Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2018-02-12 Item 3F - Public Safety Plan - Fire Station 51 Schematic DesignCOUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Meeting Date I Prepared by Mayors rev ew Council review 02/12/18 RB i' ,t la/1 ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑ Other Mtg Date CATEGORY /1 Discussion Mtg Date SPONSOR Council HR ❑DCD Finance ❑.Fire TS ❑P&R ❑Police ❑PIF Court ►IMayor SPONSOR'S Staff is seeking Council consensus to move Fire Station 51 to the Design Development SUMMARY Phase. REVIEWED BY ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. ❑ CDN Comm n Finance Comm. E Trans &Infrastructure ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. DATE: 2/5/18 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY ►1 Public Safety Comm. ITEM INFORMATION ITEM NO. 3.F. STAFF SPONSOR: RACHEL BIANCHI ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 02/12/18 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Fire Station Schematic Design and Budget Estimate Update 2/12/18 ❑ Motion Mtg Date ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mtg Date ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑ Other Mtg Date CATEGORY /1 Discussion Mtg Date SPONSOR Council HR ❑DCD Finance ❑.Fire TS ❑P&R ❑Police ❑PIF Court ►IMayor SPONSOR'S Staff is seeking Council consensus to move Fire Station 51 to the Design Development SUMMARY Phase. REVIEWED BY ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. ❑ CDN Comm n Finance Comm. E Trans &Infrastructure ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. DATE: 2/5/18 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY ►1 Public Safety Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONsoR/ADMIN. CoMMrrrEE Mayor's Office No recommendation; Forward to 2/12/18 C.O.W. for consideration COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $ $ $000 Fund Source: PUBLIC SAFETY BONDS Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 2/12/18 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 2/12/18 Informational Memorandum dated 1/30/18, with attachments (updated after PS Com.) Minutes from the Public Safety Committee meeting of 2/5/18 111 112 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Rachel Bianchi CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: January 30, 2018 SUBJECT: Fire Station 51 Schematic Design and Updated Fire Station Budget ISSUE The City has completed Schematic Design on Fire Station 51. As the Council's Program Management Quality Assurance (PMQA) Consultant has indicated, the end of Schematic Design provides the owner with the first "real" budget number for the project. Even with value engineering, rejecting some program elements and critically reviewing the schematic design, costs for the fire station projects have increased since the last budget was shared with the Council in May of 2016. However, staff continues to recommend moving forward to the next stage, design development. BACKGROUND After the passage of the voter -approved Public Safety Bond in November of 2016, the City initiated the fire stations projects. Because the site for Fire Station 51 was previously determined, the City began design on this station immediately while doing the necessary analysis to determine potential locations for the other two stations, 52 and 54. The fire stations have gone through the programming stage to determine the critical needs of the building, necessary adjacencies and equipment to be housed in the facility. At the end of the programming phase, an updated budget was shared with the Council that estimated an $8.4 million gap between the Public Safety Bond and what was thought to be the overall budget for all three fire stations. After programming, Lydig Construction was brought on board to serve as the project's General Contractor/Construction Manager (GC/CM). Having a GC/CM early on allows the project team to have well-informed, real-time access to project estimators, updated costs of materials and a better overall understanding of the costs associated with construction. Additionally, now that sites for the other two stations have been determined, the City has much-needed information including budget impacts associated with site