Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit PL13-023 - E13-011 TUKWILA VILLAGE ASSOCIATES - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
TUKWILA VILLAGE TIB & S 144T" ST PL13-023 L13-0044 DESIGN REVIEW E13-011 SEPA L13-030 DESIGN REVIEW L13-031 SEPC PERMISSION L13-021 LAND DIVISION E13-011 SEPA King County Wastewater Treatment Division Community Services and Environmental Planning King Street Center, KSC-NR-0505 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 August 14, 2013 gls 16 2413 Jack Pace, Director, Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Tukwila Village, E13-011 SEPA, L13-021, L13-030, and L13-031 Dear Mr. Pace: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Application dated August 7, 2013, for the Notice of Decision; to construct mixed used project comprised of five buildings that will be constructed in three phases. King County requires that a capacity charge be applied to any project that constructs a new connection to the sewer system, any reconnection within five years of a disconnection, or any change in use or building remodel that includes an increase in plumbing fixtures. King County generally receives notice of new construction; however, some sewer districts and/or the cities that represent them have neglected to report changes in use and tenant improvements that involve an increase in plumbing fixtures. In an attempt to remedy this problem, we are sending this reminder to you in response to the Notice of Application. We ask that you forward this reminder to the sewer district or city department responsible for Sewer Use Certification forms: Please complete and send a Non -Residential Sewer Use Certification form for the above projects to the King County Capacity Charge Program in a timely manner. The form should be sent to Ericka Stewart, Capacity Charge Program, KSC-NR-0502, at the address above. If you need additional forms or have questions about the program, please call Ms. Stewart at 206-684-1060. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Sincerely, 1 B1 lana Ocheke-Ameh Water Quality Planner I Community Services and Environmental Planning cc: Ericka Stewart, Project Manager, Capacity Charge Program CREATING RESOURCES FROM WASTEWATER City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Notice of Decision To: Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC c/o Bryan Park (Parties of Record, list each) Valley View Sewer District King County Water District 125 Tukwila School District Seattle City Light Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Qwest Communications Comcast King County Metro Waste Management State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor Project: Tukwila Village File numbers: E13-011 SEPA Associated files: L13-021 - Lot Consolidation; L13-030 - Design Review; L13-031 - Special Permission Parking Variance; Applicant: Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC Request: Tukwila Village is a mixed used project comprised of five buildings that will be constructed in three phases. Phase 1 is Building A that is five stories with 80 total housing units; 4 live work units and commercial services/retail floor area at grade; and two levels of structured parking below grade. Included in this phase is a stand-alone one-story, 4,210 square foot community building - Building C - with an adjacent 27,000 square foot outdoor community space. Phase 1 occurs north of S. 144 Street and includes internal driveways, surface parking, landscaping and street frontage improvements along Tukwila International Boulevard and 5.144 Street. Phase 2, all occurring south of S. 144 Street, includes two mixed use buildings (Building D and E)and surface parking and landscaping. Building D is five stories of 70 total housing units over one story of commercial office space and one level of below grade structured parking. Building E is four stories of 124 total housing units over structured parking and commercial/retail street front uses including a City of Tukwila Police Resource Office. Phase 3 is Building B that is four stories of 125 total senior housing units over one level of at grade structured parking and 1,800 commercial/retail space. A separate parcel in the northeast corner of the intersection of S. 144 Street and Tukwila International Boulevard is reserved for a new 10,000 square foot one story Tukwila Library. The librar6is being developed separately by the King County Library System, but will share parking and utility connections with the Tukwila Village development. Location: 6.4 acres east of Tukwila International Boulevard and north and south of S. 144 Street and including 21 tax parcels and 41 Avenue S., a public street proposed for vacation. Decision: This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist, additional reports and agreements, staff report and the underlying permit applications. Project materials related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Moira Carr Bradshaw who may be contacted at (206) 431-3670 for further information. The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). List of Documents/Information Submitted with Applications 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. List of Tax Parcel Numbers Updated Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. March 18, 2013) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Associated Earth Sciences, Inch November 30, 2011) Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. November 22, 2011) Tukwila Village Development Proposal Project Description May 28, 2013 Plat Closure for Proposed Parcels A, B, C, D and E. Concurrency Test Notice Surface Water Certificate of Sewer Availability Valley View Sewer District 9. Certificate of Water Availability King County Water District #125 10. Tukwila Village Phase 1 Response to Design Review Criteria 11. Traffic Impact Analysis (Parametrix, May 28, 2013) 12. Arborist Report (Tina Cohen, Northwest Arborvitae, September 16, 2011) 13. Technical information Report with Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Preliminary geotechnical Engineering Report (AES, Inc. 9/20/2011) (Barghausen, May 22, 2013) 14. SEPA Checklist (Park, May 28,2013) 15. Disposition and Development Agreement, Tukwila Contract/Agreement 12-129 City Council Approval 10/22/2012 W:\Long Range Projects\Tukwila Village \PL13-023\NOD - SEPA .doc Page 2 of 2 ell* of J usswiea Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Mailing requested by: Moira Bradshaw Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting x Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _7th day of _August _, _2013_ Project Name: Tukwila Village Project Number: PL13-023 Associated File Number (s): E13-011 Mailing requested by: Moira Bradshaw Mailer's signature: 7)// r /e W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. SHORELINE NOD REQUIRES RETURN RECEIPT 044 Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically ( ) Office of Attorney General ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner 44 ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation kiKC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle �( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( .) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque KC Public Library System Foster Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES 0- Westfield Mall Library 0...4 Tukwila School District ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District QWEST Communications Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept (—XComcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline j4Val-Vue Sewer District ) Water District # 20 11 Water District # 125 City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist () Seattle Public Utilities 'Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Planning ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) City Clerk ( ) Finance ( ) Building ( ) Mayor Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ('i'uget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) ✓� SEPA Checklist (filled out byapplicant), Drawing§/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. W from PMT'S).,..,i 'davit of Disfribufion (notice wasmaWTedoor sen(to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date of filing with DOE) — Notice to DOE must be by return receipt requested mail (this requirement included in SSB 5192, effective 7-22-11). Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (printed out from PermitsPlus) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist First Email Address Sara Sara.Edwards©4culture.orq Raya Raya.Leary(a)4culture.orq Deb Debra.Twersky©4culture.orq Abdirisak abubakrdirector©gmail.com Alli aliahmed4@,msn.com Rita ritamayeuxcc'D,msn.com Laura lara.davisc artscorps.orq Scott scottbabeacondevgroup.com Todd toddb©bergerpartnership.com Jackson yelina©billybaroos.com Al alsalliep@aol.com Cherilyn cherilyn73 cr,comcast.net Terrence proctor a(�.cbsr.orq Cynthia chesakcj@hotmail.com Trisha trishagilmore@yahoo.com Brian bkenn89310@aol.com Joe Joe.Duffie a,TukwilaWA.gov Allan AIIan.Ekberg©TukwilaWA.gov 4920 S. 161st St Kathy Kathy. Hougardy©TukwilaWA.gov Kate Kate. Kruller@TukwilaWA.gov Desean DeSean.Quinn(a,TukwilaWA.gov Dennis Dennis. Robertson cr,TukwilaWA.gov Verna Verna.Seal©TukwilaWA.gov Dylan dylanflesch©gmail.com Sharon sjkfriend anhotmail.com Steve francisoaacomcast.net Marie marieparrishamindspring.com Jim Jim.Haggerton@TukwilaWA.gov Todd tcutts(a)ci.seatac.wa.us Kate kkaehny©ci.seatac.wa.us Jeff jrobinson@ci.seatac.wa.us Dana Dana.Almberg©TukwilaWA.gov Moira Moira. Bradshaw©TukwilaWA.gov Pat Pat.Brodin an,TukwilaWA.gov David David.Cline@TukwilaWA.gov Bill B.Devlin@TukwilaWA.gov Eric Eric.Drever@TukwilaWA.gov Rebecca Rebecca. Fox a(�,TukwilaWA.gov Stacy Stacy. Hansen@TukwilaWA.gov Melissa Melissa.Hart@TukwilaWA.gov Laurel Laurel. Humphrey a©TukwilaWA.gov Katherine Katherinec seattlesouthside.com Bruce B.Lintonc TukwilaWA.gov Kimberly Kimberly. Matej©TukwilaWA.gov Lynn Lynn.Miranda@TukwilaWA.gov Stacia Stacia.Norris@TukwilaWA.gov Christy Christy.OFlaherty a(�TukwilaWA.gov Jack Jack.Pace(a)TukwilaWA.gov Chris Chris. Partman(a�TukwilaWA.gov Cheryl Cheryl.Thompson c(DTukwilaWA.gov Mike M.ViIIa(TukwilaWA.gov Joyce Joyce.Trantina(c(c�TukwilaWA.gov Evie Evie.Boykan(c�TukwilaWA.gov Stephanie Stephanie.Gardner(cr�TukwilaWA.gov Rick Rick.Still(a�TukwilaWA.gov Elizabeth emorgancollinswoerman.com Shirley shirleyb(c�commoncroundwa.orq Pete Pete.Mills(a�mail.house.ciov Matt Matt.Perry(c�mail.house.gov Kathryn kathrynkrygier@gmail.com Dave davesieminskiyahoo.com Dave davecrgrealty.com Maude maudes(a�djc.com Tom Terence terryqaduralasthomes.com Scott scotteaglerockventures.com Arash edgewoodaptcomcast.net Miguel associatea,elcentrodelaraza.orq Doris Mike mikeoverbeckexcite.com Rune runehAkiddermathews.com Duane dmiller(a�flahertycollins.com Chris choffer@forterra.org Skye skyes@cascadeland.org Georgia Paul psinluv(a�yahoo.com Faisa kaalanio c(Dgmail.com Adam Adam.Taylor(a�kingcounty.gov Diana dolsen@HealthPointCHC.org Debbie dwilkinsoncc'7HealthPointCHC.orq Lisa lyohalem@HealthPointCHC.org Matt mhoffman@htland.com Brandon hidefcutshotmail.com Natalie happilynatalie@gmail.com Dexter braveheartseven@aol.com Eric hteditor@robinsonnews.com Rachel rm.lusby(a�comcast.net Jenna smithjk70 c(yahoo.com Jay jay(a�jaymarcdevelopment.com Tony tonyh(cjohnIscott.com Diana dianaktc'D,johnsonbraund.com AJ AJ.McClure@kingcounty.gov Maria mshatcher(c�kcls.org 2420 2nd Ave 4301 Norpoint Way NE, 15-D Darth denielsen@kcIs.org Bill Billp@kcIs.org Adrianne akralph aakcls.orq Barbara barreich@kcls.org John jsheller@kcIs.orq Greg ggsmith(a,kcIs.org Jennifer jlwiseman@kcls.org Jeanne ithorsen(a,kcIs.orq Karen kstrue@gmaii.com Hari qhadia hari@hotmail.com Ramesh rameshrabadia22@hotmail.com Sharon sharonl@lihi.org 2407 1st Ave, Ste 200 Bob Robert.Comiskey@partners.mcd.com Mike Mike@mcmcondos.com Mohammed Abdiwali@minimaxtax.com Rob mtv.rob@gmail.com Site Manager Eleanor ecarnay@murase.com Matthew mlandkamer@nbbj.com John john@newhometrends.com www.newhometrends.com DS dssobocinski@comcast.net Josh joshadsbinvestments.com James normandycourta@comcast.net 1225 42nd Ave S Amy couturestudio@gmail.com Pam pamwen@juno.com Julie jcontests@gmail.com SHEILA SHEILABTHERE a@AOL.COM Shirley shirley6504@comcast.net Sylvia sylvia.davila@realpage.com Rhonda rhdoug100@hotmail.com Ron gman07@comcast.net Antwon truebarber@gmail.com Bill bfortunato@pacland.com Jeri jerber40@hotmail.com Terry harveys mama@comcast.net 15165 Sunwood Blvd., #C-23 Ellen Ingnglragmail.com Susan & Chris susanq@comcast.net John deltaiv@comcast.net Dinah dinah herring@cable.comcast.com Aaron brieaaron@comcast.net Natalie natalie.hunter@seattle.gov Reuf zagradr@msn.com Kylene kylene@berryneonsigns.com Laura laurako()live.com 3452 22nd Ave West Japhet ikoteen@gmail.com Doug dlarson@htland.com Lori lorileberer(a,netscape.net Roy rIewis(a�triadassociates.net Ana Maria malaiermom2014(a�gmail.com Patti pmaltsberger2000(a�yahoo.com Orrin nIgmcomcast.net Heather hmcleland(a�comcast.net suada kalebgadiid(a�vahoo.com Raymond k2rmorrow@aol.com David davidm a(�columbiapartners.com Kathy kathy(a vernonpublications.com J. Mvlanicolas(a�yahoo.com Kaelene kaenobis a(�vahoo.com Kelli kellio526 a(�yahoo.com Amy amyandliz anhotmail.com Heather quantumfoamatb(c�gmail.com Don Marie marie.ramirez(cr�kingcounty.gov Blaine blainereeder(a�hotmail.com Shannon shannon.renner(a�comcast.net Nolita olynoli@yahoo.com Jacques uwiacques(a�gmail.com Deborah druaneffres.com shariffa ssabrie(agmail.com Philip pcsand(a�gmail.com Deb sorensen.d(a portseattle.orq Nancy nancysprk(c�aol.com Diane dianeskcha.orq Pam pi.2006 angmail.com Heidi heidi rosewatters(a�hotmail.com Paige paige.weinheimergmail.com Marilyn mjw305comcast.net Leta boopgirI2000(a@yahoo.com Jeff Bart bbrynestadpanattoni.com Loren Dan danielparkstoneinvestments.com Ahmed ahmed.abdille(a�gmail.com Henry ismarvin a(�earthlink.net Chuck chuckparrish2009@cimail.com Harpal Matthew matthew c(Dgblre.com Kaylee Joe joe a(�realsolutions.biz Amina aminarewa.org Nimo amaatulah(cDgmail.com Hafso hafso.abdulla(a�vahoo.com Jama anurjama(a�vahoo.com Sean seanalbert2001(a�hotmail.com Southcenter Rotary? 14120 34th PI S 2316 E Howell St. 4023 S 114th St. Brooke Barbara Barbara Sharon Jerry Patti Jim Esther Lillian Laura Leslie Pam Annomae Cynthia John Belinda Audrey Virginia Katrina Richard Ray & Lillian Jaime & Eva James Christian Bill & Pat Jeff Cheri Maxine Joan Stacy Donna Kathy Linda Joel & Sophia Devlon & Tracey Tek Georgina Mary Scott Ron & Nancy Roger Janice Nicole Sheila Sharon Dwight & Nancy Sam + Linda bmarie2@earthlink.net barbarabader@live.com barbarabader@live.com sharonmyklebust@gmail.com baroh5@aol.com iimbernhard@worldnet.att.net Iilysturf@gmail.com Iesliecampbell2@comcast.net pmcarter@ips.net chesakc@tukwila.wednet.edu johncruce@hotmail.com belindacuellar777@yahoo.com virginiadelay@comcast.net Katrinadohn@gmail.com 23dunbar@comcast.net e ganoza@yahoo.com lirrmloyer22@comcast.net gorjance@aol.com jeffmgriff@comcast.net 14718 58th ave s 3128 S 149th St 13701 43rd Place South 14442 46th Ave S 5163 S. 170th St. 16037 45th Ave S. cmjoanh@aol.com hillinnium@hotmail.com eastbaylighting@comcast.net KJHougardy@conncast.net linda.ireland@ssamarine.com yoelbenruben@msn.com devlonjcc-�.hotmail.com tek kafle@yahoo.com qeorgina-on-the-Duwamish@comcast.net betsy-k@comcast.net 13802 Military Road lambtownwest@comcast.net comcast.net yinemess@comcast.net cola1dew2@sahoo.com Malbrain53@yahoo.com sharon mann(a,msn.com d-I-mclean@msn.com sam.linda.mcleod@gmail.com Vern & Joan 4431 S 148th Ted tedichu(c�hotmail.com Ethan emolsee(a�gmail.com Edna Sunny sunnymulholland(a�hotmail.com Steve & Bonnie mulletsvillemsn.com Diane tedichu(a�hotmail.com Sharon Myklebust(c�gmail.com Sharon Bryan nelsonbubbas aC�gmail.com Jeff Lance weelzhotmail.com Bruce b-paquettecomcast.net Sallie alsalliep cC�aol.com Patricia patperry@comcast.net Lynn LynnP4321 c(comcast.net 15185 62nd Ave S Mary Desean deseanquinngmail.com 4636 S 150th St Dana danaramsmsn.com 14040 33rd Ave S. Simone RobersonCSMSN.com Beverly Sonya & Art asrosengrenyahoo.com 4022 S. 150th St. Sean dertiqergmail.com Carol Jeff ►eff@mapleapts.com Sue needlewit a(,msn.com Tasolo tsimpson16(a�hotmail.com Ruth Terra terra 100str(a�comcast. net Louise Ihstrander(a�hotmail.com PO Box 88636 Richard RLSPLUSVLS(c�comcast.net John jtakamicomcast.net Daryl dtolympic(cr7yahoo.com Peter John & Darleene darleene30(a�comcast.net Jerry jerrythornton(a�waterdistrict125.com Kelli greenrosel0(ci)msn.com Charles uwcharliet a(�vahoo.com Linda Lindawkcha.org Mike Mikewisomedia.com 14864 Tukwila International Blvd Arlene Richard & Heather rcwieser(a�comcast.net Emily emilya57(cDcomcast.net 1700 53rd Ave S Paul paem2005comcast.net Laurie Laurietukaol.com Don dllovd(a�rushforth.com Mike MikelHsabey.com Monica monica manthevhermanmiller.com c� Meghan Meghan.Pinch@seattle.gov Build Smart Manager Jeff 1904 Third Ave., #710 Janice secretgardenstat@aol.com Shawn sboyd a(�sgi-usa.orq Bryan bryanphousing4seniors.com Bryan bryanp6550comcast.net Jay iaywhousing4seniors.com Tom tomroush(a�skylineproperties.com Barbara info(a�sococulture.org Abshir abshir.mahamed(c�gmail.com Osman talyan2001@yahoo.com Erin erinzdi(a�aol.com Brenna barnesenswkcc.orq barnessen c(�swkcc.orq Carol CKolson(a)swkcc.orq Ricardo Ricardo(a7memusic.com Mel mele@thelastudio.net Jessica jessicam@thelastudio.net Chris chrisp@thelastudio.net Rick rick(a�forschler.org 13529 Military Road S Joe JoeS@sabey.com Louise tukwilaheritagectr(a�tukwilahistory.org Dennis dboxkentreporter.com Steve shunter a(�tukwilareporter.com Ellen emorrison(a�rentonreporter.com Polly pshepherd@kentreporter.com Dean dradford(a%tukwilareporter.com. 425-255-3484, Ext 5150 Mary mfertakis(ccomcast.net Kathleen ciantzk(a@tukwila.wednet.edu Melody matthesm(c�tukwila.wednet.edu Linda sebringl cr tukwila.wednet.edu Gary gic3839(cr�aol.com Dawn store.418 c(r�unifiedretailer.com Ron UCPLLCaol.com PO box 1935 James james@washingtoncash.org Gylan cigreen a(�washingtoncash.orq Exec Director Beto Latino Program Director Dorothy francis219@comcast. net Carmen carmen. m. moore(cr�wellsfargo.com Loretta Loretta.Shindler@wellsfargo.com Mon monwig(a�wigproperties.com Nancy coogannptukwila.wednet.edu Dawit dawittaveAyahoo.com Mary marywitvisuals.com Jerri jplumridge@seedseattle.org Mychal konakaicoffee(a�yahoo.com Irene thebalbuenafamily(a�comcast. net Ryan Paul and Shirley Wayne and Jenny Elaine Patty ryanflesch(cilyahoo.com pscovenant1960 aC�msn.com jennyroseanne(a�gmail.com meayotte(cDcomcast. net kpphavong(c�yahoo.com City oferukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter B oulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: http://www.TukwilaWA.gov DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E13-011 Applied: 06/13/2013 Issue Date: 08/07/2013 Status: APPROVED Applicant: TUKWILA VILLAGE ASSOCIATES LLC Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: The proposed Tukwila Village Development is mixed-use, three -phased development of a site owned by the City of Tukwila located at the northeast corner and the southeast corner of the intersection of Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 144th Street. The proposal is to develop four mixed use buildings, as well as a public outdoor open space (the "Community Plaza") and a public indoor community building coupled with a private Cafe / Coffee Shop (collectively, the "Community Commons Building" - or Bldg. C), which will occur on a separate Development Parcel known as the "Plaza Parcel." The four multi -story mixed use Buildings A, B, D and E will provide a total of 403 housing units and approximately 28,000 square feet of commercial/office/community resource square footage. The four mixed use buildings all contain structured parking. Landscpaing, driveways, private amenity spaces, service areas, street frontage improvements and surface parking are also included. The site's accessory uses and utlities will serve the southwest corner of the north block, which will be owned and is being developed by King County Library System. A new 10,000 square foot neighborhood library is proposed to replace the existing Foster Libary at 4060 S 144 Street. