HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIC 2020-10-05 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance.
AGENDA
MONDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2020 – 5:30 PM
Virtual Meeting - Members of the public may listen by dialing 1-253-292-9750 and entering conference ID 511 247 467#
(6300 BUILDING, SUITE 100)
Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, October 19, 2020
City of Tukwila
Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee
❖ Cynthia Delostrinos Johnson, Chair
❖ Verna Seal
❖ Kate Kruller
Distribution:
C. Delostrinos
Johnson (email)
V. Seal
K. Kruller
K. Hougardy(email)
D. Quinn
L. Humphrey
H. Ponnekanti
H. Kirkland
G. Labanara
B. Still (email)
City Attorney (email)
A. Youn
Clerk File Copy
2 Extra
Place pkt pdf on SharePoint:
Z Trans & Infra Agendas
email cover to: F. Ayala,
A. Le, C. O’Flaherty, A.
Youn, B. Saxton, S. Norris,
L. Humphrey
Item Recommended Action Page
1. PRESENTATIONS
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a) East Marginal Way S Stormwater Outfalls
Bid Award (Ryan Larson)
a) Forward to 10/19/20 Regular
Consent Agenda
Pg. 1
b) S 152nd St SRTS Grant Acceptance and approval of
Sound Transit Agreement (Cyndy Knighton)
b) Forward to 10/19/20 Regular
Consent Agenda
Pg. 7
c) West Valley Highway Project - Design
Supplemental Agreement No. 1 (Cyndy Knighton)
c) Forward to 10/19/20 Regular
Consent Agenda
Pg. 33
d) Minkler Shop Interim Improvements
Project Update (Peter Lau)
d) Information only. Pg. 53
e) Pavement Management Program
2020 Analysis Report (Scott Bates/Cyndy Knighton)
e) Information only. Pg. 57
f) Public Works Fee Resolution for Water, Sewer, and
Surface Water Rates (Gail Labanara)
f) Forward to 10/12/20 Committee of
the Whole
Pg. 145
3. MISCELLANEOUS
Future Agendas:
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2020 Agenda Items/TIC 10 -05-2020/01. EMWS Outfalls - Bid Award/Info Memo Bid Award EMWS Outfalls.docx
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director
BY: Ryan Larson, Senior Program Manager
CC: Mayor Ekberg
DATE: October 2, 2020
SUBJECT: Surface Water Fund - East Marginal Way S Stormwater Outfalls
Project No. 91041204
Bid Award
ISSUE
Award a contract to Marshbank Construction, Inc. for construction of the East Marginal Way S Stormwater Outfalls
project.
BACKGROUND
This project will redirect drainage along East Marginal Way S from the closed Jorgensen Forge outfall to the City owned
Boeing Z-line outfall and includes installing a small pump station and force main, replacing a portion of the center turn
lane with porous pavement, installing a water quality vault and swale to treat roadway runoff, and lining approximately
400 feet of the Boeing Z-line to reduce the likelihood of contaminated groundwater from entering the City’s outfall.
DISCUSSION
The East Marginal Way S Stormwater Outfalls project was advertised for bids on August 12 and 19, 2020 and four bids
were received and opened on September 9, 2020. The bids were checked, tabulated, and one error was found and
corrected. Marshbank Construction, Inc. is the apparent low bidder with an overall bid of $1,035,201.00. The engineer’s
estimate was $1,300,445.
BUDGET AND BID SUMMARY (All amounts include sales tax)
Bid Results Estimate 2019 Budget
Bid Amount $ 1,035,201.00 $ 1,300,445.00 $ 1,300,000.00
Contingency (15%) 155,208.15
Total $ 1,190,481.15 $ 1,300,445.00 $ 1,300,000.00
The project received $1,106,250 in design and construction funding from the Department of Ecology Municipal
Stormwater Capacity grant and $100,000 in construction funding from the King County Opportunity Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to award the construction contract for East Marginal Way S Stormwater Outfalls project to
Marshbank Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,035,201.00 and to consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the
October 19, 2020 Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Proposed 2021 CIP, page 84
• Project Location Map
• KPG Project Award Recommendation Letter 091019
• Bid Tabulation
1
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2021 to 2026
PROJECT: East Marginal Wy S Stormwater Outfalls
Project No. 91041204
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
STATUS:
MAINT. IMPACT:
COMMENT:
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in $000's)2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design 265 45 310
Monitoring 31 11 11 53
Const. Mgmt. 50 265 315
Construction 300 1,000 1,300
TOTAL EXPENSES 296 406 1,276 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,978
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant RCO 164 100 842 1,106
KCFCD 50 50
Proposed Grant 0
Mitigation Expected 0
Utility Revenue 132 256 434 0000 0 0822
TOTAL SOURCES 296 406 1,276 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,978
City adopted the Z Line in 2015. Construction includes pipe lining, installation of water quality and connecting
the Jorgenson drainage area to Boeing's Z Line. DOE design and construction grant awarded in 2018 for
$1.1m.
Establish legal drainage connections from East Marginal Way South to the Duwamish River.
Drainage from E Marginal Wy S is discharged through outfalls owned and operated by the Boeing Co.,
Jorgensen Forge, and two King County Airport storm systems without easements.
Design completed and approved by the Department of Ecology. Construction is anticipated to begin in
September 2020.
Clarifies maintenance responsibility and will ensure reliability of system.
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program 84 2
East Marginal Way S. - Project Location
Pictometry International Corp., Tukwila Technology Services
Parcels
City Limits
Buildings
9/22/2020, 9:28:06 AM
0 0.2 0.40.1 mi
0 0.3 0.60.15 km
1:18,056
City of Tukwila
3
September 16, 2020
Ryan Larson, PE
Senior Program Manager – Surface Water
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington, 98188
RE: East Marginal Way Outfall Stormwater Retrofit Project – Recommendation of Award
Project No. 91041204
Dear Ryan,
On September 9th, 2020, sealed bids were received and opened for the East Marginal Way
Outfall Stormwater Retrofit Project in the City of Tukwila Public Works Building at 9:30 a.m.
Four bids were submitted, with the results of the bids and Engineer’s estimate shown on the
attached Bid Tab Exhibit #1.
Marshbank Construction Inc. is the apparent low bidder.
Contractor Qualifications
• Verified Bidder Responsibility Checklist and Project Documents.
• Exhibit #1: Bid Tabulations indicate that Marshbank Construction has prepared the
proposal correctly, without errors and projects as the low bid.
• Exhibit #2: Verification of Marshbank Construction contractor’s license from the
Department of Labor and Industries; verification of Business Registrations; verification
of Insurance Coverage, verification of State Excise Tax registration, verification that
Marshbank Construction is not on the State Tax Payment Delinquent List. Marshbank
Construction is not on the State L&I and Federal “Debarred Contractors” List and is not
on the State L&I Contractor Strike List.
• Exhibit #3: Reference Checks – Marshbank provided a long list of references. We called
the most recent references on the list and had 3 responses.
o Jessica with the City of Seattle for the Seattle Waterfront Improvements Project
said; “We have done several projects with Marshbank. They have a good
pipelaying crew. They are qualified to do the work and have good
management.”
4
o Jim Gilbert with Kiewit Construction for their Woodinville Yard Improvements
Project; “It was a small project and crew and they did okay for us. They did a fine
job and got the work done.”
o Charlie Oliver with the Port of Seattle said; “We work with Marshbank all the
time. They have been a sub for us on a dozen or so projects. They are a good
firm and very fair. They have a very good business. They have a lot of
experience in this field and understand the work very well. They are all around
just good people.”
• Exhibit #4: Subcontractor verification
Based on the outcome of the bids and a check of the Contractor’s qualifications, I recommend
that the City of Tukwila award a construction contract to Marshbank Construction Inc. in the
amount of $1,035,201.00.
Please call me with any questions, (206) 826-6942.
Sincerely,
Ray Edralin, KPG
Project Engineer
Attachments: Bidder Responsibility Checklist and Project Documents
Exhibits 1-4
5
East Marginal Way Outfall Stormwater Retrofit Project
City of Tukwila
KPG Project No.: 14015
City Project No.: 91041204
Bid Tabulation
Wednesday, September 9th 2020
Bid Item No.Section No.Item Total
Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost
1 1-04 Minor Change 1 FA 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$
2 1-07 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Control 1 LS 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 45,870.00$ 45,870.00$
3 1-09 Mobilization 1 LS 110,000.00$ 110,000.00$ 59,400.00$ 59,400.00$ 120,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 98,655.00$ 98,655.00$
4 1-09 Resolution of Utility Conflicts 1 FA 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$
5 1-10 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 190,000.00$ 190,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 118,400.00$ 118,400.00$
6 2-02 Removal of Structure and Obstruction 1 LS 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 13,916.00$ 13,916.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 19,780.00$ 19,780.00$
7 2-02 Removing Asphalt Concrete Pavement 1,550 SY 12.00$ 18,600.00$ 9.00$ 13,950.00$ 5.50$ 8,525.00$ 26.00$ 40,300.00$ 16.00$ 24,800.00$
8 2-02 Removal of Concrete Pavement 1,370 SY 15.00$ 20,550.00$ 9.00$ 12,330.00$ 19.00$ 26,030.00$ 30.00$ 41,100.00$ 22.00$ 30,140.00$
9 2-02 Removal of Concrete Sidewalk 500 SY 15.00$ 7,500.00$ 9.00$ 4,500.00$ 8.25$ 4,125.00$ 20.00$ 10,000.00$ 19.00$ 9,500.00$
10 2-02 Removal of Curb and Gutter 410 LF 10.00$ 4,100.00$ 9.00$ 3,690.00$ 7.00$ 2,870.00$ 15.00$ 6,150.00$ 8.00$ 3,280.00$
11 4-04 Crushed Surfacing Base Course 60 TN 75.00$ 4,500.00$ 35.00$ 2,100.00$ 64.00$ 3,840.00$ 48.00$ 2,880.00$ 38.00$ 2,280.00$
12 5-04 HMA Cl. 1/2" PG 64-22 130 TN 115.00$ 14,950.00$ 186.00$ 24,180.00$ 187.00$ 24,310.00$ 190.00$ 24,700.00$ 190.00$ 24,700.00$
13 5-04 Pervious HMA, PG 70-22 250 TN 175.00$ 43,750.00$ 122.00$ 30,500.00$ 204.00$ 51,000.00$ 145.00$ 36,250.00$ 125.00$ 31,250.00$
14 5-04 Permeable Asphalt Treated Base 440 TN 150.00$ 66,000.00$ 122.00$ 53,680.00$ 187.00$ 82,280.00$ 145.00$ 63,800.00$ 125.00$ 55,000.00$
15 5-04 Cement Concrete Pavement 100 SY 150.00$ 15,000.00$ 280.00$ 28,000.00$ 186.00$ 18,600.00$ 300.00$ 30,000.00$ 68.00$ 6,800.00$
16 8-04 Cement Conc. Curb and Gutter 410 LF 35.00$ 14,350.00$ 45.00$ 18,450.00$ 39.00$ 15,990.00$ 58.00$ 23,780.00$ 45.00$ 18,450.00$
17 8-04 Vertical Curb, 24" High 415 LF 30.00$ 12,450.00$ 75.00$ 31,125.00$ 92.00$ 38,180.00$ 70.00$ 29,050.00$ 55.00$ 22,825.00$
18 8-14 Permeable Ballast 1,000 TN 55.00$ 55,000.00$ 38.00$ 38,000.00$ 70.00$ 70,000.00$ 50.00$ 50,000.00$ 55.00$ 55,000.00$
19 8-22 Replace Channelization 1 LS 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,900.00$ 6,900.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 7,800.00$ 7,800.00$
20 7-06 Bioretention Planter 230 SY 100.00$ 23,000.00$ 115.00$ 26,450.00$ 50.00$ 11,500.00$ 110.00$ 25,300.00$ 39.00$ 8,970.00$
21 8-02 PS Cornus stolonifera 'Kelseyi'/ Dwarf Red-Twig Dogwood; 2 Gal. Cont.103 EA 25.00$ 2,575.00$ 46.00$ 4,738.00$ 24.00$ 2,472.00$ 22.00$ 2,266.00$ 20.00$ 2,060.00$
22 8-02 PS Carex davalliana/ Davall's Sedge; 1 Gal. Cont. 245 EA 15.00$ 3,675.00$ 21.00$ 5,145.00$ 17.00$ 4,165.00$ 16.00$ 3,920.00$ 18.00$ 4,410.00$
23 8-02 PS Carex glauca/ Blue Sedge; 1 Gal. Cont. 245 EA 15.00$ 3,675.00$ 16.00$ 3,920.00$ 17.00$ 4,165.00$ 16.00$ 3,920.00$ 18.00$ 4,410.00$
24 8-02 PS Juncus ensifolius/ Dagger-Leaf Rush; 1 Gal. Cont. 116 EA 15.00$ 1,740.00$ 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 17.00$ 1,972.00$ 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 18.00$ 2,088.00$
25 8-02 PS Juncus tenuis 'Blue Dart'/ Blue Dart Rush; 1 Gal. Cont. 116 EA 15.00$ 1,740.00$ 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 17.00$ 1,972.00$ 16.00$ 1,856.00$ 18.00$ 2,088.00$
26 8-02 PS Iris tenax/ Tough-Leaf Iris; 1 Gal. Cont. 58 EA 15.00$ 870.00$ 16.00$ 928.00$ 17.00$ 986.00$ 16.00$ 928.00$ 18.00$ 1,044.00$
27 8-02 PS Sisyrinchium idahoense/ Blue-Eyed Grass; 1 Gal. Cont. 58 EA 15.00$ 870.00$ 16.00$ 928.00$ 17.00$ 986.00$ 16.00$ 928.00$ 18.00$ 1,044.00$
28 2-09 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B 1 LS 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 13,450.00$ 13,450.00$
29 7-04 PVC Force Main Pipe, 4-Inch Diam.930 LF 100.00$ 93,000.00$ 50.00$ 46,500.00$ 40.00$ 37,200.00$ 65.00$ 60,450.00$ 32.00$ 29,760.00$
30 7-04 Solid Wall PVC Storm Sewer Pipe, 8-Inch Diam.20 LF 60.00$ 1,200.00$ 80.00$ 1,600.00$ 106.00$ 2,120.00$ 150.00$ 3,000.00$ 80.00$ 1,600.00$
31 7-04 Solid Wall PVC Storm Sewer Pipe, 12-Inch Diam.500 LF 85.00$ 42,500.00$ 75.00$ 37,500.00$ 67.00$ 33,500.00$ 100.00$ 50,000.00$ 75.00$ 37,500.00$
32 7-04 Ductile Iron Storm Sewer Pipe, 8-Inch Diam.60 LF 90.00$ 5,400.00$ 115.00$ 6,900.00$ 104.00$ 6,240.00$ 75.00$ 4,500.00$ 55.00$ 3,300.00$
33 7-04 Ductile Iron Storm Sewer Pipe, 12-Inch Diam.115 LF 120.00$ 13,800.00$ 135.00$ 15,525.00$ 126.00$ 14,490.00$ 95.00$ 10,925.00$ 120.00$ 13,800.00$
34 7-05 Connect to Existing Drainage Structure 3 EA 1,200.00$ 3,600.00$ 300.00$ 900.00$ 1,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 3,200.00$ 9,600.00$ 1,245.00$ 3,735.00$
35 7-05 Concrete Inlet 1 EA 1,250.00$ 1,250.00$ 1,250.00$ 1,250.00$ 1,325.00$ 1,325.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,450.00$ 1,450.00$
36 7-05 Catch Basin Type 1 9 EA 1,700.00$ 15,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 11,700.00$ 1,375.00$ 12,375.00$ 1,700.00$ 15,300.00$ 3,200.00$ 28,800.00$
37 7-05 Catch Basin Type 2, 48-Inch 2 EA 3,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 3,525.00$ 7,050.00$ 4,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 6,970.00$ 13,940.00$
38 7-05 Force Main Discharge Structure, Manhole, 48-Inch Diam.1 EA 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 4,025.00$ 4,025.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 8,970.00$ 8,970.00$
39 7-10 Pump Station, Complete 1 LS 125,000.00$ 125,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 136,000.00$ 136,000.00$ 128,000.00$ 128,000.00$
40 7-21 Stormwater Media Filter 1 LS 130,000.00$ 130,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 78,000.00$ 78,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 91,450.00$ 91,450.00$
41 7-22 Furnish and Install, 36" Diam. CIPP 450 LF 300.00$ 135,000.00$ 418.00$ 188,100.00$ 418.00$ 188,100.00$ 475.00$ 213,750.00$ 535.00$ 240,750.00$
42 8-30 Potholing 6 EA 1,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 800.00$ 4,800.00$ 500.00$ 3,000.00$ 725.00$ 4,350.00$ 1,870.00$ 11,220.00$
43 8-20 Traffic Signal Modifications (EMW S and S 81st Pl.), Complete 1 LS 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 21,200.00$ 21,200.00$ 42,500.00$ 42,500.00$ 38,000.00$ 38,000.00$ -$
*Bid did not include BI 43
*Bid Said $1,324,746.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost Schedule A 1,300,445.00$ 1,035,201.00$ 1,209,209.00$ 1,303,359.00$ 1,278,369.00$
CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 1,300,445.00$ 1,035,201.00$ 1,209,209.00$ 1,303,359.00$ 1,278,369.00$
SCHEDULE A - ROADWAY
#1 #2 #3 #4
Engineers Estimate Marshbank Construction, Inc.Northwest Cascade, Inc.Rodarte Construction, Inc.A-1 Landscaping & Construction
Bid Tab AH.xlsx EMW Sheet 1 of 16
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/pw drop box/01 tic agenda/2020 agenda items/tic 10 -05-2020/02. s 152nd st grant acceptance/info memo - saf grant acceptance 10-5-20.docx
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager
CC: Mayor Ekberg
DATE: October 2, 2020
SUBJECT: S 152nd Street Safe Routes to School
Project No. 91710303
System Access Funds Grant Award and Acceptance
ISSUE
Formal acceptance of a Sound Transit System Access Funds grant in the amount of $369,000
for the design of the S 152nd Street Safe Routes to School project and authorization to enter into
the attached agreement with Sound Transit.
BACKGROUND
In September 2019, the Sound Transit Board awarded, for the first time in the agency’s history,
grants to local governments for projects aimed at improving safe and convenient access to
Sound Transit services. The grants are part of the Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan. Tukwila
submitted for two grants and both were successful with partial awards.
This project provides safe and convenient access for Sound Transit riders accessing the Link
Light Rail Station as well as needed improvements for pedestrian access for school children
walking to and from Thorndyke Elementary, Showalter Middle, and Foster High schools.
DISCUSSION
Sound Transit has been providing award recipients agreements close to the time when the
application stated the agency would be prepared to advance projects. This is not typical to other
granting sources, but Sound Transit is providing funds to Tukwila as the City is ready to move
forward with the project. With Council acceptance of the grant and authorization to enter into the
attached agreement with Sound Transit, staff will begin the process of consultant selection for
design. With a completed or nearly completed design, Tukwila will be well-poised for future
construction grant opportunities.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The award of $369,000 toward the design of the S 152nd Street Safe Routes to School project is
included in the proposed 2021 CIP. The Sound Transit System Access Funds does not require
any local City match. There is no direct impact to the general fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to formally accept the Sound Transit System Access Fund grant for the
S 152nd Street Safe Routes to School project and approve the attached agreement and to
consider this item at the October 19, 2020 Consent Agenda Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
• Proposed 2021 CIP, page 3
• System Access Fund Project Agreement
• Sound Transit Motion No. M2019-97
7
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2021 to 2026
PROJECT: S 152nd St Safe Routes to School
Project No. 91710303
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
STATUS:
MAINT. IMPACT:
COMMENT:
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in $000's)2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design 369 369
Land (R/W) 0
Const. Mgmt. 400 400
Construction 2,200 2,200
TOTAL EXPENSES 0 0 369 2,600 0 0 0 0 0 2,969
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant 369 369
Proposed Grant 2,340 2,340
Solid Waste Utility Tax 0
Mitigation Expected 0
City Oper. Revenue 0 0 0 260 0 0 0 0 0 260
TOTAL SOURCES 0 0 369 2,600 0 0 0 0 0 2,969
Sound Transit System Access Fund Grant of $369k for design. Apply for SRTS grant in 2021 for construction.
Install curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides of S 152nd St, including widening pavement width by three
feet to construct an on-street parking lane as a buffer between the roadway and sidewalk on the north side.
Enhance safety for students walking to Foster High School, Showalter Middle School, and Thorndyke
Elementary School and encourage transportation choices for the neighborhood.
Design funded, construction pending SRTS grant funding.
New sidewalk and pavement will need to be maintained.
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program 3 8
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 1 of 10
GA 0026-20
SYSTEM ACCESS FUND PROJECT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND THE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND
REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY FOR
NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS & WAYFINDING
FOR TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD STATION
GA 0026-20
This Agreement, made and entered into on _________________, between the City of Tukwila
(hereinafter “City”), and the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, (hereinafter "Sound
Transit");
WHEREAS, the Sound Transit 3 (“ST3”) high capacity transit system expansion plan was
approved by the voters in November 2016 and includes a $100 million System Access Program to
“fund such projects as safe sidewalks and protected bike lanes, shared use paths, improved bus-
rail integration, and new pick-up and drop-off areas that provide convenient access so that more
people can use Sound Transit services;”
WHEREAS, Sound Transit opened the System Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects in February
2019 and subsequently evaluated applications from local governments against evaluation criteria
identified by the Sound Transit Executive Committee;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public comment period and online open house in August
2019, the Sound Transit Board of Directors approved 30 applications from 27 local governments
on September 26, 2019;
WHEREAS, Sound Transit and the City have a joint interest in delivering non-motorized
connections and wayfinding for Tukwila International Boulevard Station, (hereinafter the
“Project”), which was duly approved by the Sound Transit Board as part of the System Access
Program by virtue of M2019-97;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances
contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, it is mutually agreed as
follows:
1. GENERAL
1.1. Purpose. The intent of this Agreement is to establish the terms and conditions for the eligible
work to be performed for the Project during the duration of this Agreement. Attached hereto
as Exhibit A, is the Scope of Work and Deliverables, which outlines the activities, products
and general capital improvements eligible for funding by Sound Transit, as presented to Sound
Transit in the City’s application for Project funding. Funds may be expended on eligible
elements listed in Exhibit A up to the not to exceed amount outlined in Section 1.2 below.
9
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 2 of 10
GA 0026-20
1.2. Agreement Not-to-Exceed Amount. The total amount of the Agreement shall not exceed
$369,000.00. No payments will be made in excess of the established not-to-exceed amount
according to the Project Description outlined in Section 2.1 below.
The funding amount provided by Sound Transit does not include federal funding.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1. The Project is for non-motorized connections and wayfinding for Tukwila International
Boulevard Station as identified in Exhibit A, Scope of Work and Deliverables. Sound Transit
funding will support one Phase:
2.1.1. Design Phase. The City will design the Project. To be reimbursed for the Design
Phase, the City must provide the following: 1) Exhibit B, Project Funding Plan
(which must include the City’s strategy for securing Construction Phase funding for
the Project); 2) Exhibit C, Project Schedule, 3) Exhibit D, Engineer’s Estimate.
3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
3.1. Designated Representatives. The City and Sound Transit have designated formal points of
coordination for this Agreement. The Designated Representatives shall communicate
regularly to discuss the status of the tasks to be performed, to identify upcoming decisions
related to the Project, to provide any information or input necessary to inform those
decisions, and to resolve any issues or disputes related to the Project consistent with this
Agreement.
The Designated Representatives are:
CITY
SOUND TRANSIT
Alex Krieg
Deputy Director, Planning & Integration
401 S Jackson St
Seattle WA 98104
206-903-7663
Alex.Krieg@soundtransit.org
The Parties may change designated representatives by written notice to the other Party during
the term of the Agreement.
3.2. Reporting Requirements. The City is required to submit a Quarterly Progress Report to Sound
Transit’s Designated Representative to include the below elements (Exhibit E: Template for
Reporting Requirements). The report may include supporting documentation (photos, City
documentation, financial information, etc.).
3.2.1. Project Update. Status of major activities in the reporting period, both current and
upcoming.
10
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 3 of 10
GA 0026-20
3.2.2. Assessment of on-going risks. The City will notify Sound Transit of any issues that
may affect the Project Schedule and overall implementation of the Project.
3.2.3. Project Funding. Summary of expenditures during reporting period, and expected
expenditures in the subsequent reporting period.
3.3. Eligible Costs. Eligible costs include actual costs identified in Exhibit A, Scope of Work and
Deliverables.
3.4. Additional Project Funding. The Not-to-Exceed funding amount in Paragraph 2.1.1.
represents approximately one hundred percent (100%) of the Project design cost. The City is
responsible for obtaining the balance of the Project funding described in the Funding Plan
attached as Exhibit B.
3.5. Project Schedule. The parties agree to the project schedule identified in Exhibit C, Project
Schedule. The City shall complete all work and deliverables of the Project by one year after
the expected project complete date shown in Exhibit C, Project Schedule, unless otherwise
mutually agreed in writing by both Parties. The City is responsible for notifying Sound Transit
of any material changes to the Project Schedule and rationale in writing as part of its quarterly
reporting requirements.
3.6. City Work. The City is solely responsible for the environmental review, design, permitting,
construction, project and construction management of all applicable Project elements
including, but not limited to, procurement and construction administration. The City is
responsible for all costs relating to the operations or maintenance of service and capital
improvements related to the Project upon its completion. The City will be the owner of the
completed Project. Sound Transit is not responsible for funding any service operations or for
maintenance of any improvements implemented under this Agreement.
3.7. Signage. Any identification signage that is used during the Project shall identify Sound Transit
as a funding partner.
3.8. Design Review. The City shall provide Sound Transit the opportunity to review design plans
at milestones identified in Exhibit C, Project Schedule.
3.9. Project Closeout. Before payment of the final invoice, the City and Sound Transit will meet
to ensure final deliverables are complete per Exhibit A, Scope of Work and Deliverables.
4. INVOICING
4.1. The City will submit quarterly invoices and supporting documentation that align with the
Scope of Work and Deliverables for payment (See Exhibit F Invoice Form). The invoices
must include the Sound Transit purchase order number provided by Sound Transit.
4.2. The City will submit its invoices with the required documentation, in two (2) .pdf files, via
email to accountspayable@soundtransit.org. Invoices will be paid within thirty (30) calendar
11
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 4 of 10
GA 0026-20
days of Sound Transit’s receipt of the invoice and acceptable and complete supporting
documentation.
4.3. The City agrees to submit a final invoice to Sound Transit within forty-five (45) calendar days
after the City has completed each phase of the work.
4.4. If Sound Transit determines that an invoice lacks sufficient documentation to support
payment, Sound Transit will notify the City of its determination within fifteen (15) calendar
days of receipt and request that the City provide additional documentation. Sound Transit may
withhold payment of the invoice until supporting documentation is provided, however such
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
5. TERM, SUSPENSION, AND TERMINATION
5.1. Term. This Agreement shall take effect upon the last date of signature by the Parties as set
forth below. This Agreement shall remain in effect until 180 consecutive calendar days
following Project completion, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties,
superseded by a future agreement, or suspended or terminated in accordance with this Section
5.
5.2. Termination by Sound Transit. Sound Transit may terminate this Agreement by written notice
under the following circumstances:
5.2.1. If work as defined in Exhibit A is not completed by one year after the expected project
complete date shown in Exhibit C, Project Schedule, unless otherwise agreed to by
the Parties.
5.2.2. If the City fails to make progress towards completing the Project and the City has not
provided adequate assurances of its desire or ability to complete the Project and
commence operations.
If the Agreement is terminated under this Section 5.2, the City shall reimburse Sound Transit
the full amount of all payments it made to the City under this Agreement within ninety (90)
calendar days of the date of termination. The City may ask for an extension of time to
complete the Project for good cause. Sound Transit’s agreement to extend the completion will
not be unreasonably withheld.
5.3. Termination by Either Party. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for cause in the event
that the other Party fails to fulfill its material obligations under this Agreement in a timely
manner or breaches any material provision of this Agreement and the Dispute Resolution
Process has failed to reach resolution within the timelines described therein. The Party wishing
to terminate this Agreement for cause will provide the other Party with written notice of its
intent to terminate and will give the other Party an opportunity to correct the failure to perform
or breach within thirty (30) calendar days of the notice or within such longer period as may
be necessary in the event that correction cannot reasonably be accomplished within thirty (30)
12
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 5 of 10
GA 0026-20
calendar days. If the failure or breach is not corrected or cured, this Agreement may be
terminated by the aggrieved Party by giving ninety (90) calendar days’ notice to the other
Party.
5.4. Except as provided in this Section, a termination by either Party will not extinguish or release
either Party from liability for costs or obligations existing as of the date of termination. Any
costs incurred prior to proper notification of termination will be borne by the Parties in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
6. INDEMNITY
6.1. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the City will hold harmless from, and indemnify
and defend Sound Transit (including its board members, officers, directors and employees)
(the “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, lawsuits,
actions, or liability of any kind or nature, arising out of or relating to the City’s design,
construction, maintenance or operation of the Project, including claims by the City’s
employees. THE CITY SPECIFICALLY ASSUMES POTENTIAL LIABILITY FOR
ACTIONS BROUGHT BY THE CITY’S OWN EMPLOYEES OR FORMER
EMPLOYEES AGAINST ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY, AND FOR THAT PURPOSE
THE CITY SPECIFICALLY WAIVES ALL IMMUNITY AND LIMITATIONS ON
LIABILITY UNDER THE WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT, RCW TITLE 51, OR
ANY INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE ACT, DISABILITY BENEFIT ACT OR OTHER
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ACT OF ANY JURISDICTION THAT WOULD
OTHERWISE BE APPLICABLE IN THE CASE OF SUCH CLAIM. THIS
INDEMNITY OBLIGATION SHALL NOT BE LIMITED BY ANY LIMITATION ON
THE AMOUNT OR TYPE OF DAMAGES, COMPENSATION OR BENEFITS
PAYABLE BY OR FOR THE CITY OR A CONTRACTOR UNDER WORKERS’
COMPENSATION, DISABILITY BENEFIT OR OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
LAWS. THE CITY RECOGNIZES THAT THIS WAIVER WAS SPECIFICALLY
ENTERED INTO AND WAS THE SUBJECT OF MUTUAL NEGOTIATION.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THE CITY’S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY BY THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH EXTENDS ONLY TO CLAIMS AGAINST
THE CITY BY SOUND TRANSIT, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE, OR EXTEND TO,
ANY CLAIMS BY THE CITY’S EMPLOYEE(S) DIRECTLY AGAINST THECITY.
The foregoing indemnity applies only to the extent of the City’s negligence.
6.2. The City further agrees to assume the defense of the Indemnified Parties with legal counsel
acceptable to Sound Transit, whose acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld. In all legal
or claim proceedings arising out of, in connection with, or incidental to the City’s work or that
of its contractors, subcontractors of any tier, suppliers, consultants and sub-consultants. The
City shall pay all defense expenses, including attorney’s fees, expert fees, and costs incurred
directly or indirectly on account of such litigation or claims, and shall satisfy any judgment
rendered in connection therewith. The City may settle any suit, claim, action cost, loss penalty
or damages, subject to the approval of Sound Transit, whose approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld, if such settlement completely and forever extinguishes any and all
liability of the Indemnified Parties. In the event of litigation between the Parties hereto to
13
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 6 of 10
GA 0026-20
enforce the rights under this provision, reasonable attorney fees shall be allowed to the
prevailing party.
6.3. Each Party agrees to bear full responsibility for any and all tax liabilities owed that may arise
in relation to this Agreement, and each Party will fully indemnify and hold the other Party, its
officers, agents and employees harmless from any tax liability owed by the other Party arising
from or related to the transactions set forth herein, including, but not limited to, any taxes,
penalties, fines, and/or interest that are assessed by any tax authority against the indemnifying
Party and further including all attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in response to any claims or
assessments by any tax authority against indemnifying Party, its officers, agents and
employees.
6.4. The obligations in this Section will survive termination or completion of this Agreement as to
any claim, loss or liability arising from events occurring prior to such termination or
completion.
7. AUDITS
7.1. Each Party will maintain accounts and records, including contract and financial records that
sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended for work
performed under this Agreement so as to ensure proper accounting for all monies paid to the
City by Sound Transit. These records will be maintained for a period of six (6) years after
termination or expiration of this Agreement unless permission to destroy the records is granted
by the Office of the Archivist pursuant to RCW Chapter 40.14 and agreed to by the Parties.
7.2. The City will make all Project records available for Sound Transit inspection upon prior
reasonable written request. Audits may be performed by Sound Transit or its independent
public accountants to ensure compliance with and enforcement of this Agreement. Should the
audit determine that funds from Sound Transit have been used for expenses that were
ineligible, then Sound Transit shall provide a copy of the auditor’s determination to the City.
If the City agrees with the determination, then the City will reimburse Sound Transit the
amounts found to have been ineligible. If the City disputes the auditor’s determination, then
the matter shall be referred to the Dispute Resolution Process set forth in Section 9.
8. INSURANCE
8.1. Coverage. During the construction phase of any eligible elements within the Project, the
City shall provide primary insurance coverage in the amounts that it deems necessary for
construction projects of similar size and cost. If the City is self-insured, it shall provide to
Sound Transit's risk manager a certificate of self-insurance. The City shall require their
contractor(s) and sub-contractors to obtain and maintain insurance in amounts and types
suitable to protect Sound Transit and the City from exposures presented by the work
performed under this Agreement. The minimum insurance requirements during the entire
term of this Agreement are set forth below:
14
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 7 of 10
GA 0026-20
a) Commercial General Liability in the amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) each
occurrence limit, two million dollars ($2,000,000) general aggregate limit, covering bodily
injury including death, personal injury, property damage, Employers' Liability and
contractual coverage endorsements, and utilize insurers and coverage forms acceptable to
Sound Transit.
b) Commercial Auto Liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage utilizing
insurers and coverage forms acceptable to Sound Transit, with a limit of at least one million
dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
c) Worker's Compensation insurance coverage, where applicable, shall comply with State of
Washington Labor and Industries requirements.
d) Builders Risk coverage will be the responsibility of all contractors and subcontractors.
e) Pollution Liability (if there is any potential environmental liability exposure) in the
amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence and two million dollars
($2,000,000) aggregate.
f) Professional Liability (if there is a potential professional liability exposure) in the amount
of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim.
8.2. Certificates. With the exception of self-insurance, certificates of insurance must name
Sound Transit as an "Additional Insured," and shall reference the number and title of this
Agreement. All insurance coverage obtained by the City or its contractors and
subcontractors must name Sound Transit, its officers and employees as "additional
insured's" and contain "severability of interest" (cross liability) provisions. The City’s and
the contractor's insurance policies shall be primary to and not contributing with any
insurance or self-insurance that may be carried by Sound Transit and waive their right of
Subrogation against Sound Transit. Certificates of Insurance, including the Additional
Insured Endorsements, Waiver of Subrogation Endorsements and Primary and Non-
Contributory Endorsements, will be provided to Sound Transit before the start of any work
performed under this Agreement.
9. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
9.1. Any disputes or questions of interpretation of this Agreement or the performance of either
Party under this Agreement that may arise between Sound Transit and the City shall be
governed under the dispute resolution provisions in this Section 9. The Parties agree that
neither Party may take or join any action in any judicial or administrative forum to challenge
the other Party’s performance under this Agreement until the dispute resolution process in this
Section 9 has been exhausted.
15
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 8 of 10
GA 0026-20
9.2. The Parties agree that cooperation and communication are essential to resolving issues
efficiently. The Parties agree to use their best efforts to prevent and resolve potential sources
of conflict at the lowest level possible.
9.3. Either Party may refer a dispute to the dispute resolution process by providing written notice
of such referral to the other Party’s Designated Representative. The Parties agree to use their
best efforts to resolve disputes arising out of or related to this Agreement using good faith
negotiations by engaging in the following dispute resolution process should any such disputes
arise:
a. Level One - Sound Transit’s Designated Representative and the City’s Designated
Representative shall meet to discuss and attempt to resolve the dispute in a timely
manner. If they cannot resolve the dispute within fourteen (14) calendar days after
referral of that dispute to Level One, either party may refer the dispute to Level Two.
b. Level Two - Sound Transit’s Deputy Executive Director, Office of Planning &
Innovation, and the City’s Departmental Leads shall meet to discuss and attempt to
resolve the dispute in a timely manner. If they cannot resolve the dispute within
fourteen (14) calendar days after referral of that dispute to Level Two, either Party
may refer the dispute to Level Three.
c. Level Three - Sound Transit’s Executive Director, Office of Planning & Innovation,
or Designee and the City’s Department Directors or Designee shall meet to discuss
and attempt to resolve the dispute in a timely manner.
9.4. In the event the dispute is not resolved at Level Three within fourteen (14) calendar days after
referral of that dispute to Level Three, the Parties are free to file suit, seek any available legal
remedy, or agree to alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation. At all times
prior to resolution of the dispute, the Parties shall continue to perform any undisputed
obligations and make any undisputed required payments under this Agreement in the same
manner and under the same terms as existed prior to the dispute. Notwithstanding anything in
this Agreement to the contrary, neither Party has any obligation to participate in mediation or
any other form of alternative dispute resolution following completion of Level Three of the
process described herein. A Party may decline to participate in such proceeding for any reason
or no reason.
10. LEGAL PROVISIONS
10.1. Warranties. By execution of this Agreement, both Parties warrant that they have the full
right and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement, and that by entering into or
performing this Agreement, they are not in violation of any law, regulation, or agreement;
and that the execution, delivery and performance of the Agreement has been duly authorized
by all requisite corporate action, and that the signatories hereto, which have signed on each
Parties behalf, are authorized to sign this Agreement.
16
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 9 of 10
GA 0026-20
10.2. No waiver. Neither Party will be relieved of its obligations to comply promptly with any
provision of this Agreement by reason of any failure by the other Party to enforce prompt
compliance, and such failure to enforce will not constitute a waiver of rights or acquiescence
in the other Party’s conduct.
10.3. Costs. Each Party will be responsible for its own costs, including legal fees, incurred in
negotiating or finalizing this Agreement, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Parties.
If either Party brings any claim or lawsuit arising from this Agreement, each Party will pay
all its legal costs and attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in defending or bringing such
claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided
by law; however, nothing in this paragraph will be construed to limit the Parties’ rights to
indemnification.
10.4. Public Records. Each Party shall be responsible for its own public records and public
records requests.
10.5. Notices. All notices required under this Agreement must be in writing and addressed to the
Designated Representative. All notices must be either: (i) delivered in person, (ii) deposited
postage prepaid in the certified mails of the United States, return receipt requested, (iii)
delivered by a nationally recognized overnight or same-day courier service that obtains
receipts, or (iv) delivered electronically to the other Party’s Designated Representative.
However, notice under Section 5, termination, must be delivered in person or by certified
mail, return receipt requested.
10.6. The parties may not unreasonably withhold requests for information, approvals or consents
provided for in this Agreement; provided, however, that approvals or consents required to
be given by vote of the Sound Transit Board or the City Council are recognized to be
legislative actions. The parties will take further actions and execute further documents,
either jointly or within their respective powers and authority, to implement the intent of this
Agreement. The City and Sound Transit will work cooperatively with each other to achieve
the mutually agreeable goals as set forth in this Agreement.
10.7. Time is of the essence in every provision of this Agreement. Unless otherwise set forth in
this Agreement, the reference to “days” shall mean calendar days unless otherwise noted.
Any reference to “working days” shall exclude any legal holidays and weekend days. If any
time for action occurs on a weekend or legal holiday, then the time period shall be extended
automatically to the next business day.
10.8. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employees,
agents or subcontractors of one Party shall be deemed, or represent themselves to be,
employees of any other Party.
10.9. This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for both Parties and no
presumption or rule that ambiguity shall be construed against the Party drafting the
17
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 10 of 10
GA 0026-20
document applies to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement. The Parties intend
this Agreement to be interpreted to the full extent authorized by applicable law.
10.10. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original, and all counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
10.11. Severability. In case any term of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
in whole or in part, by a court of law, the Parties will reform the agreement to satisfy the
original intent of the Parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Agreement by having its
authorized representative affix her/his name in the appropriate space below:
SOUND TRANSIT
By:
Kimberly Farley, Deputy CEO
Date:
CITY
By:
Date:
Approved as to form:
By:
Sound Transit Legal Counsel
Approved as to form:
By:
City Legal Counsel
Exhibit List:
Exhibit A: Scope of Work and Deliverables
Exhibit B: Project Funding Plan
Exhibit C: Project Schedule
Exhibit D: Engineer’s Estimate
Exhibit E: Template for Reporting Requirements
Exhibit F: Invoice Form
18
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 1 of 6
GA 0026-20
Exhibit A: Scope of Work and Deliverables
The project will design sidewalks on S 152nd Street between Tukwila International Boulevard
and 42nd Avenue S in the City of Tukwila, including adding wayfinding at nine critical locations
to assist pedestrians and cyclists on decision making for routing and safe walking. This project
will eliminate a gap in the pedestrian network within 1/3 mile of the Tukwila International
Boulevard Station (TIBS), a light rail and bus transit hub with high pedestrian access.
Improvements to surface water conveyance system and illumination will be included.
The project will include development of ad-ready Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E)
using current design standards and meeting all applicable city, state, and federal requirements.
Additionally, all required environmental permits and approvals will be obtained which could
include, but is not limited to, SEPA, HPA, DFW, Ecology, King County and Sound Transit. No
right-of-way (ROW)acquisition is anticipated at this time, but if the survey and design determine
the need for ROW, the parcels and amounts will be identified.
The design work will be managed by City of Tukwila staff utilizing consultants performing the
work.
Deliverables:
• Consultant Agreement
• 30% PS&E Draft
• 60% PS&E Draft
• 90% PS&E Draft
• 100% PS&E Draft
• 100% Ad-Ready PS&E
• SEPA
• Additional Permit and Construction Approvals, as necessary
• Utility Coordination Log
19
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 2 of 6
GA 0026-20
Exhibit B: Project Funding Plan
Design of this project is fully funded through the Sound Transit System Access Fund grant. The
location of this project is such that provisions of sidewalks benefits both transit users wishing to
access service at TIB but also is on the Tukwila School District’s approved walk route to
Thorndyke Elementary School as well as Showalter Middle School and Foster High School.
Because of the proximity to three schools, funding for the construction of these improvements are
good candidates for grant funds through the State of Washington’s Safe Routes to School
program. The City of Tukwila has applied for funding for this section during the 2020 call for
grant submittals and is awaiting the results of the selection process. If funding is not awarded
during this grant cycle, Tukwila will proceed with completing the design in 2021 and would
reapply during the 2022 round of grant applications.
20
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 3 of 6
GA 0026-20
Exhibit C: Project Schedule
Project Schedule
Design Complete
S 152nd Street Sidewalks
Consultant Selection 11/2020
30% PS&E 5/2021
SEPA DNS 7/2021
60% PS&E 8/2021
90% PS&E 10/2021
100% PS&E Draft 11/2021
NPDES 12/2021
Advertise (Funding Dependent) 12/2021
Construction Complete
S 152nd Street Sidewalks 12/2022
Project Close-out 7/2023
Grand Total $2,873,
21
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 4 of 6
GA 0026-20
Exhibit D: Engineer’s Estimate
Engineer’s Estimate is not available at this time. A planning level estimate is provided.
Budget
Design Total STSAF City
S 152nd Street Sidewalks $369,000 $369,000
Wayfinding (incl.)
Subtotal $369,000 $369,000 $0
Construction Total
S 152nd Street Sidewalks $2,850,000
Wayfinding $50,000
Subtotal $2,900,000
22
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 5 of 6
GA 0026-20
Exhibit E: Template for Reporting Requirements
NON-MOTORIZED CONNECTIONS AND WAYFINDING AT TIBS
PROJECT REPORT
GA 0026-20
Reporting Period: _______________
Submitted By:___________________
1. Project Update. Status of major activities in the reporting period, both current and upcoming.
2. Assessment of on-going risks. The City will notify Sound Transit of any issues that may affect
the Project Schedule and overall implementation of the Project.
3. Summary of expenditures during reporting period. Summary of expenditures during
reporting period, and expected expenditures in the subsequent reporting period.
23
System Access Fund Project Agreement Page 6 of 6
GA 0026-20
Exhibit F: Sound Transit Invoice Form
Invoice No. _____ Dated: _________
TO: accountspayable@soundtransit.org
Attention: Accounts Payable and [Sound Transit’s Designated Representative]
Re: Non-Motorized Connections & Wayfinding at TIBS
System Access Fund Project, GA 0026-20
The City’s authorized representative certifies that Sound Transit’s pro rata share of costs under
this invoice is $_______, and is due and payable to the City in accordance with the provisions of
the Agreement, and is supported by the attached invoice and supporting documentation. [Identify
the elements(s), and the amounts by element, for which the amount due applies]
The City makes the following representations and warranties to Sound Transit in connection with
the Invoice:
• All work performed to date has been, unless otherwise specifically stated by [party name],
performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
• The amount specified above has been computed in accordance with, and is due and payable
under, the terms and conditions of the Agreement, has not been the subject of any previous
invoice (unless disputed or rejected for payment) and is not the subject of any pending
invoice from the City.
Any liability of Sound Transit arising from these representations and warranties are governed by
the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
City of Tukwila
By: __________________________________ Date: _________________
[Name, Position]
24
Motion No. M2019-97
System Access Fund 2019 Awards
Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact:
Executive Committee
Board
09/05/2019
09/26/2019
Recommend to Board
Final action
Don Billen, Executive Director,
PEPD
Alex Krieg, Senior Manager –
Planning & Integration
Proposed action
Awards the first round of System Access Funds to the local governments identified the not to exceed
amounts determined by the Board and authorizes the chief executive officer to execute funding
agreements consistent with these awards and in compliance with the System Access Fund program
guidelines.
Key features summary
The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan included a $100M System Access Program, which included
the System Access Fund that is “allocated equally among Sound Transit’s five subareas to fund
such projects as safe sidewalks and protected bike lanes, shared use paths, improved bus-rail
integration, and new pick-up and drop-off areas that provide convenient access so that more people
can use Sound Transit services.”
In November 2018, the Executive Committee of the Sound Transit Board directed staff to conduct a
call for projects in 2019 that would be open to local governments and would make up to $10M per
subarea available between 2019 and 2025. The Executive Committee also established the
evaluation criteria Sound Transit staff would use, which were divided between policy factors
(customer experience, equity, connectivity, and safety and human health) and technical factors
(funding plan and delivery plan).
On February 19, 2019, Sound Transit opened the System Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects. On
April 12, 2019, the call for projects closed and Sound Transit received 53 applications from 33 local
governments requesting more than $86M.
Between mid-April and early July, Sound Transit evaluated the 53 applications against the
evaluation criteria identified by the Executive Committee. This included a review of the application
materials provided as well as follow-up discussions with each applicant about every project
submitted.
On July 25, 2019, staff briefed the Board of Directors on the applications received in the System
Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects and the preliminary evaluation results.
On July 26, 2019, Sound Transit opened a public comment period and launched online open house
to receive rider and resident feedback on the 53 applications submitted. Sound Transit received 55
letters of support and a total of 4,063 survey responses, including 409 open-ended comments,
during the public comment period and online open house. The public comment period and online
open house closed on Friday, August 23, 2019.
25
Motion No. M2019-97 Page 2 of 3
Staff Report
The action authorizes the CEO to enter into funding agreements with the local governments
identified and at not to exceed amounts determined by the Board.
All projects will be implemented by the local government identified, including the planning,
environmental review, design, and construction. All completed projects will be owned, operated, and
maintained by the local government.
