Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E09-017 - WESTFIELD SOUTHCENTER MALL / LEE NICHOLAS - NORTHEAST PARKING PHASE I SEPA ADDENDUMNICHOLAS I AFAF�/WESTFIFJ AD NORTHEAST PARKING PHASE I E09-017 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, JVfayor Department of Community Development JackPace,'Director SEPA ADDENDUM TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE SOUTHCENTER MALL EXPANSION Description of current proposal: Inclusion of the 2.9 acre parcel (King County Assessor's parcel # 3597000257) in the northeast corner of the subject block. Redevelopment of this parcel could occur in two phases. Phase 1 is for demolition of the approximately 400 square foot former Bank of America drive -through structure and replacement with 239 parking spaces. Phase 2 is for demolition of the adjacent 8,717 square foot bank building and replacement with 103 parking spaces. File number: E09-017 Proponent: Westfield Corporation Inc. Location of current proposal: Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter is an 82 acre site located in the block bounded by Tukwila Parkway, Southcenter Parkway, Stander BL and Andover Park West. I-5 and I-405 intersect near the northwest corner of the shopping center. The EIS excluded the Bank of America Parcel in the northeast corner of the site. This Addendum adds that parcel to the proposal and analysis. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Title of documents being added to: Draft Environmental Impact Statement issued by the City of Tukwila on June 21, 2004 and Final Environmental Impact Statement issued by the City of Tukwila on October 6, 2004. Date documents being added to were prepared: DEIS - June 21 2004; FEIS - October 6, 2004. If the documents being added to were challenged (WAC 197-114530), please describe: The DEIS and FEIS were not challenged. The document is available to be read at: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188, Monday thru Friday, 8:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report dated July 7, 2010, the lead agency has determined that there are no additional adverse significant impacts associated with the Bank of America parcel redevelopment other than those that were identified and mitigated as part of the original DEIS and FEIS. This addendum adds information and analyses about a proposal but does not substantially change the analyses of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing EIS prepared for expansion of Southcenter Mall. sM Page 1 of HAA BoA Demo\adoption addendum.doc 07/13/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 The DEIS and FEIS evaluated a total project build -out of 787,903 gross building square feet at the Southcenter Mall site, summarized potential environmental impacts, and identified possible mitigation measures for those impacts. To date, Westfield has built 453,149 square feet of space. With the Bank of America parcel redevelopment, no new square footage will be built but the existing building will add 8,717 square footage to the project for a total gain of 461,866 square feet. The square footage will remain under the total square footage evaluated in the FEIS. There are no changes to the project that are likely to have significant adverse impacts that were not adequately addressed in the environmental documents. Address: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100; Tukwila, WA 98188 Contact person: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Responsible official: J k Pace, Director Signature: Phone: 206 433 7166 Phone: 206 4313670 Date: Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84- 05-020 (Order DE 83-39), § 197-11-965, filed 2/10/84, effective 4/4/84. SM Page 2 of 2 MA BoA Demo\adoption addendum.doc 07/13/2010 City of Tukwila Jiro Haggerton, Mavor Department of Community Development Jack Pace. Director To: Jack Pace, SEPA Official " Community Development Director From: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Date: 8 July, 2010 Subject: Westfield EIS Addendum to include Northeast Parking Phase I & Phase II (former Bank of America parcel) File No. E09-017, Staff Report Proposal Phase 1: Demolition of the approximately 400 square foot former Bank of America drive -through structure and replacement with surface parking. Phase 2: Demolition or relocation of the adjacent, approximately 8,717 square foot bank building and redevelop into surface parking. Location The former Bank of America parcel (359700-0257) is in the northeast corner of the Westfield property (Mall) and is bounded by Tukwila Parkway to the north and Andover Park West to the east. The EIS excluded the 3 acre former Bank of America parcel from the Westfield property which is located on 82 acres in the block otherwise bounded by Tukwila Parkway, Southcenter Parkway, Stander Boulevard and Andover Park West. This Addendum adds that parcel to the proposal and analysis. Background The City of Tukwila was approached by the Westfield Co. in 2003 regarding their proposal to expand their recently purchased facility, Southcenter Mall. On April 24, 2003 a Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice was issued. The focus of the EIS was on transportation, air quality and on the impacts on local government operations and services. A DEIS was issued in June 2004 and the FEIS was issued in October 2004. (File No. E03-010) Construction proceeded in 2005-2008 for a portion of the square footage that was analyzed in the EIS. The following information supplements the information contained in the "SEPA COMPLIANCE DOCUMENT" prepared by Westfield and considers the impacts associated with the Proposal described above. The applicant has listed mitigating measures in their SEPA checklist dated 11/6/09 associated with adding the former Bank of America parcel that will be incorporated into their project. Findings Westfield has returned to the City proposing to include the former Bank of America parcel within the overall Mall property. The most recent use of this parcel is as a bank building and adjacent drive -through facility. The site has been vacant since July 27, 2009 when the bank relocated to a new building on the south side of the site. The existing drive -through facility will be demolished and redeveloped into 239 surface parking stalls as Phase 1. Phase 2 would involve demolition of the existing bank building and develop of an additional 103 stalls into surface parking. There are no immediate plans to proceed with Phase 2. The DEIS review evaluated expanding the size of the Mall by no more than 787,903 square feet to 2,226,274 square feet of gross building area (GBA) with the majority of the development occurring generally to the south. With the addition of the former Bank Building, the Mall will have added 461,866 square feet of GBA, well under their EIS expansion allowance. The DEIS proposed a parking supply of 7,900 stalls. The Mall currently has 6,669 stalls. There is an opportunity to restripe to create 46 additional stalls. Reconfiguring the Bank parcel will add 342 stalls after both phases. The total stall count could be 7,011 stalls and is within the parking space impacts evaluated under the EIS. Air Quality Impacts to air quality were related to the peak hour automobile traffic. For the EIS, a quantitative analysis concluded that the proposal would not likely exceed National Ambient Air quality Standards. The proposed revisions associated with incorporating this existing building into the Mall property should have little to no impact to air quality. Only asbestos is listed as a potential containment on the Puget Sound Clean Air.Agency web site. Demolition of the Bank of America building could potentially lead to exposure of asbestos containing building material. The applicant will be subject to compliance with the rules regarding asbestos and demolition and will conduct asbestos abatement as necessary in all structures prior to demolition. SM Page 1 of 2 07/13/2010 HAA BoA Demo\Addendum staff remn.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 4100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Water Resources Storm Water The applicant will be required to comply with the storm water manual in affect when any applications are submitted and complete for that site. The addition of this parcel is not subject to the Development Agreement that covers the rest of the site. Sanitary Sewer No impacts are expected as no change is proposed to the Sanitary Sewer system. Plants and Animals The applicant has designed the parking lot layout to retain as many mature trees as possible. The DEIS states that the Proposed Action would result in no change in the vegetated area, and hence, no changes in wildlife use. The applicant references in their SEPA Compliance Document that there will be some loss of existing landscaping to the Bank of America property including the elimination of 34 mature trees. Much of the lost landscaped area is only vegetated in manicured lawn and provides minimal wildlife habitat. Transportation The demolition of either the drive -through or the bank building will not generate additional trips other than on a temporary basis during construction. The surface parking that is proposed for Phase 1 and Phase 2 is an accessory use to either the site and/or the Mall and will not be generating any trips. The transportation impacts of creating additional surface parking stalls were adequately addressed in the original EIS, concurrency with transportation standards is maintained and no further study is required. The SEPA addendum does not address impacts from or the issue of traffic impact fees or credits due to potential changes in occupancy or use of the existing bank building. Traffic impact fees or credits will be determined prior to occupancy of the existing building. Parking The DEIS stated that the proposed expansion did not provide adequate parking. The proponent would either increase parking supply on -site to meet code requirements for parking or would seek a parking variance to authorize the reduced parking supply. The applicant obtained a parking variance (1,04-055). This project will increase the parking supply on the site. This proposal lessons the impacts to parking and no further review is required. Solid Waste Westfield evaluated the waste associated with the proposed demolition. _They identified under Air Quality the possibility of asbestos in the Bank of America and there will be the need to safely remove that material from both buildings. Archeological and Historical The subject site was completely paved in the late 1960s. This proposed plan may require some excavation, at which time there may be some uncovering of artifacts of archeological significance. There are records that show an important historical site along the river to the east of the project. To the north of the project site is a stream that leads to the archeological site along the river. Depths of soil fill and proposed excavations shall be identified during the permitting process. Existing City standards (18.50.110 TMC) stipulate procedures for archaeological conservation and preservation. Conclusion The City has reviewed the Westfield Expansion DEIS and FEIS (City of Tukwila, 2004) and the additional information provided by the applicant and determined that it, along with City staff analysis, is adequate in evaluating the impacts associated with including the former Bank of America parcel into the scope of the Final EIS. Related Information 1. SEPA Checklist (File E09-017) 2. Development permit for demolition and repaving (File D09-237) 3. Initial DNS and Scoping Notice (File E03-010) 4. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter Expansion (City of Tukwila 6/2004) 5. Final EIS Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter Expansion (City of Tukwila 10/2004) 6. Westfield EIS Addendum Southcenter Mall -- withdrawn (File E08-021) 7. Development Agreement (File DA07-003) 8. Proposed Parking Count Plan (Westfield 09/26/2005) 9. Parking Decision (File L04-055) 10. Parking Decision Amendment (File L04-055) 11. Bank of America (new) Design Review Staff Report (File L08-001) 12. Westfield Expansion Development Permit (File D06-147, addendum J) 13. Westfield Southcenter Area and Parking Summary -Draft (5/11/12) SM Page 2 of 2 07/13/2010 HAA BoA Demo\Addendum staff report.doc City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Jim Haggerton, Mayor Jack Pace, Director To: Jack Pace, SEPA Official �� `� r\ '� C O Community Development Director From: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Date: x July, 201.0� Subject: Westfield EIS Addendum to include Northeast Parking Phase I & Phase II (former Bank of America parcel) File No. E09-017 Proposal Phase 1: Demolition of the approximately 400 square foot former Bank of America drive -through structure and replacement with surface parking. Phase 2: Demolition or relocation of the adjacent, approximately 8,717 square foot bank building and redevelop into surface parking. Location The former Bank of America parcel (359700-0257) is in the northeast corner of the Westfield property (Mall) and is bounded by Tukwila Parkway to the north and Andover Park West to the east. The EIS excluded the 3 acre former Bank of America parcel from the Westfield property which is located on 82 acres in the block otherwise bounded by Tukwila Parkway, Southcenter Parkway, Stander Boulevard and Andover Park West. This Addendum adds that parcel to the proposal and analysis. Background The City of Tukwila was approached by the Westfield Co. in 2003 regarding their proposal to expand their recently purchased facility, Southcenter Mall. On April 24, 2003 a Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice was issued. The focus of the EIS was on transportation, air quality and on the impacts on local government operations and services. A DEIS was issued in June 2004 and the FEIS was issued in October 2004. (File No. E03-010) Construction proceeded in 2005-2008 for a portion of the square footage that was analyzed in the EIS. The following information supplements the information contained in the "SEPA COMPLIANCE DOCUMENT" prepared by Westfield and considers the impacts associated with the Proposal described above. The applicant has listed mitigating measures in their SEPA checklist dated 11/6/09 associated with adding the former Bank of America parcel that � will be incorporated into their project. Findings Westfield has returned to the City proposing to include the former Bank of America parcel within the overall Mall property. The most recent use of this parcel is as a bank building and adjacent drive -through facility. The site has been vacant since July 27, 2009 when the bank relocated to a new building on the south side of the site. The existing drive -through facility will be demolished and redeveloped into 239 surface parking stalls as Phase 1. Phase 2 would involve demolition of the existing bank building and develop of an additional 103 stalls into surface parking. There are no immediate plans to proceed with Phase 2. The DEIS review evaluated expanding the size of the Mall by no more than 787,903 square feet to 2,226,274 square feet of gross building area (GBA) with the majority of the development occurring generally to the south. With the addition of the former Bank Building, the Mall will have added 461,866 square feet of GBA, well under their EIS expansion allowance. The DEIS proposed a parking supply of 7,900 stalls. The Mall currently has 6,669 stalls. There is an opportunity to restripe to create 46 additional stalls. Reconfiguring the Bank parcel will add 342 stalls after both phases. The total stall count could be 7,011 stalls and is within the parking space impacts evaluated under the EIS. SM Page 1 of 4 HAA BoA Demo\Addendum staff report.doc 07/01/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 tA Air Quality Impacts to air quality were related to the peak hour automobile traffic. For the EIS, a quantitative analysis concluded that the proposal would not likely exceed National Ambient Air quality Standards. The proposed revisions associated with incorporating this existing building into the Mall property should have little to no impact to air quality. Only asbestos is listed as a potential containment on the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency web site. Demolition of the Bank of America building could potentially lead to exposure of asbestos containing building material. The applicant will be subject to compliance with the rules regarding asbestos and demolition and will conduct asbestos abatement as necessary in all structures prior to demolition. Water Resources Storm Water The applicant will be required to comply with the storm water manual in affect when any applications are submitted and complete for that site. The addition of this parcel is not subject to the Development Agreement that covers the rest of the site. Sanitary Sewer No impacts are expected as no change is proposed to the Sanitary Sewer system. Plants and Animals The applicant has designed the parking lot layout to retain as many mature trees as possible. The DEIS states that the Proposed Action would result in no change in the vegetated area, and hence, no changes in wildlife use. The applicant references in their SEPA Compliance Document that there will be some loss of existing landscaping to the Bank of America property including the elimination of 34 mature trees. Much of the lost landscaped area is only vegetated in manicured lawn and provides minimal wildlife habitat. Transportation The demolition of either the drive -through or the bank building will not generate additional trips other than on a temporary basis during construction. The surface parking that is proposed for Phase 1 and Phase 2 is an accessory use to either the site and/or the Mall and will not be generating any trips. The transportation impacts of creating additional surface parking stalls were adequately addressed in the original EIS, concurrency with transportation standards is maintained and no further study is required. The SEPA addendum does not address impacts from or the issue of traffic impact fees or credits due to potential changes in occupancy or use of the existing bank building. Parkin The final parking stall count for the proposal will be verified through the building permit (D09-237) and subsequent permits if Phase 2 is executed. All parking and drive -aisles must conform to City standards and the parking lot layout will be reviewed for code compliance as a part of the building permit review. The final parking lot lay -out may be different than the lay -out shown on the site plan submitted with this request. This report will determine the required quantity of parking stalls; approval of pending and future development permits will require that parking standards are met. The entire site, including the addition of the former bank parcel, is subject to a Binding Site Improvement Plan (see file 1,10-032); the BSIP will allow all parcels on the site access to parking. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) bases parking on useable floor areal (UFA) and TMC Title 18 requires 5 stalls for every 1,000 square feet of UFA for a Planned Shopping Center, Mall. In the Draft EIS, proposed narking does not meet code and the applicant pursued a parking determination that is used to calculate required parking (L04-055). According to the EIS, the original mall size is 1,438,371 sf gross building area (GBA). The GBA of the mall after the addition and with the former bank building added is 1,900,231'sf. The EIS uses Gross Leasable Floor Area (GLFA) defined as gross building area less common and service areas to determine parking requirements. In the EIS, GLFA was based on proposed plans and is 90% of the original site and 87% of the entire expanded Mall. Using the Mall's lease plans, the original mall GLFA was 86% of GBA; the ' "Useable Floor Area" means that part of the floor area of any structure which is actually used from time to time for any commercial purposes, such as a sales area, display area, walkways or storage area. Parking calculation shall not include common corridors designed for the circulation of people at non -retail establishments, restrooms, elevator shafts and stairwells at each floor, mechanical equipment rooms or attic spaces and exterior covered loading docks. (Definition chapter of the TMC, 18.06.863) In this case, Usable Floor Area can only be estimated due to the leasing arrangements of the shopping center and is assumed to be 5% less than Gross Leasable Floor Area (GLFA). SM Page 2 of 4 07/01/2010 HAA BoA Demo\Addendum staff report.doc expanded Mall GLA is 87% of GBA. The actual lease agreements between the Mall and tenants sometimes include common corridors and other areas that should be removed from GLFA using the EIS definition of GLFA. Therefore, lease agreements do not provide an accurate measure of GLFA. While the interior of the mall space and the interior lease lines may regularly be in flux, the GBA is constant and the percentage of GLFA has remained essentially constant before and after the expansion. In order to allow an orderly and consistent determination of GLFA, staff recommends defining GLFA as 87% of GBA. This percentage is the amount assumed in the EIS after the expansion and the amount demonstrated by the mall's lease agreements at the present time. Otherwise, each time a tenant improvement comes into the City, the lease lines will determine the GLFA and the parking requirements will be fluid based on tenant leases. Further, the mall received an amendment to the parking decision (L04-055) granting a "complementary use" allowance up to 10%2 of the total UFA for the following uses and percentages: ■ 100 percent of attached food related vendors, both restaurants and food services within the mall or attached, plus ■ 25 percent of the out parcel food related businesses, plus \ 7 • 100 percent of the library square footage, plus S� ■ 10 percent of the in mall service uses, plus c� ■ 10 percent of the theater square footage. ✓� J According to the Westfield Southcenter Area and Parking Summary, 146,932 sf can be allowed as complementary use. V, Using this formula, GLFA is 1,525,375 sf (87% of the GBA after complimentary uses have been subtracted or .87(1,900,237 sf GBA — 146,93 .sf comp. use). 'c The City of Tukwila parking code uses UFA to determine parking. In the parking determination (1,04-055), UFA could not be known at that time because of the preliminary nature of construction plans; it was assumed to be 5% less than GLFA. Using this formula, the UFA is 1,449,10sf (1,525,375 sf GLFA * .95). Parking for the mall is at 5 stalls per 1000 sf of UFA or 7,246 stalls. (The additional but existing 8,717 feet of building area that comprises the former bank building is included as part of the total building area until such time that the existing bank building is demolished.) The mall received an administrative parking variance that allows a 4.5 percent reduction from the total number of required stalls (1,04- 055). This reduces the final parking required for the mall (at the current build -out of 1,900,280 sf of GLA) including parking for the former Bank of America building at 6,926 stalls3. i °1 The site, absent the Bank of America parcel, provides 6,669 parking stalls. A restriping plan has been proposed that will provide 46 additional stalls. At the completion of Phase I, the site will have 6,954 stalls. The site will have a surplus of 34 stalls in Phase 1 and 137 at the conclusion of Phase 2. Solid Waste Westfield evaluated the waste stream associated with the proposed demolition. They identified under Air Quality the possibility of asbestos in the Bank of America and there will be the need to safely remove that material from both buildings. Archeological and Historical The subject site was completely paved in the late 1960s. This proposed plan may require some excavation, at which time there may be some uncovering of artifacts of archeological significance. There are records that show an important historical site along the river to the east of the project. To the north of the project site is a stream that leads to the archeological site along the river. Depths of soil fill and proposed excavations shall be identified during the permitting process. Existing City standards (18.50.110 TMC) stipulate procedures for archaeological conservation and preservation. Summary 2 The complimentary use allowance is up to 10% of UFA. UFA in this case needs to be calculated as if the complimentary use has not been subtracted out (GLFA * .87'=UFA). 10% of UFA when calculated this way is 165,321 sf. The 10% complimentary use allowance is less than 10% of UFA and meets the requirement. 3 The final formula for dete required parking is: 1 {(GBA—Comp Uses )*.87 LFA *.95=UFA {(1,9,0,0,280 sf-146,932 sf)*.87}*.95=1,449,142 sf UFA at 5 stalls/1000 sf­� Required Parking 1,449,119'sf*.005 stalls=7,246 stalls Required Parking less 4.5% reduction= Total Required Parking 7,246 stalls *.955= 6,930,stalls SM Page 3 of 4 07/01/2010 HAA BoA Demo\Addendum staff report.doc The City has reviewed the Westfield Expansion DEIS and FEIS (City of Tukwila, 2004) and the additional information provided by the applicant and determined that it, along with City staff analysis, is adequate in evaluating the impacts associated with including the former Bank of America parcel into the scope of the Final EIS. Related Information 1. SEPA Checklist (File E09-017) 2. Development permit for demolition and repaving (File D09-237) 3. Initial DNS and Scoping Notice (File E03-010) 4. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter Expansion (City of Tukwila 6/2004) 5. Final EIS Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter Expansion (City of Tukwila 10/2004) 6. Westfield EIS Addendum Southcenter Mall -- withdrawn (File E08-021) 7. Development Agreement (File DA07-003) 8. Proposed Parking Count Plan (Westfield 09/26/2005) 9. Parking Decision (File L04-055) 10. Parking Decision Amendment (File L04-055) 11. Bank of America (new) Design Review Staff Report (File L08-001) 12. Westfield Expansion Development Permit (File D06-147, addendum J) 13. Westfield Southcenter Area and Parking Summary -Draft (5/11/12) SM Page 4 of 4 07/01/2010 HAA BoA Demo\Addendum staff report.doc Page 1 of 1 Stacy MacGregor - 3/22 Meeting regarding parking at Westfield From: Stacy MacGregor To: bfortunato@pacland.com; Nicholas Lee Date: 03/22/2010 3:46 PM Subject: 3/22 Meeting regarding parking at Westfield Attachments: Nick and Bill - I have attached the parking decision and amended parking decision to this email. Before I can make a decision on the parking options, you will provide me with an updated parking stall need based on the parking stall number required by the attached decisions and the current mall floor area. Also, you will review the conditions of the parking decisions and verify that the conditions have been met. I will review the files that went into creating the parking decisions are review the code to determine if any of the following options are available: 1. Restripe select areas that exceed current code in terms of stall or drive -aisle dimensions. 