conditions. During the schematic design phase some of the programming square footage for Fire Station 51 grew, making the building approximately 1,500 square feet larger than contemplated in the programming phase. There are three key reasons for this growth in square footage: • Both apparatus bays able to accommodate the ladder truck — while only one bay is needed to be large enough to accommodate the ladder truck, the geometry of the building makes it more functional to have both bays the same length. There would be minimal financial savings from shortening one of the bays, which would create more corners, which are costly. • Planning for future growth — one of the key design principles of this effort was to plan the station in a way that could be expanded in the future, which is accomplished by identifying where the third bay and additional bunks and restrooms would be constructed. However, this also meant future -proofing some of the other spaces, such as gear storage, etc. for future growth as their locations in the building would not allow for future growth. 113 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 • Inclusion of air locks — another key principle of the design effort was to prioritize firefighter safety throughout the building and focusing on clearly separating the "hot, or contaminated" and "cold, or uncontaminated" areas of the building. This was accomplished in schematic design with air locks that go between the living quarters and apparatus bays, but they also required additional square footage not included in the programming effort. With schematic design complete, two separate cost estimating efforts for Fire Station 51 occurred, one under the direction of the City's architects at Weinstein A+U and one through Lydig Construction. This is standard practice to arrive at a final cost estimate for schematic design and the two estimates are reconciled to the satisfaction of all parties. The estimators then took the costs identified for Fire Station 51 and applied them to Fire Stations 52 and 54, based on square footage, as well as what is known about the specific sites. Market conditions cost escalation was also included for Fire Stations 52 and 54. Both Fire Stations 52 and 54 sites have potentially challenging site conditions and therefore the budget is carrying higher development costs for those sites than for Fire Station 51. The initial cost estimate for all three fire stations came in at more than $20.4 million above the budget identified in the Public Safety Bond. The program management consultant, design team and GC/CM initiated a value engineering effort to reduce costs and found an additional $400,000 in savings on the Fire Station 51 project. It is expected that when Fire Stations 52 and 54 get to the end of their schematic design phases there would be additional value engineering efforts associated with both of those buildings. In addition, the design team looked at what a minimal station design (with the smallest footprint possible, with the current program elements) would look like for Fire Station 51 and what the potential cost savings would be should the City chose to scale down accordingly. However, the minimal station design saved less than $500,000 in construction costs and included two detrimental flaws: • No ability to expand the building, conflicting with one of the major design principles of the overall program • Unacceptable operational deficiencies, including a lack of area for firefighters to drill on the site Because of the relatively small savings associated with the minimal station design and the significant unacceptable tradeoffs, the entire project team endorses moving forward to design development with the original design of Fire Station 51. This original design does not include some of the alternates identified early on, such as the roof extension for the future build out, on- site fueling or the additional parking spaces. The City chose to use the GC/CM method of delivery because it provides us with better certainty throughout the project. Lydig has a strong track record of accurate schematic design estimates, historically coming in at one to three percent of the final construction budget. Had the City gone the traditional design bid