Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL11-041 - JACKSONS FOOD STORE #631 - DESIGN REVIEWJACKSONS FOOD STORE 13138 INTERURBAN AVE S PL1 1-041 LII-029 DESIGN REVIEW - ADMINISTRATIVE City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION August 1, 2010 TO: Caryl Mattson, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Applicant PacWest Energy, LLC, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction All Parties of Record This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to the Permit Application Types and Procedures Chapter of the Tukwila Zoning Code, Notice of Decision section, (TMC 18.104.170) on the following project and land use approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L11-029 Jacksons Food Store #631 Applicant: Caryl Mattson, Barghausen Consulting Engineers Type of Permit Applied for: Administrative Design Review Project Description: Redevelopment of an existing food store, car wash and gas station with a 1,619 square foot food store, a 1,035 square foot training space for Jacksons' employees, and a 2,120 square foot canopy to cover the two gas pump islands Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: 13138 Interurban Avenue S. L10-070 (Special Permission - Parking Determination) C11-005 (Public Works Demolition) Commercial/Light Industrial 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City of Tukwila SEPA Responsible Official has previously deteunined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application described above does comply with applicable City and State code requirements and has approved that application, subject to the conditions which are set forth in this Decision based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. Conditions of Approval: Provide with the building permit application the following changes and addition: 1. A modified landscape plan that provides a specification for planting compliance with the 90% ground coverage within three years, remove the remarks section specifying a 16 inch separation standard and replace with planting diagrams; increase plant density of Kinnikinnick. 2. An elevation from a catalogue cut sheet for a trash receptacle that complements the building's character and materials. 3. Mechanical equipment details and drawings. If the scale of any rooftop equipment is so large that screening materials becomes a design component of the building's character, then increasing the height of the parapet walls will be required. In any case, mechanical equipment will be required to be screened. 4. Modified canopy elevations that include a 28" square masonry base around the bottom of each canopy column that extends up from the grade of the drive slabs 5'-4". III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this application is a Type 2 decision and is made pursuant to the Classification of Project Permit Applications Section of the Tukwila Zoning Code (TMC 18.104.010.) One administrative appeal to the Board of Architectural Review of the Decision on the land use approval itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Board of Architectural Review decision. Page 2 of 4 IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision that is by August 15, 2011. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in the Appeal Processes Chapter of the Tukwila Zoning Code (TMC 18.116.) All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the approval shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Board of Architectural Review based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Board of Architectural Review decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Board of Architectural Review decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions Chapter of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C.) If no appeal of the Board of Architectural Review decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this approval will be final. Page 3 of 4 VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Moira Carr Bradshaw, who may be contacted at 206-431-3651 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Dep-nt of Community Development City o ukwila H:UacksonsUacksons NOD.doc PaoPdnfd name PacWest Energy LLC Seattle City Light Ken Stoner Caryl Mattson KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE DEFT OF ECOLOGY company Environment and Safety Division Qwest Communications Barghausen Consulting Engineers ACCOUNTING DIVISION NW REGIONAL OFFICE address street 3450 E. Commercial Street P.O. Box 34023 23315 66 Avenue S. 18215 72 Avenue S. 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A 3190 160th AVE SE city st Meridian ID Seattle WA Kent WA Kent WA SEATTLE WA BELLEVUE WA zip 83642 98124 98032 98032 98104 98008 owl a f 5 mit a Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 2 day of August in the year 2011 Project Name: Jacksons Food Stores Project Number: PL10-057 Associated File Number (s): L11-029 Mailing requested by: Moira Bradshaw Mailer's signature: W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVI'I' OF DISTRIBUI'ION.DOC Jacksons — Phone discussion with Moira Bradshaw 6-7-2011 with Caryl Mattson, BCE. Landscaping Add a landscape island in the stalls along City Light property per Interior Parking Lot Landscaping requirement (TMC 18.52.035.) The Landscape chapter requires 450 square feet of landscaping for 30 parking stalls plus 1620 square feet for the perimeter side yard and 1850 square feet for the perimeter front yard or a total of 3,920 square feet. A rough calculation on by me indicates that the site has about 2,319 square feet of landscaping. Please give some thought as to how the site can be developed with more landscaping. (as discussed, this area is not owned by PacWest/Jacksons; the parking determination was for the use of the parking stalls only. Moira will discuss this internally with Minnie and get back to BCE with their thoughts) Prunus laurocerasus (English Laurel) is not an appropriate shrub along the west elevation where there are windows. Please choose an evergreen that has a maximum height of Tess than four feet. (as discussed, we will have our landscape architect chose a different species) The ground cover will need to be increase and placed closer to the shrubs, prefer one foot instead of 16 inches from the edge of the shrubs. Kinnikinnick prefers sun to part shade and is therefore not a good choice for the north side of the building under shrubs and trees. Please provide an alternate plant. (as discussed, we will have our landscape architect chose a different species) Please provide the following for review: Copy of easement description for the south 24 feet easement (provide a copy of the ALTA survey) Copy of recorded parking easement (the recording number was provided to Moira 6-7-2011) Sample of split face concrete masonry or veneer (a photo will suffice that shows color) (explained and not required; 16" diameter hollow steel tube) Sample of curved aluminum or ACM fascia (color photo from Shell Design Stds will be provided) Catalogue cut sheet for canopies. (color photo from Shell Design Stds will be provided) Free standing pole light elevation or catalogue cut sheets/specifications (a cut sheet of the area Tight/pole will be provided) Parking Need to provide 2-3 bike parking spots (provide our standard bike rack; 2 bike capacity; with cut sheet) Signage Please confirm the existence of the freestanding sign on City Light property. If that is to be maintained, is it in conformance with the recently adopted sign code? (as discussed, nothing needs to be done in regards to this sign) The canopy logos for Shell do not appear to be allowed per the City's sign code and only one wall mounted sign is allowed. The new sign code allows a variety of additional types of signs. Please refer to TMC 19.20.050 for the options. (as discussed, these signs will be under a separate sign permit and can be made a condition of approval for the ADR) Address the capping of the car wash drain to sewer. (as discussed, this will be addressed with the civil site plan, which will be submitted with the building permit application; site plan notes to remove the oil/water separator serving the old car wash) Address the storm drainage problem at the NE corner of the parking Lot. (as discussed, this will be addressed with the civil site plan to be prepared with building permit application) Cross connection control (RPPA on domestic, DDCUA for fire DCVA for irrigation) — (show new water line installed by the City. Where are these located on the plan? (the new water line will be indicated on the site plan. Moira will discuss the preferred location of these items with Public Works and contact BCE with the information. The location(s) of these will then need to be added to the site plan.) Please confirm that the area under the canopy drains to the sewer via an oil/water separator. bruce TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number PL10-057 L11-029 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works l.Ul Fire Dept. Police Dept. ❑I Parks/Rec Project: Jacksons Food Store Address: 13138 Interurban Avenue S. Date transmitted: May 3, 2011 Response requested by: 20 May 2011 Staff coordinator: Moira Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: k� \ Comments \` e; Update date: \ \ �� prepared by: 51 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number PL10-057 L11-029 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works 0 Fire Dept. Police Dept. elD Parks/Rec Project: Jacksons Food Store Address: 13138 Interurban Avenue S. Date transmitted: May 3, 2011 Response requested by: 20 May 2011 Staff coordinator: Moira Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) De. 0,00 d FZed ,oe isesk Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number PL10-057 L11-029 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: L. Building Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: Jacksons Food Store Address: 13138 Interurban Avenue S. Date transmitted: May 3, 2011 Response requested by: 20 May 2011 Staff coordinator: Moira Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date C / Comments Update date: ��5 (( prepared by: City of Tukwila RECEIVED Department of Community Development MAT 032011 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number PL10-057 L11-029 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: in Building Planning D Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: Jacksons Food Store Address: 13138 Interurban Avenue S. Date transmitted: May 3, 2011 Response requested by: 20 May 2011 Staff coordinator: Moira Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 1typ h ShQL 51,4,1)i J c Cak" 'case *Akko-kt iv Ft() a‹-t-cd moo , 2) The e reA( 424, Lt s acifrfAva Gs/ ?t & gjor,„,,,k a was ;S elani44.44,1 the oziolgs/ - wk Plan check/date: - Comments J4'Pate,�a,SiA Uddate: prepared by: ,-D/2o4_ 0/tela £fits, .tr i„ .0 2T GQ� QA- ©e L' /ter I °'k✓ ! fr 1 6/rare As,e,j� ; % ezd `M ,t3e U-4 L./ From: Cyndy Knighton To: Joanna Spencer Date: 06/10/2010 1:12 PM Subject: Re: Jackson Food Stores/Gas Sta @ 13138 Interurban Ave S PRE10-012 Adding additional SF to theconvenience market may generate more trips, but the primary generator is the number of gas pumps. I would argue that the additional retail space is a wash, therefore no concurrency, no impact fees. I have no idea what a "private employee training center" is but it is almost doubling the building space (KCA shows 1363 net sf today). I would need to know more information as to what this is before ANY determination is made on impact fees. For now, not knowing anything more, I'd say the concurrency fee for office would seem appropriate given what we know, but it could be subject to change pending further discovery. Cyndy »> On 06/10/2010 at 11:50 AM, Joanna Spencer <Joanna@ci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > Cyndy, > The proposal calls for adding 434 sq ft addition to the mini -market (space > used to be a car wash but not used in the last 10+ years) and adding a brand > new 1,035 sq ft for a private employee training center, > conference/office/training room. > For Traffic Conc Cert Application can we lump both uses into one and charge > them •$1800 a"s office<5,000 sq ft or we need to charge as retail $2700+office > $1800 > which brings the application fee to $4,500.00 > Traffic Impact fee (zone 2): > 434 sq ft x (Convenience Market) $11.25 = $4882.50 > 1,035 sq ft x (Admin Office) $6.33= $6551.55 > Total: $11434.05 > I need your input for today pre-ap. > Thanks, > Joanna TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number PL10-057 L11-029 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM D- Building Planning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. , L Parks/Rec Project: Jacksons Food Store Address: 13138 Interurban Avenue S. Date transmitted: May 3, 2011 Response requested by: 20 May 2011 Staff coordinator: Moira Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: Howard R12-Aspen Series 12 Jon Litter/Trash Receptacle - Commerc' Trash Recept... Page 1 of 3 Categories Restaurant Trash Receptacles Recycle Containers Commercial Trash Receptacles Glaro RecyclePro Receptacles Witt Trash Receptacles Concrete Waste Receptacles Cigarette Disposal Units Rubbermaid Recycle Stations Site Furnishings Bags & Can Liners Hospitality Business Products Glaro Color Chart Bestsellers 1. Howard Aspen R48HTWU 48 Gallon Hinged Top Waste Receptacle With Weather Urn 2. Howard R18SU- Aspen Series 24 Gallon Litter Receptacle 3. Howard R48HT- Aspen Series 48 Gallon Large Capacity Litter Receptacle 4. Howard R41-Aspen Series 2.5 Gallon Sand Urn Litter Receptacle 5. Howard R12SU- Aspen Series 12 Gallon Sand Urn Litter/Trash Receptacle Special Home :: Commercial Trash Receotacles :. Trash Cans :: Howard Asoen Series :: Howard R12-Aspen Series 12 Gallon Litter/Trash Receptacle Howard R12-Aspen Series 12 Gallon Litter/Trash Receptacle Howard R12-Aspen Series 12 Gallon Litter/Trash Receptacle Unique Features & Benefits: Four 5" H x 9" W disposal openings allow insertion of trash from all directions. Heavy duty hot dipped galvanized steel construction withstands years of exposure to the elements. Lift off top permits removal of 12 gal. Germ -Fighter® rigid plastic liner. Built in anchoring system (requires AB-1 bolt) allows for permanent placement. Germ -Fighter® rigid plastic liner controls odors and many germs that are harmful to humans. Drain holes in base prevent water accumulation. Stainless steel legs. Shipped fully assembled and ready to use. Full sized galvanized steel panels welded behind all stone panels for added strength. Specifications: Dimensions: 13 1/2" Sq x 32" H Weight: 52 lbs. Finish: #201 - Brown Trim with Desert Brown Stone Panels #202 - Empire Green Trim with Desert Brown Stone Panels #2000 - Gray Trim with Dove Gray Stone Panels #6000 - Architectural Bronze with Glacier Gray Stone Panels Capacity: 12 gal. - Germ -Fighter® rigid plastic liner Carton Pack: One per carton UPS: Can ship UPS Manufactured with over 30% recycled steel and is 100% post consumer recyclable. Constructed of heavy duty galvanized steel. Also available with 12 gal. galvanized steel liner. Your cart Cart is empty Wish list Authentication Sign in Register Forgot password? Resources 08-29-2010 All news Subscribe http://www.trashreceptacles.biz/howard-r12-aspen-series-12-gallon-litter-trash-receptacle.... 