2. Restripe some (conforming) standard stalls to conforming compact stalls. 3. Restripe substandard perimeter stalls to conforming compact stalls. 4. Revisit the former BofA parking lot layout. Creating stalls would occur at the expense of trees. Please let me know if I missed anything. Regards, Stacy Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday -Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm Please consider the environnicni hcfore printing this c-mail file: //C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\4BA790D3tuk-mail6300-no 1001783331164761\GWI0000I.H_._ 03/24/2010 Page 1 of 1 Stacy MacGregor - Tukwila Westfield Southcenter North B of A Phase 1 & 2 Layout From: 'Bill Fortunato" To: "Stacy MacGregor" Date: 02/24/2010 5:48 PM Subject: Tukwila Westfield Southcenter North B of A Phase 1 & 2 Layout Attachments: Stacy - Please find the attached revised drawings per your comments. Couple of things to note: 1. The western most parking entrance has been modified to right out only. The throated option lost approximately 8 parking stalls. I believe this will meet the intent of your concerns. 2. Landscape islands have been added to meet the requirements for the landscape islands. 3. 1 will need to provide a calculation for buffer averaging to you along the frontage. From the initial calculation, the site plan has enough to accommodate all of the area on Andover Park West. 4. 1 have not gotten final direction for the raised walkway from Westfield. Lastly, I apologize for the delay in responding. My second child decided to arrive a little early. It threw off my schedule quite a bit. Thanks. Bill Fortunato PAC LAND 1505 Westlake Ave N., Suite 305 Seattle, WA 98109 Office: (206) 522-9510 x1125 Fax: (206) 522-8344 TURNING VISIONS INTO REALITY From: Max Berde Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:08 PM To: Bill Fortunato Subject: Tukwila Westfield Southcenter North B of A Phase 1 & 2 Layout Revised phase 1 and 2 parking layout attached as PDFs. Max Berde PAC LAND 1505 Westlake Ave N., Suite 305 Seattle, WA 98109 Office: (206) 522-9510 Fax: (206) 522-8344 TURNING VISIONSINTOREALITY file://C:\Temp\XPRmwise\4B856671tuk-mai16300-0o1001783331160751\GW100001_H__ 03/03/2010 z_. Page 1 of 1 Stacy MacGregor - BofA Demo for SEPA From: Stacy MacGregor To: Nicholas Lee Date: 02/02/2010 5:04 PM Subject: BofA Demo for SEPA CC: bfortunato@pacland.com Attachments: bfortunato@pacland.com Hi Nick, Bill and I spoke last week and went over the latest parking lot layout for the BofA demo, plan set dated 1-22- 2010. Bill's effort and success in saving so many trees is greatly appreciated. The following is a summary of the items we discussed with items 1,2, & 3 marked on the attached site plan. 1. The exit at the south-west corner is a potential conflict point with the intersection to the west. Bill is working to eliminate that point of conflict. ALandscaping is required every 10 stalls. There is some existing landscaping on the 5th parking strip (west to east) that may be incorporated. The existing "ivy wall" may run between the fronts of the head -in stalls and may be able to be incorporated into the design without a loss of parking stalls. J3. There is both a need and an opportunity to incorporate pedestrian paths into this design. A path from Andover Park West along the south side of the parcel will allow for a much needed east -west pedestrian connection into the mall. With the east facing entrance into Seafood City, the pedestrian crossing from the BofA to the south ought to be relocated to the west side of the eastern most 4-way on the east -west drive -aisle. 4. Landscape perimeter averaging will be needed to get this plan approved. I will support your application for perimeter averaging. An application for Type 2-Special Permission is attached;the fee is $400. 5. Bill will note the stall width for the standard and compact stalls on the plan. From you I am waiting for gross building area added in the expansion and an accurate parking stall count. ,5tacy Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday -Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm n �'� Please consider the environment before printing this c-mail file:HC:\Temp\XP2rpwise\4B685BOCtuk-mail6300-no1OO17R333115C'131\C,,W�nnnni a mimi?nin (02/03/2010) Stacy MacGregor - Re: M` CIS addendum - ---- Page-1 From: Cyndy Knighton To: Stacy MacGregor Date: 01 /20/2010 5:41 PM Subject: Re: Mall EIS addendum Okay, it's much clearer. >>> On 01/20/2010 at 2:43 PM, Stacy MacGregor <stacy-mOci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > FYI: The EIS Addendum is for 2 phases of demo and the addition of the BofA > parcel to the Mall's EIS; Phase 1 is demolishing the drive -through and > converting the area to parking. Phase 2 is for demolishing the bank building > and converting the area to parking. In the interim, the bank building could > be re -occupied. > Transportation Element: > The demolition of either the drive -through or the bank building will not > generate additional trips other than on a temporary basis during > construction. The surface parking that is proposed for phase 1 and phase 2 > is an accessory use to either the site and/or the Mall and will not be > generating any trips. The transportation impacts of creating additional > surface parking stalls were adequately addressed in the original EIS, > concurrency with transportation standards is maintained and no further study > is required. > The SEPA addendum does not address impacts from or the issue of traffic > impact fees or credits due to potential changes in occupancy or use of the > existing bank building. > Stacy > Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner > 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 > Monday -Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm > P Please consider the environment before printing this c-mail (01/20/2010) Stacy MacGregor - Re: S- 'q Bank of America DEMO Page 1 From: Cyndy Knighton To: Stacy MacGregor Date: 01/19/2010 12:01 PM Subject: Re: SEPA Bank of America DEMO If I understand you correctly, this is solely about the demo of the drive -through building. The paragraph at the end of your email is confusing to me, perhaps because it is taken out of context of the rest of your report. If the SEPA modification is only about the demo, it think it confuses the issue to bring forward the possibility of re -tenanting the building. If the SEPA modification does talk about this possibility, then I suggest you remove the language about credits for the building as it's already been established that the building will have no trip credits (presuming it will have been vacant for more than 12 months when this is all done). Cyndy >>> On 01/15/2010 at 12:55 PM, Stacy MacGregor < stagy- m@ci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > Cyndy, > Then Mall wants a change in the language I proposed in the transportation > element of their EIS Addendum for the BofA demolition. The proposal is for > demo of the Drive-thru structure and creation of surface parking. If a > tenant isn't found for the bank building, they may demo it also. > I quoted you initially when you said: > The following changes in traffic assumptions were made by the City in its > transportation analysis: Trip generation from the existing Bank of America > site (Tax parcel id # 359700-0257) will not be credited to the Mall site. > Vesting of trips is done on a parcel basis not on an ownership basis. Any > credit for this parcel would be for redevelopment on this parcel. The > surface parking that is proposed is an accessory use associated with the Mall > and will not be generating trips. > If the Bank of America site is re -occupied, credit for trips from the former > Bank of America business is not allowed if the business has been vacant for > more than 12 months. > They are proposing: > Transportation > The proposal itself will not generate additional trips, other than on a > temporary basis during construction. Vehicles using the proposed > parking will be generated by the existing bank building or existing > development on the Mall site. The City concludes that the modifications > to the proposal were adequately addressed in the original EIS, > concurrency with transportation standards is maintained and no further > study is required. This evaluation does not address impacts from or the > issue of traffic impact fees or credits due to potential changes in > occupancy of the existing bank building. > Please let me know if this works for you or propose changes. > Thanks, > Stacy > Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner > 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 > Monday -Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Page 1 of 3 Stacy MacGregor - Fwd: RE: Glander - tree relocation cost From: Stacy MacGregor To: bfortunato@pacland.com; Nicholas Lee Date: 01/13/2010 10:42 AM Subject: Fwd: RE: Glander - tree relocation cost Nick and Bill, Regarding SEPA: Nick, propose some rephrasing of the Transportation section I can take to Cyndy for review. Regarding the demo permit: Moira forwarded me your email regarding the cost of tree relocation. Sandra, our staff environmentalist, agrees that cost and the chance of success in relocating the trees does not make it worth pursuing. In light of this, work towards the following: 1. Save as many existing trees as possible --the ones on the east perimeter and the outer row of the ones on the north perimeter appear to cause the least impact to the parking lot. 2. Perimeter landscape averaging is available to you. See TMC 18.52.020 (B1-5) for requirements. This may allow you to park to the north of the bank building. 3. Parking lot landscape islands are required every ten stalls. Our code doesn't offer flexibility to exchange interior lot landscaping with perimeter landscaping. 4. I would like to see a way for pedestrians to get from the two public streets to the main mall building safely. A sidewalk on the north side of the access drive off Andover Park West, separated by a solid hedge row or some structure to keep people from crossing anywhere other than the cross walk, is desired. This would provide a route through the parking lot and from the pubic sidewalk to the Mall. Losing landscaping for this walk is acceptable (provided parking lot landscaping to code is met). A crosswalk heading east -west across the east entrance to the BofA site is needed and a raised crossing from the BofA parcel crossing the access drive towards the mall is needed. Let me know what questions you have. Regards, Stacy Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner 206.433.7166 City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday -Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm fi Please consider the environment hetore printing this c-mail >>> Moira Bradshaw 01/05/2010 8:51 AM >>> file: //C:\Temp\XP2mwise\4B4DA390tuk-mail6300-no 1001783331158A11\GW100001.__ 01/13/7010 : CONTRACT #jO5::4 ,: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUKWILA$ WEA SOUTHCENTER LLC, AND PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC., FOR THE EXPANSION AND RENOVATION OF WESTFIELD SOUTHCENTER MALL Section 1: Parties 1.1 This Development Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Tukwila, a Washington Non -Charter Optional municipal Code City (the "City"), Prudential Financial Inc. ("Owner"), the majority owner of the property, and WEA Southcenter LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Westfield"), a lessee and developer of the property. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority of RCW 36.70B.170 through .210 under which a local government may enter into a development agreement with any entity having ownership or control of real property- within its jurisdiction. All three entities shall be known collectively as "the Parties" to this Agreement. Section 2: Recitals 2.1 Westfield Southcenter Mall, the development site, is located on land within the City of Tukwila, within the block bounded by Southcenter Parkway, Strander Boulevard, Andover Park West and Tukwila Parkway, excluding the Bank of America parcel in the northeast comer of the block_ The site, comprising approximatelybit B and shall is shown on be known as the Property Exhlbit `ProA and a legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit p �' ( p rty ). 2.2 Except for a portion owned by Federated Department Stores, Inc., the Property is owned by Prudential Financial Inc. and Westfield is the lessee of the Property pursuant to a long term lease. 2.3 The purpose of this Agreement is to address the expansion of the mall in accordance with development agreements under Washington State law (RCW 36.70B.160 et seq.), which authorize local governments to enter into development agreements with any entity having ownership or control of real property within a local government's jurisdiction. 2.4 The City and Westfield agree that Westfield's presence in the community provides significant economic and community benefit to the City and its residents. 2.5 Westfield would like to improve the market position of Southcenter as a regional, commercial shopping complex that offers a wide variety of merchandise options, commercial services, entertainment and retail opportunities for consumers. To accomplish this goal, Westfield proposes to expand the existing Southcenter complex by approximately 787,903 square feet of gross building area ("gba"), herein after referred to as the Project ("Project"). The Page �f� RIGINALS 1%' S Project may include retail uses, restaurants, a movie theater complex, a hotel, and parking structures that -are developed in phases. 