The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit PL13-018 - GOLDEN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT - BUFFALO WILD WINGS DESIGN REVIEWBUFFALO WILD WINGS 225 TUKWILA PKWY PL13-018 L13-018 DESIGN REVIEW E13-006 SEPA DESIGN REVIEW 1 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NOTICE OF DECISION DATED MAY 1, 2012 To: Jared Taylor Wayne Johnson Golden Property Development Westfield 10 S. Grant Street 2800 Southcenter Roseville, CA 95678 Tukwila, WA 98188 Jack Pace, Director King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. Project Information Project File Number: L13-018 Public Hearing Design Review Applicant: Jared Taylor, Golden Property Development Type of Permit Applied for: Type 4 approval for design review Project Description: Design Review approval for a new 8,451 square foot building including a 1,365 square foot enclosed patio to be built on the pre-existing foundation. Site improvements, landscaping and parking will not change. Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Designation: II. Decision 225 Tukwila Parkway, parcel # 9202470100 A SEPA Addendum to the EIS was added to the file on June 5, 2013 Tukwila Urban Center SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has determined that the project, required an addenemdum to the EIS issued in 2004. Probably impacts under the original EIS and addendum are included in the EIS file. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Board of Architectural Review has determined that the application for Design Review does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings SM Page 1 of 3 07/30/2013 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 DR NOD.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 and conclusions contained in the staff report, subject to the following conditions: 1. Trellis and planters are included on the south and east sides need to be added to the site development plans and reviewed for approval. The proposed vine, Clematis fasciculiflora will need to be ordered well in advance of installation to ensure it is available to plant in time for to the Planning final. Conditions of approval that will be added to the future Building Permit: 1. Irrigation is required in the planters. 2. No changes to the Design Review approved plans and conditions will be allowed without prior approval of the Planning Department, these include changes to the exterior finishes of the building, landscaping (both design and plant species), site plan, and site finishes. If you wish to make any changes you must submit a written request along with a justification for the requested change and an explanation as to why the issue was not addressed as part of the design review process. 3. All design elements on the building and the site, including landscaping must be completed prior to final occupancy. The city will not allow the design elements to be deferred; all items must be completed before final inspection. It is highly unlikely that the city will consider financial guarantee in lieu of completing the work. 4. An inspection to approve the exterior finishes (materials and colors) is required before doing any exterior finish work, to ensure that the finishes approved as part of the design review process are being used. 5. Prior to requesting a landscaping inspection the applicant shall provide an affidavit from the landscape architect, stating that the landscaping was installed per approved plans. As part of the landscaping inspection you will need to verify that the irrigation system is working properly. III. Your Appeal Rights The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Board of Architectural Review Decision is permitted. IV. Procedures and Time for Appealing In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review] decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is, by August 15, 2013. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: SM Page 2 of 3 07/30/2013 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 DR NOD.doc 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. Appeal Hearings Process The Hearing Examiner appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. Inspection of Information on the Application Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Stacy MacGregor, wJio may be contacted at 206-433-7166 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. tacy MacGre Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila cc: PL13-018 SM Page 3 of 3 07/30/2013 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 DR NOD.doc 1 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Jim Haggerton, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PREPARED July 17, 2013 HEARING DATE: July 25, 2013 FILE NUMBER: PW13-018, E13-006, L13-018 APPLICANT: Jared Taylor, Golden Property Development OWNER: Westfield Property Tax Department Jack Pace, Director REQUEST: Design Review approval for a new 8,451 square foot building including a 1,365 square foot enclosed patio to be built on the pre-existing foundation. Site improvements, landscaping and parking will not change. LOCATION: 225 Tukwila Parkway, parcel # 9202470100 NOTIFICATION: Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing for this Type 4 permit was mailed to surrounding property owners, interested parties, affected agencies and posted on the site on May 16, 2013. Notice of Public Hearing was also published in the Seattle Times on July 11, 2013. ZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Tukwila Urban Center SEPA DETERMINATION: A SEPA Addendum to the EIS was added to the file on June 5, 2013. DECISION: Approval with Conditions STAFF: Stacy MacGregor ATTACHMENTS: A. Applicant's response to Design Review Criteria B. Site Plans, sheet DR -01 C. Colored Elevations, sheet DR -02 D. Site Improvement Plan, sheet DR -03 E. Existing Landscape Plan, sheet DR -04 SM Page 1 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 FINDINGS VICINITY INFORMATION The proposal site is bounded on the north by Tukwila Parkway and on the east by Andover Park West. The parcel is in the northeast corner of the Westfield Southcenter Mall campus and is at the location of what was formerly the Bank of America. The building and parcel are surrounded by parking for the Mall. In addition to the Mall building, the campus includes three existing freestanding restaurants, two banks, a financial center, a post office and a tire store. There are two additional restaurants proposed along the north of the Mall (in front of the Macy's store) and will be reviewed by the Board of Architecture in the coming months. Surrounding the site is a mix of retail, entertainment, and restaurant uses. PROJECT INFORMATION The most recent use of this parcel is as a bank building and adjacent drive-through facility. The site has been vacant since July, 2009, when the bank relocated to a new building on the south side of the site. The pre-existing drive-through facility was demolished and redeveloped into 239 surface parking stalls in 2010. This project proposes to build a restaurant over the former bank's basement following demolition of the bank. The site work, including parking lot configuration and landscaping was approved and completed under the 2010 permit. The demolition of the bank building was also approved at that time. This project involves only the construction of a new restaurant building over the basement and foundation of the former bank. There is minimal parking reconfiguration and landscaping directly adjacent to the new building that is under review. The remainder of the site design is not being considered under this design review application and no change to the remainder of the site is proposed. PUBLIC COMMENT No public comments have been received. SM Page 2 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA The project is subject to a Public Hearing Design Review under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.28.070. The Board of Architectural Review evaluates the project under the criteria established in TMC 18.60.050 C. The design criteria explain requirements for development proposals. They are the decision criteria from which the Board will evaluate whether to approve, condition, or deny this project. The applicant's response to the design review criteria is Attachment A. Below is the staff analysis and response. 1. SITE PLANNING. a. Building siting, architecture, and landscaping shall be integrated into and blend harmoniously with the neighborhood building scale, natural environment, and development characteristics as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. For instance, a multi family development's design need not be harmoniously integrated with adjacent single-family structures if that existing single-family use is designated as "Commercial" or "High - Density Residential" in the Comprehensive Plan. However, a "Low -Density Residential" (detached single-family) designation would require such harmonious design integration. The proposed project lies in the Tukwila Urban Center. The City's Comprehensive Plan envisions the area as a regional urban center with a desire for development as a high density, regionally oriented and a mixed use center. The proposed restaurant maintains the development pattern that was established on this site in the 1960's with a building set back from the street edge surrounded by parking. Since the project is being developed over the existing foundation, this pattern will not change. However, the new restaurant is oriented to the north, facing Tukwila Parkway. b. Natural features, which contribute to desirable neighborhood character, shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. Natural features include, but are not limited to, existing significant trees and stands of trees, wetlands, streams, and significant topographic features. There are no natural features on the site. c. The site plan shall use landscaping and building shapes to form an aesthetically pleasing and pedestrian scale streetscape. This shall include, but not be limited to facilitating pedestrian travel along the street, using architecture and landscaping to provide a desirable transition from streetscape to the building, and providing an integrated linkage from pedestrian and vehicular facilities to building entries. The site design is pre-existing. The new building will be built on the existing foundation. d. Pedestrian and vehicular entries shall provide a high-quality visual focus using building siting, shapes and landscaping. Such a feature establishes a physical transition between the project and public areas, and establishes the initial sense of high quality development. The site design is pre-existing. The new building will be built on the existing foundation. When the site was redeveloped in 2010, a pedestrian connection was created from Andover Park West along the south side of the site where it connected with a new pedestrian connection that runs from the building to the south toward Seafood City and the mail Mall building. e. Vehicular circulation design shall minimize driveway intersections with the street. The site design is pre-existing. The new building will be built on the existing foundation. f Site perimeter design (i. e., landscaping, structures, and horizontal width) shall be coordinated with site SM Page 3 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 g. development to ensure a harmonious transition between adjacent projects. The site design is pre-existing. The new building will be built on the existing foundation. Varying degrees of privacy for the individual residents shall be provided; increasing from the public right -of way, to common areas, to individual residences. This can be accomplished through the use of symbolic and actual physical barriers to define the degrees of privacy appropriate to specific site area functions. The site design is pre-existing. The new building will be built on the existing foundation. h. Parking and service areas shall be located, designed and screened to interrupt and reduce the visual impact of large paved areas; The site design is pre-existing. The new building will be built on the existing foundation. When the parking area was redesigned in 2010, parking was designed to preserve as many of the existing mature trees as possible. The preservation of mature trees provides shade and screening of the parking area. Parking is spread about the site with parking stalls tucked between site perimeter trees. Parking is dispersed along both the east and west sides of the building with building perimeter parking on the south and north sides. i. The height, bulk, footprint and scale of each building shall be in harmony with its site and adjacent long-term structures. The new building will be twenty-eight feet tall and one story. It is a similar in scale and bulk to the existing bank building. The new building is a modern structure with more modulation and transparency than the existing building. The surrounding buildings are one and two story structures. The current code allows for buildings heights up to 115 feet. The new building is 8,154 square feet and includes a 1,365 square foot enclosed patio for outdoor dining. 