Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL12-023 - AT&T - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT / SPECIAL PERMISSION: SENSITIVE AREAS AND SEPAAT&T LINK TIE-IN COTTAGE CREEK PL1 2-023 Ll 2-022 Ll 2-023 E 12-006 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL PERMISSIONS - CRITICAL AREA SENSITIVE AREAS, SEPA City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: hap://www.Tuk-wi]aWA.R-ov File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E12-006 07/10/2012 09/19/2012 APPROVED Applicant: AT&T LINK 16 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: AT&T is proposing to install approximately 6,000 linear feet of underground conduit, with manholes/handholes and cable, within the right of way of Southcenter Boulevard from 52nd Avenue S. to Fun Center Way. The purposes of the underground cable to provide telecommunication services. Conduit lines will be placed on the Southcenter Blvd Bridge, which extends over the Green River. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: 0001 Section/Township/Range: SOUTHCENTER BV FROM 52 AV TO FUN CENTER The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under the option DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period. Jack ce, Resy City Tukwila 63001$outhcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNSOP-8/07 E12-006 Printed: 09-18-2012 e y, o f J akwda Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting x Determination of Non- Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Si nificance Determination of Significance & Scoping Short Subdivision Agenda Notice Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached, including sent electronically to DOE - SEPA on this _20 day of _September , _2012 Project Name: AT&T LINK 16 - SOUTHCENTER BV FROM 52 AV TO FUN CENTER Project Number: PL12-023 Associated File Number s : E12-006 Mailing requested by: Brandop7Miles Mailer's signature: W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC AGENCY LABELS Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Corps of Engineers () US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) Federal HWY Admin () US Dept of HUD ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 () National Marine Fisheries Service ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ,SHORELINE NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT ( ) Office of the Governor Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically ( ) WA State Community Development () Office of Attorney General ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office () Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12" Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) KC Boundary Review Board () Health Department ( ) Fire District # 11 () Port of Seattle ( ) Fire District # 2 () KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div () KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation () KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Assessor's Office () KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) KC Public Library System O Westfield Mall Library ( ) Foster Library () Tukwila School District ( ) Renton Library () Highline School District ( ) Kent Library () Seattle School District ( ) Seattle Library () Renton School District Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) QWEST Communications () BP Olympic Pipeline () Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Seattle City Light () Val-Vue Sewer District () Allied Waste Services ( ) Puget Sound Energy () Water District # 20 ( ) Highline Water District () Water District # 125 ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept () City of Renton Public Works ( ) Comcast () Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Tukwila City Departments () Kent Planning Dept () Public Works ( ) Fire () Renton Planning Dept () Police ( ) Finance () City of SeaTac () Planning ( ) Building () City of Burien () Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor () City of Seattle () City Clerk () Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council () Puget Sound Clean Air Agency O W KC Chamber of Commerce OSound Transit/SEPA Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * () Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition ultural Resources () Washington Environmental Council %Wsheries Program () People for Puget Sound. ildlife Program () Futurewise ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Seattle Times () Highline Times ( ) South County Journal () City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper, SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) - Notice to DOE must be bV return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (printed out from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist MEMORANDUM To: Jack Pace, Director From: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Date: September 17, 2012 Re: AT&T Link 16 Tie In Completion Project Description: AT&T is proposing to install approximately 6,000 linear feet of underground conduit, with manholes/handholes and cable, within the right of way of Southcenter Boulevard from 52°d Avenue S. to Fun Center Way. The purposes of the underground cable to provide telecommunication services. Conduit lines will be placed on the Southcenter Blvd Bridge, which extends over the Green River. Agencies with Jurisdiction: • City of Tukwila • Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife • Washington State Department of Natural Resources • Washington State Department of Transportation • Washington State Department of Ecology Notification: On August 3, 2012 a Notice of Application was circulated to potentially impacted agencies and Native American Tribes. A copy of the Notice of Application was also published in the Seattle Times on that same day. The Notice of Application covered the work proposed under the SEPA application, shoreline permit and special permission from the Director application. Other Known Required Permits/Approvals: • Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, City of Tukwila • Special Permission from the Director, City of Tukwila • Public Works Construction Permit, City of Tukwila • Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife • Approval from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources • Approval from the Washington State Department of Transportation Brandon Miles Page 1 09/18/2012 H:\Developments\AT&T\sepa-staffipt. doc Documents Adopted by Reference: • SEPA Checklist date July 10, 2012 • Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist, not dated stamped. • Construction plans date stamped June 26, 2012 Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth Concur with checklist. All work will be within the City's right of way, with most of the proposed conduit being placed beneath existing asphalt. Portions of the conduit will be installed along the existing Southcenter Blvd Bridge, which extends over the Green River. -Air Concur with checklist. The only impacts will be during construction. Best management practices will be implemented during construction activities to reduce and control dust and air emissions. Water The proposed conduit line will extend over the Green River. In order to reduce impacts to the River, the conduit line will be connecting to the existing Southcenter Blvd Bridge, which extends over the Green River. While construction activities will occur over the River, no work will occur within the River or along any portion of the shoreline environment that is undisturbed. BMPs will be used during construction to reduce any impacts to the river. There are no foreseeable long term impacts to the River associated with this project. Work is also proposed near Cottage Creek which is located on the grounds of Tukwila City Hall at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. The applicant has submitted an application to the City requesting permission to work within the buffer area. The buffer area is already highly degraded. Plants A small amount of vegetation will be disturbed as a result of this project. All areas will be restored to pre -project conditions. Animals Concur with checklist, except that the checklist lists that the project site is not near any threatened or endangered species, which is not correct. There are salmon species, which are listed as threatened, present within the Green River. Energy/Natural Resources Concur with checklist. B. Miles 2 H:\Developments\AT&T\sepa-staffrpt. doc Environmental Health Concur with checklist. Most of the noise from the project will be short term and will be associated with construction equipment. The SEPA Checklist outlines best management practices which will be utilized to reduce impacts during construction. All work is proposed to be completed during daytime hours which will reduce noise impacts to surrounding land uses. Land/Shoreline Use All of the proposed work will be located within the City's or State's right of way. The current use of the property is that of a roadway. A small portion of the project will require the placement of conduit lines on the existing Southcenter Blvd Bridge, which extends over the Green River. Zoning of the surrounding properties includes Office, and Regional Commercial Mixed Use. • Housing N/A, Concur with checklist. • Aesthetics N/A, Concur with checklist. • Light and Glare Concur with checklist • Recreation Some of the nearby recreation uses include, Westfield Southcenter, LA Fitness, Acme Bowl, and the Green River Trail. No long term impacts to recreation activities are foreseen. During construction some sidewalks may be impacted, but detour routes and signage will be provided. Historic and Cultural Preservation Concur with checklist. All work will be within the City's existing right of way and thus discovering any historical or cultural artifacts is very unlikely. Transportation Concur with checklist. Public Services Concur with checklist. B. Miles 3 H:\Developments\AT&T\sepa-staffrpt. doc Utilities Concur with checklist Comments During the Notice of Application period the City received no phone calls, emails, or letters regarding the proposed project. Recommendation: Determination of Non -Significance. The optional DNS process should be used. B. Miles 4 H:\Developments\AT&T\sepa-stafftpt. doc I City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: h!M://www.Tukwi]aWA..Pov RECEIPT Parcel No.: 0001 Address: Suite No: Applicant: AT & T LINK 16 Receipt No.: R12-02085 Initials: TLS User ID: 1670 Payee: SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Descriptio Amount ---------- ----------- ---------- ------------ Payment Check 6459 1,985.00 Authorization No. Permit Number: E12-006 Status: PENDING Applied Date: 07/10/2012 Issue Date: Payment Amount: $1,985.00 Payment Date: 07/10/2012 02:48 PM Balance: $0.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Account Code Current Pmts ------------------------------------------------------------------ MAPS/PUBLIC/MAILING 000.341,500 420.00 SEPA 000.345.831 1,565.00 Total: $1,985.00 -P& &C Z - zz doc: Receipt-06 Printed: 07-10-2012 eit�t q J micu" Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl x Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Si nificance Determination of Significance & Scoping Short Subdivision Agenda Notice Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Sent electronically to Other: x DOE/SEPA Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _3rd day of _August , _2012 Project Name: AT&T Link Project Number: PL12-023 Associated File Number s : L12-022, L12-023, E12-006 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: 7/ k/ v W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC u�lr 1r1t!1 , QJt•r�7Vk Jai f AGENCY LABELSI.2 Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES US Corps of Engineers () US Environmental Protection Agency ( ) Federal HWY Admin () US Dept of HUD (E.P.A.) ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 N%NNational Marine Fisheries Service 'k Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES Office of Archaeology () Dept of Social & Health Services N Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. Dept of Natural Resources ******* ( ) Office of the Governor Dept of Ecology, SEPA * e ronically ( ) WA State Community Development () Office of Attorney Gene' �WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office I () Office of Hearing Examiner WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12r' Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) KC Boundary Review Board () Health Department ( ) Fire District # 11 () Port of Seattle ( ) Fire District # 2 N%&KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div () KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation () KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Assessor's Office KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andv Levesaue Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) KC Public Library System O Westfield Mall Library ( ) Foster Library () Tukwila School District ( ) Renton Library () Highline School District ( ) Kent Library () Seattle School District { ) Seattle Library O Renton School District Section S UTILITIES ( ) QWEST Communications () BP Olympic Pipeline () Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Seattle City Light () Val-Vue Sewer District () Allied Waste Services ( ) Puget Sound Energy () Water District # 20 ( ) Highline Water District () Water District # 125 ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept () City of Renton Public Works ( ) Comcast () Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Kent Planning Dept () Public Works ( ) Fire Renton Planning Dept () Police ( ) Finance ( ) City of SeaTac () Planning ( ) Building ( ) City of Burien () Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City of Seattle () City Clerk ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects Puget Sound Regional Council SW KC Chamber of Commerce Muckleshoot Indian Tribe ( ) Cultural Resources Fisheries Program-_ `7 Wildlife Program ) Duwamish Indian Tribe Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition Jfr-( ���►� () Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Seattle Times () Highline Times ( ) South County Journal () City of Tukwila Website River P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Pubyc Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) — Notice to DOE must be b return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (printed out from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist PROJECT INFORMATION AT&T Communication of the Pacific NW, Inc., has filed applications to install conduit lines within the existing right of way of Southcenter Blvd, generally between Interstate 405 and Interstate 5. The proposed work will require installing conduit lines on the Southcenter Blvd Bridge, which expands over the Green River. Work is also proposed within the buffer area of Cottage Creek, located near 6300 Southcenter Blvd. The applicant has filed the following applications with the City: Shoreline Substantial Permit, SEPA review, and Special Permission from the Director (working within the creek buffer). . Permits applied for include: Shoreline Substantial Permit; SEPA Review; and Special Permission from the Director. Other known required permits include: Right of Way Use Permit Studies required with the applications include: None known at this time. An environmental checklist has been submitted with the studies identified above. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100; Tukwila, WA, 98188 or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M. on September 5, 2012. Comments may also be emailed to Brandon.Miles@Tukwilawa.gov. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. For further information on this proposal, call Brandon J. Miles at (206) 431-3684 or send an email to Brandon.MilesCoT'ukwilawa.gov. You can also visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: July 10, 2012 Notice of Completeness Issued: August 2, 2012 Notice of Application Issued: August 6, 2012 a I t0 20121 d1l,PFTUKWILA� t of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: lanning�rziTr-rklvilaWA. gov Planner: RECEIVED �JUL 10 20121 COMMUNITY SEI_oPlirtEror ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA File Number: ,4-- / "—) Application Complete Date: Application Incomplete Date: Project File Number: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECUDEVELOPMENT: AT&T Link 16 Tie -In Completion LOCATION OF PROJECUDEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. Southcenter Boulevard from 52nd Avenue to Fun Center Way. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). Not applicable. Project is entirely within public rights of way. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Daniel J. McGeough - AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. Address: 11241 NE Willows Road, Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: (425) 896-9830 FAX: (206) 505-0050 E-mail: Signatul H:\Land Use Applications In PDf\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I. Doe /4 J/ a (' J b (119t U 1' 1 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: AT&T Link 16 Tie -In Completion 2. Name of Applicant: AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. 3. Date checklist prepared: June 18, 2012 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): July -September, 2012 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A section by section site conditions report prepared by Cooke Scientific, which noted the absence of critical areas along the proposed conduit alignment. Agency Comments RECEIVED !JUL 10 2012 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other COMMUNI lY proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. DEVELOPMENT No. H:\Land Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc Page I SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Street Opening Permit from the City of Tukwila WSDOT Utility Permit Amendment Department of Natural Resources Permit Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. This project involves the placement of approximately 6,000 feet of underground conduit, manholes/handholes and cable to connect existing AT&T facilities on Southcenter Boulevard from 52nd Avenue to Fun Center Way for the purpose of providing telecommunications services. Proposed facilities will include conduit for the City of Tukwila. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed project will be within the right-of-way limits of Southcenter Boulevard, I-5 and 1-405 and shall begin at an existing AT&T manhole at 52nd Avenue and proceed easterly to an existing AT&T manhole at Fun Center Way, a distance of approximately 6,000 feet. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-]an2011.doc Page 2 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The project area is identified as Urban Land on the NRCS maps. Much of the conduit alignment is under asphalt or concrete. There is some sandy loam, some gravely silty loam and some silty loam. No hydric soils were found. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? RECEivED If so, describe. 'JUL 10 2012 No. COMMUNE iY L)EI/EL6Ph1ENT e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed. H:\Land Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc Page 3 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No erosion is anticipated. Excavated areas shall be backfilled and stabilized at the end of each workday. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No new impervious surfaces are proposed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No erosion is anticipated; however, siltation fencing will be placed around the work areas on both sides of the Green River. Please refer to enclosed plans. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Conduit and manholes/handholes are proposed to be placed utilizing horizontal drilling machines and conventional backhoes powered by diesel engines. Quantities of emissions are unknown. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc Page 4 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Green River. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the proposed conduit system will be attached to the bridge that crosses over the Green River. In addition, at its closest point, there is proposed excavation approximately 100 feet from the top of the river bank. Siltation fencing will be placed between the work area and the top of bank. Please refer to Sheets NG 605DN-070 and -071 of the enclosed plans. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None proposed. H:\Land Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc Page 5 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. M 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. H:\Land Use Applications in PDP\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 6 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: Not applicable. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable. HALand Use Applications in PDf1SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 7 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ Shrubs ✓ Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soilplants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No vegetation removal or alteration is proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No known endangered species on or near project site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None proposed. RECEIVED UUL 10 2012 DEVELOPNMENT H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 8 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, sa mon trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known to be on or near project site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. Agency Comments H:\Land Usc Applications in PDRSEPA Environmcntal Rcvicw Application-Jan26l Ldoc Page 9 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. No energy reduction measures are planned. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 10 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing noise levels will not impact proposed work. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise generated by drilling and excavation equipment during daylight hours. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None proposed. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Project site is Southcenter Boulevard right-of-way. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. H:\Land Use Applications in PDP\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 11 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Describe any structures on the site. The bridge that crosses over the Green River is the only existing structure in the project area. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 1►51 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Public right-of-way. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not known. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. Agency Comments 'ECEI Fie IJUL 10 2012 DEVEEoP "'ter H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 12 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. W 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. H:\Land Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 13 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? All proposed structures will be underground, below existing surfaces. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. H:\Land Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 14 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I.doc Page 15 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. [Me c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. Agency Comments RECEIVED IJUL 10 2012 COMMUNHY DEVELOPMENT H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoe Page 16 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Southcenter Boulevard, I-5, I-405. No new access to the existing street system is proposed. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc Page 17 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). I2re l e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. HALand Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 18 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water efuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer septic Sys e other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Please refer to responses to questions 10 and 11. H:\Land Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 19 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? During construction there will be some exhaust emissions and noise from construction equipment; however, post construction, none of these conditions will apply. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No affect. There are no wild animals present in the work area and any fish are in the Green River, well below the bridge where the conduit and cable will be attached. The project is not near a marine area. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None proposed. HALand Use Applications in PDF1sEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 20 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not likely. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None proposed. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No environmentally critical areas are present in or adjacent to the work area except at the Green River. A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit addresses the impact of the proposed bridge attachment which falls in the Urban Conservancy Buffer. The remainder of the proposed conduit and cable for this project will be installed below any buffer area utilizing directional drilling methods; therefore, no impacts to environmentally critical areas are anticipated. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? There will be no affect on land or shoreline use. HALmd Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 21 a SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Not likely. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None proposed. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts are anticipated. D. SIGNATURE Agency Comments Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: H:\Land Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 22 City of .-.n-wila ESA Screening Checklist Date: Applicant Name: Street Address: City, State, Zip: _ City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. 11241 NE Willows Road Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone: (425) 896-9830 DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. HAL,and Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc Page 1 City o, . akwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. (O - Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. (SO)_Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-I (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. NO Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete KNLand Use Applications in PDFISHPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 2 City of - _.kwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) K\Land Usc Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Rcvicw Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 3 City of _ -- ,wila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) 1JUL 10 2012 COMIDE 6pIWE rir H:Tand Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 City of . �rkwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 34 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross -sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross -sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 HALand Use Applications in PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 5 City of - ..wily ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) H:Uand Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 Ldoc Page 6 RFP # 20110119.001.P Item Description Spec. Ref. Est. Unit Price No. Unit Qty. Price Amount 6. Furnish and install two (2), four -inch, schedule 40 201, 204, LS 1 $ $37,000 galvanized steel conduits by bridge attachment. Price 405 shall include placement of conduits (250'x2), trapeze style hangers (40), seismic braces (8), braces and locks at center point of each conduit (2), expansion joints (6), heavy duty 1-5/8" x 1-5/8" x 12 gauge unistrut (hot dip galv.) (50') hold down clamps and all other ancillary hardware. *All utilities and utility support surfaces, including any galvanized utilities, shall be given a primer coat of State standard formula A-6-86 and two coats of State standard C- 0-86. The final coat shall match the Bridge color. Any paint spatters shall be removed from the Bridge. Painting shall be completed prior to attachment to Bridge. **Install epoxy anchor bolts to clear reinforcing steel in the bridge deck soffit. Utilize rebar scanning device to locate rebar prior to drilling. If reinforcing steel is hit when drilling, the drilled hole shall be abandoned and filled with non -shrinking grout conforming to the requirements of section 6-02.3(20). The drilled hole shall be moved to clear the reinforcing steel. ***There shall be a minimum 3-inch clearance from the edge of the bridge deck to the center of the drilled hole. ****All steel in utility supports, including fastenings and anchorages, shall be galvanized in accordance with AASHTO M-1 I I or M-232 (ASTM A123 or A153 respectively). *****All hangers shall be "double -nutted" per the plans 7. Transport and install 4'x4'x4' fiberglass manhole. Price 205, 206, Each 2 $4500 $9000 shall include transportation from AT&T's North Bend 700 facility to site, placement of structure, grounding, appropriate backfill material, compaction and surface restoration to preconstruction conditions. 8. Transport and install 4'x4'x4' (444LA) concrete manhole. 205, 206, Each 1 $ $ Price shall include transportation from AT&T's North Bend 700 facility to site, placement of structure, grounding, appropriate backfill material, compaction and surface restoration to preconstruction conditions. 9. Transport and install TA-25 handhole for City of Tukwila. 205, 206, Each 1 $3000 $3000 Price shall include transportation (from location TBD), 702 placement of structure, grounding, appropriate backfill material, compaction and surface restoration to preconstruction conditions. RECEIVED IJUL 10 2012 DE ELOPMENT NO NET LOSS CHECKLIST What is No Net Loss? The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) requires protection of the natural resources and ecological functions of the shoreline environment. Ecological f auctions are processes that characterize the river and its shoreline and form habitats for water- and land -based wildlife and vegetation. Ecological processes depend on the geology, soil type, topography, climate, and other physical characteristics in the region. In the GreenlDuwamish River watershed, key ecological processes include: • river flows, tidal fluctuations and saltwater influences; • creation, transport and deposition of sediment (for example scouring of soils, and erosion and formation of mud -flats or beaches), • transport of nutrients (from decomposition of plants and other organic materials); • provision of woody debris from fallen limbs and trees along the banks or in the water (the trunks and branches help form pools for fish); and • water quality (such as vegetation that can help to filter out pollutants that are washed into the river from parking lots and vegetation that can help reduce temperatures in the river, important for fish, especially salmon). These physical and biological processes comprise the ecological functions of the shoreline. The state guidelines that implement the SMA, adopted in 2003, establish the standard of "no net loss" of shoreline ecological functions for land uses and development within the shoreline jurisdiction. The No Net Loss standard is designed to stop the introduction of new negative impacts to shoreline ecological functions resulting from new development. Tukwila's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) defines no net loss as a: "...standard intended to ensure that shoreline development or uses, whether permitted or exempt, are located and designed to avoid loss or degradation of shoreline ecological_firnctions that are necessmy to sustain shoreline natural resources. " In other words, the existing conditions of the shoreline ecological functions should not deteriorate due to new permitted development or new land use. A loss of ecological function can occur when a physical condition such as vegetation along the shoreline is removed or when habitat is altered through the construction of a dock or pier or other structures over this habitat. In order to maintain shoreline ecological functions, negative impacts must be mitigated to restore an equivalent amount of ecological function. The approach to mitigation must follow the mitigation sequencing steps adopted in the SMP (see next page). It should be noted that the SMA and the City's SMP also require improvement of shoreline functions, and therefore, some rc-vegetation of the shoreline will be required in proportion to the scale of the project, regardless of whether there is a net loss to ecological functions. RECEIVED CPL Pig 13 of 14 0411912012 11:09 AM w:\�Long Range ProjectskShoreline\New Shom ine Pcffnhs`,4-11-12 SSDP � UL 02012 DEVELOP&ItNT On a separate sheet of paper, please respond to the following questions to evaluate your project's impacts and assist in analyzing whether there will be a net loss to shoreline ecological functions requiring mitigation: Describe the existing condition of the shoreline area and riverbank. For example, what plants and how much vegetation currently exist within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction; what is the condition of the shoreline (how steep are the banks, is there any erosion or slope failure, what are the soils like); is there "hard armoring" on the riverbank (for example, concrete or wooden bulkheads, metal sheet piling, rip -rap [rocks or concrete/asphalt blocks]), is there paving or are there any structures within the 200 ft. shoreline jurisdiction; are there any docks, piers, decks or other structures near or over the water; are there any above -ground or below ground utilities; etc.? 2. How will your project change the existing condition of the shoreline described above? 3. Please respond to the questions in the following chart - A No Net Loss analysis (prepared by a qualified biologist) must be prepared if the response to any of the questions in the chart below is "yes": WILL THE PROJECT: NO YES a. Alter/remove vegetation in the shoreline jurisdiction? X b. Alter the river bank (i.e. re -slope bank, add armoring etc.)? X c. Add fill in the shoreline jurisdiction? X d. Discharge new stormwater to the river? X e. Store or use hazardous materials in the shoreline jurisdiction? X f. Construct an in- or over -water structure? X g. Increase impervious surface in the shoreline jurisdiction? 4. The way to achieve no net loss of ecological function is to mitigate the loss through one or a combination of the mitigation sequencing steps identified below. If preparing a No Net Loss analysis, please discuss how your project addresses the following mitigation sequencing steps (TMC 18.44.070 H.3.): a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations; e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective measures. CPL Page 14 of 14 04/19/2012 11:09 AM W..\1Long Range ProjmIs'ShorelincNew shoreline Penniis'4-11-12 SSDP .e 6a1 6J.1 IENA PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH REVIEW GUIDELINES cognizing the need to reduce the impact to the Urban Conservancy Buffer, AT&T will be ng a directional bore method of construction at the approach to both sides of the Southcenter roulevard Bridge over the Green River. The proposed plan will place a 4'x4'x 4' manhole on �h side of the River for AT&T's use and a 5'x 2' manhole for the City of Tukwila on the west e of the Green River and connect to an existing City of Tukwila manhole on the east side of the river. From these manholes, the conduit will sweep up the bridge abutment, where it will be attached to the bridge deck parallel to the existing Time Warner conduit. AT&T proposes to place (2) 4" rigid steel conduits equipped with (3) 1.25" innerducts, four (4) for AT&T's use and two (2) for the City of Tukwila's use. There are two existing bridge attachments on the Southcenter Boulevard Bridge. There will be no alteration of the riverbank and the overwater attachment will cause no loss of ecological function nor present any hazard to nearby property. The proposed use complies with the City of Tukwila Municipal Code 18.44.50.(B.1.p) described as support facilities for above or below ground utilities connecting AT&T's existing underground fiber optic cables, west of Interstate 5, to Interurban Avenue South, east of the Green River. NO NET LOSS AT&T's proposed bridge attachment over the Green River will have no net loss of ecological function. Unfortunately, there is no alternative route between the existing facilities on Southcenter Blvd., west of Interstate 5, and AT&T's existing facilities at Interurban Avenue South, without crossing the Green River. To minimize the impact on the Urban Conservancy environment, AT&T will utilize directional bores on the approaches to the river and minimal trenching from the manholes to the bridge attachment. Placing the manholes near the bridge abutments will reduce the amount of trenching to less than 15' on either side of the river. Additionally, the (2) 4" steel conduits will be painted according to the City of Tukwila bridge standards to minimize the visual impact from the Green River Walking Trail which passes under the Southcenter Boulevard Bridge. Once all manholes are in place and the sweeps to the bridge attachment are completed, the surrounding area will be reseeded and restored to the satisfaction of the City of Tukwila inspection and environmental personnel. Once the conduit and cable are in place over the river, AT&T does not anticipate regular maintenance to either manhole in the Urban Conservancy Buffer, as there will be no cable splice in these manholes. All erosion control BMPs will be used to contain the impact during the placement of the manholes and the trenching to the bridge, using silt fencing, staked hay bales and filter socks surrounding the work zone and removed when construction is complete. 