Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit PL11-002 - REALCOM ASSOCIATES - WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CLEARWIRE DOUBLETREE 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY PL1 1-002 LII-003 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace. Director March 21, 2011 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Sarah Telschow, RealCom Associates, Applicant CHA Southcenter, LLC, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L11-003 Applicant: Sarah Telschow, RealCom Associates Type of Permit Applied for: Type II Non -concealed Building Attached Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) Permit Project Description: Installation of one new flush -mounted antenna, replacement and upgrade of two existing microwave dishes, and installation of a new equipment cabinet on the rooftop of the Doubletree Hotel. Location: 16500 Southcenter Parkway (parcel number 643730-0020) Associated Files: PL11-002 (Land Use Project File), D11-004 (Building Permit) Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Type II Wireless Communications Facilities Permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision and based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. If an MDNS was issued, any person wishing to challenge either the conditions which were imposed by the MDNS decision or the failure of the Department to impose additional conditions in the MDNS must raise such issues as part of the appeal to the Hearing Examiner. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision; that is, by April 4, 2011. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. JR Page 2 of 3 3:51:00 PM H:\Wireless Telecommunication Facilities\1.11-003_Clearwire_Doubletree\111-003_ClearwireDoubletree_NOD .doc 03/18/2011 The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Jaimie Reavis, who may be contacted at 206-431-3659 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period if no appeal is filed. C Department of Community Development City of Tukwila JR Page 3 of 3 3:51:00 PM H:\Wireless Telecommunication Facilities\1.11-003_Clearwire_Doubletree\111-003_ClearwireDoubletree_NOD .doc 03/18/2011 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: OWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: ASSOCIATED PERMITS: SEPA DETERMINATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE DESIGNATION: STAFF: NOTIFICATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR PREPARED March 9, 2011 L11-003 Sarah Telschow, RealCom Associates on behalf of Clearwire CHA Southcenter LLC Approval of a Type II non -concealed building attached Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) Permit to install one new flush - mounted antenna, replace and upgrade two existing microwave dishes, and install a new equipment cabinet on the rooftop of the Doubletree Hotel. 16500 Southcenter Parkway D11-004 (Building Permit) Exempt from SEPA Tukwila Urban Center Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Zoning District Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner Notice of Application was mailed on February 4, 2011 to the applicant, and departments and agencies with jurisdiction. • Project Plans, dated stamped received by the City January 6, 2011 • Project Description and Response to Approval Criteria from applicant • Photo Simulations • Non -Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis & Engineering Certification • Structural Calculations for Antenna and Microwave Dishes Installation on Existing Penthouse Walls and Equipment Cabinet Installation on Existing Platform 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phonw 206-4 31- 3670 • Fnr• 2fl6-4 31- 3665 FINDINGS VICINITY/SITE INFORMATION Project Description The applicant is requesting approval of a Type II Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) Permit to add, replace and upgrade equipment on an existing rooftop wireless telecommunications facility at the Doubletree Hotel. One new flush -mounted panel antenna is proposed on the wall of the existing penthouse. Two existing microwave dishes located against the wall of the penthouse will be replaced with two new, slightly larger microwave dishes. The new antenna, microwave dishes, and associated mounting hardware will be painted to mach the color of the building. Coaxial cables and feed lines will be concealed from view. A new equipment cabinet will also be added to the rooftop. The height of the new cabinet will be 30 inches higher than the existing equipment cabinet. The height of the new cabinet will be screened by the height of the parapet wall. Existing Development The site is currently developed as an eight -story hotel with a wireless telecommunications facility on the rooftop. Surrounding Land Uses The property is zoned Tukwila Urban Center. Surrounding development includes restaurant, office, and retail uses. Tukwila Pond is located adjacent to the project site's southeastern edge. Southcenter Parkway borders the site on the west. BACKGROUND In 2006, the City adopted a Wireless Facilities Chapter (TMC 18.58) to the Zoning Code. The chapter provides specific location and design requirements for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. Location Selection Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) section 18.58.050 A, B and C provide a hierarchy of appropriate locations within the City. TMC section 18.58.050 A, Table A contains the different types of wireless communications and permit required, listed in order of preference from top of the table to bottom. Generally, co -locations and utilizing existing structures are favored over the development of new standalone WCF within the City. The applicant has proposed to install the new wireless communication facilities on the rooftop of a hotel located in the TUC commercial zoning district. The new facilities will be co -located on the rooftop with other existing wireless telecommunications facilities. The new antenna and microwave dishes will be set back from the edge of the roof and painted to match the colors of the existing building but will still be able to be seen and will therefore be a Type 2 non -concealed building attached facility. Per TMC 18.58.050 B, the applicant must demonstrate that the more preferable wireless communication facility types have been considered and provide evidence for why a less preferable WCF will need to be installed. The applicant provided the following information: Clearwire reviewed the area for alternative locations in order to completely assess a less intrusive alternative to the proposed site modification. No viable alternatives were found. The existing building accommodates existing telecommunication facilities. Modifying the existing facility at this site location is the least intrusive option to the neighborhood. JR Page 2 of 5 03/10/2011 H:\Wireless Telecommunication Facilities\L11-003_Clearwire Doubletree_SR.doc Per Table A in Section 18.58.050, the following types of facilities are preferred (in order of preference): • Transmission tower co -location • Adding antennas to an existing tower • Utility pole co -location • Concealed building attached In this immediate area, there are no existing transmission towers and/or existing towers. Additionally, the utility poles in the area do not provide adequate height. Due to the existing telecommunication facilities located on the roof and attached to the penthouse structure, Clearwire could not conceal the proposed modified one (1) new panel antenna and the replacement/upgrade of two (2) existing microwave dishes. The new proposed antenna and microwave replacement will be painted to match the existing building. The proposed rooftop location of the new WCF within the TUC zoning district is in conformance with 18.58.050 C, which states that the City's preference for locating new wireless communication facilities is to place antennas on existing structures in nonresidentially-zoned districts and nonresidential property. DESIGN STANDARDS The City provides specific design standards for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. The tables below indicate whether the applicant's proposal complies with the required standards. General Requirements (TMC 18.58.070) Table 1 Specific Design Project Project Not Applicable Notes: Standards does comply does not comply 1. Generators must comply with TMC 8.22 regarding noise. N/ There is no generator proposed. An Acoustical Study submitted with application materials contains information on anticipated noise levels from the new equipment cabinet. 2.Business License Requirement ./ Clearwire has applied for a business license at this location. 3. Only safety signage must be placed on the WCF .1/ No signage is proposed. 4. Accommodations for parking for maintenance personal must be provided. ,/ Parking located on project site will provide adequate parking for maintenance of the wireless facility. 5. Towers shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or be painted a neutral color. i/ No tower is proposed. JR Page 3 of 5 H:\Wireless Telecommunication Facilities \LI 1-003_Clearwire Doubletree_SR.doc 03/10/2011 6. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities to the natural setting and built environment. V The antenna and microwave dishes proposed will be painted to match the building. Feed lines, coaxial cables and associated mounting hardware will be concealed from view. The new equipment cabinet will be screened from view by the height of the parapet wall of the building. 7. Antennas shall have the same color scheme as the structure they are located on. V The antennas will be painted to match the color of the building. 8. Towers shall only have safety lights if required by a government agency. 1/ No towers or lighting are proposed. 9. No advertising is permitted on WCF V No advertising is proposed. Non -Concealed Building Mounted Development Requirements (TMC 18.58.110) Table 2 1. Each service provider shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet. I/ The new equipment enclosure for Clearwire will be approximately 30 square feet. 2. Proposed facility V The facility is located in the must meet the height TUC district, which has a requirements of the height limit of 115 feet. The applicable zoning new equipment is well category. within this height limit 3. Antenna aesthetics V The new antenna will be — the first preference is flush -mounted and painted to to utilize flush- match the color of the mounted antennas. building. Nonflush-mounted antennas may be used when the visual impact will be negated by the scale of the antennas to the building. JR Page 4 of 5 H:\Wireless Telecommunication Facilities\L11-003_Clearwire Doubletree_SR.doc 03/10/2011 4. Feed lines and coaxial cables should be located below the parapet of the rooftop. If the feed lines and cables must be visible, they must be painted to match the color scheme of the building. ,/ The feed lines and coaxial cables will be concealed from view. 5. The first preference is for cabinet equipment to be located in the building where the wireless communication facilities will be located ,/ The equipment will be located behind the parapet wall on the rooftop of the building. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal to install a new antenna, to replace and upgrade two microwave dishes, and to construct a new equipment cabinet on the rooftop of the Doubletree located at 16500 Southcenter Parkway will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. 2. As demonstrated in Table 1 and Table 2, the project meets all applicable development standards for a Type II non -concealed building attached wireless cellular facility. 3. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. The traffic generated from the facility will be minimal and will not have an impact on surrounding properties. 4. Noise generated from the new equipment cabinet will comply with the requirements of the Tukwila Noise Code. 5. The new WCF have been designed in a way to minimize visual impacts. 6. The proposed project is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this Type II non -concealed building attached wireless communications facility with no conditions. JR Page 5 of 5 03/10/2011 H:\Wireless Telecommunication Facilities \L11-003 Clearwire Doubletree_SR.doc eitti of J u11wiia Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: X Notice of Decision Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 21 day of _March in the year 2010 Sarah Telschow CHA Southcenter, LLC, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Project Name: Clearwire - SEA119 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE, Sarah Telschow Project Number: PL11-002 (L11-003) Mailing requested by: Jaimie Reavis Mailer's signature: 4 AT ` ` W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Page 1 of 2 Jaimie Reavis - RE: Clearwire - SEA119 Doubletree From: "Sarah Telschow" To: "Jaimie Reavis" Date: 03/09/2011 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Clearwire - SEA119 Doubletree March 9, 2011 Jamie: Please find the below requested justification: Clearwire reviewed the area for alternative locations in order to completely assess a less intrusive alternative to the proposed site modification. No viable alternatives were found. The existing building accommodates existing telecommunication facilities. Modifying the existing facility at this site location is the least intrusive option to the neighborhood. Per Table A in Section 18.58.050, the following types of facilities are preferred (in order of preference): • Transmission tower co -location • Adding antennas to an existing tower • Utility pole co -location • Concealed building attached In this immediate area, there are no existing transmission towers and/or existing towers. Additionally, the utility poles in the area do not provide adequate height. Due to the existing telecommunication facilities located on the roof and attached to the penthouse structure, Clearwire could not conceal the proposed modified one (1) new panel antenna and the replacement/upgrade of two (2) existing microwave dishes. The new proposed antenna and microwave replacement will be painted to match the existing building. Please see the enclosed photo simulation for more detailed information. Please let me know if more information is needed. Thanks Sarah Telschow, AICP Planner RealCom Associates LLC Office: (425) 274-4444 x114 Mobile: (206) 979-6268 Fax: (425) 274-4449 stelschow@realcomassoc.com file://C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\4D779396tuk-mai163O0-po l00168626D 111E5O... 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 2 • WEBSITE: www.realcomassoc.com From: Jaimie Reavis[mailto:jreavis@ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:28 PM To: Sarah Telschow Subject: Clearwire - SEA119 Doubletree Hi Sarah, I am working to finish up the staff report for your Wireless Communication Facilities permit. I just realized, however, that I will need some information from you that explains why a Type 2 Non -concealed building attached permit is needed instead of any of the more desirable Types listed in the hierarchy of facility types listed in Table A of TMC 18.58.050. The hierarchy of preferred WCF facility types outlined Table A moves from the most desirable facilities at the top of the list to the least desirable at the bottom. Can you provide some information to demonstrate that you have considered a Transmission tower co -location, the addition of antennas to an existing tower, a utility pole co -location, and a concealed building attached facility to come to the conclusion that those options are not possible and a non -concealed building attached facility is needed? Thank you, Jaimie Reavis Assistant Planner City of Tukwila ph: (206) 431-3659 file://C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\4D779396tuk-mai16300-po 100168626D 111E50... 03/21/2011 eiti °f J a1wiea Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda x Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 4 day of _February in the year 2011 Addresses on back of notice Project Name: Doubletree Rooftop, Wireless Telecommunications Facility Project Number: PL11-002, L11-003 Mailing requested by: Jaimie avis Mailer's signature: 7--) A- t°' �'/� W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRI$UTION.DOC -•.,r ••• + umvviia ..vucc Vl t11r1 II attu n Clearwire Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit—Doubletree Rooftop Location:16500 Southcenter Parkway, Doubletree Hotel, tax parcel #6437300020 File #'s: L11-003, PLI1-002 Applicant: Sarah Telschow, RealCom Associates Property Owners: CHA Southcenter LLC Project Planner: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, (206) 431-3659 or jreavis@ci.tukwila.wa.us Project Description: Modification of an existing rooftop telecommunications facility, including (1) the addition of one new flush -mounted antenna, (2) replacement of two microwave dishes, and (3) expansion of a radio equipment cabinet. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Com- munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:00pm on February 18, 2011. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3659. You are receiving this notice as an applicant, or a department or agency with jurisdiction for this project. City of Tukwila Notice of Application Clearwire Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit—Doubletree Rooftop Proj va ly, .r Location:16500 Southcenter Parkway, Doubletree Hotel, tax parcel #6437300020 File #'s: L11-003, PLI 1-002 Applicant: Sarah Telschow, RealCom Associates Property Owners: CHA Southcenter LLC Project Planner: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, (206) 431-3659 or jreavis@ci.tukwila.wa.us Project Description: Modification of an existing rooftop telecommunications facility, including (1) the addition of one new flush -mounted antenna, (2) replacement of two microwave dishes, and (3) expansion of a radio equipment cabinet. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Com- munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd # 100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on February 18, 2011. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206.431-3659. City of Tukwila Notice of Application Clearwire Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit—Doubletree Rool Location:16500 Southcenter Parkway, Doubletree 1 tax parcel #6437300020 File #'s: L11-003, PL11-002 Applicant: Sarah Telschow, RealCom Associates Property Owners: CHA Southcenter LLC Project Planner: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, (206) 431-3659 or jreavis@ci.tukwila.wa.us Project Description: Modification of an existing ro telecommunications facility, including (1) the additic one new flush -mounted antenna, (2) replacement of microwave dishes, and (3) expansion of a radio equir cabinet. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd # 100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter B Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:00pm on February 18, 2011. You may request a copy of al decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3659. You are receiving this notice as an applicant, or a department or agency with jurisdiction for this proji City of Tukwila Notice of Application Clearwire Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit—Doubletree Rooftt Location:16500 Southcenter Parkway, Doubletree Ho tax parcel #6437300020 File #'s: L11-003, PL11-002 Applicant: Sarah Telschow, RealCom Associates Property Owners: CHA Southcenter LLC Project Planner: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, (206) 431-3659 or jreavis@ci.tukwila.wa.us Project Description: Modification of an existing roof telecommunications facility, including (1) the addition one new flush -mounted antenna, (2) replacement of twi microwave dishes, and (3) expansion of a radio equipm cabinet. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Cc munity Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd # 100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blv Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on February 18, 2011. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3659. You are receiving this notice as an applicant, or a department or agency with jurisdiction for this project. You are receiving this notice as an applicant, or a department or agency with jurisdiction for this projec City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 SARAH TELSCHOW REALCOM ASSOCIATES 14432 SE EASTGATE WY STE 260 BELLEVUETUKWILA WA 98188 WA 98007 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 CHA SOUTHCENTER LLC 16500 SOUTHCENTER PY TUKWILA WA 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ACCOUNTING DIVISION 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A SEATTLETUKWILA WA 98188 WA 98104 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 DOUBLE TREE MANAGER 16500 SOUTHCENTER PY TUKWILA TUKWILA WA 98188 WA 98188 L, I, 00 3 AGENCY LABELS r7c_ ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division ( ) Dept of Ecology, SEPA ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist .\, Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION February 2, 2011 Ms. Sarah Telschow RealCom Associates 14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 260 Bellevue, WA 98007 Subject: Clearwire — SEA119 Tukwila Doubletree Wireless Telecommunications Facility Permit L11-003 (Wireless Permit Number) PL11-002 (Land Use Project File Number) Dear Ms. Telschow: Your application for a Wireless Telecommunications Facility permit is considered complete on February 2, 2011 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 431-3659 or ireavis@ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Jaimie Assistant Planner JR 02/01/2011 11:09:00 AM H:\Wireless Telecommunication Facilities \Complete_L11-003 Clearwire SEA119 Doubletree.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 To: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L11-003 (Wireless Permit) PL11-002 (Project Number) LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works sire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: Clearwire SEA 119 Doubletree Wireless Telecommunications Facility. Building Permit number is D11-004. Address: 16500 Southcenter Parkway Date transmitted: 2/01/2011 Response requested by: 2/15/2011 Staff coordinator: Jaimie Reavis Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 845 I - Cv`„�. "� 4p,vo'� ,J l i(o -Cvv, k C t� 1. y. {,,,. 4 S 4 L- 44. Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L11-003 (Wireless Permit) PL11-002 (Project Number) LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: Clearwire SEA 119 Doubletree Wireless Telecommunications Facility. Building Permit number is D11-004. Address: 16500 Southcenter Parkway Date transmitted: 2/01/2011 Response requested by: 2/15/2011 Staff coordinator: Jaimie Reavis Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) �4 LiD'I'1 LLI�I/1 Plan check ater Comments Di., f Update date: - L �— 0 prepared by: To: RECEIVED City of Tukwila ijg 012011 Department of Community Development TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number L11-003 (Wireless Permit) PL11-002 (Project Number) LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building la Planning °❑ Public Works Fire Dept. DI Police Dept. n Parks/Rec Project: Clearwire SEA 119 Doubletree Wireless Telecommunications Facility. Building Permit number is D11-004. Address: 16500 Southcenter Parkway Date transmitted: 2/01/2011 Response requested by: 2/15/2011 Staff coordinator: Jaimie Reavis Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) fhl ,k0/1-0 Plan check date: Comments Update date: LJ3 %!( prepared by: bggi4g 9 ACOUSTICS SSA Stewart • Alt Allaaua December 31, 2010 Ms. Diana Fenn Clearwire 4400 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 ACOUSTICS ACOUSTICS P.COUSTICS RECEIVED 1JAN 06 20111 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Acoustical Report — Clearwire WA-SEA119S10.5 Tukwila Doubletree Site: 16500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA 98188 L 11-003 Dear Diana, This report presents a noise survey performed in the immediate vicinity of the proposed Clearwire telecommunications facility at 16500 Southcenter Parkway in Tukwila, Washington. This noise survey extends from the proposed equipment to the nearest properties. The purpose of this report is to document the existing conditions and the impacts of the acoustical changes due to the proposed equipment. This report contains data on the existing and predicted noise environments, impact criteria and an evaluation of the predicted sound levels as they relate to the criteria. Ambient Conditions Existing ambient noise levels were measured on site with a Larson -Davis 820 sound level meter on December 30, 2010. Measurements were conducted as close to the proposed location as possible and the property lines in accordance with the State of Washington code for Maximum Environmental Noise Levels WAC 173-60-020. The average ambient noise level was 62 dBA, due to traffic noise on 1-5. The weather during the measurements was clear and the roads were dry. Code Requirements The site is located within the City of Tukwila Zoning jurisdiction on property with a TUC zoning designation. Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 8.22.020.5.a defines TUC as being within a Commercial district. The receiving properties are all zoned TUC. The proposed new equipment consists of equipment support cabinets, which are expected to run 24 hours a day. Under Tukwila Municipal Code 8.22.040 noise from equipment on a within a Commercial district is limited as follows: Commercial District Receiver: Noise is limited to 60 dBA 24 hours a day. SSA Acoustics, LLP 222 Etruria Street, Ste 100 Seattle, Washington 98109 t. 206.839.0819 f. 206.839.0824 Clearwire WA-SEA119S10.5 Tukwila Doubletree Predicted Equipment Sound Levels 24-Hour Operation Equipment The new equipment consists of single Clearwire IQ-4000VS Site Support Cabinet, which according to manufacturer data has a sound pressure level of 55 dBA noise level when measured at a distance of 5 feet. To predict equipment noise levels at the receiving properties, this survey used the methods established by ARI Standard 275-97. Application factors such as location, height, barriers, and reflective surfaces are accounted for in predicting the sound level at the nearest receivers. The proposed equipment is to be located on the roof of the existing building. The building has a 9'-6" parapet that surrounds the rooftop. The nearest receiving property is 105 feet west of the equipment location. The predicted sound level at the nearest property is shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 Application Factors and Predicted Noise Levels Proposed New Equipment Line Application Factor West 1 Combined Sound Pressure Level at 5 ft. (dBA), Lp1 55 2 Distance Factor (DF) Inverse -Square Law (Free Field): DF = 20log (d1/d2) -26 (105 ft) 3 Barrier effect of rooftop parapet -15 4 New Equipment Sound Pressure Level at Receiver, Lpr (Add lines 1 and 2) 14 As shown in Table 1, the combined sound pressure level from the proposed equipment cabinets at the nearest receiving property is 14 dBA which meets the 60 dBA code limit. Please contact us if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, SSA Acoustics, LLP Alan Burt, P.E. ASSOCIATE PARTNER ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT Page 2 RELCOM DOCUMENTATION TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 6, 2011 R CEIVED TO: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 JAN 0 6 2011 Tukwila, WA 98188 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: Sarali Telschow Planner RE: Clearwire - SEA119 Tukwila Doubletree Type 2 WCF Permit. Application THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN ENCLOSED: One (1) Application Checklist Five (5) WCF Application Form One (1) Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property One (1) NIER Report. One (1) Acoustical Report One (1) Project Description (includes site location analysis) Four (4) Photo Simulations and Screening Materials Description Two (2) Structural Calculations One (1) 11" x 17" CD's Five (5) Full Size CD's PURPOSE: If you have any questions and/or concerns about the enclosed materials, please feel free to contact me at work (425)274-4444, by cellular (206) 979-6268, or via e-mail stelschow@realcomassoc.com. Thank you. RealCom Associates, LLC 14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 260 * Bellevue, Washington 980070Z Phone (425) 274-4444 SR Fax (425) 274-4449 www.realcomassoc.com CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan(a�ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employee, agents,,engineers, contractor or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at j/ 5 2 i) J 6,6.4 (: � c-2 �ii � , ii,,otr • zej. for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. ( 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any Toss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at JGC.-/fc'cLJ i C (city), ✓ T (state), on ,20 /Qr?'I (�Zjr i- (Print Name) (� f/ / aC-) ?(`'yr'dEL 'g/t%J .Ay 7 Cheri<' }G . .2C ,— 7 77 _ (Phone Number (Address) (Signatur • On this day personally appeared before me 7CVN. Z L \ ("\ to me known to be the individu'aI who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS \PDAY OF L11-003 RECEIVED JAN 06 20111 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,20r NOTARY PUBLIC in and t\ir the State of Washington ��a ,rrrr' residing at \S =TQ� s a 1-- My Commission expires on f\-` �4.' \.\ 9 „at PROJECT DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION Clearwire is a wireless internet provider operating throughout the United States of America. Clearwire is licensed to operate in the United States by die Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Clearwire is currently upgrading its network in the King County area to make available improved wireless internet services to its subscribers. This proposal describes the scope of the proposed project by providing specific information regarding the project location, zoning, specifications, and required services. It is Clearwire's desire to work with the City of Tukwila to ensure tliat this project is consistent with local ordinances and zoning regulations while providing wireless coverage to Clearwire's customers and provide critical communication services for emergency, business, and personal use. Project Goals The goal of the Clearwire SEA119 Tukwila Doubletree is to provide expanded services. Clearwire intends to achieve these network goals consistent with all policies and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. Application Request Plan The applicant is requesting the following: • Type 2 Land Use Review • Commercial Building Permit. fteceiv° JAN 4 6 20111 pEVF,1.OPM T L11.003 Clcarw re SEA119 "Tukwila Doubletree Page 1 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Overview The applicant, Clearwire, proposes to modify an existing rooftop telecommunication facility at. 16500 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington (Parcel Number 6437300020). The proposed modification consists of the following: Add one (1) new panel antenna, replace/upgrade existing two (2) microwave dishes, and an equipment cabinet expansion. Please sec Sheet C01.1 and CO2.1 in the enclosed drawings for more detailed information. Facility Specifications ■ Antennas - Clearwire is proposing to add one (1) new flush mounted antenna to an existing rooftop. Please see Sheet C01.1 and CO2.1for additional information. ■ Color - The new proposed antenna and microwave replacement will be painted to match the existing building. Please see the enclosed photo simulation for more detailed information. ■ Facility Maintenance - The facility is generally serviced once a month. One (1) to two (2) employees are on site for an average of four (4) hours of maintenance checks. This check is typically for preventive maintenance purposes. In the event of a problem, a crew is dispatched to the site immediately. ■ Microwave Dishes - Clearwire is proposing to replace/upgrade existing two (2) microwave dishes. Please see Sheet. C01.1 and CO2.1for additional information. ■ Radio Equipment Expansion - The cabinet. expansion will increase the overall cabinet height by thirty inches (30"). There are no proposed changes to the existing batteries. Clearwire's equipment will meet all applicable noise standards. Cleanii e SEA119 Thkuil a Doubleiree Page 2 GENERAL SITE ANALYSIS Zoning General Plan Designation The site is zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). Clearwire's proposed telecommunication facility modification requires a Type 2 Land Ilse Review according to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.58.050: A. Applications will be reviewed based on the type of wireless communication facilities requested to be permitted. Each wireless communication facility requires the appropriate type of project permit review, as shown in Table A: TABLE A Type of Permit Required, Based on Type of Wireless Communication Facility Zoning(1) Type of Facility Residential Commercial industrial Transmission tower co -location Type 1 Type 1 Type 1 Adding antennas to an existing tower Type la) Type 1(V) Type 1 (2) Utility pole co -location Type 2 Type 2 Type 2 Concealed building attached Type 2(3) Type 2(3) Type 1 Non -concealed building attached Type 2 Type 2 Type 1 New tower or waiver request Type 4 Type 4 Type 4 (I) Zoning for any private/public property or right of way Residential — LIT MDR, or HDR. Commercial — C , MUCH, RCC, NCC, RC, RCJ TUC, C/LI or TVS. Industrial — LI, HI, MICA, or MICYH. (2) Provided the height of the tower does not increase and the square footage of the enclosure area does not increase. (3) An applicant may request to install a non - concealed building attached facility, under TMC Section 18.58.150. Clearrrire SEA119 7 ukwil t Doubletree Page 3 Accordingly, Clearwire is requesting the review and approval of a Type 2 Land Use Review and Commercial Building Permit approval. