HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L06-074 - HARKOVICH JONATHAN - FARNHAM BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTFARNHAM BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT BLA
12610 - 40 AV S
L06-074
•
cry of Tukwila
•
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Jonathan Harkovich
1201 Monster Road. S.W., Suite#320
Renton, WA 98055
October 22, 2007
RE: Farnham Boundary Line Adjustment—File #L06-074
Dear Mr. Harkovich
Staff has completed additional review of your for a Boundary Line Adjustment located at
40XX S. 126th Street, Tukwila, WA. City staff has the following comments that pertain to
Boundary Line Adjustment L06-074:
1) Please provide a revised plan with an original signature and notarization by the
property owners and notary, and an original signature and stamp by the surveyor.
2) The plan should not be marked "Preliminary." Refer to the enclosed Plan.
3) Please provide a minimum of three signed originals. Do not fold.
Once the revised original is submitted, it will be reviewed by the Chairman of the
Subdivision Committee. After it is approved, the signed original will be returned to you for
recording with King County. After the original is recorded with King County, submit a
copy with King County recording number, to the City of Tukwila to complete the Boundary
Line Adjustment process.
You may refer to the enclosed Short Plat and Boundary Line Adjustment recording
procedures handout for complete information.
If you have questions about the review process, please call me at (206) 431-3683 or via e-
mail at rfoxna,ci.tukwila.wa.us
Sincerely,
Cram_
Rebecca Fox
Senior Planner
Enc.
Rf
1 10/23/2007
6300 SouthcYtiter° ouYevkrc;°S'utt`e°YYM`e"ItiktAta, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
• •
SHORT PLAT AND BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
RECORDING PROCEDURES
Once your short plat or boundary line adjustment has received final approval and has been
signed by the Chair of the Short Subdivision Committee the planner will return the originals to
you to be reviewed by the King County Assessor's Office and recorded with the King County
Recorder's Office. You may either mail them to the Assessor's office with a check for the
recording fee or take the original documents to the King County Administration Building in
downtown Seattle.
STEPS:
1. Please provide a minimum of 3 sets of signed originals to the City for signature by the Chair
of the Short Plat Committee. If you want a signed original of the documents, then please
bring 4 sets. Make sure that your documents meet the recording requirements (margins, font
size, legibility). Documents may not be folded. For details on letter and legal size document
format requirements and fees go to:
http://www.metrokc.gov/recelec/records/recordersForms.htm
Information on requirements for record of survey format documents (18" by 24") is available
at this WAC link:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=332-130-050
Note that paper originals are now accepted for recording but they must be signed originals.
They also must otherwise comply with the standards referred to above.
2. Bring the signed originals to the Assessor's Office on the 7th floor to have the Department of
Assessments block signed. This can take up to two days, if you wish you can leave the
packet of originals and a check with Assessments and they will forward it on to the
Recorder's office when it has been signed.
3. The check for recording fees, as well as fees for any copies desired, should be made out to
the King County Recorder. If copies are submitted for "conforming" (recording number
label to be affixed), each label is $1.00. Conformed copies and/or any other copies requested
and paid for will automatically be mailed to the local jurisdiction (Tukwila) unless
instructions are given otherwise.
4. Next go to the Recorder's office on the 3rd floor to get the documents recorded. Letter and
legal sized documents must have the correct margins and the required information on the
front page. Documents in record of survey format must have a surveyor's stamp. Short
plats, boundary line adjustments, subdivisions and accompanying documents such as
easements are all recorded at the Condominium and Plat desk.
5. Return a recorded copy of your documents or a recording number to the City to complete the
approval process. The City cannot accept building permit submittals on any new lot until the
p:\Planning Forms\recordingprocedures Aug. 9, 07
• •
new parcel number has been received from the Assessor's Office, which generally takes a
week or two.
LOCATION: King County Administration Building
500 4t' Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Assessor's Office Recorder's Office
Floor: 7th Floor 3rd Floor Room 311
Phone: (206) 296-5141 (206) 296-1570
Hours: 8 — 4:30 M-TH 8:30 — 4:30 M -F
Documents for same day recording must be
submitted by 3:30 PM.
p:\Planning Forms \recording _procedures Aug. 9, 07
WAC 332-130-050: Survey requirements.
inside the Legislature
• Find Your Legislator
k Visiting the Legislature
k Agendas, Schedules and
Calendars
R Bill Information
* Laws and Agency Rules
a Legislative Committees
• Legislative Agencies
R Legislative Information
Center
* E-mail Notifications
(Listserv)
* Students' Page
* History of the State
Legislature
Outside the Legislature
• Congress - the Other
Washington
* TV Washington
* Washington Courts
* OFM Fiscal Note
Website
Access
AA.hWashingtant
• Page 1 of 4
How To Use This Site I About Us I Contact Us I Searc
Lccis!2`.0;-6 home ; Sene e Hesse cl cep -:.sen t;„e
Print Version 1 No disc
WACs > Title 332 > Chapter 332-130 > Section 332-130-050
332-130-040 « 332-130-050 » 332-130-060
WAC 332-130-050
Survey map requirements.
The following requirements apply to land boundary survey maps and plans, records of surv!
plats, boundary line adjustments, and binding site plans required by law to be filed or recordE
county.
(1) All such documents filed or recorded shall conform to the following:
(a) They shall display a county recording official's information block which shall be locatec
bottom or right edge of the document unless there is a local requirement specifying this infon
different format. The county recording official's information block shall contain:
(i) The title block, which shall be on all sheets of maps, plats or plans, and shall identify th
name of the firm and/or land surveyor that performed the survey. For documents not requirin
certificate and seal, the title block shall show the name and business address of the prepares
prepared. Every sheet of multiple sheets shall have a sheet identification number, such as "s
(ii) The auditor's certificate, where applicable, which shall be on the first sheet of multiple
however, the county recording official shall enter the appropriate volume and page and/or the
number on each sheet of multiple sheets;
(iii) The surveyor's certificate, where applicable, which shall be on the first sheet of multipl
shall show the name, license number, original signature and seal of the land surveyor who h;
charge of the survey portrayed, and the date the land surveyor approved the map or plat. Evi
multiple sheets shall have the seal and signature of the land surveyor and the date signed;
(iv) The following indexing information on the first sheet of multiple sheets:
(A) The section -township -range and quarter-quarter(s) of the section in which the surveye
except that if the parcel lies in a portion of the section officially identified by terminology other
parts, such as government lot, donation land claim, homestead entry survey, townsite, tract,
military reservation, then also identify that official subdivisional tract and call out the correspc
approximate quarter-quarter(s) based on projections of the aliquot parts. Where the section is
being described by projected aliquot parts, such as the Port Angeles townsite, or elongated
excess tiers of government lots, then it is acceptable to provide only the official GLO designa
representation of the section divided into quarter -quarters may be used with the quarter-quar
the surveyed parcel lies clearly marked;
(B) Additionally, if appropriate, the lot(s) and block(s) and the name and/or number of the
subdivision plat or short plat with the related recording data;
(b) They shall contain:
(i) A north arrow;
(ii) The vertical datum when topography or elevations are shown;
(iii) The basis for bearings, angle relationships or azimuths shown. The description of the
reference system, along with the method and location of obtaining it, shall be clearly given (s
by Polaris observation at the SE corner of section 6”; "Grid north from azimuth mark at statio
"North by compass using twenty-one degrees variation"; "None"; or "Assumed bearing bases
basis of direction differs from record title, that difference should be noted;
1 rh /A ^1 /0\ A A''/
WAC 332-130-050: Survey requirements.
. Page 2 of 4
(iv) Bearings, angles, or azimuths in degrees, minutes and seconds;
(v) Distances in feet and decimals of feet;
(vi) Curve data showing the controlling elements.
(c) They shall show the scale for all portions of the map, plat, or plan provided that detail r
scale shall be so identified. A graphic scale for the main body of the drawing, shown in feet,
included. The scale of the main body of the drawing and any enlargement detail shall be larg
clearly portray all of the drafting detail, both on the original and reproductions;
(d) The document filed or recorded and all copies required to be submitted with the filed o
document shall, for legibility purposes:
(i) Have a uniform contrast suitable for scanning or microfilming.
(ii) Be without any form of cross -hatching, shading, or any other highlighting technique the
diminishes the legibility of the drafting detail or text;
(iii) Contain dimensioning and lettering no smaller than 0.08 inches, vertically, and line wir
than 0.008 inches (equivalent to pen tip 000). This provision does not apply to vicinity maps,
seals and certificates.
(e) They shall not have any adhesive material affixed to the surface;
(f) For the intelligent interpretation of the various items shown, including the location of po
areas, they shall:
(i) Reference record survey documents that identify different corner positions;
(ii) Show deed calls that are at variance with the measured distances and directions of the
parcel;
(iii) Identify all corners used to control the survey whether they were calculated from a pre
record or found, established, or reestablished;
(iv) Give the physical description of any monuments shown, found, established or reestab
type, size, and date visited;
(v) Show the record land description of the parcel or boundary surveyed or a reference to
of record;
(vi) Identify any ambiguities, hiatuses, and/or overlapping boundaries;
(vii) Give the location and identification of any visible physical appurtenances such as fen
which may indicate encroachment, lines of possession, or conflict of title.
(2) All signatures and writing shall be made with permanent black ink.
(3) The following criteria shall be adhered to when altering, amending, changing, or corner
information on previously filed or recorded maps, plats, or plans:
(a) Such documents filed or recorded shall comply with the applicable local requirements
recording statute under which the original map, plat, or plan was filed or recorded;
(b) Alterations, amendments, changes, or corrections to a previously filed or recorded ma
shall only be made by filing or recording a new document;
(c) All such documents filed or recorded shall contain the following information:
(i) A title or heading identifying the document as an alteration, amendment, change, or col
previously filed or recorded map, plat, or plan along with, when applicable, a cross-reference
and page and auditor's file number of the altered document;
(ii) Indexing data as required by subsection (1)(a)(iv) of this section;
(iii) A prominent note itemizing the change(s) to the original document. Each item shall ex
L.{._.I/.- t- _ .___. nil A r.i-1_r---1._ ._ "1,1n 1,1n nrn
WAC 332-130-050: Survey *requirements.
• Page 3 of 4
what the change is and where the change is located on the original;
(d) The county recording official shall file, index, and cross-reference all such documents
manner sufficient to provide adequate notice of the existence of the new document to anyonr
the county records for survey information;
(e) The county recording official shall send to the department of natural resources, as per
(3), a legible copy of any document filed or recorded which alters, amends, changes, or corn
information on any document that has been previously filed or recorded pursuant to the Sury
Act.
(4) Survey maps, plats and plans filed with the county shall be an original that is legibly dr
on mylar and is suitable for producing legible prints through scanning, microfilming or other s
procedures. The following are allowable formats for the original that may be used in lieu of th
stipulated above:
(a) photo mylar with original signatures,
(b) any standard material as long as the format is compatible with the auditor's recording!
records storage system. Provided, that records of survey filed pursuant to chapter 58.09 RC1
the restrictions stipulated in RCW 58.09.110(5),
(c) an electronic version of the original if the county has the capability to accept a digital s
by a licensed certification authority under chapter 19.34 RCW or a certification authority unde
adopted by the Washington state board of registration for professional engineers and land sr.
can import electronic files into an imaging system. The electronic version shall be a standard
format acceptable to the county.
(5) The following checklist is the only checklist that may be used to determine the recorda
of survey filed pursuant to chapter 58.09 RCW. There are other requirements to meet legal s
checklist also applies to maps filed pursuant to the other survey map recording statutes, but •
there may be additional sources for determining recordability.
CHECKLIST FOR SURVEY MAPS BEING RECORDED
(Adopted in WAC 332-130)
The following checklist applies to land boundary survey maps and plans, records of surve
plats, boundary line adjustments, and binding site plans required by law to be filed or recorde
county. There are other requirements to meet legal standards. Records of survey filed purses
58,09 RCW, that comply with this checklist, shall be recorded; no other checklist is authorize
determining their recordability.
ACCEPTABLE MEDIA:
• For counties required to permanently store the document filed, the only acceptable media
[ ] Black ink on mylar or photo mylar
• For counties exempted from permanently storing the document filed, acceptable media are
[ ] Any standards material compatible with county processes; or, an electronic version of th
• [ ] All signatures must be original and, on hardcopy, made with permanent black ink.
• [ ] The media submitted for filing must not have any material on it that is affixed by adhesiv
LEGIBILITY:
• [ ] The documents submitted, including paper copies, must have a uniform contrast througl
document.
• [ ] No information, on either the original or the copies, should be obscured or illegible due t
hatching, shading, or as a result of poor drafting technique such as lines drawn through te>
pen size selection (letters or number filled in such that 3's, 6's or 8's are indistinguishable).
• [ ] Signatures and seals must be legible on the prints or the party placing the seal must be
identified.
• [ ] Text must be 0.08 inches or larger; line widths shall not be less than 0.008 inches (vicini
surveyor's seals and certificates are excluded).
