HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2019-11-18 Item 6B - Motion - Mayor Sign 2 Letters of Support Regarding Federal Priorities Reducing Impacts Associated with Airport OperationsInitials
Meeling Dale
Prepared �)y
Mayor's review
qllnci rfm . en,
11/18/19
BJM
ITEM INFORMATION
LOW
IS'I'AI`FS11()NS()i�:
B. MILES
0RI(,INALA(',I,!NI)A DXI'F: 11/18/19
Authorizing the Mayor to sign two letters regarding federal priorities to reduce
impacts associated with airport operations.
C'\'I']�(;oRy N DiSCUS.4on
Af�g Dale 11118119
Motion
A,1/9 Dale 11118119
J�e.�olulion
Af�g I)ale
D Ordinance
A1119 Date
R Bid,,fivard
A 1�g 1XI/e
D Public I learing
M�g Dale
ED] 01hei
1)"le
SP()NSOI� DC-oulwil NMqyor 0HR [:]I) CD 01-1'inance 011ire EITS [:]Police DPIV/ EICourl
SP0NSOWS As part of the START process, the Port and the cities worked on developing a shared federal
SUNINIARY policy agenda regarding concerns with noise associated with airport and aircraft
operations. Specifically, the Port and the cities were looking to identify new tools,
resources, and flexibility to address noise issues. The Port of Seattle is asking adjacent
cities to sign onto two letters regarding federal priorities to reduce impacts associated with
airport operations.
Ri � \7 I I ;W,"i) tiy R C.O.W. mtg. E] CDN Comm ]�'inance Comm. PublIc Safety Comm.
FITrans &In fras truct Lire D Arts Corrim. Parks Cornn-i. Planning Cornrn.
DATI-�': N /A ('-(')MMT'I'I'EE CHATR: N/A
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SP0NSOi�/Ai)mIN. Mayor's Office
N/A
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
AmOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0 $0
Fund Source: N/A
Comments: NIA
MTG.DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
MTG.DATE
ATTACHMENTS
11/18/19
Draft Letter to Congressional Delegation
Draft Letter to Federal Aviation Administration
311
312
���1���� DaLe:XXXX
The Honorable Po���
Patty
United States Senate
The Honorable Adam Sm�h
United States House of Representatives
The Honorable Rick La�en
United States House of Representatives
The Honomb|eK4aha[antvveU
United States Senate
TheHonnrah|ePrami|aJayapa|
United States House of Representatives
Dear Senator Murray, Senator Cantwell, Representative Smith, Representative Smith and Representative
Larsen,
`
We are pleased to write to share our collectively developed near -term priorities for addressing
airplane noise and emissions through implementation of existing law and passage of relevant
legislation. We look forward to working with you and your staff toward swift and successful completion
of these provisions.
Seattle -Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) is the 8th busiest airport in the country in terms of
passenger volumes and one of the fastest growing — increasing from approximately 31 million travelers
served in 2010 to almost 50 million last year. The airport plays a vital role in the region's ongoing
economic vitality, but this growth is straining the capacity of our airport and our community. For this
reason, the Port and the six cities immediately surrounding the airport came together to focus on how
federal policies, regulations and programs can be changed to better align with local community
Specifically, have looked at two areas mffocus: 1\implementation ofprovisions ofthe 2O18
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization Act, and JU passage oflegislation that helps
address ongoing issues of concern:
FAA Reauthorization Provisions
While all ofthe Subtitle provisions are important, vvehave identified three top priorities —1)the
provisions related to evaluation of the 65 DNL noise standard (sections 173, 187 and 188), 2) the study
of the impact of overflight noise on human health (section 189), and 3) the proposed environmental
mitigation pilot program (section 190). The timely and effective execution of these provisions are well
aligned with community concerns, and have the potential for substantive benefit to our region. In
In terms of the 65 DNL, we know that the FAA has completed its comprehensive and detailed
survey ofnoise annoyance levels, and vveare similarly interested inyour responses tothe FAA
bill provisions related to alternative metrics and revised land use compatibility guidelines. The
combined findings of these study will provide essential information that will guide how our
313
community advocates for next steps related to noise mitigation best practices. We are urging
the release of all studies and associated policy guidance as soon as possible.
