Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit PL13-029 - MUSEUM OF FLIGHT - VACANT PROPERTY / OVERFLOW PARKING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
MUSEUM OF FLIGHT Vacant Property - Overflow Parking Environmental Impact Statement PL1 3-029 E13-012 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director AMENDED NOTICE OF DECISION August 2, 2013 To: Clark Miller, Applicant. King County Museum of Flight, Owner Washington State Department of Ecology King County Assessor, Accounting Division This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170. This notice is approved subject to the decision criteria and conclusions that follow. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: Associated File Number: Applicant: Type of Permit Applied for: Project Description: Location: Comprehensive Plan/ Zoning: SEPA Determination: E13-012 PL13-029 Clark Miller, Director of Facilities Environmental Impact Study / SEPA Planned Action A four inch layer of crushed gravel will be added to a 11,000 88,000 square feet vacant lot (parcel# 5729800010), which is currently used for the overflow parking for the Museum of Flight. A total of twenty two poplar trees are proposed to be removed from the south boundary. The lot will be used for overflow parking during special event anticipated to occur once a year. This property is located between the new Aviation High School and the Museum of Flight's Air Park 9404 East Marginal Way South, tax parcel number 5729800010 MIC/H Project is designated as a Planned Action. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development; cJ Page 1 of 2 08/02/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 6300 Southcenter Boulevard; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Courtney Johnson who may be contacted at (206)431-3662 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Ja 1 Pace, Director and SEPA Responsible Official Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director 190E NOTICE OF DECISION July 29, 2013 To: Clark Miller, Applicant King County Museum of Flight, Owner Washington State Department of Ecology King County Assessor, Accounting Division This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170. This notice is approved subject to the decision criteria and conclusions that follow. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: Associated File Number: Applicant: Type of Permit Applied for: Project Description: Location: 5729800010 Comprehensive Plan/ Zoning: SEPA Determination: G E13-012 PL13-029 Clark Miller, Director of Facilities SEPA Planned Action A four inch layer of crushed gravel will be added to a 11,000 square feet vacant lot (parcel# 5729800010), which is currently used for the overflow parking for the Museum of Flight. A total of twenty two poplar trees are proposed to be removed from the south boundary. The lot will be used for overflow parking during special event anticipated to occur once a year. This property is located between the new Aviation High School and the Museum of Flight's Air Park 9404 East Marginal Way South, tax parcel number MIC/H Project is designated as a Planned Action. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. Page 1 of 2 07/29/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Boulevard; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Courtney Johnson who may be contacted at (206)431-3662 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Jack ace, Director and SEPA Responsible Official Depa ment of Community Development nCi o Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayo, Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Directo, MEMORANDUM July 29, 2013 To: Jack Pace, Director From: Courtney Johnson, Planning Intern RE: Permit E13-012 SEPA PA for the Museum of Flight's vacant property for overflow parking Project File: PL13-029 Project Description: A four inch layer of crushed gravel will be added to the vacant lot (parcel# 5729800010), which is an approximately 11,000 square foot lot and is currently used for the overflow parking for the Museum of Flight. A total of twenty two poplar trees are proposed to be removed from the south boundary. The lot will be used for once a year event parking lot. This property is located between the new Aviation High School and the Museum of Flight's Air Park. The east boundary is east Marginal way S; the north boundary reflects the fire access lane at the High School and the west boundary is the at the fence line that is adjacent to the High School parking lot. The Museum of Flight is an existing institution established to showcase the surrounding aerospace industry. Proponent: Clark Miller, Director of Facilities Location: 9404 East Marginal Way South Date Checklist Received: June 16, 2013 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Challenges to Documents: Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: None Washington State Department of Ecology Recommendations: Designate the project as a Planned Action as set forth in TMC 21.04.152. Decision Criteria: The site is within the project area for the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. The Integrated Plan and Final EIS were completed in March 1998. Both the Duwamish Corridor redevelopment EIS and the Tukwila Manufacturing/ Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement analyze the environmental impacts of a range of development and redevelopment alternatives on properties in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center corridor. The determination of whether a project fits the Planned Action criteria is divided into two phases. 