The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit PL13-041 - BAKER COMMODITIES - TANK REPLACEMENT SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTBAKER COMMODITIES 5795 S 130 PL PL13-041 E13-016 City o.. Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E13-016 Applied: 09/09/2013 Issue Date: 10/23/2013 Status: ISSUED Applicant: BAKER COMMODITIES Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: REPLACE ONE 20,000 GALLON TANK AND INSTALL ONE NEW 20,000 GALLONG TANK TO HOLD WASTE WATER UNTIL IT IS DISCHARGED TO THE CITY'S SEWER SYSTEM. THE ADDITION OF THE NEW TANK DOES NOT EXPAND THE NONCONFORMING USE ON THE SITE, Location of Proposal: Address: 5795 S 130 PL TUKW Parcel Number: 0001400005 Section/Township/Range: NW & NE 14-23-04 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 1(— 1-3 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. ack Pace, Responsible Offici City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 )O -a3- �3 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) rtnr.: DNS -4/07 F13-016 Printer: 1(1-99-9(113 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director DATE: October 23, 2013 TO: FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner MEMORANDUM Jack Pace, Director, Dept. of Community Development RE: Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist E13-006: Baker Commodities Tank Replacement and Addition I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposal is to replace and relocate one 20,000 gallon storage tank and to install one new storage tank of 20,000 gallons to increase the amount of storage time for waste water on the site. The additional retention time for the waste water will allow better quality water treatment. The property is the site of a rendering facility which is located on a parcel surrounded on three sides by the Duwamish River. The tank replacement/addition is located outside of the shoreline jurisdiction. Baker Commodities Site CL Page 1 of 6 H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. 10/22/2013 9:10 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 4 Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 or aste Water Tanks II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant: Location: Agencies with Jurisdiction: Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: Notification: o+i +54ft Baker Commodities Tank Replacement Mike Bulleri, General Manager, Baker Commodities The site is located at 5795 South 130th Place, Tukwila, WA 98178. The tax parcel number is 000140-0005. City of Tukwila, Washington State Department of Ecology Light Industrial (LI) Notice of Application was mailed to tenants and property owners within 500 feet of the project and posted on a public notice board located at the street end of 56th Avenue South in Foster Point (for better visibility to adjacent residents) on October 8, 2013. Other Required Permits: D13-290, building permit for tank installation The following information was considered as part of review of this application: CL Page 2 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM H:\\Baker Commodities El 3-006 \Staff Rpt. Baku Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 1. SEPA Checklist dated August 27, 2013 2. ESA Screening Checklist dated August 27, 2013 3. Structural Drawings prepared by DHP Engineering dated 9-3-13 4. Applicant TMC 18.66.120 Compatibility Analysis 5. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan, prepared by Seeler Engineering, P.C., September, 2011 NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Carol Lumb, Senior Planner, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188; telephone 206- 431-3661. III. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. Background The proposal is to replace one 20,000 gallon storage tank and add one new tank of the same size to increase the amount of storage time for waste water on the site prior to discharge to the public sewer system. The tank to be replaced is located elsewhere on the property. The waste water tanks will be located together in the location identified in the photo above. The additional retention time for the waste water will allow better quality water treatment. The property is the site of an animal rendering facility which is located on a parcel surrounded on three sides by the Duwamish River. The tank replacement/addition is located outside of the shoreline jurisdiction. The rendering facility is an unclassified use in the zoning district in which it is located. This will be discussed further under the Land Use section of the checklist. 1-6. Concur with checklist. 7. Spill Prevention control and Countermeasure Plan has been prepared for the site. 8-11. Concur with checklist. 12. Portions of the parcel on which the proposed project is located lie within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction, which is considered an environmentally sensitive area. The tanks in question will be located outside the shoreline jurisdiction. CL H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. Page 3 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 B. Environmental Elements Earth: a -h. Concur with checklist. Air: a -c. Concur with checklist. The tanks are vented to air scrubbers. Best management practices will be implemented during construction activities to reduce and control dust and air emissions. Water: a -d. Concur with checklist. The site is required to have a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan to contain any spills from the water storage tanks as well as the other storage tanks on the site. A copy of this plan was submitted as part of the SEPA application. The subject parcel is surrounded on three sides by the Duwamish River, a shoreline of the state however, the subject tanks will be located outside the shoreline jurisdiction. Plants: a -d. Concur with checklist. Animals: a -d. Concur with checklist. The site is located along the Pacific Flyway, a route for migratory birds. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c. Concur with checklist. Environmental Health: a. The Spill Containment Plan addresses the possibility of a spill from the subject tanks, which store waste water. The tanks are located in an area that is fully paved and diked for containment. The site is sloped to collection sumps which collect fluids and pumps them to treatment. The Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan states that "...Catastrophic failure of the secondary containment system could result in a release to the Duwamish River which bounds the site on three sides." b. Concur with checklist. Land and Shoreline Use: a -d. Concur with checklist. CL H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. Page 4 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM d Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 e and f. The Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation on the site is Light Industrial (LI). The rendering plant is an unclassified use in the LI district. As part of the SEPA application, the applicant provided responses to a series of criteria found in TMC 18.66.120, which apply to the rending plant. These criteria are to be used to determine whether the unclassified use is being expanded through a particular action being proposed for the site. The City concurs with the applicant's responses to these criteria that the replacement of one tank and the addition of a second is not an expansion of the current unclassified use as it does not increase the manufacturing capacity of the facility. h. Much of the Baker Commodities parcel lies within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction, which is considered an environmentally sensitive area governed by TMC 18.44. The proposed waste water tanks lie outside the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction. i-1. Concur with checklist. Housing: a -c. Concur with checklist. Aesthetics: a -c. Concur with checklist. Light and Glare: a -d. Concur with checklist Recreation: a -c. Concur with checklist Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c. Concur with checklist Transportation: a -g. Concur with checklist. Public Services: a -b. Concur with checklist. CL H:\\Baker Commodities El 3-006\Staff Rpt. Page 5 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 Utilities: a -b. Concur with checklist. Comments: No comments were received during the Notice of Application period. RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -significance CL Page 6 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. eitti of J u;F,'wiea Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Carol Lumb HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Name: Baker Commodities Project Number: E13-016 Notice of Public Hearing X Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet X Notice of Decision Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ — FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 23 day of October in the year 2013. Staff report, DNS, Notice of Decision, Spill Control Plan and response to TMC 18.66.120 e-mailed to Ecology 10/22/13 after close of comment period. Project Name: Baker Commodities Project Number: E13-016 Mailing requested by: Carol Lumb Mailer's signature: a H:\Baker Commodities E13-016\Affidavit of Distribution-10-23-13.doc October 23, 2013 TO: City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION Michael Bulleri, Baker Commodities King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: DETERMINATION: ZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: E13-016 Michael Bulleri, Baker Commodities Replace one 20,000 gallon tank and add one new 20,000 gallon tank to store waste water from the rendering facility. The addition of the new tank will allow the waste water to be held longer on site for treatment prior to discharge to the City's sewer system and is not considered an expansion of the nonconforming use on site. 5795 South 130th Place, Tukwila Determination of Nonsignificance Light Industrial Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA, Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at 206-431-3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes not withstanding any program of revaluation. The decision is appealable to King County Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). -1/1/ fallack Pace, Director Department of Community Development SEPA Responsible Official CL Page 1 of 1 10/21/2013 2:42 PM H:\Baker Commodities-E13-016\Notice of Decision CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION Baker Commodities submitted an application to the City of Tukwila for a State Environment Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental review to replace one 20,000 gallon waste water storage tank and to add a new 20,000 gallon tank both to be located in an existing concrete containment area. Projects applied for include: E13-016: SEPA Environmental Review; D13-290: Building Permit for tanks. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. The application is available for review at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd Suite #100, Tukwila WA 98188. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You are invited to comment on this project. Your written comments must be delivered to the address listed above or postmarked no later than 5:00 pm on October 22, 2013. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. For further information on this proposal, please contact Carol Lumb at (206) 431-3661, or via email at: Carol.Lumb@tukwilawa.gov or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: September 10, 2013 Notice of Completeness Issued: September 23, 2013 Notice of Application Issued: October 8, 2013 C1/CL Page 1 Of 1 10/07/2013 10:26 AM W: User\Courtney\NOA-E13-016 et* of Sanaa Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Associated File Number (s): E13-016 x Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _7th day of _October , 2013_ Project Name: Baker Commodities Inc Project Number: PL13-041 Associated File Number (s): E13-016 Mailing requested by: Stacy Mac gor/Courtney Johnson Mailer's signature: 7- Z ,(� / , \ W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of Application SEPA Environmental Review, Baker Commodities Location : 5795 S. 130th PL Tukwila WA 98178 File # E13-016 Applicant: Baker Commodities INC. Property Owner: Michael Bulleri Project Planner: Stacy.MacGregor@Tukwilawa.gov Project Description: The City of Tukwila has received an application from Baker Commodities Inc. for a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Review to replace one waste water storage tank and to add a new tank. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 or via email to Stacy.MacGregor@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on October 22, 2013.You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. City of Tukwila Notice of Application SEPA Environmental Review, Baker Commodities Location : 5795 S. 130th PL Tukwila WA 98178 File # E13-016 Applicant: Baker Commodities INC. Property Owner: Michael Bulleri Project Planner: Stacy.MacGregor@Tukwilawa.gov Project Description: The City of Tukwila has received an application from Baker Commodities Inc. for a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Review to replace one waste water storage tank and to add a new tank. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 or via email to Stacy.MacGregor@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on October 22, 2013.You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. City of Tukwila Notice of Application SEPA Environmental Review, Baker Commodities Location : 5795 S. 130th PL Tukwila WA 98178 File # E13-016 Applicant: Baker Commodities INC. Property Owner: Michael Bulleri Project Planner: Stacy.MacGregor@Tukwilawa.gov Project Description: The City of Tukwila has received an application from Baker Commodities Inc. for a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Review to replace one waste water storage tank and to add a new tank. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 or via email to Stacy.MacGregor@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on October 22, 2013.You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. City of Tukwila Notice of Application SEPA Environmental Review, Baker Commodities Location : 5795 S. 130th PL Tukwila WA 98178 File # E13-016 Applicant: Baker Commodities INC. Property Owner: Michael Bulleri Project Planner: Stacy.MacGregor@Tukwilawa.gov Project Description: The City of Tukwila has received an application from Baker Commodities Inc. for a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Review to replace one waste water storage tank and to add a new tank. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 or via email to Stacy.MacGregor@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on October 22, 2013.You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 01 01 M N N 00 CO CO N c-1 00 N 00 N N I\ LO l0 N n N O LI1 l0 l0 O N LO 0 01 ri r -I ri ri r1 e-1 e -I ri 0 N 0 r -I r-1 r -I r -I e -I 0 0 00 CO CO CO 00 00 00 00 0 N 00 00 00 00 00 LO 00 CO 01 01 01 01 01 01 LO LO 01 LO 01 01 01 01 01 n 01 01 0 gLUWUJ LU UJ le le w w W D U H to N N I- I- N N w cc 0 0 4-4 CC LAST NAME FIRST NAME 100 ANDOVER PARK W STE 150 PMB 115 13001 EMPIRE WAY S 13001 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY 13001 MARTIN LUTHER KING WAY S 13500 INTERURBAN AVE S 13900 INTERURBAN AVE S OMAHA NE 1400 DOUGLAS STOP 1640 OMAHA NE 1416 DODGE ST # 325 LOS ANGELES CA 4020 BANDINI BLVD EASTBOROUGH KS 48 MISSION RD RENTON WA 501 MONSTER RD SW 5729 PAMELA DR 5795 S 130TH PL L L 0) 0) 0) JO JO in E E E O) a) 0) G C C > >- >- 0 O c cc cc c c w w a a U O m CO Z Z (00 E E E °6.3 c° -0 z i 2 2 3 E E E LU w Z Z H Q Q 2 2 m In u u u v1 2 :( SEATTLE WA 9125 10TH AVE S SEATTLE WA PO BOX 22167 FORT WORTH TX PO BOX 961089 BNSF RAILWAY CO BELLEVUE WA 3190 160th AVE SE NW REGIONAL OFFICE DEPT OF ECOLOGY AUBURN WA 39015 172nd AVE SE MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program Karen Walter it - to c J .15 L (0 m 0 0 ? 06 c a O o › a) 5 2 2 u o cc U * O 0 0 * * * <* * * * m* * * Teri Svedahl From: Courtney Johnson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:53 AM To: Teri Svedahl Cc: Stacy MacGregor Subject: Parcel Mailing Teri, Could you circulate mailings for properties around parc- # 0001400005 it an be sent on or before October 8th 2013. Post card is at W:\Users\Courtney Johnson\BAKER COMMODITIES\FINAL.NOA BAKER COMMOD.pub Thank you, Courtney Courtney Johnson Planning Intern City of Tukwila Courtney.Johnson@tukwilawa.gov (206) 431-3662 Ef The City of opportunity, the community of choice. 1(6 RLA--- (Y-(1 Print Map Page Page 1 of 1 Parcel Map and Data ... 0090,=^llOTd 0060. 2\ N.,. fir/ 1',,: W �J ' ' \,, ^a r y . MD \ � � 0518 0545 054D 0077 11041 t,:o- 0008. /0/"... Tukwila ,\ 0049 ( 00050002 Duwa t?isYDR Iver 0003 �' 0006 \I*soi/i s\(,\, \\\ 5 (C) 2010 King County ` Ofift mom Parcel Number 0001400005 Site Address 5795 S 130TH PL Zip code 98178 Taxpayer BAKER COMMODITIES INC The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." King County 1 GIS Center 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.kingeounty.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 09/26/2013 .1,1, lot 8'4tti,Ave'8 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number cis- 016 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works I►] Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: /4-% %rurict -aiii k 1/1s7lfritc rtf- / 12 7/c1 % QxiaLini `fes ;(1 K Address: -- ° %ci cu (Sd. 13o` " Pt rol/ot_ wig got Date --- transmitted: '- / 3 requested by: --/^ so _ t3 Staff /x® 01, coordinator: L le�� / j°hIlLs� Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) ANICD C5L v‘ s \ SIS Plan check date: 01\ '2_z\\ - Comments\\\\ prepared bY\aX�T '`MS) Update date: 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RECEIVED SEP, 16 2013 TUK�11U'` PUBIC WORKS File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building n Planning Public Works 101 Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project:. boL� rovn I m f nw4 I 1 rrt r - J 00,p/we isiiiii T_n /c Address: (/ J ? % c_Sn I /6`' l TO Ia W q) 8 Date transmitted: 0 - -(3 Response 2 requested by: q — �% 3 Staff coordinator: b,IDhn'tsa�! Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) (s E E r i4 C.l E.D Com tE / ,0147,'1 9/zo�i3 Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: MEMORANDUM www.tulcwilaAtukwilawa.gov Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Courtney Johnson, Planner FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: September 20, 2013 SUBJECT: Baker Commodities 5795 S. 130th PL TL no. 000140-0005 SEPA — E13-016 Public Works has the following comment. The Environmental Checklist should be revised as follows: B. Environmental Elements 5. Animals c. Yes — This area is part of the Pacific Flyway. A primary corridor for migratory bird species. Page 1 of 1 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number EOl2 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building ❑I Planning 111 Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: A ( _r ooric K i t s 3-r?/l J-thirtiplacc eNb Address: J _ 7-'�/�G� 5i qts - o [_3� P Vv p01 `1 Date transmitted: q response (�3o ,' requested by: 3 Staff coordinator: ui to J t truoiv Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: Comments, . Update date: (1-0-13 prepared by: September 23, 2013 Mr. Michael Bulleri PO Box 58368 Seattle WA 98138 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Subject: SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, FOR TANK REPLACEMENT AND INSTALLMENT File Number: E13-016 and PL13-041 Dear Mr. Bulleri, Your application for a SEPA Environmental Review is considered complete on September 23, 2013, for the purpose of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. A public notice has to be provided within 14 days of this letter. The city will coordinate the postcard mailing and the notice board posting. However, you need to make a payment directly to Fast Signs in the amount of $365. Fast Signs is located in the Springbrook Business Park at 7825 S. 180th Street in Kent and their phone number is (206) 575-2110. You will need to provide site address and file number to Fast Signs. Your file number is E13-016. Please let me know once the payment has been made. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 431-3662. Sincerely, Courtney Johnson Planning Department cc. E13-016 Baker Commodities Inc. Recycfipg for Life S�@ 10 0 )\" tilf‘15 tt.A tLfix September 6, 2013 Dear Ms. Dhaliwal, Responses to Pre -application Meeting on Unclassified Use Concerns: Subject: TMC 18.66.120 A) The total area of the site has not been increased. The tanks are in existing containment lagoon (see enclosed site plan showing new tanks). B) No new truck traffic. This does not increase the raw material tonnage coming into property. New tank allow for more retention time for waste water created from existing tonnage. Retention time gives us the ability to treat water more efficiently and better quality. C) No new facilities are located in the shoreline buffer. Site plan included in application showing that tanks are to be located outside of the shoreline buffer (i.e., outside the Ordinary High Water Mark). D) New tanks comply with standards set forth in TMC 18.66.130. Items are addressed in the following paragraph. E) As stated in Item B above, the tanks are for increased storage only. Therefore, installation of tanks does not increase manufacturing capacity. F) New tanks are shorter in height than existing tanks and smaller in volume. Therefore, they will not increase the extent of any nonconformity of any structure due to height, bulk or setback for Light Industrial zone. Shoreline buffer provisions are meet, see item C above. Subject: TMC 18.66.120 1) New tanks are installed in containment area as stated above in Item A. Calculations are enclosed showing that existing containment area is of sufficient size to contain a spill of the largest storage facility so protected. 2) New tank will be connected to existing odor abatement system. Because these water tanks are not heated as part of their processing a very small amount of odor is directed toward through vent line to incinerator. Incinerator (Waste Heat Boiler) is a 9000 cfm boiler. Again please keep in mind we are replacing one existing 20,000 gallon waste water tank and adding one new tank. 3) The new tanks do comply with air pollution control requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. See attached documentation for standards and that www.bakercommodities.com ^ (206) 243-7387 IVA (206) 243-3412 5795 South 130th Place, Seattle, WA 98178 Baker Commodities is aware and meets these provisions. Our Puget Sound Air Pollution Control facility ID number is 12196. 4) A copy of our SPCCP plan is on file with the DCD. We have enclosed a copy of it with this submittal for your reference. We feel we have addressed all of the issues raised by the City and respectfully request for a waiver of submitting an Unclassified Use permit. If there are any other items you need concerning this matter to help in your review please don't hesitate to contact me at the number or email provided below. Sincerely Baker Commodities Inc Michael L. Bulleri General Manager (206) 243-7387 mbulleri@bakercommodities.com CONTAINMENT VOLUME CALCULATIONS PROJECT NAME: BAKER COMMODITIES PROJECT NUMBER: I3.0M 17IIP - .ENGINEERING, PS STRUCTURAL BUILDING CONSULTANTS SHEET OIi/I9/13 DESIGN BY: IBRD CONCRETE PIT AREA CHECK GROSS STORAGE VOLUME AreaA=50ftx40ftx3ft= 6,000 ft3 Area B = 39.5 ft x 20 ft x 4.5 ft = 3,555 ft3 AreaC=39.5 ftx 30ft x 4.5 ft = 5,333 ft3 Area D= 50 ft x 19.5 ft x 4.5 ft = 4,388 ft3 TOTAL GROSS storage area = 19,275 ft3 LARGEST TANK VOLUME (Per City of Tukwila TMC 18.66.130 & 8/12/13 Pre -App Response) Existing (E) Tank #14 =82,000 gallons = 10,963 ft3 New (N) W-1 or W-2 = 22,997 gallons = 2,938 ft3 LARGEST Tank Volume = 10,963 ft3 (Largest of existing or new) Storage volume =110% of Total Tank Volume = 1.1 x 10,963 = 12,059 ft3 STORAGE REDUCTION VOLUME Area A (E) Tank Volume reduction = (4)(3')(Pi)(ll FT)2/4 + (2)(31(PI)(13 FT)2/4 + (31(Pl)(6 F11214 2,022 ft3 Area B (N) Tank Volume reduction =.(2)(2.51(P1)(12 FT)2/4 = 565 ft3 Area B (N) Slab reduction = 2 ft x 34.5 ft x 20 ft 1,380 ft3 Area Co (E) Tank Volume reduction = 4 ftx 4 ft x 16 ft = 256 ft3 TOTAL Net Reduction in area = 4,223 ft3 TOTAL NET STORAGE AFTER ADDITION OF NEW TANKS & SLAB = GROSS VOLUME - STORAGE REDUCTION VOLUME 15,052 ft3 ADDITIONAL STORAGE REQUIRED = 0 ft3 Existing lagoon or storage area sufficient • • (144°iV V° °_!._PJ.e.;�P... STRUCTURE - GENERAL LAYOUT Existing Tanks & Structure -no- 1 -to 14- New tanks no -15 1. MAIN ROAD AROUND PLANT 2. TRUCK LOADING AREA 3. TANK LOADING PUMP 4. CLEARING TANK - 6' DIAMETER, 8' HIGH, CAPACITY 2,003.0 LBS 5. 11' DIAMETER, 40' HIGH TANK, CAPACITY 97.38 TONS 6. 11' DIAMETER, 40' HIGH TANK, CAPACITY 97.38 TONS 7. 11' DIAMETER, 40' HIGH TANK, CAPACITY 97.38 TONS 8. 11' DIAMETER, 40' HIGH TANK, CAPACITY 97.38 TONS 9. 