Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDN 2019-03-26 Item 2D - Development Agreement - Riverton Heights Mixed-Use ProjectCity of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM To: Community Development and Neighborhoods Committee Fnmnn: Jack Pace, Director DCD By: Moira Bnadehavv, Senior Planner Copy: Mayor Ekberg CJmta: March 2O.2019 Subject: Proposed Riverton Heights Mixed Use Project andOave|npnnentAgreennant Request (File #L1S-0031) Issue Should the City Council consider a Development Agreement with Rune Harkestad to develop a mixed use, 6 story building in the Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) neighborhood? Bachwound The applicant owns six parcels outlined in pink at the northwest corner of TIB and S. 1441h Street. The two specific parcels tobeused for the proposed project front on37mAvenue 8.and are outlined inblack. The site is zoned Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC) and is within the Urban Renewal Overlay District. ��M ik 09 Discussion The DevelopmentAo,eemants chapter ofthe Citv's Zoning Code (TM{}18.88) stipulates the development standards that may be modified (TMC 18.66.020) the procedures to be followed M8.80.O5O.)and the conditions ofapproval [TK8C18.00.000] The purpose Ofgdevelopment agreement is to: 1. achieve public benefit, 2. respond tochanging community needs, or 47 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 3. encourage modifications that provide the functional equivalent oradequately achieve the purposes nfotherwise applicable City standards. Proposal The applicant's plans (Attachment B) show an approximate 250 foot deep by 64 foot wide building with 43dwelling units. The unit mix includes 0studios (1496). 15- 1 b8dn]O[OS (}596); 10-2bedrooms (3796)and 8-3bedrooms (1496). Two below grade parking decks are proposed for parking for the residential units. 5,235square feet ofcommercial space is proposed for the ground level of the building. Standards fluxbi|0tv The project must be consistent with standards to the fullest extent possible; however, standards such as permitted uses, residential densities, building heights, setbacks, storm drainage, landscaping, recreation space, parking, etc. may bemodified. The Applicant's requested modifications are attached aawell oosummarized below. (Attachment A) 1AV 05 subject tncriteria' Ile 0otohee/70' � Recreation Space 2OOsq. ft. per unit Residential Parking 2per unit (86 stalls) Retail Parking Same as NCC 1 per bedroom +.5for every additional bedroom subject to criteria (57 stalls) 30sq. ft. per uni (1.290oq. ft.) stall per unit (43ota|b) Applicant has provided a Parking Utilization Study (Attaohnnent[) 1per 400oq. ft. (14 stalls) Landscaping Front —10' Side —{7 Rear —0' All setback areas shall be landscaped Front —5' Side -0' Lot Area required per unit None No action required /OD0criteria —utleast lOOfeet offrontage ouTO3; the ground floor along T[8contains active uses and design and amenities that encourage pedestrians, such as sidewalks through site, art, landscaping; adherence to a transportation management plan; car sharing program; secure covered bicycle parking for every 4dwellings; 75Y6ofrequired parking inastructure that ioscreened from view; ' The number of dwelling units is determined by other building standards subject to a limit on studio unit average Page 2 of 3 48 INFORMATIONAL EMO Page 3 Setbacks 6' front 6' front 6' front (west The closest 10' side 10' side edge) residential district is 10' rear (increase to 10' — 20' when any part of yard is within 50' of LDR, MDR, 10' rear 0' side (north and south edges) 0' rear (east edge) across the street, 37th Avenue S., which is 55 feet wide. HDR) Conditions Imposed The Council may impose any conditions to mitigate impacts or procedural requirements, such as phasing, that it deems appropriate. Discretionary, Legislative Act The Council may approve, condition, or reject the proposal, must hold a public hearing and decide on the proposal through an ordinance. Required Elements • An ordinance • A site plan for the entire project showing: any sensitive areas, required open space, perimeter buffers, location and density of dwellings, and