1. In the first phase, a determination is made whether the project satisfies all of the following characteristics to first qualify as a Planned Action: A. The action is a "permitted use" located within the MICA (TMC 18.36.020) and MICA/ (TMC 18.38.020) zones and/or is an accessory use (TMC 18.36.030 respectively). Response: The zoning for this property is Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H). The existing vacant lot is used for overflow parking for special events and no change of use is proposed. Parking areas are allowed as an accessory use in the MIC/H zone. B. The Action is: a. Not an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200 and TMC 18.06.270, b. Not a conditional or unclassified use, in the respective MIC/L or MICA/ zones, c. Not a development, any portion of which includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark, d. Not a development associated with 16th Avenue South Bridge construction activities. Response: The project is not an essential public facility, is not a conditional or unclassified use in the MIC/H as defined by the zoning code, it is not located waterward of the ordinary high water mark, and doesn't involve the 16th. Avenue S. Bridge. 2. Once the project has met the initial test to qualify as a planned action, it must then show the following : A. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please document all mitigation measures, using attachments if necessary. Response: The project will comply with all applicable City and State Codes, fees, and approvals and all impacts of the proposal will be mitigated by compliance with applicable codes. B. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? TMC 21.04.154 requires that the Comprehensive Plan policies that are to be reviewed are those identified in the "Integrated GMA Implementation Plan Environment Impact Statement for the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center." Comprehensive Plan Consistency Criteria that apply includes: Policy 11.1.5: Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while limiting unrelated uses. Response: Maintaining the vacant lot for special event parking once a year supports the history of the surrounding airplane and aerospace industry. cJ W:\Users\CourtneyJohnson\M useum_of_flight\E13-012\2013_29_13_SR.doc Policy 11.1.9: Reduce reliance on the single- occupancy -vehicle for transportation of employees in and out of the MIC. Response: Upkeep and maintenance of the Museum of flight's vacant parking lot provides more parking spaces during special events for carpools. Goal 11.1: Support the existing industrial activities in the MIC and development of new industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people to Tukwila in the region, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods. Policy 11.1.5: Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while prohibiting unrelated uses. Policy 11.1.8: Improve public access and use of the west side of the river, protecting owner's rights to reasonable use and enjoyment, improve employee access to the east side of the river and emphasize restoration on both sides of the river. Conclusion The current proposal to maintain a vacant parking lot for special events hosted by the Museum of Flight once a year is consistent with the criteria for approval as a Planned Action. Parking is allowed as an accessory within the MIC/H zone. Work proposed with the underlying permit satisfies all other criteria contained in TMC 21.04.152. Proposed actions associated with this project are consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, and all impacts associated with the current proposal will be mitigated. Attachments: A. Proposed Site Plan B. SEPA Planned Action Checklist C. SEPA Checklist dated June 13, 2013 by Clark Miller, facilities Director. Prepared by: Courtney Johnson, Planning Intern Date: July 29, 2013 CJ W:\Users\CourtneyJoh nson\Museu m_of_flight\E 13-012\2013_29_13_SR.doc 0400 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: f❑I Building Planning In Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: ` f01 CM14— Comments prepared by`! Address: . F.:,�'�1ccr )nai W 5, Jp so �2"'c� PI�c Date transmitted: /q)) Response requested by: ---)/2 / `'/ [ Staff coordinator: jd&r�2AA %Q iv—i—) s 7a7 Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) • \t�e,\r-Ngs y,, -D `-OV►1/KR 1.7k3 a (3 *l1MA Plan check date: -1\1 `3 Comments prepared by`! TCW\51 Update date: Tukwila Fire Department Interdepartmental Memo July 17, 2013 To: Courtney Johnson, Planning From: B/C Tomaso, Fire Marshal RE: E13 — 012 Here are the comments from fire for this project based on the submitted documents. 1) Fire has no comment at this time. 