Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PS 2018-10-15 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
City of Tukwila Public Safety Committee • Kathy Hougardy, Chair <> Dennis Robertson • Thomas McLeod AGENDA MONDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2018 — 5:30 PM HAZELNUT CONFERENCE ROOM (At east entrance of City Hall) Distribution: Mayor Ekberg K. Hougardy D. Cline D. Robertson R. Bianchi T. McLeod C. O'Flaherty V. Seal L. Humphrey Item Recommended Action Page I. PRESENTATION(S) 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a. Red light cameras proposal. a. Forward to 10/22 C.O.W. Pg.1 Bruce Linton, Police Chief; and 11/5 Regular Mtg. Kraig Boyd, Police Commander; and Bill Devlin, Traffic Sergeant b. Revised King County inquest process. b. Discussion only. Pg.35 Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst c. 2019-2020 Biennial Budget: c. Forward to 10/22 C.O.W. Pg.59 • Police Department. Bruce Linton, Police Chief; and Eric Dreyer Deputy Police Chief for consensus. • Court. Trish Kinlow, Court Administrator 3. MISCELLANEOUS 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, November 5, 2018 The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 206-433-1800 (TukwilaCityClerk(aTukwilaWA.gov) for assistance. City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor TO: FROM: BY: INFOR ATIONAL E ORANDU Public Safety Committee Bruce Linton, Chief of Police Bill Devlin, Sergeant Traffic Division CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: 10/10/2018 SUBJECT: Automated Safety Camera Pilot Project Presentation ISSUE Increase public safety on the city roadways through enforcement and education using automated red-light cameras. BACKGROUND The most prevalent complaint from our residents is speeding on our arterials and neighborhoods. Our traffic Division has a difficult time keeping up with the increased call for enforcement. In addition to leveraging this technology for increased efficiency, studies have shown that red light cameras will make the city streets safer by reducing red light running violations. They are currently used in King, Pierce, Snohomish, Spokane, and Chelan counties. Here in King County there are programs in Bellevue, Des Moines, Federal Way, Issaquah, Kent, Lake Forrest Park, Mercer Island, Renton, and Seattle. ANALYSIS Red light running nationally causes hundreds of deaths, tens of thousands of injuries and billions of dollars in property damage. A driver runs a red light about every 20 minutes and more frequently during peak times. Studies show that automated safety cameras have reduce red light running, which in turn reduces the potential serious injury right angle collisions. They educate the public and that education has a spillover effect to the non -camera intersections. They will assist with increased traffic flow and increase the safety of police officers. The camera systems will assist with better tracking of intersection statistics such as traffic flows, number of vehicles, peak hours of the days, number of collisions, and tickets issued in these intersections. They will provide more efficient service with no additional FTE's. The Police, Prosecutor, City Attorney, Public Works, and the Tukwila Municipal Court supports the program. Studies show that nationally a high percentage of the public is in favor of automated red-light cameras and the Tukwila Police Department has reached out at community meetings and through social media to verify support in our area. PROPOSED INTERSECTIONS The proposed intersections for the pilot project were analyzed using collision data, projected violations, layout and potential design difficulty for the cameras system placement. The following proposed intersections are as follows: Boeing Access at Martin Luther King Jr (Southbound and Eastbound - WSDOT), Southcenter Parkway at Strander Blvd (Northbound and Westbound), and Grady at Interurban Ave South (Eastbound and Westbound -WSDOT). Companies such as ATS has worked with WSDOT intersections. The Red -Light vendors will do the installations, that is the normal business model. Signage is required by the RCW and the City will install and maintain them at their expense (vendors will provide the technical assistance with the recommending placement). The cameras have a minimal power draw and will utilize 1 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 existing power. If power is not available, the vendor will bring power in and that power will then be available for other city users. These requirements are all part of the contractual agreement. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS AND RETENTION Public records requests are forwarded to the city and the city can request needed information from the selected vendor. Images must be retained and accessible up through the exhaustion of the appeals process and then destroyed. VENDOR SELECTION The Police Department has drafted an RFP to select a suitable vender. The review and selection process will incorporate criteria based on experience and a broad level of Service focused on past successes in other jurisdictions. FINANCIAL IMPACT Considering normal Red-light Camera Vendor business models, there is no upfront cost, and the per camera, per month charge quoted is estimated at $4,500.00 to $5,000.00. These programs are self -funding and vendors normally require a 3-5-year contract to actualize their return on investment. RECOMMENDATION Forward to the Council for consideration and approval of the proposal of the 3-year Pilot Program proposal along with the required ordinance at the and ordinance at the October 22, 2018 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting. Further, recommend a phased process for the implementation which affords the Council an opportunity to off ramp at various junctures prior to an actual contract being signed. This affords the department to work through the multiple steps required to ensure a successful program. ATTACHMENTS - Automated safety cameras pilot project power point -Draft automated safety camera city ordinance - RCW for automated safety camera systems - Red-light Camera Timeline 2 W:12018 Info MemoslredlightCameras10-15.doc UKWIIEJ, Washington Automated Traffic Safety Camera Program Cameras will make :the city streetssafer, by reducing red light running; which, will reduce potentially serious injury right angle collisions. Cameras will educate the public with potential spillover to surrounding non - camera intersections, which, will help with traffic flow. Cameras will assist with internal investigations, law suits, and traffic collisions in the intersections. Cameras will increase safety of police officers and provide more efficient service, with no additional FTE's.* Camera will allow for better tracking of vehicles, collisions, and tickets issued in these intersections. ork Police, Prosecutor, City Attorney, Public Works, and Court supports this program, and studies show that nationally a high percentage of the public are in favor of RLC. •►Automated enforcemen ` refers © the Ube { f ;ameras © enforce traffic safety laws in, this case we are talking about red Light running 24/7. Their primary purpose is to improve traffic safety by modifying driver behavior. �► Many states have laws that explicitly authorize automated enforcement. Here in Washington it is RCW 46.63.170. ■► The most common type of automated program is for red light violations. The use of cameras to enforce speed limits is less common, but increasing, especially in school zones. Many jurisdictions treat automated enforcement citations just like parking tickets in that the registered owner is liable. Parking tickets do not result in points and/or not recorded on a driver's record. 01 In our State/area there are currently 17 programs, with 343 Safety Cameras They are used in King, Pierce, Snohomish, Spokane and Chelan Counties King County ATS camera programs include Bellevue (9), Des Moines (11), Federal Way (16), Issaquah (2), Kent (8), Lake Forrest Park (11), Mercer Island School District (5) Renton (18) Seattle (59), Seattle Public Schools (120) Their primary purpose is to irprove traffic safet}: From our mission statement -We provide superior services that support a safe, inviting and healthy environment for our residents, businesses and guests, this includes our roadways. And from our core values we are Responsive - We are timely and effective in the delivery of great customer service. We continually strive to find innovative ways to improve. These cameras are an innovative way to make a streets safer. Why is red light running a problem? Red light Runners cause hundreds of deaths, tens of thousands of injuries, and billions of dollars in property damage each year. In 2016, 800 people were killed, and an estimated 137,000 were injured in crashes that involved red light running. co National studies show the t in busy intersections; prior to the use a1= red light cameras, a motorist ran a red light about every 20 minutes and during peak times it was more frequent. One analysis of red-light violation data from 19 intersections without red light cameras, in four different states, found a violation rate of 3.2 per hour per intersection. Yes, in addition fio the decrease° in`red. light running aft camera -equipped' sites, studies show this effect is carried over to nearby signalized intersections that are not equipped with red light cameras. An Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) international red-light camera study concluded that cameras lower red light violations by 40-50 percent. w A 2016 Institute study comparing large cities with red light cameras to those without found the devices reduced the red-light running crash rate by 21 percent and the rate of all types of fatal crashes at signalized intersections by 14 percent. Previous IIHS research in California found significant citywide crash reductions followed the introduction of red-light cameras and injury crashes at intersections with traffic signals were reduced by 29 percent. O Front into side c©ilisions (right an)x file crash type most coseiy associate with red light running, at these intersections declined by 32 percent overall, and front side crashes involving injury fell 68 percent. An institute review of international red-light camera studies concluded that cameras reduce injury crashes by 25-30 percent. The Cochrane Collaboration, an international public health organization, reviewed 10 controlled before -after studies of red-light cameras effectiveness. Based on the most rigorous studies, there was an estimated 13-29 percent reduction in all types of injury crashes and a 24 percent reduction in right angle injury crashes. ome studies 1 ave`reorte to whie redcgh camera front -into -side collisions and overall injury crashes, they can increase rear -end crashes, however such crashes tend to be much less severe that front -into -side crashes, so the net affect is positive. The study sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration evaluated red light camera programs in seven cities and they found that overall, right-angle crashes decreased by 25 percent while rear -end collisions increased by 15 percent. N Boeing Access Road at MLK JrW y S (21/2-0/5/13/1) S 133 rd Ave S and Interurban Ave S (22/9-9/6/6/1) Southcenter Parkway at Strander Blvd (34/5-2/15/9/5) W. Valley at 180'h Ave S (26/5-3/3/13/4/4) Grady and Interurban Ave S (24/5-5/9/10 Southcenter Blvd at 615' Ave S (Stets Froml/1/14-12/31/16, 39 with 16 being right angle crashes, with 8 persons injured; 16 sideswipe; 6 rear end crashes; 1 fixed object). • After analysis ©f pro osed intersections usincg'collision stats° t d tape grap narrowed it down to three intersections, two directions each for the Pilot Project: Boeing Access Rd @ Martin Luther King Jr Wy - SB and EB directions Southcenter Parkway @ Strander Blvd - NB and WB directions Grady Wy @ Interurban Ave S - EB and WB directions w Strobe Controller Violation Capture (Video & Data) -= Citation Issued 01 Back Office -Review j44,0444,`, apnea Support Court Support '4* Webalto 2417 availability Viewviolation Images & video FAO • Online payments Violation ; WACO011t ViVationinfatom Customer service reps 8:00 AM-8:00 PM EDT Inquiries regarding violations Payments by phone 4 Citation Recipient Payment Support 0) o upfront cost -The euiprrert a!ried aid riaintained by the contracted company 3 Year contract required). $500.00 per sign includes installation cost by the city, 6 signs 2 per intersection- Signage is required by the RCW - $3,000.00 4,500.00 - $5,000.00 per camera, per month - $360,000.00 1 FTE for the court for the pilot project - S 108,845.00 Judge pro tem for additional mitigation hearings for citations and interpreters - $16,000.00 w Total budget - 5487,845.00 Public Safety Committee Community Orientated Police Citizens Advisory Board Tukwila International Boulevard Action Committee Tukwila Reporter Newspaper Hazelnut Publication City of Tukwila Website linked to Police Department Website 03 ctober 18,2018 Graff pro o Ri P • November 18, 2018 Vender selection and site surveys ■► December 18, 2018 Contract review and Council approval January 2019 Red Light Camera Pilot program begins March 2019 Quarterly analysis of the program begins I. June, September, December of 2019 Quarterly analysis January 2020 Annual Analysis January 2021 Annual Analysis with updates as requested October 2021 Final Public Safety Committee update, full implementation determination Cameras will make the city streets.' safer, by reducing red night running, which, will reduce potentially serious injury right angle collisions. Cameras will educate the public with potential spillover to surrounding non - camera intersections, which, will help with traffic flow. Cameras will assist with internal investigations, law suits, and traffic collisions in the intersections. Cameras will increase safety of police officers and provide more efficient service, with no additional FTE's.* Camera will allow for better tracking of vehicles, collisions, and tickets issued in these intersections. Police, Prosecutor, City Attorney, Public Works, and Court supports this program, and studies show that nationally a high percentage of the public are in favor of RLC. CS) 20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING THE USE OF AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS AND ADOPTING STANDARDS RELATED THERETO, TO BE CODIFIED AS TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.22 PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, very serious traffic accidents involving right-angle collisions at high rates of speed are often the result of drivers running red lights; and WHEREAS, studies show that these accidents result in more serious injury and deaths than other accidents at signalized intersections; and WHEREAS, locating automated traffic safety cameras at signalized intersections has been shown to reduce the frequency of traffic violations at these intersections and has resulted in a corresponding reduction in injuries and associated economic costs, and WHEREAS, the City has arterial intersections that would benefit from the strategic placement of automated traffic safety cameras; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila desires to improve traffic safety and pedestrian safety throughout the City with emphasis on critical intersections; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature has adopted Chapter 46.63 RCW, which authorizes local jurisdictions to use automated traffic safety cameras at arterial intersections, subject to some limitations; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 46.63.170(1)(a), the City has prepared an analysis of the locations where automated traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located; W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Automated traffic safety cameras 7-25-18.doc WD:bjs Page 1 of 5 21 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 9.22 of the Tukwila Municipal Code Established. A chapter of the Tukwila Municipal Code entitled "Automated Traffic Safety Cameras," to be codified as Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 9.22, is hereby established to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.22 AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS Sections: 9.22.010 Automated traffic safety cameras — Detection of violations — Restrictions 9.22.020 Notice of infraction 9.22.030 Prima facie presumption 9.22.040 Infractions processed 9.22.050 Fine 9.22.060 Nonexclusive enforcement Section 2. Regulations Established. TMC Section 9.22.010, "Automated traffic safety cameras — Detection of violations — Restrictions," is hereby established to read as follows: 9.22.010 Automated traffic safety cameras — Detection of violations — Restrictions A. City law enforcement officers and persons commissioned by the Tukwila Police Chief are authorized to use automated traffic safety cameras and related automated systems to detect and record the image of stoplight violations at the intersection of two arterials; provided, however, pictures of the vehicle and the vehicle license plate may be taken only while an infraction is occurring, and the picture shall not reveal the face of the driver or of any passengers in the vehicle. B. Each location where an automated traffic safety camera is used shall be clearly marked by signs placed in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that the driver is entering a zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera. C. "Automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control system or a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle whenever a vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal as detected by a speed measuring device. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Automated traffic safety cameras 7-25-18.doc 22 WD:bjs Page 2 of 5 Section 3. Regulations Established. TMC Section 9.22.020, "Notice of infraction," is hereby established to read as follows: 9.22.020 Notice of infraction A. Whenever any vehicle is photographed by an automated traffic safety camera, a notice of infraction shall be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within 14 days of the violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within 14 days of establishing the renter's name and address. A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic safety camera may respond to the notice by mail. B. If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of infraction is issued, provide a written notice to the rental car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car business if the rental car business does not, within 18 days of receiving the written notice, provide to the agency by return mail: (1) a statement under oath stating the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred; or (2) a statement under oath that the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred, or (3) in lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty. Timely mailing of this statement to the agency shall relieve the rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the infraction. C. The law enforcement officer issuing a notice of infraction shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon the inspection of photographs, microphotographs or electronic images produced by an automated traffic safety camera, citing the infraction and stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction. This certificate or facsimile shall be prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and shall be admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under this chapter. The photographs, microphotographs or electronic images evidencing the violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction. D. The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption set forth in TMC Section 9.22.030, or, in the case of a rental car business, satisfies the conditions under TMC Section 9.22.020.B. If appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under TMC Section 9.22.020.B is responsible for an infraction. E. All photographs, microphotographs or electronic images prepared under this chapter are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of duties under this chapter and, as provided in RCW 46.63.170(1)(g), they are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this chapter. No photograph, microphotograph or electronic image may be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations under this chapter nor retained longer than necessary to enforce this chapter. W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Automated traffic safety cameras 7-25-18.doc WD:bjs Page 3 of 5 23 Section 4. Regulations Established. TMC Section 9.22.030, "Prima facie presumption," is hereby established to read as follows: 9.22.030 Prima facie presumption A. In a traffic infraction case involving an infraction detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera under this chapter, proof that the particular vehicle described in the notice of traffic infraction was involved in a stoplight violation, together with proof that the person named in the notice of infraction was at the time of the violation the registered owner of the vehicle, shall constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that the registered owner of the vehicle was the person in control of the vehicle at the point where, and for the time during which, the violation occurred. B. This presumption may be overcome only if the registered owner, under oath, states in a written statement to the court or in testimony before the court that the vehicle involved was, at the time, stolen or in the care, custody or control of some person other than the registered owner. Section 5. Regulations Established. TMC Section 9.22.040, "Infractions processed," is hereby established to read as follows: 9.22.040 Infractions processed Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras shall be processed in the same manner as parking infractions. Section 6. Regulations Established. TMC Section 9.22.050, "Fine," is hereby established to read as follows: 9.22.050 Fine The fine for an infraction detected under authority of this chapter shall be a base monetary penalty of $136.00; and provided further, that whenever, in the future, the state of Washington increases the fine imposed under this chapter, by legislation or court rule, the City's fine shall be increased to a like amount upon the effective date of such legislation or court rule. Section 7. Regulations Established. TMC Section 9.22.060, "Nonexclusive enforcement," is hereby established to read as follows: 9.22.060 Nonexclusive enforcement Nothing in this chapter prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1)(a), (b) or (c). W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Automated traffic safety cameras 7-25-18.doc 24 WD:bjs Page 4 of 5 Section 8. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 10. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2018. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Allan Ekberg, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Automated traffic safety cameras 7-25-18.doc WD:bjs Page 5 of 5 25 26 RCW f.`" Automated traffic safety cameras —Definition. (1) The use of automated traffic safety cameras for issuance of notices of infraction is subject to the following requirements: (a) The appropriate local legislative authority must prepare an analysis of the locations within the jurisdiction where automated traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located: (i) Before enacting an ordinance allowing for the initial use of automated traffic safety cameras; and (ii) before adding additional cameras or relocating any existing camera to a new location within the jurisdiction. Automated traffic safety cameras may be used to detect one or more of the following: Stoplight, railroad crossing, or school speed zone violations; or speed violations subject to (c) of this subsection. At a minimum, the local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage. Cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras before July 24, 2005, are subject to the restrictions described in this section, but are not required to enact an authorizing ordinance. Beginning one year after June 7, 2012, cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera and any other relevant information about the automated traffic safety cameras that the city or county deems appropriate on the city's or county's web site. (b) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, use of automated traffic safety cameras is restricted to the following locations only: (i) Intersections of two arterials with traffic control signals that have yellow change interval durations in accordance with RCW 4 13 02, which interval durations may not be reduced after placement of the camera; (ii) railroad crossings; and (iii) school speed zones. (c) Any city west of the Cascade mountains with a population of more than one hundred ninety-five thousand located in a county with a population of fewer than one million five hundred thousand may operate an automated traffic safety camera to detect speed violations subject to the following limitations: (i) A city may only operate one such automated traffic safety camera within its respective jurisdiction; and (ii) The use and location of the automated traffic safety camera must have first been authorized by the Washington state legislature as a pilot project for at least one full year. (d) Automated traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an infraction is occurring. The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or of passengers in the vehicle. The primary purpose of camera placement is to take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate when an infraction is occurring. Cities and counties shall consider installing cameras in a manner that minimizes the impact of camera flash on drivers. 27 (e) A notice of infraction must be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen days of the violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within fourteen days of establishing the renter's name and address under subsection (3)(a) of this section. The law enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images produced by an automated traffic safety camera, stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction. This certificate or facsimile is prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and is admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under this chapter. The photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images evidencing the violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction. A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic safety camera may respond to the notice by mail. (f) The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction under RCW 46.63.030(1)(d) unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption in RCW 46 63.0'75, or, in the case of a rental car business, satisfies the conditions under subsection (3) of this section. If appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under subsection (3)(a) of this section is responsible for an infraction. (g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images prepared under this section are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of duties under this section and are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this section. No photograph, microphotograph, or electronic image may be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations under this section nor retained longer than necessary to enforce this section. (h) All locations where an automated traffic safety camera is used must be clearly marked at least thirty days prior to activation of the camera by placing signs in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera. Signs placed in automated traffic safety camera locations after June 7, 2012, must follow the specifications and guidelines under the manual of uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways as adopted by the department of transportation under chapter 47.36 RCW. (i) If a county or city has established an authorized automated traffic safety camera program under this section, the compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the equipment used must be based only upon the value of the equipment and services provided or rendered in support of the system, and may not be based upon a portion of the fine or civil penalty imposed or the revenue generated by the equipment. (2) Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 4o 01 and 46,52.120. Additionally, infractions generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras under this section shall be processed in the same manner as parking infractions, including for the purposes of RCW $.50.100, 35,20,220, 46.16A 120, and 46,20 270(2). The amount of the fine issued for an infraction generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the amount of a fine issued for other parking infractions within the jurisdiction. However, the amount of the fine issued for a traffic control signal 28 violation detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the monetary penalty for a violation of RCW U50 as provided under RCW 4 63.110, including all applicable statutory assessments. (3) If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of infraction being issued under this section, provide a written notice to the rental car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car business if the rental car business does not, within eighteen days of receiving the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by return mail: (a) A statement under oath stating the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred; or (b) A statement under oath that the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction occurred because the vehicle was stolen at the time of the infraction. A statement provided under this subsection must be accompanied by a copy of a filed police report regarding the vehicle theft; or (c) In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty. Timely mailing of this statement to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the notice of infraction. (4) Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.6.t..0:"•%0(1) (a), (b), or (c). (5) For the purposes of this section, "automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a speed limit as detected by a speed measuring device. (6) During the 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 fiscal biennia, this section does not apply to automated traffic safety cameras for the purposes of section 216(5), chapter 367, Laws of 2011 and section 216(6), chapter 306, Laws of 2013. [ 2013 3rd sp3,4, 44 § 406: 2015 1st sp,z°, c § 702; 2013 c 306 § 711, Prior: 2012 c § 3; 2012 c 8 § 7, 2011 e 367 § 704; 2010 c 161 § 1127: 2009 c 470 § 714; 2007 c 372 § 3, 2005 c 167 §1,] 29 30 Tukwila Police epartment Integratin 21st Century Technology Improving Community n Officer Safety („) Tuk S en on Ti Ian OCT 2021 JAN 2021 ANNUAL ANALYSIS WITH UPDATES AS REQUESTED JAN 2020 ANNUAL ANALYSIS DEC 2019 QUARTERLY ANALYSIS SEP 2019 JUN 2019 QUARTERLY ANALYSIS QUARERLY ANALYSIS MAR 2019.QUARTERLY ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM BEGINS JAN 2019RED LIGHT CAMERA PILOT PROGRAM BEGINS BEGINS DEC 18 CONTRACT REVIEW AND COUNCIL APPROVAL NOV 18 VENDOR SELECTION & SITE SURVEYS OCT 18 DRAFT PROPOSAL & RFP FINAL PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE UPDATE FULL IMPLEMENTATION DETERMINATION 2 • Public Safety Committee • Community Oriented Police Citizens Advisory Board • Tukwila International Boulevard Action Committee • Tukwila Reporter Newspaper • Hazelnut Publication • City of Tukwila Website linked to Police Department Website TUKWILA POLICE RED-LIGHT CAMERAS COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY co A City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL E ORANDU TO: Public Safety Committee BY Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst DATE: October 9, 2018 SUBJECT: Revised King County Inquest Process ISSUE The purpose of an inquest is to provide an open public forum, conducted by a neutral decision - maker, to shed light on the facts surrounding a death at the hands of law enforcement. Inquests are required by the King County Charter and established under state and county code. King County has just revised its inquest process and these changes will go into effect next year. DISCUSSION King County Executive Constantine formed an Inquest Process Review Committee in December 2017 to examine the inquest process and recommend changes. The Committee submitted its report on March 27, 2018. King County Police Chiefs met over the summer to discuss the recommendations and surface concerns. On September 5, Mayor Law of Renton and Mayor Walen of Kirkland emailed Sound Cities Association Mayors to sign onto a letter that would ask the Executive to pause implementation of the reforms and allow the citieselected officials to have a seat at the table in further discussions. The letter also referenced the implication of Initiative 940, the police accountability initiative, which will be on the November General Election ballot. Mayor Ekberg signed the September 12, 2018 letter. The City Council received a copy of the letter on September 18 and subsequently requested a Committee discussion on this topic. On October 3, 2018 Executive Constantine announced the new process for police inquests, expected to be up and running by the end of the first quarter 2019. Chief Linton will be in attendance at the Committee meeting to share his perspective and answer questions. ATTACHMENTS -9/12/18 Letter to Executive Constantine from Mayors - 10/3/18 Summary of Revised Inquest Process - Matrix of process changes - King County Executive Order 35 36 ° CITY OF NUMCLAW � °^.~.,,.. ~~ ~ ~ ` covingt n Federal Way KING COUNTY �0' , I Aj�' ~r ^ (,!,«`'neumn"u The Honorable Dow Constantine King County Executive 40151hAve. Suite 8OO Seattle, VVA981O4 I heCRY of MAPLE VALLEY RE: Proposal for revising process ofKing County inquests inuse-mfdemdly-6orcecircumstances Dear Executive Constantine: We are writing as mayors who share your belief in fostering the most open and transparent process possible for inquests that are conducted in the aftermath of deadly use of force. We also want to ensure that process is fair, balanced, and premised on the best science, data, and information available, which leads us to ask for further discussion at an elected official level. The inquest process, incases oflethal use offorce bvlaw enforcement, ismeant Loprovide an open public forum (conducted by a neutral decision maker) into the facts and circumstances surrounding adeath atthe hands oflaw enforcement. These are very serious matters, and vve are fortunate in King County, because while all counties in Washington State have the option to hold aninquest, only our county, bycharter, requires that one occur. VVeare also fortunate that law enforcement inWashington State recognizes that vve need now, more than ever before, to have police and the citizens they serve work together tnfind 37 Mayor, City of Auburn Executive Dow Constantine Page 2of3 September 1Z~IO1D compromises and solutions on how use of deadly force is evaluated and dealt with. During the 2018 Session of the Legislature in precede nt-setti ng fashion, representatives of law enforcement, De -Escalate VVashingtoD,andotherorg@nizations came together toenact both Initiative 34O(|-94U)and Substitute House Bill 3003(3HB3OOS)tOamend that initiative. 1-940/SHB 3003 changed the legal standard for when officers are considered justified in using lethal force, and it established landmark requirements for investigation and training of all sworn officers. Against that backdrop, vveare aware that King County has been reviewing and re-examining its inquest process, has issued a preliminary report (March 2018)and continues to consider updates tothe process. While xveunderstand the concept ofensuring that the inquest policy remain up-to'dateand relevant, vxewant toensure ittakes several factors into account: w We believe that whatever updates are made to the inquest process should first integrate thestatutoryunderpinningof|-948/5H83003andseeVvhat,ifanKsubst8ntk/echan8es should be made based upon the new state law going into effect. We believe the inquest process needs to continue to strike a balance in these emotional and difficult cases, sOthat both families and law enforcement feel their issues and concerns are being heard, represented, and evaluated appropriately. For example, vveare being told that the current inquest proposal guarantees families a voice, but does not provide any assurances that decision makers will hear from subject matter and forensics experts. We see these types of assurances as crucial to ensuring that the inquest process strikes a delicate balance and that it is conducted in the most fair, equitable, and information- and data -based manner possible. For these reasons and others, we ask that you and your office push the pause button on updates to the inquest process and allow more discussions with us as elected officials who are accountable both tothe citizens vve serve and the law enforcement officers m/eemploy. We believe xvehave the time toundertake further discussion and dothis right, particularly since 1-940 has now been placed on the ballot and SHB 3003 amendments are thus on hold. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our concerns and our desire to have forthright discussions with you and key players in your office who are working on updating 'the inquest process. Sincerely, ` Nancy BaWis CarolBenson Jeffrey Wagner Mayor, City of Black Diamond Mayor, City of Covington 38 Executive Dow Constantine Page 3 of 3 September 12, 2018 AmyOckerlander Mayor, City of Duvall Mary Lou Pauly Mayor, City of Issaquah Mitzi Johanknecht King County Sheriff Sean Kelly Mayor, City of Maple Valley Jan Molinaro Ji;r'Ferrell Mayor, City of Enumclaw David Mayor, City of Kenmore Amy Walen Mayor, City of Kirkland John M rchione Mayor, City of Redmond Christie Malchow M tt Larson Mayor, City of Sammamish ayor, City of Snoqualmie Mayor, City of Federal Way Dana Ralph Mayor, City of Kent Jeff Johnson Mayor, City of Lake Forest Park Denis Law Mayor, City of Renton Allan Ekberg Mayor, City of Tukwila 39 40 King CnUDfw Inquest Process October 3'2018 �UU�������� __'----'' Background The inquest process is unique to King County, required by King County Charter in all law enforcement related deaths, and established under state law and county code. The purpose of an inquest is to provide an open public forum, conducted by a neutral decision'maker,tn shed light onthe facts surrounding adeath atthe hands oflaw enforcement. Afurther purpose isto promote public understanding of those crucial events in our community in which law enforcement takes human life asapart uftheir official duties. Current process: * King County Prosecuting Attorney receives investigative materials from the investigating agency and notifies the King County Executive. • Executive requests King County District Court conduct eninquest. * District Court presides over the inquest, determines the scope of the issues, and decides who will becalled sowitnesses. m Participating parties o Family of the deceased, who must be represented by private counsel in order to participate o Officer involved inthe death u The law enforcement agency o The Prosecuting Attorney's Office, whose role is to assist the judge in conducting the inquest • Inquests are heard by a jury of six. They answer questions from the judge, called interrogatories. * Inquest interrogatories deal with questions nffact. o Their purpose is to give the jury an opportunity to judge credibility and determine the significant factual issues involved in the inquest, such as what actions occurred and what the actors thought nrknew. • Inquest interrogatories donot deal with questions oflaw, policy, recommendations, orwhether anyone is civilly nrcriminally liable. w The jury indicates the number of yes/no answers to the questions, and the Court sends that information tothe Executive. Revised Process: * Inquests will be administered by the Executive's Department of Executive Services (DES). Inquests will be conducted by an Inquest Administrator. DES will hire experienced formerjudges 41 on a pro tem basis to serve as the Inquest Administrator, who oversees the inquest process and is the neutral decision -maker. The InquestAdministrator, following the scope guidelines provided in the executive order will determine the scope of the issues, and decide who will be called aswitnesses. This role was role previously served byDistrict Court judges. * King County Prosecuting Attorney receives investigative materials from the investigating agency and notifies the King County Executive. m The King County Prosecuting Attorney will no longer serve to assist the judge during the inquest. Instead an Inquest 'Staff attorney, also hired on a pro-tem basis, will assist the Inquest Administrator during the inquest, DES will also hire a manager to support the operational and procedural requirements ofthe inquest process. • Participating parties o Family of the deceased, who will be provided a King County Public Defender or, may be represented byprivate counsel. u Officer involved in the death may participate at their request but will not be subpoenaed. There is a presumption that the involved officer will not participate. o The law enforcement agency. It is anticipated the agency chief or their designee would testify about current policy, while the scene investigator would testify about the event. • Inquests are heard by a jury of between four and six persons as required by state law. They answer questions from the judge, called interrogatories. m Inquest interrogatories deal only with questions offact. o Their purpose is to give the jury an opportunity to judge credibility and determine the significant factual issues involved inthe inquest, such aswhat actions occurred and what the actors thought orknew. • Scope ufthe Inquest o AS|scurrently the case, an inquest will result inthe issuance offindings regarding the cause and manner ofdeath. o Inquest interrogatories do not deal with questions of law, recommendations for future policy orprocedures, orwhether anyone iscivilly orcriminally liable. o However, the scope of the inquest will be expanded to include what the current involved |aVV enforcement agency policy is and whether the law enforcement officer complied with applicable law enforcement agency training and policy as they relate to the death. Testimony regarding what changes should be made to existing policy, procedure, and training isnot permitted. • The jury indicates the number of yes/no/unknown answers to the questions, and the manager sends that information tuthe Executive. Timeline: ° It is anticipated that inquests under the revised Executive Order would begin by the end of the 42 Issue Current Process Executive Order Access to Hearings • No recording, livestreaming, or info database is required or in existence, at this time. Interrogatories and jury responses are available upon request after the hearing concludes. • Staff in DES will keep an up-to-date webpage listing dates, times, and locations of upcoming inquests. Audio recordings of each inquest will be uploaded to the webpage when available. District Court District Court judge presides over inquest hearing. • District Court judges will no longer preside over inquest hearings in King County. Instead, a pool of pro tem judges will act as presiders. Superior Court • Jurors called from joining KCDC/KCSC jury pool. District Court provides facility space bailiffs, and court reporters. Superior Court provides security as mandated by RCW. • King County Superior Court will administer the jury process and maintain facilities appropriate to comfortably support jurors. Therefore, where requested by the County Executive, the Superior Court will coordinate with the Inquest Administrator to secure appropriate facilities, e.g., the presiding courtroom. Department of Public Defense • Families of the deceased are not provided legal representation for the inquest hearing at county expense. However, the County Council passed an ordinance to allow families representation through DPD. • Upon notification of the inquest, DPD will assign counsel for the family of the decedent unless the family indicates they have retained other counsel or do not wish to be represented by the King County Department of Public Defense. The Department of Public Defense will not be assigned in cases, where family is represented by private counsel. PAO Involvement • PAO acts as a neutral facilitator, presents evidence, makes recommendation to hold an inquest, assembles and transmits investigative file. • The Prosecuting Attorney will no longer participate in the hearing itself as a neutral facilitator. The PAO will continue to participate at an administrative/ministerial level, e.g. assembly and transmittal of the investigative file and issuing subpoenas. The PAO will also continue to make the recommendation to hold an inquest to the County Executive. Scope of Inquest • Scope is limited to facts and circumstances surrounding the death. No questions of policy and training are allowed. Statements about department policy and training are only allowed through the involved officer's testimony. • In addition to the facts and circumstances surrounding the death, the scope of the inquest will be narrowly expanded to include questions about current department policy and training in a given jurisdiction, No speculative or prospective questions regarding a law enforcement entity'spolicy and training are allowed under this expansion of the scope. In addition, the jury panel may answer an interrogatory on whether or not the involved officer's actions we consistent with the given jurisdiction's department policy and training. Jury/Panel * Superior Court supplies no more than 6, and no less than 4 jurors (mandated through RCW). • The jury remains an involved party in the inquest hearing, consistent with RCW. Officer Testimony Historically, the involved officer voluntarily testifies attfie inquest hewing. In lieu of the involved officer testifying, the lead investigator will offer testimony to the facts and circumstances of the event. The chief law enforcement officer of a given jurisdiction (or their designee) will address questions of current department policy and training. Subpoena power to compel involved officer testimony will be eliminated. Opening/Closing Statements No opening and closing statements allowed. • Each represented party will have the opportunity to make a statement of summation. Statements will be pre -written and screened by the administrator to ensure they are within the scope of the inquiry. Expert Testimony • Medical Examiner (ME) testifies re: cause and manner of death. CSI detectives testify re: physical evidence at scene and what it shows, e.g., Ballistics, trajectories, etc. • Involved parties may call expert witnessed to speak to issues within the scope of the inquest, e.g. medical examiner, ballistics experts, experts in law enforcement best practices. 1 Public Education and Internal Review . No formal public information materials about inquest process. No annual (or regular) review of process. • The manager within the Department of Executive Services will create and maintain a webpage with an up-to-date schedule of all inquests, any relevant findings, audio recordings of past inquests when possible, and an informational guide that outlines the inquest process. The manager will also submit a report to the County Executive at the end of each year on the operations of the inquests. The County Executive will call for a periodic review of the inquest process by an independent review committee to determine if the inquest process conforms with updated laws and is adequately meeting the principles of transparency, community engagement, and respect for all those involved in the inquest process. Restorative Justice • County does not currently promote or provide restorative justice options/services as a parallel process to the inquest hearing. • The Executive will ensure that the involved parties are directed to resources and processes within the County that are designed to facilitate peace and promote healing, such as, Restorative Justice circles. Where the affected parties agree to participate, these offer the potential for meaningful connection and resolution. Timeline • Ed requires inquest commence within 90 days of Executive's request to the District Court. KCDC may extend the 90 days for good cause. • The 90-day timeline remains. The administrator may extend the 90-day timeline for good cause. Discovery and Evidence ® Introduction of the decedent's criminal history into evidence is not within the current scope of the inquest. • The decedent's criminal history may not be introduced into evidence unless the administrator first determines that it is directly related to the reason for an arrest, detention, or use of force (e.g. officers are arresting an individual convicted of a felony who they believe is carryings firearm). If such information is admitted, it must be limited to the greatest extent possible and may not include specific crime of conviction, the nature of the crime (e.g. violent or nonviolent), the deceased's incarceration history, or any other criminal charge, unless the administrator makes a specific finding of relevance to a contested issue in the inquest; that the evidence of criminal history serves as the basis for an officer safety caution (or equivalent warning); and that the member of the law enforcement agency was aware of the officer safety caution prior to any use of force; or if otherwise, contemporaneous knowledge of the individual's criminal history was relevant to the actions the officer(s) took or how the officer(s) assessed whether the person posed a threat. If such information is admitted, it must be limited to the greatest extent possible, and may only include information both actually known to officer(s) at the time, and actually forming a basis for their decision to use deadly force or their tactics in approaching the individual. If criminal history is introduced into evidence under the above subsections, no information regarding the type of sentence given to the deceased or any other criminal charge may be introduced into the inquest, unless the administrator makes a specific finding of relevance to a contested issue in the inquest. Inquest Findings q g • PAO transmits u• jury's answered interrogatories tothe Executive. The administrator will transmit an inquest panel's findings to the County Executive. The administrator will ensure that the findings and recommendations are published on its website in a timely manner. 2 Interrogatories/Panel Questions • No written explanations currently allowed from jurors. • Interrogatory asking whether or not the officer feared for his or her life at the time of the incident often asked. • After every question, each panelist shall have the opportunity to provide a written explanation of the panelist's answer. The administrator shall direct each panelist that the panelist need only provide a written explanation when the panelist believesthat a written explanation would provide information helpful in explaining or interpreting the panelist's answer. In addition, the jury panel may answer an interrogatory on whether or not the involved officer's actions we consistent with the given jurisdiction's department policy and training. The interrogatory asking whether or not the officer feared for his or her life at the time of the incident will no longer be asked. 3 46 Document Code No.:PHL-7-1,Z'EO ° � Deportnnent/|ssui �CountyExecu�veOf�in ` ��"� Effective Date: October 3 .Z0l8 Approved: /s/Dow Constantine Type ofAction: Supersedes PHi7-I-1(AEO),"Conducting Inquests inKing County" March 16, 2010 0� County �� y WHEREAS, Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 36.24 authorizes the county coroner to summon a jury to inquire into the death of a person by suspicious circumstances; and WHEREAS, Section 895 of the King County Charter, as amended, provides that an inquest shall be held to find facts and review the circumstances of any death involving a member of the law enforcement agency of the county in the performance of the member's duties; and WHEREAS, King County Code(KCC) Chapter2.35A created a division of the medical examiner within the Seattle -King County Department of Public Health and assigned to it most of the coroner's duties under RCW Chapter 36.24, "except for the holding of inquests, which function is vested in the County Executive" under KCC 2.354.090.8iand WHEREAS, the County Executive, inexercising theautboritytohn|dinquests has discretion to determine how inquest proceedings are tobeconducted, and todelegate the duty ofpresiding over an inquest toanother impartial public official; and WHEREAS, the County Executive retains the ultimate responsibility for the exercise of the inquest power and the performance of the delegated duty. NOW, THEREFORE, |, Dow Constantine, King County Executive, do hereby order, direct,and implement the following policy and procedures for conducting an inquest, at appendices I and Dow Constantine N11 A|b � rO erg 47 Document Code No.:PHL-7-I2,BO Conducting Inquests inKing County Page Jof13 Appendix l—Conducting Inquests inKing County. Conducting Inquests inKing County 1.O'SUBJECT TITLE Conducting Inquests inKing County. 3.0.PURPOSE 2.1. To establish policies and procedures for conducting reviews into the facts and circumstances of any death of an individual involving a member of any law enforcement agency within King County while in the performance of the member's duties (and/or the exercise of member'sauthorify],and occasionally inother cases, as determined by the County Executive. 2.2. The purpose of the inquest is to ensure a full, fair, and transparent review of any such death, and to issue findings of fact regarding the facts and circumstances surrounding the death. The review will result in the issuance of findings regarding the cause and manner of death, and whether the law enforcement member acted pursuant to policy and training. 2.3. The purpose of the inquest is not to determine whether the law enforcement member acted in good faith or should be disciplined or otherwise held accountable, or to otherwise find fault, nrtodetermine ifthe use offorce was justified, nrtudetermine civil orcriminal liability. it is acknowledged that the facts determined in the course of the inquest may sometimes have anindirect bearing on'such determinations. 3.0.O0GAN|ZAT|ONSAFFECTED King County Department ofPublic Defense; King County Executive; King County Prosecuting Attorney King County Superior Court; King County Medical Examiner's Office; King County Department of Executive Services; Law Enforcement agencies within King County. 4.0.oBERENCE 4.1.RCVV36.J4Counties; County Coroner. 4.2. King County Charter, Section 320.20 — The Executive Branch, Powers and Duties. 4.3. King County Charter, Section 895 — General Provisions: Mandatory Inquests. 4.4.King County Code 2.35A.09O(B). 48 Document Code No.:PHL-7-1,2'EO Conducting Inquests inKing County Page 3ot1I S'O.DEF|NOOONS 5.1. "King County Executive" or "County Executive" means the official, or the designee of the official, who is elected and serves as the County Executive of King County pursuant to Article 3 ofthe King County Charter. 5.2. "King County Prosecuting Attorney" means the official, or the designee of the official, who iselected and serves asProsecuting Attorney for King County pursuant toArticle XI, Section 5nf the Washington State Constitution. 53,"Inqoest means an administrative, fact-finding inquiry into and review of the manner, facts and circumstances of the death of an individual involving a member of any law enforcement agency within King County while in the performance of his or her duties [and/or the exercise of his or her authority], and occasionally in other cases, as determined by the County Executive, where death occurs in the custody of or in the course of contact with other non -law enforcement government agencies oremployees, 5.4. "Law enforcement agencv" means any agency having police powers as authorized under Washington State law. For the purposes nfthis policy, "a member ofany law enforcement agency" shall mean commissioned officers and non-commissioned staff ofall local and state police forces, jails, and corrections agencies. B"Attorney representing thefamily of the deceased" means oprivately-retained mpublicly funded attorney, pursuant to KC Ordinance 18652. 