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) According to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.21C.0384: Application of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) to personal wireless services facilities. (1) Decisions pertaining to applications to site personal wireless service facilities arc not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), if those facilities meet the following requirements: (a) (i) The facility to be sited is a microcell and is to be attached to an existing structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school; or (ii) the f icility includes personal wireless service antennas, other than a microcell, and is to be attached to an existing structure (that may be an existing tower) that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school, and the existing structure to which it is to be attached is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone; or (iii) the siting project involves constructing a personal wireless service tower less than sixty leer in height that is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone; and (b) The project is not in a designated environmentally sensitive area; and (c) The project. does not consist of a series of actions: (i) Some of which are not categorically exempt; or (ii) that together may have a probable significant adverse environmental impact. (2) The department of ecology shall adopt. rules to create a categorical exemption for microcells and other personal wireless service facilities that meet the conditions set forth in subsection (1) of this section... "Microcell" means a wireless communication facility consisting of an antenna that is either: (i) Four feet in height and with an area of not more than five hundred eighty square inches; or (ii) if a tubular antenna, no more than four inches in diameter and no more than six leet in length. The proposed site modifications are located on an existing structure that is located on property zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) and the structure does not contain a residence and/or school. Therefore, the proposed site modification would be categorically exempt from SEPA review. Noise According to TMC 18.58.070: 1. Noise - Any facility that requires a generator or other device which will create noise must demonstrate compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". A noise report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted with any application to construct and operate a wireless communication facility that will have a generator or similar device. The City may require that the report be reviewed by a third party expert at the expense of the applicant.. Clearwire's proposed equipment will meet all applicable noise standards. Please see the enclosed Acoustical Study. Clearwire SEA119 Tukwila Doubletree Page 4 Business License Requirement According to TMC 18.58.070: 2. Business license requirement - Any person, corporation or entity that operates a wireless communication facility within the City shall have a valid business license issued annually by the City. Any person, corporation or other business entity which owns a tower also is required to obtain a business license on an annual basis. Clearwire has filed for a business license for this site location. Signage According to TMC 18.58.070: 3. Signage - Only safety signs or those mandated by other government entities may be located on wireless communication facilities. No other types of signs are permitted on wireless communication facilities. No signs will be on -site unless required by either the FCC and/or FAA. Parking According to TMC 18.58.070: 4. Puking - Any application must demonstrate that there is sufficient space for temporary parking for regular maintenance of the proposed facility. Existing on -site parking provides adequate parking for the existing facility. Finish According to TMC 18.58.070: 5. Finish - A tower shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or, subject to any applicable standards of the FAA or FCC, be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness. The antenna and microwave dishes will be painted to match the existing penthouse. Design According to TMC 18.58.070: 6. Design - The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities with the natural setting and built environment. The antenna and microwave dishes will be painted to match the existing penthouse. Clearwre HALM Tukwila Doubletree Page 5 Color According to TMC 18.58.070: 7. Color - All antennas and ancillauy facilities located on buildings or structures other than towers shall be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and ancillary facilities as visually unobtrusive as possible. The antenna and microwave dishes will be painted to match the existing penthouse. Lighting According to TMC 18.58.070: 8. Lighting- Towers shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA, FCC or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the reviewing authority shall review the lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding areas. No strobe lighting of any type is permitted on any lower. No lighting will be on -site. Advertising According to TMC 18.58.070: 9. Advertising - No advertising is permitted at wireless communication facility sites or on any ancillary structure or facilities equipment compound. No advertising is or will be on -site. Equipment Enclosure According to TMC 18.58.070: 10. Equipment Enclosure - Each applicant shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet at each site. However, this restriction shall not apply to enclosures located within an existing commercial, industrial, residential or institutional building. There arc no proposed changes to the equipment enclosure. Height According to TMC 18.58.100: 1. Height - The proposed facility must meet the height requlrelnellt of the applicable zoning category. 7iie antennas can qualify under. TMC Section 18.50.080, "Rooftop Appurtenances'; IT the antennas are located in a church spire, chimney or fake chimney, elevator tol4el;, mechanical equipment room, or other similar rooliop appurtenances usually requited t0 be placed on a Cleall4ir e SEA119 "f'ukr4lla Doubletr-ee Page 6 roof and not mter)ded lot -Truman occupancy. *Stand-alone antennas shall not qualify as rooftop appurtenances. According to TMC 18.28.080, the zone height. maximum is one hundred fifteen feet (115'). Clearwire is not. proposing to exceed the existing building height or the zone height. Please sec Sheet. CO2.1 for more detailed elevation information. Antenna Aesthetics According to TMC 18.58.100: 2. Antennas aesthetics - The antennas must be concealed from tiers by blending with the architectural style of the building. This could include steeple -like structures and parapet wa%is. The screening must be made out of the salve material and be the same color as the building: Antennas shall be panted to match the color scheme ofthe building-(s). The antenna and microwave dishes will be painted to match the existing penthouse. Please see the enclosed Photo Simulations for more detailed information. Feed Lines and Coaxial Cables According to TMC 18.58.100: 3. Feed lines and coaxial cables - Feed lines and cables should be located below the parapet of the rooftop. The feed lines and coaxial cables will be concealed from view. Cabinet Equipment According to TMC 18.58.100: 4. Cabinet equipment - If cabinet equipment cannot be located milli]] the building' where the wireless communication facilities Hill be located, then the City's first preference is to locate the equipment on the rooftop of the building. If the equipment can be screened by placing the equipment below the parapet walls, no additional screening- is required. If screening is required, then the proposed screening must be consistent with the existing building ill terms of color, style, architectural style and material If the cabinet equipment is to be located on the ground, the equipment must be fenced Hid' a 6-Ibot- tall fence, and materials shall be used to screen the equipment from weri: Barbed wre may be used in the TVS, LI, HI, MIC/L, and MIC/H zones. The cabinet expansion will increase the overall cabinet height. by thirty inches (30"). Cleairrii e SEA 119 Tukwila Doubletree Page 7 Setbacks According to TMC 18.58.100: Setbacks - The proposed wireless comrnmrieatiorn facilities lacili/J' must meet the setback of the applicable zoning category where the Iacility is to be located. The proposed antennas and equipment. will meet all applicable setbacks. Please sec Sheet. C0.1. Existing Use The subject area accommodates an existing office building and telecommunication facilities. Access/Circulation The site will be accessed by the existing right of entry. There are no traffic impacts associated with these types of facilities as they are unmanned and require infrequent maintenance. Federal Requirements Clearwire's proposed telecommunication facility modification will meet or exceed current standards and regulations of the FAA, the FCC, and any other agency of the Federal government with the authority to regulate towers and antennas. Clearwire's site will conform to all FAA/FCC regulations, and because the maximum ERP is less than two thousand (2,000) watts and/or the height of the facility is greater than ten meters (10m), an environmental evaluation of radio frequency emissions is exempted per CFR Title 47 Part 24, Subpart E. Clearwire has a license from the FCC to provide wireless services throughout Washington State. Clear wire SEA119 Tukwila Doubletr-ee Page 8 NON -IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS & ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION Clearw re wireless broadband SITE NUMBER: WA-SEA119S10.5 SITE NAME: Tukwila Doubletree SITE ADDRESS: 16500 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 DATE: December 28, 2010 PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80th Ave NE Marysville, WA 98270 (206) 851-1106 PROJECT The proposed Clearwire project consists of a WCF (Wireless Communications Facility) located on a building rooftop at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA 98188, King County parcel 6437300020. The planned improvements include panel and microwave antennas mounted the building penthouse with existing wireless antennas and radio equipment also on the rooftop. EQUIPMENT Type of Service: Broadband Wireless Internet Antennas: Kathrein 840 10054 Radiowaves HP3-18 Maximum Power: (46 dBm EIRP) Antenna Rad Center: 82'-9" AGL (lowest) CALCULATIONS Calculations for RF power densities near ground level are based on the "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65" Edition 97-01, August 1997 issued by the Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. Section 2 of OET Bulletin 65 demonstrates that "for a truly worst -case prediction of power density at or near the surface, such as at ground -level or on a rooftop, 100% reflection of incoming radiation can be assumed, resulting in a potential doubling of predicted field strength and a four -fold increase in (far field equivalent) power density". Therefore the following equation is used: S = EIRP/TrR2 Where S = power density (mW/cm2), EIRP = equivalent isotropically radiated power and R = distance to the center of the radiation antenna (cm) Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Power Exposure) calculations using the above referenced formula and the antenna manufacturer vertical pattern information using a conservative 20 dB loss below main lobe. The calculations show that the maximum MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) at the base of the building and the power density is 0.002869 mW/cm2 with power level at an assumed 3,000 watts. This is 0.2869% of the MPE limit for the general population/uncontrolled exposure of 1.0 mW/cm2 as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A for the Clearwire frequency range. OTHER CARRIERS The following are examples of wireless carriers providing service in King County: ESMR 851-866 Mhz Nextel Cellular 869-894 Mhz AT&T, Verizon PCS > 1800 Mhz Sprint, T-Mobile, AT&T Nextel facilities will have potentially higher power levels than cellular or PCS facilities. In order to develop a "worst case prediction", it is assumed that Nextel facilities are on the rooftop with maximum effective radiated power (ERP) levels of 3,000 watts per sector verses 2,000 watts or less for cellular or PCS facilities. Wireless facility antennas are highly directional and project the majority of the RF energy horizontally. Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Power Exposure) calculations using the referenced power density formula. These calculations assume that the vertical patterns of the antennas suppress the ERP by 20dbB towards the antenna base. The calculations show that the maximum total MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) at the base of the building is 0.002641 mW/cm2 with the carriers operating at a total ERP of 3,000 watts per sector. This is 0.4658% of the MPE limit for the general population/uncontrolled exposure of 0.567 mW/cm2 for the lowest Nextel frequency (851/1500) as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A. COLOCATED FACILITIES TOTAL MPE The combined MPE for the Verizon Wireless antennas and the existing carriers using "worst case" calculations is: 0.002869 mW/cm2 + 0.002641 mW/cm2 = 0.00551 mW/cm2 Total MPE. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Routine environmental evaluation is required if a PCS broadband facility with building mounted antennas has a total power of all channels in any given sector greater than 2,000W ERP as referenced in "Table 2 Transmitters, Facilities and Operations subject to Routine environmental Evaluation" of Bulletin 65. For the proposed facility, the total power in a given sector is less than 2,000 W ERP, therefore, the WCF is categorically exempt from requirement for routine environmental processing. FCC COMPLIANCE The general population/uncontrolled exposure near the building, including persons at ground level, surrounding properties, inside and on existing structures will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst case" scenario, which is a small fraction of the MPE limit. Only trained persons will be allowed to rooftop for maintenance operations. Clearwire and/or its contractors will provide training to make the employees fully aware of the potential for RF exposure occupational training and they can exercise control over their exposure that is within the occupational/controlled limits. CONCLUSIONS Based on calculations, the proposed WCF will comply with current FCC and county guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. All representations contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge. EXHIBITS • MPE Calculations • Antenna Data Sheets • WCF Location Map Effective tower height assumes a person 6 ft tall. I 82.75 height (ft) I WA-SEA199S10.5 Tukwila Doubletree MPE Calculations 2.87E-03 0.002869 max power density in mW/cm2 0.2869% percentage of standard tower height, Note: 1.0 mW/cm2 is 100% of allowable standard for Clearwire frequency hypotenuse horiz. Dist., x main beam effective radiation tower ERP ERP Power at point x center height minor lobe dB below horiz. disthyptonuse hypotenuse hypotenuse main lobe main lobe minor lobe minor lobe minor lobe at ground level (feet), y (feet), y angle main lobe x length (feet) length (km) length (cm) (watts) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP (mW) mW/cm^2 82.75 76.75 90 20 0.000 76.750 0.023 2339.340 3000 64.77 44.77 46.93 49331.15 TOTAL I 2.87E-03 I I 2.87E-03 Effective tower height assumes a person 6 ft tall. 86 height (ft) WA-SEA0449 Seattle Fabrics Other Carriers MPE Calculations 2.64E-03 0.002641 max power density in mW/cm2 0.4658 percentage of standard tower height, Note: 0.567 mW/cm2 is 100% of allowable standard for lowest Nextel frequency horiz. Dist., x main beam effective radiation tower ERP ERP Power at point x center height minor lobe dB below horiz. dist. hyptonuse hypotenuse hypotenuse main lobe main lobe minor lobe minor lobe minor lobe at ground level (feet), y (feet), y angle main lobe x length (feet) length (km) length (cm) (watts) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP (mW) mW/cmx2 86 80 90 20 0.000 80.000 0.024 2438.400 3000 64.77 44.77 46.93 49331.15 TOTAL 2.64E-03 I I 2.64E-03 I Kathrein Scala's XX-polarized adjustable electrical downtilt antennas offer the carrier the ability to tailor sites for optimum performance. Using variable downtllt, only a few models need be procured to accommodate the needs of widely varying conditions. Remotely controlled downtilt is available as a retrofitable option. • 0-10° electrical downtilt range. • DC Grounded metallic parts for impulse suppression. • No moving electrical connections. • Optional remote downtilt control. Specifications: Frequency range 2496-2690 MHz Gain 2 x 16 dBi Impedance 50 ohms VSWR < 1.5:1 Intermodulation (2x20w) IM3:< -150 dBc Polarization +45° and -45° Front4o-back ratio >23 dB typical Maximum input power 300 watts (at 50°C) +45° and -45° polarization 87 degrees at midband (half power) horizontal beamwldth +45° and -45° polarization vertical beamwldth 7 degrees at midband (half power) Electrical downtilt continously adjustable 0-10 degrees Connector 4 x 7-16 DIN female Sidelobe suppression for first sidelobe above horizon 0° 4° 8° 10° 15 15 15 15 dB (typical) Null fill > -1 dBi to 12° below horizon (typical) (17 dB below 16 dBi main beam Isolation >30 dB Weight 30 Ib (13.6 kg) Dimensions 42 x 12.7 x 2.8 inches (1067x323x71 mm) Equivalent flat plate area 4.8 ft2 (0.45 m2) Wind survival rating' 120 mph (200 kph) Shipping dimensions 48 x 13.3 x 5.1 inches (1220 x 337 x 130 mm) Shipping weight 34 Ib (15.4 kg) Mounting Fixed and tilt -mount options are available for 2 to 5.7 Inch (50 to 145 mm) OD masts. See reverse for order Information. • Mechanical design is based on environmental conditions as stipulated In EIA-222-F (June 1996) and/or ETS 300 019-1-4 which include the static mechanical load imposed on an antenna by wind at maximum velocity. See the Engineering Section of the catalog for further details. 11098-A leak Gleoil w,�n OP WA 41 we Horizontal pattern *45°- polarization 0° electrical downtilt b. Horizontal pattern *45°- polarization 5° electrical downtilt 01104. 