The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIS 2021-07-12 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee ❖ Verna Seal, Chair ❖ De'Sean Quinn ❖ Thomas McLeod AGENDA Distribution: V. Seal D. Quinn T. McLeod K. Kruller C. Hougardy L. Humphrey H. Ponnekanti D. Nguyen (email) B. Still (email) City Attorney (email) Clerk File Copy Place pkt pdf on SharePoint: Z Trans & Infra Agendas email cover to: F. Ayala, A. Le, C. O'Flaherty, A. Youn, B. Saxton, S. Norris, L. Humphrey MONDAY, JULY 12, 2021 — 5:30 PM Virtual Meeting - Members of the public may listen by dialing 1-253-292-9750 and entering conference ID, 832324833# Click here to join the meeting ) Item Recommended Action Page 1. PRESENTATIONS 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a) Waste Management Service Discussion w/ Laura Moser a) Discussion only (L. Humphrey) b) Surface Water Fund — WRIA 9 Watershed Planning b) Forward to 07/26/21 Committee of Pg. 1 2021-2026, Resolution to Adopt (M. Perfetti) the Whole c) 2021 Overlay Program — 53rd Avenue S c) Discussion only Pg. 7 Widening Roadway for Two-way Travel (C. Knighton) d) Renewal of Recyclable Market Surcharge d) Forward to 07/19/21 Regular Pg. 13 (H. Ponnekanti) Consent Agenda e) BNSF Alternative Access Study (H. Ponnekanti) e) Discussion only Pg. 21 3. MISCELLANEOUS Future Agenda: Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, July 26, 2021 SThe City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance. City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Department - Hari Ponnekanti, Director/City Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer BY: Mike Perfetti, Habitat Project Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: July 9, 2021 SUBJECT: Surface Water Fund — WRIA 9 Watershed Planning 2021-2026 Project No. 91641205 Resolution to Adopt the WRIA 9 2021 Update to the Salmon Habitat Plan ISSUE Authorize a resolution ratifying the 2021 Update to the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed (WRIA 9) Salmon Habitat Plan: Making Our Watershed Fit for A King. BACKGROUND In 2004, The City of Tukwila entered an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with 15 other watershed jurisdictions. The WRIA 9 ILA was established to draft a habitat recovery plan to guide local jurisdictions in the recovery of threatened Puget Sound Chinook salmon. The initial plan was adopted by the City of Tukwila via Resolution 1595 in 2005. Since then, the City has been working to implement the plan, including the completion of the Duwamish Gardens Habitat Restoration Project, and is in the midst of construction for the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project. Two other projects identified in the original habitat plan — Gilliam Creek Fish Barrier Removal Project and the Nesen Side Channel project - are in the planning and design stages. These projects not only help to recover struggling salmon and other fish species, but provide public open space, water access, recreational and educational benefits to Tukwila residents. DISCUSSION The Salmon Habitat Plan Update represents the next chapter of salmon recovery efforts in watershed. It provides a science - based framework for identifying, prioritizing, and implementing salmon recovery actions over the next 10-15 years. The Plan Update integrates over a decade of new science and monitoring; provides updated habitat goals; outlines refined recovery strategies and embedded policies and programs; updates the capital projects list; and outlines a monitoring and adaptive framework for tracking implementation and making strategic adjustments. The plan does not obligate jurisdictions to complete any particular project or program, but rather is intended as a guidance document for use in habitat restoration efforts and in relevant City policy and code updates. FISCAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION The Committee is asked to make a recommendation on the draft resolution for discussion at the July 26, 2021, Committee of the Whole Meeting. Attachment: Draft Resolution Resolution 1595 https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2021 Agenda Items/TIC 07-12-21/a. WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan 2021 Update/Info Memo_WRIA 9 Habitat Plan Resolution Adoption_20210709.docx 1 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THE 2021 UPDATE TO THE GREEN/DUWAMISH AND CENTRAL PUGET SOUND WATERSHED, WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA-9) SALMON HABITAT PLAN, "MAKING OUR WATERSHED FIT FOR A KING." WHEREAS, the 2021 update to the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan ("WRIA 9 Plan") is an addendum to the 2005 WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, and includes new science, revised habitat goals and recovery strategies, an updated capital project list, and a monitoring and adaptive management plan; and WHEREAS, 17 local governments in WRIA 9 ("Parties") have partnered through an interlocal agreement (ILA) (2001-2006, 2007-2015, 2016-2025) to jointly fund development and implementation of the WRIA 9 Plan to address shared interest in and responsibility for long-term watershed planning and salmon recovery in the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed ("watershed"); and WHEREAS, in March 1999, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon evolutionary significant unit, including the Green River Chinook salmon population, as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, local jurisdictions have authority over some habitat -based aspects of Chinook survival through land use and other policies and programs; and the state and tribes, who are the legal co -managers of the fishery resource, are responsible for addressing harvest and hatchery management; and WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 partners recognize participating in the ILA and implementing priorities in the WRIA 9 Plan demonstrates their commitment to proactively working to address the ESA listing of Chinook salmon; and CC:\Legislative Development\WRIA-9 Salmon Plan update 6-7-21 MP:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 1 of 3 2 WHEREAS, coordination and cooperation among federal, state, and local agencies, tribes, businesses, non-governmental organizations, landowners, community members, and other interests are essential to implement and adaptively manage a salmon recovery plan; and WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Partnership serves as the Puget Sound regional organization and lead agency for planning and implementing the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan, approved by NOAA Fisheries; and WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Plan is one of 15 watershed -based chapters of the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan; and WHEREAS, the City supports cooperation at the WRIA level to set common priorities for actions among partners, efficient use of resources and investments, and distribution of responsibility for actions and expenditures; and WHEREAS, habitat protection and restoration actions to increase Chinook salmon productivity trends are necessary throughout the watershed, in conjunction with other recovery efforts, to avoid extinction in the near term and restore WRIA 9 Chinook salmon to viability in the long term; and WHEREAS, salmon recovery is interrelated with flood risk reduction, water quality improvement, open -space protection, recreation, economic development, and tribal treaty rights; and WHEREAS, the City has a strong interest to achieve multiple benefit outcomes for people and fish across the watershed; and WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Plan recognizes that salmon recovery is a long-term effort, and focuses on a 10 -year implementation time horizon to allow for evaluation of progress and adaptation of goals and implementation strategies; and WHEREAS, it is important to provide jurisdictions, the private sector and the public with certainty and predictability regarding the course of salmon recovery actions in WRIA 9; and WHEREAS, if insufficient action is taken at the local and regional level, it is unlikely Chinook salmon populations in WRIA 9 will improve and it is possible the federal government could list Puget Sound Chinook salmon as an endangered species, thereby decreasing local flexibility; and WHEREAS, the Parties previously took formal action to ratify the 2005 Salmon Habitat Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: CC:\Legislative Development\WRIA-9 Salmon Plan update 6-7-21 MP:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 2 of 3 3 The City hereby ratifies the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan Update, Making Our Watershed Fit for a King, dated February 2021. Ratification is intended to convey the City's support for the following: 1. Protecting and restoring habitat based on best available science with the intent to achieve sustainable, resilient, and harvestable populations of naturally spawning Chinook salmon. 2. Pursuing a multi -benefit approach to WRIA 9 Plan implementation that integrates salmon recovery, flood hazard reduction, water quality improvements, open space and recreation, and equity and social justice to improve outcomes for people and fish. 3. Utilizing the WRIA 9 Plan as a source of best available science to inform local government actions, including, but not limited to land use, shoreline, and transportation planning/permitting. 4. Utilizing capital project concepts, programmatic actions, and policies outlined within the WRIA 9 Plan to inform local priorities for implementation and funding via grants, capital improvements, ordinances, and other activities. Ratification does not obligate any partner to implement any specific actions or adhere to specific timelines for such actions. 5. Working collaboratively with local, state, and federal partners and tribes to support and fund implementation of the WRIA 9 Plan, including monitoring and adaptive management to address scientific uncertainty, tracking and communicating progress, and refining strategies to ensure cost-effective investments. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2021. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Kate Kruller, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney CC:\Legislative Development\WRIA-9 Salmon Plan update 6-7-21 MP:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Page 3 of 3 4 O' Q 1jj�U)i, t 1908 City of Tukwila Washington n Resolution No. 16 9,5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THE GREEN/DUWAMISH AND CENTRAL PUGET SOUND WATERSHED, WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA-9) SALMON HABITAT PLAN, "MAKING OUR WATERSHED FIT FOR A KING." WHEREAS, in March 1999, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon evolutionary significant unit as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, in November 1999, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed the Puget Sound bull trout distinct population segment as a threatened species under the ESA; and WHEREAS, significant areas of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9, are designated by the Federal government as critical salmon habitat; and WHEREAS, coordination and cooperation among Federal, state, and local agencies, tribes, businesses, non-governmental organizations, landowners, citizens, and other interests are essential to plan for and implement a salmon recovery plan; and WHEREAS, the City supports cooperation at the WRIA level to set common priorities for actions among partners, efficient use of resources and investments, and distribution of responsibility for actions and expenditures; and WHEREAS, 17 local governments in WRIA-9 entered into an interlocal agreement in 2001 to jointly fund development of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making our Watershed Fit for a King," published August 10, 2005; and WHEREAS, the WRIA-9 Salmon Habitat Plan, developed by a steering committee comprised of multiple interests, includes a wide variety of actions that focus on habitat recovery for Chinook salmon, bull trout, and other salmonids for the next ten years, and prioritizes them to guide efforts to recover the Green River Chinook salmon population; and WHEREAS, the WRIA-9 Salmon Habitat Plan is based upon a sound scientific foundation, and includes an adaptive management approach and funding strategy for implementation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City hereby ratifies the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making our Watershed Fit for a King," dated August 2005. Section 2. This resolution does not obligate the City Council to future appropriations beyond current authority. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY^O TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this 21 day of / V / Verr , 2005. ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: F ` A. ?VabAld -f 1 . /j%2 Pamela Linder, Council President Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA\Resolutions\WRIA-9 Salmon Plan.doc RL:ksn 11/17/2005 Page 1of1 5 6 City of Tukwila Man Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Deportment - Harr' Pon iekonti, Director/City Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager Scott Bates, Project Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: July 9, 2021 SUBJECT: 2021 Overlay and Repair Program — 53rd Avenue S Project No. 92110401 Widening Roadway for Two-way Travel ISSUE Provide an update on the 53rd Avenue S traffic revision and sidewalk plan, including widening the road to accommodate two-way travel. BACKGROUND In 2020, the engineer's estimate for widening 53rd Avenue S between S 137th Street and 52nd Avenue S for two-way traffic and adding sidewalks was $222,250, plus construction management costs. A barrier to this project was a guy pole that needed to be relocated by Seattle City Light (SCL) before widening for two-way traffic could commence. Due to these factors, this project was identified as cost prohibitive, and as an alternative, the decision was made to convert the roadway to a one-way northbound operation, while a new at -grade pedestrian walkway was installed. All construction was completed by City staff to reduce costs. During the April 12, 2021 Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee meeting, staff presented three options for Council consideration to improve pedestrian safety and vehicular access on this section of roadway. The Committee members were supportive of Option A, which included installation of raised sidewalks on the east side of the road, design for two-way traffic, and construction as soon as funding became available. DISCUSSION One June 17, 2021, negotiation with SCL came to a resolution and they are expected to remove their guy pole by July 12, 2021, allowing this project to move forward quickly. Due to this new development, the 53rd Ave S roadway widening plans were presented to Miles Resources, LCC, the construction contractor awarded the 2021 Overlay and Repair Program contract by Council on June 7, 2021, in the amount of $1,037,358.40 plus $51,867.92 in contingency. Using existing contract prices, Miles Resources, LLC estimates the road widening could be completed for approximately $50,000. Staff discussed the tremendous cost savings with Administration and the decision to move forward with the additional work was made on June 21, 2021, based on the Committee support from the April 12, 2021 meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT Widening of 53rd Avenue S is anticipated to add approximately $50,000 to the Miles Resources, LLC contact, after adding the additional work and subtracting known project under -runs. The current estimate falls within the contract contingency of $51,867.92. Contract Budget Miles Resources, LLC Contract $1,037,358.40 Additional Work for 53rd Ave S 50,000.00 Total $1,087,358.40 RECOMMENDATION Discussion only. Overlay & Repair Budget $1,100,000.00 ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Flow Map of 53rd Ave S Triangle 53rd Ave S Widening Plan 2021 Overlay Program Informational Memorandum, dated April 9, 2021 April 12, 2021 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee Meeting Minutes 2021 Overlay Program Informational Memorandum, dated May 21, 2021 7 EXISTING Vi�a, CONTRACk+ SIDEWALK(; AREA '1►r 1 _AIr n� 41111ir" ifito Cl�� • EXISTING CONTRACT OVERLAY AREA STA 30+23.60 22.75' LT .1. I 13619 53RD AV ES ST 30+50.00 / 15.32' LT i oa 5302 S 137TH ST NEW HMA DRIVEWAY (TYP) 4" DEPTH NEW PAVEMENT AREA 4" DEPTH STA 31+00.00 S szso 137TH ST 15.25' LT 3 + EXISTING CONTRACT SIDEWALK AREA 53RD AVE S NUMBER START STA NORTHING EASIING LENGTH BRNG/DELTA RADIUS PI STA TAN L8 30+00.00 178459.08 1285764.37 490.00' N 22'4811' W 8 b STA 31+50.00 15.18' LT 13535 53RD AVE S REMOVE AND RELOCATE PRIVATE LUMINAIRE ADJUST SEWER MANHOLE STA 32+00.00 15.10' LT RECONSTRUCT ROCKERY SCL VAULT AND POLE WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY SCL STA 32+50.03 15.03' LT PLAN ADJUST GAS VALVE STA 32+65.72 STA 32+99.98 C ' _w _ log WIx NW -- A 13600 53RD AVE S 0 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET ADJUST WATER VALVE (3) 13526 53RD AVE S 15.01' LT 13.47' LT STA 33+15.38 12.78' LT —MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT EDGE re 33+00 NEW OVERLAY AREA 2" DEPTH NEW 4" WHITE PAINT LINE ADJUST GAS VALVE 34+00 53RD AVE S NEW PLASTIC DOUBLE' YELLOW CENTERLINE STA 32+66.83 4.39' LT 2" HMA CL 3i" PG 58H-22 OVERLAY SECTION. 4" HMA CL Xz" PG58H-22 4" CSTC, IF REQUIRED TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION NTS 74, S1 © 34+9 ADJUST WATER VALVE 1350 53RD AVE S PUBLIC WORKS DE_P T_ *ENGINEERING*STREETS *WATER* SEWER* designed drawn checked by BMC MKE NM date 04/21 04/21 04/21 prof ene Proj air field bk no KPC4 Interdisciplinary Design 3131 Elliott Ave 2502 Jefferson Ave Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98121 (2061286.1640 Tacoma, WA 98402 (253)627-0720 www.kpg.com BID DOCUMENTS 2021 OVERLAY PROGRAM 53RD AVE S WIDENING 6/22 FIELD WORK DIRECTIVE #1 19 121J file no 2013953RDWIDENINCDW0 scale 1 = 40 no date revisions dat8 06/2020 / City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Department - Hari Ponnekanti, Director/City Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director BY: Scott Bates, Project Manager CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg DATE: April 9, 2021 SUBJECT: 2021 Overlay Program- 53rd Ave S Sidewalk Addition Project No. 92110401 ISSUE Provide an update on the 53rd Ave S traffic revision and sidewalk plan. BACKGROUND In 2020, the City desired to improve pedestrian safety on the 53rd Ave S between S 137th St and 52nd Ave S. The existing roadway was not wide enough to safely accommodate two-way traffic and pedestrians. With limited funding, the City Street division was utilized to install a new at -grade pedestrian walkway on 53rd Ave S and revise the traffic direction to one-way northbound. At the same time, 52nd PI S was changed to one-way southbound. While pedestrian safety was greatly improved, the one-way street revision created substantial concerns with some residents. Staff was requested to look at options for improvement and report back to the Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee. ANALYSIS Staff, along with consultant support from KPG, have been considering multiple options to improve the current conditions. With the funding restored to the 2021 Overlay Program, a raised sidewalk along 53rd Ave S and S 137th St is scheduled to be constructed in the Summer of 2021. Per the current design, the traffic on 52nd PI S would be returned to one-way northbound operation per the community's request. Ultimately, the best solution would be to resume two-way traffic on 53rd Ave S. KPG is working on a low-cost solution for restoring two-way traffic in conjunction with the sidewalks, which would widen the roadway to the west. The need to coordinate with Seattle City Light for a pole relocation will likely prevent the work from being included this summer and will be dependent upon funding availability. Additional options for discussion: 1. Option A: Add the sidewalks, keep 53rd Ave S as one-way northbound, return operation on 52nd PI S to northbound and construct in Summer 2021. Design the 53rd Ave S widening for two-way traffic and construct as soon as funding is secured. Cost estimate is under development. 2. Option B: Add the sidewalks, keep 53rd Ave S as one-way northbound, return operation on 52nd PI S to northbound and construct in summer 2021. No widening pursued. 3. Option C: Add the sidewalks, revise 53rd Ave S as one-way southbound, revert the direction on 52nd PI S to northbound and construct in summer 2021. This option will cost more than #2 due to relocating the current signs. Additional traffic issues may appear despite traffic control efforts. FISCAL IMPACT Cost estimates still being developed. RECOMMENDATION Staff was requested to present this item for discussion to update the Council about the 53rd Ave S sidewalk project progress. With recent and continued comments from the area residents, we now recommend pursuing option A, which will provide the best solution for the community. Attachment: Plan sheet design for 53rd Ave S sidewalk 9 C:1Userslcyndy1AppDatalLocal\MicrosohlwindowsllNetCache\Content.0utlook\SCH3K9lN11nfo Memo 53rd Sidewalk Update 04092021.docx City of Tukwila City Council Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2021- 5:30 p.m. - Electronic Meeting due to COVID-19 Emergency Councilmembers Present: Verna Seal, Chair, De'Sean Quinn, Thomas McLeod Staff Present: Rachel Bianchi, Emily Miner, Eric Compton, Gail Labanara, Scott Bates, Hari Ponnekanti, Brittany Robinson, Adam Cox Guest: Haran Rashes, Rachel Fenton, Zak Kennedy, Joel Bush, Matthew Bates Chair Seal called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. I. BUSINESS AGENDA A. 53rd Avenue South Traffic Revision Update and Sidewalk Plan Staff is developing cost estimates to add sidewalks, keep 53" Ave S as one-way northbound, return 52' Pl S to northbound and design 53' Ave S widening for two-way traffic for construction when funding becomes available. Committee members expressed support for this option. Item(s) requiring follow-up: Continue close communication with neighborhood. Committee Recommendation Discussion only. Return to committee. B. Ordinance and Resolution: Interim Small Wireless Facilities Code Staff is seeking Council approval of an ordinance that would adopt an emergency interim code to regulate Small Wireless Facilities and a resolution to update the Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule accordingly. Committee Recommendation Unanimous approval. Forward to April 12, 2021 Committee of the Whole and Special Meeting. II. Miscellaneous Staff will present a State of the Bridges Report at a future meeting. The meeting adjourned at 5:57 p.m. Committee Chair Approval Minutes by LH 10 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Puf is ilt'orks Department - Hari Pennckarrti, Director/My Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer BY: Scott Bates, Project Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: May 21, 2021 SUBJECT: 2021 Overlay and Repair Program Project No. 92110401 Bid Award ISSUE Award the bid for construction of the 2021 Overlay and Repair Program. BACKGROUND The Overlay and Repair Program preserves and maintains the street structure in a safe and useable condition. Construction will include pavement repairs and an asphalt overlay at seven locations citywide, new raised sidewalk sections on 53rd Ave S and S 137th St, and a new Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon at the crosswalk near Thorndyke Elementary School at 46th Ave S. In a separate but related project, City crews will be adding speed cushions to the Thorndyke school zone on 5.150th St as well as on S 37th St near S.140th St in the Cascade View neighborhood. The cushions were purchased in 2019. ANALYSIS A call for bids was advertised for the 2021 Overlay and Repair Program on May 4 and May 11, 2021. Three bids were opened on May 18, 2021. The confirmed lowest bidder was Miles Resources, LLC. with a bid of $1,037,358.40. The Engineer's Estimate was $1,079,420. There were no bidding errors. FINANCIAL IMPACT AND BID SUMMARY (All amounts include sales tax) Bid Results Engineer's Estimate 2021 Budget Miles Resources, LLC $1,037,358.40 $1,079,420.00 $1,050,000.00 Contingency (5%) $51,867.92 Unused CM/PE $50,000.00 Total $1,089,226.32 $1.079.420.00 $1.100.000.00 The KPG supplemental contract for construction management is $50,000.00 less than the available budget and the remaining funds will be reallocated to the construction phase. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to award construction of the 2021 Overlay and Repair Program to Miles Resources, LLC. in the amount of $1,037,358.40 and to consider this item on the Consent Agenda of the June 7, 2021 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS • Vicinity Map • 2021 CIP Page 12 • Bid Tabulation W:\P W Eng \PROJECTSW- RW & RS Projects\Annual Overlay & Repair Programs\2021 Overlay & Repair Program (92110401)\DesignWd and Award Award \Does to TIC Bid Award\Pinal Docs to TIC20210vcrlayBidAward.docx 11 12 TO: FROM: CC: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Warks Department - Hod Ponnekrznti, Director/City Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer Mayor Allan Ekberg July 9, 2021 Renewal of Recyclable Market Surcharge Contract No. 12-027 ISSUE Waste Management (WM) is the solid waste and recycling provider in the city of Tukwila. WM requests that the city renew the 5% Commercial Recycling surcharge for two more years - beginning November 1, 2021 and ending October 31, 2023. BACKGROUND: Recycling Costs Waste Management (WM) presented to the Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee in May 2019 regarding changes in the global recycling market resulting in increased costs. To offset the additional costs associated with recycling, WM initially requested an increase to the recycling rates. On [insert date] City Council approved two-year 5% Commercial Recyclable Cost surcharge, which went into effect on November 1, 2019. The surcharge was approved to be in place for two years, beginning November 1, 2019, and the parties agreed it could be extended by Council upon written request and clear justification from WM. DISCUSSION: Renewal of the Recycling Surcharge due to continued Recycling Costs WM has submitted the request for extending this 5% recycling surcharge for the rest of their contract, which is set to expire October 2023, due to continued operational costs in the global recycling market. Please see attached information to this extent. FINANCIAL IMPACT The proposed recycling surcharge only applies to commercial users, not residential. Even with the proposed increases, the solid waste and recycling rates remains below Tukwila's neighboring cities. The proposed surcharge would be in place for two more years, beginning November 1, 2021, and ending October 31, 2023. RECOMMEDATION Staff reviewed the material submitted by WM about the operational costs in the global recycling market. Staff agrees that this information is similar to the information submitted in May of 2019, when the Council approved the 5% Commercial Recyclable Cost surcharge to offset WM's costs associated with the weakening recycling market. Council is being asked to consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the July 19, 2021 Regular Council Meeting. Attachments: Letter of Understanding Letter from WM requesting the 5% surcharge for the next 2 years Financial Analysis of 5% Surcharge Extension Current Municipal Contract rates Tukwila City Han • 62ooSnuthceraterBoulevard . Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwiliWA.gav 13 July 12, 2021 Laura Moser Public Sector Manager Waste Management of Washington, Inc. 720 4th Avenue, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Letter of Understanding: Extension of Recyclable Market Surcharge - Comprehensive Garbage, Recyclables and Compostables Collection Agreement dated March 13, 2012, as amended Dear Ms. Moser, The purpose of this Letter of Understanding ("LOU") is to extend the recyclable market surcharge between the City of Tukwila ("City") and Waste Management of Washington, Inc. ("WM"). The City and WM executed Agreement No. 12-027, Comprehensive Garbage, Recyclables and Compostable Collection Agreement dated February 21, 2012 ("Agreement"). Pursuant to Letter of Understanding between the Parties dated June 4, 2019 and signed July 23, 2019, City and WM agreed to increase commercial rates by five percent (5%), effective November 1, 2019, to reflect increased costs in recyclables processing and marketing. This surcharge was only approved for a period of two years; however, WM was permitted to seek an extension of the surcharge for an additional two years by providing justification of the need to the City. WM has submitted a written request for an extension of the surcharge, and justification of the need to continue the surcharge. The purpose of this LOU is to confirm the City's approval of WM's request for extension of the surcharge for an additional two years, starting on November 1, 2021, ending on October 31, 2023. Page 1 of 2 14 By signing below, the City and Waste Management acknowledge their approval and acceptance of the terms of this LOU and acknowledges that this LOU: (a) creates a legally binding obligation upon the parties, (b) shall be governed and constructed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington regardless of any conflict of law provisions, (c) sets forth the entire agreement between the City and WM with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, understandings and agreements with respect to the subject matter hereof, and (d) may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Signatures transmitted electronically shall be deemed valid execution of this LOU and binding on the parties. Acknowledged and agreed upon by: CITY OF TUKWILA: By: Printed Name: Title: WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WASHINGTON, INC: By: Printed Name: -111 Title: Date Signed: '111." -- AF4\ Page 2 of 2 Date Signed: 15 June 11, 2021 Mr. Hari Ponnekanti Public Works Director City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Sent via email only to: Hari.Ponnekanti@tukwilawa.gov RE: Recyclable Market Surcharge expiring October 31, 2021 Dear Mr. Ponnekanti, WASTE MANAGEMENT 720 41h Ave, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 The purpose of this letter is to request another 2 -year term for the Recyclable Market Surcharge set to expire 10/31/21. We understand the request must be made no later than 90 days prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by documentation justifying the request. Since November 1, 2019 when the increase became effective, we have continued to see fluctuating commodity markets and increased processing costs. Over the past 18 months (October 2019 through April 2021) our processing costs have increased to $136.46 per ton and commodity values have gone up and down with an average $26.60 per ton. Based on the commercial and multifamily tons WM collects, processes, markets for City of Tukwila customers our costs have increased 6.9% over this time frame. Attached is documentation showing the data for the basis of our request and justification. Therefore, we are asking that the current 5% recycle surcharge remain in place for another two-year period (11/1/2021 through 10/31/2023). Even though realistically, this does not cover our costs and is applied to the collection portion only and not the total rate for commercial and multifamily. WM appreciates your consideration of our request and looks forward to your response. As always, I am available to answer any questions you may have. Sincerely, Laura Moser Public Sector Manager (206) 391-9112 Lmoser@wm.com Attachments: 1). Financial Analysis for extension of 5 percent surcharge_061121_City Copy 2). Current Municipal Contract Rates_City Copy 16 Tukwila Recycling Tonnage and Revenue Tons Tons Tons Average Col E multiply Col D Commercial MF Total Value Revenue Oct, '19 372.4 46.3 418.7 $ 10.46 $ 4,380 Nov 325.5 44.2 369.7 $ 13.13 $ 4,854 Dec 343.0 52.5 395.5 $ 4.82 $ 1,906 Jan 384.4 52.3 436.7 $ 10.41 $ 4,546 Feb 322.6 40.5 363.1 $ 11.09 $ 4,027 Mar 317.0 39.1 356.1 $ 5.07 $ 1,805 Apr 259.7 35.0 294.7 $ 7.09 $ 2,089 May 264.5 36.0 300.5 $ 13.53 $ 4,066 Jun 300.8 41.1 341.9 $ 10.99 $ 3,757 Jul 317.1 39.0 356.1 $ 10.54 $ 3,753 Aug 298.4 38.7 337.1 $ 18.64 $ 6,284 Sep 326.5 43.4 369.9 $ 25.42 $ 9,403 Oct. '20 331.2 45.8 377.0 $ 35.53 $ 13,395 Nov 350.0 49.7 399.7 $ 42.32 $ 16,915 Dec 363.1 52.0 415.1 $ 50.00 $ 20,755 Jan 373.2 53.2 426.4 $ 47.62 $ 20,305 Feb 300.5 44.8 345.3 $ 51.27 $ 17,704 Mar 368.8 52.0 420.8 $ 54.24 $ 22,824 Apr 361.4 47.0 408.4 $ 66.07 $ 26,983 Total 6,280.1 852.6 7,132.7 $ 26.60 $ 189,752 Commodity Value Ql 2018 Commodity Revenue Lost since LOU signed Increase in Processing Fees since LOU signed Total Total 2020 Com'I/MF Billed Revenue 7,132.7 $ 47.92 $ 341,799 (+E27*D27) $ 152,047 (F25 -F27) $ 141,370 See Tab 'Processing Cost Increase' Cell E16 $ 293,417 (F31+F29) $ 4,226,753 Combined % increase in processing cost and revenue lost 6.9% 17 China Sword Impact - Multifamily & Commercial Municipality: Tukwila WM MRF Used: JMK 1. Increased MRF Processing Costs Explanatory Notes a Previous WUTC Processing Cost per Ton $ 116.64 Per May 2018 WUTC tariff forMMK b Current WUTC Processing Cost per Ton $ 136.46 Per Seattle/SS 2021 rate case c Increased Cost per Ton $ 19.82 [ b - a ] d Annual Multifamily & Commercial Recycling Tons 7,133 2020 actual multifamily & commercial recycling tons e Total Increased Processing Cost - MF & CM $ 141,370 [cxd] 18 Current Municipal Contract Rates - Residential Tukwila WM (11/1/2012 contract started) Burien Recology (6/1/2014 contract started) Des Moines Recology (11/1/2011 contract started) Newcastle WM (3/1/2019 contract started) Renton Republic (11/1/2016 contract started) SeaTac Recology (10/1/2013 contract started) Federal Way WM (9/1/2020 contract started) Tukwila vs. Burien higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Des Moines higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Newcastle higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Renton higher/lower) Tukwila vs. SeaTac higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Federal Way higher/(lower) 20 -gallon $8.92 $19.04 $17.51 $31.78 $14.31 $16.49 $16.35 -53% -49% -72% -38% -46% -45% 35 -gallon $13.10 $25.98 $23.05 $38.78 $23.58 $21.23 $21.46 -50% -43% -66% -44% -38% -39% 64 -gallon $20.68 $36.70 $34.42 $48.20 $41.28 $28.96 $31.39 -44% -40% -57% -50% -29% -34% 96 -gallon $28.28 $47.36 $45.75 $60.18 $60.95 $41.08 $46.26 -40% -38% -53% -54% -31% -39% Current Municipal