WAC 332-130-050: Survey requirements. Page 4 of 4
INDEXING:
• [ ] The recording officer's information block must be on the bottom or right edge of the map
[ ] A title block (shows the name of the preparer and is on each sheet of multiple sheets).
[ ] An auditor's certificate (on the first sheet of multiple sheets, although Vol./Pg. and/or AF:
entered by the recording officer on each sheet).
[ ] A surveyor's certificate (on the first sheet of multiple sheets; seal and signature on multi[
• The map filed must provide the following indexing data:
[ ] S -T -R and the quarter-quarter(s) or approximate quarter-quarter(s) of the section in whic
parcel lies,
[ ] Optional: A graphic representation of the section divided into quarter -quarters may be u:
quarter-quarter(s) in which the surveyed parcel lies clearly marked;
MISCELLANEOUS
• If the function of the document submitted is to change a previously filed record, it must also
[ ] A title identifying it as a correction, amendment, alteration or change to a previously filec
[ ] A note itemizing the changes.
• For records of survey:
[ ] The sheet size must be 18" x 24"
[ ] The margins must be 2" on the left and 1/2" for the others, when viewed in landscape or
[ ] In addition to the map being filed there must be two prints included in the submittal; excc
counties using imaging systems fewer prints, as determined by the Auditor, may be allowe
[Statutory Authority: RCW 58.24.040(1) and 58_09.110. 00-17-063 (Order 704), § 332-130-050, filed 8/9/00, efl
Statutory Authority: RCW 58 24,049(1). 89-11-028 (Order 561), § 332-130-050, filed 5/11/89; Order 275, § 33;
5/2/77.]
Glossary of Terms 1 Comments about this site i Privacy Notice 1 Accessibility Information i Disc
1 _ _./'17Ani1 r_..ta ___.n _.__111 1'1(t AC fl 1n ,linnnn
• •
Cizy of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Jonathan Harkevich
1201 Monster Road. S.W., Suite #320
Renton, WA 98055
April 2, 2007
RE: Farnham Boundary Line Adjustment—File #L06-074
Dear Mr. Harkevich
Staff has completed review of your for a Boundary Line Adjustment located at 40XX S.
126th Street, Tukwila, WA. The Boundary Line Adjustment will form the basis of your
recent Short Plat application (L07-018). City staff has the following comments that pertain
to Boundary Line Adjustment L06-074 specifically:
1) Please show on BLA sheet 3 of 5 the five –foot -wide water easement that you have
shown on Sheet 1 of 6 on the S. 126th Street Short Plat plan document;
2) Execute separate easement documents for the ten -foot drainage easement and the
five-foot water easement;
3) Show the assessor's tax parcel numbers for existing parcels A and B;
4) Please refer to the enclosed sheet on recording procedures to ensure that you are
using the proper format, including paper size, separate signature boxes for King
County Recorder and Assessor, etc.
Please make the above revisions requested above. Prior to resubmittal, the revised plan
should be signed and notarized by the property owners and signed and stamped by the
surveyor. Once the revised original is submitted, we will route it to the Chairman of the
Subdivision Committee. Once it is approved, we will then return the signed original to
you for recording with King County.
If you have any comments about the specific comments, you may contact Public Works
Development Engineer Joanna Spencer directly at 206-431-2440. If you have questions
about the . review process, please call me at (206) 431-3683 or via e-mail at
rfox(i ci.tukwila.wa.us
Sincerely,
&C'L. 7;NC
Rebecca Fox
Senior Planner
Rf
1 04/02/2007
l I�LA L01 Lite
..eed d.dor
6300 Southce�iirer Voulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
• •
SHORT PLAT AND BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
RECORDING PROCEDURES
Once your short plat or boundary line adjustment has received final approval and has been
signed by the Chair of the Short Subdivision Committee the planner will return the originals to
you to be reviewed by the King County Assessor's Office and recorded with the King County
Recorder's Office. You may either mail them to the Assessor's office with a check for the
recording fee or take the original documents to the King County Administration Building in
downtown Seattle.
STEPS:
1. Make sure that your documents meet the recording requirements (margins, font size,
legibility). Documents may not be folded. For details on letter and legal size document
format requirements and fees go to:
http://www.metrokc.gov/recelec/records/recordersForms.htm
Information on requirements for record of survey format documents (18" by 24") is available
at this WAC link:
http://apps.leg.wa. gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=332-130-050
Note that paper originals are now accepted for recording but they must be signed originals.
They also must otherwise comply with the standards referred to above.
2. Bring the signed original and a copy to the Assessor's Office on the 7th floor to have the
Department of Assessments block signed. This can take up to two days, if you wish you can
leave the packet of originals, copies and a check with Assessments and they will forward it
on to the Recorder's office when it has been signed.
3. The check for recording fees, as well as fees for any copies desired, should be made out to
the King County Recorder. If copies are submitted for "conforming" (recording number
label to be affixed), each label is $1.00. Conformed copies and/or any other copies requested
and paid for will automatically be mailed to the local jurisdiction (Tukwila) unless
instructions are given otherwise.
4. Next go to the Recorder's office on the 3rd floor to get the documents recorded. Letter and
legal sized documents must have the correct margins and the required information on the
front page. Documents in record of survey format must have a surveyor's stamp. Short
plats, boundary line adjustments, subdivisions and accompanying documents such as
easements are all recorded at the Condominium and Plat desk.
5. Return a recorded copy of your documents or a recording number to the City to complete the
approval process. The City cannot accept building permit submittals on any new lot until the
new parcel number has been received from the Assessor's Office, which generally takes a
week or two.
p:\Planning Forms lrecording _procedures Aug. 8, 06
• •
LOCATION: King County Administration Building
500 4h Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Assessor's Office Recorder's Office
Floor: 7th Floor 3rd Floor Room 311
Phone: (206) 296-5141 (206) 296-1570
Hours: 8 — 4:30 M-TH 8:30 — 4:30 M -F
Documents for same day recording must be
submitted by 3:30 PM.
p:\Planning Forms\recording_procedu es
Aug. 8, 06
WAC 332-130-050: Survey map requirements. Page 1 of 4
Inside the Legislature
A Find Your Legislator
* Visiting the Legislature
Agendas, Schedules and
Calendars
A Bill Information
x Laws and Agency Rules
* Legislative Committees
A Legislative Agencies
A Legislative Information
Center
E-mail Notifications
(Listserv)
r. Students' Page
* History of the State
Legislature
Outside the Legislature
A Congress - the Other
Washington
* TV Washington
* Washington Courts
A OFM Fiscal Note
Website
Access
AAAWash ington,.
• •
How To Use This Site I About Us I Contact Us I Searc
Legis°a �-l.ire Horne I Seru to ( House of :eprescntatr,c
Print Version I No di4
WACs > Title 332 > Chapter 332-130 > Section 332-130-050
332-130-040 « 332-130-050 » 332-130-060
WAC 332-130-050
Survey map requirements.
The following requirements apply to land boundary survey maps and plans, records of survi
plats, boundary line adjustments, and binding site plans required by law to be filed or record
county.
(1) All such documents filed or recorded shall conform to the following:
(a) They shall display a county recording official's information block which shall be locatec
bottom or right edge of the document unless there is a local requirement specifying this infon
different format. The county recording official's information block shall contain:
(i) The title block, which shall be on all sheets of maps, plats or plans, and shall identify th
name of the firm and/or land surveyor that performed the survey. For documents not requirin
certificate and seal, the title block shall show the name and business address of the prepare'
prepared. Every sheet of multiple sheets shall have a sheet identification number, such as "s
(ii) The auditor's certificate, where applicable, which shall be on the first sheet of multiple
however, the county recording official shall enter the appropriate volume and page and/or the
number on each sheet of multiple sheets;
(iii) The surveyor's certificate, where applicable, which shall be on the first sheet of multipl
shall show the name, license number, original signature and seal of the land surveyor who hi
charge of the survey portrayed, and the date the land surveyor approved the map or plat. Ew
multiple sheets shall have the seal and signature of the land surveyor and the date signed;
(iv) The following indexing information on the first sheet of multiple sheets:
(A) The section -township -range and quarter-quarter(s) of the section in which the surveye
except that if the parcel lies in a portion of the section officially identified by terminology other
parts, such as government lot, donation land claim, homestead entry survey, townsite, tract,
military reservation, then also identify that official subdivisional tract and call out the correspc
approximate quarter-quarter(s) based on projections of the aliquot parts. Where the section is
being described by projected aliquot parts, such as the Port Angeles townsite, or elongated F.
excess tiers of government lots, then it is acceptable to provide only the official GLO designa
representation of the section divided into quarter -quarters may be used with the quarter-quar
the surveyed parcel lies clearly marked;
(B) Additionally, if appropriate, the lot(s) and block(s) and the name and/or number of the
subdivision plat or short plat with the related recording data;
(b) They shall contain:
(i) A north arrow;
(ii) The vertical datum when topography or elevations are shown;
(iii) The basis for bearings, angle relationships or azimuths shown. The description of the
reference system, along with the method and location of obtaining it, shall be clearly given (s
by Polaris observation at the SE comer of section 6"; "Grid north from azimuth mark at statio
"North by compass using twenty-one degrees variation"; "None"; or "Assumed bearing basec
basis of direction differs from record title, that difference should be noted;
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=332-130-050 03/20/2007
• •
(iv) Bearings, angles, or azimuths in degrees, minutes and seconds;
(v) Distances in feet and decimals of feet;
(vi) Curve data showing the controlling elements.
(c) They shall show the scale for all portions of the map, plat, or plan provided that detail
scale shall be so identified. A graphic scale for the main body of the drawing, shown in feet, t
included. The scale of the main body of the drawing and any enlargement detail shall be larg
clearly portray all of the drafting detail, both on the original and reproductions;
(d) The document filed or recorded and all copies required to be submitted with the filed o
document shall, for legibility purposes:
(i) Have a uniform contrast suitable for scanning or microfilming.
(ii) Be without any form of cross -hatching, shading, or any other highlighting technique the
diminishes the legibility of the drafting detail or text;
(iii) Contain dimensioning and lettering no smaller than 0.08 inches, vertically, and line wit
than 0.008 inches (equivalent to pen tip 000). This provision does not apply to vicinity maps,
seals and certificates.
(e) They shall not have any adhesive material affixed to the surface;
(f) For the intelligent interpretation of the various items shown, including the location of po
areas, they shall:
(i) Reference record survey documents that identify different comer positions;
(ii) Show deed calls that are at variance with the measured distances and directions of tht
parcel;
(iii) Identify all comers used to control the survey whether they were calculated from a pre
record or found, established, or reestablished;
(iv) Give the physical description of any monuments shown, found, established or reestab
type, size, and date visited;
(v) Show the record land description of the parcel or boundary surveyed or a reference to
of record;
(vi) Identify any ambiguities, hiatuses, and/or overlapping boundaries;
(vii) Give the location and identification of any visible physical appurtenances such as fern
which may indicate encroachment, lines of possession, or conflict of title.
(2) All signatures and writing shall be made with permanent black ink.
(3) The following criteria shall be adhered to when altering, amending, changing, or cornet
information on previously filed or recorded maps, plats, or plans:
(a) Such documents filed or recorded shall comply with the applicable local requirements
recording statute under which the original map, plat, or plan was filed or recorded;
(b) Alterations, amendments, changes, or corrections to a previously filed or recorded ma
shall only be made by filing or recording a new document;
(c) All such documents filed or recorded shall contain the following information:
(i) A title or heading identifying the document as an alteration, amendment, change, or coy
previously filed or recorded map, plat, or plan along with, when applicable, a cross-reference
and page and auditor's file number of the altered document;
(ii) Indexing data as required by subsection (1)(a)(iv) of this section;
(iii) A prominent note itemizing the change(s) to the original document. Each item shall ex
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/defaultaspx?cite=332-130-050 03/20/2007
WAC 332-130-050: Survey map requirements. Page 3 of 4
• •
what the change is and where the change is located on the original;
(d) The county recording official shall file, index, and cross-reference all such documents
manner sufficient to provide adequate notice of the existence of the new document to anyonr
the county records for survey information;
(e) The county recording official shall send to the department of natural resources, as per
(3), a legible copy of any document filed or recorded which alters, amends, changes, or corn
information on any document that has been previously filed or recorded pursuant to the Sury
Act.
(4) Survey maps, plats and plans filed with the county shall be an original that is legibly dr
on mylar and is suitable for producing legible prints through scanning, microfilming or other s
procedures. The following are allowable formats for the original that may be used in lieu of th
stipulated above:
(a) photo mylar with original signatures,
(b) any standard material as long as the format is compatible with the auditor's recording 1
records storage system. Provided, that records of survey filed pursuant to chapter 58.09 RC1
the restrictions stipulated in RCW 58.09.110(5),
(c) an electronic version of the original if the county has the capability to accept a digital s
by a licensed certification authority under chapter 19.34 RCW or a certification authority und(
adopted by the Washington state board of registration for professional engineers and land s�
can import electronic files into an imaging system. The electronic version shall be a standard
format acceptable to the county.