13' DIAMETER, 34' HIGH TANK, CAPACITY 94 TONS 10. 13' DIAMETER, 34' HIGH TANK, CAPACITY 94 TONS 11. 50'XIO0' LAGOON 12. GREASE CONTAINER CLEANING AREA 13. FUEL PUMP ISLAND - GAS AND DIESEL 14. 82,000 GAL RAW WATER TANK (WITH BRIM) 15. Two waste water storage tanks 12' diameter 26' high capacity for each tank is 21,997 gallons and weight 91.3 tons full. To be set in the remaining 40'x 40' Containment Lagoon. THE LAGOON I8 OVER 200 FEET FROM OUR PROPERTY LINES. ALL WATER OR SPILLAGE IN THE LAGOON IS PUMPED TO OUR WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. August 12, 2013 City of Tukwila Jim Hca erton, Mayor yor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Mike Bulleri Baker Commodities Inc PO Box 58368 Seattle, WA 98138 RE: Pre -Application Meeting PRE13-014 Dear Mr. Bulled: Enclosed please find the written comments from those departments present at your pre -application meeting held on August 1, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. Should you have any questions after reviewing the enclosed information, please feel free to contact the appropriate staff member. I have enclosed a copy of the sign in sheet which Lists those present at your meeting. If you should have any general questions relating to the next step in the process, please feel free to contact me at (206)431-3672. We hope this information is helpful to you and your team and look forward to working with you on your project. Sincerely, IGhh, qbe- Brenda Holt Permit Coordinator enc) xc: PRE13-014 bh H:\Pre- 630 IicatiotAPREI3-014 - letter.docx. iouthcenter Boulevard, Suite -1tr 08/12/2013 • Tukwila, as hIngten. 98188 • P one 206-431-3670 • I ax ►6-431-3665 The following performance standards shall apply to rendering plants, in addition to the performance standards for the applicable zoning district: A. Any new facilities constructed at a rendering plant whichwill be used for storage or transmission of liquid.or semi-liquid products will be protected by containment facilities capable of preventing the release of any product into surface or ground waters in the event of a Sf more 4 v►- one Skog d ky'0044►an4z+evs. carat► iS spill or breakage.4 pro ethea eo n ac:itihs? SuctA ww `►1isok ,tea, 10u4deck sMt.# C.¢vv40.1,-, Spkt1 o �i . . B. Any new facies will utilize the best feasible odor abatement equipment and shall be designed, constructed and operated so that the new facilities will not increase the risk of odor emissions from the site. C. The facility, including both existing and new facilities, shall comply with applicable air pollution control requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency, including both procedural and substantive standards D. A copy of the current Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCCP) as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency shall be on file with the DCD. 6503AG02.rdj -1t 44.4. 10.rle " yIz,r oNe -t y, SWt4SSt - cc4,1.i ge,NIVE.ckecl II. Also, per T €C18.66.130, the following performance standards shall apply: Provide documentation on how the proposal complies with the following standards: 1. Any new facilities constructed at a rendering plant which shall be used for storage or transmission of liquid or semi-liquid products will be protected by containment facilities capable of preventing the release of any product into surface or ground waters in the event of a spill or breakage. If more than one storage or transmission facility is protected by a containment facility, such containment facility shall be of sufficient size to contain a spill of the largest storage or transmission facility so protected. 2. Any new facilities will utilize the best feasible odor abatement control equipment and shall be designed, constructed and operated so that the new facilities will not increase the risk of odor emissions from the site. 3. The facility, including both existing and new facilities, shall comply with applicable air pollution control requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency, including both procedural and substantive standards. 4. A copy of the current Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCCP) for the new facilities required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency shall be on file with the DCD. III. SEPA review is required. Staff requested clarification from the Department of Ecology on whether a SEPA review is required or not. The Department of Ecology has confirmed that SEPA is required. SEPA application is attached. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC Plan) Baker Commodities, Inc. Seattle Division Seattle, Washington September, 2011 Seeler Engineering, P.C. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC Plan) Baker Commodities, Inc. Seattle Division Seattle, Washington September, 2011 Prepared By Seeler Engineering, P.C. 1151 Pittsford -Victor Road Suite 125 Pittsford, New York 14534 585-248-9520 aker Commodities, Seattle Division Spill-revention Control & Countermeasure Plan Contents Approvals & Certifications 1 Management Approval 1 Engineer's Certification 1 Section 1 General Information 2 1.1 Name of Facility 2 1.2 Type of Facility 2 1.3 Location of Facility 2 1.4 Name and Address of Owner or Operator 2 1.5 Designated Person Accountable for Oil Spill Prevention at Facility 2 1.6 Facility Description 2 1.7 Spill History 4 1.8 Potential Spills 4 1.9 Containment 5 1.10 Containment Dikes 6 1.11 Inspections, Records, Annual Reports and Updates 6 1.12 Personnel, Training, and Spill Prevention Procedures 6 Section 2 Design and Operating Information 7 2.1 Facility Drainage 7 2.2 Bulk Storage Tanks 7 2.3 Facility Transfer Operations, Pumping, and In -plant Process 8 2.4 Facility Tank Car & Tank Truck Loading/Unloading 8 2.5 Security 8 Section 3 Personnel and Responsibilities 10 3.1 Introduction 10 3.2 Personnel 10 3.3 Equipment and Materials 10 3.4 Prevention of Accidental Oil Discharger 10 3.5 Procedures for the Containment and Removal of Any Accidental Oil Spill 11 Figures Drawing Number 1 Plot Plan Tables Table 1 Seattle Facility Tanks Attachments Attachment 1 Spill History Attachment 2 Facility Inspection and Record Requirements Attachment 3 Owner's Plan Review Log Attachment 4 SPCC Plan Modifications Log Attachment 5 Contact List Attachment 6 Cross Reference Table Completed Monthly Inspection Forms Seeler Engineering, P.C. j Baker Commodities. Seattle Division Spill Preiention Control & Countermeasure Plan Management Approval Approvals & Certifications This SPCC Plan will be implemented as herein described and is in full compliance with the requirements listed in 40CFR Part 112 and with those requirements of the State of Washington. Signature: Name: Title: Engineer's Certification Mr. Mike Bulleri General Manager I hereby certify that 1 have visited and examined the facility and being familiar with the provisions of 40 CFR, Part 112, attest that this SPCC Plan considers applicable industry standards and has been prepared in accordance with requirements of 40 CFR, Part 112, and the State of Washington that the procedures for required inspections and testing have been established and, that the plan is adequate for the facility. Date: September, 2011 Scelcr Engineering. P.C. Tim A. Seeler, P.E. c Signature of Registered Professional Engineer Registration No.: 58036 State: New York Page 1 esker Commodities, Seattle Divisio.. Spill revention Control & Countermeasure 'Ilan 1.1 Name of Facility Baker Commodities Inc. Section 1 General Information 1.2 Type of Facility Subpart B - On -shore, Bulk Storage & Distribution Terminal/Non Production Subpart C — Onshore Production Facility 1.3 Location of Facility 5795 South 130th Place Seattle, Washington 98178 1.4 Name and Address of Owner or Operator Name: Baker Commodities Inc. Address: 5795 South 130`h Place Seattle, Washington 98178 1.5 Designated Person Accountable for Oil Spill Prevention at Facility Name and Title: Mr. James Pairsh, Plant Manager 1.6 Facility Description This facility, as shown on the figure included as Drawing Number 1, is a rendering facility. Petroleum products are stored in bulk form to support the collection of raw products and the production and distribution of animal fats and vegetable oils (AFVO) as well as dry meat meal products. The operations are, therefore subject to Subpart B - Onshore Bulk Storage and Distribution Facility (non -production) requirements as well as requirements under Subpart C — Requirements for Animal Fats and Oils and Greases, and Fish and Marine Oils; and for Vegetable Oils, including Oils from Seed, Nuts, Fruits, and Kernels as an onshore production facility. The facility contains 33 aboveground storage tanks (Total Storage 722,475 Gal.) subject to these regulations, and two underground storage tanks (USTs) (12,000 Gal.), as scheduled on the Drawing Number 1, for storage of Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils (AFVO), Waste Oil, Diesel Fuel for Vehicles, Gasoline, Hydraulic Oil, and various Motor Oils incidental to maintaining Baker's vehicle fleet. The USTs are regulated under 40CFR Part 281 and are not subject to this plan. All deliveries to the facility are made by truck. Products are then distributed to customers by truck. Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 2 Seattle Division Tanks aker Commodities, Seattle Divisioi Spill revention Control & Countermeasure Ilan Seattle Division Tank No. Capacity (gallons) Contents 1 53,300 AFVO 2 37,000 AFVO North (N) 53,300 AFVO South (S) 53,300 AFVO 7 21,400 AFVO 8 23,000 AFVO 9 23,000 AFVO 10 23,000 AFVO 11 23,000 AFVO 12 53,300 AFVO 13 21,400 AFVO 14 25,000 AFVO 15 22,500 AFVO 16 25,000 AFVO 17 25,000 AFVO 18 8,000 AFVO 19 8,000 AFVO 20 11,000 AFVO P1 27,700 AFVO P2 27,700 AFVO P3 27,700 AFVO P4 27,700 AFVO P5 25,400 AFVO P6 24,600 AFVO A 9,700 AFVO B 9,700 AFVO C 9,700 AFVO D 9,700 AFVO Diesel UST 10,000 Diesel Gasoline UST 2,000 Gasoline Heating Oil 275 Heating Oil Hydraulic Oil 275 Hydraulic Oil Hydraulic Oil 275 Hydraulic Oil Waste Oil #1 275 Waste Oil Waste Oil #2 275 Waste Oil Total Storage Volume = 722,475 gallons Seder Engineering. P.C. Page 3 aker Commodities, Seattle Divisioi Spill revention Control & Countermeasure Plan 1.7 Spill History See Attachment #1 1.8 Potential Spills - Prediction & Control SOURCE TYPE OF FAILURE QTY L (GAL) RATE (GAL/MIN) DESCRIPTION OF FLOW SECONDARY CONTAINMENT A. Above Ground Storage Tanks for Grease and Trap Water Tank or Pipe Leak or Rupture Overfill Truck Off- Loading to Facility Truck Loading for Transport From Facility 53,300 500 6,500 6,500 Variable Variable Variable Variable To Site Containment To Site Containment To Site Containment To Site Containment Site is fully paved and diked for containment. Site is sloped to collection sumps and all fluids are collected and pumped to treatment Site is fully paved and diked for containment. Site is sloped to collection sumps and all fluids are collected and pumped to treatment. Site is fully paved and diked for containment. Site is sloped to collection sumps and all fluids are collected and pumped to treatment. Site is fully paved and diked for containment. Site is sloped to collection sumps and all fluids are collected and pumped to treatment. B. Above Ground Waste Oil Tanks Tank Leak or Rupture Tank Filling Tank Draw 275 Variable Variable Variable Variable Variable Onto shop floor Onto shop floor Onto shop floor Masonry impervious floor Masonry impervious floor Masonry impervious floor C. Heating and Hydraulic Oil Tank Leak or Rupture Tank Filling Tank Draw 275 Variable Variable Variable Variable Variable Onto shop floor Onto shop floor Onto shop floor Masonry impervious floor Masonry impervious floor Masonry impervious floor D. Above Ground 55 Gal drums of Motor, Hydraulic, Lube, and Transmission Oil Drum Leak or Rupture Drum Filling Drum Draw 55 Variable Variable Variable Variable Variable Onto shop floor Onto shop floor Onto shop floor Masonry impervious floor I Masonry impervious floor Masonry impervious floor Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 4 aker Commodities, Seattle Divisio Spill .'revention Control & Countermeasure lan The above estimated Total Quantities and Rates are based on the existing system operating parameters and estimated maximum response times. All leaks are immediately addressed and corrected promptly. The attached Drawing Number 1 contains a facility layout drawing showing the bulk storage and transfer areas for this facility. Source A — Above ground Storage Tanks for Grease and Trap Water 27 animal fat/vegetable oil (AFVO) and trap water storage