Sound Transit will enter into funding agreements closer to when local governments are able to
advance projects and will closely monitor implementation once agreements are executed. Staff wil l
only return to the Board should there be material changes to the project scope identified in the
associated application, including requests for increased funding.
Sound Transit staff will provide an annual report to the Executive Committee on the status of
implementation of projects receiving an award in the System Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects.
Background
The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan included a $100M System Access Program, which included the
System Access Fund that is “allocated equally among Sound Transit’s five subareas to fund such
projects as safe sidewalks and protected bike lanes, shared use paths, improved bus-rail integration,
and new pick-up and drop-off areas that provide convenient access so that more people can use Sound
Transit services.”
In November 2018, the Executive Committee of the Sound Transit Board directed staff to conduct a call
for projects in 2019 that would be open to local governments and would make up to $10M per subarea
available between 2019 and 2025. The Executive Committee also established the evaluation criteria
Sound Transit staff would use, which were divided between policy factors (customer experience, equity,
connectivity, and safety and human health) and technical factors (funding plan and delivery plan).
On February 19, 2019, Sound Transit opened the System Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects.
Immediately before and just after the call for projects opened, Sound Transit staff conducted outreach
and workshops in each subarea with eligible applicants. On April 12, 2019, the call for projects closed
and Sound Transit received 53 applications from 33 jurisdictions requesting more than $86M.
Between mid-April and early July, Sound Transit evaluated the 53 applications against the evaluation
criteria identified by the Executive Committee. This included a review of the application materials
provided as well as follow-up discussions with each applicant about every project submitted. On July 26,
2019, Sound Transit opened a public comment period and launched an online open house to receive
rider and resident feedback on the 53 applications submitted. Sound Transit received 55 letters of
support and a total of 4,063 survey responses, including 409 open-ended comments, during the public
comment period and online open house. The public comment period and online open house closed on
Friday, August 23, 2019.
System Access policies and programs were evaluated programmatically in the Regional Transit Long-
Range Plan Update Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (November 2014). Local
governments entering funding agreements with Sound Transit under the System Access Program will be
lead agencies for system access project-level review under the State Environmental Policy Act.
Sound Transit will enter into these agreements closer to when local governments are able to advance
projects and will closely monitor implementation once agreements are executed. Staff will only return to
the Board should there be material changes to the project scope identified in the associated application,
including requests for increased funding.
26
Motion No. M2019-97 Page 3 of 3
Staff Report
Fiscal information
The authorized project allocation to date for the Transit System Access Program is $142,139,000. Within
that amount, $124,385,000 has been allocated to the third party phase. As the amount of the awards
and the subarea distribution will be determined by the Board, the table below is provided for context.
Public involvement
Following the completion of the policy and technical evaluation conducted by staff, Sound Transit
launched a public comment period and online open house to seek rider and resident feedback on the 53
applications received and the initial evaluation results. The public comment and online open house
period lasted between July 26, 2019 and August 23, 2019. In addition, Sound Transit received 55
comments letters and letters of support. An executive summary of the online open house results and a
compilation of comment letters and letters of support are included as supplement to the staff report.
Time constraints
A one-month delay would not create a significant impact to the project schedule, but may have minor
impacts for entering into agreements with local governments seeking funds in 2019.
Environmental review – KH 8/27/19
Legal review – AJP 8/29/19
Transit System Access Program
(in thousands)
Authorized
Project Allocation
to Date Board Approvals This Action
Board Approved
Plus Action
Uncommitted /
(Shortfall)
Agency Administration $10,000 $1,815 $$1,814,996 $8,185
Preliminary Engineering 2,000 114 113,965 $1,886
Final Design $
Third Parties 124,385 0 0 124,385
Right of Way $
Construction 5,754 $5,754
Construction Services $
Vehicles $
Total Current Budget $142,139 $1,929 $$1,929 $140,210
Notes:
Amounts are expressed in Year of Expenditure $000s.
* Board Approvals = Commitment and PO Contingency Remaining as of 8/27/19.
For detailed project information, see page 218 of the 2019 Financial Plan & Adopted Budget.
27
As forwarded by the Executive Committee September 5, 2019
Motion No. M2019-97
A motion of the Board of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority awarding the first round of
System Access Funds to the local governments identified for the not to exceed amounts determined by
the Board and authorizing the chief executive officer to execute funding agreements consistent with
these awards and in compliance with the System Access Fund program guidelines.
Background
The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan included a $100M System Access Program, which included the
System Access Fund that is “allocated equally among Sound Transit’s five subareas to fund such
projects as safe sidewalks and protected bike lanes, shared use paths, improved bus-rail integration,
and new pick-up and drop-off areas that provide convenient access so that more people can use Sound
Transit services.”
In November 2018, the Executive Committee of the Sound Transit Board directed staff to conduct a call
for projects in 2019 that would be open to local governments and would make up to $10M per subarea
available between 2019 and 2025. The Executive Committee also established the evaluation criteria
Sound Transit staff would use, which were divided between policy factors (customer experience, equity,
connectivity, and safety and human health) and technical factors (funding plan and delivery plan).
On February 19, 2019, Sound Transit opened the System Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects. On April
12, 2019, the call for projects closed and Sound Transit received 53 applications from 33 local
governments requesting more than $86M.
Between mid-April and early July, Sound Transit evaluated the 53 applications against the evaluation
criteria identified by the Executive Committee. This included a review of the application materials
provided as well as follow-up discussions with each applicant about every project submitted. On July 25,
2019, staff briefed the Board of Directors on the applications received in the System Access Fund 2019
Call for Projects and the preliminary evaluation results. On July 26, 2019, Sound Transit opened a public
comment period and launched online open house to receive rider and resident feedback on the 53
applications submitted.
Sound Transit received 55 letters of support and a total of 4,063 survey responses, including 409 open-
ended comments, during the public comment period and online open house. The public comment period
and online open house closed on Friday, August 23, 2019.
System Access policies and programs were evaluated programmatically in the Regional Transit Long-
Range Plan Update Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (November 2014). Local
governments entering funding agreements with Sound Transit under the System Access Program will be
lead agencies for system access project-level review under the State Environmental Policy Act.
Sound Transit will enter into these agreements closer to when local governments are able to advance
projects and will closely monitor implementation once agreements are executed. Staff will only return to
the Board should there be material changes to the project scope identified in the associated application,
including requests for increased funding.
28
Motion No. M2019-97 Page 2 of 2
Motion
It is hereby moved by the Board of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority that the first
round of System Access Funds is awarded to the local governments identified for the not to exceed
amounts determined by the Board and the chief executive officer is authorized to execute funding
agreements consistent with these awards and in compliance with the System Access Fund program
guidelines.
APPROVED by the Board of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority at a regular meeting
thereof held on _________________.
John Marchione
Board Chair
Attest:
Kathryn Flores
Board Administrator
29
As forwarded by the Executive Committee September 5, 2019
Motion No. M2019-97 Page 1 of 2
Motion No. M2019-97
System Access Fund 2019 Awards
This attachment identifies by subarea the jurisdictions, projects, amounts, and phases to be funded via
the System Access Fund 2019 Call for Projects.
Snohomish Subarea
Jurisdiction Project Amount Phase(s)
City of Edmonds Citywide Bicycle Improvements $1,850,000 Design,
Construction
City of Everett Everett Station Nonmotorized Access
Improvements $1,900,000 Construction
City of Lynnwood Scriber Creek Trail Redevelopment $2,500,000 Construction
City of Mountlake
Terrace Veteran’s Memorial Park Light Rail Connector $500,000 Construction
City of Mukilteo 5th Street Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvements $764,000 Design
Snohomish
County
Ash Way Corridor Pedestrian and Bicycle
Improvements (partial award) $1,000,000† Design
North King Subarea
Jurisdiction Project Amount Phase(s)
King County
Metro
Secure Bicycle Parking Expansion and Related
Improvements $100,000 Construction
City of Seattle
Judkins Park Station Access (for sidewalk
upgrades, Hiawatha Place S staircase, and trail
lighting)
$2,400,000* Design,
Construction
City of Seattle Southeast Seattle High Priority Sidewalks and
Walkways (for S Henderson Street staircase) $900,000* Design,
Construction
City of Shoreline 148th Street Nonmotorized Bridge $3,700,000 Design,
Construction
East King Subarea
Jurisdiction Project Amount Phase(s)
City of Bellevue Eastgate Nonmotorized Access to Transit
Improvements (partial award) $1,000,000† Construction
City of Bothell
Downtown Bothell Nonmotorized Access
Improvements (for 102nd Avenue NE
improvements)
$825,000* Design,
Construction
City of Kenmore Juanita Drive NE Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
Improvements $1,500,000 Construction
King County
Parks Eastrail: NE 8th Street Crossing (partial award) $3,000,000† Construction
King County
Metro
Secure Bicycle Parking Expansion and Related
Improvements $250,000 Construction
City of Redmond 156th Avenue Cycle Track $1,165,242 Construction
City of Renton S 7th Street Corridor Improvements (for multi-
use trail) $1,000,000* Design,
Construction
30
As forwarded by the Executive Committee September 5, 2019
Motion No. M2019-97 Page 2 of 2
South King Subarea
Jurisdiction Project Amount Phase(s)
City of Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Improvements $1,625,000 Design,
Construction
City of Des
Moines Barnes Creek Trail South Segment $1,985,000 Construction
City of Federal
Way
21st Avenue S/S 320th Street Signalization and
Pedestrian Improvements $730,000 Construction
City of Kent W James Street at 2nd Avenue N Pedestrian
Crossing $273,683 Design,
Construction
King County
Metro
Secure Bicycle Parking Expansion and Related
Improvements $50,000 Construction
City of SeaTac
Station Intersection Pedestrian Safety
Improvements (for SeaTac/Airport Station only;
for pedestrian improvements connecting east)
$500,000* Design,
Construction
City of Tukwila
Nonmotorized Connections and Wayfinding for
Tukwila International Boulevard Station (for
design phase)
$369,000* Design
City of Tukwila
Tukwila Station Nonmotorized Connectivity and
Safety (for pedestrian signal on SR 181,
improvements on Longacres Way, and
Longacres Way/trail crossing)
$2,064,000* Construction
Pierce Subarea
Jurisdiction Project Amount Phase(s)
City of Bonney
Lake Elhi Hill Trail Staircase $661,936 Design,
Construction
City of Lakewood 111th Street SW/112th Street SW
Improvements $1,040,000 Design,
Construction
Pierce County 112th Street Pedestrian Improvements $2,000,000 Design,
Construction
City of Puyallup Bike Lane Expansions on W Stewart Avenue &
4th Street NW (for bike lanes on 4th Street NW) $155,995* Design,
Construction
City of Sumner Rivergrove Community Pedestrian Bridge $452,000 Design
City of Sumner
Sounder Safe Sidewalk/Bike Programmatic
Enhancements (for bike lanes on Academy
Street)
$875,000* Design,
Construction
City of Tacoma Hilltop Tacoma Link Extension Streetscape
Access Improvements $3,500,000 Construction
*Indicates partial award in support of specific project elements
†Indicates partial award in support of the overall project
31
32
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/pw drop box/01 tic agenda/2020 agenda items/tic 10-05-2020/03. wvh supplemental/info memo - supplement no 1 - 10-8-20.docx
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager
CC: Mayor Ekberg
DATE: October 2, 2020
SUBJECT: West Valley Highway (I-405 – Strander Boulevard)
Project No. 99310410, Contract No. 19-095
Supplemental Agreement No. 1
ISSUE
Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with TranTech Engineering for the design of the West
Valley Highway (I-405 – Strander Boulevard) Project.
BACKGROUND
Since September 2019, TranTech Engineering has been working on the design of the West
Valley Highway project, which also includes improvements along Longacres Way from West
Valley Highway to the Tukwila Station. The design is currently at the 60% level and is
proceeding toward final design. The project has funding for the design and construction from
three grant sources: Transportation Improvement Board, CMAQ, and System Access Funds.
The project is also on the Traffic Impact Fee list.
DISCUSSION
As the design has progressed, needs for additional design funds were discovered. The attached
Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Summary details the specific tasks that require additional
funding to complete the design. With the federal CMAQ grant funds and the fact that the project
is on a State Highway, additional tasks are required by WSDOT in order to gain their approval.
These tasks include the Noise Assessment and Collision Analysis Report. Additional
geotechnical exploration is necessary with the design change from a wall to a “pedestrian
bridge” for the sidewalk over the Seattle Public Utilities 60-inch watermain. Additional costs are
needed to cover costs not included in the original scope of work for design but will result in
significant savings for the project’s construction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Supplement No. 1 is for an increase of $148,325 for a new total contract amount of $680,263.
Right-of-way acquisition costs are not expected with this project, so the $100k budgeted for
Land will be reallocated to Design. The remaining $32,163 will come from reallocation of funds
from the construction phase.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Contract No. 19-095 for
$148,325, for a total contract amount of $680,263, with TranTech Engineering and consider this
item at the October 19, 2020 Consent Agenda Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
• Proposed 2021 CIP, page 8
• Supplemental Agreement Summary
• Supplemental Agreement No. 1
33
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2021 to 2026
PROJECT: West Valley Hwy (I-405 - Strander Blvd)
Project No.99310410
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
STATUS:
MAINT. IMPACT:
COMMENT:
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in $000's)2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design 130 418 548
Land (R/W) 9 91 100
Const. Mgmt. 430 430
Construction 2,765 2,765
TOTAL EXPENSES 139 509 3,195 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,843
FUND SOURCES
Awarded TIB Grant 14 160 2,260 2,434
Awarded CMAQ Grant 89 96 185
Mitigation 0
Traffic Impact Fees 577 303 880
City Oper. Revenue (541) 253 632 0 0 0 0 0 0 344
TOTAL SOURCES 139 509 3,195 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,843
Project is on Traffic Impact Fee List. Grants from Federal CMAQ awarded for $628k that includes $112k for
design of sidewalk/bike path on Longacres Way (S 158th St) and State Transportation Improvement
Board grant of $2.4m for 2018/2020.
Reduced maintenance.
Design and construct completion of seven lane sections of West Valley Hwy with curbs, gutters, storm
drainage, lighting and traffic control, and a pedestrian activated signal near the Southcenter Pedestrian
Bridge.
Shared use path on west side of West Valley Highway from the pedestrian bridge to Longacres Way S.
Safety and capacity items need completion. Portions have been completed by development.
Combined with W Valley Hwy/S 156th Intersection in 2017. Continuing to work with development. Grant
funding obtained for design and construction of West Valley Highway section. No funding for construction
Longacres Way identified yet.
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program 8 34
Supplemental Agreement
Number
Organization and Address
Phone:
Original Agreement Number
Project Number Execution Date Completion Date
Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable
Description of Work
The Local Agency of
desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with
and executed on and identified as Agreement No.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
I
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
II
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days
for completion of the work to read:
III
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate
spaces below and return to this office for final action.
By: By:
Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature
Date
DOT Form 140-063
Revised 09/2005 35
Exhibit “A”
Summary of Payments
Basic
Agreement
Supplement #1 Total
Direct Salary Cost
Overhead
(Including Payroll Additives)
Direct Non-Salary Costs
Fixed Fee
Total
DOT Form 140-063
Revised 09/2005 36
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 1
EXHIBIT A
Supplement 01
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) Improvements Project
Introduction
The City of Tukwila (AGENCY) has retained TranTech Engineering, LLC (CONSULTANT) to provide a complete
Contract Documents package for the West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) Improvements (PROJECT) in
Tukwila, Washington. The following describes supplement 01 to this work.
Scope of Work
1. Project Management
1.1. Project Schedule
The CONSULTANT will update the schedule in Microsoft Project to be distributed and updated to the PROJECT
team and AGENCY to reflect the additional components of the work elements added.
Update PROJECT delivery schedule and provide additional updates as changes occur. This scope
assumes a total of two additional delivery schedule revisions during the duration of the PROJECT.
1.2. Subconsultant Coordination
The CONSULTANT will provide additional direction to the SUBCONSULTANTs and review of their work over the
course of the PROJECT for the work added by this supplement.
Monthly monitoring of the SUBCONSULTANT's design budget will occur over the course of the
PROJECT. Status, as well as projections, will be developed.
The CONSULTANT will monitor SUBCONSULTANT costs and budgets, and propose corrective actions, if
necessary. This may include formal SCOPE and/or budget modifications.
The CONSULTANT project manager will provide direction to the PROJECT team and conduct PROJECT
coordination meetings with appropriate task leaders.
1.3. Internal Project Team Meetings and Field Visits
CONSULTANT team will meet online up to an additional 2 times during the PROJECT in addition to the original
contract. This task includes hours for field visits by CONSULTANT staff. SUBCONSULTANT field visit hours are
captured in their respective tasks.
1.4. Project Monitoring and Reporting
37
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 2
The CONSULTANT’s project manager will monitor the PROJECT planned budget versus actual progress.
CONSULTANT will prepare and submit an invoice and a brief progress report monthly that reflects progress
over the previous billing period and anticipated activities over the next billing period. The monthly progress
report will include a summary of any identified variances from the budget and schedule, reason(s) for the
variance, and proposed corrective action(s).
Task #01 Assumptions – remains the same as original contract
Task #01 Deliverables
The following will be provided for the additional tasks added by this supplement
Meeting Agendas in electronic format (MS Word) as needed
Meeting Minutes in electronic format (MS Word) as needed
Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports
2. Basis of Design
The Consultant will complete additional attachments requested by WSDOT for the BOD.
Assumptions
The CONSULTANT team will not be involved in any required City Council meetings associated with the
BOD or any potential speed limit changes.
Deliverables
Collision Analysis Report
Design Analysis
Mode Function Memo
3. Survey and Topographic Mapping - 1 Alliance Geomatics (1AG)
3.1. Right-of-Way, Property Lines & Easement Resolution
1AG will review and analyze 7 additional title reports for right-of-way resolution and easements. The original
scope of work estimated approximately 10 title reports would be provided in order to show the existing
easements along the easterly project corridor and Longacres Way. Ultimately 17 reports in total were
provided by the AGENCY. 1AG will research King County on-line records and title company records for any
additional recorded documents that may exist that didn’t show up in the title reports provided to resolve
access and sidewalk easements along Longacres Way.
3.2. Potholing the SPU 60-inch Transmission Main
1AG will obtain quotes and manage the exploratory potholes and meet with APS Locates for ground
penetrating radar work to help locate the concrete watermain sleeve on W. Valley Hwy.
38
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 3
4. Geotechnical Engineering-Landau Associates (LAI)
LAI will provide geotechnical engineering services to support design of the bridge and signal standard
foundations for the mid-block pedestrian crossing. Work elements include:
Prior to initiating fieldwork, LAI will coordinate the clearance of underground utilities at the proposed
exploration locations. LAI will mark the locations in the field and contact the Washington Utilities
Coordinating Council's "One-Call" locating service. LAI will also hire a private utility-locating service to
identify conductible utilities located outside of public easements.
LAI will explore subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the proposed bridge abutments by
advancing two borings approximately 30 feet (ft) below ground surface (bgs). The explorations will be
coordinated and monitored by LAI personnel, who will also collect representative soil samples and
maintain a detailed log of the subsurface conditions observed. LAI will subcontract the drill rig and
operator. Upon completion of fieldwork, the boreholes will be decommissioned in accordance with
the requirements in Washington Administrative Code 173-160.
LAI will perform geotechnical laboratory testing on select samples obtained from the explorations. LAI
anticipates that the testing program will include four natural moisture content determinations and
four grain size-distribution analyses or Atterberg limits determinations. Samples will be retained for
30 days after submittal of the final technical memorandum. Samples will then be discarded, unless
other arrangements are made.
LAI will complete engineering analyses and develop geotechnical conclusions and recommendations
to support design of the bridge and signal standard foundation.
LAI will revise its November 2019 technical memorandum to include:
An updated site plan showing the locations of the additional subsurface explorations.
Summary boring logs and laboratory test results.
Additional discussion of near-surface soil and groundwater conditions along the project alignment.
Brief discussion of liquefaction susceptibility and estimated liquefaction-induced settlement.
Updated recommendations for earthwork and site preparation (if necessary).
Geotechnical design recommendations for the new signal standard foundations.
Recommendations for shallow foundation support of the bridge, including criteria for foundation
subgrade preparation, engineering parameters, nominal bearing pressure, estimated foundation
settlement, and lateral earth pressures acting against wing walls
Assumptions
LAI will be provided with a project base map in AutoCAD® format.
Fieldwork can be performed during standard business hours (i.e., no weekend, holiday, or nighttime
drilling will be required).
The exploration locations are accessible to a track-mounted, limited-access drill rig. Trees or other
vegetation obscuring the exploration locations will be removed by others.
39
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 4
During the field investigation, care will be taken to limit surface disturbance; where disturbance is
unavoidable.
The exploration locations can be accessed without entering Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) right-of-way; a WSDOT general permit will not be required.
Upon completion of fieldwork, drill cuttings will be spread discreetly in the vicinity of the exploration
locations.
Traffic control will not be required.
Findings of the current study will be supplemented with subsurface data previously collected in the
vicinity of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian Bridge. These data will be used to evaluate soil
parameters and seismic behavior of strata more than 30 ft bgs.
Native site soils will provide suitable support for a bridge built on shallow foundations, under static
conditions.
The bridge will not be designed to resist the effects of soil liquefaction.
If needed, pavement design will be completed at a later date under separate scope and budget.
If needed, pilot infiltration tests will be completed at a later date under separate scope and budget.
Chemical analysis will not be performed on soil samples obtained from the borings.
5. Environmental and Permitting Services-Landau Associates (LAI)
LAI will conduct a traffic noise assessment for the project corridor, including West Valley Highway and
Longacres Way, for potential noise impacts to sensitive receivers within the project study area.
The traffic noise assessment will include the following components:
Pre-Consultation with WSDOT
Noise Measurements for TNM Model Validation
Noise Assessment
Noise Barrier Analysis
Noise Discipline Report
Assumptions
LAI will conduct validation modeling for up to three receptor locations, and noise modeling for no
more than 10 receptor locations.
Peak hour Existing Year, No Build, and Build Year traffic volumes will be provided to LAI.
Will provide a letter for the City to distribute to noise sensitive receptor locations (i.e., residences,
businesses, etc.) seeking permission to complete noise field measurements.
Efforts to collect noise measurements from building interiors or balconies is not included in this scope
of services.
Deliverables
An electronic (MS Word) copy of the City-review draft noise technical report.
An electronic (MS Word) copy of the WSDOT-review draft noise technical report.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final noise technical report.
40
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 5
6-8. No Changes
9. Stormwater Compliance and Conveyance Design
This section is not being supplemented however an error is being corrected to add the hours associated with
work element 9.1 through 9.3 which were not included in the original contract. The original 9.1-9.3 are
included below:
9.1. Pre-Design Record
CONSULTANT will prepare a Pre-Design Record document summarizing the various stormwater requirements
associated with this project to be included in an appendix of the Stormwater Technical Information Report
(TIR).
9.2. Site Assessment and Mapping
The CONSULTANT will prepare site assessment maps showing existing drainage features and drainage
patterns within the WVH project corridor and any relevant adjacent properties. Work elements include;
Create existing drainage condition maps which will illustrate existing drainage features and drainage
patterns. The existing drainage condition maps will be derived from the topographic survey base map
created for this PROJECT.
Conduct site reconnaissance to verify drainage features and drainage patterns.
Create soil map showing soil types – Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) – Consultant will
acquire NRCS survey maps.
Create basin/TDA map which delineates the on-site project basin(s) and shows where the PROJECT
site is relative to the overall drainage basin that it lies within. AGENCY mapping, its 2013 Stormwater
Comprehensive Plan, and records to be consulted for the overall drainage basin information.
Create change in land use area maps to identify existing and proposed impervious areas that will be
used for the threshold determination in accordance with the stormwater standards.
Assumptions:
Flow control is not required for this PROJECT given the anticipated amount of new impervious area
created in both drainage basins is less than the threshold quantity.
Water quality is not required for this project given the anticipated amount of new pollution
generating impervious area created in both drainage basins is less than the threshold quantity.
Per the AGENCY’s 2013 Comprehensive Plan all of Longacres Way and the eastern half of WVH
between Longacres Way and the I-405 Ramps drains to the east, away from the Green River. This
creates two distinct drainage basins within the PROJECT site.
No new outfalls at the Green River will be constructed. Existing outfalls will be connected to
upstream.
City will provide electronic GIS information on existing stormwater system that CONSULTANT will use
to determine existing conditions.
41
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 6
Deliverables:
Existing drainage condition maps, to be included in the appendix of the Stormwater Technical
Memorandum.
Soil map, to be included in the appendix of the Stormwater Technical Memorandum.
Basin map, to be included in the appendix of the Stormwater Technical Memorandum.
Change in land use area maps, to be included in the appendix of the Stormwater Technical
Memorandum.
9.3. Conveyance Calculations
The Consultant will prepare preliminary storm pipe conveyance capacity calculations for new pipe segments
proposed as part of the improvements. This work element includes;
Prepare preliminary pipe sizing calculations, using full-flow conditions with the Manning equation and
the Rational Method (Stormshed 3G).
Assumptions:
Pipe conveyance calculations will not be performed for any existing pipe systems to remain or the
main existing trunk line which the new on-site conveyance system will be tying into.
There will be no upgrades to any of the existing storm drain segments that are to remain upon project
completion.
Gutter flow analysis will not be required as part of this project. Inlet spacing will be determined
according to the City’s design standards.
Deliverables:
Preliminary pipe conveyance calculations, to be included in the appendix of the Stormwater Technical
Memorandum.
10. Plans, Specifications, & Engineer’s Opinion of Construction Cost (EEOC)
The CONSULTANT will prepare the following additional items to be included in the 90%, 100%, and final Bid Ready
Contract Documents (Plans, Specifications, & Estimates) for AGENCY review, comment, approval, and
advertisement. The AGENCY will compile a written response log to facilitate the CONSULTANT’s tracking of all
comments and for efficient inclusion in the contract documents. The CONSULTANT will maintain design
documentation including design calculations. CONSULTANT will develop the following Plans all at 1”=20’ plotted
at full-size except for intersection and driveway details at 1”=10’ plotted at full-size:
Submittal Phase
Sheet Title
Estimated
Sheets 30% 60% 90% 100%
Bid
Ready
Party
Illumination (Longacres Way) 3 X X X TT
Illumination Details 1 X X X TT
Landscaping, Irrigation, & Urban Design Plans 4 X X X PT
Landscaping, Irrigation, & Urban Design Details 4 X X X PT
Estimated # of additional Sheets 4
42
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 7
Work Elements 10.3 – 10.5 of the original contract will apply for the above new sheets.
10.1.1 Landscaping and Urban Design Plans Specifications and Engineer’s Opinion
of Construction Cost (PERTEET)
PERTEET will prepare final Landscaping and Urban Design Plans and Details with Specifications and
Engineer’s Opinion of Construction Cost as part of the following submittal packages:
• 90% submittal
• 100% submittal
• Ad-Ready submittal
Assumptions:
Perteet will not be responsible for any effort in the design, estimation or specifications for irrigation.
QA/QC and response to CONSULTANT and AGENCY comments is inherent in this SCOPE.
The landscape and urban design extents are limited to West Valley Highway from Strander Blvd
to S 156th St, and do not include Longacres Way (LAW).
Urban design furnishings are assumed to be prefabricated features to be furnished and installed
by the Contractor.
The existing sidewalk at LAW is to remain and as such there shall be no property restoration on LAW.
Tree and landscape requirements shall follow provisions in the Tukwila Municipal Code.
Trantech will provide the design of sidewalk, plaza areas, planter areas, and street light locations to
be used in the 90% submittal prior to Perteet kicking off the 90% design.
Submittals are limited to one for each level of design. Additional iterations and submittal may
be considered as additional extra services.
Deliverables:
One full-size (22x34) copy of Plans submitted electronically (Adobe PDF) for each submittal;
One copy of the Engineer’s Opinion of Construction Cost (MS Excel) for bid items associated with
the illumination, landscape and urban design.
One copy of the Specifications (MS Word) for bid items associated with the illumination,
landscape and urban design.
Design Criteria
The design criteria will remain the same at that established under the original Scope of Services. Changes in
any design standards or requirements after work has begun may result in extra services.
Project Deliverables
43
West Valley Highway (Strander Blvd to I-405) 8
Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement (“Documents”) will be
furnished by the Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. Whether the
Documents are submitted in electronic media or in tangible format, any use of the Documents on another
project or on extensions of this project beyond the use for which they were intended, or any modification of
the Documents, or conversion of the Documents to an alternate system or format will be without liability legal
exposure to the Consultant: City shall assume all risks associated with such use, modifications, or conversions.
Consultant may remove from the electronic Documents delivered to City all references to Consultant’
involvement and will retain a tangible copy of the Documents delivered to City which shall govern the
interpretation of the Documents and the information recorded. Electronic files are considered working files
only- Consultant is not required to maintain electronic files beyond 90 days after final project billing, and
makes no warranty as to the viability of electronic files beyond 90 days from date of transmittal.
See deliverables under each task for those items the Consultant will provide.
44
Firm Supplement 01 Total
TranTech Engineering, LLC $75,493
Perteet Engineering, LLC $16,492
Landau Associates $43,689
1 Alliance $12,651
Total Supplement 01 $148,325
See attachments following for breakout of costs per task
Exhibit B
Supplement 01
West Valley Highway (I-405 - Strander Blvd)
Page 1 45
Exhibit B - Fee Schedules
West Valley Highway (I-405 - Strander Blvd)
Project Senior Senior Senior Office Admin Total
Task Items Manager Civil Traffic CAD Engineer 3
Engr.Engr.Tech
Task 1
1.2 Project Schedule 2 4
1.3 Subconsultant Coordination 4 16
1.4 Internal Project Team Meetings and Field Visits 8 16
1.5 Project Monitoring and Reporting 6 14 8 16
Task 2.1 CAR added to BOD 0.5 8 12 8
Design Analysis 0.5 6 8
Technical Memo 0.5 8 4
Revisions based on WSDOT Comments 2 2 2
QA/QC 0.5
Task 9 2 1
Backgroun LAW Ad-Ready 0.5 6 8 12
9.1 Pre-Design Record 1 20 12 1
9.2 Site Assessment and Mapping 1
Create Drainage Basin Maps 16 24
Conduct site reconnaissance 8
Create Soil Map Showing Soil Types 1 3 1
Create basin/TDA Map 40 80
Create change in use area maps to identify
existing and proposed impervious areas that will
be used for the threshold determination in
accordance with the stormwater standards 8 12
9.3 Conveyance Calculations 1
Prepare preliminary pipe calculations using
full flow conditions with the Manning equation
and the Rational Method 32 16
-QA/QC 1 10 2
Admin 2 1
Task 10
10.3 Illumination for LAW at 90% - 2 sheets 1 4 24 16
10.4 100% illumination plans, specs, and estimate 1 2 4 4 4
10.5 Ad-Ready 1 1 2 2 2
-QA/QC 1 1
Admin 2 1
Total Manhours 29.5 223 57 187 36 19 552
Labor Rates (DLR)55.00$ 55.00$ 55.00$ 43.00$ 38.00$ 33.00$
Total Direct Salary Cost $1,623 $12,265 $3,135 $8,041 $1,368 $627 $27,059
Overhead (ICR 148.87%)$40,282
Fee (30%)$8,118
Total Labor Cost $75,458
Subconsultants Cost
Cost
Markup
(10%)
Total Subconsultant Cost $0
Direct Costs (Copy, Fedex, Per Diem …)
Item #Amount Unit
Mileage 60 $0.58 Miles $35
Subtotal Direct Costs $35
Total Total Fee $75,493
46
Project
Client
PM
Tukwila-West Valley Highway (I 405/Strander Blvd)
Landscape Design
TranTech Engineering, LLC
Brianne Ross
Contract Start Date
Contract End Date
Contract Duration:
4/17/2019
4/17/2020
12 Months
Last Update date
Perteet Project No.
9/14/2020
20190049.000S1
Sr.
Associate
Sr. Engineer
/ Mgr
Engineer II Lead
Technician/
Designer
Accountant Total
Hours
Labor Dollars
Task Billing Rate $71.00 $63.00 $37.00 $37.00 $41.00
90% Urban Design, Landscape
Plans/Specs
24.00 6.00 2.00 8.00 1.00 41.00 $2,493.00
Total 90% Urban Design, Landscape
Plans/Specs
24.00 6.00 2.00 8.00 1.00 41.00 $2,493.00
100% Urban Design, Landscape
Plans/Specs
14.00 4.00 2.00 8.00 1.00 29.00 $1,657.00
Total 100% Urban Design, Landscape
Plans/Specs
14.00 4.00 2.00 8.00 1.00 29.00 $1,657.00
Ad-Ready Urban Design, Landscape
Plans/Specs
8.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 17.00 $983.00
Total Ad-Ready Urban Design, Landscape
Plans/Specs
8.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 17.00 $983.00
Expenses
Total Expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00
Total Hours 46.00 13.00 5.00 20.00 3.00 87.00
Total Dollars $3,266.00 $819.00 $185.00 $740.00 $123.00 $5,133.00
Expenses:
Miscellaneous Expenses 106
Totals:106
SUMMARY
Direct Salary Cost $5,133.00
Overhead Cost 189.23 %$9,713.00
Fee 30%$1,540.00
Labor $16,386.00
Expenses $106.00
Subconsultants $0.00
CONTRACT TOTAL $16,492.00
v7.6.755 (ASWANSON) -
47
Fee Determination Table
Additional Geotechnical Engineering Services
West Valley Highway/I-405 to Strander Blvd
Firm Name: LANDAU ASSOCIATES
Description Notes Principal
Senior
Associate Senior Project Project Senior Staff Staff CAD/GIS
Project
Coordinator Total Hours
Total Direct Salary
Cost OH (2.1253)
Total DSC+OH
per Task
Total Fee per
Task Total per Task
Task 1 Additional Geotechnical Engineering Services
1.1 Geotechnical Engineering Services 0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
1.1a Data Compilation and Review 1 3 4 177.53$ 377.30$ 554.83$ 53.26$ 608.08$
1.1b Utility Locates 4 4 165.40$ 351.52$ 516.92$ 49.62$ 566.54$
1.1c Coor. Field Activities 2 4 6 292.05$ 620.70$ 912.76$ 87.62$ 1,000.37$
1.1d Borehole Logging - Drilling 10 10 413.50$ 878.81$ 1,292.31$ 124.05$ 1,416.36$
1.1e Exploration Logs 3 3 124.05$ 263.64$ 387.69$ 37.22$ 424.91$
1.1f Engineering Analysis 2 20 22 993.05$ 2,110.54$ 3,103.59$ 297.92$ 3,401.51$
1.1g Revised Tech Memo 6 33 3 8 50 2,248.99$ 4,779.79$ 7,028.78$ 674.70$ 7,703.48$
1.1h Final Tech Memo 2 4 1 2 9 437.77$ 930.40$ 1,368.18$ 131.33$ 1,499.51$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
13 0 74 0 0 7 4 10 108 4,852.35$ 10,312.71$ 15,165.06$ 1,455.71$ 16,620.77$
83.03$ 61.30$ 41.35$ 37.31$ 31.74$ 31.50$ 39.00$ 33.66$ Sub-Totals
1,079.35$ -$ 3,059.90$ -$ -$ 220.50$ 156.00$ 336.60$ 4,852.35$
212.53%2,293.95$ -$ 6,503.21$ -$ -$ 468.63$ 331.55$ 715.38$ 10,312.71$
DSC+OH 3,373.30$ -$ 9,563.11$ -$ -$ 689.13$ 487.55$ 1,051.98$ 15,165.06$
30%323.81$ -$ 917.97$ -$ -$ 66.15$ 46.80$ 100.98$ 1,455.71$
3,697.11$ -$ 10,481.08$ -$ -$ 755.28$ 534.35$ 1,152.96$ 16,620.77$
3,697.11$ -$ 10,481.08$ -$ -$ 755.28$ 534.35$ 1,152.96$ 16,620.77$
REIMBURSABLES
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Sub-Totals Totals
Reproduction 1 LS 148.87$ 148.87$ 148.87$
Mileage 107 Each 0.56$ 59.92$ 59.92$
Daily Field Equipment Charge 2 Each 20.00$ 40.00$ 40.00$
Water Level Indicator 1 Each 30.00$ 30.00$ 30.00$
Field Disposables 2 Each 20.00$ 40.00$ 40.00$
Geotechincal Subcontractor Costs 1 Each 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$
Geotechnical Laboratory Testing 1 Each 460.00$ 460.00$ 460.00$
Total 3,378.79$
Firm Name: LANDAU ASSOCIATES Total Project Costs 20,000$
Current Hourly Rates
Fee Proposal
West Valley Highway
9/16/2020
Total Hours per person
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
Overhead Cost (2.1253 of DSC)
Fee ( 0.3 of DSC)
Fully Burdened Rate
Sub-Total Burdened Labor Cost
Page 1 of 1 48
Fee Determination Table
Traffic Noise Assessment Services
West Valley Highway/Langacres Way Shared Use Pathways
Page 1 of 1
Firm Name: LANDAU ASSOCIATES
Description Notes Principal
Senior
Associate Senior Project Senior Staff Staff CAD/GIS
Project
Coordinator Total Hours
Total Direct Salary
Cost OH (2.1253)
Total DSC+OH
per Task
Total Fee per
Task Total per Task
Task 4 Environmental and Permitting Services
4.14 Noise Analysis 0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4.14a 0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4.14b Pre-consultation with WSDOT 1 1 2 98.61$ 209.58$ 308.19$ 29.58$ 337.77$
4.14c Noise measurements for model validation 8 16 24 806.32$ 1,713.67$ 2,519.99$ 241.90$ 2,761.89$
4.14d Noise assessment and QAQC 10 32 4 10 56 2,323.88$ 4,938.94$ 7,262.82$ 697.16$ 7,959.99$
4.14e Barrier analysis 12 12 6 30 1,417.32$ 3,012.23$ 4,429.55$ 425.20$ 4,854.75$
4.14f Reporting 8 32 2 6 4 52 2,115.96$ 4,497.05$ 6,613.01$ 634.79$ 7,247.80$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0 31 0 85 20 2 22 4 164 6,762.09$ 14,371.47$ 21,133.56$ 2,028.63$ 23,162.19$
80.29$ 61.30$ 50.00$ 37.31$ 31.74$ 31.50$ 39.00$ 33.66$ Sub-Totals
-$ 1,900.30$ -$ 3,171.35$ 634.80$ 63.00$ 858.00$ 134.64$ 6,762.09$
212.53%-$ 4,038.71$ -$ 6,740.07$ 1,349.14$ 133.89$ 1,823.51$ 286.15$ 14,371.47$
DSC+OH -$ 5,939.01$ -$ 9,911.42$ 1,983.94$ 196.89$ 2,681.51$ 420.79$ 21,133.56$
30%-$ 570.09$ -$ 951.41$ 190.44$ 18.90$ 257.40$ 40.39$ 2,028.63$
-$ 6,509.10$ -$ 10,862.83$ 2,174.38$ 215.79$ 2,938.91$ 461.18$ 23,162.19$
-$ 6,509.10$ -$ 10,862.83$ 2,174.38$ 215.79$ 2,938.91$ 461.18$ 23,162.19$
REIMBURSABLES
Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Sub-Totals Totals
Reproduction 0 LS -$ -$ -$
Mileage 100 Each 0.56$ 56.00$ 56.00$
Field Supplies 1 Each 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$
Parking 0 Each -$ -$ -$
Geotechincal Subcontractor Costs 0 LS -$ -$ -$
Cultural Resources Subcontractor Costs 0 Each -$ -$ -$
Geotechnical Laboratory Testing 0 Each 100.00$ -$ -$
Total 156.00$
370.59$
(40% of labor * 4% increase)
Firm Name: LANDAU ASSOCIATES Total Project Costs 23,689$
Prorated Salary Escalation
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
Overhead Cost (2.1253 of DSC)
Fee ( 0.3 of DSC)
Fully Burdened Rate
Sub-Total Burdened Labor Cost
Current Hourly Rates
Fee Proposal
West Valley Highway
11/22/2019
Total Hours per person
49
Project City of Tukwila: West Valley Highway (I-405 to Strander Blvd)
Project No.TRAN_19-079
Project Manager Dave Peebler
Client Trantech Engineering, LLC
Client Project No.
Project Manager Kash Nikzad
Contract Start Date:September 13, 2019
Contract End Date:December 31, 2020
Staff Branden Robert Thao
Work Element #Work Element CADD 5 CADD 5
Billing/ Acct
Coordinator Total Hours Total Dollars
Billing Rate 39.00 39.50 33.50
3.0 Survey Mapping 2.00 37.00 0.75
Work Element Total Hours 2.00 37.00 0.75 39.75
Work Element Total Dollars 78.00$ 1,461.50$ 25.13$ 1,564.63$
Summary
Direct Salary Cost 1,564.63$
Overhead Cost 157.56%2,465.24$
Fee 30.00%469.39$
Labor Total 4,499.26$
Expenses $8,152
Subconsultants -$
Total $ 12,651.26
Exhibit B
50
Task Fee Notes
Noise Assessment $23,689
This was not part of original scope, required by WSDOT at
environmental kick-off meeting.
Improve Illumination on Longacres Way $10,020 Requested scope increase by City.
Landscaping and urban design $16,492 Original contract only included landscaping/urban design to 30% level.
Additional Potholing Expense $8,152
Additional site visit required and additional equipment rental and time
was outside original scope.
Collision Analysis Report, Design Analysis, and Mode Function
Memo $9,479
Original scope did not include completing a Collision Analysis Report.
WSDOT requirement.
Additional 7 title reports reviewed and easement/potholing $4,499
Additional survey costs for more title report reviews than originally
scoped.
Work Element 9.1-9.3 $39,709
Inadvertent error from original contract. Consultant did not allot time
for work elements 9.1-9.3 as an oversight during negotiations on fee.
Additional Geotechnical Services for Pedestrian Bridge Foundation
and section of report needed for SPU $20,000
The initial geotechnical investigation was limited to what was necessary
for a wall, as SPU requires no net increase in weight over their pipe.
Design has determined a pedestrian bridge over the SPU pipe will be a
better option at a lower construction cost.
Bring Longacres Way to Ad-ready $3,228 Original scope was for shelf ready only
Additional Project Management for supplement items $13,057 PM for the above supplement work elements
Total $148,325
Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Summary
51
52
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2020 Agenda Items/TIC 10-05-2020/02. Minkler Restroom Project Update/9-22-20, Info Memo for 10-5-20 TIC, pl.docx
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director
BY: Peter Lau, Senior Program Manager
CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg
DATE: October 2, 2020
SUBJECT: Minkler Shop Interim Improvements
Project No. 91930606
Project Update
Issue
Provide an update on the Minkler Shop Interim Improvements.
BACKGROUND
On December 2, 2019, Council, with a vote of 7-0, approved design of Public Works Shops Phase 1 (Fleet and
Facilities tenant/seismic improvements) and the Minkler Shop Interim Improvements that included security, lighting,
and additional lockers and restrooms with a budget $500,000. On March 23, 2020, Council approved a contract for a
not to exceed amount of $308,000 to provide improvements to the restroom facilities at Minkler Shop.
DISCUSSION
After some assessment of the existing restrooms inside the Minkler Shop, Public Works de termined that a new
modular restroom building, with additional lockers and a shower, is a more economical way to provide the same
restroom upgrades.
An added benefit is that the modular restroom can be relocated to the new Public Works Shops on Tukwila
International Blvd. An ancillary restroom, closer to equipment, would be beneficial to crews throughout the day.
Through the job order contract process, the City executed a contract with Saybr Contractors, Inc. to design and
construct the new modular restroom building with a contract amount is $259,792.16. This modular restroom will
provide two restroom stalls, one urinal, one shower, two sinks and 20 lockers. Currently, Saybr is securing the
building permit and working with an engineering group to approve/stamp the modular restroom design. Construction
is expected at the Minkler Shop site in late October or early November this year.
After the completion of the modular project, remaining funds will be utilized for a security gate and additional light
fixtures at Minkler Shop.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The contract amount of $259,792.16 with Saybr Contractors is within the authorized budget of $308,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Information only.
Attachment: Two illustrative photos of the future Modular Restroom
53
Page 5 Saybr Contractors, Inc.
Concept Exterior:
PAINT COLORS TO BE SELECTED BY CITY
Unit will have no windows and one door.
54
Page 7 Saybr Contractors, Inc.
Concept Exterior:
PAINT COLORS TO BE SELECTED BY CITY
Unit will have no windows and one door.
55
56
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/pw drop box/01 tic agenda/2020 agenda items/tic 10 -05-2020/05. pavement mgmt report/final info memo - 2020 pms report sb dc copy1.docx
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager
Scott Bates, Project Manager
CC: Mayor Ekberg
DATE: October 2, 2020
SUBJECT: Pavement Management Program
2020 Analysis Report
ISSUE
Discussion on the new 2020 Pavement Management Analysis Report including analysis of
Tukwila’s road system rating and budgetary impacts for the Annual Overlay & Repair Program.
BACKGROUND
Tukwila owns, operates, and maintains over 200 lane miles of paved asphalt roadways. Public
Works monitors the condition of each roadway segment for deterioration and distress signs
such as cracking, rutting, surface wear, humps, bumps, and sags. KPG was retained to design
overlay projects for the 2019 and 2020 construction years. Included in the contract was a task to
complete a pavement condition assessment and analysis update for all 80.5 centerline miles
(200+ lane miles) of City-owned asphalt roadways. The last time an assessment of the entire
City was completed was 2013. The Council adopted funds for updating the Pavement
Management System in the 2019-2020 budget.
ANALYSIS
In general, the report shows that the City’s road network is in good condition with an average
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 66 and a backlog (roads rated below a PCI of 40) of only
1.3% of the overall network. The average PCI for Tukwila streets is slightly above the national
average of 60-65. The national average of backlog is 12%, putting Tukwila well below that point.
However, the number of Tukwila streets rated as Excellent is only 6% which is lower than the
recommended 15%. This shows Tukwila’s ongoing dedication to maintaining healthy road
conditions.
The pavement ratings range from excellent (a PCI of 85-100), which would be a new roadway
like 42nd Ave S or 53rd Ave S to Good (a PCI of 60-70) such as S 124th St near TCC , to Poor
(PCI 25-40) such as Minkler Blvd, east of Andover Park East.
Roads are also rated by functional class from Principal Arterial (i.e. Southcenter Boulevard),
Minor Arterial (i.e. Andover Park East), Collector (i.e. Macadam Rd S), and Local (i.e. Fort Dent
Way). Functional classification of Tukwila roadways is generally distributed as shown below.
Classification Percent of Network
Principal 5-10%
Minor 10-20%
Collector 5-10%
Local Access 60-80%
57
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Pavement Management
Page 2
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/pw drop box/01 tic agenda/2020 agenda items/tic 10 -05-2020/05. pavement mgmt report/final info memo - 2020 pms report sb dc copy1.docx
Tukwila Pavement Management Inventory by Functional Class
PCI
Principal
Arterial
Minor
Arterial Collector Local
National
Average
Average 65 67 63 65 60
Excellent 85-100 4% 10% 3% 6% 15%
Very Good 70-85 36% 34% 23% 32%
Good 60-70 27% 24% 32% 26%
Fair 50-60 21% 24% 37% 19%
Marginal 40-50 11% 8% 5% 14%
Poor 25-40 1% 0% 0% 3% 15%
Very Poor 0-25 0 0 0 0
Funding of roadway rehabilitation is an exercise in identifying the balance between available
funding and the desired level of service. There are no hard rules for what the definitive level of
funding should be. There are currently no dedicated revenues for roadway rehabilitation and
therefore these have become a General Fund expense in the 104 Fund. Tukwila’s investment in
the road network is estimated to have a replacement value of more than $36M.
