HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIS 2021-07-12 Item 2E - Discussion - BNSF Alternative Access StudyCity of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
Publ'ic Works Department - Marr P€x nekarrtr„ Director/City Engineer
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer
CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg
DATE: July 9, 2021
SUBJECT: BNSF Alternative Access Study
Project No. 99510409
EIS Process Budget, Schedule, and Next Steps
ISSUE
Information regarding the BNSF Alternative Access Study Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process, identifying
budget sources, outlining consultant selection process, and project schedule. Staff is requesting direction on a funding
path to implement a Term -Limited Project Manager to manage the EIS process and the EIS consultant qualification
request.
BACKGROUND
On June 14, 2021, at the Committee of the Whole Meeting, Council directed Public Works staff to proceed with staff
recommended Options 1 and 2, which include updating costs estimates and a full EIS review of all alternate routes.
Option 1: Update Previous Cost Estimates: Estimated cost is $15,000 to $50,000
Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will
be approximately $15,000 to $50,000.
Option 2: EIS on all alternatives: Estimated cost is $750,000 to $900,000
Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact application process is approximately
$750,000 to $900,000. The cost would depend on the scope, such as the number of route alternatives (or the number of
environmental elements) selected for review. The estimated timeline for completing this EIS is 18 to 24 months. This EIS would
be useful only for a certain period of time and depending on when funding was secured (if several years later due to Federal or
State funding availability), it may need to be updated (supplemented) for an additional cost. A full EIS or partial EIS will both
require the City to hire a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. This brings the total
estimated costs up to $1.2 million dollars for the EIS and City staff requirements.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") on all four alternative routes as compared to the status quo I "no
action" alternative is recommended prior to choosing a preferred route. An EIS is intended to be an impartial tool to identify
and analyze probable adverse environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and possible mitigation for the impacts. An EIS
is required when significant adverse environmental impacts are likely from a project, such as here, where two of the
alternatives involve a new bridge across a salmon bearing river. If a full scope EIS is undertaken, all of the alternatives in the
2016 Draft BNSF Access Study would be analyzed, including the following four alternatives along with the status quo (S. 124th
St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge).
1
Airport Way S.
3
Gateway Drive - north leg
2
S. 112th Street
4
48th Avenue S.
21
Map of the study area and alternatives routes
Uninc.
King .
6 't�
Environmental Elements Considered for EIS Analysis
1. Earth
2. Air
3. Water
4. Plants
5. Animals
6. Energy & Natural Resources
7. Environmental Health
8. Land and Shoreline Use
9. Housing
10. Aesthetics
11. Light and Glare
12. Recreation
13. Historic and Cultural
Preservation
14. Transportation
15. Public Services
16. Utilities
Phone; 206-433-1800 • Email; Mayor TukwilaWA,gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov
22
Scoping is the first step in the EIS process. The purpose of scoping is to narrow the focus of the EIS to significant
environmental issues, eliminate insignificant impacts from detailed study, and identify alternatives to be analyzed in the EIS.
Scoping also provides notice to the public and other agencies that an EIS is being prepared and initiates their involvement in
the process. The result of the scoping process might be a reduced number of access alternatives and/or environmental
elements to be studied. While a narrower document will reduce costs, one that does not fully consider environmental impacts
may be more vulnerable to legal challenge.
DISCUSSION
EIS Schedule
Staff outlines the following schedule:
3rd Quarter of 2021
Identify Project Funding
3rd and 4th Quarter of 2021
Hire Term -Limited Project Manager
4th Quarter of 2021
Begin monthly progress meetings with the Allentown Community
1St Quarter of 2022
Start Request for Qualifications process for EIS consultant,
select consultant, and bring contract to Council for approval
2nd Quarter of 2022
Start the EIS
4th Quarter 2023
Complete the EIS and report to Council and the Allentown Community
Funding Sources
The first step in the EIS schedule and process for the BNSF Alternative Access Study is to identify funding sources. Staff has
identified five options for potential funding sources for this project:
1. Transfer unused funds from the 42nd Ave South Bridge Replacement Project design phase after utilizing the PSRC
contingency grant funds.
2. Use ending fund balance from the general fund. (For example in 2020, we ended the year with over $1 million above our
required reserves.)
3. Reallocate a portion of the Solid Waste Utility Tax for year 2022 and 2023 to this project.
4. Move/prioritize funds from other CIP projects during the next budget amendment process to provide a clear funding path for
the BNSF Alternative Access Study EIS process.
5. Issue an Infrastructure Bond for the BNSF Alternative Access Study Project costs and take advantage of the low-interest
rate. The Bond can be repaid over several years.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The overall staffing and consultant costs were in the range of $900,000 - $1,200,000. The interest payment cost will depend on
the options chosen from above. Final direction on the funding choices above should be included in the budget amendment
process. Staff will proceed hiring a Term -Limited Project Manager to complete the consultant qualification request and EIS
process. The project will start incurring costs in the beginning of 2022.
RECOMMENDATION
Discussion only.
Attachments: Transportation & Infrastructure Services Meeting Info Memo- Dated May 21, 2021
Council of the Whole Meeting Minutes- Dated June 14, 2021
Phone; 2O6-433-1200 • Email: Mayor@TukwillaWA.gov + Website: TukwiilaWA.gov
23
City of Tukwila
Allan viayar
I5ILiVi u Die.LILTIIFti.:1u - 6•kanI MI+•I Year.yl.irr ina1IFIwi1T
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer
CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg
DATE: May 21, 2021
SUBJECT: BNSF Alternative Access Study
Project No. 99510409
Project Update and Next Steps
ISSUE
Information regarding the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this memorandum is to share history and information regarding alternatives for a new truck traffic route into the
BNSF intermodal yard to relieve truck traffic from the Allentown neighborhood ("the Project"). While the Tukwila City Council
has been considering access alternatives for the BNSF intermodal yard since the late 1990's, no preferred alternative route
has been selected.
The goal of an alternative route has always been to improve the quality of life for residents in the Allentown, Duwamish and
surrounding areas, which are impacted by the estimated 3,000 trucks per day (of the total 10,000 vehicles per day) which use
the current route (status quo) on S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge to access the BNSF intermodal yard. These trucks
impact air quality, noise, and the safety of residents. A common goal is to move this truck traffic out of the residential area.
