The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit PL13-0052 - STOCK BRUCE - PSF MECHANICAL CONDITIONAL USEPSF MECHANICAL 11621 EAST MARGINAL WY S PL13-0052 L13-0051 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TUKWILA HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Applicant: File Number: Application: Owner: Location: SEPA Determination: Comprehensive Plan/ Zoning Designation: Recommendation: Public Hearing: Exhibits: PSF Mechanical by Bruce Stock, Stock & Associates L13-051 (Conditional Use Permit) FE0 1,9 214 jt_ "--',ri'►� tdT The application is for an office use exceeding 20,000 square feet within the Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial zone (MIC/L). PSF Mechanical 11621 East Marginal Way South, Tukwila, WA 98168 Exempt Manufacturing industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L) Department of Community Development recommends approval. The Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the application on February 11, 2014, at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA. The following exhibits were entered into the record: 1. Department's staff report with Attachments A -D Attachment A: Aerial photo of site Attachment B: CUP application with site plan, elevations and landscape plan Attachment C: Applicant response to CUP criteria Attachment D: Comments from Valley View Sewer District 2. Full-size plan set Introduction The applicant, PSF Mechanical, seeks a Conditional Use Permit. A hearing on the application was held by the Hearing Examiner on February 11, 2014, at the Department Hearing Examiner Decision L13-051 PSF Mechanical CUP Page 2 of 4 of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. Represented at the hearing were: the Department, by Max Baker, Planning Intern, and Minnie Dhaliwal, Senior Planner; and the applicant, PSF Mechanical, by Bruce Stock and Ryan Harrison, Stock and Associates, and Jim Reynolds, PSF Mechanical. No members of the public offered testimony at the public hearing. The Hearing Examiner viewed the site on February 11, 2014. All references to TMC or Code refer to the Tukwila Municipal Code. After due consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, the following shall constitute the findings of fact, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner on this application. Findings of Fact 1. The site is addressed as 11621 East Marginal Way South, in Tukwila. The site is developed with a structure that was formerly used as office space by Unisys Corporation. Unisys moved its operations from this building in 2010. The existing building has 37,485 square feet of building space. 2. The property is zoned Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L) and the City's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC). 3. The property is located within the Gateway North industrial park. Surrounding development includes two multi -tenant buildings to the west, the Link Light Rail line and E. Marginal Way S to the east, SR 599 to the south, and a multi -tenant office building to the north across S. 116th Street. 4. The applicant, PSF Mechanical, proposes to add a second floor within the existing building shell, and to use all space within the building as office. The project includes addition of an entry alcove on the east facade, and a balcony on the west facade as well as other interior improvements. Portions of the existing parking lot would be restriped to add parking stalls; a total of 126 parking stalls would be provided. No changes are proposed to the existing landscaping or the access points located on S. 116th Street. 5. Because the proposed office use would exceed 20,000 square feet within the MIC/L zone, the proposed use requires conditional use approval. 6. The Valley View Sewer District has submitted a comment letter advising that the District must be contacted for a side sewer permit if sewer work outside the building footprint is required. 7. The City's Public Works Department will determine the amount of transportation impact fees which will be assessed on the project, based on the number of new PM peak Hearing Examiner Decision L13-051PSF Mechanical CUP Page 3 of 4 hour trips generated by the project. The fees will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. The Department has reviewed the proposal and recommends approval without conditions. 9. No public comments were submitted to the Department or the Hearing Examiner on this application. Conclusions 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this application pursuant to TMC 18.104.010.3, which provides that a decision on a conditional use permit application is a quasi-judicial decision by the Hearing Examiner. TMC 18.64.050 sets forth criteria for a conditional use permit. 2. The first criterion is that the use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use is for commercial office space exceeding 20,000 square feet within the existing building, with interior modifications to the building, but no substantial modifications to the exterior of the building or the site. The site has previously been used for office space exceeding 20,000 square feet. The use would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to other properties or improvements in the vicinity of the site. 3. The next criterion is that the proposed use meets or exceeds the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district. The proposed use requires 124 parking stalls, and 126 stalls will be provided. Existing yards and landscaping are to be maintained. The proposal would meet this criterion. 4. The proposed office space would be compatible with the surrounding land uses, which include office use, as well as manufacturing and warehouse. Traffic impact fees will be required to address the vehicle trips created by additional office space use. No other impacts on surrounding land uses would appear likely to result from the proposal. 5. The proposed development would be consistent with the goals and policies of Comprehensive Plan, including Goal 11.1.15. The proposed use, office, is contemplated by the Plan within the MIC area, and office uses are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry. 6. The project would have no adverse impacts on the surrounding area. The proposal primarily involves redevelopment within the interior of the existing building, with only minimal changes to the building's exterior and to the site. All development at the site, including signage, will be required to comply with applicable City codes. This criterion is therefore met. Hearing Examiner Decision L13-051 PSF Mechanical CUP Page 4 of 4 Decision The application of PSF Mechanical for a Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved. Entered this 18th day of February, 2014. Anne Watanabe Hearing Examiner Note: Per TMC 18.64.060, a conditional use permit shall automatically expire one year after a Notice of Decision approving the permit is issued unless a building permit conforming to the plans for which the Conditional Use Permit was granted is obtained within that time period. A conditional use permit shall automatically expire, unless substantial construction of the proposed development is completed within two years from the date of a Notice of Decision approving the permit is issued. Concerning Further Review TMC 18.108.030 provides that "The decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be final and shall be appealable only to Superior Court pursuant to RCW 36.70C." BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF SEATTLE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that on this date I sent true and correct copies of the attached FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION to each person listed below, or on the attached mailing list, in the matter of PSF MECHANICAL, Hearing Examiner File L 13-051(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT), in the manner indicated. Party Method of Service Max Baker ❑ U.S. First Class Mail, postage prepaid Planning Intern ❑ Inter -office Mail City of Tukwila ' E-mail Max.baker@tukwilawa.gov ❑ Fax ❑ Hand Delivery ❑ Legal Messenger Minnie Dhaliwal ❑ U.S. First Class Mail, postage prepaid Senior Planner ❑ Inter -office Mail City of Tukwila ►1 E-mail Minnie.dhaliwal@tukwilawa.gov E Fax ❑ Hand Delivery ❑ Legal Messenger Dated: February 18, 2014 4101 da Vee Legal Assistant BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF SEATTLE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that on this date I sent true and correct copies of the attached ORIGINAL RECORD to each person listed below, or on the attached mailing list, in the matter of PSF MECHANICAL, Hearing Examiner File L13-051(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT), in the manner indicated. Party Method of Service Max Baker,Planning Intern City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 // U.S. First Class Mail, postage prepaid ❑ Inter -office Mail ❑ E-mail ❑ Fax ❑ Hand Delivery ❑ Legal Messenger Dated: February 18, 2014 nda Vee Legal Assistant City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director February 21, 2014 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Bruce Stock, Stock and Associates, Applicant James P Reynolds, PSF Mechanical, Owner King County Assessor This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L13-051 Applicant: PSF Mechanical by Bruce Stock, Stock and Associates Type of Permit Applied for: Conditional Use Permit Project Description: Application is for an office use exceeding 20,000 square feet within the Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial zone (MIC/L) Location: 11621 East Marginal Way South, Tukwila, WA 98168 Associated Files: None Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Hearing Examiner has determined that the application for a conditional use permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Application is a Type 3 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 No administrative appeal of the Decision is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the Hearing Examiner's decision may file an appeal in King County Superior Court. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner's Decision must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Max Baker, who may be contacted at 206-431-3662 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Max Baker Department of Community Development City of Tukwila February 21, 2014 HEARING DATE: APPLICANT: OWNER: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: REQUEST: LOCATION: ASSOCIATED PERMITS: SEPA DETERMINATION: City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PREPARED February 4th, 2013 February 11th, 2014 Bruce Stock, Stock and Associates PSF Mechanical A9 C17A1O :H Notice of Application was mailed to surrounding property owners and tenants and posted at the site on January 21st, 2014. Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to surrounding property owners and tenants on January 2151, 2014. A copy of the Notice of Public Hearing was also posted on site. L13-051 (Conditional Use Permit) Conditional Use Permit to renovate the existing building and add a second floor within the existing shell to use as an office building within the Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light zone. 11621 East Marginal Way S., Tukwila, WA, 98168 None. Exempt Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L) Max Baker, Planning Intern (206) 431-3662 max.baker@TukwilaWA.gov A. Aerial Photo of Site B. Conditional Use Permit Application with site plan, elevations and landscape plan C. Applicant Response to Criteria for Conditional Uses D. Comments from Valley View Sewer District BACKGROUND On December 22, 2013, the City of Tukwila received a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application from PSF Mechanical at 11621 East Marginal Way S., Tukwila, WA 98188. The PSF Mechanical building that is subject to this application was built in 1995 and renovated in 2006. The building formerly housed offices for the Unisys Corporation, a global information technology company based in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, that provides a portfolio of IT services, software, and technology. A "Check Processing" department was originally located at the address. In 2007, Unisys combined a "Service and Repair of PCs" department from 200 Andover Pk. E., #9, with their Check Processing service at the 11621 East Marginal Way location. In 2010 Unisys was no longer located within the building and contact addresses were changed to their Blue Bell, Pennsylvania headquarters. The property is located within the Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L) zone. PSF Mechanical is now requesting to expand upon the existing 37,485 square feet of building space through the addition of a second floor within the existing shell of the structure. This would include the conversion of all current and additional building space into office. Physical changes to the exterior of the building to accommodate this new use and provide necessary access are proposed. Additional parking stalls within the existing parking lot will be created to provide for employees and visitors. Manufacturing Industrial Center Tukwila's Manufacturing/Industrial Center is an important regional center of industrial activity. It is one of four such centers designated in King County. The Manufacturing /Industrial Center (MIC) is an area that is meant to preserve and enhance manufacturing and industrial activity, and the land that allows these activities to operate. King County's Countywide Planning Policies set parameters for the employment and uses that may occur within an MIC. City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan policies establish that the Manufacturing Industrial Center is intended for industrial activity in order to "maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the region, while minimizing the impacts on residential neighborhoods." The Zoning Code, which implements the Comprehensive Plan's policies, limits non -industrial uses, especially office and retail, which may occur in the MIC, and reserves the land for industrial activities and some limited support for these uses. The City divides the MIC area into two zoning categories, Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H) and Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light (MIC/L). The MIC/H zoning classification allows for heavier industrial uses than what is permitted within the MIC/L zones. However, both zones limit uses that are not compatible with manufacturing and industrial uses. To achieve the City's goal of preserving the MIC zone for manufacturing type of uses, several non -compatible uses such as residential are prohibited while other uses, such as the proposed office use, is required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). FINDINGS VICINITY/SITE INFORMATION Project Description The applicant is requesting that the Hearing Examiner approve a conditional use permit to: • Renovate an existing office building, with the addition of a second floor within the existing shell. Page 2 of 5 • Addition of an entry alcove on the east facade and a balcony on the west facade. • Addition of insulated glazing in the existing west wall. • Work is to include doors, walls, finishes, elevator, stairs, structural framing and exterior glazing. Existing Development The subject property is located at 11621 E Marginal Way S., Tukwila, WA, 98168 and according to the official zoning the property lies in the Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L) zone. The site currently contains a single floor office/manufacturing building. Surrounding Land Uses The building is located within the Gateway North industrial park. To the west are to two similar multi -tenant buildings within the park (these buildings do not use the parking on the subject property). To the east is the Link Light Rail line and E Marginal Way S. To the north, across S 116th St., is a multi -tenant office building. To the south is State Route (SR) 599. Topography The site is primarily flat. Vegetation The site has existing landscaping that will not be altered as a result of this project. Access Two vehicular access points are located off S 116th St. These access points will not be altered as a result of this project. (Attachment B, Site Plan). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DECISION CRITERIA The applicant is requesting to convert existing uses to additional office square footage in their existing building. As required by TMC, a conditional use permit, approved by the Hearing Examiner, is required. In the following discussion, the CUP review criteria are found in TMC Chapter: 18.64. 1) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use is for commercial office space (over 20,000 sq. ft.) within an existing building with existing site infrastructure and access. In the past the space has been used for commercial office space (over 20,000 sq. ft.). Additional usable office area to be added (partial second floor within existing envelope and outdoor balcony). Proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or other improvement in the vicinity. 2) The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy. building and no changes are proposed to the site infrastructure, access or landscaping. Portions of the existing parking lot will be restriped to accommodate parking requirements for proposed use and area (3 stalls per 1000 sq. Page 3 of 5 ft.) including parking stall size, quantity and access. A total of 126 stalls will be provided, exceeding the minimum of 124 stalls as required by the zoning code. 3) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. No new building is proposed and the existing building is part of the larger industrial complex. The buildings in the industrial complex are a combination of manufacturing, warehouse and office type of uses. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding land uses. Office space less than 20,000 sq. ft. is a use permitted outright. Proposed development will primarily occur within existing building on an existing developed site. Additional usable area (second floor) will be added inside the building and a balcony added to the exterior. Applicant is responsible to pay traffic impact fees prior to the issuance of the building permit. The City's Public Works Department shall determine the amount of transportation impact fee based on any new PM peak hour trips. The fee assessment will take into consideration the number of employees; business hours; work hours of employees; existing area used for offices. The proposed development shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan PSF Mechanical is a local mechanical contractor who manufactures and installs mechanical systems. The proposed office space is for their engineering, service and administrative groups to support their fabrication and installation operations, consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goal 11.1.15 — Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as office and laboratories, while limiting unrelated uses. 4) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. No adverse impacts to the surrounding area are anticipated as a result of the proposed use. The proposal will occur primarily within an existing building with no changes to existing infrastructure, site access or view from neighboring properties. Restriping of an existing paved area will provide additional parking to meet the current parking regulations for an office use. Any changes to the building signage shall comply with the City's Sign Code and minor exterior lighting revisions shall provide uniform lighting of site and additional security without off-site glare. COMMENTS Dana Dick, Valley View Sewer District Manager: Valley View will need to be contacted for a side sewer permit if sewer work exists outside the proposed building footprint. The district should also be contacted with existing and proposed fixture count information so connection charges can be accurately calculated and a King County capacity charge form completed correctly. No public comments have been submitted. CONCLUSIONS Permitting the addition of a second floor within an existing building shell and the creation of new entryways should have no impact on the surrounding area given that 1) the applicant will use an existing building and there will be no modifications to the site design and 2) the additional parking generated by the proposed use will be accommodated on the site and 3) the additional traffic generated by the proposed use will be subject to City Traffic Concurrency and Traffic Impact fees at the time of the building permit issuance. Page 4 of 5 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with no conditions. Expiration and Renewal of Conditional Use Permit Per TMC 18.64.060, a conditional use permit shall automatically expire one year after a Notice of Decision approving the permit is issued unless a building permit conforming to the plans for which the Conditional Use Permit was granted is obtained within that time period. A conditional use permit shall automatically expire unless substantial construction of the proposed development is completed within two years from the date of a Notice of Decision approving the permit is issued. Page 5 of 5 Attachment A Attachment A: Aerial Photo of Site ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHICS KrePONINATION GENERAL REQUIREMENTS DRAWING INDEX 0.01 STOCKkASSOCIATES Stook IL Mae., M. Ire Ware* %aft WA XI 203.40.004 11..00.. DETAIL Nye, DESCRIPTION OF WORK itt +..'.° PROJECT TEAM - amen ice^ .00 0004 Fe /440n1 Eatr _.r. w == Mut- CODE INFORMATION ET ... 4E. kr-t= ext.traSt .Una deastr, IMO K SON ce Nate ZAr meN Tell olialeweeke eLICGINCeree... Tee, eeNeNNe rert CNN LEGAL DESCRIPTION eNd RECEIVED DEC 24 2013 (,( /i4JA,/1,111 Y OF VLIClI'MENT BUILDING PERSPECTIVE FROM ENTRY nerreireNe . “.a • VICINITY MAP eNeeeee p Nan Same N. CCC w cc QIe- <. W g CCM JulesCO g luawg3e1tl OSTOCK ASS9 9ATes Stock & 10.1.111111. B.., M0 111121 Tc 4011/10.004 Lac 92.0.005 .n...reerMe.sse.ar.ee.o PARKING NOTES CO CC Ll:l IC Q 0 LalL LI J LY CD RECEIVE DEC 24 20 ..C(JMNtbAwu (l(• V ELOPME' eg LVI SITE PLAN cHcr�xcc er A0.2 D 3 El 4uawypeUV I11 1 1 0 0 nom ass l i. Num ins •a.i1 I■�IRil 111Trir1 111 OEAST BUILDING ELEVATION - SIGNAGE A 77114 ONORTH BUILDING ELEVATION -----{---+03 ---H rrn Fmm,� ■ 1 1 Ir 1 1 1 _1L1 OSOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION - SIGNAGE V OWEST BUILDING ELEVATION mmlmm mmmm_ Fl n s.P � SIGNASE NOTES sl."`" deo.. TOP OP AT "" 'Q., p nIONAINif 511.1 AT rm... 64-11t, MORTN.err6 ‘0,641.111CTED OP 1.6A STANI.J66 STEEL AND BK. 81[05 /60 OTArPt MaivALS PROM MITSTINS MU" 0, FACADE STAND-GrFe TO ALLON ran 6M-01.20411•16. DAMMAM?. P.M, BM ALC.T.TU.14120 MOW C.01.1•OneNTRY, CONOTINJLTI9 OUT OF 1.45A =TM/T.19M CONI•Nri 4060 61.0 De 1ST -114.40..000 ECFIVEn DEC 24 2013 I (^JI 11,1 14 ISTOCKA:ASS?CIATES O4eY• Pore*.. be. ra�NAM. FCC 20..1.0411N w..bab,i..em4aa n cc w cc 0 2 ca J CC 0 FJ S g ELEVATIONS nr:bAath, :wEt,ED PRG:„T N 1-0x901 A0.3 9 4UaW4DEW • 111910 APIEDULE ' NP ' ' ' . r44" 104.4014.4410 • 0444•41.4•0 OW AMP 21 1 OAL. ory$nonopon ANCOO. AZALEA wrgo,cattor / 01/19200094 ALAIAA 3021000CALLIII 511544 DOW 1 DATLET 130 21 15125.. 132/0 CAL. OM. 11.41600 501101 atilt' "Tr34,21, .0 ALSIP. 02100013P 01000 / wawa- runs 1-5/4. CAL. 001, MATD 1001 21-24. At CO , OOPL0211A 0000000.2011 / OePIAREA 3-71. AT- . eV5 1 MUM G. 'Olel2ENCLOJCN / RatERN2 Fl..1.11 133/4. CAL. 10219, PIATCWIED NOW leill , • =MA J•2110120201 / JA0.22110201 DMA I -5A4. CAL 540. F0TC2IED 1001 PR0219 LINATANICA / PORTLIOAL LAVA. 0 FLAMM* ACIORVOLIA 112.0000012N I LC•0004 PLANS NSW CAL 510, 21.02521012 ACIVI 21-1V IN. 1 TWA 1.1.2CATA 110220.6.4. I 00210.6.• CEDAR 5' WT. OM RILL 4 MEW 0 .1 *WAD MOM 1 AMMAN ME 541. DM RILL 23315521 - C6 • • ACME CAIONA1101 / AM Puna ONO TT!./ *TA0110101 &MC V A1T. V gr. 1530,11121-6051 1301.112.1142201 RECEIVED DEC 24.2013 15.4 • PL 122041111001 AND 1. REPAPt AREAS 040.1•32 031203/ 7J. e twee / 030AMPOCK A/C3 32/4 415200 5--b115 z'A 2,7 7"----771777 • pa 1 MB (ID LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE 1..20' 8rumbaugh & Associates. agAdftrIss Ma 111 prjallO (FOR REFERENCE ONLY - NOT TO SCALE) 4uatuipeuv AA 21 1 OAL. ory$nonopon ANCOO. AZALEA wrgo,cattor / 01/19200094 ALAIAA 3021000CALLIII 511544 DOW 1 DATLET 130 21 15125.. IT .112 PATINA iltA01902 I ~T25A21324. AT. PJ T1 P51554. 210311232•2 NOW /JANAN0222 MOROI EDA 21-24. At CO 0 OOPL0211A 0000000.2011 / OePIAREA 3-71. AT- . WI 1 122521. T. 11.0000:1111 / 952115.1515.15 12192501 2.22' APR AC PO 0 OA 12110000040603 nevoakere 22.112e / 10300000312FICA p1514255.. OTTO 1,2210DC / OTTO !MOON LALSEL 21443 63312 0-21' OM VL 01 PR0219 LINATANICA / PORTLIOAL LAVA. 21-24. gr. EA 23 902111445.414 VOIIPACIUSI WHINED pawn.* mote. COMO 21-1V IN. = 3001003.1425.I25WAND' / 31AA36 0.33 4' POT ME 0151951E52A FRA6A0001045/ 1404.04,14 5112.5T 4' POT 23 MOWER CONTROL 1410ROSEED RECEIVED DEC 24.2013 15.4 • PL 122041111001 AND 1. REPAPt AREAS 040.1•32 031203/ 7J. e twee / 030AMPOCK A/C3 32/4 415200 5--b115 z'A 2,7 7"----771777 • pa 1 MB (ID LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE 1..20' 8rumbaugh & Associates. agAdftrIss Ma 111 prjallO (FOR REFERENCE ONLY - NOT TO SCALE) 4uatuipeuv Attachment C :giammininnommanzah The review criteria for various types of projects are shown below. Please discuss development consistency with each criteria. Then, refer to the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan for project consistency with the policies. Please note that more than one category of policies may apply. Criteria for Conditional Uses (TMC 18.64.030) 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use is for commercial office space (over 20,000 sqft) within an existing building with existing site infrastructure and access. In the past the space has been used for commercial office space (over 20,000 sqft). Additional usable office area to be added (partial second floor within existing envelope and outdoor balcony). Proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or other improvements in the vicinity. 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy. The proposed use will be located within an existing structure with existing site infrastructure, access and landscaping. Portions of the existing parking lot will be restriped to accommodate parking arrangement meeting current regulations for proposed use and area including parking stall size, quantity and access. 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses. The proposed development is compatible with surrounding land uses (office space less than 20,000 sqft is a use permitted outright) and consistent with prior use (Unisys office space over 20,000 sgft). Proposed development will primarily occur within existing building on an existing developed site. Additional usable area (second floor) will be added inside the building and a balcony added to the exterior. 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. PSF Mechanical is a local mechanical contractor who manufactures and installs mechanical systems. The proposed office space is for their engineering, service and administrative groups to support their fabrication and installation operations, consistent with CLUPP goal 11.1.5 - Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while limiting unrelated uses. 5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. No adverse impacts to the surrounding area are anticipated as a result of the proposed use. The proposal will occur primarily within an existing building with no changes to existing infrastructure, site access or views from neighboring properties. Additional parking meeting current regulations to be provided at rear to support proposed use and area. Revisions to building signage per attached and minor exterior lighting revisions to provide uniform lighting of site and additional security without off-site glare. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Conditional Use Permit-Jan2011.docx Attachment D From: Dana Dick <danad@valvue.com> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:38 AM To: Max Baker Subject:file #L13-0051 Max: It doesn't look like there will be a requirement for sewer work outside the building footprint for this proposed project. If so, however, Valley View will have to be contacted for a side sewer permit. In any event the District should be contacted with fixture count information (both existing and proposed new) so connection charges can be accurately calculated and the King County capacity charge form filled out correctly. Dana Dick Manager Valley View Sewer District 206-242-3236 phone 206-242-1527 fax PUBLIC COMMENTS HOUSING & RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS COMMENTS* *not delivered during a public hearing or verbal public comment Date Via Name 4/11/13 Letter Wynn & Maxine Anderson 3/24/14 Letter Elaine Johanson 3/25/14 Letter Wynn & Maxine Anderson 5/1/15 Letter Bill Holstine 8/10/15 Email Mary Fertakis 8/16/15 Email Hyojin Whitford 8/23/15 Email Pat Malara 8/27/15 Email Barbara Ivanov 8/27/15 Email Rusty Trudeau 9/5/15 Letter Mary Johnson 9/5/15 Email Nancy Sparks 9/5/15 Email Joesph & Debra Hoskyn 9/6/15 Email No Name; torypet@comcast.net 9/6/15 Email Paul Hoberecht 9/6/15 Email Martha Elain Ayotte 9/7/15 Email Sean Russell 9/7/15 Email Robert Ferguson 9/7/15 Email Mary Wiles 9/7/15 Email Arlene Murphy 9/7/15 Email Jack & Vi Nyholm 9/7/15 Email Bill Holstine 9/7/15 Email Emily Willoughby 9/7/15 Email Liz Northrop 9/7/15 Email Doug & Cheri Hans, Robert Fogelman, Doug & Betty Kramer 9/7/15 Email Jim Arthur 9/7/15 Email Sharon Johannessen 9/8/15 Email Pat Larson 9/8/15 Email Robert Codd 9/8/15 Email Kim Buehler Mummert 9/8/15 Email Roger & Tricia Clark 9/8/15 Email David &Jennifer Traynor 9/8/15 Email Lois Traynor 9/8/15 Email Charles Trett 9/8/15 Email Gary & Diane LaPine 9/8/15 Email William John Crowley 9/8/15 Email Holly Adanti 9/8/15 Email Katherine Schwarzmann 9/8/15 Email Mr. & Mrs. Ray Ellison 9/8/15 Email Randy & Ramona Grove 9/8/15 Email Rosemary Akre 9/8/15 Email Parmalee Brouillard 9/8/15 Email Bynum & Diaz Family 9/8/15 Email Scott Matson 9/8/15 Email Jonathon Peterson 9/8/15 Email Erin Bristow 9/8/15 Email Joan Hernandez 9/8/15 Email April Chanes 9/8/15 Email Kim Pham 9/8/15 Email Paula Cabunoc 9/8/15 Email Sandi Mills 9/8/15 Email Mark & Cathy Ohlstrom 9/9/15 Email Kelly Diaz 9/9/15 Email David Puki 9/9/15 Email Romeo Diaz 9/10/15 Email Diane Kitano 9/10/15 Email Rusty Trudeau 9/10/15 Email Patricia Perry 9/11/15 Email Robert & Jan Esterly 9/11/15 Email Stephanie Nguyen 9/12/15 Email Sunny Mulholland 9/13/15 Email Hubert Crawley 9/14/15 Email Dave Larson 9/14/15 Email John Conwell 9/15/15 Email Stephanie Nguyen 9/17/15 Email Bill Holstine 9/18/15 Email Todd Smith 9/20/15 Email Peter & Gael Okicich 9/21/15 Letter Bill Holstine 9/22/15 Email No Name; snuffysmith888@comcast.net 9/24/15 Email Kathy Stetson 9/24/15 Email Hamdi Abdulle 9/28/15 Email Emily Willoughby 10/5/15 Email Dave Larson . wynn maxine anderson Google earth Google earth feet meters 6425 s 153rd st ELAINE JOHANSON 6425 S 153RD ST . ELAINE JOHANSON March 25, 2014 Jack Pace, Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila During review of the ComnrehensivP Plan, please review the single family home area. This past year a "Monster House" was built across from the Tukwila Park. It is not compatible with the existing family homes. Thought and review should be given to an area prior to issuing a permit for something like this. Please amend the Comprehensive Plan to protect the integrity of the single family neighborhood. Our area consists of one and two story homes. Height should be considered, restricted when necessary. What about other people's view? That should be considered. This "Monster House" blocks the view of the mountain and the valley from our neighbors. (Picture 1 attached) They have lived here 50 years. Obviously, no thought was given to this at that time. If a "Monster House" is allowed to be build on the property adjacent to our home, it will block our view of the valley and beautiful Mt. Rainier. (Picture 2 attached) Please help protect us, the existing family homes. Si71/1 ; . Wynn and Maxine Anderson 6415 So. 153rd Tukwila, Wa. 98188 RECEIVED MAR 2 5 2014 • CC MML.iNI i Y DEVELOPMENT PICTURE 1 ►E:IMf RECEIVED Decision Ar E ° Time RECEIVED MAY 012015 For Development Community Proposed Infill Housing Code Contents Page Title 1 Contents 2 Preface 3 Summary Of Problem 4 Solutions 5 Actions Required + Pro And Con 6 Conclusion 7 Addendum (4 pages) iNk.I.D TLAI8 1 cic vCa-e_S Page 1 Preface The Tukwila Tomorrow Committee concluded its charter thinking the infill of future new homes would be regulated by scale and architectural features which would establish blending into neighborhoods thereby preserving their neighborhood integrity, appearance, quality and tranquility while giving existing residents some assurance the city is looking after their ongoing interests. Somehow the committee's agreement with the city was never implemented and the unintended result is no one is looking out for Tukwila residents around, near and adjacent to infill home building. Among other adverse conditions we have the results which is mammoth homes, some three stories high in predominately one story home neighborhoods which is totally unacceptable and begs for swift action by city government. Sweeping this subject under the rug again some twenty years later would be to deny Tukwila residents their just due by their city government. Page 2 Summary Of Problem Developers/builders are given permits to develop building lots with very minimal requirements, except for proper placement of infrastructure: water, sewer, electrical, telephone, TV cable, dry wells and drainage, etc. and streets. They can unduly disturb neighbors and even damage neighbors' property with impunity with the city claiming that such damage is a civil matter between the damaged neighbor and the developer/builder/ contractor. Builders are permitted to construct what they wish with just a few building check points: footings, stem walls, set backs, anchors, fasteners, wiring, plumbing, cabling, venting, insulation etc. Windows are a ratio to floor space and placement thereof is an option at builders discretion (side, front and rear of buildings, etc.). The location of windows on the sides of houses is relatively new to home building and is detrimental to neighbors' privacy and should only be permitted when such privacy is not a concern. Care facilities are permitted without neighborhood notice or input. Such facilities have the ability to foist undesirable cliental on neighborhoods who may wander the streets and disrupt otherwise tranquil neighborhoods and could pose a threat to neighborhood children depending on the facilities' cliental. Therefore, the Facility at 42nd Avenue South and South 160th Street appears to be grossly misplaced. New neighbors are welcome in our city and communities and their presence likely enhance the neighborhoods and the city's residential footprint and revenue which is a plus and their permanence overall enhances our city, schools and businesses. The challenge is to find a solution where everybody wins and neighborhood tranquility prevails. Page 3 Solutions 1. Establish a 'Good Neighbor Policy' via the permitting process stating: Contractors/Builders will honor Tukwila's Good Neighbor's Policy and leave developed property in as good a condition as they found it, including its perimeter and associated walls and fences. 2. Adopt an additional building code for single story home neighborhoods: Add a 25 foot height limit code (grade to ridge) and increase the lot size to 7200 square feet, permitting a larger structure footprint to compensate for height reduction. 3. Deny side windows in structures in item 2 above. 4. Deny elevation enhancements in item 2 above ( no fill) 5. Mail notices and solicit community input for care facilities construction. 6. Amend existing structures height limit to specify 30 feet grade to ridge, not to roof midpoint. The adoption of these minimal impact solutions will mitigate some of the angst felt in neighborhoods where infill construction is currently a contentious issue and will likely remain so in such future construction. Page 4 Actions Required+Pro And Con 1. Establish a good neighbor policy Pro -can be accomplished without significant cost and mitigate neighborhood angst in infill construction communities. Con -would require a caveat on all construction/building permits. 2. Adopt the proposed 25 foot grade to ridge building height and the 7500 square foot lot size building code, plus cap the other height code at 30 feet grade to ridge. Pro -would remove future three story home construction in one story home neighborhoods and cap max. building heights at 30 feet. Con -requires DCD to establish which height code applies at the outset of the permitting process for all new development/construction. 