Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2021-07-19 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETTukwila City Council Agenda REGULAR MEETING •❖ 44-W 1 LA wQs Q 4 "',n 2 190$ Allan Ekberg, Mayor Counci/members: ❖ Verna Seal ❖ Kathy Hougardy David Cline, City Administrator ❖ De'Sean Quinn ❖ Thomas McLeod Kate Kruller, Council President ❖ Zak Idan ❖ Cynthia Delostrinos Johnson THE MEETING WILL 20-28 ADOPTED ANY PUBLIC AGENCY, RCW 42.30 UNLESS NOT BE CONDUCTED AT TUKWILA CITY HALL, BASED ON THE GOVERNOR'S PROCLAMATION 2020 WHICH SAYS IN PART: TO RCW 42.30, IS PROHIBITED FROM CONDUCTING ANY MEETING, SUBJECT TO MARCH 24, SUBJECT (A) THE MEETING IS NOT CONDUCTED IN-PERSON AND INSTEAD PROVIDES AN OPTIONS) FOR THE PUBLIC TO ATTEND THE THE PHONE For Technical Monday, July 19, 2021; 7:00 PROCEEDINGS THROUGH, AT MINIMUM, TELEPHONIC ACCESS, ..." NUMBER FOR THE PUBLIC TO LISTEN TO THE MEETING IS: 1-253-292-9750, ACCESS CODE: 670077847#. Click here to: Join Microsoft Teams Meeting Support during the meeting call: 1-206-433-7155 PM • Ord #2655 • Res #2027 1. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE / ROLL CALL 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The City of Tukwila is located on the ancestral lands of the Coast Sal/sh people. We acknowledge their continuing connections to land, waters and culture. We pay our respects to their elders past, present and emerging. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS— including comment on items both on and not on the meeting agenda * 2021 update * Those wishing to provide public comments now have the opportunity to verbally address the City Council via phone or Microsoft Teams for up to 5 minutes for items both on and not on the meeting agenda. To take advantage of this option, please email citycouncil@tukwilawa.gov with your name and the topic you wish to speak on by 5:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Please clearly indicate that your message is for public comment during the meeting. You will receive further instructions and be called upon during the meeting to address the City Council. 4. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Minutes: 7/12/21 (Special Mtg.) b. Approval of Vouchers c. Authorize the Mayor to sign a Letter of Understanding with Waste Management of Washington to renew a recyclable market surcharge in conjunction with contract #12-027. [Reviewed and forwarded to Consent by the Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee on 7/12/21.] Pg.1 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Weekly COVID-19 report. b. An update on the BNSF Alternative Access Study Environmental Impact Statement process. Pg.15 Pg.27 (continued...) REGULAR MEETING July 19, 2021 Page 2 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. REPORTS a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff — City Administrator Report Pg.115 8. MISCELLANEOUS 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION 10. ADJOURNMENT This agenda is available Remote Tukwila Council at www.tukwilawa.gov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. meetings are audio taped (and video taped as of 9/14/20). Available at www.tukwilawa.gov) WELCOME TO THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Tukwila City Council encourages community participation in the local government process and welcomes attendance and public comment at its meetings. MEETING SCHEDULE Regular Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month. The City Council takes formal action in the form of motions, resolutions and ordinances at Regular Meetings. Committee of the Whole Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month. The City Council considers current issues, discusses policy matters in detail, and coordinates the work of the Council at Committee of the Whole meetings. PUBLIC COMMENTS Members of the public are given the opportunity to address the Council for up to 5 minutes on items both on and not on the meeting agenda during Public Comments. The City Council will also accept comments on an agenda item when the item is presented in the agenda, but speakers are limited to commenting once per item each meeting. When recognized by the Presiding Officer, please go to the podium if on-site or turn on your microphone if attending virtually and state your name dearly for the record. The City Council appreciates hearing from you but may not respond or answer questions during the meeting. Members of the City Council or City staff may follow up with you following the meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. The City Council Rules of Procedure provide the following guidelines for Public Hearings: 1. City staff will provide a report summarizing and providing context to the issue at hand. 2. The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 3. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 4. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. 