HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL13-002 - CONTOUR ENGINEERING - SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD / GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSIONSC BV & GREEN RIVER TRAIL
CONDUIT EXTENSION
PL13-002
E13-001 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
L13-002 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
City (*Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Phone: 206-431-3670
Fax: 206-431-3665
Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
File Number: E13-001
Applied: 01/15/2013
Issue Date: 04/09/2013
Status: APPROVED
Applicant: CONTOUR ENGINEERING
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila
Description of Proposal:
COUNTOUR PROJ# 12-108 - CONDUIT EXTENSTION
Along a portion of the Green River Trail on the north side of I-405 from approximatley 68th Ave
South to Fort Dent Way and continuing from the northern most terminus of the Interurban Trail
crossing the pedestrian bridge towards Fun Center Way.
The project includes City of Tukwila and WSDOT controlled ROW, a city owned parcel (#2954900421)
and a privately owned parcel (#2423049092).
Location of Proposal:
Address:
Parcel Number:
Section/Township/Range:
0001
ALONG GREEN RIVER TRAIL FROM SC BV TO FT
The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under the option DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period.
Jack Pa. , Responsible Official
City of ,ti kwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd
Tukwila, WA 98188
(206)431-3670
Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action
unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to
appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075)
doc: DNSOP-8/07
E13-001 Printed: 04-11-2013
April 5, 2013
To:
City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director
NOTICE OF DECISION
Jeremy Haug, PE
Contour Engineering
3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
Kevin Kindle -rte`
SEFNCO Communications
4610 Tacoma Avenue
Sumner, WA 98390
Office of Attorney General
PROJECT:
FILE NUMBERS:
ASSOCIATED FILES:
APPLICANT:
REOUEST:
LOCATION:
King County Assessor "
King County Transit: c'_`">
SEPA Official
State Department of Ecology efe*-
SEPA Division
(checklist & site map attached
previously attached with Notice of
Application)
11.x.3
Southcenter Bridge & Green River Trail Conduit Extension
E13-001
PL13-002, L13-002
Jeremy Haug, PE of Contour Engineering, LLC for SEFNCO Communications
SEPA DNS, Options DNS process
Along the Green River Trail in the vicinity of I-405 and Interurban Avenue
This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non -significance
(DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application.
Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for
inspection at:
Tukwila Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
The project planner is Stacy MacGregor, who may be contacted at (206) 431-3670 for further information.
The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of
Washington (RCW 36.70C).
SM Page 1 of 1 03/28/2013
H:\PL113-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\SEPA NOD.doc
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
FINAL STAFF EVALUATION
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
File No: E13-001
I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION
Jini Haggerton, Mayor
Jack Pace, Director
The proposal is for extending a 4" conduit along a portion of the Green River trail. The conduit will be extended via
directional boring and bore pits will be spaced out along the project run.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Name: Southcenter Bridge & Green River Trail Conduit Extension
Applicant: Jeremy Haug, PE of Contour Engineering, LLC for SEFNCO Communications
Location: The site is located along the Green River trail in the vicinity of I-405 and Interurban Avenue.
The project extends from approximately Southcenter Boulevard at 66th Avenue South to Fort
Dent Way and over the pedestrian bridge to the Family Fun Center.
Zoning and Comprehensive
Plan Designation:
The project is primarily on public right of way (WSDOT and City of Tukwila) with the exception
that the landings for the pedestrian bridge are on a city -owned parcel zoned RCM -to the north
and a privately owned parcel zoned CLI to the south. The surrounding properties are zoned LDR,
RCM, C/LI and TUC.
The following information was considered as part of review of this application.
1. SEPA Checklist dated January, 2012.
2. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application (File L13-002).
3. Civil plan sheets C1-4 prepared by Contour Engineering dated 1/9/13.
4. Shoreline site plan sheets SP1 -3 prepared by Contour Engineering dated 1/8/13.
5. Shoreline Substantial Development permit file #L13-002.
NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of
exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Stacy MacGregor,
Assistant Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, and Phone: (206) 433-7166.
III. REVIEW PROCESS
The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does not meet the
SM
H:\PL113-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc
Page 1 of 4 03/28/2013
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
exemptions listed under WAC 197-11-800 (23). This proposal involves utility -related installation and construction of
communication lines on lands covered by water.
IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL
This application is for a portion of a larger project to install 4" communication conduit along a utility corridor. The
conduit will be installed via directional drilling; bore pits will be installed at intervals along the project's length. The
conduit will be installed adjacent to the Green River Trail as it runs along the northwest bank of the Green River. The
trail and conduit extension are principally in city -owned right-of-way. The application notes that a portion of the right-of-
way is under WSDOT control. The conduit will also cross over the Green River Trail pedestrian bridge. The north side
of the bridge is on a city -owned, undeveloped parcel (not right-of-way) and the south end of the bridge is a public access
easement on privately -owned and developed property.
V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The
numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the
applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or
clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation.
A. BACKGROUND:
1-5. Concur with checklist.
6. The construction will follow issuance of a SEPA determination and after obtaining all required permits
from the City of Tukwila or other agencies.
7-11. Concur with checklist.
12. The site is within the shoreline of the Green River.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS:
1. Earth:
a -g. Concur with checklist.
h. ESC measures as recommended in the KCSWM must be utilized.
2. Air:
a -c. Concur with checklist.
3. Water:
a(1). Concur with checklist.
a(2). The project scope was modified after the initial submittal to include extending conduit along the
Green River trail pedestrian bridge.
a(3-6). Concur with checklist.
b(1-2). Concur with checklist.
SM
H:\PL113-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc
Page 2 of 4 03/28/2013
c -d.
Surface water design and construction shall be per the King County Surface Water Design
Manual as adopted by the City of Tukwila. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated
as part of the construction permit. Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no
construction debris enters the storm drainage system. All impacts related to construction debris
will be mitigated as part of the construction permit.
4. Plants:
a. Concur with checklist
b. Tree removal in the shoreline requires a shoreline tree clearing permit. The project does not
include or authorize clearing of any trees.
c -d. Concur with checklist.
5. Animals:
a -b. Yes — This area is part of the Pacific Flyway, a primary corridor for migratory bird species.
Chinook Salmon, Steelhead Trout, and Bull Trout/Dolly Varden are all listed as "threatened"
under the Endangered Species Act and all three fish use the Green-Duwamish River system for
rearing and migration.
c -d. Concur with checklist.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a -c. Concur with checklist.
7. Environmental Health:
a(1-2). Concur with checklist.
b(1). Concur with checklist.
b(2-3). The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements. Construction activity is
exempt from noise permitting requirements during daytime house (7am- lOpm). Compliance
with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise
impacts associated with the project.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a. The work occurs in the public right of way and one two parcels. One parcel is owned by the City
of Tukwila, the other parcel is owned by a private property owner. Surrounding land uses include
residential, freeway and highway, public recreation trail, vacant land, and retail development.
b -d. Concur with checklist
e. The majority of the project is within public right-of-way. The north side of the pedestrian bridge
is zoned RCM and the south side of the bridge is zoned CLI.
f. Concur with checklist.
g. The Shoreline Master Program designation is Urban Conservancy to the east and Residential to
the west.
SM
H:\PL113-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc
Page 3 of 4 03/28/2013
h-1. Concur with checklist.
9. Housing:
a -c. Concur with checklist.
10. Aesthetics:
a -c. Concur with checklist.
11. Light and Glare:
a -d. Concur with checklist.
12. Recreation:
a -c. Concur with checklist.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation:
a -b. Concur with checklist.
c. Applicant will comply with all local, state, and federal laws in the case that archaeological or
paleontological artifacts are encountered.
14. Transportation:
a -g. Concur with checklist.
15. Public Services:
a -b. Concur with checklist.
16. Utilities:
a -b. Concur with checklist.
VI. COMMENTS:
On February 27, 2013 notice of application was posted on the site and published in the Seattle Times. The optional DNS
process in WAC 197-11-335 was used; a thirty day comment period was required due to the Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit application. Clarifying questions were asked by Karen Walters of the Muckleshoot Tribe. She
advised that, based on the work window, the contractors may see tribal members fishing in the vicinity. No other
comments were received during the single integrated comment period and this DNS will be issued without a second
comment period.
VII. CONCLUSION
The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC
197-11-340 a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued for this project. This DNS is based on impacts identified
within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File
No. E13-001, and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City of Tukwila for the exercise
of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions.
Prepared by: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner
Date: April 5, 2013
SM
H:\PL113-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc
Page 4 of 4 03/28/2013
PIease respond to al estions. Use separate sheets as necessar
Applicant Responses:
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
The conduit attached to the bridge will be along it's northern side and out of site people
using the trail.
11, Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
Not Applicable
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
Not Applicable
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Not Applicable
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011:doc
SEPA Checklist
Agency Comments
Page 15
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all q ions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The I-405 on and off -ramp overpass as well as the SR 181 (Interurban Ave S) bridge, both
crossing above the Green River Trail perpendicular to the proposed conduit. In addition,
the pedestrian foot bridge of the Green River Trail.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Project is within public right-of-way and public lands
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The project area is within public right-of-way and does not have a comprehensive plan
designation.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Urban Conservancy Environment
li:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA E
r117-
oninettal Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 12
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
None
3. Water
a. Surface:
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
The Green River is in some areas approximately 60' off of the proposed conduit
alignment to the East -Southeast along the Green River Trail. The Green River merges
into the Duwamish River approximately 1.25 miles downstream where it continues to
flow to the Northwest and into the Puget Sound.
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes. The project is located adjacent to and parallel to the Green River, along its
North -Northwest side, within the 200 -ft jurisdictional shoreline area. The conduit
extending over the pedestrian foot bridge will be over the river. See the attached Site
Plan Exhibit. No work is proposed within/below the OHWM of the river.
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Not applicable
H:1Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Veb >°.°
4\41 \ \°14°
Page 5
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
SEPA Checklist
Public Works Permit
WSDOT Utility Franchise Permit
10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask
you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page.
The proposed project will extend 4" PVC conduit approximately 1,100 LF along the Green
River Trail from Southcenter Blvd to Fort Dent Way. Conduit will be installed via
underground directional boring with several bore pits required along the alignment. There will
also be approximately 6 vaults spaced along the conduit run with one at each end of the
alignment. From Fort Dent Way, the conduit will be further extended approximately 310 LF
along the Green River Train directly attached to the pedestrian foot bridge where it will then
terminate on the SE side of the bridge.
11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot
number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The project is in the SW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 23 N, Range 4 E, W.M.
A Vicinity Map and a proposed plan exhibit is included at the end of this checklist.
The project area is to the NW of I-405 at the Interurban Ave Exit, approximately from the
Interurban Ave bridge over the Green River to the Southcenter Blvd bridge over the Green
River along the Green River Trail.
12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
Yes
HAU.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA nvironmenta1 Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc
Page 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name: Southcenter Boulevard and Green River Trail Conduit Extension
Contour Engineering, LLC, has applied for a SEPA review and Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit. The project is located on public rights-of-way along the Green River Trail and on City -owned
and private property on either end of the Green River Trail pedestrian bridge.
Permits applied for include: E13-001 SEPA Environmental Review, L13-002 Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit, PW13-002.
FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development
(DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD within thirty
days of this notice to the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., March 29, 2013.
Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a
determination of non -significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used.
There will be a single integrated comment period for the notice of application and likely threshold
determination so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the
project. This proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the project review
process may incorporate or require mitigation measures.
APPEALS
You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling
DCD at (206) 431-3670. A decision related to Design Review is made by the Board of Architectural
Review and may be appealed to the Tukwila City Council. The Department will provide you with
information or appeals if you are interested.
For further information on this proposal, contact Stacy MacGregor at (206) 431-3670 or visit our offices
at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Application Filed: 1/15/2013 Notice of Completeness: 2/13/13 Notice of Application: 2/27/13
at* of Ju11wita
Department Of Community Development
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
I, _Teri
Svedahl ,
HEREBY DECLARE THAT:
E13-001, L13-002
x
Notice of Application for a
SEPA Determination
Mailer's signature:
Notice of Decision
Notice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting
Determination of Non-
Significance
Mitigated Determination of Non -
Significance
Determination of
Significance & Scoping
Notice
Short Subdivision Agenda
Notice of Application for
Shoreline Mgmt Permit
Shoreline Mgmt Permit
Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet
Official Notice
Notice of Action
Other:
Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached
on this _27 day of February_, _2013
Project Name: CONTOUR ENGINEERING - Conduit extension Green River Trail
over pedestrian bridge at Family Fun Center
Project Number: PL13-002
Associated File Number (s):
E13-001, L13-002
Mailing requested by: S . c
acGregor
Mailer's signature:
7/V'/Cel
W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC
PL13-002 City of Tukwila Notice of Application for a SEPA Determination and
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Green River Trail from Southcenter Parkway to Family Fun Center and over the Pedestrian Bridge
et
Project
Location
rd_St? Trerrii'a`
tkvailr
'ark
Property Owner : City of Tukwila
Project Applicant: Contour Enginering, LLC
Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor, 206-433-7166
Project Description: This application is for extending 4" PVC
conduit along the Green River Trail from Southcetner Paricway
to Fort Dent Way and along the pedestrian bridge over the Green
. may Fun Cont River.
Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environ-
mental
impacts and expects to issue a determination of non-
'r;*•�Z significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11
-355 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment
period for the notice of application and likely threshold determi-
nation so this may be your only opportunity to comment on
the environmental impacts of the project. This proposal may
11 include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the
y project review process may incorporate or require mitigation
tom
measures.
You are receiving this notice because you are
a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this
project.
Comments and Appeals: You may review the application
and submit written comments on the project to DCD, 6300
Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by
5:OOpm on (30 days) March 29 2013. You may request a
copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by
calling 206-433-7166.
PL13-002 City of Tukwila Notice of Application for a SEPA Determination and
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Green River Trail from Southcenter Parkway to Family Fun Center and over the Pedestrian Bridge
Property Owner : City of Tukwila
Project Applicant: Contour Enginering, LLC
\ Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor, 206-433-7166
Project
ocation- ot
i
Si3ret-i_ Tom-
ukwilri
a a7rk
Project Description: This application is for extending 4" PVC
conduit along the Green River Trail from Southcetner Parkway
to Fort Dent Way and along the pedestrian bridge over the Green
May Fun Ccni River.
, Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environ-
mental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non -
Ti= y. , significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11
-355 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment
ion period for the notice of application and likely threshold determi-
nation so this may be your only opportunity to comment on
the environmental impacts of the project. This proposal may
include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the
-� ins project review process may incorporate or require mitigation
measures.
1I
%ver rr-W1
tt
You are receiving this notice because you are
a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this
project.
Comments and Appeals: You may review the application
and submit written comments on the project to DCD, 6300
Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by
5:OOpm on (30 days) March 29 2013. You may request a
copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by
calling 206-433-7166.
PL13-002 City of Tukwila Notice of Application for a SEPA Determination and
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Green River Trail from Southcenter Parkway to Family Fun Center and over the Pedestrian Bridge
Proje
Location
�
15\\;t7W.:;-°-T *wit,
Purl:
Gu is t' wy �,.
N,verrroit
You are receiving this notice because you are
a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this
project.
Property Owner : City of Tukwila
Project Applicant: Contour Enginering, LLC
Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor, 206-433-7166
Project Description: This application is for extending 4" PVC
conduit along the Green River Trail from Southcetner Parkway
to Fort Dent Way and along the pedestrian bridge over the Green
Fun Cent River.
Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environ-
mental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non-
significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11
-355 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment
period for the notice of application and likely threshold determi-
nation so this may be your only opportunity to comment on
the environmental impacts of the project. This proposal may
include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the
project review process may incorporate or require mitigation
measures.
A
BLitt
Comments and Appeals: You may review the application
and submit written comments on the project to DCD, 6300
Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by
5:OOpm on (30 days) March 29 2013. You may request a
copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by
calling 206-433-7166.
PL13-002 City of Tukwila Notice of Application for a SEPA Determination and
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Green River Trail from Southcenter Parkway to Family Fun Center and over the Pedestrian Bridge
l is
Project\J
Location -4
1$6
ukwt7�
Park
w,,
I� n ver tam
Property Owner : City of Tukwila
Project Applicant: Contour Enginering, LLC
Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor, 206-433-7166
\ Project Description: This application is for extending 4" PVC
conduit along the Green River Trail from Southcetner Parkway
to Fort Dent Way and along the pedestrian bridge over the Green
anti:, Fun Cent River.
X14
You are receiving this notice because you are
a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this
project.
Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environ-
mental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non-
significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11
-355 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment
period for the notice of application and likely threshold determi-
nation so this may be your only opportunity to comment on
the environmental impacts of the project. This proposal may
include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the
project review process may incorporate or require mitigation
measures.
Comments and Appeals: You may review the application
and submit written comments on the project to DCD, 6300
Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by
5:OOpm on (30 days) March 29 2013. You may request a
copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by
calling 206-433-7166.
