTTER/PRIMER OR LAPTOP PC WITH CABUNG 5) PRECISION DIN -TYPE TERMINATIONS FOR SWEEP TESTS A) 7/16 DIN PRECISION SHORT TERMINATION 6) 7/16 DIN PRECISION OPEN TERMINATION C) 7/16 01N PRECISION MATCHED LOAD TERMINATION 6) N TYPE PRECISION SHORT TERMINATION (AT GPS FREQUENCIES) 7) TOROUE WRENCH WITH INCREMENTS DOWN TO 5 IN -LBS (NOTE: WHEN USING THE ANRITSU SITE MASTER YOU MUST BEWARE OF WHAT YOU HAVE THE SITE MASTER MODE SET-UP TO MEASURE. IF THE SITE MASTER MODE IS SET-UP TO MEASURE RETURN LOSS YOU MUST DIVIDE THE PEAK AND VALLEY MEASUREMENTS BY (4) TO GET THE CORRECT INSERTION LOSS. IF THE SITE MASTER MODE IS SET-UP TO MEASURE CABLE LOSS YOU MUST DIVIDE THE PEAK AND VALLEY MEASUREMENTS BY (2) TO GET THE CORRECT INSERTION LOSS. THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR RL OF EACH CABLE ASSEMBLY (JUMPER, OR MAIN LINE) IS PROVIDED BELOW: 1) CONVERT ALL COMPONENTS VSWR'S TO REFLECTION COEFFICIENT:\ REFF COEFF (VSWR-1)/(VSWR+1) 2) CALCULATE FEEDER ATTENUATION FACTOR: ATT FACTOR - EXP( -(ATTENUATION (DB/100FT)•LENGTH (FT)/434.3) 3) COLLECT CONTRIBUTING REFLECTIONS AT BOTTOM OF SYSTEM 4) MULTIPLY REFLECTION COEFFICIENTS OF TOP COMPONENTS BY ATTENUATION FACTOR FROM STEP 2 5) REFLECTION COEFFICIENTS OF BOTTOM COMPONENTS ARE UNCHANGED 6) DETERMINE RSS (ROOT SUM OF THE SQUARES) OF REFLECTIONS FROM STEP 3 RFF = (REF1-2+REF2-2+REF3-2+ )-.5 7) CALCULATE EXPECTED SYSTEM VSWR AND RETURN LOSS: VSWR - (1+RFF)/(1-RFF) RET LOSS = -20.106 10(655) TEST EQUIPMENT SUITES OPTION AOPTION B WILTRON SITEMASTER 5331 CABLE AND ANTENNA ANALYZER OR EQUIVALENT EQUIPMENT SPECTRUM ANALYZER WITH PLOT STORAGE CAPABILITY (800MHz-2.1 GHz RANGE) OR APPROVED EOUAL SPECTRUM ANALYZER (FOR PORT -TO -PORT TESTING) SIGNAL GENERATOR (800MHz-2.1 GHz RANGE) SIGNAL GENERATOR (FOR PORT -TO -PORT TESTING) DIRECTIONAL COUPLER (40 d8 DIRECTIVITY OR BETTER) EITHER FFT CAPABILITY FOR THE SPECTRUM ANALYZER OR TDR EQUIPMENT STIEEP TEST PROCETLIRE• PREWINAR'I VISUAL 16PEC1ION PRIOR TO TRANSMISSION UNE TESTING, A VISUAL INSPECTION IS TO BE PERFORMED TO VERIFY THAT THE CELL SITE IS PROPERLY CONFIGURED AND READY FOR SWEEP TESTING. THIS INSPECTION VERIFIES THAT PROPER TRANSMISSION LINE CABLES ARE INSTALLED, THAT ALL JUMPERS HAVE BEEN CONNECTED, AND THAT THE CABLES HAVE NO NOTICEABLE STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS. TEST PREPARATION VERIFY THAT ALL TEST PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT ARE PRESENT, INCLUDING TOWER CREW FOR ANTENNA MAST ACCESS. TESTING SEOUENCE 1) VERIFY THAT THE CORRECT BOTTOM JUMPER IS PRESENT (IF APPUCABLE) AND OF THE PROPER LENGTH AND NOTE IN THE CHECK OFF SHEET 2) VERIFY THAT THE CORRECT TOP JUMPER IS PRESENT (IF APPLICABLE) AND OF THE PROPER LENGTH AND NOTE IN THE CHECK -OFF SHEET. 