The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIC 2018-08-13 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Transportation and Infrastructure Committee • • • • • • Thomas McLeod, Chair De'Sean Quinn Zak Idan AGENDA MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 2018 Distribution: T. McLeod D. Quinn Z. Idan V. Seal D. Robertson Mayor Ekberg D. Cline L. Humphrey H. Hash H. Ponnekanti G. Labanara B. Still R. Turpin A. Youn Clerk File Copy 2 Extra Place pkt pdf on Z:\Trans & Infra Agendas e-mail cover to: A. Le, C. O'Flaherty, A. Youn, D. Almberg, B. Saxton, S. Norris, L. Humphrey, T. McLeod 5:30 PM HAZELNUT CONFERENCE ROOM (EAST ENTRANCE OF CITY HALL) Qrnmended Ac ion e� 1. PRESENTATION(S) King County 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a) Green the Green Construction Award b) Green the Green Grant Acceptance c) 2018 Annual Small Drainage Program Bid Award d) King County Metro Community Connections Project Update (DCD) 3. SCATBd/RTC e) • SCATBd June 19, 2018 Meeting Summary • SCATBd July 17, 2018 Meeting Agenda 4. MISCELLANEOUS 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Forward to 8/20/18 Regular Consent Agenda b) Forward to 8/20/18 Regular Consent Agenda c) Forward to 8/20/18 Regular Consent Agenda d) Information Only e) Information Only Future Agendas: • 2018 Committee Work Plan • Traffic Calming Pg. 1 Pg. 11 Pg. 15 Pg. 17 Pg. 21 Pg. 27 Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, August 27, 2018 I} The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance. Key Policy Choices 1 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 201 orecast much higher than 2016 Forecast O 0 ;I) r‘t. 0 0 0 ;NIrN 0 0 ------ 2018 Forecast o -- Upper Limit - Lower Limit ri s rJ 0 rn 0 2016 Forecast 0 rn 2 2 Com•arison of Long Term Dis•osal 0•tions $41 $172 $9.20 (131,000) MTCO2e 95,000 MTCO2e/year No change SEPA, Permitting $55 $182 $9.30 (77,000) MTCO2e 95,000 MTCO2e/year No change Rail Capacity, Control $136 $230 $11.31 12,000 to 80,000 MTCO2e 1,200,000 MTCO2e/year 2% increase Siting, Sizing on Terir ► s osa Cedar Hills Advant , es �- 10west Rate Impact ost'Favorable GNG Ianaes 1 :'roteLcaiiy -- Maintains System Control -- Lowest Experience Risk Anticipate City aupport Export -- Rail Capacit t ,Risks -- H'her Rate impact ..asteJ,t Energy Highest Rate Impact SLPAsitin Challenges Plant Sizing R sks 33 Tons/Transactions vs Recycling at Stations Houghton is Third Busiest King County Transfer Station 2017 Tons and Transactions Vashon Vial 20,013 7,674 Enumclaw *Oita 53,6°1 24,169 Shoreline imaNwilimatk 101,013 1 57,619 "C. 2 Renton ii*Akkittitti 87,456 5 . 64,569 t 110,461 aglite-ualw .-, Factoria n, ,,,WASfanaalatag„,A,,,x4taata* 142,425 Houghton Va‘,s 128,674 154,547 Algona Bow Lake 45,452 154,975 ''1,42151511151r4111gWriMMIO 212,035 a§444, 285,874 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 850,000 0 Transactions 0 Tons Houghton- Collects the Least Amount of Recyclabies of King County Transfer Stations that Coilect Recyclables 2017 Recycling Tons Algona 0 Factoria 706 0 Renton 3numdaw ILE Vachon Bow Lake 721 2,230 2,306 8,209 5,938 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 Tons 4 4 Full Service Station Costs More But Offers Greatest Flexibility And Fnyironmpntl Rpnpfits Al"Itn( ?MN" eti*it 140, • .",eN*0404CVNANW's*".W1 $2.39 00004$a #140404 (2,165 MTCO2e) Emergency Storage 3 Recyclable Materials Limited Recycling Little Flexibility For The Future Host City Opposition 4UMTAtkmA0. .1,44010.$3.0 Irjftiar"47: AWKAStkike" (32,098 MTCO2e) nom.4.moa 44A0#004mL roNro***, IMO*404.6 • Daily Tonnage Capacity • • Vehicle Capacity • • Compaction • Recycling • Time On Site • • Emergency Storage • 8+ Recyclable Materials • Station Siting May Take • Time And Be Costly • Potential Host City Opposition • $9.79 (28,802 MTCO2e) Daily Tonnage Capacity Vehicle Capacity €efivac-t-ieR• Reeyekt Time On Site errreretxp-Stetege 6 Recyclable Materials Limited Recycling Less Future Flexibility Siting Can Take Time Potential Host City Opposition NERTS is Best Choice for Environment, Equity & KRIS Advantages ..,": — Addresses Regional Inequities — Siting Challenges Multiplied Maximizes Service Offering — See Houghton "As -Is" Issues Most Favorable GHG • Houghton "As -Is" ervice IVIost Cities Support Approach Consistent with Long Standing Regional Plan .MihihiaffZeCyCling— Low Operational Efficiency HOSt..pity'.Concerns KingCounty Dettarmenz Natural Resolect$.4116Porio Sand WAsto 011,201.0 55 Region 't Rethink Our Own Recycling Policy Ci have been asking fc r menu of choices for r cyc ing policies. his i oow inn question given the resource con on ` f has challenged global m r ets "" ishful Rec clin „ l vu hask forces are r iri King Counfy and across the Sfate fo p sue more un led approaches. �60 400 -- King County Department or Natural fiwburtbs and Parks SOW Waste Division 90 `1905 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010,20 .. 