2. BUILDING DESIGN a. Architectural style is not restricted; evaluation of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and its ability to harmonize building texture, shape, lines and mass with the surrounding neighborhood. This proposal is for a one story building. The building reflects the prototypical Stadia model, a design new in 2012 for Buffalo Wild Wings restaurants. The design includes some customized elements for the City of Tukwila including brick veneer, window sills, and a reduced wall area devoted to the bright yellow color. The exterior style is a contemporary building with a facade of metal, EFIS, and brick. The face and roof planes vary across each elevation similarly to the northeast corner of the Southcenter Mall. This photo depicts the Stadia model Buffalo Wild Wings under construction. The building proposed for Tukwila is similar but not identical. See Attachment C. SM Page 4 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laser -fiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 b. Buildings shall be of appropriate height, scale, and design/shape to be in harmony with those existing permanent neighboring developments which are consistent with, or envisioned in, the Comprehensive Plan. This will be especially important for perimeter structures. Adjacent structures that are not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan should be considered to be transitional. The degree of architectural harmony required should be consistent with the nonconforming structure's anticipated permanence. The building is one story and twenty-eight feet tall at its highest point. The TUC zone allows for buildings up to 115 feet tall. The scale is similar to the building that is proposed to be replaced and similar or lower in height than the surrounding buildings. The finish materials of brick, metal, and EFIS can be seen on surrounding buildings such as the Southcenter Mall (brick and EFIS) and iFly and Acme bowl (metal). c. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, parapets, stairs and decks shall be integrated into the overall building design. Particular emphasis shall be given to harmonious proportions of these components with those of adjacent developments. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with the anticipated life of the structure. The building components reflect the contemporary style of the building. The size of the windows was increased and sills were added to enhance openings and add additional relief. The parapet wall screens the rooftop mechanicals and is setback from the main plane of the building except on the front wall where the parapet and the entrance wall are integrated into the same surface. A covered patio runs the length of the building on the west elevation. d. The overall color scheme shall work to reduce building prominence and shall blend in with the natural environment. Brick is used to clad portions of the building to reflect the Northwest design vernacular. The building colors include black, shades of gray, red brick, and yellow. The yellow color has been reduced to an accent color from the initial proposal where it covered over half the east elevation. e. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects shall be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting shall be used to provide visual interest. Otherwise monotonous flat walls and uniform vertical planes of individual buildings shall be broken up with building modulation, stairs, decks, railings, and focal entries. Multiple building developments shall use siting and additional architectural variety to avoid inappropriate repetition of building designs and appearance to surrounding properties. In addition to three different textures (stone, stucco, and metal), the building, has the materials applied asymmetrically across the building faces. 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT. a. Existing natural topographic patterns and significant vegetation shall be reflected in project design when they contribute to the natural beauty of the area or are important to defining neighborhood identity or a sense of place. The site design is pre-existing. The new building will be built on the existing foundation. The site perimeter includes a row of mature trees on the northern perimeter and a double row of mature trees on the eastern site perimeter. Redevelopment of the parking lot included preservation of the majority of these trees. b. Landscape treatment shall enhance existing natural and architectural features, help separate public from private spaces, strengthen vistas and important views, provide shade to moderate the effects of large paved areas, and break up visual mass. SM Page 5 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 The landscaping on the site was approved in 2010 as part of the parking lot redevelopment. The only new landscaping on the site is trellises used to screen blank wall surfaces. It is not feasible to add foundation landscaping due to the existing basement and the location of the sidewalks. The basement of the building is day - lit at the building corners with the sidewalks cantilevered over the basement windows. The trellises are shown on the elevations but are not shown on the site plan or landscape plan. The architect has proposed adding planters with Clematis fasciculiflora, variegated evergreen clematis to grow on a trellis. The design details of the planters and trellis were not included. c. Walkways, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas shall promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. Direct pedestrian linkages to the public street, to on-site recreation areas, and to adjacent public recreation areas shall be provided. There are no changes to the site design. Pedestrian connections including a sidewalk along the main entrance from Andover Park West and pedestrian connections from the building across the main entrance drive were created during the parking lot redevelopment. A sidewalk has been added to the south side of the building which completes a pedestrian connection from the south to the north and from the main Mall building to the new restaurant. d. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties shall be provided. The site design is pre-existing. The redevelopment of the parking lot area in 2010 resulted in a parking lot design that preserved the existing mature trees on the site. 4. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES. a. Miscellaneous structures shall be designed as an integral part of the architectural concept and landscape. Materials shall be compatible with buildings, scale shall be appropriate, colors shall be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and structure proportions shall be to scale. Miscellaneous structures consist of an attached trash collection area and a bike rack for five bikes. Wall signs are allowed on wall faces that have an exterior public entrance. The only exterior public entrance is to the north and one wall sign will be allowed on the north face. Incentive signage is allowed on walls without an exterior public entrance provided certain architectural features are included on the walls. Incentive signage is allowed on the west elevation because at least 50% of the wall area between two and seven feet is transparent. The south elevation has been redesigned to include false windows and planted trellises. The east side of the building also has trellises and the canopy has been extended over a portion of the sidewalk to the accessible stalls. These additional features allow the building to qualify for incentive signage on these faces. The size of the wall signs was not reviewed under design review. The allowed sign size is a proportional to the wall size and the details of the sign will be reviewed under a separate sign permit application. This photo depicts false window used on a different restaurant. The false windows will be a different shape and orientation in Tukwila See Attachment C. SM Page 6 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 l b. The use of walls, fencing, planting, berms, or combinations of these shall accomplish screening of service yards and other places that tend to be unsightly. Screening shall be effective in winter and summer. The trash enclosure is attached to the building and screened with an enclosure. c. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof ground or buildings shall be screened from view. Screening shall be designed as an integral part of the architecture (i.e., raised parapets and fully enclosed under roof) and landscaping. Mechanical equipment is roof -mounted and screened with parapet walls. d. Exterior lighting standards and fixtures shall be of a design and size consistent with safety, building architecture and adjacent area. Lighting shall be shielded and restrained in design with no off-site glare spill-over. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors shall not be used unless clearly demonstrated to be integral to building architecture. Site lighting is provided by preexisting parking lot light standards. The building is lit with exterior wall sconces and "wall wash" exterior light fixture illuminating the main window and front face of the building. In addition to the specific criteria of the Board of Architectural Review, proposed development must show consistency with adopted plans and regulations (18.100.030 TMC.) Below are the specific policies from the adopted Comprehensive Plan that relate to the location of the proposal. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES 1. Commercial Areas - Goal 1.7: "Commercial districts that are visually attractive and add value to the community, are visitor and pedestrian friendly, are designed with pride and constructed with quality workmanship, are secure and safe with adequate lighting and convenient access, are uncongested with smooth - flowing traffic patterns, are well-maintained with adequate streetscape landscaping, and are wholesome and in harmony with adjacent uses". a) This significant commercial development requires design review (1.7.1). b) This development requires sidewalks (1.7.2). c) The development provides adequate parking and lighting (1.7.3). This project is being presented to the Board of Architectural Review for review. Sidewalks along the site perimeter and pedestrian connections from the project to the Mall are preexisting. Parking meets code and is preexisting. Site lighting is preexisting and building -mounted lighting will illuminate the new building and adjacent walkway. 2. Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) - Goal 10.2 "Encourage and allow a central focus for the Tukwila Urban Center, with natural and built environments that are attractive, functional, and distinctive, and supports a range of mixed uses promoting business, shopping, recreation, entertainment, and mixed use residential opportunities:" This development is designed with an appropriate scale and proportion; pedestrian -oriented features and street front activity areas, such as ground floor windows, modulated facades, rich details in materials and signage; quality landscaping; an appropriate relationship to adjacent sites; an overall building quality; and with sensitivity to important features such as Green River and Tukwila Pond. (10.2.7) SM Page 7 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 The building is a similar scale to the building it will replace. It is oriented towards the street with a window wall facing towards the west and adjacent to a Mall entrance that serves as a mall -campus "street". The restaurant is also a sports bar with its primary focus on sports entertainment. CONCLUSIONS DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Site Design The site design is pre-existing and is not being changed by this proposal. The proposed building is the same footprint and similar scale to the bank building currently on the site. 2. Building Design. The single building is a contemporary design that is similar in scale and identical footprint to the bank building currently on the site. The wall treatment includes a varied material and color palette including brick, metal, and EFIS in shades of gray, black, and yellow. The walls are varied in height and projection which adds visual interest to the wall faces and accentuates the material and color variety. Similar cladding materials are used on building facades within the immediate vicinity. The proposal is harmonious with surrounding development and meets the design review criteria. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. There are no changes to the existing landscaping and site conditions. The area surrounding the building was redeveloped for surface parking in 2010. The parking and landscaping conformed to code at the time it was developed and includes preservation of mature trees around the site perimeter. The design details of the planters and trellis will need to reviewed and approved during the building permit stage. Clematis fasciculiflora is understood to be available via mail-order and may not be readily available from a contractor's nursery. The landscaper will need to plan ahead to obtain the plants. 4. Miscellaneous Structures. The rooftop mechanical equipment is screened behind parapet walls. The north elevation is permitted one wall sign. The west, east and south elevations are eligible for incentive signage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GUIDELINES. 