Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIC 2020-08-17 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Transportation and Infrastructure Committee ❖ Cynthia Delostrinos Johnson, Chair •'• Verna Seal ❖ Kate Kruller AGENDA Distribution: City Attorney (email) C. Delostrinos A. Youn Johnson (email) Clerk File Copy V. Seal 2 Extra K. Kruller K. Hougardy(email) Place pkt pdf on SharePoir D. Quinn Z Trans & Infra Agendas L. Humphrey H. Ponnekanti email cover to: F. Ayala, H. Kirkland A. Le, C. O'Flaherty, A. G. Labanara Youn, B. Saxton, S. Norris, B. Still (email) L. Humphrey MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2020 - 5:30 PM Virtual Meeting - Members of the public may listen by dialing 1-253-292-9750 and entering conference ID 741 081 059# (6300 BUILDING, SUITE ) Item Recommended Action Page 1. PRESENTATIONS 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) a) Discussion Pg. 1 Grant Application (Alison Turner) Committee Approval b) Ordinance and Public Works Fee Resolution b) Forward to September 14, 2020 Pg. 7 Concurrency Management Update (Cyndy Knighton) Committee of the Whole c) Waste Management Annual Curbside Collection c) Discussion only Pg. 25 Follow-up Report (Han Kirkland) d) Public Safety Plan — Public Works Shops d) Discussion only Pg. 29 History — Part 1 of 2 (Hari Ponnekanti) 3. MISCELLANEOUS Future Agendas: • 42nd Ave S. Bridge Replacement — 30% Design • 42nd Ave S. Bridge In -Depth Report • Pavement Mgmt Report • 2019 Small Drainage Closeout Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, September 21, 2020 SThe City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance. City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Jack Pace, Department of Community Development BY: Alison Turner, Sustainable Transportation Program Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 11, 2020 SUBJECT: TDM Regional Mobility Grant Application ISSUE The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program is asking for approval to apply for a WSDOT Regional Mobility Grant. BACKGROUND The TDM Program was awarded and is currently administering a July 2019 — June 2021 Regional Mobility Grant (RMG). A new funding award will enable the TDM Program to continue providing regional TDM services in Tukwila and partner cities in South King County including Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Renton and SeaTac. DISCUSSION The scope of the proposed 4-year (July 2021 — June 2025) $840,000 project is to provide TDM programming and services to employers, residents, commuters and visitors in Tukwila and partner cities to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality in South King County. By providing transportation information, resources and incentives, the project will encourage a mode shift away from driving alone and increase the use of transit, carpooling, active transportation, telecommuting, and new mobility services. FINANCIAL IMPACT There will be no impact to the general fund. Local match (20% of the project budget, $168,000) will be provided by the City's TDM Allocation (formerly called Commute Trip Reduction) plus funding from a federal 2023-2024 CMAQ grant and/or local in -kind funding from the Port of Seattle or King County Metro should there be any. If for some reason this funding does not get secured, the total project amount could be reduced to $742,050 so that the match requirement can be fulfilled by the secured TDM Allocation funds alone. RECOMMENDATION Committee decision to apply for the grant. ATTACHMENT Tukwila TDM Concept.pdf :Ti WSDOT APRIL 2020 2021-2023 Regional Mobility Grant program CONCEPT Purpose The Regional Mobility Grant Program supports local efforts to improve connectivity between counties and regional population centers, and reduce transportation delay. This program is supported exclusively by state funding. The program funds: • New transit services • Park and ride lots • Transportation demand management programs • Transit speed and reliability improvements • New buses • Transit service expansion Eligibility Cities, counties, ports, and transit agencies in Washington state. Pre -application requirement To apply for a 2021-2023 Regional Mobility Grant, you must first submit a concept. WSDOT engineers and transportation demand management experts will review your concept. Only reviewed concepts may apply for a grant. Instructions To submit a concept: 1. Save a copy of this form to your computer. 2. Answer all questions. 3. Send the completed form to PTDGrants@wsdot.wa.gov, subject line "Regional Mobility Grant Concept." Technical questions Jeff Petterson, Jeff.petterson@wsdot.wa.gov or 360-705-7917 Grant application questions Evan Olsen, Evan.olsen@wsdot.wa.gov or 360-705-6929 011 Organization name Contact name Contact title Address Email Phone number Provide a brief description of your concept. Cost estimate for this concept. Estimated request from the Regional Mobility Grant Program. Type of concept (check all that apply) Operating Construction Equipment/Vehicles Z Transportation Demand Management Estimated percent of concept 3 Describe the transportation performance problems that your concept aims to address. In your response: • Use WSDOT's corridor sketch summary viewer to identify the corridor numbers your concept affects. If your concept does not use the state highway system, identify communities or activity centers your concept affects. • Use WSDOT's application for local planning and community accessibility tool, or a program with equal functionality, to identify underserved, socioeconomically disadvantaged, rural, and other priority populations your concept affects. • Note any local, regional, or statewide plans that identify your concept and how they describe your concept's design. • If your metropolitan or regional planning organizations have congestion mitigation plans, summarize the plans and how your concept affects the plans. Identify and describe the strategies your concept uses to help solve the transportation performance problems you identified above. In your response, use WSDOT's transportation systems management and operations planning and implementation website to identify strategies. 2 Identify any representatives from cities, counties, metropolitan or regional planning organizations, transits, tribes, and Washington State Ferries that you have recently collaborated with on your concept. Identify any WSDOT regional staff that you have collaborated with in the past 18 months on your concept. Include staff name and WSDOT region (i.e., Eastern, North Central, Northwest, Olympic, South Central, Southwest). Describe any positive and/or negative effects your concept has on other organizations or modes (e.g. metropolitan planning organizations, regional transportation planning organizations, local jurisdictions, transportation service providers). J Describe any environmental, cultural, historical, or archaeological concerns for your concept. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information: This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at wsdotada@wsdot.wa.gov or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA(4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Title VI Notice to Public: It is the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO's Title VI Coordinator at (369 705-7090. 