50 Mall Road, Suite 203 Burlington, MA 01803 p 781.221.8400 f 781.221.7117 -"I CN(.INFFHIN(, (,HOUI. INC. The existing condition of the habitat and riverbank on the east shoreline of the Green River, along Southcenter Boulevard, has ivy and native blackberry vegetation, weeds and woody debris. The Green River Walking Trail is on the west side of the river and is presently closed. The west shoreline has the asphalt trail with adjacent grass on both sides and blackberries. The bank below the Walking Trail has been previously rehabilitated with a rock levee to protect the adjacent area from flooding. Both the manhole placement and the trenching will take place approximately 25' above the high higher water level of 11.60 feet. AT&T's proposed construction will not remove any vegetation, alter the river bank or add fill in the Green River shoreline jurisdiction. No new storm water will be discharged into the river because of the proposed bridge attachment. AT&T contractors are required to use Best Management Practices during all construction projects and will neither store nor use hazardous materials on this project. The bridge attachment will be over the water and properly permitted with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. The addition of the manholes to the shoreline jurisdiction represents minimal impact to the impervious surface on either side of the Green River. STATE � 4. k a N < � x v0 wyt 188s s STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 48AN'su JiV4 0-4 sd00 Northwest Regional Office • 3190 160th Ave SE • Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 • 425-649-7000 711 for Washington Relay Service • Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 September 27, 2012 Daniel McGeough AT&T 11241 Willows Road NE, Suite 130 Redmond, WA 98052 Re: City of Tukwila County Permit L12-022 - Approved AT&T - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SDP) 2012-NW-1423 Dear Mr. McGeough: On September 26, 2012, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Tukwila approved your application for an SDP. Your permit is for installation of an underground utility line within a public right of way and bridge on South Center Blvd. within shoreline jurisdiction of Green River. By law, local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with: • The Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) • Ecology's Substantial Development Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27-150 WAC) • The Tukwila Local Shoreline Master Program Local governments, after reviewing SDPs for compliance, are required to submit them to Ecology. Your approved SDP has been received by Ecology. What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you wait at least 21 days from September 26, 2012, the "date of filing". This waiting period allows anyone (including you) who disagrees with any aspect of this permit, to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recommend you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to ensure no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 664-9160 or http://www.eho.wa.gov/ Daniel McGeough September 27, 2012 2 of 2 If you want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact David Pater at (425) 649-4253. Sincere avid Pater, Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program DP:cja cc: Brandon Miles, City of Tukwila Community Development Dept. Cittt of J ahwita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Si nificance Determination of Significance & Scoping Short Subdivision Agenda Notice Notice of Application for x Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _25 day of -Sept--, 2012 Project Name: AT&T LINK 16 SOUTHCENTER BV BRIDGE OVER GREEN RIVER Project Number: PL12-023 Associated File Number s : L12-022 Mailing requested by: Brandon 'le Mailer's signature: I/ ��l , W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC AGENCY LABELS Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Corps of Engineers () US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) Federal HWY Admin () US Dept of HUD ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 () National Marine Fisheries Service ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology () 94t of Social & Health Services ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) �THORELINEpt of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. ( ) Dept of Natural Resources NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT ( )Office of the Governor W'O ptof Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically WA State Community Development fice of Attorney General ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office () Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12t' Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) KC Boundary Review Board () Health Department ( ) Fire District # 11 () Port of Seattle ( ) Fire District # 2 () KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div () KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation () KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Assessor's Office () KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) KC Public Library System O Westfield Mall Library ( ) Foster Library () Tukwila School District ( ) Renton Library () Highline School District ( ) Kent Library () Seattle School District ( ) Seattle Library () Renton School District Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) QWEST Communications () BP Olympic Pipeline () Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Seattle City Light () Val-Vue Sewer District () Allied Waste Services ( ) Puget Sound Energy () Water District # 20 ( ) Highline Water District () Water District # 125 ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept () City of Renton Public Works ( ) Comcast () Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Tukwila City Departments () Kent Planning Dept () Public Works ( ) Fire () Renton Planning Dept () Police ( ) Finance () City of SeaTac () Planning ( ) Building () City of Burien () Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor () City of Seattle () City Clerk () Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council O Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce () Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * () Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition ( ) Cultural Resources dy,�� h) () Washington Environmental Council Fisheries Program J)erJ p9h1{ Oi``, O People for Puget Sound ( ) Wildlife Program \ () Futurewise ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Seattle Times () Highline Times ( ) South County Journal () City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permit! SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) - Notice to DOE must be bV return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (printed out from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross -sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3-part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila To: Department of Ecology Department of Community Development ATTN: David Pater 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 Date of Transmittal: Type of Permit: September 21, 2012 Date of Receipt: Substantial Development (Tukwila Land Use File # L12-022) Local Government Decision: Approval with conditions Applicant Information: Name: Daniel McGeough Address: AT&T 11241 Willows Rd NE, Suite 130 Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: 425-896-9830 Is the applicant the property owner? NO Applicant's Representative: Name: Same Address: Same Location of the property: Right of Way of Southcenter Blvd Water Body Name: Green River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban Conservancy Description of Project: The proposed project involves AT&T working within the City's existing right of way of Southcenter Blvd to install an underground telecommunications line. Installation of conduit lines will occur within the right of way within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Additionally, conduit lines will be installed on the existing bridge span. Two small vaults will also be installed within existing right of way, but within the shoreline area. No vegetation will be removed within the shoreline nor will any work take place water ward of the OHWM. Notice of Application Date: August 3, 2012 Final Decision Date: September 21, 2012 By: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner, City of Tukwila Phone Number: (206) 431-3684 or Brandon.Miles@Tukwilawa.gov CPL Page 1 of 1 09/20/2012 1:52 PM H:\\Rainier Industries\Shoreline Cover Sheet City o0tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: h=://www.Tukw.ilaWA.Pov SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L12-022 Applied: 07/10/2012 Approved: 09/21 /2012 Expiration: 09/21 /2014 A permit is hereby granted to: AT&T LINK 16 to: The proposed project involves AT&T working within the City's existing right of way of Southcenter Blvd to install an underground telecommunications line. Installation of conduit lines will occur within the right of way within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Additionally, conduit lines will be installed on the existing bridge span. Two small vaults will also be installed within existing right of way, but within the shoreline area. No vegetation will be removed within the shoreline nor will any work take place water ward of the OHWM. Upon the following property: Address: Parcel Number: 0001 - Section/Township/Range: SOUTHCENTER BV BRIDGE OVER GREEN RIVER The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: All master program provisions ap to this development. Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions. 1: APPROVED WITH NO CONDITIONS. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project as approved and any conditions thereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173-14-090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). Pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 the decision by the City of Tukwila to issue this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may only be appealed to the Shoreline Hearing Board. Appeals must be filed with the Shorelines Hearing Board within 21-days from the filing of this permit with D.O.E. as defined in RCW 90.58.140. For morkdetail informatiog on appeals, refer to RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. �� Date: Jack PacA, ITiiectoYof Department of Community Development Construction must begin within 2 years from the effective date of the permit and be substantially completed within 5 years of the effective date of the permit. The effective date of a substantial development permit shall be the date of receipt as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6). doc: SHORELINE5 L12-022 Printed: 09-21-2012 e • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor • Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director MEMORANDUM September 18, 2012 TO: Jack Pace, Director FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner RE: Shoreline Permit: L12-022, Southcenter Blvd Bridge (over the Green River) 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project involves AT&T working within the City's existing right of way of Southcenter Blvd to install an underground telecommunications line. Installation of conduit lines will occur within the right of way within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Additionally, conduit lines will be installed on the existing bridge span. Two small vaults will also be installed within existing right of way, but within the shoreline area. No vegetation will be removed within the shoreline nor will any work take place water ward of the OHWM. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application and the site plans are found in Attachment A. BM Page 1 of 6 09/21/2012 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 e Fax: 206- 431-3665 L12-022-AT&T Conduit Line ,+ Shoreline Substantial Development September 20, 2012 Project Location 2. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM - BACKGROUND The City of Tukwila adopted a new Shoreline Master Program (SMP) on August 15, 2011, which was approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology on October 14, 2011 and became effective October 28, 2011. A. Shoreline Environment Designation The shoreline environment designation for the site is Urban Conservancy; the purpose of the Urban Conservancy Environment is to protect ecological functions where they exist in urban and developed settings, and restore ecological functions where they have been previously degraded, while allowing a variety of compatible uses. The proposed project will be working within the buffer of the shoreline. Pursuant to SMP 8.5.A.1.j, utilities are a permitted use within the shoreline zone. The telecommunications line will be placed within a conduit line which will be connecting to the existing Southcenter Blvd Bridge. The existing bridge, which is an over water structure, is permitted under SMP 8.5.A.1.j. B. Shoreline Goals and Policies: The following section discusses the Shoreline Master Program goals and policies that apply to this project and are excerpted from Chapter 6 of the City's SMP. Coal: Development along the shoreline that fosters the economic vitality of Tukwila while preserving the long-term benefits of the river. BM Page 2 of 6 09/21/2012 " L 1 022-AT&T Conduit Line ,Shoreline Substantial Development September 20, 2012 Response: The proposed project will place telecommunications line within existing right of way. The telecommunications line will be available to businesses throughout Renton, Tukwila, and south King County. Connecting the conduit lines to an existing bridge has no impacts to the River, while still allowing the conduit line to be installed. Goal 6.4 Private Property Rights Goal: Protect rights of property owners to reasonable use and enjoyment of private property, through appropriate location, access to, and design of shoreline uses. Response: As a utility, AT&T has the power to condemn property in order to install utility equipment. By placing the proposed telecommunications equipment within City right of way, it eliminates the need to place such equipment on private property. Goal 6.6 Access and Recreational Use Goal: Increase the amount and diversity of opportunities for public recreation and access to and along the river, including visual and cultural access, access to the water's edge, opportunities for small boat navigation and access, and connections to other neighborhood, consistent with the shoreline character. Response: The proposed project will have no impact on public access or recreational opportunities along the river. Goal 6.8 Historical Resource Use and Archaeological Protection Goal: Recognition of the river's contribution to Tukwila history and community identify through identification, enhancement, restoration, and protection of sites with historic and cultural value and through development of interpretative and educational programs. • Policy 5.8.3 Response: Placing the conduit line within the City's existing right of way and on an existing bridge eliminates the need to excavate in native soils, thus eliminating the chances that artifacts or sites will be disturbed. 6.9 Natural Environment and Habitat Use Goal: Restored, enhanced and protected natural environment resources along the river, including trees, wildlife habitat and features with value for long-term public, scientific and educational uses. Policy 5.9.1 Policy 5.9.2 Response: The applicant prepared a no net loss analysis (NNL), which is attached as part of Attachment B to this staff report. The NNL addresses the mitigation sequencing criteria in the SMP. Again, the applicant is proposing to install a conduit line on an existing bridge and install conduit lines below an BM Page 3 of 6 09/21/2012 L12-022-AT&T Conduit Line Shoreline Substantial Development September 20, 2012 existing roadway. This construction approach is the best possible alternative and does not have any impacts to the shoreline area. The NLL concluded by stating: 'AT&T's proposed construction will not remove any vegetation, alter the river bank or add fill in the Green River shoreline jurisdiction. No new storm water will be discharged into the river because of the proposed bridge attachment. AT&T contractors are required to use Best Management Practices during all construction projects and will neither store nor use hazardous materials on this project. The bridge attachment will be over the water and property permitted with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. The addition of the manholes to the shoreline jurisdiction represents minimal impact to the impervious surface on either side of the Green River." 6.10 Water Quality, Surface Water and Flood Control Use Goal: Improved water quality and quantity control programs affecting the Green/Duwamish River that improve the river's quality, provide habitat for fish and wildlife, protect public health and safety, and enhance public enjoyment of the river. Applicable Polices: • Policy 5.10.1 • Policy 5.10.03 Response: Placing the utility equipment within the existing right of way and connected to existing bridge eliminates all impacts to the shoreline associated with this project. No vegetation has to be removed and no grading has to be completed. Also, given that this is a telecommunciations line there is no risk of contamination by hazardous materials in the event that the line is damaged. 3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: TMC 18.44.130 B. 3. Shoreline Administration states that a substantial development permit shall be granted only when the development proposed is consistent with the shoreline master program. The relevant SMP policies were discussed above. Below is a discussion of the relevant shoreline master program regulations that are incorporated into the zoning code that apply to this permit application. A. Permitted Uses: TMC 18.44.060 identifies permitted uses in the Urban Conservancy environment and placement of utilities within the shoreline zone is permitted by TMC 18.44.060 (13)(1)(j). B. Development Standards TMC 18.44.070(C). establishes development standards for the Urban Conservancy shoreline environment. Under TMC 18.44.070 (13)(1)(c), utilities are required to be sufficiently screened when placed in the shoreline zone. AT&T meets this standard due to the fact that the BM Page 4 of 6 09/21/2012 1,12c022-AT&T Conduit Line ,Shoreline Substantial Development geptember 20, 2012 telecommunications line is being placed below ground and by connecting a conduit line to an existing bridge. C. Surface Water and Water Quality TMC 18.44.070 D provides development standards for shoreline development. The proposed project will have no impact to surface water quality. D. Landfill Activities: TMC 18.44.070(j), Development Standards (Section 9.11 of the SMP) addresses clearing, grading and landfill activities in the shoreline jurisdiction. There is no landfill activities proposed with this application. E. Vegetation Protection and Landscaping TMC 18.44.080 provides requirements for landscaping in both the buffer and non -buffer areas of the shoreline environment. No vegetation will be removed or impacted as a result of the proposed project. F. Public Access TMC 18.44.100 addresses public access requirement for the SMP. Public access is required when a development or use would create additional demand for public access through the addition of square footage to an existing building or the intensification in land use through the conversion of a warehouse to a retail or office use. This project will not create additional demand for public access as no additional square footage is being added to the building and the current use is not being converted to a more intense land use. G. Shoreline Design Guidelines This section of the TMC does not apply (TMC 18.44.110) as no structures are being constructed. 4. COMMENTS: A Notice of Application was distributed to potentially impacted agencies on August 3, 2012. A copy of the Notice of Application was also published in the Seattle Times. No comments were received. 5. SEPA: A Determination of Non -Significance was issued on September 20, 2012. A. copy of the SEPA determination and staff report are attached (Attachment Q. BM Page 5 of 6 09/21/2012 L 12-022-AT&T Conduit Line Shoreline Substantial Development September 20, 2012 CONCLUSIONS V ". 1. The project site is located within the existing right of way of Southcenter Blvd. The proposed project is consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed project is the installation of conduit lines within the City's existing right of way; placement of conduit lines on an existing bridge; and placement of two manholes in the existing right of way. 3. The shoreline environment designation for the project area is Urban Conservancy. Placement of utilities within the shoreline is permitted by TMC 18.44.060 (B)(1)(j). 4. By placing the project below ground, the proposed project meets the development standards of TMC 18.44.070 (B)(1)(c). 5. The proposed project is consistent with economic development and natural environment and habitat use goals and policies of the SMP. 6. The project has analyzed the no net loss provisions of the SMP and will avoid all direct impacts to the ecological processes of the shoreline. No vegetation will be removed nor will any grading activities occur within the shoreline area. 