1. Commercial Areas Goal 1.7 The project meets the Commercial Areas Goal. The project is going through design review. Sidewalks are preexisting and building -mounted lighting is an addition to the site. 2. Tukwila Urban Center Goal 10.2 The project meets this goal. The project increases restaurant and entertainment opportunities in the Urban Center. While on the same footprint as the bank building, the new project is oriented towards the street and improves the pedestrian realm along the western side which is facing a main entrance onto the Mall campus. SM Page 8 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 laserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the BAR adopt the Findings and Conclusions of the staff report and approve the request subject to the following conditions. 1. Trellis and planters are included on the south and east sides need to be added to the site development plans and reviewed for approval. The proposed vine, Clematis fasciculiflora will need to be ordered well in advance of installation to ensure it is available to plant in time for to the Planning final. Conditions of approval that will be added to the future Building Permit: 1. Irrigation is required in the planters. 2. No changes to the Design Review approved plans and conditions will be allowed without prior approval of the Planning Department, these include changes to the exterior finishes of the building, landscaping (both design and plant species), site plan, and site finishes. If you wish to make any changes you must submit a written request along with a justification for the requested change and an explanation as to why the issue was not addressed as part of the design review process. 3. All design elements on the building and the site, including landscaping must be completed prior to final occupancy. The city will not allow the design elements to be deferred; all items must be completed before final inspection. It is highly unlikely that the city will consider financial guarantee in lieu of completing the work. 4. An inspection to approve the exterior finishes (materials and colors) is required before doing any exterior finish work, to ensure that the finishes approved as part of the design review process are being used. 5. Prior to requesting a landscaping inspection the applicant shall provide an affidavit from the landscape architect, stating that the landscaping was installed per approved plans. As part of the landscaping inspection you will need to verify that the irrigation system is working properly. Informational Items 1. The proposed signs have neither been reviewed nor approved. A sign permit shall be applied for and issued for any new signs on the site including building mounted signs. 2. This Design Review is subject to a 14 day appeal period. Commencing construction prior to expiration of the appeal period is at the applicant's risk. SM Page 9 of 9 W:\Planning\Planning Commission\PC 2013 Iaserfiche Packets\7-25 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Buffalo WW DR SR.docx 07/18/2013 July 11, 2013 Attn: Stacey MacGregor City of Tukwila Planning Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Tel: 206.433.7166 Subject: Buffalo Wild Wings at Westfield Southcenter Mall - Design Narrative Dear Miss MacGregor, The overall intent of the design of our building at 225 Tukwila Parkway at the Westfield Southcenter Mall is to meet or exceed the City of Tukwila Design Review Criteria while providing elements that add interest to the building and serve to identify our Client, Buffalo Wild Wings, as a new member of the mall and community. To address the Design Review Criteria we have put together the following narrative: Relationship of Structure to Site — The proposed Buffalo Wild Wings building will be reusing an existing foundation and site conditions from the former Bank of America building. We believe this improves the site dramatically by provided a whole new look to the building and does so in the most efficient way possible. By reusing the existing foundation we are minimizing the environmental impact to the site. The parking on the site was recently updated in 2010 and will remain. The main massing of the building is 20 feet tall. There are several steps in the building to add architectural interest. The center clerestory of the building is 28 feet tall and is the tallest point of the building. The massing of the new building is closer is keeping with the character of the mall than the previous Bank of America building. Relationship of Structure to Site to Adjoining Area — As part of our site improvements we have extended and connected the pedestrian path around the South end of our building, to our entry on the North side of the building. This walkway will be covered on the East side of the building to provide pedestrians protection from the weather. Landscaping and Site Treatment — The site landscaping was updated in 2010 along with the parking lot renovation. We plan to keep this landscaping intact as well as add some greenery to the building itself in the form of wall mounted trellises and winter hardy plants that can sustain foliage all year long. The exterior lighting of the building is being used to down -light and enhance the trellises, walkway, and entry and exits of the building. Building Design - Our building is the latest in design standards from Buffalo Wild Wings. Its design serves to be a family friendly environment and a fixture of the mall. The components of the building are well proportioned and balanced with the materials used, such as real brick veneer, textured EIFS in various colors, and accents of yellow metal cladding. The building also incorporates a black metal clad equipment roof screen to hide all mechanical equipment from view of the public. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture — We have provided bicycle parking adjacent to the entry on the North side as a piece of furniture to the building. We believe that the features of our building and site meet the Design Review Criteria of the City of Tukwila and serve to integrate this project into the community and the mall. Sincerely, Jonathan Jaeger MBH Architects Attachment A Stacy MacGregor From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hello Stacey, Jonathan Jaeger <JonathanJ@mbharch.com> Monday, June 17, 2013 5:14 PM Stacy MacGregor 'Jared Taylor'; Torrence Lindell(TLindell@buffalowildwings.com); mklein@buffalowildwings.com RE: Technical Comments #1 Buffalo Wild Wings Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA-Stadia_Elevations 1-Rev06.pdf; Tukwila, WA-Stadia_Elevations 2-Rev06.pdf Please see the attached elevations for your review. If you could take a look at these before our official resubmittal of the planning comments and provide feedback we would greatly appreciate it. The revisions made are in response to Section 7, Building Design. I have retyped the original comments and responded in green. 7. BUILDING DESIGN: a. Real brick or natural stone that reflects a Northwest design vernacular is preferred over faux brick. — The faux cement fiber brick has been substituted for a brick veneer product that will provide a more natural look. b. Window frames and sills should be prominent and substantial to enhance openings and add additional relief. — Sills have been added at the windows. The overall window size has also been enlarged. An eyebrow has been added to the large window on the East elevation. c. Describe the location of mechanical equipment and demonstrate that all mechanicals are screened from view. — Mechanical equipment is shown dashed on the attached elevations and is fully screened from view. d. The yellow color should be used only as an accent color and should not encompass half of the east elevation. The yellow on the north and south elevations is an acceptable use of a bright accent color. — The yellow portion of the East elevation has been reduced in favor of the Gauntlet Grey EIFS system. e. The materials board shows the materials/colors "Venetian Stucco -white finish" which is color #6 on the proposed elevations legend. I can't find it used on the elevation. Also, the legend lists items #5: EIFS in Dark Gray which isn't included on the materials board. — The Venetian Stucco will be a concrete colored finish and is used at the lip of the entry element surrounding the double entry doors on the North elevation. The "dark gray" will be matched to Sherwin Williams SW7019 — Gauntlet Gray. The "light gray" will be matched to Sherwin Williams SW7018 — Dovetail Gray. Swatches of these colors will be included in the resubmittal package. f. There are blank wall surfaces on the west, south and east elevations. Break up the blank walls with planted trellises, planters, decorative relief work/wall treatment, etc. to provide visual relief from blank wall surfaces. — Wall mounted trellises have been added to the blank wall areas on the South and East elevations. Best regards, Jonathan Jaeger Associate Project Manager arch 2470 Mariner Square Loop, Alameda, CA 94501 t 510 865 8663 -1'510 865 1611 jonathanj@mbharch.com www.mbharch.com From: Jared Taylor[mailto:jaredCagoldenpropertydevelopment.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 9:51 AM 1 To: 'Stacy MacGregor'; Jonathan Jaeg Subject: RE: Technical Comments #1 Buffalo Wild Wings Tukwila, WA Thank you Stacy for sending the attached Technical Comments. Our Architectural Team (Jon) will begin reviewing these ASAP. I understand from your attached letter we must first send you revised PDFs The letter states we are scheduled for a July 27th hearing, but that is a Saturday, is this correct? We look forward to completing the SEPA addendum. Thank you, Jared Taylor GOLDEN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC 10 S. Grant Street Roseville, CA 95678 805 440 7537 Tel. 91.6 496 9769 Fax jared@goldenpd.com From: Stacy MacGregor[mailto:Stacy.MacGregor@TukwilaWA.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 9:40 AM To: Jared Taylor(iared©goldenpropertydevelopment.com) Subject: Technical Comments #1 Jared, Attached are technical comments to your design review application. I expect to have your SEPA addendum signed today or tomorrow. Let me know if you have any question. Kindly, Stacy MacGregor Tukwila Assistant Planner /Tuesday- Friday 8:30-3 6300 Southcenter Blvd / Tukwila, WA 98188 ph: (206) 433-7166 / fx: (206) 431-3665 Stacy.MacGreyor@TukwilaWA.gov / www.TukwilaWA.gov The City of opportunity, the community of choice. 2 City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Board of Architectural Review will be holding two public hearings on July 25, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW & PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L13-018 Jared Taylor for Golden Property Development Public Hearing Design Review for a new 5,880 sf Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant on a pre- existing pad site. 225 Tukwila Parkway; at the northeast corner of the Westfield Southcenter Mall site. L13-035 Department of Community Development, City of Tukwila Zoning Code amendment in response to I-502 to adopt development regulations pertaining to producers, processors and retailers of recreational marijuana. City-wide Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Distribution: July 11, 2013, Seattle Times Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners/Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, and File. UFFALO WILD WINGS RESTAURANT ADDENDUM HEARING DESIGN REVIEW AND SEPA EIS 13-018, L13-018, E13-006 "ABED TAYLOR FOR GOLDEN PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT 5 TUKWILA PARKWAY TO SUBMIT COMMENTS OR TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE Department of Community Development 2G14 6300 $outhcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila. WA Oil i ng city al J tddwiea Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Associated File Number (s): Notice of Application , E13-006 Notice of Decision x Notice of Public Hearing Mailer's signature: Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _10th day of _July , 2013_ Project Name: Buffalo Wild Wings Project Number: PL13-018 Associated File Number (s): L13-018, L13- , E13-006 Mailing requested by: St y acGrego Mailer's signature: 7 (ir/(_ " W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing for Design Review 225 Tukwila Parkway File#s: PW13-018, L13-018, L13-012, E13-006 Project Description: This application is for a new restaurant on an outparcel at the Westfield Southcenter Mall. The restau- rant, Buffalo Wild Wings, will be located at the location former- ly occupied by Bank of America. Property Owner : WEA Southcenter, LLC Project Applicant: Jared Taylor for Golden Property Development Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor 206-433-7166 Jared Taylor, applicant for Golden Property Development, has applied for Design Review and SEPA EIS Addendum for a new restaurant on an existing pad site at the Westfield South - center Mall. The restaurant will be located on the northeast comer of the mall site at 225 Tukwila Parkway. The SEPA Addendum was issued on June 5, 2013. Comments and Appeals: You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing before the Board of Architec- • tural Review, scheduled for 6:30 pm, July 25, 2013 at the 1 Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. You may review the application and submit written com- ments on the project to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on (14 days) July 25th, 2013. You may request a copy of any decision. determination and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing for Design Review 225 Tukwila Parkway File #s: PW I3-018, L13-01.8, L13-01.2, E13-006 Property Owner : WEA Southcenter, LLC Project Applicant: Jared Taylor for Golden Property Development Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor 206-433-7166 Project Description: This application