HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL11-006 - TARGET - DESIGN REVIEWTARGET
301 STRANDER BLVD
PLI 1-006
LII-013
ADMIN DESIGN
REVIEW -MINOR MOD
•
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director
April 14, 2011
David Contreras
MulvannyG2 Architects
601 SW Second Avenue, Suite 1200
Portland Oregon 97204
Subject: Target Minor Modifications (File L11-013)
Original file Tukwila Pond Design Review (File 88-12-DR)
Dear David:
Thank you for the minor modification application and Sheet G002 depicting the proposed changes
associated with the current project. Based upon the plans and information submitted in connection with
your request for minor modification of the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approval, I hereby
approve the proposed changes subject to some additional conditions listed at the end of this letter.
BACKGROUND
The BAR approved on January 11 1989, the Tukwila Pond project subject to conditions. In 2002, the City
approved a minor modification requested by Target that included painting the decorative grid work and
the addition of a metal canopy and new precast column covers at the entryway.
The City received your request for a second minor modification to the approved design on February 28,
2011.
COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL APPROVED
DESIGN
1. Site Plan
There are no significant changes to the site layout. Minor changes to the loading area in the southwest
corner of the building are proposed to accommodate a new trash compactor. See further discussion below.
2. Building Design
a) Architectural Design Quality and Relationship to Surroundings
There are no major changes in the overall architectural quality of the building's design, the variety of
detail, the building form or the building's siting.
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665
b) Materials and Colors:
Painting the steel decorative elements in a lighter color would be appropriate given that the proposal more
closely matches the color of this element throughout the rest of the project. In addition to painting the
steel structure over the main entry the metal decorative work over the columned pilasters along the east
facade should also occur.
c.) Exterior Fixtures, Standards, and Accessories
The significant element of the proposal relating to this criterion is the removal of top tier steel structure
over the building's public entrance. The original design review file and the 2002 minor modification, at
which time a similar request was made regarding the steel decorative motif, have been reviewed. The
metal grid and framework and in particular the pyramidal shape is a unifying decorative element of the
center as well as of the Target building that continues along three of its sides.
The current design proposal includes the addition of two spherical concrete bollards painted red adjacent
to the entry. These bollards are not a significant change to the overall design scheme. This is a minor new
element that is being proposed that will not detract from the existing materials, colors or decorative
themes.
3. Landscaping
There are no landscaping changes proposed.
4. Miscellaneous Structures
Overall the design of the miscellaneous structures and site furnishings shall be consistent with the
architectural concept and the landscape design. The original application states that: "All mechanical
equipment will be screened. Garbage dumpsters will be screened or hidden within the building structure."
A tour of the site shows that no rooftop mechanical equipment is viewable from the adjacent streets or
from the subject site.
New rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed. The applicant has relocated the largest of the units to a
more central location and according to the dimensions shown on the plan, the equipment is one foot eight
inches taller than the rooftop parapet. The current rooftop mechanical equipment is six inches taller than
the rooftop parapet. Cross sections and visual studies have been done from the north side of the adjacent
street — Strander B1. and from the development's parking lot, indicating that the equipment is not likely to
be seen although given the scale of the drawings it is difficult to positively confirm. See sheet G002. The
original project stated that all rooftop equipment would be screened.
The applicant also proposes enlarging and modifying the trash compactor, adding bollards, and modifying
the compactor's opening/connection on the west facade in the loading dock. There is no other area in the
loading dock that is used for recycled materials.
The City of Tukwila has a requirement that all commercial buildings provide recycling storage space
(18.52.080 Tukwila Municipal Code). The collection point shall be located in a manner so that hauling
Page 2 of 3
trucks do not obstruct pedestrian or vehicles on site. If Target is expanding and modifying its trash
collection then recycling should be brought up to code.
DECISION
The proposed revisions to the approved design are considered minor modifications as permitted under
18.60.030 (E). This request for minor modification to the BAR approved design is approved subject to the
following conditions.
