Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning 2018-10-25 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET - VIETNAMESE MARTYRS PARISH / SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAMAllan Ekberg, Mayor Department ofCo unity Develop ent - ack Pace, Director CHAIR, NHAN NGUYEN; VICE -CHAIR, DENNIS MARTINEZ; COMMISSIONERS, MIGUEL MAESTAS, SHARON MANN, MIKE HANSEN, LOUISE STRANDER, AND HEIDI WATTERS BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AGENDA AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION OCTOBER 25, 2018 - 6:30 PM TUKWILA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE ADOPT MINUTES IV. CASE NUMBERS: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: V. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L18-0026 Design Review L18-0027 Conditional Use Permit Sean Hill of Broderick Architects for Vietnamese Martyrs Parish A 7,000 sf. addition to an existing office building to create a learning center, partial demolition of and construction of an addition to the main church building (67,500 sf.), and related improvements including restriping of the parking lot and interior remodeling. A Conditional Use Permit and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are required, along with SEPA (environmental) analysis. 6841 and 6847 S. 180th St. (Sperry Drive); APN's 3623049079, 3623049017, and 3623049087 L18-0075 City of Tukwila Work session on the State mandated periodic review of Tukwila's Shoreline Master Program 200' Shoreline Zone on each side of the Green River VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORT VII. ADJOURN Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Sou thcenterBoulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Websrte: TukwilaWA.gov 2 City of Tukwila Planning Commission BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BAR) MINUTES Date: July 26, 2018 Time: 6:30 PM Location: Council Chambers Present: Chair, Nhan Nguyen; Vice Chair, Dennis Martinez; Commissioners, Louise Strander and Mike Hansen Absent: Commissioners Sharon Mann, Miguel Maestas, and Heidi Watters Staff: Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor; Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner, and Wynetta Bivens, Planning Commission Secretary Chair Nguyen called the public hearing to order at 6:30 P< Adopt Commissioner Nguyen requested the 06/28/18 minutes be amended to change the Minutes: word `rating' to `vetting' on page three, last sentence of his comments. He also read some additional language he requested-be-addedto the minutes. Upon review of the 06/28/18 recording the language added to the minutes reflect his comments from the recording. Commissioner Hansen moved to approve the minutes as amended. Commissioner Martinez seconded the motion. Motion passed. Chair Nguyen swore CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST,, LOCATION: 11 those wishing to provide testimony and opened the public hearing. L1 8-0029 Dale Sweeney Design Review approval for development of a 44,405 sf. Tru by Hilton hotel with 92 guest rooms and related site improvements. Northwest corner of Minkler Boulevard and Andover Park West, APN 2623049075 Staff asked the Commissioners the appearance of fairness questions. There were no disclosures, and no objections to the Commissioners hearing the case. Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner, Department of Community Development gave the presentation for staff. She provided background info on the neighborhood and site; and gave a summary of the Tukwila Urban Center standards and guidelines that applied for the project. She also explained how the proposal meets the guidelines. She went over the applicant's proposed alternative diagrams and renderings for consideration, which were submitted immediately prior to the public hearing. 3 Page 2 Public Hearing Minutes July 26, 2018 As noted in the July 16, 2018 staff report the applicant did not submit information for the lighting, sidewalk grades, stamped concrete pattern, integrated benches, weather protection, waste receptacles, and mechanical equipment screening. Staff recommends approval of the project with 10 conditions as noted in the July 16, 2018 staff report. Dale Sweeney, Architect and applicant addressed questions for the Commission. Commissioner Stander inquired on the list of five outstanding informational items noted in the staff report. She asked the applicant when they would be ready to submit the items for review. The applicant responded that it would not be long. Commissioner Strander said she would like the infoi niation. There were no additional comments. The public hearing was closed. Deliberation: Commissioner Hansen said it was an exciting project, but he does not think that it's ready to be approved yet. He said the Commission does not have the information they would typically have for a project. He said his recommendation is that the applicant provide the infoiuiation they need to approve the project. He said he would not be willing to approve tonight. Commissioner Martinez said he applauds staff and the architect on their willingness to work and re -work the proposal:'He said he likes the idea of integrating new building material into the soffits, and he'd generally likes to see more exterior details. He said they are almost at the finish line, but a couple of things need to be cleaned up, =.and they could probably fly right through the next meeting. He said it really is a shame that they couldn't get it all together tonight. Chair Nguyen asked the applicant when they could submit the informational items, so the project could come back to the Planning Commission. He also requested language to add a condition requiring larger street trees to address the issue of masking and the number of mature trees that were taken out for the project. Commissioner Hansen said he didn't know if he could support a condition for larger trees. Commissioner Nguyen revised his request (action item below, bullet one). Chair Nguyen re -opened the public hearing. The project will come back to the Planning Commission after the applicant has submitted the informational items for PC review. Staff asked for direction from the Commission regarding the 10 recommended conditions of approval. Staff walked through the conditions with the Commission. The Commission was in consensus with staff's recommended conditions of approval 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 10 (see action item, bullet two regarding conditions 2, 5 and 8). 4 Page 3 Public Hearing Minutes July 26, 2018 ACTION ITEMS: • Staff will return to the Commission with more information on the size of the street trees shown at maturity and will work with the applicant's landscape architect to select larger street trees if necessary. • Staff will work with the applicant to create additional renderings illustrating recommended conditions of approval number 2, 5 and 8 and come back to the Commission with a recommendation. • Applicant shall submit the materials requested in "Infoluiational Items" listed at the end of the staff report. MOTION: Commissioner Hansen moved to continue the public hearing to August 232018, 6:30 PM. Commissioner Strander seconded the motion. Motioncarried DIRECTOR'S REPORT: • Staff gave an update of projects scheduled for the Pla • Staff said there is a tentative PC tour of the Commission's previously approved projects scheduled for August 16t1'. The Commissioners were asked to confium their attendance. ADJOURNED: Submitted by: 7:45 PM etta Bivens. tinning Commission Secretary g Commission to review. 5 6 City of Tukwila Planning Commission BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW(BAR) PLANNING COMMISSION (PC) MINUTES Date: August 23, 2018 Time: 6:30 PM Location: Council Chambers Present: Vice Chair, Dennis Martinez; Commissioners, Sharon Mann Mike Hansen and Heidi Watters Absent: Chair, Nhan Nguyen; Commissioner Louise Strander and Miguel Maestas Staff: Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director; Minnie Dhalial, Planning Supervisor; Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner, Max Baker, Assistant Planner and ynetta Bivens, Planning Commission Secretary Vice -Chair Martinez called the Board of Archittural Review public hearing to order at 6:33 PM and swore in those wishing to provide testimony. Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner, Department of Community Development asked the appearance of fairness questions. There were no disclosures, and no objections to any of the Commissioners hearing the project. Case number L18-0029 is a continuance fro CASE NUMBER: L18-09 APPLICANT: Dale Sweeney REQUEST: Design Review approval for development of a 44,405 sf. Tru by Hiltonhotel with 92 gut rooms and related site improvements. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Minkler Boulevard and Andover Park West, APN 2623049075 c hearing held July 26, 2018. Lindsay Brown gave the presentation for staff. She provided a re -cap of the proposal from the July hearing, and the directions givenby the BAR to staff and the applicant. Previously, staff recommended approval of the project with 10 conditions. The BAR directed staff to work with the applicant to create exhibits to reflect the revisions made to three of the recommended conditions. Staff also returned with more info on the proposed street trees species as requested. An overview of the revisions for the continuation were also given. Staff's revised recommendation from July 26, 2018 is approval of the project with three conditions and three informational items, as listed in the August 14, 2018 addendum to the staff report. The applicant agrees with staffs recommended conditions of approval. There were no public comments. Staff and the applicant addressed questions for the Commission. 7 Page 2 Public Hearing Minutes August 23, 2018 Dale Sweeney, Architect and the applicant addressed questions regarding maintenance of the building color materials fading, and lighting. The public hearing was closed. DELIBERATION: Commissioners Martinez and Hansen were both present at the July hearing and were in consensus that the applicant met all their obligations and addressed everything satisfactorily, as instructed. Commissioner Watters said the design looks good, and complimented the applicant on the trees proposed, but said she wanted to encourage some taller trees. Commissioner Mann said she is pleased with the development and the August proposal looks good now. She said it is pleasing to have a developer listen to recommendations and be willing to work with their design group to meet the design standards put together by the City and the Commissioners. She said her only concern was the additional fighting. Commissioners Hansen and Watters asked for some clarification on the proposed trees. MOTION: Commissioner Hansen made a motion to approve case number 18-0029 with staff's findings recommendations and three conditions, an additional condition for lighting on the south facade of the building, and three informational items, Commissioner Mann Seconded the motion. All were in favor. CASE NUMBER: 1-0022 APPLICANT: Will Ralph REQUEST: Design Review approval for development of a five -story 177 room Element By Westin hotel and related site improvements. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Andover Park E and Industry Dr., APN 0223400070 Max Baker, :Assistant Planner, Department of Community Development asked the appearance of fairness questions. There were no disclosures, and no one had any objections to any of the Commissioners hearing the project. Max Baker gave the presentation for staff. He gave an overview of the review process, provided background information on the site and project, and design review criteria. In the staff report there are a total o's.i„recommendedconditions, which the applicant has provided responses to since the packet went out. Staff requested to enter into the record Exhibit A, which addresses staff's condition number one. The applicant also submitted Exhibit B, which addresses staff's condition number two. The applicant has responded to and has agreed to meet the requirements of the six conditions of approval.Staffed noted that the TUC code allows for flexibility in the landscape parking lot design, but the intent is to provide shade, so it is cooler during the summer months. This is one of the conditions the applicant has agreed to meet through the revisions. Staff recommended approval with six conditions. There was extensive discussion on condition number three regarding removing the gate between the patio area and the sidewalk along Andover Park East. The Commission were not all in consensus regarding this condition. The majority of the Commission concluded instead of making it a condition of approval condition number three should be struck. The Commissioners decided that they would leave it up to the applicant to determine what they felt was best regarding the removal of the gate. Staff confirmed that the applicant meets the open space requirement without the patio. 8 Page 3 Public Hearing Minutes August 23, 2018 Seth Terry, Architect, for the applicant addressed questions for the Commission. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. DELIBERATION: Commissioner Mann said they have set standards and if a developer makes efforts to meet those standards, adding more requirements is excessive. She said removing the gate removes the potential for cafe seating. She encouraged open space sidewalk cafes. Commissioner Hansen asked staff some clarifying questions regarding removal of the gate and staff deferred to the applicant. The applicant said they have agreed to remove the gate. Commissioner Watters said the area would require a redesign to make the grass count as open space. MOTION: Commissioner Hansen made a motion to approve Case Number L 1 8-0022 with staffs finding and conclusions, and conditions one, two, four, five and six, based on the applicant's response in Exhibit A, which he requested become a permanent part of the record. He moved to revise condition number three to leave it up to the applicant to decide whether they remove the gate. Commissioner Mann seconded the motion. The motion passed three in favor, Commissioner Watters opposed. Commissioner Hansen asked for clarification from Commissioner Waiters. He asked whether her objection was because of the motion made on condition number three. Commissioner Watters said for the record she was supportive of the project and had no concerns but was opposed to condition number three. Commissioner Hansen moved to revise his motion to approve Case Number L18-0022 with staff's finding and conclusions, and conditions one, two, four, five and six, based on the applicant's response in Exhibit A, which he requested become a permanent part of the record. He moved to strike condition number three. Noted: Commissioner Martinez said they support the growth in the Urban Center, and they come to a unanimous decision. Commissioner Hansen thanked the applicant for bringing a great project to the Urban Center, and he thanked staff for an excellent job. Commissioner Mann thanked the staff for working diligently on both projects and for bringing forth projects they can be proud of. 9 Page 4 Public Hearing Minutes August 23, 2018 Vice -Chair Martinez called the Planning Commission public hearing to order and swore in those wishing to provide testimony. CASE NUMBER: L18-0045 Zoning Code Amendments APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Deliberation on regulations for short term residential rentals (less than 30 days) and updates to associated regulations for boarding houses, bed and breakfast lodging and residential rental unit licensing. LOCATION: Citywide.,. There were only four commissioners in attendance and they were in consensus to delay hearing the short-term rental regulations due to the low PC turnout. Due to the busy PC schedule staff does not know when this item will come back to the Commission. Commissioner Watters said she feels uncomfortable deciding without more Commissioners because it's big and impactful. She said it's important and it is very disappointing todelay it. She said there are people struggling to pay their mortgage and stay in their house, and that it does matter, and this could help. She also said she was curious to know what Council would prefer they did. Director's Report: • There was discussion on attendance. There as a request to address the issue at a meeting soon, because continued absences are becoming a problem. There was also a request for a copy of the attendance definition. • Staff provided anupdate on the PC schedule for the remainder of the year. • Commissioners Martinez, Mann, and Waiters attended the tour of previously approved projects with staff in August. They all thanked staff and noted such sentiments, it was a great opportunity; great experience; they enjoyed it; they like seeing the completed projects; appreciated staff taking the time; and it was an encouraging example of why they volunteer their time. ADJOURNED: .,:::40 P Submitted by: Wynetta Givens Planning Commission Secretary 10 City of Tukwila Planning Commission PLANNING COMMISSION (PC) MINUTES Date: September 27, 2018 Time: 6:30 PM Location: Council Chambers Present: Chair, Nhan Nguyen; Commissioners, Sharon Mann, Mike Hansen, Louise Strander and Heidi Watters Absent: Vice Chair, Dennis Martinez and Commissioner Migl,Maestas Staff: Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor; Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner; Moira Bradshaw, Senior Planner and Wynetta Bivens, Planning Commission Secretary Chair Nguyen opened the public hearing and swore in those wishing to provide testimony. CASE NUMBERS: L18-0038 Public Hearing Deign Review L18-0037 Conditional Use Permit L18-0040 Variance APPLICANT: Lisa Klein, AICP at AlBL for Tukwila School District REQUEST: A Conditional Use Per nit is needed to allow Showalter Middle School and its expansion in the LDR (low density residential) zone, Design Review to add approximately 13,000 st to the existing campus of 88,000 sf2, and a Variance for the proposed music room to exceed the 30-ft height maximum in the LDR zone by feet, and SEPTA environmental review. LOCATION: 46 8 S. 144th St; APN 1523049108 Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner, Department of Community Development gave the presentation for staff: She asked the appearance of frness questions. There were no disclosures, and no objections to any of the Commissioners hearing the project. Staff asked the applicants, Jeff Phinney and Lisa Klein to introduce themselves. Staff provided an overview of the site, existing development, and criteria for the Design Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variance request. Staff noted that the Conditional Use Permit and the Variance are normally heard by the Hearing Examiner. However, Municipal Code Title 18 allows for consolidation of the permit requests. Therefore, the Board of Architectural Review heard and made the decision for all three requests. There are changes to the site plan alternative on the north side of the campus, next to the relocated fire lane. The proposed site plan alternative will be constructed later if funding and needs allow. At staff's recommendation the applicant submitted the site plan alternative simultaneously with their application. The Municipal Code does not allow changes to the Conditional Use Permit without another public hearing. Therefore, staff said in the essence of time and money it would be nice if the Commission reviewed the site plan and the site plan alternative and consider both. Jeff Phinney, the Architect for the applicant, addressed questions for the Commission. 11 Page 2 Public Hearing Minutes September 27, 2018 REQUESTS: Conditional Use Permit A Conditional Use Peiiiiit is a process to evaluate unique or unusual landuses in a zone, which schools require in any zone. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit, including the site plan and the site plan alternative, with one condition. Variance The Variance request is for up to an eight -foot -high increase above the 30 ft. maximum height allowed in the Low -Density Residents for building B only. The height Variance request is to accommodate the tall music room for the acoustics. Staff recommends approval of the Variance request with no conditions. Design Review Design Review is required of all non-residential uses in the Low -Density Residential Zone. Non- conforming landscape areas should be brought into compliance and non -conforming parking areas may remain non-confoiiuing Staff recommends approval of the Design Review request including the conditions of approval for two modifications to the landscaping Mr. Phinney and staff addressed questions for the Conunission. Commissioner Mann said she wantedsome emphasis on landscaping. She requested the proposed irrigation plan be expanded to include the existing landscaping areas. Mr Phinney said that the existing irrigation system will operate along with the new system. There were no public comments. > . The public hearing was closed. MOTIONS: Commissioner Mann moved to approve Case Number L18-0037, Conditional Use Permit with staffs findings, conclusions and recommendations, and one condition. Commissioner Hansen seconded the motion. Motion passed. Commissioner Mann moved to approve Case Number L18-0040, Variance with staffs findings, conclusions and recommendations. Commissioner Hansen seconded the motion. Motion passed. Commissioner Mann moved to approve Case Number L18-0038, Design Review with staff's findings, conclusions and recommendations including two modification to the proposed landscaping. Commissioner Hansen seconded the motion. Motion passed. 12 Page 3 Public Hearing Minutes September 27, 2018 Chair Nguyen called the Planning Commission public hearing to order. Commissioner Strander disclosed due to the subject of the stand-alone parking lots and off-street parking, and her family owns a stand-alone parking lot in the City. She recused herself and left the courtroom at 7:45 PM. Chair Nguyen opened the Planning Commission public hearing and swore in those wishing to provide testimony. CASE NUMBER: L18-0070 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Zoning Code Amendment modifying the location requirements for off-street parking as it relates to government offices and poke stations LOCATION: City Wide Moira Bradshaw, Senior Planner, Department of Commdhtt Development gave the presentation for staff The proposal is for Zoning Code Amendments to the 1) Landuse Table that lists the various uses allowed in the City; 2) Off-street parking regulations, and to clarify the locational standards for off-street parking Staff handed out an aerial of the property acquired by the City for the Justice Center that provided some background on what generated the request and proposal. PROPOSAL: Add a new category in the Landuse Table forparking areas_that are stand-alone for municipal offices and police stations. To be pe> witted as conditional use, all zones where police stations currently are also conditional use, for a stand-alone parking lot and police station. Staff noted the following: • The anticipatedimpacts for the proposal are minimum for a very targeted code amendment. • Business parking is currently required to be located on the lot with the business. • The proposal would be supportive of the Growth Management Act. • Four questions in the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC 18.80.050(b)) will be used as the criteria to address this issue. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approvalof the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code be forwarded to the City Council. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. DELIBERATION: Commissioner Mann discussed using the parking lot for farmer's market. Commissioner Watters stated that existing structure that is not part of the site should help screen the parking lot. Commissioner Hansen asked what type of notice was provided for this code amendment. Staff clarified that the public hearing notice was published in the Seattle Times and posted on the City's website. Also, Justice Center is subject to design review and the Board of Architectural Review will be making a decision on the design of the Justice Center at a future date. Additionally, public notice for the conditional use permit and design review will include notification of the surroundii3 Page 4 Public Hearing Minutes September 27, 2018 property owners and tenants. The Planning Commissioners were in consensus on forwarding the proposed amendment as proposed by staff to the City Council for their consideration. MOTION: Commissioner Hansen made a motion to approve Case Number PL18-0060 and L18-0070 Code Amendments and forward them to the City Council for their approval. Commissioner Watters seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Director's Report: • Reminder, three Commissioners have terms expiring in Decembe and need to let staff know their interest regarding reappointment. • There will be a public hearing held on October l lth. • There will be a work session held on October 25th • Holiday schedule, meetings for November and December will be held on the second Thursday of the month. • A work session will be held on the Sensitive Area Update on November 8th • Staff inquired with the Commission regarding holding both the Justice Center and the Assistant Living facility on the December 13 agenda. The Commission said the items need to be on two separate agendas. Adjourned: 8:23 PM Submitted by: Wynetta Bivens Planning Commissio 14 Altan Ekberg, Mayor sPas gent of Cor unity Development Jack Pace, Director Staff Report Board of Architectural Review for Vietnamese Martyrs Expansion Prepared for the October 25, 2018 Meeting FILE NUMBERS: L18-0026 Design Review L18-0027 Conditional Use Permit APPLICANT: Sean Hill of Broderick Architects on behalf of Vietnamese Martyrs Parish REQUEST: The applicant proposes a 7,000 sf2 addition to an existing office building to create a learning center, partial demolition of and construction of an addition to the main church building (67,500 sf2), and related improvements including restriping and expanding the parking lot and interior remodeling. LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING 6841 and 6847 S. 180th St. Tukwila, WA Tukwila Urban Center- Workplace (TUC-WP) with portions of Public Recreation Overlay SEPA DETERMINATION: A Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) was issued on October 17th, 2018. NOTIFICATION: A Notice of Application was mailed on May 11, 2018 to property owners within 500' of the site and agencies with jurisdiction and was also posted on site. Comments were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. A Determination of Non -Significance was issued on October 17th, 2018. A Notice of Hearing was mailed on October 10, 2018 and published in the Seattle Times on October 11, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions STAFF: Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner Tukwila City Hall = 620Sou tcentr Boulevard Tukwila, 206-4 TukwilaWA gov 15 ATTACHMENTS: A. Large Plan Sheets- Site and Landscaping Plans Survey Site Plan Exhibit C Trees to be Removed Sheet A4 Proposed Site Plan Sheet A4.1 Luminaire Plan Sheet A5 Landscaping Plan Exhibit D Shoreline Public Access B. Large Plan Sheets- Floor Plans and Elevations Sheet A7 Church Ground Floor Sheet A8 Church Second Floor Sheet A6 Leaning Center Floor Plan and Elevations Sheet A9 Church- North and West Elevations Sheet A10 Church- South and East Elevations C. Hearing Examiner's decision approving the Conditional Use Permit on May 15, 2013. D. Applicant's response to Conditional Use Criteria E. Church attendance report dated 9/25/2018 prepared by Broderick Architects F. Traffic Management Plan dated 9/25/2018 prepared by Broderick Architect G. Applicant's response to Design Review Criteria H. Exterior Material information dated 10/16/2018 prepared by Broderick Architects I. Tukwila Municipal Code sections TMC Table 18-1 Summary of applicable review process and standards/guidelines; TMC Table 18-3 Tukwila Urban Center District Standards; TMC Figures 18- 25 and 18-27, Commercial Corridor and Workplace Standards J. Public Comments and Applicant's response K. Materials Board will be presented at the meeting 16 2 REPORT ORGANIZATION Following a detailed project description for the expansion of the Vietnamese Martyrs Church, the report is divided for analysis of the conditional use permit and design review requests. In both of these sections, the proposal will be compared to the criteria for permit approval. TMC 18.104.030 allows for all permit applications related to a single project to be bundled together in a consolidated hearing and approval procedure, using the highest numbered land use decision type applicable to the project application. Conditional Use Permits are Type 3 land use decisions made by the Hearing Examiner. Design Review is a Type 4 decision made by the Board of Architectural Review. The Conditional Use Permit and Design Review requests will both be decided by the Board of Architectural Review. An open record public hearing is scheduled on October 25, 2018. A SEPA Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) was issued on October 17th, 2018 the comment period for SEPA determination shall end on October 31, 2018. Per WAC 197-11-340 an agency cannot act on a proposal for 14 days after the issuance of DNS if there is another agency with jurisdiction. Since the project is subject to Shoreline Substantial Development permit, the Department of Ecology is another agency with jurisdiction. Therefore, the Board of Architectural Review could hold the hearing on October 25, 2018 but will need to keep the hearing open until the next meeting on November 8, 2018 to make a decision on the design review and conditional use permit for the project. FINDINGS Site Information The Vietnamese Martyrs church expansion is planned for three parcels at the terminus and east side of Sperry Drive, in the Tukwila Urban Center- Workplace District. The Green River Trail is routed atop a bermed levee maintained by the King County Flood Control District, forming the western, southern, and eastern edges of the development site. The Public Recreation Overlay zone covers approximately 100' of the east, west, and south edges of the site measured from the landward bottom of the levee. There is an access road used by the Flood District running from the southeast edge of the church building along the bottom of the levee to about midway along the site's eastern edge. Vehicular access to the site is from Sperry Drive; there are no other driveways onto S. 180th Street. A steep bank divides the mostly flat developable area of the site from S. 180th Street. 