Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL10-059 - TACO TIME - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT / ACCESS CONTROL ANALYSISTACO TIME 15037 TIB PLI 0-059 L10-071, L10-077 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT City of Tukwila 11e, ec N MEMORANDUM TO: Development Project File FROM: Robin Tischmak, P.E., City Engineer DATE: November 28, 2011 Jim Haggerton, Mayor SUBJECT: Taco Time —15037 Tukwila International Boulevard Access Control Analysis — Military Road Background A new 2,418 square foot Taco Time restaurant is proposed for construction at 15037 Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) replacing a 3,096 square foot tavern (Trudy's Tavern) on the same site. The property for the proposed restaurant fronts on TIB mid -block between S 150th St and S 152nd St. The westerly property line abuts Military Road, which resides within the City of SeaTac. Two driveways are proposed for the new development (both exist today under the current use), one connecting to TIB to the east and one connecting to Military Road to the west. Frontal improvements are not required along TIB because urban street improvements were constructed as part of TIB Phase 1 in 2003. The City of SeaTac has indicated that frontal improvements are required along Military Road. Issue Both of the proposed/existing driveways have been approved and accepted by Tukwila and SeaTac. The subject of access control has been raised as a potential issue. Access at TIB will be right in/right out as an existing curb separating northbound and southbound traffic was constructed as part of the TIB Phase 1 improvements. This curb was installed for safety and must remain in place. No access control currently exists along Military Road. All directional movements are currently allowed to and from the site as it exists today. The subject of this memorandum is: "Is access control warranted on Military Rd. for this proposed project ?". Analysis To determine whether or not access control for a specific site is warranted, an engineering analysis is needed. The analysis should include examination of 1) the existing conditions, 2) traffic patterns/volumes, 3) accident history, and 4) the anticipated impacts resulting from the proposed development. These elements will be discussed as part of this memorandum. 1) Existing Conditions Military Road is classified as a minor arterial according to SeaTac's Comprehensive Plan. AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets offers the following on the function of minor arterials: "The minor arterial street system includes all arterials not classified as principal. This system places more emphasis on land access than the higher system does and offers lower traffic mobility.". Additional passages include: "Arterials are expected to provide a high degree of mobility for the longer trip length. Therefore, they should provide a high operating speed and level of service. Since access to abutting property is not their major H:\Taco Time Memo.doc • INFORMATIONAL MEMO November 28, 2011 Page 2 function, some degree of access control is desirable to enhance mobility." and "The first step in the design process is to define the function that the facility is to serve.". The observations and assumptions discussed below are subject to clarification, correction, or differing interpretations by the City of SeaTac. Military Road is one of the earliest roads constructed in the region that connects the Seattle area to the Tacoma area. The portion of Military Road that is the subject of this memorandum generally connects Des Moines Memorial Drive in Boulevard Park to Tukwila International Blvd. at S 152"d St. The original alignment of Military Road was severed by the construction of Pacific Highway South (SR 99) and SR 518 and a gap was created between S 152nd St and S 160th St. The roadway is two lanes (one northbound and one southbound) and does not currently have any median barriers that restrict turning movements along the border between SeaTac and Tukwila. The land use abutting the roadway in both cities is predominantly residential. The SeaTac frontage is residential north of S 150th St and commercial south of S 150th St. The Tukwila land use is commercial from S 146th St to SR 518, including the proposed Taco Time property. The intersection of Military Road / S 152"d St is controlled by a 4 -way stop 2) Traffic Patterns/Volumes Traffic count data was provided by SeaTac for this analysis and covered the dates of November 15 — 21, 2009. The total daily average for this period was 7,724 vehicles per day. The average volume northbound was 3,507 vehicles per day and the average volume southbound was 4,217 vehicles per day. Morning peak hour is consistently 11:00 a.m. to noon with volumes ranging from 170 — 253 northbound and 188 — 279 southbound. The afternoon peak hour start time varies between 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. during the week. Peak hour volumes range from 258 — 355 northbound and 331 — 402 southbound. Traffic congestion is not problematic on Military Road between S 150th St and S 152nd St for most hours of any 24-hour period. Northbound traffic does not experience back-ups within this roadway segment, but southbound traffic does back up from the stop condition at S 152"d St past the proposed Taco Time property during peak hours. A level -of -service calculation was not performed for this study, but is assumed to be within acceptable standards. 3) Accident History An accident history of reported collisions was ordered from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) database for the time period of January 1, 2008 through March 31, 2011. The accident history covered the intersections of S 150th St and S 152"d St on Military Road as well as Military Road between the two intersections. There were 26 reported accidents within the timeframe specified. From the accident data supplied by WSDOT, only two accidents occurred that are related to vehicles entering or exiting mid -block driveways and only one of those accidents could be attributed to use of the driveway for the proposed Taco Time. The second accident was related to a driveway on the west side of Military Road. 4) Anticipated Impacts of the Proposed Development Based on the existing conditions and the above data gathered for this proposed Taco Time development, an analysis of the anticipated impacts related to the driveway access to Military Road has been prepared. The following bullets summarize the key findings used to formulate a recommended approach to access control. • The function of a minor arterial, as defined by AASHTO, is to provide mobility for longer trip lengths as well as access to abutting properties. The proper balance is determined H:ITaco Time Memo.doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO November 28, 2011 Page 3 by the site specific land uses, traffic volumes, accident history, and other relevant characteristics. Access control is not considered a priority, but may be used if determined to be appropriate. • A driveway has existed at the location of the proposed Taco Time for many years without adverse impacts to Military Road. This development will not significantly alter the use from how it operates today. While the trip generation determined by land use assumes that the new development (Taco Time) is equivalent to the existing use (tavern), an increased usage of the driveway access may actually occur. This will be discussed in the final summary. • There is no recent accident history that suggests access control is necessary at this time. • While the southbound p.m. peak hour will affect access to and from the driveway on Military Road in certain directions, full access during all other times of any 24-hour period is expected to operate within typical parameters and without significant adverse impacts. • The proposed drive-thru exit is situated adjacent to the T.I.B. driveway access and is expected to absorb the majority of ingress/egress trips. • There are no problems anticipated with access to the site. • There appear to be logical and redundant exit routes from the site to accommodate various directions of travel without compromising safety. Heavy traffic volumes may influence driver decisions, but short alternate routing should self -direct traffic away from heavily congested areas. Summary Military Road is a minor arterial that currently operates with low enough volumes to accommodate longer through trips as well as to provide access to abutting properties without restrictions. This proposed project is not expected to significantly change the current operations. There is no evidence that a safety problem or accident history exists along this segment of Military Road or that this project will create such problems upon�opening for business. There is adequate capacity that gaps are created to allow full access turning movements throughout a 24-hour period with the exception of the southbound p.m. peak hour(s) on Military Road. Logic suggests that a backup of traffic southbound will force vehicles exiting to Military Road to turn northbound and find a short alternate route to take them the direction they wish to travel. Additionally, turning southbound onto Military Road takes a driver back to T.I.B. in the vicinity of S 152nd St, the same location as if they were to exit directly onto T.I.B. The most logical reason a driver would choose to turn left onto Military Road Would be to access westbound S 152nd St. During times of heavy traffic, they would be able to turn right onto Military Road and access S 1501 St westbound, thus serving the same essential function. Based on the above analysis, if this project and the jurisdiction of adjacent public roadways were in the city limits of Tukwila, the City of Tukwila would not require installation of a median curb along the centerline of Military Road restricting left turn access. Tukwila would, however, continue to monitor traffic for possible installation of a median curb if warranted in the future. The final decision reqardinq installation of any median curb on Military Road lies with the City of SeaTac. Attachments: Site Map; AASHTO Guideline Excerpts; Traffic Volumes; Accident History H:ITaco Time Memo.doc • TACK IN LEAD IN .3 -XJ. Co ON. DN. O. IN CA (8/2009) P n 8 SE .1/4, NW 1/4,SEC 22, TWP 23N, RGE 4E, W.M. S 144TH ST .587'3575'E 2.652.05' TUK.W!LA F• NO 'MARK W BR SS SSC ONJ CONCRETE MONUMENT W CASE; 00994 0.8' A�OF�6EN TERINE) 10/27/2010 • 756.92' FOUND REBAR AND CAP CRONES 2953r 0.1' NORTH AND I.2 x£sr :,.F PROPERTY CORNER —/\ TACO Tl.ME FOUND REBA A C. P . CRONES 2953 NORTH AND 0.7' 8EST PROPERTY CORNER 4 /. . FOUND REBAR Er CAP CRONES 29537" 0.2'NORTH.ANO 0.6' HEST Sc PARCEL CORN I . • 6C1, -STORY CONCRETE • STRUCTURE NEW PARCEL'2 *3& l43 SF. PARCEL A. /. 3 19.3.48' 56670 JF 2611.37' 5 152ND ST :?M 9140 ' UNCH IN 12" BRA PI 4 4 CONC MON, DPI 0.65' IN CASE. (8/2009) CALCULATED P SI DON PER RI 15 CO 22 AASHTO—Geometric Design of Highways and Streets Urban Minor Arterial Street System The minor arterial street system interconnects with and augments the urban principal arterial system. It accommodates trips of moderate length at a somewhat lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials do. This system distributes travel to geographic areas smaller than those identified with the higher system. The minor arterial street system includes all arterials not classified as principal. This system places more emphasis on land access than the higher system does and offers lower traffic mobility. Such a facility may carry local bus routes and provide intracommunity continuity but ideally does not penetrate identifiable neighborhoods. This system includes urban connections to rural collector roads where such connections have not been classified as urban principal arterials for internal reasons. The spacing of minor arterial streets may vary from 0.2 to 1.0 km [0.1 to 0.5 mi] in the • central business district to 3 to 5 km [2 to 3 -mi] in the suburban fringes but is normally not more than 2 km [ 1 mi) in fully developed areas. Highway Functions Functional Classification as a Design Type This text has utilized the functional classification system as a design type of highway. Two major difficulties arise from this usage. The first major problem involves freeways. A freeway is not a functional class in itself but is normally classified as a principal arterial. It does, however, have unique geometric criteria that demand a separate design designation apart from other arterials. Therefore, a separate chapter on freeways has been included along with chapters on arterials, collectors, and local roads and streets. The addition of the universally familiar term "freeway" to the basic functional classes seems preferable to the adoption of a complete separate system of design types. The second major difficulty is that, in the past, geometric design criteria and capacity levels have traditionally been based on a classification of traffic volume ranges. Under such a system, highways with comparable traffic volumes are constructed to the same criteria and provide identical levels of service, although there may be considerable difference in the functions they serve. Under a functional classification system, design criteria and level of service vary according to the function of the highway facility. Volumes serve to further refine the design criteria for each class. Arterials are expected to provide a high degree of mobility for the longer trip length. Therefore, they should provide a high operating speed and level of service. Since access to abutting property is not their major function, some degree of access control is desirable to enhance mobility. The collectors serve a .dual function in accommodating the shorter. trip and feeding the arterials. They should provide some degree of mobility and also serve abutting property. Thus, an intermediate design speed and level of service is appropriate. Local roads and streets have relatively short trip lengths, and, because property access is their main function, there is little need for mobility or high operating speeds. This function is reflected by use of a lower design speed and level of service. The functional concept is important to the designer. Even though many of the geometric design values could be determined without reference to the functional classification, the designer should keep in mind the overall purpose that the street or highway is intended to serve. This concept is consistent with a systematic approach to highway planning and design. The first step in the design process is to define the function that the facility is to serve. The level of service needed to fulfill this function for the anticipated volume and composition of traffic provides a rational and cost-effective basis for the selection of design speed and geometric criteria within the ranges of values available to the designer. The use of functional classification as a design type should appropriately integrate the highway planning and design process. 13 SEATAC, WASHINGTON MILITARY RD S N/O S 152ND ST LOC# TC244N Start 09 -Nov -09 Time NB SB 12:00 AM 01:00 ' 02:00 :03:00- 04:00_ 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 -. 09:00 ___ .10:00_ 11:00 ; 12:00 PM __01:00 :_-- 02:00 03:00---.: 04:00 05:00_ 06:00 07:00 __ : 08:00 09:00:,._ 10:00 11:00 Lane Day AM Peak Volume PM Peak Volume Trafficount, Inc. P Box 2508 Olympia, WA 98507 (360) 491-8116 Tue NB SB Wed NB SB Thu NB SB Fri NB SB Sat NB SB NB Page 1 Site Code: TC244N Station ID: Latitude: -999' 0.000 South Sun Week Average NB SB SB 70 76 54 _ _62 58 40 _26 26 16_ 31 23 24 49 66 42 76 60 82 112 145 118 165 170 188 207 281 239 290 253 268 246 331 236 270 ___ 258 274 -- 194 207 168__ _183 143 152 _125 150 74 82 62 ' 67 70 76 54 62 58 40 26 26. 16 31 23 :24'. 49 66 ...4276 s0_ 82 112 145 118 165 170 188 207 281 239 _ 29b 253 268 246 _ . 331 236 270 258 274 194 207 _ 168 _ ;' :183 143 152 125 ._: 150. 74 82 62 67 3003 3536 6539 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3003 0 6539 3536 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 170 188 170 188 17:00 15:00 17:00 15:00 258 331 258 331 SEATAC, WASHINGTON MILITARY RD S N/O S 152ND ST LOC# TC244N Start 16 -Nov -09 Trafficount, Inc. P Box 2508 Olympia, WA 98507 (360) 491-8116 Tue NB SB Wed NB SB Thu NB SB Fri NB SB Sat NB SB Page 2 Site Code: TC244N Station ID: Latitude: -999' 0.000 South Sun Week Average NB SB NB SB 12:00 AM 25 32 _ . 01:00 _ _ : 14 . _ 17- 02:00 12 14 03:00_ __ -14 ` '25 04:00 14 41 ,__0$:00 45 _. __ 77 06:00 85 158 _: 07:00:* __ 126,2 _ ___193.._ 08:00 153 189 . . 09:00 - -_ 157.-- .4__ 189 10:00 - _ 183 235 11:00 221 245 12:00 PM 259 303 01.:00. _ . 254 _ _ :: _273 02:00 270 334 296-352 03:00 _312 04:00 _ 272 348 _ __ _ 05:00 ___ _; ._332 06:00 265 239 07:00 = 147 213..._ 08:00 162156 -- 09:00._ , _11Z - 128 10:00 10984 11:00' . 55 " 103 : _ __--203 ..,_ _ 28 41 19 _ 16 10 26 ,10 =- - 24 12 46 _ ,_40_._. 84 86 144 .1_136. 186. 126 171 129 -170 232 207 238 3249 17 - 20. 11 _. 2416 -- 8______.23 12_ -_ 46 = 33 • 69 86 148 131 .:225 130 190 146 - 209 185.-_ 228 .209_ 251 29 42 21. _ 29 16 16. 13 : 21 15 -.. 35 : 27 • 80 82 138 144 -._ -205- 146 180 — _ 147 181 _ 139_- _ _218 178 226 41 _ 26 - 28 _ _ 16 _ 10 �: 29. 94 127 129 126 184 253 302 355 ,_ • 298 ._ - - _ 279 _- _ 276 _ 223 169 ----163:.--- 136 99 - 43 22 38 27 34 83: 147 209. 143 166 229 279- 266 402 354 354 332 __356, 287 259. 178 183 156 111. _ ; _ _-.-, ._.- 65 81 58. 41 56 56 32 35 .- 15.. 31. :- 20-` - 33 42 56 37 _ _ 118 65 105 124 _ 183. 166 218 190 276 277 _ _. 316 273 .— 354 269 305 272 278, 332 _255. 269:: 195 247 186 248 157 184 ----:162 142 134 135 � 109 118 _ �_,_- - , . :` : .._ _ :. * '... * " * * * * * * * * * * * • * * _ " ' * -.,. * * '" * * * * * * * ...' * * .._* _ : 37 48 26 24 22 29 16 -: 26 13 39 . 32 . 71' 79 132 117 189. 125 163 . 138 ..183- 177 227 _ 210 _ _•252 249,285 267 . -308 293 327 294 337 307 355 -- 268 315 248 257 192 234 159 169 132 : 146. 113 117 77 97 235 312 _ 252 '_ _ 263 300 318 284 316 332 364 .. 305- 229.. _ 264 -275 - --273 285 338 _ 335_ 350 307.J 366 - _ 2782_2_ .312 259 259 : :. 189: 211. 152 168 " 141 .., 222 251273- • 245,* 283 281 315 279 337 317 388338 - - - 280_ - 317 212 252 . _. 190 251. 149 162 _._ :_130_--; _-.137 110 123 . 84 85 ._ -.240 284 256 218 221 163 168 117 -A146 96 111 50 `' • 88 _:. _..111 94 94 65 75 Lane Day AM Peak Volume PM Peak Volume 3523 7803 11:00 11:00 221 245 15:00 15:00 296 352 4280 3577 7823 11:00 11:00 207 238 16:00 16:00 332 364 4246 3579 7912 11:00 11:00 209 251 15:00 16:00 335 366 4333 3456 7728 11:00 11:00 178 226 16:00 16:00 317 388 4272 3974 8632 11:00 11:00 253 279 14:00 13:00 355 402 4658 3437 4195 0 0 3591 7632 0 7921 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 190 276 210 252 16:00 13:00 16:00 16:00 278 354 307 355 4330 Comb. Total 7803 7823 7912 7728 8632 7632 6539 14460 ADT Not Calculated Reported collisions that occurred on or in the vicinity ivnnidry Ru UC IweelI J L. UU1 JL aI IU J t✓ul' wr.a..... , ...... __, - *As of 1/1/2009 citizen reports are no Ionger being captured (Report # begins with "C") Prepared by: WSDOT/STCDO/CDAB/MB 10/19/11 1 of 3 UNDER 23 UNITED STATES CODE - SECTION 409, THIS DATA CANNOT BE USED IN DISCOVERY OR AS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL IN ANY ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE WSDOT, OR THE JURISDICTIONS INVOLVED IN THE DATA 1 PRIMARY BLOCK INTERSECTING TRAFFICWAY DIST FROM REF POINT MI or FT COMP DIR FROM REF POINT REFERENCE POINT NAME SECONDARY TRAFFICWAY 1 SECONDARY TRAFFICWAY 2 *REPORT NUMBER DATE TIME MOST SEVERE INJURY TYPE # INJ #FAT #VEH FIRST COLLISION TYPE / OBJECT STRUCK TRAFFICWAY NUMBER 2843214 03/20/10 6:25 PM No Injury 0 0 1 Other object MILITARY RD S 14828 E022265 06/29/09 4:20 PM Possible Injury 1 0 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight MILITARY RD S ST 15000 MILITARY RD S INTERNATIONAL BLVD S 2846887 03/29/09 6:47 PM Serious Injury 3 0 4 One parked --one moving S 150 50 F 5 S 148 ST 2776297 09/08/08 5:20 PM Possible Injury 2 0 2 One car leaving driveway access MILITARY RD MILITARY RD S 14800 14800 0 F S S 148 ST 2776363 02/20/08 4:20 PM No Injury 0 0 2 From same direction - both going straight - both moving - rear -end 3095993 09/22/08 3:00 PM No Injury 0 0 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear -end 60 F S S 148 ST MILITARY RD S MILITARY RD S 14800 14900 50 F N S 150 ST 2757033 08/01/09 9:40 PM No Injury 0 0 2 One parked --one moving One parked --one moving MILITARY RD S 15000 75 F S S 150 ST 2787303 03/22/08 1:00 PM No Injury 0 0 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight RD 5 15000 150 F N S 150 ST 2787269 04/28/09 4:18 PM No Injury 0 0 2 MILITARY F S S 150 ST E082969 12/13/10 4:26 PM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY RD S 15000 300 125 F S S 152 3096208 07/09/09 11:45 AM No Injury 0 0 2 One car leaving parked position MILITARY RD S 15200 300 F N S 152 ST 2998284 01/21/09 5:11 PM No Injury 0 0 3 One parked --one moving MILITARY RD S S 150 15200 50 F S S 152 ST E048592 04/07/10 5:49 PM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY RD RD S 2787323 11/28/08 11:30 AM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle 5 152 ST MILITARY 2552125 10/03/08 1:05 PM Possible Injury 1 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY RD S MILITARY RD S S 150 S 150 ST E020308 05/29/09 10:00 AM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle 2 0 2 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight RD S S 150 ST 2552048 06/12/09 4:23 PM Possible Injury MILITARY MILITARY RD S S 150 ST E072298 10/15/10 6:17 PM No Injury 0 0 3 From opposite direction - one left turn - one straight No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle S 150 ST E096326 03/15/11 6:30 PM MILITARY RD S S ST 3095675 05/11/08 10:12 PM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY RD S 15000 150 2784007 05/19/08 7:20 AM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY RD S S 152 ST E031348 10/28/09 9:00 PM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY RD RD S S 152 S 152 ST 3096127 10/12/08 4:10 PM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY S 152 ST 3096262 01/05/09 8:40 AM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle MILITARY RD S MILITARY RD S S 152 ST 2843158 08/20/09 9:03 AM No Injury 0 0 2 From same direction - both going straight - one stopped - rear -end 9:45 AM No Injury 0 0 2 Entering at angle ST E074323 10/27/10 MILITARY RD S 5 152 Prepared by: WSDOT/STCDO/CDAB/MB 10/19/11 1 of 3 UNDER 23 UNITED STATES CODE - SECTION 409, THIS DATA CANNOT BE USED IN DISCOVERY OR AS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL IN ANY ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE WSDOT, OR THE JURISDICTIONS INVOLVED IN THE DATA Reported collisions that occurred on or in the vicinity ivinitary r u ueiween 1DUui 31. d11U a 1-7411L1../l. vvn *As of 1/1/2009 citizen reports are no longer being captured (Report tt begins with "C") Prepared by: WSDOT/STCDO/CDAB/MB 10/19/11 2 of 3 UNDER 23 UNITED STATES CODE - SECTION 409, THIS DATA CANNOT BE USED IN DISCOVERY OR AS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL IN ANY ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE WSDOT, OR THE JURISDICTIONS INVOLVED IN THE DATA JUNCTION RELATIONSHIP WEATHER LIGHTING CONDITIONS ROADWAY SURFACE CONDITIONS VEHICLE 1 TYPE VEH 1 ACTION VEH 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL VEH 1 COMP DIR FROM VEH 1 COMP DIR TO At Driveway Overcast Daylight Dry Passenger Car Making Right Turn No Traffic Control North West At Driveway Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Making Left Turn No Traffic Control South West At Driveway Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Backing Stop Sign North Vehicle Backing At Driveway Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Making Right Turn No Traffic Control West South Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control South North Intersection Related but Not at Intersection Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control South North Not Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dark -Street Lights On Dry Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control North South at Not Intersection and Not Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Pickup,Panel Truck or Vanette under 10,000 Ib Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control South North at At Driveway Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Making Left Turn No Traffic Control South West At Driveway Raining Dark -Street Lights On Wet Passenger Car Making Left Turn No Traffic Control East South Not Intersection and Not Related Overcast Daylight Dry Passenger Car Backing No Traffic Control Northwest Vehicle Backing at At Driveway but Not Related Overcast Dusk Dry Pickup,Panel Truck or Vanette under 10,000 Ib Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control Northwest Southeast At Driveway Raining Daylight Wet Passenger Car Making Left Turn No Traffic Control West North At Intersection and Related Raining Daylight Wet Pickup,Panel Truck or Vanette under 10,000 Ib Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign North South At Intersection and Related Raining Daylight Wet Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign East West At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign East West At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Making Left Turn No Traffic Control North East At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Dusk Dry Passenger Car Making Left Turn No Traffic Control North East At Intersection and Related Raining Dusk Wet Passenger Car Starting in Traffic Lane Stop Sign East West At Intersection and Related Overcast Dark -Street Lights On Wet Not Stated Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control South North At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Not Stated Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign East West At Intersection and Related Raining Dark -Street Lights On Wet Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign North South At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign North South At Intersection and Related Overcast Daylight Wet Passenger Car Starting in Traffic Lane Stop Sign West East At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Dry Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign North South At Intersection and Related Clear or Partly Cloudy Daylight Wet Passenger Car Starting in Traffic Lane Stop Sign West East Prepared by: WSDOT/STCDO/CDAB/MB 10/19/11 2 of 3 UNDER 23 UNITED STATES CODE - SECTION 409, THIS DATA CANNOT BE USED IN DISCOVERY OR AS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL IN ANY ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE WSDOT, OR THE JURISDICTIONS INVOLVED IN THE DATA Reported collisions that occurred on or in the vicinity Military Ka between s 'sum st aria 3 wILI IUi Luc �tLr . J,.“/ •••• --- - *As of 1/1/2009 citizen reports are no longer being captured (Report # begins with "C") MV DRIVER CONT CIRC 1 (UNIT 1) Improper Turn VEHICLE 2 TYPE VEH 2 ACTION VEH 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL VEH 2 COMP DIR FROM VEH 2 COMP DIR TO MV DRIVER CONT CIRC 1 (UNIT 2) Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Improper Backing Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead IMPACT LOCATION (2010 forward) Past the Outside Shoulder of Primary Trafficway No Traffic Control North South None Passenger Car Legally Parked, Unoccupied Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Follow Too Closely Other Other Driver Operating Handheld Telecommunicat Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Improper Backing Other Passenger Car Pickup,Panel Truck or Vanette under 10,000 Ib School Bus Passenger Car Truck Tractor Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Passenger Car Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead Slowing Stopped for Traffic Legally Parked, Occupied Legally Parked, Occupied Going Straight Ahead Passenger Car Passenger Car Disregard Stop Sign - Flashing Red Disregard Stop Sign - Flashing Red Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Passenger Car No Traffic Control No Traffic Control No Traffic Control North South South None South North Vehicle Stopped None None No Traffic Control Going Straight Ahead Stopped for Traffic Passenger Car Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle None Passenger Car Passenger Car No Traffic Control North South South North None None Lane of Primary Trafficway Legally Parked, Unoccupied Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control South Vehicle Stopped None No Traffic Control South North None Lane of Primary Trafficway Starting in Traffic Lane Passenger Car Disregard Stop Sign - Flashing Red Disregard Stop Sign - Flashing Red Disregard Stop Sign - Flashing Red Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Other Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead Going Straight Ahead Stop Sign Unknown East West None North South None No Traffic Control North South None Going Straight Ahead Passenger Car Passenger Car Passenger Car Passenger Car Going Straight Ahead No Traffic Control South North None No Traffic Control South North None Going Straight Ahead Passenger Car Making Right Turn No Traffic Control South North Starting in Traffic Lane Starting in Traffic Lane Passenger Car Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Prepared by: WSDOT/STCDO/CDAB/MB 10/19/11 3 of 3 Passenger Car Passenger Car Stop Sign East North None Did Not Grant RW to Vehicle Lane of Primary Trafficway Lane of Primary Trafficway Stop Sign North South None Stop Sign West East None Starting in Traffic Lane Starting in Traffic Lane Stop Sign West East None Stop Sign North South None Stopped at Signal or Stop Sign Starting in Traffic Lane Stop Sign North Vehicle Stopped None Stop Sign South North None Lane of Primary Trafficway UNDER 23 UNITED STATES CODE - SECTION 409, THIS DATA CANNOT BE USED IN DISCOVERY OR AS EVIDENCE AT TRIAL IN ANY ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE WSDOT, OR THE JURISDICTIONS INVOLVED IN THE DATA A4,07 A14- 1/(41 t)i), 2_), J+ 4 /2,44 r (joy' g 5 30 ,c City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director March 3, 2011 Mr. Chris Tonkin 3300 Maple Valley Hwy Renton, WA 98058 RE: Taco Time Boundary Line Adjustment Application L10-071 Dear Mr. Tonkin: The Short Subdivision Committee has completed their review of the above -referenced Boundary Line Adjustment application. Preliminary approval of the BLA is granted, subject to the following conditions. These conditions are to ensure compliance with the City's Zoning, Fire, and Public Works requirements. All conditions must be satisfied prior to final approval and subsequent recording of the BLA documents. General Conditions 1. The existing Trudy's Tavern building is located on the proposed new property line and does not meet setbacks requirements. The building must be removed prior to final approval and recording of the BLA application. A permit will be required for the demolition. 2. Parking for the existing Trudy's Tavern and the retail building to the north is currently shared. The proposed new line intersects the existing parking stalls. Prior to final approval the parking shall be restriped. Sufficient parking, complying with the Tukwila Municipal Code, shall be provided on the north lot and the parking lot layout approved by the City under application L10-077 shall be installed. 3. Sheet 4 of 4 shows an existing waterline along the east property line. It appears that no easement is recorded for the waterline. Prior to final approval an easement will need to be executed with Water District 125 for the waterline. Provide the recorded number on the face of the BLA once the easement is recorded. 4. The construction plans (Civil Sheet 3 of 3) has a sanitary sewer easement extended to the north parcel. This easement needs to be reflected on the face of the BLA by providing the recording number. Modifications to the Recording Document The following modifications need to be made to the recording document: 1. Add the File Number, L10-071 to the face of the BLA. 2. On sheet 3 of 4 show the proposed new lot line. B. Miles Page 1 H:\Developments\Taco Time, TIB\BLA\PRELIMINARY APPROVAL.doc 03/03/2011 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 • • Once the above conditions are satisfied you may submit for final approval of the BLA. When you resubmit, please provide four copies of the BLA document, one document must contain the original signatures of all individuals and entities which have an interest in the property. Additionally, the surveyor's original stamp and signature must be on this copy. Appeals This boundary line adjustment approval or any condition placed in decision is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. One administrative appeal of the decision on the short plat is permitted. If no valid appeals are filed within the time limit the decision of the Department will be final. In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of the Notice of Decision (03/24/2011). The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 4. Any appeal shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. Recording It is your responsibility to record the City approved BLA document with the King County Department of Records. The BLA is not complete until the recording occurs and copies of the recorded documents are provided to the Department of Community Development. After recording, the County returns the recorded originals to the City within four to six weeks at which time your BLA is considered complete and you can obtain individual building permits for each lot. You can shorten this process by hand delivering a copy of the recorded BLA with parcel numbers to the Department. B. Miles Page 2 03/03/2011 H:\Developments\Taco Time, TIB\BLA\PRELIMINARY APPROVAL.doc • Do not fold or bend the final short plat map that will be recorded with King County. Expiration The final BLA must be filed with the King County Department of Records by February 24, 2012, exactly 12 months from the date of this preliminary approval or the application will expire. Please keep this date in mind in the coming months. The City is in no way obligated to remind you of this expiration date. The City may grant one extension of not more than twelve months. The request for an extension must be made in writing and must be submitted to the City prior to the expiration of the BLA. If the BLA approval expires, subsequent development permits that are related to the short plat shall also expire and any vesting will be lost. If you have any questions, please call Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684 or send an email to bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerel ck Pace, Director epartment of Community velopment ,t IP cc. Bob Gibers , n' '''", Public Works Director Nick Olivas , Fire Chief Joanna Spencer Development Engineer B. Miles Page 3 02/18/2011 H:\Developments\Taco Time, TIB\BLA\PRELIMINARY APPROVAL.doc • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L D-771 PL LAND USE PERMIT ' • TING FORM TO: Building U Planning Public Wor . Fire Dept. 0Police Dept. In Parks/Rec Project: `kc0 1 6 'f i 1 413\A> Comments prepared bylk Address: I � D 7 I l 1 3 Date ,p, transmitted: `� ill 1111 0 Response requested by: Staff coordinator: 13 , % 0 )(i" Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: i 1 413\A> Comments prepared bylk `M,5 Update date: • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number .0 D -7J% n� 11/4)-D561 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TOS (Iq�l Building ) n Planning k Public Works ly Fire Dept. f❑I Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: e-, ids6 B y�' Address: 147Z7 I 113 Date transmitted: 0 111 i 11 C 0 Response requested by: StaffDate coordinator: 13 , /1.1(c response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date,: /e5/ �•Comments O date date: prepared b TO: • RECEIVE[ NOV 18 2010 TUKWIIA. PUBLIC WORKS City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number .0 D-771 PL LAND USE P IT ROUTING FORM Building U Planning IR Public Works kl Fire Dept. Police Dept. ❑I Parks/Rec Project: 1 t,c1 CommentsUpdate va2)/t.,� I� prepared by: <��t date: T ` D Address: I f 13 l Date transmitted: 0 t (11 i 1 0 Response P requested by: Staff coordinator: i3..11;16- Date response received: (GI ( 0 REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) ,CISTI,1 is/� '44 s'& t o t. U BLit- . ► b ! 