1. Prior to the issuance of the building permit the applicant shall revise the drawings to show
retention of the grid work over the entrance.
2. Prior to the issuance of the building permit the applicant shall provide a site plan that shows
compliance with recycling space standard (TMC 18.52.080.)
3. The applicant shall be responsible for ensuring the rooftop mechanical equipment is screened
from the public view per the visual study (Sheet G002)
APPEAL PROCESS
This decision is a Type 1 decision that may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner. The Permit
Application Types and Procedures chapter of the City's Zoning Code, Classification of Project Permit
Applications section (18104.010(B), outlines the authorization and process for appeal. If you have any
questions, you can contact Moira Bradshaw at 206-431-3651.
Sincerely,
ack Pace
Director Community Development
H:\target\Target minor modification Decision.doc
Page 3 of 3
TARGET.
T0627 Recycling Program Overview
Located at the front of the T0627 store, three recycling stations will offer guests a convenient way to
recycle aluminum, glass and plastic beverage containers, plastic bags, MP3 players, cell phones and ink
cartridges. A full description of recyclables that are accepted is available at Target.com/eco-friendly.
The guest -facing containers are only a component of this store's overall recycling program. T0627 also
has recycling programs that responsibly dispose of corrugated cardboard, plastic shrink wrap, office
paper, and bottle/can recycling for team members.
Office paper is removed from the pharmacy and office area and recycled using a 3rd party service
provider. The store's pharmacy has two 32 gallon secure containers for recycling. T0627 has a 32 gallon
secure container in the office for paper recycling and a 23 gallon bottle/can recycling bin in the break
room for team members.
Target leverages at least one baler per store for baling corrugated cardboard in the backroom.
Additionally, each store has two pallet spaces dedicated to staging the recycled bottles/cans and the
shrink wrap/plastic shopping bags. These materials are removed from the store using Target's reverse
supply chain, consolidated at a Target Distribution Center and then recycled leveraging a variety of
vendors depending on the recyclable material type. This constant removal of recycled material from our
store allows Target to avoid having any significant dedicated space in the backroom for storage of
recycled material.
As previously mentioned, Target has 3 containers dedicated at the front of each store that offer guests a
place to recycle plastic shopping bags, cans/bottles, and small electronics including ink cartridges. The
containers are each approximately 24" square and 34" tall and hold approximately 35 gallons of
material.
Please direct any questions regarding the recycling program at this Target location to:
Brock Burkett
Resource Recovery Manager
612.761.2140
Brock.Burkett@Target.com
1000 Nlcollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55403
Target • Target.com • Target Financial Ser vices • TCI • Target Sourcing Ser vices
Page 1 of 2
Moira Bradshaw - RE: Tukwila Target
From: David Contreras
To: Moira Bradshaw
Date: 03/28/2011 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: Tukwila Target
Moira,
I just double checked the distance from the face of building and I will need to correct this on the plans but
section 4 calls for distance 496 ft before the units can actually be viewed from the Strander side of the
building. This needs to be revised to 742 ft. Section 5 can also be revised to 743 ft. These number show
complete screening of the new units until the individual is standing at the distances provided. I hope this helps
with your findings.
Thanks and have a great day,
David Contreras I Associate I MulvannyG2 Architecture 1971.998.1451
From: Moira Bradshaw[mailto:mbradshaw@ci.tukwila.wa.us]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 9:56 AM
To: David Contreras
Subject: RE: Tukwila Target
Hi Dave - I printed out the attachment and see the relocation of the equipment on the #5 moving the
equipment further west. The #3 elevation shows two pieces of equipment that I assume are new. Would you
please give me the height above the parapet? Is this extension above the parapet the same on the north
facade? Can you tell me why it can't be lowered?