5. After the proponents and opponents have used their speaking time, the Council may ask further clarifying questions of the speakers. 6. Members of the public who wish to address the Council on the hearing topic may speak for 5 minutes each. 7. Speakers are asked to sign in on forms provided by the City Clerk. 8. The Council may ask clarifying questions of speakers and the speakers may respond. 9. Speakers should address their comments to the City Council. 10. If a large number of people wish to speak to the issue, the Council may limit the total amount of comment time dedicated to the Public Hearing. 11. Once the Presiding Officer closes the public hearing, no further comments will be accepted, and the issue is open for Councilmember discussion. 12. Any hearing being held or ordered to be held by the City Council may be continued in the manner as set forth by RCW 42.30.100. For more information about the City Council, including its complete Rules of Procedure, please visit: https://www.tukwilawa.gov/departments/city-council/ COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review 07/19/21 JR ITEM INFORMATION ITEM NO. 4.C. 1 STAFF SPONSOR: HARI PONNEKANTI ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 07/19/21 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Renewal of Recyclable Market Surcharge CATEGORY ❑ Discussion Mtg Date Motion Date 07/19/21 ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance M Date ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑ Other Mtg Date Mtg SPONSOR ❑Council Mayor HR DCD ❑Finance Fire TS P&R ❑Police 11 PW ❑Court SPONSOR'S Waste Management (WM) has submitted a request to extend the 5% recycling surcharge to SUMMARY October 31, 2023. On July 15, 2019, City Council approved a two-year 5% Commercial Recyclable Cost surcharge, which went into effect on November 1, 2019. Parties agreed it could be extended by Council upon written request and clear justification from WM. The proposed recycling surcharge only applies to commercial users, not residential. Council is being asked to consider this item on the Consent Agenda. REVIEWED BY Trans&Infrastructure ❑ CommunitySvs/Safety ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Planning/Economic Dev. ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. COMMITTEE CHAIR: VERNA SEAL ❑ LTAC DATE: 07/12/21 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. COMMITTEE Public Works Department Unanimous Approval; Forward to Regular Consent Agenda COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 07/19/21 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 07/19/21 Informational Memorandum dated 07/09/21, revised after 07/12/21 T&I Letter of Understanding Letter from WM requesting the 5% Surcharge for the next 2 years Financial Analysis of 5% Surcharge Extension Current Municipal Contract Rates Minutes from Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Meeting of 07/12/2021 1 2 TO: FROM: CC: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Department - Hurl Ponnekrznti, Director/City Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer Mayor Allan Ekberg July 9, 2021 (Revised after July 12, 2021 T&I) Renewal of Recyclable Market Surcharge Contract No. 12-027 ISSUE Waste Management (WM) is the solid waste and recycling provider in the city of Tukwila. WM requests that the city renew the 5% Commercial Recycling surcharge for two more years - beginning November 1, 2021 and ending October 31, 2023. BACKGROUND: Recycling Costs Waste Management (WM) presented to the Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee in May 2019 regarding changes in the global recycling market resulting in increased costs. To offset the additional costs associated with recycling, WM initially requested an increase to the recycling rates. On July 15, 2019, City Council approved two-year 5% Commercial Recyclable Cost surcharge, which went into effect on November 1, 2019. The surcharge was approved to be in place for two years, beginning November 1, 2019, and the parties agreed it could be extended by Council upon written request and clear justification from WM. DISCUSSION: Renewal of the Recycling Surcharge due to continued Recycling Costs WM has submitted the request for extending this 5% recycling surcharge for the rest of their contract, which is set to expire October 2023, due to continued operational costs in the global recycling market. Please see attached information to this extent. FINANCIAL IMPACT The proposed recycling surcharge only applies to commercial users, not residential. WM updated municipal rate comparisons between Tukwila and neighboring cities on June 24, 2021, which highlights the dates each city contract was signed and differentiation of costs by service type. Even with the proposed increases, the solid waste and recycling rates remains below Tukwila's neighboring cities. The proposed surcharge would be in place for