2.6 The City reviewed the Project through an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS') entitled Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter Expansion dated October 6, 2004 (the "EIS Issuance Date % prepared pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW 43.21C. 2.7 On December 3, 2004, the City approved a Complementary Parking and Administrative Parking Variance (the "Parking Decision") subject to conditions that result in a reduction from the minimum number of required parking spaces for the Project. A copy of the Parking Decision is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 2.8 On December 13 2004 the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review ("BAR') granted Westfield design review approval fora site plan for 597,009 square feet of the Project (the "BAR Decision"). A copy of the Initial BAR Decision is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 2.9 Westfield and the City desire assurance that the Project will be developed in accordance with the ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of the City governing the development and use of land existing on the date of the EIS and subject to specific conditions of approval. This Agreement provides certainty and reduces the risk for all parties that the Project will be developed under the terms and conditions set forth herein. 2.10 The City, Westfield and Owner agree that each has entered into this Agreement knowingly and voluntarily, and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement 2.11 The Tukwila City Council held a public hearing to consider this Agreement on November 28, 2005. 2.12 The City, Westfield and Owner agree that the foregoing recitals are material to this Agreement, and that each Party has relied on the material nature of such terms and recitals in entering into this Agreement. Section 3: The Agreement TBEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties acknowledge and agree as follows: 3.1 Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date. Westfield shall have zi& (6) years from the Effective Date in which to apply for the building permits) needed to construct e entire ro�ect, un ess Parties sooner agree in writing to terminate or extend this Agreement ("Term"). The Term of this Agreement shall be tolled pending any appeals of any land use permits or approvals granted by the City necessary to complete the Project, and pending any delays in receipt of approvals or appeals of any state or federal agency necessary to complete the Project. Once Westfield submits a complete building permit application for the Project, this Agreement shall continue until such building permits (including any extension to the terms 6 Page 2 0V I thereof) expire, or until the City issues all required certificates of occupancy, whichever occurs first. 3.2 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective on the first date on which all Parties have executed this Agreement. 3.3 Vested Rights. The provisions of the Tukwila Municipal Code ("TMC"), excluding building and fire codes pursuant to TMC Chapter 16, in effect on the EIS Issuance Date shall apply to the Project, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement or by state or federally mandated laws preempting the City's authority to vest regulations for the Project. In addition, pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170(4) (Development Agreements — Authorized), the City reserves authority to impose new or different officially adopted regulations of general applicability; but only if, and to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety as determined by the City Council, and only after notice and an opportunity to be heard has been provided to Westfield. The Project shall not be subject to any development moratoria the City ma adopt subsequent to the date of s Agreement unless necessitated by a serious threat to the pu c health, safety and welfare. Section 4: Interrelationship Between Development Agreement and Other Approvals and Applications 4.1 Binding Nature; Conflict. Westfield and Owner shall be bound by this Agreement. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall apply to the Project, provided that, should an irreconcilable conflict arise between a term or condition in this Agreement and a term or condition in the BAR Decision or Parking Decision, or a modification to the BAR Decision or to the Parking Decision, the more restrictive of said terms shall be applied to the Project. 4.2 Prior Approvals. Westfield has received a BAR Decision on design issues and a Parking Decision on parking issues. Westfield shall comply with the conditions of the BAR Decision and Parking Decision or seek modifications thereto. The Parties also agree that design review approval is required for the remainder of the Project not included in the BAR Decision. The Parties agree that any modification to the approved design, any modification to the Parking Decision, and any additional design review approval required for the remainder of the Project shall not require an amendment to this Agreement so long as it does not increase the Projects gba. As part of reviewing any proposed modifications to the approved design, any modification to the Parking Decision, and any future design review for the remainder of the Project, the City shall not impose conditions on the Project inconsistent with any provision of this Agreement. 4.3 SEPA Compliance. The Parties acknowledge that the EIS fully and completely evaluated the environmental impacts for development of the Project and that further SEPA review may only be required if the criteria set forth in WAC §197-11-600(3)(b) (Part Six — Using Environmental Documents, SEPA Rules) are triggered. 4.4 Future Building Permits. The Parties acknowledge that the Project will require building permits and that conditions may be imposed on such building permits based upon applicable building and fire codes. Section 5: Transportation 5.1 Transportation Concurrency. The Parties evaluated the Project for transportation concurrency as part of the EIS. It was concluded that the Project meets City level of service standards and therefore is compliant. The Parties agree that Westfield shall not be required to construct or fund any transportation improvements to establish transportation concurrency. Further, the Parties agree that the City shall not require any additional transportation analysis as part of any future City permitting for the Project. 5.2 Transportation Impact Fees. a. The Parties have completed the technical analysis to determine the transportation impact fees due to mitigate the transportation impacts of the Project pursuant to TMC 9.48.150 (Transportation Concurrency Standards and Impact Fees). Based on that analysis, the Parties agree to the following transportation impact fee schedule for the Project: Project # 96-RW 18 Link or Intersection Southcenter Pazkwa & 168 West Valle & Strander Interurban Bridge Minkler (Andover Park West to Southcenter Impact Fee Due $15,200 $43,120 $19,920 $0 93-RW 11 89-RW 13 84-RW07 Parkway) Andover Park West (Tukwila Parkway to $271,150 88-RW04 Strander Blvd Andover Park East & Minkler Southcenter Parkway (180th to South City $25,960 $16,470 03-RW05 84-RW03 02-RW04 Limits) Southcenter Blvd. (51st to Tukwila $184,000 89-RW05 International Blvd. East Marginal (BAR to 112th)$0 Tukwila Urban Access/Klickitat Improvements Southcenter Parkway to I-5 $504,120' 84-RW 19 Total Trans ortation Impact Fees for the Pro'ect' $1 079,940 Note 1: This reflects $1,350,360 fee due for this transportation project less a credit of $846,240 for the Owner's dedication of right-of-wayfor this trans ortation prqiect. No additional transportation analysis and no additional transportation concurrency certificates shall be required for Westfield to construct the entire Project. b. These Transportation Impact Fees are based upon the trips generated from development of 787,903 square feet of gba, which is full buildout of the Project. Westfield shall only pay the proportion of Transportation Impact Fees owing prior to issuance of building permits for the Project based upon the proportional trips generated from the square footage of Page 4 ov] W development proposed in such building permits as compared to the trips generated from full buildout. 5.3 Tukwila Urban Access/Klickitat Improvement Project. The City has begun design of the y Tukwila Urban Access/Klickitat Improvement project, Project 84-RW19 (the "Klickitat Project"). The Parties agree that the design will include as a design alternative a new vehicular ingress only "slip ramp" (the "Slip Ramp") that will provide access by northbound traffic north of Strander Boulevard down into the Property, a pedestrian access via a separated pedestrian walkway from Southcenter Parkway, and a retaining wall as necessary to support the Southcenter Parkway improvements for Phase I (the "Klickitat Wall"). If the Sears Tire, Batteries and Accessories (TBA) store is built prior to the construction of the Klickitat Project, Westfield shall build a retaining wall for the TBA pad (the "TBA Wall'). and submit documentation to the City that confirms the cost of the TBA Wall (the "TBA Wall Costs"). In the event that the City uses the TBA Wall as a portion of the Klickitat Project or removes the TBA Wall, Westfield shall be compensated by the City for the TBA Wall Costs as follows: (a) in cash at completion of the Klickitat Project; (b) in the form of a credit in the amount of the TBA Wall Costs against any LID assessment for the Klickitat Project; or (c) a combination of (a) and (b) that fully compensates Westfield. If the TBA Wall is removed in whole or in part by the construction of the Slip Ramp, no compensation shall be due from the City. If the Slip Ramp design alternative is chosen by Westfield to be included in their final project, Westfield shall reimburse the City for all construction costs associated with the construction of the Slip Ramp and separated pedestrian walkway, but not for costs associated with the Klickitat Wall. 5.4 Transportation Improvement Project Credit Westfield and/or Owner shall dedicate the �. right-of-way necessary for the Klickitat Project. Westfield and/or Owner shall also dedicate, at no expense to the City, the right-of-way necessary for the Slip Ramp and the separated pedestrian access, if Westfield agrees to fund these additional improvements. Westfield has received a credit in the amount of $846,240 against the Traffic Impact Fees for the dedication of right of way necessary for the Klickitat Project. This credit is reflected in the reduced Transportation Impact Fee delineated in Section 5.2. The Parties agree that such dedicated right of way shall not include any parking lot or circulation driveways in the Project. 5.5 No Protest LID Agreement. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Westfield and Owner shall execute individual no protest LID Agreements for the following future projects: • Improvements to Tukwila Parkway • 61" Avenue South Bridge Widening • Tukwila Urban Access/Klickitat Improvement Project Westfield shall receive a credit against the assessment for the Tukwila Urban Access/Klickitat Improvement Project LID for that portion of the Impact Fees paid pursuant to Paragraph 5.2 that are attributable to the Tukwila Urban Access/Klickitat Improvement Project. Each agreement to not protest the formation of a future Local Improvement District shall include the right of Westfield and the Owner to protest the methodology and/or specific amount of any LID assessment. 5.6 Frontage Improvements. a. Westfield shall provide frontage improvements along Andover Park West from Strander Boulevard north to the new limits of the existing bus pullout, and from Baker Boulevard north to the Bank of America property line; along Tukwila Parkway between the Bahama Breeze access and the Bank of America property line (all these improvements are hereinafter referred to as "Frontage Improvements"). The Frontage Improvements shall be designed and constructed consistent with the following: 1. Landscaping shall be completed pursuant to the Tukwila Street Tree Program for the CBD Sidewalk Project; however, tree placement is preferred between traffic and sidewalk whenever practicable. 2. Sidewalk sections shall be concrete and a minimum of six feet (6') in width except that, in locations where the sidewalk is adjacent to an existing traffic control cabinet or light pole, the sidewalk may be reduced to the minimum ADA width. 3. All light poles or other obstructions (e.g. signal control cabinets) may either be located or relocated behind the sidewalk or, at Westfield's discretion, the light pole or other obstruction may remain within the sidewalk, but the sidewalk shall be widened to provide clear passage around the pole or other obstruction so long as the width is consistent with ADA standards. The only exception to this provision is if a sight distance or turning radius issue is created by the pole or obstruction at the Strander Blvd. and eastern driveway location. If, at this one location, the City determines that sight distance or turning radius standards cannot be met, the pole or obstruction shall be relocated at Westfield's expense, or Westfield shall provide engineering substantiation demonstrating that turning movement and sight distance standards will be met without such relocation. 