Thanks for your efforts on this,
Moira Carr Bradshaw, AICP
Senior Planner, DCD
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100
Tukwila WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431 3651
www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
"The materials of city planning are sky, space, trees, steel and cement, in that order and in that hierarchy." Le
Corbusier
»> On 03/25/2011 at 1:41 PM, in message
<E0F40A308AD3494D8C546993C31F30DB082EA9D564@MG2Mail01.interne l.mulvannyg2.com>, David
Contreras <David.Contreras@MulvannyG2.com> wrote:
file://C:\temt\XPGrWise\4D906123tuk-mai16300-no 10016470361235E 1... 04/05/2011
Page 2 of 2
Hi Moira,
My team has been working on screening the roof top units from view. We have relocated the units so now
we have a greater distance then before. Please review and let me know if this acceptable and shows
compliance with comment #5.
Thanks and have a great weekend,
David Contreras I Associate I MulvannyG2 Architecture ( 971.998.1451
From: Moira Bradshaw [mailto:mbradshaw@ci.tukwila.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:50 AM
To: David Contreras
Subject: Tukwila Target
Hi David - Good talking with you today. Attached are some more pictures of relevant details regarding the
current improvement proposal. I'm also summarizing our discussion:
1. paint will need to include paint out of all brown gridwork including the decorative elements along entire
east facade. (see photos below of other east facade elements)
2. recycling needs to be included in project - 5 square feet per 1000 square feet of gross retail area.
3. a window onto pond would enhance the food court by: allowing natural light into this area of the store;
providing a view of a natural area and public park;
4. The removal of the grid work was proposed in 2002 and not approved because it is one of the unifying
design elements and a characteristic feature throughout Target's project - including their freestanding sign.
5. The new roof top element needs to be screened or located to minimize its visibility.
Thanks for your time speaking with me. Let's talk again when you've had a chance to coordinate with your
Target contacts and review the plans.
Kind regards,
Moira Carr Bradshaw, AICP
Senior Planner, DCD
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100
Tukwila WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431 3651
www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
"The materials of city planning are sky, space, trees, steel and cement, in that order and in that hierarchy."
Le Corbusier
file://C:\temp\XPGrpWise\4D906123tuk-mai16300-po 10016470361235E1... 04/05/2011
Page 1 of 1
Moira Bradshaw - RE: Tukwila Target
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Attachments:
David Contreras
Moira Bradshaw
03/25/2011 1:43 PM
RE: Tukwila Target
Hi Moira,
My team has been working on screening the roof top units from view. We have relocated the units so now we have a
greater distance then before. Please review and let me know if this acceptable and shows compliance with comment #5.
Thanks and have a great weekend,
David Contreras 1 Associate MulvannyG2 Architecture 1971.998.1451
From: Moira Bradshaw [mailto:mbradshaw@ci.tukwila.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:50 AM
To: David Contreras
Subject: Tukwila Target
Hi David - Good talking with you today. Attached are some more pictures of relevant details regarding the current
improvement proposal. I'm also summarizing our discussion:
1. paint will need to include paint out of all brown gridwork including the decorative elements along entire east facade. (see
photos below of other east facade elements)
2. recycling needs to be included in project - 5 square feet per 1000 square feet of gross retail area.
3. a window onto pond would enhance the food court by: allowing natural light into this area of the store; providing a view
of a natural area and public park;
4. The removal of the grid work was proposed in 2002 and not approved because it is one of the unifying design elements
and a characteristic feature throughout Targets project - including their freestanding sign.
5. The new roof top element needs to be screened or located to minimize its visibility.
Thanks for your time speaking with me. Lets talk again when you've had a chance to coordinate with your Target
contacts and review the plans.
Kind regards,
Moira Carr Bradshaw, AICP
Senior Planner, DCD
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100
Tukwila WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431 3651
www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
'The materials of city planning are sky, space, trees, steel and cement, in that order and in that hierarchy." Le Corbusier
file://C:\temn\XPGrDWise\4D8C9BEBtuk-mai16300-no 10016470361235 A _ _ _ 04/05/2011
Page 1 of 1
Moira Bradshaw - RE: Tukwila Target
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Attachments:
David Contreras
Moira Bradshaw
03/16/2011 10:53 AM
RE: Tukwila Target
Moira,
I attached the revised sight line study showing actual unit heights as provided by my engineers. The distances have
increased nearly doubling the sight line from previous submitted drawing. Please review and comment as necessary.