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the shoreline substantial development permit with no conditions. List of Attachments: A. Permit application and site plans B. No net loss analysis and critical area review C. SEPA determination, SEPA Staff Report and SEPA Checklist BM Page 6 of 6 09/21/2012 eit* qgufiw-da Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Teri Svedahl x Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Si nificance Determination of Significance & Scoping Short Subdivision Agenda Notice Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Sent electronically to Other: x DOE/SEPA Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _3rd day of _August , _2012 Project Name: AT&T Link Project Number: PL12-023 Associated File Number s : L12-022, L12-023, E12-006 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: /) VW W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES Z,) US Corps of Engineers () US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) Federal HWY Admin () US Dept of HUD ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 NNNational Marine Fisheries Service N) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 2 WASHINGTON ATE AGENCIES Office of Archaeology () Dept of Social & Health Services Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. Dept of Natural Resources ******* ( ) Office of the Governor Dept of Ecology, SEPA * ec ronically ( ) WA State Community Development () Office of Attorney Gener �WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office () Office of Hearing Examiner - WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 '10AI NV`f A%^ Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENQES ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Health Department ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) Fire District # 2 KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div () KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation () KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Assessor's Office KC Dept of Natural Resources. Andv Levesque Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) KC Public Library System () Westfield Mall Library ( ) Foster Library O Tukwila School District ( ) Renton Library () Highline School District ( ) Kent Library () Seattle School District ( ) Seattle Library () Renton School District ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast ( ) Tukwila City Departments () Public Works () Fire () Police () Finance () Planning () Building () Parks & Rec () Mayor O City Clerk Puget Sound Regional Council SW KC Chamber of Commerce Muckleshoot Indian Tribe ( ) Cultural Resources Fisheries Program Wildlife Program ) Duwamish Indian Tribe Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline () Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District () Allied Waste Services ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( )City of Renton Public Works Dist Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( )City of Seattle *Notice of all Seattle Related Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENQES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition ���-(t�°►� () Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Seattle Times () Highline Times ( ) South County Journal () City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist River PROJECT INFORMATION I AT&T Communication of the Pacific NW, Inc., has filed applications to install conduit lines within the existing right of way of Southcenter Blvd, generally between Interstate 405 and Interstate 5. The proposed work will require installing conduit lines on the Southcenter Blvd Bridge, which expands over the Green River. Work is also proposed within the buffer area of Cottage Creek, located near 6300 Southcenter Blvd. The applicant has filed the following applications with the City: Shoreline Substantial Permit, SEPA review, and Special Permission from the Director (working within the creek buffer). Permits applied for include: Shoreline Substantial Permit; SEPA Review; and Special Permission from the Director. Other known required permits include: Right of Way Use Permit Studies required with the applications include: None known at this time. An environmental checklist has been submitted with the studies identified above. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100; Tukwila, WA, 98188 or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M. on September 5, 2012. Comments may also be emailed to Brandon.Miles@Tukwilawa.gov. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-35 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the land use permits and the environmental review so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. If timely comments do not identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the anticipated determination the DNS will be issued without a second comment period. RECEIVED JUL 10 2012 ,rlJ';: �.. -+gcSy CITY OF TUKWILA N.\V- Department of Community Development Q ( 10 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Titkivila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 '` • itlt E-mail: Planning@tzik-vt,ilaiva.gov 1908 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-SHORE Planner: File Number: L- fv? .-:;z =--�L Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: �� Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: 671 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: AT&T Link 16 Tie -In Completion LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. Southcenter Blvd. bridge over the Green River LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this infa•mation may be found on your tar statement or NWMaps.net). Within public right of way PROJECT VALUE (PLEASE ATTACH DOCUMENTATION): DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Daniel J. McGeough-AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest Address: 11241 Willows Rd NE, Suite 130, Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: E-mail: Signatul (425)896-9830 FAX: (425)896-9931 CPL Page i of 14 W-.Umg Range Projcct,,Show ineNew Shoreline Pennitst4-11-12 SSDP 04/19/2012 1 1:09 AM COOKE SCIENTIFIC 4231 NE 110TH ST, SEATTLE, WA 98125 PHONE: (206) 695-2267 FAX: 206-368-5430 CS COOKESS@COMCAST.NET WWW.COOKESCIENTIFIC.COM Memorandum TO: Joe Agresta, Corliss Skov, Francis Patnode; Siena Engineering Group Inc., CC: Dan McGeough, ATT FROM: Sarah Spear Cooke DATE: June 14, 2012 SUBJECT: AT&T Link 16 Tie-in Completion Critical Areas Report This report should be viewed in relation to the accompanying set of CAD drawings for the alignment and the photos taken of each segment. I met Francis Patnode on March 27, 2012 to walk the proposed alignment for the AT&T Link 16 Tie An completion route to look for critical areas. We walked from the eastern -most section to the western -most segment. This report outlines my findings. The report follows from west to east because the CAD drawings have been prepared in sequence this way. The table identifies the photos salient to each CAD sheet and some narrative for the segment conditions. The location of the proposed cable is shown on each CAD sheets. In general it runs north of the centerline within the paved roadway except for where there is a manhole. Two creeks have been identified through this alignment in addition to the Green River). Gilliam Creek that has been culverted under 154t St north of Southcenter Blvd and Cottage Creek, also culverted under Southcenter Blvd on the northeast corner of the intersection with 62"d Ave S. Neither Creek will be impacted as the conduit will be directionally drilled above (Gilliam) or below (Cottage) the creek culverts. There will be no proposed impacts to the Green River as the Cable will be brought from the manhole to the location where it will be attached adjacent to the existing Time Warner cable, it will be attached the entire length of the bridge and then trenched and directionally drilled to the manhole on the other side. Any trenching will be backfilled and the area will be stabilized and restored to pre -construction condition. There are no other critical areas within or adjacent to the alignment. Table 1. Graphics by Cable Segment and Segment Notes RECEIVED JUL 3 0 20121 ITY DEVELOPMENT N Sheet # Photo # Comments on critical areas NG 605DN-051 P1, P2, P3 At terminus of this link to where the electrical box is. A lone quaking aspen sits by the power vault and box with some blackberries and a tall Oregon grape. This is NOT a drainage swale. NG 605DN-051 P4, P5, P6 15 overpass is all impervious surface and bearing walls. Some seepage emerges from the base of the walls and drains into a culvert in the middle of the overpass. NG 605DN-052 P7, P8, P9 15 overpass and dry roadside between entrance ramp for 15 and S Center BLVD. 2 culverts remove road drainage. One from S side that emerges from under the road and one on the north side of road. NG 605DN-053 P9, P10, P11 Dry roadside between entrance ramp for 15 and S Center BLVD. NG 605DN-054 P11, P12, P13 Dry roadside between entrance ramp for 15 and S Center BLVD. NG 605DN-055 P12, P13, P14 Lawn and sidewalk leading to on ramp for 15 NG 605DN-056 P14, P15, P16 Sheet crosses intersection with Macadam Rd. There is a drainage swale on the NW side of the street. This appears to be road runoff in a grass - lined swale and nothing more. NG 605DN-057 P15, P16 Parking and beauty bark and Driveway to developments NG 605DN-058 P15, P16 The Driveway access to businesses and parking and beauty bark and intersection NG 605DN-059 P17, P18, P19 Cottonwoods and ivy covered hillside W of 62" Ave S NG 605DN-060 P19, P20,P21 Cottonwoods and ivy covered hillside W of 62" Ave S, a few blackberries as we go further E NG 605DN-061 P21, P22 Cottonwoods and ivy covered hillside W of 62" Ave S, a few blackberries as we go further E NG 605DN-062 P22, P23, P24 Crossing Intersection w 62" Ave S to Tukwila City Hall. Cottage Creek comes down 62"d Ave S and enters a culvert on NE corner of this crossing. Cable line will be directionally bored under the creek and the manhole will be east of where the Creek is day -lighted. NG 605DN-063 P25, P26 Dry hillside with rock walls NG 605DN-064 P27, P28, 29 Driveway for business and ivy covered hillside NG 605DN-065 P30 Power vault and driveway lawn and parking NG 605DN-066 P31 West of intersection with 65 Ave S driveways, parking and lawns NG 605DN-067 P32 East of intersection with 65 Ave S with lawn NG 605DN-068 P33, P34 Ivy and blackberry covered hillside west of Green river NG 605DN-069 P35, P36 Rock wall and trail entrance for Green River park area. Asphalt and grass NG 605DN-070 P37, P38, P39, Green River crossing. Cable to be attached to P43 existing bridge and drilled and trenched to the manhole locations on either side of bridge NG 605DN-071 P40, P41, P42, East bank after Green River crossing. Manhole P44 would be drilled and trenched into this area within the 100-foot River buffer and area restored. The existing blackberry weeds lawn and debris are shown in the photos. NG 605DN-072 P45, P46 Overpass and lawn area with small wooded area to the north. NG 605DN-073 P46, P47 Terminus of AT&T cable for this project, northeast corner of the intersection of South Center Blvd. and Interurban Ave S Tukwila Link- 16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P1 look E across 53rd.JPG P3 culvert.JPG f- P2 Look W across Ord APG S.JPG ti P4 beneath 15 overpass seepage from bearing walls.JPG Tukwila Link-16 AT&T Cable Alignment March 2012 ` a .A0 �...- P6 culvert receiving seepage from walls beneath 15.JPG P8 culvert to receive drainage from N side of S Center BLVD.JPG —•.err P7 culvert receiving drainage from S side of S Center BLVDvia a culvert unde P9 look W towards 15 overpass.JPG Tukwila Link- 1 6 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P10 look E down on ramp for 15.JPG P12 Look E away from on ramp across roads shoring dry area N of sidewalk.JPG PI Look W down on ramp for 15.JPG PI Look W shwoing dry lawn area leading to onramp for 15.JPG Tukwila Link-16 AT&T Cable Alignment March 2012 i .. All" a:'•c:, _ ,��_� it { r.• F P15 Look E from Maccadam Rd. Intersection. Bark and parking.JPG P14 Dry lawn and blackberries and culvert on on -ramp shoulder far away from cable route.JPG P16 Look W toward Maccadam rd.JPG )16" A_ F� y y:. P17 Look E after drive E of maccadam mostly impervious few plantings..JPG Tukwila Link- 1 6 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P18 Look W past businesses and driveways.JPG P20 ivy covered hillside look W.JPG Mj -s 7 iRC�i 1 P19 look E Ivy covered hillside W of 62nd Ave S.JPG P21 Intersection w 62nd Ave S.JPG Tukwila Link-16 AT&T Cable Alignment March 2012 P24 Cottage Creek enters culvert N of road.JPG P23 Cottage Creek culvert crossing NE edge of intersection W 62nd Ave S..JP P25 look W rockwall and dry lawn.JPG Tukwila Link-16 AT&T Cable Alignment March 2012 P26 ivy covered rock wall look E.JPG P28 landscaping and driveway look E.JPG P27 Ivy covered rock wall look W.JPG P29 Ivy covered hillside and rockery E of driveway.JPG Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P30 Powervault and driveway.JPG A R P32 look E lawn area E of 65th Ave S.JPG P31 look W intersection with 6Sth AVE s.JPG P33 look W dry ivy and grass sovered hillside.JPG Tukwila Link- 16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P34 lawn and cement wall W of trail system for Green River.JPG P36 Probably manhole locaiton for cable top of bank above Green River.JPG P35 look W trail entrance for Green River park.JPG P37 Other cable line coming off bridge upper deck near to where AT&T cable ♦ �c.�, h . kip. ,�; r - / t '��_?� .fie ;fr '1Yr _ If AF 14 x e� 1s e � I• _• Tukwila Link-16 AT&T Cable alignment March 2012 P42 Existing manholes for other cables .JPG P44 look E lawn area where cable would travel after manhole.JPG P43 view under bridge showing existing cable attachment.JPG P45 Lawn and small wooded area E of overpass W of Interurban Rd..JPG Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P46 Look W from E terminus at overpass.JPG COOKE SCIENTIFIC GQ�P�OQ�+CS 4231 NE 110TH ST, SEATTLE, WA 98125 PHONE: (206) 695-2267 FAX: 206-368-5430 COOKESSQCOMCAST.NET WWW.COOKESCIENTIFIC.COM Memorandum TO: Joe Agresta, Codiss Skov, Francis Patnode; Siena Engineering Group Inc., CC: Dan McGeough, ATT FROM: Sarah Spear Cooke DATE: June 14, 2012 SUBJECT: AT&T Link 16 Tie-in Completion Critical Areas Report This report should be viewed in relation to the accompanying set of CAD drawings for the alignment and the photos taken of each segment. I met Francis Patnode on March 27, 2012 to walk the proposed alignment for the AT&T Link 16 Tie —In completion route to look for critical areas. We walked from the eastern -most section to the western -most segment. This report outlines my findings. The report follows from west to east because the CAD drawings have been prepared in sequence this way. The table identifies the photos salient to each CAD sheet and some narrative for the segment conditions. The location of the proposed cable is shown on each CAD sheet. In general it runs north of the centerline within the paved roadway except for where there is a manhole at which point the route jumps to what is usually grassed in area north of the sidewalk. Two creeks have been identified through this alignment (in addition to the Green River). Gilliam Creek passes under the 15 overpass along Southcenter Blvd (Sheet NG 605DN-051); and Cottage Creek, also culverted under Southcenter Blvd on the northeast corner of the intersection with 62Id Ave S (sheet NG 605DN-062). Neither Creek will be touched as the cable line will be directional drill -installed above Gilliam Creek and below Cottage Creek as they are carried in pipes below the sidewalk and road. There will be no proposed impacts to the Green River as a result of installing the AT&T cable as the Cable will be brought from the western manhole shown on sheet NG 605DN-070 to the location at the bottom of the bridge footing where it will be attached adjacent to the existing Time Warner conduit on the bridge, it will be attached along the entire length of the bridge, on the east side and then trenched to the manhole at the top of the slope (Sheet NG 605DN-071, Details on Sheet DT008). Any trenching will be backfilled with the same soil and the area will be stabilized and restored to pre -construction condition. Details can be seen on Sheet DT001. All required erosion control BMP's will be followed during the trenching and the areas will be restored to pre -construction existing conditions. Details of silt fencing can be seen on Sheets DT003 and DT004. Any vegetation disturbed will be replaced. There are no other critical areas within or adjacent to the alignment. Graphics by Cable Segment and Segment Notes (see attached photos) Sheet # Photo # Comments on critical areas NG 605DN-050, P1, P2, P3 At terminus of this link to where the electrical box 051, PT 003 is. A lone quaking aspen sits by the power vault and box with some blackberries and a tall Oregon grape. This is NOT a drainage swale. NG 605DN-052 P4, P5, P6 15 overpass is all impervious surface and bearing walls. Some seepage emerges from the base of the walls and drains into a culvert in the middle of the overpass. NG 605DN-052 P7, P8, P9 15 overpass and dry roadside between entrance NG 605DN-053 ramp for 15 and S Center BLVD. 2 culverts remove road drainage. One from S side that emerges from under the road and one on the north side of road. Gilliam Creek runs in a pipe under S Center BLVD below the 15 overpass. NG 605DN-053 P9, P10, P11 Dry roadside between entrance ramp for 15 and S Center BLVD. NG 605DN-054 P11, P12, P13 Dry roadside between entrance ramp for 15 and S Center BLVD. NG 605DN-055 P12, P13, P14 Lawn and sidewalk leading to on ramp for 15 NG 605DN-056 P14, P15, P16 Sheet crosses intersection with Macadam Rd. There is a drainage swale on the NW side of the street. This appears to be road runoff in a grass - lined swale and nothing more. NG 605DN-057 P15, P16 Parking and beauty bark and Driveway to developments . NG 605DN-058 P15, P16 The Driveway access to businesses and parking and beauty bark and intersection. NG 605DN-059 P17, P18, P19 Cottonwoods and ivy covered hillside W of 62" Ave S and the eastern edge of business driveway access. NG 605DN-060 P19, P20,P21 Cottonwoods and ivy covered hillside W of 62" Ave S, a few blackberries as we go further east. NG 605DN-061 P21, P22 Cottonwoods and ivy covered hillside W of 62" Ave S, a few blackberries as we go further east. NG 605DN-062 P22, P23, P24 Crossing Intersection w 62" Ave S to Tukwila City Hall. Cottage Creek comes down 62"d Ave S and enters a culvert on NE corner of this crossing. Cable line will be directionally bored over the piped creek, and the manhole will be east of where the Creek is day -lighted. NG 605DN-063 P25, P26 Dry hillside with rock walls along Southcenter Blvd. NG 605DN-064 P27, P28, 29 Driveway for business and ivy covered hillside NG 605DN-065 P30 Power vault and driveway lawn and parking NG 605DN-066 P31 West of intersection with 65 InAve S driveways, parking and lawns NG 605DN-067 P32 East of intersection with 65 Ave S with lawn and sidewalk. NG 605DN-068 P33, P34 Ivy and blackberry covered hillside west of Green River. NG 605DN-069 P35, P36 Rock wall and trail entrance for Green River park area. Asphalt and grass. NG 605DN-070 P37, P38, P39, Green River crossing. Cable to be attached to P43 existing bridge and drilled and trenched to the manhole locations on either side of bridge. NG 605DN-071 P40, P41, P42, East bank after Green River crossing. Manhole P44 would be drilled and trenched into this area within the 100-foot River buffer and area restored. The existing blackberry weeds lawn and debris are shown in the photos. The alignment is not in the roadway for this stretch. NG 605DN-072 P45, P46 Overpass and lawn area with small wooded area to the north. The alignment is not in the roadway for this stretch. NG 605DN-073 P46, P47 Terminus of AT&T cable for this project, northeast corner of the intersection of Southcenter BLVD and Interurban Ave South. The cable jumps from the lawn area across the intersection of Interurban Ave south and back into the lawn