The Pavement Management Analysis Report makes the following key recommendations:
• Maintain an average PCI at 60 or better with a backlog of less than 15%
• Routinely resurvey all streets every few years to update conditions and prioritize streets
• Annually review priority overlay streets and costs of overlay to keep the pavement
management system current
• Update the pavement management system with any new streets
• Continue funding routine maintenance activities outside of the overlay program costs.
58
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Pavement Management
Page 3
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2020 Agenda Items/TIC 10 -05-2020/05. Pavement Mgmt Report/Final INFO MEMO - 2020 PMS Report sb dc
copy1.docx
The consultant provided different five-year funding scenarios and the possible impact on PCI
and backlog based on these recommendations. The funding options ranged from $1.05 million
per year to $6.5 million per year. A $1.22 million investment over five years will keep the City
near a PCI of 60 and a backlog of 12%.
Five-year Funding Options and impact on PCI and Backlog
Annual Funding ($M) PCI Backlog
$1.050 59 12%
$1.220 60 11%
$2.420 66 1.30%
$2.800 67 5%
$4.425 75 3%
$6.430 83 1%
The 2019-2020 Adopted CIP included $1.05 million per year for the construction budget
specifically in the Annual Overlay and Repair Program. Due to the impacts of COVID-19, the
City reduced the overlay construction budget to $300,000 in 2020. There are still $800,000 of
estimated projects already designed, but not contracted.
59
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Pavement Management
Page 4
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2020 Agenda Items/TIC 10 -05-2020/05. Pavement Mgmt Report/Final INFO MEMO - 2020 PMS Report sb dc
copy1.docx
In preparing the 2021-2022 Budget, the City looked at the following options.
Option 1: No funding for overlay for two years and deferring all work for two years.
This would most likely increase costs in later years and increase the backlog.
Option 2: Construct the remaining 2020 designed paving projects in 2021 and 2022.
Approximately $400k per year for two years. This takes advantage of the current
project designs and minimizes the costs for two years.
This is estimated to decrease our PCI and increase our backlog, which would
need to be made up in future years.
Option 3: Fund the program with $1.22 M for 2021 and 2022, then increase this amount in
future years beginning in 2023.
This scenario would be most likely to meet the recommendations of keeping PCI
at 60% and keeping our backlog below 15%.
RECOMMENDATION
Accept the Pavement Management Analysis Report recommendations and consider the
proposed funding level of $1.4 million in 2021 and 2022 for the Annual Overlay and Repair
Program. Committee option to forward this presentation to the Committee of the Whole.
ATTACHMENTS
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Select graphics from Report
• Pavement Management Analysis Full Report, August 2020
60
9/30/2020
1
Lower overall cost to
maintain pavement
while still in “good to
fair” condition.
Why do Pavement Management?
Time
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
has a 15% drop in quality
15% of pavement life
$1 spent now
Costs $8 if delayed
Very Good
Good
Very Poor
Poor
Excellent
Fair
40% of pavement life
has a 40% drop in quality
Time
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Target Zone for Pavement Rehabilitation
Pavement Life Cycle Curve
Increased Pavement Life
Understanding the Pavement Condition Index
1
2
61
9/30/2020
2
DATA COLLECTION
SURVEY PROCESS
GIS Cleanup + Inventory
Analysis + Project Planning
QA/QC Survey Data
Data Collection
QA/QC Survey Data
Identifying Distresses
PCI: Good / Fair / Poor
Tukwila Survey
Results
Above Nationwide Avg. 60-65
Backlog =
1.3%
Below Average of 15%
3
4
62
9/30/2020
1
Tukwila Pavement Management Inventory by Classification
Excellent
10%
Very Good
34%
Good
24%
Fair
24%
Marginal
8%
Minor Arterials
Excellent
3%
Very Good
23%
Good
32%
Fair
37%
Marginal
5%
Collector Arterials
Excellent
6%
Very Good
32%
Good
26%
Fair
19%
Marginal
14%
Poor
3%
Local Streets
Excellent
4%
Very Good
36%
Good
27%
Fair
21%
Marginal
11%
Poor
1%
Principal Arterials
Additional Funding Sources are Needed
Maintain PCI at 60 = $1.2M
Maintain Current PCI = $2.4M
Potential Funding
Sources:
•Transportation
Benefit District
•Voter approved levy
•Council-directed
dedicated revenue
source
5
6
63
64
65
66
Tukwila, WA
Pavement Management Analysis Report
August, 2020
City of Tukwila, WA
Attn.: Bryce Corrigan,KPG Project Manager
3131 Elliott Avenue Suite 400
Tukwila, WA 98121
IMS Infrastructure Management Services
8380 S. Kyrene Rd., Suite 101, Tempe, AZ 85283
Phone: (480) 839-4347, Fax: (480) 839-4348
www.imsanalysis.com
67
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS 1
2.0 PRINCIPLES OF PAVEME NT MANAGEMENT 3
2.1 Pavement Preservation 3
2.2 Economic Impacts of Maintenance & Rehabilitation 5
3.0 THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS 6
3.1 Functional Class Review 6
3.2 Assembly of Data into Projects 10
3.3 Field Survey Methodology 12
4.0 TUKWILA SURVEY PAVEMENT CONDITION 14
4.1 Understanding The Pavement Condition Index 14
4.2 Tukwila Network Condition Imagery 15
4.3 Evaluating the Pavement Quality and Backlog 22
4.4 Tukwila Network Condition Distribution 23
4.5 Condition By Functional Classification 27
4.6 Structural and Load Associated Distress Analysis 28
5.0 REHABILITATION PLAN AND BUDGET DEVELOPMENT 30
5.1 Key Analysis Set Points and Pavement Performance Curves 30
5.2 Fix All and Annual Estimates 34
5.3 Network Budget Analysis Models 36
5.4 Post Rehabilitation Condition 39
5.5 True Cost of Underfunding of a Roadway Network 42
5.6 Network Recommendations and Comments 43
APPENDED REPORTS Following Page 43
Appendix A Street Inventory and Condition Summary
Appendix B $1.05M Street Rehabilitation Program by Segment
Appendix C $1.05M Street Rehabilitation Program by Year
Appendix D Full-Sized Maps
68
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page ii
APPENDED MAPS Located on Thumb Drive
Functional Classification by Segment
Pavement Condition Index by Segment
Pavement Condition Rating by Segment Using Descriptive Terms
Assembled Projects
Pavement Condition Rating by Project Using Descriptive Terms
$1.05M/year Rehab Plan Budget
$1.05M/year Post Rehab PCI Map
69
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page iii
Abbreviation
or Acronym Definition
$k Dollars in thousands ($,000)
$M Dollars in millions
%SP Percent Spreadability - component of deflection analysis
AC Asphalt Concrete - asphalt streets, flexible pavements, also known as ACP
ACP Asphalt Concrete Pavement - asphalt streets, flexible pavements, also known as AC
ART Arterial roadway functional classification
ASTM American Society of Testing Methods
Avg Average
BCI Base Curvature Index - component of deflection analysis
Brk Break
CAL Coarse Aggregate Loss
CDV Corrected Deduct Value - part of the ASTM D6433 PCI calculation
COL Collector roadway functional classification
Crk Crack
DeflCON Deflection Condition - structural load analysis based on traffic loading and deflection
DMD Dynamic Maximum Deflection - temperature corrected deflection
Dvdd Slab Divided Slab
DynaCON Dynamic Condition - structural layer analysis
ft or FT Foot
ft2 or FT2 Square foot
FunCL Functional Classification
FWD Falling weight deflectometer
GCI Gravel Condition Index
GFP Good - Fair - Poor
GIS Geographic Information System
GISID GIS segment identification number
H&V Horizontal and Vertical
IRI International Roughness Index
Jt Joint
L&T Longitudinal and Transverse
LAD Load associated distress
LOC Local roadway functional classification - same as RES
LOG Lip of Gutter
m Metre or meter
M Moderate
m2 square metre or square meter
MART Major arterial roadway functional classification
Max Maximum
MaxDV Maximum Deduct Value
MCOL Major collector roadway functional classification
mi or Mi Mile
Min Minimum
MnART Minor arterial roadway functional classification
MnCOL Minor collector roadway functional classification
MOD Moderate
NLAD Non-load associated distress
OCI Overall condition index, also known as PCI
Olay Overlay
PART Primary arterial roadway functional classification
Pavetype Pavement Type
PCC Portland Cement Concrete - concrete streets
PCI Pavement Condition Index - generic term for OCI
R&R Remove and replace
RART Rural arterial roadway functional classification
PWF Priority Weighting Factor
Recon Reconstruction
Rehab Rehabilitation
RES Local roadway functional classification - same as LOC
RI or RCI Roughness Index
S Strong
SART Secondary arterial roadway functional classification
SCI Surface Curvature Index - componenent of deflection analysis
SDI Surface Distress Index
SI Structural Index
STA Station or chainage
Surf Trtmt Surface Treatment
TDV Total Deduct Value
W Weak
70
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
PROJECT SUMMARY
In 2020 IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LLC (IMS) was contracted by the City of Tukwila to
conduct a pavement condition assessment and analysis update on approximately 80.5 centerline miles of
City maintained asphalt roadways.
IMS mobilized their Laser Road Surface Tester (RST) to conduct an objective assessment using industry
standard pavement distress protocols such as those found in ASTM D6433-11. At that time, the City’s
network average Pavement Condition Index was found to be a 66 and the City’s backlog (roads below a
PCI of 40) was at only 1%. See section 4 for more information
Subgrade & Base, 50.1,
34%
Pavements, 33.9, 23%
C&G & Drainage, 21.3,
15%
Sidewalks & Ramps, 24.2,
17%
Signs & Striping, 1.2, 1%
Landscaping, 1.2, 1%
Miscellaneous, 13.2, 9%
City of Tukwila, WA
Total Mileage = 80.5 Miles
Network Valuation (Asset, $M, %)
Total Network Valuation = $145.1M
Cost Per Mile = $1802/Mile
Figure 1- Replacement Value of Roadway Network
As seen in Figure 1, Tukwila has just over 80 centerline miles of roadway, encompassing nearly 1.6M
square yards of pavement surfacing, which is predominantly asphalt. At an average replacement cost for
a typical roadway just over $1.8M per mile, not including the value of the land, the City has over $145M
invested in its paved roadway network.
71
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 2
SUMMARY METRICS OF HEALTH
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) – The PCI score is a ranking assessment on the overall health of a
pavement segment on a scale of 0 to 100. The network average PCI is a good global indicator of a
network’s overall health. (Explained in section 4)
Percent of Excellent Roads – Roads with a condition category of Excellent are those that score
between a PCI of 85 to 100.
Backlog –Backlog is the Very Poor and Poor roads (between a PCI of 0 and 40) that represent a portion
of the network in need of extensive rehabilitation such as full and partial reconstruction. Using sound
pavement management and finance principles, a very healthy network will have a backlog of 10% or less.
Tukwila met two out of three of the metrics for evaluating the quality of its roadway network.
Tukwila’s network average pavement condition score is slightly above the national average
currently seen by IMS of 60 to 65, with the City’s average scoring a 65.6.
o The number of streets rated Excellent is below the minimum recommended target of 15% at 6%
The backlog amount is below the average value of 12% at 1.3%.
BUDGET SCENARIOS
See section 5 for more information
The current annual budget for Tukwila is $1.05M per year dedicated to pavement preservation and
rehabilitation. This will grow the backlog to 12% while reducing the average PCI to a 59 over 5 years.
Please note this number is an annual budget average across all 5 years of the analysis horizon.
The PCI control budget of $1.22M per year and will maintain the network average PCI at a 60 while
increasing the backlog to 11%.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONCLUSION
The Tukwila network has an average PCI of 65.6 and a backlog of 1.3%, with most of the network landing
in the Very Good PCI range. With the City’s existing budget, the network conditions will degrade into the
high 50s PCI range and backlog will continue to grow over time. It is worth noting that the City does have
a fair amount of streets approaching the end of their lifespan where overlays can be effective,
representing a percentage of the network at the steepest part of their deterioration curves.
72
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 3
2.0 PRINCIPLES OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
2.1 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION
Preservation of existing roads and street systems has become a major activity for all levels of
government. Because municipalities must consistently optimize the spending of their budgets, funds that
have been designated for pavement must be used as effectively as possible. The best method to obtain
the maximum value of available funds is through the use of a pavement management system.
Pavement management is the process of planning, budgeting, designing, evaluating, and rehabilitating a
pavement network to provide maximum benefit with available funds.
A pavement management system is a set of tools or methods that assist decision makers in finding
optimal strategies for providing and maintaining pavements in a serviceable condition over a given time
period. The intent is to identify the optimum level of long-term funding to sustain the network at a
predetermined level of service while incorporating local conditions and constraints.
Figure 2 – Pavement Deterioration and Life Cycle Costs
As shown as Figure 2, the streets that are repaired while in good condition will cost less over their lifetime
than those left to deteriorate to a poor condition. Without an adequate routine pavement maintenance
program, streets require more frequent reconstruction, thereby costing millions of extra dollars.
The key to a successful pavement management program is to develop a reasonably accurate
performance model of the roadway, and then identify the optimal timing and rehabilitation strategy. The
resultant benefit of this exercise is realized by the long term cost savings and increase in pavement
quality over time. As illustrated in Figure 2, pavements typically deteriorate rapidly once they hit a specific
threshold. A $1 investment after 40% lifespan is much more effective than deferring maintenance until
heavier overlays or possibly reconstruction are required just a few years later.
73
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 4
Once implemented, an effective pavement information management system can assist agencies in
developing long-term rehabilitation programs and budgets. The key is to develop policies and practices
that delay the inevitable total reconstruction for as long as practical yet still remain within the target zone
for cost effective rehabilitation. That is, as each roadway approaches the steepest part of its deterioration
curve, apply a remedy that extends the pavement life, at a minimum cost, thereby avoiding costly heavy
overlays and reconstruction. Figure 3 illustrates the concept of extending pavement life through the
application of timely rehabilitations.
Figure 3 – Pavement Life Cycle Curve
Ideally, the lower limit of the target zone shown in Figure 3 would have a minimum PCI value in the 60 to
70 range to keep as many streets as possible requiring a thin overlay or less. The upper limit would tend
to fall close to the higher end of the Very Good category – that is a pavement condition score
approaching 85. Other functions of a pavement management system include assessing the effectiveness
of maintenance activities, new technologies, and storing historical data and images.
For Tukwila, a prioritization methodology based on pavement condition, pavement materials, functional
class, and strength rating was used to analyze the network condition and develop the proposed 5 year
rehabilitation plan.
The analysis methodologies and data collection technologies were based on ASTM D6433 Standard
Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys (hereinafter ASTM D6433) for
assessment of pavement surface condition and the International Roughness Index (IRI) for quantification
of pavement roughness on all City streets. These measurements of pavement quality are combined to
form an overall 0 to 100 Pavement Condition Index (PCI), with 100 being the best.
74
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 5
2.2 ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION
The role of the street network as a factor in the City’s well -being cannot be overstated. In the simplest of
terms, roadways form the economic backbone of a community. They provide the means for goods to be
exchanged, commerce to flourish, and commercial enterprises to generate revenue. As such, they are an
investment to be maintained.
The overall condition of an agency’s infrastructure and transportation network is a key indicator of
economic prosperity. Roadway networks, in general, are one of the most important and dynamic sectors
in the global economy. They have a strong influence on not only the economic well-being of a community,
but a strong impact on quality of life. Well -maintained road networks experience multiple socioeconomic
benefits through greater labor market opportunities and decreasing income gap.
As a crucial link between producers and their markets, quality road networks ensure straightforward
access to goods and drive global and local economies. Likewise, higher network quality has a strong
correlation to improvements in household consumption and income. Roads also act as a key element to
social cohesion by acting as a median for integration of bordering regions. This social integration
promotes a decreased gap in income along with diversity and a greater sense of community that can play
a large role in decreasing rates of poverty.
Conversely, deterioration of roads can have adverse effects on a community and may bring about
important and unanticipated welfare effects that the governments should be aware of when cutting
transportation budgets. Poor road conditions increase fuel and tire consumption while shortening intervals
between vehicle repair and maintenance. In turn, these roads result in delayed or more expensive
deliveries for businesses and consumers. Economic effects of poor road networks, such as time
consuming and costly rehabilitation, can be reduced if a proactive maintenance approach is successfully
implemented. To accomplish this, a pavement assessment and analysis should be completed every few
years in an effort update the budget models and rehabilitation plans. As shown below, the IMS Laser
Road Surface Tester (featured in Figure 4) was mobilized to Tukwila to conduct an objective survey.
Figure 4 – Laser Road Surface Tester (RST)
75
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 6
3.0 THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS
3.1 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REVIEW
As part of the scope of this assignment, the functional classification designations currently used in the
Tukwila pavement management program were adopted for their use in the pavement analysis.
Although there is no uniform standard for classifying pavement into functional classes, The Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), American Public Works Association (APWA) and Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) offer some broad guideli nes on how to assign classifications that were
followed in this study.
The City’s functional classification definitions used in the assessment are as follows:
1. Principal Arterial (PART) – all cross City corridors consisting of 2 to 4 or more lanes, generally
spaced at 1 mile intervals with daily traffic counts generally exceeding 20,000 vehicles per day.
Major cross City corridors with a landscaped median were also assigned to Principal Arterials.
2. Minor Arterial (MnART) – Continuous and discontinuous cross city and inter-district corridors
that are 2 to 4 lanes across and generally have a centerline stripe or a designated bus route. The
ADT generally falls in the 10,000 to 20,000 vehicle per day range. They are typically spaced on
the ½ or ¼ mile section line and on occasion, may have a short non-landscaped median.
3. Collector (COL) – Continuous and discontinuous cross City and inter-district corridors that are 2
to 4 lanes across and generally have a centerline stripe or a designated bus route. The ADT
generally falls in the 1,000 to 10,000 vehicle per day range. They are typically spaced on the ½ or
¼ mile section line and on occasion, may have a short non-landscaped median. Major collectors
are also assigned to streets segments leading to, or adjacent to, a major traffic generator site
such as a regional shopping complex. Collectors form the entrance to communities and may have
a decorative landscaped median of short duration.
4. Local (LOC) – These are the majority of the street segments consisting of all residential roads
not defined above or as industrial/commercial.
76
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 7
The paved roadway network consists of 4 functional classes, covering approximately 80.5 miles of
pavement. The average pavement condition index (PCI) of the roadway network is a 65.6 and the
network’s primary pavement type is asphalt. The following table and Figure 5 summarize the functional
classification splits within the system.
77
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 8
Figure 5 – Functional Class Distribution by Mileage
As discussed later in this report, the functional classifications also play a critical role in the rehabilitation
candidate selection process as Arterials are generally given preference over other rehab candidates due
to their higher traffic counts and steeper deterioration curves.
78
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 9
The following figure (Figure 6) highlights the functional classifications used for the Tukwila roadway
network. An electronic version of this map is appended to this report.
Figure 6 – Tukwila Functional Classification Designation
79
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 10
3.2 ASSEMBLY OF DATA INTO PROJECTS
Tukwila’s Geographic Information System (GIS) was used as the basis for segmenting the roadway
network on a block-by-block basis. Each segment was assigned a unique identifier referred to as a
GISID, establishing a one-to-one relationship between the GIS and the street inventory. The segments
form the basic building block of the pavement management system and are where all attribute and
condition data are stored.
The centerline segments were aggregated together within the pavement management system to form
logical projects that the analysis and rehabilitation program are developed against.
Arterial projects run from major intersection to major intersection up to 1 mile in length.
Similar to arterials, collector streets within a neighborhood were aggregated together to form a
single project where practical.
Local streets along a homogenous route were aggregated together along with adjacent side
streets to form a small neighborhood based approach.
Segments were joined only when the pavement condition and functional classification were
homogeneous in nature such that when joined they have a relatively uniform condition that may be
rehabilitated using a single strategy.
The following figure (Figure 7) highlights the projects, used for the analysis. An electronic version of this
map is appended to this report.
80
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 11
Figure 7 – Tukwila Assembled Projects
81
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 12
3.3 FIELD SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Following a set of predefined assessment protocols matching the pavement management software
(ASTM D6433), a specialized piece of survey equipment – referred to as a Laser Road Surface Tester
(Laser RST, pictured on page 5) – is used to collect observations on the condition of the pavement
surface, as well as collect high definition digital imagery and spatial coordinate information. The Laser
RST surveys each local street from end to end in a single pass, while all other roadway classifications are
completed in two passes.
Key pavement condition data elements collected by the Laser RST include:
Surface Distress Index – The Laser RST collects surface distress observations based on the extent and
severity of distresses encountered along the length of the roadway following ASTM D6433 protocols for
asphalt and concrete pavements. The surface distress condition (cracking, potholes, raveling, and the
like) is considered by the traveling public to be the most important aspect in assessing the overall
pavement condition.
Presented on a 0 to 100 scale, the Surface Distress Index (SDI) is an aggregat ion of the observed
pavement defects. Within the SDI, not all distresses are weighted equally. Certain load associated
distresses (caused by traffic loading), such as rutting or alligator cracking on asphalt streets, or divided
slab on concrete streets, have a much higher impact on the surface distress index than non-load
associated distresses such as raveling or patching. Even at low extents and moderate severity – less
than 10% of the total area – load associated distresses can drop the SDI considerably. ASTM D6433 also
has algorithms within it to correct for multiple or overlapping distresses within a segment.
For this project, extent and severity observations were collected, processed, and loaded into the
pavement management software. Within the software, the following distresses, listed in order from
greatest to lowest impact, are presented as a 0 to 10 rating for review and reporting:
Alligator Cracking – Alligator cracking is quantified by the severity of the failure and number of
square feet. Even at low extents, this can have a large impact on the condition score as this
distress represents a failure of the underlying base materials.
Wheel Path Rutting – Starting at a minimum depth of ¼ inch, wheel path ruts are quantified by
their depth and the number of square feet encountered. Like alligator cracking, low densities of
rutting can have a large impact on the final condition score.
Longitudinal, Transverse, Block (Map), and Edge Cracks – These are quantified by their length
and width. Longitudinal cracks that intertwine are the start of alligator cracking.
Patching – Patching is quantified by the extent and quality of patches. When the majority of a
roadway surface is covered by a patch, such as a large utility replacement, the rating of the patch
is minimized. All potholes are rated as patches.
Distortions – All uneven pavement surfaces, such as depressions, bumps, sags, swells, heaves,
and corrugations, are included as distortions and are quantified by the severity and extent of the
affected area.
Raveling – Raveling is the loss of fine aggregate materials on the pavement surface and is
measured by the severity and number of square feet affected.
82
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 13
Bleeding – Bleeding is the presence of free asphalt on the roadway surface caused by too much
asphalt in the pavement or insufficient voids in the matrix. The result is a pavement surface with
low skid resistance and is measured by the amount and severity of the area.
Similar distresses were collected for concrete streets including divided slab, corner breaks, joint
spalling, faulting, polished aggregate, and scaling.
Roughness Index – Roughness is recorded following the industry standard “International Roughness
Index” (IRI), a measure of the change in elevation over a distance expressed as a slope and reported in
millimeters/meter. The IRI value is converted to a 0 to 100 score and reported as the Roughness Index
(RI) as follows:
RI = (11 – 3.5 x ln(IRI)) x 10
ln(IRI) is the natural logarithm of IRI.
In common terms, a newer street would generally have a Roughness Index above 85, while one due for
an overlay would be in the range 40 to 70. Failed streets typically have roughness values below 40.
Structural Index – The network of streets was not tested for structural adequacy, instead, the
relationship between the final pavement condition score and amount of load associated distresses was
analyzed and each pavement section assigned a Weak, Moderate or Strong strength rating. The
assigned structural index (30, 60 or 80 for weak, moderate and strong respectively) was not used in
determining the overall pavement condition score, but simply to classify the pavement strength and aid in
selecting appropriate rehabilitation strategies.
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) – Following our field surveys, the condition data is assembled to create
a single score representing the overall condition of the pavement. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is
calculated as follows:
PCI = 33% Roughness Index + 67% Surface Distress Index
Development of the pavement management plan and budgets were completed using Tukwila - specific
rehabilitation strategies, unit rates, priorities, and pavement performance curves. The process was
iterative in its attempt to obtain the greatest efficiency and cost benefit.
83
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 14
4.0 TUKWILA SURVEY PAVEMENT CONDITION
4.1 UNDERSTANDING THE PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
The following compares the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to commonly used descriptive terms.
Divisions between the terms are not fixed, but are meant to reflect common perceptions of condition.
Figure 8 – Understanding the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Score
The following table details a general description for each of these condition levels with respect to
remaining life and typical rehabilitation actions:
PCI Range
Description
Relative Remaining
Life
Definition
85 – 100 Excellent 15 to 25 Years Like new condition – little to no maintenance required when
new; routine maintenance such as crack and joint sealing.
70 – 85 Very Good 12 to 20 Years Routine maintenance such as patching and crack sealing with
surface treatments such as seal coats or slurries.
60 – 70 Good 10 to 15 Years Heavier surface treatments, chip seals and thin overlays.
Localized panel replacements for concrete.
40 – 60 Marginal to Fair 7 to 12 Years Heavy surface-based inlays or overlays with localized repairs.
Moderate to extensive panel replacements.
25 – 40 Poor 5 to 10 Years Sections will require very thick overlays, surface replacement,
base reconstruction, and possible subgrade stabilization.
0 – 25 Very Poor 0 to 5 Years High percentage of full reconstruction.
84
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 15
4.2 TUKWILA NETWORK CONDITION IMAGERY
The images presented below provide a sampling of the Tukwila streets that fall into the various condition
categories with a discussion of potential rehabilitation strategies.
Very Poor (PCI = 0 to 25) – Complete Reconstruction
62nd Avenue from 151st Street to South 151st Street (GISID 1004, PCI = 25) – Rated as Very Poor, this
street displays spreading base failure as evidenced by the severe alligator cracking and patching. It is
also worth noting that the patching along the left hand side of the street has severely deteriorated as
evident by the alligator cracking surrounding the patched areas. A mill and overlay on this street would
not be suitable as the base has failed and would not meet an extended service life of at least 15 years.
This street requires a full reconstruction and should be carefully monitored.
Deferral of reconstruction of streets rated as Very Poor will not cause a substantial decrease in pavement
quality as the streets have passed the opportunity for overlay-based strategies. Due to the high cost of
reconstruction, Very Poor streets are often deferred until full funding is available in favor of completing
more streets that can be rehabilitated at lower costs, resulting in a greater net benefit to the City. This
strategy however must be sensitive to citizen complaints forcing the street to be selected earlier. In
addition, this type of street can pose a safety hazard for motorists, since severe potholes and distortions
may develop. It is important to consistently monitor these streets and check for potholes or other
structural deficiencies until the street is eventually rebuilt.
85
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 16
Poor (PCI = 25 to 40) – Last Opportunity for Surface Base Rehabilitation
Boeing Access Road from Martin L King Jr Ramp to Martin L King Way (GISID 1975, PCI = 35) –
Rated as Poor, this segment still has some remaining life before it becomes a critical reconstruction need.
As evident in the imagery, most of the cracks have been properly sealed. On this street, the base is
showing signs of failure in areas exhibiting alligator/fatigue cracking. The severely cracked areas are
isolated and do not persist throughout the entire segment length and cross section. These areas should
be dug out and structurally patched to attain the maximum life from any potential rehabilitation efforts. If
left untreated, within a short period of time, a full reconstruction would be required.
On arterial roadways, Poor streets often require partial to full reconstruction – that is removal of the
pavement surface and base down to the subgrade and rebuilding from there. On local roadways, they
require removal of the pavement surface through grinding or excavation, base repairs, restoration of the
curb line and drainage, and then placement of a new surface.
In general, the service life of Poor streets is such that if deferred for too long, it would require a more
costly reconstruction. Streets rated as Poor are typically selected first for rehabilitation as they provide the
greatest cost/benefit to the City – that is the greatest increase in life per rehabilitation dollar spent.
86
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 17
Marginal (PCI = 40 to 50) – Progressively Thicker Overlays
Fun Center Way from East Interurban Avenue to South West Grady Way (GISID 1364, PCI = 48) –
Rated as marginal with a PCI score at the lower range between Marginal and Poor streets. Marginal
streets have distresses that tend to be localized and moderate in nature – that is they do not extend the
full length of the segment and can be readily dug out and repaired. This street segment highlights this
characteristic as the failed area does not quite extend the full length or width of the roadway and is still
serviceable. However, it also highlights the relationship between base and pavement quality. Placing an
overlay on this street without repairing the base would not achieve a full 15 year life as the failure would
continue to occur over time. Structural patching of the failed areas along localized rehabs would permit a
full width grind and inlay on this street segment and return it to full service. The curb lines are straight
and drainage is functioning well.
Marginal streets that display high amounts of load associated distresses are selected as a priority for
rehabilitation as they provide the greatest cost/benefit to the City. If left untreated, Marginal streets with
high amounts of load associated distresses would deteriorate to become partial reconstruction
candidates. Marginal streets that are failing due to materials issues or non-load associated failures may
become suitable candidates for thick overlays if deferred, without a significant cost increase.
87
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 18
Fair (PCI = 50 to 60) – Thin to Moderate Overlays
Interurban Avenue From Macadam Road to Gateway Drive (GISID 1998, PCI = 53) – Rated in the Fair
category, these streets require thin to moderate overlays for asphalt when they enter their need year
(generally within 2-3 points of the lower PCI in the defined range). Several distresses are present, but
tend to be more localized and moderate in severity, and non-load related (primarily longitudinal and
transverse cracking and raveling). On this segment of road, the signs of deterioration are evident in the
right hand travel lane of the pavement and are moderate in severity indicating the base has not yet failed
along the entire length of roadway. The curb line is straight through the sidewalk could benefit from some
preventative maintenance to prevent damage from weed intrusion.
Asphalt streets rated as Fair tend to receive a lower priority when developing a rehabilitation program. If
deferred, the rehabilitation cost would only increase by about $3 to $5/yd2, again depending on the
functional classification, in about 5 to 10 years. This delay represents a 20% difference over the time
stated. Thus, the cost of deferral is low when compared to deferring a thick overlay to a reconstruction
with a two to threefold increase in cost.
88
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 19
Good (PCI = 60 to 70) – Surface Treatments to Thin Overlays
Macadam Road from 149th Lane to 150th Street (GISID 2064, PCI = 62) – Rated as Good with the
primary cause of deterioration the transverse and longitudinal cracking, as well as patching. It also
displays small amounts of load associated distresses that can easily be removed to restore the visual
appearance of the roadway. The existing cracks should be sealed and the pavement surface restored,
with a heavier surface treatment such as microsurfacing or double slurry to fully waterproof the pavement
and cover the crack sealant. The occasional dig out and replacement may be required to correct
localized deficiencies. Alternatively, depending on the extent of the distressed areas, base strength and
drainage, a thin overlay may be applied.
Asphalt streets rated as Good are ideal candidates for thinner surface-based rehabilitations and local
repairs. Depending on the amount of localized failures, a thin edge mill and overlay, or possibly a surface
treatment, would be a suitable rehabilitation strategy for streets rated as Good. Streets that fall in the high
60 - low 70 PCI range provide the greatest opportunity for extending
pavement life at the lowest possible cost, thus applying the principles
of the perpetual life cycle approach to pavement maintenance. The
adjacent photo is a great example of a street segment (not a Tukwila
Road) that displayed low load associated distresses and thus, high
structural characteristics, and once the distressed areas were
replaced, a slurry seal was applied. The patching accounted for less
than 5 to 10% of the total area and resulted in a good looking,
watertight final surface at a much lower cost than an overlay with less
disruption to the neighborhood and curb line. The patches were
paver laid and roller compacted.
89
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 20
Very Good (PCI = 70 to 85) – Surface Treatments and Localized Rehabilitation
West Valley Highway from Strander Boulevard to 180th Street (GISID 1293, PCI = 73) – Rated as
Very Good, this road displays minor amounts of transverse cracking and patching. The surface is non-
weathered, and the base is still strong. This street is an example of a candidate for preventative
maintenance and light weight surface treatments to extend the life of a roadway.
Asphalt streets rated as Very Good generally need lightweight surface-based treatments such as surface
seals, slurries, chip seals or microsurfacing. Routine maintenance such as crack sealing and localized
repairs often precede surface treatments. The concept is to keep the cracks as waterproof as possible
through crack sealing and the application of a surface treatment. By keeping water out of the base layers,
the pavement life is extended without the need for thicker rehabilitations such as overlays or
reconstruction. Surface treatments also tend to increase surface friction and visual appearance of the
pavement surface but do not add structure or increase smoothness.
Surface treatments may include:
Double or single application of slurry seals (slurries are a sand and asphalt cement mix).
Microsurfacing – asphalt cement and up to 3/8 sand aggregate.
Chip seals and cape seals (Chip seal followed by a slurry).
Additional cost benefits of early intervention include:
Less use of non-renewable resources through thinner rehabilitation strategies.
Less intrusive rehabilitation and easier to maintain access during construction.
Easier to maintain existing drainage patterns.
90
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 21
Excellent (PCI = 85 to 100)
Southcenter Parkway (GISID 1343, PCI = 93) – Rated as Excellent, displaying little to no surface
distresses. The ride is smooth and the surface is non-weathered and the base is strong. In a couple of
years, this street segment would be an ideal candidate for routine maintenance activities such as crack
sealant rehabilitation.
In terms of pavement management efficiency, a program based on worst-first, that is starting at the lowest
rated street and working up towards the highest, does not achieve optimal expenditure of money.
Generally, under this scenario, agencies can not sufficiently fund pavement rehabilitation and lose ground
despite injecting large amounts of capital into the network.
The preferred basis of rehabilitation candidate selection is to examine the cost of deferral of a street,
against increased life expectancy.
c
91
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 22
4.3 EVALUATING THE PAVEMENT QUALITY AND BACKLOG
The concept of the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score, backlog percentage and number of streets
rated as Excellent must be fully understood in order to understand and develop an effective pavement
management program. These three metrics should fall into certain ranges in order to measure the quality
and long term viability of a network.
The PCI score indicates the overall pavement condition and represents the amount of equity in the
system; it is the value most commonly considered when gaugi ng the overall quality of a roadway network.
It may also be used to define a desired level of service: that is, an agency may wish to develop a
pavement management program such that in five years the overall network score meets a set minimum
value. Obviously, the higher the PCI score the better off the overall network condition is. Agencies with
an average PCI score above 80 (when considering surface distress, roughness and possibly strength) are
rare and found only in a few select communities. Less than 1 in 20 communities surveyed by IMS have
that high of a condition average. Averages between 65 and 80 are indicative of either newer networks, or
ones that have an ongoing pavement rehabilitation program and tend to be fully funded. Scores between
60 and 65 are common and represent a reasonable average providing a satisfactory balance between
levels of service and funding, and when taken with the other two metrics may represent a well -managed
and funded network. A minimum score of 60 means that overall the network falls at the lower end of the
range where light weight surface treatments and thin overlays are the standard rehabilitation practice.
Below a 60 means an agency has to rely on more costly rehabilitations and reconstructions to address
condition issues.
At the upper end of the condition scale, a minimum of 15% of the network should be rated as Excellent.
Generally, at or above 15%, means that a noticeable percentage of the roadway network is in like new
condition, requiring only routine maintenance. While higher percentages of streets rated as Excellent are
certainly desirable, the annual cost to maintain rates at higher multiples is often cost prohibitive. Below
15% means the agency is struggling to effectively rehabilitate their network on an annual basis. The 15%
marker represents a cost effective balance between annual investment and satisfactory level of service.
Backlog roadways are those that have dropped sufficiently in quality to the point where surface based
rehabilitation efforts would no longer prove to be cost effective. These roadways are rated Poor or Very
Poor and will require either partial or total reconstruction. Backlog is expressed as the percentage of
roads requiring reconstruction as compared to the network totals.
It is the backlog, however, that defines the amount of legacy work an agency is facing and is willing to
accept in the future. It is the combination of the three metrics that presents the true picture of the
condition of a roadway network, and conversely defines improvement goals.
Generally, a backlog of 10% to 15% of the overall network is considered manageable from a funding point
of view with 12% being a realistic target. Fifteen percent (15%) is used as a control limit to indicate the
maximum amount of backlog that can be readily managed. Backlog rates below 10%, again are certainly
desirable, but financially unachievable for a large percentage of agencies. Backlogs approaching 20% or
more tend to become unmanageable, unless aggressively checked through larger rehabilitation
programs, and will grow at an alarming rate. At 20% a tipping point has been met and the backlog tends
to increase faster than an agency’s ability to reconstruct their streets.
92
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 23
4.4 TUKWILA NETWORK CONDITION DISTRIBUTION
Figure 9 presented below shows the distribution of pavement condition for the roadway network in
Tukwila. The average PCI for the network is 65.6. While direct comparisons to other agencies are difficult
due to variances in ratings systems, Tukwila is slightly above average when compared to other agencies
recently surveyed by IMS, which typically fall in the 60 to 65 range.
Figure 9 – Roadway Network Present Status
This is reflective of a moderately aged network that has had some roadway renewal effort.
Simultaneously, the City has a moderate sample of streets that are approaching the end of their
life where surface based rehabilitations, such as overlays, can be effective.
Traditionally we expect to see a bell curve that is skewed to the right and centered between a PCI
of 60 and 70. The Tukwila network curve illustrated above follows this norm and shows the
positive impact of recent roadway renewal effort over the last several years.
93
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 24
The following graph (Figure 10) plots the same pavement condition information, but instead of using the
actual Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value, descriptive terms are used to classify the roadways.
Six percent (6%) of the network can be considered in Excellent condition and require only routine
maintenance.
Thirty-two percent (32%) of the network falls into the Very Good classification. These are roads
that benefit most from preventative maintenance techniques such as microsurfacing, slurry seals
and localized panel repairs.
Thirty-two percent (32%) of the streets are rated as Good and are candidates for lighter surface-
based rehabilitations such as thin overlays or slight panel replacements.
Twenty-four percent (34%) of network can be considered Fair to Marginal condition representing
candidates for progressively thicker overlay-based rehabilitation or panel replacements. If left
untreated, they will decline rapidly into reconstruction candidates.
The remaining one percent (1%) of the network is rated as Poor or Very Poor, meaning these
roadways have failed or are past their optimal due point for overlay or surface-based
rehabilitation and may require progressively heavier or thicker forms of rehabilitation (such as
extensive panel replacement, surface reconstruction or deep patch and paving) or total
reconstruction.
Figure 10 – Roadway Network Present Status Using Descriptive Terms
94
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 25
Figures 11 and 12 present the surveyed condition of the streets using PCI and Good-Fair-Poor
descriptive terms, respectively. Electronic versions of these maps are appended to this report.
Figure 11 – Tukwila by Segment Using Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
95
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 26
Figure 12 – Tukwila Pavement Condition by Segment Using Descriptive Terms
96
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 27
4.5 CONDITION BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Figure 13 highlights the pavement condition distribution for the arterial, collector, and local streets. Keep
in mind that arterial roadways, the streets that have the majority of traffic use and link various parts of the
city together, may be considered the thoroughfares of the city and during the budget development
process, should receive the highest priority when selecting rehabilitation candidates.
The principal arterial network has an average PCI of 65
The minor arterial network has an average PCI of 67
The collector network has an average PCI of 63
The local network has an average PCI of 65
Figure 13 – Condition Rating by Functional Classification
97
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 28
4.6 STRUCTURAL AND LOAD ASSOCIATED DISTRESS ANALYSIS
Structural testing and analysis was not performed for the City of Tukwila. Instead, analysis of the cause
of pavement failure for these street segments was completed by examining the types of distresses that
have caused the PCI score to drop.
Surface distresses may be categorized into two classifications – load associated distresses (LADD) and
non-load associated distresses (NLAD). Load associated distresses are those that are directly related to
traffic loading and structural capacity. Non-load associated distresses are those that result from materials
or environmental issues including shrinkage (transverse) cracking, bleeding and raveling. Generally, load
associated distresses affect the overall condition score more than non-load associated distresses – as is
the case in Tukwila. For asphalt streets, roadways were classified as Weak, Moderate, or Strong.
The purpose of the structural analysis is twofold:
The structural analysis provides input into which performance curve each segment is to use –
performance curves are used to predict pavement deterioration over time.
Structural analysis assists in rehabilitation selection by constraining inadequate pavement
sections from receiving too light of a rehabilitation and conversely, identifying segments suitable
for lighter weight treatment.
Figure 14 plots the relationship of the load associated distresses (shown in red) against pavement
condition. As can be seen from the plot, at higher PCI scores, most pavements fall into the moderate
strength classification as the distresses have not yet begun to manifest themselves into severe failures.
As the PCI score drops, the load associated distresses typically affect the PCI score to a higher degree
with more segments being classified as weak. Conversely, segments that have a declining PCI score
and low LADD, are classified as strong as they display few load associated failures. High PCI score
(above 60) rehab selections should focus on pavement preservation activities such as surface treatments
or thin overlays, possibly with some localized pavem ent repairs and crack sealing.
The sum of the Load-Associated Distress deducts (LADD) is also used to qualify the appropriate
rehabilitation strategy selection in addition to the overall pavement condition score. For example, a street
that has a good PCI score (that is between 60 and 70) and is displaying relatively low load associated
distress deducts would be a suitable candidate for a surface treatment in place of a thin overlay in that the
PCI score is more influenced by materials issues such as transverse cracking or raveling.
Overall, the low amounts of streets exhibiting weak performance can generally be attributed to poor
subgrade conditions, insufficient pavement thickness and increased traffic loading – in particular heavy,
side-loading garbage and recycling trucks (an unintended consequence of green initiatives) along with
school buses and delivery vehicles. The average weight of these vehicles coupled with tire pressure and
configuration today compared to those from a few decades ago has increased drastically.
98
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 29
The upper black diagonal line identifies segments that have a high ratio of load associated
distresses compared to their PCI score. These segments are classified as weak.
The lower black diagonal line identifies segments that have a l ow ratio of load associated
distresses compared to their PCI score and are classified as strong.
Segments that fall between the two lines are assigned a moderate pavement strength.
The sum of the Load-Associated Distress deducts (LADD) is also used to qualify the appropriate
rehabilitation strategy selection in addition to the overall pavement condition score.
Figure 14 – Pavement Condition Index versus Sum of Distress Deducts
99
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 30
5.0 REHABILITATION PLAN AND BUDGET DEVELOPMENT
5.1 KEY ANALYSIS SET POINTS AND PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE CURVES
Pavement management analysis requires user inputs in order to complete its condition forecasting and
prioritization. A series of operating parameters were developed in order to create an efficient program
that is tailored to the City’s needs.
Some of the highlights include:
The pavement performance curves that are used to predict future pavement condition. Asphalt
streets are classified as weak, moderate, or strong, and then assigned the appropriate pavement
performance curve based on their functional classification to use in the analysis. The concept of
load associated distresses does not apply to concrete streets.
The shape of performance curves reflect the concept of deferred maintenance and salvage life.
Instead of dropping to an absolute PCI value of 0 after 40 years of service, the curves are
designed to become asymptotic to the age axis and have a whole life of approximately 50 to 60
years depending on pavement type. This indicates the notion that once a street deteriorates past
a specific threshold – about a PCI of 20, age becomes less important in rehab selection.
Priority ranking analysis uses prioritization for rehabilitation candidate selection. It is designed to
capture as many segments in their need year based on the incremental cost of deferral. The
higher the functional classification of a street, the higher priority a segment is given.
Rehabilitation Strategies and Unit Rates
The rehab strategies and unit rates used in the pavement analysis can be found on the following page.
Some important parameters include:
Rehab Code and Activity – The assigned identifier and name to each rehabilitation strategy.
The term “RR” refers to “Remove and Replace”, otherwise known as Structural Patching. When
this term is present, additional funds have been assigned to the strategy to allow for an increased
amount of preparation work and patching. The relative terms of thin, moderate and thick are
used to describe the overlay thickness. This is to facilitate consistency in the naming convention,
but does not imply the same material thickness has to be used for each functional classification.
The recommended rehab activities for any given PCI range may vary due to pavement strength
and functional classification. For example, an arterial between a PCI of 50 to 60 may receive a
thin to moderate overlay, while a local access road may only receive a chip seal or thin overlay.
Unit Rates – The rehab costs are presented on a per square yard basis for each pavement type,
functional class, and rehabilitation activity combination. The rates were developed using typical
national averages for similar activities and adjusted for Tukwila’s location and unique conditions.
An additional burden to all costs was also added to cover City overheads, design and engineering
and inspection. Costs for peripheral concrete rehab (valley gutters, inlets, approaches, etc.) have
not been included in the analysis.
100
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 31
The unit rates are reflected in the network value, final budgets, and average cost/mile for doing
work in Tukwila.
Figure 15 – Rehab rates by Functional Class
*Unit rates vary slightly between functional classes
Min PCI, Critical PCI, and Max PCI – These define the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) range
applicable to the rehab selection. The Critical PCI defines when a segment is in its need year and is
deemed to be critical, otherwise if deferred, the street declines in PCI past the point which the
rehabilitation is no longer appropriate. Generally the Critical PCI falls 2 to 4 points higher than the
minimum PCI applicable for each rehab activity.
101
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 32
Figure 16 graphically presents the application of pavement rehabilitations for asphalt streets by PCI. The
Rehab numbers are simply placeholders that separate each rehabilitation project identified on the chart
above. For example, Rehab 56 is a Thick Overlay + Structural Patch.
Unit rates increase slightly between functional classes to reflect increase costs in pavement thickness,
traffic control, and striping.
Figure 16 – Asphalt (ACP) Rehabilitation Strategies
Selection and Prioritization of Rehab Candidates
The City’s pavement management program incorporates a series of user defined values to prioritize and
select the street segments for rehabilitation. The rehab selection order is not worst first, but rather
designed to capture as many segments in their need year based on the incremental cost of rehab
deferral. A Street is considered to be in its need year when it has reached its maximum service life and
any further deferral would require a heavier and more costly rehabilitation. The rehab program has been
designed to maximize the increased service life for each rehabilitation dollar spent on a segment.
Other factors included in the prioritization process focus on:
Need Year – st reets are only selected when they have expended their service life and are optimal
for rehab selection.
102
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 33
Functional Classification – generally priority is given to higher functional classifications as they
provide greater benefits to a larger group of users
Pavement Strength – weaker streets are prioritized higher than stronger ones as they
deteriorate faster.
Area – a very slight increase in priority is given to larger projects over smaller ones.
The net result is a program that favors thick overlays, followed by partial reconstruction projects then full
reconstruction projects (more for safety reasons than cost-benefit). These are then followed by surface
treatments and lastly by moderate to thin overlays.
The programmed deterioration curves illustrated in Figure 17 are designed to integrate the pavement
condition distribution performance curves for the network, with the applied rehabilitation strategies and
their expected life cycle. Different color performance curves are meant to represent the full suite of curves
assigned to segments based upon their functional class, pavement type, and strength.
It is important to recognize that even though all streets fall into specific rating categories and their
respective rehabilitation strategies, it is not until a street falls to within a few points of the lower end of the
range that it will become a critical need selected for rehabilitation.
Figure 17 - Performance Curves
103
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 34
5.2 FIX ALL AND ANNUAL ESTIMATES
Three different approaches may be taken to identify and confirm the amount of funds the City needs to
set aside each year to maintain the roadway network at its current condition. All three are completed
externally to the pavement management system and are simply used to validate the final results.
Option 1 – Estimated Life Cycle Cost Based on Network Value
An approximate value for the annual street maintenance budget may be quickly determined by taking the
total value of Tukwila’s roadway network, estimated at $145M, and dividing that by the ultimate life of a
roadway – approximated to be 50 years. By this method, the annual budget is estimated at $2,900,000.