Thanks,
David Contreras I Associate I MulvannyG2 Architecture 1971.998.1451
From: Moira Bradshaw [mailto:mbradshaw@ci.tukwila.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:50 AM
To: David Contreras
Subject: Tukwila Target
Hi David - Good talking with you today. Attached are some more pictures of relevant details regarding the current
improvement proposal. I'm also summarizing our discussion:
1. paint will need to include paint out of all brown gridwork including the decorative elements along entire east facade. (see
photos below of other east facade elements)
2. recycling needs to be included in project - 5 square feet per 1000 square feet of gross retail area.
3. a window onto pond would enhance the food court by: allowing natural light into this area of the store; providing a view
of a natural area and public park;
4. The removal of the grid work was proposed in 2002 and not approved because it is one of the unifying design elements
and a characteristic feature throughout Target's project - including their freestanding sign.
5. The new roof top element needs to be screened or located to minimize its visibility.
Thanks for your time speaking with me. Lets talk again when you've had a chance to coordinate with your Target
contacts and review the plans.
Kind regards,
Moira Carr Bradshaw, AICP
Senior Planner, DCD
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100
Tukwila WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431 3651
www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
'The materials of city planning are sky, space, trees, -steel and cement, in that order and in that hierarchy." Le Corbusier
file://C:\temn\XPGroWise\4D80969Btuk-mai16300-Do 1001647036123413... 04/05/2011
CCity of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Phone:206-431-3670
Fax: 206-431-3665
Web site: http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
RECEIPT
Parcel No.: 2623049005 Permit Number: L11-013
Address: 301 STRANDER BL TUKW Status: PENDING
Suite No: Applied Date: 02/28/2011
Applicant: CONTRERAS, DAVID Issue Date:
Receipt No.: R11-00359
Initials:
User ID:
JR
1659
Payment Amount: $543.00
Payment Date: 02/28/2011 10:45 AM
Balance: $0.00
Payee: MULVANNY G2 ARCHITECTURE
TRANSACTION LIST:
Type Method Descriptio Amount
Payment Check 078875 543.00
Authorization No.
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Description
Account Code Current Pmts
ZONING/SUBDIVISION
000.345.810 543.00
Total: $543.00
doc: Receiot-06 Printed: 02-28-2011
CITY OF TUKWILA ���TRATIVE
Department of Community
Development
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcent r Boulevard, T Tukwila, WA 98188 FEB 2
cow
IGN D IGN
r
DEVELOP T
e u aa, IEW
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail.: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us
APPLICATION
FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P-DR
Planner:
File Number: l✓( ( —
Q t3
Application Complete
(Date:
)
Project File Number:
.Pt_ l ( _0 0 (p
Application Incomplete
(Date:
)
Other File Numbers:
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: ) - o 2-
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection.
301 5-r'e-a-i., DE 3Lvp
LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement).
26. 23041605
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping
development standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name:
Address:
Phone:
E-mail:
T7 12 Co rim?S
.oI St., 2"6. A-ti Bute I24a to,�� L. , OR- 972.4
(9ii) 998- 145( FAX: (97r) Zr'7-o�zz
12,v,D.Cot+T2cF.A5e.#4u1_444414442•coH
Signature:
Date: z-/Zz) r
CITY OF TUKWILA DESIGN
Department of Community Dever : • N , RREVIEW-
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, ,:: J. _A,DMINISTRAT IVE
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 43 6 $ 2
E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us
INFORMATION
City of Tukwila design review combines specific standards, design criteria and illustrative design guidelines to
require that all developments reflect a high level of design quality. Tukwila has two design review processes;
one for projects that require a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, and one for smaller
projects that are approved administratively by the DCD Director.
This application packet is for administrative design review.
