HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2011-11-21 Item 2D - Contract Supplement #9 - Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian-Bicycle Bridge with KPFF for $1,367,580.11City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Utilities Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
fl
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge
Project No. 90510403, Contract No. 07 -123
Supplement No. 9 with KPFF
ISSUE
Approve Supplement No. 9 with KPFF Consulting Engineers.
BACKGROUND
In late 2005, Tukwila received a $200,000 grant for design of the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC)
Pedestrian Bridge over the Green River from the Transportation Improvement Board's
Statewide Enhancement fund. KPFF was selected for the Type, Size, and Location (TS &L)
contract and has completed the TS &L Report. Staff has been successfully pursuing grant funds
to complete the design of this project. In October 2010, a new grant from the Statewide
Enhancement fund was awarded in the amount of $500,000. In August 2011, the City was
awarded a second grant in the amount of $750,833 from the State's Congestion Mitigation and
Air Quality (CMAQ) funding.
With the completion of the TS &L report, the Council gave direction to staff to pursue the design
of a twin -tied arch bridge with no accommodation for a future bridge crossing over West Valley
Highway.
DISCUSSION
Supplement No. 9 with KPFF includes the additional scope and fee to complete the design and
environmental permitting for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. Also included is the design of a
new pedestrian signal across West Valley Highway (in lieu of a future bridge crossing) and trail
design to connect users of the bridge to the permanent Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station. To
complete way- finding for users, connect the two transit hubs, and provide quality bicycle access;
the Supplemental Agreement also includes design of a "road diet" along Baker Boulevard to
replace excess vehicular capacity with new bike lanes and on- street parking.
Fiscal Impact: A new CIP page adds the additional design costs while reducing the construction
budget. Park Impact fees are being collected for this pedestrian bridge and the expected fees
will now cover part of the City match for design, rather than just construction.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Supplement No. 9 to Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF in the amount of $1,367,580.11
and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent
December 5, 2011 Regular meetings.
Attachment: Supplemental Agreement No. 9
W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \05 -RW03 TUC Ped Bridge \INFO MEMO Supp #9 KPF 11- 18- 11.docx 11
AlMl►
il�■�11On $ate
Supplemental Agreement
Agreement
Number 9
Original Agreement Number
07 -123 (h)
Project Number
05 -RW03
Project Title
Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE
Organization and Address
KPFF Consulting Engineers
1601 Fifth Ave, Suite 1600
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone:
Execution Date Completion Date
12/31/2013
New Maximum Amount Payable
1,612,436.93
Description of Work
Time and cost adjustment to incorporate efforts for the Plans, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate
Phase.
The Local Agency of the City of Tukwila
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with KPFF Consulting Engineers
and executed on and identified as Agreement No. 07 -123
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
A comp] PIP. scope of work has been inchided as Rxhihit A -1
11
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read: Revised completion date is December 31,2
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
nayahlP is TZ1 Al'? AIA QI
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By:
Consultant Signature
DOT Form 140 -063 EF
Revised 9/2005
By: Ci ty of Tukwila
Approving Authority Signature
Date
12
Exhibit A -1
Supplement No. 9 Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge
Plan, Specification and Cost Estimate (PSE)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Green River stands as a barrier between the City's urban center and the
transportation hub of the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project is a
preliminary step in defining the pedestrian corridor connecting these commuter hubs.
This project shall determine the type of structure and its location for crossing the
Green River. The bridge is to be a signature piece of the corridor and along with the
associated trail provide a direct, safe and enjoyable walking experience.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The overall objective of this project is to develop a connection from the intersection of
Baker Boulevard and Christensen Road to the Sound Transit property line of the
Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project will take place in three phases,
which include the following:
Type, Size and Location (TSL) Phase
Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate (PSE) Phase
Construction Management Phase
This scope of work shall be for the completion of the TSL Phase and the advancement
of the project through final construction documents for the PSE Phase.
During and /or at the conclusion of the PSE Phase, the City of Tukwila can exercise
the option to supplement KPFF's contract to include the Construction Management
Phase.
The project team is made up of the following firms:
Owner
Prime Consultant
Structural Engineering
Civil Engineering
Urban Design
Landscape
Illumination
Surveying
Bridge Architecture
Environmental and Permitting Services
Geotechnical Engineering
City of Tukwila
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPG Inc.
KPG Inc.
KPG Inc.
KPG Inc.
LMN Architects
Landau Associates
Landau Associates
13
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 2
SCOPE OF WORK
The following is a scope of work for the completion of the TSL phase and the
completion of the plans, specifications and estimated construction costs (PSE) phase
of the project. In addition to the basic scope of services, the Consultant has included
additional services that can be performed at the City's request.
Task No. 1.0 Project Management and Administration
Task No. 1.01 Project Schedule
A project design schedule shall be created in Microsoft Project that spans from
the notice -to- proceed for the supplemental work to the completion of the PSE
documents. The schedule shall be updated on an as needed basis.
Task No. 1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements
KPFF shall prepare supplemental contracts for KPG, Inc., Landau Associates,
and LMN Architects.
Task No. 1.03 Progress Reports
A progress report form shall be provided to each team member. This form
shall be filled out on a monthly basis and submitted with the invoice for the
work described in the progress report. KPFF shall then compile the reports
into a single document to be submitted to the City with the associated monthly
invoice.
Task No. 1.04 Invoices
Team members are to prepare monthly invoices for work completed. KPFF
shall compile the invoices into a single document to be submitted to the City.
Task No. 1.05 Team Meetings
The consultant team shall meet with the City on a monthly basis to discuss
project issues, schedule, progress, and general coordination of effort. The
consultant team shall meet internally on a monthly basis to coordinate project
tasks and design.
14
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 3
Deliverables
Project schedule with monthly updates
Monthly progress reports and invoices
Team meetings
o Participation in project meetings with the City (assume 12 meetings)
o Participation in internal consultant team meetings with the City
(assume 12 meetings)
Task 2.0 Design Criteria Document
KPFF shall finalize the design criteria based on coordination with the City:
Minimum bridge /trail widths.
Horizontal geometry constraints (including minimum radii for curves)
and allowable design speeds for bicycles.
Maximum allowable vertical grades and rates of curvature for both
bridge structures and for access ramps.
Emergency access requirements.
Minimum lighting requirements.
Green River hydraulic opening requirements.
Requirements for stormwater detention and water quality.
Construction criteria within 100 -year flood plain.
Utility clearance requirements.
Structural loading conditions.
Allowable structural deflections and vibrations.
Physical/ aesthetic impacts on adjacent uses,
Coordination with potential future vehicular bridge in similar area.
Deliverables
Draft Design Criteria Document
Final Design Criteria Document
15
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 4
Task 3.0 Topographic and Boundary Survey
KPG shall perform topographic surveying within the entire selected alternative
bridge and trail alignment, which is defined as Christensen Road (west boundary)
across the Green River to West Valley Highway (east boundary). Necessary
horizontal and vertical control shall be established for the boundary and
topographic survey of the site. The survey for the defined project corridor shall
include the bridge and approach areas. Trail connections are from Christensen
Road on the west side and from West Valley Highway on the east side to the bridge
approaches.
Task 3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase 1
KPG shall provide surveying under two separate phases. Phase One is from
the Green River Trail on the west side of the river eastward to West Valley
Highway. This phase allows the location of the bridge, ramps and connection
to West Valley Highway, including the crossing of West Valley Highway for
design and installation of a pedestrian signal (both sides of highway). Phase
One also includes mapping the right of way of Baker Boulevard from
Christensen Boulevard to Andover Park West, including the Andover Park East
intersection, and shall locate curb, sidewalk, driveways, striping, illumination
and utility castings.
Task 3.02 Topographic Mapping Phase 2
Phase 2 shall include the Riverview Plaza parking lot contained within parcels
2523049077 and 2523049039, the SPU pipeline parcel 2523049048, and
north of that parcel to the face of the Riverview Plaza office buildings. The
intersection of Christensen Road and Baker Boulevard will also be included in
this phase. The total acreage of this area is approximately 7 acres.
All field topographic surveying shall be performed to achieve 1 -foot contour
interval accuracy, and shall include location of existing 4 inches plus caliper
trees (excluding Cottonwoods which shall be 12 inch plus caliper within 100
feet of the river), streets, curb and gutter, limits of paving, fences, above- and
below ground utilities, drainage features, existing shrub and lawn areas, and
existing improvements within the defined project corridor.
A separate cost for private utility locating services has been included which
assumes 24 hours of underground utility sensing and locating.
The field survey includes surveying the banks of the Green River from 50 feet
upstream to 50 feet downstream. The river survey shall include top of bank on
both sides of the river and cross sections from top of bank to top of water at
25 -foot intervals. Indicate limits of 100 -year flood plain, ordinary high
waterline (OHWL) flagged in advance on the bank by Landau Associates.
16
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 5
The survey crew shall use City provided Horizontal and Vertical control in the
project vicinity and all surveying and mapping shall be based on City
Horizontal and Vertical Datum.
A base map at a scale to be selected by the project engineer shall be developed
detailing the items located in the above described field survey. The map shall
include positions of record and surveyed boundaries, as well as deeded and
platted right -of -way margins for the project area.
It is proposed to use KPG's existing layer standards and point codes for the
survey. Once drafted, field verified, and certified, KPG shall provide the project
engineer with two Xerox Bond copies of the topographic survey and one digital
copy of project survey files (AutoCAD, point files, field notes). Any as -built
information gathered during our research shall also be copied and submitted
to the engineer with the topographic mapping package. The deliverable
submittal package shall include detailed descriptions of point code and
layering schema.
KPG has included time and expense for project meetings, management of
surveying and drafting efforts, professional review and quality control in our
proposal.
Deliverables
Survey Project Base Map (two hardcopies, one electronic copy)
Task 4.0 Geotechnical Research and Recommendations
This task includes the completion of all field exploration and laboratory testing
needed to finalize the geotechnical recommendations for the project. Geotechnical
recommendations will be provided for stormwater infiltration, pavement design,
and foundation design for the bridge and approach ramps/ embankments.
Task No. 4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing
Landau Associates propose to advance a boring in the driveway to the house
located at 16113 West Valley Highway (King County Parcel number
000580033) to characterize subsurface conditions near the proposed east
bridge abutment. This boring will be advanced to a depth of about 120 ft
below the existing ground surface (BGS). Landau Associates plan to advance
three additional borings along the proposed trail alignment to characterize
subsurface conditions for stormwater infiltration rate evaluation and pavement
design. These borings will be advanced to a depth of about 17 ft BGS. The
borings will be completed using a truck- mounted drill rig using either mud
rotary (bridge boring) or hollow -stem auger (trail borings) drilling techniques.
Landau Associates have assumed that the City will obtain right -of -entry in
order to drill the borings and that no fee will be necessary to drill the boring.
17
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 6
The drilling will be accomplished by Holocene Drilling of Puyallup, Washington
under subcontract to Landau Associates. A geologist or geotechnical engineer
from Landau Associates will supervise the explorations, obtain soil samples
from the borings, and prepare field logs of conditions encountered in the
explorations. Soil samples will be obtained from the borings on about a 2'/2- or
5 -ft depth interval using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure, and
returned to our laboratory for further classification. Soil samples obtained
from the exploration will be held in our laboratory for 30 days after submittal
of the final report. After that date, the soil samples will be disposed of, unless
arrangements are made to retain them.
Landau Associates plan to install a standpipe piezometer in two of the three
borings advanced along the trail alignment. The standpipe piezometers will be
constructed in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-
160 and will be protected at the ground surface with a flush mounted
monument. Landau Associates propose to monitor the groundwater level in
the piezometers twice during the rainy season (typically November to May).
Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the boreholes not completed with a
standpipe piezometer will be abandoned in accordance with WAC 173 -160 and
capped with a minimum 1 -ft thick plug of quick- setting concrete.
Abandonment of the standpipe piezometers is not included with this proposal
and should be made part of the contract documents. Drill cuttings will be
placed in steel drums and transported to WM Dickson's facility in Tacoma,
Washington for disposal. Prior to drilling, a representative of Landau
Associates will mark the boring location in the field and arrange for an
underground utility locate (1- 800... call before you dig). Landau Associates
will also arrange for a private utility locate at each of the boring locations.
Three U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Falling Head Percolation
tests will be completed adjacent to the three trail borings described above to
determine the measured infiltration rate for porous pavement or biofiltration
swale. The EPA Falling Head Percolation tests will be completed approximately
1 ft BGS. The hollow -stem auger drill rig will be used to core through the
pavement section at the EPA Falling Head Percolation test locations. Upon
completion of the in situ infiltration test, the PVC pipe will be removed and the
hole will be backfilled with quick- setting concrete.
Landau Associates will conduct geotechnical and analytical laboratory testing
on representative soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings to aid in
their classification and determination of engineering properties. Laboratory
testing completed in our laboratory is expected to consist of 8 natural moisture
content determinations, 6 fines content determinations, 10 index tests (either
mechanical sieve analysis or Atterberg limit determinations), and 6 combined
analyses (mechanical sieve and hydrometer). A total of six soil samples will be
submitted to Analytical Resources, Inc. (ARI) of Tukwila, Washington for
determination of the organic content and the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC).
The organic content testing will be completed in accordance with ASTM D 2974
and the CEC testing will be completed in accordance with EPA laboratory
Method 9081.
18
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 7
In developing this proposal, it was assumed that work would commence during
daylight hours between Monday and Friday and that traffic control would
consist of traffic cones.
Task No. 4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation, Reporting, and Meetings
Based on the results of our previous explorations for the TSL design phase and
the field investigation and laboratory testing program completed for this task,
Landau Associates will complete geotechnical engineering analyses to develop
recommendations to support the design of the bridge, including:
Recommendations for earthwork and site preparation including:
clearing, stripping, and grubbing; the suitability of onsite soils for reuse
in structural fill; import structural fill requirements, subgrade
preparation; and placement and compaction of structural fill.
Pavement subgrade preparation.
Porous asphalt and porous concrete pavement sections (asphalt or
Portland cement concrete and base course thickness) required for
structural support of the proposed traffic.
Conventional asphalt and Portland cement concrete pavement design.
Design infiltration rate for porous pavement. The infiltration rate will be
determined in accordance with the Simplified Method outlined in
Section 5.4.1 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Seismic design criteria, including an evaluation of liquefaction and
lateral spreading potential.
An evaluation of the stability of the riverbanks and recommended
stabilization measures.
Recommendations for approach embankment structural earth wall
including: embedment depth, foundation subgrade preparation, design
parameters, nominal bearing pressure, anticipated foundation
settlement, and wall backfill and drainage considerations.
Estimated settlement of the approach embankments.
Recommended foundation type (driven piles /drilled shafts);
recommended tip elevations; expected range of nominal axial capacity;
uplift capacity; downdrag loads; estimated settlements of bridge
foundations; additional lateral loads caused by lateral spreading; soil
parameters for input into L -Pile (or equivalent) lateral pile capacity
software.
Construction considerations for the recommended foundation type.
Discussion of the impacts of constructing the bridge abutment and
approach embankment on the existing dike located at the west side of
the bridge and any recommended mitigation measures.
19
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 8
Deliverables:
The results of our field explorations and geotechnical engineering analyses will
be summarized in a geotechnical report. The report will include a site plan
showing the exploration locations, summary logs of conditions observed in the
boring, results of the geotechnical and analytical laboratory testing, results of
the in situ infiltration tests, and a discussion of subsurface soil and
groundwater conditions at the explorations. Two copies of the report will be
submitted as a draft for review by the project team. Upon receipt of comments,
Landau Associates will prepare and submit four copies of a final geotechnical
report. An electronic PDF copy of both the draft and final geotechnical report
will be provided to the design team.
Landau Associates have also budgeted to attend one meeting in the Tukwila
area with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) and the local Dike District
to discuss the impacts of the proposed project on the existing dike, and a
project kick -off meeting at KPFF's Seattle office.
Task 5.O Hydraulics
The Corps of Engineers (COE) has recertified the Green River Levee. The
recertification is only for the west bank, so the 100 -year flood plain on the east
side will be estimated at an elevation consistent with that determined by the COE.
The following is proposed for the hydraulic evaluation:
Task No. 5.01 Meet with Agencies
Meet with the Corps of Engineers and King County River and Floodplain
Management to obtain the best understanding of the ongoing studies and work
along Green River.
Task No. 5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplain
Based on existing COE data of the Green River, establish the current elevation
of the 100 -year floodplain within the banks of the Green River.
No work is currently scoped to identify 100 -year flood boundaries within
properties beyond the west bank of the Green River or east of West Valley
Highway.
Task No. 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance
Confirm vertical clearance defined within preliminary documentation with King
County River and Floodplain Management and document negotiated vertical
clearance requirements for the bridge.
20
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 9
Deliverables
Draft Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic
copy)
Final Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic
copy)
Task 6.0 Environmental and Permitting Services
This task covers consulting services to coordinate with regulatory agencies and to
provide required permit applications and associated environmental documentation
to obtain agency approvals for the proposed project.
Task No. 6.01 Team, Agency, and Pre Application Meetings
Landau Associates will assist in scheduling and participating in pre
application meetings with the City, Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW), USACE, and Washington Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) to coordinate permit conditions and easement requirements for the
project. Time is included to respond to agency comments on application
materials prepared in Tasks 6.02 through 6. 10, as presented below.
This task includes participation in at least two scoping meetings with WSDOT
Local Programs /FHWA and /or other potential state /federal funding agencies
to coordinate environmental documentation requirements associated with
project funding.
This task includes participation in up to six design team meetings and two
project workshops as identified in Task 1.05.
Assumptions
Five agency meetings at the project site are included in this subtask.
The six design team meetings and two project workshops will be held at
KPFF's offices in Seattle.
All time budgeted for meetings and workshops include travel time and
the deliverables mentioned in this task.
No additional studies will be required as part of the response to agency
comments.
Deliverables
Meeting summaries will be provided in e -mail correspondence.
Response to agency comments will be provided in e -mail correspondence
and within the associated documentation.
21
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 10
Task No. 6.02 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist
Landau Associates will prepare the SEPA Checklist for the project in
conformance with WAC 197 -11 -960 and City standards. The SEPA Checklist
(Checklist) will briefly describe the project and address the project's effects on
elements of the environment, as outlined in the Checklist. The Checklist will
include a list of permit requirements for the proposed project. To prepare the
Checklist, Landau Associates will use project design information and other
available studies prepared for the project, such as the documentation prepared
for the additional tasks /subtasks included in this proposal.
As necessary to complete the SEPA Checklist, Landau Associates will review
additional City documents such as the comprehensive plan, zoning code, and
other development regulations.
Assumptions
Additional studies for impacts associated with traffic, air, noise, or
housing are not included in this subtask.
Figures to be included with the checklist will be limited to those
prepared under other tasks in this scope of work.
The project will not require preparation of a SEPA Environmental Impact
Statement. Either a Determination of Non Significance (DNS) or a
mitigated DNS will be issued for the project.
City of Tukwila staff will prepare and publish the DNS (or mitigated
DNS).
Landau Associates staff will not attend a public hearing should one be
necessary.
Information to prepare the SEPA Checklist will be gathered from
interviews with agency /utility provider representatives and from readily
available public documents; no additional field work or other primary
investigations will be required.
Landau Associates will provide a draft copy of the SEPA Checklist to the
City and KPFF for review. KPFF will provide one set of consolidated
comments to Landau Associates, and Landau Associates will prepare a
final SEPA Checklist for publication by the City based on those
comments. Should additional rounds of review and comment be
requested by KPFF and /or City, a scope and budget amendment will be
required.
This proposal does not include time for Landau Associates to respond to
any public or resource agency comments on the SEPA Checklist after
the Checklist has been published for public comment.
22
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 11
Deliverables
An electronic (MS Word) copy of the draft SEPA checklist.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and one paper copy of the final SEPA
Checklist.
Task No. 6.03 WSDOT Local Programs Environmental Classification
Summary/ Documented Categorical Exclusion
Landau Associates will prepare a WSDOT Local Agency Environmental
Classification Summary (ECS) with supporting documentation as required for
projects that receive federal funding through WSDOT (Environmental
Procedures Manual, Section 310.07). The ECS will include the recommended
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) determination (assumed to be a
Class II, Documented Categorical Exclusion). Landau Associates will
document this assumption according to the WSDOT Local Agency Guidance
(LAG) manual.
Task 6.01 includes participation in scoping meetings with WSDOT Local
Programs /FHWA regarding documentation requirements associated with
federal funding. At a minimum, this scope of services assumes that the ECS
will include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (see Task 6.04), effect
determination for species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) evaluation (see Task 6.05), a determination of
project impacts on cultural resources (see Task 6.06), and documentation of a
wetland/ waterway delineation and mitigation sequencing (see Task 6.08 and
6.09). The ECS will also require a discussion of stormwater treatment and
detention, which will be based on design and information provided by KPFF.
Assumptions
The proposed project will receive funding from FHWA administered
through WSDOT Highways and Local Programs. The budget outlined for
this task may be used for completion of similar NEPA categorical
exclusion documentation required if funding is provided by other federal
agency.