0V bow-e,o-e Ivo c ccs • • ' v D* I a5tP r=c ' , tAZ ceche, mow, ( Ade, n• ->ti ,•.,• 5 1 :� TAA:s / co , Se,01 % ov► c:;ko 444 Plan check date: 1)1 I'1 aA l O CommentsUpdate va2)/t.,� I� prepared by: <��t date: TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development • File Number tlD-771 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building IEI Planning Public Works Fire Dept. 0 Police Dept. 0 Parks/Rec Project: ei 1 C,eo I i' ( 14 Address: I f f l Date transmitted: 0 it 1 I 1 I( 0) Response requested by: Staff coordinator: (, %ii.ki- Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: AEC CITY OFA prs-^rte TERRAFORMA jFE�O'�2012''c" MIT OEN �F�B03''� DESIGN GROUP PER, February 1, 2012 Project: Taco Time 15037 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Regarding: Plant Substitutions and Soil at Wall Plant Substitution Request from contractor: due to plant unavailability Approved= 31 Forsythia "Gold Tide, 5 gallon for the Escallonia "Newport Dwarf" Approved= 15 Euonymus "Emerald and Gold" for Hebe `Autumn Glory' Approved= 15 Potentilla for the Hebe `Autumn Glory' Tree Substitution for Revised Site (new wall at drive thru): Substitute 19 quantity of the Acer Rubrum `Bowhall' with 19 quantity of Prunus cerasifera `cripoizam' (Crimson Pointe Plum) for the site. The Prunus will not get as large as the Acer so will be better for the wall area. Trees to be minimum 2" caliper as on approved plan. Soil at wall area: The soil in the planter at the area of the new wall shall contain a minimum of 18" of viable free draining topsoil as noted on the original specifications. From: Akemi Sakaida, LA Terraforma Design Group, Inc. attachment: 1 ,'P CIVIL ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 5027 51st Avenue SW Seattle WA 98136 phone 206.923.0590 website www.terraformadesigngroup.com ■ WISTERIA ON ;;' TOP OF NEW 6' TRELLIS ° ti ■ rl - E CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL IS +/- 12" HT AT WEST END CONCRETE BLOCK RETAININ WALL IS +/- 42" HT AT EAST END PE PLANTING PLAN t-Ne44 Wca. 4rovc}►•e GS o nom pm,: At, Aro4,6.o1 o.s c`o4e6. v.4 •30• V2 CA .o"C �t Q 7v*•%w� F 0 1 • itj/ � F ' , fila • Jim Haggerton, Mayor Dep rtmentt of Commtgredi y etleimc ntt Jack Pace, Director STAFF REPORT To the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) and Planning Commission (PC) Prepared January 20, 2011 HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: OWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: ASSOCIATED PERMITS: SEPA DETERMINATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: STAFF: January 27, 2011 On January 12, 2011 two public notice boards were posted on the site. Additionally, on January 13, 2011, a combined Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing were mailed to the property owners and tenants within 500 feet of the subject site. A Notice of Public Hearing was also published in the Seattle Times on January 13, 2011. L10-077, Public Hearing Design Review Approval and L11-004, Parking Variance Application Howard Kimura on behalf of Taco Time Hawley Enterprises Inc Taco Time has submitted applications for construction of a new 2,381 square feet restaurant along with other site improvements including parking and landscaping. Specifically, Taco Time is requesting the Board of Architectural Review for approval of the design review application. Additionally the proposal includes a request to the Planning Commission for 25% reduction in the minimum parking requirements for the proposed use. 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Building/Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing Permits Sign Permits Exempt Regional Commercial (RC) Regional Commercial (RC) Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map B: Construction Plans C. Applicant's Response to Design Review Narrative D. Photo Rendering of Proposed Taco Time Restaurant E: Applicant's Response to Parking Variance Criteria FINDINGS BACKGROUND Taco Time is proposing to construct a new 2,381 square foot building at 15037 Tukwila International Blvd (TIB). The applicant submitted a complete design review application on December 21, 2011. During review of the application, staff determined that the proposed application did not comply with the City's minimum parking requirements for fast food restaurants. On January 13, 2011, the applicant submitted a Special Permission application requesting a 25 percent reduction in the minimum parking requirements for the proposed use. A request for a parking reduction in excess of 10 percent requires the approval of the Planning Commission (TMC 18.56.140). The staff report has been divided into two sections. The first section covers the Design Review application and the second covers the Special Permission Application for the parking reduction. Staff's conclusions and recommendations for the design review application and the parking reduction request follow each respective section. The staff report has been arranged as follows: Design Review Application A. Review of TIB Design Review Criteria B. Design Review Conclusions C. Design Review Recommendations II. Special Permission Application A. Review Criteria B. Special Permission Conclusions C. Special Permission Recommendations VICINITY/SITE INFORMATION Existing Development The project site is located at 15037 TIB and is zoned regional commercial (RC). Currently the site consists of two buildings, Trudy's Tavern a 3096 square foot building located along TIB and an 8640 square foot commercial building located along Military Road S. Also located on the site is parking which is utilized by both buildings on the property. Currently the site consists of three tax parcels with a total area of 58,655 square feet. The north property will stand alone after the Taco Time construction and will have sufficient parking for the existing building square footage on the site. B. Miles Page 2 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 f Existing Trudey's Tavern (will be demolished) Existing Commercial Building (to remain Proposed Development The applicant is proposing to combine the three parcels into two parcels. The north parcel will retain the existing commercial building located along Military Road and sufficient parking will be provided for the existing uses on the site. Trudy's Tavern will be demolished and a new 26,512 square foot parcel will be created to the south. This new parcel will be the site for the applicant's proposed 2,381 square foot Taco Time Restaurant and is the only parcel proposed for site improvements. The proposed Taco Time will include a drive through window. A restaurant with a drive through is an outright permitted use in the RC zoning (TMC 18.24.020 (41) (a)). As part of the application, the applicant proposes to install a small plaza area along TIB; install landscaping; and construct other site improvements. A total of 28 parking stalls will be located on the Taco Time Parcel. Frontage improvements along Military will be constructed per the City's development standards. Surrounding Land Uses The Taco Time project site is located within the Tukwila International Boulevard Corridor (See Attachment A). The site sits between TIB to the east and Military Road South to the west. At this B. Miles Page 3 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 location, Military Road is within the City of SeaTac's jurisdiction. TIB at this location is restricted to right in and right out. Military Rd South allows full access. All surrounding properties, that are within the City of Tukwila, are zoned RC. Surrounding land uses, both in Tukwila and SeaTac include commercial uses. Bank property to the South Commercial building on Westside of Military Public Comments As of January 21, 2010, the City has received no written comments. SECTION I. DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION A. Review of TIB Design Review Criteria The property is zoned Regional Commercial (RC) and is located within the Tukwila International Blvd. study area. Design review is required for all new construction activities located within the Tukwila International Blvd study area (TMC 18.24.070). B. Miles Page 4 01/20/2011 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc TMC 18.060.050 (D) requires that all projects located in the Tukwila International Blvd Corridor be reviewed using the Tukwila International Boulevard Design Manual (TIBDM). Below are all of the sections in the TIBDM followed by a discussion of the project. For the applicant's response to the criteria, see Attachment C. The manual is organized into four sections; covering Site Design, Building Design, Landscape Design and Signs. Within each section are a number of subject areas, covering such issues as pedestrian circulation, architectural relationships, planting design and sign placement. For each subject areas, there are one or more Design Criteria, which are general in nature. The Design Criteria explains requirements for development proposals. They are the decision criteria by which the Board of Architectural Review will decide whether to approve, condition or deny a project. The Design Guidelines, which augment each Design Criteriarovide g idancto the proj to City Staff and to the BAR in determining whether the project meets the Design Cr to iaect applicant, i. Site Desi it a. Site Design Concept The TTBDM notes that the site design should provide an orderly and easily understood arrangement of buildings, landscaping, and circulation elements that support the functions of the site. The applicant has chosen to locate the building as close to TIB while at the same time maintaining the existing driveway. TIB at this location is angled and extends NW to SW. The angle of TIB provides an opportunity for the building, while not located directly along the street, to be somewhat prominent to motorists (See Attachment A and Attachment B, Sheet 1). The ability to move cars on the site is the driving force in the design of the site. However, the site also makes provisions for pedestrian circulation. Like all restaurants of this tye, a drive through will be part of the use. The applicant is proposing to utilize existing curb cuts from both TIB and window Military which impacts the layout of the building. The access from TIB is not a typical right angle, due to the alignment of TIB to the property. This design element will assist in ensuring that drivers slow as they enter the parking lot (Attachment B, Sheet 1). Access to the drive through window is located on the western portion of theroe The proposed site plan indicates that a total of ten cars can be stacked in the drive through lane. When a motorist has completed picking up their order in the drive through window they have the option of exiting onto TIB that is restricted to right turn only or turning around to access Military Road. Exiting onto Military will allow motorists to utilize the intersection at TIB and S. 152"d Street which would allow them to have left turns onto TIB (Attachment A and Attachment B, Sheet 1). The applicant has provided three raised walkways within the parking area as a means to slow traffic down within the parking area. Another raised walkway is provided through the drive through lane. A total of 28 parking stalls are provided for the building. These parking stalls are primarily located along the north property line with a few parking stalls being located to the west of the building (Attachment B, Sheet 1). Three pedestrian connections are provided on theroe One leads from Military Road South to a building entrance on the west wall and there are two pedestrian connections from TIB (Attachment B, Sheets 1, 2, 3, and 4). B. Miles 5 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Ta oage Time.doc 01/20/2011 is ed on e northeast A small plaza area which is separated from the main leadsgto this plaza area. An outdoor seat ng area rner of the property. One of the pedestrian connections from is located outside of the building's west wall. The pedestrian connection from Military runs along this outdoor seating area (Attachment B, Sheet 1). b. Relationship to Street Front The TIBDM notes that the site design should create of the TIBDMistinct street is toand createminimize pede parkingan friendly between structures and the street. One of the primary purposes environment and to ensure that private development reinforces and augments the public street improvements for pedestrians. As noted, the property is bordered by both TIB and Military Road South. The TIBDM specifically notes that TIB will be considered the major public street and other surrounding streets will be secondary. ll The applicant's building design pushes the building as close to is locateTIB between theas ebu ldingwhile iand TIB maintaining A mall maneuverability for the drive through lane. Noparking plaza area is also located along TIB. Existing frontage improvements are in place along TIB and no additional improvements are needed (Attachment B, Sheet 1). b The TIBDM calls for one building entrance to along ovision r Sheets 1 s 2 e3 and ming met by locating two doors at the NE corner of the building along TIB (Attachment B 4). The applicant will construct improvements along Military as required by the City's development standards. These improvements will need to be coordinated with the City of SeaTac. c. Street Corners Not applicable. d. Continuity of Site with Adjacent Sites The TIBDM seeks to have projects maintain a visual and functional continuity between the proposed development and adjacent and neighboring properties. This can be done through the use of setbacks, building massing, circulation, and landscaping. at The design of this site is consistent with the design of ello ate directly across the street.C fast food restaurant n 20036 the Tukwila International Blvd and the McDonalds restaurant existing Burger King was demolished and replaced like the bKFC Taco Time site utilizeda plaza area aject to ong review approval (L03-011). The KFC site, proposed TIB. Additionally, in 2008 McDonalds built a plaza directly is proposed for the Taco Tirestaurant. acks for the KFC and McDonalds are near identical to the front setback B. Miles Page 6 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 McDonald's Plaza Area The TIBDM encourages joint access driveways and pedestrian connections to adjacent properties. At this time there are no opportunities to incorporate shared access driveways into the design of the site. When the City completed the TIB improvements it provided existing curb cuts to all the surroundin commercial properties and no changes are proposed as part of this proposal. g Pedestrian connections between adjacent properties are provided by using adjacent public sidewalks (Attachment B, Sheet 1). e. Shared Facilities The TIBDM encourages applicants to utilize shared facilities such as common building walls, shared driveways, landscaping or other shared facilities. The proposal is for a stand alone fast food restaurant with a drive through window, therefore there is no opportunity to incorporate any shared facilities. I Site Design for Safety As noted, there will be four pedestrian walkways located on the property. Three of the pedestrian connections lead from a public street (two from TIB and one from Military). There is one pedestrian connection which connects the northern parking stalls to the restaurant. All the pedestrian connections will extend through drive lanes. In order to define the pedestrian space, the applicant has proposed to have the four walkways be raised and have a design which distinguishes the walkways from the surrounding drive lane (Attachment B, Sheet 1). Directional signs are used throughout the site design to assists motorists in navigating the sign'. The proposed building faces the outdoor parking area which will allow patrons to have an unobstructed view of the parking area and the small plaza area (Attachment B, Sheets 1, 2, 3, and 4). Outdoor lighting fixtures are provided throughout the site. Lighting fixtures are also provided at key ' Encouraged by TIBDM.F.1 B. Miles 7 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Ta oage Ti e.doc 01/20/2011 locations of the building, such as at the drive through window and building entrances. Attachment B, Sheet 10 is an outdoor light plan for the project. g. Siting and Screening of Service Areas The only proposed service area on the site will be the dumpster enclosure located on the northwest corner of the property. As shown in Attachment B, Sheet 1, the applicant is proposing a CMU block enclosure with a stucco finish to match the building. A metal door will be used to provide access to the CMU enclosure. The enclosure is also surrounding by a significant amount of landscaping, including three trees (See Attachment B, Sheet 6). h. Natural Features and Sensitive Areas This criteria is not applicable for the proposed project. This is a redevelopment of an existing site. The existing site is about 99 percent covered with impervious surfaces (buildings, parking lot, and drive lanes) and there are no existing trees on the site. i. Stormwater Detention Facilities The applicant will utilize a below grade stormwater facility for the project (Attachment B, Sheet 9). j. Pedestrian Circulation As noted, pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site. Two of the pedestrian connections will provide access from TIB. One of the access points from TIB will go through the small plaza area located along the NE corner of the property. A third walkway is located from Military Road South. This walkway will extend through a small outdoor seating area before terminating at the building's west entrance. A forth pedestrian connection extends from the parking stalls located along the north property line to the proposed building. As is encouraged by the TIBDM, the walkways will be constructed from a material which will be distinct from the surrounding drive aisles (Attachment B, Sheet 1). k Pedestrian Amenities The site will feature a small plaza area located in the NE corner of the property, directly along TIB (Attachment B, Sheet 1). Three outdoor tables will be provided within this area. A specific design of the tables has not bee provided. The Tukwila Police Department reviewed the application and requested that the landscaping be toned down in the area in order to increase visibility of people within the plaza area and that a low fence be installed around the plaza area to denote private ownership of the plaza area. Both of these recommendations have been incorporated into the site design (See Attachment B, Sheet 1). A six foot, black chainlink fence will be utilized along the north edge of the pedestrian plaza. This chainlink fence will intersect with an existing brick wall located within the City's right of way. A small outdoor seating area has been provided between Military Road South and the building. Two outdoor seating tables have been provided. A specific design of the tables has not bee provided (Attachment B, Sheet 1). 1. Vehicular Circulation The main vehicular access to the site is via an access point from TIB and one from Military Road South. 01/20/2011 B. Miles Page 8 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc These two access points create a drive lane that directly connects Military to TIB. To slow motorists who enter the site from TIB the drive aisle has been curved. Parking is located along the north property line and between Military Road and the building (Attachment B, Sheet 1). The applicant is proposing a restaurant with a drive through west property line from Military road south and then extends he length of he ep roh ertyh lane starts southe the property line. The drive through lane can accommodate a total of ten vehicles. Vehic es exitingxalong the drive through window can exit onto TIB or turn around the building and exit onto Military Road South (Attachment B, Sheet 1). m. Parking Per the City parking regulations the proposed use is required to be parked at one stall for every 50 square of usable floor area. Usable floor area is defined as "[T]hat part of the floor area of any structure which is actually used from time to time for any commercial purposes, such as sales area, display area, walkway or storage area. Parking calculation shall not include common corridors designed for the circulation of people at non -retail establishments, restrooms, elevator shafts and stairwells at each floor, mechanical equipment rooms or attic spaces and exterior covered loading docks (TMC 18.060.863)". Using the above definition it was determined that the proposed use had a usable floor area of 1,919 square feet. Thus the site is required to have 38 stalls. The site plan provided as Attachment B, Sheet 1 shows a total of 28 stalls, ten less than required by code. The applicant has requested that the Planning Commission approve parking variance of 25 percent for the proposed use. A discussion on the applicant's parking variance request is discussed later in this staff report. A majority of the parking stalls have been located along the north property line. Five parking stalls, including the two ADA stalls, have been located west of the building. As required by the TMC, bicycle parking will be located along the NW corner of the building. ii.. Building Design a. Architectural Concepts The TIBDM notes that the, "...architectural design of a proposed project must demonstrate a strong unifying concept, clear organization and a consistent architectural character or stylet". The applicant has proposed an architectural character that is consistent with a southwestern themed structure. First, the colors selected by the applicant are earth tone and include browns and greens. A stone base is used around all four sides of the building. The same stone is also used to create the column elements at the main entrance on the north elevation of the building. The main entrance also includes a tower element which highlights the main entrance. The north and south elevations incorporate slight building modulation. Additional articulation is also provided by the colors and materials used for the building. Essentially, the applicant has created a base, middle, and cap feature for the building. Cement plaster and metal coping is used to create a distinct roof edge (Attachment B, Sheets, 2, 3, 4 and Attachment D). 2 p. 45 B. Miles 9 W:1Users\BRANDOMCombined Staff Report, Ta oage Time.doc 01/20/2011 No other buildings will be located on the site. The only other structure on the site will be the trash enclosure. The plans note that the trash enclosure will be CMU with a stucco finish to match the restaurant building (Attachment B, Sheet 1). b. Architectural Relationships The TIBDM encourages, "...continuity between the proposed development and adjacent and neighboring structures when these structures demonstrate an appropriate level of architectural quality". The applicant correctly notes that the surrounding structures are not appropriate to emulate given their size (bank to the south) and overall quality of construction. The applicant notes that the proposed Taco Time is consistent in design with other restaurants in the area. This is the fourth fast food site within the TIB corridor to undergo a major renovation in the last seven yearsears. In 2003 KFC redeveloped the old Burger King site at 15036 TIB and Jack in the Box made major} improvements at the old KFC site at the NW corner of S. 144th St and TIB. A new McDonalds was constructed across the street from the project site in 2008. The Taco Time project includes several elements which were also present with those other three projects. These elements include tower elements which provide prominence to the sites and the use of awnings to highlight entrances and to provide visual interest to the buildings. Rebuilt McDonalds on TIB c. Building Elements, Details, and Materials Given the angle of TIB at the project site, the north elevation will be prominent to drivers along the street. The north elevation is essentially the "front" of the building. The design of the building utilizes several awnings along the north elevation. These awnings assist in reducing the mass of the building and provide horizontal modulation. A tower element is also used along the north elevation at the main entrance of the building. The applicant has also proposed to install a corner entrance feature along the NE corner of the building which is encouraged in the TIBDM. This entrance will be prominent to drivers traveling south on TIB. Windows are provided along all building facades. These windows allow patrons within the building to view the parking area, TIB and Military Road S. Exterior building lighting is located on all facades (Attachment B, Sheets 2, 3 and 4). The driving force for the choice of materials for the site is durability. The applicant has chosen to use stone, cement plaster, metal awnings, and metal coping (Attachment B, Sheets 2, 3, 4 and Attachment D). B. Miles Page 10 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 Dark bronze light fixtures will be located throughout the parking lot (Attachment B, Sheet 10) d. Pedestrian Oriented Features The TIBDM defines a pedestrian -friendly facade as those that feature one or more of the following elements: a. Transparent window area or window displays along at least half the length of the ground floor facade. b. Sculptural, mosaic, or base -relief art work along at least half the length of the ground floor facade. c. At Least 500 SF of pedestrian oriented space located along or adjacent to the public or private sidewalks(s), for every 100 linear feet of ground facade that face the public street(s). d. Other measures that meet the intent of the criteria, as approved in conjunction with the overall design review approval. Over half the length of the north elevation includes windows. These windows will allow patrons within the restaurant to view the parking area, TIB, and Military Road S. The applicant has also located three doors to provide access to the restaurant. All three doors can be accessible from the walkways that extend from the Military Road South or TIB. The applicant has also proposed one plaza area along TIB and another outdoor seating area on the site (Attachment B, Sheets 1, 2, 3, and 4). e. Mechanical Equipment Rooftop mechanical equipment will be placed below the parapet of the building. iii Landscape Design a Landscape Design There is currently no landscaping located on the project site. The perimeter landscaping requirements in the Regional Commercial zone are as follows: Front and Second Front ----Ten feet of Type I landscaping Side Five feet of Type II landscaping The purpose of Type I landscaping is "to enhance Tukwila's streetscapes, provide a light visual separation between uses and zoning districts, screen parking areas, and allow views to building entryways and signage (TMC 18.52.030 (A) (1))". The TMC notes the purpose of Type II landscaping is to "...enhance Tukwila's streetscape, provide a moderate visual separation between uses and zoning districts, screen blank walls and parking areas, and allow views to building entryways and signage (TMC 18.52.030 (B)(1))". Type I landscaping is proposed on both TIB and Military Road South. Ash trees are used as the main tree within these landscaped areas. A variety of shrubs and ground cover is also proposed to be planted (Attachment B, Sheet 6). B. Miles Page 11 WAllsers\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 Type II landscaping will be installed along the north and south property lines. The landscaping on the south property line will assist in screening the drive through lane and the south facade which lacks the architectural features of the other walls. A six-foot black vinyl coated chainlink fence will be installed along the north and south property lines. (Attachment B, Sheet 1) Landscaping is also proposed around the plaza area along T1B and around the outdoor seating area on the project site. A four foot black chanlink fence is proposed around the plaza area. The fence will connect to an existing brick wall located within the City's ROW. b. Planting Design The applicant has selected tree and shrub species that are native to the Pacific Northwest and that are drought tolerant. The site currently contains no trees. As designed, the landscaping will provide some visual buffering, but will also allow viewing of some key areas such as the parking area and TIB plaza area (Attachment B, Sheet 6). iv. SiMns The proposed Taco Time is the first new building to be constructed under the City's new sign code. The applicant has proposed a total of four wall signs on the building. These signs are permitted under the new sign code3. The project site is also permitted to have one monument sign which the applicant is proposing to install along TIB. The applicant has not provided details on the design of the monument sign. Smaller directional signs are also proposed within the development. These smaller signs will assist with way finding for motorists. B. DESIGN REVIEW CONCLUSION Site Design a. The proposed site design is appropriate for the functional needs of the proposed use. The site design will allow cars and pedestrians to utilize the site in an orderly manner. There should be no impacts to adjacent City streets or adjacent properties. b. The proposed site design promotes ease of use, comfort, and safety for employees and visitors to the site. c. The project will provide a "distinct" edge along Tukwila International Blvd. This edge is similar to the KFC site and McDonald's site along TIB. d. The proposed location of the dumpster enclosure allows it to be adequately screened from TIB. e. The proposed use will enhance pedestrian circulation to and from the site. The applicant is proposed three public pedestrian pathways along the site. f The site will have no shared circulation areas or parking with neighboring commercial properties. However, there are practical considerations for why shared facilities can not be accommodated with the proposed project. Adjacent sidewalks are available to access the site. g. The proposed parking is the minimum necessary to serve the proposed use (See Parking Variance Discussion in section 2 of this staff report). Additionally, the applicant has designed the site layout to break up the appearance of large paved areas. 3 A separate sign permit is required for the installation of these signs. The signs shown on the plans are for reference only, the exact size will be determined at the time of sign permit issuance. B. Miles Page 12 01/20/2011 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc h. The applicant has not provided detailed design of pedestrian amenities such as benches for the plaza area. A detailed design of the pedestrian amenities shall be provided as part of the building permit review process. ii. Building Design a. The proposed building design is consistent with other similar redevelopment proposals along TIB. The building takes advantage of its prominent location by incorporating unique and distinctive architectural features. The project will also add visual interest and identifiable elements to the streetscape. b. The building utilizes durable, high quality building materials that contribute to the overall appearance, ease of maintenance, and longevity of the building. c. The applicant has adequately screened from view all roof top mechanical equipment. iii. Landscape Design a. The plant material selected for the site will be harmonious with the choice of colors for the buildings on the site. b. The added landscaping will significantly improve the urban environment along this portion of Tukwila International Blvd. c. No pruning of trees shall be allowed. iv. Signage a. The proposed signage is compatible with the proposed building design. The applicant has taken advantage of the opportunities provided by the new sign code. However, the design of the monument sign and the internal information signs shall be consistent with the overall design theme on the property. C. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Design Review application with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a sign permit for the monument sign on the property, the applicant shall submit plans that demonstrate that the monument signs will have a design and use materials that are consistent with the finishes of the building. 2. The Director shall approve the final design of the internal informational signs on the property. The signs must have a design and utilize color(s) which are consistent with the building's design and color scheme. 