US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS
OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
WSDOT NW REGION
DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
WA FISHERIES & WILDLIFE
DEPT OF ECOLOGY
WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
KC DEV & ENVIRON SERVICES
KC METRO TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL
OWEST COMMUNICATIONS
SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT
SEATTLE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
COMCAST
BP OLYMPIC PIPELINE
VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT
WATER DISTRICT #20
WATER DISTRICT #125
CITY OF RENTON
SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES
MUCKLESHOOT Cultural Resources Program
MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program
MUCKLESHOOT Wildlife Program
DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
SOUND TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL
DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN UP COALITION
PEOPLE FOR PUGET SOUND
Countour Engineering LLC
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
NW REGIONAL OFFICE
ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT
ACCOUNTING DIVISION
SEPA INFO CENTER
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY DIV
WATER DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
Laura Murphy
Karen Walter
Mike Middleton
UNION STATION
Jeremy Haug PE
4735 E MARGINAL WY S
PO BOX 48343
PO BOX 330310, MS 240
PO 47015
16018 MILL CREEK BLVD
3190 160th AVE SE
PO BOX 40117
500 4th AVE, RM# 709A
900 OAKSDALE AVE SW
201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-TR-0431
23315 66th AVE S
PO BOX 34023
PO BOX 90868
23828 30th AVE S
PO BOX 34019
12645 STONE AVE N
2319 LIND AVENUE SW
PO BOX 69550
12606 1st AVE S
PO BOX 68147
1055 S GRADY WAY
PO BOX 34018
39015 172nd AVE SE
39015 172nd AVE SE
39015 172nd AVE SE
4705 W MARGINAL WAY SW
401 S JACKSON STREET
1620 18TH AVE, Ste 100
911 WESTERN AVENUE, STE 580
3309 56th St NW, Suite 106
SEATTLE WA 98124
OLYMPIA WA 98504
SEATTLE WA 98133
OLYMPIA WA 98504
MILL CREEK WA 98012
BELLEVUE WA 98008
LACEY WA 98504
SEATTLE WA 98104
RENTON WA . 98055
SEATTLE WA 98104
KENT WA 98032
SEATTLE WA 98124
BELLEVUE WA 98009
KENT WA 98032
SEATTLE WA 98124
SEATTLE WA 98133
RENTON WA 98055
SEATTLE WA 98168
SEATTLE WA 98168
SEATTLE WA 98168
RENTON WA 98055
SEATTLE WA 98124
AUBURN WA 98092
AUBURN WA 98092
AUBURN WA 98092
SEATTLE WA 98106
SEATTLE WA 98104
SEATTLE WA 98122
SEATTLE WA 98104
Gig Harbor WA 98335
NAME
& Wells
*
*
Robert E
*
Michael D
*
Lilly Wong
TUKWILA
TUKWILA
Dana Yoko
TUKWILA
TUKWILA
TUKWILA
Marguerite
Roland C
Gerald A
TUKWILA
Sarah
TUKWILA
Morales Jose R
TUKWILA
Hanh & Joel
TUKWILA
David
TUKWILA
TUKWILA
*
*
COMFORT
SUNRISE
BAJIO MEXICAN
SUBWAY
LAST NAME
Bain
KWAN FAMILY L L C
JOHN C RADOVICH LLC
Kubarek
TUKWILA CITY OF
Alhadeff
SCHNEIDER HOMES INC
Lee
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Nakamura
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Woo
Mccamey
Tra u b
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Swezey
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Alocer
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Mortenson
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Rodriguez
ADDRESS
1270 KARROW AVE
18501 BRITTANY DR SW
2835 82ND AVE SE # 300
3475 WOODRIDGE PKWY
6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD
6305 BEACH DR SW
6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD STE
6530 S 153RD ST
6530 S 153RD ST # A
6530 S 153RD ST # F
6532 S 153RD ST
6532 5 153RD ST # B
6533 S 153RD ST # G
6534 S 153RD ST # C
6534 S 153RD UNIT C
6535 S 153RD ST # H
6536 S 153RD ST
6536 S 153RD ST # D
6537 S 153RD ST
6537 S 153RD ST # I
6538 S 153RD ST
6538 S 153RD ST # E
6542 S 154TH
6542 SOUTHCENTER BLVD
6550 SOUTHCENTER BLVD
COMMUNITY MEMBER 6715 FORT DENT WAY
COMMUNITY MEMBER 6720 FORT DENT WAY
LINDEBLAD JAMES R#2484: 7517 GREENWOOD AVE N
WSDOT
SUITES
DENTAL
GRILL
SHOP
PO BOX 47338
7200 FUN CENTER WAY
7100 FUN CENTER WAY #100
7100 FUNCENTER WAY #140
7100 FUNCENTER WAY # 150
CITY ST ZIP
WHITEFISH MT 59937
SEATTLE WA 98166
MERCER ISLAND WA 98040
PALM HARBOR FL 34684
TUKWILA WA 98188
SEATTLE WA 98136
1 TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98108
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98178
TUKWILLA WA 98188
TUKWILLA WA 98188
SEATTLE WA 98103
OLYMPIA WA 98504
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
TUKWILA WA 98188
GRANITE TRANSFORMATIONS 7100 FUNCENTER WAY # 130 TUKWILA WA 98188
EURO ASIA 7100 FUNCENTER WAY # 101 TUKWILA WA 98188
WASHINGTON CHIROPRACTIC 7100 FUNCENTER WAY #120 TUKWILA WA 98188
FAMILY FUN CENTER HEADQUARTERS 7100 FUN CETNER WAY TUKWILA WA 98188
STATE FARM INS 6835 FORT DENT WAY TUKWILA WA 98188
TAHOMA CLINIC 6835 FORT DENT WAY TUKWILA WA 98188
Lee Charles Comfort Suites 28904 5TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003
Parcels within
the 500 ft
buffer but do
not have
address
3200007
3200025
2423049013
2423049092
2954900445
J co k -s s 772' a �v� \ W\-1
t o F v s CA"... -VA \NA y J b bMA - �.
A -& 'CG,.` 711s-
CA'` II\/G
o tbickf,„_ G\
t �jb
\i‘r
��„ �� X30
fro
X24230490113
•
;3597000500)
3597000520
00:03213'_0001
0003200025
' el
fttli
`r _' ip ,u ifW.F1r .
'�
4,
surbT'i 4!
�_ s_.,'
iir
—.)— tri tt
l.` 1a._ . .
441
500' Buffer
PL13-002 Buffer Line
1 Parcels within the 500' buffer but no address yet
Parcels within 500' buffer
ctr
•
4,11) to Cit'
L Parcel Not Int on
Of 1
Rett VHW
C1E-1
PDF ps
Battle C'7Lime.
-Notice Details -
These are the details of your notice scheduled to run on the dates indicated below.
Prepayment Information
Date Method
02/19/13 CC
Card Type
AMEX
Last 4 Digits Check # Amount
1040
$431.32
Account Information
Account #: 448713
Advertiser Name:
Agency Name:
Contact: Kevin Kindle
Sefnco Communications
Address: 4610 Tacoma Avenue S.
Sumner, WA 98390
Telephone: (866) 492-9650
Notice Placement Information
Notice ID:
Purchase Order #:
# of lines:
Total NET Cost:
Class Name:
290872
Job# 70164
41
$431.32
Public Notices
Legals Desk Contact Information
Phone # (206) 652-6018
Email: Legals@seattletimes.com
Run Date(s)
Seattle Times 02/27/13
NWclassifieds 02/27/13
NWclassifieds 02/28/13
NWclassifieds 03/01/13
NWclassifieds 03/02/13
NWclassifieds 03/03/13
NWclassifieds 03/04/13
NWclassifieds 03/05/13
.The ad preview below may not be to actual scale
City of Tukwila
Notice of Application
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tuk-
wila has received application for a Shore-
line Substantial Development permit and
request for a SEPA determination.
FILE NUMBER:E13-001, L13-002, PL13-002,
Job 70164
APPLICANT:Contour Engineering, LLC
REQUEST: A utility project to extend a
4" conduit along portions of the Green Riv-
er Trail. Bore pits will be spaced along the
length of the project. The project request
includes a Shoreline Substantial Develop-
ment Permit and SEPA Determination of
Non -Significance.
LOCATION:Along the Green River Trail
from Southcenter Boulevard to Fort Dent
Way and continuing over the pedestrian
bridge crossing the Green River. The proi-
ect is on City of Tukwila and WSDOT right
of way.
An environmental checklist has been
submitted. To review the files, you may
request them at the counter of the Depart-
ment of Community Development (DCD),
6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila,
98188. Public comments are requested
and must be delivered to DCD at the ad-
dress above or postmarked no later than
5:00 PM on March 29th, 2013. You may
request additional information, a copy of
any decision and your appeal rights by
calling the project planner at 206-433-7166
or visiting the offices at the address listed
above.
Published: February 27, 2013, Seattle Times
ENGINEERING • L L C
CIVIL ENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING 0 LAND PLANNING
January 9, 2013
City of Tukwila
Planning & Community Development
3309 56th St. NW, Suite #106
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
Phone: 253-857-5454
Fax: 253-509-0044
Email: infocontourpllc.com
Re: General Project Description Summary and "No net Toss" response for Southcenter Blvd &
Green River Trail Conduit Extension
Dear City of Tukwila,
This summary accompanies the Substantial Shoreline Development package for the Southcenter
Boulevard & Green River Trail Conduit Extension.
General Project Description Summary
The proposed utility project is to extend a 4" communication conduit along the Green River Trail from
Southcenter Boulevard to Fort Dent Way. The conduit will be extended via directional drilling so bore
pits will be required and spaced out along the project run.
Currently, the project area is within Tukwila public right-of-way, except at two locations where the
bore path will cross WSDOT right of way, beneath the bridge spans of SR 181, and the westbound 1-
405 on and off -ramp. The bridge abutments and retaining walls are the only structures within the
project area. The Green River Trial is an asphalt paved trail which follows along the river and crosses
beneath the two bridges. The conduit path will be located along the northwest side of the trail with
the bore pits designed to be outside of the paved path. Vegetation will be re -planted and/or re-
established at bore pit locations.
This project will not add to or increase the intensity of the area and will not add any new impervious
surfaces. No modifications to the shoreline of the Green River are proposed so there is no loss of
shoreline function. No pedestrian access to the trail will be impeded by the project.
"No net Toss" response
1. The existing shoreline and riverbank area are currently vegetated with native deciduous trees and
brush. The slope of the bank is approximately 2:1 which is covered with blackberry, brushes and
other type's vegetation. No visible evidence of erosion exists within the 200' shoreline area. An
existing asphalt paved pedestrian pathway (Green River Trail) exists just above the top of slope.
An existing underground utility corridor along the pathway exists which also includes light
standards along the path.
Two bridges span the river in the project area. Columns are constructed within the slope of the
river.
2. The proposed conduit project will not change or negatively affect the existing condition of the
shoreline.
3. (See attached sheet)
4. a. Minimal open trenching is to take place to preserve existing vegetation.
b. Directional boring technology is to be utilized.
c. Areas of bore pits affected will be re -vegetated.
d. Minimal maintenance will be required for the conduit.
e. Not Applicable.
f. Monitoring of the project impacts is to be done by contractor.
Please contact me with any questions or if additional information is requested.
Sinc9rely,
Jere y F. Haug, P.E.
Contour Engineering, LLC
3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Gig Harbor, Washington 98335
S 152nd St
TtivA
Crysta.
44 ?,$ SouthcenteT Flab
Nrestfield
Suab;C:1,
Baker Blvd
SITE
Bazirg Longacwi
it:dustrial Park
a
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
NO NET LOSS CHECKLIST
What is No Net Loss?
The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) requires protection of the natural resources and
ecological functions of the shoreline environment. Ecological functions are processes that characterize the
river and its shoreline and form habitats for water- and land-based wildlife and vegetation. Ecological
processes depend on the geology, soil type, topography, climate, and other physical characteristics in the
region. In the Green/Duwamish River watershed, key ecological processes include:
• river flows, tidal fluctuations and saltwater influences;
• creation, transport and deposition of sediment (for example scouring of soils, and erosion and
formation of mud -flats or beaches);
• transport of nutrients (from decomposition of plants and other organic materials);
• provision of woody debris from fallen limbs and trees along the banks or in the water (the trunks
and branches help form pools for fish); and
• water quality (such as vegetation that can help to filter out pollutants that are washed into the river
from parking lots and vegetation that can help reduce temperatures in the river, important for fish,
especially salmon).
These physical and biological processes comprise the ecological functions of the shoreline.
The state guidelines that implement the SMA, adopted in 2003, establish the standard of "no net loss" of
shoreline ecological functions for land uses and development within the shoreline jurisdiction. The No Net
Loss standard is designed to stop the introduction of new negative impacts to shoreline ecological functions
resulting from new development. Tukwila's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) defines no net loss as a:
"...standard intended to ensure that shoreline development or uses, whether permitted or exempt, are
located and designed to avoid loss or degradation of shoreline ecological functions that are
necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources."
In other words, the existing conditions of the shoreline ecological functions should not deteriorate due to new
permitted development or new land use. A loss of ecological function can occur when a physical condition
such as vegetation along the shoreline is removed or when habitat is altered through the construction of a
dock or pier or other structures over this habitat. In order to maintain shoreline ecological functions,
negative impacts must be mitigated to restore an equivalent amount of ecological function. The approach to
mitigation must follow the mitigation sequencing steps adopted in the SMP (see next page). It should be
noted that the SMA and the City's SMP also require improvement of shoreline functions, and therefore, some
re -vegetation of the shoreline will be required in proportion to the scale of the project, regardless of whether
there is a net loss to ecological functions.
CPL Page 13 of 14
W:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Pennits\4-i 1-12 SSDP
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
On a separate sheet of paper, please respond to the following questions to evaluate your
project's impacts and assist in analyzing whether there will be a net loss to shoreline
ecological functions requiring mitigation:
1. Describe the existing condition of the shoreline area and riverbank. For example, what plants and
how much vegetation currently exist within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction; what is the condition
of the shoreline (how steep are the banks, is there any erosion or slope failure, what are the soils like);
is there "hard armoring" on the riverbank (for example, concrete or wooden bulkheads, metal sheet
piling, rip -rap [rocks or concrete/asphalt blocks]), is there paving or are there any structures within the
200 ft. shoreline jurisdiction; are there any docks, piers, decks or other structures near or over the
water; are there any above -ground or below ground utilities; etc.?
2. How will your project change the existing condition of the shoreline described above?
3. Please respond to the questions in the following chart - A No Net Loss analysis (prepared by a
qualified biologist) must be prepared if the response to any of the questions in the chart below is
"yes":
4. The way to achieve no net loss of ecological function is to mitigate the loss through one or a
combination of the mitigation sequencing steps identified below. If preparing a No Net Loss analysis,
please discuss how your project addresses the following mitigation sequencing steps (TMC 18.44.070
H.3.):
a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation
by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment;
d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations;
e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or
environments; and
f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective
measures.
CPL Page 14 of 14
w:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Permits\4-11-12 SSDP
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
WILL THE PROJECT:
NO
YES
a.
Alter/remove vegetation in the shoreline jurisdiction?
X
b.
Alter the river bank (i.e. re -slope bank, add armoring etc.)?
le
c.
Add fill in the shoreline jurisdiction?
ie
d.
Discharge new stormwater to the river?
X
e.
Store or use hazardous materials in the shoreline jurisdiction?
X
f.
Construct an in- or over -water structure?
X
g.
Increase impervious surface in the shoreline jurisdiction?
X
4. The way to achieve no net loss of ecological function is to mitigate the loss through one or a
combination of the mitigation sequencing steps identified below. If preparing a No Net Loss analysis,
please discuss how your project addresses the following mitigation sequencing steps (TMC 18.44.070
H.3.):
a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation
by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment;
d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations;
e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or
environments; and
f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective
measures.
CPL Page 14 of 14
w:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Permits\4-11-12 SSDP
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
ENGINEERING•L L C
SEPA CHECKLIST
FOR
SOUTHCENTER BLVD & GREEN
RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT
EXTENSION
CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
JANUARY 2013
Prepared For:
SEFNCO Communications
Attn. Kevin Kindle
4610 Tacoma Ave
Sumner, WA 98390
Prepared By: ������
Jeremy F. Haug, P.E., Project Enginee
tiAN 15 2013
Project # 12-108
DEVELOPMENT
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
City of Tukwila
Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist
Date: 01/08/2013
Applicant Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
SEFNCO Communications
4610 Tacoma Ave
Sumner, WA 98390
(253) 299-8587
DIRECTIONS:
This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of
Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist
includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page
2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by
the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas
studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if
"take" is indicated.
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc •
Page 1
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but
not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
1-0
Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or
creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the
earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2-0
YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3)
2-0
Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed,
through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the
appropriate response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 3-0
YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4)
3-0
Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark
that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of
waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to
vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 4-0
YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5)
4-0
Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This
does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid,
solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of
quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington
Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site
during construction. Please mark the appropriate response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 5-0
YES - Continue to Question 5-0
5-0
Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects
that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water
withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects
installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects
that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a
geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 6-0
YES - Continue to Question 6-0
6-0
Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of
fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers.
Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials
arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490).
For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the
appropriate response.
✓
NO — Checklist Complete
YES — Checklist Complete
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201l .doc
Page 2
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part B: Please answer each quest. below for projects that include grading _teview each question carefully,
considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential
emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for
each No or Yes answer.
1-1
iNO
Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black
Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require
grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water
mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate
response.
- Continue to Question 1-2
YES - Continue to Question 1-2
1-2
Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or
increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black
River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or
sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have
not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100
percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes
to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not
require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in
erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark
the appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 1-3
✓
YES - Continue to Question 1-3
1-3
Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those
hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered
the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off
the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural
conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete
paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns
existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response.
iNO
- Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 1-4
1-4
Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on
site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and
management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or
through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of
impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically
designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2)
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 3
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part C: Please review each question, oelow for projects that include clearing. Keview each question carefully,
considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential
emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for
each No or Yes answer.
2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the
Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response.
✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 2-2
2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse
or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody
plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and
potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response.
✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-3
YES - Continue to Question 2-3
2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark
of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means
any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate
response.
✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-4
YES - Continue to Question 2-4
2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the
Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response.
1 NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 2-5
2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the
Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response.
✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2)
H:Uand Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 4
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part D: Please review each question oelow for projects that include work betow the ordinary high water mark
of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully,
considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential
emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for
each No or Yes answer.
3-1
✓
Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish
rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high
water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the
normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark
the appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-2
YES - Continue to Question 3-2
3-2
Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the
Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a
surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids.
This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from
channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for
juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent
modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert,
culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access
should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 3-3
YES - Continue to Question 3-3
3-3
Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to
salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this
analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the
natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark
the appropriate response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 3-4
YES - Continue to Question 3-4
3-4
Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the
Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a
profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left
bank. Please mark the appropriate response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 3-5
YES - Continue to Question 3-5
3-5
Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or
the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to
fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building
materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black
Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate
response.
✓
NO - Continue to Question 3-6
YES - Continue to Question 3-6
H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 5
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part D (continued)
3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support
salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the
watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable,
nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values"
rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should
be included. Please mark the appropriate response.
• NO - Continue to Question 3-7
YES - Continue to Question 3-7
3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse
containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands
includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly
waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate
response.
• NO - Continue to Question 3-8
YES - Continue to Question 3-8
3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but
is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures.
Please mark the appropriate response.