20-04-0114 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Pub tic Works Department - }Mari Ponnekanti, Inteda; Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM To: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee From: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director By: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg Date: August 14, 2020 Subject: Concurrence Updates: Public Works Fee Resolution for Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Rates and Ordinance Modifying TMC 9.50 — Concurrency Management ISSUE Adopt updates to the City's Concurrency Management system via a resolution establishing a new Public Works Fee Schedule for 2020 and an ordinance amending certain sections of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 9.50 — Concurrency Management. Concurrency Management is the method used to ensure that necessary facilities are available concurrent with new development within the City. BACKGROUND In December 2005, the City established a concurrency management system, adopted via ordinance 2110 and codified in TMC Chapter 9.50, and implemented a concurrency test fee adopted via resolution as part of the Public Works Fee Schedule. Passing a concurrency test and obtaining a concurrency certificate are required of all new development and redevelopment. This test and certificate both verify that the necessary concurrency capacity is available and reserves it for the proposed development. The Public Works Fee Schedule has been updated on a routine basis to establish the amounts for certain fees and charges incurred during the development review and permit approval process. The Public Works Fee Schedule was last updated in 2018 with Resolution 1945. Fees were updated for water, sewer and surface water fees for 2019 and 2020 rates. Transportation Concurrency Test Fees were not updated at that time. The concurrency test fee is charged to offset the costs incurred by Tukwila for maintaining the City's traffic model, periodic short-term updates to the model, and major model updates required for the Transportation Element updates. DISCUSSION The City has been administering the Concurrency Management system since January 2006 and daily practices of implementation have been well established. Upon reviewing the code language in TMC 9.50 and comparing it to actual implementation, it was found that the best practice for Tukwila was not reflected in the codified language. The original language was modeled after a much larger city's program and included more steps than have been found to be necessary for Tukwila's permit process. The proposed changes simplify Tukwila's Concurrency Management system to better reflect the current practice. As part of the effort updating the Traffic Impact Fees and verification that the City's street network remains in compliance with the established Level of Service Standards in 2019 (often referred to as "concurrency"), Transportation Concurrency Test Fees were analyzed. The fees were established in 2007 and have not been updated since. Revisions to the fees were recommended to ensure adequate funding is maintained. Additionally, clarification to the fees to include more land use types was included as well as addressing instances where the fees were not reflective of the general impacts to the roadway infrastructure. The new fees more equitably charge developments based on their impacts to the transportation network and are based on a median trip generation rate for each land use group, adjusted for size of development, multiplied by $250 per generated trip (rounded). C:1Usersljennifer-r\AppData\LocallMicrosoftlWindowsllNetCachelContent.OutlooklTRA6ZJW8\INFORMATION MEMO - Concurrency Management Update 2020 (002).docx INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to consider the City's 2020 concurrency test fee increases in accordance with the Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution and proposed modifications to TMC 9.50 in accordance with the attached Ordinance at a public hearing on the August 24, 2020 Committee of the Whole and the September 14, 2020 Special Meeting Consent Agenda. ATTACHMENT • Draft Ordinance • Draft Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution C:\Users\jennifer-r\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content. Outlook\TRA6ZJW8\INFORMATION MEMO - Concurrency Management Update 2020 (002).docx 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 2110 AND 2155, AS CODIFIED AS CHAPTER 9.50, "CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT;" REENACTING TMC CHAPTER 9.50 TO AMEND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONCURRENCY TESTING; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City established concurrency management in 2005 to ensure that concurrency infrastructure was in place prior to approval of new development permits; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend information relating to concurrency testing to better reflect actual processes used; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Repealer. Ordinance Nos. 2155 and 2110, as codified as Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 9.50, "Concurrency Management," are hereby repealed. Section 2. TMC Chapter 9.50 Reenacted. TMC Chapter 9.50 is hereby re-enacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Sections: 9.50.010 Purpose 9.50.020 Definitions 9.50.030 Concurrency Test 9.50.040 Test Criteria 9.50.050 Concurrency for Phased Development 9.50.07-0060 Exemptions W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 1 of 11 9 9.50.080070 Vesting 9.50.0-99080 Improvements to Concurrency Facilities 9.50.4-G0090 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program 9.50.440100 Intergovernmental Coordination 9.50.420110 Administrative Rules and Procedures 9.50.4-0120 Appeals 9.50.440130 SEPA Exemption Section 3. TMC Section 9.50.010 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.010 Purpose A. Pursuant to the State Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, after the adoption of its Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila is required by RCW 36.70A.070(6)tLbjto ensure that transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are provided concurrent with the development. Further, the City is bound by the planning goals of RCW 36.70A.020 to ensure that public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards, hereinafter "concurrency." B. The intent of this chapter is to establish a concurrency management system to ensure that concurrency facilities and services needed to maintain minimum level of service standards can be provided simultaneous to, or within a reasonable time after, development occupancy or use. Concurrency facilities adopted by the City's Comprehensive Plan are roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water management. This chapter furthers the goals, policies and implementation strategies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. C. The concurrency management system provides the necessary regulatory mechanism for evaluating requests for development to ensure that adequate concurrency facilities can be provided within a reasonable time of the development impact. The concurrency management system also provides a framework for determining facilities and services needs and provides a basis for meeting those needs through capital facilities planning. D. For water, sewer, and surface water, the facilities must be in place at the time of development in4pac[ approval; and for roads, the facilities must be in place within six years of the time of the development ima�proval. Applicants with developments that would cause the level of service on concurrency facilities to decline below City standards can have their developments approved by implementing measures that offset their impacts and would maintain the City's standard for level of service. Section 4. TMC Section 9.50.020 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.020 Definitions. The definitions contained in TMC 9.50.020 apply throughout this chapter unless, from the context, another meaning is clearly intended. W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 2 of 11 10 1. 'Adequate" means equal to or better than the level of service standards specified in the current adopted capital facilities element. 2. "Applicant" means a person who applies for any certificate of concurrency under this chapter and who is the owner of the subject property or the authorized agent of the property. 3. "Available water, sewer, and surface water capacity" means there is adequate capacity, based on adopted level of service standards, for water, sewer, and surface water facilities currently existing without requiring facility construction, expansion, or modification. 4. "Building permit" refers to any permit issued under the Uniform Building Code. 5. "Certificate of concurrency" means the statement accompanying the Public Works Department's development standards that are issued with an approved development permit or the Public Works Department's conditions of approval that are issued with an approved building permit. The statement shall state that a certificate of concurrency is issued and indicate: a. For water, sewer, and surface water, the capacity of the concurrency facilities that are available and reserved for the specific uses, densities and intensities as described in the development permit or building permit; and b. For road facilities assigned to the development for the specific uses, densities and intensities as described in the development permit or building permit; and c. Conditions of approval, if applicable; and d. An effective date; and e. An expiration date. 6. "Concurrency" means facilities or strategies that achieve the City's level of service standards and that: a. For water, sewer, surface water, and roads: facilities that exist at the time development is approved by the Public Works Department; or b. For roads: (1) Are included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan at the time development is approved by the Public Works Department; or (2) Will be available and complete no later than six years after completion of the development, and the applicant and/or the City provides a financial commitment which is in place at the time the development is approved by the Public Works Department. 