Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit D16-0310 - RWC GROUP - PARKING COVERRWC GROUP 13123 48 AVE S D16-0310 Parcel No: Address: Project Name: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Inspection Request Line: 206-438-9350 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 0003000116 Permit Number: D16-0310 13123 48TH AVE S RWC GROUP Issue Date: 1/6/2017 Permit Expires On: 7/5/2017 Owner: Name: Address: Contact Person: Name: Address: Contractor: Name: Address: License No: Lender: Name: Address: DEM LLC 13123 48TH AVE S ATTN: MCDEVITT M D, SEATTLE, WA, 98168 ROWLAND CUNNINGHAM 13123 48 AVE S , TUKWILA, WA, 98168 GREG SULLIVAN CONCRETE 3413 SPORTSMAN WAY, HELENA, MT, 59602 G REGSSC903QN CBIC 3101 WESTERN AVE #100 , SEATTLE, WA, 98121 Phone: (206) 433-3466 Phone: (406) 459-9715 Expiration Date: 11/10/2018 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: INSTALL NEW PARKING SHADE FOR MECHANICS Project Valuation: $100,000.00 Type of Fire Protection: Sprinklers: Fire Alarm: Type of Construction: VB Electrical Service Provided by: TUKWILA Fees Collected: $2,577.02 Occupancy per IBC: U Water District: TUKWILA Sewer District: TUKWILA Current Codes adopted by the City of Tukwila: International Building Code Edition: International Residential Code Edition: International Mechanical Code Edition: Uniform Plumbing Code Edition: International Fuel Gas Code: 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 National Electrical Code: WA Cities Electrical Code: WAC 296-46B: WA State Energy Code: 2014 2014 2014 2015 Public Works Activities: Channelization/Striping: Curb Cut/Access/Sidewalk: Fire Loop Hydrant: Flood Control Zone: Hauling/Oversize Load: Land Altering: Volumes: Cut: 0 Fill: 0 Landscape Irrigation: Sanitary Side Sewer: Number: 0 Sewer Main Extension: Storm Drainage: Street Use: Water Main Extension: Water Meter: No SitPermit Center Authorized Signature: Date: qmp� J I hearby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. I am authorized to sign and obtain this development permit and agree to the conditions attached to this permit. Signature: Print Name: s nine/02 Date: This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days for the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. PERMIT CONDITIONS: 1: ***BUILDING PERMIT CONDITIONS*** 2: Work shall be installed in accordance with the approved construction documents, and any changes made during construction that are not in accordance with the approved construction documents shall be resubmitted for approval. 3: All permits, inspection record card and approved construction documents shall be kept at the site of work and shall be open to inspection by the Building Inspector until final inspection approval is granted. 4: All construction shall be done in conformance with the Washington State Building Code and the Washington State Energy Code. 5: Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 6: There shall be no occupancy of a building until final inspection has been completed and approved by Tukwila building inspector. No exception. 7: VALIDITY OF PERMIT: The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the building code or of any other ordinances of the City of Tukwila. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the code or other ordinances of the City of Tukwila shall not be valid. The issuance of a permit based on construction documents and other data shall not prevent the Building Official from requiring the correction of errors in the construction documents and other data. 8: Advisory: Tukwila Municipal Code Table 18-6 requires all automobile services including engine and body repair to be enclosed within a building. PERMIT INSPECTIONS REQUIRED Permit Inspection Line: (206) 438-9350 1700 BUILDING FINAL** 0201 FOOTING 0409 FRAMING CITY OF TUKWILA Community Development Department Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Building Permit No. Nip — 0 -i 0 Project No. Date Application Accepted: 11-11-1-10 Date Application Expires: cj —114 - 7 (For office use only) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. **Please Print** SITE LOCATION site Address: 13123 48th Ave S, Seattle WA 98168 King Co Assessor's Tax No.: Suite Number: New Tenant: Tenant Name: RWC GROUP PROPERTY OWNER Name: Rowland Cunningham Name: Mike McDevitt Cin': Seattle State: WA Zip: 98168 Address: 27801 1877th Ave SE Email: rowland@rwcgroup.com City: Kent State: WA Zip: 98042 CONTACT PERSON — person receiving all project communication Name: Rowland Cunningham Address: 13123 48th Ave, S Cin': Seattle State: WA Zip: 98168 Phone: (206) 433-3466 Fax: Email: rowland@rwcgroup.com GENERAL CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Greg Sullivan Concrete Address: 3413 Sportsmans Way City: Helena State: MT zip: 59602 Phone: (406) 459-9715 Fax: Contr Reg No.: 603062776 Exp Date: 11/10/2018 Tukwila Business License No.: GREGSSC903QN H:Uppliestiom\Fmm -Appliatiom On Line \ 201Applications\Pemvt Application Revised - 8-9-11.doa Revised: August 2011 bb Floor: El Yes ❑ ..No ARCHITECT OF RECORD Name: CBIC Company Name: Shade N net of AZ City: Seattle State: WA Zip: 98121 Architect Name: John E Skwiot Address: 5711 W Washington ST City: Phoenix State: AZ Zip: 85043 Phone:(602) 484-7911 Fax: Email: John@shade-n-net.com ENGINEER OF RECORD Name: CBIC Company Name: Shad N net of AZ City: Seattle State: WA Zip: 98121 Engineer Name: John E Skwiot Address: 5711 W Washington ST City: Phoenix State: AZ Zip: 85043 Phone: (602) 484-7911 Fax: Email: John@shade-n-net.com LENDER/BOND ISSUED (required for projects $5,000 or greater per RCW 19.27.095) Name: CBIC Address: 3101 Western Ave # 300 City: Seattle State: WA Zip: 98121 Page 1 of 4 BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION 206-431-3670 Valuation of Project (contractor's bid price): $ 100,000 Existing Building Valuation: $ 5,000,000 Describe the scope of work (please provide detailed information): l New pa//c, f S4‘ 46 Will there be new rack storage? ❑ Yes 0.. No If yes, a separate permit and plan submittal will be required. Provide All Building Areas in Square Footage Below PLANNING DIVISION: Single family building footprint (area of the foundation of all structures, plus any decks over 18 inches and overhangs greater than 18 inches) *For an Accessory dwelling, provide the following: Lot Area (sq ft): Floor area of principal dwelling: Floor area of accessory dwelling: *Provide documentation that shows that the principal owner lives in one of the dwellings as his or her primary residence. Number of Parking Stalls Provided: Standard: Compact: Handicap: Will there be a change in use? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", explain: FIRE PROTECTION/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: ❑ Sprinklers ❑ Automatic Fire Alarm 0 None ❑ Other (specify) Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials in the building? ❑ Yes 0 No If "yes', attach list of materials and storage locations on a separate 8-1/2" x 11" paper including quantities and Material Safety Data Sheets. SEPTIC SYSTEM 0 On-site Septic System — For on-site septic system, provide 2 copies of a current septic design approved by King County Health Department. H:Wpplications\Forms-Applications On Line 201 I Applications\Permit Application Revised - 8-9-11.docx Revised: August 2011 bh Page 2 of 4 Existing Interior Remodel Addition to Existing Structure New Type of Construction per IBC Type of Occupancy per IBC 1' Floor rd Floor 3rd Floor Floors thru Basement Accessory Structure* Attached Garage Detached Garage Attached Carport Detached Carport Covered Deck Uncovered Deck PLANNING DIVISION: Single family building footprint (area of the foundation of all structures, plus any decks over 18 inches and overhangs greater than 18 inches) *For an Accessory dwelling, provide the following: Lot Area (sq ft): Floor area of principal dwelling: Floor area of accessory dwelling: *Provide documentation that shows that the principal owner lives in one of the dwellings as his or her primary residence. Number of Parking Stalls Provided: Standard: Compact: Handicap: Will there be a change in use? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", explain: FIRE PROTECTION/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: ❑ Sprinklers ❑ Automatic Fire Alarm 0 None ❑ Other (specify) Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials in the building? ❑ Yes 0 No If "yes', attach list of materials and storage locations on a separate 8-1/2" x 11" paper including quantities and Material Safety Data Sheets. SEPTIC SYSTEM 0 On-site Septic System — For on-site septic system, provide 2 copies of a current septic design approved by King County Health Department. H:Wpplications\Forms-Applications On Line 201 I Applications\Permit Application Revised - 8-9-11.docx Revised: August 2011 bh Page 2 of 4 Value of Construction — In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review — Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The Building Official may grant one or more extensions of time for additional periods not exceeding 90 days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. Section 105.3.2 International Building Code (current edition). I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. BUILDING OWNER. A o i ORME A NT: Signature'✓����'' Print Name: M M. Date: k%I M. 11(.) tc e -u;• Day Telephone:.5oq 3 70 Al Ct Mailing Address: 1 IS N K‘AV A }v h H:Uppliexim APonna-Appiieatiem on Li1e\2011 /pplkatioas\Pmnk Application Revised- 89-01.doex Revised: Angnst2011 a, L.:),QaA-4 1..ake_ W cjctc) c\ City state Zip Page 4 of 4 PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT INFORMATION — 206-433-0179 Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Shade awning out the outside of the shop to keep mechanics out of the weather. Call before you Dig: 811 Please refer to Public Works Bulletin #1 for fees and estimate sheet. Water District ❑ ...Tukwila ❑ ...Water District #125 ❑ ...Water Availability Provided Sewer District ❑ ...Tukwila ❑ ...Sewer Use Certificate 0 .. Highline ❑ ... Valley View 0 .. Renton ❑ ...Sewer Availability Provided ❑ .. Renton ❑ .. Seattle Septic System: ❑ On-site Septic System — For on-site septic system, provide 2 copies of a current septic design approved by King County Health Department. Submitted with Application (mark boxes which apply): ❑ ...Civil Plans (Maximum Paper Size — 22" x 34") ❑ ...Technical Information Report (Storm Drainage) 0 .. Geotechnical Report ❑ ...Bond 0 .. Insurance 0 .. Easement(s) 0 .. Maintenance Agreement(s) Proposed Activities (mark boxes that apply): 0 ...Right-of-way Use - Nonprofit for less than 72 hours ❑ ...Right-of-way Use - No Disturbance ❑ ...Construction/Excavation/Fill - Right-of-way ❑ Non Right-of-way ❑ ...Total Cut ❑ ...Total Fill cubic yards cubic yards ❑ ...Sanitary Side Sewer ❑ ...Cap or Remove Utilities 0 ...Frontage Improvements ❑ ...Traffic Control ❑ ...Backflow Prevention - Fire Protection Irrigation Domestic Water ❑. ❑. ❑. ❑. ❑ ...Traffic Impact Analysis ❑ ...Hold Harmless — (SAO) ❑ ...Hold Harmless — (ROW) ❑ .. Right-of-way Use - Profit for less than 72 hours ❑ .. Right-of-way Use — Potential Disturbance O .. Work in Flood Zone ❑ .. Storm Drainage . Abandon Septic Tank . Curb Cut . Pavement Cut . Looped Fire Line ❑ ...Permanent Water Meter Size... ❑ ...Temporary Water Meter Size .. ❑ ...Water Only Meter Size 0 ...Sewer Main Extension Public 0 ❑ ...Water Main Extension Public 0 ❑ .. Grease Interceptor ❑ .. Channelization ❑ .. Trench Excavation ❑ .. Utility Undergrounding WO # WO # WO # 0 ...Deduct Water Meter Size Private ❑ Private 0 FINANCE INFORMATION Fire Line Size at Property Line 0 ...Water ❑ ...Sewer Monthly Service Billing to: Name: Number of Public Fire Hydrant(s) 0 ...Sewage Treatment Day Telephone: Mailing Address: City State Zip Water Meter Refund/Billing: Name: Mailing Address: Day Telephone: City State Zip H:\Applications\Forms-Applications On Line\201 I Applications\Permit Application Revised - 8-9-1 1 .docx Revised: August 2011 bb Page 3 of 4 Cash Register Receipt City of Tukwila DESCRIPTIONS PermitTRAK I ACCOUNT I QUANTITY I PAID $1,593.41 D16-0310 Address: 13123 48TH AVE S Apn: 0003000116 $1,593.41 DEVELOPMENT $1,517.75 PERMIT FEE R000.322.100.00.00 0.00 $1,513.25 WASHINGTON STATE SURCHARGE 13640.237.114 0.00 $4.50 TECHNOLOGY FEE $75.66 TECHNOLOGY FEE TOTAL FEES PAID BY RECEIPT: R10018 R000.322.900.04.00 0.00 $75.66 $1,593.41 Date Paid: Monday, December 12, 2016 Paid By: RWC GROUP Pay Method: CREDIT CARD 019692 Printed: Monday, December 12, 2016 3:32 PM 1 of 1 0 I SYSTEMS Cash Register Receipt City of Tukwila DESCRIPTIONS ACCOUNT QUANTITY PAID PermitTRAK $983.61 D16-0310 Address: 13123 48TH AVE S Apn: 0003000116 $983.61 DEVELOPMENT $983.61 PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEES PAID BY RECEIPT: R9850 R000.345.830.00.00 0.00 $983.61 $983.61 Date Paid: Monday, November 14, 2016 Paid By: ROLAND CUNNINGHAM Pay Method: CREDIT CARD 034015 Printed: Monday, November 14, 2016 1:20 PM 1 of 1 rSYSTEMS a INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION y; -o io 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila. WA 98188 Permit Inspection Request Line (206) 438-9350 (206) 431-3670 Pro' ct: 1= i 1C 6 .. tit° Type of Inspection, EuhtbiAZ ,-0/4 L Adddress:� /3/23 7A'( S Date Called: Special Instructions: • Date 1?d: Reque er. JJ Phone No: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: fi -44 - Inspector: Date: Ai.3 a 7 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to next inspection. fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd.. Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit SPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila. WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 Permit Inspection Request Line (206) 438-9350 P -®5/eb Project: Rive Type of Inspection: roorm 6 - Address: /3/23 18 S AV S. Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted:J� f a m. �n . Requester: Phone No: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. OMMENTS: Inspector: Date -24 —1 7 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to next inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd.. Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. NEW SERV CE CANOPY GROUP The innacle Consulting Group, Inc. Industrial Engineering Consultants and Facility Planners 13123 - 4:th Ave. S. SEATTLE, WA 98168 AUGUST 19. 2016 NGHAM WASHINGTON EVERETT SEATTLE REDMOND NORTH W E UKWILA OMA OLYMPIA EXISTING LOCATION (TUKWILA) 13123 - 48th Ave. S. SEATTLE, WA 98168 PROJECT NO: 4768.00, Issued: 08/19/2016 PREPARED BY: PINNACLE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. PARCEL NUMBERS: 000300-0109 & 000300-0116 OCCUPANCY COMMERCIAL ZONING C/LI COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DRAWING INDEX SHEET NO. PINNACLE NO. SHEET TITLE 1 IP -00 COVER SHEET 2 SITE -01 VICINITY MAP, SITE SUMMARY, E\ISTING FACILITY SITE PLAN 3 BLDG -01 NEW FREE—STANDING SERVICE NEW FREE-STANDING SERVICE 1CAN/WFOR CANOPY COORDINATION PLAN RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA 4 BLDG -02 COE)E COMPLIANCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEC 0 9 2016 P s „� PERMIT CENTER 1tY cit 1 ulcwlla FOSTER STEPHEN—[9 C # 38 POR OF DC IN NE 1/4 OF STR 15-23-04DB BIEMOINGiENNISION 99.17 FT FR MON IN C/L OF DUWAMISH—RENTON JCT RD WCH MON IS APPRO\ 1200 FT N & 440 O STR TH S 40-36-00 W 20 FT TO NELY LN OF FORMER PSE RY R/W TH N 49-24-00 W ALG SD NELY LN 16 FT TO TPOB TH CONTG N 49-24-00 W ALG SD NELY LN 310.21 FT TH N 40-36-00 E 450 FT TH S 49-24-00 E 310.21 FT TH S 40-36-00.W 450 FT TO TPOB LESS SWLY 150 FT LESS CO RD. TOGETHER WITH: FOSTER STEPHEN DC # 38 & POR LEWIS C C DC # 37 BAAP WCH BEARS N 40-01-05 W 920.15 FT FR A MONUMENT AT P I OF A CURVE ON C/L DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION RD SD P I BEING APPRO\ 1000 FT E 20 FT S OF 1/4 COR BTW SECS 14 & 15-23-4 TH N 49-24-00 W 150 FT DIST FR & PLW C/L SD DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION RD 835 FT TAP WCH BEARS N 81-44-15 E 199.17 FT FR MONUMENT AT THE END OF A CURVE ON C/L SD DUWAMISH RENTON JUNCTION RD SD END OF A CURVE APPRO\ 1200 FT N & 440 FT W OF 1/4 COR BTW SECS 14 & 15 TH N 49-24-00 W 16 FT TH N 40-36-00 E 682.10 FT TH N 40-24-00 W 310.21 FT TO TPOB TH S 40-36-00 W 552.10 FT TH N 49-24-00 W 52.08 FT TH S 40-36-00 W 150 FT TO NELY MGN OF R/W OF PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY TH N 49-24-00 W ALG SD MGN OF R/W 30 FT TH N 40-26-00 E 150 FT TH N 49-24-00 W 172 FT TH N 40-26-00 E 552.10 FT TH S 49-24-00 E 254.08 FT TO TPOB CCY yRECTON N&o3Io RWG GROUP — SEATTLE WA FACILITY PLANNING — PAGE 1 FREE-STANDING RVICE CANOPY x183' (3,360 SF) EXISTING FACILITY SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 100'-0" PROJECT NO: 4768.00, Issued: 08/19/2016 PREPARED BY: PINNACLE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 50' 0' 50' 100' 150' 200' 250' 1" = 100' NOTES: 1. SITE INFORMATION DERIVED FROM ATWOOD GROVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. DRAWINGS DATED 8/14/1974. REFER TO LATEST CIVIL DOCUMENTATION. VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. LEGEND EllOFFICE • WAREHOUSE ElSHOP NORTH SITE SUMMARY SITE ACREAGE EXISTING BUILDING—A OFFICE PARTS SVICE BUILDING—A SUBTOTAL CUSTOMER CAR PARKING EMPLOYEE CAR PARKING TRUCK SALES PARKING TRAILER PARKING TRACTOR PARKING OTHER CAR PARKING +5.3 ACRES 7,838 SF 10,392 SF 14,310 SF 32,4502 SF 31 STALLS 25 STALLS 14 STALLS 17 STALLS 84 STALLS 18 STALLS REVIEVVED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVED DEC 0 9 2016 BUILDING DIVISION SION RECEIVE® CITY OF TUKWILA DEC 012016 PERMIT CENTER RWG GROUP — SEATTLE WA FACILITY PLANNING — PAGE 2 NEW FREE-STANDING SERVICE CANOPY 20'xl 83' u 0 0 0183'-0„0 ® D 1 0 N PARTS WHSE. H M OFFICES 17 REVIEWED FOR 'CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVED DEC 0 9 2016 it 6. c�. NEW CANOPY/AWNING COORDINATION PLAN SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0” PROJECT NO: 4768.00, Issued: 08/19/2016 PREPARED BY: PINNACLE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. GRAPHIC SCALE 16' 0' 16' 32' 48' 64' 80' ME MINNIE 111111•1111111 MIMI 111111M11111 MESE 1 /32"=1'-0" City of Tukwila BUILDING DIVISION NORTH RECEIVED ITY OF TUKWILA DEC 012016 PERMIT CENTER RWG GROUP — SEATTLE WA FACILITY PLANNING — PAGE 3 NEW WATER REPELLENT CANVAS N N 5'-0" 15'-0" NEW CANOPY SUPPORT BEAM +20'-0" BUILDING HEIGHT NEW CANOPY SUPPORT COLUMN ce 0 0 0 0 0 N NEW PROTECTIVE BOLLARD (OPTIONAL) NEW FREE STANDING SERVICE CANOPY SECTION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0" CLEARANCE 4' 2' GRAPHIC SCALE 0' 4' 8' 12' 16' INIIIIMI 3/16"=1'-0" 1 w' 2 -J a w 0 REVIEWED FOR )DE COMPLIANCE APPROVED DEC 092016 City of Tukwila BUILDING DIVISION RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA DEC 012016 PERMIT CENTER PROJECT NO: 4768.00, Issued: 08/19/2016 •RWG GROUP — SEATTLE WA PREPARED BY: PINNACLE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FACILITY PLANNING — PAGE 4 REV ED ECR co4 ttivt4ovLb DEC I 44 HEAVY DUTY ARCHITECTURAL SHADE FABRIC Lit,cxyrn WORLDS LEADING ARCHITECHTURAL SHADE FABRIC ID 100% LEAD AND PHTHALATE FREE fl BLOCKS UP TO 98.8% OF HARMFUL UV RAYS 0 100% RECYCLABLE 0 10 YEAR MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY 0 CC: );FIECTION LTH# 77(17 abncs W ILA Advanced APe IREEApnod. 2016 Commercial 95TM - the standard in outdoor durability is now 100% LEAD AND PHTHALATE FREE! • Heavy duty, professional grade architectural shade fabric for tensioned structures and other shade applications. • Made from UV stabilized HDPE monofilament and tape yarns. • Specialized lock stitch knit for more air movement and better channeling of cooling breezeways. • Constructed to block up to 98.8% of harmful UV sun rays. • Heat set for ease of fabrication and to limit shrinkage. • Fade and tear resistant; will not crack, rot or fray. • 10 year manufacturer's warranty against UV degradation. Natural #445003 Desert Sand #444983 Yellow #445072 Cayenne #455255 Deep Ochre #444990 Gun Metal #455262 Steel Grey #445041 Cherry Red #444976 Navy Blue #445010 Turquoise #445065 Rivergum #445027 Colors are representative ony. Small variations in color should be antidpated and are within commercial tolerances. Gale Pacific USA Inc. 285 West Central Parkway, Suite 1704 Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 USA Tel: 1-407-772-7979 • www.synthesisfabricusa.com Aquatic Blue #444938 Sky Blue #445034 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Property Test Method US Metric Weight ASTMD-3776 10.0oz 340gsm Thickness ASTM D-5199 61 mils 1.6 mm Tensile Strength ASTM 0-5034 (grab test) Warp: 208 Ibs Weft:486lbs Warp: 925 N Weft:2161 N Elongation ASTM D-5034 (grab test) Warp: 134% Weft 94% Warp: 134% Weft: 94% Tear Strength ASTM D-2261 (tongue test) Warp: 51 lbs Weft: 52lbs Warp: 227 N Weft 231 N Burst Pressure (Mullen) ASTM D-3786 (diaphragm test) 487 psi 3358 kPa Burst Strength ASTM 0-3787 (ball burst test) 353 lbs 1570 N Temperature Range 455262 -22°F to +167°F -30°C to +75°C Lead & Phthalate Tests Result Lead -All Colors PASS CPSIA Section 10I(a)(2) Not Detected Phthalate PASS CPSIA Section 108 Not Detected Flammability Tests* Result ASTM E84, Class A PASS -Hanle spread index 25 -Smoke developed index 105 Specification US Metric Width** 8ft 10in 2.7 m Length 131 ft 40m Roll Weight 110 lbs 50 kg Roll Diameter 16 in 0.40 m Core Diameter 1.4 in 35 mm 'Tea Results available upon request "Note product is not center folded when SHADE AND LNR Color PROPERTIES Code CoverFactor Avg% Transmission Shade Factor Avg.UVR Transmission Avg. PAR Transmission %UVR Blodc Aquatic Blue 444938 96.r% 11.9% 882 5.8% 13.8% 942% Black 444945 95.9% 5.1% 94.9 4.9% 5.1% 95.1% Brunswick Green 444952 97.4% 4.4% 95.6 3.1% 4.8% 96.9% Gun Metal 455262 97.1% 3.8% 962 23% 3.9% 97.7% Chevy Red 444976 94.9% 19.0% 81.0 9.0% 21.9% 91.0% Deep Ochre 444990 95.4% 5.6% 94.4 3.3% 62% 96.7% Desert Sand 444983 965% 15.8% 842 52% 19.0% 948% Natural 445003 943% 21.1% 78.9 4.9% 25.9% 95.1% Navy Blue 445010 96.4% 4.3% 95.7 32% 4.r% 98.8% Rivergum 445027 95.7% 142% 859 7.0% 16.3% 93.0% Sky Blue 445034 952% 5.3% 94.7 32% 5.9% %9% Steel Grey 445041 97.3% 8.1% 91.9 3.3% 9.5% 96.r% Cayenne 455255 920% 13.0% 87.0 6.0% 11.6% 94.0% Turquoise 445065 97k% 10.4% 89.6 4.6% 122% 954% Yellow 445072 94.6% 23.0% 77.0 6.r% 27.7% 932% Tested according to AS 4174 synthetic shadecloth: Avg %transmission =Average %transmission within the 290-770nm spectrum. Avg UVRtransmission =Average %transmission within the 290-400nm spectrum. Avg PAR transmission = Average %transmission within the 408-770nm spectrum. Suggested Specification Shadecloth fabric shall be compliant to Australian standard AS 4174 and shall be Synthesis Commercial 95 knitted HDPE monofilament & tape (with LDPE coating) water proof shade fabric offering a UVR block up to 97.7%. Brunswick Green Black Usage Instructions #444952 #444945 Do not use against flames. Contact with organic solvents, halogens or highly acidic substances may reduce the service life of the fabric and void the warranty. Biaxial elastic material properties available on request. The above results are typical averages from independent testing and quality assurance testing and are not to be taken as a minimum specification nor as forming any contract between Gale Pacific and another party. Due to continuous product improvement, technical specifications are subject to alteration without notice. Notice: As the use and disposal of this product are beyond Gale Pacific's control, regardless of any assistance provided without charge, Gale Pacific assumes no obligation or liability for the suitability of its products in any specific end use application. Itis the customer's responsibility to determine whether Gale Pacific's products are appropriate for the specific application and complies with any legal and patent regulations. Synthesis® and Commercial 95TM are registered trademarks of Gale Pacific Limited. All rights reserved. MME SGS CLIENT: r ' L TEST REPORT Gale Pacific USA, Inc. 285 W. Central Pkwy, Suite 1704 Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 Attn: Susan Yuskaitis REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVED DEC 092016 City of Tukwila BUILDING DIVISION Test Report No: 654:030608 Date: February 22, 2010 SUBJECT: SAMPLE ID: Testing to ASTM E-84 Sample identified as "Commercial 95" was received from the client on 2/19/10 in good condition. The sample was described by the manufacturer of containing the following items: • Sample Description: Commercial 95 • Sample / Style Number: Commercial 95 • Material Content: Knitted HDPE • Client PO: SY021609 RECEIVED ILA DEC 01 2016 TEST REQUESTED: Perform standard flame spread and smoke density developed cFEr sample supplied by the Client in accordance with ASTM Designation E84 -09a, "Staniar l Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials", The test procedure is equivalent to UL 723, ANSI/NFPA No. 255, and UBC No. 8-1. PREPARATION: The sample material was submitted in one roll and trimmed to fit dimensions of tunnel, measuring 21" by 24'. The sample was supported using rods and wire. 2/22/10 Results can be found on the following pages and apply only to the sample tested. The sample received a `Class A' rating in accordance with the NFPA and IBC classification chart on page two of this report. TEST DATE: RESULTS: CLASSIFICATION: CORRECTION LTR# SIGNED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SGS U.S. TESTING COMPANY INC. reg Ertel J. Brian McDonald Engineering Technician Fire Technology Department Manager Page 1 of 5 This document is issued by the Company subject to its General Conditions of Service printed overleaf, available on request or accessible at www.sas.com/terms and conditions.htm and, for electronic format documents, subject to Terms and Conditions for Electronic Documents at www.sas.comlterms e- document.htm. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. This document cannot be reproduced except in full, without prior written approval of the Company. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Unless otherwise stated the results shown in this test report refer. nl6to thelsaimpl%$),re tel tEMOMEOKEnm AS 3.1(05 n4'ienue, Tulsa, OK 74116 t )918) 437-8333 f (918) 437-8487 www.sgs.com Member of the SGS Group Client: Gale Pacific USA, Inc. Report No.: 654:030608 RESULTS: SAMPLE: Commercial 95 TEST DATE: 2/22/09 DATA: Ignition (minutes: seconds) 00:06 Flame Spread Flame Front (feet) 4.0 Time to Maximum Spread (minutes: seconds) 7:00 A Flame Spread 15 < 450 Smoke Developed 50 26 through 75 NFPA Class IBC Class Flame Spread Smoke Developed A A 0 through 25 < 450 B B 26 through 75 < 450 C C 76 through 200 < 450 Total Test Time, (hr:min:sec): 0:10:00 Building Codes Cited: 1. National Fire Protection Association, ANSI/NFPA No. 101, "Life Safety Code", 2006 Edition. 2. International Building Code, 2006 Edition, Chapter 8, interior Finishes, Section 803 Observations: • Floor Burning • Flaming / Dripping • Melting Page2of5 This document is issued by the Company subject to its General Conditions of Service printed overleaf, available on request or accessible at www.sos.com/terms and conditions.htnl and, for electronic format documents, subject to Terms and Conditions for Electronic Documents at www.sas.com/terms e- document.htm. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. This document cannot be reproduced except in full, without prior written approval of the Company. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Unless otherwise stated the results shown In this test report refer only to the sample(s) tested and such sample(s) are retained for 90 days only. GRAPHICAL RESULTS: 23 18- m LL_ m 13 2 a N co E LL Flame Spread Chart Test Sample Red Oak • FSI Line Client: Gale Pacific USA, Inc. Report No.: 654:030608 30 Bumers at 4 ft. 1 — 2 -- - 3 b- -.. Time (Minutes) FIGURE 1. Flame Spread -7 ---9--- ---- 10 Page 3 of 5 This document is issued by the Company subject to its General Conditions of Service printed overleaf, available on request or accessible at www.sas.com/terms and conditions.htm and, for electronic format documents, subject to Terms and Conditions for Electronic Documents at www.sos.com/terms e- document.htm. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. This document cannot be reproduced except in full, without prior written approval of the Company. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Unless otherwise stated the results shown in this test report refer only to the sample(s) tested and such sample(s) are retained for 90 days only. GRAPHICAL RESULTS: (Cont.) Light Absorption (%) 100 80 -- 60- 40 -- 20 - Test Sample Red Oak Client: Gale Pacific USA, Inc. Report No.: 654:030608 Smoke Developed Chart 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (minutes) 6 FIGURE 2. Smoke Developed 7 8 9 10 Page 4 of 5 This document is issued by the Company subject to its General Conditions of Service printed overleaf, available on request or accessible at www.sas-com/terms and conditions.htm and, for electronic format documents, subject to Terms and Conditions for Electronic Documents atwww.sos.com/terms e- document.htm. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits of Clients instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. This document cannot be reproduced except in full, without prior written approval of the Company. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Unless otherwise stated the results shown in this test report refer only to the sample(s) tested and such sample(s) are retained for 90 days only. SGS GRAPHICAL RESULTS: (Cont.) Temperature (deg. F) 1260 Client: Gale Pacific USA, Inc. Report No.: 654:030608 Temperature - Time Curve 1050 - 850 - 6 450 250 Test Sample Red Oak 50 0 3 $ 6 7 8 9 111 Time (minutes) FIGURE 3. Temperature — 24 ft. Air Stream Thermocouple ******** End of Report Page 5 of 5 This document is issued by the Company subject to its General Conditions of Service printed overleaf, available on request or accessible at www.sgs.comlterms and conditions.htm and, for electronic format documents, subject to Terms and Conditions for Electronic Documents at www.sgs.comlterms e- document.htm. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the Company's findings at the time of its intervention only and within the limits of Client's instructions, if any. The Company's sole responsibility is to its Client and this document does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction documents. This document cannot be reproduced except in full, without prior written approval of the Company. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Unless otherwise stated the results shown in this test report refer only to the sample(s) tested and such sample(s) are retained for 90 days only. CALCULATIONS FOR SHADE CANOPIES RWC GROUP TUKWILA, WA September 24, 2016 Total page count = 52 (including cover) Pages included: • Wind • Cable • Allowable Snow Load Calculations • Seismic Weight Determination • Cantilever Models and Results • Base Plate Anchorage • Base Plate Design • Drilled Piers REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVED DEC 0 9 2016 City of Tukwila BUILDING DIVISION b11 0310 CITY OFF TU (WILA NOV 14 2016 PERMIT CENTER WIND CALCULATIONS Gust Effect Factor (ASCE 7-10 Section 26.9.1)) 23 Sep 2016 15:10:59 - 1.Wind_Calcs_ASCE 7-10-1 c.sm RWC Canopies Wind Load Calculations References: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)."Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures", Version 7-10. Input data: Basic Wind Speed (ASCE 7-10 Figure 26.5-1A) V= 110 mph 'Occupancy Category II 'Wind Directionality Factor (ASCE 7-10 Table 26.6-1) Kd= 0.85 Topographic Factor (ASCE 7-10 Section 26.8.2) Kzt=1.0 (Surface Roughness Category B 'Enclosure Type Velocity Pressure Coefficient (ASCE 7-10 Table 27.3-1) K z=0.57 G= 0.85 Case A: Open Net Pressure Coefficient (Windward Roof Half - ASCE 7-10 Figure 27.4-4) CN_ww_roof 1.2 Net Pressure Coefficient (Leeward Roof Half - ASCE 7-10 Figure 27.4-4) CN lw roof 0.3 Velocity pressure qz= V215.01 2 = 15.01 psf Roof Windward design wind pressure ppos=1.0qz• G• CN ww roof 15.3 psf Leeward design wind pressure pneg =1.0•gz•G•CN - lw -roof 3.827 psf Exposure Category B Use 15 psf design positive windward pressure for roof 1/2 23 Sep 2016 15:10:59 - 1.Wind_Calcs_ASCE 7-10-1c.sm Net -.Preisure Coefficient (Windward Roof -Half - ASCE 7,71 0 Figure -27 . 4-4) c =- 1 . 1 N_ww_roof Net 'Pressure Coefficient',(Lee-ward Roof,'Half - ASCE'7710 Figure27 '4=4) 0.1 Nlwroof Velocity pressure gz= 0.00256-Kz•Kzt•Kd•V2= 15.01 psf Win-dwarcrdesign wind'PressUre P = 1 O. q • G =- • C 14 .pos z N_ww_roof LeewardLeewarddesignwind pressure psf p = 1. 0cr 1.2757 psf neg- sz. G. roof -14 psf design suction pressure for roof CABLE CALCULATIONS Maximum loading) Cable sag) 'Cable breaking strength 23 Sep 201615:18:03-2. Cable_Calcs_3.0.sm } WC Canopies Cable Calculations References: Hibbeler, R.C. "Structural Analysis", Seventh Edition. Pearson, 2009. Dead Load - Roof DLroof= 1 psf Load #1 Live Load - Roof LLroof= 5 psf 'Load #2 ,Wind Load - Roof WLroof 615 psf (Snow Load - Roof SLroof=3.5 psf p1= 1.4• DLroof- 1.4 ps f p2= 1 .2• DLroof+ 1 . 6• SLroof+ 0.5• WLroof- 14.3 psf Load #3% Load #4 + 1 . 0 SLroof- 4.7 psf P4= 1.2. DLroof+ 1.0. WLroof+ 0. 5 SLroof= 17. 9 psf p3= 1.2• DLroof Load #5 (Load #6 p 5= 1 .2• DLroof+ 0 .2 SLroof= 1.9 psf p 6= 0. 9• DLroof+ 1 . 0• WL roof= 15.9 psf Load #7 p 7= 0 . 9• DLroof= 0.9 Psf Input data: Horizontal span lspan 27 ft (Tributary area 2 Atrib 156 ft (Uniform load on cable w A • trib p load 103.4 lb load 1 ft span pload 17.9 psf scable 3.0 ft Strcable=5600 lbs Cable Loading Calculated cable tension H cable 2 wload 1span 8.5 cable 1000 -3.14 kips (Force at cable support ends (design strength) 2 (Hcable 2 10001 +It wloadlspan 2 1 -3.44 kips Fsupport 1000 'Allowable cable strength Strcable.75 kips Fallow 1000 =4.2 1/4 (Uniform dead load on cable) 23 Sep 201615:18:03-2. Cable_Calcs_3.0.sm Dead Load: Atrib DL roof lb wdead 1 - 5. 