Contract Rates - Commercial 19 Tukwila WM (11/1/2012 contract started) Burien Recology (6/1/2014 contract started) Des Moines Recology (11/1/2011 contract started) Newcastle WM (3/1/2019 contract started) Renton Republic (11/1/2016 contract started) SeaTac Recology (10/1/2013 contract started) Federal Way WM (9/1/2020 contract started) Tukwila vs. Burien higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Des Moines higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. New Castle higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Renton higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. SeaTac higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Federal Way higher/ (lower) 1 Yard Weekly $73.27 $95.91 $109.60 $124.59 $113.98 $110.34 $117.37 -24% -33% -41% -36% -34% -38% 1.5 Yard Weekly $102.24 $138.84 $159.83 $171.13 $156.24 $148.32 $157.26 -26% -36% -40% -35% -31% -35% 2 Yards Weekly $125.72 $178.41 $207.03 $215.24 $196.97 $190.75 $197.27 -30% -39% -42% -36% -34% -36% 3 Yards Weekly $179.84 $257.57 $301.44 $316.37 $280.25 $272.80 $277.83 -30% -40% -43% -36% -34% -35% 4 Yards Weekly $234.24 $316.59 $389.78 $388.06 $363.40 $355.01 $350.32 -26% -40% -40% -36% -34% -33% 6 Yards Weekly $331.40 $454.79 $566.45 $536.32 $527.26 $507.01 $500.51 -27% -41% -38% -37% -35% -34% 8 Yards Weekly $434.03 $579.54 $730.97 $673.57 $690.15 $665.35 $632.80 -25% -41% -36% -37% -35% -31% 19 20 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Publ'ic Works Department - Marr P€x nekarrtr„ Director/City Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg DATE: July 9, 2021 SUBJECT: BNSF Alternative Access Study Project No. 99510409 EIS Process Budget, Schedule, and Next Steps ISSUE Information regarding the BNSF Alternative Access Study Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process, identifying budget sources, outlining consultant selection process, and project schedule. Staff is requesting direction on a funding path to implement a Term -Limited Project Manager to manage the EIS process and the EIS consultant qualification request. BACKGROUND On June 14, 2021, at the Committee of the Whole Meeting, Council directed Public Works staff to proceed with staff recommended Options 1 and 2, which include updating costs estimates and a full EIS review of all alternate routes. Option 1: Update Previous Cost Estimates: Estimated cost is $15,000 to $50,000 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will be approximately $15,000 to $50,000. Option 2: EIS on all alternatives: Estimated cost is $750,000 to $900,000 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact application process is approximately $750,000 to $900,000. The cost would depend on the scope, such as the number of route alternatives (or the number of environmental elements) selected for review. The estimated timeline for completing this EIS is 18 to 24 months. This EIS would be useful only for a certain period of time and depending on when funding was secured (if several years later due to Federal or State funding availability), it may need to be updated (supplemented) for an additional cost. A full EIS or partial EIS will both require the City to hire a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. This brings the total estimated costs up to $1.2 million dollars for the EIS and City staff requirements. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") on all four alternative routes as compared to the status quo I "no action" alternative is recommended prior to choosing a preferred route. An EIS is intended to be an impartial tool to identify and analyze probable adverse environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and possible mitigation for the impacts. An EIS is required when significant adverse environmental impacts are likely from a project, such as here, where two of the alternatives involve a new bridge across a salmon bearing river. If a full scope EIS is undertaken, all of the alternatives in the 2016 Draft BNSF Access Study would be analyzed, including the following four alternatives along with the status quo (S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge). 1 Airport Way S. 3 Gateway Drive - north leg 2 S. 112th Street 4 48th Avenue S. 21 Map of the study area and alternatives routes Uninc. King . 6 't� Environmental Elements Considered for EIS Analysis 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land and Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light and Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities Phone; 206-433-1800 • Email; Mayor TukwilaWA,gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 22 Scoping is the first step in the EIS process. The purpose of scoping is to narrow the focus of the EIS to significant environmental issues, eliminate insignificant impacts from detailed study, and identify alternatives to be analyzed in the EIS. Scoping also provides notice to the public and other agencies that an EIS is being prepared and initiates their involvement in the process. The result of the scoping process might be a reduced number of access alternatives and/or environmental elements to be studied. While a narrower document will reduce costs, one that does not fully consider environmental impacts may be more vulnerable to legal challenge. DISCUSSION EIS Schedule Staff outlines the following schedule: 3rd Quarter of 2021 Identify Project Funding 3rd and 4th Quarter of 2021 Hire Term -Limited Project Manager 4th Quarter of 2021 Begin monthly progress meetings with the Allentown Community 1St Quarter of 2022 Start Request for Qualifications process for EIS consultant, select consultant, and bring contract to Council for approval 2nd Quarter of 2022 Start the EIS 4th Quarter 2023 Complete the EIS and report to Council and the Allentown Community Funding Sources The first step in the EIS schedule and process for the BNSF Alternative Access Study is to identify funding sources. Staff has identified five options for potential funding sources for this project: 1. Transfer unused funds from the 42nd Ave South Bridge Replacement Project design phase after utilizing the PSRC contingency grant funds. 2. Use ending fund balance from the general fund. (For example in 2020, we ended the year with over $1 million above our required reserves.) 3. Reallocate a portion of the Solid Waste Utility Tax for year 2022 and 2023 to this project. 4. Move/prioritize funds from other CIP projects during the next budget amendment process to provide a clear funding path for the BNSF Alternative Access Study EIS process. 5. Issue an Infrastructure Bond for the BNSF Alternative Access Study Project costs and take advantage of the low-interest rate. The Bond can be repaid over several years. FINANCIAL IMPACT The overall staffing and consultant costs were in the range of $900,000 - $1,200,000. The interest payment cost will depend on the options chosen from above. Final direction on the funding choices above should be included in the budget amendment process. Staff will proceed hiring a Term -Limited Project Manager to complete the consultant qualification request and EIS process. The project will start incurring costs in the beginning of 2022. RECOMMENDATION Discussion only. Attachments: Transportation & Infrastructure Services Meeting Info Memo- Dated May 21, 2021 Council of the Whole Meeting Minutes- Dated June 14, 2021 Phone; 2O6-433-1200 • Email: Mayor@TukwillaWA.gov + Website: TukwiilaWA.gov 23 City of Tukwila Allan viayar I5ILiVi u Die.LILTIIFti.:1u - 6•kanI MI+•I Year.yl.irr ina1IFIwi1T INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg DATE: May 21, 2021 SUBJECT: BNSF Alternative Access Study Project No. 99510409 Project Update and Next Steps ISSUE Information regarding the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study. BACKGROUND The purpose of this memorandum is to share history and information regarding alternatives for a new truck traffic route into the BNSF intermodal yard to relieve truck traffic from the Allentown neighborhood ("the Project"). While the Tukwila City Council has been considering access alternatives for the BNSF intermodal yard since the late 1990's, no preferred alternative route has been selected. The goal of an alternative route has always been to improve the quality of life for residents in the Allentown, Duwamish and surrounding areas, which are impacted by the estimated 3,000 trucks per day (of the total 10,000 vehicles per day) which use the current route (status quo) on S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge to access the BNSF intermodal yard. These trucks impact air quality, noise, and the safety of residents. A common goal is to move this truck traffic out of the residential area. Selecting and creating an alternative route into the BNSF intermodal yard has several challenges due to overall costs, lack of funding options for an alternative route, environmental concerns and potential litigation. Immediately below is a historical timeline of events related to consideration of alternative routes. This timeline is based on available records and remembrances of those involved. I. Historical Alternative Route Consideration Timeline As shown below, in 1997, the City of Tukwila began studying access alternatives to the BNSF Intermodal Facility. Date Activity 1997 • Hanson & Wilson Co. Access Study for BNSF 1998 • Harding Lawson Associates Study 2000 • Cooper Consulting Engineering Study (because previous two studies presented substantially different capital estimates) May 2011 • City Council adopted Res 1741 opposing federal pre-emption relating to railroads • Council Member (CM) Hougardy met with Port Commissioner Tarleton to discuss BNSF expansion concerns • City met with BNSF to discuss alternate access • City sent letter to BNSF discussing lack of financial assistance, deterioration of 42nd Ave Bridge from truck traffic • BNSF response letter offering further discussions but no specifics https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2021 Agenda Items/TIC 05-24-21/g. BNSF Alternate Study/info memo BNSF alternatives 05072t.docx 24 Date Activity July 2011 • • City met with BNSF to clarify understandings and address neighborhood concerns, Council Members (CMs), Ball Janik (Federal Lobbyist) and reps from Senator Murray, Senator. Cantwell, Congressman Smith in attendance City met with Allentown residents August 2011 • BSNF letter to city proposing to meet every six months and asserting no plans for expansion (follow up meetings were not made) February 2012 • City met with Ball Janik (Federal Lobbyist) to discuss BNSF and Strander Blvd Ext May 2012 • DC trip to meet with reps from Surface Transportation Board July 2012 • City met with BNSF followed by letter to Sen. Cantwell August 2012 • Allentown residents give public comment opposing alternative route on 115th/116th November 2012 • City met with BNSF April 2013 • • • City Council discussed BNSF Railyard City met with BNSF and Ball Janik to discuss engineering options, 30% design, EIS, cost sharing, pursuit of TIGER (Federal grant opportunity), neighborhood livability Council's CAP Committee discussed scope of work for neighborhood livability study May 2013 • City met with BNSF June 2013 • Council added BNSF Regional Access Center to Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) August 2013 • City Council discussed options for study/report for Allentown and BNSF intermodal facility October 2013 • City receives Request for Proposal (RFP) from BNSF on southern access alternatives for review March 2014 • City met with BNSF April 2014 • City forms internal working group of staff and three CMs May 2014 • • BNSF group meets with