7. "Concurrency facilities" means facilities for which concurrency is required in accordance with the provision of this chapter. They are roads, water, sanitary sewer, and surface water facilities. 8. "Concurrency test" means: a. For water, sewer, and surface water, the comparison of a development's demand to the available capacity of each concurrency facility; and W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 3 of 11 11 b. For roads, the comparison of the development's impact on the level of service standards of each effected subarea. A concurrency test must be passed for water, sewer, Ge water, and roads, and a notice issued by the Public Works Department in order to obtain a certificate of concurrency. . 9. "Development permit" means a land use permit and includes short plat, preliminary or final rezone/reclassification, zoning permit, master plan, shoreline substantial development permit/conditional use permit, planned unit development, or any other permit or approval under the Zoning Code or Subdivision Code or Shoreline Master Program. 10. "Financial commitment" means: a. Revenue sources anticipated to be available and designated for facilities in the Comprehensive Plan; b. Unanticipated revenue from federal and state grants for which the City has received notice of approval; c. Funding that is assured by the applicant in a form approved by the Public Works Department. 11. "Level of service standard" means those standards specified in the adopted transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. For water, sewer, and surface water, "level of service standard" also means those standards defined in TMC Title 14. 12. "Non -City managed facilities" include any non -city provider of water or sewer. 13. "Planned capacity" means road facilities that do not exist but for which the necessary facility construction, expansion, or modification project is contained in the current capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. The improvements must be scheduled to be completed within six years and the financial commitment must be in place at the time of approval of the certificate of concurrency to complete the improvements within six years. 14. "Public Works Department" means the Public Works Director or designee will pe ferm the GGRG FFeRGY }oo} 15. "Transportation strategies" means transportation demand management strategies and other techniques or programs that reduce single occupant vehicle travel. 16. "Vested" means the right to develop or continue development in accordance with the laws, rules, and other regulations in effect at the time the building permit application is deemed complete. Section 5. TMC Section 9.50.030 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.030 Concurrency Test A. Timing. All applicants must apply for the transportatio, concurrency test and receive notice of passing the test before the City will Gs;der_approve an application for any development permit or building permit to be ^^m^lete. An application for a concurrencv test may be submitted with other development submittals. W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 4 of 11 12 B. Procedures. 1. Applications for a concurrency test shall be submitted on forms provided by the Public Works Department. The concurrency test shall be done in order of "first in, first out," once the Public Works Department determines the application is complete. 2. The applicant shall be responsible to provide to the Public Works Department a certificate of availability for water and sewer with the GenGUFFeRGY application submittal if the property is serviced by a non -City managed utility. For City managed utilities, a determination will be made on availability and a certificate of availability shall be issued. This certificate of availability shall suffice as meeting the concurrency test for water and sewer utilities. 3. The applicant shall submit a detailed project description of the development, including location, vehicular circulation, and gross floor area by use, as part of the concurrency application and shall pay the concurrency test fee as adopted by motion or resolution of the Tukwila City Council. 4. A concurrency test shall be performed only for specific property, uses, densities and intensities based on the information provided by the applicant. The applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are consistent with the uses allowed for the property. If the concurrency test is being requested in conjunction with an application for rezone, the applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are consistent with the proposed zoning for the property. Changes to the uses, densities and intensities that create additional impacts on concurrency facilities shall be subject to an additional concurrency test. 5. The Public Works Director or designee shall perform the concurrency test. The project must FeG8i„o a p_aGGiRg rvFade pass the concurrency test prior to approval of the development permit or building permit. 6. The Public Works Director or #ie-designees shall notify the applicant of the test results in writing and shall notify other city departments of the test rocs Alt . The date of written notification to the applicant shall be the date of issuance of the concurrency test ,, Ge certificate. 7. The concurrency test netiGe certificate shall expire within 90 nolondar days one year of its issuance unless the applicant submits a building permit application, a SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation pursuant to TMC Chapter 21.04, or an extension is granted within one year from the date of issuance of the concurrency certificate. teplether with the site plan,the traff,iG impaG+ analysis PFepared exteRsions may be graRted for submittal of a complete SEPA environMeRtal GheGkIist and all required dOG imontation 8. If the deadline for submittal of a complete building permit application, SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation is met as described in TMC Section 9.50.030.B.7, or other submittal as determined by the Public Works Director or designee, the concurrency testRGtiGeshall be valid for ene -wo years from the a i date of issuance of the Gonnrronn�i teat n„ti, o building permit, SEPA Determination, or W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 5 of 11 13 other City -issued approval. If the building permit, SEPA environmental checklist, or other submittal is withdrawn by the applicant prior to approval by the City or expires, the concurrencv certificate shall expire one vear after the date of issuance. 409. An applicant must apply for a new concurrency test if the netiGe certificate expires or an extension is not granted. 4410. The Public Works Director may approve an extension of up to one year if: a. The applicant submits a letter in writing requesting the extension before the expiration date. The applicant must show that he/�-isthey are not responsible for the delay inSU„g t#e—ei#+ea+o Of nennUrronni obtaining a building permit, SEPA approval, or other City -issued approval, and has acted in good faith to obtain a Ger+ifiGate the permit or approval; and b. If the property is serviced by a non -City managed utility, then the applicant must submit a letter from the utility approving the extension before the expiration date. �.�r....... ram....._ �. ..��.... �..... ZJ r-....._ .- ` F-r.-.-M, _..- building permit for the deyelepmon+ 4-311. The Public Works Department shall be responsible for accumulating the impacts created by each application and removing any impacts from the City's concurrency records for an expired concurrency test nett'Ge certificate, an expired development permit or building permit, a dion„n+iRued nor+ifinor other action resulting in an applicant no longer causing impacts `"'hamthat have been accounted for in the City records. 4412. The Public Works Department shall be responsible to coordinate with applicable non -City managed utility operators for maintenance and monitoring of available and planned capacity for these utilities. 