8 ft span Force at cable support ends Calculated cable tension H cable 2 wdead 1 span 8 s cable 1000 2 2 wdead 1 span (Hcable 10001 + 2 Fsupport 11000 =0.19 kips Live Load: Uniform live load on cable P' • LL trib roof lb wlive 1 - 28.9 ft span Force at cable support ends -0.18 kips Calculated cable tension H cable 2 w •1 live span 8• s cable 1000 2 [fwli.1)21 span (Hcable• 10001 + 2 Fsupport 11000 -0.96 kips Wind Load: (Uniform wind load on cable, w _ A•trib WL roof 86.7 lb wind 1 ft span Force at cable support ends Calculated cable tension Hcable 2 wwi• 1 nd span 8 s cable 1000 21 2 w • wind 1 spam ii(H 10001 + 2 J support- 11000 2.88 kips Snow Load: Uniform snow load on cable A w = trib SL roof -20.2 lb snow 1ft span Force at cable support ends Calculated cable tension 2 w 1 snow span 0.88 kips -2.63 kips 8 s cable kips H cable 1000 -0.61 P 21 2 w snow 1 span Hcable 10001 + 2 Fsupport 11000 -0.67 kips 2/4 nr daita: Horizontal span 1span= 23 ft 23 Sep 2016 15:18:03 - 2. Cable_Calcs3.0.sm Tributary area Atrin 155 ft 2 Uniform wind load on cable • w _ Atrib pload_ 120.6 lb loan 1 ft span Cable Sag, s cable_ 2 . S ft ;Gable o _ lip�g (Calculated cable tension Hcable 2 wload 1 span 8 s cable 1000 =3.19 kips Force at cable support ends (design strength)' 2 2 wload 1 span Hcable 10001 + 2 Fsupport 11000 -3.48 kips Allowable cable strength Strcable.75 kips Fallow 1000 - 4.2 Allowable strength > design strength ---> OK Use 7/32" dia. minimum cable 3/4 23 Sep 201615:18:03-2. Cable_Calcs_3.0.sm Dead Load: Uniform dead load on cable w A•trib DL roof- 6.7 lb dead 1 ft span Force at cable support ends 'Calculated cable tension H cable 2 wdead 1 span 8 s cable 1000 2 2 wdead• 1 span (Hble 10001 + 2 Fsupport 11000 0.19 kips Live Load: Uniform live load on cable lb w _ Atrib LLroof - 33.7 7 ft live 1 ft span Force at cable support ends Calculated cable tension H cable 2 w live 1 span 8 s cable 1000 fH 2 wlive lspan cable 10001 + 2 Fsupport 1000 Wind Load: Uniform wind load on cable w _ Atrib • WL roof - 101.1 1 lb wind 1 ft span Force at cable support ends -0.97 kips Calculated cable tension H cable 2 wwi• 1 nd span 8 s cable 1000 2 2 wwind • 1 span (Hcable 10001 + 2 Fsupport 11000 -2.92 kips Snow Load: Uniform snow load on cable _ Atrib SL roof _ 23. 6 lb snow ft w 1 span (Force at cable support ends Calculated cable tension H cable w 1 2 snow. span 8 s cable 1000 w •1 span 2 (Hcable 10001 + 2 snow. now 2 Fsupport 1 1000 - 0.68 kips 0.18 kips 0.89 kips = 2.67 kips 0.62 kips ALLOWABLE SNOW LOAD CALCULATINONS (Depth of snow) Exposure factor) 24 Sep 2016 17:24:08 - Snow Caics.sm RWC Canopies Snow Load Calculations American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)."Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures", Version 7-10. iItrip_u t Ma : Ground snow load p =4 g psf Roof slope factor C s=1.0 rSno iroa"ds-. (Flat roof snow load Importance Factor 1=1.0 p f= pg• 0 . 7• I• Ct• Ce= 3 .36 psf Density of snow y s= 0.13.p +14=14.52 pcf P d f snow=• 12=2.78 inches y s Thermal factor C= 1.2 Ce= 1.0 SEISMIC WEIGHT DETERMINATION RWC Model 3.0 FJS ENGINEERING, John Skwint Sep 24, 2016; 03:35 PM Result Case: D IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 CANTILEVER MODELS AND RESULTS RWC_Model_3.0 FJS ENGINEERING, John Skwiot Sep 24, 2016; 03:41 PM IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 004 RWC Madel_3.0 FJS ENGINEERING, John Skwiot Sep 24, 2016; 03:36 PM Load Case: D IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 -0./goo K RWC_Model 3.0 FJS ENGINEERING, John Skwiot Sep 24, 2016; 03:37 PM Load Case: E -Z IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 RWC Model 3.0 FJS ENGINEERING, John Skwiot Sep 24, 2016; 03:37 PM Load Case: L IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 -0,9700 RWG Model 3.0 FJS ENGINEERING, John Skwiot Sep 24, 2016; 03:38 PM Load Case: S IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 K RWC Model_3.0 FJt ENGINEERING, John Skwiot Sep 24, 2016; 03:38 PM Load Case: W+X IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 -2.920 K RWC Model 3.0 FJS ENGINEERING, John Skwiot Sep 24, 2016; 03:38 PM Design View, Unity Checks IES VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 Ungrouped Failed MEI Waming Mel 0.000 0.275 0.550 0.825 1.100 Project: RWC_Model 3.0 John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING September 24, 2016 T:\Shade n Net - SNAZ\SNAZ-16-32_RWC Canopies\04_Analysis\ Design Group Results Design Group: Steel_Beam X_G02 per AISC LRFD (2010) Designed As: HSS10x.312, Material: \SteefWSTM A500 Grade B (Fy = 42ksi) Combined Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Code Ref. Unity Check Details M001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 3.095 H1 -1b 1.04 OK KL = 23.022 ft, Cb=1.000, Lb = 23.022 ft Axial Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Demand Fx K Capacity Fx Code K Ref. Unity Details Check M001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 2.999 3.974 225.808 E3-2FB 0.02 OK Lu = 23.022 ft, KL = 23.022 ft Strong Flexure Check Member Result Name Case Offset Demand Capacity Mz Code Mz ft K -in K -in Ref. Unity Details Check M001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 3.095 -127.656 1035.720 F8-1 0.12 OK Lb = 23.022 ft, Cb = 1.000 Weak Flexure Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Demand Capacity My Code My K -in K -in Unity Details Ref. Check M001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 3.095 -937.857 1035.720 F8-1 0.91 OK Strong Shear Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Demand Vy Capacity Vy Code K K Ref. Unity Details Check M001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 2.999 0.899 100.699 G6-1, 2b 0.01 OK Weak Shear Check Member Result Name Case Offset Demand Vz Capacity Vz Code ft K K Ref. Unity Details Check M001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 2.999 -3.923 100.699 G6-1, 2b 0.04 OK Design Group: Steel_Column_Column02 per AISC LRFD (2010) Designed As: HSS10x.625, Material: \SteeIWSTM A500 Grade B (Fy = 42ksi) Members Included (2): C002, C001 Combined Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Code Ref. Unity Check Details C002 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 1.000 H1 -lb Page 1 VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 (www.iesweb.com) 0.10 OK KL = 1.000 ft, Cb=1.000, Lb = 1.000 ft Project: RWC_Model _3.0 John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING September 24, 2016 T:\Shade n Net - SNAZ\SNAZ-16-32_RWC Canopies\04_Analysis\ C001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 15.370 H1 -1b 0.84 OK KL = 13.403 ft, Cb=1.000, Lb = 15.370 ft Axial Check Member Name Result Offset Case ft Demand Fx Capacity Fx Code Unity Details K K Ref. Check C002 1.4D+.9H 1.000 1.057 649.174 C001 1.4D+.9H 15.370 2.319 563.492 E3-2FTB E3-2FB 0.00 OK 0.00 OK Lu = 1.000 ft, KL = 1.000 ft Lu = 15.370 ft, KL = 13.403 ft Strong Flexure Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Demand Capacity Mz Code Unity Mz K -in K -in Ref. Check Details C002 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 1.000 C001 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+X+30%+Z 15.370 132.953 1950.480 217.735 1950.480 F8-1 0.07 OK Lb = 1.000 ft, Cb = 1.000 F8-1 0.11 OK Lb = 15.370 ft, Cb = 1.000 Weak Flexure Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Demand Capacity My Code My K -in K -in Ref. Unity Details Check C002 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X C001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 15.370 1.000 -59.357 -1506.432 1950.480 1950.480 F8-1 F8-1 0.03 OK 0.77 OK Strong Shear Check Member Result Name Case Offset ft Demand Capacity Vy Code Unity Vy K K Ref. Check Details C001 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+Z+30%+X 15.370 1.099 195.048 G6-1, 2b 0.01 OK Weak Shear Check Member Result Name Case Offset Demand Vz Capacity Vz Code Unity ft K K Ref. Check Details C002 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 1.000 -7.846 C001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 7.219 -7.846 195.048 G6-1, 2b 0.04 OK 195.048 G6-1, 2b 0.04 OK Combined Torsion Check Member Result Name Case Offset Code ft Ref. Unity Details Check C002 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 0.000 H3-6 C001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 15.370 H3-6 0.50 OK Tr = 800.292 K -in, Torsion Shear Stress Unity = 0.461 , Axial Unity = 0.001 , Bending Unity = 0.086 , Flexural Shear Unity = 0.040 1.09 OK Tr = 800.292 K -in, Torsion Shear Stress Unity = 0.461 , Axial Unity = 0.004 , Bending Unity = 0.841 , Flexural Shear Unity = 0.040 Torsion Shear Check Member Result Name Case Offset Demand Tau ft Ksi Capacity Tau Ksi Code Unity Details Ref. Check Page 2 VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 (www.iesweb.com) •Project RWC`,Model:' Jo7 n'Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING" T:\Sf ade' i Net-SNAZ\SNAZ-16-32 C002 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X C001 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X Septernber 24, 2016 RWC Canopies\04=Analysis\'`" 0.000 10.448 22.680 0.000 10.448 22.680 H3-10.46 OK Tr = 800.292 K -in, Venant Shear = 10.448 Ksi H3-1 0.46 OK Tr = 800.292 K -in, Venant Shear = 10.448 Ksi Page 3 VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 (www.iesweb.com) Project: RWC_Model_3.0 Jaen Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING September 24, 2016 T:\Shade n Net - SNAZ\SNAZ-16-32_RWC Canopies\04 Analysis\ Equation Load Combinations Load Case Cases Equation .9D+Di 1 0.90D .9D+E »+X+30%+Z 3 0.70D + 1.30E+X + 0.39E+Z .9D+E »+X+30%+Z:OS 3 0.70D + 1.25E+X + 0.38E+Z .9D+E »+X+30% -Z 3 0.70D + 1.30E+X + 0.39E -Z .9D+E »+X+30%-Z:OS 3 0.70D + 1.25E+X + 0.38E -Z .9D+E »+Z+30%+X 3 0.70D + 0.39E+X + 1.30E+Z .9D+E »+Z+30%+X:OS 3 0.70D + 0.38E+X + 1.25E+Z .9D+E »+Z+30% -X 3 0.70D + 0.39E -X + 1.30E+Z .9D+E »+Z+30%-X:OS 3 0.70D + 0.38E -X + 1.25E+Z .9D+E »-X+30%+Z 3 0.700 + 1.30E -X + 0.39E+Z .9D+E »-X+30%+Z:OS 3 0.70D + 1.25E -X + 0.38E+Z .9D+E »-X+30%-Z 3 0.70D + 1.30E -X + 0.39E -Z .9D+E »-X+30%-Z:OS 3 0.70D + 1.25E -X + 0.38E -Z .9D+E »-Z+30%+X 3 0.700 + 0.39E+X + 1.30E-2 .9D+E »-Z+30%+X:OS 3 0.70D + 0.38E+X + 1.25E -Z .9D+E »-Z+30%-X 3 0.70D + 0.39E -X + 1.30E -Z .9D+E »-Z+30%-X:OS 3 0.70D + 0.38E -X + 1.25E -Z .9D+W »+X 2 0.90D + W+X 1.2D+.5L+Lpa+.5S+Di 3 1.20D + 0.50L + 0.50S 1.2D+1.6L+.2Di+.5S 3 1.20D + 1.60L + 0.50S 1.2D+1.6L+.5Lr 2 1.20D + 1.60L 1.2D+1.6Lr+.5W »+X 2 1.20D + 0.50W+X 1.2D+1.6Lr+L 2 1.20D + 0.50L 1.2D+1.6S+.5L+Lpa 3 1.20D + 0.50L + 1.60S 1.2D+1.6S+.5W »+X 3 1.200 + 1.60S + 0.50W+X 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+X+30%+Z 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.30E+X + 0.39E+Z 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+X+30%+Z:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.25E+X + 0.38E+Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+X+30% -Z 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.30E+X + 0.39E -Z 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+X+30%-Z:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.25E+X + 0.38E -Z 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+Z+30%+X 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.39E+X + 1.30E+Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+Z+30%+X:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.38E+X + 1.25E+Z 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+Z+30% -X 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.39E -X + 1.30E+Z 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+Z+30%-X:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.38E -X + 1.25E+Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-X+30%+Z 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.30E -X + 0.39E+Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-X+30%+Z:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.25E -X + 0.38E+Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-X+30%-Z 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.30E -X + 0.39E -Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-X+30%-Z:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 1.25E -X + 0.38E -Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-Z+30%+X 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.39E+X + 1.30E -Z 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-Z+30%+X:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.38E+X + 1.25E -Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-Z+30%-X 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.39E -X + 1.30E -Z 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »-Z+30%-X:OS 5 1.40D + 0.50L + 0.20S + 0.38E -X + 1.25E -Z 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5Lr »+X 3 1.20D + 0.50L + W+X 1.20+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 4 1.20D + 0.50L + 0.50S + W+X 1.40+.9H 1 1.40D Page 1 VisualAnalysis 12.00.0019 (www.iesweb.com) BASE PLATE ANCHORAGE Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Design Summary base plate Base Plate Design: Thickness = 1 in Fy = 36 Ksi Anchorage Design: Diameter = 1.125 in Type = Threaded Rod Embed = 12 in Fy = 36 Ksi Fu = 58 Ksi Concrete Design: F'c = 2.5 Ksi Cracking = True Steel Specification: AISC 360-10 Concrete Specification: ACI 318-08 OK; this program does not take stiffeners into account. See additional base plate calculations included separately from this report. Limit State Load Key Demand Capacity Unity Value Concrete Bearing 0 1.3813 Ksi 1.3813 1.000 Plate Bending 8 18.286 K -in 8.1 K -in 2.258 AnchorageTension 8 Steel Strength 97.558 K 99.572 K 0.980 Concrete Breakout 97.558 K 10000000000000000000 0.000 Concrete Pullout 97.558 K 00000000000 K 0.946 Concrete Blowout N.A 103.1 K N.A. N.A Anchorage Shear 8 Steel Strength 6.71 K 0.061 Concrete Breakout 6.71 K 110.46 K 0.000 Concrete Pryout 6.71 K 10000000000000000000 0.186 00000000000 K Anchorage Interaction 8- 36.027 K 0.980 Anchorage Detailing - - - OK Plate Detailing - - - OK Page 1 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Base Plate Analysis Analysis Classification (AISC Design Guide #1) Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Support Strength, f'c = 2.5 Ksi Loaded Area, Al = 324 inA2 Support Area, A2 =The largest area contained on the support that is geometrically similar to and concentric with the loaded area. A2 = 324 inA2 (ACI 10.17.1) ¢fp„ = 490.85f c. A-1 < 00,85f' * 2.0 = 1.3813 Ksi Pu = 2.04 K (Compression is positive) Mun=0K-in—>eB=0in Mub = 1379.8 K -in —> eN = -676.37 in Edge Lengths: B = 18 in N = 18 inA2 (Equations 3.3.7) N direction: N Pu ecritical = 2.0 20{ B - 8.959 in vs. eN = -676.37 in Jpn B direction: B Pu ec,irtcaz-20 2.0! N =8.959invs.eB=0in pn Design Guide #1 sign convention Loads and eccentricities shown in positive direction Classification: Axial Compression with a Large Moment in the strong direction. Page 2 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com • Prgject: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Base Plate w/ Large Strong -Axis Moment (AISC Design Guide #1. Section 3.41 Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Base Plate Parameters: B=18 in, N=18 in, f=7in, Pu=2.04K, eN=676.37 in For large moments, fpu = 4fpn (See Support Bearing Capacity) fpu = 1.3813 Ksi Check Base Plate Dimensions: (f+) N2 2*P*(eN+f) > (gpn*B 256 in^2 > 112.14 in^2 Base Plate area is adequate Calculate Bearing Length, Y: Y= (f +2)± (N2 2 * Pu * (eN + f) _ 4.006 in f +2) Ofpn*B Base plate with large moment (Fig. 3.4.1 AISC Design Guide #1) Base Plate Bending Demand: Tension Interface Tu= fpn*B*Y — Pu = 1.3813 Ksi * 18 in*4.006 in - 2.04 K = 97.558 K Moment arm for tension anchor group, x = 2.9961 in w = Effective width for tension anchor group, where the load distributes at 45 degree angles w = 15.984 in Tux Mu(Tension) = w = 18.286 in -Klin Base Plate Bending Demand: Bearing Interface Column Depth, d = 9.9606 in Column Width, b = 9.9803 in Depth Reduction Factor, a = 0.8 (sect 3.1.3) Width Reduction Factor, y = 0.8 (sect 3.1.3) N — ad =5.0158 in 2.0 B2.Ob n =5.0079 in Mu(n) calculation is a crude attempt at including some 2 -way bending in the analysis. The approach is based on the note at the end of section 3.4.2. a M1(n) = fpu * 2 00 = 1.3813 Ksi * 5.0079 in^2.0 / 2.0 = 17.32 in-K/in Since Y < m Mu(m) = fpuY(m — ) = 1.3813 Ksi * 4.006 in * (5.0158 in - 4.006 in / 2.0) = 16.67 in-K/in m= Figure shows bending lines of column and illustrates base plate under strong axis bending. Effective width shown by dashed lines. Mu(Bearing) = 17.32 in-K/in Controlling Mu = max( 18.286 in-K/in , 17.32 in -Win) = 18.286 in -Klin Page 3 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Pro}ect: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Base Plate Design Support Bearing Capacity (ACI 318-08 10.14.1) Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X fpu = 1.3813 Ksi 04n = 0.85f Al < 00.85 f * 2.0 = 1.3813 Ksi = 0.65 Support Strength, fc = 2.5 Ksi Loaded Area, Al = 324 in"2 Support Area, A2 = 324.01 inA2 (The largest area contained on the support that is geometrically similar to and concentric with the loaded area) Unity = fpu / (4)fpn) = 1.000 Plate Bending (AISC 360-10 F11) Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Mu = 18.286 K -in Mn = Mp <_ 1.6My (Eqn F11-1) For rectangular sections, 1.6 * My will not control t2 (pm,=bFyZ= PFY 47aw = 0.90 , Fy = 36 Ksi, t = 1 in, w = width = 1 in 4Mn = 8.1 K -in Unity = Mu / (4)* Mn) = 2.258 Base Plate Detailing (AISC 360-10 J3) Messages: Bolt spacing is adequate. Bolt edge distances are adequate. Anchorage Design Page 4 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 sri Y 25'10 Page 5 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Interaction (ACI 318-08 D.7) LoadSet: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Demand: Vux = 6.71 K Vuy = 0 K Tu = 97.558 K Capacity: (I)Vnx = 36.027 K 4Vny = >1.0E20 (I)Tn = 99.572 K X Interaction Vux/IVnx = 0.18625 Tu/4Tn = 0.97978 Equation D.7.1 governs, Interaction Value = 0.97978 Y Interaction Vuy/lVny = 0 Tu/4Tn = 0.97978 Equation D.7.1 governs, Interaction Value = 0.97978 Unity = 0.980 Note: Software does not consider interaction between shears in x and y directions. This check is left to the discretion of the user. Bolt Tension (ACI 318-08 D.5.1) Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Tension Bolts: A0, Al, A2 cNsa = 'bsefuta fu = 58 Ksi , fy = 36 Ksi futa = min(fu, 1.9 *fy, 125 Ksi) = 58 Ksi = 0.75 (Ductile Anchor) n=3 Anchor Type: Threaded Rod, dia = 1.125 in Ase = 0.763 inA2 (ACI 355.3R-11 Appendix A) cNsa = 99.572 K, Tu = 97.558 K Unity = 97.558 K / 99.572 K = 0.980 Concrete Tension Breakout - Anchor Group (ACI 318-08 D.5.2) See if Anchor Group Breakout applies 1) Multiple anchors in tension? Tension bolt count = 3 ---AND--- 2) Is anchor spacing < 3 * bolt depth? Spacing = 7 in 3*hef=3*12 in= 36 in Anchor group breakout applies Rebar to be designed for breakout demand per D.5.2.9 Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Tension Demand, Tu = 97.558 K Page 6 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Concrete Pullout (ACI 318-08 D.5.3) Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Tension Bolts: AO, Al, A2 ONpn = nlketPc,pNp = 0.75 Condition A Bolt Count, n = 3 Seismic reduction factor l/je= 1.00 Cracked concrete factors = 1.000 Np = BAbrgfc Anchor Type: Threaded Rod, dia = 1.125 in Abrg = 2.291 inA2 (ACI 355.3R-11 Appendix A) fc=2.5Ksi Np = 45.82 K 4Npn = 103.1 K, Tu = 97.558 K Unity=97.558 K/103.1 K = 0.946 Bolt Shear in X Direction (ACI 318-08 D.6.1) Bolts in shear: A0, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7 Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X 4)Vsa i 0lbottigroutnAseluta Effect of bolt type D.6.1.2 /colt = 0.6 Grout pads = 0 8 effect D.6.1.3grout fu = 58 Ksi , fy = 36 Ksi futa=min(fu, 1.9*fy, 125 Ksi ) = 58 Ksi Anchor Type: Threaded Rod, dia = 1.125 in Ase = 0.763 inA2 (ACI 355.3R-11 Appendix A) = 0.65 Ductile Anchor, n = 8 4)Vsa = 110.46 K, Vu = 6.71 K Unity = 6.71 K/110.46 K = 0.061 Concrete Shear Breakout in X Direction (ACI 318-08 D.6.2) Rebar to be designed for breakout demand per D.6.2.9 Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X Shear Demand, Vu = 6.71 K Page 7 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Concrete Prvout in X Direction - Anchor Group (ACI 318-08 D.6.3.1) See if Group Pryout applies 1) Multiple anchors in shear? Bolt count = 8 AND 2) Is anchor spacing < 3 * bolt depth? Spacing = 14. in 3 * hef = 3 * 12 in = 36 in Group prvout applies Anchors: A0, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7 Load Set: Load Set 1 Load Combination: 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X 4511cp = 451PekcpNcb Ncbg Calculations Ncbg = Axc Oec,N ed,N c,N1cp,NNb (Equation D-5) la Aka Effective Edge Distance (D.5.2.3) hef =12 in Anchors are close to at least three edges Ca,max = 12.5 in, MaxSpacing = 14. in hef' = max (Ca,max / 1.5, MaxSpacing / 3 ) = 8.3333 in Anc = 625 inA2 ANco = 9h'ef2 = 625 in'2 Eccentricity factor wth ec,N = < 1.o = 1.000 1+ 2e," 3h�I Ca,min = 5.5 in @ bolt A2 Edge effects iped N = 0.7 + 0.3 ca'm;n = 0.832 1.Shef Cracking concrete 1pc N= 1.0 Post -installed factor Zcp,N= 1.0 fc=2.5Ksi Nb = kcd fc * hi 1.5 = 28.868 K where kc = 24.0 (Equation D-7) Ncbg = 24.018 K Vcpg Calculations Seismic reduction factor ije= 1.00 kcp = 2.0 (hef >_ 2.5 in) (D.6.3.1) = 0.75 Condition A 4)Vcpg = 36.027 K, Vu = 6.71 K Unity = 6.71 K / 36.027 K = 0.186 Page 8 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September24, 2016 Anchorage Detailing (ACI 318-08 D.81 Messages: Spacing is adequate (D8.1). Side cover is adequate (D8.2). Load Legend Load Key Load Set Load Combination 0 Load Set 1 1.4D 1 Load Set 1 1.2D + 0.5Lr 2 Load Set 1 1.2D + 0.5S 3 Load Set 1 1.2D + 1.6Lr 4 Load Set 1 1.2D + 1.6Lr + 0.5W+X 5 Load Set 1 1.2D + 1.6S 6 Load Set 1 1.2D + 1.6S + 0.5W+X 7 Load Set 1 1.2D + 0.5W+X 8 Load Set 1 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X 9 Load Set 1 1.2D + 0.5S + W+X 10 Load Set 1 1.2D + W+X 11 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.3E+X 12 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.25E+X 13 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.3E+X + 0.39E+Y 14 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.25E+X + 0.375E+Y 15 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.3E+Y 16 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.25E+Y 17 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 0.39E+X + 1.3E+Y 18 Load Set 1 1.396D + 0.2S + 0.375E+X + 1.25E+Y 19 Load Set 1 0.9D + W+X 20 Load Set 1 0.704D + 1.3E+X 21 Load Set 1 0.704D + 1.25E+X 22 Load Set 1 0.704D + 1.3E+X + 0.39E+Y 23 Load Set 1 0.704D + 1.25E+X + 0.375E+Y 24 Load Set 1 0.704D + 1.3E+Y 25 Load Set 1 0.704D + 1.25E+Y 26 Load Set 1 0.704D + 0.39E+X + 1.3E+Y 27 Load Set 1 0.7040 + 0.375E+X + 1.25E+Y Connection Model Report Page 9 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Design Criteria SDS: 0.98 SDC: D Type 5 Irregularity?: False Rho X: 1.3 Rho Y: 1.3 Rho Z: 1.3 Omega X: 1.25 Omega Y: 1.25 Omega Z: 1.25 Project Information Title: Billing Information: Engineer Name: John Skwiot Company Name: FJS ENGINEERING Base Plate Name: base plate