4. All public sidewalks may be installed on easements. 5. The Frontage Improvements are illustrated on Exhibit E ("Frontage Improvement Design") attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Should a conflict arise between the text in this Section 5.6 and the Frontage Improvement Design, the conflict shall be resolved by mutual agreement of the Parties. b. The westerly access on Strander Blvd. shall be relocated so that it aligns with the existing driveway on the south. side of Strander Blvd. that provides access to the "rear" parking/service area of Target and the primary entrance to the Tukwila Pond Park. Westfield shall construct a traffic signal with full turning movements at this access. The Parties agree that no public safety concerns at this access have been forecast to warrant turning movement restrictions. Should the City identify, in the future, safety concerns that may warrant turning movement restrictions, the City shall provide notice to Westfield and a reasonable opportunity to comment and propose alternative measures to address potential safety concerns. C. Westfield shall provide restriping, if necessary, so that channelization in Baker Blvd. matches changes in the Andover Park West/Baker Blvd. intersection. Page 6 0;-e j rp 10 d. Westfield shall provide the City with easements for the maintenance of the traffic signal loops that are present on the Property. The City shall bill Westfield on an annual basis for the actual maintenance performed on the traffic loops. e. The Project plans must include an extension of the Andover Park West transit center pullout to the south by thirty feet (30') subject to approval by adjacent tenants; however this shall not restrict the City from closing this access under its authority under the State of Washington Constitution. f. The Project plans must include modifications to the two accesses to the U.S. Post Office to permit right in/right out with widths between twenty-five feet (25') and thirty-five feet (35% and include closing of the two accesses located in front of the Firestone building, all subject to approval by adjacent tenants; however this shall not restrict the City from closing this ei access under its authority under the State of Washington Constitution. JJ g. Any future changes to access points or intersections must be designed to align Civil plans must include information on the with existing adjacent access driveways. neighboring accesses/intersections. h. To accommodate sidewalks, utilities and temporary construction, Westfield shall provide a new 15-foot wide easement along Andover Park West in those areas of the existing 10- foot and 5-foot easements. The existing 10-foot and 5-foot easements shall be extinguished. ,, T Section 6: Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Utilities 6.1 General. The Project will require removal of a substantial amount of the utilities infrastructure on the south side of the site, but will have only minimal effect upon the north side utilities. The Owner, Westfield and the City agree that the utilities are in fair shape, except for a bow in the sewer line north of Mervyn's Department Store, which is located in the northeast portion of the Property and which needs to be corrected. All of the fire and irrigation cross - connection controls on the north side of the development nt aze met, and up to sufficient sewer and watate. So long er the requirements of Sections 6.2 and 6.3 of this Agree t, capacity exists for the Project. The City shall not withhold any permit approvals for the Project on account of insufficient water or sanitary sewer capacity to accommodate the Project. The City shall not require any additional off -site water, sewer or surface water infrastructure improvements to support the Project. The Parties agree to the conditions set forth in the remaining subsections of this Section for any building permit(s) for the Project. 6.2 Water Service. a. A water availability certificate shall be issued by the City upon Owner and Westfield completion of the following: 1. Submission of a site survey locating the existing 8-inch water line along Southcenter Parkway and its 15-foot easement, and an accurate provision of a new easement, if needed, that coincides with the actual location of the water line. Page 7 0 fe) 2. Installation, at Westfield's expense, of two 10-inch valves; one on the east side and one on the west side of the site. Owner and Westfield shall own and maintain all existing and new water system infrastructure between the two valves, except water meters exterior to the building, which shall belong to the City pursuant to TMC Chapter 14.04 (Water Rates and Regulations). 3. Upsizing, at Westfield's expense, to a new 12 inch water line, those portions of the existing 10-inch water line on the south side of the Property that must be relocated in order to construct the Project. No further conditions need to be satisfied for issuance of the water availability certificate. b. There are approximately nineteen existing external connections to the looped, 10- inch mains. Some of these connections are water supply to the building and some of these connections are for irrigation. All water supply connections to the building shall have City owned meters at the private main. The City shall install these meters. Exhibit F shows the City's responsibilities for the installation of the meters. The City agrees to waive the permanent installation meter fees. Westfield shall meet current City standards for all new connections as follows: 1. Installation of a reduced pressure principle assembly ("RPPA") between each water supply meter and the building, locating each RPPA as close to its meter as possible. 2. On lines that Westfield replaces, upgrade the water only (irrigation meters), as needed to meet the City's current standard. 3. On lines that Westfield replaces, upgrade the cross connection control (backflow prevention) on the irrigation meters as needed. 4. Provision of an easement benefiting the City for each meter, new or existing. - C. The City shall include the capacity provided by the new line in its fire flow modeling. 6.3 Sewer Service. a. In 2006, the City shall repair the sewer line north of Mervyn's to remove the bow in the pipe. b. Upon the City's completion of sewer line repair work north of Mervyn's, Owner and Westfield shall accept ownership and assume maintenance responsibilities for the existing sewer system from the connection at the main in Andover Park West throughout the Property. 6.4 Surface Water. The Parties analyzed the potential stormwater impacts of the Project in the EIS. The EIS concluded that because the Project would not increase the amount of impervious surface at Southcenter, the Project would generate no additional effect on water 12 Page 8 0X 110 quantity relative to existing conditions. The EIS furthe�oco�c� d that Ong and � interior mall Project includes converting some existing surface parking areas into space, the Project would have a net positive effect on the quality of surface water runoff for Southcenter. Based on this analysis, the Parties agree that no new or additional stormwater art of the Project. Westfield has agreed to include additional detention will be required asp stormwater quality treatment on the south side of the Property (e.g., in -line stormwater treatment vaults) as part of the Project to improve the quality of the stormwater nmoff generated by Southcenter. 6.5 Ownership of Utilities. In 1969, the City entered into a Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities and Utility Right -of --Way Agreement the "Utility Agreement') with Southcenter Shopping n and Center Corporation, Boncom Corporation, Allied Stores Corporatioprovided Connecticut that he Insurance, the then -owners and lessee of the Property. The Utility Agreement sanitary sewer trunk lines and laterals, storm sewer trunk by einoeaend laterals, and the Property were laterals (referred to anasd`vUv reittylneLines") maftee ma�'nrnt�ained by the City. conveyed to the City Upon completion of the utility repair noted in this Agreement, the City and Owner shall execute a Bill of Sale, in the form generally as attached hereto as Exhibit G, transferring to Owner ownership of and maintenance responsibility for those Utility inspectionesantifinewe in ere Bill of Sale. an Owner shall grant easements to the City for access to ter meters constructed as part of the Project. Section 7: Remaining Development Conditions 7.1 Power Sunvly Distribution. Westfield shall enter development inate with get Sound Energy through the addition of"a for additional electrical capacity for the shopping c new distribution feeder circuit to the existingsystem that presently serves the the Parties anticipate that hhe bes� source center campus. As of the Effective Date of this Agreement come from theconduit Southcenter by PSE for an additional circuit would cpathway placed exists from the Parkway and approximately S. 16o St. An empty c at Strander Blvd. To meet this condition, substation to the south side of the Southcenter property Westfield shall extend a vault and conduit system north from and ntie rnnto the ction oexist snare g P parkway and Strander Blvd., near the former enterncampus.ItreA this west side location, new conduit conduits on the west side of the shoppingitatepathway and vault infrastructure will be provided by Westfield edto necessary to serve the newand and primary power switching and transformation equipment renovated development on the shopping center site. The new feeder circuit would then extend from 'the substation through the conduit system on the Soutlicenter site to tie into the of Southcenter on Andover Park West tiAs ng PSE primary power circuitry located on the east side needed, PSE shall add additional station transformer capacity at both Southcenter and Renton Junction substations. 7.2 Communications. Westfield shall upgra de the existing Qwest Communications main point of presence ("MPOP") space located inside Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter to meet the anticipated increased voice and data services demand to meet the increasethe Project. If hn existing space is maintained and expansion occurs in another area in order Page 9 ove Ile 1 P3 G demand, Westfield shall protect and provide maintenance access to the existing communications path while digging during construction. If the extent of digging precludes from protecting the existing communications path, Westfield shall relocate all communications components (preferably in one location). If so, Westfield shall provide new conduit and updated service equipment. Westfield is responsible for any and all upgrades that would enable Qwest to serve Southcenter. s. Westfield shall control fugitive dust during construction of the 7,3 Air Quality Measure Project using reasonable precautions as provided by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. 7.4 Emergency Measures. Westfield shall maintain �times.�Westfi Weto the stfieldoject shall scoordinate ite during construction in order to retain current emergency response displacement of parking and/or disruption to vehicular o destrian lion, traffic patterns with Southcenter management and Tukwila Police and Fire prior con 7.5 Security Measures. Westfield shall take the following � � g service demands created by the in order to improve existing police service to Southcenter and to meet Project: a. Short-term Construction. Westfield shall provide site security measures during Project construction, such as security patrols, fencing, lightingand and otherprovision sunauthorized activities.equipment, in order to discourage theft, vandalism, tresp g, Westfield shall work with the Tukwila Police Department, where possible, to implement these security measures. b. Radio Communications. Westfield shall coordinate during design and construction of the Project to establish a mutually acceptable Tukwila Police Department and Fire Department transmission and reception with the Valley Communications Center throughout the Property. C. Community Resource Center. Westfield shall provide a tenant space in the ble Project and designated parking areas for the City of Tukwilan and sizice e of the space, ent, to which shall upon the certificate of occupancy of the Project. The to be mutually agreeable, shall provide visibility and convenience thus us enabling the City Tukwila a Police Department personnel to support Property safety cty. d. Property Li�htin , and Security Cameras. Westfield shall provide adequate exterior and/or interior security cameras and adequate exterior and garag lighting comply that with City standards. 