2012 20 2014 2015 Regio .al Recycling Rats 6 6 Develop environmental impact statement (DEIS ) Jan -Dec 2017 Discuss with Advisory Committees: Oct 2016 - Nov 2017 City adoption process: Late 2018 - 2019 60-day public comment on draft Plan & DEIS: Jan 8- Mar 8, County Council adoption process: starts mid 2018 Preliminary state review : January 8 - May 7, 2018 2019/20 Rate Proposal • Proposed increase Less than inflation Less than previously forecasted Funds increased cost of service and upkeep of aging infrastructure -- Funds Comp Plan implementation Introduces Low Income Rate Pilot Proposed Rate Would Keep County in the Mid - Range of Regional Service Providers $180.00 $160.00 $140.00 $120.00 $100,00 580.00 $60.00 540.00 S20.00 $0.00 Snohomish Thurston County King County County proposed Count,: Seat; le websites, accesses Mz.,rch IS, 2010. Seattle Pierce County County Decision Making Tothe County Council on June 28, 201 County must approve rates by the end of September to meet advance notice requirenients for WA Utilities and Transportation Commission and partner cities fective Date: January 1, 2019 8 8 King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Solid Waste Division Resource- Was rn Recovery E ispo King stye t center oh; UeoL Suit eattle+ WA 98 „08-3858' 205-47T, k66 7 Tip' Re(ay .k i nty. ov/sohdv 'sta King County D p rth`tent of N atural k000urces and Parks S olid Wasta ulvlslan 9 10 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFOR ATIONAL E ORANDU TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Henry Hash, Public Works Director 4 BY: Mike Perfetti, Habitat Project Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 10, 2018 SUBJECT: Surface Water Fund - Green the Green Project No. 91641202 Construction Award ISSUE Award the contract for construction of the Green the Green Project. BACKGROUND The City's Green the Green Project will restore sections of the Green/Duwamish River for the purposes of providing shade, improving water quality and habitat for ESA -listed Puget Sound chinook salmon and other aquatic species, as well as enhance the shoreline for the enjoyment of the community. This pilot public -private partnership will restore shorelines at 14900 Interurban Ave S (JSH site) and 17035 West Valley Hwy (NC Machinery/Harnish Group site). DISCUSSION The Green the Green Project was advertised for quotes on July 19, 2018. Three responsive quotes and one non -responsive quote were received via e-mail and opened on July 31, 2018. The quotes were checked, corrected, and tabulated. Applied Ecology, LLC submitted the apparent low responsive quote at $132,634.70. The Engineer's estimate was $114,257.52. References were checked, and no debarment has been issued against Ecology, LLC according to WA State Labor and Industries. The overall quote is more than the Engineer's estimate but is within the current budget. The anticipated project schedule is from Fall 2018 to Spring 2021 in order to include a one year of plant maintenance. FISCAL IMPACT (All amounts include sales tax.) The Green the Green Project has Surface Water construction funds budgeted in 2018, 2019, and 2020 for a total of $150,000. Funding includes two King County Flood Control District grants, one having a $44,518.95 balance and a second grant was just awarded for $50,000. Construction Eng. Estimate Budget Applied Ecology, LLC contract $132,634.70 $114,257.52 $150,000.00 Contingency (10%) 13 263.47 11 425.75 .00 Total $145,898.17 $125,683.27 $150,000.00 RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to award the construction of the Green the Green Project to Applied Ecology, LLC. in the amount of $132,634.70 and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the August 20, 2018 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Proposed 2019-2024 CIP pg. 107 Quote Tabulation RIPW Eng \ PROJECTSIA- DR Projects\Green the GreenEsid1Info Memo_Construction Award_20180810-sm.docx 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT: Green the Green Project No. 91641202 DESCRIPTION: Interdepartmental ofo�pr ovide �Gr eentributaries � |nnertopmv�eehade ' . � and cooler water temperatures tothreatened salmon and oteelhead. JUSTIFICATION: WRIA 9 has identified warm water temperatures as an impediment to salmon recovery, and has also started a funding program called, "ReGreen the Green" which aims to support revegetation projects along the river. STATUS: � Project sites have been identified. Other