Length, X: 18 in Length, Y: 18 in Thickness: 1 in Fy: 36 Ksi Centroid X: 12.5 in Centroid Y: 12.5 in Column Column Type: Round Column Shape Column Diameter: 10 in Anchorage Column Count: 3 Row Count: 3 Edge Distance, X: 2 in Edge Distance, Y: 2 in Welded to Base Plate: False Typical Anchor Bolt Anchor Type: Threaded Rod Diameter: 1.125 in Fu: 58 Ksi Fy: 36 Ksi Is Ductile: True Embed Length: 12 in Nut Type: Heavy Square Anchorage Reinforcing Tension: Bars Sized to Prevent Breakout Shear: Bars Sized to Prevent Breakout Concrete Pedestal Length, X: 25 in Length, Y: 25 in Thickness: 60 in Fc Concrete: 2.5 Ksi Cracked Concrete: True Has Grout: True Fc Grout: 2.5 Ksi Applied Loads Page 10 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Load Set Load Case Fx Fy Fz Mx My (K) (K) (K) (K -in) (K -in) Load Set 1 D 0 0 -1.7 74 0 Load Set 1 Lr 1.9 0 0 370 0 Load Set 1 S 1.34 0 0 257 0 Load Set 1 W+X 5.76 0 0 1106 0 Load Set 1 E+X 0.65 0 0 64 0 Load Set 1 E+Y 0 0.65 0 0 0 Load Combinations Page 11 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Project: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 f Code Name Effective Equation ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.4D+1.6H 1.4D ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.20+1.6L+.5Lr 1.2D + 0.5Lr ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+1.6L+.5S 1.2D + 0.5S ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+1.6Lr+L 1.2D + 1.6Lr ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+1.6Lr+.5W »+X 1.2D + 1.6Lr + 0.5W+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+1.6S+.5L+Lpa 1.2D + 1.6S ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+1.6S+.5W »+X 1.2D + 1.6S + 0.5W+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+1.6R+.5W »+X 1.2D + 0.5W+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5Lr »+X 1.2D + 0.5Lr + W+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5S »+X 1.2D + 0.5S + W+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+W+.5L+Lpa+.5R »+X 1.2D + W+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+X 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.3E+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+X:O 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.25E+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »(+X+30%+Y) 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.3E+X + 0.39E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »(+X+30%+Y):0 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.25E+X + 0.375E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+Y 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.3E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »+Y:f) 1.396D + 0.2S + 1.25E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.2D+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »(+Y+30%+X) 1.396D + 0.2S + 0.39E+X + 1.3E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD 1.20+E+.5L+Lpa+.2S »(+Y+30%+X):Q 1.396D + 0.2S + 0.375E+X + 1.25E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+W »+X 0.9D + W+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »+X 0.704D + 1.3E+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »+X:Q 0.7040 + 1.25E+X ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »(+X+30%+Y) 0.704D + 1.3E+X + 0.39E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »(+X+30%+Y):0 0.704D + 1.25E+X + 0.375E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »+Y 0.704D + 1.3E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »+Y:f2 0.704D + 1.25E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »(+Y+30%+X) 0.7040 + 0.39E+X + 1.3E+Y ASCE 7-10 LRFD .9D+E »(+Y+30%+X):f2 0.704D + 0.375E+X + 1.25E+Y Design Loads Page 12 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com Projtct: untitled Billing Reference: none John Skwiot, FJS ENGINEERING File: Baseplate.vcbp Saturday, September 24, 2016 Load Fxu Fyu Fzu Mxu Myu Key (K) (K) (K) (K -in) (K -in) 0 0 0 -2.38 103.6 0 1 0.95 0 -2.04 273.8 0 2 0.67 0 -2.04 217.3 0 3 3.04 0 -2.04 680.8 0 4 5.92 0 -2.04 1233.8 0 5 2.144 0 -2.04 500 0 6 5.024 0 -2.04 1053 0 7 2.88 0 -2.04 641.8 0 8 6.71 0 -2.04 1379.8 0 9 6.43 0 -2.04 1323.3 0 10 5.76 0 -2.04 1194.8 0 11 1.113 0 -2.3732 237.9 0 12 1.0805 0 -2.3732 234.7 0 13 1.113 0.2535 -2.3732 237.9 0 14 1.0805 0.24375 -2.3732 234.7 0 15 0.268 0.845 -2.3732 154.7 0 16 0.268 0.8125 -2.3732 154.7 0 17 0.5215 0.845 -2.3732 179.66 0 18 0.51175 0.8125 -2.3732 178.7 0 19 5.76 0 -1.53 1172.6 0 20 0.845 0 -1.1968 135.3 0 21 0.8125 0 -1.1968 132.1 0 22 0.845 0.2535 -1.1968 135.3 0 23 0.8125 0.24375 -1.1968 132.1 0 24 0 0.845 -1.1968 52.096 0 25 0 0.8125 -1.1968 52.096 0 26 0.2535 0.845 -1.1968 77.056 0 27 0.24375 0.8125 -1.1968 76.096 0 Page 13 of 13 VAConnect 2.00.0005 www.iesweb.com BASE PLATE DESIGN (Plate width) 'Number of stiffeners on one side of plate) 'Distance from stiffener to plate edge) 23 Sep 2016 15:43:59 - 3. Base_Plate_Calcs_EDIT.sm #RWC Canopies Base Plate Calculations .Refe_r._ences Blodgett, Omer. "Design of Welded Structures". James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation. 1966 American Institute of Steel Construction."Base Plate and Anchor Rod Design", Second Edition. 2006. EInput data: - Base plate bplate 18 in - Stiffeners 'Stiffener length Lst= 3. 5 in 'Steel plate yield strength F =36ksi y (Stiffener height dst= 3.5 in Plate Area 2 2 Aplate- bplate = 324 in (Stiffener thickness tg= 0.375 in Offset of stiffener end from side of column dstf= 3.5 in - Bolts Bolt diameter DIAbolt 1.12 in 'Number of bolts Nbolts_all 8 Bolt edge distance Dbolt 2.O in str = 1 no Dstf 3.3 in Bolt tensile strength F = 60 ksi u Number of anchor bolts on one side of plate Nbolt 3 'Distance from center of plate to bolt bplate f- 2 Dbolt 7 in - Column Column width Column wall thickness dcolumr 10 in t f= 0. 625 in - Pier Allowable stress on concrete F p= 3.06 ksi Pier diagonal' d =3.Oft pier Area of concrete support 2 d Aconr n• pier 2 r - 1017 . 88 in Column yield strength F =46ksi yc (Concrete compressive strength f'=2.5ksi c Considering concrete as uncracked *3= 1.25 Supplementary reinforcement is not present cD= 0.70 shear 0.75 1/5 Distance from column to bolts • 23 Sep 2016 15:43:59 - 3. Base_Plate_Calcs_EDIT.sm -"-Loads (Ultimate Axial Load Pu=1.7kip Design moment (based on resultant of cable forces at top of column) Mdesign 126 kip ft Design shear V = 7 . 9 kip Calculations: Plate width to corner from column d _(bplate dcolumn} pmb 2 J 1.4=5.6in l Distance from bolt to opposite plate edge N' = 1 •bplate- Dbolt 16 in Load eccentricity e Mdesign_ 889 in load P u Maximum bearing stress A f= 0.65-0.85.f' conc pmax c Aplate Maximum bearing pressure kip gmax f pmax bplate- 44.07 in Critical eccentricity bplate ecrit 2 2•q max Pu =8.98in dctb dpi 2.12 in = 3.48 in 2.45ksi Distance from center of plate to bolt bplate f_ 2 Dbolt 7 in Area provided 2 b Acheckl f+ bptate = 256 in 2 Ratio A check2 0 27 A checkl Area required Acheckl 2Pu le load fl 69. 16 in 2 gmax 1 Area required < Provided ---> OK 23 Sep 2016 15:43:59 - 3. Base_Plate_Calcs_EDIT.sm 'Bearing area - Calculation#1 2 Y1= f+ bplate + f+ bplate 2 Pu leload+ f) -29.67 in gmax (Bearing area - Calculation#2 • Yf+ by tate (f+ bplate 2Pule 2 load+ f) - 2.33 in2 q Bearing area Y=min[Yi Y2])= 2.33 in Anchor rods tension T u =q max .Y-Pu=101.03kip Cantilever dimension #1 m- bplate-0.95dcolumn+ dstf) - 2.59 in 2 Bracket shear max V = 1.0 0 Mdesign = 178.3019kip gus 0.51d+d Colum ctb Required plate thickness (Check #1) t =1.49• p_req fYY2l pmax2(m 2 1 F = 0.71 in y Cantilever dimension #2 x- bplate dcolumn+ 1 dstf+ t D= 0.56 in 2 2 2 bolt 'Required plate thickness (Check #2) tp regl 2.11 11 b Tu IxIF - 0.62 in plate y Cantilever dimension #3 n- 0 . 8 (d bplate column+ 2 dst 2 . = 2 . 2 (Required plate thickness (Check #3) Y2 f • pmaxY2(n 2 ) tp reg2 1 . 49 F - 0. 6 in y (Minimum required plate thickness tp min max Q tp_req tp_regl tp_reg2])= 0.71 in Use 0.75 inch or greater plate thickness 3/5 Distance from bottom fiber to centroid) Distance from top fiber to centroid) Selected plate thickness tplate 1.0 in 23 Sep 2016 15:43:59 - 3. Base_Plate_Calcs_EDIT.sm cb= 0.62 in c =3.38 in y Moment of inertia I =486 in 4 y Bending stress in bottom of section ob_ Mdesigi 1000.c b ab= = 000 cb= 1.9289 10 6 psi y Maximum shear force at neutral axis d 1 Vgus• 1000•(2. tg• cyl•cy 2stJ f 1= t I 11 - 1 .52.10 y Shear force in brackets T b= 2 t - 2. 0 213.10 6 ps i g Shear force at face of base plate Bending stress in top of section Mdesi n 1000• c 7 at= gI y- 1.05.10 psi 6 lbf in y _ tplate - Vgus• 1000•(2(dcolumn+2 dstf)• tplate, lCb 2 _ 1.5 10 6 lbf f 2 l `` in y Input data: Weld strength reduction factor weld 0.75 Yield strength of welding rod metal FEXX= 70 ksi Weld thickness thickweld 0.25 in Yield strength of plate f y_plate 36 ksi Weld Design Calculations: Horizontal Area of weld Aweld 2 Lst•thickweld• 0. 707= 1 .24 in 2 'Weld Strength Strength of base metal Fw= 0. 6• FEXX= 42 ksi Strength _ 9weld Fw Aweld- 5.57 kip weld 2 L in Weld Strength > Equivalent force on weld st 4/5 Vertical shear force on weld) 23 Sep 2016 15:43:59 - 3. Base_Plate_Calcs_EDIT.sm We1diDe 1S rgnZCa 7.1Wtions : VeFF 1 Bending force on welds (per bracket) f b= strt6 lbf no 3.9433.10 no Resultant force on weld V gus•1000 6 lbf in f s 4 (strno dst+ t late - 9.91 10 in ll P fr= Jfb2+fs21=1.107 lbf in 'Weld thickness required f r W _ 1000 _ 0 .338 in regd F • cp w weld Use 3/8" vertical welds on stiffeners DRILLED PIER CALCULATIONS Organization: Project Name: Job #: Design by: Date: Drilled Pier Analysis (Bored Pile) RWC Canopies SNAZ-16-32 J. Skwiot September 17, 2016 Loading and Geometry Units Top of Pier Condition Passive Wedge Pier Diameter Torsional Moment Conc. Strength (fc) F.S. Skin Friction Shaft Type English Free Head 2.5 2.50 ft 49.00 kip -ft 2500 psi 2.0 Geotechnical Properties Lyr Material Type 1 Granular Soil 2 Granular Soil Results Conc. Elast. Modulus Cross Section Area Allowable Geot. Torsion uscs SM SM Vertical • Belled INPUT DATA Pier Length Lateral Load (Shear) Moment Load Vertical Load Uplift Load Groundwater Depth F.S. Torsional Moment Cracked Allow. Lateral Defl. Layer Consistency Lat. S.G, Thick, ft kcf 1.0 Loose 275.0- 0 - 1 275.0 5.0 Loose 275.0- 1 - 6 275.0 2850 ksi 706.9 in2 43.7 k -ft Allowable Structural Capacities Axial Compression 887.0 kips Axial Tension -190.1 kips Torsional Moment 70.7 k -ft Bending Moment (#1) 186 k -ft Allowable Geotechnical Capacities Total Vert. Settlement due to El. Shortening due to Side Friction due to End Bearing 0.01 in 0.00 in 0.01 in 0.00 in 6.00 ft 1.00 kips 92.00 kip -ft 1.70 kips 0.00 kips 0.00 ft 3.3 Uncracked 50% cracked • 0.10 in Ult. Sk. Kp F.S. Cohesion, Fr, psf on Kp ksf 700 2.50 1.25 Gamma, Phi, pcf Deg 0.50 115.0 25.00 700 2.50 1.25 0.50 115.0 25.00 Conc. Strength (fc) Section Modulus Moment of Inertia 2500 psi 2650.7 in3 19880 in4 Maximum Deflection is 0.07 in at 0.00 ft (< 0.10 in) Maximum Moment is 92.12 k -ft at 0.30 ft Maximum Shear is -8.59 kips at 5.70 ft Pier Tip Movement is 0.00 in at the bottom (6.00 ft) Axial Compression Axial Tension Torsional Moment 9.0 kips -4.5 kips 43.7 k -ft SoilStructure.com Drilled Pier v1.06 1 t 0 005 Codes used: ACI 318-11 & IBC 2012 NOTES: 1. Downdrag is a function of skin friction. If the user inputs a side friction of zero (designed for end bearing only), Downdrag will not be calculated by the program. Therefore, the user should independently calculate the Negative Skin Friction or Downdrag magnitude by other means. 