2. As one of the metropolitan areas called out in the legislation for focus, we are obviously
particularly interested in the scope, methodology and findings of the study of health and
economic impacts of overflight noise. We want to ensure that results of the study align as
closely as possible tothe Congressional intent behind this FAA bill provision. In addition to
urging swift action on this provision, we would like to be engaged with the FAA and the
research university carrying out this work throughout the process.
l Finally, our region is known for both its innovation and commitment to sustainability,and sovve
are very excited about the potential fora pilot program that would allow us to experiment with
new approaches to reducing or mitigatingi pacts on noise,air quality, orwater
quality. VVecertainly intend hzapply for this funding, ^ but also offer our willingness to provide
input tothe design and structure nfthe grant program. VVea|so|oUkfomvandtoworkingvvith
your offices toensure sufficient appropriations for this provision.
NewLegblotiom
There are also pieces of legislation that we believe would help move our priorities forward, and we look
forward toworking with you toward their passage:
1. Representative Smith's ProtectingAirport CoiUeofnznn Particle Emissions Act, which
would direct h FAA to report on ultrafineparticles and their health impacts for communities
around the 20 largest U.S. airports. The study would also analyze the potential impacts of
mitigation options, emissions reductions, and the increased use of aviation biofuels.
2. Representative Lynch'sAir Traffic Noise and Pollution Expert Consensus Act, which would direct
the FAA to enter into
~ appropriate ar/an�ementswith the National Academies of Sciences
,Engineering, and Medicine to provide for a report on the health impacts of air traffic noise and
pollution.
3. A new pieceoflegislation ihatvvou|daUowfo/secondarynoisembigatiooinvestments in
previously insulated homes, in specific situations where those noise reduction packages failed or
,
were flawed insome way.
'
4. VVealso fully
'- support additional federal investments and policies that expedite the creation and
implementation ofalternatives to commercial airplane trave|—kom Urban Ai/ Mobility
technology to high speed surface mass transportation options.
We have one additional request that is unrelated to the 2018 FAA Reauthorization or legislation, A large
group ofyour colleagues recently sent aletter' tothe U.S. Government Accountability Office (G4O)
asking for a study of how the FAA measures, mitigates and engages the public on aircraft noise related
toso'caUed"metnop|exes."VVebe|ievethatitvvou|dbeva|uab|etohavesimi|a/questionsmnawered
related to large "single site" airports as well, and so we would love to work with your offices to generate
acompanion request tothe GAO.
,
314
We will be in touch with your staff on next steps. In the meantime, do not hesitate to contact Eric
Schinfeld, Senior Manager of Federal Government Relations for the Port of Seattle, at 206.787.5031 or
with ideas ofhow wecan bemost helpful and impactfu|inour efforts. VVe
deeply appreciate your partnership in ensuring that aviation is as clean, quiet and environmentally
sustainable aspossible.
Commissioner Stephanie Bowman
President
Port ofSeattle Commission
Mayor Jimmy Matta
City ofBuhen
Mayor Jim Ferrell
City ofFederal Way
`
`
Mayor Jonathan Chi
City ofNormandy Park
C[:
'
Kevin Welsh, � Federal Aviation Administration
`-
Washington Congressiona| Delegation
'
-'
'
Mayor Erin 3i -edv
City ofSeaTac
/-'
Mayor Matt Pina
City ofDes Moines
�
Mayor Allan Ekberg
City of Tukwila
315
316
Oate:XXXX
Administrator Steve Dickson
Federal Aviation Administration
U.S.Department ofTransportation
808Independence Avenue, 5VV
Washington, D[20591
Dear Administrator Dickson,
We are pleased to write to share our priorities for implementation of the Subtitle D—Airport Noise
And Environmental Streamlining section of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization
Act of 2018. We look forward to working with you and your staff toward swift and successful completion
of these provisions.