planting opportunities are ide ntified �ve��behwaonPob|icVVurkoandDCD. MA|NT IMPACT: Expected b,increase maintenance. COMMENT: Proposed grant funding is from VYRIA8King County Flood Control District and others. FINANCIAL Through Estimated 3 EXPENSES � Design 14 20 20 20 25 25 25 30 179 Land(R8W) U Monitoring 20 20 50 30 40 40 180 Conat. MgmL 1 5 15 10 15 10 15 10 10 91 Construction 15 OO 67 50 50 50 50 50 400 TOTAL EXPENSES 15 20 103 117 105 115 120 125 130 850 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant O 44 50 102 Proposed Grant 50 50 50 50 SO 250 Mitigation Actual O Mitigation Expected O City 0per.Revenue 7 20 58 67 55 65 70 75 00 498 TOTAL SOURCES 15 30 103 117 105 115 120 135 130 850 Iss St ~�m r°��°�-� 2019 co2*Capital Improvement Program 107 12 Green the Green CIP Quote Tabulation Contractor Applied Ecology LLC Habitat Restoration Specialists LLC McCann Construction, Inc Transblue LLC 7/31/2018 JSH site (sch A) $45,306.58 $89,990.69 $112,992.00 $82,955.05 Harnish Group site (sch B) $75,270.42 $81,754.89 $112,882.00 $72,396.77 tax (10%) $12,057.70 $17,174.56 $22,587.40 $15,535.18 total quote $132,634.70 $188,920.14 $248,461.40 $170,887.00 signed proposal and submitted addendum references yes yes yes no yes yes yes no w 14 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFOR ATIONAL E ORANDU TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Henry Hash, Public Works Director ////, BY: Mike Perfetti, Habitat Project Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 10, 2018 SUBJECT: Surface Water Fund - Green the Green Project No. 91641202 Grant Acceptance — King County Flood Control District ISSUE Authorize the Mayor to sign a grant agreement with King County Flood Control District through their Cooperative Watershed Management (CWM) grant program. BACKGROUND The City's Green the Green Project will restore sections of the Green/Duwamish River to provide habitat for ESA -listed Puget Sound Chinook salmon and for the enjoyment of the community. This pilot public -private partnership will restore shorelines at 14900 Interurban Ave S (JSH site) and 17035 West Valley Hwy (NC Machinery/Harnish Group site). DISCUSSION King County Flood District, through WRIA 9, issued a Request for Proposals for a grant opportunity called, "Re -Green the Green", which aims to aid salmon recovery by providing shade and decreasing water temperatures. FISCAL IMPACT Staff received approval from this Committee on April 23, 2018 to apply for this grant and was recently awarded the requested amount of $50,000. The CWM grant contributes to the construction budget and will be used for planting and two years of maintenance. There is no City match for the CWM. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to accept the grant agreement for $50,000.00 with King County Flood Control District through their Cooperative Watershed Management Program and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the August 20, 2018 Regular Meeting. W:\PW Eng\ PROJECTS‘A- DR Projects\ Green the Green \ Grants \2018 CWM Grant\Info Memo Grant Accept 08102018-sm.doc 15 16 Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Department - Henry Hash, Director I FOR ATIO AL E ORA DU TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Henry Hash, Public Works Director ////. BY: Ryan Larson, Senior Program Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 10, 2018 SUBJECT: Surface Water Fund - 2018 Annual Small Drainage Program Project No. 91841201 Bid Award ISSUE Award a contract to Ceccanti, Inc. for construction of the 2018 Annual Small Drainage Program. BACKGROUND The Small Drainage Program constructs drainage projects throughout the City that are too large for City staff to complete but are smaller than a typical capital improvement project. The projects originate from citizen complaints and maintenance staff recommendations and are compiled on the Small Drainage Project List. Each year the projects are prioritized based on need, expense, permitting requirements, and length of time on the list. The highest priority projects are then designed and constructed. The 2018 Annual Small Drainage Program was advertised to provide drainage improvements at up to five locations as noted in the attached vicinity map. DISCUSSION The 2018 Annual Small Drainage Program was advertised for bids on July 17 and 24, 2018. Three bids were received and opened on July 31, 2018. The bids were checked, tabulated, and no errors were found. Ceccanti, Inc. is the apparent low bidder with an overall bid of $543,836.40. The engineer's estimate was $491,868.00. FISCAL IMPACT (All amounts include sales tax) The 2018 Small Drainage Program has Surface Water construction funds budgeted