Please note, the 50 year lifespan of the roadway is the theoretical life of the roadway surface from
construction, until the point at which there not usable surface remaining, it is not simply the lifespan of the
pavement surface until the next overlay.
Option 2 – Estimated Life Cycle Cost Based on Current Condition
A second method to validate the annual budget is to identify the average network PCI and associated
rehabilitation requirements, and then estimate the number of miles required to be rehabilitated each year
based on a typical life cycle for that rehabilitation activity. For Tukwila, the average PCI for asphalt roads
is 66, which places the Tukwila asphalt network in the Edge Mill + Thin Overlay, at an average cost of
$23.55/yd2. Based on this estimate the City needs to spend approximately $2,107,337/year to maintain
the current condition average.
104
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 35
Option 3 – Estimated Life Cycle Cost Based on Network Deficiency
The third methodology to confirm the required amount of annual funding is to identify the current network
deficiency, that is the amount required to rehabilitate all streets in the network assuming unlimited
funding, and then div ide by the typical life cycle of each rehabilitation activity. This is referred to as the
Fix All Estimate and Life Cycle Cost. The rehab strategies listed in the table are generic in nature and not
necessarily the final set that was applied to Tukwila. For Tukwila, the Fix All Estimate for the network
deficiency is approximately $34M and the Life Cycle Cost is $1.97M/year, broken down as follows:
105
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 36
5.3 NETWORK BUDGET ANALYSIS MODELS
An analysis containing a total of 10 profile budget runs plus a Do Nothing options was prepared for
Tukwila.
The analysis results are summarized below:
Do Nothing (illustrated in Figure 20) – This option identifies the effect of spending no capital for 5
years. After 5 years, this scenario results in a network average PCI drop from a 66 to a 54 and a
dramatic increase in backlog to 17%
Client Budget (Green Line) – this represents the City’s current annual budget of $1.05M annually
dedicated to pavement preservation and rehabilitation. This level of funding will result in a
network average PCI score of 59 and a backlog increase to 12%.
Steady State PCI – this is simply the funds required to maintain the current network average PCI
at a 66. The annual budget required to do so is on the order of $2.42M annually, however
backlog (Very Poor & Poor roadways) continues to climb to 6%.
Backlog Control Budget – A budget designed to maintain the City’s current backlog at 5%.
The results of the analysis are summarized in Figure 18 below. The X-axis highlights the annual budget,
while the Y-axis plots the 5 Year Post Rehab Network Average PCI value. The diagonal blue line is the
results of the pavement analysis (the Tukwila model profile).
Figure 18 – 5 Year Post Rehab Network PCI Analysis Results
106
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 37
Figure 19 presents the resultant network backlog against annual budget. Similar to Figure 18, but
instead of plotting the average PCI score, the blue diagonal line represents the total backlog after 5 years.
The lower the backlog the better, with a maximum of 12% recommended
Figure 19 – 5 Year Post Rehab Network Backlog Results
107
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 38
Figure 20 presents the analysis results on an annual basis. This shows that if the budget falls below
$2.42M/year (Steady State Budget), over time the overall condition of the roads will deteriorate as
backlog continues to grow.
Figure 20– 5 Year Annual PCI
108
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 39
5.4 POST REHABILITATION CONDITION
The following figure (Figure 21) compares the current network condition distribution (red) against what
the 5-year post rehabilitation distribution would be at with a budget of $1.05M/year (blue) As can be seen
in the plot, the Tukwila budget will reduce the overall network’s PCI average and increase the amount of
roads rated as Marginal and Poor.
Figure 21 – Five-Year Post Rehabilitation Condition Distribution
Three metrics are used to evaluate the quality of a roadway network, they are:
Average Condition – should be between 60 and 65 at a minimum
Percentage of Backlog – target 12%, should be less than 15%, must be less than 20%
Percentage of Streets Rated as Excellent – should be greater than 15%
109
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 40
Figures 22 and 23 present the current Tukwila recommended budget network rehabilitation plan by year
and activity. Electronic versions of these maps are appended to this report.
Figure 22 – $1.05M/Year Rehabilitation Plan by Activity and Year
110
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 41
Figure 23 – $1.05M/Year Post Rehabilitation PCI by Segment
111
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 42
5.5 TRUE COST OF UNDERFUNDING OF A ROADWAY NETWORK
Funding of roadway rehabilitation is an ex ercise in identifying the balance between available funding and
the desired level of service that is right for each agency. There are no hard rules for what is the definitive
level of funding as this is a decision for local elected officials, based on their priorities and practices.
However, the true costs of over and underfunding must be presented in order to provide decision makers
with all the information available to base the decisions upon. Tukwila has a considerable investment in
their paved roadway network with a combined replacement value (just for the streets, not right of way)
exceeding $36M. Spreading this cost over a 50 year period (the expected ultimate life of a roadway)
means that an annual investment on the order of $2.42M per year would be required – not including the
cost of maintenance, deterioration ,repair curbing, drainage, tree roots, sidewalks or ADA ramps.
Government Accounting Standards Board Statement 34 requires that agencies who collect taxes (local,
business, property or gas taxes) for the purpose of maintaining long term infrastructure assets (such as
roads) be good stewards of those assets by either accounting for them financially on the City’s balance
sheet, or implement a methodology to manage and fund them to a locally def ined level of service.
The condition of a roadway network may be equated to equity in a depreciating asset. Regular payments
to that asset must be made in order to maintain the equity at a constant level. Should those payments fall
short, the equity must eventually be replaced through a large influx of capital in order to make the
investment whole again. Roadway networks are no different. Long term underfunding of rehabilitation
and maintenance is the direct equivalent of removing equity from an asset – eventually it must be repaid
through total reconstruction. The following table compares the real cost of the various budgets against
the Do Nothing and Steady State options.
112
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Tukwila_Report_Draft Page 43
5.6 NETWORK RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
The following recommendations are presented to Tukwila as an output from the pavement analysis, and
must be read in conjunction with the attached reports.
1. Tukwila should adopt a policy statement to maintain PCI at or above a 60 while keeping backlog
below 15%.
An annual budget of $1.05M (dedicated to pavement rehabilitation) will achieve a network
average PCI of 59 and backlog of 12%.
An annual budget of $2.42M (dedicated to pavement rehabilitation) will achieve a network
average PCI of 66 and backlog of 6%.
2. The full suite of proposed rehabilitation strategies and unit rates should be reviewed annually as
these can have considerable effects on the final program.
3. No allowance has been made for network growth. As the City expands or increases the amount of
paved roads, increased budgets will be required.
4. No allowance has been made for routine maintenance activities such as asphalt crack sealing,
pothole filling, sweeping, striping or patching within the budget runs and analysis. These costs are
assumed to be outside the pavement management costs.
5. The City should resurvey their streets every few years to update the condition data and
rehabilitation program.
113
Appendix A
Street Inventory and Condition Summary
114
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
2161 102nd St 27th Ave S DS@644E 27th Ave S Local 19 644 68 1,428 61 54 60 59 Mod Fair 30 9 58
1457 104th Pl WEST END Martin L King Jr Way S Local 19 751 79 1,665 77 57 60 70 Mod V Good 16 7 70
1013 104th Pl 47th Ave S DS@188E 47th Ave S Local 20 188 21 439 84 65 60 77 Mod V Good 15 1 77
1425 104th St 27th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local 20 977 109 2,280 54 57 60 55 Mod Fair 36 10 54
1118 107th St S Ryan Way EAST END Local 20 302 34 705 43 45 60 43 Mod Marginal 35 23 43
1278 107th St 49th Ave S Beacon Ave S Local 22 471 58 1,209 92 77 60 87 Mod Excellent 5 3 86
1119 107th St Beacon Ave S 51st Ave S Local 22 130 16 334 82 63 60 76 Mod V Good 14 5 75
1940 109th St 50th Ave S Beacon Ave S Local 22 217 27 557 89 70 60 83 Mod V Good 4 6 82
1285 112th St WEST END Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 22 778 95 1,997 60 68 60 62 Mod Good 27 14 62
1286 112th St Tukwila Intl Blvd East Marginal Way S Collector 35 995 193 4,063 71 64 60 69 Mod Good 22 7 68
1284 112th St 50th Ave S 51st Ave S Local 20 294 33 686 74 53 60 67 Mod Good 22 4 66
1039 113th St WEST END 41st Ave S Local 20 475 53 1,108 50 31 60 44 Mod Marginal 42 8 43
1988 113th St WEST END 51st Ave S Local 20 345 38 805 72 50 60 65 Mod Good 25 2 65
1444 114th St 40th Ave S 41st Ave S Local 22 219 27 562 72 50 60 65 Mod Good 17 10 65
1442 114th St 41st Ave S EAST END Local 22 148 18 380 93 81 60 89 Mod Excellent 1 6 89
1441 114th St 49th Ave S 51st Ave S Local 22 918 112 2,356 91 74 60 85 Mod Excellent 5 4 85
1057 115th St East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S Collector 33 1,096 201 4,220 66 68 60 67 Mod Good 27 7 66
1058 115th St 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Collector 32 764 136 2,852 79 72 60 77 Mod V Good 18 3 76
1059 115th St 42nd Ave S NE END Local 19 209 22 463 73 51 60 66 Mod Good 23 4 65
1338 116th St WEST END East Marginal Way S Local 19 1,114 118 2,469 49 53 60 51 Mod Fair 35 15 50
2100 116th St East Marginal Way S 35th Ln S Local 19 226 24 501 68 54 60 64 Mod Good 25 7 63
2102 116th St 35th Ln S 39th Ave S Local 19 488 52 1,082 75 70 30 73 Weak V Good 22 3 73
1628 116th St 43rd Pl S 42nd Ave S Local 19 363 38 805 69 47 60 61 Mod Good 19 12 61
1596 117th St 39th Ave S 40th Ave S Local 20 315 35 735 87 68 60 81 Mod V Good 9 4 80
2098 118th St 44th Ave S 44th Pl S Local 20 94 10 219 90 70 60 83 Mod V Good 0 11 83
1690 118th St 44th Pl S EAST END Local 20 201 22 469 54 24 60 44 Mod Marginal 35 11 44
1360 119th St 40th Ave S 40th Pl S Local 20 240 27 560 86 67 60 80 Mod V Good 8 5 79
1370 119th St 40th Pl S EAST END Local 21 224 26 549 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 1 11 81
1229 122nd Ln 50th Ave S 51st Pl S Local 21 338 39 828 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 12 5 77
1440 122nd St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Local 21 334 39 818 66 53 60 62 Mod Good 28 6 61
1432 122nd St 43rd Ave S 44th Ave S Local 21 152 18 372 60 58 60 59 Mod Fair 31 9 59
1430 122nd St 44th Ave S 44th Ave S Local 22 98 12 252 74 57 60 68 Mod Good 21 5 67
1435 122nd St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Local 22 252 31 647 90 71 60 83 Mod V Good 8 3 83
1061 122nd St 45th Ave S 46th Ave S Local 22 190 23 488 89 70 60 82 Mod V Good 8 4 82
1671 122nd St 46th Ave S 46th Ave S Local 22 54 7 139 69 60 60 66 Mod Good 21 10 65
1431 122nd St 46th Ave S 47th Ave S Local 22 248 30 637 84 74 60 81 Mod V Good 11 4 81
1434 122nd St 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Local 19 255 27 565 86 75 60 82 Mod V Good 12 2 82
1436 122nd St 48th Ave S 44th Pl S Local 19 187 20 415 97 89 60 94 Mod Excellent 0 3 94
1433 122nd St 44th Pl S 49th Ave S Local 19 63 7 140 100 90 60 97 Mod Excellent 0 0 96
1106 122nd St 49th Ave S 51st Pl S Local 19 130 14 288 93 80 60 89 Mod Excellent 4 3 88
1417 124th St 35th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local 19 718 76 1,592 38 46 60 41 Mod Marginal 35 17 40
1502 124th St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Collector 35 273 53 1,115 91 72 60 84 Mod V Good 6 3 84
1505 124th St 43rd Ave S 44th Ave S Collector 35 244 47 996 84 71 60 80 Mod V Good 11 5 79
1990 124th St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Collector 35 257 50 1,049 80 72 60 77 Mod V Good 15 5 77
1993 124th St 45th Ave S 46th Ave S Collector 35 243 47 992 83 71 60 79 Mod V Good 12 5 79
1414 124th St 46th Ave S 47th Ave S Collector 34 249 47 988 87 79 60 84 Mod V Good 9 4 84
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 1 of 17115
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1991 124th St 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Collector 34 254 48 1,008 75 82 30 77 Weak V Good 19 6 77
1816 124th St 48th Ave S 49th Ave S Collector 34 253 48 1,004 73 77 30 75 Weak V Good 21 6 74
1553 124th St 49th Ave S 50th Pl S Collector 34 253 48 1,004 76 67 60 73 Mod V Good 18 6 72
1336 124th St 50th Pl S 51st Pl S Local 20 409 45 954 83 64 60 77 Mod V Good 12 5 76
1310 125th St 46th Ave S 50th Pl S Local 20 1,156 128 2,697 86 68 60 80 Mod V Good 12 2 80
1373 126th St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local 20 405 45 945 95 84 60 91 Mod Excellent 3 2 91
1512 126th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local 20 419 47 978 84 66 60 78 Mod V Good 12 3 78
1643 126th St 37th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local 20 549 61 1,281 57 37 60 51 Mod Fair 30 13 50
1366 126th St 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Local 20 317 35 740 76 55 60 69 Mod Good 18 6 68
1905 128th St Military Rd S CITY LIMIT Local 22 653 80 1,676 100 90 60 97 Mod Excellent 0 0 96
1906 128th St WEST END 35th Ave S Local 22 218 27 560 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 14 7 72
1903 128th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local 22 409 50 1,050 94 82 60 90 Mod Excellent 3 3 89
1242 128th St 37th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local 22 786 96 2,017 78 58 60 71 Mod V Good 17 5 71
1241 128th St East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S Local 19 87 9 193 51 36 60 46 Mod Marginal 30 19 46
1455 128th St 40th Ave S Macadam Rd S Local 19 854 90 1,893 71 52 60 64 Mod Good 21 9 64
1549 130th Pl 50th Pl S 56th Ave S Local 22 1,828 223 4,692 67 65 60 66 Mod Good 26 7 66
1280 130th Pl 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Local 22 270 33 693 92 78 60 88 Mod Excellent 0 8 87
1170 130th St 32nd Ave S 33rd Ave S Local 22 335 41 860 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 13 3 77
1141 130th St 33rd Pl S 34th Ave S Local 22 99 12 254 87 68 60 81 Mod V Good 10 4 80
1857 130th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 35th Ave S Local 22 215 26 552 61 34 60 52 Mod Fair 32 8 51
1635 130th St 35th Ave S 35th Ln S Local 25 284 39 828 58 50 60 55 Mod Fair 30 12 55
1387 130th St 35th Ln S 37th Ave S Local 25 121 17 353 91 72 60 85 Mod V Good 6 3 84
1155 130th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S Local 25 237 33 691 87 68 60 81 Mod V Good 10 3 80
2093 130th St 38th Ave S 38th Ln S Local 25 261 36 761 90 70 60 84 Mod V Good 5 4 83
2095 130th St 38th Ln S East Marginal Way S Local 25 282 39 823 65 38 60 56 Mod Fair 25 10 56
1381 130th St East Marginal Way S 41st Ave S Local 25 285 40 831 76 56 60 69 Mod Good 15 8 69
1140 130th St 41st Ave S Macadam Rd S Local 25 493 68 1,438 80 61 60 74 Mod V Good 11 9 73
1893 131st Pl 41st Ave S Macadam Rd S Local 20 527 59 1,230 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 13 3 77
1186 131st Pl Macadam Rd S 44th Ave S Local 20 336 37 784 82 63 60 76 Mod V Good 15 3 75
1185 131st Pl 44th Ave S 44th Ave S Local 20 133 15 310 62 37 60 54 Mod Fair 24 14 53
1007 132nd Pl S 132nd Pl S 132nd Pl Local 19 214 23 474 54 23 60 43 Mod Marginal 33 14 43
1917 132nd Pl NW END 38th Pl S Local 19 180 19 399 91 71 60 84 Mod V Good 7 2 84
2097 132nd Pl 38th Pl S 40th Ave S Local 19 285 30 632 65 38 60 56 Mod Fair 26 9 56
1616 132nd St 33rd Ave S 34th Ave S Collector 35 332 65 1,356 62 72 30 65 Weak Good 31 8 65
2005 132nd St 34th Ave S 34th Ln S Collector 34 248 47 984 48 62 60 53 Mod Fair 41 10 52
2006 132nd St 34th Ln S 35th Ave S Collector 33 96 18 370 63 59 60 62 Mod Good 30 7 61
1615 132nd St 35th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Collector 35 98 19 400 81 62 60 75 Mod V Good 11 8 74
1618 132nd St 35th Ln S 37th Ave S Local 22 132 16 339 70 47 60 62 Mod Good 18 12 62
1529 133rd St Military Rd S 30th Pl S Collector 25 449 62 1,310 44 53 60 47 Mod Marginal 32 20 46
1153 133rd St 30th Pl S 31st Ave S Collector 25 208 29 607 44 82 60 57 Mod Fair 35 21 56
1172 133rd St 31st Ave S 32nd Ave S Collector 25 303 42 884 42 64 60 49 Mod Marginal 39 20 49
1154 133rd St 32nd Ave S S 132nd St Collector 25 388 54 1,132 62 49 60 58 Mod Fair 28 10 57
1520 133rd St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local 22 309 38 793 45 30 60 40 Mod Poor 41 14 39
1642 133rd St 35th Ave S EAST END Local 22 262 32 672 52 46 60 50 Mod Marginal 32 16 49
1851 133rd St East Marginal Way S Macadam Rd S Minor Arterial 34 488 92 1,936 82 74 60 80 Mod V Good 14 4 79
1555 133rd St Macadam Rd S 44th Ave S Minor Arterial 34 334 63 1,325 93 79 60 88 Mod Excellent 4 4 88
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 2 of 17116
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1862 133rd St 44th Ave S S 134th Pl Minor Arterial 34 481 91 1,908 80 62 60 74 Mod V Good 14 5 74
1919 133rd St S 134th Pl SR 599 Ramp Minor Arterial 35 388 75 1,584 68 88 30 75 Weak V Good 25 7 74
1921 133rd St SR 599 Ramp SR 599 Minor Arterial 45 22 6 116 85 98 60 89 Mod Excellent 12 3 89
1926 133rd St SR 599 Interurban Ave S Minor Arterial 35 210 41 858 67 61 60 65 Mod Good 24 9 65
1858 133rd St 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Local 27 259 39 816 95 84 60 91 Mod Excellent 1 4 91
1829 134th Pl S 133rd St 47th Ave S Local 26 977 141 2,964 74 55 60 68 Mod Good 16 9 67
1638 134th Pl 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Local 26 215 31 652 81 62 60 74 Mod V Good 17 2 74
1703 135th St Military Rd S 32nd Ave S Local 26 835 121 2,533 57 50 60 55 Mod Fair 31 12 54
1702 135th St 32nd Ave S 34th Ave S Local 27 637 96 2,007 80 61 60 74 Mod V Good 14 6 73
1701 135th St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local 27 320 48 1,008 69 55 60 65 Mod Good 23 8 64
1214 135th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local 27 309 46 973 77 57 60 71 Mod V Good 15 7 70
1899 136th St 32nd Ave S 34th Ave S Local 27 670 101 2,111 72 50 60 65 Mod Good 22 6 65
1676 136th St WEST END 45th Pl S Local 28 410 64 1,339 94 82 60 90 Mod Excellent 4 3 89
1900 136th St Macadam Rd S 48th Pl S Local 28 302 47 987 74 52 60 66 Mod Good 20 6 66
2084 136th St WEST END 52nd Pl S Local 28 80 12 261 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 8 5 81
2083 136th St 52nd Pl S 52nd Ave S Local 28 284 44 928 87 68 60 80 Mod V Good 1 3 80
1898 137th Pl 43rd Pl S NORTH END Local 28 136 21 444 65 41 60 57 Mod Fair 27 8 57
1896 137th Pl S 137th Pl S 137th Pl Local 26 188 27 570 83 64 60 76 Mod V Good 12 5 76
1634 137th St 32nd Ave S 34th Ave S Local 26 767 111 2,327 78 63 60 73 Mod V Good 17 5 73
1830 137th St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local 26 206 30 625 76 56 60 70 Mod Good 18 6 69
1145 137th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local 26 300 43 910 70 60 60 67 Mod Good 22 8 66
1139 137th St 40th Ave S 43rd Pl S Local 26 150 22 455 63 38 60 55 Mod Fair 30 6 54
1171 137th St 43rd Pl S 43rd Pl S Local 25 285 40 831 69 52 60 64 Mod Good 24 7 63
1835 137th St 43rd Pl S 44th Ave S Local 25 420 58 1,225 85 67 60 79 Mod V Good 12 3 79
1850 137th St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Local 25 387 54 1,129 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 9 3 81
1173 137th St 45th Ave S 45th Pl S Local 25 248 34 723 86 67 60 79 Mod V Good 10 4 79
1849 137th St 45th Pl S Macadam Rd S Local 25 163 23 475 86 68 60 80 Mod V Good 6 8 80
1854 137th St 52nd Ave S 52nd Pl S Local 27 208 31 655 44 49 60 46 Mod Marginal 41 16 45
1847 137th St 52nd Pl S 53rd Ave S Local 27 127 19 400 52 38 60 48 Mod Marginal 37 10 47
1636 137th St 53rd Ave S 53rd Ave S Local 27 152 23 479 65 38 60 56 Mod Fair 19 16 56
1637 137th St 53rd Ave S 56th Ave S Local 27 224 34 706 39 34 60 37 Mod Poor 43 18 37
1958 138th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S Local 27 340 51 1,071 82 64 60 76 Mod V Good 12 6 76
1959 138th St Macadam Rd S NE END Local 27 268 40 844 56 45 60 53 Mod Fair 28 11 52
2085 138th St 51st Ave S 51st Ave S Local 27 114 17 359 84 65 60 77 Mod V Good 13 3 77
1121 139th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 41st Ave S Local 24 382 51 1,070 69 45 60 61 Mod Good 23 7 61
1124 139th St 41st Ave S 42nd Ave S Local 24 348 46 974 83 64 60 77 Mod V Good 12 5 76
1125 139th St 42nd Ave S 44th Ave S Local 24 620 83 1,736 64 48 60 59 Mod Fair 28 7 58
1126 139th St WEST END 45th Ave S Local 24 113 15 316 85 67 60 79 Mod V Good 10 5 79
1123 139th St 45th Ave S EAST END Local 24 295 39 826 77 57 60 70 Mod V Good 19 4 70
1128 139th St 51st Ave S 53rd Ave S Local 26 546 79 1,656 76 55 60 69 Mod Good 20 4 68
1127 139th St 53rd Ave S 55th Ave S Local 26 374 54 1,134 50 39 60 46 Mod Marginal 37 7 45
1122 139th St 56th Ave S 56th Pl S Local 26 183 26 555 50 24 80 41 Strng Marginal 29 21 41
1600 140th St Military Rd S 33rd Ave S Local 26 358 52 1,086 60 48 60 56 Mod Fair 29 11 55
1602 140th St 33rd Ave S 33rd Pl S Local 26 426 62 1,292 71 57 60 66 Mod Good 21 8 66
1485 140th St 33rd Pl S 35th Ave S Local 27 537 81 1,692 66 49 60 60 Mod Good 22 12 60
1483 140th St 35th Ave S 34th Ave S Local 27 59 9 186 58 49 60 55 Mod Fair 30 12 54
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 3 of 17117
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1601 140th St 34th Ave S 37th Ave S Local 27 369 55 1,162 33 39 60 35 Mod Poor 51 16 34
1604 140th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S Local 27 307 46 967 45 42 60 44 Mod Marginal 35 13 44
1484 140th St 38th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 27 336 50 1,058 47 32 60 42 Mod Marginal 41 12 41
1603 140th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S Local 26 646 93 1,960 78 59 60 72 Mod V Good 17 5 72
1486 140th St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Local 26 326 47 989 54 61 60 57 Mod Fair 36 10 56
1599 140th St 43rd Ave S 44th Ave S Local 26 329 48 998 74 60 60 69 Mod Good 22 5 69
1605 140th St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Local 26 364 53 1,104 67 49 60 61 Mod Good 29 4 60
1547 140th St 45th Ave S EAST END Local 26 568 82 1,723 91 75 60 86 Mod Excellent 8 0 86
1598 140th St 53rd Ave S 55th Ave S Local 24 540 72 1,512 79 59 60 72 Mod V Good 16 6 72
1482 140th St Interurban Ave S NE END Local 24 207 28 580 65 38 60 56 Mod Fair 24 10 56
1588 141st St 33rd Pl S 34th Pl S Local 24 178 24 498 86 67 60 80 Mod V Good 10 4 79
1589 141st St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 24 690 92 1,932 49 43 60 47 Mod Marginal 39 12 46
1587 141st St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S Local 24 589 79 1,649 53 41 60 49 Mod Marginal 31 15 49
1591 141st St 56th Ave S 56th Pl S Local 24 239 32 669 36 39 80 37 Strng Poor 37 18 37
1590 141st St 56th Pl S 57th Ave S Local 25 167 23 487 51 45 60 49 Mod Marginal 32 17 48
1089 142nd Pl Military Rd S EAST END Local 25 208 29 607 80 61 60 73 Mod V Good 14 7 73
1090 142nd Pl S 142nd Pl S 142nd Pl Local 25 146 20 426 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 4 9 81
1279 142nd Pl 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local 25 436 61 1,272 66 40 60 57 Mod Fair 26 8 57
1742 142nd St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 25 700 97 2,042 55 48 60 53 Mod Fair 33 12 52
1743 142nd St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Local 26 318 46 965 68 44 60 60 Mod Good 25 7 59
1739 142nd St WEST END 52nd Ave S Local 26 85 12 258 83 64 60 77 Mod V Good 6 11 76
1744 142nd St 52nd Ave S 53rd Ave S Local 26 272 39 825 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 15 6 72
1737 142nd St 57th Ave S 59th Ave S Local 26 426 62 1,292 57 31 60 49 Mod Marginal 31 12 48
1353 143rd Pl Interurban Ave S EAST END Local 26 839 121 2,545 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 10 3 81
1138 143rd St Interurban Ave S EAST END Local 26 1,107 160 3,358 60 50 60 57 Mod Fair 26 9 56
1677 144th St Military Rd S 34th Ave S Collector 30 319 53 1,117 61 60 60 61 Mod Good 30 9 60
2016 144th St 34th Ave S 34th Ln S Collector 30 289 48 1,012 74 80 30 76 Weak V Good 20 6 76
2015 144th St 34th Ln S 37th Ave S Collector 30 495 83 1,733 58 75 30 64 Weak Good 33 9 63
1187 144th St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Collector 30 540 90 1,890 59 61 60 60 Mod Fair 31 10 59
1678 144th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 41st Ave S Collector 30 392 65 1,372 69 44 60 61 Mod Good 24 7 60
1191 144th St 41st Ave S 42nd Ave S Collector 30 390 65 1,365 82 63 60 76 Mod V Good 14 4 76
2074 144th St 42nd Ave S 44th Ln S Collector 29 777 125 2,629 53 74 60 60 Mod Fair 35 11 59
2073 144th St 44th Ln S 46th Ave S Collector 29 545 88 1,844 47 64 60 53 Mod Fair 37 17 52
1194 144th St 46th Ave S 48th Ave S Collector 29 653 105 2,209 47 75 30 57 Weak Fair 41 12 56
1190 144th St 48th Ave S Macadam Rd S Collector 29 654 105 2,213 52 58 60 54 Mod Fair 37 10 54
2079 144th St Macadam Rd S I-5 Fwy Collector 29 187 30 633 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 16 5 73
2076 144th St I-5 Fwy 53rd Ave S Collector 29 254 41 859 58 54 60 56 Mod Fair 30 12 56
1189 144th St 53rd Ave S Macadam Rd S Collector 31 106 18 383 100 90 60 97 Mod Excellent 0 0 96
1245 144th St Macadam Rd S 54th Pl S Collector 31 343 59 1,241 59 59 60 59 Mod Fair 27 14 59
1244 144th St 54th Pl S 55th Ave S Collector 31 129 22 467 57 57 60 57 Mod Fair 27 16 56
1679 144th St 55th Ave S 56th Ave S Collector 31 421 73 1,523 61 53 60 58 Mod Fair 26 13 58
1192 144th St 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Collector 31 425 73 1,537 82 63 60 76 Mod V Good 9 8 75
1193 144th St 57th Ave S 58th Ave S Collector 31 427 74 1,544 54 34 60 47 Mod Marginal 30 15 46
1243 144th St 58th Ave S 59th Ave S Local 27 420 63 1,323 60 41 60 54 Mod Fair 29 11 53
1188 144th St 59th Ave S EAST END Local 27 218 33 687 63 38 60 55 Mod Fair 25 11 54
1246 144th St Interurban Ave S EAST END Local 27 651 98 2,051 63 35 60 54 Mod Fair 31 6 53
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 4 of 17118
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1509 145th St 48th Pl S EAST END Local 27 231 35 728 96 86 60 92 Mod Excellent 3 1 92
1367 145th St S 145th St DS@63E S 145th St Local 27 63 9 198 93 79 60 88 Mod Excellent 1 6 88
1361 145th St DS@63E S 145th St S 145th St Local 27 95 14 299 80 61 80 74 Strng V Good 0 20 73
1805 146th St Military Rd S 35th Ave S Local 25 435 60 1,269 75 56 60 69 Mod Good 20 5 68
1804 146th St 35th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 25 681 95 1,986 65 55 60 62 Mod Good 23 8 61
1942 146th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 41st Ave S Local 25 659 92 1,922 49 48 60 49 Mod Marginal 37 14 48
1801 146th St 41st Ave S 42nd Ave S Local 25 347 48 1,012 56 48 60 54 Mod Fair 27 13 53
1806 146th St 42nd Ave S 46th Ave S Local 25 1,318 183 3,844 74 71 30 73 Weak V Good 23 3 73
1803 146th St 46th Ave S 48th Pl S Local 25 793 110 2,313 54 56 60 55 Mod Fair 37 9 54
1802 146th St 48th Pl S EAST END Local 26 316 46 959 75 54 60 68 Mod Good 21 5 67
1758 147th St 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Local 26 377 54 1,144 91 73 60 85 Mod Excellent 5 4 85
1251 147th St 57th Ave S 58th Ave S Local 26 427 62 1,295 85 67 60 79 Mod V Good 13 2 79
1252 147th St 58th Ave S 59th Aly S Collector 35 205 40 837 83 65 60 77 Mod V Good 14 3 77
1756 147th St 59th Aly S 59th Ave S Collector 35 99 19 404 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 9 2 82
1759 147th St 59th Ave S 59th Ave S Collector 35 131 25 535 66 39 60 57 Mod Fair 23 11 56
1757 147th St Interurban Ave S EAST END Local 32 120 21 448 70 47 60 62 Mod Good 22 8 62
1578 148th St Military Rd S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 32 817 145 3,050 68 54 60 63 Mod Good 25 6 63
1272 148th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S Local 32 1,233 219 4,603 62 55 60 60 Mod Good 30 8 59
1273 148th St 42nd Ave S 46th Ave S Local 32 1,314 234 4,906 67 62 60 65 Mod Good 24 4 65
2071 148th St 46th Ave S 46th Ln S Local 32 255 45 952 67 60 60 65 Mod Good 23 10 64
2070 148th St 46th Ln S 46th Ln S Local 32 153 27 571 98 89 60 95 Mod Excellent 1 0 95
1271 148th St 46th Ln S EAST END Local 32 218 39 814 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 4 8 82
1335 149th St WEST END 57th Ave S Local 32 656 117 2,449 81 62 60 75 Mod V Good 14 5 74
1506 149th St 59th Ave S 62nd Ave S Local 32 674 120 2,516 79 60 60 72 Mod V Good 17 5 72
1345 149th St DS@480E NW END Interurban Ave S Local 32 537 95 2,005 51 46 60 49 Mod Marginal 35 10 49
1501 150th Pl WEST END 57th Ave S Local 32 767 136 2,863 83 65 60 77 Mod V Good 13 4 77
1369 150th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 38th Ave S Local 32 530 94 1,979 90 70 60 83 Mod V Good 10 0 83
1374 150th St 38th Ave S 41st Pl S Local 32 688 122 2,569 93 81 60 89 Mod Excellent 4 3 89
1376 150th St 41st Pl S 42nd Ave S Local 32 242 43 903 73 51 60 65 Mod Good 22 6 65
1350 150th St 42nd Ave S 43rd Pl S Local 32 527 94 1,967 69 50 60 63 Mod Good 22 9 62
1349 150th St 43rd Pl S 46th Ave S Local 32 788 140 2,942 73 59 60 69 Mod Good 21 5 68
1358 150th St 46th Ave S EAST END Local 32 898 160 3,353 56 35 60 49 Mod Marginal 31 13 94
1354 150th St Macadam Rd S EAST END Local 32 767 136 2,863 76 56 60 69 Mod Good 18 6 69
1662 151st Pl EAST END EAST END Local 32 183 33 683 58 29 60 48 Mod Marginal 28 14 47
1607 151st Pl WEST END 63rd Pl S Local 32 98 17 366 63 48 60 58 Mod Fair 26 11 57
1546 151st Pl 63rd Pl S EAST END Local 32 161 29 601 68 58 60 65 Mod Good 19 13 64
1606 151st Pl EAST END EAST END Local 32 182 32 679 81 62 60 74 Mod V Good 9 10 74
1544 151st St S 151st St DS@90E S 151st St Local 32 90 16 336 92 77 60 87 Mod Excellent 3 5 87
1299 151st St DS@90E S 151st St S 151st St Local 32 44 8 164 75 54 80 68 Strng Good 6 19 68
1543 151st St WEST END 42nd Ave S Local 32 220 39 821 78 58 60 71 Mod V Good 16 6 71
1542 151st St 51st Ave S 52nd Ave S Local 32 375 67 1,400 72 49 60 64 Mod Good 24 5 64
1298 151st St 62nd Ave S 63rd Pl S Collector 35 310 60 1,266 65 68 60 66 Mod Good 24 11 65
1300 151st St 63rd Pl S 65th Ave S Collector 35 332 65 1,356 68 65 60 67 Mod Good 18 14 66
1995 152nd Pl 57th Ave S EAST END Local 26 458 66 1,389 54 27 60 45 Mod Marginal 37 10 44
1718 152nd St International Blvd 37th Pl S Local 26 717 104 2,175 45 48 60 47 Mod Marginal 40 13 46
1719 152nd St 37th Pl S 40th Ave S Local 26 656 95 1,990 55 56 60 55 Mod Fair 38 7 55
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 5 of 17119
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1108 152nd St 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Local 25 315 44 919 44 29 60 39 Mod Poor 43 13 38
1720 152nd St WEST END 51st Ave S Local 25 271 38 790 72 50 60 65 Mod Good 22 6 64
1717 152nd St Macadam Rd S 57th Ave S Local 26 895 129 2,715 78 61 60 72 Mod V Good 19 3 72
1716 152nd St 57th Ave S EAST END Local 26 537 78 1,629 70 47 60 63 Mod Good 18 6 62
1584 153rd St 62nd Ave S 64th Ave S Local 26 590 85 1,790 77 57 60 70 Mod Good 11 13 69
1585 153rd St 64th Ave S 65th Ave S Local 26 410 59 1,244 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 3 9 81
1661 153rd St 65th Ave S EAST END Local 27 659 99 2,076 69 44 60 60 Mod Good 24 7 60
2023 156th St 44th Ave S 44th Pl S Local 27 407 61 1,282 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 9 3 81
2022 156th St 44th Pl S 47th Ave S Local 25 415 58 1,210 89 70 60 83 Mod V Good 8 4 82
1197 156th St I-405 Ramp Nelsen Pl Local 26 431 62 1,307 51 61 60 55 Mod Fair 33 16 54
1852 158th St S 160th St Military Rd S Local 27 135 20 425 65 45 60 59 Mod Fair 25 10 58
1526 158th St Military Rd S 38th Pl S Local 27 870 131 2,741 73 61 60 69 Mod Good 21 6 69
1649 158th St 38th Pl S 38th Pl S Local 28 38 6 124 98 89 60 95 Mod Excellent 0 2 95
1650 158th St 38th Pl S 39th Pl S Local 25 100 14 292 98 89 60 95 Mod Excellent 0 3 94
1522 158th St 39th Pl S 40th Pl S Local 25 277 38 808 68 55 60 64 Mod Good 21 11 94
1646 158th St 40th Pl S 40th Ln S Local 27 184 28 580 60 45 60 55 Mod Fair 23 17 94
1556 158th St 40th Ln S 42nd Ave S Local 26 350 51 1,062 51 44 60 49 Mod Marginal 35 14 94
1525 158th St 42nd Ave S 44th Ave S Local 25 740 103 2,158 93 80 60 89 Mod Excellent 4 3 88
1527 158th St 44th Ave S 47th Ave S Local 25 856 119 2,497 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 9 4 81
1807 159th St 51st Ave S 53rd Ave S Local 25 721 100 2,103 74 53 60 67 Mod Good 15 11 66
1907 160th St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Collector 29 348 56 1,177 63 49 60 58 Mod Fair 25 12 58
1476 160th St 43rd Ave S 46th Ave S Collector 29 1,029 166 3,481 63 57 60 61 Mod Good 25 12 60
1469 160th St 46th Ave S 47th Ave S Collector 29 302 49 1,022 61 45 60 56 Mod Fair 29 10 55
1908 160th St 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Collector 28 300 47 980 67 41 60 58 Mod Fair 23 10 58
1468 160th St 48th Ave S 51st Ave S Collector 28 689 107 2,251 63 45 60 57 Mod Fair 25 12 56
1909 160th St 51st Ave S Slade Way Collector 28 802 125 2,620 63 59 60 62 Mod Good 27 10 61
1545 161st St S 161st St DS@78W S 161st St Local 24 78 10 218 48 32 60 43 Mod Marginal 42 10 42
1797 161st St DS@78W S 161st St S 161st St Local 24 79 11 221 76 56 60 69 Mod Good 23 1 69
1798 161st St WEST END 51st Ave S Local 24 364 49 1,019 69 45 60 61 Mod Good 21 10 60
1220 162nd St 46th Ave S EAST END Local 24 125 17 350 60 28 60 50 Mod Marginal 26 13 49
1219 162nd St 48th Ave S EAST END Local 25 301 42 878 51 37 60 46 Mod Marginal 39 10 45
1264 163rd Pl 45th Ave S 45th Pl S Local 25 142 20 414 70 47 60 63 Mod Good 18 12 62
1262 163rd Pl 45th Pl S 46th Ave S Local 25 140 19 408 63 34 60 54 Mod Fair 28 9 53
1263 163rd Pl 51st Ave S EAST END Local 26 483 70 1,465 58 42 60 53 Mod Fair 24 12 52
1261 163rd Pl S 163rd Pl S 163rd Pl Local 26 139 20 422 57 45 60 53 Mod Fair 24 20 52
1490 164th St 42nd Ave S 47th Ave S Collector 31 1,551 267 5,609 53 62 60 56 Mod Fair 36 8 55
1404 164th St 47th Ave S 47th Pl S Collector 31 121 21 438 67 64 60 66 Mod Good 24 9 66
1489 164th St 47th Pl S 48th Pl S Collector 31 389 67 1,407 75 69 60 73 Mod V Good 21 4 72
1493 164th St 48th Pl S 49th Ave S Collector 32 202 36 754 56 67 30 60 Weak Fair 38 6 59
1491 164th St 49th Ave S 51st Ave S Collector 32 379 67 1,415 66 40 60 58 Mod Fair 26 7 57
1492 164th St 51st Ave S 52nd Ave S Local 25 545 76 1,590 59 42 60 53 Mod Fair 25 16 53
1989 164th St 52nd Ave S EAST END Local 25 277 38 808 59 58 60 59 Mod Fair 27 13 58
2155 166th St S 166th St 51st Ave S Collector 35 152 30 621 74 57 60 68 Mod Good 22 5 68
1215 166th St CITY LIMIT 53rd Ave S Local 25 190 26 554 66 53 60 62 Mod Good 25 9 61
1565 166th St 53rd Ave S 54th Ave S Local 26 270 39 819 55 49 60 53 Mod Fair 31 14 52
1910 168th St WEST END Southcenter Pkwy Local 27 276 41 869 69 45 60 61 Mod Good 20 11 60
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 6 of 17120
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1003 168th St Southcenter Pkwy DS@359E Southcenter Pkwy Local 25 359 50 1,047 70 46 60 62 Mod Good 21 10 61
1100 180th St Southcenter Pkwy Andover Park W Minor Arterial 45 1,434 359 7,529 67 66 60 67 Mod Good 24 9 66
1723 180th St Andover Park W Andover Park E Minor Arterial 45 918 230 4,820 51 62 60 55 Mod Fair 36 13 54
1223 180th St Andover Park E Sperry Dr Minor Arterial 45 881 220 4,625 47 64 30 52 Weak Fair 44 9 52
1222 180th St Sperry Dr West Valley Hwy Minor Arterial 45 528 132 2,772 41 56 30 46 Weak Marginal 50 9 45
1101 180th St West Valley Hwy S 180th St Principal Arterial 45 1,234 309 6,479 52 58 60 54 Mod Fair 39 6 54
1465 184th Pl 54th Pl S Southcenter Pkwy Minor Arterial 45 2,072 518 10,878 75 68 60 73 Mod V Good 18 6 73
1888 200th St Orillia Rd S 46th Ave S Principal Arterial 56 247 77 1,614 99 90 60 96 Mod Excellent 1 0 95
1097 200th St 46th Ave S Southcenter Pkwy Principal Arterial 56 1,315 409 8,591 100 90 60 97 Mod Excellent 0 0 96
1454 200th St Southcenter Pkwy CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial 56 1,439 448 9,401 37 71 60 48 Mod Marginal 38 25 48
1120 204th St Orillia Rd S Frager Rd Local 25 3,339 464 9,739 45 56 60 48 Mod Marginal 39 15 48
1957 27th Ave S S 102nd St SOUTH END Local 24 1,756 234 4,917 83 74 60 80 Mod V Good 13 4 79
1787 32nd Ave S S 130th St S 133rd St Local 19 763 81 1,691 49 51 60 50 Mod Fair 36 15 49
2013 32nd Ave S S 133rd St S 133rd Ln Local 19 306 32 678 86 67 60 80 Mod V Good 12 2 79
2011 32nd Ave S S 133rd Ln S 135th St Local 19 345 36 765 63 52 60 60 Mod Fair 28 8 59
1792 32nd Ave S S 135th St S 136th St Local 20 319 35 744 75 55 60 68 Mod Good 19 6 68
1786 32nd Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local 19 274 29 607 75 69 30 73 Weak V Good 22 2 73
1791 32nd Ave S S 137th St SOUTH END Local 20 135 15 315 94 82 60 90 Mod Excellent 0 6 89
1446 33rd Ave S S 130th St S 132nd St Local 19 755 80 1,674 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 17 4 72
1447 33rd Ave S S 140th St 34th Pl S Local 19 993 105 2,201 89 69 60 82 Mod V Good 8 3 82
1474 33rd Pl S S 140th St S 141st St Local 20 358 40 835 78 59 60 72 Mod V Good 18 4 71
1582 33rd Pl S NW END S 130th St Local 20 326 36 761 60 28 60 49 Mod Marginal 33 7 48