Seattle -Tacoma International Airport (Sea —Tad is the 8th busiest airport in the
passenger volumes and one of the fastest growing - increasing from approximately 31 million travelers
served in 2010 to almost 50 million last year. The airport plays a vital role in the region's ongoing
economic vitality, but this growth is straining the capacity of our airport and our community. For this
reason, the Port of Seattle (which owns and operates Sea-Tac) and the six cities immediately
surrounding the airport came together to identify a shared agenda for federal policies, regulations and
programs that can be changed to better align with local community priorities.
In particular, we have looked at the 2018 FAA Reauthorization Act's noise provisions as a way to
substantively move forward on noise abatement and mitigation. As existing law with definitive deadlines
for action, these items provide the most near -term opportunities for progress. While all of the Subtitle
D noise provisions are important, we have identified three top priorities - 1) the provisions related to
evaluation of the 65 IDNIL noise standard (sections 173, 187 and 188), 2) the study of the impact of
overflight noise on human health (section 189), and 3) the proposed environmental mitigation pilot
program (section 190).
The timely and effective execution of these provisions are well ` aligned with community concerns, and
have the potential for substantive benefittoour region. More specifically:
1. |nterms ofthe 6SDN- vveknow that the FAA has completed its comprehensive and detailed
survey ofnoise annoyance levels, and we are similarly interested in your responses tu the FAA
bill provisions related to alternative metrics and revised land use compatibility guidelines. The
combined findings of these study will provide essential information that will guide how our
community advocates for next steps related to noise mitigation best practices. We are urging
the release of all studies and associated policy guidance as soon as possible.
Z As one of the metropolitan areas called out in the legislation for focus, we are obviously
particularly interested in the scope, methodology and findings of the study of health and
economic impacts of overflight noise. We want to ensure that results of the study align as
317
closely as possible tothe Congressional intent behind this FAA bill provision. In addition to
urging swift action onthis provision, vvewould like to be engaged with the FAA and the
research university carrying out this work throughout the process.
3. Finally, our region is known for both its innovation and commitment to sustainability, and so we
are very excited about the potential for a pilot program that would allow us to experiment with
new approaches to reducing or mitigating aviation impacts on noise, air quality, or water
quality. We certainly intend to apply for this funding, but also offer our willingness to provide
input tothe design and structure ofthe grant program.
There is one additional topic we would like to pursue further with your staff. We are very interested in
discussing further about whether there are instances in which certain residential buildings that have
received FAA and airport funded noise insulation packages might
' be eligible for secondary investment.
VVeappreciate restrictions onmultiple grants for the samepnjec1s,but believe that there might bevery
' �
specific situations in which the insulation has "failed" which would necessitate and justify additional
investment. We would love to set up a meeting to discuss this issue further, and get your thoughts.
VVewill beintouch with your staff nnnext steps. |nthe meantime, donot hesitate tocontact Eric
5chinfe|d,Senior Manager of Federal Government Relations for the Port nfSeattle, at2O6787.5O31or
.VVedeeply ' appreciateyour partnership inensuring that aviation isasclean,
quiet and environmentally sustainable as possible.
^
�
Sincerely,
,
Commissioner Stephanie Bowman
President `
Port ofSeattle Commission
Mayor Jimmy `
City mfBuhen ^�
Mayor Jim Ferrell
City of Federal Way
Mayor Jonathan ChicquetKe
City of Normandy Park
[Z:
Kevin Welsh, Federal Aviation Administration
Washington Congressional Delegation
Mayor Erin Sittedy
City ofSeaTac
Mayor Matt Pina
City ofDes Moines
Mayor Allan Ekberg
up