Selecting and creating an alternative route into the BNSF intermodal yard has several challenges due to overall costs, lack of
funding options for an alternative route, environmental concerns and potential litigation.
Immediately below is a historical timeline of events related to consideration of alternative routes. This timeline is based on
available records and remembrances of those involved.
I. Historical Alternative Route Consideration Timeline
As shown below, in 1997, the City of Tukwila began studying access alternatives to the BNSF Intermodal Facility.
Date
Activity
1997
•
Hanson & Wilson Co. Access Study for BNSF
1998
•
Harding Lawson Associates Study
2000
•
Cooper Consulting Engineering Study (because previous two studies presented substantially
different capital estimates)
May 2011
•
City Council adopted Res 1741 opposing federal pre-emption relating to railroads
•
Council Member (CM) Hougardy met with Port Commissioner Tarleton to discuss BNSF
expansion concerns
•
City met with BNSF to discuss alternate access
•
City sent letter to BNSF discussing lack of financial assistance, deterioration of 42nd Ave
Bridge from truck traffic
•
BNSF response letter offering further discussions but no specifics
https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2021 Agenda Items/TIC 05-24-21/g. BNSF Alternate Study/info memo BNSF alternatives 05072t.docx
24
Date
Activity
July 2011
•
•
City met with BNSF to clarify understandings and address neighborhood concerns, Council
Members (CMs), Ball Janik (Federal Lobbyist) and reps from Senator Murray, Senator.
Cantwell, Congressman Smith in attendance
City met with Allentown residents
August 2011
•
BSNF letter to city proposing to meet every six months and asserting no plans for expansion
(follow up meetings were not made)
February 2012
•
City met with Ball Janik (Federal Lobbyist) to discuss BNSF and Strander Blvd Ext
May 2012
•
DC trip to meet with reps from Surface Transportation Board
July 2012
•
City met with BNSF followed by letter to Sen. Cantwell
August 2012
•
Allentown residents give public comment opposing alternative route on 115th/116th
November 2012
•
City met with BNSF
April 2013
•
•
•
City Council discussed BNSF Railyard
City met with BNSF and Ball Janik to discuss engineering options, 30% design, EIS, cost
sharing, pursuit of TIGER (Federal grant opportunity), neighborhood livability
Council's CAP Committee discussed scope of work for neighborhood livability study
May 2013
•
City met with BNSF
June 2013
•
Council added BNSF Regional Access Center to Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
August 2013
•
City Council discussed options for study/report for Allentown and BNSF intermodal facility
October 2013
•
City receives Request for Proposal (RFP) from BNSF on southern access alternatives for
review
March 2014
•
City met with BNSF
April 2014
•
City forms internal working group of staff and three CMs
May 2014
•
•
BNSF group meets with Allentown residents on draft Request for Quote (RFQ) for livability
Mayor and CMs meet with Murray, Cantwell and Smith in DC
June 2014
•
•
City talked with Smith office about cooperative funding agreement
BNSF group met with Allentown residents
July 2014
•
•
BNSF Workgroup Tour arranged by Ball Janik
Cooperative Funding Agreement with BNSF for alternative access study
November 2014
•
•
Neighborhood canvassing re: livability
City Council discussion on draft scope of work for BNSF Facility Access Study
March 2015
•
Contract with David Evans and Associates for BNSF Facility Access Study
August 2015
•
Council briefed on progress of BNSF study - August 10, 2015 Council of the Whole (C.O.W.)
December 2015
•
Council briefed on progress of BNSF study - December 14, 2015 C.O.W.
March 2016
•
BNSF Access Study Open House (Tukwila Community Center and Online)
November 2016
•
BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study — Draft Alternative Screening Analysis Report
November 28, 2016
December 2016
•
Draft Study findings transmitted to City Council
March 2017
•
City met with BECU to discuss their concerns with the Gateway Drive alternative
Phone; 24D6-433-1800 Email: Mayor@TukwitaINA.gov • Website: T kwiIa Nt ov
25
Date
Airport Way S.
3
Activity
May 2017
S. 112th Street
•
Notice of SEPA Application issued with comment period ending - June 2, 2017
August 2017
•
Open House — Preferred Alternative Outreach -. August 17, 2017
September 2017
•
Bob Giberson retires; Robin Tischmak becomes Interim Public Works Director
January 2018
•
Henry Hash becomes Public Works Director
March 2019
•
Great Northern Corridor Coalition (GNCC) Meeting and Tour of the BNSF South Seattle
Intermodal Facility. March 27, 2019
June 2019
•
•
TIS Committee discussed project and sent to C.O.W.
Councilmembers toured BNSF facility
October 2019
•
CM Kruller toured BNSF facility with NLC's Brittney Kohler
July 2020
•
Hari Ponnekanti named Interim Public Works Director
February 2021
•
Hari Ponnekanti appointed Public Works Director
May 2021
•
Council's Transportation and Infrastructure Committee agenda item
June 2021
•
Public open house to be held
II. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
In 2015, the City of Tukwila and BNSF jointly funded an access study for a total cost of $241,173.23 to determine a potential
new alternative route for truck traffic into the intermodal yard. As part of the study, open houses were held and community
input was collected. The following four alternatives were considered along with the status quo (S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S.
bridge).
1
Airport Way S.
3
Gateway Drive - north leg
2
S. 112th Street
4
48th Avenue S.
In December 2016, the City began environmental review of the access study by completing a SEPA checklist. After receiving
comments that probable, significant adverse environmental impacts of some for the truck route alternatives would trigger the
requirement for a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the City paused environmental review in August 2017 due to
several factors, including but not limited to:
- City staff did not clearly articulate the various challenges associated with the alternative access effort, including:
o No budget or clear direction for completing next phases of alternative access study
o Required environmental regulatory process and potential project opponents
o Increased concerns regarding 42nd Ave S. Bridge and focus on securing state grant funds (City applied for
bridge replacement grant funds in 2017 and 2019 without success)
o Other capital project priorities on Capital Improvement Plan, (such as the Strander Boulevard extension into
Renton and 42nd Ave S. Bridge replacement)
- Changes in city personnel
Phone; 2O6-433-1200 • Email: Mayor@TukwillaWA.gov + Website: TukwiilaWA.gcv
26
Map of the study area and alternatives routes
Phone; 206-433-1800 Email; Mayor TukwilaWA,gov • Website: TukwilMWA.gov
27
III. POTENTIAL NEXT STEPS
To move forward with an alternative access analysis, the environmental review must be resumed for a set of feasible
alternatives and the status quo (no action alternative). Early SEPA review requires having each of the access alternatives
defined well enough to adequately conduct the review for possible environmental impacts.