1463 33rd Pl S 33rd Pl S 33rd Pl S Local 19 130 14 288 65 38 60 56 Mod Fair 27 8 56
1207 34th Ave S S 126th St SOUTH END Local 24 628 84 1,758 75 54 60 68 Mod Good 16 6 67
1208 34th Ave S S 130th St S 132nd St Local 25 693 96 2,021 75 54 60 68 Mod Good 17 8 67
1211 34th Ave S S 132nd St S 133rd St Local 25 285 40 831 77 76 30 77 Weak V Good 19 4 77
1206 34th Ave S S 133rd St S 135th St Local 30 664 111 2,324 73 55 60 67 Mod Good 20 7 66
1210 34th Ave S S 135th St S 136th St Local 28 327 51 1,068 75 65 60 72 Mod V Good 20 5 72
1203 34th Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local 28 286 44 934 82 64 60 76 Mod V Good 15 4 75
1212 34th Ave S S 137th St S 140th St Local 28 1,067 166 3,486 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 16 5 72
1204 34th Ave S 33rd Ave S S 144th St Local 29 511 82 1,729 89 70 60 82 Mod V Good 11 0 82
1205 34th Ave S S 144th St Military Rd S Local 22 582 71 1,494 85 67 60 79 Mod V Good 11 4 79
1209 34th Pl S S 141st St 33rd Ave S Local 25 478 66 1,394 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 7 5 81
1732 35th Ave S S 124th St S 126th St Local 21 869 101 2,129 65 43 60 58 Mod Fair 22 13 57
1733 35th Ave S S 126th St S 128th St Local 22 423 52 1,086 54 46 60 52 Mod Fair 29 13 51
1099 35th Ave S S 128th St S 130th St Local 21 636 74 1,558 52 33 60 46 Mod Marginal 34 11 45
2004 35th Ave S S 130th St Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 22 310 38 796 58 29 60 48 Mod Marginal 31 10 48
1730 35th Ave S S 132nd St S 133rd St Local 32 441 78 1,646 78 58 60 71 Mod V Good 13 9 71
1236 35th Ave S S 133rd St S 135th St Local 32 663 118 2,475 57 52 60 55 Mod Fair 28 15 54
1234 35th Ave S S 135th St S 137th St Local 28 592 92 1,934 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 17 3 73
1235 35th Ave S S 140th St S 142nd Pl Local 29 833 134 2,818 57 46 60 53 Mod Fair 32 11 53
1233 35th Ave S S 146th St SOUTH END Local 30 294 49 1,029 71 47 60 63 Mod Good 21 8 62
1741 35th Ln S S 130th St S 132nd St Local 19 483 51 1,071 51 36 60 46 Mod Marginal 31 15 45
1107 37th Ave S S 126th St S 128th St Local 19 434 46 962 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 11 5 77
1064 37th Ave S S 128th St S 130th St Local 22 621 76 1,594 47 41 60 45 Mod Marginal 37 16 44
1065 37th Ave S S 130th St S 132nd St Local 30 418 70 1,463 55 69 60 60 Mod Good 34 10 59
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 7 of 17121
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1072 37th Ave S S 132nd St SOUTH END Local 30 347 58 1,215 83 64 60 76 Mod V Good 13 4 76
2008 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd S 135th St Local 25 652 91 1,902 53 44 60 50 Mod Marginal 36 11 49
1071 37th Ave S S 135th St S 137th St Local 32 590 105 2,203 61 67 30 63 Weak Good 32 7 63
1066 37th Ave S S 137th St S 138th St Local 32 321 57 1,198 60 56 60 59 Mod Fair 31 8 58
1068 37th Ave S S 138th St S 140th St Local 32 721 128 2,692 62 71 60 65 Mod Good 29 8 65
1067 37th Ave S S 140th St S 141st St Local 32 230 41 859 41 47 60 43 Mod Marginal 44 15 43
1063 37th Ave S S 141st St S 142nd St Local 24 461 61 1,291 42 65 60 50 Mod Fair 43 14 49
1069 37th Ave S S 142nd St S 142nd Pl Local 26 156 23 473 56 80 30 64 Weak Good 32 12 63
1070 37th Ave S S 142nd Pl S 144th St Local 26 502 73 1,523 51 64 60 56 Mod Fair 37 12 55
1308 38th Ave S S 130th St SOUTH END Local 22 603 74 1,548 72 56 60 67 Mod Good 18 10 66
1309 38th Ave S S 138th St S 140th St Local 30 632 105 2,212 70 58 60 66 Mod Good 26 4 65
2094 38th Ln S S 130th St SOUTH END Local 24 169 23 473 78 59 60 72 Mod V Good 13 9 71
1006 38th Ln S 38th Ln S 38th Ln S Local 19 162 17 359 98 89 60 95 Mod Excellent 0 2 95
1918 38th Pl S NORTH END S 132nd Pl Local 20 163 18 380 51 39 60 47 Mod Marginal 38 11 46
1970 39th Ave S S 116th St S 117th St Local 22 294 36 755 68 62 60 66 Mod Good 27 4 66
1842 40th Ave S S 114th St S 115th St Local 19 310 33 687 48 26 60 41 Mod Marginal 36 16 40
1169 40th Ave S NORTH END S 116th Pl Local 20 243 27 567 95 84 60 91 Mod Excellent 3 3 91
1831 40th Ave S S 116th Pl S 117th St Local 24 202 27 566 95 84 60 91 Mod Excellent 3 2 91
1156 40th Ave S S 117th St S 117th Pl Local 25 181 25 528 96 87 60 93 Mod Excellent 1 3 93
1855 40th Ave S S 117th Pl Interurban Pl S Local 24 480 64 1,344 97 88 60 94 Mod Excellent 0 3 93
1861 40th Ave S Interurban Pl S Interurban Ave S Local 25 109 15 318 75 55 60 68 Mod Good 22 3 68
1143 40th Ave S S 126th St S 128th St Local 25 317 44 925 66 39 60 57 Mod Fair 22 12 56
1825 40th Ave S East Marginal Way S S 132nd Pl Collector 26 881 127 2,672 51 59 60 54 Mod Fair 34 15 53
2096 40th Ave S S 132nd Pl 42nd Ave S Collector 27 1,544 232 4,864 61 73 60 65 Mod Good 29 10 65
1379 40th Ave S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Local 24 632 84 1,770 54 31 80 46 Strng Marginal 28 13 45
1256 40th Ave S Southcenter Blvd S 154th Ln Local 25 142 20 414 76 55 60 69 Mod Good 18 7 68
1254 40th Ave S S 154th Ln DS@337S S 154th Ln Local 25 337 47 983 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 11 2 81
1953 40th Pl S NORTH END S 119th St Local 25 262 36 764 77 57 60 70 Mod V Good 12 6 70
1178 41st Ave S S 113th St S 114th St Local 26 240 35 728 78 59 60 72 Mod V Good 14 8 72
1180 41st Ave S S 130th St S 131st Pl Local 25 421 58 1,228 76 55 60 69 Mod Good 20 4 68
1181 41st Ave S NORTH END S 139th St Local 24 588 78 1,646 85 66 60 78 Mod V Good 11 4 78
1517 42nd Ave S S 115th St S 116th St Collector 34 152 29 603 59 55 60 58 Mod Fair 30 11 57
1521 42nd Ave S S 116th St Pedestrian Bridge S 119th St Access Collector 35 1,145 223 4,675 73 78 30 75 Weak V Good 23 4 74
1557 42nd Ave S Pedestrian Bridge S 119th St Access S 122nd St Collector 25 987 137 2,879 81 83 60 82 Mod V Good 15 4 81
1195 42nd Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Collector 25 713 99 2,080 74 72 60 73 Mod V Good 22 4 73
1647 42nd Ave S S 124th St Macadam Rd S Collector 28 1,063 165 3,472 63 56 60 61 Mod Good 29 8 60
1179 42nd Ave S S 126th St SE END Local 25 164 23 478 91 73 60 85 Mod V Good 7 2 84
1516 42nd Ave S 40th Ave S S 139th St Collector 25 794 110 2,316 59 71 60 63 Mod Good 30 11 63
1196 42nd Ave S S 139th St S 140th St Collector 26 281 41 852 89 70 60 83 Mod V Good 8 3 83
1519 42nd Ave S S 140th St S 140th St Collector 28 38 6 124 94 82 60 90 Mod Excellent 0 6 90
1388 42nd Ave S S 140th St S 141st St Collector 30 318 53 1,113 78 61 60 72 Mod V Good 18 4 72
1530 42nd Ave S S 141st St S 142nd St Collector 30 362 60 1,267 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 13 3 78
1663 42nd Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Collector 31 646 111 2,336 73 64 60 70 Mod V Good 21 6 70
1515 42nd Ave S S 144th St S 146th St Collector 31 666 115 2,409 55 67 60 59 Mod Fair 32 13 59
1163 42nd Ave S S 146th St S 148th St Collector 32 661 118 2,468 55 73 60 61 Mod Good 31 14 61
1389 42nd Ave S S 148th St S 150th St Collector 28 661 103 2,159 55 74 30 62 Weak Good 34 11 61
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 8 of 17122
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1523 42nd Ave S S 150th St S 151st St Collector 29 305 49 1,032 59 65 60 61 Mod Good 30 11 60
1859 42nd Ave S S 151st St S 152nd St Collector 28 362 56 1,183 54 75 60 61 Mod Good 32 14 60
1860 42nd Ave S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Collector 29 349 56 1,181 52 57 60 53 Mod Fair 34 15 53
1648 42nd Ave S Southcenter Blvd S 158th St Collector 28 1,648 256 5,383 75 69 60 73 Mod V Good 16 5 73
1639 42nd Ave S S 158th St S 160th St Collector 29 654 105 2,213 87 68 60 81 Mod V Good 9 4 81
1964 43rd Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local 25 713 99 2,080 73 56 60 67 Mod Good 23 4 67
1962 43rd Ave S Macadam Rd S SOUTH END Local 26 814 118 2,469 50 46 60 49 Mod Marginal 37 13 48
1963 43rd Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St Local 27 671 101 2,114 73 51 60 65 Mod Good 20 7 65
1961 43rd Ave S NORTH END S 160th St Local 29 352 57 1,191 80 61 60 74 Mod V Good 10 10 73
1748 43rd Pl S S 116th St 44th Ave S Local 30 340 57 1,190 86 67 60 80 Mod V Good 12 2 79
1972 43rd Pl S S 137th St S 137th Pl Local 23 375 48 1,006 72 50 60 65 Mod Good 22 6 64
1796 44th Ave S 43rd Pl S S 118th St Local 19 535 56 1,186 68 77 30 71 Weak V Good 25 7 70
1793 44th Ave S S 118th St S 122nd St Local 20 1,407 156 3,283 71 70 30 71 Weak V Good 24 5 71
1789 44th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local 23 710 91 1,905 84 66 60 78 Mod V Good 12 4 78
1795 44th Ave S S 131st Pl S 133rd St Local 23 293 37 786 75 54 60 68 Mod Good 17 8 67
1788 44th Ave S S 137th St S 139th St Local 19 641 68 1,421 64 42 60 56 Mod Fair 26 10 56
1790 44th Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St Local 19 650 69 1,441 53 45 60 50 Mod Fair 37 11 50
2021 44th Ave S S 156th St S 158th St Local 19 475 50 1,053 94 84 60 91 Mod Excellent 3 3 90
1260 44th Pl S S 118th St 46th Ave S Local 19 705 74 1,563 92 76 60 86 Mod Excellent 7 1 86
1266 44th Pl S 46th Ave S S 122nd St Local 19 1,145 121 2,538 86 67 60 80 Mod V Good 13 1 79
1897 45th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local 26 711 103 2,157 77 57 60 70 Mod V Good 17 2 70
1399 45th Ave S S 137th St S 139th St Local 26 766 111 2,324 70 47 60 62 Mod Good 25 5 62
1247 45th Ave S S 139th St S 140th St Local 23 209 27 561 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 16 5 72
1913 45th Ave S NORTH END S 163rd Pl Local 23 434 55 1,165 62 40 60 55 Mod Fair 30 9 54
1230 45th Pl S S 136th St S 137th St Local 24 277 37 776 94 82 60 90 Mod Excellent 1 5 90
1232 45th Pl S S 163rd Pl SOUTH END Local 25 150 21 438 64 49 60 59 Mod Fair 19 16 59
1217 45th Pl S 45th Pl S DS@65S 45th Pl S Local 26 65 9 197 95 84 60 91 Mod Excellent 0 5 91
1231 45th Pl S DS@65S 45th Pl S 45th Pl S Local 25 60 8 175 88 69 60 82 Mod V Good 4 7 82
1275 46th Ave S 44th Pl S S 122nd St Local 21 870 102 2,132 94 83 60 90 Mod Excellent 4 2 90
1783 46th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local 23 712 91 1,911 75 55 60 69 Mod Good 20 5 68
1274 46th Ave S S 124th St S 125th St Local 24 176 23 493 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 10 2 81
1781 46th Ave S S 144th St S 146th St Local 20 666 74 1,554 55 51 60 54 Mod Fair 33 12 53
1782 46th Ave S S 146th St S 148th St Local 20 659 73 1,538 49 49 60 49 Mod Marginal 35 16 48
1277 46th Ave S S 148th St SOUTH END Local 19 220 23 488 58 30 60 48 Mod Marginal 36 6 48
1276 46th Ave S NORTH END S 150th St Local 19 304 32 674 85 66 60 79 Mod V Good 9 6 78
1836 46th Ave S S 160th St S 162nd St Local 21 603 70 1,477 60 45 60 55 Mod Fair 29 11 54
1914 46th Ave S S 163rd Pl S 162nd St Local 25 132 18 385 72 50 60 65 Mod Good 18 9 65
1828 47th Ave S CITY LIMIT S 104th Pl Local 21 229 27 561 52 51 60 52 Mod Fair 35 13 51
1385 47th Ave S S 104th Pl S 107th St Local 22 744 91 1,910 43 52 60 46 Mod Marginal 40 17 45
1832 47th Ave S S Ryan Way S 109th St Local 22 642 78 1,648 73 51 60 66 Mod Good 21 7 65
1856 47th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local 21 713 83 1,747 81 62 60 75 Mod V Good 16 3 74
1383 47th Ave S NE END S 134th Pl Local 25 292 41 852 54 25 60 45 Mod Marginal 32 14 44
1142 47th Ave S S 156th St S 158th St Local 26 510 74 1,547 91 74 60 85 Mod Excellent 6 3 85
1840 47th Ave S S 158th St SOUTH END Local 24 579 77 1,621 96 86 60 92 Mod Excellent 1 3 92
1846 47th Ave S S 160th St S 162nd St Local 25 608 84 1,773 66 39 60 57 Mod Fair 23 11 57
1451 48th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local 19 714 75 1,583 89 70 60 83 Mod V Good 8 3 82
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 9 of 17123
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1110 48th Ave S NE END Interurban Ave S Local 25 2,049 285 5,976 84 68 60 78 Mod V Good 12 5 78
1109 48th Ave S NE END S 134th Pl Local 23 118 15 317 96 86 60 92 Mod Excellent 1 3 92
1111 48th Ave S S 134th Pl 48th Pl S Local 19 222 23 492 87 68 60 81 Mod V Good 8 5 80
1449 48th Ave S 48th Pl S Macadam Rd S Local 19 437 46 969 76 56 60 70 Mod Good 18 5 69
1452 48th Ave S S 160th St S 162nd St Local 19 601 63 1,332 57 39 60 51 Mod Fair 30 13 50
1448 48th Ave S S 162nd St SOUTH END Local 19 165 17 366 51 42 60 48 Mod Marginal 38 11 48
1051 48th Pl S 48th Ave S S 136th St Local 19 291 31 645 78 59 60 72 Mod V Good 19 3 71
1048 48th Pl S S 146th St S 145th St Local 19 240 25 532 98 89 60 95 Mod Excellent 0 2 94
1047 48th Pl S S 145th St NW END Local 24 191 25 535 69 45 60 61 Mod Good 26 5 61
1049 48th Pl S DS@85N 48th Pl S 48th Pl S Local 24 89 12 249 59 33 60 50 Mod Fair 28 13 49
1050 48th Pl S 48th Pl S DS@85N 48th Pl S Local 25 85 12 248 97 88 60 94 Mod Excellent 0 3 93
1699 49th Ave S S 107th St S 114th St Local 25 2,254 313 6,574 88 70 60 82 Mod V Good 9 3 82
1667 49th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local 26 714 103 2,166 86 67 60 80 Mod V Good 10 4 80
1666 49th Ave S NORTH END S 164th St Local 27 405 61 1,276 57 30 60 48 Mod Marginal 30 14 47
1808 50th Ave S NORTH END S 112th St Local 19 273 29 605 74 54 60 68 Mod Good 21 5 67
1809 50th Ave S 51st Pl S S 122nd Ln Local 20 499 55 1,164 86 67 60 79 Mod V Good 12 3 79
1386 50th Pl S S 124th St S 125th St Collector 35 257 50 1,049 49 53 60 50 Mod Fair 31 20 49
1146 50th Pl S S 125th St S 130th Pl Collector 35 977 190 3,989 45 71 60 54 Mod Fair 40 15 53
1950 51st Ave S NORTH END S 138th St Local 22 722 88 1,853 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 11 5 77
1199 51st Ave S S 138th St S 139th St Local 20 338 38 789 52 35 60 46 Mod Marginal 35 13 46
1200 51st Ave S S 139th St SOUTH END Local 21 487 57 1,193 73 53 60 66 Mod Good 20 7 66
1044 51st Ave S S 144th St S 151st St Collector 35 2,319 451 9,469 48 63 60 53 Mod Fair 40 11 52
1951 51st Ave S S 151st St S 152nd St Collector 35 329 64 1,343 57 64 60 59 Mod Fair 32 11 59
1952 51st Ave S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Collector 34 569 107 2,257 63 78 30 68 Weak Good 28 9 68
1653 51st Ave S Southcenter Blvd SR 518 Ramp Minor Arterial 30 291 49 1,019 52 66 60 56 Mod Fair 28 20 56
2058 51st Ave S SR 518 Ramp I-5 Ramp Minor Arterial 30 279 47 977 47 67 60 54 Mod Fair 38 15 53
2051 51st Ave S SR 518 SR 518 Ramp Minor Arterial 30 192 32 672 62 57 60 60 Mod Good 26 12 60
1046 51st Ave S NORTH END S 159th St Local 25 424 59 1,237 57 33 60 49 Mod Marginal 28 15 49
1045 51st Ave S S 160th St S 161st St Collector 35 284 55 1,160 61 46 60 56 Mod Fair 29 10 56
1949 51st Ave S S 161st St S 163rd Pl Collector 35 702 137 2,867 69 83 30 74 Weak V Good 22 9 73
1201 51st Ave S S 163rd Pl S 164th St Collector 35 200 39 817 65 66 60 66 Mod Good 23 12 65
1202 51st Ave S S 164th St S 166th St Collector 35 621 121 2,536 70 75 60 72 Mod V Good 23 7 71
1700 51st Pl S S 122nd St 50th Ave S Local 20 199 22 464 99 90 60 96 Mod Excellent 0 1 95
1670 51st Pl S 50th Ave S S 122nd Ln Local 20 586 65 1,367 82 63 60 76 Mod V Good 15 4 75
2099 51st Pl S S 122nd Ln S 124th St Local 20 128 14 299 80 61 60 74 Mod V Good 18 2 73
1060 51st Pl S S 124th St SE END Local 20 815 91 1,902 72 54 60 66 Mod Good 24 4 65
1326 52nd Ave S Interurban Ave S 53rd Ave S Local 20 288 32 672 86 68 60 80 Mod V Good 8 5 80
1324 52nd Ave S 53rd Ave S S 136th St Local 22 268 33 688 63 56 60 60 Mod Good 23 15 60
1331 52nd Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local 22 294 36 755 54 53 60 54 Mod Fair 33 13 53
1328 52nd Ave S S 137th St S 138th St Local 22 261 32 670 25 34 60 28 Mod Poor 55 19 28
1325 52nd Ave S NORTH END S 142nd St Local 22 269 33 690 75 54 60 68 Mod Good 14 11 68
1330 52nd Ave S S 142nd St SOUTH END Local 22 333 41 855 89 70 60 83 Mod V Good 10 1 82
1327 52nd Ave S S 151st St Southcenter Blvd Local 21 914 107 2,239 81 62 60 75 Mod V Good 15 4 74
1329 52nd Ave S NORTH END S 164th St Local 21 173 20 424 78 58 60 71 Mod V Good 14 8 71
1594 52nd Pl S 52nd Ave S S 137th St Local 21 261 30 639 55 51 60 54 Mod Fair 32 13 53
1115 53rd Ave S 52nd Ave S S 136th St Local 21 274 32 671 74 53 60 67 Mod Good 15 11 67
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 10 of 17124
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1889 53rd Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local 21 213 25 522 63 33 60 53 Mod Fair 25 12 52
1117 53rd Ave S S 137th St S 139th St Collector 35 484 94 1,976 100 90 60 97 Mod Excellent 0 0 96
1890 53rd Ave S S 139th St S 140th St Collector 35 303 59 1,237 100 90 60 97 Mod Excellent 0 0 96
1174 53rd Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St Collector 34 621 117 2,463 99 90 60 96 Mod Excellent 1 0 95
1891 53rd Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Collector 33 787 144 3,030 83 64 60 77 Mod V Good 11 6 76
2163 53rd Ave S Southcenter Blvd DS@355S Southcenter Blvd Local 22 355 43 911 74 52 60 66 Mod Good 17 9 66
1112 53rd Ave S Klickitat Dr S 159th St Collector 27 519 78 1,635 64 59 60 62 Mod Good 25 11 62
1114 53rd Ave S S 159th St S 160th St Collector 28 552 86 1,803 67 57 60 64 Mod Good 21 12 63
1116 53rd Ave S S 166th St S 170th St Local 22 1,112 136 2,854 62 58 60 61 Mod Good 29 9 60
1113 53rd Ave S S 170th St S 172nd Ln Local 22 863 105 2,215 70 57 60 66 Mod Good 21 9 65
1736 53rd Pl S Slade Way 53rd Pl S SPUR Local 22 410 50 1,052 66 53 60 62 Mod Good 23 10 61
1684 53rd Pl S 53rd Pl S SPUR 53rd Pl S SPUR Local 36 48 10 202 51 61 60 54 Mod Fair 31 18 54
1683 53rd Pl S 53rd Pl S SPUR SW END Local 21 168 20 412 77 58 60 71 Mod V Good 18 5 70
1250 53rd Pl S 53rd Pl S 53rd Pl S Local 21 151 18 370 71 48 60 63 Mod Good 20 9 63
1971 53rd Pl S SPUR 53rd Pl S 53rd Pl S Local 21 176 21 431 63 42 60 56 Mod Fair 25 11 56
1487 54th Ave S Slade Way S 166th St Local 22 965 118 2,477 48 47 60 47 Mod Marginal 36 16 94
1475 55th Ave S S 140th St S 144th St Local 20 1,418 158 3,309 48 45 60 47 Mod Marginal 34 18 46
1407 56th Ave S S 130th Pl S 133rd St Local 20 784 87 1,829 83 64 60 77 Mod V Good 11 6 76
1409 56th Ave S S 133rd St Interurban Ave S Local 20 1,195 133 2,788 71 55 60 65 Mod Good 22 8 65
1408 56th Ave S S 137th St 56th Pl S Local 20 761 85 1,776 52 61 60 55 Mod Fair 35 13 54
1411 56th Ave S S 139th St S 141st St Local 20 712 79 1,661 56 43 60 52 Mod Fair 28 16 51
1410 56th Ave S S 141st St S 144th St Local 21 1,048 122 2,568 62 51 60 59 Mod Fair 27 10 58
1406 56th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Local 21 1,016 119 2,489 73 62 60 69 Mod Good 18 9 69
1992 56th Pl S 56th Ave S S 141st St Local 21 768 90 1,882 64 52 60 61 Mod Good 26 10 60
1569 57th Ave S S 130th Pl Pamela Dr Local 21 378 44 926 91 72 60 84 Mod V Good 7 2 84
1570 57th Ave S Pamela Dr S 133rd St Local 21 335 39 821 81 62 60 75 Mod V Good 15 4 74
2162 57th Ave S SW END Interurban Ave S Local 22 199 24 511 60 27 60 49 Mod Marginal 31 9 48
1568 57th Ave S S 141st St S 142nd St Local 22 319 39 819 53 52 60 53 Mod Fair 35 12 52
1402 57th Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Local 22 668 82 1,715 62 51 60 58 Mod Fair 28 11 57
1403 57th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Local 23 975 125 2,616 37 47 60 40 Mod Marginal 40 16 40
1572 57th Ave S S 147th St S 149th St Local 23 518 66 1,390 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 9 4 81
1567 57th Ave S S 149th St S 150th Pl Local 23 533 68 1,430 82 63 60 76 Mod V Good 14 4 75
1566 57th Ave S S 150th Pl SOUTH END Local 23 232 30 623 63 44 60 57 Mod Fair 28 9 56
1571 57th Ave S S 152nd St S 152nd Pl Local 23 320 41 859 51 33 60 45 Mod Marginal 33 17 44
1226 58th Ave S Interurban Ave S 59th Ave S Collector 35 577 112 2,356 66 43 60 58 Mod Fair 24 10 57
1227 58th Ave S 59th Ave S S 144th St Collector 35 668 130 2,728 56 64 60 59 Mod Fair 31 11 58
1224 58th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Collector 35 975 190 3,981 64 68 60 66 Mod Good 25 11 65
1225 58th Ave S S 147th St SOUTH END Local 20 1,113 124 2,597 87 68 60 80 Mod V Good 11 2 80
1362 59th Aly S S 147th St SOUTH END Local 19 643 68 1,425 64 36 60 55 Mod Fair 29 7 54
1738 59th Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Local 20 928 103 2,165 63 48 60 58 Mod Fair 27 10 57
1644 59th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Local 21 997 116 2,443 62 39 60 54 Mod Fair 26 12 53
1824 59th Ave S S 147th St S 149th St Local 22 611 75 1,568 73 57 60 68 Mod Good 20 7 67
1969 61st Ave S Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Pkwy Minor Arterial 40 587 130 2,739 45 59 30 50 Weak Marginal 46 10 49
1095 62nd Ave S 59th Ave S S 149th St Collector 33 816 150 3,142 59 71 60 63 Mod Good 25 16 62
1093 62nd Ave S S 149th St S 149th Pl Collector 35 278 54 1,135 67 67 60 68 Mod Good 21 11 67
1094 62nd Ave S S 149th Pl S 151st St Collector 34 416 79 1,650 68 69 60 68 Mod Good 22 11 68
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 11 of 17125
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1004 62nd Ave S S 151st St DS@131S S 151st St Local 20 131 15 306 25 24 60 25 Mod V Poor 51 23 24
1096 62nd Ave S S 153rd St Sunwood Blvd Local 20 158 18 369 83 64 60 76 Mod V Good 7 11 76
1091 62nd Ave S Sunwood Blvd Southcenter Blvd Local 20 750 83 1,750 68 49 60 61 Mod Good 21 11 61
1558 63rd Pl S S 151st St S 151st Pl Local 22 174 21 447 74 52 60 67 Mod Good 16 10 66
1216 64th Ave S S 153rd St SOUTH END Local 22 321 39 824 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 10 6 77
1041 65th Ave S S 151st St S 153rd St Collector 35 916 178 3,740 78 74 60 77 Mod V Good 13 9 76
1198 65th Ave S S 153rd St S 153rd St Collector 34 128 24 508 80 71 60 77 Mod V Good 12 8 77
1040 65th Ave S S 153rd St Southcenter Blvd Collector 35 951 185 3,883 57 56 60 57 Mod Fair 32 11 56
1955 66th Ave S Southcenter Blvd I-405 Ramp Minor Arterial 35 246 48 1,005 66 40 60 58 Mod Fair 24 10 57
1640 Airport Way S Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Minor Arterial 32 625 111 2,333 42 68 60 51 Mod Fair 38 20 50
1514 Airport Way S CITY LIMIT Boeing Access Rd Minor Arterial 30 1,068 178 3,738 46 69 60 54 Mod Fair 37 17 53
1709 Andover Park E Tukwila Pkwy Evans Black Dr Minor Arterial 30 782 130 2,737 78 59 60 71 Mod V Good 18 4 71
1712 Andover Park E Evans Black Dr Baker Blvd Minor Arterial 30 465 78 1,628 88 76 60 84 Mod V Good 10 2 84
1708 Andover Park E Baker Blvd Strander Blvd Minor Arterial 30 876 146 3,066 74 64 60 71 Mod V Good 19 6 70
1710 Andover Park E Strander Blvd Treck Dr Minor Arterial 30 715 119 2,503 72 60 60 68 Mod Good 18 7 67
1711 Andover Park E Treck Dr Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial 32 1,934 344 7,220 64 77 60 69 Mod Good 25 11 68
1714 Andover Park E Minkler Blvd Costco Dr Minor Arterial 32 1,473 262 5,499 63 80 60 69 Mod Good 24 12 69
1713 Andover Park E Costco Dr S 180th St Minor Arterial 32 1,022 182 3,815 70 66 60 69 Mod Good 18 12 68
2062 Andover Park W Tukwila Pkwy Southcenter Mall Minor Arterial 32 327 58 1,221 66 61 60 65 Mod Good 26 8 64
1984 Andover Park W Southcenter Mall Baker Blvd Minor Arterial 32 843 150 3,147 63 71 60 66 Mod Good 27 10 65
1902 Andover Park W Baker Blvd Strander Blvd Minor Arterial 32 871 155 3,252 83 64 60 77 Mod V Good 6 11 76
1901 Andover Park W Strander Blvd Corporate Dr N Minor Arterial 33 1,852 340 7,130 61 62 60 62 Mod Good 28 11 61
1240 Andover Park W Corporate Dr N Corporate Dr S Minor Arterial 33 518 95 1,994 61 63 60 62 Mod Good 20 12 61
1983 Andover Park W Corporate Dr S Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial 33 235 43 905 61 48 60 57 Mod Fair 25 14 56
1979 Andover Park W Minkler Blvd Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial 33 51 9 196 65 41 60 57 Mod Fair 20 15 56
1980 Andover Park W Minkler Blvd Upland Dr Minor Arterial 33 421 77 1,621 64 58 60 62 Mod Good 25 11 61
1237 Andover Park W Upland Dr Midland Dr Collector 35 756 147 3,087 61 73 60 65 Mod Good 23 16 65
1982 Andover Park W Midland Dr Triland Dr Minor Arterial 30 845 141 2,958 80 79 30 79 Weak V Good 16 4 79
1238 Andover Park W Triland Dr S 180th St Minor Arterial 30 620 103 2,170 66 64 60 66 Mod Good 23 11 65
1694 B Line Southcenter Pkwy C Line Local 20 271 30 632 63 40 60 55 Mod Fair 32 5 54
1042 Baker Blvd Andover Park W Andover Park E Local 20 1,080 120 2,520 42 66 60 50 Mod Marginal 41 17 49
1102 Baker Blvd Andover Park E Christensen Rd Local 20 343 38 800 47 45 60 47 Mod Marginal 41 12 46
1632 Beacon Ave S S Ryan Way S 107th St Local 22 943 115 2,420 57 52 60 55 Mod Fair 32 10 54
1838 Beacon Ave S S 107th St S 109th St Local 22 711 87 1,825 100 90 60 97 Mod Excellent 0 0 96
1751 Boeing Access Rd East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Principal Arterial 44 592 145 3,039 67 64 60 66 Mod Good 25 8 65
1752 Boeing Access Rd East Marginal Way S DS@220E East Marginal Way S Principal Arterial 44 220 54 1,129 32 56 30 40 Weak Poor 58 10 39
1753 Boeing Access Rd DS@220E East Marginal Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial 44 113 28 580 44 60 60 49 Mod Marginal 38 18 49
1977 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial 44 330 81 1,694 38 71 60 49 Mod Marginal 42 20 48
1976 Boeing Access Rd East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S Principal Arterial 44 176 43 903 82 63 60 76 Mod V Good 14 4 75
1749 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial 44 224 55 1,150 48 73 60 57 Mod Fair 36 16 56
1978 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial 44 377 92 1,935 45 75 30 55 Weak Fair 40 14 54
1754 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp Airport Way S Principal Arterial 44 168 41 862 57 59 60 58 Mod Fair 27 15 57
1750 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp I-5 Ramp Principal Arterial 44 371 91 1,904 42 65 60 50 Mod Fair 40 17 49
1755 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp Martin L King Jr Ramp Principal Arterial 42 395 92 1,936 40 76 60 52 Mod Fair 36 24 52
1975 Boeing Access Rd Martin L King Jr Ramp Martin L King Jr Way S Principal Arterial 44 292 71 1,499 33 43 60 36 Mod Poor 45 18 35
1772 C Line UnNamed-01534 Southcenter Pkwy Local 20 730 81 1,703 63 59 60 62 Mod Good 26 11 61
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 12 of 17126
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1698 Cascade Ave S Riverside Dr Todd Blvd Local 20 864 96 2,016 66 60 60 64 Mod Good 21 12 64
1697 Cascade Ave S Todd Blvd S Glacier St Local 20 738 82 1,722 76 73 60 75 Mod V Good 14 9 75
1734 Christensen Rd NORTH END Baker Blvd Local 20 1,253 139 2,924 49 61 60 53 Mod Fair 35 17 52
1175 Christensen Rd Baker Blvd Christensen Rd Local 19 249 26 552 60 45 60 55 Mod Fair 31 8 55
1395 Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Local 19 82 9 182 90 70 60 83 Mod V Good 4 6 83
1177 Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Local 19 82 9 182 87 68 60 80 Mod V Good 9 4 80
1176 Christensen Rd Strander Blvd Christensen Rd Local 19 802 85 1,778 56 34 60 49 Mod Marginal 32 12 48
1150 Corporate Dr N WEST END Andover Park W Local 19 424 45 940 86 67 60 80 Mod V Good 9 5 79
1149 Corporate Dr N Corporate Dr N Corporate Dr N Local 19 206 22 457 84 65 60 78 Mod V Good 13 3 77
1577 Corporate Dr S Corporate Dr S Corporate Dr S Local 20 203 23 474 69 46 60 62 Mod Good 16 15 61
1249 Corporate Dr S WEST END Andover Park W Local 20 427 47 996 79 59 60 72 Mod V Good 10 11 72
1001 Costco Dr Andover Park E DS@280E Andover Park E Local 20 280 31 653 61 43 60 55 Mod Fair 28 11 55
1162 East Marginal Way S CITY LIMIT S 81st Pl Principal Arterial 44 723 177 3,711 56 75 30 62 Weak Good 34 10 61
1428 East Marginal Way S S 81st Pl S 87th Pl Principal Arterial 44 2,601 636 13,352 64 78 60 69 Mod Good 24 11 68
1997 East Marginal Way S S 87th Pl S 90th St Principal Arterial 44 524 128 2,690 70 79 30 73 Weak V Good 23 6 73
1157 East Marginal Way S S 90th St S 94th Pl Principal Arterial 44 1,667 407 8,557 64 76 30 68 Weak Good 29 7 67
1531 East Marginal Way S S 94th Pl S 96th Pl Principal Arterial 44 718 176 3,686 69 72 60 70 Mod V Good 23 8 69
1882 East Marginal Way S S 96th Pl S Norfolk St Principal Arterial 44 1,742 426 8,942 44 72 60 54 Mod Fair 38 15 53
1528 East Marginal Way S S Norfolk St S 102nd St Principal Arterial 44 386 94 1,981 52 81 60 62 Mod Good 31 18 61
1874 East Marginal Way S S 102nd St S 104th St Principal Arterial 44 587 143 3,013 54 83 30 64 Weak Good 33 13 63
1165 East Marginal Way S S 104th St DS@507S S 104th St Principal Arterial 44 507 124 2,603 55 74 60 61 Mod Good 32 13 61
1881 East Marginal Way S DS@507S S 104th St Boeing Access Rd Principal Arterial 44 314 77 1,612 63 80 30 69 Weak Good 27 10 69
1864 East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 19 747 79 1,656 54 76 30 61 Weak Good 36 10 61
1877 East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Tukwila Intl Blvd Principal Arterial 43 242 58 1,214 57 76 30 63 Weak Good 35 8 63
1009 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Tukwila Intl Blvd Principal Arterial 44 82 20 421 62 65 60 63 Mod Good 30 8 63
1423 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Boeing Access Rd Principal Arterial 44 52 13 267 93 79 60 88 Mod Excellent 6 2 88
1008 East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Tukwila Intl Blvd Minor Arterial 30 197 33 690 66 53 60 61 Mod Good 30 4 61
1883 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Boeing Access Rd Local 30 309 52 1,082 53 48 60 52 Mod Fair 33 14 51
1010 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd S 112th St Minor Arterial 30 1,358 226 4,753 44 64 60 50 Mod Fair 43 14 50
1427 East Marginal Way S S 112th St S 115th St Minor Arterial 30 713 119 2,496 45 70 60 53 Mod Fair 38 17 53
1869 East Marginal Way S S 115th St S 116th St Minor Arterial 30 671 112 2,349 43 69 60 52 Mod Fair 40 17 51
1687 East Marginal Way S S 116th St Interurban Ave S Minor Arterial 30 392 65 1,372 38 69 60 49 Mod Marginal 33 13 48
2092 East Marginal Way S Interurban Ave S SR 599 Minor Arterial 30 312 52 1,092 53 30 60 45 Mod Marginal 36 11 45
2086 East Marginal Way S SR 599 S 120th Pl Minor Arterial 30 603 101 2,111 70 62 60 67 Mod Good 22 8 67
1391 East Marginal Way S S 120th Pl S 124th St Minor Arterial 30 1,254 209 4,389 68 79 30 71 Weak V Good 26 6 71
1875 East Marginal Way S S 124th St S 126th St Minor Arterial 30 899 150 3,147 70 76 60 72 Mod V Good 22 8 72
1160 East Marginal Way S S 126th St S 128th St Minor Arterial 30 353 59 1,236 55 72 60 60 Mod Good 29 16 60
1868 East Marginal Way S S 128th St S 128th St Minor Arterial 30 170 28 595 49 64 60 54 Mod Fair 31 20 54
1866 East Marginal Way S S 128th St S 130th St Minor Arterial 30 519 87 1,817 56 60 60 58 Mod Fair 30 14 57
1158 East Marginal Way S S 130th St 40th Ave S Minor Arterial 30 113 19 396 57 48 60 54 Mod Fair 29 14 54
1426 East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S S 133rd St Minor Arterial 30 893 149 3,126 56 56 60 56 Mod Fair 31 13 56
1508 Evans Black Dr WEST END Andover Park E Local 30 567 95 1,985 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 9 4 81
1954 Fort Dent Way Interurban Ave S Starfire Way Local 29 688 111 2,328 71 54 60 65 Mod Good 22 7 65
1510 Fun Center Way Interurban Ave S DS@447E Interurban Ave S Local 22 447 55 1,147 80 61 60 73 Mod V Good 14 6 73
1364 Fun Center Way DS@447E Interurban Ave S SW Grady Way Local 20 112 12 261 55 34 60 48 Mod Marginal 30 15 48
1696 Gateway Dr Interurban Ave S S 133rd St Local 21 2,527 295 6,191 74 71 60 73 Mod V Good 19 6 73
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 13 of 17127
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1494 Glacier St WEST END Olympic Ave S Local 27 250 38 788 88 69 60 81 Mod V Good 8 4 81
1405 Glacier St Olympic Ave S Cascade Ave S Local 26 609 88 1,847 79 77 60 79 Mod V Good 14 6 78
1551 Grady Way Interurban Ave S Interurban Ave S Local 27 154 23 485 47 57 60 51 Mod Fair 38 15 50
1346 Grady Way Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way Minor Arterial 45 117 29 614 55 59 60 56 Mod Fair 34 11 56
1002 Industry Dr Andover Park E DS@355E Andover Park E Local 22 355 43 911 68 65 60 67 Mod Good 19 12 67
1994 Interurban Ave S East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S Minor Arterial 30 1,013 169 3,546 47 78 30 57 Weak Fair 38 15 57
1159 Interurban Ave S 40th Ave S Macadam Rd S Minor Arterial 30 2,868 478 10,038 45 84 60 58 Mod Fair 36 19 57
1998 Interurban Ave S Macadam Rd S Gateway Dr Minor Arterial 30 997 166 3,490 47 66 60 53 Mod Fair 36 17 52
1218 Interurban Ave S Gateway Dr SR 599 Ramp Minor Arterial 30 500 83 1,750 59 80 60 66 Mod Good 27 14 65
1164 Interurban Ave S SR 599 Ramp S 133rd St Minor Arterial 30 284 47 994 68 69 60 69 Mod Good 21 11 68
1879 Interurban Ave S S 133rd St SR 599 Ramp Minor Arterial 30 276 46 966 60 67 60 63 Mod Good 27 11 62
1161 Interurban Ave S SR 599 Ramp 48th Ave S Minor Arterial 30 767 128 2,685 66 71 60 68 Mod Good 23 11 67
1559 Interurban Ave S 48th Ave S I-5 Ramp Principal Arterial 55 127 39 815 61 36 60 53 Mod Fair 24 15 52
1873 Interurban Ave S I-5 Ramp I-5 Ramp Principal Arterial 55 573 175 3,677 52 59 60 54 Mod Fair 35 13 54
1878 Interurban Ave S I-5 Ramp 56th Ave S Principal Arterial 55 607 185 3,895 55 65 60 58 Mod Fair 30 15 57
1871 Interurban Ave S 56th Ave S S 140th St Principal Arterial 55 2,142 655 13,745 42 72 30 52 Weak Fair 47 11 51
1880 Interurban Ave S S 140th St 58th Ave S Principal Arterial 55 829 253 5,319 49 63 60 54 Mod Fair 36 15 53
1167 Interurban Ave S 58th Ave S S 143rd St Principal Arterial 56 615 191 4,018 49 59 60 53 Mod Fair 34 17 52
1011 Interurban Ave S S 143rd St S 143rd Pl Principal Arterial 56 339 105 2,215 63 71 60 66 Mod Good 27 11 65
1424 Interurban Ave S S 143rd Pl S 144th St Principal Arterial 56 344 107 2,247 91 90 60 90 Mod Excellent 6 4 90
1870 Interurban Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Principal Arterial 56 916 285 5,985 82 79 60 81 Mod V Good 14 5 80
1865 Interurban Ave S S 147th St S 149th St Principal Arterial 56 604 188 3,946 79 67 60 75 Mod V Good 16 6 74
1999 Interurban Ave S S 149th St I-405 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 1,953 608 12,760 70 71 60 71 Mod V Good 22 7 70
1392 Interurban Ave S I-405 Ramp DS@490E I-405 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 490 152 3,201 47 51 60 48 Mod Marginal 44 9 47
1867 Interurban Ave S DS@490E I-405 Ramp Fun Center Way Principal Arterial 56 125 39 817 64 58 60 62 Mod Good 28 8 61
1996 Interurban Ave S Interurban Ave S Southcenter Blvd Local 22 387 47 993 57 58 60 57 Mod Fair 32 11 57
1562 Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way SW Grady Way Principal Arterial 55 231 71 1,482 56 50 60 54 Mod Fair 32 12 53
1872 Interurban Ave S SW Grady Way West Valley Hwy Principal Arterial 55 141 43 905 43 60 60 48 Mod Marginal 39 19 48
1876 Interurban Ave S West Valley Hwy SW Grady Way Local 22 164 20 421 50 39 60 46 Mod Marginal 32 18 46
1839 Interurban Pl S 40th Ave S SE END Local 22 478 58 1,227 81 62 60 75 Mod V Good 15 4 74
1397 Klickitat Dr 51st Ave S 53rd Ave S Minor Arterial 30 877 146 3,070 71 71 30 71 Weak V Good 25 4 70
1248 Klickitat Dr 53rd Ave S I-5 Ramp Minor Arterial 30 1,089 182 3,812 55 83 30 65 Weak Good 34 11 64
1398 Klickitat Dr I-5 Ramp Southcenter Pkwy Minor Arterial 30 1,052 175 3,682 54 63 60 57 Mod Fair 30 14 56
1375 Longacres Way West Valley Hwy Nelsen Pl Local 22 400 49 1,027 85 66 60 78 Mod V Good 9 6 78
1948 Macadam Rd S Interurban Ave S SR 599 Collector 35 123 24 502 48 28 60 41 Mod Marginal 35 17 41
1316 Macadam Rd S SR 599 SR 599 Collector 35 104 20 425 74 63 60 70 Mod V Good 19 7 70
1947 Macadam Rd S SR 599 S 128th St Collector 35 192 37 784 75 55 60 68 Mod Good 20 5 68
1312 Macadam Rd S S 128th St S 130th St Collector 35 271 53 1,107 87 68 60 81 Mod V Good 8 4 80
1495 Macadam Rd S S 130th St S 131st Pl Collector 35 531 103 2,168 79 71 60 76 Mod V Good 17 5 76
1314 Macadam Rd S S 131st Pl S 133rd St Collector 35 534 104 2,181 73 63 60 70 Mod Good 22 5 69
1946 Macadam Rd S S 133rd St 43rd Ave S Collector 35 338 66 1,380 69 63 60 67 Mod Good 24 7 67
1317 Macadam Rd S 43rd Ave S S 136th St Collector 35 1,710 333 6,983 45 59 60 50 Mod Marginal 37 18 49
1944 Macadam Rd S S 136th St S 137th St Collector 34 308 58 1,222 47 56 60 50 Mod Marginal 38 15 49
1315 Macadam Rd S S 137th St S 138th St Collector 34 783 148 3,106 48 58 60 51 Mod Fair 38 15 51
1945 Macadam Rd S S 138th St S 144th St Collector 34 1,997 377 7,921 49 64 60 54 Mod Fair 37 14 53
1098 Macadam Rd S S 144th St S 149th Ln Collector 34 1,662 314 6,593 61 69 30 64 Weak Good 32 7 63
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 14 of 17128
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
2064 Macadam Rd S S 149th Ln S 150th St Collector 34 195 37 774 62 61 60 62 Mod Good 29 9 61
1943 Macadam Rd S S 150th St S 152nd St Collector 34 867 164 3,439 44 65 60 51 Mod Fair 34 21 51
1313 Macadam Rd S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Collector 34 1,451 274 5,756 54 73 60 60 Mod Good 27 19 59
1318 Martin L King Jr Way S CITY LIMIT S 104th Pl Principal Arterial 56 114 35 745 75 72 60 74 Mod V Good 14 10 74
1812 Martin L King Jr Way S Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 163 51 1,065 60 54 60 58 Mod Fair 28 12 57
1319 Martin L King Jr Way S I-5 Ramp I-5 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 1,943 604 12,694 47 77 30 57 Weak Fair 38 15 56
1813 Martin L King Jr Way S I-5 Ramp I-5 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 586 182 3,829 52 87 30 64 Weak Good 35 13 64
1148 Martin L King Jr Way S I-5 Ramp CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial 56 1,935 602 12,642 53 87 30 65 Weak Good 32 15 64
1593 Midland Dr WEST END Andover Park W Local 22 900 110 2,310 39 50 60 43 Mod Marginal 44 18 42
1614 Military Rd S S 158th St EAST END Local 25 187 26 545 68 46 60 61 Mod Good 17 4 60
1355 Minkler Blvd Southcenter Pkwy Bauch Dr Collector 35 1,314 256 5,366 58 62 60 60 Mod Fair 30 9 59
2019 Minkler Blvd Bauch Dr Andover Park W Collector 35 672 131 2,744 65 66 60 65 Mod Good 24 11 65
1365 Minkler Blvd Andover Park W Andover Park E Collector 33 903 166 3,477 67 59 60 64 Mod Good 21 12 64
1357 Minkler Blvd Andover Park E Industry Dr Local 22 585 72 1,502 30 45 60 35 Mod Poor 51 19 34
1372 Minkler Blvd Industry Dr EAST END Local 23 598 76 1,605 51 52 60 52 Mod Fair 31 17 51
1378 Nelsen Pl S 156th St Longacres Way Local 24 571 76 1,599 60 37 60 52 Mod Fair 34 6 52
1707 Norfolk St East Marginal Way S CITY LIMIT Local 25 737 102 2,150 56 71 60 61 Mod Good 33 11 60