The proposed project will be determined to be a Class II Documented
Categorical Conclusion (DCE) and neither a NEPA Environmental
Impact Statement nor an Environmental Assessment will be required.
Air Quality, Noise, Section 4(fl /6(f), Floodplain, and Environmental
Justice analyses will be documented in the ECS. Individual discipline
reports and modeling efforts will not be required for these elements of
the environment.
Wetlands/ waterways impacts will be avoided.
23
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 12
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft ECS.
An electronic (Adobe PDF and FileMaker Pro) copy of the final ECS.
Task No. 6.04 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Landau Associates will conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) for the residence located on a portion of King County Parcel number
0005800033 "residential property and a Screening -Level Environmental
Assessment for the approximately 600 -foot trail alignment that extends east
through the parking lot of Riverview Plaza from Baker Boulevard to the Green
River "easement property;" to include up to four parcels). Additionally, a
limited Phase II task will be performed for the residential property, consisting
of a pre demolition Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead -Based Paint
(LBP) Survey of the existing building on the residential property. These efforts
will document the history of use and current conditions of the residential
property and the easement property, and will identify and evaluate
environmental conditions that may represent liabilities to the City.
Landau Associates will conduct the Phase I ESA and Screening -Level
Environmental Assessment in general accordance with the ASTM International
(ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment Process, E 1527 -05 (as currently applied in
the State of Washington), and with the scope of work as modified for this
project. The ASTM standard, while subject to changes (as are all ASTM
standards), is recognized as generally meeting the due diligence provisions of
the federal statute [Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) 42 USC 9601(35) (B)] and the Washington State
Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) (RCW 70.105D.040) at the time this proposal
was prepared. ASTM E 1527 -05 was published in November 2005 to satisfy
the elements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) All
Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) rule. This rule establishes requirements that
purchasers must meet to limit their environmental liability under CERCLA and
qualify for protections, including the "Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser" and
"Contiguous Property Owner" defenses that were added by the amendments to
CERCLA passed by Congress in 2002.
The goal of the assessment process outlined in ASTM E 1527 -05 is to identify
recognized environmental conditions, which are defined as the presence or likely
presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products under conditions
that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a
release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into the ground,
groundwater, or surface water of the residential property and the easement
property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products
even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to
include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human
health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an
24
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 13
enforcement action if brought to the attention of the appropriate governmental
agencies.
Elements not included in ASTM E 1527 -05 (e.g., identification, sampling, and
analysis of asbestos, radon, lead paint, and lead in drinking water and /or
wetlands; regulatory compliance; cultural and historic resources; indoor air
quality and vapor intrusion, including the potential presence of mold or other
biological contaminants; industrial hygiene; health and safety; ecological
resources; and endangered species) are not included in this task, except for the
Asbestos and Lead -Based Paint Survey discussed below, which will be
performed for the existing building on the residential property.
It is important to understand that Phase I ESAs are not a means of finding
"everything there is to know about a property." Rather, they are attempts to
determine the environmental liabilities of a property or properties based on
reasonably available documentation (both oral and written) within the budget
and schedule limitations. This approach will be applied to this task for the
Phase I ESA for the residential property, which will include:
Reviewing available aerial photographs, historical fire insurance maps,
topographic maps, city or county maps and street directories, and local
historical information to assess past uses of residential property and
adjacent properties from the present back to their first developed use, or
back to 1940, whichever is earlier.
Reviewing listings from a subcontracted database service
(Environmental Data Resources, Inc.) of confirmed and suspected
contaminated sites abstracted from EPA, tribal, and Ecology
environmental databases, as prescribed by ASTM. ASTM requires that
these databases be searched for confirmed and suspected contaminated
sites within various distances up to a 1 -mile radius of the residential
property.
Contacting the local health and fire departments for information they
may have on environmental conditions at and immediately adjacent to
the residential property.
Conducting a site reconnaissance of the residential property to visually
and physically observe current land use activities and environmental
conditions. Conditions at the residential property will be documented
with notes and photographs. We will assess current uses at adjoining
properties from the residential property and public rights -of -way to the
extent that they are visually and /or physically observable.
Preparing a draft written report presenting the results of the Phase I
ESA for City review. The report will identify data gaps in our
assessment, our efforts to fill them, and comments on whether the data
gaps are significant and affect our overall findings.
Preparing a final report incorporating City comments, as appropriate.
25
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 14
Additionally, an ACM and LBP survey will be conducted of the existing building
on the residential property by RGA Environmental, Inc. (RGA), as a
subconsultant to Landau Associates, to identify ACM and LBP, if present.
ACM will require removal prior to demolition of the structure. The presence of
LBP will require special work practices during demolition and lead- containing
building materials will require characterization prior to disposal.
The survey of the existing building on the residential property will include the
following activities:
Inventory of suspect ACM within the residence by a building inspector
accredited under the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986
including:
o Identification of approximate quantities and locations of suspect
ACM
o Collection of up to 35 samples of visible suspect ACM
o Submittal of samples of suspect ACM to a laboratory accredited by
the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for analysis
of asbestos by polarized light microscopy.
Collection of up to 12 samples of painted surfaces from throughout the
residence and submittal of samples to an accredited laboratory for
analysis of lead by Flame Atomic Absorption (AA) for Total Lead reported
in parts per million (PPM)
Collection of one bulk building material sample for lead analysis for
waste disposal characterization (using the toxicity leaching procedure
analysis)
The results of the ACM and LBP survey will be summarized in a technical
memorandum. Attached 1
provided by RGA including
locations of ACM and LBP
and /or LBP identified,
considerations based on
analysis.
Assumptions
the technical memorandum will be information
the analytical results, figures showing the specific
in the residence, the estimated quantities of ACM
.nd worker protection and materials disposal
he results of the ACM and LBP sampling and
The residential property consists of a 0.28 -acre parcel that consists of
two pieces; the existing residential building occupies the southern -most
portion, and undeveloped land occupies the northern -most portion. The
northern -most portion of the parcel is not included in the Phase I ESA
for the residential property.
The City will provide copies of available environmental information
about the residential and easement properties including any previous
investigations or surveys.
26
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 15
The City will provide Landau Associates a completed copy of the "User
Provided Information Request Form" prior to completion of the Draft
Phase I ESA report. Landau Associates will provide the blank form.
The City will arrange for access and any necessary rights -of -entry to the
residential and easement properties.
The City will provide access to individuals /owners /tenants familiar with
historical operations at the residential and easement properties.
Conditions at immediately adjoining properties may not be observable
from accessible roads on the residential and easement properties or
from public access areas and, as a result, may not be identified during
the site reconnaissance.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft Phase I ESA and Screening
Level Environmental Assessment report and the draft ACM and LBP
Survey technical memorandum.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copies of the final Phase I
ESA and Screening -Level Environmental Assessment report and the
final ACM and LBP Survey technical memorandum.
Task No. 6.05 Biological Assessment (BA) Section 7 Endangered Species
Act (ESA); Magnuson- Stevens Act Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Evaluation
Landau Associates will prepare a BA for selected species federally listed as
threatened or endangered in the action area under the ESA and EFH
Evaluation for the proposed project. Landau Associates will obtain updated
species lists from agency websites, request site specific species and habitat
information from the WDFW priority habitats and species database, and review
information from the Washington Natural Heritage Program.
Evaluation of specific project details, such as construction techniques and
equipment used, timing of construction, and best management practices
(BMPs) will be based on information provided by KPFF.
The report will establish the project action area, which incorporates the
furthest extent of both aquatic and terrestrial impacts. Appropriate
environmental baseline information and species history will be summarized in
the BA. A determination of "no effect" (NE) or "may effect, not likely to
adversely affect' (NLAA) is anticipated. The project is not expected to impact
EFH.
Landau Associates will prepare a draft BA and EFH for review and comment by
KPFF and the City, and then a final document.
27
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 16
Assumptions
The BA will be drafted using the current WSDOT template.
30% to 60% level of design will be sufficient for preparation of the BA
and EFH Evaluation report.
The project will have a NE or NLAA determination on listed species or
their designated critical habitat and a formal Biological Opinion will not
be required. The project will have no adverse impact to EFH.
WSDOT BA procedures for calculating the extent of aquatic impacts will
be used.
At the request of the Federal funding agency, this task includes
participation at two meetings with agency staff from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Fisheries. The meetings are assumed to be at the
agency offices in Olympia, and include travel to /from Landau
Associates' Edmonds office.
The proposed project does not include in -water pile driving or blasting.
This task includes efforts to perform one 6 -month update review of
species listings. These efforts do not include analysis of project impacts
to additional species.
Design and construction details required for permit applications that are
not directly related to a critical areas determination will be provided to
the Landau Associates biologist. Such elements include, but are not
limited to, stormwater drainage report; temporary sediment and erosion
control plan; proposed construction timing, sequencing and duration;
and primary types of construction equipment to be used.
The budget and scope does not include monitoring of any federally listed
or state listed species during construction activities. Should any
monitoring of these species be required, an addendum to this scope and
budget can be prepared.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft BA and EFH Evaluation
report.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copies of the final BA and
EFH Evaluation report.
Task No. 6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation
Landau Associates will obtain the services of Equinox Research and Consulting
International Inc. (ERCI) to support the City in determining cultural resources
in the project area in compliance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation
Act and the Governor's Executive Order 05 -05.
ERCI will perform the following activities under Task 6.05:
28
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 17
Assist the client in developing an Area of Potential Effects (APE).
Prepare for and participate in project related meetings as requested.
Carry out background research on the project and study area including
reviewing the research previously carried out by Landau Associates.
Design and implement archaeological field testing for prehistoric and
historic period sites Landau Associates estimate 40 or fewer shovel
tests will be required to test the areas of the project that are not covered
with asphalt or otherwise inaccessible.
Fill out archaeological site /isolate inventory forms for all sites
encountered during testing.
Determine eligibility (National Register of Historic Places) on all sites
encountered during testing.
Analyze survey results and prepare recommendations in a report in
compliance with tribal, federal, or/ and state regulations.
Landau Associates will assist ERCI in identifying the Area of Potential Effects,
provide coordination of field services, and provide report review for consistency
with other project documents.
Assumptions
Human remains will not be found during field testing.
A Memorandum of Agreement (federal process for disturbing an
archaeological site) or State Permit Application for site disturbance is
not included in this scope.
Preparation of Historic Property Inventory Forms is not included in this
scope.
Deliverables
Draft and final Cultural Resources Assessment report, including
required digital and up to 5 paper copies of final report required for
agency review/ approval.
29
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 18
Task No. 6.07 Shoreline Permit Submittal
Landau Associates will prepare additional documentation as required by the
Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) for a shoreline substantial development permit.
Landau Associates will complete the City's Shoreline Permit application and
associated documentation, including a SEPA Checklist (see Task 6.02), two
sets of mailing list labels and a figure for property owners within 500 ft of the
project. Information required as part of the application also includes five
copies of the following:
Description of project consistency with decision criteria
Vicinity map
Shoreline Site plans (top of bank, landward catch point toe of levee,
riverbank toe, mean high water mark, and 100 -year base flood elevation,
appropriate setbacks, maintenance easements, limits of construction)
Sensitive area study documentation and plans
Cross sections
Landscape plans
Civil plans
Landau Associates will prepare the City of Tukwila Tree Clearing Permit
application, which will be included with the Shoreline Permit application
package. The "description of project consistency with decision criteria"
listed above will include reference to the City's tree regulations.
Assumptions
The City will pay all the applicable permit application fees.
Landau Associates staff attendance at a Hearing Examiner meeting is
included in this scope of services.
A tree survey will be completed by KPG and incorporated into the plans.
Trees to be identified are (Cottonwood excluded) 4 inches or more in
diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade and cottonwoods 12 inch
dbh (diameter breast high) or greater within 100 ft of the river.
Construction will begin within two years of permit approval and be
completed within five years.
30% design plans will be suitable for the permit application, and the
City will waive the requirement that civil plans be stamped, signed and
dated by a licensed professional engineer as part of the permit
application.
30
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 19
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft Shoreline Permit application
submittals.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and required paper copies of the final
Shoreline Permit application submittal(s).
Task No. 6.08 Wetland /Waterway Delineation
Landau Associates will conduct wetland delineations in accordance with the
2010 USACE Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. The
ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of waterways, including the Green River,
will be delineated using guidance provided in Ecology's Determining The
Ordinary High Water Mark on Streams in Washington State.
Landau Associates will compile and review environmental information from
readily available public domain resources to gain a general understanding of
potential wetland issues at the site. Public domain resources include, but are
not limited to:
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey data
National Wetlands Inventory mapping
Local Critical Areas mapping
U.S. Geological Survey topographic mapping
Recent aerial photography
The field investigation will include an examination of vegetation, soils, and
hydrology within the study area between the Baker Boulevard/ Christensen
Road intersection to the west shoulder of West Valley Highway. Flagging will
be placed along the wetland /waterway boundaries and will be confined to the
project footprint. Any wetland /waterway habitat that extends beyond the
project footprint, and within 200 ft, will be estimated both visually and using
public domain resources to assess wetland extent. Included in this task is
time to provide the project surveyors with a hand sketch of wetland /waterway
boundaries to assist the surveyors to locate project flagging. We also included
time to review the survey map and request any necessary changes to
accurately represent existing wetland /waterway conditions.
Wetlands within the study area will be rated in accordance with Ecology's
Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, and buffer
widths will be determined in compliance with the Critical Areas Regulations.
Stream typing and buffer widths are based on Chapter 18.45 of the TMC, and
the water typing system presented in Chapter 222 -15 -131 of the Washington
Administrative Code (WAC).
31
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 20
Landau Associates will prepare a draft Wetland and Waterway Delineation
Report in a format acceptable to the City and other regulating agencies that
will include:
A summary of the methodology used
The size and rating of each wetland and waterway; a characterization of
wetland vegetation, soils, and hydrology; and field data sheets
A scaled site map showing the locations of wetland /waterway
boundaries and buffers, locations of wetland data plots, and site
topography
Supporting photographs
The draft report will be provided to KPFF and the City for review. Comments
will be reviewed and incorporated into a Final Wetland and Waterway
Delineation Report. The delineation report will be used in pre application
meetings for the purposes of discussing potential project impacts and
determination of agency jurisdiction.
Assumptions
Flagging will be placed only within the project boundaries where
accessible.
KPFF will supply survey information in AutoCAD format to Landau
Associates pertaining to the delineation and project plans.
The results of the delineation and delineation report will be used in
developing the 30% design.
Avoidance of impacts to wetlands and the Green River is an integral part
of the design to avoid the need for USACE permits for in -water work.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy the draft and three paper copies of final
Wetland and Waterway Delineation Report
Task No. 6.09 Critical Areas Report
Landau Associates will support the project team in the calculation of the area
of impacts to wetlands, waterways, and /or their buffers based on the 30%
project plans. Areas of impact will be calculated in AutoCAD and will be
summarized in the Critical Areas Report described below.
Landau Associates will support the project team in determining adequate
wetland /waterway impact avoidance measures. A conceptual compensatory
mitigation plan will be developed by Landau Associates for unavoidable
impacts to buffers. The conceptual compensatory mitigation will include a
planting plan.
32
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 21
Landau Associates will prepare a draft Critical Areas Report in accordance with
Chapter 18.45 of the TMC, and to meet standards of other state regulatory
agencies. The report will include information from the Wetland and Waterway
Delineation Report, and incorporate any necessary mitigation. This will
include:
A summary of the methodology used
A description of impacts to wetland buffers and /or shoreline buffers
A conceptual buffer mitigation planting plan (equivalent to 30% level)
including: mitigation goals, objectives, and performance standards; a
timeline for mitigation monitoring and reporting; and contingency plans,
as necessary
The draft report will be provided to KPFF and the City /agencies for review.
Comments will be reviewed and incorporated into a Final Critical Areas Report
for Wetlands and Waterways.
Assumptions
Impacts to wetlands and below the OHWM of waterways will be avoided.
Project impacts will be limited to buffers only.
Formal specifications will not be required as part of the report and /or
conceptual design.
Buffer mitigation can be accommodated on site (within the project
limits). If offsite mitigation is required, the City will identify a suitable
site to accommodate the required mitigation and potential out -of -scope
work will be determined at that time.
Conceptual mitigation plans and notes will not be incorporated into the
overall plan set until the 60% level (see Task 6.10).
KPFF will be responsible for coordination with the City and Landau
Associates during review and finalization of the document bid package.
30% design plans will be suitable for impact calculation and
development of conceptual mitigation plans.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and paper copy of the draft Critical Areas
Report for Wetlands and Waterways.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copy of the Final Critical
Areas Report for Wetlands and Waterways.
33
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 22
Task No. 6.10 -Mitigation Construction Documents
This task consists of the design services necessary to prepare and complete the
construction documents for the mitigation design discussed in the Critical
Areas Report. Landau Associates will be responsible for submitting
construction documents at the 60 percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent levels.
Landau Associates will prepare Divisions 2 through 9 of the Special Provisions
(or equal sections if in a different specifications format) for the mitigation
component of the proposed project. It is understood that only those divisions
that are necessary for work related to the mitigation component of the
proposed project will be included. The format will be the Washington State
Department of Transportation's standard format.
Landau Associates will prepare estimated quantities and associated costs for
the mitigation planting design. The estimate will be based on the plans and
specifications and will be prepared in accordance with the format established
by the City.
It is assumed that KPFF will provide examples of the most current
specifications, estimated quantities and associated costs, bid tabs, and any
AutoCAD base files needed to complete the plan set.
Assumptions
It is assumed that the mitigation planting area will not exceed 1 acre.
Permanent irrigation design is not included in this task.
Grading design and grading plans are not included in this task.
A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is not included in this
scope. Some erosion control design is anticipated, but any erosion
control elements are expected to be minor and be coordinated with KPFF
for incorporation into the TESC plan(s) done by others.
A Notice of Intent, a Construction Stormwater General Permit and /or a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is not included in this task.
The CAD drawings produced will be based on Landau Associates
standard in -house format. If specific CAD standards beyond this are
needed, that information will be provided to Landau Associates.
Deliverables
Plans, specifications, and estimated quantities and associated costs for
the mitigation planting design each at 60 percent, 90 percent, and 100
percent submittals (up to 3 sheets, 22- x 34 -inch sheets at full size)
Items included in each submittal are as follows:
34
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 23
30 Percent Submittal (conceptual plan as part of Task 6.09)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format).
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 60% level plan set (3 sheets in PDF format)
o Specification Outline (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format)
o Response to City 30% Comments (via email or Microsoft Word
format)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sheets in PDF format)
o Draft Specifications (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (via email or Microsoft Word
format)
Final PS &E Submittal:
o Final plan set (3 sheets in PDF format and one signed original full
sized set)
Final Specifications (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format)
Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format)
o Response to City 90% PSE comments (via email or Microsoft Word
format)
Task No. 6.11 Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application JARPA)
The DARPA will include project specific information including a list of
adjacent property owners. This task includes time for coordination and
revisions with KPFF, the City and /or agencies, as needed, to provide
accurate information on the DARPA, including a narrative of project
information.
The JARPA will be suitable for submittal to reviewing agencies, including
but not limited to WDFW for the Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), DNR,
and the City. Full- or half -size project drawings will be provided with
submittal to reviewing agencies. The SEPA threshold determination issued
by the City (DNS or mitigated DNS) must be included as part of the
submittal package to WDFW. Coordination with reviewing agencies
regarding the DARPA is in included in Task 16.01.
35
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 24
Assumptions
The project will not include any dredge /fill activity in any waters of the
U.S. and will not require a Section 404 permit from the USACE.
The Green River is not a navigable waterway subject to regulation under
Section 10 of the Rivers Harbor Act.
Project plans will include a survey of the OHWM.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft DARPA for review and
approval.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final JARPA and three paper
copies of the final DARPA.
Task No. 6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement
DNR will require an Application for Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic
Lands for the bridge crossing over the Green River. Landau Associates will
complete the application form and include a copy of the DARPA as a component
of the submittal to DNR. Coordination with DNR regarding Application for
Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands in included in Task 16.01.
Assumptions
The project will not include any dredge /fill activity in any waters of the
U.S. and will not require a Section 404 permit from the USACE.
The Green River is not a navigable waterway subject to regulation under
Section 10 of the Rivers Harbor Act.
Project plans will include a survey of the OHWM.
All other agency permits will be included with the application.
Deliverables
An electronic (MS Word) copy of the draft Application for Authorization
to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands for review and approval.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final Application for Authorization
to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands.
Task 7.0 Project Workshops
Task No. 7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick -Off Meeting
The team shall meet to discuss the previous work completed on the project and
develop an approach to move forward to be shared and discussed in a project
kick off meeting with the City.
36
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 25
Task No. 7.02 TSL Review Project Kick Of Meeting
The team shall meet with the City to review the work completed for the TSL
Study and discuss the preferred alternative being advance through
construction documents.
Task No. 7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop
The team shall meet with the City to discuss tied arch concepts.
Task No. 7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
The team shall meet with the City to discuss approach concepts.
Task No. 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop
The team shall meet with the City to finalize the tied arch and approach
concepts.
Task No. 7.06 Public Outreach
KPFF and LMN shall support the City by attending and supplying the following
graphics for a single public outreach meeting.
