The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIC 2018-08-27 Item 2A - Powerpoint Presentation Shown at Meeting - Transportation Improvement Board Overview / Strander Boulevard and 27th Street';?0¢,AWatTAMAcf tsto 08' PHASE 2 V„IM Jack in 1944,N he Box r k wi PSE ,kr*if Transportation Improvement Board Overview and Strander Boulevard/27th Street Discussion City of Tukwila Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Ashley Probart, Executive Director Greg Armstrong RE., Regional Engineer August 27, 2018 A.7.04 f94,A.A2 ASE 1 migg wt.wpiwN TIB Mission and Core Values Improve and Innovate Continual) modern e business prat- es to ensure connection between �I � e motions C to l st for project completion Strong prospect u fl funding exists byre TB provides funds, T omission The TIB funds high priority transportation projects in communities throughout the state to enhance the movement of people, goods, an services. Manage projects to ribbon cutting Agency goal is project com pietion rather than grant aw and Dollars in the ground, not in the bnk F unding is to s. e m tined dent use State Budget Supplemental: • Capital Expenditures: • Operating Expenditures: $9.1 Billion $4.9 Billion $4.2 Billion • Other State Transportation Agencies: • County Road Administration Board • Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board • Transportation Improvement Board • WSDOT-Local Programs *2018 Supplemental $ 94M $ 51M $261M $276M $346M* How is the gas tax distributed? 49.4-CENT GAS TAX DISTRIBUTION Transportation Partnership Account, 8.5 2003 Transportation (Nickel) Account, 5 Connecting Washington, 11.9 Motor Vehicle Accou t, 10.21 Special Category C, 0.75 Counties, , 2 Cities, 2.96 Ferries, 1.08 CRAB, 1,03 oFm 5/17/2D18 Rule of thumb: 1 penny = $32 million annually 4 Codified: • State Gas Tax: $213M/biennium • Electric Vehicle Fee: $300,000/biennium Connecting Washington -Not Codified • Gas Tax: $9.7M/biennium • Complete Streets: $14.67M/biennium @$237M/Biennium Totci Ca?1,S,1ze TIB Funding: Recent Awards 44 P-t ec — T B Finding. Project Selections Select Funding Program FY 2019 November 17, 2017 Selection Dare FY 20 9 15.87 C! o Cali for Projects Summary Cali Geographic Distribution Historic Funril:g ProgIrarrl Sizes FY 2019 Geographic Distribution County Aso tin Funded TIB Funds County Funded TIB Funds 2 $9418349 L1280 0 1039,E ., 95 175 2 $01,600,575 $$50., 1GOf) 11182101880238 5 8029., 075 I,.64; }58 r',Nci'itc 3 V0,241,403 $358,78 S Ne ,_w. =r ' 7,952,.355 $1 32.,500 20 Iui r,.., 5 $2, 99,1813 $88,568 327 ,$91 ,,5c00v e. $45.247 $42.S45 "'#_E # 9 $0,,C5079 $ .0:. 8 n6,b86,5pe 2 $ I,. 36 639 2 �yn,a ` ,068, $6,529,1 20 $372487„815 $4, 2,3 3!00 4 .$2,620,200 $2,45 4 1„7.29,fl22 ., s #. ,.. 383 $11,040, adi % 4,t75,340 Transportation Improvement Board: Tukwila A PrOjeet> —a TE Project Mapping Projects in King County TIB ARfncj TUKWILA L.1J PviCt,r West Valley Highway (SR Strander Bed to I-405 " 2019 UA.F 53rd Avenue 5 'S 137th Street to, S 144th Strut FY 2.017 U.AP S 144th Street Tukvuita International Blvd Kam* 43rd FY 201.5 U5P Interurban Avenue S 5 143rd Sheet to Fort Dent Way F?.` 23:4 UFP Andover Park W. Tukvita Pkwy to S&antler Blvd FY 201; d?CP 14f{ktat Drive & Southcerlte Parkway 600' 5 of Strander Bred to 4C10" N of Ent FY 2338 LCP SOutl enter Pkwy Extensior S 180th St bo 5 200th St Fr" 2.a17 VLICfP' All TIB projects in Tukwila VA,,le Center Federal 'Way TIB Project Funding Sumrary City of Tukwila Total Projects: 21 (3 Activ 18 Complete) Total Project Length 15A mi. Total TIB Funding $38,874,841 Total Project Costs $134,291,311 Remaining Commit rr ent $4,195,668 r4Map, City narneirdserainmed EasI Hff ',Mardian Lake r r' Ara! Mop data?2Tttd, ±o Toros, of Use R.P.M. apaso 7 Performance Management Dashboard 1,h1V Perks s+nce—[TIE P.; effarmen e Customer Performance Summary City of Tukwila Population 19,800 Valuation $5,7a Performance Ratings Project Delays Activxt Project Alum faer Deaye, Lifespan over Ti8 standard Project Cb eouts Are' Projects Last 5 Prap"eces Niaarulse.r lieya. tad rSTl Days Pro oct cErsseocrts } 90 days Project Bridget Active Projects 4,7777777,777),, Perce•na Change, in THE Era Increases vs. surpluses Project Billings Actixic Propene