Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CDN 2019-09-24 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
City of Tukwila Community Development & Neighborhoods Committee 0 DeSean Quinn, Chair 0 Dennis Robertson • Verna Seal AGENDA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 — 5:30 PM HAZELNUT CONFERENCE Room (At east entrance of City Hall) Distribution: D. Quinn Mayor Ekberg D. Robertson D. Cline V. Seal R. Bianchi K. Hougardy C. 0"Fl a herty Z. Idan A. Yours L. Humphrey Item 1. PRESENTATION(S) 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a. Entry and wayfinding signage. Brandon Mlles, Business Relations Manager b. Lodging tax six -year financial model and ending fund balance. Brandon Mlles, Business Relations Manager c, Approval to submit a grant application in the amount of $100,000 to increase housing supply and affordability based on House Bill 1923. Meredith Sampson, Assistant Planner d. A resolution restating the City's commitment to being diverse, tolerant and inclusive. Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS 4. MISCELLANEOUS Recommended Action a. Discussion only, b. Discussion only. c. Committee consideration/ decision. d. Forward to 10/14 C.O.VV. and 10/21 Regular Mtg. Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 Page Pg.1 PgAS Pg.51 Pg.77 It> The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 206-433-1800 (Tukwilaciwaerk©TukwilaWA.gov) for assistance. City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development and Neighborhoods FROM: Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: September 16, 2019 SUBJECT: Wayfinding and Gateway Signage for the City ISSUE Briefing on creation of a wayfinding and gateway signage plan for the City. BACKGROUND In 2017, the City completed its brand development, focused on how the City would promote itself to tourists, both day and night. As part of the brand development, the City completed an in-depth "Tukwila Brand Fieldwork Report." This report was completed by a tourism expert who visited the City and experienced it as a tourist, providing input on the City's strength and areas of improvement for attracting and retaining tourists. One of the categories under the Fieldwork Report was regarding "Navigation, Wayfinding, and Signage." Under this section, the City was ranked as needing major improvement in areas regarding city gateway signs, vehicular direction, and pedestrian directional signage (see below). 1 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 Navigation, Wayfinding and Signage First impressions start at the entrances to the city, and appearances really count when it comes to enticing visitors and the economic well-being they can bring to places. Visitors are attracted to, and spend more time in, places that are attractive, clean, welcoming, and well maintained. Signage and navigation systems serve vital roles. They inform, guide, and motivate travelers. They, are also important in shaping the identity of a place through their style, design, colors, lettering, content and placement. Access to visitor information in the form of brochures, maps and personal advice is critical to visitor satisfaction, extending a visitor's length of stay in the community and whether or not they return. Assessment Comments Main Freeway signage Adequate WSDOT signs are adequate. Improvements vill be identified in a detailed way assessment, City Gateways Major Improvement Tukwila and Southcenter gateways do not stand out and do not provide a welcoming sense of "place" for Visitors. Vehicular Directional Major Improvement Directional signs that guide visitors through Southcenter are inadequate and dated. Pedestrian Directional Major Improvement Integrated pedestrian level signage across the district does not exist and \you'd be beneficial in several areas. Business Signage Minor Improvement Businesses feel that people can't find them because of signage restrictions. The team did notice that at times some business signs were hard to see due to their design or size, and others were partially obscured. A coordinated, integrated approach here - where possible would help. 7\lap Displays/ Kiosks Major Improvement Display map kiosks/ directories featuring all of Southcenter do not exist and would be very useful at key points in the district. Southside Seattle Visitor Excellent / Minor Excellent tourist information and booking service, Information Center/Desk Improvement with friendly and helpful staffing. It is located near one mall entrance only and \ vithout more prominent promotion throughout the mall could easily be missed. Hotel Guest Information Nlajor Improvenlent Racks Hotel tourism brochure racks seem to only include material on Renton and Bellevue but nothing on Tukwila, except a Westfield Southcenter, limited content, double -sided page promoting Seattle's Best Shopping'. 6 2 Z:\Council Agenda Items1Mayor's Office\CDN, 2019.09.241Wayfinding and Gateway Sign Plan.doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 DISCUSSION The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) has expressed a desire to create a Wayfinding and Gateway Signage Plan for the City. Signage is a valuable tool in the City's branding efforts. As people leave tourists destinations, such as the Mall, Starfire Sports, of the Museum of Flight, it is important that the City reinforce that these destinations are in Tukwila. The Plan would not involve the actual installation of signage. The plan would provide a detail framework of signage that could be installed in the future. It would show locations, by type of signage, construction plans, and estimated costs of installing specific signs. The Plan would also be branded, specifically in the City's tourist areas, such as the Southcenter District, near Starfire Sports, and near the Museum of Flight. The existing signage in the City's Southcenter District has no uniformity, nor is there specific direction on what type should be installed in where. Several signs are outdated, such as signs that reference King County along the City's trail system. Attached with is a document entitled, "What is Community Wayfinding?" The document discusses the benefits and suggested process for creating a Wayfinding and Gateway Signage Plan for cities. Depending on the scope, the creation of a Plan for the City of Tukwila could cost between $50,000 and $100,000. As a point of reference, the City of Burien completed a Wayfinding and Gateway Signage Plan focused just on its downtown core, with a cost of $48,750. LTAC has expressed support for using lodging tax funds to pay for the creation of the Plan. As part of the Plan, the City would need to determine the overall geographical scope of the project, for example do we also examine signage in residential areas or Tukwila International Blvd? Staffs initial recommendation is that we would do the entire City. Note, that in residential zones and at City facilities in commercial zones, the tourist brand would likely not be used. Even if the City does not know what the overall design of signs in residential zones should be, understanding where signs should go would be valuable as the City completes future capital projects. Paying for future signage could include a mix of sources, including lodging tax funds, included in the capital construction costs of projects, or as part of the City's regular maintenance of existing signage FINANCIAL IMPACT Creation of a Wayfinding and Gateway Signage Plan could cost between $50,000 and $100,000, likely using lodging tax funds. RECOMMENDATION Discussion Only. Staff would like to issue an RFQ/RFP to finalize the cost. Once a final scope of work is determined, staff will go through the lodging tax application process to obtain funding. ATTACHMENTS • Document entitled, "What is Community Wayfinding?" • Wayfinding and Gateway Signage Plan PowerPoint Presentation Z:\Council Agenda Items1Mayor's 0 ice\CDN, 2019.09.241Wayfinding and Gateway Sign Plan.doc 3 4 . `"*.00.14Vikst„,71kr, RN Community Wayfinding is the art and science of moving people through a city, town or region to desired locations within them using a number of visual cues including, but not limited to, guide signage, place identification, visual landmarks, space planning and various forms of experiential graphic design. Pl/hat 4/te Me eenOto,? Guides Visitors to Key Places It gets people to where you want them more efficiently. Brings Awareness to Other Places Destinations on guide signs expose places to visitors who may otherwise miss. Encourages extended stays. Reassures, Reduces Stress When visitors see well maintained signs, they are reassured knowing they are on the right path and in a safe area. Stimulates Economic Growth When guided to destinations and parking, visitors spend less time in cars and more time in your retail areas and attractions. Business owners feel supported. Many new residents who open businesses were once visitors who were impressed by a positive place experience and a pro business environment. Reduces Sign Clutter New signs replace redundant layers of old signs, they consolidate messaging onto fewer signs and improves the visual environment. Fixes Broken Systems The process of evaluating existing signage exposes missing signs, gaps in messaging and signs that contradict one another. Connects people to atifided 6 may" When you integrate a community's brand within the design of a wayfinding system, it not only guides people to and through places, it serves as a highly effective brand delivery mechanism. at 66, Supports the Brand When the essence of your brand is echoed in the physical environment, it enhances a visitor's perception and links your marketing communications with your place. Knits Parts of the Community Together Consistent graphics in wayfinding signage serve as a visual catalyst that helps to unite segmented areas and districts into one organized region. Turns a Designation into a Destination Brand supportive wayfinding celebrates the unique character of the community and transforms it into a unified memorable experience. Raises Community Pride When a brand is supported throughout a community, a stronger sense of place is felt by residents and raises their pride knowing they are part of a unique community. Conne ople t. experiences Wayfinding sign systems vary in size and complexity. Depending on your community's density and geographical size, a wayfinding sign system can be as simple as a few guide signs on Main Street or as complicated as a comprehensive program with landscaped gateways, district demarcations, several levels of vehicular and pedestrian guide signs, kiosks, directories, interpretive signs and trailblazers. Each unique program incorporates a combination of device types that are customized to perform within a specific environment. Gateways Gateways welcome visitors into your community or district. They make that critical first impression that tells people they are entering a great, successful place. Place gateways in areas that show the best your community has to offer. Vehicular Guides Vehicular guide signs are very important in a wayfinding system. They guide cars to the places people seek through routes you want them to travel and to parking nearest to destinations. Pedestrian Guides Pedestrian guide signs help people find destinations within a reasonable walking distance. They encourage people to explore and guide them to businesses who may not have Main Street exposure. Trailblazers Trailblazers are small, usually iconic signs that mark bike or pedestrian paths. This group often includes site markers or interpretive graphics. When used as pedestrian trail markers, they can also serve as visual references for emergency personnel responding to 911 calls by including locator numbers. 7 Information Kiosks & Directories Information kiosks are structures or monuments that include information about a place. Typically they display an area map and key destinations within walking distances. Covered versions offer shelter from the elements and may include brochure dispensers and interactive displays. Monuments require less space and serve more as directories. Identity Signs Streets, government facilities, parking lots, parks and public venues need to be clearly identified in order for all the dots of a wayfinding system to connect. Regulatory Rules and Regulations are typically placed near entrances to parking areas and public places. They control behavior for the purpose of public safety and to protect property and the environment. Banners Banners are a relatively inexpensive way to enhance an environment. They can support a city brand, create a sense of place or arrival, demarcate a district, celebrate seasons, or promote events and venues. Message Centers Also known as LED signs or electronic message boards. These displays are computerized electronic visual communication devices that can be programmed to target specific audiences. 