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works 0 Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: cGCn-I--- Giro /of prop Crni 4 U rt,fc(ncl L) Address: F- Mar 1Mal s• Ono s, c znd pioCe, Date transmitted: —1 J-- ") 7j Response requested by: ( J 2 2// �]- Staff n O u rim,' (�jOktr7soj) Date pcoordinator: received:resonse REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) vf 1 _7 ir / J e /-4, L „,0.7 �f Plan check date: 7., 9./ / (� Comments Update date: by: - prepared 0406 TO: RECEIVED City of Tukwila TJUL' 08 2013 Department of Community Development TUXW Il.H PUBLIC WORKS File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building l Planning Public Works In Fire Dept. Police Dept. ❑I Parks/Rec Project: \ , v11(% + 9 ro -e_fr ) ok propo- YY'a i n - i7 ce, aro/ v -e Address: ET MCI ai wV s- arid 500-f-� %2 72d plate Date transmitted: 1 1 �j J 3 Response requested by: / 2 2//3 Staff coordinator: C 0(//'- 7 ) 0 aJ Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 6-11(ite-8 j.44 nt 2013 pwc.0LA,AAs_ Plan check date: , 1 13 Comments prepared by: ( I Update date: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards DATE: July 11, 2013 PROJECT: Vacant Gravel Lot Property Maintenance and Upkeep 9229 E Marginal Way S. REVIEW #: 1 PROJECT NO: E13-012 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 431-2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) Applicant needs to specify what type/size of crushed gravel will be placed. Only clean crushed gravel consisting of clean fractured rock to eliminate the potential for high sediment transport. 5/8" chip rock. 2) Page 7 of SEPA check list under Water Runoff states "All water will seep into the ground as currently does". It doesn't mention the existing storm drainage system on site. The Aviation HS plans approved under permit D10-031 civil drawings C2.01, C4.01, C4.02, C6.01, and C6.02 show an existing storm drainage system with several catch basins that tie into Aviation HS storm drainage system. Applicant needs to clarify this issue. A plan showing the existing drainage patterns and protection of these structures during gravel placement will be required. Four catch basins tie into the Aviation HS storm drainage system. I believe the drainage patterns can be seen on C2.01. The four 10" SD's connect to the 12" SD which connects to the 27" SD to the outfall. During grading and gravel the SD's will be protected. 3) Who (provide name and phone number) has the maintenance responsibility for this segment of the storm drainage system and what are the maintenance tasks and schedule. Aqua Clean Jet -N -Vac at (425) 271-5459 will have the maintenance responsibilities. 4) Gravel shall be placed in such a manner that the existing drainage patterns shall be maintained; otherwise existing CB's will need to be adjusted to new grades. It will be ensured that existing drainage patterns are maintained. 5) How tall will be the new fence? Will there be a gate for pedestrian or vehicular access along E Marginal Way South? The fence will be 6' chain Link. There will be one pedestrian gate to access the sidewalk along E Marginal Way. 6) Public Works type C construction permit will be required for proposed activities. OK (W:Joanna/Comments 1 E13-012.doc PW) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards DATE: PROJECT: REVIEW #: PROJECT NO: PLAN REVIEWER: July 11, 2013 Vacant Gravel Lot Property Maintenance and Upkeep 9229 E Marginal Way S. 1 E13-012 Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 431-2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) Applicant needs to specify what type/size of crushed gravel will be placed. Only clean crushed gravel consisting of clean fractured rock to eliminate the potential for high sediment transport. 2) Page 7 of SEPA check list under Water Runoff states "All water will seep into the ground as currently does". It doesn't mention the existing storm drainage system on site. The Aviation HS plans approved under permit D10-031 civil drawings C2.01, C4.01, C4.02, C6.01, and C6.02 show an existing storm drainage system with several catch basins that tie into Aviation HS storm drainage system. Applicant needs to clarify this issue. A plan showing the existing drainage patterns and protection of these structures during gravel placement will be required. 3) Who (provide name and phone number) has the maintenance responsibility for this segment of the storm drainage system and what are the maintenance tasks and schedule. 4) Gravel shall be placed in such a manner that the existing drainage patterns shall be maintained; otherwise existing CB's will need to be adjusted to new grades. 5) How tall will be the new fence? Will there be a gate for pedestrian or vehicular access along E Marginal Way South? 6) PW type C construction permit will be required for gravel placement. (W:Joanna/Comments 1 E13-012.doc PW) CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov SEPA PLANNED ACTION APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -PACT Planner: File Number: '611)---0/2— 611)-r0 2Application ApplicationComplete Date: Project File Number: -pc._ / -L 9 Application Incomplete Date: MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96-0034 Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Vacant gravel lot property maintenance and upkeep LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. E. Marginal Way S. and S. 92nd Place. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 5729800010 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: E-mail: Clark Miller 9404 E. Marginal Way South, Tukwila, WA, 98108 (206) 768-7149 cmiller@ useupofflight.org `,. Signature: ("V FAX: (206) 764-5707 r7/77,7/7/ Date: i)111 3 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 8 2013 PERMIT CENTER Clark Miller Director of Facilities Direct: 206.768.7149 Cell: 206.437.4072 cmiller@museumofflight.org 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108-4097 Tel: 206.764.5700 Fax: 206.764.5707 www.museumofflight.org IMEINEO CIPIXEIN CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, ngineers, contr tors or othe representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at j Z Z ? E. �j j % yyJitIJ for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necess to complete-fhat purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the Toss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. /;-7---/-1/ � EXECUTED at �,�!