9/30/2011 United Receptacle Aspen Serie- / Rubbermaid Landmark Steel Containe-- R12 Aspen Se... Page 1 of 2 Microfiber Cleaning Products Technical Concepts Inovative Hygiene Solutions Cleaning Supplies Decorative Indoor Trash Cans Outdoor Waste Receptacles Trash Cans Rubbermaid Recycling Containers Slim Jim Waste Containers Food Service Equipment Rubbermaid Utility Carts Caution Signs / Cones and Safety Barriers Tilt Trucks Hand Trucks Platform Carts/Trucks Rubbermaid Heavy Duty Convertible Trucks and Carts Rubbermaid Vacuums and Carpet Sweepers Washroom Accessories Smoking Management Solutions Rubbermaid Dunnage Racks Pelouze Scales Storage Containers Agriculture Carts Volume Discounts Clearance Sale Special Order Policies ir. stWara n GeoTtwY i disc m ..•a. 26-Sep-11 17:28 GMT FREE SHIPPING _�drr...N• 5� e ""l 1 • Rubbermaid fake Advantage of our 1st T me Buyer Discount! It's easy. F 3oni ry it tti 41 gja-l's14I�9 = 499 a n I/ 14 t4s Huge inventory of Area Rugs! Wide selection 8. discount prices on popular styles R12 Aspen Series Litter Receptacle Specifications: • Dimensions: 13 1/2" Sq x 32" H • Weight: 52 Ibs. • Finish: #201 - Brown Trim with Desert Brown Stone Panels #202 - Empire Green Trim with Desert Brown Stone Panels #2000 - Gray Trim with Dove Gray Stone Panels #6000 - Architectural Bronze with Glacier Gray Stone Panels • Capacity: 12 gal. - Germ -Fighter® rigid plastic liner • Carton Pack: One per carton • UPS: Can ship UPS • Manufactured with over 30% recycled steel and is 100% post consumer recyclable. • Constructed of heavy duty galvanized steel. • Also available with 12 gal. galvanized steel liner. Unique Features & Benefits: • Four 5" H x 9" W disposal openings allow insertion of trash from all directions. • Heavy duty hot dipped galvanized steel construction withstands years of exposure to the elements. • Lilt off top permits removal of 12 gal. Germ -Fighter® rigid plastic liner. • Built in anchoring system (requires AB-1 bolt) allows for permanent placement. • Germ -Fighter® rigid plastic liner controls odors and many germs that are harmful to humans. • Drain holes in base prevent water accumulation. • Stainless steel legs. • Shipped fully assembled and ready to use. • Full sized galvanized steel panels welded behind all stone panels for added strength. $325.00 Choose Finish #201 - Brown #202 - Trim Empire with Green Trim Desert with Desert Brown Brown Stone Stone Panels Panels #2000 - Gray Trim with Dove Gray Stone Panels Qty:I' — #6000 - Architectural Bronze with Glacier Gray Stone Panels Rt22000 Add to Hack• t Recently Visited Pages • United Receptacle Aspen Series / Rubbermaid Landmark Steel Containers home I policies I my account 1 contact us http://www.rubbermaidcommercialproducts.com/c36/c 1 89/R12-Aspen-Series-Litter-Recep... 9/26/2011 Moira Bradshaw Senior Planner City of Tukwila -2- July 13, 2011 Response: • One (1) copy of the ALTA survey is provided which shows the 24-foot ingress/egress easement. • One (1) copy of the parking easement is provided. • One (1) sample of the split face concrete masonry is provided (please return to Barghausen). • One (1) sample of the ACM fascia material is provided; color Red. This red will also be the color of the storefront window and door frames and the awnings (please return to Barghausen). • One (1) photograph of a typical Shell canopy is provided. • One (1) sample each of the building wall colors and material; "Thermocromex" in colors Seneca and Serpentine (please return to Barghausen). • One (1) paint sample for the top of wall cornice; color "Deer Valley" (please return to Barghausen). Parking Need to provide 2-3 bike parking spots Response: • A bike rack has been added to front wall of the building, shown on AS.1 and A2.1; capacity is two (2) bicycles. Signage Please confirm the existence of the freestanding sign on City Light property. If that is to be maintained, is it in conformance with the recently adopted sign code? The canopy logos for Shell do not appear to be allowed per the City's sign code and only one wall mounted sign is allowed. The new sign code allows a variety of additional types of signs. Please refer to TMC 19.20.050 for the options. Address the capping of the car wash drain to sewer. Address the storm drainage problem at the NE corner of the parking Lot. Cross connection control (RPPA on domestic, DDCUA for fire DCVA for irrigation) — show new water line installed by the City. Where are these located on the plan? Please confirm that the area under the canopy drains to the sewer via an oil/water separator. Response: • The freestanding sign does exist on the City Light property. The owner, PacWest Energy, has a easement with City Light for this sign. This sign will remain in its present non -conforming state. • The canopy logo's have been removed from the project. • One (1) "Jacksons" wall sign has been removed from the project. The "Jacksons" sign facing Interurban will remain. • All civil related comments will be addressed on our civil engineering plans. We have shown the approximate location of the new water line and its connection to our existing water meter; the RPPA will be provided in an approved vault adjacent to the water meter. • The area under canopy currently drains to the sewer via an oil/water separator; this will continue with when the new canopy is constructed. We are submitting the following plans in addition to any cut sheets and materials noted previously: • One (1) 11- by 17-inch set of all plan sheets Moira Bradshaw Senior Planner City of Tukwila -3- July 13, 2011 • Five (5) sets of plans consisting of the Site Plan, Photometric Plan, Landscape Plan, Exterior Elevations and Canopy Elevations. We look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel to contact me with any questions at 425.656.1063 or email cmattson(a�barghausen.com. Sincerely, attA.6-K, Caryl J. Mattson Design Engineer CJM/cm 14700c.003.doc Enc: As noted cc: Jack Davis, Jacksons Food Stores via email Jason O'Very, Jacksons Food Stores via email Dan Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. Mark Peterson, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. July 13, 2011 HAND DELIVERED Moira Bradshaw, AICP Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Administrative Design Review L11-029 City of Tukwila File Nos. PL10-057, PRE10-012, and L10-070 13138 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington Jacksons Food Store No. 631 / Our Job No. 14700 Dear Moira, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PL } l lED `JUL' 18 20111 ceVaPPAITAT Based on our conversations and the receipt of an document received via email on June 2, 2011; we have made the following revisions; your comments are in italics: Landscaping Add a landscape island in the stalls along City Light property per Interior Parking Lot Landscaping requirement (TMC 18.52.035.) The Landscape chapter requires 450 square feet of landscaping for 30 parking stalls plus 1620 square feet for the perimeter side yard and 1850 square feet for the perimeter front yard or a total of 3,920 square feet. A rough calculation on by me indicates that the site has about 2,319 square feet of landscaping. Please give some thought as to how the site can be developed with more landscaping. Response: • A landscape island has been added along the Seattle City Light property; resulting in the loss of one (1) parking stall in that area. Between the on -site parking stalls and the off -site parking stalls, we are now at 29 in total. Our on -site parking is 8; which requires 120sf of interior parking lot landscape; which we have provided 124.4sf. Total onsite landscape provided is 1,677sf; with the additional off -site landscaping we are providing 2,6478sf. • Please review the revised landscape plan; our landscape architect has made adjustments where appropriate in regard to shrubs and groundcover. The building is oriented in such a way that the northeast and northwest planters will receive sunlight throughout the day. • Per our meeting on July 6th, 2011 we have added the 12.5-feet of landscaping along the City Light property. Please provide the following for review: Copy of easement description for the south 24 feet easement; Copy of recorded parking easement Sample of split face concrete masonry or veneer Sample of curved aluminum or ACM fascia Catalogue cut sheet for canopies. Free standing pole light elevation or catalogue cut sheets/specifications 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES ♦ OLYMPIA, WA • CONCORD, CA • TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.com LED AREA LIGHT - MEDIUM (XAM3) LIGHT OUTPUT - XAM3 Distribution Lumens (Nominal) 350mA 450mA Type2 9770 11960 Type 3 9549 10437 Type FT 10028 12342 Type 5 9148 10396 Input Power 138 watts 184 watts 10/25/10 © 2010 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Proles Name Bothell Jacksons oss over' SOLID-STATE LIGHTING U.S. and international patents pending EXPECTED LIFE - Minimum 60,000 hours to 100,000 hours depending upon the ambient temperature of the installation location. See LSI web site for specific guidance. LEDS - Select high -brightness LEDs. 5800°K color temperature (nominal). DISTRIBUTION/PERFORMANCE - Types 2, 3, FT and 5. Exceptional uniformity creates bright environment at lower light levels. Improved backlight cutoff minimizes light trespass. HOUSING - Die -formed aluminum. Weather -tight housing contains factory prewired driver and field connections. Wiring access door (with safety lanyard) is located undemeath and utilizes tool -less thumbscrew fastener. OPTICAL UNIT - Clear tempered optical grade flat glass lens sealed to aluminum optics housing creates an IP67 rated, sealed optical unit. Pressure stabilizing breather allows super -tight IP67 protection while preventing temperature cycling from building up intemal pressures and vacuums that can stress optical unit seals and components. Optical unit lanyard serves dual purposes of safety and provides positive ground between unit and housing. MOUNTING - Tapered rear design allows fixtures to be mounted in a quad pattem without the need for extension arms. Use with Crossover steel round and steel square poles. See separate data sheets. ELECTRICAL - A terminal block for attachment of incoming primary wiring is supplied. Two -stage surge protection (including separate surge protection built into electronic driver) meets IEEE C62.41.2, Scenario 1, Location Category C-Medium standards (10KV, 5KA). Available with universal voltage power supply 120-277VAC (50/60Hz input), 347VAC and 480VAC. Optional twistlock photocell receptacle is available. Photocell must be ordered separately. Optional button -type photocells (PCI) are also available in 120, 208, 240, 277 or 347 volt (supply voltage must be specified). DRIVER - Available in 350mA and 450mA drive currents (Drive currents are factory programmed). State-of-the-art driver technology designed specifically for LSI LED Tight sources provides unsurpassed system efficiency. Components are fully encased in potting material for IP68 moisture resistance. Driver complies with IEC and FCC standards. Driver can be easily accessed and removed without the use of tools. OPERATING TEMPERATURE - -40°C to +50°C (-40°F to +122°F). FINISH - Fixtures are finished with LSI's DuraGrip ® polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling, and is guaranteed for five full years. Standard colors include bronze, black, platinum plus, buff, graphite, satin verde green, metallic silver and white. WARRANTY - LSI LED fixtures carry a limited 5-year warranty. PHOTOMETRICS - Application layouts are available upon request. Contact LSI Applications Group at lighting.apps@Isi-industries.com SHIPPING WEIGHT (in carton) - 34.6 Ibs (16 kg) LISTING - ETL listed to U.S. and International safety standards. Suitable for wet locations. This product, or selected versions of this product, meet the standards listed below. Please consult factory for your specific requirements. 