3 17 The area including this site and across the river west of West Valley Highway was annexed to Tukwila in 1958 under Ordinance 258. The current Shoreline Master Program, adopted in 2011, establishes a Shoreline buffer width of 125 feet for areas within the Urban Conservancy Environment protected by levees, measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The area within the Shoreline Overlay but outside of the buffer comprises an additional 75 feet from the buffer edge. Existing Development The site is developed with two older buildings, each partially surrounded by surface parking areas, and separated from each other by a grassy undeveloped area. At the northeast corner of the site sits a 17000 sf2 former Wells Fargo bank building constructed in 1968, with one row of parking between the building and S. 180th Street and two rows of parking between the east side of the building and the levee. The exit for the parking area routes parallel to the west side of the building before intersecting with Sperry Drive, a private street. 4 18 The church building of 62,250 sf2 was built in 1973. It is located near the southern edge of the developable site, with a grouping of mature evergreen trees located between the southern edge of the church and the landward edge of the levee. There is asphalt parking west, north and east of the building, and a small parking area and loading area located at the southwest corner of the building. The church area of the site forms the terminus of Sperry Drive. Surrounding Land Uses West of the Sperry Drive but east of the Green River is two parcels owned and used by Wells Fargo bank. North of the site across S. 180th Street are other commercial uses- a Taco Time restaurant, oil change business, and Home Depot. All of these sites are zoned TUC-WP, and the Wells Fargo parcel also has the Public recreation Overlay along the river trail at the western property line. South of the site and across the river is an office park zoned commercial/light industrial (CLI). East of the church and across the river is a small strip commercial center and a Residence Inn, both located in the City of Kent. Environmentally Sensitive Areas The Shoreline Overlay comprises 200' landward of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), along the site's western, southern, and eastern boundaries. There is a small strip of steep slopes at the northern edge of the site, sloping sharply up to S. 180th Street. Topography The majority of the site is flat; the edges of the site sit above the developable area, formed by levees of three sides and a steep slope on the northern site edge. Vegetation Streetscape landscaping along Sperry Drive consists of five large, healthy trees on the west side of the street and grassy lawn underneath. This landscaped area begins 120' south of S. 180th St. and runs for 140', ending at the vehicular ingress for Wells Fargo. On the east side of Sperry Drive is a landscape strip with five ornamental trees with gravel underneath the canopies, ending approximately 160' south of S. 1 80th Street at the egress for the Wells Fargo building. There are mature evergreen trees on the northeast edge of the site on a steep slope/levee berm between the parking lot edge of the office building and the river, and between the church's southern wall and the levee. Additionally, there are three large evergreens between the church and office buildings, one evergreen at the northwest corner of the church, six cherry trees in front of the church, and one small deciduous tree east of the church. Project Description The project proposes an expansion of the existing main church building, expanding and converting a former bank building into classrooms, expanding and restriping the parking lot, and 5 19 other site changes including additional landscaping and pedestrian access. These improvements are divided into three phases. The renovations and expansions planned are to accommodate the existing church congregation; an increase in the congregation and demand for classroom space, parking spaces, etc. is not anticipated with project approval. Phase I will add 7,000 sf2 to the existing 17,000 sf2 office building fronting S. 180th street, to create a Learning Center with classrooms. Phase I includes expanding the parking area south of the proposed Learning Center and east of the church, and installing perimeter parking lot landscaping, marked pedestrian paths of pervious pavement, and a small bioswale for natural filtration of stormwater runoff. Phase II consists of partial demolition of the church and an expansion; total construction area will cover approximately 67,500 sf2. Phase II will demolish about 50% of the existing building on the northern side, constructing a sanctuary, chapel, administrative offices and six classrooms over a ground -level parking garage. Phase III consists of interior renovations to the southern half of the existing church. Approximately 27,000 sf2 will be renovated, improving the kitchen and cafeteria and creating an auditorium. Behind the elevated levee which routes along the western, southern, and eastern edges of the parcels, the ground is generally flat with a steep slope up to S. 180th from the northern parking area of the proposed Learning Center. The Flood Control District requires 30' wide access easements for levee maintenance at the eastern edge of the site between existing Learning Center parking and a proposed landscaped planting area, and on the northwestern corner of the church parcel site. Additionally, an existing levee access road along the landward edge of the berm along the southern and eastern edges of the site will be paved to provide the District and the Tukwila Fire Department access for their needs. Almost half of the project site is within the 200-foot shoreline jurisdiction of the Green River, in the Urban Conservancy Shoreline Environment, protected by levees. The work occurring within the 125- foot buffer zone and within the 200 ft. Shoreline Overlay includes parking lot restriping and expansion and installation of landscaping and lighting. No lighting or glare from proposed improvements will reach the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) (Luminaire Plan, Attachment A). No work will occur waterward of the OHWM or on the levee banks or top. 6 20 EaM ttggvlaMtttr.„. Mr,L,WZ,T,r7Z StTE PLAN r;,,F7,70,F71=gr. `.; 5-! Figure 1. Proposed Site Plan Building Design AOC ,,,Ikv,vsee,„544,4q, V6640',Wthti,b0.-, WIN.41""r, - ;:A§ww,tkart441 „omit :'"Nig;4 AM, Figure 2. Rendering of the site from Sperry drive and S. 180' Street 7 21 The architectural renderings and description of the church building expansion and remodel show a French colonial design reminiscent of the architecture of Saigon, with towers topped by spires framing the main entrance and forming the narthex. The processional doors to the sanctuary are centered by a series of steps flanked by ADA-accessible ramps rising from a courtyard surfaced in brick -colored stamped concrete. Doorways are arched, but this main fagade is peaked over the second -story circular stained glass window. The church building's roof material is primarily red clay roofing tiles, with ribbed metal roofing forming the spires, color matched to the clay tiles. The exterior wall treatment is Nichiha Fiber Cement in Sandstone Desert Beige, a pale tan color. Portions of the base will have a stone veneer treatment applied approximately 4' from ground level, as will the Learning Center fagade. Figure 3. Northern elevation and church entrance Looking left of the main entrance, you see the shorter 2-story section of the building housing offices and classrooms. This portion of the building has an exterior arcade running across the length of the second story, and the eastern edge is framed by a taller arched roof over a ground -floor east -facing exterior stage. There is a secondary entrance along this section, also accessed by stairs ascending from the plaza, but the entrance is recessed and smaller than the principal entrance. Behind the northern facade but visible and prominent behind the principal entrance is a large dome with clerestory windows forming the roof directly over the sanctuary. The dome and all portions of the building taller than 45' are non -habitable, religious architectural features integral to the church design. 8 22 Figure 4. West elevation; renovated portion only The renovated northernmost section of the church building seen above in Figure 4 is designed with a single story of conditioned space (sanctuary, chapel, offices and classrooms) over a ground -floor garage with 105 parking spaces, storage space, and two vehicular entries each on the western and eastern sides of the building. The learning center will be expanded slightly to the west and south, and all facades will be renovated to match the church's warm beige coloring and clay roofing tiles. The Learning Center will have Hardie Panel Vertical Siding in Sail Cloth, a pale tan color matching the church's fa9ade. The Learning Center will have the same stone veneer treatment applied to the bottom 4' of all facades (precast stone veneer- El Dorado Autumn Leaf) and will be reroofed in red clay roofing tiles (Boral Clay Tile- El Camino Blend). The applicant has proposed Stucco as an alternate material for Hardie Panel Vertical Siding. Also, Met Tile Metal Roofing Tile in Mission Clay color is proposed as an alternate material for roofing. See Attachment H for photos of the proposed materials. Materials board shall be provided at the meeting. Site Plan The project expands the building footprints and parking areas of the site without expanding the developable area defined as the flat expanse landward of the levee berms. The existing nonconforming parking areas will remain, but the parking area will be increased by paving the flat areas of patchy grass and dirt between the Learning Center and the church and between the church's eastern facade and the levee. A stormwater treatment and detention tank will be buried underneath some of the parking spaces created by paving the area between the two buildings. 9 23 Immicso EmamEn ®®mom A31_ttri}�qv: Figure 5. Proposed site plan showing pedestrian pathways Pnv?E 'E.NC CiatREs ^*H+\°LL HAVE SPUT M E E' VJ E CES WHERE Vi IELE afVv C,PER+ E,•_E !_:RTE'.FOR Sari EENNt:, Vehicular and pedestrian circulation will be improved with project approval. The existing parking areas are devoid of landscaping islands, integrated site lighting, and pedestrian pathways. Vehicular circulation will be improved via the paving of an existing gravel pathway following the levee berm around the southern and eastern edges of the development area, marked and defined drive aisles and clear traffic patterns, and shielded, directed parking lot lighting. The expanded parking lot areas meet all landscaping and lighting requirements and feature 6' wide pedestrian paths to the buildings easily identifiable by colored pervious pavement and framed by pedestrian lighting fixtures. The section of pedestrian pathway adjacent to the Learning Center's southern wall from Sperry Drive to the trail will be accessible to the public via a recorded public access easement, marked with appropriate signage, and maintained for the life of the project by the applicant. When selecting a route that could be used for public shoreline access, several routes were considered including a stairway descending from the S. 180th St. bridge terminus at the northeast corner of the site down to the trail, and a sidewalk extension on the east side of Sperry Drive. The sidewalk extension on the west side of Sperry Drive, crossing over and continuing east in a straight line was selected because of problems identified with the other two options by the Flood Control District, Tukwila Parks Department, and Public Works staff. Additionally, it was noted that the large deciduous trees on the west side of Sperry Drive are lush and healthy while the trees on the east side are over pruned and struggling. The proposed public access route saves the healthy trees, improved pedestrian circulation to and throughout the site, and replaces unhealthy and struggling landscaping. 10 24 Landscaping When there is a change of use or expansion proposed that would increase the required parking spaces by less than 100% of existing, the new parking areas only must comply with current development standards; the existing areas may remain legally nonconforming. Outside of the Shoreline Overlay, Per TMC 18.70.080 Nonconforming Parking Lots, parking lots need only come into compliance with current code requirements (stall size, drive aisle width, interior landscaping requirements) if a change of use is proposed, or if additional parking is required to support building additions. As the proposed building expansions do not change the use of the site and no increase in parishioners is anticipated, the landscaping requirements for parking lot islands in the existing parking areas onsite do not apply. The existing levee berms maintained by the Flood Control District provide screening for the proposed expanded parking areas located between the river and buildings. No plantings or structures including fencing are allowed on the levee berms. The Flood Control District and the Tukwila Fire Department both require the applicant to pave the access road that runs along the interior edge of the levee berm, preventing plantings or fencing to reduce visual impacts. Landscape plans show significant clustering of evergreen trees with shrubs and groundcover between the proposed expanded parking areas east and northeast of the church building. 28 evergreen trees (Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedar) will be planted in the perimeter landscaping areas. The applicant has agreed to give the 5 trees that will be removed from the Shoreline Overlay to King County for use as large woody debris for riverine habitat. Throughout the new parking areas, landscaped islands are positioned no more than 150 feet apart. These landscaped areas are planted with deciduous trees, shrubs and groundcover. The plans show 4,457 sfz of new landscaping proposed with project approval. East of the church between two rows of parking, a bioretention area will accept runoff from the adjacent parking spaces, naturally filtering it through the landscaping and soil. There are small landscaped areas framing the church's northern facade adjacent to the ramps to the sanctuary, between the two entrances, and hugging the building's northeast corner. Streetscape landscaping proposed is a replanting of the 15' wide landscaping strip on the eastern side of Sperry Drive adjacent to the Learning Center with a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees, with shrubs and groundcover planted underneath. Public Comments Notice was sent to property owners and tenants within 500' of the site and agencies with jurisdiction. No comments were received from the general public regarding the proposed work. Comments were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe related to SEPA and Shoreline permit. These comments were forwarded to the applicant, who replied to each comment and 11 25 submitted revisions incorporating some of the Tribe's concerns. These comments and applicant's response are included as Attachment J. The applicant has incorporated several suggestions from the Tribe into the site, landscaping and luminaire plans. In response to concerns about artificial lighting, the applicant has submitted design specification sheets for lighting fixtures showing that light sources will be shielded to minimize light spillover and glare, and a luminaire plan showing that no light generated from the project will reach the ordinary high water mark. The Tribe requested tree species substitutions of tall conifer trees (that could provide shade over part of the river) for the mostly deciduous trees initially proposed as perimeter landscaping. The applicant has since revised the landscaping plan showing Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedar in the perimeter landscaping areas, in addition to significantly expanding the size of landscaping areas within the Shoreline Overlay. The applicant has agreed to give the 5 trees that will be removed from the Shoreline Overlay to King County for use as large woody debris for riverine habitat. 12 26 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT L18-0027 Vietnamese Martyrs Parish requests approval of a conditional use permit to allow the church to operate and expand in the TUC-WP zone. Conditional use permits are utilized as a way to establish review and permit approval procedures for unusual or unique types of land uses which due to their nature, require special consideration of their impact on the neighborhood and land uses in the vicinity. There was a conditional use permit approved by the Hearing Examiner in 2013, for establishing this church use in an existing manufacturing building at 6801 S 180th Street. Expansion of the church use requires a new conditional use permit. See Attachment C for the Hearing Examiner's decision issued in 2013. Criteria for Approval The proposed project must comply with criteria detailed in the Conditional Use Permit Chapter of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC 18.64.050). The applicant's response to the conditional use permit criteria is Attachment D to this staff report. Staff makes the following findings using the Code's conditional use permit criteria (TMC 18.64.050) listed in italics: 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. The project will improve the appearance of the church building and provide site improvements such as water quality measures and additional parking spaces needed to adequately serve the existing church congregation. The improvements planned will improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation, create additional access to the trail and shoreline, and improve the quality of development significantly while maintaining the site's use as a church serving the Catholic Vietnamese community in Tukwila and environs. 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. The Tukwila Urban Center- Workplace District (TUC-WP) is intended to provide a wide range of distribution, warehousing, light industrial, "big box" retail, and furniture outlets, with incremental infill by office and other complementary commercial uses. S. 180th Street is designated as a Commercial Corridor in the Tukwila Urban Center. Commercial corridors are designed to provide greater capacity for vehicles, and attractive streetscapes along heavily travelled roadways serving auto -oriented commercial uses, with modest improvements for pedestrian safety. Sperry Drive is a private street but designated as a Workplace Corridor. Workplace Corridor standards are designated to provide streets serving truck loading and parking access for primarily warehouse/distribution uses in the southern part of the Southcenter area, with modest improvements for pedestrian safety. 13 27 The following relevant standards exist in the TUC-WP District (TUC-WP), Commercial Corridors (S. 180th St.) and Workplace Corridors (Sperry Dr.) and are found in the identified section of the Tukwila Municipal Code: Setbacks (Table 18-3; Figures 18-25 and 18-27): Side and rear- 5 feet. Front yard setback for properties along Sperry Drive and S. 180th Street is 15 feet. Off-street parking (TMC Figure 18-7): Religious facilities are required to provide 1 parking space for each 4 fixed seats. The closest use to the educational facilities proposed as an accessory use of the site is a high school, with required parking determined as 1 space for each staff member plus 2 for every 5 students or visitors. Bicycle parking minimums are set at 1 space for every 50 required vehicular parking spaces for both religious facilities and high school uses. Landscaping (TMC Table 18-3; Figure 18-27): There are no side or rear landscaping requirements of the District. Front yards are required to have 15 feet of landscaping based on the corridor standards for Sperry Dive. The public frontage standard for both Sperry Drive and S. 180th Street is street trees planted 30-50 feet apart in a continuous landscaped strip 9 feet wide at the back of the curb. The parking lot and perimeter landscaping requirements in the Shoreline Chapter of the Tukwila Municipal Code also apply. Building height (Table 18-3): Buildings may be a maximum of 45 feet high, excluding portions of buildings extending beyond the primary building mass such as cupulas, bell towers, other architectural features, and non -habitable spaces. The building height provisions in the Shoreline Chapter of the Tukwila Municipal Code also apply. Both buildings meet the minimum setbacks of the Tukwila Urban Center Workplace District and Commercial and Workplace Corridors. The proposal will add 314 parking spaces west of the church and between the church and learning center, providing a total of 485 off-street parking spaces. Religious uses have a parking requirement of 1 space per every 4 fixed seats. There is no parking standard for the education activities to be held on the site, but the high school standard seems to be the closet equivalent use, with parking needs expected of staff and some students. The applicant has submitted an attendance report (Attachment E) showing the activities hosted by the parish, their days of the week and times, and attendance numbers. Because activities and events at the church take place on different days and times, parking demand should be calculated based on the site's uses and the time of greatest demand. The event with the largest attendance (and greatest demand for parking) is Sunday mass held at 9:30 am, with an estimated 1200 attendees. Mass is held in the church sanctuary, which will have 1,318 fixed seats, requiring 330 parking spaces. Weekday 11 am mass has the lowest attendance of 50 parishioners. There are 20 classrooms in the Learning Center and the church building, with an estimated 20 staff members requiring 30 parking spaces under the high school land use parking requirement. The parking requirements of religious facilities and high school uses are met even if educational 14 28 classes and the largest mass service are held simultaneously. Additional parking has been provided onsite and a Traffic Management Plan (Attachment F) has been submitted for consideration because the parish occasionally hosts large events such as the Summer Festival held in August, which replaces some of the parking areas with stages and temporary shade structures while larger attendance numbers increase the demand for parking. General landscaping requirements are discussed in detail in the Design Review section later in the staff report. TMC 18.44.130.E regulates nonconforming parking and landscaping areas within the Shoreline Overlay. When there is a change of use or expansion proposed that would increase the required parking spaces by less than 100% of existing, the new parking areas only must comply with current development standards; the existing areas may remain legally nonconforming. Outside of the Shoreline Overlay, Per TMC 18.70.080 Nonconforming Parking Lots, parking lots need only come into compliance with current code requirements (stall size, drive aisle width, interior landscaping requirements) if a change of use is proposed, or if additional parking is required to support building additions. As the proposed building expansions do not change the use of the site and no increase in parishioners is anticipated, the landscaping requirements for parking lot islands in the existing parking areas onsite do not apply. A portion of the church building is located in the Shoreline Overlay, outside of the buffer. The development standards for the Urban Conservancy Environment, non -buffer areas restricts building height to 45 feet. The Learning Center and the habitable portions of the expanded church building meet the 45 feet maximum height allowed in the TUC-WP zone. The dome, bell towers, and all portions of the church building taller than 45' are non -habitable, religious architectural features integral to the church design. TMC 18.50.080 Exemption of Rooftop Appurtenances states "The height limitations specified in this chapter shall not apply to church spires, monuments, chimneys, water towers, elevator towers, mechanical equipment, and other similar rooftop appurtenances usually required to be placed above the roof level and not intended for human occupancy or the provision of additional floor area; provided, that mechanical equipment rooms or attic spaces are set back at least 10 feet from the edge of the roof and do not exceed 20 feet in height." The proposed development meets the Tukwila Urban Center and Shoreline development standards regarding building height. 3. The proposed use shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. Traffic from the church will be most noticeable during Sunday mornings and at the occasional festival or large event held on a weekend. The parking lot will be expanded with project approval, and vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns significantly improved. Parking management for the occasional large event or festival is provided via agreements with the owners of three nearby sites. The Traffic Management Plan (Attachment F) shows the location of these three areas. Two are private properties and the third location is on street parking on Olympic Ave S, Cascade Ave S and Riverside Dr. No on street parking is allowed on these 15 29 streets unless a street use permit is obtained from the City's Public Works Department and traffic control plan approved by the City. The applicant has previously obtained this permit for past events. The church has a fleet of three vans and two busses that will transport parishioners and festival attendees between these overflow parking areas and the church property. Pedestrian circulation within and access to the site will be improved via a sidewalk extension along Sperry Drive, marked crosswalk, distinctive pedestrian pathways from the parking areas to the Learning Center and church buildings, and a marked route and dedicated easement providing pedestrian public access to the shoreline. Outdoor noise associated with traffic or events held at the church could be heard from the adjacent Wells Fargo bank parcels and potentially across the river, where the primary uses are offices and warehouses operating during weekdays only. As the church has existed in its current location and design for many years with minimal conflicts with the neighborhood and no additional increase in parishioners is anticipated, approval of the CUP will not decrease the church's compatibility within the neighborhood. 