Allentown residents on draft Request for Quote (RFQ) for livability Mayor and CMs meet with Murray, Cantwell and Smith in DC June 2014 • • City talked with Smith office about cooperative funding agreement BNSF group met with Allentown residents July 2014 • • BNSF Workgroup Tour arranged by Ball Janik Cooperative Funding Agreement with BNSF for alternative access study November 2014 • • Neighborhood canvassing re: livability City Council discussion on draft scope of work for BNSF Facility Access Study March 2015 • Contract with David Evans and Associates for BNSF Facility Access Study August 2015 • Council briefed on progress of BNSF study - August 10, 2015 Council of the Whole (C.O.W.) December 2015 • Council briefed on progress of BNSF study - December 14, 2015 C.O.W. March 2016 • BNSF Access Study Open House (Tukwila Community Center and Online) November 2016 • BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study — Draft Alternative Screening Analysis Report November 28, 2016 December 2016 • Draft Study findings transmitted to City Council March 2017 • City met with BECU to discuss their concerns with the Gateway Drive alternative Phone; 24D6-433-1800 Email: Mayor@TukwitaINA.gov • Website: T kwiIa Nt ov 25 Date Airport Way S. 3 Activity May 2017 S. 112th Street • Notice of SEPA Application issued with comment period ending - June 2, 2017 August 2017 • Open House — Preferred Alternative Outreach -. August 17, 2017 September 2017 • Bob Giberson retires; Robin Tischmak becomes Interim Public Works Director January 2018 • Henry Hash becomes Public Works Director March 2019 • Great Northern Corridor Coalition (GNCC) Meeting and Tour of the BNSF South Seattle Intermodal Facility. March 27, 2019 June 2019 • • TIS Committee discussed project and sent to C.O.W. Councilmembers toured BNSF facility October 2019 • CM Kruller toured BNSF facility with NLC's Brittney Kohler July 2020 • Hari Ponnekanti named Interim Public Works Director February 2021 • Hari Ponnekanti appointed Public Works Director May 2021 • Council's Transportation and Infrastructure Committee agenda item June 2021 • Public open house to be held II. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS In 2015, the City of Tukwila and BNSF jointly funded an access study for a total cost of $241,173.23 to determine a potential new alternative route for truck traffic into the intermodal yard. As part of the study, open houses were held and community input was collected. The following four alternatives were considered along with the status quo (S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge). 1 Airport Way S. 3 Gateway Drive - north leg 2 S. 112th Street 4 48th Avenue S. In December 2016, the City began environmental review of the access study by completing a SEPA checklist. After receiving comments that probable, significant adverse environmental impacts of some for the truck route alternatives would trigger the requirement for a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the City paused environmental review in August 2017 due to several factors, including but not limited to: - City staff did not clearly articulate the various challenges associated with the alternative access effort, including: o No budget or clear direction for completing next phases of alternative access study o Required environmental regulatory process and potential project opponents o Increased concerns regarding 42nd Ave S. Bridge and focus on securing state grant funds (City applied for bridge replacement grant funds in 2017 and 2019 without success) o Other capital project priorities on Capital Improvement Plan, (such as the Strander Boulevard extension into Renton and 42nd Ave S. Bridge replacement) - Changes in city personnel Phone; 2O6-433-1200 • Email: Mayor@TukwillaWA.gov + Website: TukwiilaWA.gcv 26 Map of the study area and alternatives routes Phone; 206-433-1800 Email; Mayor TukwilaWA,gov • Website: TukwilMWA.gov 27 III. POTENTIAL NEXT STEPS To move forward with an alternative access analysis, the environmental review must be resumed for a set of feasible alternatives and the status quo (no action alternative). Early SEPA review requires having each of the access alternatives defined well enough to adequately conduct the review for possible environmental impacts. A. SEPA Review of All Routes (EIS). Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") on all four alternative routes as compared to the status quo / "no action" alternative is recommended prior to choosing a preferred route. An EIS is intended to be an impartial tool to identify and analyze probable adverse environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and possible mitigation for the impacts. An EIS is required when significant adverse environmental impacts are likely from a project, such as here, where two of the alternatives involve a new bridge across a salmon bearing river. If a full scope EIS is undertaken, all of the alternatives in the 2016 Draft BNSF Access Study would be analyzed. Below are the elements considered during SEPA review/analysis: Environmental Elements for SEPA Analysis 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy and Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land and Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light and Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities Scoping is the first step in the EIS process. The purpose of scoping is to narrow the focus of the EIS to significant environmental issues, eliminate insignificant impacts from detailed study, and identify alternatives to be analyzed in the EIS. Scoping also provides notice to the public and other agencies that an EIS is being prepared, and initiates their involvement in the process. The result of the scoping process might be a reduced number of access alternatives and/or environmental elements to be studied. While a narrower document will reduce costs, one that does not fully consider environmental impacts may be more vulnerable to legal challenge. IV. PROJECT CHALLENGES The Project presents numerous, significant challenges. The status quo involves the 42nd Ave S bridge, which is nearing the end of its useful life, is beyond repair and requires replacement. All potential alternatives are challenging due to overall costs, lack of funding options for an alternative route, environmental concerns and potential litigation. Anticipated Cost Considerations: Option 1: Update Previous Cost Estimates: Estimated cost is $15,000 to $50,000 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will be approximately $15,000 to $50,000. Option 2: EIS on all alternatives: Estimated cost is $750,000 to $900,0001 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact application process is approximately $750,000 to $900,000. The cost would depend on the scope, such as the number of route alternatives (or the number of environmental elements) selected for review. The estimated timeline for completing this EIS is 18 to 24 months. This EIS would be useful only for a certain period of time and depending on when funding was secured (if several years later due to Federal or Updated (April 2021) cost estimate from David Evans and Associates; a limited scope EIS would be less, yet likely could still cost between $500,000 and $750,000. Phone; 2O6 -433-18Q0 • Email: Mayor@TukwillaWA.gov + Website: TukwilaWA.gov 28 State funding availability), it may need to be updated (supplemented) for an additional cost. A full EIS or partial EIS will both require the City to hire a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. This brings the total estimated costs up to $1.2 million dollars for the EIS and City staff requirements. Option 3: Research and analyze funding options to secure future funding if feasible: Seek via State and Federal funding for an alternative access route, once it has been defined. At this time there is a current lack of funding for new bridges, which are proposed in two of the four alternatives, as such, there is not currently a good fit for state and federal funding. However, the potential for a Federal infrastructure package may occur, but is unknown at this time. Nor are the application requirements known. Those potential funds may be used to fix deteriorating infrastructure rather than `build new'. The City will follow this closely. In addition, if a bridge was chosen as the alternate access, it will serve primarily as a bridge for freight traffic. Access to Baker Commodities or residential use would have to be considered but may be a design challenge in certain cases. The reality that the public will not be able to use this infrastructure, and that it will largely benefit private industry, makes it a difficult candidate for public funding. Project Costs Project costs for any alternative are unknown until preliminary engineering is underway. For example, an estimated cost for the 48th Ave S. route alternative, developed in 2016, was approximately $20 million. Due to price escalation, in 2019, it was estimated that this cost could have nearly doubled to $34M. Any estimate will need to be updated, and based on this alternative's less than 10% design, any alternative's design would need to progress further to get a better cost estimate. An example of a project in the City for comparison is the Strander Boulevard easterly extension into Renton, WA. That project was originally estimated at $29 million, upon completion of design work, it was identified at $80 million. The City, even with existing State and Federal resources, did not have the money to proceed with the project, so it was cancelled. The City had received Federal grant funding of $5 million for the design work, but since the project was stopped, the City had to return that funding to the Federal Government. Potential Litigation Due to the complexity of these alternatives, there are various entities who may challenge any of these alternatives, including adjacent property owners, tribal governments, other city and state governments, and local businesses. FINANCIAL IMPACT Option 1: Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will be approximately $15,000 to $50,000. Please note that these cost estimates are based on a very preliminary engineering design and are subject to change. Option 2: Staff also estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact statement process is approximately $750,000 to $900,000. This effort will also require a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. The total for Option 2 is approximately up to $1.2 million dollars. RECOMMENDATION It is Staffs recommendation that it would be most appropriate to proceed with Options 1 and 2. ATTACHMENTS: Draft BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study - Draft Alternative Screening Analysis (full draft) Draft BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study - Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary Phone; 2O6-433-1200 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov + Website: TukwiilaWA.gov 29 30 ram a�.vvg.0 Aiperi■� w.sF 31 MARY 0 33 Airpc,rf Way AJJarriatika 3 1:1M 3r:10.4 ,T'r AJtarawt'ex Mociaver-tiliumts;• 34 35 36 Areas 37 Yq:;.0 01,5..*" :1i7aaax+Fr ns:WrApozidsr 39 IlliMCVMFMIS 40 41 plexit / 42 1 I II ME II I INN IMO MOM MEM 3 iax'arC,i►S•'ti !zip") AWSI 45 46 • 111 Wirf)l-LIC • 47 • 48 U ;:`:4iliVlM11111I:wgii/i11II1Gbll11n11111111111*ii111`+ it , i ..f i,.,, ti. -&e1 41.1.1 .a1I a. _ p 11.,1.! wnR rc 49 COPETR.IGT hEW . AHD 16411 "ev. C r rn*ut'r Wale PrAD VA Y 50 • II, 51 • RKI 52 53 • 1 54 • C4RIDE 55 • • 56 • U } F 12 2 woRr� 57 r I 58 l 59 60 U VitertIZAK 61 2 1^R 62 • Dimako TA W 4. AIMS I V y )R/ 63 44. 