8 Interpretive Interpretive signs tell stories about a place. They are used to communicate a specific message to visitors and to connect them with the environment. They inform, educate, and entertain. Public Art Public art such as murals, sculptures, architectural accents and other creative expressions enhance an environment and serve as visual orientation signals. Landmarks Landmarks are visible elements in the environment that serve as spatial reference points helping people navigate through an environment. They can be public art, landscaped green -ways, public plazas, roundabouts, fountains, clock towers and iconic buildings. Street Paving and Crosswalks Applying special paving treatments to intersections and crosswalks help define pedestrian areas, improve the visual appeal of a district and help pedestrians and drivers with spatial orientation. They help to demarcate districts, public gathering places, and town centers. They also cue drivers to slow down. Street Furniture and Fixtures Street furniture and other fixtures such as public benches, street lamps, trash receptacles and signposts add character to an urban environment and encourage people to congregate. 9 The Design budget will take care of planning, system design, bid documentation and production oversight. Design fees are based on several factors such as population size, quantity of destinations, range of sign types and aesthetic expectations. Here are very broad budgets to give you a general idea on what to plan for: Small Town: $40,000 to $50,000 Medium Sized City or Large Downtown: $60,000 to $75,000 Large City or Region with Multiple Communities: $75,000 to $100,000 A Fabrication budget will take care of permitting, fabrication and installation. Depending on the size of the community, quantity of signs, infrastructure/ground conditions, wind load requirements, material types and travel distance, costs could range dramatically. Here are some very general estimates: Small Town: $150,000 to $300,000 Medium Sized City or Large Downtown: $500,000 to $1,000,000 Large City or Region with Multiple Communities: $1,000,000 to $2,000,000+ *These budget figures are very broad and are not intended to be firm recommendations. Instead, they are intended to serve as a starting point when considering a wayfinding program. There are many factors that determine what a budget should be for the specific needs of a given community A qualified designer and fabricator should be engaged to help determine budgets for specific needs. Managing a community wayfinding project can be a challenge. There are lots of things to consider. How do I find a qualified designer? What is the process? How long will it take? Who do I need on my team? How can 1 get public buy -in? How do I get DOT approval? How do I manage who and what gets included on which signs? How do I find a qualified sign contractor? How can I get the most bang out of my limited budget? The following is a summary of our recommended seven step process: 1. Get Organized If you haven't already assembled a wayfinding steering committee, this is an important first step you need to take before anything else. Managing a wayfinding program is complicated and time consuming. Once you have evaluated the need and decided to launch a wayfinding initiative, begin assembling your steering committee which will be comprised of a small, dedicated group of individuals who are vested in the successful creation of a community wayfinding program. Include someone from the governing body such as an administrator or city manager. A public works director is good to have on the team as well. You'll want to include a representative from a downtown development organization, someone from your local tourism group and chamber of commerce. Include a city planner, a representative from the Department of Transportation and a leader from an economic development association. Also consider including key business leaders, a representative from your branding or marketing department and at least one person from the residential community. You'll need to appoint a team leader who will serve as a steering committee point person and program organizer. The team leader will act as a conduit between outside stakeholders, the public, the program designer, the fabricator and other consultants who are linked to the wayfinding initiative. 11 Hire a Qualified VVayfinding Designer Make sure you hire a qualified wayfinding designer. A good resource for candidates is the Society for Experiential Graphic Design (segd.org). Most qualified design firms who specialize in wayfinding, belong to this organization. If you reach out to SEGD, they'll notify their members about your project. You'll want to know how long a designer has been in business and if they have experience with similar projects. Look at their samples of built programs and consider their design quality and diversity of style. They should have a good understanding of branding and fabrication. How concise is their methodology? How well do they respond? Do they demonstrate an understanding of your community's culture, history and objectives or do they respond with a cookie -cutter answers and solutions? Issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) ahead of a Request for Proposal (RFP). This will allow you to evaluate bidders' qualifications and pair down finalists who will be invited to provide a cost proposal. Once you have a designer on board, make sure there is no scope overlap with other consultants like architects, engineers and planners — all of which might include elements of wayfinding in their services. 2. Site Assessment & Planning Before visiting the site, the designer will need to get their ducks in a row. They should prepare a detailed project schedule. Work with them to create a site visit itinerary. When the designer comes to town, the first thing on the itinerary should be a morning kick-off meeting with your steering committee. Reconfirm the plans and timing for the visit, talk about the objectives and challenges. Pull a large site plan out mark it up with notes and highlight program specifics such as points of arrival, districts, traffic flow, pedestrian areas and destinations. This working document will be used throughout the visit and kept by the designer as a reference when they create the assessment report. Exploring the Area After the kick-off meeting, take the designer on a guided tour of the project area. This will give them a perspective from the resident's point of view. Then they 12 should go out and explore on their own. This will give them a perspective from the first time visitor's point of view. For the next day or 2, the designer will interview several stakeholders to collect additional information, opinions and needs. Stakeholders should represent a wide sample of your community. Before the designer wraps things up and leaves town, recap their visit and discuss their findings and possible solutions. The designer will return to their office, distill the collected data and develop their analysis. They will consolidate their findings in an Assessment Report. The report should include, at a minimum, reaffirmation of the program's objectives, a summary of stakeholder interviews, field observations and general conditions, a study of traffic flow, arrival points, destinations and decision points, photo documentation and recommendations. 3. Concept Generation Once the assessment report has been approved. The designer will start generating concepts. We recommend that after the designer has had a chance to do some rough schematics, they will host a working charrette with your team to brainstorm. It's important that your team be part of the creative process. This will give the designer an early nudge in the right direction before they invest a lot of time developing concepts. Depending on your scope and the availability of the designer, host a public workshop before the concepts are fully developed. This will give the designer additional design cues and will also give your residents an opportunity to voice their ideas and concerns. This is great first step in gaining public 13 consensus and will mitigate possible negative reactions to the eventual unveiling of the final program. With input from the charrette and public workshop, the designer will develop 3 to 4 wayfinding concepts. The main objective is to explore a range of directions based on collected information and the current brand. Select a Concept The ultimate goal for this phase, is to identify a single concept to be refined into a final design. Sometimes there are 2 concepts that are equally preferred. To help evaluate the finalists, you'll want to get estimates of probable costs from one or more fabricators. Either build or create Photoshop mock- ups that will show you which design works best in the real environment. One concept should be chosen for further development. 4. Design Development The designer will develop the chosen concept into its final family. Concurrently, the wayfinding plan will be developed to include sign locations and their proposed messages. Have the designer go out in the field with one or more of your team to record the exact location of each sign with a photograph, GPS or GIS coordinates and a visual reference to the sign type. 5. Documentation The designer will prepare 4 documents. These documents with the RFP, become the bid documents. The designer will prepare design intent drawings which will include scaled elevations, sections, details and specification call outs; a message schedule will be created to catalogue each sign type, its message and general location reference; a location plan is generated from the approved version of the online (Google) working plan. 14 In some cases a sign removal plan is created to identify signs that must be removed prior to the installation of new signs. If the quantity is minimal, these can be indicated on the location plan. The designer should help you with written program (technical) specifications in the form of CSI Section 101400 Signage Specifications. These will be inserted into the RFP. All templates and production - ready art should be produced before the fabrication contract is awarded. 6. Bidding When you are ready to look for qualified sign contractors, you'll want to issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). This will allow you to pre -qualify respondents in order to streamline the management process and to focus your attention on sign contractors who you know are up to the task. You will want to know how many years they've been in business, are they experienced with similar projects? Look at their sample programs, consider their fabrication quality. Check on their standing with Dunn and Bradstreet and the Better Business Bureau. Require that they be fully bonded. Ask if they will be jobbing out any of the project and if so, what part? As with the designer, do they demonstrate an understanding of your community and objectives or do they respond with vague answers and solutions. You may or may not elect to issue both an RFQ and RFP. For the sake of this guideline, we will continue from the RFP. Allow bidders 3 to 4 weeks to respond with their proposals. Give them a week to submit questions. Post the answers as an addendum on your website or issue them to all bidders at the same time. Once you collect the bids. Compare them with one another. Select the best 3 or 4 and see how they line up. Interview shortlisted candidates and make an award based on a reasonable price, thoroughness, experience and how you intuitively feel about them. 7. Fabrication and Installation Start things off with a meeting with the fabricator, designer and members from 15 the steering committee. Review the details of the project, and make sure everyone is on the same page. Set communication protocols and go over roles, deliverables and the project time -line. Fabrication In about 3 to 4 weeks the fabricator will submit their shop drawings. The designer will review them for compliance with the design intent drawings and the contracted scope of work. Upon approval, the fabricator will proceed to prepare and submit product, material and paint samples which will also be reviewed by the designer. For the next couple of months, the fabricator will be building the system. At about the 70% completion point, the designer should inspect the products at the fabricator's facility to catch any last minute flaws that can be corrected before they're delivered to the project site. If the designer can't get to the fabricator's shop, then detailed progress photos should be studied. Installation Just before installation, the fabricator should be on site to mark the sign locations with low profile surveyors stakes. If installation is scheduled for a complete install, the process should take between 3 to 5 weeks, depending on the magnitude of your program. In many cases installation is phased over time, sometimes over a period of months or in annual increments. After each phase of installation, the designer will inspect the products in place and assess their condition. If the install is deemed complete and there is no need to make corrections, the designer will advise you to issue final payment to the sign contractor. Maintaining the System Now that your branded wayfinding system is in place, a maintenance plan should be adopted. As part of their contract, the sign contractor should supply you with maintenance methods for the various materials used in the program. Someone 1 6 from your team or a designated city employee should conduct an annual inventory of all signs in the system and fill out a conditions report. If signs need to be cleaned or repaired, this should be done immediately. If you keep your system looking like new, it will tell visitors you are a successful community and your brand will continue to work for you. Southeast Studio 12161 Ken Adams Way Suite 110-Y1 Wellington, FL 33414 Southwest Studio PO Box 1202 Ouray, CO 81427 Midwest Studio 5000 81st Lane North Minneapolis, MN 55443 Alberta Studio 340 Midpark Way SE Suite 300 Calgary, Alberta Canada T2X 1P1 18 0 —o 0 0 -C 0 -0 . OA C) z 73 C ("0 4) C CU E O 0 y > cu 0 >. 