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The proposed church expansion implements several goals and policies in the Tukwila Urban Center and Shoreline chapters of the 2015 Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 10- Tukwila's Urban Center 10.2.4 Pedestrian Accessibility. Ensure that pedestrians have safe, convenient and comfortable paths from adjacent public ways to key building entrances. This could include utilizing driveways or internal streets with sidewalks for access to primary entrances, or by providing clearly marked pathways through large parking lots from the public sidewalks and from parked cars to key building entrances. There should be minimum interruption to the pedestrian pathway by driveways and other vehicular conflicts. Chapter 5- Shorelines 5.4.2 Design and locate public access in a way that is appropriate for the site, depending on site conditions and private property concerns. 5.5.1 Require that shoreline development outside of the MIC: • Ensures no net loss of shoreline function; • Is designed to be consistent with Tukwila river design guidelines; • Reflects principles of high -quality design in such areas as site planning, architecture and landscaping; and • Includes setbacks, bulk, height, density, landscape buffers and provisions for open space that enhance the shoreline environment The proposed redevelopment of the site includes dedicated public access and meets the design guidelines of the zone where its situated and the Shoreline, as well as the no net loss criteria of 16 30 the Shoreline Master Plan. Improvements proposed to fulfill the above Tukwila Urban Center and Shoreline Comprehensive Plan policies include enhanced landscaping, better stormwater drainage design and a new stormwater detention tank, and sidewalk and pedestrian crossing upgrades. 5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The possible adverse impacts stemming from the church's expansion are minor and primarily limited to the parking impacts associated with the occasional large event or festival, and removal of trees in the Shoreline. As the parking spaces provided exceed code requirements for the church and school uses, the parking impacts are limited to the occasional events or festivals hosted by the church onsite. During these events or festivals, the site experiences a temporary increased demand for parking while the supply of parking spaces is decreased due to the construction of temporary stages and structures supporting the festival. The applicant has submitted a traffic management plan that utilizes offsite parking areas and the Church's fleet of vehicles to transport festival attendees to and from the property; an additional 359 parking spaces are available to event attendees via these overflow parking spaces. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and recording a Shared or Covenant Parking Agreement between the subject property and the adjoining overflow parking area properties if either: the seating is expanded such that site does not meet the requirement of one parking space per four seats, or if the parking demand cannot be met on the property and there are off -site parking impacts as determined by the City. The language of the Shared or Covenant Parking Agreement shall be approved by the City and shall be consistent with TMC 18.56.070. Also, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a street use permit from the City's Public Works Department to use on street parking on Olympic Ave S, Cascade Ave S and Riverside Drive. Additionally, the applicant shall adopt a Parking Management Program for special events that shall include the following: a) Information and education: Educate the congregation families to encourage them to carpool, use transit, bike, or walk to the church. b) Demand Reduction Strategies: Establish a preferred parking area for families and groups that carpool with four or more persons per car; c) Demand Management Strategies: Continue to implement measures to ensure that sufficient parking is available. These measures could include agreements with the surrounding businesses; shuttles; establishing a team of parking attendants to help direct drivers to available parking locations. The impact the removal of 5 trees may have on riverine habitat has been compensated for by planting 28 new evergreen plantings close to the levee (along the parking lot perimeter and between the church's southern facade and the levee) and additional deciduous trees planted inside the parking areas and within the Shoreline Overlay. 17 31 CONCLUSIONS 1. Criteria 1: The improvements planned will improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation, create additional access to the trail and shoreline, and improve the quality of development significantly while maintaining the site's use as a church serving the Catholic Vietnamese community in Tukwila and environs. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. 2. Criteria 2: The proposed church expansion meets the setback, landscaping, parking and building height standards of the Tukwila Urban Center- Workplace District, Commercial and Workplace Corridor standards for streets in the Tukwila Urban Center, and development standards required of projects within the Shoreline Overlay. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. 3. Criteria 3: As the church has existed in its current location and design for many years with minimal conflicts with the neighborhood and no additional increase in parishioners is anticipated, approval of the CUP will not decrease the church's compatibility within the neighborhood. The proposed uses shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. 4. Criteria 4: The project's enhanced landscaping, better stormwater drainage design, new stormwater detention tank, and sidewalk and pedestrian crossing upgrades implement several Tukwila Urban Center and Shoreline Comprehensive Plan Policies. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. 5. Criteria 5: The potential for parking impacts related to occasional events and festivals and habitat impacts stemming from the removal of 5 trees near the levee have been alleviated by a traffic management plan providing an additional 359 parking spaces and shuttle service via overflow parking lots, and the planting of 28 trees near the levee in and deciduous trees planted throughout the Shoreline parking areas. In order to alleviate any potential offsite parking impacts the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and recording a Shared or Covenant Parking Agreement between the subject property and the adjoining overflow parking area properties if demand cannot be met onsite. Also, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a street use permit from the City's Public Works Department to use on street parking on Olympic Ave S, Cascade Ave S and Riverside Drive. Additionally, the applicant shall adopt a Parking Management Program for special events. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. 18 32 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the above findings and conclusions and approval of the conditional use permit including Attachments A and B with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and recording a Shared or Covenant Parking Agreement between the subject property and the adjoining overflow parking area properties if either: the seating is expanded such that site does not meet the requirement of one parking space per four seats, or if the parking demand cannot be met on the property and there are off - site parking impacts as determined by the City. The language of the Shared or Covenant Parking Agreement shall be approved by the City and shall be consistent with TMC 18.56.070. Also, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a street use permit from the City's Public Works Department to use on street parking on Olympic Ave S, Cascade Ave S and Riverside Drive. 2. The applicant shall adopt a Parking Management Program for special events that shall include the following: a) Information and education: Educate the congregation families to encourage them to carpool, use transit, bike, or walk to the church. b) Demand Reduction Strategies: Establish a preferred parking area for families and groups that carpool with four or more persons per car; c) Demand Management Strategies: Continue to implement measures to ensure that sufficient parking is available. These measures could include agreements with the surrounding businesses; shuttles; establishing a team of parking attendants to help direct drivers to available parking locations. Additionally, staff recommends that the expiration date of the conditional use permit be extended to match the expiration of the underlying shoreline substantial development permit. Under WAC 197-27-090, construction shall commence within two years of the effective date of the shoreline permit; and substantial development be complete within 5 years. One year extension can be granted by the Department of Community Development Director based on reasonable factors 19 33 DESIGN REVIEW L18-0038 Tukwila Municipal Code Table 18-1 specifies which criteria apply to developments meeting certain thresholds within the Tukwila Urban Center. The proposed church redevelopment is classified as "Other large-scale new construction or exterior expansions" in the Workplace District, so the below criteria are applicable to the Design Review application. Tukwila Municipal Code 18.70.090 Nonconforming Landscape Areas requires all projects undergoing Design Review to comply with current landscaping requirements. The Board of Architectural Review may modify the requirements in circumstances where strict compliance would create substantial practical difficulties, the existing and proposed additional landscaping and screening materials together will adequately screen or buffer possible use incompatibilities, soften the barren appearance of parking or storage areas, and/or adequately enhance the premises appropriate to the use district and location of the site. In the following discussion, the District standards of the Workplace zone are described and the project's adherence to the standards is discussed. Following the District standards, the project proposal is assessed for compliance with the Tukwila Urban Center's Corridor Standards for Workplace and Commercial Corridors, the Supplemental Standards, and other parking and landscaping requirements. Finally, the Design Review criteria for commercial and light industrial projects from TMC Section 18.60.050(B) are shown below in italics, followed by Staff's comments on how the church redevelopment proposal compares to the guidelines. District -Based Standards I. District -Based Standards Structure Height (TMC 18.28.070): The Learning Center's height is single -story and well below the 45 ft. height limit. The proposed church building reaches a maximum height of 45 feet for the habitable areas, which is in conformance with the building height restriction of 45 feet for the TUC-WP zone. Footnote 1 on Table 18-3- District Standards states "portions of the building that extend above the primary building mass, such as non -habitable space (clock towers, roof -top cupolas, elevator and mechanical equipment enclosures), unenclosed space (roof deck trellises, gazebos), and other special architectural features, shall not exceed the maximum height requirement by more than 20 feet, provided they are set back a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the roof (see also TMC 18.50.080). Maximum Block Face Length (TMC 18.28.080): The site does not propose any new streets, and Sperry Drive is less than 900 linear feet long. Side and Rear Setbacks and Landscaping Requirements (TMC 18.28.100-.110): Both the Learning Center and church buildings meet the 5-foot rear and side yard setback requirements. There are no landscaping requirements for side and rear yard setbacks in the TUC-WP District. 20 34 II. Corridor -Based Standards S. 180t" Street is classified as a Commercial Corridor and Sperry Drive is a Workplace Corridor. S. 180t" Street is a public street maintained by the City while Sperry Drive is a private street; a tract jointly maintained by the church and Wells Fargo. Public Frontage Standards (TMC 18.28.150): Unfortunately, the steep slope forming the site's northern boundary prevents construction of a sidewalk along S. 180t" Street. There is currently no sidewalk here, and discussions with Public Works staff revealed there is no reasonably feasible alternative allowing for a sidewalk along this section of the street. Because there is no reasonable way to install a sidewalk along S. 180t" Street, the 6' wide requirement can be waived. The landscaped steep slope from the Learning Center's northern parking area to the street exceeds the 9 ft. of landscaping required of Commercial Corridors. The 15 ft. wide landscaping strip along the east side of Sperry Drive exceeds the 9 ft. of landscaping required of Workplace Corridors. The over pruned and struggling existing trees and gravel surface will be replaced by a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees, shrubs and groundcover. The sidewalk extension and pedestrian crossing along Sperry Dr. meet the frontage standards of Workplace Corridors. The infeasibility of a sidewalk along S. 180t" Street, the presence of healthy trees on the west side of Sperry Drive and struggling trees on the east side of the street all combined to influence the proposed pedestrian improvements. The proposed configuration preserves the healthy, mature streetscape landscaping along the Wells Fargo parcels while improving mobility and connectivity. Building Orientation/Placement & Landscaping (TMC 18.28.160-.190): Neither S. 180t" Street nor Sperry Drive require building orientation to the street. Both Commercial and Workplace Corridors allow parking in the front, rear or side yard. The proposed project has parking along S. 180t" Street and Sperry Drive, and in front of, on the side and in the rear of buildings. III. Supplemental Standards Special Corner Feature (TMC 18.28.220): No special corner feature is planned; the criterion is not applicable. Landscaping Types and General Landscaping Requirements (TMC 18.28.230-.240): There is no requirement for landscaping in the setbacks, but both S. 180t" Street and Sperry Drive corridor types require a 9' wide landscaping strip at the back of the curb. Perimeter and interior landscaping square footage requirements of the Tukwila Urban Center and areas within the Shoreline have been satisfied. Landscaping islands and trees provided within the landscape islands are consistent with the code requirements. The City's Urban Environmentalist has reviewed and approved the proposed plant material to ensure appropriate species selection and spacing. The applicant will need to provide irrigation plans and planting details in conformance with the TMC 18.28 with the building permit application as a condition of approval. 21 35 The spacing of landscape islands in the parking lot is slightly modified for a section of parking just south and west of the Learning Center. A 30' wide easement for the Rood Control District is required to route through this general area to the levee bank for levee maintenance purposes. An additional reason is that historically during the church's Summer Festival, a stage has been placed in this area of the parking lot. The parish would like this area to remain free of structures and impediments not just for the easement but also to maintain the flexibility of placing a temporary stage here. Accordingly, the landscaped islands are placed a little further apart than in other parking areas, yet still are placed no further than 150' apart per a requirement of areas within the Shoreline Overlay. TMC 18.28.240.B.6.b(3) provides for such accommodation: "Flexibility is allowed for the layout of parking lots and landscaped areas, but the goal is to provide shade from trees that are evenly distributed throughout the parking lot." Open Space Regulations (TMC 18.28.250): Only multifamily residential and office uses are required to provide open space in the Workplace District; this criterion is not applicable. General Parking Requirements and Guidelines (TMC 18.28.260-.270): The proposed project provides 415 parking stalls, which is above the 360 number of parking stalls required for religious use and high school parking standards per number of classrooms. The parking lot meets requirements for compact car stalls, stall dimensions, setbacks, curb cuts, access, and provision of pedestrian walkways. Parking lot landscaping, layout, and bicycle parking are provided per code requirements. TMC 18.28.260.D.5.b. requires that pedestrian pathways be separated from vehicular parking and travel lanes by use of contrasting paving material, curbing, or landscaping and may be raised above the vehicular pavement. The site plan shows that the pedestrian pathways are 6' wide, have small sections of concrete but are mostly comprised of warm -colored pervious pavement. Site Requirements (TMC 18.28.280): Pedestrian pathways through the parking area have been provided to facilitate pedestrian circulation and reduce plant damage from pedestrian traffic. The pedestrian crosswalks within the parking lot shall be finished with the same pervious pavement as that used in the plaza in order to enhance pedestrian safety, comfort, and the attractiveness of the site. Commercial and Light Industrial Design Review Criteria. The following criteria shall be considered in all cases, except that multi -family and hotel or motel developments shall use the multi -family, hotel and motel design review criteria; developments within the MUO, NCC and RC districts of the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor (see Figure 18-9) shall use the Tukwila International Boulevard design review criteria of this chapter; and developments within the TSO district shall use the Tukwila South design review criteria instead: 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. 22 36 c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. Frontage improvements along Sperry Drive provide a significantly improved pedestrian environment, allow for public access to the Shoreline, and save the mature landscaping existing along the east side of the street. Protected and marked pathways within the site's parking help to provide safe travel routes for pedestrians. The principle refuse and disposal area will remain in the same location after redevelopment, but with redevelopment, this area will be enclosed behind a split cmu wall with a door. This refuse area is behind the church in the loading and small parking area at the building's southwest corner; it will be screened from the river by the existing grove of mature evergreen trees and the additional evergreens proposed to be planted between this parking and refuse area and the levee. The refuse area for the Learning Center is on the eastern elevation, on the southern side of the building. This refuse area will also be enclosed, with materials to match the Learning Center's exterior building finishes. The project utilizes decorative awnings, roofline differentiation, variation in materials, vertical and horizontal modulation, and architectural details including weather -protection awnings for a second floor arcade and a stage to reduce the perceived scale and add visual interest. The proposed project meets the site design criteria. 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA. a. Harmony of texture, lines and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. The French colonial architectural style of the church has easily identifiable entrances, unifying the massing and notable architectural elements such as the dome and the bell towers and spires. Landscape transition to the river is provided with interior and perimeter parking lot landscaping improvements proposed, adding to the existing mature evergreen trees located on the site's northeast and southern edges. The proposal's vehicular traffic patterns will be modified and more organized with project approval, all paved areas will have the direction of traffic indicated by markings on the pavement. The vehicular entrances to the site are clearly defined by landscaping improvements, and loading facilities are appropriately located behind the Learning Center and church buildings, screened from the street. The design criteria are met. 3. LANDSCAPING AND SITE TREATMENT. a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. 23 37 b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety, and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards and other places that tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The site is bordered on three sides by the Green River and the Green River Trail. This significant amenity will be enhanced with the landscaping improvements and public access provided for by the redevelopment proposal. The potential for shading along the river's edge in particular has increased substantially by the proposal, with 28 large western red cedar and Douglas Fir trees proposed for the area about 125' from the OHWM; the closest area to the river that the church may plant trees due to the restriction of vegetative plantings on the levee berm. Throughout the new parking areas, landscaped islands are positioned no more than 150 feet apart. These landscaped areas are planted with deciduous trees, shrubs and groundcover. The plans show 4,457 sf2 of new landscaping proposed with project approval. There are small landscaped areas framing the church's northern facade adjacent to the ramps to the sanctuary, between the two entrances, and hugging the building's northeast corner, enhancing the church's architectural features. The landscaping plan submitted at this time does not include planting, soil and irrigation details. At the time of building plan submittal, applicant shall submit irrigation and planting details in conformance with the requirements of TMC 18.28; Tukwila Urban Center. Frontage improvements along Sperry Drive provide a significantly improved pedestrian environment, allow for public access to the Shoreline, and save the mature landscaping existing along the east side of the street. Protected and marked pathways within the site's parking help to provide safe travel routes for pedestrians. A pervious pavement open plaza along the church's northern entrances provides open space for parishioners to mingle and gather before and after services. The principle refuse and disposal area will remain in the same location after redevelopment, but with redevelopment, this area will be enclosed behind a split cmu wall with a door. This refuse area is behind the church in the loading and small parking area at the building's southwest 24 38 corner; it will be screened from the river by the existing grove of mature evergreen trees and the additional evergreens proposed to be planted between this parking and refuse area and the levee. The refuse area for the Learning Center is on the eastern elevation, on the southern side of the building. The exterior pole -style lighting fixtures are compatible with the building design, and are designed to shield the river from artificial light from the site. Building -mounted fixtures are proposed. Downward- facing sconces will be used to provide lighting for walkways, entrances and public areas adjacent to the church and Learning Center. 4. BUILDING DESIGN. a. Architectural style is not restricted; evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. The project meets the design criteria, with conditions. The French colonial architectural style of the church has easily identifiable entrances, unifies the massing and notable architectural elements such as the dome and the bell towers and spires. The primary entrance to the church on the north side of the building has high visibility (large concrete steps to the entrance, framed by tall bell towers) and is consistent with the building's architectural style. The Learning Center is a secondary building on the site and is appropriately designed to be less prominent than the church, including the location and design of the entrances. The project utilizes decorative awnings, roofline differentiation, variation in materials, vertical and horizontal modulation, and architectural details including weather -protection awnings for a second floor arcade and a stage to reduce the perceived scale and add visual interest. The ground floor facade of both the church and Learning Center is finished with a stone veneer (first 4' of building height) to provide horizontal articulation and a durable and distinct base. The clay tile of the church and Learning Center and metal ribbed roofing materials of the church are distinctive in color and materials from the facade finishes, distinguishing the tops of the buildings from the exterior walls. Additionally, the religious architectural features of bell towers and a 25 39 dome articulate distinctive rooflines for the church building. All facades of the Learning Center will be renovated to match the church's warm beige coloring and clay roofing tiles. The Learning Center will have Hardie Panel Vertical Siding in Sail Cloth, a pale tan color matching the church's facade. The Learning Center will have the same stone veneer treatment applied to the bottom 4' of all facades (precast stone veneer- El Dorado Autumn Leaf) and will be reroofed in red clay roofing tiles (Boral Clay Tile- El Camino Blend). The applicant has proposed Stucco as an alternate material for Hardie Panel Vertical Siding. Also, Met Tile Metal Roofing Tile in Mission Clay color is proposed as an alternate material for roofing. The church building will use Nichiha Fiber Cement Panel in sandstone desert beige color with precast stone veneer- El Dorado Autumn Leaf along the base. Asc Ribbed metal roof is proposed for the dome and spires. Boral Clay Tile- El Camino Blend is proposed for the roof. The applicant has proposed Stucco as an alternate material for Hardie Panel Vertical Siding and Fiber Cement panel. Also, Met Tile Metal Roofing Tile in Mission Clay color is proposed as an alternate material for clay roofing. See Attachment H for photos of the proposed materials. Materials board shall be provided at the meeting. As no mechanical equipment or screening of equipment is shown on plans, the applicant will need to provide appropriate screening or renderings showing that all mechanical equipment will be screened from view at the time of building permit submittal. Staff recommends a condition requiring the applicant to provide appropriate screening or renderings showing that all mechanical equipment will be screened from view at the time of building permit submittal. The project is also subject to Shoreline Substantial Development permit and the design guidelines for properties within the shoreline zone are listed under TMC 18.44.110. These guidelines require screening of blank walls along the river. The landscape plan shall be revised to include trellises and vines or other vegetative screening to break up the massing of the large wall with no window openings on the south side of the church building. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE. a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. Miscellaneous features onsite are limited to the signage required for the designated public access, whose design is limited by conditions of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and the requirements of the Shoreline code, TMC Chapter 18.44. The lighting proposed along pedestrian pathways internal to the site is sufficient for the use of pedestrians using the public access pathway. This design criteria is met. 26 40 CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed project complies with the applicable District Based Standards; Corridor Based Standards and Supplemental Standards of the TMC 18.28 for the subject property; which lies in the TUC-WP zone. 2. The proposed project complies with the design review criteria listed under TMC 18.60.050 B. 3. The project complies with design guidelines for buildings in the shoreline zone as listed under TMC 18.44.110; provided additional vegetative screening is included to break up the massing of the blank wall on the south side of the church building. 4. The landscape plan submitted with the design review application needs additional details including irrigation, planting and soil details. A complete landscaping plan that includes all the details in conformance with the requirements of TMC 18.28 shall be submitted with the building permit. 5. Screening details for the mechanical equipment shall be required as part of the building permit submittal. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the above findings and design review approval for the Vietnamese Martyrs expansion with the conditions below: 1. At the time of building plan submittal, submit a complete and detailed landscaping plan that includes irrigation, planting and soil details in conformance with the requirements of TMC 18.28; Tukwila Urban Center. The landscape plan shall be revised to include trellises and vines or other vegetative screening to break up the massing of the large wall with no window openings on the south side of the church building. 2. At the time of building plan submittal, submit plans for screening mechanical equipment for the Learning Center and the church buildings, or create elevations and renderings showing that mechanical equipment will be screened from view. Additionally, staff recommends that the expiration date of the design review be extended to match the expiration of the underlying shoreline substantial development permit. Under WAC 197-27-090, construction shall commence within two years of the effective date of the shoreline permit; and substantial development be complete within 5 years. One year extension can be granted by the Department of Community Development Director based on reasonable factors. 27 41 42 SITE NOTES LEGEND IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 04 EAST, W.M. 08/17/17 rTh LII x Li U, rao cs� cal C) -�i :) c Z m Do C SITE ADDRESS: 6847 SOUTH 180TH ST 6841 SOUTH 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 362304-9079-04 362304-9017-09 362304- 9087- 04 ZONING: TU C ZONING AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 SOUTH CENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 SETBACKS: CURRENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN REVIEW. CURRENT SETBACKS MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE IN EFFECT DURING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BY THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION INDICATES THAT STRUCTURES ON THIS PROPERTY COMPLIED WITH MINIMUM SETBACK AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. FLOOD ZONE: THIS SITE APPEARS ON NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, DATED MAY 16, 1995, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 53033C0978F, AND IS SITUATED IN ZONE "X", AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND PORTIONS ALONG THE GREEN RIVER ARE LOCATED IN ZONE "AE" WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 27 FEET(NGVD 29) OR 30.59 FEET(NAVD88). HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83/91 VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 0119'01" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 1,320.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 88'04'53" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 180TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 431.81 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'55'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 36.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 180TH STREET AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88'04'53" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 257.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11'05'55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 70.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07'39'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09'22'49" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15'06'12" EAST A DISTANCE OF 39.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'04'53" WEST A DISTANCE OF 353.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'55'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 78.54 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'00'00" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9203301074. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 0119'01" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 1,320.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 88'04'53" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 180TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 381.81 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O1'55'07" WEST A DISTANCE OF 341.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DAVID F. BOLGER BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7606290589 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01'55'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6356645; THENCE SOUTH 88'04'53" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 353.52 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 4; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BOLGER PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 88'04'53" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE BOLGER PROPERTY, A DISTANCE OF 376.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TITLE REPORT REFERENCE: THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED ACCORDING TO THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN, FURNISHED BY CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 0032156-06, DATED JANUARY 30, 2015. THE EASEMENTS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON RELATE TO THIS COMMITMENT. DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A*: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 01°19'01" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 1,355.89 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG OF CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 02'45'45" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 336.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°32'04" TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 36 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 88'46'19" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 372.81 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'13'41" WEST A DISTANCE OF 305.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'46'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88'46'41" EAST ALONG A LINE 100 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND LEASED TO SPERRY LAND CORPORATION AS SURVEYED AND MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND IN 1968, A DISTANCE OF 420.58 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TOP OF THE LEFT BANK OF THE GREEN RIVER; THENCE ALONG SAID TOP OF THE LEFT BANK THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 07°00' EAST A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET; SOUTH 01 °06' WEST A DISTANCE OF 104 FEET; SOUTH 0912' WEST A DISTANCE OF 106 FEET; SOUTH 26'49' WEST A DISTANCE OF 102 FEET; SOUTH 47'21' WEST A DISTANCE OF 103 FEET; SOUTH 60'15' WEST A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET; SOUTH 74'35' WEST A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET; WEST A DISTANCE OF 106 FEET; NORTH 67'30' WEST A DISTANCE OF 107 FEET; NORTH 2619' WEST A DISTANCE OF 104 FEET; NORTH 20°22' WEST A DISTANCE OF 103 FEET; NORTH 21'54' WEST A DISTANCE OF 105 FEET; NORTH 32'38' WEST A DISTANCE OF 116 FEET; NORTH 44°04' WEST A DISTANCE OF 34 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 69'38'41" EAST; THENCE LEAVING SAID TOP OF LEFT BANK NORTH 69'38'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 225 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ASPH AW CB CC Co CONC CW DEC ECC Ecd EM EV GM G IP OHP OHT (P) PS (R) SSS Tcd TC/SL WM wv w ASPHALT SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE ASPHALT SIDEWALK CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT CONCRETE CONCRETE SIDEWALK DECIDUOUS TREE EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB ELECTRIC CONDUIT ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC VAULT FIRE HYDRANT GAS METER GAS MAIN IRON PIPE METAL LUMINARE METAL POWER POLE W/ LUMINARE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OVERHEAD TELEPHONE PAINTED UTILITY LOCATION PARKING STALL RECORD SANITARY SIDE SEWER TELEPHONE CONDUIT TRAFFIC CONTROL / SEATTLE LIGHT VAULT PAINTED TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT WATER METER WATER VAULT WATER MAIN WATER VALVE YARD LIGHT FD. 2"BRASS W/PUNCH IN CONCRETE IN DN. 0.7' 02/09/15 DISC CASE HELD AS 1 /16TH CORNER WARRA REC. N Q W LLJ u O (./) C7 _ �I U Om 00 D � a = Lu UJ O p v)01 'Cr ( FD, COPPER PIN IN 2-1/2" IRON PIPE IN CASE DN. 0.5' 02/09/15 W EST V AI-I-EY NIGHw AY LJ 0 - m d z 0 0 DEED 20330 074 PP 1 '32'53"W 82.26' o_ U) 36' 0 0 R=50.00 90°00'00" L=78.54' 0 CO 0 1< Lri 92 ( �G�o v1 , EDGE OF CONC. BRIDGE d z 0 0 3'41"W 50.00' FD. TACIrt IN BRASS PIN IN CONC IN CASE DN. 0.8' 02/09/15 GREEN_ - Mo )RIVER - BRICK C 0 0 3 .1' \G- APPROXIMATE / LOCATION OF EAST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, RECORDING NO. 76062905 50' N1A.26.29"W 0 o CO C. CURB "04' NOTE: TOP OF LEVEE FOLLOWS VERY NEAR THE PROPERTY LINE s50 S1 6 , 2 PS 118.6 BUILDING ACCES ACCESS CANOPY OWNER: CORPORATION OF CATHOLIC() ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE - J . ci. ADDRESS: 6847 SQU.IN-180TH ST N! TUKWILA, WA 98188 PARCEL NO.: 362304-9079 a Q 5 m 1-STORY MASONRY BUILDING BLDG. AREA:17,051 SQ.FT. PARCEL A 508'21'20"E 50.0 U Ib ACCESS 2 co m < LPING CCESS Z �o m q,2 BUILDING HEIGHT 13.e AT THIS LOCATION N' 74.0' BRICK COLUMNS (TYP.) - w 10"DON �❑ 7 COVERED WALKWAY DE018"DE GLU'TER18"DEQ CLUSTE Cl STER' 15' SIDE SETBACK LINE FD REBAR W/ CAP LEANING EAST PARCEL B: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ `-4"D 4'17EC/_.,CLUSTER LUST R'1= co 00 0 0 0 NO113'41 "E 255.00' ASP H a 0 SPERRY DRIVE (A PRIVATE STREET) OPT; OF LEVEE HAIN GA , >- m EW LEVEE BUFFER LINE PS 125' SETBACK LINE 200' SHORELINE SETBACK LINE 0 0 0 0 0 OWNER: CORPORATION OF CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE ADDRESS:6845 SOUTH 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 PARCEL NO.: 362304- 9017 18"DEC,. 18°DEC,.' 2Q DEC 18"DEC 2, 4 DEC \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ PARCEL B AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 0 0 0 0 0 0 C"CC 6.7' 7 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 0119'01" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 1,355.89 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 02'45'45" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 336.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 9.00, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'32'04" TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 36 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 88'46'19" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 422.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°13'41" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 78.54 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'00'00"; THENCE SOUTH 0113'41" WEST A DISTANCE OF 255.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'46'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF 48.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'13'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 255.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 78.54 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'00'00"; THENCE SOUTH 88°46'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 148.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. TITLE REPORT REFERENCE: THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED ACCORDING TO THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN, FURNISHED BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 611043090, DATED OCTOBER 30, 2012. THE EASEMENTS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON RELATE TO THIS COMMITMENT. 0 T 588'46'19"E 5.42' `c' SO7'00'00"E_11 RAVEL SOLID """"YELLOW T T 00 Ca V S01'06'00"W 104.00' GRAVEL GR PSS .. FFE=29.96' i i i SOg•12 ASPHA NEW LEVEE BUFFER LINE 0"w 106.00, rn FFE=29.93' OWNER: ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE ADDRESS:6801 SOUTH 180TH ST TUKWILA, WA 98188 PARCEL NO.: 362304-9087 "VIETNAMESE CHURCH OF MARTYRS" C U1IUTY INFORMATION SURVEYS BY BRH 200' SHORELINE SETBACK LINE i 2 i NITY NOT TO SCALE 125' SETBACK LINE ol A 40 NEW LEVEE BUFFER LINE 0 20 40 1 inch = 40 ft. ATTACHMENT A cci 0 cn Lo 00 LU Uj Et 0 co LU co 00 0 ADDED PARCEL A AND B CALLOUTS 0 co CD OC LLJ LLJ Fr - CID 00 CJD oo 0 0 LIJ BROADERICK ARCH ING COUNTY drawn by JRM checked by TRS scale date 8/9/17 201 501 6.03 1 of 1 sheet 43 44 IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT 2:15 PM ON Friday, September 21, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, ITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OTHER PROJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR AR NTS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE A THIS DOCUMEN PHASE 1: LEARNING CENTER ADDITION AND PARKING LOT RENOVATION PHASE 2: PARTIAL CHURCH DEMOLITION AND 2 STORY CONSTRUCTION PHASE 3: INTERIOR RENOVATION TO REMAINDER OF CHURCH PHASE DIAGRAMS 0 Q 5 w 0 w= 1-o V)1 2O 0a co 1— a �w U 0 w a y T�- i 1 T i / EDGEOF COW; BRIDGE CONC. RE? BRICK COLUMNS (TYP REMOVE TREE FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAINF FOR LEARNING CENTER Nis 10" 1 18" CON 1 1 PARKING LOT EXTENSION TO COVER PART OF EXISTING ACCESS ROAD 5-24"CED \G� ................... 1 RELOCATE 1 •-------•— ---•--- -- CHI NGATE F-. `.." __'-_—•__�,; �.'..•`��.... —•% REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING �� 1 -- #1 - 6" DEC. •1 9 DECIDUOUS TREE `:: GAZEBO FOR PARKING 1 1 �1 \ \ FOR PARKING LOT EXPANSION �.. LOT EXPANSION {•""-� �'''r 1 m 'wf�t \\ \ \ \\ + ." DEC -REMOVE BASKETBALL 1ie 1 ,w.�� \\ \\ s e 1� HOOP FOR PARKING r 1 / wow % vv vv v% • NEW LEVEE ( LOT EXPANSION -, 't,, I w•� f� \\ BUFFER LINE% . 1 ..`�� 1 ... NEW L VEE «e%• \\ \\ ` \ \ 1 I BUFFE LINE _1 \ \ \ ` 1 'G P I. ETBAGK LINE �t \ \ \ \ ` ` \ •� G ' 4. EXISTING GRAVEL PATH TO BE REMOVED of $ % \\ `\ \\ ; \\ %\� ' + .' \\ FOR PARKING LOT EXPANSION �• $ % ; \ \ \ \ ��'' \2° + ! \ 1 EASEMENT TO BE I,�s • �\ Zj� \ \ k�' \ ��t \ \ \ NG \ I.1 RELOCATED ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 ---- � '\ `\ RESTRIPE PARKING LOT \\ ` '�i `�' �` i•._ -- ` \ \ \ \ .Y' \ \ \ \ aln� `.. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE I it \ \ \ \ JI' \ \ \ \ `` .� SLAB FOR PARKING LOT EXPANSION �,7a ! \ �Y' \ \ \ \ ��� �� -- A w ---- `�k' \\ \ \\ `REMOVE CURB AND LAMP `.. .... .' �.• \ _ �!m\y \ \� FOR DRIVE AISLE `.. s� ' \\ w —_-- i4 .` `%. vv _—_— RESTRIPE PARKING LOT ',�`... ��• .0s%'i REMOVE PART OF EXISTING ` i� 'I'''. ' ' t — \ % '`� %`� .'' CONCRETE CURB FOR i co ---- �` .`.�`, �`. NEW COVERED PARKING ENTRANCE \ i --- V • `, REMOVE CURB FOR DRIVE AISLE ; i I %.--• \ REMOVE PARKING STALLS \ ` i r _ _ _ _� FOR DRIVE AISLE v I �� \ \ j EXISTING COVERED WALKWAY �- — — i�, i' Y J\� NORTH PART OF EXISTING �Rv \\\ BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED \ j (ROOF, COLUMNS AND WALKWAY) K .8 TO BE DEMOLISHED FOR NEW �a \a'OI� \\�\ FOR CHURCH EXPANSION �\ ADDITION% .//' \ \ i /. • i L_:___ PARKING STALLS TO BE ELIMINATED `'�J — \\ j r----- 1 Ir6'G� v �v v i REMOVE (2) TREES FOR NEW ADDITION ' 1/ �\ REMOVE (6) CHERRY TREES IN �i\ ,"".\ e� \ THIS AREA FOR NEW CHURCH ...� \ #4-16"FIR — 'J — —4 —I — — — — } — — — — — , j � / ''t i \ b 1 \ REMOVE EXISTING CANOPY ' A ��•� �.. \\ AND WALKWAY `\ ____ _______-.,r��::-1- __ #2 - 8" CHERRY RELOCATE TRANSFORMERS •--•-------_L_--�--' �""—"- "— \ FOR NEW COVERED PARKING ENTRANCE i REMOVE PART OF EXISTING CONCRETE r��'•� r SPERRY DRIVE (A PRIVATE STREET) EXISTING BUILDING DEMOLITION LEGEND - - TO BE DEMOLISHED TO REMAIN s A 9- Xe• TREE TO BE DEMO'D T T TREE TO REMAIN DEMOLITION NOTE DEMOLITION NOTE v MH RIM-29 34 CURB FOR NEW PARKING LOT ENTRANCE N SITE PLAN -EXISTING & DEMOLITION 1" =40' #3 - 18" CONF. REMOVE (3) PARKING STALLS FOR NEW RAMP 200' SHORELINE SETBACK LINE RELOCATE EXISTING STREETLIGHT ELIMINATE (6) PARKING STALLS FOR NEW COVERED PARKING ENTRANCE REMOVE (1) CONIFEROUS TREE FOR NEW CHURCH 125' SETBACK LINE % @e NEW LEVEE: BUFFER LINE!' EXHIBIT 'C' - 10/10/18 TREES TO BE REMOVED IN SHORELINE ATTACHMENT A 4532 REGISTERED ARCHITECT I ■ LEARNING CENTER ADDITION AND CHURCH EXPANSION 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 VIETNAMESE MARTYRS PARISI 1 ■ 1 . Pin Plot Date: 9/21/18 Erik New_Vietnamese_ Martyrs_ Master_ Plan_ AC_21 pin BRODERICK ARCI ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION REVISED DRAWINGS N ■ 1 SITE PLAN - EXISTING AND DEMOLITION 4/2/18 A3 45 46 YRIGHT © 10:35 AM ON Monday, October 15, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC OJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR ARRANGEMENT IN WIRTING CO NTS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OT THIS DOCUMENT REPRE PARKING REQUIREMENTS 18.28.260 PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS FACILITIES PER TABLE 18-5, 18-7 • 1 Parking stall per 4 fixed seats • 1 bicycle space per 50 parking stalls PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR HIGH SCHOOLS PER TABLE 18-5, 18-7 • 1 Parking stall for each staff member plus 2 for every 5 students or visitors • 1 bicycle space per 50 parking stalls PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR ELEMENTARY & JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS PER TABLE 18-5, 18-7 • 1.5 Parking stalls for each staff member • 1 bicycle space per classroom Maximum of 30% of total off-street parking may be designed for compact cars The Director can modify the number of required parking stalls as a Type 2 Decision if the use is not specifically mentioned in tables 18-5, 18-7 A reduction in minimum parking requirements may be requested per TMC 18.56.140 "Administrative Variance from Parking Standards" - up to 10% reduction would be administrative — over 10% would require a hearing See figure 18-6 for parking stall dimensions Maximum slope of parking spaces 5% Maximum slope of entrance/exit driveways 15% Wheel stops required at periphery of lot Walkways in lots are required if there are sidewalks adjacent to the lots Lighting is required in parking lots for security and safety (light levels, number/location of poles not specified) A B C D E F Parking Angle Stall Width Stall Depth Aisle Width Curb Length Unit Width 1-way traffic 2-way traffic 1-way traffic 2-way traffic 0° 8.5 8.5 12 20 23 29 37 30° 8* 15* 11 20 16* 41* 54* 60° 8* 8.5 18* 21 17.5* 17.5 20 20 9.2* 9.8 53.5 59.5 56* 62 90° 8* 8.5 9 16* 19 19 24 24 23 25 25 24 8* 8.5 9 56* 62 61 57* 63 62 *These figures are for use with compact cars on y. Any bays that contain combined compact and normal spaces shall be designed for normal spaces. Curb Length (E) Aisle f stall width or depth (B or C) Aisle or Street \ Stall Depth Perpendicular to Aisle (Cl Curb Length (E) I is SIDEWALK WIDTHS Unit Width (F) Angled Parking MINOR ARTERIAL* PRINICIPAL ARTERIAL* TUKWILA URBAN CENTER (SEE NOTE 1) 5' 6' 6' Parallel Parking ti ti 4 EDGE OF COW 6WDGE BRICK COLUMNS(T 66: • PROP LINE CANOPY S1°13'41"W 50 00' SETBACK LIr4 T▪ RASH/RECYCLING 018.6` PHASE 1 1 LEARNING CENTER ADDITION, PARKING LOT AND LANDSCAPING LEARNING CENTER BUILDING OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BLDG EXISTING BUILDING (DASHED LINE) 4111141111111111111111110 15' SIDE SPERRY DRIVE (A PRIVATE STREET) EXISTING BUILDING SITE PLAN NOTES I ▪ PHASE 1 - LEARNING CENTER ADDITION, PARKING LOT AND LANDSCAPING Avork ✓ I —� PHASE 2 - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING, NEW ' CHURCH WITH OFFICES OVER COVERED PARKING ▪ — r-7 I I PHASE 3 - RENOVATION OF EXISTING HALL AND CAFETERIA ▪ — d NEW LANDSCAPING - SEE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE PLAN TOP trip F'1.EVEE TRANSFORMERS TO REMAIN PROPOSED STRIPING AND BOLLARDS FOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION NOTE: FUTURE EASEMENT FOR LEVEE MAINTENANCE TO BE PROVIDED THIS AREA 0' J, LEVEE PROTECION EASEMENT NO. 20101004002883 SMALL MONUMENT SIGN 1" = 40' <oe NOTE: SEE A5 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR PARKING SPACE AND AISLE DIMENSIONS, NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS, AREA OF PERVIOUS PAVEMENT, AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 0LGATION TANK '1 06100 PLATFORM NEW LEVEE BUFFER ` PHASE 21 PHASE 3 f y DEMOLITION OF EXISTING, NEW CHURCH WITH RENOVATION OF EXISTING HALL \ OFFICES OVER COVERED PARKING X AND CAFETERIA ‘ ELECTRIC CAR CHARGING (2 STALLS) ` \‘ OUTLINE OF X PROPOSED BLDG ` EXISTING BUILDING (DASHED LINE) X X PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW HYDRANT BICYCLE PARKING (12 STALLS) HARDSCAPING AND LANDSCAPING y5.1-ANPEt CONCRETE ...OR PAVERS IN FRONT IV STEPS (SIMILARAThLEARNING CENTER EN2ANCE) 200' SHORELINE SETBACK LINE 125' SETBACK LINE o1 TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURE EXISTING TREES', TO REMAIN, EXTENSION TO PAVED' ' ACCESS ROAD. ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE MIN. '12'- WIDE' ADDITIONAL EVERGREEN, TREES PROVIDED TO MEET PERIMETER ITREE REQ'MT' NEWLEVEE" BUFFER LINE � _._...._..._ 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION PARKING REQUIREMENT MATRIX A PARKING REQ'D WEEKDAY -MORNINGS WEEKDAY -AFTERNOON WEEKDAY -NIGHTS WEEKEND WEEKEND MASS ATTACHMENT PARKING RATIO SIZE USE LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOMS 1.5 / STAFF MEMBER 20 CLASSROOMS 35 X X LEARING CENTER KITCHEN & RECEPTION 1/PERSON (# OCC. FROM IBC 1004.1.2) KITCHEN 909 SF, RECEPTION 6 X X CHURCH AUDITORIUM 1/100 SF 18,132 SF 182 X X CHURCH CAFETERIA 1/100 SF 6,040 SF 61 X X CHURCH KITCHEN 1/PERSON (# OCC. FROM IBC 1004.1.2) 3,160 SF 16 X X X X CHURCH SANCTUARY 1/4 FIXED SEATS 1,318 FIXED SEATS 330 X CHURCH CHAPEL 1/4 FIXED SEATS 160 FIXED SEATS 40 X CHURCH CLASSROOMS 1.5 / STAFF MEMBER 6 CLASSROOMS 9 X X CHURCH OFFICES 3/1,000 SF 3,667 SF 11 X X X X TOTAL 27 27 320 320 370 !"#$%&'($)*+,$-1,0+12'3"4'567'8+2*,$'9:;<'$_>$.#'0+#>?$1'./, 0+12'@/%$-'"1'1*4@$"'3-»*./1#%'/%'-$#$,4+1$-'@A'BC7'9DDEFFFG Inns,,,,,,C+>A>H$'./,0+12'%./>$%'#,,,@$' „1+-$-&'9G (*E) Electric vehicle charging stations to be provided: 2 370 STALLS REQUIRED (486 STALLS PROPOSED) I ■ LEARNING CENTER ADDITION AND CHURCH EXPANSION 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 VIETNAMESE MARTYRS PARISI I ■ 1 #PIn Plot Date: 10/15118 Sean Hill New_Vietnamese_ Martyrs_ Master_Plan_AC_21.pIn BRODERICK ARCI I ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION REVISED DRAWINGS TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURES ADDED �N N O I ■ I ■ 1 SITE PLAN - 4/2/18 A4 PROPOSED 47 48 IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT 2:15 PM ON Friday, September 21, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, ITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OTHER PROJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR AR NTS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE A THIS DOCUMEN LUMINAIRE TYPE SL1 (SL2 SIMILAR) Sp ecifi cations 1111 E P A : Length: 5 W idth: H e i g h i W e ig h t (m a n ): 36 Ibs D -Series Size 2 LED A re a L u m in a ire NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY W �ightmg facts LUMINAIRE TYPE W1 d"series Specifications L u o in W id t h: D e p t h: H e ig h t: 18-1/2" W eight: 21 lb 1 7-1/8 " D -Series Size 2 LED W all L u m in a ire NIGHTTIME facts FRIENDLY Back Box (B B W) W id the D e p t h: H eight: W 5-1/2" 89W 1 lb W eight: 1 - 1 / 2 " 11 LIGHTING LEGEND SYMBOL LABEL QTY. ARRANGEMENT DESCRIPTION W1 27 SINGLE ACUITY DSXW2 LED 20C 700 40K T3M MVOLT 0 SL1 2 SINGLE ACUITY DSX2 LED P1 40K T3M MVOLT 0 SL2 3 BACK -BACK ACUITY DSX2 LED P1 40K T3M MVOLT 0 SL1-H 3 SINGLE DSX2 LED P1 40K T3M MVOLT HS 0 SL1-5 1 SINGLE DSX2 LED P1 40K T5M MVOLT NOTE: MH = MOUNTING HEIGHT CALCULATION SUMMARY LABEL CALCTYPE UNITS AVG MAX MIN AVG/MIN MAX/MIN BUFFER ILLUMINANCE Fc 0.63 1.4 0.1 6.30 14.00 PARKING ILLUMINANCE Fc 2.07 6.7 0.3 6.90 22.33 RIVER ILLUMINANCE Fc 0.00 0.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. 0.0 0 0 W I---- MH: 10 WALL PACK LIGHT AT 10'-0" ABOVE GRADE TYPICAL LEARNING CENTER WW1 W1 MH: 10 1.5 1:'4' 0 9 �Q • 0. 9 0 .9 0. 9 0. •.+ 0. 1 8--- 0.8 +0.7 3 `1. .9 +1.8 +1.6 ..... �2,.10.. 2.2 2.0 ,3 2.4 2.1 +2 . 6 2. 0 ,. .3 2 . 6 2 .1 2 . 5 2 . 0 ...:...... 2.0 0...: 1.9 +1.7 1.4 +1.6 1. 9 1.7 1.5 3.2 L1-H MH: 20 4 . 4 +4 . 0 +3 . 7 , 2 .4 3.2 3.5 3.• 4.4 2.7 :.�"0 6 1. 3 b 6.... 1.5 .9 +2.1 7.8 1.8 1.7 +1.4 1.0 2.0 2. 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.1 2.3 7...<0..4......0.5- +0.6 +0.8 NO WORK THIS AREA - NO WORK THIS AREA" 3. 6 3. 4 •T 2. 9 2 . 6 2. ®• l :1'�t%2'�•�io 2.2 2.7 2.3.3 2 CHURCH ..6 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.6 2.2 2.6 +0 . 9 +0 . ' +0 . 7 +0 . 8 n 2 1. 