build method, the budget realities would not surface until construction bids were in, leaving the City with little time to determine a course of action moving forward. The entire project team understands the gravity of the $20.4 million gap between what was in the voter -approved Public Safety Bond and the current cost estimates for the three fire stations. It is also understood that this does not reflect the gap in the other equally important Public Safety Plan projects and that difficult decisions will need to be made. The City Council Finance Committee is analyzing alternatives to closing the Public Safety Plan funding gap and will be 1 1 4 Z:\Council Agenda Items4CommunicatlonslFinal PS memo 025181 Updated.doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 providing recommendations to the full Council for deliberation and determination later this spring. At the Public Safety Committee on February 5, 2018 members asked that the following issues be e addressed prior to the item m going to the Committee of the Whole for discussion • Question: How much larger is the apparatus bay for the ladder truck versus what is needed for an engine? The additional sauare feet to size both apparatus bays enough for a ladder truck is 621 square feet. Total square feet of the apparatus bays are 3,501. • Provide a listing of the alternates that were priced but not included in the base price of the three fire stations. • Hi hliaht the costs that are dependent on one another. See updated budget attachment. All items highlighted in yellow are directly affected by the cost of the building construction and increase or decrease depending on actual construction cost. • Include a table with the s uare footage for all of the rooms and uses in the pIans for Fire Station 51. • Confirm the generator remains in the program and base price. The proiect team has confirmed that the generator remains in the base price for the building and will have a 72 -hour run capability. • Provide the total cost of the fuel fill station. including enclosure. required roof structure, etc. Total cost for on-site fuel filling station $277,000. RECOMMENDATION Staff is seeking committee approval to forward this issue to the February 12, 2018 Committee of the Whole meeting for consensus that the City continue into the Design Development phase for Fire Station 51. Despite the budget challenges, the need for modern, safe fire stations remains very real, for the broader community and for the fire fighters that work in these facilities. Staff recommends moving forward with Fire Station 51 while the Finance Committee continues its work to identify strategies for closing the financial gap on the Public Safety Plan. The Council will continue to have multiple decision points in the future that provide "off ramps" if so desired. ATTACHMENT Fire Station 51 design Fire Station 51 site plan Updated fire station budget — updated from Public Safety meeting Public Safety Plan schedule Alternates priced but not included in base price Sauare footage table Z:\Council Agenda Items\Communications\Final PS memo 025181 Updated.doc 115 116 7-0 3/4" 20'-71 /4" 165'-8 3/4" OVERALL 16-11 1/2" 44'-91 /2" 103'-11 1/2" ALTERNATE 2: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR DESCRIPTION OF BASE BID ALTERNATE 7: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR DESCRIPTION OF DEDUCTIVE ALT L LINE OF ROOF ABV 11 1/4' M 0 ALTERNATE 6 (1) BOLLAR I( LINE OF F ENCLOSURE BRACE FRAME _33____1 ACK STOR BY OWNER oFD STOR 138 HOSE RACK (F010) 1 CASCADE FILL STATION (FOIC) CORRIDOR 135 O m M ▪ Nv 14'-1 1/2" 5'-9" 14'-1 1/2" ISCBA 137 1 GBOARD ON WALL FOR SCBA PARTS 1 LA ARCHITECTURAL SCREEN— ALTERNATE 1: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR DESCRIPTION OF BASE BID P WORK SHOP BENC 134 EMS 132 CORRIDOR 131 TRENCH DRAIN ►i- SEE MECH PROVIDE STR PING AT APP BAY. LINE LOC O IONS TO BE MARKED 0 SITE W/ TFD III r❑ --T 7 BRACE FRAME, TYP_; SEE STRUCT 1 DECON 126 FD 0 AIRLOCK DECON oFD WASH 124 WC U 125 °FD n� COMM 127 —1- 1 GEAR WASH 128 IANGING BAR EXTRACTOR TDQJ ALL -MTD BUNKER GEAR LOCKERS GEAR STOR 129 oF'D MOVABLE BUNKER GEAR LOCKERS °FD OPEN MTL SHELVING rBATTERY CHARGING BATTERY -129 SPRINKLER MECH 133 BRACE FRAME 1 °FD o c rI I� I� Weinstein