64 wc 65 • ter I< 66 VViCk1ZI-C ' 67 68 69 • 70 48TH AVE ALTERNATIVE GATEWAY DR ALTERNATIVE S 124TH STREET ALTERNATIVE • • S 112TH ST ALTERNATIVE • • AIRPORT WAY S ALTERNATIVE • SI / 76 ighiintodel AJlornaLFrc attempt!Mo IrjrrC I LAibs-naliv a 1 aRe nalivo Intermodal .AJlnrnnIi.m rkrrll 11'011 Ifl ( R r.:n;s: $llomeli.y , i. . ;1#7ueli imt rehgkiltelty). Gtwemrah h hCra:C.9,.Ai.,prucalVacue.r=rElsi u 79 Gtorwa In#rn �1�illi9'K�JtlI lemalrre Gnlevwny Duriarrigh D 80 Inlonurtan irarmadnl DinefamiSh nll9rfbLi ' BNSF RAILWAY INTERMODAL FACILITY ACCESS STUDY ALTERNATIVE SCREENING ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for: City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98005 Prepared by: David Evans and Associates, Inc. 14432 SE Eastgate Way Bellevue, WA 98007 November 28, 2016 82 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Alternative Screening Analysis Report for the City of Tukwila was prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. to evaluate alternative access to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway intermodal facility in Tukwila, Washington. This facility is also known as South Seattle Yard. BNSF Railway also sponsored this study, The existing access to the intermodal facility uses 42nd Avenue S and 5 124th Street. 5 124th Street is also a residential collector street serving the community of Allentown. Several residential homes with driveways are located on S 124th Street, as is the Tukwila Community Center which houses an aquatic center, meeting rooms, classes and activities for all ages, and playground and ball fields. This study did not create new alternatives but used alternatives that were developed by previous studies. A total of five alternatives were studied. Airport Way S, 5 112th Street, S 124th Street, Gateway Drive — North Leg, and 48th Avenue S. Several desktop researches were performed as part of this study. These researches included critical and sensitive areas, fish and wildlife, water resources, hazardous materials, geological and soils, and cultural and historical resources. A scored screening matrix was developed collaboratively between the City of Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. The matrix was presented to Tukwila City Council as well as to the public for their feedback on the screening matrix criteria. The public was allowed to provide feedback via an on-line open house and an in-person open house. Representatives from Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. met to score each alternative using a numerical scoring system from 1 to 9. The score for each criteria was added, and the lowest score is the preferred alternative. Based on the scoring result, the 48th Avenue S alternative is the preferred alternative. PATUKA0000001310800lNFO10670RaportsISMSF Jntermodal Access Screening summary_2016•1128.docx City of Tukwila 1 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 2016 83 Figure 1 shows the project study area. The following provides a description for each alternative. Figure 1— Project Study Area r r S )12th Street Alternative Head Airport Way��i Alternative Valley SBANGO SF S 124th Street Gateway Drive Extension Alternative ':'� Gateway Cerpclrete Cetier aTaC xray s�;,4ld ir.‘r PI t 4 ie -1 Avenue S Ex -tension Altern.1ti ve ing• t -y F;111 TUKA000OO6131O&OiNFO10¢70Reparrsl9NSF IntermodarAccess Screening sumrnary_2016 1128.dbcx City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access 3 Alternative Screening Analysis November 28, 2016 84 Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary BNSF Access Study DRAFT — September 5, 2017 Background In 2016, the Tukwila community provided input on the screening criteria that was used to develop the BNSF Access Study report. The City identified a preferred alternative route and shared it with the community at an open house on August 17, 2017. Summary The City of Tukwila hosted an in-person open house at the Tukwila Community Center on August 17, 2017. The in-person house accompanied an online open house, which included the same information as the in-person open house and was available from August 15 - 28, 2017. Notifications The project team advertised the in-person and online open houses in early August 2017. Notifications included the following: • Postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods • Emails to the City's project listsery o Listsery includes community members, business and property owners, other interested parties • Flier emailed as attachment to Allentown and Duwamish neighborhood listservs by neighborhood leaders • Facebook and Twitter posts on the City's social media accounts Attendance and visitor statistics • In-person open house attendance: 42 • In-person comment forms completed: 20 • Online open house visitors: 32 • Online surveys completed: 12 • Overall number of participants: 74 Engagement Methods In -Person Open House The City gathered shared information about the preferred alternative and other considered alternatives during an open house at the Tukwila Community Center on August 17, 2017, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Participants viewed informational boards that described the project purpose, schedule, alternative and preferred routes, screening criteria and environmental process. Project staff were on hand to answer questions. Participants contributed comments via comment cards. Comments received at the open house are shown in Appendix 1 and summarized below. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 85 In-person open house participants give feedback on comment cards. Online Open House In order to reach Tukwila businesses and residents who were unable to attend the in-person open house, the City advertised an online open house, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, starting August 15 and ending August 28. The online open house included the same information as at the in- person open house and a survey that gathered specific feedback in a similar fashion to the comment boxes at the in-person open house. Comments received through the online open house are shown in Appendices 2 and summarized below. Feedback Overview Several themes emerged from the input received through 32 comments and surveys: • Those who supported the preferred alternative (15) stated a number of reasons for their support, including moving the truck route to a commercial street and away from residences, access/proximity to I-5 and current residential impacts on 124th. • All residents who said they live along or near the current access route who participated (4) supported moving the truck access route to another street. • Those who opposed the preferred alternative (4) stated increased traffic, business impacts and residential impacts as reasons for their opposition. • Several participants urged the City to study or investigate cost (4) and traffic (3). Several participants also expressed interest in potential environmental impacts (3). Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 86 Next Steps All feedback presented here is being provided to the project team for consideration. The study and proposed route will be presented to City Council in the fall of 2017. One participant requested specific follow up regarding business impacts on 48th Ave S: Quinn Closson, 360-607-8178, qclosson@pape.com. Appendices 1. Comments gathered at in-person open house 2. Online comments 3. Notifications Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 87 Appendix 1: Comments Gathered at In-person Open House Note: comments are verbatim as written. Commenters were asked if they live, work or visit Tukwila. Live Work Visit Name Email Comment (verbatim) x Phillip Camball Phillameball@hotmail.com Anything except 48th Ave S. Minimum public $, maximum private funding. x Angela Steel angelasb13@hotmail.com I prefer the 48th Ave S option as the least impactful to residential properties in Allentown and Duwamish. This option keeps semis on existing truck routes w/out creating new roads through environmentally critical areas or private property. *Also need noise wall along edge of railyard. [unknown] [unknown] My first choice BNSF move out completely. Second choice I prefer 48th Ave S. Build wall to control noise and shaking control. x Mary Fertakis [unknown] Thanks for all the work that has been done on this. The grid was particularly helpful - very concrete information and easy to understand. The original study in 1990 shows that the 48th st option was the least expensive and made the most sense. It is the same in 2017. Seems pretty clear that this is still the direction to go. x x David Shumate David@propeldesins.com The 48th Ave and Bridge looks like the best one! x x Sean Albert seanalbert2001@hotmail.com I think the preferred 48th ave south route is by far the best alternative!! Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 88 x Patty Cokus pcokus@hotmail.com I agree wholeheartedly with the preffered study route where it impacts all identified impact criteria the least and is the least expensive. Thank you for working on this and advocating for community input and gathering feedback. The preferred route makes the most sense for all. x [Illegible] [unknown] I think the preferred option makes the most sense of those presented. It takes the traffic completely off residential streets and on to a commercial street that already accomodates semi - truck traffic. x Lucia Nilo Itannilo@hotmail.com I hope this project gets look at seriously as I really enjoy my home at 124th - but the vibration of the trucks in and out 24-7 is really bad and nuisance. It shakes our house especially when sleeping - the NO -Build option: S 124th should not be an option. x Wilfredo Nilo wznilo@gmail.com We live by 124th ave which is active for semi -trucker. Since we moved here from september 2016 we felt a massive vibration everytime those truckets pass by. We live in a brand new home and it created major cracks in aour garage. We worried whats gonna happen next. x Oscar Uceda o.uceda@yahoo.com We would like to support the prefer alternative for the trucks route coming in and out of the BNSF Railroad Yard facility in Allentown. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 89 x x Becky [Illegible] becarosep@aim.com Concern the increase in traffic from now and 20 years down the road on the 48th ave purposal. What effects it will have on the businesses on 48th (widening roads etc) Residents being impacted by not being able to get access to the businesses they already go to. x Morgan Llewellyn mllewellyn@ccim.net I'm wonderng how the project will be funded particularly in light of the right away acquisitions required by the preferred route. It appears the northern route would have the least impact on residential AND commercial businesses. x Todd Jones rain1916@comcast.net I stronly oppose Gateway Drive option and 124th st options. I do like the 48th st option or others to the north. x Hanice Ludingtons shofarJCL@gmail.com My preference is Airport Way x [Illegible] [Illegible] The road should go out the north end. I live on 51st (across the street from the flat bed trucks, and am concerned about where the railroad will put the road inside this yard. Will trucks have to be removed and trailers [illegible]? And if so, where will they go? It is close to our homes, your moving one road to another. x Linda McLeod sam.linda.mcleod@gmail.com No on Gateway Dr. Divides BECU campuses, has many employees + customers x [unknown] [unknown] Airport SO. (BEST) [sic] Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 90 x I live in 122nd st. I hope the 124th s st. would be closed as enterence of BNSF or trucks facility. The impact to our Edna edna0801@gmail.com home and neighborhood is Derr[illegible] terrible, the house vibrates each time; lots of noise; and traffic gets crowded. 