4—, c D E E 0 u September 201 19 hat are the Exi Conditions? 20 Wayfinding Signage a) 00 CO c OD OD c 73 L C6 4- 0 v) W c a) co isitors to Key Places o CD 73 i av 4J O 0 v) v) c N L r0 Q N vi OA Q) C 0 5 'i co 0 m ci Reassures, Reduces Stress 0 2 w U ates Econom E Reduces Sign Clutter xes Broken Systems 21 Wayfinding Signage 01111•111111=11ft • ammo, ctD E cu cu • 0 --cc) OD _C bi) co 4--) 0 c C •D U C CU 4— —C 7.— 0 ',/, (I) C t (D COL-- Li) CO LIJ s_ bx) • — +-J E c) o c -o o -J -o ro co E 0 c al 0 o D a) a) u 1— -o cc 22 ) - § cu _ 2 , E (# / } DA j, _ \ 8 3 9 E 2\ •tE >g w oc ; S \ t ¥ & : u 74Ji§;\\}/\\} §\V)0_411 0U7& e%{/2—@ a. o0 \ �>I/ O. I Z j LE / ( O. §7§E 23 N ca ocu co 24 v) • Pedestrian G 25 (i) V) 0 c 0 +a co E LJ _a 4- 7 • (7 c 2 IL - a) s 0 V aU • v) L CD NJ co 26 CIA 0 4J o1 27 Message Centers 28 29 V c co bD c • \— (/) co 0 n� � W 0 L u U 30 0 4-) 31 32 e Observations a) -E 't -0 ✓ l E 0 0 --' — Lal an O 2 &) ru ro ad E bo 15 00 z m c t 0 . c 4., E lc1 4- C) bn V° V 0 L .+' 4-',„) j 71 4- -, a.,,,— all 2.' 0 > @ >, @ j°' 1:5 -I-. 4c-' a.) E E ad E 17 tr 00 4-, • ra • - • - E cl- c ro, 0) 00 " ca -0 _C -a. if a >, LI a.: CI) Mr a) ra -c ▪ E t`f, - 7,-, E 0 ... V @ 0 rD C -C 4— a) _E .-c> (1) 0 4, 7 - a) 0 4-,—> 44 .• 2.1 a) 4 ..c Evi ui `" o) ., E.i.E Z at +.. E Ian 4-'C to m7o eu - ▪ , a '5 ry 1. _,>-, ci ro _E , = 0 -a tri la'D Li ?; ,..- c a/ a.1 0 n3 br) ,- ad a = C "10 —4_, u '13.0 "-' 1-- — 4- _C 0 , >.. .4.., C < • to ›.- .c a = 0 ra 0,/ 1:11 Ca. 0• 0 o C o ro -c 0 7137.0 ai _C 4-' 4-, rtrz .—ro >2 — ru '+-0 >4. E C CL V CL 4-0 Z tf, . -," ro .... CL a m ?..' ' c 0 -Ne O 0 -C - • ro 1- ...,./1 H. a irst-time visitor, Tukwila-Southoen • a e and adds to the I observations. • • • t- 0 ro 00 > 0 00 4-, C -0 0 Cj 00 ▪ 0 C 0 (0)0. %.- > a 0.. > 0 >,. 0 _c 0 v, -.-, >... ,- E c ad r51 v 17 .5,-4 a) c c re. r-• 0 whether Southeenter itself is 00 a.) rG 00 Ion 0 t.d ro ro 0) L. _C 44 0 -E tr 0 0 0 ‘40- 0- E 0 v _C C 42 eto O an 0) CL • E • • CL 00 0 0 _C 42 -C 44 Lfl Id Mall which ted navigational aids. As web feedback states, 'it is easy to E ro 00 -- 0 toz c ro tO P 17:1 rtl 0) 4.4 74, O 33 yfinding and Sig c z 34 E c 167, 2 roc o_ Lc° roc 31 31 76 1.71 rcl o itical to visitor ..1r7D 3) bO 3) E cu '3 rD C.+ (3 3) 0 _c a) _c -o 3) E E LJ >, _c >. (11 - 0 4C 3)0 a.) a) c rD hi) ID es. '17 E -co 3)0 E 0 4) H _c To 5 E 3)0 ro ."_ .2 0 -13 To. ro v :c4 E vi -C L" 2 ..0 _0 3)13 E o o L- 0 r• (9 0- E ›. 6 7zi 0 '3) .z to a "EL co Q) L° E E (3 co _0 7=1 ao 'E E 0 `t4c E ai co ro 7- -0 0,) rr1 (13 ro (33 kr, ID C 0 -0 4- 3) Main Freeway Signage 4-, 4-• CU oo 0 c >, > E IL V Q./ on CJ 7o. 0_ a rLD -0 r, 3(3 C ID rt3 7 I-- 0: Major Improvement _C 'DT) 3) t,_ _C -d 3) >13 a) 5 3)0 21- -1z] _C cu C la) C C 0 ? 33)3) Improvement Vehicular Directional (1) 4-, 4, 0 C Major Improvement 30 r o LA. '3 2 31) 3) 31 E i5 a) E _c ro t' _c .,-, 0 0 'TO ''''' ••••• C = C ra ' 01 12; C LA M C '1.71 1.71 rD '-0 CU 47 _0 0 ,E5 --"L -Y CO C 0 E on ° Q) 0 0 LA v 0_ 2 -C., L- .,- D 0 4- 0 ('3.--/ 0 4— 4-, -0 (3) 0 ra C.) 0 0 _c 0, a) .,,.... -co >. cu ac co Minor improvement Business Signage -C cL3 4,7 0 roach here — where possible would heir). jor Improvement 3,1 311 30 r o 3) _0 -0 0 39tj 35 36 4_J c E 0_ > 0 cu c 0 ro la) bO c a3 bfl c .(.7) a) 13.0 C+7 0 07 (75 100111133a464Nwn low ,ktMCgAn n'tait Design Development Documentation Lh. N.4 a) tan 0 o:) rication and 37 38 39 Wayfinding Signage c 147-; w L_ Li c 4— +—) 0 $50K to 100K (subject to scope • co cu 4J 0 _0 cL LE 00 cu L.9 0 —J 06tr a) CO 4J 0 0 >• 0 CU s- u_ CC1 40 Wayfinding Signage AC Member(s) Arts Commission Public Works Parks Department a +-, c a) E a_ 0 cu > cu cn 4J C E E 0 u Business Reps m x 41 • a) to co c 00 0 -o 0 D u_ 2 x (t3 0 1-- elo _c c v) bl) + , z tap C - 0 a5 0 o _c _1 0 1— ut Pk (1, 4-, cuu 0 o_ 4-d a) a)E 2> 0 E To + -, O 3 4J cu E 0 0 (1) > CL) -0 CD CC 0 C 0 U CO X LLJ ut C 0 IP = -0 ' E 4-, 0 U (1) 4, CO > Pk L_ a) -5 42 (1) CD +-a (1) SLJ)3 0— co E Q) U v) OD C 14- a) c X L_ (1) CO g Z . Brief City Cou E E Ls -0 0 0 LL CC LL CC b E 2 tiO La u_ CI) - C a) 0 U 43 Wayfinding Signage c 0 11 v) a) Ci 44 City of Tukwila '''1,r0ZAA t.`,411 INFOR ATIONAL E ORANDU TO: FROM: Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: September 17, 2019 SUBJECT: Lodging Tax Six Year Funding Model ISSUE Discussion and review of Lodging Tax Six Year Financial Model and ending fund balance goals. BACKGROUND Allan Ekberg, Mayor Community Development and Neighborhoods The City collects a 1% lodging tax on certain qualifying overnight stays in paid accommodations (hotels/motels/Airbnb) in the City. State law limits the use of these funds to tourism promotionl. There is currently just over $1 million in lodging tax funds available for use. By 2024 the ending fund balance is expected to be near $2.5 million based on current expenditures. Lodging tax funds are collected in order to be invested in the community to invest in the City's tourism economy. The goal is drive economic activity by bring visitors to the City, both day and overnight visitors. State Law provides strict guidance on how lodging tax funds can be used. The funds cannot be used for basic governmental operations. DISCUSSION The City's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) has worked on a proposed financial model for the City's lodging tax fund. In the past, the City reviewed lodging tax applications and, assuming they met the applicable criteria, approved request, provided funding was available. The goal of using a financial model is to ensure the funds are used in a strategic manner and that funds are set aside for possible future activities that could be funded with lodging tax funds. The activities listed in the attached excel spreadsheet are "big bucket" items and were developed by staff and LTAC. The list can be updated on a regular basis and staff is seeking additional guidance on the list. There are several projects worth highlighting: 1 RCW 67.28.080 (6) defines "tourism promotion" as "...activities, operations, and expenditures designed to increase tourism, including but not limited to advertising, publicizing, or otherwise distributing information for the purpose of attracting and welcoming tourists; developing strategies to expand tourism; operating tourism promotion agencies; and funding the marketing of or the operation of special events and festivals designed to attract tourists." 45 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 1. Tukwila Pond Tukwila Pond provides an opportunity for the City todevelop ocenterpiece park within the C#v'SGouthoenterDistrict. Not only would the development h8good for residents, but the Pond could also tie into the Cih/otourist experience. Aboardwalk could be developed for hotel guests to utilize for exercise; areas could be developed as gathering spaces; and the Pond could attract small scale 'festivals and events. The City Council, with a recommendation from LTAC, has allocated $100,000 of lodging tax funds to develop omaster plan for the Pond. The financial model proposes $85OOOOoflodging taxfundnbaoUocotedtothePond Ulrough2O24. Additional funds would have tObe secured for construction and lodging tax funds could be used as matching funds for the City to obtain grants. 2. 8oudhcentorArt Investment Art can be used to improve the overall visual appearance of a tourist destination. Additionally, art can beused as adraw for aplace and used for branding purposes (think the Fremont Troll). Parks and Recreation is currently working on an art installation and art plan for Baker Blvd in the Southcenter District, funded by lodging tax. Staff envisions art could be extended to other areas of the Southoenter District. The financial model ioenvisioning that $415]}OObeallocated hoart installation in Southcenter over the next six years. 3. Small Event Development and Support The financial model is budgeting $90,000 over the next six years to support small event development and support citywide. Staff's goal is to provide an avenue for groups to get access to small lodging tax grants for small scale activities that could be used to develop authentic, Tukwila experiences. FINANCIAL IMPACT N/A. The financial model does not authorize any expenditure. All expenditures oflodging tax funds arerequired to go through the City's formal application process, with review by LTAC and the City Council. LTAC and staff are proposing that the City strive to never let the ending fund balance gobelow $4OO.00OiMany year. RECOMMENDATION Discussion Only. ATTACHMENTS A. Lodging Tax, Guiding Principle #1 B. Lodging Tax Six Year Financial Model Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Guiding Principle #1 Six Year Financial and Ending Fund Balance Topic: Guidance on financial modeling and ending fund balance. Background: The City of Tukwila (the "City") collects a 1% charge on eligible lodging stays at area hotels, motels and Airbnbs. Under Washington State law these funds can only be used for tourism promotion activities. Any request to lodging tax funds is reviewed by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) and, if LTAC recommends approval, is forward to the Tukwila City Council for final review and action. The City is projecting a significant ending fund balance for 2019 and 2020. In order to provide strategic direction on the use of funds, LTAC is proposing that a six -year funding model be maintained showing possible future uses of lodging tax funds. The goal is to ensure that as applications come in the LTAC consider the request in a strategic context of the City's overall goals and ensure the funds are available in years for the City's priorities. Principle: LTAC will maintain a six -year financial model outlining anticipated revenue and anticipated expenditures. The expenditures are concept only and at a very high level. The model provides no approval to expend any of the funds listed. Any request to use funds require going through the formal application process. Furthermore, the financial model will strive to ensure that the forecasted ending fund balance in any year not be below $400,000. The goal with keeping this minimum ending fund balance is to provide significant amount of funds that could be used during an economic downturn or to take advantage of a major opportunity. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 47 48 DRAFT, DISCUSSION ONLY a Lodging Tax Six Year Financia Forecasted Approved Applications Ln 0 n Lr) O � H Ln in 0 C O 01 0 0 ri m N N O rn 0 00 0 N N O 00 0 0 O ri O oo N oo 0 O 0 O N 0 O CO N O 0 0 Lri N N tn. Lodging Tax Collection c L 0000 0000 0 m m 0 tD 0000 0000 00 O1 N 0 01 0000 0000 00 Ln 00 O N Ln O O Ln Ln Ln 0 Ln Ln Lr) .-1 Ln m r-1 O O1 L-1 N ri Ln N L( r-I N 00 ri N 01 m lD d- 01 c-1 m r-I c-1 ri in ri Ln tn. t!} t/} t/} i/} ih t/)- t/} t/} t/) t/ - t/)• t/} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N CO 0 m r-I d- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N Ln 0 l0 't 00 Ln 0 0 0 0000 LID N 00 0 N CY 0 Ni . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Ln O O Ln O O m 0 .-1 O 00 01 m O in r-1 in O N co Ln l0 N N m N N N N r-1 r 1 N 01 N N t/> t/)• t/> -VI- t/) t/)• t/? t/} t/} t/} t/)• if) th th tn- 0000 0000 m 00 tD O 00 01 r-1 0000 0000 m r-1 ri o l0 O d- Ln 0 0 0 0000 00 ri N 0 (.0 0 d- N O Ln O O Ln O O .