4-513. A certificate of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land use, density and intensity described in the application for a development permit or building permit. No development shall be required to obtain more than one certificate of concurrency for each building, unless the applicant or subsequent owner proposes changes or modifications to the property location, density, intensity, or land use that creates additional impacts on concurrency facilities. 14. A certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 6 of 11 14 Section 6. TMC Section 9.50.040 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.040 Test Criteria Development applications that would result in a level of service reduction below the established -adopted standard shall not be approved. Cnr petabin water and sanitary cn,e,or available systern GapaGity will be used on GenduGting the GonGUrrenGy test. For SurfaGe will be used in Gond ,ntinn Oho nn IG ,rrenGy test 1. For water, and sanitary sewer,, and the suFfaGe water conveyance systems, a certificate of availability must be issued to pass the concurrency test. if the GapaGit„ of the GapaGity required to maintain the established level of serviGe standard, then the GenGUrrenc-y test i passed. IndtiE)R-,-f9f For surface water conveyance systems, the water quality and detention standards described in the 1996-currently-adopted King County Surface Water Design Manual must be met to pass the concurrency test. 2. For roads, the concurrency test compares level of service at intersections or corridors, as defined in the transportation element, both with and without the development at a time 6 years after the estimated occupancy of the development. If the level of service is equal to or better than the level of service standard, the concurrency test is passed. 3. If the concurrency test is not passed for water, sewer, surface water, or roads, then the applicant may retest for concurrency after doing one or both of the following: a. Modifying the application to reduce the need for the non-existent concurrency facilities. Reduction of need can be through the reduction of the size of the development, reduction of trips generated by original proposed development, or phasing of the development to match future concurrency facility construction; or b. Arranging to fund the improvements for the additional capacity required for the concurrency facilities, as approved by the Public Works Director. Section 7. TMC Section 9.50.050 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.050 Concurrency for Phased Development A. An applicant may request concurrency for a phased development if the Public Works Director determines that the two criteria described in TMC Section 9.50.050.13 are met. The application for concurrency must be accompanied by a schedule for construction of the buildings, parking and other improvements and by a written request for the development to be considered in phases. B. The Public Works Director or ha s-designee may approve concurrency for phased development if both of the following criteria are met: 1. No associated development permit is required before building permit applications can be submitted; and 2. The application is for an integrated development site plan with multiple buildings that are interdependent for vehicular and pedestrian access and parking. W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 7 of 11 15 C. A concurrency application for phased development shall follow the same timing and procedure as set forth in this chapter, except that: 1. Only one concurrency test notice -certificate shall be issued for all buildings proposed for phased development; Z Eanh building approved for phased development shall he issued a nertifinate OOTEerp'rGHarr t the same time as the b iilldiRg Permit• e The concurrency tes�t;GtiGecertificate for an approved phased development shall be valid for five years from the date of its issuance; provided that a ceTRfieate of EeeGUrreRGyy-building permit is issued for a building within one year of the date of issuance of the concurrency test netiGe certificate or within two years if an extension is timely requested and the request is granted. D. The Public Works Director or h-is-designee may approve an extension of up to one year for obtaining -of the fibconcurrency certificate aR d the final GeFtifinate of nenni 1rrenn., for the phased development, consistent with the terms of this chapter. E. In no case shall the concurrency testRetiGe certificate be valid for more than six years from the date of issuance of thenGttGG certificate. The applicant must apply for a new concurrency test for any building approved for phased development that has not been issued a building permit within six years from the date of issuance of the concurrency test netiGe certificate. Section 8. The Tukwila Municipal Code section entitled, "Public Notice of Concurrency Test," as codified at TMC Section 9.50.060, is hereby deleted in its entirety. P b"G Notoce of Co Test > the Gityfile RumbeF, the addFess and rdesnriptien of the rdeyelopment anrd the Prene2di Tres fer filing an appeal Section 9. TMC Section 9.50.060 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.070060 Exemptions The reqUirement fer a nenni IrrenGy test hall net apply to Applications for single-family dwelling unit building permits, multi -family building permits for projects containing four or fewer units, short plats, er-any non-residential project that is categorically exempt from SEPA pursuant to TMC Section 21.04.080, .100, or .110-1 or any other project that will generate less than 30 net new P.M. peak hour trips shall be considered as exempt from meeting concurrency requirements and shall be automatically granted a concurrency certificate. The applicant is required to submit for a concurrency certificate, along with the associated fee, but is not subject to receiving a passing grade in order to obtain other development approvals. The P blin VVE) is Department shall also waive GE)FnplianGe feF atr�c W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 8 of 11 16 Section 10. TMC Section 9.50.070 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50. 10070 Vesting Applicants shall be vested under the laws, rules and other regulations in effect prior to the effective date of this chapter if they have, prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter: 1. Submitted a building permit application that the City has deemed complete; or 2. Entered into formal negotiations with the City for a development agreement in accordance with RCW 36.7013.170 through 36.70B.210; or 3. Have a signed agreement with the City that is still in effect. Section 11. TMC Section 9.50.080 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.090080 Improvements to Concurrency Facilities A. The City shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, adequate facilities through construction of needed capital improvements in implementing strategies which do the following: 1. Achieve level of service standards for anticipated future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development and building permits; and 2. Repair or replace obsolete or deteriorating facilities. B. Improvements to the facilities shall be consistent with the Transportation Element, Utilities Element and Capital Improvement Program of the Comprehensive Plan. Section 12. TMC Section 9.50.090 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50. Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program The City shall include in the capital appropriations of its budget for expenditure during the appropriate fiscal year financial commitments for all capital improvement projects required for iaoptea level of service standards, except the City may omit from its budget any capital improvements for which a binding agreement has been executed with another party to provide the same project in the same fiscal year. W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 9 of 11 17 Section 13. TMC Section 9.50.100 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.440100 Intergovernmental Coordination A. The City may enter into agreements with other local governments, applicable non - City managed utilities, King County, the state of Washington, and other facility providers to coordinate the imposition of level of service standards and other mitigations for concurrency. B. The City may apply standards and mitigations to development in the City that impacts other local jurisdictions. The City may agree to accept and implement conditions and mitigations that are imposed by other jurisdictions on development in their jurisdiction that impact the City. Section 14. TMC Section 9.50.110 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.420110 Administrative Rules and Procedures The Public Works Department shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the concurrency test system. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and issuance of the concurrency test RetiGe and the certificate of concurrency. Section 15. TMC Section 9.50.120 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.M120 Appeals A. Procedures. The applicant may appeal the results of the concurrency test based on three grounds: A technical error; 2. The applicant provided alternative data or a traffic mitigation plan that was rejected by the City; or 3. Delay in review and approval caused solely by the City that allowed capacity to be given to another applicant. The applicant must file a notice of appeal with the Public Works Department within 15 days of the notification of the test results. The notice of appeal must specify the grounds thereof, and must be submitted on the form authorized by the Public Works Department. Each appeal must be submitted with the appeal fee set forth in TMC Section 48.198.02018.90.010. B. Hearing Schedule and Notification. When the appeal has been filed within the time prescribed, in proper form, with the appropriate data and payment of the required fee, the Public Works Department shall transmit the appeal to the hearing examiner for scheduling. Notice of the public hearing shall be given to the applicant at least 15 days prior to the hearing date. W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 10 of 11 18 C. Record. The Public Works Department shall transmit to the Hearing Examiner all papers, calculations, plans and other materials constituting the record of the concurrency test, at least 7 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. The Examiner shall consider the appeal upon the record transmitted, supplemented by any additional competent evidence, which the parties in interest may desire to submit. D. Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the appellant to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the Public Works Director was in error. Section 16. TMC Section 9.50.130 is hereby reenacted to read as follows: 9.50.440130 SEPA Exemption A determination of concurrency shall be an administrative action of the City of Tukwila that is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act. Section 17. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser Authorized. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 18. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 19. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Special Meeting thereof this day of ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Allan Ekberg, Mayor 2020. Filed with the City Clerk:_ Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Legislative Development\Concurrency Mgmt-TMC amendments 8-3-20 CK:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 11 of 11 19 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, TO UPDATE THE TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY TEST FEE SCHEDULE AND CLARIFY THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN FEES; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1945. WHEREAS, the City may update its traffic model and analyze the transportation network on an annual basis to ensure continued compliance with the Growth Management Act and the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, during the 2019 update to the traffic model, the City evaluated the Concurrency Test Fees charged to developers as part of the permitting process; and WHEREAS, during said evaluation, the City determined the Concurrency Test Fee Schedule required modification in order to collect the necessary funds for the City to maintain and update the traffic model; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to impose fees to recoup the costs of services rendered; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public Works fees will be charged according to the following schedule, which shall supersede any previously adopted Public Works Fee Schedule and take effect as of October 1, 2020: PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE WATER RATES FEE Water Meter Installation .75 inch $ 600.00 1 inch $ 1,100.00 1.5 inch $ 2,400.00 2 inch $ 2,800.00 3 inch $ 4,400.00 4 inch $ 7,800.00 6 inch $12,500.00 W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transp fees-Concurrency 8-5-20 CK:bjs Page 1 of 5 20 Water Meter Deduct $25.00 WATER RATES CONT. FEE Water Base Charge (Monthly) In addition to the monthly water base charge, each 100 cubic feet of water used will be charged as shown in "Water Rates (Monthly)." Single Family (one dwelling unit) $ 19.00 Multi -Family (more than one dwelling unit, each $ 19.00 dwelling is charged the base charge) Commercial/Industrial Customers: 2019 2020 3/4 inch Service $ 47.00 $ 49.00 1 inch Service $ 58.00 $ 61.00 1-1/2 inch Service $ 84.00 $ 88.00 2 inch Service $110.00 $115.00 3 inch Service $157.00 $165.00 4 inch Service $210.00 $220.00 6 inch Service $315.00 $331.00 8 inch Service $420.00 $441.00 10 inch Service $525.00 $551.00 12 inch Service $630.00 $661.00 Water Rates (Monthly) In addition to the monthly water base charge listed above, each 100 cubic feet of water will be charged at the following rates: Single Family Residence (Oct -May) $2.80 Single Family Residence (Jun -Sept) $3.90 Multi -Family (Oct -May) $3.40 Multi -Family (Jun -Sept) $4.70 Commercial/Industrial (Oct -May) $5.10 Commercial/Industrial (Jun -Sept) $6.90 Fire Protection Service Charges (Monthly) Per month based on size of service. 2 inch Service $ 10.00 3 inch Service $ 22.00 4 inch Service $ 39.00 6 inch Service $ 88.00 8 inch Service $132.00 10 inch Service $220.00 12 inch Service $287.00 WATER SERVICES FEE Water Turn On $ 50.00 After -Hour Water Turn On - additional fee for customer requested after-hours water turn on $100.00 Unauthorized Water Usage - after shut-off for $100.00 non-payment Special Meter Read - customer requested $ 30.00 meter read outside normal read schedule W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transp fees-Concurrency 8-5-20 CK:bjs Page 2 of 5 21 WATER SERVICES (CONT.) FEE Shut-off notice $ 30.00 Change in owner, tenant, and/or third party $ 20.00 paying agent Emergency Conservation Sanction $100.00 Temporary Water Meter Deposit .75" and 1"water meter $ 300.00 2.5" water meter $1,500.00 Temporary Water Meter Rental per minimum 60 days expiration .75" and 1"water meter $ 75.00 2.5" water meter $ 150.00 WATER INTEREST CHARGE RATE On all water accounts 30 days in arrears from 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis the date of delinquency until paid SEWER RATES FEES Residential Sewer Service Flat rate of $30.00 per month (single dwelling unit) [TMC 14.16.030 (1)] Residential Sewer Service (multiple dwelling Flat rate of $30.00 per month for each dwelling unit unit, permanent type) [TMC 14.16.030 (2)]. Commercial and Industrial Sewage Service Flat rate of $55.36 per month and, in addition, any usage over 750 cubic feet of water per month shall be at the rate of $55.36 per 750 cubic feet [TMC 14.16.030 (4)]. SEWER INTEREST CHARGE RATE On all sewer accounts 30 days in arrears from the date of delinquency until paid 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis SURFACE WATER RATES FEE PER YEAR Surface Water Utility Rates Per Year Service Charge Per Acre Category: 2019 2020 1. Natural $ 222.86 $ 229.54 2. 0 - 20% Developed Surface $ 484.62 $ 499.16 3. 21 - 50% Developed Surface $ 888.24 $ 914.88 4. 51 - 70% Developed Surface $1,325.42 $1,365.18 5. 71 - 85% Developed Surface $1,596.74 $1,644.64 6. 86 - 100% Developed Surface $1,862.62 $1,918.50 7. Single -Family Residential Parcels $ 185.00 $ 190.00 flat rate per residentialparcel) SURFACE WATER INTEREST CHARGE RATE On all surface water accounts 30 days in arrears from the date of delinquency until paid 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transp fees-Concurrency 8-5-20 CK:bjs Page 3 of 5 22 TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY TEST FEE SCHEDULE Fees for Residential and Lodging Use UNIT ALL TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL' ROOMS2 HOTEL/MOTEL Between 1 and 3 $00G-.G 400 40 and under la 000 Between 4 and 5 $&N.00 L500 Between 41 and 60 4 800 Between 6 and 10 $4- 0_00 900 Between 61 and 80 IQ 800 Between 11 and 15 $2,000. 