✓ NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2)
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 6
SEPA Checklist
STATE ENVIR ► MENTAL POLICY A CHECKLIST
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Southcenter Blvd & Green River Trail Conduit Extension
2. Name of Applicant:
SEFNCO Communications
3. Date checklist prepared:
01/08/2013
4. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Begin when all necessary permits are obtained, Winter -Spring 2013
6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No
7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
None
8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None known
II:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Agency Comments
Page 1
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
SEPA Checklist
Public Works Permit
WSDOT Utility Franchise Permit
10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask
you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page.
The proposed project will extend 4" PVC conduit approximately 1,100 LF along the Green
River Trail from Southcenter Blvd to Fort Dent Way. Conduit will be installed via
underground directional boring with several bore pits required along the alignment. There will
also be approximately 6 vaults spaced along the conduit run with one at each end of the
alignment.
11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot
number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The project is in the SW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 23 N, Range 4 E, W.M.
A Vicinity Map and a proposed plan exhibit is included at the end of this checklist.
The project area is to the NW of I-405 at the Interurban Ave Exit, approximately from the
Interurban Ave bridge over the Green River to the Southcenter Blvd bridge over the Green
River along the Green River Trail.
12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
Yes
1-1:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 2
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other:
The conduit is to follow the developed, relatively flat path of the Green River Trail. There
are slight to moderate slopes along the path with hilly to steeper areas below the path
toward the Green River.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The existing surface along the conduit alignment has varying slopes from virtually flat to
moderately sloped at around 7.5%. The existing grades of the slopes above and below the
trail also vary but from moderate slopes to areas of steep slopes of less than 2H:1V for
those between the trail and the Green River.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
Silt Loam
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.
None observed
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
A very minor amount of filling will be required at the bore pits which is to be gravel
bedding backfill. Quantities are approximated at around 8-10 cubic yards.
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc
SEPA Checklist
Agency Comments
Page 3
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all stions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
If so, generally describe.
Minor disturbances at the Bore pits is required and like any project involving grading
activities, erosion is always something that can occur. Utilization of BMPs such as filter
fabric fence can be implemented as needed or required to ensure no sediment laden runoff
leaves the project area.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
No additional impervious surface is proposed for the underground conduit project
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
Utilization of BMPs such as filter fabric fence and inlet projection can be implemented as
needed or required to ensure no sediment laden runoff leaves the project area.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example,
dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if
known.
It's anticipated that this utility installation will produce average emissions from the needed
construction equipment consistent with a project of this size. There will be no emissions
generated from the project post -installation.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe.
No
H:U.and Use Applications in PDF \SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 4
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
None
3. Water
a. Surface:
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
The Green River is in some areas approximately 60' off of the proposed conduit
alignment to the East -Southeast. The Green River merges into the Duwamish River
approximately 1.25 miles downstream where it continues to flow to the Northwest and
into the Puget Sound.
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes. The project is located adjacent to and parallel to the Green River, along its
North -Northwest side, within the 200 -ft jurisdictional shoreline area. See the attached
Site Plan Exhibit. No work is proposed over, in or within the OHWM of the river.
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Not applicable
H:U,and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc
Page 5
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known.
No
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the
site plan.
Yes
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
b. Ground:
1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known.
No
H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc
Page 6
SEPA Checklist
Please respo, J all questions. Use separate sheets as nE. .sary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic
tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,
containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general
size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are
expected to serve:
Not applicable
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water
flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
Not applicable
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,
if any:
Disturbed pervious and damaged pavement areas along the project alignment will be
re -vegetated and/or restored accordingly.
H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 7
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
1
Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
1
Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
1
Shrubs
✓
Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
Other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Shrubs and/or grasses along the project path will be disturbed and/or removed, but will be
re -vegetated and/or replaced accordingly. It is anticipated that no trees will be removed or
altered for this project.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Disturbed and/or altered vegetation will be restored to pre -construction condition. No
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation are proposed.
1-1:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
SEPA Checklist
Agency Comments
Page 8
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all c, :ions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site:
Birds:
Hawk, heron, eagle,son birds) other:
Mammals:
Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Fish:
Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
Other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
The Green River is known to be used by chinook salmon, bull trout and bald eagle.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
The entire Puget Sound region is in the Pacific Flyway migration route for waterfowl and
other birds.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Not applicable
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 9
Please respond to all ,tions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
Not applicable
7. Environmental Health
Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of
this proposal? If so, describe.
No
1. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None
2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
SEPA Checklist
Agency Comments
Page 10
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all t ,tions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short-term construction noise will be experienced between the approximate hours of 7
a.m. to 6 p.m. or as dictated by City code. The project will not create any long-term
noise.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The entire project area is within public lands, primarily City right-of-way. Adjacent
properties consist of single-family residential, City and State right-of-ways, the Green
River, a vacant forested parcel and commercial.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Not to our knowledge
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc
Page 11
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all ,tions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The I-405 on and off -ramp overpass as well as the SR 181 (Interurban Ave S) bridge, both
crossing above the Green River Trail perpendicular to the proposed conduit.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Project is within public right-of-way and public lands
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The project area is within public right-of-way and does not have a comprehensive plan
designation.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Urban Conservancy Environment
H:\land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 12
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all 1- .tions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If
so, specify.
The banks of the Green River as well as some other areas uphill of the trail have a Slope
Classification of 3 which has a high landslide potential. There are also some areas of Slope
Classification of 2 which has a moderate landslide potential. These areas as with the entire
area within the 200 -ft shoreline is considered an environmentally sensitive area.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Not Applicable
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Not Applicable
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
None
F1:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 13
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all k. ,tions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing?
Not Applicable
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
Not Applicable
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Not Applicable
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
Not Applicable
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 14
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all c, ions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
Not Applicable
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
Not Applicable
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Not Applicable
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not Applicable
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 15
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
The project is along the Green River Trail
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Any disturbance to the trail or any recreational opportunities off the trail that may be
effected by this project will be restored to pre -construction condition.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None known
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
SEPA Checklist
Agency Comments
Page 16
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all stions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None known
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access
to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The project area can be accessed the same as for the Green River Trail, which would be off
of Southcenter Blvd or Interurban Ave. See plan exhibits attached to this document.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Metro Transit currently serves the projects area. The closest stop is along Interurban Ave
just northwest of the intersection of Interurban Ave and the I-405 on and off -ramps.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
Not Applicable
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 17
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all stions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
None
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No
H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 18
SEPA Checklist
Please respond to all stions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Locations of the bore pits are planned to be outside of the Green River Trail to to keep it
open during construction.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic
system
other:
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
Not Applicable
1-1:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 19
SEPA Checklist
(NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES).
C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not
implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of
noise?
Not Applicable
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Not Applicable
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Not Applicable
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Not Applicable
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF1SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 20
Please respond to all ;tions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Not Applicable
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Not Applicable
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as
parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats,
historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Not Applicable
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Not Applicable
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Not Applicable
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
SEPA Checklist
Agency Comments
Page 21
Please respond to all _ £tions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Not Applicable
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
service and utilities?
Not Applicable
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Not Applicable
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
Not Applicable
D. SIGNATURE
SEPA Checklist
Agency Comments
Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act
Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to
make its decisi
Signature:
Date Submitte.I / — "
H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc
Page 22
-- : -
.-
t .4
,.... ,..r,
. 0
,., : \ Qiitip it,k,,,:tit •., -• ,...__...."
Pe•Z:
_ • . .7 L-_--,
:-=i ....--- : • ' Eseing LemoacreY.1
trytL --
industrial Park i
i-xj `"...., A'
4. --
, Jitig. RI' ,
I: -'4.0 \g . Southcente. Wll e
.1 5 .1 Westfield i I
I I
Baktr Blvd 1 t 1
-'M'il li I
th St
• i
S>t1 2ith St
.. .
if
..4." 1 I
> .
SW lath St
a 1,
tiod Ave SW
E Vattey Rd --.
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
vti
GRAPHIC SCALE
o so loo
1 INCH = 50 FEET (22.x34)
1 INCH -100 FEET (1141r)
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE SITE PLAN
SURVEYOR
CONTOUR ENGINEERING Lk
SURVEYOR: STEVE WOODS PLS
3309 S6TH ST. NV, STE 106
GIG HARBOR, WA 9633S
BASIS OF BEARING
WASHINGTON STATE VHOERT GRID NORTH 63(00001) COORDINATES
AS DETERMINED BV GPS OBSERVATION. NAD 03/ GE01309(CONS).
VERTICAL DATUM
WSOOT • WINOS . FOUND TC N 3' BRASS DISC AT SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF BRIDGE ON 66TH AVE. SOUTH ANO THOS.
ELEVATION S6.6SS (NAVD 66)
CORRCON COM/ERSION TO NGVD 29 IS 55.116 (-3531)
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
I) THE MONUMENT CONTROL SHOWN FOR TNM SITE WAS MSpW1AlED
FT FREIRD TRAVRSE mom. A MU (2) SE039A THFOOOLTIE
WITH INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING META
(RUMBLE S3) AND REAL TIME KINEMATIC (ROOT STATIC GLOBAL
POSITIONING SmE*T(GPSXTRINDLE RR). LINEAR ANO ANULAR
LOSURE OF THE TRAVERSES MEET THE STANDARDS OF WAC
333.30-090.
2) UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOS: SHOWN Fur COST ON THIS SITE
Y THOSE WHICH ARE VISIBLE OR HAVING VISIBLE EVIDENCE
ONLY
THEIR INSTALLATION NIE SHOWN HEREON.
3) THIS REPRESENTS PHYSICAL M
IMPROVEMENT IDm°.AS
H%TOBER E 3013, THE DATE OF THIS FIELD SRWV.
A) THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
0) OFFSET DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PEAPENDICIAAR
TO PROPERTY UNE&
6) ITIS NOT THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY TO SHOW EASEMENTS OR
RESERVATIONS WHICH MAY EFFECT TRS SITE.
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION NOTE
THE IDDR FLOOD ELEVATION WAS DETERMINED BIASED ON THE CURRENT
FEMA FIRM MAR WIN A CONVERSION FACTOR 0 .3.EF APPLIED (PR
S
DRAFT FEMA FLOODOOT) TO OBTAIN THE NAVD Y VERTICAL DATUM.
THE DETERMINED RODE ELEVATIONS Ear AS FOLLOWS:
ATHE INTERURBAN AVE BRIDGE - T
T
salrxcENTER BLVD STOOGE - ES.TA'
7
/ AA9.13.24
mmTaH
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SOLE
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE •
0 4 4 0
7
t
�5S4ftpyg�
SHEET INDEX
SRI SHORELINE SITE PLAN
svSHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
sHOREurrt o9o4 SECTIONS
CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS
BEFORE YOU DIG
(800) 424-5555
DESIGNER: BARR
ENGINEER: 0. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. HAUG
Tn 0-1/38/13 WA
DATE
PROJECT: 124108
13-10A4.9ITE PUN
SHEET
SP1
I OF 3
REV.
A
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
0+00
1 00
STA: 5+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2000
L L-
Iii
}
-'
-
-
- wnici
_am
45
;SSM
_ -H
2ERM
+wFa01FVRmRRm13821371 S...
MIE
20"
r.
_35
7p
Y2321dLLCUAlN�- ... 2 1-.
._ -T-
15_
- w
= MlUT
'--
1 _ --
74
_
- oamro.=
.:.
- 9pR
t
r i
-- --
r—
25
20
-r
2041L1091.192220 al_,
!rtW00xsm2l-
25_
----rtnef148.010 0214
Alt000EC; .
:xG9f1191w'
20
-
= -� --
-•- --
_
IS
_10
r
0
2s_
10
= �_
-
_-"044 mf�twri[R
- -i --
0+00
1 00
STA: 5+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2000
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
--I5 . _-._
4L
40
35
30
121 a -658K12215919
n .rc
rn,CA.w6am,-
Y�
25.
20
15
_19
0+00
—r_
40
�iNfA.9f7�=_
8+1281.312✓ -
35_ -35_
30 �C
25_ _25_
20_ �0
5_ 15
10 19
_55
19
1+00
STA: 6+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
L L-
Iii
-'
-
.F
_am
;SSM
_ -H
2ERM
5Q_
MIE
r.
1-=--i-_-=1---—
L
-� 1=
�
4K '-�_
-1--.���+Es1k4EnlM
_
,*(407:5fes--•7
...
-- --
r—
--
A0—
35
!rtW00xsm2l-
I
.
.-I-jIRi62EN0!RI.WPB
-
_�_
1----
—
-+--
—1EE t
2
. .
I._
1-
0002800+00000 2!r '
r
-7_
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
--I5 . _-._
4L
40
35
30
121 a -658K12215919
n .rc
rn,CA.w6am,-
Y�
25.
20
15
_19
0+00
—r_
40
�iNfA.9f7�=_
8+1281.312✓ -
35_ -35_
30 �C
25_ _25_
20_ �0
5_ 15
10 19
_55
19
1+00
STA: 6+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
55
50_
45
40
J5_
J4—
25_
10_
_IL
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
—
L L-
Iii
-'
-
.F
_am
;SSM
MIE
r.
-
L
-� 1=
�
4K '-�_
-1--.���+Es1k4EnlM
_
_I-
...
----_ -_-___-:=,
-�_
;
_
.
- _
.yglwn>�-s
,
—'1.
—
-+--
—1EE t
2
. .
I._
1-
0002800+00000 2!r '
55
50_
45
40
J5_
J4—
25_
10_
_IL
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
—
L L-
Iii
-'
-
}ZRo.---
_am
;SSM
MIE
��
L
�
853 ,
.-c
_
_I-
...
----_ -_-___-:=,
;
_
.
—'1.
—
-+--
—1EE t
0 CO
—5
2
1+00
STA: 6+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
_12
0+00
0_
J3
3g_
25_
20_
10
2+00
_L 7
Iii
Zt— -�_
-
}ZRo.---
_am
L
�_ { fS®2daiiifst AGa25"
w!L�".-4'.
.-c
_
_I-
...
_-L
rima
_
—'1.
—
-+--
—1EE t
,,
,4--5-----__.
1+00
STA: 4+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
50
40
35_
30_
20-
15
19_
2+00
t"
a
Jz E
m
•
0
OESIGRER 2.BARR
MOWER 8.811.
014188 DMA
823 12314 RN NM
0818 000803
8281820.
PRNE01: 3-108
DWG 20221 12.00.S00 11188
SP2
2063
A
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
STA: 9+75
Horizontal Scale 1=30'
Vertical Scale 1=10'
STA: 10+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1=10'
_210_
------ -
:- _c7.2310RAV0SI3
- -
—
35
30
.
,
Ts-33.1NAVITISt-- _
15___
-. —r=
-=1111911111191,_--
2
1
........
25_
-..1-1.1.3(-2
_TORDIRS009--
—i ----o__
— ----1---
0,.....„,._
-
--
25
10
Iteca.TuRtiali-
-- ._
r-
_01100iNTSCHIGSwfirax
_
,-- V -r]
--,2,-.,=_,.-rlir_=--. • rimanaH=
20
..
15
10
_
STA: 9+75
Horizontal Scale 1=30'
Vertical Scale 1=10'
STA: 10+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1=10'
_210_
------ -
:- _c7.2310RAV0SI3
- -
90
. - '
-1
'Lama
15___
-. —r=
==1-_-7140SP91119=- _
----:
_t.
30
------
-..1-1.1.3(-2
_25
— ----1---
0,.....„,._
7
C----
25
r-
1—
,-- V -r]
--,2,-.,=_,.-rlir_=--. • rimanaH=
20
..
15
10
_
,.• =
-
-----J.
10
_ .
STA: 7+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 9+00
9+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
CUENT: SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
ONE: (253) 2994598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J SARR
ENGINEER B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
313 TT3N ITTNEWNI
DATE: 01/03/13
PROJECT: IT -108
DWG NAME: 12-108-0910 PLAN
SHEET
SP3
3003
REV.
A
------ -
:- _c7.2310RAV0SI3
- -
' _ftg .6•S.'",
. - '
-1
'Lama
=-.-
TIFISLORE-,--
__
----:
t+2wconourr-i;:
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 9+00
9+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
CUENT: SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
ONE: (253) 2994598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J SARR
ENGINEER B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
313 TT3N ITTNEWNI
DATE: 01/03/13
PROJECT: IT -108
DWG NAME: 12-108-0910 PLAN
SHEET
SP3
3003
REV.
A
:- _c7.2310RAV0SI3
1-
-1
TIFISLORE-,--
__
----:
t+2wconourr-i;:
_ 040,20weLlemuoLval—
--,==
— ----1---
- "
r-
1—
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 9+00
9+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
CUENT: SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
ONE: (253) 2994598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J SARR
ENGINEER B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
313 TT3N ITTNEWNI
DATE: 01/03/13
PROJECT: IT -108
DWG NAME: 12-108-0910 PLAN
SHEET
SP3
3003
REV.
A
of Tukwilale
TCo: CiCltyientfi
t'-';i101i,uk---4-ii
ENGINEERING • L L C
TRANSMITTAL
Contour Engineering PLLC
3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Gig Harbor WA 98335
PH: (253)857-5454 FAX (253)857-5458
From: Jeremy Haug, P.E.
Date: January 9th, 2013
Regarding: SEPA Checklist for Southcenter Blvd
& Green River Trail Conduit Ext
Project Number: 12-108
Accompanying this transmittal are the following documents:
Date
# Copies
Description
1/9/13
5
SEPA Checklist (one is ORIGINAL signatures)
1/9/13
1
Complete Application Checklist
1/9/12
1
Copies of Shoreline Site Plan and Cross Sections, and Civil
Plans 11"x17"
1/9)2
1
Copy of Shoreline Substantial Development Application
Application Fee Check
RFC VED
CITY OF TUKWILA 15 2013
Department of Community Development drum SEPA
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 `�IRONMENTAL
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 REVIEW
E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov
APPLICATION
FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA
Planner:
File Number: b ir- -- CO
Application Complete Date:
Project File Number: T 1 , ')
On
Application Incomplete Date:
Other File Numbers: ( .,‘'..7- — dC\
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Southcenter Blvd and Green River Trail Conduit Extension
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and
subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection.
Along Green River Trail, from Southcenter Blvd to Fort Dent Way
LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement).