-i O ri O Ln O1 O1 O Ln r-1 Ln O N O Lr) l0 N N m N N- N N ri ri N 01 N. N t/} i/i t/)• {h th t/)- i/I• tn- i/} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 00 0 m N 01 0000 0000 m m CO O t0 N 0 Ln 0 0 0 0000 0 Ln Ln co l0 cD 0 N O Lri O O Lr1 O O O cm.' O O N' 0i 0i 0 Ln ri Ln o N 0 t l0 ri N m t.0 VI N N ri ri N 01 oo N t/} t/) t/} i/} t/} th t/)- t/} t/} t/} t/} t/} t!} t/} t/} 0 0 0 0 0000 d' m 00 o in N N 0000 0000 00 l0 01 0 d' r•1 N Ln O O O 0000 N 01 01 0 N d- lD N O Ln O O Ln O O 00 00 0, O 0, 01 cr O LP) ri Ln Ln N O N in ri c-1 m 00 0 Lr) N ri ri N 01 0 00 ri t/> t/)• t/)• t/)• t/)- t/)• t/)- t/} t/) t/l• t/> th th t/> t/} 0000 0000 tD ri Up O m O N 0000 0000 00 ri -1 0 ri CO ri Ln 0 0 0 0000 Ln dco 01 m d- N O Lri O O Ln Lr1 Ln LO co- 01 O t0 l0 cr O Ln r-1 Ln Ln N . N r•I Ln r-1 ri CO Ln l0 O Ni ri ri CO 0 0 ri ri t/)- t/)• t/} if)- -VI- t/) t/) t/) t/) t/)• t/)• th VI- VI- t/? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N ri o in in o coop o 0 o Ln d- d- o d- NN m Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' d- 00 N o Ln oo m Ni O Ln Ln Ln 0 Ln L, N 00 in' 01 0 L O Ln ri l0 N - f N- Ln ri r-1 (C d' d' co N ri N O O -1 r-1 t/} t/)- t/} 4.4 t/} 4" t/)• t/} t/} t/} t/} t/)- t/)• t/)- t/} 0 0 0 0 0 Lrl cr d' 0 00000L Ln O Ln ' ' O O ' •:t 00 N O O N d' N O O Lrl N 00 Ln Lc' O d- ri d' co in ri ci m N N r-1 ri cD Contracted DMO Services t/). t/). tn. ih th to to 0 LL.a1 C c„ - C >- N 0) VI O +, 0 c c .0 ro v= L110 QJ VI N Q Q t0 O d ro @ 47, C co ) 7 N r0 a) (0 > N O) U Q O C C 0) Q 0) C rn� ra a _C0 +-' 4, c C L 'N asL f0 > (L0 a) O F c a oo O ' (0 1 N >, c >> o � a o u a a)CL 0 p O > 0_ aJ 7 7 0. O w �> L c LLJ Li ro O O ro o ro E ro c in tuo c/1 c c C Qr0 5 a L Total Expenditures Ln m CO m 0000 o d 0 0 u u c c CO r0 i- ro ro co c0 cD 4-; >> L -7 0) asc 00 a) a) 7 Q. LJ- OA C C -p m L +l , (011 CO c 0 W °0 0) f0 L U N ro C i >. O +.+ L +, as E a) v -a a� o >, a a) o a) p E Z v_, 1? rn N o 0) v, v, r0 O 0 * NJ CV m L v, N N E^i, O — 7 0 L -O O N O 0) 7 0 0) N CU E (v, Q L o 0„„ v 0 ( v 7 7 — ate_, U C C 01 0) c- a1 > > f0 0J a) ro vcc cc Ln co ication process. OA 0 v v r0 CO CO a) vi 0) U 0) H vi (1) ro 0) u c N s c r0 c Lab 0 0) 0 a Q 0 c v- co 0) c 0) 00 0) s a- O O v 0) +J v, O_ O v a) c ro c 7 0 U U ro (0 0 0) Q co 0 0) 00 L U 0) ro t 0 v a) a-+ L ro a) > 0_ O� 49 50 City f Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor V F �0~~ u0_m TO: Community Development and Neighborhoods Committee FROM: Minnie C)heJhma|,Planning [Supervisor BY: Meredith Sampson, Assistant Planner CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: September 24'2O13 SUBJECT: HB1923Increasing Housing Supply and Affordability ISSUE Does Tukwila want to apply for a grant which could provide up to $100,000 in funds to the City to take actions to increase housing supply and affordability? BACKGROUND The State legislature passed HB 1923 providing $5 million to inCPB8Se residential building capacity in Washington COmO1UOiM8S. The Department of Commerce has released @ grant application, due September 3Om .2019'fo[Upto|$100000 perjurisdiction. These funds can b8 pDtf0Vverd Certain zoning achOMs, or toward a Housing Action Plan. The goal of plan developed using this funding source "must befo encourage construction ofadditional affordable and market rate housing in a greater variety of housing types and at prices that are accessible to 8greater variety Of iOcoDleS, including strategies 8i0n8d at the for -profit single-family home market." There are seven sub -components that must be included in the plan. DISCUSSION Staff are considering Tuhvv|e'ooptions for this funding opportunity. TheCOOQeotof8sub- regional housing plan is being explored with neighboring South King County jurisdictions. This would involve each jurisdiction submitting their own grant application to the Department of Commerce. Several of the Housing Action Plan criteria outlined in HB 1923 are better served by looking atthe 'broader area of South King County an 8vvhn|a` South King County has similarities across jurisdictions, yet isunique when compared toSeattle PrEast King County and addressing trends across the area will beonasset for each jurisdiction. Other Housing Action Plan criteria outlined in HB 1923 VvMU|d be better researched at the individual city scale. Staff would like to focus the Tukwila -specific portion of the Housing Action Plan On our transit oriented development (T[l-) zone and OO TUkV»i|8 International BDU|eV8rd` This will give US 8 chance to study the housing supply surrounding Tukwila International Boulevard Station as well as the effects of displacement around transit C8nhBrS. FINANCIAL IMPACT No financial match needed. Staff time will be needed to manage the grant. RECOMMENDATION The Committee is being asked to approve the City to apply for this grant. ATTACHMENTS MR8C Handout Department nfCommerce HB1S25Informational Sheet 51 52 MRSC - New Bill Provides Incentives for Washington Cities to Increase Residential Capacity 9/17orpg New Bill Provides Incentives for Washington Cities to Increase Residential Capacity July 26, 2019 by Steve Butler Category: Housing , New Legislation and Regulations, Development Regulations and Zoning ro444:s.V.;.. Nat& tv,v4zat,frto Ziot, / Most people would agree that affordable housing is a major issue throughout the state of Washington. There is much less agreement, 11 however, on what is needed to t address this problem. Recognizing this quandary, the Washington Legislature passed a bill (E2SHB 1923) to help address the affordable housing issue, which was signed by the Governor and takes effect on July 28, 2019 (with one provision that became effective on July1, 2019). While it doesn't have the mandates included in the original version, E2SHB 1923 is intended to encourage more residential development capacity and increase local governments' emphasis on affordable housing by providing both monetary and non -monetary incentives to do so. The bill focuses primarily on cities with populations of more than 20,000, with those cities needing to take formal action — as outlined in the bill — by April 1, 2021, in order to participate. Why Your City Shoutd Participate E2SHB 1923 outlines two major incentives to induce cities to participate; funding and protection against State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and/or Growth Management Act (GMA) appeats in certain cases. Planning grants Eligible cities may receive up to $100,000 in grant funds from the Washington Department of Commerce if they commit to adopting at least two actions that are intended to increase local residential capacity (which are summarized in this btog post) or if they develop a Housing Action Plan. Again, cities will need to act by Aprill, 2021. Applications for the grant funds will be available in mid -August and right now are expected to be due by September 30, 2019! Protection against SEPA and GMA appeals in certain cases 53 Cities adopting the actions specified in the new law (except for adoption of a subarea p(an) will not be subject to SEPA appeal. The same protection applies to GMA-related appeals to the Growth Management Hearings Boards for any comprehensive plan amendments or development regulations related to the 12 regulatory actions listed in E2SHB 1923. Both provisions apply to relevant actions taken between July 28, 2019 and April 1, 2021. What Your City Must Do to Participate Cities are eligible for the planning grants and "safe harbor" appeal provisions described above if they adopt two or more of twelve actions listed in the legislation, and which can be broken into Local Regulatory Changes (nine total) and/or SEPA-Related Changes (three total). Local regulatory changes 1. Increase development capacity to 50 units per acre or more near commuter or light rail stations (for a designated area of at least 500 acres). 2. Increase development capacity to 25 units per acre or more near high frequency bus stops (for a designated area of either: 250+ acres for cities with less than 40,000 population or 500+ acres for cities with populations over 40,000). 3. Allow a duplex, triplex, or courtyard apartment on all parcels in a zoning district where single- amity homes are permitted. 4. Allow cluster zoning or lot size averaging in all zoning districts where single-family homes are permitted. 5. Expand allowances for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) with specific code provisions that extend beyond what is currently required by Washington State law. 6. Establish a form -based code. 7. Allow a duplex on all corner lots in single-family zones. 8. Establish the optional maximum thresholds under the short subdivision process. 9. Establish a minimum net density of six dwelling units per acre. SEPA-related changes 1. Develop and adopt a subarea plan, using the "planned action" provisions, for an area that is designed as a mixed - use or urban center or leverages proximity to a major transit stop, transit infrastructure, or regional center. 2. Develop and adopt a SEPA planned action that includes residential or mixed -use development. 3. Use the SEPA infill exemption authority to increase categorical exemption thresholds for residential, mixed -use, or commercial development in areas that do not meet the planned density. A local government needs to commit to adopting at least two of the items listed above by Aprill, 2021 in order to participate in the grant program. Housing Action Plan: Another Eligible Activity A city that that develops and adopts a Housing Action Plan may also apply for a state grant. Such a plan must "encourage construction of additional affordable and market rate housing in a greater variety of housing types and at prices that are accessible to a greater variety of incomes" and should undertake the following tasks: 54 • Quantify existing and project housing needs for all income levels; • Develop strategies to increase the supply of housing and variety of housing types; • Analyze population and employment trends, with documentation of projections; • Consider strategies to minimize displacement of low-income residents; • Review and evaluate the current element adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070: • Provide for broad participation and input from all interested parties; and • Include a schedule of implementation programs and actions. Other Notable Aspects of the Bill The bill provides several useful definitions related to housing costs. The term "affordable housing" is clearly defined as "residential housing whose monthly costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30% of the monthly income of a household," and then it draws clear distinctions between renters and homeowners. For rental housing, the targeted monthly income level is defined as 60% of the county median household income, adjusted for household size. For owner -occupied housing, the level is 80% of the county median household income once adjusted for household size. In addition, there are specific percentages for what constitutes low, very low, and extremely low-income households, as the table below demonstrates: Definition Low-income household Very low-income household Extremely low-income household Median Household Income (MHI) less than 80% of the MHI less than 50% of the MHI less than 30% of the MHI E2SHB 1923 also contains a number of other provisions, including: • A reduction in local residential parking requirements for developments with good transit service that house very low-income or extremely low-income households, seniors, or people with disabilities; • An exemption from SEPA appeals related to transportation impacts for residential and mixed -use developments; • A ban on prohibiting "permanent supportive housing" in areas where multi -family housing is allowed; and • For cities with a population greater than 5,000, a SEPA appeat exemption for developments that sets aside or requires the low-income household occupancy of at least 10% of its dwelling units. For more details about E2SHB 1923 and the associated state grant program, please read the Increasing Residential Bulk:ling Capacity - E2SHB 1923 Grant Opportunity Overview, which was prepared by the Washington State Department of Commerce's Growth Management Services -Local Government Division. MRSC is a private nonprofit organization serving local governments in Washington State. Eligible government agencies in Washington State may use our free, one-on-one Ask MRSC service to get answers to legal, policy, or financial questions. 