Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL11-039 - ADAM PAUL / LI RONG FENG - TREE PERMITRONG FENG LI SHORT PLAT 4066 S 128TH ST PLI 1-039 LII-048 SHORT PLAT City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director December 23, 2011 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Adam Paul, Applicant and Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: LI 1-048 Applicant: Adam Paul Type of Permit Applied for: Tree Clearing Permit Project Description: Removal of three significant trees on a steep slope. The applicant will plant mitigation trees on the same property. Location: 4066 S. 128th Street. Associated Files: L09-052 (Short Plat) PW 10-037 (Public Works Permit) Comprehensive Plan Low Density Residential (LDR) Designation/Zoning District: II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Planning Supervisor has determined that the application for a Tree Clearing Permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance, the applicant shall provide the City with a financial guarantee (cash or assignment of funds) in the amount of $750 (150% of the cost estimate for the trees provided by the applicant). Due to SM Page 1 of 3 C:\Documents and Settings \Brandon-m\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook\I9Q7J1JY\NOD.doc 12/22/2011 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 June 8, 2011 Staff Report and Notice of Decision f,l 1-032: SPEEA Tree Cutting Permit the low dollar cost, a bond will not be accepted. The financial guarantee will be retained by the City for up to three years from initial planting of the trees. In the event that a tree dies and is replaced the three year time period will restart from the date the replaced tree is installed. The City, at its own discretion, may choose release all or a portion the financial guarantee at an earlier date. 2. Trees shall be removed by a licensed, bonded, and insured contractor. 3. The project shall comply with the redlines drawings provided by the City. 4. This approval does not include removal of the 7" birch and 6" cottonwood in the public right of way. No trees shall be removed within the City's right of way without the express, written authorization of the City of Tukwila. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 1 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the City Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the Hearing Examiner appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Planning Supervisor's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by January 6, 2012. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code ch. 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision.. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the information presented to the Planning Supervisor who made the original decision. No new evidence or testimony will be permitted during the appeal hearing. Parties will be allowed to present oral argument based on the information presented to the Planning Supervisor before their decision was issued. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. SM Page 2 of 3 12/22/2011 C:\Documents and Settings \Brandon-m\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files \Cartent.Outlook\I9Q7J1JY\NOD.doc June 8, 2011 Staff Report and Notice of Decision L11-032: SPEEA Tree Cutting Permit Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner's decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Department of Community Development City of Tukwila SM Page 3 of 3 12/22/2011 C:\Documents and Settings\Brandon-m\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\I9Q7J1JY\NOD.doc December 19, 2011 TO: Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor FM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner RE: Approval of Tree Cutting Permit and Buffer Mitigation Plan for Rong Fe Li (L11-048). BACKGROUND Rong Feng Li has an approved two lot short plat approved at 4066 S. 128th Street. After approval of the short plat application, the applicant requested to slightly modify the site layout. The modification of the site plan will require the removal of three significant treesl on a steep slopes. Under TMC 18.52 and 18.54 a tree permit and mitigation is required for any signicant trees removed on a steep slope. TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN The applicant is requesting to remove a total of seven to nine trees. Only those trees that are on a steep slope are subject to the requirements of obtaining a tree a clearing permit. Tree #1, 2 and 3 in the table below are subject to a tree peiiiiit and replacement. Tree # Tree Species Tree Diameter Steep Slope? Reason for Removal 1. Maple 10" Yes Located in footprint of new house. 2. Ornamental 14" Yes Located in footprint of new house 3. Unknown 14" Yes Near footprint of new house. 4. Birch 7" No Located near property line and in backyard of existing house. 5. Birch 8" No Unknown 6. Hemlock 6" No Unknown 7. Cottonwood 26" No Located close to cut for driveway to new house. An attempt will be 1 TMC 18.06.775 defines a "significant tree" [as] a tree (cottonwood excluded) which is 4 inches or more in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade. BM Page 1 of 3 H:\Tree Permit\Rong Feng\Tree Cutting Permit Approval.doc 12/20/2011 10:19:00 AM made to save the tree. Sheet E3 shows the tree protection measures to be used. 8. Cottonwood 36" No Located close to cut for driveway to new house. An attempt will be made to save the tree. Sheet E3 shows the tree protection measures to be used. 9. Cottonwood 28" No Located in the driveway of new house. The removal of cottonwoods is exempt from the need to obtain a tree clearing permit. The plans also indicate that two trees will be removed within the City's adjacent right of way. A review of the approved Public Works Permit for the proposed project indicates that no work will occur in this area. The removal of trees within the City's Right of Way is not approved. There are some trees that will be retained as part of the project. As shown in sheet E3, the applicant has proposed tree protection measures around those trees that are to be retained. TMC 18.54 provides a tree replacement schedule for the removal of significant trees. The number of trees required to be planted is based the diameter of the trees removed. In order to mitigate the removal of a 10" maple, 14" ornamental; and a 14" unknown trees the applicant is required to plant ten trees. The applicant has proposed to plant ten Western Red Cedars along the north and east property lines of each of the new lots. The City's Urban Environmentalist reviewed the plans and has noted the Western Red Cedar requires watering in dry seasons for two to three years in order to get established. The applicant has proposed an irrigation system for watering. One concern with watering is that the applicant is constructing single family homes with each lot being sold off individually once the homes are constructed. In order to ensure that the trees are successful and replaced if damaged, a financial guarantee of $750 (150% of the trees' estimated costs) will be provided to the City. Brandon-M Page 2 12/22/2011 H:\Tree Permit\Rong Feng\Tree Cutting Permit Approval.doc • RECOMMENDATION Approve the L11-048, Tree Cutting permit for 4066 S. 128th Street with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance, the applicant shall provide the City with a financial guarantee (cash or assignment of funds) in the amount of $750 (150% of the cost estimate for the trees provided by the applicant). Due to the low dollar cost, a bond will not be accepted. The financial guarantee will be retained by the City for up to three years from initial planting of the trees. In the event that a tree dies and is replaced the three year time period will restart from the date the replaced tree is installed. The City, at its own discretion, may choose release all or a portion the financial guarantee at an earlier date. 2. Trees shall be removed by a licensed, bonded, and insured contractor. 3. The project shall comply with the redlines drawings provided by the City. 4. This approval does not include removal of the 7" birch and 6" cottonwood in the public right of way. No trees shall be removed within the City's right of way without the express, written authorization of the City of Tukwila. Brandon-M Page 3 12/22/2011 H:\Tree Permit\Rong Feng\Tree Cutting Permit Approval.doc AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC October 13, 2011 Mr. Brandon J. Miles City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Rong Feng Li Short Plat Tree Clearing Permit Revision Comments (APCE Project #2011002) Brandon: CIVIL ENGINEERING I+r""v °=� OCT 172011l Coro uN.T( IZVELQP:u.E, We have reviewed your comments from your letter of the 10"' of October as follows: 1. "Cottonwoods have a poor tolerance for root disturbance. The root protection zone for retained cottonwoods should be increased to 1.25 feet for every inch of the trunk's diameter. It appears that the two cottonwoods retained in the front yard will be significantly impacted by cutting the foundation for the brick wall. Please indicate if the root protection zone of 1.25 feet for every inch of the trunk's diameter can be maintained. If not these trees should be removed and additional mitigation trees should be installed." Because the City's code does not recognize cottonwoods as significant trees, no extra mitigation will be proposed. Since it is uncertain whether the construction will kill the trees, the contractor will be left to determine whether actual construction impacts will require the trees to be removed. 