5.6. "Rules of Evidence" means the evidentiary rules adopted by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington governing proceedings in the courts of the State of Washington, and such rules aSmay beadopted bythe King County Hearing Examiner pursuant toKCCZ8.Zl S.7."Voirdir8~meansanexonninadonpfepro*pectivepane|asdefnedbe1ow' 5.8. "In camera review" means an examination of materials by the administrator in private proceedings to rule an admissibility and use. 5.9."Panel"refers to the jury mfinquest provided by Superior Court pursuant to RCW[hapter 36.24. 5.20."Administrator" means the presider ofthe inquest proceeding, selected from aroster 49 Document Code No,:PHL,7'1'2'8} Conducting Inquests |nKing County Page 4of12 S.I1."K8anoger"means the staff assigned tnoversee the inquest program, toassign an administrator and pro tem attorney to a particular inquest, to provide clerical support to the administrator and pro tem attorney, and to report annually to the County Executive. 5,1L"Pro1emattornev"n?eanstheppoternattorneyaxsignedtoasdsttheadministnaturand tofacilitate aninquest. 6.O.POUOB 6.1. There shall be an inquest into the manner, facts, and circumstances of any death of an individual involving amember ofany law enforcement agency within King County while inthe performance of his or her duties, [and/or the exercise of his or her authority), and in any other case as occasionally determined by the County Executive where death occurs in the custody of or in the course of contact with other non -law enforcement government agencies or employees. 6I.VyhUethetenn"inwdxins"is1obeconstroedbroadk\thpremaybecircumstoncesinwhich law enforcement's no|eissonninimo|aotonutvvarrontaninquest,orwherefnrotherreasons an inquest would impede the administration of justice. Factors to be considered include: whether a decision to prosecute has been made; whether the death was the result of a condition existing prior to and/or apart from the law enforcement involvement; whether the individual was incustody atthe time ofthe death; whether the family ofthe deceased desires an inquest; and any other factor that touches on the connection between the manner of death and the actions of law enforcement. However, the public has a strong interest in a full and transparent review ofthe circumstances surrounding the death of an individual involving law enforcement, ooaninquest 'will ordinarily 6eheld. 6.3. At the discretion of the County Executive, in exceptional circumstances there may be an inquest into the causes and circumstances of a death involving an individual in King County other than a member of a law enforcement agency. 7.0. RESPONSIBILITIES 7.1. The King County Prosecuting Attorney shall inform the King County Executive whenever an investigation into a death involving a member of any law enforcement agency in King County is complete and also advise whether an inquest should be initiated pursuant to the King County Charter. If the King County Prosecuting Attorney advises that an inquest may be initiated, the King County Prosecuting Attorney and the pro tem staff attorney shall (a) supply a complete copy of the investigative file to the manager; (b) respond to public records requests for the investigative file; and (c) issue subpoenas to witnesses and/or for records at the administrator's request. 50 Document Code Nn.:PHL-7-1,Z-EO Conducting Inquests inKing County Page Sof12 7.IThe King County Executive shall determinewhether aninquest will beheld. |foninquest is to be held, the Executive shall direct an administrator conduct the inquest on the Executive's behalf. The County Executive shall also request that the King County Superior Court facilitate the inquest by supplying (a) jury, which shall be referred to as a panel; and (b) appropriate facilities, including a courtroom, bailiff, reporter, and any necessary security, The inquest shall be conducted pursuant to this Executive Order and to RCW 36.24, as amended. Q.O.PROCEQURES Action By: Prosecuting Attorney 8.1. Receives information from o law enforcement agency within King County of a death of an individual involving law enforcement that may require an inquest. 8.Z.Promptly informs the County Executive ofsuch adeath. 8.3. Reviews the information and the investigative file and advises the County Executive as to whether aninquest should beheld, 8.4, Upon request of the County Executive, forwards the investigative file to the manager. O.S.Upon request byanadministrator, issues subpoenas for witnesses and/or documents; except that a subpoena shall not be issued to the individual law enforcement officer who was directly involved in an individual's death while in the performance of his or her duties [and/or the exercise ofhis orher authnrity]. Action By: County Executive 8`6.Upon receiving the King County Prosecuting /41tornev' advisory opinion, determine whether tohold aninquest. 8.7. Ifaninquest istobeheld, idirect the manager toproceed with the inquest. Action By: Manager 8.8.5e|ec an administrator to preside over the inquest and a pro tem staff attorney to assist, 8.9. Support the administrator in scheduling a pre -inquest conference and with clerical tasks. Action y� m8 Administrator ra �t to r 8.10. Hold apre'inqvestconference. 51 Document Code No.:PHL-7-1-2'EO Conducting Inquests inKing County Page 6 of 12 8.11. Conduct the inquest according to the procedures in Appendices I and 2. Action By: Department of Public Defense 8.12. Assign counsel for the family of the decedent unless the family indicates they have retained other inquest counsel or do not wish to be represented by the King County Department of Public Defense. The Department of Public Defense will not be assigned in inquests where the family is to be represented by private counsel. Action By: Superior Court O.I3.|faninquest ixtobeheld, the Superior Court shall coordinate with the manager and administrator to supply a panel, recorder, and facilities pursuant to RCW 36.24.020. 9.0.APPEND|CE3 Procedures for Conducting Inquests. l0.0.PRIOR ORDERS ThisExecUtiveOrderrescindsandrep|acesPHL7-l'1(AEO),"Cnnducting|nquastsinKing County," dated March 16, 2010. Appendix 2 — Procedures for Conducting Inquests |faninquest istubeheld, the King County administrator shaUcnnductthereveyvinaconrdance with these procedures. 1.0. FACILITIES/COURTROOM 1.1. The inquest is an administrative hearing intended to be a fact-finding, non -adversarial process. However, the King County Superior Court administers the jury process and maintains facilities appropriate to comfortably support a jury. Therefore, where requested by the County Executive, the Superior Court will coordinate with the manager to provide persons to serve as a jury of inquest ("panel") and secure appropriate facilities. The manager shall arrange the room in a manner that promotes transparency to the public and fair treatment of all participating parties, 2'0" PARTICIPATING PARTIES 2.1. The family of the deceased, who shall be allowed to have an attorney(s) present. 52 Document Code No'/PHL-7-1'%-EO Conducting Inquests inKing County Page 7 of 12 2.2. The law enforcement member(s) involved in the death, who shall be allowed to have an attorney(s) present, provided that the law enforcement member(s) elect(s) to participate in the inquest proceeding. 2.3.The employing government department, which shall beallowed toberepresented by its statutory attorney or lawfully appointed designee. 2.4. The manager, who shall assign an administrator and a pro tem attorney to assist the administrator. 2.5. An administrator, who shall preside over the inquest. 3.0.ROLE OFTHE ADMINISTRATOR/SCOPE OFTHE INQUEST 3.1. An administrator shall conduct the inquest. The proceedings are quasi-judicial in nature, with represented parties, and the presentation ofevidence through direct and cnxs* exarnination, and subject to the Rules of Evidence. Administrators shall strive to promote an atmosphere consistent with administrative fact-finding and shall strive to minimize delay, cost, and burden to participants, while promoting fair and open proceedings. Although an inquest is not a court proceeding, administrators shall be guided by open courts principles and GR 16. l2.The administrator, after consultation with the participating parties,shaUdeterminethe inquest scope. Consistent with the purpose as set forth in the amended Charter, Executive Order, and Appendix 1 and 2, the inquest scope shall include an inquiry into and the panel shall make findings regarding the cause, manner, and circumstances of the death, including applicable law enforcement agency policy. The panel shall make findings regarding whether the law enforcement officer complied with applicable law enforcement agency training and policy asthey relate tothe death. 3.3. The Rules of Evidence shall generally apply, but may be supplemented and/or modified by additional rules governing administrative proceedings, at the discretion of the administrator. The administrator shall construe the Rules of Evidence in a manner consistent with the goal of administrative fact-finding proceedings and to promote fairness and to minimize the delays, costs, and burdens that can beassociated with judicial proceedings. 4.0. DISCOVERY AND ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE 4.1. Discoverable material shall be exchanged among: the administrator and any pro tem attorney; the attorney representing the family of the deceased; the attorney representing the jurisdiction employing the involved law enforcement rnember(s);and the attorney representing 53 Document Code No.:PHL,7'1,3,EO Conducting Inquests 1nKing County Page 8ofl2 4.2. Discovery materials are to be used by the attorneys solely for the inquest proceeding. Such materials include the police and/or agency investigative fi|eUftheincNentthat/esultedinthe death, They also include the report of the medical examiner, crime laboratory reports, and the names, addresses, and summaries and/or copies of statements of any witnesses obtained by any party. 4.I|nthe event that confidential materials inthe possessionnfany person oraRencya/e sought for use in the inquest, the administrator, upon a prima facie showing of necessity, relevancy, and lack ofanalternative source for the materials, shall examine the materials 1n camera. These materials may include, and the administrator shall have the discretion to consider the admissibility and use of, information that may be relevant to the incident. The legal representative of the person or agency in possession of the materials shall have the right to participate in the review of these materials, 4.4.The decedent's criminal history may not beintroduced into evidence unless the administrator first determines that: itisdirectly related to the reason for an arrest, detention, or use of force (e.g. officers were arresting an individual convicted of a felony who they believed was carrying a firearm); it served asthe basis for anofficer safety caution (or equivalent warning) that the member(s) of the law enforcement agency was aware of prior to any use of force; or other, contemporaneous knowledge of the individual's criminal history was relevant to the actions the officer(s) took or how the officer(s) assessed whether the person posed a threat. 4,5.|fdecedent's criminal history is admitted, ¢ must belimited tVthe greatest extent possible, /tmay only include information both actually known tonffier(s) at the time, and actually forming a basis for the decision to use deadly force or the tactics in approaching the individual. It may not include the specific crime of conviction, the nature of the crime (e.g. violent or nonviolent), the deceased's incarceration history, or any other criminal charge, unless the administrator makes a specific finding of relevance to a contested issue in the inquest. 4.6. The disciplinary history of the law enforcement member(s) involved may not be introduced into evidence unless the administrator first determines that it is directly related to the use of force. if such information is admitted, it must be limited to the greatest extent possible. 4.7. Protective orders may be used to limit discovery, and the administrator may order the return of all discretionarily-ordered discovery. 5.0. SCHEDULE AND PRE -INQUEST CONFERENCE 5.1. It is in the best interests of affected parties and the community to hold the inquest in a 54 Document Code No.:PHL-7-1-2'EO Conducting Inquests inKing County Page Snf12 unnecessary delays; extensions shall belimited and granted on|yuponashowin8of8nod cause. 5.2. The manager and administrator shall schedule pre -inquest conference with the participating parties and may hold additional conferences ifnecessary. The administrator will obtain proposed witness and exhibit lists, proposed panel instructions, and inquest time estimates, and will inquire whether any special needs such as interpreters are required. The conference shall be public unless compelling circumstances require an in camera hearing, in which case the administrator must make findings of fact and conclusions of law justifying such measures under Washington law. S.3,The administrator shall solicit proposed stipulations offact from the participating parties and work diligently to narrow the scope of inquiry at the inquest. The administrator shall share the stipulated facts with the panel atthe start ofthe inquest. 5.4. The administrator shall instruct the panel at the start of the inquest. 5.5. The manager shall maintain a website publishing the schedule for the inquest,stipulated facts, inquest file and, where possible, inquest recordings. 6.0. PANEL POOL The administrator shall select the panel from the regular Superior Ccfurtjuror pool pursuant to R[W]6.24.0ZO. 7.O.PANEL QUESTIONING (VO|RDIRE) 7.1. The administrator shall conduct voir dire, after consultation with the participating parties. 7.2. There is no set limit to the number of panelists the administrator may excuse. Panelists may be excused for cause and/or because serving on the inquest panel will present a hardship, 8.0. PANEL QUESTIONS FOR PARTICIPANTS After all parties have had anopportunity toexamineaeitness,pane|ist are allowed 1osubmit questions to the administrator that the panel wishes to pose to the witness. After consultation with the parties, the administrator shall determine whether to submit a question to the witness and the manner ofthe submission. 55 Document Code Nn:PHL-7-1'Z'[D Conducting Inquests inKing County Page IDof12 9.0.0ECOND|NG The manager shall ensure that the inquest proceedings are audio recorded and that the audio recordings are made accessible tuthe public tnthe greatest extent consistent with GRl6 1D.O.MEDIA GUIDELINES Consistent with Section 9, above, the administrator shall make the proceedings available to the public and tothe media, this` includes video and audio recording and still photography. 11.0. ORDER OF PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE 11.1. There shall be no opening statements by the parties. The judge's introduction will include an instruction in substantially the following form: "You have been empaneled as members of a coroner's panel in the inquest. This is not a trial. The purpose of the inquest is to provide public inquiry- into the causes and circumstances surrounding the death of [decedent]. It is not the purpose of this inquest to determine the criminal or civil liability of any person or agency. Your role will be to hear the evidence and answer questions according to instructions given to you at the close ofthe proceedings. The pro tern staff attornev'srole is solely tnassist the administrator in presenting the evidence. Asadministrator | have determined who will be called aswitnesses and the issues which you will beasked tmconsider." 2I,2.The administrator through the pro tern attorney has the first opportunity t0introduce witnesses and evidence. The parties may then each introduce their own witnesses and evidence, I1.lThe administrator, after consultation with the parties, decides the order ofpresentation ofevidence and witnesses. The administrator may direct that the pro temattorney conduct the initial examination of each witness. 11.4. The administrator shall make rulings on the admissibility of evidence and testimony based on the Rules of Evidence and these procedures. 12.0. WITNESSES AND TESTIMONY 12.1.Each party, including the administrator, through the pro tem staff attorney, may proffer its own witnesses to provide testimony that aids the panel in the understanding of the facts, including factual areas of experts (e.g. ballistics and forensic medical examination). 12.2. The administrator shall base rulings on the admissibility of such testimony on the 56 Document Code Nn.:PHL-7cI-2-EQ Conducting Inquests inKing County Page 11or13 regarding changes that should be made to existing policy, procedure, and training is not 12.3. The employing government department shall designate an official(s) to provide a comprehensive overview ofthe forensic investigation into the incident /e.g,statements collected by investigators, investigators' review of forensic evidence, physical evidence collected byinvestigators, etc,\.Additionally, the chief law enforcement officer nfthe involved agency nrdirector ofthe employing government department shall provide testimony concerning applicable law enforcement agency training and policy as they relate to the death but may not comment on whether employees' actions related to the death were pursuant to training and policy; or any conclusions about whether the employee's actions were within policy and training. 12.4. The inquest is intended to be a transparent process to inform the public of the circumstances of the death of a person that involved a representative of government, As such, there is a strong presumption against the exclusion of witnesses until after their testimony, and relevant, non -cumulative witnesses should only be excluded by the administrator in exceptional circumstances. 1Z�.A1the conclusion ofthe testimony, the administrator will solicit from the pro tem attorney and/or from the participating parties additional submissions nfproposed stipulated facts. The administrator will determine which, |fany, proposed stipulated facts should be submitted tothe panel. 13.0.STATEMENTS OFSUMMATION The pro temattorney and the participating parties may offer statements cfsummation only if proapprovmd by the administrator in consultation with the parties. Statements must be consistent with the fact-finding purpose of the inquest and must not suggest conclusions of law orbear onfault. 14.0. PANEL QUESTIONS 14.1. After the conclusion of testimony, each party shall submit to the administrator proposed questions for the panel. After consultation with the parties, the administrator shall determine which questions are within the scope of the inquest and should be submitted to the panel. Prior to the statements of summation, the administrator shall provide the panel with the list of 14.2. The inquest administrator shall give written instructions to the panel and shall submit questions tobeanswered, subject tothe limitations ofSection 3 (above) and keeping inmind the purpose of an inquest. The administrator shall instruct the panel that it may not comment onfault, oronjustification —including the mental state ofthe involved offcec(s),such as 57 Document Code Nc\:PHL-7'1-2'EO Conducting Inquests inKing County Page I2ot12 whether the officer thought the decedent posed a threat of death or serious bodily injury to the officer(s)—or on the criminal or civil liability of a person or agency. 