1834 Olympic Ave S Riverside Dr Todd Blvd Local 25 865 120 2,523 75 72 60 74 Mod V Good 16 9 74
1633 Olympic Ave S Todd Blvd S Glacier St Local 22 853 104 2,189 70 70 60 70 Mod V Good 17 13 69
1371 Orillia Rd S S 188th St S 200th St Principal Arterial 56 3,525 1,097 23,030 36 79 30 50 Weak Fair 46 16 49
1645 Orillia Rd S S 200th St S 204th St Principal Arterial 56 1,602 498 10,466 52 80 60 61 Mod Good 31 13 61
1823 Pamela Dr 57th Ave S NE END Local 19 405 43 898 89 69 60 82 Mod V Good 8 4 82
1664 Pamela Dr Pamela Dr Pamela Dr Local 19 178 19 395 90 70 60 83 Mod V Good 4 6 83
1213 Riverside Dr Olympic Ave S Cascade Ave S Local 19 480 51 1,064 73 87 30 78 Weak V Good 19 7 78
1420 Ryan St Beacon Ave S 51st Ave S Minor Arterial 45 349 87 1,832 46 57 60 50 Mod Marginal 34 20 49
1827 Ryan Way Martin L King Jr Way S 47th Ave S Minor Arterial 45 978 245 5,135 40 60 60 47 Mod Marginal 41 19 46
1377 Ryan Way 47th Ave S S 107th St Minor Arterial 45 227 57 1,192 43 64 60 50 Mod Marginal 36 21 49
1826 Ryan Way S 107th St Beacon Ave S Minor Arterial 45 1,126 282 5,912 36 67 60 46 Mod Marginal 40 21 46
1622 Slade Way S 160th St 53rd Pl S Local 26 837 121 2,539 62 58 60 61 Mod Good 23 15 60
1621 Slade Way 53rd Pl S 54th Ave S Local 25 314 44 916 48 40 60 46 Mod Marginal 35 17 45
1818 Southcenter Blvd International Blvd 38th Ln S Minor Arterial 45 838 210 4,400 66 61 60 64 Mod Good 27 7 64
1342 Southcenter Blvd 38th Ln S 40th Ave S Minor Arterial 42 432 101 2,117 53 63 60 56 Mod Fair 30 6 56
1413 Southcenter Blvd 40th Ave S 40th Ave S Minor Arterial 42 145 34 711 62 60 60 61 Mod Good 31 8 60
1168 Southcenter Blvd 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Minor Arterial 44 566 138 2,905 56 60 60 57 Mod Fair 37 7 57
1340 Southcenter Blvd 42nd Ave S 51st Ave S Minor Arterial 44 2,694 659 13,829 74 73 60 74 Mod V Good 21 6 73
2025 Southcenter Blvd 51st Ave S 52nd Ave S Minor Arterial 45 371 93 1,948 80 78 60 80 Mod V Good 14 6 79
1337 Southcenter Blvd 52nd Ave S 53rd Ave S Minor Arterial 45 301 75 1,580 75 74 60 75 Mod V Good 18 6 75
2043 Southcenter Blvd 53rd Ave S I-5 Ramp Minor Arterial 45 171 43 898 59 54 60 57 Mod Fair 30 12 56
2042 Southcenter Blvd I-5 Ramp I-5 Fwy Minor Arterial 45 69 17 362 89 82 60 87 Mod Excellent 8 2 86
2041 Southcenter Blvd I-5 Fwy I-5 Fwy Minor Arterial 56 38 12 248 83 100 60 89 Mod Excellent 11 6 88
2039 Southcenter Blvd I-5 Fwy I-5 Fwy Minor Arterial 41 99 23 474 69 81 60 73 Mod V Good 21 10 73
2037 Southcenter Blvd I-5 Fwy I-5 Ramp Minor Arterial 41 68 15 325 64 84 30 71 Weak V Good 26 9 70
2035 Southcenter Blvd I-5 Ramp I-5 Fwy Minor Arterial 41 76 17 364 98 89 60 95 Mod Excellent 0 2 95
2031 Southcenter Blvd I-5 Ramp I-405 Ramp Minor Arterial 40 362 80 1,689 52 76 30 60 Weak Fair 37 11 59
1348 Southcenter Blvd I-405 Ramp I-405 Ramp Principal Arterial 45 452 113 2,373 57 76 30 63 Weak Good 33 10 63
1347 Southcenter Blvd I-405 Ramp DS@398E I-405 Ramp Principal Arterial 45 398 100 2,090 84 72 60 80 Mod V Good 12 4 80
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 15 of 17129
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1821 Southcenter Blvd DS@398E I-405 Ramp 61st Ave S Principal Arterial 44 779 190 3,999 87 79 60 84 Mod V Good 9 5 84
1416 Southcenter Blvd 61st Ave S 62nd Ave S Principal Arterial 44 469 115 2,408 86 68 60 80 Mod V Good 9 4 80
1820 Southcenter Blvd 62nd Ave S 65th Ave S Principal Arterial 44 1,142 279 5,862 82 78 60 81 Mod V Good 14 4 80
1629 Southcenter Blvd 65th Ave S 66th Ave S Principal Arterial 44 587 143 3,013 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 16 5 72
1686 Southcenter Blvd 66th Ave S I-405 Ramp Local 25 649 90 1,893 79 63 60 74 Mod V Good 15 6 73
1415 Southcenter Blvd I-405 Ramp I-405 Ramp Local 26 60 9 182 81 82 60 82 Mod V Good 15 4 81
1554 Southcenter Blvd I-405 Ramp Interurban Ave S Local 27 77 12 243 91 85 60 89 Mod Excellent 0 9 89
1507 Southcenter Blvd Interurban Ave S Interurban Ave S Local 25 261 36 761 69 53 60 64 Mod Good 24 7 63
1769 Southcenter Pkwy Southcenter Mall I-5 Ramp Minor Arterial 45 622 156 3,266 77 78 30 77 Weak V Good 19 4 77
1767 Southcenter Pkwy I-5 Ramp I-5 Ramp Minor Arterial 45 162 41 851 76 59 60 70 Mod V Good 20 4 70
1770 Southcenter Pkwy I-5 Ramp Klickitat Dr Minor Arterial 45 383 96 2,011 98 89 60 95 Mod Excellent 1 1 95
1768 Southcenter Pkwy Klickitat Dr I-5 Ramp Minor Arterial 45 361 90 1,895 72 80 30 74 Weak V Good 25 4 74
1776 Southcenter Pkwy I-5 Ramp Strander Blvd Minor Arterial 45 218 55 1,145 62 66 60 64 Mod Good 29 9 63
1775 Southcenter Pkwy Strander Blvd S 168th St Minor Arterial 45 1,313 328 6,893 60 62 60 61 Mod Good 27 13 60
1774 Southcenter Pkwy S 168th St Wig Blvd Minor Arterial 45 666 167 3,497 62 73 60 66 Mod Good 22 16 65
1691 Southcenter Pkwy Wig Blvd Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial 45 599 150 3,145 59 64 60 61 Mod Good 29 13 60
2063 Southcenter Pkwy Minkler Blvd S 180th St Minor Arterial 45 2,716 679 14,259 77 73 60 76 Mod V Good 19 4 76
1467 Southcenter Pkwy S 180th St A Line Minor Arterial 45 900 225 4,725 83 78 60 81 Mod V Good 14 3 81
1472 Southcenter Pkwy A Line Segale Park C Dr Minor Arterial 45 613 153 3,218 83 93 60 86 Mod Excellent 12 5 86
1693 Southcenter Pkwy Segale Park C Dr B Line Minor Arterial 45 977 244 5,129 86 89 60 87 Mod Excellent 12 2 87
1695 Southcenter Pkwy B Line C Line Minor Arterial 45 650 163 3,413 87 91 60 88 Mod Excellent 11 2 88
1764 Southcenter Pkwy C Line S 19000 Block Minor Arterial 45 770 193 4,043 89 91 60 89 Mod Excellent 9 3 89
1773 Southcenter Pkwy S 19000 Block S 19400 Block Minor Arterial 45 1,030 258 5,408 86 90 60 88 Mod Excellent 12 2 87
1778 Southcenter Pkwy S 19400 Block UnNamed-01543 Minor Arterial 45 1,150 288 6,038 87 88 60 87 Mod Excellent 11 2 87
1343 Southcenter Pkwy UnNamed-01543 UnNamed-01545 Minor Arterial 45 540 135 2,835 96 91 60 94 Mod Excellent 3 1 93
1352 Southcenter Pkwy UnNamed-01545 S 200th St Minor Arterial 45 752 188 3,948 78 73 30 76 Weak V Good 19 3 76
1705 Starfire Way DS@1178E Starfire Way Fort Dent Way Local 27 1,353 203 4,262 91 73 60 85 Mod V Good 5 4 85
1303 Strander Blvd Southcenter Pkwy 61st Pl S Minor Arterial 47 1,350 353 7,403 55 58 60 56 Mod Fair 37 8 56
1307 Strander Blvd 61st Pl S Andover Park W Minor Arterial 47 662 173 3,630 53 62 30 56 Weak Fair 43 4 55
1305 Strander Blvd Andover Park W Andover Park E Minor Arterial 48 1,077 287 6,031 60 61 60 60 Mod Good 30 11 59
1306 Strander Blvd Andover Park E Christensen Rd Minor Arterial 48 771 206 4,318 59 60 60 60 Mod Fair 31 10 59
1304 Strander Blvd Christensen Rd West Valley Hwy Minor Arterial 48 847 226 4,743 71 49 60 64 Mod Good 17 12 63
1302 Strander Blvd West Valley Hwy EAST END Local 26 239 35 725 34 28 60 32 Mod Poor 52 14 31
1290 Todd Blvd Olympic Ave S Cascade Ave S Local 32 642 114 2,397 61 64 60 62 Mod Good 32 8 61
1291 Todd Blvd Cascade Ave S West Valley Hwy S Local 25 353 49 1,030 63 67 60 64 Mod Good 27 10 64
1384 Treck Dr WEST END Andover Park E Local 25 543 75 1,584 56 61 60 58 Mod Fair 30 14 57
1845 Treck Dr Treck Dr Treck Dr Local 27 204 31 643 75 54 60 68 Mod Good 15 10 67
1129 Triland Dr WEST END Andover Park W Local 27 1,174 176 3,698 48 45 60 47 Mod Marginal 28 12 46
1104 Tukwila International Blvd SR 99 Ramp Tukwila Intl Blvd Principal Arterial 56 2,111 657 13,792 77 86 30 80 Weak V Good 20 3 79
2002 Tukwila International Blvd Tukwila Intl Blvd S 132nd St Principal Arterial 56 302 94 1,973 88 90 60 89 Mod Excellent 10 2 89
2124 Tukwila Intl Blvd DS@91S East Marginal Way S DS@509S East Marginal Way S Principal Arterial 56 418 130 2,731 55 69 30 60 Weak Fair 36 8 59
1082 Tukwila Intl Blvd DS@172S Boeing Access Rd DS@608S Boeing Access Rd Local 25 436 61 1,272 49 77 30 58 Weak Fair 40 11 57
1083 Tukwila Intl Blvd DS@509S East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Principal Arterial 56 146 45 954 63 80 30 69 Weak Good 30 6 68
1084 Tukwila Intl Blvd DS@193S East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local 32 209 37 780 56 58 60 57 Mod Fair 31 12 56
1075 Tukwila Intl Blvd DS@608S East Marginal Way S S 112th St Principal Arterial 44 1,027 251 5,272 44 75 60 54 Mod Fair 36 20 54
1081 Tukwila Intl Blvd Tukwila Intl Blvd East Marginal Way S Principal Arterial 56 144 45 941 79 60 60 73 Mod V Good 17 4 72
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 16 of 17130
City of Tukwila, WA
Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name Condition Summary
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
C
L
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
i
d
t
h
(
f
t
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
Ad
d
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
(
y
d
2
)
Su
r
f
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
D
I
)
Ro
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
I
n
d
e
x
(
R
I
)
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
I
n
d
e
x
(
S
I
)
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
n
d
t
n
I
n
d
e
x
(
P
C
I
)
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
R
a
t
i
n
g
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
n
g
Lo
a
d
A
s
s
o
c
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
L
A
D
D
)
No
n
-
L
o
a
d
D
i
s
t
r
e
s
s
D
e
d
u
c
t
s
(
N
L
A
D
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
P
C
I
(
C
P
C
I
)
1074 Tukwila Intl Blvd East Marginal Way S DS@193S East Marginal Way S Local 22 193 24 495 73 53 60 66 Mod Good 20 7 66
1073 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 112th St SR 99 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 1,193 371 7,794 45 70 60 54 Mod Fair 38 16 53
1079 Tukwila Intl Blvd SR 99 Ramp SR 599 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 107 33 699 64 61 60 63 Mod Good 25 12 62
1078 Tukwila Intl Blvd SR 599 Ramp SR 99 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 196 61 1,281 52 76 60 60 Mod Good 34 13 60
1077 Tukwila Intl Blvd SR 99 Ramp SR 99 Principal Arterial 56 230 72 1,503 45 63 60 51 Mod Fair 41 14 50
1076 Tukwila Intl Blvd SR 99 SR 599 Principal Arterial 56 192 60 1,254 63 85 30 71 Weak V Good 27 10 70
1715 Tukwila Intl Blvd SR 599 S 116th Way Principal Arterial 56 121 38 791 53 41 60 49 Mod Marginal 32 15 49
1080 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 116th Way SR 99 Principal Arterial 56 634 197 4,142 59 70 30 63 Weak Good 33 8 62
1429 Tukwila Intl Blvd SR 99 SR 99 Ramp Principal Arterial 56 1,468 457 9,591 58 94 30 70 Weak V Good 29 13 69
2003 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 130th St 35th Ave S Principal Arterial 56 346 108 2,261 71 71 60 71 Mod V Good 23 6 71
2010 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 132nd St 37th Ave S Principal Arterial 56 604 188 3,946 83 78 60 81 Mod V Good 14 3 81
2009 Tukwila Intl Blvd 37th Ave S S 139th St Principal Arterial 56 2,015 627 13,165 82 86 60 83 Mod V Good 15 3 83
1438 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 139th St S 140th St Principal Arterial 56 340 106 2,221 62 81 30 69 Weak Good 28 10 68
1887 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 140th St S 141st St Principal Arterial 56 238 74 1,555 57 78 30 64 Weak Good 32 11 63
1105 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 141st St S 141st St Principal Arterial 56 127 40 830 64 79 60 69 Mod Good 25 11 69
1672 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 141st St S 142nd St Principal Arterial 56 344 107 2,247 68 87 30 74 Weak V Good 25 7 74
1886 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 142nd St S 144th St Principal Arterial 56 679 211 4,436 65 73 30 68 Weak Good 30 4 67
1885 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 144th St S 146th St Principal Arterial 56 699 217 4,567 48 75 30 57 Weak Fair 47 5 56
1884 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 146th St S 148th St Principal Arterial 56 699 217 4,567 61 72 60 65 Mod Good 30 9 64
1439 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 148th St S 150th St Principal Arterial 56 700 218 4,573 55 79 30 63 Weak Good 33 12 62
1437 Tukwila Intl Blvd S 150th St S 152nd St Principal Arterial 56 704 219 4,599 35 68 30 46 Weak Marginal 55 10 45
1054 Tukwila Pkwy Southcenter Mall 61st Ave S Minor Arterial 70 1,193 464 9,743 85 83 60 85 Mod V Good 12 3 84
1055 Tukwila Pkwy 61st Ave S I-405 Ramp Minor Arterial 65 506 183 3,837 78 74 60 77 Mod V Good 17 5 76
1056 Tukwila Pkwy I-405 Ramp Andover Park W Minor Arterial 66 574 210 4,420 83 76 60 81 Mod V Good 13 3 81
1053 Tukwila Pkwy Andover Park W Andover Park E Minor Arterial 68 1,088 411 8,631 86 72 60 81 Mod V Good 11 3 81
2133 Tukwila Pkwy Andover Park E I-405 Ramp Minor Arterial 67 458 170 3,580 87 68 60 80 Mod V Good 8 5 80
1746 Upland Dr WEST END Andover Park W Local 20 919 102 2,144 77 61 60 72 Mod V Good 18 5 71
1394 Wallace St NW END CITY LIMIT Local 26 328 47 995 65 37 60 55 Mod Fair 21 15 55
1518 West Marginal Pl S CITY LIMIT S 102nd St Local 21 2,203 257 5,397 26 65 60 39 Mod Poor 55 16 38
1292 West Valley Hwy Interurban Ave S I-405 Ramp Principal Arterial 55 556 170 3,568 71 81 30 74 Weak V Good 22 7 74
1295 West Valley Hwy I-405 Ramp Longacres Way Principal Arterial 56 594 185 3,881 86 76 60 83 Mod V Good 10 4 83
1550 West Valley Hwy Longacres Way Strander Blvd Principal Arterial 56 1,529 476 9,989 79 79 30 79 Weak V Good 19 3 78
1293 West Valley Hwy Strander Blvd S 180th St Principal Arterial 58 5,933 1,912 40,147 67 85 30 73 Weak V Good 30 3 72
1294 West Valley Hwy S 180th St Todd Blvd Principal Arterial 60 2,082 694 14,574 67 80 30 71 Weak V Good 30 3 70
1498 West Valley Hwy S Todd Blvd CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial 59 975 320 6,711 62 73 30 66 Weak Good 30 8 65
1665 Wig Blvd Southcenter Pkwy Bauch Dr Local 22 1,325 162 3,401 74 55 60 68 Mod Good 21 5 67
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Inventory, 8/21/2020 page 17 of 17131
Appendix B
$1.05M/Year Rehabilitation Plans by Segment
132
City of Tukwila, WA Current PCI Date:7/16/2020
Street Inventory and Five Year Rehabilitation Plan By Segment $1050k/Year Rehabilitation Plan Analysis Start Date:1/1/2021
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ye
a
r
o
f
F
i
r
s
t
R
e
h
a
b
Se
g
m
e
n
t
R
e
h
a
b
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Re
h
a
b
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Re
h
a
b
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Av
g
U
n
i
t
R
a
t
e
(
$
/
y
d
2
)
Se
g
m
e
n
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
Se
g
m
e
n
t
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
Wh
o
l
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
5
Y
e
a
r
P
o
s
t
R
e
h
a
b
P
C
I
1001 Costco Dr Andover Park E DS@280E Andover Park E 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 25,794 25,794 148,521 90
1593 Midland Dr WEST END Andover Park W 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 91,245 91,245 237,316 90
1357 Minkler Blvd Andover Park E Industry Dr 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 59,329 59,329 148,521 90
1372 Minkler Blvd Industry Dr EAST END 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 63,398 63,398 148,521 90
1601 140th St 34th Ave S 37th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 45,899 45,899 202,201 90
1604 140th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 38,197 38,197 202,201 90
1484 140th St 38th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 41,791 41,791 202,201 90
1589 141st St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 76,314 76,314 202,201 90
1677 144th St Military Rd S 34th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 25,970 25,970 133,734 87
2016 144th St 34th Ave S 34th Ln S 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 23,529 23,529 133,734 87
2015 144th St 34th Ln S 37th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 40,292 40,292 133,734 87
1187 144th St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 43,943 43,943 133,734 87
1775 Southcenter Pkwy Strander Blvd S 168th St 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)24.00 165,432 165,432 324,840 87
1774 Southcenter Pkwy S 168th St Wig Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)24.00 83,928 83,928 324,840 87
1691 Southcenter Pkwy Wig Blvd Minkler Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)24.00 75,480 75,480 324,840 87
1129 Triland Dr WEST END Andover Park W 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 146,071 146,071 237,316 90
1454 200th St Southcenter Pkwy CITY LIMIT 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 427,746 427,746 427,746 90
1420 Ryan St Beacon Ave S 51st Ave S 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 79,692 79,692 336,864 91
1827 Ryan Way Martin L King Jr Way S 47th Ave S 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 223,373 223,373 275,225 91
1377 Ryan Way 47th Ave S S 107th St 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 51,852 51,852 275,225 91
1826 Ryan Way S 107th St Beacon Ave S 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 257,172 257,172 336,864 91
1978 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 88,043 88,043 370,189 92
1754 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp Airport Way S 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 39,221 39,221 370,189 92
1750 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp I-5 Ramp 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 86,632 86,632 370,189 92
1755 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp Martin L King Jr Ramp 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 88,088 88,088 370,189 92
1975 Boeing Access Rd Martin L King Jr Ramp Martin L King Jr Way S 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 68,205 68,205 370,189 92
1871 Interurban Ave S 56th Ave S S 140th St 3 Selected Yr 3 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 48.00 659,760 659,760 659,760 92
1353 143rd Pl Interurban Ave S EAST END 3 Selected Yr 3 23 MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch 7.75 19,724 19,724 19,724 86
1790 44th Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 56,920 56,920 122,056 94
1969 61st Ave S Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Pkwy 4 Selected Yr 4 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 45.50 124,625 124,625 198,290 94
1955 66th Ave S Southcenter Blvd I-405 Ramp 4 Selected Yr 4 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 45.50 45,728 45,728 198,290 94
1880 Interurban Ave S S 140th St 58th Ave S 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 242,015 242,015 424,834 94
1167 Interurban Ave S 58th Ave S S 143rd St 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 182,819 182,819 424,834 94
1392 Interurban Ave S I-405 Ramp DS@490E I-405 Ramp 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 145,646 145,646 291,429 94
1867 Interurban Ave S DS@490E I-405 Ramp Fun Center Way 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 37,174 37,174 291,429 94
1562 Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way SW Grady Way 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 67,431 67,431 291,429 94
1872 Interurban Ave S SW Grady Way West Valley Hwy 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 41,178 41,178 291,429 94
1587 141st St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 65,136 65,136 122,056 94
1346 Grady Way Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way 4 Selected Yr 4 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 45.50 27,937 27,937 198,290 94
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Rehab By Segment, 8/21/2020 Page 1 of 2133
City of Tukwila, WA Current PCI Date:7/16/2020
Street Inventory and Five Year Rehabilitation Plan By Segment $1050k/Year Rehabilitation Plan Analysis Start Date:1/1/2021
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ye
a
r
o
f
F
i
r
s
t
R
e
h
a
b
Se
g
m
e
n
t
R
e
h
a
b
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Re
h
a
b
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Re
h
a
b
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Av
g
U
n
i
t
R
a
t
e
(
$
/
y
d
2
)
Se
g
m
e
n
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
Se
g
m
e
n
t
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
Wh
o
l
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
5
Y
e
a
r
P
o
s
t
R
e
h
a
b
P
C
I
1882 East Marginal Way S S 96th Pl S Norfolk St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 406,861 406,861 406,861 96
1008 East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Tukwila Intl Blvd 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 30,015 30,015 345,347 96
1010 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd S 112th St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 206,756 206,756 345,347 96
1427 East Marginal Way S S 112th St S 115th St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 108,576 108,576 345,347 96
1101 180th St West Valley Hwy S 180th St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 294,795 294,795 294,795 96
IMS Infrastructure Management Services TukwilaWA2020_ESA_Rev2, Rehab By Segment, 8/21/2020 Page 2 of 2134
Appendix C
$1.05M/Year Rehabilitation Plans by Year
135
City of Tukwila, WA Current PCI Date:7/16/2020
Street Inventory and Five Year Rehabilitation Plan By Year $1050k/Year Rehabilitation Plan Analysis Start Date:1/1/2021
GI
S
I
D
On
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fr
o
m
S
t
r
e
e
t
To
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ye
a
r
o
f
F
i
r
s
t
R
e
h
a
b
Se
g
m
e
n
t
R
e
h
a
b
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Re
h
a
b
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Re
h
a
b
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Av
g
U
n
i
t
R
a
t
e
(
$
/
y
d
2
)
Se
g
m
e
n
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
Se
g
m
e
n
t
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
Wh
o
l
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
(
$
)
5
Y
e
a
r
P
o
s
t
R
e
h
a
b
P
C
I
1001 Costco Dr Andover Park E DS@280E Andover Park E 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 25,794 25,794 148,521 90
1357 Minkler Blvd Andover Park E Industry Dr 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 59,329 59,329 148,521 90
1372 Minkler Blvd Industry Dr EAST END 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 63,398 63,398 148,521 90
1601 140th St 34th Ave S 37th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 45,899 45,899 202,201 90
1604 140th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 38,197 38,197 202,201 90
1484 140th St 38th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 41,791 41,791 202,201 90
1589 141st St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 76,314 76,314 202,201 90
1677 144th St Military Rd S 34th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 25,970 25,970 133,734 87
2016 144th St 34th Ave S 34th Ln S 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 23,529 23,529 133,734 87
2015 144th St 34th Ln S 37th Ave S 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 40,292 40,292 133,734 87
1187 144th St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)23.25 43,943 43,943 133,734 87
1775 Southcenter Pkwy Strander Blvd S 168th St 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)24.00 165,432 165,432 324,840 87
1774 Southcenter Pkwy S 168th St Wig Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)24.00 83,928 83,928 324,840 87
1691 Southcenter Pkwy Wig Blvd Minkler Blvd 1 Selected Yr 1 30 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)24.00 75,480 75,480 324,840 87
1593 Midland Dr WEST END Andover Park W 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 91,245 91,245 237,316 90
1129 Triland Dr WEST END Andover Park W 1 Selected Yr 1 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 146,071 146,071 237,316 90
1454 200th St Southcenter Pkwy CITY LIMIT 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 427,746 427,746 427,746 90
1827 Ryan Way Martin L King Jr Way S 47th Ave S 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 223,373 223,373 275,225 91
1377 Ryan Way 47th Ave S S 107th St 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 51,852 51,852 275,225 91
1420 Ryan St Beacon Ave S 51st Ave S 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 79,692 79,692 336,864 91
1826 Ryan Way S 107th St Beacon Ave S 2 Selected Yr 2 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 257,172 257,172 336,864 91
1978 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 88,043 88,043 370,189 92
1754 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp Airport Way S 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 39,221 39,221 370,189 92
1750 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp I-5 Ramp 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 86,632 86,632 370,189 92
1755 Boeing Access Rd I-5 Ramp Martin L King Jr Ramp 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 88,088 88,088 370,189 92
1975 Boeing Access Rd Martin L King Jr Ramp Martin L King Jr Way S 3 Selected Yr 3 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 68,205 68,205 370,189 92
1871 Interurban Ave S 56th Ave S S 140th St 3 Selected Yr 3 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 48.00 659,760 659,760 659,760 92
1353 143rd Pl Interurban Ave S EAST END 3 Selected Yr 3 23 MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch 7.75 19,724 19,724 19,724 86
1969 61st Ave S Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Pkwy 4 Selected Yr 4 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 45.50 124,625 124,625 198,290 94
1955 66th Ave S Southcenter Blvd I-405 Ramp 4 Selected Yr 4 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 45.50 45,728 45,728 198,290 94
1346 Grady Way Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way 4 Selected Yr 4 53 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 45.50 27,937 27,937 198,290 94
1880 Interurban Ave S S 140th St 58th Ave S 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 242,015 242,015 424,834 94
1167 Interurban Ave S 58th Ave S S 143rd St 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 182,819 182,819 424,834 94
1392 Interurban Ave S I-405 Ramp DS@490E I-405 Ramp 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 145,646 145,646 291,429 94
1867 Interurban Ave S DS@490E I-405 Ramp Fun Center Way 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 37,174 37,174 291,429 94
1562 Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way SW Grady Way 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 67,431 67,431 291,429 94
1872 Interurban Ave S SW Grady Way West Valley Hwy 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 41,178 41,178 291,429 94
1587 141st St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 65,136 65,136 122,056 94
1790 44th Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St 4 Selected Yr 4 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)39.50 56,920 56,920 122,056 94
1882 East Marginal Way S S 96th Pl S Norfolk St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 406,861 406,861 406,861 96
1008 East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Tukwila Intl Blvd 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 30,015 30,015 345,347 96
1010 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd S 112th St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 206,756 206,756 345,347 96
1427 East Marginal Way S S 112th St S 115th St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)43.50 108,576 108,576 345,347 96
1101 180th St West Valley Hwy S 180th St 5 Selected Yr 5 50 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)45.50 294,795 294,795 294,795 96
IMS Infrastructure Management Services Sierra Vista_Rehabilitation by Year Page 1of 1136
137
UV99
UV509
UV599
UV518
UV181
UV900
UV167
UV509
UV99 §¨¦405
§¨¦5
1 9 2 1
1 5 1 9
1 9 7 9
1483
1 4 1 5
2035
1797
2084
13
9
5
2
0
8
9
1
0
0
9
1739
1
0
4
9
1544
1 3 6 1
2098
1 6 1 5
1 1 4 1
2039
1650
1 3 1 6
1189
1 0 7 9
1 8 6 1
1
3
6
4
17 5 3
1 1 5 8
2085
1
3
1
8
1 1 0 9
1 7 5 7
1404
1387
1 7 1 5
2078
1 9 4 8
1847
1
1
0
5
1 4 6 3
1559
1
1
9
8
20
9
9
1244
1106
1119
1759
1 9 1 4
1 6 1 8 1185
1 8 5 2
1 7 9 1
1 2 6 1
1 8 9 8
1262
1 2 5 6 1 4 1 3
1
0
9
0
1 0 8 3
1250
1442
1 2 3 2
2155
1 6 3 6
1432
151
7
2070
15 5 1
1 0 6 9
1 0 9 6
1 0 0 6
1 8 1 1
1546
1 7 6 7
1
9
1
8
1849
1 8 1 2
1179
1 4 4 8
1590
175 4
2 0 9 4
1
8
6
8
2043
1971
1 3 2 9
1664
1
2
7
4
1588
1 6 6 2
19 1 7
1 1 5 6
1122
1646
2079
1436
1013
1215
1061
2
0
5
1
1 0 7 6
1 9 4 7
2
0
6
4
1 0 7 8
1
5
7
7
1
8
4
5
2 1 6 2
1 2 0 1
1690
1 1 4 9
1493
1 8 3 1
1252
1830
1 4 8 2
1854
1089
1153
1 0 5 9
1 0 0 7
1 2 4 7
1 0 8 4
1 9 2 6
1
8
8
9
1 8 5 7
1638
1940
1271
1188
1 9 06
1 7 7 6
1444
1543
1 2 7 7
1 1 1 1
1 6 3 7
1370
17 4 9
2 1 0 0
1 3 7 7
1 8 2 8
1 0 6 7
1 0 7 7
1509
1562
1 5 6 6
1 9 8 3
11 55
1
8
8
7
1591
13 0 2
1360
1 0 4 8
1 1 7 8
1376
19931505
1 1 6 9
1
9
5
5
1888
2 0 0 5
1173
1431
1414
1 1 7 5
1494
1435
155318161991
2076
2071
1434
1990 1386
1858
1 3 2 8
1 5 0 7
20 9 3
1642
1 9 5 3
1 9 5 9
1 3 2 5
1565
1694
1280
1720
1 3 1 2
1744
1502
1 8 0 8
1 7 8 6
1
1
1
5
1910
1879
1522
1989
1 2 3 0
1 0 9 3
10 0 1
2 0 5 8
1 1 9 6
20 9 5
20
83
1 0 4 5
1635
1164
2097
13 8 1
1171
1 2 1 1
1
2
0
3
1 3 2 6
2016
1 6 5 3
1 0 5 1
19 7 5
1 3 8 3
1 9 7 0
1284
1 7 9 5
1 2 3 3
1 3 3 1
1123
1908
1145
1337
1219
1900
1469
1118
2002
1172
1 8 9 0
1 2 7 6
1 5 2 3
1604
2 0 1 3 1520
1214
1 9 4 4
1 8 4 2
1
8
8
3
1298
2
0
0
4
2
0
9
2
1621
1
8
8
1
1596
1108
1802
1366
1743
1 1 4 3
1 3 8 8
1677
1 5 6 8
1 7 9 2 1701
1 5 7 1
1 2 1 6
1
0
6
6
1486
15
8
2
1
2
1
0
2 0 6 2
1394
1599
1 9 5 1
19 7 7
1300
1 6 1 6 1555
1 3 3 0
1440
1 1 7 0
1484
1 5 7 0
1186
1 2 5 4
1229
1
9
4
6
1 1 9 9
1958
1011
1748
1
4
3
8
1245
1102
1
4
2
4
1 6 7 2
1988
2003
2 0 1 1
1801
1907
1 0 7 2
1124
1420
1556
1 8 6 0
1291
1 9 6 1
1
1
6
0
1002
2 1 6 3
1 1 6 6
1600
1003
1 4 7 4
2031
1 7 6 8
1 8 5 9
1 5 3 0
1 6 2 8
1798
16051601
2025
17 5 0
1127
1542
1
9
7
2
19 7 8
1758
1491
1 5 6 9
1121
1 7 7 0
1
5
2
8
1850
1996
1 1 5 4
1 9 1 9
1489
11911678
1
6
8
7
17 5 5
1347
1375
1373
1 8 2 3
1 6 6 6
2023
1336
1903
1676
1585
1 7 3 6
2022
1
3
3
2
1 0 9 4
1512
1 0 6 5
1243
1 8 3 5
1679
1 9 8 0
1
1
8
0
1150
1 7 3 3
1 0 4 6
1192
1602
1737
1193
1249
1251
1197
1342
1805
1 9 1 3
1279
1 1 0 7
1 0 8 2
1 4 4 9
1 7 3 0
1510
1529
1348
2
1
3
3
1995
1 0 6 3
1 7 1 2
1416
1278
1039
2 0 2 1
1839
1213
1 2 0 9
186 2
1 8 5 5
1263
1 7 4 1
1 1 1 7
1 8 5 1
1 2 0 0
2102
1392
19 7 3
1 1 4 0
2015
1218
1 8 0 9
1 0 7 0
1055
1
1
6
5
1 1 4 2
1 2 0 4
1 2 4 0
1 5 7 2
1 1 1 2
1 8 6 6
1
9
9
7
1350
1893
1222
1 3 2 3
1369
1
4
9
5
1 5 6 7
1
3
1
4
1345
1716
1 7 9 6
1485 1598
1187
1 3 4 3
1384
1492
2073
1128
1643
1
1
1
4
1
2
9
2
1 1 6 8
1508
1547
1 9 5 2
1
3
7
8
1873
1056
1226
1 8 4 0
1560
1 2 0 5
1357
1 6 4 1
1 6 2 9
16
7
0
1813
1 9 6 9
1
8
7
4
1584
1587
1 1 8 1
1 0 7 1
1751
1 2 3 4
1
2
9
5
1372
1 6 9 1
1 4 5 2
2
0
8
6
1 8 3 6
1 3 0 8
1
8
6
5
2
0
1
0
1405
1878
1 8 4 6
1 8 2 4
1 4 7 2
1167
1125
1 2 3 8
1 2 0 2
1 1 7 4
1 0 6 4
1 7 6 9
1 6 4 0
1 2 0 7
1 3 7 9
1
3
0
9
1
0
8
0
1702
1 0 9 9
1 6 5 1
1290
1 7 8 8
1 8 3 2
2 1 6 1
1 3 6 2
1603
1 6 6 3
1 6 8 6
1246
1 6 9 5
1 7 9 0
1905
1194 1190
2 0 0 8
1 6 3 9
1335
1719
1661
1942
1 7 8 2
1307
1 1 6 3
1 3 8 9
1 2 3 6
1 2 0 6
1 5 1 5
1 7 7 4
1 7 8 1
1 2 2 7
1899
1 4 0 2
2019
1 9 6 3
1
8
6
9
1506
1 8 8 6
1804
1468
1374
1 9 5 4
1589
1
2
0
8
1742
1 8 8 4
1 8 8 5
1 4 3 9
1 9 4 9
1 4 3 7
1260
1 7 8 9
1
8
3
8
1 8 9 7
1
4
1
1
1 7 8 3
1
4
2
7
1 9 6 41
1
9
5
1 8 5 6
1 6 6 7
1 4 5 1
1718
1 7 1 0
1417
1807
1
5
3
1
1
0
6
8
1 9 5 0
1162
1 7 7 2
1 7 0 7
1 6 9 7
1525
1 3 8 5
1 0 9 1
1 8 6 4
1457
1 3 5 2
1 4 4 6
1 2 3 7
1408
1058
1501
1 7 8 7
1354
1634
1161
1 3 9 9
1
9
9
2
1306
1 7 6 4
2074
1285
1821
1315
1 7 0 9
1 4 0 7
1242
1349
1 8 9 1
1803
1 5 1 6
1909
1176
1 9 6 2
10951578
1
0
6
0
1880
1703
1 2 3 5
1 6 2 2
1818
1353
1 9 8 4
1 9 8 2
1 3 0 4
1455
1 6 3 3
1527
1 6 9 8
1 1 1 3
1 8 3 4
15 2 6
1
9
4
3
1 7 3 2
1 2 7 5
1 9 0 2
1397
1 7 0 8
1223
1 8 2 5
1717
1 8 1 0
1
4
2
6
1358
1593
1 4 6 7
1
8
7
5
1365
1 7 2 3
1 3 2 7
1441
1
0
4
1
1
8
7
0
1746
1738
1
6
3
2
1
0
4
0
1 4 8 7
1 4 9 8
1827
1425
1 2 2 4
1 4 0 3
1 6 9 3
11
46
1829
1 8 4 8
1
5
5
7
1
4
4
7
1286
1998
1 6 4 4
1994
1 4 0 6
1 8 1 9
1 7 1 3
1476
1 0 7 5
1 7 7 3
1 4 1 0
1398
1 6 4 7
1
2
1
2
1 5 1 4
1305
1042
105 3
1248
1057
1138
1 2 2 5
1338
1 1 1 6
1 8 2 6
1103
1820
1266
1 5 2 1
1 7 7 8
1310
1129
1 0 5 4
1 0 7 3
1 4 0 9
1101
1272
1987
1
7
3
4
1
3
9
1
1355
1097
1273
1 7 7 5
1806
1665
1303
17
05
1
0
1
0
1 7 9 3
1 4 7 5
1100
1454
1313
1
4
2
9
1 7 1 4
1
5
5
0
2 0 9 6
1490
1 6 4 5
1 6 4 8
1 0 9 8
1
1
5
7
1 3 1 7
1
8
8
2
1
9
5
7
1549
1 9 0 1
1 7 1 1
1148
1
3
1
9
1
9
9
9
1945
2
0
0
9
1 1 1 0
1 4 6 5
1 2 9 4
1
1
0
4
1871
1518
1 6 9 9
1 0 4 4
1696
1
4
2
8
1340
2
0
6
3
1
1
5
9
1120
1 3 7 1
1 2 9 3
Duwamish
Waterway
S a l m on
C
r
e
e
k
Black R i v e r
Duwamish River
D e s M o i n e s C r e e k
G r e e n R i ve r
ArborLake
LakeGarrett
DuwamishWaterway
White CenterHeightsPark Pond
Glen AcresGolf CoursePond
WestSeattleReservoir
ArrowLake
BurienLake
Tub Lake
AngleLake
LakeReba
Foster GolfCourse Pond
BowLake
DuwamishRiver
LoraLake
LakeWashington
PugetSound
SEATTLE-TACOMAINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
KING COUNTYINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
C
M
S
t
P
a
n
d
P
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
N
P Railroad
B
N
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
L
i
g
h
t
R
a
i
l
C M S P
a n d
P
R a i l r o
a d
S 1 3 2 n d S t
S 147th St
S 166th St
S 124th St
50th Pl S
6 2 n d A v e S
S 151st St
4 2 n d A v e S
S 164th St
S 133rd St
S 144th St
5 3 r d A v e S
5 8 t h A v e S
S 160th St
A n d o v e r
P a r k W
4 0 t h A v e S
6
5
t
h
A
v
e
S
S 112th St
S 115th St
S 129th St
Minkler Blvd
M a c a d a m
R
d
S
5 1 s t A v e S
Pavement Analysis
Legend
PCI
0 - 10 red
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60 yellow
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100 green
City Li mits
N00.5 10.25 Miles
IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2020 | Pavement Survey 2020
Label Legend
12341234 GISIDProject ID
(when ap plicable)
city of
W A S H I N G T O N
Tukwila , WA
- Year Post Rehab PCI:
by Segment
5 Annu al Budget$1,050,000
138
UV99
UV509
UV599
UV518
UV181
UV900
UV167
UV167
UV509
UV99
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
C
e
d
a
r
R
i
v
e
r
W
a
t
e
r
w
a
y
Duwamish
Waterway
Duwamish River
B l a c k R i v e r
D e s M o i n e s C r e e k
Gr e e n R i v e r
ArborLake
LakeGarrett
DuwamishWaterway
White CenterHeightsPark Pond
Glen AcresGolf CoursePond
WestSeattleReservoir
ArrowLake
BurienLake
Tub Lake
AngleLake
LakeReba
Foster GolfCourse Pond
BowLake
DuwamishRiver
LoraLake
LakeWashington
PugetSound
SEATTLE-TACOMAINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
KING COUNTYINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
RENTONMUNICIPALAIRPORT
C
M
S
t
P
a
n
d
P
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
N
P Railroad
B
N
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
S e a t t l e L i g h t R a i l
C M S P a n d P R a i l r o a d
S 1 3 2 n d S t
S 147th St
6
5
t
h
A
v
e
S
S 166th St
S 164th St
S 133rd St
S 124th St
50th Pl S
6 2 n d A v e S
5 3 r d A v e S
M
a
c
a
d
a
m
R
d
S
S 151st St
5 1 s t A v e S
S 144th St
4 2 n d A v e S
Minkler Blvd
A n d o v e r
P a r k W
S 115th St
S 160th St
4 0 t h A v e S
5 8 t h A v e S
S 112th St
S 129th St
134 6
1867
18
7
2
17 5 4
1
0
0
8
1 3 7 7
1562
1
9
5
5
10 0 1
2016
19 7 5
1604
1677
1484
1420
1601
17 5 01978
17 5 5
1392
2015 1187
1357
1 9 6 9
1587
1372
1 6 9 1
1167
1 7 9 0
1 7 7 4
1589
1
4
2
7
1880
1353
1593
1827
1 8 2 6
1129
1101
1 7 7 5
1
0
1
0
1454
1
8
8
2
1871
Pavement Analysis
Legend
Rehab Activity
Edge M ill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0)
FW M + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0)
FW M + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch
MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch
Rehab Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
City Limits
N00.5 10.25 Miles
IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2020 | Pavement Survey 2020
Label Legend
12341234 GISIDProject ID
(when ap plicable)
city of
W A S H I N G T O N
Tukwila , WA
by Rehab Year and Activity
5 - Year Rehab PlanAnnual Budget$1,050,000
139
UV99
UV509
UV599
UV518
UV181
UV900
UV167
UV167
UV509
UV99
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
Des M o i n e s C r e e k
Duwamish
Waterway
Duwamish River
B l a c k R i v e r
C
e
d
a
r
R
i
v
e
r
W
a
t
e
r
w
a
y
G r e e n R i v e r
ArborLake
LakeGarrett
DuwamishWaterway
White CenterHeightsPark Pond
Glen AcresGolf CoursePond
WestSeattleReservoir
ArrowLake
Tub Lake
AngleLake
LakeReba
Foster GolfCourse Pond
BowLake
DuwamishRiver
LoraLake
LakeWashington
PugetSound
SEATTLE-TACOMAINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
KING COUNTYINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
RENTONMUNICIPALAIRPORT
C
M
S
t
P
a
n
d
P
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
N
P Railroad
B
N
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
L
i
g
h
t
R
a
i
l
C M S P
a n d
P
R a i l r o a d
3560
1 4 0 0
2
5
8
0
3340
3660
2 8 4 0
4500
3460
2 1 20
2140
2
9
6
0
3860
4 8 0 0
2900
2 6 2 0
4240
4
7
8
0
3620
4 8 4 0
2740
3 2 0 0
4 2 2 0
3520
4 12 0
2880
4 7 4 0
1360
3940
4100
3
0
4
0
4 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 2 4 0
1960
4140
1700
1 9 8 0
35 4 0
1140
1580
3440
1 5 2 0
23 8 0 4420
1 1 6 0
1300
4020
4360
1500
2 4 4 0
3 5 8 0
3 2 6 0
1 7 2 0
2780
1 2 0 0
1 0 6 0
24 0 0
1220
1 6 6 0
4860
1 8 2 0
4
7
6
0
1 1 0 0
1880
4060
3800
4 0 4 0
3700
1 7 8 0
3 0 0 0
3880
4180
1320
4 4 4 0
4700
1 4 2 0
3680
4 0 8 0
3 9 6 0
3820
3
1
2
0
1600
4160
2060
4480
3 7 6 0
3 2 2 0
4540
4 6 8 0
1840
4280
1800
1760
1 6 8 0
2 0 2 0
2520
4520
3100
2 1 0 0
1080
2
6
4
0
3 5 0 0
4 6 0 0
2820
1480
4300
3 4 0 0
1 2 8 0
1
0
2
0
3 7 2 0
3420
1
1
8
0
4640
2320
1120
2660
4 8 2 0
2
6
0
0
3 3 8 0
1340
2 2 4 0
3 3 6 0
2
5
6
0
2
5
0
0
1 5 6 0
3180
1 0 4 0
2
9
4
0
2460
1 4 6 0
3920
1
7
4
0
3600
3780
1 8 6 0
2 2 8 0
3980
4000
2480
1
5
4
0
2
1
6
0
1 9 0 0
4400
2 0 4 0
13
8
0
3740
3240
2 0 8 0
2
7
6
0
1 9 4 0
2
9
2
0
2 1 8 0
4620
2340
3900
3280
4720
4320
2
3
6
0
4 5 8 0
1640
4260
