HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-04 Regular MinutesTUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
June 4, 1984 Tukwila City Hall
Council Chambers
7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
and
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
OFFICIALS
REPORTS
Mayor
Councilman Duffie
Absence
Report on Highline
Incorporation
Mayor's Letter to
Metro
Regular Meeting
M I N U T E S
Mayor Van Dusen called the Regular Meeting of the Tukwila
City Council to order and led the audience in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
LIONEL C. BOHRER, MABEL J. HARRIS, DORIS E. PHELPS, Council
President; JOE H. DUFFIE, EDGAR D. BAUCH, WENDY A. MORGAN,
CHARLES E. SIMPSON.
LARRY MARTIN, City Attorney; MAXINE ANDERSON, City Clerk;
BRAD COLLINS, Planning Director; DENNIS HIDELL, Council
Analyst; DON MORRISON, City Administrator.
Mayor Van Dusen reported that the Valley Communications Board
and the Director have studied the possibility of expanding
the facility. The consultant's report recommends a cost of
$771,000 for the facility. Discussion on this will come
before Council, hopefully, at the next Committee of the
Whole.
Councilman Bauch said he would like to see a projection of
the number of calls for Tukwila and how they have grown. The
resident population hasn't grown.
Councilman Duffie reported that he will be out of town for
the next two weeks on military leave.
Don Morrison reported that he spoke with the City Manager of
Des Moines concerning the proposed Highline Incorporation.
They contacted the Highline Incorporation Committee and met
with them. The Committee seemed amenable to meeting with
their City Council to negotiate some sort of agreement
seeking a stipulated judgment in the Court to revise the
boundary. It was suggested that the City of Tukwila do the
same thing. This will be discussed further under Item 7a.
Mayor Van Dusen reported on the letter he wrote Mr. Paul
Barden, County Councilman, concerning the proposed Tukwila
Transit Center. He states that the Metro Capital Facilities
Subcommittee meeting minutes contain a number of misconcep-
tions regarding Tukwila's position on siting of this faci-
lity. He suggested that a meeting be set to develop a policy
framework for the direction of further siting studies.
Councilman Bauch noted that the City worked hard to develop a
Comprehensive Plan and worked six or seven months before
approving the zoning ordinance. Now Metro is saying that
Tukwila hasn't decided what the land use will be.
Council President Phelps said she met with the Metro staff
members to discuss some of the issues before proceeding with
the work program. She said she asked to have agendas of the
Capital Facilities Subcommittee sent to Mr. Collins from now
on to try to prevent any further misunderstandings.
Council President Phelps said the question was raised as far
as assurance by Metro for transit service. The City's con-
sultant on the Urban Form Study commented that if the City
eliminates the kind of free parking in the areas of Tukwila s
they have now, we may find that our businesses are moving
elsewhere.
x- 111 0
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING
June 4, 1984
Page 2
REPORTS Cont.
Mayor's Letter to
CITIZEN'S COMMENTS
Marilyn Steiger
concerning utility
poles along Macadam
Road South
CONSENT AGENDA
Resolution #915
Budget Transfer
Motion #84 -06
Councilman Bohrer said the concern is that we expected a
straight up study of where the site should be, with all of
the advantages and disadvantages investigated to make the
site recommendation. The thing Tukwila has that should be of
primary interest to Metro is workers who come to the City and
people who come here on business. The more we attract, the
more there will be a requirement for transit services. Our
interests are the same as Metro, but the way we state them
may be a little different. The decision on whether people
are going to ride transit to Tukwila is not based on how busy
the City streets are, but how congested the freeway is
leading to Tukwila. This is the most efficient location for
a Transit Center.
Marilyn Steiger, President of the Southcenter View
Condominiums Board of Directors, presented Council with a
letter concerning utilities poles along Macadam Road. She
presented Council with a letter on February 27, 1984, pro-
testing the installation of unsightly utility poles along
Macadam Road South and was advised that a temporary permit
(90 days) was issued for Pacific Northwest Bell to retrofit
underground cables. The poles were to be removed by June 1.
She said she shared this information with other irate resi-
dents of the condominium. Today the poles are still standing
so she called City Hall and was advised that the Board of
Adjustment had issued an extension to the permit until
December 30, 1984. She commented that, perhaps, com-
munication between the City and affected parties would have
lessened their anger. She asked if the Board of Adjustment
was aware of their previous protest. She requested that the
Mayor direct the Board to review their decision to extend the
permit and instruct Pacific Northwest Bell to complete their
work and remove the temporary poles no later than June 30,
1984. She has made two other attempts at gaining information
from the City with no response to either.