111 Mork= Mode catalog # XAN3 3 LED 119 350 CW YE BRZ IP67 (E Intertek Suitable for wet locations Not all versions of this product are CE certified. I FlxtureType S1 RoHS C 0 COMPLIANT A company pith • S.r,CSfwion LED AREA LIGHT - MEDIUM (XAM3) osiver® SOLID-STATE LIGHTING LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE: XAM3 2 LED 119 350 CW UE WHT PCI120 Prefix AM3 - LED Area Medium Distribution Light Source # of LEDs Drive Current 2-Type2 3 - Type 3 FT • Forward Throw 5-Type 5 LED 119 y 350 - 350mA 450 - 450mA LED Color Temerature Line Voltage Luminaire Finish CW - Cool White (5800°( nom.) UE - Universal Voltage (120-277) 347 480 BLK - Black BRZ - Bronze BUF- Buff GPT - Graphite MSV - Metalic Silver PIP - Platinum Plus SVG - Satin Verde Green WHT - White Options Button Type Photocells PCI 120 - 120v PCI 208 - 208v PCI 240 - 240v PCI 277 - 277v PCI 347 - 347v PCR - Twistlock Photoelectric Control Receptacle LUMINAIRE EPA CHART2 - XAM3 •M Single 1.2 i• w1 D180- 2.4 111� 090• 2.0 Al T90- 3.4 olo TN120- 3.4 + OW 4.0 DIMENSIONS Wall Bracket 1 8" (203mm) 6„ (152mm) Front View ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION Description BKA-XBO-EC-6-CLR 6' Extension Arm (Accessories are field installed) Order Number 382136CLR' BKS-XBO-WM-'-CLR Wall Mounting Bracket 382132CLR' XAM3 FT HSS - House Side Shield (black only - rear mouln)z 439436 DVS - Direct View Shield (rear mount onlv)2 390687CLR X4RPP Round Pole Plate for 4' Poles 379967CLR' 11/18" 4-3/4"-4 (18mm) (121mm) — 8" (203mm) 8-12" r(165mmfl 0 0 0 X5RPP Round Pole Plate for 5' Poles 379968CLR' PC 120 - Photocell for use w/ PCR option (120Vp 122514 PC 208-277 - Photocell for use w/ PCR option (208V, 240V or 277V)3 122515 PC 347 - Photocell for use w/ PCR option (347V), 159516 PC 480 - Photocell for use w/ PCR option (480V)3 1225180 51/2" (140 mm) Top View 32"(813 mud Side View Round Pole Plate I. Accessory 1 1/4" 12" (1) 2 3/- 8" (82mm) �2 9/1 (mil GP1=r/ it=2.5 (X5RPP) • R=2.0 ((41111P) . Front View 1612" (419 mm) NOTES: 1- Replace'CLR' with desired color (ex. 382136BRZ) 2- Direct View Shield and House Side Shield add to fixture EPA. Consult factory. 3- Factory installed PCR option required. See Options. 1 Bottom View 6" Extension Arm Accessory 2 9/16" O 3 5116" (84) 6" (152 *s) DVS - Direct View Shield (390687CLR) 32" (813 mm) 10/25/10 ©2010 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. 5-12" (140 mm) 8" (152 mm) Protect Name Bothell Jacksons Catalog # XAN3 3 LED 119 350 CW YE BRZ I Fixture Type S1 w Company with a Sn...rY...... CfbverM SOLID-STATE LIGHTING GENERATION 3 We asked what you wanted... You answered, "the features we love in the Scottsdale. " • Brilliance • Aesthetics • Easy installation • Virtually no maintenance • Significantly reduced energy consumption Introducing the Most Brilliant Solution in Canopy Lighting Since the Scottsdale® LIGHTING PERFORMANCE Multiple optics and drive current choices means you can create the environment that best suits your needs Ten lumen output choices From the soft appeal of symmetrical and asymmetrical illumination to Scottsdale -style lighting brilliance, you have your choice with LSI's Crossover Gen 3 Easy to clean, clear tempered glass lens protects LED chips from the elements to ensure illumination quality for the lifetime of the fixture GENERATION 3 EASY INSTALLATION Fastest, easiest install in the industry - installs in less than half the time compared to competitors' designs Replaces Scottsdale and Scottsdale -style fixtures with no cutting or drilling the deck - no need to relocate electrical source :: For new canopies — installs like the Scottsdale and with no sealant required! LOWER OPERATING COST n Patented Smartfec intelligence and reflector technology ensure optimum I'ght output with significant enemy savings n Intelligent thermal diagnostics guard driver and optical components against extreme operating conditions ❑ The only fixture an the market rrith IP65, IP66 and IP6/ ratings prevents moisture and dirt from entering the fixt_.re result ng in overall lowest maintenance and longest fixture attractiveness life span in the industry Unique breathable design eliminates internal pressure hued up Shell RVI Evolution Design Standards Approach > Canopy > Role and Design Clearly Shell The Canopy edge branding and treatment are a principal means by which our custom- ers recognize Shell sites. The distinctive use of color and the Shell Pecten help long- distance identification and contribute to the overall Shell branding. Main Features The internally -illuminated Pecten on a non -illuminated white panel appears on all RVI Evolution levels. The Level 1 Canopy edge treatment consists of a Shell Yellow curved aluminum or ACM fascia panel attached to a Shell White flat ACM fascia, while an internally -illuminated LED Shell Red bar provides both red illumination to the bar and face illumination to the yellow field. Corners Both internal and external corners of the Canopy edge should be exposed with the fascia Branding Strip stopping 300mm (12") short of the corner. Curved aluminum or ACM fascia rs 2) )9 shell C I Frodut, US kVI Evd..-:.w De _,gn Standard: 1'01, l / \VS US Shell Pecten Panel Internally illuminated red bar White fascia panel exposed at corners i After RecordingReturn to: 20110418000041 BARGHAUSEN CON MISC 85.00 PAGE-001 OF 004 04/18/2011 09:15 City of Tukwila KING COUNTY, UA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED rJUL413 2011I COMMUN DEVELOPI ff Title: Acknowledgment of Continued Compliance with City of Tukwila Parking Requirements Grantor: PacWest Energy, LLC Grantee: City of Tukwila Abbreviated Legal Description: Parcel A: That portion of Stephen Foster Donation Land Claim No. 38 in the NE Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 N., Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington. (Full Legal on Exhibit A) Parcel B: That portion of Stephen Foster Donation Land Claim No. 38 in the NE Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington. (Full Legal on Exhibit A) Parcel C: A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress and for utilities, sewers, gas lines ... (Full Legal on Exhibit A) Parcel D: A non-exclusive easement for access road and utility purposes over that portion ... (Full Legal on Exhibit A) Tax Parcel No.: 0003000108 Related Documents: None {01490671.DOC;1 } ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CONTINUED COMPLIANCE: WITH CITY OF TUKWILA PARKING REQUIREMENTS Property Owner: Pac\West Lnerfgy. LLC: king Count}- Assessor's Tay Parcel ID No.: 0003000 I 08 Permit Applications: Types of permits sought: Date of application: \pplication number: Tenant 1t provenenhJlluil(linL; Permit Pacwest Energy, LLC ("Owner") is seeking a [permit type] from the City of Tukwila. A prerequisite for receiving the permit is compliance with the City's parking requirements as specified in chapter 18.56 of the Tukwila Municipal Code ("TMC"). The parking requirements have been satisfied by Owner obtaining a Temporary Permit from the City of Seattle -City Light Department (P.M. #230415-1-423, granted September 8, 2010). This Temporary Permit provide Owner with sufficient parking on property owned by City of Seattle that is adjacent to Owner's property. Owner acknowledges that the parking requirements of TMC 18.56 are an on -going requirement and that in the event the Temporary Permit is revoked or expires, Owner is still obligated to comply with the parking requirements established by the City of Tukwila. Dated: John D. Jackson, Manager PacWest Energy, LLC Exhibit A (Legal Description) Tax Parcel: 00300-0108-08 PARCEL A: That portion of Stephen Foster Donation Land Claim No. 38 in the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of 48th Avenue South, granted by the City of Seattle to the State of Washington as provided by Ordinance Number 93708 of the City of Seattle and recorded under Auditor's File Number 6313596, in King County, Washington, with the Northeasterly Margin of the City of Seattle transmission line right of way (formerly Puget Sound Electric Railway Right of Way); Thence North 49°24'00" West, along said Northeasterly Margin, 22.50 Feet; Thence North 40°36'00" East, parallel to said 48th Avenue South, 24.00 feet to the true point of beginning; Thence North 49°24'00" West, parallel to said Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way, 165.50 feet; Thence North 40°36'00" East, 126.00 Feet; Thence South 49°24'00" East, 165.50 Feet; Thence South 40°36'00" West, 126.00 Feet to the true point of beginning; Except that portion thereof conveyed to the City of Tukwila by Deed recorded under Auditor's File Number 6664371. PARCEL B: That portion of Stephen Foster Donation Land Claim No. 38. In the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of 48th Avenue South, granted by the City of Seattle to the State of Washington as provided by Ordinance Number 93708 of the City of Seattle and recorded under Auditor's File Number 6313596, in King County, Washington, with the Northeasterly margin of City of Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way (formerly Puget Sound Electric Railway Right of Way); Thence North 49°24'00" West, along said Northeasterly Margin, 22.50 feet to the true point of beginning; Continuing thence North 49°24'00" West, along said Northeasterly Margin, 165.50 Feet; Thence 40°36'00" East, Parallel to said 48th Avenue South, 24.00 Feet; Thence South 49°24'00" East, Parallel to said Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way, 165.50 Feet; Thence South 40°36'00" West, 24.00 Feet to the true point of beginning; Except that portion thereof conveyed to the City of Tukwila by Deed recorded under Auditor's File Number 6664371. { 01490671.DOC;1 } PARCEL C: A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress and for utilities, sewers, gas lines and other similar uses in and over that portion of Stephen Foster Donation Land Claim No. 38 in the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of 48th Avenue South, granted by the City of Seattle to the State of Washington as provided by Ordinance Number 93708 of the City of Seattle and recorded under Auditor's File Number 6313596, in King County, Washington, with the Northeasterly margin of the City of Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way (formerly Puget Sound Electric Railway Right of Way); Thence North 49°24'00" West, along said Northeasterly margin 188.00 feet to the true point of beginning; Continuing thence North 49°24'00" West along said Northeasterly margin, 130.21 feet; Thence North 40°36'00" East, parallel to said 48th Avenue South, 24.00 feet; Thence South 49°24'00" East, parallel to said Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way, 130.21 feet; Thence South 40°36'00" West 24.00 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL D: A non-exclusive easement for access road and utility purposes over that portion of Stephen Foster Donation Land Claim No. 38 in the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of 48th Avenue South, granted by the City of Seattle to the State of Washington as provided by Ordinance Number 93708 of the City of Seattle and recorded under Auditor's File Number 6313596, in King County, Washington, with the Northeasterly margin of the City of Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way (formerly Puget Sound Electric Railway Right of Way); Thence North 49°24'00" West, along said Northeasterly margin 288.21 feet to the true point of beginning; Thence South 40°36'00" West, parallel to said 48th Avenue South, 100.00 feet to the Northeasterly margin of Interurban Avenue South; Thence North 49°24'00" West, along said Interurban Avenue South, 60.00 feet; Thence North 40°36'00" East, 100.00 feet to said Northeasterly margin of the Seattle Transmission Line Right of Way; Thence South 49°24'00" East, along said Northeasterly margin, 60.00 feet to the true point of beginning. (01490671.DOC;1 ) RECEIVED ti 13 2011TTY OF SEA TLE - CARY PERMITDEPARTMENT MP��C�OELOp trNT P.M. #230415-1-423 THf�AGREEMENT made by and between the CITY OF SEATTLE, CITY LIGHT DEPARTMENT, hereinafter called the "City" or "City Light", and PACWEST ENERGY, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 3450 E. Commercial Ct., Meridian, ID 83642, hereinafter called the "Permittee", for use of a portion of the City's fee -owned transmission line right of way in connection with a service station and convenience store described as follows: Approximately 14,625 square feet adjacent to 13138 Interurban Ave. S., Tukwila, WA 98618, consisting of 3,612 square feet for parking of motor vehicles, and the remainder for maintaining one 20 foot by 6'/2 foot business sign not exceeding 20 feet in height from• ground level and underground electrical line to service the sign and also landscaping, all within the lntenirban Transmission Line Right of Way being the southerly 162.5 feet thereof lying northwesterly of 48th Ave South and being a portion of the following described property: Portion of the City of Seattle's Transmission Line right-of-way in Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38 in the Northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. The permitted area is shown on the sketch "Attachment A" attached hereto and made a part of this permit agreement. This pennit cancels, supersedes and replaces that temporary permit under Seattle City Light P.M. #230415-1-407, granted on the 7th of February, 1979. Permitted uses under this temporary permit are subject to the following terms and conditions: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. The term of this permit shall begin on August 1, 2010. 2. The Permittee agrees to pay the following fees for the rights and privileges as above stated: a. The rental fee to be paid the City of Seattle for the temporary use of said property shall be THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN DOLLARS ($377.00) per month, payable in advance. b. A leasehold tax in the amount of 12.84 percent of the above fee, or at any revised rate as may be established by State law, payable in advance. 