Percent Uelayeed Ailliegv Active Projects {3p Engineering, Costs Active Projects tas 5 Prefects ow- Percent'ds Eng„ine,erhIs Costs Totag Engirteerlogi Total Contract Cyr;,jecta,,,eF COMPLETED p roj, -'c, L000 County King Mayor/Chair Allan Ekberg Engelneering Official Henry Hash TI6 Engineer Greg Armstrong Customer Information Agency Statistics Project Information Billing Information Project Delays Funding Applications Funded Project Summary Active Projects All Projects Number of ProlEds 3 28 Project Length 1,0 miles 27,5 n TataTES Fun ding $5,925,780 $36,874,841 Re MO ft Commtl re..nt $4,195,668 Net Increases vs Surpluses- S350,000 To Project Casts $10„357,189 $134 291,331 Average Project Lifespan # of .Projects Average Lifespan Till Standard LIAP d 798months 69 UCF 10 83,4 months 84 SCAP 0 0,0 months 36 SP 2 54,0 months 30 RIP 1 68,0 months — 3CPP 0 0,0 months 30 ,PPP 0 0,0 months, 30 Total Payments by Calendar Year 5Ad 4 1990 193s 2002 Funding Appficatiran Summary Last FY ,gen. Last F YAgency.Awarded .Pro1ETt Total App. Iic boat Trt matte d;a Totai Projects Funded 2aa8 20.14 2020 2019 23 8 8 Performance Management Dashboard TIH Perform..aYkce ieSanaBemerrt Dashboard TIB At A Glance Financiai Status PA and Balance. SCPC.a. Fund Balance Project PaymentsIh"TD) R�i�eaoinC c(i:^YtTirment Change TIB h:.icxcs(':^.STD) Project Status AcHve Pr€je£ts Corn piete0 Projects tFyI Under C i nstruct';an KPI Status TYB Carl milmert Le've3 Net Revenue Coast ration Payments verasePayment Cy e De$,lyed «r Oject'a Transactor: Processing Fund Balances Gas Tax Revenue ,Accounts Payable Commitment lnventary Current Inventory Status TIB Financial Statement c3un ',Alf AccnOnRevenue Ex le Deposits les a{ 0pk^,i3'tlon6 bran[ p:aynr�nt $8, 587.572.74 $ D.00 $0.00, S26,218,75 Biennium to Date $71„510,915.39 35.970.559, 54 3 0,00 $297.889.45 68,613,791.4.9 577,809,377.38 S123,375,00 $13,119,0635.00 5563,371.00 60,032,39'.03 $106,627,847.00 54,506,44B.03 T. E:xpertses 013.605,831.(0 S112,166,686.00 NET Total Net (Revenue - Expenses) February 5016 to February 2518 -1011 ($5,192,03931) (S34,357„308,62) Current Total Account Balance Total Revenue Total Expense's $28,913,636.74 aa,aas r.-y.., 20,3 Feb 16 Aug 16 Fab:] sea 17 Funding Cycle May June July Augusil Septo Octob No e Program Urban Programs • Urban Arterial Program (UAP) • Arterial Preservation Program (APP) • Urban Sidewalk Program (SP) $72 M $8 M $5 M Small City Programs • Small City Arterial Program (SCAP) • Small City Preservation Program (SCPP) • Small City Sidewalk Program (SP) $13 M $6 M $3 M TOTAL $107 Million Fund Source: 3.04 Cents of the State Gas Tax Arterial Programs 1.1.. Arterial Imogram ��I��I ■I�tri6uti�� 111 iiii.. �tat��l�■ Puget Sound $39.1M 54.3% Northwest $7.6M 10.5% Northeast $8.0M 11.2% Southeast $7.3M 10.1% Southwest $10.0M 13.9% This program typically funds $1 for every $3.20 requested 1a Arterial Programs Projects that improve at least one of the following: • Safety • Growth & Development • Physical Condition • Mobility ,•* Strander Boulevard Discussion Interurban Trail) Connector ,,Alt.PRIVRMSRatatrnwro #09k4A*A1A 4 40444144,. A "4.404 4, 414 0.40** AvAdtillk. :86140.*, %St' 4444') 4k. c 4-444, 4. 444 .4"4.'44.04, 2014 FMSIB - Corridor Relief • Daily Freight Volumes and Percentage of ADT with SW 27t" St./Strander Blvd Connection. • This project relieves regional freight congestion Source: City of Tukwila presentation: 3-21-14to FMSIB Daily Freight City of Renton Strander Boulevard Extension ur>~Pes & Percent of ACTT: pening Year 2C15• with Strander Extension Figure 5.14'. Phase III: 2014 Presentation • Construct UPRR bridge and complete the 5-lane roadway connectionfrom West Valley Hwy to Naches Ave SW: Cost: $37,000,000 • Anticipated Partners: TIGER FY 2014, FMSIB, FAST, City of Renton, City of Tukwila, Federa funds, TIB. • Readiness: NEPA complete, ROW reserved Source: City of Tukwila presentation: 3-21-14to FMSIB Phase III: 2018 PSRC Presentation Phase III • Construct UPRR bridge and complete the 5-lane roadway connection from West Valley Hwy to Naches Ave SW: Cost: $39,000,000 Anticipated Partners: TIGER, FMSIB, FAST, City of Renton, Tukwila, Federal funds, s: Approved NEPA with April 2018, ROW Cross-section at