two more years, beginning November 1, 2021, and ending October 31, 2023. RECOMMEDATION Staff reviewed the material submitted by WM about the operational costs in the global recycling market. Staff agrees that this information is similar to the information submitted in May of 2019, when the Council approved the 5% Commercial Recyclable Cost surcharge to offset WM's costs associated with the weakening recycling market. Council is being asked to consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the July 19, 2021 Regular Council Meeting. Attachments: Letter of Understanding Letter from WM requesting the 5% surcharge for the next 2 years Financial Analysis of 5% Surcharge Extension Current Municipal Contract Rates (Updated 6/24/21) Tukwila City Hall • szoaSnuthceraterBoulevard . Tukwila, WA 98.188 • 206-433-M00 • Website: TukwiliWAgav 3 4 July 12, 2021 Laura Moser Public Sector Manager Waste Management of Washington, Inc. 720 4th Avenue, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Letter of Understanding: Extension of Recyclable Market Surcharge - Comprehensive Garbage, Recyclables and Compostables Collection Agreement dated March 13, 2012, as amended Dear Ms. Moser, The purpose of this Letter of Understanding ("LOU") is to extend the recyclable market surcharge between the City of Tukwila ("City") and Waste Management of Washington, Inc. ("WM"). The City and WM executed Agreement No. 12-027, Comprehensive Garbage, Recyclables and Compostable Collection Agreement dated February 21, 2012 ("Agreement"). Pursuant to Letter of Understanding between the Parties dated June 4, 2019 and signed July 23, 2019, City and WM agreed to increase commercial rates by five percent (5%), effective November 1, 2019, to reflect increased costs in recyclables processing and marketing. This surcharge was only approved for a period of two years; however, WM was permitted to seek an extension of the surcharge for an additional two years by providing justification of the need to the City. WM has submitted a written request for an extension of the surcharge, and justification of the need to continue the surcharge. The purpose of this LOU is to confirm the City's approval of WM's request for extension of the surcharge for an additional two years, starting on November 1, 2021, ending on October 31, 2023. Page 1 of 2 5 By signing below, the City and Waste Management acknowledge their approval and acceptance of the terms of this LOU and acknowledges that this LOU: (a) creates a legally binding obligation upon the parties, (b) shall be governed and constructed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington regardless of any conflict of law provisions, (c) sets forth the entire agreement between the City and WM with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, understandings and agreements with respect to the subject matter hereof, and (d) may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Signatures transmitted electronically shall be deemed valid execution of this LOU and binding on the parties. Acknowledged and agreed upon by: CITY OF TUKWILA: By: Printed Name: Title: WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WASHINGTON, INC: By: Printed Name: -N Title: Date Signed: Date Signed: Page 2 of 2 6 June 11, 2021 Mr. Hari Ponnekanti Public Works Director City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Sent via email only to: Hari.Ponnekanti@tukwilawa.gov RE: Recyclable Market Surcharge expiring October 31, 2021 Dear Mr. Ponnekanti, WASTE MANAGEMENT 720 41h Ave, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 The purpose of this letter is to request another 2 -year term for the Recyclable Market Surcharge set to expire 10/31/21. We understand the request must be made no later than 90 days prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by documentation justifying the request. Since November 1, 2019 when the increase became effective, we have continued to see fluctuating commodity markets and increased processing costs. Over the past 18 months (October 2019 through April 2021) our processing costs have increased to $136.46 per ton and commodity values have gone up and down with an average $26.60 per ton. Based on the commercial and multifamily tons WM collects, processes, markets for City of Tukwila customers our costs have increased 6.9% over this time frame. Attached is documentation showing the data for the basis of our request and justification. Therefore, we are asking that the current 5% recycle surcharge remain in place for another two-year period (11/1/2021 through 10/31/2023). Even though realistically, this does not cover our costs and is applied to the collection portion only and not the total rate for commercial and multifamily. WM appreciates your consideration of our request and looks forward to your response. As always, I am available to answer any questions you may have. Sincerely, Laura Moser Public Sector Manager (206) 391-9112 Lmoser@wm.com Attachments: 1). Financial Analysis for extension of 5 percent surcharge_061121_City Copy 2). Current Municipal Contract Rates_City Copy 7 8 Tukwila Recycling Tonnage and Revenue Tons Tons Tons Average Col E multiply Col D Commercial MF Total Value Revenue Oct, '19 372.4 46.3 418.7 $ 10.46 $ 4,380 Nov 325.5 44.2 369.7 $ 13.13 $ 4,854 Dec 343.0 52.5 395.5 $ 4.82 $ 1,906 Jan 384.4 52.3 436.7 $ 10.41 $ 4,546 Feb 322.6 40.5 363.1 $ 11.09 $ 4,027 Mar 317.0 39.1 356.1 $ 5.07 $ 1,805 Apr 259.7 35.0 294.7 $ 7.09 $ 2,089 May 264.5 36.0 300.5 $ 13.53 $ 4,066 Jun 300.8 41.1 341.9 $ 10.99 $ 3,757 Jul 317.1 39.0 356.1 $ 10.54 $ 3,753 Aug 298.4 38.7 337.1 $ 18.64 $ 6,284 Sep 326.5 43.4 369.9 $ 25.42 $ 9,403 Oct. '20 331.2 45.8 377.0 $ 35.53 $ 13,395 Nov 350.0 49.7 399.7 $ 42.32 $ 16,915 Dec 363.1 52.0 415.1 $ 50.00 $ 20,755 Jan 373.2 53.2 426.4 $ 47.62 $ 20,305 Feb 300.5 44.8 345.3 $ 51.27 $ 17,704 Mar 368.8 52.0 420.8 $ 54.24 $ 22,824 Apr 361.4 47.0 408.4 $ 66.07 $ 26,983 Total 6,280.1 852.6 7,132.7 $ 26.60 $ 189,752 Commodity Value Q1 2018 Commodity Revenue Lost since LOU signed Increase in Processing Fees since LOU signed Total Total 2020 Com'I/MF Billed Revenue 7,132.7 $ 47.92 $ 341,799 (+E27*D27) $ 152,047 (F25 -F27) $ 141,370 See Tab 'Processing Cost Increase' Cell E16 $ 293,417 (F31+F29) $ 4,226,753 Combined % increase in processing cost and revenue lost 6.9% CO China Sword Impact - Multifamily & Commercial Municipality: Tukwila WM MRF Used: JMK 1. Increased MRF Processing Costs Explanatory Notes a Previous WUTC Processing Cost per Ton $ 116.64 Per May 2018 WUTC tariff forJMK b Current WUTC Processing Cost per Ton $ 136.46 Per Seattle/SS2021 rate case c Increased Cost per Ton $ 19.82 [b -a] d Annual Multifamily & Commercial Recycling Tons 7,133 2020 actual multifamily & commercial recycling tons e Total Increased Processing Cost - MF & CM $ 141,370 [cxd] Current Munic pal Contract Rates - Residential Tukwila WM (11/1/2012 contract started) Burien Recology (6/1/2014 contract started) Des Moines Recology (11/1/2011 contract started) Newcastle WM (3/1/2019 contract started) Renton Republic (11/1/2016 contract started) SeaTac Recology (10/1/2013 contract started) Federal Way WM (9/1/2020 contract started) Tukwila vs. Burien higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Des Moines higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Newcastle higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Renton higher/lower) Tukwila vs. SeaTac higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Federal Way higher/(lower) 20 -gallon $8.92 $19.04 $17.51 $31.78 $14.31 $16.49 $16.35 -53% -49% -72% -38% -46% -45% 35 -gallon $13.10 $25.98 $23.05 $38.78 $23.58 $21.23 $21.46 -50% -43% -66% -44% -38% -39% 64 -gallon $20.68 $36.70 $34.42 $48.20 $41.28 $28.96 $31.39 -44% -40% -57% -50% -29% -34% 96 -gallon $28.28 $47.36 $45.75 $60.18 $60.95 $41.08 $46.26 -40% -38% -53% -54% -31% -39% Current Municipal Contract Rates - Commercial Tukwila WM (11/1/2012 contract started) Burien Recology (6/1/2014 contract started) Des Moines Recology (11/1/2011 contract started) Newcastle WM (3/1/2019 contract started) Renton Republic (11/1/2016 contract started) SeaTac Recology (10/1/2013 contract started) Federal Way WM (9/1/2020 contract started) Tukwila vs. Burien higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Des Moines higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. New Castle higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Renton higher /(lower) Tukwila vs. SeaTac higher/(lower) Tukwila vs. Federal Way higher/ (lower) 1 Yard Weekly $73.27 $95.91 $109.60 $124.59 $113.98 $110.34 $117.37 -24% -33% -41% -36% -34% -38% 1.5 Yard Weekly $102.24 $138.84 $159.83 $171.13 $156.24 $148.32 $157.26 -26% -36% -40% -35% -31% -35% 2 Yards Weekly $125.72 $178.41 $207.03 $215.24 $196.97 $190.75 $197.27 -30% -39% -42% -36% -34% -36% 3 Yards Weekly $179.84 $257.57 $301.44 $316.37 $280.25 $272.80 $277.83 -30% -40% -43% -36% -34% -35% 4 Yards Weekly $234.24 $316.59 $389.78 $388.06 $363.40 $355.01 $350.32 -26% -40% -40% -36% -34% -33% 6 Yards Weekly $331.40 $454.79 $566.45 $536.32 $527.26 $507.01 $500.51 -27% -41% -38% -37% -35% -34% 8 Yards Weekly $434.03 $579.54 $730.97 $673.57 $690.15 $665.35 $632.80 -25% -41% -36% -37% -35% -31% 12 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee Minutes July 12, 2021 D. 2021 Overlay Program - 53rd Avenue South Roadway Widening Staff provided an update on the 53rd Avenue South traffic revision and sidewalk plan, including wideningthe road to accommodate two-way travel. Committee Recommendation Discussion only. E. Recyclable Market Surcharge Renewal Staff is seeking Council approval to renew Waste Management's 5% Commercial Recycling *surcharge through October 31, 2023 due to continued operational costs in the global recycling market. Item(s) for follow-up: Verify tonnage and revenue chart numbers. Committee Recommendation Unanimous approval. Forward to July 19, 2021 Regular Consent Agenda. 