55 About Steve Butler Steve joined MRSC in February 2015. He has been involved in most aspects of community planning for over 30 years, both in the public and private sectors. He received a B.A. from St. Lawrence University (Canton, New York) and a M.S. in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Wisconsin -Madison. Steve has served as president of statewide planning associations in both Washington and Maine, and was elected to the American Institute of Certified Planner's College of Fellows in 2008. VIEW ALL POSTS BY STEVE BUTLER © 2019 MRSC of Washington. Alt rights reserved. Privacy & Terms. mr6c6rg/Home/Stay-Informed/MRSC-Insight/July-2019/Incentives-for-Increased-Residential-CaPacity.asPx 4/4 Department of Commerce Increasing Residential Building Capacity E2SHB 1923 Eligible Activities and Frequently Asked Questions about the Grant IM111, evise,,* as of Se#teJni4er5i2*19 Growth Management Services Local Government Division E2SH01923 pronided-$5million koincrease residential building capacity in Washington communities. These funds are prioritized inthe bill for the 53GK8A cities over 20,00Oin population. These are the steps in implementation. SURVEY: Commerce developed a Grant Opportunity Interest Survey which includes questions about the various eligible activities and which options these cities are likely to pursue if they apply for grant funding. Commerce will use this to make decisions about the grant. GRANT APPLICATION: A grant application will be released on August 15, 2019, and will be due toCommerce bySeptember ][L2O19. Awards will bemade bvthe end ofOctober. Grant funded actions must beadopted byApril 1,2OI2. LIST OFELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES: This list isdefined inthe bill. Commerce has provided some additional guidance toclarify some questions. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Commerce has received anumber ofquestions about this grant opportunity. VVehave compiled ansxversbaSedonourana|ysesotthe|e8b|aUnnandnur development of the grant program to date. These start on page 9 of this document. Commerce contacts: Dave Andersen, GK8SManaging Director/ Project Lead^(SO9)434-4491 Anne Fritze|,Senior Planner, Project Technical Assistance /36[A725'3064 Paul Johnson, GyNSGrants Coordinator, (]6O)7IS-3O48 57 eligibleActivities g 1. Select at ye^ns* two of the actions listed below: m) Increase residential density near commuter orlight rail stations tm50dwelling units per acre. Designated areas should bewt least 500mcmes in size. This may beachieved msasub-area plan orrezone within adesignated area in response to oranticipation ofcommuter orlight rail stations. Regulations should allow at |east5O dwelling units per acre, and must require no more than an average of one on -site parking space per two bedrooms in multifamily areas. The plan should consider all areas with a half mile, or1O'nninute walk, ofthe station, Special attention should be paid to prioritize bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access to station areas. 6J Increase residential density along high frequency transit corridors to25 dwelling units per acre. Designated areas should bemtleast 250acres for cities with a population of less than 40,000 people, or 500 acres for cities with opopulation over 40,000. This may achieved as a sub -area plan or rezone along a transit corridor in response to or in anticipation ofhigh frequency transit corridors. E2SH8l923defines "hkzhfrequency transit service" ogbus service utleast four times per hour, at/eost22hoursperdoy. Regulations should allow at least 25 dVVe|UnQ units per acre, and must require no more than an average of one on -site parking space per two bedrooms in multifamily areas. The plan should consider all areas with a half mile, or 10'nninutevva|k, of the transit corridor, with special attention toconsiderations for road crossings totransit service. 6 Authorize at least one duplex, triplex, or courtyard apartment wneach parcel inone m' more zoning districts that permit sinresidences unless ocity documents specific infrastructure or physical constraint that would make this requirement unfeasible for a particular parcel. Documentation of specific infrastructure or physical constraints should go beyond whether sewer orother services currently exist atthe location. Documentation should describe how specific geographic features of the land, such as water bodies or critical areas make it extremely difficult to develop, or to serve isolated parcels with urban services. dU Authorize cluster zoning orlot size averaging hoall zoning districts that permit singlefamily residences; - 2 0D-0D,28l9 Cluster zoning is a zoning method in which development density is determined for an entire specified area, rather than on a lot -by -lot basis. Within the specified cluster zone, a developer can exercise greater flexibility in designing and placing structures, as long as the total density requirement ismet. Lot size averaging a|kxwsthesbeofindividua/kltsvvithinadeve|npnnenttovaryfronnthe zoned maximum density, provided that the average lot size in the development as a whole meets that maximum. Housing can then be developed on lots smaller than otherwise permitted in a zone, allowing for greater densities in some areas and more diversity throughout the development. These tools can be especially useful in lands encumbered by critical areas or other constraints that point to a more flexible approach. e/ Authorize accessory dwelling units on all parcels containing single-family homes where the lot /smfleast 3,200 square feet in size, and permit both attached and detached ADUs onall parcels containing sinhomes, provided lots are at least 4,3S6square feet in size. Qualifying city ordinances or regulations may not provide for on - site parking requirements, owner occupancy requirements, or square footage limitations below 1,000 squmrefeetforthe accessory dwelling unit, and must not prohibit the separate rental wrsale ofaccessory dwelling units and the primary residence. Cities must set applicable inpmctfecsmtnmmore than the projected impact ofthe accessory 'dwelling unit. 7mallow local flexibility, other than these factors, accessory dwelling units may be subject tosuch regulations, conditions, procedures, and limitations as determined by the local legislative mudhority, and nnwstfmNmm/all applicable state mmdfedpro/laws and local ordinances. GMA cities over 20,000 in population are already required to allow accessory dwelling units (ADUs)insingle family zones.' Tobeeligible for funding under E2SHBl923,eligible jurisdictions must adopt an ADU ordinance that is consistent with these specifications for lot size, unit size, no parking requirement, no owner occupancy requirement, reduced impact fees, and subsequent separate sale ofseparate units. Please note thephrase "both attached and |detached ADQs°onall parcels over 4'3S6 square feet means allowing .two '(J) 4[xQs per lot. Beyond these items, local governments may choose towaive utility connection fees, building or permit fees, oraddress design. For more information please review NYRS[,sguidance onthis topic, except that the l9g4CTED/\DUguidance is superseded bythese requirements. fl Adopt msubarea plan pursuant buRCW43.21C.420. `See RCW3670A400and RCW 43.63A2l5(B(laws oD993) 3 O8-O5'2Ol9 59 From R[VV43.2l[.43O: Cities with a population greater than 5,000 may adopt optional elements of comprehensive plans and optional development regulations that apply within subareas for areas that are either: a. Areas designated as mixed use or urban centers in a land use or transportation plan adopted by regional transportation planning organization; or b. Areas within one half mile ofa major transit stop, zoned for anaverage rnininnunn density uf1Sunits per gross acre. Section 3ofRCVV43'21C.42Odefines amajor transit stop as: • A stop on a high capacity transportation service funded or expanded under RCW 81.104; • Commuter rail stops; � Stops onrail orfixed guideway systems, including transitvvays; w Stops on bus rapid transit routes or routes that run on high-occupancyvehiclelanes; or � Stops for g bus or other transit mode providing fixed route service at intervals of at least thirty minutes during the peak hours ofoperation. The plan must be accompanied by an environmental impact statement (EIS) assessing and disclosing the probable significant adverse environmental impacts. Any development proposed within 10 years of the EIS, which is consistent with the plan and regulations may not bechallenged under 5EPA.z Adopt planned action pursuant tmRC0y43.21C. A planned action is an adopted plan and environmental review on a sub -area within an urban growth area, consistent with a comprehensive plan adopted under the Growth Management Act. The plan and environmental review are completed before projects are proposed. Project -level significant impacts must be addressed in a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)document, unless the impacts are specifically deferred for consideration ot the project level. The SEPAdocument may beadetermination ofnon-significance (DN5),a mitigated determination of significance (MDNS), or an environmental impact statement EIS). To be eligible for funding, the planned action area should: w 8ewithin anurban growth area; * Contain mixed use orresidential development; and • Encompass anarea that iswithin one-half mile ofomajor transitstopa ;orvviUbewithin one-half mile of a major transit stop no later than five years from the date of the designation oythe planned action. Section SofRCVV43,31C.44Odefines amajor transit stop as a commuter rail stop, a stop on a rail or fixed guideway or transitway system, or 28ee RCW 43.21C,420(amended by E2SHBl923,laws of20l9) 4 O8-O5'2Ol9 a stop on a high capacity transportation service funded or expanded under chapter 8I`104RCVV.4 For more information see http://mrsc.org/HoVre-Topics/Plannid-Use- Adnninistratiun/P|anned-Action`aspx. hJ Adopt ominfill exemption under RCW4�21C.229forresidential ormixed-us development This section allows for exemptions from 5EPAevaluation if the city oronunty'sapplicable comprehensive plan was previously subjected to environmental analysis and if the local government considers the specific probable adverse environmental impacts of the proposed action and determines they are adequately addressed by the development regulations or other requirements. Such an exemption categorically exempts government action related to development proposed to fill in an urban growth area, where current density and intensity of use in the area islower than called for in the goals and policies of the applicable comprehensive plan and the development is either (i) Residential development, (ii) Mixed -use development, or (iii) Commercial development up to 65,000 square feet, excluding retail development. It does not exempt government action related todevelopment that isinconsistent with the applicable comprehensive plan or would exceed the density or intensity of use called for in the comprehensive plan. Guidance on infill development is available from the Department of Ecology's SEPA Guidance websiteathttps://ecologv.wa.ecologv.wa.gov/Regulations- Perm its/S EPA/Envi ronmenta|-revimw/SEPA-guidance and look for the link tothe 2017 SEPAHandbonk. i) Adopt msed code [none mrmore zoning districts that permit residential uses. "Form-bosedcode" means mland development regulation that /uses phrather than separation of use, as the organizing principle for the code; The purpose ofaform-based code istocontrol the size and bulk ofbuildings, instead of regulating bythe number ofunits. This can help alocal government encourage development that meets the desired community character, but encourages a greater number of units of a given parcel, as the number of units are not restricted. For more information see mrsc.oru/H0nneyExporc' onn/nclDev2/oornent-7ypes-ond-lond- Lbes/Fnnn-8osed-[Udes. "QCW8[ln4authorizes specific sources of funding. If the major transit stop does not meet the other descriptions, refer oothis section o£statute for asection that authorizes the funding for the transportation serving the "major transit stop." O8'05'20l9 61 ) Authorize duplex moeach comer lot within all zoning districts that permit sin A duplex on a corner lot can have the advantage of looking like a single-family housing unit with afront-facing door oneach corner. This approach can add density insingle-family areas without appearing toadd atraditional duplex, but provides the benefit ofadditional smaller units which can be more affordable. Ad Allow for the division wrrediwisiw mƒland into the maximum number mf lots through the short subdivision process provided 8vchapter 58.17 RCW; RCW 58.17.020(6) defines a short subdivision as "the division or re -division of land into four orfewer lots, tracts parcels, sites, ordivisions for the purpose ofsale, lease, ortransfer of ownership. However, the legislative authority of any city or town may by local ordinance increase the number of lots, tracts, or parcels to be regulated as short subdivisions to a maximum ofnine. This applies inall cities and for counties within urban growth areas. By increasing the number of lots in short plat, more development may be permitted by the quicker short plat process, which can be processed administratively, rather than the longer subdivision process, which generally requires approval ofthe legislative body. Local governments may also wish to review RCVVS8.17.IUUwhich allows for delegation offinal plat approval to the planning commission or staff rather than going back to council. 