A+U .. .. .. ALTERNATE 6 & 11 ❑ 1 STATION OFFICE 107 AIRLO BOOT WASH 123 RECEIV 122 STOR Iro-RACK F010 °FD 117 W IIS D SII FUTUREII —_ J L_ J L_ J o ATH F 115 leo ADA BATH PFD 113 BATH 111 1 MAP WALL– FULL HTf BUILT-IN STOR BUILT-IN DESK BUNK 121 1 BUNK I 120 121A 120A SHIFT LOCKERS, TYP. CORRIDOR 119 118A 116A 114A 112A 1 1 11 1/4" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BUILT -I rf DESK, BUNK 116 BUNK 114 RECESSED WALK -OFF MAT FD ADA W 102 CAP BUNK 112 CORRIDOR 103 CAP OFFICE LOBBY= 101 E BJILT IN DISPLAY BUILT IN BENCH LINE OF OVERHANG ABV • 4 \ / COURTYARD (OPEN T\0 ABOVE) LINE OF OVERHANG ABV co co BBQ ALT.1• ALTS F'-�' AIA WALL -MTD MIRROR PHYS TRAIN 106 WATER BOTTLE FILL STATION WHITE BOARD– GREAT ROOM 104 4 SHIFT LOCKERS�U UNDERCOUNTER __ 111 D D D FUTURE DETOX p I PLUMBED INDIVIDUAL FOOD_ COFFEE BAR LOCKERS, 4 HIGH TV, F010 — 0 -- — — — J GAS METER ELEC 105 i TRANS TRANS FORMER BUILDING PLAN: SD SCHEME FUEL TERMINAL REMOTE FUEL DISPENSING STATION (4) BOLLARDS TYP ALTS NATE 7: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR –DESCRIPTION OF DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE (7) REMOVABLE BOLLARDS W/ 4"D FOR VEHICLE IMPACT PROTECTION PER IFC 2015 SEC 312 0 0 8'-0" TALL CMU ENCLOSURE 1/8" = 1'-0" ARCHITECTURAL SCREEN WI ELECTRIC SECURITY GATE 1T-5 ALTERNATE 9: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIVE ALTERNATE Tukwila Fire Station 51 1 100% Schematic Design 1 12/6/2017 / / / / / / / / / / / / // o /// 230'-3 3/4" /. 8'H SECURITY FENCE TYP AT NORTH, WEST & SOUTH SIDES Ank Ad& Alk link 42"W LOCKABLE ATE \ / ALTERNATE 7: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR DESCRIPTION OF DEDUCTIVE ALT ATE 2: SEE PRICING ALTS SCRIPTION OF BASE BID EXTERIOR COVERED STORAGE (UNCONDITIONED) EXTERIOR COVERED STORAGE (UNCONDITIONED) i ALTERNATE 7: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR DESCRIPTION OF DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE ORT SPACE; CONDITIONEI CH PLATFORI 2 -STORIES) APPARATUS BAY (DOUBLE -HEIGHT) LIVING QUARTERS & SUPPORT SPACES (SINGLE -STORY) \ ALTERNATE 9: SEE PRICING ALTS FOR DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIVE ALTERNATE \I N / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /I �I II II II I I I I I 7 0'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK PER 18.41.090B FRONT APRON w S\ ADJUSTED ROW SHOWN HATCHED 0'-0" SIDE A PER 18 41.090 33 � .- 7 / 7 7 7 7 ZONE: MUO (MIXED USE OFFICE) WITH TSO (TUKWILA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT) 1 \ ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN / / EG 32.00 SOU1NGENDER PKwy 4T-0„ A002) SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" GENERAL NOTES 1 SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR UTILITIES, PAVING & GRADING 2 SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTINGS & SITE FURNISHINGS PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOURS NEW CONTOURS SECURITY FENCE Rev Date Issue Tukwila Fire Station 51 Project No. 17001 Weinstein A+U Architects + Urban Designers, LLC 2200 Western Ave Seattle, WA 98121 T 206 443 8606 F 206 443 1218 www.weinsteinau.com © 2017 Weinstein A+U - These documents have been prepared specifically for the above named project. They are not suitable for use on other projects or in other locations without the approval and participation of the Architect. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Issue 100% Schematic Design Date 12/6/2017 Sheet Title ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Sheet A002 ARCHITECTS + URBAN DESIGNERS z W V1 z 120 PROJECT COSTS CITY OF TUKWILA Public Safety Plan Fire Stations - 51, 52, 54 Schematic Design Budget Summary (HIGH) YOE $ (in thousands) 1/30/2018 ireStation-Program INITIAL BUDGET ESTIMATE FS 52 6,567 sf FS 54 8,228 sf TOTAL 32,745 sf Project Category FS51 17,950 sf A/E Services (both design & CA) 731 356 464 1,551 Land Acquisition - 653 862 1,515 Permits/Fees 255 89 116 460 Construction (pre -con, const, tax) 7,809 3,278 4,273 15,360 Construction Related Costs (incl bond) 1,047 438 551 2,036 PM Services (incl other prof svcs) 460 297 397 1,154 Contingency (incl Construction & Proj) 1,145 546 665 2,356 TOTAL $ 11,446 $ 5,657 $ 7,329 $ 24,432 Fire Station