All work is within City public lands - right-of-way and parcel 295490-0421
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards,
and
• is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: Jeremy Haug, P.E. - Contour Engineering LLC
Address: 3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Phone: (253) 857-5454 FAX: (253) 509-0044
E-mail: 'eremy@contourpllc.com
Signature:
HALand Use Applications In PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc
Date: /'9—Z. I3
S 'Mild St
rte, -
��. 1t•
. ' So,attcente- IJ7a11
1 Westfield
'. Su;.t�cent.c
;i4. Mali
0
0.01--
<
t'4,11,15,t'4,11,15,cad%' i SYU16thSt
)4n SNS
S71E sW i9tn st
Baker Blvd
Bring tnnaacres1
industrial Park i
!1
•
1
1 1
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100
1 INCH = 50 FEET (22'x34")
1 INCH = 100 FEET (11"x17")
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE SITE PLAN
SURVEYOR
CONTOUR ENGINEERING LLC
SURVEYOR: STEVE WOODS PLS
3309 56TH 5T. NW, 5TE 106
GIG HARBOR, WA 98335
BASIS OF BEARING
WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID NORTH ZONE(4601) COORDINATES
AS DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATION. NAD 83/ GEOI009(CONUS).
VERTICAL DATUM
BASE:
WSOOT !t GP17405162: FOUND "X" IN 3" BRASS DISC AT SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF BRIDGE ON 66TH AVE SOUTH AND 1405.
ELEVATION 58.655 (NAVD 88)
CORPSCON CONVERSION TO NGVD 29 IS 55.118 (-3.537)
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1) THE MONUMENT CONTROL SHOWN FOR THIS SITE WAS ACCOMPLISHED
BY FIELD TRAVERSE UTILIZING A TWO (2) SECOND THEODOLITE
WITH INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING METER
(TRIMBLE 5-3) AND REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) / STATIC GLOBAL
POSmONING SYSTEM (GPS)(TRIMBLE R8). LINEAR AND ANGULAR
CLOSURE OF THE TRAVERSES MEET THE STANDARDS OF WAC
332-130-090.
2) UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE.
ONLY THOSE WHICH ARE VISIBLE OR HAVING VISIBLE EVIDENCE
OF THEIR INSTALLATION ARE SHOWN HEREON.
3) THIS SURVEY REPRESENTS PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT CONDmONS AS
THEY EXISTED OCTOBER 8, 2012, THE DATE OF THIS FIELD SURVEY.
4) THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
5) OFFSET DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR
TO PROPERTY LINES.
6) IT IS NOT THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY TO SHOW EASEMENTS OR
RESERVATIONS WHICH MAY EFFECT THIS SITE.
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION NOTE
THE 100 -YR FLOOD ELEVATION WAS DETERMINED BASED ON THE CURRENT
FEMA FIRM MAPS WITH A CONVERSION FACTOR OF +3.53' APPLIED (PER
DRAFT FEMA FLOOD STUDY) TO OBTAIN THE NAVD 88 VERTICAL DATUM.
THE DETERMINED FLOOD ELEVATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
AT THE INTERURBAN AVE BRIDGE = 25.33'
AT THE SOUTHCENTER BLVD BRIDGE = 25.74'
200'SHORELINE _
JURIS ICTION
•
0/,
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE - •
200'
SHORELINE
1URISTICNON
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
44.
00
a
0
z
0
1-
0.
N00
U
W
0
z
N
0:
°i ci, , 1
-4 !/4 at
100' / {
SA NE ,� ,../�e ,' GREEN RNER TRAIL
.:„....•1.
..._
1 _ : _ E _
e.
11
A
�P 1
L
TR
OMR 4.
UHN�
0 Q
• .,ct.`-0
.4.40.0010111.4.
y4
•
•
SOWN ARE
R , H.a`ai' a::..v,Lfir7[L� , 2 ;00
eL(D E iiihiftIMIN Patting/
.q4 t� 4
4V, 41 R
.,y'.\ "4 s1-'
/
/SOLRHCENTER BLVD
(FUN CENTER. WAN)
`-- BRIDGE
SHEET INDEX
SPI SHORELINE SITE PLAN
SP2 SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
SP3 SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
RECEIVED
JAN 15 2013
COMMUNITY
nFVF1 OPMENT
CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS
BEFORE YOU DIG
(800) 424-5555
SHORELINE SITE PLAN
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
1-
z
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. HAUG
S23 T23NRO4EWM
DATE: 01/08/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12 -108 -SITE PLAN
SHEET
REV.
SP1
1 OF 3
0
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
50 50
45
#
F
UGHT STANDARD
45
f �
45
I
N - :
-
'ASPHALT GREENY
-.
45
40
ASIIIALT GREEN
A88.40,-T-GRFN
-•-- - '
45
RIVEN L
aSPHAI T KEEN—
�°
40
35
ER TRAIL
_
�-
_
F
ASPHALT
VFR T. li
k
Q
YRFlOOD EL
----CONCRETE
PICNIC
-AREA
40
35
=VISUAL INSPECf10N
- BORE=
-VER
DUITUE
CLEARANCE
HOLE=ATFROSSING
pi:MAINTAIN 1 S.MIN:
_ 11®
- 1�nn
- `,i
pI57iNGf'
—ORDINARY
-x
SLOPE=
P(WFR4
TOP OF
35
=CONTRACTORISSD-VERIFYI
"y
NEWS N U
DURINGCONSTRUCi1ON"-_ . _
y�
•,nn'
EW -C NDUIT�
P�I
IN
7-
T
�
,
30
1
�
_
LXISTINC W-ATCRANB
-
s
' ORDINAWHI?iWATERLLINE
30
-
NEWCON401T__I
I
-- - ----
30
25
NSN-O�
a CONDUIT
EXISTING
25
TING WATERANDGAS
30
20
POWER
_
NES PEN lJTlf]7a/ I CACP,7E _
k
25
1Q>
t
IOPYR FLOOD b.
EXIS-F3NG
WATERAND-
PER-UTlt�frY=LOCAT
p
15
f
L�NES
1 �
ONES
-100
-.R FLOOD
L.
10
20
15
EL 1.
RDINARY HIEH_WATERIINE.
I
- -
}
�: Ir
EL_
+ -i—
I
20
1 -YR FLOOD
--
ORDINARY-HIGFLWATER+ LINE
20
5
25.74(NAVD
88)-4--
1
20
15
10
WA
-
--
- --
ORDINARY11IG
10
0+00
60
1+00
STA: 5+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
50
45
40
VISUAL.. 1NSPECTION:HOLE-AT_C TOSSING
EIRE-CONDURUER13MIAINTAINIS' MU
VERTICAL CLEARAN
35
30
EXISTING�
-POWER.
25
NEW CO D.UIT
20
-EXIST.[111G-WATER-P.ND-GAS
LINES PER UTILITY -LOCATE
10,
0+00
#
F
UGHT STANDARD
45
r
50
45
-
Tpo Oc,cLOuE-
1
ASIIIALT GREEN
A88.40,-T-GRFN
-•-- - '
45
aSPHAI T KEEN—
�°
40
35
ER TRAIL
_
�-
_
-3
ASPHALT
VFR T. li
k
--
YRFlOOD EL
3C
RIVER TRAIL
1
40
35m
---
ICC; WATER
pI57iNGf'
—ORDINARY
-x
1
P(WFR4
30
25
=CONTRACTORISSD-VERIFYI
NEWS N U
DURINGCONSTRUCi1ON"-_ . _
y�
•,nn'
EW -C NDUIT�
IN
7-
T
�
,
30
1
�
a STING
LXISTINC W-ATCRANB
-
s
' ORDINAWHI?iWATERLLINE
POWER -1
-
- F
-cu
I LINES
1
PER O Y LOCATE
NSN-O�
a CONDUIT
25
TING WATERANDGAS
30
20
_
NES PEN lJTlf]7a/ I CACP,7E _
k
1Q>
t
IOPYR FLOOD b.
20
15
2-5.74- NAVD 8
p
15
f
L�NES
1 �
=
25
--
10
EL 1.
RDINARY HIEH_WATERIINE.
I
- -
_- -
1 YR FLOOD
25.74 ,L4VD-881
EL_
+ -i—
I
l- -
1 -YR FLOOD
--
ORDINARY-HIGFLWATER+ LINE
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
50
45
40
VISUAL.. 1NSPECTION:HOLE-AT_C TOSSING
EIRE-CONDURUER13MIAINTAINIS' MU
VERTICAL CLEARAN
35
30
EXISTING�
-POWER.
25
NEW CO D.UIT
20
-EXIST.[111G-WATER-P.ND-GAS
LINES PER UTILITY -LOCATE
10,
0+00
1+00
STA: 6+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
50 50
45 45
40 40
35 35
30
25
20
15
10
2+00
55
50
#
F
UGHT STANDARD
45
r
50
45
-
Tpo Oc,cLOuE-
1
ASIIIALT GREEN
A88.40,-T-GRFN
-•-- - '
45
aSPHAI T KEEN—
�°
40
35
ER TRAIL
_
�-
_
-3
40
35
k
--
YRFlOOD EL
3C
RIVER TRAIL
1
40
35m
---
ICC; WATER
pI57iNGf'
—ORDINARY
-x
1+00
STA: 6+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
50 50
45 45
40 40
35 35
30
25
20
15
10
2+00
55
50
#
F
45
r
50
45
i1
1
ASIIIALT GREEN
A88.40,-T-GRFN
-•-- - '
45
_RIMTRATt,
40
35
RIVE_RTRAIL
-
_
-3
40
35
k
--
- —__ - APT_=OF._SLOPE�-.-:.-
3C
�--1
n
RIVER TRAIL
FXISTlNG �//Ez a
1 POWER //
40
35m
---
EL-
pI57iNGf'
_
-x
1
P(WFR4
30
25
=CONTRACTORISSD-VERIFYI
NEWS N U
DURINGCONSTRUCi1ON"-_ . _
y�
•,nn'
EW -C NDUIT�
ER
�
,
30
1
�
30
LXISTINC W-ATCRANB
-
s
' ORDINAWHI?iWATERLLINE
GAS
-
t
-cu
I LINES
1
PER O Y LOCATE
NSN-O�
25
30
20
25
1Q>
IOPYR FLOOD b.
20
15
2-5.74- NAVD 8
p
15
f
L�NES
1 �
=
25
10
EL 1.
RDINARY HIEH_WATERIINE.
I
10
I
l- -
1 -YR FLOOD
--
-- -
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
30
25
20
15
10
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 6+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
50
45
#
F
45
r
i1
1
A88.40,-T-GRFN
-•-- - '
-
RIVE_RTRAIL
-
_
-3
ASPHALT GREEN
k
IUP.ULSLUPE.-
3C
RIVER TRAIL
FXISTlNG �//Ez a
1 POWER //
40
35m
- 100YR.FLOOD
EL-
EXISfiNGWATERAND•GASI1NES-
-x
IN-T.11IS.ARU1 WERC.NOT LOCATED
=CONTRACTORISSD-VERIFYI
DURINGCONSTRUCi1ON"-_ . _
y�
•,nn'
EW -C NDUIT�
ER
�
,
1
�
30
{
' ORDINAWHI?iWATERLLINE
-
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 6+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
50
45
45
1
-
_
ASPHALT GREEN
40
RIVER TRAIL
40
35m
��
TOP Of SLOPE.__ _
NW
ER
,
,
35
30
-
POWER -
-
t
NSN-O�
30
25
STING WATER AND
PER --1 fILITY-LOBATE
GAS
f
f
L�NES
25
i
EL 1.
I
_ -
1 -YR FLOOD
20
5
25.74(NAVD
88)-4--
1
20
-
15
HIGHWATER
LINE
ORDINARY
0+00
1+00
STA: 4+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
RECEIVED
JAN 1'5 2013
COMMUN9TY
DEVELOPMENT
}
DESCRIPTION
z
0
N
N
l
Uz
ILI zO
J
UJ LLJ
V)
0
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
1-
z
w
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NRO4E WM
DATE: 01/08/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12 -108 -SITE PLAN
SHEET
REV.
SP2
2 OF 3
A
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
40 40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
40
35 35
30 30
25 25
20
15
10
5
0+00
1+00
STA: 9+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
45 45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
1= --
L
ASPNALT
GREEN
RIVER
YR
t-25-33t(NAVD-88)—
FLOOD -EL
1ObYR-FLOOD EL
30
WIHG�WALLO
LBR1flC[ AD1
100 -YR FLOOD.E'1
100 YRF{OOD�-
7
_
I40SBRIDGE
ON-RAMP._
25.33 kNA -s
GREEN
-
—�
BRIDGE X
—RIVER -TRAIL
—BORE
—\�,-
_ASPHAtTGRffN
1-405
ITT
-ASPHALLGREEN
-RIVER-TRAIL
s Mme\
DIVER
MIN
Ir-
ASPHALT
RIVER
-GREEN
,.„.44_-
__t TOP OF OPE
OFSL.PE
1f1
36
= Hm_
,
NEWLONDUH-=..-
-'?11 :
TOP_:OF
r tNEW-COND1fIC
—
'G
i
-MIN'
R
1
1
_
ORDINARY IGt
WATER UNE
- I
--
�
10
5
—SIS AN
=
----
---(--
I
ORDINARY HIGH
40
35 35
30 30
25 25
20
15
10
5
0+00
1+00
STA: 9+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
45 45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
40
35
30
25
20
15
20
15
10
5
1= --
L
ASPNALT
GREEN
RIVER
YR
t-25-33t(NAVD-88)—
FLOOD -EL
1ObYR-FLOOD EL
30
WIHG�WALLO
LBR1flC[ AD1
100 YRF{OOD�-
7
_
I40SBRIDGE
ON-RAMP._
�ZIRE PIT-—�
GREEN
-
—�
BRIDGE X
—RIVER -TRAIL
—BORE
—\�,-
_f
- .`•�.-1-�—.
1-405
ITT
-ASPHALLGREEN
-RIVER-TRAIL
s Mme\
,./
MIN
Ir-
ASPHALT
RIVER
-GREEN
OFSL.PE
1f1
TRAIL
NEWLONDUH-=..-
-'?11 :
TOP_:OF
SLOPE-
i
-MIN'
R
1
1
_
---1
NG POWEIlLSERV10E<F9Ra3GHT
IN-N-LLS/AREA ISNOT
CONNRACTOR=1STO 68RIFY
I
41
--
10
5
—SIS AN
=
----
---(--
--
ORDINARY HIGH
r
VEW CONDUIT--
r1
r
a_
- .--ATfOLINE
10
III
1 YR FLOOD -EL
-
Ilt
ORDINARY
HIGH.—
—WATER
LINE
1III
p---
L
J
40
35
30
25
20
15
20
15
10
5
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0+00
35
1+00
STA: 10+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=301
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
30
25
20
15
10 10
5 5
0+00
1+00
STA: 7+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=101
2+00
2+00
- i--- ---- 35
a I5TING-BLOCK W
YR
t-25-33t(NAVD-88)—
FLOOD -EL
1ObYR-FLOOD EL
30
t--
100 YRF{OOD�-
2AVO 86)
�ZIRE PIT-—�
GREEN
—IASPHAL-
—RIVER -TRAIL
—BORE
—\�,-
25
25
15
-ASPHALLGREEN
-RIVER-TRAIL
s Mme\
-
MIN
Ir-
OFSL.PE
,TOP
NEWLONDUH-=..-
-'?11 :
NEW CON
UIT —r
i
I tW-GONDU
R
1
_
---1
NG POWEIlLSERV10E<F9Ra3GHT
IN-N-LLS/AREA ISNOT
CONNRACTOR=1STO 68RIFY
I
--
10
5
—SIS AN
ORDINAL'( -HIGH WATER
a
---(--
--
ORDINARY HIGH
r
r
a_
- .--ATfOLINE
10
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0+00
35
1+00
STA: 10+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=301
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
30
25
20
15
10 10
5 5
0+00
1+00
STA: 7+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=101
2+00
2+00
- i--- ---- 35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=101.
2+00
35
30
a I5TING-BLOCK W
YR
t-25-33t(NAVD-88)—
FLOOD -EL
30
t--
100 YRF{OOD�-
F -ASPHALT
GREEN
—IASPHAL-
—RIVER -TRAIL
E
—\�,-
25
25
15
s Mme\
-
MIN
Ir-
NEWLONDUH-=..-
-'?11 :
f
I tW-GONDU
R
_
---1
NG POWEIlLSERV10E<F9Ra3GHT
IN-N-LLS/AREA ISNOT
CONNRACTOR=1STO 68RIFY
I
15
10
5
—SIS AN
---(--
--
ORDINARY HIGH
L
a_
- .--ATfOLINE
10
—DRDINN
RYrHIGEEWATER
Li
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=101.
2+00
35
30
a I5TING-BLOCK W
YR
t-25-33t(NAVD-88)—
FLOOD -EL
30
t--
+
F -ASPHALT
GREEN
—RIVER -TRAIL
25
25
15
s Mme\
•P OF SLOPE
I tW-GONDU
R
_
---1
NG POWEIlLSERV10E<F9Ra3GHT
IN-N-LLS/AREA ISNOT
CONNRACTOR=1STO 68RIFY
15
10
5
—SIS AN
---(--
__LOCATED,
—DURING-CONSIRUCTION--Y
_ -
a_
10
—DRDINN
RYrHIGEEWATER
Li
0+00
1+00
STA: 9+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
RECEIVED
1JAN 15 2013
COMMt tN
Tr
DEVELOPMENT
>03
0
DESCRIPTION
z
0
c0
JZ E
Z 8
JZ
d 8:o
C�p3g
ZZ
g a 5
cc re ig
_ Z = z
W �
N
IJJL"`"
iS�'
Z z0 cc
WEA
W M
Z
5i
W 5
J
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
z
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23N RO4E WM
DATE: 01/08/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12.108 -SITE PLAN
SHEET
REV.
A
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100
1 INCH = 50 FEET (22"x341
1 INCH = 100 FEET (11"x17")
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE SITE PLAN
SURVEYOR
CONTOUR ENGINEERING LLC
SURVEYOR: STEVE WOODS RS
3309 56Th 5i, NW, STE 106
GIG HARBOR, WA 98335
BASIS OF BEARING
WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID NORTH ZONE(4601) COORDINATES
AS DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATION. NAD 83/ GEOID09(CONUS).