(5) The following checklist is the only checklist that may be used to determine the recorda
of survey filed pursuant to chapter 58.09 RCW. There are other requirements to meet legal s
checklist also applies to maps filed pursuant to the other survey map recording statutes, but •
there may be additional sources for determining recordability.
CHECKLIST FOR SURVEY MAPS BEING RECORDED
(Adopted in WAC 332-130)
The following checklist applies to land boundary survey maps and plans, records of surve
plats, boundary line adjustments, and binding site plans required by law to be filed or record(
county. There are other requirements to meet legal standards. Records of survey filed pursu:
58.09 RCW, that comply with this checklist, shall be recorded; no other checklist is authorize
determining their recordability.
ACCEPTABLE MEDIA:
• For counties required to permanently store the document filed, the only acceptable media
[ ] Black ink on mylar or photo mylar
• For counties exempted from permanently storing the document filed, acceptable media arr
[ ] Any standards material compatible with county processes; or, an electronic version of th
• [ ] All signatures must be original and, on hardcopy, made with permanent black ink.
• [ ] The media submitted for filing must not have any material on it that is affixed by adhesiv
LEGIBILITY:
• [ ] The documents submitted, including paper copies, must have a uniform contrast througt
document.
• [ ] No information, on either the original or the copies, should be obscured or illegible due t'
hatching, shading, or as a result of poor drafting technique such as lines drawn through te)
pen size selection (letters or number filled in such that 3's, 6's or 8's are indistinguishable).
• [ ] Signatures and seals must be legible on the prints or the party placing the seal must be
identified.
• [ ] Text must be 0.08 inches or larger; line widths shall not be less than 0.008 inches (vicini
surveyor's seals and certificates are excluded).
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=332-130-050 03/20/2007
1110
INDEXING:
•
• [ ] The recording officer's information block must be on the bottom or right edge of the map
[ ] A title block (shows the name of the preparer and is on each sheet of multiple sheets).
[ ] An auditor's certificate (on the first sheet of multiple sheets, although Vol./Pg. and/or AF;
entered by the recording officer on each sheet).
[ ] A surveyor's certificate (on the first sheet of multiple sheets; seal and signature on multi
• The map filed must provide the following indexing data:
[ ] S -T -R and the quarter-quarter(s) or approximate quarter-quarter(s) of the section in whic
parcel lies,
[ ] Optional: A graphic representation of the section divided into quarter -quarters may be u:
quarter-quarter(s) in which the surveyed parcel lies clearly marked;
MISCELLANEOUS
• If the function of the document submitted is to change a previously filed record, it must also
[ ] A title identifying it as a correction, amendment, alteration or change to a previously filec
[ ] A note itemizing the changes.
• For records of survey:
[ ] The sheet size must be 18" x 24"
[1 The margins must be 2" on the left and 1/2" for the others, when viewed in landscape or
1 ] In addition to the map being filed there must be two prints included in the submittal; excc
counties using imaging systems fewer prints, as determined by the Auditor, may be allowe
[Statutory Authority: RCW 58_24.040(1) and 58.09.110. 00-17-063 (Order 704), § 332-130-050, filed 8/9/00, efl
Statutory Authority: RCW 58.24.040(1), 89-11-028 (Order 561), § 332-130-050, filed 5/11/89; Order 275, § 33:
5/2/77.]
Glossary of Terms 1 Comments about this site 1 Privacy Notice 1 Accessibility Information 1 Disc
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=332-130-050 03/20/2007
• •
City of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION
Jonathan Harkevich
1201 Monster Road. S.W., Suite #320
Renton, WA 98055
January 9, 2007
Dear Mr. Harkevich:
RE: Farnham Boundary Line Adjustment /File #L06-074
This letter will summarize our recent phone conversations and meeting. We received the
materials that you sent in response to the letter to Charlotte VanLaningham (October 25,
2006) to complete your application for Boundary Line Adjustment at 40xx X. 126th Street,
Tukwila, WA. We have reviewed the materials and have determined that they are still
incomplete. Please provide materials that pertain exclusively to the "Farnham" boundary
line adjustment (#L04-074): In order to complete the application, we will need the following
information:
Recording Document:
• Provide legal description of Parcel A and Parcel B before and after the proposed
change. Include any existing and proposed easements.
• Clearly show existing and proposed boundaries for Parcel A and Parcel B on
drawing. Include any existing and proposed easements.
• Please note that the original submittal and the civil plans show different
configurations for proposed Parcel A. Which is correct? Please show the correct
version on the drawings and legal descriptions requested above.
Once the application is complete, staff will review the substance of the request. This
application will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of
the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code,
Section 18.104.070(E).
RF
Q:\Farnham BLA L04-074\Incomplete2.doc
SEC5IVE0,11 A
Crry
1101 3'° 2001
PERMIT CENT
o1/09/2007
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
• •
If you have any questions with this matter you may contact me at 206-431-3683 or via e-
mail at rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Fox
Senior Planner
RF 2 01/09/2007
Q:\Famham BLA L04-074\Incomplete2.doc
•
November 16, 2006
Telephone conversation with Jonathan Harkevich 425-228-5959 x238
We discussed what was needed to complete BLA applications. He has prepared civil plans
for both (?) applications.
He will be submitting an application for a planned residential development for the
"Farnham" BLA, and SEPA.
City of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION
October 25, 2006
Charlotte VanLaningham
1201 Monster Road. S.W., Suite #320
Renton, WA 98055>
RE: Farnham Boundary Line Adjustment
L06-074
Dear Ms. VanLaningham:
Your application for a Boundary Line Adjustment located at 40XX S. 126th Street., Tukwila„ WA
has been found to be incomplete. In order to be a complete application, the following must be
submitted to the permit center:
a. Recording Document
• Show legal description of all lots before and after the proposed change
• Show setbacks for proposed structures
b. Civil Plans
• Provide all materials as described in the Complete Application Checklist. Please
also include 5' topographic contours, any sensitive areas, and setbacks for proposed
structures.
Upon receipt of these items, the City will re -review the application for completeness and will mail
you written notification of completeness or incompleteness within 14 days.
The completeness review has raised several issues that you will need to address once you have
provided a complete application. These issues will need to be addressed and resolved during the
substantive review of your application and before the boundary line adjustment can be approved:
a. How will the proposed new lot be accessed?
b. There seems to be a discrepancy between the information shown on you have provided
regarding 41st Avenue South and the information provided by King County. Please provide
documentation from King County that clarifies the status of 41St Avenue South? Who owns
the property shown as 41St Avenue South? Is this vacated? It further appears that the lot #
rf1-
Q:\Farnham BLA L04-074\INCOMPLETE.DOC
1 10/25/2006
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
• *
7340600691 (owner: Daniel Hemenway), located at the southeast tip of your parcel
#7340600662 has no access.
This application will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the
date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.104.070(E).
If you have any questions with this matter you may contact me at 206-431-3683 or via e-mail at
rfox@ci.tukwila.wa.us.
Sincerely,
7L
ebecca Fox
Senior Planner
GG"_._7,,
Enc.
rf2—
Q:\Farnham BLA L04-074\INCOMPLETE.DOC
2 10/25/2006
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
For
Magestic Homes
Cornerstone
Geotechnical, Inc.
June 19, 2006
Mr. Mike Davis
Majestic Homes
1201 Monster Road SW, #320
Renton, Washington 98055
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
CG File No. 2064
Dear Mr. Davis:
17625 -130th Ave. NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072
Phone: 425-844-1977
Fax: 425-8441987
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation at your proposed single-
family residential project in Tukwila, Washington. The site is located between the 12600 block of 4151
Avenue South and 40th Avenue South, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1.
You have requested that we complete this report to evaluate subsurface conditions and provide
recommendations for site development. We have been provided with a copy of a site plan dated May 25,
2006, by Kenneth R. Anderson and Associates, titled "Davis Real Estate Group, Farnum/Tiede", that
shows the existing topography at the site.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The planned development consists of a total of six single-family residences. We have not been provided
with a grading plan, but we interpret that site grading may include cuts and fills up to 5 to 10 feet.
Infiltration/dispersal trenches are planned for each lot.
SCOPE
The purpose of this study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions and present
recommendations for site development. Specifically, our scope of services as outlined in our Services
Agreement, dated March 1, 2006, includes the following:
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 2
1. Review available geologic maps of the area.
2. Explore the subsurface conditions at the site with backhoe -excavated test pits.
3. Explore and evaluate the subgrade soils under the existing pavement at South 126t Street.
4. Provide recommendations for building foundations for the four remaining planned
residences.
5. Provide recommendations for future site preparations and grading.
6. Provide general recommendations for site drainage, including recommendations for the
planned infiltration/dispersal trenches based on the test results and City of Tukwila
requirements.
7. Prepare a written report to document our conclusions and recommendations.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface Conditions
The irregularly-shaped project site is about one acre in size, and has maximum dimensions of
approximately 380 feet in the east -west direction and 130 feet in the north -south direction. The site is
bordered by 40th Avenue South to the west, South 126t Street to the north and 41' Avenue to the east.
Two single family residences border the site to the south. A layout of the site is shown on the Site Plan in
Figure 2.
The site is generally moderately sloping to the southwest. Previous grading activities have shaped the site
into three tiers. The highest tier, in elevation, exists in the eastern region of the site and steps down to the
west in approximate 8- to 10 -foot elevation drops. Two foundations exist on site; with one on the upper
tier in the eastern region of the site and another exist on the lower tier in the western region of the site.
The site consists of field grass, shrubs and blackberry bushes and a large deciduous tree in the northern
region of the site.
Geology
Most of the Puget Sound Region was affected by past intrusion of continental glaciation. The last period
of glaciation, the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, ended approximately 11,000 years ago. Many of
the geomorphic features seen today are a result of scouring and overriding by glacial ice. During the
Vashon Stade, areas of the Puget Sound region were overridden by over 3,000 feet of ice. Soil layers
overridden by the ice sheet were compacted to a much greater extent than those that were not. Part of a
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 3
typical glacial sequence includes advance outwash sand overlain by glacial till. Advance outwash sand is
described as sand and gravel. Glacial till is an unsorted mixture of sand, silt, and gravel that was
deposited below the glacier, and is commonly referred to as "hardpan." The glacial till has been
consolidated under the weight of the glacier and exhibits both high strength and low permeability.
The geologic units for this area are mapped on the Geology of the Des Moines Quadrangle, Washington,
by Howard H. Waldron, et al (U.S. Geological Survey, 1962). The site is mapped as being underlain by a
deposit of glacial till with advance outwash mapped along the steep slope to the east of the site. Our site
explorations encountered varying amounts of fill material overlying glacial drift. Glacial drift, as defined
in this report, is similar to glacial till but is typically less dense and exhibits sorting or contains sand
seams.
Explorations
Subsurface conditions were explored at the site on March 7, 2006, by excavating a total of six test pits
and coring through asphalt in three locations within South 126th Street. The test pits were excavated to
depths of 9.7 to 12.7 feet below the ground surface. The explorations were located in the field by an
engineer from this firm who also examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, and maintained
logs of the test pits. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2.
The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a
copy of which is presented as Figure 3. The logs of the test pits are presented in Figures 4 and 5.
Subsurface Conditions
General: A brief description of the conditions encountered in our explorations is included below. For a
more detailed description of the soils encountered, review the test pit logs in Figures 4 and 5.
Test Pits: Test Pit 1, excavated in a gravel parking area in the north eastern region of the site
approximately 10 to 15 feet south of South 126th Street, encountered fill material to the depths explored at
12.7 feet. Fill material was observed to be loose to medium dense from 0.0 to 5.6 feet in depth and
became medium dense at 5.6 to the bottom of the exploration. Fill material consisted of an array of sands
and silty sands with roots, organics and household garbage.
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 4
Test Pit 2 was excavated on the north side of the existing foundation in the eastem region of the site. Fill
material consisting of medium dense, gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel was encountered at the
surface of the exploration to 2.3 feet in depth and a layer of buried topsoil was observed beneath the fill
from 2.3 to 2.6 feet in depth. The buried topsoil consisted of loose to medium dense, dark gray to black
silty fine to medium sand with gravel. Medium dense, brown mottled gray silty fine to medium sand with
gravel was observed beneath the topsoil at 2.6 to 3.8 feet in depth and was evaluated as being a native
deposit. The test pit was completed in dense, brownish -gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel at a
depth of 9.9 feet. This material is interpreted as glacial drift.
Test Pits 3 and 4 were excavated on the second tier in the central region of the site. Test Pit 3 was
excavated in the central region of the middle tier on a small knob. Loose to medium dense fill and topsoil
were observed in Test Pit 3 from the surface to a depth of 2.6 feet, and native medium dense to dense silty
fine to medium sand with gravel was observed from 2.4 to 10.2 feet in depth. This material is interpreted
as glacial drift. Test Pit 4, excavated in the northwest region of the middle tier, encountered loose to
medium dense fill material from the ground surface to 6.6 feet in depth and medium dense fill at depths of
6.6 to 11.5 feet. Medium dense to dense, native grayish -brown silty fine to medium sand with gravel was
observed at the bottom of the excavation at 11.5 to 11.9 feet in depth. This material is interpreted as
glacial drift.