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: 14242 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BL TUKW 1523049096 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by'U j�o��� . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Jack Pa , Responsibl Official City of ►' kwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Date if.-DJ3 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNS -4/07 E13-011 Printed: 08-06-2013 FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project File No: PL13-023 Tukwila Village I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION Redevelopment of an approximate 7 acre site into a mixed use neighborhood center designed to provide residences, retail stores, offices, and other community amenities. An associated project that will share access, parking and utilities is a new neighborhood library. The site will be developed in three phases. (See Phased Site Plan - Attachment A) II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Tukwila Village mixed use three-phase development Applicant: Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC Location: The site is located east of Tukwila International Boulevard on the north and south sides of S 144th Street. The project site encompasses 21 tax parcels (See the Aerial Site Map - Attachment B) Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC) and High Density Residential (HDR) with two overlays — Commercial Redevelopment Area and Urban Renewal Overlay The following information was considered as part of review of this application. 1. SEPA Checklist (Park, May 28,2013) 2. Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist (May 28, 2013) 3. Updated Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. March 18, 2013) 4. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Associated Earth Sciences, Inch November 30 2011) 5. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. November 22 2011) 6. Tukwila Village Development Proposal Project Description May 28, 2013 7. Concurrency Test Notice Surface Water 8. Certificate of Sewer Availability Valley View Sewer District 9. Certificate of Water Availability King County Water District #125 Page 1 of 15 10. Tukwila Village Phase 1 Response to Design Review Criteria 11. Traffic Impact Analysis (Parametrix, May 28, 2013) 12. Arborist Report (Tina Cohen, Northwest Arborvitae, September 16, 2011) 13. Technical information Report (Barghausen, May 22, 2013) 14. Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) (approved by the City Council in October 2012 and Contract number 12-129) between Tukwila Village Associates and the City of Tukwila 15. Development Agreement (approved by Tukwila Ordinance 2391 and Contract number 12- 176) between Tukwila Village Associates and the City of Tukwila NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Moira Carr Bradshaw, Senior Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, Phone: 206-431-3670. III. REVIEW PROCESS The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does not meet the exemptions listed under WAC 197-11-800. IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The project site consists of 21 parcels plus the 41 Avenue S. street right of way that is proposed for vacation. Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC, has obtained the exclusive right to acquire the project site from the City of Tukwila, the owner of the site, and to develop the project. The site is generally located on the east side of Tukwila International Boulevard and on the north and south sides of the intersection with S. 144 Street. The project known as Tukwila Village consists of 4 multistory mixed use housing and commercial buildings with a public use component in a separate one story building and adjacent public open space. The project also includes the construction of a new one story 10,000 square foot King County neighborhood library to replace the existing Foster Library, which is within the same block to the east of the site. Attachment C is a detailed Project Description. V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following is a list of elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in this staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. Page 2of15 A. BACKGROUND: 1.-7. Concur with checklist. 8. City approval of Statements of Purpose and Design for the Plaza and Commons. 9. -12. Concur with checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a. — h. Concur with checklist. 2. Air: a. Applicant is required to obtain all relevant permits from Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to address any emission to the air. b. — c. Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a. (1)-(2) A Category IV wetland is located within this block on the south side of S. 144 Street and work will occur within 200 feet. The wetland's buffer is effectively stopped by S. 144 Street and no work is being shown to occur within it or the wetland. The storm water from this site and the sensitive area flow to Gilliam Creek. Exhibits F and I of the TIR (Barghausen, 2013) incorrectly state that there are no wetlands in the vicinity. (3-6) Concur with checklist. b. (1) and (2) Concur with checklist. c. (1) The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. c. (2) Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. d. The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. Page 3 of 15 4. Plants: a. Concur with checklist. b. In addition to what the applicant has indicated in the checklist, the Arborist report identified 59 trees on the project site. 23 trees were identified as healthy, meaning that the tree has a normal vigorous appearance for the species and are the most viable candidates for retention. Of those trees, eight were identified as Superior trees and worthy of retention. The species that are viable for retention include Coast Redwoods, Douglas Fir, Bigleaf Maple, Incense Cedar and Western Red Cedar. An evaluation is needed to determine if the canopy and roots can withstand the construction that will occur adjacent to them. c. - d. Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a. — b. Concur with checklist. c. This area is part of the Pacific Flyway, which is a primary corridor for migratory bird species. d. Concur with checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. — c. Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a. (1) - (2) Concur with checklist. b. (1) Concur with checklist. b. (2)- (3) The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements. Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts, associated with the project. The hours during which construction noise is exempt is from 7 am —10 pm Monday —Friday and 8 am - 10 pm on weekends and holidays. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. — k. Concur with checklist. 1. The site is owned by the City of Tukwila and compatibility and compliance with plans has been discussed and reviewed during the review of the Disposition and Development Agreement and the Development Agreement. In addition, there have been multiple opportunities for community involvement and City Council review of plans and programming for the project and site. See the City's web site for a list of meetings and presentations: http://www.tukwilawa.gov/tukwilavillage.html The Statement of Purpose and Design for the Commons building and Plaza are also proposed to ensure compatibility. After applications were submitted, an Information Night was also held to obtain public review and comments. Page 4 of 15 9. Housing: a. — c. Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a. - b. Concur with checklist. c. The project is subject to design review by the Board of Architectural Review and any aesthetic impacts will be mitigated as part of that review process. The community adopted specific design guidelines for the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor to address the goals for a more pedestrian oriented neighborhood center. The applicant's Project Description also notes that there will be a south facing public outdoor landscaped terrace on Level 5, which will provide an opportunity to enjoy views of the Cascade Mountain range and Mt. Rainier. 11. Light and Glare: a. – d. Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a. The project site is one block east of Cascade View Neighborhood Park and the Tukwila Swimming Pool is located approximately one block east of the subject site. b. Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. – c. Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: a. – b. Concur with checklist. c. There are two discretionary applications that affect the parking supply for the site. The City must make an administrative decision on the number of required stalls for the new public library. The Tukwila Village project proposes sharing of parking stalls with the library and has applied for a 10% reduction in parking supply and consideration of on -street parking to meet parking demand. d. The City's concurrency management system provides a regulatory mechanism for evaluating the proposed project to ensure that adequate concurrency of transportation facilities to be provided within a reasonable time of the development impact. The concurrency management system also provides a framework for determining facilities and services needs and provides a basis for meeting those needs through capital facilities planning. A concurrency test notice of passing will be issued for Tukwila Village but a separate one will be required for the new library. Both this project – Tukwila Village and the associated library project will be subject to the traffic mitigation fees that will go towards the street improvements projects Page 5of15 that are in the City of Tukwila's Transportation Improvement Program and are in the vicinity of the proposed project. e. Concur with checklist. f. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report (Parametrix May 2013) will be reviewed to ensure that it is consistent with the City's concurrency ordinance. The trip generation, distribution, level of service at the intersection and impact mitigation fees are regulated by the Tukwila Municipal Code Transportation Concurrency Standards and Impact Fee Chapter (TMC) 9.48. g. The existing public street proposed for vacation, 41 Avenue S, serves as access to a parking lot for the Normandy Court property. Sheet 4 of 7 of the BLA/Lot consolidation shows "future access point" to the Normandy Court Condominium property. Sheet P1.0 of the Board of Architectural Review submittal shows a driveway from the internal Tukwila Village driveway circulation system into the Normandy Court property. Section 2.6 of the Disposition and Development Agreement describes the Street Vacation of 41 Avenue S. and the obligation to provide for permanent legal access easements to serve the Normandy Court property. 15. Public Services: a. There will be active recreation needs for the new residents. b. The City's Park and Fire impact fees (TMC 16.28 and 16. 26) will apply to the project and fees will be collected to mitigate the demand for recreational facilities. 16. Utilities: a. - b. Concur with checklist. V. COMMENTS: Comments received from the public at an information open house expressed community support for the proposed project. Some comments raised aesthetic concerns that will be addressed during design review adhering to the criteria of the adopted Tukwila International Boulevard Design Manual. VII. CONCLUSION The responsible official may issue a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) based on conditions attached to the proposal by the responsible official or on changes to, or clarifications of, the proposal made by the applicant. Staff recommends that the following condition be applied. Prior to recording of an approved Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation application (City of Tukwila File # L13-021,) the applicant shall prepare and receive approval from the City for a Private Ingress/Egress easement. That easement shall provide reasonable accommodation through the subject project site for the property owner(s) of Normandy Court Page 6 of 15 Condominiums (tax parcel# 6111100000) and for the maintenance of said access. The easement shall be recorded prior to recording of the Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation and that recording number shall be shown on the approved recorded copy of the Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation. With the above clarification and condition, the proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to the Threshold Determinations — Mitigated DNS section of Tukwila's Environmental Regulations Chapter (TMC21.04.150,) a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) can be issued for this project. This DNS recommendation is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above "Final Staff Evaluation for Application No. PL13-023 (E013-011,) and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed. This DNS is issued for a project that includes 3,930 cubic yards of cut and 31,210 cubic yards of fill, which exceeds the clearing and grading exemptions levels and therefore notice is required. The following public notice shall be given for this action per the Public Notice — Procedures section of the Environmental Regulations Chapter (TMC 21.04.210) Mitigation measures incorporated in the mitigated DNS shall deemed conditions of approval of the licensing decision and may be enforced in the same manner as any term or condition of the permit or enforced in any manner specifically prescribed by the City. Failure to comply with the designated mitigation measures shall be grounds for suspension and/or revocation of any license issued. Per the Threshold determinations - Mitigated DNS (TMC 21.04.150) the City shall not act upon a proposal for which a mitigated DNS has been issued for 15 days after the date of issuance. Page 7of15 Attachment C Tukwila Village Development Proposal Project Description The Applicant is Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC, a Washington limited liability company. The proposed Tukwila Village Development (the "Project") is mixed-use, multi -phase development of a site owned by the City of Tukwila located at the northeast and the southeast corners of the intersection of Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 144th Street (the "Project Site"). The Applicant has obtained the exclusive right to acquire the Project Site and to develop the Project pursuant to the Disposition and Development Agreement dated as of October 30, 2012 entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, and approved by motion of the Tukwila City Council at a Special Meeting on October 22, 2012 (the "Disposition and Development Agreement"). The Project Site consists of approximately 187,000 square feet of land immediately north of S. 144th Street and east of Tukwila International Boulevard (including approximately 23,000 square feet of 41st Avenue right of way to be vacated by the City of Tukwila) plus approximately 90,000 square feet of land immediately south of S. 144th Street and east of Tukwila International Boulevard, for a total of approximately 277,000 square feet or 6.4 acres of land. The Project Site consists of 21 parcels or tax lots which are proposed for consolidation into five development parcels pursuant to a Boundary Line Adjustment ("BLA") application. The proposed Development Parcels, Phasing and Buildings are illustrated on Attachment A. The proposed Project is being developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Disposition and Development Agreement, Recording No.20130212001612, as noted above, and the Development Agreement, Recording No. 20130212001613, dated as of December 21, 2012 entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, as approved by the Tukwila City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 2391 adopted on December 10, 2012. The Project Description corresponds to three development phases occurring on each of the corresponding Development Parcels in accordance with a Phased Development Plan. In addition to the three phases, the development of a public outdoor landscaped "open space" Plaza (the "Community Plaza") and a public indoor Commons or "community" building coupled with a private Cafe / Coffee Shop (collectively, the "Community Commons Building"), will occur on a separate Development Parcel known as the "Plaza Parcel," or Parcel C on the BLA application. Page 10 of 15 Phase 1— Proposed Parcel A Phase 1 of the Project will be developed with a single mixed-use structure labeled "Building A." The Plaza Parcel is also included in and labeled "Phase 1" for the reasons described above, but the description of the Plaza Parcel development is provided separately below. The site area of the Phase 1 Development Parcel (excluding the Plaza Parcel — Parcel C) is approximately 63,989 square feet or 1.47 acres. The gross building area of Building A is approximately 119,493 square feet, including approximately 78,944 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 8,165 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space, approximately 23,380 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 9,004 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Building A includes: • two levels of structured parking containing 85 garage parking stalls for residential use only (Level P1 below grade and Level 1 at grade), • approximately 8,165 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space, approximately 1,271 square feet of lobby, management office and amenity space, and four (4) live -work studio loft dwelling units (Level 1 at grade), • five levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 6) containing a mix of studio, one - bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, private and semi -private outdoor landscaped terraces (Level 2), a south facing public outdoor landscaped terrace (Level 5), private exterior decks on selected residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 6), and • approximately 43 surface parking stalls for residential and commercial/retail use, and various other landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower two (2) levels (Level P1 and Level 1) consist of Type IA (post -tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper five (5) levels (Levels 2 - 6) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. There will be a total of 84 dwelling units including: • 4 live -work studio loft dwelling units with rentable floor area of approximately 665 square feet, • 10 studio apartment units average rentable floor area of approximately 463 square feet, • 39 one -bedroom apartment units with an average rentable floor area of approximately 650 square feet, with a range from approximately 618 square feet to approximately to 677 square feet, and • 31 two-bedroom apartment units with an average rentable floor area of approximately 951 square feet, with a range from approximately 878 square feet to approximately 985 square feet. Page 11 of 15 Plaza Parcel — Parcel C The outdoor community plaza and the indoor community building will be developed and constructed on the Plaza Parcel, the other parcel labeled "Phase 1" on the Phased Development Plan. The site area of the Plaza Parcel is approximately 31,863 square feet or 0.73 acres. The community plaza will consist of a wide variety of landscaped and hardscaped areas designed in accordance with the "Statement of Purpose and Design" for the Outdoor Plaza as contemplated in the Disposition and Development Agreement. Building C is the indoor community building to be developed and constructed on the Plaza Parcel and will consist of one (1) single level, mixed use structure that includes: (i) a large flex space designed in accordance with the "Statement of Purpose and Design" for the Indoor Commons as contemplated in the Disposition and Development Agreement containing approximately 1,711 gross square feet of assembly space, (ii) a catering kitchen containing approximately 368 gross square feet of space, (iii) approximately 200 gross square feet of storage space, (iv) approximately 215 gross square feet of reception space, (v) approximately 360 gross square feet of men's & women's public restroom space, (vi) approximately 88 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms), and (vii) a Cafe / Coffee Shop containing approximately 1,268 gross square feet of retail space, including seating area, kitchen area, refrigeration area and office area; (viii) a covered entry of approximately 400 square feet, and (ix) an indoor/outdoor fireplace and outdoor seating area. The gross building area of Building C is approximately 4,210 square feet. The Indoor Commons and the Cafe / Coffee Shop will share the reception space, the public restroom space, building services areas, the covered entry area, the indoor/outdoor fireplace and the outdoor seating area. The Plaza Parcel also contains approximately 20 surface parking stalls dedicated for use by visitors and retail customers of the Indoor Commons and the Cafe / Coffee Shop. Phase 2 — Proposed Parcel E Phase 2 of the Project will be developed and constructed on the Development Parcel labeled "Phase 2" - Parcel E - with a two (2) mixed-use structures labeled "Building D" and "Building E." The site area of the Phase 2 Development Parcel is approximately 84,310 square feet or 1.94 acres. The gross building area of Building D is approximately 97,130 square feet, including approximately Page 12 of 15 64,330 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 13,000 gross rentable square feet of commercial office space, approximately 17,630 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 1,520 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Building D includes: • One level of below grade structured parking (Level P1) containing 49 garage parking stalls (including 43 stalls for residential use and 6 for commercial office use) approximately 2,090 square of rentable storage and residential amenity space; • One level of approximately 13,000 gross rentable square feet of commercial office space (Level 1 and Level 1 Mezzanine ;) • Five levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 6) containing a mix of one -bedroom and two-bedroom apartments; and • approximately 22 surface parking stalls for commercial office use and landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower two (2) levels (Level P1 and Level 1) consist of Type IA (post -tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper five (5) levels (Levels 2 - 6) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. There are a total of 70 dwelling units in Building D including • 35 one -bedroom apartment units, with an average rentable floor area of approximately 587 square feet, with a range from approximately 475 square feet to approximately 658 square feet; and • 35 two-bedroom apartment units with an average rentable floor area of approximately 758 square feet, with a range from approximately 715 square feet to approximately 825 square feet. The gross building area of Building E is approximately 134,960 square feet, including approximately 101,670 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 3,150 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail and police resource center space, approximately 25,968 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 4,172 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Building E includes: • one level of structured parking containing 70 garage parking stalls for residential use only (Level 1 at grade), approximately 1,150 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space, approximately 2,000 gross rentable square feet of police resource center space, and approximately 1,200 square feet of lobby and management office space (Level 1 at grade); Page 13 of 15 • four levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 5) containing a mix of one -bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, semi -private outdoor landscaped courtyard (Level 1 at grade), private exterior decks on selected residential dwelling units (Levels 3 - 4); • approximately 7 surface parking stalls for commercial/retail use, and various other landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower level (Level 1) consists of Type IA (post -tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper four (4) levels (Levels 2 - 5) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. There are a total of 124 dwelling units in Building E, including: • 70 one -bedroom apartment units with an average rentable floor area of approximately 556 square feet, with a range from approximately 475 square feet to approximately 720 square feet; and • 54 two-bedroom apartment units with an average rentable floor area of approximately 732 square feet, with a range from approximately 751 square feet to approximately 819 square feet. Phase 3 — Proposed Parcel B Phase 3 of the Project will be developed and constructed on the Development Parcel labeled "Phase 3" on the Phased Development Plan with a single mixed-use structure labeled "Building B." The site area of the Phase 3 Development Parcel is approximately 66,178 square feet or 1.52 acres. The gross building area of Building B is approximately 132,085 square feet, including approximately 102,375 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 1,800 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space, approximately 25,600 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 2,310 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Building B includes: • one level of structured parking containing 70 garage parking stalls for residential use only (Level 1 at grade), approximately 1,800 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space and approximately 4,450 square feet of residential amenity space (Level 1 at grade), • four levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 5) containing a mix of one -bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, private and semi -private outdoor landscaped terraces and courtyard (Level 2), private exterior decks on selected residential dwelling units (Levels 3 - 4), • approximately 16 surface parking stalls for commercial/retail and flex use, and various other landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower level (Level 1) consists of Type IA (post -tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper four (4) levels (Levels 2 - 5) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. Page 14 of 15 There are a total of 125 dwelling units in Building B, including: • 77 one -bedroom apartment units average rentable floor area of approximately 566 square feet, with a range from approximately 475 square feet to approximately 720 square feet and • 48 two-bedroom apartment units average rentable floor area of approximately 730 square feet, with a range from approximately 715 square feet to approximately 751 square feet. Library — Proposed Parcel D The Library Branch to be developed and constructed by the King County Library System is the subject of a separate Design Review application and is included in the Proposed Site Plan and the SEPA checklist but not in the accompanying Design Review submittal for Phase 1 of the Project. The Library Branch will contain approximately 10,000 gross square feet of space and feature a "green roof' with an area of approximately 8,395 square feet. The total impervious surface area contained on the Library Parcel is 12,220 square feet. Parking The completed Project will provide a total of approximately 463 parking stalls, including: (i) 127 on-site surface parking stalls, (ii) 300 on-site structured parking garage stalls, (iii) 18 on-site surface parking stalls dedicated to the adjacent Riverton Terrace public housing project pursuant to a parking easement, and (iv) 18 new on -street parking stalls. Parking is proposed to be provided in the following numbers and phases: W:\Long Range Projects\Tukwila Village\PL13-023\SEPA staff report -Tukwila Village PL13-023.doc Page 15 of 15 Residential Garage Commercial Garage Surface On -Street Total Phase 1 85 53 18 156 Phase 2 43+80 6 29 158 Phase 3 86 33 119 294 6 115 18 433 W:\Long Range Projects\Tukwila Village\PL13-023\SEPA staff report -Tukwila Village PL13-023.doc Page 15 of 15 Arborist Report: Tukwila Village Prepared for Mel Easter, ASLA The LA Studio 15200 5211a Ave S, Suite 210 Seattle, WA 98188 Site visit : September 13, 2011 Prepared by Tina Cohen, I.S.A. Certified Arborist #PN0245A Northwest Arborvitae Report date: September 16, 2011 Page 1 of 8 MEMBER Mo Cop j RECEIVED JUN 12 2013 • COMMUNI I Y DEVELOPMENT Page 2 of 8 Table of Contents Introduction and Scope of Work page 3 Summary of Tree Health page 3 Explanation of Spreadsheet terms page 4 Spreadsheet separate attachment Recommendations by Area page 5 Conclusion page 5 Limits to the Report page 5 Photos page 6-7 Site plan via postal mail Tina Cohen, Certified Arborist Northwest Arborvitae 8318 26th Ave NW Seattle, WA 98117 phone 206-789-3283 fax 206-789-0262 email tina@tinacohen.com September 16, 2011 Mel Easter, ASLA The LA Studio 15200 52nd Ave S, Suite 210 Seattle, WA 98188 Arborist Services Re: Tukwila Village, International Blvd & S. 144th Street, Tukwila, WA Site visit: 9/13/11 Dear Mr. Easter: On September 13, 2011 we met on site along with Jessica Marquardt from your office. I received the site survey, and evaluated the on-site trees. The purpose was to determine which trees are the healthiest and best candidates for retention. Scope of Work I determined the health, structure, life span, overall quality, positive or negative impacts on long — term survival, and positive or negative impacts to the development. The information is intended to guide the design as decisions are made about preserving or removing trees. I understand that the City of Tukwila does not have any tree preservation requirements, only guidelines. Summary of Tree Health The majority of the site trees are drought stressed, excessively pruned, and/or unaesthetic. I noted only 5 superior trees worth special retention consideration out of 59 trees evaluated. This project is an excellent opportunity to replace declining trees with vigorous, appropriate species. • North trees, north of the matchline, #1-18, 45-47: These are all unaesthetic and in marginal health. The exception is fir #18, which somehow escaped damage during the construction of the adjacent apartment building to the east. • East trees, #19-24: These are benefiting from the irrigation from the adjacent library's lawn and are the most vigorous on the site. See the photo on page 5. Page 3 of 8 • North of S. 144th St.: The trees are dying or very stressed from wounds, excess pruning, and drought. See the photo on page 6. The exception is Coast redwood #32; even with graffiti on the trunk it stands out as a superior tree. It can grow to 200 feet and live 300 years. This species is tolerant of disturbance. • Trees along S. 144th St.: Most were excessively pruned. The Lombardy poplars, although mostly healthy, are short lived (about 75-100 years) and are not the best candidates for retention for this reason. The London planes vary in condition, but they are long-lived (200+ years) and very tolerant of root and canopy damage. • South of S. 144th St.: The cedars adjacent to the barbershop have been excessively limbed up. The trunks are growing into the concrete bulkhead. They will tolerate these conditions, although the cut stumps of four adjacent cedars indicate the owner does not. Coast redwood #35 at the far southwest corner of the site is healthy. • West ROW along International Blvd: The hybrid Norway maples in the sidewalk vaults are healthy although drought stressed. Eventually they'll fill out to help soften the visual impact from the busy arterial. Two Red oaks are dying from drought, as noted on the site plan. • West on site: The Incense cedars are healthy with only two appearing stressed. They're a good choice for this location because they rarely damage sidewalks. They are small enough to transplant assuming they'll get water while being held for replanting. Details of Findings — Explanation of spreadsheet terms. Please see the following fields on the enclosed Excel spreadsheet. Tree #: Each tree is numbered corresponding to the site plan. Species: Common names are listed. Trunk diameter: I measured the trunk diameter inches at 4.5 feet from the ground if the survey didn't provide it. Health rating: Healthy = normal vigor and appearance for the species (these wiil be the best candidates for retention); Healthy fair = viable but not necessarily the best tree for retention; Poor = not healthy, in decline; Dying = will not survive another year. Structure: Characterizes the general shape of the tree. Codominant' refers to having two or more trunks or tops that are parallel, versus a single trunk. Many species do this naturally. Comment: The comment provides an opinion regarding esthetics and in the case of the incense cedars, transplant information. Canopy radius: I measured the extent of the canopy (its radius) from the trunk to the outer edge. This is a rule of thumb for distance to place protection fencing and stay away from a tree during construction. Current status: Viable refers to being alive now and remaining so into the future, assuming it would be protected during the project. Non-viable means the tree will not survive long