area where it meets the existing AT&T cable to Tacoma. P3 culvert.JPG Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P2 Look W across S3rd .JPG S.JPG P4 beneath IS overpass seepage from bearing walls.JPG Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 PI look E down on ramp for 13.JPG riz LOOK E away from on ramp across roads shwing dry area N of sidewalk.JPG PI Look W down on ramp for 15.JPG P13 Look W shwoing dry lawn area leading to onramp for 13.JPG Tukwila Link- 16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 PIS Look E from Maccadam Rd. Intersection. Bark and parking.JPG P14 Dry lawn and blackberries and culvert on on -ramp shoulder for away from cable route.JPG P16 Look W toward Maccadam rd.JPG P17 Look E after drive E of maccadam mostly impervious few plantings..JPG Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P18 Look W past businesses and driveways.JPG P20 ivy covered hillside look W.JPG PI look E Ivy covered hillside W of 62nd Ave S.JPG P21 Intersection w 62nd Ave S.JPG Tukwila Link- 16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P22 Look W from 62nd Ave S. ivy covered lawns.JPG P23 Cottage Creek culvert crossing NE edge of intersection W 62nd Ave S..JP q. dM P25--1ook W rockwall and dry lawn.JPG Tukwila Link-16 AT&T Cable Alignment March 2012 P26 ivy covered rock wall look E.JPG P28 landscaping and driveway look E.JPG ,z P271vy covered rock wall look W.JPG P291vy covered hillside and rockery E of driveway.JPG Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P30 Powervault and driveway.JPG 2012 13:11 P32 look E lawn area E of 65th Ave S.JPG P31 look W intersection with 65th AVE s.JPG P33 look W dry ivy and grass sovered hiliside.JPG Tukwila Link- 1 6 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P34 lawn and cement wall W of trail system for Green River.JPG P36 Probably manhole locaiton for cable top of bank above Green River.JPG P33 took W trail entrance for Green River park.JPG P37 Other cable line coming off bridge upper deck near to where AT&T cable Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P39 upper bridge dock. Cable to be pinned undemeath.JPG beidge.JPG Poi Cable pipe near where AT&T cable would be attached.JPG Tukwila Link-16 A T& T Cable Alignment March 2012 P42 Existing manholes for other cables .JPG P44 look E lawn area where cable would travel after manhole.JPG PG ,JPG Tukwila Link-16 AT&T Cable Alignment March 2012 P46 Look W from E terminus at overpass.JPG P47 Area where AT&T manhole and teminus would be situated.JPG City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director September 21, 2012 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: AT&T, Applicant City of Tukwila, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L12-02 Applicant: Daniel McGeough, AT&T Type of Permit Applied for: Special Permission from the Director for work within a watercourse buffer Project Description: AT&T has proposed to install an underground telecommunications fiber optic line within the existing right of way (ROW) of Southcenter Blvd. AT&T project will extend generally from Fort Dent Way to Interstate 5. As part of the project, AT&T will need to work within the buffer of Cottage Creek, which the City classifies as a type 3 stream'. The work in the buffer will include trenching, installation of the utility lines, and installation of a manhole structure. Location: Within the Right of Way near 6200 Southcenter Blvd Associated Files: L12-022, Shoreline Permit E 12-006, SEPA Review Comprehensive Plan Office (0) Designation/Zoning District: H. DECISION ' TMC 18.45.100 (A)(3) defines a Type 3 Watercourse as those watercourses that have perennial flows and do not meet the criteria of a Type F (Type 2) stream or have been proven not to contain fish using methods described in the Forest Practices Board Manual Section 13. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS). Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Special Permission from the Director does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved with the application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. The following condition applies to the project: 1. The buffer area shall be hydro seeded with grass upon completion of the work within the buffer area. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. If an MDNS was issued, any person wishing to challenge either the conditions which were imposed by the MDNS decision or the failure of the Department to impose additional conditions in the MDNS must raise such issues as part of the appeal to the Hearing Examiner. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by October 5, 2012. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: l . The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing parry's behalf. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. BM Page 2 of 3 E] Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles who may be contacted at (206) 431-3684 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period if no appeal is filed. X1�4 - - -,1411 Nora Gierloff, Deputy Dire Department of Community Development City of Tukwila BM Page 3 of 3 . 1 a City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor • Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director MEMORANDUM September 21, 2012 TO: Jack Pace, Director FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner RE: AT&T, Special Permission Application, L12-023 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT&T has proposed to install an underground telecommunications fiber optic line within the existing right of way (ROW) of Southcenter Blvd. AT&T project will extend generally from Fort Dent Way to Interstate 5. As part of the project, AT&T will need to work within the buffer of Cottage Creek, which the City classifies as a type 3 watercourse'. The work in the buffer will include trenching, installation of the utility lines, and installation of a manhole structure. A site plan showing the proposed work is included with this staff report as Attachment "A". The work is located adjacent to 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The buffer area where AT&T will be working is already significantly degraded. The area of the buffer that will be impacted is currently planted with non-native, ornamental grass. AT&T will place their manhole structure next to an existing City of Tukwila fiber optic vault. A Metro Bus stop and other utility vaults are located west of the City's existing fiber optic vault. 3. TUKWILA'S WATERCOURSE AND BUFFER REGULATIONS The City's regulations regarding watercourses and their buffers are found in TMC 18.45. Generally, impacts to buffers are to be avoided and when the impacts are unavoidable mitigation is to be provided. ' TMC 18.45.100 (A)(3) defines a Type 3 Watercourse as those watercourses that have perennial flows and do not meet the criteria of a Type F (Type 2) stream or have been proven not to contain fish using methods described in the Forest Practices Board Manual Section 13. BM Page 1 of 09/21/2012 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206- 431-3665 L12-023 TMC 18.45.070 (B) outlines permitted uses within all sensitive areas, including watercourse buffers. Essential utilities, such as the fiber optic line proposed by AT&T, are permitted within the buffer area provided the following criterion, found in TMC 18.45.070 (13)(5), are met: a. Essential utilities must be constructed to minimize, or where possible avoid, disturbances of the sensitive area and its buffer; b. All construction must be designed to protect the sensitive area and its buffer against erosion, uncontrolled storm water, restriction of groundwater movement, slides, pollution, habitat disturbance, any loss of flood capacity and storage capacity, and excavation or fill detrimental to the environment; c. Upon completion of the installation of essential utilities, sensitive areas and their buffers must be restored to pre -project configuration, replanted as required and provided with maintenance care until newly planted vegetation is established. In addition, mitigation to offset impacts to sensitive areas or their buffers must be carried out in accordance with the standards and mitigation ratios of this Chapter; and d. All crossings must be designed for shared facilities in order to minimize adverse impacts and reduce the number of crossings. 4. REVIEW OF APPLICABLE CRITERION The individual criteria listed in TMC 18.45.070(B)(5) is listed below with staffs response. The applicant has not provided a response to the criterion. a. Essential utilities must be constructed to minimize, or where possible avoid, disturbances of the sensitive area and its buffer. Cottage Creek will not be impacted by the proposed AT&T project. Work in the buffer area will be limited to installation of utility lines and placement of a manhole structure. No trees or vegetation within the restored buffer will be removed as a result of this project. Nonnative grass will be removed in order to complete the project. During construction a silt fence will be installed in order to eliminate impacts to the adjacent stream and buffer area. While avoidance of the buffer disturbance is preferred, in this case it is not practical given that AT&T will be placing the fiber optic line within the ROW of Southcenter Blvd. Roadways are also permitted within buffers areas (TMC 18.45.070 (13)(6)). Placement of the utility line in other areas of the roadway is not practical due to conflicts with other utilities. b. All construction must be designed to protect the sensitive area and its buffer against erosion, uncontrolled storm water, restriction of groundwater movement, slides. pollution, habitat disturbance, any loss of flood capacity and storage capacity. and excavation or fill detrimental to the environment. The proposed AT&T project is a minor construction project that will have no impact on the surrounding area. The project is required to obtain a construction permit from the City's Public Works Department and through that permit construction impacts will be minimized. A silt fence will be installed to reduce erosion during construction. After construction, the project area will be returned to its pre -project condition. BM Page 2 of 4 09/21/2012 r - L 12-023 �_.. C. UDon comBletion of the installation of essential utilities. sensitive areas and their buffers must be restored to pre -project configuration, replanted as required and provided with maintenance care until newly planted vegetation is established. In addition, mitigation to offset impacts to sensitive areas or their buffers must be carried out in accordance with the standards and mitigation ratios of this Chapter. As stated, the project area is already significantly degraded. The applicant will not be removing any trees, shrubs or groundcover. The only vegetation that will be removed is nonnative, ornamental grass. The applicant has not proposed to reseed the area following completion of the construction project. A condition has been added to address this oversight. The completion of additional mitigation measures (i.e. plantings) would not be proportional to the impacts generated by the utility installation. Additionally, any mitigation plantings would likely have to be removed with the future expansion of Interstate 405. d. All crossings must be designed for shared facilities in order to minimize adverse impacts and reduce the number of crossings. This criteria is not applicable. AT&T is not proposing any crossings of Cottage Creek. 5. COMMENTS A Notice of Application was distributed to potentially impacted agencies on August 3, 2012. A copy of the Notice of Application was also published in the Seattle Times. No comments were received. S. SEPA A Determination of Non -Significance was issued on September 20, 2012. 6. CONCLUSIONS 1. The project is the installation of an essential utility, which is permitted within sensitive area buffers pursuant to TMC 18.45.070 (B) (5). 2. The project will not impact Cottage Creek or the recently completed buffer enhancement. 3. No trees, shrubs, or native groundcover will be removed. 4. The project area is already significantly degraded and the completed project will not alter the current condition of this portion of the buffer. 5. Nonnative grasses are proposed to be removed as part of the project. TMC 18.45.070 (B) (5) (c) requires that the buffer area be restored to its pre -project condition. This can be accomplished by replanting grass upon completion of the work within the buffer area. BM Page 3 of 4 09/21/2012 L12-023 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the special permission application with the following condition: 1. The buffer area shall be hydro seeded with grass upon completion of the work within the buffer area. List of Attachments: A. Permit application and site plan. BM Page 4 of 4 09/21/2012 RECEIVED JUL 3 0 2012 CITY OF TUK"LA COa ",, T r Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planninaa,TukwilaWA.gov SPECIAL PERMISSION - DIRECTOR FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type. P-SP Planner: File Number: Application Complete Date: Project File Number: ^. Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: ZZ. NAME OF PROJECUDEVELOPMENT• AT&T Link 16 Tie -In Completion LOCATION OF PROJECUDEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. Southcenter Boulevard at Cottage Creek, east of 62nd Avenue S. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). Not applicable. Project is entirely within public rights of way. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Daniel J. McGeough - AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. Address: 11241 NE Willows Road, Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: (425) 896-9830 E-mail: dm2124@att.com Signature: FAX: (206) 505-5050 Date: HN-and Use Applications in PDFISpecial Permission Director -March 201 Ldoc RECEIT JUL 30 20121 NA EVF_L NtEi( pCOM OPMENT IE July 26, 2012 Mr. Jack Pace, Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Proposed AT&T/City of Tukwila Conduit and Manhole Placement Southcenter Boulevard at Cottage Creek — Tukwila, WA Dear Mr. Pace: On behalf of AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. (AT&T) and pursuant to TMC 18.45.070, 1 am requesting Special Permission to place telecommunications conduit and manholes within the right-of-way limits of Southcenter Boulevard and within the 80-foot buffer of Cottage Creek, just east of 62"d Avenue S. We anticipate that the proposed construction and use at this location qualifies as "essential utilities". The proposed project involves the placement of approximately six thousand (6,000) feet of underground telecommunications conduit, manholes/handholes and cable to connect existing AT&T and City facilities on Southcenter Boulevard for the purpose of providing telecommunications services. There will be a total of six conduits placed, four for AT&T and two for the City of Tukwila. At various points along the route, manholes or handholes for AT&T and the City will be placed to assist with cable placement and to allow for future access. For your review and records, I have enclosed two copies of an overview map of the entire project and a detailed plan (Sheet NG 606DN 062) showing the proposed construction at Cottage Creek as well as a copy of the Critical Areas Report prepared by Cooke Scientific. The excavation within the Cottage Creek buffer is anticipated to be completed within two days and trenches will be back -filled with the existing soil and seeded with a pasture grass mix. All BMP soil erosion control practices will be followed during construction. Prior to construction, AT&T's contractor will install all appropriate erosion control devices as shown on the plans. We appreciate your assistance and guidance in this matter and look forward to your response. 1 have also included our check in the amount of $1,435.00 in payment of the fee. Should you have any questions or require more information, please contact me. Sincerely, Siena Engineering Group Agresta President Enclosures Cc: D. McGeough (AT&T) 50 Mall Road, Suite 203 Burlington, MA 01803 p 781.221.8400 f 781.221.7117 I� 8 kY ', V EXISTING LINK 16 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. FIBER CABLE EXISTING AT&T SPLICE HH#19 STA.289+50 PROPOSED AT&T MANHOLE STA.299+28 EXISTING SUMNER TO SEATTLE FIBER CABLE • y !"Noll .: t f/ t N M W O C LT O I 3 V RECEIVED a �ectend J 3 PLAN PAGE JUL 3 0 201214 ` v a " EXISTING AT&T MANHOLES t. 0 F f$ MMLINiTY ° 3 M m OistOPlytENT Z o PROPOSED AT&T MANHOLE W ~ N PROPOSED AT&T CABLE & CONDUIT Z C N N g EXISTING AT&T CABLE & CON DUIT a�;;� 0 [n�wa PROPOSED AT&T MANHOLE STA.342+70 RI EXISTING BELLUVUE TO TACOMA FIBER CABLE J PROPOSED AT&T MANHOLE i T, i a. 321+36 STA.• STA. 331+09 ri �.t `• S, i' ;r Y �yi1 r r � �3 •° `s t ... •` �" .. f � *. i ; � aa."i .� T ,. — *'kt ',ati, 71 IF i� eet Fimgmk &IN►01 Y. HEREON, E UTI ACC0NES, ASS AVN HERE 1. WRSURFACE UTILITYLINES,GTO AVAILABLE W RECOSUBSURFACE RE CORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO R' RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN 2. REFE R TO PLANS TITLED NEXGEN LINK 16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS MT TO SEATTLE, +S WA,SEATELL 02 WASHINGTON RA. RES3206 - ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT 01-WAY AND /\/ (�E TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, N V i PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRRM SURVEYING INC. 4. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL. EXISTING AT&T JCT. SPLICE MH#359 STA.348+89 (SUMNER TO SEATTLE STA. 1177+38 BELLEVUE TO TACOMA STA. 1080+00) PROPOSED AT&T MANHOLE STA.339+53 EXISTING SUMNER TO SEATTLE FIBER CABLE ` Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 AT&T PROPRIETARY (Internal Use Only) Not for disclosure outside the AT&T _ companies, except underwritten agreement. ' 2012 AT&T Intellectual Property, All Rights Reserved AT&T PROPRIETARY -This information constitutes confidential trade secrets and commercial or financial information owned by AT&T and is shared for Critical Infrastructure Protection purposes only. It is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act IS U.S.C. 552), Exemptions (b)(3)&l and Its disclosure is prohibited under the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905), the Critical Infrastructure Information Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. 133, and any State or local law requiring disclosure of Information or records. This Information must not be copied or distributed to others not agreed upon by AT&T, but in all events do not copy or distribute to such others without notification pursuant to Executive e 0. S.. PREPARED FOR RECORD _ APPROVED FOR OUTSIDE PLANT ENGINEER DATE at&t COMPANY INSTRUCTIONS LINE CODE: CABLE CLLI: STTLWAU9771 j.^ SCALE: 1•' = 500• NEXGEN LINK 16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEM SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TIE-IN SITE PLAN PT003 ti 3 amain M H .. 0�h°n U Y N N Z�y F - N LU Vf Z C N N J > z 'D coo aNv w zn::x in.NHw02 - ►; t`Alt l ..A ?4 I' 1: r. 9 s ,4 ; ,. .09 _ PROPOSE \� 6' oo \1P �� o� A FENCE. REFDER SILT w CITY OF TUKWILA `\ °'2 ��� \ �'o `�`�� DT004. Z KING COUNTY - o G��� F '` r `l _j 20• `\ 7/ ��� \\ \\ TMH CULVERT WASHINGTON 14 IF 14" \\ C'G \\ _ TMH s P V \ T M TMH T T;_-- T---- \\ \_ TMH TMH \ ED E --- E --- E -----" - - Et-�---- E----•.'�-E — --'�- E -- E — E --liE—�-_. ------- SMH --- E E _ _ E ---- E ------ CONCRETE CURB & £ GUTTER CB jr!L---------- - 1UNE21,2012PERMRISWE 2 IULY 25.2012 REVISED PERMIT ISSUE j: .'. 