at $515,000. Construction management (CM) is budgeted at $80,000, but will be completed by in-house staff, so $35,000 is now being allocated for construction, with the remaining budget available for consultant support. In addition, The King County Flood Control District included $65,378 in their capital budget for the South 180th St Flood Wall Extension, which is part of this 2018 Small Drainage Program. The cost of the flood wall site is eligible for reimbursement based on the bid results, estimated to be $50,000. Bid Results Estimate 2018 Budget Bid Amount (Schedule A & B) $ 543,836.40 $ 491,868.00 $ 515,000.00 Contingency (10%) 54,383.64 Surface Water CM Funds 35,000.00 King County Flood District Funding 50,000.00 Total $ 598,220.04 $ 491,868.00 $ 600 000.00 RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to award the construction contract for the 2018 Annual Small Drainage Program to Ceccanti, Inc. in the amount of $543,836.40 and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the August 20, 2018 Regular Meeting. Attachments: CIP Page 96 Vicinity Map Bid Tabulation WAPW Eng1PR0JECTSIA- OR Projects1Annual Small Drainage ProgramsI2018 SDP (91841201)1Constructiongd Award\Working Docanfo Memo Bid Award 2018.docx 17 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2017 to 2022 PROJECT: Annual Small Drainage Program Project No. 9XX41201 DESCRIPTION: Select, design, and construct small drainage projects throughout the City. JUSTIFICATION: � Provide drainage corrections for existing/ongoing drainage problems throughout the City, including culvert replacements, drain extensions, and pavement upgrades. STATUS: Projects for this annual program are taken from Small Drainage Project List. MAINT|MPAcT Reduces maintenance. COMMENT: Ongoing project, only one year shown in first column. Construction expenses may occur over two calendar plm4mCwL Through Estimated (in*ooV's) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 74 80 OO 80 OO 80 80 OO 80 714 Streomgageo8Mnnimr 10 10 35 55 36 35 36 36 40 274 ConstMgmt. 62 80 nU 88 80 80 80 80 80 702 Construction 255 515 515 515 514 514 514 513 513 4.368 TOTAL EXpsmase 401 sns 710 710 710 710 710 709 713 6,058 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant O Proposed Grant O Mitigation Actual O Mitigation Expected o Utility Revenue 401 085 710 710 710 710 710 709 713 6.058 TOTAL SOURCES 401 oVa 710 rio 710 710 710 run 713 6,058 Project Location: Entire System J \ 2017 2nz2Capital Improvement Program QO 18 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD PIPE ABAN DONMENT INTERURBAN AVE CATCH BASIN RETROFITS GILLIAM CREEK OUTFALL ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS LEVEE 205 DRAINAGE REPAIR CATCH BASIN RETROFIT S 180TH ST BRIDGE RETAINING WALL CATCH BASIN RETROFIT VICINITY MAP 2018 Tukwila Small Drainage Program 19 EXHIBIT 2 - BID TABS CITY OFTUKWILA- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 2018 Small Drainage Program BID TABS 07/31/18 Total Engineer's Estimate Road Construction NW Ceccanti Award Construction No. Section No Item Quantity Unit `Unit Cost Total Cast Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost ROADWAY (SCHEDULE A) 1 1-04 Unexpected Site Changes 1 FA $6,000.00 $ 6,000 $6,000.00 $ 6,000 $6,000.00 $ 6,000 $6,000.00 $ 6,000 2 1-09 Mobilization 1 LS $21,000.00 $ 21,000 $25,000.00 $ 25,000 $30,000.00 $ 30,000 $27,000.00 $ 27000 3 1-10 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS $47,500.00 $ 47,500 $26,000.00 $ 26,000 $30,000.00 $ 30,000 $62,000.00 $ 62,000 4 2-01 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $2,000.00 $ 2,000 $2,200.00 $ 2,200 $5,000.00 $ 5,000 $2,400.00 $ 2 400' 5 8-01 Temporary Water Pollution / Erosion Control 1 LS $8,000.00 $ 8,000 $10,000.00 $' 10,000 $8,700.00 $ 8,700 $11,000.00 $ 11,000 6 8-04 Cement Conc. Traffic Curb and Gutter 130 LF $90.00 $ 11,700 $65.00 $ 8,450 $66.00 $ 8,580 $50.00 $ 6 500 7 8-04 Extruded Curb 150 LF $70.00 $ 10,500 $16.00 $ 2,400 $20.00 $ 3,000 $23.00 $ 3,450 ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT (SCHEDULE A) 8 8-02 Topsoil Type A 20 CY $60.00 $ 1,200 $70.00 $ 1,400 $24.00 $ 480 $63.00 $ 1 260 9 8-02 Seeded Lawn Installation 180 SY $6.00 $ 1,080 $3.30 $ 594 $6.00 $ 1,080 $17.00 $ 3 060 10 8-02 Property Restoration 1 _ FA $4,000.00 $ 4,000 $4,000.00 $ 4,000 $4,000.00 $ 4,000 $4,000,00 $ 4,000 STORM DRAINAGE (SCHEDULE A) 11 7-04 Ductile Iron Storm Sewer Pipe, 12 In. Diam. 140 LF $120.00 $ 16,800 $150.00 $ 21,000 $91.00 $ 12,740 $76.50 $ 10,710 12 7-05 Catch Basin Type 1 1 EA $1,650.00 $ 1,650 $1,300.00 $ 1,300 $1,400.00 $ 1,400 $1,850.00 $ 1,850 13 7-05 Catch Basin Retrofit 43 EA $2,500.00 $ 107,500 $4,000.00 $ 172,000 $3,000.00 $, 129,000 $3,150.00 $ 135,450 14 7-05 Abandon Existing Storm Sewer Manhole & Pipe 1 LS $7,000.00 $ 7,000 $3,000.00 $ 3,000 $45,000.00 $ 45,000 $2,300.00 $ 2 300 Schedule A Total ; 1 $ 245,930.00 $ 283,344.00 $ 284,980.00 �';$ 276,980.00 ROADWAY (SCHEDULE B) ; 15 1-04 Unexpected Site Changes 1 FA $14,000.00 $ 14,000 $14,000.00 $ 14,000 $14,000.00 $ 14,000 $14,000.00 $ 14,000 16 1-09 Mobilization 1 LS $20,000.00 $ 20,000 $25,000.00 $ 25,000 $8,000.00 $ 8,000 $25,000.00 $ 25,000 17 1-10 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS $23,000.00 $ 23,000 $7,000.00 $ 7,000 $2,000.00 $ 2,000 $2,100.00 $ 2,100 18 2-01 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $11,000.00 $ 11,000 $2,200.00 $ 2,200 $3,500.00 $ 3,500 $1,200.00 $ 1,200 19 8-01 Temporary Water Pollution / Erosion Control 1 LS $13,000.00 $ 13,000 $4,000.00 $ 4,000 $5,000.00 $ 5,000 $1,900.00 $ 1,900 ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT (SCHEDULE B) 20 8-02 Topsoil Type A 21 CY $60.00 $ 1,260 $70.00 $ 1,470 $24.00 $ 504 $63.00 $ 1,323 21 8-02 Seeded Lawn Installation 220 SY $6.00 $ 1,320 $3.30 $ 726 $6.00 $ 1,320 $17.00 $ 22 8-02 Property Restoration 1 FA $8,000.00 $ 8,000 $8,000.00 $ 8,000 $8,000.00 $ 8,000 $0,000.00 3,740 $ 8,000 STORM DRAINAGE (SCHEDULE B) 23 7-08 Furnish & Install 18" Diam CIPP for Storm Sewer 1 LS $27,000.00 $ 27,000 $38,000.00 $ 38,000 1 $61,000.00 $ 61,000 '.. r. r r. • 65,000 GILLIAM CREEK OUTFALL ACCESS IMPROVEMENT (SCHEDULER) 24 1 6-20 'Outlet Stair Structure ( 1 I LS ( $60,000.001 $ 60,000 1 $102,000.001 $ 102,000 I $88,000.001 $ 88,000 A $96,000.001 $ 96,000 GILLIAM CREEK OUTFALL ACCESS IMPROVEMENT (SCHEDULE B) 25 1 6-11 Retaining Wall 1 1 j LS $45,000.00 $ 45,000 I $66,000.00j $ 66,000 $44,000.00j $ 44,000 II $50,000.001 $ 50,000 Schedule B Subtotal I $ 223,580.00 $ 268,396 235,324.00 I I $ 268,263.00 Schedule B WSST 10% I $ 22,358.00 ' $ 26,839.60 I $ 23,532.40 I 1 $ 26,826.30 Schedule B Total 245,938.00 1 $ 295,235.60 I $ 258,856.40 I ($ 295,089.30 1 BID TOTAL ® 491,868.00 578,579,60 543,836.40 572,069.30 N City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL E ORANDUM TO: FROM: Jack Pace, Community Development Director Transportation & Infrastructure Committee BY: JaUmni$ Reavis, Senior Planner Najma Hashi, Mayor's Office Intern CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 1W'2018 SUBJECT: Update on King County Metro Community Connections Project in Tukwila ISSUE A staff -level team is working with King County Metro on a Community Connections project to connect Tukwila residents to destinations within the City not served by traditional transit service. BACKGROUND Currently, Tukwila |avery well-connected tzthe regional transit network; however, it's not easy for Tukwila residents to access local destinations. For example, areas including Allentown and Ryan Hill are not well -served by local transit connections. Additionally, many residents who are not within m/g|hing distance to transit and might otherwise drive to acogao transit cannot na|y on being able to find pmrkinQ, as the Tukwila International Boulevard Station (T|RS)8Ud |ntgrU[bgD Avenue South Park & Ride lots fill upeach day early inthe morning. King County Metro's Community Connections Program is dedicated to helping bring mobility services to areas of King County that do not have the infrastructure, density, or land use to support traditional bus service. Several other cities are participating in Metro Community Connections projects, including Normandy Park, Burign and Ooo Moines. The goal ofTukvvi|a'e project is to develop a set of transportation solutions to increase residents' ability to get to where they need togoinoneffective and timely manner. DISCUSSION The first step inthe Tukwila Community Connections project ist000nduotnobuatoomrnun|b/ outreach to identify needs around which local transportation solutions will be tailored. Outreach will be conducted through City-wide surveys oa well as through work with o Stakeholder Working Group. The Stakeholder Work Group will consist ofTukwila residents /and community representatives who will b8asked bzcommit tVapproximately four meetings thatvvi||takep|ooe in Tukwila over the course of six months. To ensure the Stakeholder Working Group is comprised of people who will represent Tukwi|a'S diverse range of age grDupS, neiQhbDch0Oda, and cultural backgrounds, City staff are guiding Metro in the identification of appropriate groups and representatives for the Stakeholder Working Group and facilitating the recruitment process. The first meeting iStentatively scheduled for mid -September Of2O18. SUMMARY Work has begun onthe King County Metro Community Connections Program: 1. This program is meant to help Tukwila residents use alternatives todriving in order to connect toregional transit and local destinations within Tukwila. 