3. The Director shall approve the design of the individual tables within the outdoor plaza area and outdoor seating areas prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. B. Miles Page 13 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01 /20/2011 SECTION II. SPECIAL PERMISSION APPLICATION FOR 25% PARKING REDUCTION Request The City's zoning code requires that fast food restaurants have one parking stalls per 50 square feet of usable floor area. A traditional sit-down restaurant is required to have one stall for every 100 square feet of usable floor area. A fast food restaurant is distinguished from a sit down restaurant typically by how the food served. Restaurants that use disposable containers are considered fast food'. The City only requires parking for "usable floor" area and not for the gross building square footage. Usable floor area is defined as "[T]hat part of the floor area of any structure which is actually used from time to time for any commercial purposes, such as sales area, display area, walkway or storage area. Parking calculation shall not include common corridors designed for the circulation of people at non -retail establishments, restrooms, elevator shafts and stairwells at each floor, mechanical equipment rooms or attic spaces and exterior covered loading docks (TMC 18.060.863)". The proposed Taco Time has a gross area of 2,381 square feet (Attachment B, Sheet 1). Using the definition of usable floor area listed above, the usable floor area for the proposed Taco Time would be 1,919 square feet. Taco Time is a hybrid between the fast food and sit-down restaurant definition. The applicant's site plan shows a total of 28 parking stalls (Attachment B, Sheet 1). Using the fast food parking calculation, the applicant is required to have a total of 38 parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a reduction of 25 percent from what is required in the TMC. A. Review Criteria TMC 18.56.140 (B) states the criteria that will be used to evaluate variance from parking standards. The applicant's response is provided as Attachment E of this staff report. A. All shared parking strategies are explored. As was noted earlier in this staff report, the Taco Time will be locating at an existing commercial site. All existing commercial properties are built out and unable to provide excess parking to the proposed Taco Time. B. On site park and ride opportunities are fully explored. Not applicable for the proposed use. C. The site is in compliance with the City's commute trip reduction ordinance, or if not and affected employer as defined by the City's ordinance, agrees to become affected. The project is not subject to the requirements of the City's CTR program as it does not have more than 100 employees. However, granting this parking variance will require that the site participate in the City's CTR program. Given the proposed use, there are limited opportunities to develop a CTR program on the site. The greatest demand for parking will not be from the employees, but will be from customers using the site. However, if a CTR program is implemented for the employees it would reduce the parking 4 TMC 18.06.687 and TMC 18.06.668 B. Miles Page 14 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 demand on the site. The applicant's narrative (Attachment E) incorrectly assumes that participation in the CTR program is about reducing traffic during peak hours; however the intention of participation in such a program is to reduce parking demand thus allowing for a lower parking count on the site. For example, Taco Time could provide employees with transit passes in order to reduce employee parking on the site. Thus, participation in the CTR program is critical to reducing parking demand on the site. D. The site is at least 300 feet away from a single-family residential zone There is no single-family residential zone within 300 -feet of the subject property. E. A report is submitted providing a basis for less parking and mitigation necessary to offset any negative effects The applicant's narrative (Attachment E) notes that the City's parking requirement is the highest required of all the Taco Time locations in Washington and Oregon. The following table shows the gross square footage for Taco Time restaurants in Washington and Oregon and the total number of parking stalls available: On average, the existing corporate Taco Time restaurants in Washington and Oregon have 18 stalls per store, with 68.2 percent of all stores falling into a range between 11.5 and 24.5 parking stalls. The median number of parking stalls for all stores is 17. The proposed Taco Time will have 28 stalls, which is one stall less than the highest parking count listed above (East Marginal Way). The applicant has also notes that 60 percent of the business will be patrons using the drive through window which would reduce the demand for on site parking. As noted, a total of 10 parking spots have been provided to stack cars that are using the drive through window. The site is also located near transit. A Metro bus stop is located within .1 miles of the restaurant and the site can be easily accessed from Light Rail. Access to transit could be used as a way to reduce parking demand created by employees of the new Taco Time; however the availability of transit will likely not B. Miles W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 reduce parking demand created by customers. B. Conclusion The applicant has shown that the proposed Taco Time will have a parking count that is one of the highest of all their stores. The City's parking ratio of one stall for every 50 square feet of usable floor area is a catch all for all fast food restaurants, such as Burger King, Jack in the Box, and McDonalds. One thing that the applicant did not mention, but which advances the applicant's case for a parking reduction, is that Taco Time does not fit easily into the "fast food" definition nor does it fit nicely into the "restaurant" definition. The City distinguishes between a fast food and sit down restaurants by how the food is served (disposable containers vs. non -disposable containers). Food prepared for dine in customers at Taco Time is served in both disposable and non -disposable containers. For example a soft taco is served in a wrapper and thus would be considered fast food, but a taco salad is served on plate and thus would not be considered fast food. Taco Time is essentially a hybrid between a fast food and sit down restaurant. If we were to apply a parking ratio that splits the difference between the fast food parking ratio (1 per 50 every 75 square feet) and sit down restaurant ratio his numberOsquare feet) we would require one the proposed Taco Time would be equlired to have a square feet of usable floor area. Using total of 25 parking stalls (total proposed is 28). Unlike an office or destination use, (the Mosque or Light Rail Station), the proposed Taco Time restaurant is not a destination. Users will choose to go there and if they are unable to find parking, would likely use the drive through window or would choose to go elsewhere for food. Thus, the impact of not providing enough parking in this case would be loss of business to the applicant AND not impacts to adjacent properties. The site is also designed in a manner that encourages pedestrian connectivity. Motorists who live or work in the area may choose to walk to the site instead of driving. The pedestrian accessibility would assist in reducing parking demand on the site. Finally, the site has good access to transit which could help reduce parking demand created by employees. Reducing the number of required parking stalls for the restaurant is also consistent with the goals of redeveloping TIB. The TIBDM encourages that parking, where possible, be limited. Goal M.1 states, "Minimize the amount of space devoted to parking by taking advantage of shared parking and/or methods for reducing parking demand...". As further noted, the intent of this goal is to: • To minimize the visual impact of large paved areas; • To increase site utilization by reducing the amount of land area devoted to automobile parking; and • To increase the attractiveness of TIB for pedestrians. Based upon the information presented to the City, the reduction of parking on the site by 25 percent is warranted. The applicant has provided parking information, which demonstrates that sufficient parking will be available on the site. However, monitoring should be used to ensure that there are no off-site parking issues created by the reduction in the total number of parking stalls. B. Miles Page 16 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 C. Staff's Recommendation The parking variance should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The site is now subject to the City's CTR program. 2. One year from the date of granting of final occupancy by the City, the applicant shall submit a parking utilization survey which outlines the parking utilization created by the site. The parking utilization survey must document the average demand (customers and employees) created by the site during the lunch rush (11:30 A.M to 1:30) and dinner rush (5:00 P.M to 7:00 P.M). If impacts are identified the report must include measures to reduce parking demand, including reducing parking demand created by employees. B. Miles age 17 W:\Users\BRANDON\Combined Staff Report, Taco Time.doc 01/20/2011 Taco Time Site i Vicinty Map N 515 ft CityGIS Copyright © 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. Attachment A 41/ H.G. KIMURA ARCHITECT. PI IC December 20, 2010 City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Q a=d-cG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: Written Discussion of Project Consistency with Decision Criteria Proposed Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Howard G. Kimura, Principal CRITERIAL FOR B.A.R. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN T.I.B. CORRIDOR ( TMC 18.60.030 and 18.60.060c) 1. SITE DESIGN: a. Site Design Concept: The site has been organized so that visibility of the Taco Time is very prominent along Tukwila International Blvd, the prime arterial. The existing approach is being reused due to the location of adjacent driveways of already developed sites. As one drives southbound on T.I.B., the driver will inevitably need to slow down in order to negotiate a right turn into the site, then turn right to drive along the north side of the building. Then, there will be two raised walks to slow vehicular traffic down for pedestrian crossings. The drive thru lane, which is essentially 65% of the business sales, has been located as far from T.I.B. as possible in order to avoid any lines from conflicting with traffic. The drive thru lane has a 10 -stall capacity when the norm may be around 7-8 stalls. The driveways from T.I.B. and Military Road have been offset purposely in order to minimize thoroughfare traffic. Landscaping will be used to surround the perimeter of the site per the TMC. The above will ensure upgrading the overall visual appearance of the T.I.B. corridor and will increase the ease of site use by building placement and design of the vehicle path. b. Relationship to the Street Front: The building has been placed as close to T.I.B. as possible. The front of the building and primary entrance face T.I.B and assists in maintaining the "street edge" of buildings. An 8' pedestrian walkway services the front of the building from the sidewalk on T.I.B. We have also added a pedestrian seating area along the NE corner of the building per Planning Department request and this area connects the public sidewalk with the seating plaza and then connects to the building entrance via a raised walkway when crossing the vehicular path. The building placement ensures consistency to the street "edge" and creates a safe pedestrian environment by having one access point from each of the public ways to the building. The pedestrians entering from the street will have one choice from each street to avoid crossing the major two-way traffic lanes. However, they will need to cross the drive thru lane which is more controlled. Attachment C 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 • email: hgkimura@comcast.net Written Dis ion Proposed T ime December 20, 2010 Page 4 2. BUILDING DESIGN: • a. Architectural Concepts: The architectural design concept of the building allow for a nice stone base wainscot and accent stone entry columns creating a desirable building facade and noticeable entry. Warmer colors of cement plaster fmish will surround the building and an accent sloped canopy in dark green will create more modulation to minimize the vertical walls of the one- story building. The building bumps out to conform to drive thru window needs and windows will wrap the building in the dining room area. The trash enclosure is the only other structure on this site and will be similarly designed to go along with the development. b. Architectural Relationships The subject building is the only new building between the north and south neighboring sites and it is our desire to make this structure a nice desirable place to dine. Since the structures to the north are from the 1950's to 1960's era, it is not desirable to follow any design features from these buildings since, as your review criteria states, "they do not demonstrate an appropriate level of architectural quality." The bank to the south is a classic design and still looks decent but the scale of this building is very tall for a one-story structure to follow. Across the street, there are other quick -serve restaurants that have similar finishes as ours, but ours will have more muted colors and will not be as loud, which we believe would be a positive element in the character of T.I.B. c. Building Elements, Details and Materials: The subject one-story building is elevated to a nice scale and the overhanging awnings contribute to pedestrian friendly amenities. The building proposed will have a base defined with the stone wainscot, a mid-section with cement plaster and an entablature or top defined by two accent bands. The building will have very durable materials for the Northwest climate including stone wainscoting, cement plaster, metal awnings and metal coping at the top of the building. The entry will have a distinctive architectural entry feature with the full height stone columns, easily identified by customers as the primary "entry" Entrys will also have wall sconces to provide additional lighting at these key areas. d. Pedestrian -Oriented Features: The building will have pedestrian -oriented features facing T.I.B., Military Road and the parking lot areas. These areas will have windows with awnings above and a nice stone wainscot. In addition, there will be low height shrubs in the sidewalks fronting the doors to create a greater buffer from the sidewalk to the parking access aisle. These awnings will provide a form of weather protection as one enters and exits the building. The full height stone columns in the primary entry will aesthetically be a distinctive architectural feature. All of these pedestrian features will contribute to the experience of our customers in walking to, within and among businesses along T.I.B. 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 • 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgkimura@comcast.net Written Disclion Proposed Taco Time December 20, 2010 Page 5 e. Mechanical Equipment: The rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened with the top parapet of the building. It is has extra height (approx. 4-5') to screen items such as rooftop HVAC units, cooling condensers and kitchen exhaust fans. The gas meters and electrical service has been placed in the rear of the building along the west side within the landscaped areas. We also wish to reduce the negative impact of mechanical equipment. 3. LANDSCAPE DESIGN: a. Landscape Design: The subject landscape design demonstrates a clear and appropriate aesthetic statement and conforms directly with the Tukwila Municipal Code section 18.52 as close as we can apply these standards to the site. Screening from major arterials has been placed between the streets and the site and the drive thru lane has been screened with lower height shrubs to conceal the headlights of cars that may be lined up at night. Small landscape planters were created to provide a small landscape buffer between the entry doors and the vehicular drive aisles as another buffer between pedestrians and cars. Additionally, there are raised concrete curbs that separate these areas. The frontage buffers along both T.I.B. and Military Road will enhance both public streetscapes as specified in the TMC. b. Planting Design: The landscape architect chose species of plants and trees to allow screening to buffer streets to site development, however, to allow see thru capabilities so the site amenities can be seen and enjoyed. Screening to buffer, yet allowing the building "edge" lines to be apparent are important aspects of design. Plant species have been chosen based upon how it needs to buffer various spaces, the orientation, site location and planter size. Species that are hardy and allow for minimal maintenance have also been selected by our landscape architect so they remain alive and can survive our various seasons. No significant plantings were existing to remain. 4. SIGNS: a. Signage Concept: A monument sign along T.I.B. has been placed so that it can be integrated with the proposed landscaping and as the trees in the front buffer mature, that they will not block the signage. Higher canopy trees will be used and will be pruned to maintain sight lines to the signage so that new comers can read our identification signs effectively. A freestanding cactus pole sign is proposed for Military Road since these will not be covered with the buffering trees. The main entry sign above the door will be different than the other wall signs and will have the Taco Time's signature cactus. The other three wall signs along the East, West and South walls will be a wall sign that spells out "Taco Time." These are strictly informational for new passerby traffic. Small directional signs will be used to show "Drive Thru Entry" and "Do Not Enter." Menu board signs will be used along the drive thru lane to show the restaurant menu and prices. 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE a Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 • email: hgkimura@comcast.net Written Disillion Proposed TWrime December 20, 2010 Page 6 • b. Sign Placement: Identification monument signs and freestanding signs along T.I.B. and Military Road, respectively, will be placed so that they are visible to the motoring public from a vantage point of approximately 4'-6' above street grade. Directional signage on-site will be used primarily to direct vehicular traffic to and from the drive thru lane. Freestanding signs and monuments signs will both be integrated within the landscaping areas and the planting adjacent to these signs will be appropriate and will enhance the signs. c. Sign Design: Forethought for both day and night time viewing has been considered in the design and placement of the sign. Signs will be internally illuminated for night time viewing. Color selection will be appropriate and readable for daytime viewing as well. All signs will be constructed from durable metal frames and plastic inserts that will be durable from the elements and will be constructed by sign professionals that are deeply anchored in the sign making industry thereby looking professional in appearance. These professional signs will help improve the visual appearance of T.I.B. corridor and will allow easy readable signs for patrons to enter the site. 5. Consistency with Adopted Plans and Regulations (TMC 18.100.030) The subject development is zoned Regional Commercial (RC) and currently has an eating establishment (Trudy's Tavern) on it. The subject Taco Time is a quick -serve restaurant with drive thru and is an "allowed outright" use in the TMC. The comprehensive plan for the T.I.B. corridor is for Regional Commercial uses which typically include those with heavier vehicular travel uses. Yet, with vehicular traffic safety in mind, we can implement measures to employ safety for the pedestrians moving on and offsite with the vehicular traffic. At least, we wish to mitigate the dangers as much as possible. The building has been sited conforming to the building setbacks of the TMC of 20' front yards, 10' 2nd front yards and 10' side yard setbacks. The parking requirements are 1 stall for every 50 sf of usable building area. This calculates out to 38 stalls. The subject development has 28 stalls and is short however, we were told that if we can achieve an enhanced pedestrian access path from both street fronts to the building, the Design Review Board may grant us a decision to allow less than the code may required. Also, the T.I.B. guidelines require that the applicant minimize the use of expansive parking areas for more usable pedestrian areas. We have done this with a pedestrian plaza seating area along the NE corner and west of the building. The NE Corner pedestrian plaza required two stalls to be removed in order to accommodate. 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE ■ Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 ■ Fax: 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgkimura@comcast.net Written Discn Proposed Taco ime December 20, 2010 Page 7 The landscaping conforms to a 10' landscape screen along T.I.B. and 10'landscape screen along Military Road and 5' landscape screens along each of the side yards. All designs have been completed by a registered landscape architect licensed to practice in the state of Washington. END OF CRITERIA FOR B.A.R. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN T.I.B. CORRIDOR 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 • 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 • email: hgkimura@comcast.net Attachment D • • H.G. KIMURA ARC:111TrCT, PI Il January 14, 2011 Mr. Brandon Miles, Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Parking Variance to Reduce Total Stalls Required Proposed Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Analysis of Development Standard Requirements: Property Zone: Existing Use: Proposed Use: Building Area: Site Area: Parking Required: Parking Provided: Proposed Deviation: Regional Commercial (RC) Trudy's Tavern Taco Time Restaurant with Drive-Thru 2,381 sf 26,458 sf or .61 Acres 1 stall per 50 sf of "Usable area" 1,919 sf Usable Area / 50 = 38 stalls required 28 stalls provided Howard G. Kimura, Principal The subject proposal intends to utilize 28 parking stalls, 10 short of what the current Tukwila Municipal Code requires. Note, two stalls were removed from the layout in order to provide an outdoor pedestrian plaza area at Planning Department's request. The next section will discuss the proposed deviation's consistency with the decision criteria. Criteria is bolded and responses are italicized for clarity. 18.56.140 Variance Criteria from Parking Standards B. Criteria: 1. All Requests for reductions in parking shall be reviewed under the criteria established in this section. See below for review criteria and responses. 2. A reduction may be allowed, pursuant to either a variance reviewed and heard by the Planning Commission if greater than 10 stall reduction, after: a. All shared parking strategies are explored: No shared parking is available to the north, south or west as these are already fully developed sites that support their own uses and do not have extra to dedicate. To the East, is Tukwila International Blvd. Shared parking strategies create unwanted encumbrances on adjacent sites and create less flexibility for future uses, unless the future use is compatible with the Taco Time Use. 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 ■ 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 • email: hg Attachment E Variance Request January 14, 2011 Page 2 • • b. On-site park and ride opportunities are fully explored: Again, no opportunities for park and ride since hours vary due to demand times for lunch/dinner crowds. Individual employees not only vary in when they start, but can vary how long they work that day. Refer to item 2c below. c. The site is in compliance with the City's commute trip reduction ordinance or, if not an affected employer as defined by the City's ordinance, agrees to become affected. Taco Time does not have more than 100 employees in the City of Tukwila as outlined in your "Commute Trip Reduction Program" nor are they scheduled to begin work between 6am to 9am. There are few key managers that come in around 9am to prepare food and since the restaurant does not open until 10 or 11 am, the employees come in 10 minutes prior to their shift. Since the food business varies around meal times, the number of employees varies based upon the demand. Therefore, by nature of the business, many employees do need to come in on their own to make the work schedule based upon demand d. The site is at least 300' away from a single family residential zone It appears that the subject site is greater than 300' from a residential zone. Primary sites surrounding the sites appear to be commercial in nature. e. A report is submitted providing the basis for less parking and mitigation necessary to offset any negative effects. Refer to attached parking study for 15 Taco Times in three different Counties and refer to item C1 below for the basis for justing less parking. C. Process: 1. An applicant shall submit evidence that decreased parking will not have a negative impact on surrounding properties or potential future uses. Since the subject development is > 10% reduction in parking spaces, Planning Commission approval is required Attached, we have a study of 15 freestanding Taco Time restaurants in King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties. It shows the following: • City • Lot Area • Building Area • Seating Capacity • Description of stalls; compact, standard, handicap • Total Parking Count • Drive Thru Window In showing the 15 comparable sites in three different counties, please note that the total parking "average" on all sites is 22 total parking stalls. The lowest parking count on a site is 12 and the highest is 30. There are no apparent problems at any of the 15 sites with deficiency in the number of stalls to accommodate the business. We believe this would illustrate that the parking demand for Taco Time is fully accommodated with 28 stalls or less on a typical freestanding Taco Time Restaurant. The parking ratio of 1 stall per 50 sf of usable area is the highest ratio that we have seen in the states of Washington and Oregon. However, there are restaurant types that attract more sit-down customers and are much busier than the proposed Taco Time and may require this stringent parking requirement. Our experience with the above 15 sites do not require the amount of parking required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 • 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 • email: hgkimura@comcast.net : Variance Request • January 14, 2011 Page 3 • We have many visitors that actually use the drive-thru window more so than using the restaurant as a dine -in facility. It is important to note that 60% of the business transactions occur at the drive-thru window and that is one reason the parking lot is not fully utilized. Typically, there are 7-8 queuing spaces in the drive thru stacking area however; the subject site has a 10 -car stacking lane. This should provide more than ample parking and queuing for this location. If one were to add the total parking provide plus the number of queuing spaces in the drive-thru lane, we would be able to accommodate 38 cars at the maximum. We don 't anticipate this however. We believe due to the evidence presented above with the history of Taco Time parking, decreased parking will not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties of potential future users. 2. Site Characteristics: a. Site accessibility for transit: The site fronts Tukwila International Blvd and Military Road. There is a transit stop .10 mile away at 152nd & Military Road.. The site is open to pedestrian access from both street fronts and offers an 8' wide sidewalk to access the site. b. Site Proximity to Transit: .10 mile from nearest transit stop at 152nd & Military Rd/Tukwila International Blvd. c. Shared use of on-site parking: We don't anticipate sharing parking with others on our site at this time. d. Shared use of off-site parking: Since majority of surrounding businesses to the south, west and north are occupied and fully developed; there is very little chance for shared parking at this point. e. Combined on-site Parking: We don't anticipate any combined on-site parking f. Employee Density: We anticipate 2 employees at minimum and 8 employees at maximum lunch or dinner rush hour. g. Adjacent Land uses: To the north, there is a large retail store with a sit-down restaurant inside. To the west, there are retail businesses and to the south there is a bank East across TIB, there are other fast food and retail establishments. D. Since the subject request is greater than 10% deviation, we request Planning Commission approval for the parking deviation. We intend to have this variance reviewed and heard by the Planning Commission via a Type 4 decision pursuant to TMC 18.108.040. This concludes our justification for a parking reduction variance. 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 • 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 • email: hgkimura@comcast.net Corporate Lot Sq. Building Seating Parking Total Drive-Thru Restaurant Footage Sq. Footage Capacity Regular CPT H/C Parking Aurora 10,809 1,796 48 13 0 1 14 Yes Bellevue 18,733 3,485 116 20 5 2 27 No Des Moines 26,918 1,920 54 20 0 1 21 Yes East Marginal 20,890 2,361 84 29 0 1 30 Yes Frontier Village 19,275 2457 up 270 down 76 24 0 1 25 Yes Guide Meridian 23,900 2,176 54 17 8 2 27 Yes Maple Valley 12,379 2,256 60 15 0 1 16 Yes Rainier Ave. 14,000 1,834 36 6 12 1 19 Yes Redmond 23,510 3,246 104 21 0 1 22 Yes Rucker 16,553 1,850 48 12 5 1 18 Yes Samish Way 20,662 2,465 88 24 0 2 26 Yes Sammamish Plateau 13,200 2,256 60 11 11 1 23 Yes Shilshole 6,966 1700 up 584 down 66 11 0 1 12 Yes South Hill 25,102 2,484 82 27 0 2 29 Yes Tukwilla 22,712 2,295 66 17 0 2 19 Yes Proposed Tukwila/Seatac 26,458 2,381 68 17 9 2 28 Yes • at* of J uliwita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Associated File Number (s): L10-077, L10-071 Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Mt Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _28 day of _September in the year 2011 Project Name: Taco Time Project Number: PL10-059 Associated File Number (s): L10-077, L10-071 Mailing requested by: Brando Miles Mailer's signature: 776, Mt W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( )US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. ******* NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT ( ) Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( ) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Foster Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept X) City of SeaTac ( City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division - SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes - For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) - Notice to DOE must be by return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (printed out from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director September 26, 2011 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: City of Seatac Planning Department City of Seatac Public Works Department King County Assessor, Accounting Division This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: D11-172 Applicant: Taco Time Corporation Type of Permit Applied for: Development Permit Project Description: CONSTRUCTION OF NEW 2418 SQ FT 1 STORY WOOD FRAME QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT BUILDING, V -B CONSTRUCTION A-2 OCCUPANCY GROUP. PUBLIC WORKS ACTIVITIES INCLUDE: TESC, LAND ALTERING, STORM DRAINAGE, PORTION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS, AND STREET USE FOR TIB. Location: 15037 Tukwila International Blvd, King County Parcel 004100-0493 Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: L10-077, Design Review L10-071, Boundary Line Adjustment L 11-006, Parking Variance PG11-072, Plumbing Permit M11-080, Mechanical Permit EL 11-0871, Electrical Permit EL11-0870, Electrical Permit D11-250, Demolition Permit Regional Commercial (RC) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously: determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Building Official has determined that the application for a Development permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision. A list of conditions is attached. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 1 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. The requirements for an appeal on this Decision are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.116. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. IV. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206.431.367 for further information. Property owners affected by this decisio ay request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for (41 z-iu1 j51 Brandon . Miles, Senior P anner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila er information regarding property tax valuation changes. Page 2 of 2 n • City of Tukwila • Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director March 7, 2011 Mr. Jack Dodge City of Seatac Department of Community Development 4800 South 188th Street SeaTac, WA 98188-8605 RE: Taco Time BLA Application Notice of Decision Dear Mr. Dodge: Please find a copy of the preliminary approval letter for the Taco Time Boundary Line Adjustment application. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431-3684 or send an email to bmiles ' ci.tukwila.w. us. Sincerely Bra i don iles Senior Planner cc. File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 • City of Tukwila y Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director February 11, 2011 Mr. Chris Tonkin 3300 Maple Valley Hwy Renton, WA 98058 RE: Notice of Decision Design Review Application (L10-077) Extension of Appeal Deadline Dear Mr. Tonkin: On January 28, 2011 the City issued a Notice of Decision approving the design review application for the construction of a new Taco Time at 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. The Notice of Decision specified an appeal deadline of Friday, February 11, 2011. This letter is to confirm our conversation and your email which noted that you agreed to extend the appeal deadline until 5:00 PM, Friday, February 18, 2011. Besides the extension of the appeal deadline, all other terms and conditions of the January 28, 2010 Notice of Decision (L10-077) remain in force. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431-3684 or send an email to bmiles c(a�ci.tukwila.wa.us. Ter l Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner cc. City of SeaTac Howard Kimura, Applicant's Representative File (L10-077) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Via US Mail and Electronic Mail Mr. Mike Bryan City of SeaTac 4800 S. 188th Street Seatac, WA 98188-8605 RE: Your Letter dated February 7, 2011 Taco Time Design Review Application (L10-077) Frontage Improvements along Military Road South Dear Mr. Bryan: City of Tukwila staff appreciates meeting with you and other SeaTac development staff on February 3, 2011, to discuss the proposed Taco Time project at 15037 Tukwila International Boulevard ("Project"). The purpose of the meeting was to conduct a discussion between the Cities of Tukwila and SeaTac and the Project Applicant to determine how to best coordinate infrastructure at the boundary between the two cities in relation to the Project. In the meeting we discussed a variety of possible solutions to address the City of SeaTac's concerns with the Project frontage along Military Road South. After the meeting, the Applicant reviewed construction options along Military Road. As we had previously assured you, the City of Tukwila will require that the Project Applicant install frontage improvements along Military Road South. This requirement is already included in the staff report that approved the Project. As it is understood by the City of Tukwila, the only remaining issue is what qualifies as a reasonable extent of improvements given the short frontage of the property and the lack of a design for the road. The City of Tukwila is in receipt of your letter dated February 7, 2011 outlining specific design concerns with the frontage improvements. Until all the design issues have been addressed it seems premature to agree to specific improvements. Once the applicant has completed a design then we can continue the conversation about what improvements will be constructed. Additionally, as the applicant moves forward and has the time to fully design the proposed improvements; other solutions to address your concerns might present themselves. The City of Tukwila received an email from Susan Sanderson dated February 7, 2011, which noted that a response to your letter of February 7, 2011 was required by close of business on Wednesday, February 9, 2011, or the City of SeaTac would file an appeal. It is unclear on what grounds SeaTac would challenge our design review or parking variance decisions. The City of Tukwila's Board of Architectural Review/Planning Commission does not have jurisdiction or authority to approve specific standards for public works infrastructure. As outlined in the City of Tukwila's Design Review Staff Report, the Applicant will construct improvements along Military Road as required. The Board does not delve into the details of H:\Developments\Taco Time, TIB\Letter to Seatac, 2011.02.09.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 • • the improvements (e.g. where the curb line will be located or what type of catch basin will be used). Those standards are left to City staff as outlined by specific ordinance and/or Public Works design manuals. We hope that this letter addresses your concerns about frontage improvements along Military. The question is not if frontage improvements will be installed, but rather exactly what; as we move forward in partnership we will gain a clear picture of what improvements will be installed. If our two cities continue to work cooperatively on this matter we can continue making progress on the Project while addressing SeaTac's concerns at the same time. Accordingly, we propose meeting next week to review the Applicant's preliminary design for the Project frontage improvements. Please provide us dates and times that work for your staff. As everyone agrees, redeveloping this area of south King County is a priority for both cities and we look forward to working with you to successfully complete this Project. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431-3684 or send an email to bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner cc. Steve Lancaster, City Administrator Shelley Kerslake, City Attorney Bob Gibersion, PW Director Nora Gierloff, Deputy DCD Director Robin Tischmak, City Engineer Howard Kimura, Applicant's Representative Chris Tonkin, Taco Time File (L10-077) H:\Developments\Taco Time, TIB\Letter to Seatac, 2011.02.09.doc gir up owl al guftwita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: X Notice of Decision Project Number: PL10-059, L10-077 Design Review Determination of Non-Significance Brandon Miles Notice of Public Meeting i"4/7eliftee< Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached Notice Of Decision on this _28 day of _January in the year 2011 W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: Taco Time Project Number: PL10-059, L10-077 Design Review Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: i"4/7eliftee< W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Howard Kimura, Applicant Chris Tonkin, Applicant Hawley Enterprises, Inc, Property Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology City of SeaTac Jack Pace, Director January 28, 2011 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. Project File Number: Applicant: Type of Permit Applied for: Project Description: Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: I. PROJECT INFORMATION L10-077 Public Hearing Design Review Howard Kimura on behalf of Taco Time Public Hearing Design Review Construction of a new 2,381 square foot restaurant along with other site improvements including parking and landscaping. 15037 Tukwila International Blvd L11-004 Parking Variance Regional Commercial (RC) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 • • Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Board of Architectural Review has determined that the application for a public hearing design review does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a sign permit for the monument sign on the property, the applicant shall submit plans that demonstrate that the monument signs will have a design and use materials that are consistent with the finishes of the building. 2. The Director shall approve the final design of the internal informational signs on the property. The signs must have a design and utilize color(s) which are consistent with the building's design and color scheme. 3. The Director shall approve the design of the individual tables within the outdoor plaza area and outdoor seating areas prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. All trees on the site shall be permitted to achieve their maximum height. Pruning of trees shall be limited to the removal of hazardous or dead branches or if the pruning is done with the purpose of allowing the trees to fully mature. Topping the trees in order to provide better visibility for the building or signage shall not be permitted. 5. The height of the black chain link fence on the north property line shall not exceed a height of four feet. 6. The height of the black chain link fence on the south property line shall be four feet except in that area around the drive through windows where the height may be increased to no more than six feet. The final height configuration on the south property line shall be approved by the Director of Community Development who shall consult with the City's Police Department. 7. Additional building detail shall be added to the east elevation in order to add more visual interest. These building changes could include but are not limited to awnings, landscaping or windows. The Director of DCD shall approve the final design prior to issuance of the building permit. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.104.010. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Board of Architectural Review Decision is permitted. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by February 11, 2011. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 2 of 3 01/28/2011 1:27:00 PM H:\Developments\Taco Time, TIB\NOD Type 4 permit.doc 1 • 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS The Hearing Examiner appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 for further information. Property owners aff cted by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contac e King Co sor s Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Type 4 Permit (except shoreline CUP) BM Page 3 of 3 01/28/2011 1:27:00 PM H:\Developments\Taco Time, TIB\NOD Type 4 permit.doc (027/2011) Brandon Miles - FW: Scan from Color Copier Page 1 • sogmintk From: "Mike Bryan" <mbryan@ci.seatac.wa.us> Q.Q To: <bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us> • '� Date: 01/27/2011 4:40 PM Subject: FW: Scan from Color Copier 90*Cf C� Attachments: SKMBT_C35211012716340.pdf CC: "Susan Sanderson" <ssanderson@ci.seatac.wa.us>, "Mike Bryan" <mbryan@ci.... City of SeaTac Taco Time comments. Mike Bryan Senior Engineering Technician 206-973-4745 Original Message From: konica minolta Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 4:34 PM To: mbryan Subject: Scan from Color Copier Please do not reply to this email. V 4800 South 168th Street SeaTac, WA 98188-8605 City Hall: 206.973.4800 Fax: 206.973.4809 TDD: 206.973.4808 Mayor Tent' Anderson Deputy Mayor Gene Fisher Councilmembers Rick Forschler Tony Anderson Ralph Shape Pam Fernald Mia Gregerson Interim City Manage Todd Cutts City Attomey Mary Mirante Bartolo City Clerk Kristina Gregg January 26, 2011 Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188-8548 RE: Taco Time Design Review Application (L10-077) Public Comment and Parking Variance. Dear Mr. Miles, The City of SeaTac Engineering Division is in receipt of plans and a Drainage Technical Information report (TIR) for the proposed Taco Time at 15037 International Blvd. Tukwila, WA. We have completed our preliminary review and have the following comments: The project shall comply with all the City of SeaTac codes and regulations in regard to the improvements within the Military Road S. right-of-way. 2. City of SeaTac Engineering Division reviewed the existing and post development right-of-way conditions, and has the following comments: • Provide half street improvements on Military Road South as required by the adopted South 154th Street Station Area Action Plan. (See attached typical section) A comercial driveway curb cut entrance is required. • Relocate the existing catch basins on the frontage of Military Road S. to the new curb line. • A utility pole on the frontage of Military Road S. may need to be relocated. 3. Submit traffic analysis. Traffic mitigation fees may be required. 4. The City of SeaTac objects to the issuance of a variance from the required number of parking spaces. The concern is that overflow parking will occur on the Military Road S. shoulder. If you have any questions please contact me at 206-973-4745. Sincer Mike Bryan, Senior Engineering Technician Attachment: S. 154th Station area plan Military Road S. typical section • • Action Steps South 154th Street Station Area Action Plan PI -3 Improve streetscape along Military Rd S The City, partially in coordination with Sound Transit, should complete planned streetscape improvements along Military Rd. S., which include: • Reconstructed and widened roadway for drainage • Bicycle lanes • Pedestrian facilities Military Road S. Street trees fes,. 12' 5'—� Wide sidewalk Bike Lane Pedestrian scaled lighting 12' s-- 12' i— 5' 12' ---- Travel Lanes Bike Lane Wide sidewalk 30 December, 2006 • Brandon Miles - Taco Time • Page 1 of 1 From: Minnie Dhaliwal To: Brandon Miles Date: 01/27/2011 2:36 PM Subject: Taco Time Brandon, I talked to the following jurisdictions: \L.) 4/.\\' 1.Robert Ruth at City of DesMoines- parking standard 1/125 square feet. No parking required for restaurants Tess than 2000 sq. ft. in the downtown area. No known parking issues at the Taco Time location in their city. He concurred that most of the business at the location is from people using the drive through. 2.Emily at City of Sammamish- parking standard 1/75 sf and stacking space for 7 cars in the drive through. No 3.Heather at City of Redmond- parking standard of 10 per 1000 sf= 1/100 sf. No known parking issues at the known parking issues at the location in their city. location in their city. 4(7( [47 Vic \s'Acp 161 *In file://C:\temp\XPgrpwise\4D419FE4tuk-mail6300-po20020000441175711\GW} 00001.H... 01/27/2011 • Brandon Miles - Fwd: FW: frontage on Military Page 1 of 2 From: Stacy MacGregor To: Brandon Miles Date: 01/27/2011 2:20 PM Subject: Fwd: FW: frontage on Military Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Wed-Thurs-Friday 8:30-3:00 pm 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 A6' Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail »> "Dana Dick" <danad@valvue.com> 05/08/2008 10:51 AM »> Stacy: This should answer your question about the egress to Military Road from our site. See Lena's comment below. Dale Schroeder with SeaTac talked to the city attorney, and I talked to the district attorney, and now the attorney's are talking to each other about the issue of the fee in lieu of frontage assessment. All agree that we can work out a way that Valley View can pay the fee, and the City can hold onto it longer than the state allowed 5 years to use for their future ROW improvement on Military road. Dana Dick Manager Valley View Sewer District 206-242-3236 phone 206-242-1527 fax Original Message From: Lena Kuliczkowska[mailto:Ikuliczkowska@ci.seatac.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:24 AM To: Dana Dick Subject: RE: frontage on Military Dana, The 12' wide egress to Military Rd. is OK by PW Director. Lena Kuliczkowska 206-973-4737 Original Message From: Dana Dick [mailto:danad@valvue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:02 PM To: Lena Kuliczkowska Subject: FW: larger scan file://C:\temp\XPgrpwise\4D417F2Etuk-mail6300-po 100130796C 11D 1 CE1\GW}00001.... 01/27/2011 • • How does this look? Dana Dick Manager Valley View Sewer District 206-242-3236 phone 206-242-1527 fax Original Message From: Copier@valvue.com [mailto:Copier@valvue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:00 PM To: Dana Dick Subject: This E-mail was sent from "RNPAC2FB8" (Aficio 3235C). Scan Date: 05.07.2008 15:59:32 (-0400) Queries to: Copier@valvue.com Page 2 of 2 file://C:\temp\XPgrpwise\4D417F2Etuk-mail6300-po 100130796C 11 D 1 CE 1 \GW } 00001.... 01/27/2011 1 • Brandon Miles - Taco Time and Military Rd S Page 1 of 1 From: Brandon Miles To: ssanderson@ci.seatac.wa.us Date: 01/18/2011 3:16 PM Subject: Taco Time and Military Rd S CC: jdodge@ci.seatac.wa.us Hi Susan - I just left you a voicemail and wanted to follow up via email. Would you have time to meet with myself and the Deputy DCD Director to discuss the future of Military Rd South? Both Seatac and Tukwila have a vested interest in the redevelopment of this area and I think it would make sense for us to have a coordinated plan for redevelopment. Let me know if you are available to meet. Thanks, Brandon Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431-3684 fax (206) 431-3665 bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us file://C:\temp\XPgrpwise\4D3 5AEE6tuk-mail6300-po 100130796C 11 CE561 \GW } 00001.... 01/27/2011 w C',itg afJ Witty" IP Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: X Notice of Public Hearing Project Name: Taco Time Determination of Non -Significance Project Number: PL10-059 Notice of Public Meeting Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailer's signature: Vi Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda X Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 14 day of _January in the year 2011 r2.6 CC 'e_ V° 0^/..LI 1 (1,.u.2 Project Name: Taco Time Project Number: PL10-059 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: Vi Oth,Li W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTIO.DXjC • • AGENCY LABELS • ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( )US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES /) Office of Archaeology 1( Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division ( ) Dept of Ecology, SEPA ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING C TY AGENCIES Health Department ort of Seattle KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning , )KC Dept of Natural Resources /( •) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( BP Olympic Pipeline Val-Vue Sewer District ater District # 20 Water District # 125 City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ) Kent Planning Dept Renton Planning Dept City of SeaTac ity of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist • Public Notice Mailings For Permits* SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION and NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Taco Time is proposing to construct a new restaurant with site improvements at 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. As part of the project the parking lot will be reconfigured and new landscaping will be installed. The existing Tavern located on the site will be demolished. The City is currently processing a public hearing design review application, parking variance request, and a boundary line adjustment application. Projects applied for include: L10-071, Boundary Line Adjustment; L10-077, Public Hearing Design Review; L11-004, Parking Variance Other known required permits include: Demolition Permit Construction Permit Sign Permit Studies required with the applications include: None. This project is exempt from State Environmental Policy Act review per WAC 197-11- 800(17), Information Collection and Research. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Thursday, January 27, 2011. A public hearing is required for the proposed project and will take place Thursday, January 27 , 2010 at 6:30 PM. The Hearing will take place in Council Chambers at City Hall (6200 Southcenter Blvd). To confirm the date and time, please contact Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684, bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: December 21, 2010 Notice of Completeness Issued: December 21, 2010 Notice of Application Issued: January 13, 2011 Nowin VICINITY MAP 501 203.31 N 880109'19" W SITE PLAN OSCALE: 1" = slowww ,1, 0 S' t0 M A0 177141. CODE INFORMATION: SITE NOTES: 12-21-10 SUBMIT DESIGN REVIEW (951280 USE: ZONE: TINE OF CONSTRUCTION: OCC*ANCF r201P: ALLOWABLE AREA: ACTUAL 5100. AREA: ONER.L SITE AREA BLDG 4164455: FLOOR AREA RATIO MAWS 14KRN 0000X4 0025(6031 (05) VO A-2 0701-7/118 RESTAURANT NIM 05.8 111Ru 07000 6,000 Sr (0-2, re CONST) 1.381 F 3/- 26,458 Sr FR011: 20': 200 FRONT: 10: 900E YARD: 10 2.381 5F / 25,458 F w 90 P ARSING REQUIRED: P ARKING MONDE. B LOC r FRAM. 0.945 F USABLE AREA / 100 .38 STALLS 28 STALLS OCCIPANCT FLOOR ARBA TOTAL AREA. 1ST FLOOR 7 2,585 SF TOT. 4001110400 AREA 2,]81 ST C 41 eA00U.NIRS 00005. 110 1415 ® Z2 NT LOO MOST 614 MR 4403 MICE LAPS ® 915200910045004 ® 601( RA0 ® 5 m10811 2611 OZeil 50683 40541413 *9531 2648(10 990500 ® KR CA104 64ID1 ROE! 10 11707t1*LAE ELA4 ® 39 7 29 40101006 MATE 44130 ® COMTE 450[9 531N 601-6 BERMS ® 5913 0501 05001312 MART own CED 0004431 0145915 P540110 Off) UIC173773 CBEA9 01117 • 64022811 R1196N1ED FRLIPR 5001 woo ® 55[A0R sox CUD 40O ewe ® 9 5RIL OLm 5310 PAM MON ® rum (1151 011100: ® PA61m =CRBU1 0415 ® E651. 38166 eat 0 4 0(4011983 ® ORE ow bWRY SQ ® b0 401 099 501 ® 8111 COM 0E7 12495 [NRMAR 6K SAUCCO (x91 10 MAIN 54043. STEEL 8011 011701 ea CD COD 00040 969 Al 1791 048(04 4' SQ PAM 1.7 Elul. 445640119 RERAN 6E4.140 17,7013 513104 K ae9 1150 440 0151. 000711 69e40 a 9845 0591E 1051. C0110811 349514 10 10161 81510 [6S1. 101131717 10 BE RELOCAITO PR0090 TACO lit 959511 4' N1 6160 0101117 4044E DATE R[N90NS Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Tukwila} WA H.G. Kimura G. PLIC 1.1• 01,111.730 1.74w.L4s•Rewe04.7 mow 0ATE:12-21-10 JOB 410.10-2042 A1.1 H.G. KIMURA ARc.IIITPCT.I'IIt January 14, 2011 Attn. Mr. Brandon Miles, Sr. Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Design Review Board — Public Hearing Submittal — Additional Information Taco Time Building 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Miles: Please find attached the following supplemental items per your request: • Revised plans per your comments, 10 copies each full size • 1 set 11 x 17 of revised sheets only • 2 colored photos of building materials • Colored Elevations (1 set) Please call with any questions or if further clarification is necessary. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, HG Kimura Architect, PLLC Howard G. Kimura, AIA Principal ;,;441k4.44,14 1.14/1 Howard G. Kimura, Principal 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 • 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 ■ email: hgkimura@comcast.net • Cita of Saimaa • Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Number: PL10-059 (L10-071, L10-077, L11-004) X Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance 8s Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda X Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _13th day of _January in the year 2011_ Notice of Application and Public hearing Design Review Project Name: Taco Time / Chris Tonkin Project Number: PL10-059 (L10-071, L10-077, L11-004) Mailing requested by: Brand Miles Mailer's signature: 4 / / ag /f }2 _ W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDA%U OF D IBUTION.DOC • City of Tukwila Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing Taco Time Design Review Application 1 7 Location: 15037 Tukwila International Blvd N� S 150th St File #'s L10-077 and L11-044 Applicant: Howard Kimura on behalf of Taco Time Property Owners: Beta Holding LTD Project Planner: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner, (206) 431-3684 or bmilesta7,ci.tukwila.wa.us. Project Description: Taco Time is proposing to construct a new restaurant with site improvements at 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. As part of the project the parking lot will be reconfigured and new landscaping will be installed. The existing Tavern located on the site will be demolished. The City is currently processing a public hearing design review application, parking variance request, and a boundary line adjustment application. Comments and Appeals: The applications are available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:00 PM on January 27, 2010. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3684. A public hearing is required for the proposed project and will take place Thursday. January 27 , 2010 at 6:30 PM. The Hearing will take place in Council Chambers at City Hall (6200 Southcenter Blvd). For more information contact the project planner listed above. • c January 13, 2011 • City Tukwila Jun Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Chris Tonkin 3300 maple Valley Hwy Renton WA 98058 RE: Taco Time Notice of Design Review Application 15037 Tukwila International Blvd., Tukwila Dear Chris Tonkin: There is a fee due on your permit application in the amount of $220.00 to cover mailing the attached public notice. The number of required notices sent for your application was 220 which included property owners and tenants within 500 feet of your project site as well as interested parties and agencies with jurisdiction. The cost is based on the land use fee schedule adopted by Resolution Number 1718 covering Public Notice mailings required for your application. This fee covers the attached notice only. Additional fees may be assessed for future mailings or other review tasks per the fee schedule. This amount needs to be paid before the city can continue processing your permit application. The payment may be paid by cash, check or credit card. The city will accept credit card payments by phone. If paying by check please send the check made out to: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 If payment is not received within 15 days of this notice your permit application may be put on hold. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 206.431.3670. • itirely, Tvedahl Administrative Support Technician MD Invoicing Public Mailings.doc Page 1 of 1 01/12/2011 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 OWNER_NAME LAMB,MICHAEL B & SHERYL TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER RESIDENT OCTON HOLDING INC OCCUPANT DOND & KUO INC OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT ULANOWSKI,ALAN E OCCUPANT OWNER_ADDRESS 10908 RAINIER AVE S 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 101 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 102 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 103 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 104 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 105 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 106 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 107 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 108 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 109 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 110 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 111 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 112 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 113 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 114 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 115 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 116 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 117 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 118 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 119 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 120 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 121 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 122 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 201 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 202 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 203 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 204 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 205 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 206 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 207 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 208 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 209 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 210 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 211 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 212 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 213 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 214 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 215 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 216 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 217 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 218 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 219 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 220 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 221 14828 MILITARY RD S Apt 222 14839 MILITARY RD S 14845 TUKWILA INTNL BLVD 14855 MILITARY RD S 14855 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 14857 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 14864 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 15001 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 15005 MILITARY RD S 15006 MILITARY RD S 15010 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 15015 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 15022 MILITARY RD S 15025 MILITARY RD S 15029 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 15030 MILITARY RD S 15035 32ND PL S 15035 MILITARY RD S 15036 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 15037 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 15039 MILITARY RD S 15043 32ND PL S 15045 32ND PL S OWNER_CITY OWNER_; OWNER_ ZIP SEATTLE WA 98178 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 SEATAC WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 SEATAC WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATTLE WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 OCCUPANT RESIDENT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT TERSIGNI,ANDREA 15201 MILITARY ROAD SOUTH LLC OCCUPANT OCCUPANT MONEY TREE H & R BLOCK QUIZNOS CASINO DOFREDO,NESTOR VILLANUEVA KANG,HEE YEOL POMPEO,JOSEPH M DISCLAIM TRUST COMISKEY,ROBERT VESPER,MERRILL K JAMAX ASSOCIATES LLC MP TRIANGLE LLC NEW HORIZONS GRP LLC II MAYER,R L BANWAIT,SUKHCHAIN HEADLEE,MICHAEL & DELORIS TRUST KERN,GERARD J & CAROL A SIKOV & SEABREEZE LLC DUMOVIC,JOSEPH L & KATHERINE ARIF,SAYED M OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT LOPEZ,JOSE MARTIN OCCUPANT OCCUPANT BLUE,GLENN C OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 15047 MILITARY RD S SEATAC 15049 32ND PL S SEATAC 15051 MILITARY RDS SEATAC 15059 32ND PL S SEATAC 15060 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA 15061 MILITARY RD S SEATTLE 1510 SW 158TH ST SEATTLE 15201 MILITARY RD S SEATAC 15210 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SEATAC 15211 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SEATAC 15247 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SEATAC 15247 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SEATAC 15247 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SEATAC 15247 INTERNATIONAL BLVD SEATAC 1531 15TH AVE S SEATTLE 1550 ALKI AVE SW 500 SEATTLE 16851 4TH AVE S 18161 NORMANDY TER SW 18619 SE 346TH ST 18709 SE 44TH PL 2003 WESTERN AVE 500 21312 212TH AVE SE 2133 SW 173RD PL 21639 104TH PL SE 23808 90TH PL W 2402 80TH AVE NE 2625 NW ESPLANADE 27060 SE 196TH ST 28019 129TH PL SE 3217 S 150TH ST 3225 S 152ND ST 3231 S 150TH ST 3233 S 150TH ST 3235 S 152ND ST 3238 S 150TH ST 3240 S 152ND ST 3248 S 152ND ST 3253 S 152ND ST 3261 S 152ND ST 3400 S 150TH ST 3415 S 150TH ST 3434 S 152ND ST 3459 S 152ND ST 3469 S 152ND ST 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 101 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 102 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 103 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 104 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 105 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 106 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 107 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 108 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 109 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 110 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 111 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 112 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 113 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 114 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 201 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 202 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 203 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 204 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 205 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 206 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 207 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 208 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 209 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 210 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98166 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98188 WA 98144 WA 98116 BURIEN WA 98148 NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 AUBURN WA 98092 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 SEATTLE WA 98121 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 SEATTLE WA 98166 KENT WA 98031 EDMONDS WA 98026 MEDINA WA 98039 SEATTLE WA 98117 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 KENT WA 98030 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 SEATTLE WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 211 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 212 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 213 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 214 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 301 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 302 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 303 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 304 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 305 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 306 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 307 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 308 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 309 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 310 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 311 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 312 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 313 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3469 S 152ND ST Apt 314 TUKWILA WA 98188 OCCUPANT 3480 S 152ND ST TUKWILA WA 98188 OCCUPANT 3481 S 152ND ST TUKWILA WA 98188 MAYER,KARL R & DEBRA 3515 SW 170TH ST SEATTLE WA 98166 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3701 S 150TH ST Apt 1 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3701 S 150TH ST Apt 2 TUKWILA WA 98168 OCCUPANT 3703 S 150TH ST TUKWILA WA 98188 VESPER,HELEN LOUISE TRUST 3703 S 152ND ST TUKWILA WA 98188 OCCUPANT 3707 S 150TH ST TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3707 S 150TH ST Apt A TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3707 S 150TH ST Apt B TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3707 S 150TH ST Apt C TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3707 S 150TH ST Apt D TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 1 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 10 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 11 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 12 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 14 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 15 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 16 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 17 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 18 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 19 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 2 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 20 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 21 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 22 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 23 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 23B TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 24 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 25 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 26 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 27 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 28 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 29 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 3 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 30 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 31 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 32 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 33 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 34 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 35 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 36 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 37 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 38 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 39 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 4 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 40 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 5 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 7 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 8 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER OCCUPANT TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER CITY OF SEATAC MCNAMARA,FLORINE DESMOIRE,FRANK SR FAMILY TRUST WALKER,BRETT HENKLE FAMILY TRUST JEWETT,MATTHEW DUONG,HOA THI WENDCO NW LTD PRTNRSHP VIP 3614 LLC KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON WILSON,TIMOTHY D HAWLEY ENTERPRISES INC CHRIS TONKIN 3714 S 152ND ST Apt 9 3716 S 152ND ST 3717 S 150TH ST Apt A 3717 S 150TH ST Apt B 3717 S 150TH ST Apt C 3717 S 150TH ST Apt D 4800 S 188TH ST 5245 BELL CT 5245 BELL CT 5248 CALIFORNIA AVE SW 74 HOH PL 7563 CALIFORNIA AVE SW PO BOX 1463 PO BOX 256 PO BOX 28 PO BOX 560807 PO BOX 95647 PO BOX 1002 3300 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 SEATAC WA 98188 CHINO CA 91710 CHINO CA 91710 SEATTLE WA 98136 LA CONNER WA 98257 SEATTLE WA 98136 RENTON WA 98057 DUBLIN OH 43017 KIRKLAND WA 98083 DALLAS TX 75356 SEATTLE WA 98145 ENUMCLAW WA 98022 RENTON WA 98058 • • Alan Metzler - Re: Project Status From: Alan Metzler To: Brandon Miles Date: 01/11/2011 11:39 AM Subject: Re: Project Status CC: Alan Metzler; Donald Tomaso Page 1 of 2 Brandon - I grabbed the Taco Time land use permit (L10-077) and reviewed it per your request. Here are my comments. - Fire access looks good. - Fire hydrant location must be verified to be within 150', no farther than 300' from building via vehicular travel. - Adequate fire flow must be verified for type of proposed building construction type. - A fully automatic UL Central Station monitored fire alarm system will be required for this building. No further comments at this time. Al Metzler, CFPE,CBPE,CBI, CFI Fire Project Coordinator Tukwila Fire Department 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 575-4407 Phone (206) 575-4439 Fax ametzler@ci.tukwila.wa.us Al Metzler, CFPE,CBPE,CBI, CFI Fire Project Coordinator Tukwila Fire Department 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 575-4407 Phone (206) 575-4439 Fax ametzler a@ci. tukwila. wa. us »> Brandon Miles 01/11/2011 9:20 AM »> Alan - I am under the gun. Are you reviewing these projects? We are overdue. file://C:\Documents and Settings\metzler-a.TUKWILA\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\... 