44 OW ~i����`'w�IM I rW 11IA in a 80 TO Po m Horizontal pattern *45°- polarization 10° electrical downtilt 840 10054 87° XX-pol Panel Antenna 2496-2690 MHz 40 if* vo vr►�� rljn�,��Oe itv ORO Vertical pattern *45°- polarization 0° electrical downtilt Vertical patient s45°- polarization 5° electrical downtilt 7�i��l�� 11D few�j MrM Vertical pattem *45°- polarization 10° electrical downtilt Kathrein inc., Scala Division Post Office Box 4580 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Phone: (541) 779-6500 Fax: (541) 779-3991 Emaih communications@kathrein.com Internet www.kathrein-scala.com KATH H_E1 SCALA DIVISION Mounting Options: Model Description 2 x 738 546 Mounting Kit for 2 to 4.6 inch (50 to 115 mm) OD mast. 850 10013 Till Kit for use with the 2 x 738 546 mounting kit 0-15 degrees downtilt angle. Order Information: Model Description 840 10054 Antenna with 7-16 DIN connectors 840 10054 87° XX-pol Panel Antenna 2496-2690 MHz 2.625 inches ± 0.125 (68 mm * 4) 42 inches (1067 mm) 44.1 inches (1120 mm) 45.3 Inches (1151 mm) T 2.8 inches (71 mm) 12.7 inches (323 mm) t 3.9 inches (98 mm) I RCU I 2496-2690 Left l Right 2496-2690 l 1113 RCU 1 Layout of interface All specifications are subject to change without notice.The latest specifications are available at www.kathrein-scala.com. Kathrein Inc., Scala Division Post Office Box 4580 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Phone: (541) 779-6500 Fax (541) 779-3991 Email: communications@kathrein.com Internet www.kathrein-scala.com RADIOWAVES 18 GHz (17.7 - 19.7) HIGH-PERFORMANCE MICROWAVE ANTENNAS FEATURES • Antenna diameters • 1' (30 cm) • 1.5(45 cm) • 2' (60 cm) • 3' (90 cm) • 4' (120 cm) • Antenna weights • 117 lbs. (7.7 kg) • 1.5' 19 lbs. (8.6 kg) • 2' 27 lbs. (12.2 kg) • 3' 50 lbs. (22.5 kg) • 4' 85 lbs. (38.3 kg) • HP models: high-performance, plane polarized • HPD models: dual polarized • IEC or EIA flanges available • Direct mounting for RF units available • Ease of installation: antennas shipped completely assembled, minimal mount required • Planar radomes standard with high-performance model • Rugged and lightweight cast aluminum mount with fine adjustment for both azimuth and elevation • Compact size, due to Radio Waves innovative feed design • Standard white; other colors and/or logos available on request • Corrosive resistant: coated aluminum, hot dipped galvanized steel and stainless steel • Three year warranty 17.7 - 19.7 GHz ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS (typical performance)* Model Number Diameter ft (cm) Gain, dBi Beamwidth Low Mid High Degrees, 3dB X Pol. Disc., dB FIB VSWR Max. Ratio, dB (R.L., dB) HPLP1-18 HPLP1.5-18 HP2-18 HP3-18 HP4-18 1 (30) 1.5 (45) 2 (60) 3 (90) 4 (120) Plane Polarized 33.5 34.0 34.4 3.0 35.7 36.2 36.7 2.5 38.2 38.6 39.0 2.0 41.6 42.0 42.4 1.3 44.1 44.5 44.9 1.0 Dual Polarized HPLPD1-18 1 (30) 33.3 33.8 34.2 3.0 HPLPD1.5-18 1.5 (45) 35.5 36.0 36.5 2.5 HPD2-18 2 (60) 38.0 38.4 38.8 2.0 HPD3-18 3 (90) 41.4 41.8 42.2 1.3 HPD4-18 4 (120) 43.8 44.3 44.7 1.0 * All specifications subject to change without notice. For regulatory compliances, contact Radio Waves. 30 53 30 58 30 66 30 69 30 72 1.4:1 (15.5) 1.4:1 (15.5) 1.4:1 (15.5) 1.4:1 (15.5) 1.4:1 (15.5) 30 53 1.4:1 (15.5) 30 58 1.41 (15.5) 30 66 1.4:1 (15.5) 30 69 1.41 (15.5) 30 72 1.4:1 (15.5) Radio Waves, Inc. http://www.radiowavesinc.com 6VNNYILN . ]NI ell I WA-SEA119S10.5 Tukwilla Doubletree 1 i..efto 1 c tI-St, J' S=1-60th7St -(S 16 -1158th-St-,' =S16tI 2nd t� Crestview Park p. SA\4tFFSt — — 5v`'F06th St j[. �ts$th St 10.0 ,r > Mll_ � S 172nd St� cfq ��co � V F= c 3—�Q5-�3r�=�572nd(-tt Ia) o \� S 73th-St F� S 7Btf ` h 1 I �� 1 I .e tt rCryi,i'4 �t prangco $ Park, dcc n � � rn JL L L��u J U L152r1iFSt' a WY �-1 Bak BIJ,d—i a1NA,SIJ11�19510"�S�Tukwflla�Do "" 47.45428°N 122,26064°W 1l I Strandei~Bivd,=--� Boeing Longacres Industrial Park Renton _ O 0 mi 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Copyright © and (P) 1988-2006 Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com/streets/ Portions © 1990-2006 InstallShield Software Corporation. All rights reserved. Certain mapping and direction data © 2005 NAVTEQ. All rights reserved. The Data for areas of Canada includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities, including: © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, © Queen's Printer for Ontario. NAVTEQ and NAVTEQ ON BOARD are trademarks of NAVTEQ. © 2005 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. Tele Atlas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Atlas, Inc. 1 1.2 4C,,CORNERAIWE ENGINEERING, I N C. Ly17L • slki L/l R,11. •.q I lL) 16928 Woodinvil le-Rcdn Woodinville. WA 98072 Email: cei a cornerstone-engr.coni Web: \\ wn . cornerstone-engr.com 1i. Suite 210 Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 Structural Calculations For Antenna and Microwave Dishes Installation on Existing Penthouse Walls and Equipment Cabinet Installation on Existing Platform Prepared By: Checked By: Prepared Date: CEI Project No.: Clearw're° Site Name: Tukwila Doubletree Site Number: WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 Southcenter Pkwy Tukwila, WA 98188 King County Khoa K. Nguyen, P.E. Mark W. Olson, P.E. November 8, 2010 10-49057 EXPIRES: 02/15/ (24 Comprehensive Design Solutions for Your Project Success! Pi ject: WA-SEA-119S10.5 Client: Clearwire CEI No.: 10-49057 Date: November 8, 2010 Prepared By: K. Nguyen Page I. Scope of Work Provide structural design for the proposed addition of Clearwire US LLC telecommunications antenna/microwave equipment within the existing penthouse walls and the addition of an equipment cabinet will be placed on existing steel platform atop a roof. The project is located at 16500 Southcenter Pkway in the city of Tukwila, King County, WA. The proposed loads of the additional antenna/microwave equipment within the existing penthouse transfer through the supporting load bearing penthouse walls, loads then transfer into the foundation and soil. The proposed loads of the equipment transfer into the existing steel platform into the existing beams of the building. All the loads then transfer from the column into the foundation and into the soil. The information in this report summarizes the requirements for construction of structural elements for the proposed design in conformance with the 2009 International Building Code (IBC). Unless noted otherwise, all means and methods used shall be in keeping with good and generally accepted construction practices and all prescriptive design requirements of the 2009 IBC. II. Analysis Results As requested, we have evaluated the structural stability of the proposed additional loading for structural code compliance. This analysis derives its applied loads from minimum 85 mph basic wind speed (3- second gust), Exposure "B". Since soil properties are not available, seismic site class "D" was conservatively used for this analysis per 2009 IBC (Section 16). III. Conclusions and Recommendations The existing penthouse walls are structurally adequate to support the proposed additional loading of the antenna/microwave equipment. The existing platform and existing beam will be structurally adequate to support the proposed loading of the additional equipment cabinet. Please refer to the following calculations as well as the supporting drawings provided for the design of the equipment cabinet replacement General contractor shall verify all existing dimensions, member sizes and conditions prior to commencing any work. All dimensions of existing condition shown on the calculation are intended as guidelines only and must be verified in field. Any discrepancies shall be called to the attention of the architect or engineer and shall be resolved before proceeding with the work. Contractor shall provide temporary bracing for the structure and structural components until all final connections have been completed in accordance with the plans. IV. Loads/Design Criteria: (2009 IBC & ASCE 7-05) Please refer to the following calculations 1. Seismic — 2. Wind — Ss = 1.421g, Si = 0.486g, Site Class D, I = 1.0 Sps = 0.947g, Sp, = 0.491g, SDC "D" Wind Speed (V3s) = 85 mph, Exposure "B", I = 1.0, Topographic Factor = 1.0 16928 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE. Suite 210 Woodinville. WA 98072 Email: cei4i;cornnerstone-engr.com Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 11/03/2010 MSRMaps: Print Send To Printer Back To MSR Map. Change to 11x17 Print Size Rem , —,id Lines Change to Landscape KIESGS Tukwila, Washington, United States 13 Jun 2002 :122W 15'54" 122W 15'44" :122W 15'35" $422,26501 t•122.26235 422.25970 400.0 55 600.0 55 80_0.0 4 7 N 2 7` 2 5� ���.:m� °� a ,,. ,�a, a' i''' 7N�2 7 2 5" 47.45689 ra 7 4S 685 5,256,200.0 56,200.0 47N27'1I 47,45509 5,256,000.0 47N 27' 1: 47.45329 5,255,800,0 47N 27' 051122W 15' S4 47.45149,-122.26508 5,2 5 5,6 00.0i5 5 5,400.0 m SO,W 100, 50/ 180' 15 © 2010 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement 722W 15'45 4122.26243 55,600.0 7N 2718" 7.45505 6,000.0 5 tagea n� ale -Pee say SoutiicerAter Pkivy Tuk im(ta , U/A 98 I SS 7N27'12 7.45325 0.0 :47N 27705" 47.45145 :5,255,600.0 :122W 15'35" 122.25978 .1555,800.0 Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey mcrmanc rnm/nrintimano acnx7T=4Pc 1/1 ECORNENE ENGINEERING, I N C. C1171 ♦.v1R1 L7l R11 ♦.q'RI I 16928 Woodin\ Hie-RednNI) .E. Suite 210 Woodinville. WA 98072 Email: cei'n cornerstone-engr.com Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Conterminous 48 States 2005 ASCE 7 Standard Latitude = 47.454278 Longitude =-122.260639 Spectral Response Accelerations Ss and S1 Ss and S1 = Mapped Spectral Acceleration Values Site Class B - Fa = 1.0 ,Fv = 1.0 Data are based on a 0.05000000074505806 deg grid spacing Period Sa (sec) (g) 0.2 1.421 (Ss, Site Class B) 1.0 0.486 (S1, Site Class B) Conterminous 48 States 2005 ASCE 7 Standard Latitude = 47.454278 Longitude =-122.260639 Spectral Response Accelerations SMs and SM1 SMs = Fa x Ss and SM1 = Fv x S1 Site Class D - Fa = 1.0 ,Fv = 1.514 Period Sa (sec) (g) 0.2 1.421 (SMs, Site Class D) 1.0 0.736 (SM1, Site Class D) Conterminous 48 States 2005 ASCE 7 Standard Latitude = 47.454278 Longitude =-122.260639 Design Spectral Response Accelerations SDs and SD1 SDs =2/3x SMs and SD1 = 2/3 x SM1 Site Class D - Fa = 1.0 ,Fv = 1.514 Period Sa (sec) (g) 0.2 0.947 (SDs, Site Class D) 1.0 0.491 (SD1, Site Class D) Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 Clearwre® Protect Name: Tukwila Doubletree Site # WA-SEA119S10.5 Location: 16500 Southcenter Pkwy Tukwila, WA 98188 King County Comprehensive Design Solutions for Your Project Success! EiICDRNEFUSrDNE ENGINEERING, INC. Site Name: Tukwila Doubletree Client: Clearwire CEI No.: 10-49057 By: K. Nguyen Date: 11/03/10 Subject: Lateral Load Design Calculation Seismic Load Calculation for Components and System (Reference: IBC 2009, Section 1613 & ASCE 7-05, Chapter 13.0, ICBO Seismic Design Parameters 3.10) Seismic Force: 0.2s Spectral Response Acceleration, Site Class B, SS 1.0s Spectral Response Acceleration, Site Class B, Si Site Class Seismic Use Group = Standard -Occupancy Buildings Site Coefficient per Ss & Site Class, Fa Site Coefficient per Si & Site Class, F„ SMS = FaSs SM1 = F„ S, Sips = 2/3 SMS SD1 = 2/3 SM1 Seismic Design Category per SDS (Per ASCE 7-05, Chapter 13.0) Component amplification factor, ap Component Importance factor, Ip Component operating weight, Wp Component response modification factor, Rp Height in structure at point of attachment of component, z Average roof height of structure, h Seismic Design Force, Fp 1.421 (IBC 09, Figure 1613.5(1)) 0.486 (IBC 09, Figure 1613.5(2)) D (IBC 09, Table 1613.5.2) = I 1.00 (IBC 09 Table 1613.5.3(1)) = 1.51 (IBC 09 Table 1613.5.3(2)) = 1.421 (IBC 09, Eq 16.-37) 0.736 (IBC 09, Eq 16.-38) 0.947 0.491 D (IBC 09, Eq 16.-39) (IBC 09, Eq 16.-40) = 1 (ASCE 7-05, Table 13.6-1) = 1 (ASCE 7-05, Section 13.1.3) Wp (lb) 2.5 (ASCE 7-05, Table 13.6-1) = 100 (ft) 100 (ft) 0.4aPSDSWp (1+2z/h) Rp/Ip (Eq. 13.3-1) Max. seismic design force, Fpmax = 1.6SDSIpWp (Eq. 13.3-2) Min. seismic design force, Fpmin = 0.3SDSIpWp (Eq. 13.3-3) Min. seismic design force, Fpmin = 0.28 Wp Max. seismic design force, Fpmax = 1.52 Wp Seismic Design Force, Fp = 0.45 Wp (No one third stress increase allowed) 16928 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE, #210 Woodinville, WA 98072 E-mail: cei@cornerstone-engr.com Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Tel: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 EcoPLNEFs1roNE G ENGINEERIN Wind Velocity Pressure: Site Name: Tukwila Doubletree Client: Clearwire CEI No.: 10-49057 By: K. Nguyen Date: 11/03/10 Subject: Lateral Load Design Calculation Wind Load Calculation for Other Structure (Reference: IBC 2009, Section 1609 & ASCE 7-05, Chapter 6.0) Basic Wind Speed, Vas, (mph) Exposure Category Building Category Wind Load Importance Factor, Ir, Velocity pressure exposure coefficient, KZ Topographic Factor, lc Wind Directionality Factor, Kd Velocity Pressure, qZ, (Ib/ft2) = 85 (ASCE 7-05, Figure 6-1) = B (ASCE 7-05, Section 6.5.6) II (IBC 09 Table 1604.5) = 1.00 (ASCE 7-05, Table 6-1) 0.99 (ASCE 7-05, Table 6-3) = 1.0 (ASCE 7-05, Figure 6-4). 0.85 (ASCE 7-05, Table 6-4). = 0.00256KZKZtKdV21W (ASCE 7-05, Eq. 6-15) 15.56 (ASCE 7-05, Section 6.5.10) Design Wind Load (Open Buildings & Other Structure) Gust effect factor, G Net force coefficient, Cff Rooftop Equipment Increase, Cf2 Projected area normal to the wind, Af, (ft2) Design Wind Loads, F, (Ib/ft) _ Height Z, (ft) Exposure B Case 1 Case 2 0-15 0.70 0.57 20 0.70 0.62 25 0.70 0.66 30 0.70 0.70 40 0.76 0.76 50 0.81 0.81 60 0.85 0.85 70 0.89 0.89 80 0.93 0.93 90 0.96 0.96 100 0.99 0.99 140 1.09 1.09 250 1.28 1.28 0.85 1.3 1.9 Af gZGC fAf Ibs 317 psf (Af) (ASCE 7-05, Section 6.5.8) (ASCE 7-05, Figure 6-20-23) (ASCE 7-05, Section 6.5.15.1) Velocity Pressure (qZ) Case 1 Case 2 11.01 8.96 11.01 9.75 11.01 10.38 11.01 11.01 11.95 11.95 12.73 12.73 13.36 13.36 13.99 13.99 14.62 14.62 15.09 15.09 15.56 15.56 17.14 17.14 20.12 20.12 16928 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE, #210 Woodinville, WA 98072 E-mail: cei@cornerstone-engr.com Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Tel: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 Priject: WA-SEA-l19S10.5 Client: Clearwire CEI No.: 10-49057 jDate: November 8, 2010 Prepared By: K. Nguyen Page Analysis of Additional Cabinet on Existing Platform 16928 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE. Suite 210 Woodinville. WA 98072 Email: cei(Tcornerstone-engr.com Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-73(16 Fax: (425) 487-1734 project ocation E.COiRNEFls1roNE• ENGINEERING, I N C. by client date checked date sheet no. CEI job no. EQu/P/IIE-NT C/IB//UET 11.OD/Tio,U ON TOP &x/sr/,v0 PLA-rF CAB//VET SPEC/El C,4T/ON 1�l/YJENS/D,U : 26''x 26 "x a5„ '4Aho I:UE/ft % /0a2# DEs,6-,v LOADS L/si v6- L,FFD SE's/WC Sots = 0.947 E� = sts, kip= O,lS9'(c4) v 0,/89k EH E = 0,45 (ww) EH = o, 450 k W/N0 9� = 32..7 PSF Fw = % , A = 32, 7 P.-F (261; ar 5/444.;;/i2) Fw = 0.393 k De-TERM/NE EQU/PMENT C,4B/IJET ,4rno, Con/13/N/ A4 L RFD LOAD C,ISas 4, /,2,0 + /,6w 5, /,2'0 + 1, D E 6. 0,9D t 1,6 w ✓ ,8y /Nspec Tio U Lo,9.D C4 sEs i6 07 7. 0,9 D + / 0 E ✓ CONTROL. TIE DES/ 4J sheet no. ECDRNERS1rONE ENGINEERING, I N C. project by location date client checked date CEI job no. ;0= V- Fw oR EH V= Fw OREy 2M'0 = 34(Fw oREN)— /0,75(D+E„) -21,5T °RN T 34(Fw PE — / n, 75(pf c ) 21, 5 COMB/NA770N LOU CASE #6 0,9 b # VV = 1.6 (0,3934) = 0,629L 7- _ 34 (o,2) - /0, 75 (0, 9 x 1,09 u� 21,5„ T - 0, 594 L 26" t Ev 21, 5'I G T COMBINATati Logo CASE # 7 (0,9D t 1,oE> Vu = I, o (0450k) = 0,450k 34 (o,4-s0 9 - / 0-7510, 9 x /) - (Mx 0,1 e9 93 2/, 5 Tu = 0, 3 5 to k = 0, 6 29 L (*) 4ovOiots o 0, 157 i /dte Tu = 0, 544 (2) AV o s 0, 2 72:19,4, come 665" Wipe - project by sheet no. __� CORNERS -TONE E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. location 1 date client 1 checked date CEI job no. Thy % A3O-7 6Ot Ts To CO n Eer Egt,,,PMENT C.4BMET To PMTFaern ST1C rQe..E 0 F� = / S. 0 'S/ AND 0 Ft = 33, g &..si A = 7t r2 = TZ (0,251/)1 0,196 �N2 Vrnax //+ 0,/5 7 470,196 /,1) Z. Fnv /8, o fit. 0/04-5 </,o Fv c�k .�t TR .x 0,272 /O,/9 /dUt- _ = 0,041 </.o ox. t OF t 33.8 Kst, _-� use (4) , O 4307 B7LTS To FASTEN Ea( iPN?E,Jr CAS I N ET To Ex/ST/Al & P61-TFAet71 ST I crzf e6 STRUCTURAL FRAMING SUPPORT POST TYP. 4 PLCS CONCRETE COLUMN BELOW EXISTING CONCRETE COLUMN BELOW 1.l. EXISTING WALL BELOW W8xt0 original CAD drawing from Seo-072 KNArchive Quest this drawing was saved 10-49057 0I I Uon folder PCS EQUIPMENT FRAME SUPPORT 3/4" X 1/8' O 13/18' 0.C. GALV. STEEL GRATING W/ STD. SADDLE CUP FASTENERS �90 PCS EQUIPMENT SKIP TO BE PLACED ON TOP,i^� SCALE: 1/4' = sheet no. ECORNEFIS1rDNE ENGINEERING, I N C. project by location date client checked date CEI job no. VE/e/F% EV_ST/NG- /LATFO,em ST,eleCTIeeE EX/S 7-/A)) E& u/P/ *uT 6 904- PROf OSED /090 (trot_ /0 f5F W LL = 40 PSF / (E) We x 2/ x /4 / l7 G'i = /OP5F (2,5) = 25 PE = 69c'% 343# PP = / % = sots# (6)1k13)(10 x 141-0 1/0p = 10PSF (/7s) 4-0 PsF = 707 (E) WBxld PE Pe project by sheet no. CORNER51rONE _• ENGINEERING, I N C. location date client checked date CEI job no. 5, (E) W//Ox 22x /7 75' P P, Pg (E) 01/Ox 22_ Pg Ac.i- bosTIA) /°L117-F0,e/11 STRucTute& SrEEL 4E4/h5 A,pE ARC ADEau,4TE TO Sa/°, er /1-7'E Fx/sriuAuo PCPosCO EQuIPM air C4arivErs Job # EcDFusJEs1rONE E N G I N E E i( f N G, I N C. Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Printed: 4 NOV 2010. 1:59Ph9 Steel Beam Design Lic. # : KW-06006053 Description : 4.3 3.2 2.1 1.1 BEAM... . 1,5 0.8 BEAM-.->m 30 -0.7 -1.4 BEAM---» -0.018 -0.036 -0.054 -0.072 1. (E) W8x21 x 14'-0" ENERCALC, INC. 1983.2009, Ver: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 133 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 Distance (ft) l Ove•eII MAN“n.n E+vela De ■ +C• ■ aDal+H f +D+L•+H f +D+D.7501•+D.7SDl+H 8.33 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 8.33 Distance (ft) Ove•ell MA%:•.I.n E.velame ■ +D ■ +Dal+H l +D+L.+H ■ +D+D.7SDl.+D.7SOl+H 9 73 11.13 9)♦ 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 8.33 Distance (ft) Ove,e 11 MA3:n.n Envelope ■ DO.Iy ■ l O.ly • D+I+S ■ Dal+l. 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 Job # 41C,C0RNErRS'ICONE C N (' 1 N E E R I N C. I N C. Steel Beam Design Lic. # : KW-06006053 Description : 2. (E) W8x10 x 14'-0" Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Beam Bracing : Completely Unbraced Bending Axis : Major Axis Bending Load Combination 2006 IBC & ASCE 7-05 Applied Loads Beam self weight calculated and added to loads Loads on all spans... W8x10 Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Printed. 