2. Community outreach via City-wide surveys and a Stakeholder Working Group will be used toidentify key needs and transportation solutions. 21 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 3. City staff will be working with community organizations and Metro to recruit Tukwila residents and community representatives for the Stakeholder Working Group in preparation for the first meeting in mid -September. FINANCIAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION Information Only. ATTACHMENTS 1. Community Connections Overview/Handout 2. Stakeholder Recruitment Flyer 3. Stakeholder Recruitment Application 22 ZAMetrolCommunity Connections\ InfoMemo_Aug13__TIC__v2_EK.doc kymng County METRO - __--------' ` ��N�N�K��K�� ^`�^��U�� ~~~°"°""°"~°"°"" " (-�~~~°"~"~"-~~""~~"�^~ Innovation /naction Community Connections is a four-year demonstration program (2015-2018), established through 2O15/2O16Biennial Budget Ordinance l7941. Program work bguided bvthe following priorities: • Service reduction mitigation (O projects) • Delivery against the Five -Year Plan (7 projects) ° Complementary services (8 projects in 2017, additional projects in 2018) Program Definition * Collaborate with local governments and community partners. w Develop cost-efficient transportation solutions in areas of King County not suited to fixed -route bus service. w Test new transportation services that take advantage of innovative ideas, unique partnerships, or emerging technology. Program Services New service solutions to -date include Community Ride, Community Shuttle, Community Van, Community Transportation Hub, Real -Time Rideshareand TripPooi Program Process Community outreach and partnerships are central to the planning of Community Connections Goal: Understand and identify transportation needs and gaps. Process: Solicit feedback from community key stakeholders via surveys, media, and Stakeholder Working Group. Goal: Develop and refine alternative service solution concepts. Process: Develop solution concepts with Stakeholder Working Group using survey analysis. Solicit community feedback via surveys etc. Goal: Communicate results tocommunity stakeholders and decision makers. Process: Convene final Stakeholder Working Group meeting, update project webpage,public, meetings, council presentations, etc. 23 CITY C)FTUKVV|LA& KING COUNTY METRO COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS PROJECT Stakeholder Recruitment King County Metro's Community Connections Program brings alternative transportation options to areas of King County that do not have adequate traditional bus service. Tukwila is well-connected to the regional transit network; however, various geographic and physical barriers, including 1-405 and 1'5, limit residents' direct access to this network Many residents live in locations that are not within walking distance to transit, and current transit options in several of the City's neighborhoods are indirect orinfrequent. Additionally, the Tukwila International Boulevard Station (T|BS) and Interurban Avenue South Park & Ride lots are nearly full each day, beginning early in the morning. Metro and the City of Tukwila have partnered on a Community Connections project to address the local transportation needs ofTukwila residents, and toimprove transportation options for residents traveling to, from and around Tukwila. During this project, Metro and City staff will collaborate with agroup of community representatives and stakeholders to identify residential mobility needs in Tukwila, and develop mobility solutions to address these needs. These group members will be asked to attend approximately four meetings, over the course of six months, beginning in mid-September2O18- All meetings will occur inTukwila, during days and times ofthe week that work best for the majority ofthe o members. group eno ers. If you are interested in representing your community's mobility needs in this group, and are able to make the time commitment, please contact a Tukwila Comm unity Connector by September 14, 2018. 24 City of Tukwila Community Connections Project Resident Stakeholder Working Group Member Application King County Metro is currently recruiting Tukwila residents for a stakeholder working group. This group will collaborate with City and Metro staff to identify residential mobility needs in Tukwila, and develop mobility solutions to address these needs. Those interested in participating in the working group are asked to attend approximately four meetings over the course of six months, beginning in mid -September 2018. If you are interested in participating in this stakeholder working group, please provide the following information, and answer the following questions to the best of your ability. FIRST & LAST NAME NEIGHBORHOOD OCCUPATION GENDER ETHNICITY AGE GROUP 18 — 24 25— 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75+ 1) What affiliations do you have with Tukwila organizations (neighborhood groups, church, etc.)