Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit PL13-003 - CONTOUR ENGINEERING - STRANDER BRIDGE CONDUIT CROSSING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
STRANDER BRIDGE CONDUIT CROSSING STRANDER BRIDGE OVER GREEN RIVER P L13-003 E 13-002 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW City 'Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E13-002 Applied: 01/18/2013 Issue Date: 01/13/2013 Status: APPROVED Applicant: CONTOUR ENGINEERING LLC Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: Placing a 4" conduit to the north side of the Strander Boulevard Bridge crossing over the Green River in the Tukwila Urban Center. Location is on public right-of-way and therefore does not have an address or parcel number. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: 0001 25/23/4 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under the option DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period. Jack P e, Resaible Official City okwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Datluf )4;0'w; Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNSOP-8/07 E13-002 Printed: 03-14-2013 March 14, 2013 To: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION Jeremy Haug, PE Contour Engineering 3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Kevin Nordstrom SEFNCO Communications 4610 Tacoma Avenue Sumner, WA 98390 Office of Attorney General PROJECT: FILE NUMBERS: ASSOCIATED FILES: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: Jim. Haggerton, Mayor Jack Pace, Director King County Assessor King County Transit: SEPA Official State Department of Ecology SEPA Division (checklist & site map attached previously attached with Notice of Application) Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing E13-002 PL 13-003 Jeremy Haug, PE of Contour Engineering, LLC for SEFNCO Communications SEPA DNS, Options DNS process On the Strander Avenue Bridge crossing over the Green River, Tukwila, WA This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Stacy MacGregor, who may be contacted at (206) 431-3670 for further information. The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). SM Page 1 of 1 03/14/2013 H:\PL13-003 Strander Bridge Crossing\SEPA NOD.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No: E13-002 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION Jim Haggerton, Mayor Jack Pace, Director The proposal is for extending a 4" steel conduit across the Green River. The conduit will be attached to the Strander Boulevard Bridge. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Strander Bridge Conduit Cross Applicant: Jeremy Haug, PE of Contour Engineering, LLC for SEFNCO Communications Location: The site is located on the Strander Avenue Bridge crossing over the Green River Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: The project is on public right of way; the adjacent properties are zoned TUC. The following information was considered as part of review of this application. 1. SEPA Checklist dated December, 2012. 2. Franchise Utility Permit application (copy). 3. Civil Plans sheet C1 & C2 prepared by Contour Engineering dated 1/15/13. NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, and Phone: (206) 433-7166. III. REVIEW PROCESS The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does not meet the exemptions listed under WAC 197-11-800 (23). This proposal involves utility -related installation and construction of communication lines on lands covered by water. IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL SM Page 1 of 4 03/12/2013 H:\PL13-003 Strander Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Comprehensively, this project involves placing fiber optic conduit over a fifteen mile length. Specifically, SEPA is required for the length of conduit over the Green River. This portion of the project will be above ground with conduit attached to the north side of the Strander Bridge crossing the Green River. V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1-5. Concur with checklist. 6. The construction will follow issuance of a SEPA determination and after obtaining all required permits from the City of Tukwila or other agencies. 7-11. Concur with checklist. 12. The site is within the shoreline of the Green River. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a -g. Concur with checklist. h. ESC measures as recommended in the KCSWM must be utilized. 2. Air: a -c. Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a(1-6). Concur with checklist. a(2-6) Concur with checklist. b. Concur with checklist. c -d. Surface water design and construction shall be per the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Tukwila. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. 4. Plants: a -d. Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: SM Page 2 of 4 03/12/2013 H:\PL13-003 Strander Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc a a -b. Yes — This area is part of the Pacific Flyway, a primary corridor for migratory bird species. Chinook Salmon, Steelhead Trout, and Bull Trout/Dolly Varden are all listed as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act and all three fish use the Green-Duwamish River system for rearing and migration. c -d. Concur with checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c. Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a(1-2). Concur with checklist. b(1). Concur with checklist. b(2-3). The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements. Construction activity is exempt from noise permitting requirements during daytime house (7am- lOpm). Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts associated with the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. The work occurs in the public right of way surrounded on all sides by property zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). Surrounding land uses include a city -owned park, hotel, commercial strip, and an events center. b -f. g. Concur with checklist. The Shoreline Master Program designation is Urban Conservancy. hi -1. Concur with checklist. 9. Housing: a -c. Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a -c. Concur with checklist. 11. Light and Glare: a -d. Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a. The Green River Trail passes under the east side of the bridge and follows the river to the north and south. b -c. Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -b. Concur with checklist. c. Applicant will comply with all local, state, and federal laws in the case that archaeological or paleontological artifacts are encountered. SM Page 3 of 4 03/12/2013 H:\PL13-003 Strander Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc 14. Transportation: a -g. Concur with checklist. 15. Public Services: a -b. Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a -b. Concur with checklist. VI. COMMENTS: On February 15, 2013 notice of application was posted on the site and mailed to property owners and tenants within 500 feet of the project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-335 was used. Clarifying questions were asked by Karen Walters of the Duwamish Tribe but no comments were received during the single integrated comment period and this DNS will be issued without a second comment period. VII. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued for this project. This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File No. E13-002, and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Prepared by: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Date: March 12, 200 SM Page 4 of 4 03/12/2013 H:\PL13-003 Strander Bridge Crossing\SEPA_SR.doc Stacy MacGregor From: Stacy MacGregor Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 1:46 PM To: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov; jeremy@contourpllc.com; knordstrom@sefnco.com; Christie.Most@kingcounty.gov Subject: SEPA DNS for Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing Attachments: 20130319 NOD & SR.pdf Determination of Non -Significance PROJECT: Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing FILE NUMBERS: E13-002 ASSOCIATED FILES: PL13-003 APPLICANT: Jeremy Haug, PE of Contour Engineering, LLC for SEFNCO Communications REQUEST: SEPA DNS, Options DNS process LOCATION: On the Strander Avenue Bridge crossing over the Green River, Tukwila, WA This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. Stacy MacGregor Assistant Planner I City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd I Tukwila, WA 98188 Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 8:30-3 ph: (206) 433-7166 1 fx: (206) 431-3665 stacy.macgregor@TukwilaWA.gov I www.TukwilaWA.gov 1 February 15, 2013 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Jeremy Haug PE Countour Engineering LLC 3309 — 56th Street NW, Ste 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 RE: Notice of Application For SEPA Determination, PL13-003, (E13-002) Strander Blvd bridge crossing over the Green River Dear Jeremy Haug: There is a fee due on your permit application in the amount of $240.00. $100.00 is the balance owing for the permit fee application and $140.00 is to cover fees associated with mailing the attached public notice. The number of required notices sent for your application was 140 which included property owners and tenants within 500 feet of your project site as well as interested parties and agencies with jurisdiction. The cost is based on the land use fee schedule adopted by Resolution Number 1779 covering Public Notice mailings required for your application. This fee covers the attached notice only. Additional fees may be assessed for future mailings or other review tasks per the fee schedule. The payment may be paid by cash, check or credit card. The city will accept credit card payments by phone. If paying by check please send the check made out to: City of Tukwila Attn: Teri 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 206 431 3670. Sincerely, Teri Svedahl Administrative Support Technician Cc; Stacy MacGregor MD Invoicing Public Mailings.doc Page 1 of 1 02/15/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 aaket P.Nrci 1 PrOjeCt Location City of Tukwila Notice of A' .ion for a SEPA Determination Strander Boulevard br, rossing over the Green River File #s: E13-002, PL13-003, PW12-108 r i Property Owner : City of Tukwila Project Applicant: Contour Enginering, LLC Tik D Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor, 206-433-7166 Project Description: This application is for extending 4" steel conduit on the Stmnder Boulevard bridge over the Green River. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environ- mental impacts and expects to issue a determination of non- significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11 -355 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the notice of application and likely threshold determi- nation so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. This proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures. Comments and Appeals: You may review the application and submit written comments on the project to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:00pm on (14 days) March 1 2013. You may request a copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. City of Tukwila Department of Public Works 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433-0179 Permit Number Franchise Utility Permit Application Name of Utility ABOVE NET JOB# WARE -MALL RATS S10236-1-0135 BRIDGE Street Address 3904 52nd St. Ct. City / State / Zip GIG HARBOR WA 98335 Applicant Name Tim Svoowicz Phone No: ZAYO GROUP/ABOVE NET 253-617-0256 tim.sypowicz@zayo.com Field Contact Person KFVIN NORDSTROM Phone No. (office, cellular, etc.) SEFNCO COMMUNICATIONS 253-470-2333 knordstromesefnco.com Application is hereby made by the above -referenced utility to the municipality of the City of Tukwila to perform work as noted below or as shown on attached drawing(s). As part of the work description, please indicate any lane closures which may be required and the desired time(s) for san:e. We will have 1 lane closure going over the entire length of the Strander bridge crossing of the green river. Traffic Control plans attached JOB# WARE -MALL RATS S10236-1-0135 BRIDGE This permit is valid for 90 calendar days from the date of approval as shown below. The applicant shall comply with all State and local laws or ordinances. The applicant shall save the City harmless from any and all damages which may accrue to any person or property because of this installation or the maintenance thereof. Work performed under this permit shall adhere to the following: 1. 24 hours prior to construction, the contractor shall notify Project Inspector, Dave Stuckle at 433-0179. 2. Prior to construction, all utilities in the vicinity shall be field located. NOTE: For City of Tukwila utility locates, call One -Call at 811 or 1-800-424-5555. 3. Detours within the public right-of-way shall be in accordance with the current edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A traffic control plan shall be submitted for prior approval when requested by the Project Inspector. 4. For work within a public street, no open cut is allowed unless specifically approved. 5. The utility contractor shall carry a minimum of $2,000,000 liability insurance (personal injury, property damage), and be licensed in the State of Washington to carry out this kind of work. City of Tukwila Approved by: Plan Revision Date: Title: Project Inspector Permit Extension Date: Date of Approval: oject Name: STRANDER BRIDGE CONDUIT CROSSING of Action: SEPA OPTIONAL DNS PROCESS ile Numbers: E13-002, PL13-003, PW12-108 Applicant: CONTOUR ENGINEERING, LLC lite Address: STRANDER BOULEVARD BRIDGE OVER THE GREEN RIVER MLA ea* of JuI> wita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: x Notice of Application For SEPA Determination Notice of Decision r Notice of Public Hearing Mailer's signature:7--) Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _14th day of _February_, 2013 Project Name: Strander BLVD bridge crossing over the Green River Project Number: PL13-003 Associated File Number (s): E13-002 Mailing requested by: StacyGre r Mailer's signature:7--) 7 ( fj Q W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of A ation for a SEPA Determination Strander Boulevard brk,p .,rossing over the Green River File #s: E13-002, PL13-003, PW 12-108 Property Owner : City of Tukwila Project Applicant: Contour Enginering, LLC Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor, 206-433-7166 Project Description: This application is for extending 4" steel conduit on the Strander Boulevard bridge over the Green River. Tukwila has reviewed the project for probable adverse environ- mental knpacts and expects to issue a detennination of non- significance (DNS). The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11 -355 is being used. There will be a single integrated comment period for the notice of application and likely threshold detenni- nation so this may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the project. This proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures. Comments and Appeals: You may review the application and submit written comments on the project to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpin on (14 days) March 1 2013. You may request a copy of any decision, detennination and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. Bob Walter M LAST NAME GRAND PRIX TUKWILA LLC GRAND PRIX TUKWILA LLC BC PARTNERS LLC BC PARTNERS LLC STRANDER ASSOCIATES LLC Chen POLICH FAMILY TRUST REALTY ASSOCIATES FUND VII REALTY ASSOCIATES FUND VII WALTON CWWA TUKWILA 1 LLC WALTON CWWA TUKWILA 1 LLC DESIMONE TRUST WVH Nelsen TUKWILA CITY OF TUKWILA CITY OF JACK IN THE BOX INC PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC BRCP RIVERVIEW PLAZA LLC TUKWILA CITY OF NWR REALTY L L C COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER ADDRESS 340 ROYAL POINCIANA WAY # 306 340 ROYAL POINCIANA WAY # 306 PO BOX 997 PO BOX 997 1650 S 244TH PL 512 STRANDER BLVD 415 BAKER BLVD # 200 1301 DOVE ST # 860 1301 DOVE ST # 860 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR 1201 3RD AVE STE 5010 16435 W VALLEY HWY 