A. SEPA Review of All Routes (EIS).
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") on all four alternative routes as compared to the status quo / "no
action" alternative is recommended prior to choosing a preferred route. An EIS is intended to be an impartial tool to identify
and analyze probable adverse environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and possible mitigation for the impacts. An EIS
is required when significant adverse environmental impacts are likely from a project, such as here, where two of the
alternatives involve a new bridge across a salmon bearing river. If a full scope EIS is undertaken, all of the alternatives in the
2016 Draft BNSF Access Study would be analyzed.
Below are the elements considered during SEPA review/analysis:
Environmental Elements for SEPA Analysis
1. Earth
2. Air
3. Water
4. Plants
5. Animals
6. Energy and Natural Resources
7. Environmental Health
8. Land and Shoreline Use
9. Housing
10. Aesthetics
11. Light and Glare
12. Recreation
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
14. Transportation
15. Public Services
16. Utilities
Scoping is the first step in the EIS process. The purpose of scoping is to narrow the focus of the EIS to significant
environmental issues, eliminate insignificant impacts from detailed study, and identify alternatives to be analyzed in the EIS.
Scoping also provides notice to the public and other agencies that an EIS is being prepared, and initiates their involvement in
the process. The result of the scoping process might be a reduced number of access alternatives and/or environmental
elements to be studied. While a narrower document will reduce costs, one that does not fully consider environmental impacts
may be more vulnerable to legal challenge.
IV. PROJECT CHALLENGES
The Project presents numerous, significant challenges. The status quo involves the 42nd Ave S bridge, which is nearing the end
of its useful life, is beyond repair and requires replacement. All potential alternatives are challenging due to overall costs, lack
of funding options for an alternative route, environmental concerns and potential litigation.
Anticipated Cost Considerations:
Option 1: Update Previous Cost Estimates: Estimated cost is $15,000 to $50,000
Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will
be approximately $15,000 to $50,000.
Option 2: EIS on all alternatives: Estimated cost is $750,000 to $900,0001
Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact application process is approximately
$750,000 to $900,000. The cost would depend on the scope, such as the number of route alternatives (or the number of
environmental elements) selected for review. The estimated timeline for completing this EIS is 18 to 24 months. This EIS would
be useful only for a certain period of time and depending on when funding was secured (if several years later due to Federal or
Updated (April 2021) cost estimate from David Evans and Associates; a limited scope EIS would be less, yet likely could still
cost between $500,000 and $750,000.
Phone; 2O6 -433-18Q0 • Email: Mayor@TukwillaWA.gov + Website: TukwilaWA.gov
28
State funding availability), it may need to be updated (supplemented) for an additional cost. A full EIS or partial EIS will both
require the City to hire a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. This brings the total
estimated costs up to $1.2 million dollars for the EIS and City staff requirements.
Option 3: Research and analyze funding options to secure future funding if feasible:
Seek via State and Federal funding for an alternative access route, once it has been defined. At this time there is a current lack
of funding for new bridges, which are proposed in two of the four alternatives, as such, there is not currently a good fit for state
and federal funding. However, the potential for a Federal infrastructure package may occur, but is unknown at this time. Nor are
the application requirements known. Those potential funds may be used to fix deteriorating infrastructure rather than `build new'.
The City will follow this closely. In addition, if a bridge was chosen as the alternate access, it will serve primarily as a bridge for
freight traffic. Access to Baker Commodities or residential use would have to be considered but may be a design challenge in
certain cases. The reality that the public will not be able to use this infrastructure, and that it will largely benefit private industry,
makes it a difficult candidate for public funding.
Project Costs
Project costs for any alternative are unknown until preliminary engineering is underway. For example, an estimated cost for the
48th Ave S. route alternative, developed in 2016, was approximately $20 million. Due to price escalation, in 2019, it was estimated
that this cost could have nearly doubled to $34M. Any estimate will need to be updated, and based on this alternative's less
than 10% design, any alternative's design would need to progress further to get a better cost estimate.
An example of a project in the City for comparison is the Strander Boulevard easterly extension into Renton, WA. That project
was originally estimated at $29 million, upon completion of design work, it was identified at $80 million. The City, even with
existing State and Federal resources, did not have the money to proceed with the project, so it was cancelled. The City had
received Federal grant funding of $5 million for the design work, but since the project was stopped, the City had to return that
funding to the Federal Government.
Potential Litigation
Due to the complexity of these alternatives, there are various entities who may challenge any of these alternatives, including
adjacent property owners, tribal governments, other city and state governments, and local businesses.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Option 1: Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the
report will be approximately $15,000 to $50,000. Please note that these cost estimates are based on a very preliminary
engineering design and are subject to change.
Option 2: Staff also estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact statement process is
approximately $750,000 to $900,000. This effort will also require a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately
$300,000 for two years. The total for Option 2 is approximately up to $1.2 million dollars.
RECOMMENDATION
It is Staffs recommendation that it would be most appropriate to proceed with Options 1 and 2.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study - Draft Alternative Screening Analysis (full draft)
Draft BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study - Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
Phone; 2O6-433-1200 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov + Website: TukwiilaWA.gov
29
30
ram a�.vvg.0 Aiperi■� w.sF
31
MARY
0
33
Airpc,rf Way
AJJarriatika
3 1:1M 3r:10.4 ,T'r
AJtarawt'ex
Mociaver-tiliumts;•
34
35
36
Areas
37
Yq:;.0 01,5..*"
:1i7aaax+Fr ns:WrApozidsr
39
IlliMCVMFMIS
40
41
plexit /
42
1
I II
ME
II I
INN
IMO
MOM
MEM
3 iax'arC,i►S•'ti !zip") AWSI
45
46
•
111
Wirf)l-LIC
• 47
•
48
U
;:`:4iliVlM11111I:wgii/i11II1Gbll11n11111111111*ii111`+
it , i ..f i,.,, ti. -&e1 41.1.1 .a1I a. _ p 11.,1.!
wnR rc
49
COPETR.IGT hEW .