term, whether or not it's protected. Page 4 of 8 Retention info: This will help you decide/justify if a particular tree should be saved or not. If a tree is noted as Superior, it should be saved if possible. Tolerant species will accept root loss; sensitive species are likely to decline. Recommendations by Area East: The best trees on the site are near the east property line, adjacent to the irrigated King County Library lawn. I recommend saving maple #20 and cedar #21, and protect them as a group at their dripline radii. Fir #18 is also worth saving if the design will allow it. West: The incense cedars are small enough and worthy to transplant except for multi - trunked specimens, or trees that are stressed. The ROW hybrid Norway maples should be retained and protected during the project. Replace the two ROW Red oaks with maples because of their condition. Central/southwest: The two Coast redwoods #32 and #35 are worth saving if they will have enough space to grow. These are very young trees. Along 144"' Street: The poplars are short-lived and not worth special design changes to accommodate them. If you decide to retain the most east poplars #23 and #24, they should be further inspected when the ivy is cleared. The London planes #36-39 will tolerate nearly any amount of disturbance and can be retained except for #38, which leans towards the street. They're young but already provide shade along the street. Consider if they have enough root space during the design process because they're well known for buckling sidewalks. Conclusion There really aren't very many trees worth saving on this site. They've suffered from excessive pruning, trunk wounds, and drought. The superior trees clustered near the east property line should be considered for retention. The small incense cedars near the west property line are tolerating the dry conditions and should be used elsewhere on the project. If there will be space for the Coast redwoods, they would create quite a statement in the new landscape. Limits Unless expressed otherwise (1) information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items atthe time of inspection, and (2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without further dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. Loss or alteration of any part of a report invalidates the entire report. Notwithstanding the recommendations and conclusions made in this report, it must be realized that trees are living organisms and their health and vigor constantly change over time. They are not immune to changes in site conditions or seasonal variations in the weather. Page 5 of 8 There is no warranty or guarantee expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the trees in question may not arise in the future. The report and conclusions expressed herein represent the opinion of Tina Cohen d/b/a Northwest Arborvitae. Our fee is no way contingent upon any specified value, a result or occurrence of a subsequent event, or upon any finding to be reported. Respectfully submitted, • 1444.11., Tina Cohen, ISA Certified Arborist #PN0245A American Society of Consulting Arborists, Registered Consulting Arborist #473 PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor #194 tina@tinacohen.com Enclosures Excel spreadsheet `Tukwila Village Tree Data' Site plan via postal mail Page 6 of 8 MEMBER PHOTOS Trees near the east property line fence, north of S. piet, are the healthiest because they receive irrigation from the adjacent library property. From the left the on site trees are #19 Lawson cypress, 420 Bigleaf maple, and #21 Western red cedar. Page 7 of 8 The left tree is Doug fir #41. It's dying because of damage from the asphalt poured over the roots. The right tree is Western red cedar #42 which has been excessively pruned. Many of the on site trees suffered extreme Iimbing and are unaesthetic. The tree in the distance, to the left of the salmon -colored building, is Coast redwood #35. It's in good health and should be retained assuming there's enough space for its roots and canopy. Page 8 of 8 MEMBE3t Site visit 9/13/11 Tukwila Village Tree Data 1 by Tina Cohen, Certified Arborist ir, t� .. i3.F l y .,a .. pp ��y33tt .S ti u3 -.:.;-.�, .+.Y ,. N', ..., .. n•L* . ,.. ; , ., h �. ' i !. 1 J � 'k t ppn: ,! rA:gt' !.�� ..: -t4 f .:�..'���!'�N';l��a',r,.R1�a+7'$sr5. :,6 s ..'.^x--: .: ,0 . Y 4 7DIY ' .. • <n -.n. y <'( r . � ,,''�"" K{[[i. �'b'kib,�t ....s .. ;. #-er,• ,. i kit 1 }! Q , . ,N iiZ .,R. Y P��E t t...., . a, v.i7�. .� d','t: ok: ��"' �• U t4/.JEr• ...t4 x, ,?(v/.', ; tS` d �}� ,p� Y,►� '��,`._;}Y����:�r� healthy ;ek Y1^•W, � p..�•:�" '' 1r 4 " r au3 ,t oo;F r :LSZ! fr�y, Xtt t i I!��yy , V. 4V ,Sr; .(•.. 7 1'•t.. , .M1, a tL�r.y'ts•,:ra�.�r. . ,...,i , 4u', A yt, �`! '� tt 4 �'� 'R�tth...htr�+;i, Excess limbing % ,r I , '*'t.. 7.i.",': 'yp!3, ?fill 7x Y 'roV M;r! i. t :. , )v iS t 'b,� S :z,'N Wt'1' .�7 . 's. 1, n, : F: ..� i!• �?{elm.. ., ;.�l i i�., . ., ` t t, r, '� y�'�h4�Ny4 ���el���th..'.��`;n., ifs ,. .m1II''. Y:.: :.xS ,�� V t.ai s..fiC �!}: EF i A . .t�tiiv�.,. i. .d>!��� §,A< 'gar if 'ivyr`•"f ' W, .� n ( & ,rr}} .MY f� l47 • i7, SI, 4� k? - SIH 1� .11� ,.1..,a. t e. t fl if, % '. „ �,y ! ,F , Nfi..]��� i Viable ,. e"{ Sf+, 7: ux.P .: "F. 27, .'j .t ! e �: 1 i ,,i t' k t , y, tolerant�� species "�,�..: olera 1 Pear 5 2 Pear 4 healthy fair codominant trunks 9 Viable tolerant species 3 Pear 10 healthy Excess limbing 9 Viable tolerant species 4 Apple 5 healthy fair Excess limbing not esthetic 9 Viable tolerant species 5 cedar, w red 4 dying Knocked over 5 Non-viable remove unhealthy 6 Hornbeam 5 healthy fair codominant trunks poor esthetics, ugly 9 Viable tolerant species 7 cedar, w red 12 dying Excess limbing dead top, drought ALL 12 Non-viable remove unhealthy 8 cedar, w red_ 14 dying Excess limbing 13 Non-viable remove unhealthy 9 cedar, w red 23 healthy fair Excess limbing 14 Viable sensitive species 10 cedar, w red 12 healthy fair Excess limbing 12 Viable sensitive species 11 cedar, w red 12 healthy fair Excess limbing trunk wounded 15 Non-viable remove unhealthy 12 cedar, w red 14 healthy Excess limbing must save group or none 14 - Viable sensitive species 13 cedar, w red 12 poor Excess limbing dead top 13 Non-viable remove unhealthy 14 cedar, w red 14,8 poor codominant trunks drought 12 Non-viable remove unhealthy 15 cedar, w red 8 poor Excess limbing wounded • 6 Non-viable remove unhealthy 16 Doug fir 12 healthy fair Excess limbing impacted by building; poor color 14 Viable tolerant species 17 Doug fir 14 poor broken top 16,17 stressed 14 Viable remove unhealthy 18 Doug fir 15 healthy OK best of group 16 Viable SUPERIOR tree 19 Lawson cypress 21 healthy fair codominant trunks basal wound 9 Non-viable sensitive species 20 maple bigleaf 29 healthy codominant trunks 19 Viable SUPERIOR tree 21 cedar, w red 43 healthy codominant trunks 18 Viable SUPERIOR tree 22 Portuguese laurel 12 healthy codominant trunks ugly 10 Viable tolerant species 23 Lombardy poplar 45 . healthy OK ivy prevented full inspection 18 Viable Short lived species 24 Lombardy poplar 48 healthy OK 15 Viable Short lived species 25 Lombardy poplar 36 healthy fair Excess limbing if saving recheck after clearing ivy 10 Viable Short lived species 26 Lombardy poplar 36 healthy fair Excess limbing 15 Viable Short lived species 27 Lombardy poplar 36 healthy fair Excess limbing 10 Viable Short lived species 28 Lombardy poplar 36,24 healthy fair codominant trunks 15 Viable Short lived species See report for further explanation and summary of findings. Site visit 9/13/11 Tukwila Village Tree Data 2 by Tina Cohen, Certified Arborist .S i .Y:?'ltiii ii kq$ty�Ly.�+. ^ : r .f�F' '1311 � . r±.�n ((jj :lt ed3 ' 44q! ' dH rY.. ,...��.. • f; �.. �6. yJ:q' 1'y :. .l K ab(/ �. ..,...:.,.,i ,1iik q ,a�,.e... .. .,. :. . � . .ZR'1 .1, .., ;txt.. . ..11a - #' . ./t•',,- In �:wrd.: i�.. �, AR..,, cr7t 5il.�.�- .,.. ,. Yv.<....� 1 rVll 1 ..,a Y�'` 4�`.> ' h`, .W 's.. .�, ....kY'Y` 3i.,. . , -h e .?. :F"tk. I ,. , ri�`t 1Y::� M1((. ,.t QQ�� �3, fr i� .. Y. .} jh ..7 .!,( r ..'1 ,i`; .: .. ... . .. :. .. .::.t .. f w v. a! . wt;,It .r .,>. .. . 41aY , : ? N . � � i.;� ..#'+ , �.IA 3 6 A ,It v yy7. , l4'., .' � .ifai1 ,i.. CSy ,{ q,he..y % '-. ! a ,, YY t }-_.. ' .. i.: •t "vr: } �. .. ...'4 , .r, 's B Ef..�tj f, 4.{ £.,- . .8:: :r., uw f. 3 r, 34, ftty}T�E.+'.3 , �' v,. ,` Sr c� I'£J„ 11 .��,.. ii 4 ,Yry, .ay A `.4 } �f 'hZ. A ;. 1t1: �?'Yea 7•r'1gk y`tF ia.\J,rr., ib .... .a.;.yk:4' .. �.': e: ':•: :, l�l` �. . t♦ � k a4k 3y,�`."t,�•y, x } _;:t r'-1`�x,[e, .. .. ..l....'i`f' 4': y .. ,. ,x�1£,, /r S, t,� � .t� � ��.�, "�.re n$+ .l . F � ..a � £� ''Y � axY. rrl.F:+ y lmn ai r.i IL, Fr4L.:. .. > ; ��t, .•iR�'. n .; i. '••yo `S SAI a£45 .?_ �. . S.�t, •.((; � 4A. . Y,., �.3t r k Mi � £ � ..S i., y� qp��a +T �v+..^`��'? �. f ,. -. .. .. 1,,6:4 :F, YIt . 3}i, 29 Lawson cypress 8 dying OK suppressed 6 Non-viable remove unhealthy 30 Lombardy poplar 32 healthy fair Excess limbing basal wounds 15 Non-viable remove unhealthy 31 Copper beech 8 healthy Excess limbing trunk wounds 10 Viable tolerant species 32 Coast redwood 40 healthy OK trunk wound 21 Viable SUPERIOR tree 33 cedar, w red 18 healthy fair codominant trunks 33,34 limbed, impacted by wall, ugly 16 Viable sensitive species 34 cedar, w red 36 healthy fair codominant trunks 18 Viable sensitive species 35 Coast redwood 32 healthy Excess limbing adja bldg, carp ants 16 Viable SUPERIOR tree 36 Londonplane 16 healthy OK 15 Viable tolerant species 37 London plane 17 healthy Excess limbing 15 Viable tolerant species 38 London plane 16 healthy fair Excess limbing leans south 15 Non-viable tolerant species 39 London plane 31 healthy fair Trunk tore away, 18 Viable tolerant species 40 maple bigleaf 32 poor codominant trunks canopy dieback 18 Non-viable remove unhealthy 41 Doug fir 32 dyinQ topped in paviig 18 Non-viable remove unhealthy 42 cedar, w red 18.18.18 healthy fair codominant trunks ugly. trunk wounded 15 Viable sensitive species 43 Colo spruce 32 healthy fair Excess limbing trunk wounded 15 Viable sensitive species 44 Sweetgum 30 poor Trunk tore away 18 Non-viable remove unhealthy 45 Mt ash 6 poor codominant trunks stump sprout 12 Non-viable remove unhealthy 46 Mt ash 22 poor codominant trunks extensive wounds, poor canopy 18 Non-viable remove unhealthy 47 E dogwood 6 dying OK drought, anthracnose 5 Non-viable remove unhealthy 48 incense cedar 8 healthy OK transplant 4 Viable SUPERIOR tree 49 incense cedar 5 healthy codominant top looks broken, NOT suitable to transplant 6 Viable tolerant species 50 incense cedar 3 healthy multiple trunks NOT suitable to transplant 3 Viable tolerant species 51 incense cedar 3 healthy OK transplant 3 Viable tolerant species 52 incense cedar 6 healthy multiple trunks NOT suitable to transplant 6 Viable tolerant species 53 incense cedar 4 healthy OK transplant 3 Viable SUPERIOR tree 54 incense cedar 6 healthy OK transplant 4 Viable SUPERIOR tree 55 incense cedar 6 healthy OK transplant 5.5 Viable tolerant species See report for further explanation and summary of findings. Site visit 9/13/11 Tukwila Village Tree Data 3 by Tina Cohen, Certified Arborist Pt i,'p v:Y' a6 , k,`x� ht;;�/., , y yy� �� ft.,41F•E; ,, >• f Fes, :. k .. .. �� .. ..i:.. , .l , t, r. - l , . R . t. J;S . '��' ytt.. 7 �� 4�.� - - 'S a ?om .. .�t ... . ' � f d� J , sn..,. . � .. 1'tl5 t µt.9t1,y �}Ly "5.. I s s., ; 41' Ci"ct G r'R . ?! ..41 1 S +7 'l ty3 s66�. , tTs 't!= y.,: 7='4`6 . t' r fl r••y7 •'.. r*ii-! • 4"f •.. 1 ..xt4�'L \. „. Et�]�\; ' 4}+ #t�,, �Y.. (. �� 4ySY �� tPr 'kr a 4 di„ art �r1 'ry . 'T "�.. ' `� . I. ''\ . i`�4Y �= s ,,,kr'1 � ..tf { R,, xt/Vi. 44:1�1�F'4G'L�+. �5t�'. s i ]'S , . yy....�..� . .. $.ri ,j,/. ..�`w vfi •a �r<i. Tt, .47,ye,, � .� t3' �.>� .•tl: l.�4 Y jl'?f, + i,x;i Vi. , ilY4t ,, ,,?7: � � fi�l 4� . ,. ,.�{ (. .. .. U Sr, >4,... 5 i ,.;`ylni2',�„ . "Ta;' ;,ts !. .. i 4'f Jfte�. ,, nY� s o 'r?{,4',?; i. p r ,�,i .2,��• ,� � 'ijll�� liSi�h ' >� ., ..'� ..�', ti 56 incense cedar 3 poor OK stunted, NOT suitable to transplant 2 Non-viable remove unhealthy 57 incense cedar 5 healthy OK transplant 4 Viable tolerant species 58 incense cedar 4 healthy fair codominant tops NOT suitable to transplant 2 Viable tolerant species 59 incense cedar 4 healthy fair OK thin canopy, NOT suitable to transplant 3 Viable tolerant species See report for further explanation and summary of findings. • lArl T.FWel XWWTS A. 5 A4 4,K,.,, NTaw INC Pn„T.. WATA 1.10,ro PRELIMINARY ALTA / ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY .. LIGHT POLE w/J130X TEL 41628 S. 142ND ST. POWER W4AT O GATE •C821 11601 POLE W/JBOX 02 POWER POE SC11�, RAWCMR PRE NiwNHT w/YALVE SEL a TREE (TW) TREE *1611 (iSP) TREE WELL (TVP) .! 0 15 20 60 SCALE: 1'•30' `1G'WPOLE /JBER TREE WELL 1WW �' ik i l II« l 444°:T • 1 11011 POLE w/JBO1 UGIT POLE W/4800 FRE 1TfOLLO1T 14/VALVE WATER POWER 1ANNOLE.! ECO BLDCK (0YP) CEDAR 4`. aCBiO CEDAR 4' 6-8'" 5' NANHOLE POWER •VAULT JBOX FRE \! 57 410 -PARKING SCR. TER VALVE(2) UGH( POLE W/4800 TREE WELL (IsP) SOPA POLE 4500 USW POLE w/JBOX .! SOY2724Y . 16731' POINO 1' RON PPE/ NO CAP .s ,s •"•'� �• FOUND 5/6' REBNI/CJP 1.423504 .V' .r ,! FOUND • 4 1449/50 41606E A -PARK . SCR Ao I n I S , SS(rdl si • w/LUN e ANCHOR 1118738'3116 105.11' r OI. OL6VERT ,!1'272 10.416260.05' 50 SS I/ TREE WELL (TTP) KEYSTONE 41411.- W/CEDAR 141w/CEDAR 1336' CBI 12' DI. CULVERT [.28533 8.67`49 W' 0023RD ! R�-00 t�):QY! (0 BLOCK CITI) KEYSTONE WALL . W/GEDA8 6' /A/c-.vti<ta. 4Y.S 6-5•-+ .! mate " $ •- ND -P160 , Et•\ sIc0 0 301'272(6 10110.11011410 ,_ W36'' WNi.. W/,011066 440 _ 1 .4' • .55735'492 105.11' POLE. VICINITY MAP N.T.8 SURVEY INFORMATION BASIS OF BEARING - NA083/01 PER CRY OF TUKWILA THE SASS OF BFA ACS FON 1115 SUF6'EY S NAB 63/91 PER COY Q 1164464J1 4111 OF TUKWAA HORIZONTAL CONTROL POST 140. 17 (S. 1/4 CORNER OF SEC. 15) wA5 RETD FOR POSITON AND A LINE BETWEEN SAID POINT N0. 17 AND CRY OF TUKWILA HORIZONTAL CONTROL PANT N0. 1925 WAS NEED FOR ROTATION BERG 10RO1 6T 35. 22. WEST. VERIIGIL DATUM - NAND 88 PER CITY OF TUKWILA 11E VER1CI1. DA1W FOR IIS PROJECT S MOW PER OTT OF RAMA CRY OF 11MWWWA CONTROL POAR NO. 17 (5. 1/4 CORNEA OF SEC. 15) WAS NE1D FOR ELEVATION. AWG 266.757. PROCEDURE / N RRATNE A RTO 1RAW6E USWG A 1496E 5600' R00311C TOTAL STATOR. 0436E % KWIC MIN STATION NO 10PCON GN CPS SUTPLOOD12 6111 NEW NOTES rib PERFOLOER ESIABL511N0 1116 ANCAIR. COR11, AND VERICN ROAT9191PS 9:MMER THE YWIWEN15. MmPFR16 1M5. AND 1OPoCRNii4 MARES AS SHWA 116401. 1114 8691.1 C MU NESS OR COEDS 1)E SWEARS FOR VM BOUTORE SWAYS AS SET FORTH M WK 322-130-060. 107115*PPU)BY TWA-Go%f /, C- RT/FIEAk'MBo.E:t4T \ \ \ ' FOUIO 1/Y R BIRMO CAP NO -PARI CR 16 513015 ' • - IETiS'311Y I IJ3x -1113- z:J POWER VAULT FIRE HYDRANT BOLLARD WAX )(P.M 1;' 17011'14' 104 10' FOUND 1/2' REEPR1345422 CAP D1AP (4EML0CY - Wa7 MJe.wp p FOUND 1/7 RON ND CAP .A. GAS VALVE LI°WPOLE /. TREE WELL (FIP) SHEET3 POWER CABINET 107 1. LIGHT POLE w/JB0X POWER WHOLE POWER WALT TEL J0000 / k_ EWs)601025111 P .41a9P 04 1 .t. SO1T7' ew ` -y WD.07 1 I L 1 3 ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY TUKWILA VILLAGE O LL 20 CEDAR 19' 10111 POLE-. s6T3s'sit Taal .1011 3Y s MAPLE 25' 12' CONC. MART 0.264.65' SHEET3 oft I0 • N 8 dd MI s N t G S 14010 ST 5 4417 5T 5 4 14200 ST u. %%LC SITE s 14410 51 /fire., 1 5 44 14600 ST SURVEY INFORMATION BASIS OF BEARING - NA083/01 PER CRY OF TUKWILA THE SASS OF BFA ACS FON 1115 SUF6'EY S NAB 63/91 PER COY Q 1164464J1 4111 OF TUKWAA HORIZONTAL CONTROL POST 140. 17 (S. 1/4 CORNER OF SEC. 15) wA5 RETD FOR POSITON AND A LINE BETWEEN SAID POINT N0. 17 AND CRY OF TUKWILA HORIZONTAL CONTROL PANT N0. 1925 WAS NEED FOR ROTATION BERG 10RO1 6T 35. 22. WEST. VERIIGIL DATUM - NAND 88 PER CITY OF TUKWILA 11E VER1CI1. DA1W FOR IIS PROJECT S MOW PER OTT OF RAMA CRY OF 11MWWWA CONTROL POAR NO. 17 (5. 1/4 CORNEA OF SEC. 15) WAS NE1D FOR ELEVATION. AWG 266.757. PROCEDURE / N RRATNE A RTO 1RAW6E USWG A 1496E 5600' R00311C TOTAL STATOR. 0436E % KWIC MIN STATION NO 10PCON GN CPS SUTPLOOD12 6111 NEW NOTES rib PERFOLOER ESIABL511N0 1116 ANCAIR. COR11, AND VERICN ROAT9191PS 9:MMER THE YWIWEN15. MmPFR16 1M5. AND 1OPoCRNii4 MARES AS SHWA 116401. 1114 8691.1 C MU NESS OR COEDS 1)E SWEARS FOR VM BOUTORE SWAYS AS SET FORTH M WK 322-130-060. 107115*PPU)BY TWA-Go%f /, C- RT/FIEAk'MBo.E:t4T \ \ \ ' FOUIO 1/Y R BIRMO CAP NO -PARI CR 16 513015 ' • - IETiS'311Y I IJ3x -1113- z:J POWER VAULT FIRE HYDRANT BOLLARD WAX )(P.M 1;' 17011'14' 104 10' FOUND 1/2' REEPR1345422 CAP D1AP (4EML0CY - Wa7 MJe.wp p FOUND 1/7 RON ND CAP .A. GAS VALVE LI°WPOLE /. TREE WELL (FIP) SHEET3 POWER CABINET 107 1. LIGHT POLE w/JB0X POWER WHOLE POWER WALT TEL J0000 / k_ EWs)601025111 P .41a9P 04 1 .t. SO1T7' ew ` -y WD.07 1 I L 1 3 ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY TUKWILA VILLAGE O LL 20 CEDAR 19' 10111 POLE-. s6T3s'sit Taal .1011 3Y s MAPLE 25' 12' CONC. MART 0.264.65' SHEET3 oft I0 • N 8 dd MI s N t G PRELIMINARY ALTA / ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY YY w [ 11.11' , �, �i . , . l ' � . 2's, .r l / •/ - -✓ •q 4..47m .V L ,4. ECO t1 ./ POWER . 1--..' �['OEWtgUS 6' ` jam_ I�!'_, �' / . 2'.;^W_ 4..... -y 3i,...:,<. J.I@�1. CEDAR•`' ;• ) r` \ / r 32 CEO19' / SHEET2 POWER �"� UPOLE W/JBOx POWER LIAVNOLF POWER VAULT TEL MO% LIGHT POLE w/JBOx 045 VALVE \y. . CULVERT POWER DETER it TEL CABINET ON ,POST 12 CONC. CUOMO E-264,05 SHEET2 SCALE: 1.330. TEL R/W PER 20060501000631 .VAULT, WATER METER POWER 600U10 8005 LOOM POLE w/JBOx SICN[L PEDESTAL CNCw H/C .I RAW VE-. -. q PI: 10.00.00 SS SS RAY PER 9510190955 ff MK 42' .,' .., 0/6 ..: ft ABS ..,.....€ 4A.D m POLE /r /Jeox rek� \ HMO .VAOU (EMPTY) ..7f94./ . /'.>• � H/C RAu�to cea �.�" ,017+'� 1 1>, [ /e /STOP/ n �� • • / 2 6791.01. %/ / / ,7••• , 2' WATER METER : , E%6oIHG j/ .,.. 1TPRI.7. :.470/9 t7.307.77'307.79' FOO c 41- .•, .! '23/ ` � :1 /a • ,�_.. 1, " RYz-•_ _p_ _•-�. ._.ita _;- -• . 1�, POWER TEE WA - pg .: - - t1-�. �..