01/11/2011 • Brandon Miles - Taco Time • Page l of l From: Brandon Miles To: jdodge@ci.seatac.wa.us Date: 01/05/2011 8:01 PM Subject: Taco Time Hi Jack - I just want to follow up on the Taco Time plans that I dropped off two weeks ago. I will be in all day Thursday if you have time to discuss. Thanks, Brandon Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431-3684 fax (206) 431-3665 bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us file://C:\temp\XPgrpwise\4D24CE36tuk-mail6300-po100130796C 11 C9731\GW}00001.... 01/27/2011 • ity f T 1io40 • Department of Cn ,v nity Development NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION December 23, 2010 Mr. Howard G. Kimura, AIA 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE Renton, WA 98058 Subject: Taco Time Design Review Application (L10-077) 15037 TIB Dear Mr. Kimura: Jim Haggerton, Mayor Jack Pace, Director Your application for a 4 -lot Boundary Line Adjustment is considered complete on December 23, 2010 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 431-3659. Brafdon J. Iles Senior Planner cc. L10-077 JR Page 1 of l W:\Planning\Planning Forms\Backup of COMPLETE.wbk 06/27/2008 4:14 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 1 • ii i of ittk Jim Haggerton, Mayor 11ep rtr December 23, 2010 ent (f Cornmegralty Development pmentt Jack Pace, Director Mr. Jack Dodge City of Seatac Department of Community Development 4800 South 188th Street SeaTac, WA 98188-8605 RE: Taco Time Design Review Application (L10-077) 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Dear Mr. Dodge: The City of Tukwila has received a design review application to construct a new Taco Time restaurant at 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. For review by the City of Seatac, I have included copies of the level 1 Drainage Analysis for both Tukwila and Seatac, a copy of the Preliminary Technical Information Report and the draft development plans for the project. The plans provided by the applicant propose two access points from Military Road which is within Seatac's jurisdiction. We are attempting to take the application to the City's design review board on January 27, 2011. It would assist us in our review process if Seatac could provide us any comments by January 7, 2011. It may also be helpful to meet with your planning staff and representatives from your Public Works Department to discuss the project. I am generally open the next couple of weeks if Seatac staff has time to meet. To provide you some additional background, the existing tavern on the site will be demolished and the project is exempt from SEPA review. If you have any questions, I can bee reached by phone at (206) 431-3684 or by email at bmiles(a�ci.mkwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Brandon . Miles Senior Planner cc. File (L10-077) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 TO: 1 • Development Review Supplemental Memorandum Public Works Development Review Staff Fire Development Review Staff Building Development Review Chris Partman, Police FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner DATE: December 23, 2010 RE: Taco Time Design Review Application PL10-059, L10-077 Project Description Taco Time has submitted a design review application to construct a new restaurant at 15037 TIB. As part of the project, the existing tavern will be demolished. Please review the attached plans and provide comments or concerns that impact the design review application. These comments would include any comments that would impact the site design or building design. Notes to Development Review Team o Please provide any comments by January 6, 2011 regarding the proposed project. This maybe your only opportunity to review or provide comments on this project. Please list any additional permits or requirements that you Department may impose on the project. Any condition should be supported by applicable code citations. o Remember to track you time to permits plus. Thanks. 1 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number -7 PLI )3 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building 0 Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. 0I Parks/Rec Project: Comments Update date: prepared by: Address: 0 513 1 1 (3 Date transmitted: 1)-- J 21- i Response requested by: % 1 i 1 B Staff(�Date coordinator: y . Mlles- response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 4Pe Viet k) Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number 745--/ LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building n Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. n Parks/Rec Project: !" 7 t A Update date: Address: ,., Date,� transmitted: 12- 3- 1 ,, Response requested by: 6 i r L1 (1 Staff5_,Milei- coordinator: '' ,- Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. ef. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date:,Comments —/F / / �1 prepared by: U! Update date: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development • File Number L-1 D— ")-7 ()Li USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: / ,r. I (`D k‘Vit., Comments prepared by: f) / , Update date: Address: I '-.)11 1 1I Ci DateResponse transmitted: 12--,�- r ,, requested by: (11 a Staff�r coordinator: j 5 : 9-�' el Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) zve rtp A l Ja,i-7(J (/ S i�bY% (AV?�d/, Plan check date:.., ,,i, , d /2.. --Ph -te Comments prepared by: f) / , Update date: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RECEIVA UW 23 2010 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number L-1)— -?-7 PLL LAND USE ' T ROUTING FORM TO: Building D� Planning Public Work / Fire Dept. Police Dept. 0 Parks/Rec Project: ./ ,` . 6`-7 tie1C. Update date: prepared by: Address: 1 S.)3 1 1'i Ci Date transmitted: +� ,� 1 - I requested by: ( �1 % ' i Staff coordinator: '' g , : 9 �'�y 1 Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) ipiteik3 Cs Arty Com w..elect S ) 00N Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: • • CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DIVISION — Brandon Miles, Senior Planner FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer (206) 431-2448 dmcpherson@ci.tukwila.wa.us DATE: January 11, 2011 SUBJECT: Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Design Review, and Miscellaneous Comments DESIGN REVIEW — L10-077 1. Per the Public Works, Senior Surface Water Engineer — The Conservation Flow Control Standard will be allowed to be modified through the 2009 KCSWDM adjustment process. See exception # 5, page 1-42 of the manual. (Enclosed for reference.) The following was provided by the Public Works, Senior Transportation Engineer: 1. No Traffic Concurrency Test fee is required for this proposed project. 2. Transportation Impact fee for this proposed project is $2,865.24. (See below) Trudy's Tavern - Trip Generation - 3,096 sf* 11.34/1000 = 35 trips / no allowances for pass -by trips Taco Time Restaurant -Trip Generation - 2,381 0°33.84/1000 = 81 driveway trips / 81 *50% pass -by = 40 net new trips Delta trip generation - 40-35 = 5 trips / Trip length adjustment to impact fee due 5*0.54*$1,061.20 = $2,865.24 Miscellaneous Comments City of SeaTac shall approve any street improvements along Military Rd. South. All utilities are required to be underground, per City ordinance. Page 1 of 1 • • SECTION 1.2 CORE REQUIREMENTS discharge location from the project site (note: for the purposes of this calculation. target surfaces served by jlow control BVIPs per Appendix C may be modeled in accordance with the flow control BMMIPfacility sizing credits in Table I.2.3.C, p. 1-47), AND b) The increased runoff from target surfaces will not significantly impact a critical area, severe flooding problem, or severe erosion problem. B. CONSERVATION FLOW CONTROL AREAS Conservation Flow Control Areas cover all of unincorporated King County except where the County has determined that control of flow durations and peaks to historic site conditions is not necessary to protect or allow for the restoration of water quality or habitat functions essential to salmonids. Conservation Flow Control Areas are the default designation until a County -approved plan or study has determined that natural and manmade conveyance systems within the area designated are not sensitive to development - induced increases in runoff volume and durations. Most Conservation Flow Control Areas are delineated on the Flow Control Applications Map adopted with this manual (see map pocket on inside of back cover). Any unincorporated areas of King County not shown on this map shall be assumed to be Conservation Flow Control Areas unless they drain entirely by non -erodible manmade conveyance to a major receiving water (listed on page 1-37), in which case they will be assumed to be Basic Flow Control Areas. A more detailed delineation of Conservation Flow Control Areas is available on the County's Geographic Information System. Note: For projects located at or near the delineated boundary of the Conservation Flow Control Area, site- specific topography or drainage information may be needed to verb that a project or any threshold discharge area of a project is within the flow control area. Any threshold discharge area is considered to be within the Conservation Flow Control Area if the threshold discharge area drains to a waterbody or drainage system that is clearly within the mapped Conservation Flow Control Area. However, any threshold discharge area that drains entirely by non -erodible manmade conveyance to a major receiving water (listed on page 1-37) may be assumed to be located within and subject to the facility requirements and exceptions of a Basic Flow Control Area. Within Conservation Flow Control Areas, required flow control facilities must comply with the following minimum requirements for facility performance and mitigation of targeted surfaces, except where such requirements or the facility requirement itself is waived or reduced by the area -specific exceptions at the end of this subsection. R E Q M T Minimum Required Performance Facilities in Conservation Flow Control Areas must comply with the following flow control performance standard and assumptions unless modified by offsite analysis per Core Requirement #2 (see Table 1.2.3.A, p. 1-36): Level 2 Flow Control: Match developed discharge durations to predeveloped durations for the range of predeveloped discharge rates from 50% of the 2 -year peak flow up to the full 50 -year peak flow. Also match developed peak discharge rates to predeveloped peak discharge rates for the 2- and 10 - year return periods. Assume historic site conditions as the predeveloped condition. Intent The Level 2 flow control standard assuming historic site conditions is intended to limit the amount of time that erosive flows are at work generating erosion and sedimentation within natural and constructed drainage systems. Such control is effective in preventing development -induced increases in natural erosion rates and reducing existing erosion rates where they may have been increased by past development of the site. This is accomplished by maintaining at historic predevelopment levels the aggregate time that developed flows exceed an erosion -causing threshold (i.e., 50% of the historic 2 -year peak flow). Maintaining natural erosion rates within streams and their tributary areas is 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1-40 • • 1.2.3 CORE REQUIREMENT 43: FLOW CONTRCL important for preventing increases in stream channel erosion and sediment loading that are detrimental to salmonid habitat and production. Effectiveness in Addressing Downstream Drainage Problems While the Level 2 flow control standard assuming historic site conditions provides a reasonable level of protection for preventing most development -induced problems, it does not necessarily prevent increases in existing site conditions 100 -year peak flows that can aggravate severe flooding problems as described in Core Requirement #2, nor does it necessarily prevent aggravation of all severe erosion problems. Consequently, if one or more of these problems are identified through offsite analysis per Core Requirement #2, additional onsite flow control and/or offsite improvements will likely be required (see "Drainage Problem -Specific Mitigation Requirements" in Section 1.2.2.2, p. 1-30). Target Surfaces Facilities in Conservation Flow Control Areas27 must mitigate (either directly or in effect) the runoff from the following target developed surfaces within the threshold discharge area for which the facility is required: 1. New impervious surface that is not fully dispersed per the criteria on Page 1-46. For individual lots within residential subdivision projects, the extent of new impervious surface shall be assumed as specified in Chapter 3. Note, any new impervious surface such as a bridge that spans the ordinary high water of a stream, pond, or lake may be excluded as a target surface if the runoff from such span is conveyed to the ordinary high water area in accordance with Criteria (b), (c), (d), and (e) of the "Direct Discharge Exemption" (p 1-37). 2. New pervious surface that is not fully dispersed. For individual lots within residential subdivision projects, the extent of new pervious surface shall be assumed to be the entire lot area, except the assumed impervious portion and any portion in which native conditions are preserved by covenant, tract, or easement. In addition, the new pervious surface on individual lots shall be assumed to be 100% grass if located within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) and 50% grass/50% pasture if located outside the UGA. 3. Existing impervious surface added since January 8, 2001 that is not fully dispersed and not yet mitigated with a County -approved flow control facility or flow control BMP. Note: January 8, 2001 is the effective date of the ESA 4(d) Rule for Puget Sound Chinook salmon. 4. Replaced impervious surface that is notfully dispersed on a transportation redevelopment project in which new impervious surface is 5,000 square feet or more and totals 50% or more of the existing impervious surface within the project limits. 5. Replaced impervious surface that is notfully dispersed on a parcel redevelopment project in which the total of new plus replaced impervious surface is 5,000 square feet or more and whose valuation of proposed improvements (including interior improvements and excluding required mitigation improvements) exceeds 50% of the assessed value of the existing site improvements. Exceptions The following exceptions apply only in Conservation Flow Control Areas27: 1. The historic site conditions assumption for application of Level 2 flow control may be reduced through a basin plan or study approved by King County DNRP and the Washington State Department of Ecology. One possible reduction is to an assumption of 75% forest, 15% grass, and 10% impervious surface (75/15/10 conditions) or existing site conditions, whichever generates the lowest 100 -year peak flow. Another possible change that could be made through a County and Ecology approved basin 27 Note: Any threshold discharge area that appears to be located within a Conservation Flow Control Area according to the Flow Control Applications Map but drains entirely by non -erodible manmade conveyance to a major receiving water (listed on page 1-37) is considered to be located within a Basic Flow Control Area. 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1/9/2009 1-41 • • SECTION 1.2 CORE REQUIREMENTS plan or study is to the lowest peak flow (50% of the 2 -year peak flow) above which discharge durations must be matched. This peak flow, known as the geomorphic threshold of bed load movement, may be changed based on the actual channel conditions necessary to protect or allow for restoration of water body beneficial uses and habitat functions essential to salmonids. 2. The facility requirement in Conservation Flow Control Areas is waived for any threshold discharge area in which there is no more than a 0.1-cfs difference in the sum of developed 100 -year peak flows for those target surfaces subject to this requirement and the sum of historic site conditions 100 - year peak flows for the same surface areas. Note: for the purposes of this calculation, target surfaces served by flow control BLIPS per Appendix C may be modeled in accordance with the flow control BMP facility sizing credits in Table 1.2.3.0 (p. 1-47). 3. The facility requirement in Conservation Flow Control Areas may be reduced or waived for any threshold discharge area where a plan or study approved by the County and Ecology shows that a lower standard (e.g., Level 1 flow control) is sufficient or no facility is necessary to protect or allow for restoration of water body beneficial uses and habitat functions essential to salmonids. 4. The facility requirement in Conservation Flow Control Areas as applied to replaced impervious surface may be waived if the County has adopted a plan and implementation schedule approved by state Department of Ecology for fulfilling this requirement in regional facilities. The facility requirement in Conservation Flow Control Areas as applied to replaced impervious surface may be reduced by the DDES Land Use Services Division Manager/designee or Building Services Division Manager/designee using the procedures detailed in Sections 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 of the adjustment process, if the cost of flow control facilities to mitigate all target surfaces exceeds that necessary to mitigate only for new impervious surface plus new pervious surface and also exceeds 1/3 of the valuation of proposed improvements (including interior improvements) or twice the cost of a facility to mitigate equivalent surfaces on a new development site, whichever is less. The amount of reduction shall be limited such that the cost of flow control facilities is at least equal to that necessary to mitigate only for new impervious surface plus new pervious surface, and beyond this amount, is no greater than 1/3 of the valuation of proposed improvements (including interior improvements) or twice the cost of a facility to mitigate equivalent surfaces on a new development site, whichever is less. C. FLOOD PROBLEM FLOW CONTROL AREAS R E n M T Flood Problem Flow Control Areas are designated by King County where the County has determined that a higher average level of flow control is needed to prevent aggravation of existing documented flooding problems. Such areas are delineated on the Flow Control Applications Map (located inside the back cover of this manual), and are also listed on the map by name of lake, wetland code number (from the King Cot. rnty Wetlands Inventory), or approximate address. A more detailed delineation of Flood Problem Flow Control Areas is available on the County's Geographic Information System. Note: For projects located at or near the delineated boundary of the Flood Problem Flow Control Area, site-specific topography or drainage information may be needed to verify that a project or any threshold discharge area of a project is within the flow control area. Any threshold discharge area is considered to be within the Flood Problem Flow Control Area if the threshold discharge area drains to a waterbody or drainage system that is clearly within the mapped Flood Problem Flow Control Area. Within Flood Problem Flow Control Areas, required flow control facilities must comply with the following minimum requirements for facility performance and mitigation of targeted surfaces, except where such requirements or the facility requirement itself is waived or reduced by the area -specific exceptions at the end of this subsection. 1/9/2009 2009 Surface Water Design Manual 1-42 • • Brandon Miles - comments on Taco Time landscaping plan Page 1 of 1 From: Sandra Whiting To: Brandon Miles Date: 12/30/2010 2:24 PM Subject: comments on Taco Time landscaping plan Brandon, Here are my comments on the plan dated 12/21/10: 1. Regarding the plaza area: Substitute lower growing and more columnar shrubs to increase the "transparency" of the view into this area. Suggestions: substitute a dwarf Berberis or Lonicera pileata for the Berberis verruculosa and substitute a columnar evergreen in place of the Prunus laurocerasus. 2. Symbols are missing in the plant list legend for the Acer Palmatum, Acer rubrum, Pyrus calleryana, Hebe, and Nasella tenuissima. 3. Note 4, the soil mix should also specify that organic content must be at least 10%. The supplier will be expected to submit test results to demonstrate this. 4. Typical planting detail - make the following adjustments and additions: a. No special soil mix should be used as backfill for planting pits. Instead the entire planting area should be amended as per Note 4 and the plant pits backfilled with that. b. Planting pits should be no deeper than the depth of the root ball and the top of the root ball shall be even with the soil surface. c. Root balls from containerized plants are to be loosened and straightened before planting. d. All wire and twine shall be removed from B&B plants, or at least from the top 2/3 of the rootball. e. Mulch is to be kept 2-3 inches away from the trunks and crowns of plants. 5. Provide specifications for plant quality, root conditions, etc. 6. Provide specifications for mulch. Sandra file://C:\temp\XPgrpwise\4D 1 C9624tuk-mail6300-po 100130796C 11 C81 B 1\GW } 00001.... 01/06/2011 • City of Tukwila • Jim Haggerton, Mayor Police Department David W. Haynes, Chief of Police An Accredited Agency MEMORANDUM To: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner N From: Chris Partman, Community Policing Coordinator - Date: December 29, 2010 Subject: Taco Time Design Review Application, PL 10-059, L10-077 After reviewing the plans for the new Taco Time at 15037 Tukwila International Blvd I have the following recommendations. 1. All fencing should be "transparent". The described 6ft chain link fence with dark slats along the north edge of the property will prevent a view of the Taco Time property from the north. This will encourage criminal activities on the property, especially when the business is closed. The recommended fencing is a 3-4ft high wrought iron fence. This should be constructed in a way to discourage people from using it as seating. 2. Fencing is also recommended for the south property line to prevent pedestrians from walking across the drive through lane. The recommended fencing is a 3-4ft high wrought iron fence. This should be constructed in a way to discourage people from using it as seating. 3. For the outside seating area on the east side of the building, low decorative fencing is recommended. This provides a visual cue of ownership and will assist in deterring non - customers from using this space. The recommended fencing is a 3-4ft high wrought iron fence. This should be constructed in a way to discourage people from using it as seating. 4. The landscaping at the northeast corner of the property should be kept very low with the goal of leaving the space open to people both in the Taco Time parking lot and on TIB. 5. Unless the business will be staffed 24 hours a day, I recommend that Taco Time participate in the Tukwila Police Department Criminal Trespass Program. This allows officers to be pro -active and order non -customers to leave the property when the business is closed. An informational flyer about this program and a "Letter of Authorization" is attached. Sections: 13.200.010 13.200.020 13.200.030 Chapter 13.200 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Off-site improvements. Construction specifications. Deferral of construction of improvements. • 13.200.010 Off-site improvements. Whenever a building permit with a project value in excess of $75,000 or grading and drainage permit with a project value in excess of $75,000 is applied for under provisions of City ordinances to: A. Construct a new building or expand an existing building to be used for: 1. Multiple -residence structure consisting of three (3) or more dwelling units; or 2. Public assembly; or 3. Commercial purposes; or 4. Industrial purposes; or B. Construct or expand a parking lot; or C. Expand or modify a building in connection with a change of use. In this instance a change of use would be a change in land use as described by the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual for the purposes of calculating Transportation Mitigation Fees per Chapter 11.15 SMC; D. Create a subdivision of property per SMC Title 14; then the applicant for such building or grading and drainage permit shall simultaneously make application for a permit, as an integral part of such new construction or alteration, for the construction of such off-site improvements as may be required by the Public Works Director, or designee, including, but not limited to, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street paving, traffic signalization, water mains, drainage facilities, sanitary sewers, all improvements required by any applicable ordinance and all necessary appurtenances. Such off-site improvements (except traffic signalization systems) shall extend the full distance of the real property to be improved upon and which adjoins property dedicated as a public street. Traffic signalization off-site improvements shall be installed pursuant to the provisions of all applicable ordinances. (Ord. 04-1008 § 3) 13.200.020 Construction specifications. • • All sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street paving and other improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the standard specifications adopted by the City and all applicable City ordinances. All plans and specifications for such improvements shall be submitted at the time of making application for the building permit. (Ord. 04-1008 § 3) 13.200.030 Deferral of construction of improvements. The construction of required off-site improvements may be deferred pursuant to the procedure set forth in Chapter 14.10 SMC. (Ord. 04-1008 § 3) • 1 Chapter 11.15 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES1 Sections: 11.15.010 Transportation impact fees established. 11.15.020 Definitions. 11.15.030 Establishment of service area. 11.15.040 Imposition of impact fee on development activity. 11.15.050 Disposition of impact fee revenues. 11.15.060 Refunds. 11.15.070 Appeals. 11.15.080 Severability. 11.15.090 Termination date of authority to collect and expend impact fees. 11.15.010 Transportation impact fees established. There is established, subject to the provisions of this chapter, a transportation impact fee program. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.020 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this section shall, for all purposes of this chapter, have the meanings specified in this section, with words importing the singular number including the plural number and visa versa: "Act" means the sections of the Washington State Growth Management Act, codified as RCW 82.02.050 through 82.02.090, as now in existence, or as hereinafter amended. "Building permit" means any written authorization from the City which authorizes the commencement of development activity. "Capital facility plan" means the capital facilities plan element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, as now in existence or as hereinafter amended. "City" means the City of SeaTac, Washington. "City Comprehensive Plan" means the City's comprehensive land use plan, adopted pursuant to Act. "Development activity" means any construction or expansion of a building or structure that creates additional demand on and/or the need for public facilities, but not interior remodeling that does not change the PM Peak trips as categorized in the interim transportation plan element to the City's Comprehensive Plan or of the applicable code or regulation of the City. • • "Fair market value" means the price in terms of money that a property will bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions of a fair sale, the buyer and seller each prudently knowledgeable, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. "Hearing Examiner" means the Hearing Examiner of the City of SeaTac, pursuant to Chapter 1.20 of the City Code. "Impact fee" means a payment of money imposed by the City upon development activity as a condition of issuance of a building permit to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and to mitigate the impacts of the development activity on the transportation facilities of the City, but does not include any permit or application fee. "Impact fee fund" means the service area development impact fee fund of the City created pursuant to Section 3.75.010 of the City Code. "Owner" means the owner of record of real property, although real property is being purchased under a real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of real property if the contract is recorded. "Public facilities" as used in this section refers to public streets, roads and rights-of-way owned or operated by the City for other governmental entities, including trails, paths, bikeways, other transportation facilities and all attendant improvements. "Service area" means the development impact fee service area of the City identified in SMC 11.15.030. "System improvements" means public facilities that are included in the capital facilities plan. "Transportation facilities" means and refers to streets and roads, but includes all publicly owned streets, roads, alleys and right-of-ways within the City and street services, traffic control devices, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and related facilities and improvements. "Transportation plan" means the transportation plan element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.030 Establishment of service area. The City hereby establishes as the service area for development impact fees the City of SeaTac, including all property located within the corporate limits of the City. The scope of the service area is hereby found to be reasonable and established on the basis of sound planning and engineering principles. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.040 Imposition of impact fee on development activity. A. The City hereby authorizes the assessment and collection of impact fees on development activity within the City, at the rate of one thousand twenty dollars ($1,020) per peak p.m. trip, as • • computed in accordance with the most current edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, as applied to the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the transportation element. It is hereby declared that such impact fees shall: 1. Only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to new development; and 2. Not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of the system improvements, including the costs of previously constructed system improvements, reasonably related to new development; and 3. Be used for system improvements that will reasonably benefit new development; and 4. Not be imposed to make up for deficiencies in any previously constructed system improvements. Such impact fee schedule is based upon the formula for calculating the proportionate share of the cost of the system improvements, including the costs of previously constructed system improvements, necessitated by new development to be borne by impact fees, which formulas are described in the interim transportation plan element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and incorporated herein by this reference. B. The impact fees imposed pursuant to this chapter shall be assessed by the City at the time of the application for the building permit, and shall be due and payable, in whole at the time of issuance of such permit without interest. C. Failure to pay the impact fees for a given development activity at the time of assessment shall result in denial of the building permit for which the owner has applied. D. In computing the fee applicable to a given development activity, credit shall be given for the fair market value, measured at the time of dedication of land or upon completion of dedicated improvements or construction, of any dedicated land for, improvements to, or construction of, any system improvements in the same category of public facilities as that of the applicable fee provided by the owner and required by the City as a condition of approving the development activity over and above the minimum development standards set out in the City's subdivision and street ordinances. E. The City Manager or designee may adjust the amount of the impact fee otherwise imposed hereby with respect to specific projects requiring a building permit upon determining that: 1. Unusual circumstances requires such adjustment to ensure that such impact fees are imposed fairly; and • • 2. Studies and data submitted by the owner regarding the impacts of such owner's proposed development activity requires such adjustment to ensure that such impact fees are imposed fairly. Impact fees shall not be deemed unfair unless such unusual circumstances and studies and data support a finding that the impact fees otherwise imposed hereby allocate to the specific project in question a share of the cost of the systems improvements reasonably related to new development that is greater than or substantially less than such project's allocable proportionate share of such costs. (Ord. 02- 1041 § 2; Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.050 Disposition of impact fee revenues. A. The impact fees collected pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be deposited into the impact fee fund created pursuant to SMC 3.75.010. Pending application as provided in this chapter, the monies deposited in the accounts of the impact fee fund shall be invested in any investment authorized for the investment of City funds. All interest and profits derived from the investment of monies in each account in the impact fee fund shall be retained in such account. B. The impact fees deposited in each account in the impact fee fund, and the interest and profit received from the investments therefrom shall be expended only for public facilities of the type for which such impact fees were collected, in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and capital facilities plan element, and expended or encumbered within six years of receipt by the City, unless written findings by the City Council identify an extra -ordinary and compelling reason for the City to hold the fees for a longer time. The City shall account for annual expenditures and shall comply with this section in successive comprehensive plans, transportation plans and capital facilities plans as appropriate. C. The City shall prepare an annual report on the impact fee fund which shows the source and amount of all monies collected, earned or received and the public facilities that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.060 Refunds. A. The City shall refund to the current owners of property on which an impact fee has been paid any impact fees paid with respect to such property that has not been expended or incumbered for public facilities of the type of which such impact fees were collected within six years from the date of receipt or such longer period of time as is established in the event that the City Council finds that an extra ordinary or compelling reason exists to hold the fees longer than six years as provided in SMC 11.15.050. Impact fees shall be considered incumbered on a first in first out basis. The City shall notify potential refund claimants by first-class mail deposited with the United States Postal Service at the last known address of the claimants. B. The City shall also refund to the current owner of property of which an impact fee has been paid all impact fees paid with respect to such property if the development activity for which the impact fee was imposed did not occur and no impact has resulted; provided, that if some, but not 1 • • all, of the development activity for which the impact fee was imposed occurred, the impact will be deemed to have occurred, and no refund shall be available under this section. C. Owners seeking a refund of impact fees must submit a written request for a refund of impact fees to the City Manager or designee within one (1) year of the date the right to claim the refund arises, which, for purposes of refund claims authorized pursuant to subsection B of this section only, shall be the date of voluntary or involuntary abandonment of the building permit, or the date that notice is given as provided in subsection A of this section, which ever occurs later. Refunds of impact fees shall include interest and any profits earned on the impact fees from the date of their receipt to the date of refund, as a percentage of the interest/profits earned by the fund on an annual basis. Any impact fees not expended within the time limitations described in SMC 11.15.050(B), and for which no application fora refund has been made within the one (1) year claim period, shall be retained by the City and expended on public facilities of the type for which such impact fees were initially collected, without further limitation as to the time of expenditure. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.070 Appeals. A. An owner may pay an impact fee imposed pursuant to this chapter under protest in order to obtain a building permit, and after such payment, may file an appeal regarding the amount of such impact fee in accordance with this section. B. The determination of the City Manager or designee regarding the applicability of the impact fee to a given development activity within the service area shall be final. The Hearing Examiner shall have the power to hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in the City Manager's or designee's determination of the impact fee imposed upon a development activity pursuant to this chapter. C. Appeal to the Hearing Examiner regarding the amount of the impact fee imposed on any development activity may only be taken by the owner of the property where such development activity shall occur. No appeal shall be permitted unless and until the impact fee at issue has been paid. Such appeals shall be taken within a reasonable time, not exceeding ten (10) days after the date the impact fee was paid, by filing with the City Manager or designee and with the Hearing Examiner a notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof and depositing an appeal filing fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00). The City Manager or designee shall forthwith transfer to the Hearing Examiner all papers constituting the record upon which the amount of the impact fee was determined. D. The Hearing Examiner shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal, give public notice thereof as well as due notice to the parties of interest, and decide the same within a reasonable time of the hearing. Any party may appear in person or by agent or through his/her attorney. • • E. In exercising the above-mentioned powers, the Hearing Examiner may, so long as such action is in conformity with the terms of this chapter, reverse or affirm, wholly or partially or may modify the determination of the amount of the impact fee appealed from only upon a determination that it is proper to do so based on principal of fairness, and may make such order, requirements, decisions or determination as ought to be made, and to that end shall have the powers with respect to the determination of the impact fees as they are granted to the City pursuant to this chapter. F. Any person or persons, or any board, taxpayer or department or division of the City aggrieved by any decision of the Hearing Examiner may seek review by a court of record of such decision, in the manner provided by the laws of the State of Washington. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.080 Severability. If any one (1) or more provision of this chapter shall be declared unconstitutional and cause invalidation for any reason, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this chapter, and this chapter shall be construed and enforced as if such unconstitutional or invalid provision had not been contained herein. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) 11.15.090 Termination date of authority to collect and expend impact fees. The City's authority to collect and expend impact fees pursuant to this chapter shall be effective until the earlier of (a) the repeal of the ordinance codified in this chapter, or (b) the determination by the State of Washington of the authorization to collect and expend impact fees. (Ord. 94-1002 § 1) Code reviser's note: This chapter, added as Chapter 11.10 by Ord. 94-1002, has been renumbered to 11.15 to avoid duplicate chapter numbers. • • Section 15.38 of the SeaTac Municipal Code relates to the S 154th Street Station area overlay district. It is difficult to determine from the website when this section of the code was approved, but according to the City website, it was sometime before July 27, 2010 (when the website was last updated). The guidelines in the section of the code do have requirements related to sidewalks (15.38.210: Vehicle and Pedestrian Circulation Requirements, 15.38.220: Pedestrian requirements, 15.38.335: Layout and Width of Street Front Pedestrian Zone, 15.38.340: Driveway Entrances [curb -cuts]). What is unclear from this section is what, if any, requirements exist for developments adjacent to but not within the overlay district. Section 15.38.335, for instance, states "New development in the South 154th Street Station Area shall provide sidewalks at the widths required within this section to contribute to the pedestrian orientation of new development" (emphasis added). Since the proposed development is not in the South 154th Street Station Area (nor even within SeaTac), this section does not apply. I was unable to find any mention of regulations for developments adjacent to the station area that are using right of way within the station area. The only other related document I found was the Action Plan for the Station Area, which was adopted in 2006. The Action Plan may be downloaded from the City website at: http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/index.aspx?page=157. I was unable to download the Action Plan, due to slow internet access (my computer was telling me it was going to take over 2 hours to download). Further steps for research could include searching the SeaTac city website for other information on the Station Overlay Area, including time frames for implementation, public notices or outreach efforts, and SEPA reviews. Station Area Plan • South 154th Street Station Area Action Plan South 154th Street Station Area Concept Plan Create a neighborhood park at Fire Station site (when existing Fire Station relocates) Encourage residential development (3 -story max adjacent to single- family residential zone) Improve pedestrian —\ environment on S 152nd and S 154th _Reserve this parking area for Farmer's Market activity // -�=Gose this � � section of Military Road; encourage mixed use `r development Encourage construction of a central parking garage to support neighborhood development Encourage small parks/plazas Improve pedestrian crossing reate a series of pedestrian ._connections and plazas from development to nellhborhood Work w WSDOT to improve SR 518 access (alternative off ramp locations) Encourage mixed use development Improve pedestrian crossing 24 December, 2006 • • Action Steps South 154th Street Station Area Action Plan PI -3 Improve streetscape along Military Rd S The City, partially in coordination with Sound Transit, should complete planned streetscape improvements along Military Rd. S., which include: • Reconstructed and widened roadway for drainage • Bicycle lanes • Pedestrian facilities Military Road S. Street trees Pedestrian scaled lighting 12' 5' Jr 12' r 12' Wide sidewalk Bike Lane Travel Lanes 1' 5' 12' • Bike Lane Wide sidewalk rinfOR -fre'C aDG-113- 141 nextniin 30 December, 2006 ti\(CV‘t 5eGIGTL G 'te \., (L(O E t)L k 0�E;1,� C' '-4t) k 61-501 �„q/ 'LrJv(.k ti -2' (1471. (Jczh Vovn Vit.,( C7u+'^c.\ 94.1 U 't) t) �c Lfc1\- ) ew��huP c7+ Follow Up Next Day i • Daily Log DATE: February 14; 15 2-,1 To Do: EEBCG Grant: Stream Grant: Notes: Call Backs C \ �-- ��a- Y2)0-94 01 C#41 j. - 11,1 i") 1.2 . (c.- N114, eqtecF- -4h- oF fa/0 cp,t),,E.k. -.7 -c_fi e1 1/12,55 2,5 45►'ce'" 1-- �-� - CVAC fcL VA. 1 hk 1i - — fl-i\\N\ • — t 004--vtiA 9tA —,cd —_C-2\'? , if/x.4441 (5 5161-1 MIA to/M_ k4t14-tir _L- • (.241:!,,k • •.. Development Review 4 mittee Date Project Name Project Address Project Contact Phone Name / —4 a_6"-- - 76' `Seo o Gomes . Phone C, C. 72e 4 73-47:a Kih-tury 7= q2 -r- z 7/, / f 7t-. .tt p ;ss- 633 The attached comments are the results of information presented at the Design Review Committee. These comments are intended to assist in the design of your project by clarifying City review requirements and standards and to help identify possible conflicts. Please be aware that it is not possible to anticipate all issues at this early stage and the subsequent plan review process may identify other concerns not mentioned at this meeting or in these comments. If you need additional information you may contact the appropriate person listed above. You may also .request to have another DRC meeting if there are still developmental issues to be resolved. • Project No. and Priority Exhibit A Project Title and Description 2011- 2020 Transportation improvement Program 2011 2012 2013 D - DESIGN S - STUDY 2014-2016 R/W - RI C - Con RE; 201 ST -829 2012 Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvements $250,000 $1,342,000 9 Installation and repair of pedestrian improvements through out the City in the neighborhoods for the purpose of creating a safe pedestrian network. Projects will be selected from the Sidewalk Ad Hoc Committee's Priority Map. D $250,000 C $1,342,000 ST -882 2012 Annual Street Overlays $400,000 - 10 Maintain and preserve the integrity of the City's existing roadway surfaces through a combination of repair to major pavement failures, crack sealing of existing pavements to extend their usable life and overlay pavements that are structurally declining. ST -122 Military Road 5 Improvements (S 176th St to 5 166th St) $450,000 $450,000 $6,500,000 11 Reconstruct roadway to provide for drainage and bicycle' and pedestrian facilities. Improvements include curb, gutter, sidewalk, bicycle lanes, storm drainage, landscaping, street lighting, channelitation, paving and undergrounding utility Tines. D $450,000 D $450,000 C $6.500,000 ST -125 Military Road S (S 152th St to 3 150n St) $300,000 $1,760,000 12 Widen existing roadway and construct sidewalks, pavement overlay, street lighting, undergrounding aerial utilities, landscaping, and storm drainage. Provide access and circulation improvements for vehide and pedestrain movements in suppport of redevelopment of the S 154th Street Station Area. D $300,000 C $1,780,000 :-✓'- ST -830 2013 Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvements $250,000 $1,374,000 13 Installation and repair of pedestrian improvements through out the City in the neighborhoods for the purpose of creating a safe pedestrian network The Project location will be selected from the Sidewalk Ad Hoc Committee's Priority Map. D $250,000 C $1,374,000 ST -883 2013 Annual Street Overlays $400,000 14 Maintain and preserve the integrity of the City's existing roadway surfaces through a combination of repair to major pavement failures, crack sealing of existing pavements to extend their usable life and overlay pavements that are structurally declining. ST -142 S 152nd St Improvements (Military Rd S to International Blvd) $200,000 ;$880,000 15 Construct night tum lane, curb, gutter, sidewalk to facilitates potential Military Rd closure between S 152nd and International Blvd in accordance with the Station Area Plan. D $200,000 C $880,000 ST -126 5 152th Street Improvements (30th Ave. 3. to Military Road 8) $800,000 $4,600,000 16 Widen existing roadway and construct sidewalks, street lighting, and storm drainage. Provide access and circulation improvements for vehicle and pedestrain movements in suppport of redevelopment. • D $800,000 C $4,600,000 6/29/2010 Page 3 Adapt Engineering, Inc. BRING LOG 615 8th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 TEL:206.654.70d5 FAX: 206.654.7048 PROJECT : Trudy's Tavem 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Job Number: WA10-16512 Boring No.: B- 1 Tukwila, WA 98188 Elevation R.t.renee : W.tI Centel t.d : V.V.1 Ground Surface Elevation: CasinoEl..eaen: No. OBSERVATIONS TESTING 1 DEPTH G (reev . J§ n Sp w -- 2 3alZ ; -2"-3" asphalt surface cover — - 0.5' 4 7 7 6 11 0.0 0.0 - -- _' Sample B1:5-10' collected © 8:30 Moist brown CLAY w/pebbles — - 5 - Wet brown silty SAND w/pebbles _. — _ - 10' — ATD - — 10 — TPt♦-HClC VOCs Boring terminated at approximately 10.0 feet bgs. Groundwater encountered at approximately 7.25 feet bgs.— Monitoring well installed, -10 feet 2" PVC column. PVC 10 slot screen from -10 feet to -5 feet. Packed with sand to - 9 feet, bentonite to - 2 feet, then concrete. Well tag: BHB 708 — — — — — — - - - - - - - - -- - - rt - ' — -15 - -20- -25- LEGEND I2 -inch 0.D. SDIi45poon Sample M Static `Nater Level at Orating DATE jr 2 -inch O.D. Geoprobe2.Static W eter Leval DATE X Sample not Recovered ,Z Perched Groundwater =.•ov Grab Sample of Analytical Racary Tlme of Tearing Used ..n. Type Drilling Page: 1 of 1 NR No ATD At Drilling Start Date: 03/29/11 Drilling Completion Date: 03/29/11 Logged By. CWB Adapt Engineering, Inc. BORING LOG 615 8th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 TEL:206.854.7045 FAX: 206.654.7048 PROJECT : Trudy's Tavem 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Job Number: WA10-16512 Boring No.: B-2 Tukwila, WA 98188 EMoral) . Re. r....: Weil C.mpi..d : UW2 Ground Boase. el...lion : C .LpEI..aWn: "A OBSERVATIONS TESTING DEPTH G 000 n 2m w I 1,z omu Z a s 2v D: � K 03< -2" asphalt surface cover No recovery 4 Tailings included brown SAND w/pebbles _ 2 ` 0-2.5' 2 NA Moist brown CLAY to_ 1 brown silty SAND w/ pebbles _ 2 — -_ z.s s 3 0.0 _5 Brown CLAY to — 8 - brown silty SAND w/ pebbles 6 _ 8 _ _ No recovery Tailings included brown SAND w/pebbles 7.5- 14 -10 10' 10 0.2 • -- Moist brown SAND 15 Sample 82:10-12.5' collected @ TPH-HCID 16 9:49 VOCs 12.5' 19 0.4 _ ATD Wet brown SAND w/pebbles 6 12.5- 16 15' 26 0.4 -15 Boring terminated at approximately 15,0 feet bgs. Groundwater encountered at approximately 12.62 feet — bgs. - — Monitoring well installed, -15 feet 2" PVC column. PVC 10 slot screen from -15 feet to -7.5 feet. Packed with -- sand to - 5 feet, bentonite to - 2 feet, then concrete. _ _ _ Well tag: BHB 709 .— - _ -20- - -- - - . — _ - -25- LEGEND I 2 -inch O.D. Split -Spoon Sample s Stalk Water Level at Drilling , Grab Sample DATE 2 -inch 0.D. Oeoprobe Static Water Levalis DATE Type of Analytical Testing Used Page: Sample not Recovered Perched Groundwater NR No Recovery _ X ATD At Time or Drilling 1 of 1 Drilling Start Date: 03/29111 Drilling Completion Date: 03/29/11 Logged By. CWB Adapt Engineering, Inc. BORING LOG 615 8th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 TEL:206.654.7045 FAX: 206.654.7048 PROJECT : Trudy's Tavem 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Job Number: WA10-16512 Boring No.: B-3 Tukwila, WA 98188 Elevation Reference : Well Completed : rare Ground Sedate elevation: Casual Eleven.: NA OBSERVATIONS TESTING 7C(7PTH Heal) O 2 W O S 0 SW �a N 2 O m§ � O C 'i � 2 EW a!< ' -2" asphalt surface cover — - Brown CLAY to 4 brown SAND w/pebbles_ 2 - _ 0_ -2.5' 2 0.5 Brown SAND w/ pebbles to 2 brown SILT — - 2 - — 2.5-5 4 0.5 - -5 — Brown SILT to - 3 - brown SAND 3 s7.5' 5 0.6 Wet brown CLAY 1 -- -7.5- -- Sample B3:7.5-10' collected @ — TPN-HCID 3 10:55 10 10' 4 0.6 VOCs Brown SILT w/pebbles and cobbles 9 8 — _10- 125' 9 0.6 - Brown silty CLAY w/pebbles __ 10 — 12.5- 9 - 15' 13 0.5 - -15 Wet brown SAND 10TPH-HCID — 15- 10 - y Sample 83:15-17.5' collected @ voce — • 17.5' 17 0.4 ATO 11:15 Wet brown SAND_ _ 17.5- 10 18 - 20 20' 30 0.3 . Boring terminated at approximately 20.0 feet bgs. — Groundwater encountered at approximately 17.06 feet bgs. — _ _ — Monitoring well installed, -20 feet 2e PVC column. PVC — - - 10 slot screen from -20 feet to -10 feet. Packed with sand to - 5 feet, bentonite to - 2 feet, then concrete. — - -- Well tag: BHB 710 -25- -- - - LEGEND 2 -nth O.D. Sp6MSpoon Sample .. Stalk Water Level at Drittng Grab Sample 2 -inch O.D. Geaprooe Stalk Water Level Type of AnaI7ka1 Testing Used DATE Page: Sample not Recovered .. perched Groundwater NR No Rao.err• X 71 ATO At Time of OPEN 1 of 1 Drilling Start Date: 03/29/11 Drilling Completion Date: 03/29/11 Logged By: CWB g-7. ip _L /.1 - 1(-1 A/Ley, i)/2J41 Sea rit-.:C ./14,1c -e eh ehi 767e,-4 .7A1.1174, R41 pxp-_12.-3- 35-gr - Ja2fp./ RA/1,0x_ 6 -it. sh( 7i-0 it -if __Iil,y2-1-144,14 ' tdr 1 • H.G.KIMURA ARCFIITrCT.I'1IC December 21, 2010 Attn. Mr. Brandon Miles, Sr. Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Design Review Board — Public Hearing Submittal Taco Time Building 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Miles: Please find attached the following: • Check for $3,895.00 (DRB Fee and Mailing Label Fees) • DRB Application Form COMMUNITY EVE OPMENT • Application Checklist • 1 set 1 l x 17 plans • Notorized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Site Howard G. Kimura, Principal RECEIVED (OEC' 21 2N • Sewer Availability Certificate • Water Availability Certificate • Site Survey • Site Plan • Sign Plans and sign brochure • Landscape Plan • Photometric Site Plan • Floor Plan • Building Elevations • Colored Elevations (1 set) • Civil Drawings • Downstream Analysis (Seatac) • Downstream Analysis (Tukwila) • Preliminary Drainage Report Please call with any questions or if further clarification is necessary. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, HG Kimura Architect, PLLC Howard G. Kimura, AIA Principal 18012 W. Lake Desire Dr. SE • Renton, WA 98058 • 425.766.5000 • Fax: 425.271.2383 • email: hgkimura@comcast.net Preliminary Technical Information Report prepared for: Taco Time NW date: December 15, 2010 ECEIVED DEC 2 3 cuw TUKWI J PUBLIC WOnK a RECEIVED DEC' 2 1. HU' o COMMUNITY DEVELOP! B L U E L 1 N E LAND 5 CENTRAL WAY SUITE 400 KIRKLAND WA 98033 ■ TEL 425-216-4051 FAX 425-216-4052 ■ THEBLUELINEGROUP.COM Tukwila Taco Time Tukwila, Washington Preliminary Technical Information Report Prepared for: Taco Time NW 3300 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98058 Original Date: December 15, 2010 Blueline Job No. 10-080 Prepared by: Geoff E. Tamble, PE !EXPIRES 06/25If B L U E L I N E LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTMG 25 CENTRAL WAY SUITE 400 KIRKLAND WA 98033 ■ TEL 425-218-4051 FAX 425-218-4052 ■ THEBLUELINEGROUP.COM Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Table of Contents SECTION 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-1 SECTION 2 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 2-1 2.1 Conditions of Approval 2-1 SECTION 3 OFFSITE ANALYSIS 3-1 SECTION 4 DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY DESIGN 41 4.1 Design Standards 4-1 4.2 Existing Conditions 4-2 4.3 Developed Site 4-2 4.4 Vault Performance 4-2 4.5 Water Quality Analysis and Design 4-2 SECTION 5 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5-1 5.1 Onsite Conveyance System 5-1 SECTION 6 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 6-2 SECTION 7 OTHER PERMITS 7-1 SECTION 8 TESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 8-1 SECTION 9 BOND QUANTITIES AND FACILITIES SUMMARY 9-1 SECTION 10 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 10-1 Appendix • Existing Conditions Exhibit • Developed Conditions Exhibit • Pondcalc Worksheet • Soils Exhibit Job # 10-080 Page i Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 1 Project Overview The study area is three parcels (A, B & C) totaling 1.35 acres that currently has two existing commercial buildings. The applicant is proposing to create 2 new Tots through the boundary line adjustment process (Parcel 1 is the south parcel and Parcel 2 is the north parcel), remove one of the buildings, build one new building and reconfigure the parking and add landscaping. This preliminary drainage report is only for the south 0.61 acre parcel (Parcel 1) because the north parcel is not making enough surface modifications (roughly 1,600 square feet of replaced impervious surface) to trigger any of the drainage manual requirements. Please reference the developed conditions exhibit included in the appendix. The site is located at 15037 Tukwila International Boulevard in Tukwila, Washington. Please see the Vicinity Map below. More generally, the site is located in Section 22, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. VICINITY MAP _ N0110 SCNf Job # 10-080 -, Page 1-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report The site currently contains two existing buildings, driveways and paved parking areas. The site is essentially 100% impervious. A downstream analysis was prepared by The Blueline Group on December 15, 2010 and has been submitted to the City of Tukwila under a separate cover. In general, all runoff will be conveyed to the proposed onsite detention and water quality faculties. The site will incorporate detention and water quality design parameters as outlined in the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Tukwila. Job # 10-080 Di Page 1-2 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 2 Conditions and Requirements Summary 2.1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NA Core Requirement #1: Discharge at the Natural Location In the existing condition, runoff from the site sheet flows to the south / southeast and is collected by a series of catch basins along the east and south property lines that convey the stormwater runoff to the east. In the developed condition, discharge from the detention facility will be tightlined to the existing conveyance system along the east property line. All runoff in the developed condition will continue to flow east towards Tukwila International Boulevard. Core Requirement #2: Off-site Analysis Submitted under separate cover. A Level 1 Downstream Analysis was prepared by The Blueline Group and dated December 15, 2010. Core Requirement #3: Flow Control See Section 4. The facility will release post -developed runoff according to the Conservation Flow Control Standard (KCRTS Level 2) of the 2009 KCSWDM. The water quality volume is designed from the Basic Water Quality Menu of the 2009 KCSWDM. The preliminary drawings show the approximate size of the detention and water quality system. The site is proposing to detain stormwater in an underground facility (36" CMP pipes are currently shown) and water quality treatment will be provided with storm -filter catch basins that will treat the stormwater prior to entering the detention facility. The Conservation Flow Control Standard may need to be modified through the 2009 KCSWDM adjustment process to help mitigate the potential impact of a cost prohibitive stormwater detention and water quality system. Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System See Section 5. The conveyance system will be designed in accordance with the 2009 KCSWDM. The system will be designed to convey the 100 -year, 24-hour storm event without overtopping. Job # 10-080 Page 2-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Core Requirement #5: Erosion and Sediment Control See Section 8. The temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be comprised of temporary measures (rock entrance, inlet protection, silt fence, etc.) as well as permanent measures (hydroseeding and landscaping). The Final Engineering Drawings will contain more detailed information. Core Requirement #6: Operations and Maintenance See Section 10. The detention facility will be privately maintained. Core Requirement #7: Financial Guarantees and Liability See Section 9. Core Requirement #8: Water Quality See Section 5. The water quality portion of the vault will be designed to comply with the 2009 KCSWDM's Basic Water Quality Menu for water quality treatment. Storm -filter catch basins will treat the stormwater prior to entering the detention facility. Job # 10-080 Page 2-2 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 3 Offsite Analysis A Level 1 Downstream Analysis was prepared by The Blueline Group on December 15, 2010 and has been submitted to the City of Tukwila under a separate cover. Job # 10-080 3 Page 3-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 4 Detention and Water Quality Design The detention facility and storm filter system will detain and treat the runoff from the developed site. The detention facility will release runoff at durations matching that of the existing historical condition (Conservation Flow Control Standard). The Conservation Flow Control Standard may need to be modified through the 2009 KCSWDM adjustment process to help mitigate the potential impact of a cost prohibitive stormwater detention and water quality system. 4.1 DESIGN STANDARDS The detention facility will be sized using King County's computer program KCRTS. The facility will release post -developed runoff according to KCRTS Level 2 — Conservation Flow Control Area of the 2009 KCSWDM. The water quality volume is designed according to the Basic Water Quality Menu of the 2009 KCSWDM. The Conservation Flow Control Standard may need to be modified through the 2009 KCSWDM adjustment process to help mitigate the potential impact of a cost prohibitive stormwater detention and water quality system. The KCRTS program was developed as a hydrologic modeling tool for western King County. The runoff files have been pre -simulated for a range of land cover conditions and soil types for different regions of King County using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's HSPF10 model. The KCRTS Conservation Flow Control Standard (Level 2) requires the project to maintain the flow durations for the developed site to the historical (forested) condition for 'A the 2 -year storm event up to the 50 -year storm event. The regional scale factor for the site is SeaTac 1.0 (See KCSWDM Figure 3.2.2.A — Rainfall Regions and Regional Scale Factors included in the Appendix). The estimated size of the detention facility was determined using the Pondcalc Worksheet available on the KCSWDM website (provided in the Appendix of this report). The detailed engineering calculations will be provided at the final engineering submittal. Job # 10-080 Page 4-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Assuming the city of Tukwila approves a drainage adjustment. Assumptions are below 0.30 acres Pasture 0.31 acres Forest 0.61 acres Total 4.3 DEVELOPED SITE Runoff from the developed site has been calculated based on the developed site plan. Please see the Developed Conditions Exhibit in the appendix. All areas have been delineated using AutoCAD. The following shows the breakdown of the land cover for the detained area. 0.14 Acres Lawn 0.47 Acres Impervious 0.61 Acres Total 4.4 VAULT PERFORMANCE The detention facility will be sized during final engineering and will comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Conservation Flow Control Standard with modifications through the drainage adjustment process. 4.5 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The water quality portion of the vault will be designed to comply with the 2009 KCSWDM's Basic Water Quality Menu for water quality treatment. Storm filter catch basins will be used to satisfy this requirement. Job # 10-080 3 Page 4-2 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 5 Conveyance System Analysis and Design 5.1 ONSITE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM The conveyance system will be sized during final engineering and will comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Job # 10-080 Page 5-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 6 Special Reports and Studies At this time, there are no additional reports and studies associated with this project. Job # 10-080 Page 6-2 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 7 Other Permits At this time, there are no additional permits associated with this project. Job # 10-080 Page 7-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 8 TESC Analysis and Design At this time, a TESC Analysis and Design is not required. Job # 10-080 Page 8-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 9 Bond Quantities and Facilities Summary At this time, Bond Quantities and a Facilities Summary is not required. Job # 10-080 Page 9-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Section 10 Operations and Maintenance The detention facility will be privately maintained. At this time, the operations and maintenance requirements manual is not required. Job # 10-080 Page 10-1 Tukwila Taco Time Preliminary Technical Information Report Appendix Job # 10-080 Page A SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC ZZ, TWP 23N, ROE 4E, W.M. Ircup E 331.9 (N) le' CP E 332.3 (S) (POSSIBLY ABAIWIID) 29 QI,NCRA( AND 42' NEST PR(yL'R7Y CoR R . '. 474 e• cow E 331.7E (N) (CENTER CHANNEL) { 77777 77='/777/ N 8' E COYC (R9 e: CpVC.J3L� (C SE) .. CtEn/. .... i. 4SN1R7N AND a7 N[Sr OF PROP7R TY CORNER 47, --�!v 2-srocr Noce S7RUCR,AE / / / / / 4 / / N0 gMpNr Nv R 02008 DE IL.E7JNE ORCP b 8E32&7(I4 5) eW HERC CNA9.4 ) n tl 11 ; 11; Io to /m r2" 171 5321 (N) WYE J12.0 (s) 6' ADS E 332.2 Nl 11 /1 // • ..:.// I7../, , 8' E 3264 (I( 5) (CENTER CHANNEL) t r CORC E 329.9 (NJ e' CONC E 1297 (E) •‘2 0T i / 12' C E 3.297 (5) ` 12" 0H E 322.7 (S) (Q /(r e'A05 E329.7 (N9 SCALE: 1" = 40' 0 10 20 40 UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTE U10ERGRO,MD UTIIJ1ES ARE 9KON N 71E APPROXIMATE LOCATIOK DERE NO GUARANTEE THAT ALL UTILITY IDES ARE SNOW OR THAT 7►E LOCATIOIL SIZE AND MATERIAL E ACCURATE 71E CONTRACTOR SHALL UNCOIER AU. NOME= PIPING MERE CROWNS INTERFERENCES OR CON ECAO'NS OCCUR PRIOR TO TRRENCII NG OR R XCAYATION Re ANY PPE OR STRUCTURES 70 DETERMINE ACTUAL LOCAT7CNS. saw AND MATINAL 77E CON1R1C7LN SHALL JUKE TIE APPROPRIATE RRON9OV FOP PROTECTION OF SAD MONIES HE CONTRACTOR MALL NOM' IMECALL AT I-800-4424-55555 MD ARRANGE E POR FILO LOCATION Cr EXISTING FACLITIES BEFORE CLM67Rt CIT ML R[1i1 r' BLUELINE SCALE.: AS NOVO PROJECT MANAGER: COW C IAMBIC K PROECT ENGINEER: COW £ TAMIL PC 0£9GNER.