/,%j 1 (city), �% (state), on ,.,,/G1 11 , 20' 3 74)1e / /hi to D. 1114, 4.s w%OONu 1"10 aIft, N£ s % fl3 °NM tNC1 je (Print Name) y - (1)1,e)9 -e �.�Q/ /(4 (Address) zb� 7eg "7-#3 (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me l kr 1 V CI\ 1 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that 'she signed the same as /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. e24 -in ` s^'1 ,^ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 1, J`+DAY OF NOTARY PU$L!C in and fo residing at X11` My Commission expires on the State of Washington , 2013 l)-) _ lam- macs_ PLANNED ACTION CRITERIA CHECKLIST To determine if the proposed project meets the criteria for consideration as a planned action please answer the following questions: 1. Is the proposal a permitted and/or accessory use located within the MIC/L (TMC 18.36) or MIC/H (TMC 18.38) zones? Uses listed as "conditional" or "unclassified" are not eligible for the planned action process. As 2. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please document all mitigation measures, using attachments if necessary. N 3. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? No 4. Is the proposal any of the following: a. an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200 or TMC 18.06.270; No b. a development related to the Regional Transit Authority light rail or commuter rail system; No c. a decision about the 1 6th Avenue Bridge improvement or disposition which would normally require a SEPA threshold determination; or No d. a development in which any portion includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark? No If the answer to any of questions "a" through "d" is yes, the proposal is not eligible for the planned action process. SEPA CHECKLIST STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Vacant gravel lot property maintenance and upkeep. 2. Name of Applicant: The Museum of Flight 3. Date checklist prepared: 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): July 2013 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. This is a property maintenance and upkeep project. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No H:V.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Agency Comments Page 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Public Works permit and SEPA planned action. 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. We propose to remove 22 poplar trees, smooth out roughly 11,000 square feet and then add a 4" layer of crushed gravel on the vacant gravel lot parcel #5729800010. This lot is located between the new Aviation High School and the Museum of Flight's Air Park (Concord, Air Force One, etc.), The south boundary being the tree line; the east boundary being E. Marginal Way S; the north boundary being at the fire access pathway at the High School and the west boundary being at the fence line at the adjacent to the High School parking lot. -see attached map red line markings. This lot will be used for overflow vehicle parking only once per year. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The closet street address is 9229 E. Marginal Way S, an unfinished vacant gravel lot within parcel #5729800010 described above. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 2 SEPA Supplement, Applicant Responses page 2: 10. We propose to remove 22 poplar trees, remove old chain link fence along tree line and E. Marginal Way South, smooth out roughly 88,000 square feet then top with -1,100 yards crushed gravel, and install new chain link fence in areas mentioned above on the vacant gravel lot parcel #5729800010. This lot is located between the new Aviation High School and the Museum of Flight's Air Park (Concord, Air Force One, etc.), The south boundary being the tree line; the east boundary being E. Marginal Way S; the north boundary being at the fire access pathway at the High School and the west boundary being at the fence line at the adjacent to the High School parking lot. -see attached map red line markings. This lot will be used on occasion for overflow vehicle parking only. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): mountainous, other: rolling, hilly, steep slopes, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Most of the site has slopes of 1% to 3%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. From the SEPA prepared for the Aviation High School. 1.FilI 2. Upper Alluvial deposits, 3. Finer grained lacustrine silt and clay, 4. Dense estuarine deposits. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. From the geotechnical report prepared for the high school project by Geoengineers, "The results of our liquefaction analyses indicate that layers of sand and silt are susceptible to liquefaction during a design -level earthquake to an approximate depty of 60 feet. Liquefaction is characterized by the loss of soil strength in soils located below the groundwater level during seismic shaking which results in ground settlement. We estimate that ground settle in the range of 6 to 10 inches could occur during a design earthquake." e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. See page 2, #10. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 3 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 0% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Any rain water soaks into the ground already with no erosion concerns. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Page 4 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Duwamish River approximately 325' away. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None H:\Land Use Applications in PDnSEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Page 5 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No H:V.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. All storm water will seep into the ground as it currently does. . Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None, it drains good now. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Page 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ./Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other — Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other — Shrubs Grass Pasture _ Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk Cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ✓ Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Weeds will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan20l 1.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None H:\land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 9 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None . Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 10 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Overflow vehicle parking between the Aviation High School and the Museum of Flight Air park. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No n:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 11 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? None g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan20I l.doc Page 12 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Zero j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Zero k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 13 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None H:Uand Use Applications in PDFSEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A I-I:\Land Use Applications in PDFVSEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 15 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation /a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No I b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 16 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. This site will be accessed through the Aviation High School parking lot at E. Marginal Way S. and S. 92nd Place. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, King County Metro Transit c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No H:\Land Use Applications in PDFVSEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 17 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A H:\Land Use Applications in PDF SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Page 18 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: None b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None H:\Land Use Applications in PDFVSEPA Planned Action-Jan20 1 1 .doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 19 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Page 20 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan20l I.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 21 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. D. SIGNATURE SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete tg 1e best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 17/ 3/1-� H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Planned Action-Jan2011.doc Page 22 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300:outhcenter:Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Teli'phone (206)431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 Email: tukplankttukwila.wa.us BINDING SITE [IMPROVEMENT PLAN NUMBER L11-019 DECIA$ATION K9 b all men.liy Nese presenrth8t we, the undersigned_ owner(s) in fee simple of the land In rein descabed do hereby make a Binding Site Improvement Plan thereof pursuant to . 1RCW 58.03.035. The undylsigned.further declare this Binding Site Improvement Plan to be the graphic representation of said Biridin_g Site Improvemgrit Plan and the same is made with the free consent pnd in accordan with the desire of -the owner(s). _ , f9ti and ter.#'- �-f.: . In 4iithess v�ereof:ue have s�otir ands and eal� -:'ITS: l' (2?.� rAt+•-A� Named`"-.'•."•r'lT.."^ •' � r'^•'.•"P6i rAlt1 BRH BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323-4144 • • '• :125. Name. STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King - • 1 On this day personally appeared before me lit LJ'("L it: •('u1 vt A to me known to be the individual who executed the 'thih and foregoing insirumersyi and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/h&voluntary act and deed for the . • ae% u4rN,f�e�yehttTqRp,e therein mentioned. Esy,dO, hafd,ffl day o ,20 t / .4ssfoyy,,. /! �„� '= `mili�ature:`,e-f/e!�„' • • m` zi %%%�% VBLtG Name as commissioned:,¢f/�'l%�l/idp ?/5,12"`_02 1 0 ”" t G4 le: /% 67'11 2(,% W % My appointment expires: q(5-- LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Oliver O. Robar, registered as a land surveybt by the State of Washington, certify that this plat is based on an actual survey of th,lbnd described herein, conducted by me or under my supefvisi¢'rl; that the distances,'courses and ahgfesare shown hereon correctly; and Ih t r"hplfu fm�-entfs 'Finer than those monuments approved far geeing ata later date, have bee s t and )oF cbmers staked on the grpund s depicted on the p81 . �/�',t;�n ��?