? 2) What has/have been your experience(s) working in a group process? 3) Why are you interested in participating in the stakeholder working group for this project? 4) What mobility issues should Metro consider for this effort in Tukwila? 25 26 SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (S[ATBd)'June Meeting Summary Tuesday, June l9,ZO18 i Introductions ii Reports: Cynthia Foley: Regional Transportation Committee update on Metro CONNECTS implementation and that Metro has issued aRequest for Proposals for the paratransitprogram. iii Sustainable Airport Master Plan —SeaTacAirport: Port ofSeattle Commissioner Calkins provided anoverview of operations at SeaTac Airport, describing how demand for seats on planes has grown with population growth in the region. The Port acknowledged that it is a good suggestion to consider siting another regional airport and that the regional baseline study being conducted by the PSRC will look at overall description of growth and how toaccommodate it. Port of Seattle staff, Claire Gallagher provided an overview of the Sustainable Airport Master Plan process of work already completed including conducting an inventory, developing forecasts, conducting facility planning and developing alternatives. Near term major improvements atSeaTacAirport include: New aircraft parking, improved transit connections, above ground automated people mover connecting car rental with terminal, realignment of southbound lanes to airport to increase capacity, second terminal improvements (processor with ticketing, baggage processing), adding 19 gates (to the 90existin8). Relocation of maintenance shop and new firefighting station, taxiway improvement (more pavement for planes to que), relocation of fuel farm. Question: How are the annual number nfplanes calculated? 426kaircraft /nJ027to480kaircraft /nJO28, increased by64kper year m275 totalflights per day. Cargo isosmall portion ofthat figure. Arla Purcell, Director of Sustainability for SeaTac Airport provided an overview and described the purpose of the NEPAand SEPA,federal and state environmental processes being employed. She described the robust, l2'18 month engagement process to prepare a NEPA Environmental Assessment and a SEPA Environmental Impact Statement. Three open houses are planned. The agency and public scopinKprocess begins July Z3-6Odays thruSept. 21. Week ofSept loth, the agency and public meetings will beheld. ScopinQpackage will provide information on near term projects, engagements and preliminary methodology on the topics. There are a variety of ways to comment on the website or at public meetings with court reporters. Questions: Concern with impacts ofgrowth on surrounding communities. What kind of assurance will be given toprioritization nfmitigations and impacts and funding? The process requires the Port tnnnitigotsƒorimpacts, beyond what isrequired legally isopolicy question. The Port Commission has pledged toconduct otransparent process but must decide at what point will use of public dollars to mitigate impacts be enough? The Port is considering use of mitigation formulas and strategies usedfor maritime impactsfor this SeoTocexpons/on. The state is concluding a study in fall, 2019 on the impacts of fine particulates associated with air travel at SeaTac. Will this study beincorporated into your environmental process? /finformation isavailable wewill use /t. First part of state study is looking at levels offine particulates and how much are associated with aircraft. Second part o/the study looks ot the health ofpopulations surrounding the airport. P0S co -funded that study. This a long range plan, other jurisdictions have long range plans. Why not have all jurisdictions plan together, regionally. PSR[isproducing the long range, regional plan with olot ofelected officials and it isthe most appropriate place. The purpose ofthe PSR[study is topull together all ofthe data and studies toproduce o baseline. PSRC is working with the FAA to produce the scope and timing of the study that will line up with the completion ofVision 2O50/nid'2O30. PSR[study isodescriptive and not nprescriptive studvforthe PC8and the region osolook othow toaccommodate growth and dennond/o/air travel. iv, Sound Transit, Bus Rapid Transit on|-K05and SIR 5ZZ/NE145t-h: Barnard Van deCamp spoke toforecasted growth in ridership and to Sound Transit's development of Bus Rapid Transit lines beginning in 2024 on two corridors: |'4O5and SIR 5lJ/NE145* @RTwill improve transit speed, reliability and access. Extensions to park and ride lots, new buses, new bus operations and maintenance facility, branding and rider information system. 