is for a new restaurant on an outparcel at the Westfield Southcenter Mall. The restau- rant, Buffalo Wild Wings, will be located at the location former- ly occupied by Bank of America. Jared Taylor, applicant for Golden Property Development, has applied for Design Review and SEPA EIS Addendum for a new restaurant on an existing pad site at the Westfield South - center Mall. The restaurant will be located on the northeast comer of the mall site at 225 Tukwila Parkway. The SEPA Addendum was issued on June 5, 2013. Comments and Appeals: You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing before the Board of Architec- tural Review, scheduled for 6:30 pm, July 25, 2013 at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. You may review the application and submit written com- ments on the project to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on (14 days) July 25th, 2013. You may request a copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing for Design Review 225 Tukwila Parkway File #s: PW I 3-018, L1.3-018, L13-012, E13-006 Property Owner : Project Applicant: Project Planner: WEA Southcenter, LLC Jared Taylor for Golden Property Development Stacy MacGregor 206-433-7166 Project Description: This application is for a new restaurant on an outparcel at the Westfield Southcenter Mall. The restau- rant, Buffalo Wild Wings, will be located at the location former- ly occupied by Bank of America. Jared Taylor, applicant for Golden Property Development, has applied for Design Review and SEPA EIS Addendum for a new restaurant on an existing pad site at the Westfield South - center Mall. The restaurant will be located on the northeast comer of the mall site at 225 Tukwila Parkway. The SEPA Addendum was issued on June 5, 2013. Comments and Appeals: You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing before the Board of Architec- tural Review, scheduled for 6:30 pm, July 25, 2013 at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevar.. You may review the application and submit written com- ments on the project to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on (14 days) July 25th, 2013. You may request a copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. City of Tukwila Notice of Public Hearing for Design Review 225 Tukwila Parkway File #s: PW 13-018, L13-018, L13-012, E13-006 Property Owner : WEA Southcenter, LLC Project Applicant: Jared Taylor for Golden Property Development Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor 206-433-7166 Project Description: This application is for a new restaurant on an outparcel at the Westfield Southcenter Mall. The restau- rant, Buffalo Wild Wings, will be located at the location forme ly occupied by Bank of America. Jared Taylor, applicant for Golden Property Development, has applied for Design Review and SEPA EIS Addendum for a new restaurant on an existing pad site at the Westfield South - center Mall. The restaurant will be located on the northeast comer of the mall site at 225 Tukwila Parkway. The SEPA Addendum was issued on June 5, 2013. Comments and Appeals: You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing before the Board of Architec- tural Review, scheduled for 6:30 pm, July 25, 2013 at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. You may review the application and submit written com- ments on the project to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on (14 days) July 25th, 2013. You may request a copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. 00 ct CO 00 0 0 0 0 N CO oo co oo co in co rn rn ch o, am of 0. NI D Q w a) ca E- w - LI > w J U < vii Y v CO 0 Cr vv CC 1- 3190 160th AVE SE NW REGIONAL OFFICE DEPT OF ECOLOGY PO BOX 47703 SEPA REVIEW WA DEPT OF ECOLOGY PO BOX 40117 ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL 1904 3rd AVENUE, STE 105 SEPA REVIEW PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 10 S. Grant Street 2800 Southcenter Mall c a) c C C� 13) CCup O. re o c • ra Q) • L S- Q CV o Q L o a a -0 C• 4- - N O C.▪ ) (J Andy Ciarocchi 00 CO 00 00 M 00 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO CO .-i M r-1 CO 00 CO 00 ri 00 00 00 CO 00 00 CO 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 CO ri CO 0 r -I r -I r -I r -I O r -I r -I r -I r -I r-1 r -I ri r-1 r -I r -I r -I r -I r -I r -I r-1 r -I r-1 r -I r -I 0 0 r -I 00 00 00 CO N 00 00 CO 00 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 00 CO 00 Q 01 01 01 01 01 al 01 01 01 01 01 01 Ol 01 a)01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 al N a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a CO CO CO CO co CO CO OS CO CO CO CD (13 CM ft CO O3 CO co co co CO CO co >. Y Y Y Y L Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .4- 3=. 0 c0 0... 3 ...=...... u 1- F- F- 1- U1— F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- 1- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F— F- N N W 0r 0 0 a 6400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD W O a w z x 500 TUKWILA PKWY SEATTLE CITY OF SPU-WTR 100 ANDOVER PARK W OPEN FRAME LLC 500 SOUTHCENTER MALL FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC PO Box 130940 WESTFIELD MALL Property Tax Dept 310 Strander Blvd OLIVE GARDEN 230 Strander Blvd CHEESECAKE FACTORY 402 Strander Blvd 150 Andover Park W CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN 350 Baker Blvd LA FITNESS J LL 80 Andover Park W TERRIYAKI TIME >. >,- >- >- >- a a a a a CU 4—. ca CO CO 00 CO CU C Y Y Y Y Y F- ▪ F- F- F- F- F - Lf ri O1 N r -c Ln N N • N O O Cr) CO M M MK) W I- J W z F - DISCOUNT GUNS ARMED FORCES RECRUITING JS DENTAL MATTRESS DISCOUNTERS SUBWAY 100 Andover Park W #160 O O M O r -I Co r-1 ri Xt tk U tt Y Y Y Y SUSHILAND 100 Andover Pa 100 Andover Pa YETI YOGURT 100 Andover Pa a anon a 100 Andover Pa Charles Berry - UPS STORE 70 Andover Park W Pearle Vision a a) t 4-O [o 18827 BOTHELL WAY NE BETA HOLDINGS LTD -The Annex Kirkland WA PO BOX 654 OPEN FRAME LLC Seattle WA 1932 1ST AVE STE 1000 MSI 6400 TUKWILA - C/0 Martin Smith Cita of Ju ftwiea Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I,CKYanot le.,e>, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application 1,13-018 Notice of Decision x Notice of Public Hearing ✓J Notice of Public Meeting / Determination of Non- Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action x Hand delivered to the mall tenants by mall staff Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this C\ day of ,abl3 Project Name: Buffalo Wild Wings Project Number: PL13-018 Associated File Number (s): 1,13-018 Mailing requested by: S ac ,. cGregor A__ ✓J Mailer's signature: 0 / W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMSWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC SENT VIA EMAIL j ared @ goldenpd.com June 5, 2013 Jared Taylor 10 South Grand Street Roseville, CA 95678 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development RE: Buffalo Wild Wings L13-018, E13-006, PL13-018 Dear Mr. Taylor, Jack Pace, Director The City has completed its review of the above Public Hearing Design Review application. The application was submitted on April 30, 2013 and deemed complete on April 10, 2013 for the purpose of meeting state - mandated time requirements. Please find below a list issues compiled by Community Development, Public Works, Fire, and Building Department staff regarding this project. In order to move forward with your application, we need a response on the following comments. Some may involve a revision of the plans and other comments may just be addressed in writing as way of an explanation. Planning Department: Contact Stacy MacGregor at (206) 433-7166 regarding the following comments. MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS 1. The narration discussing the design review criteria is pretty brief. While the majority of the criteria (landscaping and site design) are not changed by this project, the building design, accessory structures and relationship of the building to the surroundings all need to be discussed. The design review criteria for discussion can be found under Tukwila Municipal Code 18.60.050 B. 2. Provide a rendering or photo montage of the building. I was able photos of this prototype online; the photos illustrate the detail and articulation in the building surface that is lost in the elevations and could help inform the planning commission of the building's appearance. 3. The "Parking Analysis" table provided is inaccurate. The numbers proved by Bill Fortunato at PacLand were used to determine that parking standards have been met. Please revise the table to reflect the following: Parking Calculation Useable Square Footage for Parking Calculation 1,424,198 sf SM Page 1 of 3 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\L13-012 Tech Comments 1.doc 06/05/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Parking Required TMC Figure 18-7 (5 stalls per 1,000 sf) 7,121 stalls Parking Reduction (4.5% Per L-04-055) 320 stalls Total Required Parking 6,801 stalls Parking Provided Level 1 parking (including garages and BWW parcel) 5,971 stalls Level 2 (Cascade and Olympic Garages) 373 stalls Level 3 (Cascade and Olympic Garages and Roof) 584 stalls Total parking provided 6,928 stalls Parking Surplus: 127 Stalls From the Design Review Criteria 4. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE. a. Does not apply No changes to existing conditions are proposed. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA. a. The north elevation needs to show the trash enclosure. 6. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT. a. Does not apply. No changes to existing conditions are proposed. 7. BUILDING DESIGN a. Real brick or natural stone that reflects a Northwest design vernacular is preferred over faux brick. b. Window frames and sills should be prominent and substantial to enhance openings and add additional relief. c Describe the location of mechanical equipment and demonstrate that all mechanicals are screened from view. d. The yellow color should be used only as an accent color and should not encompass half of the east elevation. The yellow on the north and south elevations is an acceptable use of a bright accent color. e. The materials board shows the materials/colors "Venetian Stucco- white finish" which is color #6 on the proposed elevations legend. I can't find it used on the elevation. Also, the legend lists items #5: EFS in Dark Gray which isn't included on the materials board. f. There are blank wall surfaces on the west south, and east elevations. Break up the blank walls with planted trellises, planters, decorative relief work/wall treatment, etc. to provide visual relief from blank wall surfaces. 8. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES ANSD STREET FURNITURE. a. Provide details or cut sheets for bike racks, light fixtures, and any other exterior fixtures. Public Works Department: Contact Dave McPherson at (206) 431-2448 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1. A Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application has been received from the Applicant by Public Works. 2. Applicant shall submit a Traffic Concurrency Test Fee per City ordinance no. 2155 and 2110; in order to receive Notice of Passing the Test before the City will consider an application for any development permit (or) building permit to be complete. 3. A Transportation Impact Fee applies to the future Building permit for this project. SM Page 2 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings \L13-012 Tech Comments 1.doc 06/05/2013 Building Department: Contact Bob Benedicto at (206) 431-3670 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) No conflicts relative to design review at this time. Discovery wil take place at permit plan review. 2) Regarding the City's internal process: a. The build permit will not be issued until final approval of the DEMO permit. b. The menu indicates that a state liquor license will be needed; a liquor license cannot be processed until a business license is issued. c. A business license will not be issued until the final inspection approval is granted for the building permit. Fire Department: Contact Don Tomaso at (206) 575-4407 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1. Fire and Park Impact fees apply to this project. Next Steps Your next step is to address the comments made in this letter. Once you have addressed the comments and revised the plans, first send me electronic copies for review. There are not any civil plan changes needed for design review. Your project is scheduled for public hearing on July 27. In order to make this date, all outstanding design issues need to be resolved and drawings reflect the final proposal by about the first of July. You are welcome to provide your prosed changes and additional information requested via email for review. I will let you know in early July the plans sheets, number of copies, and sizes needed for the Board of Architectural review hearing. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 206-433-7166 or by email at stacy.macgregor@tukwilawa.gov. Si erely, Stacy MacGre Assistant Planner cc. File (PL13-011) Attachments: Ordinance 2110 Ordinance 2155 Ordinance 2318 SM Page 3 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings \L13-012 Tech Comments 1.doc 06/05/2013 Cita of rluftwita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I YU c :i-\ ire 5t VA-A:A 3 ►'-`.