Program - R SED BUDGET ESTIMATE (5123/17) FUNDING GAP ;_ ` i ° '<i 1;%.3: Project Category FS51' 9,426 sf FS 52 1 15,068 sf FS 54 9,287 sf TOTAL 33,781 sf FUNDING GAP A/E Services (both design & CA) 635 1,052 626 2,314 763 Land Acquisition 653 - 862 1,516 1 Permits/Fees 166 301 164 631 172 Construction (pre -con, const, tax) 6,324 9,547 6,233 22,105 6,744 Construction Related Costs (incl bond) 657 1,184 709 2,550 514 PM Services (incl other prof svcs) 300 576 305 1,181 28 Contingency (incl Construction & Proj) 749 1,094 765 2,608 252 TOTAL $ 9,486 $ 13,755 $ 9,665 $ 32,906 $ 8,474 1 The main fire station was originally identified as FS51, but has been changed to FS52 in the revised estimate. -. ` VI i 13 a " T STIMAT (1J2 8 _--`"-=k' FUNDING GAP ;_ ` i ° '<i 1;%.3: Project Category FS511 11,933 sf FS 52 1 15,068 sf FS 54 11933 sf TOTAL 38,934 sf A/E Services (both design & CA) 899 1,244 1,003 3,146 1,595 Land Acquisition - - 854 854 (661) Permits/Fees 234 353 262 849 390 Construction (pre -con, const, tax) 8,956 12,677 9,935 31,568 16,208 Construction Related Costs (incl bond) 931 1,398 1,039 3,367 1,331 PM Services (incl other prof svcs) 426 687 476 1,589 435 Contingency (incl Construction & Proj) 1,062 1,294 1,185 3,541 1,185 TOTAL $ 12,509 $ 17,652 $ 14,753 $ 44,914 $ 20,482 Z:\Council Agenda Items\Communications\PSP Funding and Costs - Fire Stations 012218_1K Updated, 1.22.18 -HIGH 121 122 S G TUKWILA PUBLIC SAFETY PLAN FACILITIES PLAN Project Schedule DECEMBER site selection program/site selection design and permitting bidding and construction move-in/occupancy completed • public outreach (A) Architect Contract Approval (B) Contractor Pre -Con Contract COUNCILMEMBER DECISIONS (D) Site Selection (E) Project Budget Changes (C) Contractor Construction Approval (F) Bond Sale #2 (G) GC/CM CPARB Start Finish 1 Done 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M AM J _. J A S O N D J F M A MJ JA S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D .CITYISOJ KICK-OFF MTG 10/05/16 10/05/1.6 100% ■ CITY VOTE 11/08/16 10/31/19 100% 1 30ND SALE 12/01/16 12/31/16 100% 1 'UBLIC OUTREACH - SITESELECTON 01/01/17 12/31/21 32% ,, 1110 JUSTICE CENTER 02/06/17 05/25/20 to%• _ i _ ._ _ rP _ D Bl 1 i _ t r' Ir lia"..411714111.1 - _ - 4 r - - STATION 51 0224/17 09/27/19 22% I 11 A I p B 1 II I STATION 52 0220/17 06/05/20 12% 1 I 1 A f - 1 t i 113 1 i r C STATION 54 02/20/17 06/05/20 12% 1 1A I 1 I I I ,IC. CITY SHOPS 02/20/17 04/0921 5% I i 11 A e 1 I (`, 1 site selection program/site selection design and permitting bidding and construction move-in/occupancy completed • public outreach (A) Architect Contract Approval (B) Contractor Pre -Con Contract COUNCILMEMBER DECISIONS (D) Site Selection (E) Project Budget Changes (C) Contractor Construction Approval (F) Bond Sale #2 (G) GC/CM CPARB 124 I N 5 T E N N A± U �eC-i"cCTS U AN )E»»IGNEs::S Project Subject To From Copies to Remarks Memorandum Fire matin` Project No. Date . v 5 , ,1�< Please include the following Alternates in the 100% SD documents forTFS51. Alternate 1: Covered parking at the south side of TFS51. a. Base Bid includes: 1) Replacement of slab and foundations illustrated on floor plans between Grids 1 &2 and A&F with grass landscaping. 2) Reduction of roof area illustrated in plans by 2,200 sf. 3) Deletion of structure supporting roof, including brace -frame at Grid 1. 4) Rear apron reduced in area by 3,200 sf. 5) Deletion of two roof drains 6) Deletion of lighting south of Grid 2 shown on E201 7) Addition of two exterior wall mounted light fixtures b. (Additive) Alternate No. 1 includes: 1) South -side covered parking scope illustrated in 100% SD Drawing Set. Alternate 2: Covered parking at the northwest corner of TFS51. a. Base Bid includes: 1) Replacement of slab and foundation illustrated on floor plans between 6&8 and C1&F with grass landscaping. 