3 3 0 0
3 6 4 0
4340
3020
2 2 6 0
4
9
0
0
1 2 6 0
3 1 6 0
1 4 4 0
2 9 8 0
2
5
4
0
1920
2 3 0 0
2
8
0
0
1 6 2 0
4 9 4 0
2860
4880
2700
4460
4
5
6
0
2
7
2
0
4380
3 1 4 0
4 9 2 0
S 147th St
M a c a d a m
R
d
S
S 164th St
S 166th St
S 133rd S t
S 124th St
6 2 n d A v e S
S 151st St
S 144th St
5 1 s t A v e S
S 1 3 2 n d S t
5 3 r d A v e S
4 2 n d A v e S
5 8 t h A v e S
Minkler Blvd
A n d o v e r
P a r k W
4 0 t h A v e S
6
5
t
h
A
v
e
S
50th Pl S
S 112th St
S 160th St
S 115th St
S 129th St
Pavement Analysis
Legend
City Li mits
N00.5 10.25 Miles
IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2020 | Pavement Survey 2020
Label Legend
12341234 GISIDProject ID
(when ap plicable)
Assembled Projectsby Project ID
city of
W A S H I N G T O N
Tukwila , WA
140
UV99
UV509
UV599
UV518
UV181
UV900
UV167
UV167
UV509
UV99
§¨¦405
§¨¦5
Des M o i n e s C r e e k
Duwamish
Waterway
Duwamish River
B l a c k R i v e r
C
e
d
a
r
R
i
v
e
r
W
a
t
e
r
w
a
y
G r e e n R i v e r
ArborLake
LakeGarrett
DuwamishWaterway
White CenterHeightsPark Pond
Glen AcresGolf CoursePond
WestSeattleReservoir
ArrowLake
Tub Lake
AngleLake
LakeReba
Foster GolfCourse Pond
BowLake
DuwamishRiver
LoraLake
LakeWashington
PugetSound
SEATTLE-TACOMAINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
KING COUNTYINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
RENTONMUNICIPALAIRPORT
C
M
S
t
P
a
n
d
P
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
N
P
Railroad
B
N
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
L
i
g
h
t
R
a
i
l
C M S P
a n d
P
R a i l r o a d
S 1 3 2 n d S t
S 147th St
M
a
c
a
d
a
m
R
d
S
E
a
s
t
M
a
r
g
i
n
a
l
W
a
y
S
S W G r a d y W a y
6
5
t
h
A
v
e
S
SouthcenterBlvd
S 166th St
S 164th St
S R y a n W a y
6
6
t
h
A
v
e
S
S 124th St
5
0th Pl S
6 2 n d A v e S
5 1 s t A v e S
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
A
v
e
S
5 3 r d A v e S
S 151st St
A n d o v e r P a r k W
S Ryan St
S 144th St
Tukwila Pkwy
A n d o v e r
P a r k
E
S 1 3 3 r d S t
S 180th St
A i r p o r t W a y S
6 1 s t A v e S
S o u t h c e n t e r P k w y
Strander Blvd
4 2 n d A v e S
Minkler Blvd
S 115th St
S 160th St
4 0 t h A v e S
5 8 t h A v e S
S 112th St
KlickitatDr
S 129th St
S 1 8 4 t h P l
Pavement Analysis
Legend
Col lector
Local
Minor Arterial
Princ ipal Arterial
City Li mits
N00.5 10.25 Miles
IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2020 | Pavement Survey 2020
Label Legend
12341234 GISIDProject ID
(when ap plicable)
city of
W A S H I N G T O N
Tukwila , WA
Functional Classificationby Segment
141
UV99
UV509
UV599
UV518
UV181
UV167
UV900
UV509
UV99 §¨¦405
§¨¦5
1 9 2 1
1 5 1 9
1 9 7 9
1671
1483
1 4 1 5
2035
1797
2084
13
9
5
2
0
8
9
1
0
0
9
1739
1
0
4
9
1544
1 3 6 1
2098
1 6 1 5
1 1 4 1
2039
1650
1 3 1 6
1189
1 0 7 9
1 8 6 1
1
3
6
4
17 5 3
1 1 5 8
2085
1
3
1
8
1 1 0 9
1 7 5 7
1404
1387
1 7 1 5
2078
1 9 4 8
1847
1
1
0
5
1 4 6 3
1559
1
1
9
8
20
9
9
1244
1106
1119
1759
1 0 0 4
1 9 1 4
1 6 1 8 1185
1 8 5 2
1 7 9 1
1 2 6 1
1 8 9 8
1262
1 2 5 6 1 4 1 3
1
0
9
0
1 0 8 3
1250
1442
1 2 3 2
2155
1 6 3 6
1432
151
7
2070
15 5 1
1 0 6 9
1 0 9 6
1 0 0 6
1 8 1 1
1546
1 7 6 7
1
9
1
8
1849
1 8 1 2
1179
1 4 4 8
1590
175 4
2 0 9 4
1
8
6
8
2043
1971
1 3 2 9
1664
1 9 7 6
1
2
7
4
1588
1 6 6 2
191 7
1 1 5 6
1122
1646
2079
1436
1013
1215
1061
2
0
5
1
1 0 7 6
1 9 4 7
2
0
6
4
1 0 7 8
1
5
7
7
1
8
4
5
2 1 6 2
1 2 0 1
1690
1 1 4 9
1493
1 8 3 1
1252
1830
1 4 8 2
1854
1089
1153
1 0 5 9
1 0 0 7
1 2 4 7
1 0 8 4
1 9 2 6
1
8
8
9
1 8 5 7
1638
1940
1271
1188
1 906
1 7 7 6
1444
1543
1 2 7 7
17 5 2
1 1 1 1
1 6 3 7
1370
17 4 9
2 1 0 0
1 3 7 7
1 8 2 8
1 0 6 7
1 0 7 7
1509
1562
1 5 6 6
1 9 8 3
11 55
1
8
8
7
1591
13 0 2
1360
1 0 4 8
1 1 7 8
1376
19931505
1 1 6 9
1
9
5
5
1888
2 0 0 5
1173
1431
1414
1 1 7 5
1494
1435
155318161991
2076
2071
1434
1990 1386
1858
1 3 2 8
1 5 0 7
20 9 3
1642
1 9 5 3
1 9 5 9
1 3 2 5
1565
1694
1280
1720
1 3 1 2
1744
1502
1 8 0 8
1 7 8 6
1
1
1
5
1910
1879
1522
1989
1 2 3 0
1 0 9 3
10 0 1
2 0 5 8
1 1 9 6
20 9 5
20
83
1 0 4 5
1635
1164
2097
13 8 1
1171
1 2 1 1
1
2
0
3
1 3 2 6
2016
1 6 5 3
1 0 5 1
19 7 5
1 3 8 3
1 9 7 0
1284
1 7 9 5
1 2 3 3
1 3 3 1
1123
1908
1145
1337
1219
1900
1469
1118
2002
1172
1 8 9 0
1 2 7 6
1 5 2 3
1604
2 0 1 3 1520
1214
1 9 4 4
1 8 4 2
1
8
8
3
1298
2
0
0
4
2
0
9
2
1621
1
8
8
1
1596
1108
1802
1366
1743
1 1 4 3
1 3 8 8
1677
1 5 6 8
1 7 9 2 1701
1 5 7 1
1 2 1 6
1
0
6
6
1486
15
8
2
1
2
1
0
2 0 6 2
1394
1599
1 9 5 1
19 7 7
1300
1 6 1 6 1555
1 3 3 0
1440
1 1 7 0
1484
1 5 7 0
1186
1 2 5 4
1229
1
9
4
6
1 1 9 9
1958
1011
1748
1
4
3
8
1245
1102
1
4
2
4
1 6 7 2
1988
2003
2 0 1 1
1801
1907
1 0 7 2
1124
1420
1556
1 8 6 0
1291
1 9 6 1
1
1
6
0
1002
2 1 6 3
1 1 6 6
1600
1003
1 4 7 4
2031
1 7 6 8
1 8 5 9
1 5 3 0
1 6 2 8
1798
16051601
2025
17 5 0
1127
1542
1
9
7
2
19 7 8
1758
1491
1 5 6 9
1121
1 7 7 0
1
5
2
8
1850
1996
1 1 5 4
1 9 1 9
1489
11911678
1
6
8
7
17 5 5
1347
1375
1373
1 8 2 3
1 6 6 6
2023
1336
1903
1676
1585
1 7 3 6
2022
1
3
3
2
1 0 9 4
1512
1 0 6 5
1243
1 8 3 5
1679
1 9 8 0
1
1
8
0
1150
1 7 3 3
1 0 4 6
1192
1602
1737
1193
1249
1251
1197
1342
1805
1 9 1 3
1279
1 1 0 7
1 0 8 2
1 4 4 9
1 7 3 0
1510
1529
1348
2
1
3
3
1995
1 0 6 3
1 7 1 2
1416
1278
1039
2 0 2 1
1839
1213
1 2 0 9
186 2
1 8 5 5
1263
1 7 4 1
1 1 1 7
1 8 5 1
1 2 0 0
2102
1392
19 7 3
1 1 4 0
2015
1218
1 8 0 9
1 0 7 0
1055
1
1
6
5
1 1 4 2
1 2 0 4
1 2 4 0
1 5 7 2
1 1 1 2
1 8 6 6
1
9
9
7
1350
1893
1222
1 3 2 3
1369
1
4
9
5
1 5 6 7
1
3
1
4
1345
1716
1 7 9 6
1485 1598
1187
1 3 4 3
1384
1492
2073
1128
1643
1
1
1
4
1
2
9
2
1 1 6 8
1508
1547
1 9 5 2
1
3
7
8
1873
1056
1226
1 8 4 0
1560
1 2 0 5
1357
1 6 4 1
1 6 2 9
16
7
0
1813
1 9 6 9
1
8
7
4
1584
1587
1 1 8 1
1 0 7 1
1
7
5
1
1 2 3 4
1
2
9
5
1372
1 6 9 1
1 4 5 2
2
0
8
6
1 8 3 6
1 3 0 8
1
8
6
5
2
0
1
0
1405
1878
1 8 4 6
1 8 2 4
1 4 7 2
1167
1125
1 2 3 8
1 2 0 2
1 1 7 4
1 0 6 4
1 7 6 9
1 6 4 0
1 2 0 7
1 3 7 9
1
3
0
9
1
0
8
0
1702
1 0 9 9
1 6 5 1
1290
1 7 8 8
1 8 3 2
2 1 6 1
1 3 6 2
1603
1 6 6 3
1 6 8 6
1246
1 6 9 5
1 7 9 0
1905
1194 1190
2 0 0 8
1 6 3 9
1335
1719
1661
1942
1 7 8 2
1307
1 1 6 3
1 3 8 9
1 2 3 6
1 2 0 6
1 5 1 5
1 7 7 4
1 7 8 1
1 2 2 7
1899
1 4 0 2
2019
1 9 6 3
1
8
6
9
1506
1 8 8 6
1804
1468
1374
1 9 5 4
1589
1
2
0
8
1742
1 8 8 4
1 8 8 5
1 4 3 9
1 9 4 9
1 4 3 7
1260
1 7 8 9
1
8
3
8
1 8 9 7
1
4
1
1
1 7 8 3
1
4
2
7
1 9 6 41
1
9
5
1 8 5 6
1 6 6 7
1 4 5 1
1718
1 7 1 0
1417
1807
1
5
3
1
1
0
6
8
1 9 5 0
1162
1 7 7 2
1 7 0 7
1 6 9 7
1525
1 3 8 5
1 0 9 1
1 8 6 4
1457
1 3 5 2
1 4 4 6
1 2 3 7
1408
1058
1501
1 7 8 7
1354
1634
1161
1 3 9 9
1
9
9
2
1306
1 7 6 4
2074
1285
1821
1315
1 7 0 9
1 4 0 7
1242
1349
1 8 9 1
1803
1 5 1 6
1909
1176
1 9 6 2
10951578
1
0
6
0
1880
1703
1 2 3 5
1 6 2 2
1818
1353
1 9 8 4
1 9 8 2
1 3 0 4
1455
1 6 3 3
1527
1 6 9 8
1 1 1 3
1 8 3 4
15 2 6
1
9
4
3
1 7 3 2
1 2 7 5
1 9 0 2
1397
1 7 0 8
1223
1 8 2 5
1717
1 8 1 0
1
4
2
6
1358
1593
1 4 6 7
1
8
7
5
1365
1 7 2 3
1 3 2 7
1441
1
0
4
1
1
8
7
0
1746
1738
1
6
3
2
1
0
4
0
1 4 8 7
1 4 9 8
1827
1425
1 2 2 4
1 4 0 3
1 6 9 3
11
46
1829
1 8 4 8
1
5
5
7
1
4
4
7
1286
1998
1 6 4 4
1994
1 4 0 6
1 8 1 9
1 7 1 3
1476
1 0 7 5
1 7 7 3
1 4 1 0
1398
1 6 4 7
1
2
1
2
1 5 1 4
1305
1042
105 3
1248
1057
1138
1 2 2 5
1338
1 1 1 6
1 8 2 6
1103
182 0
1266
1 5 2 1
1 7 7 8
1310
1129
1 0 5 4
1 0 7 3
1 4 0 9
1101
1272
1987
1
7
3
4
1
3
9
1
1355
1097
1273
1 7 7 5
1806
1665
1303
17
05
1
0
1
0
1 7 9 3
1 4 7 5
1100
1454
1313
1
4
2
9
1 7 1 4
1
5
5
0
2 0 9 6
1490
1 6 4 5
1 6 4 8
1 0 9 8
1
1
5
7
1 3 1 7
1
8
8
2
1
9
5
7
1549
1 9 0 1
1 7 1 1
1148
1
3
1
9
1
9
9
9
1945
2
0
0
9
1 1 1 0
1 4 6 5
1 2 9 4
1
1
0
4
1871
1518
1 6 9 9
1 0 4 4
1696
1
4
2
8
1340
2
0
6
3
1
1
5
9
1120
1 3 7 1
1 2 9 3
Des M o i n e s C r e e k
Duwamish
Waterway
B l a c k River
S a l m o n C r e e k
Duwamish River
G r e e n R i v e r
ArborLake
LakeGarrett
DuwamishWaterway
White CenterHeightsPark Pond
Glen AcresGolf CoursePond
WestSeattleReservoir
ArrowLake
BurienLake
Tub Lake
AngleLake
LakeReba
Foster GolfCourse Pond
BowLake
DuwamishRiver
LoraLake
LakeWashington
PugetSound
SEATTLE-TACOMAINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
KING COUNTYINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
C
M
S
t
P
a
n
d
P
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
N
P
Railroad
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
L
i
g
h
t
R
a
i
l
B
N
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
C M S P
a n d
P
R a i l r o a d
S 1 3 2 n d S t
S 147th St
S 166th St
S 124th St
50th Pl S
6 2 n d A v e S
S 151st St
4 2 n d A v e S
S 164th St
S 133rd St
S 144th St
5 3 r d A v e S
5 8 t h A v e S
S 160th St
A n d o v e r
P a r k W
4 0 t h A v e S
6
5
t
h
A
v
e
S
S 112th St
S 115th St
S 129th St
Minkler Blvd
M a c a d a m
R
d
S
5 1 s t A v e S
Pavement Analysis
Legend
Condition Rating (Descriptive GFP)
0 - 25 Very Poor
26 - 40 Poor
41 - 50 Marginal
51 - 60 Fair
61 - 70 Good
71 - 85 Very Good
86 - 100 Excellent
City Li mits
N00.5 10.25 Miles
IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2020 | Pavement Survey 2020
Label Legend
12341234 GISIDProject ID
(when ap plicable)
city of
W A S H I N G T O N
Tukwila , WA
Pavement Condition (Descriptive GFP)by Segment
142
UV99
UV509
UV599
UV518
UV181
UV900
UV167
UV509
UV99 §¨¦405
§¨¦5
1 9 2 1
1 5 1 9
1 9 7 9
1671
1483
1 4 1 5
2035
1797
2084
13
9
5
2
0
8
9
1
0
0
9
1739
1
0
4
9
1544
1 3 6 1
2098
1 6 1 5
1 1 4 1
2039
1650
1 3 1 6
1189
1 0 7 9
1 8 6 1
1
3
6
4
17 5 3
1 1 5 8
2085
1
3
1
8
1 1 0 9
1 7 5 7
1404
1387
1 7 1 5
2078
1 9 4 8
1847
1
1
0
5
1 4 6 3
1559
1
1
9
8
20
9
9
1244
1106
1119
1759
1 9 1 4
1 6 1 8 1185
1 8 5 2
1 7 9 1
1 2 6 1
1 8 9 8
1262
1 2 5 6 1 4 1 3
1
0
9
0
1 0 8 3
1250
1442
1 2 3 2
2155
1 6 3 6
1432
151
7
2070
15 5 1
1 0 6 9
1 0 9 6
1 0 0 6
1 8 1 1
1546
1 7 6 7
1
9
1
8
1849
1 8 1 2
1179
1 4 4 8
1590
175 4
2 0 9 4
1
8
6
8
2043
1971
1 3 2 9
1664
1
2
7
4
1588
1 6 6 2
191 7
1 1 5 6
1122
1646
2079
1436
1013
1215
1061
2
0
5
1
1 0 7 6
1 9 4 7
2
0
6
4
1 0 7 8
1
5
7
7
1
8
4
5
2 1 6 2
1 2 0 1
1690
1 1 4 9
1493
1 8 3 1
1252
1830
1 4 8 2
1089
1153
1 0 5 9
1 0 0 7
1 2 4 7
1 0 8 4
1 9 2 6
1
8
8
9
1 8 5 7
1638
1940
1271
1188
1 906
1 7 7 6
1444
1543
1 2 7 7
1 1 1 1
1 6 3 7
1370
17 4 9
2 1 0 0
1 3 7 7
1 8 2 8
1 0 6 7
1 0 7 7
1509
1562
1 5 6 6
1 9 8 3
11 55
1
8
8
7
1591
13 0 2
1360
1 0 4 8
1 1 7 8
1376
19931505
1 1 6 9
1
9
5
5
1888
2 0 0 5
1173
1431
1414
1 1 7 5
1494
1435
155318161991
2076
2071
1434
1990 1386
1858
1 3 2 8
1 5 0 7
20 9 3
1642
1 9 5 3
1 9 5 9
1 3 2 5
1565
1694
1280
1720
1 3 1 2
1744
1502
1 8 0 8
1 7 8 6
1
1
1
5
1910
1879
1522
1989
1 2 3 0
1 0 9 3
10 0 1
2 0 5 8
1 1 9 6
20 9 5
2083
1 0 4 5
1635
1164
2097
13 8 1
1171
1 2 1 1
1
2
0
3
1 3 2 6
2016
1 6 5 3
1 0 5 1
19 7 5
1 3 8 3
1 9 7 0
1284
1 7 9 5
1 2 3 3
1 3 3 1
1123
1908
1145
1337
1219
1900
1469
1118
2002
1172
1 8 9 0
1 2 7 6
1 5 2 3
1604
2 0 1 3 1520
1214
1 9 4 4
1 8 4 2
1
8
8
3
1298
2
0
0
4
2
0
9
2
1621
1
8
8
1
1596
1108
1802
1366
1743
1 1 4 3
1 3 8 8
1677
1 5 6 8
1 7 9 2 1701
1 5 7 1
1 2 1 6
1
0
6
6
1486
15
8
2
1
2
1
0
2 0 6 2
1394
1599
1 9 5 1
19 7 7
1300
1 6 1 6 1555
1 3 3 0
1440
1 1 7 0
1484
1 5 7 0
1186
1 2 5 4
1229
1
9
4
6
1 1 9 9
1958
1011
1748
1
4
3
8
1245
1102
1
4
2
4
1 6 7 2
1988
2003
2 0 1 1
1801
1907
1 0 7 2
1124
1420
1556
1 8 6 0
1291
1 9 6 1
1
1
6
0
1002
2 1 6 3
1 1 6 6
1600
1003
1 4 7 4
2031
1 7 6 8
1 8 5 9
1 5 3 0
1 6 2 8
1798
16051601
2025
17 5 0
1127
1542
1
9
7
2
19 7 8
1758
1491
1 5 6 9
1121
1 7 7 0
1
5
2
8
1850
1996
1 1 5 4
1 9 1 9
1489
11911678
1
6
8
7
17 5 5
1347
1375
1373
1 8 2 3
1 6 6 6
2023
1336
1903
1676
1585
1 7 3 6
2022
1
3
3
2
1 0 9 4
1512
1 0 6 5
1243
1 8 3 5
1679
1 9 8 0
1
1
8
0
1150
1 7 3 3
1 0 4 6
1192
1602
1737
1193
1249
1251
1197
1342
1805
1 9 1 3
1279
1 1 0 7
1 0 8 2
1 4 4 9
1 7 3 0
1510
1529
1348
2
1
3
3
1995
1 0 6 3
1 7 1 2
1416
1278
1039
2 0 2 1
1839
1213
1 2 0 9
186 2
1 8 5 5
1263
1 7 4 1
1 1 1 7
1 8 5 1
1 2 0 0
2102
1392
19 7 3
1 1 4 0
2015
1218
1 8 0 9
1 0 7 0
1055
1
1
6
5
1 1 4 2
1 2 0 4
1 2 4 0
1 5 7 2
1 1 1 2
1 8 6 6
1
9
9
7
1350
1893
1222
1 3 2 3
1369
1
4
9
5
1 5 6 7
1
3
1
4
1345
1716
1 7 9 6
1485 1598
1187
1 3 4 3
1384
1492
2073
1128
1643
1
1
1
4
1
2
9
2
1 1 6 8
1508
1547
1 9 5 2
1
3
7
8
1873
1056
1226
1 8 4 0
1560
1 2 0 5
1357
1 6 4 1
1 6 2 9
16
7
0
1813
1 9 6 9
1
8
7
4
1584
1587
1 1 8 1
1 0 7 1
1751
1 2 3 4
1
2
9
5
1372
1 6 9 1
1 4 5 2
2
0
8
6
1 8 3 6
1 3 0 8
1
8
6
5
2
0
1
0
1405
1878
1 8 4 6
1 8 2 4
1 4 7 2
1167
1125
1 2 3 8
1 2 0 2
1 1 7 4
1 0 6 4
1 7 6 9
1 6 4 0
1 2 0 7
1 3 7 9
1
3
0
9
1
0
8
0
1702
1 0 9 9
1 6 5 1
1290
1 7 8 8
1 8 3 2
2 1 6 1
1 3 6 2
1603
1 6 6 3
1 6 8 6
1246
1 6 9 5
1 7 9 0
1905
1194 1190
2 0 0 8
1 6 3 9
1335
1719
1661
1942
1 7 8 2
1307
1 1 6 3
1 3 8 9
1 2 3 6
1 2 0 6
1 5 1 5
1 7 7 4
1 7 8 1
1 2 2 7
1899
1 4 0 2
2019
1 9 6 3
1
8
6
9
1506
1 8 8 6
1804
1468
1374
1 9 5 4
1589
1
2
0
8
1742
1 8 8 4
1 8 8 5
1 4 3 9
1 9 4 9
1 4 3 7
1260
1 7 8 9
1
8
3
8
1 8 9 7
1
4
1
1
1 7 8 3
1
4
2
7
1 9 6 41
1
9
5
1 8 5 6
1 6 6 7
1 4 5 1
1718
1 7 1 0
1417
1807
1
5
3
1
1
0
6
8
1 9 5 0
1162
1 7 7 2
1 7 0 7
1 6 9 7
1525
1 3 8 5
1 0 9 1
1 8 6 4
1457
1 3 5 2
1 4 4 6
1 2 3 7
1408
1058
1501
1 7 8 7
1354
1634
1161
1 3 9 9
1
9
9
2
1306
1 7 6 4
2074
1285
1821
1315
1 7 0 9
1 4 0 7
1242
1349
1 8 9 1
1803
1 5 1 6
1909
1176
1 9 6 2
10951578
1
0
6
0
1880
1703
1 2 3 5
1 6 2 2
1818
1353
1 9 8 4
1 9 8 2
1 3 0 4
1455
1 6 3 3
1527
1 6 9 8
1 1 1 3
1 8 3 4
15 2 6
1
9
4
3
1 7 3 2
1 2 7 5
1 9 0 2
1397
1 7 0 8
1223
1 8 2 5
1717
1 8 1 0
1
4
2
6
1358
1593
1 4 6 7
1
8
7
5
1365
1 7 2 3
1 3 2 7
1441
1
0
4
1
1
8
7
0
1746
1738
1
6
3
2
1
0
4
0
1 4 8 7
1 4 9 8
1827
1425
1 2 2 4
1 4 0 3
1 6 9 3
11
46
1829
1 8 4 8
1
5
5
7
1
4
4
7
1286
1998
1 6 4 4
1994
1 4 0 6
1 8 1 9
1 7 1 3
1476
1 0 7 5
1 7 7 3
1 4 1 0
1398
1 6 4 7
1
2
1
2
1 5 1 4
1305
1042
105 3
1248
1057
1138
1 2 2 5
1338
1 1 1 6
1 8 2 6
1103
182 0
1266
1 5 2 1
1 7 7 8
1310
1129
1 0 5 4
1 0 7 3
1 4 0 9
1101
1272
1987
1
7
3
4
1
3
9
1
1355
1097
1273
1 7 7 5
1806
1665
1303
17
05
1
0
1
0
1 7 9 3
1 4 7 5
1100
1454
1313
1
4
2
9
1 7 1 4
1
5
5
0
2 0 9 6
1490
1 6 4 5
1 6 4 8
1 0 9 8
1
1
5
7
1 3 1 7
1
8
8
2
1
9
5
7
1549
1 9 0 1
1 7 1 1
1148
1
3
1
9
1
9
9
9
1945
2
0
0
9
1 1 1 0
1 4 6 5
1 2 9 4
1
1
0
4
1871
1518
1 6 9 9
1 0 4 4
1696
1
4
2
8
1340
2
0
6
3
1
1
5
9
1120
1 3 7 1
1 2 9 3
Des M o i n e s C r e e k
Duwamish
Waterway
S a lm
o
n
C
r
e
e
k
B lac k Ri ver
Duwamish River
Gr e e n R i v e r
ArborLake
LakeGarrett
DuwamishWaterway
White CenterHeightsPark Pond
Glen AcresGolf CoursePond
WestSeattleReservoir
ArrowLake
BurienLake
Tub Lake
AngleLake
LakeReba
Foster GolfCourse Pond
BowLake
DuwamishRiver
LoraLake
LakeWashington
PugetSound
SEATTLE-TACOMAINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
KING COUNTYINTERNATIONALAIRPORT
C
M
S
t
P
a
n
d
P
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
N
P
Railroad
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
L
i
g
h
t
R
a
i
l
B
N
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
C M S P
a n d
P
R a i l r o a d
S 1 3 2 n d S t
S 147th St
S 166th St
S 124th St
50th Pl S
6 2 n d A v e S
S 151st St
4 2 n d A v e S
S 164th St
S 133rd St
S 144th St
5 3 r d A v e S
5 8 t h A v e S
S 160th St
A n d o v e r
P a r k W
4 0 t h A v e S
6
5
t
h
A
v
e
S
S 112th St
S 115th St
S 129th St
Minkler Blvd
M a c a d a m
R
d
S
5 1 s t A v e S
Pavement Analysis
Legend
PCI
0 - 10 red
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60 yellow
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100 green
City Li mits
N00.5 10.25 Miles
IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2020 | Pavement Survey 2020
Label Legend
12341234 GISIDProject ID
(when ap plicable)
city of
W A S H I N G T O N
Tukwila , WA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI)Current PCI by Segment
143
144
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2020 Agenda Items/TIC 10-05-2020/06. PW Water Sewer & SWM 2021 Rates/Info Memo 2021 2022 Water Sewer SWM Rates
09012020.docx
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
To: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
From: Hari Ponnekanti, Interim Public Works Director
By: Gail Labanara, Public Works Analyst
CC: Mayor Ekberg
Date: October 2, 2020
Subject: Public Works Fee Resolution for Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Rates
ISSUE
Adopt Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution for 2021 and 2022.
BACKGROUND
Utility fees provide the bulk of the revenue that support s the operations of the water, sewer, and
surface water operations in the City of Tukwila. The City’s Budget, Capital Improvement Program
and Comprehensive Plan all reference or include the policies that govern rate development. Here
are a few examples of the City’s policies, as taken from the Capital Facilities Element (Chapter 14)
of the Comprehensive Plan:
• Utility rates and charges shall be structured to ensure adequate infrastructure development,
in addition to compliance with operation, maintenance, and federal and State requirements
• Rate increases shall be small, applied frequently, and staggered to avoid an overly
burdensome increase and undue impact in any given year
• Each enterprise fund shall be reviewed at least biennially, and shall have a rate structure
adequate to meet its operations and maintenance and long-term capital requirements
• Rate increases of external agencies (i.e., King County secondary wastewater treatment
fees) shall be passed through to the users of the utility
Annual rate increases allow the City to keep pace with inflation and fixed cost increases, and to
implement the City’s long-term strategic goals for maintenance, improvement, and replacement of
capital infrastructure. Without regularly occurring and sufficient rate increases, the City’s ability to
address infrastructure needs would be compromised. In addition, the policies reinforce the
importance of maintaining adequate fund reserve levels.
The City has adopted Comprehensive Plans for Water, Sewer and Surface Water that analyze
each fund for revenue requirements and prioritize capital improvement projects. The City is
currently updating the Water and Sewer Comprehensive Plans and Surface Water is scheduled to
begin in 2021. Council adopts the comprehensive plans approximately every six years and those
adopted plans inform rate studies. Rate recommendations are informed not only through identifying
needed capital projects but by examining trends in charges from suppliers, consumption patterns,
and regulatory and operating needs. Recommended rates are the product of a complex set of
intertwined inputs, some of which are fixed and outside of the City’s control. Setting a rate higher or
lower than what is suggested through the fund modeling, could mean that the assumptions or
inputs may also need to change.
145
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Water, Sewer, and SWM Rates
Page 2
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2020 Agenda Items/TIC 10 -05-2020/06. PW Water Sewer & SWM 2021 Rates/Info Memo 2021 2022 Water Sewer SWM Rates
09012020.docx
The Capital Improvement Program, which is one factor in establishing rate recommendations, is
also used to advantageously position the City for grants. A thorough list of capital projects is
needed, as granting agencies require that all projects must be listed in the City’s adopted Capital
Improvement Program in order to be eligible for grants. Grant funding for water and sewer are
normally rare and difficult to obtain, but the City has been very successful in obtaining grants for
Surface Water projects.
The City’s current and proposed utility fees compare well in the region. All the comparisons show
the City’s proposed rate increases for 2021 and 2022, and the City still ranks in the mid-range,
without showing the corresponding increases that will occur in the other cities. The magnitudes of
the proposed rate increases are also reasonable; as smaller rate increases more frequently helps
the City avoid needing to implement more significant, catch-up increases in the future.
WATER
Public Works analyzed the operational and capital needs of the Water Enterprise Fund in
determining the proposed fees. In addition, the City needs to account for Cascade Water Alliance’s
(CWA) wholesale water rates that are set to increase by 2.2% in 2021 and 2.2% in 2022 (Exhibit
A). A rate increase is being proposed to the base rates on residential, multi-family and commercial/
industrial customers as well as increases to water consumption fees. Fire Protection service
charges are flat fees every month and will be increased in 2022.
Exhibit B is a rate matrix of all proposed utility rate increases for residential customers. Exhibit D-1
shows a comparison of adjoining cities and their water rates along with the Water Model from the
Proposed 2021-2026 CIP. Exhibit E is the Resolution that updates the Public Works Fee Schedule
for 2021 and 2022.
Tukwila water rates currently rank No. 13 and as rates will increase across the board, the estimate
is that Tukwila will continue to be competitive as our neighboring cities. Even with the proposed
water rate increases over the next six years as shown in the Water model, the water fund shows a
drawdown each year and does not meet the 20% reserve policy in 202 5 and 2026.
TABLE 1 - WATER RATES PROPOSED FOR 2021 and 2022
CATEGORY
Current 2020
Charges
Proposed 2021
Charges
Proposed 2022
Charges
Single Family $19.00 No change $20.00
Multi-Family (each condo,
apt, or dwelling unit) $19.00 No change $20.00
Commercial/Industrial Base
Charges
$49.00 to
$661.00
$50.00 &
$674.00
$52.00 &
$708.00
Single Family Consumption
Charges per 1 CCF $2.80 & $3.90 $2.86 & $3.98 $3.00 & $4.18
Multi-Family Consumption
Charges per 1 CCF $3.40 & $4.70 $3.46 & $4.78 $3.62 & $5.02
Commercial/Industrial
Consumption per 1 CCF $5.10 & $6.90 $5.20 & $7.04 $5.44 & $7.38
Fire Protection Service
Charges
$10.00 to
$287.00
No change $10.50 to
$300.00
146
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Water, Sewer, and SWM Rates
Page 3
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2020 Agenda Items/TIC 10 -05-2020/06. PW Water Sewer & SWM 2021 Rates/Info Memo 2021 2022 Water Sewer SWM Rates
09012020.docx
SEWER
King County Ordinance No. 19106 adopted a 4.5% rate increase in the King County sewage
disposal fees for 2021. The King County sewer rate will increase from $45.33 to $47.37 per
residential customer equivalent per month in 2021. The is no rate change proposed by King
County in 2022. Exhibit C is King County Ordinance No. 19106 for the 2021 and 2022 rates.
Tukwila’s sewer base rate will not have an increase in 2021 or 2022 in accordance with the rate
model that analyzes the City’s operational and capital needs. The City’s sewer rate will remain
$30.00 per residential connection and $55.36 for up to 750 cubic feet or fraction thereof for
commercial/industrial customers. Exhibit D-2 shows a comparison of adjoining cities and their
residential sewer rates, along with the Sewer Model from the Proposed 2021-2026 CIP.
SURFACE WATER
Tukwila’s surface water base rate is scheduled for an increase in 2021 and 2022. The City’s
surface water rate will increase from $190.00 to $194.00 in 2021 and from $194.00 to $204.00 in
2022 per residential parcel, per year. Commercial rates will range from $234.12 to $1,956.86 per
4,356 square foot for all other parcels in 2021 and $245.82 to $2,054.70 in 2022.
Exhibit D-3 shows a comparison of surface water fees with other cities in the region along with the
Surface Water Model from the Proposed 2021-2026 CIP. The City’s proposed residential rates for
2021 and 2022 are below the 2020 average rate of $237.60.
The proposed surface water fees are estimated to generate an additional $137,000 in revenue in
2021 and $350,000 in 2022. If Council were not to adopt the proposed rate increases, the City
would either have to eliminate surface water capital projects or staff allocation or take funds from
reserves. Doing so would mean that the City would fall behind on its infrastructure needs or would
need to increase the rate more substantially in subsequent years.
Surface water fees are processed by King County and collected with property taxes.
TABLE 2 – SURFACE WATER RATES PROPOSED FOR 2021 and 2022
CATEGORY
Current 2020
SWM Rate
Proposed 2021
SWM Rate
Proposed 2022
SWM Rate
Residential Flat rate of $190.00 Flat rate of $194.00 Flat rate of $204.00
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to adopt the City’s 2021 and 2022 water, sewer, and surface water proposed
rate increases in accordance with the Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution (Exhibit E) and consider
this item at the October 12, 2020 Committee of the Whole and subsequent October 19, 2020 Consent
Agenda Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Exhibit A Cascade Water Alliance Summary of Forecasted Member Payments
Exhibit B Rate Matrix
Exhibit C King County Ordinance No. 19106 for 2021
Exhibit D-1 through D-3 Comparison of Utility Rates with Adjoining Cities with 2012 CIP Models
Exhibit E Public Works Fee Schedule Draft Resolution
147
CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-11A
2.2%/2.2%
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF D IRECTORS OF THE C ASCADE WATER
ALLIANCE, A WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ADOPTING RAT ES AND
CHARGES FOR THE YEAR 2021 AND 2022
WHEREAS , the Cascade Water Alliance (“Cascade”) is a Washington municipal
corporation formed under authority of the Joint Municipal Utilities Authority Act (Chapter 39.106
RCW) to provide water supply to its Members; and
WHEREAS, the Joint Municipal Utility Services Agreement provides for the payment of
Administrative Dues by Cascade Members; and
WHEREAS, the Joint Municipal Utility Services Agreement provides for the Board of
Directors (the Board) to set Rates and Charges according to the rate calculation methodology,
which includes a calculation of demand shares and a uniform pricing structure with a commodity
charge and fixed charges allocated by demand share; that the Board may adopt wholesale
charges in addition to normal demand share charges to encourage resource conservation; and
that the Board must set Rates and Charges at levels sufficient for all expenses of Cascade; and
WHEREAS, the Board adopted a Rate Calculation Methodology, codified at Chapter
5.20 of the Cascade Water Alliance Code; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution 2010-08, the Board established a two-year fiscal biennium
budget that will consist of the adopted two consecutive annual budgets, which together shall be
referred to as “the biennial budget.” By Resolution 2018-13, t he Board further established that
Member Charges for both years will be approved biennially when the biennial budget is
adopted.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE as follows:
Section 1. Cascade Equivalent Residential Units (CERUs) for 2021 and 2022.
CERUs for each Member for 2021 and 2022 are as follows:
TABLE 1
Member 2021 Adopted CERUs 2022 Adopted CERUs
Bellevue 69,144.5 69,344.5
Issaquah 15,384.0 15,544.0
Kirkland 20,204.5 20,364.5
Redmond 33,083.5 33,273.5
Sammamish Plateau Water 24,301.5 24,571.5
Skyway WSD 3,889.5 3,894.5
Tukwila 8,397.5 8,412.5
Total 174,405.0 175,405.0
Exhibit A
148
Section 2. 2021 and 2022 Demand Shares.
Adopted demand shares for each Member for 2021 and 2022 are as follows:
TABLE 2
Member
2021
Demand
Shares
2021 Demand Share
percentage
2022
Demand
Shares
2022
Demand
Share
percentage
Bellevue 19.9611 52.61% 19.5130 52.63%
Issaquah 1.7011 4.48% 1.6488 4.45%
Kirkland 5.2625 13.87% 5.1940 14.01%
Redmond 6.7629 17.83% 6.5728 17.73%
Sammamish Plateau Water 1.3623 3.59% 1.2917 3.48%
Skyway WSD 0.4087 1.08% 0.4038 1.09%
Tukwila 2.4803 6.54% 2.4545 6.62%
Total 37.9388 100.00% 37.0786 100.00%
Except that, in accordance with the Interlocal Contract, no Member shall have a Weighted Vote
of less than one.
Section 3. Summary of Member Charges.
2021 and 2022 Adopted Member Charges (excluding RCFC) are hereby established as
shown in Table 3 below.
Administrative dues shall be assessed against each Member for the years 2021 and 2022 at the
rates of $19.48 and $21.45 per CERU respectively multiplied by 100% of that Member’s CERUs.
The demand share charge for the years 2021 and 2022 shall be $385,347 and $391,065
respectively per Demand Share percentage.
The conservation program charge for the years 2021 and 2022 shall be $4.25 and $4.27
respectively per CERU. The charge is applicable to 100% of a Member’s CERUs.
TABLE 3
2021 Member Charges Administr
ative Dues
Conservation
Charges
Demand
Share
Charges
2020 True-
up Total
Bellevue $1,342,900 $292,651 $20,274,573 $93,287 $22,003,411
Issaquah $297,008 $64,726 $1,727,838 ($114,822) $1,974,750
Kirkland $390,929 $85,193 $5,345,177 ($95,149) $5,726,150
Redmond $643,418 $140,217 $6,869,076 $10,926 $7,663,637
Sammamish Plateau Water $469,195 $102,249 $1,383,668 $148,561 $2,103,673
Skyway WSD $75,684 $16,493 $415,150 ($4,807) $502,520
Tukwila $163,322 $35,592 $2,519,224 ($37,998) $2,680,140
Total $3,382,456 $737,121 $38,534,706 ($2) $42,654,281
149
2022 Member Charges Administrative
Dues
Conservation
Charges
Demand Share
Charges Total
Bellevue $1,483,288 $295,312 $20,580,180 $22,358,780
Issaquah $330,018 $65,704 $1,738,960 $2,134,682
Kirkland $433,427 $86,292 $5,478,039 $5,997,758
Redmond $709,707 $141,298 $6,932,311 $7,783,316
Sammamish Plateau Water $521,316 $103,790 $1,362,345 $1,987,451
Skyway WSD $83,438 $16,612 $425,914 $525,964
Tukwila $180,143 $35,865 $2,588,718 $2,804,726
Total $3,741,337 $744,873 $39,106,467 $43,592,677
Section 4. Effect.
This Resolution shall be in full force and effect on the date of its adoption.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the Board of Directors of the Cascade Water Alliance at
a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23rd day of September 2020.
CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE
John Stokes , Chair
Attest – Ray Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer Penny Sweet, Vice Chair
Angela Birney, Secretary/Treasurer
Include in CWAC?
Yes
No
Members
Yes ______
No ______
Demand Share
Yes ______%
No ______ %
150
Ci
t
y
o
f
T
u
k
w
i
l
a
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
R
a
t
e
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
W
i
t
h
1
0
%
C
i
t
y
I
nt
e
r
f
u
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
F
e
e
s
f
o
r
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
W
A
T
E
R
R
A
T
E
S
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
20
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
2
0
2
4
2
0
2
5
2
0
2
6
T
o
t
a
l
+1
5
%
+
1
0
%
+
1
0
%
+
1
0
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
0
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
0
%
+2%
+
5
%
+
6
%
+
5
%
+
6
%
+
6
%
+1.0%
+
2
.
5
%
+
3
.
0
%
+
2
.
5
%
+
3
.
0
%
+
3
.
0
%
C
W
A
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
P
a
s
s
-
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
$3
.
9
0
t
o
$
3
.
9
4
$
3
.
9
8
t
o
$
4
.
0
8
$
4
.
1
8
t
o
$
4
.
3
0
$
4
.
4
2
t
o
$
4
.
5
2
$
4
.
6
2
t
o $4.76
$
4
.
9
0
t
o
$
5
.
0
4
(
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
m
o
n
t
h
l
y
r
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
1
0
c
c
f
)
$0.40
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
2
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
4
0
$
1
.
4
0
$
1
4
.
3
0
+1.0%
+
2
.
5
%
+
3
.
0
%
+
2
.
5
%
+
3
.
0
%
+
3
.
0
%
C
i
t
y
o
f
T
u
k
w
i
l
a
W
a
t
e
r
$3
.
9
4
t
o
$
3
.
9
8
$
4
.
0
8
t
o
$
4
.
1
8
$
4
.
3
0
t
o
$
4
.
4
2
$
4
.
5
2
t
o
$
4
.
6
2
$
4
.
7
6
t
o $4.90
$
5
.
0
4
t
o
$
5
.
1
8
(
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
m
o
n
t
h
l
y
r
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
1
0
c
c
f
)
$0.40
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
2
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
4
0
$
1
.
4
0
$
7
.
6
0
Ra
n
g
e
3
%
-
2
0
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
2
0
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
2
0
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
2
0
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
0%
Ra
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
0%
0
%
Range 3%-7%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
R
a
n
g
e
3
%
-
7
%
C
i
t
y
o
f
T
u
k
w
i
l
a
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
$
6
.
0
0
t
o
$
8
.
0
0
$
8
.
0
0
t
o
$
1
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
t
o
1
2
.
0
0
1
2
.
0
0
t
o
1
4
.
0
0
1
4
.
0
0
t
o
1
5
.
0
0
1
5
.
0
0
t
o
1
6
.
0
0
$
1
6
.
0
0
1
6
.0
0
t
o
1
7
.
0
0
1
7
.
0
0
t
o
1
8
.
0
0
1
8
.
0
0
t
o
1
9
.
0
0
$
1
9
.
0
0
$
1
9
.
0
0
1
9
.
0
0
t
o
2
0
.00
2
1
.
0
0
t
o
2
2
.
0
0
2
2
.
0
0
t
o
2
3
.
0
0
2
3
.
0
0
t
o
2
4
.
0
0
2
4
.
0
0
t
o
2
5
.
0
0
ch
a
r
g
e
p
e
r
m
e
t
e
r
/
e
a
c
h
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
$2
.
0
0
$
2
.
0
0
$
2
.
0
0
$
2
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
.
00
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
8
.
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
Ra
n
g
e
+
6
6
%
R
a
n
g
e
+
5
0
%
R
a
n
g
e
+
3
3
%
+
8
%
+
6
.
5
%
R
a
n
g
e
+
5
%
+5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
2
%
+
5
%
+
6
%
+
5
%
+
6
%
+
5
%
$4
.
9
8
$
4
.
9
8
$
4
.
9
8
$
4
.
9
8
t
o
$
5
.
3
6
$
5
.
3
6
t
o
$
5
.
7
2
$
5
.
7
2
t
o
$
6
.
0
0
$
6
.
0
0
to
$
6
.
3
0
$
6
.
3
0
t
o
$
6
.
6
0
$
6
.
6
0
t
o
$
6
.
9
0
$
6
.
9
0
$
6
.
9
0
$
6
.
9
0
t
o
$
7
.
0
4
$
7
.
04 to $7.38
$
7
.
3
8
t
o
$
7
.
8
2
$
7
.
8
2
t
o
$
8
.
2
0
$
8
.
2
0
t
o
$
8
.
6
8
$
8
.
6
8
t
o
$
9.10
Co
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
$0
.
3
8
$
0
.
3
6
$
0
.
2
8
$
0
.
3
0
$
0
.
3
0
$
0
.
3
0
$
0
.
1
4
$
0
.
3
4
$
0
.
4
4
$
0
.
3
8
$
0
.
4
8
$
0
.
4
2
Mi
n
i
m
u
m
C
h
a
r
g
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
M
e
t
e
r
S
i
z
e
$
2
0
-
$
3
6
0
$
3
0
-
$
4
8
0
$
4
0
-
$
5
7
5
$
4
5
-
$
60
0
$
4
7
-
$
6
3
0
$
4
9
-
$
6
6
1
$
5
0
-
$
6
7
4
$
5
2
-
$
7
0
8
$
5
4
-
$
7
4
3
$
5
7
-
$
7
8
0
Fi
r
e
l
i
n
e
s
F
i
r
e
l
i
n
e
s
F
i
r
e
l
i
n
e
s
F
i
r
e
l
i
n
e
s
F
i
r
e
l
i
n
e
s
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
E
W
E
R
R
A
T
E
S
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
20
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
2
0
2
4
2
0
2
5
2
0
2
6
T
o
t
a
l
0%
+
1
3
.
1
7
%
0
%
+1
0
.
2
2
%
0
%
+
5
.
6
%
0
%
+
5
.
2
1
%
0
%
+
2
.
5
1
%
0
%
+
4
.
5
0
%
0
%
+
1
0
.
2
5
%
0
%
+
1
0
.
2
5
%
0
%
K
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
e
w
e
r
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
$
3
1
.
9
0
3
1
.
9
0
t
o
3
6
.
1
0
$
3
6
.
1
0
3
6
.
1
0
t
o
3
9
.
7
9
$
3
9
.
7
9
3
9
.
7
9
t
o
4
2
.
0
3
$
4
2
.
0
3
4
2
.
0
3
t
o
4
4
.
2
2
$
4
4
.
2
2
4
4
.
2
2
t
o
4
5
.3
3
$
4
5
.
3
3
4
5
.
3
3
t
o
4
7
.
3
7
$
4
7
.
3
7
4
7
.
3
7
t
o
5
2
.
2
3
$
5
2
.
2
3
5
2
.
2
3
t
o
5
7
.
5
8
$57.58
(
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
F
l
a
t
R
a
t
e
)
$4
.
2
0
$
3
.
6
9
$
2
.
2
4
$
2
.
1
9
$
1
.
1
1
$
2
.
0
4
$
4
.
8
6
$
5
.
3
5
$
3
4
.
1
8
+1
5
%
+
2
0
%
+
2
0
%
+
2
0
%
+
1
5
%
+
1
0
%
0%
0
%
+
3
.
5
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
0
%
+
3
.
4
%
C
i
t
y
o
f
T
u
k
w
i
l
a
S
e
w
e
r
1
1
.
6
4
t
o
1
3
.
3
9
13
.
3
9
t
o
1
6
.
0
6
1
6
.
0
6
t
o
1
9
.
2
6
1
9
.
2
6
t
o
2
3
.
1
0
2
3
.
1
0
t
o
2
6
.
5
0
$
2
6
.
5
0
to
$
2
9
$
2
9
.
0
0
$
2
9
.
0
0
$
2
9
t
o
$
3
0
$
3
0
.
0
0
$3
0
.
0
0
$30.00
$
3
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
t
o
$
3
1
(
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
F
l
a
t
R
a
t
e
)
$1
.
7
5
$
2
.
6
7
$
3
.
2
0
$
3
.
8
4
$
3
.
4
0
$
2
.
5
0
$
1
.
0
0
$1.00
$
2
4
.
0
0
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
S
e
w
e
r
B
i
l
l
(
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
$4
5
.
2
9
$
5
2
.
1
6
$
5
5
.
3
6
$
6
2
.
8
9
$
6
6
.
2
9
$
7
1
.
0
3
$
7
1
.
0
3
$
7
3
.
2
2
$
7
4
.
2
2
$
7
5
.
3
3
$
7
5
.3
3
$
7
7
.
3
7
$
7
7
.
3
7
$
8
2
.
2
3
$
8
2
.
2
3
$
8
7
.
5
8
$
8
8
.
5
8
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
S
e
w
e
r
R
a
t
e
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
+
1
5
%
+
3
3
.
1
7
%
+
2
0
%
+
3
0
.
2
2
%
+
1
5
%
+
1
5
.
6
%
+5
%
+
5
.
2
1
%
+
3
.
5
%
+
2
.
5
1
%
+
0
.
0
%
+4.50%
+
0
.
0
%
+10.25%
+
0
.
0
%
+
1
0
.
2
5
%
+
3
.
4
%
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
W
A
T
E
R
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
19
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
2
0
2
4
2
0
2
5
2
0
2
6
T
o
t
a
l
C
i
t
y
o
f
T
u
k
w
i
l
a
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
W
a
t
e
r
+
2
0
%
+
1
0
%
+
1
0
%
+
5
%
+
1
0
%
+
2
0
%
+
1
5
%
+5
%
+
3
%
+
5
%
+
3
%
+
2
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
h
a
r
g
e
(
b
i
l
l
e
d
J
a
n
&
J
u
l
y
)
$7
1
t
o
$
8
5
$
8
5
t
o
$
9
3
$
9
3
t
o
$
1
0
2
$
1
0
2
t
o
$
1
0
7
$
1
0
7
t
o
$
1
1
8
$
1
1
8
t
o
$1
4
2
$
1
4
2
t
o
$
1
6
3
$
1
6
3
t
o
$
1
7
1
$
1
7
1
t
o
$
1
7
6
$
1
7
6
t
o
$
1
8
5
$
1
8
5
t
o
$
1
9
0
$
1
9
0
t
o
$
1
9
4
$
1
9
4
t
o
$
2
0
4
$
2
0
4
t
o
$
2
1
4
$
2
1
4
t
o
$
2
2
4
$
2
2
4
t
o
$
2
3
5
$
2
35 to $247
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
h
a
r
g
e
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
m
o
n
t
h
l
y
$
5
.
9
2
t
o
$
7
.
0
8
$
7
.
0
8
t
o
$
7
.
7
5
$7
.
7
5
t
o
$
8
.
5
0
$
8
.
5
0
t
o
$
8
.
9
2
$
8
.
9
2
t
o
$
9
.
8
3
$
9
.
8
3
t
o
$
1
1
.
8
3
1
1
.
8
3
to
1
3
.
5
8
1
3
.
5
8
t
o
1
4
.
2
5
1
4
.
2
5
t
o
1
4
.
6
7
1
4
.
6
7
t
o
1
5
.
4
2
1
5
.
4
2
t
o
1
5
.
8
3
1
5
.
8
3
t
o
1
6
.
1
7
1
6
.
1
7
t
o
1
7
.
0
0
1
7
.
0
0
t
o
1
7
.
8
3
1
7
.
8
3
t
o
1
8
.
6
7
1
8
.
6
7
to 19.58
1
9
.
5
8
t
o
2
0
.
5
8
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
f
o
r
c
h
a
r
t
$1
.
1
6
$
0
.
6
7
$
0
.
7
5
$
0
.
4
2
$
0
.
9
1
$
2
.
0
0
$
1
.
7
5
$
0
.
6
7
$
0
.
4
2
$
0
.
7
5
$
0
.
4
1
$
0
.
3
4
$
0
.
83
$
0
.
8
3
$
0
.
8
4
$
0
.
9
1
$
1
.
0
0
$
1
6
.
2
5
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
W
a
t
e
r
-
S
a
m
e
I
n
c
r
+2
0
%
+
1
0
%
+
1
0
%
+
5
%
+
1
0
%
+
2
0
%
+
1
5
%
+
5
%
+
3
%
+
5
%
+
3
%
+2%
+
5
%
+5%
+
5
%
+
5
%
+
5
%
$4
.
9
1
$
9
.
5
4
$
5
.
9
5
$
9
.
9
5
$
5
.
3
1
$
7
.
7
4
$
1
.
7
5
$
3
.
8
6
$
2
.
4
2
$
2
.
8
6
$
0
.
4
1
$
3
.
1
8
$
3
.
83
$
9
.
0
9
$
3
.
8
4
$
1
0
.
0
6
$
5
.
8
0
$
1
1
4
.
3
3
20
1
8
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
i
l
l
20
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
2
0
2
4
2
0
2
5
2
0
2
6
Si
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
W
a
t
e
r
3
3
.