1 500 Between 81 and 100 8 500 Between 16 and 20 $3 500.00 2 000 Between 101 and 120 10 500 Between 21 and 25 $& 0040 2 600 Between 121 and 150 $12,800 Between 26 and 30 $6 500:00 3 200 Between 151 and 180 24 800 Between 31 and 40 $8,000:00 4 000 Between 181 and 220 Im 000 Between 41 and 60 $10,000:00 5 700 Between 220 and 260 Im 000 Greater than 60 $12,000.00 6 800 Between 261 and 300 46 000 Greater than 300 $49,800 ' All residential uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 200-299, including single family, multi -family, mobile home parks, and shared housing. 2 All lodging uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 300-399, including all hotels and motels. Fees for Non -Residential Use GROSS FLOOR AREA INDUSTRIALS OFFICE4 RETAILS EATERYs INSTITU- TIONAL & PORT ALL OTHE USES Less than 5,000 $ g $ 800 $ 1-800 $ 800 $ 2 700 LA 500 $ 5-400 $ 3,500 $_ 500 $ 300 $-500 Between 5,001 and 10,000 $ 1,500 $_2,700 2 200 $ 4,050 $10,000 8,100 $10,500 $ 000 1 800 $2 000 Between 10,001 and 20,000 $ 2,000 2 500 $ 3,600 $4,300 $ 5-400 $16,700 $10,800 $20,900 $ a 5g0 Ll 600 $2,,500 Between 20,001 and 30,000 $ 3_080 $ 3,500 $ 5,400 $ 6,900 $ 8,100 $24,400 $10,800 $21,000 $ inn $ 2,600 $2-,500 Between 30,001 and 40,000 $ ,000 8 300 $ ,inn $9,500 $10,800 $31,300 $10,800 $21,000 $ 2,500 Ll 600 $2 500 Between 40,001 and 50,000 $ 5,800 17,000 $ @,gg0 112 000 $13,500 $37,700 $10,800 $21,000 $ 3-800 LA 700 $2-,500 Between 50,001 and 70,000 $ 6,()()0 9 500 $10,800 $15,800 $16,280 $46,600 $10,800 $ 4,000 L6 200 $ 580 $21,000 Between 70,001 and 90,000 $ 7_000 $12,500 $12,600 $20,800 $18,900 $10,800 $ 5_000 $ 8,200 $21500 $57,600 $21,000 Between 90,001 and 150,000 $8_000 19 000 $14,400 JK 000 $21_600 in 800 $10_800 21 000 $ 6_000 $13,400 $21500 W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transp fees-Concurrency 8-5-20 CK:bjs Page 4 of 5 23 Between 150,001 and 200,000 $ 9,000 $16,200 $'� $10_800 $ 7000 $27,500 $43,600 $85,000 $21,000 Ila 000 Greater than 200,000 $_1_0_()()o $31,500 $18,000 1 149 500 $24,300 1 JK 000 $10,800 I jZ1 000 $-8,()00 20 500 $215W All other uses are charged a $250 per PM peak hour trip. 3 All industrial/agricultural uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 100-199, including light and heavy industrial, manufacturing, and warehousing 4 All office, medical, and service -related uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 600-699, 700-799, and 900-999, including general office, medical facilities, and banks 5 All retail and recreation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 400-499, 800-830 and 837-899, including retail sales, rental sales, athletic clubs, and theaters 6 All food service uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 8314836 930-940, excluding accessory (stand-alone) drive -through espresso stands (or similar) under 250 sq. ft., which are assessed $300 400 All institutional and transportation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 000-099 and 500-599, including schools, places of worship, day care, terminals, and transit POLE ATTACHMENT FEES FEE PER YEAR Pole Attachment (per pole) Natural ..................... $100.00 per year Pole revisions to allow for attachments ............... Actual costs (engineering, labor, inspections, etc.) Conduit Rental ..................................................... $1.00 per foot per year City Dark Fiber Rental ......................................... $+200.00 per strand per mile per year Installation fees ................................................... Actual costs (engineering, labor, inspections, etc.) Section 2. Repealer. Resolution No. 1945 is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Special Meeting thereof this day of , 2020. UAW a143r'r_AllI:121►11[N_N121•1 Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney De'Sean Quinn, Council President Filed with the City Clerk:_ Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transp fees-Concurrency 8-5-20 CK:bjs Page 5 of 5 24 City of Tukwila Alkan Ekberg, Mayor Pub tic Works Department - Nam Ponneka ntl, interim Director I INS \ 11 \ , 11 11 k . \ O 11 TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director BY: Han Kirkland, Public Works Analyst CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg DATE: August 14, 2020 SUBJECT: 2020 Waste Management Annual Curbside Collection Event ISSUE A few Tukwila residents approached City Council members and a public comment letter was sent to the July 27th City Council meeting with questions about Waste Management (WM) communication related to the City of Tukwila's Annual Curbside Collection Clean -Up Day conducted on August 1, 2020. Staff researched these comments and developed this memo to provide a report on the collection clean-up day. BACKGROUND In 2012, the City signed a seven-year contract with Waste Management (WM), effective November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2019. In 2019, the City Council reviewed the costs and benefits of the contract, discussed market conditions, and determined that a four-year extension of the contract was warranted. The contract's current expiration date is October 31, 2023. The new contract included a couple changes. Commercial rates were increased by five percent (5%), effective November 1, 2019, to reflect increased costs in recyclable processing and marketing. This recyclable surcharge is effective for a two-year period, from November 1, 2019 through October 31, 2021. However, WM may request to extend the surcharge by providing justification of the need. Any request must be made no later than 90 days prior to the end of the two-year surcharge period and must be approved by both parties. WM, in return, agreed to commence twice weekly collection and disposal service for twenty (20) city -owned garbage containers at locations chosen by City staff for the duration of the Agreement. The Public Works Department administers the City's contract with WM. The department routinely reviews and responds to citizen complaints about WM service in Tukwila. Public Works monitors Tukwila Talk for discussion on solid waste collection issues, such as missed collections; the department maintains contact with the WM account manager to resolve issues. As part of the contract, Waste Management is obligated to provide two, free clean-up events: one in the spring where residential WM customers may dispose of bulky household items curbside and one in the fall, when residents may dispose of extra yard waste, metals, and electronics at two locations. There is also a recycling event, coordinated by the Department of Community Development, scheduled this year for August 22, 2020 at the Tukwila Community Center. ANALYSIS Public comments received at the Council meeting on July 27, 2020 asserted that WM's communication regarding the annual curbside clean-up day were incomplete and not timely. The spring curbside clean-up event was originally scheduled for June 6, 2020, but due to COVID-19 restrictions, had to be rescheduled to August 1, 2020. The City and WM worked together to revise a notification postcard to reflect the new August 1 date; however, the bulky collection RSVP deadline date on the back side of the postcard was missed. The postcard with the irrelevant RSVP date was mailed to residents 3-4 weeks prior to the event. WM acknowledged and apologized for the misprint and immediately updated its website with the correct deadline and sent a corrected copy to Public Works on July 14, 2020. The City's Communication Department posted this information on the City FB page. As the incorrect RSVP date had already passed when residents received the postcard and as all residents were required to RSVP for a bulky item pick-up, any resident who called prior to the collection day was able to arrange a pick-up. https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/Agenda Items/TIC 08-17-2020/C. Waste Mgmt Curbside Clean Up Followup Reportflnfo Memo Curbside Collection 081420.d 5 Info Memo Waste Management Page 2 A suggestion was made that WM communicate with customers via email regarding important information such as RSVP deadlines. WM responded to PW staff that it was not its regular practice to send mass emails to all its customers and does not wish to appear as engaging in direct solicitation. The City's current contract is silent on email communication with residents. This is an item that can be addressed during the next contract negotiation. Despite the postcard misprint, this year's collection day went well. As is always the case in Tukwila and in all jurisdictions where annual collection days are held, WM and the City observed and received calls regarding curbside waste that had not been scheduled for pick-up. This