►,' ?" M1; , r_ HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Name: Buffalo Wild Wings Project Number: L13-018, E13-006 Notice of Public Hearing 1 Mailer's signature: ��` Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda x Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _16 day of may in the year 2013 . Pi S/ h dD et,t1 t .k5 aj- I , Project Name: Buffalo Wild Wings Project Number: L13-018, E13-006 Mailing requested by: ,$t •- cy MacGregor 1 Mailer's signature: ��` C:\Users\DCD-Intern2\Documents\COURTNEY_PLANNING\tempi ffidavit of Distribution.doc &hi of gaftwita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: x Notice of Application E13-006 Notice of Decision Mailing requested by: Stacy MacGr or Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting , Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action x NOA for a Public Hearing DR & SEPA Addendum Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _16 day of _May _, _2013 Project Name: Buffalo Wild Wings Project Number: PL13-018 Associated File Number (s)• L13-018, E13-006 Mailing requested by: Stacy MacGr or Mailer's signature: /) Ze , .0 W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC ti City of Tukwila Notice of Application for a Public Hearing Design Review & SEPA Addendum 225 Tukwila Parkway File #s: PW13-018, L13-018, L13-012, E13-006 Property Owner : WEA Southcenter, LLC Project Applicant: Jared Taylor for Golden Property Development Project Planner: Stacy MacGregor 206-433-7166 Project Description: This application is for a new restaurant on an outparcel at the Westfield Southcenter Mall. The restau- rant, Buffalo Wild Wings, will be located at the location former- ly occupied by Bank of America. The City of Tukwila was approached by the Westfield Co. in 2003 regarding their proposal to expand their recently pur- chased facility, Southcenter Mall. On April 24, 2003 a Deter- mination of Significance and Scoping Notice was issued. The focus of the EIS was on transportation, air quality and on the impacts on local government operations and services. A DEIS was issued in June 2004 and the Final EIS was issued in October 2004. (File No. E03-010). The majority of the im- provements considered in the 2004 EIS were on the south side of the mall side. The EIS addendum will consider im- pacts to the north side of the mall site from the addition of this restaurant. Design Review will evaluate the building's design and site layout against established criteria. Comments and Appeals: You may review the application and submit written comments on the project to DCD, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100. Comments must be received by 5:OOpm on (14 days) May 30, 2013. You may request a copy of any decision, determination and your appeal rights by calling 206-433-7166. You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project. . NAME XEROX SEATTLE CITY OF SPU-WTR OPEN FRAME LLC FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC WESTFIELD MALL Property Tax Dept OLIVE GARDEN CHEESECAKE FACTORY FIDELITY CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN LA FITNESS I -FLY TERRIYAKI TIME TAN ELITE DISCOUNT GUNS ARMED FORCES RECRUITING JS DENTAL MATTRESS DISCOUNTERS SUBWAY SUSHILAND EQPT YETI YOGURT QDOBA Charles Berry - UPS STORE Pearle Vision BETA HOLDINGS LTD -The Annex OPEN FRAME LLC MSI 6400 TUKWILA - C/O Martin Smith ADDRESS 6400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 500 TUKWILA PKWY 100 ANDOVER PARK W 500 SOUTHCENTER MALL PO Box 130940 310 Strander Blvd 230 Strander Blvd 402 Strander Blvd 150 Andover Park W 350 Baker Blvd 349 Tukwila Py 80 Andover Park W 325 Tan elite 321 Tukwila Py 349 Tukwila Py 327 Tukwila Py 301 Tukwila Py 305 Tukwila Py 100 Andover Park W #160 100 Andover Park W #110 100 Andover Park W #B 100 Andover Park W, #130 100 Andover Park W #150 70 Andover Park W 18827 BOTHELL WAY NE PO BOX 654 1932 1ST AVE STE 1000 city st zip Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Carlsbad CA 92013 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Tukwila WA 98188 Bothell WA 98011 Kirkland WA 98083 Seattle WA 98101 name agency address city st zip DEPT OF ECOLOGY NW REGIONAL OFFICE 3190 160th AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98008 WA DEPT OF ECOLOGY SEPA REVIEWP,Q0/1%(9/e&/Jy PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504 WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT PO BOX 40117 LACEY WA 98504 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY SEPA REVIEW 1904 3rd AVENUE, STE 105 SEATTLE WA 98101 Jared Taylor Golden Property Development 10 S. Grant Street Roseville CA 95678 Andy Ciarocchi Westfield Property Management 2800 Southcenter Mall Tukwila WA 98188 May 16, 2013 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director JARED TAYLOR Golden Property Development 10 S Grant St Roseville Ca., 95678 RE: Notice of Application and Public Hearing, PL13-018, (L13-018, E13-006) Buffalo Wild Wings, 225 Tukwila Parkway, Tukwila WA Dear Jared Taylor: There is a fee due on your permit application in the amount of $33.00 to cover fees associated with Notice of Application and Public Hearing mailing the attached public notice. The number of required notices sent for your application was 33 which included property owners and tenants within 500 feet of your project site as well as interested parties and agencies with jurisdiction. The cost is based on the land use fee schedule adopted by Resolution Number 1779 covering Public Notice mailings required for your application. This fee covers the attached notice only. Additional fees may be assessed for future mailings or other review tasks per the fee schedule. This amount needs to be paid before the city can continue processing your permit application. The payment may be paid by cash, check or credit card. The city will accept credit card payments by phone. If paying by check please send the check made out to: City of Tukwila Attn: Teri 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 206 431 3670. ll e 1 Sy: ;.hl Administrative Support Technician Cc; Stacy MacGregor MD Invoicing Public Mailings.doc Page I of 1 05/16/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Developrw C E IV ED MAY 012013 TUKWIW PUBLIC WORKS File Numbers L13 -018 -design review E13-006- SEPA addendum PL13-018- project file LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building ublic Works Fire Dept. CI Police Department Project: Buffalo Wild Wings Address: 225 Tukwila Parkway ircel: 9202470100 Date transmitted: 5-2-13 Response requested by: 5-9-13 Staff coordinator: Stacy MacGregor Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials asneede SEPA Addendum to EIS for mall expansion and Desig Review permit (s66.A1? CLtE.D cositylem-s) s1'4//.3 Plan check date: Comments prepared by: Update date: MEMORANDUM www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson0/1 Development Engineer David.McPherson TukwilaWA.gov DATE: May 16, 2013 SUBJECT: Buffalo Wild Wings 225 Tukwila Parkway TL no. 920247-0100 SEPA, Design Review, and Miscellaneous Comments SEPA — E13-006 A Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application has been received from the Applicant by Public Works. Applicant shall submit a Traffic Concurrencv Test Fee per City ordinance no. 2155 and 2110; in order to receive Notice of Passing the Test before the City will consider an application for any development permit (or) building permit to be complete. Design Review — L13-018 A Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application has been received from the Applicant by Public Works. Applicant shall submit a Traffic Concurrency Test Fee per City ordinance no. 2155 and 2110; in order to receive Notice of Passing the Test before the City will consider an application for any development permit (or) building permit to be complete. Miscellaneous Comments A Transportation Impact Fee applies to the future Building permit for this project. Page 1 of 1 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Numbers L13 -018 -design review E13-006- SEPA addendum PL13-018- project file LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Public Works ire Dept. 1❑I Police Department Project: Buffalo Wild Wings Address: 225 Tukwila Parkway rcel: 9202470100 Date transmitted: 5-2-13 Response requested by: 5-9-13 Staff coordinator: Stacy MacGregor Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials asneede SEPA Addendum to EIS for mall expansion and Desig Review permit Plan check date: 5 k3 Comments prepared by: Update date: TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Numbers L13 -018 -design review E13-006- SEPA addendum PL13-018- project file LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Public Works Fire Dept. Police Department Project: Buffalo Wild Wings Address: 225 Tukwila Parkway rcel: 9202470100 Date transmitted: 5-2-13 Response requested by: 5-9-13 Staff coordinator: Stacy MacGregor Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials asneede SEPA Addendum to EIS for mall expansion and Desig Review permit • No G.ev 7 RrGATroe Tn :N IR' .)/ PO pieforrtme, &'LL -T,4ta f G T -P A'1fr FE4t/ pSLIRELR fEP Co/%fME tJr4 : (f?iE?4 /M4 ©,ct R r xtreNa' t, 777 F3[I/Gt7/1./4 "pgemrr wig tJor BE / 1iED IJNT?G F/N4L 4PP'4f4 .oF T4,6 -F► lM4 .� Gic�N 2. 77/6114 MGN�Cf !ND/'4TE'S T 14r TXE y Lola NEE© A +5rzT� L,au ei t'./ca'Als ( AIWO7 Be PleoG,E ,E0 i/Nri� Eq H4 OE 4 81161/455 LIcEN`•5 Thy f.ANRt4r ger 1, 11 5 L /CEN cwri. TWE F W W, I NSp 4 P1'igoExt n o� ' crit ?� N ' til tT Plan check date: /// /w Comments prepared by: le& Update date: RECEIVED R 30' 2013 01-v LU April 29, 2013 City of Tukwila Planning and Development Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188-2544 Attention: Stacy MacGregor Re: Buffalo Wild Wings Description Letter 225 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Stacy, This project proposes the demolition of the existing building previously occupied by "Bank Of America". The existing building pad will remain and new exterior walls and roof will be constructed with a new fire sprinkler system. The new tenant will be a full service restaurant names "Buffalo Wild Wings", occupancy classification "A2 -Assembly". The new building will include an enclosed patio area on the existing building pad. Minor parking lot striping modification will be performed for new ADA compliant stalls and ramps. Sitework will be limited to trenching for new utilities as required. Landscaping will not be modified; any disturbed landscaping will be replaced to match existing. All existing parking lot lighting is to remain. The existing trash enclosure will also be redesigned as a part of this work. Sincerely, Terry Womack Golden Property Development, LLC Golden Property Development, LLC 10 S. Grant Street Roseville, CA 95678 858-652-0336 Tel. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail.: plannink@TukwilaWA.gov RECEIVED APR 30 2013 CO MMUN DFVE=LOPML-N I AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. ss ..• • • - .. . • ' • and correct to 1 - . • . - ire r irdge-- 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, eugineers, —contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at ke,1,c �Cc. -L r i'� 11 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unles the loss or damage is the result of theseleinegligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at and eYcef" 40 k(. eleienT (city), lair- (state), on 21 1 , 20 13 tAk A4i t.,lcl'Pr" s + / v`l?n ? � � ej►- f - LLC. o.s o..` p ...4 ..f I..) �c.�1 _lam te4 r LL- r (Print Name) 14' ' C. a fro c' acbc 0 v1711 f /,lc� I1 al u A- ci `S 8 g (Address) zc4 -2'U - n Yz 3 (Phone; umber _ ature) On this day personally appeared before me AUDIRL-uf IlA1 ucc ti to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS a'S11a4 DAY OF RplaL , 201-5 R,. a t4O H:\ and Use Applic Ste oiyy��a�•`h,ce-Jan2011.doc 1111110% NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at tam , WP My Commission expires on LI 15 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1/ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). ✓ 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". 4. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 5. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule online. ✓ 6. Revised SEPA Environmental Checklist describing the changes. If the changes proposed create additional environmental impacts a new SEPA application may be required (see SEPA Application Packet). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 7. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 8. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. 9. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. FIALand Use Applications in PDF1Design Review -Major Mod-Jan201 I.doc ` Check items submitted with application Information Ree !d. May be waived in unusual cases, up( 7proval of both Public Works and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 10. New concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic if the original notices have expired or the project impacts have significantly changed. 11. New sewer and water availability letters from the .rovider district if the ori:inal ones have ex fired or if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed only if the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila . Forms are available at the DCD office. ✓ 12. A written discussion of the changes proposed to the project and their consistency with decision criteria, see application. This is your opportunity to highlight the design features of your project. ✓ 13. If the proposed changes affect sensitive areas or their buffers provide two copies of revised sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. SURVEY: 14. (a) The survey must include a graphic scale and north arrow. It shall be drawn with black ink in record of survey format. This shall be stamped by the surveyor. (b) An existing and proposed boundary and topographic survey (2 ft. contours including a minimum 20 ft. beyond the property line) with all structures, easements, encumbrances and right-of- way width. Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. (c) Existing and proposed building footprints. (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. (e) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. SITE PLAN: ✓ 15. (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". 1 (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. 1 (c) Vicinity Maw with site location, does not have to be to scale. _ (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. 1 (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. (f) Loading and service areas. (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors, height and materials. 1 (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. / (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50%). LANDSCAPE PLAN: ✓ 16. (a) Landscape planting plan that meets the standards at TMC 18.52 by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36". ✓ (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review -Major Mod-Jan20l I.doc Check items • submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: ✓ 17. (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 15%, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. (d) Existing and proposed building footprints. CIVIL PLANS: ✓ 18. (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36". ti Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. See http://www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwperrnit.html for further information. (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. (d) Total expected cut and fill. I (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. ✓ (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to http://www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwpermit.html. (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: ✓ 19. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. 20. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. 21. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is recommended. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). 22. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 23. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. H:V.and Use Applications in PDF\Design Review -Major Mod-Jan201 I.doc RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA fin 30'201JESIGN REVIEW - Department of Community Develop enter 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9B71$A ti �nENT Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX:(206)14 Y'3665 moffifiekTioN E-mail: planningLiTukwilaWA.gov APPLICATION th .. „ .. ..... . . . .. .:' FOR STAFF USE ONLY "Permits Plus Type: P -DR Planner: File Number: 1...4 -- O G g Application Complete Date: Project File Number: PZ____/ 3- d/ Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: E ( 3 — C ) ( NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Buffalo Wild Wings LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 225 Tukwila Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: (805) 440-7537 FAX: E-mail: jared@goldenpd.com Jared Taylor 10 S. Grant Street Roseville, CA 95678 Signature: H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\Design Review -Major Mod-Jan201 I.doc Date: 04/29/2013 liatEr- v- c 3 7 '4' ma17,1n4 7 E-- 1 ]NI1 )J HdOdd D Wok S I Fri 62 AVEri 1 I L. Andover Park West Christensen Rd ( i Dennis Heath, Architect 2470 Mariner Sq. Loop Alameda CAS 01 i EGE(V� APR 3 0 2013 (;(I;JiI/(tJt4I i)i.VL-LUi'ML-N f ty TITLE: SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN - SKETCH NO: DR -SK -01 SCALE: N.T.S DATE: 04-16-2013 PROJECT NUMBER: 46997 REFERENCE SHEET NO: A000 BUFFALO WILD WINGS TUKWILA WA r g3MCr°na o 717Tf-1 7[1.52 225 TUKWILA PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA 98188 STADIA PROTOTYPE NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION :CElVED APR 3 0.2013 1)1-.VL_LO MEN F L/3 D4 211(1 Virile, SAure Lose Alemele, to 66501 lel 510 I65 0667 lee 510 065 1611 BUFFALO WILD WINGS LOCATED AT: CL PR BUOFiMLO WIIILD WINGS LJ (i) (/) CDz CC Z O U 0 PLANNING SUBMITTAL Lig PROJECT NUMBER 46997 SHEET NUMBER DR -00 - 4 `^ ( r` ..,,,D t - - f _ # '– • ■`.'. ..__ _ VICINITY MAP .4.4—THE . - • " .. PROJECT NARRATIVE SEAT COUNT 'I__ } - I- - - - — --1E `_ f , .�♦ ._ .. • '_-.� : - _ .... .. SITE PLAN -_ I. _ j 1 N T THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE DEMOLIRON OF THE ERSTING BUILDING PRENOUSLY OCCUPIED BY "BANK OF AMERICA". THE EXISTING BUILDING PAD WILL REMAIN AND NEW EXTERIOR WALLS ANO ROOF WILL 8E CONSTRUCTED WITH A NEW FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. THE NEW TENANT WILL BE A NU. SERVICE RESTAURANT NAMED "BUFFALO WILD WINGS', OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION .A2 -ASSEMBLY.. NEW BUILDING WILL INCLUDE AN ENCLOSED PATIO AREA ON THE EXISTING BUILDING PAD. MINOR PARKING LOT STRIPING MODIFICATION WILL BE PERFORMED FOR NEW ADA COMPLIANT STALLS AMD RAMPS. SITEWORK WILL BE UNITED TO TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES A5 REWIRED. LANDSCAPING WILL NOT BE MODIFIED: ANY DISTURBED LANDSCAPING WILL BE REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING. ALL EXISTING PARKING LOT UGHRNG IS TO REMAIN. THE EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE WILL ALSO BE REDESIGNED AS A PART OF THIS WORK. AREA SEATS PER AREA DINING 'A. 46 NNING'B• 24 NNW 'C' 32 b BR DNNG 81 MING TOM. 229 PATO - 84 PATNI TOTAL 84 SEATING TOTAL 313 PROJECT INFORMATION INDEX OF DRAWINGS (N) BUILDING SQUARE AREA: 8,451 SF (INCLUDES ENCLOSED PATIO AREA) DR -00 COM SKEET DR 01 PROPOSED SM PLN DR -02 PROPOSED ROOMS DR -03 CML SRX PLN DR -04 DOSING LANDSCAR PUN L/3 D4 211(1 Virile, SAure Lose Alemele, to 66501 lel 510 I65 0667 lee 510 065 1611 BUFFALO WILD WINGS LOCATED AT: CL PR BUOFiMLO WIIILD WINGS LJ (i) (/) CDz CC Z O U 0 PLANNING SUBMITTAL Lig PROJECT NUMBER 46997 SHEET NUMBER DR -00 it 1 ■ 1 1 1 1 1 TUKWILA PARKWAY ,44 • • K 1 1- (N) BIKE PARKING LOOPS FOR 5 MIN. BIKES a'4 (N) ENCLOSED PATIO N. lir MI IN it NI • - MAIN ENTRY (E) LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN, TYP. PROPERTY UNE 1 STORY 8,451 SF (ND CHANGE TO BUILDING FOOTPRINT) a'4 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO SIDEWALK \PUBLIC STREET TAKEOUT PARKING STALLS ®®c b6J t •• fa • • !r C C C Y 8 (1) PARKING RE—STRIPPED FOR (N) AOA PARKING STALLS yyeuo 45-7 eK Il(` X4 24.4 I\I (E) PARKING UGHIING TO REMAIN, TYP. (N) TRASH ENCLOSURE At r xx C C C • rjn- (� 1 t C /) 4 4.4 O� 00 0 cCEIVED APR 302013 CON/II/10M i `i 1)L7VL_L.OIAMLNf 2410 0nieel Sgeeee loop Alemede, 81 04001 Tel 010 805 0003 Foe 510 000 1011 L/3 -alt QSITE & LANDSCAPING PLAN SCALE: 1'=20'-0' SCALE: 1'=20' 0 5 10 20 40' W U) cp z 0 01 0 z 0 a 0 U 0 0 o z LU < � J i0 a O w VJ PROJECT NUMBER 46997 SHEET NUMBER DR -01 SOUTHCENTER MALL PARKING ANALYSIS micaya.mALLARDI SGUTHCENTER MALL PARKING: DEPARTMENT STORES: SURFACE: 5,740 SPACES NORDSTROM 165,900 SF BUFFALO WILD WINGS: 239 SPACES MACY'S 250,407 SF PARKING GARAGE: SEARS 169,390 SF LEVEL 2 373 SPACES JC PENNY 240,600 SF LEVEL 3 413 SPACES DEVELOPER'S BUILDING 80,486 SF ROOF 204 SPACES SUBTOTAL: 906.783 SF T016L PARKING PROVIDED: 6.969 SPACES RETAIL LEVEL 1 460,720 SF LEVEL 2 131,686 SF LEVEL 3 73,404 SF PARKING RATIO = 4.2 STALLS PER 1,000 SF 5UBT0TAL: 665 810 SF 1,655,655 / 1,000 x 4.2 = 6,953.8 OUTPARCELS: ALL OUTPARCELS 83,062 SF PARKING REQUIRED: 6.954 STALLS SUEESBL 830625E TOTAL 1.655.655 SF , 4.4 O� 00 0 cCEIVED APR 302013 CON/II/10M i `i 1)L7VL_L.OIAMLNf 2410 0nieel Sgeeee loop Alemede, 81 04001 Tel 010 805 0003 Foe 510 000 1011 L/3 -alt QSITE & LANDSCAPING PLAN SCALE: 1'=20'-0' SCALE: 1'=20' 0 5 10 20 40' W U) cp z 0 01 0 z 0 a 0 U 0 0 o z LU < � J i0 a O w VJ PROJECT NUMBER 46997 SHEET NUMBER DR -01 4 1111111111111111111111111111116 0 0 0 0 00 Q .. NORTH ELEVATION U1 SCALE: I/8'=I'-0• 0 2 4 8 16 01 ¢-Ir 0- 1 1 0 ra • Q - BUFF. 0 V W LB ()WEST ELEVATION OL SCALE: I/8'=1'-0. 16' 03 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE'rI 1/8.-' 4r SCALE: 1/8.=1,-0.0 i1I2 4 8 16' ()EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8..1'-0• SCALE: l/8 -1'-0' 0 2 4 8 16' TCF I\IED APR 3 0' 2013 (,lJIJ11�1111Ji DI:VLLUf'MEN 1 LEGEND 1. METAL WILL P40/01110 0-' llCLL0'912 PAC-QA0 41.491 P4I41-11•. w WNW. (01.4IL2111. MATT[ 0400-66141 504 2 IRT& WNL AWEIMO 1-11010 011211 YPPI)flit-QIO BIWA. 16170_11•. OR APPROVED Em -ALM. BARN WAIT 00101601) -1115. 1 ET& WALL PAMLMC 0-.500910 Ar r04. w- 0 (OJIV O IT: 1AXEL-Ir w911 -X5005'0 E04VNEIIT. Ir 'Ir 4. E-N-w*11 4.10 514491 e91 S1d 66-4A 401.11/1 - LMIr CAM A COMM 0191L1411011 AIID 711191 5117104 (645) COL511 -OMI( )-GRAY. . 51300. 109STU19MAT MING MSI. 7. MAIM. OM mO - 90X0 - w7* BRIM 11 (1C 90-C) - MWYM/MIT9Q (AW( 195091. B. COMM 91 (11)10X ma -1191 STSTEY (ors) minx (L1) -1.119 1. SIFFFL tr1AX111 11241444140.3) 1011 cal l 1a 221M011 M9r4DOX &10 14491 S451Ew (OM AM aw BUM11. E>9 004071E-5E4E10 DDNiO 5011 4.194 '2 0(10)01 11011411 SCONCE > -4/412*1L OA94 EXMOOR *0 r WOMB L/3 -air' 7471 Y1111u Slue loop Allied', CO, 14511 lel 5111151107 1111)1IPS (ill z_ BUFFALO WILD w 0 z 0 1. 0 DESCRIPTION 0 Z PAI ( ) co��W/� o 0 I= (_ Q 0> cr W 6l W PROJECT NUMBER 46997 SHEET NUMBER DR -02 tn \\— JERSEY BARRIOR 4" IP G TUKWILA PARKWAY —ti -- I 0 o 588'38'00"W �— t 549 3_11 --- EX 26.15 p �'Y'�1i 6 _ - /� 26.1 % c IIRACTOR 10 COOR* r� 4.,,,.....,.,.u, 10 1 conn � r -/ k- / t t 1 Cb FIE HYDRANT 17 IF. 6• WA OUCVA _ CONNNECT TO EXSSG 3� =WA1ERi1AN` 1-6•X6• TEE THRUST BLOCIOIG r Q-------- CT TO -43611114 .141 CONNECT CONNECT TO.8' WATER1LW _-1._ TAP- _ -1-4 1/2" --WATER METER- - - W/ REDUCERS 1-1 1/2" RPBA _ II jI l----- \\� I BM 10; 11-----11-- j1 \ \ kaki TOP MI ti 1E' l�, 11 ELEV.= II I I III - i a . \ it 11 \I tT-1(, j1\ I II II ,I \ I _ �� ISI �3 - _-„-/ s\ _...A..--17 �.f Ii I -�� I I IL \ \ "0,'00 I — - u J P < p <I G to I < I� /. ' 'sci 025)840 TRANSFORMER/ID ' i IA / 15. 1 w r • GW LF. 6" WA DO5840 GAS MEIER TO BE UPGRADED, COORDINATE MLTH 1.111111 PINVEYOR 63 LF. 3• SS VERT 42 LF. 6 1• S' MAPLE J / L•al(P ri LJ 51TCCJ� \ 142 LF. Y DOIff17, \� ..... - / WATER SERVICE \ � 2KY WAR EASEMENT \� _- -" _�--_}==,_\ A -7 -ate/_.).)_-----V—,,,,,,- '_ --" I E t - —y 1 I :^ ▪ �\ • 1 I -, ! I \ i 4_ I L--- g& —G11 _� 0- / _ / P / 10" APLF/ ',S BE UPGRADED 8Y/PSE r, LJ /------V R 6.000 GALLON GREASE NTERCEPIOR REMOVE EI05TNG RAMP (C 26.27 i \ 254E / 7 0' 85 LF. 4. 5S AREA TO BE REPAVW AMD BEGRADDDLID MEET ADA RE / r l`___, L-1-1-71) \ __J aZ A2" 52' ,1, L1 / \\ \\ \ Y / \\ \\\L` RL' i Lr, LJ • J ri LJ 1\11E / i11 I V 1€8 RAMP TO WET ADA REQUIREMENTS . / / / / /( ./ \ C) \\ rJ LJ -- 6 Llb- --- -"�'--ii-qt y-= I O I I • O I 1- — r ,\ / --1 NEW ELECIRICA SERVICE 1- v VA _(/�j 6^ V/ GRAPHIC SCALE Vo a ( 01 PUT ) 1Lmh- 20 IL 26 -1M-M1-1111Mmr.-10-04 NOTES N87'25'1 526.1 `-_ - 1. ALL NM AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS ANO CODES AND 0.S.H.A STANDARDS 2. THE W%01 SHOWN 6 BASED UPON Of DICEEFR'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE OOSDNG CONOMNS. THIS PLAN 00ES NOT REPRESENT A DE1A1ED FEED SIDNEY. TLE 02511NG CCFDI110NS SOW ON 1115 PUN 4811 ARE BASED UPON DESIGN DATA PREPARED 8Y PACLALD, DATED 6/2/2010. AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED BY PACE. DATED 6/30/2008. RE CONTRACTOR 6 RESPONSIBLE FOR VERFYNG FEUD (0)011145 PRKIR TO BDONG Of PROPOSED STE VERIK 118'80 EMIOI1S E CO8UCTS ARE DISCOVERED. Tiff CONTRACTOR STALL NOW( 11E OUTER PRIOR TO NSTA.A110N O• ANY P0ROO4 CF TIE 91E WORN UCH WELD BE AFFECTED. F CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT COSTING SURVEY. INCLUDING TOPOGRAPHY. AS SHOW ON Of PUNS. MOW EXCEPTION, HE SHALL HAVE MADE. AT IIS OM EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A WO51065 LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO Of OWMER FOR REVEL 3. CAUTION - 6OHCS TO CONTRACTOR DE CONTRACTOR 6 SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/0R ELEVATION OF DOSING 1111/)105 AS 910114 DI DEE PLANS 6 BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS U1LT10S, AND MERE P3S96.E, IEASUROE01S TAKEN IN THE FELD. TIE NFORMARW 6 NOT TO BE 1 E1ID ON AS BEING EMU 0R CCIPUEIE THE CONTRACTOR MIST CALL 11E APPROPRIATE OUT( COMPANY AT UTAST 48 HOURS BUM ANY EXCAVAIDN TO REQUEST EXACT FEND LOCATION OF MUTES IT %ALL BE THE RES'ON5 J1Y OF TFE CONTRACTOR 10 RELOCATE ALE DEW U1011FS 1010(1)5184011)801008141584604 DEW CONFLICT IRE 114E PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CN 1T E PUNS 4. CON1RACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FCR CACI LOCATION AND MIDDENS KF VES1®ULE, 5.0PED MEG DOT PORCHES. 900NALN5 PRECISE BUONO 0110190145 AND (ACT BUSING UTUTY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS 5. DEMOS SOWN HtFETR TO FACE OF CUD. FACE OF BUSING OR 10 11ff 01116111E G= P6504541 STRIPING UNLESS OPERN% NOTED. 6. SEE AROIIECTURAL STE PLAN FDR 91E 018149045. , j ". � I ---.rilrrts' I I 1 BUILT ND SETBACK (TV.) I / 6 -_y ;2-71-_x} L 1 -1- J -_L -L _ 14 _ J _ :- _ _ - - — — c�T- ASPHALT 4:73.3r4- gr REDEVELOPMENT NOTE 114E TOTAL REPOSED IWFNMWS SURFACE AREA - APPRO9OIAIELY 5,800 SF. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES THESE WAN11TE9 ARE FOR GENERAL PURPOSES OIY AND DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR OVBRE CAVAINN DUE TO UNSUITABLE 915, UMW TRENCHES, OR PAVEMENT SECTIONS WT: 0CY FU• 50 CY NET: 50 CY F1L DATUM IDR6Z0NUL DATUMS 50) d RECORD OF SURVEY N SEC110N 23-23-04 BASS OF BEARINGS: HELD NO014'091 ALONG EAST WE OF SW j SE } 23-23-4 V4R11CAL DATUM: PER DOSING SURVEY BY APEX ENGINEERING %LEC UNDER FIE N0. 28368 DATED 6/11/04. SIEVED TO BE TO NOVO 1929 DATUM SITE DATA USE PROPOSED RESTAURANT . 2.99 AC BUILDING DATA APPROXIMATE EWNG AREA . 4451 SF SETBACKS PER TUC (11N(MWA URBAN CENTER) 201640 CODE FROM 15' REM - 10' 901 10' SEE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR PARKING DATA AND SITE DIMENSIONS Li LEGEND 51D. 06111 PAVEMENT (01061E PAVEMENT CONCRETE SDEW'ALK PAV0BNT CONCRETE CURB 0/r Know what's below. Call before you dig. 1411 brim Slum Uq IIndk, 8111511 141 11/101111 fill ill 111 1111 MEIMillAt I k _wn• V U `tea APR 30 2013 (;( )(JIlAUNI 1 ; /t V(.LU1WENT 0 '^ Q • C1'VJ m V Y Q Q m 6 JZ_5� f - Q `/\ Y5 7Y to i - CV Ulm D N W r LLJ D (1) (n z tz 0 a z 0 0 4 2 i 1.7 111: f5 11.4 011 E!1 -e TE I 18 PACLAND PROJECT NUMBER 30287005 SHEET NUMBER DR -03 i lb -Mt. Vernon Laurel Magic Carpet Spirea ..••••.1a••••aa•••••aa•...••a. Otto Luyken Laurel 1 -Mt. Vernon Laurel Little Bunny - Fountain Grass 1 -Mt. Vernon Laurel 1 -Mt. Vernon Laurel 1 -Mt. Vernon Laurel 7 -Mt. Vernon Laurel 7 -Mt. Vernon Laurel 1 -Mt. Vernon Laurel 1 -Mt. Vernon Laurel Existing street trees and planings to remain Little Bunny Fountain Grass Dwarf Burning Bush Dwarf Burning Bush Sod Lawn Little Bunny Fountain Grass Otto Luyken Laurel Repair disturbed plantings WILA PAR r WAY Preserve and protect existing street trees and lawn Sod Lawn aoa0ostrgaAQaaoaOa00041aasi*OV as LIt Karl Foerster Reed Grass Point Reyes Geanothus Magic Carpet Spire," Sweetgum ^ Little Bunny Fountain Grass Orchid Rockrose Lowfast Gotoneaster --- Sweetgum tie Sunny Fountain Grass Karl Foerster Reed Grass Point Reyes Geanothus Magic Carpet Spirea Lowfast Gotoneaster Lady Fern E'Vergor Sedge Otto Luyken Laurel Karl Foerster Reed Grass Preserve and protect existing plantings 4 top dress Dwarf Burning Bosh , ?Y ooo>S�ao_oeoeoaao_oyooraYGeP 'eaG(' � . v Magic Carpet Spirea Lowfast Gotoneaster Ex. Trees to Remain (Typ.) @`y Magic Carpet Spireo Point Reyes Geanothus Remove Ex sting Vegetation (Typ.) Orchid Rockrose Little Bunny Fountain Grass Orchid Rockrose Sweetgum OAP- C Little Bunny Fountain Grass FF=27.8 Little Bunny Fountain Grass Ex. Rockery to Remain (Typ.) Magic Carpet Splrea Orchid Rockrose Sweetgum Lowfast Gotoneaster EXISTING BUILDING FF=27.7 Lowfast Gotoneaster Magic Carpet-SSpirea Lowfast Gotoneaster Magas Carpet Spire," Sweetgum TAX PARCEL 3597000257 5weetglm FF=27.4 Magic Carpet Spire° Orchid Rockrose Sweetgum Sweetgum-------- Orchid Rockrose '----Exist g -Norway -Maple trees to remin, preserve and protect tree . minimizing disturbance (avol. grading and landscape ;mar.vements within eripline) Low Fast Gotoneaster' Sweetgum Evergold Sedge Lady Fern Ex. Rockery to Remain (Typ.) 17 -Mt. Vernon Laurel Little Bunny .Fountain Grass Landscape bould- s at end Islands A Otto Luyken Laurel Lowfast Gotoneaster) Sod Lawn E e -El- PLANT MATERIAL LIST Little Bunny Fountain Grass Sweetgum Lowfast Gotoneaster Orchid Rockrose Magic Carpet Spirea J r,: Orchid Rockrosex Llttle Bunny Fountain Grass Sweetgum Lowfast Gotoneaster Karl Foerster Reed Grass Little Bunny Fountain Grass A Norway Mottle Otto Luuken Laurel Blue Fescue 8 18" o.c. Point Reyes Geanothus Evergold Sedge Magic Carpet Spirea Landscape Boulders at End Islands (Typ.) to Prevent Vehicle Trespass w to r 4)'I W 00 0 .73 R J N 021 IT N QTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 4 SPACING 10 hCER Dl1=i:GC(2ANUK TR DCNT M,4T"LC 2" GAL., 10' 12' HT. Deb 10 ACER PLATINOIDES 'GOLUMNARE' NORWAY MAPLE 2" CAL., 12'-15' HT. B4B 33 LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA'FESTIVAL' AMERICAN SWEET GUM 2" CAL., 12'-I5' HT. 546 BLECHNUM SPICANT LADY FERN 5 GAL. CONT. (24" MIN. HT,) illg CALAMAGROSTIS 'KARL FOERSTER' 'KARL FOERSTER' REED GRASS 1 GAL. CONT. e 31'2' OC. CAREX 'EvERGOLD' EVERGOLD SEDGE I GAL. CONT. e 2' O.G. 284 CEANOT1-1U5 GLORIOSUS 'POINT REYES' POINT REYES CEANOTHUE 1 GAL. CONT. e 2' 'z' 0.C. 44 CISTUS PL'RPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE 5 GAL. CONT. (24" MIN. HT.) e 5' O.C. 122 COTONEASTER DAMMERI 'LOILFAST' 'LOWFAST' COTONEASTER I GAL. CONT. e 3'%' O.G. 25 E'JONTMUS ALATA 'COMPACTA' DWARF BURNING BUSH 5 GAL. CONT. (24" MIN. HT.) a 5' O.G. lip FESTUGA OVINIA GLAUCA BLUE FESCUE I GAL. CONT. e 18" O.C. (2_48) FEtNSETUM ALOFEG OIDE5'LITTLE 6U65(' LITTLE BUNNY FOUNTAIN GRASS 1 GAL. CONT. a 21%' 0.C. 270 PRUNUS LAUROCERA0U5 'MT. VERyGN' 'MT. VERNON' LAUREL 1 GAL. CONT. e 2' O.C. 138 PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS 'OTTO LUTKEN' 'OTTO LUYKEN' LAUREL 18" MIN. HT., BIB, (Spacing per plan) 294 SPIREA JAPONICA MAGIC CARPET' MAGIC CARPET SPIREA 2 GAL. CONT. (18" MIN. NT.) e 2119' O.C. SI-IEET NOTES Little Bunny Fountain Grass Point Reyes Geanothus Karl Foerster Reed Grass Point Reyes Geanothus Otto Luyken Laurel Karl Foerster Reed Grass Sweetgum I Mack Calvet Gaet ryplre n a 1wIPMINMIIP Little Bunny Fountain Grass Blue Fescue 8 Ib" o.c. Norway Maple Point Reyes Geanothus A\ 1. Refer to details and specifications for additional intormotion. 2. No plant substitutions shall be permitted without prior approval of Landscape Architect/Jwner. 3. AP work shell be performed to the satisfaction of the Landscape Architect/Owner. 4. Plant list quantities are shown tor reference only. Contractor is responsible for verifying 011 quantities in list with actual plan call -outs, and installhg plantings per the landscape plan. Groundcover quantities shall be adjusted os required for field conditions at the specified spacing. 5. All plants must be approved by Landscape Architect or Owner's representative prior to installation. Magic Carpet Spiree Otto Luyken Laurel ADDITIONAL NOTES (Per City comments) a. b. Pluming upas shall be tilled to a depth of of !coat 18 inches )erupt where doing w would impact root, or existing trees to till inthrce inures acompaat mxossail landscaped areas [except within the mut zone of existing tre01. Mulch is to be kept away hum wuudy seems and uruurts of pet -conic! plants. Planting pits must be only the depth of the existing root ball or else the bottom of the pLuning pits must be compacted prior w platting m inwn dwre i, su coling. Runt hallsof med and11011 lams must he Ia»ened and pruned as t ,w then art rat encircling awns r p' p p ve u rnx g poo w planting. N Icast the top Iwlfofburlap and coy win.naPs an w M rnnuveJ from Is&B Plans Prisms pleating. e. Where then arc existing traemms. incngarethe soil amendments by had. L/3i7 STATE OF WASHINGTON LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LICENSE N0.405 EXPIRES ON 02-062011 Lawn Edge ■ ANDOVER Norwal Maple NORTH 0 20 40 60' SCALE: 1"=20'-0" 2410 Y oilier Slime lull *loath, CA 14511 Tel 510 005 0003 Tet510 545 1111 BUFFALO WILD WINGS LOCATED AT: a r 55 rp LLJ CD z NQ 0 30 0 DESCRIPTION PLANNING SUBMUTAL 0 Z PROJECT NUMBER 46997 SHEET NUMBER DR -04 BUFFALO WILD WINGS 225 TUKWILA PKWY PL13-018 L13-018 DESIGN REVIEW E13-006 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director SEPA ADDENDUM TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE SOUTHCENTER MALL EXPANSION Description of current proposal: Build a new restaurant on an existing foundation at 225 Tukwila Parkway. A 7,039 square foot building with a 1,365 square foot enclosed patio will be built on the pre- existing foundation. Only minimal site work is proposed. The site work was done in 2009 and the site work and demolition were previously reviewed for environmental impacts under SEPA EIS addendum E09-017. The original EIS focused on the majority of development occurring on the south side of the main mall building. This addendum considers new development on the north end of the site. File number: PW13-018, E13-006 Proponent: Jared Taylor, Golden Property Development Location of current proposal: Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter is an 82 acre site located in the block bounded by Tukwila Parkway, Southcenter Parkway, Stander Boulevard and Andover Park West. I-5 and I-405 intersect near the northwest corner of the shopping center. This Addendum adds a new restaurant to an existing foundation following demolition of a former bank building. Development on the north end of the site was not considered in the original EIS. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Title of documents being added to: Draft Environmental Impact Statement issued by the City of Tukwila on June 21, 2004 and Final Environmental Impact Statement issued by the City of Tukwila on October 6, 2004. Date documents being added to were prepared: DEIS - June 21 2004; FEIS - October 6, 2004. If the documents being added to were challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: The DEIS and FEIS were not challenged. The document is available to be read at: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188, Monday thru Friday, 8:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report dated May 30, 2013, the lead agency has determined that there are no additional adverse significant impacts associated with the Buffalo Wild Wings development other than those that were identified and mitigated as part of the original DEIS and FEIS. This addendum adds information and analysis about a proposal but does not substantially change SM Page 1 of 2 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\E13-005 SEPA Addendum Decision.doc 06/05/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 the analysis of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing EIS prepared for expansion of Southcenter Mall. The DEIS and FEIS evaluated a total project build -out of 787,903 gross building square feet at the Southcenter Mall site, summarized potential environmental impacts, and identified possible mitigation measures for those impacts. To date, Westfield has built 453,149 square feet of space. With the Bank of America parcel redevelopment, no new square footage will be built but the existing building will add 8,717 square footage to the project for a total gain of 461,866 square feet. The square footage will remain under the total square footage evaluated in the FEIS. There are no changes to the project that are likely to have significant adverse impacts that were not adequately addressed in the environmental documents. Address: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100; Tukwila, WA 98188 Contact person: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Phone: 206 433 7166 Responsible official: Jack Pace, Director Signature: Phone: 206 431 3670 Date: 5;3_6D1.3 Statutory Authority: RCW 43.21C.110. 84-05-020 (Order DE 83-39), § 197-11-965, filed 2/10/84, effective 4/4/84. SM Page 2 of 2 06/05/2013 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\E13-005 SEPA Addendum Decision.doc asbestos -containing building material. The applicant will be subject to compliance with the rules regarding asbestos and demolition and will conduct asbestos abatement as necessary in all structures prior to demolition. No new impacts to air quality are expected under this addendum. Water Resources Storm Water The applicant will be required to comply with the storm water manual in affect when any applications are submitted and complete for that site. The addition of this building is not subject to the Development Agreement that covers the rest of the site. Plants and Animals The development of a new restaurant on an existing foundation should have no impacts to plants and animals. Transportation A Traffic Concurrency Certificate Application has been received from the applicant. A Traffic Concurrency Test Fee in order to receive a notice of Passing the Test prior to any development or building permit to be considered complete. Transportation impact fees apply to the future building permit for this project. Parking The DEIS stated that the proposed expansion did not provide adequate parking. The proponent would either increase parking supply on-site to meet code requirements for parking or would seek a parking variance to authorize the reduced parking supply. The applicant obtained a parking variance (L04-055 -- amended). This project will not impact the parking supply on the site. At the time of this application, the site has 6,928 parking stalls and requires 6,801 stalls with this application. Parking is met on the site under existing conditions. Solid Waste Westfield evaluated the waste associated with the proposed demolition of the bank building under E09-017. The demolition was considered in the SEPA addendum which will require safe removal of possible asbestos in the existing building. Construction of the new restaurant will generate construction waste but should have no long term significant impact. Archeological and Historical The subject site was completely paved in the late 1960s..This proposed plan won't require any excavation. There are records that show an important historical site along the river to the east of the project. To the north of the project site is a stream that leads to the archeological site along the river. If, through the course of the project, there is any uncovering of artifacts of archeological significance, existing City standards (18.50.110 TMC) stipulate procedures for archaeological conservation and preservation. Conclusion The City has reviewed the Westfield Expansion DEIS and FEIS (City of Tukwila, 2004) and the additional information provided by the applicant and determined that it, along with City staff analysis, is adequate in evaluating the impacts associated with including a new freestanding restaurant into the scope of the Final EIS. Related Information 1. SEPA Checklist (File E13-006, PW13-018) 2. EIS Addendum (File E09-017) 3. Initial DNS and Scoping Notice (File E03-010) 4. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter Expansion (City of Tukwila 6/2004) 5. Final EIS Westfield Shoppingtown Southcenter Expansion (City of Tukwila 10/2004) 6. Development Agreement (File DA07-003) 7. Parking Decision (File L04-055) 8. Parking Decision Amendment (File L04-055) 9. Westfield Expansion Development Permit (File D06-147, addendum J) 10. Parking Calculations 20130529 (2) SM Page 2 of 2 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\E13-006 SEPA Addendum SR.doc 06/05/2013 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director To: Jack Pace, SEPA Official Community Development Director From: Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner Date: 30 May, 2013 Subject: Westfield EIS Addendum to include a new restaurant on an existing foundation at a site on the northeast corner of the Westfield site. File No. E13-006, Staff Report Proposal Build a new restaurant on an existing foundation at 225 Tukwila Parkway. A 7,039 square foot building with a 1,365 square foot enclosed patio will be built on the pre-existing foundation. Only minimal site work is proposed. The site work was done in 2009 and the site work and demolition were previously reviewed for environmental impacts under SEPA EIS addendum E09-017. Location The parcel (359700-0257) that formerly housed the Bank of America is at 225 Tukwila parkways in the northeast corner of the Westfield property (Mall) and is bounded by Tukwila Parkway to the north and Andover Park West to the east. The original EIS did not include the 3 acre former Bank of America parcel from the Westfield property. The entire mall property is 82 acres and is bounded by Tukwila Parkway, Southcenter Parkway, Stander Boulevard and Andover Park West. Background The City of Tukwila was approached by the Westfield Company in 2003 regarding their proposal to expand their recently purchased facility, Southcenter Mall. On April 24, 2003 a Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice was issued. The focus of the EIS was on transportation, air quality and on the impacts on local government operations and services. A DEIS was issued in June 2004 and the FEIS was issued in October 2004. (File No. E03-010) Construction proceeded in 2005-2008 for a portion of the square footage that was analyzed in the EIS. A 2009 addendum added this parcel and the demolition of the existing building to the proposal and analysis. The following information supplements the information contained in the "SEPA COMPLIANCE DOCUMENT" prepared by Westfield and considers the impacts associated with the addition of a restaurant on this parcel. The applicant has listed mitigating measures in their SEPA checklist dated 04/26/14 associated with adding a new restaurant into their project. Findings The most recent use of this parcel is as a bank building and adjacent drive-through facility. The site has been vacant since July, 2009 when the bank relocated to a new building on the south side of the site. The pre-existing drive-through facility was demolished and redeveloped into 239 surface parking stalls as Phase 1. Phase 2 would have involved demolition of the existing bank building and development into an additional 103 stalls of surface parking. This proposal amends Phase 2; following demolition of existing bank site, the proposal would build a restaurant over the former bank's basement in lieu of creating 103 new surface parking stalls. The DEIS review evaluated expanding the size of the Mall by no more than 787,903 square feet to 2,226,274 square feet of gross building area (GBA) with the majority of the development occurring generally to the south. According to the plans provided, the mall area, after the addition of Buffalo Wild Wings, will be 1,655,655 square feet. This is well within the additional square footage considered in the EIS. The DEIS proposed a parking supply of 7,900 stalls. According to the plans provided, the Mall currently has 6,970 stalls (the plans say the BWW site has 239 stalls but the site plan shows 240 stalls, the SEPA checklist states 241 stalls -240 stalls were considered in this analysis). The total stall count is within the parking space impacts evaluated under the EIS. Air Quality Impacts to air quality were related to peak hour automobile traffic. For the EIS, a quantitative analysis concluded that the proposal would not likely exceed National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The proposed revisions associated with creating this restaurant building are within the square footage previously considered and should have little to no impact to air quality. Asbestos is listed as a potential contaminant on the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency web site. The SEPA EIS Addendum (E09-017) evaluated Demolition of the Bank of America building and discovered that the demolition could potentially lead to exposure of SM Page 1 of 2 H:\PL13-018 Buffalo Wild Wings\E13-006 SEPA Addendum SR.doc 06/05/2013 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 C*, of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 1/-24-1-3 Applicant Name: R411Lt) W WAS, td C. C/O GoLtet 1 I?2orQw iiVELeeti*Aft, LL A rr,u , ruca -ti9"na Street Address: tO Sou114 -QAJJ r ST City, State, Zip: SE V uu4 , C A °( S67 S Telephone: $OS - `NO - 7537 DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I.doc Page 1 Cis" of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 ✓ Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO — Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete H:Uand Use Applications in PDEISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc Page 2 of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question .1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) H:\Iand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 3 Cifi' of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 Ci • of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20I 1.doc Page 5 C'"-" of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: BUFFALO WILD WINGS 2. Name of Applicant: JARED TAYLOR 3. Date checklist prepared: 4/16/13 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NONE 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Agency Comments Page 1 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. BUILDING HEALTH 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIED BY "BANK OF AMERICA". THE EXISTING BUILDING PAD WILL REMAIN AND A NEW 7,039 SF BUILDING WITH 1,365 SF ENCLOSED PATIO WILL BE BUILT ON THE EXISTING PAD. THE NEW TENANT WILL A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT NAMED "BUFFALO WILD WINGS" 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 225 TUKWILA PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA 98188 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc Page 2 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: FLAT b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? < 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. SILTY CLAY, SAND, GRAVEL, WITH A LAYER OF PEAT VARIABLY BETWEEN 20 AND 40 FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A MODERATELY ACTIVE SEISMIC REGION THAT HAS HISTORICALLY EXPERIENCED MODERATE TO LARGE EARTHQUAKES. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NO FILLING OR GRADING IS PROPOSED H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20I 1.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 3 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NO CHANGE h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NONE 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. AIR EMISSIONS WILL BE PRIMARILY DUST FROM THE DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDING b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NONE H:\Land Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20I 1.doc Page 4 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NONE PROPOSED 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. THE GREEN RIVER IS TO THE EAST OF THE SITE. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. THE SITE IS OVER 200 FT FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WATERS 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l I .doc Page 5 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. NO 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. NO H:\Land Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. STORMWATER CONTROL AND COLLECTION IS EXISTING TO REMAIN 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NONE H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ✓ Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NONE c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: LANDSCAPING IS EXISTING TO REMAIN, ANY DISTURBED LANDSCAPING WILL BE REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING H:\ and Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20I 1.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. UNKNOWN d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ELECTRIC FOR APPLIANCES AND LIGHTING GAS FOR HEATING AND COOKING H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 9 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: LIGHTING CONTROLS, BUILDING INSULATION, LOW -E DOUBLE PANE GLAZING 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 10 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? LIGHT TRAFFIC 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION NOISE LONG-TERM RESTAURANT & BAR OPERATIONS 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: ENCLOSED PATIO 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? CURRENT USE IS BANK OF AMERICA b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc Page 11 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Describe any structures on the site. EXISTING 8,700 SF 1 -STORY BANK BUILDING d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? YES, THE EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? COMMERCIAL f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? TUKWILA URBAN CENTER g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 12 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 EMPLOYEES PER SHIFT j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NONE 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NONE H:Vand Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 13 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? TALLEST POINT OF BUILDING = 28'-0" PRINCIPAL BUILDING MATERIALS = METAL PANELS & EXTERIOR INSULATED FINISH SYSTEM b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NONE 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 15 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? TUKWILA PARK, ACME BOWLING b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NONE 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 16 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. INTERSTATE 405 AND TUKWILA PARKWAY TO THE NORTH SERVE AS ACCESS TO THE EXISTING SITE. NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? THE TUKWILA PKWAY & ANDOVER PARK W BUS STATION IS TO THE NORTH-WEST OF THE SITE, SERVING BUS LINES 128 & 150 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? THE EXISTING PARKING WILL BE RESTRIPED TO MEET CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS FOR A TOTAL OF 241 STALLS. NO STALLS WILL BE ELIMINATED. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 17 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. UNKNOWN. PEAK VOLUMES IN THE EVENING. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: (5) NEW BIKE PARKING STALLS 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 18 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: system other: ptic b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. UPGRADE EXISTING GAS METER, UPGRADE EXISTING TRANSFORMER, NEW GREASE INTERCEPTOR, NEW SEWER AND WATER CONNECTIONS H:V.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 19 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? N/A Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I.doc Page 20 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 21 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? N/A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/A D. SIGNATURE SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Date Submitted: Y- 2 G' H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 22 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (\Di_ APPLI CATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: �EC�'VEf File Number: E 13 . c Application Complete Date: --A 3+__1.13 Project File Number: PG13• Application Incomplete Date: � ; Other File Numbers: L/ — c)v l;c)t�ntnu,at t'MI=NT NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Buffalo Wild Wings LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 225 Tukwila Parkway, Tukwila, WA 98188 Nearest cross street - Andover Park West LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: '2.t `I'AYLO . Address: 1 C7 SO,T1A 6 ef4Arr S7- V.c.S6 u r t,.ta i c N 9567 Phone: _ t303- - 7537 FAX: E-mail:.54 P ' of C-t1at.0E,v P tom. Cort Signature: _ Ira.H:\ and Use Applications PDF\SEPA Environmt_._....,...,.. „pp, Date: Y- Z6 - c 3 a