location and size of any commercial uses; • The time frame for build -out • Project specific mitigation conditions such as streets, utilities, schools, parks • Dimensional standards • Any other item considered necessary by the City Council Financial Impact The value of the project has not been provided to evaluate the financial impact. Next Steps 1. If the CDN Committee agrees, the Department of Community Development will negotiate the details of the proposed agreement with the applicant and prepare a recommendation for the City Council on the standards to be modified. Staff will draft a development agreement and accompanying ordinance. 2. CDN would then review the proposed modifications, development agreement and draft ordinance and when they are satisfied, forward to Committee of the Whole for a public hearing, deliberation, and decision. Recommendation CDN Committee approval to proceed with a development agreement for the site and the project. Attachments A. Development Agreement Request B. Project conceptual plans C. Parking Study Page 3 of 3 50 February 25, 2019 Moira Bradshaw City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Riverton Heights Mixed Use Development Agreement PREI 7-0012 37th Ave S, / 14223 Tukwila Inel Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98168 Request for Modifications of Standards Dear Moira, This letter is to discuss the Riverton Heights Mixed use project and identify a short list of modifications of standards we would like to pursue in preparation of developing the referenced project. 1. Building Height: Increase the maximum building height from NCC zone standards of 45 feet to 70 feet as measured from the grade plane to be consistent with Building Code standards and ordinance 2330. Increase stories to 6 with 5 residential stories over 1 commercial story with below grade garage under the commercial. 2. Recreation Space standards: Provide 30 s.f. per unit of interior recreation / amenity space. Exterior recreation space is available across the street to the west. Proximity to recreation space to include existing park amenities, similar to parking analysis taking into account available transit and light rail infrastructure proximity. 3. Parking Supply Standard: 1 stall per residential dwelling unit. 2.5 stalls / 1000 sl for retail space. The proximity of the site to light rail and transit support the concept of parking reduction for this project. 4. Landscaping: North Property line — 0' East Property line — 0' South Property line — 0' West Property line — 5' (street) 8383 158th Ave NE, Suite 250 Redmond, WA 98052 425-636-8006 51 5. Lot area per Unit: no minimum; density to be determined by other standards, such as parking, height, landscaping, etc. 6. Setbacks: North: Underground Parking Garage up to 6'-O" above adjacent residential finished floor elevation: 0 feet Retail and Residential above ground: 10'-0" East: Underground Parking Garage up to 6'-0" above the adjacent residential finished floor elevation: 0 feet Retail and Residential above ground: 10'-0" South: Underground Parking Garage: 0 feet Retail and Residential above ground: 0 feet West: Underground Parking Garage up to 6'-0" above adjacent residential finished floor elevation: 0 feet Retail and Residential above ground: 10'-0" Do not hesitate to call should you have any questions on these items. Sincerely, Partners Architectural Design Group, Inc. -*‘ Eric E. Koch Principal 8383 158th Ave NE, Suite 250 Redmond, WA 98052 425-636-8006 2 +318.5 1 6 7.2 +319 +317.5 +317 17.5 RESIDENTIAL PARKING 18 STALLS +311 +314 4 +312.5 DOWN TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING APARTMENT BUILDING 2 0 +308.5 +311 PARCEL 199.00 N.T.5 +311 0 +310.5 0 0 I COMMERCIALII LEASE AREA 5,235 SF +311 0 21'-3" 1 311 310.5 0.5 +308.5 RETAIL PARKING 0 +301,75 A +306.75 +307.5 DOWN TO RESIDENTIAL �RAR KI NG 308 0 BARTELL DRUGS BUILDING ERVICE ELEVATOR COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL TRASH ENCLOSURE RETAIL. PARKING 320 RESIDENTIAL PARKING 42 STALLS +301 1 7.25 6 V +316 +317.5 +317 17.5 +3141 +313.5 +314 +311 +311 +312.5 +311 oink noo 0 2' 10' 20' +311 0.5 310.5 310.5 310.5 +308.5 0 +301 +301.5 +306.75 +307.5 +306 /2/ N,T,S 111" IOW W W 4318 774 1 -4, 5 444, 45455 5,54555e -14 Ti 4 44,4:: €4442 +31 +317.25 I +319 LI L .NNE. 0 2' 10' 20' COMMERCIAL LEASE AREA 1,000 SF +320 +316 +317.5 +317 7.5 +313.5 +313.5 = 14= 5444, RESIDENTIAL UNITS STORAGE UNITS +320 /441/4 -54 +314 +313.5 +314 +311 +311 +311 €4,4 444 +311 +312.5 22& 1/4" +311 TS ENNEN 0 2' 10' 20' 4€4 -5€4744 55_1 +311 +310.5 0.5 54-44-54, 454445444445" 44-444-4- 4-554-4,e' ,445455,544-44- 545, 4 5541, 4€€€€€ rar 54,5,45 4, 44 5,,/, 45\45544 \ 5 45-45,45 €4-'5'54's ii-€4 4554€ -455 5 ,4il 55 -€54f/ 454,55," /44,44,4444€44,4,, +311 --€45*-55, 5,514554 0.5 0.5 f5'5,?5,4 +309 +308.5 455-54/44 \ 4,544, 54,555s, 6„;"1-1f1 /5444 0 .75 +306.75 +307.5 55, 44444 44-4 RESIDENTIAL 7=lx (7) STUPIO 20 = 1 x (20) 1DEPROOM 30 = 1.5 x (20) 2 EROOM 16 = 2 x (8) 3 DEPROOM PARKING REQ P - 73 55 UNITS PARKING PROVIDED - 59 (GARAGE) 14 (ON -SITE) +306 1 COMMERCIAL 6,2 5 5- X 41'000 SF KI\G 12AKI EQ = 25 5 ALS G ROVI)EP - 28 5 ALL5 -s= i-3= RtA'VtW,., 0 &JEST ELEVATION SCALE: I/O' • l'-0" JI1iiii • i= s+r +343'-0" -is::32.0170" -s= -,913111'±:Y: MATERIAL SCHEDULE COMPOSITE TRIM 2, COMPOSITE PANEL 3, 1-1R-36 METAL PANELS (VERTICAL) 4, COMPOSITE LUINDOUJ TRIM S. METAL CORNICE COPING 6, HR-36 METAL PANELS (HORIZONTAL) 7. CONCRETE 13- STEEL CHANNEL 0 STEEL GUARDRAIL 10VINYL WINDOW II, ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 12, HOLLOW METAL DOOR 13. GARAGE DOOR 14, INTEGRAL COLOR GROUND FACE GNU IS, HORIZCBITAL STEEL CANOPY lil I II E ' 0 EA5T ELEVATION SCALE, I/OT • P-O" PAINT COLOR PI - SYCAMORE TAN, BO 26165 P2- UNIVERSAL KHAKI, SW 61S0 P3- MATTE BLACK CMU 111 - KHAKI (GROUNDFACE) CONCRETE CI - NATURAL GRAY FINIS1-4E1) METAL Fl AEP SPAN, COOL METALLIC CHAMPAGNE F2 - BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM VINYL VI - BLACK 11FJri II 2 a uUTACTF, FBATTFT ;,WTHat +37340" OOF +36340" EVEL L-5 'REVEL L-4 +3431-0" EVEL L-2 +3231-0" 4'1 EVEL L-1 +320-0 EV E L -L-1 +311-0" ARKING LEVEL 1 ARKING LEVEL 2 -4444444-- 4444, 4.44444444,44-'44- CDSOUTI-I ELEVATION I/6" • 44-4 -444A, :4*5-:444-14-444 444,4, "44 44-44-411114 447444-147444-4444a 414-4444-4 - _ - - - In °NORTH ELEVATION 174:414; 1.444144i 1=1 F I - 4-444.14- 4,4444-44-444---444-444444'!444-44-7d :44444 ",-4 -44 " 44- 4444-44 4444 44.474 44444444441474-4 4-4 47' Ji 11 00;35, tt ;-i-43,1•4 - El 414721 4W-44f. tZ,Mi arg,74 - fen "y- 744-4 44,474,4444 7- ADJACENT GRADE 315.8 APPROXIMATELY FINISHED FLOOR OF ADJACENTAPARTMENT TO THE NORTH APPROXIMATELY EXISTING GRADE AT APARTMENT TO THE NORTH 44444-4,441644.7 3444.4. 4,4 731-0" OOF 0" EVEL L-5 +3531-0" EVEL L-4 `PtEVEL L-3 EVEL L-2 ,.+3231-0" 4.LEVEL L-1 - +32040" RKI NG LEVEL PARKING OCCUPANCY AND UTILIZATION STUDY Riverton Heights 14227 Tukwila International Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98168 Ab INVESTMENT AND CONSULTING GROUP Aklilu Gebreyesus, CPP 410 0U 6:9 co m January 4, 2019 59 INTRODUCTION SEG 56th LLC has retained Ab Investment & Consulting Group, to assess the parking lot located at 14227 Tukwila International Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98168 (Riverton Heights). The goal of this study was to document the current demand and utilization of parking lot. Ab Investment & Consulting group conducted parking occupancy surveys three days a week for four weeks between the hours of 10 AM to 10 PM. These collection periods provided data from different demand times so that the study group can establish a peak, weekday and weekend utilization period for the study area. The total parking supply is defined as the number of available stalls within the study area. A total of 158 stalls were included in the survey for this study — designated loading stalls were not surveyed. Parking occupancy rates are calculated in this report for an average weekday and weekends. A parking occupancy rate can be defined as the percentage of the parking supply that is observed to be occupied during a given period. Parking occupancy is reported on an hourly basis. PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY The purpose of this study was to derive a comprehensive and objective understanding of parking occupancy and utilization in the study