REQUIREMENTS: Administrative approval is required for the following types of development:
A. New Development or Redevelopment beyond the Existing Exterior Walls
1. Multi -family or hotel/motel building additions up to 1,500 s.f.
2. All commercial and industrial development in various zones, when up to a certain size as follows:
•
MUO, 0 and RCM zoned buildings between 1,500 and 5,000 s.f.
•
In the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor RC zoned structures up to 1,500 s.f., outside
of the TIB corridor RC zoned structures between 1,500 and 5,000 s.f.
•
TUC zoned buildings between 1,500 and 2,500 s.f. except those with multi -family units
•
NCC and RCC zoned developments up to 1.500 s.f.
•
C/LI and TVS zoned buildings between 1,500 and 10,000 s.f.
3. All development in LI, HI, MIC/L, MIC/H and TVS located within 300' of a residential zone.
4. All development in LI, HI, MIC/L, MIC/H and TVS located within 200 feet of the Green River.
B. Exterior Repair, Reconstruction, Cosmetic Alterations or Improvements
1. Any exterior repairs, alterations or improvements, if the cost of that work is between 10 and 25% of the
building's assessed value:
• in the MUO, 0, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC and C/LI districts, for sites with more than 10,000
g.s.f. of building area and
• all sites in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor zoned NCC, MUO or RC.
2. Developments with a previous approved design may make minor changes with Department approval.
All other changes require new design review.
C. Proposed Development Standard Waivers
The DCD Director may reduce landscape and building setbacks for Projects in the
Tukwila International Boulevard corridor in the MUO, NCC, and RC zones.
D. Minor Modification to an approved Board of Architectural Review decision
PROCEDURES: At the time you submit your application you must have all of the items listed on the attached
"Complete Application Checklist." You may request a waiver from items on the checklist that are not
applicable to your project. Please discuss this waiver request with City staff either at a pre -application
meeting or at the time of application submittal. Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff will
determine if it is complete based on the attached checklist. If not complete City staff will mail you a letter
outlining what additional information is needed. If you do not submit requested materials within 90 days from the
City's request for additional information the City may cancel your application.
Staff will meet with you as needed, to help achieve project goals, and formulate a recommendation to the Director.
Once all design issues have been resolved we will issue a Notice of Decision. This approval will expire unless
construction begins within three years of the decision.
COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST
The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public
Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that
certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is
determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED.
The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may
require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards.
City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community
Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works).
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required.
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning
APPLICATION MATERIALS:
/
1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application.
Jl
2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies).
A
3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17".
)L
4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule.
X
5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter
Property (1 copy attached).
6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet)
PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS:
7. If the project requires SEPA review:
Payment of a $365 notice board fee to Fast Signs Tukwila or
Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a
complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout).
Mailed notice is not required.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS:
8. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is
exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet).
9. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional
plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are
available at the DCD office.
i(
10. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application)
11. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if
needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report
Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at
www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/dcd•lan.htm for additional information.
SITE PLAN:
12 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size
24" x 36".
(b) Existing and proposed building footprints.
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required.
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning
(c) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines.
(d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards.
(e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles.
(f) Loading and service areas.
(g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors and materials.
(h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks.
(i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street.
(j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50%).
(k) Show all existing and proposed easements.
(1) Vicinity Map with site location does not have to be to scale.
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
13 (a) If the landscaping will be altered or the existing landscaping does not meet current
standards (TMC 18.52) provide a landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed
landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State
registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity,
spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36".
(b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for
example fencing at drip line).
SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN (If the project will affect any sensitive areas):
14 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20%, coal mine areas
and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and
proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood
elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36".
(b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures.
(c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade),
indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for
removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer.
(d) Existing and proposed building footprints.
CIVIL PLANS (If utility or site work is proposed):
15 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed
professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36".
(b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations
to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area.
(c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals.
(d) Total expected cut and fill.
(e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water,
sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of
purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth,
valve locations or the like are needed.