2. "Red Cedars typically need two to three dry seasons of watering in order to establish themselves. Provide details on supplemental watering until establishment of red cedars." Notes on the watering requirements for the trees have been added to sheet E3. 3. "Provide a cost estimate for all trees to be planted on the site." The 10 new Red Cedars are estimated to cost $500 to purchase and $500 to plant. If you have any questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me at (253) 347-0887. Sincerely, AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC Adam E. Paul, PE Principal Civil Engineer AEPaul@APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 347-0887 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Mr. Adam Paul AP Consulting Engineers, PLLC PO Box 162 Auburn, WA 98071 RE: Tree Clearing Permit L11-048 Dear Mr. Paul: The City received your tree clearing permit for the Rong Feng Li Short Plat on September 14, 2011. After a review of the submitted tree clearing permit, the City requires that additional information be submitted: 1. Cottonwoods have a poor tolerance for root disturbance. The root protection zone for retained cottonwoods should be increased to 1.25 feet for every inch of the trunk's diameter. It appears that the two cottonwoods retained in the front yard will be significantly impacted by cutting the foundation for the brick wall. Please indicate if the root protection zone of 1.25 feet for every inch of the trunk's diameter can be maintained. If not these trees should be removed and additional mitigation trees should be installed. 2. Red Cedars typically need two to three dry seasons of watering in order to establish themselves. Provide details on supplemental watering until establishment of the red cedars. 3. Provide a cost estimate for all trees to be planted on the site. We you resubmit, please ensure that all of your construction plans for all your permits match. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431-3684 or send an email to Brandon.Miles@Tukwilawa.gov. Senior Planner cc. File (L 11-048) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development LAND USE PERMIT TO: Building lc Planning Public Works IR Fire Dept. fl Police Dept. ICI Parks/Rec File Number 1< < "2 a ING FORM Project: ,n .• , ' / - Address: GO(/ 9 .2-2 PI 1)- Date transmitted: all 111 l ( Response requested by: 4( 3 it i Staff coordinator: ec 13.P1'rt Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 5(c. c—itc4oust 11 r43 aUd C`cs 5 ew ' 1 `oo J i 'LOP %'�� kfk Q t, , y( v.•n O\ Lo-c-cL\ Plan check dat : Comment 'WNW_ Update date: ‘ kk �� prepared b TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number - LI 1 '0 3 PLII-93bj LAN PERMIT ROUTING FORM -�ydrh Building Planning Public Works ly Fire Dept. 0 Police Dept. n Parks/Rec I .• Project: in '14- 0' Address: U96 5, 12 2 /h // Date transmitted: 1. 11I 1( Response requested by: 41 3 )/ I Staff coordinator: 13 • %i 1Ikk Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Sic `4't4Atk Pvo JVN OLA-0 ci d 1 (A vv eA-e!".. • R-d (-e d C o ` i'�v► LAJ a c )d S` r-i-1 vri s P (1/4-kLP i (A c (-e i /\C Mn I, 4 v/ (C— V 0 0 or, 1,4 ce -%•r ✓ rod d (� 4 �cc% re ,. 41 + -{gyp c b-P (.0 c -e-A.n 9 t^ ('pke-P w , -.e& q k1fi r -e s vb 1, s I'-ed — - 3 Plan check date: 0 --15�— I t Comments prepared by: J GLU�� Update date: ` J City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number 1ll-043 ? LI I --73b) LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building Planning Public Works IR Fire Dept. n Police Dept. I❑I Parks/Rec - Projec ,n 9t11. Vol ,..3 r(r )14 4 0 cA- J Address: (- OG G 5,11-j 111/ 1)- Date transmitted: GI 111 I ( Response requested by: 'fI 3 )// / 1 i Staff coordinator: 13./1 Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 5(c 4-11-4tik a Ge . .k�� Plan check date: l Comments prepared by: Update date: G� City of Tukwila Department of Community Development LAND USE TO: Building IV Planning RECEIVED SEP 1 g 2011 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number IT ROUTING FORM (Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. 10l Parks/Rec Project: ,n r t c (� ' J (I t- Address: GO(' G 5,12-2 Ph 1)- Date transmitted: °l 11' ! ( Response reQ2 uested by: 'L l,(/ 1 I Staff coordinator: k �3.4i Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Sic 44144,, ( me, Cgr►m rr1S — Pt 4 uic Lualck5 Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number LI I '99 PLII-�3� LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building Planning Public Works N7 Fire Dept. I❑I Police Dept. IQ Parks/Rec Project: Y1 .• '14- 0 Address: U9L Za 5, l rh 1)- Date transmitted: 61 11I l ( Response requested by: 413 )/ 1 1 Staff coordinator: 13 • ilk Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Sic 4.-1144-t Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: CITY OF TUKWILFA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter J*)ulevara Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone! (206) 431-3670FAX {206) 431-3665 E-mtrrrl, tukglan4i.1ukwila.wa.uss TREE CLEARING PERMIT Tukwila's Tree Ordinance regulates the clearing of trees and understory• vegetation in or near environmentally sensitive areas and within 200 feet of the Green River. Specific exemptions from the requirement to obtain a Tree Clearing Permit are listed at TMC 18.54.050. 18.54.O50 Permit * Exempt Activities The following activities are exempt from the application of this chapter and do not require a Tree Clearing Permit: 1. Clewing of any vegetation; IUN1.13SS the site on which clearing is to occur is located in a sensitive area, sensitive area buffer, or shoreline zone. 2. On sites within a sensitive area, or sensitive area buffer, or shoreline zone: a. Clearing of up to 4 significant trees on a site currently zoned and developed for single-family residcmtial use within any 36-month period; UNLESS the significant trees to be removed are located within a wetland, watercourse and their associated buffers or within the shoreline zone. b. Clearing of any vegetation located outside a sensitive area, sensitive area buffer or outside the shoreline zone. c. Removal of hazardous {roes. d. Routine maintenance of vegetation necessary to maintain the health of cultivated plants, to contain noxious weeds, or to remedy a potential fire or health hazard or threat to public safety per TMC Commercial parking subject to TMC Chapter 18.56, "Of Street Parking and Loading Regulations.^8.2S, Nuisance.. e. Vegetation removal necessary to the operation of an established Christmas tree farm or conrmei cial plant nursery. f. Construction and 'maintenance of streets and utilities within City -approved rights -of -way and easements. DEFINITIONS: Sensitive areas means wetlands, watercourses, areas of potential geologic instability (other than Class 1 areas), abandoned coal mine areas, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. Shoreline zone means a 200-foot area surrounding any shoreline in Tukwila composed of three zones: (1) aver environment, (2) low -impact environment, and (3) high impact environment. Significant tree Means a tree (Cottonwood excluded) which is 4 inches or more in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade. However, removal of any cottonwood tree that is 12 inches or greater in diameter (as measured 4.5 feet above grade) within the first 100' from the river shall require a tree permit; me 18.44,110, PROCEDURES: At the time you submit your application you must have all of the items listed on the attached "Complete Application Checklist." You may request a waiver from items on the checklist that are not applicable to your project. Please discuss this waiver request with City staffeither at a pre -application meeting or at the time of application submittal. Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff will determine if it is complete based on the attached checklist. If not complete City staffwill mail you a letter outlining what additional information is needed. If you do not submit requested mat iials within 90 days from the City's rque.st foradditianal information the City may cancel your application. Once the application is complete it will be reviewed by the Director who will issue a decision to approve, modify or deny the application based on the review criteria. EXCEPTIONS: Per TMC 18.34.140 the Director of Community Development may grant exceptions from the requirements of the Tree Ordinance when undue hardship may be created by strict compliance with the provisions of the chapter. An application for an exception must be submitted by the property owner to the Department of Community Development and shall accompany the Thee Cleating Permit application. The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Commtmity Development. Please contact each Department if you feet that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to dish consistency with development standards. City Stab' arc available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). * Please note that the application fee listed in the land use fee schedule covers speed number of review hours and is due at the time an application is received by the City. Review hours over the retainer fee will be charged at $92.00 per hour and the applicant will receive a monthly bill when those fees become due Cheek Items saboitted with .. sppliaatiah - information Retjttlivd. • • . . � j, beiraiy:ed in iaiusurrl cases, upon:appl+6miof born Public Wu'rki and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: i 1. Application Checklist one (I) copy, indicating items submitted with application. d 2. Permit Fee: See Land IJ.se Fee Schedule for Stand App. Fee. *Add'1 fees may incur 3. Completed -Application Form and drawings (4 copies). ✓ 4. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy axtached). ✓ 5. One set of all plans reduced to either 8 1t2" by 11" or 11" by 17". / 6. - Written response to the approval criteria at TMC 18.54.130. Kl.1A 7. Written response to the exception criteria at TMC 18.54.140 ifany exceptions are requested. N /� 8. Protessional r view of the replacement plan by a landscape architect, surveyor or certified arboristper TMC 18.54.080 3. 9. Proposed time schedule of vegetation removal, relocation anchor replacement, and other construction activities which may affect crosite vegetation, sensitive areas, sensitive area buffers and/or the shoreline zone. SITE PLAN: 14 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". fib) Existing and proposed building footprints and utilities. (c) Limits of construction. _ (d) Parking lots, driveways and fire access lanes, I (e) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls. (f) Existing and proposed topography at 2-foot contour intervals. / (g) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes ova 15%, aline zone, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites) and their buffers and setbacks. ✓ species (h) Diameter, species name, location and canopy of existing significant trees. 4/ (i) Identification of ail significant trees to be removed and/or relocated, LANDSCAPE PN,AN. . Check items sabmttted with • • • apylica • • Information Iteclaireit • . , ' • . • . ' •. May bewaived in:ton sutl cases. upon. appravat o 'hr h Public. Works and Planting . i 1 (a) Landscape planting filan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect, surveyor or certified arborist Maximum size 24" x 36". I f (b) Diameter, species name and location of all c sis significant try and vegetation to be retained. - / (c) Diameter. species name, spacing, size and location of replacement troxlvegetation to be used to replace vegetation cleared per TMC 18.54.130 3 b. (d Proposed tree protection measurtis (fbr example fencing at drip line). / (e) Identify measures proposed for mitigation of vegetation in clearing a sensitive area and/or its buffer per the Environmentally Sensitive Areas chapter of the Zoning Code, TMC I 8.45. (t) Any other measures proposed to restore the environmental and aesthetic benefits previously provided by on -site vegetation. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 630o soufhcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplanaki.tuk wi la.wa. us `,s 0 `a�'� L.' Dy 2 s JQ 0 �© TREE r 644, CLEARING PERMIT FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Pius Type.• P-T'REE Planner: File Number: (_ j , _. f3 L Application Complete {Dame: ) Project File Number: L, ( 1-- �'� Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT / DEVELOPMENT: LOCATION OF PROJECTIDEVELOPAFNT: Give stet mess or, if vacant indicate lor(s), block and subdivision access street, and nearest intersection. iLA7 WA 18163 LIST AU TAX LOT NUMBERS (his injormation may he, found on your fax .statement). 7—Sp — 0487 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making En hority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City stab • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards. and • is the primary contact with the City do whom all notices and reports will be seat. Name: 4 Address: `r x -..1 Cz �Q ma- je,A q.8071. Phone: C13) L 7 FAX: E-mail: EPA (4f CMSu1Tisvci qIj EFLIZZ,eglvl Signature_ Dom: CITY OF TUKW LA Depe rofConfutsuffigyDevaf 6300 S'oueaatzenierI osdevarrl Tukwila, WA >8188 Telephone: (206)431-367UIiLY(206) 4313665 E-math inkpisui(riiui.wkwila stsus AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE QFWASiI1NG iON COUNTY OF RING Thu undid being duly swam est upon oath states as follows: 1. 1 am the current owner of thepmperty which is the stitSeetof this application_ 2. All statements confined in the epplic-ems have been prepared by me or my tunas and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3 The application is beats submitted with my lrnowlete andeemsetri 4 Over graves the City. its employ ce, agents, engineers, contractors or other rL. the rig I to enter upon Owner's real property, located a: for the purpose of application review, for the limiicd time necessary y to comp petc that purpose. 5. Owner elm= to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property *mating on the private property during the City's entry upon the 1 wetty, unless the Ions or damage is the rasult of the sole negligence of the City. 6 Non -responsiveness to a City indbrmtaiun request for ninety (9 or mare days, shall he cause to cancel the application(s) witlmtd reltadd of fees Sti warm at (cite). (stare), on ,20 Print Name Address PhoneNwnber Signature On this day pecaematly appeared bciim me to me tttwvm to tic the individual vdu exccuead the towing inalr{mwnt arnt acknowledged that tikes signed the aeenc as haat vmutd;ay but acid eked far the wets and purpones mesitinncd tleerein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF 2O Nt7TARY PUBLIC in aid for the otlliaaldngeon misaga My Commission expires on The applicant bears responsibility tin' demonstrating that the proposal satisfies ail of the permit approval criteria. Planning Division staff are available to discuss the decision criteria you muss respond to and necessary supporting materials. PERMIT APPROVAL CRITERIA To the extent that vegetation retention and/or replacement is consistent with project fusibility or reasonable use of the property, vegetation clearing shall be planned and conducted to meet all of the criteria below. These criteria shall be the basis for approval, approval with conditions or denial of any tree clearing included in a Tree Clearing Permit application. 1. Tree Retention - Site improvements shall be designed and constructed to retain as many existing healthy trees as possible, and to meet the following criteria: a. Priority shall be given to retention of existing stands of trees, trees at site perimeter, trees within the shoreline Low -Impact Environment, in Sensitive Areas or Sensitive Area Buffers, and healthy mature trees. b. All understory vegetation within the essential root zone of protected trees shall be: (1) retained; OR (2) removed by methods which are non -damaging to the tree, and replaced with vegetation with horticultural requirements which are compatible with protected trees. c. Vegetation removal shall be undertaken in such a manner as to preserve, to the degree possible, the aesthetic and ecological benefits provided by such vegetation. 2. Tree Protection Measures - a. The proposal shall include tree protection measures which meet or exceed best management practices and current standards of professional arboriculture, and which are sufficient to ensure the viability of protected trees and other vegetation identified for retention pursuant to requirements of this chapter, and shall include measures sufficient to protect any Sensitive Area, its Huffier and vegetation within the shoreline Low Impact Environment. b. During clearing and/or construction activities, all protected vegetation shall be surrounded by protective fencing which prevents adverse impacts associated with clearing from intruding into areas of protected vegetation. 3. Tree Replacement - The site shall be planted with trees to meet the following minimum requirements: a. Each existing significant tree removed shall be replaced with new tree(s), based ott the size of the existing tree as shown below, up to a maximum density of 70 new trees per acre. b. Tree Replacement Ratios Diameter of Existing No. of Replacement Tree Removed Trees Required 4 8 inches X 8 - 12 inches 2 12 - 18 inches 4 18 - 24 inches 6 >24 inches 8 c. Prior to any vegetation removal; the applicant shall demonstrate through a Landscape Plan, Sensitive Area Mitigation Plan or other materials required per the requirements of this chapter that vegetation replacement will meet the following minimum standards: (1) Minimum sizes shall be 2.5-inch caliper for deciduous trees, 6 to 8 feet in height for evergreen trees, 24 inches in height for shrubs, and 1 gallon for groundcover, (2) Replacement plants shall meet current American Association of Nurserymen standards for nursery stock; . (3) Planting and maintenance of required replacement vegetation shall be in accordance with best management practices for landscaping which ensure the vegetation's tong -term health and survival. 4. Surrounding Environment - The timing of, and methods to be used in any proposed vegetation removal shall be such that impacts to protected vegetation, wildlife, fisheries and the surrounding environment are ;minimized. 5. Tree Relocation - Tree relocation shall be carried out according to best management practices, and trees proposed for relocation shall have a reasonable chance of survival, TREE REGULATION DEVIATIONS ❑ The Director may grant exceptions from the requirements of chapter 18.54 when undue hardship may be created by strict compliance with the provisions of this chapter. Any authorization for exception tion may prescribe conditions deemed. necessary or desirable for the public interest or necessary to meet the intent of this chapter. An exception to this chapter shall not be granted unless all of the following criteria are met: 1. Strict compliance with the provisions of this code may jeopardize project feasibility or reasonable use of property. 2. Proposed vegetation removal, replacement, and any mitigation measures proposed, are consistent with the purpose and intent given in this chapter. 