0 +1 1. • r� r WALL PACK LIGHT AT 12'-0" ABOVE .00 GRADE TYPICAL W1 MH:,„ 1.2' UMINAIRE PLAN 1" = 40' ATTACHMENT A - Id Fh N= 0= re a wa m� o Z 0 W W ~ Y H L, en I ■ 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 )NDITIONAL USE PEI NAMESE MAI CENTER ADDITION , I ■ 1 #Pln Plot Date: 9/21/18 Erik New_Vietnamese_Martyrs_Master_Plan_AC_21_pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 I ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION REVISED DRAWINGS co ui N oi I ■ I ■ 1 LUMINAIRE 4/2/18 A4.1 PLAN 49 50 YRIGHT © 10:30 AM ON Monday, October 15, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC OJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR ARRANGEMENT IN WIRTING CO NTS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OT THIS DOCUMENT REPRE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS 18.28.240 (item in italics pertain to shoreline jurisdiction) LANDSCAPING AT PERIMETER OF PARKING LOT • 5 Foot setback at perimeter of parking lot • 1 evergreen shrub per 4 linear feet of property line • Groundcover to cover 100% within 3 years (see planting details) • 1 tree every 20 lineal feet LANDSCAPING AT INTERIOR OF PARKING LOT • Lots adjacent to public streets require 20 SF of landscaping per stall • Lots located behind buildings or screened from streets/public spaces require 10 SF per stall • Landscaped islands must be minimum 6 Feet wide and 100 SF • Landscaped islands required at end of each parking row • 1 large -canopy tree or 2 medium -canopy trees per 100 SF of island, groundcover required • 10 SF of interior landscaping per 300 SF of paved surface • Landscaped Islands separated by no more than 150 Feet between islands Note: 1 parking stall equals approximately 162 SF (8.5x19) LANDSCAPE TOTAL AREAS (SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE FOR OTHERS): TOTAL AREA OF PAVING IN WORK AREAS: 95,974 SF TOTAL AREA OF ISLAND LANDSCAPING IN WORK AREAS: 4,447 SF A. TREES TO BE REMOVED IN SHORELINE AREA TREE SPECIES SIZE OF TREE TO BE REMOVED NO. OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED DECIDUOUS CHERRY DOUGLAS FIR DOUGLAS FIR CEDAR 6" 8" 18" 16" 24" 3 4 6 6 8 SUB -TOTAL 27 B. TREES TO BE REMOVED OUTSIDE SHORELINE AREA. TREE SPECIES SIZE OF TREE TO BE REMOVED NO. OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED CHERRY CHERRY CHERRY CHERRY CHERRY DECIDUOUS PINE 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" 10" 18" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUB -TOTAL 7 TOTAL NUMBER OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED : 34 NOTE: Replacement tree calculations based on Table 4 Tree Replacement Requirements SMP 9-10 C and the Tukwila Municipal Code 18.28.24 Tree Replacement TREE & VEGETATION PROTECTION TREE PROTECTION FENCING 1. MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OR GROUND DISTURBANCE 2. KEPT IN PLACE FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION 3. NO SOIL DISTURBANCE OR ACTIVITY ALLOWED WITHIN FENCED AREA, SUCH AS MATERIAL STORAGE/STOCKPILING, PARKING, EXCAVATION, DUMPING, OR WASHING 4. MODIFICATIONS OF THESE REQUIREMENTS BY APPROVAL OF DPD PLANNER ONLY 5. IF ROOTS GREATER THAN 2 INCH FOUND OUTSIDE OF FENCING, PROTECT BY HAND EXCAVATION AND, IF NECESSARY, CUT CLEANLY AND KEEP MOIST z 6. USE 3 INCHES OR DEEPER WOOD CHIP MULCH OUTSIDE FENCED AREAS TO `? PROTECT FEEDER ROOTS VEGETATION PROTECTION 1. MINIMIZE CONSTRUCTION ZONE 2. PROTECT VEGETATION OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION ZONE WITH FENCING AS SHOWN 3. USE 3 INCHES OR DEEPER WOOD CHIP MULCH OUTSIDE FENCED AREAS TO PROTECT FEEDER ROOTS CANOPY DRIP LINE DEFINES TREE & VEGETATION PROTECTION AREA ORANGE MESH OR CHAIN LINK FENCE TREE & VEGETATION FENCING AROUND ENTIRE DRIP LINE ON PERMIT SITE. ALTERNATIVE TREE PROTECTION, IF APPROVED BY DPD, AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN a —0 wI w= er CO Ce — oom 0 1—'w CO 0 0 :,i 13R 22 27 07 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE -corNcara :MILRas' 1,47AN'AY arks GRAINS 7NP PROP. LINE NO WORK CANOPY GREEN RIVER J NO WORK TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURE ;.N6 252PS LEARNING CENTER BUILDING OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BLDG SPERRY DRIVE (A PRIVATE STREET) EXISTING BUILDING REGION SYMBOL LANDSCAPE/ TREE TYPE ID QTYI# DESCRIPTION AREA REQ'D #IAREA PERIMETER �f 0 NEW EVERGREEN TREE PERIMETER EP # 21 FIR, CEDAR N/A 27 TREES EXSTG EVERGREEN TREE PERIMETER N/A 3 N/A N/A N/A NEW SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER PERIMETER N/A N/A DECIDUOUS & EVERGREEN 4,231.18 2,650 SF w c o cc ce 11, V, EXSTG DECIDUOUS TREE -ALONG SPERRY DRIVE N/A 5 N/A N/A N/A NEW SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER SPERRY DRIVE N/A N/A DECIDUOUS & EVERGREEN 1,618.33 1,260 SF BETWEEN LEARNING CENTER & CHURCH 0 NEW DECIDUOUS TREE - B/W LEARNING CENTER & CHURCH DL-# 38 MAPLE, CHERRY, FLOWERING PEAR, DOGWOOD N/A 19 TREES EXSTG EVERGRN TREE B/W LEARNING CTR & CHURCH N/A 2 N/A N/A N/A ISLAND B/W LEARNING CENTER & CHURCH N/A 19 DECIDUOUS & EVERGREEN 2,480.11 1,900 SF ®LANDSCAPE BETWEEN CHURCH & RIVER 0 NEW DECIDUOUS TREE - B/W CHURCH & RIVER DR-# 13 MAPLE, CHERRY, FLOWERING PEAR, DOGWOOD N/A 10 TREES ISLAND B/W CHURCH & RIVER N/A 13 DECIDUOUS & EVERGREEN 1,955.03 1,000 SF ®LANDSCAPE ADD'TL NEW LANDSCAPE 0 NEW EVERGREEN TREE ADDITIONAL EA-# 7 FIR, PINE, CEDAR N/A *MEETS PRMTR TREE REQ'T NEW SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER ADDITIONAL INTERIOR N/A N/A DECIDUOUS & EVERGREEN 6,198.40 ADDITIONAL TO REQ'TS ADD'TL EXSTG LANDSCAPE EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE N/A 21 N/A N/A N/A EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE N/A 7 N/A N/A N/A ADD'TL LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS PERVIOUS PAVING N/A N/A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS & PLAZAS ± 12,000 N/A LUMINAIRE - POLE LIGHT N/A 9 LIGHTING FOR PARKING LOT AND WALKWAYS NIA N/A TOP OF BANK ± (35) 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION ± (30.59) OHWM/TOE ± (8) SEE PLAN FOR LEVEE SETBACK LINES ACCESS FOR LE\ E MAINTENANCE 17PS 256 t 160' AISLE 21.0' VAN AISLE 20.5 PARKING STALL SCHEDULE STALL TYPE QUANTITY COMPACT COVERED 53 COMPACT SURFACE 88 EXISTING SURFACE 172 REGULAR COVERED 52 REGULAR SURFACE 121 TOTAL NUMBER OF STALLS 486 (172 EXISTING STALLS) ( 314 NEW STALLS) (141 COMPACT STALLS = 29% OF TOTAL) (15 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED) ( 370 STALLS REQUIRED. SEE: PARKING REQUIREMENTS MATRIX ON SHEETA4) ACCESS FOR LEVEE MAINTENANCE 110'-0" TYP ROW TYP ROW NOTE: FUTURE EASEMENT FOR LEVEE MAINTENANCE TO BE PROVIDED THIS AREA TOP OF STEEPLE 45'-0" TOP OF ROOF AISLE LEVEE PROTEN EASEMENT 001f_��-tt.,��. NO WORK Cc} IOR=TEN ON C.LL ELECTRIC CAR CHARGING (2 STALLS) OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BLDG BICYCLE PARKING (12 STALLS) PLANTING BED WITH ORNAMENTAL TREES STAMPED CONCRETE (RED BRICK ) TYPICAL IN FRONT OF CHURCH STATUARY OR FOUNTAIN WITH ROSE/FLOWER/HERB PLANTING BED TOE OF LE4JEE 7 P5 ICI CHURCH BUILDING C.L. OF CHURCH DOME PROPOSED CHURCH SEE PLAN FOR LEVEE SETBACK LINES PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW HYDRANT NO WORK PROPERTY LINE OHWM/TOE GREEN RIVER N� GREEN RIVER J EXISTING TR ES TO REMAIN EXTEtSIION TO 'AVER ACCES ROAD. •,CESS ROAD SkIALL BE N. 12'-0" WIDE \\ AD TR PER TIONALIEVERG PRO\' IDED T ETERTREE 9 LANDSCAPE PLAN A5 LANDWARD TOE = 40' ATTACHMENT A .851 MEET Q'MT SITE SECTION EAST -WEST = 40' TOP OF BANK ± (35) 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION ± (30.59) —OHWM/TOE ± (8) I ■ LEARNING CENTER ADDITION AND CHURCH EXPANSION 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 VIETNAMESE MARTYRS PARISI ■ 1 #PIn Plot Date: 10/15/18 Sean Hill New_Vietnamese_ Martyrs_ Master_Plan_AC_21.pIn BRODERICK ARCI NO. DATE DESCRIPTION REVISED DRAWINGS TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURES ADDED N � N ■ ■ 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 4/2/18 A5 51 52 LANDSCAPING RE U REMENTS 18,28,240 rnu t..7•1CS Pert rhrt tc ,4,4relint3)(4.54;mr,t343„ LANDSCAPING AT PERIN/1E1ER OF PARKING LO1 • S Foot setback at perimeter of parking lot • 1 rt!. cLer. shrub ftsr 4 Impor Foot cif pro pkEr IN in • Groundc c,& to co.,4;:l 100TE" smthin 2vears see pItti drstaTI, • 1 [Nre.5 every 14t: 0 r LANDSCAPING AT NTERR2R OF PARKING LOT • Lots adjacent to public streets require 20 SF of landscaping per stall • Lots located behind buildingsorscreened from streets/public spaces require 10 SF per stall • Lon,:ist:Lipso NI ndF,mit be mirru r.5 L ec VI t.1 F4 and 10t) 1.1 • Lintiscdpcql rslonliF requtred t"Jt ,and ot ;Rich p I-ong row • 1 largo camp.' trec. IF mudiurr canopy tree.. po 1.00 oF Lind, gruont-Nosso G.Limreri • .1(; iI t2,.n;erft„)(' NIS 444. .7 [7? per 300 Si, of p 054 et5: s U.r1.74 Cif' • r,C1 COp er7 ,41440-455 47t4407' t.r. V 00 More r it44,40 15o ; cr L.:tweet. 0075 in 1 par kiry stall equals tippr r„.X If 45,:itt,41., ("12 ,44‘ 191 LANDSCAPE TOTAL AREAS (SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE FOR OTHERS). TOTAL 'AREA OF PAVING IN 'WORK AREAS: 95,974 SF TOTAL AREA OF ISLAND LANDSCAPING IN WORK AREAS 4.447 SF A, TREES TO BE REMOVED IN SHORELINE AREA TREE SPECIES SIZE OF TREE 10 BE NO, OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED REMOVED 13 16' 14" 8, TREES TO BE REMOVED OUTSIDE I REE SPECIES CHERRY ":" L.R.i 12 11 5FERRy DEC:In:JOS PINts. 4 SUB -TOTAL 25 °RELINE AREA. SIZE OF TREE TO BE REMOVED `f 2' 16' 13 NO OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED SUS -TOTAL 7 TOTAL NUMBER OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED: 32 N i'3'444t444,5444f54.35it N144.. 1.i13J.11411444 S44-4 5 5 Table 4 Tree Replacement Requirements SfitP 1.10 C 31.11. Municipal Cede 18,25.24 Tree Replacement REE & VEGETATION PROTECTION R PRO inN N C I t4, N,TuST. EEL IN.STALLE L3 PRIOR 413 12EV41,411KI12 012 Lt3,03 iS E4444,if.41L7 2 EP iN 13i1212E4 13513 741E 12JR;4,7012 124 111242111312 3 NO 12.13.:01.33.1L131211212E OH A (7 70,,, " ALLOWED Wi THIN FP NCLI4 45411r ,St), A S $44.,'/ERTA,..S ELVA:, LEECR15I5P :444 cd N E ION VE'i "'SR 0130TI tF•G $ MORO' ICA", ONNS OE STE SIT RLF.DI_NREENT pp 130 7,444L OF 121213 .11,4 1213r4‘ (31213 5 if ROO'S 3P,i."4„TE4t 13513122 12121212211 00 7/. IDE.: '„NF r E N PR 'Er E " HAN FT Ex:0104"A' ION ANr11NE's': LS SA 0'01 *..4...E412111,YNt.134 i3ELP N4'13151 6 1.434.11 INCHES OR L4PF ,E4' 1.117.r3 11121212(2 SCE: 41) 41,;`„E„..N,F, 0 PRC F E4LR ROO'S Vi333,,E7703r3.NN 13071123}.0N,! %,NINi4411L31,4 r„'„1N'.344'44431'33. (211312 21.413 2 1212013121311212(311330101211)1141213111131212 C, zr--„N vvr„, FLINEERNG/\S SMON4E+54 00- 3 4,i0,31S Cf3EpE t44 '1200 oho, t.s4„4,3t1. 115421311212.111351121213513) 1214ERE.N.,7 ELLEDER ROTS 1.551g0.35 LIFO' ELT' NES 3F4E313 VE, GI 7.7,7 7N ORO re,: 310 N' Ain't' L14 i "„, „ 'It aPsINEN..E. 11312 HAN Loo, 012114(23 _ s 13111211203121251'4012 LNEIRE L'ERIP LINE. ;INN Srf: 44 L. 44 e.T=', i,74C,4fi TR EL PR:011"."1",)N TLPRRENRIEEl BY DPEI, 44.1 i**47,V,1,1 1312 SI ; PEDESTRIAN ACCESS NOT PROPOSED AT THIS LOCATION LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE REGION1 SYMBOL ';x: -t1 te 4, r Ktsagii,kft' Aaxtutv* 13 1211241241251 „,,4" 12 '...34REEN 12M:43 - 0.4,4•0.5""" ...4444 „,,,544,435 74'4, ,PEDIFENTRANi4k&E,'SS TT; TAN 47. NTT AkEERK 44" LEAR BUIL e*, PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO SHORELINE TRAIL LANDSCAPE,' TREE TYPE NE.04 LEVER REL N11 REF-. EH /1' "S" 1 13411 4121243113 1212 „"3 "REEL' uLRINE LE PROPOSED SIGN TO SHORELINE TRAIL D I Y4' DESCRIPTION 1l4.e 51t-Lc 'ER 51, 113121112 DR KE PR IN/AT E SF iR.F.„1, * 11 HETI D ,AR EA EALR EVERGRLTSN REF., N A ;417. E NEP/ 350113LES INFL'SOV ER N IN A 01:4"Z 556'4311303 12.1.10140 Ku\ ST'Efti." DRIVE ra SfiR,„..16„i,3, 3s' (34;4'44)414-04.7,,'.),4ic,„7 N,A N EFPFERRN" 0,13.1 5430 LE.ARNH3 0144iN E4 E,S3(4,31:-644N 35454 LE4V44NiNC, 1,43-t' CHUP04-i N D SCA; E Si.14 NO L34 01 1 .44 LLARNINS; E."" 01-fthei4,344 4.4500 D4441111irws (4,,f1;3. 41131 .„tii..h4,„rt „!.t. Rivf,444 iSLANit„; 6.125 "ELI LJR,C. RIVER NEAN' T 5ER 14.44;EL 7 4**34121211., 4413'12 013t.114003.245E45' 044 LC DUOL.4, 12 1212121241110(243 N4„'N 12411102120121212 E.' 43ER ',...44'3214 531 4. 1.1.3d ‘`,3i' 4 L.43 419 2 13 MAt,' 012E21112L'aVie't R I t‘.3 N 12 "„): EN 'SO; ENS):.) ',"4 'REES Ne4'3 N 'A 443 1 11.113'1.:IDUCIS12731512 .4' 41 ERR?, JOE P.I6 N'd A 44e435(211 PEAR (3513(11(20(23.4 L. V.3 iit3141L-E5Ni 13122., 1 137.0 :Sr 1,,9EE' ZFLR,N,' 7 R L1,; T ; RE3C/i ` !\l'A 4) ‘4117.1.0. 7 !"4 E.< FS' 7 NCI. 0312412iU0J12 13335 4343 212N4A 'ERIS; 13F",444112E134 41144141 F„,„,A : L012 ITERVI DLLs 1212131241 ..„'5100144141:, .31.451. Of 'DARR s, S:- 13 t 440,31LX *t PEDE12312iAN P7. \50,vtS ELRERS sIGH IN 13 P.J.Ndi1%Li - &. I *..4J 4,.44.„) 3'2,4 el 04 133 ,1312 1212 /...13 41% 54.44.B177' 110),1!\ME SETLN,ING,,IN1111 F5S. FOR tiNJ4-413i3111414.:1T 0,1110'4; ' 4140, ataift4f, $14WAN. 4*4 ' 1.414 'A TT .544.114,1* „g4,5,V„," 145.451 *SC „5 44,54. 115,104* 41.0447,' "Vidtalitivir PROPOSED SIGN SIGN TO SHORELINE TRAIL 4'35.16. 1 i5434 3133.13' 4443,44 STA-E, 345 12541321 3444.3131 Lc' 737,40, ' ',I 10/S :131/4...43'341,543.34411:3 0.313131312. 13E12 3212 444444 154'14' 14 4,4435LL.4.1144 r34 33,10 ,43 .35 '34-4.43 I 144 1112 4\ 3311ESS FOR „Ev; '121 31,4"5 %IAN' EN4AN*3 " ms" 004 453 " Mr' 331 3TEE'c'„ TKa 111\e-5,5 44 /77 .4 44 43 713, 1321133 41513ENIEN4T / 4„0,4 f" '151, N.11 t144 77 51,*,,,,r,E 44 73 3313 z''';',..f..3.40; 13 245 ! ARC", 133: -1r e**,L.':',1" LEVEL PRCFIES`FON EASEMENT NO, 20TOTAXMOTI 13) 940 5112(2-4 47. se,45,iNitc,555.*ITTIANT. NNI,M30",M.11"trNs*“„ 13321 rq ELLARONST E 74'400 ,S" 47," Esr ,ERRRETSFEEI 140,',X4 BIS; ITAPKINS4* E5,132 44131$2I120 RED RNAME41 41113. TRE.EE 12141.414' 03.1113ACTE 4E31241351, .N4 7 5Z 0747 331 TA 44 „ „ „, ‘'',1t7 4i re40',3;" 43. 00044 '4: '4,2 1313413112.34 (1311) TA: 047 REVErcHR, i":3S" EITLEN .43t.TRES I /33-- RNer., .f.4 14143121 NG 44)BY, „414,44,0444 4..04 41" 430221044/..,'EvERc..S13EN P13012401171 10 WEI Pt:RIME:TEA E (-1' EXHIBIT 'D' - 10/11/18 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 4.4744 '64;4, 0 Ccr ATTACHMENT A TE SECTION EAST -WEST ,T 'ET" FER,Ns NEE %OA 1-1212 .41 206.682 .7525 LANDSCAPE PLAN 4/2/18 A5 1-410154E, Ji13N3S014.4. 4012 513124..AN CR .3'4:E 512211144:1401241111 7 .4445V4` 4,Zi.N1 E 44, t."44,344.5tr%„3, E LERFORIE"..15,1L „Aff"..",,,t,tt'SSF,ElN ""SEE TsAN PER L'/FEE EL TBAS;F.,.,'45$ 53 54 IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT 2:15 PM ON Friday, September 21, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, ITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OTHER PROJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR AR NTS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE A THIS DOCUMEN ENTRANCE OUR LADY OF LAVANG STATUE Q Oo 0 19'-0" 25'-0" OUTDOOR STAGE EXIT #21 EXIT #31 19'-Orr 16-0" —J 25'-0" v 16-0" TYP. ROW co }o VAN UP EXIT #1 STORAGE RAMP UP 25 SPACES AISLE 8 TYP. ROW TYP. ROW co ct >a:.- v AISLE TYP. ROW 11 STOR'S MECH. LO 7 GARAGE 104 SPA :ES CHURCH EXPANSION - GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1/1 6" = 1 '-0" 0 iJ V e1ev. RESTRM. RESTRM. V STOWS AUDITORIUM / MULTIPURPOS 4.4 CAFETERIA SERVING KITCHEN STOR'S 1 STOR'S MAINT. 2 illPHASE PHASE 3 EXISTING WALLS .. ..r - NEW WALLS *--C`, PATH OF EGRESS 0 T STAGE FLEX CLASS RM. 30 1 EXIT #51 CARPORT/ OUTDOOR COOKING COVER AREA EXIT #61 TRUCK LOADING ZONE BIFOLDING PARTITION CIEGIECEC FLEX CLASS RM. 31 CESTIIIECIO 1 EXIT #41 i ATTACHMENT B BUILDING AREAS Zone Number Zone Name Area 101 COVERED PARKING 29,077.43 102 STORAGE 5,347.06 103 CAFETERIA AND KITCHEN 9,199.52 104 AUDITORIUM / MULTIPURPOSE 18,131.66 201 OFFICES (CHURCH ASSOCIATED) 10,197.51 202 CLASSROOMS 564.00 203 CLASSROOMS 2,984.67 204 CHURCH AND CHAPEL 19,326.65 94,828.50 sq ft 4532 REGISTERED ARCHITECT KEVIN J. BRODERICK STATE OF WASHINGTON I ■ 1 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 )NDITIONAL USE PEI NAMESE MAI CENTER ADDITION , 1 ■ 1 #Pln Plot Date: 9/21/18 Erik New_Vietnamese_ Martyrs_ Master_ Plan_ AC_21 pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 I ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION REVISED DRAWINGS N ■ I ■ 1 CHURCH EXPANSION - GROUND FLOOR PLAN 4/2/18 A7 55 56 NT IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT ©10:09 AM ON Monday, April 2, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC JECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR ARRANGE OJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS P TS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OT 0 EXIT #1 DOWN RAMP DN. EXIT #9 ENTRANCE RAMP DN CLASS RM. 7 BALCON CONE ROOM BALCON NARTHEX RECON RECONC RECONC PARISH ADMIN. OFFICE VESTMENT ROOF OVER STAGE rn LLIJILLIULLJ CLASS RM, 2 CLASS RM. 3 OFFICE 2 RESTRM. OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE 3 OFFICE WORK AREA OFFICE OFFICE 4 CLASS RM. 4 EDMOrinal OFFICE 5 RESTRM. CLASS RM. 32 CRYROOM OFFICE 6 1' 1 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1'11111111 j,,,u JJLlLIII 1111 CLASS RM. 5 EIEDIDEIDECD OFFICE 7 EXIT #2 1, 1, i 1 1 I, 1 1 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,11111111 CHAPEL (SEATED 160) POALTAR❑ 1,s1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11„1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111110 b. d NAVE a CHURCH EXPANSION - SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1 '-0" 1 283 283 1232 11.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 n'1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 l I 1 I 1 1 b 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 81 0 CHOIR 1 1,=1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1s1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SACRIST EXIT #8 RAISED ROOF EXISTING ROOF PHASE 2 ALL WALLS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION EXISTING ROOF ATTACHMENT B BUILDING AREAS Zone Number Zone Name Area 101 COVERED PARKING 29,077.43 102 STORAGE 5,347.06 103 CAFETERIA AND KITCHEN 9,199.52 104 AUDITORIUM / MULTIPURPOSE 18,131.66 201 OFFICES (CHURCH ASSOCIATED) 10,197.51 202 CLASSROOMS 564.00 203 CLASSROOMS 2,984.67 204 CHURCH AND CHAPEL 19,326.65 94,828.50 sq ft Q t/ ^IJ ,1..1J V Z CY uj WF wZ to S O = U OU te z0 W N ///4���— W Q IM� �F I ■ I 7 c J L. J J D _17 ) ) ) 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 NAMESE MAI CENTER ADDITION , I is #Pln Plot Date: 4/2/18 Sean Hill New_Vietnamese_Martyrs_Master _Plan_AC_21.pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 I ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION I ■ I ■ 1 CHURCH EXPANSION - SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4/2/18 A8 L 57 58 NT IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT ©10:08 AM ON Monday, April 2, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC JECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR ARRANGE OJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS P TS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OT +17'-0„ TOP OF PARAPET COVERED WALKWAY +0„ GROUND FLOOR COMPOSITE TILE ROOF, TYP. COMPOSITE WINDOW TRIM, TYP. +17'-0" TOP OF PARAPET STUCCO CAST STONE WATERTABLE W/ PRECAST CAP ±0" GROUND FLOOR 4 EXISTING TILT -UP WALLS EXISTING MASONRY WALLS Blplllmim0W, NEW WINDOWS IN EXISTING MASONRY (TYPICAL THIS WALL) MASONRY ROWLOCK SILL, TYP. NEW GROUND FLOOR ON NEW FOUNDATION STOREFRONT WINDOWS AND DOORS NORTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED 1/16" = 1 '-0" TRUK TAM G140 O C 60C TIN 1,11 not NEW GROUND FLOOR ON NEW FOUNDATION EXISTING TILT -UP WALLS 37'-8" CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM N EXIT #2 5 SOUTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED 1/16" = 1 '-0" CLASSROOM CLASSROOM 711 SF 35 OCC: EXISTING MASONRY STRUCTURE (TYP.) CLASSROOM CLASSROOM EXIT #1 DROP-OFF ZONE r J SSROOM 155'-0" 114'4" ,, 6'-10" CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM 799 SF 39 OCC CLASSROOM 18 861 SF 40 OCC .ING HT=+/-13'-0" (EXISTING) CLASSROOM CLASSROOM EXISTING TILT -UP CONCRETE WALLS (TYP,) NEW WINDOWS AT TILT -UP WALLS NEW CONTINUOUS WATER TABLE, TYPICAL MECH. ROOM EXIT #3 ©ININ ROO NEW SHEAR WALL 4 REQUIRED LEARNING CENTER - GROUND FLOOR PLAN A6 1/16" = 1 '-0" 33'-10" STORAGE KITCHEN PHASE 1 © EXISTING WALLS NEW WALLS Nal > PATH OF EGRESS 911 +1 T-0" TOP OF PARAPET COMPOSITE TILE ROOF COMPOSITE TILE ROOF STUCCO COMPOSITE WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL CAST STONE WATERTABLE W/ PRECAST CAP NEW COMPOSITE TILE ROOF AT EXISTING TILT -UP WALLS EXISTING COVERED WALKWAY APOk TRANSFORMER PAD EXIT #4 CONCRETE PAD FOR CHILLER EXIT #5 lii co co +0„ GROUND FLOOR +1 T-0" TOP OF PARAPET ±0" GROUND FLOOR STUCCO PAINTED FIBERGLASS COLUMN CAST STONE BASE W/ PRECAST CAP NEW ENTRY BEYOND 4 STUCCO NEW COMPOSITE TILE ROOF AT EXISTING TILT -UP WALLS EXISTING TILT -UP WALLS EXISTING COVERED ENTRY 4 EAST ELEVATION - PROPOSED 1/16" = 1 '-0" NEW GROUND FLOOR ON NEW FOUNDATION COMPOSITE TRIM AT WINDOWS, TYPICAL NEW ENTRY BEYOND WEST ELEVATION - PROPOSED 1/16" = 1 '-0" COMPOSITE TILE ROOF STUCCO PAINTED FIBERGLASS COLUMN CAST STONE BASE W/ PRECAST CAP ATTACHMENT B BUILDING AREAS Zone Number Zone Name Calculated Area 101 RELIGIOUS CLASSROOMS 18,258.28 102 AUDITORIUM, CAFETERIA & KITCHEN 6,006.14 24,264.42 sq ft Q 5 Z CeLU W U� WF 2Z yS OS U O v) Ct CO LL W C) WQ o I ■ 7 L. 7 L. -1r) D _17 7 ) 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 NAMESE MAI CENTER ADDITION , 1 ■ 1 #Pln Plot Date: 4/2/18 Sean Hill New_Vietnamese_Martyrs_Master _Plan_AC_21.pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 1 ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 ■ 1 ■ 1 LEARNING CENTER PLAN AND ELEVATIONS 4/2/18 A6 L 59 60 NT IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT ©10:09 AM ON Monday, April 2, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC JECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR ARRANGE OJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS P TS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OT NORTH ELEVATION 1 /16" = 1 ' -0" WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0" SANCTUARY CROSS 100'-0" AFF TOP OF STEEPLE 95'-0" AFF TOP OF ROOF RIBBED METAL ROOF RESIN STATUES COMPOSITE TILE ROOF STEEPLE CROSS _ 115'-0" AFF TOP OF STEEPLE 10'-0" AFF TOP OF ROOF 45'-0" AFF ATTACHMENT B Q ^., O Z CeUJ W U� WF 2Z 02 02 U 0 U) C e CO LL W N W Q 1 ■ 7 L. —1L. -1r) D _17 7 ) 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 NAMESE MAI CENTER ADDITION , 1 ■ 1 #Pln Plot Date: 4/2/18 Sean Hill New_Vietnamese_Martyrs_Master _Plan_AC_21.pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 1 ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 ■ 1 . 1 CHURCH EXPANSION - ELEVATIONS 4/2/18 A9 L 61 62 NT IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT ©10:09 AM ON Monday, April 2, 2018 BY BRODERICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC OJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY PRIOR ARRANGE TS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OT STEEPLE CROSS 115'-0'AFF TOP OF STEEPLE 110'-0"AFF TOP F ROOF 45'-0'AFF 2ND FLOOR 9'-6" AFF 1ST FLOOR SOUTH ELEVATION Al 0 1/16" = 1'-0" EAST E L EVAT I O N 1 /1 6" = 1 '-0" SANCTUARY CROSS 100'-0" AFF TOP OF STEEPLE '^ 95'-0" AFF TOP OF ROOF 45'-0" AFF LMS'L a'-.s', ai�tJy, �t4`ts'ttar�{ea'pFtx-��da .t3p�}iisrb5sSx �r4 RIBBED METAL ROOF STUCCO COMPOSITE TILE ROOF RESIN STATUES CAST STONE WATERTABLE CONCRETE STEPS ATTACHMENT B L..7 W r) 4532 REGISTERED ARCHITECT KEVIN J. BRODERICK STATE OF WASHINGTON I ■ 7 c I- I- D _17 ) ) ) 6801 S. 180TH STREET • TU KWI LA, WA 98188 NAMESE MAI CENTER ADDITION , 1 ■ 1 #Pln Plot Date: 4/2/18 Sean Hill New_Vietnamese_ Martyrs Master Plan_ AC_21.pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 1 ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 ■ 1 . 1 CHURCH EXPANSION ELEVATIONS 4/2/18 A1O - L 63 64 TUKWILA BEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Applicant: File Number: Application:. Owner: Location: SEPA Determination: Comprehensive Plan/ Zoning Designation: Recommendation: Public Hearing: Church of the Vietnamese Martyrs L 13-007 (Conditional Use Permit) The application is for conditional use approval . for a religious facility in an existing manufacturing building in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) zone Church of the Vietnamese Martyrs 6801 South 180th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Exempt Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) The Development of Community Development recommends approval with conditions. The Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the application on May 8, 2013, at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite • 100, Tukwila, WA. The Examiner viewed the site on May 5, 2013. EXHIBITS: The following exhibits were entered into the record: 1. Department's staff report with Attachments A-C Attachment A: Project description and applicant's response Attachment B:. Project plans Attachment C: Seating plan 2. Department powerpoint presentation Introduction The applicant seeks a conditional use permit to allow a religious facility with an assembly area greater than 750 square feet within the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) zone. A public hearing was held on the application on May 8, 2013, at the Department of Community 65 Hearing Examiner Decision - L13-007 Church of the Vietnamese Martyrs CUP Page 2 of 5 Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. Represented at the hearing were: the Department, by Courtney Johnson, Planning Intern, and Minnie Dhaliwal, Senior Planner, and the applicant, Church of the Vietnamese Martyrs, by Kien Nguyen and Kevin Broderick, project architect. No one from the general public testified at the hearing. After due consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, the following shall constitute the findings of fact, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner on this application. Findings of Fact 1. The subject site is addressed as 6801 South 180th Street, Tukwila, WA. The site is a 5.77 acre parcel that is developed with a 62,250 square warehouse and manufacturing structure, which is currently vacant. The site contains approximately 241 parking spaces. 2. The site takes access via Sperry Drive which connects to S. 180th Street, with freeway access nearby. The site is surrounded by a mix of commercial uses, including office and retail uses, including several adjacent bank properties, and Westfield Shopping Mall is five blacks away. The Green River Trail surrounds the building. The site is relatively flat, and is landscaped with trees, shrubs and groundcover. 3. The site is zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC), as is the surrounding area. 4. The proposal is to convert the existing building to a religious facility with interior remodeling as shown in the plans in the record. The proposed worship area of the church would be 8000 square feet, with seating area which is the equivalent of 733 seats. Classroom and office spaces are also proposed. Several spaces exceeding 750 square feet within the building are classified as assembly areas under the City's Codes. No exterior changes, other than signage and fencing, are proposed. The applicant notes that classroom and worship spaces would never be in use at the same time. The facility would be in use during the evenings and weekends, and there may be 1-2 special events a year. 5. Under TMC 18.56.050, a total of 183 parking stalls and 7 bicycle spaces are required. 6. The Department has reviewed the proposal and recommends approval with conditions. The Department has noted that in addition to the conditions of CUP approval, the applicant will be required to meet all applicable building and fire codes as part of the building permit review. 66 Hearing Examiner Decision L13-007 Church of the Vietnamese Martyrs Page 3 of 5 Conclusions 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this application pursuant to TMC 18.104.010.3, which provides that a decision on a conditional use permit application is a quasi-judicial decision by the Hearing Examiner. 2. - The proposed religious facility's assembly areas would exceed 750 square feet, so conditional use approval is required under TMC 18.26.020. 3. The criteria for granting of a conditional use permit are set forth in TMC 18.64.050: (1) the proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity; (2) the proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy; (3) the proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design; (4) the proposed development shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan; and (5) all measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. 4. The proposed use would not be materially detrimental to public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in vicinity. The applicant will utilize the existing building and only minor exterior changes are proposed. The use will occur primarily on weekends and evenings, and poses no conflicts with existing uses in the vicinity. 5. The proposal as conditioned would meet applicable development standards, including those for onsite parking, and standards addressing air quality, noise, water quality, and hazardous materials. Building and fire code standards will also be met as part of the building permit review for the proposal. The Department's proposed conditions also require a shared parking or covenant parking agreement with adjacent bank properties, if parking demand is not met on the site, and a parking management program for special events at the site. 6. Only minor changes to the site are proposed, i.e., signage and a fence, and the proposed fence will be placed on the interior side of the landscaping. The site enjoys good access to the freeways, S. 180th Street, and the Green River Trail. Much of the activity at the religious facility will occur during weekends and evenings, when some of the surrounding uses are not active. The proposed development would therefore be compatible with surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, and building and site design. 7. The proposed religious facility would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, including Goals 10.1 and 10.2, and Policy 10.2.6. The TUC zone is intended to contain a 67 Hearing Examiner Decision L13-007 Church of the Vietnamese Martyrs CUP Page 4 of 5 diverse mix of uses, including residential and commercial uses; the proposed religious facility will help to diversify the uses in the zone. 8. As conditioned, the proposal will incorporate all appropriate measures to minimize possible adverse impacts. No adverse impacts have been identified but if the congregation increases in size, additional parking demand could be created. The applicant has indicated that it would seek parking covenants with the adjacent bank properties if the need arose. The Department's recommendations include conditions regarding parking agreements and parking management to address possible impacts from parking demand. 