8 Authorize ominimum net density of six dwelling units per acre /nall residential zones, where the residential developmentcapacity will increase within the city. This option isapplicable where net density inresidential zones isless than six dwelling units per acre. Net density isthe gross acreage minus public rightofways, divided bvthe number of units. Where areas are encumbered by critical areas, clustering can help achieve the target density. 2. Cities may adopt aHousing Action Plan The goal ofany such housing plan must be/toencourage construction ofadditional affordable and market rate housing 07ogreater variety of housing types and otprices that are accessible to a greater variety of incomes, including strategies aimed at the for -profit single-family home market. The housing action plan should: &6 Quantify existing andprojected housing needs for all income levels, including extremely low-income households, �with documentation mfhousing and household characteristics, and cost -burdened households; O8'O5-2Ol9 62 Data should document the type and age of housing within the community, and the demographics ofthe households within the communities. |tshould look across income segments and identify how many households in each income segment are paying more than SOpercent oftheir income for housing costs. The analysis should also project popu|otion demographics and income levels for the planning period and identify the types and densities of housing that are needed for housing suitable and affordable for all demographic and economic segments. This analysis should specifically consider multifamily and attached housing types. For more information see VVAC365 196'4I0. (b) Develop strategies tmincrease the supply ofhousing, and variety mfhousing types, needed to serve the housing needs identified in (a) of this subsection; Data gathered inthe previous section should point tothe types ofhousing that should be allowed bylocal zoning, and the types ofincentives and regulations that will beneeded to encourage the development of appropriate housing affordable to all income segments of the community. Trade-offs inparking requirements, setbacks, and open space considerations may bereviewed asthey affect the yield inhousing. Strategies toencourage and support the development of subsidized housing, such as fee waivers and free land should beconsidered, 'along with options for creating more housing. For afull menu Df strategies, see vxvxov.ezVigVv.wva.goV (Affordable Housing Planning Resources). Policy actions can be evaluated on the whether they are short term, or long term, how effective they are, orwhether they have afiscal impact. (c) Analyze population and employment trends, with documentation of Population analysis should consider the citv'sportion ofthe countywide popu|aUon allocation projected over the 20-year planning period, along with regional population trends. Employment trends should look at the jobs in the region, along with the income levels of the jobs, and may consider the jobs/housing balance in the community. This analysis should be considered with the analysis of housing needs in part (a) of this section. (d) Consider strategies to minimize displacementof low-incomeresidents resulting from Economic displacement ovhene��ncome��den�a���do�oft�c��na| occu low-cost areas as redevelopment occurs and rents rise. Strategies to minimize displacement include preserving existing affordable housing, encouraging greater housing development, including, but not limited to affordable housing (so more housing is available for all income segnngnts),using collective ownership ofhousing, engaging existing residents |nidentifying strategies, and taking a broader look using regional rather than localized strategies. For 7 08-05-2019 63 more information consider US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) resources such as: www.huduser.qovlportallsitesldefaultlfileslpdfIDisplacementReport.pdf (e) Review and evaluate the current housing element adopted pursuant boRCW 36.70A.070, including onevaluation of success in attaining planned housing types and units, achievement of goals and policies, and implementation ofthe schedule ofprograms and actions; A0 The housing element of the comprehensive plan should be evaluated for how well development isimplementing policies, specifically whether the community isontrack to accommodate the portion ofthe countywide population allocated tVthe community within the planning period, and whether the housing types are affordable to all economic segments. If these metrics are not met, new comprehensive plan policies should be proposed to support zoning that allow the size and types of housing that can be affordable tomost economic segments ofthe population. Policies may also encourage orincentivize the development of subsidized affordable housing. Action strategies or housing metrics can help the plan stay ontrack over time. Provide for participation amdinpwtfrom community members, community groups, local builders, local remltors,monpnofit housing advocates, and local religious groups; and Broad participation from all parts of the community can help to understand and communicate the housing need. Members ofthe public can provide information and perspective on how the community can meet the state requirements to plan for housing affordable toall economic segments. (g)Include a schedule mfprograms and actions fm implementthe recommendations of the housing action plan. The housing action plan should cumulate in a broad array of potential programs and actions that the jurisdiction has committed to pursue, or can partner with other organizations to implement. The actions should include anupdate topolicies inthe comprehensive plan, along with actions to update regulations to implement selected strategies. The schedule should include a timeline for actions and funding, if required to implement the plan. Actions protected from appeal |fadopted between July 20,2Olgand April 1,3U2l ordinances, amendments todevelopment regulations, and other nonproject actions taken by a city are not subject to administrative or judicial appeal under the State Environmental Policy Act (5FPA).1 This excludes the adoption of asub-area plan adopted pursuant toRCVV43.2lC.42D. M O8-05'20l9 64 In addition, any action taken by a city prior to April 1, 2021 to amend their comprehensive plan, or adopt or amend ordinances or development regulations to enact any of the twelve actions to increase residential building capacity is not subject to appeal to the Growth Management Hearings Boards.' 1. When will the grant application be available? Grant information is available on https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving- cornmunities/growth-management/growth-management-grants/ about two programs. Applications for cities over 20,000 population are due September 30, 2019. Applications for cities under 20,000 are due October 15, 2019. 2. How much detail are you expecting in the survey comment boxes for code citations. Is there a word or letter count that we need to comply with? Title and section citations of the city code are sufficient. We are looking for enough information to find the applicable section of your city code. Survey Monkey sets a limit of 100 characters for a single line of text. 3. What was the effective date of HB 1923? July 28, 2019. A city may start documenting expenses on specific tasks from the effective date of the bill. This may be billed only if a grant is awarded. Billing may occur only after there is a signed contract, which we expect to occur in November 2019. 4. How long will a city have to spend its funds once awarded? When are the start and end dates? Section 1(6) of E2SHB 1923 states that funding may be provided in advance of, and to support adoption of policies or ordinances consistent with this section. A city may start documenting expenses on specific tasks from the effective date of the bill. This may be billed only if a grant is awarded. Billing may occur only after there is a signed contract, 6E2SHB 1923, Section 1 (4) 9 08-05-2019 65 which mxeexpect tnoccur inNovember ZO19. The end ofthe contract period will beJune 30, 2021, however, eligible actions must be taken (adopted) by April 1, 2021 to receive full funding, and all deliverables must besubnmittedbyJune 15,ZO2l, 5. How will applications beselected for funding through the grant selection process? Commerce will use the survey to develop a strategy to award funds across eligible jurisdictions and consistent with level of effort. Eligible applications will be scored and ranked consistent with scoring criteria, inthe grant applications. ������U����������������������U��� �=~°~~~°..~=."~� ������~�. GRANT FUNDING 1' MaVanother organization apply onbehalf ofaneligible city (or cities) for work under E2SH01923? A third party organization, such as a non-profit or consulting group, may help to develop the application. However, the application would need to have a signed letter from the Mayor of each jurisdiction committing to the work, with the understanding that the city would be the grantee. Commerce would then execute a contract with each city receiving funding, and the third party may be contracted by the city to do the work. 2.The survey used the word "alternatively" but the text of E2SH81923suggests that acity could apply for both if desired. Section I (Subsections 6 & 7) of the bill provide criteria for funding applications. 5ection1(6) states that a city over 20,000 population that takes at least two of the listed actions can apply for $100,000, and may apply for more if the action demonstrates extraordinary potential toincrease housing supply and streamline regulations. Section 1(7) states that a cities can apply for up to $100,000 to develop a housing action plan. Section 1(8) says that Commerce shall establish grant amounts to ensure all cities can receive some level ofgrant support. Asthere are S3jurisdictions eligible for the first round of funding, and only $5 million available, Commerce recommends a city choose one or the other option, or a combination for a maximum ask of $100,000, demonstrating the level of effort required for each action, unless they can make a case for extraordinary potential. 3' What sort mfdocumentation might you be looking for tmsupport anapplication for a grant that exceeds $100,000? 10 O8-05-20l9 An eligible city may request more than $100,000 for applications that demonstrate "extraordinary potential to increase housing supply or regulatory streamlining," such as the following: • A single jurisdiction proposing at least two of the activities and explaining how these actions demonstrate extraordinary potential to increase housing supply or regulatory streamlining (does not include a housing action plan). Transit corridor planning with multiple jurisdictions and tribes, if applicable. Documentation would include the expected extraordinary increase in capacity or streamlining from working together. Housing action plans that cross multiple jurisdictions, and are coordinators for consistency. Documentation would include the expected extraordinary outcomes as a result of working together. Jurisdictions eligible for the first round of funding may apply with ineligible jurisdictions for activities such as regional housing action plans or subarea plans that may cross jurisdictional boundaries, including into unincorporated UGAs. However, funding for ineligible partners may be available at a significantly lower amounts than eligible jurisdictions. Examples of documentation may include the following: If city proposes to adopt actions to increase capacity, it may provide a rough estimate of number of additional units that may be produced over the 20-year period as a result of these actions, including the assumptions used in the estimate, and how these numbers are extraordinary, compared to existing plans and regulations, or to other similar jurisdictions. If a city proposes permit streamlining, documentation may include an estimate of the number and percentage of units that the proposed tool(s) may potentially streamline within the jurisdiction, and how this might be extraordinary compared to normal course of business or other similar jurisdictions. 4. If a city has a population of only 5,000 residents, which is below the established threshold of 20,000, are there any opportunities for that city to join with neighboring cities who may, together, have a combined population equal to or greater than the minimum population threshold? No, not in the first round. The legislature prioritized this funding first for cities of over 20,000 population, as these hold the greatest potential for increasing residential capacity. After first -round applications have been scored and ranked, Commerce will review applications from smaller cities. 