AHD 16411
"ev. C r rn*ut'r Wale
PrAD VA Y
50
•
II,
51
•
RKI
52
53
•
1 54
•
C4RIDE
55
•
• 56
•
U
}
F
12
2
woRr�
57
r
I
58
l
59
60
U
VitertIZAK
61
2 1^R
62
•
Dimako TA W
4.
AIMS
I
V y )R/
63
44.
64
wc
65
•
ter
I<
66
VViCk1ZI-C
' 67
68
69
•
70
48TH AVE
ALTERNATIVE
GATEWAY DR
ALTERNATIVE
S 124TH STREET
ALTERNATIVE
•
•
S 112TH ST
ALTERNATIVE
•
•
AIRPORT WAY S
ALTERNATIVE
•
SI
/
76
ighiintodel
AJlornaLFrc
attempt!Mo
IrjrrC I
LAibs-naliv a
1 aRe nalivo
Intermodal
.AJlnrnnIi.m
rkrrll 11'011
Ifl ( R r.:n;s:
$llomeli.y
, i. . ;1#7ueli imt rehgkiltelty). Gtwemrah
h hCra:C.9,.Ai.,prucalVacue.r=rElsi u
79
Gtorwa
In#rn
�1�illi9'K�JtlI
lemalrre Gnlevwny
Duriarrigh
D
80
Inlonurtan irarmadnl
Du mi5I;
nll9rfbLi '
BNSF RAILWAY INTERMODAL FACILITY ACCESS STUDY
ALTERNATIVE SCREENING ANALYSIS REPORT
Prepared for:
City of Tukwila
Public Works Department
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98005
Prepared by:
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
14432 SE Eastgate Way
Bellevue, WA 98007
November 28, 2016
82
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Alternative Screening Analysis Report for the City of Tukwila was prepared by David Evans and
Associates, Inc. to evaluate alternative access to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway
intermodal facility in Tukwila, Washington. This facility is also known as South Seattle Yard. BNSF
Railway also sponsored this study,
The existing access to the intermodal facility uses 42nd Avenue S and 5 124th Street. 5 124th Street
is also a residential collector street serving the community of Allentown. Several residential homes
with driveways are located on S 124th Street, as is the Tukwila Community Center which houses an
aquatic center, meeting rooms, classes and activities for all ages, and playground and ball fields.
This study did not create new alternatives but used alternatives that were developed by previous
studies. A total of five alternatives were studied. Airport Way S, 5 112th Street, S 124th Street,
Gateway Drive — North Leg, and 48th Avenue S.
Several desktop researches were performed as part of this study. These researches included critical
and sensitive areas, fish and wildlife, water resources, hazardous materials, geological and soils, and
cultural and historical resources.
A scored screening matrix was developed collaboratively between the City of Tukwila, BNSF
Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. The matrix was presented to Tukwila City Council as
well as to the public for their feedback on the screening matrix criteria. The public was allowed to
provide feedback via an on-line open house and an in-person open house.
Representatives from Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. met to score
each alternative using a numerical scoring system from 1 to 9. The score for each criteria was
added, and the lowest score is the preferred alternative.
Based on the scoring result, the 48th Avenue S alternative is the preferred alternative.
PATUKA0000001310800lNFO10670RaportsISMSF Jntermodal Access Screening summary_2016•1128.docx
City of Tukwila 1 Alternative Screening Analysis
BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 2016 83
Figure 1 shows the project study area. The following provides a description for each alternative.
Figure 1— Project Study Area
r
r S )12th Street
Alternative
Head
Airport Way��i
Alternative
Valley
SBANGO SF
S 124th Street
Gateway Drive
Extension
Alternative ':'�
Gateway Cerpclrete Cetier
aTaC
xray s�;,4ld
ir.‘r PI t
4 ie -1 Avenue S
Ex -tension
Altern.1ti ve
ing•
t -y
F;111 TUKA000OO6131O&OiNFO10¢70Reparrsl9NSF IntermodarAccess Screening sumrnary_2016 1128.dbcx
City of Tukwila
BNSF Intermodal Facility Access
3 Alternative Screening Analysis
November 28, 2016 84
Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
BNSF Access Study
DRAFT — September 5, 2017
Background
In 2016, the Tukwila community provided input on the screening criteria that was used to develop the
BNSF Access Study report. The City identified a preferred alternative route and shared it with the
community at an open house on August 17, 2017.
Summary
The City of Tukwila hosted an in-person open house at the Tukwila Community Center on August 17,
2017. The in-person house accompanied an online open house, which included the same information as
the in-person open house and was available from August 15 - 28, 2017.
Notifications
The project team advertised the in-person and online open houses in early August 2017. Notifications
included the following:
• Postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods
• Emails to the City's project listsery
o Listsery includes community members, business and property owners, other interested
parties
• Flier emailed as attachment to Allentown and Duwamish neighborhood listservs by
neighborhood leaders
• Facebook and Twitter posts on the City's social media accounts
Attendance and visitor statistics
• In-person open house attendance: 42
• In-person comment forms completed: 20
• Online open house visitors: 32
• Online surveys completed: 12
• Overall number of participants: 74
Engagement Methods
In -Person Open House
The City gathered shared information about the preferred alternative and other considered alternatives
during an open house at the Tukwila Community Center on August 17, 2017, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
Participants viewed informational boards that described the project purpose, schedule, alternative and
preferred routes, screening criteria and environmental process. Project staff were on hand to answer
questions. Participants contributed comments via comment cards. Comments received at the open
house are shown in Appendix 1 and summarized below.
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
85
In-person open house participants give feedback on comment cards.
Online Open House
In order to reach Tukwila businesses and residents who were unable to attend the in-person open
house, the City advertised an online open house, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, starting
August 15 and ending August 28. The online open house included the same information as at the in-
person open house and a survey that gathered specific feedback in a similar fashion to the comment
boxes at the in-person open house. Comments received through the online open house are shown in
Appendices 2 and summarized below.
Feedback Overview
Several themes emerged from the input received through 32 comments and surveys:
• Those who supported the preferred alternative (15) stated a number of reasons for their
support, including moving the truck route to a commercial street and away from residences,
access/proximity to I-5 and current residential impacts on 124th.
• All residents who said they live along or near the current access route who participated (4)
supported moving the truck access route to another street.