14.3. Beyond these limitations, the panel shall not be confined tothe stipulated facts, but may consider any testimony or evidence presented during the inquest proceeding. In answering any question, the panel may not consider any information learned outside of the inquest. 14.4. Questions submitted tothe panel must provide three response options: ��"no," and "unknewn."Apanelist shall respond 'ye5"when the panelist believes apreponderance nfthe evidence supports responding to the question in the affirmative. A panelist shall respond If no when the panelist believes a preponderance of the evidence supports responding to the question in the negative. A panelist shall respond "unknown" if either (1) the weight ofthe evidence equally supports responding to the question in the affirmative and the negative or (2) not enough evidence was presented to allow the panelist to answer the question in the affirmative orthe negative. 14.5. The panel shall deliberate and panelists shall exchange their interpretations of the evidence. However, the panel need not reach unanimity and each panelist shall beinstructed to answer the questions individually. 14.6. After every question, each panelist shall have the opportunity to provide a written explanation of the panelist's answer. The administrator shall direct each panelist that the panelist need only provide a written explanation when the panelist believes that a written explanation would provide information helpful in explaining or interpreting the panelist's answer. 15.0.RNDINEG 15.1. The manager shall transmit the panel's findings to the County Executive. 15.2. The manager shall ensure the findings and recommendations are published on its website along with the inquest recording. 16.O.ANNUAL REVIEW 16.1. The manager shall submit areport tothe County Executive atthe end nfeach year onthe operations nfinquests. 16.2. The County Executive will call for a periodic review of the inquest process by an independent review committee to determine if the inquest process is conforming to updated laws and adequately meeting the principles of transparency, community engagement, and 58 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFOR ATIONAL E ORANDU TO: Finance & Safety Committee FROM: Bruce Linton, Chief of Police BY: Eric Dreyer, Deputy Chief of Police DATE: October 8th, 2018 SUBJECT: Police Department 2019-2020 Proposed Budget ISSUE As provided for in the budget process approved by the Finance and Safety Committee, Council Committees will be reviewing budget sections prior to review by the full Council. The Finance section of the budget is ready for review by the Finance and Safety Committee. BACKGROUND The Police Department strives to be a premier, full -service department that is committed to creating a safe and livable community. We achieve this standard through the work of highly trained personnel who are responsible to the community they serve and who create and maintain successful partnerships and uphold public trust. DISCUSSION The proposed budget for the Police Department is increased by the following amounts: • 2019 (over 2018) $428,565 [+2.26%] • 2020 (over 2019) $288,302 [+1.48%] Changes from 2017-2018 Budget • Organization Chart titles and positions have been updated to better reflect the Police Department's operating structure. • Salaries/Benefits have been increased by $163,786 (+1.16%) in 2019 and $386,715 (+2.70%) for 2020. Included in our FTEs are the following positions: o Auto Theft Task Force Detective — Salary, most Personnel Benefits, and all ATTF-related Overtime reimbursed at 100% o VNET Detective — All VNET-Related Overtime is reimbursed at 100% o Records Disposition Specialist — Salaries & Benefits reimbursed at an effective rate of about 90`)/0 • Supplies have been increased $76,500 (+38.28%) in 2019 and decreased by $30,000 (-10.86%) for 2020. This is due, in large part, to the following factors: a. The Department's Quartermaster budget was moved from Services (R&M) to Supplies (O&OS) in 2019. This increased our Supplies budget while decreasing Services. b. Other Supplies lines were decreased to meet the City's budget reduction request. • Services have been increased by $176,578 (+10.47%) for 2019 and then decreased by $188,692 (-10.13%) for 2020. The 2019 increase is mostly due to a climb in Fleet Transfers ($263,842 increase) as well as increases for Axon (Vehicle and Officer -worn Cameras) and Spillman (Department Database and Reporting) annual maintenance fees (together the Axon and Spillman annual fees represent $100,000 in budget). o The decrease in 2020 is due to Fleet Transfers dropping their expected transfer by $202,617. 59 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 The 2019/20 Services group also includes an increase of $34,000 as an investment in our Recruiting, Hiring, and Pre -Employment Processing efforts. • Intergovernmental budgets have been adjusted to reflect changes to our Animal Control, SCORE Jail, and ValleyComm contracts. • Capital Expenditures: The Department is budgeting for a Patrol K9 Officer for 2020. The budgeted amount is to cover the purchase of the canine, training, and boarding. Additional details on the proposed budget are included in the proposed budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Public Safety Committee forward this section of the budget to the Committee of the Whole for review. If there are no recommended changes, Council consensus will be requested to move this departmental budget forward to the final budget package in October. ATTACHMENTS Draft Police department 2019-2020 Proposed Budget 60 Police Department ou loiter m t tot.' ra Patrol m� m » P 6 , ± uOffice St Serceant m I It e«m Traffic Son w Support iE OF d § Pdiett «1 Evidence tItt Iona � s , 2 + nwm TAC Sert,ted, m o t IVC Ai Theft aD m Tratrtfttg Officer A 61 62 DEPARTMENT: Police (10) FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description FUND NUMBER: 000 POSITION: Chief of Police The Police Department strives to be a premier, full -service department that is committed to creating a safe and livable community. We achieve this standard through the work of highly -trained personnel who are responsible to the community they serve and who create and maintain successful partnerships and uphold public trust. 2017-2018 Accomplishments • Improved public safety by strengthening community trust and legitimacy. Strategic Goal 5 • Accomplished through outreach efforts and community meetings. • Implemented new technologies and social media to provide opportunities to better engage and educate our communities. Strategic Goal 1 • Implemented on-line reporting within the structure of our new records management system. • Facilitated leadership training for all department employees. Strategic Goal 4 • Established Community Engagement Teams for addressing specific community concerns in designated districts. Strategic Goal 5 2019-2020 Outcome Goals • As one of the six pillars from the report of the President's Task Force on 21 st Centuty Policing, the Tukwila Police Department will endeavor to build trust and legitimacy through engagement with the community. Strategic Goal 5 • Provide training and programs to department members to improve Officer Safety and Wellness. Strategic Goal 4 • Focus on recruitment and retention strategies to address department staffing shortage. Strategic Goal 1 • With the current Police Department 5-year strategic plan concluding at the end of 2019, conduct an analysis of the current strategic plan and produce a new 5-year strategic plan based on the findings. Strategic Goal 4 • Leverage technology to improve workplace efficiency and communication. Strategic Goal 4 63 2O1g-202QIndicators ofSuccess Improved public safety by building ooDlnlUOhv trust and legitimacy. # Worked with faith -based organizations to foster additional non -enforcement engagements with our communities. + Increased collaboration/communication with bUSiO8GseS and communities regarding targeted traffic enforcement and emphasis patrol goals within their communities. + Integration of our policy OnanU@| and other police related information on the department websit8. * People feel safe and trust the officers that police their community. * Trained all employees oncurrent and new Department technologies. + Integrated social media OOh. TxVitter, Snap Chat, YOUTube...\ as port of the department's daily public engagement strategy. + Implemented on-line reporting within the structure of our new [eCV[do management system. * The community feels that they are informed and have a positive image of the Police Department. � Bea high performing organization by facilitating leadership training for all department employees. + |n)p[Ov8d internal communication. + Provided values -based leadership training for a||erDp|oyoeo. * Encouraged ohealthy and engaged workforce. + Improve our current organizational structure tObest support our vision, mission values and strategic plan. * Established aPeer Support Team. w Established 8 department wellness program that includes resiliency training. + All budgeted positions filled. 64 Budget Change Discussion Salaries & Benefits COLA increases were applied to oo|oheo and benefits were adjusted to account for changes in healthcare and retirement. Supplies The Department Quartermaster Budget was moved from Services to Supplies, resulting in an increase in Supplies Budget and a decrease in Services Budget. Services Annual maintenance fees for Axonvehicle and Spillman (department database andreporting) were the largest contributors for increases, along with additional investments in recruiting and hiring budgets. Intergovernmental /\ninl81 control was adjusted to account for an increase in the regional animal services control service contract. Capital: $30,000 was added in 2020 for the acquisition of K9 police dog. Expenditure Summary Police Department Expenditures oyProgram *ctuu/ Budget Percent Change 2016 eoir Projected xVm 2018 e019 eoen 2018-19 2019-20 Administration $ 2'344.811 $ 2,056.519 $ 2.124.866 n 1.963.093 $ 2.490,846 $ 2.575,844 26.84% 3.41% Patrol 7.841.346 7,975.786 8.234,430 0.*36,208 8.247.337 8.313.100 -2.24% 0.80% Special Operations 1.308.337 1,344.493 2.76% Support Operations 1.119.000 1,112,1e7 1.133,808 1^393.844 1.389.054 1.438,085 -0.29m 3.47m Investigations 2.2/1.507 2.149.103 2.141.019 2.202.519 2.283,109 o.zro/wu 166% '0.18% Tumw|axnU'cdme 642.153 812.805 837.011 869.025 1.064.587 1.075,408 2u.50m 1.00Y6 Professional Standards 1.754`667 1 4snU34 1.020.576 2066.539 264.069 263.674 '87.22% '0,15m Training 280342 286,589 305,923 291.273 273.228 276.800 '020% 1.31% Traffic 1^591.871 1.622.253 1`028,579 1.775,e48 2.106.237 2.149,571 18,60m 2.06% oepartnontToto| $1r.oa5,007 $17,*n1.085 $1n.oeo,81u $1u.00y`o4n $19,427.61* $1y.715,A1s 2.26% t*om Police Department ` Expenditures ovType 4otuo| Budget Percent Change 2016 2017 pnVncteu 2018 eom 2019 xnuo 2018'19 2019-20 Salaries &Wages $ 9.551.874 $ 9.758.080 $ 9.878,974 $10.388998 $ 10'536,551 $10,8*5,721 1.42% 2.93% Personnel Benefits 3.342.336 3.321.247 3.466.800 3.786.835 3.803.128 3.880.671 o.*a% 2,04% Supplies 237,388 314.882 301.302 1e9.850 276,350 246.350 38.28% -10.86% Services 1o64oza 1.395.758 1.607.186 1.686,234 1.862.812 1.674.120 10.*7% -10.13% mtorgn�.Svcs mTaxes 2.453.692 2.690.518 2.772.491 2'937,074 2.948.775 3.039,05* n./nm 3.06% Capital Outlays 706.179 (p) 30.000 O.00% Department Total $17,Vo5,6nr *17,^u1.Voo *1o,oco`n10 $18,nyg.o^y $1y.^u7,o1^ $ 19.715,916 2.26% 1.48% 65 Department Detail Staffing and Expenditure by Program PROGRAMS FTE BUDGET YEAR-TO-YEAR PERCENT CHANGE 2019 % of Total Budget 2020 % of Tote I Budget 2019-20 Police Patrol Services 36.00 6,193,468 31.9% 6,204,936 31.5% 0.2% Felony and Sexual Crimes Unit (MCU) 15,25 2,372,340 12.2% 2,369,808 12.0% (0.11%) Detention and Incarceration Services 0.80 1,718,823 8.8% 1,772,842 9.0% 3.1% Front Office & Records Management 10.80 1,237,862 6.4% 1,280,999 6.5% 3.5% Dispatching Services 0.00 1,177,353 6.1% 1,212,591 6.2% 3.0% Community Policing Team 7.60 1,154,087 5.9% 1,186,965 6.0% 2.8% Police Management and Administration 4.00 1,062,421 5.5% 1,065,335 5.4% 0.3% Narcotics & Street Crimes Team (TAC) 4.60 829,229 4.3% 846,637 4.3% 2.1% Traffic Enforcement and Crash Investigation Team 4.95 821,787 4.2% 823,707 4.2% 0.2% Department Training Program 1.95 444,088 2.3% 454,918 2,3% 2.4% School Resource Officer Program 2.00 287,628 1.5% 298,293 1.5% 3.7% Critical Incidents and SWAT (SWAT & Negotiations) 1.20 216,454 1.1% 225,027 1.1% 4.0% Professional Standards 1.00 209,565 1.1% 212,755 1.1% 1.5% Evidence & Property Management 1.20 207,353 1.1% 214,791 1.1% 3.6% Public and Community Relations 1.50 192,528 1.0% 197,157 1.0% 2.4% Contracted Off -Duty Security 0.00 174,956 0.9% 174,956 0.9% - Auto Theft Task Force 1.00 141,638 0.7% 145,318 0.7% 2.6% PD Budget/Finance 1.00 139,589 0.7% 142,397 0.7% 2.0% VNET (Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team) 1.00 132,071 0,7% 136,752 0.7% 3.5% Police K9 Program (Tracking &Sniffing) 0.85 131,240 0.7% 163,863 0.8% 24.9% Animal Control 0.00 125,000 0.6% 131,250 0.7% 5.0% Recruiting & Hiring (Pre -Employment) 0.50 114,577 0.6% 118,172 0.6% 3.1% Mutual Aid & Large Scale Incident (Response &Planning) 0.20 96,676 0.5% 86,534 0.4% (10.49%) PD Quartermaster 0.00 90,000 0.5% 90,000 0.5% - Civil Disturbance Unit 0.35 56,711 0.3% 58,795 0.3% 3.7% Police Camera Program (Vehicle & Body Worn) 0.00 51,000 0.3% 51,000 0.3% - Traffic Safety Cameras 0.25 36,169 0.2% 37,118 0.2% 2.6% PD Fitness Initiative 0.00 13,000 0.1% 13,000 0.1% - PROGRAM TOTALS 98.00 19,427,613 100.0% 19,715,917 99.7% 1.5% *Priority Based Budgeting was implemented beginning with the 2019 - 2020 biennium budget. Therefore, no historical data is available. Program Descriptions Police Patrol Services: Police Patrol Services is responsible for responding to the immediate needs of the Tukwila community. By providing a constant presence, both during and between calls for service, this program houses the City's law enforcement first responders. The employees assigned to this program are also tasked with nearly all facets of police work, requiring a high-level of expertise and training. Felony and Sexual Crimes Unit (MCU): This program houses our Major Crimes Unit, whose primary responsibility is to investigate a wide variety of crimes, including homicide, robbery, burglary, felony assault, crimes against children and the elderly, felony theft, fraud, forgery, sexual assault, missing persons, and matters relating to registered sex offenders. 66 Detention and Incarceration Services: This program covers all tasks and responsibilities associated with bringing offenders to justices including the management of our relationships with jails, courts, and all probation programs. Front Office and Records Management: This program is tasked with ensuring that the Police Department's case report data are entered correctly into multiple State and Federal databases and that public records requests are received and managed in compliance with State and Federal laws. The program also ensures that officers in the street (both Tukwila as well as other agencies) are provided with a high-level of support ranging from database queries to verification of warrants. Dispatching Services: The City contracts with Valley Communications Center to provide dispatching services. Community Policing Team: The Community Policing Team (CPT) is a proactive team with a main goal of establishing a relationship between the Tukwila Police, residents, and business owners, allowing for a more proactive police role in the community. Patrolling on foot, bicycles, and via traditional vehicles, the team partners with community groups to identify opportunities for cooperation and increased safety. Police Management and Administration: This Program houses the Police Department's Administration team, whose goal it is to provide high-level leadership to the Police Department's employees and to ensure that the City's strategic goals and objectives are communicated to and followed by each employee. Narcotics and Street Crimes Team: This program's primary responsibility is to investigate drug and prostitution related crimes that affect the citizenry of Tukwila. The unit also addresses other crimes as assigned, often relying on special equipment and undercover skills to conduct those investigations. Employees assigned to this program also participate with a variety of local, State, and Federal investigators in an effort to curb crime using combined resources. Traffic Enforcement and Crash Investigation Team: This program houses the Police Department's Traffic Unit, which investigates serious traffic incidents and is tasked with enforcing the City's roadway laws. Department Training Program: The Department Training Program coordinates and tracks all training conducted for the Department. For new officers, this means coordinating their academy experience. For existing staff, the state requires all officers to attend 24 hours of in-service training every year. In the Department's effort to provide highly -trained personnel to the community we serve, that requirement is often greatly exceeded. School Resource Officer: This program provides additional presence and a shortened response time to the City's public schools as well as to foster better communications and relationships between students, faculty, and the Police department. Police Patrol Services: Police Patrol Services is responsible for responding to the immediate needs of the Tukwila community. By providing a constant presence, both during and between calls for service, this program houses the City's law enforcement first responders. The employees assigned to this program are also tasked with nearly all facets of police work, requiring a high-level of expertise and training. Felony and Sexual Crimes Unit (MCU): This program houses our Major Crimes Unit, whose primary responsibility is to investigate a wide variety of crimes, including homicide, robbery, burglary, felony 67 assault, Chnlea against children and the e|derly, felony theft, fraud, forgery, sexual assault, missing persons, and matters relating to registered sex offenders. Detention and Incarceration Services: This program covers all tasks and responsibilities associated with bringing to justices including the management of our relationships with jails, courts, and all probation programs. Front Office and Records MonaqenleOt: This program is tasked with ensuring that the Police Department's case report data are entered correctly into multiple State and Federal databases and that public records requests are received and managed in compliance with State and Federal |8vVs. The program also ensures 'that officers in the street (both Tukwila as well as other agencies) are provided with 8 high-level of support ranging from