Workshop Graphics
o Tied Arch Alternative Sketches
West Approach Sketches
East Approach Sketches
Connection Detail Sketches
Surface Finish Examples
Color Examples
37
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 26
Deliverables
Preferred Alternative Graphics
o (1) One physical Study level model, scale to be determined.
o (6) Six "Sketch -Up" quality renderings
Attendance at the TSL Review 8s Project Kick -Off Meeting including the
creation of the agenda and graphics.
Attendance at the Tied Arch Workshop including the creation of the
agenda and graphics.
Attendance at the West and East Approaches Workshop including the
creation of the agenda and graphics.
Attendance at the Final Overall Concept Workshop including the
creation of the agenda and graphics.
Attendance at a one (1) Public Outreach meeting including creation of
graphics.
Task 8.0 Civil Engineering
KPFF shall perform the civil engineering support work necessary to finalize the
concept and complete construction documents for the project.
Task No. 8.01 Concept Workshops and Preferred Alternative Selection
KPFF will assist in the development of approach alternatives for presentation
in the workshops outlined in Task No. 7.0.
Upon completion of the selection of the preferred alternative, KPFF shall move
the following civil engineering tasks forward through complete construction
documents.
Task No. 8.02 Site Preparation and Demolition
KPFF shall identify demolition and other site preparation work necessary for
the construction of the pedestrian facility.
38
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 27
Task No. 8.03 Horizontal and Vertical Layout
KPFF shall establish a construction horizontal and vertical alignment for the
pedestrian trail and bridge based on project control points and benchmarks.
This work shall also include design and layout of other related facilities such
as ADA ramps, curb ramps, etc, necessary for the pedestrian trail to tie to
existing grade and necessary grades established for the pedestrian bridge.
This work shall also include design and layout for accommodating vehicular
crossing of the pedestrian trail, and design of features to address safety for this
issue.
Work shall also include rechannelization of Baker Boulevard. to reconfigure the
roadway from four lanes to two lanes and bike lanes and parking. Work
includes reconstruction of curb returns for curb bulbs for development of
parking.
KPFF shall develop plans for new vehicular accesses identified within the
parking lot circulation study, task 8.08.
Task No. 8.04 Grading and Paving
KPFF shall develop the necessary typical sections and proposed terrain model,
and establish finish grade and grading limits for the improvements. KPFF shall
develop cross sections at a 25 -foot interval showing the existing and proposed
grades. KPFF will meet with and coordinate with King County Flood District
and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) personnel to coordinate, protect,
and address their concerns with the project and anticipated construction and
disturbance within the western Levee of the Green River. (Assume 2 meetings).
Assumptions
No finish grade contours are included in this work. All grades will be
established with the proposed horizontal alignment, vertical alignment,
and typical section.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
City will obtain necessary permits with the (USACE) for abutment work
in the Levee.
Task No. 8.05 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control
KPFF shall prepare temporary erosion control plans and details. Plans will be
prepared to a format consistent with the KCSWDM and the City's standard
details.
39
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 28
Assumptions
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for the
City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be included in the plan
set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
General notes are not included in this work.
Task No. 8.06 Surface Water
KPFF shall prepare a storm drainage technical information report (TIR)
following general format of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design
Manual (KCSWDM) to identify runoff volumes. TIR shall not address all core
requirements for the project improvement. It will, however, address decisions
regarding stormwater impacts and verification of existing conveyance
capacities. Draft TIR shall be submitted with the 30% design documents.
Final TIR will be submitted during the completion of the PSE package,
incorporating City comments.
KPFF shall also study to find if any areas will be suitable for infiltration of
storm water runoff, and integrate infiltration facilities to the extent determined
by the City.
Storm drainage plans will be developed to show necessary modifications to the
existing drainage facilities.
Assumptions
Water quality facilities will not be required due to the non pollution
generating characteristics of pedestrian facilities.
Detention is required. The project site currently drains to the Green
River.
Work includes plans showing storm drainage profiles. Pipe lengths,
types, and invert elevations will be shown.
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for
the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Dept. of
Transportation (WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be
included in the plan set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
Terrain model information for off -site runoff assessment will be provided
by the City.
40
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 29
Task No. 8.07 Utilities
KPFF shall design necessary relocations for City owned or privately
owned utilities disturbed by the project.
KPFF shall coordinate identification of utility relocations for any
franchise utilities being disturbed within public Right of Way (R /W).
KPFF shall meet and coordinate with Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) to
coordinate, protect, and address their concerns with the project and
their existing 60 -inch waterline. (Assume 3 meetings).
Assumptions
Private utilities shall be located by survey, and are not included within
this task.
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for
the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be
included in the plan set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
Potholing for determining utility depths is not included in this work. The
City will be responsible for coordinating with the utility companies to
perform any required potholing.
Necessary utility relocations will be shown on the Storm and Utility
Plans. Due to the small amount of anticipated work, separate utility
plans are not included at this time.
Work addresses existing utilities. No new utility construction is
currently included in this work.
Task No. 8.08 Channelization and Signing
KPFF shall design necessary channelization, roadway signing, and striping
work for the proposed construction and to address impacts to the existing
parking layout on site.
Work shall also include a study to identify alternative driveway relocation and
internal circulation for Riverview Plaza's parking lot.
Work shall also include rechannelization of Baker Boulevard from Andover
Park W. to Christensen Road. to change configuration from four lanes to two
lanes with bike lanes and parking, per configuration provided and negotiated
with the City. This work will also include turning movement assessment for
reconstruction of the curb returns.
41
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 30
Assumptions
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for
the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Dept. of
Transportation WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be
included in the plan set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% Design submittal.
Pedestrian trail facilities and wayfinding signs are not included in this
task.
Temporary traffic control and temporary pedestrian route plans are not
currently included in this work.
City will facilitate coordination of rechannelization of Baker Boulevard
with the other City departments.
Task No. 8.09 Cost Estimate
KPFF shall compile construction quantities for work identified on the Plans.
The cost estimate shall be based upon WSDOT Standard Specifications and
Standard Item Table. These quantities and costs shall be updated for each
submittal and shall include backup documentation for each item quantity.
Assumptions
City shall provide copies of their latest bid tabulations for recent public
works contracts.
City shall provide unit cost for easements needed, including acquisition,
appraisal, etc.
Task No. 8.10 Specifications
KPFF shall compile specifications for civil work. 60% submittal shall be an
outline of identified sections within WSDOT Standard Specifications and
identified Special Provisions. 90% and 100% shall include all special
provisions required for the bid items identified.
Assumptions
City shall provide all front end documents and Contract Boilerplate for
specifications.
Deliverables (Electronic and Hard Copies)
Anticipated Civil Plan Sheets (Sheet Count: ±23)
o Site Preparation (3 sheets)
o TESC Plans (2 sheets)
o TESC Detail (1 sheet)
42
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 31
o Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
o Plan /Profile sheets (3 sheets)
o Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
o Utility (3 sheets)
o Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
30% Submittal
Draft Technical Information Report (Drainage Report)
Site Preparation (3 sheets)
TESC Plans (2 sheets)
o Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile sheets (3 sheets)
Drainage (3 sheets)
Utility (3 sheets)
o Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
0 60% level plan set (3 sets 1 1x17)
Specification Outline (3 copies)
Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)
Final PS &E Submittal:
o Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Final Specifications (3 copies)
43
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 32
o Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies)
Task 9.0 Structural Engineering
KPFF shall perform the structural engineering work.
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the Plans, Specifications, and
Estimate (PSE) design phase of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/ Bicycle
Bridge.
Task No. 9.01 Basis of Design
KPFF shall submit a written basis of design to summarize the design process
and criteria.
Task No. 9.02 Bridge Design
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design for the pedestrian
bridge. The design shall include the bridge superstructure and foundations
from the Green River levee on the river's west side to the triangular property on
the river's east side.
Components of the bridge design shall include the following items:
Deep foundations such as piles or shafts for support of the abutments.
West and east abutment substructures
Arch design
o Arch steel pipes
o Arch connection to the abutments
o Arch tension ties and tie connections
Arch connections
Deck superstructure framing
Deck slab
Deck safety railings
Arch suspension hangers and associated connection
44
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 33
Task No. 9.03 West Approach Ramp Design
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of the west
landing ramp. The design shall be ADA compliant and include the ramp
superstructure and foundations.
Components of the west approach ramp design shall include the following
items:
Approximately 200 feet of ramp structure
Four (4) shaft foundations
Four (4) concrete columns
Structural earth walls
Steel superstructure
Deck slab
Hand railing
Task No. 9.04 East Approach Ramp Design
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of the east
landing ramp. The design shall be ADA compliant and include the ramp
superstructure and foundations.
Components of the east approach ramp design shall include the following
items:
Approximately 100 feet of ramp structure
Four (3) shaft foundations
Four (3) concrete columns
Structural earth walls
Steel superstructure
Deck slab
Hand railing
45
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 34
Task No. 9.05 Miscellaneous Structures
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of miscellaneous
structures such as way finding signs, retaining walls, etc.
Miscellaneous structures shall include the following items:
Wayfinding sign supports and foundations
Protective structures for existing utilities
Structural retaining walls
Lighting supports and foundations
Deliverables (Electronic and Hard Copies)
Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count: ±58):
General Notes Abbreviations
General Plan Elevation
Horizontal Control Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
Foundation Layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan 8s Elevation
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan Elevation
East Abutment Details
Superstructure Layout
Arch Plan Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Tension Tie Details
Deck Framing Plan 8v Elevation (2 Sheets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
46
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 35
o Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
o Deck Vertical Support Details (3 Sheets)
o West Approach Plan Elevation
o West Approach Foundation Plan Elevation
o West Approach Superstructure Sections
o West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
o West Approach Deck Sections
o West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
o East Approach Plan Elevation
o East Approach Foundation Plan Elevation
o East Approach Superstructure Sections
o East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
o East Approach Deck Sections
o East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
o Main Span Handrail Layout Details (2 Sheets)
o West Approach Handrail Layout Details
o East Approach Handrail Layout Details
o Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
30 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Draft Basis of Design
0 30% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
0 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17)
Specification Outline (3 copies)
Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)
47
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 36
Final PS&E Submittal:
Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
Final Specifications (3 copies)
Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 90% PSE Comments (3 Copies)
Task 10.0 Bridge Aesthetics Collaboration
LMN will collaborate with the team on overall bridge approach structure
aesthetics, and will provide documentation supporting the PSE effort.
Task No. 10.01 Design Development and Coordination (30% PSE)
LMN shall submit a written Draft Basis of Design to summarize the
architectural design process and criteria, and shall provide design option
graphics for design workshops. LMN shall document, in drawings, the Draft
Basis of Design for the 30 Percent PS&E Submittal. In addition to Preferred
Alternative Graphics included in the deliverables below, LMN shall coordinate
the development of presentation renderings.
Architectural coordination will be conducted for the following components:
Bridge Structure
Arch geometry coordination
Arch color
Arch connections to:
Suspension cables
Bridge deck
West/ East abutments
Arch ties
Arch -to -arch lateral support
Suspension cables
Bridge deck
Handrail system
Light Fixture Coordination
Approach Ramps
Column treatments
Superstructure treatments
48
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 37
Deck treatments
Structural earthwall treatments
Handrail system
Creation of 30 Percent PS&E Submittal:
Draft Basis of Design
30% level plan set (3 sets- l lx17)
Task No. 10.02 Design Development and Coordination (60% -100
LMN shall provide architectural design and documentation services for the
pedestrian bridge and east and west approaches for the 60, 90, and 100
Percent PS&E Submittals. Work shall include refinement of the Draft Basis of
Design, coordinating the architectural design with associated engineering
disciplines, construction documentation of the architectural components of the
design, and preparation of architectural specifications.
Deliverables
Workshop Graphics:
Tied Arch Alternative Sketches
West Approach Sketches
East Approach Sketches
o Connection Detail Sketches
o Surface Finish Examples
o Color Examples
Preferred Alternative Graphics:
o (1) One physical Study level model, scale to be determined.
o (6) Six "Sketch -Up" quality renderings.
Architectural Plan Sheets (Assume a sheet count of 10 sheets):
Codes, Notes And Symbols
Enlarged Elevations
Enlarged Bridge Sections (2 Sheets)
Enlarged Arch Miscellaneous Details (2 Sheets)
Lighting/ Electrical Routing Details
Enlarged East Approach Sections
Enlarged West Approach Sections
Bridge Handrail Sections
49
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 38
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
o 60% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Specification Outline (3 copies)
o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)
Final PS &E Submittal:
Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
Final Specifications (3 copies)
Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies)
Task 11.0 -Urban Design and Wag finding
Task No. 11.01 Illumination
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for lighting for walkway,
bridge approaches, and bridge. Work includes aesthetic fixtures, conduits,
wiring and coordination of electrical power connection services with local
power company. The Consultant shall evaluate lighting performance
throughout the project using the AG132 illumination model.
Task No. 11.02 Wayfinding and Furnishings
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for wayfinding signage, and
potential pedestrian furniture (i.e. litter receptacles, benches, trail railings
(outside of bridge if required), etc.). Area for wayfinding includes Christensen
Road at Baker Blvd. east leading to Green River and West Valley Highway to
the a designated pathway on the east side of WVH (which also leads to the
Tukwila Station).
Task No. 11.03 Landscape and Irrigation
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for planting design and
irrigation design (including irrigation controller, water source point of
connection)
50
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 39
Task No. 11.04 Walkway Section/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE aesthetic details for walkway
section (note Civil Engineering by KPFF) and 30 %/60% parking lot layout
concepts for trail alignment studies through private property (Christensen
Road to Green River Trail (note after alignment has been selected KPFF will
provide Civil Engineering of Trail to Final PSE.)
Deliverables
Trail Alignment Alternatives and Selected Alternative Plan (including
conceptual parking lot reconfigurations
Anticipated Sheets:
o West Approach Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details
o West Approach Enlarged Landscape Plans and Details and
Hardscape Details
o East Approach Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details
East Approach Enlarged Landscape Plans and Details and
Hardscape Details
Trail and Bridge Lighting Plan and Details
o Wayfinding Signage /Site Furnishing/ Trail Railings Plan and Details
o Survey Basemap in two phases
30 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Draft Basis of Design
o 30% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
o 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17)
o Specification Outline (3 copies)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS&.E Submittal:
o 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Updates Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)Final PS&.E Submittal:
o Final plan set (3 sets 11x17)
51
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 40
Final Specifications (3 copies)
Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies)
Task 13.0 Signal Design
KPG shall provide pedestrian signal design for the crossing of West Valley Highway
(SR 181), approximately midway between Strander Blvd. and Longacres Way and
signal modifications at the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard.
This work will include coordination with WSDOT to obtain WSDOT approval.
Depending on selection criteria(warrants) the signal could be Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacon (Hawk) signal. The location assumes no driveway /street intersection. Also
coordination with Tukwila Signal Maintenance Department shall be required at
the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard.
The following additional assumptions were made to provide direction to the
design:
No property acquisition will be required and the project will be designed
within the existing public right -of -way with no additional right -of -way
required.
Verification of aerial and underground conflicts at signal foundation
locations, will be required.
Any permitting will be a part of the larger project and not tied to the
signal design.
Survey will be provided for both sides of WVH and the needed
approaches for the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard.
Electrical connections and potential trenching will be drawn
schematically to closet source, unless it is in vicinity of the signal.
Geotechnical for the project will be the basis for foundation /pole design.
Task 13.01 WSDOT Coordination
KPG shall coordinate with WSDOT an approval process for the signal
installation, including warrant analysis. Work includes preparing signal plans
and specifications for WSDOT review and approval, including final plan and
specifications approval for the city records.
Task 13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Hwy Design
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for pedestrian signal design.
Works includes coordinating with the City including any decorative and urban
elements for the signal pole design, channelization and signing plans, center
52
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 41
median/ crosswalk design, etc. Signal design shall meet WSDOT /City of
Tukwila standards.
Task 13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for Andover Park E and
Baker Boulevard intersection signal modifications. Works includes
coordinating with the City for temporary video detection installation, junction
box loop splicing, channelization and signing plans, etc. Signal design shall
meet City of Tukwila standards.
Task 14.0 Right -of -Way Services
This task will include the preparation of right -of -way plans and legal descriptions.
It is assumed at this time that determining property values and conducting land
acquisition negotiations is not a part of this scope of work and will be added at a
future date as necessary.
Task 14.01 Legal Description
KPG shall provide legal descriptions and exhibit maps for three parcels.
Task 14.02 Right -Of -Way Plan
KPG shall provide right -of -way plans including existing right -of -way research
and calculations, proposed alignment calculations, including a draft plan.
Task 14.03 Title Reports
KPG shall order title reports, review reports for legal descriptions and
easements. KPG will also obtain legal description for DNR lease, determine
ordinary high water line and prepare record of survey per DNR specifications.
Task 15.0 Construction Support Services
The project team can provide construction support to the City as the project
design is completed and the project goes to advertisement and then construction.
Tasks could include attending preconstruction meetings, answering contractors'
requests for information (RFI), submittal review and site visits. The scope and fee
for this task will be determined at a later date.
53
Exhibit E -1
Consultant Fee Determination Sheet Summary
(Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost Per Unit of Work)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification
Man Hours
Principal (Structural)
112.0 x
Principal (Civil)
34.0 x
Project Manager (Structural)
606.0 x
Project Manager (Civil)
683.0 x
Senior Engineer (Structural)
1468.0 x
Senior Engineer (Civil)
40.0 x
Project Engineer (Civil)
418.0 x
Design Engineer II (STR)
1020.0 x
Design Engineer I (STR)
0.0 x
Design Engineer (Civil)
663.0 x
CAD Tech (Structural)
1326.0 x
CAD Tech (Civil)
668.0
Project Coordinator (CIV)
114.0
Project Coordinator (STR)
158.0
Admin
0.0 x
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of
Reimbursables:
Itemized
SubConsultant Costs (See Exhibit G):
Grand Total
Prepared By: KPFF Consulting Engineers
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit E -1
Revised 06/05
Rate
65.00
65.00
60.00
50.00
45.00
50.00
42.00
40.00
40.00
38.00
35.00
35.00
22.00
20.00
18.00
Total DSC
128.46 x 307,068.00
30 x 307,068.00
Cost
7,280.00
2,210.00
36,360.00
34,150.00
66,060.00
2,000.00
17,556.00
40,800.00
0.00
25,194.00
46,410.00
23,380.00
2,508.00
3,160.00
0.00
307,068.00
394,459.55
92,120.40
0.00
573,932.16
1,367,580.11
Date: November 15, 2011
54
Exhibit G -1
Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
(Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, PedBicycle Bridge PSE
Sub Consultant: KPG
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification
Man Hours
Senior UD/LA
197.0
X
Project Sury
90.0
X
Designer LA /Survey
549.0
X
CAD Technician
701.0
X
Survey Crew
184.0
X
Office Admin
0.0
X
X
X
X
V:
64.90
56.56
40.13
31.25
47.66
23.08
Total DSC
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 163.1745 x
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 25 x
Reimbursables:
Itemized
SubConsultant Total
Grand Total
Prepared By: KPG
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1
Revised 01/09
70,582.76
70,582.76
D-9-9
12,785.30
5,090.40
22,031.37
21,906.25
8,769.44
0.00
70,582.76
115,173.07
17,645.69
7,450.00
210,851.52
Date: November 15, 2011
55
Exhibit G -1
Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
(Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, PedBicycle Bridge PSE
Sub Consultant: LMN Architects
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification Man Hours
Partner
Project Manager
Project Designer
Project Architect
Intern
Admin
Specs
QA /QC
156.0
322.0
404.0
378.0
467.0
37.0
68.0
52.0
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
B51W
72.84
39.42
44.23
34.86
23.56
18.75
39.42
38.42
Total DSC
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 190.47 x
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 25 %X$
Reimbursables:
Itemized
SubConsultant Total
Grand Total
Prepared By: LMN Architects
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1
Revised 01/09
71,476.95
71,476.95
Cost
11,363.04
12,693.24
17,868.92
13,177.08
11,002.52
693.75
2,680.56
1,997.84
71,476.95
136,142.15
17,869.24
5,000.00
230,488.33
Date: November 15, 2011
56
Exhibit G -1
Subconsultant Fee Determination Sheet Summary
(Mandatory when Subconsulatnats are utilized)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE
Sub Consultant: Landau Associates
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification Man Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal 12.0
x
65.00
780.00
Senior Associate 10.0
x
56.00
560.00
Associate 67.0
x
47.00
3,149.00
Senior 350.0
x
40.00
14,000.00
Senior Project 68.0
x
36.00
2,448.00
Project: 104.0
x
32.00
3,328.00
Senior Staff 16.0
x
30.00
480.00
Staff 98.0
x
25.00
2,450.00
Senior CAD 78.0
x
31.00
2,418.00
CAD /GIS Tech 7.0
x
24.00
168.00
Project Coord. 92.0
x
29.00
2,668.00
Support Staff 22.0
x
17.00
374.00
Total DSC
32,823.00
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 200.87
x
32,823.00
65,931.56
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 25
x
32,823.00
8,205.75
Reimbursables:
Itemized
25,632.00
SubConsultant Total
0.00
Grand Total
132,592.31
Prepared By: Landau Associates
Date:
November 15, 2011
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1
Revised 01/09
57
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ESTIMATE: City of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge
KPFF Prime
Management KPFFCMI KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Grand Total
Structural
1-0 Project Management and Administration
1.01 jProiactSchedule 1
$4,962 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
1 $1,514 1
$0 1
1 $6,476
1.02 lOssign Team Supplemental Agreements 1
$1,241 1
1 $0 f
f $0 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $1,241
1.03 Progress Reports 1
$3,102 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
1 $2,202 1
$0 1
1 $5,304
1.04 Invoices 1
$3,102 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
1 $2,202 1
$0 1
1 $5,304
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) I
$0 1
1 $0 1
1 $12,469 1
1 $11,535 1
$0 1
1 $24,003
Consultant Meetings w/ City (Assume 12 meeting l
$6,513 1
1 $2,326 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $8,839
Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meeting) l
$6,513 1
1 $3,102 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $9,615
1[ Reimbursablesl
$0
$0 1
1 $250 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $250
Subtotal
$25432
$5428
$12719 1
1 $17452 1
$0 I
I r-1-1,
2..