3. The rent shall be adjusted on each January 1st commencing January 1, 2011, by the annual percentage increase or decrease for the year ending the previous October 31, in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Seattle - Tacoma -Bremerton Metropolitan Area (e.g., if Permittee continues to rent the Premises, on January 1, 2011, the rent will increase by the percentage increase in the CPI-U, Seattle -Tacoma - Bremerton, during the one-year period ending October 31, 2010). 4. Permittee hereby agrees that, in case of an increase in rent or other fees, all other provisions of this pennit shall remain in full force, changed only by such alterations in amount of rent or other fees and not otherwise. Page 1 of 5 5. The Permittee shall pay all licenses, excise and taxes in connection with his business conducted on said premises; all taxes on Permittee's property on said premises; and all taxes on the Permittee's leasehold interest created by this temporary permit. 6. The Permittee agrees to assume all liability for any damage caused to the City's transmission line facilities arising out of or resulting from Permittee's use of the City's property. 7. The Permittee agrees that the City of Seattle shall not be liable for any damage to Permittee's property by reason of any construction, alterations, maintenance or improvements performed in said property by the City of Seattle, its agents or representatives. 8. The Permittee agrees not to use the property herein described for any other purpose whatsoever than as set forth above, and agrees that the Superintendent of Seattle City Light shall be the sole judge of any conflict or violation of such use as above stated. 9. The Permittee shall not at any time interfere with the City's access to and over said property. 10. Where this permit is issued for access, then it shall not be deemed or held to be an exclusive permit, or prohibit City Light from granting other permits of like or other nature, or interfere with the City's use of said property, or affect the City's jurisdiction over all or any part thereof.. 11. This permit is only for permission to use the City's land and shall not be construed to replace or to be used in lieu of any permits, licenses or consent which may be required, granted or regulated by any other agency or subdivision of government with authority to license, regulate or supervise the Permittee's operations or land use. 12. The Permittee agrees that use of the. permit area must be consistent with applicable zoning laws and regulations; where the proposed use is not consistent with said laws, said use is made conditional upon the Permittee obtaining conditional zoning or a zoning variance. 13. The Permittee agrees to maintain the premises occupied or used in an orderly, fit and sanitary condition, and at the expiration of the term of this permit, or upon an earlier termination thereof, to restore the property to as good condition or better than that which existed prior to issuance of this permit. The permittee agrees that regular maintenance of the grassy areas by mowing shall be its responsibility. 14. No building or structure shall be constructed or placed upon the City's property. 15. No paving, grading, cut or fill operation, or excavation of any kind shall be conducted on the City's property without the express written approval of the Superintendent of City Light, or his representative. 16. The permittee agree to submit plans furnishing details of any blacktopping, grading, cuts, or fills for the approval by the Superintendent of City Light, or his representatives, prior to the undertaking of any such blacktopping, grading, cut or fill operation on the herein described property. 17. No ponds, ditches or open water retention facilities of any kind shall be constructed or created on the City's property. 18. The Permittee agrees not to allow vehicles or other equipment within five (5) feet of any pole or within ten (10) feet of any tower. Permittee further agrees not to place any material or objects whatsoever against any transmission line pole or tower. 19. Permittee agrees to install and maintain protection such as guard posts and/or curbing for the protection of electrical transmission line poles/tower or shall protect the poles/tower located on said property in a manner approved by the Superintendent of City Light or his/her representative. Page 2 of 5 20. The City reserves the right to require the Permittee to place signs or other warning devices of hazards as any governmental agency or City Light determines such hazards to exist. 21. The Permittee agrees to comply with all Federal, State and local electrical safety laws and regulations. 22. There shall be no parking under the transmission line tower. 23. Plantings will be limited to and maintained to a height below twelve (12) feet. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE PROVISIONS 24. The Permittee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Seattle from all claims, actions or damages of every kind and description, including all claims, actions or damages brought by Permittee's employees, contractors, agents, representatives or tenants, which may accrue from or be suffered by reason of Permittee's use of the City's property, or the performance of any work in connection with such use. In case of any suit or action brought against the City arising out of or by reason of any of the above causes, the Permittee shall, upon notice to Permittee of the commencement of such action, defend the same at no cost or expense to the City, and Permittee will fully satisfy any judgment rendered in said action adversely to the City. Permittee's obligations under this Section 24 shall not, however, apply to the extent of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City of Seattle, its agents or representatives. By this indemnity provision, the Permittee expressly waives any immunity he or his businesses may have from claims by his or his businesses' employees under any workers' compensation or industrial insurance law arising out of workplace injuries, as defined under RCW 51.24.030, in connection with Permittee's use of the City's property. Said express waiver was mutually negotiated between the City and the Permittee. 25. The Permittee assumes responsibility for all potential risks, actions or damages related to exposure to EMF, and/or radio frequency radiation, connected with the Permittee's use of the City's property. The indemnity and hold harmless provisions of this agreement apply to all claims, actions or damages related to EMF, and/or radio frequency radiation, in the same manner and to the same extent as they apply to all claims, actions or damages of every other kind and description. 26. The Permittee shall obtain and•maintain continuously for the term of this permit, at no expense to the City, an occurrence form Commercial General Liability policy, insuring against personal injury, death, loss or damage of any kind arising or resulting from the use of the property by the Permittee. Minimum limit of coverage shall be ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) each occurrence. Such insurance shall be endorsed to include the City of Seattle as additional insured, and shall not be reduced or canceled without giving forty-five (45) days prior written notice to the City. Such insurance shall include a provision (whether by endorsement or otherwise) indicating that, except with respect to the limits of insurance and any rights or duties specifically assigned to the first named insured, such insurance shall apply (a) as if each party insured thereunder (whether as named insured or additional insured) were the only party insured by such policy, and (b) separately to each party that is insured thereunder and against whom a claim is made or suit is brought. The Permittee shall provide the City a duplicate photocopy of the insurance policy with its endorsements as evidence of coverage. The policy shall be subject to the approval of the City as to carrier, form, coverage and limits. The City will reject any policy written by a carrier not admitted and licensed to conduct business in the State of Washington unless the policy has been filed in compliance with RCW 48.15 (Unauthorized Insurers). Failure to maintain required insurance shall be considered a material breach of contract, subject to the remedies laid out in Paragraph 32 below. Page 3 of 5 27. The Superintendent of City Light, or his representatives, shall have the right at all times to inspect said premises for the purpose of observing the conditions thereof, and the manner of compliance by the Permittee with the terms and conditions of this permit. 28. The Superintendent of City Light shall have the right at all times to suspend any or all operations on the above property which he deems to be detrimental to the best interest of the City of Seattle. 29. Permittee covenants and agrees that neither he, nor his employees, contractors or agents, will store, dump, bury or transfer any hazardous substances, flammable materials, inoperable vehicles, chemicals, oils, fuels, or containers for said substances, chemicals, oils, fuels, etc., on the premises; and further agrees to observe all Federal, State and local environmental laws and regulations. PERMIT TERMINATION OR CANCELLATION 30. This permit is subject to cancellation at any time upon 90 days written notice by City Light, mailed to Permittee's last known address, and the return of unearned, prepaid rental, if any. 31. Permittee understands and agrees that Permittee's status under this permit is only that of temporary tenant, with term of tenancy limited by the terms of this permit and the City's need for the subject property; that cancellation or non -renewal of this permit for any reason whatsoever shall not place any obligation on the City to provide Permittee any alternative rental property or facilities. This permit vests no permanent property rights in the Permittee and cancellation or non -renewal thereof does not render Permittee a "displaced person" as defined under RCW 8.26.020 or Chapter 20.84 Seattle Municipal Code. 32. Should the Permittee violate, breach or fail to keep or perform any covenant, agreement, term or condition of this permit, Permittee shall forfeit any and all rights herein permitted, and the City shall have the right to immediately cancel and terminate said permit and all of the Permittee's rights hereunder without liability for loss or damage that the Permittee may thereby sustain; and upon termination of this permit, the Permittee will vacate said premises and remove his personal property therefrom. 33, The Permittee shall remove all his personal property from said premises on or before the termination date of this permit. If Permittee shall fail to remove such personal property on or before the termination date of this permit, the same shall, at the City's option, become a part of the realty and the property of the City of Seattle; or the City may, at its election, remove the same without liability to the Permittee for loss, injury or damage thereto, and the cost of such removal and restoration of said premises to their former condition shall be paid by the Permittee to the City upon demand. 34. All of the licensing, permitting, tax and other legal requirements or obligations incurred by the Permittee hereunder shall survive the cancellation or termination date of this permit. 35. All of the indemnification and hold harmless provisions, as well as the hazardous substance covenant, of this permit shall survive the cancellation or termination date hereof. 36. This permit is not transferable or assignable, in whole or in part, nor may any portion of the rented premises be sublet, without the express written approval of the Superintendent of City Light, or his representative. Paee 4 of 5 GRANTED this day of n , . ACCEPTED: JACKSO 00 ► STORF,S IIC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, ITS MANAGER By: JOD:JACKSON, Chief Executive Officer APPROVED: SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ddmi. DAVE BARBER, Manager Real Estate Services Page 5 of 5 Attachment A Pacwest Energy, LLC 13138 Interurban Avenue S eitg aL J u&ui&a Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: _Teri x Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: ...was mai led to each of the addresses listed/attached. on this 6th day of _June in the year 2011 Project Name: Jacksons Food Store, Administrative Design Review Project Number: PL1O-057 Associated File Number (s): L11-029 Mailing requested by: Moira Bradshaw Mailer's signature: / /i J heat W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION Barghausen Consulting Engineers, representing the owner of Jacksons Food Store, proposes the demolition and expansion of the existing 1,185 square foot Shell Station at 13138 Interurban Avenue S. The proposed expansion and renovation includes new gas pump canopy, signs, lighting, landscaping, a 1,056 square foot learning center and 2,706 square foot food market. Projects applied for include: L11-029, Administrative Design Review Other known required permits include: None at this time Studies required with the applications include: None. This project is exempt from State Environmental Policy Act review per WAC 197-11- 800(17), Information Collection and Research. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., June 20, 2011. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Moira Carr Bradshaw at (206) 431-3651, Moira.bradshaw@tukwilawa.gov or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: April 22, 2011 Notice of Completeness Issued: June 1, 2011 Notice of Application Issued: June 6, 2011 H:\Jackson\APPNOTE.DOC z City of Tukwila GI Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188-2599 fie, OSI-A,IA, ILL 34'5V t 1'pria � � � 61. ilAtia ni sre5 oz")_, t.,cpaiuitcitt vJ vvnuitcc, ctcy Ycrctvytitcict 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188-2599 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY DIVISION PO BOX 34023 SEATTLE, WA 98124-4023 sz City of Tukwila o Department of Community Development PI 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188-2599 KEN STONER Q4EST COMMUNICATIONS 23315 66TH AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division ( ) Dept of Ecology, SEPA ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( ) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library QWEST Communications Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) City Clerk ( ) Building ( ) Mayor Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayo Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Directo NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION May 28, 2011 Ms. Caryl Mattson Barghausen Consulting Engineers 18215 72 Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032 Subject: Jacksons Food Store No. 631 13138 Interurban Ave S L11-029 Administrative Design Review Dear Ms. Mattson: Your application for administrative design review is considered complete on May 28, 2011 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 431-3651. Sincerely, AdvileAttr Moira Carr Bradshaw Senior Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 April 22, 2011 HAND DELIVERED Brenda Holt Permit Coordinator City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Administrative Design Review City of Tukwila File Nos. PL10-057, PRE10-012, and L10-070 13138 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington Jacksons Food Store No. 631 / Our Job No. 14700 Dear Brenda, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING IFS F""-'5 tat t [APR 2 2 20111 COMMUNITY DEVELoPt EUT On behalf of Jacksons Food Stores, Inc., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. has prepared the attached package for your review and approval. We are submitting the following documents per document entitled "Administrative Design Review" at the direction and assistance of Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor: • One (1) Letter of Authorization from Jason O'Very of Jacksons Food Stores • One (1) completed Application Checklist • One (1) completed Application Form and, • Five (5) copies of each plan sheet prepared; site luminary plan included • One (1) set of all plans reduced to 11- by 17-inch • One (1) check payable to City of Tukwila in the amount of $1,950.00 • One (1) completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property • One (1) written discussion of project consistency titled "Justification Statement" prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Two (2) copies of the Geotechnical Report • One (1) 11- by 17-inch color and materials plan sheet • One (1) 11- by 17-inch color rendering 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • OLYMPIA, WA • CONCORD, CA • TEMECULA, CA www.barghausen.com Brenda Holt Permit Coordinator City of Tukwila -2- April 22, 2011 We look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel to contact me with any questions at 425.656.1063 or email cmattson(a�barghausen.com. Sincerely, � l CaryNJ. Mattson Design Engineer CJM/dm 14700c.001.doc enc: As noted cc: Jack Davis, Jacksons Food Stores via email Jason O'Very, Jacksons Food Stores via email Jay Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Dan Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. Mark Peterson, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. ptiNNI ri) • APR22 20111 COMMUNITY DEVELOPraNT January 3, 2011 Subject: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., Predevelopment and Entitlements representative for the Jacksons Food Stores Oregon and Washington To Whom It May Concern: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc located at 18215 72nd Ave South Kent, WA 98032 has been retained by Jacksons Food Stores (and PacWest Energy, LLC dba Jacksons Food Stores) as a consultant and representative for the purpose of designing, and obtaining all necessary permits for reimaging, remodeling, and construction of our convenience stores and fueling centers in the states of Oregon and Washington for calendar year 2011. Their employees and agents are authorized to conduct meetings, submit applications, and process related documents and submittals necessary to facilitate this process. If you have any questions, concerns, or you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at the phone number listed below. Best Regards, J eV''.----- son O'Very VP of Store Development Jacksons Food Stores 3450 E. Commercial Court Meridian, ID 83642 jason.overy@jacksonsfoodstores.com Direct: 208.888.9870 Cell: 208.695.8787 345C EAST COMMERCIAL COURT RT • MERIT IA. J. ,U.'\HC s36'2 • t_ 8i 888-3oe" • FA/. '7 3 383-3585 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us AIONIINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW1011L`t r. .to".--' APPLICATION FLI0?5?- %0 v/° ,�"�� o FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P-DR Planner: \ File Number: (_ ( t.- 0 a9 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: p2i10 - Di! o - Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Pke--K I)S i d Slue /16), (, 31 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1 '51-B 1 n-‘-eikell rbeie1 @ 0.}(7)5s & .e* 4)2)4`-, Ave, amid-k LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 041aoar7coct DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name CAP'(I•\ f i So , be,516 EI`961 960 32 Address: 15Gl-%4.AEem N SU U (t EKGI NEES, 1 &`L CJ 9 l4 1 S Phone: 425 -1056, — Olga FAX: 4 26 - 26 I 8782__ E-mail: C114C6--�' Son@ b tqa.Art.', e.ArN. Lpvv� Signature: 61�i�„c `"� Date: Q. 1 , at) II P:\ Planning Forms \ Applications \AdminBAR-6-06.doc November 30, 2006 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Pke--K I)S i d Slue /16), (, 31 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1 '51-B 1 n-‘-eikell rbeie1 @ 0.}(7)5s & .e* 4)2)4`-, Ave, amid-k LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 041aoar7coct DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name CAP'(I•\ f i So , be,516 EI`961 960 32 Address: 15Gl-%4.AEem N SU U (t EKGI NEES, 1 &`L CJ 9 l4 1 S Phone: 425 -1056, — Olga FAX: 4 26 - 26 I 8782__ E-mail: C114C6--�' Son@ b tqa.Art.', e.ArN. Lpvv� Signature: 61�i�„c `"� Date: Q. 1 , at) II P:\ Planning Forms \ Applications \AdminBAR-6-06.doc November 30, 2006 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: „/ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. ✓ 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). ✓ 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17". 1/ 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. ✓ 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 7. If the project requires SEPA review: Payment of a $365 notice board fee to Fast Signs Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). Mailed notice is not required. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 8. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). 9. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. a/ 10. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application) ✓ 11. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/dcdplan.htm) for additional information. SITE PLAN: ✓ 12 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". V (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. ✓ (c) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. P:\Forms\2009 Applications\Design Review-Administrative-JAN09.doc Check items submitted with application Information I. _aired. May be, waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning ✓ (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. ,v4 (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. ,�,'/1- 1 (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: ✓ 16. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. Maximum size 24" x 36". 1 17. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. 18. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is suggested. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). ✓ 19. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting if any changes to the existing fixtures are proposed. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot- candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. P:\Planning Forms\Applications\2007 Applications \ AdminBAR-12-07.doc 2008 January 23, CITY g, TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan@ci. tkwila. wa. us DMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW Piloo INFORMATION City of Tukwila design review combines specific standards, design criteria and illustrative design guidelines to require that all developments reflect a high level of design quality. Tukwila has two design review processes, one for projects that require a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review and one for smaller projects that are approved administratively by the DCD Director. This application packet is for administrative design review. REQUIREMENTS: Administrative approval is required for the following types of development: Q New Development or Redevelopment beyond the Existing Exterior Walls 1. Multi -family or hotel/motel building additions up to 1,500 s.f.. 2. All commercial and industrial development in various zones, when up to a certain size as follows: • MUO, 0 and RCM zoned buildings between 1,500 and 5,000 s.f. • In the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor RC zoned structures up to 1,500 s.f., outside of the TIB corridor RC zoned structures between 1,500 and 5,000 s.f. • . TUC zoned buildings between 1,500 and 2,500 s.f except those with multi -family units • NCC and RCC zoned developments up to 1.500 s.f. • C/LI and TVS zoned buildings between 1,500 and 10,000 s.f. All development in LI, HI, MIC/L, MIC/H and TVS located within 300' of a residential zone. 4. All development in LI, HI, MIC/L, MIC/H and TVS located within 200 feet of the Green River. Exterior Repair, Reconstruction, Cosmetic Alterations or Improvements 1. Any exterior repairs, alterations or improvements, if the cost of that work is between 10 and 25% of the building's assessed value: • in the MUO, 0, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC and C/LI districts, for sites with more than 10,000 g.s.f. of building area and • all sites in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor zoned NCC, MUO or RC. 2 Developments with a previous approved design may make minor changes with Department approval. All other changes require new design review. C.Proposed Development Standard Waivers The DCD Director may reduce landscape and building setbacks for Projects in the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor, in the MUO, NCC, and RC zones. PROCEDURES: At the time you submit your application you must have all' -of the items listed on the attached "Complete Application Checklist." You may request a waiver from items on the checklist that are not applicable to your project. Please discuss this waiver request with City staff either at a pre -application meeting or at the time of application submittal. Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff will determine if it is complete based on the attached checklist. If not complete City staff will mail you a letter outlining what additional information is needed. If you do not submit requested materials within 90 days from the City's request for additional information the City may cancel your application. Staff will meet with you as needed, to help achieve project goals, and formulate a recommendation to the Director. Once all design issues have been resolved we will issue a Notice of Decision. This approval will expire unless construction begins within three years of the decision. , P:\Planning Forms \ Applications \AdminBAR-12-06.doc December 11, 2006 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of- Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON 0 ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its em to ees, agents, engineers, contraactlojs or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at J3/, /ArTFRL/ $im/ AV S. 7j,{KAI/ / w for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. "' St 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any Loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. Pt EXECUTED at KQevt (city), v./(state), on (c-4- I 1 20 1 0 . .Acic S (Print Name) : 9/S3q tV..J�.anie 1.��'�S _SI P-RsL.st; 7 (Address Sao—s g.9 6 (Phe Numb) gnature) On this day personally appeared before me •� K D tt\/1S to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge at he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS lit'G•( L, Sc t��• , � o.� NOTin <• UlV ,i, :, residingat - NOT AAA �tct :My Commission expires on PUBL\C ' z Op WASO, 10I►� I 1+I" DAY OF Oe_Ta bet- , 20 l 0 tate of Washington IA/ l4 P:\Planning Forms\Applications\AdminBAR-6-06.doc November 30, 2006 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons aka PacWest Energy, LLC 3450 East Commercial Court Meridian, Idaho 83642 Attention: Jack Davis 13256 Northeast20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561 November 22, 2010 JN 10291 via email: jackdavis@jacksons-foodstores.com Subject: Transmittal Letter — Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Reconstruction of Convenience Store 13138 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila Store #631 Tukwila, Washington Dear Ms. Mattson: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed reconstruction of the existing convenience store in Tukwila. The scope of our services consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design considerations for foundations and seismic criteria. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-8051, dated November 4, 2010. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or for further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. cc: Barghausen Consulting — Caryl Mattson via email Collons + Smith — Bryan Collons via email MRM: jyb Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal t._ 6.0 u . 