database queries to verification of warrants. [iSp@tdhinq Services: The City contracts with Valley CoDO0lUniC8U0nS Center to provide dispatching services. - Community Policing Team: The CODlDlU is a proactive team with 8 main goal of establishing a relationship between the TUkVvUG POlice, resideOtS, and business DVVOers, allowing for a more proactive police role in the community. Patrolling on fQOƒ, bicyc|es, and via traditional yehiC|eS, the team partners with community groups to identify opportunities for cooperation and increased safety, Police MaD8OenleOt and Administration: This Program houses the Police Department's Administration te8nn, vVhO8e goal it is to provide high-level leadership to the Police Department's employees and to ensure that the City'S strategic QOa|S and objectives are communicated to and followed by each employee. Narcotics and Street Crimes Team: This p[ogram's primary responsibility is to investigate drug and prostitution na|ohed crimes that affect the citizenry Of Tukwila. The unit also addresses other crimes as assigned, often relying on special equipment and undercover skills to conduct those investigations. Employees assigned to this program also participate with 8 variety of |oc8|. State, and Federal investigators iO@neffort tQcurb crime using combined resources. Traffic Enforcement and Crash |nVestiqetionTeam: This programhouses the Police Department's Traffic Unit. which investigates SedOUS traffic incidents and is tasked with enforcing the Cih/SnoaH»on« |aVVS. Department T[oiOiOO PFOqranl: The Department Training FzR}gr80 coordinates and tracks all training conducted for the Department, For new offiC8[S, this nl8anS coordinating their ac8d8nlV experience. For existing St8ff, the state requires all officers to attend 24 hours of in-service training every year. In the Department's effort to provide highly -trained personnel to the community we oerVe, that requirement is often greatly exceeded. P[} BudOet/Finanoe: Provides analytical and budgetary assistance to the Chief'o office and acts as a liaison between the C|ty'SFinance department and Police department. VNET(V@UayNarcotics Enforcement Te@nl) The mission Dfthis program iatntarget majornarcotic rings that are operating in the South King County area. Police K8PrOgr8nO(SOUfOqand Trackinq):The Police Department leverages the heightened SenSeSof man's best friend to aid in the capture of dangerous offenders, to recover hidden evidence, and to detect 68 Animal Control: The City contracts with King County Animal Control to provide these services. Recruiting and Hiring: This program is tasked with finding, attracting, evaluating, and hiring top talent. Mutual Aid and Large -Scale Incident (Response and Planning): As a part of a mutual aid agreement, the Department participates in events that exceed the limits of other local jurisdictions. Police Department Quartermaster Program: This program is tasked with ensuring that Police Department employees and teams are properly equipped with the clothing, tools, and supplies necessary for their assigned tasks. Civil Disturbance Unit: This team responds to the need of any city in the region that requires a well -trained and organized police presence proficient in crowd control for any type of large protest or gathering. Police Camera Program (Vehicle and Body Worn): Ensures that every patrol vehicle and patrol officer is equipped with audio and video recording hardware and software in an effort to capture evidence of crimes and to provide additional transparency into how our officers interact with the public. Traffic Safety Cameras: This program seeks to provide for a safer community by assisting the City's existing Police Officers with their enforcement of certain traffic laws through the use of technology coupled with oversight by a trained officer. Police Department Fitness Initiative: The goal of this program is to provide the Police Department's Employees with an opportunity to safely and effectively improve their physical and mental health through individual and supervised exercise efforts. 69 Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits Salaries are based on 8ctUG| costs for existing positions and include g cost of living 8diUatnlert per contract agreements. Police Department - --' -~-' - - -- - Position -- 2018 FrE - - omn rTs eo�Buuev�u Salaries Benefits onin pTE uouo�vo v�� o Salaries Benefits Police Chief 1 1 $ 165.260 $ 48.355 1 m 168.696 50.156 Deputy Police Chief 1 1 155.891 31.234 1 158.5** 32.196 Police Commander o 4 567.571 194.374 4 598,550 203.1*1 Police |nfo,maUonOmcer/Rouruuo, o 1 94.*32 37.338 1 97.266 no 118 Public Safety Budget Analyst p 1 98,690 38^749 1 100'515 4O 110 Crime Analyst V 1 8*.8*4 34.845 1 86.448 36.069 Community o,irmeo Policing Coordinator 1 1 90.415 27.200 1 92.136 28,014 xomatunt tothe Chief of Police 1 1 77.970 32,407 1 79.512 33,57* Police Sergeant 11 10 1.149.184 50*.e76 10 1.173.849 43e.730 Police Officer 62 59 5.717,356 2,082,709 nu 5.881.644 2.180,073 Domestic Violence Advocate 1 1 78.221 33,505 1 80.136 34.791 Administrative Assistant 2 u 114,846 54.3e0 2 120,552 57`1*0 Support Operations Senior Manager 1 1 � 111.315 48.247 1 118`962 51,117 Police Records Supervisor 1 1 oo.o*n 34.13e 1 82,606 35.*40 Police Information Analyst 1 o o Police Records Specialist a V 555`623 231.071 e 573.567 2*1,065 sugnnaoTochnmian 1 1 73.171 27.634 1 m`oon 28,572 mocoma oiponn|onspemoi|o\ o 1 43,680 17.195 1 46,301 18.226 VmETomoct|xe n 1 99.724 40,679 1 101^616 42.467 Police Support Officer 1 1 60,335 36,500 1 64.628 38.7+2 Auto Theft Task Force Detective n 1 e9.724 40.679 1 101.616 42.*67 Retiree Medical n n 106`000 0 - 100.000 Extra Labor n o 15.600 1.546 V 15.000 1.5*6 Overtime u ' n 768.4e5 76.158 0 76e,495 76.158 Kelly/Holiday pay o n 234'063 23.196 o 25e.915 25,758 Department Total or 88 $ 10.536.551 $ 3.803'125 oo * 10.845,721 * 3,880,673 70 Expenditure Detail - Supplies, Services and Other Supplies include small tools and equipment; professional services and contractinclude travel, equipment replacement and OW chargeD, insurance subscriptions and memberships, among others. '-- ' Account Name Actual Budget 2016 2017 Projected 2010 2018 2019 000V Oa|ohea $ 8.418\712 $ 8.700,593 $ 8,587.367 $ 9.259.438 $ 9.518.393 $ 9.801.712 Extra Labor ' 858 15,600 15.600 Overtime 025.216 845.730 1.059885 928.495 768.485 768495 KeUy/Ho||dayPay 207.947 211.499 231.721 201.065 234003 259915 F|Q4 714.058 756.012 738.258 770.554 882.451 866.383 Pension LEDFF 434.207 450.010 465.288 484.000 499.714 467`095 Pension PERS 130.199 143.903 152.499 148.089 161.118 167.037 Industrial Insurance 212.221 189.411 217.085 299,281 274.717 301,457 Healthcare 1.838.770 1.792,979 1.079.492 2,083,565 1.985,125 2.078,864 Unemployment 12.871 8.832 14,238 ' Total 8o|a,ies8 Benefits 12.094.210 13.079.937 13.345.834 14,175.891 14.339,677 14'726.383 Supplies 230.759 273.755 285.879 184.250 230.750 230.750 Small tools 829 41,127 15.423 15.600 45.600 15.600 Total Supplies 337.388 314,883 301.302 199.850 276,350 246.350 Professional services 63'438 52.781 70.090 70.000 86.500 86.500 Communication 105.106 116.565 118.685 121.000 121.000 121.000 Trovn| 52.985 47.434 54.865 41.880 41,880 41.880 Advertising 811 453 7.520 1.500 2.500 2.500 Operating leases 073.982 785,836 891.036 072.046 1.110.488 916871 Insurance 240.000 230`228 254,359 253.245 278.499 292.424 Utilities 2`513 3\499 4,177 4,400 4.400 Repair and maintenance 153.985 65.910 108,969 246.822 148.404 143.404 Miscellaneous 71'454 83.057 89.485 79.041 65.141 65.141 Total Services 1.564.228 1,385^768 1.607.186 1.886.234 1.862.812 1.674.120 Intergovernmental 2.453,692 2.890.518 2772.491 2'837.074 2.948.775 8.039`054 Capital 706.179 (D) ~ 30.000 Total Other 3.159.871 2.690.518 2.772.491 2.937.074 2,948.775 3,069.054 Total Police $ 17.855.697 $ 17.481.0e5 $ 18.026.812 $ 18.999.049 $ 10,*37.814 $ 19.715.816 71 72 DEPARTMENT: Police (10 FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description DIVISION: Administration FUND NUMBER: QOO POSITION: Chief of Police The management functions of the Police Department are included in this program. Those functions include fieca|, personnel, planning, research/development, inter- and inh3-dep8rtnneOt operations and intergovernmental coordination. Expenditure Summary Police - Administration Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change 201* 2017 pn4oueu 2018 2018 unno znzn 2018-19 2019-20 Salaries aWages $ 90*,689 % 1.114.838 $ 1.055.532 $ 951,512 * 1.347.497 V 1.394.590 *1,62m a.*o% Personnel Benefits 250.801 ano.s+r 331.569 308.096 *45.783 463,662 wsom *o1'% aunnoea 21.695 31.137 50.16e 24.000 21.000 u+.ouu 0,00% n00% aermoeo 4*2.433 565`165 681,313 664.185 666,665 656,692 0.37m '1s0m |nmmvw.Services uTaxes 19.814 1*.732 6,286 15,900 6,900 6,900 'e.unm 0.00% Capital Outlays 706.179 (o) ' ' 30,000 ' o.nnm Expenditure Total $ 2,3*4.811 m o'oos.mn $ 2.12*,866 $ 1.963.693 $ 2,490.846 * z'oro.o** 26.84m 3.41m Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits 88|G[ieS are based On @ctU8| costs for existing pO3hUVOS and include a COSt of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Administration Position 2018 PTs 2019 FTs 2019euuooted Ga|uheo Benefits u000 rTs oVoOaudSoted Salaries Benefits Police Chief 1 1 $ 165,260 $ 48.355 1 $ 168.696 $ 50.150 Deputy Police Chief 1 1 155,391 31,234 1 158.544 32.196 Police Commander 4 4 567.571 184.374 4 598.550 208.141 Police Information Officer/Recruiter O 1 94,432 37.338 1 97.260 58.116 Public Safety Budget Analyst 0 1 98.690 38.749 1 100.515 40.116 Crime Analyst 0' 1 84,844 34.845 1 88.448 36.069 Community Oriented Policing Coordinator O 1 90.415 27,200 1 92.136 28,014 Assistant lothe Chief nfPolice 1 1 77.970 32.407 1 79.512 33.574 Overtime - Regular 12,323 1.201 12.923 1.281 73 Expenditure Detail - Supplies, Services and Other Supplies includes miscellaneous office; services include travel and training, equipment rental and repair Police - Administration Account Number Actua| Budget zoio 2017 pnojnmau 2018 2018 2019 u000 000.10.521 1nn.ntun Supplies Omno $ 21.423 $ 24,987 $ 50.166 $ 24,000 $ 24.000 $ 24.000 000`110.521.100.35/00 ouppnox-Smannm|a zrr 6,151 Total Supplies 21,695 31.137 50,166 24000 24,000 24,000 000.10.521.100.*1.00 Prof a»cs-mring/px+Emp|nymemand 10,900 21.770 25/081 15.000 45J00 45,000 Confidential Counseling 000.10.5e1'100Az,oO Communication Department cell Pho»» data and other cummu�oaonnvo�c,a n�ma^ 87,948 118,685 121.000 121,000 121.000 000,10.521.100.43.00 Aumintra\,e|and all Pre -Employment 5.471 5,866 n.*Go 10,000 10.000 10.000 Hiring Travel 0oo1�z�11on��ooAu=,ni�ng ��n�nmou|"mn��inn ` ' � Sharing 798 7,520 1,100 2,500 2,500 000.10.52.1nO.4n,00 Rental Rentals and lease fees 25,827 19702 23,387 25.000 25.600 25,600 000.10.521.100,45,e4 Rental 'Equipment Replacement Fund 13.5*8 3,363 3,363 3,363 26.900 3.363 000,10.521.100.45.95 Rental Equipment Rental aM 16.167 25.424 ao,*oo on`*ns *n.uso 48.905 000.10.521100.*6.01 mnvranoo Insurance allocation mvvQ* 2*0,000 230.223 254.359 253.245 278,499 292.424 000.10.521.100.48-00 R&M Radio repairs and maintenance 3.888 4.835 1,921 6,518 5,000 5,000 000.10,521.100.48o1 R&M Repairs and maintenance for oun 82.373 48.*16 62.132 ' 80.000 - . MHz system assessment 000.10,521,500.45.00 Lease for Evidence Facility, wRo.Gym 110.099 130,603 110.000 e3.000 93.000 000.10.521,500.47.I1 uUAnem Electricity ' gso 033 2,000 2,000 000.10�521.500.*7.22 uuouev suo 267 1.000 1^000 000,10.521.500.*7-25 Utilities yvan,' 255 1.000 1.000 000.10.521�00A7.26 Utilities . Surface Water 126 40 400 00010x527.500.49.00 Miscellaneous 1'106 - 00010.521,100.49o0Miso Memberships and subscriptions *.925 5.448 10,063 5,500 5,50 5,500 Total Services 442,433 565,165 681.313 6**.185 666.65 656,692 ono 1ooz1 1oo�o��nn |nt*�^vtpm(S»n» KC RAIN, m/nu»«« � � � User Fees 19'814 14.732 6,286 15.900 6,900 o`nnn Total Intergovernmental 19.814 14,732 6,286 15.e00 6,900 6,900 oou`1o,594.1Vn.w*onCapital - Machinery and equipment 6.619 - 000.10.5e4,210.64.00 Capital - Machinery and equipment 699,559 (0) 000.10.594.220.64.00 Capital Machinery and equipment 30.000 Total Other 706.179 (0) ' ' ' 30,000 74 DEPARTMENT: Police M0 FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description DIVISION: Patrol FUND NUMBER: OOO POSITION: Chief of Police Patrol division officers respond first to all emergency and non -emergency police ca|ka, they investigate misdemeanor and felony crimes, gather evidence and make arrests, mediate disputes, assist motorists, identify and correct hazardous conditions, keep the peace in our community, maintain G patrol presence to prevent crime, identify and resolve community crime problems, and educate the public on the law and crime prevention rne@sunaa' Operations division also includes K-S teams and Police Explorers. Expenditure Summary Police - Patrol _ Expenditures Actual Budget Percent cxonga 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 ums uoun 2018-19 2019-20 Salaries mWages $ 4,073.329 $ 4.248,802 $ *.333.212 m 4,424.520 $ *.163,396 $ 4.308.724 -5,90m 3.49% Personnel Benefits 1.555.176 1.507.938 1.602,380 1s11,864 1,555.682 1.537.367 '3,49m '1.18% Supplies 105,638 1+2,20e 123,641 60,050 146.550 116.550 1**o5% '20A7% Services 688,331 *97,983 540.127 587,517 630.354 5*4,064 7.29w '?ooem mtergnvt.seruumaTaxes 1.418.872 1,578.855 1.635`071 1.752.257 1`751.355 1.806,3e6 *oS% 3.14% Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits Salaries are based on actual costs for existing positions and include m cost of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Patrol '- - Position 2018 FTE 2019 rTE 2019oudgemd Salaries Benefits 2020 PTs 2020muggeted So|ahpn Benefits Police Sergeant 4 4 $ 444.441 $ 285.147 4 $ 455.385 m 207.666 Police Officer 34 32 2.992.602 1^079.613 32 3,096,549 1,132'824 Administrative Assistant 1 1 59.111 20.798 1 63.630 22.181 Retiree Medical 106,000 - 100.000 Kelly/Mn|idayPay 234,063 23.196 258.915 25.758 Overtime 'Contractual 127.995 12.684 127.995 12.684 Overtime Regular 305.184 30.244 305.184 30.244 75 Expenditure Detail - Supplies, Services and Other Supplies includes office supplies and supplies for Explorer Post and K-9unit; services include equipment narta| and repair charges, oe|| phone, and memberships, among others; intergovernmental includes SCORE jail and animal control costs. Police - Patrol - Account Number xova| ouanvt 2016 2017 Projected cmx eum 2019 eoxo VnU 10.521.22o.31,nn Supplies office &oporaonn $ 33.185 $ 1.511 $ ' $ $ $ 000,10.521.220,31o1 Supplies Includes Department Quartermaster 55.967 94. 101.915 40.950 110.e50 110,950 ooV1o.no1.2zn.31zmSupplies -K-9Unit 3,722 3,8e0 3,916 3,500 5.000 5,000 000,10.521.220.31.038uppnea Explorer Post oo ' - - 000.10.521.220,31.04 Supplies Emergency Services Unit 10.134 10.42* 9,262 10.000 000.10.521.220.31.05 Supplies Civ|Disturbance Unit 2.174 6.e40 1.9*8 5,000 000.10.521.220.35.00 Small Tools ' 358 24.848 600 600 30,600 oOn Total Supplies 105,638 142\208 123,641 e0,050 1*6.550 116,550 00010.521.220.41o0 pm,SVns K-*"et bills and professional grooming 4,970 3.062 5,121 8,000 6,000 6,000 000.10.521.220.*2.00commummmian 51.885 5,471 000.10.521.220.43.00 Travel ' Mileage, parking 349 170 847 mm mm mm 000.10,521.220.45-00nema| Operating leases and rentals 88.390 3.400 000.10.521.220,45.9* Rental -Equipment Replacement Fund 107,940 :6.50 56.531 56,531 166.878 56,531 000.10.521.220.*5�95 nemo| Equipment Rental oaM 354.232 411.003 427.982 427.982 *32.472 456.529 000.10.521.220A8`00 R&M ' Minor Repairs mequipment and uniforms, Software License Renewals 39.2*0 1'736 19.818 no.^n^ 6.904 u.on^ 000,10.521.220.43.00 Mioc'Memberships and registrations 2.778 398 3,480 2,000 500 noo 000.10.521.220.49.03 Miuc BSA Charter, Explorer Academy 670 955 2,100 2.100 2.100 2.100 Reg. and annual recruitment open house 000.10.521.220.4e.44 M|oc-Regiatnat|onx 2.805 000.10.523.220.41o0 Profavna-wmnimring of Prisoners 35.073 1*.657 24,247 25,000 15,000 15.000 Total Services e88,331 497.983 540.127 587,517 630,35 5*4.06* oou.1o.nz1uno.o1.00mtergvmProf Svcs SCORE 1.310.736 1.*66.963 1.579.506 1.033.*05 1.626.355 1.675.146 00010,55*,300.51�00 mtemmxProf Sea -Animal Control 108.136 111.892 sn.so* 114852 125,000 131.250 Total Intergovernmental 1,*18,872 1,578'855 1.635.071 1J52.257 1.751.355 1'806.396 76 DEPARTMENT: Police (1O) FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton DIVISION: Support Operations FUND NUMBER: OOO POSITION: Chief oyPolice Description Support Operations (formerly Special Services) process all department criminal and incident reports while complying with laws regarding privacy and security. Respond tDpublic disclosure requests and serve on department receptionists. Maintain and store all C[inliOa| history records information. Expenditure Summary Police - Support Operations - - - Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change 2016 2017 Projected cViV 2018 2019 uouV 2018-19 2019-20 ox|ariemaWmge» $ 755.473 $ 760.884 $ 754,541 $ 910,907 m 910.952 $ 942.41e 0.01% 1*5% Personnel Benefits 299.684 2e6.615 307,205 355,537 375,*92 ooz.or* 5a1% 4.47.w Supplies 32,466 25,595 *1,963 +4.400 27.*00 27.*00 -38.2em 0.00% serwm,n 31.378 2e.122 30,098 83,000 76,000 76.000 '8.43% 0.00% Expenditure Total $ 1.119.000 $ 1.112.197 $ 1.133.808 $ 1.393,8** $ 1.389.854 m 1.*38.085 'n.xom o.*rm Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits Salaries are booed On actual costs for existing poohUVnS and include o cost of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Support Operations - Position 018 IFTs 2019 rTs 2019BudSeoed Salaries Benefits %ouO FTs e0208ud8e1od Salaries Benefits Support Operations Senior Manager 1 1 $ 111.315 $ 48.247 1 $ 118.902 $ 51.117 Police Records Supervisor 1 1 80,640 34,138 1 82,606 35,440 Police Information Analyst 1 O . ' u ' Police Records Specialist 7 7 490,821 209.175 7 507.519 218'459 E\AdenoeTeohnician 1 1 73.171 27.634 1 74`568 28.572 Administrative Assistant 1 1 55.735 33.592 1 58.856 34.949 Records DipaniUonSpeoim|iot O 1 45.080 17^195 1 40.301 18.220 77 Expenditure Detail - Supplies, Services and Other Supplies h7o|udee nniSCel|8neOuo office and evidence supplies; services include records destruction, repair costs, and ACCESS terminal rental, among others. Account Number Actual Budget 2016 2017 pn4onten xmo cmV 2019 uocn 000.10.521.230.31o0 Supplies Office &Operating $ 22.139 $ 13,294 $ 23,483 $ 25,000 $ 10,000 $ 10.000 000.10.521.230.31o1 'aupnoem-Emuenco 10.327 2,174 3.658 4.*00 2.400 2,400 000.10.521,230,35z0 Supplies smuence 10.128 14.823 15.000 15,000 15,000 Total Supplies 32.466 25,595 41,963 *4.400 27,*00 ur.*oo 000.10.521230.41.00 Prof Svcs Records destruction, auoonce o.uo^ onn 8,698 9,000 1.500 1.500 disposition, and translators ' 000.10,521.230.*2.00 Communication Communications services and equipment *.uso 6,109 000.10»21.230.e.01 Communication s\AdanorTech 200 000.1n�521.230.43o0 nam,| 1.