2) Reduction of roof area illustrated in plans by 1,100 sf. 3) Deletion of walls between Grids 6&8 and C1&F. 4) Deletion of lighting shown between Grids 6&8 and C1&F. 5) Addition of two exterior wall mounted light fixtures. b. (Additive) Alternate No. 2 includes: 1) Covered parking scope illustrated in 100% SD Drawing Set. Alternate 3: Tabled crosswalk and driveway cut at the Front Apron drive, per City of Tukwila Commercial Driveway Standard RS -09 (45 ft wide). a. Base Bid includes: 1) Alteration of existing curbs as illustrated in 100% SD Set b. (Additive) Alternate No. 3 includes: 1) Provide a tabled crosswalk and driveway cut at the Front Apron drive, per City of Tukwila Commercial Driveway Standard RS -09 (45 -ft wide). Alternate 4: Fire hydrant at west side of Rear Apron. a. Base Bid includes: 1) One fire hydrant at south side of Front Apron driveway, with domestic / fire service to the building and irrigation stub to the north parcel (see C2.0). b. (Additive) Alternate No. 4 includes: 2200 Western Ave, Suite 301, Seattle, WA 98121 Page 1 of 3 WeinsteinAU.com T 206 443 8606 17-1206 TFS51 SD Pricing Alternates_M.docx 125 l'',' E x N s E I N A _, (J '1 L,.ITECTS.'.;st R. DESIGNUIS 1) Fire hydrant at the west side of the Rear Apron, and associated DIP loop around the building, as illustrated in the 100% SD Set. Alternate 5: Fume Hood in the Shop. a. Base Bid includes: 1) No fume hood. b. (Additive) Alternate No. 5 includes: 1) Provide a ductless fume hood in the Shop, BOC Sentry Air Systems Model #SS-330-DSH. Alternate 6: Thermal Storefront Framing system at Apparatus Bay a. Base Bid includes: 1) Fiberglass windows per Elevations and per Section 08 43 16. b. Alternate No. 6 includes: 1) Thermal Storefront Framing system at Apparatus Bay, BOC EFCO Series 403X with 1" glazing (1/4" 5660 #2 x 1/2" Argon x 1/4" Clear) and TGI Wave Spacer (1/2"). 2) 3'-0" high 6" metal stud pony wall support with aluminum panel rainscreen (to reduce height of storefront from 14'-0" to 11'-0"). Alternate 7: Fuel Fill Station a. Base Bid includes: 1) Fuel fill tank and remote dispensing station, per 100% SD Drawing Set. b. (Deductive) Alternate No. 7A includes: 1) Locate fuel dispensing station at fuel tank c. (Deductive) Alternate No. 7B includes: 1) Delete fuel tank in full 2) Reduce size of masonry screen to accommodate only trash/recycling and generator Alternate 8: High Roof Overhang a. Base Bid includes: 1) Deep roof overhang per 100% SD Drawing Set, using cantilevered steel outriggers structure. b. (Deductive) Alternate No. 8 includes: 1) Delete steel outriggers and utilize 5'-0" OWSJ extensions for to achieve (less deep) overhang. Alternate 9: Public Parking a. Base Bid includes: 1) Three standard public parking stalls and one accessible public parking stall, located at south side of public parking area. b. (Additive) Alternate No. 9 includes: 1) Five standard parking stalls, located at north side of public parking area, per 100% SD Set. Alternate 10: EV -Charging Stations a. Base Bid includes: 1) Two double EV -Charging Stations, per E101 (providing power for 4 stalls, total) b. (Additive) Alternate No. 10 includes: 1) Provide two additional double EV -Charging Stations (providing power for an additional 4 stalls). 2) Increase building service power by Alternate 11: Four -Fold Doors a. Base Bid includes: 1) Sectional Doors at Apparatus Bay egress openings. See Section 08 36 13. b. (Additive) Alternate No. 11 includes: 1) Bi -Fold Doors and steel bollards at Apparatus Bay egress openings, per 100% SD Drawings. Reference also Section 08 36 13. 2200 Western Ave, Suite 301, Seattle, WA 98121 Page 2 of 3 WeinsteinAU.com T 206 443 8606 17-1206 TFS51 SD Pricing Alternates_M.docx 126 `JN N A ._ Alternate 12: Stainless Steel Countertops at Kitchen a, Base Bid includes: 1) Solid surface countertop at all kitchen countertops, including island and peninsula, per Section 12 36 00 2) Bottom -mount stainless steel sink. 3) Full height solid surface backsplash (to underside of upper cabinets). b. (Additive) Alternate No. 12 includes: 1) Stainless steel countertops at all kitchen countertops, including island and peninsula. 2) Integral stainless steel sink. 3) Full height stainless steel backsplash (to underside of upper cabinets). 