3. The granting of the exception or standard reduction will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity. In addition to the above criteria, the Director may also consider any of the following in reviewing an exception request: a. Whether the recommendation of a certified arborist supports the exception. b. Evidence that the size of the site or project cannot support the number of required replacement trees, and off site tree planting is proposed which furthers the goals of this chapter and other City policies. c. On -sit planting ofell required replacement trees is not feasible, and the project includes an equivalent contribution in funds and/or labor and materials for off -site tree planting as jointly agreed by the applicant and Director. cl. Smaller -sized replacement plants are more suited to the species, site conditions, and to the purposes of this chapter, and are planted in sufficient quantities to meet the intent of this chapter. 0 Retention and Replacement of Canopy Cover - on undeveloped sites or sites with dense stands of trees, where the cost of identification of individual tree species and sizes is inordinate relative to the project, the Director may allow the applicant to use the tree canopy cover approach outlined below to calculate retention and replacement of trees: I. The site shall have a min itnum canopy cover equal to 20% of the site area, or equal to the existing canopy cover whichever is less. 2. To meet the requirements for site canopy cover, canopy cover may consist of any combination of existing trees and replacement trees. Canopy cover ofeach new tree shall be calculated at 314 square feet. CITY OF TUKWLA 6300 gosillsewnler:Boulevard &Intila, WA 9818E Telephone • t2Th9 431: 3&7(lIAl C{206) 4313663 Fr nrui: tukplani# ui:tukwila;us_eu 417.57) vlso AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS -ESs SEA PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY Oa° STATE WASMNGTON COUNTY OFYJNG ss Iltc undtasigns d being duly swam and upon oath stares as 6o1k,ws: 1. I am the current owner oftheproperty which is the stilled of this application_ 2. Ali statements coals ned in Ibe s ppiicions have been p.epsredby me Or my tars and are true and coma logic best of my knowledge. 3 The application is being submittal within), Immolate wadi:casing. 4. Omer grants the City. its employees:ages ds, engineers, eotttaetore or °this nmoser4atit+eg the right to enter upon Owner's teal pmpeaty, Imamatet(� fir !memorythe pnrprseofappticationreview, for the limirodtime tocomp ietethttpulp , S. Own afire s to bold the City harmless for any loss of damage to personsor property coasting an tha private property during the City's eefi upon the Toyota); wtiass the loss or damage is the result of the solo nreipf+nn. of the City. 6 Non-tcspaasitieness to a City inibnnettitut request far ninety (90) or mist days, shall be cause m cancel the application(s) vrithout refund of fete. EXECUTED at _(city), N. (state), ea .. ft SST 1'f 20 1 I 430L I r15 .k unfit Print Name Address Phone,rimnber Sieneawz o)a On this day Personally appeared Woo are friErC, VilA[Q'!ne Lamm to be the individual who exaand the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that fled. signed the volontay out and deed for She roses and perposestocraioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND S>i3i$ (1O BEFORE MB OW THIS 1 �- DAY OF S1� ~ r • 21.1. r 11 �, \� w o ��A M Y R` ; NOTARY UC inarnd ate Sisk of VGa nington PuB\-• • A. `� OWP`'�rri1n F My CommlSsi expiresS —1— >I `1 AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC CIVIL ENGINEERING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION .QFFPROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEP 14 20111 CLIENT: Rong Feng Li 18432 172nd Court SE Renton, WA 98058 Gomm:Pt' DEVELOP4a,E1T Date: September 13, 2011 PROJECT NAMEILOCATION: Rong Feng Li Short Plat Tree Clearing Permit 4066 South 128th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Preparation of tree clearing permit application materials. SCOPE OF SERVICES: See proposal letter dated September 13, 2011 ENGINEERING CHARGES: Fee not to exceed $120 without prior written authorization per the terms and conditions of this agreement, to be paid prior to release of engineering documents by AP Consulting Engineers PLLC. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: AP Consulting Engineers PLLC is to be held harmless for any work or design parameters provide by Rang Feng Li or other design consultants hired by Rang Feng Li. The Terms and Conditions on the reverse side of this form are a part of this agreement. Offered By: AP Consulting Engineers PLLC Adam E. Paul, PE Principal Civil Engineer Accepted By: (Signature) AEPaul@APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 347-0887 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071 AP CONSULTING F,NGINEERS PLLC September 13, 2011 Rong Feng Li 18432 172"vi Court SE Renton, WA 98058 Spp 14 20111 CIVIL ENGINEERING RE: Rong Eeng Li Short Plat Tree Clearing Permit Proposal for 4068 South 128th Street, Tukwila, WA 98168 Dear Rong Feng Li: I propose to complete the documents for the Tree Clearing Permit that are necessary to complete the package that will be resubmitted to the City of Tukwila. As 1 understand this portion of the project, it will only require the preparation of a document to describe how the current construction documents adequately comply with the City's tree clearing permit requirements. AP Consulting Engineers (APCE) proposes the following fee not to exceed budget without prior written authorization per the attached terms and conditions: DESIGN SERVICES Tree Clearing Permit Letter $ 120 This proposal assumes that APCE will be provided with copies of documents and drawings that have been prepared by other consultants and are, in APCE's estimation, necessary to complete this work. Additionally, all incidental costs, such as copying or mileage costs, incurred by APCE will be your responsibility and will be billed at a rate of the actual cost to APCE plus ten percent. The following items are not included in APCE's scope -of -work, but I would be happy to assist you in finding a consultant that will be able to provide these services, where they are outside of the services that APCE can provide and where they are necessary for your project: • Design changes to proposed short plat • Major changes by owner, contractor, or county • Plan check and permit fees • Plan check revisions not due to omissions by APCE If you have any questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me at (253) 347-0887. Please sign both copies of the Agreement for the Provision of Professional Services and return one original copy to APCE. Sincerely, AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC Adam E. Paul, PE Principal Civil Engineer AEPaut APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 347-0887 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071. TERMS AND CONDITIONS AP Consulting Engineers PLLC (hereafter shown as APCE) shall perform the services outlined in this agreement and will act as the owner' s agent. ACCESS TO SITE: Unless otherwise stated, APCE will have access to the site for activities necessary for the performance of the services. APCE will take precautions to minimize damage due to these activities, but has nothing included in the fee for the cost of restoration of any resulting damage. FEE: The total fee, if stated, shall be understood to be an estimate, and shall not be exceeded by more than ten percent without advanced notification to the Client. Where the fee arrangement is to be on an hourly basis, the rates shall be those prevailing at the time the services are rendered. Current hourly rates are as follows: Project Engineer Expert Witness $120.00/hr. $250.00/hr. AutoCAD Operator $75.00/hr. BILLING/PAYMENTS: Invoices for APCE services shall be submitted at APCE's option, either upon completion of such services or on a monthly basis. invoices shall be payable within thirty (30) days after the invoice date. If the invoice is not paid within (30) days, APCE may, without waiving any claim or right against the Client, and without liability whatsoever to the Client, terminate the performance of the service. Retainers shall be credited on the final invoice. Inquiries and questions concerning any invoice shall be made in writing within (10) days of receipt. Failure to notify APCE within this period shall constitute a waiver to any claim with respect to the content or accuracy of the invoice, as well as the acceptance of services provided. LATE PAYMENTS: Unpaid accounts may be subject to a monthly service charge of 1.5% on the then unpaid balance (18% true annual rate) at the sole election of APCE, In the event any portion or all of an account remains unpaid sixty (60) days after billing, the Client shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attomey's fees. The work contemplated herein shall, when performed, constitute an improvement to real property, and the entire parcel of real property may be subjected to a labor or materialmen's lien in the event of non- payment pursuant to RCW Chapter 60.04. Client acknowledges by his signature on this contract that he understands and has been notified that a lien may be claimed for work done or materials furnished hereunder, and hereby waives further notice. INDEMNIFICATION: The Client shall indemnify and hold harmless APCE and all of its personnel from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) arising out of or resulting from the performance of the services, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by the negligent acts or omissions and or liability of the Client, anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Client (except APCE), or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. MERIT OF CLAIM: Prior to any direct or third party claims against APCE, the Client shall first provide a written certification, executed by a structural or civil engineer licensed in the project jurisdiction, specifying each and every act or violation of the standard of care. Such certification should be provided at least thirty (30) days prior to the presentation of any such claim. RISK ALLOCATION: In recognition of the relative risks, rewards and benefits of the project to both the Client and APCE, the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, APCE's total liability to the Client for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses, damages or claim expenses arising out of this agreement from any cause or causes, shall not exceed our fee or $50,000.00 whichever is less. Such causes include, but are not limited to APCE's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or breach of warranty. TERMINATION OF SERVICES: The agreement may be terminated by the Client or APCE should the other fail to perform its obligations hereunder. In the event of termination, the Client shall pay APCE for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses, and reimbursable termination expenses. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: The cost for all normalout-of-pocket travel expenses, phone charges, blueprints expenses, courier charges, etc., shall be billed as a multiple of 1.10 times the cost incurred by APCE. All consultants hired by APCE will be done as the owner' s agent. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Evaluations of existing sites and buildings require that certain assumptions be made regarding the existing conditions. These assumptions cannot be verified without substantial cost or demolition. The Client understands that actual field conditions may subsequently be found to vary from design assumptions which in turn may alter or increase the scope of the design and /or construction. Where investigation is not authorized, APCE shall not be responsible for the unknown condition of the existing sites or structure. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All documents produced by APCE under this agreement shall remain the property of APCE and may not be used by the Client for any other endeavor without the written consent of APCE. APPLICABLE LAW: This agreement shall be governed by the laws of King County of the State of Washington. AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC CIVIL ENGINEERING September 14, 2011 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Rong Feng Li Short Plat Tree Clearing Permit Approval Criteria (APCE Project #2011002) To Whom It May Concern: In order to construct a new residence on the westem portion of the Rong Feng Li property at 4066 South 128th Street, it will be necessary to remove three significant trees. In addition to completing a tree clearing permit application, the following approval criteria from section 18.54.130 of the Tukwila Municipal Code have been met as follows: 1. Tree Retention - Site improvements shall be designed and constructed to retain as many existing healthy trees as possible, and to meet the following criteria: a. Priority shall be given to retention of existing stands of trees, trees at site perimeter, trees within the shoreline Low -Impact Environment, in Sensitive Areas or Sensitive Area Buffers, and healthy mature trees. No perimeter trees or stands of trees were removed and none of the trees were removed from a shoreline Low -Impact Environment. Three trees were removed from a sensitive area where they would interfere directly with the construction of new improvements. b. All understory vegetation within the essential root zone of protected trees shall be: (1) retained; OR (2) removed by methods which are nondamaging to the tree, and replaced with vegetation with horticultural requirements which are compatible with protected trees. All understory vegetation directly under the canopy of the trees will be protected during construction by clearly marking the areas that are not to be disturbed . c. Vegetation removal shall be undertaken in such a manner as to preserve, to the degree possible, the aesthetic and ecological benefits provided by such vegetation. Vegetation removal will only occur where it is necessary in order to construct the new residence and the improvements necessary to serve the new residence as approved by the City of Tukwila. The site will be stabilized and vegetation will be replaced per City of Tukwila requirements. 2. Tree Protection Measures - a. The proposal shall include tree protection measures which meet or exceed best management practices and current standards of professional arboriculture, and which are sufficient to ensure the viability of protected trees and other vegetation identified for retention pursuant to requirements of this chapter, and shall include measures sufficient to protect any Sensitive Area, its Buffer and vegetation within the shoreline Low -Impact Environment. AEPaul@APConsultingEngineers.com (253) 347-0887 PO Box 162, Auburn, WA 98071 A detail has been included on sheet C3 to require the contractor to provide a temporary fence surrounding any trees that are to remain. Additionally, the site will be protected with, at a minimum, silt fencing in order to protect off -site properties from erosion of sediment from the steeper areas on site. The contractor will be responsible for additional measures, where necessary, as construction advances. b. During clearing and/or construction activities, all protected vegetation shall be surrounded by protective fencing which prevents adverse impacts associated with clearing from intruding into areas of protected vegetation. A detail has been provided on sheet C3 to indicate that this is a requirement of this project. 3. Tree Replacement - The site shall be planted with trees to meet the following minimum requirements: a. Each existing significant tree removed shall be replaced with new tree(s), based on the size of the existing tree as shown below, up to a maximum density of 70 new trees per acre. b. Tree Replacement Ratios Diameter of Existing Tree Removed No. of Replacement Trees Required 4 - 8 inches 1 8 - 12 inches 2 12 - 18 inches 4 18 - 24 inches 6 >24 inches 8 In order to mitigate for removing a 10" maple, a 14" ornamental, and another 14" significant tree, 10 replacement Western Red Cedars will be planted as replacements. c. Prior to any vegetation removal, the applicant shall demonstrate through a Landscape Plan, Sensitive Area Mitigation Plan or other materials required per the requirements of this chapter that vegetation replacement will meet the following minimum standards: (1) Minimum sizes shall be 2.5-inch caliper for deciduous trees, 6 to 8 feet in height for evergreen trees, 24 inches in height for shrubs, and 1 gallon for groundcover. (2) Replacement plants shall meet current American Association of Nurserymen standards for nursery stock; (3) Planting and maintenance of required replacement vegetation shall be in accordance with best management practices for landscaping which ensure the vegetation's long-term health and survival. The plans indicate that the new evergreen trees are to be 6-8 feet tall at the time they are planted. 4. Surrounding Environment - The timing of, and methods to be used in any proposed vegetation removal shall be such that impacts to protected vegetation, wildlife, fisheries and the surrounding environment are minimized. TITLE 18 — ZONING Produced by the City of Tukwila, City Clerk's Office Page 18-135 An erosion and sedimentation control plan has been prepared to ensure that the impacts to the surrounding environment are minimized in accordance with City of Tukwila requirements. 5. Tree Relocation - Tree relocation shall be carried out according to best management practices, and trees proposed for relocation shall have a reasonable chance of survival. No tree relocation is proposed. If you have any questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me at (253) 347-0887. Sincerely, AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLLC Adam E. Paul, PE Principal Civil Engineer W N S GRAPHIC SCALE E 1"=20' 20 ABBREPIArroNS etc CB CL co D DOLL 01 ADS tl. ESMT FD FDC FF FLY FL IF Apt I1I MF DIMD PL RAY SO FT 70 iP U.N.O. MV SW NE TOR 0 20 BUILDING CORNER COMPACT CATCH BASIN CLASS CLEAN OUT STORM ORUN DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE OUCWLE IRON DOWNSPOUT DRNEWAr ELEVATION EASEMENT F'UNMRON DRNN FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION MOH FLOOR FIRE HYDRANT FIANCE JOINT HANDICAP INVERT ELEVATION LINEAR FEET LANDSCAPING MANHOLE MECHANICAL JOIM OVERHEAD PROPERTY UNE RADIUS RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER SQUARE FEET SIDEWALK TOP OF CURB TEST PR UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SOUTH WEST EAST NORTH NORTHWEST SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST SOUTHEAST TO BE REMOVED PROPOSAL FOR: RONG-FENG LI SITE ADDRESS: 4066 S. 128TH ST. TUKWILA, WA MAIL ADDRESS: 18432 172N0 CT SE RENTON, WA 98058 PHONE: (425) 652-6987 NOTE: PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT ONE -CALL (1-800-424-5555) FOR ()MUTT LOCATIONS CONSTRUCTION 1. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE PER APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. THE PERMITTEE IS REWIRED TO MANTMN A SET OF APPROVED PUNS SPECIFICATIONS, AND ASSOCIATED PERMITS ON THE JOB SITE W090 SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE MN ALL FEDERAL, STALE, AND LOCAL LAWS. PERMITTEE SHALL APPLY FOR A REVISDN FOR ANY WORK NOT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PUNS 2 PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE A PRECONSIRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITYS INSPECTOR(S) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY YIORK. 