$ 00i/nQE ONIA{DON SSUE OA TE 2/10/7@D • t O ii E a f. • k a z JOS MUMMER: 1 0-080 BMW NAME: EC -01 78' cup 12 337.9 (N) re OLP 12 3323 (S) (Posy& r AameovED) 1 1' SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC 22, TWP 23N, RGE 4E, W.M. 2 ':al'NORD. AND 1.2. *EST PEATY CO7NE,F R 7. 8 CONC 12 47.2 (N) (CENTER CHANNEL) N .88 re CONC (R) e' CONC.332. (E sr) CCENTER.R7Arov£L9 ..:. .•0 123333 (RT (rani TUR7400RN ELBOW) OR) 7-5TOT7 CONCRETE s7RUcfJRE TD moot .7� P 0.Y NORM AND 0.7. REST Cr PROPERTY CORNER y % 2-57087 ROOD L _ smucn.WE 4 FF'D0�QNIR.pD X MAN( IN 97A55 0150 ON r SG CONCRE2 MONUMENT N GSE. DOW 0.8' (WELD FOR ) r OF TANGENCY Cr GEHTERUNE 70/27/2070 Ce 48 9.123217(9. 5) 9 PVC 077NA 7 ) / ASEVEN1 w RAE e -PTS 12 3.2e 8.405 12 3229 r2. Di 12 3.327 (9) 72.0 12 1320 (5) r Aos le 3323 (RT 77.5 s9 e• 7£ 328.4 (9 5) (CENTER CHANNEL) 0ma DEBLIEWL1(NOW .12 Ca4C 4,220-1 N)` . .3 CO4C 1A. PAPP) _ PRp•ER(f•}/iE • e• CONI 8 329.9 (9) e• CONIC 12 329.7 (2) UTAOfES 72.01' 329.7 (4) • _ / 7201232 / 9.40571'39.729.7(S) R) SCALE: 1" = 40' LICIDemmely UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTE U10ERGROtD- U7U1ES ARE SHOWN N THE APPRCLNIAIE LOCATION DQE IS NO GIJARANIEE THAT ALL UMLITT LIES ARE SHOW OR THAT INE LX.47 11. 9g AND MATENAL IS ACt2IPAIE TIE Lb4TRACRK SMALL UNCOVER ALL INDICATED PIPING NIH EE CROSS"; NTEREE1EIKES OR CONAILZ7lONS OCCUR PRIOR TO TRENCHING OR E7CCAVA1I 4 POP ANY PPE OR SRLICTUES 113 L1E7E70/E ACTWL LOCOS= SIZE AID MAMMAL THE COIIIRACTOR SHALL MAZE TIE AeemeEATE PROICTIOM FOP PROTECROM OF SAO FALi1TES TIE OONTRACTCR SHALL NOSY masal. AT l -80O-4.24-3153 MD ARRANGE E FOR RED LOCATION OF °SS "AMITIES BEFORE CONSDM/CTIOlt ejA BLUELINE !' SCALE- AS CALEAS NOTED PRDJEc r MANAGER: OEOW E TARE PE PROJECT ENGINEER: Qvr E imam PC DESIGNER: OOMOE 04•41.001 SSUE DATE: ?/T4/20T0 • C • a 2 0 W 0 J 41tai0 W 0 J 2 0 m 2 W Ja1 1.UMIE0: 10-080 smear NAME: OC -0 1 sen -___L_ or _1 Pondcalc Worksheet Instructions: 1 Enter site information in the yellow highlighted cells 2 Verify no error message is displayed 3 Results are displayed in Green Box *Note: pondcalc will not work for negative landcover conversions. pondcalc does not handle existing El or TG very well Disclaimer: This spreadsheet is provided without warranty of any kind. Use this spreadsheet at your own risk. All facility sizes should be verified using KCRTS software. Rainfall Region Scale Factor: FC Level: ST 1.00 2 {either ST or LA see rainfall regions map} { 0.8 - 1.2 see rainfall regions map) { 1, 2, or 3 see flow control app map} Predeveloped Landcover Postdeveloped acres type acres 0.31 0.3 TF TP TG El 0.14 0.47 Adjusted Acres converted cover 0.31 0.3 0.14 0.47 Error Messages TF= till forest, TP = till pasture, TG = till grass, El = effective impervious Acreage Check: gross adjusted post pre 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 r"*= SSC s�p���► -)1_)t}p5 Level 1 Downstream Analysis (Tukwila) prepared for: Taco Time NW date: December 15, 2010 RECEIVED DEC 23 ZuWu TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS RECEIVED DEC 2/, 2•\ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B L U E L I N E LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING 25 CENTRAL WAY SUITE 400 KIRKLAND WA 98033 ■ TEL 425-216-4051 FAX 425-216-4052 ■ THEBLUELINEGROUP.COM N( TUKWILA TACO TIME PROPERTY Tukwila, Washington LEVEL 1 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Prepared For: Taco Time NW December 15, 2010 Blueline Job #10-080 Prepared by Geoff E. Tamble, PE Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Table of Contents Task 1: Study Area Definition and Maps 1 Task 2: Resource Review 2 Task 3: Field Inspection 3 Downstream Basin 3 Upstream Basin 4 Task 4: Drainage System Description 5 Task 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems 6 Appendix • Existing Conditions Exhibit • Developed Conditions Exhibit • Downstream Drainage Exhibit • Offsite Analysis Drainage System Table • USGS Scientific Investigations Map 2855 • King County Sensitive Areas Folio Exhibits Erosion Hazard Areas (None Mapped) Landslide Hazard Areas (None Mapped) Seismic Hazard Areas (None Mapped) Streams and 100 -Year Floodplains (None Mapped) Wetlands (None Mapped) 12/14/2010 Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Task 1: Study Area Definition and Maps The site is located at 15037 Tukwila International Boulevard. A site investigation was conducted on Thursday, December 2, 2010, on a cold and foggy day. The study area is three parcels (A, B & C) totaling 1.35 acres that currently has two existing commercial buildings. The applicant is proposing to create 2 new Tots through the boundary line adjustment process, remove one of the buildings, build one new building and reconfigure the parking and add landscaping. Please reference the developed conditions exhibit included in the appendix. The downstream system was analyzed from the site to the ultimate receiving waters of Gilliam Creek. In general, site runoff flows from northwest to southeast. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 12/14/2010 Page 1 Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Task 2: Resource Review The best available resource information as well as any other applicable information was reviewed for existing or potential problems. The following is a summary of some of the findings from the information used in preparing this report (see the Appendix for exhibits). • USGS Scientific Investigations Map 2855, the site soil type is Qvt, Glacial Till. • The site is not located in an Erosion Hazard Area • The site is not located in a Seismic Hazard Area • The site does not contain any Streams or Flood Plains • The site does not contain any identified Wetlands • The site is not located in a Landslide Hazard Area. 12/14/2010 Page 2 Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Task 3: Field Inspection The site, upstream and downstream field investigations were conducted on Thursday, December 2, 2010, on a cold and foggy day with temperatures approximately 40 degrees. The site is predominantly pavement with two existing commercial buildings. Below are the descriptions of both the upstream and downstream drainage basins of the subject property. The site is located in the City of Tukwila and is fronted by two roadways, Military Road in the City of Sea Tac and Tukwila International Boulevard in the City of Tukwila. This investigation will discuss the drainage basin in the city of Tukwila onsite and along Tukwila International Boulevard. Downstream Basin (Please see the Downstream Drainage Exhibit) Runoff onsite is collected in various catch basins located throughout the site. Stormwater generally flows from northwest to south east and is collected and discharged offsite at various locations along the south property line into private property (A) and to the east property line fronting Tukwila International Boulevard (B). All of these systems combine into one system in Tukwila International Boulevard within 100' from the site (C). Tukwila International Boulevard is a multi -lane lane crowned road running north/south along the east frontage of the site. The drainage system in this roadway consists fully improved concrete curb and gutter systems with storm inlets. This runoff is collected and conveyed to the south in a series of storm pipes and catch basins to across the intersection with South 152nd Street before crossing east into a private system located on the McDonalds property (D). The storm system continues in an easement through the McDonalds property and into a Sound Transit Park & Ride Parking lot before discharging into the storm system located in the ROW of South 154th Street (E). This system discharges south into private property (Southwicke Apartments) in an open ditch system before being tightlined under the parking lot that is a part of the apartment complex (F). This system ultimately discharges to Gilliam Creek that meanders east along the Highway 518 and Southcenter Boulevard alignments (G) before discharging to Green River well over 1/4 mile downstream. No erosion problems or evidence of flooding were observed during the site visit. 12/14/2010 Page 3 Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Upstream Basin There isn't really a basin upstream to the site since the frontage storm system in Military Road collects most of the runoff (roughly 99%) upstream of the site. The basin upstream of the frontage is approximately 17 acres and consists of a mix of single family residential, multi -family residential, and commercial buildings. The basin is northwest of the site and extends north to S 150th Street and as far west as 26th Ave South. The storm system is a mixture of tightline conveyance systems and open ditch and culvert systems. The system did not show any signs of erosion or flooding at the time of the visit. 12/14/2010 Page 4 Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Task 4: Drainage System Description The proposed stormwater collection, dispersion, and water quality system will be designed in accordance with the rules and regulations required by the City of Tukwila. The proposed stormwater collection, dispersion, and water quality system will be designed in accordance with the rules and regulations required by the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Tukwila. A series of underground 36" CMP pipes will be used to provide flow control detention. Roof and footing drains as well as catch basins to collect runoff from the road will be connected to the proposed detention facility. The detention facility will be sized according to the King County Conservation detention standard. The KCRTS Level 2 Standard requires the project to maintain the flow durations for the developed site to the historical site conditions (forested) for % the 2 - year storm event up to the 50 -year storm event. The project will satisfy the Basic Water Quality menu by utilizing storm filter catch basins that will treat the water prior to entering the detention system. 12/14/2010 Page 5 Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Task 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems Development of the subject parcel will follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical report for pavement, utility installation, and building construction. The Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan will be designed in accordance with King County standards. All TESC facilities will be periodically inspected and maintained as necessary during construction to minimize impacts to the downstream system. 12/14/2010 Page 6 Tukwila Taco Time Downstream Analysis Appendix 12/14/2010 Page 7 .0 14 pe 1 7010 - &JOva - Ow Opabo Man E \Rofab\10080\a,A• iab\100B0Ccap O 1 OHL M011111 111101 rl! z 0 r. 0 0�0 ro ___--Ss- °Yard ASY.1111N1M— �}�- NIYP1 tl3_YM10 0 __SS-�`— — ss —55�J= —�ss :x: ,>;�.,."� ^v�r:;'•.i:'{�o.''.w.')r�+` #,gin,,:{ 0 ti Aim 00 9191 v t 4 --ss D8t ; 66.50 C" -C* o2p` 1„,1'q M 6A 0q 8' 0y^1 S•• 0919 0, HN-2 1:... 7-44t. R� wc�C 7._ `\ qp SP� 414/0 Aif"Cy14yr,0 4NN.r!`"�o'`"v tel\\`` 8gY'q� 10 rq 7.4.e04/7./y04 ill) ss/ e 0 �D o m o 0 • IV ti SMELT NAM(: EC -01 JOI NUMBER: 10-080 EXISTING CONDITIONS EXHIBIT TUKWILA TACO TIME RETAURANT BUILDING SCALE. AS MORD PROJECT MANAGER: ~_ ROT E TAMIL PC PROJECT ENGINEER: OEOT E TANG PE DESIGNER: ~ME GARMAN ISSUE DATE rsn;.zmo =e ?1I i8} BLUELINE . No DATE EY REV:MONS NNWC 1 SEND & TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVIJ CITY OF, TUKWILA WASHINGTON 24.16 0.e 1; 2010 - G mn - Ur dguooldon e \Ro7Kb\10080\Op\uJ1Lib\100800C.lp INTO 2 0 0 r 0 o 0 D or' 0— W n N At . I lg OrNO 0q l "4" m a DEVELOPED CONDITIONS EXHIIBIT TUKWILA TACO TIME RETAURANT BUILDING NNWC 1 52ND & TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON SCALE A! NOTED PROJECT MANAGER: OEOIN TAMIL PE PROJECT ENGINEER: OEDAL TALL PE DESIGNER: . CIONI OLE GA N.DON ISSUE DA TE rovaso Ili 1 "NO Itl f: iin IA BLUELINE $ No DAtr ay rurls:DNS Basin: Green River OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Subbasin Name: Gillian Creek Subbasin Number: N/A Symbol Drainage Component Type, Name, and Size Drainage Component Description Slope Distance from site discharge Existing Problems Potential Problems Observations of field inspector, resource reviewer, or resident see map Type: sheet flow, swale, stream, channel, pipe, pond; Size: diameter, surface area drainage basin, vegetation, cover, depth, type of sensitive area, volume % ' ml = 1,320 ft. constrictions, under capacity, ponding, overtopping, flooding, habitat or organism destruction, scouring, bank sloughing, sedimentation, incision, other erosion tributary area, likelihood of problem, overflow pathways, potential impacts Site Sheet Flow Paved parking lot 1% 0' None None Sheet flow to lot CB's A 12" pipe Tightline system 1% 0' None None rede will kefaow and reduce peak flows B 12" pipe Tightline system 2% 0' None None Site will detain and reduce peak flows C 12"-18" pipe Tightline system 1% 100' None None Site will detain and reduce peak flows D 18" pipe Tightline system 2% 400' None None Site reducelll peaketain flowsand E 24" pipe Tightline system 8% 950' None None Site will detain and reduce peak flows F 24" pipe Tightline system 12% 1,300' None None Site will detain and reduce peak flows G Outfall/Stream Tightline system 5% 1,900' None None Site will detain and reduce peak flows Tukwila 1/9/2009 Ft 111111.0...1 1 i r i { r 1 .._._ . t+: 2010 KLtg County 1 r' Ttie•tntormattop Induded:oRpts map nas,beenrcomplled byl(ing. Coynty-alarr tro .� varletY otsoorces and is sobtea c�'.cnanser atatit-rtpuc i0tle_r1 C' my makes re resentatirias oi1Wtiiientt r,exprAaia or:4Pplred as Ro accuia icompletenesof,dniegnesa i!cRtghts to ibO pap 6� dtict)'inrorntauon ., Th document aanotltt'ettdedfor�as}��ey(produc.t(In Coon lihaIInott lIabletoCan9`q eral4apeclat indirecKG1 entAt, c tiseg4_entul damapae'kibludinor�butnot nited'ta rrestr ups or ost pr Is:rosut rrgm gse'tise ar m(sus of a hl orm8Uon contain on inaprt� �, my Inr«met<orr onfh� rt awisr�rohron excep bY'NdBep:parm o <t1 i cauniv ; a . �tl *3 � ,_...... z 3+7",r it i5"t q. z .rp ir Y-?... �r ; , .�, Date.,l2l&2ott} .; SourcatKingCauntyIMAP_'SensltivgAkeas.t1140.1 vwwmetrokt:9ov/Q13/iWiAP 593ft I'_1 ds/ County Boundary Mountain Peaks Highways Incorporated Area Streets Iiigtveg y Artemis Loc1 Parcels SAO Stream ce51 (cord) •■■1 OMNI ■■■I Legend Clatt 2 Pittortrtill CLus 2 Satnoftitd Cs3 Unc ific S Lakes and Large Rivers Streams 100 Year floodplain SAO Wetland SAO Landslide SAO Coal Mine SAO Seismic SAO Erosion •Cou tty A�kkes na r$:s tat�a �r n, as, exp ess orimpng�Counto aact1 :ccmpIetenes�s tUmdt ess or gph�tsxtot�s use oR sucti Information Kirjzi Tt11J,yodlmenfiit fntended,fofusea ,a'euivey; yct,pn gaurtty,h notbe lab. ocenygener& 9peeiaf iKdlree ctdentat or consequential.. +damages nc1Ud ng Ifmlted toe foot rev yes qst ftsrgsultln fior the us ar ova, ttheeeIlnf n ccgtt!rad thts,inap Any geie of TORRORtIl °�k 4'h _� rctw •Date:12Y6/It#10., ' t�ourCetlpg,P:oitnty iMAri Sertskifro Area, hhpJ/wwNiitttetroko.doiggIS/I A ) ar�a►vr+lU RECEIVED 14816 Military Road South®Fc 21 2z2; P.O. Box 69550 �'�' Tukwila, WA 98168 COMMUNITY Phone: (206) 242-3236 off' OPM T Fax: (206) 242-1527 CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON-AVAILABILITY Residential: $50 Commercial: $100 ❑ Certificate of Sewer Availability OR Certificate of Sewer Non -Availability Part A: (To Be Completed by Applicant) . Purpose of Certificate: Design Review Tukwila Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD 0 Other ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone Proposed Use: 0 Residential Single Family 0 Residential Multi -Family ® Commercial 0 Other Howard G. Kimura, AIA 425-766-5000 Applicants Name:. Phone: Property Address or Approximate Location: Tax Lot Number: 004100-0493 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Legal Description(Attach Map and Legal Description if necessary): See Attached site plan and Legal Part B: (To Be Completed by Sewer Agency) 1. JE a. Sewer Service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing b size sewer 0 feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR 0 b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: 0 (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and/or 0 (2) the construction of a collection system on the site; and/or 0 (3) other (describe): 2. (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) 0 a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan, OR 0 b. The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. 41 a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the District, OR 0 b. Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: PERMIT: $ a. District Connection Charges due prior to connection: GFC: $ SFC: $ UNIT: $ TOTAL: $ (Subject to Change on January 1st) A King County/METRO Capacity Charge will be billed directly by King County after connection to the sewer system. b. Easements: ❑ Required 0 May be Required c. Other: Cli4y 4i,...1 cti .f+`x Kurt co ow& ,.,c -f-1, 4 e-.-c.1e"f -Fp v- 1r /rs4cof 3,' ,4vY2�, I hereby certify that the above sewer agency information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from tje date of signature. By Title 1e).) ////c4 Date ATTACHMENT TO VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON-AVAILABILITY The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Val Vue Sewer District ("District") Certificate of Sewer Availability/Non-Availability ("Certificate"). 1. This Certificate is valid only for the real property referenced herein ("Property"), which is in the District's service area, for the sole purpose of submission to the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, King County Department of Public Health, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, City of Burien and/or City of SeaTac. This Certificate is between the District and the applicant only, and no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency, third -party beneficiary principles or otherwise. 2. This Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant and its successors and assigns, and does not constitute and may not be relied upon as the District's guarantee that sewer service will be available at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 3. As of the date of the District's signature on this Certificate, the District represents that sewer service is available to the Property through sewer systems that exist or that may be extended by the applicant. The District makes no other representations, express or implied, including without limitation that the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals and authorizations from King County, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, City of Burien, City of SeaTac or any other governmental agency before the applicant can utilize the sewer service which is the subject of this Certificate. 4. If the District or the applicant must extend the District's sewer system to provide sewer service to the Property, the District or applicant may be required to obtain from the appropriate governmental agency the necessary permits, approvals and authorizations. In addition, the governmental agency may establish requirements that must be satisfied as a condition of granting any such permits, approvals or authorizations, which may make impractical or impossible the provision of sewer services to the Property. 5. Application for and possible provision of sewer service to the Property shall be subject to and conditioned upon availability of sewer service to the Property at the time of such application, and compliance with federal, state, local and District laws, ordinances, policies, and/or regulations in effect at the time of such application. 1 acknowledge that 1 have received the Certificate of Sewer Availability/Non-Availability and this Attachment, and fully understand the terns and conditions herein. Ap Date SITE PLAN 11 11-10-2010 PROPOSED TACO TIME RESTAURANT NNWC 152ND & TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA, WA i �yyry i H.G. Kimura ua+nln PLLC E�YJL Iplwvl(Wwwouo Fax W.W.II WM W. WDoWMSC ...WA WOW • • RECEIVED DEC '2g 2N DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Comnuiniiy Developsnenl 6300 Southeenter Bavievard, 7iikwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: trikpiart t4ci.tukwila wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND BOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OP WASHINGTON COUNTY OF ICING The undersigned being duly swots and upon oath slates as follows: 1 [ em the outrenn comer of the property which is the subject of this application. 1. Aft statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and me true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and content. 4. Owner grant' the City, its envie ecs, ; eats, en _+'mem, coutrectors or other representatives the ri ht to enter upon Owner's real property, located at I 1 . � t /IJ ii 17 r ♦ Vb . 7-l) tA)I .. ,+- w 4 eel? / ff sr for the purpose of eppliaWon review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons at property mewing on the private property during the City's entry upon the miserly, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refired of fan, if the applicant docs not respond to specific requests for items on the"CompleteApplhmtion Checklist' within ninety (90) days. EXECUTED et fUV /l I_ IA- othmLon 140/ 010 L'41-1-32-5ci(vt;x31 �vX132 9r 2V fin/ WA �%�d2� (Addres f2 -S. 72:73 e'..rxNumbcr) 1 ��yn,�}��'. %(Signature) On this day personalty appeared before me P!!,rb K _%[4 -1 /1�(/ to be the individual who execuud the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that heeko signed the same as sther voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 1 DAY OF 20 l li NOTAR p138 o 77.• of Washi�n¢ J_,�,� residing at C�/ to ter/ TY�i.t.Y� ► U� ) My Commission expires on l / ( 1 /Z 7 I/ 10 • CITY OF TUKWILA RECEIVED Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, W41�81 �rJ Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3663 COMMUNE E-mail: tukplan@ci. tukwila. wa. us DEVELOPMENT 1 PUBLIC HEARING DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 1,�v 7THE S,7Aj/Jr2fbvZ- RcCCIVED DEC 21 202 COMMUNITY LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacan4 M t T lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. lS D '7 TUKWI L4 /N1"/Z.A44-77Othtt. 8 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 004/oo-493 / - 0iL94 ooWoo- 0`90 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Mvalar-0( U. Kt41vrz3' Address: td V g ok- S9 �f / S.- /eedi iv Az Phone: 7f,- S-1,00 FAX: SLZJ- 27/— 23 d'3 P:\Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp-6-0b.doc December 4, 2006 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P -DR Planner: File Number: j_ 10 _ 01-7 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 1,�v 7THE S,7Aj/Jr2fbvZ- RcCCIVED DEC 21 202 COMMUNITY LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacan4 M t T lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. lS D '7 TUKWI L4 /N1"/Z.A44-77Othtt. 8 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 004/oo-493 / - 0iL94 ooWoo- 0`90 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Mvalar-0( U. Kt41vrz3' Address: td V g ok- S9 �f / S.- /eedi iv Az Phone: 7f,- S-1,00 FAX: SLZJ- 27/— 23 d'3 P:\Planning Forms \ Applications \BARApp-6-0b.doc December 4, 2006 .n 0 COMPLETE APPLICATION ChECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: V 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. V. 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). V 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17". 1/ 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. te„-- 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). ef1fr I 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 7. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 8. Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple -family buildings-- e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout).Or you may pay the City to generate the mailing labels. See Land Use Fee Schedule under `Public Notice Mailing labels" for the fee amount. 9. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: P 10. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). ✓ 11. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. I,- 12. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria, see application. This is your opportunity to highlight the design features of your project. M 13. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/dcdplan.htm) for additional information. P:\Forms\2009 Applications\Design Review -Public Hearing-JAN09.doc Check items submitted with application Information Reired.II May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning SURVEY: VI 14 (a) The survey must include a graphic scale and north arrow. It shall be drawn with black ink in record of survey format. This shall be stamped by the surveyor. x,87 (b) An existing and proposed boundary and topographic survey (2 ft. contours including a minimum 20 ft. beyond the property line) with all structures, easements, encumbrances and right-of-way width. Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. e (c) Existing and proposed building footprints. Dov Irk p r ; (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. ®W SQ,; (e) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. SITE PLAN: if 15 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24"x36". '® (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. 'ot (c) Vicinity Map with site location, does not have to be to scale. toe (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. V" (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. tO (f) Loading and service areas. NA (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors, height and materials. (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. v" (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. WA (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50%). LANDSCAPE PLAN: 16 (a) Landscape planting plan that meets the standards at TMC 18.52 by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36". �� (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: Er�./ 17 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15%, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36". 1 (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. (d) Existing and proposed building footprints. CIVIL PLANS: 18 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36". V (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations P:\Forms\2009 Applications\Design Review -Public Hearing-JAN09.doc AIL Check items submitted with application Information RecillPed. 111, May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning v/ to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/pubwks/bulletins/floodcontrol.pdf for further information v (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. V (d) Total expected cut and fill. (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. f (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/pubwks/pwpermit.htm#techinfo. (- (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. 244 (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. �✓' (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: 19. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. v 20. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. 21. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is recommended. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). V- 22. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. • 23. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. P:\Forms\2009 Applications\Design Review -Public Hearing-JAN09.doc CITY OF TUKWILA �� 2NBOUNDARY LINE Department of Community Develop ent 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188•' �:�_ ;_ADJUSTMENT/LOT Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 43123665` ' " `CONSOLIDATION E-mail: tukptan@ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Tukwila Taco Time �Q..Q& CA �� s LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 15037 Tukwila international Blvd, LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 0041000494, 0041000493, 0041000690 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Chris Tonkin Address: 3300 Maple Valley Highway, Renton, WA 98058 Phone: (4991 226-6656 x239 E-mail: chris®Lacp - .com Signature: FAX: (425) 228-8226 Date: 111,11),vto FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-BLA/LC Pianner:'Ayvbj� File Number: �1h� p"1 Application Complete (Date: ) Protect File Number: /(1 ei5er 2 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: 10- 0 1-7 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Tukwila Taco Time �Q..Q& CA �� s LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 15037 Tukwila international Blvd, LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 0041000494, 0041000493, 0041000690 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Chris Tonkin Address: 3300 Maple Valley Highway, Renton, WA 98058 Phone: (4991 226-6656 x239 E-mail: chris®Lacp - .com Signature: FAX: (425) 228-8226 Date: 111,11),vto City of Tukwila Depnomm of Community DaveMumma 6300 SaMcente Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 66166 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3666 Errlall: hdipWlibdcwila.Wa.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER DECLARATION Know all men by these present that we, the undersigned, owner(s) In fes simple of the land herein described do hereby male a boundary line adjustment The undersigned furter denims this boundary line adjustment to be the graphic representation of said boundary lino adjustment and the sane is mads with the free consent and In accordance with the desire of the owner(s). In witness whereof we have set our hands and seals. Name: Name: Name: Name: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the Individual who executed the within and foregoing Instrument and acknowledged that heNhs signed the sone as hlslher voluntary ant and deed for the MN and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of . 20_ Signature: Name as commissioned: Title: My appointment expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personalty appeared before me to me known to be the Individual who executed the Ydtidn and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that helshe signed the same as Mather voluntsry ant and dead, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal thls day o1 20 Signature: Name as commissioned: Tltie: My appointment expires: LAND SURVEYOR'S . - TIFICATE registered as a land surveyor • the St1G ' Washington, certify that this plat Is based on an actual survey of the land described Main, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown hereon correctly; and that monuments other than bass monuments approved for setting ata tater date, have been set and lot comers staked on the ground as depicted on the plat SURVEY Of SW .154 OF NW 1H RECORDING CER161CATE Fid kr mad rOenp.YeMat/ enk*4.0 OF SECTION 22. T.23N,R4E, dry of m r ansa par_ M. ed W.M.. IN 1660 COUNTY, WASHINGTON raaded N Volum of Pim, an me mads of taro Carty. INTEN 1 c IOp Gouty wiener Sul a Roads eel 0.0W. A OWNER 0. HAWLEY ENTERPRISES, INC AGGRESS PO BOX 1002 PHONE CRYISTATE/LP. ENUMCLAW. WA 88322 IVOLUME PAGE APPROVALS KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION I certify that all property taxes an paid and that a deposit has been made in sufficient amount to pay the taxes for the following year; that then an no delinquent special assessments certified to this office for collection; and that an special assessments on any of the property herein dedicated as streets, alleys, or for other public use aro paid In full. This day of . 20 King County Treasurer Deputy King County Treasurer KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved by the Department of Assessments this day of 20 King County Assessor Deputy Assessor Parcel Numbers) TUKWILA SHORT SUBDMSION COMMITTEE APPROVAL Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this day of 20 Chairperson, Short Subdivision Committee VICINITY MAP 13005 NE 126th N. WA 98034 TEL 425.823-5700 FAX 425.823-6700 DRAWN BY AWB DATE 10770010 JOB NUMBER 70080 CHECKED BY AYR) SCALE AS SHOIA / SHEET 1 oF 4 City of Tukwila OWputrnnt of Community Davalepnw4t 6300 8outllanter Boulevard, Tukola, WA 08188 Telpher* (208)4314870 FAX (208) 4314886 E+11all: lukolanaltukwilamAtia BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (OLD) PARCEL A: THE NORTH 90 FEET O< LOT 2, BLOCK 4, FIRST ADDITION TO ADAMS HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE N THE COUNTY OF KNG STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 4, FIRST ADDITION TO ADAM'S HOYE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED N VOLUME 12 OF PLAT5, PAGE 50. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE NORTH 90 FEET OF SAID LOT 2: AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 140 FEET (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SOUTH 152N3 STREET) Of SAID LOT 3: AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO TIE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY 8Y DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2014223. SITUATE IN TIE COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF LOT 29, BLOCK 4. FIRST ADDITION TO ADAM'S HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS. PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. LONG WESTERLY OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH. SITUATE N THE COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. TC1 IgGAL DESCRIPTIONS (NEW PARCEL 11 THAT PORTION OF LOTS 2, 3 AND 29. BLOCK 4. FIRST ADDITION TO ADAM'S HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED N VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED A5 FOLLOWS: COMMENDING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2: THENCE SOUTH 01'01'06' WEST ALONG THE EAST UNE THEREOF 66.50 FEET 10 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SND LOT 29; THENCE SOUTH 8805'42' EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 55.70 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKMU INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH 2007'08' NEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY HARON 47.88 FEET TO THE TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 85'10'57. WEST 284.81' TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF MIJTARY ROAD BEING A PONT ON A QURVE 11E CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 8314'24' EAST 1881.23 FEET DISTANT; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAI EASTERLY MARGIN AND SAID CURVE 101.68 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3115'48', TO 1110 NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH 140 FEET OF SAID LOT 3: THENCE SOUTH 8870'03 EAST 202.97 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWLA NTERNATONAI BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTH 2007'08' EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 135.28 FEET TO THE TRUE PONT Of BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2 THAT PORTION OF LOTS 2 AND 29, BLOCK 4, FIRST ADOITION TO ADAM'S HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING 10 THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2: THENCE SOUTH 0101'08' WEST ALONG THE EAST UNE THEREOF 66.50 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 291 THENCE SOUTH 8805'42 EAST ALONG THE NORTH UNE THEREOF 55.70 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MAR0N O TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTH 200708' REST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 47.