Pedestrian Bridge Phase III: 2018 PSRC Presentation Funding • City has secured $10.5 million in construction funding (25%) (FMSIB, FASTLANE, and FHWA Discretionary) • City Transp/infrastructure Committee and Council have expressed support for this project. Project is currently in the City TIP. Much of the remaining construction consists of grants Key funding partners have indicated a willingness to fund a on of the project as the option to pursue a Local Improvement District ant funding is available, City would fund through its x base. rant funding is available, City would fund through its x base. a r% 479 Ie become ft r.r Phase III: 2018 TIB Application (i) 0_ 0 0 (-3 Phase Design Engineering Right of liAray Construction Engineering Construction Other Construction Contract 4„000„0:00 4,500,000 72,561„480 B Funds 14,.}.11AL 82,O6146O NONELIGIBLE ENGINEERING Engineering exceeding 30% of eligible construction costs is not eligible for TIB reimbursement OTHER NONELIGIBLE COSTS (for example, landscaping greater than 5% of eligible construction contract costs, new utilities) FUNDI NG PARTN ERS TOTAL ELIGIBLE COST TIB MATCHING RATIO Total TIB Funds/Total Eligible Costs ocal Funds Source Public or Private Commitment Letter or Status TUKWILA FMSIB FASTLANE WSDOT Discreticnary BUILD America Grant Other State Discretionary TA' Public Public Public Public Public Amount In CIP Letter Included Letter Included Letter Included No Commitment 6,581,480 5:„G00,000 ,000,000 00,000 25„000,000 No Commitment. 2.5,000,000 Emil IN I —m of a- irri S rander Boulevard funding needs suggest: Phase Totai Cast I MI Funds Locai Funds NONELIGIBLE ENGINEERING Engineering exceeding 30% of ekgibk, construction costs is not *ble, for TIB reimbursement OTHER NONELIGIBLE COSTS (ftw ex: pie, landscaping greater than 5% of elkible construction contract costs, new willtes TOTAL ELIGIBLE COST TIB MATCHING RATIO Total TIB Funds/Total agible Costs I spend most ofmy timefund-raising." 4,7 1 Community Support $50,000 To $5M $5M to $15M Over $15M Identify your chance of project success Identify the program(s) that meets your objective -Example Local $ - 1 or 2 Sources p�rtn Tig DOT rate 1-3 years Local $ TIB PSRC State Agencies'Budget':. Private $ :s 't ' Multiple Sources . „ µ 3-6 years Local $ - Multiple Sources TIB-Urban Arterial Program PSRC State Agencies g Private $ State Budget (line item) National Grants (i.e. TIGER) and/or 6 years + 22 SSODDnS MOB Identify your chance of project success Identify the program(s) or revenues that meet your objective Low $ High $ EXAMPLE (D SSODDnS MOB Identify your chance of project success Identify the program(s) or revenues that meet your objective Low $ High $ Impact fees Partner Contributions Transportation Benefit Districts REET Special Pu • Metrooc • Fire, etc Private Sector $ State Budget Proviso- Local B Depends on delegation PWAA rpose Districts: litan Parks. State Transp B Grants and TI B-@$105M/yr -grant programs only Local Bond State Budget Proviso every 10 years State Capital Budget- 30? biennium MPO/Fed TIGER-1/ INFRA 11% 6/ success EXAMPLE 24 A typical funding strategy for high cost projects: (Projects over $25M): "Boots on the ground" Examples of Potential Funding Partners: Available Funds Average Award Award Frequency Anticipated Rating (Very low, low, medium, high...) Federal: -PSRC -INFRA Port Railroad Sound Transit King County Metro Cilty of Renton Department of Commerce Public Works Trust Fund Loan Transportation Improvement : oard Developer/Private Sector LID Total: Project match funding required: Net: 25 inancBd Identify your chance of project success TIB Ftnanchsi inf,Drmation Funding Partners Partner Funding by Funding Source Funding Sources - Historical View Partner Funding by Funding Source FY 20191113 Funded Projects T1l3 Funds Local Funds, • WSDOT Federal Funds in Private Funds III Transit Port Railroad 11 Utility CERB • Public Works Board • FrvIsIB Nk% Other Public Funds • Other State Funds • LID • Other Select Fund Series 2019 Funding Source Projects Amount 11B, 150 $114,165,544 LOC31 Agency .107 $40,65434:9 W S DOT 3 331429920 Federal Funds 14 5731290,545 Private Funds 6 $2.0,207,007 Transit 1 $95,000 Port it $1517451104 Raihroad 1 $23100,000 Utikity 