� Olivei•d_Rbtiar, P.L.S. 45170•-' I I APPROVALS KING NTY FINANCE DIVISION . I certify taxes are paid ajld that a deposit h�'S,be n i mufbdent amount to pay tt)e taxes.tor the follow9g year; that th to no delinquent special assessments gertified to this -off- for collection' d1hel all special assespinents on any of the property herein dedicoiK -aistr , alleys; or for other publicyse are paid in . - R,11 •7 1-'\Y This- • King C5p • reasurer Deputy King C iunty Treasure KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL • Examined and approved by the Department of Assessments day of King County Assessor Parcel Number(s) ,'' L :) - Deputy Assessor TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this 3, day of '..0V` I ,201) -6.C. Chairpersdnj hort Subdivis mmittee SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 33, T. 24N., R.4E., W.M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON III I IIILII'I III I. II II IN1III'll 20110504001579 CHICAGO TITLE PLRT 128. 0 "IIS P00E-001 OF 003 05/04/2011 15:18 at m nutes past M, and KING COUNTY, UR — O volume S 7 of Plats, On page S8' , records of King County, Washingtq' • w King County Manager LOrI'bine P414,Typfvecords and Elections PROPOSED LOT 1 DESCRIPTION LOT 2, CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20070228900007, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND; THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20070228900007, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN TRACTS 1 AND 2, THE MEADOWS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, BEING A PART CF FRANCIS MCIIATT DOOvTIO',. LAt:D CLAII.I NC. 38 1`1 SECT1Cr. 33, Ti'.vt:S.'o 24 NORTH, RA' /9E 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 W1TH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY N0. 1 (EAST MARGINAL WAY) WHICH POINT 15 648.77 FEET DISTANT SOUTHEASTERLY, MEASURED ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, FROM THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRANCIS MCNATT DONATION LAND CLAIM; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY A DISTANCE OF 715.4 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 8'01' FROM NORTHWEST TO WEST WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY A DISTANCE OF 122 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 17 FEET DISTANT SOUJHW8S1EVET"-MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES. FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONE` A STRAIGHT LINE PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE OF HIGHWAY A DISTANCE OF .603 FEET, MORE OR LESS,?TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2; Pit Nt ."• AST ALONG SAID 2ORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 18.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. C'EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED %LAND -:j3EGINNING AT THE NORTHE9ST: CORNER OF SAID LO'F 2. SHE/RT. PLAT NUMBER L05-057; .-:THENCE SOUTH 2,31'9 "EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE:•'OF 8076. LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057, A •--' DISTANCE OF 20.$7 FELT; - - THENCE 54 JTH:30'54'51' WEST, A DISTAL OF 28.79'--EET TO Tt1E TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF EXCEPTION; THENCE}SOUTH 01'09'08" WEST, A DISTANCYrOF 76.19 )'E$-1. THEN. SOUTH 2217'1:5' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22.70 TO A _POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 32'44'34' WEST AND I5 303.55 FEET DISTANT: FROM THE SOUTHEAST COI?NER'O9:SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057; THENCE NORTH 880'53" WEST_-A�ID:.p?.RALL€L WITH Ty{.NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER 4<65-057, A DISTANCE OF 435-82 FEET TO -:A POINT W111011 BEARS NORTH 42'47'07' EAST AND I5 350.67 FEET •-.=DISTANT FROM,7HE SOUTHWE;ti1' CORNER OF SAID LOT -2: SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057; THENCE NORTH 01'09'07" E8'ST, A DISTANCE OF 99:.50 FEET TO IS 41.00 FEET SOUTH OF .THE (2) RECORD OF SURVEY REC. NO. 20070427900001. VOL. 2.57 PAGE p$8 ORIGINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: LOT 2, CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20070226900007, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057. RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20070228300007. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN TRACTS 1 AND 2, THE MEADOWS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, BEING A PART OF FRANCIS MCNATT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38 IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY N0. 1 (EAST MARGINAL WAY) WHICH POINT I5 648.77 FEET DISTANT SOUTHEASTERLY, MEASURED ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, FROM THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRANCIS MCNATT DONATION LAND CLAIM; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY A DISTANCE OF 715.4 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 8'01' FROM NORTHWEST TO WEST WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY A DISTANCE OF 122 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 17 FEET DISTANT SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY LINE OF HIGHWAY A DISTANCE OF 603 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 18 5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. REFERENCES: (1) RECORD OF SURVEY REC. NO. 20051219900013. HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83/91 NORTH LINE :OE SAID LOT.2, SHORT P957 NUMBER .L05-057. WHEN MEASURED AT ARIGHT ANGLE; THENCE SOUTH 88'50'5,3° EAST AND' PARALLEL_ :WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOP:2, SHORT PLAT NEMBER (3) CITY OF SEATTLE ENGINEER'S MAP. L05-057( A DISTANCE --OF 128A0•FEET TO TH -.BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO -DIE SOUTH AND A RADIUS OF 30.57.0 FEET; 300.1/3 .