11. Miscellaneous The meeting adjourned at 6:34 p.m. , Committee Chair Approval Minutes by LH 13 14 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Meeting Date Prepared by Mayors review Council review 07/19/21 RB ITEM INFORMATION ITEM No. 5.A. 15 STAFF SPONSOR: RACHEL BIANCHI ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 07/19/21 AGENDA ITEM TITLE A weekly update on the City's planning and response to COVID-19 (Coronavirus) CATEGORY 11 Discussion 07/19121 ❑ Motion Mtg Date ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mtg Date ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑ Other Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR n Council 11 Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ TS ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ Pr SPONSOR'S The City is actively engaged in regional efforts to address the coronavirus (COVID-19). SUMMARY Staff are providing the Council with updated information regarding the City's response to COVID-19. REVIEWED BY ❑ Trans&Infrastructure ❑ CommunitySvs/Safety ❑ Finance Com ❑ Planning/Economic Dev. ❑ LTAC ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: N/A COMMITTEE CHAIR: RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. COMMITTEE N/A N/A COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $ $ Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 07/19/21 Coronavirus Report 15 16 CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE UPDATE July 19, 2021 * Denotes All New Content in the Section ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND CITY OPERATIONS Essential Services & City Operations The City has begun transitioning back to in-person services, with the goal of full services by September 13, 2021. City Hall is currently open Mondays and Wednesdays from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. The City Permit Center will be open Monday through Thursday from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Human Services is open for in- person services Tuesday and Thursdays from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. All services remain available remotely. Visitors to City facilities are required to wear masks. Employees that have filled out the vaccine attestation form are not required to wear a mask; staff that have not filled out the form are required to wear a mask at City facilities unless they are alone in a room with a closed door. Financial Sustainability On Monday, May 17, 2021, the Council provided initial direction on how to spend much of the FYI 2021 Streamlined Sales Tax funds. Finance and Governance Committee began to take up how to spend the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds at the June 14, 2021 meeting. Staff doesn't expect the final rules to be determined on how to spend ARPA funds until mid to late July, and will return to Committee with more information at that time. The full Council will ultimately make the decision on how to spend those funds. * Human Services Summary: Staff has assisted five households (12 individuals) with $9,600 in back owing rent and utilities. Currently, staff has four households in various stages of the intake process. The lowest request for back owing rent this week was $1,100 and the highest was $4,125. Residents and landlords who applied for the EPRAP program can check their status by going to: https://kingcounty.gov/depts/community-human-services/COVID/eviction-prevention-rent-assistance LIHEAP (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program) has additional heat funds to assist residents who have PSE energy arrearages up to $2,500. Resident must have already received LIHEAP funds this year to qualify for the additional funds. Staff continues to refer residents with PSE arrearages to utilize this program first, as well as Seattle City Light's Utility Discount Program. Source General Fund Contracted Partners Covid Rental & Utility Assistance Sewer/Water HB 1406 Rental Assistance Information from the community on total past due rent amount Households Assisted/Ind 0/0 4/10 0/0 1/2 Funding Breakdown Rent: $ Utility: $ Rent: $ 6000.00 Utility: $ 2400.00 (City water/sewer=$1300) $ $1200.00 $500-$1,200 = 4 $1,250-$3,500 = 5 $3,600-$4,000 = 2 Over $4,000 = 1 17 At the July 12, 2021 Council meeting, Councilmembers asked to see the breakdown of human services funds budgeted and spent so far this year. Note - the extra labor position was not filled until March of this year, meaning there has only been one quarter of disbursement of the extra COVID rent/utility assistance funds. Staff expects to spend all of these funds by the end of the year. Additionally, there is not a budget for the 1406 funds, as it is sales tax dependent, but these funds roll over from year to year. (Reminder, at the beginning of the pandemic the Council authorized 90% of the 1406 