3. Restrict the use of side windows to promote neighborhood privacy. Pro -more good neighbor policy Con -maybe some builder angst 4. Restrict site elevation enhancement (disallow any addition fill). Pro -more good neighbor policy Con -maybe some builder angst 5. Add neighborhood notification for Care Facilities. Pro -lets neighbors have some say in neighborhood development. Con -postage cost 6. Stamp all residential construction permits with two story caveats. Pro -more good neighbor policy Con -maybe some builder angst Page 5 Conclusion The Tukwila Tomorrow Committee had the solution to the infill dilemma some years ago but failed to ensure that its idea was implemented by the City Of Tukwila. It is never too late to do the right thing but it's always indecisive to procrastinate when the solution is at hand. It is incumbent on the Council to be proactive and take a stand on this issue. Page 6 Addendum Four pages associated with the City Of Tukwila's Draft Comprehensive Plan, April 6, 1995, which corroborates the intent of the City's commitment to The Tukwila Tomorrow Committee's Plan and defines the parameters to guide infill residential housing development going forward as an embodiment of the Comprehensive Plan. Unfortunately, that plan was never totally implemented but it is never too late to correct a mistake or oversight and the adoption of the recommended Solutions contained within the main body of this package would help mitigate some of the community angst going forward with infill housing in our city. Page 7 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor In 1992, the Tukwila City Council created a 17 -member citizen's advisory committee to draft and recommend a Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the Growth Management Act for the City's deliberation and adoption. The Committee, entitled Tukwila Tomorrow, was comprised of residents and business people from five Vision Tukwila neighborhoods. The Committee completed work on May 12, 1994 and their product, the Draft Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, was forwarded to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission's initial meeting was July 28, 1994. The Planning Commission was then briefed on the elements of the Draft Comprehensive Plan by staff in a series of meetings prior to a public hearing on September 27, 1994. The public hearing resulted in testimony from more than 140 citizens and businesses for consideration and deliberation by the Planning Commission. In December, 1994 it was determined that the Urban Center element needed further review and the Tukwila City Council and Planning Commission requested that the Tukwila Tomorrow Committee prepare two alternatives in addition to the Committee's original Urban Center recommendation. In developing the alternatives the Committee considered its original center designation, recent strategies for financing regional infrastructure, the local flexibility provided by the amended Countywide Planning Policies, and the recommendation of Vision Tukwila. It became clear to the Committee that none of the three alternatives was a practical match for urban development of the Southcenter area, now or as envisioned to evolve in the next 20 years. As a result, a fourth alternative was developed. This preferred alternative has been designated as the Tukwila Urban Center and was offered by the Tukwila Tomorrow Committee as a guide for growth over the next 30-50 year period. The Planning Commission unanimously endorsed this Tukwila Urban Center concept and has included it as their recommendation in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan being forwarded to you by the Planning Commission reflects Countywide Policy changes made subsequent to Tukwila Tomorrow Committee's Draft, changes requested by Tukwila Tomorrow Committee members in Planning Commission workshop meetings, changes suggested by staff, results of the Planning Commission's deliberations on input from the public hearing and the Planning Commission's desire to not create unnecessary non -conforming land use situations or pocket zoning. In addition, the Planning Commission has made a concerted effort to respect Vision Tukwila and the Tukwila Tomorrow Committee's vision of the future while dealing with current conditions. Tukwila Tomorrow Committee members were sent copies of all Planning Commission minutes. They were invited to attend and participate in Planning Commission work sessions. It is our intention to have Planning Commission representatives at all Council work sessions on the Comprehensive Plan to answer any questions and to represent the Planning Commission as a group. We suggest the Council invite Tukwila Tomorrow Committee members to do the same. Phone: (206) 433-1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433-1833 Page 2 Although the Comprehensive Plan being presented to you does not always have unanimous agreement on all items, it does represent the Planning Commission's position as a group and is wholeheartedly endorsed by all members of the Planning Commission. The Comprehensive Plan being submitted to you is a "clean rewrite" reflecting the Tukwila Tomorrow Committee's draft as amended by the Planning Commission. This method was chosen for its clarity, simplicity, expeditious handling capability and reduced opportunities for controversy. Af\p,A1 Grant Neiss, Chairman Vern Meryhew Kathryn Stetson, Vice Chair Jack Flesher Jim Haggerton George Malina DRAFT TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Residential Neighborhoods RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS PURPOSE This component of the Comprehensive Plan establishes land use and development policies for Tukwila's residential neighborhoods. It will serve as the basis for zoning, and will play a key role in the establishment of development standards, design guidelines, and display of public capital improvement projects. These goals and policies propose land use patterns and physical development policies that protect and enhance the sense of community in Tukwila's residential neighborhoods. They give the highest priority to achieving the image of neighborhood quality described in the Tukwila Tomorrow Committee goals and strategies, while satisfying regional commitments and providing emergency services. ISSUES Tukwila's residential neighborhoods are relatively fully developed. This development is a mix of dense, small-town residential areas and newer suburban areas. Its citizens are relatively active in ad-hoc neighborhood groups concerned about neighborhood quality. These residential neighborhoods are distinct geographic areas within an urban setting that is becoming increasingly crowded, with all the challenges of urban living. A strong sense of community is the key to maintaining neighborhood quality as Tukwila grows. Without it, Tukwila's residential neighborhoods will lose many of their most valued features and the public investment will not achieve its goals. Public and private development design can enhance or inhibit this sense of community. Standards to which public facilities such as schools, parks, and streets are designed should be modified to better support neighborhood quality, in addition to filling their specific roles. Additional minor improvements are needed to weld the community's facilities into a contiguous, recognizable system, with anticipated system -wide benefits far exceeding the relatively small improvement costs. Amendments to private development regulations are needed to better support communication among neighbors, increase housing design options, and ensure that housing size is consistent with smaller lot sizes as infill continues throughout the City. April 6, 1995 77 DRAFT TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Residential Neighborhoods Goal 7.2 Overall Land Use Pattern A land use pattern that encourages a strong sense of community by grouping compatible and mutually supportive uses and separating incompatible uses. Policy 7.2.1 Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single- and multi family neighborhoods; clearly reflects property development potential; eliminates incompatible land uses; and clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY + Clear definition of Land Use Map zoning codes Goal 7.3 Streetscape Development Streetscapes that enhance neighborhood quality and a strong sense of community. Policies 7.3.1 Provide pedestrian and other nonmotorized travel facilities, giving priority to sidewalk improvements that connect public parks, the river, open spaces, and neighborhood gathering spots such as schools and libraries. 7.3.2 Emphasize a network of residential local access through - streets, minimizing cul-de-sacs. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES + A street network that serves growth + Acquisition of needed right-of-way through a road utility district and impact mitigation 7.3.3 Provide standards and guidelines that create front yards, structures, and public areas that encourage conversation among neighbors (as illustrated in Fig. R -F). April 6, 1995 79 Three story new home construction in a one story home neighborhood is grossly misplaced and in effect invades residential privacy for which screening to reestablish such privacy is virtually impossible without drastically altering the landscape by the planting of tall shrubbery and trees. Three story home construction does not therefore belong in one story home neighborhoods and must not be allowed. Note: Absent tall trees and due to natural landscape. a large percentage of Tukwila homes would be view property. This damaged fence is clear testimony that a Good Neighbor Policy should be imposed on contractors and builders as an integral part of the permitting process. The top bar on the fence is bent/broken and the fence is crooked and wanders. while the neighbor's fence was old but straight and erect before the developer entered the scene 'Strong fences make good neighbors." Emerson 888.228.2658 Local 206.767.2151 Fax 206.767.2157 AVIATION DRY BULK PETROLEUM PROPANE WORK TRUCKS Cargo Tank Repair & Fabrication Full Service Parts Department We Deliver! CSC Container Inspections & Repair Meter/Register Sales & Service State Certified Meter Prover Full Service Fleet Maintenance (Truck Tank & Equipment) Custom: Suction & Discharge Systems NBBI `R" Stamp Certified Welders Service Trucks Computerized Maintenance Record Keeping DOT Inspections Compliance Repairs WA State Certified Emissions Test & Repair Center Registered Importer Shop Hours: On Cali 24/7 Office Hours: Pacific Time 7am — 6pm WI?STERN CASCJDE PUR1EYOR OF CARGO MKS, CONTAINERS.j/rTRUCKS & EQUIPMENT S ILL'SJr August 23, 2015 Mr. Jim Haggerton, Mayor Councilmembers: Kate Kruller, Council President, Joe Duffle, Dennis Robertson, Allan Ekberg, Verna Seal, Kathy Hougardy, De'Sean Quinn Re: Malara Properties, LLC / Western Cascade Property, 12065 44th Pl. South, Tukwila, WA 98178 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, As I own an almost three acre property in Allentown, I am disappointed in the lack of outreach and opportunity to comment on the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update. My property is currently home to a substantial manufacturing/fabrication operation with a LDR zoning designation. I would like to have the option in the future to move my business to a larger property and sale my property in Allentown. This means that I sell the property to another industrial user similar to my business, due to present zoning restrictions on my land, or sell it as single family use - nothing in between. I think all would agree that my current property use is not in keeping with the residential nature of the surrounding properties. I would propose that there are less intrusive uses more suited to our neighborhood and would like to list a few for consideration. 1. An assisted living facility for senior citizens would provide a much needed service, a more residential feel and an excellent buffer between the railroad operations and the larger neighborhood. 2. A cottage concept that would also provide needed senior housing, but to work, would require a much higher density than presently being proposed in the Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. A Single family lot zoning size that would allow a higher density than the current 6500 square foot. I.e. less than 6000 square feet as proposed would assist in accomplishing a higher density residential use. 4. Zoning that would allow use by museums, theatres, or the arts in general. I.e. glass blowing, metal arts, etc. In summary, I would propose an alternate use for my property that would afford a higher density use in exchange for the elimination of a non -conforming industrial use. In stating this it is also important that my current use stay in place until such time I can formulate a plan to sell and relocate the business that has resided in Tukwila, its home for 28 years. It is very important to gain as much value from this property as possible in order to relocate the business to another commercial property. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Pat Malara 12065 44th Place South • Tukwila, WA • 98178 • www,westemc ascade.com • sales@westemcascade.com Comments to Tukwila City Council Monday, August 10, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Review — Housing 1. From the City of Tukwila Strategic Plan — Demographic and Economic Profile (2012): • 57% of housing is renter -occupied — which creates a built-in mobility factor. • "The % of residents who moved in the previous year is significantly higher in Tukwila than King County." 2. Housing/Mobility Impacts the Tukwila School District a. Mobility in 2014-15 School Year • 858 students entered and 607 withdrew (total = 1465). (There is no way for me to tell from the data if any students both entered and withdrew during the year.) • The district's average FTE enrollment over the 10 months was 2,946.59. • Every building had students that entered and withdrew every month in the 2014-15 school year. • Adding the 29.11% of students who entered to the 20.60% of students who withdrew = approximately 49.72% turnover/mobility. This is probably low because I used the full time equivalent number each month to get the average, not the headcount, which is higher. • Demographic study for upcoming district bond issue - our student population is going to continue to increase and one factor is the rising housing costs in Seattle. If costs continue to rise here, it will increase the school district's mobility numbers as more families are unable to stay. b. Impact of Mobility on Student Achievement • The city's housing situation — with a high percentage of renter -occupied options and a low percentage of options for larger and multi -generational families - contributes to the school district's mobility rate and negatively impacts student achievement. • The Rennie Center (Boston) report: Tracked the impact of mobility within districts, between districts in a region, and across state lines. (http://renniecenter.issuelab.org/research/listing/revolving door challenges and solution s to educating mobile students) • The data was so compelling about the negative impact on student achievement for children who have to move during the school year that the Massachusetts legislature passed a bill in 2012 that includes mobility as a factor in the state's school achievement index. • Personal testimony: One factor that never gets discussed in mobility is the impact on the children who do NOT move. My children lost many friends in each of their 13 years of attending school here — and they never had a chance to say "good-bye" or find out where they went. They were in school on Friday and gone on Monday. I cannot begin to describe the sense of loss this generated for them, or the frustration I experienced as a parent that I couldn't answer their question, "Where is my friend?" 3. Current City Housing • There is almost nothing to transition into from the traditional 1-2 bedroom apartments many of our families start out in as new arrivals to the United States. They want/need 3 and 4 -bedroom apartments and homes because of having multi- generational and larger families. This style of apartment is almost non-existent in Tukwila, and there is a lack of Section 8 housing this size also. • It's difficult to attract young professionals — including teachers — to live and participate in our Tukwila community because of the lack of appropriate, affordable housing for them. 4. "The City of Opportunity; The Community of Choice" • It's hard to build a sense of community as expressed in the City's motto if housing policies make it difficult for people to do more than pass through. • We can't say we're a "City of Opportunity" if families who would like to stay here don't have that CHOICE because of a lack of appropriate housing that is affordable for different income levels. • Reality check — we should not be talking about changes that are coming — they are already here. In the City's demographic study in 2012, 48% of residents spoke a language other than English at home — and this did not include data from recent immigrant groups such as Burmese, Nepali and Bhutanese — so the current number is likely over 50%. Our schools and neighborhoods already reflect the diversity that is a part of living in King County. The City Council's response to our reality should be: 1) To acknowledge it and support an innovative, progressive plan to address what is coming, and provide for who is currently here; 2) To pro -actively embrace our diversity and support the opportunities and choices we say we want people to have. Children don't get to pick the situation they're in, so it's up to the adults to make the changes and create the supports they need to overcome the significant adverse childhood experiences many of them are dealing with. Appropriate, affordable housing is an area where city policy -makers can use their authority to reverse the negative impact of Tukwila's current housing policies on our youth and their families. From: Nora Gierloff To: Laura Benjamin Subject: FW: public comment on comp plan FW: rezone lot size Date: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:17:02 AM From: Laurel Humphrey Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:12 AM To: Council Members; Nora Gierloff Subject: public comment on comp plan FW: rezone lot size From: ppinsic9090[mailto:ppinsic9090Photmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 10:09 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: rezone lot size hi im hyojin whitford who lives in 12217 46th ave s. tukwila. i strongly urge you to reduce lot size from 6500sqft to 6000sqft. beacause i want my property value back which was used be 4 lots. the city has been working on comprehensive plan including renew TIB, housing and neighborhood elements. now its the time to concern new lot size then upgrade the community value. thank you for reading my email & your time. best regards, hyojin whitford From: Laurel Humohrev To: Council Mem ers Cc: Nora Gierloff;,lack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: FW: Request to postpone adopting the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan until neighborhood residents are made aware of the proposed change to single -family -zoned areas. Date: Friday, August 28, 2015 9:46:49 AM From: Barbara Ivanov [mailto:barbaraivanov@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:53 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Request to postpone adopting the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan until neighborhood residents are made aware of the proposed change to single -family -zoned areas. August 27, 2015 Dear City of Tukwila Council Members: I recently heard that the proposed Comprehensive Plan update includes a change that would allow duplexes and triplexes to be built in land currently zoned single-family residential. If this is the case, I am writing to ask you to postpone voting to adopt the Plan until more city residents have had time to understand this proposal and provide input to it. It could have significant impacts to the character of local neighborhoods, demand on public services, and traffic. Although the Tukwila Reporter had a general story in this month's edition about the update, I don't believe that it made it clear that this specific change was underway. Until I heard about the proposal from my neighbor, I was unaware that such a significant change was part of the Plan. It would be helpful to have several well -advertised meetings on this issue to hear from residents and other interested parties before taking action. Thank you for considering my request. Best regards, Barbara Ivanov 14240 -57th Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 barbaraivanov(comcast.net From: Laurel Humphrey To: Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; ,Jack Pace Subject: public comment FW: Affordable Housing Date: Friday, August 28, 2015 9:46:24 AM Attachments: image002 pnq From: Rusty Trudeau [mailto:rustyt@badensports.com] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 6:57 PM To: CityCouncil; Kate Kruller; Joe Duffle; Dennis Robertson; Allan Ekberg; Verna Seal; Kathy Hougardy; De'Sean Quinn Subject: Affordable Housing Dear Council Members - I was recently informed that all but Mr. Robertson voted in favor of the new affordable housing issue. First off, thank you Dennis for truly understanding the ramifications of a • change in our zoning laws. I have lived in Tukwila for 56 years and have seen a lot of changes to our city. I'm currently living in my sixth house within the Tukwila city limits purchasing my first house in 1980 at the age of 24 years old. I must admit I regret not being more vocal with other issues in the past with the exception of speaking out at the council meeting a few years back over the elimination of ou.r neighborhood fire house and the dispute over the Bergstrom property development running a through street to Macadam road from 57th, years back. So here we go again. I'd like to hear from each of you in regard to what I'm missing. In my opinion, allowing more affordable housing in my neighborhood has absolutely no positive impact for me and my family. Anyone that truly cares about the value of their property will not be in favor of this. In addition, it's a fact that lower housing cost brings with it more rental properties which in turn is a prerequisite for more crime. Ultimately, I have only one vote and honestly don't know how much influence the Trudeau name has with the people of Tukwila. That being said, we may find out real soon. Thanks for reading this and again would like to hear feedback from those of you who are listening. Regards, Rusty Trudcau National Account Manager Baseball/Softball Baden Sports Inc rustyt@badensports.com 253-653-6579 CIP AT Mary L. Johns° 16025 46th Ave. S Tukwila, WA 98168-2712 _ AI 6 7-11 \A75 (c) Loc. A4 /V-/6/./- 45 kr/1111 a0.7`4 -r9:4--L- t,Oq E= a( 0 A) 4- 7n71 -(1 -10 imp o(p,ea,c fiLcr, 'r17 0 qkj /--y /116 Ce is) ,_>1,40(gili 0,) zis .53 os,e---.s _ (6'67 44 roe VII' 6457 y a,a4 re") .tLf(k4 (S ,(fs P -7461141W (•t'7 }/tkpLE- /I) 7 M m a, i -4-- / z/thg f4 -fir{ et)A4g4k6-104Aid a) ist//(4)6/19z r/FK-&- 6-1A-&( V-fiTeeJ 4.ccitty 4,s I, Voq .11--1fr4s- 4 7-07 I kft1) From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; jack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:25:40 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: <nancysprk@aol.com> Date: September 5, 2015 at 6:46:42 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comprehensive Land Use Plan It has been brought to my attention that Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan is exploring to allow lot sizes smaller than the current 6,500 SF for townhouses and duplexes in existing single family neighborhoods. I had NO idea this is happening, and I'm sure the majority of citizens in the City of Tukwila are unaware of this action as well. I'm wondering WHY I haven't been notified and WHY it isn't public information. Sounds shady to me! As a homeowner in Tukwila for over 40 years, I am AGAINST this possible zoning change. If you want to see the effects of what happens when single family residences turn into multi -family dwellings, drive down my street sometime and look at all the cars lined up along the street, many of them not moving for weeks at a time. Many of the residences house two or more families, which I believe is against some Tukwila Code. Furthermore, If you want to see the sloppy enforcement of Tukwila's Code for the number of derelict cars sitting in driveways and carports, then come drive down my street. Tukwila's current zoning code allows a resident to operate an auto rental company from his residence, also on my street, where he can have up to 10 cars from his fleet lined up along the residential street. This is UNACCEPTABLE! I'm off topic, but I'm attempting to show how Tukwila's single resident neighborhoods are becoming unprotected by these zoning codes that are being slipped through in the night for the advantage of investors and businesses. Again, I am AGAINST any part of rezoning lot sizes smaller than 6,500 SF in our single family neighborhoods. Put your energy in fixing the zoning codes that have loopholes that allow businesses and multifamilies into our single family neighborhoods instead. Nancy Sparks From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; jack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Lot Size and Multifamily Zoning Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:25:20 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: <j.hoskyn@comcast.net> Date: September 5, 2015 at 4:45:45 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Lot Size and Multifamily Zoning As 30 year Tukwila Home Owners, my wife and I are not in favor of reductions in the minimum lot size and do not wish to see our neighborhood rezoned to accommodate multi -family housing. The position of our council members on this matter will most definitely influence our vote. Joseph P. and Debra A. Hoskyn 16017 46th Ave S Tukwila, WA 98188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; Laura Beniamin; )ack Pace Subject: Fwd: Lot sizes Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:26:31 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: torypet <torypet@comcast.net> Date: September 6, 2015 at 4:16:29 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Lot sizes Reply -To: torypet <torypet@comcast.net> I have lived in this city for years, im open for new ideas and changes but changing to smaller lot sizes i am not... I live on the loop where most lots are huge... I do not want a bunch of duplexes and townhouses in this city although they do have there place. No on smaller lot sizes, no on townhouses in single family neighborhoods.. Sent from Samsung tablet From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; Jack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Comprehensive Plan Change Disapprove! Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:26:09 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Hoberecht <paulrhob@hotmail.com> Date: September 6, 2015 at 2:00:32 PM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comprehensive Plan Change Disapprove! I do not approve of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan change to allow Duplexes and/or townhouses is existing single family neighborhoods! There are way to many high density buildings in Tukwila already, do not ruin what is left of the neighborhoods! Paul Hoberecht From: Laurel Humohrev To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin; )ack Pace; Nora Gierloff Subject: Fwd: Comprehensive Plan Updates Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:28:14 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Elaine <ineayotte@comcast.net> Date: September 6, 2015 at 7:22:30 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comprehensive Plan Updates I have some concerns about the following. (From the plan in italics) Allow an attached accessory dwelling unit, a duplex, or a two -unit condominium/townhouse in single family zones on all lots that meet the minimum lot area when various appearance and performance criteria related to impacts on adjacent properties are satisfied. I cannot support multifamily dwellings in single family zones. Height, setbacks and congestion are a major concern. Single family homes should not be shadowed nor dwarfed by Targe condo/townhouse construction. Explore adopting smaller lot sizes, especially in neighborhoods where the historical lot pattern is smaller than the established 6.7 dwelling units per acre (6,500 square foot lots). I do not support smaller lot sizes. Consider flexible zoning standards to allow prevailing lot size to remain and smaller lot sizes to be allowed if desired. Establish parameters for design characteristics such as height, lot coverage, home design features, and setbacks. If desired by whom? I am concerned with height, lot coverage and proximity to existing dwellings, and setbacks. Identify specific publically-owned land for affordable housing development. Use any publically-owned land and stay out of single family home developments for multifamily construction. Martha Elaine Ayotte 16319 45 Place South Tukwila, WA 98188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; )ack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Residential zoning changes in the Comprehensive Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:28:50 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Sean Russell <sean.russell@outlook.com> Date: September 7, 2015 at 9:51:51 AM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Residential zoning changes in the Comprehensive Plan Hello City Council members, I'm a resident in a single-family neighborhood of Tukwila. I'm concerned about the way the proposed zoning changes for residential lots (the reduction in minimum lot size proposed in the Comprehensive Plan) have been introduced. As a resident who feels fairly well connected with news about the city, I'm disappointed that I haven't heard anything about these changes so as to understand their impact on the city and my own neighborhood. Clearly there is a reason the change is being proposed, and I would like the chance to understand what's behind it. Is there already information about this proposal available to the public? Could you point me to this information? Are the residents who are potentially impacted by this change aware of it and its repercussions? Do they understand, and approve of, what will change in the city and our neighborhoods as a result of the change? Thank you for considering my email input. I understand there is a council meeting shortly, but regretfully I won't be able to attend due to my family schedule. -Sean Russell From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Be jamin, Nora Gierloff; jack Pace Subject: Fwd: Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:36:20 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Robert Ferguson <fergusonrl@msn.com> Date: September 7, 2015 at 8:03:16 PM PDT To: <cilycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan •Council Members, I was handed a flyer that talked about the proposed comprehensive land use plan. I am against changing minimum lot size to 6500 SF and allowing townhouses and duplexes in existing single family zoning. I have lived in Tukwila for 38 years. I do not feel like densifying the city will improve the city but only put more money in some land owners and developers pockets. Please consider rejecting this plan. Robert Ferguson 13961 56th Ave. S. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; )ack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: multi family housing Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:36:42 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: <mwilesshow@aol.com> Date: September 7, 2015 at 8:44:12 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: multi family housing Dear Tukwila City Council, I spoke with Dennis Robertson a few days ago. I am very sorry to hear you have decided to "explore" smaller lot sizes and putting multi- family units in our neighborhoods with the "Comprehensive Land Use Plan"! Not only will this increase congestion, but it will drive our property values down. I do not want any multi family units anywhere near my home. The noise level with the present lot size is already too high. To make the lot sizes smaller would be intolerable. We do not want this, and want you to stop this action immediately. Thank you, Mary Wiles & Steve Bache Tukwila residents & home owners for over 17 years Mary Wiles From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: )ack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: meeting on Sept. 8 Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:29:58 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Arlene <gram-a@juno.com> Date: September 7, 2015 at 1:01:34 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Re: meeting on Sept. 8 Hello, • My name is Arlene Murphy. I am not able to attend your city council meeting tomorrow evening, so I am writing this e-mail in order to vote online. My vote is an emphatic NO on the proposed " plan" for the idea ( or implementation) of any sort of multi -family housing in Tukwila, and esp. in my own neighborhood. I think it is rediculous to even consider this horrible idea, and the council should not even be "exploring" such an idea. There are multiple reasons why this is a very bad idea. I hope they come to their senses very soon and throw out any ideas they have of carrying out their Comprehensive Land Use Plan for duplexes and townhouses (or other ideas ) In our single family neighborhoods. My vote will always be NO ! ! ! Arlene Murphy 4350 So. 156th st. Tukwila WA 98188 From: laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: land use Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:30:16 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Jack Nyholm <jackvinyholm@gmail.com> Date: September 7, 2015 at 2:01:09 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: land use Dear sirs Please do not make any changes in the land use plan that would allow smaller lot sizes and multifamily dwellings in single family neighborhoods. Don't even bother "exploring" the issue. Jack and Vi Nyholm From: Laurel Humphrey To: Mayor; Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; jack Pace Subject: Fwd: High Density Zoning/Residential Communities Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:29:39 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: "William C. Holstine" <bolstine123@comcast.net> Date: September 7, 2015 at 10:21:53 AM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: High Density Zoning/Residential Communities 7 September 2015 To: The Mayor and Council Members, City Of Tukwila Subject: Zoning Parameters and Affordable Housing A couple of months age I attended and spoke to the Planning Commission Committee's Public Meeting and I was struck by more speakers from outside the city who were advocating Affordable Housing for Tukwila than from within the city. Another lady from Tukwila and I spoke about general concerns associated therewith and I spoke about the issues contained in my Letter to Tukwila about the building codes for which I was and still am advocating change. In the Tukwila Tomorrow Committee (TTC) Plan, high density housing was relegated to Tukwila Hill, the hill due north of South Center. Accordingly, we, my wife and I and our neighbors do not want apartments and condos of any kind commingled with single family homes in our community and believe the Council will show good judgement and act accordingly. One of the guidelines of the TTC was to retain the absolute community footprints of single family residential housing and not to let other zoning ventures encroach on our cherished and beloved communities. We still hold the belief the TTC was spot on in its residential zoning and we are not willing to cede our single family home zoning to higher densities bringing multistory apartments/condos to our otherwise somewhat tranquil communities. Nor do we believe that any such proposals would result in mitigating the Affordable Housing Issue of rent affordability. Other attendant concerns are privacy invasions, more street/road traffic, fluctuating school populations, larger transient community populations, fluctuating revenues, higher crime and neighborhood stability/tranquility imbalances. Seattle as a Sanctuary City encourages the good, bad and ugly associated with immigrants which spills over into adjacent or nearby cities exacerbating their sociable programs designed specifically to serve as a safety net for immigrant and low income families. Hopefully our city is being adequately compensated, because the city of Seattle is so being. If not, we hope the City of Tukwila, in association with other cities, is raising the issue with Seattle. If not, you should. If our City is locked on greater residential densities within the City, then we would request that you look at the property/properties on both sides of Orilla Road from I-5 to the valley floor and even utilize high density residential zoning on the valley floor to meet the City's needs, even though any and all such proposals will not, we think, result in affordable housing because the rent would still be $1500 or more per month and still out of reach of most low income families. if indeed the high density issue is on going, there needs to be an open dialogue between the City and the residential communities because it needs to be addressed in an amicable way to the satisfaction of all parties. We encourage your undivided attention in this important matter and trust the Council will take appropriate action in the best interest of residential communities and honor TCT's wise density plan, embedded in the Comprehensive Plan, that has served us well for twenty years. Yours Truly, Bill and Billie Holstine From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; Jack Pace Subject: Fwd: Comment on Proposed change to Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:31:19 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: <emilya57@comcast.net> Date: September 7, 2015 at 4:42:59 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comment on Proposed change to Comprehensive Land Use Plan City Council Members September 7, 2015 City of Tukwila Unfortunately I have a recurring meeting on Tuesdays which means I am unable to attend the Tukwila City Council meeting on Tuesday September 8, 2015 at 7:OOPM. However, I do care about the significant zoning change which is being proposed to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. I especially do not want duplexes and townhouses to be allowed in existing single family neighborhoods. I live in a single family neighborhood and I know that there are already many aberrations to compliance with the existing zoning codes. I do not want more multi -family housing units in my, or any, single family zoned area. I must say, I was quite surprised to find that the Council was so close to finalizing this proposed change without a significant notice to the population of the impacted areas of Tukwila. I am sure; at least I hope, that there was the required legal notification. But obviously, for something of such importance, I would think that the City Council would make quite sure that the impacted or potentially impacted folks would know about this proposed change. This is much too repetitious of my first run in with Tukwila's proposed changes (30 years ago). Since you can, and apparently plan to, pass a new Comprehensive Plan on September 21, 2015, which would include these changes, then apparently all that would be required before such changes went into effect would be implementation in the Zoning Code. There does not appear to be a time/place for those of us who are opposed to this change to make our opposition to the plan known. Since I know of no other method to make my opposition to this plan known, I am sending this letter. I am opposed to the proposed changes which would permit duplexes and townhouses in existing single family neighborhoods and I am also opposed to smaller lot sizes as well. Emily Willoughby 17000 53rd Ave S Tukwila, WA 98188-3250 206-241-5885 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin; ,Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff Subject: Fwd: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:39:30 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Liz Northrop <liznorthrop@comcast.net> Date: September 7, 2015 at 7:36:58 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Cc: jim arthur <djarthurl@comcast.net> Subject: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Dennis, thank you for informing us of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Tukwila. I am firmly OPPOSED to having smaller lot sizes than the current 6500 SF. I am firmly OPPOSED to have any type of multi -family housing in my neighborhood. One of the charms of our area is the single family homes. Don't spoil our neighborhood by putting in smaller lots. Don't spoil our neighborhood by putting in multi -family housing. We do NOT WANT duplexes, townhouses, or tiny lots next year — or any year! Thank you for opposing this! Thank you, Liz Northrop 16444 53rd PI So Tukwila, 98188 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Laurel Humphrey Council Members Nora Gierloff; )ack Pace; Laura Benjamin Fwd: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO EXPLORE TUKWILA ZONING Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:32:00 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: "Cheri M. Hans" <cmhans@uw.edu> Date: September 7, 2015 at 4:44:25 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO EXPLORE TUKWILA ZONING Attn: Tukwila City Council Members, It has come to our attention that the city of Tukwila is "exploring" single-family neighborhoods for possible multi -use zoning changes. The following neighborhood residents adamantly oppose this "exploration" & consideration of the Comprehensive Plan to build duplexes & townhouses in this area. We have chosen our areas because of the neighborhoods. If we wanted that type of housing, we would have chosen those areas to begin with. Since we are unable to attend the Council Meeting being held at City Hall on Tues, Sept 8th, 2015 at 7:00 pm; we are letting you know of our opposition to having our neighborhood "explored." We would appreciate an acknowledgement that this message has been received Thank you for your attention. Concerned Tukwila residents: Doug & Cheri Hans: 16037 - Robert Folgelman: 16027 - Doug & Betty Kramer: 16117 45th Ave. So. 45th Ave. So. - 45th Ave So. 206-242-9934 206-433-2862 206- 431-0255 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; Laura Beniamin; Jack Pace Subject: Fwd: Comprehensive Plan changes Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:38:38 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Jim Arthur <djarthurl @comcast.net> Date: September 7, 2015 at 11:43:06 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comprehensive Plan changes I understand that you will be considering changes to the Comprehensive Plan that would allow lot sizes smaller than the current 6500 SF. I oppose such a change. That is the wrong approach to a more densely populated Tukwila. Intermixing duplexes and townhomes in existing single family neighborhoods is probably a good idea, as long as they are allowed with decent set -backs and adequate off-street parking. Thank you. Jim Arthur 16444 53rd PI S Tukwila, WA 98188 206 277-7892 To: City Council citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov RE: Comprehensive Land Use Plan From: Sharon Johannessen 13930 56th. PL. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Dear Council, gl )1.3 The idea of increasing the multi -family housing (duplexes and townhouses) in single family neighborhoods is a terrible idea. I have lived here for over 20 years. The population has grown so much with all the other immigrants and other increased apartment dwellers, that police and emergency services are stretched thin to handle problems we already have now. Crime is constantly rising and the police can't keep up with all the other issues due to the constant criminal activity. Just to get the police to respond to a noise complaint or dog constantly barking which violates the TMC, you are lucky to see them within a half hour if at all. By then the loose dog is gone, the noise from loud music still continues unless I take care of it myself which puts me in jeopardy of retaliation. I have had to increase security around my home with cameras, sirens and monitored security system because of the several attempts of people trying to break in or other damage caused in the past by criminals. Police have been of little help and slow to respond. I even provided them with pictures and descriptions, but nothing is followed up on. I have to arm myself and lock doors out of fear of future attacks. And now you want to add to the problem! Current residential streets are insufficient for traffic and parking. The city is allowing additional hotels, motels, sports arena, other sports facilities etc. which also adds to the area population also resulting in increased traffic; police and emergency become stretched to the limit and crime activity is sure to increase. City code enforcement can't keep up with the problems now . Multiple tenants can also cause issues. With more people you have the possibility of having more drama between tenants. Drama can ensue Police departments have to respond to more nuisance calls. Making lot sizes smaller encourages construction of small houses making the neighborhood look like a subdivision of cracker boxes. The quality of people or residence typically are low income and those type of neighborhoods are cramped housing. This type of neighborhoods typically results in increased crime. More people also means more trash scattered along streets and around houses. Traffic becomes more congested. Adding multi multi family housing decreases single family property value. Inadequate parking is also a problem and adversely affects the surrounding residence. Larger lots make for better looking houses encouraging better responsible neighbors, the neighborhood looks cleaner with better maintained homes and the overall streets and infrastructure is easier to be maintained. Police coverage and emergency services are not stretched to the limit to the point of losing control. You need to learn from other cities and jurisdictions. Poor planning invites more problems, good planning improves the area, makes for a cleaner city. All you need to do is look at highway 99 and challenges there. Then look at city of Sammamish or Bellevue. That in its self should give you a hint. Sincerely, Sharon Johannessen From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Jack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Zoning Code Changes Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 9:52:57 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Pat LARSON <patclarson@msn.com> Date: September 8, 2015 at 9:14:42 AM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Zoning Code Changes I am writing this email because I am unable to attend tonight's City Council meeting and I have significant concerns about the proposed changes to the Zoning Code. First, I understand the council's belief is the change in zoning code is intended to bring more affordable housing into Tukwila. I would counter that thought with the premise that this change in zoning is directly related to high density housing to support the light rail system. Second, it is my belief the planning department is using their knowledge of urban planning to create an urban plan that is based on economics and not what is truly best for our community. i would venture a guess that each of the employees in the planning department is not a resident of Tukwila. So their investment in our community is to create an comprehensive plan that meets their professional needs and do their job, and not to make a decision that may be in the best interests of the people who live in Tukwila after 5 PM and on the weekends. Third, I would agree with Councilman Robertson, that there appears to be a "hurry up" and get this passed, when in fact it may be time to slow down and explore the entire issue. If the city paid attention to the affordable housing that we already have, the section 8 housing and the large apartment complexes and made sure the living conditions were appropriate, we might not be talking about this at all. Is the city working in collaboration with the Housing Authority to create a housing that is multifaceted and allows people who may start out renting to actually be able to afford a home when they are able? The example to be considered would be the Housing Authority's reconstruction of Park Lake Homes 1 and 2 into multiple faceted affordable housing that people can feel proud to live in and even own. Personally, it feels like those of us who have large lots and enjoy having them, are being forced to make changes that we may not want to make. Is this an effort to force people to move out of Tukwila? I don't believe this would happen in Normandy Park nor in parts of Bellevue or Newcastle where some of our planners live. We, the residents of Tukwila, are counting on you, the council to explore all avenues of this issue and not rush into a comprehensive plan that does not meet the needs of all residents. Pat Larson 14244 -55th Ave. So. Tukwila. WA. 98168 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Beniamin Subject: Fwd: rezoning proposal Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:22:01 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Robert Codd <bobcodd@gmail.com> Date: September 8, 2015 at 10:10:45 AM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: rezoning proposal To whom it may concern: I am not sure if I will be able to attend the city council meeting this evening. If I can't make it in person I wanted to let you know that I am in favor of the proposed rezoning that the council is exploring. Thank you, Robert Codd 4240 So. 158th St. Tukwila, 98188 206 755 3906 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff; Jack Pace Subject: Fwd: Regarding Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:34:21 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Kim Mummert <mummert56@hotmail.com> Date: September 7, 2015 at 6:31:59 PM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Regarding Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Dear Council Members, I am writing this email to each of you to address the possibility of changes to the current zoning of lot sizes and offering affordable housing in our community. Being a 2nd generation home owner in the City of Tukwila for the past 55 years, I have seen the City grow and change to what it is today. I lived in Tukwila before Southcenter Mall or even Interstate 5 existed. I have always been involved in City issues where I believed it would benefit our city to be the best possible place to live. I think that changing our existing lot sizes to offer more duplexes and townhouses would be a great mistake. I think that Tukwila is already such a transient city. While I do believe our city needs an affordable safe senior living community, I do not believe that adding other living areas in established single family neighborhoods like "old tukwila" the one where I have lived for many many years would be beneficial to our neighborhood character. I "would" like to see the council address homes that have garbage, multiple non - running vehicles, just plain junk on homeowners property and have regulations that are truly enforced. We need to clean up the city, and reward our homeowners for pride of ownership! I would also like the council to continue to provide our police force with the necessary resources to work on our overall crime rate. Thank you for your time regarding these issues. i Regards, Kim Buehler Mummert From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff; )ack Pace Subject: Fwd: no more multi -family housing Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 8:34:40 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: <xogclark@comcast.net> Date: September 7, 2015 at 6:45:41 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Cc: <rogclark@comcast.net> Subject: no more multi -family housing Attention Tukwila City Council members, have been a Tukwila resident for over 23 years. I want my city to become better and more livable. I'm hearing that Tukwila wants to build multi -family housing such as duplexes and townhouses in single family neighborhoods. This is a bad idea. Tukwila already has too many multi -family housing units. Please put your effort in improving Tukwila and not ruining it by building more duplexes and townhouses. Thank you. Roger and Tricia Clark 16024 51st Ave. S. Tukwila Wa. 98188 206-242-4475 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Jack Pace; Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff Subject: Fwd: Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:47:02 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: David Traynor <dtraynor@gmail.com> Date: September 8, 2015 at 10:41:53 AM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Council, I recently received notification that the Tukwila City Council is planning on passing a comprehensive land use plan that allows "exploring" changes in zoning that may allow for smaller log sizes and for multi -family housing (Such as duplexes and townhouses) in existing neighborhoods. I wholeheartedly oppose any legislation or plan that allows (or even explores) this type of zoning. As a lifetime resident of the city (45 year), I have seen how that type of zoning negativity impacts neighborhoods, property values and quality of life. This zoning is not good for residents and is simply for contractors making a quick buck. I ask that you vote "No" to any legislation or plan that even "explores" these options. 11 David & Jennifer Traynor 4902 S. 161st St. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:47:39 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Lois <dw.ynetraynor@hotmail.com> Date: September 8, 2015 at 10:45:50 AM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Council, I recently received notification that the Tukwila City Council is planning on passing a comprehensive land use plan that allows "exploring" changes in zoning that may allow for smaller log sizes and for multi -family housing (Such as duplexes and townhouses) in existing neighborhoods. I oppose any legislation or plan that allows (or even explores) this type of zoning. I have been a Tukwila resident for over 60 years and have seen how that type of zoning negativity impacts neighborhoods, property values and quality of life. This zoning will not benefit existing residents and is simply for home builders to make money. I urge you to vote "No" to any legislation or plan that even "explores" these options. 111 Lois Traynor 14910 58th Ave. S. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Proposed zoning change Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 9:53:19 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Charles Trett <charlestrett@yahoo.com> Date: September 8, 2015 at 9:15:53 AM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov>, "dennis.robertson@tukwilawa.gov" <dennis. robertson@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Proposed zoning change Reply -To: Charles Trett <charlestrett@yahoo.com> Honored Council Members, I have become aware, through the efforts of your fellow council member Dennis Robertson of a proposed zoning change that disturbs me greatly. That you are 'exploring' lot sizes smaller the the current 6,500 SF for duplexes and townhouses in existing single family neighborhoods. This is about two things, a socialist idea of 'mixing' neighborhoods and simple greed of land owners who don't live here, both of which I find reprehensible. This change would adversely affect our neighborhoods resulting in higher crime rates and lower property values. I am wholeheartedly opposed to this and I plan to keep up with any progress of this terrible proposal and those who support it. God Bless, Charles R. Trett 15617 47th Ave. S Tukwila, WA, 98188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Jack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: land use "exploring" Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:10:27 PM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Gary LaPine <GaryLaPine@msn.com> Date: September 8, 2015 at 5:29:47 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: land use 'exploring' As long time Tukwila residents we feel that 'exploring' the idea of multi family housing will ruin the open feel of our neighborhoods. The reason we moved here over fifty years ago was the country feel. We do not need this 'exploring' added to our comprehensive plan. Please leave this City alone. Gary and Diane LaPine 14443 58th Ave. S. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; Jack Pace Subject: Fwd: Exploring Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:10:45 PM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: WILLIAM JOHN <wjcrow1ey520@msn.com> Date: September 8, 2015 at 5:48:13 PM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Exploring • I'm against the words " explored ', or " exploring " being put in the new Comprehensive Plan which will pass on Sept. 21st. So leave them out. William John Crowley 5101 S 163rd Pl Tukwila, WA 98188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Beniamin; Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; David Cline Subject: Fwd: Comprehensive land use plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 9:54:02 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Holly R Adanti <hollyrae@comcast.net> Date: September 8, 2015 at 9:33:42 AM PDT To: <citycouncil@TukwilaWa.gov> Subject: Comprehensive land use plan Have you asked yourself, do I want duplexes and townhouses in my neighborhood? I certainly do not. My family has lived in the same house since 1963, that's 52 years! I live on a cul-de-sac with 12 other homes, some occupied by the original owners. There are so many reasons why this is a horrible idea. If you give it a moment of thought for what is best for the people of Tukwila, I think you would have the same answer as all the people I have talked to, NO. Holly Adanti Tukwila resident From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Jack Pace; David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 9:53:41 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: KAY SCHWARZMANN Owner <kay0706@centurylink.net> Date: September 8, 2015 at 9:19:03 AM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comprehensive Land Use Plan It has been brought to my attention that the City of Tukwila is considering a Comprehensive Land Use Plan that would allow smaller lot sizes as well as duplexes and townhouses in single family neighborhoods. This was voted down several years ago and needs to be enforced. As a Tukwila taxpayer for 38 years, I do not want to have condo's, townhouses and multi family residences in the my neighborhood. Multi family residences brings more renters, more congestion and ultimately more crime. More money in the coffers does not necessarily mean "progress". Keep Tukwila a desired neighborhood. Katherine Schwarzmann 16251 52nd Ave S Tukwila, WA 98188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: aack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; David Cline Subject: FW: Tukwila proposed Land Use Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:57:45 PM From: mch1012@comcast.net [mailto:mch1012@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:54 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Tukwila proposed Land Use RE: letter rec'd regarding Tukwila's proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan 'exploring' lot sizes smaller than the current 6500 SF and duplexes and townhouses in existing single family neighorhoods. We cannot attend the meeting Tuesday, Sept 8 at 7pm at City Hall, but DO NOT want our neighborhood to change in the way mentioned above. thank you, Mr. and Mrs. Ray Ellison mch1012@comcast.net Tukwila, WA 98188 From: 1,aurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: )ack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; David Cline Subject: FW: Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:58:52 PM From: Randy Grove [mailto:rgrovemail@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 6:58 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Dear Tukwila City Council, Ramona and I have lived in Tukwila for 26 years and raised our family here. We regret that we cannot attend the City Council meeting to discuss the proposed zoning changes. We are writing you this evening so our voices can be heard. It concerns us that allowing multi -family dwellings on lots that are currently zoned Single Family will change Tukwila in ways that are not beneficial to the community. If multi -unit townhouses or condominiums are allowed to be built in single family residence communities, you may be surprised at the number of objections. Has the City Council polled the community to see what the response is? The City Council must get community input before drastically changing the fabric of the place we call home! Having such a law may result in the population density of a neighborhood increasing by 2, 3 or 4 fold. And where do all the cars, trailers, boats, etc. go? And what about additional road traffic and noise levels? If Tukwila wants to explore higher density housing approaches, then they need to do it in a contiguous area that is zoned that way. Perhaps the City Council should buy up properties in a depressed area and rebuild like the area up along Roxbury Street in Seattle. Those units are very attractive and located such that the adjoining single family neighborhoods are left intact, and the infrastructure is already in place to support the higher density. Rather than proceeding with a plan to explore/ implement multi -family dwellings in single family neighborhoods, Tukwila should provide ample opportunities to voice their opinions and concerns. As for us, we are on the record of opposing multi -unit dwellings in single family neighborhoods. Thanks for listening, Randy and Ramona Grove 16030 48th Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 206-246-2837 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin Subject: FW: Rosemary Akre 16645 53rd Ave SE Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:36:32 PM Original Message From: Rosemary Akre [railto:rakre@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:35 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Rosemary Akre 16645 53rd Ave SE Oppose condos and town homes in tukwila Rosemary Akre Sent from my iPad From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; ack Pace; Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff Subject: FW: No to duplexes ! Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:41:01 PM Original Message From: Parmalee Brouillard [mailto:parmalee@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:34 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: No to duplexes ! To the counsel members I do not want duplexes in my neighborhood ! ! Thank you Parmalee Brouillard 5112 south al63rd place Tukwila. Wa Sent from my iPhone From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: )ack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; David Cline Subject: FW: NO to comprehensive land use plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:59:54 PM From: Cheryl Bynum [mailto:jimandcher@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 6:59 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: NO to comprehensive land use plan Tukwila City Council Members, Please vote NO to exploring multi -family domiciles in our neighborhoods!! The Bynum & Diaz Family 14141 57th Ave S Tukwila, WA From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: ,lack Pace; Nora Gierloff; David Cline; Laura Benjamin Subject: FW: NO regarding comprehensive land use exploring Small lot sizes and multi family re -zones Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:41:14 PM From: Scott Val Matson [mailto:svmatson@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:40 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: NO regarding comprehensive land use exploring Small lot sizes and multi family re -zones City Council, we are concerned about any potential to re -zone single family neighborhoods in Tukwila, but are not available to attend the meeting tonight. We strongly oppose the action taken towards smaller lot sizes in existing single-family neighborhoods of Tukwila and the allowing of multi -family zoning within existing single- family neighborhoods. The re -zoning or allowing duplex and smaller lot sized amounts to a windfall for the existing property owner seeking to use smaller lots. The value of the property will tend to increase. Conversely, the value of neighboring properties will suffer in value, a "taking" by Tukwila. (Don't forget about what it would do to parking on our streets. Total street parking also reduces neighborhood value) Scenario one: All equal priced homes. Developer buys the house next door for $300K and builds a duplex or maybe we allow a four-plex. This property may be work $400-$500 K, a windfall, while the next-door home would tend to drop in value. The only to receive the "new" valuation would be to sell to a developer. Staying would be paying for an overvalued property and not having the same "quiet enjoyment" as when you purchased the property. Scenario two: Imagine a nice house, maybe the newest in the block. If a developer can buy up 2 properties next door at the value of the new house (not uncommon in Tukwila) the developer could build several rental units. (Two $250K houses vs one $500K house) The higher value home may not be valuable as a teardown, but with duplexes on either side, will automatically lose value. If Tukwila was going to consider this, then the rezoned property should pay a re -zone fee equal to the re -zoned value. Two appraisals, one as is ($250K) , the other as multi -family or duplex ($300K). I would propose the re -zone fee would be $50K in this instance. Not done yet. The properties nearby, should also have two appraisals. i as is ($250K) on if a multi -family project is built next door ($200K) The city of Tukwila should pay the difference for "Taking" of property value. This could be several properties, as one re -zone could affect 10-20+ properties. PARKING: If allowed, there should be ample on -property parking available. We have all driven down a street with parking lining both sides, difficult for everyday people and extreme for emergency services. No need to follow Seattle on this one. Horne ownership is what makes Tukwila a strong community; please do not turn it into the rental capitol of south Seattle. If Tukwila would like to re -zone a large area, then Tukwila should be willing to purchase the properties at market value. Otherwise, we would be bringing economic harm to our neighbors, to benefit a few developers. Scott Matson 206-229-3188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff; Jack Pace; David Cline Subject: FW: For City Council Mtg Tues Sept 8th Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 7:09:42 PM From: Jonathan Peterson [mailto:jonkyoko@q.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 7:08 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: For City Council Mtg Tues Sept 8th Tukwila City Council Members, Just want to say, No!, Please... Keep out Townhomes and "Shoe Horn" houses from our residential areas. Grand Father in older areas to keep out extra small lots and townhome developments. But I think you can make changes with only newly annexed or recently added areas say from 10 to 12 years back. Otherwise you need only look to Ballard to see the devastation to residential areas when this kind of small lot and multi -family units are allowed. Road traffic increases, parking becomes scarce, the feel of "neighborhood" changes and no longer has that familiar warm feel. Yes you may get more taxes, and you will get more parking violation calls so you can collect more fines... which is what you really want... More Money... Please think about how to live with what you have budget wise before trying to get more money any way you can, by hook or crook... If projects can only be done one at a time do them one at time like we have to do. Like I said Keep Old Tukwila Residential without the possibility of smaller lots and multi-fam zoning but for newer added areas fine let them be denser... Also if there is an old area (several acres) where a new development will go in with more density, fine... I just don't like Shoe Horn and Multi -Family in old established neighborhoods in a lot next to mine... Thanks for your hearing, Jon From: laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: )ack Pace; David Cline; Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff Subject: FW: Disagreement with exploration of lot sizes in comprehensive plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 7:09:09 PM Original Message From: Eb [mailto:catgirl@mindspring.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 7:07 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Disagreement with exploration of lot sizes in comprehensive plan Dear City Council members, I am al 1 year resident and home owner in Tukwila, 98168, on North Hill. I am against the idea and development of plans towards density increase in single family neighborhoods. Please provide more time for community members to learn about and respond in a fair and equitable manner in regards to any further movement on this matter. Respectfully, Erin Bristow 425-204-2121 Sent from my iPad From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: )ack Pace• Nora Gierloff; David Cline; Laura Benjamin Subject: FW: Comprehensive plan feedback Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:14:30 PM From: Joan Hernandez [mailto:cmjoanh@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 1:27 PM To: kjhougardy@comcast.net; april_chanes@hotmail.com; brennanbarl@aol.com; brenda.schenck@gmail.com; ehougardy@comcast.net; jtklund@aol.com; danlaura7@hotmail.com; Gasnomore@aol.com; rustyt@badensports.com; Sueann.Misiak@Boeing.com; Samntoby5@yahoo.com; yvonnetrudeau@msn.com; myke43@aol.com Cc: Laurel Humphrey Subject: Re: Comprehensive plan feedback Kathy, thank you so much for the extra efforts you have taken to keep residents informed on the comprehensive planning progress. I agree with many of the comments I have read from residents who have replied to your email and hope those residents will continue to provide their feedback to the council and staff. Even with my experience as a former councilmember, with all the past experience I have had working on comprehensive plans, I have found this process both challenging and frustrating at times. As much as staff and council have tried to make this transparent and easy for lay people to understand and follow, in my opinion it can still difficult for laypeople to work their way through the process to assure their voices are being heard. As an interested citizen, I attended both the planning commission public hearing on June 25th and the council public hearing on August 10th. When I spoke before the planning commission, commission members seemed receptive to my comments and their minutes reflect that the chair of the planning commission asked for my comments to be placed in the matrix. On August 16, 2015, I submitted my public hearing written comments to the council and staff and they appeared on page 123 and 124 of the August 24th 179 page agenda packet. The Matrix on page 107 of that agenda shows that the staff concurred with my recommendation to include the definition of historic preservation in the comprehensive plan. However, the continued Matrix on Page 108 shows that staff edited and deleted my other comments because they felt my concerns were adequately addressed in the community image and identity section of the comp plan. Therefore, since you didn't have the opportunity to read those comments, I attended the next council public hearing to once again request that some language be added to the Housing and Neighborhood Elements section to cross reference readers with the language that refers to historic preservation in the community image and identity section as I felt that readers reading only the Housing and Residential Neighborhood Elements may not realize that historic preservation is addressed separately in the Community Image and Identity Section. Unfortunately, I think that was the council meeting that ran so late that I left before making my oral comments and submitted my written comments by the August 17th deadline for your August 24th meeting. I realize you had a very heavy agenda to read, digest and discuss; on August 24th; however, I think there was a lot of confusion created because you were provided with so many different Matrix's to review. Therefore, it is possible you may have overlooked the matrix on 107 and 108 and my written comments on pages 123 and 124 of the August 24th agenda packet as you were also provided with separate a separate matrix on pages 165-175 in the same agenda packet in addition to another hard copy matrix that the council was given to work with. I totally respect staff and council's opinion on this and I can accept the fact that not everyone may agree with me; however, this is just an example of how hard it is for a local citizen to try to navigate the system in order to let their voices be heard. I truly thank everyone for their attempts to achieve a clearer understanding of the process and I like the assurance we were given that although the public hearings have closed, there will always be opportunities for continued dialogue in the future. —Joan Hernandez Original Message From: Kathy Hougardy <kjhougardy@comcast.net> To: 'April Chanes' <april_chanes@hotmail.com>; 'Barbara Wu' <brennanbarl @aol.com>; 'Brenda' <brenda.schenck0gmail.com>; 'Ed at home' <ehougardyecomcast.net>; 'Judy & Terry Lund' <jtklund@aol.com>; 'Laura Hopp' <danlaura7@hotmail.com>; 'Louie Wu' <Gasnomore@aol.com>; 'Rusty at work Trudeau' <rustyt@badensports.com>; 'Sue Ann Misiak' <Sueann.MisiakaBoeing.com>; 'SueAnn Misiak' <Samntoby5(@yahoo.com>; 'Yvonne Trudeau' <yvonnetrudeau@msn.com>; 'Gerry Mykelbust' <myke43@aol.com>; Joan Hernandez <cmjoanh@aol.com> Sent: Mon, Sep 7, 2015 5:39 pm Subject: RE: Comprehensive plan feedback Good afternoon — I am writing to you as a follow-up regarding the status of the Comprehensive Plan. It is being finalized at this time, and currently I am good with the plan with the changes that the council has made. I hear that there is still some concern out there, so I wanted to respond to some of those issue before the council meeting tomorrow night. I am committed to having intact residential neighborhoods, so I met several times with city staff in the last few weeks to double and triple check my facts regarding the plan, giving staff scenarios and how they would play out. In fact, I was wearing my "council hat" so much that I will be sending you my letter via city e-mail instead of here. Look for it in your inbox soon — if you still have questions, please contact me. Thanks! Kathy From: Kathy Hougardy[mailto:kjhougardyCa�comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 12:33 AM To: 'April Chanes'; 'Barbara Wu (brennanbarl(&aol.com)'; 'Brenda'; 'Ed at home'; 'Judy & Terry Lund'; 'Kathy Hougardy (kjhougardy(acomcast.net)'; 'Laura Hopp'; 'Louie Wu (Gasnomore(&aol.com)'; 'Rusty at work Trudeau'; 'Sue Ann Misiak'; 'SueAnn Misiak (Samntoby5(ayahoo.corrt)'; 'Yvonne Trudeau'; 'Gerry Mykelbust' Subject: Comprehensive plan feedback Hi again — Thanks to you all who were able to attend the Public Hearing on the comprehensive plan on Monday. Unfortunately, by the time the Public Hearing started, it was pretty late in the evening. If you would still like to comment, you can send an e-mail to the city. Every comment sent between now and the 17th will be compiled, and should be addressed on a chart called "the Matrix" that the council receives. So if you want to submit some written comments, I would encourage you to do so. We didn't get a lot of comments from the community — many of those who testified lived somewhere other than Tukwila and were working for various agencies. I personally would love to see more input from people who actually live here. As a reminder, here are some of the topics that the comp plan addresses either directly or indirectly: Affordable housing • Air B&Bs • Condos • Cottage housing • Duplexes • Group Homes • Manufactured homes • Mixed use development • Mobile homes • Mother-in-law apartments • Sidewalk policies • Single family housing in -fill • Smaller lot sizes • Townhomes If you have any thoughts on any of these or other related topics, send a short (or long) e- mail to: The city council at citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov And Dept. of Community Development at nora.gierloff@,tukwilawa.gov By August 17th. Feel free to pass this information on. Thanks so much, Kathy From: Laurel Humphrey To: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; Jack Pace Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 11:52:38 AM From: April Chanes [mailto:april_chanes@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:24 AM To: Kathy Hougardy; Brenda Schenck; 'Ed at home'; 'Judy & Terry Lund'; Dan & Laura Hopp; rustyt@badensports.com; 'Sue Ann Misiak'; Yvonne trudeau; 'Gerry Mykelbust'; Joan Hernandez; david.j.puki@boeing.com Cc: Joe Duffle; Dennis Robertson; Kate Kruller; Allan Ekberg; Verna Seal; De'Sean Quinn; Kathy Hougardy; Laurel Humphrey Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Thank you for the email Kathy, very helpful information. I do plan to make the meeting tonight, but thought I would also comment via email reply. As a life long member of the Tukwila Community, the changes our city has gone through and will continue to go through, are important me. I'd actually like to start with a request. There are many references in your email to "public process" before some of the changes under consideration could actually be executed. Request: Can we please make access to notification of this process and background information easy? I'll be the first to acknowledge I've not been totally plugged into this Comprehensive Plan process. I did attend the last council meeting/public hearing wherein I thought an overview of the Plan was going to be presented so we would know what the possible considerations for change were going to be. This was not at all what I came away from the meeting with. When I went to the City website the next day to try and figure out what was going on, I did not find it easy to obtain the information either. Pretty much everything else discussed at the meeting did have a link right on the main page so it was easy to see what the current status of each project was. I know several of us at the last meeting felt ill prepared to make any comment at that time, and this evening's meeting also seems to have snuck up on us as well - not even referenced on the website at all today. Many of us are not able to attend every meeting, so anything to make it easier to access information (possibly in a summary format) with regard to what is going on with our City and the "public process" would be greatly appreciated. I'm totally comfortable with the Council getting the weeds of the matter. But in order for us to feel comfortable commenting, we need to be able to access information so we know what is on the table and what the process is for comment to the issues. Your email contains good information, but even though I've now been able to find some info on the website, I'm still having difficulty tying info from the email back to info I find on the website. 