• Those who opposed the preferred alternative (4) stated increased traffic, business impacts and
residential impacts as reasons for their opposition.
• Several participants urged the City to study or investigate cost (4) and traffic (3). Several
participants also expressed interest in potential environmental impacts (3).
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
86
Next Steps
All feedback presented here is being provided to the project team for consideration. The study and
proposed route will be presented to City Council in the fall of 2017.
One participant requested specific follow up regarding business impacts on 48th Ave S: Quinn Closson,
360-607-8178, qclosson@pape.com.
Appendices
1. Comments gathered at in-person open house
2. Online comments
3. Notifications
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
87
Appendix 1: Comments Gathered at In-person Open House
Note: comments are verbatim as written. Commenters were asked if they live, work or visit Tukwila.
Live Work Visit
Name
Email
Comment (verbatim)
x
Phillip
Camball
Phillameball@hotmail.com
Anything except 48th Ave S.
Minimum public $, maximum
private funding.
x
Angela Steel
angelasb13@hotmail.com
I prefer the 48th Ave S option
as the least impactful to
residential properties in
Allentown and Duwamish.
This option keeps semis on
existing truck routes w/out
creating new roads through
environmentally critical areas
or private property. *Also
need noise wall along edge of
railyard.
[unknown]
[unknown]
My first choice BNSF move out
completely. Second choice I
prefer 48th Ave S. Build wall
to control noise and shaking
control.
x
Mary Fertakis
[unknown]
Thanks for all the work that
has been done on this. The
grid was particularly helpful -
very concrete information and
easy to understand. The
original study in 1990 shows
that the 48th st option was
the least expensive and made
the most sense. It is the same
in 2017. Seems pretty clear
that this is still the direction to
go.
x
x
David
Shumate
David@propeldesins.com
The 48th Ave and Bridge looks
like the best one!
x
x
Sean Albert
seanalbert2001@hotmail.com
I think the preferred 48th ave
south route is by far the best
alternative!!
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
88
x
Patty Cokus
pcokus@hotmail.com
I agree wholeheartedly with
the preffered study route
where it impacts all identified
impact criteria the least and is
the least expensive. Thank you
for working on this and
advocating for community
input and gathering feedback.
The preferred route makes
the most sense for all.
x
[Illegible]
[unknown]
I think the preferred option
makes the most sense of
those presented. It takes the
traffic completely off
residential streets and on to a
commercial street that
already accomodates semi -
truck traffic.
x
Lucia Nilo
Itannilo@hotmail.com
I hope this project gets look at
seriously as I really enjoy my
home at 124th - but the
vibration of the trucks in and
out 24-7 is really bad and
nuisance. It shakes our house
especially when sleeping - the
NO -Build option: S 124th
should not be an option.
x
Wilfredo Nilo
wznilo@gmail.com
We live by 124th ave which is
active for semi -trucker. Since
we moved here from
september 2016 we felt a
massive vibration everytime
those truckets pass by. We
live in a brand new home and
it created major cracks in aour
garage. We worried whats
gonna happen next.
x
Oscar Uceda
o.uceda@yahoo.com
We would like to support the
prefer alternative for the
trucks route coming in and
out of the BNSF Railroad Yard
facility in Allentown.
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
89
x
x
Becky
[Illegible]
becarosep@aim.com
Concern the increase in traffic
from now and 20 years down
the road on the 48th ave
purposal. What effects it will
have on the businesses on
48th (widening roads etc)
Residents being impacted by
not being able to get access to
the businesses they already go
to.
x
Morgan
Llewellyn
mllewellyn@ccim.net
I'm wonderng how the project
will be funded particularly in
light of the right away
acquisitions required by the
preferred route. It appears the
northern route would have
the least impact on residential
AND commercial businesses.
x
Todd Jones
rain1916@comcast.net
I stronly oppose Gateway
Drive option and 124th st
options. I do like the 48th st
option or others to the north.
x
Hanice
Ludingtons
shofarJCL@gmail.com
My preference is Airport Way
x
[Illegible]
[Illegible]
The road should go out the
north end. I live on 51st
(across the street from the flat
bed trucks, and am concerned
about where the railroad will
put the road inside this yard.
Will trucks have to be
removed and trailers
[illegible]? And if so, where
will they go? It is close to our
homes, your moving one road
to another.
x
Linda
McLeod
sam.linda.mcleod@gmail.com
No on Gateway Dr. Divides
BECU campuses, has many
employees + customers
x
[unknown]
[unknown]
Airport SO. (BEST) [sic]
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
90
x
I live in 122nd st. I hope the
124th s st. would be closed as
enterence of BNSF or trucks
facility. The impact to our
Edna edna0801@gmail.com home and neighborhood is
Derr[illegible] terrible, the house vibrates
each time; lots of noise; and
traffic gets crowded. 48th st is
great alternative for the BNSB
enterence.
Steven steve@xmrine.com
We'd like to see a traffic
impact study done on
inerurban and exit 156 off 1-5.
Please go to fife and see the
issues they have and avoid
that happening to us.
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
91
Appendix 2: Comments from Online Open House
Note: comments are verbatim as written.
Comment
1. Will all trucks no longer use 124th st ? 2. Will there be entry and exit capability from 50th PL S/129th
street? we must have the capability to enter and exit from 50th PL 5/129th street. Please make sure
this option available. Thanks for your consideration
How much will this cost? What about an option to improve the 42nd st. bridge by the community
center and do some mitigation on the streets that the trucks drive down, such as widening the
shoulders of the street, side walks and maybe even some sort of sound barrier? How is this project
prioritized compared to needs in other neighborhoods such as sidewalks and road repair?
I am an employee of BECU and believe that the 48th Ave So. preferred option is by far the best choice.
Not only from a cost perspective but also from a life safety, employee/member environment and the
disruption of multiple businesses/residential and land/building value standpoint. The 48th Ave So.
option already houses a street with truck yard access and would be a much easier way to execute on
this initiative. While I know this still impacts some, it is the reasonable choice and should be adopted.
I am not only a Tukwila resident but also a Tukwila business owner that would be greatly affected by
the "preferred" route of 48th AVE S. The overall impact on the businesses along this route would be
devastating. People are already frustrated with the current amount of big trucks coming along 48th.