2. The user shall ensure Positive side friction capacity + end bearing capacity (Geotechnical Axial Compression) exceeds axial Toad plus downdrag force (all service level). This may require additional pier embedment. 3. In reinforcement design, Pu shall equal to 1.2(Dead Load) plus 1.6 (Live Load + Downdrag Load). These load factors may vary with time and governing code. 4. Vertical downward load (service level) shall include the self weight of the pier. Additional 15% settlement may occur due to creep. SoilStructure.com Drilled Pier v1.06 2 Lateral Table Node # Depth, Soil Modulus, Shear, Moment, Deflection, Lat. Soil Pr, Allow. Soil Pr, ft ksf kips kip -ft in k/ftA2 k/ft"2 1 0.00 688 1.00 92.00 0.07 1.65 3.54 2 0.15 688 0.39 92.10 0.07 1.62 3.62 3 0.30 688 -0.19 92.12 0.07 1.58 3.71 4 0.45 688 -0.75 92.05 0.06 1.55 3.79 5 0.60 688 -1.28 91.90 0.06 1.51 3.88 6 0.75 688 -1.79 91.67 0.06 1.48 3.97 7 0.90 688 -2.27 91.36 0.06 1.44 4.05 8 1.05 688 -2.74 90.99 0.05 1.40 4.14 9 1.20 688 -3.18 90.54 0.05 1.37 4.23 10 1.35 688 -3.60 90.03 0.05 1.33 4.31 11 1.50 688 -3.99 89.46 0.05 1.30 4.40 12 1.65 688 -4.37 88.84 0.04 1.27 4.48 13 1.80 688 -4.73 88.15 0.04 1.23 4.57 14 1.95 688 -5.07 87.42 0.04 1.20 4.66 15 2.10 688 -5.39 86.63 0.04 1.17 4.74 16 2.25 688 -5.69 85.80 0.03 1.13 4.83 17 2.40 688 -5.97 84.93 0.03 1.10 4.92 18 2.55 688 -6.23 84.01 0.03 1.07 5.00 19 2.70 688 -6.48 83.06 0.03 1.04 5.09 20 2.85 688 -6.71 82.07 0.03 1.00 5.17 21 3.00 688 -6.93 81.05 0.02 0.97 5.26 22 3.15 688 -7.13 79.99 0.02 0.94 5.35 23 3.30 688 -7.31 78.91 0.02 0.91 5.43 24 3.45 688 -7.48 77.80 0.02 0.88 5.52 25 3.60 688 -7.64 76.66 0.02 0.85 5.61 26 3.75 688 -7.78 75.51 0.02 0.82 5.69 27 3.90 688 -7.91 74.33 0.01 0.80 5.78 28 4.05 688 -8.03 73.13 0.01 0.77 5.86 29 4.20 688 -8.13 71.92 0.01 0.74 5.95 30 4.35 688 -8.23 70.69 0.01 0.71 6.04 31 4.50 688 -8.31 69.45 0.01 0.69 6.12 32 4.65 688 -8.38 68.20 0.01 0.66 6.21 33 4.80 688 -8.44 66.94 0.01 0.64 6.30 34 4.95 688 -8.48 65.67 0.01 0.61 6.38 35 5.10 688 -8.52 64.40 0.00 0.59 6.47 36 5.25 688 -8.55 63.12 0.00 0.56 6.55 37 5.40 688 -8.57 61.83 0.00 0.54 6.64 38 5.55 688 -8.58 60.54 0.00 0.52 6.73 39 5.70 688 -8.59 59.26 0.00 0.49 6.81 40 5.85 688 -8.58 57.97 0.00 0.47 6.90 41 6.00 688 -8.57 56.68 0.00 0.45 6.99 Axial Table Layer # Depth, Unit wt, Tot. Stress, Porewater, Eff. Stress, Skin Fric, ft pcf psf psf psf psf 1 0.00 - 1.00 115.00 115.00 62.42 52.58 700 2 1.00 - 6.00 115.00 690.00 374.52 315.48 700 Layer # TSA Sk.Fr, Fr. Ang, ESA Sk.Fr, Neg.Sk.Fr. Downdrag, Beta Geo. Tors. Cap, kips Deg kips kip kip -ft 1 -2.7 25.00 -0.4 No 0.00 0.70 7.29 2 19.2 25.00 3.7 No 0.00 0.70 36.44 SoilStructure.com Drilled Pier v1.06 Reinforcement Column Interaction Diagram #5 ties @ 12 in Design Axial Load, kip Design Moment, k -ft 100 200 300 NOTES: 1. If Torsional Moments are included, an additional check shall be made for concrete breakout due to shear directed parallel to the edge of anchors. Concrete Anchorage Breakout may govern. 2. If Torsional Moments are included in addition to Lateral Loads, Lateral capacity shall be reduced by 40% if Torsional Moment Load/Lateral Load ratio (TMULL) is 15 and unaffected if TMULL ratio is 7.5 or Tess. You may interpolate linearly for TMULL ratio between 7.5 to 15. See Report # 4910-4504-723-12 by The University of Florida, April, 2003, available online. SoilStructure.com Drilled Pier v1.06 4 � Depth below ground surface, ft Shear (service level), kips -8 -6 -4 -2 0 Lateral Deflection, inch 8.015 0.03 0.045 0.06 Moment (service level), kip -It 60 70 80 90 Lat. Soil Pressure, k/11^2 2 4 6 SoilStructure.com Drilled Pier v1.06 5 References: 1. "Analytical and Computer Methods in Foundation Engineering", J.E. Bowles, 1974 2. "Pile Foundation Analysis and Design", Poulos & Davis, 1980. 3. "Foundation Analysis", R.F. Scott, 1981 4. "Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice", 2nd Ed, Terzaghi & Peck, 1967. 5. "Foundation Analysis and Design", 5th Ed., J.E. Bowles, 1996 6. "Foundation Design: Principles & Practices", 3rd Ed., Coduto, Kitch and Yeung, 2015 7. "Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain", 7th Ed., W.C. Young & R.G. Budynas, 2002 8. "Engineering Design in Geotechnics" , 2nd Ed., F. Azizi, 2013 9. "Pile Design & Construction", Tomlinson & Woodward, 5th ed, 2007. 10. "Advanced Foundation Engineering" V.N.S. Murthy, 2007 11. "Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multilayered Soil Deposits", Basu, Salgado & Prezzi, 2008. 12. "Foundations and Earth Retaining Structures" M. Budhu, 2008 13. "Contemporary Topics in Deep Foundations", GSP 185, ASCE, 2009 14. "Single Piles and Pile Groups Under Lateral Loading", 2nd Ed., L.C. Reese & W.F. Van Impe, 2011 15. "Behaviour of Piles", Institute of Civil Engineers, 1971 16. "Load Testing of Deep Foundations", C. Crowther, 1988 17. "GeoSupport 2004", GSP 124, ASCE, 2004 18. "Design and Construction of Drilled Piers", American Concrete Institute 336.3R, 2006 19. "Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and LRFD Design Methods", FHWA-NHI, 2010 20. "Drilled Shafts -Student Workbook", L.C. Reese & M.W. O'Neil, NHI Course 13214, 1988 21. "Handbook of Soil Mechanics", A. Kezdi & L. Rethati, Vol. 3 & 4, 1990 22. "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete", ACI 318-11 23. "Reinforced Concrete Structures- Analysis & Design", D.A. Fanella, 2011 24. "Determine Optimum Depths of Drilled Shafts Subject to Combined Torsion and Lateral Loads Using Centrifuge Testing", University of Florida Report # 4910-4504-723-12, April 2003. 25. "Geotechnical Engineering: Unsaturated & Saturated Soils", Jean-Louis Briaud, 2013 26. "Pile Downdrag During Construction of Two Bridge Abutments", Brian K. Sears, 2008 27. Drilled Pier v1.06 Software by SoilStructure.com, 2016 SoilStructure.com Drilled Pier v1.06 6 6/5/2017 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development ROWLAND CUNNINGHAM 1312348AVE S TUKWILA, WA 98168 RE: Permit No. D16-0310 RWC GROUP 1312348AVE S Dear Permit Holder: Allan Ekberg, Mayor Jack Pace, Director In reviewing our current records, the above noted permit has not received a final inspection by the City of Tukwila Building Division. Per the International Building Code, International Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code and/or the National Electric Code, every permit issued by the Building Division under the provisions of these codes shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit has not begun within 180 days from the issuance date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work has begun for a period of 180 days. Your permit will expire on 7/24/2017. Based on the above, you are hereby advised to: 1) Call the City of Tukwila Inspection Request Line at 206-438-9350 to schedule for the next or final inspection. Each inspection creates a new 180 day period, provided the inspection shows progress. -or- 2) Submit a written request for permit extension to the Permit Center at least seven(7) days before it is due to expire. Address your extension request to the Building Official and state your reason(s) for the need to extend your permit. The Building Code does allow the Building Official to approve one extension of up to 180 days. If it is determined that your extension request is granted, you will be notified by mail. In the event you do not call for an inspection and/or receive an extension prior to 7/24/2017, your permit will become null and void and any further work on the project will require a new permit and associated fees. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Rache le Ripley Permit Technician File No: D16-0310 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development November 22, 2016 ROWLAND CUNNINGHAM 13123 48 AVE S TUKWILA, WA 98168 RE: Correction Letter # 1 DEVELOPMENT Permit Application Number D16-0310 RWC GROUP - 13123 48 AVE S Dear ROWLAND CUNNINGHAM, Allan Ekberg, Mayor Jack Pace, Director This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the following departments: BUILDING DEPARTMENT: Allen Johannessen at 206-433-7163 if you have questions regarding these comments. • (GENERAL NOTE) PLAN SUBMITTALS: (Min. size 1 1x17 to maximum size of 24x36; all sheets shall be the same size. New revised plan sheets shall be the same size sheets as those previously submitted.) (If applicable) "STAMP AND SIGNATURES" "Every page of a plan set must contain the seal/stamp, signature of the licensee(s) who prepared or who had direct supervision over the preparation of the work, and date of signature. Specifications that are prepared by or under the direct supervision of a licensee shall contain the seal/stamp, signature of the licensee and the date of signature. If the "specifications" prepared by a licensee are a portion of a bound specification document that contains specifications other than that of an engineering or land surveying nature, the licensee need only seal/stamp that portion or portions of the documents for which the licensee is responsible." It shall not be required to have each page of "specifications" (calculations) to be stamped and signed; Front page only will be sufficient. (WAC 196-23-010 & 196-23-020) (BUILDING REVIEW NOTES) 1. Provide a site plan showing where this shall be located. Include dimensions for setbacks. 2. Please provide the special inspections for the steel work and bolting to include all other related special inspections as required. Note: This permit plan review may not be complete as revised plans may require further corrections. FIRE DEPARTMENT: Al Metzler at 206-971-8718 if you have questions regarding these comments. • Was unable to locate any details on the flame propagation properties of the shade fabric. Provide documentation that the fabric meets the requirements of NFPA 701 or extend fire sprinkler protection to the canopy. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Lindsay Brown at 206-433-7166 if you have questions regarding these comments. • Submit a site plan to scale showing the location of the proposed canopy on the property, and indicate dimensions between the canopy edges and any existing building and property lines. Clearly show the dimensions of the canopy. If the canopy will cover existing parking spaces, show the parking spaces as crossed out on the site plan. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila Washinnton 98188 • Phnne 206-4.31-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 Please address the comments above in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that three (3) sets of revised plan pages, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a 'Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections/revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (206) 433-7165. Sincerely, yip Rachelle Ripley Permit Technician File No. D16-0310 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 o Tukwila Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW/ROUTING SLIP PERMIT NUMBER: D16-0310 DATE: 12/01/16 PROJECT NAME: RWC GROUP SITE ADDRESS: 13123 48 AVE S Original Plan Submittal X Response to Correction Letter # 1 Revision # before Permit Issued Revision # after Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: 6 ..1 I. Building Division III isN Public Works E pan kvoi- Fire Prevention Structural s L G ,SII Planning Division mg Permit Coordinator n PRELIMINARY REVIEW: Not Applicable ri (no approval/review required) DATE: 12/06/16 Structural Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: n APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: DUE DATE: 01/03/17 Approved Corrections Required ❑ Approved with Conditions nDenied (corrections entered in Reviews) (ie: Zoning Issues) Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg 0 Fire ❑ Ping 0 PW 0 Staff Initials: 12/18/2013 PERMIT COORD COPY,. PLAN REVIEW/ROUTING SLIP PERMIT NUMBER: D16-0310 DATE: 11/14/16 PROJECT NAME: RWC GROUP SITE ADDRESS: 13123 48 AVE S X Original Plan Submittal Revision # before Permit Issued Response to Correction Letter # Revision # after Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: AA cot60-- IH7-tk Building Division ing ItuM N.1 ' -t5 -( D blic Wo WY4' Fire Prevention Structural &Or(1Z II 4 -if, Planning Division 111 nPermit Coordinator 1111 PRELIMINARY REVIEW: Not Applicable n (no approval/review required) DATE: 11/15/16 Structural Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: n APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: DUE DATE: 12/13/16 Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions n Corrections Required M„— Denied (corrections entered in Reviews) (ie: Zoning Issues) Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: �j� Departments issued corrections: Bldg Fire P1ngk"”' PW ❑ Staff lnitials:l 12/18/2013 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov REVISION SUBMITTAL Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: I a- /1 I /( Plan Check/Permit Number: D16-0310 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner ❑ Deferred Submittal # Project Name: RWC GROUP Contact Person: /5 ,,t/ /Q4/ �U h f1� dJ14 � a 01 Phone Number: 6' - p %2 )5 9 j? Summary of Revision: 144/ P Plt145 Cul d t 7r 1//cc+ RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA DEC 01 2016 PERMIT CENTER Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: �— Entered in TRAKiT on W:\Permit Center\ Applications-Handouts\Templates \Forms\Word Documents \Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: August 2015 Greg Sullivan Concrete Home Espanol Contact Safety & Health Claims & Insurance 0 Washington State Department of Labor & industries Search L&I Page 1 of 2 A-% Index Help My L&1 Workplace Rights Trades & Licensing Greg Sullivan Concrete Owner or tradesperson Sullivan, Gregory Glen Principals Sullivan, Gregory Glen, OWNER WA UBI No. 603 062 776 3413 Sportsmans Way HELENA, MT 59602 406-459-9715 Business type Individual License Verify the contractor's active registration / license / certification (depending on trade) and any past violations. Construction Contractor Active. Meets current requirements. License specialties GENERAL License no. GREGSSC903QN Effective — expiration 11/15/2010-11/10/2018 Bond CBIC Bond account no. SLI015 Received by L&I 10/13/2016 $12,000.00 Effective date 10/12/2016 Expiration date Until Canceled Bond history Insurance Nautilus Ins Co $1,000,000.00 Policy no. NN735602 Received by L&I Effective date 11/10/2016 11/02/2016 Expiration date 11/02/2017 Insurance history Savings No savings accounts during the previous 6 year period. Lawsuits against the bond or savings No lawsuits against the bond or savings accounts during the previous 6 year period. L&I Tax debts No L&I tax debts are recorded for this contractor license during the previous 6 year period, but some debts may be recorded by other agencies. License Violations No license violations during the previous 6 year period. 1 i Help us improve https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/Detail.aspx?UBI=603062776&LIC=GREGSSC903QN&SAW= 12/12/2016 I6'-6" 8" 20'-0" SHADE FABRIC IS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO ANY PREDICTED SNOW EVENT WHERE GROUND SNOW HEIGHT IS FORECASTED TO EXCEED 2.5 INCHES 1/4 SHOP I. HSS 10x0.625 ROUND COLUMN 2. HSS 10X0.312 ROUND BEAM H ,-1[7f_ —� - 431 v\ v\ 3. BASE PLATE; SEE DETAIL 3, DWG S2 4. COLUMN -BEAM CONNECTOR PER DETAIL 4, DWG S2 \\-°' i I5'-6" ENTRY HEIGHT CONCRETE PIER; SEE DETAIL I, DWG S2 STRUCTURE ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE JOHN SKWIOT, PE 4235 E WOODLAND DR PHOENIX, AZ 85048 T: 602.888.7053 CONTACT@FJSENGINEERING.COM ENGINEERING DESIGN 1 CONSULTING 23'± SEE DETAIL I, THIS SHEET 26'-0' OR 27'-0" (VARIES) r 0 0 0 REVISIONS DATE REV. DESCRIPTION s2 ------------- LOW 7/32" 0 — 7X19 GALV. CABLE HORIZONTAL SAG=3'-0" 7/32" 0 — 7X19 GALV. CABLE HORIZONTAL SAG=2'-6" 7/32" 0 — 7X19 GALV. CABLE HORIZONTAL SAG=3'-0" CONCRETE PIER; SEE DETAIL 1, DWG S2 7/32" 0 - 7X19 GALV. CABLE HORIZONTAL SAG=2'-6" STRUCTURE PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE 'NI NET 5711 W. WASHINGTON PHOENIX, AZ 85043 1-800-290-3387 WWW. SHADE—N-NET. COM PLATE; SEE DETAIL 2, DWG S2 1 1 1 1 Fri REVISIONS No changes shall hr rnade to the scope of work witlio'; prior approval of ti't Vila Building Division. NOTE: S •;;:ions will require a new plan submittal and may include additional plan review fees. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 14 2016 PERMIT CENTER c. c. i / subject to el 1,;:p o al of construction document the violation of nny ;t.tc~ c or of approvz F.:.;:d Copy and cond;tio By: Date:.__/44Z2,14(,,_ City of Tukwii BUILDING DIVI yin rare and on/T2sions. s is aackncwledcjorJ: RWC GROUP CANOPIES 13123 48TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WA 98168 DESIGNER: JS SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: JH APPROVED: 09/24/2016 DATE: 09/16/2016 PROJ. NO. SNAZ-16-32. 1 ON _ •,_4 .� . . t. _*Eizsir ical Fiumbing p'Gas Piping City of Tuke.'•a REVI CODE C MPLIANCE AP ROVED DEC,`0 9NED 2416FOR City of Tukwila BUILDING DIVISION \/ I. 3-#5 TIES IN TOP 5" 2. HSS COLUMN 3. PIER FOOTING 4. (8) #6's VERTICAL @ EQUAL SPACING 5. #5 TIES @ 12" O.C. 6. BASE PLATE PER DETAIL 3 7. GROUND SURFACE 14" I. BASE PLATE: 18" x 18" x I" D O 2. BASE PLATE BI: (8) I -1/8"O x 12" LENGTH ANCHOR BOLTS PER ASTM F1554 (36 KSI); 3. HSS COLUMN 4. 3/8" THICK x 4" TALL X 3" WIDE CHAMFERED l/4" /\ STIFFENER PLATES TYP. STRUCTURAL STEEL: ALL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM STANDARD A - 36, EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: I. BOLTS AND PLAIN ANCHORS: ASTM - 307 AND ASTM - FI554 - 36. 2. TUBE STEEL: ASTM A - 500 GRADE B. 3. PIPE STEEL: ASTM A35 GR B 4. STRANDED CABLE WITH ZINC COATING: CLASS A, MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH EQUALS 200 KSI CODES AND STANDARDS: 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE ASCE 7 - 10: MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES CONCRETE: ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: 0 3/I6"7( 0 11" 4 13" 54 54 11ii 4 12" BASE PLATE NOT TO SCALE ( II 14" 162" ACI 301-10; SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ACI 318-08; BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE CONCRETE PROPERTIES: MINIMUM 28 DAY APPLICATION: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DRILLED PIERS 2,500 PSI I. BEAM 0 WHEN THE SIDES OF GRADE BEAMS OR PIER CAPS ARE EARTH -FORMED, EACH SIDE SHALL BE WIDENED AT LEAST 3 INCHES MORE THAN THE REQUIRED DIMENSION. THE MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCING SHALL BE INCREASED ACCORDINGLY BY THE SAME AMOUNT. EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE (BEAMS, COLUMNS, WALLS, ETC.) SHALL BE CHAMFERED 3/4 INCH, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. COLUMN 6' -0" 3. (2) 5/8" PLATE w/ (6) 3/4" x 2" M.B.; ONE PLATE WELDED TO COLUMN & OTHER TO BEAM DESIGN CRITERIA: 4 4. 8" HOLES 3" I- _J 2'-6" FOOTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTE: COLUMN -TO -BASE PLATE WELDS SHALL UTILIZE FILLER MATERIAL MEETING THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: I. YIELD STRENGTH: 58 KSI 2. TENSILE STRENGTH: 70 KSI 3. ELONGATION: 22% MIN. 4. CVN TOUGHNESS: 20 MIN. @ 0° F D 5. CAP PLATE OCCUPANCY CATEGORY: II BASIC WIND SPEED: 110 MPH EXPOSURE CATEGORY: B ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION: OPEN ROOF LIVE LOAD: 5 PSF SHOP I/ D REINFORCING STEEL: ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE DETAILED, FABRICATED, AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: ACI SP -66; ACI DETAILING MANUAL - 2004 CRSI MSP -I; MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE, 28TH EDITION, 2009 TYPICAL REINFORCING STEEL: 4 ,COLUMN -BEAM CONNECTOR NOT TO SCALE O 41" 8 216 I" 11 4167 SEISMIC LOAD: IMPORTANCE FACTOR, I SITE CLASS SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: Ss SI S DS S DI SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY ANALYSIS PROCEDURE PLAN VIEW I. HSS BEAM 2. PLATE ASSEMBLY; SEE DETAIL 5, THIS SHEET 3. Z" SHACKLE 4. 7X19 CABLE 5. 8" DIAMETER EYEBOLT 6. BRACKET 1/8 1. 16" STEEL PLATE 2. 16" SANDWICH PLATE 3. 8" COUPLER NUT 4. 8" DIAMETER EYEBOLT SEISMIC FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM 1.0 D 1.47 0.55 0.98 0.55 D EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE CANTILEVERED COLUMNS ALL WELDED REINFORCING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS DI.4. TACK WELDING DETAILED TO STEEL SPECIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. DEFORMED BARS (NON -WELDABLE) ASTM A6I5, GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS (WELDABLE) ASTM A706, GRADE 60 ALL REINFORCING BAR HOOKS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE ACI STANDARD HOOKS CONFORMING TO THE BEND DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS OF ACI 318, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE COLD BENT. BARS EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE FIELD BENT, EXCEPT WHEN SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CUT REINFORCEMENT UNLESS INDICATED BY SECTION OR DETAIL. AT LOCATIONS OF CONFLICT, SPREAD THE REINFORCEMENT TO ACCOMODATE PLACEMENT. ADD ADDITIONAL BARS IF NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN SPACING REQUIREMENTS. RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR, R 2.5 SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT, Cs 0.39 DESIGN BASE SHEAR, V (EACH COLUMN) 0.65 KIPS #II AND SMALLER BARS MAY BE SPLICED USING MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS OR CONTACT LAP SPLICES. BAR LAPS SHALL BE SECURELY WIRED TOGETHER. WELDING: SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS: ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURES: ISOLATED FOOTINGS -1500 PSF LATERAL BEARING 100 PSF/FT DI 2 CABLE TO BEAM CONNECTION NOT TO SCALE JOHN SKWIOT, PE 4235 E WOODLAND DR PHOENIX, AZ 85048 T: 602.888.7053 CONTACT@FJSENGINEERING.COM ENGINEERING DESIGN 1 CONSULTING REVISIONS DATE REV. PLATE DETAIL 5 NOT TO SCALE DESCRIPTION ALL WELDING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A WELDING PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION (WPS) PREQUALIFIED BY AWS DI.I. WPS NOT PREQUALIFIED BY AWS SHALL BE QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS DI.1 PRIOR TO USE ON THE PROJECT. WELDERS SHALL BE QUALIFIED FOR EACH WPS USED ON THE PROJECT BY AN AWS CERTIFIED TESTING AGENCY AND IN RECEIVE ACCORDANCE WITH AWS DI.I. CITY ®F TUE l SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE 'I\1 NET 5711 W. WASHINGTON PHOENIX, AZ 85043 -800-290-3387 WWW.SHADE-N-NET.COM NOV 14 201 RWC GROUP CANOPIES 13123 48Th AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WA 98168 DESIGNER: JS DRAWN BY: JH DATE: 09/16/2016 ILA 6 SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED: 09/24/2016 PROJ. NO.: SNAZ-I6-32 REVI CODE AF DE( Cit BUILC :WED FOR OMPLIANCE PROVED 0 9 2016 of Tukwila NG DIVI$IC'' .