'Thank you! As to some of the points below: Subsidized housing - apartment complexes are referenced, but what out others such as Section 8 rental homes? Does the City have control of this and what are the considerations here? It is sad that substandard living conditions can seem to follow this type housing, either apartments or rental homes. I whole heartedly support anything that can be done do regulate and enforce the elimination of these substandard conditions. Lot sizes - I am from the Tukwila Hill neighborhood. I would not be in support of the lot size reduction now or in the future. Smaller lots may fit into other neighborhoods, but I do not think it fits into ours. Sizes and types of single houses - I am concerned with any additional "monster" type homes going up in neighborhoods where they obviously look totally out of place and where the architecture is not in keeping with Tukwila. Since this discussion is happening over the next few years, is there any current restrictions from any additional monster homes going in now? Kindest regards, April Chanes From: Kathy.Hougardy@TukwilaWA.gov To: april_chanes@hotmail.com; brenda.schenck@gmail.com; ehougardy@comcast.net; jtklund@aol.com; danlaura7@hotmail.com; rustyt@badensports.com; Sueann.Misiak@Boeing.com; yvonnetrudeau@msn.com; myke43@aol.com; cmjoanh@aol.com; david.j.puki@boeing.com CC: Joe.Duffie@TukwilaWA.gov; Dennis.Robertson@TukwilaWA.gov; Kate.Kruller@TukwilaWA.gov; Allan.Ekberg@TukwilaWA.gov; Verna.Seal@TukwilaWA.gov; DeSean.Quinn@TukwilaWA.gov; kjhougardy@comcast.net; kjhougardy@comcast.net; Laurel.Humphrey@TukwilaWA.gov Subject: Comprehensive Plan Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 00:51:50 +0000 Good Afternoon — I am writing to express my support for the current Comprehensive Plan as it stands now with the Council's changes. I'll explain why by breaking my information into topics. Each topic (called an Element) of the Comprehensive Plan has three parts: Goals — Broad statements of community aspiration, or direction, related to a section Policies — specific statements about the community's position on issues relating to land use and development in the section Implementation strategies — possible approaches to the implementation of policies in the section During its review of the Plan, the council softened the language in several key areas regarding implementation strategies, so it is clear that they are possible approaches rather than directives. This was a small but very important change. Implementation strategies should be regarded as options and are subject to a review process by Council, the Planning Commission and the Public as they are considered for adoption. There is a clear directive to preserve our stable neighborhoods in Policy 7.1.1: Policy 7.1.1: "Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single-family and stable multi -family neighborhoods; eliminates incompatible land uses; and clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries." Remember this is Policy— a specific statement about the community's position on issues relating to land use and development. It emphasizes the importance of our existing single family neighborhoods, and encourages stability in the multi -family neighborhoods. The following is a review of certain parts of the plan, as they stand now: Multi -family housing - apartments and condominiums: In Tukwila this is mostly rental apartments, although there are condominiums as well. There is no proposal in the Comp Plan to rezone existing residential areas to allow apartments. Regarding expansion of multi -unit housing: There is intention to create mixed-use urban -type development in the Tukwila Village, Southcenter and Tukwila Valley South areas, so the Comp Plan suggests that condos and apartments will be allowed there in the future. The plan for those areas calls for high-quality development. Affordable housing: Affordable housing could be thought of as a diverse range of housing options for a variety of income levels such as teachers, health care professionals, and single income families. Two units would be the maximum for any of these types, with the exception of cottage housing, which would be a group of smaller houses. There has been quite a bit of discussion about this, and I've heard both support and opposition from members of the community. I didn't think it would be fair to abolish any of these housing types outright in the Comp Plan without the different neighborhoods being able to have their say. Some neighborhoods may want them; some may not. Or we could just allow them in areas that are zoned for high density already. Nothing is going to happen without a public process, going through both the planning commission and the council. Later I will write about how to make sure that the wishes of our different neighborhoods are heard when the discussion is revisited. Mother -In -Law apartments: Here's more detail. In city -speak these are called accessory dwelling units, or ADUs. We have them in every neighborhood, and currently they are allowed by the Tukwila Municipal Code. However, if you look at the rules for permitted use, you will see that it's hard to meet the requirements as outlined in the code, so many of our ADUs are non -conforming. Should we continue to allow them, and if so, does the code need revision? Are there any areas where ADUs should not be allowed? These are things to consider when implementing the Comprehensive Plan. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Subsidized housing: According to the Comprehensive Plan, the place for subsidized apartment complexes will be in the areas zoned for apartments already. We have heard via the public process that some of our apartments have deplorable living conditions despite the rental inspections. The Council plans to consider an even higher level of inspection standards for these units in the near future. If an affordable housing agency is willing and able to take over one of these complexes, rehabilitate it, and manage it well, I am in full support of that. Higher quality apartments that are affordable could help people with financial issues to be more stable. This should then help with some of the issues facing our schools regarding the high turnover of students. Lot sizes: The decision to reduce lot sizes, if at all, should depend on the wishes and needs of the individual neighborhood. The Comp Plan allows us to explore this issue. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Sizes and types of single houses: The Comp Plan states that new houses built in neighborhoods should be "in harmony with the existing neighborhood." What does that mean in each neighborhood when it comes to things like the size or the set -back of a new house? This discussion will be happening within the next few years, and input from our residents is critical so that the best decision can be made for each neighborhood. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Support for home -owners: The Comprehensive Plan also includes language to help preserve the stability of our residential neighborhoods by encouraging the City to explore providing additional resources to assist residents with home repair and maintenance, and ways to support first-time homebuyers to encourage greater rates of home ownership. Tukwila International Boulevard District on Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) The TIB District boundaries, originally established in the 1990s, have been redrawn to encompass a smaller area. The Cascade View and Riverton neighborhoods are no longer a part of the district. This is an important change. The TIB vision statement states that the district will include places to live, work, shop and play. As you travel outward from TIB in this district, the plan calls for buildings to transition in size and design to better match the character of the adjacent single family neighborhoods. Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) node The TOD node is the area within a half -mile radius of the TIB Light Rail station. The Comp Plan Policy states that this area will be designated for a more intensive, transit -oriented mix of mid- to high-rise office, multifamily residential and hospitality uses and services with structured parking. This area contains single family homes as you get further out in the half -mile radius. Conversations with staff have included the idea that the look and feel of the node will transition as you get farther away from the station, and could possibly include sidewalks and bike lanes for some of the streets with houses. No multifamily units could happen in these residential neighborhoods unless there was a rezone proposed which once again would trigger the process of going through the Planning Commission, the Council, and the Public Comment process. Conclusion As I've mention previously, all of these issues will be discussed within the next year. It is critical that the council knows your thoughts and desires in these processes. With your input, the council can make the best decisions possible for each neighborhood. If you have suggestions for public outreach, let us know. What is the best way for us to reach you and your neighbors, and how do you prefer to give your comments? Right now, a good way to contact us is in writing, so that we can easily pass on and retain your message. E-mail Citycouncil(d tukwilawa.gov . You can also call me at 206-571- 0007. Thanks. Sincerely, Kathy Hougardy Tukwila City Councilmember NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: This e-mail account is public domain. Any correspondence from or to this e-mail account is a public record. Accordingly, this e-mail, in whole or in part, may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56, regardless of any claim of confidentiality or privilege asserted by an external party. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; )ack Pace; Laura Benjamin Subject: FW: Comprehensive land use plan Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:02:15 PM Original Message From: Kim Pham [mailto:kimhpham65@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:59 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Comprehensive land use plan Hi, my name is Kim Pham and I live at 5305 Slade way. I do not want the comprehensive land use plan because it will compromise the safety of our neighborhood. From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Laurel Humphrey Council Members David Cline; Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Beniamin FW: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Tuesday, September 08, 2015 2:01:39 PM From: mokapc@aol.com [mailto:mokapc@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 1:57 PM To: CityCouncil Cc: Dennis Robertson Subject: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Hello— My name is Paula Cabunoc. I have attended past meetings regarding the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan. I spoke & was on record at the June 25th meeting at City Hall. I have also emailed you regarding that meeting & my thoughts about the issues at hand. I firmly believe changing lot sizes & allowing smaller sub -platting is a detriment to our established neighborhoods. These big box houses, using a single access road do not "blend in" with the current neighborhood. They tower over & dwarf the surrounding houses. Occasionally, there are 2-3 families living in these huge houses with 4-6 cars per residence. This severely impacts congestion, noise issues & vehicle emissions in our area. We have seen emergency vehicles/personnel not be able to reach a residence, or get lost & have to come in another way. Our neighborhood is zoned for "low density", single, family housing, not these types of housing situations. Stacking these houses in so closely, many with very little yard space, definitely impacts any "open" space there might be. We experienced an unpleasant situation a year ago with a developer coming in, clear cutting almost all of the trees, which damaged our fence as well as our neighbor's fence. We were in contact with the City over all of this. For some unknown reason, he was penalized by the City for not doing something right, I don't recall the exact problem. We found out he could cut all the trees down with no repercussion; a permit was not required. After the City visited him on numerous occasions, he had to get a permit of some kind. He did put in a short retaining wall with drainage but the damage was done. Our back yard "fell" off, our fence is catywhompus & crooked; the stability is no longer there. He replaced the 2 sections of fence of our neighbor's that a tree fell on but we both developed "sink holes" along our back yards. I personally spoke with the City inspector (Dave?) who came out; he said he would put his recommendations in writing but we've never heard anything back. Then, to top it off, the developer sold the property to someone else & whatever permit he had expired & he's off the hook. He assured us the new owners would "take care of us"...yeah, right, like that's going to happen. He also told us the new owners were going to build a "family compound"....he wasn't sure if there would be 3 or 4 houses built. Myself, as well as several other neighbors, have been in contact with Code Enforcement on numerous occasions regarding parking issues on 46th Ave. 160th is a very busy street, it is the only thru street to access all the houses from 42nd Ave to 51st Ave. The south thru street is 164th, so you can imagine the amount of traffic in this area already. 42nd Ave is also very busy, especially with the Tukwila Light Rail station at the bottom of the hill. There have been quite a few accidents at 42nd & 160th, & also several near misses. People speed on 42nd as well as 160th, safety is a definite issue. As I stated last night, many of the houses have 3+ vehicles with many parked on the street, not in driveways. Some residents were parking commercial vehicles on the street but after a 2-3 month battle, that seems to have resolved. I sincerely hope the planning commission sees fit to keep & restore the integrity of long time, well established housing developments. My husband bought our house in 1972, I've lived here since 1974. We are long time residents & value our neighborhood. Thank you, Paula M Cabunoc 16312 45th PI S Tukwila, WA 98188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; aack Pace Subject: FW: CLUP exploration Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:58:06 PM From: SandiM [mailto:smills903@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:54 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: CLUP exploration I have just found out about this new plan to "explore" lot sizes smaller than the current 6,500 SF and duplexes and townhouses in existing single family neighborhoods. I don't want to see multi -family housing in my neighborhood. It would change the feel of the community and more dense housing can create more noise issues, along with parking issues on our streets. Please take this into your decisions and listen to the citizens at the meeting tonight. Sincerely, Sandi Mills From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; David Cline Subject: FW: Changes to the City"s Comprehensive Plan Regarding Multi -Family Housing Options Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:58:33 PM From: mohlstrom@comcast.net [mailto:mohlstrom@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 6:53 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan Regarding Multi -Family Housing Options Dear City Council Members, My wife and I have lived in our City for 35 years and value the diversity and uniqueness which is Tukwila. We understand that the City Council is exploring changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan to allow for the construction of Duplexes and Townhomes on lots smaller than 6500 sq. ft. in size. We wish to voice our concern and opposition to allowing those changes in our current zoning regulations in all areas of our City. We respectfully request you re -look at this plan and to carefully consider keeping at least some areas of our City with a lower density residential zoning. Part of the uniqueness of our City is being able to enjoy neighborhoods with single family residences on lots larger than 6500 sq. ft. We would very much like to see that maintained. Please seek input from your various neighborhoods and undertake further studies to see where it makes sense to increase the density of housing and where it makes sense to maintain the density we currently have or which is allowable under the current zoning codes and regulations. Quality of life is very important and we need to work together for solutions that are respectful and that will work for all the various diverse groups that make up our City. Thank you for considering our request. Sincerely, Mark & Cathy Ohlstrom 16819 53rd Ave S Tukwila, WA 98188 From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin; jack Pace; David Cline Subject: FW: Vote - No Comprehensive Land Use Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:39:15 AM Original Message From: Kelly Diaz [mailto:kelly.diaz@fedex.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 8:53 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Vote - No Comprehensive Land Use I vote against the "exploring" of comprehensive land use in Tukwila. My number is below and my address is 14141 57th Ave S Kelly A Diaz Regional Administrative Assistant to Kimberly Stephens, Managing Director Sales Northwest Region FedEx Office 720.837.4277 CEL Kelly.diaz@fedex.com Find out how we can streamline your corporate business printing needs and improve productivity by visiting the FedEx Office Corporate Print Solutions site at www.fedex.com/corporateprint The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin; Jack Pace; Nora Gierloff; David Cline Subject: FW: Comprehensive Land Use - NO Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:39:34 AM From: Romeo and Kelly Diaz [mailto:romeoandkelly@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 8:56 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Comprehensive Land Use - NO I am voting NO on the comprehensive land use in Tukwila. 14141 57th Ave S Romeo Diaz From: Laurel Humphrey To: )ack Pace; David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Beniamin Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:39:51 AM From: Puki, David J [mailto:David.J.Puki@boeing.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 10:08 PM To: Kathy Hougardy; 'April Chanes'; 'Brenda'; 'Ed at home'; 'Judy & Terry Lund'; 'Laura Hopp'; rustyt@badensports.com; Misiak, Sueann; 'Yvonne Trudeau'; 'Gerry Mykelbust'; Joan Hernandez Cc: Joe Duffle; Dennis Robertson; Kate Kruller; Allan Ekberg; Verna Seal; De'Sean Quinn; kjhougardy@comcast.net; kjhougardy@comcast.net; Laurel Humphrey Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Hi Kathy, My major concern with the comp plan is that it still promotes higher density through rentals whether houses or apartments. With 59% of our citizens renting currently it creates other issues that cause city budget concerns. We have the third highest crime rate in the nation based on cities with our population density. We were just recently named the most dangerous city to live in the nation. The prostitution and drug scene is on the upswing on TIB again. I just heard Chief Flores say that dispatches are up 17% over the past 2 years primarily for medical aid. Foster Principal Pat Larsen spoke well of the problems low income students pose at school. Mary Fertakis spoke about the issues created by a transient student population. Pam Carter also spoke about the loss of community by the high rate turnover from rental properties. These issues all contribute to the increased cost to the city. I still believe that high quality owner occupied housing is the key to making Tukwila the community of choice. Most of the people that spoke at the hearing weren't even residents. They thanked us for all that we have done to create low income and subsidized housing and how they key to our future is doing more of the same. I disagree with that idea. Maintaining lot sizes, avoiding the creation of more ADU's, not allowing mega homes (like the one next door to me) and promoting home ownership is how we can reduce costs to the city and have high quality neighborhoods. I also live within the half mile circle surrounding the transit center. There is not capacity to handle crime that occurs there now. Much less prevent it. Building more higher density rental housing surrounding it just to encourage light rail use will also increase crime. I don't feel safe walking there or parking there now. Would you feel safe going there alone after dark? But that's what is being proposed in my neighborhood. Everyone is passing this comp plan off as a high level plan with the details to be decided later. The issue here is that it lacks any substance. And I have tried to find out exactly what it means and I can't. Remember the devil is in the details. I don't want to spend my time in the future keeping an eye on the planning commission and the city council just to make sure I'm informed as to the tricks being played. That's why we elect our council members. But this vaguely worded document will require a constant vigil from concerned residents. It needs to be clear and concise in its intent. Thanks, Dave From: Kathy Hougardy[mailto:Kathy.Hougardy(&TukwilaWA.gov] Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 5:52 PM To: 'April Chanes'; 'Brenda'; 'Ed at home'; 'Judy & Terry Lund'; 'Laura Hopp'; rustytbadensports.com; Misiak, Sueann; 'Yvonne Trudeau'; 'Gerry Mykelbust'; Joan Hernandez; Puki, David J Cc: Joe Duffie; Dennis Robertson; Kate Kruller; Allan Ekberg; Verna Seal; De'Sean Quinn; kjhougardy(acomcast.net; kjhougardy(acomcast.net; Laurel Humphrey Subject: Comprehensive Plan Good Afternoon — I am writing to express my support for the current Comprehensive Plan as it stands now with the Council's changes. I'll explain why by breaking my information into topics. Each topic (called an Element) of the Comprehensive Plan has three parts: Goals — Broad statements of community aspiration, or direction, related to a section Policies — specific statements about the community's position on issues relating to land use and development in the section Implementation strategies — possible approaches to the implementation of policies in the section During its review of the Plan, the council softened the language in several key areas regarding implementation strategies, so it is clear that they are possible approaches rather than directives. This was a small but very important change. Implementation strategies should be regarded as options and are subject to a review process by Council, the Planning Commission and the Public as they are considered for adoption. There is a clear directive to preserve our stable neighborhoods in Policy 7.1.1: Policy 7.1.1: "Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single-family and stable multi family neighborhoods; eliminates incompatible land uses; and clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries." Remember this is Policy— a specific statement about the community's position on issues relating to land use and development. It emphasizes the importance of our existing single family neighborhoods, and encourages stability in the multi -family neighborhoods. The following is a review of certain parts of the plan, as they stand now: Multi family housing - apartments and condominiums: In Tukwila this is mostly rental apartments, although there are condominiums as well. There is no proposal in the Comp Plan to rezone existing residential areas to allow apartments. Regarding expansion of multi -unit housing: There is intention to create mixed-use urban -type development in the Tukwila Village, Southcenter and Tukwila Valley South areas, so the Comp Plan suggests that condos and apartments will be allowed there in the future. The plan for those areas calls for high-quality development. Affordable housing: Affordable housing could be thought of as a diverse range of housing options for a variety of income levels such as teachers, health care professionals, and single income families. Two units would be the maximum for any of these types, with the exception of cottage housing, which would be a group of smaller houses. There has been quite a bit of discussion about this, and I've heard both support and opposition from members of the community. I didn't think it would be fair to abolish any of these housing types outright in the Comp Plan without the different neighborhoods being able to have their say. Some neighborhoods may want them; some may not. Or we could just allow them in areas that are zoned for high density already. Nothing is going to happen without a public process, going through both the planning commission and the council. Later I will write about how to make sure that the wishes of our different neighborhoods are heard when the discussion is revisited. Mother -In -Law apartments: Here's more detail. In city -speak these are called accessory dwelling units, or ADUs. We have them in every neighborhood, and currently they are allowed by the Tukwila Municipal Code. However, if you look at the rules for permitted use, you will see that it's hard to meet the requirements as outlined in the code, so many of our ADUs are non -conforming. Should we continue to allow them, and if so, does the code need revision? Are there any areas where ADUs should not be allowed? These are things to consider when implementing the Comprehensive Plan. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Subsidized housing: According to the Comprehensive Plan, the place for subsidized apartment complexes will be in the areas zoned for apartments already. We have heard via the public process that some of our apartments have deplorable living conditions despite the rental inspections. The Council plans to consider an even higher level of inspection standards for these units in the near future. If an affordable housing agency is willing and able to take over one of these complexes, rehabilitate it, and manage it well, I am in full support of that. Higher quality apartments that are affordable could help people with financial issues to be more stable. This should then help with some of the issues facing our schools regarding the high turnover of students. Lot sizes: The decision to reduce lot sizes, if at all, should depend on the wishes and needs of the individual neighborhood. The Comp Plan allows us to explore this issue. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Sizes and types of single houses: The Comp Plan states that new houses built in neighborhoods should be "in harmony with the existing neighborhood." What does that mean in each neighborhood when it comes to things like the size or the set -back of a new house? This discussion will be happening within the next few years, and input from our residents is critical so that the best decision can be made for each neighborhood. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Support for home -owners: The Comprehensive Plan also includes language to help preserve the stability of our residential neighborhoods by encouraging the City to explore providing additional resources to assist residents with home repair and maintenance, and ways to support first-time homebuyers to encourage greater rates of home ownership. Tukwila International Boulevard District on Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) The TIB District boundaries, originally established in the 1990s, have been redrawn to encompass a smaller area. The Cascade View and Riverton neighborhoods are no longer a part of the district. This is an important change. The TIB vision statement states that the district will include places to live, work, shop and play. As you travel outward from TIB in this district, the plan calls for buildings to transition in size and design to better match the character of the adjacent single family neighborhoods. Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) node The TOD node is the area within a half -mile radius of the TIB Light Rail station. The Comp Plan Policy states that this area will be designated for a more intensive, transit -oriented mix of mid- to high-rise office, multifamily residential and hospitality uses and services with structured parking. This area contains single family homes as you get further out in the half - mile radius. Conversations with staff have included the idea that the look and feel of the node will transition as you get farther away from the station, and could possibly include sidewalks and bike lanes for some of the streets with houses. No multifamily units could happen in these residential neighborhoods unless there was. a rezone proposed which once again would trigger the process of going through the Planning Commission, the Council, and the Public Comment process. Conclusion As I've mention previously, all of these issues will be discussed within the next year. It is critical that the council knows your thoughts and desires in these processes. With your input, the council can make the best decisions possible for each neighborhood. If you have suggestions for public outreach, let us know. What is the best way for us to reach you and your neighbors, and how do you prefer to give your comments? Right now, a good way to contact us is in writing, so that we can easily pass on and retain your message. E-mail Citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov . You can also call me at 206-571-0007. Thanks. Sincerely, Kathy Hougardy Tukwila City Councilmember NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: This e-mail account is public domain. Any correspondence from or to this e-mail account is a public record. Accordingly, this e-mail, in whole or in part, may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56, regardless of any claim of confidentiality or privilege asserted by an external party. From: Laurel Humohrev To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; Jack Pace; Laura Benjamin' Nora Gierloff Subject: FW: proposed zoning changes Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 3:24:57 PM From: Diane Kitano [mailto:dianekitano@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 3:23 PM To: CityCouncil Cc: Dennis Robertson Subject: proposed zoning changes Dear City Council, My apologies for not being in attendance at the council meeting on the evening of September, 8, however, I had a prior engagement. I am writing in regards to the subject of allowing multi -housing development within single housing neighborhoods. As a long time resident of Tukwila (my family has lived here since 1975), I don't understand why this is needed. Tukwila is over 10 miles from the city of Seattle, and is a small community that happens to have a mall within its border. It has no real city center where it would be nice to be close to, and the main reason people live in this city is to be able to afford a good single family house in a decent neighborhood that is close enough to a city center that has jobs. That is the reason why I still live here. I live in a nice neighborhood. My house is affordable. I also can commute to both downtown Bellevue and downtown Seattle in a reasonable time. I live here, because my neighborhood is quiet and most of my neighbors have lived there for several years. It feels like single family houses seem to facilitate long time neighbors. Its an investment. If people invest in a place to live then they invest in the city and community. In the research that I've done, the belief that multi -family dwellings which include, duplexes, triplexes, or townhomes, do result in lower property values. Not only that, that type of dwellings tend to have residents that are NOT as invested in the community as those that live in single family homes. They tend to be more transient. Its a stepping stone in their housing situation. Is that what we want in our communities? 1 know that is not what I want in my community. I live here because we are all, for the most part, invested in our community and care about the future of our community. I know my neighbors. We look out for each other. We pitch in when there's a need. We care about what happens to this neighborhood. My husband and I choose to live here because we LOVE our neighbors and our community. If this zoning were to change, I'm not sure that this community would be what I want for where I live. Please reconsider this decision. It could have severe repercussions in which you did not intend. Thanks for listening. Concerned Long time Tukwila Resident, Diane Kitano From: Laurel Humphrey To: David Cline; Jack Pace; Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:49:01 PM From: Rusty Trudeau [mailto:rustyt@badensports.com] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:05 PM To: Puki, David J; Kathy Hougardy; 'April Chanes'; 'Brenda'; 'Ed at home; 'Judy & Terry Lund'; 'Laura Hopp'; Misiak, Sueann; 'Yvonne Trudeau'; 'Gerry Mykelbust'; Joan Hernandez Cc: Joe Duffle; Dennis Robertson; Kate Kruller; Allan Ekberg; Verna Seal; De'Sean Quinn; kjhougardy@comcast.net; kjhougardy@comcast.net; Laurel Humphrey Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Dave — Very well written. I agree with all of your points. Ironically, myself and April Chanes (also copied here) were discussing the comp. plan last night over a glass of wine with our spouses. We have both written to the Council as well with our concerns. It appears we are all on the same page as it relates to the plan. I also believe the Council representing the citizens of Tukwila know improvement is much needed in regard to how the public is notified of important issues going forward. Without identifying by name, I want to thank the people on this thread who have written and spoke up at last Tuesday's meeting. We all have a lot at stake and voicing our concerns in whatever means you have is important. Regards, Rusty Trudeau From: Puki, David J [mailto:David.J.Puki boeing.