area during peak days. METHODOLOGY A complete survey of parking use (occupancy) was conducted on three "typical days" representing parking activity when the lot is busy. The study was conducted in December 2018, and 84 sample data were collected (table 1) Ab Investment and Consulting Group I BASICS OF PARKING UTILIZATION PARKING UTILIZATION LOOKS AT THE UMBER OF PARKING SPACES THAT ARE OCCUPIED VERSUS THOSE AVAILABLE AT CERTAINPOINTS OF THE DAY, THIS IS GENERALLY DESCRIBED USING THE PERCENT OF PARKING CAPACITY THAT IS OCCUPIED. FOR INSTANCE, A PARKING LOT WITH 100 PARKING SPACES AND 30 PARKED VEHICLES HAS PARKING UTILIZATION RATE OF 30-PERCENT. IN THE CASE OF OFF-STREET PARKING, THE OPTIMAL UTILIZATION RATE IS GENERALLYACCEPTEDTO BE 90- PERCENT. THE EXAMPLE LOT DESCRIBED ABOVE WOULD HAVE 10 EMPTY SPACES. ABOVE 90-PERCEIT„ PARKING IS BEYOND THE FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY OF THE LOT AND MANY DIVERS WOULD CONSIDER IT FULL THE ON -STREET PARKING OPTIMAL UTILIZATION RATE IS 85- PERCENT AT THIS POINT, A DRIVER CAN EXPECT TO FIND 1 FREE SPACE FOR EVERY 7 OCCUPIED, ABOVE 85-PERCENT, OCCUPANCY IS BEYOND FUNCTIONAL. CAPACITY CAUSING DRIVERS TO CIRCLE IN SEARCH OF A VACANT SPACE 1206.717.5680 60 |norder tnensure the 'snapshot acquired through this study was erepresentative ofgeneral parking conditions, field assessment was conducted by our senior staff to select an appropriate and representative time and days before the data collection phase started. STUDY AREA The map below provides a layout of the parking locations. The lot has 158 available parking stalls and is utilized by the patrons and employee of the business. Image - shows the study area AhInvestment and Consulting Group | 1 206717.5680 61 DATA COLLECTION Parking occupancy counts were performed over a four -week period between December 5, 2018, and December 29, 2018, during the following times: • Wednesday through Saturday, between 10:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M., In addition, the parking supply of the study area was confirmed. PARKING UTILIZATION Occupancy surveys were conducted from December 5th — December 29th during different hours for the designated area. The average hourly counts (occupancy) are summarized below in tablel. 12/5/2018 12/7/2018 12/8/2018 12/12/2018 01-4 12/14/2018 12/15/2018 if49100PMA 40 71 78 112 118 76 59 71 83 77 80 70 85 94 71 6:00PM 102 83 96 SO 33 56 37 49 29 59 56 32 63 45 27 89 83 95 110 78 55 12/19/2018 31 72 74 85 86 68 42 12/21/2018 27 64 70 83 87 70 46 12/23/2018 40 61 93 88 106 62 54 12/26/2018 54 70 96 70 83 56 37 12/28/2018 31 48 83 93 72 66 22 51 61 31 55 40 59 12/29/2018 31 52 75 84 89 58 46 Average OCCLI pancy 43 69 84 81 86 60 38 Lowest Occupancy 27 40 70 70 59 45 22 HighestOccupancy 61 112 118 95 110 78 55 Tablel- shows data collected during the duration of the study. Ab Investment and Consulting Group I ww,,,v,abk:A,corn I 206.717.5680 62 Occupancy levels reached their peak at 2 PM, where 118 of the 158 total spaces (75%) were occupied. i I I 2 I s�m�m o��o�x zn�opw The utilization profiles subsection explores and compares utilization based on the time of day and day of the week through parking utilization profile charts (below). These profiles show how many spaces are occupied and how many are available, providing a visual representation for comparing occupancy and availability etdifferent points inthe day nm 160 pm zm xm 80 60 40 20 n ^ -Average Occupancy - Lowest Occupancy 1111--l" Highest Occupancy -Capacity 63 CONCLUSION The parking occupancy for the lot was observed to be occupied at the peak of approximately 75 percent during 2:00 p.m. period on Friday. Based on this study the occupancy is well below the demand on a peak day. AN 85% OCCUPANCY RATE IS A WIDELY - ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARD FOR OPTIMAL ON -STREET PARKING OCCUPANCIES AND 90% FOR OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES THESE ARE TARGET RATES FOR PREVENTING THE ADDITIONAL AND UNNECESSARY TRAFFIC CIRCLING FOR A SPACE WHILE STILL MAKING GOOD USE OF THE PARKING SUPPLY AND ATTRACTING CUSTONIERS, Ab Investment and Consulting Group I www„,*cg,,c(„ml I 206.717.5680 64