48th st is great alternative for the BNSB enterence. Steven steve@xmrine.com We'd like to see a traffic impact study done on inerurban and exit 156 off 1-5. Please go to fife and see the issues they have and avoid that happening to us. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 91 Appendix 2: Comments from Online Open House Note: comments are verbatim as written. Comment 1. Will all trucks no longer use 124th st ? 2. Will there be entry and exit capability from 50th PL S/129th street? we must have the capability to enter and exit from 50th PL 5/129th street. Please make sure this option available. Thanks for your consideration How much will this cost? What about an option to improve the 42nd st. bridge by the community center and do some mitigation on the streets that the trucks drive down, such as widening the shoulders of the street, side walks and maybe even some sort of sound barrier? How is this project prioritized compared to needs in other neighborhoods such as sidewalks and road repair? I am an employee of BECU and believe that the 48th Ave So. preferred option is by far the best choice. Not only from a cost perspective but also from a life safety, employee/member environment and the disruption of multiple businesses/residential and land/building value standpoint. The 48th Ave So. option already houses a street with truck yard access and would be a much easier way to execute on this initiative. While I know this still impacts some, it is the reasonable choice and should be adopted. I am not only a Tukwila resident but also a Tukwila business owner that would be greatly affected by the "preferred" route of 48th AVE S. The overall impact on the businesses along this route would be devastating. People are already frustrated with the current amount of big trucks coming along 48th. We are already lacking suitable gas stations in Tukwila. Please don't make them impossible to get to. Tukwila is a growing city and the north side (Airport way) of it is already industrial. Interurban Ave is an incredibly popular thoroughfare for many people going south/north and the 2 gas stations on 48th Ave services more than half of those people. Please reconsider 112th or Airport way as the better alternative that will impact our growing city the least amount. Thank you. I am very happy that the city is analyzing other options for the truck route into the BNSF yard. The current route is not sustainable. My family prefers the 48th Av S option since it uses an existing commercial street and is least impactful to residential communities and the environment. I would like you to heavily factor in the environmental impacts the other two northerly options would have on wetlands and existing greenspaces.Will the Airport Way option impede future Light rail/Sounder station location planning efforts? How will the different entrance options impact yard operations? Currently, the BNSF yard is very noisy 24/7 with back up beepers. Will these operations shift or diminish with the varying options? Can the city proceed with pursuing the noise wall installation along the railyard boundary? I think this will make a significant improvement to the quality of life in Duwamish and Allentown. thank you I represent The Pape' Group, Inc. who owns the Ditch Witch dealership on 48th Ave, South. I understand there will be significant traffic impact during construction. I don't think we're overly concerned about that. However, I'd like a little more information on the traffic study or estimates on additional traffic impact on 48th Ave. South after completion of the project. Also, will there be any improvements done to the 48th Ave road itself? Finally, is there something I'm missing that you think we should be concerned about as a business right on 48th Ave? Thanks, Quinn Closson 360-607-8178 qclosson@pape.com Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 92 I wish that this 124th St. access be change to a different access ASAP because we moved here in a new home development last year 2016 of Sept. which we are not aware about this 124th St. right beside our house is the major access for truckers. We encountered 24-7 of a massive vibration like an earthquake multiple times everyday and we felt scary that our house may collapse one of this day. So far we had a multiple long cracks in our garage and hopefully will not affect the foundation. We live right by the stop sign where those truckers heading out from BNSF gate and also for coming in. That really distract us everyday. There's a time when some of the truck driver lost their focus on the stop sign especially in the evening and they made an emergency brakes and it shakes the ground so bad and it vibrates our house also. I Believe that 48th Ave S is the best alternatives route for the truckers. I work at BECU. The Gateway alternative would have a negative impact on our members who come into our Tukwila Financial Center to conduct their personal business (primarily retail banking, trust services, and investment services). We are about to engage on a Gateway campus upgrade and a truck route cutting through the middle of it would have a negative impact on our employee experience and may have a negative impact on our ability to recruit and retain employees. Given the existing land use abutting most of your preferred alternative (gas stations, commercial, etc.). I can see the potential noise downside for a hotel (but it's already next To 1-5 and a busy off ramp so marginal impact seems moderate). I would like to avoid having another bridge over the river and prefer this option: S 112th Street Thank you. Thank you for considering all options and explaining the reasoning. What timeframe are you looking at for construction of the new bridge and roadway. What impact will there be on the existing Interurban Bike/Walking Trail both during construction and upon completion. Will traffic studies be done to work on minimalizing impact at the intersection for traffic on Interurban and from the off ramp on 15? This route makes the most sense as it is a quick, direct route off of 1-5, drives through a commercial area only and does not affect the public's experience of their greenspace, except for a small segment of the bike trail. I fully support this preferred route. What are the costs? How it will be funded? Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 93 Appendix 3: Notifications Social media City of Tukwila - Government Auouvt v 21 3.34,'m 10 Join us for a BNSF Access Study Project Open House on August 17, 2017 The City of Tukwila has identified 48th Ave S as the preferred route to access the BNSF Railway Intermodal Facility in Allentown_ Before the route is formally decided_ we're holding an Open House and online forum to talk to you about the route that we selected based on the criteria you helped us shape. BNSF Access Study Project Open House Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. Tukwila Community Center 2424 42nd Ave S, Tukwila, WA 981€B Can't make it to the open house? Share your thoughts online! Now through August 28, 2017, you can share your thoughts at https:ifTukBNSFAccess.Participate.Onhine All information from the Open House will be online. Translation options are available. Email us at AccessStudytukwilawa.gov or call 206-433-0179 with any questions. CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF Access Study Project 1i Like 3 Comment TN Ccr a+ir l.,aW lu4 Kim nikni oleos *. S es tNe wrened rdVat to amer% H.e NIS<-punm4d.1 f I,ra n ii-rtimet, Waft) Ike Cdr' , lue'> 68e rf.Q !srk'Le t m Op.n tlo4,ve ora isle: raum PU oaf 4D, . bt .. On, * R* the +r :+ es ted based sr. nhr 4rir'1 u•. alup* arrival and moadrna.1 an #n p.aa,+ad OF, ma 0,ea darebr 3. awn tloaw Auputt S ya a *CI Rau Lob imam iCor dM110/ p Gllrelpt 17411 by! Ave t Tutta i, 11164II1U 1#eir ons,wrf0 , loam WaifI*prene,d aill rnnti elvure o_hr ene.ronrttrfHnJproem pglsnit a soar rntorapher Onir Annan More dkrpuab Aurae.33, 2d}'T, law can ,Lara tourihpuRhts seYa.a. ya,e Mapr//ftr oAftec..t n..rrrs... yVHnr ra.aaar *► Share 3 shares Facebook post published August 9, 2017. Top Comments F Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 94 C4) City of Tukwila G @,CityofTuk-wila , Aug 9 Join us for a BNSF Access Study Project Open House on August 17, 2017 CITY OF TUKWILA B NSF Access Study Project tlir cttw or tvtwea l+as #pb Owe 5 ac ah! preferred mum u Accoss n+. Off Ita.lwap bite modal tpoigtt? Ai.rinrrn. 19141:117. th. rout i ormaiy drw se/. WOW halom'e an Cpin Home part arJrga tuner. tip oat m raw ab Elul tfs %or We -nod based or the crentin •I. nolgi.d us s1+.mae wbi. and ci rmerr. on the preferred SIM' ni1 a anile. L Open House Tia r,4 . Autiui5 17, 2261) 5 ip 7! rldt 7 ukt.114 Corketiamieg CORM 12424 wen Are 5, Tukwila, WA 9B1M •rrr.or Fortjao oprif irons at+Ier rlar porfiefmt ttaP'+r hoer remale .nC the cfPneR talpl. PtAA 1140ie &sir rMPsoll i. 2 QlrMr', rtirsorr New through .04061. at ZI, 21a17, WA/ LIM abate teat itra ihn anllnel Visit .Tel .5.!1i1 115FAczel2-.0,onidpate.0n11+te r'ta hrlimmarVolo [ow illi COY,►f9,44,[ WaY be wine pro t!lPriatt clomp Qui asegaritOr. 2 Tweet published August 9, 2017. Postcard CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF Access Study Project The City has identified 48th Ave 5 as the preferred route to access the BNSF yard in Allentown. Before the route is formally decided, we're holding an open house and online forum to talk to you about the route that we selected based on the trite''; you helped us shape, Review and comment on the preferred alternative route: 1. In person Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. Tukwila Community Center 12424 42nd Ave 5, Tukwila, WA 98168 Meet project staff learn about the preferred alternative route and environmental process, and shore your thoughts. 2. Online Now through August 28, you can share your thoughts online! Visit TukBNSFAccess.Particlpate.OnIine Ali information from the in-person event will be online. Tronslathon options are available. Questions? Email us at Accessstudy@tukwitawa.gov tar call 206-433-0179. One side of a postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 95 CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF Access Study Project Public Works Administration 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Review and comment on the preferred alternative route, 48th Ave S in person Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Tukwila Community Center Online TukB NS FAccess. Pa rtici pa te.O n I i ne Reverse of a postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods. Emails Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 96 Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Meeting Remote Meeting per Governor Proclamation 20-28 June 14, 2021 — 7:00 P.M. MINUTES This meeting was conducted remotely, with the City Council, Mayor, and staff off-site and participating via a remote electronic system. All participants, including the Mayor, Councilmembers, City staff, and legalcounsel wxxeno/at Tukwila City Hall and participated via a remote electronic system. The phone number for public participation that was provided via the agenda distribution process was: 1-253-292-9750, access code 670077847# as well as a link to join the Microsoft Teams Meeting. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council President Kruller called the remote Tukwila City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. OFFICIALS Present at the virtual meeting were Council President Kruller; Councilmembers Verna Seal, Kathy Hougardy, De'Sean Quinn, Thomas McLeod, Zak [clan, Cynthia Delostrinos Johnson. CITY OFFICIALS Allan Ekberg, MayorRachel Bianchi, Deputy City AdministratorNora Gierloff, Community Development Director; Vicky Carlsen, Finance Director; Juan PadiUa, Human Resources Director; Eric Dreyer, Police Chief; Mindi Mattmon, Emergency Manager; Jay Wittwer, Fire Chief; Norm Golden, Deputy Fire Chief; Ben Hayman, Fire Marshal; Tracy Gallaway, Acting Parks & Recreation Director; Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director; Cyndy Knighton, Senior Public Works Program Manager; Joel Bush, Chief Technology Officer; Laurel Humphrey, Legislative Analyst; Andy Youn, Deputy City Clerk. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Council President Kruller stated "The City of Tukwila is located on the ancestral lands of the Coast Salish people. We acknowledge their continuing connections to land, waters and culture. We pay our respects to their elders past, present and emerging." PUBLIC COMMENTS Those wishing to provide public comment had the opportunity to deliver public comments by signingup via email by 5:00 p.m. today to have the comments read or state them verbally at the virtual meeting. There were no public comments. PUBLIC HEARING A resolution adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. 7:03 p.m. Council President Kruller opened the public hearing and called for a staff report. Cyndy Knihton.GeniorProBnamK8mnmge[exoeineddlisresoudonedoptstheennua|updatauftheSix- Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for 2022-2027 as required by State law. The proposed TIP adds five pjects and removes one pject because it is expected to be completed before July 1, 2021. 97 Tukwila City CouncCommittee of the Whole Minutes June 14, 2021 Page 2of5 7:07 p.m. Council President Kruller called for public comments. There were no public comments. Council President Kruller asked if there was anyone else who wished to make a public comment on this topic and to press *6 on the phone to unmute. There were no additional public comments. 7:08 p.m. Council President Kruller closed the public hearing. SPECIAL ISSUES a. A resolution adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. b. Weekly COVID-19 Report. RacheBianchi, Deputy City Administrator, provided an update on the City's coronavirus response as follows: Human services continues to assist households with rental assistance; data is available on programs such as Park n' Play, Senior Meals, and Tukwila pantry; Per a request from Councilmember Quinn, vaccine data by region and age has been included in the report Following a request from Councilmember Delostrinos Johnson, Ms. Bianchi relayed King County Public Health — Seattle & King County continues to partner with the City to vaccinate communities that are not at the 70% vaccinated threshold. Based on a question from Council President Kruller, K8indi K8attsnn, Emergency Manager, confirmed the request to extend the National Guard's assistance at Tukwila Pantry has been denied. Volunteers are being trained and a contingency plan is in place. c. Emergency Management Update: (1) An update on the Emergency Management Program Work Plan. (2) A resolution to become a signatory of the Regional Coordination Framework for resource sharing during a disaster. Mindi Mattson, Emergency Manager, provided an overview of the City's Emergency Management Program and the Regional Coordination Framework which establishes a cooperative platform between different agencies to address emergency assistance and sharing of information and resources during a disaster or major planned event within King County. The proposed resolution adds the City as a signatory to the Regional Coordinator Framework. CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THE RESOLUTION TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. d. An update and Council Consensus on the Fire Advisory Task Force and funding request for consultation services. Norm Golden, Deputy Fire Chief, provided an update on the activities of the Fire Advisory Task Force that was formed following the recommendations from the Center for Public SafetManagement (CPSM) Report. The task force is seeking approval to onboard consultants Bill Cushion and Kareen Reed, who both have extensive local experience working with emergency services. There will be simultaneous implementation of a recruitment process to ensure an effective task force with membership that is representative of the community. Councilmember Wan asked for a list of budget amendments to date. Based on a question from Councilmember McLeod, Mayor Ekberg shared City Administrator David Cline learned of consultants Bill Cushman and Karen Reed through outreach to other jurisdictions. 98 Tukwila City CouncCommittee of the Whole Minutes June 14, 2021 Page 3 of 5 Based on a question from Councilmember Seal, Vicky Cedsen, Finance Director, indicated a budget amendment will be required to fund the request for consultant services that will come out of the General Fund. Following an inquiry from Council President Kruller, Mr. Golden confirmed the consultants have extensive experience working with agencies to retain fire services within the organization in addition to other options such as contracting for services, annexing to a current agency, and forming Regional Fire Authorities. CONSENSUS EXISTED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTATION SERVICES AND TIMELINE FOR ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY FIRE ADVISORY TASK FORCE. e. An update and Council Consensus on options for BNSF Alternative Access Study. Han Ponnekanti, Public Works Director, provided an update on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Intermodal Facility Access Study that reviews alternate routes for a new truck traffic route. Staff is seeking Council approval on Options 1 and 2 as outlined in the informational memorandum: (1) To update the David Evans contract to revise previous cost estimates in the report for the amount of $15,000 to $50,000; and (2) To complete an environment impact statement process which will cost approximately $750,000 to $900,000, in addition to hiring a term -limited Pject Manager for $300,000 for two years. Councilmember Seal reported the Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee discussed pursuing Option 3 (research and analysis of funding options) whenever feasible. Following a question from Councilmember Hougardy regarding funding sources, Mr. Ponnekanti explained funding sources could include a waste management surcharge for roads and road -related projects, bond issues, use of general funds, American Rescue Plan Act funds, or a combination of the above. Based on a question from Council President Kruller, Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administrator, shared the City has been in communication with Allentown residents and intends to hold a community meeting in the near future. The term -limited Project Manager proposed through Option 2 will also be responsible for interacting with the community. CONSENSUS EXISTED TO PROCEED WITH OPTIONS 1 AND 2 AS OUTLINED IN THE AGENDA DOCUMENTATION. REPORTS a. Mayor Mayor Ekberg shared the Tukwila, City of Opportunity Scholarships were presented to awardees at the virtual Foster High School Awards Night. b. City Council Councilmember Seal reported the Tranand Infrastructure Services Committee forwarded 3 items to the next Regular Meeting Consent Agenda: The Public Works Shops Minkler Restroom Remodel Project, the Public Works Shops Fence and Gates Pject, and Transportation Demand Management Program Regional Mobility Grant Program Award. The Committee also discussed trash pickup and graffiti cleanup and received an update on the Public Works Tenant Improvements project. There will be a page on the City website that will have contacts listed for issues with illegal dumping and graffiti. Councilmember Hougardy attended a Sound Cities Association Women in Leadership meeting today where they discussed the impacts of the pandemic on women. Councilmember Quinn thanked the Council President and Laurel Humphray, Legislative Analyst, for their hard work on the recent Council retreat. He relayed a recent incident in Allentown in which a semi -truck 99 Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes June 14, 2021 Page 4 of 5 was at risk of damaging a resident's home. Public Works will be reviewing the matter. He thanked the Tukwila Police Department on behalf of neihborhood community safety teams for their coordination on a recent event. Councilmember McLeod thanked the Council President and Ms. Humphrey for the recent Council retreat. The King County Growth Management Planning Council is continuing work on countywide Planning Policies for which he is submitting amendments relating to jurisdictional responsibilities. Councilmember Idan thanked the Council President for facilitating the Council retreatHe reported the Finance and Governance Committee continued discussion on prioritizing restoration of service levels in the City, technology options for the Council Chambers and Council Committee conference rooms, and marijuana tax revenue which has been shelved due to conversations happening at the State level. The Committee opted to pursue Option 3, modernization of all technology for the Council Chambers and Committee rooms. Councilmember Delostrinos Johnson thanked the Council President and Ms. Humphrey for an inspiring Council retreat. Council President Kruller attended a Housing Development Consortium meeting regarding permanent supportive housing as well as a presentation by the Cascade Water Alliance regarding the history and future of water supply. She participated in a Transportation Policy Board meeting through the Puget Sound Regional Council, a Public Issues Committee meeting through Sound Cities Association, and a Sound Cities Association Women in Leadership meeting. She attended the grand soft opening of the Holden Southcenter, an assisted living community. Council President Kruller thanked the Council for their patience with the Council retreat. c. Staff Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administratoroffered a reminder on the Inaugural Juneteenth Commemoration that will begin June 19, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. on ExperienceTukwila.com. She thanked all those who have worked on the project. MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember [clan asked what could be done to support the Duwamish Tribe in their efforts to gain federal re -recognition. Laurel Humphrey, Legislative Analyst, shared Cecile Hansen, Chairwoman of the Duwamish Tribe, wrote to her today and shared the link to sign a petition for federal recognition that she will forward to the Council. Councilmember McLeod encouraged the Council to reach out to Representative Adam Smith in addition to signing the petition. Council President Kruller suggested placing this as an item on a future Committee Services and Safety Committee agenda. Councilmember Quinn indicated he looks forward to more opportunities to engage with Chairwoman Hansen at a Council or Committee meeting. 100 Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes June 14, 2021 Page 5 of 5 ADJOURNMENT 9:15 p.m. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KRULLER DECLARED THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING ADJOURNED. Kat- , C uncil President If.aytft2.2,2,21Mr,0114.,11,,W.I.A.E4, Andy Youn, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT: 6/25/21 AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEBSITE: 6/28/21 101