�. R6T$' 11,17.8.2.. IB • �. _ wANNOLC C. JBOx SS --19.8. ORMWA:-f. Jj• Ol09 15.31OLWEWAY, .30234-4 �j �' S5 7 l 19. ' DRM.WAY - - _ - _ _ _16.2' OF6vOyA 39L/w PER PLAT /E78'J1Y 16.25. R//Ww'' PFR PLAT PO135145' POPLAR 45"29• FOU30 1/T CABLE VAULT REBIR/GN TEL 0422341 0547.1 1"J724'N ace POwER STOP SIGN P0w6 JBO% 5r.NAl 809 POWER GROUND R00 116735310 24246' 101.10 USED 3/6• COPPER NAL /000501 DOAN 0,0' MELD FOR CENT00*E 41ST AVE 5 ASPHALT ECa F040 REBAR w/7633VM CAP 046454 LOD POLE W/JB0% LIGHT MOLE 3/JB09 w/VALVE UGH7 POLE 3/.309 TREE WELL WATER VAI[ WA METER ABOx CA3E RISER TEL VAULT POWER VAULT al aqua 231 0263.310 (4833443 al a 0043 sur 1( 45 3.239' fr. S.M. CO a,(9LN a1JI 3260.301 a..5,aIr 2 31.3151' a, O (x13 304&0 OS 0Mai 23. 33100. a 193.3 34.0.26., 14.41 _4e. 17.480.3.1' 7871.27* 1• 41.5141' a, a(ma) 3L0 IT03Jn7 ,r4(.20t (03.773.6' 03 3(513 4513 17486.10.40 (M 1.43/a' r01400 r.1a 3-3141' al a Mug Jar 1(481.VWr 10351..8' u' 0 9413' as O19W as 221037 ON a0W as 70[.33' au 331 2 u ,4 0U 0 057 233 IT W 1.411 1.03 a055' Om 300W MX 0.1 0 057 I•171 1(33 4&.31' Ir 431.3441' 321 0150 233 Ira Mali IT.2 023d 01, 049* 101. fr. Nara it 1(455014.1( (450JR3' MM aa57 a4 If4W..2Jr 4&'483119' Oa aOW 113 45460.2x1 24•ah'31 077 0057 all Ir460•27? Ira IJ069' an O (Sal) 236 IT WS 5,23,2' as a (fm) 230 an 0001 2341 1(46£01341• 0.45 w44&141' 1.11312, IT 265 0(97 1011 1T1i 13.133' 17.16 .sea' 4'483.43171' 236 a03 all 1(83.23d 5r235.364' 3'i a 057 all IS. 2'a 4-3234' le41•2304.•' (4&6 I-3'? an 0MI ata w'8N-3'H' d485a1J.' IT11Awns 4' ml 0057 a4& 5016 0403' 1(455.351 37 0 04&0 MW 17.3.3147 Ir. S.149' 1( 48 1310' 023 3057 mu raw ism.* (at sax' (35, 1.1.sr au a 657 M1 W. 44&4.3' W. ...AT IT RIS pall all 0ISM 1!111 0I101a13T a'A6sane lt4# 3.8117 30 0009 J51Y ra£JIIw' IT Sr *Wow' 89 0057 3441 4T4801730 .74831238. 1(481.3/11 36 ama 233 1(231.3[47 IT4a..4r 52-483.4847 as a 1557 al. 1( 45 ...mar *2.489-313' as aSW sun 7(481..0.1 sr as 3,119' W8 0031 ata ITAaw. .nT 1(155-.4311' MI 0057 Jan 1(114.,145 Ir469-31W 1r4Ar.ala' 33 0 M as 1(483.35.1 1r85*VIJr On a 005 233 IT ...Ur 171! i•a1r 00 0 O 313 0411084' IT OP5.aa' 00 01 Ow/ Iia 1(031.2347 5905.t)r ON 00141 ala 1r WSM52' /7831.2310 Ir WC[05d 30 0057 2347 1(ae sat Ow 231 a aap a so 189 0.00.413' IT 033.x01' LT Me osw4.00' 230.2.230• O0 064 MO ,r03[ -a0 1(03.-351 l23'e0.as1 0* a057 103 sT0w: sa1a" dlaC5011n' [DI 0057 41.3 1(..2341• IT We 5.03' all 0057 x1 NO Oran Ma 0MO ala (_04 57• IT OWLI011a' 0.016.321,' 4839n3' 3'U 0 O Ma 1(439.3[0 Wass [6347 014 0194& 3Ip (M92a3' x! 0057 234 ii. as 1.348• 1(M pad 1( 33 K414r aM a057 oma (at 1.alsr a4& OOa 0631 1(481.311' OW Kw 23.0 IWC pa rale £.1111' IT OC5.221' 5610 IDN MI rax[3'.u• rCYc-4847 23C awl 31.8 rat 0la01l r 3.1 WIN' SW 3'S au (836.21w' TOY0417.? row 314 233 ret0.4J,l 031[1.24*' saw a1( 233 rale 3.135 I' OW S-434• (307.233' Uri as an ra34.a41 rale S.8X 2'M 3.3111 1500 3.0 230 Tale .247 T O1 s2a15' 5941 190 319 raw: pax' rcar 1.511 as t9« Jan 7( 46 432.1( 1( a salT alr=,r S. ail (834010 (WS5,314! 393.15 5.4 233 or a3 [ail 1(WIp7a2• IT LW Iain' 92*249 550 239 (415,484' TPor tani7 *230 a 5 ail 2'M 4.1113• rM/an3' 9154 20 Dal 1783tame IT weCana (au10110 alms 230 230 1(831-110 IT04703231 rae 9.513' (me mama' 8341 MI 310 (ow Ewan' IMW3w' 431221 On 2311 2.413.3151' *79*7.10 (415.31' STOP SIGN SIGNAL BOX SOUL POLE 440 � LENT POLE Iw/JB0% CITY OF TUKWILA Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 http: //www. 7'ukwilaWA. gov RECEIVE ift.y 12 `tM COMMONI 1 Y [kW LUMEN r TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. **Please Print** SITE LOCATION" King Co. Assessor's Tax No.: See attached Site Address: Tukwila International Boulevard & 5 144th St Tenant Name: Tukwila Village Development Associates LP Suite Number: nia PROPERTY OWNS& Name: Carter Danne / Parametrix Name: City: Bellevue State: WA Address: Phone: 425-458-6200 Fax: City: State: Zip: A CONTACT;PERSON person receiving all,prolect ,comriii hicatlon.. _... -;'_ Name: Carter Danne / Parametrix Address: 411 108th Ave. NE City: Bellevue State: WA Zip: 98004 Phone: 425-458-6200 Fax: Email: CDANNE@PARAMETRIX.COM Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Tukwila Village Mixed-use / multi -phased development Type of Existing Use: Size of Existing Use: Is existing building vacant? yes Type of work: ❑ New 0 Addition EX Change of use Type of Proposed Use: mixed-use neighborhood center For how long? ❑ Remodel Size of Proposed Use: ❑ Tenant Improvement PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES Expiration — The concurrency test notice shall expire 90 days after issuance unless the applicant submits a SEPA or other documentation pursuant to TMC 21.04. If the submittal is made within 90 days, the test notice shall be valid for one calendar year from the date of issuance of the notice. Once the associated development permit or building permit is approved, the final concurrency certificate shall be valid for 2 years or as long as the developer possesses a valid building permit for the development. Extensions may be granted in accordance with TMC 9.50. Transferability —A certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land, but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. A certificate of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land use, density, and intensity described in the application for a development permit or building permit. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. PROPERTY 0 ►^ AUT OT: Signature: Print Name: 5-71.`"\yA`1 /r7, /r ✓IJ' � Mailing Address: d -°/f/— D-7 f( 1-4/"( SEI tr/•(j 17-, ft Z...r� fig �Il� 1/b P, lot 7.1-37/ City / I tale Zip Day Telephone: t? H:\Appliations\Fornu-Applications On Line\2012 Applications\Traffic Concurrency Application 2-9-12 doex LL Page 1 of 2 ik314 ltIl C V ►-UNM<:N1 Public Works Department 11).6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206.433.0179 CONCURRENCY TEST NOTICE SURFACE WATER For all development except one single-family residence, 2-9 lot short plats, four --plea or smaller multi -family residence, or non-residential development that is categorically exempt from SEPA. Submit a detailed project description including location, existing facilities, and proposed facilities. See attached PROJECT ADDRESS: andNEC Tukwilaand InSEC of S. 144th St.VI Blvd. PARCEL #: Contact's Name: Chris Miller, Barghausen Consulting Engineers Contact Phone #: (425) 251-6222 Contact e-mail: cmiller@barghausen.com Contact Address: 18215 -72nd Avenue SouthLKent, WA 98032 PASSED This test notice is valid fodays from signature date. Capacity of the concurrency facilities combined with the addition of any detention (if required) for the proposed development is equal to or better than capacity required to maintain the established level of service standard. Compliance with the City's adopted Surface Water Manual ensures concurrency and any additional items noted below. Additional items: DOES NOT PASS /4-'9 By: -0% Print Name: Ryan D. Larson Approved 01202006 . 4.34/3 Date Sr. Surface Water Engineer TUKWILA VILLAGE Tax Parcel Nos: 152304-9092 155420-0010 152304-9096 155420-0015 152304-9242 155420-0020 004000-0145 155420-0025 004000-0146 155420-0030 004000-0180 155420-0033 004000-0191 155420-0034 004000-0194 155420-0035 004000-0196 155420-0036 004000-0198 155420-0037 155420-0005 15255.007 *0 ORM G TOW, ETTER 312RM:10r 14-06 10.144fY. _e SO* AO, BOX 6-9550 Tpkiihig WA 9800 Phone:: 006) 2424$236 PO: (206) 2424 527 CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON-AVAILABILITY (11. /- \c1.0 Residentiali $50 t CertifiCate Of SOW& AA/affability „Ay COMMetriat 000 OR 0 Certificate Of Sewer NO -Availability . , Part A: (To Be Completed by Applicant) Purpose of • 0 )30lidlOg Permit ' .0 PrellOgnety Filot.or PUD 0 Other . . . ' ......,„,.. .... i U ShOit'SUbdivieleli 0 Rezone Pf9PPse0:*!K O. AosicioPfiiI Single Family 0 Residermal Multi oni)ty 0 lOommor0:01 0 Other .......:„.., . Applicants Name: Ari Consulting Engineers Phone: (425)251 -6222 Po3P00.1\44ross'or4Pro*PatoI000tiont,-: TeXI;Ot•Aimberi NEC/SEC, international BlvdL-84 S,144th.St. See attached .. ... . ' - - Legal Peti*OtiOrKttedti mapitid Legal beeCtiption if nebeettityy:, See attached plan . .. . .._ Part B: (To Be Completed by Sewer Agency) , -•• „ 1, 0 a Sewer'Sen'tideNtrill be provided by side sewer :0060*o only to an eXleting . . I . tiZeeelker feet earn the site and the sewer system has the opa-ogy to terVelhOOMpbSedtiee. . . 0023 b. Sewerservice will require an improvementto the sewer Vetere. Of: 0 (1) .. feet of sewer 'trunk or lateral to reach the ifte; andfor 0 (2) thCoristruotion:ofg otiootion system ori the site aotitior. , 13 (3) other (describe): Sii +i"S-...--iti. 1 to old 41 -ii. ,, of ..et veoe-1,40.--,-. I) ir; One:. city '46,1,- We. y4.1040. #4, ell .. .. . . , . . . . . . . ,. ... . , . (Must be completed if 4.0:.41?00 is checked) a. The sewer SyStertilniOreVernent is in conformancewith a County approved sewer comprehensive plan, OR 0 11 The sewer system:improvement Will reqUire.ateWer comprehensive plan arneridnient, . . . . . . . 3.. 10 t. The proposed project it within the corporate limits of the Dittifot,,Or has beengranted boundary Review Board approval for.eicteneiOri of SeiVicie•CiutSide theDiStrict, 00 Li b, Annexation or BRB approval will tie necessary to OroVideservloe. • ' . 4. SerVIO6 le eUbjedttellie.folleiring: PERMIT .•:`.$ 0 i p $—./ st, 14 10 :11•141.1' b. District Conneetion ChargetOue prier to bonheOtleo: - 0 y• -.q• GECt $ . . SF.C:..$ . .. , , tiNtt: $ . ..'TOTAL ($tibiaeit 10 Ohange on January let) A Nag County/METRO Cepacity Ohergqv/lithe tiiileCtdirectlyty King:0?urity EifteroonneCtion telthe seWereystent L EaOrti.e.ritt 5i Required 0 May be Required c.- Other: roie ,Ii - 1e#/ .10"0./e," .o. -e., ci x tv,e. ' e..e..* 0,if ..i 9, eiri 4.,:A 74- cc, y, ., . . !hereby Certify that the above sewer agency" infotmatioh is true. ThiS Certification shall be valid for one year frorn the date Of signature. Titl� Pate hi2e7/ 3 ATTACHMENT TO VAL yITE SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY/NON-AVAILABILITY 1Lefollowin" g terms and Conditions apply tO the attaelied Val VW Sewer District (istrice) • _Certificate of Sewer Availability/Non-AVAilability ("Certificate'). 1, This Certificate is valid only for thereal property referenced herein ("Property'), Which is in the District's service area, for the sole purpose of submission to the Icing county Department of Development 'and Environmental Services, King CountyDepartment of Public Health, City Of Seattle, City of Tukwila, City of Butien taint City of Seatac. This Certificate is between the District and the applicant only, and no third person or party shall have Any rights hereunder Whether by agency, third -party beneficiary principles or otherwise. 2 This Ceftiifcate Creates AO Contractual relationship between the District and the applicant and itaSitedetsOtt and attigriktind doe§ not Constitine and tidy not beitlied-upOti as theDistrict't guarantee that savOt$ellrict will be available at the tithe the applicant May apply tolhe District for such setvite. 3. A. offhe 449 tho VistriPt7 AtglOtte 99thiS Crti0949i t11„9.015itiCt rePtesOtS'iltattONYOr service is available to the Property through sewer systems that exist or that may be,eitended by the apPlicant. TheDislnct makes no other representations, express or imphed, including without limitation that the applicant *ill be able toOlitain the PeedSky permits,, Approvals and authorizations fromiCing county, City of Seattle? City of Tukwila, City of Bunen, City of SeaTac or anyother governmental agency before the Applicant can utilize the sewer' serViCe which is the Subjed ofthis Certificate. 4. If the Dittrict or the applicant nintt ;extend the Dittricrt sewer system to provide sewer service to the Property, the District or applicant maybe requiredto obtain fromthe appropriate governmental agency the necessary permits, approvals and authorizations, In addition, the governmental agency may establish teclUireifietita that mnt be satisfied as a condition of granting any such permits, approvals itthotiiation§iWhich may niake impractical ractieal.or iinpottible the prevision ofsewer services to the PtOperty. S. Application f9raAtIP9sil)1913tOviOnn of. OPWqr to PrPpertY *111)c subject in 444 conditionedupon availability of sewer service to the Property attlle time QTaach application, and compliance -with federal, ttate„ ideal and DiStrietlaWs, OrdMan:oda policiet„ and/orregulatitins in effect at the tithe Of Stich application. Picknowtedgc titatZhavethoeettiftegto Of Sew& and thiF Attackneol, grid:fully understand the terms and conditions herein. Applicant's Signature bee :2/EWO1 3 4 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenler Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Web site: http://www.ciaiikwilawatis CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY PERMIT NO.: Part: To be completed byappUcant Site address (attach inap and legal description showing hydrant location and size of main): NEC & SEC of International Blvd. and S. 144th St. Owner information Agent/Contact Person. Name: Tukwila Village Development Assoc., Inc. Name Ali Sadr; Barghausen Consulting Engineers Address; 201 -27th Ave: S.E., Puyallup, WA 98374 Address: 18215=72nd Ave. S., Kent WA 98032 Phone: (253) 231-5001 Phone: (425) 251-6222 This cenificate is for the purposes of ❑ Residential Building Penni! ❑ Commercial/Industrial Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Rezone ❑ Short Subdivision ❑p Other Mix -Use Residential/Comm Estimated number of service connections and water meter size(s): 6 connections with meter sizes ranging from 1 -inch to 3 -inch Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point or stricture is 40 6. Arca is served by (Water Utility District): King County Water District No. 125 . 2/812013 Date Part If: To be compteted by water utility district 1. The proposed project is Within 2. Q No improvements required. '.(City/County) 3. The improvements required Mt—impede tht water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plan Or meet the minimum flow requirements of the project before connection and to meet the State cross connection control requirements: . D E v E h, o Pr:WS x TE i s N_u1 ' i E • .4, 4 i L4BLE i nJ t.eJA'TEtR A i 57AiCr D7=f- , LA) 14 Fn., -A7L3 (Use separate sheet if mote nrom is needed) 4. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a flow of 314)0 gpm at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of - a , cj . fps as documented by the attached calculations. 5. Water availability: 12 -----Acceptable service can be provided to this project O Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in item 13-2 arc met. Q System is not capable of providing service to this project. i hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. kiss-YE/Coo W 0 ATE 1 STRiCT (25 Agcnc}?Phonc 2Drc- 2..d-12_-7547 Prim,: 9.1401 Revved: 1-2009 13y 2— t1-13 Date cApiaas -tt-f`() Certificate of Water Availability King County Water District No. in s The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Certificate of Availability (`Certificate") 1. This Certificate of Water Availability is valid only for the real property referenced herein for the sole purpose of submission to the City of Tukwila ("City"). This Certificate is issued at the request of the City and is not assignable or transferable to any other party. Further, no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency or as a third party beneficiary or otherwise. 2. The District makes no representations, expressed or implied, the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals and authorization from the City or any other applicable land use jurisdiction or governmental agency necessary before applicant can utilize the utility service which is the subject of this Certificate. 3. As of the date of the issuance of this Certificate, the District has water available to provide utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate, and the utility systems exist or may be extended by the applicant to provide service to such property. However, the issuance of this Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant or the City, and the issuance of this Certificate may not be relied upon and does not constitute the District's guarantee that water utility service will be available to the real property at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 4. Application for and the possible provision of District utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate shall be subject to and conditioned upon the availability of water service to the real property at the time of such application, as well as all application for utility service, including conservation, water restrictions, and other policies and regulation then in effect. Applicant's Signature Date ak 1l5 District Representative ILh Lt P� ��,'�, ;�" Date i '11-1 3 RECEIVED JUK 12 nrei DLVL-LUI'MLNT TUKWILA VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION May 28, 2013 The Applicant is Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC, a Washington limited liability company. The proposed Tukwila Village Development (the "Project") is mixed-use, multi -phase development of a site owned by the City of Tukwila located at the northeast corner and the southeast corner of the intersection of Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 144th Street (the "Project Site"). The Applicant has obtained the exclusive right to acquire the Project Site and to develop the Project pursuant to that certain the Disposition and Development Agreement dated as of October 30, 2012 entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, as approved by motion of the Tukwila City Council at a Special Meeting on October 22, 2012 (the "Disposition and Development Agreement). The Project Site consists of approximately 187,000 square feet of land immediately north of S. 144th Street and east of Tukwila International Boulevard (including approximately 23,000 square feet of 41st Avenue right of way to be vacated by the City of Tukwila) plus approximately 90,000 square feet of land immediately south of S. 144th Street and east of Tukwila International Boulevard, for a total of approximately 277,000 square feet or 6.4 acres of land. The Project Site consists of multiple parcels or tax lots which will be consolidated and/or subdivided into Development Parcels pursuant to a Boundary Line Adjustment ("BLA") application submitted by the Applicant simultaneously herewith in accordance with the Disposition and Development Agreement. The proposed Development Parcels are illustrated on the Proposed Site Plan submitted by the Applicant simultaneously herewith in accordance with the Disposition and Development Agreement. Development of the Project will occur in phases on the corresponding Development Parcels in accordance with the Phased Development Plan submitted by the Applicant simultaneously herewith in accordance with the Disposition and Development Agreement. The proposed Project is being developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Disposition and Development Agreement, and the Development Agreement dated as of December 21, 2012 entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, as approved by the Tukwila City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 2391 adopted on December 10, 2012. 