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 10:08 PM To: Kathy Hougardy <Kathy.HougardyPTukwilaWA.gov>; 'April Chanes' <april_chanesPhotmail.com>; 'Brenda' <brenda.schenckPgmail.com>; 'Ed at home' <ehougardyPcomcast.net>; 'Judy & Terry Lund' <jtklundPaol.com>; 'Laura Hopp' <danlaura7Photmail.com>; Rusty Trudeau <rustytPbadensoorts.com>; Misiak, Sueann <sueann.misiakPboeing.com>; 'Yvonne Trudeau' <yvonnetrudeauPmsn.com>; 'Gerry Mykelbust' <myke43Paol.com>; Joan Hernandez <cmjoanhPaol.com> Cc: Joe Duffie <Joe.DuffiePTukwilaWA.gov>; Dennis Robertson <Dennis.RobertsonPTukwilaWA.gov>; Kate Kruller <Kate.KrullerPTukwilaWA.gov>; Allan Ekberg <AIIan.EkbergPTukwilaWA.gov>; Verna Seal <Verna.SealPTukwilaWA.gov>; De'Sean Quinn <DeSean.QuinnPTukwilaWA.gov>; kjhougardyPcomcast.net; kjhougardvPcomcast.net; Laurel Humphrey<Laurel.HumphreyPTukwilaWA.gov> Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Hi Kathy, My major concern with the comp plan is that it still promotes higher density through rentals whether houses or apartments. With 59% of our citizens renting currently it creates other issues that cause city budget concerns. We have the third highest crime rate in the nation based on cities with our population density. We were just recently named the most dangerous city to live in the nation. The prostitution and drug scene is on the upswing on TIB again. 1 just heard Chief Flores say that dispatches are up 17% over the past 2 years primarily for medical aid. Foster Principal Pat Larsen spoke well of the problems low income students pose at school. Mary Fertakis spoke about the issues created by a transient student population. Pam Carter also spoke about the loss of community by the high rate turnover from rent& properties. These issues all contribute to the increased cost to the city. I still believe that high quality owner occupied housing is the key to making Tukwila the community of choice. Most of the people that spoke at the hearing weren't even residents. They thanked us for all that we have done to create low income and subsidized housing and how they key to our future is doing more of the same. I disagree with that idea. Maintaining lot sizes, avoiding the creation of more ADU's, not allowing mega homes (like the one next door to me) and promoting home ownership is how we can reduce costs to the city and have high quality neighborhoods. I also live within the half mile circle surrounding the transit center. There is not capacity to handle crime that occurs there now. Much less prevent it. Building more higher density rental housing surrounding it just to encourage light rail use will also increase crime. I don't feel safe walking there or parking there now. Would you feel safe going there alone after dark? But that's what is being proposed in my neighborhood. Everyone is passing this comp plan off as a high level plan with the details to be decided later. The issue here is that it lacks any substance. And I have tried to find out exactly what it means and I can't. Remember the devil is in the details. I don't want to spend my time in the future keeping an eye on the planning commission and the city council just to make sure I'm informed as to the tricks being played. That's why we elect our council members. But this vaguely worded document will require a constant vigil from concerned residents. It needs to be clear and concise in its intent. Thanks, Dave From: Kathy Hougardy[mailto:Kathy.Hougardy(aTukwilaWA.gov] Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 5:52 PM To: 'April Chanes'; 'Brenda'; 'Ed at home'; 'Judy & Terry Lund; 'Laura Hopp'; rustytCabadensports.com; Misiak, Sueann; 'Yvonne Trudeau'; 'Gerry Mykelbust'; Joan Hernandez; Puki, David 3 Cc: Joe Duffie; Dennis Robertson; Kate Kruller; Allan Ekberg; Verna Seal; De'Sean Quinn; kjhougardy(acomcast.net; kjhougardycomcast.net; Laurel Humphrey Subject: Comprehensive Plan Good Afternoon — I am writing to express my support for the current Comprehensive Plan as it stands now with the Council's changes. I'll explain why by breaking my information into topics. Each topic (called an Element) of the Comprehensive Plan has three parts: Goals — Broad statements of community aspiration, or direction, related to a section Policies — specific statements about the community's position on issues relating to land use and development in the section Implementation strategies — possible approaches to the implementation of policies in the section During its review of the Plan, the council softened the language in several key areas regarding implementation strategies, so it is clear that they are possible approaches rather than directives. This was a small but very important change. Implementation strategies should be regarded as options and are subject to a review process by Council, the Planning Commission and the Public as they are considered for adoption. There is a clear directive to preserve our stable neighborhoods in Policy 7.1.1: Policy 7.1.1: "Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single-family and stable multi family neighborhoods; eliminates incompatible land uses; and clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries." Remember this is Policy— a specific statement about the community's position on issues relating to land use and development. It emphasizes the importance of our existing single family neighborhoods, and encourages stability in the multi -family neighborhoods. The following is a review of certain parts of the plan, as they stand now: Multi family housing - apartments and condominiums: In Tukwila this is mostly rental apartments, although there are condominiums as well. There is no proposal in the Comp Plan to rezone existing residential areas to allow apartments. Regarding expansion of multi -unit housing: There is intention to create mixed-use urban -type development in the Tukwila Village, Southcenter and Tukwila Valley South areas, so the Comp Plan suggests that condos and apartments will be allowed there in the future. The plan for those areas calls for high-quality development. Affordable housing: Affordable housing could be thought of as a diverse range of housing options for a variety of income levels such as teachers, health care professionals, and single income families. Two units would be the maximum for any of these types, with the exception of cottage housing, which would be a group of smaller houses. There has been quite a bit of discussion about this, and I've heard both support and opposition from members of the community. I didn't think it would be fair to abolish any of these housing types outright in the Comp Plan without the different neighborhoods being able to have their say. Some neighborhoods may want them; some may not. Or we could just allow them in areas that are zoned for high density already. Nothing is going to happen without a public process, going through both the planning commission and the council. Later I will write about how to make sure that the wishes of our different neighborhoods are heard when the discussion is revisited. Mother -In -Law apartments: Here's more detail. In city -speak these are called accessory dwelling units, or ADUs. We have them in every neighborhood, and currently they are allowed by the Tukwila Municipal Code. However, if you look at the rules for permitted use, you will see that it's hard to meet the requirements as outlined in the code, so many of our ADUs are non -conforming. Should we continue to allow them, and if so, does the code need revision? Are there any areas where ADUs should not be allowed? These are things to consider when implementing the Comprehensive Plan. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Subsidized housing: According to the Comprehensive Plan, the place for subsidized apartment complexes will be in the areas zoned for apartments already. We have heard via the public process that some of our apartments have deplorable living conditions despite the rental inspections. The Council plans to consider an even higher level of inspection standards for these units in the near future. If an affordable housing agency is willing and able to take over one of these complexes, rehabilitate it, and manage it well, I am in full support of that. Higher quality apartments that are affordable could help people with financial issues to be more stable. This should then help with some of the issues facing our schools regarding the high turnover of students. Lot sizes: The decision to reduce lot sizes, if at all, should depend on the wishes and needs of the individual neighborhood. The Comp Plan allows us to explore this issue. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Sizes and types of single houses: The Comp Plan states that new houses built in neighborhoods should be "in harmony with the existing neighborhood." What does that mean in each neighborhood when it comes to things like the size or the set -back of a new house? This discussion will be happening within the next few years, and input from our residents is critical so that the best decision can be made for each neighborhood. Any decisions would have to go through a public processes and be approved by the council. Support for home -owners: The Comprehensive Plan also includes language to help preserve the stability of our residential neighborhoods by encouraging the City to explore providing additional resources to assist residents with home repair and maintenance, and ways to support first-time homebuyers to encourage greater rates of home ownership. Tukwila International Boulevard District on Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) The TIB District boundaries, originally established in the 1990s, have been redrawn to encompass a smaller area. The Cascade View and Riverton neighborhoods are no longer a part of the district. This is an important change. The TIB vision statement states that the district will include places to live, work, shop and play. As you travel outward from TIB in this district, the plan calls for buildings to transition in size and design to better match the character of the adjacent single family neighborhoods. Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) node The TOD node is the area within a half -mile radius of the TIB Light Rail station. The Comp Plan Policy states that this area will be designated for a more intensive, transit -oriented mix of mid- to high-rise office, multifamily residential and hospitality uses and services with structured parking. This area contains single family homes as you get further out in the half - mile radius. Conversations with staff have included the idea that the look and feel of the node will transition as you get farther away from the station, and could possibly include sidewalks and bike lanes for some of the streets with houses. No multifamily units could happen in these residential neighborhoods unless there was a rezone proposed which once again would trigger the process of going through the Planning Commission, the Council, and the Public Comment process. Conclusion As I've mention previously, all of these issues will be discussed within the next year. It is critical that the council knows your thoughts and desires in these processes. With your input, the council can make the best decisions possible for each neighborhood. If you have suggestions for public outreach, let us know. What is the best way for us to reach you and your neighbors, and how do you prefer to give your comments? Right now, a good way to contact us is in writing, so that we can easily pass on and retain your message. E-mail Citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov . You can also call me at 206-571-0007. Thanks. Sincerely, Kathy Hougardy Tukwila City Councilmember NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: This e-mail account is public domain. Any correspondence from or to this e-mail account is a public record. Accordingly, this e-mail, in whole or in part, may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56, regardless of any claim of confidentiality or privilege asserted by an external party. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; jack Pace; Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff Subject: FW: 6500 sq ft Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:40:09 AM From: patperry@comcast.net [mailto:patperry@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 12:44 AM To: CityCouncil Subject: 6500 sq ft Hello, My name is Patricia Perry, I have been a Tukwila resident since 2002. I do Not want to see lot sizes smaller then 6500 sq ft. in residential areas. I do Not want zoning changes in single family home areas. I moved out of Seattle to Tukwila because I wanted to live in a residential area that was suburb like. Thanks Patricia Perry From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: ,lack Pace; David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Beniamin Subject: Fwd: Neighborhood Planning Date: Saturday, September 12, 2015 7:51:59 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Robert Esterly <byrdman@live.com> Date: September 11, 2015 at 7:18:20 PM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Neighborhood Planning It has come to our attention that the Council is considering altering neighborhood zoning to promote duplexes, townhouses, and smaller lot sizes. My wife and I moved here nine years ago partly because of the openness of the neighborhood as well as the views. Since then it seems as though megahouses are being built in every available back yard. It seems to us as though increasing neighborhood density is already on a fast track. We are adamantly opposed to further diminishing the quality of life here in Tukwila by promoting even denser housing. And particularly reducing lot sizes. We will be hoping that the Coucil members move away from this course of action. Thank you for your attention. Robert and Jan Esterly From: Laurel Humphrey To: David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Council Members; Jack Pace; Laura Benjomin Subject: Fwd: NO for multi family housing in our neighborhood Date: Saturday, September 12, 2015 7:52:11 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Stephanie Nguyen <nstephanie799@yahoo.com> Date: September 11, 2015 at 10:15:33 PM PDT To: "citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov" <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: NO for multi family housing in our neighborhood Reply -To: Stephanie Nguyen <nstephanie799@yahoo.com.> To whom it may concern We have been living on Slade Way and 53rd Ave for years. We receive the notice of building duplexes and townhouse from a council member. We DO NOT support the idea of multi -family housing in our neighborhood due to our safety and future of our children. Thank you very much Sincerely, Stephanie Nguyen From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Jack Pace; Nora Gierioff; Laura Benjamin; David Cline Subject: FW: Tukwila comprehensive plan Date: Monday, September 14, 2015 11:17:10 AM FYI below-- I did already reply to let her know how to sign up for public comment tonight. Original Message From: Sunny Mulholland[mailto:sunnymulholland@hotmail.com.] Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 2:29 PM To: Laurel Humphrey Subject: Tukwila comprehensive plan Hi Laurel, I have many concerns about this new Tukwila comprehensive plan. I live in an area of Tukwila where there are multiple Lots that the city could possibly want to build on. Our community is all single family residential houses and a protected wetland is right next to my house. It is already not being cared for by the housing association that owns it, I am in fear that someone would try to build there and quite a few other park -like lots in my neighborhood and elsewhere throughout Tukwila. The areas near my home are areas with many raccoons, hawks, possums, many different kinds of birds, squirrels, etc, even coyotes and beavers! I worry about any building anywhere that displaces/kills wildlife and cuts down trees and decimates forests in Tukwila, which is one of the only Puget Sound areas that still has quite a bit of trees and lots full of animals and beautiful native plants and trees. This is why many Tukwila residents moved here in the first place! Please consider other options than building multiple family dwellings in Tukwila single family dwelling neighborhoods. It is unfair to us, as well as very dangerous to the native animals and leaves Tukwila with less trees, which is no good for anyone, we need them to breathe!! Keep Tukwila neighborhoods full of trees and green spaces. Please only consider low-income housing at Tukwila Village or in areas where there are already multi -family dwellings. Can I sign up to speak at the September 14th Council meeting? Sincerely, a proud and concerned Tukwila resident, Sunny Mulholland 13731 44th Ave S. Tukwila, WA 98168 206-697-6246 Sent from my iPhone From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Jack Pace; David Cline; Nora Gierloff; Laura Benjamin Subject: Fwd: changes in the /comprehensive Plan Date: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:06:58 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Hubert & Bobi Crawley <bearzz@comcast.net> Date: September 13, 2015 at 7:36:30 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: changes in the /comprehensive Plan The City should not be considering changes in the current 6,500 square foot lot sizing UNLESS they are going to increase the square footage. Multi -family housing should NOT to allowed in single family housing. We already have too many families living in a single family house in many parts of the City. We just don't enforce this part of the housing code. When the lot sizing is reduced large houses are still built, resulting in more on street parking, higher density of occupancy, less landscaping that makes a city livable, and heavier traffic on our street that were built for lighter parking loads. In many parts of the City it is presently dangerous for emergency vehicles to traverse the streets due to parked cars. If it is the desire of the City Council to increase the number of people in a living unit, then they need to increase the height limitations in allowed zoning to afford developers to build higher quality buildings of greater height. Lets not destroy our family housing areas to reward a few developers or citizens to make more money. Lets keep Tukwila a family friendly area. Decreasing the square footage and allowing multi -family housing in a single family area will not accomplish your goal. Hubert Crawley 14710 58th ave s Retired City Fire Chief/former member the the City's Subdivision Committee From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin; David Cline; )ack Pace; Nora Gierloff Subject: FW: lot size reduction Date: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:45:23 PM From: Dave Larson [mailto:davidvlarson@msn.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:29 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: lot size reduction Dear Council Members, I'm unable to attend tonight's meeting do to a family commitment. I would like to clarify my comments from the last meeting and add some thoughts about this lot size reduction proposal that I did not include at the last meeting. I referenced the Tree Canopy Survey and the Rental Housing Survey. I am guessing that the intent of these surveys was to preserve something that could be lost if we don't protect them. If this is the case, why are we not wanting to protect our residential single family homes. If lot sizes are reduced trees will be removed and greenspace will be reduced dramatically. The issue is proposed as an affordable housing problem. The cost of purchasing a house in Tukwila already varies greatly with the exceptions being housing affordable to families making minimum wage and possibly families making a lot more than the area median income (Rich people) as I noted in the last meeting. This was pointed out in the Committee of the Whole meeting on August 24th in a chart on page 5. Making lot sizes smaller will not help or attract either of these groups. A better solution is to steal from the rich and give to the poor. Maybe steal is the wrong word but my point is we're not solving any problems by lowering the lot size. Housing costs are still based on supply and demand and Tukwila is a high demand area do to proximity of jobs, shopping, entertainment etc. I've also heard that we want to cram as many people as we can into smaller size lots to protect our farmlands. This idea is also intended to pit my need for food against my greed for a larger lot. It was stated in the last meeting that a city most grow to survive. Grow how? More people, more industry, more shopping, more restaurants. I suspect that at some time Tukwila will look like Seattle and Seattle will, of course, be more dense yet. My point is that at some time in the distant future the earth will be maxed out and the world will be in chaos. Watched the news lately. It's started already. Let's talk about the real problem. Its cars. Finding places to park them, clogging freeways at peak times and screwing up the environment are a few of the precise problems. Seattle and Washington State Officials want people to use mass transit to solve the car issue. That's the real issue in a nutshell. If we create more living opportunities close to work this problem will go away. I think not. Look at the major cities in China for example. Chaos. The car problem in Seattle can be stopped by not allowing cars in Seattle. This may hurt commerce. So instead we'll just refuse to fix freeway congestion until people get tired of sitting in traffic. Doesn't seem to be working so far. If Seattle closed only the exits and entrances that enter and exit from the inside left lanes and made the left lanes Seattle bypass lanes maybe congestion would be somewhat lessened and the bottleneck down to two lanes would become three at Seneca St. Make the express lanes one lane each way and now northbound is four a lane bottleneck instead of two. Require people that work in downtown to ride transit and provide better means to your workplace and at least we're putting a dent in the real problem. How will dividing our lots in two help this problem. It will not. You have to force people out of their cars instead of adding more people with more cars. I also noticed in the minutes of the City Council of the Whole August 24th that lowering the front property line set back might be something to think about. Comment was made that new construction could be made homonymous with existing structures this way. The current set back of 20 feet just allows enough room to park a car. Current buildings that are less than 20 feet are considered legal nonconforming. As I remember, these buildings cannot be added onto in a way that will increase the nonconformity. This idea also reduces open space and will greatly disrupt our living environment and force our streets to be clogged with even more cars. In closing I'd like to make this point. As a society, we need to start solving problems directly instead of trying to solve problems by forcing failure somewhere else. Common sense 101. Thanks for your time. Dave Larson !4244 55th Av S. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: David Cline; )ack Pace; Nora Gierloff; Laura Beniamin Subject: FW: Multi -family housing in Tukwila Date: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:13:05 PM From: turbocodr@gmail.com [mailto:turbocodr@gmail.com] On Behalf Of John Conwell Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:10 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: Mufti -family housing in Tukwila Dean City Council members, I have recently become aware of an initiative (or inquiry for an initiative) to propose multi- family homes in Tukwila neighborhoods. The reasons, as I was told, was to provide housing for low income residents, as defined by households that earn less than $20,000 per year, as well as reduce the transient nature of students in Tukwila schools by providing a more stable and affordable housing environment. Setting aside the historical negative impact of introducing multi -family housing will have on property values of single family neighborhoods, the financial considerations behind this theory doesn't make sense. Duplexes and townhouses will not provide an affordable housing option for the target demographic your talking about. If you take the long held rule of thumb of spending 30% of your annual income on housing, a family that makes $20K per year, should spend approximately $500 per month on housing. And if you look at rental prices of duplexes, they generally run around the same as a two bedroom apartment in that area. There is no way people are going to be able to rent a duplex for $500 per month, let alone a townhouse. This also doesn't address the transient nature of these families, and their affects on the classroom. These families will not be able to purchase these proposed residences. They will still be renting them. You don't purchase half a duplex. You purchase the whole house, then rent one or both sides out to another family. So in the end, this demographic would still have to rent, and at a price bracket that they couldn't even attain. The only affect introducing multi -family housing will have on single family neighborhoods will be driving down the property values (there are multiple sources available online, I can provide them if needed). Thank you for listening to my voice on this matter John Conwell From: Laura Benjamin To: Laurel Humphrey Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan Update- Council Discussion 9/14 Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 1:41:02 PM FYI. I believe this was only sent to my email. From: Stephanie Nguyen [mailto:nstephanie799@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 1:26 PM To: Laura Benjamin Subject: Re: Comprehensive Plan Update- Council Discussion 9/14 Dear Ms. Benjamin CC: Council Members I had the opportunity to attend the council meeting last night to learn more about the Comprehensive Plan and the more involvement I had, I definitely don't want to support the multi -housing plan either affordable housing, townhouse, duplex or subsidized housing might be built in our neighborhood. Last night, we also learned about a proposal for building affordable housing at Beacon Hill and Tukwila border, which would definitely create safety issues if it comes a long. Please don't look at the promised benefits of the proposal bring in as being said such as small business opportunities which will create more jobs for the community, public library, etc. PLEASE DON'T MAKE IT HAPPEN IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. I have been working in White Center and Burien for over 12 years in multi -housing areas. The criminal rates and damages have been increased dramatically each year. Our office windows were broken many times; businesses and the KC Library had burglary several times in a month. Car vandalized, car keyed and graffiti sprayed all over none profit agency offices repeatedly. There are drug dealers around, kids smoke illegal drugs in the library bathrooms, women were robbed when walking alone on the street during daytime, shooting and gangs. There are security officers patrol every night but things are still happening which make the residents worried and feel unsafe living in this complicated neighborhood. We definitely don't want our neighborhood becomes a second White Center. Our single family properties have been protected very well with less criminal rates and we take care of our properties so Tukwila would be a beautiful and safe city to live in. We love Tukwila and we want it to be the best place to live. We do support the neighborhood improvement which will bring the benefit to City of Tukwila, but please do not bring in the complication of the multi -housing which will cause an unhealthy living environment for the residents. We do appreciate the Council Members for listening our comments and concerns. Respectfully, Stephanie Nguyen On Monday, September 14, 2015 4:40 PM, Laura Benjamin <Laura.Benjamint TukwilaWA.gov> wrote: From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: aack Pace; David Cline; Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff Subject: Fwd: Council Meeting 14 September 2015, Comprehensive Plan Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 10:35:13 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: William C.Holstine <holstine123@comcast.net> Date: September 17, 2015 at 10:17:51 AM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Cc: <Mayor@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Council Meeting 14 September 2015, Comprehensive Plan To: Joe Duffy Allan Ekberg Kathy Hougardy Kate Kruller CC: Jim Haggerton Dennis Robertson Verna Seal De' Sean Quinn Subject: Council Meeting 14 September 2015 I have recently attended a few Council meetings, attended the Joint DCD, Council and Planning Commission Meeting and a Planning Commission Public Meeting, but I never became aware of the intent of the `Explore Provision contained in the draft copy of the proposed Comprehensive Plan. It simply never came up till Councilman Robertson called it to my and others attention. I understand the angst of some Council members over learning that the residents of Tukwila, were not aware of the intent of the `explore' provision, outside of policy authority, for potential residential rezoning contained in the draft comprehensive plan. The angst gives the appearance of the skids being greased to enable selective rezoning for higher residential densities anywhere, anyplace, anytime without due process based solely on a onetime vote by the Council via authorization of the plan. Learning about the explore provision definition even in the eleventh hour of the deliberative process is far better than to so learn after the genie is out of the bottle. That's the crux of the exploration idea, once the higher density structure is erected in a community, you know, like the genie, it is out of the bottle and there to stay. No one is going to tear it down or move it if the exploration proves unfeasible. Regardless of the timing of Councilman Robertson's flyer or the resultant angst expressed by some council members, I think it might have been his finest hour as witness the community outpouring at subject meeting and the unanimity therein expressed against higher singe family residential community densities and the explore provision. Therefore, maybe it is unfortunate the remaining communities didn't receive the flyer which might have satisfied the City's Community Outreach effort. Now more outreach effort appears necessary, if indeed the explore provision continues to be entertained as strategy and not policy. Some Council members may think Tukwila is a single community and when it comes to governance they are correct and taking that thought a bit further, if explore were to be used in that same context and voted on in that same context, it could be applied anywhere anyplace anytime in our city. Council members change from time to time and the interpretation and use of the explore provision, since it is a strategy and not in the policy section of the Plan, could change therefore making its use universal in our city and grant cart blanch rezoning within our residential communities without any Council action. Council members represent their constituents who elect them and as an adjunct thereto you provide a desirable friendly business climate in which businesses may flourish and thereby fill the revenue coffers of the City. You might even provide some incentives if necessary to attract specific businesses but you do not directly represent business nor cede any turf thereto, only a friendly business climate and cheerleading therefor. I get the feeling, and I hope I am wrong, that special interests is on the City's doorstep turning the knob to enter and that is where the Council must draw the line over which special interest must not be allowed to cross. The explore provision represents that DO NOT CROSS LINE. Any exploration of residential rezoning for higher densities within single family home communities must be on a case-by-case basis with step-by-step review and approval by the City Council, with affected community consultation, from beginning to end without exceptions and be embodied in the policy section of the Plan. To do otherwise as witness the citizen comments during subject meeting is too controversial, invites mischief, cedes policy making to non elected entities and must not be allowed. Therefore, delete the `explore' provision as an implementing strategy from the Plan and the problem is solved, and the Council retains its policy making authority for which it was elected. Bill Holstine PS: please enter this E-mail into the record. From: Laura Beniamin To: Laurel Humphrey; Nora Gierloff; jack Pace; Melissa Hart Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan Update - Council Discussion 9/21 Date: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:44:52 AM To be included in the record for tonight's Regular Meeting. From: TSmith [mailto:Tsmith@cottagesnw.com] Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 7:16 PM To: Laura Benjamin Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Update - Council Discussion 9/21 Several comments to this plan. 1. City shouldn't lower square foot lot size unless the community gets something such as net zero energy consumption. Why should we allow private or public swimming pools without requiring passive solar energy on site to heat water. Why should the community foot the bill so the person who can afford pool they can afford solar. If the city increases density important point is higher energy and carbon production. What is missing is to lower carbon and energy use while increasing density. 2. It sure would be appropriate to reinstate previous cottage housing developments. There is only one that was unable to complete the process because the Architect of record was fired for producing a passive solar house using 80% glass on south face furthermore the glazing lacked proper shading. Thus the inhabitants would have cooked. Science and modern architecture recommends 40-50% solar glazing on south face with proper shading. That is inconsolable. I have significant money invested while the plans were rated the best of the three developments it is nearly complete and shovel ready if I can continue the process without having to start over. Honestly I would be willing to drop one of the houses to 8 units to get an easier short plat permit. It should be noted that my design integrated rain gardens and wetland garden into the design. Plus active and passive solar energy plus conservation techniques of 8" wall and 10" roof insulation. I included entrance air locks and was designing passive air conditioning during warmer weather. My concern and my design increased density while protecting privacy under the caveat to reduce energy use of the residence, which in turn benefits the community. Thank you Todd Smith, CEO Cooke. Riverside Properties LLC. PO Box 97193 Tacoma, WA 98497 www.cottagesnw.com tsmithPcottagesnw.com 253-691-8191 From: Laura Benjamin[mailto:Laura.BenjaminthTukwilaWA.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 9:02 AM To: Rebecca Fox Subject: Comprehensive Plan Update - Council Discussion 9/21 Comprehensive Plan Update City Council Discussion on the Housing and Residential Neighborhoods Elements September 21, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Tukwila City Hall —Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Monday, September 21, 2015 — Council will continue discussing language in the Housing and Residential Neighborhoods elements as well as the Land Use Map Legend of the Comprehensive Plan regarding development in single-family neighborhoods. Review materials: See the draft elements at http://www.tukwilawa.gov/dcd/dcdcompplan.html, under the "Meetings & Events" tab. The draft Housing Element is also available here, the draft Residential Neighborhoods Element is available here, and the draft Land Use Map Legend is available here.. Materials are also available at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100; Tukwila, WA 98188. For more information: Contact Laura Benjamin at 206-433-7166, or at CompPlanUpdate@TukwilaWA.gov You are receiving this email because you have expressed interest in the Comprehensive Plan update. From: Laurel Humohrey To: Council Members Cc: ,lack Pace; Nora Gierloff; David Cline; Laura Beniamin Subject: Fwd: Wash. Growth Management Act Date: Monday, September 21, 2015 8:57:11 AM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: Peter Okicich <paokicich@comcast.net> Date: September 20, 2015 at 10:31:57 AM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Wash. Growth Management Act Tukwila City Council, First, we appreciate the opportunity to attend council meetings and add our comments regarding agenda items. But we would like better communications to the neighborhoods regarding upcoming agenda items, especially those that may affect our property values. Right now it is a five-step process: 1] Open City of Tukwila web site. 2] Select city council agenda. 3) Select page 2. 