4.61 Field E%plOratiOns and LaporSiory I esting $u 1 $U 1 $o 1 $U 1 $4,243 I $4,243
4.02 Geoterhnical evaluation, Reporting, and Meetings I $0 1 $0 1 s0 I $0 1 $10,148 I $10,146
4.03 Review of Report and Comments I t0 1 82,161 1 t0 1 $U I $0 I $2,181
Reimbursablesl 30 I $o I t0 I 1U I $14,158 I $14,156
Subtotal
�:w l f �iY "i" "a�aC. h'ai uiu 'Nlkuu'm:ss uliwt w:wdml.,».,Rmm ,.::..y::n ...�...'�;x F R ,'R, ww. +wrwu�:L`tiie iGuv,s,v �,'l., n
5.0 Hydreullce (KPFF Clvlit
5.01 Meet with Agencies I $u 1 $3,015 1 $u I $0 I $u I $3,515 l
5.02 Establish 100 -Tear Floodolain I $0 1 13,949 1 $O 1 to I to I 13,949 1
5.03 Establish Structural Clearance 1 t0 1 $1,469 1 SO I 10 I to I 81,489
Reimbursablesl to 1 $u I Su 1 to I to I $0
Subtotal 5 I. t
,x,h, ,ii; �;;.;;;:z x x,x, in
n ronmen an rot n cps n au
6.01 Ie2m, Agenc7, and Pre- App710nion Meetings I so 1 $u 1 $U I $U I 319,166 1 $19,166
6.02 SEPA Checklist I $0 1 $2,068 I $0 I $0 I 2,956 1 $5,044
6.03 WSW I Local Programs ECS l $0 1 11,365 I t0 I t0 1 $3,594 1 $4,960
6.04 Phase Environmental Site Assessment I t0 1 $U 1 10 I 10 1 $6,434 1 $6,434
6.05 Biological Assessment/EFH I t0 I $3,101 1 $0 I 50 1 $11,467 1 $15, 1ti9
6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation I to 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $1,421 I $1,421
6.07 Shoreline Permit I to I $2,1o9 1 t0 I to 1 $7,290
t9,399
6.08 Wetland/Waterway Delineation 1
1 SO $0 1 1U I to 1 I 19,251
6.09 Critical Areas Report I $U I $3,350 I t0 I $0 1 $10,960,96 6 1 $14,315
6.10 Mitigation Construction Documents I to 1 $O I $0 I $0 1 $14,061 1 114,051
6.11 IAHPA I $0 1 $1,241 1 $0 I S0 1 12,369 1 $3,610
6.12 Aquatic Lands tasement I to 1 $u I to
1 $U I $1.594 1 $1,594
Reimbursablesl $u I y $u 1 $u 1 $u I $11,4x6 I $11x16
Subtotal. II
a!�w
7A Prolect Workshops
7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick-Off Meeting 1 $2,378 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 I $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,100
7.02 TSL Review& Protect Kick-Off Meeting 1 $2,378 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 I $6,100
7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop 1 $2,895 1 $1,034 1 $748 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,154
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,608 1 $0 1 $3,608
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop 1 $2,895 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,617
West Approach 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,419 1 $0 1 $2,419
East Approach 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,419 1 $0 1 $2,419
7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop 1 $3,618 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 I $7,340
Connection Detail Sketches 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,014 1 $0 1 $3,014
Surface Finish Examples 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,737 1 $0 1 $1,737
Color Examples 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,737 1 $0 1 $1,737
Study Model Development 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,368 I $0 1 $4,368
Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6) 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,305 1 $0 1 $2,305
7.06 Public Outreach 1 $3,618 1 $1,034 1 $0 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,130
Graphics 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $12,110 1 $O 1 $12,110
Reimbursables $0 1 $0 1 $200 1 $2.500 1 $0 52,700
8.01 Concept WoriOhop and Preferred Aft Selection 1 $0 1 $5,479 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,479
8.02 Site Prep and Demolition 1 $0 1 $4,342 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,342
8.03 Horizontal and Vertical Layout 1 $0 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Route Layout 1 $0 1 $1,902 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,902
Horizontal Control 1 $0 1 $1,385 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,385
Ramp transitions 1 $0 1 $2,605 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,605
Vertical Alignment $0 $1,861 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,861
Vehicular Crossingof Trail $0 I $2,688 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $2,688
Rechannelization Baker St 1 $0 I $6,038 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,038
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction 1 $0 I $6,823 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $6,823
8.04 Gretlingand Paving 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0
Terrain Model 1 $0 I $2,957 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,957
Typical Section 1 $0 1 $1,820 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $1,820
Coord with KCFD and USACE $0 I $2,988 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,988
Soy TESL 1 $0 1 $5,211 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $5,211
8.06 Surface Water 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 I $0
TIR 1 $0 I $8,571 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $8,571
Site Drainage 1 $0 I $4,197 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $4,197
Infiltration 1 $0 I $4,280 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $4,280
8.07 Utilities 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0
City and Private Relocations 1 $0 1 $2,605 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2.605
Page 1 of 4
58
Page 1 of 4
58
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ESTIMATE: City of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrtan/Bicycle Bridge
KPFF Prime
Management KPFF Civil KPG Inc. LMN Archttects Landau Associates Grand Total
Structural
Franchise Utility Coordination
Seattle Public Utility Coordination
8.08 Channelization and Signing
Parking Lot Revisions
Roadway Signing
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study
Rechannelization Baker St
8.09 Cost Estimate
30%
60%
90%
Final
8.10 Spedfications
60 Outline
90% Special Provisions
Final Special Provisions
8.11 Plansheets
30%
She Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Utility (3 sheets)
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
QC Review
'60%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
90%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility(3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
100%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sectors (I sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
UUlity(3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
Final Bid Set
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (I sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing 14 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
9.0 Structural EnQneering (KPFF)
9.01 IBesis of Design
9.02 ONO DaejV
1 Deep Foundations
West Abutment
East Abutment
Arch Steel Pipes
Arch Abutment Connections
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Miscellaneous Connections
$0 I
$1,820 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,820
$0 1
$5,314 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,314
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$7,175 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $7,175
$0 1
$196 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $196
$0 1
$6,100 1
$0 1
$0 I
$O
1 $6,100
$0 1
$4,197 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $4,197
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$2,941 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,941
$0 1
$5,030 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $5,030
$0 1
$3,810 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $3,810
$0 1
$3,642 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,642
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
1
1 $0
$0 1
$1,034 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
$1,034
$0 1
$3,993 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,993
$0 1
$3,727 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,727
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
I $0
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $0
$0 1
$3,536 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $3,536
$0 1
$3,277 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,277
$0 1
$2,243 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,243
$0 1
$3,231 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $3,231
$0 1
$4,218 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $4,218
$0 1
$1,856 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $1,856
$0 1
$3,148 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $3,148
$0 1
$5,355 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
I $5,355
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $0
$0 1
$0 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$2,884 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
$2,884
$0 1
$2,755
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,755
$0 1
$2,362 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
I $2,362
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $1,768
$0 1
$4,016 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $4,016
$0 1
$2,026 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,026
$0 1
$3,701 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,701
$0 1
$1,851 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,851
$0 1
$1,768 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 I
$3,536 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,536
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$5,717 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,717
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$2,393 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,393
$0 1
$2,362 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,362
$0 1
$1,246 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,246
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$3,148 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,148
$0 1
$1,639
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $1,639
$0 1
$2,011
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,011
$0 1
$1,851 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,851
$0 I
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $1,768
$0 1
$3,536 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $3,536
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$5,262 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,262
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 I
$0 I
$O 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 I
$507 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $507
$0 1
$507 1
$0 1
$0
$0
1 $507
$0 I
$703 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $703
$0 1
$507 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $507
$0 1
$1,639 1
1
$0 I
$0
I $1,639
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$708 1
$0 1
$0 I
$O
1 $708
$0 1
$1,416 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,416
$0 1
$1,768 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $1,766
$0 1
$408 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $408
$0 1
$1,825 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,825
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$O 1
$O 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$O 1
$401 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $401
$O 1
$310 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $310
$0 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$O 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$O 1
$401 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $401
$O 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$0 1
$401 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $401
$0 1
$349 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $349
$0 1
$530 1
$0
$0 I
$0
1 $530
$0 1
$349 1
$0
$0 1
$0
1 $349
$0 1
$801 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $801
$0 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$0 1
$1060 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,060
$0 1
$0 I
0 1
0 1
$O
1 $0
Subtotal`
1 $879 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $879
1 $0 1
1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
1 $20,056 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
$0
$20,056
1 $10,028 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $10,028
1 $10,028
$0 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
I $10,028
1 $15,921
$0 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $15,921
1 $5,634 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,634
1 $11,269 i
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $11,269
$5,634 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $5,634
Page 2 of 4
59
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ES71MATE: City of Tukwila
TukWlla Urban Center, PedwWarVBicycle Bridge
Deck Superstructure Framing i $7,702 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $7,702
Deck Slab $7,702 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,702
Deck Hand Railing $7,702 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $7,702
Arch Suspension Hangers i $20,056 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $20,056
903 West ADproach Remo Design $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Shaft Foundations $11,269 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
1 $0 I $11,269
Concrete Columns
i $10,028 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028
Structural Earth Walls r $10,028 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028
Steel Superstructure $11,269
Deck Slab 1 $0 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $11,269
$10,028 1 $O 1 $0 I $0 1 $0
I $10,028
Hand Railings i $10,028 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028
9.04 East ApDmach Ramp Design $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0
Shaft Foundations $5,634 1 $0
1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
Concrete Columns i $5,634 $O 1 $0 l $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
Structural Earth Walls 1 $5,634 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
Steel Superstructure $10,028 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Deck Slab $6 I
634 5,634
Hand Railings 1 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
i $5.634 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,
9.05 Miscellaneous Structures 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 I 80 I $0 0
Wayrmding Sign Supports and Foundations $8,167 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $8,167
Utility Protection Structures $10,028 l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $10,028
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls i $8,167 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,167
Lighting Supports and Foundations $8,167 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8.167
906 kntiCIPSted Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count' t58) $0 1 I $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0
General Notes and Abbreviations i $2,404 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2, 404
General Plan and Elevation r $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Horizontal Control Plan $2,946 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5.893
Foundation Layout i $2.404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,4G4
Pile Details $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404
West Abutment Plan and Elevations $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $2,946
West Abutment Details $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404
East Abutment Plan and Elevations $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
East Abutment Details $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $o
Superstructure Layout $2,946 1 $0 1 $2,404
I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Arch Plan and Elevation $2,946 1 $0 1 $O I $0 1 $p 1 $2
Arch Sections (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $4,807
Arch Details (3 Sheets) $8,839 I I 1 $0
Arch Tension Ties $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,839
1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Arch Tension Tie Details $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $O I $2,946
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 l $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $4,807
Deck Framing. Plan $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Deck Sections (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807
Deck Details (2 Sheets) $5,893 i $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $5,893
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets) $8,839 1 $0 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,839
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets) j $5,893 1 $0 $O I $0 1 $0 I $5,893
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
West Approach Plan and Elevation $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
West Approach Superstructure Sections $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 l $0 1 $2,946
West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0
1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
West Approach Deck Sections i $2,946 I $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 I $2,946
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) $5.893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
East Approach Plan and Elevation $2,404 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $2,404
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation $2,404 1 $0 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2404
East Approach Superstructure Sections i $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) l $4,807 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807
East Approach Deck Sections $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $2,404
East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets) i $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
9.07 Deliverables l $0 1 $0
1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0
30% FEE Submittal $0 1 $0 1 $o
1 $0 1 $0 I $0
30% PSE Plan Set i $724 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $724
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs I $2,998 1 $0 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $2,998
30% PSE QA/QC $10,545 1 $0 1 $0
I $0 I $0 1 $10,545
60% PSE Submittal t $0 1 $0 1 $0
60% PSE Plan Set $724 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Specification Outline 1 $0 1 $0 1 1 $0 1
$1,137 1 $0 1 80 1 $0 I $0 1 $1,13,13
7
Updated Quantities and Costs i $2,998 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $2,998
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments r $672 1 $0 I $0 l $O 1 $0 1 $672
60% PSE QA/QC l $10,545 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,545
90% PSE Submittal 1 I 1 I 1
i $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0
90% PSE Plan Set $724 1 $0 1 $0
Draft Specification $6.410 1 1 I $724
1 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,410
Updated Quantities and Costs $3,929 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $3,929
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments i $672 1 $0 I $O 1 1 $0 1 $672
90% PSE QA/QC l $9,201 1 $0 I $0
1 $0 1 $0 l $9,201
Final PSE Submittal 1 I 1 I 1
Final PSE Plan Set 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 $0
i $724 1 $0 I $0 I 1 $0 1 $724
Final Specification 1 $2,223 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,223
Final Ouanbbes and Costs $1,602 1 I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $1,602
Responses to City 90% PSE Comments $207 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $207
Final PSE QA/QC i $6,720 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,720
Reimbursables $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $0 1 $0
Subtotall $469,544 $0' $0 $0 s0
.ar;;E .e:;;: ._.....11„„ w i ...a!$..,_ w _....lp'.a
10.0 Bridge Aesthetics Collaboration (LMN)
10.01 BrldV Structure $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $O I $0
Arch Geometry 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $19,342 1 $0 1 $19,342
Arch Color j $0 1 I $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012
Connections Susp Cables 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012
Connections Bridge Deck $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012
Connections Abutments $0 1 I 1 $1,012 1 $O 1 $1,012
Connections Tied Arch j $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $1,012
I $0 1 $1,012
Page 3 of 4
60
KPFF Prime
Management& K
KPFF CIVII K
KPG Ina L
LMN Architects L
Landau Associates G
Grand Total
»tF: W
Structural
k 76547U3a
EOFW t
,2 k
$21$r, 1:52 Y
,'i8883 A 9
92a?1. )I
$7.8675801
_T S
1
1 ,,,mLilcd�«w pHS ,»ai
Page 3 of 4
60
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ESTIMATE: City of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedesblen/Blcycle Bridge
KPFF Prime
Management KPFF Civil KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Grand Total
Structural
T I SCOPE OF WORK
Connections Lateral Support
1 $O
$0
1 $0 1
$1,012 1
$0
1 $1,012
1002 Approach Ramps
1 $O
I
$0
$0 I
$0 1
$0
1 $0
Column Treatments
1 $0
I
$0
1 $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Superstructure Treatments
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Deck Treatments
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Earthwall Treatments
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Handrail System
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$1,136 I
$0
1 $1,136
10.03 Draft Basis of Design Document
1 $0
I
$0
1 $0 I
$0 I
$0
I $0
10.04 30% Plan Set
1 $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$4,482 1
$0
I $4,482
10.05 30%PSEDebrIef(wlNcIty)
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$1,515 1
$0
1 $1,515
10.06 (Architectural Sheets Design
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
Code Sheet
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$2,292 1
$0
1 $2,292
Elevations
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$4,844 1
$0
1 $4,844
Sections (2 sheets)
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$7,079 1
$0
1 $7,079
Connection Details (2 sheets)
I $0
$0
1 $0 1
$7,079 1
$0
1 $7,079
Lighting Coordination
I $0
i
$0
1 $0 1
$3,129 1
$0
1 $3,129
Approach Sections, East
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$5,054 1
$0
1 $5,054
Approach Secitons, West
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$5,054 1
$0
1 $5,054
Handrail Details
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$5,333 1
$0
1 $5,333
Study Model Development
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$6,568 1
$0
1 $6,568
10.07 Final Basis of Design Document
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$0
$0
1 $0
1008 50% Submittal
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0
$0
I $0
60% Plan Set
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$9,446
$0
I $9,446
Outline Spa.
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$7,104 1
$0
I $7,104
60% PSE Debrief (with city)
I $0
I
$0
I $0 1
$1,955
$0
I $1,955
City Comment Review /Response to 30%
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 1
$4,708
$0
I $4,708
1009 90 %Submrctal
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $0
90% Plan Set
I $0
1
$0
I $0 1
$25,870 1
$0
I $25,870
Draft Specs
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$8,204 1
$0
1 $8,204
90% PSE Debrief (with city)
I $0
I
$0
I $0 1
$1,397 1
$0
I $1,397
City Comment Review /Response to 60%
I $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$5,331 1
$0
I $5,331
10.10 100%Submittal
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
100% Plan Set
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$10,484 1
$0
1 $10,484
Final Specs
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$3,367 1
$0
1 $3,367
City Comment Review /Response to 90%
1 $O
1
$0
1 $0 1
$4,567 1
$0
1 $4,567
Reimbursables
$0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$2,500 1
$0
$2500
Subtotal
$O
$0
80
$167,955
$0
110 Urban Design and Way Finding
11.01 Illumination
I $O
1
$0
1 $42,607 1
$0 1
$0
1 $42,607
11.02 Wayfinding, Furnishings &Signal
I $0
1
$0
1 $13,382 1
$0 1
$0
1 $13,382
11.03 Landscaping and irrigation
I $0
1
$0
1 $27,879 1
$0 1
$0
1 $27,879
11.04 Walkway Selection/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies 1 $0
1
$0
1 $17,217 1
$0 1
$0
1 $17,217
Reimbursableat $0
1
$0
1 $500 1
$0 1
$0
1 $500
Subtotal).. $O
1
$0
1 $101,586 1
$0
$O
?.42
.:o;;:,..�. ,:a�I,S,a ...€;w'�. _,..N 20
12.0 Tvpes. Size, and Location Report (Complete)
$0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
I $0
$0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
Reimbursablesl $0
1
$0
11 1
$0 1
$O
1 $0
Subtotal $0
$0
to
$0 1.
$0
13.0 Sipal Design
13.01 WSDOT Coordination
1
$0
1 $0
1 $8,496 1 $0 1
$0
1 $8,496
13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Highway Design
1
$0
1 $0
1 $21,855 1 $0 1
$0
1 $21,855
13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E Baker Blvd.
1
$0
1 $0
1 $4,283 1 $0 1
$0
1 $4,283
Reimbursables)
$0
1 $0
1 $1,000 1 $0 1
$O
1 $1,000
Subtotal
14.0 RlpHOf -WeY Services
14.01 Legal Description
1
$0
1 $0
1 $1,551 1 $0 I
$0
1 $1,551
14.02 Right -of -Way Plan
1
$0
1 $0
1 $9,776 1 $0 I
$O
1 $9,776
14.03 Title Reports
1
$0
1 $0
1 $10,119 1 $0 I
$O
1 $10,119
Reimbursables)
$0
1 $0
1 $2,000 1 $0 1
$0
1 $2,000
Subtotall
15.0 Dolcstruction Support Services
Page 4 of 4
61
FEE ESMMATE CKyo/TukWla
Tukwlls Urban Center, PedeebhR/84d, Bridge
Senor Des gn Design Prol. P
Principal CAO Techni eian Atlmin MuIU
Manager Engneer Engneer ll I Englneerl I CoortlinaWr
2.5846
Task �COPEOFWORK 65001 WOO I 45001 40001 40.001 35.001 20001 18.001 A-b I Cortr Amo rt t
LO ProleG Msnegamemand Adminisb Din
101 Project Schedule 1 I 24.0 1 1 1 I 24.0 12 V- b 1 496243
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements 1 1 4.0 I 1 1 1 1 12.0 1 1,240.61
1.03 Progress Reports 1 12.0 1 I 1 I I 240 1 3.101.52
1.04 Invoices 1 120 I I I 1 I 240 I 8 3101.52
1.05 Team Maetings(ASSUme 12 meetings& 3 City Workshops)
ConsultantMeetlnRSw /City (Assume 12 meeting) 1 1 240 1 240 I 1 1 6.513.19+
Consultant lmernal i,gs(ASSUme meet 1 I 24.0 I 24.0 I I I 6,513.191
Reimbursables
a ueslgn craxl202 DealRn cntera Final
Too,sss -era BOamary Silr-'K &KPFF
102 I�w_;ep7n� iwevi'Fng r�ia�a
l opographic Mapping Phase 2
303 1 SUrvev lase Henew
Y
4.�7 FieFJ�= v"aLdn wry !adios m
402 cefr_v nepbiuny,s ame ��gs
403 nenew of neporz anJwmmenfs
rxarwnm rlcvl r tswn
5U1 Mee[wlN Agenc
5.02 Establish 100 -year 11i 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance
otii in. Ag'>_ ai u a ryN(ice� ion eui� e
6.02 r�fiau.nst
603 eoeai rrograms eu5
6.04
sel�nwidnmenai �i.e nssessmem
6.05 dioaog"., �ssessmeiK7cFrf
606 Inve'sb'gauon
6
6.08 iNe aho /waterway uelmeavon
6.09 po
nei.