*6e 1.197 0001U�521.230.15.00 Rental ''ACCESS terminal, Cole directory and copy machine lease 6,491 3.167 000.10.521,230.48.00 R&M ' Software Licenses: Spillman, ao«QA, and F|leoml.etc. 1e`047 e.257 16.238 71.500 71,500 71.500 000A0.521`230.49o0 Mion Misc. costs for maintaining records ande\Auence ouo 8,796 5'1e3 2,500 3,000 3,000 Total Services '31.378 29.1e2 xo'oyx 83,000 76,000 76.000 Total Supplies, Services and omp, $ 63,844 $ 54'717 $ 7e.061 $ 1.27.400 $ 103,400 * 103.400 78 DEPARTMENT: Po|imsMO\ FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description DIVISION: Investigations FUND NUMBER: OOO POSITION: Chief of Police Conduct all follow-up investigation associated with major crimes to include oirnes against persons, Expenditure Summary Police - Investigations Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change 201* 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 auoo 201849 2019-20 Salaries &Wages $ 1.61/,462 m 1.533,984 $ 1.5+1,662 $ 1.519.572 $ 1.601.887 $ 1,635,932 5A2m 2.13m Personnel Benefits 499.153 478,037 *52713 537,125 510.195 531.291 '5�01m *.13% Supplies 7.091 29.813 11.855 12.000 6,000 6,000 '50.00% uoom Services 157.801 107.769 13*790 133.822 165.027 105.717 23.32% '35.94% Expenditure Total $ 2'281.507 $ 2,1*9.103 $ 2'141.019 $ 2.202,519 $ 2.e83.109 * c.cro.o*n 3.86m '0.18m Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits 8a|8heS are based on aCtU@| costs for existing positions and include o Coat of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Investigations Position 2018 pTE 2019 rTs 2019sudoomd Salaries Beneft, 2020 FTE oVuVBudaoted Sa|aries oonoOm Police Sergeant 2 2 $ 234.731 $ 02.040 2 $ 239.040 $ 04,485 Police Officer 10 10 884,408 338.281 10 1.009.092 855.060 Domestic Violence Advocate 1 1 78.221 33.505 1 80.136 34.791' Police Records Specialist 1 1 64.803 21.896 1 66.048 22.606 Auto Theft Task Force Detective 0 1 99.724 40.679 1 101616 42467 Overtime Regular 140.000 13.874 140.000 13.874 79 Expenditure Detail - Supplies, Services and Other Supplies includes miscellaneous office and operating supplies; services include polygraph translation, travel, equipment rental and repair, and investigation costs, among others. Police- Invest• igations Account Number Actual Budget 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 2020 000.10.521.210.31.00 Supplies -Office and Operating $ 7,091 $ 29,313 $ 11,855 $ 12,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 Total Supplies 7,091 29,313 11,855 12,000 6,000 6,000 000.10.521.210.41.00 Prof Svcs - Polygraph, 3,404 11,957 5,943 4,000 15,000 15,000 Translation/Transcription, Department Impounds 000.10.521.210.42.00 Communication 474 7,227 - - - 000.10.521.210.43.00 Travel - Investigative Travel 6,351 6,246 6,345 5,000 5,000 5,000 000.10.521.210.45.00 Rental - Vehicle rentals and leases 2,334 (2,066) - - - - 000.10.521.210.45.94 Rental -Equipment Replacement Fund 63,462 7,595 7,595 7,595 66,351 7,595 000.10.521.210.45.95 Rental - Equipment Rental 0 & M 65,700 74,365 104,727 104,727 75,676 75,122 000.10.521,210.47.00 Public Utility - - 2,896 - - - 000.10.521.210.47.22 Public Utility - Gas 536 669 - - - - 000.10.521.210.47:25 Public Utility - Water 859 669 - - - - 000.10.521.210.48.00 Minor Repairs to Equipment 13,780 330 4,500 9,000 1,000 1,000 000.10.521.210.49.00 Misc -Unanticipated misc. investigation and DV expenses 901 777 2,784 3,500 2,000 2,000 Total Services 157,801 107,769 134,790 133,822 165,027 105,717 Total Supplies, Services and Other $ 164,892 $ 137,082 $ 146,644 $ 145,822 $ 171,027 $ 111,717 80 DEPARTMENT: Police (10) FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description DIVISION: Tukwila Anti -Crime FUND NUMBER: 000 POSITION: Chief of Police This unit, internally referred to as Tukwila Anti -Crime Team (TAC Team), provides specific criminal emphasis operations, which include narcotics, gambling, and vice -related activities. Also included are all gambling licensee audits and adult entertainment license background checks. Expenditure Summary Police - Tukwila Anti -Creme Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 2020 2018-19 2019-20 Salaries & Wages $ 408,488 $ 563,769 $ 548,142 $ 563,576 $ 719,269 $ 731,133 27.63% 1.65% Personnel Benefits 140,505 182,600 186,613 204,770 244,899 255,086 19.60% 4.16% Supplies 2,180 4,886 2,814 2,000 2,500 2,500 25.00% 0.00% Services 90,980 61,550 100,041 98,679 97,929 86,689 -0.76% -11.48% Expenditure Total 642,153 $ 812,805 $ 837,611 $ 869,025 $ 1,064,597 $ 1,075,408 22.50% 1.02% Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits Salaries are based on actual costs for existing positions and include a cost of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Tukwila Anti -Crime Position 2018 FTE 2019 FTE 2019 Budgeted Salaries Benefits 2020 FTE 2020 Budgeted Salaries Benefits Police Sergeant Police Officer 1 4 1 4 $ 117,040 $ 34,249 414,428 161,242 1 4 119,280 $ 35,647 422,160 168,244 81 Expenditure Detail — Supplies, Services and Other Supplies includes miscellaneous office supplies; services include equipment rental and repair. and license inspections, among others. Police - Tukwila Anti -Crime -- - - — Account wum»o, Actual aouyet xom xon Projected 2018 umn 2019 eoxo 000.10.521.250.31o0 Supplies Office aOperating $ 2^180 $ 4.880 $ 2,814 2,000 $ 2.500 $ 2,500 Total Supplies 2,180 4,886 2,814 2,000 2,500 2,500 u00'10.521`250.42.00 Communication Cellular phone services 3,268 3,887 000.10.521.250.43.00nrave| Mileage, parking, etc. 68 124 000.10.521.250.45.00 Rental vomue rentals and leases 20.272 19'205 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 000.10.521,250.45.94 Rental -Equipment Replacement Fund 21.820 2,675 2,675 2,675 13.580 2,675 000.10.521250.45.e5 Rental Equipment Rental O& M 32,887 30,325 no,nn* 56,004 44,3*9 44.01* 000.10.521250.48.00 Rom Equipment Maintenance , oo 1.000 1.000 1.000 000.10.521,250,*9.00 Miso Misc. expenses toinclude drug expeneeo. |icenoeinnpecnonx 12'865 5.245 12.313 10.000 10.000 10.000 Total Services 90,980 61.550 100.041 98,679 97,929 86,689 Total Supplies, Services and Other $ 93.159 $ oo.^xo $ 10e.856 y 100,679 $ 180.*29 $ 89.189 82 DEPARTMENT: Police (10) FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description DIVISION: Professional Standards FUND NUMBER: 000 POSITION: Chief of Police This section provides on -going commercial and residential security surveys, training and information programs, and maintains community crime analysis for business and residential communities. Also, maintains an on -going D.A.R.E. program within elementary, middle, and high school levels. Expenditure Summary Police - Professional Standards Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 2020 2018-19 2019-20 Salaries &Wages $ 1,263,547 $ 1,051,783 $ 1,178,102 $ 1,469,488 $ 129,464 $ 131,708 -91.19% 1.73% Personnel Benefits 428,460 367,320 424,090 578,363 44,178 46,013 -92.36% 4.15% Supplies 20,221 27,450 8,778 8,300 10,300 10,300 24.10% 0.00% Services 42,439 19,280 9,605 10,388 80,127 75,653 671.34% -5.58% Expenditure Total $ 1,754,667 $ 1,465,834 $ 1,620,576 $ 2,066,539 $ 264,069 $ 263,674 -87.22% -0.15% Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits Salaries are based on actual costs for existing positions and include a cost of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Professional Standards Position 2018 FTE 2019 FTE 2019 Budgeted Salaries Benefits 2020 FTE 2020 Budgeted Salaries Benefits Police Sergeant Community Oriented Policing Coordinator Police Officer 3 1 11 1 0 0 116,148 $ 42,858 - - - - 1 0 0 $ 118,392 $ 44,693 - - - - 83 Expenditure Details - Supplies, Services and Other Supplies include office supplies and supplies for D.A.R.E program; services include rental of equipment, equipment repair charges, among others. Police - Professional Standards Account Number Actual Budget 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 2020 000.10.521.300.31.00 Supplies - Office & Operating $ 15,507 $ 23,761 $ 5,231 $ 4,300 $ 6,300 $ 6,300 000.10.521.300.31.01 Supplies - Dare 4,714 3,690 3,548 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total Supplies 20,221 27,450 8,778 8,300 10,300 10,300 000.10.521.300.42.00 Communication 6,457 4,698 - - - - 000.10.521.300.43.00 Travel - Mileage, parking 5,451 (15) - - - - 000.10.521.300.43.01 Tra‘RI - Dare Donations - - 222 - - - 000.10.521.300.44.00 Advertising 13 453 - 400 - - 000.10.521.300.45.00 Equipment Rentals 1,209 - - - - - 000.10.521.300.45.94 Rental - Equipment Replacement Fund 11,561 1,365 1,365 1,365 5,672 1,365 000.10.521.300.45.95 Rental - Equipment Rental 0 & M 14,052 11,413 3,023 3,023 22,855 22,688 000.10.521.300.47.21 Public Utility - Electricity 889 832 - - - - 000.10.521.300.47.25 Public Utility - Water - 119 - - 000.10.521.300.47.26 Public Utility - Surface water chgs 233 245 - - - - 000.10.521.300.48.00 R&M - Maintenance Fees, including Axon 547 42 - 1,000 51,000 51,000 000.10.521.300.49,00 Misc Fees & Expenditures 2,028 130 4,995 4,600 600 600 Total Services 42,439 19,280 9,605 10,388 80,127 75,653 Total Supplies, Services and Other $ 62,661 $ 46,730 $ 18,384 $ 18,688 $ 90,427 $ 85,953 84 DEPARTMENT: Police (10) FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description DIVISION: Training FUND NUMBER: 000 POSITION: Chief of Police Planning, evaluation, scheduling, and documentation of all training programs within the department. Expenditure Summary PoliceTraining Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 2020 2018-19 2019-20 Salaries & Wages 121,043 $ 111,248 $ 121,456 117,693 $ 118,442 $ 120,392 0.64% 1.65% Personnel Benefits 36,677 35,098 38,638 40,459 39,165 40,789 -3.20% 4.15% Supplies 40,508 45,708 47,980 44,500 40,000 40,000 -10.11`)/0 0.00% Services 82,113 94,535 97,850 88,621 75,621 75,621 -14.67% 0.00% Expenditure Total $ 280,342 $ 286,589 $ 305,923 $ 291,273 $ 273,227 $ 276,802 -6.20% 1.31% Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits Salaries are based on actual costs for existing positions and include a cost of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Training 2018 2019 2019 Budgeted 2020 2020 Budgeted Position FTE FTE Salaries Benefits FTE Salaries Benefits 85 Expenditure Detail - Supplies and Services Supplies includes miscellaneous office supplies; services include instructor fees, travel for training, equipment rental and repair, memberships, and registrations, among others. Police - Trairiin Account Number Actual Budget 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 2020 000.10.521.400.31.00 Supplies - Office & Operating 40,508 45,708 47,980 44,500 40,000 40,000 Total Supplies 40,508 45,708 47,980 44,500 40,000 40,000 000.10.521 400.41.00 Prof Svcs - Outside Trainers 2,857 $ 140 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 000.10.521.400.42.00 Communication 000.10.521.400.43.00 Travel - Department Training Tra‘RI 33,825 1,225 33,847 - 37,990 - 26,380 - 26,380 - 26,380 000.10.521.400.45.00 Rentals - Includes Range Fees, SIR, etc. 1,150 1,479 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 000.10.521.400.48.00 R&M - Repairs to Training Equipment 306 - 1,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 000.10.521.400.49.00 Misc - Registrations for department training 43,976 57,844 48,060 48,941 40,941 40,941 Total Services 82,113 94,535 97,850 88,621 75,621 75,621 Total Supplies, Services and Other $ 122,622 $ 140,243 $ 145,829 $ 133,121 $ 115,621 $ 115,621 86 DEPARTMENT: Police (1[) FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Bruce Linton Description DIVISION: Traffic FUND NUMBER: OOO POSITION: Chief of Police Provides traffic |8vv enforcement and traffic ooOtnJi Investigates traffic related incidents and develops and works from a comprehensive traffic plan, which includes traffic safety education, enforcement programs such as O.U.| enforcement, and coordination with City Engineering. Also, management Qfthe Traffic Volunteer Program. Expenditure Summary Police - Traffic Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change 2016 2017 Projected umo 2018 201e unuo 2018-19 2019a0 Salaries uWages $ *07.843 $ 373,392 $ 046,326 $ 131.728 $ 620.807 $ 635.684 43.80% 2.40m Personnel Benefits 132.680 122.992 123,653 150,6e1 232,388 243.012 54.23%' +o7% Supplies 7,588 8.584 1*,105 4,600 4,600 4,600 0.00% V`nn& su,mce» 28.753 20.354 13,361 20.022 71,0e9 sn.ae* unounm '24.48m mmmnw.Services uTaxes 1.015.006 1.086.931 1.131.134 1.168,917 1.177,353 1.212,59' 0.72% 2.99% Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits Salaries are based On actual costs for existing positions and include a cost of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Traffic Position 2018 rTs zmo FTs 2019Budsoted Go|arioo Benefits 2020 rTE 2020Budgeoou Salaries Benefits Police Sergeant 1 1 $ 119.548 $ 39.674 i $ 121,752 $ 41.331 87 Expenditure Detail — Supplies, Services and Other Supplies includes nlisCe||8OeguS office Suoo|ieS services include equipment rental and repair, anl0Og others. Police - Traffic Account Number Actual Budget e016 e017 pnojomru 2018 2018 com 2020 000.10.521.700.31.00 Supplies . Office uOperating u 7.588 $ 8,584 $ 14.105 4,600 o 4,600 u 4.600 Total Supplies 7,588 u.00^ 14,105 4,600 4,600 4.600 000.10.521,700.42o0 Communication 000.10.521.700.*5.00 nonm|x 000.10.521.700.45�94 Rental -Equipment Replacement Fund 000.10,521.700.*5.95 Rental Equipment Rental o& M 000.10� ' nu� Tno.4e.no R&M Rauxr/uoAnRepair m Certification 000.10.521.700.4e.00 Miso Fnea& Expenditures ao 2,054 19.27* 5,562 1.804 ow 676 989 15.037 1.294 2.357 889 8.533 3.311 528 Van 8.533 10.000 onn 18,906 *7,183 4`500 oon 989 *r.Ooo 4.500 soo Total Services 28,753 en.xs^ 13.361 20,022 71,089 ox.00* 0uo.1o.oc1.z4o.n1MmtergomProf s"ca Dispatching and Data 1.015.006 1.0e6.931 1.131.13* 1.168.917 1.177.353 1.212.691 Total Intergovernmental 1,015,00e 1,096,931 1.131,13* 1.168'917 1.177.353 1.212.591 88 DEPARTMENT: Police (10 FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: DIVISION: Special Operations FUND N0MBER:0OO POSITION: Chief of Police Description The Special Operations Division houses the Police Department's more specialized and proactive teenna and equipment. Examples include the Community Policing Team, SWAT/Civil Disturbance/Hostage Negotiator equipment and vehicles, School Resource Officer, and Court/Jail Transport Officers. Expenditure Summary Police - Special Operations Expenditures Actual Budget Percent Change pn4emad 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 oozn 2018'19 2019-20 Salaries mWages Personnel Benefits Supplies |ntergom.Services uTom,a $ o $ $ $ 924.826 355,343 15,000 13`167 o 945,147 371J79 15.000 13.167 2.20% 4.46% oonm 0.00% Expenditure Detail - Salaries and Benefits 8a|ohee are based On actual costs for existing positions and include o cost of living adjustment per contract agreements. Police - Special Operations Position 2018 FTE 2019 FTE 209Bvdgeted Salaries Benefits 2020 FTE 2020Budgeted Ga|ahno Benefits Police Sergeant Police Officer O O 1 8 $ 117.274 $ 48.008 807,552 312,335 1 D $ 120.000 $ 44,906 825.147 326.272 89 Expenditure Detail — Supplies, Services and Other Supplies include specialized gear specific to the tegnno included within this division. Operating Rentals and Leases includes vehicles such as SWAT/Hostage Negotiator VehiC|eS, P[) CprnnO@nd Vehicles, Transport Vehicles, as well as vehicles assigned to individual members of these teams. Account Number xvmo/ ouuoot eom con Projected 2018 xmn 2019 uouo 000.10,521,260.31.0* Supplies Emergency Services unit 000.10.521.260.31`05 Supplies Civil Disturbance Unit $ $ - o $ $ 10.000 5,000 $ 10.000 5.000 Total Supplies ' ' ' 15'000 m'000 Total Services ' ' ' ' ' 00010.521.26051.00 mterg»v Prof S\,cx-yn«»ATOperating Fees 13,167 13.167 Total Intergovernmental ' ' ' ' 13,167 13.167 90 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor 29os TO: FROM: CC: DATE: INFORMATIONAL ME ORANDU Public Safety Committee Kimberly Walden, Judge; Trish Kinlow, Court Administrator Mayor Ekberg 10/10/2018 SUBJECT: 2019-2020 Court Budget ISSUE City departments are developing their proposals for the 2019-2020 biennial budget while also incorporating methods of Priority Based Budgeting (PBB). The 2019-2020 biennial budget will include general fund department budgets allocated to programs. The City Council requested that individual departmental budgets be presented to its standing committees as they become available. BACKGROUND The primary function of the Municipal Court —under the jurisdiction of the appointed Judge —is to provide a forum by which infractions and misdemeanor/gross misdemeanor criminal offenses may be resolved. The Court handles all ordinance/statutory violations, petitions for Domestic Violence/Anti-harassment Orders, and traffic infractions occurring within the Tukwila City limits. The objective is to make our City a better place to live through responsible and impartial administration of the laws designed to protect the public, while safeguarding the rights of individual citizens. DISCUSSION Salaries and Benefits COLA increases were applied to salaries, and benefits were adjusted to account for changes in healthcare and retirement. Additionally, if the council approves the Police Department's request to move forward with traffic safety cameras, the court anticipates the need to increase two of the part-time FTE positions to full-time at the start of the program. Additional increases in FTEs will be necessary if the traffic safety camera program produces a large number of infractions. Supplies and Services The budget for office supplies was reduced nearly 25%. Services expenditures remain relatively stable. Reductions were made to expenditures for interpreters and witness and juror fees. These reductions were offset by increases for the Securitas contract and equipment rentals and leases. 91 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff is seeking Public Safety Committee feedback on the proposed department budget and direction and to forward it to the Committee of the Whole for consensus on October 22, 2018. ATTACHMENTS Draft 2019-2020 Court Biennial Budget 92 Court Municipal Court Judge (.90) Court Admin strator (1) Judicial Support Judicial Support toordinator-Lead 'Coordinato-Baliff (3) (1) Judicial Support Associate II (2.75) Judicial Support Associate I (5) Probation Officer (1) Jail Alternative Specialist (.75) Judicial Support Associate II (1) 93 94 DEPARTMENT: Court (09) FUND: General RESPONSIBLE MANAGER: Kimberly Walden Description FUND NUMBER: 000 POSITION: Judge The primary function of the Municipal Court —under the jurisdiction of the appointed Judge —is to provide a forum by which infractions and misdemeanor/gross misdemeanor criminal offenses may be resolved. The Court handles all ordinance/statutory violations, petitions for Domestic Violence/Anti-harassment Orders, and traffic infractions occurring within the Tukwila City limits. The objective is to make our City a better place to live through responsible and impartial administration of the laws designed to protect the public, while safeguarding the rights of individual citizens. 