Mayor Van Dusen assured her that he would review her inquiry
and get back to her.
a
b.
Approval of Minutes:
Approval of Vouchers
Claims Fund Vouchers
Current Fund
Golf Crse. Spec. Fund
Street Fund
Arterial Street
Federal Shared Revenue
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Firemen's Pension
Equipment Rental
L.I.D.
May 21, 1984
#17840 #18017
44,945.99
4,209.98
83,623.68
2,965.18
3,153.88
928.20
8,586.71
512.70
33,461.52
731.00
$183,118.84
c. A resolution of the City of Tukwla, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor to sign contracts with Renton Area
Youth Services and Highline Youth Service Bureau.
d. Budget Transfer Motion No. (84 -06) to purchase a Kroy
Lettering System for use by all City Departments.
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA
BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED.
l 1
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING
June 4, 1984
Page 3
OLD BUSINESS
Highline Incorporation Reference was made to a previous report made by Mr. Morrison
on the filing of an injunction in the Highline Incorporation
Case.
NEW BUSINESS
Resolution #916
Regarding the County
Gen. Dev. Guide and
implement. measures
Formal Motion #84-01
Establishing a joint
Mayor- Council policy
regarding legislative
staff positions
MISCELLANEOUS
Council Member
Morgan
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY SIMPSON THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SEEK AN INJUNCTION IN THE COURT OF
APPEALS ON THE HIGHLINE INCORPORATION LAWSUIT BASED ON THE
TWO GROUNDS MENTIONED IN THE LETTER DATED MAY 23, 1984, FROM
ATTORNEY C. CARLSON AND ALSO, TO ATTEMPT TO NEGOTIATE A
STIPULATED AGREEMENT WITH THE PARTIES INVOLVED. MOTION
CARRIED.
Excerpt from Mr. Carlson's letter: "We have two grounds for
seeking an injunction against this election. There is a
technical argument that the King County Council has violated
RCW 35.03.030 by failing to hold the incorporation election
within 90 days after approval of the Boundary Review Board
decision. Secondly, we could ask that this election be post-
poned until the Court of Appeal's determination on the
merits, based on arguments of efficiency and economy."
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE PROPOSED
RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED.
Attorney Martin read a resolution of the City of Tukwila,
Washington, regarding the County General Development Guide
and implementation measures.
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 916
BE ADOPTED AS READ. MOTION CARRIED.
Brad Collins, Planning Director, urged the representatives
from Tukwila who attend the Suburban Cities Meeting to
strongly support the similar resolution regarding the General
Development Guide and service and impact areas.
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY SIMPSON, THAT THE FORMAL MOTION
BE ADOPTED.*
Councilman Bohrer raised the question if the Council
Legislative Coordinator and Council Secretary positions
should be hired under a signed contract. If Council finds
the employees ineffective, there could be a problem.
Attorney Martin said the best action would be to draft a
provision that anyone hired to fill these spots would sign an
employment contract which clarifies that they are serving at
the pleasure of the City Council and that they agree to waive
any other right that might be provided other employees. He
offered to draft a contract.
MOVED BY PHELPS, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT SECTION 1 OF THE
FORMAL MOTION BE AMENDED TO STRIKE THE WORD "REGULAR" FROM
THE SECOND SENTENCE AND ADD, AFTER THE WORD CLASSIFICATION,
"SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF ANY PRE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT."
MOTION CARRIED.
*MOTION CARRIED AS AMENDED.
Council Member Morgan commented that as a result of her work
at King County she has occasion to recognize that there is an
increase in violence against women. With the recent murders
and brutal beatings women seem to be the target for extremely
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING
June 4, 1984
Page 4
MISCELLANEOUS Cont.
Council Member
ADJOURNMENT
8:17 P.M.
brutal violence. What is our society doing that encourages
this type of thing. This is a terribly sad situation for all
of us. A recently beaten woman asked if you would visit a
country where 1 out of 4 girls will be sexually molested
before age 19; 1 out of 10 boys will be sexually molested
before age 19; and 1 out of every 2 women will be in a
violent or an abusive relationship at sometime in their life?
This is a terrible reminder that we live in violent times.
MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY SIMPSON, THAT THE REGULAR
MEETING OF THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL !1 OURN. MOTION CARRIED.