610 m wnsvuction uocunien�s
6.11 IlG
6.12 A'quakip u3nas easemem
7.0 Prole tworkshops
7 01 Internal Team PSE Kick-0A Meeting
]02 rSL Renew &Project Kick -0ff Meeting
7.03 Iled Arch Concept Workshop
Tied Arch AlWrnatves Graphics
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
West Approach
East Approach
705 Final Concept Selecton Workshop
Conn -mn Detail Sketches
Sprf- F n sh Examples
Color Examples
So, M.del Development
Sketch Up OualRy RentlerinRS (6)
7.06 Public Outreach
Graphics
8.0 CMI _t 1
8.01 'Con `AkrltsbopandP rrsd Alt Bel lion
802 aloe prep Bla Dsmolition
803 Horlxalhl and Vertkal LmsoiA
Route Layout
Horizontal ConVO1
Ramp VansRlons
Vemcal Alignment
Vehicular Crossingofirail
Rech,nn,lization Baker St
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction
Sr. Bndlrig end Psi
Terrain Motlel
Typical Section
Colyd with KCFD and I15ACE
8.05 TESL
806 Surl'so wafer
TIR
Site Damage
"Itabon
8.07 U8a8M
Cityand Private Relocations
Franchise Adq Coortlinatien
Seattle Public UVliry Coordination
808 Olannellnpon and SWng
Parking Lot Revisions
Roadway Signing
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Cir Iu Wn Stutly
Rechannelizabon Baker St
809 Coat EAM
30%
6096
90%
Final
8.10 $P llostlom
60960ut1ine
9096 Special Provisions
8.0 1 80
8.0 1 80
8.0 80
I
80 1 8.0
I
I
8.0 1 80
I
I
I
I
8.0 1 80
1 40
1 4.0
80 1
80
160
160 1
1
Subtobl' 0.0 1 48.0 1 48.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 48.0 I 8.D
I$
I$
I$
8
Page 1 of 4
62
'"�IF,xxfi�
x
.E1x.Y�ll�
t
r r
I$
I$
I$
8
Page 1 of 4
62
FEEESRMATE CIycFTukwlla
Tukwll. Urban Cante, Ped.ArmR/Bi%ids Bridge
Page 2 pr 4
63
MulUplie
Phncipal Project
Manager
Senor
Engneer Eng
Des gn
neer II
Design CgDTechnician
Engineer I
Prol
Coortl nator
I Admin
25846
Task SCOPEOFWWK
65001$ WWI 45W I
40.001 40.00I
35.001 20.001 18.00 Relmb
I
C.M tAmount
Final Spe11P n,
I
I
I I
I I
I
B.0 Phmhsats
1
I
I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I
TESG Plans (4 sheets)
1
I
I I
I I
I I
Roadwayseotions(lsheet)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I
I 1
1 I
I I
Drainage(4shests)
1
I
I
I I
I I
8
Uhhty (3 sheets)
1
I
I
I I
I I
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
1
I
I
I I
I I
QC Review
I
I
I
I I
I
I
'6oss
1
I I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheers)
I
I I
I 1
I
TESCPIans(4shee[s)
I
I
I
I 1
I
TESC Detad (1 sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I
Roadway3ecnons(1sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I I
PavingDetail(lSheet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Drainage(4sheets)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
DrainageDetail(lsheet)
I
I
I I
1 I
I I
UL'l,ty (3sheets)
1
I
1 I
I I
Utility Detail (lsneep
i
1
I
I I
I I
Channelizahon and Signing (4 sheets)
t!
I
I I
I I
Channelization Detal(I sheet)
I
I
1 I
I I
QcReview
1
I
I I
I
I
sots
I
I
I I
I 1
I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I
TESCDetell(1Sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Roadwaysections(lsneep
I
I
I
I I
I I
Plan /Profile She.. (3 sheers)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Paving Dined (l sheet)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Drainage(3 She eud
I
i
I I
I
I
Drainage Derail (1 shee0
Utdity(3 sheets)
1
I
I I
I I
I I
unlity Detae(lsheep
1
I
I I
I I
I 1
1
Channelization and Signing (a sheers)
I 1
I I
I I
ChannelizationDetad(Ssheet)
1
I
I I
I
QGReview
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I 1
I I
I IS
1
1
I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheers)
I
1
I
I I
I I
TES' Plans (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I I
TESC Detail (isheet)
I
I
I
I I
1 1
Roadwsysest- (lsneet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Plan /Pr one Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I
I
I 1
I I
Paving Dehnl(l sheep
I
I
I
I 1
I I
Drainage(4 sheers)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
I
I
I I
I I
Utllity(3sheets)
I
I
I
I 1
I I
UtirnDetail(I sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
cnanneliza tion and Signing (4 sheets)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
cnannelizationDetail(isheep
I
I
I I
I I
I I
QC Review
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
FinaIBldSet
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Site Preparabon (4 sheets)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
TES' Plans (4 sheets)
1
1
I I
I I
I I
TESC Det nl (l sheet)
I
I
I I
I I
I 1
Rpadwaysections(ISheet)
j
1
I I
I I
I 1
Plan/Prpfde She.. (3 sheets)
I
1 1
I I
I I
PavingDeteil(Ssheet)
I
I
I 1
I I
I I
D:inage(4sheete)
I
I
I I
1 I
1
Drainage Detail(lshe)
I
I
I
1 I
I
utility (3sneets)
I
I
I
I 1
I
U[Ility Detad(lsheet)
Channeliza[ionand Signing(4sneets)
cnannelizationDetail(lsneep
I
I
I
I I
1 I
QC Review
I
I
I I
Reimbursables
I
I
I
Sub0otN1
0.0 i '0.0
1 0.0 I
I
0.0 I 0.0 1
I
0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 IE
9.0 5trvtdund E!eimSring(KPFF)
901 Baru aC -Igh
1
1 20
I 4.0 I
I I
I 2.0 I
878.76
9.02 Bndp Daslgn
1
I I
I I
I I
Deep Foundations
1
160
I 80.0 I
800 I I
I I
20.056.50
West Abutment
1
80
I 40.0 I
400 I I
I
10,02825
East Abutment
1
8.0
I 40.0 I
40.0 I I
I
10028.25
Nch Steel Pipes
1
160
I 80.0 I
400 I I
I I
15921.14
Arch Abutment Connections
1
80
1 20.0 I
20.0 I I
I I
563443
Arch Tension Ties
I
160
I 400 I
400 I
I i
11,26886
Arch Miscellaneous COnnecdons
I
80
I 200 I
200 I I
I
5,634.43
Deck Superstructure Framing
I
I 80
I 20.0 I
400 I I
I
7,702.11
Deck slab
1
1 8.0
1 20.0 I
400 I I
I I
770211
Deck Hand Railing
I
1 8.0
20.0 I
400 I I
S
7,70211
Arch Suspension Hangers
I
I 160
I 800
80.0 I
1
20,056.50
903 WotAppmach R-p Deai®1
I
I
I
I
I
ShaftFounda[ions
I
I 16.0
I 40.0 I
400 I i
I
S
11,26886
Concrete Columns
I
I 80
I 400
400 I 1
I I
10.028.25
Structural Earth Walls
I
I 80
1 400
400 1 1
I
1002825
Steel SupersrucWm
I
I 160
I 40.0
40.0 I I
I I
11.26886
Deck Slab
I
I 8.0
I 40.0
40.0 I 1
I I
1002825
Hantl Railings
I
I 80
I 400
40.0 I I
1 I
10,028.25
9.04 Ease Appri Ramp Oaelgn
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Shaft FOunda6pns
I
I 80
I 20.0
200 I I
I I
5.634.43
Concrete Columns
I
I 80
1 20.0 1
200 I I
I I
5.634.43
SVUCtural Earth Walls
I
I 8.0
I 200 I
20.0 1 1
I I
563443
teel SUpersVUd..
I
I 8.0
I 40.0 I
40.0 I I
I I
10.02825
Deck Slab
1
I 8.0
1 20.0 I
20.0 I I
I I
5.634.43
Hand Railings
1
I 80
I 200 I
200 I I
I I
5.634.43
9.05 Mbcellensau sm vitae
1
I
I I
I I
I I
Wayfinding Sign SUppoits and FOUndat ions
1
80
I 240 I
400 I I
I I
8.167.34
Jt,lq Protection Stub,
80
I 400 I
400 I I
I I
10.02625
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
80
I 240 I
400 I I
I I
8.16734
Lighting Supports and Foundations
I
I 80
I 240 I
400 I 1
I I
8.16]34
906 Antir/yeted Sind Uhll Plan Shsb(Sheot Count 159)
1
I
I
I I
I I
Gene2lNOtes and Abbrevib-
1
1 20
40 1
1 1
180 1 1
2,403.68
Page 2 pr 4
63
FEEESTIMATE Citycf Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Ceri Padeetrlary/BI yNa Bridge
Teak 3COPEOFMiORK
General Pan and Elevation
11 --tal Carnal Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
Foundation layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan and Elevations
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
East Abutmen[Details
SuPers[mcture Layout
Arch Plan and Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheeta)
Arch Tension Tees
Arch Tension Tee Details
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (23heets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connection Data (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets)
WestADprOaCh Plan antl Elevation
West Approach Fountlat- Plan and Elevafon
WestApproach Superstructure Sections
WestApproach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
WestApproach Deck Sections
WestApproach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
East A P p Plan antl Elevation
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
East Approach Superstructure Sections
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Deck Sections
Eas[Approach Deck Details (2 She
Misce llaneous St,, -ms (2 Sheets)
907
SO%PSESUbmtW
30% PSE Plan Set
Preliminary Estimated Quantties and Costs
30 %%EQA/QC
60%PSESubmabal
60%PSE Plan Set
Specifcaton 0utire
Updated Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments
60 PSE QA/QC
B0% PSE Submftfal
9096 PSE Plan Set
Draft Specification
Updated Q-ties and Costs
Responses t0 City 60% PSE Comments
9096 PSE QA/QC
Flnal PSE SU kttal
Finel PSE Plan Set
Final Specif h-
Final Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 9096 PSE Comments
Final PSE QA/QC
Principal
Project
Senor
Desgn
Design CADTechnicean
Prol.
--in
M"
Engneer Engneer
ll
Engneer)
Coordnatar
65001 WWI 45001
40001 40.001$
35.001
20.001 1800
I 20 I 4.0 I
1 I
240
I 20 I 4o
1 I
240 I
I
I 40 I 80 I
I 1
480 I
I
I 2.0 I 4.0
1 1
180 I
I
I 2.0 I 40
I I
18o I
I
I 2.0 1 40 1
I I
240 I
I
I 20 I 40 I
I I
180 I
I
I 20 I 40 I
I I
240 I
I
I 20 I 40
1 1
180 I
I
I 2.0 I 40
I 1
240 I
I
I 20 40
1 I
240 I
I
I 40 1 80
I 1
360 I
I
1 6.0 I 120
1 1
720 I
I
I 20 I 40
1 I
240 I
I
1 20 1 40
I I
240 I
I
1 40 1 80
I I
360 1
1
1 2.0 1 4.0 I
I I
240 I
I
I 40 I 8.0
I I
360 I
I
I 40 8.0 I
I
480 I
I
I 60 I 120 I
I
720 I
I
I 40 I 8.0 I
1 I
480 I
I
1 40 1 80 I
I I
480 I
I
I 40 1 SO I
I I
480 I
I
I 20 40 I
I 1
240 I
I
I 20 I 40 1
i 1
240 I
I
20 40 I
1 1
240 1
1
I
I 40 I SO I
I
48.0 I
I
I 20 I 40 I
I I
240 I
I
40 I 60 I
1 1
48.0 I
I
20 I 40 I
I I
18.0 I
I
I 20 40 I
1 I
180 I
I
I zo 40 I
I I
1e.o I
I
40 1 8.0 I
1 I
360 I
I
1 20 4.0 I
1 1I
180 I
I
1 40 1 8.0 I
I
360 I
I
1 40 1 80 I
I I I
I I
48.0 1
I
I
I
I I I
I
I 1
I 1
I
80
I
I
I 240 I
I 1
40 I
320 I 240 I
I I I
I I
I I
160 1
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I
8.0
I
I
1 8.o I
I I
4. I
I 24.0 1
1 1
I
40 I
t 1 4.0 I
I 1
40 I
320 I 24.0 I I
I I I
I I
I 1
160
I
I
I
I I I
I I
1 1
1 I
I
8.0 I
I
I
I 1 48.0 I
I I
1
160 I
I 32.0 I
1 I
I
40 I
I 4.0 I
1 1
40 I
240 I 240 I I
1 I 1
I I
1 I
160
I
I
I
I I I
i I
I I
I
80
I
I
I I 12.0 I
1 I
I
16 o I
I I 120 I
I I
40 I
I 1
I I
4.0 I
240 1 80 I
I I
16.0 I
I
I I I I I I I I I
Subtabal l 1120 1 454.0 1 1340.0 1 1040.0 1 0.0 1 1273.0 1 66.0 1 0.0 1
-0 Magebetrotln CallabonNIM(LMN)
1001 Btdga SbveWro
Arch Geometry
Arch Color
Connections Susp Cables
Connections Bridge Deck
Connections Abutments
Connections Tiad Arch
Connections Lateral SU pport
10.02 approach Ram p.
Column Treatments
Superstructure Treatments
Deck Treatments
Eart .11 Treatments
H androil System
10.03 Dreg Basle of Deslgl Document
10.04 30%plan Set
1005 30% PSE DeMIe!(wgh -M
10.06 Nchit lanm Shams /Daslgn
Code Sheet
Elevators
Sections (2 sheets)
Correct- Details (2 aheets)
Lighting Coordination
Approach Sections. East
Approach Secitons. West
Handrail Details
Study Model Development
1007 Flrel Buis of Deeigi Document
1008 60%SubmMM
W% plan Set
Outline Spars
50% PSE Debrief (with city)
Cty Comment Review Response to 30%
3009 9D%Submitm
9096 Plan Set
Draft Spars
9096 PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review Response to 6096
10.10 SOD96SubmMel
100% Plan Set
F- ISpecs
Multiplier
2.5846
Re,ni 1 Cart tAhrount
294644
294644
5892.89'
2403.68
2,403.68
2,94644
2.403.68 I
2,94644'
2.403 56
294644
2,94644
480736
8,839.33
294644
294644,
4 807.36 I
2946.441
4807.361
5892891
8,839.331
5,892.891
5,892.891
5892891
2946441
2946441
2,946.441
5,892.891
2,946.441
5,892.891
2403681
2403661
2403681
4,80736
2,403 68
480736
5892.89,
72369
299814,
30.545171
723.69
1.137.22
?99814
67200
10.545.17
72369
6.409.81
3,92859
67200.
9.201.181
72369
2.22276
1602 45
2 77
6,719.96,
I
8
Page 3 of 4
64
FEEETIMATE CiyofTuk*la
Tukwlle Urban Carrier, Pedsebiary3myde Bldg.
't G�dEI_,I Pro et Seri or I Des I Design I P J Mulbpl
PrinclPel fe gin CAD Technician Admin`
Manager Engneer Engineer 11 Engneerl Coordnator
2.5846
Teak EOF4pfd( 1 65.001 S WM I 45.001 S 40001 40.001 35001E 20.001 1800 Relmb. Cnnberl AmourE
City comment Reyiew /Reaponaa tp 9o%
110 Urban Da l9a and Wav Madna
11.01 Illumination
1102 Wayfnding. FUrnlshinRS &Swat
1103 Landscaping and lrng..n
11.04 Walkway Selection /Packing Lot T-1 Alignment Studies
120 Time. siis. end Lecetlon Report(COmdebi
13.0 Signal Design
13 01 1 WSDOT Ooordnetion
13.02 IPedeatuan signal Across West Valley Highway Design
13.03 ISign.1 MOddications at Andover Park E &Baker El.
C
14.0 1111 of- WeySeMces
14.01 1Legal Description
14.02 IRightot Way Plan
14.03 fide Reports
15.0 Conatrucllonsupamservicee
Sublumli
0.0 1
0.0 1
0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0 1
0.0
1 00
1 0.0
I
I
I
1
I
I I
1
1
I
I
g
Reimbursables
I
V
Subtomll
0.0 I'
0.0 '1
O.O. I
0.0
1 00 1-
0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0
1
I
I
I
I
I I
g
Reimbursables
1
Subbdal�
0.0 I
0.0 1
0.0
0.0 I
0.0
1 0.0.
,ursable.
Subtpblo 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
F I I I I I I 1
Page 4 of 4
65
FEE ESTIMATE Ci9f of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center,'....,, 'Bigdo Bddge
^Y1 k Principal Project Senior Project Design Proj Admin Multiplier C'1
_l- CADTechnician Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Coordinator
2.5846
Task ISCOPEOFWORK 65W I 50001 50.001 42.001 38.001 35001 22001 1800 Rama, I ComroetAmount
naau'x,a ttkr: ee Vous essoes ,t^ttan iatx 1 ah' 1 drltlhrzx at, ia�,..t tax .a�ax Ix kilo a i� x xia vx.'ea,ti: n i�xl[.
l0 Proieot Managemem end AdmIinisbetion
101 Projec[SChedule I I I I I I I I
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements I I I I I I I
1.03 Progress Reports 1 I I I I I I
104 Incas I I I I I I I I
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) I I I I I I I
Consultant Meetings w City (Assume 12 meeting) I I 180 I I I 1 2.326.14+
Consultant Internal Meetings(Awume 12 meeting) I I 240 I I I I 3.101521
Subtotal: 0.0.. 1 42.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
2.0 Design Crdene Occurrent
2101 Design Criteria Draft 1 I 80 I I 240 I 1 80 I 4094.011
202 Design Criteria Final I 1 6.0 I I 16.0 I 1 4.0 I 2.998.141
Reimburaamea LINMENEWONOM I I
Subtotal 0.0 1 18.0 1 0.0 1 40.0 I. 0.0 1 0.0 1 12.0 1 0.0 is I 7.09214 1
a
3.0 TOpcgephic and Boundary Survav (KPG &KPFFdril)
3.01 Topographic Map ping Phase 1 I I 1 I I I I I
302 Topographic Map ping Phase2 1 I I I I 1 I1 l I 1
303 Survey Base Review I 16.0 1 1 160 1 1 80 I I 4,528221
1 I 1� I I III I Ir¢::yl
Subtotal: 0.0 1 16.0 I 0.0 16.0 I 0.0 1 8.0 1 0.0 '1 0.0 1E 4528.22
4.0 Geoteohnlcal Research act Reoommarldatlorm ,mom
401 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing
4 02 Cattechnical Evaluahon. Reporting, and Meetings 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I
4.03 Review of Reportand Comments 1 I 160 1 I I I I 20 I 2.18140
1
1 I
I
I I I I
I 'I)�I'li +'dp {:euiµ':'.
e•. rxn +.lo...:...
Subtotal
Subtotal I 0.0 I
18.0 1
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 2.0
I 0.0 I
2,18140
v,..