Test Pit 5, excavated at the northwest corner of the existing foundation on the lower tier in the westem
region of the site, encountered 0.6 feet of topsoil and fill material from 0.6 to 10.5 feet in depth. Fill
material was evaluated as being medium dense to dense. Native dense, grayish -brown silty fine to
medium sand with gravel was observed at 10.5 to 11.0 feet in depth. This material is interpreted as
glacial drift.
Test Pit 6 was excavated off the shoulder of South 126th Street in the northwest corner of the site and
encountered 7.6 feet of medium dense fill material consisting of jumbled gray and brown silty fine to
medium sand with gravel. The test pit was completed in native medium dense to dense silty fine to
medium sand with gravel from 7.6 to 9.7 feet in depth. This material is interpreted as glacial drift.
Roadway Cores: Three locations were cored within South 126th Street, beginning with Core 1 near the
intersection of 40th Avenue South and ending at Core 3 at the intersection with 41st Avenue South. Cores
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 5
1 and 2 encountered 4 inches of asphalt with a thin layer of 5/8 -inch minus crushed rock underneath the
asphalt. Dense silty fine to medium sand with gravel was observed beneath the crushed rock. Core 3
encountered approximately 5 inches of asphalt and approximately 1 foot of pit run material consisting of
fine to coarse sand with gravel before encountering dense silty sand with gravel. The subgrade soils were
probed with a 1/2 -inch -diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod did not penetrate more than an inch in
depth.
Hydrologic Conditions
Slight to moderate groundwater seepage was observed in Test Pits 4 and 5 at depths of 8.5 and 7.3 feet,
respectively. Groundwater was observed in Test Pit 4 within a layer of fill containing fine gravel with
silty fine sand. The fine gravel had the appearance of washed rock and could be an old drain field.
Groundwater in Test Pit 5 was observed in a layer of fill consisting of fine to coarse sand with gravel.
The dense drift soils encountered at the base of our explorations are considered poorly draining. During
the wetter times of the year, we expect perched water conditions will occur as pockets of water on top of
the drift layer. Perched water does not represent a regional groundwater "table" within the upper soil
horizons. Volumes of perched groundwater vary depending upon the time of year and the upslope
recharge conditions.
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
Landslide Hazards
The core of the site is inferred to be composed of glacially overridden soils. We consider these soils to be
of high strength and considered to be stable with regard to deep-seated slope failures. We did not observe
indications of surficial seepage on the site, nor did we observe indications of shallow or deep-seated slope
failures. There is a potential that the surficial soils on the steeper sections of the slope could slough over
time. Any slough events are expected to be surficial, and are affected by surface water and man-made
impacts. The risk of slough events can be reduced if proper drainage is installed, vegetation on the slope
is maintained, and yard waste and other debris are kept off the slopes. We would expect if a slough event
were to occur, it would be small in scale and relatively shallow. We did not observe any indication of
recent sloughing on site.
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 6
Erosion Hazard
The erosion hazard criteria used for determination of affected areas include soil type, slope gradient,
vegetation cover, and groundwater conditions. The erosion potential is related to vegetative cover and the
specific surface soil types (group classification), which are related to the underlying geologic units. Over
the majority of the site we consider the erosion hazard to be slight with vegetative cover in place and
moderate when stripped of vegetation. Steeper areas, such as fill embankments, are generally considered
to have moderate potential for erosion when covered with vegetation and high when stripped of
vegetation. Best management practices (BMPs) and applicable codes should be followed during site
grading to limit potential for erosion. We do not expect this site will require unusual or extreme erosion
management methods. There are no water bodies adjacent to the site.
Seismic Hazard
It is our opinion based, on our subsurface explorations, that the Soil Profile in accordance with Table
1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) is Soil Class C. We referenced the 2002 map
from the US Geological Survey (USGS) website to obtain values for SS and S,. The USGS website
includes the most updated published data on seismic conditions. The seismic design parameters are:
SS 148.36% g
S, 51.09% g
Fa 1.0
F„ 1.3
From Table 1615.1.2(1) of the 2003 IBC
From Table 1615.1.2(2) of the 2003 IBC
Site specific coefficients and adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration
parameters apply as shown in Section 1615.1 of the IBC.
Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motions by
soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high groundwater table. The
underlying dense soil is considered to have a very low potential for liquefaction and amplification of
ground motion.
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
It is our opinion that the site can be developed into a residential subdivision. There are many areas of
geotechnical concern, and the planned development of the site will have to be designed to create a stable
condition: We recommend that the foundations for the structures extend through any topsoil, fill, loose,
or disturbed soils, and bear on the underlying medium dense or firmer, native glacial soils, or on
controlled structural fill extending to these soils.
gBased o thetdeptfirOl the fifil gnspunteredtby o plorations msz pect Fthattal_deep rfoundationis sy tem, pairy
uchia-Milled? iers 7witl:zbe needed ;•for lie planned, esidences:^ Alternafivelya tEe ,fill eTiiirdlibMirer'
excavated• aandgre lace with rock spalls or- structuralIZfill'as recommended -in -the Foundations p p ns subction
oftthis report
Based on the soils encountered in our explorations, it is our opinion that the subsurface conditions7atrthe
site, do not. appear
feasible for a`storm"`water infiltration system'or2fuli° dispersion -type system
Because the lots are small, we recommend that you consider one or more of the following alternatives;
limited infiltration, basic dispersion, rain garden, permeable pavement and rainwater harvesting similar to
those alternatives provide in the King County Surface Water Manual (KCSWM) — Appendix C, 2005.
Dry wells could also be used between the house and roadway. We have attached with this report a typical
dispersion trench that will allow for infiltration. If the storm water volume is large, the trench will fill up
then disperse over the ground surface. A vegetative buffer of at least 25 feet should be maintained from
the dispersion trench to the property line. We have included in this report typical sections from the
KCSWM, which illustrates such a system. The dispersal trench should be at least 10 feet long for each
700 square feet of impermeable surface area collected. We should be retained to review the storm design
and evaluate the location of the trenches and how they relate to the slopes.
The soils likely to be exposed during construction are highly moisture sensitive and will disturb easily
when wet or during wet conditions. e recommen • that construction take place • ming the drier'summer
morith5;;;aifp ssibletf construction takes place during the wet season, additional expenses and delays
should be expected due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include additional depth of site
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 8
stripping, export of on-site soil, the import of clean granular soil for fill, and the need to place a blanket of
rock spalls in the access roads and paved areas prior to placing structural fill.
Discussion on Settlement Potential of the Existing Fill
Our concern with the existing fill is that it is difficult to confidently characterize its engineering properties
and its consistency throughout the site. Even if the test pit explorations were representative of the range
of fill characteristics across the site, potential settlement could not be estimated with standard
geotechnical procedures. Instead, it would be estimated empirically, based on experience with past
performance of other uncontrolled fills and existing conditions. If the explorations were not
representative of the existing fill, additional unknowns would be realized. These include the aerial extent
of fill, the range of total depths of fill, the material type and consistency, depth to, and thickness of,
compressible zones, possible existence of voids, debris or highly organic zones, and possible existence of
well compacted fill.
Settlement of the existing fill could impact planned hard surfaces, such as roadways, sidewalks, and
garage slabs, causing cracking. Also, where the fill extends deeper than the planned underground utilities
(e.g., sewer lines), settlement of the fill under the utility lines could result in a localized "bellying" of
these lines. ire, we recommend that gravity -based underground piping systems be designed with a
gradient sufficient to counter the effects of localized settlement. Alternatively, the utility trenches can be
overexcavated through the loose or fill zones, with the removed soil replaced with compacted structural
fill. The settlement potential really depends on the density of the existing fill.
Site Preparations and Grading
The first step of site preparation should be to strip the vegetation, topsoil, or loose soils to expose medium
dense or firmer native soils in pavement and building areas. The excavated material should be removed
from the site, or stockpiled for later use as landscaping fill. The resulting subgrade should be compacted
to a firm, non -yielding condition. Areas observed to pump or weave should be repaired prior to placing
hard surfaces. Due to fill depths encountered, alternative to excavating fill soils may be needed and can
be evaluated at the time of construction.
The soils likely to be exposed during construction are considered highly moisture sensitive, and the
surface will disturb easily when wet. We expect these soils would be difficult, if not impossible, to
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 9
compact to structural fill specifications in wet weather. We recomnend that eacthwork.,bg.o ducte
daring the drier months. Additional expenses of wet weather or winter construction could include extra
excavation and use of imported fill or rock spalls. During wet weather, alternative site preparation
methods may be necessary. These methods may include utilizing a smooth -bucket trackhoe to complete
site stripping and diverting construction traffic around prepared subgrades. Disturbance to the prepared
subgrade may be minimized by placing a blanket of rock spalls or imported sand and gravel in traffic and
roadway areas. Cutoff drains or ditches can also be helpful in reducing grading costs during the wet
season. These methods can be evaluated at the time of construction.
Structural Fill
General: All fill placed beneath buildings, pavements or other settlement sensitive features should be
placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and
standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field -
observation procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in-place density
tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction.
Materials: hnporttd structural fill should consist of a good quality, frdr�inufanular soil, frie. of _
organics and other deleterious material, and be well graded to a maximum size of about 3 inches.
Ind, all-weather structural fill should contain no more than 5 percent fines (soil finer than a Standard
U.S. No. 200 sieve), based on that fraction passing the U.S. 3/4 -inch sieve.
The use of on-site soil as structural fill will be dependent on moisture content control. Some drying of the
native soils may be necessary in order to achieve compaction. During warm, sunny days this could be
accomplished by spreading the material in thin lifts and compacting. Some aeration and/or addition of
moisture may also be necessary. We expect that compaction of the native soils to structural fill
specifications would be difficult, if not impossible, during wet weather.
Fill Placement: Miming subgrade preparation, placement of the structural fill may proceed. Fill
should be placed in 8- to 10 -inch -thick uniform lifts, and each lift should be spread evenly and be
thoroughly compacted prior to placement of subsequent lifts. All structural fill underlying building areas,
and within a depth of 2 feet below pavement and sidewalk subgrade, should be compacted to at least 95
percent of its maximum dry density. Maximum dry density, in this report, refers to that density as
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 10
determined by the ASTM D1557 compaction test procedure. Fill more than 2 feet beneath sidewalks and
pavement subgrades should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density. The
moisture content of the soil to be compacted should be within about 2 percent of optimum so that a
readily compactable condition exists. It may be necessary to overexcavate and remove wet surficial soils
in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. All compaction should be accomplished
by equipment of a type and size sufficient to attain the desired degree of compaction.
Temporary and Permanent Slopes
Temporary cut slope stability is a function of many factors, such as the type and consistency of soils,
depth of the cut, surcharge loads adjacent to the excavation, length of time a cut remains open, and the
presence of surface or groundwater. It is exceedingly difficult under these variable conditions to estimate
a stable temporary cut slope geometry. Therefore, it should be the responsibility of the contractor to
maintain safe slope configurations, since the contractor is continuously at the job site, able to observe the
nature and condition of the cut slopes, and able to monitor the subsurface materials and groundwater
conditions encountered.
Far planning purposes, we recommend that temporary cuts in the fill zones and near -surface weathered
soils .be no steeper than 1.5 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (1.5H:1 V). Cuts in the dense drift may stand at a
111:1V inclination or possibly steeper. If groundwater seepage is encountered, we would expect that
flatter inclinations would be necessary.
We moommend that cut slopes be protected from erosion. Measures taken may include covering cut
slopes with plastic sheeting and diverting surface runoff away from the top of cut slopes. We do not
recommend vertical slopes for cuts deeper than 4 feet, if worker access is necessary. We recommend that
cut slope heights and inclinations conform to local and WISHA/OSHA standards.
Final slope inclinations for structural fill and the cuts in the native soils should be no steeper than 211:1V.
Lightly compacted fills or common fills should be no steeper than 3H:1V. Common fills are defined as
fill material with some organics that are "trackrolled" into place. They would not meet the compaction
specification of structural fill. Final slopes should be vegetated and covered with straw or jute netting.
The vegetation should be maintained until it is established.
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 11
Foundations
General: In. our opinion,, the site is suitable for support of the planned building provided that the
foundations are extended down into the medium dense or better native soils. This can be accomplished
with a deep foundation system, such as drilled piers, or by overexcavating down to medium dense or
better native soils. Due to the depth of fill encountered in our explorations, we expect that pre -drilled
shafts for concrete piers would be a more economical and expedient option than overexcavation.
Drilled Piers: Drilled piers can be used to support residences or portions of residences where fill exists
between the planned footing elevation and the underlying dense native soils. The piers are constructed by
drilling an open hole through any fill or loose surficial soils and into the dense native soil. The hole is
then filled with concrete immediately to reduce the chance of caving.