tanks exist at the facility. Animal fats and vegetable oils as well as trap water are non -hazardous products processed and stored at the facility. The processed products are sold to vendors. The products, when heated, are in form of a liquid to allow for easy transfer. These products are generally in a waxy, semi-solid state at ambient temperatures. The steel storage tanks are heated to approximately 100 degrees Fahrenheit by steam heating coils internal to the tank. Secondary containment is either provided by concrete masonry systems around individual tanks or groupings of tanks (Tanks P1 — P5, #21) or secondary containment is provided by the site (remaining tanks). In either case the entire site is diked and paved. All waters, rainwater, truck wash waters, or accidental spills, are collected by sumps located around the site. The waters are then reprocessed to collect useable products and treated waters discharged to the municipal sewer system under a sewer permit. All product fill piping, valves and transfer pumps are above grade. All piping and valves are visually inspected periodically. Product is manually pumped from cooking and process areas to the storage tanks. Tanks are not equipped with audible alarms or level indicators but are manually gauged before transfer to verify that sufficient volume is available in the tank for the desired transfer. The transfer process is monitored continuously through transfer. Product taken out of the facility is pumped to tanker trucks parked in the contained site. Catastrophic failure of the secondary containment system could result in a release to the Duwamish River which bounds the site on three sides. Source B — Above Ground Waste Oil Tanks The two above ground 275 gallon waste oil tanks are constructed of steel. The tanks are located on a covered portion of a concrete slab between two portions of the maintenance shop building. Waste oil is collected in the maintenance areas inside and outside the building and transferred to the waste oil tanks manually. The tanks are visually inspected and manually gauged to determine product level before product is transferred. Failure of the tank would result in a release to the concrete floor and sump area adjacent to the building. These areas are sufficiently contained and impervious. Source C - Heating and Hydraulic Oil Tanks The three above ground 275 gallon heating and hydraulic oil tanks are constructed of steel. The tanks are located inside a building and on a concrete slab. Heating oil is pumped to the heating unit inside the building. Hydraulic oil is transferred to the point of use by hand in small containers. Failure of a tank would result in a release to the concrete floor and sump inside the building. These areas are sufficiently contained and impervious. Source D — 55 Gallon Drums The 55 gallon drums of various motor oils are contained inside or adjacent to the existing maintenance building structures on concrete floors. Product is manually transferred to point of use. Any spill would be contained inside the building or on the impervious pavement and sump area adjacent to the building. 1.9 Containment Containment, diversionary structures and/or equipment to prevent fats, oils, and greases as well as Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 5 siker Commodities, Seattle Division Spill -revention Control & Countermeasure lan petroleum products from reaching navigable waters are practicable and are in place. 1.10 Containment Dikes Containment dikes, berms, or retaining walls are sufficiently impervious to contain spilled oil. Containment systems for petroleum consist of concrete floors and walls, and containment systems for Fats and Grease are constructed of concrete and pavement. 1.11 Inspections, Records, Annual Reports and Updates Required inspections follow written procedures. The written procedures and inspection forms are included as Attachment #2. Records of inspections, signed by the appropriate supervisor or inspector, are maintained in the back of this binder. The Plant Manager shall complete a review of this plan annually, at a minimum. Following a review the Plant Manager will complete the certification contained on the review log included as Attachment #3. Any changes made to this plan must be logged on the SPCC Plan Modification Log included as Attachment #4. Changes made to the physical facilities that affect the nature of response to a spill must be reviewed by a licensed professional. 1.12 Personnel, Training, and Spill Prevention Procedures Personnel are properly instructed in: (1) Operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent oil discharges, and (2) Applicable pollution control laws, rules, and regulations. All personnel responsible for spill prevention and containment are given a copy of the SPCC Plan and an initial instruction session. The instruction covers operation and maintenance procedures and all applicable pollution control laws, as indicated in the SPCC Plan. Scheduled prevention briefings for the operating personnel are conducted frequently enough to assure adequate understanding of the SPCC Plan. Briefings occur at a minimum once per year for each individual or as changes in regulations or laws require. Any changes in the physical plant structure or operations would and an update. Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 6 aker Commodities, Seattle Divisio Spill revention Control & Countermeasure Ian Section 2 Design and Operating Information 2.1 Facility Drainage Drainage from diked storage areas is controlled. The entire site is constructed as an impervious pad. All flow from tanks, loading areas, offloading areas, and piping drain to sumps located around the site. From the sumps any collected rain water or any spilled product is manually pumped to storage in the Wastewater Treatment Plant for recovery of usable fats and greases. Waters are then treated and discharged to the municipal sewer system under permit. Drainage from undiked areas is controlled in the site sump at the northeast corner of the site. Any drainage is pumped to the wastewater treatment system and treated water discharged to the municipal sewer system under permit. Drainage of rain water from secondary containment is not discharged into a storm drain or an open watercourse. Rainwater collected in the tallow and grease storage areas or in any paved area of the site flows to drains and then to sumps. Collected water is pumped to the facility's wastewater treatment area and discharged under permit to the municipal sewer system. 2.2 Bulk Storage Tanks Tank Design Aboveground bulk storage tanks are constructed of steel and are compatible with the material stored. Product is manually pumped from tallow cooking and bulk grease process areas to the grease/tallow tanks. Prior to transferring product, the receiving tank and associated piping and valves are visually inspected and manually gauged to ensure successful transfer. The tanks do not contain level indicators or alarms. Secondary Containment Data The site is paved and graded to slope to collection sumps located around the site. A containment berm has been constructed around the perimeter of tanks P1 through P5 and #21. All other tanks drain to site sumps within site limits. Tank Inspection and Testing Tanks are routinely inspected. Facility Inspection Reports (included within Attachment #3) are completed monthly and maintained with this plan. Internal Heating Coils The grease and tallow tanks are heated with steam which is not re -circulated. Steam condensate discharges to the paved surface where it is visually monitored for potential coil leaks. Disposal Facilities for Plant Effluents Discharged into Navigable Waters There are no discharges to navigable waters at this facility. All waters are collected and processed through the wastewater treatment system to recover fats, oils, and greases. Waters generated from this recovery operation are discharged to the municipal sewer system by permit. Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 7 aker Commodities, Seattle Divisioi Spill revention Control di Countermeasure 'lin 2.3 Facility Transfer Operations, Pumping, and In -plant Process Corrosion Protection Buried pipelines do not exist at the site. Aboveground pipes are constructed of steel or stainless steel and visually monitored. Pipeline Terminal Connections are Capped of Blank -Flanged Pipeline terminal connections are capped or blank -flanged and marked if the pipeline is not in service or on standby service for extended periods. Terminal connections for grease and tallow tanks are valved closed and locked when not in use. Terminal connections for fuel are capped when not in use. Piping and valves are labeled as necessary when not in service. Pipe supports are designed to minimize abrasion and corrosion and allow for expansion and contraction. Piping contains expansion loops where necessary and pipe supports are configured to allow for expansion/movement. Pipe Inspection All piping, loading and unloading systems, and containment areas are inspected informally daily and formally monthly by operating personnel during the course of their regular duties. Vehicle Warning Aboveground pipes are located remotely from the loading rack or any vehicular access or are clearly marked with signage to call attention to the piping. 2.4 Facility Tank Car & Tank Truck Loading/Unloading Materials are transported to and from the facility using tank trucks. No rail service is available. Loading/unloading procedures meet the minimum requirements and regulations of the Department of Transportation. The unloading area has a quick drainage system. The containment system will hold the maximum capacity of any single compartment of a tank truck loaded/unloaded in the plant. The largest tank truck for tallow and grease used at this facility has a capacity of 6500 gallons. Fuel oil tank compartments are limited to 2,500 gallons. At the loading/unloading area for fuel oil and grease/tallow tanks, product drains via the sloped concrete pads to sumps. The paved area and sump provide sufficient volume to contain a spill. Warning signs are provided in loading/unloading areas to prevent vehicular departure before disconnect of transfer lines. To prevent premature departure the Plant Operator is present during loading/unloading operations and inspects the tank truck during disconnection, and through departure. Wheel chucks are also used and present within the loading/unloading area. Signs are posted in the loading/unloading areas as a reminder to prevent premature departure. Drains and outlets on tank trucks and tank cars are checked for leakage before loading/unloading procedures and prior to departure. 2.5 Security The facility is fenced along perimeter where accessible by foot traffic or vehicle. Entrance gates are locked and/or guarded when the plant is unattended or not in production. Any valves which permit direct outward flows of a tank's contents are locked closed when in non-operating or standby status. Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 8 111Pesker Commodities, Seattle Divisioi Spit revention Control & Countermeasure 'Ilan Starter Controls on all oil pumps in non-operating standby status are: (1) locked in the off position, and/or (2) located at site accessible only to authorized personnel. The facility is located in an isolated area of Seattle. All vehicles must enter the plant site through a gated entrance which is locked when the plant is not in operation. The facility is completely fenced along the rail line bounding the site to the east and bounded by the river on the other three sides, thereby restricting access. There is a resident site caretaker which monitors the site in off hours. The facility contains sufficient lighting during nighttime hours and monitored continuously by video cameras. Pump controls are located in secure areas and accessible only to plant personnel. Lighting is sufficient to allow for the discovery of spills and to discourage unauthorized persons from entering the facility premises during hours of darkness. Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 9 aker Commodities, Seattle Division Spill revention Control & Countermeasure lan Section 3 Personnel and Responsibilities 3.1 Introduction This plan is to provide a guide for the organization of all concerned, in order to perform adequate activities on the behalf of terminal personnel, in the event of an accidental oil discharge. 