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 9330 BALBOA AVE PO BOX 90868 248 HOMER AVE 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 16000 CHRISTENSEN RD STE 101 16430 W VALLEY HWY 639 STRANDER BLVD 637 STRANDER BLVD 635 STRANDER BLVD 567 STRANDER BLVD 633 STRANDER BLVD 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 581 STRANDER BLVD 575 STRANDER BLVD CITY STATE PALM BEACH FL PALM BEACH FL SNOQUALMIE WA SNOQUALMIE WA DES MOINES WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA NEWPORT BEACH CA NEWPORT BEACH CA ST LOUIS MO ST LOUIS MO SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA SAN DIEGO CA BELLEVUE WA PALO ALTO CA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA ZIP 33480 33480 98065 98065 98198 98188 98188 92660 92660 63134 63134 98101 98188 98188 98188 92123 98009 94301 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 571 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 677 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 671 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 569 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 669 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 667 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 677 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 697 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 665 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 695 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 663 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 693 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 661 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 659 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 691 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 689 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 679 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 647 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 699 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 649 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 685 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 645 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 683 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 643 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 641 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 681 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 623 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 621 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 651 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 619 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 615 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 609 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 551 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 625 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER 607 STRANDER BLVD 605 STRANDER BLVD 631 STRANDER BLVD 601 STRANDER BLVD 603 STRANDER BLVD 530 STRANDER BLVD 16401 W VALLEY HWY 512 STRANDER BLVD 510 STRANDER BLVD 16400 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 640 STRANDER BLVD 16350 W VALLEY HWY 644 STRANDER BLVD 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 690 STRANDER BLVD 646 STRANDER BLVD 648 STRANDER BLVD 16201 W VALLEY HWY 652 STRANDER BLVD 16201 W VALLEY HWY 652 STRANDER BLVD 654 STRANDER BLVD 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 658 STRANDER BLVD 16300 CHRISTENSEN RD 660 STRANDER BLVD 662 STRANDER BLVD 664 STRANDER BLVD 666 STRANDER BLVD TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 98188 668 STRANDER BLVD 672 STRANDER BLVD 16201 W VALLEY HWY 674 STRANDER BLVD 680 STRANDER BLVD 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY 16201 W VALLEY HWY AGEN•/;` US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY WSDOT NW REGION DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WA FISHERIES & WILDLIFE DEPT OF ECOLOGY WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE KC DEV & ENVIRON SERVICES KC METRO TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL QWEST COMMUNICATIONS SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMCAST BP OLYMPIC PIPELINE VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT#125 CITY OF RENTON SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES MUCKLESHOOT Cultural Resources Program MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program MUCKLESHOOT Wildlife Program DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE SOUND TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN UP COALITION PEOPLE FOR PUGET SOUND Countour Engineering LLC DE RTMEN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NW REGIONAL OFFICE ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTING DIVISION SEPA INFO CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY DIV WATER DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS Laura Murphy Karen Walter Mike Middleton UNION STATION Jeremy Haug PE 4735 E MARGINAL WY S PO BOX 48343 PO BOX 330310, MS 240 PO 47015 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD 3190 160th AVE SE PO BOX 40117 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A 900 OAKSDALE AVE SW 201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-TR-0431 23315 66th AVE S PO BOX 34023 PO BOX 90868 23828 30th AVE S PO BOX 34019 12645 STONE AVE N 2319 LIND AVENUE SW PO BOX 69550 12606 1st AVE S PO BOX 68147 1055 5 GRADY WAY PO BOX 34018 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 