4% NOTES: 1 SUMIUACE UTIUTYLWES,ASSHOWN HEREON, j WERE COMPILEOACCORUING TO AVAIUMLE • RE CORD INFORIATKINFROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIE5 AND PUSUC AGENOES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROxIAFATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD SIEN I ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBRTFY f0A DAMAGES INCURRED A5 A RESULT Oi UTILmE50MITTEO OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2 REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEXGEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDF SYSTEMS&LUNGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINMON HA. BES320G ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMBER X05, RY POWER, ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RxsHT-OF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SuRS'EY scuTHCENTER BOULEVARD, BANS DATED05/09/12 GY PRUM SURVEYING INC A MRW PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM F CFOMETRY INTERNATIp1A1. Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 EXISTING TUKWILA FIBER OPTIC VAULT AT&T PROPRIETARY (Internal use Only) — PROPOSED AT&T MANHOLE '� Not for disclosure outside the AT&T 4'x4'x4' (444—LA) ` companies, except under written IRRIGATION agreement. STA. 321 +41 VALVE O PROPOSED 7_0tr �2 O 'V 2012 AT&T Intellectual Property, All Rights Reserved BORE PIT I N AT&T PROPRIETARY -This information ��� Ar�N "J constitutes confidential trade secrets and ` I commercial or financial information owned \•J \ I �� by AT&T and Is shared for Critical -----_--- Infrastructure Protection purposes only. It is cc c. S W —a - exempt from disclosure under the Freedom _ -- - _ - - - - - - -- of Information Act (S U.S.C. 552), 7'"=E=-L - -- - - _ _ _ _ ---1-7 == Exemptions (b)(3)&(4), and its disclosure is E ' _ CC B E-- ----i-�- E-�- 1---- E-_ _ _ T E - - - -- - - - - prohibited under the Trade Secrets Act _---- _ --- -- (18U.S.C. 1905), the Critical Infrastructure - - - — Information Act of 2002 6 U.S.C.133 and ----- ----- 1 1 _ — 320+00 WG 12 eJr - - W _. _ - - W J� any State or local law requiring disclosure of FF��A1 --w -----w—L----w-----tv — —mow — ----w ---w --- WG w --- 00 information or records. This information must not be co led or distributed to other• 3.o' `HAZARDo Q \o SEWER & STORM y SOUTHCENTER BLVD. `\ Z CD DRAIN LINES SAN-- SAN__- SAN___�..1a+_-- SAN--- U SAN_-- SAN-_- SAN__- o PROPOSED (4) LINK 16 DO rn 4 & (2) CITY OF TUKWILA =tr' HAZARD SMH C" 2" CONDUITS BY Q WA TER LINES DIRECTIONAL BORE 0 0 R/W WIDTH PERMITS TRENCH DETAILS BORE TO SEATTLE, WA to do I O z � 0 a + O z Q 0 ~ Cf) W W In FOR DIRECTIONAL BORE PROFILE SEE SHEET PP062 CC=883' \ p PROPOSED SILT not agreed upon by AT&T, but in all events \ SACK IN EXISTING do not copy or distribute to such others \ CATCH BASIN. without notification purwant to Executive Order 12600. O\ REFER TO DT003. PREPARED FOR RECORD Z SAN-- < I I SAN - - - SAN - - - APPROVED FOR Q + SAN .- - - -�-j—SAN _ - _ II OUTSIDE PLANT ENGINEER DALE m °2 HAZARD _ Q COMMUNICATION & � at8ct N ELECTRIC LINES BORE I DT002 "B" 2" SDR-11 HDPE 319+50 321+17 16 7' (4) 2" HDPE (AT&T) (2) 2" HDPE (CITY) DIRECTIONAL BORE PROPOSED AT&T + FIBERGLASS MH N 4'x4'x4' r7 5V STA. 321+41 R/W WIDTH, PERMITS PROPRIETARY DT002 "B" BORE TRENCH DETAILS SPECIFCATONtOMPANYNINSTRUCTIONS 9 co S TO TUKWILA, WA M PROJECT NUMBER 8657594 EO OWNERSHIP: � LINE CODE: O Q CABLE CLU: STTLWAU9771 to -I- U7 SCALE: V = 20' O CC=968' CN NExGEN LINK 15 2" SDR-11 HDPE 2" SDR-11 HDPE 2" SDR-11 HDPE z 321+17 321+43 321+55 < LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEM 321+39 321+55 322+00 SOUTHCENTERBLVD.TIE-IN 22' 12' 45' N in W W CABLE AND CONDUIT (4) 2" HDPE (AT&T) (4) 2" HDPE (AT&T) (4) 2" HDPE (AT&T) Cf) PLACEMENT PLAN (2) 2" HDPE (CITY) (2) 2" HDPE (CITY) (2) 2" HDPE (CITY) TRENCH TRENCH DIRECTIONAL BORE NG 605DN-062 p1w I ?w " 0 11 E a b / s' Z !� E T. 75 z< Zn wE vi U 0,� \hM If,p.w„ i8 iLt4 }ply M F'aR PaR FLCf LOCUS MAP NOT TO SCALE SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TIE-IN PROPOSED CONDUIT PLACEMENT PLANS CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON KING COUNTY PERMIT ISSUE JULY 187 2012 IENA 0 �+ 50 Mall Road, Suite 203, Burlington, MA 01803 RECEIVED p 781.221.8400 f 781.221.7117 VI li JUL 26 20121 l� 40011 L COMMUNITY LIE DATE: 1AULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE 3 d� 0 � I L� s LIST OF DRAWINGS COVER PT001 .................... LIST OF DRAWINGS PT002 .................... LEGEND DN069 TO DN071........... PROPOSED CONDUIT DRAWING PP069 TO PP071 ........... PROFILE DRAWINGS DT001 .................... TYPICAL TRENCH AND SURFACE RESTORATION DETAILS DT002 .................... TYPICAL CONDUIT ARRANGEMENT DETAILS DT003 .................... TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL DETAILS DT004 .................... TYPICAL HAYBALE PLACEMENT DETAILS DT005 .................... MANHOLE 444-LA DETAILS DT006 .................... MANHOLE 444 FIBERGLASS DETAILS DT007 .................... MANHOLE 25-TA DETAILS DT008 .................... MANHOLE GROUNDING DETAILS DT009 .................... GREEN RIVER BRIDGE PLAN AND PROFILE DT010 .................... GREEN RIVER BRIDGE BRACKET DETAILS DT011 - DT012 ............. GREEN RIVER TYPICAL SEISMIC BRACE DETAILS DT013 .................... GREEN RIVER TYPICAL EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS DT014 - DT015 ............. MANHOLE ARRANGEMENT DETAILS 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORDINFORMATIONFRON THEREFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBUC AGENGES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TIT LED NEXGEN UNK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON ETA BES32M ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PlAN5 TITLED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. d. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL. Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 DT016 - DT017 ............. MANHOLE BUTTERFLY DETAILS SIENA DT018 .................... CABLE PLACEMENT DIAGRAM ECE1 E JUL .2 6 20121 A■■ O V V� V COUNITY �` DEVEMMLOPMENT 15 v SCALE: V = 20' SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA PROPOSED CONDUIT DRAWING PT001 I.IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE 41_0 UTILITY POLE W/LIGHT UP -O UTILITY POLE UTILITY POLE ANCHOR a PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER TRANSMISSION TOWER © POWER VAULT GM F0_1 GAS METER GG M GAS VALVE T❑ TELEPHONE RISER m TELEPHONE VAULT TMH O TELEPHONE MANHOLE GP 0 GUARD POST WM ® WATER METER HYD /Q 2—NOZZLE FIRE HYDRANT HYD Q 3—NOZZLE FIRE HYDRANT GATE/GENERAL CO 0 SEWER CLEAN OUT SMH O SEWER MANHOLE DMH 0 DRAIN MANHOLE CB ❑ CATCH BASIN —W — WATER LINE ----- c GAS LINE — E ---- BURIED ELECTRIC LINE E OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE T---- BURIED TELEPHONE LINE T OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE SAN--- SANITARY SEWER LINE c n �I �s Z .y � n a Z¢ z a w � ¢ w w% Vl U LEGEND TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE W/LUMINARE O TRAFFIC SIGNAL SUPPORT POLE FLASHING WARNING SYSTEM ® JUNCTION BOX LI-- R/R CROSSING GATE R/R CROSSING SIGNAL ® SIGNAL CONTROLLER o� SIGN BRIDGE CANTILEVERED SIGN SINGLE POST DOUBLE POST ❑a COUNTY ROAD es INTERSTATE HIGHWAY za STATE HIGHWAY ss US HIGHWAY f TRAFFIC FLOW ® M W MONITORING WELL ----so— STORM DRAIN LINE RAILROAD TRACKS TV OVERHEAD CABLE TV LINE DITCH VEGETATION LINE TREE LINE Q SURVEY ANGLE POINT B EXISTING SPLICE MANHOLE 1.V'SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE BENCH MARK Q PROPOSED MANHOLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPSURVEY LOCATIONSSANDP ME APPROMMATE ONLYBUC AGENCIES,.AACTUALR LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. 0 SURVEY IRON PIPE 0 PROPOSED TUKWILA MANHOLE SIENA ENGINEERING FOR DAMAGEGR S RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTIUTIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. ® MONUMENT (IN CASE) 2. REFERTOPLANSTIT EDNEKGENUNK16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA, BES3206 /� MONUMENT (SURFACE) ENGINE ISSUED NTENAN[E SEPTEMBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS, 3. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-0-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVLSOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLAINS DATED OS/09/12 BY PRIM VEYINGINC. BUS BUS STOP A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHYOBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL oMB MAIL BOX RIP RAP ROCKERY SHRUBBERY SIGN CONIFER TREE DECIDUOUS TREE YARD LIGHT I' WETLAND -�� WATER FLOW 0 0 0 GUARD RAIL EXISTING CONDUIT x FENCE PROPOSED CONDUIT RETAINING WALL PROPOSED TUKWILA CONDUIT — — RIGHT OF WAY LINE / ------------ PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL — — — — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE Call before you dig. CENTER !LINE Washington Utilities — — — — — — — — — — UNPAVED 'DRIVEWAY Coordinating Council ,L3 4-5555 — — — — — — — — — — UNPAVED ROAD 1-800-42 S11E1NA PL SCALE: 1" = 20' RECEIVED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD JUL 26 20121 TUKWILA, WA COMMUNITY PROPOSEDDRAWING CONDUIT DEVELOPMENT [--PT002 ISSUE DATE: ?, a V 1.IULY 16, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE w �:n V. NOTES: - ..> - 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES.AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE t RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED_ COMPANIES MOP UBUC AGENCIES, AND THEIR IONS ARE APP LOCATIONS ONLY. ACTUAL SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPOLOCATIONS MUST BE DAMAGES IN IN THE AS A RESPONSIBILITYTIER DAMAGES INCURRED — s -- - f AA RESULT Of UTIlR1ES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NE%GEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA. SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BES3206 Af ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMBER 2OD5, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 11 1 1 / RIGHT-OOUTHCE TER AND 3. REFER TOPLANS SURVEY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTNCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATEDOS/09/12 BY PRU M SURVEYING INC. A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL ,_ aTY OF 7UKMALA o ��, a KING COUNTY WASHINGTON i + n \\ ? `� APPROX. RAW / rn 19F f' ',- E -_ � APPROX. R/W CONCRETE , _ — ,g• - E _ �-- --� \ RETAINING WALL _S CB E -- f ��--�_ E -__ _ — '-SD- --- O O I _-- _SAIv SMH " f ��� / - - CONCRETE SIDEWALK E ----- E ----- i CB G O _ 12.5�e _ CONCRETE CURB E _- - ---- ��> —_''EKG'--_' \ __ _J w ` / / \ &GUTTER — G /' `w E ------ E338+O0 -- -_-_�—pp_ G .. _--W W - .. -W ( 11.0' _G 1 1 _ 1 o/ W _ W _G—�_- l 11 I /�'/ 0 CAS = 0 / - -w - '- —W L 0� CONCRETE + `: Zto _ — �W —� °tO' SOUTHCENTER El BRIDGEo`` fN DECK 1 r — Q q q m M / PROPOSED (4) LINK 16 1r 1 r m M p �� ELECTRIC & GAS LINES v" & (2) CITY OF TUKWILA —� 1 _� 1- J1 HAZARD to a / v N 2" CONDUITS BY DIRECTIONAL BORE TRAFFIC SIGNAL STORM DRAIN LINES N It LOOPS, TYP. 1� before15 Call dig. R/W WIDTH R/W WIDTH you WashingtonUtillit es PERMITS PERMITS "6" Coordinating Council TRENCH DETAILS BORE BORE DT001 TRENCH DETAILS 1-800-424-5555 TO SEATTLE, WA FOR DIRECTIONAL BORE PROFILE SEE SHEET PP069 TO TUKWILA, WA 1EINA 000 o C) 0) 0 00 o . m Z + CC=844' + Z 0) SCALE: 1" = ZD' 2" SDR-11 HDPE 2" SDR-11 1`7 0 HDPE SOUTHCENTER n 337+00 339+41 o BOULEVARD w Q 339+0 �+ E`'� RECEI3f GV 339+50 a w TUKWILA, WA Uj � 241' 9' N N (4) 2" HDPE 'JUL 2 6 2012: (4) 2" HDPE w PROPOSED CONDUIT DRAWING (2) 2" HDPE DIRECTIONAL BORE COMMUNITY (2) 2" HDPE �•` � MOU01 nPMFMT TRENCH DN069 v a 0 8 771 3 a y n d a GnN 01 N--0 0 C r N �v 17t-0 .+ N N Z C T !. i0-- '0 Z ti W W 0 Ln.N.wS APPROX. / R/W / W � / / c+r i <C r Z m _ I L PROPOSED RECEIVING PIT 16'x8.5' PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MH 4'x4'x4' STA, 339+53 PROPOSED TUKWILA FIBER OPTIC VAULT 5'x2' (25-TA) PROPOSED SILT FENCE. REFER TO L DT004. `2.0' ---b4- ---w - _ - 0- CONCRETE m� BRIDGE o DECK a� R/W WIDTH PERMITS TRENCH DETAILS DT001 "6" TO QC- ATTLEI WA PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MH 4'x4'x4' STA. 339+53 Cn O �If) z + o0') 1'7 (.7 M 0 Li Q Li ~ Cf)N O - HAZARD WATER, ELECTRIC & �_� CITY OF 'NKNALA D COMMUNICATION LINES �`"�' KING COUNTY N WASHINGTON /o = o Z PROPOSED BRIDGE ATTACHMENT / rr (2) 4- HOT DIP GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUITS W/ t (4) LINK 16 INNERDUCTS & / O (2) CITY OF TUKWILA INNERDUCTS O ( Q �� (SEE SHEETS DT009 TO DT013) CONCRETE w �4 F RAIL 341+00 T i O � w ----w -----w -----w -- - f w ---- / ( / CONCRETE _ )� 7 p BRIDGE TRAFFIC 4 COLUMNS TRAFFIC / SIGNAL (BELOW) SIGNAL ( LOOPS / LOOPS _ ) / DT001 "6" BRIDGE ATTACHMENT rn 50' CC=844' f� ,y l 7C 2" SDR-11 HDPE 4" STEEL 339+55 339+55 339+73 339+73 18, 18' (4) 2" HDPE (4) 4" STEEL (2) 2" HDPE (2) 4" STEEL TRENCH TRENCH CONCRETE SIDEWALK --w -----w -----w -----w -- CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SOLITHCENTER CONCRETE BLVD. BRIDGE I COLUMNS CONCRETE BRIDGE (BELOW) , DECK 4" HOT DIP GALVANIZED STEEL 339+73 342+00 227' (1) H.D.G. STEEL W/ (3) 1-1/4" INNERDUCTS (1) H.D.G. STEEL W/ (1) 1-1/4" INNERDUCTS , (2) 1-1/4" INNERDUCTS BRIDGE ATTACHMENT IBC R/W WIDTH PERMITS BRIDGE ATTACHMENT TRENCH DETAILS TO TUKWILA, WA RECEIVED 'JUL' 2 6 20121 DEVELOPN�T 1.IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE 1. SUBSURFACE UTTURY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBUC AGENCIES, MID THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIMLM FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TIRED NO(GEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA, SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON RA SES3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPFEMRER 2OD5, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TfI1E0 RIGHT-OF-WAYAND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PUNS GATED 05/09/12 BY PRIM SURVEYING INC. K. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMEFRY INTERNATIONAL • Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 MENA 0O � o eW� m.W .m SCALE: V - 20' + Z N 0 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD Q w TUKWILA, WA Cn Coo PROPOSED CONDUIT DRAWING ® DN070 PROPOSED BRIDGE ATTACHMENT (2) 4" HOT DIP GALVANIZED RIGID PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MH PROPOSED SILT FENCE. C11Y OF �j(VA� r, D _ STEEL CONDUITS W/ 4'x4'x4' REFER TO OT004 KING COUNTY o 0 D (4) LINK 16 INNERDUCTS & STA. 342+70 PROPOSED (4) LINK 16 WASHINGTON _ (2) CITY OF TUKWILA INNERDUCTS & (2) CITY OF TUKWILA r Z /}� O (SEE SHEETS DT009 TO DT0013) 2" CONDUITS BY s"tW ; m o DIRECTIONAL BORE 1 I Z m EXISTING TUKWILA FIBER ' � OPTIC VAULT 5'x2' �.�"---�-------mot s (25-TA) ♦i '343+00 24.5' 1 ♦ I I 2.5' \r`j t, 8.0' o 4 9.0' t CONC. CONCRETE SIDEWALK T---- T---- T COLUMN O I --W W— ---W --- —W -----W — —W -- T---- T---- € CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK 14 If R/W WIDTH y PERMITS o TRENCH DETAILS BORE C 0 TO SEATTLE, WA +r 3 n a O O 3 O a0 a a Z N CC=317' o N C' 3 4" HOT DIP GALVANIZED STEEL a o 342+00 z w o o' w Q 342+59 DO CO z aa' (1) H.D.G. STEEL W/ (4) 1-1/4" INNER. z0 (1) H.D.G. STEEL W/ (2) 1-1/4" INN. & moo.. a" a 6l �' � (1) 1-1/4" INN. C, BRIDGE ATTACHMENT PROPOSED RECEIVING PITn� CONCRETE CURB "& GUTTER C.4 W _W 1 w- T 12'x7' i --w __L==w =_ SOUTHCENTER �� HAZARD v) r W BLVD. \, COMMUNICA TION & a M I ASPHALT ��\ ELECTRIC LINES a \ C I I BORE DT001 "6" DT001 "6" BORE 0) PROPOSED 00 + FIBERGLASS 'MH + 4'x4'x4' STA. 342+70 5C 4" STEEL `- 2" SDR-11 HDPE 342+59 342+72 342+68 342+78 9' 6' (4) 4" STEEL (4) 2" HDPE (2) 4" STEEL (2) 2" HDPE TRENCH TRENCH FOR DIRECTIONAL BORE PROFILE SEE SHEET PP071 2" SDR-11 HDPE 342+78 344+50 172' (4) 2" HDPE (2) 2" HDPE DIRECTIONAL BORE R/W WIDTH PERMITS BORE TRENCH DETAILS TO TUKWILA, WA RECEIVED 'JUL 2 6 2012i LIE DATE: 1. IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE SUBSURFACE UOUTS' UNES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTVAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY F011 DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEXGEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILUNGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA, SEATTLE 02 WASNINGTON FIA M3206 ISSUED FOR MAIMENANCE SEPTEMBER 2GGS, BY POWER ENGINEERS. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTIICENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PROM SURVEYING INC. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 �IENA O N N UIT In o ..00 + Z SCALE: 1' = 20' SOUTHCENTER p BOULEVARD Q F- w TUKWILA, WA �V) PROPOSED CO D DRAWING �O DN071 r o„ � T a z E E m yaa Im CLLn co y L!1 O O rN N N W y ti m zo W O.. z IV LnN.wn rt ICE TRENCH TRENCH SEE BELOW FOR APPROPRIATE EXISTINGRADE 18" EXISTING SURFACE RESTORATION DETAILS G GRADE SEE BELOW FOR APPROPRIATE SURFACE /,' 6" WIDE EXTRA STRENGTH 15" MIN` :� RESTORATION DETAILS i\ NON —DETECTABLE 24" MAX.' 18" 18" MIN. \' ♦ ! MIN. i �/� EXISTING UTILITY (TYP.) 48' \i 48" MIN. �r \ MIN. , %�\< USE CDF BACKFILL UNDER CONCRETE AND ASPHALT 15" MIN. AREAS. ALL OTHER AREAS USE NATIVE BACKFILL OR ``' \ 24" MAX.:; N` CRUSHED ROCK WITH NATIVE BACKFILL MATERIAL 6" WIDE EXTRA STRENGTH COMPACTED TO 90% COMPACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH \� Nj NON —DETECTABLE %'.% \� CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS t\ WHERE APPLICABLE 18" MIN. EXISTING UTILITY (TYP.) TYPICAL TRENCH NEAR EXISTING UTILITIES - DETAIL "1" NOT TO SCALE EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION EXISTING SUBBASE UNDISTURBED EARTH IN AREAS WITH LESS THAN 4' CLEARANCE CDF OR NATIVE BACKFILL PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE (6) 2" SDR-11 HDPE INNERDUCTS (REFER TO DT002) UTILITY POLE OR PARALLELING GUARDRAILS INNERDUCTS 5' 5' MIN. MIN. TRENCH STEEL PIPE TYPICAL STEEL PIPE AT UTILITY POLES & GUARDRAILS - DETAIL "3" NOT TO SCALE CL TRENCH EXISTING GRADE EXISTING SUBBASE ASPHALT PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED ASPHALT PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE CDF BACKFILL PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE ASPHALT ROADWAY AND DRIVEWAY PATCH DETAIL "5" NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL TRENCH nGTA II "7" NUT TU bL ALL (6) 2" SDR-11 HDPE INNERDUCTS V 18" 8 — 4" CONCRETE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE MATCH EX. WIDTH 6 SUITABLE SUBBASE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITHCITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN' AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE CDF BACKFILL PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE CONCRETE SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT DETAIL "4" NOT TO SCALE GRAVEL OR LOAM AND SEED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE TRENCH APPLICABLE EXISTING GRADE MATERIAL NATIVE 'BACKFILL OR CRUSHED ROCK WITH NATIVE BACKFILL MATERIAL PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT GRAVEL AREA OR LOAM STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE REPLACEMENT - DETAIL "6" NOT TO SCALE JUL 26 20121 1.IULY 19, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROKIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEKGEN UNK 16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MIT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA SES3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-0E-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY MUM SURVEYING INC. A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 WENA AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA TYPICAL TRENCH AND RESTORATION DETAILS DT001 1. JULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE CONDUIT ARRANGMENT (6)2" SDR-11 HDPE CONDUITS (4)2" SDR-11 HDPE CONDUITS BACKFILL (REFER TO DT001) 1� ° � 4 G G ° s Q G � � G ° r j �Ixl CONDUIT SPACER' ASSEMBLIES SHALL BI FIRMLY SECURED IN PLACE 'USING NON-METALLIC TIES DURING CDF PLACEMENT ONLY CONDUIT ARRANGMENT DETAIL I'D" NOT TO SCALE CONDUIT ARRANGMENT DETAIL "B" NOT TO SCALE 2" SDR-11 E NNERDUCTS CDF BACKFILL PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE MAXIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN CONDUIT SPACER ASSEMBLIES IS 4'-0" CONDUIT SPACERS ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE FIRMLY SECURED IN PLACE USING NON-METALLIC TIES DURING CDF PLACEMENT ONLY BACKFILL (REFER TO DT001) (2)2" HDPE CO CONDUIT ARRANGMENT DETAIL "C" NOT TO SCALE � L7 4 ° a ° ° a G ' ° a a � a ° a n a ° CDF BACKFILL PLACED a IN ACCORDANCE WITH ° CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION a STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE -" -DR-11 ERDUCTS ft'11`013 RANGWNI (SCALE JUL 2 6 20121 1. SUBSURFACE UN UTY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEXGEN UNK 16 UGMGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA, SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA, SES3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMERER 20DS, BY POWERENGINEERS. 