4 NOV 2010. 2-.00P11 ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2009, Ver: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. Calculations per IBC 2006, CBC 2007, 13th AISC Fy : Steel Yield : 36.0 ksi E: Modulus : 29,000.0 ksi Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Uniform Load on ALL spans : D = 0.0180, L = 0.070 k/ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 fi Load(s) for Span Number 1 Point Load : D = 0.50 k 1.50 ft, (Pp) Point Load : D = 0.3450 k 12.50 ft, (Pe) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = 0.426 : 1 Section used for this span W8X10 Mu : Applied 3.038 k-ft Mn / Omega : Allowable 7.131 k-ft Load Combination +D+L+H Location of maximum on span 6.860ft Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Maximum Deflection Max Downward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Upward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection 0.068 0.000 0.126 0.000 in in in in Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = Section used for this span Vu : Applied Vn/Omega : Allowable Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs Ratio = Ratio = Ratio = Ratio = Overall Maximum Deflections - Unfactored Loads Load Combination Span Max. "-" Defl Location in Span D+L+Lr 1 0.1255 7.000 Vertical Reactions - Unfactored Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 2460 0 <360 1338 0 <180 Desi.n OK 0.061 : 1 W8X10 1.170 k 19.315 k +D+L+H 0.000 ft Span # 1 Load Combination Support notation : Far left is #1 Max. "+" Defl Location in Span 0.0000 0.000 Values in KIPS Overall MAXimum D Only L Only D+L+S D+L+Lr Steel Section Properties : Depth Web Thick = Flange Width = Flange Thick = Area = Weight Kdesign K1 = rts 1.170 0.680 0.490 1.170 1.170 W8X10 7.890 0.170 3.940 0.205 2.960 10.076 0.505 0.500 1.010 3.945 in in in in in"2 plf in in in in 1.048 0.558 0.490 1.048 1.048 I xx S xx R xx Zx I yy S yy R yy Zy rT 30.80 inA4 7.81 inA3 = 3.220 in = 8.870 inA3 2.090 inA4 = 1.060 inA3 = 0.841 in = 1.660 inA3 0.990 in Cw Wno Sw Qf Qw 0.043 inA4 30.90 in"6 7.570 inA2 1.530 in"4 1.480 inA3 4.290 inA3 ICCORNErRS-if-OE VE ENGINEERING, I N G. Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Steel Beam Design Lic. # : KW-06006053 Description : A 1.2 0.6 -0,5 BEAM---» -0.03 .0.06 G= 8 -0.10 -0.13 2.(E)W8x10x14'-0" Job # Printed: 4 NOV 2010, 2:00Ph4 ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2009, Ver: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 Distance (ft) ! Oveall M4%:m.m E-velooe ■ +D ! +D+I+H ! +D+I.+H • +D+0.7501.+D.75DL+M 8.33 9 7? 11.13 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 Distance (ft) t Ovewll 1.14%%m.m E-velooe • +D ■ +D+L+H ! ♦D+L.+M ! +D+D.75Dl,+D.7SDI+M 833 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 Distance (Ft) ■ Ovc.ell M4%:m.n E.velaoe • DO..Iy ■ l O.1y ■ D+1+5 ■ D+L+1.• 8.33 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 Job # EIIC0F(NEn1r0 NGIN EERI NG, INC. Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Printed: 4 NOV 2010. 2:04PM Steel Beam ,Design Lic. # : KW-06006053 Description : 3. (E) W8x21 x 14'-0" Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Beam Bracing : Completely Unbraced Bending Axis : Major Axis Bending Load Combination 2006 IBC & ASCE 7-05 Applied Loads ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2009, Ver 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. Calculations per IBC 2006, CBC 2007,13th AISC D(0.021) L(0.10) Fy : Steel Yield : 36.0 ksi E: Modulus : 29,000.0 ksi Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Beam self weight calculated and added to loads Loads on all spans... Uniform Load on ALL spans : D = 0.0250, L = 0.10 k/ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 fl DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = Section used for this span Mu : Applied Mn / Omega : Allowable Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs Maximum Deflection Max Downward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Upward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection 0.112 : 1 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = W8X21 3.576 k-ft 31.799 k-ft +D+L+H 7.000ft Span # 1 0.040 in 0.000 in 0.058 in 0.000 in Ratio = Ratio = Ratio = Ratio = Overall Maxinitim Deflections - Unfactored Loads Load Combination Span Max. "-" Defl Location in Span Section used for this span Vu : Applied Vn/Omega : Allowable Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs 4210 0 <360 2884 0 <180 Design OK 0.034 : 1 W8X21 1.022 k 29.808 k +D+L+H 0.000 ft Span # 1 Load Combination Max. "+" Defl Location in Span D+L+Lr 1 0.0582 Vertical'Reactions . Unfactored Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 7.070 Support notation : Far left is #1 0.0000 Values in KIPS 0.000 Overall MAXimum D Only L Only D+L+S D+L+Lr Steel Section Properties Depth Web Thick Flange Width Flange Thick Area Weight Kdesign = K1 = rts = Ycg = 1.022 0.322 0.700 1.022 1.022 . W8X21 8.280 in 0.250 in 5.270 in 0.400 in 6.160 inA2 20.969 plf 0.700 in 0.563 in 1.460 in 4.140 in 1.022 0.322 0.700 1.022 1.022 I xx S xx R xx Zx I yy S yy R yy Zy rT 75.30 in^4 18.20 inA3 = 3.490 in = 20.400 in^3 = 9.770 inA4 = 3.710 inA3 = 1.260 in 5.690 inA3 1.410 in Cw Wno Sw Qf Qw 0.282 in^4 152.00 inA6 10.400 in^2 5.470 in^4 3.960 in^3 10.100 in^3 ECORNESrONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Job # Printed: 4 NOV 2010. 2:04PM Steel 'Beam Design Lic. # : KW-06006053 Description : 3.6 2,7 Le 0.9 BEAM---+o 1.0 0.5 BEAD.-•>p -0.5 •1.0 BEAM ---an -0.015 F -0.030 .0.045 .0.059 3. (E) W8x21 x 14'-0" ' ENERCALC. INC. 1983-2009, Vet: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 Distance (ft) • Ove.e1111M1:m.n E.velope • +D ■ +D+1+H ■ +0+1.+11 • +D+D.7SDL.+D.7501+H 8.33 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 833 Distance (ft) ■ Ove.ell MAX:mum E-vela De • +0 • +D+I+H • +D+L.+H • +D+D.7SDL'+D.75DL+H 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 Distance (ft) ■ O+e.ell MAX:mu, E•velape • DO.Iy IN l O•ly ■ D+1+5 • D+1+1• 8.33 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 Job # ECOFNERE1rONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Printed: 4 NOV 2010. 2:04PM Steel Beam Design Lic. # : KW-06006053 Description : 4. (E) W8x10 x 14'-0" Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Beam Bracing : Completely Unbraced Bending Axis : Major Axis Bending Load Combination 2006 IBC & ASCE 7-05 ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2009, Ver: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. Calculations per IBC 2006, CBC 2007, 13th AISC Applied Loads Beam self weight calculated and added to loads Loads on all spans... Uniform Load on ALL spans : D = 0.0180, L = 0.070 k/ft, DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = Section used for this span Mu : Applied Mn / Omega : Allowable Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs Maximum Deflection Max Downward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Upward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection Overall Maximum Deflections - Unfactored Loads D(0.0180) L(0.070) w8x10 Fy : Steel Yield : 36.0 ksi E: Modulus : 29,000.0 ksi Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Tributary Width = 1.0 fl 0.328 : 1 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = W8X10 2.403 k-ft 7.331 k-ft +D+L+H 7.000ft Span # 1 Design OK 0.036 : 1 Section used for this span W8X10 Vu : Applied 0.6865 k Vn/Omega : Allowable 19.315 k Load Combination +D+L+H Location of maximum on span 0.000 ft Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 0.068 in Ratio = 2460 0.000 in Ratio = 0 <360 0.096 in Ratio = 1756 0.000 in Ratio = 0 <180 Load Combination Span Max. " " Defl Location in Span Load Combination Max. "+" Defl Location in Span D+L+Lr 1 0.0957 Vertical Reactions - Unfactored Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 7.070 Support notation : Far left is #1 0.0000 0.000 Values in KIPS Overall MAXimum D Only L Only D+L+S D+L+Lr Steel Section Properties Depth Web Thick = Flange Width Flange Thick = Area Weight Kdesign K1 = rts = Ycg 0.687 0.197 0.490 0.687 0.687 W8X10 7.890 in 0.170 in 3.940 in 0.205 in 2.960 in"2 10.076 plf 0.505 in 0.500 in 1.010 in 3.945 in 0.687 0.197 0.490 0.687 0.687 I xx S xx R xx Zx I yy S yy R yy Zy rT 30.80 in"4 7.81 in"3 3.220 in 8.870 in"3 2.090 in^4 1.060 in"3 0.841 in 1.660 in"3 0.990 in J Cw Wno Sw Qf Qw 0.043 in^4 30.90 in"6 7.570 inA2 1.530 in^4 1.480 in^3 4.290 in"3 Job # 4., -i COr-E- NErR59feC�NE ENGINEERING, I N C. Steel Beam Design # : KW-06006053 Description : 2.5 1.8 • 1.2 0.6 BEAM---» 0.7 0.4 gBEAM.-->n .0.4 BEAM.--» -0.024 -0.049 -0.073 -0.098 4.(E)W8x10x14'-0" 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : 6.93 Printed: 4 NOV 2010, 2:04PM ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2009, Ver: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 8.33 Distance (ft) ■ Ove.ell MA%:n.n Eevele De ■ +D • +D+I+M ■ +0*1 +9 ■ +0+0.75151,+D.75D1+M 9 73 11.13 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5.53 6.93 Distance (ft) ■ Ove.ell MA%:n.n E.veboe ■ +D t +D+L+H ■ ♦D+L•+H • +D+0.75D1.+D.75DL+H 8.33 973 11.13 12.53 13.93 1.33 2.73 4.13 5,53 6.93 Distance (ft) it Overall MA%: nvnE.velooe • DO.Iy • LO.Iy IN D+laS t D+1.+1, 8.33 9.73 11.13 12.53 13.93 Job # 411c, CORNERSVONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Steel Beam Design Lic. # : KW-06006053 Description : 5. (E) W10x22 x 17'-9" Material Properties Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Printed: 4 NOV 2010, 3:15PI4 ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2009, Ver: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. Calculations per IBC 2006, CBC 2007,13th AISC Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral -torsion buckling Bending Axis : Major Axis Bending Load Combination 2006 IBC & ASCE 7-05 Applied Loads D(0.68 L(0.49) D(0.80 ) L(0.7) D(0.32 Fy : Steel Yield : E: Modulus : L(0.7) D(0.19 L(0.49) Span = 17.750 ft W10X22 36.0 ksi 29,000.0 ksi Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Load(s) for Span Number 1 Point Load : D = 0.680, L = 0.490 k a(�, 4.330 ft, (p2) Point Load : D = 0.8050, L = 0.70 k p 7.50 ft, (p1) Point Load : D = 0.3220, L = 0.70 k 9.170 ft, (p3) Point Load : D = 0.1970, L = 0.490 k A 12.50 ft, (p4) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = 0.314 : 1 Section used for this span W10X22 Mu : Applied 14.663 k-ft Mn / Omega : Allowable 46.707 k-ft Load Combination +D+L+H Location of maximum on span 7.544ft Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Maximum Deflection Max Downward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Upward L+Lr+S Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection Overall Maximum Deflections - Unfactored Loads Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = Section used for this span Vu : Applied Vn/Omega : Allowable Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs 0.124 in Ratio = 0.000 in Ratio = 0.226 in Ratio = 0.000 in Ratio = 1719 0 <360 944 0 <180 Design OK 0.070 : 1 W10X22 2.451 k 35.251 k +D+L+H 0.000 ft Span # 1 Load Combination Span Max. " " Defl Location in Span Load Combination Max. "+" Defl Location in Span D+L+Lr 1 0.2256 Vertical Reactions - Unfactored Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 8.698 Support notation : Far left is #1 0.0000 Values in KIPS 0.000 Overall MAXimum D Only L Only D+L+S D+L+Lr Steel Section Properties Depth = Web Thick = Flange Width = Flange Thick Area = Weight Kdesign = K1 = rts = Ycg 2.451 1.193 1.258 2.451 2.451 W10X22 10.200 in 0.240 in 5.750 in 0.360 in 6.490 inA2 22.092 plf 0.660 in 0.625 in 1.550 in 5.100 in 1.933 0,811 1.122 1.933 1.933 I xx S xx R xx Zx I yy S yy R yy Zy rT 118.00 in^4 23.20 inA3 4.270 in 26.000 inA3 11.400 in^4 3.970 inA3 1.330 in 6.100 inA3 1.510 in Cw Wno Sw Qf Qw 0.239 inA4 275.00 inA6 14.100in^2 7.320 in^4 4.880 inA3 12.900 inA3 Job # `_� CORNEiRS1rONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Steel Beam Design LIc. # : KW-06006053 Description : 15 11 7 4 BEAM-.-» 2.5 1.4 0.3 78 BEAM- >a .0.06 E .0.12 2 -0.17 .0.23 5. (E) W10x22 x 17-9" Title : Dsgnr: Project Desc.: Project Notes : Printed: 4 NOV 2010. 3:15P1.4 ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2009, Ver: 6.1.00 License Owner : CORNERTSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 1.69 3.46 5.24 7.01 8.79 Distance (ft) • Ove.ell HAX,n.n E•velaae • +D • +D+L+H ■ +D+L.+H • +D+D.7501.+0.7S0L+H 10.56 12.34 14.11 15.89 17.66 1,69 3.46 5.24 7.01 8.79 10.56 12.34 Distance (ft) • Ove.all MAX:n.n E•velooe • +D ■ +D+L+H ■ +D+L,+H ■ +0+D.7SDL.+0.750L+11 14.11 15.89 17.66 1.69 3,46 5.24 7.01 8.79 Distance (ft) • Ove.ell HAX.n..n E.velaoe • DO+Iy • L O.. y • D+L+5 • D+L+I. 10.56 12.34 14.11 15.89 17.66 Project: WA-SEA-119S10.5 Date: November 8, 2010 Client: Clearwire Prepared By: K. Nguyen CEl No.: 10-49057 Page Analysis of Additional Antenna / Microwave Equipment on Existing Penthouse Walls 16928 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE. Suite 210 Woodinville. WA 98072 Email: ceiriP,cornerstone-engr.com Web: www�_cornerstone-engr.com CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 by sheet no. E.oRNEFRs1roNE • ENGINEERING. I N C. project location date client checked date CEI job no. Sw4P OUT Miceo LisH (3,) (E) 2¢'`,S c ✓/sH o) 2''0 STAND/el) /3PE MIST SWAP- 0147 (2) MTH 36 "¢$ fil/ o1'UUVE- . a/E/ /T 35' EX/ST/i06' Sue 19,MCieeTs ieE LoenTED 4( A,°A'AT CD (3) 21( (Th Ex!sTl er PleOP SED 0)(E) 24 "O Al t!1 (z)(f) �'°o Mw / ce-o w/11/E "015T CauFffid,e4Tiati 1/11oci r A,'6.74 l , (E) 2 4 ' // w 2 2 # 3, / .,SF 2, (P) 36'/0 /n 35',e2 70 /4, sF 1, (E) 2 "0 STD, PeE A .fir 70 M/st 38 project by sheet no. CORNERS-1rONE 4_• E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. location date client checked date CEI job no. DESIG,u LOALS SES/n IG Sos f 0,947 , E0,2 Sps Jp = o,/ Zvf) EN = (Qe = 0,4E(U1p) 32, 7 PSF 3 2.7 PsP (3»s) F 32.7 PSF (zo7sF) CHECK Ex/STIIa PIPE MAST V = (223I)+/oa5654 2 MT 231* (r,o) = 23/=2,772"" ASSuin EX/S7/,16 2 ir0 STD P/PE mfTERAL 4STm A 5o0 G� B ry = 35 Rs(' Fcc — 60Ks( J3 P3 .Ev= 38# EH = 90 # P2= 103* P •23/# i D = 16,6 ) = 0,1439 ) D= 2.33// J T= /•25 iJ4 Tom. 0,6274u F1,23 E r fl b t 1.23 (29) 000 Ks!) 16,6 4 2.3g" 327 Ksi by sheet no. ECOFNEFRS1rONE• E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. project location date client checked date CEI job no. = 0,6(25 cr 1• S ol&0,(2 zo Kst) = 26o Ks� Fc r SMALL NOT ExCEED 0-6O F:y Fc = D,60 (si) - 2/ Ks"' TORSIONAL SHEA COuSTAAJT c = - 2 (l, 5 /N 4) = 1, 2 6 //U 3 2.3 8" %n .= F r , C 2 / Ks i (/. 26 rn� 26,5 K= n 9T e 0,9(2,6,5d 23.Sk > 2.77k pk -�j Ex'l5 TIN6 .2 "e;ei STD P/PE To sIONAL ST,EIVah is ADCQuATE Ta SPPOCT Re,OPOSED m/C,F?WAUE 1)/S41, CNE GK DEFLECT/O/U , A -.-. — (e ± cc) - *Pate 23) (18�,Z .3 & T 3(29>e I06P-S1) 0.42740 L /s" 0,0906 " 199 > 12 © DK . (4.)), 1s) = o,D906" ExtsTua- 2'1 STD PIPE' DEFLECT/0/U /s 4tEquAT6 To SuPPaeT Pko Po5 E D M I c eo Wit u e . Des H project by sheet no. ECOFRNEFS1rcDNE E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. location date client checked date CEI job no. CHECK Exisr/A4 CO WEGT1oN THE £x/srMVG SL/DER Bra C?t ET 1/AS (2) , /10 J//LTI Kil A' &2L7 1- 74 ,48LE 7fit S2g4/6tar 2 3/# f /v3/ = 2834 4t= .2Boas (5 %) 10564 _' Ex /S TINS SL/DER C7/J/t/ECTiat/ /S ,4,p EC? MTE TD StoPoor f',eoPr &o /7lceow,4 ves , Page 4 of 9 ESR-1385 TABLE 3 - CARBON STEEL KWIK BOLT 3 ALLOWABLE TENSION AND SHEAR VALUES IN NORMAL -WEIGHT CONCRETE (in pounds)'" Anchor diameter (Inch) Anchor depth (inches) rc . 2,000 psi rc . 3,000 psi re . 4,000 psi /c . 6,000 psi Tension Shear Tension Shear Tension Shear Tension Shear With Sp. insp.' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. lnsp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. 1/4 1 1/8 276 138 449 338 169 449 399 200 449 510 255 449 2 594 297 449 669 335 449 745 372 449 766 383 449 3 661 331 449 714 357 449 766 383 449 766 383 449 3/8 1 5/8 678 339 1061 846 423 1164 1013 506 1268 1013 506 1423 2 1/2 1179 590 1255 1424 712 1339 1669 835 1423 1846 923 1423 3 1/2 1450 725 1255 1560 780 1339 1669 835 1423 1846 923 1423 1/2 2 1/4 1049 524 1745 1284 642 2143 1519 759 2541 1853 927 2717 3 1/2 1810 905 1832 2048 1024 2186 2286 1143 2541 3035 1518 2717 4 3/4 2000 1000 1832 2207 1103 2186 2414 1207 2541 3063 1541 2717 5/8 2 3/4 1766 883 2578 1898 949 3198 2029 1015 3817 2601 1300 3988 4 2469 1235 3324 2805 1402 3571 3141 1570 3817 3825 1912 3988 5 1/2 3079 1539 3324 3462 1731 3571 3846 1923 3817 4992 2496 3988 3/4 3 1/4 1949 974 3834 2230 1115 4593 2510 1255 5353 3475 1738 5353 4 3/4 3007 1503 4701 3956 1978 5579 4905 2452 6456 5714 2857 6456 6 1/2 4173 2087 4701 5369 2685 5579 6565 3283 6456 6565 3283 6456 1 4 1/2 2930 1465 6625 3650 1825 7125 4375 2188 7625 4360 2180 8625 6 3990 1995 8625 5310 2655 8625 6625 3313 8625 7875 3938 8625 9 6040 3020 8625 7050 3525 8625 8055 4028 8625 10000 5000 8625 For Si: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 psi = 69 kPa, 1 lb = 4.45 N. 'The tabula ed tension and shear values are for Kwik Bolt 3 installed in stone aggregate concrete having the compressive s rength at the time of anchor installation. Concrete aggregate must comply with ASTM C 33. These loads may be interpolated for Concrete strengths and embedments between the tabulated values. 'Allowable loads or applied loads may be modified in accordance with Section 5.5 of this report due to short-term wind or seismic loads. These tension values are only applicable when anchors are installed with special inspection as set forth in Section 4.3 of this Report. TABLE 4 - HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED KWIK BOLT 3 ALLOWABLE TENSION AND SHEAR VALUES IN NORMAL -WEIGHT CONCRETE (in pounds)'''• Anchor diameter (inch) Anchor depth (inches) rc . 2,000 psi rc . 3,000 psi It . 4,000 • i re . 