4705 W MARGINAL WAY SW 401 S JACKSON STREET 1620 18TH AVE, Ste 100 911 WESTERN AVENUE, STE 580 3309 56th St NW, Suite 106 SEATTLE WA 98124 OLYMPIA WA 98504 SEATTLE WA 98133 OLYMPIA WA 98504 MILL CREEK WA 98012 BELLEVUE WA 98008 LACEY WA 98504 SEATTLE WA 98104 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98104 KENT WA 98032 SEATTLE WA 98124 BELLEVUE WA 98009 KENT WA 98032 SEATTLE WA 98124 SEATTLE WA 98133 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98168 SEATTLE WA 98168 SEATTLE WA 98168 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98124 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 SEATTLE WA 98106 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98122 SEATTLE WA 98104 Gig Harbor WA 98335 ENGINEE.RING•LLC SEPA CHECKLIST FOR STRANDER BRIDGE CONDUIT CROSSING CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON DECEMBER 2012 Prepared For: SEFNCO Communications Attn. Kevin Nordstrom 4610 Tacoma Ave Sumner, WA 98390 Prepared By: Jeremy F. Haug, P.E., Project Engineer Project # 12-115 RECE no 1 ,n13 c La Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing rinAgs Pdiik 4c r, Sou hoenter Mali es'ifi 1 Boeing tnngacresj Industrial Park I 0 a PROJECT SITE SW 16th St; SW 19th St Baker Blvd Sth St rid inkier Blvd Vicinity Map W 27th St t6 0 201a Microsoft Corporation 0 2012 Noklk Date: C. f Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist 12/04/2012 Applicant Name: SEFNCO Communications Street Address: City, State, Zip: Sumner, WA 98390 Telephone: (253) 299-8587 4610 Tacoma Ave DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 1 Cit, Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO — Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete H:Vand Use Applications in PDF SERA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 2 C. f Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-3 1 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 3 Ci f Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Enviromnental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 C. f Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 5 Cit, Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing 2. Name of Applicant: SEFNCO Communications 3. Date checklist prepared: 12.4.2012 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): As soon as all necessary permits are obtained, estimated Winter/Spring 2013 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Agency Comments Page 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Checklist, Public Works Permits 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed project will extend 4" steel conduit approximately 200 -ft across the Strander Blvd bridge of the Green River. Conduit will then extend beyond the ends of the bridge on both sides for the entire width of the shoreline jurisdictional area and beyond per the permitted construction plans. A vault will be placed on each conduit run extension beyond the ends of the bridge. All conduit will be ran on the north side of the bridge with conduit across the bridge being directly attached to the bridge structure with the remainder being installed via open trenching or boring. All work will be within the existing public right-of-way of Strander Blvd. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is in a portion of the NW quarter of Section 25, Township 23 N, Range 4 E. The bridge is approximately 400 -ft west of the intersection of Strander Blvd and West Valley Hwy (SR 181), which is 2,550 -ft south of exit 1 off of I-405 on West Valley Hwy. The center of the bridge is at 4T27'22.5" N, 122°14'44.5" W. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 2 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The bridge deck slopes from the center to both ends of the bridge at a slight grade. The area outside the bridge abutments on both sides, slope away from the bridge. The river banks below the bridge is at a steep slope. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The river bank has slopes approaching 1 H:1 V in some areas c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silt loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some minor grading will be involved beyond the bridge abutment on both sides for the open trenching installation sections of the conduit and vaults as it comes off the bridge. No filling is anticipated except for possible gravel as bedding material. H:\ and Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 3 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Like any construction project, there is always the possibility of erosion. However, given the limited earth disturbance needed for open trenching and that the bridge abutments separate the trenching areas from the river, there is very little chance of erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The only surfaces disturbed will be for the open trenching sections. These areas are currently vegetated and will remain as such after the project is complete. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Appropriate erosion control measures such as filter fabric fence and/or inlet protection will be utilized as and if needed 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. It's anticipated that this utility installation will produce average emissions from the needed construction equipment consistent with a project of this size. There will be no emissions generated from the project post -installation. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The project crosses a bridge that spans the Green River 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. A portion of the project is over the Green River along the north side of the Strander Blvd bridge with other portions within it's 200 -ft shoreline area along the north side of Strander Blvd in the right-of-way. See the attached Site Plan Exhibit. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 5 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The banks of the Green River contains a 100 -yr floodplain, however the proposed project is elevated above the river a roadway elevations so it is all outside the floodplain. See the attached Site Plan Exhibit. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No H:' and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The project will not effect or alter any existing drainage courses, systems or facilities. It's assumed all runoff from surrounding areas eventually flows to the Green River. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ✓ Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ✓ Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ Shrubs ✓ Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation along the open trench sections will need to be removed and/or altered. This vegetation will likely only include grasses and other mixed plants along the side of the road in the right-of-way. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds) other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The Green River is known to be used by chinook salmon, bull trout and bald eagle. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The entire Puget Sound region is in the Pacific Flyway migration route for waterfowl and other birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None II:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 9 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 10 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The project is along Strander Blvd which will is subject to periods of moderate vehicular traffic 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term construction noise will be experienced between the approximate hours of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. or as dictated by City code. The project will not create any long-term noise. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The entire project site is within public right-of-way. Adjacent properties consist of commercial, multifamily and City land. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No H:V.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 11 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. The Strander Blvd bridge over the Green River d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Project is within public right-of-way f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The project area is within the Tukwila Urban Center g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban -Open Space Environment H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 12 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The banks of the Green River have a Slope Classification of 3 which has a high landslide potential. The area off the shoulder of Strander Blvd, beyond both sides abutment, have a Slope Classification of 2 which has a moderate landslide potential. These two areas as with the entire area within the 200 -ft shoreline is considered an environmentally sensitive area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not Applicable j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not Applicable k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 13 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Not Applicable b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not Applicable b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc Page 14 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None, but the conduit will be installed on the bridge so that it is not visible to vehicular traffic. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not Applicable b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not Applicable d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 15 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Adjacent to the project, on the southwest side of the bridge, is the City's Bicentennial Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 16 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project is along Strander Blvd b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? This section of Strander Blvd is served by King County Metro Transit route 140 and 150. There is currently a transit stop approximately 125 -ft northeast of the end of the bridge. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not Applicable H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 17 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not Applicable g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No H:\Land Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20I 1.doc Page 18 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricityynatural gas(water�refuse service, telephone sanitary sewer, septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project is proposing extension of conduit for communication lines. No utilities will be needed for this project. H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 19 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not Applicable Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not Applicable 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not Applicable H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 20 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not Applicable 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Not Applicable Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not Applicable 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not Applicable H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 21 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not Applicable 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Not Applicable Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not Applicable 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not Applicable D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of penury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checldist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decisi Signature: Date Submitted: — I4 — 2-013 Secf,el, — Cone F•�A ef4^� LLG H:\t.and Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 22 To: City of Tukwila Cc: Client, file i-141ill'i-(©0 lik ENGINEERING •LLC TF ARSHETTAL Contour Engineering PLLC 3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106 Gig Harbor WA 98335 PH: (253)857-5454 FAX (253)857-5458 From: Jeremy Haug, P.E. Date: January 15th, 2013 Regarding: SEPA Checklist for Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing of Green River Project Number: 12-115 Accompanying this transmittal are the following documents: Date # Copies Description 1/14/13 5 SEPA Checklist (one is ORIGINAL signatures) 1/15/13 1 Complete Application Checklist 1/15/13 1 Copies of Civil Plans 22"x34" 1/15/13 1 Copies of Civil Plans 11"x17" 1/15/13 1 Copy of ,Ftethc1115t Ui-,L 4 Pet",it Affl,ca4-ivt 1/15/13 1 Vicinity Map Application Fee Check (SEPA + Mailing Label Generation) Dear City of Tukwila, Enclosed is the first SEPA Checklist submittal package for the proposed Conduit Crossing at Strander Blvd bridge for your review and approval. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you need any further information. Thank you, Jeremy Haug, P.E. Project Engineer COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: ✓ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). V 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 1 l " x 17". 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 7. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. /0 A 8. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. HALand Use Applications In PDRSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc RECEIVE() IAN 182013' DEVELOPMENT Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 9. Vicinity Map with site location. NA 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. V1 V 1 . Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". H:\Land Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l l.Doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning a@ukwilaWA.gov SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION Planner: FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA File Number: L C Application Complete Date: Application Incomplete Date: Project File Number: T L) B 6n3 Other File Numbers: p ‘Q _08 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. Strander Blvd bridge over the Green River LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). Not Applicable - all work done within public right-of-way DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Contour Engineering LLC - Jeremy Haug, P.E. Address: 3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106 Phone: (253) 857-5454 FAX: (253) 509-0044 E-mail: jeremy@contourpllc.com Signature: Date: 01/14/2013 H:Vand Use Applications In PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc RECEIVED 1JAN Iti 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Strander Bridge Conduit Crossing 'Southcenter Mall 0 ,j Boeing LongaaeaI Industrial Park ii a a PROJECT SITE 1 SW 16th St.:— - SW 19th St.. Baker Blvd E ED JAN 18 20131 _, I_;:VELOPMF—HT Minkler Blvd f Vicinity Map SW 2701 St © 201 'Mkxoaoft Corporation © 2012 Nokah STRANDER BRIDGE CONDUIT CROSSING A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON W GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 1 INCH = 20 FEET 3p, reT_ 3,., STA 330' V+70.0, 40. S. LT zi'e 1AULT i3, STA: 4 38.68 LT • ON PIPE WALL wet . \VA o \ \ \ \ \ \3 \ \ \\ ABUii\ \ 1 AA VA va 33 ``r ,BEGIN 8((10( A1T0C 1M STX 5.02.T ON VICINITY MAP ATTACH PER DETAIL',p0;4_."04, y, " T — — Op OQ —220(F 4• c0Noun-( - BRIDGE ABUTMENT NOT TO SCALE STA 6+03.0, 43.5' LT 1r 130' +AULT to ♦'a iu 0 LU 4' CONDUIT ATTACHED TO SIDE OF NUDGE SEE SHEET C2 FOR DETAILS , OPEN T OU4rG 34 ;71v290917,50 .3nwi ar -. - -31i®r r M6: '" ITTUMs =ate (z)2'CONOUI ® 4'0 P IPE'. . II EIOSf. 4' IX PIPE III, . F305T' (3) 6' OONDlf1f WI WESZ Wire a_ loik .semv, vs ter `76A,. IM, IIMS. ' 11I 1. \WL'• 19_I.viss SINNIMIlikSS SI, sad_-lusossvamaissm'L SURVEYOR'S NOTES \,, } ro n `.._.iJp ' 0 ... -. as rPO —4Tp`gO P • 9q . X24•, • KhH pOC - N.169725.63 E1.3 E.EV2915.61 w1b1 (4) eCONDU 33 34 E6IST. (4) 6' CONDUIT Guar3 r+' - aTP^ 'O•b Toe .. • • r.'",--„ -47P 1) THE MONUMENT CONTROL SHOWN FOR THIS SITE WAS ACCOMPUSHED BY FIELD TRAVERSE UTILIZING A TWO (2) SECOND THEODOLITE WITH INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING METER (TRIMBLE 5-3) AND REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) / STATIC GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS)(TRIMBLE R8). UNEAR AND ANGULAR CLOSURE OF THE TRAVERSES MEET THE STANDARDS OF WAC 332-130-090. 2) UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE. ONLY THOSE WHICH ARE VISIBLE OR HAVING VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF THEIR INSTALLATION ARE SHOWN HEREON. 3) THIS SURVEY REPRESENTS PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT CONDITIONS AS THEY EXISTED OCTOBER 8, 2012, THE DATE OF THIS FIELD SURVEY. 4) THIS IS NOTA BOUNDARY SURVEY. 5) OFFSET DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO PROPERTY LINES. 6) IT LS NOT THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY TO SHOW EASEMENTS OR RESERVATIONS WHICH MAY EFFECT THIS SITE. POTHOLING NOTE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AT ALL PROPOSED CONNECTION POINTS AND CROSSINGS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF VERTICAL AND/OR HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON PLANS, OR IF THERE APPEARS TO BEA CROSSING CONFLICT, CONTACT AND PROVIDE THE INFORMATION TO CONTOUR ENGINEERING LW IMMEDIATELY FOR POSSIBLE DESIGN CHANGES. CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG (800) 424-5555 rI S7u TNJ T. "4" 5:,-04, - / " GN GO \\\ \\I \ \ (`()094, \ 6 ' \' ay Y \\\ ` ;{ In Z 3) LLI LLI z W -J 1 1 U SURVEYOR CONTOUR ENGINEERING LLC SURVEYOR: STEVE WOODS PLS 3309 56TH ST. NW, STE 106 GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 BASIS OF BEARING WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID NORTH ZONE(4601) COORDINATES AS DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATION. NAD 83/ GEOID09(CONUS). VERTICAL DATUM BASE: WSDOT # GP17405.62: FOUND 'X" IN 3" BRASS DISC AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE ON 66TH AVE. SOUTH AND I405. ELEVATION 58.655 (NAVD 88) CORPSCON CONVERSION TO NGVD 29 IS 55.118 (-3.537) FILL SPECIFICATION FILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, OR SUBSTANCES WHICH ARE HAZARDOUS, DANGEROUS, TOXIC, OR WHICH OTHERWISE VIOLATE ANY STATE, FEDERAL OR LOCAL LAW ORDINANCE, CODE, REGULATION, RULE, ORDER, OR STANDARD. ONLY EARTH MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN FILLS. UTILITY NOTES EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS WAS OBTAINED FROM BEST AVAILABLE SOURCES AT THE TIME OF DESIGN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBILE FOR THE RELOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND CONFLICTING UTILITIES DEPICTED OR NOT DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS. TRENCH NOTES IF WORKERS ENTER ANY TRENCH OR OTHER EXCAVATION FOUR OR MORE FEET IN DEPTH THAT DOES NOT MEET THE OPEN PIT REQUIREMENTS OF WSDOT SECTION 2-09.3(3)8, IT SHALL BE SHORED AND CRIBBED. THE CONTRACTOR 15 ALONE RESPONSIBLE POR WORKER SAFETY, ALL TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WASHINGTON INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, CHAPTER 49.17 RCW. PHONE: (253) 299-8587 0 o 0 f Q 003 a O w Z Z W W/1 9' cr,Y r Q r w o U 0 DESIGNER: J. BARR ENGINEER: B. ALLEN DRAWN: J. BARR S25 T23N RO4EWM DATE: 01/15/13 REVISED: PROJECT: 12-115 DWG NAME: 12-115-C SHEET REV C1 J \ 1 OF2 Lis -002_ REVISION! DESCRIPTION I DATE I BY COMMUNITY 111 ENGINEERING • L L C CIVIL ENGINEERSn,SURVEYORS,A.AND PLANNERS 3309 56th Street NW, Suite 106 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 - Phone: 253-857-5454 — Fax: 253-509-0044 — info@contourpllc.com W 0 `Z cr O m LU Lry i gc z O PHONE: (253) 299-8587 o i Axa 0 DO0 O O a c4 2 1 Y 0 0 U 0 0 U O F— w Z W S0 (n V DESIGNER: J. BARR ENGINEER: B. ALLEN DRAWN: J. BARR S25 T23N RO4EWM DATE: 01/15/13 REVISED: PROJECT: 12-115 DWG NAME: 12-115-C STRANDER BRIDGE CONDUIT CROSSING A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 661-4• r T2 2m!o• /It0 • /409one Profile Edge of deck ZP /me kWh. I 216 I duC/s (Fu/ure) 6"0 got (Provide AYE sleeves /hru piers st' Mter s os perm shee/ 5-7) Profile //ne S-6•IS PVC POSED 4 FIBER CONDO -30 co* /2'-o• /one /one 4 -reset 5-7 X to. 3-6'1d genera/ (yaure)/o"* wofer par/sure ducts. . ftvide /iuerh only under felt conh-ocf Noir: See sheef s-7 /or uhh duct delofZe eroler /eve/ 6o4(Aug. /972) ZEdge ofo'eek Profile line /✓oshing/on series rod girders OW' deep) C .944. see shf S-6. future) 4-4'0 e, duce. Provide tnser/s dr hangers only under fhni confroct. le Aluminum roil Type SiryosAins/on role londard)' Cos/spocin9,10,7- y PROPOSED 4FIBER CONDUIT F--r fiing round ?7t 4/9' IUUUi1U 2!6' 2- *G /Y¢^chs 2-4'¢ o •Se9"oc. va Imo' • .1 roundCln' -:fiis c. ,;16 •s'rak Provide one 2.0 Pe if Condui/Wife 2-s6 I I ise /9"o.c.':, 159 do eonouc%rs SC Wee. else "edger For sks4 rein,' Sete / s -a; a/s-s 's15 -s aI _2% 14-tse ea.. r /!/o" I = 2611^ r Note: Provide S -6"O PvC duds 4 4 beyond •eoch tend of be dge and cop of/ meed.. NOTE: CONDUITS WITHIN BRIDGE SIDEWALK WERE NOT CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN HERE, CONTRACTOR HAS FIELD VERIFIED THAT THEY D0 NOT EKIST. 2!/" I6-'T5C/a•ac•4!2" 2=1'4 4 neva girder Woshingfon Series /co girders 0 dE4• o.c. STRANDER BOULEVARD BRIDGE SECTION NOT TO SCALE PWMIIII SIB NOIR. -4,...,1. OONen=amp wow J WmfoncEoowymai M1r aieioaEorTm.•wwova• NOM 1,11166 CL.ANNOE IScoo Mr®1 NORm01RALPIMRR MINT ^"r NLWdBt o :