1 The following Project Description will correspond to the development of each three (3) Development Phases occurring on each of the corresponding Development Parcels in accordance with the Phased Development Plan. In addition to the three (3) Development Phases on the corresponding Development Parcels, the development of a public outdoor landscaped "open space" Plaza (the "Community Plaza") and a public indoor Commons or "community" building coupled with a private Cafe / Coffee Shop (collectively, the "Community Commons Building"), will occur on a separate Development Parcel known as the "Plaza Parcel." In accordance with the Disposition and Development Agreement, the development of Phase 1 must be accompanied by the development of the Community Plaza and the Community Commons Building on the Plaza Parcel. Phase 1 Phase 1 of the Project will be developed and constructed on the Development Parcel labeled "Phase 1" on the Phased Development Plan with a single mixed-use structure labeled as "Building A." The Plaza Parcel is also included in and labeled "Phase 1" for the reasons described above, but the description of the Plaza Parcel development is provided separately below. The site area of the Phase 1 Development Parcel (excluding the Plaza Parcel) is approximately 63,989 square feet or 1.47 acres. Phase 1 of the Project to be developed and constructed on the Phase 1 Development Parcel (excluding the Plaza Parcel) will consist of a single structure (Building A) including two (2) levels of structured parking containing 85 garage parking stalls for residential use only (Level P1 below grade and Level 1 at grade), approximately 8,165 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space, approximately 1,271 square feet of lobby, management office and amenity space, and four (4) live -work studio loft dwelling units (Level 1 at grade), five (5) levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 6) containing a mix of studio, one -bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, private and semi -private outdoor landscaped terraces (Level 2), a south facing public outdoor landscaped terrace (Level 5), private exterior decks on selected residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 6), approximately 43 surface parking stalls for residential and commercial/retail use, and various other landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower two (2) levels (Level Pland Level 1) consist of Type IA (post -tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper five (5) levels (Levels 2 - 6) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. There are a total of 84 dwelling units including 4 live -work studio loft dwelling units, 39 one - bedroom apartment units, and 31 two-bedroom apartment units. The average rentable floor area of the four (4) live -work studio loft dwelling units is approximately 665 square feet. The average rentable floor area of the ten (10) studio apartment units is approximately 463 square feet. The average rentable floor area of the 39 one -bedroom apartment units is approximately 650 square feet, with a range from approximately 618 square feet to approximately 677 square feet. The 2 average rentable floor area of the 31 two-bedroom apartment units is approximately 951 square feet, with a range from approximately 878 square feet to approximately 985 square feet. The gross building area of Building A is approximately 119,493 square feet, including approximately 78,944 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 8,165 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space, approximately 23,380 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 9,004 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Phase 2 Phase 2 of the Project will be developed and constructed on the Development Parcel labeled "Phase 2" on the Phased Development Plan with a two (2) mixed-use structures labeled as "Building D" and "Building E," respectively. The site area of the Phase 2 Development Parcel is approximately 84,310 square feet or 1.94 acres. Phase 2 of the Project to be developed and constructed on the Phase 2 Development Parcel will consist of two (2) mid -rise structures. Building D includes one (1) level of below grade structured parking (Level P1) containing 49 garage parking stalls (including 43 stalls for residential use and 6 for commercial office use), approximately 2,090 square of rentable storage and residential amenity space (Level P1), approximately 13,000 gross rentable square feet of commercial office space (Level 1 and Level 1 Mezzanine), five (5) levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 6) containing a mix of one - bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, approximately 22 surface parking stalls for commercial office use, and various other landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower two (2) levels (Level Pland Level 1) consist of Type IA (post -tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper five (5) levels (Levels 2 - 6) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. There are a total of 70 dwelling units in Building D including 35 one -bedroom apartment units, and 35 two-bedroom apartment units. The average rentable floor area of the 35 one -bedroom apartment units is approximately 587 square feet, with a range from approximately 475 square feet to approximately 658 square feet. The average rentable floor area of the 35 two-bedroom apartment units is approximately 758 square feet, with a range from approximately 715 square feet to approximately 825 square feet. The gross building area of Building D is approximately 97,130 square feet, including approximately 64,330 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 13,000 gross rentable square feet of commercial office space, approximately 17,630 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 1,520 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Building E includes one (1) level of structured parking containing 70 garage parking stalls for residential use only (Level 1 at grade), approximately 1,150 gross rentable square feet of 3 commercial/retail space, approximately 2,000 gross rentable square feet of police resource center space, and approximately 1,200 square feet of lobby and management office space (Level 1 at grade), four (4) levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 5) containing a mix of one - bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, semi -private outdoor landscaped courtyard (Level 1 at grade), private exterior decks on selected residential dwelling units (Levels 3 - 4), approximately 7 surface parking stalls for commercial/retail use, and various other landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower level (Level 1) consists of Type IA (post -tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper four (4) levels (Levels 2 - 5) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. There are a total of 124 dwelling units in Building E, including 70 one -bedroom apartment units and 54 two-bedroom apartment units. The average rentable floor area of the 70 one -bedroom apartment units is approximately 556 square feet, with a range from approximately 475 square feet to approximately 720 square feet. The average rentable floor area of the 48 two-bedroom apartment units is approximately 732 square feet, with a range from approximately 751 square feet to approximately 819 square feet. The gross building area of Building E is approximately 134,960 square feet, including approximately 101,670 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 3,150 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail and police resource center space, approximately 25,968 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 4,172 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Phase 3 Phase 3 of the Project will be developed and constructed on the Development Parcel labeled "Phase 3" on the Phased Development Plan with a single mixed-use structure labeled as "Building B." The site area of the Phase 3 Development Parcel is approximately 66,178 square feet or 1.52 acres. Phase 3 of the Project to be developed and constructed on the Phase 3 Development Parcel will consist of a single structure (Building B) including one (1) level of structured parking containing 70 garage parking stalls for residential use only (Level 1 at grade), approximately 1,800 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space and approximately 4,450 square feet of residential amenity space (Level 1 at grade), four (4) levels of residential dwelling units (Levels 2 - 5) containing a mix of one -bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, private and semi -private outdoor landscaped terraces and courtyard (Level 2), private exterior decks on selected residential dwelling units (Levels 3 - 4), approximately 16 surface parking stalls for commercial/retail and flex use, and various other landscaping, indoor and outdoor common areas and community facilities. The lower level (Level 1) consists of Type IA (post - tension reinforced concrete) construction and the upper four (4) levels (Levels 2 - 5) consist of Type VA (wood -frame) construction. 4 There are a total of 125 dwelling units in Building B, including 77 one -bedroom apartment units and 48 two-bedroom apartment units. The average rentable floor area of the 77 one -bedroom apartment units is approximately 566 square feet, with a range from approximately 475 square feet to approximately 720 square feet. The average rentable floor area of the 48 two-bedroom apartment units is approximately 730 square feet, with a range from approximately 715 square feet to approximately 751 square feet. The gross building area of Building B is approximately 132,085 square feet, including approximately 102,375 square feet of gross residential floor area, approximately 1,800 gross rentable square feet of commercial/retail space, approximately 25,600 gross square feet of structured parking, and approximately 2,310 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms). Plaza Parcel Community Plaza and the Community Commons Building will be developed and constructed on the Plaza Parcel, the other Development Parcel labeled "Phase 1" on the Phased Development Plan, with a single mixed-use structure labeled as "Building C." The site area of the Plaza Parcel is approximately 31,863 square feet or 0.73 acres. Community Plaza will consist of a wide variety of landscaped and hardscaped areas designed in accordance with the "Statement of Purpose and Design" for the Outdoor Plaza as contemplated in the Disposition and Development Agreement. The Community Commons Building to be developed and constructed on the Plaza Parcel will consist of one (1) single level structure including (i) a large flex space community room designed in accordance with the "Statement of Purpose and Design" for the Indoor Commons as contemplated in the Disposition and Development Agreement containing approximately 1,711 gross square feet of assembly space, (ii) a catering kitchen containing approximately 368 gross square feet of space, (iii) approximately 200 gross square feet of storage space, (iv) approximately 215 gross square feet of reception space, (v) approximately 360 gross square feet of men's & women's public restroom space, (vi) approximately 88 gross square feet of building services areas (e.g., mechanical and utility rooms), and (vii) a Cafe / Coffee Shop containing approximately 1,268 gross square feet of retail space, including seating area, kitchen area, refrigeration area and office area. The gross building area of the Community Commons Building (Building C) is approximately 4,210 square feet. The Community Commons Building will have a covered entry of approximately 400 square feet of covered area, an indoor/outdoor fireplace and outdoor seating area. The Commons and the Cafe / Coffee Shop will share the reception space, the public restroom space, building services areas, the covered entry area, the indoor/outdoor fireplace and the outdoor seating area. The Plaza Parcel also contains approximately 20 surface parking stalls dedicated for use by visitors and retail customers of the Commons and the Cafe / Coffee Shop. 5 Library Branch The Library Branch to be developed and constructed on the Library Parcel by the King County Library System is the subject of a separate Design Review application and is included in the Proposed Site Plan and the SEPA checklist but not in the accompanying Design Review submittal for Phase 1 of the Project. The Library Branch will contain approximately 10,000 gross square feet of space and feature a "green roof' with an area of approximately 8,395 square feet. The total impervious surface area contained on the Library Parcel is 12,220 square feet. Parking The completed Project will provide a total of approximately 463 parking stalls, including (i) 127 on-site surface parking stalls, (ii) 300 on-site structured parking garage stalls, (iii) 18 on-site surface parking stalls dedicated to the adjacent Riverton Terrace public housing project pursuant to a parking easement, and (v) 18 new on -street parking stalls. 6 A COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: ✓ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. ✓ 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). ✓ 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". ✓ 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. 1 PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: ✓ 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). ✓ 7. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. 8. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. H:U.and Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail:: planning@TukwilaWA.gov SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW INFORMATION The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a development before making decisions (43.21C RCW). The purpose of environmental review is to identify a proposal's significant adverse impacts, measures to minimize or avoid such impacts, and allow wide public review for a wide range of projects. REQUIREMENTS: SEPA review is required for any action associated with the following types of decisions: 1. Developing 10 or more dwelling units. 2. Developing agricultural structures over 10,000 s.f. 3. Developing office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings over 12,000 s.f. and 40 parking spaces (certain utility lines, personal wireless communication facilities, and normal maintenance/replacement activities are fully exempt). 4. Developing parking lots with over 40 spaces. 5. Landfills and excavations over 500 cubic yards. 6. Installation of impervious underground tanks with a capacity over 10,000 gallons. The accompanying application must be completed for any new SEPA application or request to issue an addendum to any previous SEPA determination. If a question does not apply, "Does not apply" or "NA" may be entered. Complete answers to the checklist may avoid unnecessary delays later. City staff may also be able to help about governmental designations (e.g., zoning, shoreline, and landmark status). PROCEDURES: At the time you submit your application you must have all of the items listed on the attached "Complete Application Checklist" as well as the submittal for the underlying action (building permit, subdivision etc.). You may request a waiver from items on the checklist that are not applicable to your project. Please discuss this waiver request with City staff either at a pre -application meeting or at the time of application submittal. Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff will determine if it is complete based on the attached checklist. If not complete City staff will mail to you a letter outlining what additional information is needed. If you do not submit requested materials within 90 days from the City's request for additional information the City may cancel your application. Once the application is "complete," substantive review will begin and a "Notice of Application" must be posted/mailed to begin a public comment period. After completing the environmental analysis and considering public comments, the Director will issue a determination for the project. A Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) says that the project as proposed will not have probable, significant, negative environmental impacts. A mitigated DNS will be issued if the project must be modified to mitigate its negative impacts. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared if the probable negative impacts are unavoidable. H:\Land Use Applications In PDF Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at (city), (state), on , 20 (Print Name) (Address) (Phone Number) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires on H:U,and Use Applications In PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc City of 1 ukwila ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 05/28/2013 Applicant Name: Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC Street Address: 201 - 27th Avenue SE, Building A, Suite 300 City, State, Zip: Puyallup, WA 98374 Telephone: (253) 231-5001 DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 1 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 1 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 6-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete 1 YES — Checklist Complete H:U,and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doe Page 2 City of 1 ukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 ✓ Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) ✓ YES - Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) H:V,and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 3 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 ✓ Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) H:U,and Use Applications in PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 ✓ Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 • 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 5 Part D (continued) City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Tukwila Village 2. Name of Applicant: Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC 3. Date checklist prepared: May 28, 2013 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): See Phased Development Plan attached hereto. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment dated November 30, 2011 prepared by Associates Earth Sciences, Inc.; and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment dated November 22, 2011 prepared by Associates Earth Sciences, Inc. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. A Design Review application for a 10,000 sq. ft. Library Branch submitted by the King County Library System. H:Uand Use Applications in POFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Agency Comments Page 1 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Storm Water Discharge Permit Proposed Site Plan Approval Phased Development Plan Approval Boundary Line Adjustment Approval; and Street Vacation (41st Avenue) Design Review Approvals - Phase 1, 2 & 3 Demolition Permits, Clearing & Grading Permits and Foundation Permits - Phase 1, 2 & 3 Engineering Permits and Building Permits - Phase 1, 2 & 3 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal relates to the Tukwila Village redevelopment as contemplated in the Disposition and Development Agreement dated as of October 30, 2012 entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, as approved by motion of the Tukwila City Council at a Special Meeting on October 22, 2012, and the Development Agreement dated as of December 21, 2012 entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, as approved by the Tukwila City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 2391 adopted on December 10, 2012. A brief Project Description is attached hereto. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is located at the northeast corner and the southeast corner of the intersection of Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 144th Street. A list of Tax Lots and a Legal Description are also attached hereto. A Proposed Site Plan, a Vicinity Map and a Topographic map are all included in the Architectural plans and drawings and the Civil Engineering plans and drawings submitted in connection with the Design Review submittal related to Phase 1 of the Tukwila Village redevelopment proposal. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. RECEIVED JUN 12 2013 H:V.and Use Applications in PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 2 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Flat with gradual slope toward the east, northeast and southeast. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 8% slope from the west to the southeast corner on the portion of the the project site south of S. 144th Street. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Existing fill material not suitable for structural support was observed in all but two (2) of the 20 exploratory locations at depths ranging from 3 to 13 feet and consisted of loose to medium granular sediments. Below the existing fill material and below the surficial topsoil where no existing fill was encountered, explorations encountered medium dense sand and silt with gravel interpreted to represent Vashon ice contact sediments with widely varying density and textural characteristics and highly moisture -sensitive. See Attachment B.l.c. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. The site does not have any significant risk of seismically induced ground rupture, landslides, liquifaction (when mitigated by the use of a deep foundation system as recommended), or ground motion (when mitigated by the uses of the proper structural design class of buildings as recommended). e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Re -use of excavated and properly moisture -conditioned Vashon ice contact sediment is acceptable. Otherwise, imported structural fill will be required. The quantities of cut and fill material are approximately 3,930 cubic yards of cut, and 31,210 cubic yards of fill material. H:\Land Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 3 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. The potential erosion could be significant if soils were exposed without adequate mitigation measures. However, the most effective mitigation is adequate ground cover measures such as erosion control matting, plastic sheeting, straw mulch, crushed rock, recycled concrete or mature hydroseed. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 81% of the total site area will be covered with impervious surface including the proposed new Library Branch. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Ground cover atop disturbed soils such as erosion control matting, plastic sheeting, straw mulch, crushed rock, recycled concrete or mature hydroseed. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions to the air during construction could result from dust during clearing, excavation and grading and from the operation of construction equipment and vehicles on-site of adjacent to the site. Emissions to the air from operations after completion of construction would result from natural gas consumed by gas-fired boilers on-site to provide hot water, vehicles operated on-site by tenants, employees and visitors, or maintenance equipment operated on-site by employees or independent contractors. Quantities are unknown. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Emissions from vehicular traffic along adjacent Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 144th Street. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 4 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Erosion control measures, as well as site watering and street cleaning measures, will reduce or control the impact of dust emissions. Use of mass transit by construction workers would reduce vehicular emissions during construction. Use of mass transit and alternate modes of transportation by residents (such as dedicated transit vans and electric vehicles and/or car -sharing programs would reduce vehicular emissions from operations. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. FL land Use Applications in PDF'SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 5 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None, other than automotive oils and fuels normally conveyed by storm water. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ground water will be withdrawn. The only water that will be discharged will be storm water and residential waste water conveyed via the sanitary sewer system. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 6 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None. All domestic sewage will be conveyed via the sanitary sewer system. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The sources of runoff include storm water from rain, occasional snow melt, and landscape irrigation. The method of collection is by means of roof drains, footing drains and catch basins and disposal is by means of on-site detention. While exact quantities are unknown, the volume of on-site detention capacity is designed to greatly exceed relative historic runoff volumes. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. In general, no, due to water quality treatment facilities that compliment the on-site detention system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Rain gardens, pervious pavement, and "green" roofs are expected to be utilized to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ✓ Deciduous tree: alder, aple as en, other 1 Evergreen tree:r, ceda pine, other 1 Shrubs 1 Grass volunteer grasses and weeds Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site contains a wide variety or predominantly ornamental trees and shrubs. The proposal includes the intended preservation of the significant Coast Redwood Tree located in the southeast comer of the portion of the property that lies north of S. 144th Street. Per the attached Arborist Report, the majority of the site trees are drought -stressed, excessively pruned and/or unaesthetic. Accordingly, with the exception of the Coast Redwood Tree, all other vegetation will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposed landscape plan consists of replacing existing trees and shrubs with an appropriate mix of native and ornamental trees, shrubs, grasses and ground cover material. This will include new and more appropriate varieties of deciduous street trees along the Tukwila International Boulevard frontage and along the frontage of both sides of S. 144th Street. In addition, the proposed landscape design will embrace the criteria outlined in the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) guidelines. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle,ongbir other: seagulls Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric, natural gas and diesel fuel energy resources, and potentially, solar power energy resources, will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs Electricity will be used for lighting and space heating in dwelling units, commercial/retail areas and common areas, and for ventilation and air conditioning in commercial/retail and common areas. diesel fuel will be used to power emergency generators. Natural gas will be used to provide hot water to dwelling units by means of gas-fired boilers. If determined to be financially feasible, solar power may be used to augment or offset the demand for electrical energy. H:V,and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 9 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. The overall impact of the proposed project on the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties would appear to be relatively minimal and would be limited to those properties immediately east of the project site -- the Normandy Court Apartments and the Riverton Terrace Apartments. A maximum of approximately 20% of the rooftop of Normandy Court would experience moderate shading starting in the early afternoon. A very small portion of the Riverton Terrace rooftop might experience minimal shading only in the late afternoon. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Adherence to the Seattle City Light Built Smart for Affordable Housing Program will result in the use of energy efficient light fixtures and appliances, energy efficient windows and low -flow showerheads, among other features. The use of dedicated transit vans and alternate transportation options, such as electric plug-in vehicles and charging stations and car -sharing programs, will reduce the overall energy consumption attributable to the operation of the proposed project. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire department and emergency medical services may be required from time to time due to the higher concentration of elderly individuals that is anticipated to reside in the proposed project. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. H:U.and Use Applications in PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 10 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Primarily traffic noise associated with vehicular traffic along Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 144th Street, and potential aircraft noise from takeoffs and landings at SeaTac International Airport. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise from vehicular traffic and construction equipment in the short-term during construction of the proposed project, and only routine noise from vehicular traffic and from the operation of HVAC, and occasional noise from the operation of emergency generators and maintenance equipment on a long-term basis. Noise during construction would be limited to approximately 6:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays (Monday - Fridays) and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Long-term noise tends to be limited to daylight hours. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Traffic control plans and restricted construction hours to reduce or control noise impacts during construction. The use of dedicated transit vans, electric plug-in vehicles and car -sharing programs for residents, as well as structured parking garages for resident parking, to reduce or control noise impacts on a long-term basis. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The portion of the site located north of S. 144th Street is vacant land consisting of gravel, asphalt paving and vegetation. The portion of 41st Avenue located immediately north of S.144th Street is a public street which will be vacated. The portion of the site located south of S. 144th Street contains the following uses: (i) a vacant restaurant building and parking lot, (ii) a small commercial building containing a barbershop (currently open for business, (iii) parking easement for adjacent Riverton Terrace public housing project, (iv) a storage yard and storage building for the City of Tukwila, (v) ... continued on Attachment B.8.a. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. H:U.and Use Applications in PDFVSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 11 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing structures on-site north of S. 144th Street include the portion of 41st Avenue to be vacated. Existing structures on-site south of S. 144th Street include the following: (i) a vacant restaurant building, (ii) a small commercial building containing a barbershop (currently open for business, (iii) a storage building for the City of Tukwila, (iv) a two -car garage, (v) a basketball court. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification for the portion of the site north of S. 144th Street is NCC (Neighborhood Commercial Center). The current zoning classification for the portion of the site south of S. 144th Street is NCC (Neighborhood Commercial Center) adjacent to Tukwila International Boulevard and the remainder is designated HDR (High Density Residential)/Commercial Redevelopment Area. The entire site is located in the Tukwila International Boulevard Urban Renewal Overlay District. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The City of Tukwila's current comprehensive plan designations of the site is the same as its current zoning classifications.See the response to Item B.8.e. above. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 12 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? J• We estimate that approximately 496 people would reside on-site and approximately 71 people would work on-site in the completed project. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The completed project would displace no residential dwelling units. The completed project would displace the storage yard and building utilized by the City of Tukwila, the parking in the two -car garage, and the use of the basketball court. The completed project would temporarily displace the barbershop, as the operators have indicated a desire to relocate their barbershop into the completed project. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: One of the purposes of the Disposition and Development Agreement, and the Development Agreement, entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, is to ensure that the Tukwila Village redevelopment as contemplated is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 13 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Approximately 84 dwelling units would be provided in Phase 1 of Tukwila Village which would be non -age restricted mixed -income, including 20% low-income and 80% market rate. Approximately 194 dwelling units would be provided in Phase 2 of Tukwila Village which would be age -restricted (senior living), including 30% low-income and 70% moderate -income. Approximately 125 dwelling units would be provided in Phase 3 of the Tukwila Village redevelopment which would be age -restricted (senior living) mixed -income, including 20% low-income and 80% market rate. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of proposed structures along Tukwila Intemational Boulevard will be 70 feet, and elsewhere will be 65 feet. The principal exterior building materials will be brick masonry, metal and glass at the lower levels and painted metal siding, painted horizontal fiber cement lap siding and painted vertical fiber cement panels at the upper levels. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Southerly views of Mt. Rainier from Tukwila Intemational Boulevard and the property immediately north of the project site may be partially obstructed by the construction of Buildings D & E of Phase 2 of the Tukwila Village redevelopment. However, no existing residential views in the immediate vicinity will be obstructed. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The location and design of the public outdoor Plaza, the location and design of the low-rise public indoor Commons and the location and design of the low-rise public Library Branch are intended to maintain the transparency and openness of the proposed Tukwila Village redevelopment and to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. One of the purposes of the Disposition and Development Agreement, and the Development Agreement, entered into by and between the City of Tukwila and Tukwila Village Associates, LLC, is to reduce or control aesthetic impacts of the Tukwila Village redevelopment. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed redevelopment would produce light or glare from vehicular traffic, interior and exterior building lighting and street lighting, which would occur primarily in the evenings. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, it is unlikely that light or glare from the finished project would be a safety hazard or interfere with views. New street lighting is likely to improve safety. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Structured parking garages for resident parking tends to reduce or minimize the impact of light and glare from a significant component of vehicular traffic on-site. The use of light shades and uplighting tends to reduce the impact of exterior building and site lighting and street lighting. H:V.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 15 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are no major designed or informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity other than those provided on the site of the Foster High School one block to the east of the project site and the existing basketball court on the portion of the project site south of S. 144th Street. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposed project would displace the existing basketball court on the portion of the project site south of S. 144th Street. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Recreational opportunities to be provided by the proposed Tukwila Village redevelopment include the multi -functional public outdoor Plaza and indoor Commons, as well as the recreational opportunities to be provided by the proposed new Library Branch. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. H:U.and Use Applications in PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 16 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently served by Tukwila International Boulevard (State Highway 99) and S. 144th Street, and 41st Avenue which is to be vacated. Proposed access to the existing street system to and from the project site are reflected on the Proposed Site Plan. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide a total of approximately 463 parking stalls, including (i) 127 on-site surface parking stalls, (ii) 300 on-site structured parking garage stalls, (iii) 18 on-site surface parking stalls dedicated to the adjacent Riverton Terrace public housing project pursuant to a parking easement, and (v) 18 new on -street parking stalls. Approximately 32 on-site parking stalls serving business will be eliminated. The 18 existing on-site surface parking stalls dedicated to Riverton Terrace will be replaced. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 17 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal does not require any new public roads or streets but will require new private roadways to provide access and circulation. The proposal will require new frontage improvements along Tukwila International Boulevard adjacent to the project site and new frontage and half -street improvements on both sides of S. 144th Street adjacent to the project site e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project will not directly use water, rail or air transportation. However, the project will occur within the general vicinity of the new light rail station (approximately 10 blocks south on Tukwila International Boulevard) and within the general vicinity of SeaTac Airport(approximately one mile south on Tukwila International Boulevard). f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 3,505 new vehicular trips per weekday, including approximately 162 new A.M. peak hour trips and approximately 328 new P.M. peak hour trips. See the attached Traffic Impact Analysis Technical Memorandum dated May 28, 2013 prepared by Parametrix. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The predominance of senior living residential dwelling units in the proposed project tends to reduce traffic and parking impacts. The use of alternate transportation options such as dedicated transit vans and car -sharing programs and shared parking arrangements tends to reduce traffic and parking impacts in connection with the proposed project. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The completed project will result in a need for public services such as fire protection, police protection, health care, schools and emergency medical services, but rather than increase the overall need, it is more likely to centralize and concentrate the need into a convenient location. All covered floor areas will be fully sprinklered with smoke alarms, audio and visual fire alarms and CO detectors. The completed project will contain a police resource center. A new medical/dental center will be co -located adjacent to the project to serve the needs of the new community. Foster High School is located one block east. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 18 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. All covered floor areas will be fully sprinklered with smoke alarms, audio and visual fire alarms and CO detectors. The completed project will contain a police resource center. A new medical/dental center will be co -located adjacent to the project to serve the needs of the new community. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity €tural ga� system other: septic b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Seattle City Light (installation of transformers, electrical vaults and distribution) Water - King County Water District #125 (extension of water main down S. 144th Street across Tukwila International Boulevard and looping on-site). Natural Gas - Puget Sound Energy (extension of natural gas main along Tukwila International Boulevard) ... Continuation on Attachment B.16.b. H:V.and Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 19 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: H:\Land Use Applications in PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 20 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? H:V.and Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 21 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: / A• Date Submitted: 05/28/2013 H:\Land Use Applications in PDFI.SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 22 Attachment B.1.c. See the attached Geotechnical Engineering Report dated March 18, 2013, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, including in particular the discussion of "Vashon Lodgement Till" on page 5. Attachment B.8.a. (v) two car garage, and (vi) basketball court. Attachment B.16.b. Refuse Service — Waste Management (Construct staging area) Telephone — Century Link (Pull cabling) Sanitary Sewer — Valley Vue Sewer District (Relocation of sewer line) TUKWILA VILLAGE Tax Parcel Nos: 152304-9092 155420-0010 152304-9096 155420-0015 152304-9242 155420-0020 004000-0145 155420-0025 004000-0146 155420-0030 004000-0180 155420-0033 004000-0191 155420-0034 004000-0194 155420-0035 004000-0196 155420-0036 004000-0198 155420-0037 155420-0005 15255.007 Name: PARCEL A North: 176582.4911' Segment #1 : Line Course: S19°27'24"W North: 176550.6401' Segment #2 : Line East: 1278267.3384' Length: 33.78' East: 1278256.0865' Course: N70°32'36'9 Length: 119.35' North: 176590.3949' East 1278143.5521' Segment #3 : Curve Length: 343.54' Radius: 1960.00' Delta: 010°02'33" Tangent 172.21' Chord: 343.10' Course: N14°52'01"E Course In: N70°06'43' W Course Out: S80°09'16"E RP North: 177257.1546' East 1276300.4484' End North: 176922.0084' East: 1278231.5820' Segment #4 : Line Course: N73°14'00"E Length: 151.66' North: 176965.7585' East: 1278376.7945' Segment #5 : Line Course: S07°15'12"E Length: 135.11' North: 176831.7297' East: 1278393.8531' Segment #6 : Line Course: S01°27'24"9 Length: 65.00' North: 176766.7507' East: 1278392.2007' Segment #7 : Line Course: N87°35'31'W Length: 31.50' • North: 176768.0742' East: 1278360.7285' Segment #8 : Line Course: 601°27'24'W Length: 31.97' North: 176736.1146' East: 1278359.9158' Segment #9 : Curve Length: 24.30' Radius: 200.00' Delta: 006°57'36" Tangent: 12.16' Chord: 24.28' Course: SO4°56'12"W Course In: N88°32'36' W Course Out: S81°35'00"E RP North: 176741.1987' East: 1278159.9805' End North: 176711.9246' East: 1278357.8264' Segment #10 : Line Course: S08°25'00"9 Length: 105.72' North: 176607.3432' East: 1278342.3521' Segment #11 : Curve Length: 55.32' Radius: 64.00' Delta: 049°31'35" Tangent: 29.52' Chord: 53.62' Course: 673°39'13'W Course In: S08°25'00"W Course Out: N41°06'35'W RP North: 176544.0325' East: 1278332.9844' End North: 176592.2534' East: 1278290.9042' Segment #12 : Curve Length: 25.96' Radius: 40.00' Delta: 037° 11' 1 T' Tangent 13.46' Chord: 25.51' Course: 667°29'04'W Course In: N41°06'35'W Course Out: S03°55'17"E RP North: 176622.3915' East: 1278264.6041' End North: 176582.4851' East: 1278267.3396' Perimeter 1123.21' Area: 63989 Sq. Ft. Error Closure: 0.0061 Course: S10°58'46"E Error North: -0.00594 East: 0.00115 Precision 1: 184132.79 Name: PARCEL B North: 176607.3490' Segment #1 : Line Course: N08°25'00"E North: 176711.9304' Segment #2 : Curve East: 1278342.3508' Length: 105.72' East: 1278357.8251' Length: 24.30' Radius: 200.00' Delta: 006°5736" Tangent 12.16' Chord: 24.28' Course: N04°56'12"E Course In: N81 °35'00'W Course Out: S88°32'36"E RP North: 176741.2045' East: 1278159.9791' End North: 176736.1204' East: 1278359.9145' Segment #3 : Line Course: N01 °27'24"E Length: 31.97' North: 176768.0800' East: 1278360.7272' Segment #4 : Line Course: 687°35'31"E Length: 31.50' North: 176766.7565' East: 1278392.1994' Segment #5 : Line Course: S87°35'31"E Length: 162.63' North: 176759.9234' East: 1278554.6858' Segment #6 : Line Course: S01°2724'W Length: 379.50' Course: N19°27'24"E Length: 33.78' North: 176380.5461' East: 1278545.0385' North: 176582.4907' East: 1278267.3366' Segment #T : Line Course: N87°35'31"W Length: 152.18' North: 176386.9401' East: 1278392.9929' Segment #8 : Line Course: N01°27'33"E Length: 155.52' North: 176542.4097' East: 1278396.9532' Segment #9 : Curve Length: 92.76' Radius: 64.00' Delta: 083°02'43" Tangent 56.67' Chord: 84.85' Course: N40°03'39"W Course In: N88°32'17' W Course Out: N08°25'00"E RP North: 176544.0425' East: 1278332.9740' End North: 176607.3532' East: 1278342.3417' Perimeter: 1136.07' Area: 66178 3q. Ft. Error Closure: 0.0100 Course: N65°06'21 "W Error North: 0.00419 East: -0.00904 Precision 1:113608.00 *****k******aFtttl LiiLitiii.Li Li4 LLALLL LL******!*********** Name: PARCEL C North: 176386.9353' Segment #1 : Line Course: N87°35'31' W North: 176388.2546' Segment #2 : Line East 1278393.0016' Length: 31.40' East: 1278361.6294' Course: NO2°27'55"E Length: 2.40' North: 176390.6524' East 1278361.7326' Segment #3 : Line Course: N84°49'09'W Length: 141.70' North: 176403.4479' East: 1278220.6115' Segment #4 : Line Course: N87°35'35"W Length: 18.17' North: 176404.2109' East 1278202.4575' Segment #5 : Line Course: N20°06'52"E Length: 155.94' North: 176550.6398' East 1278256.0847' Segment #6 : Line Segment #7 : Curve Length: 25.96' Radius: 40.00' Delta: 037°11'17" Tangent: 13.46' Chord: 25.51' Course: N67°29'04"E Course In: NO3°55'17"W Course Out: S41°06'35"E RP North: 176622.3971' East 1278264.6011' End North: 176592.2590' East 1278290.9012' Segment #8 : Curve Length: 55.32' Radius: 64.00' Delta: 049°31'35" Tangent 29.52' Chord: 53.62' Course: N73°39'13"E Course In: S41°06'35"E Course Out: N08°25'00"E RP North: 176544.0381' East 1278332.9814' End North: 176607.3488' East: 1278342.3492' Segment #9 : Curve Length: 92.76' Radius: 64.00' Delta: 083°02'43" Tangent 56.67' Chord: 84.85' Course: S40°03'39"E Course In: 608°25'00'W Course Out: S88°32'17"E RP North: 176544.0381' East: 1278332.9814' End North: 176542.4053' East: 1278396.9606' Segment #10 : Line Course: 601°27'33"W Length: 155.52' North: 176386.935T East: 1278393.0004' Perimeter. 712.96' Area: 31863 Sq. Ft Error Closure: 0.0013 Course: N74°2721 "W Error North: 0.00035 • East: -0.00126 Precision 1: 548423.08 ******************************************************************** Name: PARCEL D North: 176550.6366' East: 1278256.0852' Segment #1 : Line Course: S20°06'52"W Length: 155.94' North: 176404.2077' East: 1278202.4580' Segment #2 : Line Course: N87°35'35"W Length: 125.26' North: 176409.4682' East: 1278077.3085' Segment #3 : Line Course: N20°06'52"E Length: 184.93' North: 176583.1189' East: 1278140.9053' Segment #4 : Curve Segment #8 : Line Length: 7.74' Radius: 1960.00' Delta: 000°13'35" Tangent 3.87' Chord: 7.74' Course: N20°00'05"E Course In: N69°53'08"W Course Out: S70°06'43"E RP North: 177257.1559' East: 1276300.4504' End North: 176590.3962' East: 1278143.5542' Segment #5 : Line Course: S02°24'25"W Length: 8.39' North: 176315.1301' East 1278216.8926' Segment #9 : Line Course: S88°52'26"E Length: 164.98' North: 176311.8877' East: 1278381.8408' Course: S70°32'36"E Length: 119.35' Segment #10 : Line North: 176550.6415' East 1278256.0886' Perimeter. 593.22' Area: 20799 Sq. Ft Error Closure: 0.0059 Course: N34°13'09"E Error North: 0.00490 East: 0.00333 Precision 1:100545.76 **********************ALAR{t**************************************#* **** Name: PARCEL E Course: 601°06'33"W Length: 280.19' North: 176031.7502' East 1278376.4170' Segment #11 : Line Course: N87°39'54"W Length: 97.12' North: 176035.7071' East 1278279.3777' Segment #12 : Line North: 176028.1704' East: 1278181.9111' Course: 601°06'50"W Length: 11.50' North: 176024.2092' East 1278279.1541' Segment #1 : Line Course: N01 °07'07"E Length: 125.03' Segment #13 : Line North: 176153.1766' East: 1278184.3520' Segment #2 : Line Course: N87°39'54' W Length: 198.12' North: 176161.2485' East: 1277986.3965' Course: N87°39'54"W Length: 97.33' North: 176028.1747' East: 1278181.9049' Perimeter. 1332.79' Area: 84.310 Sq. Ft. Error Closure: 0.0075 Course: N55°42'15"W Error North: 0.00424 East: -0.00621 Segment #3 : Line Precision 1: 177705.33 Course: N20°06'52"E Length: 160.87' North: 176312.3066' East: 1278041.7191' Segment #4 : Line Course: S69°53'08"E Length: 5.00' North: 176310.5871' East: 1278046.4142' Segment #5 : Line Course: N20°06'52"E Length: 20.00' North: 176329.3673' East: 1278053.2921' Segment #6 : Line Course: N69°55'50"E Length: 2.71' North: 176330.2972' East: 1278055.8375' Segment #7 : Line Course: S87°35'35"E Length: 161.55' North: 176323.5127' East: 1278217.2450' 4 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of CommunDevelopm 12 2013 SEPA ity 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9888 E c VIRONMENTAL Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-36��Lot �Mt - - E-mail.: plannine(a,TukwilaWA.gov 1) REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: File Number: 6 / 3 .... 0/ Application Complete Date: Project File Number:"- Application Incomplete Date: /7_ Other File Numbers:/ J NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Tukwila Village LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. See attached Legal Description for lots, blocks, and subdivisions. The access streets are Tukwila International Boulevard and South 144th Street. The nearest intersection is Tukwila International Boulevard and South 144th Street. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). See attached list of all tax lot numbers. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Bryan M. Park Address: 201 - 27th Avenue SE, Building A, Suite 300, Puyallup, WA 98374 Phone: (253) 231-5001 FAX: (253) 231-5010 E-mail: bryanp@housing4seniors.com Signature: , ' U `vim— Date: 05/28/2013 H:\Land Use Applications In PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc } Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: .1 9. Vicinity Map with site location. ✓ 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. ✓ 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". H:V.and Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc THE SAMARA APARTMENTS NORMANDY COURT APARTMENTS PROP ERTYtINE BUILDING B L L. RIVERTON TERRACE LEGEND: PHASE 1 OVERALL SITE • BUILDING C (THE COMMONS) • PLAZA • BUILDING A (LIBRARY BY OTHERS) PHASE 2 • BUILDINGS D & E PHASE 3 • BUILDING B PHASE BOUNDARY, TYP. UPPER FLOOR OUTLINE, TYP. G PROPERTY LINE R. Easter -RI/, MLA STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED M) M r RAiE uoaaaEASTER CERrI Issue Dates 0 9/ Date Des. 05/28/13 MR 50881114t BLDG C BUILDING E BUILDING A PHASE 2 ri PHASE 1yw T Uawl INTERN-��_ AT/ONAt -----,,. :a -• z:•-,_, - -- - -/T2(i7L- NOTE: SEE CS SHEET FOR PROJECT STATISTICS BREAKDOWN BY PROJECT PHASE Cr ROI, I NZ GREAT BEAR MOTOR INN 11 PHASED DEVELOPMENT PLAN o 15 30 60 90 E03 c=00/ TUKWILA VILLAGE F 55 RECEIVED JUN 12 2013 • cot/m.1N! I Y DEVL .O1AMENT ti H gQ a < O PROJECT tk LA -1113 FILE NAME: LAD 13 - PI.1 DRAWN BY: CP/LP/MB PHASED DEVELOPMENT PLAN P1.1 BAR SUBMITTAL