6,000 psi Tension Shear Tension Shear Tension Shear Tension Shear With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. 1/2 2 1/4 1055 528 1673 1185 592 2107 1314 657 2541 1553 776 2717 3 1/2 1775 887 1745 1983 991 2143 2191 1095 2541 2912 1456 2717 4 3/4 2078 1039 1745 2373 1187 2143 2669 1334 2541 3375 1687 2717 5/8 2 3/4 1639 820 2690 1803 902 3253 1967 984 3817 2522 1261 3988 4 2363 1182 3324 2929 1464 3571 3495 1747 3817 4900 2450 3988 5 1/2 3163 1581 3324 3778 1889 3571 4394 2197 3817 5327 2663 3988 3/4 ' 3 1/4 2090 1045 3834 2253 1126 4442 2415 1208 5050 2496 1248 5050 4 3/4 3328 1664 4701 3880 1940 4876 4432 2216 5050 5177 2589 5050 6 1/2 4607 2304 4701 5229 2615 4876 5851 2926 5050 6685 3342 5050 For Si: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 psi = 6 9 kPa, 1 lb = 4.45 N. 'The tabula ed tension and shear values shall apply to Kwik Bolt 3 installed in stone aggregate normal -weight concrete having the compressive strength at the time of anchor installation. Concrete aggregate shall comply with ASTM C 33. These loads may be interpolated for concrete strengths and embedments between the tabulated values. 'Allowable loads or applied Toads may be modified in accordance with Section 5.5 of this report due to short-term wind or seismic loads. 3These tension values are only applicable when anchors are installed with special inspection as set forth in Section 4.3 of this Report. ' The anchors are permitted to be installed in a Hilti matched -tolerance diamond cored hole. 'Allowable tension loads may be increased by 4% for the 3/4 inch diameter anchor if installed in a drilled hole using carbide -tipped masonry driill bits. TABLE 5 - STAINLESS STEEL KWIK BOLT 3 ALLOWABLE TENSION AND SHEAR VALUES VALUES IN NORMAL -WEIGHT CONCRETE (in pounds)'" Anchor diameter (inch) Anchor depth (inches) rc . 2,000 psi rc • 3,000 psi rc . 4,000 psi rc . 6,000 psi Tension Shear Tension Shear Tension Shear Tension Shear With Sp. insp.' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. With Sp. Insp.' Without Sp. Insp. 1/4 1 1/8 235 118 560 289 144 627 343 171 693 422 211 763 2 493 247 599 567 283 646 640 320 693 785 392 763 3 568 294 599 632 316 646 677 339 693 785 392 763 3/8 1 5/8 546 273 825 601 301 1043 657 328 1261 855 427 1582 2 1/2 1170 585 1451 1301 650 1549 1432 716 1647 1716 858 1647 3 1/2 1385 692 1451 1488 744 1549 1591 795 1647 1729 865 1647 1/2 2 1/4 922 461 1757 1120 560 1995 1318 659 2233 1474 737 2571 3 1/2 1313 657 2702 1800 900 2702 2288 1144 2702 2413 1207 2702 4 3/4 1809 905 2702 2045 1023 2702 2281 1140 2702 2716 1358 2702 5/8 2 3/4 1470 735 2697 1564 782 3269 1657 829 3840 2082 1041 4283 4 2210 1105 4283 2609 1304 4283 3008 1504 4283 3959 1979 4283 5 1/2 3163 1581 4283 3531 1766 4283 3900 1950 4283 5337 2668 4283 3/4 3 1/4 1450 725 2700 1825 913 2700 2200 1100 2700 2450 1225 2700 4 3/4 2350 1175 4225 2990 1495 4225 3625 1813 4225 4375 2188 4225 6 2750 1375 4500 3500 1750 4500 4250 2125 4500 4800 2400 4500 1 4 1/2 2300 1150 5700 2850 1425 6350 3400 1700 7000 4500 2250 7000 6 3740 1870 7000 4930 2465 7000 6120 3060 7000 6875 3438 7000 9 5250 2625 7000 7025 3513 7000 8800 4400 7000 8800 4400 7000 For 51: 1 in = 25.4 mm, 1 psi = 6 9 kPa, 1 Ib = 4.45 N. 'See Table 3 for footnotes. project by sheet no. ECOFNAi EiRS1rDNE • ENGINEERING, I N C. location date client checked date CEI job no. VA1-MoJT SLIDER BRACksT 4,4 L ti(106 L3)346. x2�(o (2) N lleA A307 PER SRA GKET (E) S7eEL ST14 WAL. 0 project by sheet no. __jcoFRNEFRs1roNE ENGINEERING, I N C. location date client checked date CEI job no. A M41-YS/S OF A4D/rwwN A,ureNN4 , Ait)7E/V/Ui41 SpEc/fir,4T/O/J, K,4THRE/AJ 840 - /0054 s WE/ 1 r 3o 4 101.5C., = /00 DESIGN LOADS SEISMIC 5 s D.947 Ev = 0,2 S4s, Wio ®./ 9(We) �H = QE = 0, 4.S (Wp) Mkt) 9 = 32,7 P.sW Aw Ftv L UJ D 42ix /2.,7Px 2,8 E v = 20# EH= 454 (J2.7"42)/144 1 1,3siAse = 5,OSF 32-7P5F (5Sr) FWD /64 TRY 2 "9 SYAA'D/}e Poo- 444f T , 4TE,eiAL MSTM 453 V = Fw V644') - 8 2.# 114 = % �� L = % (164#) 4' = 164° ' ate 19623 " by sheet no. EcDFNERS1rDNE E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. project location date client checked date CEI job no. Diiimiustcy PRoPERT/Es 2 /' 4 S7ADD//kD PifE ,35lab = 0,143u Fu= 60f&&t 4 = 16,6 CHEC/c COMPACTNESS 0,07E 0,07 (29, 00D kse) P ry 35 Ks'' Z= 0,713M? D= 2,38" E = 29, 000 Ksc I 0.6 27 /N ¢ 58 16, 6 < % SEc.rlvu /s < 0,45 E irTY 373 =� SPEC,fIcA 35 ,'st' ( 0,7/3/,0 AVA/LAB LE FcEXURilL ST,eaAJG7N 2, 0 Mn 25 k-" .SZ 2.0 CHECK DEFLECTION 12, 590 " 196 8*-11 LIMITED 164* (4.03 40 (29906Ps).627/to CoMPherED Tim) SEQ7'/J F 8 /) ppuE `25,-„ 0,02o2 " 2 3 / 0 > 36o og 2''ce S7-4,04 of P/PE WILL ,BE ST,€Iac ama ' ADEQUATE TO SUPPoer THE Pep,03E0 AIv Te-IUNA sheet no. EcoiRNEFS1rONE E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. project by location date client checked date CEI job no. DES/0 PIPE 7/24 T CoAt/NEcVVO,U To COlOA)47ioN LRFD LOAD CASES s 4, 1,2,E + 1,6 w 5, 1,2D + 1,0 E 6, aD + 1, w 7, 0,9D -+ 1,0 E BY /i$ pe cT/D,1 LOAD E?as7W6 ST,e /c rii2E CASES # 6 AAfD # 7 CoNia. THE DESIGN. F:o- F'T-Rc- EH -4, Pc= Rr- �H V - (v� Ev)= V - wp Ev EM;®_ x(4±Ev) + % eEH- LRT =� = (w ±Ev) + % E 12 "(5o) 5 = IDp4 LOAD CASES 7 (0,9 b+ I o e v Aga # (sNEAR ) I T- i5 (oo4) = 31* (TEU) R B _. 31* (CAMP) ANTENNA F B,D SIDE' VFW sheet no. EcoRNEFRs1roNE• ENGINEERING. I N C. project by location date client checked date CEI job no. Lo, CO' VAT/o,U #6 (D,9 + 1.oE aF; o. Fw-Fit-Fv2 Fut Fug- F/2_ t; 0 = V - I,U Lur V = 90* (s4 FUj _ Fv2 _ IG4/ 82# t Viz - % U��� FV,Z 451 + g . 613,54 Vm - 93, 5# Fv, JFw Futi v4 o -A JTENNA F 6,D, F .oJr View Project: WA-SEA-1 19S10.5 Date: November 8, 2010 Client: Clearwire Prepared By: K. Nguyen CEI No.: 10-49057 Page References 1) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE 7-05), 2006 2) International Building Code (2009 IBC), International Code Council, 2009. 3) Supplement — Design Values for Wood Construction (NDS), American Wood Council, 2005 Ed. 4) For Wood Construction (NDS), American Wood Council, 2005 Ed. 5) Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD, Donald E. Breyer, Kenneth J. Fridley, Kelly E. Cobeen, & David G. Pollock, The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 6th Ed., 2007. 6) Timber Construction Manual, American Institute of Timber Construction, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1st Ed., 1966. 7) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08), American Concrete Institute. 2008. 16928 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE. Suite 210 Woodinville. WA 98072 Email: ceiiicornerstone-engr.com Web: www.cornerstone-ener.com CORNERS -TONE ENGINEERING, I N C. Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 • Project: WA-SEA-1 I9S 10.5 Date: November 8, 2010 Client: Clearwire Prepared By: K. Nguyen CEI No.: 10-49057 Page Attachments 16928 Woodinville -Redmond Rd NE. Suite 210 Woodinville. WA 98072 Email: cei crcornerstone-engr.com Web: ‘vw w.cornerstone-engr.com CORNERSTONE • ENGINEERING, I N C. Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 KATH�E1Il SCALA DIVISION Kathrein Scala's XX-polarized adjustable electrical downtilt antennas offer the carrier the ability to tailor sites for optimum performance. Using variable downtilt, only a few models need be procured to accommodate the needs of widely varying conditions. Remotely controlled downtilt is available as a retrofitable option. • 0-10° electrical downtilt range. • DC Grounded metallic parts for impulse suppression. • No moving electrical connections. • Optional remote downtilt control. Specifications: Frequency range 2496-2690 MHz Gain 2 x 16 dBi Impedance 50 ohms VSWR < 1.5:1 Intermodulation (2x20w) IM3:< -150 dBc Polarization +45° and -45° Front -to -back ratio >23 dB typical Maximum input power 300 watts (at 50°C) +45° and -45° polarization horizontal beamwidth 87 degrees at midband (half power) +45° and -45° polarization vertical beamwidth 7 degrees at midband (half power) Electrical downtilt continously adjustable 0-10 degrees Connector 4 x 7-16 DIN female Sidelobe suppression for first sidelobe above horizon 0° 4° 8° 10° 15 15 15 15 dB (typical) Null fill > -1 dBi to 12° below horizon (typical) (17 dB below 16 dBi main beam) Isolation >30 dB Weight 30 Ib (13.6 kg) Dimensions 42 x 12.7 x 2.8 inches (1067 x 323 x 71 mm) Equivalent flat plate area 4.8 ft2 (0.45 m2) Wind survival rating' 120 mph (200 kph) Shipping dimensions 48 x 13.3 x 5.1 inches (1220 x 337 x 130 mm) Shipping weight 34 Ib (15.4 kg) Mounting Fixed and tilt -mount options are available for 2 to 5.7 inch (50 to 145 mm) OD masts. See reverse for order information. Mechanical design is based on environmental conditions as stipulated in EIA-222-F (June 1996) and/or ETS 300 019-1-4 which include the static mechanical load imposed on an antenna by wind at maximum velocity. See the Engineering Section of the catalog for further details. RoHS ukg Lead-Fnee 11098-A 270 1l Horizon al pattern t45°- polarization 0° electrical downtilt 180 Horizon al pattern ±45°- polarization 5° electrical downtilt Horizon al pattern ±45°- polarization 10° electrical downtilt 840 10054 87° XX-pol Panel Antenna 2496-2690 MHz 270 Vertical pattern t45°- polarization 0° electrical downtilt 100 Vertical pattern t45°- polarization 5° electrical downtilt Vertical pattern t45°- polarization 10° electrical downtilt Kathrein Inc., Scala Division Post Office Box 4580 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Phone: (541) 779-6500 Fax: (541) 779-3991 Email: communications@kathrein.com Internet: www.kathrein-scala.com ! , K1:ITHFIE Ii1 SCALA DIVISION Mounting Options: Model Description 2 x 738 546 Mounting Kit for 2 to 4.6 inch (50 to 115 mm) OD mast. 850 10013 Tilt Kit for use with the 2 x 738 546 mounting kit 0-15 degrees downtilt angle. Order Information: Model Description 840 10054 Antenna with 7-16 DIN connectors 840 10054 87° XX-pol Panel Antenna 2496-2690 MHz 2.625 inches ± 0.125 (68 mm ± 4) 42 inches (1067 mm) 44.1 inches (1120 mm) 45.3 inches (1151 mm) 2.8 inches (71 mm) 12.7 inches (323 mm) 3.9 inches (98 mm) RCU -45°I +45° I-45°l +45°I RCU 1 2496-2690 Left I Right 2496-2690 Layout of interface All specifications are subject to change without notice. The latest specifications are available at www.kathrein-scala.com. Kathrein Inc., Scala Division Post Office Box 4580 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Phone: (541) 779-6500 Fax: (541) 779-3991 Email: communications@kathrein.com Internet: www.kathrein-scala.com 4 - 11/05/2010 4adioWaves 13 GHz Parabolic Antenna... Contact Us - Shopping Cart - Careers Phone (847) 584-1000 Fax (847) 584-9951 Toll Free (877) 288-6139 Home Antennas Arrestors Atte nuators Broadband Cable Assemblies Coaxial Cable Connectors Grounding Elliptical Waveguides Elliptical Waveguide Assemblies I.T. Equipment Industrial Batteries Radios Radio Repair Repeaters Radio Loggers R.F. Detection & Jamming Shelters E.0 D. Tools Tools Towers Trap & Trace Tripods/ Pan & Tilt Waveguide Search this site... Careers Forms Installations & Engineering Services Terms & Conditions Contact Us We are a proud member of NATE Lightning Protection: National Association of Tower Erectors When top mounting an antenna, proper grounding procedures to the tower must be observed. You MUST ire GSA No. GS-35F-0479T DoD Cage Code 48EX8 Home > Antennas > RadioWaves Antennas > RadioWaves 13 GHz Parabolic Antennas RadioWaves 13 GHz Parabolic Antennas Mode( Number Diameter ft (cm) Gain, dBi Beamwidtfi Degrees, 3dB B X. Pol. Disc., dB F/B Ratio dB VSWR Max. (R.L.,Now dB) 1 Buy Low Mid High Plane Polarized HPLP1-18 1 (30) 33.5 34.0 34.4 3.0 30 53 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy HPLP1.5-18 1.5 (45) 35.7 36.2 36.7 2.5 30 58 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy HP2-18 2 (60) 38.2 38.6 39.0 2.0 30 66 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy HP3-18 3 (90) 41.6 42.0 42.4 1.3 30 69 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy HP4-18 4 (120) 44.1 44.5 44.9 1.0 30 72 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy Dual Polarized HPLPD1-18 1 (30) 33.3 33.8 34.2 3.0 30 53 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Rity )IPLPD1.5-18 1.5 (45) 35.5 36.0 36.5 2.5 30 58 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buv )IPD2-18 2 (60) 38.0 38.4 38.8 2.0 30 66 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy HPD3-18 3 (90) 41.4 41.8 42.2 1.3 30 69 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy HPD4-18 4 (120) 43.8 44.3 44.7 1.0 30 72 1.4:1 (15.5) How to Buy Product Features • Antenna diameters 2' (60 cm) 3' (90 cm) 4' (120 cm) 6' (180 cm) • Antenna weights 2' 22 lbs. (9.9 kg) 3' 35 lbs. (15.8 kg) 4' 60 lbs. (27.0 kg) 6' 95 lbs. (42.8 kg) • SP models: standard parabolic, plane polarized • SPD models: dual polarized • IEC or EIA flanges available • Direct mounting for RF units available • Ease of installation: antennas shipped completely assembled, minimal mount required • Optional molded radomes. Radomes shipped factory installed, except 6' model • Rugged and lightweight cast aluminum mount with fine adjustment for both azimuth and elevation • Standard white; other colors and/or logos available on request • Corrosive resistant: mount materials are coated aluminum, hot dipped galvanized steel and stainless steel • Three year warranty Notes / Precautions: antennasystenns.com/. ./13ahz.html 1/2 CITY OF TUKWILA RECEIVED [JAN 0 6 20111 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION WIRELESS TELE- COMMUNICATION FACILITIES FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P-WCF Planner: JTtit wife Raw 5 Application Complete (Date: 21y(2.ot ) Application Incomplete (Date: File Number: IT f) I — 7J3 Project File Number: pz., ` / - v Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Clearwire - SEA119 Tukwila Doubletree LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 16500 Southcenter Parkway LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 6437300020 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: RealCom Associates - Sarah Telschow Address: 14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 260 Phone: (425) 274-4444 ext. 114 E-mail: stelsrJhow r:atea�soc.com FAX: (425) 274-4449 Signature: Date: 0 H 0 S 1 L11-003 RECEIVE( JAN 0 6 20111 MMUNt • COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Depaitiuent of Public Works). Gtieck items submitted .applicatiOn Information Reiuired" . flay be waived inn uusual cases upon a r�()val oI boiliaPublic'`Worksxand Planging APPLICATION MATERIALS: Items 1-9 are required for ALL Wireless Telecommunication Facilities. x 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. x 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). X 3. Four sets of plans prepared by a design professional. The plans shall include a vicinity map, site map, architectural elevations, method of attachment, proposed screening, location of proposed antennas, and all other information which accurately depicts the proposed project. Minimum size is 8.5" by 11". Plans shall be no greater than 24" x 36". x 4. Application Fee: See attached Land Use Fee Schedule. X 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). N/A 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist. SEPA is not required when the facility: i) Is a microshell and is to be attached to an exiting structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school; ii) Includes personal wireless antennas, other than a microcell, and is to be attached to an existing structure (that may be an existing tower) that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school, and the existing structure to which it is to be attached is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest or agriculture zone; or iii) Involves constructing a personal wireless tower less than sixty feet in height that is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone. X 7. A letter from the applicant describing the proposed project and describing compliance with the City's Code requirements. N/A 8. Sensitive Area studies and proposed mitigation (if required). N/A 9. If an outdoor generator is proposed, a report prepared by an acoustical engineer demonstrating compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". If the application requires a Type II review these additional items are needed: X 10. Four sets of photo simulations that depict the existing and proposed view of the proposed facility; x 11. Materials board for the screening material; N/A 12. Landscaping plan; X 13. Letter from a radio frequency engineer that demonstrates that the facility meets Federal requirements for allowed emissions; N/A 14. If the facility is located within a residential zone, a report from a radio frequency engineer explaining the need for the proposed wireless communication facility at that location. Additionally, the applicant shall provide detailed discussion on why the wireless communication facility cannot be located within a commercial or industrial zone. If the application requires a Type IV review these additional items are needed: 15. A narrative responding to the criteria at TMC Section 18.58.060. 16. The radio frequency engineer report shall include a discussion of the information required under TMC Section 18.58.070. The report shall also explain why a tower must be used instead of any of the other location options outlined in Table A. 17. Engineering Plans for the proposed tower. 18. A vicinity map depicting the proposed extent of the service area. 19. A graphic simulation showing the appearance of the proposed tower and ancillary structures and ancillary facilities from five points within the impacted vicinity. Such points are to be mutually agreed upon by the Director of DCD and applicant. All plans and photo simulations shall include the maximum build -out of the proposed facility. 