3) VISUALLY CHECK FOR ANY EXCESSIVE JUMPER STRESS CAUSED BY THE BEND RADIUS AT OTHER TOP OR BOTTOM JUMPER, AND NOTE ANY PROBLEMS IN THE CHECK -OFF SHEET. 4) VERIFY THAT THE CORRECT ANTENNA(5) ARE INSTALLED FOR EACH SECTOR. 5) VISUALLY VERIFY THAT CONNECTIONS BETWEEN JUMPERS AND MAIN FEED LINE ARE MATED. 6) VISUALLY CHECK FOR DENTS, KINKS, OR OTHER OBVIOUS STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS WITH THE FEED -LINE OR JUMPERS. EXIT CRITERIA VERIFY THAT THE CABLE AND ANTENNA ARE PROPERTY INSTALLED AND FREE FROM ANY OBVIOUS DEFECTS. !EEO NYE AMFRTON I OSS TFCT• TEST THE INSERTION LOSS VALUES ARE TO BE OBTAINED OVER THE ENTIRE BLOCK ASSIGNED FREQUENCY RANGE (TO AVOID RE -CALIBRATION FOR DISTANCE -TO -FAULT TEST). TEST PREPARATION 1) INSTALL A 7/16 DIN SHORTED LOAD INTO THE CONNECTOR AT THE ANTENNA END OF THE TRANSMISSION FEED LINE TOP JUMPER. 2) VERIFY THE TORQUE SETTING OF THE FEED UNE CONNECTOR WITH THE SHORTED LOAD MATCHES THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3) SET THE TEST EQUIPMENT TO SWEEP THE FREQUENCY RANGE IN USE IN YOUR MARKET. 4) IF THE FIELD ENGINEER PREFERS, THE TOWER GROUNDING AND THE FEED -UNE GROUNDING CAN BE DONE AT THIS POINT. THIS STEP IS THE FIELD ENGINEER'S PREROGATIVE. 5) SET TRANSMIT POWER TO TEST EOUIPMENT DEFAULT 6) CALIBRATE THE TEST EQUIPMENT ACCORDING TO TEST EOUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S EQUIPMENT. 7) VERIFY THAT THE DISPLAY WILL SHOW INSERTION LOSS (CALLED CABLE LOSS ON THE SITE MASTER); OR MEASURE RETURN LOSS THEN DIVIDE BY 2. 8) CONNECT THE TEST EQUIPMENT TO THE BOTTOM JUMPER'S CONNECTOR AND ADJUST TO THE PROPER TOROUE SETTING. (SEE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION) 9) PERFORM SETUP AND MEASUREMENTS FOR ALL REMAINING TRANSMISSION LINES. DDT Canna ALL TRANSMISSION LINES IN ALL SECTORS HAVE INSERTION LOSS LESS THAN OR EOUAL TO THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE THRESHOLD. BOTTOM JUMPER. MAIN FEEDUNE' TOP JUMPER: CABLE ATTEN. CABLE LENGTH INSERTION LOSS (dB/FT) (FT) (dB) # CONNECTOR PAIRS BOTTOM JUMPER MAIN FEEDUNE LOSS (dB) LOSS (48) ATTEN. PER PAIR (dB) 0.14 INSERTION LOSS (dB) TOP JUMPER CONNECTOR MAX. INSERTION LOSS (dB) LOSS (dB) LOSS (dB) IF TOP AND BOTTOM JUMPERS ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO YOUR CABLE CONFIGURATION. ENTER (0) LOSS FOR THESE O I DST -TO-F nT TEST• ANY DISCONTINUITY (CONNECTOR CONTACT. KINKED CABLE, DAMAGED CABLE, OR OTHER ANOMALY) IN A TRANSMISSION CABLE RESULTS IN THE REFLECTION OF SOME OF THE TRANSMITTED POWER. THIS REFLECTION IS A LOSS OF THE INTENDED TRANSMIT POWER AND IS CALLED THE