Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL13-036 - RESIDENCE INN - DESIGN REVIEWRESIDENCE INN 16201 WEST VALLEY H WY PL13-036 L13-037 DESIGN REVIEW ADMINISTRATIVE Mary and Max — This is in regards to a non -conforming sign for Residence Inn -Marriott located at 16201 West Valley Hwy. ia-ooR3 I see that a code enforcement file had been opened (C14-0093). It looks like the case was closed last week. My understanding is it was closed because, per City Attorney, we can't force them to remove it. However, removing that sign was part of their design review process from file L13-037. I am assuming we approved design review based on good faith that they would follow through. This was Brandon's file and I am not sure if you want to talk with him about this or if we have to just leave the issue dead. But I wanted to pass this information along. Please let me know what ends up happening so I can make notes in my file. Thank you %/3 -Dace Return Address: CITY CLERK CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 1111 ID IH IIIII 1 IIllI 11111 [11 20140520000207 CITY OF TUKWIL C 75.00 PAGE -001 OF 004 05/20/2014 09:01 KING COUNTY, WA i RECEIVED JUN 0 6 201k COMMUNITY DEVEl 01'1\ II 1 I RDER'S Cover Sheet (RCW 65.04) Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): (all areas applicable to your document must be filled in) 1. VIOLATION NOTICE & ORDER 2. 3. 4. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference #'s on page of document Grantor(s) Exactly as name(s) appear on document 1. CITY OF TUKWILA 2. Additional names on page of document. Grantee(s) Exactly as name(s) appear on document 1. RELIANCE INVESTMENTS INC , 2. Additional names on page of document. • Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range) PARCEL A: LOT 2 OF SHORT PLAT NO 84 -31 -SS, AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO 85010030748, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY AUDITOR Additional legal is on page. ' of document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 1 Assessor Tax # not yet assigned 0005800006 The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. "I am signing below and paying an additional $50 recording fee (as provided in RCW 36.18.010 and referred to as an emergency nonstandard document), because this document does not meet margin and formatting requirements. Furthermore, I hereby understand that the recording process may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document as a result of this request" Signature of Requesting Party Note to submitter: Do not sign above nor pay additional $50 fee if the document meets margin/formatting requirements Mary— Sign at 16201 West Valley by Grand Prix Tukwila LLC, owner, never registered this non -conforming sign. Because it was never registered, it was required to either a) be removed or b) be brought into compliance. However, it is still up, and not in compliance. Enclosed is all the information. C -C r(e Ca(so, (1412 ConFi‘,y V 0K- ,2.0 7 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY 1. Article Addressed to: GRAND PRIX TUKWILA LLC 340 ROYA[ POINCIANA WAY 306 PALM BEACH FL 33480 ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee a of De erg D. Is delivery address different from item 1 0 Y s If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 2. Article Number (Transfer from service labeO 3. Service Type Certified Mall 0 Express Mal Registered etum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail .O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 7008 3230 0000 6623 0862 ❑ Yes PS Form 3811, February 2004 bomestic Retum Receipt 102595-02-M-154 UNITED. STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • ,`4 1, CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DVL 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD, STE 100 TUKWILA WA 98188 it Fi F 111111 iiii}ii If I lifts if f Fllf tf 7 FI3111 1711 111171�F1 i1 nJ O 3230 0000 6623 U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILm RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Postmark Here.t+ Total Postage! GRAND PRIX TUKWILA LLC Sent To 340 ROYAL POINCIANA WAY 306 PALM BEACH FL 33480 Q Street, Apt. No.; N or PO Box No. City, State, ZIP+S PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions August 15, 2012 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerfovi, Mtgor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director 0 , ( - 3 - GRAND PRIX TUKWILA LLC 340 ROYAL POINCIANA WAY 306 PALM BEACH, FL 33480 Re: Your sign at 16201 W VALLEY HWY Dear Property Owner, In August 2010, the City of Tukwila adopted a new Sign Code. This new code was developed through a lengthy process that included an advisory Committee with residents and businesses, public outreach and several public hearings. The result of this in-depth update process was the creation of a flexible sign code that permits many businesses and property owners to install more signs than were permitted under the previous sign code. Recently, City staff completed an inventory of all freestanding (pole) signs within the City. Through this inventory, the City has determined that the freestanding sign currently located on your property at 16201 W VALLEY HWY was made non -conforming by the adoption of the new sign code. A picture of the non -conforming sign is enclosed for your convenience. Given that it appears that the sign located on your property complied with the provisions of the previous sign code, a ten year grace period is provided to allow you to continue' to use the sign. During the ten year grace period you* may, with a permit, reface and complete copy changes to the sign. Please note that during the grace period the height and location of the sign cannot change. After the ten year grace period you can keep the sign indefinitely, but any proposed refaces or copy changes will require the sign to come into conformance with the City's sign regulations. In order to preserve the non -conforming status of the sign, you must obtain a free non -conforming sign permit within 180 days of this notice by completing and returning the enclosed permit application. As part of staff's review of your permit, we will attempt to determine if the sign was legally installed and whether all changes to the sign met the sign code in effect at the time. We may ask you for additional information to assist us. If you do not obtain the required permit within 180 days of this notice, the non -conforming sign must either be removed or immediately brought into compliance with the new Sign Code. City staff is available to meet with you to discuss how your property can benefit from the new sign code. If you would like to meet, or have questions about the permit process, please call Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684 or send an email to signpermits@tukwilawa.gov. Sy�cerely, on Morrison Winters Department of Community Development Enclosures (2 — picture of non -conforming sign, non -conforming sign permit)7r7b(-/ 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 Enclosure: Photograph of Sign Address: 16201 W VALLEY HWY v• Enclo"stire: Photograph of Sign Address: 16201 W VALLEY HWY City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director March 25, 2014 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Baker Construction Specialists, Inc. King County Department of Assessments Muckleshoot Indian Tribe This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L13-037, Administrative Design Review Applicant: Baker Construction Specialists, Inc. Type of Permit Applied for: Administrative Design Review Project Description: Completion of exterior upgrades to the 11 existing buildings located on the site. Work includes new siding and trim and replacing the railings on the existing balconies. The application will also be installing landscaping within the shoreline environment. Location: 16201 West Valley Hwy. Associated Files: None Comprehensive Plan Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Designation/Zoning District: II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The project is exempt from SEPA review. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the Administrative Design Review application does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, with no conditions. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 -days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by April 8, 2014. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period if no appeal is filed. JaPace, Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director SUMMARY OF DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW (ADR) File No.: L13-037 Project Name: Residence Inn Design Review Applicant: Barker Construction Specialties, Inc. Project Planner: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner Date: October 31, 2013 Decision: ❑ DENIED APPROVED ❑ APPROVED with the following conditions I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL None. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Location: 16201 West Valley Highway. Existing Site Conditions: The site is currently developed as an existing hotel and consists of 11 separate buildings on the site. There is also an outdoor pool, tennis court, and parking on the site. No changes are proposed to the site or building layout. Description of Proposal: The applicant has proposed to complete exterior renovations to the buildings located on the site. The exterior renovations consist of removing and replacing the existing siding and trim. The siding and trim will have the same soft cream colors as the existing siding. The application also proposes to replace the wooden guardrails on the balconies with aluminum. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.60.030 (2) (a) requires design review for the applicant's proposed project. Given that the applicant was only proposing to complete minor exterior modifications to the site, the City agreed to process a limited scope design review application. The City would only require that the landscaping on the site be upgraded. Zoning: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt from SEPA review. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN REVIEW REGULATIONS A. Relationship of Structure to Site i. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. ii. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. iii. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. ❑ Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. • Not Applicable Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. The site layout will not be modified as a result of this project. B. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Areas i. Harmony on texture, lines, and masses is encouraged ii. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided iii. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. iv. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. v. Compatibility of on-site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. ❑ Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. • Not Applicable Page 2 of 5 Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. The site layout will not be modified as a result of this project. C. Landscaping and Site Treatment i. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. ii. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. iii. Landscaping treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. iv. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigation steps should be taken. v. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. vi. Screening of service yards, and other places that tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. vii. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and paving of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. viii.Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. ® Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. ❑ Not Applicable Staff Notes: The site currently meets the City's landscaping requirements for perimeter landscaping; however, the site does not comply with the City's standards for parking landscaping. In lieu of adding parking lot landscaping, which would have likely required that parking be reduced, the City worked with the applicant to install landscaping along the Green River, located along the subject property. Pursuant to TMC 18.70.090, the Director may waive certain landscaping requirements when strict compliance would create substantial practical difficulties. Attachment A is a landscaping plan that shows a significant amount of native vegetation being installed within the shoreline environment of the Green River. Attachment A was prepared by a landscaped architect and was reviewed by the City's Urban Environmentalist and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. The plantings along the River will assist in providing additional shade and habitat for certain small mammals and birds. Page 3 of 5 D. Building Design i. Architectural style is not restricted; evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. ii. Buildings should be appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. iii. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with the anticipated life of the structure. iv. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used for accent. v. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. vi. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. vii. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. ® Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. ❑ Not Applicable Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. The proposed side is nearly identical to the existing siding. The colors are beige and are "harmonious" and bright colors are not being used. Replacing the wooden rails of the balconies is being done for safety as well as to upgrade the character of the building. The aluminum rails will provide a much more cleaner and fresh look than wood. E. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture i. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. ii. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to the site, landscape and buildings. ❑ Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. ® Not Applicable Page 4 of 5 Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. No miscellaneous structures or street furniture is proposed. All existing miscellaneous structures, such as the basketball court, pickle ball court, and outdoor dining areas will remain. V. Compliance with Other Citv Requirements The site currently contains a non -conforming freestanding sign that faces towards West Valley Highway. This site became non -conforming upon the adoption of the new Sign Code in August 2010. The property owner has failed to register the freestanding sign as part of the City's non -conforming registration process. Under TMC 19.36.040, a non -conforming sign loses its non -conforming status if the property owner does ofr obtain a non -conforming permit within 180 -days of being provided notice that the sign is non -conforming. The City provided a certified letter to the applicant on August 15, 2012, that the sign needed to be registered and the applicant did not submit the non -conforming sign permit application. VI. Conclusion The applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings. No new building footprints, parking or other site work is proposed as part of the project. The various sections of the code that discuss site layout and building design are not applicable to the applicant's proposed project. As discussed above, the project does not comply with the City's landscaping requirement for parking lot. In lieu of tearing up the existing parking lot and adding landscaping, the applicant has proposed to install landscaping within the shoreline environment of the Green River. The Director has the authority to allow this deviation, pursuant to TMC 18.70.090. This approach seems practical and logical in that it reduced costs to the applicant and provides for greater public benefit in that it provides vegetation along the shoreline. The existing freestanding sign is subject to removal because the applicant has not secured a non -conforming permit as required by TMC 19.360.040. Removal of the sign is a separate action and a Notice and Order will be issued by Code Enforcement. Page 5 of 5 TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE 3. Applications. Applications for a non -conforming sign permit shall contain the name and address of the sign user, the sign owner and the owner of the property upon which the sign is located, and such other pertinent information as the Director may require to ensure compliance with this chapter. The Director may waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. 4. Permit Issuance. Any person submitting an application for a non -conforming sign permit shall use the forms provided by the Department. The Director shall issue nonconforming sign permits upon a determination of eligibility. The Director may require the filing of plans or other pertinent information where such information is necessary to determine compliance with this chapter. Appeals shall be filed in accordance with Section 19.12.120. C. Loss of Legal Non -conforming Stains. Non -conforming signs shall either be removed or immediately brought into compliance with this chapter upon the occurrence of one or more of the following events: 1. When a non -conforming sign permit is required but not obtained within 180 days of notice of non-conformance. 2. When an application is submitted to the City for a project that is subject to design review, on any non -conforming building -mounted signs on the premise affected by the construction and all non -conforming free-standing signs lose their non- conforming status. 3. When any panel or copy changes are proposed after the expiration of the grace period. 4. When the sign meets the definition of abandoned. 5. Damage of 25 percent or more in the value of either the non -conforming sign or the structure to which it is affixed. D. IV1iintenance. Ordinary maintenance and repair of a sign shall be permitted without loss of nonconforming status if the cost of all maintenance and repair over a two-year period is less than 25 percent of the cost of replacing the sign. (0 rd. 2303 §10, 2010) 19.36050 Existing Freeway Interchange Signs Signs classified as freeway interchange signs under the previous Sign Code are permitted to remain for a five year grace period starting from the effective date of this ordinance. During the grace period, freeway interchange signs may have unlimited refaces and copy changes provided the area, height, and location of the sign remain unchanged. Relocation or re - erection of the sign during the grace period is not permitted. Application for a non -conforming sign permit is required for all sign face or copy changes to a freeway interchange sign. After the grace period has terminated, application for and issuance of a sign permit that complies with the Sign Code is required for any relocation, re -erection, alteration, replacement or change in any way to the structure or sign panel/face/copy. (0 rd 2303 §70, 2010) 1a3fi060 Non -Conforming Temporary Signs A. Non -conforming temporary signs must be removed within 30 days of the adoption of this code or the expiration of their sign permit, whichever comes first. B. Commercial real estate signs in existence in the City prior to the adoption of this code are permitted to remain for up to three months, after which time the signs must be removed and any future signage must comply with the terms of this code. (0 rd. 2303 §10, 2010) 1036070 Additional Signage Prohibited No additional permanent building -mounted signage is permitted on a tenant space that contains a non -conforming sign. No additional permanent freestanding signs are permitted on a premises that contains a non -conforming freestanding sign. (0 rd. 2303 §10, 2010) 19.36080 Financial Incentives - Tukwila International Boulevard Corridor In order to assist with the removal of non -conforming signs within the Tukwila International Boulevard Corridor, the City Council may develop a grant program to provide financial incentives to property owners and businesses. 1. Applications to the grant program shall be re- viewed quarterly and approved by the Director, subject to the availability of allocated funds. 2. In order to be eligible for grant funding the project must comply with the following requirements: a. Sites must be located within the Tukwila International Boulevard Redevelopment Area, Zoning Code Figure 18-9. b. Removal of non -conforming signs listed in Section 19.36.030 shall have a higher priority than removal of non -conforming signs listed in Section 19.36.020. c. Payment of the grant award shall not occur until after the sign has been removed and properly disposed of. d. No applicant or business shall receive more than $2,000 from the grant. e. The Director is hereby authorized to develop written procedures for award and administration of the grant funds. (0 rd. 2303 §10, 2010) Page 19-28 Produced by the City of Tukwila, City Clerk's Office eitriofJuF'u& Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Associated File Number (s): L13-037 Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Mailer's signature: Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _26 day of _March , _2014 Project Name: Residence Inn Project Number: PL13-036 Associated File Number (s): L13-037 Mailing requested by: Brandon iles Mailer's signature: / W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director March 25, 2014 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Baker Construction Specialists, Inc. King County Department of Assessments Muckleshoot Indian Tribe This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L13-037, Administrative Design Review Applicant: Baker Construction Specialists, Inc. Type of Permit Applied for: Administrative Design Review Project Description: Completion of exterior upgrades to the 11 existing buildings located on the site. Work includes new siding and trim and replacing the railings on the existing balconies. The application will also be installing landscaping within the shoreline environment. Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: 16201 West Valley Hwy. None Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The project is exempt from SEPA review. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the Administrative Design Review application does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, with no conditions. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director' s decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 -days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by April 8, 2014. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period if no appeal is filed. JaPace, Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director SUMMARY OF DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW (ADR) File No.: L13-037 Project Name: Residence Inn Design Review Applicant: Barker Construction Specialties, Inc. Project Planner: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner Date: October 31, 2013 Decision: ❑ DENIED APPROVED ❑ APPROVED with the following conditions I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL None. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Location: 16201 West Valley Highway. Existing Site Conditions: The site is currently developed as an existing hotel and consists of 11 separate buildings on the site. There is also an outdoor pool, tennis court, and parking on the site. No changes are proposed to the site or building layout. Description of Proposal: The applicant has proposed to complete exterior renovations to the buildings located on the site. The exterior renovations consist of removing and replacing the existing siding and trim. The siding and trim will have the same soft cream colors as the existing siding. The application also proposes to replace the wooden guardrails on the balconies with aluminum. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.60.030 (2) (a) requires design review for the applicant's proposed project. Given that the applicant was only proposing to complete minor exterior modifications to the site, the City agreed to process a limited scope design review application. The City would only require that the landscaping on the site be upgraded. Zoning: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt from SEPA review. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN REVIEW REGULATIONS A. Relationship of Structure to Site i. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. ii. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. iii. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. ❑ Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. • Not Applicable Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. The site layout will not be modified as a result of this project. B. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Areas i. Harmony on texture, lines, and masses is encouraged ii. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided iii. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. iv. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. v. Compatibility of on-site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. ❑ Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. • Not Applicable Page 2of5 Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. The site layout will not be modified as a result of this project. C. Landscaping and Site Treatment i. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. ii. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. iii. Landscaping treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. iv. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigation steps should be taken. v. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. vi. Screening of service yards, and other places that tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. vii. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and paving of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. viii.Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. ® Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. ❑ Not Applicable Staff Notes: The site currently meets the City's landscaping requirements for perimeter landscaping; however, the site does not comply with the City's standards for parking landscaping. In lieu of adding parking lot landscaping, which would have likely required that parking be reduced, the City worked with the applicant to install landscaping along the Green River, located along the subject property. Pursuant to TMC 18.70.090, the Director may waive certain landscaping requirements when strict compliance would create substantial practical difficulties. Attachment A is a landscaping plan that shows a significant amount of native vegetation being installed within the shoreline environment of the Green River. Attachment A was prepared by a landscaped architect and was reviewed by the City's Urban Environmentalist and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. The plantings along the River will assist in providing additional shade and habitat for certain small mammals and birds. Page 3 of 5 D. Building Design i. Architectural style is not restricted; evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. ii. Buildings should be appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. iii. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with the anticipated life of the structure. iv. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used for accent. v. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. vi. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. vii. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. ® Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. ❑ Not Applicable Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. The proposed side is nearly identical to the existing siding. The colors are beige and are "harmonious" and bright colors are not being used. Replacing the wooden rails of the balconies is being done for safety as well as to upgrade the character of the building. The aluminum rails will provide a much more cleaner and fresh look than wood. E. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture i. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. ii. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to the site, landscape and buildings. ❑ Project Complies. ❑ Project Does Not Comply. ❑ Project Complies is conditions are met. ® Not Applicable Page 4 of 5 Staff Notes: As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings on the site. No miscellaneous structures or street furniture is proposed. All existing miscellaneous structures, such as the basketball court, pickle ball court, and outdoor dining areas will remain. V. Compliance with Other City Requirements The site currently contains a non -conforming freestanding sign that faces towards West Valley Highway. This site became non -conforming upon the adoption of the new Sign Code in August 2010. The property owner has failed to register the freestanding sign as part of the City's non -conforming registration process. Under TMC 19.36.040, a non -conforming sign loses its non -conforming status if the property owner does obtain a non -conforming permit within 180 -days of being provided notice that the sign is non -conforming. The City provided a certified letter to the applicant on August 15, 2012, that the sign needed to be registered and the applicant did not submit the non -conforming sign permit application. VI. Conclusion The applicant is proposing to complete exterior renovations to several existing buildings. No new building footprints, parking or other site work is proposed as part of the project. The various sections of the code that discuss site layout and building design are not applicable to the applicant's proposed project. As discussed above, the project does not comply with the City's landscaping requirement for parking lot. In lieu of tearing up the existing parking lot and adding landscaping, the applicant has proposed to install landscaping within the shoreline environment of the Green River. The Director has the authority to allow this deviation, pursuant to TMC 18.70.090. This approach seems practical and logical in that it reduced costs to the applicant and provides for greater public benefit in that it provides vegetation along the shoreline. The existing freestanding sign is subject to removal because the applicant has not secured a non -conforming permit as required by TMC 19.360.040. Removal of the sign is a separate action and a Notice and Order will be issued by Code Enforcement. Page 5 of 5 at* of J uliwita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Number: PL13-036 x Notice of Application Notice of Decision L13-037 Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting 1 Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice /Q Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _22nd day of _July , _2013_ Project Name: Residence Inn Design Review Project Number: PL13-036 Associated File Number (s): L13-037 Mailing requested by: Bran 1 Mailer's signature: , / /Q W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIRUTXON.DOC AGENCY LABELS 2 ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service 0L/ Section 2 Office of Archaeology Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) Dept of Natural Resources Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. ******* NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT ( ) Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div )KC Dept of Parks & Recreation KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning TQC Dept of Natural Resources KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Foster Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ) Cultural Resources Fisheries Program \\( )`Wildlife Program Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ) Sound Transit/SEPA Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * Washington Environmental Council People for Puget Sound * ( j Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) — Notice to DOE must be by return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (printed out from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Notice of Application PROJECT INFORMATION Residence Inn has submitted an administrative design review application to complete facade changes to the existing buildings located at 16201 West Valley Hwy. Has part of the project, the applicant will install a significant amount of landscaping along the landward side of the ordinary high water mark of the Green River. No work will occur within 50 feet of the ordinary high water mark. The project is exempt from SEPA review. Projects applied for include: Administrative Design Review Other known required permits include: Building Permits Studies required with the applications include: None. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100; Tukwila, WA, 98188 or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M. on August 5, 2013. Comments may also be emailed to Brandon.Miles@Tukwilawa.gov. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Brandon Miles at (206) 431-3684, Brandon.Miles@tukwilawa.gov or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: July 12, 2013 Notice of Completeness Issued: July 12, 2013 Notice of Application Issued: July 22, 2013 po1Ope3rM,11.1%net Sem• •^womwl..x i not 0..1.311d 10911'°Be'N] s3wa Mp'Neuua� IsaM 009 stxaNy�M�plsaN ieN4eB jpd NUOIS !yseM'WW1 Ae.160-1 IleA IseM 10294 fouiew i q uui oouepise 5 a Z N N z Z u�ga City of Tukwila of Community Department p Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: —I \.k o , \3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-149 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 [l Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Gateway Building Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: \A N tJ \ til •-\ 5a A-A•N\I Sheet Number(s): . - LA0 -0/ "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: -1\ 0 l3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-148 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 D _ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 18 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: �\AL \N -Ah A\iE X33 ),1 Sheet Number(s): \. A — ' - 2 \Act L- -Vrl—a NA -Ac -re- . "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: —1 I V �"� Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-147 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 17 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: A90,(7- -v-3\ v -i k .k-DL-‘, \ 1A -N t)c S - Sheet Number(s): 4-11,A - pNAL\ LyAt Tv- r "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Itevision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: 1 V-2- 0 3❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-146 ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 16 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: pykQ' r �- ti . Sheet Number(s): k\ -\.k -- i••••\ -c) M bac . "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: `l k.3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-145 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 15 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: CD\ Pt k-SAJ,\ W 1 Sheet Number(s): � At- -- 0 k \A L\ MIN'p C . "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: —•1 1.O Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-144 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 14 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: P\A \--11-1k tAcA ve • •�C-"Zr Wti L Sheet Number(s): 1-A `A- — Gt.AA-1J,Mit€ . "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: I,3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-143 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 13 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: PA 1.1. ►J, i t.� , N -m Go O. Sheet Number(s): \ - p\Pr�.-� LL �, ��� \*'O : . "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila O? Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite # 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: —1t1.0 L V3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13 -142 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 12 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: \,a \ r -ry T Loi, T om\ PNN.