9. The application would meet all criteria for a conditional use permit and should be approved Decision The Conditional Use Permit is hereby granted with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and recording a Shared or Covenant Parking Agreement between the subject property and the adjoining properties if either: the seating is expanded such that the site does not meet the requirement of one parking space per four seats, or if the parking demand cannot be met on the property and there are off -site parking impacts as determined by the Department. The language of the Shared or Covenant Parking Agreement shall be approved by the City and shall be consistent with TMC 18.56.070. 2. The applicant shall adopt a Parking Management Program for special events that shall include the following: a) Information and education: Educate the congregation families to encourage them to carpool, use transit, bike, or walk to the church. b) Demand Reduction Strategies: Establish a preferred parking area for families and groups that carpool with four or more persons per car; c) Demand Management Strategies: Implement measures to ensure that sufficient parking is available. These measures could include agreements with the surrounding businesses; shuttles; establishing a team of parking attendants to help direct drivers to available parking locations. Entered this 15th day of May, 2013. Anne Watanabe Hearing Examiner 68 Hearing Examiner Decision L13-007 Church of the Vietnamese Martyrs Page 5 of 5 Concerning Further Review TMC 18.108.030 provides that "The decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be final and sha1l be appealable only to Superior Court pursuant to RCW 36.70C." 69 70 RE TIE 1 CRITERLI The review criteria for various types of projects are shown below. Please discuss development consistency with each criteria. Then, refer to the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan for project consistency with the policies. Please note that more than one category of policies may apply. Criteria for Conditional Uses (TMC 18.64.030) 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The project will improve the appearance of the existing church building, increase the number of trees on the site and will improve parking and vehicle circulation. The conversion and renovation of the former Wells Fargo building to a learning center for young parishioners will not only support educational needs of the congregation but activate a currently vacant building. The proposed project will not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the area. 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy. The project exceeds parking requirements as defined by TMC Figure 18-7 and landscaping as required by TMC 18.28.240 and Table 4. Tree Replacement Requirements of the Shoreline Master Program. As discussed during the pre -application meeting, landscaping will also be implemented in accordance with corridor standards to the extent feasible in conjunction with the timing of related city improvements along S. 180th Street. 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses. The majority of the site has been used by the Vietnamese Martyrs Parish for many years for church related activities. The new acquisition of the Wells Fargo building on an adjacent property and its conversion to the new Learning Center will make it compatible with the existing church property. While the area is mostly industrial and commercial in character, it is also diverse with the nearby location of an extended stay hotel. The site is also bound by the Green River on three of its sides. 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. The new landscaping at the site will benefit and enhance the Green River trail, which runs along three sides. This will encourage "a pedestrian oriented environment" and "enhance the open space network". The proposed project will allow the church to carefully expand . This growth will make the area more diverse as well as culturally and economically robust. 5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. Replanting of trees will occur in accordance with all applicable codes (TMC 18.28.24, SMP 9-10C) and new native shrubs and groundcovers will be included in the landscape plan. Surface water control design will be done in accordance with the City of Tukwila development standards of King County Water Design Manual. Surface water will be controlled by an on site infiltration system. Architectural design will be reviewed by Design Review with Public Hearing. \\citystore \City Common\ Teri - DCD \Kirby \2016 Applications \Conditional Use Permit -March 2016.docx 71 72 September 25, 201 8 City of Tukwila — Department of Community Development Attn: Lindsay Brown 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Attendance Report Address: 6801 S. 180th Street (formerly 6841 & 6847 S. 180th Street) Reference #: PL18-0020 Project Name: Vietnamese Martyrs Expansion The following attendance report has been provided by a representative of the Parish: ACTIVITIES DATE Weekday Satu rday Su viday Daily Mass (IV- F) 11:CO AIM \\. ReligiousEducation 0: 1A, '..n - 300 PM Religious Education ' Weekend Mass 600 PM Vigil Mass 400JILUIIIIII roo 7:ao ,6k .• . und ay .05.5 \\\\\ e!.:,<, 9:30AM Sunday Mass , .t \ 1200 11:30 AM Sunday , lass ,,,• • • .\I::1:,\ .A.‘,NIViiik• •," \. 700 5:00 MI Sunday J i 55 \\:, ,,, '''' \ .,,N, 300 **Summer: Last week of ay through 3rd week in September: No Religious Education & 20% attendance reduction 73 74 E ICI< C ITECTS September 25, 2018 City of Tukwila — Department of Community Development Attn: Lindsay Brown 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Traffic Management Plan Address: 6801 S. 180th Street (formerly 6841 & 6847 S. 180th Street) Reference #: PL18-0020 Project Name: Vietnamese Martyrs Expansion The existing maximum number of occupants is 1,200 based on the attendance report for the 9:30 AM Sunday Mass. 300 parking stalls are required for this number of fixed seats according to TMC Figure 18- 7. There are currently 257 existing parking stalls on site and overflow parking is provided at parking areas A and B (see overflow parking map), where there are approximately a total of 139 additional parking stalls. Parking area A is street parking which is available Saturdays and Sundays. Parking stalls on site and at parking areas A and B total approximately 396 stalls. The proposed Church Expansion and Learning Center Addition would increase the number of required parking stalls to 370. Additional parking stalls are also required for special events such as the annual summer festival which occurs in August. In order to accommodate special events, the parish has reached an agreement with Oaksdales.1, LLC for the use of parking area C, the parking lot at IDC Medical Plaza. According to the agreement, there are 220 parking stalls in area C which are available for visitors of the church to use on weekends and holidays. Parking areas A and B are within a short walk of the site. Parking area C is still walkable but shuttle transportation is provided for most visitors by the 3 vans and 2 buses belonging to the parish. These vehicles seat a total of 102 people. The total number of proposed parking stalls would be the following: On Site: 490 Area A: 39 Area B: 100 Area C: 220 Total: 849 Stalls Please see the attached Overflow Parking Map and Parking Areas. 75 76 LEGEND: GENERAL NOTES: OVERFLOW PARKING AREA PER TUKWILA MUNICIPLE CODE (TMC) NO PARKING IS ALLOWED ‘•••••••••— vist„ ts, OVERFLOW PARKING AREA 'B': 39 PARKING SPACES •Nt• ttO Ver. 144,1 ,,,s444404ZVV1404:441:4V 4 44 4* 414414444 4444414t4 44 14 '1 ck14 ,4044144044.41N44 „ Mt: • '` Awkrix44). "44444%44444,WA, OVERFLOW PARKING MAP 300 ' Ann naktAkknAzyq0,4'10‘,•••n. . In.•,4nt '" 4 ,' N4444, J `,1*,- ,*•,•,,l‘ti,•„.„1,,'.. , AAAAAAA(,n„ 4,4 OVERFLOW PARKING AREA 'A': 100 ON -STREET PARKING SPACES 44f. o: 4 Woe P404041, 7 Zflitr4T*4444ft ••••4, \ A • • , #1*ST1 Fi SIREETI, ,‘ 444 4 144 s stt 94A44 41•„447; kr.4104 „ • 4 v •Ltne4,404VVVVV • T,404, 4,4 4•1„'"•„'0.„;41a4triA tit V V sv PEDESTRIAN ROUTE FROM PARKING 1 IN FRONT OF A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE DRIVEWAY WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE END OF THE RADIUS LEADING THERETO. 2 IN ANY PLACE WHERE OFFICIAL SIGNS PROHIBIT PARKING (CASCADE, RIVERSIDE, AND OLYMPIC ALLOW PARKING IN NO PARKINGZONES ON WEEKENDS). PHOTO REFERENCE KEY (SEE ATTACHED) 3 WITHIN 15 FEET OF FIRE HYDRANTS. 1", • 11‘44$@•44,,,,,,ak*,, „ „ 1.7 7 144„Ve5VVV4 444,4440'4 4-04C4 "Vq`49,1:MV tkt • , "WV*, -*4 444 OVERFLOW PARKIN AREA 'C': 220 PARKING SPACE .14 44,4444414„, y. 4441ii'; *•• , tt„ t 4 4'^' ttNAVVVVV, 1V1 vf4r4V4V4v VVIV tt4 UVIVIVI441 VV." k?"' '1•4t4t4t Itt,Z4V1f44:144 Aaktitt144 * '1 t , i4z• A'' „ k40,:4..*44 ,. \WO,' V, ,‘ 'NtAVV`W,A4Aten \ ,;`0*1,A;liOfPkAtt• 4,,4•804, .• :, ; a ,p,„,,T •„„•mt` , , S‘,11:1 i,,,i in 4 „ "J ,e, . , s; ' 14,4 N ' p _ 1,11. , ' ;,. .1. M4 1 kt,t,,,, , ,, V, VV. ta tt • 04 444 ‘4044#4 444'44 7,••••••, :44 EARNING CENTER ADDITION AND CHURCH EXPANSION co co cs) • LLJ 0 1/4 0 00 Lu ERICK ARCH 0 206.682.7525 0 0 OVERFLOW PARKING MAP 77 78 PARKING AREAS & SHUTTLES TYPICAL OVERFLOW PARKING AREA 'A' CURB CONDITIONS 100 PARKING SPACES CASCADE AVENUE S: SATURDAY & SUNDAY PARKING IS ALLOWED ON ALL OF CASCADE AVENUE S WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (OUTLINED ON THE OVERFLOW PARKING PLAN). RIVERSIDE DRIVE: SATURDAY & SUNDAY PARKING IS ALLOWED ON ALL OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (OUTLINED ON THE OVERFLOW PARKING PLAN). 7 OLYMPIC AVENUE S: SATURDAY & SUNDAY PARKING IS ALLOWED ON ALL OF OLYMPIC AVENUE S WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (OUTLINED ON THE OVERFLOW PARKING PLAN). 10 1 12 79 PARKING AREAS & SHUTTLES TYPICAL OVERFLOW PARKING AREA'B' LOT CONDITIONS 39 PARKING SPACES 180TH STREET LOT: THIS LOT IS OPPOSITE THE SITE ON 180TH STREET AND IS OVERFLOW PARKING FOR THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES AND GREEN RIVER TRAIL ACCESS. EXISTING ANGLE PARKING PROVIDES AN ADDITIONAL 39 STALLS. 3 14. 80 PARKING AREAS & SHUTTLES TYPICAL OVERFLOW PARKING AREA 'C' LOT CONDITIONS 220 PARKING SPACES IDC MEDICAL PLAZA: EXISTING PARKING LOT EAST OF SITE USED FOR MEDICAL PLAZA. CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH PROPERTY OWNERS FOR 220 APPROVED SPACES AVAILABLE FOR USE ON SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS, HOLIDAYS AND SPECIAL EVENTS. 81 PARKING AREAS & SHUTTLES SHUTTLE VEHICLES AVAILABLE 3 VANS, 2 BUSES -102 PASSENGERS VANS: 3 VANS AVAILABLE THAT WILL SEAT 14 PASSENGERS (INCLUDING DRIVER) EACH. PHOTO SHOWS 2 OF THE 3 VANS, TYPICAL MAKE AND MODEL. BUSSES: 2 BUSES AVAILABLE THAT WILL SEAT 60 PASSENGERS (BUS 1 = 36 SEATS, BUS 2 = 24 SEATS) TOTAL. PHOTO SHOWS THE 2 BUSES, TYPICAL MAKE AND MODEL. February 21, 2018 Vietnamese Martyrs Parish: Learning Center Addition and Church Expansion Design Review — Project Consistency with Decision Criteria The Vietnamese Martyrs Parish in Tukwila is applying for Design Review Approval for landscaping, parking lot reconfiguration and for the renovation of two existing buildings on the site. The Learning Center would be the first building to be renovated and features the conversion of, and addition to, a former Wells Fargo bank building to become an educational facility for religious and cultural education. The existing church building would be the second building to be renovated and would feature partial demolition and the addition of a second floor over part of the building. It is important for the congregation that the Learning Center be completed first. This way, educational programs that are currently operating in the church building could be relocated, before renovation work begins at the church building. The renovation to the existing church building is an opportunity to reconfigure the building so that it functions better and better suites the needs of the congregation in regards to administrative offices, meeting spaces and a place of worship. Equally important for the congregation is the transformation of the existing industrial type building into a new building that resonates as a symbol of their faith. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE The parking lot has been redesigned to accommodate more cars while improving pedestrian and vehicular circulation. New shrubs and ground cover and the planting of 64 trees is proposed to "moderate the visual impact" of the parking area from the Green River Trail and S. 180th Street. The proposed Learning Center is located approximately 65 feet from S. 180th street and this building tops out at a relatively low 17 feet. The main roof of the proposed church building measures 45 feet above ground with a higher ornamental dome and steeples. The church building is located approximately 420 feet from S. 180th Street, reducing the apparent height of the steeples to most pedestrians and drivers. 83 RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA The existing sidewalk on the west side of Sperry Drive would be extended so that pedestrians coming from the bus station on S 180th Street could cross Sperry Drive at a preferable location and reduce the number of times they would need to walk in front of traffic. The proposed landscaping would include a significant number of trees and groundcover to be planted adjacent to the landward toe of the Green River levee. In addition to screening the parking area, this would provide an improved landscape transition between the project site and adjacent protected area. LANDSCAPING AND SITE TREATMENT A substantial portion of the site is located in the Shoreline Area with the Green River flowing on the east, west and south sides. Special care, as required by the Shoreline Master Program and Tukwila Municipal Code, special care has been taken not to disturb areas within the river buffers. This serves to recognize, preserve and enhance the banks of the Green River. Sperry Drive is a private street perpendicular to S. 180th Street. It serves as the only vehicular entrance to the project site and the main axis to the entrance of the church. Several trees are proposed to be planted on the east side of Sperry Drive which will help to provide shade along the route and strengthen the appearance the axis. The area of landscaped islands proposed in the parking area will exceed 10 SF per 300 SF of paved surface (SMP 9.10.C.3.b) and 10 SF per parking stall (TMC 18.28.240.6.6.2(2)). Decorative paving, such as stamped concrete, is proposed at certain locations to accent pedestrian entrances and other special building elements. New exterior lighting is proposed that will illuminate the parking area and pedestrian walkways to increase safety. Exterior lighting will be shielded to minimize glare, light trespass and skyglow. Future lighting to accent architectural elements and landscaping will also be shielded. BUILDING DESIGN The design of the proposed church building draws from the French colonial architecture of Saigon and represents an important connection for parishioners between Tukwila and Vietnam. As a place of worship, its design is based on the traditional characteristics of church architecture which define sacred space for the congregation. The Learning Center is subordinate and complimentary to the Church building as it maintains the low height of a single story building. The new design for this building features facade articulation with the addition of several roofs and pilasters. The design of both buildings calls for a soft and earthy color palette that features warm limestone facades with terracotta colored roofs. These natural colors would be in harmony with the verdant riverbank that runs along three sides of the property. 84 RICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC esday, October 16, 2018 BY RANGEMENT IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT © 4:35 PM ON NTS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OTHER PROJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OT THIS DOCUMENT R PARTIAL ELEVATION OF PROPOSED CHURCH NOT TO SCALE TOP OF STEEPLE ASC RIBBED METAL ROOF BORAL CLAY TILE - EL CAMINO BLEND MET -TILE MISSION CLAY (DML TILE SHOWN, SIMILAR) OPTIONAL NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL - SANDSTONE DESERT BEIGE 3- COAT STUCCO OPTIONAL EL DORADO STONE VENEER - AUTUMN LEAF I ■ 1 6847 S 180th Street • Tukwila, WA 98188 ET ANC 1 ■ 1 16.045 Plot Date: 10/16/18 Andrew Johnston2 180917_Learning_Center_AC21.pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 1 ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 ■ 10/16/18 1 ■ 1 MATERIALS MAT1 85 86 RICK ARCHITECTS, PLLC esday, October 16, 2018 BY RANGEMENT IN WIRTING COPYRIGHT © 4:36 PM ON NTS A PROPRIETARY DESIGN OWNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON OTHER PROJECTS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT OR FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BY OT THIS DOCUMENT R 4,4 #a 41, 441 44 w a PARTIAL ELEVATION OF PROPOSED LEARNING CENTER NOT TO SCALE 44,. S. .444 44, NEW COM SITE Tr E ROOF AT EXIST [NG TILT -UP WA EXOTING COVERED WALKWAY BORAL CLAY TILE - EL CAMINO BLEND MET -TILE MISSION CLAY (DML TILE SHOWN, SIMILAR) OPTIONAL HARDIE PANEL VERTICAL SIDING- 3- COAT STUCCO SMOOTH SAIL CLOTH EL DORADO STONE VENEER - AUTUMN LEAF OPTIONAL I ■ 1 6847 S 180th Street • Tukwila, WA 98188 ET ANC 1 ■ 1 16.045 Plot Date: 10/16/18 Andrew Johnston2 180917_Learning_Center_AC21.pin BRODERICK ARCI 55 S. ATLANTIC STREET, SUITE #301 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 ■ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 ■ 10/16/18 ■ 1 MATERIALS MAT2 87 88 T@ble1O4: Summary of applicable review process and standards/guidelines. See subsection 18.28.030 (D) for detailed provisions. Project Type Type Review ' Projects located in the TUC -RC, TUC-TOD, TUC-P, or TUC -CC Districts Minor remodels orvery small projects see subsection _ � Major remodels and small-scale projects seesubsect�n(D)(1)�) r— - ' Large-scale projects ^see subsection (D)(1)(c) Projects located in the TUC -Workplace District Reside ntia I/mixed-use building —small scale project Reside rtiaI/mixed~usebuDding—majorremode| � ResidentbKmhed-uoebuUding—|argesco|epnojec see subsection (D)(I)(a)(3) Other small scale new construction orexterior � expansions, see subsection (D)(I)(b)(1) -- — Other major remodels Other large-scale nexvcons1ructionorextehor expansions —see subsection (D)(2)(b)(3) Minor remodels orvery small projects see subsection (D)(2)(c) Type Type ' � Type | \ (BAR) Applicable I * Not required to meet corridor -based architectural design standards Standards Southcenter 89 Table 1B^3District Standards: District Standards__��_�� ^ 18.28.070 Structure Height ; Minimum Height Maximum Height without Incentives �Frontal Improvement Height Incentive � i � [-_- -— / / | MHeight Incentive 18.28.080 Maximum Block Face Length �Pmv�onnfN������n {85O�0ax» ' ^ 18.28.090 Permitted Corridor Types for New Streets � /Pedestrian Corridor / Regional Center TOD ! 25ftfronting 25ft fronting i 8okorBi BekarBi � 85ft ] 45ft _ 45ft Pond District permitted �� 701t 115'J | combined with � MF. BB}m / 70ft, no Affordable inoreano*/in Housing 150ftofPond ' |nmanhvo edge 70ft'115'if combined with � Frontal Imp., LEEDor 70itnn Affordable inomaoew/in ' Housing 150ftofPond � Incentive ` edge_ n/a Corridor Comm. Workplace n/a r/a � permitted.-_ '~-'-- �permitted permitted permitted /5ft 4 /5ft 4 5ft4 18.28.110 Side and Rear Landscaping Requirements-, Side and Rear Yards J5 ft 4 1~ .220Special CornerFeature Special Corner Feature mnBuilding permitted �5ft 4 5ft 4 ~ ' ' - '/a r/a 7O# Rive adjacent parcels only \ 9UDftmax | � | � permitted ' permitted -permitted-- l permitted permitted � .�'permittedpermitted | �Oft 1) Portions of the building that extend above the primary building mass, such as non -habitable space (clock towers, roof -top cupolas, elevator and mechanical equipment enclosures), unenclosed space (roof deck trellises, Gazebos), and other special architectural features, shall not exceed the maximum height requirement bymore than 20 feet, provided they are set back a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the roof (see also TMC 1OSO.O8O). 2) Does not apply to Freeway Frontage Corridors 3)Permitted adjacent toresidential uses. 4) May be waived as part of design review if Building and Fire Code requirements are met. 90 Figure 18-25: Commercial Corridor Standards Commercial Corridor Intent: To provide safe and 5upportive pedestrian facddics, greater capacity rot torhirics, and attractive streetscapes along heavily travelled roadways serving auto -oriented commercial uses. APPLIED TO: Existing Streets: Tukwila Pkwy, Southcenter Pkwy, S. 180th St, West Valley Hwy New Streets: As Indicated on Corridor Type Map Note: This is a summary of key corridor standards. See 18.28.120 to .210 for supplemental details. THOROUGHFARE CROSS-SECTION (See 18.28.140) Existing street New street No change See new cross-section PUBLIC FRONTAGE STANDARDS (See 18.28.150) Total required width Sidewalk width minimum 15 ft 6 ft Landscaping Street tree spacing Lighting Street trees in a continuous landscaped strip 9 ft wide located at back of curb. Also see 18.28.240 General Landscaping. 20-30 ft, depending on species. Vehicular -scale decorative street lighting. BUILDING ORIENTATION/PLACEMENT & LANDSCAPING (See 18.28.160 .190) Building orientation to streets Front yard setback minimum On -site surface parking locations Front yard landscaping minimum (waived if Public Frontage improvements are built to standard) Not required 15 ft Front, side or rear of building 15 ft of Streetscape ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS Facade articulation increment Commercial/mixed-use maximum 50 ft Residential maximum 30 ft Major vertical modulation maximum 200 ft Ground level transparency Commercial -use minimum 50% BdC.K CA i deV.'dik qickyovA pldnUrtg strip Public frontage rnrirkt::.4rr*iettiftr t r I r t 1. 4 rr, Facade articulation and ground level transparency 91 Figure 18-27: Workplace Corridor Standards Workplace Corridor Intent: To provide safe and supportive pedestrian facilities along streets serving truck loading and parking access for primarily worehouse/distiibution uses in the southern part of the Southcenter area. APPLIED TO: Existing Streets: Minkler Blvd (Southcenter Pkwy to APW, Costco Dr), Upland Dr, Midland Dr, Triland Dr, N./W. between Costco Dr and S. 180th St, Andover Park W. (Minkler to S. 180th St), Andover Park E. (Trek to S. 180th St), Sperry Dr New Streets: As indicated on Corridor Type Map Note: This is a summary of key corridor standards. See 18.28.120 to 2.10 for supplemental details. THROUGHFARE CROSS-SECT1ON (See 18.28.140) Existing street New street No change See new cross-section PUBLIC FRONTAGE STANDARDS (See 18.28.150) Total required width Sidewalk width minimum 15 ft 6 ft Landscaping Street tree spacing Lighting Street trees in a continuous landscaped strip 9 ft wide located at back of curb. Also see 18.28.240 General Landscaping. 30-50 ft, depending on species. Vehicular -scale street lighting. BUILDING ORIENTATION/PLACEMENT & LANDSCAPING (See 18.28.160 - .190) Building orientation to street Front yard setback minimum On -site surface parking locations Front yard landscaping minimum (waived if Public Frontage Improvements are built to standard) Not required 15 ft Front, side or rear of building 15 ft of streetscape ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS Fagade articulation increment Non-residential maximum Residential maximum Major vertical modulation maximum Ground level transparency Warehouse/light industrial buildings minimum 140 ft 30 ft 280 ft 20% Commercial -use minimum 50% Public frontage New thoroughfare cross-section Facade articulation and ground level transparency 92 hB �(l�����~ ^ _^^~~`~~~.`~'^ ,AR�- JI[ ,_/-l-S October lO,2Ol8 Ms. Lindsay Norris Brown, Assistant Planner Department ofCommunity Development City ofTukwila 630OSouthcenterB|vd,Suite |O0 Tukwila, VVA98788 RE: Comments from Karen Walter mfthe Mocbyasb**t Tribe Dear Ms. Brown Thank you for sending comments from Karen Walter of the Muckleshoot Tribe for the proposedVietnamese Martyrs Church Expansion. Please see our responses (in bold italics) to the comments listed below. Wording from Karen Walter's comments has been included for reference. 1. Where exactly are the trees (by size and species) toboremoved within 200feet ofthe Green River? Please see the attached Exhibit "C' to see the location of the 5 trees that are to be removed. The size of the trees /snoted osDiameter otBreast Height (D8H). The following trees are toberemoved. #1-6~Deciduous #2—B°Cherry #3-18"Coniferous #4-26°Fir #5-24^Cedar 2. VVodid not see the tree planting plan details needed for uotoevaluate the tree replacement plan. The details are needed. The landscape architect noted, too, that shore pine may be planted to provide shade. While shore pine (Pinus contorta) appears to be native to western Washington, we are unaware of this species growing historically along the Green River. (see forest conditions section starting onpage 55 inhUp:�your.kinqoount�gpy/dnrp/|ibnaq�p 2OU5/kor2O38�df). |fshore pine trees are eU||proposed, then they ehuu|dboreplaced with anative conifer species more suit -able for the site and capable ofgrowing tomaturity to provide shade and other riparian functions. Tree planting details will be provided along with subsequent construction drawings as part of the permit approval process for this project. Shore Pine will not be planted. Instead of Shore Pine, Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedar will beplanted. 3. VVedid notice that there are notrees planned Lobaplanted onthe weotsideofthe project site. Shade trees are needed along this side ofthe project site. (see attached SVV|FMap 2). 93 4. In our June 4, 2018 comments (sent by email), we asked for a tree planting analysis that evaluates the current tree planting plan toprovide sufficient shade. VVodid not see this inany responses orrevised materials to date. The shade analysis should consider the findings from the King County's GIS shade model for the Green River. This model shows incremental decreases in Green River temperatures starting from the OHWM with each 25-foot increment out to 150 feet, which is the buffer distance recommended in the Green River Temperature TMDLimplementation plan (VVODE2011). The 150foot buffer was determined the distance needed along 21 miles of the lower Green River to provide effective shade necessary to reduce water temperatures and increase dissolved oxygen with the objective of meeting the State's Water Quality Standards. The SVV|FMap 2mapped segments of 75 to 100 feet distances at the project site and the critical shade needed at this site (High; medium, and low segments) likely account for existing facilities and trees and the site's aspects relative to the sun. Green River shading needs isnot just anabstract environmental consideration. Anstated inKing County'oGreen River SWIF Current Conditions Report Aquatic, Floodplain, and Riparian Habitat Technical Memorandum (King County and Nonnandeau(2O14): "Water temperature isucritical limiting factor in the study area. High water temperatures stress adult salmon and reach lethal temperatures during hot summers. High temperatures also substantially reduce rearing habitat potential and cause juvenile salmonids to migrate downstream more quickly than is likely desired /nthe late spring and uummor.^ This statement is substantiated by continuous water temperature data collected in 2015 by the City of Kent at the ^Bh000a^levee site (Figure A+11from King County, 2017;.http://vo kin ntv.gov/dnrp/|ibxarv/2O17/kor2D80/kor288U.pdf)). From the data, you can see that this reach of the Green River experienced water temperatures that not only exceeded the State Standard of 17.5 degrees C, but also exceeded the 22 degrees C lethal threshold for adult salmon over several dates between July and August. Lethal and sublethal effects from water temperatures means likely reduced survival and production of salmon that support the Tribe's troah/'prote otodfisheries. The importance of lowering the water temperature of the Green River to provide a healthy habitat for salmon is understood. The site currently has veryfew trees andfeatures a large parking lot. There are currently 12 evergreen trees located within 15O'mƒthe QHN/&Y Weare proposing toremove 3ofthese trees and plant 27 new evergreen trees within 150'of the OHINM. The proposed landscaping already shows dense plantings of new evergreens in all available areas. Additional landscaping adjacent to the river is limited due to the 75' levee setback. A shade analysis would not be beneficial since the proposed site design now shows the maximum number of tall evergreen trees possible to plant adjacent to the river. 