We are already lacking suitable gas stations in Tukwila. Please don't make them impossible to get to.
Tukwila is a growing city and the north side (Airport way) of it is already industrial. Interurban Ave is an
incredibly popular thoroughfare for many people going south/north and the 2 gas stations on 48th Ave
services more than half of those people. Please reconsider 112th or Airport way as the better
alternative that will impact our growing city the least amount. Thank you.
I am very happy that the city is analyzing other options for the truck route into the BNSF yard. The
current route is not sustainable. My family prefers the 48th Av S option since it uses an existing
commercial street and is least impactful to residential communities and the environment. I would like
you to heavily factor in the environmental impacts the other two northerly options would have on
wetlands and existing greenspaces.Will the Airport Way option impede future Light rail/Sounder
station location planning efforts? How will the different entrance options impact yard operations?
Currently, the BNSF yard is very noisy 24/7 with back up beepers. Will these operations shift or
diminish with the varying options? Can the city proceed with pursuing the noise wall installation along
the railyard boundary? I think this will make a significant improvement to the quality of life in
Duwamish and Allentown. thank you
I represent The Pape' Group, Inc. who owns the Ditch Witch dealership on 48th Ave, South. I
understand there will be significant traffic impact during construction. I don't think we're overly
concerned about that. However, I'd like a little more information on the traffic study or estimates on
additional traffic impact on 48th Ave. South after completion of the project. Also, will there be any
improvements done to the 48th Ave road itself? Finally, is there something I'm missing that you think
we should be concerned about as a business right on 48th Ave? Thanks, Quinn Closson 360-607-8178
qclosson@pape.com
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
92
I wish that this 124th St. access be change to a different access ASAP because we moved here in a new
home development last year 2016 of Sept. which we are not aware about this 124th St. right beside
our house is the major access for truckers. We encountered 24-7 of a massive vibration like an
earthquake multiple times everyday and we felt scary that our house may collapse one of this day. So
far we had a multiple long cracks in our garage and hopefully will not affect the foundation. We live
right by the stop sign where those truckers heading out from BNSF gate and also for coming in. That
really distract us everyday. There's a time when some of the truck driver lost their focus on the stop
sign especially in the evening and they made an emergency brakes and it shakes the ground so bad and
it vibrates our house also. I Believe that 48th Ave S is the best alternatives route for the truckers.
I work at BECU. The Gateway alternative would have a negative impact on our members who come
into our Tukwila Financial Center to conduct their personal business (primarily retail banking, trust
services, and investment services). We are about to engage on a Gateway campus upgrade and a truck
route cutting through the middle of it would have a negative impact on our employee experience and
may have a negative impact on our ability to recruit and retain employees. Given the existing land use
abutting most of your preferred alternative (gas stations, commercial, etc.). I can see the potential
noise downside for a hotel (but it's already next To 1-5 and a busy off ramp so marginal impact seems
moderate).
I would like to avoid having another bridge over the river and prefer this option: S 112th Street Thank
you.
Thank you for considering all options and explaining the reasoning. What timeframe are you looking at
for construction of the new bridge and roadway. What impact will there be on the existing Interurban
Bike/Walking Trail both during construction and upon completion. Will traffic studies be done to work
on minimalizing impact at the intersection for traffic on Interurban and from the off ramp on 15?
This route makes the most sense as it is a quick, direct route off of 1-5, drives through a commercial
area only and does not affect the public's experience of their greenspace, except for a small segment
of the bike trail. I fully support this preferred route.
What are the costs? How it will be funded?
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
93
Appendix 3: Notifications
Social media
City of Tukwila - Government
Auouvt v 21 3.34,'m 10
Join us for a BNSF Access Study Project Open House on August 17, 2017
The City of Tukwila has identified 48th Ave S as the preferred route to
access the BNSF Railway Intermodal Facility in Allentown_ Before the route
is formally decided_ we're holding an Open House and online forum to talk to
you about the route that we selected based on the criteria you helped us
shape.
BNSF Access Study Project Open House
Thursday, August 17, 2017
5:30 - 7:30 p.m.
Tukwila Community Center
2424 42nd Ave S, Tukwila, WA 981€B
Can't make it to the open house? Share your thoughts online!
Now through August 28, 2017, you can share your thoughts at
https:ifTukBNSFAccess.Participate.Onhine All information from the Open
House will be online. Translation options are available.
Email us at AccessStudytukwilawa.gov or call 206-433-0179 with any
questions.
CITY OF TUKWILA
BNSF Access Study Project
1i Like
3
Comment
TN Ccr a+ir l.,aW lu4 Kim nikni oleos *. S es tNe wrened rdVat to amer% H.e
NIS<-punm4d.1 f I,ra n ii-rtimet, Waft) Ike Cdr' , lue'> 68e rf.Q
!srk'Le t m Op.n tlo4,ve ora isle: raum PU oaf 4D, . bt .. On, * R* the
+r :+ es ted based sr. nhr 4rir'1 u•. alup*
arrival and moadrna.1 an #n p.aa,+ad OF, ma 0,ea darebr
3. awn tloaw
Auputt
S ya a *CI Rau
Lob imam iCor dM110/ p Gllrelpt
17411 by! Ave t Tutta i, 11164II1U
1#eir ons,wrf0 , loam WaifI*prene,d aill rnnti elvure
o_hr ene.ronrttrfHnJproem pglsnit a soar rntorapher
Onir Annan
More dkrpuab Aurae.33, 2d}'T, law can ,Lara tourihpuRhts seYa.a.
ya,e Mapr//ftr oAftec..t n..rrrs... yVHnr
ra.aaar
*► Share
3 shares
Facebook post published August 9, 2017.
Top Comments F
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
94
C4) City of Tukwila G @,CityofTuk-wila , Aug 9
Join us for a BNSF Access Study Project Open House on August 17, 2017
CITY OF TUKWILA
B NSF Access Study Project
tlir cttw or tvtwea l+as #pb Owe 5 ac ah! preferred mum u Accoss n+.
Off Ita.lwap bite modal tpoigtt? Ai.rinrrn. 19141:117. th. rout i ormaiy drw se/.
WOW halom'e an Cpin Home part arJrga tuner. tip oat m raw ab Elul tfs
%or We -nod based or the crentin •I. nolgi.d us s1+.mae
wbi. and ci rmerr. on the preferred SIM' ni1 a anile.