5. Is it still $100,000 limit if a city applies with an adjacent jurisdiction? 11 08-05-2019 67 For two or more eligible cities working on a joint project, they may each submit an application, referencing the work with the other jurisdiction(s). For multi -jurisdictional activities, where partner cities are not eligible for the first round of funding, a single application should be submitted by the jurisdiction eligible for the first round of funding, including funding for ineligible partners at significantly lower amounts than eligible jurisdictions. 6. HB 1923 says that an eligible jurisdiction must be "planning to take at least two actions...between the effective date of this section and April 1, 2021..." That states an intent. If we were to apply for a grant with the intent of completing that work and moving the ordinance to city council for action prior to 4/21 but the political process pushes the adoption beyond that date, does this imply that the city has to pay the state back? No, we do not anticipate providing an advance that would need to be paid back, but rather, the grant is structured as a performance -based contract, with a scope of work, milestones, and deliverables completed in order to receive payments, including the final deliverable(s). The contract end date will coincide with the end of the state fiscal year, June 30, 2021. Therefore, final payment, as a percentage of the overall grant award, will be contingent on submittal of any adopted actions as final deliverables. The final amount will be 30 percent of the total grant award. 7. Once the grant money is received, can it be used for any action to do with the adoption of these regulations? The contract will include a work plan identifying the tasks that would be covered by the grant, such as any actions required to develop and adopt the regulations / housing action plan. This could be hiring consultants, paying for staff, or public consultation, consistent with state spending guidelines. 8. If we have already started an eligible activity, can we use the funds to complete the activity within the grant timeline? Yes, however, the application should clearly document progress to date and detail the tasks that will be carried out using grant funds. If most of the activity is already complete, it may not qualify as one of the two actions required under the bill. In this case, at least two additional activities would be needed to qualify for grant funding. 12 08-05-2019 68 Scoring will be based on whether the project is eligible. Applications will be ranked according to how they implement the goals of E2SHB 1923. 1. One of the actions identified under the bill includes a Housing Action Plan. May grant funds be utilized for a "Housing Assessment Study"? Yes, you could apply for this as part of the grant, but it should be part of a much larger package of actions. A "Housing Assessment study" appears to be just the first of seven components of housing action plan defined in the bill. The legislature provided up to $100,000 for a full housing action plan. 2. The bill seems a little unclear as to what are the specific expectations and requirements to be considered an acceptable "Housing Action Plan". Is it possible to see a "model" "Housing Action Plan" to better understand the specific requirements of what constitutes a "Housing Action Plan". The bill lists a number of steps which must be completed, and best practices suggest a few other steps. Housing action plans must include all elements in the bill to be eligible for funding. Commerce does not have a model housing action plan at this time. However, many Washington jurisdictions have already adopted housing strategies, such as Tacoma's Affordable Housing Action Strategy and Wenatchee Our Valley Our Future action plan, which were considered as models when the bill was adopted. 3. Questions on E2SHB 1923 subsections 1(b): We exceed this amount of acreage in this zoning category with transit — is this for additional acreage? The language in the bill says 500 acres in one or more areas for larger jurisdictions. If you already have a 500-acre sub -area that meets the density and transit frequency in the bill, then you have already completed this option, unless the work will enable additional housing capacity. YOU may do additional planning for an already -designated 500-acre sub -area to meet the density criteria in the bill. If the transit service does not currently meet the "high quality transit definition, (bus service at least four times per hour, at least 12 hours per day), then this is not a project that is eligible for funding. 4. Does the requirement that the subarea be within one-half mile of a transit stop mean that the subarea plan must include all of the area within one-half mile of the transit stop, or could a subset of the half -mile area be considered? We read the language to mean that the subarea itself must be within one-half mile of the stop, but that the subarea could be smaller in size than the half -mile radius. (Our subarea would be centered on the station 13 08-05-2019 69 but would not extend an entire half -mile in every direction —particularly as a large wetland, zoned for resource protection, is nearby.) Our guidance on subarea planning choices(1 a or b) recognizes that natural features are going to affect subarea planning, and that planning may be along a transit corridor, more than in a simple circle. However, the planning area should include everything within the Y2 mile / 10-minute walkshed of the transit stop, and naturally, will identify things like a wetland complex that would be incompatible with high density development. 5. Could the subarea plan consider transportation connections to areas outside of the specific subarea? We would like to do comprehensive planning in the area around the station, but could also use assistance in formulating a more generalized plan to connect the subarea to other parts of the city (through future road connections, identification of possible pedestrian/bicycle paths, etc.) The intent of the bill was to catalyze residential building capacity. While projects to connect more areas to the BRT stations are a great idea, unless the project will increase residential building capacity, that portion is unlikely to be eligible for funding under this grant. If increased residential capacity results in the need for additional transportation planning, that may be eligible for funding. 6. Item 1(d) — how is "cluster zoning" and "lot size averaging" defined in an urban definition? The intent appears to be to remove or reduce the minimum lot size so that a greater variety of lot sizes and housing types could be constructed on a given parcel within an urban growth area. 7. We recently adopted an ADU ordinance that meets the criteria for such in HB 1923. There is much work yet to do in implementing that ordinance to encourage and support ADU development in the city. Would that be a category of work that would be eligible for the grant? The language of the bill states that jurisdictions must "take action" to be eligible for the funding. If the ordinance is already adopted, actions beyond that to directly implement the ordinance, such as creating guidance materials and developing new procedures are likely to eligible activities, however, marketing materials would not likely be an eligible expense. In order to receive funding, implementation activities would need to be clearly outlined in the proposed work program. 8. For option 1.i., would a hybrid form/use based code qualify for funding? Most form -based codes have some limits on use. A hybrid form -based code that sets some limits on use would very likely qualify for funding under the grant. 14 08-05-2019 70 Growth Management Services E2SHB 1923Grant Application Form Summary Page Name ofJuMsdicbmn(o) Total Funding Request $ Which of the following activities do you intend to pursue with this grant? , _ _ _ Increase residential density near commuter or light rail stations to 50 dwelling units per acre. Increase residential density along high frequencytrandtcorrdonsto2SdvveUingVnitsper Authorize etleast one duplex, triplex, orcourtyard apartment mneach parcel inone nrmore zoning districts that permit single-family residences. Authorize cluster zoning orlot size averaging inaUzoningdisthctsthatpennitsinghe4ani|y residences. Authorize accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on all parcels containing single-family homes. Adopt asubarea plan pursuant toRCVV43.21[.42O. Adopt eplanned action pursuant toKCVV43.21C.44O/lXb\(ii). Adopt an infill exemption under RCW 43.21C.229 for residential or mixed -use development. Adopt aform-based code in one or more zoning districts that permit residential uses. Authorize a duplex on each corner lot within all zoning districts that permit single-family residences. Allow for the division or redivision of land into the maximum number of lots through the short subdivision process provided inchapter S8.17R[VV. Authorize a nnininnurn net density ofsix dwelling units per acre in all residential zones, where the residential development capacity will increase within the city. Housing action plan. 71 1. Jurisdiction Information Applying Jurisdiction Joint Applicants If two or more cities are jointly applying and collaborating on this grant, please duplicate this page, and submit a separate page for each city. Please indicate which city is the "lead" city for purposes of the grant. Project Manager If submitting a joint application, this designated lead person will be responsible for keeping the other participant city contacts informed about the grant. Name (Lead Contact) Title Department Mailing Address City State Zip Code Telephone Number Email Financial Contact Please provide name and contact information for the person who will be responsible for receiving and accounting for the grant funds. Name Title Department Telephone Number E-mail Unified Business Identifier (UBI) Number Statewide Vendor (SWV) Number Authorized Official The name and title of the office authorized to sign the grant agreement on behalf of the city. Name Title 72 2 � Th6�ScK���f����k��Project Schedule . ^���.$� Provide a complete a proposed Scope of Work, detailing the Steps for each Action. Instructions are inthe Grant Application Instructions. w All local legislative actions must beadopted prior toApril 1,302l. • Any grant Deliverables must besubmitted byJune 1S,2O2l. • If you propose multiple Actions/Steps/Deliverables, please duplicate the table below as needed. Scope of Work For each Action, please copy the Action description, as written in the last pages of the Grant Application Instructions. Action: Deliverables Description Start Date End Date Action Step 1.1 StepI-2 Step 13 Stepl.4 Deliverable I :k, Proposed Budget/ Financial Information ^nan^aUUnformat^on Please proposed a project Budget to reflect your expected expenses in each of the categories. Include only the expenses that will be directly related to completing the items included in the Scope ofWork. Please provide a summary of the level of effort, or the amount of funding needed tofund each action proposed for the grant. Action /Deliverables Commerce Funds Other Funds [If applicable] Action1 $ $ Action 2. $ $ Axtion3. $ $ 73 Budget Narrative: For each Action, please support the funding request with estimates of staff hours (may be per Action Step, or ), staff hourly rates, and other expenses. 4. Grant Application U^���^n ��x��8t^K�ns and Scoring Method - - When developing E2SHB1923grant awards tolocal governments, Commerce has been directed to develop criteria to ensure that grant funds awarded are prioritized for cities over 20,000 in population, proportionate to the level of effort proposed by a city, and the potential increase in residential building capacity, or regulatory streamlining that could be achieved. Please refer tpthe Grant Application Instructions for more detail regarding scoring and ranking. 4.a Readiness to Proceed: (0-20 points) Please state how the project can be started and completed before April 1, 2021. Refer to the scope of work if needed. Provide key comprehensive plan policies, housing strategies, or other directives that support the development of the selected actions. Identify the key staff or consultants who will be implementing the project along with their history regarding their ability to successfully complete other grant projects. 