(f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface
Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including
feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious
surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features,
detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact
Public Works or go to www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/pubwks/pwpermit.htm#techinfo.
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required,
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning
(g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants.
(h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps.
(i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements.
(j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds.
OTHER:
16. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show
mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. Maximum size 24" x 36".
17. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project.
18. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is suggested. If submitted it
must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the
sidewalk).
19. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting if any changes to the
existing fixtures are proposed. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-
candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare.
20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations.
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us
RSCEIVED
511282#1A
p,0R
GO��WNi�
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS
PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows:
1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application.
2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent.
4. Owner grants the Cityy its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real
property, located at .501 Strander Blvd. , Tukwila, WA 98188
for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose.
5. Owner agrees to hold the City hannless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the
City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City.
6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without
refund of fees. �� �!�
Minn[ AC, (city), P1/� " (state), on 1/ PG6nd?rti , 20 1
EXECUTED at
KATHLEEN M. OTTUM
NOTARY PUBUC•MINNESOTA
My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2015
ss
1Ztthare( S. f !'gs Ice
(Print Name) 5. {O'f 4. st. .54)
5V tie.
406 LS 1 J,iJ " J
(Address)
4,(Z-76(- /538
(Phone Number)
a (Signature)/��
On this day personally appeared before me 7 leolo ,L'�+ $ .'N� me known to be the individual who executed
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes
mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME OHIS ` %
6 DAY OF , 20! /
•
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of. H..,L;..bh,.. )4 j 11 meC id tux_
residing at 34) Aore.4.4 4.4. Its
—7"rudP,a" i ,►,tltu 56 53/
My Commission expires on �� ,z /.
C
LL
MULVANNY<
G2
DESIGN AT WORK
Jaimie Reavis
City of Tukwila — Assistant Planner
6300 South Center Blvd, St 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re:
T-0627 South Center Target
301 Strander Blvd
Tukwila, WA 98188
Plan Review # D10-317
Subject: Minor Modification Review
Dear Ms. Reavis:
Reco E
FEB 2 8 20ii
cetWAUKITY
�C.QT
This is a proposed minor modification submittal for exterior enhancement to the existing Target store
located on 301 Strander Boulevard. The drawing provided shows proposed exterior enhancements to the
front entry facade steel feature. We propose to remove the top tier element of this facade feature and cap
at the top of parapet as illustrated per sheet G002. Red spherical bollards are also proposed as a new
sidewalk features.
The store will continue to show features to that of the surrounding buildings. There is no paint color
changes proposed and the signage will remain unchanged. The smaller tier features located on the front
and east side of the Target store will remain unchanged and shows minor modifications to the stores
exterior enhancements.
Should you require any additional information regarding this matter, please contact me at 971-998-1451.
Sincerely,
David Contreras I Associate 1 MulvannyG2 Architecture 1 971.998.1451
503.223.8030
503.223.8381
601 SW SECOND AVENUE 1 SUITE 1200 I PORTLAND, 0R 1 97204
MulvannyG2.com
0
MULVANNY
G2
DESIGN AT WORK
Jaimie Reavis
City of Tukwila — Assistant Planner
6300 South Center Blvd, St 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re:
T-0627 South Center Target
301 Strander Blvd
Tukwila, WA 98188
Plan Review # D10-317
RECEIVED
FEB 2 8 2011'
�3Y
Subject: Plan Review Response
Dear Ms. Reavis:
Please find below our response to plan review comments dated 12/15/10. Please find the original
comment followed by our response in bold.
1. The design of this building was approved through design review. The changes in the design of the building
exterior will required you to apply for a minor modification to the approved design review, per Tukwila
Municipal Code section 18.60.030 (E). The minor modification must be reviewed and approved by the
Department of Community Development prior to issuance of the building permit.
Response: Please see the attached minor modification submittal which includes application, fee for
review and attached half size drawing. Also, included is a 11x17 color sheet for reference to the
spherical bollards proposed at this store.