7.6 Recyclinle � Program. Westfield shall providde vehiclecoltion points and haul routes Westfield shall designate designed to minimize impacts to pedestrian an recycling space that is equal to or greater than space allotted for garbage bins and compactors and work with the City to maintain an effective recycling program, including recycling of plastic film, apparel bags, paper, cardboard bottles and can. 14 Page 10 of A kin Stall Dimension. Westfield shall be allowed to maintain its existing parking stall 7.7 Par replace such striping in its existing configuration striping for buildout of the Project and may p where surface parking and circulation areas are reconstructed for the Project. Section 8: Transfer of Property by Westfield and or Owner ll, transfer, .1 Authorit to Transfer. Westfield's and Owner's ding rght eal prop property interests mortgage, = other similar action rcgar 8 hypothecate, convey or take any this Agreement, provided, however, Property or any financing thereto shall not be infringed by that any such sale, transfer, sale, lease, etc. shall be subject to the terms and conditions, rights and obligations of this Agreement. Bement shall be binding upon all subsequent heirs, 8.2 Obli ations of Successors. This Agr rs assi , purchasers, owners, lessees or lessors and trans f shall be eleased from all successors, owner/Westfield kind. Upon transfer of all interest in the Property, obligations under this Agreement. at any time, and from time to time, 8.3 Estoypel Certificate. The Owner or Westfieldoma ,, at in writing that, to the knowledge certify deliver written notice to the City requesting the City is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the Parties; of the City (i) this Agreementor in writing, and if so ('li) this Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally is not in default in the the amendments; and (iii) the requesting Party amended, identifying or if in default, to describe therein the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, and amount of any such defaults. The City shall execute naturehave the right to return such executeficate any thirty (30) days following the receipt thereof. The City s shall not have any liability certificate requested by the Owner or d Westfield hereunder - to The City oII if it provides the estoppel the requesting Party or to any third party certificate in good faith and with reasonable care. Section 9: Binding Nature; Modification 9.1 Binding Nature. once executed, this Agreement shall be binding on the Parties to this . Agreem ent and their heirs, successors and assigns, from the effective date through the term of the Agreement. 9.2 Modification or Termination of Agreement. a. This Agre ement may be modified or terminated only upon the mutual written agreement of the City Council, Westfield and the Owner and its successors, and/or assigns. b, In addition, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force effect u on the completion of the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of this and P ancy. permits. Agreement, including issuance of all requiredoccu P 9.3 Other A reements. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the development of the Project. Page 11 ofIr I � 15 Section 10: General Terms 10.1 Venue. Venue for all disputes arising under or connected with this Agreement and its component parts shall be the Superior Court of King County. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 10.2 No Waiver of Police Power or Condemnation Authority. The City does not waive its police power or condemnation authority by entering into this Agreement, but shall not exercise its police power in any manner inconsistent with this Agreement 10.3 Covenant Running with the Land. This Agreement and its component parts shall be covenants running with the land and/or equitable servitudes, and shall be binding on the Parties and their successors and assigns, and on all subsequent owners, purchasers, lessees or lessors, and transferees of every nature as set forth herein. Westfield shall record a full and complete original of this Agreement. against title to the Property within* five (5) days following the effective date of this Agreement with the Real Property Records Division of the King County Records and Elections Department. 10.4 Owner's and Westfield's Responsibility. Any act or omission required of or permitted by the Owner or Westfield may be taken by the Owner or Westfield or by its agents, contractors or employees; provided that the Owner and Westfield shall not thereby be relieved of its responsibility or liability to the City under this Agreement. 10.5 Attorneys Fees. In any action arising under or related to this Agreement, each Party shall bear its own attorney fees and expenses, whether at trial or on appeal, or in any bankruptcy proceeding. 10.6 Specific Performance. In the event that any Parry fails to perform as set forth in this Agreement, the non -defaulting Parry or Parties shall be entitled to pursue specific performance against the defaulting Party. The Parties acknowledge that money damages and remedies at law generally are inadequate and specific performance and other non -monetary relief are particularly appropriate remedies for the enforcement of this Agreement and should be available to the Parties for the following reasons: a. Money damages are inadequate to compensate the Parties for the unique benefits available through this Agreement; and b. Due to the size, nature and scope of the Project, it may not be practical or possible to restore Southcenter to its natural condition once implementation of this Agreement has begun. 10.7 No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is for the benefit of the Parties hereto only and is not intended to benefit any other person or entity, and no person or entity a signatory to this Agreement shall have any third party beneficiary or other rights whatsoever under this Agreement. No other person or entity not a Party to this Agreement may enforce the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 16 Page 12 of W IIYU. ID, 12TH FLOOR 90025 BUILDING CODE INFORMATION O HISTORY OF BUILDING T GROSS 310--893-4178 35 ENGINEERS UITE 118 6 448 8182 )O 167-D554 Fox % Suite 106 '73 78-P-_- Fax Uite 601 22-8344 Fox 11-4614 Fox 100 33-6777 Fox 16-3424 FAX ID i i2-2192 FAX ASSOCIATES COLUMN GRIDS (EXISTING) - ------ - - - -- COLUMN GRIDS (NEW) -veTAa NUMBER __ _ WALL SECTIONS I---DRAW'.4 NW.BER -DETAIL NUUW BUILDING SECTIONS I—DRA'MND NlMBILR >X IN WALL ELEVATIONS DATE. OF ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION _- -_ 11/16/1966 DATE OF ADDITION/REMODFL 09/16/91 USE GROUP CLASSIFICATION M-COVERED MALL CODES TO WHICH PROJECT WAS DESIGNED TO WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE 1966 CONSTRUCTION TYPE — TYPE II-B - UNPROTECTED NONCOMBUSTIBLE GROSS MAU FlUILDING AREAS (AFTER DEMOLITION AND NEW ADDITION, WITHOUT ANCHORS) FIRST FLOOR AREA 663,727 SF SECOND FLOOR AREA 241,688 SF THIRD FLOOR AREA 84.440 SF TOTAL 989,655 SF O PROPOSED CODE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE WITH WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS 2003 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE WITH WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS _ 2003. INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE WITH WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS 2003 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE WITH WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS 2003 WASHINGTON NON RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE _ 2004 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE WITH WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS 2003 HANUICAP CODE CHAPTER 11 IBC AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE UI EMENTS FOR BARRIER FHE INCLUDING (CC/ANSI A117.1-2003 AND APPENDIX E �3 CONSTRUCTION TYPES and REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION TYPE FOR NEW EXPANSION, ;UNPROTECTED TYPE II-B UNPROTECTED NONCOMBUSTIBLE (CHAPTER 6 IBC) NONCOMBUSTIBLE EXISTING MALL BUILDING TO BE DEDICATED: "UNPROTECTED NONCOMBUSTIBLE' _ O OCCUPANCY GROUP PRIMARY OCCUPANCY _ GROUP M INCIDENTAL OCCUPANCY GROUP A3 & GROUP B Q EGRESS AND EXITS DOOR WIDTH IN INCHES (PER IBC CHAPTER 10) 0.15 X OCCUPANT LOAD STAIR WIDTH IN INCHES (PER IBC CHAPTER 10) 0.20 X OCCUPANT LOAD SEE EGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OCCUPANT LO ALCULATIONS AND EXIT WIDTHS O OCCUPANT LOADS SEE EGRESS DRAWINGS FOR OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS AND EXIT WIDTHS O PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING PROMOED (TOTAL W/ H.C.) - _ 6975 PARKING RATIO (PER 1,000 S.F. OF GLA) 4.1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 20 + 1 FOR EVERY 100 OVER 1,000 SPACES 80 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (INCLUDING VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES) __- 94 O FIRE RESISTIVE REQUIREMENTS (THOLE 601 IBC) EXTERIOR WALLS LOAD BEARING 0 HR NON LOAD BEARING - 0 HR INTERIOR PERMANENT PARTITIONS 0 HR DEMISING PARTITIONS 1 HR STRUCTURAL FRAMES COLUMNS AND PRIMARY REAMS __ 0 HR SECONDARY BEAMS — _-0 HR FLOORS, CEILING/FLOOR __ 0 HR ROOF 0 IIR SHAFTS AND STAIR ENCLOSURES AREA TABULATIONS _ �,` 1-HR ^ gm QA' p � DEMOLISHED GLA < 47,883 SO FT < 41,883 SO FT MALL EXPANSION 98,247 Sq FT COMMON MALL 108,804 SO FT O11TP ARCFI S 75, 1( Q0._SQ FT 25 Of10 SO rT _ TOIAL PROPOSED 83,721 SO FT 375,364 SO FT TOTAL EXISTING + PROPOSED GLA 106,173 SO FT KIOSKS 3.201 SO FT TFNANT RGSTROnMC / FOLIIPMFNT RnnMS (_ i%) NET EXISTING + PROPOSED UFA 1,575,405 SO FT COMPLIMENTARY LISE 115,995 SO FT REVISED UFA 1,460,410 SO FT PAW40 PARKING REQUIRED 0 5 SPACES / 1,000 SG FT UFA 7,302 SPACES ALLOWED DEDUCTION OF 4.5$ 329 SPACES REOUIRED PARKING jG973 SPACES] EXISTING PARKING 329 SPACES DISPLACED PARKING (1,559) SPACES NEWARKM 1 57P cPArFC TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING 6.975 SO FT GMMIGN OF BF CALCULAWS BEWTIMN PCTCM 2D M AND_J M UN 24VCT:j GLA LEVEL 1 ADJACENT TO SEARS 48,574 SO FT CIA I FVFI 2 An,IACENT-TILSEAIRS 117HR cn_-EL_ -- TOTAL GLA 82,360 SQ FT GLA LEVEL 1 ADJACENT TO SEARS 46,574 SO FT (:I A I FVFI 2 AD.IA[PNT TO 14"ARC _ .Is 4sn Sa_El _ TOTAL GLA 81,908 SO FT VARIATION (052 SO FT) 9 ARCHITECT 0111 STATE OF MOIII 4SHNG10N Consultants Approvals/Phase: PERMIT/BID ADDENDUM J 0210512007 Key Plan: No. Revision Date ® PLAN CHECK REVISIONS 2006 AUGUST 21 REVISION 'I' ____2006 Sept. 26 A ADDENDUM J 2007 Feb. 5 ^ -, - VLL.VVCODE COMPLIANCE A nqn nvc0 ~ MAK 20►) City A 1 — A 0- — Q -- Sh eet Titl e COVER SHEET RECEIVED FEB - 9 2007 PERMIT CENTEr Job No. Date Scale 11P8 8-15-2005 N/A AO.0-0 It PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: December 18, 2009 APPLICANT: Nicholas Lee RE: D09-237 Bank of America Drive Thru Demo ADDRESS: 225 Tukwila Parkway Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordi ly. If you have any questions on the requested revision, Stacy MacGregor is the planner assigned to the file and can be reac d at 206-433-7166. 1. No permits can be issued until the SEPA addendum is completed. 2. Prior to obtaining final approval on this permit, do one of the following: 1. Record a lot consolidation to include the BofA lot into mall's parent lot. 2. Execute a BSIP to include the BofA site into the BSIP for the mall. 3. Record a covenant parking agreement between yourself and the City per Tukwila Municipal Code 18.56.070.4 3. Determine if needed and obtain a permit from Puget Sound Clean Air Agency for asbestos abatement. I✓ 4. Provide a sheet that overlays the new layout with the existing layout. List the area of the existing landscaping. 5. A landscape plan is required. See TMC 18.52.035.3 & 4 for requirements including a landscape island every 10 stalls. See TMC 18.52.030 for Type I perimeter landscaping requirements. 6. Pedestrian paths shall be raised to give preference and increase safety for pedestrians. Provide a detail of ped paths. 7. Ped paths though the parking area are desired. 8. The ped path from the building to the sidewalk ought to have minimal right angles. Does the ped path/striped cross on the south connect to a crosswalk on the entrance drive aisle? If it doesn't, it ought to be relocated to the west. t ,- 9. The SEPA EIS states that there will be no loss of landscape area and subsequently no loss of wildlife habitat. The City will work with you to preserve the existing trees which do provide habitat but we won't require the areas currently developed as only lawn to be preserved as we recognize their value to wildlife if minimal. a. FYI: Perimeter landscaping can include sidewalks subject to special permission. Decreasing the landscape perimeter areas that do not contain mature trees may allow you to capture additional parking. b. FYI: Perimeter (landscape) averaging may be approved as special permission with one of the criteria being to retain significant trees. TMC 18.52.020B. C. It appears that you may get more stalls using an east -west layout for the parking stalls east of the building. 10. Show arrows (striping) on one way drive aisles (24' drive aisle widths with 8.5' wide stalls is a one-way configuration). 11. The addition of 211 stalls is believed to be sufficient to bring the Mall site into parking compliance. This includes the required 42 stalls for the old bank building. a. I haven't reviewed a parking plan since the 2005 plan submitted as part of design review for the south expansion. Different files have different numbers stating how much parking the Mall has. It appears that this plan will result in an overage of required parking; the need to review a current parking plan can be addressed now or at some time prior to the Mervyn's redevelopment permit issuance. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Numbers E09-017-SEPA LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: M Building 0 Public Works Fire Dept. Project: SEPA for Mall, Old BofA demo (Nicholas Lee/Westfield Northeast Parking Ph 1) Address: 225 Tukwila Py Parcel: 3597000257 Date transmitted: 11/19/09 Response requested by: 12/3/2009 Staff coordinator: Stacy MacGregor Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials asneede Relates to D09-237. This file may become an adendum to the EIS for the mall project but the review will stay the same. id d UrC ec ems , s "-� ly'vklk , PI-aw-check date: Comments prepared Update date: 2 p RECI 1VED City of Tukwila Nov 19 tuus Department of Community Development TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Numbers E09-017-SEPA LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: 0 Building IP ublic Works FE] Fire Dept. Project: SEPA for Mall, Old BofA demo (Nicholas Lee/Westfield Northeast Parking Ph 1) Address: 225 Tukwila Py Parcel: 3597000257 Date transmitted: 11/19/09 Response requested by: 12/3/2009 Staff coordinator: Stacy MacGregor Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials asneede Relates to 1309-237. This file may become an adendum to the EIS for the mall project but the review will stay the same. (ScAd pu � [ c Woyk5 �e Plan check date: Comments prepared by: Update date: City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mmvor Department of Community Development .lack Pace, Director Sent via email to Nicholas Lee at NLEE@us.westfield.com (no hard copy to follow) November 20, 2009 RE: E09-017, E08-021, D09-237 Dear Mr. Lee, I am reviewing the above applications and history for the demolition and redevelopment of the former Bank of America parcel. In 2008, an addendum to the mall's EIS was filed that included a series of planned Phase II development projects including redeveloping the former Bank of America site. According to your email to Moira Bradshaw, dated 11/17/2009 you asked that we not issue that SEPA addendum. Please send me a written request to withdraw your SEPA addendum (E08-021). Since a precedent was already started to include the former Bank of America (BofA) parcel into the mall EIS and the bank parcel is providing parking for the mall itself, it is appropriate to pursue an addendum to the EIS rather than a new SEPA determination. This will potentially shorten the review time on the project because an addendum to the EIS does not require public notice or a comment period. We will review the submitted SEPA checklist dated 11/6/2009 (E09-017) and the determination will be to issue an addendum to the EIS to maintain consistency with our past practices and your intended uses for your site Finally, off -site parking is not a permitted use in the City of Tukwila. The redevelopment of the Bank of America site is to correct the parking deficiency on the mall site. There are three ways to make the parking on this site code compliant. Prior to issuing your demolition and site development permit, one of the following needs to be completed. 1. Record a lot consolidation to include the BofA lot into mall's parent lot. 2. Execute a BSIP to include the BofA site into the BSIP for the mall. 3. Record a covenant parking agreement between yourself and the City per Tukwila Municipal Code 18.56.070. As a reminder, the City does not allow stand-alone parking as a use in the City of Tukwila. If at anytime the entire BofA site is developed for parking without a building or other use on the site, a BSIP or lot consolidation will have to be executed to allow only parking to occur on this site. Sincerely, (signature file) Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Department of Community Development SM Page I of 1 11/20/2009 HAE09-017 D09-237 BoA Demo\20091120.doe 1~La, w� Q# { ��• rM�•••,� 1908 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplannci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW NOV 0 6 2909 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: (�i 0q — Q 1 7 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: WESTFIELD SOUTHCENTER NORTHEAST PARKING LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 225 Tukwila Parkway, Tukwila, WA 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 359700257 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Nicholas Lee; WEA Southcenter LLC Address: 633 Southcenter, Seattle, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 246-0423 FAX: (206) 244-8607 E-mail: Signature: S:\Washnlgton\TUKWILA\Westfield\4reports\SEPA North BofA\TUWF NBofA SEPA Application 090917.doc s RECEIVED Nov 0 6 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: October 15, 2009 Applicant Name: Nicholas Lee; WEA Southcenter LLC Street Address: 633 Soutlicenter, Seattle, WA 98188 City, State, Zip: Seattle, WA 98188 Telephone: �206) 246-0423 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes'' or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. S:\VVasiiijigton\TUKWILA\VVestfield\4i-eports\SEPA North BofA\TU4VF NBofA SEPA Application 090917.doc Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters t11e existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (YES Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter ?4416 Page 18-I5). Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington. Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt d answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. (;� Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 S:A Washington\TUKWILA\Westfield\4reports\SEPA North BofA\TUWF NBofA SEPA Application 090917.doc City of Tukz ESA Screening Checklist Part A (continued 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. — Checklist Complete YE — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high er mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - ontinue to Question 1-4 City of Tuk- ESA Screening Checklist Fart B (continued) 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES -)Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a tercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) S - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) City of Tuku ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross -sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross -sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal City of Tukz ESA Screening Checklist from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments A. BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Westfield Southcenter Northeast Parkin 2. Name of Applicant: Nicholas Lee; WEA Southcenter LLC 3. Date checklist prepared: October 15, 2009 Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase I: To begin as soon as permitted. Demolition of drive through teller structure on east portion of property. Possible relocation of existing bank building. Construction of surface parking lot. Phase II: Timeframe unknown. Possible demolition of existing bank buildin on west portion of property and construction of surface parking lot. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. See phasing above. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. have prepared a geotechnical report for the Westfield Southcenter expansion, dated September 15, 2005. A stormwater technical information report will be prepared. EIS prepared by City of Tukwila regarding the expansion of Southcenter mall dated, October 6, 2004. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. S:\Wasiiiiigtoii\TUKWILA\Westfielci\4reports\SEPA North BofA\TUWF NBofA SEPA Application 09091.doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: List any government approvals or pennits that will be needed for your proposal. City of Tukwila Demolition Permit, Civil Permit, Building Permit, NPDES Construction Permit (Department of Ecology) 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The total property is 2.99 acres in size. Proposed redevelopment for phase one includes the demolition of the approximately 400 SF drive through teller building and associated structure on the east portion of the site. The east portion of the site will be redeveloped into surface parking. The existing approximately 8700 SF bank building on the west portion of the site may be relocated. Phase two may include the demolition of the existinp- bank buildin on the west portion of the site and redevelopment into surface parking. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located on the SW corner of Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West. The address is 225 Tukwila Parkway, Tukwila, WA 98188. Tax lot number: 3597000257 1.2. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one . Flat, •oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 15% slope within landscaping. The rest of the site is generally 0.5% to 3.5% C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Per the geotechical report by Shannon & Wilson, Inc., the site is generally characterized by a surface fill layer of medium dense, sandy silt and silty sand, over areas of estuarine sediments, over alluvial sands and gravels. The surface fill layer is up to 20' thick. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The geotechnical report describes the surface fill layer as not systematically compacted to a specific density. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Phase one of the proposed project will require approximately 400 cubic yards of net fill from offsite. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Exposed soils will have the potential to erosion; however, rainfall landing on exposed soils should not cause significant erosion unless runoff is concentrated and point of discharge of stormwater is over exposed sloped soils. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 80% of the site will be impervious after phase one. Approximately 81 % of the site will be impervious after phase two. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, silt fence, inlet protection silt sack, construction entrances, and watering for dust control will be used where applicable. Following construction, no erosion is anticipated as a result of precipitation or wind, as any remaining exposed soils will be landscaped. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and vehicle emissions may occur during construction. Vehicle emissions will occur once construction is complete. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. Agency Cominents Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction, watering to control dust, as necessary. Following construction, any remaining exposed soils will be landscaped to eliminate the ential for wind erosion. 3 . Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The project site is approximately 125 feet south of Gilliam Creek which flows from west to east, just north of Tukwila Parkway. Gilliam Creek is tributary to the Green River. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Because the project site is located 125 feet from Gilliam Creek, demolition, grading and paving will be done within 200 feet of the creek. No impact to the creek is anticipated, as the work will be contained within the project site. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The proposal does not lie within the 100-year floodplain per the most current FEMA FIRM ma 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn in association with this proiect. Some stormwater will be infiltrated into the ground during construction activities. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None. The existing bank building is served by the public sewer system. No waste material is anticipated to be discharged other than stormwater which will be routed through the public storm sewer system. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The precipitation runoff will be collected from pavement, roof and landscape areas. The runoff will be collected via existing catch basins and storm Diaes to the City of Tukwila storm sewer system. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. There is a limited potential for waste materials, such as automotive fluid drlDs to be collected with stormwater runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Stormwater will be collected and detained within the existing detention and flow control system onsite. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: ald r, maple, s en, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar; pine, other X _ Shrubs X Grass Pasture ----Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 58 6" — 15" maple trees will be removed for phase one and two. Shrubs and grass also will be removed for the project. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Existing trees that can be saved based on the proposed site plan will remain. Following construction, the site will be landscaped to meet the City of Tukwila landscape requirements. Native plants will be incorporated into landscape design as required and as feasible. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eag songbird ther: Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver. other: Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Western Washington is part of the Pacific Flyway; birds that inhabit the area vary seasonallv. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The existing bank building will use all existing utilities including gas for heating and electricity for general energy needs. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No new structures are proposed for the project. Any relocation of the existing bank building would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent orooerties. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No measures are proposed to reduce or control energy impacts. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Asbestos abatement will occur as neccessary in all structures prior to demolition. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services are required for this project. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Asbestos abatement will occur in all structures prior to demolition. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? There will be noise from vehicular traffic on Interstate 405 and traffic around Westfield Southcenter mall; however, this noise is not expected to affect the roiect. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -tern or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short—term noise will be generated by equipment, machinary, and tools during construction. On a long-term basis, it is expected that noise will be erated by automobiles. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short-term noise during construction will be limited to hours of construction permitted by the City of Tukwila. No measures are proposed to reduce or control noise resulting from the completed project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current site consists of a bank branch and drive through banking facility. The adjacent property is Westfield Southcenter mall, which is a commercial retail use. Adajacent properties across Andover Park West are also commercial retail uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in the last 35 years. Earliest aerial photo available, 1973, shows a portion of the property developed and a portion cleared. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: C. Describe any structures on the site. An existing —8700 SF on story bank building and a —400 SF one story drive through teller structure. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The drive through teller building will be demolished under phase one The bank building may be demolished or relocated under Dhase two. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? City of Tukwila zoned: TUC, Tukwila Urban Center f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? City of Tukwila comprehensive plan designation: TUC, Tukwila Urban Center. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Up to 20 full-time equivalent employees are expected to be employed if the existing building is redeveloped. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No people will be displaced by the completed project as the existing building is currently vacant. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The site will be developed according to zoning and site development standards required by the TUC zone and/or as approved by the City of Tukwila. The proposed usage is similar in nature to the surrounding sites. 9. Housing a_ Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No new structures are proposed on the property for phase one. If relocated during phase two, the relocated bank building would not exceed height requirements of the TUC zone. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will be landscaped, as required, to meet City of Tukwila design criteria. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from parking lot lighting and building lighting are included in the proposed site plan. Off -site glare from lighting is not expected. The lighting would occur from dusk until dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Light or glare from the finished project should not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off -site sources of light include street lighting along Tukwila Parkway and Andover Park West and parking lot lighting from Westfield Southcenter to the south and west. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: On -site lighting will be designed so as not to create off -site glare or create potential safety hazards. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The project site is located adjacent to Westfield Southcenter mall. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known at this time. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A; no impacts are anticipated. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently served by an existing driveway from Tukwila Parkway and by a mall access drive from Andover Park West. Under the proposed site plan, the driveway from Tukwila Parkway will be removed and two access points will be provided from the existing mall access drive b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is currently served by King County Metro route 150, which has a sto directly adiacent to the site at the corner of Andover Park West and Tukwila Parkw C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed phase one would have 253 parking stalls, of which 7 would be accessible parking stalls. 74 of the 79 existing parking stalls will be removed and replaced for phase one. Phase two would have up to 355 parking stalls and would remove and replace all of the existing stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Neither phase of the project proposes street improvements besides the removal of two existing driveways and the addition of curb and sidewalk in the area of removal. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The proposed project will not use water, rail, or air transportation as part of the proposed redevelopment. Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No additional vehicular trips will be generated by the completed project. The demolition of the existing structures will result in a net loss of trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a_ Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will require police, fire, and medical services typically associated with commercial development. However, the site will be of similar use as existing, and an increase in these services is not anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricit , atural ga ater efuse servic , telephon anitary sew , septic system other: Stormwater runoff convevance system Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. For demolition and construction of surfacing parking lot, only electrical service for light poles is required. Connection to existing Puget Sound Energy electrical service onsite will be used. For relocation of existing building, electricity and natural gas (by PSE), water, refuse service, sanitary sewer, and stormwater (by City of Tukwila), and telephone (by Qwest) are currently available onsite and would be connected to the relocated structure. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to Lake its decision. Signature: :„,/ Date Submitted: kl 1 ` ! o, (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). Agency Comments �Jt;�wgs CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development RECEIVED I GGi 6300 Southeenter Boulevard, Tukivila, WA 98188 Q i O Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 NOV 0 6 2009 �l E-mail: tukplan(a,ci.tukwila.wa.us COMMUNITY ' J 1908 DEVELOPMENT AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I have been authorized by the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application to make the following statements on behalf of the owner. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers; contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 225 Tukwila Parkway, Tukwila, WA 98188 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at Tj L.n (city), W h (state), on 6 , 200T Print Name ��L 4�e..�.i L"Ce Address %33 zm,,-y Kcz,.rmrt— -'C, z- .,.,� Phone Number Signature On this day perso 1t� before me �11[�tq,I 6 Ili to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument anc�i�lk11-c vl� g � /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSC1,i$it F VRmf1 �T' do ME ON THIS DAY OF LloyN 2004 •. i '• U =� NOTARY m=A, Q : PUBUG dos NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Stat of Washington • Z •� �i�,9f� •6,��5/2�1 ����,r��` residing at .�l 0 , WA — ' OW My Commission expires on_ 051.011 S:\Washington\TUKWILA\Westfield\4reports\SEPA North BofA\TUWF NBofA SEPA Application 090917.doc CITY OF TUKWILA 3 } H- Z s INTERSTATE-405 00 z cn TUKWILA PARKWAY W n n �- Ofw Q f— c D, � o � w m z � W z � � w w w = o 0 o 0 z z z x PROJECT LOCATION STRANDER BLVD 0 z / 3 0 0 N OJ VICINITY MAP 3. RECEIVE N.T.S. o o, NOV 0 6 200 N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WESTFIELD ®� I nk, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP 1505 Westlake Ave. N. T (206)522-951 Sufte 305 F (206) 5J22��-�83 NTS 9/25/09 Seattle, WA 98109 .. PACLAND. S�►� t L � (� �C? 7 '�_ 3`s9Tao6z2A l 3587000222 I J �,rN. Li J N O m i L CD 0 Q3591000245 3597000216 9202470010 fic� 2AU6 w� county � '+1110032A0073 �T 00032,00004 3S97000282 OdO3200003 > _ y\ Ob03200005 000320dOtt,�t 000320960 r 0003200022_. 0003200021 359700025 - 359TOW257 Tukwila C+j'_3iXSS� 02230 om 0223=30 J _ -I -- --f 0223900M0 !j 0223100032 0223100031 0223100031 1 0 82I1 1 RECEIVED NOV 0 6 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT j WESTFIELD ©® TUKWILA, WASHINGTON EXHIBIT B i505WestlakeAve. N. T (206)522a51 500 BUFFER PARCEL MAP Suite 305 F (2d Pj 522 e3�t' NTS 9/25/09 Seattle, WA 98109 wmv.P�tium a R Print Map Page Pagel of 2 LQ King County II 500' Buffer Parcel Map and Data II ILI 3597000282 `�4 00032000� 000320i70a7 � 0003200090 Tr _ f�0032Uli022. F 3597000257 1002A5 Tukwila 0223000040 0223000020 iJ 3597000246 9202470010 0223100010 0223000030 {C}200814nffCaumy 11! I ' 0�ggf{ Parcel Number 3597000257 Address 225 TUKWILA PKWY Zipcode 98188 Taxpayer WEA SOUTHCENTER LLC 'he information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change " (� E IVED iithout notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or ghts to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential � ,r O 6 200 amages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on thi Y 9 iap. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." r Parcel Number 0003200003 Parcel Number 0003200005 Address 6400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Address 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Zipcode 98188 Zipcode 98188 Taxpayer MSI 6400 TUKWILA Taxpayer TUKWILA CITY OF Parcel Number 0003200021 Parcel Number 0223000010 Address 500 TUKWILA PKWY Address 301 TUKWILA PKWY Zipcode 98188 Zipcode 98188 Taxpayer SEATTLE CITY OF Taxpayer BETA HOLDINGS LTD Parcel Number 0223000020 Parcel Number 0223100020 littp://www5.kingcounty.gov/parcelviewer/Print Process.asp 9/23/2009 1 Print Map Page Page 2 of 2 Address Zipcode Taxpayer 100 ANDOVER PARK W 98188 OPEN FRAME LLC Address Zipcode Taxpayer OPEN FRAME LLC Parcel Number 3597000245 Parcel Number 3597000246 Address Address 500 SOUTHCENTER MALL Zipcode Zipcode 98188 Taxpayer WESTFIELD PROPERTY FEDERATED DEPT TAX DEPT Taxpayer STORES INC Parcel Number 3597000282 Parcel Number 9202470010 Address 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Address Zipcode 98188 Zipcode Taxpayer TUKWILA CITY OF Taxpayer King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.kingeounty.gov/parcelviewer/Print Process.asp 9/23/2009 Print Map Page Pagel of 2 kg King County 500' Buffer Parcel Map and Data y �__ 354iA0022A pq� � t0003200013 �- y`3547000222 p 0003200004 3597000282 ��� t � A0032AUU03 _ 0003200022. �� -- TUMILAPKi4'X 3597000V257� - - -- =yam — l� iP r 35970002S7 I 3597000245 Tukwila 0223000010 t t 4 3597000246 o i ' 022300DO20 �-� 9202470010 022310DD20 022310DO10 0223000030 {C�200814ngCaunty� R 1 T 0�82f� Parcel Number 3597000257 Address 225 TUKWILA PKWY Zipcode 98188 n 71 ����� Taxpayer WEA SOUTHCENTER LLC The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change �" 0 C V �oo(j without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or � Y a rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential COMMUNITY damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this EVELOPMENT map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." Parcel Number 0003200003 Parcel Number 0003200005 Address 6400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Address 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Zipcode 98188 Zipcode 98188 Taxpayer MSI 6400 TUKWILA Taxpayer TUKWILA CITY OF Parcel Number 0003200021 Parcel Number 0223000010 Address 500 TUKWILA PKWY Address 301 TUKWILA PKWY Zipcode 98188 Zipcode 98188 Taxpayer SEATTLE CITY OF Taxpayer BETA HOLDINGS LTD Parcel Number 0223000020 Parcel Number 0223100020 http://www5.kingcounty.gov/pareelviewer/Print Process.asp 9/23/2009 r ' Print Map Page Page 2 of 2 Address Zipcode Taxpayer 100 ANDOVER PARK W 98188 OPEN FRAME LLC Address Zipcode Taxpayer OPEN FRAME LLC Parcel Number 3597000245 Parcel Number 3597000246 Address Address 500 SOUTHCENTER MALL Zipcode Zipcode 98188 Taxpayer WESTFIELD PROPERTY FEDERATED DEPT TAX DEPT Taxpayer STORES INC Parcel Number 3597000282 Parcel Number 9202470010 Address 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Address Zipcode 98188 Zipcode Taxpayer TUKWILA CITY OF Taxpayer King County_ I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments ( Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.kingcounty.gov/parcelviewer/Print Process.asp 9/23/2009 14A, w City of Tukwila o; y Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 1= Tukwila, Washington 98188 ""r ` Phone: 206-431-3670 ' f Fax: 206-431-3665 1908~ Web site: http:11www.ci.tukwi1a.wa.us RECEIPT Parcel No.: 3597000257 Permit Number: E09-017 Address: 225 TUKWILA PY TUKW Status: PENDING Suite No: Applied Date: 11/06/2009 Applicant: LEE, NICHOLAS Issue Date: Receipt No.: R09-01761 Payment Amount: $1,200.00 Initials: CPL Payment Date: 11/06/2009 03:57 PM User ID: 1661 Balance: $0.00 Payee: PAYMENT OF FEE FOR SEPA - CHECK COVERS OTHER FEES TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Descriptio Amount ---------- ----------- ---------- ------------ Payment Check 626045 1,200.00 Authorization No. ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Account Code Current Pmts ------------------------------------------------------------------ MAPS/PUBLIC/MAILING 000.341.500 200.00 SEPA 000,345.831 1,000.00 Total: $1,200.00 PAYMENT Ro-'-' E Co F. IV ED doc: Receipt-06 Printed: 11-06-2009 .a