'APR 22 2011 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. t11EVELGI:'.�.-- GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Reconstruction of Convenience Store 13138 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the proposed reconstruction of the existing convenience store in Tukwila. We were provided with a Preliminary Site Plan developed by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 29, 2010. We have also reviewed a Land Title Survey created by Terramark and dated February 11, 2009. Based on these plans and conversations with the design team, we understand that the project will consist of removal of the existing convenience store and car wash structure, and construction of a new, slightly larger convenience store with an attached employee training center. The existing gasoline fueling system and canopy would remain undisturbed. The new building is to be constructed near the elevation of the current building. Therefore, no significant cuts or fills are expected, other than the excavations for the new foundation system. The proposed building will be slightly larger than the existing structure, extending further toward the north than the current structure does. If the scope of the project changes from what we have described above, we should be provided with revised plans in order to determine if modifications to the recommendations and conclusions of this report are warranted. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The property is situated on the northeast corner of Interurban Avenue South and 48th Avenue South. Interstate 5 crosses over Interurban Avenue South approximately one block to the south of the site. Development in the general area consists of primarily of retail and commercial businesses. The current structure is located on the eastern side of the property, and consists of a one-story building containing a convenience store and an unused car wash. This building has a slab -on - grade floor and appears to be generally of steel frame construction. The area around the existing structure ismostly asphalt pavement. Pavement, and the existing canopy and fueling pumps are located to the west of the current structure. The ground surface over the site is generally level, with minor sloping of the parking lots. There are no steep slopes on, or near, the subject property. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling one test boring at the approximate location shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The boring was drilled on November 10, 2010 using a truck -mounted, hollow -stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split -spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 JN 10291 Page 2 engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test boring, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Log is attached as Plate 3. As a part of our work, we also reviewed borings conducted previously by Converse Consultants NW near the site in 1992 for a municipal project completed on Interurban Avenue South. Soil Conditions The site lies in a low valley that the Duwamish River has flowed through since the glaciers last receded from the Puget Sound. The native soils revealed in our exploration consisted of loose, unconsolidated silts over loose to medium dense sands. These soils are likely alluvium deposited by water that has flowed through the valley. The upper layer of soil was silt containing small organics and thin lenses of organics. Below a depth of 12 feet, the boring revealed loose to medium -dense sand and gravel extending to the bottom of the 39- foot exploration. These conditions were similar to those encountered during the previous investigation we reviewed, as well as explorations conducted by our firm elsewhere in this river valley. A boring drilled in 1992 just to the west of the southwestern corner of the site found bedrock below the alluvium at a depth of approximately 25 feet. No obstructions were revealed by our explorations. However, debris, buried utilities, and old foundation and slab elements are commonly encountered on sites that have had previous development. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was observed in the boring below a depth of about 5 feet. This seepage likely represents the approximate level of the local water table. The test boring was left open for only a short time period and was conducted in fall, before the onset of frequent heavy rains. Therefore, the seepage level encountered in the boring represents the location of transient water seepage and may not exactly match the static groundwater level. Groundwater levels encountered during drilling can be deceptive, because seepage into the boring can also be blocked or slowed by the auger itself. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. We expect that the water table may rise closer to the ground surface during the winter and spring wit ongoing precipitation. The stratification lines on the log represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration location. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary away from the exploration location. The log provides specific subsurface information only at the location tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring log are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL JN 10291 Page 3 THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY. MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY RELYING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. The test boring conducted for this study encountered loose alluvial silts and sands, and this is consistent with the conditions found previously in nearby explorations. The upper silt is moderately compressible, and the loose sand below the water table may undergo at least localized liquefaction (loss of bearing strength) during an earthquake. Even in these conditions, construction of a lightly - loaded retail building should be possible using shallow foundations. We recommend that the structure be carried on heavily -reinforced continuous footings that would be designed and constructed to reduce differential settlement under both static and seismic loading. The foundation system should also be underlain by a mat of compacted rock fill covering the entire building footprint. All of the following elements should be incorporated into design and construction of the foundation system: • Support the structure on a gridwork of heavily -reinforced continuous footings spaced no further apart than 15 feet in each direction. • Design the continuous foundations similar to grade beams, being theoretically able to span a minimum distance of 10 feet without soil support. This can be accomplished using a conventional footing and stem wall system with three pieces of rebar in the footing, and both vertical and horizontal rebar in the stem wall. • Bear the perimeter foundations at least 18 inches below the existing grade. • Excavate the entire building footprint to at least 3.5 feet below the existing grade and place no Tess than 2 feet of compacted rock fill (quarry spalls or railroad ballast rock) beneath all footings. Settlement -tolerant building construction, such as wood and metal framing and siding should be used. Masonry, stucco, tile and other settlement -sensitive materials should be avoided wherever possible. A reinforced slab -on -grade floor can be used inside the structure. Rebar should be used to reinforce the slab, in order to reduce the potential for large cracks and downsets if differential settlement occurs. If possible, the finish elevations inside and around the building should be close to the existing grade. Placing additional fill above the current ground elevations could cause additional post - construction consolidation of the underlying soils. If the slab must be above the existing grade, then lightweight fill such as geofoam should be used for structural fill above the bottom of the new footings. Also, utilities entering and exiting the building foundation should be designed using flexible connections and be backfilled with an open -graded rock, such as pea gravel, to allow for some differential settlement. The on -site soils are highly sensitive to moisture. The excavated soils will not be suitable for reuse as structural fill under the building or pavement areas. All structural fill will have to be imported. This will likely include backfill for new utility trenches, as attempting to recompact the wet, silty soils in utility trenches typically results in excessive post -construction ground settlement. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 JN 10291 Page 4 The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the weather conditions that are encountered. The existing pavement should be maintained wherever possible to provide cover for the underlying soil. Upon completion of demolition of the existing building and foundations it may be necessary to cover exposed soil with gravel, plastic, or mulch until the new foundation excavation is undertaken. Trucks should be kept on the existing pavement to reduce the risk of tracking soil and mud off the site. Any soil spilled on the paved areas should be immediately cleaned up. It may be necessary to install premanufactured silt socks in existing storm catch basins. At least the first layer of rock fill should be placed on the exposed soil as soon as the recommended overexcavation is completed. This reduces the potential for generating silty water in the excavation. If silty water accumulates, it cannot be discharged to the storm sewer system, and may have to be temporarily stored in a holding tank until it can be properly disposed of. As with any site, additional erosion control measures may be necessary, depending on the site and weather conditions encountered during the actual grading and construction. The drainage and/or waterproofing recommendations presented in this report are intended only to prevent active seepage from flowing through concrete walls or slabs. Even in the absence of active seepage into and beneath structures, water vapor can migrate through walls, slabs, and floors from the surrounding soil, and can even be transmitted from slabs and foundation walls due to the concrete curing process. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. As with any project that involves demolition of existing site buildings and/or excavation, there is a potential risk of movement on surrounding properties. This can potentially translate into noticeable damage of surrounding on -grade elements, such as foundations and slabs. However, the site work could just translate into perceived damage on adjacent properties. Unfortunately, it is becoming more and more common for adjacent property owners to make unsubstantiated damage claims on new projects that occur close to their developed Tots. Therefore, we recommend making an extensive photographic and visual survey of the project vicinity, prior to demolition activities and/or commencing with the excavation. This documents the condition of buildings, pavements, and utilities in the immediate vicinity of the site in order to avoid, and protect the owner from, unsubstantiated damage claims by surrounding property owners. Additionally, any adjacent structures or settlement -sensitive utilities should be monitored during construction to detect soil movements. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and recommendations. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS In accordance with Table 1613.5.2 of the 2006 International Building Code (IBC), the site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Site Class Type E (Soft Site Class). As noted in the USGS website, the mapped spectral acceleration value for a 0.2 second (Ss) and 1.0 second period (Si) equals 1.47g and 0.51g, respectively. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 JN 10291 Page 5 The loose soils that underlie the water table are potentially susceptible to seismic liquefaction in a large earthquake. The foundation recommendations presented in this report are intended to prevent catastrophic foundation failure in the event of the IBC -design earthquake, protecting the safety of occupants. Even so, significant settlement and structural damage should be expected in a large earthquake. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS The General section presents detailed recommendations for design of the foundation system. We recommend that all footings be continuous and have a minimum width of 16 inches. Exterior footings should also be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for protection against frost and erosion. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. An allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings constructed as recommended in this report. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic Toads. We estimate that the total post - construction of the foundations will be on the order of 2 inches, with differential settlements of less than one inch in 50 feet along a continuous footing. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: PARAMETER Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure ULTIMATE VALUE 0.40 300 pcf Where: (i) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend maintaining. a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above ultimate values. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS JN 10291 Page 6 Substantial retaining walls are not expected for this project. However, walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: PARAMETER Active Earth Pressure * VALUE 45 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where: (i) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii) active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. * For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design only permanent foundation and retaining walls that are to be backfilled., such as conventional walls constructed of reinforced concrete or masonry. It is not appropriate to use the above earth pressures and soil unit weight to back -calculate soil strength parameters for design of other types of retaining walls, such as soldier pile, reinforced earth, modular or soil nail walls. We can assist with design of these types of walls, if desired. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. The values for friction and passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners or bends in the walls. This is intended to reduce the amount of cracking that can occur where a wall is restrained by a corner. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Wall Pressures Due to Seismic Forces The surcharge wall loads that could be imposed by the design earthquake can be modeled by adding a uniform lateral pressure to the above -recommended active pressure. The recommended surcharge pressure is 8H pounds per square foot (psf), where H is the GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 JN 10291 Page 7 design retention height of the wall. Using this increased pressure, the safety factor against sliding and overturning can be reduced to 1.2 for the seismic analysis. Retaining Wall Backfill and Waterproofing The native soils are not suitable to be used as backfill. Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. It is critical that the wall backfill be placed in lifts and be properly compacted, in order for the above -recommended design earth pressures to be appropriate. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well -compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. The section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains additional recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof below -grade walls, or to prevent the formation of mold, mildew or fungi in interior spaces. Over time, the performance of subsurface drainage systems can degrade, subsurface groundwater flow patterns can change, and utilities can break or develop Teaks. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where future seepage through the walls is not acceptable. This typically includes limiting cold -joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. There are a variety of different waterproofing materials and systems, which should be installed by an experienced contractor familiar with the anticipated construction and subsurface conditions. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion to the outside face of a wall is not considered waterproofing, and will only help to reduce moisture generated from water vapor or capillary action from seeping through the concrete. As with any project, adequate ventilation of basement and crawl space areas is important to prevent a build up of water vapor that is commonly transmitted through concrete walls from the surrounding soil, even when seepage is not present. This is appropriate even when waterproofing is applied to the outside of foundation and retaining walls. We recommend that you contact a specialty consultant if detailed recommendations or specifications related to waterproofing design, or minimizing the potential for infestations of mold and mildew are desired. SLAB FLOORS Even where the exposed soils appear dry, water vapor will tend to naturally migrate upward through the soil to the new constructed space above it. This can affect moisture -sensitive flooring, cause GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 JN 10291 Page 8 imperfections or damage to the slab, or simply allow excessive water vapor into the space above the slab. All interior slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of gravel or crushed rock that has a fines content (percent passing the No. 200 sieve) of less than 3 percent and a sand content (percent passing the No. 4 sieve) of no more than 10 percent. As noted by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab Structures, proper moisture protection is desirable immediately below any on -grade slab that will be covered by tile, wood, carpet, impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture -sensitive equipment or products. ACl also notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil plastic sheeting, have been used in the past, but are now recommending a minimum 10-mil thickness. A vapor retarder is defined as a material with a permeance of less than 0.3 perms, as determined by ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this specification, although the manufacturers of the admixtures should be consulted. Where vapor retarders are used under slabs, their edges should overlap by at least 6 inches and be sealed with adhesive tape. The sheeting should extend to the foundation walls for maximum vapor protection. If no potential for vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor barrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission rate of 0.01 perms when tested in accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can meet this requirement. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Foundation drains should be used where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth -retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non -woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 4. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. As a minimum, a vapor retarder, as defined in the Slabs -On -Grade section, should be provided in any crawl space area to limit the transmission of water vapor from the underlying soils. Also, an outlet drain is recommended for all crawl spaces to prevent a build up of any water that may bypass the footing drains. Final site grading in areas adjacent to the building should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Surface drains should be provided where necessary to prevent ponding of water behind foundation or retaining walls. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. It is important that existing foundation be removed before site development. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 JN 10291 Page 9 Structural fill is defined as any fill, including utility backfill, placed under, or close to, a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. As discussed in the General section, the on -site soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill, due to moisture and organic content. The allowable thickness of the fill lift, will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not sufficiently compacted, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: LOCATION OF FILL MINIMUM RELATIVE PLACEMENT Beneath slabs or walkwa s Filled slopes and behind retaining walls Beneath pavements COMPACTION 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557.91 (Modified Proctor). LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test boring are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in the test boring. Subsurface conditions can also vary away from exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Jack Davis and Jacksons, and their representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Jacksons November 22, 2010 JN 10291 Page 10 techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Our services also do not include assessing or minimizing the potential for biological hazards, such as mold, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site development. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. During the construction phase, we will provide geotechnical observation and testing services when requested by you or your representatives. Please be aware that we can only document site work we actually observe. It is still the responsibility of your contractor or on -site construction team to verify that our recommendations are being followed, whether we are present at the site or not. The scope of our work did not include an environmental assessment, but we can provide this service, if requested. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plate 3 Boring Log Plate 4 Typical Footing Drain Detail We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. MRM: jyb Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. ), :L Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. ;andlai i su. • Ilers. {1 Ian! htsreserve VICINITY MAP 13138 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Date: Nov. 2010 Scale: Not to Scale sour tatvoyat9 54 If ' MON *IMAM Fig,65* 4610 AtIONOVO SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 13138 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Job 10291 Date: Nov. 2010 Scale: Not to Scale Plate: 2 BORING 1 Description 4" of asphalt over Light gray to gray SILT with organics, damp, loose becomes moist to wet thin organic layer Black SAND, medium grained, wet, loose -becomes medium dense -becomes fine grained, loose -gravel Tens Slightly silty GRAVEL, wet, medium -dense * Test boring was terminated at 39 feet on November 10, 2010. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 5 feet during drilling. BORING LOG 13138 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Job Date: Logged by: Plate: 10291 Nov.2010 JLH 3 Slope backfill away from foundation. Provide surface drains where necessary. Backfill (See text for requirements) Nonwoven Geotextile Filter Fabric 6" min. Tightline Roof Drain (Do not connect to footing drain) 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (Invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) NOTES: (1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Vapor Retarder or Barrier Free -Draining Gravel (if appropriate) prevent buildup of water that and waterproofing considerations. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 13138 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Job 1 Date: 10291 Nov. 2010 Scale: Not to Scale Plate: 4 r-20' ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN REPLACE LOT LIGHT POLE & FOOTING 0i� EXISTING CATCH BASIN NEW LANDSCAPING WALL MOUNTED UGHTING, TYPICAL OF 7 RELOCATE VENT RISER w/ SUPPORT LEARNING CENTER ENTRY DOOR REDBOX OVD RENTAL LOCATION TBD 5' REQUIRED LANDSCAPE O SIDE YARD J \ \ EXISTING I.D. SIGN w/ • EASEMENT FROM CITY OF SEATTLE—CITY LIGHT DEPARTMENT f S 1T/LL -4'c 0 ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE WALL EXISTING RETAINING CURB TO REMAIN ALONG NORTHEAST PROPERTY UNE; NEW EGRESS WALK WILL BE FLUSH WITH TOP NEW PROPOSED SPRINKLER MINI -MARKET R15ER ROOM (170r0 PROPANE OCCUPANCY EXCHANGE TYPE V-B PROGRAM ICE MERCHDBLO.COOE WALL PRPSIGNS EXISTING POWER POLE © VICINITY MAP EXISTING VENT RISERS WILL BE RELOCATED EMERGENCY EXIT DEMOUSH EXISTING STRUCTURE NEW ELECTRICAL ROOM REMOVE OLD SIGN FOUNDATION TO GRADE REMOVE RV DUMP STATION NEW 13'-4'X10'X8' HIGH CONCRETE MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE w/(2) 6' HIGH GATES REMOVE OIL WATER SEPAHAIOR EXISTING HI —RISE I.D. S REMOVE EXISTING HORIZONTAL PROP TANK AND APPU" NANCES N LANDSCAPING NEW LOT LIGHT, POLE & FOOTING EXISTING OIL WATER SEPARATOR & BASIN TO REMAIN Lh 0' 7 MODIFY EXISTING PLANTER AREA PROPOSED TRUCK .<0 UNLOAD AREA; 10'X30' REPLACE EXISTING CANOPY w/ NEW INCLUDING NEW FOOTINGS; REMOVE & REINSTALL. DISPENSERS O GRADE w/GUARD POSTS PER SECTION 312, 2009 IFC; SALVAGE DRIVE SLABS NEW LOT UGHT, POLE & FOOTING MODIFIED LANDSCAPE; REQUIRED EXISTING MONITOR WELL TO REMAIN, TYPICAL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATION WALK—IN COOLER/FREEZER (STORAGE): 526SF/300 = 1.75 OR 2 BACKROOM, UTILITY/ELECT AREA (STORAGE): 1825E/300 = 0.61 OR 1 Sel FS AREA (MERCANTILE ON GRADE): 1,613SF/30 = 53.8 OR 54 OFFICE (BUSINESS): 605E/100 = 0.60 OR 1 LEARNING CENTER (EDUCATIONAL) = 9175F/50net = 18 TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD: 79 PARKING CALCULATION PER PARKING DETERMINATION FILE (L PL10-057, PRE10-012 C—STORE: FIRST 2200gsf PROVIDE 2 STALLS 2706gsf — 2200gsf - 506gsf/ 300 =1.7 USE 2 STALLS LEARNING CENTER: PROVIDE 11 STALLS TOTAL FOR BUILDING REQUIRED: 15 STALLS RE —FUELING CANOPY: 1 STALL/ RE—FUEUNG BAY PROVIDE 8 STALLS TOTAL SITE PARKING REQUIRED: 23 STALLS TOTAL PARKING EXISTING/PROPOSED: 30 STALLS Shell 3 8 3 co Lu z CCCOms S g CC p 0 8 cc z a. SITE DATA ADDRESS: 502—A 37th AVENUE SE PUYWEINGTO OWNER; PacWestALLUP, PEN, WE N LLC 3450 E. COMMERCIAL CT. MERIDIAN, ID 83642 CONTACT: JACK DAVIS, 208.888.3585; EMAIL: jock.davisOjocksonsfoodstores.00m SITE AREA: 24,450SF OR 0.56 ACRES APN: 0419037009 ZONING: C/U— COMMERCLAL/UGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AREA 1,185GSF EXISTING MINI —MARKET 1,478GSF EXISTING CANOPY OVER 4 MPD's 434GSF ADDISON FOR MINI —MARKET 1,035GSF ADDITION FOR LEARNING CENTER 2,120GSF NEW CANOPY OVER 4 MPD's CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-8 SPRINKLERED (STORE) OCCUPANCY: M (STORE AND GAS); B (LEARNING CENTER) SCOPE OF WORK • DEMOLISH EXISTING MINI -MARKET AND CAR WASH STRUCTURE. • CONSTRUCT NEW MINI —MARKET WITH LEARNING CENTER FOR THE TRAINING OF JACKSONS' EMPLOYEES/MANAGERS. • REPLACE CANOPY OVER REFUELING AREA; REMOVE & REINSTALL (4) REFUELING DISPENSERS 0 U 0 o 0 0 Y APPLICABLE CODES 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2009 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE 2009 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 2009 INTERNATIONAL ARE CODE 2009 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2009 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE 2003 ICC/ANSI A1117.1-2003 WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS AND PUBUSHED CODE ADOPTED CODES OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WA CONSULTANTS ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. 