year, approximately 10% of the collections were unscheduled (see table below). On Saturday, August 12020, WM collected 312 scheduled pickups and 33 unscheduled pickups of bulky household items. Residents called the City and WM to report missed or unscheduled pickups throughout the following week. Scheduled/non-scheduled collections for the past three years were as follows. Date Bulky Pickups Regular MSW Route Extra Curbside Tons August 1, 2020 Scheduled 312 *TBD *TBD Unscheduled 33 (should have numbers by 8/17/20 (should have numbers by 8/17/20 Total Stops 345 TIC meeting) TIC meeting) June 7, 2019 Scheduled 328 Total from 6/7/19 — 55.24 tons 17.28 tons Unscheduled 57 Total from 6/14/19 — 59.86 tons Total Stops 385 June 8, 2018 Scheduled 183 Total from 6/8/18 — 43.32 tons 23.78 tons Unscheduled 81 Total Stops 264 NEXT STEPS For the duration of current WM contract, PW staff will continue to review all WM communication for accuracy, correctness, and clarity. PW staff will ask WM to review their communication protocol and encourage the provider to make improvements. In addition, Staff will ask WM to provide a phone line for Tukwila customers to report issues after clean-up events. Prior to the next contract negotiations, City staff will research best practices for bulky item collection and maintaining effective customer communication for contracted waste management services. These learning will inform the next Solid Waste, Recyclables, and Yard Collection contract language. FISCAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION Discussion only. PW staff recommends beginning the process of procuring the Solid Waste, Recyclables, and Yard Collection contract in early 2022 in order to have the next service provider in place by October 2023. Extensive customer input, using a variety of methods, will be sought prior to the Request for Proposals being issued, the provider being chosen, and the contract being finalized. Attachment: Annual Clean Up Day Postcard 26 CITY OF TUKWILA ANNUAL CLEAN UP Don't miss Tukwila's Annual Curbside Clean Up Day Saturday, August 1, 2020 What: The Annual Clean Up Day is designed to help Tukwila residents dispose of bulky household items. Residents must be a Waste Management customer to participate. Where: Please place all your materials curbside by 7:00 a.m., Saturday morning 0 Regular curbside collection of garbage and recycling will still take place on Friday, July 31. For further details on the event, please visit wmnorthwest.com/tukwila WPM%. 1-855-TUKWILA(885-9452) WASTE MANAGEMENT www.wmnorthwest.com/tukwila O 0 WAR720 4th Avenue, Suite 400 ® Kirkland, WA 98033 wASTE MaNa�EMEN. 1-855-TUKWILA (885-9452), M-F 7am-7pm, Sat 9am-1 pm Informaci6n en espanol / Multi -language materials available Accepted: BROKEN HOUSEHOLD ITEMS: (No need to call ahead) All items must be less than 3 ft. by 3 ft. and weigh less than 65 lbs. BULKY ITEMS You must call ahead for pickup by July 29 for the below items: • Large Appliances Stoves, washers, dryers, dishwashers, freezers, refrigerators, air conditioners and water heaters. Furniture Chairs, loveseats, sofas (NO sofa beds), dressers, patio furniture, other large furniture. Lawn mowers (must be free of fuel and oil) Small Appliances Microwaves and toaster ovens. • Mattresses, box springs (all sizes) *Please remove doors off all large appliances. Limit 3 each per item. Please call Waste Management by July 29 to schedule collection of your items, 1-855-TUKWILA (885-9452) Not Accepted: X AUTOMOTIVE AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE All automotive fluids, car batteries, running gears, and automotive body parts. Products containing mercury, thermometers, thermostats, fluorescent bulbs and tubes, paint or cooking oil. Accepted at: South Seattle Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility 8105 5th Ave S, Seattle WA 98108 X CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION MATERIAL Concrete, asphalt, dry wall, masonry, roofing, siding, insulation, clean wood or lumber. Accepted at: Eastmont Recycling Center 7201 W Marginal Way, Seattle, WA 98106 X CURBSIDE ITEMS • Yard waste, leaves or land clearing debris. • Recyclables including bottles, cans, paper or cardboard For recycling and disposal information for these items visit: kingcounty.gov/whatdoidowith. PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID SEATTLE, WA PERMIT #963 28 Tukwi la_CI ea n up_2020 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Department - Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director David Cline, City Administrator CC: Allan Ekberg, Mayor DATE: August 14, 2020 SUBJECT: Public Safety Plan Focus on Public Works Shop — Part 1 of 2 Issue This memo serves as a comprehensive effort to highlight the history of the Tukwila Public Safety Plan with a focus on the Public Works Shop. This memo is part one of a two-part process to provide background to the City Council in preparation for reviewing the bids in October 2020 for the Phase 1 Tenant Improvements of the Public Works Shop. This Part 1 memo is focused on the history and timeline of the Public Works Shop and will be discussed at the August 17 Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The Part 2 memo will be focused on the budget, financing, options and other Council questions and will be presented at a possible special meeting of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee between August 31 to September 11, or at its September 21 meeting. History and Timeline The need for a new, safe, and efficient Public Works Shop Facility has been recognized and studied for several years. This includes the 2007 Seismic Study of all City Facilities and the 2014 Facility Need Study. In 2016, City Council adopted the Public Safety Plan, which included a new combined Public Works Shop. The City secured a location in 2018, created a master plan in 2019, and is currently on track to go out to bid for tenant improvements in September 2020. Council review of the tenant improvements will be in October/November 2020 and construction is planned to be completed by August 2021. (Appendix A highlights these studies) It should be noted that a significant amount of history of the Public Safety Plan is preserved on the City's website and is a resource that goes back to the initial facilities plan, which is at TukwilaWA.gov/PublicSafetyPlan. In addition, all of Council's actions — and therefore staff reports and information that initiated them — are available at the City's digital records center. Siting and Acquisition As a part of the deliberation on the Public Safety Plan, the Council created a Siting Advisory Committee in 2017 to provide input and advice on the siting of all of the Public Safety Plan projects. The Siting Advisory Committee included two Councilmembers, four residents, and the 29 Public Works Shops Part 1 of 2 Page 2 Public Works Director. Selection criteria was created and used to evaluate options for sites and open houses were held. The current site was selected as the preferred alternative. The City began negotiations with the property owners and secured the current sites in 2018 and 2019. The City acquired Phase 1 sites, the Heiser and Lifestyle Landscape site in July 2019, and will be conveyed the Phase 2 site, the Amalfi/Temkin (UPS) site in November 2023 to allow the current tenant, UPS, to complete it lease. Funding The Public Works facility was originally funded at $30M as part of funding model commonly known as D-20.1. Half of the funds for the Public Works facility comes from the General Fund and the other half from the Enterprise Funds. The General Fund resources include land sales from the George Long, Longacres and Minkler Shops, and issuing councilmanic bonds (LTGO). King County Flood Control District is actively pursuing purchasing the George Long and Minkler Shops from the City. The current budget for the Public Works Shop is now $35.7 million. Council most recently updated the D-20 Model in November 2019 for the Public Works Shops Phase 1 plan and a contract for design of the Public Works Shops tenant improvements in December 2019. The $35.7M includes additional seismic improvements to the original Heiser building along with $500,000 specified for improvements to the Minkler facility. Masterplan In October 2018, the City Council approved a contract with SHKS Architects to create a masterplan for the Public Works Facilities to be located on the former Heiser and UPS properties the consulting services contract with SHKS Architects. From October of 2018 through September 2019, SHKS worked closely with the Public Works staff