3. WOOL IN ROADWAYS A. ALL WORK IN ROADWAYS SHALL MEET TLIC 11 AND THE FOLLOWING: B. PRIOR TO ANY ACRWTY IN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE THE 0TY A TRAFFIC CONTROL PUN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION, ADDRESS AND DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW DURING THE WORN AND SHALL MEET MUTCD REQUIREMENTS. C. ALL WORN REQUIRING LANE CLOSURES MUST BE BY PERMIT ONLY. FROM THE THIRD THURSDAY IN NOVEMBER TO THE FOLLOWING JANUARY 00, 1HE DIRECTOR DOES NOT ALLOW LANE CLOSURES IN THE TUKWILA URBAN COMER. 0. FIRE, PEDESTRIAN, AND VEHICULAR ACCESS TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIES, EXCEPT WHEN PERMITTEE HAS PERMISSION FROM THE BUILDING OMER AND THE DIRECTOR TO CLOSE AN ACCESS, E ALL ROADWAYS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF DIRT AND DEBRIS USING SIKLLT SWEURKA USE OF WATER 1RU0(S FOR CLEANING ROADWAYS REQUIRES PREAPPROVAL FROM 114E DIRECTOR. F. INSTALL STEEL PLATES OVER ANY TRENCH, AT ANY TIME WORK IS STOPPED AND THE TRENCH IS LEFT OPEN. SLEET 'NOEL COVER SHEET & SITE PLAN 0R090N CONTROL PLAN SHEET N0. TRADING AND TREE RETENTION PLAN 3 CIR. CNANNEL.22.39' 1V ASPHALT EDGE V'ZZ'S 1, 4E if N. OP B01/A9MPJ' c t E. (FLOWS E.) GRAVEL 36Etsr (Glcb) ASPHALT EDGE 1 ALOOF GENERAL NOTES 1. LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR DOSING URURES ARE APPROXIMATE. 2. AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARING PROJECT STE WORK, NOTIFY THE URURES INSPECTOR AT 208-433-0179. 3. REQUEST A PUBLIC WORKS UTILITY INSPECTION AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CAWNG 206-433-0179. 4. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES SOLE RESPONSBIU7Y FOR WORKER SAFETY, AND DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. RIM _.-7 .88 C 789. 4 5 E. I.E..70.00 EW 2' ILK ASPHALT 0/14 PER DI 1/E1 oLLeD'CURB --- ASPHALT SODS CONDITIONS, THE APPROVED PLANS, AND A CURRENT COPY OF CRY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AVAILABLE AT THE JOB STE. 6. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THESE APPROVED DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS REWIRE PRE -APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER, AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA 7. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET CITY OF IUKWILA DEVELOPMENT CUIDEUNES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CURRENT SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS ON-STE. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DRANIN05 PRIOR TO PROJECT ANAL APPROVAL. 10. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL AND STREET MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION. 11. ALL SURVEYING FOR PUBLIC FACILI11ES SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A WASHINGTON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR. VERTICAL DATUM SHALL BE NAVD 1988. HORIZONTAL DATUM SHALL BE WASHINGTON STATE (GRID) COORDINATES NORTH ZONE,U5ING NAD B3/91 SURVEY CONTROL AND TIED TO ANY TWO 01Y OF IUKWILA HORIZONTAL CONTROL MONUMENTS. FOR PROJECTS WITHIN A FLOOD CONTROL ZONE, THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE CONVERSION CALCULATIONS TO NGVD 1929. 12. REPLACE OR RELOCATE ALL SIGNS DAMAGED 0R REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. 13. RETAIN, REPLACE OR RESTORE RISING VEGETATION IN RIGHTS-0E-WAY, EASEMENTS, AND ACCESS TRACTS. 12 R 01 1' MIN , cry COVER SHEET LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N. W. 1/4, OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M„ KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 5893904 Ezra REMOVE ROLL BA D1L 1/E1 INCHES MAmN7\R VFO FRB ALDER N 2' THK SPHALT� D PER D 1/E1 ASPH PER PRI+i AND REP VE CUSS SITE PLAN 1"-20' PROOF CARES IN W/2 HMA o WISE COMPACTION PROCFOURF 1. PROOF -ROLL THE DOSING SUBGRADE TO VERIFY A MINIMUM CBR OF 10. 2. ANY SOFT SPOTS ENCOUNTERED SHELL BE OVER -EXCAVATED AT LEAST 12 INCHES. FILL THE DICAVATION WITH BASE COURSE GRAVEL (LESS THAN 5% FINES). COMPACT THE FILL TO 95% MINIMUM. 3. PROOF -ROLL ANY FILLED SOFT SPOTS TO VERIFY A MINIMUM CBR OF 10. SLOPE PER PLANS 2' HMA CL 1/2' 6' CRUSHED ROCK BASE TO BE COMPACTED TO 95K PROCTOR PREPARE EXG SUBGRADE PER THE BASE COMPACTION PROCEDURES TYP DRIVEWAY SECTION NTS L07' 2 SQ. ' T. IT .1 W. I.E.. 9.• 12' ADS E. I.E.. 48.95 CHI •AIL CnNC. C"LU 6" JUMP R 8" CH 3 6' EMLOCN ROLLLE 3999Y4 I.E.. AD PIPE LEGEND: D3SCRIPTION STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATER AC PAVING CONC. SIDEWALK SPOT ELEVATIONS CONTOURS STORM CAICHBASIN S NDARY SEWER MANHOLE WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT MUTT POLE DECIDUOUS TREE PRO am TREE WATER METER GUY ANCHOR GAS VALVE WATER SPIGOT SEWER STUB CULVERT F7771 so • SS /7 RIM EL-CI.97 CONC. F 5. CTR. CI,INNEL•25.07 (AC1W1 LOCATION NOI.4429'W 274.83' OF 55MH /2) .40. W. I.E." 1T' D/ E. I.E..38.74 1.2. ADS S. I.E.38.74 CB RIM L..4 . 6 12 DI . I. 9.11 .4 .04 8' PVC W. & 18' CONC. N., S. CM. CWWNEL.33.30 47 RM .42 /2' ADS. W. I.E.•38.31 12' ADS 5. I.E.38.35 E- ® 4 SA7S17NC EX_ STORM _EX-WG7E81 �AE 50 s, '9 m cc 8 S 126th ST S 128th ST 00 S 126th ST S 130 128th ST 5130tS S131at ST 40 VICINITY MAP NTS BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF 5. 130111 ST., BONG NORTH 8652'55" EAST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 46, PVERSDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PUTS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST UNE OF SAID TRACT 46, 424.4 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WEST UNE, 200 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE CONTINUING EAST ALONG SAID UNE 143.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST UNE OF SAD TRACT 46; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST UNE, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT TO AN INTERSECTION N1111 A UNE PARALLEL WW1 AND 200 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE WESTERLY UNE OF SAID TRACT 46; THRICE NORTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL UNE, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, FOSTER INTERCHANGE TO SOUTH 118111 STREET, UNDER KING COUNTY, SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 647372. VERTICAL DATUM: NORTH M ERICAN VERTICAL DATUM O' 1988 BENCHMARK: W.S.D.O.T. MONUMENT ID NUMBER 6423 1 3/4' BRASS DISK STAMPED "LS. NO. 17199' IN CONCRETE IN CASE AT BACK OF CONCRETE SDEWAIN W. OF S.W. CORNER OF ECONO LODGE HOTEL ON E. SIDE OF S.R. 99 ELEV. = 268.26 U.S. FEET SITE BENCHMARK Np1: EASTERLY MOST NORTHERN BOLT ON UPPER FLANG OF FIRE HYDRANT IN S.E. QUAD OF THE INTERSECTION OF S. 128111 ST. & MACADAM RD S EL = 43.82 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2.00 U.S FEET. CONTOURS BASED ON ACTUAL FED SURVEY. NOTES: 1. MONUMENTS LAST VISITED 03-26-0d 2 THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED YAIHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT R1LE REPORT MID THEREFORE DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY. REFERENCE SURVEYS: R1: R05 BK. 208, PG. 100 R2 R0S BK. 12, PG. 167 R3: R0S BK. 75, PG. 149 R4: ROS BK. 84, PG. 207 SEP 1 2011' ci z U T/) w z z a SURVEYORS N w w z (,0 z w z= 00 DRAINAGE PLAN 4 WATERAND SEWER PLAN FII F-\\PPI TAT\FNf.INTFRINr.\7111`R\2Mi1-fl\fi\FNOINFFRINo\700R-I1.ifiFl 1100 I Pi0T RATE. R/31 /0011 PIN- Al AM 1 I AST kIMIFIF0 RATE A„n 12 70(1 11•1 ,1-1F 16 %Ia 20 N S GRAPHIC SCALE .28 lAl N. OR BOUNDARY COR GRAVEL 20 LS WDE VAL. CB RIM •%-71.88 12 W. 1.2,69.94 12' +• E. 1.E.-70.00 1 "=20'. 38eOr c4Lcb) RUGGED CURB �TPh4LT EOCE CB RIM E -72.01 12 01 I.E-70.00 PROPOSAL FOR: RONG-FENG U SITE ADDRESS: 4066 S. 128TH ST. TUKWILA, WA MAIL ADDRESS: 18432 172ND CT SE RENTON, WA 98058 PHONE: (425) 652-6987 CB RIM EL-5 .08 12 DI W. .E-49.05 12' ADS E. LE- 48.95 GRADING AND TREE RETENTION PLAN LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N.W. 1/4, OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON .9 GRADING AND TREE RETENTION PLAN 1"=20' 32 11.4 3 - 2.79 12' 0< E 1.E-38.74 012' ADS 5. I.E.-38.74 RI L- 6 12 W. LE-39.I1 o • CRIM ;-f.7 12 12 C. . 1. 3 12' ADS W. I.E..31 3835 12' ADS S. I.E-J8.15 0- F GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) MEASURES ON THE APPROVED PLANS ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. 2. BEFORE BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ESTABUSH THE CLEARING UNITS, INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AND INSTALL ER0510N PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES 3. BEFORE ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS, ALL D0W6HEA11 EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (ESC) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL ESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE ESC PLAN. 4. ESC MEASURES, INCLUDING ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS, SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL SITE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND PERMANENT STA8IIJZATIOU IS ESTABLISHED. S FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT *ILL REMAIN UNWORKED FOR SEVEN DAYS OR MORE 6. FROM 0CTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30, PROVIDE 1611PORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT WALL REMAIN UNBORKED FOR TWO DAYS 0R MORE. IN MORON 10 COVER MEASURES, NE CONTRACTOR SHALL: A PROTECT STOCKPILES AND STEEP CUT AND FILL SLOPES IF UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 12 HOURS B. STOCKPILE, ON SITE, ENOUGH COVER MATERIALS TO COVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS C. BY 0CTOBER 8, SEED ALL AREAS THAT WTI REMAIN UNWORKED DURING THE WET SEASON (OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30). MULCH ALL SEEDED AREAS 7. FAILURE TO MNNTNN ESC MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE APPROVED LUMINANCE SCHEDULE MAY RESULT IN HE WORK BEING PERFORMED AT HE DIRECTION OF THE DIRECTOR AND ASSESSED AS A LIEN AGAINST HE PROPERTY WHERE SUCH FACILITIES ARE LOCATED. S WRING THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT, HE PERMITTEE SHALL MAINTAIN IN GOOD Cp10IT10N AND PROMPTLY REPAIR RESTORE, OR REPLACE ALL GRADE SURFACES; WALLS DRAINS, DAMS STRUCTURES VEGETATION, FR05LON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, AND OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS tTREE PROTECTION PER DETAIL 1/3 TREES TO REMAIN TREES 1O BE REMOVED 9. THE PERMITTEE SHALL MONITOR THE DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE FEATURES, AND SHAD, WIN THE DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL, REMOVE AU. SEDIMENT DEPOSITION RESULTING FROM PROJECT RELATED WORK. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE PER APPROVD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. THE PERMITIEE IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ASSODATED PERMITS ON THE JOB SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE W1H ALL FEDERAL, STATE. AND LOCAL LAWS. 11. AS THE FIRST ORDER OF B051965, THE PERMIIIEE SHALL INSTALL ER0510N PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PER THE ESC AND SHALL INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES BEFORE ANY SIZE DISTURBANCE OCCURS. BEFORE THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE REMOVED, INSTALL AND ESTABUSH THE UPSTREAM PERMANENT ESC MEASURES 12. THE PERMITTEE SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROTECT SENSDVE AREAS, THEIR BUFFERS, AND ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR EASEMENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. THE PERMITTEE SHALL RESTORE, TO THE STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT, SENSITIVE AREAS, 1NEIR BUFFERS, AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE PERMITIFCS OPERATIONS. 13. PERMITTEE SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: A NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WHIN 48 HOURS RIMING INSTALLATION OF ESC MEASURES B. OBTAIN PERMISSION IN WILTING FROM HE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO MODIFYING HE ESC PLAN. C. MAINTAIN All ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER FACTURES AS 0FNIIRED N THE ESC PLAN. D. REPAIR ANY SILTATION OR EROSION DAMAGES TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND DRAINAGE FACTURES E. INSPECT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED ESC INSPECTION SCHEDULE AND MAKE NEEDED REPAIRS BWEDIAIELY. SIGNIFICANT TREE PRESERVATION - 70 TREES PER ACRE LOT 115 8459 SO FT, REWIRING 14 TREES PER 18,06.775 SI0NIFCMT TREE A 'SIGNIFICANT TREE' MEANS A TREE (COTTONWOOD E(CLUDED) WHICH 15 4 INCHES 0R MORE IN DIAMETER AS MEASURED 4.5 FEET ABOVE GRADE. SIGNIFICANT TREES REMOVED: 3 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED: 10 DIAMETER OF COSTING TREE REMOVED NO. OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED 4-5 INCHES 1 8-12 INCHES 2 12-18 INCHES 4 18-24 INCHES 6 >24 INCHES 8 1' DIAMETER FOR EVERY 1" CALIPER OF TREE DTL 1/3, TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NTS TREE PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION 1. 4 or 6 FEET HIGH TEMPORARY CHAIN UNK FENCE OR HIGH 08BIUIY PLASTIC WEB FENCING SHALL BE PLACED AROUND CRITICAL ROOT AREA OF TREES TO BE SAVED THAT ARE ADJACENT TO DEVELOPMENT. CRITICAL ROOT AREA SHALL BE EQUAL TO 1' DIAMETER FOR EVERY 1" CALIPER OF EASING TREE. FOR CLUSTERS OF TREES FENCE TO MAKE CONTINUOUS UNE INSTALL CHAIN UNK FENCE POSTS USING PIER BLOCKS ONLY. AVOID DRIVING POSTS OR STRIKES INTO MAJOR ROOTS TREE PROTECTION AREA' SCRS SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL SUES OF FENCED AREAS D0 NOT EOM PROTECTION MEASURES TO OFF STE PROPERTIES. 2. TREATMENT OF ROOTS 6T(POSFD WRING CONSTRUCTION: FOR ROOTS OVER 1' IN DIAMETER DAMAGED WRING CONSTRUCEON, MAKE A CLEAN, STRAIGHT CUT TO REMOVE DAMAGED PORTION OF ROOT. AU. EINOSED ROOTS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY COVERED W/OAMP BURLAP TO PREVENT DRYING, AND COVERED WITH SOIL AS SOON AS POS0BIE 3. WORK WITHIN PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE DONE MANUALLY. N0 STOCKPIUNG OF MATERIALS at STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR MACHINERY SHALL BE ALLOWED WHIN HE LIMIT OF THE FENCING. T`''� SEP 14 20111 DOMMUNITI DEVELOPMENT 3 0 z 4 99 Oi [U; 1--1 T/) W Z Z 3- a E O dN 4411 N,yy 4, • II F\\fFl TAI\FNr.INF f,\7nn9\7MR-nlfi\FN(.INFFRINf.\200R-f1fiF1 nor, I PI OI PATE /31/7011 I 0.1R.3R AM I I AST (TIFIFn PAT- Alin 31 9011 10.04.44 A 1' S AZT PUP Z. at N. OP p0U1194R1" GE17R. ED NEI NM MN SS- SSW 1 . CW.I.. 12 IS E. LE.-70.00 -7 .0/ 12 • E. I.E.-7..00 GRAT 'SCALE 1"=20' 20 0 20 PROPOSAL FOR: RONG-FENG LI SITE ADDRESS: 4066 S. 128111 ST. TUKWILA, WA MAIL ADDRESS: 18432 172ND CT SE RENTON, WA 98058 PHONE: (425) 652-6987 /10 S8919.247/ra ALDER LOT f 8, 59.t ' Q.FT. BJ077rD BYN DB STORM DRAINAGE NOTES 1. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET OTY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT CUIDEIJNES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THE CURRENT KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESGN MANUAL UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. 2. MARK ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MTH "DUMP NO WASTE' AND EITHER 'DRAINS TO STREAMS', 'DRAINS ID WETLANDS', OR "DRAINS TO GROUNDWATER', AS APPUCABLE. 3. COORDINATE FINAL STUB -OUT LOCATIONS WITH THE UTILITIES INSPECTOR. PROVIDE A WIRE OR OTHER DETECTION DEVICE AND MARK SNB-OUT LOCATION WITH A 5-FOOT 2 04' STAKE, BURIED 4-FEET AND LABELED 'STORM' OR TRAIN'. 7 5 GT, LOT 2 t SQ. 6' JUNIP'R 6' BBll H 0 6' REMLOCK ID" ADS E. /.E- 48.99 DRAINAGE PLAN 1" =20' DRAINAGE PLAN LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N. W. 1/4, OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ABBREVIATIONS BLC CB CL CO DOCV D! DS D/W EL ESMT FD FOC FF FHY Fi H/C ELF L/S MH MJ OVHD PL S SOFT STCY IP U.N.0. S NW SW NE SE TBR . 12' DI E. I.E.-55.74 012' ADS S. 1.E-38.74 8 ♦ I.E.r 12' ADS. W. LE-38.31 12" ADS S. I.E.-38.35 F BUILDING CORNER COMPACT CATCH BASIN CLASS CLEAN OUT STORM DRAIN DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE DUCTILE IRON DOWNSPOUT DRIVEWAY ELEVATION EASEMENT FOUNDATION DRAIN FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION FINISH FLOOR FIRE HYDRANT FLANGE Jana 1MNDICAP INVENT ELF/AWN LINEAR FEET LANDSCAPING MANHOLE MECHANICAL JOINT OVERHEAD PROPERTY LINE RADIUS RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER SQUARE FEET SIDEWALK TOP OF CURB TEST PIT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SOUTH WEST EAST NORTH NORTHWEST SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST SOUTHEAST TO BE REMOVED 0 4 0 IND CATC 08 RH CB 64 EL-7). 12' CONC• 6'. 12' ADS 4. LE. 23+00 C41C4 TYPE „ CB RAN EL 62.00 • 22+00 .:Ea151TNG:.12 'PIPE •LE.- 41- 21+00 DRAINAGE PROFILE 1" =10' VERTICAL, 1 " =20' HORIZONTAL AS PIPE:: 57 ..... 20+00 LEVELING PADS SPAUS I.1?, Y4',1T ETTERINO TO BE RECESSED II16" A fr Tor EOLEIEll EETEEE1E 0* 2F TOP VIEW A - SECTION A -A SEE SLOT DETAIL 17 SLOT DETAIL LOCKING LID SECTION B•B NO 8' 1. WELDING IS NOT PERMITTED. 2. DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE All/16" TOLERANCE. 3. EDGES SHALL HAVE I/O RADIUS AND 1/6" CHAMFER OR COMPLETE DEBURRING. 4. THE NAME OF THE MANUFACTURER AND DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE EMBOSSED ON THE TOP SURFACE OF EACH GRATE. LETTERING TO BE RECESSED 1116". 6. EMBOSS GRATE WITH MATERIAL TYPE, DI (FOR DUCTILE IRON) OR CS (FOR CAST STEEL), NEAR THE NAME OF THE MANUFACTURER. 6. THERMOPLASTIC CATCH BASIN MARKING TO BE INSTALLED WITH ALL NEW OR ADJUSTED CATCH BASINS. EXCEPT THOSE WITH SOLID LIDS. 7. PLACE CATCH BASIN MARKING, "OUTFALL TO STREAM. DUMP NO POLLUTANTS", ON THE SURFACE OF EACH GRATE. PREFERABLY LOCATED IN THE BORDER AREA. B. LOCKING LID REQUIRED WHEN NOT INSTALLED IN A CITY STREET. TIF VANE DETAIL SECTION C-C r 0MAR INON w3mres HOT TAPE / AB95ASp APPROvt"O EIXI4 ND0UAIPINGI �� DRAINS TO /TREAM S36. CATCH BASIN MARKING NOT TO SCALE City of Tukwila CATCH BASIN & INLET VANED ORATE SHEET: D8.08 REVISION N: 08.03 AvvRovAL: B. SHELTON MORTAR FILLET 4B' DMA' 54' DMA' NAMES) fir DtAB FOR EPARATE .S CASTSIN PUCE OR PRECAST BASE JOINT DETAIL FRAME AND GRATE 0R RING AND COVER RISER OR ADJUSTMENT SECTION HANDHOLDS FRONT SUB COVER STEPS AND LADDER 1 L.- REINFORCING STEEL (FOR PRECAST SASE WITH INTEGRAL RISER) 0.1S SO IWFT N EACH DIRECTION FOR 4C 0.19 SO IN/FT IN EACH DIRECTION FOR Se PIS SO IN/FT N EACH DIRECTION FOR SB PRECAST BASE WITH INTEGRAL RISER GRAVEL BAC0FlLL FOR PIPE BEDDING, 6' MN. COMPACTED DEPTH FOR PRECAST BASES ONLY. SEPARATE CAST IN PUCE OR SEPARATE PRECAST BASE REINFORCING STEEL (FOR SEPARATE BASE ONLVI 0.25 SO IN/FT IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 4S' 0.19 SO LOFT IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 64'. 0.2S SO INIFT IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 60 NOTES: 1. HANDHOLDS IN RISER OR ADJUSTMENT SECTION SHALL HAVE 3" MIN. CLEARANCE. STEPS IN CATCH BASIN SHALL HAVE 6" MIN. CLEARANCE. NO STEPS ARE REQUIRED WHEN "8" IS 4' OR LESS. REFER TO DS-10C AND DS.11 FOR STEPS AND LADDERS. 2. PRECAST BASES SHALL HAVE CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS WITH A WALL THICKNESS OF 2" MIN. HOLE SIZE SHALL BE EOUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL THICKNESS. MAXIMUM HOLE SIZE IN 36" FOR 48" CATCH BASIN, 42" FOR 54" CATCH BASIN, AND 48" FOR 80" CATCH BASIN. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETN/EEN HOLES IS 8". 3. ALL BASE REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PLACED IN THE TOP HALF OF THE BASE, 1" MIN. CLEARANCE. 4. THE BOTTOM OF THE PRECAST CATCH BASIN MAY BE ROUNDED. 5. FRAME AND GRATE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH FLANGE DOWN OR CAST INTO RISER. 8. LOCATE STEPS AND LADDERS AWAY FROM OPENINGS AND CENTERED OVER THE MANHOLE. REFER TO DS-08 FOR VANED GRATE AND CATCH BASIN MARKINGS. NOT TO SCALE City of Tukwila CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 (48"154"I60") SHEET: DS•02 REVISION N: 08.03 MP00VAL: B. SHELTON Z a. U 0 V/ �-N 0 z a) E cd U PLANNERS SURVEYORS SHEET: 4 of 5 FI1 F. \\SIFT TO) \FN6.INFER!Nf.\279+\222R-ft10\FNGIN0002J6,\211I1R-(liAF4 I1W6 I PI21 2ATr- A/11 /7211 12'/!5, 19 AM 1 ! ASi M00!061) DATE. Alln 19 91111 11. i5 20 AM N S GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=20' 20 0 20 PROPOSAL FOR: RONG-FENG U SITE ADDRESS: 4066 S. 128TH ST. TUKWILA, WA MAIL ADDRESS: 18432 172ND CT SE RENTON, WA 98058 PHONE: (425) 652-6987 8 PVC E, W., S., SW., CTR. CNAINEL.22.J9' 5‘70E OF WATER AND SEWER PLAN LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N. W. 1/4, OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON l.9'!.!rAl L l'N. 0/ eauva4rtr cuR: (FLOWS E.) .71.86 LE.89.94 E I.E.70.0070.00 -- 3649=(C4LCb) ROLLE- IIF\\NFI TAI\FNC..INFFPINC.\2MR\2777-l1Sfi\77741FRINr.\7MF-731FS 11Wf.1 PI 7T 11ATF7 R/31/7711 in.16.74 AM I AST M(N11FIF1) 7ATF. Alin .11 77111775.0A AM 57144L7 EOCE E LE.70 47IJ LOT 1 Q 59. ' Q. FT. m S=OA'ID BY l e CT TO EEC SS B W/CUT-W '0 PVC LOT 2 6,500t SQ. 'T. CB RI 2 0/ W. I.E•49.0 I2' A05 E. LE. 48.95 WATER AND SEWER PLAN 1"=20' CH"( 'AIL CC. CLU 6' JUNIP'R 8' H ) 6' EMLOCK ROLCE 12' ADS PIPE I. . 9.98 COTTONWOOD SS 1 RIM EL..3 7 18 CONC. FLOWS S. CTI7. CHANNEL.25.07 (ACTUAI. LOCATION N01'44'291V 274.8J' OF SSMH 12) .40.79 LE. ' 59 12' 01 E EE.38.74 012' ADS S. LE.38.74 • RIM EL.41.16 9.11 .42.04 8PVC W. * 18' CONC. N., S. CM. CNANNEL.33.30 0 41 CB RIM 3 .4_.27 N. L .. . 28 I2' ADS. W. I.E.38.3I 12' ADS S. LE..38.35 ®. F ;;n 1 C) Z CC 144 174 (UJ; SURVEYORS RONC FENG LI SHORT PLAT SR N GRLt_ , SCALE 1 "=20' 20 20 PROPOSAL FOR: RONG-FENG LI SITE ADDRESS: 4066 S. 1281H ST. TUKWILA, WA MAIL ADDRESS: 18432 172ND CT SE RENTON, WA 98058 PHONE: (425) 652-6987 ALDER REMOVE EXG D/W, AS SHOWN REMOVE EXG BRICK WALL. EXTENT AS SHOWN PVC E.. W.. S., SW.. A E. (FLOWS E.) CIR. CHANN6.22.39' 4" (cum EocCact €of REMOVE EXG ASPHALT SURFACE TO W FOR REPAVING OF G D/W CB RIM ,OL-71.88 12' CO W. I.E..89.94 12' E. LE-70.00 CB 'IM L.=72.0 1 DI I.E. 0.00 Dll TR CRON ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1' =20' '3C1)I 1-1 4.6" 25' Length may be modified by inspector as site conditions warrant. 10' \ �4 142 /2 FENCE\ $. LOT 6,50Af SQ.A'T. DTL 1/2. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS EROSION CONTROL PLAN LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4, OF THE N.W. 1/4, OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANCE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 49, 12 0. W. I.E. INSTALL INLET 12' ADS E. I.E.. 48.95 PER OIL 3/2 12' ADS PIP E. 39.96 JOINTS IN FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE SPUCED AT POSTS. USE STAPLES, WIRE RINGS, OR EQUIVALENT TO ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS. 6' MAX. POST SPACING MAY BE INCREASED TO 8' IF WIRE BACKING IS USED NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE 44 7 W. L 2' DI E LE.38.74 012' ADS S. LE-38.74 c /2 RIM EL. 1.16 01 W. 1E-39.11 INSTALL INLET PROTECTION PER 011. 3/2 .4 .04 8 PVC W. k 18' CONC. N. S. C7R CriWNEL-3.3.30 CB : M E .-4227 12 CONC. N. L .3828 12' ADS. W. LE..38.31 12' ADS S. I.E-38.35 INSTALL INLET PROTECTION PER D1L 3/2 E- ®. 2"x2" BY 14 Ga. WIRE OR EQUIVALENT, IF STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC USED FILTER FABRIC-► MINIMUM 4'x4" TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE SOIL3/4'-1.5" % WASHED GRAVEL //' 2'x4' WOOD POSTS, STEEL FENCE POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUIVALENT DTL 2/2. SILT FENCE NTS GRADING AND ER 1. THE ER09O1 PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) MEASURES ON THE APPROVED PLANS ARE MIN*IUM REQUIREMENTS 2. BEFORE BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIMTIES, ESTABUS I THE CLEARING UNITS, INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AND INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES 3. BEFORE ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS, ALL DOWNSTREAM EROSION PREVEN710N AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (ESC) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL ESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE ESC PLAN. 4. ESC MEASURES, INCLUDING ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STE CONSTRUCTION IS CWIPIETED AND PERMANENT STABBRATION S ESTABLISHED. 5. FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT BALL REMAIN UNMOVED FOR SEVEN DAYS OR MORE. 6. FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30, PROVIDE TEHPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL REMAIN UNSAVED FOR TWO DAYS OR MORE. N ADDITION TO COVER MEASURES, TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL: A PROTECT STOCKPILES AND STEEP CUT AND FILL SLOPES IF UNWORKED FOR MORE MAN 12 HOURS B. STOCKPILE, ON STE, ENOUGH COVER MATERIALS TO COVER ALL DISTURBED AREAS C. 8Y OCTOBER 8, SEED AU. AREAS MAT BALL REMAIN UNWORKEO DURING THE WET SEASON (OCTOBER I THROUGH APRIL 30). MULCH ALL MEMO AREAS 7. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ESC MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE BATH THE APPROVED MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE MAY RESULT IN THE WORK BEING PERFORMED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE DIRECTOR AND ASSESSED AS A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY WHERE SUCH FACILITIES ARE LOCATED. 8. WRING THE LIFE OF ME PROJECT, THE PERMITTED SHALL MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION AND PROMPTLY REPAIR, RESTORE, OR REPLACE ALL GRADE SURFACES: WALLS, DRAINS, DAMS, STRUCTURES, VEGETATION, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, AND OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE YAM APPROVED PLANS HIGHLY VISIBLE FENCE (ORANGE) USE GUARDIAN BY TENAX OR SMIWR THAT IS APPROVED BY CRY INSPECTOR SOLID WALLS FILTER MEDIA FOR DEWATERING OSION CONTROL NOTES 9. THE PERNITTEE SHALL MONITOR THE DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE FEATURES, AND SHALL, WITH THE DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL, REMOVE Ni SEDIMENT DEPOSITION RESULTING FROM PROJECT RELATED WORK. 10. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL BE PER APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. THE PERMITTED IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ASSOCIATED PERMITS ON THE JOB SITE. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE TAM ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL TAWS. 11. AS THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS, THE PERMIT1EE SHALL INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PER THE ESC AND SHALL INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES BEFORE ANY STE DISTURBANCE OCCURS. BEFORE THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE BEHOVED, INSTALL AND ESTABLISH THE UPSTREAM PERMANENT ESC MEASURES 12. ME PERMITTED SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROTECT SENSITIVE AREAS, THEIR BUFFERS, AND ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND PUBUC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR EASEMENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING GRADING OPERATIONS THE PERM111EE SHALL RESTORE, TO THE STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT 1HE DYE OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT, SENSITIVE AREAS, M0R BUFFERS, AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE PERMITRE'S OPERATIONS 13. PERMITIEE SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND COMPLY WITH ME FOLOBANC: A NOTIFY THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT WITHIN 48 HOURS FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF ESC MEASURES. B. OBTAIN PERMIS90N IN WRITING FROM THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR To MODIFYING THE ESC PLAN. C. MAINTAIN ALL ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER FAOURES AS IDENTIFIED IN THE ESC PLAN. D. REPAIR ANY SILTATION OR EROSON DAMAGES TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND DRAINAGE FAOUTIES E INSPECT ACCORDING TO DIE APPROVED ESC INSPECTION SCHEDULE AND MAKE NEEDED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX 3t Weight R Purity 7L Germination Chewings or red fescue I•sOvao rubra van con muraa or Psatuoa rubs 40 98 90 Annual or perennial rye LoMum muWtVlorvm or loitum pmrw 40 98 90 Redtop or colonial bentgrass I9rostRs alba or Agrostb rout, 10 92 85 White dutch clover fl{Y*Mwn 10 98 90 roans CATCH BASIN �� GRATE ' III I OVERFLOW ll POROUS BOTTOM ll NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS ONLY SCHEMATIC. ANY INSERT IS ALLOWED THAT HAS A MIN. 0.5 C.F. OF STORAGE, THE MEANS TO DEWATER THE STORED SEDIMENT, AN OVERFLOW, AND CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED. 0""tF:;r9/r'r' DTL 3/2. INLET PROTECTION SEP 14 20111 NTS D Lvi.Lo- '1r)Y 'If' S 1-4 CC Cg W RONC FENC LI SHORT PLAT cn 06 W z z a_ SURVEYORS ENGINEERS, m itF•\\ PP! TA1\FNIINFFRIWP,\202A\91111A-fill\FN4INFFRING\2008-1116FJ TINT. l PI OT RATE• P/.31/7011 1n.nR, N1 AM I IAGT M00IFIFD PAW. Ann 19 9011 11'15.5S AM