VERTICAL DATUM
BASE:
WSDOT 8 GP17405.62: FOUND "X" IN 3" BRASS DISC AT SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF BRIDGE ON 66T11 AVE SOUTH AND 1405.
ELEVATION 58.655 (NAVD 88)
CORPSCON CONVERSION TO NGVD 29 15 55.118 (-3.537)
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1) THE MONUMENT CONTROL SHOWN FOR THIS SITE WAS ACCOMPLISHED
BY FIELD TRAVERSE UTILIZING A TWO (2) SECOND THEODOLITE
WITH INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING METER
(TRIMBLE 5-3) AND REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) / STATIC GLOBAL
POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)(TRIMBLE R8). LINEAR AND ANGULAR
CLOSURE OF THE TRAVERSES MEET THE STANDARDS OF WAC
332-130-090.
2) UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE.
ONLY THOSE WHICH ARE VISIBLE OR HAVING VISIBLE EVIDENCE
OF THEIR INSTALLATION ARE SHOWN HEREON.
3) THIS SURVEY REPRESENTS PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT CONDITIONS AS
THEY EXISTED OCTOBER 8, 2012, THE DATE OF THIS FIELD SURVEY.
4) THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
5) OFFSET DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR
TO PROPERTY LINES.
6) IT IS NOT THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY TO SHOW EASEMENTS OR
RESERVATIONS WHICH MAY EFFECT THIS SITE.
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION NOTE
THE 100 -YR FLOOD ELEVATION WAS DETERMINED BASED ON THE CURRENT
FEMA FIRM MAPS WITH A CONVERSION FACTOR OF +3.53' APPLIED (PER
DRAFT FEMA ROOD STUDY) TO OBTAIN THE NAVD 88 VERTICAL DATUM.
THE DETERMINED FLOOD ELEVATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
AT THE INTERURBAN AVE BRIDGE a 25.33'
AT THE SOUTHCENTER BLVD BRIDGE = 25.74'
205 SHORELINE
JURISTICDON
�rlER1P^II' .•/ " i
;Ow
AV . t ' i Pam -
i' �•
/ i:.4, •N+%
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
/
205
SHORELINE
IURISTICNON
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
04 w.yt''•
21'
100'1, SHORELINE
. ti, STIFFER di a:.:., 1'10+00 . ,lilyiiii"'
%o,
o
e6 ,
S2N 0HNR
....--.7--
' 3
...--.-m3 ./
v•
•
GREENANER TRAIL
OC, 0O,
d `S
v 4. 4. 14181Qw,.T
a A+�Iw''.:. 1+00
�rER`., a ; Nq�1 \iaAyLi 174I1t�d 2 .00
4 ���a�Of ���tliwlJi�
i4 4 yam.
/
oi%
/(FUN EBRIDGE WAY)
SHEET INDEX
SPI SHORELINE SITE PLAN
SP2 SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
SP3 SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
RECEIVED
PAN 1t5 2013
CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS
BEFORE YOU DIG
(800) 424-5555
COAAMUNITfi
DEVELOPMENT
0
z
W
5J
1--1
0
SHORELINE SITE PLAN
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
w
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. HAUG
S23 T23NRO4E WM
DATE: 01/08/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12.108 -SITE PLAN
SHEET
REV.
SP1
1 OF 3
A
uj
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
50 50 50 50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 5+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
60 60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
r
-
- -
.ASPHALT -GREEN
-RIVER
-
-
-
- T
TRAIL
MAINTAINYS'MIN.-t
-
--
4 —
CONCRETE.PICNICAREAI
-VISUALINSPECTION=HOLEAT.CROSSING-
= -
�......
-
BORE CONDUITDERTH:MAINTAIN-J810l1N:-.7_
ERTtcJA-CLEARANCE
_ _.-L
"""
-
_TOPOFSIOPE=.
. -
-
1
''.
RIVER TRAIL
L
t
JUP Uh_Sf.UYG
4„
EXISTING
T -
NR4 0NQU1T
~
a'.'�1
-t
-
POWER R
EXISTING
GAS 1iNE5- -
_
1-
-POWER
DIRT Durr
— --
TOP OF
SLOPE 1
EXISTING
WATER=AND
PER UTILrry
GAS
36 -�`
+
'4
UNES
LOCATE
.
..'YR-F100D.0L
-
_
- —
t
—SJ4',(NAND-881-....
+
- _
TT
I
1
.
i
. _
EXISTING
r
r
EXISTING
-LINES PERIM-11YLOCATE
-WATER AND GAS
400
YR FLOOD
-POWER_-�
=
2j
LINE
ORDINARY:HIGH
EXISTING WATER AND
WATER33NE\-
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 5+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
60 60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
55
50
45
40
35
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
r
-
- -
- .
Z4
15UAL_INSPECr10NHOLEATSROSSING
SORECONDUITDEPTH:
- T
STANDARD
MAINTAINYS'MIN.-t
-
--
4 —
��E
-- -ns,44vi1.*rPEEa
- -
ASPHALT
RIVER -TRAIL
ASPHALT GREEN
. -
t
''.
RIVER TRAIL
L
t
JUP Uh_Sf.UYG
4„
EXISTING
T -
ASPHALT GREEN
RIVER -TRAIL
- 1—
-t
-
POWER R
r
GAS 1iNE5- -
_
1-
_ IN TI IIS ARCA WORE NOT LOCATED
DIRT Durr
— --
TOP OF
SLOPE 1
r
,:k
36 -�`
+
'4
MIN
t
j
.n
_
i
ll
I
1
.
POWER
. _
EXISTING
r
r
EXISTING
-LINES PERIM-11YLOCATE
-WATER AND GAS
400
YR FLOOD
-POWER_-�
=
2j
LINE
r
EXISTING WATER AND
CAS
NEW CONDUIT
LINES PER LIT1LIraCCATE
4
EXISTING:WATER.
AND GAS. -
NES PER
UTILITY LQCATE
}
I
I
1 YR..FLOOD
EL -
I
-
NAVD-8814------J-
--.-_-._
------ ___
f ,
-
ORDINARY
HIGH
WATER
NE
A___
-EL _—
—
ORDLNARYIiIGH
WATER
100 YR FLOOD
25.74-(1' VO 881. 4--
.
RDINARY /41044 -WATER LINE
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
55
50
45
40
35
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
0+00
55
1+00
STA: 6+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
30 _10
25
20
15
2+00
r
-
- -
- .
--_- —-
15UAL_INSPECr10NHOLEATSROSSING
SORECONDUITDEPTH:
- T
STANDARD
MAINTAINYS'MIN.-t
-
--
4 —
��E
-- -ns,44vi1.*rPEEa
- -
=w;T1CAtCLEARANCE--•
RIVER -TRAIL
ASPHALT GREEN
. -
t
''.
RIVER TRAIL
L
t
JUP Uh_Sf.UYG
4„
EXISTING
T -
ASPHALT GREEN
RIVER -TRAIL
- 1—
-t
-
POWER R
r
GAS 1iNE5- -
_
1-
_ IN TI IIS ARCA WORE NOT LOCATED
DIRT Durr
— --
TOP OF
SLOPE 1
r
,:k
36 -�`
+
'4
' - -..-NEW CONDUIT'S
t
j
.n
_
i
ll
I
1
.
POWER
. _
NEW CONDUIT
r
EXISTING
-LINES PERIM-11YLOCATE
-WATER AND GAS
400
YR FLOOD
EL -
=
WATER
LINE
r
EXISTING WATER AND
CAS
LINES PER LIT1LIraCCATE
L
}
I
I
1 YR..FLOOD
EL -
I
-
NAVD-8814------J-
--.-_-._
------ ___
f ,
-
ORDINARY
HIGH
WATER
NE
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
0+00
55
1+00
STA: 6+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
30 _10
25
20
15
2+00
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
45
40
_35-
30
25
20_
15
-
- T
ASPHALT
GREEN
--
-- -ns,44vi1.*rPEEa
T
RIVER -TRAIL
ASPHALT GREEN
. -
t
''.
RIVER TRAIL
L
t
JUP Uh_Sf.UYG
4„
A
—
EXISTING
1 POWER
1.POWER
4 i001RRI00D-EL
r
GAS 1iNE5- -
—NEW GOND
1-
_ IN TI IIS ARCA WORE NOT LOCATED
- -
— --
TOP OF
SLOPE 1
r
,:k
36 -�`
+
'4
' - -..-NEW CONDUIT'S
t
j
.n
_
i
ll
I
1
.
POWER
. _
NEW CONDUIT
r
1 0 Y FLOOD EL
t
R7INARYNj0H
i
WATER
LINE
r
EXISTING WATER AND
CAS
LINES PER LIT1LIraCCATE
L
1
I
1 YR..FLOOD
EL -
I
1
25.74
NAVD-8814------J-
--.-_-._
------ ___
f ,
t i
ORDLNARYIiIGH
WATER
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
45
40
_35-
30
25
20_
15
-
- T
ASPHALT
GREEN
--
-- -ns,44vi1.*rPEEa
T
RIVER -TRAIL
. -
- RIVER ..
''.
T0P OrSLO
t
JUP Uh_Sf.UYG
IN
="...-
—
EXISTING
1 POWER
1.POWER
4 i001RRI00D-EL
= EXISTING
GAS 1iNE5- -
—NEW GOND
1-
_ IN TI IIS ARCA WORE NOT LOCATED
t
L
-
= DURING CONSTR7OVENIFYi�
r
,:k
DURING CONSTRUCTION
+
'4
' - -..-NEW CONDUIT'S
GAS-
ATE
.n
UTILITYPER
I
1
.
{
1 0 Y FLOOD EL
t
R7INARYNj0H
--- -- -
WATER
LINE
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 6+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
50 50
45,
40
35
30
25
_20
15,
10 10
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
0+00
1+00
STA: 4+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
45 45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
2+00
RECEIVED
JAN 15 2013
is
--00/ DEV�P 7
0
Z
0
IY
z
Z O
W w
Ce0
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
z
J
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NRO4E WM
DATE: 01/08/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12.108 -SITE PLAN
SHEET
REV.
SP2
2 OF 3
A
- T
ASPHALT
GREEN
--
_
''
RIVER -TRAIL
36
T0P OrSLO
MIN
—EXTSTTNC_�
_4.8
1.POWER
—NEW GOND
1-
t
r
,:k
EXISTING
LINES
WATER -AND
-T-LO
GAS-
ATE
UTILITYPER
.
1 0 Y FLOOD EL
t
--- -- -
25.74' (NAVD 881
-
L
RDINARY NIGH_WATTR
LINE
---
0+00
1+00
STA: 4+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
45 45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
2+00
RECEIVED
JAN 15 2013
is
--00/ DEV�P 7
0
Z
0
IY
z
Z O
W w
Ce0
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
z
J
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NRO4E WM
DATE: 01/08/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12.108 -SITE PLAN
SHEET
REV.
SP2
2 OF 3
A
40
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS
40
35
-3
25
20
15
CONDUIT
5
ORDI(4ARY H
40. 40
35 35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0+00
1+00
STA: 9+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
45 45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
l 1
1 .;
RIV
T GREEN
TRAIL
-EL
-" _ -- -
100 Yli FLOOD
-- _�
3- 25.33 LNAVD•88) -- -
1
1
-
ASPHALT -GREEN
TRAIL
___
1
_
TOP OF$LOPE=t
j
- -
--
I-4058RIDGE-ONRAMP
' -
t_
-. _
30
ASPHALT"GREEN
_WATERLINE-- _T-
I-405 BRIDGE (--
—i -
}
40. 40
35 35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0+00
1+00
STA: 9+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
45 45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0+00
1+00
STA: 7+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
30
25
20
15
10
5
l 1
1 .;
RIV
T GREEN
TRAIL
H
-" _ -- -
-"---
-- _�
EOISTINGBLOO(.WALL.
WING
WALL OF BRIDGE ABUTMENT -- --
30_
100YR FLOOD
25.33' (NAVD-88)
FI
30'
25
j
- -
--
I-4058RIDGE-ONRAMP
' -
t_
-. _
30
ASPHALT"GREEN
I-405 BRIDGE (--
_-
TRKL
}
r
ASPHALTGREEN
- -
-11 TOO FcLo
_BRE
-
—20
-
15
20
15
_
MIL IL.
L
y_.
4........-1—.13
_
5'51N
— TOP-OF5[O_PE
_ 1-ASPHALLGREEN
TOP OFiSLOPE
% I
---_.-_-----
—I-----
-
__-
.
a4
1I
TRAIL
-
--
1 #
36..
TOP OF -S1
PE
-11 i
t
EXISTING POWER
EW CONgUIZ
it
--
j- -i
—
— •r Iti
ORDINARY
100 -YR FLOOD -EL
I'I ORDINARY -HIGH.—
10
_ _
:NEW -CONDUIT
F
14 - - WATER -UNE
{t -F
-
---.
... ---.
--
. _ .. T - ___
WATER. UNE
—
t^ ORDINARY HIGH:
RDINARYHIGH-WATERLINE,
5
_
--
_
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0+00
1+00
STA: 7+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
30
25
20
15
10
5
35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 10+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
35
-
1
H
-
EOISTINGBLOO(.WALL.
- 100 YR•FIDOII EL
30_
100YR FLOOD
25.33' (NAVD-88)
FI
30'
25
300 YR ELOOOELL,
- -
25
- --
ASPHALT GREEN --ii
30
ASPHALT"GREEN
.—
PIT
_-
TRKL
}
I
C'
- -
-11 TOO FcLo
_BRE
-
—20
-
15
20
15
—race =
4........-1—.13
_
5'51N
— TOP-OF5[O_PE
_ 1-ASPHALLGREEN
-
% I
---_.-_-----
—I-----
-
__-
.
-RNI:R
-_i
TRAIL
-
--
1 #
36..
TOP OF -S1
PE
1
t
EXISTING POWER
L
MiN
\
f
15
5
ORDINARY
HIGHWATERUNE
-t J
-1-
10
LOCATED, CON1RACTOR ISTD VERIFY --
:NEW -CONDUIT
S
10
{t -F
-
---.
... ---.
--
. _ .. T - ___
WATER. UNE
—
t^ ORDINARY HIGH:
RDINARYHIGH-WATERLINE,
5
_
--
_
yy
35
30
25
20
15
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 10+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
35
-
BRIDGE- -
EOISTINGBLOO(.WALL.
- 100 YR•FIDOII EL
30_
T—
1-4o5
30'
25
300 YR ELOOOELL,
- -
25
- --
ASPHALT GREEN --ii
30
ASPHALT"GREEN
_-
TRKL
}
I
C'
- -
-11 TOO FcLo
25
—20
-
15
20
15
—race =
4........-1—.13
_
5'51N
— TOP-OF5[O_PE
-
% I
—I-----
- -
VIEW CONDUIT
.
`"c-1
zo
15
-
--
1 #
NEWCON UCf-
1 _ _.--1_
1
t
EXISTING POWER
L
a
Tx-
15
5
ORDINARY
HIGHWATERUNE
-t J
-1-
10
LOCATED, CON1RACTOR ISTD VERIFY --
=1-
10
{t -F
-
---.
... ---.
--
. _ .. T - ___
0+00
1+00
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
35
30
EOISTINGBLOO(.WALL.
- 100 YR•FIDOII EL
30_
- 2533 (NAVD88)-
- -
25
�-
ASPHALT"GREEN
TRAIL _
_•
I
25
- -
T—�RIVER
20
15
5'51N
— TOP-OF5[O_PE
_
20
-
--
NEWCON UCf-
1
1
t
EXISTING POWER
I 1
SERVICEFORLIGHT-
a
Tx-
15
-STANDARD IN. THE AREA IS NOT.__{
10
LOCATED, CON1RACTOR ISTD VERIFY --
=1-
10
-DURING CONSTRUCTION 1
WATER. UNE
—
t^ ORDINARY HIGH:
5
_
--
_ _
0+00
1+00
STA: 9+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
RECEIVED
1*I1 4:r AAM
2+00
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
3-
6,
0
0
0
a
U
to
W
O
z
O
rn
W
V)
JW EE
Z
JZMU
.ra
1705
ZZ o�
g a c
z
- (/) +
ce (So
LIJ
L11 V A
LL >9N
Z03
(J)z
- /)LIJ
Z LL1 b 2
W M N
Z
d
IJJ o
J a
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
1-
z
LLI
J
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NRO4E WM
DATE: 01/08/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12 -108 -SITE PLAN
SHEET
REV.
SP3
3 0F3
A
SC BV & GREEN RIVER TRAIL
CONDUIT EXTENSION
PL13-002
E13-001 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
L13-002 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
City ' Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Phone: 206-431-3670
Fax: 206-431-3665
Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
File Number: L13-002
Applied: 01/15/2013
Approved: 05/23/2013
Expiration: 05/23/2015
A permit is hereby granted to: CONTOUR ENGINEERING to:
COMCAST JOB# 70164 - CONDUIT EXTENSION INCLUDES: GREEN RIVER TRAIL, COMFORT SUITES INN FAMILY FUN
CENTER, FT DENT
Upon the following property:
Address: 7100 FUN CENTER WY TUKW
Parcel Number: 0001 -
242304-9092
295490-0421
Section/Township/Range: SW -24-23-4
The following master program provisions are applicable to this development:
Goal 6.3 Economic Development, Goal 6.6 Access & Recreational U Goal 6.9 Natural Environment & H
Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions.
1: No closure of the Green River Trail is permitted; 2. Grassy areas shall be replanted with a native grass seed mix; 3.
No new bore pits will be allowed within the paved portion of the Green River Trail; 4. Areas with herbaceous plants
shall be replanted with an equal mix of Polystichum munitum - Western sword fern, Oxalis oregana - Wood sorrel, and
Tellima grandiflora - Fringecup. Planting density should include one fern per bore pit and one wood sorrel or fringecup
for each square foot of disturbed area.
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from
compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the
Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW).
This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project as approved and
any conditions thereof.
CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE
DATE OF RECEIPT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173-14-090, OR UNTIL
ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED;
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c).
Pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 the decision by the City of Tukwila to issue this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit may only be
appealed to the Shoreline Hearing Board. Appeals must be filed with the Shorelines Hearing Board within 21 -days from the filing of this
permit with D.O.E. as defined in RCW 90.58.140. For mdetail informon on appeals, refer to RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08.