5. The project is removing two Douglas Fir trees that are 16" and 18" DBH respectively and two unspecified deciduous trees that are 6" and 14" DBH respectively within 200 feet of the river. All four ofthese trees should be placed back in the Green River as partial mitigation for the temporal loss of future wood recruitment needed to create and maintain salmon habitat. We recognize that the applicant is limited to do this mitigation work onsite; however, King County and Kent are both permitting levee setback and restoration projects on the Green River not far from this site onbehalf ofthe KCFlood District. The trees should boused atone urmore ufthese project eib+o. Allfive of the trees removed within 200' of the river will be used at one or more of the nearby project sites tocreate and maintain salmon habitat. 94 6. We maintain our recommendation to have oil control on the stormwater facilities that will ultimately discharge to the Green River to protect salmon. The WDOE manual is behind the best available science on this topic. The Civil plan sheets for this project include two bioretention cells, stormfilters, infiltration tanks with overflow to a proposed and existing storm drainage system. On -site drainage goes to an off -site drainage system within Sperry Drive. From Sperry Drive the drainage system goes West within S. 180th Street, then North on Andover Park East, and finally East on Minkler to the City's storm treatment pond. This Civil plan provides basic and enhanced water quality per the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual and meets DOE requirement. There is no direct discharge from the Vietnamese Martyrs site to the Green River. Please contact me if there is any additional information that I can provide or if you have any questions regarding our application. Thank you for your help with this project. Sincerely, (Sean) John J. Hill 95 10/3/2018 mv ' [J�'\/t Martyrs /-|, | �` Oct� /��. v����������� /v/�[��[� �-//�[[� ��V/�/(}��- D|���� [�����@ uV u�� � r � Karen Walter <KWalter@rnuckleshoot.nsn.us> nzLindsay Bmwn/Undsay,Brown@Tuhvi|aYVAgov`; SYNF'bwrGi-eenSon'Wap2.pdf; Lindsay, Thank you for sending us the revised project information for the Vietnamese Martyrs Church project (PL18'0022). We have reviewed this and have comments aonoted: Trees needed for shadina and blocking artificial lighting: 1 . Where exactly are the trees (by size and species) to be removed within 200 feet of the Green River? 2� VVedid not see the tree planting plan details needed for us to evaluate the tree replacement plan. The details are needed. The landscape architect noted, too, that shore pine may beplanted toprovide shade. While shore pine (Pinus contorta) appears to be native to western Washington, we are unaware of this species growing historically along the Green River. (see forest conditions section starting onpage 55in http //ymuckinggou n1y.|fshore pine trees are still proposed, then they should be replaced with onative conifer species more suitable for the site and capable ofgrowing 0nmaturity Vnprovide shade and other riparian functions. We did notice that there are no trees planned to be planted on the westside of the project site, Shade trees are needed along this side ofthe project site. (see attached SVV|FMap 2). 4. In our June 4, 2018 comments (sent by email), we asked for a tree planting analysis that evaluates the current tree planting plan toprovide sufficient shade. VVedid not see this jnany responses orrevised materials k/date. The shade analysis should consider the findings from the King County's GIS shade model for the Green River. This model shows incremental decreases inGreen River temperatures starting from the OHVVK4with each 254ont increment out to 150 feet, which is the buffer distance recommended in the Green River Temperature TMDL implementation plan (VVDOE2O11). The 15Ofoot buffer was determined the distance needed along 21 miles ofthe lower Green River to provide effective shade necessary to reduce water temperatures and increase dissolved oxygen with the objective ofmeeting the State'uWater Quality Standards. The SVV|FMap 2mapped segments n[75 to1U0feet distances atthe project site and the critical shade needed at this site (High�medium, and low segments) likely account for existing facilities and trees and the site's aspects relative to the sun. Green River shading needs isnot just anabstract environmental consideration. Asstated inKing County'sGreen River SWIF Current Conditions Report Aquatic, Floodplain, and Riparian Habitat Technical Memorandum (King County and Nonnandeau(2O14).- "Water temperature isacritical limiting factor in the study area. High water temperatures stress adult salmon and reach lethal temperatures during hot summers. High temperatures also substantially reduce rearing 1an-cr~ 1/3 1n/9000 mo habitat potential and cause juvenile zelnonidshomigrate downstream more quickly than islikely desired /n the late spring and summer " This statement is substantiated by continuous water temperature data collected in 2015 by the City of Kent at the "Briscoe" levee site (FigunoA+11 from King County, 2017; httg��ou�N uc2880�pdf). From the data, you can see that this reach ofthe Green River experienced water temperatures that not only exceeded the State Standard of 17.5 degrees C. but also exceeded the 22 degrees C lethal threshold for adult salmon over several dates between July and August. Lethal and sublethal effects from water temperatures means likely reduced survival and production of salmon that support the Tribe's treaty-p rote cted fisheries. Loss uftrees for future wood recruitment 5. The project is removing two Douglas Fir trees that are 16" and 18" DBH respectively and two unspecified deciduous trees that are 0''and 14^DBHrespectively within 2U8feet ofthe river. All four ofthese trees should beplaced back in the Green River as partial mitigation for the temporal loss of future wood recruitment needed to create and maintain salmon habitat. VVerecognize that the applicant ialimited todothis mitigation work onsite;however, King County and Kent are both permitting levee setback and restoration projects on the Green River not far from this site onbehalf ofthe KCFlood District. The trees should beused atone ormore ofthese project sites. Stonnwatertneo8nent - 8. We maintain our recommendation to have oil control on the stormwater facilities that will ultimately discharge to the Green River to protect salmon. The VVDOE manual in behind the best available science on this topic. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Mucklex0mot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division Habitat Program 30015-� A�ncl Ave SE Aubvm, WA980g2 253'876'3116 From: Lindsay Brown [maiIto:Undsay.Brown@Tukwi|aWA.gov] Gent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:17AM To: Karen Walter Subject: Vietnamese Martyrs Church revisions- please review by Oct 5 Hi Karen, Padke1emaUedfor comments 9.26.201.8 has most relevant materials resubmitted by the applicant on Tuesday. I'd appreciate your comments by October 5th, as it is scheduled for hearing on October 25th. The revisions include many changes 10the site, landscaping and lighting p|ans,indudinginCreased|andscaping and trees along the perimeter of the parking lot on the south and east sides of the site, and public shoreline access at the bridge. 1a»co~1 97 cm 10/912018 ma unuoay. Thank you so much for reviewing this. I need comments back by October 5th, as it's scheduled for hearing on October25th. best Lindsay Lindsay Norris Brown, Assistant Planner pronouns:shp/her/hers Department ofCommunity Development City nfTukwila 69OOSouthcenterB|vd,Suite lO0 Tukwila, WA 98188 206-433'7166 The City ofoppQF-,/�ib/the corn -unity olf choKle, CAUTION: This ernail originated from outside the City of Tukwila network. Please DO NOT open attachments or click links from an unknown nrsuspicious origin. 1uI1-oo=1nm ��'Vt Martyrs Church � /�� v�f��[)���l(��(� /v/�]�� [� `_/ /[]��/ / �)( �/ Application r` |i(-����{][l rr Karen Walter <KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us> n�Lindsay Brown ~LmdsayBmwn@TukvAa@Agov', [}|10 OO�� Notice ' � ����[l��[)[l, / � /u-uvz�c_, [}/ Taboreta|'Ai-til-hghting{)ctl4-Z00.pdtFakhi-2O1'UghoPollution article ]numalofEnvironmental Manag N/lap1LoweGreen River Riparian Aspect Priorities (MIT 2013) pdf Lindooy, Thank you again for providing us with some of the requested information for the Vietnamese MartyrsChurch Expansion project referenced above. We have reviewed this information and offer additional comments to this project: In addition our previous comments regarding potential concerns regarding impacts to Muckieshoot Tribal members' ability to access their fishing sites near and along this project site, the project needs \oavoid further impacts tusalmon and their habitats as follows: 1 Plant native conifer trees that can provide shade and block artificial light from reaching the Green River all along the project boundary areas. Currently the site plan is shown few conifer trees and mostly deciduous trees to be planted inselect areas. At times, the Green River is current experiences lethal and sublethal temperature levels that are adversely affecting returning adult salmon by causing pre -spawning mortality or reducing the fecundity of gravid female salmon. Shade iolacking along most areas nfthe lower Green River,including this project site. Shade needs vary from critical to low (but still needed) on this site depending on location (see attached Shade Map). Atee planting analysis that evaluates the proposed plan and its ability to provide sufficient shade from the project site is needed. 2. Artificial lighting from new and existing lights needs tobecarefully located and managed koavoid/minimize impacts tonutmigmdnQjuvenile salmon. As we have noted with other projects along the Green River, artificial lighting can disrupt juvenile salmon's outmigntion behavior-, increase visibility for salmon predators both in+waterand adjacent, thus may increase predation risks. These impacts are described further inthe second attachment. Adecrease in salmon survival has implications for tribal members' and their ability to exercise their treaty rights for fishing. More information and potentially analysis isneeded about the nighttime lighting proposal and its potential impacts to salmon at this location and cumulatively. Anassessment ofpotential spillover from nighttime lighting onto the Green River aswell aoincreased skyg|owlighting isneeded, The impacts ofartificial lighting need Nbeconsidered inlight ofwhere tall trees are being planted, Voo. to take advantage of screening from the trees. 3. The Preliminary Technical Information Report indicates that the site does not rely on existing flood protection facilities (pegeQ), This seems to be an error as there is an existing Green River levee that runs along the shoreline on 3 sides of this project which is providing the site (and other areas) with Mood protection. In fact, the City ofTukwila, King County, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are currently working on a significant levee repair/replacement project on this side of the river under the Tukwila 205 project. 4. The project should be provided oil control for stormwater because the project ultimately discharges stormwater to the Green River and can adversely affect juvenile salmon as a result which are particularly sensitive to PAH compounds 1an-co~1 1/3 6/5/208 mail in stonnwater. VVeappreciate the opportunity k/review this proposal and look forward toadditional information and potential project changes toaddress these concerns. If you have questions, please let me know. Best regards, Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleohmot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division Habitat Program 39015-4172'uAwy3E Auburn, WA980y2 253-876-3116 From: Lindsay Brown [maUhj:Undsay.Bnown@TukwUaVVAgov] Sent Thursday, May 24,2O18 2:59 PM To: Karen Walter Subject: Re: Vietnamese Martyrs Church Expansion, PL18'0022, Notice of Application Hi Karen, Thanks for your email and interest inthis project. Theattach/nentsaretoo|argetosendviaennai|,butyoucan access all of the application materials through our online permitting system, e-Trakit. Athttoc//)ermithng.tukwi|aw/a.gov(you can type in PL18'OO23under "Land Use Projects" andseethesuh- app|icahons/E18-OOO45EPA,L18'0O2SShore|ine,L18'OOZ6DesignReview4andL18'UO27Conditinna/Use Permit) and submitted documents under "Attachnnents" If you have any trouble accessing these, let me know and I'll set up an FTP site to get you those documents. Thanks, also for your comments on the proposed ramp- I will save that diagram of shoreline priority areas for reference for this project and other Shoreline projects. Take care, Lindsay Lindsay Norris Brown, Assistant Planner Department ofCommunity Development City ofTukwila 630O5outhcentcrB|vd,Suite l00 Tukwila, WA 98188 206-433'7166 rYBcitVof Cf chOce, From: Karen Walter «KVVaIter@rnuck|eshoot. snus, Sent: Thursday, May 24,2O1OZ:33:21PK4 To: Lindsay Brown Subject: Vietnamese Martyrs Church Expansion, PI-18-0022, Notice of Application 1m1-ou~I 2/3 We have reviewed the Notice of Application postcard for the proposed Vietnamese Martyrs Church expansion project referenced above and need additional information to fully evaluate this project: Complete site plans including the location of trees to be removed, any new fencing or other measures that would change how the Green River and its trail could be accessed from the property. Rationa|e/arboristsreport for tree removals; StornnvvaterTechniCa| Information Report Please note that we previously commented on this site's previous proposal to pave a road and construct a ramp the berm along the Green River (see attached). The City and the applicant should know that Muckleshoot fishers access treaty -protected fishing sites along this project area. Access tothe tribe's fishing sites must not beadversely affected bythis project. We appreciate the opportunity to comment and look forward to receiving the requested information. We may have further comments subsequently. Thank you, Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division Habitat Program 39015-A 1zr''Ave ss Auburn, wweanyz 253'876'3116 1uI1-vv~1 nm 102 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Tukwila Planning Commission FROM: Nora Gierloff, Deputy DCD Director DATE: October 25, 2018 SUBJECT: Shoreline Master Program Update Work Session ISSUE Tukwila is required to periodically review and revise its Shoreline Master Program and Zoning Code Shoreline Overlay for consistency with State law and Best Available Science (BAS). BACKGROUND The Green/Duwamish River in Tukwila is categorized as a Shoreline of the State. In response to the State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) and Federal requirements, Tukwila has adopted two policy documents related to the river — the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) and land use policies in the City's Comprehensive Plan. To carry out these policies, zoning regulations have been adopted in TMC Chapter 18.44 Shoreline Overlay. Most development within 200 feet on either side of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit which is reviewed by the Washington State Department of Ecology after issuance by the City. The City's shoreline development regulations balance economic and residential development with enhancement and stewardship of the ecological functions of the river. DISCUSSION The City of Tukwila completed a comprehensive update to its Shoreline Master Program in 2009, with additional revisions made in 2011. Washington state law requires jurisdictions to periodically review and update their SMPs every eight years in accordance with the SMA and its current guidelines and legislative rules to attain state approval. The City of Tukwila's update started with an open house on October 9th and will be complete in 2019. This periodic update will focus on: • Reviewing relevant legislative updates since 2009 and incorporating any applicable amendments. • Ensuring consistency with recently adopted regulations for critical areas and flood hazard areas. 103 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 This periodic update will not: • Re-evaluate the ecological baseline which was established as part of the 2009 comprehensive update. • Extensively assess no net loss criteria other than to ensure that proposed amendments do not result in degradation of the baseline condition. • Change shoreline jurisdiction or environment designations. RECOMMENDATION Identify any additional staff research needed or areas for revisions. A public hearing on the Shoreline update will be scheduled for January. The PC will then send a recommended draft to the City Council for review and adoption. ATTACHMENTS A. SMP Periodic Update FAQ B. Shoreline Update Topic Summary C. Gap Analysis Report D. Presentation Slides 1\®4ds and Commissions\Planning Commission110-25-18 PC Packet\PC WS 10-25-18.docx City of Tuk ila Pet -iodic Update of the loreline Master Program at is aShoreline aster rra ( P? A Shoreline Master Program (SMP) is a set of policies and regulations required by state law that has three basic principles: • Encourages reasonable and appropriate development of shorelines with an emphasis on water- dependent uses, which developed are consistent with the control of pollution and prevention of damage to the natural environment, such as docks, marinas, and recreational facilities, or industries and commercial uses that require a shoreline location and support economic development; and, • Protects the natural resources and character of the shorelines, the land, vegetation, wildlife, water, and aquatic life within shoreline environment; and, • Promotes public access and provides opportunities to enjoy the aesthetic qualities of the natural shorelines and recreational activities in shoreline areas. ere oes t is a lr? Shorelines are special waterbodies that meet certain size or flow criteria in the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA). These shorelines include rivers and streams with mean annual flow over 20 cubic feet per second and lakes 20 acres or larger. The shoreline jurisdiction extends 200 feet landward of the water's edge and additionally includes associated wetlands, floodways, and up to 200 feet of floodplain contiguous to the floodway. The shorelines in the City of Tukwila include the Green/Duwamish River and a small portion of the Black River. at is a eri ate of t e ? The City of Tukwila completed a comprehensive update to its Shoreline Master Program in 2009, with additional revisions made in 2011. Washington state law requires jurisdictions to periodically review and update their SMPs every eight years in accordance with the SMA and its current guidelines and legislative rules to attain state approval. This periodic update will focus on: • Reviewing relevant legislative updates since 2009 and incorporating any applicable amendments. • Ensuring consistency with recently adopted regulations for critical areas and flood hazard areas. This periodic update will NOT: • Re-evaluate the ecological baseline which was established as part of the 2009 comprehensive update. • Extensively assess no net loss criteria other than to ensure that proposed amendments do not result in degradation of the baseline condition. August 2018 Page 1 of 3 105 • Change shoreline jurisdiction or environment designations. at ty a of activities a ses o s reli a regulations a ply t Shoreline regulations apply to any land use activity that occurs within the shoreline jurisdiction as defined in the SMP. Included in those structures and uses regulated in the SMP are: • New or expanded structures, such as houses, sheds, and decks; • New or expanded in -water and over -water structures, such as docks, buoys, and boat launches; • Land development and alteration, such as clearing, grading, dredging, or filling; and • Other activities along the shorelines, including restoration (e.g., riparian planting, bank stabilization), trail construction, and public access. at is aShoreline xe t ti.n an at is re re t o tai a roval? Certain land uses and development activities are exempt from the requirement to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, but are not exempt from compliance with the Shoreline Master Program. Exemptions must be narrowly construed and all activities that are exempt from the requirement to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development permit are still required to comply with the SMP. Exemptions are issued in writing by the City after the submission of a complete application which includes a site plan. Even though an activity is exempt from requiring a Substantial Development Permit, a conditional use or variance permit may be required. Exemptions under the SMP are different than exemptions under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). 0does t e affect existinguses a evelo et? SMP regulations are not retroactive. SMP regulations apply to new development and uses. Existing uses and developments legally established may be repaired, maintained and operated. The SMP applies to proposals for expansion or alteration of existing uses and structures. Structures and uses that were legally established in the past may become legally nonconforming due to new shoreline rules that are passed over time. Current, SMP regulations allow these previously built structures and established uses to continue as they are presently operating. Recent amendments to the SMA especially recognizes existing residences which were built consistent with existing shoreline regulations at the time of construction. Residential structures that were legally established and are used for a conforming use, but that do not meet current SMP standards (e.g. height, buffers, setbacks, etc.), may be considered a conforming structure. The city's SMP may allow redevelopment, expansion, or replacement of the residential structure if it is consistent with the current SMP. As part of this periodic review and update the city will be looking at the existing SMP and opportunities consistent with state law to clarify how redevelopment, expansion, or replacement of legally established single-family homes within the shoreline jurisdiction may occur with mitigation and demonstrating there is no net loss of the shoreline ecological functions. August 2018 Page 2 of 3 106 at is lic access to s oreli es? e is it re re 7 Public access is a preferred use per the SMA. Public access can be physical access (e.g. trail) and/or visual access (e.g. view corridors). Public access standards apply to new development, not existing development. Generally, public access should only be required for private uses of certain sizes (e.g. large subdivisions, resorts, etc.) and shall be required for public uses. Public access requirements do not allow for trespass on private property. at is et Loss? The SMP Guidelines establish the standard of no net loss. No net loss means that over time, the aggregate existing condition of shoreline ecological functions should remain the same as when the SMP is implemented. Simply stated, the no net loss standard is designed to balance the introduction of new impacts to shoreline ecological functions resulting from new development through mitigation sequencing and restoration. The City must achieve this standard through both the SMP planning process and by appropriately regulating individual developments as they are proposed in the future. Any amendments to the SMP that may occur through the periodic update process would need to comply with the no net loss standard. can 1 sec ore fir atio Website: http://www.tukwilawa.gov/departments/community-development/shoreline-management/ Contact: Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director Department of Community Development, City of Tukwila Phone: (206) 433-7141 Email: nora.gierloff@tukwilawa.gov August 2018 Page 3 of 3 107 108 1 Topic t Description S Consistency Updates Update dollar thresholds, update State Code references, update definitions (development, floodway), reference new exemptions in WAC, floating home policy, reference updated Comprehensive Plan policies Critical Areas Update to reference 2014 wetland rating system, 2011 federal delineation manual and buffers to meet Dept. of Ecology guidance, wetland mitigation banking, OR Replace with a reference to the updated City-wide critical area regulations Non -conformities Clarify use regulations per new WAC section, additional flexibility allowed for residential structures Levee Profile Allow flexibility in the City's preferred levee profile to allow for varying conditions. Improved designs should not require a variance. Permitted Uses Remove the use list and replace with the use matrix consistent with the Zoning Code Shoreline Buffers Place written standards into a table for ease of use Recreational Structures Currently limited to 15' height and 25 square feet, allow more flexibility Topic I1 V 1 Description Housekeeping Add an introduction or purpose to the Chapter, streamline for usability Consistency Updates Include references to the Shoreline Design Guidelines and updated Tree Regulations, align inconsistent definitions, clarify that consistency with the SMA and WAC is required Mitigation Monitoring Clarify that 5 years of monitoring for plant survival in mitigation projects is required Vegetation Management Clarify that removal of invasive species or noxious weeds is exempt from permitting Trail Width Standard for 14' trail with 2' shoulders is inconsistent with County and City Park standards which require 12' with 2' shoulders Overwater Structures Require proof of submittal rather than approval for state and federal permits Bridges Clarify how bridges are regulated Shoreline Redesignation Include a process to change a shoreline environment designation Permit Revisions Include a process to review changes to shoreline permits Permit Timelines Amend to include a reference to WAC 173-27-090 109 110 City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program Gap Analysis Report Prepared on behalf of: The City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Prepared by: T WAT FRS H:E D COMP ALNY 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland WA 98033 p 425.822.5242 f 425,827.8136 watershedco.com October 2018 The Watershed Company Reference Number: 180506 1 1 1 112 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Consistency with Legislative Amendments 3 3. Consistency with Sensitive Areas Ordinance 7 4. Consistency with Other Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan 8 S. Usability Recommendations 10 List of Tab es Table 1. Summary of gaps in consistency with legislative amendments, and associated mandatory and recommended SMP revisions. 3 Table 2. Summary of recommended SMP, TMC, and Comprehensive Plan revisions to improve consistency. 8 Table 3. Summary of recommended SMP revisions to enhance usability. 