2. Please include a sight distance diagram as a revision to the building permit, to illustrate how the proposed
rooftop equipment will be screened from view.
Response: See attached sheet G002 illustrating the rooftop units are properly screened.
Should you require any additional information regarding this matter, please contact me at 971-998-1451.
Sincerely,
David Contreras I Associate I MulvannyG2 Architecture 1971.998.1451
503.223,8030
503.223.8381
601 SW SECOND AVENUE I SUITE 1200 I PORTLAND, OR 1 97204
MulvannyG2.com
297 Strander Boulevard - Google Maps Page 1 of 1
Googte maps
,:A- c tw - - I I
Address 297 Strander Boulevard
Address is appropmete
321 Strander Blvd Landscaping
G ilt6V
1).1
http ://maps . google. com/maps?q=3 21 +strander+blvd& ie=UTF 8 &h1=en&h... 02/ 18/2 011
EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
1.9i9 2.5
'EXIST BULLSEYE
'& TARGET LETTERS
j
,<-A_
1 -11--F-n
CONCRETE SPERICAL
BOLLARDS - SEE(
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
DEMO TOP TIER
STEEL STRUCTURE
ic4.5
i EXIST. PHARMACY
SIGNAGE
I / 1
MAR
VI6'=V-0'
kM e>s
1.9 2.5 T 3.5 n 4.5
I I I I I I
(E) ROOF UNIT
& WALK PAD
ID ROOF UNIT
& WALK PAD
PROPOSED SPHERICAL BOLLARD
/\
rnr
a 0 0
(7 10
I I
I I
i 0 0 0
• 0\
(E) ROOF UNIT
& WALK PAD
I I ;
I I1
(0 ROOF UNIT
& WALK PAD
A
RECEIVED
FEB 2 8 20111
COMMUNITY
DEyELOPME IT
BUILDING PLAN, SECTIOWSITE LINES STUDY
N6'=1'-0'
Ut31%
MLLL.VAN.N1,G2
601 SW SECOfO AVENUE I SUITE 1200
PORTLAND. CR IIrr2C4
tbf. G2.wm 1 E5032218030 116DSmw1
BRIAN R. FLEENER -ARCHITECT
(N) ROOF TOP
COMPRESSOR RACK
(N) REFRIGERATION
PIPE BOX
O✓•IE 01l
6n NOVMSER 2010
isArs ND tFA00W
HMOPE10IfSEf
PAWN r
RFWIA
ocom n
D.CONDERAS
IL RUSH
MOCK% 1[11(R No.
10m654
Artvile
OR-FEB-201113:52
EYE LEVEL
EL= 5'-0'
r ABOVE GRAD
WNW stag
SOUTH CENTER
WA
5101E
T0627
xiva+
MR2010_08
mu
SIGNAGE STUDY
.
.'
301 STRANDER BLVD
270627
LL
TUKWILA WA 98188
A
G002
T-0627 SOUTH CENTER, WA
1 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
@ O2 2.5
p �TpRGETLLETEFAS
DEIa nw
sTEEI srTDP RucTURe �� \///�����/
3.5 1 a) 4:5 T
/r51
PHARIYA
CONCRETE Vet CAL
® PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
G
1.8 0 2.5 O3
t:wKPOT
3.5 n 9.5
IEI SPOOF eN
6 PLR PAD
BUILDING PLAN, SECTIOWSITE LINES STUDY
0 0
0
N6'1'-0'
0
0
0 0
61N2LN ,1
1-117 I� 1
,44
0 01
BUILDING PLAN, SECTIOWSITE LINES STUDY
MULVANNYG2_.
w.e,ptm 1,000aee020 I rwmnt
BFWl R. FLED., • AllettRECT
\\10.9.0.13VochemolVlachK2\vE1008 TGTCADAF\Rarodels 0627WA SMh Cent RLMi •CAD\5ympe SNd,\06270201 ddp,uMS.,.dpn
QTARG ET
0
(L)
(N) ROOF TOP
COMPRESSOR RACK
(N) REFRIGER•TION
PIPE BOX
ACTUAL DISTANCE FOR
PARAPET SCREENING AT 5'
EYE LEVEL DISTANCE.
lee OIL
11.10
MAW Et
10106.1
25-0MR-201113:25
550'-0'
ACTUAL DISTANCE FOR
PARAPET SCREENING AT 5'
EYE LEVEL DISTANCE.