Date 3AD
Jack Pa -, Director o3'Department of Community Development
Construction must begin within 2 years from the effective date of the permit and be substantially completed within 5 years of the
effective date of the permit.
The effective date of a substantial development permit shall be the date of receipt as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6).
doc: SHORELINE5
L13-002
Printed: 05-23-2013
May 22, 2013
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Department of Community Development
NOTICE OF DECISION
TO: Jeremy Haug, PE, Applicant
Kevin Kindle, SEFNCO Communications, Project Manager
WSDOT
• H2 Office, Property Owner
. Karen Walker, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
. Washington State Department of Ecology
Office of Attorney General
- King County Assessor
Jack Pace, Director
This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit
approval.
Project File Number:
Applicant:
Type of Permit:
Project Description:
Location:
Associated Files:
Comprehensive Plan
Designation/Zoning
District:
SM
L PROJECT DESCRIPTION
E13-001
Jeremy Haug, PE of Contour Engineering, LLC for SEFNCO Communications
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
This application is for a portion of a larger project to install 4" communication conduit along a
utility corridor. The conduit will be installed via directional drilling; bore pits will be installed
at intervals along the project's length. The conduit will be installed adjacent to the Green River
Trail as it runs along the northwest bank of the Green River. The trail and conduit extension are
principally in city -owned right-of-way. The application notes that a portion of the right-of-way is
under WSDOT control. The conduit will also cross over the Green River Trail pedestrian bridge.
The north side of the bridge is on a city -owned, undeveloped parcel (not right-of-way) and the
south end of the bridge is a public access easement on privately -owned and developed property.
Along the Green River Trail in the vicinity of I-405 and Interurban Avenue
PL13-002, L13-002
Public Right of Way, RCM and C/LI zoning
Page 1 of 2
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline NOD.doc
05/21/2013
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
L13-002, Southcenter Bridge and Green R. Trail Conduit Extension
Shoreline Substantial Development Notice Decision
April 26, 2013
II. DECISION
SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that the project does not create a
probably significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS).
Decision on Substantive Permit. The City Community Development Director has determined that the application for a
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit does comply with applicable city and state code requirements and has
approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision based on the findings and
conclusions contained in the staff report. The conditions of approval are set forth below:
1. No closure of the Green River Trail is permitted;
2. No new bore pits will be allowed within the paved portion of the Green River Trail.
3. Grassy areas shall be replanted with a native grass seed mix.
4. Areas with herbaceous plants shall be replanted with an equal mix of Polystichum munitum - Western sword
fern, Oxalis oregana — Wood sorrel, and Tellima grandiflora — Fringecup. Planting density should
include one fern per bore pit and one wood sorrel or fringecup for each square foot of disturbed area.
The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other
land use applications related to this project may still be pending.
III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS
One administrative appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board of the Decision is permitted. Any person appealing to the
Shorelines Hearings Board may raise certain SEPA issues as part of the appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appellants
should consult the rules and procedures of the Shorelines Hearings Board for details.
IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING
The requirements and procedures for appeals to the Shorelines Hearings Board are set forth in RCW 90.58 and WAC
461.08.
V. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION
Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter
Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project
planner is Stacy MacGregor who may be contacted at 206-433-7166 for further information.
Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King
County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be
removed at the expiration of the appeal period unless an appeal is filed.
Departm t of Community Development
City of wila
SM Page 2 of 2 05/21/2013
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline NOD.doc
City of Tukwila
Jinn Haggerton, Mayor
Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director
MEMORANDUM
May 9, 2013
TO: Jack Pace, Director
FM: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner
RE: Shoreline Permit: L13-002, Southcenter Bridge and Green River Trail Conduit Extension
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed project is to extend a PVC utility conduit along the Green River Trail. Part of a much larger project, this
portion of work occurs within the shoreline jurisdiction. A shoreline permit is necessary because the work is valued
above the exemption for cost limits and involves work over the water where the conduit is attached to a pedestrian bridge.
The conduit will be used for fiber optic cabling. The new 4" conduit will be installed adjacent to 1,100 linear feet of trail
and attached to the pedestrian bridge over the Green River where the Green River and Interurban Trails intersect. It will
be installed via directional drilling rather than open trenching. Bore pits will occur along the length of the corridor and
will be off the paved path. The bore pits will not result in the addition of impervious surface. The pit locations will be
restored to pre -construction conditions after the work is complete.
The Green River trail is a nineteen mile asphalt trail from south Seattle to south Kent. At Fort Dent Park, the Green River
Trail intersects with the Interurban Trail. The Interurban Trail starts at the north end of the pedestrian bridge and
continues to the south for fourteen miles ending in the town of Pacific. A utility easement already exists adjacent to the
trail where this work is proposed. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application and site plans are found in
Attachment A.
2. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM - BACKGROUND
The City of Tukwila adopted a new Shoreline Master Program (SMP) on August 15, 2011 which was approved by the
Washington State Department of Ecology on October 14, 2011 and became effective October 28, 2011.
A. Shoreline Environment Designation
The shoreline environment designation for the project is Urban Conservancy. The purpose of the Urban Conservancy
Environment is to protect ecological functions where they exist in urban and developed settings, and restore ecological
functions where they have been previously degraded, while allowing a variety of compatible uses.
The shoreline buffer in this portion of the Urban Conservancy environment is 100 feet (non-residential areas without
levees). The buffer width of 100 feet allows enough room to reconfigure the river bank to achieve a slope of 2.5:1, the
"angle of repose" or the maximum angle of a stable slope and allow for some restoration and improvement of shoreline
SM
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline SR.doc
Page 1 of6 05/21/2013
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
L13-002, Southcenter Bridge and Green R.
Shoreline Substantial Development
April 26, 2013
Trail Conduit Extension
function through the installation of native plants and other habitat features. The actual amount of area needed to achieve a
2.5:1 slope may be less than 100 feet, depending on the character of the river bank and can only be determined on a site -
by -site basis. (From the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program, pg. 67)
B. Shoreline Goals and Policies:
The following section discusses the Shoreline Master Program goals and policies that apply to this project and are
excerpted from Chapter 6 of the City's SMP.
Goal 6.3 Economic Development
Goal: Development along the shoreline that fosters the economic vitality of Tukwila while preserving the long-term
benefits of the river.
Response: The placement of an underground utility in a utility easement adjacent to the public trail will not impact the
river or be a detriment to the river.
6.6 Access and Recreational Use, Comprehensive Plan Goal 5.6
Goal: Increase the amount and diversity of opportunities for public recreation and access to and along the river, including
visual and cultural access, access to the water's edge, opportunities for small boat navigation and access, and connections
to other neighborhoods, consistent with the shoreline character.
• Policy 5.6.6: Support the implementation of the King County Green River Trail, per the existing King
County Green River Trail Master Plan as well as pedestrian/bicycle connections with the Trail from properties
on the opposite bank and the expansion of this trail where appropriate.
Response: The fiber conduit is within an existing utility corridor adjacent to the trail. There is no impact to the trail or
increase of impervious surface due to this project. The applicant has stated there will be no closures of the Green River
Trail. However, it is conceivable that a work perimeter will be established around equipment that may extend onto
portions of the trail. One location of proposed bore pit is within the asphalt portion of the Green River Trail and appears •
to be within an existing utility vault. Any impact will not close the trail and will only be temporary.
6.9 Natural Environment and Habitat Use
Goal: Restored, enhanced and protected natural environment resources along the river, including trees, wildlife habitat
and features with value for long-term public, scientific and educational uses.
• Policy 5.9.1: Ensure that shoreline development results in no net loss of shoreline ecological function,
minimizes impacts on wildlife and that significant vegetation, sandbars, wetlands, watercourses, and other
critical areas identified as important for habitat are maintained through the proper location, design,
construction, and management of all shoreline uses and activities.
Response: The applicant prepared a no net loss analysis (NNL), which is attached as part of Attachment A to this staff
report. The NNL addresses the mitigation sequencing criteria in the SMP. The response to mitigation sequencing, TMC
18.44.070 H3 is provided below:
a. Avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action:
SM Page 2 of 6 05/21/2013
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline SR.doc
L13-002, Southcenter Bridge and Gree
Shoreline Substantial Development
April 26, 2013
ver Trail Conduit Extension
The project will substantially avoid all impacts to the ecological functions of the shoreline as it does not permanently
impact vegetation, habitat, critical species or hydrologic processes. To minimize or avoid impacts, aside from the bore
pits, all work is taking place underground.
b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using
appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts.
The proposed project will minimize any impacts as it will not change the existing condition of the shoreline. The project
involved bore pits rather than open trenching to minimize impacts.
c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment:
The area of the bore pits will need to be re -planted with a native grass seed mix or native plants.
d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations;
Minimal maintenance is required for the conduit.
e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments;
and
It is expected that there will be no direct impacts to existing habitats or ecological processes.
f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective measures.
There are no direct impacts therefore there is no anticipated need for corrective measures.
3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS:
TMC 18.44.130 B3 Shoreline Administration states that a substantial development permit shall be granted only when the
development proposed is consistent with the shoreline master program. The relevant SMP policies were discussed above.
Below is a discussion of the relevant shoreline master program regulations that are incorporated into the zoning code that
apply to this permit application.
A. Permitted Uses:
TMC 18.44.050 identifies permitted uses in the Urban Conservancy environment - utilities are permitted inside the buffer
area.
This project does not involve the placement of structures and will not increase the presence of people in the area outside
of the construction period. The applicant stated that no work would be done on the trail and that that trail would not be
closed. While the plan set shows one bore pit within the paved trail area, a site visit to the area revealed that this location
is a preexisting vault. The City of Tukwila Public Works Department and the applicant verbally confirmed that there
would be no trail closure for this project.
Tukwila Municipal Code 18.08.020 states that all lands not classified according to the classification in TMC 18.08.010 on
the official zoning map, and all lands, if any, of the City not shown on the official zoning map, shall be considered
unclassified and, pending future classification, shall be subject to the restrictions and regulation of the LDR District.
Therefore, the zoning standards for this area are LDR.
B. Development Standards
SM Page 3 of 6 05/21/2013
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline SR.doc
L13-002, Southcenter Bridge and Green R
Shoreline Substantial Development
April 26, 2013
Trail Conduit Extension
TMC 18.44.070 C establishes development standards for the Urban Conservancy shoreline environment.
1. Standards: These include setbacks, site configuration, height restrictions and lighting standards. As this
project does not involve the construction of structures, setbacks, site configuration and height restrictions do
not apply.
2. Setbacks and Site Configuration: As structures are not proposed, these standards do not apply.
3. Height: The underground utility installation has no height therefore these standards do not apply.
4. Lighting: No lighting is proposed; these standards do not apply
5. Surface Water and Water Quality: No new structures or impervious surfaces are proposed; these standards do
not apply.
6. Flood Hazard Reduction: No flood hazard structures as included in this proposal.
7. Shoreline Stabilization: The project does not trigger the need for shoreline stabilization.
8. Archaeological, Cultural and Historical Resources: The Duwamish and Muckleshoot tribes were provided
notice of application. The Muckleshoot tribe asked clarifying questions. No known historical resources are
located in the area of the project. Should the developer uncover archeological resources, work shall stop
immediately and the City of Tukwila, the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
and affected Indian tribes shall be notified and the standards of TMC 18.44.070G apply.
9. Environmental Impact Mitigation: Projects are required to be designed so as to cause no net loss to shoreline
ecological functions. No net loss has been addressed above under the discussion of the consistency of this
project with shoreline goals and policies. A SEPA Determination of Non -Significance was issued under land
use file E13-001.
10. Off Street Parking and Loading Requirements: No parking, loading or storage facilities are proposed.
11. Land Altering Activities: No clearing, grading, landfills, or dredging will occur.
12. Marinas, Boat Yards, Dry Docks, Boat Launches, Piers, Docks, and Over -water Structures: Does not apply.
13. Signs in Shoreline Jurisdiction: Does not apply.
C. Vegetation Protection and Landscaping
TMC 18.44.080 provides requirements for landscaping in both the buffer and non -buffer areas of the shoreline
environment. The tree protection and retention requirements and the vegetation management requirements apply to
existing uses as well as new or re -development. The work is occurring within an existing utility corridor. There are no
trees that will be impacted by the project. The extent of landscaping required under TMC is based on the size of the
project; for smaller projects, the Director will determine a reasonable amount of landscaping to be carried out based on the
scope of the project. TMC 18.44.080 Clp(2) states that utility easements shall be landscaped with native groundcover,
grasses or other low -growing plants as appropriate to the shoreline environment and site conditions. The bore pits are
located adjacent to the trail. The areas where the pits are proposed are either grassy or contain shade tolerant shrubs; in a
few locations, where the bore pits are under or adjacent to an overpass, there is no vegetative growth. Because the area of
disturbance is minimal, the applicant did not provide a planting plan. Where bore pits are located in grassy areas, the area
should be reseeded with a native grass mix. In areas with herbaceous plants, the disturbed areas should be replanted with
native herbaceous plants. An appropriate plant palate would include a mix of western sword fern, wood sorrel and
fringecup. The areas that are under the overpass and do not have plant life do not require any mitigation.
D. Environmentally Sensitive Areas within the Shoreline Jurisdiction
TMC 18.44.090 provides requirements for development within environmentally sensitive areas. The proposal occurs
adjacent to the Green River Trail which is relatively flat and does not contain steep slopes, wetlands, watercourses or their
buffers.
E. Public Access to the Shoreline
SM Page 4 of 6 05/21/2013
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline SR.doc
L13-002, Southcenter Bridge and Gree
Shoreline Substantial Development
April 26, 2013
ver Trail Conduit Extension
TMC 18.44.100 addresses public access requirement for the SMP. Public access is required when a development or use
would create additional demand for public access through the addition of square footage to an existing building or the
intensification in land use through the conversion of a warehouse to retail or an office use. This project will not create
additional demand for public access as there is no building and the current use is not being changed.
F. Shoreline Design Guidelines
This section of the TMC does not apply (TMC 18.44.110) as no structures are being constructed.
G. Shoreline Restoration
TMC 18.44.120 does not apply. This is not a shoreline restoration project.
4. COMMENTS:
Clarifying questions were asked and answered during the Notice of Application period by Karen Walter, Watershed and
Land Use Team Leader for the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Her comments are attached. No other comments were
received.
5. SEPA:
A Determination of Non -Significance was issued on April 9, 2013. A copy of the SEPA determination and staff report is
included in the file
CONCLUSIONS
1. The project site is located adjacent to the Green River Trail; the majority of the project occurs in the right-of-way
which doesn't have a zoning designation. The parcels on either end of the pedestrian bridge are zoned RCM and
is C/LI. The proposed project is consistent with the land use and zoning designations.
2. The plans show one bore pit within the paved portion of the Green River Trail. This location has an existing
underground utility vault within the trail.
3. The City of Tukwila adopted a new Shoreline Master Program (SMP) on August 15, 2011; it was approved by the
Washington State Department of Ecology on October 14, 2011 and became effective October 28, 2011.
4. The shoreline environment designation for the project area is Urban Conservancy, with a buffer width of 100 feet.
5. No structures are proposed for the project.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the SMP.
7. The project has analyzed the no net loss provisions of the SMP and will avoid all direct impacts to the ecological
functions of the shoreline. The bore holes will disturb grassy areas, small shrubs in the shade areas, or unplanted
dirt beneath the bridges. Grassy areas will be replanted with a native grass see mix, unplanted dirt areas will
return to preexisting conditions. Areas that disturb shrubs will be replanted with a mix of native plants.
8. The proposed project is consistent with the applicable development standards of the SMP.
9. A Determination of Non -Significance was issued on April 5, 2013.
6. RECOMMENDATION
Approve the shoreline substantial development permit with the following conditions:
1. No closure of the Green River Trail is permitted;
2. No new bore pits will be allowed within the paved portion of the Green River Trail.
3. Grassy areas shall be replanted with a native grass seed mix.
SM Page 5 of 6 05/21/2013
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline SR.doc
L13-002, Southcenter Bridge and Green 1?
Shoreline Substantial Development
April 26, 2013
Trail Conduit Extension
4. Areas with herbaceous plants shall be replanted with an equal mix of Polystichum munitum - Western sword
fern, Oxalis oregana — Wood sorrel, and Tellima grandiflora — Fringecup. Planting density should
include one fern per bore pit and one wood sorrel or fringecup for each square foot of disturbed area.
7. ATTACHMENTS
A. Permit application, No Net Loss Response and site plans
B. Questions from Karen Walkers, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
SM Page 6 of 6 05/21/2013
H:\PL13-002 SSB Bridge Crossing\L13-002 Shoreline SR.doc
Stacy MacGregor
From: Karen Walter <KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:45 AM
To: Stacy MacGregor
Subject: Green River Trail to Family Fun Center conduit project PL13-002, Notice of Application
for SEPA and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Stacy,
Thank you for sending us the Notice of Application materials for the Green River Trail to Family Fun Center via Pedestrian
Bridge conduit project referenced above. We have reviewed these materials and have some questions:
1. When exactly does the applicant propose to construct this project?
2. Will the applicant seek temporary closures of the Green River trail or other areas along the Green River to construct the
project?
3. What exactly is the vegetation that will be removed to construct the project? Where is it and how much will be
removed? Specifically, we are seeking more information if any trees or shrubs along the Green River will be removed as
part of this project and if they will be replaced/mitigated?
We look forward to the City and/or applicant's responses to these questions. We may comments subsequently.
Best regards,
Karen Walter
Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division
Habitat Program
39015 172nd Ave SE
Auburn, WA 98092
253-876-3116
1
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Northwest Regional Office • 3190 160th Ave SE • Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 • 425-649-7000
711 for Washington Relay Service • Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341
May 31, 2013
Jeremy Haug
Contour Engineering
3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
JUN 05 2013
• c;oMinui'
DEVELOPMENT
Re: City of Tukwila Permit L13-002 - Approved
Contour Engineering - Applicant
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SDP) 2013 -NW -1764
Dear Mr. Haug:
On May 29, 2013, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Tukwila approved
your application for an SDP. Your permit is to extend a PVC utility conduit along the Green
River Trail. Your project is located within the shoreline jurisdiction of the Green River.