-•-'•:- .(4) LAND CORNER RECORD REC. NO. 20050519000841. THENCE'SQUTHEASOERLY ALONG SAID CURIE A 0)STANCE OF .2+75 FEET -:1D THE BEGINNING OF.: -A 'REVERSE - CURVE CONCAVE..TO THE NOR7H AND A RADIUS OF -3000 FEET;-.-' (5) CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE A:OISTANCE OF 22.06 FEET;•NO. BLA-01-002, REC. NO. 20010803900001. THENCE SOUTH 88'50'53"'EAST, A DISTANCE OF:72.98 FEET: To THE BEGINNING OF'k''CURVE•CONCAVE TE1'THE NORTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF -.72-.88 FEET: -• - - -(.G)_ CALCULATED THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 29.76:FEET: THENCE NORTH 67'28'08" EAST A DISTANCE OF 2,15 FEET TO _TWE TRUE_ •P-GINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 246,255 SO. FT. OR 5.65.3.6„ACRES OF LAND. MORE -"C5R LESX," • TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS; ACCESS ANb' i11:1E(TY,EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECQBDED UNDEQ•'KING COUNTY RECORDING N0. 20100927002030 AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECOBDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20100927002029. • PROPOSED LOT 2 DESCRIPTION • A PORTION OF LOT 2, CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING. NUMBER 20070228900007, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057; THENCE SOUTH 22'31'52" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057, A - DISTANCE OF 20.27 FEET; ' THENCE SOUTH 30'51'51" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF EXCEPTION; THENCE SOUTH 01'09'08' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 76.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22'17'19' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22.70 TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 32'44'34" WEST AND 15 303.35 FEET DISTANT FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057; THENCE NORTH 88'50'53" WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2. SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057, A DISJAN8@'00'u 435.82 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 42'47'07" EAST AND IS 350.67 FEET DISTANT FRQM'THE SOUTHWEST'CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057; THENCE •NORTH 01'09'07" EAST. A 'DISTANCE OF 99.50 FEET TO A POINT THAT IS 41.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE ••NIORTH•LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER L05-057 WHEN MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE; .-:•. THENCE SOUTH 88;50'53'_. EAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NUMBER OF L05-057, 30.00 AFEEDISJ:'T,AN'CE OF'if26d10- FEET: TO THE 18p11.490 OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND A RADIUS •Yi%G iB •--(HENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AL012G- SAIP-CURVE-A DISTANC1'OF 2.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE .'.CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH A0JD.••A RADIUS OF 30.00:FEET; .-.'THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE A DIANCE OF 2206 FEET; :: THENCE S4k)TH 8'50:53" EAST, A DISTANCETOF 72.98 --FEET TO THE BEGINNING:.OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE .NORTH AND '840890 'A 'RADIUS OF 72.58. FEET; .-.' •.THENCE EASTERLY ALONC•'SA)D CURVE .A. DISTANCE _OF 29.76 FEET; *NCE NORTH 67'28'08" E 18T A DISTANCE OF 295 FEET TO ERE TRUE POINT' OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING,g: 3AOF REA•41,500 $A. FT. OR 0/"527 ACRES •ESF LAND, MORE OR LESS. -`- --•„ TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING -EASEMENTS; ACGESS AND:UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER KING -.. _ COUNTY RECORDING N0. 20106927002030 AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING N0. 20100927002029.:• '• `,:' :1' THIS BSIP ALLOWS CERTAIN ZONING STANDARDS (MINIMUM PARKING, SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING, LQT''AREA AND••'• • GENERAL NOTES AND EASEMENTS•.•..- , LOT DIMENSIONS) ON THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS TO BE MODIFIED: PROVIDE0:THE STAND#RDS FOR THE' -ENTIRE CENTER ARE MET. ZONING STANDARDS APPLY TO THE INTERGRATED SITE 95 A WHOLE, -LVOT CONSIDERING INDIVIDUAL LOT LINES. T1-115 BSIP ALLOWS PHASED INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS_ INLCUDING LANDSCAPING STANDARDS TO OCCUR CONCURRENT WITH DEVELOPMENT IN INDIVIDUAL LOTS. •• AN ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO,' 20100927002030 AND AMENDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20110202001697,-. AND .A RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20100927002029. • • FOR THE PURPOSES OF SIGNAGE, THIS PROJECT IS CONSIDERED PART OF THE MUSEUM OF FLIGHT PREMISED WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE SIGN ALLOWANCES FOR THE ENTIRE MUSEUM OF FLIGHT CAMPUS. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PHASED TO INCLUDE PHASE 1 AS DEPICTED AND FUTURE FRONTAGE LANDSCAPING TO OCCUR AT THE TIME THAT LOT 1 IS DEVELOPED (SEE SHEET 3). OWNER(S): MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION ADDRESS: 9404 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH PHONE: (206) 764 - 5702, MATTHEW B. HAYES CITY/STATE/ZIP: SEATTLE, WA 98108 DRAWN BY (M) MEASVP.ED VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 1/2" BRASS ?LUG IN CONC. Lri M©N CASE . REF.N,E'.• N8'S3"W ,•:2717.55'(C)•-.'-• D.N.F. 2717.66' (2).". 