RETURN LOSS" BY MEASURING THE TINE REOUIRED FOR THE SIGNAL TO TRAVEL TO THE POINT OF ANOMALY AND BACK, ONE CAN DETERMINE THE ANOMALY'S DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF ORIGINATION OF THE SIGNAL THE RETURN LOSS VALUES OF THE FEED UNE COMPONENTS ARE TO BE OBTAINED OVER THE ENTIRE BLOCK ASSIGNED FREQUENCY BAND. THIS TEST USES DISTANCE TO FAULT MEASUREMENTS TO DETERMINE THE RETURN LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH CONNECTOR PAIR AND CABLE COMPONENT OF THE TRANSMISSION FEED UNE. THESE VALUES SHOULD BE REFERENCED TO THE THRESHOLD VALUES LISTED BLOW. IF THE VALUE OF THE RETURN LOSS DOES NOT MEET THIS VALUE, THEN THE APPLICABLE ANTENNA TRANSMISSION LINE SYSTEM FAILS. BY USING THIS TEST THE SUSPECT COMPONENT CAN BE LOCATED AND CORRECTED. THE DTF MEASUREMENT CAN THEN BE REPEATED TO VERIFY ADHERENCE TO SPECIFICATIONS. ENTRANCE CRITERIA - PASSED PRELIMINARY VISUAL INSPECTION - PASSED FEED LINE INSERTION LOSS TEST TEST PREPARATION 1) INSTALL A 7/16 DIN 50_MATCHED LOAD INTO THE CONNECTOR AT THE ANTENNA END OF TRANSMISSION FEED LINE TOP JUMPER 2) VERIFY THE TOROUE SENTING OF THE FEED UNE CONNECTOR WITH THE MATCHED LOAD MATCHES THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 3) SET THE TEST EQUIPMENT FREOUENCY SWEEP RANGE FOR THE ASSIGNED FREQUENCY BAND USED IN THE MARKET. ENSURE THAT THE TRANSMITTED SWEEP FALLS WITHIN THE AUTHORIZED BAND FOR THE MARKET. FREQUENCIES USED ARE MHZ OTHER FUTURE FREOUENCIES THAT REQUIRE SWEEPING ARE_ MHZ 4) CAUBRATE THE TEST EQUIPMENT ACCORDING TO TEST EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S EQUIPMENT 5) VERIFY THAT THE TEST EQUIPMENT IS CONFIGURED TO MEASURE DISTANCE TO FAULT 6) CONNECT THE TEST EQUIPMENT TO THE BOTTOM JUMPER'S CONNECTOR AND ADJUST TO THE PROPER TOROUE SETTING TESTING SEOMENCE NOTE MEASUREMENTS OF THE RETURN LOSS AND THE DISTANCE CORRESPONDING TO EACH CONNECTOR PAIR. ALSO NOTE THE LOWEST RETURN LOSS VALUE AND CORRESPONDING DISTANCE FOR EACH CABLE (WHERE PRACTICAL; USUALLY CABLES >=6'-0' IN LENGTH). IF THE MEASURED RETURN LOSS FOR ANY COMPONENT I5 LESS THAN THE APPROPRIATE VALUE FROM THE TABLE BELOW. THE TEST HAS FAILED. REPLACE ANY FAILED COMPONENTS ANO RE -TEST THE TRANSMISSION LINE FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE ATP. PERFORM THE SETUP AND MEASUREMENTS FOR ALL REMAINING UNES DIT CRITERIA ALL TRANSMISSION LINE COMPONENTS IN ALL SECTORS HAVE RETURN LOSS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE THRESHOLD. MINIMUM COMPONFNT RETURN IOSS VAI IIFS COMPONENT RETURN L055 (dB( CONNECTORS 2 30 CABLE 2 45 AMTDwIA Sup[TC1EY RETURN NMS TEST. THE RETURN LOSS VALUES OF THE ANTENNA SUBSYSTEM COMPONENT (NOT TO INCLUDE