„u ,ui39 ,mR,rk,s,4,u 5xm, .um:,wmbmu;�'�silki n,r=,
6.0 Erw in onmemal and Permitting Services (Landau KPFF Qvil)
m. talsi
8.0 Hydroullce(KPFli
601 Team. Agency. and Pre Application Meetings 1
I I I
501 Meetwth Agencies
1 I
160 I
I I I 16.0 I
I
3.51506'
502 Establish 100 year Floodplaln
I I
160 I
1 4.0 I I 16.0 I
1
3,949.27
503 Establish Struct ural Clearance
1 1
80 1
1 I I I 80
1
1.48873
1
I I I
I 1
40.0
1 I
48.0
Subtotal
0.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 1
4.0 1 0.0
32.0
I 8.0 1 0.0 1 8 I
8,953.05
,,emu ='a l "Uii ni ^,";i4:' ,8,u,,:,
„u ,ui39 ,mR,rk,s,4,u 5xm, .um:,wmbmu;�'�silki n,r=,
6.0 Erw in onmemal and Permitting Services (Landau KPFF Qvil)
7.0 Proied Workshops
601 Team. Agency. and Pre Application Meetings 1
I I I
I I
I I
6.02 SERA Checklist I
I 4 C I I
I 160
1 I
1
2,088.36
603 WSDOT Local Programs ECS 1
I 4.0 I I
80 1 I
702 TSL Review& Project Kick-Off Meeting
I
1.385.35
6.04 Phase l Environmental Site Assessment 1
I I I
1 1
I I
I
I 1
605 Biological AssessmenVEFH I
I 4.0 I I
160 1 I
16.0
I 1
3.701.15
6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation I
I I
I I
I I
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphic
607 Shoreline Permit I
1 4.0 I
80 1 1
80
1 1
j$1
2.10903
6.08 Wetland/Waterway Delineation I
I I
I I
704 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
I I
I 8.0 I I
6.09 Cntical Areas Report 1
I 8.0 1
80 I I
16.0
I I
3.34964
610 Mitigator, Onstruction Documents 1
1 I
I I
I I I
1 I
I I
611 IARPA I
I 4.0 I
I I
80
I 1
1.240.61
6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement I
1 I I
I 1
I 1
1 1
I I
Reimbursables
7.05 Fi nal Concept Selection Workshop
Page 1 of 4
66
Subtotal)
0.0 1 2S.0 1 0.0 1
40.0
I 16.0 1
48.0
1 0.0 1 0.0
1
Y
13.874.13
V, r�adan'l A, a,,,,, a:, m;'p, ,,,,,:t
a.y. him
u a
v a,. a,
7.0 Proied Workshops
701 Internal Teem PSI Ki11-011 Meeting
1
1 8.0 I I
1 I
I I
1,03384
702 TSL Review& Project Kick-Off Meeting
1
I 8.0 I I
I I
I I
1.03384
703 Tied Arch Concept Workshop
I
1 8.0 I
I I
I I
1,03384
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphic
I
I 1 1
I I
I 1
704 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
I
I 8.0 I I
I I
I I
1.03384
West Approach
I
I I I
I I
I I
East Approach
I
I I I
I 1
I I
7.05 Fi nal Concept Selection Workshop
I
I 80 I I
I I
I I
1,033.84 1
on
Cnect ion Detail Sketches
I
I I I
I I
I I
1
Surface Finish Examples
I
I I I
I I
I I
I
Color Examples
Studv Model Development
I
I I I
I I
I I
Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6)
1
I I I
I
I I
706 Public Duties on
1
I 8.0 I I
I I
I I
103384
Graphics
1
I I
I I
I I
Reimbursable s
8ubtomlY
0.0 I 48.0 1 0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0 I
0.0
I 0.0 1 0.0
I S
6,20304
8.0 CMI Erl1direi
801 Concept Workshop and Prefertetl A&Seloodon
1
1 16.0 1
160
I 1
160
1 40 I
I
5479.351
802 Site Prep and Demolition
I
I 80 I I
160
I 160 1
I I
1
4342131
8 03 Horizontal and Vartkel Layout
I
I I I
I
I I
1.
I
Route Layout
I
1 8O I 1
80
1
I I
1
1,902271
Horizontal Control
I
1 4.0 I 1
80
1 I
I I
1,385.351
Ramp transitions
1
1 8.0 I I
1 160 1
I 1
2.605.281
Vertical Ahgnment
I
I 8.0 I
40
1 40 I
I I
,.6
Vehicular Crossing of Tre it
I
1 8.0 I
80
1 80 1
I I
2,687.981
Rechannelizatien Baker St
I
I 160 1
16.0
1 80 1
160
1 1
6037631
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction
I
1 160 1 1
160
1 16.0 1
160
I I
6,823.341
804 Smiling and Paving
I
I I 1
I I
I I
Terrain Model
I
1 40 1 1
80
I 16.0 I
I 1
2.956.78
Typical Section
I
I 80 1 1
I 8.0
I 1
1,819.56
Cc rd with KCFD and USACE
I
I 16.0 I 1
I 2 0 I
80
I 1
2.98780
805 RSC
1
I 16.0 I I
I 320 I
I
5,210.55
806 8urroce Water
1
I I I
I
I I
T
1
40 1 16.0 1 I
320
I
160
160 I
8,570 53,
Site Drainage
I
I 160 1 1
16.0
I 411
I 1
4,197.391
Infiltration
1
I 80 1 1
16.0
1 80 1
8.0
I I
4.280.10'
807 Uli
I I I
I
1 1
City and Pnvate Relocations
M
I 80 I
I 16.0
I I
2.605.28
Franchise Utility Coordination
I
I 8.0 1 I
I 80 I
1 I
1.81956,
Page 1 of 4
66
FEEESTIMATE Cibeff kxlle
Tukwila Urban Center, PedeeVian/Bi yc a Bridge
4 IE11gfUli rRJ
Senior
Pro)ect
Design
P", j
Multlplle
Y.
Princi pal
pal
Manager Engineer
Engineer
CAD
Engineer
Techn cian
Coordinator
Admin
k ti
25846
Teak �PEOF WORK
6500 5000 5000
1 I
4200 3800
1 1 1
3500 1
22001 1800
Reimb
Coma ctAmount
Seattle Public Utility Coordination
1
1 160 I
1 16.0 1
16.0 I
4.0 I
531394
808 Cie mellutlon and signing
I
I I
1
1 1
I
I
ParkingLetRevisions
1
1 160 1
I 160
1 32.0 1
4.0 1
7,174.85
Roadway Signing
I
1 1
I
1 2.0 1
1
19643
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study 1
1 16.0 1
I 160
1 160 I
80 I
1
609966
Rechannelization Baker St
I 8.0 I
I 8.0
160 I
80 I
4,19739
809 cox Ea6meta
I I
I
I
I
30%
1 20
1 8.0 1
1
1 160 1
1
1
2.94127
60%
I 20
I 120 1
1
1 320 1
I
1
5.029.631
90%
I 20
1 8.0 I
1 8.0
1 160 1
I
380970
Final
I 1.0
I 8.0 I
8.0
I 160 I
I
I
3,641.70
s So $pedfleatrons
I
I I
I I
I
60 %0u1
I
I 8.0 I
I
I I
I
I
1033.84
90% Special Provisions
I 10
1 160 I
1 120
1
80 1
399321
Final Special Provisions
1 2.0
I 16.0 I
I 8.0
1
8.0 I
3.72699
811 Plin heels
1
I I
I
1
I
30%
1
I I
I
I
I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
1
I 4.0 I
1
I 16.0 1
16.0 1
1
3.535.73
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
I
1 20 1
1
I 160 1
16.0 I
I
3,277.27
Roadway Secuons(1 sheet)
1
1 4.0 1
1 2.0
1 8.0 1
80 1
1
2,243.43
ee
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 shts)
I
I 1.0 1
1 80
1 80 1
160 1
1
3,23075
Drainage (4 sheets)
1
1 8.0 1
1 16.0
1 1
160 1
1
4,21807
Urnity (3 sheets)
I
I 1.0 1
1 2.0
1 8.0 1
so 1
1
1,85534
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
I
1 1.0 1
1
1 160 1
16.0 1
1
3,14804
QC Review
I 8.0
I 160 1 8.0
I I
160 I
535529
I I
I
1
'60%
1
I 1 I
I I
I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
1 2.0 1 1
1 120 1
160 1
1
2.88441
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
1
1 10 I
120 1
160
i
2.755.18
TESC Detail U. sheet)
I
1 10 I
8.0 1
16.0 1
I
2.362.32
Roadway Sections (I sheet)
1
1 2.0 1 1
80 1
80 1
1
1.767.87
Plan /Profile Shaets(3 sheets)
1
1 1.0 1 I
8.0
16.0 I
160 I
1
401647
Paving D-I(I sheet)
I
I 4.0 1 1
1 80 1
80 I
1
2.026.33
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
I 4.0 1 1
160
1 1
160 1
1
3.701.15
Drainage octal (I sheet)
I
1 20 1 1
8.0
I 1
80 I
I
185057
ULhty(3 sheets)
I
1 2.0 1 1
1 80 1
80
I
1,767.87
Utility octal (I sheet)
I
I 20 1 1
1 8.0 1
so
1
1.76787
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
I
I 40 I I
1 16.0 1
160
1
1 3,53573
Channelization Detail D. sheet)
I 1.0 I
I 8.0 I
80
I
1638.64
QC Review
I 4.0
1 16.0 1 160 1
1
16.0 1
It 5.717.14
I I
I
I
90%
I
I
I 1
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
1 10 I
120 1
120
1
239334
TESC Plane (4 sheets)
1
1 10 I
8.0 1
16.0
1
2.36232
TESC octal (1 sheet)
I
I 10 I
40 1
80 I
1
1.24578
Roadway Section, (I sheet)
I
1 1.0 1 1
80 I
80 I
1.638.64
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
1
1 1.0 I 1
16.0 1
16.0 1
1
3.14804
Paving Detail D. Sheet)
1
1 1.0 I 1
I 80 I
80 I
I
1,638.641
Drainage (3 sheets)
I
1 30 1 1
4.0
1 1
160 1
1
2.010821
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
1
I 2.0 1 1
80
1 1
80 I
I
1.850.57 1
Utility (3 sheets)
I
1 2.0 1 I
1 8.0 1
80 I
I
1.767.87
Utility Detail (I sheet)
1
1 20 1 1
1 80 I
80
1
176787
Channelnabon and Sig rnng(4 sheets)
I
I 4.0 1 1
1 16.0 1
160 1
1
3,53573
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
I
I 10 1
I 80 I
80
1
1,638.64
QC Review
1 40
1 16.0 16.0
I
80 1
5.262.25
I I I
I I
I
I
100%
I
I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4sheets)
I
I 10 I
20 I
20
I
50658
TESC Plane (4 sheets)
1
1 1.0 1 I
2.0 1
20 I
1
506.58
TESC Detail (I sheet)
I
I 10 I I
40 I
2.0 I
II
70301
Roadway Sections(1 sheet)
1
1 1.0 I I
2.0 1
20 1
1
506.58
Plan /Profile Sheet, (3 sheets)
I
I 30 I I
1 80 1
8.0 1
1
1.638.64
Paving Detail U. sheet)
1
1 1.0 I I
1 8.0 1
8.0 1
1
1.63864
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
1 1.0 I I
20
I I
40 I
I
708.18
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
1
1 2.0 1 1
4.0
1 1
80 1
1
1,416.36
Utility (3 sheets)
1
1 20 I I
I a0 I
80 I
I
1.76787
Utility Detail (I sheet)
1
i 2.0 1 1
1 8.0
80 1
1
1.76787
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
I
I 2.0 I I
I 8.0 I
80 I
I
1,76787
Channelization Detail D. sheet)
I
1 1.0 1 1
1 10 I
20 1
1
40837
QC Review
I 20
1 80 I 1
1 1
80 1
182473
I I
I I
I
Final Bid Set
I
I I I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
1 1.0 I I
I 1
30 1
I
400611
TESC Pier (4 sheets)
1
1 1.0 I
I 1
20 1
I
310.15
TESC Detail U. sheet)
I
I 1.0 I I
I 1
10 1
1
21969
Roadway Secuons(l sheet)
1
1 1.0 I
I 1
10
1
219.69
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I to I
I 1
30
1
40061
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
I
1 10
I 1
10 I
1
219.69.
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
1 SO
I I
30
I
400.611
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
I
1 2.0
I I
10 I
I
348.92
Utility (3 sheets)
1
1 20 I I
1 1
30 1
1
529.84
Unity Detail(: Sheet)
I
1 2.0 I I
I I
1.0 I
I
34892
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
I
1 20 I I
I I
6.0 I
1
801.23
Channelization Detail (I sheet)
1
1 30 1 1
1 I
1.0 1
1
21969
QC Review
I 2.0
I I I
1 I
80 1
1
1,05969
Reimbursables
1
1
Subtotal: 34.0
477.0 I 40.0 1
31$.0
I 647.0 I
580.0 I
920 I 0.0 4a
228,28738
{I.=.=ft i 5.. H
9.0 structural EriglmerlM(KPFF)
901 BaabafDmign
I
I I I
I I
1
1
I
902 Bridge Desk
I
I I I
I I
I
I
Deep Foundations
I
I I I
1 I
I
westAbutment
I
I I
I I
I
East Abutment
I
I I
I I
I
I
Arch Steel Pipes
I
I I
I I
I
I
Arch AbutmentConneciona
I
I
I I
I
Arch Tension Ties
I
I I
I I
I
Arch Miscellaneous Connections
I
I I
I I
I
DecksuperatrunureFraming
I
I I
I I
I
Deck Slab
I
I I
I
I
I
Dec< Railing
1
I I
I I
I
I
I
Arch Suspension Hangers
I I I
I I
I
I
1
903 WmtApproech RampDmigp
I
I I I
I I
1
I
Page 2 of 4
67
FEEESTIMATE Cltyof1rukwile
Tukwila Urban Center. PeEestrlaryBicycle Saki
a Project Senor Project Des Prof. in
I Multip liar t
Princpal CADTechncan Atlm ff
Manager Engineer Engineer Engi Coo duator
Tank SOOPEOFWORK
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
904 E.ApproeM Ramp Dmir
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
SteelSuperstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
905 MlxellanemsSWtSurm
WayFndng5gn Supports and Foundations
Utility Protection Structures
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
Lighting Supports and Foundations
9C6 NNdpatea Structural Plan Sheeta(SheatCount t58)
General Notes and Abbreviations
General Plan and Elevation
Horizontal Control Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
FoundaUOn Layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan antl Elevations
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
East Abutment Details
Superstructure Layout
Arch Plan and Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Tension Tie Details
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation 12 Sheets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connector Details (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
Deck Vert cal Support Sect ors (2 Sheets)
Deck Vert cal Support Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Plan and Elevation
Wast Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
West Approach Superstructure Sect ors
West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Deck Sections
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Plan and Elevat on
East Approach Found at on Plan and Elevation
East Approach Superstructure Sections
East Approach Superstructure Detals(2 Sheets)
East Approach Deck Se Mons
East Approach Deck DeIa Is (2 Sheats)
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
907 Mkhmebka
3D%PSESubmittal
30 %PSE Plan Set
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs
30% PSE QA/QC
60% PSE Submittal
60 %PSE Plan Set
Spa af t Outline
Updated Quantities and Casts
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments
60% PSE QA/QC
g0%PSESubmittal
90% PSE Plan Set
Dr.ft5p.c,f,cat,cn
Updated Quanttes and Costs
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments
90% PSE QA /QC
Anal PSE Submittal
F nal PSE Plan Set
Final Specification
Final Quantities and Costs
Rest City 90% PSE Comments
Final PSE QA/QC
1001 Brklae3bucturo
Arch Geometry
Arch Color
Connections -SUSp Cables
Gann on entlge Deck
Connections Abutments
Connections -Tied Arch
Connections Lateral Support
10.02 Approach Rempe
Column Treatments
Superstructure Treatments
Deck Treatments
Fend —,l Treatments
Handrail System
10.03 Draft Bei of De i Document
10.04 3D% plan Set
10.05 30% PSE Set
10 CiM
65.001 50001
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
50001$
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
42001$ 38001$
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
I I
I t
I I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
35001$
2.5846
22001 18.00 Reimb Contact Am unt
Subtotal( 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 '1 0.0 I. 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 IY
Page 3 of 4
M.;
(I
a
�Ml
JIrA
i
H
t
1�
J
a
�1
FNL,
H
t
�Aa
tilt
rl
t
5
Subtotal( 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 '1 0.0 I. 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 IY
Page 3 of 4
M.;
FEEESTIMATE Cttyof Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedesbier/Blcycle Bridge
Teak 50OPEOFWORK
1006 ArchEactuml Sheab /Design
Code Sheet
Elevations
Sections (2 sheets)
Connection Details (2 sheets)
Lighting Coordination
Approach Sections, East
Approach Secitons, West
Handrail Details
Study Model Development
10.07 Final Besb of Design Document
10.08 60%Submittal
60% Plan Set
Outline Specs
60 %PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review Response to 30%
10.09 90%Submmal
90% Plan Set
Draft Specs
90% PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comm ent Review /Response to 60%
10.10 100%Submiflal
100% Plan Set
Final Specs
City Comment Review /Response to 90%
1 I I I I I I I
Subtotal' 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0
u.o Urban Design and We Finding!
1101 Illumination 1 I I I I I I
11.02 Wayfinding, Fur nisrings &Signal 1 I I I I I 1 I
1103 Landscaping and Irrigation I I I I I I
11.04 Walkway Select ion /Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies I I I I I I I
Page 4 of 4
69
Subtotal)
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
I 0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0
1 E
'°.,.�._r- ���3
12.0 Types, Sl[e,eM Lautlan Report (Complete)
t
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
I
Reimbursables
1
Subtotal I
0.0 1 O.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0
I 0.0 I
OA
I 0.0
lE
..3ti Ana
13.0 Siptel 020
1301 WSDOT Coordination
r
1 I I I
I
I
1302 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Highway Design
1
I I I
1
I
1303 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E &Baker Blvd,
1
I I I I
I
I
Reimbursables
I
I I I I
Subtatall
00 1 00 00 I 0.0 i. 0.0_..
1 0.0 1
0.0
1. 0.0
mm P ..�yy».
14.0 Rlghtcf ...Z ea
1401 Legal Description
1402 Right of -Way Plan
1
I I I I
I I I I
I
I I
I
I
1
1403 Title Reports
1
I I I 1
I I
I
Reimbursables
I
I
1
Subtotal'.
0770 1 0.0 I 0.0 I OA
1 0:0 1
0.0.