3.2 Personnel Plant Manager The Plant Manager is on duty during business week days. The Plant Manager has responsibility for the tank storage area and all product transfer operations from the loading and unloading areas. The Plant Manager is fully aware of all contingency plans in the event of any emergency and has, at hand, a copy of this SPCC Plan for reporting and containing oil discharges. In the event of an accidental discharge of product, he will assume the responsibility of supervising the implementation of this plan for the containment and recovery of all product spilled. Plant Operator The Plant Operator performs inspections of all physical components and operations of transfer pumps, maintenance of product inventory, initial reception of incoming tank trucks, gauging and or checking of the tank truck, including the tank into which fuel/product from the tank trucks will be transferred and transfer of product (tallow & grease) to tanker trucks. The Plant Operator is responsible for initiating calls to the Plant Manager and other plant personnel as needed in the event of a spill. The Plant Operator has been given a copy of this plan so that he/she will be familiar with the general procedure of the operations and can answer and advise those concerned as events occur, as well as to relay information from and to field personnel. 3.3 Equipment and Materials Sufficient absorbent is located on the premises (in the garage) to meet the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency, and State of Washington. In the event additional cleanup equipment is required, same is available as needed from the cleanup contractor: Foss Environmental & Infrastructure 1-800-337-7745 3.4 Prevention of Accidental Oil Discharger 1. The terminal management will require all of the designated employees listed as qualified to assume the duties of the Plant Operator to be thoroughly versed in all of the operating procedures. 2. The grease and diesel fuel loading and unloading area have pumping equipment and small discharge containment equipment available at all times and meets the minimum requirements. 3. All containment area drains are clean and free from debris. 4. During loading and unloading operations, drivers are required to set parking brake and Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 10 aker Commodities, Seattle Divisio Spill 'revention Control & Countermeasure lan chock wheels before loading or unloading. Truck tanks, piping and fittings shall be inspected for leaks before and after loading or unloading. 5. Prior to product delivery, all receiving tanks shall be manually gauged to determine that the available capacity is sufficient to receive the volume of product to be transferred. 6. No tank truck hose will be permitted in way of the unloading pipeline unless the open end is covered securely with a blank plate. 7. All terminal flange connections at the unloading pipe will be blanked secure when not in service. 8. All terminal transfer equipment will be closed and secured when not in service. 9. In the event of any failure of communications or the slightest doubt that all equipment is functioning in proper manner, then transfer operations will be stopped until all operating equipment has been examined and proven in good working order and condition. 3.5 Procedures for the Containment and Removal of Any Accidental Oil Spill In the event of any form of oil spill, the following procedures will be immediately instituted: 1. Upon detection of an oil or grease/tallow discharge, the Plant Operator will alert the tank truck personnel and arrange to immediately shut down all transfer operations. After closing the transfer valve at the hose connection on the unloading area, the Plant Operator will immediately alert the Plant Manager. 2. The Plant Operator will then determine the extent of the discharge, the approximate gallons discharged, and will report details to management, and will immediately start the organization of plant personnel for the containment and removal of the discharged oil. 3. The Plant Operator will then confine the oil spill. 4. The Plant Operator will also arrange to place oil absorbent. 5. Upon the arrival of the terminal crew, all cleanup operations will be under the direction of the Plant Manager. 6. After the product has been secured in place, all product will be fully contained to permit removal. 7. After the product has been secured in place, the product will be removed by pumping the product into a storage tank or tank truck. 8. When the Plant Manager has seen to the immediate organization of cleanup operations, he/she will arrange to advise the proper authorities and describe all events in detail as indicated: (1) Name of Terminal: Baker Commodities Inc. Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 1 1 laker Commodities, Seattle Division. Spill-revention Control & Countermeasure 'tan Location: 5795 South 130th Place Seattle, Washington 98178 Telephone Number: (206) 243-7387 Name of Employee Calling: (your name) (2) Estimated size of spill: (approx. gallons spilled and area affected) (3) Type of product discharged: (No. 6 oil, grease/tallow, motor oil, etc.) (4) Time accident occurred: (5) Type of equipment involved: (Describe apparent cause of the accident, such as overflow or pipe rupture) (6) Details of containment and removal operations. (7) Weather conditions, direction and velocity of wind. (8) Status of control for cleanup. Is outside assistance going to be required, such as a cleanup contractor? 9. After having attended to all of the foregoing, the Plant Manager and the Plant Operator will prepare a general description of all events from the moment of the accident to the moment of the telephone calls should be given and an indication of the progress of the cleanup operations and probable success of all operations. 10. The Plant Manager will function in the cleanup coordinating all operations with the State or other municipal authorities or regulatory agencies. 11. Facility management will have at hand lists of all outside contractors, an inventory of their equipment and their ability to come on to the scene with sufficient crew and equipment to assist in the cleanup operation as required. 12. ALL OPERATIONS WILL BE UNDER THE COORDINATED DIRECTION OF PLANT MANAGER AND THE "ON SCENE COORDINATOR" FROM THE REQUIRED AGENCY. 13. Only upon complete restoration of the affected area and elimination of the source of the accident will oil transfer operations be resumed. 14. When all of the oil has been removed from the spill and the affecting area completely restored to satisfactory condition, Baker Commodities Inc., and the "On Scene Coordinator" will undertake a thorough inspection of the scene of cleanup operations, and if satisfied that the operations were successful, orders to secure will then be given. 15. After orders to secure have been given, all equipment used in the cleanup process will be refurbished and thoroughly cleaned for replacement into original standby status. In the event there will be any period of time intrinsic equipment will not be available, then equipment equal to that not at hand will be rented from a contractor until such time as the proper equipment has been returned to its proper station. Seeler Engineering, P.C. Page 12 aker Commodities. Seattle Divisions Spill Y-revention Control at Countermeasure Plan The foregoing plan for the containment and removal of any accidental oil discharge in way of and/or in the immediate vicinity of the unloading area for unloading oil carrying tank trucks has been prepared by Baker Commodities Inc. management in compliance with applicable Rules and Regulations and other laws controlling the operation of an on -shore storage and distribution facility (non -production) requirements as well as requirements under Subpart B and Subpart C of 40 CRF Part 112. Seeler Engineering. P.C. Page 13 Figures Figure 1 IN3A3Abd C/1 -11 C C I< P1 J z C Li C2 ti -7 V F6 L u (1j Fl z F f P1 C C1 tz1 I IJJI u'r J 7J I P1 1NJHlb' N1 P1 P1 PD P1 C 3 z CI O C P1 r- P1C7 �J DF- AD o P1 D D z Li -I z �P1 -9rn I1 j zFT o z P1 P1 ce P1 rr1 rrI r- -11V/v\ 1N3HNT\INL7f >I 7 \I N I'-) 1 7 y Tables Table 1 aker Commodities, Seattle Divisio Spil tevention Control $ Countermeasure lan TABLE 1 SEATTLE DIVISION TANKS Seattle Division Tank No. Capacity (gallons) Contents 1 53,300 AFVO 2 37,000 AFVO North (N) 53,300 AFVO South (S) 53,300 AFVO 7 21,400 AFVO 8 23,000 AFVO 9 23,000 AFVO 10 23,000 AFVO 11 23,000 AFVO 12 53,300 AFVO 13 21,400 AFVO 14 25,000 AFVO 15 22,500 AFVO 16 25,000 AFVO 17 25,000 AFVO 18 8,000 AFVO 19 8,000 AFVO 20 11,000 AFVO P1 27,700 AFVO P2 27,700 AFVO P3 27,700 AFVO P4 27,700 AFVO P5 25,400 AFVO P6 24,600 AFVO A 9,700 AFVO B 9,700 AFVO C 9,700 AFVO D 9,700 AFVO Diesel UST 10,000 Diesel Gasoline UST 2,000 Gasoline Heating Oil 275 Heating Oil Hydraulic Oil 275 Hydraulic Oil Hydraulic Oil 275 Hydraulic Oil Waste Oil #1 275 Waste Oil Waste Oil #2 275 Waste Oil Total Storage Volume = 722,475 gallons Seeler Engineering, P.C. Table 1 Attachments Attachment 1 aker Conunodities, Seattle Division Spill revention Control & Countermeasure lan ATTACHMENT #1 SPILL HISTORY Complete this form for any reportable spill(s) which has (have) occurred from this facility: 1. Date: 1988 Volume: 400 to 500 gallons of fish oil Cause: Tank failure to abandoned sewer connection Corrective action taken: Sewer removed. Minimal material left to be cleaned up. The fish in the river consumed the rest of the oil. Plans for preventing recurrence: 2. Date: Volume: Cause: Corrective action taken: Plans for preventing recurrence: 3. Date: Volume: Cause: Corrective action taken: Plans for preventing recurrence: Seeler Engineering, P.C. Attachment #I Attachment 2 aker Connnodities, Seattle Division. Spill revention Control & Countermeasure Plan ATTACHMENT #2 FACILITY INSPECTION AND RECORD REQUIREMENTS Piping, loading and unloading systems, and containment areas and drainage systems are inspected daily by operating personnel during the course of their regular duties. All visible leaks will be promptly corrected. The following areas of inspection are recorded on the attached MONTHLY INSPECTION CHECKLIST. • Product inventories for all tanks should be reconciled against delivery and sales. All high level alarms, electronic pump control systems and emergency shut offs should be assessed to be in good working condition. • The aboveground diesel, motor oil tank, hydraulic oil tank, and waste oil tank, should be inspected for leaks, spillage, and indications of corrosion or other damage • All pipelines, valves, pumps, and electrical systems are inspected on a monthly basis. An assessment is made of the condition of flange joints, expansion joints, valve glands and packings, pipeline supports, pump seals, and metal surfaces. • All components of the containment areas should also be evaluated. An assessment should be made as to the condition of the concrete and joints, catch basins, crash posts and barriers surrounding soils, ponded water, containment manholes, loading rack, and concrete staining. • The operative condition and quantities of safety spill response equipment, and plant security conditions such as lighting and fencing should be evaluated. Noted minor problems of a routine nature shall be corrected immediately. More serious problems, which present an immediate hazard or require additional resources are reported to management on a Facility Inspection Report (copy attached), which includes a detailed description of the problem, and recommendations for corrective action. If necessary, affected equipment is removed from service until repairs are completed. Seeler Engineering. P.C. Attachment #2 Date: Tanks (All) 111Paker Commodities, Seattle Divisioi Spil revention Control & Countermeasure Plan BAKER COMMODITIES, INC. MONTHLY INSPECTION CHECKLIST Inspectors Signature: COMMENTS REFERRED TO Leaks from tank Y N Leaks from pipes Y N Stained soils Y N Adequate freeboard containment Y N Visible sheen on standing water in dikes Y N Condition of inlet piping S U Condition of outlet piping S U Electronic and manual gauging systems S U High level alarms, electronic pump controls, and emergency shut offs S U Valves locked closed when not in use Y N Cracks or holes in secondary containment Y N Low spots in secondary containment Y N Rack Areas COMMENTS REFERRED TO Leaks from equipment Y N Condition of loading/unloading containment area S U Stained concrete Y N Drainage unimpeded Y N Safety equipment in place and operative Y N General Area COMMENTS REFERRED TO Lighting Operable S U Fencing in Good Condition and Secure S U Notes: Y = Yes, N= No, S = Satisfactory, U = Unsatisfactory Seeler Engineering, P.C. Attachment #2 Monthly Inspection Checklist Attachment 3 baker Commodities, Seattle Divisioi Spill revention Control & Countermeasure 'lan ATTACHMENT #3 OWNER'S PLAN REVIEW LOG I have completed review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan for the Baker Commodities, Inc. facility in Seattle, Washington and will/will not amend the plan as a result. SIGNED: DATED: I have completed review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan for the Baker Commodities, Inc. facility in Seattle, Washington and wilUwill not amend the plan as a result. SIGNED: DATED: I have completed review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan for the Baker Commodities, Inc. facility in Seattle, Washington and will/will not amend the plan as a result. SIGNED: DATED: I have completed review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan for the Baker Commodities, Inc. facility in Seattle, Washington and will/will not amend the plan as a result. SIGNED: DATED: I have completed review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan for the Baker Commodities, Inc. facility in Seattle, Washington and will/will not amend the plan as a result. SIGNED: DATED: Seder Engineering, P.C. Attachment #3 Attachment 4 ATTACHMENT #4 SPCC PLAN MODIFICATIONS LOG DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Original Document Issued 2011 Update SECTION til LTJ H Q 0 o N \ CS 0 N \ REVISION NUMBER 0 e--4 Attachment #4 Seeler Engineering, P.C. Attachment 5 aker Commodities, Seattle Divisio� SpillTt'revention Control & Countermeasure Plan ATTACHMENT #5 CONTACT LIST Facility Name: Baker Commodities Inc. Facility Location: 5795 South 130th Place, Seattle, Washington 98178 Fire Department: Police Department: Ambulance: All Pollution Incidents Call: National Response Center: WDNR Spill Response Hotline: Fire Department: 1-800-424-8802 (24 hours) 1-360-407-6300 (24 hours) 911 D.O.T. (Hazardous Incident Reports) (202) 426-1830 Medical Emergency: Valley General Hospital 911 Company Personnel - Notify in all Emergencies: Mike Bulleri, Asst. General Manager Ben Cameron, Asst. General Manager James Pairsh, Plant Manager Rick Olsen, Maintenance Manager (W) (206) 243-7387 (W) (206) 243-7387 (W) (206) 243-7387 (W) (206) 243-7387 (C) (206) 795-1317 (C) (206) 200-7107 (C) (206) 498-9837 (C) (253) 229-0863 Emergency Spill Cleanup Contractor: Foss Environmental & Infrastructure 1-800-337-7745 Seeler Engineering, P.C. Attachment #5 Attachment 6 aker Commodities, Seattle Division Spill rrevention Control & Countermeasure 'Plan ATTACHMENT #6 CROSS REFERENCE TABLE llatory Report Section Report RequirementRe Pale # 112.7.a.1 Management Approval 1 112.7.a.2 N/A 7 112.7.a.3 1.6 2 112.7.a.4 3.5 11 112.7.a.5 3.5 11 112.7.b 1.8 4 112.7.c 1.9, 1.10 6 112.7.d N/A 8 112.7.e 1.11 6 112.7.f.1 1.12 6 112.7.f.2 1.5 2 112.7.f.3 1.12 6 112.7.g.1 2.5 8 112.7.g.2 2.5 8 112.7.g.3 2.5 8 112.7.g.4 2.3 8 112.7.g.5 2.5 8 112.7.h.1 2.4 8 112.7.h.2 2.4 8 112.7.h.3 2.4 8 112.7.i 2.2 7 112.7.j Management Approval 1 112.8.a Reference 112.7 112.8.b.1 2.1 7 112.8.b.2 2.1 7 112.8.b.3 2.1 7 112.8.b.4 N/A 112.8.b.5 N/A 112.8.c.1 2.2 7 112.8.c.2 2.2 7 112.8.c.3 2.1 7 112.8.c.4 N/A 8 112.8.c.5 N/A 8 Seeler Engineering, P.C. Regulatory Report Section Report Requirement Page # 112.8.c.6 2.2 7 112.8.c.7 2.2 7 112.8.c.8 2.2 7 112.8.c.9 Attachment #2 112.8.c.10 Attachment #2 112.8.c.11 N/A 112.8.d.1 2.3 8 112.8.d.2 2.3 8 112.8.d.3 2.3 8 112.8.d.4 2.3 8 112.8.d.5 2.3 8 112.12.a Reference 112.7 112.12.b.1 2.1 7 112.12.b.2 2.1 7 112.12.b.3 2.1 7 112.12.b.4 N/A 112.12.b.5 N/A 112.12.c.1 2.2 7 112.12.c.2 2.2 7 112.12.c.3 2.1 7 112.12.c.4 N/A 112.12.c.5 N/A 112.12.c.6 2.2 7 112.12.c.7 2.2 7 112.12.c.8 2.2 7 112.12.c.9 Attachment #2 112.12.c.10 Attachment #2 112.12.c.11 N/A 112.12.d.1 2.3 8 112.12.d.2 2.3 8 112.12.d.3 2.3 8 112.12.d.4 2.3 8 112.12.d.5 2.3 8 Attachment #6 Completed Monthly Inspection Forms END OF DOCUMENT Seeler Engineering, P.C. STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: ila.wa.us T r CEIVED SEP 10 2013 r,. UEVLL(J,• , ML-tJT AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City. its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real r property, located at 7 `i S SG:km ! ..0..Pt ,Srs3iTt�. in it `] E7 a for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. S. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the toss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days. shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. RECEIVED SEP, 16 2013 TUKVvtL -- PUBLIC WORKS EXECUTED at //w/ Z6 (city), tAl!} (state). on }isu 6 uS % 2 0 , 20 / 3 Print Name Address Phone Number Signature a %tom ,w On this day personally appeared before me " t� ir,rt-ee el .rg2io me nown to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. t1ic4c L L ,...J'uLLcri S 79. 5o or'+` P6cczntc (i fl )178 206 2X13- 73&7 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS %(,) DAY OF moye ggpir 20 i/�1 TARY PUB . �rd for he State of Washing on residing at qSN tlotq My Commission expires W:\ Forms \ Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check ttenis �•{.. 1 :.;..5 �,4A stlttecl \ ubs F { . _ .,� Rlths , appltcation 'Tnfortnat'tott mred +` 1.5,., �� ,i A.'f �fY y�,y .� L"i �JA)-..•l�fi �i� }:JYi\,1�v 1�.?r`t`'`,j!;��,Rfi��:: \ 1 �\'lit` i} G�h�\ "{�''a'.Ai iM M1i 4U; S "�% \ l f\S✓� . Y�l S }a.. {`f l ,� , '; t F N s d f a� � di Jbftzybe<wairedihi uni seal cases, upon approval of both 7<14 le, Worksn�xnd Planning , t « t}\r R:.) t,r APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. Vz/ 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). Vi 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17". V 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. REC ►!\ !FT) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: SEP 10 2013 �QaN APPS O�,l}� 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department deternminingthkit a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). / �/ 7. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; Or provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks—must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. NA 8. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 1/ 9. Vicinity Map with site location. 04 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/dcdplan.htm) for additional information. W:\ Forms \ Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SU A Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc NA 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications \ SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: RepLoc,°/-2eN R boo<: L ro rsici 5'}aCol � i o N Ks 2. Name of Applicant: 1 QA 1{e"+ (22)iv»�rocii t"tcS i NC 3. Date checklist prepared: 9/9/13 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction to start upon approval by City. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. IVA Agency Comments W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201l.doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. ,(34J,/ �N 1 /�C:.7 YYji t ye f7 72- Kw: LCL. 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. ,Nj 4r "? bc>00 2 ) 20,. ect (`-, (A C'crle/ rfi� C."z,24Gl/pie NT" ARecs, wcis ,;.'{-e,. irtc;y,- r T 1 1. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. S % 1 61,o i/f /30 TN }2L ;Sec; iif e C fl (7 _i 78 &(C.s i' -/U on<) f. oC, I/ ZOO - 03.5-800 -- C)V 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): mountainous, other: rolling, hilly, steep slopes, Agency Comments b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? N1/4 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Now Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. /✓cD g - About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? A/or✓e h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N% 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: -r-c,„, Ks �/P;✓Tce/ 7-2, /it( 5c.tu/ti�n� 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Greet,/ / DU Z;)o,'i 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /V c7 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. /V,-)A,/e. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. NC) 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. N0 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ND b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. A/o Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. / Lt l,Jcr- t.c Llc'cied o --5 iN7r' c��r c..)(rler 7 rCOtneNI 5 74'M iv 01 oe, t 7o Pu 61,c Se LA) ,, SfStc;-� 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/a Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ,-- Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other V Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other v Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation 3tc.:c K E,r,-r ,<- :� b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Nile c. List threatened ora�++ endangered species known to be on or near the site. C„J[i.vop/e 4 t'�e"C'N.!( LG��%1i5� .4")e 04'h d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New e. Please respond to , questions. Use separate sheets as necL _try. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish heron,a ongbiother: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, Iii i3j trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. C - Glte //77v tJc=,wcash Rioc1+ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed ymeasures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not L ! , f72,''it UC/j.o", I=,Rc'ct - Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. /7/4", r//vri rL<-cTr/c: Agency Comments Please respond to a,. ,aestions. Use separate sheets as neces....iy. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Alb c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: j'I.1/r. ,• e Kz re. iv a 0 o1a hv �o L ,O' /',2J /�� fig s'� Svc: r ��f c� �o Y nN (%S 7. Environmental Health a: Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. I. Describe special emergency services that might be required. C_ 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 7 trees' a re iN,Pfc:LLccer ,N' &w'ts'G/Val_e_sv a' .9/2P<e Please respond to luestions. Use separate sheets as nec .iry. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NNe 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noy✓e. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Nie 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Please respond to ah zaestions. Use separate sheets as neces—y. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. C. P3(..es/ t/c,.v pLc'i/, 574erc 7' .v /-4/9 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A/(19 a,,e%t�L LS e. (A'CZs/fci What is the current zoning classification of the site? u.) —�5- .off 1s dui u AL/ass (4 ""' vim. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Gl /Y 41/0 c✓ /^J h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ive) 14414t , Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? A/A j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: fi% 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Alt.) y Q Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Nj.4 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 27..K,Nsfcit, b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? nioif e c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: n� 7A Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? evy b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/6 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. do b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N J.9 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: j�' /A Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. :zc I3&14 E, TR, b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Z" /1'tv c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N% - d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). n� b e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Nc, Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Nwe g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N& b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: lectriic ' atural gam, ater; refuse servicetelephone)�anitary sewer septic system other: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comment b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Pow z.ti _ Sec Le e `1 Pi>✓ -)t.,\ k (r`t.oto (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS not use this sheet for project actions) ecause these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read thernin co + unction with the list of elements of the environment. When a wering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types o ctivities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greaae intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all qu'e tions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 1. How would the proposals be likely to itease discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. U. _ separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? N'o 146, T Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: ill %.a 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? A/ G (rec. T Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce ' pacts are: Fart rpt er,o4tarr`iW,e_Nk �tcre,S 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect lan'and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? T ce a /.4 A- cceS 1iuseliniC AAS 1 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and tilities? No inr rev / Proposedmeasures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Please respond to all questions. U. separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protec on of the environment. A/e, ('o 'fl« T D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: `57 Date Submitted: 57/Z Ili 3 City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: % 1 2. / 13 Applicant Name: I3A raQ (b Ns Street Address: 5 95 136 1-0 City, State, Zip: 5 ec„7% L (.y,j 58118 Telephone: 2 0(0 2 Y3 - 73 $ 7 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. '`CFIVED SEP 10 2013 LLL) ML -NT WN:\Forms \Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Part A: Please review and wer each question carefully. Considephases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. (i`- Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. N�O�- Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO = Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. �O Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 W:\ Forms\ Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Part A (continued) 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. N9— Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. (NO- Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to �deevvelopment (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. Clot,?)- Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 Part B (continued) 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NOD- Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO)- Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) Part D: Please review ea uestion below for projects that includ ►rk below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. ;- Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. ��j- Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO;- Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. (iNO>>- Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 3-6 Will the project r t in impacts to watercourses or wetlands have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO)- Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO- Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NOS- Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) - YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development ENVIRONMENTAL 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 REVIEW E-mail: tukplan'a'?ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: ,.7b„,, (,,I , ;AtsfaIt hf c usf;tv4 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 6795 S() /00 771 p 5eeLil1<e c,Jf 28/78 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 000-fVO - 0005- O& /2 0 0 6--e, 603 -- o'/ DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: t Address: -7 7 917. Phone: 206 24/.3- 73S7 E-mail: /)2huL,er: ed bo k r COintvtc dl /iCS ec n FAX: 2 y3- 3V/2 Signature: '7746e Date: S7,27 /j 3 W: \Forms\ Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: ,.7b„,, (,,I , ;AtsfaIt hf c usf;tv4 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 6795 S() /00 771 p 5eeLil1<e c,Jf 28/78 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 000-fVO - 0005- O& /2 0 0 6--e, 603 -- o'/ DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: t Address: -7 7 917. Phone: 206 24/.3- 73S7 E-mail: /)2huL,er: ed bo k r COintvtc dl /iCS ec n FAX: 2 y3- 3V/2 Signature: '7746e Date: S7,27 /j 3 W: \Forms\ Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Controlled Environments APPROX. LOCATION OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN EL= 17.5' FROM EXISTING A.L.T.A SURVEY for Science and Industry The information disclosed herein was originofed by and is the property of Controlled Endron- merds Conslruc0on,loc. and ex- cept for rights expressly gran- ted to the customer, Contro- lled Environments Construction, Inc. reserves on potent. proprie- tary, design. use sole, manu- facturing and reproduction rights thereto. O h w U co t6 is - 0_ d 07) 0 so zoQ a�� co Lc) co( I) z w a0 vm. w UDI= w co <w Z DRAWN BY: MAC DATE: 09/03/2013 SCALE: 1 "= 40'-0" JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: SITE PLAN • ULJL'LVI'MLI' 1 STRUCTURAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS 1.0 GENERAL THESE STRUCTURAL NOTES SUPPLEMENT THE SPECIFICATIONS, ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND AMONG THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, HESE NOTES, AND THE SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT, WHO SHALL CORRECT SUCH DISCREPANCY IN WRITING. ANY WORK DONE BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER DISCOVERY OF SUCH DISCREPANCY SHALL BE DONE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE THE DIMENSIONS AMONG ALL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK OR FABRICATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BRACING AND SHORING DURING CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURAL 1.1 CODES ALL METHODS, MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF MARYSVILLE AND: THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC), AS AMENDED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; A.C.I. 318; A.LS.C. 14TH EDITION MANUAL AND AISC 360-2010; AWS 01.1-06; 1.2 DOWN CRL1 A A. VERTICAL LOADS 1. LIVE LOADS N/A 2. DEAD LOADS 12 DIA TANK W CONTENTS 162,600 LBS /7.0 B. LATERAL LOADS: ALLOW 33-1/3£ INCREASE IN STRESSES FOR WIND AND SEISMIC FORCES LATERAL FORCES ARE TRANSMITTED BY DIAPHRAGM ACTON OF THE FLOORS TO SHEAR WALLS. LOADS ARE THEN TRANSFERRED TO THE FOOTINGS, WHERE ULTIMATE DISPLACEMENT IS RESISTED BYFc PASSIVE PRESSURE OF EARTH AND SLIDING FRICTION OF EARTH. OVERTURNING IS RESISTED BY THE DEAD LOAD U 1. WIND: EXPOSURE B ULTIMATE WIND SPEED, WLT = 110 M.P.H. (3 SECOND GUST). NOMINAL WIND SPEED, VASO = 85 M.P.H. IMPORTANCE FACTOR, Iw = 1.0 OTHER STRUCTURE PER ASCE 7, SECTION 29.5 RISK CATAGORY II INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT GCP1 = 3.18 2. SEISMIC: IMPORTANCE FACTOR, 10 = 1.0 RISK CATEGORY 11 MAPPED SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS, Ss = 1.479 AND 01 = 0.554 SOIL SIZE CLASS = E SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS. SDs = 0.888 AND 001 = 0,886 SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY = D SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT Cs = 0.296 STRENGTH RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR R = 3 EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE (ASCE 7, SECTION 15.4.1) 1.3 9106 DRAWS SUBMIT SUFFICIENT COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS TO ARCHITECT/ENGINEER FOR HE FOLLOWING: 1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS 2. REINFORCING STEEL (CONCRETE) 3' DO NOT FABRICATE PRIOR TO ARCHITECT'S/ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. ALL SHOP DRAWINGS SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER SHALL BEAR THE STAMPED APPPROVAL OF THE CONTRACTOR. SHOP DRAWING APPROVAL BY ANDERSON-PEYTON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SHALL NOT IMPLY THAT THE PROJECT MAY BE BUILT FROM THE SHOP HALLDRARE5, RATHER, THE PROJECT PLANS SHALL BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW SHOP DRAWINGS AND STAMP INDICATING 1815 PRIOR TO REVIEW BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. 20 S11E WORK 2.1 SOIL DATA (PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT #J1405375 DATED 8/9/13 PREPARED BY GEOTECH CONSULTANTS) FOR LOCATIONS SEE SOILS REPORT. SOIL BEARING ®CONT. SPREAD FOOTINGS = 2500 PST' AND S CATIONSBGRADE MODULUS OF 100 PCI. 10 CONCRETE 3.1 GENERAL NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ACI 301-02 ESTABLISH PROPORTIONS OF CEMENT, COARSE AND FINE AGGREGATES, WATER, A140 ADMIXTURES TO PRODUCE THE PROPERTIES SPECIFIED FOR EACH CONCRETE MIX HYPE PER ACI -301 ON THE BASIS OF PREVIOUS FIELD EXPERIENCE OR TRIAL BATCHES. USE ADMIXTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS. USE AMOUNTS OF WATER -REDUCING ADMIXTURE THAT WILL PERMIT PLACING WITHOUT SEGREGATION, HONEYCOMBING OR ROCK POCKETS. THE SLUMPS SPECIFIED ARE THE SLUMPS REQUIRED AT THE PONT OF PLACEMENT INTO THE STRUCTURE. USE INTERIOR MECHANICAL VIBRATORS WITH 7000 RPM MINIMUM FREQUENCY. DO NOT OVER -VIBRATE. DO NOT MOVE THE CONCRETE HORIZONTALLY USING THE VIBRATOR. 0014CRETE SHALL BE POURED MONOLITHICALLY BETWEEN CONSTRUCTOR OR CONTROL JOINTS. PROTECT ALL FRESHLY PLACED CONCRETE FROM PREMATURE DRYING AND EXCESSIVE HOT OR COLD TEMPERATURES FOR SEVEN DAYS AFTER POURING. PROVIDE ENGINEER WITH PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR CONTROL JOINT LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL, OR USE JOINTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ALL REINFORCEMENT TIE WRES AND FORM ANCHORS SHALL BE CUT OFF FLUSH WITH HE SURFACE; SURFACES WHERE EXPOSED SHALL BE SMOOTH AND FREE FROM IRREGULARITIES. 3,2 SIRaO1H DESIGN MIXES TO PROVIDE NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES APPLICATION STRENGTH MAXIMUM PERCENT F'c, (PSI) WA1ER/CEMENT AIR MATO ENTRAINMENT FOOTINGS 3000 0.50 5% SUBNOTES: - 1. ANY OF THE ABOVE MIXES CAN 8E USED FLOWABLE (8' TO 11" SLUMP) IF THE PROPER ADDITION OF ADMIXTURES IS INCLUDED AND THE W/C RATIO IS NOT INCREASED. 2. THE PROPORTIONS APPROVED SHALL BE CAREFULLY MAINTAINED. NO DEVIATION FROM THESE PROPORTIONS, ESPECIALLY THE ADDITION OF WATER, SHALL 8E MADE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 13 MATERIAL - OMIT WATER Q TES PER ACI 301 A.CEMENTfMMUSTCON OFF RM OIII ACE E 0.STM 150 TYPE I OR TYPE IL ENGINEER'S APPROVAL IS RUNHEATED B. WATER TO 8E CLEAN AND POTABLE. C. COARSE AND FINE AGGREGATES TO CONFORM TO ASTM -C33. 3.4 MATERIALS A. WATER REDUCING ADMIXTURES: CONCRETE USING POZZOLITH ADMIXTURES TO PRODUCE FLOWABLE CONCRETE MAY BE USED WITH THE ENGINEER'S APPROVAL AND MUST CONFORM TO ASTM -0494, POZZOUTH POLYHEED, POZZOLITH 10006, OR POZZUTECH 20. POZZOLITH SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO ALL CONCRETE IN EXACT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. ADMIXTURES AND DOSAGES WILL VARY DEPENDING ON CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND THE CONTRACTOR'S JOBSITE REQUIREMENTS. MAXIMUM SLUMP FOR SUCH CONCRETE NOT EXCEED 8" WITH A MINIMUM OF 10 OUNCES OF POLYHEED PER 100 OUNCES OF CEMENT. USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. B. AIR ENTRAINMENT: CONFORM TO ASIR-0260 AND ASTM -C494, MBVR OR MICRO -AIR BY MASTER BUILDER. ENTRAIN 5E +/- 1% AIR BY VOLUME IN ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE. C. OTHER ADMIXTURE: NO OTHER ADMIXTURES PERMITTED UNLESS PRIOR APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE ENGINEER. NO ADMIXTURES CONTAINING CHLORIDES ARE PERMITTED. ROHM= STEEL DETAIL, FABRICATE AND PLACE PER AO -315 AND ACI -318. SUPPORT REINFORCEMENT WITH APPROVED CHAIRS, SPACERS, OR TIES. SHALL BE NEW; 089100DEFORMED BILLET STEEL MEETING ASTM STANDARD A. STEEL REINFORCEIAENTBOUNDARY A-615, A-706 00 BOUNDARY ELEMENTS; GRADE 60 FOR L AND LARGER BARS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE MARKED ACCORDINGLY AND SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR RENEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION. GRADE 60 REBARS SHALL NOT BE BENT IN FIELD AFTER CONCRETE PLACEMENT. ALL BEND SHALL BE PER ACI, B. REINFORCEMENT IN ALL WALLS, SLABS, AND FOOTINGS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AROUND CORNERS OR CORNER BARS PROVIDED, BOTH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL C. LAPS: ALL TENSION SPLICES ARE ACCORDING TO ACI 318, CLASS B AND ALL COMPRESSION SPLICES ARE 30 DIAMETERS FOR Fc GREATER THAN 3000 PSI AND ARE 40 DIAMETERS FOR WHICH IS LESS THAN 3000 PSI, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE D. TRIM REINFORCING: AROUND ALL OPENINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 1-/5 TOP AND BOTTOM, EXTENDING 2'-6" BEYOND OPENING AT EACH CORNER. SEE TYPICAL DETAILS. E. WELDING TACK WELDING OF REBAR IS NOT PERMITTED UNLESS CALLED FOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. F. MINIMUM REINFORCING: WHERE REINFORCEMENT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, THE 'BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE'ACI 318 SHALL BE REFERRED TO FOR PROPER REINFORCEMENT ( ) . G. REBAR COVER: PROVIDE CONCRETE PROTECTION FOR REINFORCEMENT AS FOLLOWS: COVER CONDITION 2" BOTTOM FOOTING STEEL 2-1/2" TOP FOOTING STEEL H. WELDED WIRE FABRIC: ASTM -0185 AND ASTM -082 I. DEFORMED BAR ANCHORS: ASTM -0496 4.0 ALS MET 4.1 MEMO A. ALL WELDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS D1.1 "STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE" & D1.3 'STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE - SHEET STEEL" 8. ALL WELDING SHALL BE DONE BY AWS/WABO (WASHINGTON STATE ASSOCIATION OF BUILDING OFFICIALS CERTIFIED WELDERS. FOR ALL MOMENT FRAMES WELDERS SHALL HAVE ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATION SHOWING QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS 01.8, SECTION 5, WELDER QUALIFICATION, THE SUPPLEMENTAL WELDER QUALIFICATION FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS WELDING. C. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW AWS A2.4 SYMBOLS. WELDS SHOWN ON HE DRAWINGS ARE THE MINIMUM SIZES. INCREASE WELD SIZE TO AWS MINIMUM SIZES. BASED ON THICKNESS OF MEMBERS JOINED TOGETHER. D. ADDITIONAL FIELD WELDING MAY BE REQUIRED FROM THAT SHOWN ON THE DETAILS, ON THE JOINT CONFIGURATION, SPLICE LOCATIONS, ERECTION SEQUENCES, ETC. THE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ALL FIELD WELDS AND SUBMIT THEM FOR REVIEW. FIELD WELDING SHOULD BE MINIMIZED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. E. THE MINIMUM WELD SIZE USED SHALL BE 3/16" U.N.O. ON PLANS. ALL WELDS SHALL BE MADE USING LOW -HYDROGEN ELECTRODES WITH MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH = 70 KSI. LOW HYDROGEN SHAW ELECTRODES SHALL BE USED WITHIN FOUR HOURS OF OPENING THEIR HERMETICALLY SEALED CONTAINERS OR SHALL 8E REDRIED PER AWS D1.1, SECTION 4.5. ELECTRODES SHALL BE REDRIED NO MORE THAN ONE TIME. AND ELECTRODES THAT HAVE BEENWET BEEN WET SHALL NOT BE USED. F. WELDING PROCEDURES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER'S TESTING AGENCY FOR RENEW BEFORE STARTING FABRICATION OR ERECTION. ALL COMPLETE -PENETRATION WELDS SHALL BE ULTRASONICALLY TESTED UPON COMPLETION OF THE CONNECTION EXCEPT PLATE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1/4" THICK SHALL BE MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTED. REDUCTION IN TESTING MAY BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING CINE WITH APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. G. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE JOINT PREPARATIONS AND WELDING PROCEDURES THAT SHALL 0 R ARE NOT UNITED T0: REWIRED ROOT OPENINGS; ROOT FACE DIMENSIONS; GROVE ANGLES; BACKING BARS; COPES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS VALUES; AND TAPERS OF UNEQUAL PARTS. H. NO WELDING OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE ALLOWED EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 10 STRUCTURAL STEEL A. ALL DETAILING, FABRICATION, AND ERECTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE A1SC 'MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION." STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING, 0NO: CHANNELS. EMBEDMENT$ ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi OR IN CONCRETE AND MISC. STEEL TYPES LISTED UNDER METALS, 0NO "ALL STEEL" NELSON WELDED HEAD STUD ASTM 9108, Fy = 51 ksi B. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AISC SPECIFICATION. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING FABRICATOR. ALL STEEL ANCHORS AND TES AND OTHER MEMBERS EMBEDDED IN 00440901E OR MASONRY SHALL BE LEFT UNPAINTED. DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCE FOR BUILD-UP MEMBERS SHALL BE PER AWS 01.1. GENERAL NOTES FOR STEEL CONNECTORS SHALL APPLY TO ALL STEEL CONNECTIONS, LINO. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ERECTION AIDS THAT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED T0: ERECTION ANGLES; UFT HOLES, AND OTHER AIDS. D. METAL PROTECTION - ALL MISCELLANEOUS STEEL AND HARDWARE EXPOSED TO VIEW OR IN PORTON OF BUILDING SHALL 8E GALVANIZED PER ASTM A-123 WITH 1.25 OZ. OF ZINC SPELTER PER SQUARE FOOT OF SURFACE AREA. ALL OTHER STEEL SURFACES TO BE SHOP PAINTED AFTER FABRICATION.• 8,0 $PEOAL OIWEC110N5: SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 1704 OF THE 2009 18C AND ARE REWIRED DURING THE FOLLOWING: A. THE TAKING OF CONCRETE TEST SPECIMENS B. THE PLACEMENT OF REINFORCING STEEL, TENDONS, AND PRESTRESSED STEEL OF ALL FOOTINGS, COLUMNS, WALLS, SLABS AND APPENDAGES. C. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE A SCHEDULE OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND 91AU. SUBMIT THIS SCHEDULE TO THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. D. INSPECTION IS INSPECTION PERFORMED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AT VARIOUS STAGES OF A PROJECT AS OUTLINED IN IBC SECTION 109 TO ENSURE COMPUANCE TO THE BUILDING CODE. E. SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE DONE BY THE OWNER'S INSPECTOR WHERE IBC CHAPTER 17 (REF SECTION 1704) REQUIRES SPECIAL EXPERTISE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. F. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AS DEFINED M IBC SECTION 1702. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION GOES NOT INCLUDE OR WAIVE THE 9E5PON5181141Y FOR INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY IBC SECTORS 109 OR 1704. WSC8IANEOIIS VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. PROVIDE ERECTION BRACING AS NECESSARY UNTI1 PERMANENT SUPPORT AND STIFFNESS ARE INSTALLED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR WALL OPENING, ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SIZE AND LOCATOR OF ALL OPENINGS FOR DUCTS, PIPES, CONDUITS, ETC., NOT 590111. • AB. ANCHOR BOLT LD. INSIDE DIAMETER AGGR. AGGREGATE INSUL INSULA1106 ALT. ALTERNATE INT. INTERIOR APPROX. APPROXIMATE ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL Mt JOINT JST. DOST 8D. 40AR0 BLDG. BUILDING RFA Loan FROM ABOVE BLK BLOCKING BUMLIXTRIxG NAx. MAXIMUM Bu. BEAM MFR. MANUFACTURER 801. 8BOTTOM01960 Mel. MINIMUM B1WN. BETWEEN MISC. MISCELLANEOUS M.O. MASONRY OPENING O.J. CONTROL JOINT MIL METAL CLEAR C.M.U. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT x0. NUMBER WL. COLUMN 44.1.1 NOT TO SCALE CONC. CONCRETE CONN. CONNECTION O.C. ON CENTER 00441,CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER CONT. CONTINUOUS 011. OVERHEAD OPO OPENING DEG. DEGREE DPP. OPPOSITE DET./DT. DETAIL 01AG DIAGONAL PCT. PRE -CAST DM. 0 DIAMETER P19 PROPERTY UNE DWG DONS PEND. PLYWOOD DNC. DRAWING R.D. ROO DRAW 08. 04,08EXISTING RE: REFER TO ... V. EACH REINF. REINFORCED EXPANSION JOST REOb. REO RED 01. 01. 0.5 EXTERIOR INSULATION AND Ru ROOM ELEV. RV. ELEVATIOSH N R.O. MGR OPENING E0. EQUAL SCHED. SCHEDULE EQUIP. EQUIPMENT SECT. SECTOR E.W. EACH WAYSQUARE FOOT EXP. EXPANSION SHl5.f. . SHEET EXT. EXTERIOR S9W OR S.W. SHEA8WALL SRA 084080 F.D. FLOOR DRAIN SPEC. SPECIFICATION FON. FOUNDATION SQ. OR rIJ SQUARE F.F. FF FINISH MOOR STACG. STAINLESS STEEL FISH FRAME 55. STACGEREO FIN. FINISH STD. STANDARD FIR. FLOOR STIFF STIFFENER 4140. FOUNDATION 011. STEEL F.D.B. FACE O' BRICK SmUC. STRUCTURAL FOC FACE OF CONCRETE FS. FULL StE 1R TREAD FT. FOOT OR FEET 1 & B TOP AND BOTTOM FTC. FURRING 1 & 0 TONGUE & GROOVE NRR. FURRING THK. TRICK 1 OF 08, GAUGE 706. TW1081 5818. GALVANIZEDCR, 06400 GUY. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE GYP' GY65UN GYP. 8p. CYPSIM BOARD VER 5VENN 0910 VERT. VERTICAL HT. HEIGHT HVAC HEATING. 101LATION AND W/ WIN AIR CONDIMINING W/0 WITHOUT 4 CENIERUNE R PLATE No. RECEIVE!' ED SEP 16 2013 1 013 SEP 0 2 PUBLIC WORKS DL JLLU►'MU'I C S I-1 E E T INDEX SHEET SHEET CONTENTS REVISION 81.0 STRUCTURAL NOTES 52.0 TANK PLANS AND DETAILS TOTAL NUMBER OF SHEETS 2 • LATEST INDIVIDUAL SHEET REVISION ISSUED H�- µu'; D H P �I' Engineering Building Design Consultants 25964 12901 PLACE SE KENT. WASHINGTON 98030 (253) 220-0848 q) R BR9S4F9 'P0 ppQ26194. _194.4, XONAL B� QOM 9.3-13 PREPARED FOR: BAKER COMMODITIES STORAGE TANKS 5795 S. 130TH PL SEATTLE, WA 98178 REVISIONS TO THIS SHEET: No. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 9.0.13 SUBMITTAL TO CITY DESIGNED BY BIRB DRAWN BY DLW LATEST ISSUE 9-3-13 PROJECT # 13.054 SHEET TITLE : STRUCTURAL NOTES SUBMITTAL SET ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THESE DRAWINGS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISIONS PENDING LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL 800000. 51.0 SPECIAL N0TE5: 1. SCOPE OF DHP ENGINEERING'S WORK DOES NOT INCLUDE THE DESIGN OF TANKS 70 SUPPORT THEIR OWN CONTENTS. 2. UPON INITIAL LOADING OF TANKS CONTENT LEVELS SHALL BE MONITORED AS INDICATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR EOUAL DISTRIBUTION OF LOAD IN ORDER TO LIMIT DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENTS. 3. FOUNDATION HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO SUPPORT EACH TANK WITH CONTINUOUS, EVENLY DISTRIBUTED LOAD FROM ITS CONTENTS TO THE 80TTOM OF THE TANK TO THE EMBEDDED PLATES AROUND ITS PERIMETER. 4. CONHRMATON THAT TANKS ARE MADE OF A MINIMUM OF A36 STEEL SHALL BE GIVEN TO DHP ENGINEERING PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 5. LOADINGS IN EXCESS OF THOSE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS HAVE NOT BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR. 6. CONFIRM ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS PR10R TO FABRICATION OF MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND IN THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FROM THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO DHP ENGINEERING FOR REVISION. EXISTING TANK & SLAB 3 -1/4 - (FIELD DIM -TANK MFR TO VERIFY) '4 1/2x4x2'-0" W/ (2) 7/8"9x12" A.B.'s 0 16" GA, (18) LOCATIONS EMBED PLATE 'ASTERISK INDICATES THOSE ARE DIMENSIONS PER BAKER COMMODITIES FIELD MEASUREMENTS VIEW A -A TANK WALL (BY OTHERS) 5/8" (FIELD DIM) PLATEBY OTHERS, WELDED 7111 70 THE TANK WALL (; `\12' DIA. TANK - PLAN GALE: 1/4"=1'-0" •39'-6" TANK EDGE 3/16 F12" MIN 1/2 4"x2-0" W/ (2) 7/8"0x12" NELSON WHS 0 16" GA, (18) LOCATIONS AROUND PERIMETER EOUALLY SPACED. •11 tf 3/8" OR 1/4" THICK TANK WALL (BY OTHERS) ADDT'L STEEL CHANNELS & PLATE (BY TANK MFR) (2)-/4x4'-0" 0 EA EMBED MEMMitiiimilIZM 2 UR 2 cuz1/2 24' DEEP FOOTING CIO NV . o DATE NATIVE COMPACTED EX 51140 4"— SOILS S.O.G. TANK ATTACHMENT & EMBED PLATE SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" •19'-6" (N) 12' DIA x26' TALL TANK. MAX WT = 182.6k f6 0 12" 0.C. T&8 FULL LENGTH OF SLAB i 4'-5" MIN. (N) 12' DIA x26' TALL TANK. MAX NT = 182.6k 1 /6012"O.C. T&B FULL LENGTH OF SLAB 17'-0" /—EDGE OF (E) 2'-0" THICK SLAB 7!17/1/,tel ( INSTALL ST1 R's PER 1/52.0 & 2/52.0 EDGE OF NE MAT FON (E) SUMP PIT (0) GREASE CONTAINER —\.... "(E) 11"W1DE CONC WALL FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 1/4-=1'-0" -z 2.1 5 J -J 06 ,DHP Engineering Building Design Consultants 25964 129th PLACE SE KENT, WASHINGTON 98030 (253) 220-0848 ; .R. BR4s4, a AO 26391 'ONiTj0�2 'rAL k MIK 9-3-13 PREPARED FOR: BAKER COMMODITIES STORAGE TANKS 5795 S. 130TH PL SEATTLE, WA 98178 REVISIONS TO THIS SHEET: No. DATE DESCRIPITON 1 9313 SUBMFRAL TOCFFV DESIGNED BY BIRB DRAWN BY DLW LATEST ISSUE 9-3-13 PROJECT # 13.054 SHEET TITLE TANK PLANS AND DETAILS SUBMITTAL SET ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THESE DRAWINGS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISIONS PENDING LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW. S2.0 Controlled Environments The information disclosed herein was originated y and is the property o Controlled En:uon- menls Can true ion,lnc. and ex- cept la ri his expressly gran- ted to the customer, Contro- lled Enviro men s Construction. Inc. resery 5 of potent, proprie- tary, desg , use sale, mono - !actor; 9 a 0 reproduction rights thereto. 1 APPROX. LOCATION OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN EL= 17.5' FROM EXISTING A.L.T.A SURVEY WZ H 0 w Z eLolQ Q w mw Z DRAWN BY: MAC ��L 1LLvi1ViL14f DATE: 09/03/2013 SCALE: 1"= 40'-0" JOB NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER:: SITE PLAN for Science and Industry ----