TRANSMISSION FEED LINE CONTRIBUTIONS) ARE TO BE OBTAINED FOR THE COMPANY'S ASSIGNED FREQUENCIES IN YOUR MARKET. THESE VALUES SHOULD BE REFERENCED TO THE THRESHOLD VALUES CALCULATED FOR YOUR SPECIFIC ANTENNA. IF THE VALUE OF THE RETURN LOSS IS LESS THAN THE THRESHOLD VALUE, THEN THE ANTENNA FAILS AND NEEDS TO 8E ANALYZED AND CORRECTED BEFORE REPEATING THIS TEST. THIS TEST MUST BE REPEATED FOR EACH CARRIER FREQUENCY IN USE AT THE SITE. ENTRANCE CRITERIA VERIFY THAT THE FREOUENCY CHANNELS ARE CLEAR BY REFERENCING THE ANTENNA SWEEP ANALYSIS FOR YOUR MARKET BY CONTACTING RF ENGINEERING. - PASSED PREUMINARY VISUAL INSPECTION - PASSED FEED LINE INSERTION LOSS TEST - PASSED FEED UNE DISTANCE -TO -FAULT TEST TEST PREPARATION - BIS RECEIVE FREOUENCY TEST CONNECT THE TEST EQUIPMENT TO THE BOTTOM JUMPER'S CONNECTOR AND ADJUST TO THE PROPER TORQUE SETTING. (SEE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION) SET THE TEST EOUIPMENT FREQUENCY SWEEP RANGE TO THE BASE STATION RECEIVE FREQUENCIES USED IN YOUR MARKET. 1) CAUBRATE THE TEST EQUIPMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE END OF THE TOP JUMPER ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. (CALIBRATE WITH AN OPEN. SHORT AND 50 OHM LOAD) 2) VERIFY THAT THE DISPLAY WILL SHOW RETURN LOSS VALUES. 3) REMOVE THE CAUBRATION LOAD FROM THE TOP JUMPER CONNECTOR AND CONNECT THE ANTENNA TO THE FEED LINE TOP JUMPER. 4) VERIFY THE TOROUE SETTING OF THE FEED LINE CONNECTOR WITH THE ANTENNA MATCHES THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. TEST EOIIPNENT CONNECTION TESTING SEQUENCE - BTS RECEIVE FREQUENCY TESTS TAKE MEASUREMENT OF THE LOWEST RETURN LOSS VALUE OVER THE FREOUENCY BAND AND RECORD THE VALUE. IF THE MEASURED RETURN LOSS FOR THE ANTENNA IS LESS THAN THE THRESHOLD VALUE CALCULATED. THEN THE TEST HAS FAILED. TEST PREPARATION - EQS TRANSMIT FREQUENCY TESTS 1) SET THE TEST EQUIPMENT FREQUENCY SWEEP RANGE TO THE BASE STATION TRANSMIT FREQUENCIES USED IN YOUR MARKET. 2) SET TRANSMIT POWER TO TEST EQUIPMENT DEFAULT. 3) CAUBRATE THE TEST EQUIPMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE END OF THE TOP JUMPER ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. (CAUBRATE WITH AN OPEN, SHORT, AND 50 OHM LOAD). 4) VERIFY THAT THE DISPLAY WILL SHOW RETURN LOSS. TESTING SEQUENCE - 815 TRAIGNIT FREOUENCY TESTS TAKE MEASUREMENT OF THE LOWEST RETURN LOSS VALUE OVER THE FREOUENCY BAND AND RECORD THE VALUE IN THE PROVIDED WORKSHEET IF THE MEASURED RETURN LOSS FOR THE ANTENNA IS LESS THAN THE THRESHOLD VALUE CALCULATED. THEN 1H0 TEST IS FAILED. PERFORM THE ABOVE SETUP AND MEASUREMENTS FOR ALL REMAINING TRANSMISSION LINES. DaT CRITERIA ALL ANTENNAS IN ALL