3. REFERTOPLANS TNLEDRIGHT-OF-WAYAND TOP OGRAPHICSURVEYSOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 RY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. E. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 SIENA SCALE: AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA TYPICAL CONDUIT ARRANGMENT DETAILS DT002 I. FULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE m 3 0 8 r = A Nn o r _ Ztaa a nnn m �aTno � C rN TM �a O N N z_.. N N LU Y m LU 2 c ZCn,- w o .... .N. w a LM A O dO IAtiiW PROTECTED AREA 12" MIN. STEEL OR WOOD POSTS ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO UPSTREAM SIDE OF POST WORK FLOW AREA 36" MAX. 4"x6" TRENCH W/ COMPACTED FILL GRADE STONE EXISTING CATCH BASIN SILT FENCE DETAIL 'A' NOT TO SCALE SURROUND CATCH BASIN GRATE WITH A 10" BERM OF 1 /2" TO 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL CATCH BASIN GRATE INTERIM CATCH BASIN GRATE PROTECTION DETAIL 'C' NOT TO SCALE rtt-zv -fit T IV.1-� 11 (!t I '' 111E I i n� II jl ... ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO WORK AREA SIDE OF POST 12" MIRA'FI 140—N FILTER FABRIC PROTECTED AREA FILTER SOCK DETAIL 'B' NOT TO SCALE CINCH SEALING TIE HEAVYWEIGHT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (DOUBLE STITCHED) FILL WITH GRAVEL, SAND OR PEASTONE AS REQUIRED STEEL OR WOOD POSTS WORK AREA GRADE SILT FENCE DETAIL D NOT TO SCALE 11 0 /11 . SILT FENCE(S) WILL BE !INSTALLED WITHIN THE AREA OF RESTORATION AS IT APPLIES TO THE PREVENTION OF SILTING ,O DURING CONSTRUCTION. UCTION. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD AT THE TIME OF TRENCH CONSTRUCTION. RECEIVED JUL 26 2012I NOTES: 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERECOMPLEDACCORDINGTO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROLMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBIUT)' FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEXGENUNK16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BI WNGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BES3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005. BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFERTOPIANS TIREORIGHT-OF-WAYAND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED OS/O8/12 BY FROM SURVEYING INC. 4. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 MEiNA SCALE: AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL DETAILS DT003 1.IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE Y n �° lu � T a vac. j mIrno g C N zln6 t o %0 N N LJ y ti z c Z. J j zo- wo... N z0,0 � 0 Ln.NHwa NOTES: 1. BALES SHALL BE PLACED IN A ROW WITH THE ENDS TIGHTLY ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES. 2. BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY STAKES OR RE —BARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALES .THE FIRST STAKE STEEL OR WOOD POSTS IN EACH BALE SHALL BE ANGLED TOWARD PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE TO FORCE BALES TOGETHER. 3. INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO 4. BALES SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WHEN THEY BECOME UPSTREAM SIDE OF POST FILLED WITH SEDIMENT AND BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR STRAW BALES DRAINAGE. 36" MAX. FLOW. AT' W01 GRADE CT«' ^0 "170L/ POSTS STAKED HAY BALES W/ SILT FENCE DETAIL'B' NOT TO SCALE FLOW PROTECTED I GRADE AREA AREA WORK j - 12" MIN. 4"x6" TRENCH W/ COMPACTED FILL STAKED HAY BALES W1 SILT FENCE DETAIL'A' NOT TO SCALE JUL 2 6 20121 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES,ASSHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SI ENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NFXGEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BES3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. <. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL • Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 IA AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA TYPICAL HAYBALE PLACEMENT DETAILS DT004 UE DATE: 1. JULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE 32"0. FRAME & COVER 10" CASTING 3/4" GASKET 5" WALL I - w BETWEEN FRAME & RISER TYPICAL DETAIL "A" NOT TO SCALE "CONSEAL" GASKET — 3/4" 1 /4" INTERIOR 5' WALL VAULT EXTERIOR t+ L A y d y, H o �aa aanDO y n 0 vI 10 N N w z 0 W 0 .. .. YV 0,0 Z 0 V2 .Ni w—n KEYWAY DETAIL TYPICAL DETAIL "B" NOT TO SCALE KNOCKOUT DIAPHRAGM TERM -A -DUCT CONDUIT ENTRANCE DETAIL (TYP.) NOT TO SCALE A :3I_\IJ\TAI:kT/TA NV I I V oUALt PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE o 0 I fV 4 3/4" DIA. KNOCKOUT O O 00 8 EACH SIDE + 4 SIDES V-3j" 1'-3j" END VIEW NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. MANHOLES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE 2. ALL MANHOLES SHALL COMPLY WITH AASHTO HS 20 LOAD RATINGS FOR PLACEMENT IN ROADWAYS. 3. THE MANHOLE SECTIONS MUST BE PROPERLY ALIGNED AND FREE OF DIRT AND STONES WHEN JOINED. IF THEY ARE NOT, REMOVE THE MISALIGNED SECTION, REMOVE THE GASKET AND CLEAN THE JOINT AREA, INSTALL A NEW GASKET, AND REJOIN THE MANHOLE SECTIONS. 4. SPLICE MANHOLES SHALL INCLUDE AC/DC FILTER PROTECTION.. 5. FOUR 1/2" DIA. BRONZE GROUNDING INSERTS, WELDED TO THE MANHOLE REINFORCING STEEL, SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE FOUR OUTSIDE BOTTOM CORNERS OF THE MANHOLE. 6. BASED ON PLANS TITLED 444—LA BY U.V. AUBURN (A DIVISION OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST INC.) AVAILABLE AT WWW.UVAUBURN.COM ISSUE DATE: JANUARY 2006. RISER No. 3606 (AS REQ'D) ROUND ACCESS No. 44-38C GALVANIZED "C" CHANNEL, 2'-0" LG.; 1 EACH SIDE 4 SIDES 6" PAD 'OF COARSE .AGGREGATE CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER SHALL BE PART NO. E-1380 AS MANUFACTURED BY D&L FOUNDRY & SUPPLY (707-557-4525). COVER SHALL BE HEAVY—DUTY WITH A BLIND LIFTING HOLE AND SECURITY BOLTED. SECTION AA NOT TO SCALE REFER TO APPROPRIATE SURFACE RESTORATION DETAIL SHEET DT001 CDF BACKFILL PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE EXISTING GRADE SEE DETAIL A SEE DETAIL B OPTIONAL GALVANIZED PULLING 'IRON 1 EACH CORNER (2) 2 1 /2" DIA. 01 GROUND ROD KNOCKOUTS e�` RECEIVED JUL 2 6 20121 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERECOMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBUC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TIT LED NEXGEN LINK 16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATFLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BE532M ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 200S, BY POWER ENGINEERS, 3. REFERTOPLANS TTTLEDRIGHT-OF-WAYAND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOUIEVARO, PLANS DATED DS/03/12 BY MUM SURVEYING INC. G. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 �j NA, AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA MANHOLE 4"-LA DETAILS DT005 I. IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE 101, CASTING i ra a � H o U - a E1=ff yna G CL Ln CO y L+± o aC 1 N zr00 b N N Z .6. 21. 1 zo wo .. .. a N 'O„ w VI .Ni w 'a 32" 0. FRAME & COVER 3/4" GASKET BETWEEN FRAME & RISER TYPICAL DETAIL "A" NOT TO SCALE 4 3/4" DIA. KNOCKOUT 8 EACH SIDE 4 SIDES A PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE i �— 43" END VIEW NOT TO SCALE PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE A 43" NOTES: 1. MANHOLES SHALL BE INSTALLED PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE. 2. ALL MANHOLES SHALL COMPLY WITH AASHTO HS 20 LOAD RATINGS FOR PLACEMENT IN ROADWAYS. 3. THE MANHOLE SECTIONS MUST BE PROPERLY ALIGNED AND FREE OF DIRT AND STONES WHEN JOINED. IF THEY ARE NOT, REMOVE THE MISALIGNED SECTION, REMOVE THE GASKET AND CLEAN THE JOINT AREA, INSTALL A NEW GASKET, AND REJOIN THE MANHOLE SECTIONS. 4. SPLICE MANHOLES SHALL INCLUDE AC/DC FILTER PROTECTION. 5. FOUR 1/2" DIA. BRONZE GROUNDING INSERTS, WELDED TO THE MANHOLE REINFORCING STEEL, SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE FOUR OUTSIDE BOTTOM CORNERS OF THE MANHOLE. 6. BASED ON PLANS TITLED 444—LA BY U.V. AUBURN (A DIVISION OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST INC.) AVAILABLE AT WWW.UVAUBURN.COM ISSUE DATE: JANUARY 2006. CDF BACKFILL PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE 6" PAD OF COARSE AGGREGATE CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER SHALL BE PART NO. E-1380 AS MANUFACTURED BY D&L FOUNDRY & SUPPLY (707-557-4525). COVER SHALL BE HEAVY—DUTY WITH A BLIND LIFTING HOLE AND SECURITY BOLTED. SECTION AA NOT TO SCALE REFER TO APPROPRIATE SURFACE RESTORATION DETAIL SHEET DT001 EXISTING GRADE SEE DETAIL A RECEIVED JUL 2620121 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERECOMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROMMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEKGEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BB3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-DF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. E. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 Nb IENA SCALE: AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA MANHOLE 444 FIBERGLASS DETAILS DT006 1. IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE U) 3 a0 v, c V � a F- o, z Emm: aa S 6 Ln 00 y N O C.H N �z Ln Ci C> z c Z zo-�-� Q N lA .N-I W O NOTES: 1. REFER TO CITY OF TUKWILA PLANS WD3 & SSP4 FOR WORK WITHIN GEOSYNTHETIC WALL AND REINFORCED 1:1 SLOPE AREAS. 2. ALL MANHOLES SHALL COMPLY WITH AASHTO HS 20 LOAD RATINGS FOR PLACEMENT IN ROADWAYS. 3. MANHOLES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND WSDOT STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE 4. MANHOLE SECTIONS SHALL BE PROPERLY ALIGNED AND FREE OF DIRT AND STONES WHEN JOINED. IF THEY ARE NOT, REMOVE THE MISALIGNED SECTION, REMOVE THE GASKET AND CLEAN THE JOINT AREA, INSTALL A NEW GASKET, AND REJOIN THE MANHOLE SECTIONS. 5. SEE SHEETS DT014, DT015 & DT016 FOR CONDUIT ARRANGEMENTS ENTERING MANHOLE. T_ V-104" 51" END VIEW NOT TO SCALE J" DIA. INSERT WITH HEX BOLT (2) EACH SIDE (2) SIDE. FULL LENGTH KNOCKOUT 2'-4" 1/2" DIA. LOCKING HEX BOLTS 5.2083' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ A 2.25' RECESSED J LIFT HANDLE PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE GALVANIZED DIAMOND PLATE COVERS W/ BOLT -DOWN LOCKING D1 U GALVANIZED "C" CHANNEL, 4'-0" LG.; 1 EACH SIDE 2 SIDES n I .D. e D .. .Q s 1 J" DIA. LIFT HOLE (1) EACH SIDE (2) SIDES 2" FULL LENGTH 10" WIDE KNOCKOUT IN FLOOR FOR 'INTERCEPTS " DIA. PULLING INSERT (1) EACH END (2) ENDS. SECTION AA NOT TO SCALE 1 1" 2'-6" 2'-71" 4" 2•0 ECEIVED JUL 2 6 20121 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES,ASSHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEXGEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BE53206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-0E-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUfHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/03/12 BY PRIM SURVEYING INC. A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL • Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 blENA SCALE: AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA MANHOLE 25-TA DETAILS DT007 1.IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE =. o T .zExx . v a Z a CLLn CO �vLno I N N W � 0pOD Z G .r T Z. zo- W N V z r" �D �'V1 Ni W 'n GROUND ROD AND WIRE INSTALLATIONS ROUTE GROUND WIRE INTO MANHOLE NEXT TO DUCT(S) OR THROUGH A HOLE DRILLED IN MANHOLE #6 AWG SOLID COPPER GROUND WIRE BONDED TO GROUND ROD WITH PANDUIT GCE250-1/0 CRIMP COMPRESSION CONNECTOR. DUCT(S) 5/8"x8' GROUND ROD PANDUIT PARTS LIST PANDUIT PART # DESCRIPTION GCE250-1/0 GROUND "E" STYLE CONNECTOR 5/8" GROUND ROD TO #6 SOLID (REQUIRED AT INSTALLATION OF MANHOLE/SPLICE BOX) GCE1/0-1/0 GROUND "E" STYLE CONNECTOR #6 SOLID WIRE TO #6 SOLID WIRE (USED WHEN CONNECTING SPLICE CASE OR FILTER/ARRESTOR TO PREINSTALLED GROUND WIRE) CD-920G-250 DIE FOR 250 CONNECTORS CD-920G-1/0 DIE FOR 1/0 CONNECTORS CT-2931 PORTABLE COMPRESSION TOOL #6 AWG SOLID COPPER INSULATED GROUND WIRE LEAVE SLACK COILED IN MANHOLE TO EXTEND 6' ABOVE LID GROUNDING FOR MANHOLES NOT TO SCALE GROUNDING FOR MANHOLES AND HANDHOLES: • THE GROUND ROD FOR A MANHOLE OR HANDHOLE SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO NON —DISTURBED DIRT AS NEAR TO THE STRUCTURE AS POSSIBLE. UNDISTURBED DIRT 1.05" —� 1.00" HAS GREATER CONDUCTIVITY THAN COMPACTED FILL DIRT. IF UNABLE TO INSTALL THE ROD INTO UNDISTURBED DIRT NEAR THE STRUCTURE, DRIVE THE ROD DEEPER BELOW THE STRUCTURE IF POSSIBLE. THE 2.66" TOP OF THE ROD SHALL BE AT LEAST AS DEEP AS THE SHOULDER OF THE MANHOLE OR AT LEAST SIX / INCHES BELOW THE TOP OF THE HANDHOLE. • THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE BONDED TO THE ROD GCE250-1/0 WITH THE PROPER PANDUIT CRIMP CONNECTOR AND CONNECTOR DETAIL ROUTED INTO THE MANHOLE/HANDHOLE EITHER NOT TO SCALE THROUGH ONE OF THE CABLE ENTRANCES OR A HOLE DRILLED INTO THE UPPER PART OF THE 'STRUCTURE. 0.94" THERE SHALL BE ENOUGH SLACK 'WIRE LEFT IN THE 0.66" STRUCTURE TO EASILY REACH SIX FEET ABOVE THE i MANHOLE LID OR SIX FEET ABOVE THE FINISH GRADE 1 72,T OVER THE HANDHOLE. THIS WILL EASE THE / INSTALLATION OF FUTURE .SPLICE CASES OR FILTER/ARRESTORS. COIL THE SLACK WIRE NEATLY AND GCE1/0-1/0 USE PLASTIC TIES TO SECURE IT OUT OF THE WAY. � CONNECTOR DETAIL RECEIVED 1aNOT TO SCALE r 0 JUL 2 6 2012 its 1 enmmuNbTv 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFERTOPLANSTITLED NIXGENUNK16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BI WNGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BES32M ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TIT LED RIGHT-0E-WAY AND TOPOGRA➢HIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 ,IENA AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA TYPICAL MANHOLE GROUNDING DETAILS DT008 a � m � T a yda d a In cD C N z En o6 UO ?GJ U wo.. w LA Nd W1 (2) 4" GALV. STEEL CONDUITS SWEEP AROUND HEADWALL BEHIND EXISTING TIME WARNER CABLE UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT SPACED EVERY 6' OC ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT (SEE DT010, DETAIL "B") (2) 4" GSP TO MH STA. 339+53 TIME WARNER EXISTING 4" GSP CONDUIT SWAY BRACE PLACED EVERY 18' OC (SEE DT012) EXISTING TIME WARNER CONDUIT 12" 1 y UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT 1 SPACED EVERY 6' OC ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT (SEE DT010) (SEE 'DT010) ABUTMENT BRACKET DETAIL TIME WARNER EXISTING 4" GSP CONDUIT (2) 4" GSP TO MH STA. 339+53 5- � 4' J- UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT SPACED EVERY 6' OC ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT (SEE DTO10, DETAIL "B") (2) 4" GALV. STEEL CONDUITS SWEEP AROUND HEADWALL 'BEHIND EXISTING TIME WARNER CABLE END COOPER B-LINE PIPE ROLLER BRIDGE HANGERS (LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED) EXPANSION JOINT (SEE DT013) PLACED BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND HANGER FIXED SEISMIC BRACE 2 REQUIRED (SEE DT011) (2) 4" GALV. STEEL —BA~--- CONDUITS, EACH WITH (3) 1-1/4" HDPE INNERDUCTS GREEN RIVER BRIDGE PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE EXPANSION JOINT (SEE DT013) PLACED BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND HANGER (2) 4" GALV. STEEL CONDUITS, EACH WITH (3) 1-1/4" HDPE INNERDUCTS 245' EXPANSION JOINT (SEE DT013) CENTER OF BRIDGE COOPER B-LINE PIPE ROLLER BRIDGE HANGER PLACED EVERY 6' OC (SEE DTO10, DETAIL "A") EXPANSION JOINT (SEE DT013) CENTER OF BRIDGE _ FIXED SEISMIC — BRACE 2 REQUIRED _ (SEE DT011) 100-YEAR COOPER B-LINE FLOOD LINE PIPE ROLLER EL=22.5 BRIDGE HANGER NORMAL PLACED EVERY 6' OC EL=5.0 SWAY BRACE (SEE DT010, DETAIL "'A".) PLACED EVERY 18' OC EXPANSION JOINT - (SEE DT012) (SEE DT013) PLACED BETWEEN GREEN RIVER BRIDGE 1ST AND 2ND HANGER ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE EXPANSION JOINT (SEE DT013) PLACED BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND HANGER UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT SPACED EVERY 6' OC ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT (SEE DT010, DETAIL "B") (2) 4" GSP TO MH STA. 342+70 (2) 4" GALV. STEEL CONDUITS SWEEP AROUND HEADWALL BEHIND EXISTING TIME WARNER CABLE COOPER B-LINE PIPE ROLLER BRIDGE HANGER PLACED EVERY 6' OC (SEE DT010, DETAIL "A") EXISTING TIME WARNER pp CONDUIT 6- COOPER B-LINE ADJUSTABLE DOUBLE ROLLER DECK HANGER PLACED EVERY 6' OC DETAIL (SEE DT010) UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT SPACED EVERY 6' OC ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT (SEE DT010, DETAIL "B") --S (2) 4" GSP TO MH STA. 342+70 (2) 4" GALV. STEEL CONDUITS SWEEP AROUND HEADWALL BEHIND EXISTING TIME WARNER CABLE END COOPER iB-LINE 'PIPE 'ROLLER BRIDGE HANGERS (LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED) RECEIVED JUL 26 20121 COMMUNITY 1.IULY 18, W12 PERMIT ISSUE 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERECOMPILEDACCORDINGTO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATION5 ARE APPROMMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFERTOPLANSTIITED NUGENUNKI6 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILUNGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON UP, BES32M ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 20DS, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFERTOPLANS TIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICFOMETRY INTERNATIONAL Cali before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 NIENA AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA TYPICAL BRIDGE ATTACHMENT DETAILS DT009 1. IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE NOTE: 1. HILTI KWIK BOLT TZ KB—TZ SS304 W" x 8 ll" WITH 4 X" EMBEDMENT SHALL BE USED AT STRUT MOUNTING LOCATIONS. 2. HILTI KWIK BOLT TZ KB—TZ SS304 5/8" x 6" WITH 4 X" EMBEDMENT SHALL BE USED AT CEILING MOUNTING LOCATIONS 3. ANY CHANGES TO THE MANUFACTURER OR SIZE OF ANCHORS MUST BE APPROVED BY SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP INC. MOUNT THREADED ROD TO UNDERSIDE OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK WITH KWIK BOLT TZ KB—TZ SS304 %" x 6" MEDIUM —DUTY ANCHOR ITEM NO. 202891 (SPACING PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS) %"x2 X" ROD COUPLING B—LINE PART. NO. 8655-5/8 %"-11 THREADED ROD 4" HOT DIP GALVANIZED RIGID SCH. 40 STEEL CONDUIT 4" HOT DIP GALVANIZED RIGID SCH. 40 STEEL CONDUIT V) 3 VCL c o T .Z.€ff yaa d c Ln Kn �yano ✓Y = .y N z Z LADG W Y 0 co «Z, c . Z J > Z O W O . . Z n 0 LnN.wa PIPE ROLLER BRIDGE HANGER IICTAII 'A' NV 1 IV JI.HLt 4—X' PLASTIC END CAP COOPER BLINE OR APPROVED EQUAL (TYPICAL) COOPER BLINE B202-1D %" NO TWIST SQUARE WASHER (TYPICAL) HILTI KWIK BOLT TZ KB—TZ SS304 %" x 8 1/2" ITEM NO. 202891 WITH 4 1 /2" EMBEDMENT B—LINE BFVSL — V STOP —LOCK KIT OR APPROVED EQUAL MIN EMBED. 4 � c A UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT ASSEMBLY DETAIL "B" NOT TO SCALE 1 %" X 1 %" GALVANIZED STEEL STRUT TYPE B—LINE B-22SHGALV120 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT B—LINE B2016 HOT DIP GALVANIZED PIPE CLAMP OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT (SEE DETAIL B-4) 4" HOT DIP GALVANIZED RIGID SCH. 40 STEEL CONDUIT B—LINE BFVSL — V STOP —LOCK KIT OR APPROVED EQUAL COOPER BLINE B202-1D %" NO TWIST SQUARE WASHER (TYPICAL) PLASTIC END CAP COOPER BLINE OR APPROVED EQUAL TOP AND BOTTOM (TYPICAL) NOTE: 2 WEEP HOLES REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED AT EACH END AT LOWPOINT OF ATTACHMENT / I \ "7 O'CLOCK" v O'CLOCK" 30't 30't INSTALL 7i�°0 INSTALL )2"0 WEEP HOLE WEEP HOLE SQUARE WASHER WITH DOUBLE NUT (TYPICAL ALL 'LOCATIONS) BRIDGE ATTACHMENT WEEP HOLE DETAIL "D" NOT TO SCALE STEEL CONDUIT TO BE SEALED ON EACH END WITH JACK MOON C—SE'RIES TRIPLEX DUCT PLUGS 'PRIOR TO CDF .AND BACKFILL PLACEMENT (3) 2" SDR-11 HDPE INNERDUCTS TRIPLEX DUCT PLUG AT ENDS OF STEEL CONDUIT DETAIL "C" NOT TO SCALE �� 0h i%� � RECEIVED JUL 2 6 20121 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERECOMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THEREFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROKIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST 8E DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEXGEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS 81 W NGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE OZ WASHINGTON FTA, OB32M ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005, BY POWERENGINEERS. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL i Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 _IE m an. a.wa u.me" LE: AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA GREEN RIVER BRIDGE TYPICAL BRIDGE BRACKET DETAILS DT010 ISSUE DATE: I. JULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE NOTES: OO 1. SUBSURFACE UFIUTY ONES, AS SHOWN HEREON, O WERE COMPILED ACCOPDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUTTEE AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL BRIDGE DECK OUNT THREADED ROD TO LOCATIONSMUSTDETERMINED SSUMETHE FIELD. SIENAIONS MUSTB GROUP ASSUMESNO UNDERSIDE OF CONCRETE BRIDGE RESULT 0 RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURREDAS A ATE RESULTOFILITYUTIUTIESOR OMITTED INCURRED SHOWN. DECK WITH KWIK BOLT TZ KB—TZREFER 2. UGKTG IPE TaLED TTOS EGHiGA T SYSTEMSBILLINGS,MTTOSFATTLE, SS304 5 8 x6 MEDIUM —DUTY WA, SEAlTlE 02 WASNINGTON FTq BES3206 ANCHOR ITEM NO. 202891 ISSUED FORMAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 2005,BY POWER ENGINEERS. 22 (TYPICAL) (SPACING PER MANUFACTURES 3. TO OGOPLANSTULEDRIGHT{ENTER AND SPECIFICATIONS) OPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTH[ENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. 4. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL SQUARE WASHER SQUARE WASHER WITH DOUBLE NUT WITH DOUBLE NUT (TYPICAL ALL (TYPICAL ALL OOPER BLINE B22 STRUT LOCATIONS) LOCATIONS) WITH (3) BLINE SC228 HANGER STRUT ROD STIFFENERS (OR APPROVED EQUAL) O SQUARE WASHER WITH DOUBLE NUT (TYPICAL ALL LOCATIONS) SEISMIC BRACE DETAIL "D" Call before you dig. k - ------------------ — — — - ------------------ tN NOT TO SCALE Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 2,� m IENA 0 SCALE: AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER ------... — - --- '-----'-- --------------...--- - -- - - - - BOULEVARD RECEIVED TUKWILA, WA J' L 2 6 2012l GREEN RIVER BRIDGE U iYPICALSEISMIC BRACE DETAILS COMMUNITf BEVELOPMENT DT011 Li DISTANCE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED ER BLINE B22 STRUT (3) BLINE SC228 HANGER T ROD STIFFENERS 4PPROVED EQUAL) B335-2-1 /2" BOLT SIZE - ADJUSTABLE HINGE (COOPER B-LINE) B22 (TYPICAL ACC -THREAD EW CONSTRUCTION 5/8" DIAMETER THREAD AL) 335-1 TYPICAL) IUARE WASHER TH DOUBLE NUT YPICAL ALL LOCATIONS) ARE WASHER i DOUBLE NUT 'ICAL ALL LOCATIONS) SQUARE WASHER WITH DOUBLE NUT PZ(TYPICAL ALL LOCATIONS) i ii j AMOUNT THREADED ROD TO UNDERSIDE OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK WITH KWIK BOLT TZ KB-TZ SS304 5/8"x6" MEDIUM -DUTY ANCHOR ITEM NO. 202891 (SPACING PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS) SWAY BRACE DETAIL °ELL NOT TO SCALE .off R 1,11 RECEIVED JUL 26 20121 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. JULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE SUBSURFACELEDAC ONES,AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILEDACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORDINFORMATION FROM HE REFERENCED AGE COMPANIES AND PUBLIC ESANDTHEIR AND T LOCATIONS MRET BE RMIONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST G DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING UPASSUMESNO ED RESPONSIBILITY UTYFOR OMITTED INCURRED AA RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. REFER TO PLANS TITLED NEKGEN UNK 36 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, MT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA, BES3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMERER 2005, BY POWER ENGINEERS. REFER TO PLANS TITLED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS DATED 05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYINGINC. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRV INTERNATIONAL Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 5IENA AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA GREEN RIVER BRIDGE TYPICAL SEISMIC BRACE DETAILS DT012 1. IULY IB, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE t! V) 3 C 3 Y L � a N O T z a a a Ln m �I z En(D 0++ 2 U70 I�- UD NN LU y m z c D = m zone EE2 I. ¢�! zr, W_ N A W a HANGER ASSEMBLY FIXED POINT DETAIL "F" NOT TO SCALE Cry NOV A 8 C s [INCH] I [INCH] [INCH] [INCH] i C3t. No, Mol�mcnt ;A Diwnctar .13 Lcragth C Height !XJG104-T81 4 6.37 12.80 r 6.75 " I.D. GALVANIZED CHEDULE 40 STEEL ONDUIT, WITH (3) 1—Y4" JNERDUCTS NOTE: THE EXPANSION/CONTRACTION COUPLING SHALL BE MARKED AT THE MIDPOINT TO ALLOW 2" OF MOVEMENT IN EITHER DIRECTION SO A CHECK CAN BE MADE AFTER FIXED SEISMIC BRACE INSTALLATION JUL 2 6 20121 QQMM.UNiTY pL7`SI_LOPMENT 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILEDACCOROINGTO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATIONFROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 2. REFER TO PLANS TIRED NEXGEN LINK 16 UGHTGUIDE SYSTEMS BILLINGS, NIT TO SEATTLE, WA., SEATTLE 02 WASHINGTON FTA BES3206 ISSUED FOR MAINTENANCE SEPTEMEBER 20DS, BY POWER ENGINEERS. 3. REFER TO PLANS TIRED RIGHT-OF-WAYAND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, PLANS BATED05/09/12 BY PRIZM SURVEYING INC. A. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL 1 • Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 5IEiNA u IW.Yr__ AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA GREEN RIVER BRIDGE TYPICAL EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL DT013 I.IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE M PROPOSED TUKWILA FIBER OPTIC VAULT 5'x2' (25-TA) (2) 1 1/4" HOPE CONDUITS (SEE DETAIL W) SEE DETAIL 'C' SEE DETAIL 'C' co 00 6" DETAIL 'A' DETAIL'S' .� O0 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 77 I 28 (4) 1 1 /4" HDPE CONDUITS FOR CONDUIT PROTECTION (SEE DETAIL 'A') SEE DETAIL 3 ON SHEET DT001 ________________� 2011 __-- E —__—_ E --- E ----- E ----- - E E In n _ (4) 2" HOPE CONDUITS EXISTING GUARD RAIL (SEE DETAIL 'A') MANHOLE ARRANGEMENT/4QQ0j V� AT PROPOSED MANHOLE STA. 339+53 NOT TO SCALE 3 c v, N °u �+ L 0 y N � T D va¢ a noa �nD••a � C NGO zw N �+ N 0 O+ W C r r Z 0 O^�� W 0.. .. Q N W W 1n.N.wa as DETAIL 'C' NOT TO SCALE 71 ,0 RECEIVED JUL 2620121 1. SUBSURFACE UOUTY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. 14.1 Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 SCALE: AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA MANHOLE ARRANGEMENTS DT014 1. JULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE (4) 1 1/4" HDPE CONDUITS (SEE DETAIL 'A') EXISTING TUKWILA FIBER OPTIC VAULT 5'x2' (25—TA) i SEE DETAIL 'C' PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MH 4'x4'x4' STA. 342+70 BORE PIT (4) 2" HDPE CONDUITS 12'x7' (SEE DETAIL 'A') SEE DETAIL 'C' i i ®o '® o oo®•_ 6" MIN. i I -/- 1 \ (2) 1 1/4" HDPE CONDUITS (SEE DETAIL 'B') EXISTING EXISTING TELEPHONE — TELEPHONE MH (2) 2" HDPE CONDUITS (SEE DETAIL 'B') := co im MANHOLE ARRANGEMENT DETAIL 'A' DETAIL 'B' DETAIL 'C' AT PROPOSED MANHOLE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE STA. 342+70 NOT TO SCALE 3 � � c N 8 t t 10 y d N � T «z yac �yoo 0 N N m t� =0 zanoo � N N Z r a� L7-1 �5 z9Bb 8-Ia illo RECEIVED JUL 2 6 20121 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, WERECOMPIIEDACCORDINGTO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THEREFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBIUTY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA MANHOLE ARRANGEMENTS DT015 g (4) 2„ SDf TO MANHOLE ST EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MANHOLE 4'x4'x4' STA. 339+53 NOT TO SCALE NORTH ELEVATION 50' SLACK " PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MH 4'x4'x4' STA. 339+53 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD Locus Map Not to Scale "— "1 HDPE STA. 342+70 WEST ELEVATION O 04�1 2 RECEIVED JUL 2 6 20121 1.IULY 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE SUBSURFACE UTILITY LINES, ASSHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT Oi UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 AS NOTED SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA BUTTERFLY DIAGRAM STA.339+53 DT016 3 a N �m 6 a" .. € .f a m ID o 05N a z 't Uf W Y m Z C 5D w o ar1j� Z n' NSW r '..�" REVISIONS:' - ' PROPOSED -. - - POSED 1JULY 18, ]011 PERMIT ISSUE Z FIBERGLASS MH NORTH ELEVATION 4'x4'z4' STA. 342+70'; 0 0 ,,.. ..,.; NOTES: ' 1. • SUBSURFACE UTIUTY LINES, AS SHOWN HEREON, _WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED ' - COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, ANDTHEIR -. LOCATIONS ARE APPRO% MATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SIENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO ' RESPONSIBIUTYFORDAMAGES INCURREDASA RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY - SHOWN. Locus Map Not to Scale (4) 2" SDR-11 HDPE 50' SLACK COIL (4) 2" SDR-11 HDPE TO MANHOLE STA: 339+53 TO MANHOLE STA. 348+89 i PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MANHOLE 1 4'x4'x4' STA.342+70 NOT TO SCALE SOUTH ELEVATION JUL L'� 2 6 2012! surrERFLYDIAGRAM STA.342+70 COMMUNWY DEVELOPMENT DT017 A a N 3 8 Y L � n a O T .Z. E ££ `LI C CL �yoo C N N �v zt00 zTnoo Ze w N N W m m z_ zo W N'D0 z 0 -,-I-I w a REVISIONS: 1.IULY 18, 2011 PERMIT ISSUE NOTES: 1. SUBSURFACE UTILITY UNES,ASSHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPILED ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THE REFERENCED COMPANIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST 8E DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. SI ENA ENGINEERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UTILITIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. \ \ EXISTING PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED FIBERGLASS MH Z FIBERGLASS MH 4'x4'x4' ZSTA339+53 STA. 4' . 1 1 STA. 342+70 m 0: CC=619' OF CC=844' CC=317' SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD 1 Call before you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 IE'J11A= un r�.ar gym.. a.wmu. o,.m SCALE: NOT TO SCALE n SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD RECEIVED TUKWILA, WA JUL 2 6 20121 CABLE PLACEMENT DIAGRAM COMMUNITY DT018 (V a 0 _o i' 7 J V PROJECT NO.: 8657594 CLLI CODE: STTLWAU9771 SPECIFICATION: at&t AT&T PROPRIETARY (Internal Use Only) Not for disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 2012 AT&T Intellectual Property, All Rights Reserved WESTERN TERRITORY LIGHTGUIDE PROJECTS NEXGEN LINK 16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEM SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TIE-IN CABLE & CONDUIT PLACEMENT PLANS CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON BID ISSUE REVISED: JULY 9, 2012 , 1 MBA i � ji 167 p.w•, I e,7 ,an r i •t+.R LOCUS MAP NOT TO SCALE AT&T PROPRIETARY This information constitutes confidential trade secrets and commercial or financial information owned by AT&T and is shared for Critical Infrastructure Protection purposes only. It is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), Exemptions (b)(3)&(4), and its disclosure is prohibited under the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905), the Critical Infrastructure Information Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. 133, and any State or local law requiring disclosure of information or records. This information must not be copied or distributed to others not agreed upon by AT&T, but in all events do not copy or distribute to such others without notification pursuant to Executive Order 12600. I--- S 11EN =1 _: R[111411114: ,. 50 Mall Road, Suite 203, Burlington, MA 01803 p 781.221.8400 f 781.221.7117 P' O� C f t A to c 0 z D: n 0 A CIO;! ?LnU,, t i Y N N Z a1 .-I yr Wd N f�V W p 0 C Z In In Z 8 7 7 W ^ W N Ili r, 0 lA W L IURE 3L 3013 PERMIT ME 3, MY S, 2012 RID ISSUE 3, AAY 9, M12 REVISED RID ISSUE I SUBSURFACE UnUnr UNES. AS SHOWN HEREON, WERE COMPREDACCOIhpNG TO AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM THEREFERENCED COMPAMES AND PUSUC AGENCI S, AND THEIR LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS MUST SEE OETERANNEO IN THE FIELD. SIENA EWAREERING GROUP ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBRITY FOR DAMAGES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF UUIRIES OMITTED OR INACCURATELY SHOWN. Call befom you dig. Washington Utilities Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 AT&T PROPRIETARY (Internal Use Only) Not for disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 2012 AT&T Intellectual Property, All Rights Reserved AT&T PROPRIETARY -This Information constitutes confidential trade secrets and commercial Or financial information owned by AT&T and is shared for C ftW Infrastructure Protection Purposes only. R is exempt from disclosure under the Freedorn of Information Act IS U.S.C. 5S2), Exemptions (bN3)&(4), and its disdosure is prohidted under the Trade Secrets Act (15 U.S.C. 1905), the Critical infrastructure Irdanmation ACt of 2004 6 U.S.C. 133, and any State or local law repukin6 disclosure of information Or records. This information must not be copied Or distributed to odwss; not agreed upon by AT&T, but in all events do not copy or distribute to such others without notification pursuart to Executive PREPARED FOR RECORD APPROVED FM OUTSIDE PLANT ENGINEER DATE eat& IENLP PROPRIETARY USE PURSUANT TO COMPANY INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFICATION PROTECT NUMBER OWNERSHIP: LINE CODE: CABLE CLU: SCALE: AS NOTED NEXGEN LINK 16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEM SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TIE-IN SHORELINE KEYMAP ft t A i cal c t 1 a ai cc � U~f Lin of o z a0 40 v N ff44 uboo io-'I� W 0uj .. .. uj n x tnQ a rW I SEE DT015 2) 4" GALV. STEEL FOR SHEEP AROUND MANHOLE HEADWALL UNDER AND AR BEHIND EXISTING DETAILS TYE WARNER CABLE R� DETAILS PROPOSED RECOVINC PIT 16'xa.5' I PROPOSED AT&T FIBERGLASS MH 4'><4'x4' STA 339+53 pROPOSEU IUKwILA FIBER OPTIC VAULT 0 5'x2' (25—TA) PROPOSED SILT R REFER TO EFER TO C e e OFMCW" O EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION KING COUNTY �° (SEE 07013) (SEE �JaNT WASC7RIC Qc BETWEEN WASHINGTON ,AZARD 4v � � CED BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND HANGER COMMUNICA71ON UNES � o� PROPOSED BRIDGE ATTACHMENT PROeOM BRIDGE ATTACHMENT (2) 4' NOT DIP GALVANIZED MOD V) 4' HOT DIP GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL. CONDUITS W/ (STEEL CONDUITS W/ ((2) CITYY OF TUKWTLA INNERDUCTS 2; (2; CITY OF INNERDUCTS (SEE SHEETS 07009 TO DTO13) Jr 71 (SEE SHEETS DTD09 TO D1013) 2. - w- - - IN o CONCRETE 0 BRIDGED o DECK mJ 1 W � a tar � wo UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT SPACED EVERY 6. OC TIME WARNER ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT YANG WALL EXISTING 4" GSP ' CONDUIT (SEE 07010. DETAIL 'B') (2) 4 GSP TO MH STA. 339+53 TIME WARNER EXISTING 4' GSP CONDUIT UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT — SPACED EVERY B' OC ALONG BRIDGE AEWTMEJRT (SEE 01010, DETAIL "B') / (2) 4' GALV. STEEL CONDUITS SWEEP AROUND HEADWALL BEHIND AND UNDER EXISTING TIME WARNER CABLE END COOPER B-LINE PIPE ROLLER BRIDGE HANGERS (LOCATION 70 FIELD VERIFIED) EXPANSION JOINT (SEE 07013) PLACED BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND HANGER 9"2 4' GALV. STEEL 1S. EACH WITH (3)C HOPE INIfERDUTS SWAY BRACE PLACED EVERY ' (SEE DTO12 P� A. !l. WAsy'PV' � r r^ � 14 OP EXPIRES Q�IA%%ZdIL EXPANSION JOINT SWAY BRACE EXISTING TUKWILA FIBER (SEE DT013) PLACED EVERY IV DID � OPTIC VAULT 5'x2- CENTER OF (SEE 07012) I (25-TA) ��- BRD1rE / � CONCRETE O IL I CONCRETE SIDEWAUC —W ----w — — —W ------ — CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SOLITHCENTER BLVD (2) GALV. STEEL (2) 4" GALV. STEEL IT CONDUITS SWEEP UNDER CONDUITS, EACH YATH AND AROUND (3) 1-1/4• HOPE CONCRETE HEADWALL BEHIND ENSiTNG CONCRETE INNERDUCTS BRIDGE TIME WARNER CABLE BRIDGE COLUMNS I COLUMNS FIXED SflSWC (BELOW) 4: CONCRETE BRIDGE (BELOW) BRACE < DECK IRED (�� CONCRETE BRIDGE g COOPER B-LINE PIPE ROLLER DECK BRIDGE HANGER PLACED EVERY S' GC (SEE DTmo. DETAIL 'A*) GREEN RIVER BRIDGE I PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE COOPER B-LINE PIPE ROLLER BRIDGE HANGER PLACED EVERY 6' OC (SEE DTD10, DETAIL •A') 245' EXPANSION JOINT 170 OF ) BRIDGE COOPER B-UNE PIPE ROLLER PLACED EVERY 6' OC (SEE DTO10, DETAIL "A') FIXED SEISMIC J BRACE — 2 REQUIRED (SEE DTOI1) 100-YEAR NORMAL WATER FLLINE ELm5.0 EL=2222.5 GREEN RIVER BRIDGE ELEVATION VIEW NOT TO SCALE Killi� ____1 EXPANSION JOINT PSEE OTOt3 LACED BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND HANGER 7 ISSUE DATE: INITIALS: i m,T 2ou D HVER OA RP46MS: INITIALS: If Ay a. 20u I K SEE D7015 NOTES: FOR ML AT&T MANHOLE FleERGLASS MH f wawtrACEunUvuNELAssnovrM"Wo". ARRANGEMENT 4'x4'x4' DETAILS STA. 342+70 WERECOWILMAccoara eat0 AVARAZU a[coRo arEOAAMTxfN rRaM n*rMEaENCED COWAMSANDPUDUCAOENM AMP TNarr PROPOSED SILT FENCE. UXCAMMAR[APPROX00tAMOMY ACTUAL louTnNSNusraEeflEa+wEownurmn REFER 70 DT004. EI[IaLNSIMMIANO ONDU►AS00AM RfrGMONEEVTCO "MAGROUP A SUMO 00 AsA POSED (4) LINK 18 & RESULT Of UM ES OMMED OR WXCURATELI SHOWN CITY OF TUKWILA 2' 2 XVIATOELAMSTmmNuwENLM16 DUITS BY DIRECTIONAL UGHTG IDESTSTEMSINUMM.MTTOSEATTLEE L(2) WA- aFATTLE OR WA:MMaTON rTA M32Oa nSUFD POR MNNEENANa urEEMHA aeon. n rowtR ENiwEERi. a. SAFER to Ajud TRIED aluor -WAY AND 10POORAPHKSURVE($0UENCI N IR a.D' I 110LIUVAADD'PLAMPATEOOSM�12aYPRUM L M ♦ Mi"MoTm"WoeruIEDENOM PKT0MVWpa[RMA7IONAL w--w-- PROPOSED RECEIVMG PIT 12'xr • o SOUTHCENTER \� O� at VD. d�Q Ca MIUNICAT7GN & 4Spy"<r � ELEWR7C UNES UNISTRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMtENT ill Call before you dig. SPACED EVERY 6' OC ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT Washington Utilities (SEE 01010, DETAIL W) Coordinating Council 1-800-424-5555 NOTE CONTOURS AND FEATURES UNDER BRIDGE DECK AT&T PROPRIETARY (internal Use Only) Not for disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 2012 AT&T Intellectual Property, All Rights Reserved EXISTING AT&T PROPRIETARY -This MtomMtbn n TIME WARNER Cmmercialoconfidential lInfor secrets owned UN157RUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT II6! CONDUIT commercial AT&Tinasshare Soriona SPACED EVERY 6' OC Lr to ATr and Is snared to.esoCritical ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT Infrastructure re Protection purposes only. o b . T2' exempt from disclosure under the Freedom (SEE 07010) or Information Act IS U.S.C. SS2), Exemptions(hX3MIe), and its disclosure Is prohtbRed under the Trade Secrets Act UNISiRUT BRIDGE ATTACHMENT 11a U.S.0 IML the Critical Infmstructum SPACED EVERY 6' OC Information Act of 2002, i q di c o3, and ALONG BRIDGE ABUTMENT YANG WALL anY State or local law reQuirlE� disclosure of (SEE BRIO DETAIL EN Information or records. This inromMtion (SEE OT010) must not be copied Or distributed to others not asmad upon by AT&T. but m all events ABUTMENT BRACKET do not copy or distribute to such others Without notification pursuant to Exacuti" r _ - _ ----4 DETAIL Order 12600. APPROVED FOR (2) 4' GSP OUTWE PLANT m w o TO MH STA 342+70 at&t 2) 4•G&V. STEEL ITS SWEEP AROUND &ENA HEADWALL UNDER AND BEHIND EXISTING TIME WARNER CABLE END COOPER B—UNE PIPE ROLLER BRIDGE HANGERS (LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED) is' CLEARANCE TO BE FIELD VE7InEU EXISTING TIME WARNER CONDUIT SPECIFICATION."- rNG966o5 PROJECT NUMBER: B657594 OWNERSHIP: LINE CODE: CABLE CLU: STTtWAU9771 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 6' NEXGEN LINK 16 LIGHTGUIDE SYSTEM COOPER 8 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TIE-IN � ADJUSTDOUBLE ROLLER DECK HANGER PLACED EVERY 6' OC DETAIL (SEE DTOfO) TYPICAL BRIDGE ATTACHMENT DETAILS DT009