10 113 114 Introc,uctuoin In accordance with the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA), local jurisdictions with shorelines of the state are required to conduct a periodic review of their Shoreline Master Programs (SMPs) (WAC 173-26-090). This review is intended to keep SMPs current with amendments to state laws or rules, changes to local plans and regulations, changes in local circumstances, and new or improved data and information. The City of Tukwila (City) adopted its current SMP in 2011 (Ordinance No. 2344). Shorelines of the State in Tukwila include the Green/Duwamish River and a small portion of the Black River. The Tukwila SMP includes goals and policies, shoreline environment designations, and development regulations that guide the development and protection of these shorelines. As a first step in the periodic review process, The Watershed Company (Watershed) reviewed the current SMP for consistency with legislative amendments made since its adoption. Watershed staff also reviewed the current SMP for consistency with the policies in the City's Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2015, and with the implementing development regulations in the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC). Finally, as the periodic review process represents an opportunity to revise and improve the SMP, both City and Watershed staff reviewed the current SMP for overall usability. The purpose of this gap analysis report is to provide a summary of the review and inform updates to the SMP. The report is organized into the following sections according to the content of the review: • Section 2 identifies gaps in consistency with legislative amendments. This analysis is based on a list of amendments between 2007 and 2017, as summarized by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) and provided to the City as a Periodic Review Checklist. • Section 3 identifies gaps in consistency with the City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) (Chapter 18.45 TMC). The SAO was most recently updated in 2010, and applies to critical areas outside of shoreline jurisdiction, while the SMP contains in Chapter 10 its own separate set of regulations that apply to critical areas within shoreline jurisdiction. • Section 4 identifies gaps in consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and with implementing sections of the City's development regulations other than the SAO. Specifically, the review includes Title 18 (excluding Chapters 18.44 and 18.45) of the TMC. • Section 5 identifies issues of usability by both City staff and residents. For each section, the report presents the topic, relevant section(s) in the SMP, a summary of the analysis (consistency or usability), and a recommendation for revisions to the SMP. 115 116 2. Consistency with Legislative Amendments Table 1 summarizes mandatory and recommended revisions to the Tukwila SMP regulations based on the review of consistency with legislative amendments made since SMP adoption. Topics are organized broadly by SMP subject area. In general, mandatory changes to the SMP are minor in nature. The majority of them address revised rules with regard to SMP applicability, including updated exemption thresholds and definitions. Ecology has also developed new guidance on regulating nonconforming uses, structures, and development that could be of use to the City in clarifying the nonconformance regulations in its SMP, as well as recent modifications to wetland buffer guidance that could be applied to both shoreline and non -shoreline wetland regulations. Table 1. Summary of gaps in consistency with legislative amendments, and associated mandatory and recommended SMP revisions. No. Topic (Amendment Year) Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Consistency Review Recommendation Applicability 1 Cost threshold for non-exempt substantial development updated (2017) Chapter 3, Definitions The SMP includes a definition with reference to an outdated dollar threshold. Mandatory: Revise definition of "substantial development" to refer to the updated dollar threshold and/or WAC definition, as adjusted by OFM every 5 years. 2 Definition of "development" updated to exclude dismantling or removing structures (2017) Chapter 3, Definitions The SMP does not clarify that removing structures does not constitute development. Recommended: Revise definition of "development" to clarify this exclusion. Example language from Ecology is available. 3 New rules clarify exceptions to local review under the SMA (2017) Chapter 14, Administration, section 14.2(B) and Chapter 3, Definitions The SMP addresses exemptions in WAC 173-27-040. Individual exemptions under that section are addressed elsewhere throughout the SMP. The SMP does not refer to WAC 173-27-044 or -045. Mandatory: Add reference to statutory exceptions. Recommended: Revise Chapter 14 to more comprehensively address exemptions and exceptions from all three relevant sections of the WAC, as amended. 3 117 The Watershed Company October 2018 City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program Gap Analysis No. Topic (Amendment Year) Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Consistency Review Recommendation 4 Retrofitting existing structures for ADA compliance is now exempt from shoreline permit requirements (2016) Chapter 14, Administration Section 14.2(B) addresses exemptions in WAC 173-27-040. Section 14.5(B) contains provisions for non- conforming structures. Recommended: Consider revising 14.5(B) to clarify that restrictions on modifications to existing non- conforming structures do not apply to ADA retrofits. 5 Cost threshold for exempt replacement of docks on lakes and rivers increased to $20,000 from $10,000 (2014) Chapter 3, Definitions Chapter 3 includes a definition of "substantial development" with reference to the outdated dollar threshold. Mandatory: Revise text to refer to updated dollar threshold, and/or refer directly to WAC 173-27-040 and RCW.90.58.030(3)(e) for the list of exemptions. Use and Development Provisions 6 Updated wetlands critical areas guidance refers to the 2014 wetlands rating system (2016) Chapter 10, Environmentally Sensitive Areas within the Shoreline Jurisdiction Section 10.6(D) refers to the 2004 rating system. Ecology provided revised wetland buffer guidance in July of 2018. The revised guidance indicates that wetlands scoring 5 habitat points may use the same standard buffer width as wetlands scoring 3-4 habitat points, and standard buffers for wetlands scoring 6-7 habitat points may be set at 110 feet rather than 165 feet. Recommended approach to mandatory change: Revise SMP to reference updated SAO, which will incorporate 2014 wetlands rating system. Recommended: Revise SAO to include July 2018 habitat score and buffer recommendations from Ecology. 7 New definition and policy for floating on- water residences legally established before July 1, 2014 (2014) Chapter 9, Shoreline Development Standards Section 9.12(E) contains provisions for live-aboards, which are permitted in the Aquatic environment. No definition of live -aboard is provided in Chapter 3, Definitions. Mandatory: Revise Chapter 3 and Chapter 9 consistent with the new statutory definition and regulations for floating on -water residences. 118 No. Topic (Amendment Year) Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Consistency Review Recommendation 8 Wetlands must be delineated in accordance with the approved federal wetland delineation manual (2011) Chapter 10, Environmentally Sensitive Areas within the Shoreline Jurisdiction Section 10.6(A) refers to the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (WDOE Publication #96-94). Recommended approach to mandatory change: Revise SMP to reference updated SAO, which will refer to the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements, per WAC 173- 22-035. 9 Ecology adopted a rule for certifying wetland mitigation banks (2009) N/A The SMP does not address wetland mitigation banks. Recommended: The City may wish to consider Ecology's recommendation that SMP provisions (or referenced SAO provisions) authorize the use of mitigation banks. 10 New options for defining "floodway" as either the area that has been established in FEMA maps, or the floodway criteria set in the SMA (2007) Chapter 3, Definitions The definition of "floodway" in Chapter 3 is not consistent with either option provided by the statute. Mandatory: Revise the definition of floodway to either refer to FEMA maps or use SMA criteria consistent with RCW 90.58.030(2)(b)(ii). Nonconformance 11 Ecology clarified default provisions for nonconforming uses and development (2017) Chapter 14, Administration, section 14.5 The SMP includes provisions for nonconforming uses and development in section 14.5. Recommended: The revised WAC could provide ideas for clarifications or improvements to the existing provisions in SMP. 12 SMPs may classify legally established residential structures and appurtenant structures as conforming even if they do not meet dimensional or bulk standards. Redevelopment, expansion, and replacement consistent with the SMP would be allowed (2011) Chapter 14, Administration Sections 14.5(B)(5) and (6) provide allowances for nonconforming residential structures. Recommended: The City may wish to review these provisions and consider revising to more clearly classify existing structures as conforming. 5 119 The Watershed Company October 2018 City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program Gap Analysis No. Topic (Amendment Year) Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Consistency Review Recommendation Administration 13 New rule describing the process local governments must following when conducting periodic reviews (2017) Chapter 17, Master Program Review and Amendments Chapter 17 addresses SMP review and amendments, referring to RCW 90.58 and WAC 173-26. Recommended: The City may wish to consider more specific statutory references (e.g. RCW 90.58.080 and WAC 173-26-090) for the sake of usability. 14 New rule created an optional SMP amendment process that allows for a shared local/state public comment period (2017) Chapter 17, Master Program Review and Amendments Chapter 17 addresses SMP review and amendments, referring to RCW 90.58 and WAC 173-26. More specific amendment procedures may be laid out in other chapters of the TMC. Recommended: The City may wish to consider the use of the new optional SMP amendment process, and if so should review local amendment procedures to ensure there are no impediments to using it. 15 New Growth Management Act —Shoreline Management Act clarifications (2009) Chapter 10, Environmentally Sensitive Areas within the Shoreline Jurisdiction, and Chapter 17, Master Program Review and Amendments Chapter 10 includes provisions for critical areas in shoreline jurisdiction. Section 17.2 refers to the effective date of SMP amendments. Mandatory: Revise 17.2 to clarify that SMPs are effective 14 days from Ecology's written notice of final action. Recommended: Replace Chapter 10 with an adoption by reference of the updated SAO, with exceptions/modifications as necessary. 16 The Legislature added moratoria authority and procedures to the SMA (2009) N/A The SMP does not address this. Recommended: Consider adding provisions to address moratoria authority. Ecology has provided example language. 6 120 3. Consis_ency with Sensitive Areas Orcinance Based on a review of consistency with the City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO), codified in Chapter 18.45 TMC and adopted in 2010, there are numerous minor inconsistencies exist between the way the SAO and SMP designate and protect critical areas. Many of these appear to be a result of the time difference between adoptions of the two documents. We recommend that the City address these inconsistencies through direct adoption by reference in the SMP of the City's SAO, which is scheduled to be amended and adopted immediately prior to SMP adoption. Specific exceptions to the SAO required by statute may be called out in Chapter 18.45 TMC. 7 121 The Watershed Company October 2018 City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program Gap Analysis 4 Consistency - t thOf 1er�l�y�|()O���Dt���u|��{)�����(-()F��r������y��|an Development ' Regulations -� - Comprehensive �� � Plan Table 2summarizes recommended revisions tothe Tukwila SMPbased onareview cd consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Tukwila Municipal [ode(TMC).TheComprehensivePlan was updated in 2015 and is generally consistent with the SMP; however, certain policies can be updated to better align with SMP language. Certain code chapters that mpy|v within shoreline jurisdiction, such aethe Tree Regulations ([hoyterTM[ l8.54),refer tooutdated SMPprovisions and should heupdated. In general, cross-references within Tide l8-both from the SMP to other code chapters and vice versa- could be strengthened to clarify applicability nfthe SMP. Table 2. Summary of recommended SMP, TMC, and Comprehensive Plan revisions to improve consistency. No. Topic Relevant Section(s) in2Q11 S&AP, TMC,mr Comprehensive Plan Consistency Review Recommendation Comprehensive Plan 1 Shoreline Goals and Policies SMPChapter 6 The SMPreferences the [ity's1995 Comprehensive Plan, with proposed amendments. Many ofthese have since been adopted inthe 2Ol6Comprehensive Plan. Update Chapter Gofthe 3W1PLorefer tothe 2OI5Comprehensive Plan. Incorporate small language changes topolicies throughout. 2 Policies for development outside the Tukwila Urban Center orW1|C SK4PSection 6.3/ Comprehensive Plan Goal 5-3 Numbering and language for policies 5.3.8' 5.3.9,and 5.3.10differ slightly between the SMPand Comprehensive Plan. Revise the SK4Ptoalign with more recent Comprehensive Plan language and numbering for these policies. 3 Levee profile SK4P7.5(8),Figure 2 /Comprehensive Plan Goal 5-10, Figure5'2 The SMPand Comprehensive Plan both reference the City'xadopted minimum levee profile with agraphic ofthe preferred profile. Amend the Comprehensive Plan and SMPto include apolicy stating/describing the City's preferred levee profile. Development Regulations 4 Shoreline Design Guidelines TK4[18.44.l10 (SMP)/Title l8 Projects within shoreline jurisdiction are subject tothe Shoreline Design Guidelines as Where design review and shoreline projects are mentioned throughout Title 18(e.O.Chapter 8 122 No. Topic Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP, TMC, or Comprehensive Plan Consistency Review Recommendation part of required design review. The SMP refers to the design review process and non- shoreline criteria. Other chapters of the TMC refer to the need for shoreline design review, but do not mention the Shoreline Design Guidelines. 18.60, Board of Architectural Review), refer to both shoreline and non -shoreline design guidelines. 5 Tree Regulations Chapter 18.54 TMC Tree removal within shoreline jurisdiction is subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.54. The chapter refers to outdated shoreline environments (e.g. Low -Impact Environment, TMC 18.54.130). The SMP itself does not reference the Tree Regulations. Update outdated shoreline code references in Chapter 18.52 and 18.54 TMC, and clarify that these standards do not apply in shoreline jurisdiction, where 18.44.080 applies. 6 Definitions SMP Chapter 3 / Chapter 18.06 TMC Several definitions in the SMP are similar, but not the same as, definitions found in the TMC. For example, definition inconsistencies (including missing definitions) were found for the following terms: accessory use, high - impact environment, low -impact environment, river environment, shoreline, substantial development Amend the definitions in both documents (SMP and TMC). Where definitions differ, focus on statutory requirements. 9 123 The Watershed Company October 2018 City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program Gap Analysis 5. Usability Recommendations Table 3 summarizes recommended revisions to the Tukwila SMP based on a review of general usability of the document by both Watershed and City staff. Topics are organized broadly by SMP subject area. The majority of these recommendations arise from City staff experience in implementing the SMP and a desire to make the regulations clearer and more internally consistent. Note that all revisions will need to be made consistently to both the SMP and its codified regulations in Chapter 18.44 TMC. Table 3. Summary of recommended SMP revisions to enhance usability. No. Topic Permitted Uses Internal consistency Dimensional Standards 2 Shoreline buffers Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Permitted uses by SED (TMC 18.44.040-.065 / Sections 8.4-8.7) vs. Use Matrix (Figure 18-1 / Section 3) 18.44.040-.060 Usability Discussion The City has identified several inconsistencies between the permitted use provisions listed by SED and those in the matrix (e.g. utilities and utility towers allowed as "P" or "C") Subsection A of each upland SED "uses" section defines the required width of the shoreline buffer in that SED. These are described in more detail in Section 7.5 of the SMP, which does not have an analogous subsection within the SED use sections in Chapter 8. Recommendation Review both sections for consistency and determine which section shall control. Default is for written provisions to control; however, the City may wish to reinterpret some of these provisions. Alternatively, remove the written provisions and rely exclusively on the use matrix, with footnotes as necessary to provide additional conditions, as well as use -specific provisions in subsections of 18.44.070. Summarize shoreline buffers by SED in a table, and remove from the SED uses sections. This table could also contain other dimensional criteria currently incorporated into written provisions (e.g. height restrictions) to enhance usability. 10 124 No. Topic Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Usability Discussion Recommendation 3 Truncated shoreline buffers Section 7.4, Table 3 Table 3, Summary of Buffer Widths for Land Use Zones and Shoreline Ecological Conditions, was used to define the shoreline buffers included in TMC 18.44. The final entry in the table states that where a street or road runs parallel to the river through a shoreline buffer, the buffer should be truncated on the river side of the existing improved street or roadway. Incorporate this provision into the shoreline buffer standards in the TMC. Should buffers be summarized in a table, as recommended above, a table footnote could include this provision. 4 Recreational structures 18.44.070 / Sections 8.4, 8.6, 8.8 The SMP limits recreational structures to a height of 15 feet and an area of 25 square feet. In the City's experience, this is too restrictive for certain structures, e.g. viewing platforms. Revisit dimensional criteria for recreational structures. General Use and Development Provisions 5 Environmental Impact Mitigation - monitoring 18.44.070.H Mitigation sequencing requires monitoring. However, specifications are not provided on monitoring duration. Require a minimum of five years' monitoring where vegetation mitigation is required. 6 Vegetation protection and landscaping — exempt activities 18.44.080.A The code does not specify what types of vegetation management may be allowed without a permit, focusing instead on provisions applicable to land under development. Amend this section to include a list of vegetation management activities such as, e.g., removal of invasive vegetation or noxious weeds. 7 Vegetation protection and landscaping — maintenance and monitoring 18.44.080.D Where vegetation is planted as part of a required mitigation or restoration, monitoring should be required. Based on City experience, the code should provide for situations in which overplanting is necessary to protect against invasive vegetation, and thinning is required following vegetation establishment. Revise section to clarify this approach. Clarification could be placed in "exempt activities" section described in #6 of this table, above, or in 18.44.080.D. 8 Public access 18.44.100 The existing dimensional standards for trails (14' wide with two -foot shoulders) is not Revisit trail standards and consider reducing to a minimum of 12' wide with two -foot 11 125 The Watershed Company October 2018 City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program Gap Analysis No. Topic Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Usability Discussion Recommendation consistent with the County or City Parks standards which require a 12' wide trail with two -foot shoulders. The City has received submittal of several variance applications due to this inconsistency. shoulders, or applying the reduced minimum where the applicant demonstrates it to be necessary due to lack of space. Specific Use and Development Standards 9 Minimum levee profile 18.44.070.D, Flood Hazard Reduction In the case that a proposed levee profile improves upon the adopted minimum levee profile, a shoreline variance should not be required. Revise subsection (10) to provide flexibility where an applicant demonstrates, and the City Engineer confirms, that the proposed levee profile will provide improved shoreline ecological functions and flood protection relative to the adopted minimum profile. 10 Permitting of over- water structures 18.44.070.K, Marinas, Boat Yards, Dry Docks, Boat Launches, Piers, Docks, and other Over -Water Structures Subsection 1 requires that the applicant present state and federal approvals prior to issuance of an SSDP for construction of piers, docks, wharves, and other over -water structures. This approach is inconsistent with other City land use approval procedures and may be at odds with state or federal permit requirements. Revise subsection 1 to require proof of submittal, rather than approval, of state and federal permit requirements, as applicable. 11 Classification of bridges 18.44.070.K, Marinas, Boat Yards, Dry Docks, Boat Launches, Piers, Docks, and other Over -Water Structures City experience permitting a new pedestrian bridge raised the question of whether a bridge would be considered an over -water structure. Requirements for grated decking may pose a safety issue for non -motorized users. Clarify how bridges are regulated, either in this section or in Chapter 18.06, Definitions. 12 126 No. Topic Relevant Section(s) in 2011 SMP Usability Discussion Recommendation Nonconformance 12 Amortization 18.44.130.E During original drafting of the nonconformance regulations, the City set a goal to amortize nonconforming uses and structures. No code revisions are recommended; however, the City should discuss and evaluate progress toward its amortization goal. 13 Parking lots 18.44.130.E(6) City shoreline jurisdiction includes several nonconforming parking lots. Nonconforming gravel lots within shoreline jurisdiction may not be paved without losing nonconforming status, regardless of approach to stormwater control. To provide flexibility, consider amending this section to allow for paving together with pollution controls and restoration of or other improvement to shoreline ecological functions. Administration 14 Purpose 18.44.010 Chapter 18.44 does not include an introduction or definition of purpose. To improve usability and provide context, consider adding an introductory subsection that defines the purpose of the Shoreline Overlay District chapter. 15 Shoreline Environment Designation amendments 18.44.130 This section does not address the administrative procedure/requirements for a request of change in shoreline environment designation. Consider amending this section to include a description of this process. 16 Permit revisions 18.44.130 This section does not address the administrative procedure/requirements for revisions to shoreline permits. Consider amending this section to include a description of this process, and/or a reference to WAC 173-27-100. 17 Permit timelines 18.44.130 This section does not address time limits on shoreline permits, including period of validity, requirements for project completion, extensions, etc. Consider amending this section to include a description of this process, and/or a reference to WAC 173-27-090. 18 SSDP approval criteria 18.44.130.B(3) This subsection requires that a development be consistent with the SMP as a condition for approval. Revise this subsection to require consistency with the Shoreline Management Act and applicable chapters of the WAC in addition to the SMP. 13 127 128 10/16/2018 Why now? Periodic updates are required by Washington State to ensure that local regulations: • Keep up with changes to State Law • Reflect Best Available Science (BAS) • SMP rewritten in 2o09 • Shoreline Regulations were last updated in zoi • Critical Areas Regulations were last updated in 2010 State Shoreline Goals Overarching goal is "to prevent the inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines." Shorelines should prioritize "water -oriented" uses, including Chose Chat are Ovate dependent," "water -related," and for "water -enjoyment." Preferred uses are designed to: • Recognize and protect statewide over local interests • Preserve the natural character of the shoreline • Result in long-term rather than short-term benefits • Protect shoreline resources and environment • Increase public access to publicly -owned shoreline areas • Expand recreational shoreline opportunitiesforthe public Tukwila is updating its Environmental Regulations in 2 areas: • Shoreline Regulations for the Green River • Shoreline Master Program (SMP) • Zoning Code Chapter 18.44 Shoreline Overlay • Critical Areas Regulations for wetlands, watercourses and steep slopes • Zoning Code Chapter 18.45 State Shoreline Goals Public Trust Doctrine: • Waters of the state are a public resource for the purposes of nawgation,conductmg commerce, fishing, recreation, and similar uses. Protect shoreline natural resources against adverse environmental effects including: • Land • Vegetation • Wildlife • Aquatic habitats All allowed uses are required to offset adverse environmental impacts as rnuch as possible and preserve the natural character and aesthetics of the shoreline 129 10/16/2018 Shoreline Environrne.nts • Define the purpose of that part of the shoreline • Control the buffer width • Determine the permitted uses Tukwila Shoreline Regulation Shoreline Master Program • Regulates development for zoo feet on each side of the Green River • Buffer- the area closest to the water is the most protective • Outer area allows more uses and development • 12.5 Miles of Shoreline in Tukwila • Includes transition zone between fresh and r,a., " r"'"°°'n.�a�.a�.a<•i.�a,umrr„�m.,.�n�we>s„a am,rm ,-�. salt water • Critical Habitat for endangered salmon Shoreline Environments There are different shoreline zones with different regulations: • High Intensity Environment • Areas downstream Rom the turning basin • Buffer is too feet • Urban Conservancy Environment • Non-residential areas upstream from the turning basin • Buffer is 125 feet where there is a levee, son feet elsewhere • Shoreline Residential Environment • Areas zoned for residential use • Buffer is distance needed for 2.5_s slope plus so feet • Aquatic Environment • River area between the ordinary high water marks (OHWM) Proposed Edits and Updates - Consistency • Update definition of development to exclude demolition • Add definition for floating homes • Remove outdated dollar threshold for substantial development including docks and replace with reference to WAC definition • Remove list of exemptions and refer to WAC • Exempt ADA retrofitting from shoreline permit req ements and non- conforming regulations per WAC • Consider legally established homes as conforming even if they do not meet current location or size standards 130 2 10/16/2018 Proposed Edits and Updates - Housekeeping • Streamline and reorganize the code for ease of use • Replace use hst with tables • Correct permit process inconsistencies, create a process for changes to shoreline environment designations, include time limits for permits • Incorporate new provisions for non -conforming uses and development per WAC • Update references to state regulations (WAC and RCW) • Include references to moratoria provisions in RCW • Remove proposed Comprehensive Plan policies that are now adopted Proposed Edits and Updates - Recreatio • Allow recreational structures to be larger than 25 square feet and 25 feet tall for greater usability for the public • Trail Width-- reduce the standard from 24' with z' shoulders to sz' with 2' shoulders to match King County and City Park standards Proposed Edits and Updates — Levee Profile • Allow flexibility in the preferred profile to account for varying conditions and allow improved functions nun Levee Profile Proposed Edits and Updates - Vegetation • Clarify that permits are not required for removal of invasive species • Restoration plantings must be monitored for survival for 5 years Update Process Project documents, meeting announcements, and other resources MI be pored to the City's webstte aY- Planning Commission Work Sessons & Public Hearing Gty Counul Review & Pu Glic Hearng Counul Adopton Ecology Approval 131