�C� P 5 � Tit iZc—z �1�1y v�1' ‘71--\ \---1P4-1 Sheet Number(s): A -- 1-X.0 C7\AL\ irnAn, "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: `l 0 `'3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13 -141 0 Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 11 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy ION Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: 0"\--- "kzTYY-N 17ow\7A +2-1 a - Sheet Number(s): L\ `A. -- tp\� CUMA M CSE "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: n Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: -f tOlt3 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-140 Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 10 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: 1:1A1.1 k 1 1.14 Oepykv2.- l'Yl ►- lam► 1 C- �5 i--1��ir� (���= � Prtj SS Eta 1->'‘ i l� I W ► T p kok-LJ r..) i 1J D SheetNumber(s): L\\ - ‘-.)VA-LA NIA "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: -'j l O l i3 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Plan Check/Permit Number: D13 139 Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 9 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: Sheet Number(s): \--A.Pt1J, MASE "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: 1k. 1" l i 3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-138 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 8 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: P\Pc1-1L\ t-\ ADEc---T. i Peo i \-J1\ !W Sheet Number(s): L \A - cA Gt r- tE� "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov VISIO -IT- Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: �� �'� Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-137 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 7 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: \� 5 �.0 c�►� v\t\p\,4 -X \ Sheet Number(s): >�J� — r- V 'per YV --t) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: -11101 l3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-136 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 6 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: Sheet Number(s): - ka.0 P L L¼-- - t "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila OZ Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite # 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: `1, �3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-135 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 5 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: Pvt\t,.‘,1 k-Vtgc "\7\--\ v)IPM-1,iJ\ tJ kl 23e= 7Y11_l,T. Sheet Number(s): \A- — }�o VAALL, l am "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: ` . \ o `\3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-134 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 O Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 4 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: P\At.1.4L .\ ,c>e p�r���'1J T ��-1C�� S t-XPrE C 1—� Pew S � "� R-Z�1y h1 t T., pw -\. 1 �� t`1et Sheet Number(s): V. -1\N — !-10 •p1tett`1,\ ‘.,\ h C_LSAV-1.e\e- MAID "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: --1 C) \3 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-133 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 3 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: P\ \-" \ � k ''C) - 0--X- 1 r' Lo tJC fit`\ S Nk'e 12.1_Tly ‘''4‘ TJ\Av1J\J \ tAaq WJE A1i<'-C`cV13%,N.-V . Sheet Number(s): \J P — *Mbhp� "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: —1 \C:). I Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-132 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 2 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: P `Act•!. 1,1 \ CSL LW\.t C 1`1 Ppb-tDiz i 14-Q.�-1y \-4 p1A 1J,t-\'t �E-t2�' tv1 rCl��T Sheet Number(s): V\PA—N W\—CI ‘%\t-‘ t•J MY "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: —I 1,10 ` 13 Plan Check/Permit Number: D13-150 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # • Response to Correction Letter # 1 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Marriott Residence Inn, Bldg 1 Project Address: 16201 West Valley Hy Contact Person: Ryan Nestor Phone Number: 847 763-1692 Summary of Revision: Pk Ac1.1 K1 N 1-DEp4r_ WAND. -r Go4-k c_avz_Lls1'-1E w\ -n-4 ?km,kv-1'11.1es Sheet Number(s): 1J A —1--1O 'P\ A v Gl.\�1-k� l� tempt p� "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on C:\Users\jennifer-m\Desktop\Revision Submittal Form.doc Revised: May 2011 May 14, 2013 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Ryan Nestor Barker Construction 600 W Cermak Rd, Ste 2A Chicago, IL 60616 RE: Correction Letter #1 Development Permit Application Numbers D13-132 thru 150 Marriott Residence Inn Bldgs —16201 West Valley Hy Dear Mr. Nestor, This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Planning Department. At this time the Building, Fire, and Public Works Departments have no comments. Planning. Department: Brandon Miles at 206 431-3684 if you have questions regarding the attached comments. Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) sets of revised plans, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections/revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (206) 431-3670. Sincerely, Jennifer Marshall Permit Technician File No. D13-132 thru D13-150 W:IPermit CenterlCorrection Letters120131D13-152 Correction Letter #1.docx 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule online. 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 7. If the project requires SEPA review: Payment of a $365 notice board fee to Fast Signs Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). Mailed notice is not required. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 8. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). 9. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. 10. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application) 11. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.doc March 24, 2011 STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at t‘92-01 h1 E sT V PM iv , SEE.AITv1 . W A for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at L. %-k1 CR eiO (city), ♦k•—• (state), on JV `y t `k' , 20 �3 (Print Name) LL1 X w , Rb. S12A LLA i01 (Address) (Phone Number) �2rilmr1 On this day personally appeared before me 1 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed t el ame as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS it- DAY OF Official Seal Allen D Yanong Notary Public State of Illinois My Commission Expires 09/08/2014 J ul7 ,2013 NO ARY PUBLIC ' d for th:f• ''e of Washington ILt-tt t2ls residing at My Commission expires on 04/ 7 / 1 OP Lev H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.doc May 23, 2011 Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning SITE PLAN: 12 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. (c) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. (f) Loading and service areas. (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors and materials. (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50%). (k) Show all existing and proposed easements. (1) Vicinity Map with site location does not have to be to scale. LANDSCAPE PLAN: 13 (a) If the landscaping will be altered or the existing landscaping does not meet current standards (TMC 18.52) provide a landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN (If the project will affect any sensitive areas): 14 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20%, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. (d) Existing and proposed building footprints. H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\Dcsign Revicw-Administrativc-Jan2011.doc March 24, 2011 Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning _ CIVIL PLANS (If utility or site work is proposed): 15 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. (d) Total expected cut and fill. (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to 1.)://www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwpermit.html. (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: 16. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. Maximum size 24" x 36". 17. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. 18. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is suggested. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). 19. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting if any changes to the existing fixtures are proposed. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Administrative-Ian20I I.doc March 24, 2011 CITY OF TUKWILA 12 2013 Department of Community Developmeet,UN ow 14ESIGN REVIEW - vE 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9808 ADMINISTRATIVE Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planningna,TukwilaWA.gov APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -DR Planner: File Number: I ,j _ ,7 7 Application Complete Date: Project File Number:'' Pl a -d3 Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Res a Et`1CC 1 �1 L . t SEA -171E. SovT1A — TV \LW .t lie LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 1 2.01 wE�T• 4 stM\�� any SEA -Tr ie., w A ove>lab LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: FdctaiC-s32 Go1—xs-rx2A3 allc U sj-AE4 PCLTIFS tl,L.• Address: .DVZ) ‘Sv« Ll 1tLPtt1O1 1L Phone: t E-mail: sE�C_ FAX: ��-%ll —11D3 Alen tyl Signature: / Date: Jul iy 1 \ t "2-c)1,3 H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.doc March 24, 2011 ti0- ' v END OF 6' H FENCE ASPHALT PATH 41.4 • /3 `1 /F '-0 ,1 L ASPHALT PATH c co _ ocn ,!5 A • 'RGL: PLANT LEGEND • fE rarcv-4 '3, ,1 ; A. n;r'•6ic• wa yede kG yle /6 LAWN WIDTH VARIES BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOT, TYP. LARGE DECIDUOUS TREE SMALL DECIDUOUS TREE LARGE CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN TREE COLUMNAR EVERGREEN TREE SHRUB SHRUB MASS GRASS LAWN COTTONWOOD TREE GROVE 6' H SOLID FENCE LAWN i SIDEWALK BLACKBERRY ALONG RIVERBANK, TYP. SHED JUNIPER HEDGE, 4'S' H cc - 7.0 a. 'RAVEL MULCH LOW ORNAMENTAL GRASSES - AD._.tENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING DECIDUOUS SHRUB HEDGE, 4' H EVERGREEN SHRUBS, 3' H mow~ e. ti NOTES: 1. BASE INFORMATION SHOWN, EXCEPT FOR EXISTING VEGETATION, IS FROM AS -BUILT SURVEY PROVIDED BY BARKER NESTOR ARCHITECTS DATED 01.16-1987 AND PREPARED BY TRI COUNTY LAND SURVEYING CO., KIRKLAND, WA. 2. EXISTING VEGETATION SHOWN IS BASED ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS BY THE LA STUDIO, LLC, RECORDED 06-04-2013. LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF VEGETATION ARE APPROXIMATE; PLANT SPECIES CALLOUTS ARE PARTIAL. VEGETATION SHOWN IS LIMITED TO AREAS ALONG STREET FRONTAGES, PARKING LOT INTERIOR. AND ALONG ASPHALT PATH ON WEST EDGE OF SITE. 3. VEGETATION AROUND PERIMETERS OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN BUT GENERALLY CONSISTS OF SMALL DECIDUOUS TREES, SMALL COLUMNAR EVERGREEN TREES, LOW TO MEDIUM HEIGHT DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS, GROUNDCOVER, AND GRASS LAWN. r f• S..�Sr kr SAS f IVY GROUNDCOVER e lQ A5 o,. r `t LAWN WIDTH VARIES BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOT, TYP. v- µ,.. 5 J O'' WS c\p. \ o 9 _ (.'7, \-s.' ° \.‘---'''° T"('' OW SHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL �� ° 0,.1J `, GRASSES & PERENNIALS ' `,�- L ^O..J \\C�\\ . ' 37- Ze wfs7' VAL`LY l �3 •_ HIGHWAY -V4 nsGATE J — 04; ,rrq 4' H SOLID FENCE c �! LARGE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER EVERGREEN SHRUB HEDGE, 1 4'H X4'W(APPROX:"- /L/7 C1Nj I!Sh 0r-- COTTONWOOD / ALDER TREE GROVE 6' H SOLID FENCE 15' 20' H EVERGREEN SHRUB HEDGE ORNAMENTAL GRASSES WI GRAVEL MULCH EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN 15 30 60 90 • -J^ Wee R. Easaer. RU, ASLA g E STA E OF w1SX NOTON REG! TERED �ARCXR� Issue Dates Rev.i Dale i Desc. 06-07-13 POW SUBWIT.4. c o c ¢ PROJECT It: LA -1310 FILE NAME: LA1310-L1 DRAWN BY: CP/MB EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1. TREE STAKES TO BE 58911CAL PARALLEL EVEN -TOPPED. UNSCARRED AND DRIVEN INTO UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE PLACE FOR LOCAL WIND CONDITIONS. 2. PLANT TREE 50 TOP OF ROOT BALL G AT SOIL LEVEL —'ARBOR TE' OR APPROVED EQUAL TREE TIES 8-0001 x 2' OIAMEI19 WOOD TREE STAKES. 2 PER TREE. JASPER OR EQUAL REMOVE TWINE AND CORD FROM TREE TRUNK 3� DEPTH MEDIUM BARK MULCH -4- WATERING BASIN SURROUNDING TREE rxsnwn— la EXISTING -"-J SUBGRADE PULL 8UR1AP OFF LOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL 8ACKF100 WITH NATIVE AMENDED SOIL SCARIFY PLANTING PIT WALLS - SLOPE WALLS 01:3 SET ROOTBALL ON MOUA'O OF 3 TIMES ROOT UNDISTURBED BASE BALL DIAMETER L,f DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING �� SCALE: 12'=1,0 - NOTE PLANT SHRUB SO TOP OF ROOT BLL IS AT SOIL LEVEL. 3- DEPTH MEDIUM BARK MULCH 4- WATERING BASIN SURROUNDING PLANT FINISH GRADE REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. UGHTLY SCARIFY 90018011 OF CONTAINER -GROWN PLANTS. PRIOR TO BACICFIWNG BACKFILL 491111 NATIVE AMENDED SOIL SCARIFY PLANTING PR WALLS EXISTING SUBGRADE SET ROOTBALL ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED SOIL SHRUB PLANTING SCALE: 12" = 1'd GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH 005 KID GF WORK AND UNDER TIE SUPERVISION OF A QUAIFlED FOREMAN. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SIZES AND DUALITY 10 CONFORM TO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOIC CURRENT EDITION. 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF NURSERY STOCK AND SHALL BE OF THE TYPE. SIZE AND CONDITION SPECIFIED. THE PUNT MATERIAL SHALL EXIST NORMAL HABITS OF GROWTH FOR 111E SPECIES. SHALL HALE BUDS INTACT AND SHALL BE FREE OF DISEASE. INSECTS. SCARS. BRUISES, BREAKS. SEED AND WED ROOTS. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL 91E UTIINIES PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION. PUNT LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLCT. 5. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING 910 DIPROVDLDNTS, PAWING. WALLS. AND UNDERGROUND MUTES DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED TO DEE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. 6. PUNT COUNT IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE IF THERE IS A 04SCREP011C1. THE PLAN SHALL COVERN. 7. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT SPECIES, VARIETIES. OR SM WE TO LACK OF AVALABIITY SUB.0CT TO WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 8 SQIL.ffiFE DUSTING GRASS SOD IN PROPOSED PLANTING BED AREAS SHALL BE LOWED DOWN TO 4494. WIGHT AND 111±00 INTO GROUND. PLANTING BEDS 91ALL BE AMENDED *1111 3 INCHES OF YARD WASTE COMPOST (CEDAR GROVE 0R APPROVED EQUAL) TILED IN TO 10-1801 DEPM. 9. FINISH GRADE OF MU.O ED LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST BE GRADED 10 1/2" MAK BELOW ADJACENT CONCRETE OR OTHER PAVED SURFACES 1o. PAT PIT 1A KP1I I • PUNT PITS SHALL BE B.ACKFTUED WITH NATIVE AMENDED BALL DIAMETER NOTES. 