By law, local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with:
• The Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW)
• Ecology's Substantial Development Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27-150 WAC)
• The Tukwila Local Shoreline Master Program
Local governments, after reviewing SDPs for compliance, are required to submit them to
Ecology. Your approved SDP has been received by Ecology.
What Happens Next?
Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you wait at least 21 days
from May 29, 2013, the "date of filing". This waiting period allows anyone (including you) who
disagrees with any aspect of this permit, to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings
Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities
authorized by this permit.
The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We
recommend you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to
ensure no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 664-9160 or
http://www.eho.wa.gov/
If yo want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at
the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the
Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac.
0
Jeremy Haug
May 31, 2013
2 of 2
Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact David Pater at (425) 649-4253.
S
David'ater, Shoreline Specialist
Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program
DP:cja
cc: Kevin Kindle, SEFNCO Communications
Stacy MacGregor, City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space -permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Department of Ecology
NW Regional Office
3190 - 160th Ave. SE
Bellevue, WA 98008
Low C--i.5-Carlo
COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
A. S' re
`v
X
611(l'
'
13NReceived by (Prfn d Narnb) C. D to of Deliver)
,)arae T4 ri,t�'_.C1211;
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 1 ❑
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
❑ Agent
(] Addresser
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ❑ press Mail
❑ Registered .�Retum Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label)'
7009 2250 0002 2865 7281
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-154
UNITED STATES Poc '!2 '.
c) 'KAY .2013 F'3i4
RECEIVED
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DVL
6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD, STE 100
TUKWILA WA 98188
ri
RJ
u1
c0
RJ
RJ
LAIO
O
RJ
RJ
D-.
N
U.S. Postal ServiceTM
CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPTAk
(b mestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coveragevided)
For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comg,
AL USE
Postage
Certified Fee
Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
Total Posta
Sent To
Street, Apt. N[
or PO Box No.
City, State, Zit
Postmark
Here
Department of Ecology
NW Regional Office
3190 - 160th Ave. SE
Bellevue, WA 98008
PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY•F TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA
98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail: tukplana:ci.tukwila.wa.us
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS
PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY
ss
COUNTY OF KING
The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows:
1. I am the current owner of the property, which is the subject of this application.
2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent.
4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real
property, located at
for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose.
5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the
City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City.
6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of
fees.
EXECUTED atVUVwA-' (city), /(state), on AN C'
5-6b Com, c �
(Address) r , ` q c>v�
On this day personally appeared before me
(Print Name
(Phone Number)
(Signature)
?Co*
to me known to be the individual who executed
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes
mentioned therein. /�
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEF RE ME ON THIS 9` DAY OF Ma 1 20/ 3
Raurt,e A-G(}e((�
OTARY PUBLIC ' an for a State of Washington
residing at �(({ ,c) I ,the
My Commission expires on:
W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\Reasonable Use Exception-Jan2011.doc
,a.
if 40S/ N
74
i 1 - • ,
5' (A 4)OBVP
?9.1A
44Z WASkWe
SEFNCO
COMMUNICATIONS
SEFNCO Communications
4610 Tacoma Ave
Sumner, WA. 98390
M: 877-385-2903
F: 866-492-7240
January 8, 2013
City of Tukwila
COMCAST JT# 70164 (Comfort Inn Suites -Family Fun Center -Fort Dent)
Total job cost for bore through trail and bridge work.
• (1100') landscape bore $14.25 per foot
• (6) vaults placed $116.22 each
• (1100') Cable placement $0.74 per foot
• (6) Splice passive $60.36 each
• Bridge Bid $6500.00
Total Job Cost = $24,048.70
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely
Kevin Kindle (253)-606-5423
Outside Plant Engineer
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
To: City of Tukwila
Cc: Client, file
C
;111F
ENGINEER 1 N G •LLC
TRANSMITTAL
Contour Engineering PLLC
3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Gig Harbor WA 98335
PH: (253)857-5454 FAX (253)857-5458
From: Jeremy Haug, P.E.
Date: January 9th, 2013
Regarding: Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit Application
Project Number: 12-108
Accompanying this transmittal are the following documents:
Date
# Copies
Description
1/9/13
1
Application Form (original)
1/9/13
1
Application Checklist
1/8/13
1
Project Value Documentation
1/9/13
5
Project Description Summary
1/9/13
5
Shoreline Site Plan and Cross Sections 22"x34" (3 sheets)
1/9/13
5
Civil Plans 22"x34" (4 sheets)
1/9/12
1
Copies of Shoreline Site Plan and Cross Sections, and Civil
Plans 11"x17"
1/9/12
1
Copy of SEPA Environmental Checklist
1/9/12
1
CD containing electronic files
Application Fee Check
ENGINEERING • L L C
CIVIL ENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING 0 LAND PLANNING
January 9, 2013 Revised February 12, 2013
City of Tukwila
Planning & Community Development
3309 56th St. NW, Suite #106
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
Phone: 253-857-5454
Fax: 253-509-0044
Email: infoCc�contourpllc.com
Re: General Project Description Summary and "No net loss" response for Southcenter Blvd &
Green River Trail Conduit Extension
Dear City of Tukwila,
This summary accompanies the Substantial Shoreline Development package for the Southcenter
Boulevard & Green River Trail Conduit Extension.
General Proiect Description Summary
The proposed utility project is to extend a 4" communication conduit along the Green River Trail from
Southcenter Boulevard to Fort Dent Way. The conduit will be extended via directional drilling so bore
pits will be required and spaced out along the project run. Conduit will also be extended over the
Green River along the pedestrian foot bridge of the Green River Trail.
Currently, the project area is within Tukwila public right-of-way, except at two locations where the
bore path will cross WSDOT right of way, beneath the bridge spans of SR 181, and the westbound I-
405 on and off -ramp. The bridge abutments, retaining walls and foot bridge are the only structures
within the project area. The Green River Trial is an asphalt paved trail which follows along the river
and crosses beneath the two bridges. The conduit path will be located along the northwest side of
the trail with the bore pits designed to be outside of the paved path. Vegetation will be re -planted
and/or re-established at bore pit locations.
This project will not add to or increase the intensity of the area and will not add any new impervious
surfaces. No modifications to the shoreline of the Green River are proposed so there is no Toss of
shoreline function. No pedestrian access to the trail will be impeded by the project.
"No net loss" response
1. The existing shoreline and riverbank area are currently vegetated with native deciduous trees and
brush. The slope of the bank is approximately 2:1 which is covered with blackberry, brushes and
other type's vegetation. No visible evidence of erosion exists within the 200' shoreline area. An
existing asphalt paved pedestrian pathway (Green River Trail) exists just above the top of slope.
An existing underground utility corridor along the pathway exists which also includes light
standards along the path.
Two bridges span the river in the project area. Columns are constructed within the slope of the
river.
2. The proposed conduit project will not change or negatively affect the existing condition of the
shoreline.
3.32A\ucico c2/ )3
3. (See attached sheet)
4. a. Minimal open trenching is to take place to preserve existing vegetation
b. Directional boring technology is to be utilized
c. Areas of bore pits affected will be re -vegetated
d. Minimal maintenance will be required for the conduit
e. Not Applicable
f. Monitoring of the project impacts is to be done by contractor
Please contact me with any questions or if additional information is requested.
Sinc-rely,
Jeremy . Haug, P.E.
Contour Engineering, LLC
3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Gig Harbor, Washington 98335
NT UP
ENGINEERING • L L C
CIVIL ENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING 0 LAND PLANNING
January 9, 2013
City of Tukwila
Planning & Community Development
3309 56th St. NW, Suite #106
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
Phone: 253-857-5454
Fax: 253-509-0044
Email: info(@contourplIc.com
RECEIVED
1JAN 112013'
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Re: General Project Description Summary and "No net loss" response for Southcenter Blvd &
Green River Trail Conduit Extension
Dear City of Tukwila,
This summary accompanies the Substantial Shoreline Development package for the Southcenter
Boulevard & Green River Trail Conduit Extension.
General Project Description Summary
The proposed utility project is to extend a 4" communication conduit along the Green River Trail from
Southcenter Boulevard to Fort Dent Way. The conduit will be extended via directional drilling so bore
pits will be required and spaced out along the project run.
Currently, the project area is within Tukwila public right-of-way, except at two locations where the
bore path will cross WSDOT right of way, beneath the bridge spans of SR 181, and the westbound 1-
405 on and off -ramp. The bridge abutments and retaining walls are the only structures within the
project area. The Green River Trial is an asphalt paved trail which follows along the river and crosses
beneath the two bridges. The conduit path will be located along the northwest side of the trail with
the bore pits designed to be outside of the paved path. Vegetation will be re -planted and/or re-
established at bore pit locations.
This project will not add to or increase the intensity of the area and will not add any new impervious
surfaces. No modifications to the shoreline of the Green River are proposed so there is no loss of
shoreline function. No pedestrian access to the trail will be impeded by the project.
"No net Toss" response
1. The existing shoreline and riverbank area are currently vegetated with native deciduous trees and
brush. The slope of the bank is approximately 2:1 which is covered with blackberry, brushes and
other type's vegetation. No visible evidence of erosion exists within the 200' shoreline area. An
existing asphalt paved pedestrian pathway (Green River Trail) exists just above the top of slope.
An existing underground utility corridor along the pathway exists which also includes light
standards along the path.
Two bridges span the river in the project area. Columns are constructed within the slope of the
river.
2. The proposed conduit project will not change or negatively affect the existing condition of the
shoreline.
3. (See attached sheet)
4. a. Minimal open trenching is to take place to preserve existing vegetation.
b. Directional boring technology is to be utilized.
c. Areas of bore pits affected will be re -vegetated.
d. Minimal maintenance will be required for the conduit.
e. Not Applicable.
f. Monitoring of the project impacts is to be done by contractor.
Please contact me with any questions or if additional information is requested.
Sincerely,
Jere 1 y F. Haug, P.E.
Contour Engineering, LLC
3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106
Gig Harbor, Washington 98335
5 152nd St
loan oq�h�rytP TtP�la
1s --7:. .-%--�
Crystal �. %r t
•ngs Path 4c, $ S
x'outhcenter Mall
tWestfield.I
O• i 5outhcentr
y 1541 7 �fa11 1
_Cy
u tii
th St
1st `Tukwila
Pond
Park
Baker Blvd
W
1
\`;*
--•
� Vii✓
7.
Fam y41/4\C't/ �� . •- SW 16th St.
Centers 1,
.1 Boeing Lonoacresi
Industrial Park i
I�
VI
4V 27th St
SW 19th St
Old Ave SW
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
NO NET LOSS CHECKLIST
What is No Net Loss?
The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA) requires protection of the natural resources and
ecological functions of the shoreline environment. Ecological functions are processes that characterize the
river and its shoreline and form habitats for water- and land-based wildlife and vegetation. Ecological
processes depend on the geology, soil type, topography, climate, and other physical characteristics in the
region. In the Green/Duwamish River watershed, key ecological processes include:
• river flows, tidal fluctuations and saltwater influences;
• creation, transport and deposition of sediment (for example scouring of soils, and erosion and
formation of mud -flats or beaches);
• transport of nutrients (from decomposition of plants and other organic materials);
• provision of woody debris from fallen limbs and trees along the banks or in the water (the trunks
and branches help form pools for fish); and
• water quality (such as vegetation that can help to filter out pollutants that are washed into the river
from parking lots and vegetation that can help reduce temperatures in the river, important for fish,
especially salmon).
These physical and biological processes comprise the ecological functions of the shoreline.
The state guidelines that implement the SMA, adopted in 2003, establish the standard of "no net loss" of
shoreline ecological functions for land uses and development within the shoreline jurisdiction. The No Net
Loss standard is designed to stop the introduction of new negative impacts to shoreline ecological functions
resulting from new development. Tukwila's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) defines no net loss as a:
"...standard intended to ensure that shoreline development or uses, whether permitted or exempt, are
located and designed to avoid loss or degradation of shoreline ecological functions that are
necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources."
In other words, the existing conditions of the shoreline ecological functions should not deteriorate due to new
permitted development or new land use. A loss of ecological function can occur when a physical condition
such as vegetation along the shoreline is removed or when habitat is altered through the construction of a
dock or pier or other structures over this habitat. In order to maintain shoreline ecological functions,
negative impacts must be mitigated to restore an equivalent amount of ecological function. The approach to
mitigation must follow the mitigation sequencing steps adopted in the SMP (see next page). It should be
noted that the SMA and the City's SMP also require improvement of shoreline functions, and therefore, some
re -vegetation of the shoreline will be required in proportion to the scale of the project, regardless of whether
there is a net loss to ecological functions.
CPL Page 13 of 14
W:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Pennits\4-11-12 SSDP
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
On a separate sheet of paper, please respond to the following questions to evaluate your
project's impacts and assist in analyzing whether there will be a net loss to shoreline
ecological functions requiring mitigation:
1. Describe the existing condition of the shoreline area and riverbank. For example, what plants and
how much vegetation currently exist within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction; what is the condition
of the shoreline (how steep are the banks, is there any erosion or slope failure, what are the soils like);
is there "hard armoring" on the riverbank (for example, concrete or wooden bulkheads, metal sheet
piling, rip -rap [rocks or concrete/asphalt blocks]), is there paving or are there any structures within the
200 ft. shoreline jurisdiction; are there any docks, piers, decks or other structures near or over the
water; are there any above -ground or below ground utilities; etc.?
2. How will your project change the existing condition of the shoreline described above?
3. Please respond to the questions in the following chart - A No Net Loss analysis (prepared by a
qualified biologist) must be prepared if the response to any of the questions in the chart below is
"yes":
4. The way to achieve no net loss of ecological function is to mitigate the loss through one or a
combination of the mitigation sequencing steps identified below. If preparing a No Net Loss analysis,
please discuss how your project addresses the following mitigation sequencing steps (TMC 18.44.070
H.3.):
a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation
by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment;
d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations;
e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or
environments; and
f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective
measures.
CPL Page 14 of 14
W:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Pennits\4-11-12 SSDP
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
WILL THE PROJECT:
NO
YES
a.
Alter/remove vegetation in the shoreline jurisdiction?
x
b.
Alter the river bank (i.e. re -slope bank, add armoring etc.)?
d
c.
Add fill in the shoreline jurisdiction?
ie
d.
Discharge new stormwater to the river?
X
e.
Store or use hazardous materials in the shoreline jurisdiction?
X
f.
Construct an in- or over -water structure?
X
g.
Increase impervious surface in the shoreline jurisdiction?
X
4. The way to achieve no net loss of ecological function is to mitigate the loss through one or a
combination of the mitigation sequencing steps identified below. If preparing a No Net Loss analysis,
please discuss how your project addresses the following mitigation sequencing steps (TMC 18.44.070
H.3.):
a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation
by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment;
d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations;
e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or
environments; and
f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective
measures.
CPL Page 14 of 14
W:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Pennits\4-11-12 SSDP
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
•
•
COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST
The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the
Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if
you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not
begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED.
The initial application materials, once deemed complete, allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's
rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with
development standards.
City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of
Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works).
* Please note that the application fee listed in the Land Use Fee schedule covers up to a
specified number of review hours and is due at the time an application is received by
the City. Review hours over the retainer fee will be charged at $92.00 per hour and the
applicant will receive a monthly bill when those fees become due.
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required.
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning.
APPLICATION MATERIALS:
Z1.
Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application.
2. Completed Application Form (page 7) and notarized Hold Harmless Agreement (page 9) (5
copies).
3. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule for Standard App fee. *Add'1 fees may incur
✓
4. Project Value Documentation.
5. Public Notice Materials and fee. See item A (page 4) for details.
6. Project Description/Analysis (5 copies) and other environmental reports (2copies). See item B
(page 4) for details.
7. Drawings (5 copies) Additional copies may be required upon determination that the application
is complete:
a). Site Plan See item C (page 4) for details.
✓
b). Site Cross Sections along the shoreline . See item D (page 5) for details.
/VA
c). Landscape Plans. See item E (page 5) for details.
✓
d). Civil Plans. See item F (page 5) for details.
/�
NA-
e). Other plans to help explain the project such as elevations, lighting plan, signage etc. See item
G (page 6) for details.
✓
8. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17".
t/
9. An electronic copy of all project application materials.
J
10. Other land use applications, as applicable: SEPA Environmental Checklist, Design Review
Application (see TMC 18.44.110 for review criteria), Special Permission, Director, for buffer
reduction requests.
CPL Page 3 of 14
W:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Permits\4-11-12 SSDP Perrnit
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required.
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning.
A. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS:
1. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to Fast Signs Tukwila or
Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a
complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout).
2. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; Or provide
an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses)
within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments,
condos, trailer parks—must be induded.
Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of
the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each
of these fields as an individual column:
Name
Street Address
City, St, Zip
Mr. Smith
1234 Park Ave S
Tukwila WA 98188
PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you
provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice
Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. You will receive a separate bill for this fee and payment
is due prior to issuance of the decision.
3. If providing your own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which highlights each
property within 500 feet of the project, and are induded on the mailing list.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS:
1. Vicinity Map with site location - does not have to be to scale.
V
2. Provide:
a) a written discussion of project consistency with the Review Guidelines(see page 11), or a
reference on plan sheets illustrating compliance with the Review Guidelines; and
b) a response to the No Net Loss Checklist (see pages 13-14).
Check with a planner if you are unsure what criteria apply to your project.
NA
3. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies if needed per TMC 18.44.090 D (Environmentally
Sensitive Areas within the shoreline jurisdiction section of the SMP).
4. Provide an analysis of river bank stability if alteration of the riverbank is proposed. See TMC
18.06.696 for the definition of a riverbank analysis and report.
NA
5. Provide two copies of any other studies prepared for the project (Biological Assessment etc.).
C. SHORELINE SITE PLAN:
✓
1. The site plan must indude a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x
36".
2. Identify existing top of bank, landward and riverward toe of levee (or toe of bank if no levee),
ordinary high water mark and base flood elevation (i.e., the 100 year flood).
N
3. For work riverward of the OHWM: Distance work extends into the river and distance to Federal
projects and navigation channels.
✓
4. Identify the location of the shoreline buffer (measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark)
applicable to the shoreline environment in which the project is located:
CPL Page 4 of 14
W:\\Long Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Permits\4-11-12 SSDP Permit
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required.
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning.
