HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIN 2021-05-10 Item 1B - Discussion - Marijuana Tax RevenueCity of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Finance and Governance Committee
FROM: Laurel Humphrey, Legislative Analyst
DATE: April 30, 2021
SUBJECT: Marijuana Retail Tax Revenue
ISSUE
The City Council requested staff provide an update on revenue potential should zoning be expanded
to allow marijuana retailers in more areas of Tukwila.
BACKGROUND
Initiative 502 passed in November 2012 and created a comprehensive regulatory approach on
marijuana with state -licensed producers, processors and retailers. Through the rulemaking process
the Liquor and Cannabis Board adopted regulations on the number of retail store licenses for
jurisdictions, determining a maximum of 2 for Tukwila. Currently, a license is issued to Mount Baker
Retail Partnership, LLC (12539 E Marginal way S) and a license is pending for Dash & Wrigley, LLC
(13003 Tukwila International Boulevard).
On September 3, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2407 to implement Initiative 502. In
Tukwila, marijuana retailers, producers and processors are permitted uses in Tukwila Valley South
and Heavy Industrial Zones, subject to the 1,000 -foot exclusion rule. In 2015, 2SSB 5052 and HB 2136
allowed cities to reduce buffers from 1000 to 100 feet around all entities except elementary and
secondary schools and public playgrounds. In 2017, the City Council received two separate requests to
expand permitted marijuana retail zones but denied both on February 13, 2017.
In 2019, the Finance Committee discussed marijuana revenue and zoning considerations and decided
against recommending any changes to the City Council at that time.
DISCUSSION
The state marijuana excise tax and its distributions has changed over time and can be altered in any
future legislative session. The State currently taxes marijuana through a single excise tax of 37% at the
time of retail sale, in addition to the regular state and local sales tax, and $30M of that revenue is
shared with cities, towns and counties. There are two components to the distributions: 1) per capita
share to all jurisdictions that allow the siting of producers, processors and retailers; 2) retail share to
all jurisdictions where licensed retailers are physically located and in proportion to total statewide
retail sales. Tukwila does not have any marijuana businesses and therefore does not receive sales -
based revenue. Tukwila's per capita excise tax distribution has been:
Year*
Revenues
2021 (to date)
6,018.67
2020
23,951.38
2019
23,016.77
2018
30,275.81
2017
4,697.34
`City Fiscal Year Jan 1 - Dec 3
41
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
It is difficult to estimate what Tukwila would receive for its retail share if the two state -issued licenses
were active businesses. The formula depends not only on population but also on marijuana retail
sales as a proportion of total retail sales, as well as the number/total population of cities and counties
that prohibit marijuana. MRSC used to offer an estimate calculator but discontinued it due to
complexity of the formula.
While the revenue is difficult to predict, we can look to neighboring jurisdictions for insight, while
recognizing that their larger residential populations result in greater shares than Tukwila would
receive in similar circumstances. The chart below shows the 2020 marijuana excise revenue for
neighboring cities where marijuana retailers are currently open:
City (number of locations)
Population
2020 Marijuana Excise Revenue*
Burien (2)
51,477
$111,115
Auburn (3)
80,134
$178,918
Des Moines (1)
31,734
$76,657
Renton (4)
101,484
$207,866
*State Fiscal Year: July 1 - June 30
RECOMMENDATION
Discussion only.
ATTACHMENTS
Marijuana Excise Tax Excerpt from 11/20 MRSC Revenue Guide for Washington Cities & Towns
42
MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX
Quick Summary
• A portion of the state's marijuana excise tax is distributed to cities and counties depending on their
marijuana policies.
• Two separate components:
Per capita share distributed to all cities and counties that do not prohibit marijuana businesses.
Retail share distributed to cities and counties where marijuana retailers are located, in propor-
tion to statewide marijuana revenues.
• No clear guidance on use of revenues, but stated intent of 1-502 is that marijuana legalization will
"[allow] law enforcement resources to be focused on violent and property crimes [and generate] new
state and local tax revenue for education, health care, research, and substance abuse prevention."
RCW: 69.50.540(2)(g)
Initiative 502 (1-502), which was approved by voters in 2012, legalized recreational marijuana and authorized
marijuana excise taxes. Marijuana excise taxes are imposed and collected by the State of Washington; as of
2018, the state imposes a 37% marijuana excise tax on the retail sale of marijuana, marijuana concentrates, and
marijuana -infused products (RCW 69.50.535 and WAC 314-55-089).
Cities and counties may not impose additional local excise taxes upon the sale of marijuana. However, the
state shares some of the excise tax revenues with cities and counties, as mandated by I-502.60 The actual
revenues received by cities depend on legislative appropriations from the state budget. The state legislature
has previously attempted to reduce local marijuana excise tax distributions, and like all shared revenues these
distributions could be changed in future legislative sessions.
Marijuana excise tax distributions depend in significant part upon local marijuana policies and regulations. The
regulatory approach that each city adopts, as well as the number of local marijuana retailers, will determine
whether the city receives any marijuana excise tax revenue (and how much).
Eligibility and Distribution Formula
There are two separate components to marijuana excise tax distributions:
• Per capita share: Distributed on a strictly per capita (population) basis to all cities, towns, and counties that
allow the siting of marijuana producers, processors, AND retailers. Any jurisdiction that prohibits marijuana
producers, processors, OR retailers is not eligible.
• Retail share: Distributed to all cities, towns, and counties where licensed marijuana retailers are physically
located, and in proportional share to total statewide marijuana retail sales.
The different distribution formulas mean that some jurisdictions will receive both the per capita and retail
distributions, while others may receive only one or the other, and some jurisdictions will receive neither. The
chart below shows a few hypothetical scenarios to illustrate the differences.
60 The intent of 1-502 states, among other things, that it will "[generate] new state and local tax revenue" [emphasis
added], although it does not specify how the revenue will be shared with local governments or how much will be shared.
Table of Contents
Revenue Guide for Washington Cities and Towns 1 NOVEMBER 2020
133 43
Hypothetical Marijuana Excise Tax Distribution Scenarios
City allows marijuana production, processing, and retail and has at
least one retailer located within the jurisdiction.
City prohibits marijuana entirely and has no retailers located within
the jurisdiction.
Town took no action to prohibit marijuana, but is small enough that
no marijuana businesses can locate there under state law due to the
buffer requirements.
City prohibits marijuana producers and processors but allows
retailers and has at least one retailer located within the jurisdiction.
City currently prohibits new marijuana businesses but has existing
retailers that are grandfathered in.
City prohibits marijuana retail and has no retailers but allows
marijuana production and processing.
Eligible for per
capita share?
Yes
Eligible for
retail share?
Yes
No No
Yes
No
No Yes
No
Yes
No No
Each year by September 15, the LCB must provide the state treasurer with the annual distribution amount for
each county and city. For the most recent legislative appropriations and distribution estimates, refer to our
annual Budget Suggestions publication, released every year at the end of July.
Use of Revenues
The restrictions on the use of marijuana excise tax revenues are somewhat murky, as there is no clear statute
stating how the funds must be used. However, the notes in RCW 69.50.540 reference RCW 69.50.101 and the
stated intent of 1-502, which states that marijuana legalization will "[allow] law enforcement resources to be
focused on violent and property crimes [and generate] new state and local tax revenue for education, health
care, research, and substance abuse prevention."
Timing of Receipts
Payments are distributed quarterly on the last business day of March, June, September, and December. The
State Treasurer's Office distributes both the "per capita" and "retail" shares together in one payment using the
same BARS code.
Table of Contents
44 Revenue Guide for Washington Cities and Towns 1 NOVEMBER 2020
134