KEY PLAN
SOUTH CENTER
T0627
M0.2010_013
WA
-w-
SIGNAGE STUDY
-„-
301 STRANDER BLVD
270627
LL
TUKWILA WA 98188
0 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
,e1/4304PROPOSED SPHERICAL BOLLARD
OEMO TOP TRR
STFEL STRIICTUPF 1.9 /� /) O2 2.5 03.5 L a) 9.5 i
I `T' `�
GRT. BULlSETE SIGXLGEI '""
AROET ETT
PHAROIAC
�COAORETE SPEICAL
p9uARus - sEE�
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
O2 2:5 \.$) (:5
i i I i
A I NEk PRO �� A ION
O
a
a
0
IEl ROOF PADUh1T
A IIALA
BUILDING PLAN, SECTIOWSITE LINES STUDY
116'-1'-0
O 0 0 0 O 0 0
BUILDING PLAN, SECTIOWSITE LINES STUDY
146'-1'-0
MULW\IN_NY1_ 2
mAwAmm° I1mtmAm 11Au0m.n1
O:\Romod.b\0627_WA_South_Cangr RLAn .CAD\&gnopo Study \06270201 40pnrrvlsn.dpn
SPAR R. PLUMP -ARCHITECT
QTARG ET
(N) ROOF TOP
COMPRESSOR RACK
(N) REFRIGERATION
PIPE BOX
496'-0'
ACTUAL DISTANCE FOR •
PARAPET SCREENING AT 5'
EYE LEVEL DISTANCE.
297'-0'
ACTUAL DISTANCE FOR
PARAPET SCREENING AT 5'
EYE LEVEL DISTANCE.
0.0
uodovasmma
.10
0.14101.21
.o<a ne
cleMdc
16-MAR-2011 09:28
SOUTH CENTER
T0627
MR201008
WA
SIGNAGE STUDY
--
301 BRANDER BLW
270627
LL
TUKWILA WA 98188
o
GO 1 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
PROPOSED SPHERICAL BOLLARD
STEII STW CTURE
/�
1.9 l [/� ) 0CN / 3.5 l a) 9 OS
4nr/T.R £i LEETETEI(s I/ `l // Eracr""cr
0 10
11.IRAm6BACV
iE Sl i l !tl li.9l�
ammo ]name
-
cos - SSE LL_
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
T.9 0 25 0 3.5 O 9.5
1921 PAD W!i eJWO(F Wt RJ ROBE UMT
PAO AlS m \ MLLk PAO
Q
11,1 P50
-11
BUILDING PLAN, SECTION/SITE LINES STUDY
1000 NICOIIET MAIL
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55003
_Mu viv(NyA f2
wr wsBc ronliwo oxlmani
Riwn.-¢In I1634EIRCIJ lxammnl 1.
O:\Remodels\C627 WA South CcMcr RL.A8I.oCAD\Nonoon 51udy\06270201 de,lorvMrn.dgn
BRIAR R. FLEENER-ARwrrem
QTARG ET
(N) ROOF TOP
COMPRESSOR RACK
IN) REFRIGERATION
PIPE BOX
EYE LEVEL
EL= 5'-0"
ABOVE GRAD
4,0111104.
dodd0
08-FE6201113:52
L 1-01
SOUTH CENTER
T0627
MR2010_06
WA
SIGNAGE STUDY
—.a
n ..,—,
301 STRANDER BLVD
270627
LL
TUKWILA WA 98188
G002
RECEIVED
FEB 2 8 2011
CDEVELOPMENT