1 71343100 CERB 1 53,300,000 Pu bk. Works Board 0 30 FMS10 0 SO Other public Funds 531011,C63 Other State Funds 5 $22,923,090 LID 0 $0 Other 1 3250000 COBiCi D $0 Total Partner Funding S296,706,212 A typical funding strategy for high cost projects: (Projects over $25M): Big Picture: Be prepared to invest community and personal political capital --- addressing major capital investments and addressing community social needs should not be binary Must be part of a clear public vision that may span multiple election cycles- projects of this scale take years to plan and often two or more years to construct. Accept that "many hands" will be required and staff accordingly —budgeting a few hundred thousand for staff and an "A team" of consultants = multi -million dollar payoff. (This council decision is the biggest factor in putting together project funding). 27 A typical funding strategy for high cost projects: (Projects over $25M): "Boots on the ground" • One Project Lead -must be credible • Direct line to the Mayor/City Manager • Part of developing and communicating a project marketing strategy • Understanding of funding landscape • Be able to provide right person for all things technical on short notice 28 A typical funding strategy for high cost projects: (Projects over $25M): "Funding Strategy" • Funding Strategy -never take a year off -you lose 2 or 3 if you do. • Sustained city financial commitment • Continuous staff investment • Incremental project delivery/progress (i.e. design work, community outreach, etc.) • Proof of financial concept: • Demonstrating city financial commitment and city financial limits/ability • How funding partners strategically fit project funding need • Regional lead (i.e. PSRC-region wide/county) • May need to persuade others in region to put your project at the head of the line (and put their project on hold) • State grant lead • State legislative lead -Transportation and Capital Budget strategy • Federal lead -lobbyist on retainer and/or be committed to multiple city leadership visits to Washington D.C. and meeting with our delegation 29 A typical funding strategy for high cost projects: (Projects over $25M): From a state grant agency perspective: • Be prepared and committed to educate and update staff and/or Board(s) on project status. • Be knowledgeable and anticipate state agency criteria-i.e. TIB will require a value engineering study due to Strander Boulevard complexity. • Demonstrate other partner commitments. • The Applicant may need to make this the #1 project for multiple years • The Applicant should understand that if selected, they may be frozen from future grants for a few years (plan ahead for other city projects or be prepared to explain to constituents why their favorite project is on hold). 30 Complete Streets • Created in 2011 • Funded in Connecting Washington • "to encourage local governments to adopt [Complete Streets] ordinances otal Complete Streets Adopted 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Complete Streets Adoption for Washington Cities and Counties 2006-2016 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4i01 Q2 Q3 Q4,Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4iQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4IQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4;Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4,Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4,Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014.2015 2016 Date Adopted Schedule and Available Funding July 2018 ECM Ebmination❑ * Dec 2018 Ebmination❑ Ea Jan 2019 Mar 2019 Feb 2019 1uiiimnm workEivith Io[I agent❑ [liming with work rmn❑ Number of Nominations= 88 Tier 1 Washington State Department of *Feaith Washington State Department of Transportation 13 nominations Tier 2 Department of Commerce r future scade wise .� DEPTTIISTORiC 11 nominations Tier 3 feet f prornotng walkable con,rnvniti 9 nominations • Actual award value based on adopted work plan • Maximum award level up to $1 M • Program level up to $21 M $100K ■ Not eligible a Active Award ki Eligible $1M Transportation Improvement Board Ashley Probart Executive Director (360) 586-1139 ashleyp@tib.wa.gov www.tib.wa.gov www.tib.wa.gov/tibdashboard