SECTORS HAVE RETURN LOSS GREATER THAN OR EOUAL TO THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE THRESHOLD. jBAN SINSSON 5YSIF11 RPTLAIN I MX TFCT; THE RETURN LOSS VALUE FOR THE AGGREGATE TRANSMISSION LINE AND ANTENNA SYSTEM (INCLUDING WEATHER PROOFING) 15 TO BE OBTAINED FOR BOTH THE BASE STATION TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE FREQUENCIES ASSIGNED AND CLEARED IN YOUR MARKET. THESE VALUES SHOULD BE REFERENCED TO THE THRESHOLD VALUE. IF THE VALUE OF THE RETURN LOSS IS LESS THAN THE DESIGNED VALUE. THEN THE SYSTEM FAILS AND NEEDS TO BE ANALYZED AND CORRECTED BEFORE REPEATING THE ATP. ENTRANCE CRITERIA - VERIFY THAT THE FREOUENCY CHANNELS ARE CLEAR BY CONTACTING RF ENGINEERING - PASSED PREUMINARY VISUAL INSPECTION - PASSED FEED UNE INSERTION LOSS TEST - PASSED FEED LINE DISTANCE -TO -FAULT TEST TEST PREPARATION - BTS RECEIVE FREQUENCY TESTS 1) VERIFY THAT ANTENNAS ARE CONNECTED TO THE APPROPRIATE FEED UNE AS DESIGNATED IN THE COLOR CODING SCHEME (SEE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS) 2) DETERMINE THE RETURN LOSS VALUE OF THE ANTENNA 3) VERIFY THE TORQUE/CRIMPER SETTING OF THE FEED UNE CONNECTOR. MATCHES THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 4) APPLY WEATHER PROOFING TO EACH ANTENNA/CONNECTOR INTERFACE. AVOID BLOCKING ANY WEEP HOLES ON THE ANTENNA. 5) CONNECT THE TEST EOUIPMENT TO THE BOTTOM JUMPER'S CONNECTOR AND ADJUST TO THE PROPER TOROUE SETTING. (SEE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION). 6) SET THE TEST EQUIPMENT FREQUENCY SWEEP RANGE TO THE BASE STATION RECEIVE RF FREQUENCIES USED IN YOUR MARKET. 7) CAUBRATE THE TEST EOUIPMENT ACCORDING TO TEST EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S EOUIPMENT. 8) VERIFY THAT THE DISPLAY WILL SHOW RETURN LOSS. THE SWEEP TESTS PROVIDE A MEANS OF DETERMINING THE CONDITION OF THE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM. IT IS IMPORTANT TO MAINTAIN A VALUE OF RETURN LOSS THAT 15 AS LOW AS POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM INTEGRITY. IT IS ALSO VITALLY IMPORTANT TO REAUZE THE PROPER TEST CONDITIONS WHEN ANALYZING THE SYSTEM. THE BEST RETURN LOSS FIGURES WILL ALWAYS OCCUR WHEN THERE 15 A 50 OHM LOAD PRESENT AT THE END OF THE TRANSMISSION UNE RATHER THAN AN ANTENNA. IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT TO COMPARE SWEEP RESULTS USING THE SAME EXACT SETUP. THAT IS IF THE MEASUREMENT WAS MADE WITH AN ANTENNA THE COMPARED RESULTS MUST BE MADE WITH THE SAME ANTENNA OR ONE WITH VERY SIMILAR RETURN LOSS CHARACTERISTICS. IF THE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED WITH A 50 OHM LOAD THEY MUST BE COMPARED WITH A 50 OHM TERMINATION. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL ODEN51085 ANO ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. NO VARIATIONS OR MO061CATION9 TO WORN SHOWN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF MORRISON HERSHFIELD CORPORATION. NEITHER MORRISON HERSHFIELD NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL BE PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION REVEW OF THL9 PROJECT. TESTING SEOUENCE - BTS RECEIVE FREQUENCY TESTS TAKE MEASUREMENT OF THE LOWEST RETURN LOSS VALUE OVER THE FREOUENCY BANG AND RECORD THE VALUE. IF THE MEASURED RETURN LOSS FOR THE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IS LESS THAN THE THRESHOLD VALUE, THEN THE TEST HAS FAILED. IF A FAILURE OCCURS, PERFORM A DISTANCE TO FAULT MEASUREMENT AND REPLACE THE SUSPECT COMPONENT. (NOTE AT THIS POINT, IF ALL OF THE PREVIOUS TESTS HAVE BEEN PERFORMED, THE ANTENNA CONNECTION 15 MOST LIKELY FAULTY). IF REPAIRS INVOLVE COMPONENTS OTHER THAN THE ANTENNA/ANTENNA CONNECTION RE -TEST INC TRANSMISSION LINE FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE ATP. 10 TEST PREPARATION - 815 TRANSMIT FREQUENCY TESTS - SET THE TEST EQUIPMENT FREQUENCY SWEEP RANGE TO INC BASE STATION TRANSMIT RF FREQUENCIES USED J R �� MARKET. - SET TRANSMIT POWER TO TEST EQUIPMENT DEFAULT r0 - CAUBRATE THE TEST EOUIPMENT ACCORDING TO TEST EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S EQUIPMENT - VERIFY THAT THE DISPLAY WILL SHOW RETURN LOSS - VERIFY RETURN LOSS VALUES TESTING SEOUENCE - 815 TRANSIRT FREQUENCY TESTS - TAKE MEASUREMENT OF THE LOWEST RETURN LOSS VALUE OVER THE FREQUENCY BAND AND RECORD THE VALUE. IF THE MEASURED RETURN LOSS FOR THE ANTENNA IS LESS THAN THE THRESHOLD VALUE, THEN THE TEST HAS FAILED. IF A FAILURE OCCURS. PERFORM A DISTANCE TO FAULT MEASUREMENT AND REPLACE THE SUSPECT COMPONENT. (60101 AT THIS POINT. IF ALL OF THE PREVIOUS TESTS HAVE BEEN PERFORMED, THE ANTENNA CONNECTION IS MOST UKELY FAULTY). IF REPAIRS INVOLVE COMPONENTS OTHER THAN THE ANTENNA/ANTENNA CONNECTION. RE -TEST THE TRANSMISSION UNE FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE ATP - PERFORM THE ABOVE SETUP AND MEASUREMENTS FOR ALL REMAINING TRANSMISSION LINES EZIT CRITERIA ALL ANTENNAS AND COMPONENTS IN ALL SECTORS HAVE RETURN LOSS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE THRESHOLD VALUE. - PASSED PRELIMINARY VISUAL INSPECTION - PASSED FEED UNE INSERTION LOSS TEST - PASSED FEED UNE DISTANCE -TO -FAULT TEST - PASSED ANTENNA SUBSYSTEM RETURN LOSS TEST 5— VTSL= TMSPLrTMW ENTRANCE CRITERIA PASSED ALL ELECTRICAL TESTS. TESTING SEQUENCE 1) VERIFY THAT THE RADOMES ON ALL ANTENNAS ARE SEALED AND DO NOT HAVE ANY CRACKS. INCLUDING GPS 2) CHECK THE ANTENNA MOUNTING 3) MEASURE ANTENNA ORIENTATION TO WITHIN 2 DEGREE RELATIVE TO MAGNETIC NORTH. MEASURE MECHANICAL DOWN -TILT TO WITHIN 0.25 DEGREE FROM HORIZONTAL FOR EACH ANTENNA IN EACH SECTOR. RECORD DOWN -TILT AND ORIENTATION ON THE VISUAL INSPECTION CHECK -OFF SHEET. 