4] Select meeting date. 5] Select complete agenda packet. This might be fine for the computer literate, but how many working families have the time or inclination to do so? And then there are those without computers. How about snail -mail, with its attendant costs notwithstanding, as a way to better communicate with all residents. Incidentally, when visiting the "Maps Directory" there is not a copy of the map that shows the neighborhoods the Council often mentions. I.e. McMicken, Thorndyke, Tukwila Hill, Riverton Foster, Cascade View, Foster Point, Allentown, Duwamish & Ryan Hill. Perhaps an enlarged copy on display in the Council chambers would help. Especially for newer residents to Tukwila. Regarding the Washington Growth Management Act bill under consideration could you remove all language pertinent to and including lot sizes and rezoning? We feel it was unnecessary and unprofessional to publicly chastise Councilman Robertson. This could have been accomplished in the privacy of your chambers. We appreciate all the hard work and the time you give to our community. Peter & Gael Okicich (residents since 1969) 14248 56th Avenue S. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: Laura Benjamin;,lack Pace; Nora Gierloff; David Cline Subject: FW: smaller lots in single family zones Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:31:28 AM From: snuffysmith888@comcast.net [mailto:snuffysmith888@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:28 AM To: CityCouncil Subject: smaller lots in single family zones Today I learned the city is "exploring" changes to the zoning that would allow smaller lot sizes and the addition of duplexes and townhomes in single family areas. We have lived in Tukwila for 20 years and am against broad changes to single family neighborhood zoning. From: Laurel Humphrey To: Council Members Cc: )ack Pace; Laura Benjamin; David Cline; Nora Gierloff Subject: Fwd: Comp Plan deliberations - housing element Date: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:28:01 PM Sent from mobile. Begin forwarded message: From: <kat y.stetson@gmail.com> Date: September 24, 2015 at 1:27:25 PM PDT To: <citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comp Plan deliberations - housing element I have lived in Tukwila for more than 40 years. When I moved here I was a parent of one toddler with one on the way. At that time my family was interested in living in a single-family home with a large yard and we were happy to find what fit our needs that we could afford here in Tukwila. Time passed and the children grew up and left home. I found myself single and needing a rental house, which I was fortunate to find again in Tukwila. It suited my needs and was affordable to me. I was then able to purchase a condominium, again in Tukwila. It suits my current needs. I can envision a time in the not -to - distant future that my needs for housing will once again change. I am likely to again become a renter, leaving maintenance responsibilities to the landlord who I pay rent to. The point of all this is to say that not everyone today who lives in Tukwila WANTS or NEEDS to live in a single-family residence. Contrary to testimony given on Monday night's Council meeting, it is not everyone's ultimate desire to live in an "owner -occupied" single family residence. For lots of reasons, that may not fit their needs. Tukwila needs to look to the future of the City and plan for housing for ALL its residents, in all their stages of life. This means variety, choice, options - owner -occupied single family, townhouse, duplex, triplex, four-plex, apartments, stand-alone rental house or ADU. All are viable options for housing and all should be represented here in our community. This is not to say that we throw out zoning regulations and allow mufti -family apartment houses plopped into the middle of the LDR zone. But it may mean smaller minimum lot sizes that would encourage thoughtful infill. I completely disagree with the characterization of rental property residents as causing increased crime and calls for service. This is simply not proven in any meaningful way by statistics and facts. This is FEAR talking. Owner -occupied housing is not necessarily the solution to whatever problems our community is facing. We cannot afford to look "back" to the way things were 20, 30, 40 or more years ago. Those days are gone. You must look forward, with clear eyes at the reality of our community today and plan for THAT future. We are rapidly changing and in order to continue to be a viable community, we need to ensure that ALL our citizens have housing that suits THEIR needs. Thank you for letting me weigh in. Kathy From: Laura Beniamin To: Christy 0"Flaherty; Melissa Hart; Laurel Humohrev Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan Update - Council Discussion 9/28 Date: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:37:33 AM Attachments: image003.onq To be included in the record for 9/28 C.O.W. From: hamdi [mailto:hamdi@syouthclub.org] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:57 PM To: Laura Benjamin Cc: Rebecca Fox Subject: Re: Comprehensive Plan Update - Council Discussion 9/28 Thank you for updating us Laura. Now that we are really learning because we are part of the learning community we want to use more clearer language that can specify the needs of each community. For example Housing opportunities should exist for all incomes and lifestyles throughout the county and with the balanced transportation system access to employment is convenient and reliable. Innovation in the development of a diverse range of housing types is fundamental in accommodating population growth. A diversity in housing types will allow residents to stay within their community as their housing needs change (H4-13). I would add this language: -All new housing constructions must have bed rooms that are proportionate to the area community family size (From studio to 4 bedrooms) to avoid the continuation of the existing substandard living conditions and crowded apartments. We appreciate your hard work! Hamdi Abdulle I Executive Director I Somali Youth & Family Club Office: 425-207-8297 I www.syouthclub.org 19550 International Blvd #B106 SeaTac, WA 98188 --- Laura.Benjamin@TukwilaWA.gov wrote: From: Laura Benjamin <Laura.Benjamin@TukwilaWA.gov> To: Rebecca Fox <Rebecca.Fox@TukwilaWA.gov> Subject: Comprehensive Plan Update - Council Discussion 9/28 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:28:30 +0000 Comprehensive Plan Update City Coun+ it Discussion on the Housing and Residential Neighborhoods fiery nts September 28, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Tukwila City Hall — Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Monday, September 28, 2015 — Council will continue discussing language in the Housing, Residential Neighborhoods, and Tukwila International Boulevard District elements as well as the Land Use Map Legend of the Comprehensive Plan regarding development in single-family neighborhoods. Review materials: See the draft elements at http://www.tukwilawa.gov/dcd/dcdcompplan.html, under the "Meetings & Events" tab. Materials are also available at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100; Tukwila, WA 98188. For more information: Contact Laura Benjamin at 206-433-7166, or at CompPlanUpdate@TukwilaWA.gov You are receiving this email because you have expressed interest in the Comprehensive Plan update. From: Laurel Humphrey To: David Cline; Laura Benjamin; Nora Gierloff; )ack Pace Subject: FW: Comments on Comprehensive Plan Update from M. P. Willoughby Date: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:04:47 PM From: emilya57Ca comcast.net [emilya57@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 1:32 PM To: Joe Duffie; Allan Ekberg; Kathy Hougardy; Kate Kruller; De'Sean Quinn; Dennis Robertson; Verna Seal Subject: Comments on Comprehensive Plan Update from M. P. Willoughby "Policy 3.1.2 Work with residents and property owners to consider housing options that meet "current and future needs" {(What are current and future needs?) First, what is the motive for changing the situation today "current needs?" What is expected if we change? Future needs connotes something be conjured to make a future template we use garnered from the very best evidence available now, and then make a projection onto the future.} Implementation Strategy -- Develop and implement an outreach program to receive public input from residents and property owners regarding housing development in residential neighborhoods. Outreach may include but is not limited to: citywide and neighborhood specific mailings, online and in-person surveys, flyers, open houses and other events. Implementation Strategy -- Following the public input process, consider flexible standards, {There is no such thing as a flexible standard) to promote housing options that meet current and future needs. Establish parameters for design characteristics such as height, lot coverage, home design features, and setbacks." {Having to ask what the meaning is connotes the problem has not been thought through. Reconsider real options} {I suspect your community outreach is satisfactory. Following the law about public notice to the community is adequate. Particularly when supplemented by public communications such as the Hazel Nut and notes from the school. I suspect the Council has allowed the city bureaucracy to handle the whole process without taking an early hand in the development. The Council needs to get their hands dirty and grab onto this project up to their elbows. The work is undone.} (Something that might help in the future is careful wording today to head off the controversy in the future. I.e., changes to items x,y,z must be brought to the attention of the community by doing a,b,c. Lest you worry, I know a category of words borders on binding future Legislatures and is not defendable. However, triggering some action doesn't inhibit future legislatures.) 0 lo-% Dear Tukwila City Council Members, I attended the last Monday night Council meeting and the discussion on the Comprehensive Plan reminded me of Planning Commission meetings. Developers presenting the accolades of their development to the Planning Commissioners. The issue at hand is about the Low Density Residential (LDR) district and not a specific project. I was disappointed that those involved with the Methodist Church project redevelopment consumed so much time that I was not able to stay for the entire meeting. Another time consumer was audience testimony that was unrelated to council business. It is commendable that you are willing to listen and respond to anyone and especially when sensitive matters are brought to the podium. The meeting was not the norm and may have been better served if the focus was kept to council business when public testimony not related to council business consumes so much of the council meeting. I can also choose to drive by myself and stay longer. There were some interesting comments by the proponents of the Methodist Church project. Cottage home projects tend to focus on orientation of the units in a fashion that promotes a sense of community between the occupants. Typically the units face a center courtyard and are similar in size. The same sense of community should be protected in the LDR neighborhoods. We need to be cautious when modifying LDR zone parameters. Another point that came out was the actual affordability of cottage homes. The architect stated that their target cliental was between 60 and 80% of area median income earners. The proponents of this project would not commit to serving lower income earners. This coupled with family size limitations narrows cottage home applicability to a small portion of our population. A student speaker stated that she had a large family and needed more room desperately. Developers can't build profitable small homes unless they are clumped together in a development. The architect stated that it would be advantageous to build cottage homes combining units sharing common walls. You council members eliminated duplexes and townhomes in LDR zones from the comp plan. The density of cottage homes per acre is consistent with our Medium Density Residential (MDR) zoning. The proposed changes to the comprehensive plan have been narrowed to exploring allowing detached accessory dwellings in the LDR zone and increasing density in neighborhoods on a case by case basis. These proposals will be accomplished by changing the definition of LDR zoning. Wouldn't the appropriate method be to change the zone designation of the neighborhood involved to MDR? Especially where increasing the dwellings per acre. I assume this process would be more difficult. I also believe this process requires community outreach and input. It seems as though we are trying to reinvent the wheel when the existing wheel works fine. If the MDR designation is too broad then maybe we should create a new MDR -2 zone instead of redefining LDR. This would still require a zone change and process would be followed. Allowing detached accessory dwellings in the LDR zone does not come without pitfalls. Currently, attached accessory dwellings are allowed with several stipulations. The main residence must be owner occupied. A past DCD Director told me that this provision was unenforceable. To date, this is still not enforced. To enforce this provision would require continuous monitoring and occasional eviction measures. As a building inspector, I found that a landlord could buy an owner occupied house and convert a portion to an accessory dwelling and collect two rents making the purchase highly profitable. I believe that not enforcing the owner occupancy provision is slowly eroding our owner occupied homes. Allowing detached accessory homes in the LDR neighborhoods, if limited in size, will be like adding a single cottage home without regard to community orientation. If an increased size is allowed, is this any different than substantially reducing lot sizes? Again, isn't this why we have the MDR zone? On a different subject, our rental program was discussed and it appears that the city is spending a lot of time and expense monitoring all rentals in an effort to correct problems normally associated with slum lords. While at a seminar during my employment with the Tukwila Building Department, I had lunch with the Head of the Code 1 Enforcement Department of Minneapolis. They struggled with the same issue. To keep this short, their solution was to write citations based on unresolved problems and complaints and routed these citations through property tax bills. To do this required legislation at the state level. If the landlord did not pay his taxes then he could be ousted from ownership of the property. She (Head of Code Enforcement) stated that this program has been a huge success and slum lords have been substantially reduced. Rental owners keep their properties in code compliance to stay out of this program. She also stated that this program has substantially reduced their work load. This may be an important political action to lobby for at our state government. I hope that you as a council will draft regulation that is enforceable, encourages a balance between owner occupied housing and rentals, maintains community orientation in all residential zones and does not encourage conversion of owner occupied housing to rental property. We all like our voices heard and if any of you would like to share this email with your email lists or any other residents, you have my permission. Dave Larson 14244 55 Ave. S Tukwila, Wa. 98168 206-799-7892 Vee, Linda From: Watanabe, Anne Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:27 PM To: Vee, Linda Subject: FW: PSF Mechanical Staff Report Attachments: AttachmentBl_CoverSheet.pdf; AttachmentB2_SitePlan.pdf; AttachmentB3_Elevation.pdf; AttachmentB4_Lanscape.pdf; STAFF_REPORT_PSFMechanicaipdf; AttachmentA_AerialPhoto.docx; AttachmentC_CUPcriteria.pdf; AttachmentD_Comments.pdf Linda, Here is another Tukwila file to be set up — the hard copies of the attachments are in the mail to us, so we don't need to print them out. The hearing is next Tuesday at 2. Thanks. Anne From: Max Baker[mailto:Max.Baker(aTukwilaWA.gov] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:12 PM To: Watanabe, Anne Cc: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: PSF Mechanical Staff Report Hello Anne, Attached is the staff report regarding the PSF Mechanical building at 11621 E. Marginal Way S., Tukwila, WA 98168. Along with the report are the following attachments: • A: Aerial photo • B: Site plan • C: Applicant response to CUP criteria • D: Comments from Valley View Sewer District We have had no public comments at this point and have reflected this in our report. We will plan to see you at 2:00 pm on Thursday, February 11th Please let me know if you have any questions or comments before then. Best, Maxwell Baker Planning Intern City of Tukwila Max.Baker@tukwilawa.gov tukwilawa.gov (206) 431-3662 The City of opportunity, the community of choice. MEMORANDUM www.tukwila@tukwilawa.gov Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Max Baker, Planner 400/71 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer david.mcpherson@tukwilawa.gov DATE: January 9, 2014 SUBJECT: PSF Gateway 11621 East Marginal Way South TL no. 102304-9044 Conditional Use and Miscellaneous Comments Conditional Use Permit — L13-0051 Public Works has no comments. Miscellaneous Comments 1. Public Works will determine the amount due for any Transportation Impact Fee due under a future Building permit. 2. A Transportation Impact Fee may apply to the future Building permit. Credit will be given for the previous use of the building. The Transportation Impact Fee will be based on any new PM peak hour trips. Please provide as much information as available for the new use of this building. Number of Employees, business hours, and work hours of employees. Provide new Office Area square footage and new Warehouse Area square footage. Provide existing Office Area square footage and existing Warehouse Area square footage. 3. A Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application and Test Fee will apply for any change of use. 4. Public Works will determine if a Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application is required and if a Traffic Concurrency Test Fee is due under a future Building permit. Page 1 of 1 January 3, 2014 Mr. Bruce Stock 109 Bell St. Seattle, WA 98121 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Subject: 113-0051: Conditional Use Permit for PSF Mechanical offices in MIC/L zone Dear Mr. Stock: Your application for a Conditional Use Permit for the PSF Mechanical office building at 11621 East Marginal Way S. in Tukwila is considered complete on January 3, 2014, for the purposes of meeting the state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. I will be contacting you soon to discuss dates for the Public Hearing and the notice requirements. A public notice has to be provided within 14 days of this letter. The city will coordinate the postcard mailing and the notice board posting. However you need to make payment directly to Fast Signs in the amount of $365. Fast Signs is located the Springbrook Business Park at 7825 S. 180th Street in Kent and their phone number is (206) 575-2110. You will need to provide site address and file number to Fast Signs. Your file number is L13-0051. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (206) 431-3662. Sincerely, Maxwell Baker max.baker@TukwilaWA.Gov DCD Planning Intern cc. L13-0051 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L13-0051 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building 1❑1 Planning Public Works Fire Dept. 1❑1 Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: Conditional Use Permit for PSF mechanical offices in MIC/H zone Address: 11621 East Marginal Way S Date transmitted: 12/27/2013 Response requested by: Jan 10th, 2013 Staff coordinator: Max Baker Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: Comments prepared by: Update date: TO: Minnie, Stacy FROM: Barbara DATE: December 11, 2013 RE: Unisys Corporation Enclosed are copies of business license applications for 2006 and 2007. In 2005 they were only licensed at 200 APE (service and repair of PCs). 2006 was the first year they were licensed on East Marginal Way. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188-2599 206-433-1800 This is an APPLICATION ONLY, r You must obtain a business li (J, ALL LICENSES Eh, ._ Application for 2006 City Business License TUKWILA W FILL OUT THIS FORM IN ITS ENTIRETY OMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED - --4i i f husiness. nr'isys C Business License: II RENEWAL Ctfr1 EW Application L.,,... g/ SJ's fayNoration 419424 Business Name tib.. 4 1, . / Local Street C' % p i) Corporate Address, if different from local: t ,: .J.(%\ 5 i J a , r e 4.--- ) y` 1`" -I-f -' 7 I`h ( a o ` orporate Phone: ( ) Lam' - . Address i / Gt:/0U (Be sure to include zip /i CO code + 9 -digit extension i ) / / Local PO box & zip,if applica (/fir / - 6 i & PP Business Phone (incl. area code): ( ) Ift If business name has changed in past year, list to er name. Planning: Zoning designation: y Indicate ownership status: ❑ In ividual • Partnership ■ LLC [rporation ❑ Non-profit Local manager (include name and home phone): 4-14 u..,- 6 00 l LH Original opening date of business in Tukwila: List owners/partners/ officers: Title a Address City/State/Zip Phone Date of Birth --e------ CA-A4Cq. LI) - IS YOUR Door-to-door solicitation/peddler? CTNo ■ Yes BUSINESS: Contractor based outside City? Cil No • Yes If "Yes'; show jobsite address in space plow Operated from your Tukwila residence? L7 No ❑ Yes If "Yes'; read information on reverse side and sign Any gambling and/or gambling devices on premises? D - go • Yes Any amusement devices on premises? • Yes If "Yes", number of devices: Description of business (give details; also, /- y ') • r list types of products sold or stored): Will retai sales be conducted? e o Size of floor space used: s ft. q• Number of available parking spaces: Total employees at Tukwila location, ' owners ansi managers: a/ ii Full-time: Part-time: eluding Number of employees in each type of employment: Office: Retail: Wholesale: Manufacturing: Warehousing: Other: lo,you use/store/discharge flammable, hazardous, or biohazardous materials? No ■ Yes If "Yes", state type and quantity: Local Emergency Contacts: Phone 1. 2. Is your business activity - or any portions of your building - different than the previous use of this building/space? 2 -No ■ Yes If YES, please provide description. (Use separate sheet, if necessary) Are you PRESENTLY DOING (or PLANNING TO DO) any: Construction, remodeling, or installation of commercial storage racks? eo • Yes Installation of new signage or changes in existing signage? Elo ■ Yes --> If Presently Doing List Permit Numbers: If Planning To Do: Contact the City of Tukwila's Permit Center regarding permit requirements PRIOR TO STARTING. IF RENEWAL-* Show 2005 City of Tukwila Business License No.: NEW OR RENEWAL -11- (Read CTR information on reverse side) No. of CTR "affected employees" at the site for which this business license application is filed: If you are a new building owner or planning to sell a building - please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side OFFICE USE Date: 3 ; C / ONLY Received by: - 5 Paid: Cash 10 eeck No./ •' ( 0 , Receipt No.: 1 j I -31 Budding: ` -- Planning: Zoning designation: y • Building/si ermit attached Polly ,` '00 "lr Fire.q‘.--- Date issued: 7 _,.rte 1 ( `/ 2006 License No.: j L ` 0 3 Y- 9-_ WA State Sales Tax # it -01 0 O ,It 3e or UBI number (9 digits): V I certify the information contained herein is correct. l.un= - tand that y untrue statement - ' c • or re y, ation of my license. Signature. ' ,.-e)(ri.--e-y PI Name: -Th o rn-S G . ".«--seceil Title/Office: _ % 65 / S`C' et_ee7i►2,`r' LICENSE FEE (based on number of employees) CHECK CHECK ONE f z -v Please return completed application with fee to Tukwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention: City Clerk's Office 61.E ❑ 0 to 5 p'G fo 100 $1"00.0 ; ❑ 101. and above 7V2 -0 -070 -0 --- City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188-2599 206-433-1800 e This is an APPLICATION ONLY, a, NCy You must obtain a business licenses . '17 ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEivu . . Application for 2006 ("4" Rusiness License w TUKWILA w NTIRETY PTED LinisYs ' 04 SYs ° orako Wn Blue Ba ell p, 18424 If you are a new building owner or planning to sell a building - please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side Date: , 8 Lid NEW ,• Application Date: j Paid: Cash Business License: ■ RENEWAL Receipt No.: 3 1 c Business ..a .r: Local Street ■I w r• ..,, • Address 7/(002 / i1:' .. fI et, r 4, 0 .SCit (Be sure to include zrp , , 7 . i code + 4 -digit extension) i tiG (t a tt r { f.((, % Q i / L' _ i, Local PO box & zip, if applicable u ! t00 •.rporate Address, if diff rent from local: A - } a '^^ • I ,( `"— (),- -(. o.,--.,- it 1 5 Coo (U, 1.46 ✓ -. A. t- -- w YL S - Business Phone (incl. area code): (r, ) j -4' Corporate Phone: ( ) If business name has changed in pastayear, list ormer name. 4/ -f' -- 7 G0 0 Indicate ownership status: ❑ D-ebrporation Individual ■ Partnership Non-profit ■ LLC • Local manager (include name and home phone): Original opening date of business in Tukwila: List owners/partners/ officers: ?(f--<_ c.C,--k4 Title ; Home Address City/State/Zip Phone Date of Birth 4'\-F IS YOUR Door-to-door solicits ion/peddler?o BUSINESS: Contractor based outside City? If "Yes', show jobsite address Operated from your Tukwila residence? If "Yes'; read information on • Yes Any gambling -0'No Any amusement _o and/or gambling devices on premises? on premises? If "Yes", number of devices: 31 No • Yes ■ Yes in space el w devices ail No • Yes reverse side and sign • Yes Description of business (give details; also, Iist<types of products sold or stored): % { ,,, //%J l tA. l iC.1 . / Will retail sales be con ucted? Yes ( No f i ✓EE'Q Size of floor space used: sq. ft. Number of available parking spaces. Total employees at Tukwila location, including owners and managers: Full-time: ,j Part-time: Number of employees in each type of employment: Office: Retail: Wholesale: Manufacturing: Warehousing: Other: D_o /yyou use/store/discharge flammable, hazardous, or biohazardous materials? quantity: Local Emergency Contacts: Phone 1. 2. BNo • Yes If "Yes", state type and Is your business activity - or any portions of your building - different than the previous use of this building/space? If YES, please provide description. (Use separate sheet, if necessary) [lo • Yes Are you PRESENTLY DOING (or PLANNING TO DO) any:/ Construction, remodeling, or installation of commercial storage racks? N Installation of new signage or changes in existing signage? iE&:, List Permit Numbers: —► Ii Presently Doing ■ Yes L) Yes If Planning To Do: Contact the City of Tukwila's Permit Center regarding permit requirements PRIOR TO STARTING. IF RENEWAL -o- Show 2005 City of Tukwila Business License No.: NEW OR RENEWAL -3 (Read CTR information on reverse side) No. of CTR "affected employees" at the site for which this business license application is filed: If you are a new building owner or planning to sell a building - please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side Date: , 8 OFFICE USE _ o ONLY Received by: L - , Paid: Cash t, 4t (00, Receipt No.: 3 1 c Building: Q Planning: j j,,t\ Zoning designation: ` ® N1 / ■ Buildin. • ermit attached Policy Fire( . Date issued: i ".. C) 2006 License No.: r . WA State Sales Tax # C M A or UBI number (9 digits): ' I certify the information contained herein is correct. I understand that iiy untrue statement ,----21§ s) for rev cation of my license. Signatur Pn .Name:/ cm & a) fitio6.y Title/Office: f LICENSE FEE 0 t 5 (based on number CHECK ONE 100 $100.00 of employees) ( Z 0 ❑ 101 and above $ e - Please return completed application with fee to Tukwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention: City Clerk's Office 2Lr-.C2( U. -_ cud '" qt( --7 6 0 City of Tukwila 2007 Business License Application 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188-2544 206-433-1800 This is an APPLICATION ONLY, and NOT a license to conduct business. You must obtain a business license PRIOR to conducting business. ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEMBER 31 FILL OUT THIS FORM IN ITS ENTIRETY INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Business License: Ia'fiNEWAL ■ NEW Application Date: Unisys Corporation Business Name Local Street Unisys Corporation Address (include zip+4) 11621 E MARGINAL WY S #B• Local PO Box, TUKWILA WA 98168-1965 f applicable Email Address: Corporate Address, if different from logy,'- Unisys Way Blue Bell PA 19424'. ® j ;GS UNIS S - ` +\ J j ® 7 \ Local Business Phone (incl. area code): ( 206 ) 4 4 4- 7 6 0 0 Corporate Phone: 7 In \ ( ) V ■ If business name has changed in past year, list former name. Indicate ownership status: • Individual Partnership ■ LLC []corporation ■ Non-profit Local manager (include name and home phone): Original opening date of business in Tukwila: 03/00/06 List owners/partners/officers: Title Home Address City/State/Zip Phone Date of Birth IS YOUR Door-to-door solicitation/peddler? ■ No ■ Yes BUSINESS: Contractor, based outside of the City? • No • Yes If "Yes", show jobsite address in space below Operated from your Tukwila residence? • No ❑ Yes If "Yes", read information on reverse side and sign Any gambling and/or gambling devices on premises? ■ No • Yes Any amusement devices on premises? • No • Yes If "Yes", number of devices: Description of business (give details; also, list types of products sold or stored): Check Processing Will retail sales be conducted? • Yes o Size of floor space used: sq. ft. Number of available parking spaces: Total employees at Tukwila location (including owners 1 and managers): Full-time: 9i, Part-time: Number of employees in each type of employment: Office: Retail: Wholesale: Manufacturing: Warehousing: Other: Do you use/store/discharge flammable, If "Yes", state type and quantity: hazardous, or biohazardous materials? ■ No IN Yes Local Emergency Contacts: Phone 1. 2. Is your business activity - or any portions of your building - different than the previous use of this building/space? • No • Yes 1f YES, please provide description. (Use separate sheet, if necessary) Are you PRESENTLY DOING (or PLANNING TO DO) any: Construction, remodeling, or installation of commercial storage racks? [moo • Yes Installation of new signage or changes in existing signage? [etc) ■ Yes If "YES" Presently Doing List Permit Numbers: If -TES" Planning To Do: Contact the City of Tukwila's Permit Center regarding permit requirements PRIOR TO STARTING IFRENEWAL -- Show 2006 City of Tukwila Business License No.: 06-2034 NEW OR RENEWAL —► No. of CTR "affected employees" at the site for which this business license application is filed: (see reverse side) If you are a new building owner or planning to sell a building - please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side OFFICE USE Date: I i , Li 0 ._ ONLY Received by: Paid: III Cash ctk- (0 0 , -7 3 g— Receipt No.: heck No.: `t ,0 Building. Panning: Zoning designation: NAISC Use Code: • Building/sign permit attached Police: Date _CI _ 0 issued: Fire: 2007 License Number: ° 1 _ ' f ` a WA State Sales Tax # 409000384 or UBI number (9 digits): READ I certify the information contained herein is correct & I understand that an untrue statement SIGN is - e • revoc on of my license. Signale: Pri • I ame: -Thom/ . 6 t.e)A-k)EY Title/Office: /f -S5 i,S% ,/T \'L3.Q'e 614—i LICENSE FEE ❑, /0 to 5 (based on number CHECK ONE [ 'o to 100 $100.00 of employees) ❑ 101 and above 200.00 Please return completed application with fee to Tukwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention: City Clerk's Office TO: File FROM: Barbara DATE: April 19, 2007 RE: Unisys Corporation They have already renewed two licenses for 2007: Unisys Corp. ... Check Processing 11621 E. Marginal Wy S., #B Unisys Corp. ... Service & Repair of PCs200 Andover Pk. E., #9 Carol Ann called from their corporate office today to say they are moving out of the 200 APE space and combining both functions at the E. Marg. Wy- location. ylocation. In a way it's a change of use for the E. Marginal Wy. space, but at the same time it's really just an address change for the 200 APE location. And they paid $100.00 for each location already for 2007 (making the $200 total for the combined number of employees). kAvon wr.c j w k © T �jV L.S 0,.\\ o v\ 5 e c -2- k- a c. O 9- O -[45- 0-7- l'C5o-7- v- Ci) nes G1�j��oC` ��k5 . ✓ Co r• 0TO-trr%�r TtrlO v�rn � SW a ve t,\\$- c City of Tukwila 2007 Business License Application 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188-2544 206-433-1800 This is an APPLICATION ONLY, and NOT a license to conduct business. You must obtain a business license PRIOR to conducting business. ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEMBER 31 FILL OUT THIS FORM IN ITS ENTIRETY INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Business License: t!7 RENEWAL • NEW Application Date: Business Name Local Street Address (include zip+4) Unisys Item Processing Svcs. Local PO Box, 11621 E MARGINAL WY S ttA if applicable TUKWILA WA 98168-1965 Email Address: Corporate Address, if different from local: Unisys Corporation Unisys Way Blue Bell PA 19424 Local Business Phone (incl. area code): ( 206 ) 444-7600 Corporate Phone: ( ) If business name has changed in past year, list former name. Indicate ownership status: • Individual ■ Partnership • LLC j orporation • Non-profit Local manager (include name and home phone): Original opening date of business in Tukwila: 0340/06 List owners/partners/officers: Title Home Address City/State/Zip Phone Date of Birth IS YOUR Door-to-door solicitation/peddler? Q1 o ■ Yes BUSINESS: Contractor, based outside of the City? Pl< ■ Yes If "Yes", show jobsite address in space below / Operated from your Tukwila residence? tvo ❑Yes If "Yes", read information on reverse side and sign Any gambling and/or gambling devices on premises? DI -KT ■ Yes Any amusement devices on premises? Qo • Yes If "Yes", number of devices: Description of business (give details; also, list types of products sold or stored): Check Processing Will retail sales be conducted? ■ Yes leg3 Size of floor space used: sq. ft. Number of available parking spaces: Total employees at Tukwila location (including owners and managers): Full-time:174/ Part-time: Number of employees in each type of employment: Office: Retail: Wholesale: Manufacturing: Warehousing: Other: Do you use/store/discharge flammable, If "Yes", state type and quantity: hazardo , or biohazardous materials? o ■ Yes Local Emergency Contacts: Phone 1. 2. Is your business activity - or any portions of your building - different than the previous use of this building/space? • No • Yes If YES, please provide description. (Use separate sheet, if necessary) Are you PRESENTLY DOING (or PLANNING TO DO) any: Construction, remodeling, or installation of commercial storage racks? • No 0 Yes Installation of new signage or changes in existing signage? • No "'Yes — --- - — ---- --------------- • If "YES" P.esently ^.i.g List Permit Numbers: -- If es- __._..----------------------___-----_..-------- YES?ianningTo Do: Contact the Ci ofTukwila's Permit Center regarding permit requirements PRIOR TO STARTING IF RENEWAL —s Show 2006 City of Tukwila Business License No.: 06-2035 NEW OR RENEWAL — - No. of CTR "affected employees" at the site for which this business license application is filed: (see reverse side) If you are a new building owner or planning to sell a building - please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side OFFICE USE Date: ((-0-7 ONLY Received by: Siti.ur 1` „ eIP Paid: ash it ( o0 . Check No.: 0 O ORct Receipt No.: 3 Buildin : Planning: Zoning designation: NAISC Use Code: • Building/sign permit attached Police: Date issued: o2-, _ t) -! 0 7 Fire: 2007 License Number: WA State Sales Tax # or UBI number (9 digits): 409000384 READ I certify the information contained herein is correct. & I understand that any untrue statement SIGN a • ,r revo tion of my license. Siti.ur 1` „ eIP -PP t Name: Mdo74-S C . DC,0/-i)E › Title/Office: s ifa% j A `- Tl4 LICENSE FEE El 0 to 5 CHECK ONE $ (based on number A -6 -to 100 $100.00 ❑ 101 and above 200 of employees) Please return completed application with fee to Tukwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention: City Clerk's Office TO: File FROM: Barbara DATE: April 19, 2007 RE: Unisys Corporation They have already renewed two licenses for 2007: Unisys Corp. ... Check Processing 11621 E. Marginal Wy S., #B Unisys Corp. ... Service & Repair of PCs200 Andover Pk. E., #9 Carol Ann called from their corporate office today to say they are moving out of the 200 APE space and combining both functions at the E. Marg. Wy location. In a way it's a change of use for the E. Marginal Wy. space, but at the same time it's really just an address change for the 200 APE location. And they paid $100.00 for each location already for 2007 (making the $200 total for the combined number of employees). C co ` o c, ov \ p v. 5 1P c -Q uLS — (i) 0.1.-t�lSg Oc (XV\��i1)� 5 (or 9. 0 r r/ -5 J elt\-ro, 4t w -. Or) ��0 Ovn t1 5 -(Ai YN2 c Ofd' 04/19/2007 11:56! -FAX 206 433 1833 City of Tukwila City ojTukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 981882544 206.433-1800 This is an APPLICATION ONLY, and NOT a license to conduct business. You must obtain a business license PRIOR to conducting business. ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEMBER 31 **. OOMBINING TWO LOCATIONS ** l 002/003 2007 Business License Application FILL OUT THIS FORM IN ITS ENTIRETY INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT EE PROCESSED Business License; ❑ RENEWAL 171 NEW I Application Date: Received by: l0 ` Paid: II Cash Business Name Local Street Unisys Corporation Address (includezfp+4) 11621 E MARGINAL WY' S, #B Local PO Box, TUKWILA, cam, 98168-1965 Z applicable O Email Address: - Corporate Address, if different from local: Unisys Corporation Unisys Way Blue Bell PA 19424 (w. 0 v 1.,.o .r,-o-oo0 Tv Pf ,1 J P G` L i 0 tilW J LoCaf Business Phone (incl area code): ( 206 ) 444-7600 Corporate Phone: .L X c --- 6 i 5 -PE e - 111'\°e ' If business name has changed in past year, list former name. Indicate ownership status: 1 individual B Partnership • LL •ftorporauon ❑ Non-prolit 5e Local manager (include name and home phone): Original opening date 03/00/06U Of business in Tukwila: List owners/partners/officers: Title 4I1 r reprr ,jj c City/State/Zip Phone Date or Birth i.' ' ' ' ' ' iA.04 e Lr--C.A ) } L " "j' `° io ❑ Yes IS YOUR Door-to-door sollchadon/peddler? BUSINESS: Contractor, based Outside of the City? Fido 0 Yes 1/ "Yes", showJobslte address in space below Operated from your Tukwila residence? ( No El Yes 1"res.", read Information on reverse side and sign Any gambling and/or gambling devices nn premises? Erflo ❑ Yes Any amusement devices on premises? Ergo 9 Yes 1f "Yes", number of devices: Description of business (give details; also, list types of products sold or stored): Check Processing 5 ,, V c i I"`j-' Will retail sales be conducted ■ Yes ViNo Size of floor space used: sq. ft.lpaces: Number of available parking Total employees at Tukwila location (including owners // and managers): Pull. time: /46 Part-time: Number of employees in each type of employment: Office: Recall: Wholesale: Manufacturing: Warehousing: Other: DO you use/store/discharge flammable, If "Yes", state type and quantity: hazardous, or blohazardous materials? ❑ No ❑ Yes Local Emergency Contacts: Phone 1. 2, Is your business activity - or any portions Of your building- different than the previous use of this building/space? [2fQo ❑ Yes !f YES, please provide description. (Use separate sheet, If necessary) Are you PRESENTLY DOING (or PL4NNING TO DO) any: Construction, remodeling, or installation of Commercial storage racks? (moo • Yes _ lnstalladon of new. ,N Signage or changes in existing signage? 5 ❑Yes If "YES" Presently Doing List Permit Numbers: G 1°5L- • °-.1 — A4' a 1 C -7 — ‘`-k5-7 4- I y 5` I. ! "YES" Planning To Do: Contact the City of Tukwila's Permit Center regarding permit requirernent3 PRIOR TO STARTING IF RENEWAL -t► Show 2006 06..2034 City Of Tukwila Business License No.: NEW OR RENEWAL --IP-No. of CTR "affected employees" at the site for which this business license application is filed: (see reverse side) Jfyou are a new building owner or planning to sella building – please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side OFFICE USE ONLY Date: (5._ Received by: l0 ` Paid: II Cash Receipt No.: I10 0 v`\ v\ l 0 c cA.i.iO1\$ ■ check NO,: Co v Building: / ❑ Building/sign permf ihed Planting: 1 M , i- Zoning designation: \L,L NAISC Use Code: Police: ...--- / DateFire issued: G ''r0 to/w.,-. 5 2007 License Number: WA State Sales Tax # or UB1 number (9 digits): 409 000 384 BREAD I mmfY the information contained herein is correct. & I under . - • . • t any untrue statement • ,«3T,1 Is -: : • fob • ;cab, .f my license. Signatu'. 4 .t'om' .4r./ ._, Tile/Office: s g5 / — c% -77 Y LICENSE FEE Er0 to 5 $50.00 '/ (based on number CHECK ONE 0 6 to 100 S100.00 of employees) (] 101 and above $200.00 Please return completed application with fee to Thkwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention: Clty Clerks Office TO: File FROM: Barbara DATE: April 19, 2007 RE: Unisys Corporation They have already renewed two licenses for 2007: Unisys Corp.... Check Processing 11621 E. Marginal Wy S., #B Unisys Corp.... Service & Repair of PCs200 Andover Pk. E., #9 Carol Ann called from their corporate office today to say they are moving out of the 200 APE space and combining both functions at the E. Marg. Wy location. In a way it's a change of use for the E. Marginal Wy. space, but at the same time it's really just an address change for the 200 APE location. And they paid $100.00 for each location already for 2007 (making the $200 total for the combined number of employees). C rod ��-�. so to CI -7 (4 7) �.:p l� v� C 5 1�� j Co r9. o T o �ti i Sti ff a v\42 h 17f 1Z/16/ZUU9 1U:bli FAA ZUb 433 1433 city or 'lillcwila X910 City of Tukwila 2010 Business License Application 1 003/004 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188-2544 206-433-1800 This is an APPLICATION ONLY, and NOT a license to conduct business. You must obtain a business license PRIOR to conducting business. ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEMBER 31 FILL OUT THIS FORM IN ITS ENTIRETY INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Business License: [,RENEWAL ❑ NEW ❑ CHANGE ❖ Application Date: 1 / i ® C' Paid: ■ Cash heck #: 434 - O9 5_ Receipt #: — ?/.q Business Name Unisys Corporation Local Street - 1 E MARG • t. WY S Address (include zip+4) TUK- Local POBox, Corpo . ddress, if .'• . :.1 (name, address, ownership): ' -` ' 4 Wat rj t if applicable 1 C Se d `lr c-.lr eck vv,2 . e ' Email Address: jr p : 3- K P4 , l Local Business Phone (incl.area code): ( 206 ).444-7600 Corpo . • • • • • - (a)s- ) qS6- 3 V S - If business name has changed in past year, list former name. = Indicate ownership status: ❑ Individual ❑ Partnership • LLC rf Corporation • Non-profit Local manager (include name and home phone): - Original opening date of business in Tukwila: 03/20/06 List all owners/partners/officers: Unisys Corporation Home Address City/State/Zip Phone Date of Birth Unisys Way t, •- ' Blue Bell PA 19424 1 IS YOUR Door-to-door solicitation/peddler? io ■ Yes BUSINESS: Contractor, based outside of the City? - No • Yes If "Yes", show jobsite address in space below Operated from your Tukwila residence? Lo No ❑ Yes If "Yes", read information on reverse side and sign Do you collect parking fees? • No ■ Yes Any gambling and/or gambling devices on premises? 0.4145 U Yes Any amysefnent devices on premises? No • Yes If "Yes", number of devices: Description of business (give details; also, list types of products sold or stored): Check processing Will retail sales be conducted? QfYes ■ No Size of floor space used: sq. fL Number of available parking spaces: Total employees at Tukwila location (including owners ` and managers): Full-time:. Part -ti • Number of employees in each type ofemplo ent: Office: Retail: j j, c&4 G 0..-N, t.rv-k-0 Wholesale: Manufacturing:'\ Warehousing: Other: Do you use/store/dischar maple, If "Yes", state type and quantity: hazardous, or biohazar s materials? ■ No ❑ Yes Local Emergency Contacts: Phone 1. 2. Is your business activity - or any portions of your building - different than the previous use of this building/space? ❑ No ❑ Yes If YES, please provide description. (Use separate sheet, if necessary) Are you PRESENTLY DOING (or PLANNING TO DO) any: Construction, remodeling, or installation of commercial storage racks? ❑ No • Yes Installation of new signage or changes to existing signage, including copy changes? • No • Yes If "YES" Presently Doing If "YES" Planning To Do: Contact the City of Tukwila's Permit List Permit Numbers: Center regarding permit requirements PRIOR TO STARTING IF RENEWAL -.o. Show 2009 City of Tukwila Business License No.: 09-969 -- WA State Sales Tax # or UBI number (9 digits): 409000384 Be sure to review the updated requirements of the Commute Trip Reduction Program on reverse side. you are a new buliding owner or planning to sell a building - OFFICE USE ONLY Date: _ ,? _ O Received by: Paid: ■ Cash heck #: 434 - O9 5_ Receipt #: — ?/.q • Credit card authorization # Building: %kiki VC -12- Planning: tf6 Zoning design on: 1 IS Code: - 0 LA- 1 A • Building/sign permit attached Police: -.k._ t -k -i \ Date issued: 3/n/ 1 0 Fire: 2010 License Number: ( c^ 35 - READ SIGN I certify the information contained herein is correct. I understand that any untrue statement Is cause for revocation of my license. Print Name: (2,e) R.Xe-Ye/25 Ti e/Office: OS ST S fee% /e LICENSE FEE (based upon number LI 0 to 20, of employees, or if a 5421 to 50 home occupation) ❑ 51 to 100 $200.00 cx ... $100.00 OPRIATE BOX 101 and up $300.00 ❑ HOME OCCUPATION (per TMC 5.04.010) $50.00 Please return completed application with fee to Tukwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention City Clerk's Office City of Tuk .la 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188-2544 206-433-1800 This is an APPLICATION ONLY, and NOT a license to conduct business. You must obtain a business license PRIOR to conducting business. ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEMBER 31 2010 Busines. icense Application FILL OUT THIS FORM IN ITS ENTIRETY INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Business License: ❑ RENEWAL ❑ NEW ❑ CHANGE Application Date: Business Name Unisys Item Processing Svcs. Local Street 11621 E MARGINAL WY S #A Address (includezip+4) TUKWILA WA 98168-1965I Local PO Box, if applicable ' Email Address: Corporate Address, if different from local (name, address, ownership): - / l /,9 i / \ \ c5 —e v l ■ Credit card authorization # Local Business Phone (incl. area code): ( 206 )444-7600e Corporate Phone: — _,.. _•- ( •' r 4 r If business name has changed in past year, list ormer nal-gee-7AIndicate ownership status: IN Individual ■ Pa tnership LLC • Corporation • Non-profit Local manager (include name and home ho Original opening date of business in Tukwila: 03/20/06 Lisa f owners/p tnerKpffi ers: .F itle Home Address City/State/Zip Phone Date of Birth N, -01 c a, -o R- vk i- i9,.._ --,.._. I B ;,SINESS: Door-to-door solicita • ..^ • ? • No ■ Yes Contractor, based 'I a of the City? • No ■ Yes 14 If "Yes", show jobsite address in space below Operated from your Tukwila residence? ■ No ■ Yes 1f "Yes", read information on reverse side and sign Do you collect parking fees? • No ■ Yes Any gambling and/or gambling devices on premises? • No ■ Yes Any amusement devices on premises? ■ No IN Yes If "Yes", number of devices. Description of business (give details; also, list types of products sold or stored): (.- Check Processing Will retail sales cYes c Size of floor ce used: gq, ft. spa Num r of available s: i Total employees at Tukwila location (including owners and managers): Full -lime: Part-time: Number of employe s in each type of employn}ent: Office: Retai Wholesale: Manufacturi ar°using: (?ther f-- ,.e Do you use/store/discharge flammable, If "Yes", state type and quantity: hazardous, or biohazardous materials? ■ No ■ Yes caltnerenc C tacts: Phone 1 2. Is your business activity - or any portions of your building - different than the previous use of this building/space?e ■ No ■ Yes If YES, please provide description. (Use separate sheet, if necessary) 4-- 3 rcj x Are you PRESENTLY DOING (or PLANNING TO DO) any: Construction, remodeling, or installation of commercial storage racks? • No Yes Installation of new signage or changes to existing signage, including copy changes? • No • Yes If "YES" Presently Doing If "YES" Planning To Do: Contact the City of Tukwila's Permit List Permit Numbers: Center regarding permit requirements PRIOR TO STARTING IF RENEWAL --0.- Show 2009 City of Tukwila Business License No.: 09-97° WA State Sales Tax # or UBI number (9 digits): 4 0 9 0 0 0 3 84 Be sure to review the updated requirements of the Commute Trip Reduction Program on reverse side ❖ If you are a new building owner or planning to sell a building - please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side ❖ OFFICE USE Date: ONLY Received by: Paid: • Cash ■ Check #: ' Receipt #: ■ Credit card authorization # Building: Planning: Zoning designation: NAISC Use Code: ■ Building/sign permit attached Police: Date issued: Fire: 2010 License Number: READ & SIGN I certify the information contained herein is correct. I understand that any untrue statement is cause for revocation of my license. Signature: ' Print Name: ' Title/Office: , LICENSE FEE (based upon number El to 20 $100.00 ❑ 101 and up $300.1 of employees, or if a ❑ 21 to 50 $150.00 ❑ HOME OCCUPATION home occupation) ❑ 51 to 100 $200.00 (per TMC 5.04.010) $50.1 CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX Please return completed application with fee to Tukwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention: City Clerk's Office City of Tukwila 0200 Southcenter 7ilkwila, !Vas/if/won (.`81S82543 206,433. /800 2009 Business License Application • our THIS FORM IN inEWT1RETY - INWMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOTJE:PROCESSED tc:vw This is an APPLICATION ONLY, and NOT a license to conduct business 0-F-- tks iBusiness License: ou must obtain a business. license PRIOR to conducting business. ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEMBER 31 Application Dare: LVRENEWAL it NEW Business Name i Local fltreel i Addresti tic'!,/) :-.11,44! 1.1)C2il0 RON. 1 6'irp.ollfeatiirt OA limail Addrees: i.Ocal Unisys Corporation 11621 E MARGINAL WY S TUKWILA WA 98168-1965 alea CCkle!.' 206 i 444-7600 f beenname err -geed n tot year ri• iit Idrmer rarre 1:.indieate ........•. rllanager 1117(1,k Likeloiptration rt.:jot:mat onenit-ni. dare ! bi,Einett's fit •bikteilat 03/20/06 i 2. I L. 1 Corporate Addresit., if different from local: Unisys Corporation Unisys Way I Blue Bell pp, 19424 1 iriltornerri Ph,... • • rf..it.777,,Y1';;;;71-.TaW17;;;T1titt-...:.--- "Hirt; - —7-icene Address ' Cilty,t)itete/L0t Phone Dam E. -if F;Z'Eh is YOUR Door-to:door dolicitationipeddler? ii?S‘ BUSYNESS: Conn-a:tor, based biLl triidii of the 00? [t140 D If 'Yes"; show jobsite address in Spare Operated from your Tukaella reaideme? 41 'Ws" read Wormation on reverse side and Sign Description of business (glee details; also, list Pines of products sold or stored): er ertr -peg I'lles Any gambling and/or gambling devices on premisBe? Ye!: 0 WS [inc uly ati9sement devices on pri.:m'f,,::;? 1.:-.71 No LO D.1-; 1! "Yes' number nii der,',.: Inl retail sales 'Sire of thint space or.e.:thi!Number of lavailabie , !parking i Number ol employees in et,i.11 type ., 61110;0,,,,,ent; OffiCe: n,,,.,,. —I be conde :t I riv !o; arion qr.:zit/dr:7,e • di les i 1 , . f. L... •.,d pa. -„?...i.,,5., Pitt - mo,- 117 Partrime: ',,, i -r ''' i iloesale, e.-iiritaeiiripr!, Wart-hotiaing.: (..411,r;r. ! ,• , 00 ecuuseir'storeiiiiKtiariat flammabe; If "Yes", to i.7f),.. an,j quziitiiy: I Lo;';i1 i'tIt,z-zsttcy C.:,trttpc.s- ; a:anfoue. or bonaaardous !nal.e.1..lie? Phone I I-1 hin 1-1, Yes ! I is yttor utismess aei,eity - te any pork,111, iii 'jinn' bliilding - iiltibiiini than Vile pry.,,IOUS ,1`,W..i.,, III'S 11,1.1i1.1iliVSpai.,?.?— , .. , piterise des,:relorio,n i I Ise SeParate :thee Are you PEESENIZY DOING for PLAIVN11,1G TO ''YES" Presently Doing Nomitern: D(VanY, VW.) comrtv.lciFt.isitirrige rack;!? 11•00 "! tes intitaliatfon ol new signage or changes in antir,rlint signage? ltyies If "YES- Planning TO Do: ,,Tf:Fi! Pc.? mit IF RENEWAL -* iiaix 2008 Vti.); State Sales Tatt 11 UBI number (9 0;R39, Cltv of Trike:ile. iC,.11Se ° 8-923 i 409000384 Ifyou are a new building owner or planning to soli a braiding -please note fire alarm i ,Z1,7171i HUOR i060!33,W; 1 H Be sure to review the updated requirements of the Commute Trip Reduction Program on reverse side nstallation provisions on reverse side 4. OFFICE USX ONLY 'MAU I cerhij, the inforrnon contained herein is oorrect.. i Dare: ! Rece.need by: i . , 4 • rstand t t agy untrue statement i ,.;,siGq. ass for vocation of my license. - . ___. . . _. . _____ ... j , l'idd: 11.1C.T.Sh i Re-eipf. 4 'thecif acjoid Build' &`•••—• 24en/J-S Ct_. um-ioey 1 ,Secxf:71+0 ' ID I+ i permit aitacrT•ir Zianinii deriitiation: (...., 07 I NAP3(•)1.1so Code - ! ! Date ! ---•- -••••••i LICENSE FEE --I 1 i {based vnn lti to 20. $ itcil:oi.<0. r, - R : .. 71PoRt.tAa n:uspOx I issus•d: ;27.,,,.. _L-_--( —7 --b 1 ! t qt =?Wictveesnurabei ''''i -fa F-12110 50 ..... .....: .00 !--) HOME GCCUPATiO 2000 ithterma bliimb.H: tS43°"e Li 51 lo 100 .$200.00 Ciar?r TMC 5.0,1010).......950 05, • / 0 ci -at 6. Please retirrn completed application with fee to Tukwila City Hall at address shown above, Attention: City Clerk's Office C.o e-ak 0-.0 pro c.VN r c Q .5 5 (N C )2_ c 0 ts au\ RECEIVED JAN ri 273 ki\A`vr‘ \- 3 09 COM, '41' DEVELON.,U` (O j IBusiness License: City of 71thwila o200 so„,h,„.., Baiik,uard mheil„, MshingNn 2818S2344 206 4.33. j 800 0 0- 2009 Business License Application LE, OM THIS FORM IN its .61711tarr INCOMPLETE APPLICAI ifsgs WILL NOT LW pitomssito This is an APPLICATION ONLY, and NOT a license to conduct business. You must obtain a business' license PRIOR to conducting business. ALL LICENSES EXPIRE DECEMBER 31 Business Name Local Str,ef Address fBic.A.:,:,/,'7+4.: LOCW1 PO ao if api.,--ilcdble Emajl Addres.s: Loc 1-FAISISS PhOJW: ))0k l'Uone: L.11 RENEWAL Li NEW Unisys Item Processing Svcs. 11621 E MARGINAL WY 9 #A TUKWILA WA 98168-1965 Appliclulon Date: 2. ITZ, og Corpotate dirlerenr. h:1: Unisys Corporation Unisys Way Blue Bell PA 19424 206 444-7600 i II kusiness tame las cl roSetI 10 net ler ilst lonner rive i •• • ,L.__...1..).H,iivs1 .,1.1?1 ri '' r Its, 71 Is,k-il-1 .'rc;ini',1 opening da:r' ,..,.., ,. . . 1 Of bil,'..ifie,S It', Tukwila: onet:, peiTli-Tr1.-:,Jfaer6: , , _ ,......._. Tikie 1-itep,e A.6.11'(FS '....., .. Cify.'State,7.JD pii,,rC,:3 /2 0/06 I 1 Dbr.: of. Bin b 1S YOUR ' 11 lkoor-10,.loor solid iations'peddIer;' rj tqt, D Yes • BUSINESS: ConIkactor, based outside a the CL? Any gambling ands'or gambiing devic.es on prcuujses'i' , Operated from your tuk,viUa residence"! If "Yes" show jobsite add-ess i71 space belowf..) 111 Ye' ii4-?‹, Elles ! L.70 [...i Yes : . ,Vri nj,L',47.270ent dfu,dces pi) preinisps? • . .••• , . It readitybrmaton on reverse side b:.nd sign t!TNQ E.] YE::, if "Yes', number or devicps: besmpliou of bur,iness lisp details; also, list typps :•:i pmduck: r.o:d or stored!: i Check Processing MIT:01A so ISi'<:(' 01 flOr.%: WIN i.I.Sed:INillIlf;eY 07 avellabe ! Ibe c:ondocte.ik? j Iparkiug, _ I C3 Yes Li No j Ted, employees ar 'Tukwila location 1 Numkes of empkwees in each tyyg: of employment-. ()tap: sq. fk sBa,:ps: I etail: 1 ,InCitiflinif 011,,VrY EI and mapag,er.$): (A1.1tme: S-TdrJ-time: F 1 ,,,,,,,,aie: __ _ ,....,,,,:„Caciuling: tA'arehousing: Odu,z: D,: you ,. ....:;,:ore/dj,:chare flUliTII<Ibif.: if "Ws-, staIe type dud quantity: i ha - I .us. or bio5a,,,,,Fdeus matoiais? ;Lou:: kruesgency ConfacIs: I Is four business act:vire . oriptif,fi, r an:,, pc:rtlou: of 1.eur buj!dUlg - dIr.c..x-pill thW1 the previous usp of tius .;ilUlding.':;p:-,e,:? 1:.?' C1)ils lz if , . . yk...c, vicase TTOVifie fieSCit:1,C- separate Stlf.C.. if necess,ryl Are you PRESENTLY DOING tor PLANNING 10 00) any: ...,.,nstructa :rurnorfeiini, ok-insiaTil,T;I eon -nen -JAI ;;I:u•z,g, racks? 4 c I Yes , trls:eibuon of ilev, signage 07 chn e 5nges ixng ignag..c? I if 'YES- I'resertay Doilw Li No Frri',:s ! fis,rp.,,,nitivariib..,rs: rf 'Fa-plan/14v. T/o: C),!::k • .,. ..Ig! (.7fu-7i,,P,umis J 1 (...1-rdu, fpg.n1i5:B7.P,'sy:75- .,-;:qpiremetip: is,',5-, i.,9STAPP(V!".; I IF RENEWAL -->a,. Sh‘w., 20/B ., ---T:‘-'!%1 Srat':' Sales *Fax i! or DIM number dkljts): I Be sure to review the updated requirements of the I Cir,r oi' Tukwila DusUIess i.icense No.: 08-9-- _! 409000384 [ Commute Trip Reduction Program on reverse side. i!. lfyou are a new building owner or planning to sell a building - please note fire alarm installation provisions on reverse side ' ',',..',.:''. • .:':' :i 1: .; . • i ,',!::::1N:''. l,' .1 :=',. ,:*.:: 000-#O; ONLY I Date: keeeived by: --,) ai 1' ia: 1-1 Cash i Receipj No.: 1 3 o#p 5-1:::). VI ! Buiidir g: go oi Hanging,: 11 El Building/stx pc:rmit dB:idled ; :::prlin, cic:::kno:on: j Poike: I I Daue I Pre: 1 2000 License Number: 1 certify the information contained herein is correct rstanti th any anima statement Ian for iocation of my license. 0 —1 is75711: 1#40 6 rui4 A/64 I 1 417 -5 -e -c, LICENSE FEE CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX !based upon ninaboi kip k, 20 S1000() 0 101 and up $300 00 '1,,emPl'Ye'''' ''; i f .1 11 21 to 50 c,"' ': : I HOME OCCUPATION ! _ I ''''''''' cauP" X1 to 100 ,i200 CO ,er TMC 510 n !ai $50 00 Please return completed application with fee to Tukwila CiOr Hall at address shown above, canon: City C'lerles Office TO: File FROM: Barbara DATE: January 22, 2010 RE: Unisys / Qwinstar In 2009, Unisys had two entities licensed at 11621 E. Marginal Way. Carolann from Unisys called in early December to say the Item Processing Svcs. entity was out. I processed an application that was on a preprinted renewal form for Unisys Corporation on 12-30-09. The check was written by "Qwinstar Corporation" and the paperwork did not have Carolann's name on it anywhere, which was unusual from prior years. Therefore I called Carolann to see if the company had changed names or ownership. Carolann did not recognize the Qwinstar name, but did recognize "3 Point Payment Processing," which was also written on the form. She said Unisys had sold a portion of their company to 3 Point Payment Processing. The question then arose of who was still at the 11621 E. Marginal Way address—Unisys or Qwinstar. Carolann called back to say Unisys is no longer in the E. Marginal Way location, but does still have one employee here who works out of his home (in Tukwila). They do not want Unisys licensed at that home address (5410 S. 150th St.). That person is a direct employee of Unisys, not a contract person. Unisys wants to keep a Unisys license for Tukwila as long as they still have this person here, and want to use the Blue Bell, PA address for the license. He works in the field; not his home. Carolann had already sent in a renewal for Unisys (at the E. Marginal Way address), so she directed us to change the address to Blue Bell, PA. The check was for $150.00 (based on prior year employee numbers), so I advised we would refund the $50.00, which seemed to be the easiest solution at this point. "1,666ec 6co OCCI,P. hon, Teri Svedahl From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Teri, Minnie Dhaliwal Friday, December 27, 2013 4:57 PM Teri Svedahl Max Baker postcard mailing request #2 L13-0051 Here is a second request for generating the mailing labels for L13-0051 (parcel # 1023049044). I entered this in TraklT and should be showing up on your workspace with the mailing date of Jan 16`h. I will be working with Max on this one, so we will get you the postcard next week, but wanted to give you a headstart on generating the mailing labels. I'll see in 2014, have a wonderful new year!! Minnie 1 01/03/2014 8:28 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 1 Page: 1 Customer 4 Full Name Full Primary Address ` 00022359 Radix Group Intl, Inc. 3315 S 116TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA98168-1980 00022972 LEP Profit 3315 S 116TH ST 4149 TUKWILA WA98168-1980 00023109 Radix Group Intl, Inc. 3315 S 116TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00023671 LEP Profit 3315 S 116TH ST 4149 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00025205 Radix Group Int'I, Inc. 3315 S 116TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00025719 LEP Profit 3315 S 116TH ST 4149 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00025957 Strata Communications 3315 S 1 I6TH ST 4115 TUKWILA WA98168-1974 00029495 Distributech 3315 S 116TH ST 4115 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00030520 Industrial Caster & Wheel Co 3315 S 116TH ST 4121 TUKWILA WA98168-1980 00031460 Eurobest 3315 S 116TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00033341 Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC 3315 S 116TH ST 4141 TUKWILA WA98168-1980 00034098 BLUE SKY INTEGRATED TECHNOL 3315 S 116TH ST 4121 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00034413 DIEBOLD INC T 8032 00034601 Firstline, Inc. 3315 S 116TH ST #149 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00057590 NORTHWEST FIRE SYSTEMS LLC 3315 S 116TH ST 4 115 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00062931 NORTHWEST FLUID SYSTEM 3315 S 116TH ST TECHNOLOGIES INC STE 109 TUKWILA WA98168-1980 Lount_16 _ j <Filter is Empry> Page: 1 Page: 1 01/03/2014 8:27 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 1 Page: 1 Customer # Full Name Full Primary Address 00027504 E B Bradley Co., Mfg. Agent 3314 S 116TH ST #B TUKWILA WA98168-1854 00028007 E B Bradley Co., Mfg. Agent 3314 S 116TH ST #B TUKWILA WA98168-1854 00030006 ExOfficio 3314 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168-1986 00032001 Ex Officio LLC 3314 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA98168-1986 00034550 Ex Officio (Marmot Mtn dba) 3314 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168-1986 Count: 5 <Filter is Fmpty> Page: 1 Page: 1 01/03!2014 8:23 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 1 Page: 1 Customer # 'Full Name Full Primary Address 00022688 Dan Transport 3415 S 116TH ST 4125 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00023295 Wang 3415 S 116TH ST #107 TUKWILA WA 98168-1968 00023417 Dan Transport 3415 S 116TH ST #125 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00024964 Integrated Freight Systems 3415 S 116TH ST 4125 TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00025689 KCI Therapeutic Svcs, Inc. '#123 3415 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00025998 TNT Express Worldwide 3415 S 116TH ST #103 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00026413 MSAS Cargo International 3415 S 116TH ST #109 TUKWILA WA98168-1972 00026951 General Elec./Aircraft Engns 15 116TH ST #1 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00027557 General Elec./Aircraft Engns 3415 S 116TH ST #123 TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00028465 DRC International n 3415 S 116TH ST TTUUKKWILA WA 98168-1978 00028862 Baron Internat. Aviation,lnc 3415 S 116TH ST 4103 TUKWILA WA 98168-1980 00028957 Compaq Computer Corp. 3415 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98188 00028990 Diebold, Inc. 3415 S 116TH ST 4113 TUKWILA WA98168-1972 00029047 General Elec./Aircraft Engns 3415 S 116TH ST 4123 TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00029666 Mediq/PRN Life Support Svcs. 3415 S 116TH ST 4123 TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00029842 Thunderbolt Computing, Inc. 3415 S 116TH ST 4103 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00030833 Blue Sky Integrated Technol. 3415 S 116TH ST 4103 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00030976 Hill -Rom Co., Inc. 3415 S 116TH ST 4123 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 Count: 28 <Filter is Empty Page: 1 Page: 1 01/03/2014 8:23 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 2 Page: 2 Customer # Full Name Full Primary Address 00031278 TaII's Camera, ]ncT . 15 S 116TH ST #1 TUKWILA WA 98188-1978 00032060 Hewlett-Packard Company 3415 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA98188 00032252 Associated Business Systems 3415 S 116TH ST 4113 TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00032307 Aviation Partners Boeing/APB 3415 S 116TH ST 4103 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00032830 ANDREWS SPACE INC 3415 S 116TH ST 4123 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00032936 SID TOOL CO INC 3415 S 116TH ST #125 TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00034081 ABC Bartending Schools 1002 INDUSTRY DR Bdg.3 TUKWILA WA 98188-4801 00034708 GLACIER ENVIRONM'L SVCS INC 3415 12IST ST SW LYNWOOD WA98087 00054676 LIEBERT CORPORATION 3415 S 116TH ST SUITE 103 TUKWILA WA98168-1978 00057048 SPACEFLIGHT INC 3415 S 116TH ST 4123 TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 (Count 28 1 <Filter is Empty> Page: 2 Page: 2 01/03/2014 8:24 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 1 Page: 1 Customer 4 IFull Name Full Primary Address 00029992 Electrical Distributing, Inc 3414 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168-1978 00032580 JACKSON DEAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3414 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168-1983 00033731 Taqueria Latinos 14005 42ND AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168-4142 Count: 3 Filter is Fmpty> Page: 1 Page: 1 01/03/2014 8:24 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 1 Page: 1 Customer # Full Name Full Primary Address 00030303 The Invironmentalists 11521 E MARGINAL WAY S #100 TUKWILA WA 98168-1979 00030968 Great Floors 11521 E MARGINAL WAY S #100 TUKWILA WA 98168-1979 00031006 JAS Forwarding "USA" 11521 E MARGINAL WAY S #120 TUKWILA WA 98168-1979 00034300 Complete Office 11521 E MARGINAL WAY S #100 TUKWILA WA 98168-1979 00055555 NORTHWEST GROCERS LLC 11521 E MARGINAL WAY S STE 120 TUKWILA WA98168 00058570 CHAMBER SERVICES INC 11521 MONARCH ST GARDEN GROVE CA 92841 Count: 6 •<Filter is Empty> Page: 1 Page: 1 01/03/2014 8:25 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 1 Page: 1 Customer # Full Name Full Primary Address 00026650 Tradeshow Convent. Sves,Inc. 11621 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA WA 98168-1965 00031307 Unisys Corporation 1 21 E MARGINAL WAY S 1 WILA WA98168-1965 00032353 Unisys Corporation 11621 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA WA 98168-1965 00032354 Unisys Item Processing Svcs. 11621 E MARGINAL WAY S TU ILA WA98168-1965 00033254 Qwinstar Corporation 11621 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA WA 98168-1965 Count: 5 -'1 It Page: 1 Page: 1 01/03/2014 8:26 AM Licensee Browse City of Tukwila Page: 1 Page: 1 Customer 4 Full Name ull Primary Address 00021939 Four Day Tire Store 3 TUKWILA WA 68-4309 00023547 Alton Geoscience, Inc. 3425 S 116TH ST 4100 TUKWILA WA 98168-1985 00024019 Yamato Custom Brokers USA 3425 S 116TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA 98168-1985 00024209 Health Infusion, Inc. 3425 S 116TH ST 4101 TUKWILA WA 98168-1985 00025419 Yamato Custom Brokers USA 3425 S 11 6TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA 98168-1985 00025420 Yamato Transport 3425 S 116TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA98168-1985 00026348 Larson Juhl, Inc. 3425 S 116TH ST TUKWILA WA98168-1977 00027105 MEDIQ/PRN Life Support Svcs. 3425 S 116TH ST 4101 TUKWILA WA98168-1985 00030358 XETA Technologies, Inc. 3425 S 116TH ST 4 101 TUKWILA WA98168-1985 00030877 Complete Office Solutions 3425 S 116TH ST #125 TUKWILA WA 98168-1985 00032430 Cookie Lee, Inc. 3425 S 116TH ST 4101 TUKWILA WA 98168-1985 00032745 LARSON JUHL US LLC 3425 S I I6TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168-1977 00033346 ROOF CORP OF WA INC 3425 S 146TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168-4309 00033442 SEARS HOME IMPROVEMENT PROD 3425 S 116TH ST 4109 TUKWILA WA98168-1985 00033488 SGS GLASS CO INC 3425 S 116TH ST 4125 TUKWILA WA 98168-1985 00050096 Lars Larsen 3425 S 128TH ST TUKWILA WA 98188 Cunt: 16 rl <Filter is Empty Page: 1 Page: 1 /( 57s Teri Svedahl From: Minnie Dhaliwal Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 4:52 PM To: Teri Svedahl Subject: post card mailing request #1 L13-0050 Teri, We need to mail a notice to the surrounding property owners and tenants for L13-0050 (parcel number 0040000865) . I added "mail notice" in TrakIT so it should be showing up on your tasks list. I tentatively picked the mailing date of Jan 14th. I will get you the postcard next week, but wanted to give a head start so you could start working on the mailing list. am off on the 30th and 315t, but will be in on the 2nd if you have any questions. Minnie 1 TO: Minnie Dhaliwal CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 2, 2014 SENT VIA: Courier Delivery City of Tukwila — Department of Community Development PHONE NO.: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 OUR JOB: 16440 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: AutoZone Store No. 4181 SEPA (E13-0018) and Design Review (L13-0050) Quantity Date Description 1 12/31/13 Check in the Amount of $449.00 for Preparation of Public Notice Mailing Labels Mi 44 5, q,9al0 ,��,0 Ta\tk _ A / B.G Enclosed is a check for the City's preparation of the public notice mailing labels for the AutoZone project. Thank you. cc: Mitch Bramlitt, AutoZone, Inc. Signed: Jason Hubbell, P.E. Senior Project Engineer 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • TUMWATER, WA • LONG BEACH, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA • SAN DIEGO, CA www.barghausen.com 16440t.007.doc Citci of J u it uea Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Mailing requested by: Max Baker/ , innie Dhaliwal x Notice of Application Notice of Decision x Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 16 day of _January , _2013 Project Name: PSF Mechanical Project Number: PL13-0052 Associated File Number (s): L13-0051 Mailing requested by: Max Baker/ , innie Dhaliwal Mailer's si _ nature: A // /. A __,.............._ W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Locati City of Tukwila Notice of Application and Hearing Conditional Use Permit— PSF Mechanical Location: 11621 East Marginal Way South File #'s: L13-0051 Applicant: James P. Reynolds Property Owner: PSF Mechanical Project Planner: Max Baker 206-431-3662 or Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov Project Description: A conditional use permit is required to locate an office use more than 20,000 sq. ft. in the manufactur- ing zone (MICA). The proposal is to renovate the existing building and add a second floor within the existing shell to use as an office building. The proposal also includes addition of an entry alcove on the east facade and a balcony on the west facade. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100, Tukwila WA 98188. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA 98188 or via email to Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received before or on February 4th , 2014 at 5:OOpm. This project is also scheduled for a public hearing on February llth, 2014 at 2 pm in the conference room 81 at Tukwila Department of Community Development (DCD), 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Ste 100, Tukwila WA 98188. You may also submit your comments at the public hearing, before the Hearing Examiner. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3662. Locati City of Tukwila Notice of Application and Hearing Conditional Use Permit— PSF Mechanical Location: 11621 East Marginal Way South File Ws: L13-0051 Applicant: James P. Reynolds Property Owner: PSF Mechanical Project Planner: Max Baker 206-431-3662 or Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov Project Description: A conditional use permit is required to locate an office use more than 20,000 sq. ft. in the manufactur- ing zone (MIC/L). The proposal is to renovate the existing building and add a second floor within the existing shell to use as an office building. The proposal also includes addition of an entry alcove on the east facade and a balcony on the west facade. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd 8100, Tukwila WA 98188. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA 98188 or via email to Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received before or on February 4th , 2014 at 5:OOpm. This project is also scheduled for a public hearing on February llth, 2014 at 2 pm in the conference room #1 at Tukwila Department of Community Development (DCD), 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Ste 100, Tukwila WA 98188. You may also submit your comments at the public hearing, before the Hearing Examiner. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3662. Locati City of Tukwila Notice of Application and Hearing Conditional Use Permit— PSF Mechanical Location: 11621 East Marginal Way South File #'s: 113-0051 Applicant: James P. Reynolds Property Owner: PSF Mechanical Project Planner: Max Baker 206-431-3662 or Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov Project Description: A conditional use permit is required to locate an office use more than 20,000 sq. ft. in the manufactur- ing zone (MIC/L). The proposal is to renovate the existing building and add a second floor within the existing shell to use as an office building. The proposal also includes addition of an entry alcove on the east facade and a balcony on the west facade. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd 8100, Tukwila WA 98188. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA 98188 or via email to Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received before or on February 4th , 2014 at 5:OOpm. This project is also scheduled for a public hearing on February llth, 2014 at 2 pm in the conference room 81 at Tukwila Department of Community Development (DCD), 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Ste 100, Tukwila WA 98188. You may also submit your comments at the public hearing, before the Hearing Examiner. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3662. Locati City of Tukwila Notice of Application and Hearing Conditional Use Permit— PSF Mechanical Location: 11621 East Marginal Way South File #'s: L13-0051 Applicant: James P. Reynolds Property Owner: PSF Mechanical Project Planner: Max Baker 206-431-3662 or Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov Project Description: A conditional use permit is required to locate an office use more than 20,000 sq. ft. in the manufactur- ing zone (MICA). The proposal is to renovate the existing building and add a second floor within the existing shell to use as an office building. The proposal also includes addition of an entry alcove on the east facade and a balcony on the west facade. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd 8100, Tukwila WA 98188. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA 98188 or via email to Max.Baker@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received before or on February 4th , 2014 at 5:OOpm. This project is also scheduled for a public hearing on February 11th, 2014 at 2 pm in the conference room 81 at Tukwila Department of Community Development (DCD), 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Ste 100, Tukwila WA 98188. You may also submit your comments at the public hearing, before the Hearing Examiner. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431-3662. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 AGENCY KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE KC METRO TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL QWEST COMMUNICATIONS SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT MUCKLESHOOT Cultural Resources Program MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program MUCKLESHOOT Wildlife Program DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING -OAP ACCOUNTING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY DIV Laura Murphy Karen Walter Mike Middleton ADDRESS 201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-NR-0505 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A 201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-TR-0431 23315 66th AVE S PO BOX 34023 PO BOX 90868 PO BOX 69550 8111 -1st AVE S 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 4705 W MARGINAL WAY SW CITY ST ZIP SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 KENT WA 98032 SEATTLE WA 98124 BELLEVUE WA 98009 SEATTLE WA 98168 SEATTLE WA 98108 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 SEATTLE WA 98106 FirstName David J TUKWILA Lettie J TUKWILA Ramon C & Aurora 0 Chung V & Nham T Pham TUKWILA Thien Huu & Nhung Hong TUKWILA Thomas & Trang Phan Sopheak & Sovannary Pot Susanna Nhan V & Chung T Nguyen Yuji Minh Ung & Hong Thi Ngu TUKWILA * Fra nk Douglas TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA * TUKWILA TUKWILA Long & Anna TUKWILA Vy T & Nam H Kha L & Christy H Tran Rafael Humberto & Susa Charlie LastName Shumate WOODRIDGE PARTNERS LLC COMMUNITY MEMBER Haggard COMMUNITY MEMBER Mallari Nguyen COMMUNITY MEMBER Nguyen COMMUNITY MEMBER Hoang Keith Asriyan Pham Higashi Hoang COMMUNITY MEMBER CHATHAM COMPANY LLC Siccardi Davies COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER SORRENTO PARTNERS LLC COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER Le COMMUNITY MEMBER Ho Hoang Santos Mccoy Address 113 W 9TH ST 11521 E MARGINAL WAY # 100 11521 E MARGINAL WAY S 11532 40TH AVE S 11534 E MARGINAL WAY S 11605 35TH LN S 11611 35TH AVE S 11611 35TH LN S 11617 35TH LN S 11621 E MARGINAL WAY S 11623 35TH LN S 11629 35TH LN S 11635 35TH LN S 11641 35TH LN S 11647 35TH LN S 11653 35TH LN S 11911 E MARGINAL WAY S 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S # 2422 195TH ST SE # B 25815 135TH LN SE # 9 3314 S 116TH ST 3315 S 116TH ST 3325 S 116TH ST 3334 S 116TH ST 3414 S 116TH ST 3415 S 116TH ST 3425 S 116TH ST 3520 S 116TH ST 3540 S 116TH ST 3545 S 116TH ST 3555 S 116TH ST 3565 S 116TH ST 3819 S 117TH ST CityState DULUTH MN SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA 130 SEATTLE WA BOTHELL WA KENT WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA Zip 55806 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98012 98042 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98176 98168 98168 TUKWILA TUKWILA * TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA * TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA COMPAQ TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA ELECTRICAL JACKSON DEAN TUKWILA TUKWILA TRADESHOW QWINSTAR LARSON JUHL TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER KING COUNTY -TRANSIT APOLLO HOLDINGS LLC SEATTLE CITY OF SCL EPROPERTY TAX INC DEPT 207 BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER EXOFFICIO BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER COMPUTER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER DISTRIBUTING CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER CONVENT SVCS CORP INC BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER BUSINESS MEMBER 3823 S 117TH ST 3825 S 117TH ST 500 4TH AVE 505 5TH AVE S # 900 PO BOX 34023 PO BOX 4900 3315 S 116TH ST #109 3315 S 116TH ST #149 3315 5 116TH ST #115 3315 S 116TH ST #121 3315 S 116TH ST #141 3314 S 116TH ST #B 3314 S 116TH ST 33415 5 116TH ST #125 33415 S 116TH ST #107 33415 S 116TH ST #123 33415 S 116TH ST #103 33415 S 116TH ST #109 33415 S 116TH ST #113 33415 S 116TH ST 33415 S 116TH ST 33415 S 116TH ST 33415 S 116TH ST 3414 S 116TH ST 3414 S 116TH ST 11521 EAST MARGINAL WAY S #100 11521 EAST MARGINAL WAY S #120 11621 EAST MARGINAL WAY S 11621 EAST MARGINAL WAY S 3425 S 116TH ST 3425 S 116TH ST #100 3425 5 116TH ST #109 3425 S 116TH ST #101 3425 S 116TH ST #125 TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SCOTTSDALE AZ TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA. TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA 98168 98168 98004 98104 98124 85261 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 J City of Tukwila CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite # 100 Tukwila, Washington 9fiY: t, E 1VED Phone: 206-431-3670 . t_.. DEC 3 0 2013 Part A: To be ' II is http://www.Tula 1113 I I119t IA IRKS rp (;{)INUIT jai 1 i )1-VLLOI'MI=NT PERMIT NO.: Site address (attach map and legal description showing hydrant location and size of main): 11621 East Marginal Way S Tukwila WA 98168 Owner Information Agent/Contact Person ;Name: Bruce Stock (Stock & Associates) Name: PSF Mechanical Address: 9322 14th Avenue S Seattle WA 98108 Address: 109 Bell Street Seattle WA 98121 Phone: 206.764.9663 Phone: 206.443.0494 This certificate is for the purposes of: 0 sidential Building Permit . Commercialflndustrial Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat 0 Rezone Estimated number of service connections and water meter size(s): (2) service co ❑ Short Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Other (Office > 20,000 sqft) nnections: (1) 2" connection, (1) irrigation Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point of structure is +1- 65 Area is served by (Vater Utility District): Water District 125 ft. wner/Agent Signature 12- 1'zi• 2v1V Date Part B: To be completed by water utility district 1. The proposed project is within 1 G(k' J i L.}j- / 2. . o improvements required. k;11 (City/County) 3. The improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow requirements of the project before connection and to meet the State cross connection control requirements: NIT (Use separate sheet if more room is needed) 4. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a flow of dei,oa 'gpm at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of / 2, fps as documented by the attached calculations. 5. Water/availability: f Acceptable service can be provided to this project _ Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in Item 8-2 are met. System is not capable of providing service to this project. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. Agenc C -o u stir \ J,4Te-k D i 51- cir i 25 hone 2_06- 2e1 z -95q ,7 By i2 -i6-j3 Date £)(P, RES C12.-1(0-11) Attachmentto Certificate of Water Availability King County Water District No. 125 The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Certificate of Availability ("Certificate") 1. This Certificate of Water Availability is valid only for the real property referenced herein for the sole purpose of submission to the. City of Tukwila ("City"). This Certificate is issued at the request of the City and is not assignable or transferable to any other party. Further, no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency or as a third party beneficiary or otherwise. 2. The District makes no representations, expressed or implied, the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals and authorization from the City or any other applicable land use jurisdiction or governmental agency necessary before applicant can utilize the utility service which is the subject of this Certificate. 3. As of the date of the issuance of this Certificate, the District has water available to provide utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate, and the utility systems exist or may be extended by the applicant to provide service to such property. However, the issuance of this Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant or the City, and the issuance of this Certificate may not be relied upon and does not constitute the District's guarantee that water utility service will be available to the real property at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 4. Application for and the possible provision of District utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate shall be subject to and conditioned upon the availability of water service to the real property at the time of such application, as well as all application for utility service, including conservation, water restrictions, and other policies and regulatio tf�ien in effect. Applicant's Signature Date 12' 1 - 44)1 District Representative y, &,a, �a,,,n�-,�,Q, Date 12 - -13 0400 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L13-0051 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: lit uilding Planning Public Works U Fire Dept. 1❑1 Police Dept. CJI Parks/Rec Project: Conditional Use Permit for PSF mechanical offices in MIC/H zone Address: 11621 East Marginal Way S Date transmitted: 12/27/2013 Response requested by: Jan 10th, 2013 Staff coordinator: Max Baker Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) ji `v' Zit A-dz, Plan check date: f J Comments prepared by: /0L Update date: 0400 TO: City of Tukwila RECEIVE Department of Community Development DEC 30 2013 TUKVVILJA PUBLIC WORK,: File Number L13-0051 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works ❑l Fire Dept. I❑I Police Dept. I❑I Parks/Rec Project: Conditional Use Permit for PSF mechanical offices in MIC/H zone Address: 11621 East Marginal Way S Date transmitted: 12/27/2013 Response requested by: Jan 10th, 2013 Staff coordinator: Max Baker Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) (set A?rA cL Lb P vs u c WaRKs cowth 1f.-M—s Plan check date: Comments prepared by: Update date: IN* CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 11621 East Marginal Way S Tukwila WA 98168 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. ss EXECUTED at Seattle (city), WA (state), on December 12 , 20 13 James P. Reynolds (Print Name) 9322 14th Ave S, Seattle, WA 98108 (Address) 206-764-9663 (Phone Number) ignature) On this day personally appeared before me James P. Reynolds to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/sl. signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THI : 13th OF December , 20 13 Notary Public - State of Washington KARI BREKKE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES January 18, 2017 H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Conditional Use Permit-Jan201 I.docx N • TA • Y PUB in and for the State of Washing residing at 9322 14th Ave S, Seattle, WA 98108 My Commission expires on January 18, 2017 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff is available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Depai tinent of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". ✓ 4. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 5. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule online. 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist (see SEPA Application Packet).SEPA review not required per discussioi PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: with Minnie Dhaliwal 2013.12.09 ✓ 7. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 8. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee 9. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Conditional Use Permit-Jan20l I.docx Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning PROPERTY INFORMATION: Project is exempt from SEPA per discussion with Minnie Dhaliwal 2013.12.09 10. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). ✓ 11. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: Sensitive areas studies not applicable / required per discussion with Minnie Dhaliwal 2013.12.09 1 12. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application) This is your opportunity to highlight the features of your project. 13. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. SITE PLAN: ✓ 14. (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". ✓ (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. ✓ (c) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. 1 (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. ✓ (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. ✓ (f) Loading and service areas. (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls. (h) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. (i) Vicinity Map with site location; does not have to be to scale. LANDSCAPE PLAN• Previous landscape plan from 1995 submittal sufficient per discussion with Minnie Dhaliwal 2013.12.09 15. (a) Landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN• Sensitive areas plans not applicable / required per discussion with Minnie Dhaliwal • 2013.12.09 16. (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20%, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. (d) Proposed lot and tract lines. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Conditional Use Permit-Jan20l I.docx Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning CIVIL PLANS (If any site changes are proposed); Civil plans not applicable / required per discussion with Minnie Dhaliwal 2013.12.09 17. (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See ham://www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwpermit.html for further information. (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. (d) Total expected cut and fill. (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. (f) If additional impervious surface is proposed provide a storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to http://www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwpermit.html. i (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on. FEMA maps. (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. (j) Show planned access to lots, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: Elevations provided to show entry vestibule, exterior balcony, windows and building signage. ✓ 18. If new construction is proposed provide dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. 19. If site lighting changes are proposed provide a luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. ✓ 21. A rendering or photo montage is suggested. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). 22. Any other drawings or materials needed to explain your proposal. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Conditional Use Permit-Jan201 l.docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX.. (206) 431-3665 E-mail.: planning@TukwilaWA.gov ESF` EIRM TL DEC 24 2013 (;OvMIAIJNI I Y DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -CUP Planner: File Number: 13- (,() , Application Complete Date: Project File Number: Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: PSF Mechanical LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 11621 E Marginal Way S, Tukwila WA 98168 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 102304904406 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Bruce Stock Address: Phone: E-mail: 109 Bell street Seattle WA 98121 (206) 443-0494 bstoc . %i o t kandassociates.com FAX: (206) 443-0495 Signature: H:\Land Use Applications in PDFConditional Use Permit-Jan2011.docx Date: ) 2 . Z1 . 7413 0 ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS AS Anchor Bolt 401 Existing ACAcoustic/AlternatingEB Each Current .o Bell AD Area Drain EG End Guard ACT Acoustic Ceiling Tile EJ Expansion Joint ADA Americans W/ Disabilities Act EL Elevation (Grade) ADD Addendum FJEL Electric(el) D Additional ELEV Elevator/Elevaton Pddihon ELM Eliminate bJ Adustable/Adjacent EMER Emergency J.5NF AdsAFF AAboveNshede llFloor Erlarrlag011ed) Power a T GR Aggregate ENC, Enclosed Al a+TR Entrance atlpelosateration EO Equal AMTR AnEarthquake Joint nc ARCH Ahor _ P Equipment ANDD Anodii1e1 (Anodic ES Emergency Shower ARxt Nes x'5014 ga EC Estimate(d) tC tern ACCESS Panel Existing to Remain X Approdmatolly) Exhaust AROItural 5T Elusting AssistantASST Ed. Exposed, Expansion ASSY Assembly Exthrior AUTO AEXT ExtrudedAUX D Ex04 Electricah AV /who Vi ual ENC Water Cooler Aw Acoustic Wall Panel F FaMPnhat /File Drawer F To F Face to Face B AL BC BD SLOG BLKG Brri BM BOT BRG BRKT BS BSC BSMT BT. Balance Bottom of Curb Board Bituminous Building Line Building &ock)ng) Bench Mark Beam Bottom Bearing Bracket Both Sides/Back 5e1 Bio-SaleN Cabinet Basement Bence. CAB Cabinet CARR CARET CS FaanolPBar m Flat Fs Rb board FCU Fan Cal Unit D Drain 993N FoFloorundamon 907* Bre Damper 905 Floor Divider Seip FE Fire Extinguisher FEC Fire Extinguisher Galina! FF Finish Flow For Fire Hydrant MIC Fire Hose Cabinet EHEC Fre Rowena head Machine 5«ew FHML Bag Rack Caper • Mat Screw Carpet Tib d/5 Rat Head Wood Screw FG urn CaCh BasiriChalkboar0 Fished ed Anti,,,,l co Ceiling Diffuser/Cup By Contractor LER Ceramic Fr FlonorMin/Floor 06 Corner Guard FLEX RasNng • Coat Hook ILEX Flexible Channel FLG Range CHEM Chamfer FUR Floor(ng) CP Cast -in -Place (concrete) ete) FWOOR Fluorescent 0.1 Construction Joint F Funnel Dram CR Change Key F.O. Face f... CL Clearance FOG Furnished By Owner CLG Ceiling Installed By Contractor CU Control Joint F010 Furnished And Installed 61x6 Calking By owner CL Closes FP Firepr00oo5ing) Clear FRT. Bre Retardant Tr.1.1 Closer 9R2 Freezer CMF flooring ring m Mastic all5100/11001 Si* Counoasurk Machine Screw Foogng CMIr Corals Mosaic Tilo FIA R Funing GU Concrete Masony Units 9,0 Fabric Wal 004.019 Clean Dioxide Fire FAD Fixed Extinguisher 0 Gas Outlet COL CdurmGauge/Gage COMB Combination/Combustible GGAALT/ Galvanized Communication GB Grab Bar COMP C«nprees(ed)(lon)/ GC Genera Contractor C«ryacl(orHOd))I nil/ GEN Ganera0Genemtor Compt araban) GI Galvanized Iron LMP. Computer GFRs Class Flier Reinforced Concrete Goncrete GONE Conduit, Condition Glue Laminag/Glazed Grid Line CONN Conference LAn Gyp um Lath C005010 n) NP Gypsum Lalh and Plaster CSN 000010c/Co 0GRID71 Ground CONT • r Gemina/Continuous 6PL Gl'nsum %asW CORRD Geminate 04 Gale etl Steel R ▪ Cold Corridor GCB Gyppsumwallbeard /Curtain Rod Grn Gypsum Cs Cup ung in1Countersurk HC Hose CaOinaVHandcap Combination Stand Pipe HON Hallow Core Woodliot and CSV Conductive Sheat Vinyl Cdd Water Ceramic Tile HD Chemical Fume Hood CTG Coating O Hardboard LG Center 1140* Hardwood Cold water (Domestic) Sc HER Header CAS Countersunk Wood Screw HE Horizontal Exit HGT Height O Deep Him HollowdMetal all d Penny Neils) NMu Hall and Hall Masonry DD DoeA Current UN6 Double CRIZ HorizontalDEG epow 9 DEMI Demol Denelition HP Horsepower/High r Pant VEPT pepzr.rent HPL. High Pressure Laminate Der Detail HR Hour DF Drinking FountaiN HS Hook Strip/High Strength Douglas Fir H5KG Housekeeping De0oized Water r Haghi Diameter Niro Heating Diagonal Heater 14044 Heating and Ventilating HVAC HeatingNen5latioNa! Conditioning L HVP Hose Valve Cabinet DIV Dsps4Nividor 14. ryHot Water(Domestic)/Hardware Hardwood Dix Dead Load HyDHydrant Down Door/Oraln GT Infant Changing Table Downspout 67Inside Oianeter/Insde OSP05 Dry Standpipe Dimension OT Drain Tile le that is Ory Dish Wester IG Insulating Glass DWG Drawing(s) MP Imitated Metal Panel DER Drawer el Inch NC Incubator Ncmirenca0dq00000nl Information) ▪ TL 61.11.00/MS1M NvTL Ihsulate(d)(ing) InytrlOr NV Inver yd/ Janitor J-1300 Junction Box • Joist .NT Joint KO Knock Out RP Kick Plate K5 Knee Space oiA cap,. 137 EITb00109lorys) DIR DIrecbr(a) Disconnect V8 LENS) LG LE LAW LN LKR lP LTG LTNT LVR MAC Machine MaintenanceMAT Material ial MAX Maximum Machine Bolt MOE MMeediuum Density Fiberboard STixR MECH Mechanical 01RUC MED Medical/Medium MFG MFR MEP Lead Laboratory Lavatory PW1d(s) Laboratory Cold Water Lineal Foot/Linear Feat Laminated Glass Larrioed LaboratoryHot Water Val Linear Lockei Live o vad Low Point Light Ughtlrg Lower 9M Lower MBR SHE ShSEC alVSh0virg oaring 5HT Sheet SHT SlreeeNl 51 G $h Steel Joist 5cL Skylight SLOG Sliding SLR Sealer Sanitary Napkin Disperser SNT Sealant SPEC S ecltary iflcati Napkin OCfed SPK Sveake, Spacl SPC Spacial R Sprinkler &ware SO 5T 5T Stainless Steel STD standard 5TF Stiffener 5TL Steel STNI Steam STN Slone Storage Straight Structural SUBFL Sublloorling) SUP Supply 51.19 Support SURF Surfppaseceend Sian and Varnish 5V Sheet Vinyl stryc 51. Symmetri cal lCicalm4rg Synthetic SYS System T Top. Tread, Toilet T. Top and Bottom Ts Towel Bar/Tack rc Board Topol Curb/Top al Concrete TD Towel Dispenser TDry Towel Dispenser and Waste TEL Telephone TEMP T eraarture/Tempered Tempered Glass rITempered Tongue 8 Groove 9l,MOThemhostayic) TT -IK TNclgness) Through TJI Truss-Joistlntemational TTOIL TolOC Top er of Concrete Tinge TOR Topping ppro5 Top of Steel TP0 Toilet vas Toilet Paper spenser er Dispenser and Shelf TPH Toilet Paper Holder TRTN Toilet Partition TRD Tread TRK Track T5 Tube Steel TTP Typical Uri0rm Building Code Unless Otherwise Noted IIH0 Unless Noted O0ennse Volts V,VAL Vacuum Outlet VAP Vapor vE Vi abl Vacuum BeakerNapor Barrier toclOrVnBind CT ANcmposiComposition Tile VD Volume Damper VENT Ventilati00Ventlatel Ventilator veRT Vertical VLSI Vestibule VG Vertical Grain VB Vibration me Verify In Field VJ VJoinled Vending Machine VOL Volume VP Veneer Plaster wr Vinyl Tile WC Vinyl Wall Covering IN 01 tts WLdaa'Wes1W0taWater PP With Without 70 While Boar4NJood Base PC Water Closet PGT Washable as able Ceiling Tile tho NNEN Wide Range(Steel) I+, Wire Glass/Wall Grill Water Lew Walk ON (Mal) Work Pant WC Wort neve, Water%oollWoetherproof 0PJ Weakened Rana Joint AR ✓ Waterproof Membrane Waste ReceplaclanoVater Repellent rl • WaResistant Barrier NY Wood S«ews/lNaterstop KGP Weatherstrip/Wet Stand Pipe YUV Welded Sheet Vinyl rvT Weight/Watertight aedre MIA Welded Wire Fabric MMN MSL ML MLOMineral Fiber Board Manufacturing MMsannuuffacturer Motel Flush Pull MinimunYMinute Mirror Miscellaneous Master Key(ed) Metal Lath Moulding MOO hb MCA M9 Movable Partition Mat Recess, Mod Rack MT Mount NITD Mounted MTG Mounting MTL Metal WA Motor ENL M llbn MW Microwave Oven North NEG NC Noott In Contract NO Number 1.NT5 CNI Nominal ol to Scale Outlet 0A Overall/ OB5 Observation OD On Center auricle Diemfer OF OF 0Eide Face/Overflow 090 Overflow Drain 099 Office Overhead/Overhang/ 071-1 Opposite Hand OPN(G) Open(mg) OPP Opposite PB Panic 00574sh Button Particleboard PCL Precast Connote aperp spencer PPCP CD Precast Concrete Penal PON Pencil Drawer Pv Poaer Driven Nail Power Driven 550 P m Pedestal PERF Perforated(d) Farpp Machat PERP Pwular PF Preto rnera P Prefabricate(d) e (a) FG Plate egoar H ▪ Phase Plata vt AM PlasticLaminate PLF Pounds/Linear Foot PLYPO Plywood EMU Pumice Masonry Units Pneumatic PNL Panel POL Pol5peinhle0) PORT Portable PP Push Plate Printer RELM Preliminary PRE_SS Pressure PROD P1ol011ectgon) PRLP Properly PROT Prestrese P5 Pounds Per ed ITSF Pounds Per Square bot PSI POUndso41 Per Square Inch PT Pressure o Dispe reat( ed) wCDBP PaperyiTowel Dispenser PaemenCHande PPR Power m dam Tile/OVad OMR saner GUAR Quantity RB Radius Mbar Base ROT Reflected Ceiling Plan Raceway RD Roof Drain/Road RED Receiving RECEP Reception RECTI Rectangular R50W ReCeivRefrigeratoreatYD Yard Drain REF Refrigerator RENE Reini«ce(d))1119)(menq REL Ras Rodndand Shell REG Require(dyRequirement Resilient RET Return Revision R. REV Room RNID Round RO Rough Claming RIR Return RNL Rainwater Leader 5 CDNC Sealed Concrete SAM Self -Adhered Membrane 50 Sanitary Sc sella c«e sco Seat Cover Dispenser sox Shaver Curtain Rod Soap Dispenser/Soap Dish so Smoke Damp., Section 5F Square Foot (Feet) Symbols ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHICS NORTH ARROW Mame FLOOR ELEVATION Elevation COLUMN GRID SYMBOLS Angle At Centerline Channel Par Perpendicular Plate Round or Phase (Electrical) Diameter Squar Square Feet And Delta Pius or Minus 1O1.a WALL TYPE CENTER LINE INDICATOR DOOR TAG WNDOW TAG PROJECT TEAM ONNER PSF MECHANICAL, NC. ATTR: TMREYNOLDS 9322 A, SOUTH SEATTLE, WA e8108 ARCHITECT STOCK 4 ASSOCIATES, INC. TTN: BRUCE STOCK ATTR: JIW HESSLER 09 BELL STREET SEATTLE, PU. 98121 car 1 STRUCTURAL PGS STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS ENGINEER Arm. JIM HARRIS 620 SEATTLE, IT.,16104 GENERAL TBD CONTRACTOR MECHANICAL/ P5F MECHANICAL PLUMBING ATTN: DAN CUS MAN - WAG ENGINEER ATTM14TH0015 MAR50N-PWMBNG 9322 __IESHIN Tr. Pu,.9510 95105 ELECTRICAL TBD CONTRACTOR / ENGINEER LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR ELEVATION INTERIOR ELEVATION DETAIL CALLOUT VIEW NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SECTION VIEW VIEW NUMBER - SHEET NUMBER REVISION INDICATOR -REYNOLOS.PSFMELN.COM TEL206164.9663 B5T eAI .5TOCKD SOLwTE5.ta4 J STOCKANDA55LATESCOM TEL206.443.0494 -AX206.4430495 JNARRG•PC5-STRUCT.RA-.CO M TEL.206.2925016 Da.thiArrePSPNIECH CC. RMARS N.PSFMECH.COM TEL306.164.9663 LOT 3 OF CITY OF TUNNILA SHORT PUT NO 90-2-55 RECORONG NO 9003121452 SD SHORT PUT OAF - PC9R OF GOV LOT 3 4 OF 5E 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 09-23-04 TGPTI FOR OF GOV LOT 6 a OF 5d/ 1/4 OF NW %4 OF SEDTCN 10-23-04 - BAYS 10 FT RGT OF H 556.51BENG A PT ON RELY MGN SHEET 1 OF 1 FOR R./61. 99 5 118TH ST 3 TO _UNCTION 554 NO 14: /APRON., JULY 23, 1957 5D PT BENG PT OF TANGENCY OF CURVE TWA/ PONT BEARING N 420243E 74651 FT TH SELY ALG 5D N 4 SAID CURVE THRU L/A OF 04-26-56 IRC DISTANCE OF 58.12 FT TH N 41-31-30 499.81 FT TH N 15-27-21 E 75.56 FT TO POB TH 514-32-39 E 212.51 FT TH 5 78-99-54 E 2828 FT TH 5 81-20- 44 5 441.24 FT TAP OF CURVE CONCAVE TO N TH ELY ALG 517 CIRVE RAD OF 110 FT THR.11 C/A OF 15-51-25 ARC DST OF 1.05 FT THIN 82-47-48 E 101.13 FT TO ELY MGN OF POR OF SECTION 9 CONDEMNED N WEER.. COURT CASE NO 646691 TH 5 0706- 23 E 544.81 FT ALONG YESTERLY MARGIN TO A LN 6O FT N OF 4 PL. ENGR B -CNE A5 SHORN ON SHEET 1 OF 1 FOR RAY SR 99 SOUTH 118TH ST TO -UNCTION 5. 1-K MPROVID JAY 23. 1957 TH N 88-10-42 ry 630.57 FT TAP 60 FT RGT OF ENGR STA B 54,00 SAD RAN 64.4 PLANS TH N I FT TAP 10 FT RTST OF .GR STA H 55. SD PT ALSO BENG PT OFCUVEI9 IN ICONCAVE NORTH RAD PT BEARING N 10-1841 148.51 TH TH N d/ EE 4981FTT1 4jI VE Y ALG SD CURTHRI C/A OF 30-0304 ARC DISTANCE OF 392.59 1,21-21 E 75.56 FT TO POB VICINITY MAP GENERAL REQUIREMENTS DRAWING INDEX I 2. 00 NOT SCA E DRr.EN59 FOR DNR0G45. MERE THERE 15 A DISCREPANCY BET*EEN NUTTER OMENSIONS OR COND0ON5 CONTACT ARCHrTKi FOR INTERPRETATION PRIOR TO CO NENCENENT OF CORK THE DETAILS NUE TOPK.LL AND STALL BE USED FOR. LINE AND SMEAR CONDITIONS NOT SHOW, COMMA. ALL PHENSON5 NTH THE ARCHITECT THESE MLI 5 NUE THE...NE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND CAN BE RfPRODUIED ONLY NTH THE PERMEAOI OF THE ARCHITECT. N WHKH CA5f THE REPRODUCTION NOT BEAR THEP. CANES A5 ARCHITECT 3 CONTRACTOR SNA.L YEW, AL OMENS.. DAM., LEVELS AND ALL COM,. AT JOB SITE, INCLUDING BILPNG IND 511E CONDIBONS MDR TO COHNE HONG COR REPORT ALL DECREPANCE5 TO ARCHITECT 4. COMPACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK (Jr ALL TRADES AND SCHEDILf THE CORK TO EXPEDITE COMPLEPO1N OF THE RORK. DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BALDING GRID LINES OR THE FACE OF CONCRETE/ FACE SND GCE. (CHEMISE NOTED. CONSULT WTI THE ARCHITECT REGARDING ANY SUSPECTED ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR CHANGES A PLANS BEFORE PROCEEDING NTH TUE WORK. CONTRACTOR SHILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ILL REWIRED SAFETY PRECAMOS AND ME METHODS, TECHNxaE5, SECIFNCES OR PROCEDURES REWIRED TO PERFORM THE TASK. l CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRA.. AND SHORN& AS REWIRED UNTIL ALL PERMANENT CONNECTIONS AND 5TEFENERS HAVE BEEN NSTALIED B. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BLOC -ENG. BKXNG AND FIVMN6 FOR O GEWOrtc, FIXTURES ELECTRICAL ITEMS, RE5TROON ACCESSORES AND ALL ITERS REOIRNG SANE REPETITIVE FEATURES DRAW ONLY ONCE AVD NOTED AS TYPICAL SHALL BE PROVIDED A51F DRAW Ole NOTED IN FULL IO OR SHALL PROVIDE SHOP DRAWN. FOR ARCHITECTS REVIEW FOR GASEWOM1K, MLLWORK, AND OTHER ITEMS REWIRING CUSTOM SHOP FABRICATION - PER PROELT SPECIFIGAPON II. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL FlRE/N ERGENCT SYSTEMS A5 REOVRED BY ALL APPLICABLE CODES. FRE/EMERGENCY SYSTEMS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT OWED TO, SPRINKLER MODIFICATIONS, FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, NOBLE ALARMS AND STROBES SMOKE AND NEAT DETECTORS AND BM 56N5. CCNIRKTOR SHALL BE RE5PON5BLE FOR PROVIDING ALL WORK AND MATERALn N D ACCORDANCE NTH AL APPLKABLE CODES NCLIA NG CITY, COATY, STATE, FRE, AND KLE55BIL11Y CODES B EACH 5113CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE THE SITE BROOM CEA! AT THE COMPLETION OF 6/HER WORK ALL DEBRIS AND PACKING MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED ER. THE 511E AT INE END OF EACH YIDRK DAT GENERA CONTRACTOR SHALL NE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPRENBSNE FRA CLEANING OF THE SITE. 14 A. NATER L5 TO BE NEW UNLESS NOTED AS USTING 15 CONTRACTOR TO CLEAN ALL DUST ACCUMULATION FROM OVERHEAD HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SURFACES ABOVE THE CEILING LINE PRIOR TO CLOSING GEEING. lB CONTRACTOR TO ACWIIRE ALL REWIRED PERMITS NOT COVERED BY THE BNLDNG PERMIT 1T N ADDITION TO THE DEMOLITION 5FECUISNOW, OWSH , CONTRACTOR ALL CUT, MORE OR REMOVE ITEMS AS NECESSARY TO PROVICE ACCESS OR TO ALLOW ALTERATIONS AND CORK TO PROCEED - INCLUDING ITEMS SUCH AS RE-ROf1NG OF EA5TNG MITES, REMOVAL OF ABANDONED RM. AND REMOVAL OF DEBRIS SUCH A5 ROTTED GOOD, RUSTED HET, AND DETERIORATED CONCRETE. RETURN ALL EPAPMENT TO BE REMOVED TO OWNER. CONDRL011M. tat -mat 11L A0.1 A.0.2 AO .3 COVER SHEET 517E PLAN ELEVATIONS L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OFFCE NSE OYER 20000 SOFT 6111HN MIC -L ZONE CODE INFORMATION 1. OOLONG ADDRESS 11621E MARGINAL PAY 5 TLKWLLA, N495168 PERMIT • PRO.ECT• 3 CODES 4. ZONE 5. TAX ASSESSORS NUMBER 6. CONSTRDCTON TYPE 7. OCOP MDT TYPE 5 SCOPE OF PORK BUILDING PERSPECTIVE FROM ENTRY PERMIT CENTER 6300 Sp TROSTNFR BOULEVARD. SURE 100 TUKWLLA. INA 95188 TEL 206431 3610 2012 BL. 102904904406 TYPE III -N - OFFICE RENOVATION/ ALTERATION/ ADDITION :RECEIVED DEC 24 2013 (,(1 o(i Au1,11 1 T DEVELOPMENT ;STOCK&ASSOCIATES Stock & Associates, Inc. 109 Bell Street Seattle, WA98121 Tel: 206.443.0494 Fax: 206.443.0495 www.stockandassociates.com 0) CC W CC COVER -SHEET - SF: 8(1:- 1/8. _ -0° ((AWN. Author 0HEC KEW, C"Ecker PROJECT" d/0. I0009_ 0/' A0.1 1,‘• 65A VICINITY MAP(NOTTOSCALE 5116TH STREET ;STOCK&ASSOCIATES hit•ctur•.Int•rl•r• Stock & Associates, Inc. 109 Bell Street Seattle, WA 99121 Tel: 206.443.0494 Fax: 206.443.0495 www.stockandassociates.com MONUMENT SIG 0 6 c c — c c c c --- /--(7)COMP- ❑ c c -- _(7°)COMPACT rP'I ° ---- _ _ o I b (7) 11. c NORMAL rl-r-t— (7) NORMAL REGISTERED ARC .BRUC 441u92Tw- . - . 11111) 6 AV AV ap I (6) NORMAL (2) ACCESSIBLE PROPOSED BULLONG SIGNAGE RECEIVE DEC 24 201 D 3 PROPOSED OUTDOOR BALCONY TRUCK LOAD G DOCK EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING LOAONS DOCK (8) NORMAL c (2) COMPACT r-1 (9) NORMAL • — - m -r -r -T (7) NORMAL SITE PLAN 0' 15 30' 60' PROJECT DESCRIP ION RENOVATION OF EKSTNG OFFICE BUILDING, F4TN THE PDDR • OF A SECOND FLOOR ArTHN THE ExSTNG SHELL, ADOMON T ALCOVE ON THE EAST FACADE AND A BALCONYTHE E .T FAY FACADE. ADDITION OF xUTATED GLAZING N THE ExSTNG NEST WORK TO INCLUDE DOORS, MALLS, FNBHES, ELEVATOR, STNRG S - CORAL FRMING AND EXTEROR GLAZING. LEGAL DESCRIPTI LOT 3 OF car OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO 90-2-55- - N GNO 900312148HO 2 SO SRT PLAT DAF- POR OF GOV LOT 3I CFOF NE /4 OF SEL 09-2304 TGW PCR Cr GOV LOT 64 OF SW 1/4• N /4 OF SECTION 10-2304 - BAAP 10 FT RGT OF ENG, STA H 556.51, BENG A PT x N Y MGN SHEET 1 OF l FOR RAN SR 995113TH 5T TO JTON 5511 NO APPROND JULY 23, 1951 SO PT BEND PT OF TANGENCY • CURVE ONT BEARING N 420203E 748.51 FT TH 5ELY ALG SD GN 4 SAO WRVS TH. C/A OF 04-26-56 ARC DISTANCE OF 53.12 FT TH N 131-30E 99.61 FT THIN I5-21-21 E3.56 FT TO PCB TH 574-32-39E 212. FT THS 163934 E 128.28 FT TH 531-20- 44 E 44724 FT TM OF CLAVE CONCAVE TO N TH ELY AIG 5D ' VE RAD OF 110 FT TH. C/A OF 1531-23 ARG DIET OF 47.05 FT TH N 02 148 E 01.13 Ff TO YLY MGN CF POR OF SECTION 9 CONDEMNED N OR COURT CAUSE NO 646.1-1 TH 5 010623E 544.31 FT ALONG WB MARGIN TO A W 80 FT N OF 4 PIn ENG, B -WE AS SHOWN ON 1OF 1 FOR RAN S9 99 SOUTH 118TH 5T TO UNCTION 5511 1. APPROVED LY23, N57 TH N 861042 W 650.81 FT TAP 60 FT RGT OF ENG, STAB SAID RAN PLANS . N 19-41-19 W 359.21 FT TM 70 FT RGT OF ENG' STA H 551.64.9 SD PT ALSO BENG PT OF CANE CONCAVE TO NORTH PT - BEARING N 10-13-41 E 140.51 FT TH NALY ALG 50 CURVE TH. C/A OF 30- 0304 ARG DISTANCE OF 39259 FT TH N 41-57-30 E 499.31 r71HN 15-21-21E 7556 FT TO POB SITE- PLAN PARKING NOTES PROPOSED PARKING N FASTING PARKING LOT. CURRENT NOW, PARKING STALL STANDARDS MET FOR RE5TRPNG OF EKSTNG PARKING LOT TO BUPPORT PRCPCKED USE AND Avon -ION OF USABLE AREA. - SCALE:- F = 30" 0" - - - .DRAWN:_ACH CHECKED: ERS .PROJECT NO- 10009.02_ 0,0140811E STALLS ACCES5BLE COMPACT SPACE AREA 1Ff STANDARD REMISED PROVIDED RECfURED PROVIDED MAfMLM PROVIDED PSF Lt 21,969 SF OFFICE 5.0/1,000 SF M PSF L2 5.447 SF OFFICE 5,0/1,000 5F IN 5 TENANT 7,963 SF OFFICE 5.0/1,000 SF 24 5 (101-150) 6 51 MAXI 1:/23/2013 5.1•.9 P. 14 13 12 11 10 24'- 6• 0 EXISTING MECHANICAL I'(5 n / 1 n n n r X 0 ./- 24' - 6 O n /'1 /1 k JV /1 r /1 , III J I I 1 I 1 b imp nal moni Roo' 29 - O' MIN - - 1 m11 Level02 32-" II • I i ._.II Level 1 OEAST BUILDING ELEVATION - SIGNAGE A SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING ® NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION O Q ./-24'-6• Q OWEST BUILDING ELEVATION n n 24 n n EX15TIN MECHANIC UNITS 24'-6• 24'-6 n n LD 1E1E1 •m EXISTING MECHANICAL UNITE o• O O O Roof r -o" Iv Level 2 Level 1 OSOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION - SIGNAGE Y SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0 n m m 0 0 n n n 6 13 ..2, 6 14 n n 1 Roof 29' - O" LeveI 13'-O" Level 1 SIGNAGE NOTES PROPOSED SIGNAGE IN THREE LOCATIONS: 1. SOUTH ELEVATION LOCATED TOWARDS WEST END AT TOP OF BUILDING (a/- 6'-0" WIDE X 10'-0" HIGH) 2. EAST ELEVATION LOCATED ADJACENT (NORTH) OF PROPOSED MAIN ENTRANCE AT TOP OF BUILDING (a/- 19'-0" VIDE 2 10'-0" HIGH) 3. MONUMENT 5155 AT PARKING ENTRY ON NORTH -SIDE OFF OF 5 116TH STREET (6/- 2-0" NIDE 2 4'-0" HIGH) PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE 15 REVERSE CHANNEL LLI Ith5 AND COMPANY LOGO WITH FACE AND RETURNS CONSTRUCTED OF 1E -GA STAINLESS STEEL AND BACKS CONSTRUCTED OF CLEAR POLYCARBONATE TO PREVENT BIRDS AND OTHER ANIMALS FROM NESTING WITHIN. BUILDING SIGNAGE TO BE MOUNTED APPROXIMATELY THREE INCHES OFF FACADE USING STAND-OFFS TO ALLOW FOR BACKLIGHTING. BACKLIGHTING WOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LED LIGHTS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LIGHT- WEGHTCOMPONENTRY. PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN 15 CONSTRUCTED OUT OF 13 -GA STAINLESS STEEL 1,1171i CUTOUTS FOR COMPANY LOGO AND NAME. CUTOUTS TO BE ENCLOSED BY TRANSLUCENT POLYCARBONATE WTH LED LIGHTING WITHIN. 9ECE VED DEC 24 2013 E 4 Ot24ulLtd1 ;STOCK&ASSOCIATES Stock & Associates, Inc. 109 Bell Street Seattle, WA98121 Tel: 206.443.0494 Fax: 206.443.0495 www.stockandassociates.com CC w I' ELEVATIONS SCALE -As indicated .DRAWN:. Author CHECKED: Checker PROJECT NOi 1-00-09:02- A0.3 1,4• MECHANICAL UNITS `i I 1I G-1 /RIGge Llne _ _ a — m e I — 25._e. Level 2. — P — — —. — —_ _ _ _ II,11111311-4 3. _ O. Levelli ® NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION O Q ./-24'-6• Q OWEST BUILDING ELEVATION n n 24 n n EX15TIN MECHANIC UNITS 24'-6• 24'-6 n n LD 1E1E1 •m EXISTING MECHANICAL UNITE o• O O O Roof r -o" Iv Level 2 Level 1 OSOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION - SIGNAGE Y SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0 n m m 0 0 n n n 6 13 ..2, 6 14 n n 1 Roof 29' - O" LeveI 13'-O" Level 1 SIGNAGE NOTES PROPOSED SIGNAGE IN THREE LOCATIONS: 1. SOUTH ELEVATION LOCATED TOWARDS WEST END AT TOP OF BUILDING (a/- 6'-0" WIDE X 10'-0" HIGH) 2. EAST ELEVATION LOCATED ADJACENT (NORTH) OF PROPOSED MAIN ENTRANCE AT TOP OF BUILDING (a/- 19'-0" VIDE 2 10'-0" HIGH) 3. MONUMENT 5155 AT PARKING ENTRY ON NORTH -SIDE OFF OF 5 116TH STREET (6/- 2-0" NIDE 2 4'-0" HIGH) PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE 15 REVERSE CHANNEL LLI Ith5 AND COMPANY LOGO WITH FACE AND RETURNS CONSTRUCTED OF 1E -GA STAINLESS STEEL AND BACKS CONSTRUCTED OF CLEAR POLYCARBONATE TO PREVENT BIRDS AND OTHER ANIMALS FROM NESTING WITHIN. BUILDING SIGNAGE TO BE MOUNTED APPROXIMATELY THREE INCHES OFF FACADE USING STAND-OFFS TO ALLOW FOR BACKLIGHTING. BACKLIGHTING WOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LED LIGHTS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LIGHT- WEGHTCOMPONENTRY. PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN 15 CONSTRUCTED OUT OF 13 -GA STAINLESS STEEL 1,1171i CUTOUTS FOR COMPANY LOGO AND NAME. CUTOUTS TO BE ENCLOSED BY TRANSLUCENT POLYCARBONATE WTH LED LIGHTING WITHIN. 9ECE VED DEC 24 2013 E 4 Ot24ulLtd1 ;STOCK&ASSOCIATES Stock & Associates, Inc. 109 Bell Street Seattle, WA98121 Tel: 206.443.0494 Fax: 206.443.0495 www.stockandassociates.com CC w I' ELEVATIONS SCALE -As indicated .DRAWN:. Author CHECKED: Checker PROJECT NOi 1-00-09:02- A0.3 1,4• • • • , I• EXISTING L 5CAPE TO REMAIN RECEIVED DEC 24 2013 COMMO:141 i 1 1 DEVELOPMFP1 0 0 q 2 :3 li , g I 1 fi0! I, CZ Co Zeo 00 0 c0 40 I I " r=, •C>1 c0 00 0.1 CO° Co< PROVIDE &1..T44 TRANSITION BETWEEN EXI INC AND PROPOSERADES. REPAIR' DISTURBED L LLN AREAS AS NEEDED. MY 0 111000 APPROVED JUN 3 0 1995 AS NOTED BUILDING DIVISION • afek//7/1#Arii)4610,. *IV /1/7/ MOP— (111v_.7 '*_Frj DRAINAGE ROCK AND 2X4 DEADER ME PETAL: ,c/a/rws • CDLANDSCAPE F>LAN SCALE 1120' Brumbaugh & Associates. Landscape Atchitectam X6Ark Pix4 Slate 117 Kutirt WA 98034SWS . 10FIZIIE 1.112- 05 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY - NOT TO SCALE)