2717.72'(3)` UI N •• N Do N O I N O A N N 0 N88'08'33"W 2717.66'(2) 2717.72'(3) 1-FND PUNCHED BRASS ( INSERT IN 5"x5" CONC. 1! MON., — 9/1993 1408.19'(M) 1407.85(3) ' N1 m 250 822'31'51"E ` 1 648.77' N88'52'08"W 2 - x.04 w i„w-•. S135134"E > (•11 m '237.76' (,'7; IN . 1643.96'(C-1) • 568'05'02"E 2620'4etc) • '2620,33'(2) 'EMPTY MON•'EAE, 2620'32'(3) 1576.78' LS8S.SO.S3E 953.41' 'SITE • • • • • no ur, r 2,A P9 1,0 .,9 `per 2620.4613) 2620. J 33 (2) zz 'r' z ?On m zm m 0 • o 0 Z Z E?o 572.76'(M) 572.68'(3) D.N.F. mIn m a n ZiTiN N N S88'05'02•'E, ,- 2620.41'(C) N1'08'23"E :.337r36'(C) -• BINDING SITE°IMPROVEMENT PLA MUSEUM OF FLIGHT OQR DATE APRIL 2011 • ,=JOB NUMBER_ 2001047.10 CHECKED BY OOR SCALE WA SHEET City of Tukwila gterraqrrient of Community Development :93130 SOlithqenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone./206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail:takplanptukwila.wa.us BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN N..01V1BER.Ifi 1-019 NEW LOT 2 — NEW LOT UNE NEW LOT 1 SET REBA,Ef & CAP LS#45170CORNER EXISTING FIRE 0 \ N88'5053W 101.95 N2172'53"W•...-.• HYDRANT tf, • BNSF BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD. RIGHT OF WAY INGRESS, EGRCE6 & UTILITy .. EASEMENT GRANTED UNDER . UCORDIN G NO.. -200702280B893 RECORDING -pr THIS B5,10 SET REBAR & CAP ;CT° BE AMENOD FOLLOWThiG THE • : - • :' LOT 2 -L.OT CONFIGURATION NO SCesLE 1 8 SHORT TERM PARKING SPACES PAINTED STRIPING, PAINTED TRAFFIC TYP. CURB. TYP. :5.1-10.R.:,IT- TERM ,•••••:"F,V-915.°°'217..-.1t=72.58 • ,N67. -0013.E 300: :PARKING SPACES b=2.75 : • OVERHANG LEVEL 2 - 14 PARKING SPACES • :•. (6 ADA SPACES) •.... 17 PARKING SPACES LOADING AREA 17 PAeKING SPACES PARk.ING SPACES " (COMPACT) BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323-4144 NEW LOT UNE. GRAPHIC SCALE HIGH SCHOOL 12 PARKING SPACES N88'50'53-18 435.82' NEW LOT UNE FIRE ACCESS PATHWAY 10WIDE GATE WITH KNOX BOX \ -.. \ :V; _.: • \ .••••• -s\. r7\ `‘.1.\ \h•lik‘ .1110v,,, MIT 1. os \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • \ 1.- \ ,\ , / , I' 20 WIDE GATE V e -, .111111111111%%%‘' NI II 1' 0 .;., ,..,' sr, \ N \ \ \ :§ PARKING SPACES ' ' • 11111111, WITH KNOX BOX -.\ u, Ei' IIIIIIIII °..,, \ -..,, \ \ \ . \ COMPACT). -...:11 •-• . SPAcE,S - • . .. . 7 PARKING •• DIMENSION FROM THE SOUTHEAST LOT \ • \\\ \ Ls. 0° 1111111111 \CORNER Of PROPOSED LOT 2 TO THE SOUTHEAST BUILDING CORNER; \ • hilr\ ..* 11111 d11111 111 ou\i, \ .::'....- .1 ..... .- • ' .::...----.........----.' .LOTN, 1 -• N88'5053 - W 21.80 ' \\ \- . . , • \\ 'dill 4 - . PARKING '.•. • ' -' •• ' -• " .. •-• -. • 24Q ,2 55 ±SQ.FT.-,- - • \ ‹ok", :'.5.653i "YAC. -RES SPACES - ' 11111111FLI:] • . "•• - - .•."- 9401-:eAST MARGINAL WA); ..SEATTLE, WA• -98108 :" IvIltUA.4- OF FLIGHT ...„.„--."--'- `,:. PARC -- • .. 50''C'C' • 16 PARKENG: • ....• 542260002002 .•.' . • :•:. .."• ' ..---•- - . i,ikot-11 .- -- ' - • . 5C- \ :f.S#45170. • . - ". •.ET REBAR.'ac :CAP \.. \ \ . ''..-- . •*- • • - - SET REBAR & CAP LS#45170, 3' N. OF CORNER N8507.04”E 119.00' SET REBAR & CAP LS#45170, 1' N. OF CORNER MEAN HIGHTIDE S83•07.56 200' SHORELINE SETBACK 117.00' — SET LEAD Sc TACK W/SHINER LS#45170 SET REBAR & CAP LS#45170, 4' N. OF CORNER S8545.513% 48.6.97' -• - PROP05.ED SITE PLAN AFTR (DEVELOPMENT APPROVEla'qNDER coc'e 27%. 9 c, oC;% LI, VaCi —o • o, • r e rtPCe 0 7 0 0 LA BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT MUSEUMOF FLIGHT DRAWN BY OQR CHECKED BY OOR SCALE = 50' City of Tukwila Department of Community Development :6300 South'center Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone,(206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tpkplan@tukwila.wa.us Tb' -EAST MARGINAL WAY S. BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN NUMBER L11-019 r N22'31'52"W 428.38' N22'31'55"W 4105.70' COMMUNICATIONS DUCT BANK EASEMENT REC. NO. 9B06080935 5. —RESERVATIONS AND REVERSIONARY RIGHTS AS CONTAINED IN WARRANTY DEED REC. NO. 4764818 1) 1 SEE DETAIL A FOR PHASED IMPROVEMENTS UNDER D10-031 0 LOT 2 41,500 ±SQ.FT., 0.9527 ±ACRES -'LOT 1 BSIP: L10 -06Q'' • • • • THE PARKING ON LOT 1 SHOWS 173 STALLS AND THE PARKING IS FOR THE MUTUAL BENEFIT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, AND IS SUBJECT TO TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE, PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE PARKING VARIANCE L09-054. ACCESS, MAINTENANCE AND USE OF THESE PARKING AREAS ARE DETAILED IN THE GROUND LEASE .8ETWcEM'-THE--MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, A ` WASHINGTON NONPROFIT CORPORATION AS LANDLORD • AND THE HIGHLINE-&CHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401. A WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL• CORPORATION AS TENANT, A MEMORANDUM OF THE -GROUND LEASE IS TO BE •''RECORD€D FOLLOWII40 FINAL OF THE BSIP. a57 PAGE 060 LOT 2 BSIP L10-060 ACCSSRECE NO. 20100927002030 M ENT NT ND UTILITY AND AMENDED UNDER REC. N0. 20110202001697 40' 20' ORNAMENTAL TREE (TVP.) LANDSCAPING CURB AND GUTTER 200' SHORELINE • SETBACK FRONTAGE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PHASED TO INCLUDE PHASE 1, AS DEPICTED IN THIS DETAIL AND APPROVED UNDER CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NO. D10-031. FUTURE FRONTAGE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO OCCUR AT THE TIME THAT LOT 1 IS DEVELOPED. a 0 .0 BRH BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323-4144 S>. 320,9"• •• 60 0 30 60 1 inch = 60ft. GRAPHIC SCALE LOT 1 DETAIL A EASEMENT PLAN. BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN MUSEUM OF FLIGHT DRAWN BY OCR CHECKED BY OCR DATE SCALE APRIL 2011 1"= 60' JOB NUMBER 2001042-'I0 SHEET