4) VERIFY THAT ANTENNA IS VERTICAL IN THE NON -TILT PLANE, I.E., NO SIDE TILT, (AZIMUTH PLANE 15 HORIZONTAL) TO WITHIN 0.25 DEGREES AND RECORD AS PASS OR FAIL ON THE VISUAL INSPECTION CHECK -OFF SHEET. 5) VERIFY THE COAXIAL COLOR CODING MATCHES THE CORRECT ANTENNA AND SECTOR AND INDICATE AS PASS OR FAIL ON THE VISUAL INSPECTION CHECK -OFF SHEET. (SEE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR ANTENNA CABLE COLOR CODING SCHEME). 6) VERIFY THAT APPROPRIATE TAGS ARE ATTACHED TO THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE FEED UNE SYSTEM AND INDICATE PASS OR FAIL ON THE VISUAL INSPECTION CHECK -OFF SHEET. 7) VERIFY THAT CONNECTOR WEATHER PROOFING IS COMPLETE AND INDICATE ON THE VISUAL INSPECTION CHECK -OFF SHEET. 8) CAREFULLY CHECK ALL ANTENNA FEED UNES FOR DENTS AND KINKS AND OTHER ANOMAUES AND INDICATE OBSERVATIONS ON THE VISUAL INSPECTION CHECK -OFF SHEET. 9) RECORD ALL INFORMATION IN THE SITE LOG BOOK AND THE SITE SPREADSHEET DOT CRITERIA SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE ANTENNA SWEEPING ATP CONNECTORS P/F SECTOR #1 SECTOR 82 SECTOR #3 WEATHER PROOFING P/4 SECTOR j!1 SECTOR 12 SECTOR 63 WEATHFR PROOFING P/F SECTOR #1 SECTOR d2 SECTOR 13 ANTENNA P/F SECTOR #1 SECTOR j!2 SECTOR E3 BTS OR RFFE TAG ANTENM DONM INT AMD ORIFMATTON 4FCTOR &Male DOWN -TILT ORIFNTATIDN SIDE TILT SECTOR 1 TXO/RXD RX1 SECTOR 2 TXO/RXD RXI SECTOR 3 150/050 851 ANTENNA TOP JUMPER COLOR CODING GROUNDING STRAP TRANSMISSION LINE 80708 JUMPER COAX 00108 COOS P/F SECTOR R1 SECTOR 12 SECTOR R3 fOAX CARLE P/F SECTOR Al SECTOR 12 SECTOR 13 GROUNDING SECTOR R1 SECTOR R2 SECTOR R3 RECEIVED 2ME 8259 REGISTERED ARCHITECT 11RTJZRRVLA&A TE O 4 OBE JE ""Y URA LICENSED ARCHITECT STATE OF WASHINGTON 8259 6 5 4 3 2 0 D7/06/10 ISSUED FOR PERMIT A 06/16/10 ISSUED FOR REVIEW No. Dote Action m' MORRISON HERSHFIELD 10900 NE 8TH STREET, SUITE 810 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Tel: 425.451.1301 Fax: 425.451.1369 www.morrisonhershfield.com Client: clear re. 4400 CARILLION POINT KIRKLAND. WA 98033 Project: ATC SOUTHGATE PARK WA-SEA255 13130 44TH AVE S SEATTLE. WA 98168 Drowing Title: RF SYSTEM DETAILS Scale: As shown Project Na. 810010900 Designer R.M. Dote: 06/16/10 Omen Br R.M. Checked Br R.L. Project Manager. R.N. CSent Approval Issue No. 0 Drawing No. E-1 3 4 5 COMMUM TY SCALL' S e sE ON 12T N T" SIZE OEVEI,LOP Ei+ll'i'Pt( ". OtiK %\ 4I 6 G