2017-2018 Accomplishments Participated and supported State court efforts to develop a statewide case management system. Strategic Goal 4 • Full implementation of OCourt and electronic document storage (Laserfiche) resulting in more efficient case flow management. Completed initial implementation and will continue to expand use. Strategic Goal 4 • Streamlined and uniformed processes and forms which assists in creating consistency with neighboring courts, resulting in increased compliance with court orders. Strategic Goal 4 • Enhanced collaboration between court, public defender, prosecutor and police for continued improved efficiencies between all parties. Strategic Goal 2 • Improved court participation in citywide community outreach efforts. Strategic Goal 2 • Implementation of OCourt for case setting and court forms, as well as Laserfiche for electronic court files. This implementation creates opportunities to reduce court expenditures and improve services. Strategic Goal 4 • Rewrote the curriculum for the Washington State Probation Academy. Strategic Goal 4 • Continue to participate in county -wide trial court coordination efforts. Strategic Goal 2 • Expanded community connections by hosting three Junior Achievement sessions as part the Courts For Kids program (C4K), school collaboration efforts, and mock trials. Strategic Goal 2 2019-2020 Outcome Goals • Continue to participate and support state court efforts to secure a statewide case management system. Strategic Goal 4. • Continued collaboration with Renton and SeaTac Municipal Courts to expand use of technology for the improvement of court services to decrease court expenditures: improve calendar setting; 95 online forms (including multiple languages); scanning; self -scheduling for traffic hearings, and a jury management system. Strategic Goal 4 • Continue working with the CLJs in King County on the Unified Payment Program (relicensing program). Strategic Goal 4 • Continue to provide input to the Executive Branch in preparation for compliance with Supreme Court Indigent Defense Standards for Criminal Offender Cases: post filing diversion programs; Improved notification to Public Defenders for assigned cases. Strategic Goal 5 • Continue to improve and expand probation services by expanding in-house MRT Classes; retool and expand jail alternative program. Strategic Goal 2 • Continue to focus on Court's succession plan to include participation in State and local training opportunities. Strategic Goal 2 • Continue to participate in county -wide trial court coordination efforts. Strategic Goal 2 • Increase joint meetings with police department, prosecutor and public defender to enhance communication, and improve court services. Strategic Goal 2 • Expand community connections to include Courts For Kids (C4K), school collaboration efforts, mock trials, and Faith Based Summit on Domestic Violence. Strategic Goal 2 2019-2020 Indicators of Success • Full implementation of ()Court and electronic document storage (Laserfiche) resulting in more efficient case flow management. • Provided input in the statewide review of legal financial obligations to change the long-term effects on the impoverished. • Increased succession planning efforts. • Full participation in the City's new performance evaluation system. • Streamlined and uniformed processes and forms which assists in creating consistency with neighboring courts, which results in increased compliance with court orders. • Enhanced collaboration between court, public defender, prosecutor and police for continued improved efficiencies between all parties. • Improved court participation in citywide community outreach efforts. 96 Performance Measures Court - Performance Measures 2014 Actual 2015 Actual 2016 Actual 2017 Actual 2018 Estimated 2019 Projection 2020 Projection Charges Filed 4,110 5,000 6,700 4,500 2,700 3,500 3,500 Infraction Proceedings 13,330 13,000 12,500 12,500 800 1,000 1,000 Criminal Proceedings 2,400 3,150 3,200 3,600 6,200 7,000 7,000 Total Revenue Collected 321,950 235,000 559,000 608,000 440,000 400,000 400,000 Budget Change Discussion Salaries & Benefits COLA increases were applied to salaries, and benefits were adjusted to account for changes in healthcare and retirement. Additionally, if the council approves the Police Department's request to move forward with traffic safety cameras, the court anticipates the need to increase two of the part-time FTE positions to full-time at the start of the program. Additional increases in FTEs will be necessary if the traffic safety camera program produces a large number of infractions. Supplies and Services Several changes were made to this category. Court security line was increased due to contractual obligations. Other line items had minor changes. 97 Department Detail: Staffing and Expenditure by Program 98 PROGRAMS FTE BUDGET YEAR-TO-YEAR' PERCENT CHANGE 2019 °la of Total Budget 2020 %of Total Budget 2019-20 Law Related Education 1,01 133,893 10.3% 136,764 10.3% 2.1% Court Administration 0.59 116,307 9.0% 118,768 9.0% 2.1% Court Hearings 0.48 98,594 7.6% 98,754 7.4% 0.2% Administrative and Logistical Support for the Judges 0.61 79615 6.1% 81,807 6.2% 2.8% Scanning 0.61 58,212 4.5% 59,581 4.5% 2.4% Customer Assistance and 0.51 Payment Processing 55,032 4.2% 56,522 4.3% 2.7% Compliance Monitoring 0.56 54,692 4.2% 56,041 4.2% 2.5% Case Preparation 0.48 49,213 3,8% 50,516 3.8% 2.6% Formal & Monitored Probation 0.30 Supervision 47,889 3.7% 49,017 3.7% 2.4% Warrants 0.36 44,089 - 3.4% 44,907 3.4% 1.9% Commissions, Associations, Boards, and Committees 0.19 33,285 2.6% 34,028 2.6% 2.2% Public Record Act/Subpoena 0.30 Responses 27,695 2.1% 28,368 2.1% 2.4% Maintenance of Court Records 0.23 27,201 2.1% 27,906 2.1% 2.6% Court Interpreter Management 0.25 26,914 2.1% 27,655 2.1% 2.8% Court Financial Operations 0.17 26,003 2.0% 26,594 2.0% 2.3% Collections/Write- Offs/Maintenance of Inactive 0.22 Cases 25,742 2.0% 26,367 2.0% 2.4% Non -Compliance Case Processing 0.18 (Probation) 24,934 1.9% 25,536 1.9% 2.4% Court Required Educational Programs 0:18 24,729 1.9% 25,331 1.9% 2.4% Customer Service 0.20 24,292 1.9% 24,835 1.9% 2.2% Adjudication - General Offenses 0.16 & Traffic 23,946 1.8% 24,236 1.8% 1.2% Account Reconciliation and 0.15 Auditing 21,503 1.7% 21,989 1.7% 2.3% Technical Support -Court Case 0.20 Management Systems 21,369 1.6% 21,902 1.7% 2.5% Judicial Administration 0.10 20,830 1.6% 20,864 1.6% 0.2% Community Work Alternative 0.16 20,051 1.5% 20,508 1.5% 2.3% LFO Recovery Programs 0.23 19,730 1.5% 20,432 1,5% 3.6% Community Service 0.15 17,737 1.4% 18,190 1.4% 2.6% Policy & Procedures, & Program 0.09 Management 17,322 1.3% 17,689 1.3% 2.1% Pre -Sentence Investigations 0.10 15,963 1.2% 16,339 1.2% 2.4% Community Education and Outreach 0.08 14,925 1.1% 15,124 1.1% 1.3% Mail Processing 0.13 13,313 1.0% 13,628 1.0% 2.4% Video Conference Facilitation 0.10 12,665 1.0% 13,022 1.0% 2.8% Collections 0.12 12,572 1.0% 12,910 1.0% 2.7% Records Retention/Appeals 0.10 Management/Mental Health 11,604 0.9% 11,881 0.9% 2.4% Bail Bonds 0.10 11,604 0.9% 11,881 0.9% 2.4% Assessment of Court 0.05 Costs/Fines/Restitution 9,258 0.7% 9,273 0.7% 0.2% Day Reporting 0.08 8,766 0.7% 8,993 0.7% 2.6% Public Defender Screening 0.08 8,766 0.7% 8,993 0.7% 2.6% Citations/Fines and Fees 0.09 8,671 0.7% 8,936 0.7% 3.1% Data Input 0.09 8,671 0.7% 8,936 0.7% 3.1% Jury Manager/Management 0.07 8,335 0.6% 8,545 0.6% 2.5% Conflict Counsel - Indigent Defendants 0.05 8,186 0.6% 8,374 0.6% 2.3% Curiiniumly Sei vile 0.04 3,288 0.3% 3,405 0.3% 3.0% Non -Compliance Case Processing (Admin) 820 0.1% 820 0.1% - PROGRAM TOTALS 9.90 1,298,227 100% 1,326,167 100% 2.2% 100 Program Descriptions Law Related Education: Attend court and job specific training; Participate in Misdemeanant Probation Association. This program is supported by both Court Administration and Probation. Court Administration: Manage all non -judicial functions of the COUFt h1dUdin{] hiriO0, termhl8tiQn, cVUd policy deVe|opnnent/iOput, case flow nnGnggenl8Ot, court fiO@OCi8|S, technology, business continuity in the event of @ crisis, etc. Responsible for vendor selection and contract negotiations for court security services. Ensure case flow management meets with the legal requirements according to the law and court rules; manage the reimbursement grant for interpreter services which includes reporting activity. coordinate countywide CODlp|i2Oce (Municipal Courts), negotiate interpreter rates. Responsible for vendor selection and 'contract negotiations forCourteecuhtvaen/iceS. Oversee the court'ovvebsite and work with the Executive .Branch on keeping th8VVebeita current; oversee the insta||adion, maintenance, operation of all audio/video equipment. Court H8a[ngec Preside over all hearings; pc, conditions of release. Arraignments, prethm|o, reodineoo, motions, mitigation/contested, jury th@|s` woir dire, civil protection D[de[S. mental health hearings, etc. Responsible for ensuring a proper record of court hearings is created. /\drniOist[8tiw8 and LOOiSUC8| Support for the JUdq8S Provide administrative support tothe bench and provide Ove[SiteOfall non -judicial functions iMthe courtroom including entering for DVP{}'8.NC[}'s, firearm orders, protection orders; assist attorneys, defendants and those in -custody; responsible for managing the Customer Assistance and Payment Processing: Provide customer service, schedule hearings, process warrants, process payments; general customer service responsibilities. CoOOp|k]nDeK0OOitodnq: Review conditions of sentence and schedule hearings. Case Preparation: Input new case filings. Formal and Monitored Probation Supervision: Provide case management and monitor compliance; review probation files tVensure compliance with case conditions. Warrants: Order warrants, oversee warrant hearings (motion to recall and expired warrants; process Judge's rulings; process warrants as ordered by the Judge and in accordance with policy and procedures. Commissions, Associations, Boards, and Committees: D&1CM/\& OMCJAcomnlitteee. troiningn. Public Record Act/Subpoena Responses: Respond to public records requests by providing information as requested within the guidelines of the |8w/ and local court policy. 101 Maintenance of Court Records: Laserfiche/retention as well as audio and docket. Court Interpreter Management: Maintain database and schedule interpreters for hearings. Court Financial Operations: Manage all financial operations of the court including daily financial accounting, monthly accounting, budget preparation/management, account reconciliation, etc. Collections/Write-Offs/Maintenance of Inactive Cases: Process collections, process 10 year write offs, expungements and process inactive cases. Non -Compliance Case Processing (Probation): File violations, attend hearings, make recommendations. Court Required Educational Programs: Provide/facilitate classes such as DV MRT. Customer Service: Assist customers in person and over the phone including accepting payments, completing paperwork, scheduling hearings, customer inquiries, etc. Adjudication - General Offenses & Traffic: Adjudicate FTA's upon payment in full; mitigation, contested hearings. Issue findings on traffic/non-traffic infractions resulting from mitigation, contested hearings. Account Reconciliation and Auditing: Reconcile bank statements and JIS accounting records. Technical Support - Court Case Management Systems: Works with the Technology and Innovation Department (Executive Branch), court system vendors and AOC to troubleshoot system issues. Makes recommendations for technology improvements. Judicial Administration: General administration costs expenditures. Community Work Alternative: Judge orders commitment, In -court services issues commitments, Jail Alternative makes sure commitment is completed. LFO Recovery Programs: Coordinate the Unified Payment Program (Relicensing Program). Community Service (Probation): Coordinate work crew, community work program, and community service program. Policy, Procedures & Program Management: Draft local policies for judicial review and approval; develop procedures for daily processes; manage the development of court programs including focus, design and implementation. Pre -Sentence Investigations: Conduct pre -sentence investigations, make sentencing recommendations. Community Education and Outreach: Educate the community and surrounding areas on the law and judicial processes through community education events including partnership with schools, churches, and civic organizations. Mail Processing: Process incoming and outgoing mail. Video Conference Facilitation: Operation of video court. Collections: Process and refer past due accounts to collections. 102 Records Retention/Appeals Management/Mental Health: Retention and destruction schedules; process and refer cases to Superior Court RAU Division; process paperwork and order mental health evaluations. Bail Bonds: Input new bail bonds and process exonerations and forfeiture. Schedule bail bond hearings and send notices Cfforfeiture tobond companies and individuals. Assessment of Court Costs/Fines/Restitution: Impose required court costs, fees, and restitution. [}ayReportinQ:Coordinate and supervise day reporting program. Public Defender Screening: Assistance at front counter, probotion, and courtroom. Citations/Fines and Fees: Receipt payments for fines and penalties. Data Input: Input and update case date in the statewide case management system (JIS). JuryW1anaqer/M8n@Q8Dl8nt:{J[der/Dlai|/t[Gck/SunnnlQns/pnep8repayment invoices. Conflict Counsel - Indiqent Defendants: Assign conflict counsel to defendants when necessary. ConnnnunityService (AdFO|n):Verify hours upon receipt oKform. Community service |Sfiled Edfront counter orcoVrtroorn.Docket entries made re: case. Non -Compliance Case Prooesainq (Admin): Adnnin reviews/case condition nevievvs, review hearings for noncompliance, docket —`updates. 103 104 Expenditure Summary Expenditures nvType 2016 Actual zmr Projected umx unm Budget umy umm Percent Change 2018-19 2019-20 Salaries uWages Personnel Benefits Supplies semces | a�oonm n��ow c= m 723.501 291.891 12,988 127,020 ^ w 757,068 312,811 16.1e7 147,107 $ 784,049 33e,279 17.e96 14477 1 $ 777.647 353,*57 14.283 15¢420 s m 797.7*1 336,527 10,728 153,22e s $ 813.5*6 3*8,662 10.726 153,22 s 2.58% -4.79% -24,896 1.86% onow 1.98% 3.61% 0.00% 0.00e ozm% Expenditure Detail -Salaries and Benefits Salaries one based on actual costs for existing positions and include e coat of living adjustment per contractual agreements. I Court - Administration Position Description 2018 FTE 2019 FTE 2019Bud0ebed Se|oh*e Benefits 2020 FTE 2020Budgeted Salaries Benefits Municipal Court Judge 0.84 0.68 $ 9E\342 $ 29.344 0.68 $ 07.864 $ 30.047 Court Administrator 0.75 0.75 99\175 36.881 0.75 101.163 38.035 AdminSupport Coordinator 1 1 71.744 27,739 1 73.483 28767 Bailiff Court 1 1 70.447 39.642 1 72.340 41.311 AdrninSupport Technician 2.75 2.75 152.289 07,088 2,75 157.066 89^566 AdminSupport Assistant 0.50 0-50 28.804 6.280 0.50 29.500 8.453 Extra Labor 1.858 184 1.858 184 Overtime 3.731 370 3.731 370 Total Administration 6.64 6.67 *526.399 $207`528 6.67 $537'024 $214`723 Court - Probation Position ` Description 2018 FTE 2019 FTE 3019Bud0etod Salaries Benefits 2020 FTE 3020Budgoted Salaries Benefits Municipal Court Judge 0.21 0.23 $ 32.781 $ 8.781 0.23 $ 32.621 $ 10.016 Court Administrator O-25 0'25 33.058 12.294 0.25 33.721 12.678 Probation Officer 1 1 98.398 44.669 1 100.464 46'363 Admin Support Technician 1 1 54.734 36,360 1 56.135 37.923 AdminSupport Specialist 0`75 0.75 49.618 25.623 0.75 50.828 26.677 Extra Labor 1,822 181 1.822 181 Overtime 930 92 930 92 Total Probation 3.21 3.23 $271'342 $139'000 3.23 $276'522 $133'923 Departmenttota| 9.85 9.90 $797.741 $386'527 9,90 *813.546 $348.662 105 Expenditure Detail - Supplies, Services and Other Supplies include miscellaneous office supplies. Services include pro tern judges, pro1em judge review, interpreters, court security, travel, D1erOberohips, train]Dg, and juror fees, among others. Court. Administration Account Number Actual . Budget 201$ mnr pn4voteu 2018 2018 2019 z000 000.08.512.5 .31.O0Supp|ies'Office $ 10.053. $ 10.625 * 15.311 $ 10.528 $ 7,028 $ 7.028 O0O.O9.512`5DO.35.O0'Supplies ' Small Tools & Minor Equipment 542 953 ' ' 508 500 Total Supplies 10.595 11.576 13.311 10.528 7,528 7.528 OUO.OS.512.5OU.41.00Professional Godvces 64 ' 000.09.512.500.41.01 Prof Svcs Pro Tern Judges 13.440 19'050 11.683 12.000 11.500 11.600 OOO.0V.51Z5OO.41.03Prof Svcs 'Interpreters 40.320 34.651 35.848 09.000 36.000 30.000 uO0.Og.G12.5n0,42.UOCommunication 'Postage, delivery service, shipping, and KC|'MetCharges 3.085 8'691 6.302 8.300 8.300 8.300 000.09.512.500,43.00Trm�e| .Meals. parking, training -St Court 3.057 7.082 4,021 3.500 3.500 3,500 Conf,Regional Trng.Team Ting/Retoaat 000�09.512.500.45-00Raoto| Operating rentals and leases 2.094 7.653 4.418 2.000 7.700 7`700 O0O.US.512.5OO.4Q,OOR&M ' Annual maintenance costs ofJ|3 521 348 4.075 2.000 1.000 1.000 System printer, in -court Fax, Misc. equip. 000.09.512.500.49.00Misc-Annual memberships, OMCJA. 5.786 13.711 10.704 8.320 0,070 8`070 DMCMA.NACM.New employee/Bailiff Lmg. regiona|tmg. Registration annual training through DMCMA.DNCJA.Line Staff Cont 000.09.513.500.49.01|Miac Printing 4.561 2.653 5.437 2.000 1.000 1.000 000.09.512.500.49.04Mioo Witness & Juror fees 4.078 2.588 4.240 8.000 2,500 2.500 000,09.512.500.49.08M|oo credit card fees 2,091 2.172 2.404 2.200 2.200 2,200 Total Services 79.899 86.399 85,200 85,320 81.770 e1.770 |ntergoemmenta| OQO.Qg.512.5OQ.5O.O8Taxes &Aosmnts'Excise tax ~ 1 5 5 5 Total Intergovernmental ~ ' 1 s s s Total Supplies, Services and Other $ 90.494 $107,H7s $ 98.511 $ 95^853 $ 89,303 * 89,303 106 Court - Probation Account Number Actual Budget 2016 2017 Projected 2018 2018 2019 2020 000.09.523.300.31.00 Supplies -Office and Operating $ 2,393 $ 4,611 $ 4,685 $ 3,755 $ 3,200 $ 3,200 Total Supplies 2,393 4,611 4,685 3,755 3,200 3,200 000.09.523.300.41.00 Prof Svcs - NW Recovery Centers 3,015 56 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 000.09.523.300.41.01 Prof Svcs - Pro Tern Judges - Review- - - 1,000 500 500 Calendar Probation Cases 000.09.523.300.41.03 Prof Svcs - Interpreters for probation appts, Public Defender screening, Jail Alt. 480 - - 1,000 500 500 Prog. 000.09.523.300.41.04 Prof Svcs -Court Security 40,609 44,147 48,749 49,200 58,680 58,680 000.09.523.300.42.00 Communication - Postage, fax, and on- line usage 1,300 2,392 2,361 2,250 1,250 1,250 000.09.523.300.43.00 Travel - Meals, parking, training for 362 2,308 1,989 4,000 3,000 3,000 Probation Dept. 000.09.523.300.45.00 Operating Rentals and Leases 150 - - - - - 000.09.523,300.48.00 R&M - Annual maintenance costs for- equipment in Probation Office - 300 300 300 000.09.523.300.49.00 Misc - Registration for conferences and regional training 290 45 300 300 300 000.09.523.300.49.01 Misc - Annual memberships 115 255 405 550 425 425 000.09.523.300.49.02 Misc - Training 800 1,550 1,030 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total Services 47,121 50,708 59,579 65,100 71,455 71,455 Total Supplies and Services $ 49,514 $ 55,319 $ 64,265 $ 68,855 $ 74,655 $ 74,655 107 108