The bearing capacity of the piles will be subject to the soil conditions encountered, the depth into the
bearing soils, and the diameter of the pile. Since the required embedment depth is also tied to the
potentially variable depth of fill or loose soils, pile depth may vary from house to house and from pile to
pile. We recommend vertical load capacities for a 12 to 16 inch pile embedded 3 feet into native soil will
support a vertical load of 8 to 10 tons. We are available to provide greater load capacities based on the
size and embedment of the pile. An increase of one-third is allowed when using the alternate load
combination in Section 1605.3.2 of the IBC that includes wind or earthquake loads. Potential foundation
settlement using the recommended allowable bearing pressure is estimated to be less than 1 -inch total and
Y2 -inch differential between footings or across a distance of about 30 feet. We should be retained to
evaluate the drilling of the holes to verify bearing soils are encountered.
Conventional Foundations: CtThventionai shallow spread foundations should extend through the
existing fill zone and be founded on undisturbed, medium dense or firmer soil. If the soil at the planned
bottom of footing elevation is not suitable, it should be overexcavated to expose suitable bearing soil and
the excavation should be filled with rock spalls or structural fill, or the footing may be over -poured with
extra concrete. If structural fill or rock spalls are used, the trench should extend at least 1 foot beyond the
footing on each side for every 2 feet of rock that will be placed under the footing.
Footings should extend at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished ground surface for frost
protection and it should also extend at least 1 foot into bearing soils, whichever is deeper. Minimum
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 12
foundation widths should conform to IBC requirements. Standing water should not be allowed .to
accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation
excavation prior to placing concrete.
For fftmtions constructed as outlined above, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of
2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) be used for the footing design. An increase of one-third is allowed
when using the alternate load combination in Section 1605.3.2 of the IBC that includes wind or
earthquake loads. Potential foundation settlement using the recommended allowable bearing pressure is
estimated to be less than 1 -inch total and Y2 -inch differential between footings or across a distance of
about 30 feet. Higher soil bearing values may be appropriate for footings founded on the unweathered
drift, and with wider footings. These higher values can be determined after a review of a specific design.
Lateral Loads
The lateral earth pressure acting on retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the soil
behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement, which can occur as backfill is placed, and the
inclination of the backfill. Walls that are free to yield at least one -thousandth of the height of the wall are
in an "active" condition. Walls restrained from movement by stiffness or bracing are in an "at -rest"
condition. Active earth pressure and at -rest earth pressure can be calculated based on equivalent fluid
density. Equivalent fluid densities for active and at -rest earth pressure of 37 pounds per cubic foot (pcf)
and 57 pcf, respectively, may be used for design for a level backslope. These values assume that the on-
site soils or imported granular fill are used for backfill, and that the wall backfill is drained. The
preceding values do not include the effects of surcharges, such as due to foundation loads or other surface
loads. Surcharge effects should be considered where appropriate. The above drained active and at -rest
values should be increased by a uniform pressure of 8.2H and 25.7H psf, respectively, when considering
seismic conditions. H represents the wall height.
The above lateral pressures may be resisted by friction at the base of the wall and passive resistance
against the foundation, concrete piers, and grade beams. A coefficient of friction of 0.45 may be used to
determine the base friction in the native glacial soils. An equivalent fluid density of 225 pcf may be used
for passive resistance design. To achieve this value of passive pressure, the foundations should be poured
"neat" against the native dense soils, or compacted fill should be used as backfill against the front of the
footing, and the soil in front of the wall should extend a horizontal distance at least equal to three times
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 13
the foundation depth. A factor of safety of 2.0 has been applied to the passive pressure to account for
required movements to generate these pressures. The friction coefficient does not include a factor of
safety.
All wall backfill should be well compacted. Care should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess lateral
soil pressures due to overcompaction of the wall backfill. This can be accomplished by placing wall
backfill in 8 -inch loose lifts and compacting with small, hand -operated compactors.
Slabs -On -Grade
Slab -on -grade areas should be prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading
subsection. Slabs should be supported on medium dense or firmer native soils, or on structural fill
extending to these soils. Where moisture control is a concern, we recommend that slabs be underlain by 6
inches of free -draining coarse sand or pea gravel for use as a capillary break. A suitable vapor barrier,
such as heavy plastic sheeting, should be placed over the capillary break. An additional 2 -inch -thick
damp sand blanket should be used to cover the vapor barrier to protect the membrane and to aid in curing
the concrete. This will also help prevent cement paste bleeding down into the capillary break through
joints or tears in the vapor barrier. The capillary break material should be connected to the footing drains
to provide positive drainage.
Drainage
We yeeormnend that runoff from impervious surfaces, such as roofs, driveway and access roadways, be
collected and routed to an appropriate storm water discharge system. We suggest that the finished ground
surface be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent minimum for a distance of at least 10 feet away from the
buildings, as indicated in IBC Section 1803.3. Surface water should be collected by permanent catch
basins and drain lines, and be discharged into a storm drain system. Surface water should be dispensed as
shown in the attached King County Typical Section — Figure C.2.4.B. If it is determined the dispersal
trench is not feasible, other alternatives could be used and should follow any codes by the City of
Tukwila. Since the storm water may infiltrate into the existing fill, we should be retained to evaluate the
location of the discharging areas to evaluate stability and settlement of the fill.
We recommend that footing drains be used around all of the structures where moisture control is
important. It is good practice to use footing drains installed at least 1 foot below the planned finished
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 14
floor slab or crawl space elevation to provide drainage for the crawl space. At a minimum, the crawl
space should be sloped to drain to an outlet tied to the drainage system or to a pipe that allows positive
flow until it daylights. Surface water or groundwater should not be allowed to puddle in the crawl space.
The footing drains should consist of 4 -inch -diameter perforated PVC pipe that is surrounded by free -
draining material, such as pea gravel. Footing drains should discharge into tightlines leading to an
appropriate collection and discharge point. Crawl spaces should be sloped to drain, and a positive
connection should be made into the foundation drainage system. For slabs -on -grade, a drainage path
should be provided from the capillary break material to the footing drain system. Roof drains should not
be connected to wall or footing drains.
Utilities
Our explorations indicate that specific deep dewatering will not be needed to install utilities. Anticipated
groundwater is expected to be handled with pumps in the trenches. We also expect that some
groundwater seepage may develop during and following the wetter times of the year. We expect this
seepage to mostly occur in pockets. We do not expect significant volumes of water in these excavations.
The soils likely to be exposed in utility trenches after site stripping are considered highly moisture
sensitive. We recommend that they be considered for trench backfill during the drier portions of the year.
Provided these soils are within 2 percent of their optimum moisture content, they should be suitable to
meet compaction specifications. During the wet season, it may be difficult to achieve compaction
specifications; therefore, soil amendment with kiln dust or cement may be needed to achieve proper
compaction with the on-site materials.
Pavement
The performance of roadway pavement is critically related to the conditions of the underlying subgrade.
Based on the cores taken during our explorations, it appeared that the paved road section was not as thick
as County standards would dictate. However, the underlying subgrade appeared to be firm, and the road
surface appeared to be performing adequately. We recommend that the existing asphalt surfacing be left
in place during construction and evaluated for its performance under the repeated heavy loading typically
associated with construction traffic (e.g., trucks, loaders, etc.).
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Farnum Property
Tukwila, Washington
June 19, 2006
CG File No. 2064
Page 15
In all areas other than the existing pavement, we recommend that the subgrade soils under planned hard
surfaces be prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading subsection of this report. Prior
to placing base material, the subgrade soils should be compacted to a non -yielding state with a vibratory
roller compactor and then proof -rolled with a piece of heavy construction equipment, such as a fully -
loaded dump truck. Any areas with excessive weaving or flexing should be overexcavated and
recompacted or replaced with a structural fill or crushed rock placed and compacted in accordance with
recommendations provided in the Structural Fill subsection of this report.
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION
We should be retained to provide observation and consultation services during construction to confirm
that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, and to provide
recommendations for design changes, should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those
anticipated. As part of our services, we would also evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation
installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications.
USE OF THIS REPORT
We have prepared this report for Majestic Homes and its agents, for use in planning and design of this
project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and
estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty
of subsurface conditions.
The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our
recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures, except as specifically described in our report, for consideration in design. There are possible
variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget
and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our
services have been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the
time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood.
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
a
Sincerely,
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Jeff Laub, LG
Project Geologist
(EXPIRES 08/16/aa
Rick B. Powell, PE
Principal
JRW:JPL:RBP:nt
Three Copies Submitted
Five Figures
Attachments: Figure C.2.4.B from the 2005 King County, Washington Surface Water Design Manual
Information about this Geotechnical Engineering Report
Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc.
Vicinity Map
II
N
Cornerstone
Geotechnical, Inc.
17625 -130th Ave NE, C-102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072
Phone: (425) 844-1977
Fax: (425) 844-1987
Majestic Homes - Farnum Property
File Number
2064
IFigure
1
• .... ,„ ,
\ -... ,-.....
\
\ TP ..,',....
\ .,' s.... ...,,,, z,...
\ \.. •••••, ...`, ...,
\ s4.— .."...
\\ \ \\
1 \ .. ....,,-... -. -...„, -....
,. ,:,4i.
...,..., ..:p.. -,..
...
\ \ \
\ \ ,ik \ -..
-.... \
\ .--- ,•-•z:/.. .—. s.
\. \ '-'--- \ •
...., ----....„ \ \4...,.. . ;;‘'',, - .... . . ••• , " . . , , , , . ...,... : ' -. . . . ,.. - . , . ,
/ .. ....-•..,..
-•••...",..\-*--.
,, "--\•\ ‘ 'N.
\ 41*
..-4' ) .00:4° •• \
----.. - , \....,--:-.zz,1! \ ••••,,„/
...*:•:-\ \\\‘•
-,
- . \
--------. :-__-1--,--------1,..:--%\\\
.
40
\ . J
41, • • )) ii4 X-... \ -\ \\ \\ 4,... \ • .-
1 il
1 6 4
----,
•,.... 1, f \ \ \ \
\ I \ .
\ „---
---- / Ar
\ 4 I -...4-- - I I - \ '..4 \ .403.• /
1 I •_• 11 ; ---- ''' \,.. /
i i 4°.• 1 I -----'t-------- 4 ''''-iir 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ ,
/,
\\ -- '' \ ' \ \ utio
\
•-... 4—s —v"-'—' ,---
0
40
80
Scale 1" = 40'
Reference: Site Plan based on electronic site plan provided by Kenneth R. Anderson and Associates.
dated May 25, 2006 and titled "Farnum / Tiede".
Site Plan
N
LEGEND
TP -1
Number and Approximate
Location of Test Pit
C-1
Number and Approximate
Location of Roadway Cores
Cornerstone
Geotechnical,
17625 -130th Ave NE, C-102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072
Phone: (425) 844-1977 Majestic Homes - Farnum Property
Fax: (425) 844-1987
File Number Figure
2064 1 2
Unified Soil Classification System
MAJORGROUP
DIVISIONS
SYMBOL
GROUP NAME
COARSE -
GRAINED
SOILS
MORE THAN 50%
RETAINED ON
number 200 SIEVE
GRAVEL
MORE THAN 50% OF
COARSE FRACTION
RETAINED ON NO. 4
SIEVE
CLEAN GRAVEL
GW
WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL
GP
POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL
GRAVEL
WITH FINES
GM
SILTY GRAVEL
GC
CLAYEY GRAVEL
SAND
MORE THAN 50% OF
COARSE FRACTION
PASSES NO.4 SIEVE
CLEAN SAND
SW
WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND
SP
POORLY -GRADED SAND
SAND
WITH FINES
SM
SILTY SAND
SC
CLAYEY SAND
FINE -
GRAINED
SOILS
MORE THAN 50%
PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE
SILT AND CLAY
LIQUID LIMIT
LESS THAN 50%
INORGANIC
ML
SILT
CL
CLAY
ORGANIC
OL
ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY
SILT AND CLAY
LIQUID LIMIT
50% OR MORE
INORGANIC
MH
SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT
CH
CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY
ORGANIC
OH
ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
PT
PEAT
NOTES:
SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS
1) Field classification is based on Dry -Absence of moisture, dusty, dry
visual examination of soil in general to the touch
accordance with ASTM D 2488-83.
2) Soil classification using laboratory Moist- Damp, but no visible water
tests is based on ASTM D 2487-83. Wet- Visible free water or saturated,
3) Descriptions of soil density or usually soil is obtained from
consistency are based on below water table
interpretation of blowcount data,
visual appearance of soils, and/or
test data.