74 4.b Local Commitment to the Project: (0-10 points) Describe the impact that Commerce grant funds will have on the project. Indicate whether the proposed project is related to an existing project that will proceed even without the Commerce grant funds. Would this project continue without the funds? What local funding or in -kind services are leveraged by this grant, for example, the amount of staff time and/or funding that is committed to the project as well as other funding and "in -kind" support. 4.c Potential to increase housing supply or provide regulatory streamlining (0-40 points*) Up to 20 bonus points are available for applications demonstrating extraordinary potential to meet grant program goals. Please describe how the proposed actions will increase residential founding capacity or streamline regulations. Provide detail on your assumptions over the 20-year planning period. More information on what to include in this section is in the Grant Application instructions. 75 4.d Local or regional need /0-20 points) Commerce will score this section based on a formula of cost burden and extreme cost burden data within your community. For applications with multiple jurisdictions, this data will be weighted by population. If there are particular factors that should be considered, please provide a short paragraph with details and facts. 4.e Demonstration Potential: (0-10 points) |sthis aproject thatxvou|dprovdeenexornp|ethatcaneosi|ybeusedbvother|oca|govennnnents? Describe how the project ore|enlentsmfthep 'ectcuu|dbe1nansfernedtootherjurisdictions. Include factors that may limit the transferability of the project, such as budget and staffing, and factors that would make it broadly applicable. Thank you for completing this application. Applications must be submitted in electronic format, along with aletter ofsupport from the mayor. Applications must beennaUed,preferably asa single document to gmsgrants@commerce.wa.gov by 5:00 p.m. on September 30, 2019. CHECKLIST Letter of authorization from City Mayor or authorized official, formalizing commitment to the project. —1 Submit application and letter to gmsgrants(cDcommerce.wa.gov by September 30, 5:00 p.m. Complete Survey Monkey survey on your jurisdiction's existing use of these tools and intent under the grant. https://www.survevmonkev.com/r/lVBSRGF 76 TO: FROM: City of Tukwila INFOR ATIONAL E ORANDU Community Development & Neighborhoods Committee Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst Allan Ekberg, Mayor CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: September 13, 2019 SUBJECT: Resolution Restating City Commitment to Being Diverse, Tolerant and Inclusive ISSUE The City Council desires to update the sentiments expressed in Resolution 1900 to include stronger language condemning hate and intimidation crimes. BACKGROUND In 2016, in response to concerns expressed by community members regarding discriminatory and sometimes hateful rhetoric occurring across the nation, the City Council adopted Resolution 1900 to reaffirm its commitment for Tukwila to remain a diverse, tolerant and inclusive community. At the August 5, 2019 Council meeting, and in response to public comment given that night, Councilmember Robertson requested and obtained consensus to make a formal statement against instances of hate, bigotry, and domestic terrorism. Staff determined one effective way to accomplish this would be to revisit Resolution 1900 which already states the Council's collective values regarding diversity, tolerance, and civility, as well as asserts that "all of Tukwila's residents deserve to live in a safe environment free of hate, discrimination and fear." Rather than amending that resolution, which would cause these value statements to exist separately in two documents, staff proposes repealing 1900 and restating the language with the desired additions so that all of the text will reside in one new resolution. The City Council reviewed the proposed new resolution at its September 3 meeting and referred it to the Community Development & Neighborhoods Committee for further discussion and an opportunity to review the changes made from Resolution 1900. ATTACHMENTS Comparison of Resolution 1900 and proposed draft Draft resolution 77 78 A -RE -SOLUTION -OF -THE —CITY -GO CITY OF , ASHt I-TS- TMENT TO BE TOL-E-RANT-A-N-D.-1-NG-LIJS-1-V-E CITY. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RESTATING THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO BEING DIVERSE, TOLERANT AND INCLUSIVE,AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1900. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila is a beautifully diverse community of neighborhoods, residents, businesses and visitors; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila considers this diversity to be one of its greatest assets and prioritizes the value of inclusiveness; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1614 in 2006 reaffirming its commitment to being an inclusive community as a fundamental value; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 1900 in 2016reaffirmingits co mitment to being a diverse, tolerant and inclusive community: and WHEREAS, we, as elected representatives of the people, have a responsibility to not stay silent in the face of violence and discrimination against any person -of -our const4pent pa s; and WHEREAS, the people of Tukwila recognize that people of all cultures, ethnicities, abilities, and backgrounds all do better when we work together; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila promotes civility and strives for a culture where tolerance and solidarity overcome fear and division; and Page 1 of 3 79 WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila does not tolerate bias, harassment, or discrimination based on race, religion, ancestry, national origin, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, housing status or status with regard to public assistance; and WHEREAS, we advance the principles of non -violence, tolerance, religious freedom, trust and safety, and recognize that these principles are valued by all communities in our City; and WHEREAS, all of Tukwila's residents deserve to live in a safe environment free of hate, discrimination and fear; and WHEREAS, we believe in the public sector for the public good, and advancing equity and inclusion is critical to the success of our communities and our nation; and loca WHEREAS because hate crimes and incidences of e iona , and nationa , :imidation are on the rise e Cftv Council desires to reiterate their osition that all elected officias,whether loca , state, or federal, should be leaders in opposing hate speech and especially careful to never use such language in spoken, written, or social media, C 'TY AND -A AND —VISITORS —I - REJECT THE- --POL-I-TICS- N, BIG-OT-RY, DISCRIMI -THE—RAG , INTERESTS OF ALL THE R-GOMMU-N-ITY-NO-MATTE THE-CO-W-R-OF-OUR-SKINT-OUR-GE-N-DER,-THE WAY -WE WORSHI , WERE-BORN,-OLIR--SE ORIENTATIONT-OU-R -413-1L-IT4ES-,----OR, ANY- IDENT/TY. FLIRTHERMO-RE, WE RESOLVE TO: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Cit Council reaffirms its co t ent to e ua and inclusivenes for all residents and visitors to our City, We reject the politics and language of division, bigotry, violence, hate and discrimination, We will fight for the rights, freedoms and interests of all the members of our community no matter what the color of ourskirour gender, the way we worship, where we were born, our sexual orientation, our abilities, or an other iden Furthermore e resolve to: 1. Prioritize and promote a welcoming environment for all in our community and recognize the rights of individuals to live their lives with dignity and free of discrimination. 2. Commit to pursuing a policy agenda that affirms civil and human rights and ensures that those targeted on the basis of culture, religion or immigration status can turn to government without fear of recrimination. Page 2 of 3 80 3. Engage with individuals and community groups to promote education and dialogue among all community members. 4, Denounce the use of language expressing hate with the intent to strike fear :the hearts of people because of their racial, cultural, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or national. origin differences, action 2. Resolutigm No. 1900 is hereb re ealed tri its eritirety Page 3 of 3 81 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RESTATING THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO BEING DIVERSE, TOLERANT AND INCLUSIVE, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1900. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila is a beautifully diverse community of neighborhoods, residents, businesses and visitors; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila considers this diversity to be one of its greatest assets and 'Prioritizes the value of inclusiveness; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1614 in 2006 reaffirming its commitment to being an inclusive community as a fundamental value; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1900 in 2016 reaffirming its commitment to being a diverse, tolerant and inclusive community; and WHEREAS, we, as elected representatives of the people, have a responsibility to not stay silent in the face of violence and discrimination against any person; and WHEREAS, the people of Tukwila recognize that people of all cultures, ethnicities, abilities, and backgrounds all do better when we work together; and VVHEREAS, the City of Tukwila promotes civility and strives for a culture where tolerance and solidarity overcome fear and division; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila does not tolerate bias, harassment, or discrimination based on race, religion, ancestry, national origin, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, housing status or status with regard to public assistance; and WitLegisiative DevelopmenttRecommitment to being diverse -tolerant -inclusive 8-23-19 LH:dis Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page I of 3 83 WHEREAS, we advance the principles of non -violence, tolerance, religious freedom, trust and safety, and recognize that these principles are valued by all communities in our City; and WHEREAS, all of Tukwila's residents deserve to live in a safe environment free of hate, discrimination and fear; and WHEREAS, we believe in the public sector for the public good, and advancing equity and inclusion is critical to the success of our communities and our nation; and WHEREAS, because hate crimes and incidences of intimidation are on the rise locally, regionally, and nationally, the City Council desires to reiterate their position that all elected officials, whether local, state, or federal, should be leaders in opposing hate speech and especially careful to never use such language in spoken, written, or social media; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council reaffirms its commitment to equality and inclusiveness for all residents and visitors to our City. We reject the politics and language of division, bigotry, violence, hate and discrimination. We will fight for the rights, freedoms and interests of all the members of our community no matter what the color of our skin, our gender, the way we worship, where we were born, our sexual orientation, our abilities, or any other identity. Furthermore, we resolve to; 1. Prioritize and promote a welcoming environment for all in our community and recognize the rights of individuals to live their lives with dignity and free of discrimination. 2. Commit to pursuing a policy agenda that affirms civil and human rights and ensures that those targeted on the basis of culture, religion or immigration status can turn to government without fear of recrimination. 3. Engage with individuals and community groups to promote education and dialogue among all community members. 4. Denounce the use of language expressing hate with the intent to strike fear in the hearts of people because of their racial, cultural, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or national origin differences. Section 2. Resolution No. 1900 is hereby repealed in its entirety. VV: \Legislative DevelopmentlRecommitment to being diverse-toterant-inclusive 8-23-19 LH:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton 84 Page 2 of 3 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, VVASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2019. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Kathy Hougardy, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Dennis Robertson, Tukwila City Council Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Verna Seal, Tukwila City Council Filed with the City Clerk: DeSean Quinn, Tukwila City Council Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Kate Kruller, Tukwila City Counci Thomas McLeod, Tukwila City Council Zak Idan, Tukwila City Council \Legistafive Development\Recommitment to being diverse -tolerant -inclusive 8-23-19 Lftbjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 3 of 3 85 86