I 0.0
Page 4 of 4
69
FEEES71MATE City oTTukwila
Tukwila Urban Comer, Padestrian/Bloyde Bridge
LU+G' Seri or Project Designer CAD Survey Office Multipl
UD /LA Sury I LA/Survey l Technician) Crew Admin 2881745
Task ISCOPEOFWORK «M. 64.901 56.561 40.131 31.251 47.661 23.08 Reimb I ComractAmoum
1.0 Prolact Management and AdrMnlstration
1.01 Project Schedule
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements
1.03 Progress Reports
1.04 Invoices
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops)
Consultant Meetings w/ City (Assume 12 meeting)
Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meeting)
I I I I I
I I I I I I S
I I I I I I
I I I I I I M
1 450 I I 1 45.0 I I
I I I I I I
I I I I
iursables 250.00
1 45.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 13
Subtotail 45.0 I 0.0 I O.0 ETI
12,468.59
25000
2.0 Do" Critede Doeumem
2.01 Design Criteria Draft
2.02 Design Criteria Final
Reimbursables
1 I
I I
I
B btotal: 0
00 0
00 I 0
00 I
I UO I
I 00 4 0
00 1�
3.0 To oh1. and BoundarvSurvey IKPG &KPFF CIvin
3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase l 1
1 1
1 4
4.0 1 6
6.0 I
I 50.0 I
I 90.0 I
1
18,209.52
3.02 Topographic Mapping Phase 2 1
1 1
1 2
2.0 1 3
3.0 1
1 30.0 1
1 48.0 I
9
9,967.06
3.03 Survey Base Review 1
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
Reimbursables
3
3,500.00 3
3,500.00
Subtotal! 0
I I
I
9.0 I
I 80.0 I
I 195.0 I O
O.0 t S
3.500.00 3
31,676.58
4.0 G sobs hnlul Rasaarcii and Recommendatioas
4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing
4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation, Reporting and Meetings
4.03 Review of Report and Comments
Reimbursables
Subtotal1 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 I
I
I 0.0 0
0.0 S
m w:wdrx.xm
5.0 HvdrauII.1KPFFCivin
5.01 Meetwith Agencies
5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplaln
5.03 Establish Structural Clearance
Reimbursables
1 I
I
Y
Subtotal O
O.O I O
O.O I O
O.O 1
1
0.0 I
I 0.0 I 0
0.0 S
8.0 Environmemal and Permitting Services (Landau KPFF Cltd9
6.01 Team, Agency, and Pre Application Meetings
6.02 SEPA Checklist
6.03 WSDOT Local Programs ECS
6.04 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
6.05 Biological Assessment/EFH
6.06 Cuhural Resources Investigation
6.07 Shoreline Permit
6.08 Wetland/Waterway Delineation
6.09 Critical Areas Report
6.10 Mitigation Construction Documents
6.11 IARPA
6.12 4quatic Lands Easement
Reimbursables
I I
0.0 I 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 I
I I
I
0.0 Is
�6
7.0 ProlectWorkshope
7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick-Off Meeting I
I 4
4.0 1 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I
1
1,210.68
7.02 TSL Review& Project Kick Of Meeting 1
1 4
4.0 I 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I
1
1,210.68
7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop I
I 4
40 I I
I I
I I
I
748.10
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop I
I 4
4.0 I 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I
1,210.68
West Approach
EastApproach
7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop
4
4.0 1 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I I
1,210.681
Connection Detail Sketches
Surface Finish Examples
Color Examples
Study Model Development
Sketch Up Quality Renderings I6)
Y
7.06 Public Outreach 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
I I
I I Y
Y
Graphics I
I I
I I
I 1
1 I
I
Reimbursables
I I I
Subtotall 20.0 1 0.0 1 SB.o
8.01 Concept Workshop and Profensd Alt Selection
8.02 Site Prep and Demolition
8.03 Hodzamal and Vertical layout
Route Layout
Horizontal Control
Ramp transitions
Vertical Alignment
Vehicular Crossing of Trail
Rechannelization Baker St
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction
8.04 Grading and Paving
Terrain Model
Typical Section
Coord with KCFD and USACE
8.05 T6RC
8.06 Surface Water
TIP
Page 1 of 4
70
PEE ESTIMATE city of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Carter, Pedeetrlart/Bloyde Bridge
60% I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan/Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet) 1
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review 1
90%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1
Paving Detail (1 Sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets) 1
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets) 1
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review I
100%
Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1
QC Review
Final Bid Set I I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I 1 I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I
TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) 1 I I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I I I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I I I I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I I I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
QC Review I I I I I
Survey Office Multiplier
I
Crew I Admin 2881145
47.66 I 23.08 Reimb I CorltractAmoum
s
S
5
S
S
S
Y
S
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
Y
Y
3
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Y I I I I I
Subtotal1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is
0W.":
9.0 Stnactural Engbeedng(KPFF)
901 Saab or Daalgrl 1 I I I 1 I
9.02 Bridge Design 1 I I I I I
Deep Foundations I I I I I I
Page 2 of 4
71
Senor Project Designer CAD
Sury LA/Survey ITachriciarl
Task SCOPE OF WORK
64.901 56.56 I 40,131 31,251
Site Drainage 1
I I I I
Infiltration I
I I I I
8.07 UBlmea I
I I I I
City and Private Relocations I
I I I I
Franchise Utility Coordination
Seattle Public Utility Coordination
I I 1 I
8.08 Channelzation and Signing 1
I I I I
Parking Lot Revisions I
I I I I
Roadway Signing I
I I I I
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study I
I I I I
Rechannelization Baker St I
I I I I
809 Cost Estimate
30% I
I I I
60% I
I I I I
90% I
I I I I
Final I
I I I I
8.10 Spedlicati.. I
I 1 I 1
60% Outline I
I I I I
90% Special Provisions I
I I I I
Final Special Provisions I
I I I I
8.11 Pianaheft I
I I I I
30% I
I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I
I I I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I I I 1
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I
I I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) I
I I I 1
QC Review I
I I I I
60% I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan/Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet) 1
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review 1
90%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1
Paving Detail (1 Sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets) 1
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets) 1
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review I
100%
Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1
QC Review
Final Bid Set I I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I 1 I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I
TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) 1 I I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I I I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I I I I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I I I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
QC Review I I I I I
Survey Office Multiplier
I
Crew I Admin 2881145
47.66 I 23.08 Reimb I CorltractAmoum
s
S
5
S
S
S
Y
S
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
Y
Y
3
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Y I I I I I
Subtotal1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is
0W.":
9.0 Stnactural Engbeedng(KPFF)
901 Saab or Daalgrl 1 I I I 1 I
9.02 Bridge Design 1 I I I I I
Deep Foundations I I I I I I
Page 2 of 4
71
FEE ESTIMATE CWq of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center. Pedesttan/BW1 Bridge
KPB W Sen or I Project I Designer I CAD
UD /LA Su, LA/Survey Technician
Tesk SCOPE OF WORK 64.901$ 56.56 I 40.13 I 31.25
9.03
9.04
9.05
9.06
9.07
West Abutment
East Abutment
Arch Steel Pipes
Arch Abutment Connections
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Miscellaneous Connections
Deck Superstructure Framing
Deck Slab
Deck Hand Railing
Arch Suspension Hangers
WwtAppro nsh Ramp Design
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
East Approach Ramp Design
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
Miacellanaow Structures
Way6nding Sign Supports and Foundations
Utility Protection Structures
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
Lighting Supports and Foundations
Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count 358)
General Notes and Abbreviations
General Plan and Elevation
Horizontal Control Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
Foundation Layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan and Elevations
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
East Abutment Details
Superstructure Layout
Arch Plan and Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Tension Tie Details
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Plan and Elevation
West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
West Approach Superstructure Sections
west Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Deck Sections
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Plan and Elevation
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
East approach Superstructure Sections
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Deck Sections
East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
3096 PSE Submittal
30% PSE Plan Set
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs
30% PSE QA/QC
SO%PSESubmitral
60 %PSE Plan Set
Specification Outline
Updated Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments
60% PSE QA/QC
90%PSESubmitral
90% PSE Plan Set
Draft Specification
Updated Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments
90% PSE QA/QC
Final PSE Submittal
Final PSE Plan Set
Final Specification
Final Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 90% PSE Comments
Final PSE QA/QC
10.0
(LMNQ
Subtotal 0.0
Survey I Office
Crew Admin
47,661 23.08
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Multiplier'
2881745
Reimb. ComradAmount
S
Y
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
g
S
S
a
Y
1
S
S
S
Y
S
S
S
S
Y
S
S
1
1
S
)g
Page 3 of 4
72
FEEESTIMATE C4of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedeetrian/Bkyde Bridge
Tesk SCOPE OF WORK
30 11 Bridge Structure
Arch Geometry
Arch Color
Connections Susp Cables
Connections Bridge Deck
Connections Abutments
Connections Tied Arch
Connections Lateral Support
10.02 Approach Ram.
Column Treatments
Superstructure Treatments
Deck Treatments
Earthwall Treatments
Handrail System
1003 Draft Besla of Design Document
10.04 3096PI,ISH
10.05 SM PSE Debrief (with ii"
10.06 krohkectural Shaft Design
Code Sheet
Elevation.
Sections (2 sheets)
Connection Details (2 sheets)
Lighting Coordination
Approach Sections, East
Approach Secions, West
Handrail Details
Study Model Development
10.07 Final Bunt r# DpIgI Da.msm
10.08 80%Submittal
60% Plan Set
Outline Specs
60 %PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review Response to 30%
10.09 W%SubmW.1
90% Plan Set
Draft Space
90 %PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review/ Response to 60%
10.10 100%Submidal
100% Plan Set
Final Specs
City Comment Review Response to 90%
Senior
UD /LA
64.90
Project Designer CAD urve
Sy Office
Sury I LA/Survey I Technician I Crew Admin
56.56 I 40.131 31.25 I 47.661 23.08
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I 1
I 1 I I
I i I I
I 1 I I
I I I I
I I 1 I
1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
i I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I 1
I 1 I I
I I I I
1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
Multiplier
2.881745
Reimb.
Conineaknount
Y
S
S
S
S
5
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
S
S
S
Y
Y
S
Y
1
S
1
Y
S
14.0 R YOItof-W.YServices
14.01 Legal Description
14.02 Rightof-Way Plan
14.03 Title Reports
Subtotal I 22.0 1 68.0 1 112.0 1 72.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I
I 1 1,550.72
1 1 32.0 1 20.0 1 9,776.32
8.0 36.0
1 70 1 260 1 12.0 1 26.0 I 10,118.73
Page 4 of 4
73
I I 1 I I
Subtotal: 0.0 I 16.0 1 74.0 1 44.0 1, 46.0 I 0.0 1 2.000.00 1 23.445.77
Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0
1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
1 0.0 IS
.m�i��wi'�.
I
I
11.0 Urban Design and Way Finding
I
Reimbursable.
11.01 Illumination
1 40.0 1
I 148.0 1 200.0 I
I
42,607.29 J
11.02 Wayfinding Furnishings &Signal
1 16.0 1
1 400 1 64.0 1
1
13,381.67
11.03 Landscaping and Irrigation
1 30.0 1
1 960 1 124.0 1
1
27.879.38
11.04 Walkway Selection/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
24.0 I
I 54.0 1 72.0 1
1
s
17,217.33
Reimbursables
20.0 I
S
500.00
500.00
1 14.0 1
I
Subtotal 110.0 1 0.0
I
1 338.0 1 480.0 1 0.0
I 0.0 1
500.001
101.585.68
14.0 R YOItof-W.YServices
14.01 Legal Description
14.02 Rightof-Way Plan
14.03 Title Reports
Subtotal I 22.0 1 68.0 1 112.0 1 72.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I
I 1 1,550.72
1 1 32.0 1 20.0 1 9,776.32
8.0 36.0
1 70 1 260 1 12.0 1 26.0 I 10,118.73
Page 4 of 4
73
I I 1 I I
Subtotal: 0.0 I 16.0 1 74.0 1 44.0 1, 46.0 I 0.0 1 2.000.00 1 23.445.77
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reimbursable.
I
Subtotal t 0.0 1
1
0.0 I
0.0 I
O.0 I
0.0 1 0.0 1 i
9a:<fl ,.�,..e
,,,w, I. :d.,.t,.- .,.Ira; a:3a n
13.0 SI®ta1 Dea
13.01 WSDOT Coordination
I 6.0 I
20.0 1
20.0 I
20.0 I
I
8.495.961
13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Hifhwav Design
1 14.0 1
42.0 1
76.0 1
40.0 1
I s
21,855.15
13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E Baker Blvd.
1 2.0 1
6.0 1
16.0 1
12.0 I
4.282.96
14.0 R YOItof-W.YServices
14.01 Legal Description
14.02 Rightof-Way Plan
14.03 Title Reports
Subtotal I 22.0 1 68.0 1 112.0 1 72.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I
I 1 1,550.72
1 1 32.0 1 20.0 1 9,776.32
8.0 36.0
1 70 1 260 1 12.0 1 26.0 I 10,118.73
Page 4 of 4
73
I I 1 I I
Subtotal: 0.0 I 16.0 1 74.0 1 44.0 1, 46.0 I 0.0 1 2.000.00 1 23.445.77
FEEESMMATE CRyof Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, PadesVlan/Blcycle Bridge
j.&A�iAfoCb I
Palmer M
I Projec I Project I Project
Intern Admin S
Specs QA /QC
Multiplier
Teak SCOPE OF WORK
I
I
I
I ContraatAmount
72.84 I
39 42 I
44.23 I
34.86 I
Reimb. I
v:
O
1.0 Proles Menatemem and P_. 1.1
1.01 Project Schedule 1 2
20 1 8
8.0 1 I I
I 1 1.0 I I
1
1,513.59
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements I I
I I
I I I
I I I I
1.03 Progress Reports 1
1 1
12.0 1 I I
I I 120 I 1
2
2,202.11
1.04 Invoices 1 1
1 1
12.0 I I I
I I 12.0 1 1
2
2,202.11
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) 1 1
18.0 1 1
18.0 1 18.0 1 1
18.0 1 9.0 1 I I
1
11,534.66
Consultant Meetings W/ City (Assume 12 meeting 1 I
I I
I I I
I 1 I 1
Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meeting I
I 1
1 I
I 1 1
Reimbursables
Subtotal 2
20.0 I 5
50.0 i 18.0 I 1
18.0 I 8.0 I 25.0. I 0.0 I 0.0. 1 1
1 1
17,452.46
2.0 Deei®t Criteria DocumetK
2.01 Design Criteria Draft I I
I 1
1 I I
I I I I
2.02 Design Criteria Final I
I I
I 1 1
1 I I
Reimbursables
I I
Subtotal 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 1 0.0 I 0
I I
Page 1 of4
74
FEEESTIMATE Cltyaf Tukwila
Tukwlla Urban Center, PedestriaryBicycla Bridge
P
Project
Project Prgec[
Partner I
Manager
Designer Architect
I Intern I Admin I Specs I QA /QC
Task SOOPEOF WOW
I
I I I I
72.84 39.42
44.23 34.86
23.56 18.75 39.42 38.42
TiR I
I I I
I I
I I
Site Drainage I
I I I
I
I I
Infiltration I
I I I I
I
I I
807 UUUb. I
I I I I
I I I
City and Private Relocations I
I I I I
I I I
Franchise Utility Coordination 1
I I I I
I I I
Seattle Public Utility Coordination I
I 1 I I
I I I
808 ChannNltabon and Signing
Parking Lot Revisions I
I I I I
I I I
F Roadway Signing I
I I I I
I I I
F Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study I
I I I I
I 1 I
f Rechannelization Baker St I
I I 1 I
I I 1
8.09 Cox EeUmata I
I I I I
I I I
30% I
I I I I
I I I
60% I
I I I I
I I I
90% I
I 1 I
I I I
Final 1
I I I
I I I
8.10 Bpecmaadona I
I I I I
I I I
60% Outline I
I I I I
I I I
90% Special Provisions
Final Special Provisions I
I I I I
I I I
a.11 Planheeta I
I I I I
I I I
30% I
I I I I
I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I
I I I
I I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I I 1 1
I I I
Roadway Sections() sheet) I
I I I
1 I 1
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
QC Review 1
I I I I
I I I
1
'60% I
I I I I
I I I I
i I I
I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I 1 I I
I I I
TESC Detail (I sheet) I
I I I I
I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I
I I 1 I
I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I
I 1 I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I
I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I 1 I I
I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
I I I
QC Review I
I I I I
I I I
90% I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1
I I I I
I I I
TESC Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I 1
I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
I I 1
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I I I 1
I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
QC Review
I
100 I
I I 1 I
I I 1 I
I I I I
I 1 I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
TESC Detail (I sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
1 I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I 1
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I I
QC Review I
I I I I
I I I I
I
Final Bid Set I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1
I I I I
I I I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
1 I I 1
I I I I
TESC Detail (I sheet) I
I I I I
I I I 1
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1
I I I
I I I 1
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I Y
Drainage (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I L
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
I I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I 1
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I Y
QC Review I
I I I
I I I
Reimbursables
Subtotal)
1 I
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1
I I 1
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 i
ol 1111,11z
9.02
Multiplier 't
3 154
Reimb. I ContractAmount
Page 2 of 4
75
FEEESTIMATE CltyofTukwlle
Tukwila Urban Center, Patlestriar(/Blcoe Bridge
Page 3 of 4
76
Project Project Project
I
Multiplier r,
Partner I I Intern I Admin I Specs I QA /QC
Manager Designer
I I
Architect
31b4f
Tack SCOPE OF WORK
I I I I I
I
72,84 39.42 44.23 34.86 23.56 18.75 I 39.42 I 38.42 I
ContractAnloum
Remit.
Deep Foundations
I I I I I I$
West Abutment I
I I I I I I I
East Abutment
I I I I I I I
Arch Steel Pipes
I I I I I I I
Arch Abutment Connections 1
I I I I I I I
Arch Tension Ties I
I I I I I I I
Arch MiscellaneousConnections
I I I I I I I
DeckSuperstructureFraming I
I I I I I I I
Deck Slab I
I I 1 I I I I
Deck Hand Railing I
I I I I I I I
Arch Suspension Hangers
I I I I I I I
9.03 WastApproach Ramp Design
I I I I _...I I I
Shaft Foundations I
I I I I I I I
Concrete Columns I
I I I I I 1
Structural Earth Walls
I I I I I I I
Steel Superstructure
I I I I I I I
Deck Slab
I I I I I I I
Hand Railings
I I I 1 I I I
9.04 EsdApproach Ramp Dealt I
I I I I I I I
Shaft Foundations
I I I I I I I
Concrete Columns I
I I I I I I I
Structural Earth Walls I
I I i I 1 I I
Steel Superstructure 1
I I I I I I I
Deck Slab I
1 I I I I I I
Hand Railings
I I I I I I I
9.05 Miscellanecusstructurea J
I I I I I I I
Wayrinding Sign Supports and Foundations 1
I I I I I I I
Utility Protection Structures 1
I I I I I I 1
MiscellaneousRetainingWalls
I I I I I I I
LightingSupportsandFoundations
I I I I I I I
9.06 Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count 358) I
I I I I I I
General Notes and Abbreviations I
I I I I I I I
General Plan and Elevation
I I I I I I I
Horizontal Control Plan
I 1 I I I I I
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
I I 1 1 I I I
Foundation Layout I
I I I I I I I
Pile Details
I I I I I I I
West Abutment Plan and Elevations
I I I I I I I
WestAbutmentDetails I
I I I I I I I
EastAbutment Plan and Elevations I
I I I I I I I
East Abutment Details
I I I I I I I
Superstructure Layout I
I I I I I I 1
Arch Plan and Elevation
I I I 1 1 I I
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Arch Details (3 Sheets) 1
I I I I I I I
Arch Tension Ties I
I I I I I I I
ArchTensionTieDetails
I I I I I I I
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets)
I 1 I 1 I I I
Deck Framing Plan
I I 1 I I I I
Deck Sections (2 Sheets) I
I I I I I I I
Deck Details (2 Sheets) I
I I I I 1 I I
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Deck Vert ical Support Layout (2 Sheets) I
I 1 I I I I I
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
West Approach Plan and Elevation I
I I I I I I I
West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
1 I I I I
West Approach Superstructure Sections
I I I I I I I
3
West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
I I 1 I I I I
West Approach Deck Sections 1
I I I I I I I
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) I
I I I I I I I
East Approach Plan and Elevation
I I I I 1 I I
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation I
I I I I I I I
EastApproach Superstructure Sections
I 1 I I I I I
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
East Approach Deck Sections I
I I I I 1 I I
East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
9.07 DelNarables
30%PSESubmRfal I
I I I I I I 1
30% PSE Plan Set
I I I I 1 I I
S
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs
1 I I I I I I
30% PSE QA/QC
I I 1 I I I I
I
I I I I I I
60%PSESubmftfal
I I I I I I I
60% PSE Plan Set
1 I I I I I I
Specification Outline
I I I I I I I
Updated Quantities and Costs
I I I I I I I
Responses to City 30 %PSE Comments I
I I I I I I I
60 PSE QA/QC
1 I I I I I 1
I
I I I I I I I
90%PSESubmftl
I I I I I I I
90% PSE Plan Set
I I I I I I I
Draft Specification I
1 I I I I I I
Updated Quantities and Costs
I I I I I i
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments
1 I I I I I I
90% PSE QA/QC I
I I 1 I I I I
I
I I I I I I I
Final PSE Submittal I
I I I I I I I
Final PSE Plan Set I
I I I I I I I
Final Specification
I I I I I I I
FinalQuantitiesandCosts I
I I I I I I I
Responses to City 90% PSE Comments
I I I I I I I
Final PSE QA/QC I
I I I I I I I
Reimbursables
1
I
Subtotal
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0,0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1
Page 3 of 4
76
FEEESDMATE CityofTukwile
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Siuycie Bridge
p *4110001
s Partner
Project
Project I
Project I
Intern I Admin
I Specs I QA/QC
Multiplier
Manager
Designer 1 Architedt
3.154/
Teak SCOPE OF WORK
S 7284 I
39 42 I
44.23 I 34.86 I
23.56 I 1815
I 39.42 I 38.42
Reimb. 1 ConuiletAmu
10.0 Bridge AaatheOd Collaboration(LMN)
10.01 Bridge Structure
I I
I
I
I
1
I 1
Arch Geometry
14.0 I
16.0 1
80.0 I
I
40.0 I
I 1
19,342.35
Arch Color
M 2.0 l
10 1
20
I
2.0 I
I 1
1,011.65
Connections Susp Cables
M 2.0 I
1.0 I
2.0 I
I
2.0 I
I I
1,011.65
Connections Bridge Deck
2.0 I
1.0 I
2.0 I
1
2.0 1
I I
1,011.65
Connections Abutments
M 2.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
1
20 I
1 I,
1,011.65
Connections Tied Arch
2.0 I
1.0 1
2.0 1
I
20 1
I 1
1011.65
Connections Lateral Support
M 2.0 I
1.0 I
20 1
1
2.0 1
1 I
1011.65
10.02 Approach Ramps
M I
I
I
I
I
I I
Column Treatments
2.0 I
1.0 I
2.0 1
1
2.0 I
I I
1,011.65
Superstructure Treatments
2.0 I
1.0 1
2.0 1
1
2.0 I
I I
1011.65
Deck Treatments
M 2.0 1
1.0 1
20 1
1
2.0 1
1 I
1,011.65
Earthwall Treatments
2.0 1
1.0 1
20 1
1
2.0 1
1 I
1011.65
Handrail System
l 2.0 I
2.0 I
2.0 1
I
2.0 I
1 I
1,136.01
10.03 Draft Beek of Design Document
M I
I
I
I
I
I I
10.04 30%Plan Set
y i
10.0 i
60 I
I
16.0 1
I 1 10.0
4482.01
10.05 30% PSE Debrief (with city)
M 2.0 I
4.0 I
4.0 1
I
I
I I
1,515.14
10.06 Iinonli CWral Sheets /Design
M I
I
I
I
I
I
Code Sheet
M 1
6.0 1
I
10.0 I
6.0 1
I 1
2,291.83
Elevations
1
10.0 1
10.0 1
16.0 I
6.0 I
1 I
4.844.42
Sections (2 sheets)
I
10.0 1
16.0 1
26.0
10.0 1
i I
7,078,64
Connection Details (2 sheets)
l 1
10.0 1
16.0 I
26.0 1
10.0 I
1 1
7,078.64
Lighting Coordination
M 1
6.0 I
6.0 1
10.0 1
6.0 1
1 I
3,12902
Approach Sections, East
I
80 I
8.0 1
20.0 1
100 1
1 1
5,053.83
Approach Secitons, West
M I
8.0 1
8.0 1
20.0 1
10.0 1
I I
5,053.83
Handrail Details
4
B.0 1
10.0 1
200 1
10.0 1
1 1
5,332.89
Study Model Development
l I
1
10.0 I
20.0 1
40.0
1 I
6,56737
10.07 Final Beals of Desigi Document
N I
I
I
1
I
1 I
10.08 50%Submtol
M I
I
I
I
I
I I
60% Plan Set
N 16.0 1
10 -0 1
I
SOA I
20.0 I
I I 16.0
9,445.68
Outline Specs
M I
10.0 I
4.0 1
10.0 I
I
1 26.0 I 8.0
7,104.38
60 %PSE Debrief (with city)
1 2.0 1
4.0 I
4.0 1
4.0 i
1
1
1,955.03
City Comment Review /Response to 30%
1 4.0 1
20.0 1
4.0 1
1
10.0 1
I I
4,707.70
10.09 90%subml0al
1 I
I
I
I
t
1 1
90% Plan Set
h 100 1
50.0 I
26.0 I
80.0 I
50.0 I
I 1 10.0
25,869.74
Draft Specs
1
10.0 1
4.0
20.0 1
I
1 26.0 1 8.0
8,204.11
90 %PSE Debrief (with city)
l 2.0 I
4.0 I
I
4.0 1
I
I 1
1,39690
City Comment Review Response to 60%
M 2.0 1
10.0 1
10.0 1
16.0 1
1 8.0
1 I
5,331.25
10.10 100%SubmMal
y i
I
I
I
I
I I
100% Plan Set
8.0 I
16.0 1
16.0 1
24.0 1
24.0 1
1
10,483.70
Final Specs
l I
4.0 1
I
8.0 1
1
1 16.0
3.366.95
City Comment Review /Response to 90%
2.0 1
oe:_......_ue.:
8.0 1
8.0 1
16.0 1
1 4.0
1
2500.00 1
4,566.87
2,500.00
Subtotal 84.0 254.0 1 272.0 1 350.0 1 290.0 1 12.0 1 69.0 1 52.0 1 S 2,500.00 1 167,955.13
x d u..:.. .t,...' .s.