Cornerstone Phone: (425) 844-1977
} Geotechnical, Inc. Fax: (425) 844-1987
17625 -130th Ave NE, C-102 • Woodinville, WA' 98072
Unified Soil Classification System
Figure 3
DEPTH
LOG OF EXPLORATION
USC SOIL DESCRIPTION
TEST PIT ONE
0.0 - 0.3 GP FINE GRAVEL WITH FINE TO COARSE SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (FILL)
0.3 - 2.2 SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE,
MOIST) (FILL)
2.2 - 5.6 SM DARK BROWN TO BLACK SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL ROOTS AND
HOUSEHOLD GARBAGE (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (FILL)
5.6-10.5 SM BROWNISH GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE,
MOIST TO WET) (FILL)
10.5 -12.1 SM JUMBLED GRAY BROWN AND BLUISH GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH
GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST TO WET) (FILL)
12.1 -12.7 SP BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE ROOTS AND ORGANICS (MEDIUM
DENSE, WET) (FILL)
SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 8.2, 11.2, 11.8 AND 12.7 FEET
GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 12.7 FEET ON 3/7/06
TEST PIT TWO
0.0 - 2.3 SM DARK GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST)
(FILL)
2.3 - 2.6 SM DARK GRAY TO BLACK SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (LOOSE TO
MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (TOPSOIL)
2.6 - 3.8 SM BROWN MOTTLED GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM
DENSE, MOIST)
3.8 - 9.9 SM BROWNISH GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST)
(GLACIAL DRIFT)
SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 3.4 AND 6.7 FEET
GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 9.9 FEET ON 3/7/06
TEST PIT THREE
0.0 -1.5 SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE,
MOIST) (FILL)
1.5 - 2.4 SM DARK BROWN TO BLACK SILTY FINE SAND WITH ROOTS AND ORGANICS (LOOSE
TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (TOPSOIL)
2.4 - 5.3 SM BROWN MOTTLED GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM
DENSE, MOIST TO WET)
5.3 -10.2 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL
DRIFT)
SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 3.1 AND 7.2 FEET
GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 10.2 FEET ON 3/7/06
CORNERSTONE GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
FILE NO 2064
FIGURE 4
DEPTH
LOG OF EXPLORATION
USC SOIL DESCRIPTION
TEST PIT FOUR
0.0 - 2.4
2.4 - 6.6
6.6 - 7.7
7.7 - 11.5
11.5 - 11.9
TEST PIT FIVE
0.0 - 0.6
0.6 - 3.8
3.8 - 8.0
8.0 -10.5
10.5 - 11.0
TEST PIT SIX
0.0 - 7.6
7.6 - 9.5
9.5 - 9.7
SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL AND ORGANICS (MEDIUM
DENSE, MOIST) (FILL)
SM JUMBLED GRAY AND BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (LOOSE
TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST TO WET) (FILL)
SW FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) (FILL)
GP FINE GRAVEL WITH SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) (FILL)
SM GRAYISH BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO
DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL DRIFT)
SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 3.1, 6.9, 7.9 AND 11.7 FEET
MODERATE GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS ENCOUNTERED AT 8.5 FEET
MODERATE TEST PIT CAVING WAS ENCOUNTERED BELOW 5.2 FEET
TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 11.9 FEET ON 3/7/06
SM DARK BROWN TO BLACK SILTY FINE SAND WITH ROOTS AND ORGANICS (LOOSE,
MOIST) (TOPSOIL)
SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST)
(FILL)
SM BROWNISH GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST)
(FILL)
SW BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (FILL)
SM GRAYISH BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST)
(GLACIAL DRIFT)
SM
SM
SM
SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 8.4 AND 11.0 FEET
SLIGHT GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS ENCOUNTERED AT 7.3 FEET
TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 11.0 FEET ON 3/7/06
JUMBLED GRAY AND BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM
DENSE, MOIST) (FILL)
BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST)
GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL
DRIFT)
SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 6.6, 8.3 AND 9.7 FEET
GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED
TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 9.7 FEET ON 3/7/06
CORNERSTONE GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
FILE NO 2064
FIGURE 5
C.2.4 BASIC DISPERSION
FIGURE C.2.4.B TYPICAL GRAVEL -FILLED DISPERSION TRENCH FOR BASIC DISPERSION
do a
d G op VA da °d
aa poo°
apo oa°a�pv o°
° a ,V°° °
1;7'70,6 o ° o°
° o v° ° o v °o
a
o ° �d 0oDd°a do°oa°
18' min
TRENCH X -SECTION
NTS
slope
4" pert pipe
level outlet
11/2" - 3/4" washed rock
5_700 sq. ft.
>700 sq. ft.
small catch basin or yard drain
25'=Foot Vegetated
1=ibw ath':S:rin
e: ret;y
P 9
Simple 10 -foot trench
Type I CB
?25=o'ot Vegtatec(
:FGawpatl : S:egmenf
Maximum 50 -foot trench w/notch
board (see Figure C.2.1.D, p. C-32)
PLAN VIEW OF ROOF
NTS
' 2005 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix C
C-53
1/24/2005
C.2.1 FULL DISPERSION
FIGURE C.2.1.D 50 -FOOT DISPERSION TRENCH WITH NOTCHED BOARD
notched
grade board
2"x 2" notches
18" 0.C.
pipe 0.D.
1'-0 1'-0
min min
end cap or plug
v �% clean out wye from pipe
°n LI° ° 4" or 6" perforated pipe laid flat/level
o°
vp °° type 1 CB w/solid cover (locking)
°
\v°
°
° v°
vOh
O
oclean out wye from pipe
influent pipe (max design
flow <_ 0.5 CFS per trench)
galvanized bolts
2" x12''7
pressure
treated grade
board
c
6
N
cnn
°lo
PLAN
NTS
1'-0
pipe O.D.
1'-0
min
min
4" x 4' support post
°
°
°
✓
+20% `(\a)(
/.
o 4" or 6" perforated
° v \4 pipe laid flat
a 00
V L7
•
°
v /
EIWa0 a
filter fabric
SECTION A -A
NTS
clean (<_ 5% fines)
11/2" - 3/4 " washed rock
flow to second
dispersal trench
if necessary
flow to other
branching CB's
as necessary
type 1 CB
w/solid cover
2" grade
board notches
NOTES:
1. This trench shall be constructed so
as to prevent point discharge and/or
erosion.
2. Trenches may be placed no closer
than 50 feet to one another. (100 feet
along flowline)
3. Trench and grade board must be
level. Align to follow contours of site.
4. Support post spacing as required by
soil conditions to ensure grade board
remains level.
2005 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix C 1/24/2005
C-33
Irnportaot Inlormation About Your
Geotocbnical Engineering Report
Subsurface problems are a principal'cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes.
The following inforrnatior, is provided to help you manage your, risks.
Geotechnical Services Are Performed for
Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of
their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi-
neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another
civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each
geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No
one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without
first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one
— not even you —should apply the report for any purpose or project
except the one originally contemplated.
Read the Full Report
Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical
engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary.
Do not read selected elements only.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on
A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors
Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific fac-
tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the
client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general
nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of
the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements,
such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the
geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth-
erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was:
• not prepared for you,
• not prepared for your project,
• not prepared for the specific site explored, or
• completed before important project changes were made.
Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical
engineering report include those that affect:
• the function of the proposed structure, as when its changed from a
parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant
to a refrigerated warehouse,
• elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the
proposed structure,
• composition of the design team, or
• project ownership.
As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project
changes—even minor ones—and request an assessment of their impact.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems
that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which
they were not informed.
Subsurface Conditions Can Change
A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at
the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineer-
ing report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of
time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site;
or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua-
tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report
to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or
analysis could prevent major problems.
Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional
Opinions
Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where
subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi-
neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional
judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the
site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ—sometimes significantly—
from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer
who developed your report to provide construction observation is the
most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated
conditions.
A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final
Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your
report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engi-
neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical
engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual
subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical
engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or
liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform
construction observation.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to
Misinterpretation
Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering
reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geo-
technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after
submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti-
nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can
also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by
having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction
conferences, and by providing construction observation.
Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs
Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon
their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or
omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should
never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.
Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize
that separating togs from the report can elevate risk.
Give Contractors a Complete Report and
Guidance
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make
contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what
they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con-
tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, but preface it with a
clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the
report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the
report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical
engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to
conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they
need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contrac-
tors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you
be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you,
while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities
stemming from unanticipated conditions.
Read Responsibility Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that
geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disci-
plines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that
have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes-. To help reduce the risk
of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of
explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations"
many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsi-
bilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities
and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical
engineer should respond fully and frankly.
Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered
The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenviron-
mental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical
study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually
relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations;
e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or
regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led
to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoen-
vironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk man-
agement guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for
someone else.
Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold
Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction,
operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from
growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be
devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a com-
prehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional
mold prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or
moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a num-
ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry.
While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been
addressed as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings
are conveyed in this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this
project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services per-
formed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's study
were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold preven-
tion. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed
in this report will not of itself be sufficient to prevent mold from
growing in or on the structure involved.
Rely, on Your ASFE-Member Geotechncial
Engineer for Additional Assistance
Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical
engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of
genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer
with you ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information.
.asp
The Hest People on Ferth
8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Telephone: 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017
e-mail: info@asfe.org www.asfe.org
Copyright 2004 by ASFE, Inc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with ASFE's
specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of ASFE, and only for
purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of ASFE may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geotechnical engineering report. Any other
firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being an ASFE member could be committing negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation.
IIGER06045.0M
I
3, 8/9/2007 3:27:46 PV, wrnlewis, KIP.pc3 2006 pc3, 18
S \projects\2006 P,ojects\06-022 Do'. -Tekie Fo,nun, P
.1
I!
1
1
1
5
1
ORy af Tukwila
6300Department of Ccavnurdty Southard', B j1s d. TWn*q WA Ma
Tdephane (208) 431-3670 FAX (208) 431-3685
E-maR hil amu"
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER
L06-074
SCALE IN FEET
40 20 0 40
1'040'
BO
WASHINGTON STATE PLANE, NOR1H ZONE
PER WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF COUNTY SURVEYORS d KING
COUNTY CONTROL SURVEY
BASIS OF BEARINGS
BASED UPON TIE MONUMENTED WEST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10-239-040.
BEARING N01'44'34'E
J
30'
I I 5
E•
7
SECTION CORNER VISITED
ICTICN CORNER CALCULATED POSITION
SECTION QUARTER CORNER 1191ED
SECTION QUARTER CALCULATED P091I0N
MUM) MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED
CALCULATED MONUMENT P09110N
FOUND AS DESCRIBED
SET 5/8' REBAR & CAP, LS. 29287
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
MEASURED
CALCULATED
PLAT Cr R1VER0DE INTERURBAN TRACTS, WL 10, PG. 74
RECORD OF 91RVEY, VOL 5, PG 171
RECORD OF SURVEY, VOL 75, PC. 149
KING COUNTY CONTROL SURVEY
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY
MAP FOR SR 599, FOSTER INTERCHANGE TO SOUTH 11816 ST.
APPROVED SEPT 4, 1983, DRAWER 56, SEQUENCE 20
i
S8917'39•E 391.05'
220.00'
8
.9
10
S. 126TH STREET
(ANDER s1EEEl)
Ll
A,
`.D4
99.05' .`
CO 52' 294.79'
L }J
I N8917391'1
NLPRIVATE 5' 118.00'
a 1bl
Im REG a 2070725001 90 REwsEO
EASEMENT
j 1 PARCEL •A'
I "Ilk
8,909 S.F.
E 4:1,6.0 S 0.205 AC.
I
00d- c N891739•111118.00'
jou
P
20'
20 I
FOUND 1/2' REBAR W/CAP
55935'01 1.98'8 FMN
CALCULATED POSITION
VISITED 5/1/'2008.
CTAUDACNER•
ROBERT M +
TALEVIC
734060 0664
t—RELOCATED
,LOT LINES
PARCEL N0.
734060 0661
0
z
10' PRIVATE
— STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
REG 60. 20070.125001690.
P AR114
LEL A'
REVISED
PARCEL 'B'
38.255 S.F.
0.832 AC.
1
N8917'391W 380.01'
PARCEL 0.63.
734060 0662
y
WEST END WOOD
FENCE 1.4'5 OF UNE
14'
r
J.