3
4
$
3
5
.
3
4
$
3
7
.
4
0
$
3
8
.
4
0
$
3
9
.
4
0
$
3
9
.
4
0
$
4
0
.
4
0
$
4
1
.
4
0
$
4
2
.
4
0
$
4
2
.
4
0
$
4
3
.
4
8
$
4
5
.
0
8
$ 48.52 $ 50.72 $ 53.40 $ 56.08 $ 6 ccf
Lo
w
I
n
c
o
m
e
S
e
n
i
o
r
s
/
D
i
s
a
b
l
e
d
S
e
w
e
r
5
2
.
1
6
5
5
.
3
6
6
2
.
8
9
6
6
.
2
9
7
1
.
0
3
7
1
.
0
3
7
3
.
2
2
7
4
.
2
2
7
5
.
3
3
7
5
.
3
3
7
7
.
3
7
7
7
.
3
7
82.23 82.23 87.58 88.58 Flat Fee
Mu
l
t
i
F
a
m
i
l
y
S
W
M
7
.
7
5
8
.
5
0
8
.
9
2
9
.
8
3
1
1
.
8
3
1
3
.
5
8
1
4
.
2
5
1
4
.
6
6
1
5
.
4
2
1
5
.
8
3
1
6
.
1
7
1
7
.
0
0
17.83 18.67 19.58 20.58 Flat Fee
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
T
o
t
a
l
93
.
2
5
$
9
9
.
2
0
$
1
0
9
.
2
1
$
1
1
4
.
5
2
$
1
2
2
.
2
6
$
1
2
4
.
0
1
$
1
2
7
.
8
7
$
1
3
0
.
2
8
$
1
3
3
.
1
5
$
1
3
3
.
5
6
$
1
3
7
.
0
2
$
1
3
9
.
4
5
$ 148.58 $ 151.62 $ 160.56 $ 165.24 $
6.
3
8
%
1
0
.
0
9
%
4
.
8
6
%
6
.
7
6
%
1
.
4
3
%
3
.
1
1
%
1
.
8
8
%
2
.
2
0
%
0
.
3
1
%
2
.
5
9
%
1
.
7
7
%
6
.
5
5
%
2
.
05%
5
.
9
0
%
2
.
9
1
%
T
o
t
a
l
M
o
n
t
h
l
y
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
q
:
g
a
i
l
\
c
i
p
\
r
a
t
e
m
a
t
r
i
x
9/28/2020Exhibit B 151
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
C
1
5
2
1
5
3
1
5
4
1
5
5
1
5
6
1
5
7
1
5
8
1
5
9
1
6
0
1
6
1
Exhibit D-1
Residential Water Rate Comparison as of June 2020
2020
Ranking CITY
2016
TOTAL
2018
TOTAL
City Base
Rate
Summer Rates
Per CCF
Consumption
Assume
10 CCF
2020
TOTAL
2021
TOTAL
2022
TOTAL
Difference
(2018)
1 WATER DISTRICT 119 (Duvall) 79.35$ 90.60$ 45.00$ 4.10/8.22 44.21 89.21$ (1.39)
2 REDMOND (CWA) 42.25 43.97 22.44 3.71/14.85 63.13 85.57 41.60
3 WOODINVILLE 67.78 82.80 22.55 41.77 61.50 84.05 1.25
4 SEATTLE 72.30 82.20 18.45 5.55/11.80 62.05$ 80.50 (1.70)
5 DUVALL 68.97 73.14 28.22 4.20/9.04 48.04 76.26 3.12
6 SKYWAY (CWA) 59.39 64.22 20.71 4.6/9.36 48.46 69.17 4.95
7 BELLEVUE 54.34 59.60 25.26 3.96 39.60 64.86 5.26
8 KIRKLAND 48.00 69.16 21.57 5.17 41.36 62.93 (6.23)
9 MERCER ISLAND 53.24 54.87 18.45 4.38 43.80 62.25 7.37
TUKWILA 2020 and 2021 20.00 3.98 58.80 61.80
11 COVINGTON WATER DISTRICT 58.62 95.32 28.33 2.80/8.50 30.30 58.63 (36.70)
12 COAL CREEK UTILITY 55.90 57.03 21.96 3.62 36.20 58.16 1.13
13 TUKWILA 2020 55.00 57.00 19.00 3.90 39.00 58.00 1.00
14 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT 53.15 59.35 15.53 3.82/4.53 41.75 57.28 (2.07)
15 KENT 57.59 53.07 24.69 2.56/5.04 30.56 55.25 2.18
16 ISSAQUAH 46.80 50.42 16.39 2.12/21.91 38.66 55.05 4.63
17 KING COUNTY WD #125 46.89 49.70 14.91 3.92 39.20 54.11 4.41
10 SAMMAMISH PLATEAU 47.11 50.93 32.03 2.02/7.92 21.96 53.99 3.06
18 AUBURN 48.54 50.25 17.18 3.41/4.73 36.35 53.53 3.28
19 NE SAMMAMISH 44.67 47.41 21.02 2.93 29.30 50.32 2.91
20 ALGONA 57.07 53.35 33.91 3.24 16.20 50.11 (3.24)
21 KING COUNTY WD #20 41.90 43.75 24.20 2.57 25.70 49.90 6.15
22 TACOMA 45.03 45.74 24.95 2.132/2.665 23.99 48.94 3.20
23 RENTON 47.35 47.35 17.95 2.59/4.39 30.35 48.30 0.95
24 CEDAR RIVER WATER DIST 50.08 63.24 18.52 2.82 28.20 46.72 (16.53)
25 BOTHELL 37.09 37.09 14.74 2.89/7.98 28.90 43.64 6.55
26 LAKEHAVEN (FEDERAL WAY) 31.19 33.92 18.63 1.64 16.40 35.03 1.11
27 SOOS CREEK 41.14 56.83 15.48 1.95/5.65 19.50 34.98 (21.86)
28 ALDERWOOD WATER DIST 35.65 51.81 22.90 2.56 10.24 33.14 (18.67)
29 LYNNWOOD 20.83 23.92 26.12 - - 26.12 27.16 28.25 2.20
AVERAGE 50.59$ 56.83$ 21.70$ 56.76$
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/Shared Documents/CIP 2021-2026/Utility Rate Surveys Water, Sewer & SSWM 2020
162
ATTACHMENT D
City of Tukwila
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
2021 - 2026 Analysis in 000's
REVENUES 2017
Actual
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Budget
2020
Estimate 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Totals
Monthly Water Charges (1)+5%
Commercial
+5%
Commercial
+5%
Commercial
+5%
Commercial
+5%
Commercial +2% +5% +6% +5% +6% +6%
Cascade Water Alliance (CWA) 2,905 2,372 2,707 3,256 3,256 3,289 3,356 3,524 3,629 3,701 3,776 21,275
Regular City Water 3,841 4,569 4,030 4,110 2,789 3,353 3,488 3,723 3,902 4,022 4,142 22,630
Subtotal Water 6,746 6,941 6,737 7,366 6,045 6,642 6,844 7,247 7,531 7,723 7,918 43,905
Other Miscellaneous Revenue 96 125 352 58 60 60 83 130 135 140 145 693
Interlocal Ags\PWTF\Grants/Bonds 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,900 1,600 2,500 2,000 1,000 10,000
Water Connection Fees (2)216 108 37 100 82 20 20 20 20 20 20 120
Total Revenues 7,058 7,174 7,126 7,524 6,187 7,722 8,847 8,997 10,186 9,883 9,083 54,718
EXPENDITURES
CWA Purchased Water (3)2,905 2,372 2,707 3,142 3,256 3,256 3,356 3,524 3,629 3,701 3,776 21,242
Water Operations & Maintenance 2,172 3,141 2,345 2,325 1,926 2,459 2,520 2,423 2,471 2,520 2,621 15,014
Debt Service (4)146 147 146 145 145 144 129 128 128 47 47 623
Debt Service for PW Shops 340 181 186 167 324 1,004 1,005 1,004 1,003 4,507
Interfund Utility Tax (5) 10%677 698 677 742 611 670 693 738 767 786 806 4,460
Engineering Labor (7)53 88 63 76 69 117 119 70 72 74 76 528
Subtotal 5,953 6,446 6,278 6,611 6,193 6,813 7,141 7,887 8,072 8,132 8,329 46,374
Water Capital - CIP Program 2,041 1,811 265 2,205 178 1,725 2,455 3,140 2,605 2,280 1,240 13,445
Total Expenditures 7,994 8,257 6,543 8,816 6,371 8,538 9,596 11,027 10,677 10,412 9,569 59,819
FUND BALANCE
Change in Fund Balance (a)(936) (1,083) 583 (1,292) (184) (816) (749) (2,030) (491) (529) (486) (5,101)
Beginning Balance 6,693 5,691 6,058 4,380 5,787 5,604 4,787 4,039 2,009 1,518 989 5,487
Ending Balance 5,757 4,608 6,641 3,088 5,604 4,787 4,039 2,009 1,518 989 503 386
Fund Balance:
Reserved (b) 20% of revenue 1,302 1,412 1,435 1,302 1,302 1,237 1,344 1,389 1,479 1,537 1,577 1,577
Unreserved 4,455 3,196 5,206 1,786 4,301 3,550 2,694 619 39 (548) (1,074)(1,074)
Ending Balance 5,757 4,608 6,641 3,088 5,604 4,787 4,039 2,009 1,518 989 503 503
(a) Revenues in excess of (less than) expenditures
(b) Annual reserve balance requirement equals 20% of the prior year operating revenues.
2021 - 2026 Financial Planning Model XXXIII 9/24/2020163
2021 – 2026 Financial Planning Model XXXIV
ATTACHMENT D-1
NOTES TO WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
1) Rates reflect increases of 2% in 2021, 5% in 2022, and 5%/6% in 2023 through 2026. These
rate increases are essential to sustain our reserve balance and cover any possible increases
from Cascade Water Alliance (CWA). We will continue to review the annual rate model to
confirm that the proposed increases are necessary.
Future water purchased at additional costs will be passed on to ratepayers. We have identified
Cascade Water Alliance’s revenues and expenditures to better reflect the actual water charges
and the respective increases. CWA has proposed rate increases of 2.2% in 2021 and 2.2% in
2022.
2) Connection fees are estimated for the Allentown/Foster Point and Duwamish projects.
3) Cascade Water Alliance is split out to identify the actual costs of purchased water. CWA has
scheduled increases in their six-year planning model that will affect our water rates.
4) Debt schedule includes Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) loans and Bonds.
Water Debt Service includes: Expires 2021 2022
2003 PWTF Duwamish (20%) 7/1/21 $ 14,526.53 Completed
2004 PWTF Allentown (26%) 7/1/24 82,238.00 $ 81,834.87
2006 Bond Allentown (26%) 12/31/26 46,934.54 47,370.05
Subtotal $ 143,699.07 $129,204.92
2018 Public Works Shops (17%) 12/31/38 136,714.00 260,814.00
2019 Public Works Shops (17%) 12/31/39 30,118.22 63,217.22
Total $310,531.29 $453,236.14
5) An Interfund Utility Tax was approved in October 2009 for the water, sewer, and surface
water utilities. Gross revenues are currently taxed 10% through December 31, 2021.
6) The Working Capital Reserve Fund’s policy was updated in 2012 per Resolution No. 1774 to
maintain an adequate fund balance in each of the enterprise funds. For the Enterprise Funds,
the unrestricted fund balance shall equal or exceed 20% of the previous year’s revenue,
exclusive of significant non-operating, non-recurring revenues.
7) The Senior Water/Sewer Engineer’s salary and benefits are split evenly between the water
department and the sewer department. For 2021 and 2022, Technology staff have been added
at 22% for the GIS Coordinator and 10% for the Information Systems Project Analyst.
Water Enterprise Fund
The City’s Enterprise Funds account for utility operations that are self-
supported through user charges. The utilities are financed and operated
like a private business enterprise which requires periodic determination of
revenues earned; expenses incurred, and net income for capital
maintenance, public policy, management control and accountability. The
Water Fund accounts for operations and capital improvements to provide
water to a portion of City residents. King County Water District 125 and
Highline Water District also supply water to City residents.
164
City of Tukwila
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
for
2021 - 2026
CIP
Page # PROJECT TITLE 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 TOTAL
**Other
Sources
After Six
Years
60 Water Reservoir and Pump Station 1,000 1,900 1,600 2,500 2,000 1,000 10,000 10,000 0
61 Macadam Rd S Water Upgrade 650 400 1,300 0 0 0 2,350 0 0
62 GIS Inventory of Water System 50 100 50 100 105 100 505 0 0
63 Water Comprehensive Plan 20 00001001200200
64 Interurban Water Reuse 5 5 60 5 65 10 150 0 0
65 S 152nd Place Waterline Extension 0 50 130 0 0 0 180 0 0
66 S 152nd Street Waterline Replacement 00001103014000
Baker Blvd Water Main Replacement 000000 001,595
Strander Blvd Waterline Upgrade 000000 003,300
Allentown Phase III - Water Revitalization 000000 00560
57th Ave S Waterline Replacement 000000 000
Southcenter Blvd Water Main Replacement 000000 00870
S 140th St Waterline Replacement 000000 00260
S 180th & W Valley Loop/Renton Turnover 000000 002,464
Foster Area Water Upgrade 000000 001,390
West Valley Hwy East Side Water Looping 000000 001,400
58th Ave S Water Main Replacement 000000 000
West Valley Deep Water Main Replacement 000000 00690
65th Ave S Water Main Replacement 000000 002,240
49th Ave S Water Main Replacement 000000 001,400
S 180th St Water Main Replacement 000000 001,232
Evans Black Dr Water Main Replacement 000000 00780
S 112 St Water Looping 000000 001,140
S 153rd St Water Main Replacement 000000 00350
Corporate Dr S Water Main Replacement 000000 00560
Foster Playfield Reclaimed Water Extension 000000 001,680
Duwamish River Crossing Reclaimed Water 000000 00193
Grand Total 1,725 2,455 3,140 2,605 2,280 1,240 13,445 10,000 22,304
** Denotes other funding sources, grants, or mitigation.
Project sheets scheduled beyond 2026
Changes from 2019 to 2021 CIP: can be found in the City's website under
Deleted:Public Works Capital Improvement Program.
Martin Luther King Jr Way Water Main, no longer needed.
Minkler Blvd Water Looping, completed by developer.
Crystal Springs Intertie with Highline WD, no longer needed.
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
401.98
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program 59 9/28/2020165
Exhibit D-2
Residential Sewer Rate Comparison as of June 2020
2020
Ranking CITY
County
Sewer
Treatment
2016
Total
2017
Total
2018
Total
2020 City
Charge
King County
Sewer
2020
Total 2021 2022
1 SEATTLE (Typical) KC 122.70$ 129.30$ 122.70$ 144.62$ 45.33$ 189.95$
2 SKYWAY KC 78.56 90.87 137.28 45.33 182.61
3 SAMMAMISH PLATEAU KC 75.19 79.13 37.22 45.33 82.55
TUKWILA 2021-2022 KC 82.23 82.23
4 MERCER ISLAND KC 60.36 62.60 65.10 33.70 45.33 79.03
5 DUVALL * 70.82 72.09 74.25 77.86 0.00 77.86
6 LAKEHAVEN * & KC 54.91 55.63 58.44 32.17 45.33 77.50
7 RENTON KC 70.26 72.98 74.13 30.51 45.33 75.84
8 TUKWILA 2019-2020 KC 71.03 73.22 74.22 30.00 45.33 75.33
9 NE SAMMAMISH KC 65.95 70.60 70.60 28.53 45.33 73.86
10 WOODINVILLE KC 69.18 71.34 71.37 27.15 45.33 72.48
11 CEDAR RIVER W & S KC 62.60 65.00 67.09 25.85 45.33 71.18
12 AUBURN KC 66.32 69.11 69.11 25.45 45.33 70.78
13 KENT KC 61.46 66.38 68.16 25.44 45.33 70.77
14 BELLEVUE KC 81.23 83.42 86.92 23.80 45.33 69.13
15 COAL CREEK KC 63.09 66.03 66.03 22.24 45.33 67.57
2019 BLACK DIAMOND KC 62.00 65.24 65.24 21.78 45.33 67.11
17 ALGONA KC 53.77 62.50 20.65 45.33 65.98
18 ALDERWOOD KC 57.75 58.50 58.50 20.64 45.33 65.97
19 ISSAQUAH KC 66.76 na 71.87 19.89 45.33 65.22
20 REDMOND KC 56.18 58.37 19.86 45.33 65.19
21 LAKE FOREST PARK KC 59.12 62.16 19.02 45.33 64.35
22 SOOS CREEK KC 59.88 61.58 62.61 18.76 45.33 64.09
23 KIRKLAND KC 86.83 93.02 16.47 45.33 61.80
24 VALLEY VIEW SEWER KC 54.05 57.00 58.85 16.07 45.33 61.40
2019 NORTHSHORE KC 56.70 59.30 59.30 13.97 45.33 59.30
26 TACOMA * 65.79 55.17 57.72 52.26 0.00 52.26
27 MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT * 26.00 27.00 27.00 48.35 0.00 48.35
28 LYNNWOOD 41.87 43.85 44.80 47.93 0.00 47.93 49.74 51.60
29 SOUTHWEST Suburban Sewer * 34.30 34.75 38.75 0.00 38.75
AVERAGE 63.95$ 65.97$ 67.41$ 37.11$ 74.63$
*Own their own sewer treatment plants
KC is King County Sewer Treatment
PC is Pierce County Sewer Treatment
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/Shared Documents/CIP 2021-2026/Utility Rate Surveys Water, Sewer & SSWM 2020
166
ATTACHMENT E
City of Tukwila
SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
2021 - 2026 Analysis in 000's
REVENUES 2017
Actual
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Budget
2020
Estimate 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Totals
Monthly Sewer Charges +5.2% +3.5% KC 0% 0%
KC
+4.5%0%KC
+10.25%0%KC
+10.25%
City
+3.4%
King County Metro Sewer (1)4,546 4,697 4,840 4,762 4,333 4,977 4,977 5,487 5,487 6,049 6,049 33,026
Regular City Sewer (2)4,865 4,898 4,927 4,720 4,368 4,725 4,730 4,735 4,740 4,745 4,887 28,562
Subtotal Sewer Revenue 9,411 9,595 9,767 9,482 8,701 9,702 9,707 10,222 10,227 10,794 10,936 61,588
Other Misc. Revenue 328 543 976 305 391 305 305 300 300 300 300 1,810
Grant/Bonds/PWTF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sewer Connection Fees (3)328 244 150 125 85 25 25 0 100 100 0 250
Total Revenues 10,067 10,382 10,893 9,912 9,177 10,032 10,037 10,522 10,627 11,194 11,236 63,648
EXPENDITURES
Sewer Operations & Maintenance
King County Metro Sewer (4)4,546 4,697 4,840 4,762 4,333 4,977 4,977 5,487 5,487 6,049 6,049 33,026
Regular City Sewer (5)1,618 2,109 1,330 1,493 1,773 1,623 1,636 1,639 1,689 1,740 1,800 10,127
Debt Service (6)358 359 356 360 355 352 352 348 347 154 154 1,707
Debt Service for PW Shops 80 101 719 93 181 561 561 561 561 2,518
Interfund Utility Tax (7) 10%972 1,000 1,006 979 909 1,001 1,001 1,052 1,053 1,109 1,124 6,340
Engineering Labor (9)79 88 93 76 96 469 478 429 84 86 88 1,634
Subtotal 7,573 8,253 7,705 7,771 8,185 8,515 8,625 9,516 9,221 9,699 9,776 55,352
Sewer Capital - CIP Program 1,468 1,410 416 1,900 498 3,202 2,865 2,145 2,755 3,965 3,485 18,417
Total Expenditures 9,041 9,663 8,121 9,671 8,683 11,717 11,490 11,661 11,976 13,664 13,261 73,769
FUND BALANCE
Change in Fund Balance (a)1,026 719 2,772 241 494 (1,685) (1,453) (1,139) (1,349) (2,470) (2,025) (10,121)
Beginning Balance 7,827 8,697 8,651 8,941 12,269 12,763 11,078 9,625 8,486 7,137 4,667 12,763
Ending Balance 8,853 9,416 11,423 9,182 12,763 11,078 9,625 8,486 7,137 4,667 2,642 2,642
Fund Balance:
Reserved (b) 20% of revenue 1,896 2,013 2,076 2,179 2,179 1,982 2,006 2,007 2,104 2,125 2,239 2,239
Unreserved 6,957 7,403 9,347 7,003 10,584 9,096 7,619 6,478 5,033 2,541 403 403
Ending Balance 8,853 9,416 11,423 9,182 12,763 11,078 9,625 8,486 7,137 4,667 2,642 2,642
(a) Revenues in excess of (less than) expenditures
(b) Annual reserve balance requirement equals 20% of the prior year operating revenues.
2021 - 2026 Financial Planning Model XXXV 9/24/2020167
2021 – 2026 Financial Planning Model XXXVI
ATTACHMENT E-1
NOTES TO SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
1) King County Metro sewer and Tukwila’s sewer have been split out to present the revenues
separately. Metro increases will be passed through to the sewer ratepayers. King County Metro
sewer fees will increase 4.50% in 2021 per KC Ordinance No. 19106 and we have factored in
potential King County increases for 2022 through 2026.
2) No rate increases are proposed for Tukwila sewer in 2021 and 2022. We will continue with the
annual rate model review to confirm that the proposed increases are necessary.
3) Sewer connection fees for Allentown Phase I and Allentown/Foster Point Phase II.
4) King County Metro Sewer treatment fees are passed through to ratepayers.
5) City’s basic operation and maintenance costs.
6) Includes the Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loan and the 2006 Bond for the Allentown/Foster
Point Phase II Sewer Improvement Project.
Sewer Debt Service includes: Expires 2021 2022
2004 PWTF Allentown (62%) 7/1/24 $196,260.78 $195,144.69
2006 Bond Allentown (62%) 12/31/26 111,920.83 112,959.35
2013 PWTF CBD Sewer Rehab 12/31/33 43,645.48 43,439.59
Subtotal $351,672.31 $351,543.63
2018 Public Works Shops (10%) 12/31/38 76,399.00 145,749.00
2019 Public Works Shops (10%) 12/31/39 16,830.77 35,327.27
Total $445,056.86 $532,619.90
7) An Interfund Utility Tax was approved in October 2009 for the water, sewer, and surface water
utilities. Gross revenues are currently taxed 10% through December 31, 2021.
8) The Working Capital Reserve Fund’s policy was updated in 2012 per Resolution No. 1774 to
maintain an adequate fund balance in each of the enterprise funds. For the Enterprise Funds,
the unrestricted fund balance shall equal or exceed 20% of the previous year’s revenue,
exclusive of significant non-operating, non-recurring revenues.
9) The Senior Water/Sewer Engineer’s salary and benefits are split evenly between the water
department and the sewer department. For 2021 through 2023, a Senior Program Manager and
a Project Manager have been added to the Sewer Fund. For 2021 and 2022, Technology staff
have been added at 22% for the GIS Coordinator and 10% for the Information Systems Project
Analyst to assist with the GIS Inventory of the sewer fund.
Sewer Enterprise Fund
The City’s Enterprise Funds account for utility operations that are self-
supported through user charges. The utilities are financed and operated like
a private business enterprise which requires periodic determination of
revenues earned; expenses incurred, and net income for capital
maintenance, public policy, management control and accountability. The
Sewer Fund accounts for operations and capital improvements to provide
sanitary sewer to a portion of City residents. Valley View Sewer District also
provides sewer in the City.
168
City of Tukwila
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
for
2021 - 2026
CIP
Page # PROJECT TITLE 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 TOTAL
*Other
Sources
After Six
Years
68 Annual Sewer Repair Program 937 995 875 875 885 885 5,452 0 1,700
69 GIS Inventory of Sewer System 10 50 20 50 100 50 280 0 400
70 CBD Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 1,695 1,170 550 550 0 0 3,965 0 0
71 Sewer Lift Stations & Generator Upgrades 240 0 0 480 480 0 1,200 0 910
72 Sewer Lift Station No. 2 Upgrades 170 00000 17002,300
73 Sewer Comprehensive Plan 150 0000150 3000150
74 Abandon Sewer Lift Station No. 9 0 450 700 0 0 0 1,150 0 0
75 Southcenter Blvd Sewer Upgrade 0 200 0 100 1,150 550 2,000 0 0
Sewer Repair at 14438 59th Ave S 00000650 6500 0
Sewer Replacement at 14025 Interurban Ave 00000100 1000900
Future Sewer Lift Station No. 13 0 0 0 700 1,350 1,100 3,150 0 0
Valley View West Hill Sewer Transfer Area 000000 00 0
Sewer Lift Station No. 12 000000 004,400
APW Sewer connection to KC Metro 000000 00300
Allentown Phase III - Sewer Revitalization 000000 001,440
Ryan Hill - Sewer Revitalization 000000 001,900
Grand Total 3,202 2,865 2,145 2,755 3,965 3,485 18,417 0 14,400
** Denotes other funding sources, grants, or mitigation.
Changes from 2019 to 2021 CIP: Project sheets scheduled beyond 2026
can be found in the City's website under
Deleted:Public Works Capital Improvement Program.
Sewer Repair West of Strander Blvd Bridge, included in 2020 Sewer Repair
Sewer Lift Station Locations
Lift Station No. 1 - Master Telemetry Panel 600 Minkler Blvd. - Shops
Lift Station No. 2 - Backup Dialer 1105 Andover Pk W (at Minkler Blvd)
Lift Station No. 3 550 Minkler Blvd
Lift Station No. 4 6790 Todd Blvd - Southcenter South
Lift Station No. 5 6830 Fort Dent Way (entrance to Park)
Lift Station No. 6 6820 Fort Dent Way (only serves Park)
Lift Station No. 7 - Abandoned in 2011 was at 14601 Interurban - replaced by gravity sewer
Lift Station No. 8 13359 56th Ave S - Foster Point (new in 2007)
Lift Station No. 9 12638 Interurban - Suburban Propane
Lift Station No. 10 12218 51st Pl S - Allentown (new in 2007)
Lift Station No. 11 18799 Southcenter Pkwy (new in 2012)
Lift Station No. 12 255 Andover Park W - Key Bank parking lot at mall
Lift Station No. 13 Future - Tukwila Pkwy & Andover Park W
SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
402.98
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program 67 9/28/2020169
Exhibit D-3
CITY
2015
Yearly Rate
2016
Yearly Rate
2018
Yearly Rate
Monthly
Rate (2020)
2020
Yearly Rate
2021
Yearly Rate
2022
Yearly Rate
Seattle (Mid 6,000 SF) 350.40$ 390.03$ 480.86$ 46.52 558.27$
Sammamish 208.68$ 214.00$ 225.00$ 31.67 380.00$
Tacoma (typical) 267.00$ 294.36$ 26.40 316.80$
King County 171.50$ 171.50$ 240.44$ 24.08 289.00$
Newcastle 159.36$ 159.36$ 202.79$ 23.53 282.36$
Shoreline 150.09$ 160.77$ 214.39$ 22.60 271.20$
Bellevue (1/3 acre) 206.82$ 372.00$ 372.00$ 21.70 260.40$
Duvall 230.52$ 241.68$ 21.12 253.44$
Auburn 231.00$ 236.76$ 242.64$ 18.58 222.96$
Mercer Island 188.76$ 191.28$ 201.60$ 17.33 207.96$
Tukwila 2022 204.00$
Issaquah 168.96$ 177.36$ 190.92$ 16.96 203.52$
Redmond 198.72$ 198.72$ 198.72$ 16.56 198.72$
Tukwila 2021 194.00$
Tukwila 2020 163.00$ 176.00$ 15.83 190.00
Algona 114.00$ 162.00$ 15.50 186.00$
Renton 158.40$ 164.76$ 178.20$ 15.15 181.80$
Burien 153.45$ 156.99$ 164.40$ 14.48 173.74$
Lynnwood 242.40$ 261.84$ 305.64$ 13.52 162.18$ 167.04$ 172.08$
Kent 146.64$ 146.64$ 150.12$ 13.03 156.36$
SeaTac 134.15$ 134.15$ 149.91$ 12.49 149.91$
Federal Way 95.37$ 96.90$ 101.60$ 8.95 107.37$
Average 237.60$
SINGLE FAMILY SURFACE WATER RATES
as of September, 2020
$‐
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
$400.00
$500.00
$600.00
Se
a
t
t
l
e
(
M
i
d
6
,
0
0
0
S
F
)
Sa
m
m
a
m
i
s
h
Ta
c
o
m
a
(
t
y
p
i
c
a
l
)
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ne
w
c
a
s
t
l
e
Sh
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
Be
l
l
e
v
u
e
(
1
/
3
a
c
r
e
)
Du
v
a
l
l
Au
b
u
r
n
Me
r
c
e
r
I
s
l
a
n
d
Tu
k
w
i
l
a
2
0
2
2
Is
s
a
q
u
a
h
Re
d
m
o
n
d
Tu
k
w
i
l
a
2
0
2
1
Tu
k
w
i
l
a
2
0
2
0
Al
g
o
n
a
Re
n
t
o
n
Bu
r
i
e
n
Ly
n
n
w
o
o
d
Ke
n
t
Se
a
T
a
c
Fe
d
e
r
a
l
W
a
y
Series1
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/Shared Documents/CIP 2021-2026/Utility Rate Surveys Water, Sewer & SSWM 2020 170
ATTACHMENT F
City of Tukwila
SURFACE WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
REVENUES 2017
Actual
2018
Actual
2019
Actual
2020
Budget
2020
Estimate 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
+5% +3% +5% +3% +3% +2% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%
Annual Billings (Current) (1)6,148 6,344 6,739 6,863 6,863 7,000 7,350 7,717 8,103 8,508 8,934 47,612
Other Revenues 157 73 71 50 47 50 50 60 65 70 70 365
Grants/Bond Proceeds (2)194 470 310 1,077 1,556 1,833 3,109 1,654 5,975 225 216 13,012
Total Revenues 6,499 6,887 7,120 7,990 8,466 8,883 10,509 9,431 14,143 8,803 9,220 60,989
EXPENDITURES `
Operations & Maintenance 2,033 2,139 2,823 2,414 2,094 2,278 2,261 2,509 2,584 2,635 2,688 14,955
Debt Service (3)303 302 301 301 300 298 285 283 282 22 22 1,474
Debt Service for PW Shops 1,570 1,757 220 791 231 448 1,387 1,388 1,388 1,387 6,229
Interfund Utility Tax (4) 10%617 637 676 691 691 705 740 778 817 858 900 4,798
Engineering Labor (6)208 246 148 590 390 667 678 629 633 646 659 3,912
Subtotal 3,161 4,894 5,705 4,216 4,266 4,179 4,412 5,586 5,704 5,549 5,656 31,086
SSWM Capital - CIP Program 3,098 4,305 917 4,400 2,021 4,624 7,330 4,973 8,441 4,290 2,020 31,678
Total Expenditures 6,259 9,199 6,622 8,616 6,287 8,803 11,742 10,559 14,145 9,839 7,676 62,764
FUND BALANCE
Change in Fund Balance (a)240 (2,312) 498 (626) 2,179 80 (1,233) (1,128) (2) (1,036) 1,544 (1,775)
Beginning Balance 2,603 2,999 2,709 2,595 3,207 5,386 5,466 4,233 3,105 3,104 2,068 5,386
Ending Balance 2,843 687 3,207 1,969 5,386 5,466 4,233 3,105 3,104 2,068 3,611 3,611
Fund Balance:
Reserved (b) 20% of revenue 1,261 1,283 1,362 1,383 1,382 1,230 1,410 1,480 1,555 1,634 1,716 1,716
Unreserved 1,582 (596) 1,845 586 4,004 4,236 2,823 1,625 1,548 434 1,896 1,896
Ending Balance 2,843 687 3,207 1,969 5,386 5,466 4,233 3,105 3,104 2,068 3,611 3,611
(a) Revenues in excess of (less than) expenditures
(b) Annual reserve balance requirement equals 20% of the prior year operating revenues.
2021 - 2026 Analysis in 000's
2021 - 2026 Financial Planning Model XXXVII 9/24/2020171
2021 – 2026 Financial Planning Model XXXVIII
ATTACHMENT F-1
NOTES TO SURFACE WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
1) Reflects proposed rate increases of 2% in 2021, and 5% in 2022 through 2026. We will
continue with the annual rate model review to confirm that the proposed Surface Water rate
increases are necessary.
The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit required by the State
Department of Ecology is having a significant impact on the Surface Water fund.
2) Potential grants and/or bond revenue. Included is the estimated Department of Ecology grant
for NPDES and King County Flood Control District Opportunity grants as well as significant
grant funding for the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project, the Storm Quality Retrofit
Project, the East Marginal Way Storm Outfalls Project, the Gilliam Creek Fish Barrier Removal
Project and the Chinook Wind Project.
3) Debt schedule includes PWTF loans and the 2006 Allentown Bond.
Debt Service includes: Expires 2021 2022
2004 PWTF Duwamish (15%) 7/01/21 $ 11,633.00 Completed
2004 PWTF Cascade View Const. 7/01/24 226,587.02 $ 225,476.31
2004 PWTF Allentown (12%) 7/01/24 37,956.00 37,769.94
2006 Bond Allentown (12%) 12/31/26 21,662.10 21,863.10
Subtotal $ 297,859.71 $ 285,109.35
2018 Public Works Shops (23%) 188,987.00 360,537.00
2019 Public Works Shops (23%) 12/31/38 41,634.01 87,388.51
Total $ 528,480.72 $ 733,034.86
4) An Interfund Utility Tax was approved in October 2009 for the water, sewer, and surface water
utilities. Gross revenues are currently taxed 10% through December 31, 2021.
5) The Working Capital Reserve Fund’s policy was updated in 2012 per Resolution No. 1774 to
maintain an adequate fund balance in each of the enterprise funds. For the Enterprise Funds,
the unrestricted fund balance shall equal or exceed 20% of the previous year’s revenue,
exclusive of significant non-operating, non-recurring revenues.
6) Cost of engineering to support capital projects, NPDES, and operation efforts in-house. For
2021 and 2022, Technology staff have been added at 22% for the GIS Coordinator and 10%
for the Information Systems Project Analyst to assist with the GIS Inventory of the Surface
Water fund.
Surface Water Enterprise Fund
The City’s Enterprise Funds account for utility operations that are self-
supported through user charges. The utilities are financed and operated like
a private business enterprise which requires periodic determination of
revenues earned; expenses incurred, and net income for capital
maintenance, public policy, management control and accountability. The
Surface Water Enterprise Fund accounts for operations and capital
improvements for the City’s storm drainage and surface water management
function. Surface Water projects are required to meet Federal, State and local
mandates. The largest contributor to the surface water enterprise fund is the
City of Tukwila.
172
City of Tukwila
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
for
2021 - 2026
Page
#PROJECT TITLE 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 TOTAL
**Other
Sources
After Six
Years
78 Annual Small Drainage Program 900 900 900 900 970 970 5,540 0 673
79 Storm Water Quality Retrofit Program 115 3,314 105 105 110 105 3,854 2,160 115
80 NPDES Program 100 50 55 55 60 60 380 110 65
81 WRIA 9 Watershed Planning 20 21 21 21 22 23 128 87 23
82 Green the Green Program 45 145 55 155 40 173 613 150 200
83 Surface Water Monitoring 35 37 37 38 38 39 224 0 39
84 East Marginal Wy S Stormwater Outfalls 1,276 0 0 0 0 0 1,276 842 0
85 Gilliam Creek Fish Barrier Removal 936 536 405 5,952 2,400 0 10,229 7,076 0
86 Tukwila 205 Levee Certification 500 500 650 650 650 650 3,600 600 0
87 Nelson Side Channel 225 240 1,825 0 0 0 2,290 1,550 0
88 Surface Water Comprehensive Plan 200 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 250
89 S 131st Pl Drainage Improvements 150 1,000 0 0 0 0 1,150 250 0
90 Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal 55 0 0 0 0 0 55 50 0
91 Chinook Wind 59 357 0 0 0 0 416 137 0
92 Surface Water GIS Inventory 0 100 0 150 0 0 250 0 0
93 Northwest Gilliam Storm Drainage System 0 100 840 0 0 0 940 0 0
94 Tukwila Pkwy/Gilliam Creek Outfalls 0 0 60 415 0 0 475 0 0
S 146th St Pipe & 35th Ave S Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,066
Soils Reclamation Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,375
S 143rd Street Storm Drainage System 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,096
Nelsen Pl/Longacres Surface Water Phase II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 345
Duwamish Rvrbk Stabilization at S 104th St 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 595
TUC Surface Water Conveyance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 541
Grand Total 4,616 7,300 4,953 8,441 4,290 2,020 31,620 13,012 6,383
** Denotes other funding sources, grants, or mitigation.
Project sheets scheduled beyond 2026
can be found in the City's website under
Changes from 2019 to 2021 CIP:Public Works Capital Improvement Program.
Additions
93 Surface Water Monitoring
Surface Water Lift Station Locations
Storm Lift Station No. 15 5910 S 180th St - Mizuki Grill
Storm Lift Station No. 16 7420 S 180th St (underpass)
Storm Lift Station No. 17 530 Strander Blvd - Bicentennial Park
Storm Lift Station No. 18 4225 S 122nd St - Allentown
Storm Lift Station No. 19 Fort Dent Park (Parks Dept.)
SURFACE WATER
412 Fund
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program 77 9/28/2020173
W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transportation fees 9-22-20
GL:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 1 of 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW PUBLIC WORKS
FEE SCHEDULE; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1945.
WHEREAS, each year the City analyzes the rate model for the three utility enterprise
funds, which are water, sewer and surface water, to ensure revenues keep pace with
expenses, to update the traffic model, and to analyze the transportation network to ensure
continued compliance with the Growth Management Act and the City's adopted
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to impose fees to recoup the costs of services
rendered; and
WHEREAS, per an Interagency Agreement, the City will have the King County
Treasury Operations provide services for managing the City’s surface water management
database, include the City’s surface water charges on ratepayers’ King County property
tax bill, and provide customer service related to those surface water charges;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public Works fees will be charged according to the following schedule,
which shall supersede any previously adopted Public Works Fee Schedule and take effect
as of January 1, 2021:
PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE
WATER RATES FEE
Water Meter Installation
.75 inch
1 inch
1.5 inch
2 inch
3 inch
4 inch
6 inch
$ 600.00
$ 1,100.00
$ 2,400.00
$ 2,800.00
$ 4,400.00
$ 7,800.00
$12,500.00
Water Meter Deduct $25.00
Exhibit E
174
W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transportation fees 9-22-20
GL:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 2 of 6
WATER RATES (CONT.) FEE
Water Base Charge (Monthly)
Single Family (one dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (more than one dwelling unit, each
dwelling is charged the base charge)
Commercial/Industrial Customers:
3/4 inch Service
1 inch Service
1-1/2 inch Service
2 inch Service
3 inch Service
4 inch Service
6 inch Service
8 inch Service
10 inch Service
12 inch Service
In addition to the monthly water base charge, each
100 cubic feet of water used will be charged as
shown in “Water Rates (Monthly).”
Current Proposed Proposed
2020 2021 2022
$ 19.00 $ 19.00 $ 20.00
$ 19.00 $ 19.00 $ 20.00
Current Proposed Proposed
2020 2021 2022
$ 49.00 $ 50.00 $ 52.00
$ 61.00 $ 62.00 $ 65.00
$ 88.00 $ 90.00 $ 94.00
$115.00 $117.00 $123.00
$165.00 $168.00 $176.00
$220.00 $224.00 $235.00
$331.00 $338.00 $355.00
$441.00 $450.00 $472.00
$551.00 $562.00 $590.00
$661.00 $674.00 $708.00
Water Rates (Monthly)
Single Family Residence (Oct-May)
Single Family Residence (Jun-Sept)
Multi-Family (Oct-May)
Multi-Family (Jun-Sept)
Commercial/Industrial (Oct-May)
Commercial/Industrial (Jun-Sept)
In addition to the monthly water base charge listed
above, each 100 cubic feet of water will be charged at
the following rates:
Current Proposed Proposed
2020 2021 2022
$2.80 $2.86 $3.00
$3.90 $3.98 $4.18
$3.40 $3.46 $3.62
$4.70 $4.78 $5.02
$5.10 $5.20 $5.44
$6.90 $7.04 $7.38
Fire Protection Service Charges (Monthly)
2 inch Service
3 inch Service
4 inch Service
6 inch Service
8 inch Service
10 inch Service
12 inch Service
Per month based on size of service.
Current Proposed Proposed
2020 2021 2022
$ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.50
$ 22.00 $ 22.00 $ 23.00
$ 39.00 $ 39.00 $ 41.00
$ 88.00 $ 88.00 $ 92.00
$132.00 $132.00 $138.00
$220.00 $220.00 $230.00
$287.00 $287.00 $300.00
175
W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transportation fees 9-22-20
GL:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 3 of 6
WATER SERVICES FEE
Water Turn On $ 50.00
After-Hour Water Turn On – additional fee for
customer requested after-hours water turn on
$ 100.00
Unauthorized Water Usage – after shut-off for
non-payment
$ 100.00
Special Meter Read – customer requested
meter read outside normal read schedule
$ 30.00
Shut-off notice $ 30.00
Change in owner, tenant, and/or third party
paying agent
$ 20.00
Emergency Conservation Sanction $ 100.00
WATER SERVICES FEE
Temporary Water Meter Deposit
.75” and 1” water meter
2.5” water meter
Temporary Water Meter Rental per minimum
60 days expiration
.75” and 1” water meter
2.5” water meter
$ 300.00
$1,500.00
$ 75.00
$ 150.00
WATER INTEREST CHARGE RATE
On all water accounts 30 days in arrears from
the date of delinquency until paid 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis
SEWER RATES FEES
Residential Sewer Service
(single dwelling unit)
Flat rate of $30.00 per month
[TMC 14.16.030 (1)]
Residential Sewer Service (multiple dwelling
unit, permanent type)
Flat rate of $30.00 per month for each dwelling unit
[TMC 14.16.030 (2)].
Commercial and Industrial Sewage Service Flat rate of $55.36 per month and, in addition,
any usage over 750 cubic feet of water per month
shall be at the rate of $55.36 per 750 cubic feet
[TMC 14.16.030 (4)].
Flat rate of $55.36 per month and, in addition,
any usage over 750 cubic feet of water per month
shall be at the rate of $55.36 per 750 cubic feet
[TMC 14.16.030 (4)].
SEWER INTEREST CHARGE RATE
On all sewer accounts 30 days in arrears from
the date of delinquency until paid 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis
176
W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transportation fees 9-22-20
GL:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 4 of 6
SEWAGE TREATMENT RATES
As of 2021, the City Sewage Treatment Charges as required by the Agreement for Sewage Disposal
between the King County Metropolitan Services and the City of Tukwila are set at a flat rate of $47.37 per
single family dwelling.
For multiple family and commercial/industrial accounts, there is a minimum charge of $47.37 per meter
for up to 750 cubic feet of consumption plus $47.37 per each additional 750 cubic feet or fraction thereof.
(Consumption x 6.044) (47.37 / 7.5)
SURFACE WATER RATES FEE PER YEAR
Surface Water Utility Rates Per Year
Category:
1. Natural
2. 0 - 20% Developed Surface
3. 21 - 50% Developed Surface
4. 51 - 70% Developed Surface
5. 71 - 85% Developed Surface
6. 86 - 100% Developed Surface
7. Single-Family Residential Parcels
(flat rate per residential parcel)
Service Charge Per Acre
Current Proposed Proposed
2020 2021 2022
$ 229.54 $ 234.12 $ 245.82
$ 499.16 $ 509.14 $ 534.60
$ 914.88 $ 933.18 $ 979.84
$1,365.18 $1,392.48 $1,462.10
$1,644.64 $1,677.52 $1,761.40
$1,918.50 $1,956.86 $2,054.70
$ 190.00 $ 194.00 $ 204.00
SURFACE WATER INTEREST CHARGE RATE
On all surface water accounts 30 days in arrears
from the date of delinquency until paid 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY TEST FEE SCHEDULE
Fees for Residential and Lodging Use
UNIT ALL TYPES OF
RESIDENTIAL 1
ROOMS2 HOTEL/MOTEL
Between 1 and 3 $400 40 and under $3,000
Between 4 and 5 $500 Between 41 and 60 $4,800
Between 6 and 10 $900 Between 61 and 80 $6,800
Between 11 and 15 $1,500 Between 81 and 100 $8,500
Between 16 and 20 $2,100 Between 101 and 120 $10,500
Between 21 and 25 $2,600 Between 121 and 150 $12,800
Between 26 and 30 $3,200 Between 151 and 180 $24,800
Between 31 and 40 $4,000 Between 181 and 220 $30,000
Between 41 and 60 $5,700 Between 220 and 260 $36,000
Greater than 60 $6,800 Between 261 and 300 $46,000
Greater than 300 $49,800
1 All residential uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 200-299, including single family,
multi-family, mobile home parks, and shared housing
2 All lodging uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 300-399, including all hotels and
motels.
177
W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transportation fees 9-22-20
GL:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 5 of 6
Fees for Non-Residential Use
GROSS FLOOR AREA
INDUSTRIAL3
OFFICE4
RETAIL5
EATERY6
INSTITU-
TIONAL
& PORT7
Less than 5,000
$ 800 $ 800 $ 4,500 $ 3,500 $ 300
Between 5,001 and 10,000 $ 1,500
$ 2,200 $10,000 $10,500 $ 800
Between 10,001 and 20 ,000 $ 2,500 $ 4,300 $16,700 $20,900 $ 1,600
Between 20,001 and 30,000
$ 3,500 $ 6,900 $24,400
$21,000 $ 2,600
Between 30 ,001 and 40,000 $ 8,300 $ 9,500 $31,300 $21,000 $ 3,600
Between 40,001 and 50 ,000 $ 7,000 $12,000 $37,700 $21,000 $ 4,700
Between 50,001 and 70 ,000 $ 9,500 $15,800 $46,600 $21,000 $ 6,200
Between 70,001 and 90,000
$12,500
$20,800
$57,600
$21,000 $ 8,200
Between 90,001 and 150,000 $19,000 $32,900 $77,800 $21,000 $13,400
Between 150,001 and
200,000 $27,500 $43,600 $85,000 $21,000 $18,000
Greater than 200,000 $31,500 $49,500 $95,000 $21,000
$20,500
All other uses are charged a $250 per PM peak hour trip.
3 All industrial/agricultural uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 100-199, including
light and heavy industrial, manufacturing, and warehousing
4 All office, medical, and service-related uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes
600-699, 700-799, and 900-999, including general office, medical facilities, and banks
5 All retail and recreation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 400-499, 800-830
and 837-899, including retail sales, rental sales, athletic clubs, and theaters
6 All food service uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 930-940, excluding accessory
(stand-alone) drive-through espresso stands (or similar) under 250 sq. ft., which are assessed $400
7 All institutional and transportation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 000-099 and
500-599, including schools, places of worship, day care, terminals, and transit
178
W:\Word Processing\Resolutions\PW fee sched-utility and transportation fees 9-22-20
GL:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 6 of 6
POLE ATTACHMENT FEES FEE PER YEAR
Pole Attachment (per pole) Natural .....................
Pole revisions to allow for attachments ...............
Conduit Rental ....................................................
City Dark Fiber Rental .........................................
Installation fees ...................................................
$100.00 per year
Actual costs (engineering, labor, inspections, etc.)
$1.00 per foot per year
$200.00 per strand per mile per year
Actual costs (engineering, labor, inspections, etc.)
Section 2. Repealer. Resolution No. 1945 is hereby repealed.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this ______________ day of ______________________,
2020.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk De’Sean Quinn, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
Office of the City Attorney
179