18205 72ND AVENUE S. KENT, WA 98032 CONTACTS: CARYL J. MATTSON (425).656-1063 MARK PETERSON (425) 656-7475 PLUMBING/MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL ABOSSEIN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2100 112th AVE. NE. SUITE 201 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 CONTACT: GARY WOMACK - PROJECT MANAGER 425-462-9441 e/t 1006 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 NE 20TH ST. SUITE 16 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 CONTACT: MARC MCGINNIS,. PE 425-747-5618 DRAWING INDEX A5.1 COVER SHEET/ SITE PLAN LO-106171 SITE LUMINAIRE PLAN L.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CA.1 CANOPY ELEVATIONS r r or+ E W 1 APR .22 20111 COMMUNsT( DEVELOPi .ENT H N z• • 03 CV CV 0 CV co Z03 N 07 N Q N N Z 03 E o a vi e:4/22/2011 10:35 AM Sc uroI\631_bce14700-1 AS1. I.dwg :P:\14000s\14700\arc b.o • 4o bo b0 b.a b.o b,o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o bo b.o b.o b.a t.a b.o b.o b.o b.o b0 to Tao b.o b.o to b.o to to b.o ba ba ba ha ba ba b.l ba b.l b.l b.l b.o b.o b.o b.o bo bo b.o b.n - b.o b.o b.o b.o ba b.a ba ba b.: ba b.2 4,2 b2 b.2 b.l o: b.l b.l b.l 6.1 b,l b.a bo ba bo to b.o bo ho b.o ba 6.2 b.4 b.4 b.4 a6 b., 'ce b7 70 bs 6.4 b.3 b2 ba ion b.l b.l b.: b. I0.l' 20.0' b4 t.i fox S.2 11.6 5.6 5.4 53 1.3 2.6 ia1 be b.4 1,.2 b.3 b.a 115 b.o b.o b.o b.o ba b.l bl b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o ba b.o • b.o b.o bo b.o ba b.l b.o b.o b.o b,o 00 of b.2 ,be b,o b.o b.a bo b.o ba. be be loo b.o il.o bo bo b1 b2 b7 b.o b.a b.o b.o b.o ba b.2 '06 to to b.o b.o b.0 ba b.2 bs b.o b.o b.o b.o bo b.l b.l b.3 5' B%BL\ b.o bo bo b.o bo b.l ba b.z b.o b.o b.o b.o ba ba ba b3 b.o b.o b.o bo b.o ba b.l b3 b.0 b.o b.o b,l i._ ion b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o ba b.aN b.o bo bo b.o b.o b.o ba b� b.o b;o b.o b.o ba ba b.l to b.o bo ba 'to b.a b,o b. b.a b.o t0 b.o b.o b.o bo b. 9 0 1.7 0 70 0 '3 4 13.8 77.5' 26D 25 3. 4.2 2.s 2.7 1.9 26 Io b.6 b.7 119 1.1 lm �1' *' 1 { A 5.3r al.. 40.4' ao.9 ■ 7.4 ,93, a4.0 A M E P I' 5 29. t3 9.5 29! y3 1_13' I t4' 2.6 S.6 'CO 3.6 G 2.e , z .1 -.+2.3 CU Ad [ a .1 1.0 o.a 11.0 .o r,H�i 1.3 b7 OHS b.s . be b.s _g .3' 18 58.5' 8,5' 8.5' 8.5' 8.5' 8.5' 8.5' 78.5' 8.5' 8.5' 8,5 812 b.4 ba be b.4 b.2 b.2 b3 b3 b.31 to ba bz 0, t2 b.2 ba b.2 12 2 b.: 01 112 b 1 9 v3 b.o bo • b.o to b.o b.o - b.o be ba ba b.l to. b.l ba ba ba bl b. ba bl bl 70, b b0Ui,Ty0 F 710S Ab.b Tb Ebo bRaNS�`��S JIDbN 70 INE_bl RbIGHT: -b . `o.a to b.o b.o (IFORMP?RLYbPUG"Et' SIOEND bELECIII3RICb0IOAILa9'AY b4IGH$o OF75/AY1q So b.o b.o bo bo b.o b.o to 00 b.o b.o b.o • to b.o b.o b.o bo 2 W to b.a b.o b.o to to to ea- _boo L- ' J bo bo b.o b.o to to b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a to Gbo bo 9 v3 .o b.o to b.a b.o 'ba b,o b.o bo bo b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a b.o bo b.0 b,o b.o b 0 o .0 h.0 b.o b.o b.o "bo bo b.o -''1}g b.o bo b.o . b.o to b Ib. Y b. o b. b.o 3 bol b.o Based on the information provided, all dimensions and luminaire locations shown represent recoinnencled positions. The engineer and/or architect must determine applicability of the layout to existing or future fieldeonditions. This lighting pattern represents' illumination levels calculated from laboratory data taken under con rolled conditions utilizing c o current in ustry standard 1 tings in accordancemanufacturer's 'w llfuminn ting Engineering Society approved methods. Actual performan:e of any m - es luminaire may vary due t iation in electrical voltage, tolerance in amps and other v bble field conditions. Calculations do not lude obstructions such es buildings, curbs, landscaping, or any other architectural elements unless noted. INTERURBAN AVENUE (60' PLBLICALY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY) SOU b3 e S,7 LLJ b. w b. W> b. ba b. ba b H- 2. t.6 oa b,l b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o bo b.o b.o b.o b.o ;.a b.o bo b.o Calculation Suroma LL CALC POINTS ANIIPY Cl1MMAPY PARKING SUMMARY b.o b.o b.o b.0 o b.a b.o b,o b.o b.o b.a b.o b.o b.i b.o b.o tau ba b.o bo b.9 h3 b.l bl y.9 b.3 b.2 ba Lbo b.3 b,2 ha n t.l bs b.2 la ,4 b.2 ' b.l ba (Y b.l b.l b.l bo cJ _J 1 b.; bo bo o_ ba b.o b.o b.o q w kl bl b.o b.o u la • b.l b b,l 'CREabver GENERATION 3 XAM3 LED Crossover Area Light GENERATION 3 8 b4 b.2 ba HILTON Lc) t.o b4 b2 ha b.o b3 bl b.l 1.o b.3 hi b.l ba b.o b.o h.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o tl.o - b.o bo b.o b.o ba b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o too to b.o b.o b.o b.o ho b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o b.a b.o box bo b.o bo b.o bo Il!uroinance Illuminance Illuminance WALL SCONCE Min Avg/Min 44.0 i 17.5 38.0 0.3 18.23 Max/Min 126.67 Luminaire 'Schedule Symbol Sty Label Arrangement Description LLF Lumens/Lamp Arr. Lum. Lumens Arr. Watts 0 12 A SINGLE CR03-ES-LED-84-450-CW-UE 1.000 N.A. 9567 131 --0,��> 3 B SINGLE XAM3-FT-LED-119-450-CW-UE SINGLE ON 14' POLE 1.000 N:A. 12343 184 ® 7 C SINGLE HiWS-3N-175-MH-F 0.700 16000 8137 208 1 D SINGLE HIWSD-WW-175-MH-F �_�_Ai 0.700 16000 10555 208 L_- 1 13 E SINGLE S-1-T8-32-SS12-4' STRIPS , 0.713 2950 2877 31 tAPR 22 201 Pu CDEVELO4T Total Protect Watts Total Watts v 4191 LIGHTING PROPOSAL FOR JACKSCNS FOOD N631 INTERURBAN AVE. S T0KWILLA, WA 4/21/11 LD- 106171 :HrfT ! fir REPLACE LOT UG\ POLE & FOOTING EXISTING CATCH BASIN / / RELOCATE VENT RISERS /' w/ SUPPORT // soGZ 4� \� o�cT\St) \\ P/ N 2 -Pye i yt \ �(/ Pc52\ T 0 \ N �9\ \EXISTING I.D. SIGN w/ Ns.,__i.Iry \� , EASEMENT, FROM CITY OF 7....L.\ SEATTLE—CLIGHT DEPARTMENT // \ N N `0 \-\ EXISTING RETAINING CURB TO REMAIN ALONG NORTHEAST PROPERTY LINE; NEW EGRESS WALK WILL BE FLUSH WITH TOP NEW LOT LIGHT, POLE & FOOTING EXISTING MONITOR WELL TO REMAIN, TYPICAL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NEW 13'-4"X10'XB' HIGH CONCRETE MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE w/(2) 6' HIGH GATES of 1'620' PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN EXISTING HI —RISE I . S.N - NEW LOT LIGHT, POLE & FOOTING — EXISTING OIL WATER SEPARATOR & BASIN TO REMAIN LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMES SIZE CONDITION SPACING Q VICINITY MAP QUANTITY REMARKS TREES: 0 CARPINUS BETULUS 'FRANS FONTAINE' / 2" CAL. AS SHOWN 8 STAKE & GUY ONE GROWING SEASON; NURSERY FRANS FONTAINE HPRNBEAM GROWN FOR STREET TREE USE, BRANCHED AT 6' o I GLEDITSLA TRIACANTHOS 'IMPERIAL' / 2" CAL. AS SHOWN 5 STAKE & GUY ONE GROWING SEASON; NURSERY IMPERIAL HONEY LOCUST GROWN FOR STREET TREE USE, BRANCHED AT 6: SHRUBS: BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CHERRY BOMB' / 18" - 21" 3' 0.C. 58 MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM O CHERRY BOMB JAPANESE BARBERRY HEMEROCALUS HYBRIDS 'STELLA DE ORO' / 1 GALLON 2' 0.C. 53 ® STELLA DE ORO DAYULY PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS 'ETNA' / 24" — 30" 4' 0.C. 42 MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM ETNA ENGUSH LAUREL ® VIBURNUM DAVIDII / DAVID'S VIBURNUM 21° — 24" 4' O.C. 6 MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM GROUNDCOVERS: .� ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI / KINNIKINNICK 4° POT 12° 0.C. AS REQ'D HOLD 16" FROM BORDERS, SHRUBS, AND TREES F BEACHASCRAWBESIS / 4" POT 12" 0.C. AS REED HOLD 16" FROM BORDERS, SHRUBS, AND TREES ��aiJj•J�••J�•••+"...?" CGL/1.7A PLIl- cl�l 8 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN TUKWILA STORE #631 13138 INTERURBAN AVENUE S TUKWILA, WA STATE OF WASH NGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ARTHUR M. SEIDEL CERTIFICATE NO. 706 (VALID ONLY WITH SIGNATURE) EXPIRES: 12/15/12 cc 00 U a 2 w z O • Ed w co E 0 ID O 0 a 00 c 0, 0 � o T Z 1 2 2 u 3 8 yJ CON Eg J L1.1.dwg DatefTme:4/22/2011 10:53 AM Scale: i V GSM CORNICE; COLOR TAN" 1 CHANNEL AWNING w/ROOF, COLOR: RED; ATTACHED WITH CLEAVE/ROD (ROD SIZE: 1" DIA.) E WALL SCONCE, LSI "HILTON"; TYPE: UPLIGHT / DOWNUGHT COLOR: "WHITE" W/ SILVER BAND EXTERIOR LIMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: "SENECA" CLEAR ANODIZED ALUM FRAME •& DOOR GSM CORNICE; COLOR TAN" EEXTERIOR UMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: "SERPENTINE" - AROUND LIGHT FIXTURES, TYP El WALL SCONCE, L51 "HILTON"; TYPE: UPUGHT / DOWNLIGHT COLOR: "WHITE" W/ SILVER BAND 5❑ EXTERIOR UMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: "SENECA" 1 46" CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER CAP -NATURAL GRAY 6O1-SCORE SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER- NATURAL GRA MTL DOWNSPOUTS -- CONNECT TO INTERIOR WALL DRAINS El CHANNEL AWNING w/ROOF, COLOR: RED; ATTACHED WITH CLEAVE/ROD (ROD SIZE: 1" DIA.) 1' HORIZ & VERT REVEALS/JOINTS NEW WALL SIGN, INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) / / / / / / / / / / / / // % /off /1 % / j/ �/ / / /J SOUTH ELEVATION STOREFRONT DOOR, WINDOW FRAMES, AND SPACER TO BE COLOR : "RED" GSM CORNICE; COLOR : TAN" CLEAVE/ROD (ROD SIZE: 1" DIA.) COLOR: RED EXTERIOR LIMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: "SERPENTINE" - AROUND MTL CONNECTORS, TYP © 6" HIGH EYEBROW AWNING, COLOR: "RED", EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/RED LED AT TOP FRONT EDGE; ATTACHED WITH COLOR: "RED" CLEAVE/ROD (R00 SIZE: 1" DIA.) 5❑ EXTERIOR LIMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: "SENECA" E 1 i§" CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER CAP -NATURAL GRAY © 1-SCORE SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE MASO4f RY VENEER- NATURAL GRAY la COLORPAINT CMU : "WHITE" TRASH ENCLOSURE BEYOND - E 1-SCORE SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE MASONRY - NATURAL GRAY NOTE: ALL STOREFRONT GLAZING TO BE TEMPERED i" HORIZ/VERT/45' REVEALS/JOINTS,TYPICAL GSM CORNICE; COLOR : TAN' I ! I T 9 APPROX. GRADE WEST ELEVATION COLOR KEY -a INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED •JACKSONS" WALL SIGN - AREA .113.65 SF Ln WHITE 1❑ RED ❑2 DARK GRAY ❑3 TAN THERMOCROMEX COLOR : "SERPENTINE" -OR SIMILAR 5❑ THERMOCROMEX COLOR : "SENECA" -OR SIMILAR 6❑ 1-SCORE SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE MASONRY OR VENEER "NATURAL GRAY" EApR 22 2011 COMMUICTi D VELO€ Pruitt ISSUED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW z a U 0 0 Qc$o W Z W CC Q 0 re Wrc 1— P- c, 5 W � 3} E1 $1 o Q `z 0 U $ w 2 c5 SUS 2 W 0 N Lu a z 0 CV CO O W CV N ." D] W z 3CV� ,Z N N w - Y.�..- 0 O � T Dote/Ti rne:4/22/201 1 itecturol\ 631 _bce 14700 —A2. 1 —A2.2.d COLOR KEY 1❑ 6" HIGH EYEBROW AWNING, COLOR: "RED", EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/RED LED AT TOP FRONT EDGE; ATTACHED WITH COLOR: "RED" CLEAVE/ROD (ROD SIZE 1" DIA.) -- INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED "JACKSONS" WALL SIGN - AREA =18.65 SF In WHITE 1❑ RED 2l DARK GRAY O TAN E4 THERMOCROMEX COLOR "SERPENTINE" -OR SIMILAR E THERMOCROMEX COLOR : "SENECA" \ -OR SIMILAR © 1-SCORE SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE MASONRY OR VENEER NATURAL GRAY GUARD POSTS COLOR "WHITE" TOP CAP COLOR "TAN" In PAINT CMU COLOR "WHITE' TRASH ENCLOSURE - 1-SCORE SPUT-FACE CONCRETE MASONRY - NATURAL GRAY PARAPET LINE BEYOND L .1 r DOOR FRAME, COLOR : 'DARK GRAY • ESIT DOOR COLOR 'WHITE' . APPROXIMATE ROOF UNE - J EXTERIOR LIMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: -SENECA' 1-SCORE SPUR -FACE CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER NATURAL GRAY 1.. NORTH ELEVATION GSM CORNICE; COLOR : "TAN" NEW WALL SIGN, INTERNALLY 1 CLEAVE/ROD (ROD SIZE 1' DIA.) ILLUMINATED (UNDER COLOR: RED SEPARATE PERMIT) EXTERIOR LIMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: "SERPENTINE" - AROUND MTL CONNECTORS, TYP \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ MTL DOWNSPOUTS - CONNECT TO INTERIO WALL DRAINS EXTERIOR LIMESTONE FINISH; COLOR "SENECA° DOOR FRAME, COLOR : "DARK GRAY" ELECTRICAL/ FIRE SPRINKLER ROOM CLOSET DOORS COLOR 'WHITE" 1-SCORE SPUT-FACE CONCRETE MASONRY VENEER NATURAL GRAY STOREFRONT DOOR, WINDOW FRAMES, AND SPACER TO BE COLOR : "RED" - EAST ELEVATION NOTE: ALL STOREFRONT GLAZING TO BE TEMPERED RAI ..u4 1 MTL DOWNSPOUTS - CONNECT TO INTERIOR WALL DRAINS 177 PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION W/ TRASH ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR LIMESTONE FINISH; COLOR: "SENECA" TOP CAP COLOR: "TAN' PAINT CMU COLOR: 'WHITE" GUARD POSTS COLOR: "WHITE" TRASH ENCLOSURE - 1-SCORE SPLIT -FACE CONCRETE MASONRY - NATURAL GRAY MTL GATE -COLOR: 'WHITE" ISSUED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW c3 EXTERIOR STORE ELEVATIONS TUKWILA STORE #631 31E31IJ B gggil Bg N° Tai 3❑ CURVED ALUMINUM 0R ACM FASCIA; COLOR; SHELL YELLOW — ILLUMINATED RED BAR, (3) SIDES PECTEN PANEL, (2) TYPICAL BUILDING SIDE 6" DI4 CON GUARD PO SHELL DARK PORTION SH S 3'-114" 5,S-7• 2 16" DIA. CANOPY STREET SIDE COLUMN; SHELL WHITE 1 ° ryI' DISPENSER VALANCE I II CRETE FILLED - I tH �� L II y� M „, TS; BOT. 12" GRAY; TOP 70' ELL WHITE - / / COLUMN SPACING CUSTOMER SERVICE UNIT CUSTOMER SERVICE \\y UNIT NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY (TOWELS, WATER, SQUEEGEE AND TRASH DISPOSAL UNIT); TYP. OF (4) NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION SIMILAR) PECTEN PANEL SIDE VIEW ILLUMINATED RED BAR SIDE VIEW CURVED ALUMINUM OR ACM FASCIA; COLOR: SHELL YELLOW ILLUMINATED RED BAR, (3) SIDES 3' PECTEN PANEL, SIDE VIEW Ifi Ik z l i. 1'il IIfi ;,il jl II If f In ,111 11 IA+1 I II lr �4 O_ 1 COLUMN4SPACING bil O p 2.-2 �. MN'-6' ,.r COLUMN SPACING IN. WEST ELEVATION ILLUMINATED RED 1 1 BAR, SIDE VIEW t_I CUSTOMER SERVICE UNIT (TOWELS, WATER, SQUEEGEE AND TRASH DISPOSAL UNIT); TYP. OF (4) CONCRETE SWALE; REFER CIVIL DRAWINGS PECTEN PANEL, SIDE VIEW COLOR KEY ITTI, OR SIMILAR ❑1 SHELL -RED OR SIMILAR ijSHELL -DARK GREY OR SIMILAR 3❑ SHELL -YELLOW OR SIMILAR 3ACM 2-COLOR FIAT FASCIA FACING STORE (TOP=YELLOW, BOT. = RED) PECTEN PANEL SIDE VIEW I i 1 )Iii 01'4 1 II :' o6 o 1 oo -• II I_ o X 2 S _ _ EAST ELEVATION 3 cn O < " z co 12 W W a z 0-Ozccnn z • v, 3 U g = - Y mCr0 2.9, W 8 5 g g 5 U Date/Tlme:4/22/201 10:32 AM Ea-