2200 Western Ave, Suite 301, Seattle, WA 98121 Page 3 of 3 WeinsteinAU.com T 206 443 8606 17-1206 TFS51 SD Pricing Alternates_M.docx 127 128 ° D G Tukwila Fire Station #51 DRAFT SD Alternates 12/21/2017 ALT #1 ALT #2 ALT #3 ALT #4 Alternate Hard Costs Sub Bonds SUBTOTAL Design Contingency SUBTOTAL Escalation - Labor & Materials SUBTOTAL 185,816 112,247 5,500 37,135 11,096 SF ALT #5 ALT #6 5,547 -690 1.50% $2,787 91,684 $83 $557 $83 ($10) $188,603 $113,931 55,583 537,692 55,630 (5700) 5.00% 99,430 $5,697 9279 $1,885 9282 ($35) 5198,033 $119,627 55,862 539,577 55,912 ($735) 5.00% 59,902 $5,981 $293 $1,979 $296 ($37) 5207,935 $125,609 56,155 541,555 $6,207 (5772) Construction Managers Contingency 5.00% $10,397 $6,280 5308 52,078 $310 (539) Negotiated Support Services MACC TOTAL Lydig Specified General Conditions -Fixed Lydig Fee On MACC 100% SD Alternate Totals $218,332 5131,889 $6,462 $43,633 56,518 (5811) 4.50% $9,825 95,935 $291 51,963 $293 ($36) $228,157 $137,824 $6,753 $45,597 56,811 ($847) ALT #7A ALT #7B ALT #8 ALT #9 ALT #10 Alternate Hard Costs Sub Bonds SUBTOTAL Design Contingency SUBTOTAL Escalation - Labor & Materials SUBTOTAL Construction Managers Contingency Negotiated Support Services MACC TOTAL Lydig Specified General Conditions -Fixed Lydig Fee On MACC 100% SD Alternate Totals -28,923 -118,917 -30,361 10,407 23,000 ALT #10 ALT #11 22,600 6,247 1.50% ($434) (91,784) ($455) $156 9345 $339 $94 (529,357) (5120,701) (530,816) $10,563 $23,345 $22,939 56,341 5.00% (51,468) ($6,035) (51,541) $528 $1,167 $1,147 $317 (530,825) (5126,736) ($32,357) $11,091 524,512 $24,086 $6,658 5.00% ($1,541) ($6,337) ($1,618) 5555 51,226 51,204 9333 ($32,366) (5133,073) (533,975) 511,646 $25,738 525,290 $6,991 5.00% ($1,618) (56,654) ($1,699) 9582 51,287 51,265 5350 ($33,984) ($139,726) (535,674) $12,228 $27,025 $26,555 57,340 4.50% ($1,529) ($6,288) ($1,605) 5550 $1,216 $1,195 9330 (535,514) ($146,014) ($37,279) $12,778 $28,241 527,750 $7,670 Alt 1 Covered Parking at the south side of TFS51 Alt 2 Covered Parking at the NW corner of TFSS1 Alt 3 Tabled crosswalk and driveway cut at the front apron drive Alt 4 Fire hydrant at west side of Rear apron Alt 5 Fume Hood in the Shop Alt 6 Thermal Storefront Framing System at Apparatus Bay Alt 7a Locate fuel dispensing station at fuel tank Alt 76 Delete Fuel tank in full Alt 8 High Roof Overhang Alt 9 Public Parking Alt 10 EV Charging Stations Alt 11 Four Fold Doors Alt 12 Stainless Steel Countertops at Kitchen 130 TUKWILA FIRE STATIONS WEINSTEIN A+U TUKWILA FIRE STATION 51 ROOM DESIGN 1 On-duty assigned Staff 6 Assigned Staff (4 shifts, no swing) 24 Apparatus Bays 2 OPFRATIONS Apparatus Bay 3501 Airlock 161 Cleaning Alcove 48 Battery Charging Area 17 ADA Restroom w/shower (wet room) 55 Hose Storage Rack Shop/Tool 111 EMS Storage 106 Decon/Bunker Gear Cleaning 293 Bunker Gear Storage 480 App Bay Storage 151 SCBA Room/Cascade 267 OPF124T1ONS STIRTOTAI, 5.190 PI IRI,IC Vestibule Public Lobby AI)A Rperrnnnl _ 0 166 64 PI IRT .IC Si IRTOTA I, 2301 OFFICE Station Office Captain's Office c,,9141, Cincnr 323 137 OFFICESIJRTf1TAI, 1 _ 4601 I. VIN Kitchen/Divine 458 Davroom 1 2701 Physical Training 1 6911 LaundrW..anitorClose t T 1051 Sleeping Rooms & Lockers (6 total) 1 7561 Toilet/Shower (3 total) 1 2791 I.WING SIIRTOTAI 1 25591 T fTil ITV Mechanical Electrical Communications/ Data 218 127 94 TITTT,ITV SUIRTOTAI, 439 Receiving (aka Delivery) 109 REIT STIRTOTAI, (SF) 8.987 Circulation and Structure (approx 20%) Circulation and Structure (actual) Circulation & Stairs Interior walls & chases Exterior walls /, 797 2,109 1,235 257 617 TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE - 11,096 SECOND FLOOR Mechanical Porch (unconditioned) Pia tfnrm / Ctnra op / Mnnti 366 137 SECOND FT,OOR SURTOTAT, 1.2031 TOTAL GSF 11,933 131 132 City of Tukwila City Council Public Safety Committee PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes February 5, 2018 - 5:30 p.m. - Hazelnut Conference Room, City Hall Councilmembers: Thomas McLeod, Acting Chair; Dennis Robertson, Kathy Hougardy (by phone) Staff: Rachel Bianchi, Jay Wittwer, Bruce Linton, Gail Labanara, Chris Flores, Nora Gierloff, Peggy McCarthy, Sherry Wright, Henry Hash, Aaron Johnson, Laurel Humphrey Guests: Carrie Holmes, Shiels Obletz Johnsen; Steve Goldblatt, PSP Program Management Quality Assurance consultant; Jerry Thornton, resident CALL TO ORDER: Acting Chair McLeod called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. I. ANNOUNCEMENT II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Fire Station 51 Schematic Design Staff is seeking