7 f ib?/
y
al �us�n
M.; or an
City Clerk
June 4, 1984, Council Meeting
Verbatim Transcript (Partial)
Tukwila Transit Center
Mayor Van Dusen reported on the letter he wrote Mr. Paul Barden, County
Councilman, concerning the proposed Tukwila Transit Center. He states
that the METRO Capital Facilities Subcommittee Meeting minutes contain a
number of misconceptions regarding Tukwila's position on siting of this
facility. He suggests that a meeting be set to develop a policy framework
for the direction of further siting studies.
Councilman Bauch noted that the City worked hard to develop a Comprehensive
Plan and worked six or seven months, therefore approving the Zoning Ordinance.
Now, METRO is saying that Tukwila hasn't decided what the land use will be.
Councilmember Harris said she read the minutes of the Subcommittee meeting and
feels that the Metro Committee was given bad facts on which to make a judgment.
Maybe the Staff misunderstood. We owe the Subcommittee the actual facts.
Council President Phelps said she met with the Metro Staff members to discuss
some of the issues before proceeding with the work program. She said she
asked to have agendas of the Capital Facilities Subcommittee sent to Mr. Collins
from now on to try to prevent any further misunderstandings. She said she
challenged Ellen on her comments after the formal meeting was over because
she stated that the only reason Tukwila wanted the south end location in there
was to justify future development for the City. Of course, the Metro Subcommittee
said that was none of their business. They can't site a Transit Center just
to justify Tukwila's land use plan.
Jan Weisner, Chamber of Commerce, said that Bellevue passed regulations to
limit the parking space around the buildings so as to force people to go by
transit rather than by car. (Jan spoke from the back of the room making it
difficult to pick up what she was saying.)
Councilmember Harris said that when they are asking us to chop back on the
number of parking stalls needed, when the City was doing the plan, Ed and she
were on a Ride Share Committee. She asked Mr. Neil Peterson if they could
assure us if we cut back on the number of parking stalls would METRO assure
us that they would then give us the number of buses that were needed to
make up the slack and he said no, there was no way they could assure us of
that. The best way to go would be to try ride sharing. We did pass a very
aggressive Ride Share Program at that time, but it would not have been the
thing for us. I didn't even bring it back to Cniincil, I just mentioned it a
couple of times. Now, they are saying we should have done this or we should
have changed ourparki.ng.requirements. I went to bat for it, and was told
no, it wouldn't happen.
Council President Phelps said the same question was posed again today as far
as assurances by Metro for the Transit Service. Should we make the changes
in land use plans that we have in the City and they were not forthcoming.
The City's consultant on the Urban Form Study made a very appropriate comment
-if we eliminate the kind of free parking in the area that Tukwila has, which
is a different kind of area than downtown Seattle, the north end of Seattle or
Bellevue, that our business just may decide to go to Redmond or Lynnwood. That
move would not.necessarily guarantee the density that they wanted. Zoning and
Land Use decisions do not lead development, economics and the market do.
June 4, 1984, Council Meeting
Verbatim Transcript (Partial
Tukwila Transit Center
Page 2
Councilman Bohrer said the concern is that we expected a straight -up study of
where the site should be, with all of the advantages and all the disadvantages
to the City that METRO investigated and considered in making the site
recommendation. They don't even have to follow it. One of the questions
asked of the Subcommittee was what it the City of Tukwila willing to do for
METRO to make the Transit Center viable here. His answer is many things, but
basically it is rezoning to provide potential for further growth and to conduct
other studies that will allow further growth beyond that. The thing Tukwila
has that should be of primary interest to METRO is workers who come to the City
and people who come to the City on business. The more of these we attract,
the more there will be a requirement for Transit Services. The projections
we are dealing with were not based on having a Transit Center. They were
based on the actions Tukwila has already taken, and, for that reason, the
area is of interest to Metro. I think it is incumbent upon Metro to prove
to the City of Tukwila that any "concessions that Tukwila should make to make
Transit more viable will be a benefit to the City." This is the approach the
City has already taken. Howare they going to improve_the business climate
in the City of Tukwila by siting the Transit Center here? Our interests are
the same as METRO's, but the way we state them may be a little different.
They.want.riders, we want growth. The two are complementary. The decision on
whether people are going to ride transit to Tukwila is not based on how busy
the City streets are and the congestion here, but rather it is going to be
strongly based on the question of where is the congestion elsewhere on the
freeways that lead to Tukwila. These are the issues. Tukwila is a very
different place. The City is only going to be satisfied when we see that
straight -up study that looks at all the factors and looks at all the sites,
and, based on that, says which is the best site for Tukwila. Tukwila has
to be the appropriate site for all the reasons Tukwila is freeway access.
This is the most efficient location for a Transit Center.
MA: pt