VOLUME PAGE —
CENTERLINE, 40'
EASEMENT FCR ammo
TRANSMISSION AND
DISTRIBUTION FOR CITY OF `
SEAMS REG NO. ]�
—0 7905111015 "0
allAN
1.7
4 „\ itkkh
t.r:Vita
• 50113'04'W
10.77' 4
HEMENVAY
PHILIP
734060 0663
I ANGLE PONT MOD
FENCE 0.9'5 & 0.3'W
I 0- CORNER
HEOENVAY
PHILIP
TRACT 45 734060 0665
RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRICTS
VOL. 10, PG. 74 1
KENNETH R. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
Surveying. Mapping and Land Planning
1720 South 3411t Ram SLlte 0-4
Federal Wa8 Woehtrptm 9800.3
Da Mina (253) 838-1199
TP (253) 272-9658
FAX (253) 838-8184
E mdOmdenwwMlon.mm
9/24/07
54
HEMENVAY
VAY
DANIEL
734060 0681
(9� C BUILDERS
ONSTER ROAD, SUITE 330
4P: RENTON, WA 98055
• (425).A35-8800
DRAWN BY
WEL
CHECKED BY
KRA
DATE
SCALE
VSfA11101
PER WSDOT
10112[2008
1•a4o'
JOB NUMBER
SHEET
06-022
3 DF 3
City of Tukwila
Department 6300 Soutfxmter� Boulevard, Community u Development4 WA 98188
ETelephone -m(o) (406) 431-3665
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-074
ORONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:
(PER STEWART TITLE SUBDINSION GUARANTEE N0. 5G-2631-12037. ORDER N0. 206140531, DATED 9/08/06)
PARCEL •A•
1HE NEST 200 FEET OF THE NORTH 132.5 FEET OF TRACT 45, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS PAGES) 74, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGION.
EARGELL
THE NORTH 132.5 FEET OF TRACT 45, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLA1S, PAGE(S) 74, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
EXCEPT THE %EST 200 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR STATE HIGHWAY UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE NUMBER 647372.
REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:
PARCEL •A•
THE SOUTH 75.00 FEET OF THE WEST 118.03 FEET OF THE NORTH 132.5 FEET OF TRACT 45, RIVERSIDE
INTERURBAN TRACTS. =OWING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDS 3F KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 'EXCEPT %EST�FETT THEREOF; AND EXCEIN VOLUME ID OF PT THAA�T�PORTION
THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR STATE HIGHWAY UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 647372
SITUATE IN 10140 COUNTY, STATE OF WA0UNGTON.
PARCEL 'B•
NORTH 132.5 FEET OF TRACT 45, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S') 74, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXCEPT THE
WEST 2D0 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT POROGH THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR STATE HIGHWAY UNDER
KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 647372;
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 75.00 FEET OF THE %EST 118.00 FEET THEREOF;
SITUATE IN KING COUNTY. STATE OF WASHINGTON.
KENNETH R. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Surveying, Mapping and Land Planning
1720 South 341st Place, gate C-4
Federal Way; WalhtrpWi 98003
Oa, Maine (253) 838-1199
Tacoma FAX (25)838�8164�
E-11olt mdOvd.,ouemeyxecam
7
CRAM BY
9 4 '7
C BUILDERS
ONSTER ROAD, SUITE 3.30
P. RENTON, WA 98055
(425) 235-6600
CHECiIED BY
WEL
KRA
DAZE
SCALE
VOLUME PAGE
10/12/2006
N/A
JOB NUMBER
SHEET
06-022
2 aF 3
I
KIP.pc3 2006.pc3, 18x24i
0
N
0
m
o
0
02
N
CO
0
r
0
0
a
i;
0
a.
c
f
0
0
0
0
0
00
4
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail: tukplanOtukwlla.wa.us
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-074
DECLARATION:
i 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT THAT WE. THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OF
THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT. THE
UNDERSIGNED FURTHER DECLARE THIS BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC
REPRESENTATION OF SAID BOUNDARY UNE_ADJUSTMENT-AND THE -SAME IS SDE WITH THE
FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE -WITH THE DESIRE OF THE
j IN WITNESS WHEREOF TME HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS.
NAME
GAME
NAME
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED' BEFORE ME
TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT
'AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE/SHE SIGNED THE SAME AS HIS/HER VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED
FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. THISDAY OFA == 20_
SIGNATURE
NAME AS COMMISSIONED:
WILE:
MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:
NAME
STATE OF WASHINGTON._-.....
COUNTY OFKING-
ON THIS DAY'
PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME
TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE INDMDUAL WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT
ie AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE/SHE SIGNED THE SAME AS HIS/HER VOLUNTARY ACT AND
_ DEM, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSESTHEREIN MENTIONED.
• GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF 20
m
SIGNATURE
NAME AS COMMISSIONED:
TITLE:
MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES
LAND SURVEYOR'S' CERTIFICATE -- — _.
14. 1 KENNETH R. ANDERSON. REGISTERED AS A LAND SURVEYOR BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,
CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN,
8- CONDUCTED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVIS0N; THAT THE DISTANCES, COURSES AND ANGLES
J, ARE SHOWN HEREON CORRECTLY; AND THAT MONUMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE MONUMENTS 1
. APPROVED FOR SETTING AT A LATER DATE, HAVE BEEN SET AND LOT CORNERS STAKED ON
S THE GROUND AS DEPICTED ON THE PLAT.
KENNETH R. ANDESON P.LS. - .... CERTIFICATE NO. 29267
g KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL
EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS 1}9S
DAY CF 20
i
i
1 TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL:
I
RENEWED AND APPROVED BY THE SHORT SUBDIN90N COMMITTEE AND HEREBY MIMED FOR RUNG
ITHIS DAY ff 20
u
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY ASSESSOR
PARCEL. NUMBER(S)
QWRPERSON, SHORT SUBDMSION COMMITTEE
FOUND MONUMENT -�,� 3
(KCCS - GDID /3.000)
6' BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE, 9 \10
WITH '+' & STAMPED '1976
K.C.', MARKED WITH SECTION,
TOWNSHIP & RANGE INFORMATION
VISITED 4/16/06
13
_Z ,^
�3YO'
m. b
m �
FOUND MONUMENT
(KCCS GRID p340)
3' BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE,
'ATH PUNCH PARK & 'DAVID
EVANS & ASSOC.' '1890
FLUSH
VISITED 4/17/06
CALCULATED S.W.
SECTION CORNER
PER KCCS GDID #3444
SECTION CORNER VISITED
SECTION CORNER CALCULATED POSITION
SECTION QUARTER CORNER VISITED
SECTION QUARTER CALCULATED POSITION
FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED
CALCULATED MONUMENT POSITION
FOUND AS DESCRIBED
SET 5/8' REBAR & CAP, LS. 29287
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
MEASURED
CALCULATED
PLAT OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, VOL. 10, PG 74
RECORD OF SURVEY, VOL 5, PC. 171
RECORD OF SURVEY, VOL 75, PG. 149
TONG cONTY CONTROL SURVEY
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY
MAP FOR SR 599, FOSTER INTERCHANGE TO SOUTH 1181H ST.
APPROVED SEPT 4, 1963, DRAWER 58, SEQUENCE 20
ve
S8916'04'E 2135.93'
)/"--
1614.431C) 1614.90'(P1)- 377.20'(P1XC) —
Z
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
NO EVIDENCE OF
PERMANENT MARKINGS, IS
FILLED WITH CONCRETE,
USED APPARENT
INDENTATION,
VISITED 4/16/06 .toh
70'39'351C) \ J'
7038'(P1)
cn
71
S89'1739'E
1774.59'(C)
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
3' BRASS DISK WITH
PUNCH MARK & 'KING CO.'
IN CONCRETE, 0.5' DOWN
VISITED 4/16/06
CALCULATED PER (R1)
YULUMt
t'At0
CALCULATED
PER (R1)
VICINITY MAP
SCALE 1'=1/4 MILE
1.A
i
_S. 1261)1 ST..
seg
lv
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
3' BRASS DISK WITH X & 'KONG
CO'.IN CONCRETE, 0.3' DOWN
VISITED 4/16/06
N89134 39'W 2638.57
/
4'CALCULATED &
PER /4 KCCS GRID 1#3443
15
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
SPIKE OR LEAD IN STONE IN CONC.
CENTERLINEOFE MARGINAL WAY S.-�f
FOUND MONUMENT 04 CASE
PIN 94 CONCRETE, 0.5' DOWN,
37TH AVE S. & S. 130TH
VISITED 5/8/06
N
SURVEY IN THE
SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
SEC. 10, 123N., R04E., W.M.,
IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTCN
RECORDING CERTIFICATE
FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST Cf THE CITY OF TUKWIA THIS
DAY OF 20 AT MINUTES PAST
�K AND RECCtWED N VOLUME DF SURVEYS.
ON PAGE RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON.
KENNETH R.
AND ASSOCIATES
Surveying, Mapping and Land
1720 South 341,1 Place, Suite C-4
Federal Way, Waehhgtan 98003
Dee Mabee (253) 838-1199
Thema (253) 272-9858
FAX (253) 638-8164
E—Mat malSandarn wrvev1 n
ANDERSON
. INC.
Planning
S86 -2216'W z
76.70'(C)
CALCULATED CEVIERIJNE INTERSECTION
5.44'N & 5.7 C) 5.43'N & 5.77'E(R2
FROM M "`
FOUND MONUMENT INCASE y f
r" BRASS -DISK 11TH X IN
CONCRETE, 0.4' DOWN, INTERSECTION
OF E. MARGINAL WAY & S. 1301H Si.
VISITED 5/8/06
CONTROL DIAGRAM
SCALE 1%400'
r1
NAD8.3/91
WASHINGTON STATE PLANE NORTH ZONE
PER WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF COUNTY SURVEYORS & KING
COUNTY CONTROL SW
1,-/\ BASIS OF BEARINGS:
BASED UPON THE MONUMENIED WEST UNE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC110N 10 -23N -04E.
BEARING: N01'44'34'E
A.lESTIC BUILDERS
MONSTER ROAD, SUITE 330
/ZIP: RENTON, WA 98055
ONE44425) 235-6600
CHECKED BY
RECrrvro
CITY p
(AUG 10 ?ilfi7
DATE
10/12/2006
JOB NUMBER
SKEET
06-022
!ILA,
Oty of Rada
0opa1menl of Community Development
6300 SOuthcenta Boulecrd, Ureic, WA 98188
Eek (206) 431-3670 1 (208) 431-3665
BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER
L06-074
SCALE IN FEET
20 0 40
1'_40
80
WASHINGTON STATE RUNE. NORTH ZOFE
PER WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF COUNTY SURVEYORS & ICING
COUNTY CONTROL 9IHVEY
RASLS OF BEARINGS:
BASED UPON 114E MONLIIMENTED T6 ST UNE OF THE
NCR/WEST C2UARTO1 OF SECTION 10-294-016.
BEARING /81114'34'E
8
1
1?
J
5
LE ID
r
•
O
(M)
(C)
(P)
(91)
(R2)
Oats)
(01St 01)
SECTION CORNER VISITED
5EC1106 CORNER CALCULATED P0511104
SECTION QUARTER CORNER VISITED
SECTION QUARTER CALCULATED P09TIa
FOl1NO MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED
CALCULATED MONUMENT PC9110N
FOUND AS DESCRIBED
SET 3/6' REBAR & CAP, LS 29267
UNLESS 011469015E NOTED
MEASURED
CALCULATED
PLAT CF RIVER570E INTERURBAN TRACTS VOL 12, PG 74
RECCRO OF SURVEY, VOL 5, PG 171
RECORD OF SURVEY, VOL 75, PG 149
KING COUNTY'CONRR%. SURVEY
WA94NCTON STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION RICHT-7-WAY
MAP FOR SR 599, FOSTER NTERCHANtE TO SOUTH 11891 5T.
APWNOVED SEPT 4. 1963, DRAWER 56. SFOIENOE 20
A
1
S891 7.39 -E 319.05' Qi
220.00
5.
VOLUME _ PAGE -
AMENDED BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT A
THIS IS A RE-RECORDING OF CITY OF TUKWI A BOUNDARY 114E ADJUSTMENT MISER L06-074, RECORDED DI VOLUME
236, PAGE'S 27-29, RECORDS OF 1•40 COUNTY RECORDING N0. 20071128900018, FOR THE FOUOVANG 16149015.
94567 1 OF 3: EDIT REFERENCE INFORMATION FCR THE W. LUNE & ADO 196EN9d4 OF N. LINE OF 114E SW. QUARTER OF
SEC. 10-236-4E. CORRECT SPELLING ERRORS. NOV OWNER94W INFORMATION
946(7 2 OF 3: CORRECT THE REVISED LEGAL OESCR1P110N5 OF PARCELS 'A' MO Y. NEW 0161ER99P INFORMATION
SHEET 3 OF 3: CORRECT CENTERTINE OINEN9014 OF S 1261)1 ST. HEW 0586ER90P INFORMATION
126TH STREET `,�
(INNER MEV)
-J
99.05"
F `
N8917'3911
WATER IVATEASE6ENT 118.00"
8 IP 8E0. 60. 20070725001690
JR1 REVISED
r , h , PARCEL ''
g
�r1 c°c ore A
8 909 S.F.
L E goo •o" 0.205 AC.
L -- 1
r20
20 I
o
FODO 1fY REBAR Si/CAP
MARKED "4ARSTA0 16/13731,
S593001'11, 1.96' FROM
CALCULATED P09110N
VISITED 5/1/2004
294.79'
(-RELOCATED
LOT LINES
PARCEL NO.
734060 0661
N8917'39'W 11800'
O
STAUOACHEP-
ROBEP.T 14.