Council approval to proceed with the Design Development phase of the new Fire *Station 51 building. Schematic Design is now complete, providing the Council with the first predictable budget for the project. Both Weinstein A+U and Lydig Construction performed independent cost estimation of the schematic design, which was then reconciled to the satisfaction of all parties. Estimators took the costs identified for Station 51 and applied them to Stations 52 and 54. The projected cost for all three stations is approximately $20.4 million above the budget identified in the Public Safety Bond due to the market conditions previously discussed, and the Finance Committee is beginning review of alternatives for funding this gap. Staff recommends proceeding to the next phase, design development, while the Finance Committee identifies financing strategies. The Council will continue to have future decision points which can serve as off -ramps if a satisfactory funding strategy is not adopted. The proposed design includes savings associated with value engineering and does not include some of the programming options discussed previously, such as fueling station and extra parking. Mr. Goldblatt, the Council's Program Management Quality Assurance consultant, concurs with staff's recommendation to move forward to the next phase. Committee members discussed the proposal and asked clarifying questions. Chair McLeod asked if the Fire Department was satisfied with the trade-offs in the proposal. Firefighters present stated that square footage and storage will remain a concern, and that the on-site fuel station should be evaluated on the basis of operational savings as well. However, other staff and the consultant confirmed that the square footage is larger on all three station designs than on existing stations. Committee members agreed to forward the discussion to the Committee of the Whole with the following additional information requests: • Comparison of the size of the apparatus bay accommodating a ladder truck versus one needed for just an engine. Public Safety Committee Minutes February 6, 2018 • List of the alternatives that were priced but not included in the base price of the three stations. • Highlight the costs that are interdependent, such as those that are tied to construction. • Include a table of all rooms, uses, and square footage in the plan for Fire Station 51. • Confirmation that a generator remains in the program and base price. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 12, 2018 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED. B. Contract: Public Safety Plan Building Envelope Consultant Staff is seeking Council approval of a contract with JRS Engineering for envelope consulting services for Fire Stations 51, 52, 54, and the Justice Center buildings. A building "envelope" is the separation between the interior and exterior of a building, and associated services include control of air, water, vapor and thermal leakage. Envelope services are standard for construction projects and can be costly if not performed adequately. The estimated cost for envelope services for the design only phase of the Public Safety Plan projects is $80,000. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 12, 2018 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. C. Fire Department Apparatus Purchases Staff is seeking Council approval to purchase two Fire Pumper/Engines and one Aerial Ladder Truck with $3,091,784.01 in proceeds from the Public Safety Bond. A pricing discount of 3% is available through an existing Interlocal Contract for Cooperative Purchasing if the purchase is completed by March 2, 2018. The purchase price is also under the $3,597,123 amount budgeted in the Public Safety Plan. The ladder truck was planned for purchase in 2019, but staff recommends proceeding in 2018 to take advantage of the discount. Chair McLeod asked for staff to return to Committee of the Whole with an estimate of the other costs associated with outfitting the new vehicles, such as technology, decals, etc. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 12, 2018 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED. III. MISCELLANEOUS Adjourned 6:35 p.m. Committee Chair Approval Minutes by LH