gki' .t....... .....M y;...t.t
X 11.0 Urban Design and way Finding
11.01 Illumination M I I 1 I I I I S
11.02 Wayfintling, Furnishings Signal l I 1 i I 1 1 1
11.03 Landscaping and Irrigation I I I I I I I I
11.04 Walkway Select ion /Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies 1 1 I I I I I
Subtotal 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 00 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 S I$
.....0 l :.a„� k iIo ke
12.0 Typea. Size, and Location Report (Complete)
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I 1
Reimbursables 1
Subtotall 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is 1$
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
Page 4 of 4
77
FEEESRMATE CRY fTUkMla
Tukwila Urban Carde, Pedeatrlan/81eyole 8ndge
o
w Sen or Senior Somor Staff CAD /GIS Project Support M It pI er_
Principal Assude,a Senior I I Project I SCAO
Assoc ate project Staff
Tech C oord. Staff 3258]
Teak I SCOPE OFVgRK
I I I I I I I I I
ComraetAmouft
I I
65.00 56.00 47 00 40.00 36 DD 32.00 30.00 25.00 31.00
24.00 29.00 1].00 Re orb
➢:ac4i5iY
1.0 Prided Manaaamar& and AdminW"Wn
h!:_ x =x �vwx,: ,.,..:xs. ....axx
101 Prol1 S ch edule
1oz Design Team supplemental Aareemenss I
I I I I I I
I I
103 Progress Reports I
I I I I I I I
I
1.04 1--s
1.05 Team Meetrngs(Assume 12 meetings& 3 City Workshops) I
I I I I I I I
I 1
ConsultantMeen ngs w/ city (A,,,,, 12 meeung) I
I I I I I I I
I
Consu) fort[ l oternaI Meebngs(A -a 12 meeting) I
I I I I I I
I 1
Reimbursables
I
I
Subtotal:
.x:. �•=aa4�
I I
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I�
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1$
20 Deel CMerh D-hr errt
201 Design Criteria Draft I
I I I I I I I
I I
202 Design Cntena Final I
I I I I I I I I
1
Reimbursables
Subtotal
I 1
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I.$
4., ere
1 3.0_ i a!hlo and BoundaNS -WJaG KPFF CMR
301 Topographic Mepp!,'Phasel I
I I I I I I I I I
I
302 Topographic Ma pp mg Phasel I
I I 1 I I I I I I
I
303 5...yBaseReview I
I I I I I
I
Reimbursables
al
I
I 1
Subtotal
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I'
0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I
.M ,n:i !o-r',@;___ avav- cr3!a+i�.xrnh:ri'�.rriw.3'i
�:atrsz.� �a3:!:i'!1ua$.'sne�n!!ivi iiigk3.x m'urenxihi
x um�nw Yi ixa�+ dtau!ieid
4.0 Qeotechnlal Reaereh and Reed andetiom
401 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing I
I I I I 40 I I 440 I I
I 20 1
424283
402 Seotechnical Evaluation. Repomng. and Meetings 1
80 I I I I 64.0 I 1 1 1
20 1 60 1 40
10,14759
403 Rewewof Reportand Comments I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I
Reimbursables
14.156.00
Subtat& 1
I I I I
&0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 88.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 44.0 1 0.0
20 1 8.0 1 4.0 1 14;058.00
28.546.42
5.0 Kydreulim(KPFF CMn
501 Meet with Agencies I
I I I I I I I I
I I
502 Establish 100-year Floodplain I
I I I I I I I I
I
503 Establish Structure) Clearance I
I I 1 I I I I
Reimbursable.--
I
Subtotal)
I
0.0 1. 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 f
6.0 Ena er!ta1 end PermhBng Services (Landau KPFF CMn
6.01 seam. Agency, antl PreApplication Meetings I
I I 60 140.0 I I I I I
I E
19,167.6]
6 SEPA Checklist I
02
I I 20 I 110 I I I 80 1 I
I 40 I 10
295564
603 AST LOCaI Programs ECS 1
I 1 30 140 1 1 80 I I I
I 50 I 10
3594.35
6.04 Phase EnvironmentalSne Assessment I
I 10.0 I I I I 54.0 I 40
15.0 I ]0 8
8,433.52
605 Biological Assessor oVEFH I
1 I 60 400 I I 36.0 1 I
50 12.0 1 1.0
11,467.37
606 Cultural Resources Investigation I
1 1 80 1 I I I
4.0 1
1.420.79
6.07 Shoreline Permit 1
1 I 3.0 360 1 1 I 4.0 I
16.0 I 40
7,289.71
6.08 Wetland/W..rway Delineation 1
I I 20 1 260 I I 34.0 I I I 10.0
10.0 I 1.0
9.251.45
6.09 Critical Areas Report I
I 1 60 1 300 I I 26.0 I I I 24.0
I 10.0 I 1.0
10.96553
6.10 M itigation Construction Documents 1
40 I 1 360 1 290 I I I I 36.0
3.0 I
14,061.29
6.11 JARPA I
I
I I 1.0 80 I I 8.0 I I I
I 3.0 I SO
2.36907
612 Aquatic Lands Easement I
I I 20 80 I I I I
I 20 I 10
1.59350
Reimbursables
11.476001
11.47600
Subtabll
4.0 1 10.0 1 67.0 1 580.0 1 0.0 1 700.0 I 16.0 1 54.0 I 78.0 I
5.0 1 84.0 1 18.0 11478.00
104 045 89 1
w.Y .::..:ra t:': ss... �..'9x°� .i!
7.0 ProlectWarWhop:_......_..
7.01 oternal Team PSE Kickoff Meeting I
I I I I I I I I
I I
7.02 TSL Review& Project Kickoff Meeting I
I I I I I I I I
I I
7.03 Tied Arch Gonceptwprkehop I
I I I I I I I I
I I
Tied Arch Altematives Graphics I
I I I I I I I
I I
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop I
I I I I 1 I I I
I I
West Approach I
I I I I I I
I
East Apo roacn I
I I I I 1 I I I
I I
705 Final Concept Selection Workshop I
I I 1 1 1 I I 1
1 I
Connection Detail sketches I
I 1 I I I I
I I
Surface Fh Examples I
I I I I I I
I I
Color Examples I
1 I I I 1 I
I I
Study Model Development I
I I I I I I
I I
sketch Up Qualiry Penderings(6) I
1 I I I I 1 I
I I
706 Publido"sach I
I I I I I I
Graphics I
I I I I I I I I
I I
I
Reimbursables
I
8.0 ON Engin q
8.01 aad Con-W~cp wd Preferred AR Seleedw
8.02 Bib Prep and D.molma
8.03 Kod[atei and VOMC.1 layout
Route Layout
Horizonte' Control
Ramptransitions
Vertical Alignment
Vehicular Crossing of Trail
Rechannelintion Baker St
Riverview Plaza Dnveway Reconst,,,b,n
804 0redirM and Paving Model
otlel
Typical Section
Coord wO KGFD no USAGE
805 fmC
806 Surfaee VMWr
Ti
Site Dram.ge
Inflltrat-
807 tMlities
City antl Private Relocations
Franchise Utility Coordination
Seattle Publ is Utility Coord -mr,
808 Channellaetlonand Sl9ning
Parking Lot Revisions
Roadway Signing
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study
Rechan al-ton Baker St
1 0.0 1 0.0 4 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1. 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
8
1
Page 1 of 4 p
7 U
FEEEBTIMATE CilyoTTUkwlla
Tukwila Ultme Center, Pedes0lah/Blcycle Bridge
Page 2 of 4
79
Send,
Senior ff Senior
D Pro ect Su rt
CA OIS
M It 1
p
f
Pnncipall
Assoc ate
IASSOC atel Senior
I Prolect I
",a, I S[af/ I I CAD I
Tech I Coortl. I Staff
3258]
Tack SODPEOFMRR
1
1
1
1 I
1 1
I
I C�An
6500 5600
$4700 40001
3600
$32,00 30.001 2500 3100
24.00 29001 17.001
Re mb
Otw
8.09 Co Eegmaee
I I
I
I I
I I I
I
I
30
I
I
I I
I I I
I I
60
I
I I
I I I
I I
8
90%
I
I
I I
I I
I j
Final
810 Bpecir"done
6o%outline
I I
I I I
I I 1
I I
90%speaal Provisions
I I
I I I
I I I
I
Final Special Provisions
I I
I I I
I
I I I
I I
8.11 Pmneheata
30
I
I I I
I
I I 1
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
TESL Plans (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I I
I I
Roadwaysections(Isheep
Plan /Profile Sneets (3 sheets)
sheets)
Dri
utniry(3seets)
h
I I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
ChannelaadpnandSignmg(3aheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
QC Review
I j I
I I
I
I I 1
I
I I
I
I
j I I I
I
•60%
I
I
I
I I I I
I I
1
Site Prep ambon(a sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
TESC Plans (a sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I j
TESC D-1 (I sheet)
RoadwayS ens(lsheep
I I I
I I
1
I I I I
I I
s
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I I I
I I
I I I
I I
PaviegDetail(isheet)
I I I
I I
I 1 I
I I
Dramage (4 she
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Drainage Ca l(I sheep
I I I
I I
I
I I�I
I
Utlity(3 sheets)
I I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
JebtyD I(I sheet)
I I I
I
I
I I I I
I
ChannelizationaneSigning(4 sheets)
CnannelaabonDetall(isheep
QCRevlew
I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
1
sax
1 I I
I I
1
I I I I
I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
TESL Plans (4 sha
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
TESC Detail (I sheep
I I I
I I
1
I I
I
Roadway Sections (I S heap
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
Plan/Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
P_ngDetad(Isheet)
Drainage(3sheets)
DrainageDetau(Isheet)
utility(3sheets)
I
I
I
I I I I
I I
Ublity Detail (I sheep
I
1
I
I I I
I
Channelaanon and Signing is sheets)
channelization Denali (Isheet)
I I I
I 1
I
I I
I
QC Review
1 I I
I I
I
II
I
1
10s%
I I I
I I
I
I I
j
I I
(a sneers)
I I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
T Plans (4 s
T E S C Plans (a sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
TESC Detail (S sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I
I I
Roadway sec[ipns(I sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I
Paving Datel(I sheet)
I I
I
I
I I I I
I
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I I I
f I
Drainage De tall (i sheet)
I
I
I
I I 1 I
I
urlity(ssheets)
I I I
I
I
I I I
I
Utility Derail (1 sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I�I
I
Channehzahon and Signmg(4 sheets)
I I I
I I
I I I
channerzation D Sheet)
I I I
I I
1 1 I
I I
I I
QC Review
I
FinalRidSet
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
SO Prepambon (4 sheets)
TESCPIans(4sheets)
TESC D-1 (I sheep
I I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
Roatlway Sections(I sheep
I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
1
I
I I I I
I I
Paving Detail (I sheep
I I
I j
I
I I I
I
D (4 sheets)
I I I
I 1
I
I I�I
I
Dremage Dated 11 sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I
I ihty(3 sheets)
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
I
Udi'l Detan(I sheep
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
I
Channelization and Sig mng(a sheets)
I I I
I I
1
I I I I
I
Channelned- Detel(l sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I 1 I
I I
QCRevlew
I I I
I I
I
I I
I
I
Reimbursables
I
SutdaW l 0.0 I 0.0 I
0.0 I 0.0 I
as-
0.0 I
0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I '0.0
ataa..u�:::�ss
0.0 I 0.0 I. 0.0 1$
sa:ws�x ��zasx::xe s- `�v -mv e
9.0 SthhIurel Em dnaeHln MPFF)
.s�
iTi.'+
siuin•
.$""1�
901 BeWotDaign
I I
I
I
I I I
I I
902 Bridgl
I I
I
I
I I I
I I
Deep Foundabons
I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
West Abutment
I I I
1
I
I I I I
I I
East Abutment
I I I
I I
I
I I I
j I
ArchSte
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
Arch Abutment Connections
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
ArchTe M-T,es
I I
I I
I
I I 1
I I
Arch Misceuaneousconnections
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
1 I
DeckS p— tuctere Framing
Deck Slab
I I I
I I
I
I I 1 I
I
Deck Hand Ra i ng
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
ArchSUSpensionHangars
I I I
I I
I
I I 1 I
I
903 Wsst Approach Ramp Design
Shaft Foundations
I 1 I
I I
I
I I I
1
Concretecommns
I
I I
I
I 1 I
I
8
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
Deckslab
Hand Railings
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
904 East Approach Ramp Design
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
Shaff Foundations
1 I I
I I
I I I I
I I
Concratecowmns
I I I
I I
I_I I
I I
Structural Earth Walls
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Steelsuperstructure
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Deckshi,
1 I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Page 2 of 4
79
FEEMIMTE Ceyof Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Career, Padestnan/Bicycle Bridge
Prolec[ I Staffr I Staff I S11 I C Tech S l Coo I SSteffrt 3 258
17
32 00 I 30.00 I 25.00 I 3100 I 24 00 I 2900
I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I i I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I_I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
OFEM®
CamractAmount
a
Subtptell 00 1 00 1
Principal I sell IASSOC ate Senior I ben or
m� lllE ii.w ,1„
Assoc ate Protect
Task SCOPE OF WORK
I I I I
10.01 Bfld gestrucWro I I I
65 00 56.00 47 00 40 00 36.00
Hand Railings
1 I I I
905 Mbcelleneow Structures
I I I I
Wayfinding Sign Supports and Foundations
I 1 I I
utility Protection Struetures
1 I I I I
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
I I I I
Lighting Supports and Foundations
I I I I
906 Anticipated Structural Plan Sheeb(Shest Count: 358)
I I I I
General Notes and Abbreviations
I I I I
General Plan and Elevation
I I I
Horizontal convol Plan
I I I
construction sepuence (2sneets)
I I I
Foundaton Layout
I I I
Pile Details
I I I I
West Abutment Plan and Elevaaons
I I I
West Abutment Details
I I I I I
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
I I 1 I 1
Eaat Abutment Details
I I I I
Superstructure Layout
I I I
Arch Plan and Elevation
1 I I 1
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
1 I I I I
Aren Tension Ties
I I I I I
Arch Tension Tle Details
I I I I
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets)
I
I I I I I
Deck Framing Plan
I I I I
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I
Deck Details(2 sheets)
I I I I
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
I I I I
Deck V.—I Support Layout(2 Sheets)
I I I
Deck Vertical Support Sections(2 Sheets)
I I I
Deck Vertical Support Detail.(2 Sheets)
I I
West Approach Plan and Elevatlon
I I I I
West Approach Foundation Plan antl Elevation
I I I I
West Approach Superstructure Sections
I I
West Approach Superstructure Details(2 Sheets)
I I 1
West Approach Deck Seen—
I 1 1 1
West Approach Deck Details(2Sheets)
I 1 I I
Easl Approach Plan and Bev.-
1 1 I I
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
1 I I 1
East Approach Superstructure Sections
I I I I I
Eas[Approach Superstructure Detail.(2 Sheets)
1 I I I I
East Approach Deck Sections
1 I I I I
East Approach Deck Details(2 Sheets)
1 I I I I
Miscellaneous Structures(2Sheets)
1 I I 1 I
9.07 DelNetablsa
I I I I I
30% psE Submittal
I I I I I
30% PSE Plan Set
1 I I 1 I
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and C—
I I I I I
30% PSE QA/QC
I I I I I
I I
6096 PSE Submlttel
I I I I
I I I I I
60% PSE Plan Set
I I I I I
Specification 0unine
I I I
updated Quantmes and costs
I I I I I
Responses to City 30 %PSE Comments
I I I I I
60% PSE QA/QC
I I I I I
9D% PSE Submittal
I I I I I
I I I I I
90 %PSE Plan Set
I 1 I I
Draft Speclapahon
I I I
updated Quantities and Coata
I I I
Responses to city 60 %PSE Comments
I I
90%PSE QA/QC
I I I
Final PSESubmltral
I I
I I I
Final PSE Plan Set
I I I
Flnalspeabcauon
I I
Final Quantities antl Costs
I I I
Responses %PSE Comments
I I I
Final PSE QA/QC
I I I
Prolec[ I Staffr I Staff I S11 I C Tech S l Coo I SSteffrt 3 258
17
32 00 I 30.00 I 25.00 I 3100 I 24 00 I 2900
I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I i I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I_I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
OFEM®
CamractAmount
a
Subtptell 00 1 00 1
0,0 1 00 1 00 I o0 1 0o I oo I o0 I o0 1 00 1 00 1$ I$
m� lllE ii.w ,1„
]A.O Bridge AaeMstice Coll boratlpn (LAIN)
10.01 Bfld gestrucWro I I I
I I I I I I 1
Arch Geometry I I I
I I I I I I
Arch Color I I I
I I I I I I 8
Connecton, S,sp Cables 1 I I
I I I I I I I 8
Connections Bridge Deck
Connections Abutments I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Connections -Tied arch I I I
I I I I I I I I 1
Connections Lateral Support I I I
I I I I I I I I I
1002 iuVri Ramps I I I
I I I I I I I I
Column Treatments I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Superstructure Treatments I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Deck Treatments I I I
I I I I I I I I
Earthwall Treatmenrs I I I
I I I I I
I I
Handrail System I I I
I I I I I I I
I I
1003 Drar
tBbofDasig,13 —rhere I I
I I I I I
I I
10.04 30%Plan Sa I I I
I I I I I_I I I I
10.05 30% PSE Debi(with dm I I I
I I I I I I I I I
1006 Archleefural Shisete /Design I I 1
I I I I I I I I
Code Sheet I 1 1
I I I I I 1 I I I
Eleven- I I I
I I I I I I I I I l
Secdona(2 sheets) I I
I I I I I I I I I
Connect on Details (2 sheers) I 1 I
I I I I I I I I I
Lighting COOrtlina4on I I
I I I I 1 I I I I
Approach Sections. East I I
I I I I I 1 I I I
Approach Secitons, West I I
I I I 1 1 I I I
Handrail Details I I
I I I I 1 1 I I I
Stud' Model Development I I I
I I I I I I
I I
1007 Final Sed fr Design Docunrere I
I I I I I I
I I
1008 60%Subtngtal I I
I I I I
I I
60%plan Sef I I
I I I I I I I
outlme specs I I
I I I I I I I I
6096 PSE Debrief (with city) I I
I I I I I I I
city Comment Review /Response to 30% I I
I I I I I I I I
1009 DD%Submgbl I I
I I I I I I I
9096 Plan Set
Draft Specs
90% PSE Debrief(with city) 1 I I
I I I I 1 I I
Page 3 of 4
80
FEEESTIMATE' CilyefTukwila
Tukwila Urban Carder. Padeatriar /Blgcle Brklga
I Senor I
I I Senor I I Senor I 3W1 I Senior IUD /GIST Pal. I So.- 1
10 Itle 4
Tank I
Assoc ate P
Project staff C
32581 -µt
Cary Comment Review /Response to 60% I I I I
I I I I I 1 I
1010 10096 Sub m Mbl 1 I I I
I i I I I I I 1
Soo %Plan Set I I I I
I I I i I I I
fmalsoecs 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I I
CnvGommentReyiew /R,,Ponse to 90% I I
Reimbursables I
I M
MEW
Subbalall 0.0 I 0.0 I 0
0.0 I 0.0 'I 0
0.0 I 0.0 1
1 0.0 1 OA I 0:0
$W_ s"aam," .:°u-. ':t
Page 4 of 4
81
82