TALEVIC
734060 0664
—o
W ?lt'Yi!APt',�
$ Q�?,,cC
REVISED
PARCEL 'B'
36,255 SF.
0.832 AC.
N8917'39'9 380.01'
PARCEL NO.
734060 0661:
Up1G1NA1-
ARCEL
WEST ENO 0000
FENCE 1.4S OF 1.I70
14'
5
•
\
N
C •
r
r
CENTERLINE, 40'
EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC
TRANSIASSIGN AND
01S1RIBUTION FOR CITY OF
SEATTLE REG N0.
---\ 7905111015
IP 0
A1,
A
d?.A tp
.,dtn
Aj
iJ
3\ \ •p
601'03'04'W17,
16' 10.77'
10' PRIVATE
— STORM DRAG. EAS7,iFR T
REG 60. 2007072500169E
HENENVAY
PHILIP
734060 0663
61401.0 PONT V1000J
FENCE 0.95 & 0.3'W—"
OF CORNER
HENENVAY
PHILIP
TRACT 45 734060 0665
RIVET SIBE INTERURBAN TRACTS
VOL. 10, PG. 74
KENNETH R. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Surveying, Mapping and Land Planning
1720 South 34131 Race, Silt. 0-4
(Wed Way. W>irglm soma
Deg Moan (253) 536-1199
Tanana (253) 272-9858
FAX (253) 836-6164
E-Lb6 mei,nd.rwenwprecan
V3
HENENVAY
DANIEL
734060 0681
OWNER(S): VIKING BANK Q
ADDRESS 5701 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH
CITY/STATE/ZIP: SEATTLE. WA 98108
PHONE (206) 768-1088
DRAWN 87
O4EOCED BY
WEL
KRA
DATE
LSTAIO41EB
PER IMOT
10108/2008
1'=40'
MAR 05 2009'
CD".S.i, 11J.j
13E:1F3.01',414.141
06-022
DF
City of Tukwila
Dapartmalt oI Cammunity Deodapmalt
8300 Sa dhentr Boulevard, Tukwila. WA 9818E
Tdephane (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E -mal: tulsokalularigazia
BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-074
MINX LEGAL DE5CRTP110NS:
(PER STEWART DIE SIMONSON GUARANTEE NO. SG -2631-12037. ORDER NO. 206140531. DATED 9/08/06)
PARCEL
THE PEST 200 FEET OF THE NORM 132.5 FEET OF TRACT 45, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 74. RECORDS Cf KING COUNTY, WASMINGION.
PEEL &
THE NORM 132.5 FEET OF TRACT 45, I84FRS10E INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED 91 VOJM 10 OF PLATS PACE(S) 74, RECORDS OF K1IG COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
DWI THE WEST 200 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR STATE HIGIWAY UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE MAW 647372.
PARCEL 'A'
THE SOUTH 75.50 FEET OF THE WEST 115.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 132.5 FEET OF TRACT 45. RIVERSIDE
INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING 10 THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED N VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(5) 74,
RECORDS OF KONG COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
SITUATE 91 TONG COUNTY. STATE OF WASHINGTOFL
EARMLXNCIRTH OF TRACT 45. FWD/SIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS. ACCORDING TO NE PUT THEREOF
RECCROED DI ROME 10 OF RATS. PAGE(S) 74. RECORDS OF 14940 COUNTY. WASHOIG10N;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR STATE HIGHWAY UNDER KONG COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE WOOL 647372;
DCEPT THE SOUTH 75.50 FEET OF THE VEST 113.00 FEET THEREOF:
SITUATE 4 IOW COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
AMENDED BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 0
1)4I;IS A RE-RECORDING OF OTT CF TUKYM.A BOUNDARY UNE ADJJS1YENT NUMBER L06-074, RECORDED 94 40Ug1E
236 PAGE'S 27-29. RECORDS OF KONG COUNTY, RECORDING NO. 20071128900018. FOR THE FOLLOWING REVISONS.
SHEET 1 OF 3: EDIT REFERENCE INFORMATION FOR THE W. UNE & A00 DIMENSION OF 14. UNE CF THE 5W. QUARTER OF
SEC 10-2314-4E CORRECT SPEUING ERRORS NEW OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
SHEET 2 OF 3: CORRECT THE REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PARCELS 'A' AND '9'. NEW OWNERSHIP INFORMA11a
SHEET 3 OF J: CORRECT CENIERUNE DIMENSON OF S 1261)4 ST. NEW OVRIERSNIP INFORMATION
LI)+hoot,
KENNETH R. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
Surveying, Mapping and Land Planning
1720 Seth 341st Place. Sults C-4
Federd Way, WaahL.glnn 99083
Oa Mims (253) 836-1199
Tacoma (253) 272-9858
FAX (253) 538-6164
E -Mak manaldrreanaa ,!cam
OWNERS): VIKING BANK 0
ADDRESS:. 5701 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH
CITY/STATE/ZIP: SEATTLE, WA 98108
PHONE: (206) 768-1088
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
DATE
1r 08 2008
.178 NUI48ER
SUIT
WAR 0 5 2009
CCiM:vJn.1 (
r; -r r
n i
Awrail
3101.
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Tukwila. WA 98188
Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail: tukolanOtukwila.wa.us
AMENDED BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 0
NIS IS A RE-RECORDING OF OTY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LIM :'., RECORDED IN VOLUME
236, PAGES 27-29, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. RECORDING NO. 20011128900016 FOR ' !:LOWING REVISIONS,
SLEET 1 OF 3: EDIT REFERENCE INFORMATION FOR 111E W. UNE di ALO 014EN50N OF N. hl .1' THE SW. QUARTER OF
SEG 10 -23N -4E. CORRECT SPELLING CRRORS NCw OWNCROUP word/Arm
SHEET 2 OF 3: CORRECT THE REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PARCELS AND V. h . ; .ICRSHIf iNrORMATION
SHEET 3 OF 3: CORRECT CENTERLINE DIIAENSON OF S. 126Th 5T. NEW OWNEQSIIP INFIXv
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER L06-074
DECLARATION:
KNOW AU. MEN BY NESE PRESENT THAT WE. THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNER(S) IN FEE STAPLE OF
THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT. THE
UNDERSGNED FURTHER DECLARE THIS BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC
REPRESENTATION OF SAID BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT AND THE SAME IS MADE WITH THE
FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRE OF THE OWNER(S).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS.
VIKING BANK Qi
BY: CHRIS CLOU9
ITS VICE PRESIDENT
STATE OF WASIINCTON
COUNTY OF LONG
I CERMET' THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT CHRIS QDU44G IS THE PERSON WHO
APPEARED BEFORE ME, AND SAKI PERSON AO040 .ED ED THAT HE SIGNED THIS IMMINENT, ON OATH STATED
THAT ME WAS AUTHORIZED 70 DEOU1E TFff INSTRUMENT AND AOOVOMtWGED IT AS TME WOE PRESDENT OF
SOONG BANK 10 8E INE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED
IN THE BSIRUMENT.
DATED: Oc a 17 2. to 4
}
(SOt+A1URE)
TITLE
r . .
MY APPOPITMENT EPIRES ,,. _ '
LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: Ot
I KENNETH R. ANDERSON. REGISTERED AS A LAND SURVEYOR BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,
CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN,
CONDUCTED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION: THAT THE DISTANCES. COURSES AND ANGLES
ARE SN01V1J NCORRECTLY: AND THAT MONUMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE MONUMENTS
APPROVED F. TONG AT, OII TER D TE, HAVE BEEN SET AND LOT CORNERS STAKED ON
SIS. ' A5 DyNCTED, •`A E P
Zit zoo4
P.L. CERTIFI TE N.. 29267
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL
EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY DIE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS 11.5 I Ck
DAY OF •-106 ilM\. 20 C't
`xo -k 4061i 114.7.• .
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR O0PITY
PARCEL NUM8FR(5)..340(-C C(cdt^ 1 0(+2
TUKWILA SHORT SUBOIVISON COMMITTEE APPROVAL:
REVIVED AND APPROVED BY TME SHORT BODA9O1 COMIaTTEE AND HEREBY CFRTIRED FOR RUNG
7195 . 3 4' Y OF LO. 20 _
FOUND MONUMENT -•-
(KCCS - G010 #3500)
6' BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE,
WITH '+" & STAMPED "1976
K.C.', MARKED `MTh SECTION.
TOWNSHIP & RANGE INFORMATION
V151TE0 4/16/06
FOUND MONUMENT
(KCCS GOLD p340)
3' BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE.
WITH PUNCH PARK & 'DAVID
EVANS & ASSOC." "1890'
FLUSH
VISITED 4/17/06
9 10
CALCULATED S.W.
SECTION CORNER
PER KCCS GDID./3444
$
;„7-,
LE ND:
mime
as.0.41
O
0
•
(M)
(C)
(P1)
(R1)
(R2)
(Kccs)
(w00
SECTION CORNER V19160
SECTION CORNER CALCULATED POSITION
SECTION QUARTER CORNER VISITED
SECTION QUARTER CALCULATED P09110N
FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED
CALCULATED MONUMENT P09110N
FOUND AS DESCRIBED
SET 5/8' REBAR & CAP. LS. 29267
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
MEASURED
CALCULATED
PLAT OF RIVERSIDE WTERUR9AN TRACTS, VOL 10, PC. 74
RECORD OF SURVEY. VOL 5, PC. 171
RECORD DF SURVEY. VOL. 75, PG 149
KING COUNTY CONTROL SURVEY
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT -Cf -WAY
MAP FOR SR 599, FOSTER INTERCHANGE TO SOUTH 1181)4 ST.
APPROVED SEPT 4, 1963. DRAWER 56. 5EOUDICE 20
Qom. 1 630.47'
2135 93
SB9S8916'041m 1614.90'(P1) ` 37
7.20'(Pixc) —
N
�4.
16
10
15
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
NO EVIDENCE OF
PERMANENT MARKINGS, IS
HUED WITH CONCRETE,
USED APPARENT
INDENTATION,
VISITED 4/16/06
8:^(t
tr
70'39'351c) \ A1
70'380P1) -{
58917'39"E
1774.59'(C)
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
3' BRASS DISK WITH
PUNCH MARK & TONG CO."
IN CONCRETE, 0.5' DOWN
1A51TED 4/16/06
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
3' BRASS DISK 51TH "X" & "KONG
CO.' IN CONCRETE. 0.3" DOWN
VISITED 4/16/06
CALCULATED PER (R1);/ I
pa ,/
$ 4
A ..i
VOLUME PAGE
CALMLATIED
PER (R1)
c- 2
24.80'1
T1(P1XC) 9, -5?
7117
1
N89'04 39.V1 2638.57
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
SPIKE OR LEAD IN STONE Al CONC. it
CENTERUNE OF E MARGINAL WAY S.
VISITED 5/8/06
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
vIN IN CONCRETE, 0.5' DOWN,
37111 AVE S. & 5. 130TH ST:
LASTED 5/8/06
I Zlll�7-00B
bi
S86'2218'W g
776.70'(C)
N86'44'53"E
I
I
I I
I I 1 \
CALCULATED S. 1/4 CORNER
PER KCCS ( /3443
15
CALCULATED CENTERUNE INTERSECTION
'2' 5ROµ1N 0► 5.76T(C)
.76 (C) 5.43'N & 5.77E(R2)
FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE
3" BRASS DISK 18TH "X' IN
CONCRETE, 0.4' DOWN, INTERSECTION
OF E. MARGINAL WAY & S. 130TH ST.
VISITED 5/8/06
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1'41/4 MILE
CALCULATED
PER (*5001)-)
CONTROL DIAGRAM
SCALE 1"=200'
WASHINGTON STATE PI WE NORTH 2CNE
PER WASHINGTON COUNOL OF COUNTY SURVEYORS k KING
COUNTY CONTROL SURVEY
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
BASED UPON TIC 11096111ENIED WEST LUNE CF Tiff
NORTHWEST QUARTER 0< SECTION 10-231-04E.
BEARING N01'44'34'E
SURVEY IN THE
SE 1/4 OF 1HE SW 1/4
SEG 10, T2.14., RO4E., W.M..
IN KING COUNTY.
WA9'IINGTON
OXFORD COPY
20090219900004
KENNETN R FINN IMAM 118.00
P80E001 OF 003
/9/ /22� 12:000
KENNETH R. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Surveying, Mapping and Land Planning
1720 South 341st Plate, Suit. C-4
Fedrd Wey, Washington 98003
Des Main (253) 838-1199
Tagima (253) 272-9858
FAX (353) 638-8164
OWNER(S): VIKING BANK
ADDRESS: 5701 FORST AVENUE SOUTH
CITY/STATE/ZIP: SEATTLE, WA 98108
PHONE: (206) 768-1086
t ...7r1
p4AR 0 5 ?009
CD1Au,Jf
DEVELOPai
DRAWN 8Y
WEL
DATE
10/08/2008
308 14138808
06-022