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85'40'S7. WEST 264.84' TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF MDUTARY ROAD BEING A PONT ON A CURVE THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 8314'24' UST 1881.23 FEET DISTANT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN AND SAID CURVE 71.12 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2'09'58', THENCE NORTH 4'35'38' WEST CONIINRUNG ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 70.64 FEET TO THE NORTH LUNE OF SRO LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 8805'41' EAST ALONG SAID NORTH UNE 238.90 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. OMAffR(S). H AWLEY ENTERPRISER, INC ADDRESS: PO BOX 1002 mow ClIYI9TATFRIP ENIBACLAW. WA 96022. ./ DRAWN BY AWOL CHEMED 8Y *WO IVOLUME PAGE SURVEY NOTES EASEMENTS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE PLAT CERTIFICATE BY OLD REPUBLIC 111LE AND ESCROW, 090ER NO. 5226003174. DATED SEPTEMBER 2. 2010. AT 8:00 A.M. PRIMARY CONTROL POINTS AND ACCESSIBLE MONUMENT PO0ImN5 WERE FIELD MEASURED UTILIZING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (CPS) SURVEY TECHNIQUES USING LOCA SYSTEM 1200 EQUIPMENT. MONUMENT POSITRONS THAT WERE NOT DIRECTLY OBSERVED USING CPS SURVEY TECHNIQUES WERE TIED NTO iH1E CONTROL PON15 UTILIZING LEICA ELECTRONIC 1103 TOTAL STATIONS FCR THE MEASUREMENT OF BOTH ANGLES AND DISTANCES. THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-090. EVIDENCE O' OCCUPATION OF LAND (FOR EXAMPLE: FENCES STRUCTURES, PAVING GRAVELED SURFACES, ETC.) MAY NOT COINCIDE WITH THE DEEDED BOUNDARY UNES A5 SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. THERE ARE AREAS ON THIS SURVEY APPEARING TO HAVE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE DEEDED BOUNDARY LINES ARO CERTAIN EVIDENCE OF OCCUPATION. WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST AXIS RECOMMENDS THAT THE OWNER OR POTENTIAL PURCHASER CONSULT NTH LEGAL COUNSEL TO DETERMINE HOW BEST TO INTERPRET 1HOR PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ADDRESS ANY POTENTIAL BOUNDARY DISPUTES THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 AND CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED A5 INDICATING DE GENERAL CONDITIONS EXISTING AT THAT TIME. BUILDING LOCATION TIES ARE MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES (0R RADIAL) FROM THE PROPERTY UNE AT TIDE POSITIONS INDICATED. RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS S101114 ARE PER THE ASSESSOR'S YAP REFERENCES RECORD OF SURVEY BY CENIERPDINT UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20050725900010. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY (R1) SURVEY 108 3/4 'P A5 SHOWN ON THE MRUTAR1 ROAD GRADING AND GRAVE0NG PLAN BY THE KING COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE DATED AUGUST 18, 1930 AND THE THE ENGINEERS FIELD NOTES FROM THE MWITARY ROAD ESTABLISHMENT PACKET AS AVAILABLE ON THE KING COUNTY ROAD SERVICES MAP VAULT (82) THE KING COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE MAP FOR SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP 23N.. RANCE 4E., W.M. ACQUIRED FROM THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PLSO SURVEY RESEARCH WEBSTE RECORD OF SURVEY 8Y CRONES & A550CA1E5 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20000211900001, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY RECORD OF SURVEY BY NORTON DENNIS a ASSOCIATES UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8106239006, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY RECORD OF SURVEY BY LUND & ASSOCIATES UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7806159019. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY CITY OF SEATAC LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT N0. SU806-00001 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20070201-00009 RECORDS OF KNG COUNTY, WASHINGTON FIRST ADDITION TO ADAM'S HOPE TRACTS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 50. RECORDS Of KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP FOR THE NW 1/4 Of SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 23N., RANGE 4E., W.Y. DATE 1N27l2010 'SCALE A8 SHOWN NOV c. • Axis Survey A Mopping JOB NUMBER 10080 SHEET n 13005 NE 126th PE KIRK AID . WA 98034 TFL 425.823-5700 FAX 425.623-6700 OF 4 City of Tukwila Dspar4119R1 of Community Development 6300 9NNdh8Wller Boulevard, Tu8W14, WA 913185 Telephone (208) 4314670 FAX (206) 4314666 E�1WI: tukplandlitukvilla.ma.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 50 21 0 SO 1'=50. 100 pA1UM/BASIS OF BEARINGS BADS OF BEARINGS NO0'56'46 0 ALONG TEE %E5T UNE OF TEE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 22, T80. 230. ROE. 4E., W.M. vl 1M\';1 16 (715 21 21 IND TACK IN LEAD W Y03' CI)IC YON. DN. 0.75' W CASE (8/2009) FWD '4 IN BRASS 0150 IN CONCRETE MONUMENT W CASE DOWN 0.8' (8/2009) 22 758.92' S 144TH STREET (DIVISION) 587'35'15.0 FOUND REBAR AND CAP CRCNE5 2953r NORTH AND 1.2' WEST 1 OF PROPERTY CORNER 11830174 'W 230.00' NOTM UNE LOT 2 FOUND REBAR a CAP 'CRONES 29537' 0.2' FOUND 'K PARK W 2' NORTH AND 0.6' WEST BRASS DISC ON 3' 50. a 0d OF PARCEL CORNER CONCRETE MONUMENT IN 6.076'26' PAaa1L'A' CASE, 00661 0.8' I 1-10.94' 1PN 0041000404 (HELD FOR PONT OF 221.101 xi FT. TANGENCY 00 CENTERLINE) 10/27/20101^.. 1 41'0 2652.05' I FOUND REBAR AND CAP 'ORONE5 29537' 0.3' %NORTH AND 0.7' WEST OF PROPERTY CORNER 5.5.70 VOLUME PAGE MD PUNCH IN I/2 - BRASS PIN IN 4'X4 - CONCRETE NONUNENT W CASE, DONN 0.65' (8/2009) 3d PAIAIWC�BL'C 7.UNE0OV D • t0� 4 e / �Nc 2 01 NDyf •o o$ 1i g rPDNAp. 11. �' 'R,. PARCEL T a iPN 0041000485 7 R 333,os2 xi R. LOT LME 70 w s� ?��8 e All i MLL 1110 LOCATION OF NWTARY R0A0 WAS DETERMINED BY HOLDING ME MONUMENT FOUND AT ME POINT OF TANGENCY AS SHOWN HEREON. ME GEOMETRY A5 SHOWN ON THE MILITARY ROAD E5TABLEMENT DOCUMENTS (R2) WAS PROPORTIONED NNS ROTATED TO THE CALCULATED (R1) POSITION OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 5ECOOV 22. S 152ND ST (511103) ----3 ----- i� 000K76 sl - - 586T 202d 9 WEST LME BLOCK 4 PER PLAT 3 14d OWNER(S): HAWLEY ENTERPRISES. 900 ADDRESS: PO BOX 1032 Y'CV LV PHONE CITYISTATEMP: SAMCLAW. WA 08022 12.08' 50' 30• / 2844.37' 2® 1110 ME MONUMENTS DEFINING THE LOCATION OF 1UKWU INTERNATIONAL BLVD HAVE BEEN PAVED OYER OR DESTROYED. THE LOCATION OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY 500111 WAS CALCULATED USING ME RECORD OF SURVEY UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2005072590010. (RI) Axis Survey 6 Mapping 15 22 CALCULATED P0881 PER RI 13005 NE 126111 PL KI K AND. WA 88034 T12.425.823-5700 FAX 425923-6700 DRAWN BY ANA DATE 102712010 JOB NUMBER 10080 CHECKED BY AWG SCALE A8 SHOWN SHEET 3 OF 4 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 SouCroxlbr Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98163 Telephone (206)431-3670 FAX (206)1314666 E�NWI: WkdaMAWhwBawa.ue BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER GRAPHIC SCALE ( 1 1 1 30 15 0 30 1'=30' 60 GAM/BASIS OF BEARINGS BASS OF BEARINGS 1100'56'86'6 A10110 THE MST UNE OF THE NW QUARTER OF SECTOR 22. TRP. 23N. 50' LEGDID v V WATER UTE G G O GAS UNE ♦' P P POWER UNE f F FIBER OPTICS UNE CHAIN UNG( FENCE UNE 1 NORTH UNE SLED CORNER 0.2' NOR1N OF LOT 2 Ci PROPERLY UNE SHED CORNER 0.1' NORTH OF PROPERLY UNE 018995'41.19 REST ENO OF 5' CRAW 1.IN6 FENCE I5 0.4' SOUTH I OF PROPERTY UNE NE FENCE CORNER 150.3' S e 0.2' W OF PROPERTY CORNER 0081HEA3T CORNER LOT 2 (P06) 2 -STORY WOOo STRUCTURE NORTNWE5T• CORNER LOT 29 VOLUME PAGE 111 WESTERLY MARGIN MAMA INTERNATIONAL BOG sa SOWN FACE OF BULLRING 0.3' NORTH Of PROPERTY UNE SOUTH CORNER OF / CONRETE WALK 15 0.9' SOUTH OF PROPERTY UNE 30• 30' ,b. (*5169LY MAR49N MILITARY ROAD NORTH UNE OF 1HE SCUM MAO' OF LOT 3 30• 08 169(5): HAWLEY ENTERPRISES, WC ADDRESS: PO BOX 1002 PHONE: WY/STATE/3P: ENLa4CLAW. WA 96022 DRAWN BY AWWO CHECKED BY AWD DATE 10127/2010 SCALE AS SHOWN Axis Survey 8 Mapping 300 NUMBER 10060 SHEET 13005 NE 126th FL 1331.10.AND. WA 95034 TEL 425923-5700 FAX 425923-6700 4 4 <k ' , ,CaVAti*".44.14,614t [ tl 4$1 t :r , ' 4/ ' ..., . . ( .1116 Ikkr *. 7 il, II" .: • ' 1/. ... .. 1 r -141 [ 4. • VICINITY MAP kic5 1 \ 30' I z 0 (s1 u\ c,J co 31.19 O rn c\r'oth S0' -7 (- x 203.31' N 88"09'19” W CEDler D 10.44' OSITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" NORM `I, 0' 5' 10 20' 40' Attachment B 50' SITE NOTES: DE INFORMATION: E%ISTINC USE: 20IJE: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: OCCUPANCY GROUP: ALLOWABLE AREA ACTUAL BLDG. AREA: OVERALL SITE AREA BLDG SETBACKS: FLOOR AREA 04110 TRUDYS TAVERN REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) V8 4-2 QUICK -SERVE RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE THRU W1900W 6.000 5F (A-2. VB CONST.) 2,381 SF +/- 26.458 SF 1RO11 T: 20'; 2ND FRO110: 10'; 901 YARD: 10' 2,381 SF / 26.458 5F a 95 PARKING REQUIRED: PARKING PROVIDED: BLDG I BUILDING 1.919 5F USABLE AREA / 100 =38 STALLS 28 STALLS OCCUPANCY FLOOR AREA TOTAL AREA: 1ST FLOOR A2 TOTAL CONDITIONED AREA 2.381 SF 2.381 SF 2,381 5F 1-18-2011 12-21-10 REVISE PER AGENCY COMMENTS SUBMIT DESIGN REVIEW 6' BLACK CHACILLJK FENCE 22 HT UGHT POST 4414 2506 META. HALIDE LAMPS 6' 10511 CONCRETE 010311 OKE RACK 4' COJCREIE WALK RAISED TWINED ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE NEW CATCH BASIN, REFER TO GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAID 24' X 24' 1411J6D CONCRETE PLAZA =CRETE TABLES 6114 8011-0I BENCHES METAL CANbPY M URArNO PRIMARY WRY ASPHALT CONOEIE PAVEMENT UNDERGROUND GREASE 141100PTOR '® INTERNALLY ILLULCNA1m PREV0EW MDAI BOARD '® SPEAKER 600 MENU BOARD 4' STEEL BOLLARD WITH PAINT FINISH REMOVE EILST. CURBING PANTED ORECNOJAL ARROWS 020 E1051. 1RU0Y5 800 TO BE DEMOLISHER D5VE 11105"ENTRY 40J '® 100 HOT EJ11R' 401 '® 6' HT WIC. BLODI 1RASH EN009I1E 91141 MU WALLS Atm STEEL DOORS, PM/111D TO MATCH BULGING '® STEEL HEIGHT DETECTOR BAR D2 CONCRETE SLAB AT TRASH 010.0511IE 4' WOE PAINT 101E FIST. APPROACH TO REMAIN MARKS NUMBER OF STACKING IN ORM 1HRU LANE 185T. CONCRETE CURBING TO REMAIN 001511E 195T. CONCRETE CURBING TO REMAIN OFFSITE LOST. WATER METER TO 61 RELOCATED PROPOSED TACO TIME BUILDING 4' HT BLACK OI41110111 FENCE DATE REVISIONS Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Tukwila, WA \1JJ H.G. Kimura A11300 P6LC E"'". fir 741425 MIC M FIR 4152712333 111012 W. lab Den Mt OE R.e44 WA NMI DATE:12-21-10 JOB N0.10-2042 Al .1 NOTE VERIFY IDEJITIFICATIOI 5404! LOCAOOIS W11H OWNER PRIOR TO OJS1ALJh11041 111.00NA102 TACO TIME CACTUS 9041. PROVIDE 2-00X OE1010 SICK 6172-3-/A" ytk 10FY EXACT LOC. W/ 0%11 R. 201=2-34 )Y-9 1/q;13 17-01•0 14.1/_„41 JOINT UNE5 PA11100 STEEL CHANNEL ENTRY STRUCTURE REFER TO STRUCTURAL 0905 PREFIIBSHED METAL COWED TRIM PREFABRICATED AWNING UNIT BY AWT JG MIDFACTURER /8. 3 -COAT CEMENT PIASTER SYSTEM OVER LAYERS GRADE b• BURD:NG PAPER OVER /2• PLYWOOD SHEATHING FINAL COAT OVER CEMENT PLASTER SHALL BE AN ELASTOMERIC oRYNY 011091 COAT ADM VERT. J0;1JTS WITH AWNING AND PROVIDE CENTER JOINT AS SHOWN. CEMENT PLASTER VERT. JT. LINES ALINING MANUFACTURER TO PRONG= FLASi1JG FOR AWING SYSTEM. q��a�= au M8 II 1111111 1E111 3,-0. s 0.-0" NORTH ELEVATION 1/4•-1'-0• NOTE: 41:RIFY IDENIIFICAROI 9041 LOCAROJS WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION EQUAL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WI114 INSULATED GLASS 0=.40 INSTALL CEMENT PLASTER ON BAD( ACID SITES OF ENTRY TOWER EQUAL BRONZE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1• INSULATED CLASS U=.40 WITH TEMP. GLASS PER WINDOW SCHEDULE. 20'-2 3/0 J 7-9 1 /4 17-0. NN NN NN NN ma"Mfoctur•. cola number remarks H01E: AMP STEN ID MAILO (KEEN AWNING UMP SHADE SHALL BE STNIEE55 STEEL 0 STEEL CHANNEL OVER- HANG WALL SCONCE. EACH SIDE WEST ELEVATION WALL SCONCE LIGHT EACH 901E OF ENTRY DOCK, PROVIDE FLUSH ELEC 001 BEANO. EAST ELEVATION • 1 /4-=1'-0• 001E, 4IISFY IDENTIFICATION 9041 LOCATIONS WITH 0001ER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION fU BRONZE ALUMINUM FRAMED WINDOWS YAM INSULATED GLASS U= .40 REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE FOR WINDOWS REVD TO BE TEMPERED AWTIMI6.87DTH 01140E0 BY TWO MEAD METAL FLA9-19G AT TOP TOP OF STONE CAP 2 1/2" k 2 1/2' Y IT STONE CAP, COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY OWNER CULTURED STOW WAINSCOT 141111 MORTAR JOINTS EVER MORTAR BED OWR CATV. METAL LATH OVER 2-101ER5 GRADE IF BLDG PAPER OW0 PLY*000 BEAMING 0011RACTOR SHALL FOLLOW x417)1. 11001 NL RtUWG r(Tt ACTUAL MART. 0105EN BY OWNER. ABOVE SPECS ARE FOR A MITERED STONE SYSTEM PROMOW BY OWENS COMING. AVE, CULTURED STONE CHOSEN BY OVER MAY NOT HAVE MORTAR JOINTS me 14'-0 1 /2r1 3'0• e EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE mark description ma"Mfoctur•. cola number remarks E Y pplIed lbnstolled O URYNT: SANDBLAST FINISH BENJAMIN MOORE ME5A VERGE TAN AC -33 4DEWALLS GC GC ® ORYNT; SANDBLAST FINISH BENJAMIN MOJRE TAWNY ROY 2173-20 ENTRY SIOEWALL h BANDING CC GC O. ORYNT; SANDBLAST FINNISH BENJAMIN M00RE TARRYTOWN GREEN HC -134 ACCENT 13AN1)1140 OC GC OORYNT; SANDBLAST 941044 BENJAMIN MDONE TERRAPIN GREEN 2145-20 ACCENT BANDI40 GC CC 51 5T0140 FACADE ELDORADOt SIGNNE NANNNCKET STACKED STONE COLUMNS k CAPS GC GC M1 NE1AL ROOFING NU -RAV METAL HARTFORD GREEN - AWNINGS CAP A TRW GG GC • O 7 SOUTH ELEVATION /4-=,.-0- �4 1-14-10 RESPONSE TO D.R. COMMENTS 12-21-10 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL DATE REVISIONS Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Bhrd. Tukwila, WA \`U H.G. Kimura ArffN6q, PLLG GATAM1; nomeDemertne T.1423.70.4N1 Fe Ca7212N3 UMW. Lake Ds.OA SE AMIN, VG NI! DATE:12-21-10 JOB NO.10-2042 A3 14,16-M Nord' Eievation I/4o a I 1-0r West Elevation I/4M = I'-0" 111-11-11I KEW(OOsOIn WO MINIS 1•1•1/ SONO Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila, WA H.G. Kimura A5.d. RLC Im1. r o.rwc W.. Mm, 7A1, 11-14-2010 Joe 140.07-164: A3.1 EVER= RASH SCHEDULE rI /rMle ee1mllllre oft, molar nrY Cr" ® 0I110I Soda nM rvr roM Or IeQ t .M}n NOW tl 10 ® n1MM IIIIaNr IMM 1•11M•1 MOON UM Ma an-aI OM mA re e 0 arm MOW, MOM - MEI TAIM•001 TA,OM 102.11 MOIn 11MYe m tl 4 ORM MMCNIO1 nM =MN MOOT as Oo1 ee-.. MOOT IMOO x OD 4 Ma nca =Meat SOON MM..OX, n.N® ME came • Con a m ® MR& ZOOM WIT m -Ma • 1Mm Amo 1 i MOM NMI O ru- OMNIA M Mane OIL Mane Ss MIO O. NI 111-11-11I KEW(OOsOIn WO MINIS 1•1•1/ SONO Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila, WA H.G. Kimura A5.d. RLC Im1. r o.rwc W.. Mm, 7A1, 11-14-2010 Joe 140.07-164: A3.1 Z10 -67k 5outk Elevation I/4" e I '-0° East Elevation I /4o a I '-0" 1.e-2011 feelel AO= COMMA aevooaa [WM Peel Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila, WA H.G. Kimura 1.11a WM Al: u -u -me Xe NO.ol-saA A3.2 • ?LK) -mct 0 ti• se aFLpo. PLAN 1/4•-1'-0' NORTH 6103 REC1SREE7.11 A J;Nu ‘64.-LoY 12-21-10 SUBMIT DESIGN REVIEW DATE REVISIONS Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 H.G. Kimura Archtteek Ric IV CS MAW F•• 4252312383 WM W. IW Mae pA6 lines, WA 911236 DATE, 12-21-10 JOB T10.10-2042 A2.1 3-0' 38'-6' NAT. GAS ELEG CAB r O I 1 n f__o_ I D I ` JAN. T . . VEN-0 ,�,-1 _1- CJSTAIJTMSOOSr-FY ` N \ 4 \ CE / v, HOT WATER I / / I \ DINING 1--j O1 HEATER. VERIFY EXACT LOC. 1 1 1 I It A ,, 1 1 /1 L HALL UO / PT CH OBITER. Y L. L, \ \ =„"" ITYDA.E i �5 ® r 68 SEATS. _\ . +(:)_. -, - .�. I i-_-.).}.2t4D--, i T. / 3=1niM3- • PT `�`JCELS WI \s DRY STORAGEEE .lo . • I �I --J .A -W3--, �A LOW HEIGHT WALL 0 I I FOOD PREP. ,A.F.F. + 42' rTMP; . I , 4• •VIA I CUULLR 4 — rj I J_/ I/ I �A * P1� / l� --,t—� W3 . A -- -� HIGH CH�IRS f l -JT +34• A.F.F. L - O I 5/603155 511 WALL COMM i i FD . . . �e]�� ❑ AT TRAY SURFACE I] moi I 0101 4YB BA6ALF PER WC 5079 8D1PJD ME I H000 FRO,I TW CF BASF TO 80T. OF HOW ` 65GLL r CAB TYPE Y oval 1�'YR $810561 Yt'a ! r�1 �; {jI to TiA MENU WALL El GNS NW IF OFlA1 EYIERIOVER OR STUD5'151EY, - LJ1 k. 10 ABOVE I='� O,� --1 XT TO BOT. OF 806 CE0 1 -!ft WALL PER CA to 60. 1" 6X6 p\ITCHEN POST �®r 340 '� f I® -- .�I�-, T — - ENTRY _I_ 1 D 8.,.1,1.1 IX ( YI I•I• AFF - --J '' L�I ®SERVICE ® DRIVE-THRUilITO SERVICE (WA., I I I 1 : I I I]� _J ---, 0 J I i O OFFICE: L—JI - fel 11 ^1 I , aFLpo. PLAN 1/4•-1'-0' NORTH 6103 REC1SREE7.11 A J;Nu ‘64.-LoY 12-21-10 SUBMIT DESIGN REVIEW DATE REVISIONS Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 H.G. Kimura Archtteek Ric IV CS MAW F•• 4252312383 WM W. IW Mae pA6 lines, WA 911236 DATE, 12-21-10 JOB T10.10-2042 A2.1 r'Lv�v\f\VVV �\V =====1 II II II II II 01 / / / dac► t 00t k4.;. b' I+O. cig4 O I'�ittVe 11 �ai��0��,�1.0.�\ m�� • �- Q�'n�` (f6f©l)QC=�C1: �/ ��► `� 1. 11 tom' o, �,0\' / ©,.+r\\ liXfv! < °f= lei 0)0':ucko _ o!)cl©vivaq ell ionaf)cl`ornl+ -'rR c� 20111I 157 03,43, 4' 11 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ALIGNED WITH SURVEY 11•018714 L. I Pit -OSI \i'fk PLANT LIST symbol botanical/common name O EES `I Acer palmotum 'Sango Koku'/Coral—bark 1 Japanese Maple �' Acer rubrum Bowhall'/Bowholl Red Maple 19 0 W Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Cimmzam'/ 7 SH Pyrus calleryiona 'Glenn's Form'/ 6 Chanticleer Flowering Pear RUBS A Abelia grandiflora 'Edward Goucher'/ Edward Goucher Abelio Au Arbutus unedo Compacta'/Compact Strawberry—tree 8 Berberis verruculosa/Worty Barberry C Choysia ternota/Mexican—orange D Escallonio 'Newport Dwarf' E Euonymus alatus Compacto' C. Winged E. 9 O Festucga glouce Elijah Blue'/E.B. Fescue 34 01 Hebe Autumn Glory 30 M Mahonia aquifolium Compacta'/Compact Oregon—grope 47 N Nandina domestica 'Compacta'/Compact Heavenly—bamboo 25 ® Nossella tenuissima/Mexican Feather Grass37 O Osmanthus delavayi/Delavoy Osmanthus 29 P Prunus laurocerasus Mount Vernon ./ Mount Vernon Laurel GROUNDCOVER — plant in triangular pattern \\\\\\Arctostaphylos uva—ursi/Kinnikinnick Rubus rolfei (oka R. pentaloba)/ Creeping Rubus quont. size/root/spocing/remarks 52 5 37 5 31 1\" cal. min., B&B, specimen form 2" cal. min., 8&B, 20' o.c., clear trunk to 6' ht., full 2" col. min., B&8, 30' o.c., clear trunk to 6' ht., full 2" cal. min., B&B, space as shown, clear trunk to 6' ht., full 18" ht. min, 4' o.c., ful 18" ht. min, 4' 18" ht. min, 4' 18" ht. min, 4' 15" ht. min, 3' 18" ht. min, 4' 1 901. can mint 15 sp. min, 2 o.c., ful o.c., ful a.c., ful o.c., ful o.c., ful 2' o.c., o.c., ful full 15" ht. min, 3' o.c., full 15" ht. min, 3' o.c., full 1 gal. con min, 2' o.c., full 18 ht. min, 4 o.c., full 12 15" spt. min, 3' o.c., full 1,500 1 gal. can, 24" o.c. 360 4" pots, 18' o.c. NOTES 1. Meet all the requirements of the City of Tukwila. 2. It is the landscape contractors responsibilty to determine quantities. If discrepancy occurs between the plant list and the plan, the greater number shall be used. 3. An automatic irrigation system shall be designed ondinstalled with 100% coverage. Overwotering shall be avoided. Place the deduct water adjacent to the domestic water meter. The system shall include an automatic rain shut—off device. 4. In all planting areas, remove 18" of existing, soil under the demolished asphalt and replace with topsoil or 3—way mix in 5 lifts and compacted to 85%. Soil or soil mix to contain mycorrhizae strains. TREE STAKES TIES TREE WIRE OR 11E5 STAKING PLAN TYPICAL ALL PLANTS • PLANTING PIT TWO TIMES SIZE OF ROOT BALL •PRUNE ALL DISEASED AND BROKEN BRANCHES • PLANTING SOIL MIX TO BE 2/3 TOPSOIL, 1/3 ORGANIC MATTER • ESTABUSH 3' DIAMETER TREE AND SHRUB BASINS IN BEDS FOR ALL TREES 1/2" BLACK HOSE W/ 2 STRAND 12GA 515TED WIRE OR CHAINLOCK TREE 11E5 3-2-X2"X8'—O" STAKES SECURELY DRIVEN INTO GROUND 2" MULCH IN BASINS & BEDS NIC I ' L�`11.— moi._ I TREES TYPICAL NOT TO SCALE COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL MIX 9" TAMPED PLANTING SOIL MIX UNGLAZED PLANT PIT SURFACE SHRUBS PLANTING DETAILS orrx or wookrool m WOS[Aer metwor r HERMINA EHRLICH a:s 405 . .les L1>'r5 N/11/12 HERMINA EHRLICH DESIGNS landscape architecture & site planning 713 north 73 street cattle.98103 Ph: 206-784-8604 Fei 206-789-6855 C: 206-999-1537 Email: hedesignsemsn.com m 1-19-11 delete Military Rd. sign to 1-13-11 odd plant list symbols, bike rock & south fence DATE REVISIONS Taco Time Restaurant NNWC 152nd & Tukwila International Bhrd. Tukwila, WA H.G. Kimura Ardllteat, Ila eau. Cgranne veeelast maNs1r!®e For 45271285 r12 W.I..OW* R88 __LWA rat. DATE: 12-21-10 JOB N0.10-2042 L1.1 e N SCALE: 1" = 50' 0 25 50 1CD SHEET INDEX 2 3 CV -O 1 EC -01 PU-O 1 COVER SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN LEGEND BLUELINE PROPOSED FEATURES A5 N07ED -'o BOUNDARY Ell ASPHALT PAW_NENT 9DET4'AU' R.., CIF WAY LOT UNE 17-5 FLOW & CURB I - CENTER LINE 5A r:C✓T EA5EMEN! ' 8U204G 700778/NT - BUILDING OVERHANG WILDING 900/7)NE - B✓'LANG SETBACK (8080) PROPOSED UTILITIES CATCH 84021. T}PE / 5075 20/0 CUL VERr ENO STORM CLEANOUT YARD DRAIN 570P7 DRAIN PIPE • -� -.- 9/RFAGE FLOW 4 SEVIER SERVICE T RPE FLOW • • 0605.8 QEANp/r 5- WATER METER EXISTING FEATURES 55(10 0. 7E ADJACENT PLA 7/PARCEL UNE 0 AD./AGENT RCHT-Or-WA //LOT FIRE HYDRANT 94770 657£9 0.47E VALVE WA TER MA.4NOLE POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR STREET USW Pos£R VAULT TRANSFORMER POWER IIETER GAS METER GAS VAL1£ SIGN ASPHALT CD4wsETE - CENTERLINE W -- - EASEMENT SURFACE FEA NRE5 LTV, 70' CONTOURS -0- 2' CDNT0/123 - - - -FC - 57097 DRAIN PIPE - - - -SS - SE7.£R MAIN ----U -WATER MAIN © ----OHP- AERIAL POKER LINE -- - -P - 8✓/2ED PO'AZR LINE O ----G- CAS MA:,4 PI - - - -FO - B✓RED FIBER OPTIC CABLE ---- -WIRE PENCE M ----0- CHAll)LINK FENCE 7 - -- - 0 - BOARD FENCE RElA:N.'NC HALL J1 ❑ CATCH BASO, TYPE I ■ A� CATCH 8A0N, TYPE D L> SD PPE now IN • YARD ORAN o STOW CLEANOUT OSEWER 7AN'HOLE 5_F13£37 QEMOUT D SS PIPE now -Mck 21 SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC 22, TWP 23N, RGE 4E, W.M. TUKW/LA TACO TIME FNa_320/10/ LFAQ 55'5055. ON a750, CAS. (6/2009) END '+' l4 3' ORA DISC W DUE MON, ON 0.8" /5 CASE (8/2009) FOUND k' MARK 11J 2' 84455 0155 09 3 50. CONCRETE MONUL!EN/ IN CASE 004N a8' (HELD 008 PONT OF raNa£' IICY GF CEN 7F97/n•E) 10/27/29/0 S 144TH ST 50055157 2,652.05' FOUND 'E001/34N0 CAP RENEE 2953? - a 1' NORTH AND 1.2" 11E5! OF PROPERTY CORNER s4>x �2sasQ 50UN0 REBFR AN0 CAP `f]iRl't5T29517"-T 0.3•NORM ANO 07' WEST 'OF PROPERTY CORNER E 1 -STORY C07407E7E 5791/C70:R- NEW PARCEL 2 132,743 SF 3.502' FDUND7 Rr96ghf/ '0405 29537' 0.2'003181 2,20 0.6' BEST CF PMO). C<MNLN 1 11-5z395t'(P1 �11� :5514' SB8'IOOSF 2,61:.3.-' - --_ - y-- --- - 5 152ND ST ENO PUNCH IN lt2. 71H955 191 /5 404 CONE -P54.5 ON 565'44 CASE. (8/2009) 54061/74170 7097%014 PER 97 22 VICINITY MAP NOT i0 SCALE PROJECT TEAM OWNER FROM ENGINEER CIVIL ENGINEER THE BLUELINE CROUP 25/75/4171457/479.8!5400 KIRKLAND, WA 9803) (425) 216-4051 9225 CONTACT. GEOFF E. r419815 PE ARCHITECT SURVEYOR /05 1401URA ARd07ECT. PLLC 18012 W LAKE D£9REOR 55 RENTON,, WA 08056 (425) 766-5000 SITE DATA 4X15 Sl/R1£Y AND MAPRNC 7,1005 NE 125TH PL ICUt9LAND, WA 98034 (425) 623-5700 CONTACT ALLEN W O0ISSOM,, PLS 97E ADDRESS- 05312 752.0 tr N5IY.IA INTERNA RONAL BLVD TOTAL SITE AREA: 54655 55 NEW PARCEL 1 AREA : 9E7E45E0 /202E8110115' LOT IMPERVIOUS CO'/ERAGE NEW PARCEL 2 AREA: REPLACED /77549005 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: TOTAL INPERY,OUS LOT PARERr70'✓5 5016703 £ 2050 5F 20,620 SF 77 70 ; 2.1435! 697 S' 27.792 SF 25,489 5F 91.70/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A. THE .0477/ DO FEET OF LOT 2, BLOC; 4, 22S1- 4007CON 7O ADAMS HONE TRACTS ACCORO•NG TO THE PLA! THEREOF RECORDED 1N Y (0745 12 OF PUTS PACE 50, RECO905 DF X(140 COUNTY. WASH4G704 9TUA lE W M£ COLINTT OF RING, STA7E OF WASRAN57ON PARCEL 8: LOIS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 4. FIRST ADDITION TO ADAM'S HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO NE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED W VOLU.51 12 of FU TS PAGE 50 RECORDS OF 1056 600Jr< WASHINGTON. EXCEPT THE NORTH 90 FEET OF SAID Lor 2. AND EXCEPT 711E SOUTH 140 FEET' (MEASURED Ar RIGHT ANGLES TO SOUTH 752.0 5IR£E7) CF SART LOT 3; ANO EXCEPT TNA r 709859 CONVEYED TO THE STA TE OF w4901457014 FD? HTGHW3Y BY DEED RECORDED UNDER 055000NG NO. 2014221 SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING STATE OF W4010,5GTO4 PARCEL G TNA r PO4n0N OF Lor 20. 8LGCX 4. FIRST AODI0ON 70 ADAMS HOME TRACTS ACCORONG 70 THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED 1N VOLUME 12 Of PLATS. PAGE 50, RECORDS CF XING CVIINTY WASHINGTON, LY„4G 455T£RLY OF AMEX HIGHNAY 00(17H. 9104 7( /,4 711E COUNTY Of KING 07A 7F Of WASHINGTON BASIS OF BEARING 8495 CP BEARING N00'S6'4670 ALONG 0//5 WEST LINE OF THE MY QUARTER Of SECTION 22. 747'. 234. RGE. 4E., W.M. DATUM VERTICAL OA NM MA VO 88 7700//708/50 DA FUN: NAD 83/91 itt BENCH MARK IBM A' SET NAG NAIL IN ASPHALT AT NE CORNER KEY BANK PARKING L01, (SE CORNER OF SITE) 12' SW OF GREEN 0109/r 574404129 AND 7' SOUR, OF FACE OF EXTRUDED CURB WTERSECTION W770 BACK OF WALK EL£VA ROV. 287.00' 787 8' SE7 MAC NAIL AND 54194ER 'AXIS CONTROL" IN ASPHAL T A7 NE CORNER OF SITE ELEYA DON. 33262' APPROXIMATE CUT/FILL CUT' 300 CY FILL: 0 CY UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN 711E APPROX7MATE LOCATION. THERE IS 7/0 GUARANTEE 7HAT ALL UTILITY LINES ARE SHOWN, OR THA r THE LOCATION SIZE AND MATERIAL IS ACCURATE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNCOVER ALL INDICATED PIPING WHERE CROSSING. INTERFERENCES. OR CONNECTIONS OCCUR PRIOR 7O TRENCHING OR EXCAVATION FOR ANY PIPE OR STRUCTURES 70 DETERMINE ACTUAL LOCATIONS SIZE AND MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE APPROPRIATE PROVISION FOR PROTECTION OF SAID FACILITIES. Rif CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 121NESALL.AT 7-800-424-5555 AND ARRANGE FOR FIELD LOCATION OF EXISTING FACIUTIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. I �nn BLUELINE SCALE: A5 N07ED PROcCT 41::AG.a: GEO'F E 1.47BLE PE PPQ✓ECF 51:57:£07: GEOFF E 73778(E, PE OES'CTER: DOM/NOUE 04845009 55(10 0. 7E 1/79/2011 71 2 0 77 W 2 g e 0 0 F i1 I COVER SHEET TUKWILA TACO TIME RETAURANT BUILDING NNWC 152ND & TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON E. 7 0;:05 A CS ` 422 rte//c: /..! 53 P srca;;a '0-17.17C. a/o/200 JOB NUMBER: 10-080 BHEE'I NAME: CV -0 1 HMT 1 OF 3 0 2055 D¢ CI :9 SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC 22, TWP 23N, RGE 4E, W.M. I¢o Fc CF FGS _0'; C/ ;'-7,9 :.EA ‘I, _ • Y� 534 jT-_ _- 8''500s521) 6 LalC 3i 4 5 1 f` Lr,' "r -r-'r/r -r Vc-nrsx....::(EL. , t:5E) r � -A s �i�47'x' 1239.90 l-�_ - --55-n ss. �--- -✓ G 4 'r, { 11 - {i ry cRa /ts 003, Ii ✓ 03 0 7/4400.,"8.53; I + 1 if 1i jti. ;. OF ROVE EOR:: A /,'�+ �. U R 11 y " I {I I" m II I. G 11 11I. �W ✓ }#1i Ir. 1 !.j h Zn 1 I SII G > G GI`� 1\ ' ' 11 i..' .j• . • 1 11 {I NiFro 0 1;11 J' 155. 1 1 1 1i 1 I ii 1 1 I Ifl I1. 1 1 I 1 .99E4039,27_ COc..qu: a- 177 ' H,Ntv,r 7455 0' 5 O SD CO YR' 14 CAS 004-74 (/75.0 ra9 47470' L.C/ G'CE 452.94E) ,0/22/20,0 A.H 47,146 /4 5)2.76 8" /_ 528 , (N, 5/ (CENTER G•t.4rtR'_/) 5'PVC 329.4 (E) V D. /£ 3333 (3:1 (AIN •7/119749 *J .DC 5019&4 ,177y F iri'E4 555).4 434,5 kW 33749 8" if 2294 (x, 5) (LT.57172 CH.9735E3) EY 1-5534/' 50.459275 57,55709E C6 LT_/.75 • I-7092' 155) f2 COY f 33.< 1'I51 G3r4C 12 332.2 a COY f 4/(515 S s -+SS---_aj. 519! ----- ;2- - C9 015 '531.3 (5)' E( A5'aH.f" 5^`.00L4405 V � la rn r2' CO•3C0 330.3 (l.) 12'505/545 3,515 75) POLE GFRAVS4C4994EP TO RELC'A7E0 E9 5.1W (50(50 U4;/T 33) 706E 9(1OCA /ED EX 525)4'4!" 1ID BF 6515349 :431.3.14 J9 ' . e•%,>sa? (C 9) (a,,,/s6721A,471EL?ED .. • 93.9939G R :EF+) Cl/RB Fi0 0£ 62/50,0 • IO B(5)7/) .13 (TM) CB 0.55 'OR 333=.40 6- GONG :_ 330.6 (2) 70 GE REuO'vfD e 6702` 40,5 STRUCT09' NO45 4.: i.7 REP0R;'OR 31,93E-5 't P OR N7 ��i.. r598V5� Tc ` J CAP 11• R PARI:YL I i I{ 0 .. oosv I! 9 1 SII -L_ .-575.41' 1/5701 5 r/PJC 9' 7O BE REMOVED - m M ,214 153 V1r B0Or: ' 953984.£ TO C,GE-G5 70 BE 4/740„40 TO BE RFJ 01:5 CB 974:3 Tay 33,.99 1 C0VC)5 329.: (E) 4 ID BE 44/5060 , (0_9,;57 0051' TD 6E FEM�VEO "•_. £i, 4.404 MEI5R i0 BE RELOCATED 49'0/OR REPLACED C6-341 TOP 33529 8' PVC if 3326 e' A09 .E 332.7 (E! )0QERf4'O450 s i/ / CO r^0.366 •3466 59 PIG. IE S.i+(E) '\ . 53!°80 FA .. ..11...o.,.71.63 -e'15 . _ 202.97 `.." 4 //'00?/5 730: ()90'/51'75N53/5b_S --J i,9 _ y_ ( .!..- '''1 Lu�, J , .. O I �[y S�,nr ' 12" 60.74 /2 350? (45 9(, 7036 SI,M 1 . 32' 455'43299(f) G, 1 P3., ,. t1 I f6 o,. COL' -2d TO' 33536 12' LONG 15 350.0 (7 2) •2-507/5 r£ 529.9 (5) `. CO 3"135 ID0 334.96 6. 40.5 /_ 329.9 (..•1 9' CO':C )E 329.7 () o CB 4.723- ,? 335 S) ).'D: /_ 332.1 ('1) 1 ?'0':E332.0(„J e'4.3Sa 332.3(//( `°� 1.. ^� 0_22 /('' 225 ,79).9ES Fa4TII4 / . \ 70 245 f� :2> 0. ,E 2 I� • :2.0:7E329.'(S 12"_M 1E 329.: (Sf B"ADS 1. .329.'�) q UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN INE APPROXIMATE LOCATION. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT ALL UIlUTY LINES ARE SHOWN, OR THAT THE LOCA770N, SIZE AND MATERIAL IS ACCURATE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNCOVER ALL INDICATED PIPING WHERE CROSSING, INTERFERENCES OR CONNECTIONS OCCUR PRIOR TO TRENCHING OR EXCAVATION FOR ANY PIPE OR STRUCTURES TO DETERMINE ACTUAL LOCATIONS SIZE AND MATER/AL 771E CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE 7HE APPROPRIATE PROVISION FOR PROTECTION OF SAID FACILITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DNE CAU, AT I-800-424-5555 AND ARRANGE FOR FIELD LOCATION OF EXISTING FAC7U77ES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. '6L BLUELINE 554LE, 45 NOTED PRD,F3C1 6/915.'/ 654: CEOF5 E ;AMBLE PE PROJECT 51..C,:55P: GEOFF E ;AMBLE, PE 055'3. 517: 0049)5034 GABALDON ',55 -DE D.155: 1/14/2017 O W 6 N O EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN TUKWILA TACO TIME RETAURANT BUILDING NNWC 152ND & TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL. BLVD CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON', 1i; �T 1, 0• 5)i A Aa %i/ Oe ,'c, al/19/20 JOB NUMBER: 1 0-080 • EJC -O 1 BM'T A7 r I� L1 t4 »:R 4•.5 5 1'1,K .':/_5 2953 5555575117145;9£81 it 1 l it/y 0 /6 JJJ (10 111,74,20aN 17.11C0 SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC 22, TWP 23N, RGE 4E, W.M. 5_5,711747.- - H'At 4.X14, •9 Corr 1 33! E (,o) CEN l72 0)497 1 4 !N 1;•FA B ,E 44';411.7 r•T -t /) I • " I 5959//5 332.4 (5 53 1- -T _T _. / ,I Od4.:'HfU >•J!'1�=+`Y� 1 / N8BYL5',�1u ..f:F.-- - _ _- 3, s' 5,7458 /945 0 3 - So. 4a':C✓E4E 0- - V. 1r, CASE. 0041108 01510 ,OR pow! or /4,0E740' OF CP./F.51/NQ 10/27/2010 55/11 C/,5 47!44 . 52..-6 r- .0 (1., .5 ) (CENTER'1245441`! ) 85 /15 429.4 (5) 5 r"fg7/113;-'14 12" T.31.: '.) 129 CO'50.E J33' : 55) • EY 1 97057 5a'!CR5)5 57!UC: U.2 1--' `f7-.1'.-1 ;f I'' tli 2 ti i: -.-i II "'-F0 0814'5 {X 1 I . II 111 Ili r i l( Y 7I L // .tel 11� / J ! {, / _ Iii71 .11,1:. ---G---_G-.-__G,..--.--,-.6 •G -"'....I ^t -- 44-t SS --- -GG-_ F -- .124 C011C_' 33:.3 (5' : 05050555• ), J' ,2'•CONGi£551.3 (5) ... SANrr7RY S£KER 55/5 ..•158 T.AS nC ! U+ER) 010.3, /000 57RUC VR_ e>Q. 95F r n F .t AEPMT FOR ✓. •TIES` ,• f�rRF i 11,0443! M• n 553.5'7148 4 54 • 0.1 81 I t 471 39(5. It 0._ 501117).15, 0.4' ' 555,144 74riS;C!, . CORNER • AT C2 4(6 46 :`.0° 334 66 8 P tom.50.'(E) i(P 135128 I,T i 8.4 L5 3328 (5) (: j •• 89 i0500 !C 342.8 (F) • NOV K;17D76klrR 14,. ,fl"1A1LIC r SER0 4/-E /0033533 71/ ,_ 0r 1! --2.1 (.5)1.0 1 432.0 (9ADS if 5.52.3 (4' v! .9 A. mQ4. S b. O� ^� p Ti 49 ,s9 T o. rr-)0. 4 \ y, .'L 17.E 7�0@ .LII` 6,m,!•1 v 0 P. 2" `v2 2 12" 0: `529.715.1 a' ADC 4(229. (55 /'4 89 ADS 1'9.'(/) SII PROPOSED CB TrP.L' •CX CONTROL STRUCTURE' PROPOSED TACO .11, TIME BUILDING 8)844 WATER 08(7 84 TER 8"iC524 4 (a• 5) -L;:':TER 0/35!£)) voedi ';-2 COrC 33030.: (h). caw /E 0 t3) q1' , EYSG, l F' 1 moi../� �I CB / 1S8B70b3'f' , 20297 CAP EXITING' 4435_. IyPI • STOREUNAT. 5 PRa6fRTY E 58 42128 70^ 33538 12• COY!, 15 530 0 (a) /2"5012C ,.1" 529.9 (5) -• CB 37136 7[15)3.90 6" C0'.'C /E 329.9 On 8.40•:4 1£ 329.: (E) 15/ STOCM£1L TER c.1117417 TOP 5)219 12' C045 /5330 i(41 7 40 15 3_599 j.). 67 UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTE UNDERGROUND U71U71ES ARE SHOWN IN ME APPROXIMATE LOCATION. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE 7)845 ALL I/77117Y LINES ARE SHOW OR TWAT THE LOCA770N, SIZE AND MATERIAL 15 ACCURA75.. THE CON7RACTOR SHALL UNCOVER ALL INDICATED PIPING WHERE CROSSING. INTERFERENCES OR CONNECTIONS OCCUR PRIOR 70 TRENCHING OR EXCAVATION FOR ANY PIPE OR STRUCTURES TO DETERMINE ACTUAL LOCATIONS SIZE AND MA IERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE APPROPRIATE PROVISION FOR PROTECTION OF SAID FACILITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ONE CALL AT 7-800-424-5555 AND ARRANGE FOR FIELD LOCATION OF EXISTING FACTURES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. 1 1• /1/3 n ..n BLUELINE r SCALE: AS NOTED PRO,.ECT ,4"..A CEP: 5£OfF E TANGLE PE PROJECT E I:G :EER. EEVFP E TALIELE. PE OE5'G'IER DOM.NO05 CABA)009 - ISSUE D37E. 1/19/20)1 i 2 t, e 1 2 z 0 ma it'a nl n I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN TUKWILA TACO TIME RETAURANT BUILDING NNWC 152ND & TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON i ns j i E,: -A QC / o 0l/l9/Zoll .408 NUMBEN: 10-080 PU-O 1 13NT 3 OF 3 II II II II PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN i 11 ,IJ LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol Label COI Celalog Number Dtrplpeon Lamp File Lumens LLF Wath El P1 3 AVAF-250MH AVALUME M3250WM75PS AVAF26M.I S 27000 0.75 2g6 O O P2 1 AVAf,250MH AVALUAE M3250WM75(PS AVAF25M.lea 22000 0.75 500 o O.O P9 2 AVA-3450PSMH AVALUME MS250WM751PS AVA475M.ir 22000 0.75 585 1110 -CSti SCALE: 1" = 20'-0' 0. 5' 10' 20' 40' STATISTICS Deeaiptlm Symbol Avg Max Min MaxMN AvgRWn Ciao Zona M + 4.2t 122 10 0.410 30.6:1 10.5:1 NOTES 1. Lea lou talon leveed, heal values vall be riper. 2. Luminaire mauling Weld le 2511 above grads. 3. W 400toa dle anus values m 0.6k,1.011, & 5.010 1 IABOSSEM tN0 LLI..C.C. @ MECHANICAL -e ply, -Aim -era aQp PBOlE11�f L• 2100 /12tH AM NE 40010 0. WA 98006 Mat (420 402-4461 12-21-10 SUBMIT DESIGN REVIEW DATE REVISIONS Taco Time Restaurant 15037 Tukwila International Bhrd. Tukwila, WA Irt H.G. Kimura Artaeect PLLC SAMA' eyen....neerel rr625.200. ra 41e2lt2503 110020. 1A• Oar.Ota6 itrax,eA ems DATE: 12-21-10 JOB 140.10-2042 El