1. USE THREE 'ARBOR TIC OR APPROVED EOLAL TREE LIES EVENLY SPACED AROUND BASE OF TREE -PLACE FOR LOCAL WIND CONDITIONS. 2. PLANT TREE SO TOP OF ROOT BALL GAT set LEVE. 'ARBOR 110 OR APPROVED EQUAL TREE TES 3- DEPTH MEDIUM BARK MULCH BACKFILL WITH NATIVE AMENDED SOIL 4- WATERING BASIN SURROUNDING TREE 2X2 HARDWOOD STAKE ERNE INTO UNDISTURBED 5080900E FINISH GRADE REMOVE TWINE AND CORD AROUND TRUNK OF TREE PULL BURLAP OFF TOP 1/3 OF 900180LL SCARIFY PLANTING PIT WALLS - 5LOPE WALLS 01:3 EXGTINO SUBGRADE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING SCALE: 12' - 1'-0• CROUNDCOVER PLANT. SEE PLANT UST S DEPTH BARK MULCH AMENDED NATIVE SOIL EXISTING SUBGRADE GROUNDCOVER PLANT SPACING AS INDICATED ON PLANT LIST (TYPICAL) EDGE OF RANIFR GROUNDCOVER PLANTING SCALE.150 1•-0' 11. MIK MATO. ALL PANTING BEDS SMALL BE DRESSED WITH 3- DEPTH MEDIUM BARK MULCH. ALL PLANING BED AREAS LEFT UNPLANNED SHALL ALSO BE DRESSED W1TH 3" DEPTH AMIN BARK MULCH. 8A1K WW1 SHALL WSDOT SPEC, 9-14.4(3). 12. MUM& CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IRRIGATION FOR ALL NEW PLANTING MEM FOR ONE YEAR MIN., INCLUDING ONE FULL GROWING SEASON FOLLOWING INSTALLATION AND WINTERIZATION AT END OF 0ROW4EG SEASON. CONTRACTOR MAY IRRIGATE BY TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SYSTEM. HAND WATERING. OR PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATOR SYSTEM. FOR PER1WIE T AUTOMATIC SYSTEM CONTRACTOR SNAIL COORDINATE WITH OWNER TO DETERMINE AVALABMY AND SUITABILITY OF EXISTING ORRICAT1ON SYSTEM FOR EXPANSION TO COVER NEW PLANTING AREAS AND ROME SIVA DRAWING FOR OWNER APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARIAN IRRIGATION SISTER N GOOD WORKING ORDER DURING REQUIRED WATERING PERIID. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OWNER WITH ONE SET OF CLEM, LEGIBLE. TO -SCALE AS -BUILT D RAWINGS 111111 ALL Ca4PONFNTS ACCURATELY LOCATED AT COMPLETION OF SYSTEM NTALAT1ON. 13. DUAR NIEE Z. REPLACEMENT. ALL PANT MATERIALS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR PARTS SHALL 8E INSPECTED AT LEAST MONTHLY. AND AL DEAD. DISE/SED, POORLY SHAPED. OR DAMAGED PLANTS SINAL BE REPLACED N MEDIATEIY. F PLANTS ARE STOLEN OR 0411ACFD BY 111E ACTS OF OMFR5, OWNER WILL PAY RADICE COST ONLY FOR ITE REPLACEMENT PLANTS WITH NO MARK-UP. AND THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RES' POHSBLE FOR THE LABOR TO INSTAL THE RFPLCOENT HANTS. 14. 101111216K1:. CONTRACTOR SHALL MANTA* AU- NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS DURING GUARANTEE PERIOD. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE BY A UCD6ED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE MANTEAN5E COMPANY. L1AMENANCE SAIL *CUM WEED AND PEST CONTROL WATERING, FERTILIZATION, PRUNING, ANO REAOVAL/REPIA EMFM OF DEAD OR DAMAGED PDMS. PLANT SCHEDULE SYM. QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE REMARKS TREES0 . F C PLAN\'::!,. • APPR7`:7,^Y - ICER MACROPHYLWM BIGLEAF MAPLE 1-1/2" No changes can be made to those 0 4 PSEUDOTSUGA mENZE511 DOUGLAS RR HT.plans without approval from tho I Planning Divisi n of OCD + 4 PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIE511 0000105 FIR 6' HT. ".proved By: 9" 3 "2zipy SHRUBS 11 AMELANCH1ER ALNIFOLLA Q 150 GAULTHERIA 5HALL0N O12 HOLODISCUS DGCOLOR • 11 RAMONA AOUIFOLIULI 34 PHILA0EIPHUS LE9GII 'BUZZARD' 98 POLY5DCHUM 'AUSTRIA O6 SAMBUCUS RACF1105A • 31 SYMPHORIARP05 ALBA 22 VACCI410* MATUM GROUNDCOVER 90 FRACARIA CHILOENSG SERVICEBERRY SAIL OCEANSPRAY TALL OREGON GRAPE BUZZARD MOCK ORANGE SWORD FERN RED ELDERBERRY SNOWBERRY EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY BEACH STRAWBERRY 5 GAL. 8' 0.C. SPACING 2 GAL. 30" 0.C. SPACING 5 GA. 8' 0.C. SPACING 2 GAL 4' O.C. SPACING 2 GAL 4' 0.C. SPACING 1 GAL. 30" O.C. SPACING 5 GAL 8' 0.C. SPACING 2 GAL. 4' O.C. SPACING 2 GAL 4' 0.C. SPACING 4- POT 12' 0.C. SPACING ON PARKING LOT BLAND) o4 AT EOF wASNwaroN REW9TERE0 AR MELVIN R. PSTER 1ErtriMCATEOSS Issue Dates Rev., Dam Desc. 07-10-13 1591ED FOR 81D & 00451 UC1KN 0 2 >0 Jo 4/AL' L m a� U x o C c v3 U) Ids H� z 0 Fg5 C z 0 5 5 0 g � m o Q € o w o d m A 6 403 R g� i`orn 9400t 25 PROJECT #:LA -1310 FILE NAME: LA1310-L2 DRAWN BY: CP LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES & LEGEND L2 ISSUED FOR BID EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. TYP. EXISTING ASPHALT PATH UGHT POLE. TYP.. PROTECT IN PLACE COSTING LAWN TO REMAIN NOTES: 1. BASE INFORMATION SHOWN, EXCEPT FOR EXISTING VEGETATION, IS FROM AS -BUILT SURVEY PROVIDED BY BARKER NESTOR ARCHITECTS DATED 01-16-1987 AND PREPARED BY TRI COUNTY LAND SURVEYING CO, KIRKLAND, WA. 2. EXISTING VEGETATION SHOWN IS BASED ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS BY THE LA STUDIO, LLC, RECORDED 06-04-2013. LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF VEGETATION ARE APPROXIMATE; PLANT SPECIES CALLOUTS ARE PARTIAL. VEGETATION SHOWN IS LIMITED TO AREAS ALONG STREET FRONTAGES, PARKING LOT INTERIOR, AND ALONG ASPHALT PATH ON WEST EDGE OF SITE. 3. VEGETATION AROUND PERIMETERS OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN BUT GENERALLY CONSISTS OF SMALL DECIDUOUS TREES, SMALL COLUMNAR EVERGREEN TREES, LOW TO MEDIUM HEIGHT DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS, GROUNDCOVER, AND GRASS LAWN. 4. SEE SHEET L2 FOR PLANTING DETAILS, NOTES, AND LEGEND. r COTTONWOOD TREE GROVE 3' DEPTH BARK MULCH ONLY AT UNPLANTED AREA MOUND TREE EXISTING UGHT POLE, PROTECT IN PLACE, BP. END OF 6' HIGH FENCE EXISTING ASPHALT PATH-- \\\,. - EXISTING CONCRETE PATH \; \ EXISTING mull, CABINET, MAINTAIN REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK li` ALUMINUM ING, 3/16"X4', P6666= PRbSLIDE OR APPROVED EQUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN — CENTRAL o 10 20 40 60 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISONG LAWN TO REMAIN EXISTING UTRUIY CABINET. MAINTAIN REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK, COSTING LAWN TO REMAIN R EXISTING CONCRETE PATH EXISTING LAWN TO MANN ALUMINUM EDGING. 3/161X4', PERMALOC PROSUDE OR APPROVED EQUAL, TYP. LANDSCAPE PLAN — SOUTH 10 20 40 60 1 = 20•-0• AT EXISTING PARKING LOT BLAND, _STRIP AND REMOVE NY TO SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO ENSURE ENTIRE ROOT REMOVAL PRIOR TO SOIL PREP AND PLANONG DOSING LAWN TO REMAIN PLANT`;:.." APP'. d. _ -_.• No changes can be mad^ tr t se plans without annroval from tho I Planning flf ir'an of DCO ^,^rovca Ry:4 • EXISTING UTIUTY CABINET, MAINTAIN REWIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK EXISTING LAWN TO REMAIN EXISTING CONCRETE PATH ,`----------- 6ISONG ASPHALT PATH ALUMINUM EDGING, 3/16-(4', PERMALOC PROSUDE OR APPROVED EQUAL. TYP. EXISTING LAWN TO REMAIN // EXISTING U 1UIY CABINET. MAINTAIN REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK WEST VALLEY 14 . LANDSCAPE PLAN — NORTH 10 20 40 60 1" = STATECW WASMNGTONREGMERED MELVIN R. EASTER CERT.-CATE Rama Issue Dates Rev. Date Dose. , 07-10-13 ISSUED FOR BE & CONSTRUCTION 1 PROJECT 4: LA -1310 FILE NAME: LA1310-L1 DRAWN BY: CP LANDSCAPE PLAN 02- L1 >47 ISSUED FOR BID