to create a preferred alternative for a comprehensive master plan. SHKS has formulated several phasing alternatives that starts with the tenant improvement scope of work for the Fleet and Facilities group to move into the Heiser building. In November 2019, the City demolished the former Landscape Building on site. This first phase of improvements to the former Heiser building includes all of the "must haves" identified by Fleet and Facility staff (such as floor drains, site lighting and locker rooms, as examples). This results in an opportunity for City of Tukwila to keep moving forward with the Public Works Department's ultimate goal of relocating all departments on one single site, as different funding sources become available over the next decade or more. Phase 1 - Tenant Improvements & Seismic Upgrades for the Fleet and Facility Building In December 2019, the Council approved moving forward on Phase 1 of the Master Plan and appropriated an overall budget of $35.7 Million for the project and approved a design contract amendment with SKHS to move forward on design and construction of Phase 1. https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/Agenda Items/TIC 08-17-2020/D. PW Shops/PW Shops History gl 08122020.docx 30 Public Works Shops Part 1 of 2 Page 3 The Phase I Tenant Improvement (TI) scope of work (seismic, building systems and functional upgrades) for the use of Heiser property for the Fleet and Facilities group and program on the current George Long Shop as well as the soils and equipment storage on the Longacres Site. This will allow the Fleets and Facilities group to relocate from the existing inefficient and seismically unsafe Long facility to a seismically updated facility with much more space for daily operations, not only for today's workload, but also serve future capacity. Moving the Fleet and Facilities functions to the former Heiser building will be a significant improvement of the work environment for staff and enhance their ability to work efficiently, particularly for the Fleet division. After these uses have been relocated, the George Long Shops and Longacres Sites will be sold and used to finance the Public Safety Plan, including the Public Works Shop, per the Council adopted D20 Financing Model. Major Activities in 2020 • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee regular monthly updates • Seattle City Light easement signed — January 2020 • Contracts were approved for the following: ❖ Removal of paint booths (work was completed in July 2020) ❖ Geotech and other work on -site completed (work completed in spring 2020) ❖ Install security fencing and gates (planned to be installed in fall 2020) ❖ Minkler restrooms upgrade (modular facility planned for October 2020) • 30% design update - March 2020 • 60% design update - June 2020 • Permits were applied for Covered Storage and parking — June 2020 • Tenant Improvement Building permit applied — August 2020 Next Steps The next major step includes a review of the budget in a Part 2 Memo currently planned for the next Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting. On September 21, 2020, Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is scheduled to review the 90% design update of the Fleet and Facility Building, which will include updated cost estimates. Public bid for construction of the tenant improvements will then be advertised. In October 2020, the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is scheduled to review and approve the tenant improvement construction contract award, which then would be sent to a C.O.W. and Regular Council meeting in November 2020. Recommendation Discussion only. https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/Agenda Items/TIC 08-17-2020/D. PW Shops/PW Shops History gl 08122020.docx 31 Public Works Shops Part 1 of 2 Page 4 Appendix A Facility Studies Over the past ten years, the City has numerous facility studies that have detailed the facility history, analysis, and provided recommendations for facility updates and replacements. 2007 Reed Middleton Report This report provided analysis and recommendations of the seismic concerns for all City facilities, including the Public Works buildings. 2014 Facility Need Study by Rice, Fergus, Miller This plan was the basis and foundation for Public Safety Plan. In four main phases it identified the current and future needs, a review of the current facilities, an analysis of how needs matched current facility, and a recommendation for meeting needs for all facilities, including Public Works buildings. It was during this time that the plan for a combined Public Works Shop was identified along with the size, program, and costs that led to the final Public Safety Plan. At this time, the estimated costs of a new facility, including land, was estimated at $30 million. 2016 Plan B Public Safety Plan This plan identified Public Works as one of the Public Safety facilities that would be addressed (along with Police and Fire) during this phase of implementing the Facility Need Study. The Council adopted the full Public Safety Plan and chose to finance the Public Works Shop facilities through General Fund and Utility funds rather than including them in the Public Bond vote. Wagner Report In 2017, the City asked Wagner Architects to verify the actual space needs for a new Public Works facility, which originally was identified as needing up to 15 acres. The Wagner Report completed a quick survey of other Public Works facilities in the region and determined that an estimated 10 acres would most likely meet the current and future needs for Tukwila Public Works. This information was used during the siting process to narrow the selection of sites. 2018 Adopted D-20 Plan In June 2018, the Council adopted a financing and implementation plan for the Public Safety Plan, which has been updated as progress has been made. During this process, the new estimated cost of a Public Works facility was shown as an option, approximately $60 million for a new building and $45 million for a refurbished building, to include land costs. The option of staying within the original $30 million was what was adopted by the Council. Attachments: Slideshow photos from 10/28/19 Committee of the Whole https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/Agenda Items/TIC 08-17-2020/D. PW Shops/PW Shops History gl 08122020.docx 32 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY. ASSESSMENT -JOB SHADOW ►AKIN69 m GEORGELONG I. TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS CONSOLIDATED FACILITY STUDY I COMMITTEE OFTHE WHOLE 1 10 28 19 LONG ACRES 1. = S H K S A R C H I T E C T S 1 33 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY. PHASING - CONSIDERATIONS 4"m 6At'�40 o ca w P,i ern• �s :. 100 MINKLER ° L r 10 1 HEISER + LANDSCAPE SITE AVAILABLE 2019 ° 50 GEORGELONG 0' 50' O LONG ACRES EXISTING AREAS MINKLER GEORGE LONG LONG ACRES INTERIOR 13,897 nsf 16,219 nsf 0 sf EXTERIOR 42,926 nsf 40,112 nsf 13,215 nsf CIRCULATION 43,795 nsf 22,692 nsf 0 sf 1 1 AVAILABLE AREAS I TOTAL 30,116 nsf 96,252 nsf 66,487 nsf 192,856 gsf J r HEISER + LANDSCAPE SCL EASEMENT TOTAL INTERIOR 42,500 gsf tl EXTERIOR 129,800 gsf 0' 50' TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS CONSOLIDATED FACILITY STUDY I COMMITTEE OFTHE WHOLE 1 10 28 19 0 sf 42,500 gsf 14,750 sf* 144,550 gsf* 187,050 gsf* S H K S A R C H I T E C T S 117 34 M M ED SECOND FLOOR PLAN - PROGRAM AREA 3/32" = 1'-0" FAC SUPER 116 SF (PROPOSED) 120 SF (EXISTING) -4 SF I-3%1 FAG FOREMAN CUSTODIAL OFFIC 75 SF (PROPOSED) 1 (E) SHARED OFFICE 80 SF (PROPOSED) FIRST FLOOR PLAN - PROGRAM AREA 3/32" = 1'-0" 0 1- 2- 4- 8' 16, S H K S A R C H I T F C T S 1050 N.38th St. Seattle, WA 98103 PH: 206.675.9151 www.shksarchitects.com TIRE STORAGE 285 SF (PROPOSED) 475 SF (EXISTING) - -190 SF (-40%1 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS - FLEETS & FLEETS & FACILITIES BUILDING PROGRAM SUMMARY FACILITIES EXISTING AREA PROPOSED AREA DELTA — BUILDING (GEORGE LONG) — FLEETS 10,322 SF 15,053 SF +4,731 SF [+46%] — 60% DESIGN 11210 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD FACILITIES / CUSTODIAL 2,345 SF 3,206 SF +861 SF [+37%] — TUKWILA, WA 98168 SHARED 2,463 SF 2,630 SF +167 SF [+7%] — (MEETING / LOCKER ROOM / MEZZANINE STORAGE) Drawn by: MF CIRCULATION / MECHANICAL 1,744 SF 3,630 SF +1,886 SF [108%] — Checked: AH Date: 05/01/ 20 TOTAL 16,874 SF 24,519 SF +7,645 SF [+45%] Scale: As indicated Revisions: No. Date Remarks LEGEND 1 ; VEHICLE ACCESS Z — OFFICE + SUPPORT 0 H SHOPS � ® STORAGE — CIRCULATION MECHANICAL Z 0 PROGRAM " - COMPARISION oc _ 0 u— IA207 - O Z_ 35