27 Project goals are tostay inbudget, maximize ridership, improve mobility and provide access for multiple modes and users. Trying to build a network so working very closely with KC Metro and communities in which we are operating tosuite local needs. 1-405 master plan looked at a variety of technologies and leaned toward BRT. Examples in the north end made are ramps in Bellevue, other investments over time. Includes SR518. From BurientoBellevue toLynwood —37mile corridor. llBRTstations over 7cities, 3parking facilities, 1,3O0new stalls, 1 new transit center, estimated 15'18k riders by 2040. Connections to light rail at Lynwood, Bellevue and Speed and reliability show improved 8RTtravel times. From South Renton toBuheninZU16shows 31minutes in travel time, after 8RTZl minutes (improving rte 560) intravel time. BRTattempts to replicate light rail with infrequent stops, dedicated lanes, raised platforms, adequate shelter, off -board fare collection and real-time information. Dedicated lanes and help from VVSDOT on|-4K)5,make this possible. Between Renton and 8urien we will have to weave in the highway from Rainier Avenue exit over to the HOV lane in the center and then out tothe Tukwila |nt'|Blvd. Bus only lanes planned for SR5l8but POSand VVSDOTtolook atSR518between Tukwila |nt'|Blvd and |'5. Sound Transit is re -working the ST3 project to make sure it is the right project to build and for efficiencies, environmental work will launch after the scopinK is complete. Questions: What kinds ofbuses will beused? Right now, diesel hybrids but weare looking otelectronic buses. Currently there are no60/botbuses onthe market that have gone thnufederal testing successfully howcverthc technology is changing rapidly. There is nothing for southeast King County. Has anyone conducted a return on investment study for cost to each rider for the entire system? We will be tracking costs and ridership closely. What about parking? Sound Transit (and Metro) are looking at managing parking, oerhopschorgingonom/no/ rote. King County isall about equity for everything. Who would SCAT8dwrite aletter toget someone's attention as to further expansion south? /fthe S{ATBdsupported expanding the RTAboundaries, they could write oletter indicating the support oftheir member cities to initiate that process. Can't connect the dots onall the changes coming. Can vvesee them all inone place? The PSR[has developed for thefirst time all transit operator planning into one map for the Regional Transportation Plan. For the Tukwila |nt'|Blvd station, what kind ofimprovements may beneeded? Park and Ride station isƒu8o8 thetinve. Currently olot ofbus service. STcurrentivdeciding /four B8Tshou6denter the station vs. pull upon Tukwila Int'l Blvd. V. Approval ofthe May Meeting Summary: May Meeting Summary Approved. vi. Public Comment: Debbie Wagner, 8urien: The Port'sSAMPisaharmful and destructive plan for our communities. Noise complaints are increasing rapidly, niQhtimecargo flights are flying atnight. Poorest and predominately minority communities are most injured and least able to benefit. Mitigation is not being discussed. Reject the SAMP. Windows installed tnmitigate noise have not worked and have been pulled. Noise complaints have tripled. JCA0e/,Des Moines: South end gets screwed when itcomes toplanning. | was anengineer when the 5AMP was built and then vvetalked about impacts. The Port should befactoring inpollution generated from its airplanes into public information and its environmental process. Meeting adjourned lO:53a.m. 28 SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd) MEETING AGENDA Tuesday July 17, 2018 9:00 — 11:00 a.m. SeaTac City Hall 4800 South 188th Street SeaTac 1. Open Meeting (Breakfast provided by the City of Normandy Park) • Introductions • Approve June SCATBd Meeting Summary Action 9:00 a.m. 2. Reports and Communications • Chair or Vice Chair • Participant Updates (from RTC and Other Regional Committees) Report and Discussion 9:05 a.m. 3. Regional Integrated Transit Network — South King County Focus Gil Cerise, Puget Sound Regional Council Report and Discussion 9:15 a.m. 4. I-5 System Partnership Thomas Noyes, WSDOT Report and Discussion 9:45 a.m. 5. • Public Comment • Next SCATBd Meeting: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 • Next meeting breakfast will be provided by the City of Pacific Discussion 10:05 a.m. 29