20. Evidence of compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for height and lighting and certificates of compliance from all affected agencies. 21. Evidence that the tower has been designed to meet the minimum structural standards for wireless communication facilities for a minimum of three providers of voice, video or data transmission services, including the applicant, and including a description of the number and types of antennas the tower can accommodate. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 22. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 23. Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple -family buildings—e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks —must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). Or See attached Land Use Fee Schedule for City of Tukwila to provide labels 24. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. A-SEA119S10.5 TUKWILLA DOUBLETREE EXISTING AND PROPOSED WEST ELEVAT A-SEA119S10.5 TUKW1LLA DOUBLETREE EXISTING AND PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION clear' wireless bro A-SEA119S10.5 TUKWILLA DOUBLETREE EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION A-SEA119S10.5 TUKWILLA DOUBLETREE EXISTING EAST ELEVATION A-SEA119S1O.5 TUKWILLA DOUBLETREE PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION * clear SITE NUMBER: WA-SEA119S10.5 SITE NAME: TUKWILA DOUBLETREE DRAWING INDEX TO1 TITLE SHEET NO1 C01 GENERAL NOTES SITE PLAN C01.1 ENLARGED SITE PLANS CO2 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION CO2.1 CO2.2 CO2.3 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION CO3 C04 C05 EXISTING & PROPOSED ANTENNA PLANS ANTENNA DETAILS EQUIPMENT DETAILS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. -ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CLEARWIRE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. APPROVAL BLOCK SITE ACQUISITION DATE LAND USE REP. DATE RF ENGINEER DATE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE TEAM LEAD DATE PRODUCTION LEAD DATE OTHER DATE APPROVAL BLOCK THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZE THE CONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANY CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS THEY MAY IMPOSE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SITE ACQUISITION DATE VICINITY MAP DRIVING DIRECTIONS DEPARTING FROM KIRKLAND CLEARWIRE OFFICE: START AT 4400 CARILLON PT, KIRKLAND TURN RIGHT ON CARILLON PT. TURN RIGHT ON LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NE. TURN LEFT ON NORTHUP WAY. TURN RIGHT ON 108TH AVE NE TOWARD REDMOND (WA-520). TURN RIGHT TO TAKE RAMP ONTO WA-520 E TOWARD REDMOND. TAKE THE EVERETT/RENTON EXIT ONTO 1-405 S TOWARD RENTON-. TAKE THE SEATTLE/SOUTHCENTER BLVD & MALL EXIT TOWARD SOUTHCENTER BLVD & MALL. TAKE RIGHT FORK ONTO SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TURN RIGHT ON 61 ST AVE S. TURN RIGHT ON SOUTHCENTER PKY. ARRIVE AT 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKY, TUKWILA, ON THE LEFT PROJECT INFORMATION OWNER APPROVAL DATE SITE GPS COORDINATES COP�NERS1rONE _m, ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX: 425.487.1734 6 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG! 811 NATIONAL UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATE EWE, PREM.. MAIL BE 1 ,ta%_HTED BY COM,RAcmng8) AT .1. •TRENf)YNO WAO YIY'F W. CURRENT OBNABTMW= ELECTRIC -RED SEWER -GREEN WAX •YELLOW SLAW, -PM MACAW-CMNGE PROPOSED.WWIE . TER -AWE 5 LATITUDE (NAD 83): LONGITUDE (NAD 83): TOP OF STRUCTURE: 47° 27' 15.4" N 122° 15' 38.3" W 90.-3" AGL (EXISTING PENTHOUSE) SCOPE OF WORK SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: JURISDICTION: PARCEL ZONING: CURRENT USE: PROPOSED USE: PROPERTY OWNER: A/E: SAC: CONSTRUCTION:. LANDLORD CONTACT: PERMITTING: RF ENGINEER: BH ENGINEER: THIS PROPOSAL IS FOR THE MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING UNSTAFFED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING OF REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT OF CLEARWIRE (2) MICROWAVE ANTENNAS AND THE ADDITION OF (1) PANEL ANTENNA, (1) RRU AND MOUNTING HARDWARE TO AN EXISTING BUILDING PENTHOUSE; ALSO THE ADDITION OF AN EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON AN EXISTING ROOFTOP PLATFORM NEAR THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT CABINET. 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 CLEARWIRE US LLC CITY OF TUKWILA 643730-0020 TUC TELECOMMUNICATIONS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CHA SOUTHCENTER LLC 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 SITE QUALIFICATION PARTICIPANTS NAME COMPANY MARK OLSON RACHEL TITUS TRACY WEBSTER JACK O'CONNOR SARAH TELSCHOW CESAR TANSENGCO ROSS GALANG CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC. REALCOM ASSOCIATES LLC REALCOM ASSOCIATES LLC CHA SOUTHCENTER LLC REALCOM ASSOCIATES LLC CLEARWIRE US LLC CLEARWIRE US LLC NUMBER (425)487-1732 (425) 274-4444 x116 (206) 330-1723 (206) 575-4736 (425)274-4444 x114 (425) 216-7600 (425) 216-7600 clearw r ® 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA1 1 9S1 0.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA98188 0 A NO. 01-04-11 11-23-10 DATE FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR CLIENT REVIEW REVISIONS CEI # 4 ♦: 3 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG clearw're® AJB JDG MWO TITLE SHEET BMH JDG MWO BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER DRAWN BY: BMH WA-SEA119S10.5-T01 2 1 RE 0 T SITEWORK NOTES: CONCRETE NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 1. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSED ONLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ANY REQUIREMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INSTALLATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS AND OWNERS PROJECT MANUAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND STANDARDIZED DETAILS THAT REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS DUE TO ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY CLEARWIRE REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO START OF WORK 3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISITTHE JOB SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. CONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION, ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER VERBALLY AND IN WRITING. 4. THE ARCHITECTS/ENGINEER HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK CONTRACTORS BIDDING THE JOB ARE NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED THAT MINOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS AND OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. THE BIDDER SHALL BEAR RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING (IN WRITING) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS, ERROR, OR OMISSIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MORE EXTENSIVE WORK; UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. 5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, SAFETY, AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'SNENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 8. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE, AT THE PROJECT SITE, A FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. THIS SET IS A VALID CONTRACT DOCUMENT ONLY IF THE TITLE SHEET IS STAMPED IN RED INK 'FOR CONSTRUCTION' AND EACH SUCCESSIVE SHEET BEARS THE ENGINEER'S SIGNED WET STAMP. 10. ALL MATERIAL FURNISHED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE NEW, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL WORK SHALL BE GUARANTEED AGAINST DEFECTS IN MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE AT HIS EXPENSE ALL WORK THAT MAY DEVELOP DEFECTS IN MATERIALS OR WORKMANSHIP WITHIN SAID PERIOD OF TIME OR FOR ONE YEAR AFTER THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAILY CLEAN UP OF ALL TRADES AND REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY CLEAN THE BUILDING, SITE, AND ANY OTHER SURROUNDING AREAS TO A BETTER THAN NEW CONDITION. 12. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATELY BRACING AND PROTECTING ALL WORK DURING CONSTRUCTION AGAINST DAMAGE, BREAKAGE, COLLAPSE, ETC. ACCORDING TO APPUCABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR ALL DAMAGES TO BETTER THAN NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSULTANT OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE BUILDING SITE OR ANY ADJACENT STRUCTURES AROUND THE PROJECT. THE LESSOR REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE SOLE AND FINAL JUDGE AS TO THE QUALITY OF THE REPAIRED CONSTRUCTION. ANY ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS WHICH MUST BE MADE SHALL BE MADE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 15. WHERE NEW PAVING, CONCRETE SIDEWALKS OR PATHS MEET EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING PITCH, GRADE, AND ELEVATION SO THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH TRANSITION. GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED: 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MODIFY THE EXISTING FLOORS, WALL, CEILING, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO GAIN ACCESS TO AREAS FOR ALL MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, OR STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS. WHERE THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DOORS, PARTITIONS, CEILING, ETC., ARE TO BE REMOVED, MODIFIED, OR REARRANGED OR WHERE THE EXPOSED OR HIDDEN MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, SYSTEMS ARE ADDED OR MODIFIED, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR, PATCH AND MATCH ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND FINISHES OF ALL FLOORS WALLS AND CEILINGS. WHERE CONCRETE MASONRY CONSTRUCTION IS MODIFIED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TOOTH IN ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH THE EXISTING BOND. WHERE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION IS MODIFIED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT DETAILS TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL WORK SHALL BE COVERED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACT. 17. TOWER FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE GROUNDED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR. TOWER FOUNDATION STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE CONNECTED TO PERMANENT GROUND ROD PRIOR TO TOWER ERECTION. TOWER GROUND MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 18. IMMEDIATELY UPON AWARD OF CONTRACT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO KEEP ALL DOCUMENTATION ACKNOWLEDGING APPLICATION FOR POWER WITH THE POWER COMPANY. 19. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN CONFIRMATION OF THE EXPECTED DATE OF COMPLETION OF THE POWER CONNECTION FROM THE POWER COMPANY. 20. IF THE POWER COMPANY IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE POWER CONNECTION BY CLEARWIRES REQUIRED DATE, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN A TEMPORARY GENERATOR UNTIL THE POWER COMPANY CONNECTION IS COMPLETED. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TEMPORARY GENERATOR TO BE APPROVED BY THE CLEARWIRE REPRESENTATIVE. 21. IF CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR FIND IT NECESSARY TO DEVIATE FROM ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS, THEN IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S AND THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE CONSULTANT WITH 4 COPIES OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES FOR HIS APPROVAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. IN ADDITION THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROCURING ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS FROM THE BUILDING AUTHORITIES FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROCURING ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS FROM BUILDING AUTHORITIES DURING THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK 22. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A10BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM WORK DURING OWNERS PREFERRED HOURS TO AVOID DISTURBING NORMAL BUSINESS. 24. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE -RATED AREAS WITH U.L. LISTED OR FIRE MARSHAL APPROVED MATERIALS AS APPLICABLE TO THIS FACILITY AND OR PROJECT SITE. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR UTILITY LOCATES, SCHEDULING, COORDINATING SPECIAL AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING AND UTILIZING ORIGINAL ROOFING CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING ROOFING WARRANTY. 27. ROUTING OF ALL CONDUITS, CABLES, CABLE TRAYS ETC ARE INDICATED AS PROPOSED LOCATION ONLY. CONFIRM THE EXACT LOCATION AND ROUTING WITH THE ON SITE CLEARWIRE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO STARTING WORK 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND STIPULATED IN THE SPECIFICATION PROJECT SUMMARY. RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE PCS EQUIPMENT, TOWER AREAS, AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO THE CRUSHED STONE APPLICATION. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY. THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRIWNG AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. 7. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND SHALL BE CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING. 8. THE AREAS OF THE CUSTOMER'S PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE BUILDING, DRIVEWAY OR CRUSHED STONE, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED, SEEDED, AND COVERED WITH MULCH AS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE WORK 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318 AND THE SPECIFICATION CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2000 PSI AT 28 DAYS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD UNO. 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH 3 IN. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER #6 AND LARGER - 21N. #5 AND SMALLER 8 WWF 1 112 IN. 5. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: SLAB AND WALL 3/4 IN. BEAMS AND COLUMNS 1 1/2 IN. 6. A 1/2" TROWELED RADIUS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE UNO. HOLES TO RECEIVE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHORS SHALL BE 118" LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD AND SHALL CONFORM TO MFR RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. AVOID CUTTING EXISTING REBAR WHEN DRIWNG HOLES IN THE ELEVATED SLAB. - 7. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSIONM/EDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES. 8. FLOAT SURFACE SHALL BE A SMOOTH FINISH. SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL OBVIOUS DEPRESSIONS. SURFACE SHALL BE LEVEL TO WITHIN t 1°. SURFACE FLATNESS SHALL BE t 1/16" PER YARD. LEGEND AND SYMBOLS: CHAINLINK FENCE 0 . 0 0 CEDAR FENCE ❑ 0 0 ❑ POWER TELCO POWER/TELCO COAX ETHERNET CENTERLINE P T - T/P T/P - COAX EN EN REVISION BUG ELEVATION poi TOP OF ANTENNA EL 0'-0" DETAIL NUMBER ELEVATION VIEW BUG SHEET NUMBER SECTION BUG DETAIL BUG DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER W- NUMBER SHEET NUMBER ABBREVIATIONS: AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AFS ABOVE FINISHED SLAB AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL ALUM ALUMINUM AB ANCHOR BOLT ANGLE ARCH ARCHITECTURAL BTS BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BLDG BUILDING BM BEAM BOT BOTTOM B.O. BOTTOM OF -BOC BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BOS BOTTOM OF STEEL CJ CONTROL JOINT CENTER LINE CLG CEILING CLR CLEAR CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CTR CENTER DIA / 0 DIAMETER DTL DETAIL (E) EXISTING EA ING EACH EJ EXPANSION JOINT ELEC ELECTRIC/ELECTRICAL EL ELEVATION EQ EQUAL EW EACH WAY EXP EXPANSION EXT EXTERIOR FD FLOOR DRAIN FIN FINISH FIN FLR FINISH FLOOR FLR FLOOR FS FAR SIDE FTG FOOTING GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GYP GYPSUM GB GYPSUM BOARD HM HOLLOW METAL HOR HORIZONTAL HR HOUR HT HEIGHT HVAC HEAT NG VENTILATION NC INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR JT JOINT LAM LAMINATED LF LINEAL FOOT MANUF MANUFACTURER MAX MAXIMUM MECH MECHANICAL MH MANHOLE MM MILLIMETER MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS MPH MILES PER HOUR MTL METAL NS NEAR SIDE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NOM NOMINAL NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OH OVERHEAD OPNG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE PLATE PR PAIR PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PT PRESSURE TREATED - RAD RADIUS RD ROOF DRAIN REINF REINFORCED/REINFORCING REQ'D REQUIRED RM ROOM RPW RIGHT OF WAY SCHED SCHEDULE SECT SECTION SF SQUARE FOOT SIM SIMILAR SQ FT SQUARE FOOT SS STAINLESS STEEL STD STANDARD STL STEEL STRUC STRUCTURAL TEMP TEMPORARY THK THICK T.O. TOP OF TOS TOP OF STEEL TOC TOP OF CONCRETE TYP TYPICAL UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERT VERTICAL W/ WITH WWM WELDED WIRE MESH. SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES: SPECIAL INSPECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 2009 SECTION 1704. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL: ❑SHORING INSTALLATION AND MONITORING ❑OBSERVE AND MONITOR EXCAVATION ❑VERIFY SOIL BEARING - psf BEARING ❑SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE PLACEMENT DVERIFY FILL MATERIAL AND COMP ACTION ❑VERIFY CONDITIONS AS ANTICIPATED ❑PILE PLACEMENT (AUGER CAST/DRIVEN PILE) ❑OTHER REINFORCED CONCRETE: DREINFORCING STEEL AND CONCRETE PLACEMENT ❑PRESTRESSED/PRECAST CONCRETE FABRICATION AND ERECTION DBATCH PLANT INSPECTION DSHOTCRETE ❑GROUTING DOTHER STRUCTURAL STEEL: - ❑FABRICATION AND SHOP WELDS ❑ERECTION AND FIELD WELDS AND BOLTING ❑OTHER STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM: ❑ FABRICATION AND SHOP WELDS DERECTION AND FIELD WELDSANDBOLTING ❑OTHER STRUCTURAL MASONRY: DCONTINUOUS ❑PERIODIC OTHER: ANCHORING TO CONCRETE: ❑ BOLTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE ❑ POST -INSTALLATION ADHESIVE ANCHORS OPOST-INSTALLATION MECHANICAL ANCHORS _� CORNERS -II -ONE ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX: 425.487.1734 I EXPIRES 02/15/12 I clearw`re®_ 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOLJTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 0 A NO. 01-04-11 11-23-10 DATE FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR CLIENT REVIEW REVISIONS CEI # 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG - clearw're® AJB JDG MWO GENERAL NOTES BMH JDG MWO BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER DRAWN BY: BMH WA-SEA119S10.5-N01 2 I 1 I I 1 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY I 1 I - 1 _ - _ 1 I I 1 I I ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, TRUE NORTH AND STREET WIDTHS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM EXISTING DRAWINGS AND ARE APPROXIMATE. I I S 89°45'56' E (350.0') I = — _ _ _ _ 1 _ ^ - - �(E) PARKING 1 1 ;F i I I :T1 I I-. Ak J ,,1' 1. 1 S 89°45'58" W (296_3') / r 1` .+iY �� _ ( ^ in J (E) OTHER CARRIER ROOFTOP C - _ PLATFORM W/ EQUIPMENT I APN:643730-0020 / 1 291,927 SQ. FT 11 PROPOSED PANEL I / \ 6.70 ACRES' ANTENNA AND RRU 1 I AITCP Pk I - ^I - (E) PARKING �-' �- 11a61 S�i I I I I I I _ _ I J>T j v "'; �� i PROPOSED REPLACEMENT MICROWAVE ANTENNA (TYP OF 2) / 4'y.r 15 7" (--4-- SOUTHC • S 0°25'58" WI — —_ 4-1 1 IHIIIIIIIIIIII'" -I-I C01.1 I{ C01.1 I' �. (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET _ I MOUNTED ON (E) = I I - ROOFTOP PLATFORM _ 7'-- _ fU - - PROPOSED EQUIPMENT j,i,;I CABINET MOUNTED ON ( li _ �� T — 02.3 - (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM • _'1 - _ I4PEUSE r. \I ll J I 1 I ' - to I — Illllll 11 lllllll IIIIt Ig I +IIIIIH _ HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIt _ — 3" E (211.501 1111I � - — (E) BUILDING , ,. — / m ul _ (E)BUILDING _ t10S-11" 10 1 - ItI1II II1ll1I III^ - - - I _ _ —a !III T IIIIIIIIIIjIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIY� — - a-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIH. �1 - 1- M I I (E) PARKING I . - - 1 ±I I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Y S 89'45'58' W (424.92') . SITE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 1' = 40'-0" - I11x17 SCALE: 1" = 80'-0" - - - NE E0F1NEF:151r0� ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 - - PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX: 425.487.1734 t',yre® /„lA �I �q�,�t i��� clearr w 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA98033 TUKWILADOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 SITE PLAN 0 01.04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER REV WA-SEA119S10.5-001 0 CEI # 10-49057 ' DESIGNED BY: JDG DRAWN BY: BMH I EXPIRES 02/i5N2 - 6 5 4 3 2 D C A RECEl LIAN 06 1011 ��A4 .11-003 (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM PROPOSED ENLARGED ROOFTOP PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 111x17 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0° 3 8'-4" i666®�6�® (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM EXISTING ENLARGED ROOFTOP PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 3/8' =1'-0° J11x17 SCALE: 3/16' = 1'-0' 2 L. PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY l (E)PENTHOUSE (E) COAX SHROUD UP SIDE OF (E) PENTHOUSE (E) OTHER CARRIER ANTENNA ARRAY ENLARGED PENTHOUSE PLAN LI (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU PROPOSED REPLACEMENT MICROWAVE ANTENNA (TYP OF 2) (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (BELOW) (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY (E) STAIRS (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA - (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) RRU (TYP OF 2) (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA 22x34 SCALE: 3/8' = 1-0" 11x17 SCALE: 3/16° = 1'-0" 1 CORNERS9rONE 110"--� ENGINEERING, INC.. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX: 425.4 37.1734 clearw`re® 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA98188 clearw're® 0 01-04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO ENLARGED SITE PLANS NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER REV CEI # 10-49057 - 1 DESIGNED BY: JDG DRAWN BY: BMH WA-SEA119S 10.5-001.1 0 D C B 5 4 3 2 .11-003 RECE R ED IJAN 06 11f CDMAUNITV TOP OF (E) PENTHOUSE 90'-3" AGL • RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA AQL RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA t86'-0" AGL -'RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA 382'-9" AGL TOP OF (E) PARAPET 81'-6` AGL Elk (E) ROOFTOP IF 72'-1"AGL EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA TO BE REMOVED / REPLACED (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU (E) PENTHOUSE (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA t80r3' AGL RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA t88'-0" AGL E ELI 22x34 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0' I11x17 SCALE: 1/16' = 1'-0" (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM GRADE 0'-0' AGL�(2 �'-0" AMSL) LU cxs 1 CORNERS1rONE ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX 425.487.1734 6 ( 5 clearw re® 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND. WA 98033 4 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA98188 clearw're® 0 01-04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER REV CEI # 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG 3 .2 DRAWN BY: BMH WA-SEA119S10.5-0O2 .II-003 0 D C F B A RECEIVED 1JAN 06 2011' COMMUwar n-=+w�O�wi:"aff (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY PROPOSED REPLACEMENT MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA TOP OF (E) PENTHOUSE 90'-3" AGL diRAD CENTER PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA t89'3" AGL aik RAD CENTER PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA 186'-0' AGL _ \ cih RAD CENTER (E) MICROWAVE ANTENNA 4100 382'-9" AGL Ak TOP OF (E) PARAPET 81'-6" AGL $(E) ROOFTOP 72- GL PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 22x34 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 111x17 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU (E) PENTHOUSE (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY Q© RAD CENTER (EI& PROPOSED CLEARWIRE.PANEL ANTENNAS 1:88'3" AGL YIF RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA ±88'-0" AGL NOTE: ANTENNAS, MICROWAVE DISHES, ATTACHMENTS AND COAX TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM 0'-0" AGL (26'-0" AMSL) LlIwOOS 1 NErRS,rGN ENGINEERING, ENGNEERING, INC.. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX: 425.487.1734 clear -ire° 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA1 1 9S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA98188 clearw're® 0 01-04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER REV CEI # 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG DRAWN BY: BMH WA-S EA119S 10.5 -0O2.1 0 D C H B A RECEIVED (JAN 06 2Dfl el1S lq�r c�,-r1ao� _ 4� 5 4 3 ,11-003 (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM (E) BUILDING GRADE 3'-0 AGL (29.-0' AMSL) EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 22x34 SCALE: 1/8" = I11x17 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" -COrRNeRs-TONE ,. ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX 425.487.1734 6 (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA TO BE REMOVED / REPLACED (E) PENTHOUSE (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU almi RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA ±8T-6" AGL RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNAS t86'-6" AGL (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU -(E).CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA TOP OF (E) PENTHOUSE 90'-3` AGL QIF RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA t8�3'-3`AOL RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA t88'-3" AGL RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA t88'-0" AGL // RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA t86-cAGL RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA / t83'-9`7Ci3L_ TOP OF (E) PARAPET 81'-6` AGL 111, (E) ROOFTOP h 72'-1"AGL LL003 clear * ® 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 4 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA1 19S1 0.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA98188 clearw're® 1 0 01-04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO EXISTING EAST ELEVATION NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D CEI # 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG 3 2 DRAWN BY: BMH DRAWING NUMBER WA-SEA11 9S1 0.5-0O2.2 .] 1-003 REV 0 D C RECEIVED fJAN 06 2011, DGO i NOTE: ANTENNAS, MICROWAVE DISHES, ATTACHMENTS AND COAX TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM (E) EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON (E) ROOFTOP PLATFORM (E) BUILDING GRADE 3'-0 AGL (29'-0" AMSL) PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED REPLACEMENT MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) PENTHOUSE (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA ±87'-6" AGL \ \ Elk RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNAS 17, ±86'-6" AGL (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA TOP OF (E) PENTHOUSE ilk 90'-3" AGL RAD CENTER (E) & PROPOSED CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNAS 019"-3" AGL Air RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA Allah t88'-3" AGL _ RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA At ±88'-0" AGL RAD CENTER PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA 386'-0" AGL RAD CENTER (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA Ahik ±82r9" AGL TOP OF (E) PARAPET 81'-6" AGL (E) ROOFTOP 72-1" AGL 1911 L.I1 -00% 22x34 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" CORNERSVONE ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX: 425.487.1734 6 clearwre® 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA98188 clearw're® 1 D 4- 0 01-04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER REV CEI # 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG DRAWN BY: BMH WA-SEA119S 10.5-0O2.3 0 3 2 1 B A RECEIVED rJAN 06 2011' -11-003 cOMMIAMTY DEvELOPIENT PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY 7 � ////� PROPOSED (1) 3" 0 CONDUIT FROM EQUIPMENT CABINET TO ANTENNA r�1 SECTOR 1 4%6" CLR (E) VENT (E) PENTHOUSE (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA - (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA MW (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU PROPOSED REPLACEMENT MICROWAVE ANTENNA (TYP OF 2) .® MW (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (BELOW) (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY (E) OTHER CARRIER ANTENNA ARRAY (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA —� (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA SECTOR 3 SLOPE (E) STAIRS (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA MW (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (BELOW) (E) RRU (TYP OF 2) 44M U '1f0• SECTOR 2 MW MW T (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY (E) OTHER CARRIER ANTENNA ARRAY SECTOR 1 (E) PENTHOUSE (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA SLOPE (E) CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA AND RRU (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA TO BE REMOVED / REPLACED (TYP OF 2) (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (BELOW) (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA ARRAY (E) STAIRS (E) OTHER CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA MW AziMUTH. fof• (E) CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE ANTENNA (BELOW) (E) RRU (TYP OF 2) SECTOR 2 PROPOSED ANTENNA PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 111x17 SCALE: 3/16" =1'-0" CORNERS11"ONE —.." ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX: 425.487.1734 clear r e® 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA 98033 2 EXISTING ANTENNA PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 3/8' =1'-0" j11x17 SCALE: 3/16' = 1'-0" TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 0 A NO. 01-04-11 11-23-10 DATE FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR. CLIENT REVIEW REVISIONS • clearw're° AJB JDG MWO EXISTING & PROPOSED ANTENNA PLANS BMH JDG MWO BY CHK APPD DRAWING NUMBER CEI # 10-49057 1 DESIGNED BY: JDG DRAWN BY: BMH WA-SEA119S10.5-0O3 1 REV 0 D C B A 6 5 3 2 1 RECEIVED [JAN 06 20111 cownuu 1 DEVELOPMENT BRACKETW`�R MOUNT PART #SBWM CLEARWIRE ANTENNA INFORMATION a k OR APPROVED EQUAL 36' MICROWAVE SECTOR ANTENNA BAND # AZIMUTH MODEL QTY. RAD CENTER FT. AGL MECHANICAL DOWNTILT ELECTRICAL TILT _ �)lAi co 4 = PANEL ANTENNA W/ANTENNA HARDWARE (E) STEEL STUD PENTHOUSE WALL 111 TO STD WT ANTENNA PIPE MAST f 1 / RED KATHREIN 1 0° 84010054 2 88'-3" / 88'-0" 0" 3° 1 / RED KATHREIN 1 0° 84010054 1 88'3" 0° 3° iANTENNA P �� ` ` (E)2"OSTDWi PIPE MAST 2 /BLUE KATHREIN 2 110° 84010054 1 8T 6' 0° 3° 1i / 36" MICROWAVE /-ANTENNA 3/WHITE KATHREIN 3 220° 84010054 1 BT 6' 0° 3° - _ ANDREW 18GHz 61° HP3-18 1 89'3" 0° 0° (E) SLIDER BRACKET WALL MOUNT (E) STEEL STUD ANDREW 18 GHz 50° HP3-18 1 86 -0' 0° 0° RADIOWAVES 7.5 GHz TBD TBD 1 82-9" 0° 0° L3x3x3/16x7.6" W/ (2) 5/8'0 A307 PER BRACKET 4x4 BLOCKING i I 0 RRU W/ MOUNTINGiq HARDW' O ANDREW 5.5 GHz 101° PX2F-52 1 89-3" 0° 0° PENTHOUSE WALL (E) 24" MICROWAVE ANTENNA ANDREW 23 GHz 159° VHLP1-23 1 - 87-6' 0° p^ ANDREW 5.5 GHz 170° PX2F-52 1 89'-3' 0° 0° - - - - - - _ - LABEL MARKINGS SHALL BE PLACED AT: 1. WITHIN 12' OF CABLE AT BOTH ENDS 2. AT/NEAR TOWER MGB - - 3. EITHER PRIOR TO ENTRY INTO THE CABINET FOR A CABLE SUPPORT BRIDGE `COORDINATE BACKHAUL INSTALLATION WITH FINAL ENGS - ANTENNA SCHEDULE 8 PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTING 7 MICROWAVE ANTENNA MOUNTING 6 22x34 SCALE: NTS I11x17 SCALE: NTS 22x34 SCALE: 3/4" =1'-0" 11x17 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 22x34 SCALE: 3/4" =1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 3/8" =1'-0" .. .. - - - - - - - - - - - _ MANUFACTURER: ANDREW MODEL #.HP3-18 DIAMETER 36' WEIGHT: 351bs ='= m,........„.....,....,....\\ Ai 3-0" V-2 3/4' 61/4" III1IIII1IIII1IIIIII1II1I \,� y :I - 1 1 1 1 FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW BACK VIEW io , IhIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI . - U U UG.]U L 1 -le _ ANTENNA - TOP VIEW -KATHREIN 84010054 NOT USED 5 NOT USED 4 MICROWAVE ANTENNA DETAIL 3 HUAWEI RRU DETAIL 2 PANEL ANTENNA DE IL 22x34 SCALE: NTS I11x17 SCALE: NTS 22x34 SCALE: NTS I11x17 SCALE: NTS 22x34 SCALE: 1" =1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 1/2" _ ,'-0" 22x34 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 3/4' = 1'-0" 22x34 SCALE: 3/4" _ ,'-0- I11x17 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" COr'iNEe�S'IrONE ��� ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA98072 PHONE:425.487.1732-FA425.487.1734 FAX • �W�,,c i s" W ���• ,�: ,/ /�9 ( C1eaY' - �/.�+ s gw� »ya ® i e - - 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND•WA98033 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 • clearw re° ANTENNA DETAILS 0 01-04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER REV WA-SEA11 9S1 0.5-004 0 CEI # 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG DRAWN BY: BMH I EXPIRES D2n5/12 I D C B A RECEIVED GAN 06 2D11l 5 .I1-003 Calmvxm DEVELOPMENT tow., 1 1 1 I • I. • • FRESH AIR EXHAUST \ 0 AIR INTAKE o IR EXHAUST FRESH AIR . INTAKE • • Ym FRESH AIR EXHAUST w UTILITY BOX w LL FRESH AIR INTAKE \ FRESH AIR INTAKE l,al 3/4"0 MALE NPT CONDUIT DEMARK ACCESS 3/4'0 MALE NPT CONDUIT DEMARK 1 1/2"0 MALE NPT CONDUIT UTILITY ACCESS ACCESS 1 112'ID MALE NPT CONDUIT UTILITY ACCESS f ... 1 1/2"0 UTILITY 3/4"0 MALE DEMARK MALE NPT CONDUIT ACCESS NPT CONDUIT ACCESS SITE SUPPORT CABINET ELEVATION 7 SITE SUPPORT CABINET ELEVATION 6 SITE SUPPORT CABINET ELEVATION 5 SITE SUPPORT CABINET ELEVATION 4 22x34 SCALE: 1" =1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 1/2" =1'-0" 22x34 SCALE: 1" =1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 1/2" =1'-0" 22x34 SCALE: 1" =1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 1/2° =1'-0" 22x34 SCALE: 1" =1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" EQUIPMENT CABINET 1/2"ID A307 BOLT (TYP OF 4 PER CABINET) (E) GRATING 3/4"0 HOLE (TYP OF 4) 1 DRILL AND INSTALL ANCHOR BOLTS PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL 5'-6" 1'-11 1/2" 0 0 - ` FRESH AIR EXHAUST \ \ \I CV r - I / MOUNTING HOLE (E) W BEAM / LOCATION N 0 i / • \ \ \ \ 2'-2" - 3/4"0 MALE NPT CONDUIT DEMARK ACCESS UTILITY BOX 1 1/2"0 MALE NPT CONDUIT UTILITY ACCESS FRESH AIR INTAKE gh CABINET ANCHORAGE 3 NOT USED 2 EQUIPMENT CABINET 22x34 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" 111x17 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 22x34 SCALE: NTS I11x17 SCALE: NTS 22x34 SCALE: 3' = 1'-0" I11x17 SCALE: 1 1/2" =1'-0" COr�NEr�51rONE -� ENGINEERING, INC. 16928 WOODINVILLE REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 210 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 PHONE: 425.487.1732 FAX:425.487.1734 w.o" e , ; eke� :lh�r OWE 9 It q/� clear b �KWILA ® 4400 CARILLON POINT KIRKLAND, WA98033 TUKWILA DOUBLETREE WA-SEA119S10.5 16500 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA, WA 98188 clearwre® 1 EQUIPMENT DETAILS 0 01-04-11 FOR CONSTRUCTION AJB JDG MWO A 11-23-10 FOR CLIENT REVIEW BMH JDG MWO , NO. DATE REVISIONS BY CHK APP'D DRAWING NUMBER REV WA-SEA119S10.5-005 0 CEI # 10-49057 I DESIGNED BY: JDG DRAWN BY: BMH I EXPIRES 02n5/12 I B A RECEIVED 1JAN 06 20111 6 4