L Open House
Tia r,4 . Autiui5 17, 2261)
5 ip 7! rldt
7
ukt.114 Corketiamieg CORM
12424 wen Are 5, Tukwila, WA 9B1M
•rrr.or Fortjao oprif irons at+Ier rlar porfiefmt ttaP'+r hoer remale .nC
the cfPneR talpl. PtAA 1140ie &sir rMPsoll i.
2 QlrMr',
rtirsorr
New through .04061. at ZI, 21a17, WA/ LIM abate teat itra ihn anllnel
Visit .Tel .5.!1i1 115FAczel2-.0,onidpate.0n11+te
r'ta hrlimmarVolo [ow illi COY,►f9,44,[ WaY be wine pro t!lPriatt clomp Qui
asegaritOr.
2
Tweet published August 9, 2017.
Postcard
CITY OF TUKWILA
BNSF Access Study Project
The City has identified 48th Ave 5 as the preferred route to access the BNSF yard in
Allentown. Before the route is formally decided, we're holding an open house and
online forum to talk to you about the route that we selected based on the trite'';
you helped us shape,
Review and comment on the preferred alternative route:
1. In person
Thursday, August 17, 2017
5:30 - 7:30 p.m.
Tukwila Community Center
12424 42nd Ave 5, Tukwila, WA 98168
Meet project staff learn about the preferred alternative route and
environmental process, and shore your thoughts.
2. Online
Now through August 28, you can share your thoughts online!
Visit TukBNSFAccess.Particlpate.OnIine
Ali information from the in-person event will be online. Tronslathon options are
available.
Questions?
Email us at Accessstudy@tukwitawa.gov tar call 206-433-0179.
One side of a postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods.
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
95
CITY OF TUKWILA
BNSF Access Study Project
Public Works Administration
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Review and comment on the
preferred alternative route,
48th Ave S
in person
Thursday, August 17, 2017
5:30 to 7:30 p.m.
Tukwila Community Center
Online
TukB NS FAccess. Pa rtici pa te.O n I i ne
Reverse of a postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods.
Emails
Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary
DRAFT
96
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Meeting
Remote Meeting per Governor Proclamation 20-28 June 14, 2021 — 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES
This meeting was conducted remotely, with the City Council, Mayor, and staff off-site and
participating via a remote electronic system.
All participants, including the Mayor, Councilmembers, City staff, and legalcounsel wxxeno/at
Tukwila City Hall and participated via a remote electronic system.
The phone number for public participation that was provided via the agenda distribution process
was: 1-253-292-9750, access code 670077847# as well as a link to join the Microsoft Teams
Meeting.
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council President Kruller called the remote Tukwila City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the
audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
OFFICIALS
Present at the virtual meeting were Council President Kruller; Councilmembers Verna Seal,
Kathy Hougardy, De'Sean Quinn, Thomas McLeod, Zak [clan, Cynthia Delostrinos Johnson.
CITY OFFICIALS
Allan Ekberg, MayorRachel Bianchi, Deputy City AdministratorNora Gierloff, Community Development
Director; Vicky Carlsen, Finance Director; Juan PadiUa, Human Resources Director; Eric Dreyer, Police
Chief; Mindi Mattmon, Emergency Manager; Jay Wittwer, Fire Chief; Norm Golden, Deputy Fire Chief; Ben
Hayman, Fire Marshal; Tracy Gallaway, Acting Parks & Recreation Director; Hari Ponnekanti, Public
Works Director; Cyndy Knighton, Senior Public Works Program Manager; Joel Bush, Chief Technology
Officer; Laurel Humphrey, Legislative Analyst; Andy Youn, Deputy City Clerk.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Council President Kruller stated "The City of Tukwila is located on the ancestral lands of the Coast Salish
people. We acknowledge their continuing connections to land, waters and culture. We pay our respects to
their elders past, present and emerging."
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Those wishing to provide public comment had the opportunity to deliver public comments by signingup
via email by 5:00 p.m. today to have the comments read or state them verbally at the virtual meeting.
There were no public comments.
PUBLIC HEARING
A resolution adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program.
7:03 p.m. Council President Kruller opened the public hearing and called for a staff report.
Cyndy Knihton.GeniorProBnamK8mnmge[exoeineddlisresoudonedoptstheennua|updatauftheSix-
Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for 2022-2027 as required by State law. The proposed
TIP adds five pjects and removes one pject because it is expected to be completed before July 1,
2021.
97
Tukwila City CouncCommittee of the Whole Minutes
June 14, 2021 Page 2of5
7:07 p.m. Council President Kruller called for public comments.
There were no public comments.
Council President Kruller asked if there was anyone else who wished to make a public comment on this
topic and to press *6 on the phone to unmute. There were no additional public comments.
7:08 p.m. Council President Kruller closed the public hearing.
SPECIAL ISSUES
a. A resolution adopting the 2022-2027 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program.
CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING.
b. Weekly COVID-19 Report.
RacheBianchi, Deputy City Administrator, provided an update on the City's coronavirus response as
follows: Human services continues to assist households with rental assistance; data is available on
programs such as Park n' Play, Senior Meals, and Tukwila pantry; Per a request from Councilmember
Quinn, vaccine data by region and age has been included in the report
Following a request from Councilmember Delostrinos Johnson, Ms. Bianchi relayed King County Public
Health — Seattle & King County continues to partner with the City to vaccinate communities that are not at
the 70% vaccinated threshold.
Based on a question from Council President Kruller, K8indi K8attsnn, Emergency Manager, confirmed the
request to extend the National Guard's assistance at Tukwila Pantry has been denied. Volunteers are
being trained and a contingency plan is in place.
c. Emergency Management Update:
(1) An update on the Emergency Management Program Work Plan.
(2) A resolution to become a signatory of the Regional Coordination Framework for resource
sharing during a disaster.
Mindi Mattson, Emergency Manager, provided an overview of the City's Emergency Management
Program and the Regional Coordination Framework which establishes a cooperative platform between
different agencies to address emergency assistance and sharing of information and resources during a
disaster or major planned event within King County. The proposed resolution adds the City as a signatory
to the Regional Coordinator Framework.
CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THE RESOLUTION TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING.
d. An update and Council Consensus on the Fire Advisory Task Force and funding request for
consultation services.