J
• Shoreline Residential Buffer - show where the top of the river bank would be at a 2.5:1 slope
from OHWM and add twenty feet. If there is not enough room on the parcel for this buffer,
the minimum buffer width is 50 ft.;
• Urban Conservancy Buffer —100 ft. non -levee area; 125 ft. in leveed area;
• High Intensity Buffer -100 ft.
• The Aquatic Environment includes the area waterward of the OHWM and does not have an
identified buffer.
NA
5. Show any levee/riverbank maintenance easements.
NA
6. Construction limit lines and areas of dearing/grading/filling. See TMC 18.44.070 J for land
altering regulations. Removal of any significant trees or native vegetation in the shoreline
jurisdiction requires a Shoreline Tree Removal and Vegetation Clearing Permit.
-V
7. Show public access and/or trails per TMC 18.44.100.
V
8. Show building footprint, parking lots, driveways, loading and service areas. See TMC 18.44.070 I
for parking regulations.
V
9. Identify any sensitive areas and their buffers, as applicable.
D. CROSS-SECTIONS FOR SHORELINE PROJECTS
V
SHORELINE CROSS SECTIONS at maximum 75' intervals along the shoreline showing:
1. Existing and proposed elevations and improvements;
2. Limits of the applicable shoreline buffer and 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction, as measured from the
OHWM;
3. The top of bank elevation, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, ordinary high water
mark and base flood elevation (i.e., the 100 year flood as determined by the Federal Emergency
Management Administration - FEMA), and levee/ riverbank maintenance easement and the
location of the top of bank at a 2.5:1 slope.
E. LANDSCAPE PLAN:
nl A
1 •
1. Landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect or an approved
biologist. Plans must indude the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings, soil
preparation and amendment, irrigation, weed management, mulching and maintenance plan.
Invasive vegetation must be removed and native vegetation planted. Maximum size 24" x 36". See
TMC 18.44.080 for requirements.
f
2. Show all existing trees over 4" in caliper, indicating those to be retained, those to be removed and
any tree protection measures required. Any trees removed over 4" in caliper are subject to the
replacement requirements of TMC 18.44.080 B.4.
Ar
/v
3. Provide notes on landscaping sheets that address consistency of landscaping with requirements
of TMC 18.44.
F. CIVIL PLANS:
,/
1. One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed
professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36".
/
2. Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to
NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See
www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/bulletins/cablist.html Bulletin A7 and related documents for further
information.
3. Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals.
CPL Page 5 of 14
W:\\Long Range Projects\ShorelineWew Shoreline Permits\4-11-12 SSDP Permit
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
Check items
submitted
with
application
Information Required.
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning.
✓
4. Construction limit lines, areas of clearing/grading/filling including volume and type of expected
cut and fill.
V
5. Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements.
•�
('
6. If additional impervious surface is proposed, provide a storm drainage design at least 90%
complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). For guidance
on preparation of the Technical Information Report contact the Public Works Dept. or go to:
www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwpermit.html#SURFWATER.
See also TMC 18.44.070 D for additional surface water regulations.
✓
7. Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps which are
available at the Tukwila Public Works Department counter.
✓
8. Show all site improvements including footprints of all existing and proposed buildings, paved
areas and any shoreline stabilization structures proposed in the shoreline. See TMC 18.44.070 E.
✓
9. Show fences, rockeries and retaining walls.
✓
10. Show docks and other overwater structures. See TMC 18.44.070 K.
G. OTHER PLANS:
NA
1. If new construction is proposed, provide dimensioned and scalable building elevations with
keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening.
fin
2. If site lighting changes are proposed, provide a luminaire plan including location and type of
street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and what
measures will be used to shield adjacent properties and the river from glare.
/0"
3. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. See TMC 18.44.070 L.
NA
4. Any other drawings or materials needed to explain your proposal.
CPL Page 6 of 14
W:\\L.ong Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Permits\4-1 1-12 SSDP Permit
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
R' CEI' -7D
JAN 1t5 2013'
CITY OF TUKWILA Del IM& SHORELINE
�Le3a-tea
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail: Planning@tukwilawa.gov
SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT
APPLICATION
FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -SHORE
Planner:
File Number: L_, /`1 _ na
Application Complete (Date:
)
Project File Number: ---PL, \ —06 a
Application Incomplete (Date:
)
Other File Numbers: 1 — Z., c)
So • "76 14) t-{
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:
Southcenter Blvd & Green River Trail Conduit Extension
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and
subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection.
Along Green River Trail, from Southcenter Blvd to Fort Dent Way
LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement or NWMaps.net).
All work is within City public lands - right-of-way and parcel 295490-0421
PROJECT VALUE (PLEASE ATTACH DOCUMENTATION): $24,048.70
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping
development standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: Jeremy Haug, P.E. - Contour Engineering LLC
Address: 3309 56th St. NW, Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335
Phone: (253) 857-5454 FAX: (253) 509-0044
E-mail: 'ere@contourpllc.com
Signature: Date: / — q1— 2.0 13
CPL Page 7 of 14
W:\\L.ong Range Projects\Shoreline\New Shoreline Permits \4-11-12 SSDP
\ A -a,A 1 1-. r✓\ o c- v. 17"?.
09/13/2012 10:15 AM
0j)MCoui- ku
CI-G14A,\
ebb � `36 t � -,
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 INCH = 100 FEET
POTHOLING NOTE
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL
LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AT AU. PROPOSED CONNECTION
POINTS AND CROSSINGS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF VERTICAL AND/OR HORIZONTAL
LOCATIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON PLANS, OR IF THERE
APPEARS TO BE A CROSSING CONFLICT, CONTACT AND PROVIDE THE
INFORMATION TO CONTOUR ENGINEERING LLC IMMEDIATELY
FOR POSSIBLE DESIGN CHANGES.
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS
BEFORE YOU DIG
(800) 424-5555
SURVEYOR
CONTOUR ENGINEERING LLC
SURVEYOR: STEVE WOODS PIS
3309 56TH ST. NW, STE 106
GIG HARBOR, WA 98335
BASIS OF BEARING
WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID NORTH ZONE(4601) COORDINATES
AS DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATION. NAD 83/ GEOID09(CONUS).
VERTICAL DATUM
BASE:
WSDOT # GP17405•62: FOUND "2/" IN 3" BRASS DISC AT SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF BRIDGE ON 66TH AVE. SOUTH AND 1405.
ELEVATION 58.655 (NAVD 88)
CORPSCON CONVERSION TO NGVD 29 I5 55.118 (-3.537)
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1) THE MONUMENT CONTROL SHOWN FOR THIS SITE WAS ACCOMPLISHED
BY FIELD TRAVERSE UTILIZING A TWO (2) SECOND THEODOLITE
WITH INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING METER
(TRIMBLE S-3) AND REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) / STATIC GLOBAL
POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)(TRIMBLE R8). LINEAR AND ANGULAR
CLOSURE OF THE TRAVERSES MEET THE STANDARDS OF WAC
332-130-090.
2) UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE.
ONLY THOSE WHICH ARE VISIBLE OR HAVING VISIBLE EVIDENCE
OF THEIR INSTALLATION ARE SHOWN HEREON.
3) THIS SURVEY REPRESENTS. PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT CONDITIONS AS
THEY EXISTED OCTOBER 8, 2012, THE DATE OF THIS FIELD SURVEY.
4) THIS 15 NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
5) OFFSET DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR
TO PROPERTY LINES.
6) IT 15 NOT THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY TO SHOW EASEMENTS OR
RESERVATIONS WHICH MAY EFFECT THIS 517E.
FILL SPECIFICATION
FILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN PETROLEUM
PRODUCTS, OR SUBSTANCES WHICH ARE HAZARDOUS,
DANGEROUS, TOXIC, OR WHICH OTHERWISE VIOLATE ANY
STATE, FEDERAL, OR LOCAL LAW ORDINANCE, CODE,
REGULATION, RULE, ORDER, OR STANDARD. ONLY EARTH
MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN FILLS.
UTILITY NOTES
EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS
W/5 OBTAINED FROM BEST AVAILABLE SOURCES AT ME TIME
OF DESIGN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBILE
FOR THE RELOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND
CONFLICTING UTILITIES DEPICTED OR NOT DEPICTED ON
THESE PLANS.
TRENCH NOTES
IF WORKERS ENTER ANY TRENCH OR OTHER EXCAVATION FOUR OR
MORE FEET IN DEPTH THAT DOES NOT MEET THE OPEN PIT
REQUIREMENTS OF WSDOT SECTION 2-09.3(3)8, IT SHALL 8E SHORED
AND CRIBBED. THE CONTRACTOR I5 ALONE RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKER
SAFETY. ALL TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE WASHINGTON INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, CHAPTER
49.17 RCW.
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
IMAGE MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CEW"'1)
'JAN 115 2013'
COMMUNY7y
DEVELOP�riE�
0
0
DESCRIPTION
z
0
ct
0'
(k)
▪ Lu
- z H
J
J 5 m
1708
Z58°
- Z = 2
ce/3
.0
>-
LTJ
cc a-
Z� z 2
, 8
W 5 A
ZL I
z rn
z"
W
J a
U
COVER SHEET
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
H
z
J
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: 8. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 723 RO4E WM
DATE: 01/09/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12-108-C
SHEET
REV.
C1
1 OF 4
A
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
POTHOLE AND LOCATE POWER
SERVICE AT CROSSING
-
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 60
BORE PIT
POTHOLE AND LOCATE GAS AND WATER
LINES ALONG BORE ALIGNMENT
POTHOLE AND LOCATE POWER
SERVICE AT CROSSING
--40
1 INCH = 30 FEET
AND LOCATE POWER,
GAS, AND WATER UTILITIES
ALONG BORE ALIGNMENT
— —
5.
POTHOLING NOTE
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL
LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AT ALL PROPOSED CONNECTION
POINTS AND CROSSINGS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF VERTICAL AND/OR HORIZONTAL
LOCATIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT L5 SHOWN ON PIANS, OR IF THERE
APPEARS TO BEA CROSSING CONFLICT, CONTACT AND PROVIDE THE
INFORMATION TO CONTOUR ENGINEERING LW IMMEDIATELY
FOR POSSIBLE DESIGN CHANGES.
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION NOTE:
BASED ON THE CURRENT FEMA FIRM MAP, THE 100 YR ROOD ELEVATION
NEAR THE INTERURBAN AVE BRIDGE IS 25.33' (NAVD 88).
THE ELEVATION AT THE SOUTHCENTER BLVD BRIDGE I5 25,74' (NAVD 88)
THE PROJECT BORE PATH FALLS BETWEEN THOSE TWO ELEVATIONS,
'
100 YR ROOD ELEVATION
25.74' (NAVD 88)
AM
■ BORE PIT
W •
Z
BARE PIT
o -king
POTHOLE AND LOCATE POWER
SERVICE AT CROSSING
■
•v f_�,c q,
Retaining wa77 - --1111.117111.1" f-
■ .�j
III I"
—1) ______
-o---i
°r
100 YR FLOOD UNE a� ' ' ., ■
MIyf /
POrldQ LE WATER AND /GAS L[NES
AC RE�ALIGI�Mti4T .
._.,��..—
p._--- moi.
POTHOLE i%—
ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
GREEN RIVER
POTHOLE AND LOCATE POWER SERVICE
AT CROSSING, PRESERVE EXISTING
RETAINING WALL
/
9`n
Nm:i?
ON,D
F,m
2Z
tJp
52 LF 4" PVC
(DIRECTIONAL BORE)''?,,
52 LF4"PVC
(DIRECTIONAL BORE)
Gas Oa1nt
■
ma
717LF4'1PVC
'(0QEECTIONAL BORE)
•\ —3
BORE PIT
POTHOLE AND LOCATE STORM
OUTLET PIPE, AND UNKNOWN
UTILITY AT CROSSING
c)P4(-FN44
ke
ROOD ELEVATION
25.33' (NAVD 88)
Y HIGH WATER MARK
n,,
• C MED
SAH 1'5 2013
4/3 -oaf commuIIIY
arcvl+�.oPwt��;
DESCRIPTION
z
LLJ
0
03
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
H
2
W
U
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NRO4EWM
DATE: 01/09/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12-108-C
SHEET
REV.
C2
2 OF 4
A
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
BORE PATH CROSS SECTIONS
0+00
60
1+00
STA: 5+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
55
60
50 "'VEIN
= —kil��R"
50
45 m--mwm_Agimi-il.r - 45
40
55
35
i—�
30 '–)
25
35
30
ate."• s �r�=� = �---
25
15
0+00
13
1+00
STA: 3+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
STA: 6+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
55
40
35 _ �s�
30
- --n _=
25
20
15
10
H-- 20
25
0+00
1+00
STA: 3+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
30
2+00
STA: 6+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
0
0+00
1+00
STA: 4+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION NOTE:
BASED ON THE CURRENT FEMA FIRM MAP, THE 100 YR ROOD ELEVATION
NEAR THE INTERURBAN AVE BRIDGE IS 25.33' (NAND 88). 7 • e"'
THE ELEVATION AT THE SOUTHCENTER BLVD BRIDGE IS 25.74' �OJRGOi. C i 4. f
THE PROJECT BORE PATH FALLS BETWEEN THOSE TWO ELEVATIONS.
1JAN 15 2013
j3 --CO 2 COMMUNITY
DEVELOMZNT
m
DESCRIPTION
VN
Z 8 p
�
17z3
zg$':
CCs'
09
w>N
z
— 2
E
Ce
Iw
Z°T
z`^°°
Z"
w g
—I 0 -
CROSS SECTIONS
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
• PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER:
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NRO4E WM
DATE: 01/09113
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12-108-C
SHEET 1 REV.
C3 z\
3 OF
45
_ra�Sr_r•�
45
rTt r taM
W..��...
-9�_
35
40
= s , T..
—
• 25
25
:.
,r•Ic
>=
D
e,re-oc ••
20
1515
_10
20
10
0+00
1+00
STA: 4+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
2+00
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION NOTE:
BASED ON THE CURRENT FEMA FIRM MAP, THE 100 YR ROOD ELEVATION
NEAR THE INTERURBAN AVE BRIDGE IS 25.33' (NAND 88). 7 • e"'
THE ELEVATION AT THE SOUTHCENTER BLVD BRIDGE IS 25.74' �OJRGOi. C i 4. f
THE PROJECT BORE PATH FALLS BETWEEN THOSE TWO ELEVATIONS.
1JAN 15 2013
j3 --CO 2 COMMUNITY
DEVELOMZNT
m
DESCRIPTION
VN
Z 8 p
�
17z3
zg$':
CCs'
09
w>N
z
— 2
E
Ce
Iw
Z°T
z`^°°
Z"
w g
—I 0 -
CROSS SECTIONS
SHEET TITLE:
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
• PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
DESIGNER:
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NRO4E WM
DATE: 01/09113
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12-108-C
SHEET 1 REV.
C3 z\
3 OF
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD & GREEN RIVER TRAIL CONDUIT EXTENSION
A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
BORE PATH CROSS SECTIONS
Y
0
z
O
0.
a
U
N
11
3
M
35
30
25
A
>r
,y•{•:t t'
1;9;1 •.s♦t.10u
t ltd
In
ao
35
Wt
T30
►
I1
• s__,
es=c-.-
WM
me-.
===►=,m-i=—.11-====a=
i
3k`7:
M'W ^
25
1:: a
MP'--
"1 335—
25
20
20
r
t.1a 11
f
30
79,-
•' :sF.
.-`,-g--__,—±4—
S
25
20
21
=
MEM30
20
IS
==19",o'
i
.P, ii:
ce [iiii lttt
5+,4C
15
25
15
ijii'e
_
.. 1N rHTt
IMMi
y
20
=
r"--11====
.
10
5'C
10
5
—L-o-°r?e
rims..
20
10
iiim..
.
ymr
c.•
s..,...-.
..
m
xi,
-_
—
-
t\
5
STA: 9+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 10+75
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
40
M
MEM—
'ODD
25
A
>r
,y•{•:t t'
1;9;1 •.s♦t.10u
t ltd
In
ao
35
Wt
►
I1
• s__,
es=c-.-
WM
me-.
===►=,m-i=—.11-====a=
_
M'W ^
1:: a
MP'--
"1 335—
25
20
20
r
t.1a 11
f
30
!!
21
_
_l7neaa
MEM30
20
15
==19",o'
i
.P, ii:
ce [iiii lttt
5+,4C
25
15
ijii'e
51 -.
.. 1N rHTt
IMMi
y
20
=
r"--11====
.
'TT ttt
10
5
rims..
20
10
iiim..
.
ymr
c.•
s..,...-.
..
m
xi,
-_
—
-
t\
It I
5
5
jttttttttt!
wi
e
10
10
5
—m"
imminou
tl"'iM_
e
5
30
M
1f YR
'ODD
25
3 i
>r
—
In
• s__,
es=c-.-
L
me-.
- ssai
-
MP'--
25
25
20
20
f
=
_
_l7neaa
20
15
==19",o'
—=
.P, ii:
ct..
5+,4C
15
51 -.
.. 1N rHTt
A&G8
y
10
r"--11====
.
10
5
rims..
10
=
10
®
m R67NARY1:HfA:WA f
m
xi,
-_
—
-
5
5
STA: 7+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 9+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
SHEET TITLE:
CROSS SECTIONS
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
z
U
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NR04E WM
DATE: 01/09/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12-108-C
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
SHEET 1 REV.
C4
4 OF 4
A
M
1f YR
'ODD
25
3.Q_,
25
—
In
carr.~
-
MP'--
20
f
20
51 -.
.. 1N rHTt
A&G8
NOi
.
10
5
.,r
10
m R67NARY1:HfA:WA f
xi,
-_
—
-
.....-
5
STA: 7+50
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 8+25
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
STA: 9+00
Horizontal Scale 1"=30'
Vertical Scale 1"=10'
SHEET TITLE:
CROSS SECTIONS
SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS
z
U
DESIGNER: J. BARR
ENGINEER: B. ALLEN
DRAWN: J. BARR
S23 T23NR04E WM
DATE: 01/09/13
REVISED:
PROJECT: 12-108
DWG NAME: 12-108-C
PHONE: (253) 299-8598
CONTACT: KEVIN KINDLE
SHEET 1 REV.
C4
4 OF 4
A