Norm Golden, Deputy Fire Chief, provided an update on the activities of the Fire Advisory Task Force that
was formed following the recommendations from the Center for Public SafetManagement (CPSM)
Report. The task force is seeking approval to onboard consultants Bill Cushion and Kareen Reed, who
both have extensive local experience working with emergency services. There will be simultaneous
implementation of a recruitment process to ensure an effective task force with membership that is
representative of the community.
Councilmember Wan asked for a list of budget amendments to date.
Based on a question from Councilmember McLeod, Mayor Ekberg shared City Administrator David Cline
learned of consultants Bill Cushman and Karen Reed through outreach to other jurisdictions.
98
Tukwila City CouncCommittee of the Whole Minutes
June 14, 2021 Page 3 of 5
Based on a question from Councilmember Seal, Vicky Cedsen, Finance Director, indicated a budget
amendment will be required to fund the request for consultant services that will come out of the General
Fund.
Following an inquiry from Council President Kruller, Mr. Golden confirmed the consultants have extensive
experience working with agencies to retain fire services within the organization in addition to other options
such as contracting for services, annexing to a current agency, and forming Regional Fire Authorities.
CONSENSUS EXISTED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTATION SERVICES AND
TIMELINE FOR ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY FIRE ADVISORY TASK FORCE.
e. An update and Council Consensus on options for BNSF Alternative Access Study.
Han Ponnekanti, Public Works Director, provided an update on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)
Intermodal Facility Access Study that reviews alternate routes for a new truck traffic route. Staff is seeking
Council approval on Options 1 and 2 as outlined in the informational memorandum: (1) To update the
David Evans contract to revise previous cost estimates in the report for the amount of $15,000 to
$50,000; and (2) To complete an environment impact statement process which will cost approximately
$750,000 to $900,000, in addition to hiring a term -limited Pject Manager for $300,000 for two years.
Councilmember Seal reported the Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee discussed
pursuing Option 3 (research and analysis of funding options) whenever feasible.
Following a question from Councilmember Hougardy regarding funding sources, Mr. Ponnekanti
explained funding sources could include a waste management surcharge for roads and road -related
projects, bond issues, use of general funds, American Rescue Plan Act funds, or a combination of the
above.
Based on a question from Council President Kruller, Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administrator, shared
the City has been in communication with Allentown residents and intends to hold a community meeting in
the near future. The term -limited Project Manager proposed through Option 2 will also be responsible for
interacting with the community.
CONSENSUS EXISTED TO PROCEED WITH OPTIONS 1 AND 2 AS OUTLINED IN THE AGENDA
DOCUMENTATION.
REPORTS
a. Mayor
Mayor Ekberg shared the Tukwila, City of Opportunity Scholarships were presented to awardees at the
virtual Foster High School Awards Night.
b. City Council
Councilmember Seal reported the Tranand Infrastructure Services Committee forwarded 3
items to the next Regular Meeting Consent Agenda: The Public Works Shops Minkler Restroom Remodel
Project, the Public Works Shops Fence and Gates Pject, and Transportation Demand Management
Program Regional Mobility Grant Program Award. The Committee also discussed trash pickup and graffiti
cleanup and received an update on the Public Works Tenant Improvements project. There will be a page
on the City website that will have contacts listed for issues with illegal dumping and graffiti.
Councilmember Hougardy attended a Sound Cities Association Women in Leadership meeting today
where they discussed the impacts of the pandemic on women.
Councilmember Quinn thanked the Council President and Laurel Humphray, Legislative Analyst, for their
hard work on the recent Council retreat. He relayed a recent incident in Allentown in which a semi -truck
99
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
June 14, 2021 Page 4 of 5
was at risk of damaging a resident's home. Public Works will be reviewing the matter. He thanked the
Tukwila Police Department on behalf of neihborhood community safety teams for their coordination on a
recent event.
Councilmember McLeod thanked the Council President and Ms. Humphrey for the recent Council retreat.
The King County Growth Management Planning Council is continuing work on countywide Planning
Policies for which he is submitting amendments relating to jurisdictional responsibilities.
Councilmember Idan thanked the Council President for facilitating the Council retreatHe reported the
Finance and Governance Committee continued discussion on prioritizing restoration of service levels in
the City, technology options for the Council Chambers and Council Committee conference rooms, and
marijuana tax revenue which has been shelved due to conversations happening at the State level. The
Committee opted to pursue Option 3, modernization of all technology for the Council Chambers and
Committee rooms.
Councilmember Delostrinos Johnson thanked the Council President and Ms. Humphrey for an inspiring
Council retreat.
Council President Kruller attended a Housing Development Consortium meeting regarding permanent
supportive housing as well as a presentation by the Cascade Water Alliance regarding the history and
future of water supply. She participated in a Transportation Policy Board meeting through the Puget
Sound Regional Council, a Public Issues Committee meeting through Sound Cities Association, and a
Sound Cities Association Women in Leadership meeting. She attended the grand soft opening of the
Holden Southcenter, an assisted living community. Council President Kruller thanked the Council for their
patience with the Council retreat.
c. Staff
Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administratoroffered a reminder on the Inaugural Juneteenth
Commemoration that will begin June 19, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. on ExperienceTukwila.com. She thanked all
those who have worked on the project.
MISCELLANEOUS
Councilmember [clan asked what could be done to support the Duwamish Tribe in their efforts to gain
federal re -recognition.
Laurel Humphrey, Legislative Analyst, shared Cecile Hansen, Chairwoman of the Duwamish Tribe, wrote
to her today and shared the link to sign a petition for federal recognition that she will forward to the
Council.
Councilmember McLeod encouraged the Council to reach out to Representative Adam Smith in addition
to signing the petition.
Council President Kruller suggested placing this as an item on a future Committee Services and Safety
Committee agenda.
Councilmember Quinn indicated he looks forward to more opportunities to engage with Chairwoman
Hansen at a Council or Committee meeting.
100
Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes
June 14, 2021
Page 5 of 5
ADJOURNMENT
9:15 p.m. COUNCIL PRESIDENT KRULLER DECLARED THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MEETING ADJOURNED.
Kat- , C uncil President
If.aytft2.2,2,21Mr,0114.,11,,W.I.A.E4,
Andy Youn, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT: 6/25/21
AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEBSITE: 6/28/21
101