funds go to rental assistance on a temporary basis, with 10% going to SKHHP). The table below reflects spending from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021. So far in 2021, the City has assisted 109 households (284 individuals) with rental and utility assistance. Funding Source Budget Spent Non -profits City Water H B 1406 COVID Total $51,000.00 $24,037.00 $6,000.00 $2,354.00 $90,209.00 $45,359.00 $166,000.00 $48,431.00 Remaining $26,963.00 $3,646.00 $44,850.00 $117,569.00 $313,209.00 $120,181.00 $193,028.00 Fire Staffing and CaIIs for Service There have been no changes to Fire staffing since the last report. Police Staffing and CaIIs for Service There have been no changes to Fire staffing since the last report. *Business Recovery Business Re -Openings and Closings Washington's economy is now fully reopened. Nearly all businesses and public spaces including restaurants, stores, offices, theaters, outdoor events, and other places can return to full capacity with no physical distancing requirements. Some mask requirements have also been lifted which will especially help certain businesses such as restaurants and bars. Under the new requirements, fully vaccinated people are no longer required to wear masks in many places such as stores and restaurants. Partially or unvaccinated people are still required to wear masks in most settings such as indoor public spaces and crowded outdoor spaces. And everyone is still required to wear masks in certain settings such as riding public transportation, medical facilities, etc. Businesses can require all customers and employees to wear masks or verify vaccination. Business Assistance Application periods for some government funding programs have now closed such as the federal government's $800 billion Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and $28.6 billion Restaurant Revitalization Fund and the State's most recent $240 million round of the Working Washington small business grant program. 18 There are a number of government funding programs still accepting applications including the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program. The State recently launched the Small Business Flex Fund which offers low interest loans to small businesses. We anticipate that later this year the State will implement a $50 million fifth round of the Working Washington small business grant program. The State is also significantly limiting increases in unemployment insurance costs for businesses. King County is distributing $145 million of federal funds for residential rental assistance and eviction prevention to tenants and landlords through their Eviction Prevention and Rental Assistance Program (EPRAP). Staff sent an email to all businesses with information on the two low interest loan programs and federal tax credits related to the pandemic. Unemployment The unemployment claims data report will be included monthly and is included in the Council packet for this meeting. On March 11, 2021, the President signed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act. The new law extends Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC), which is for workers who have exhausted all other benefits, plus the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), which benefits people who do not qualify for regular unemployment such as self-employed people and independent contractor, for an additional 29 weeks. It also extends the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC) which provides an extra $300 per week for eligible claimants who are receiving benefits from any unemployment program through September 6, 2021. In 2020 the State rescinded the regular requirement for people receiving unemployment benefits to seek employment. Those requirements restarted in early July. MEETING THE COMMUNITY'S BASIC NEEDS * Food Resources and Distribution Park n' Play, numbers reflect week of July 5. The Summer Park n' Play program started on July 6. Meals, recreation kits, and resources will be distributed on Tuesdays and Thursdays at Cascade View Park, Crestview Park, & TCC Senior Meals, number of meals distributed. Week of 7/12. Tukwila Pantry Attendance Meals Snack Items Rec Kits Masks 196 566 306 94 5 Duwamish Curb Cafe 25 Meals on Wheels 180 07/08/21 337 07/10/21 229 07/13/21 299 19 COVID-19 UPDATES * Covid-19 Tukwila Overview L.41 King County Public Health - Seattle & King County COVID-19 Outbreak Summary Update date 7/15/2021 8:11 AM Click on the icons to explore this dashboard: Overview Demographics Geography Geography over time Select city to compare: Count New since yesterday Wrwila Summary of counts for Tukwila Overall Percent Rate per 100,000 Compared to King residents County rate Past 14 days Count Percent Positives 2,030 1 6.8% of all tests 10,051.5 Confirmed 1,978 1 9,794.0 Probable 52 0 257.5 Hospitalizations 103 0 5.1% of all positive cases 510.0 Deaths due to 18 0 0.9% of all positive cases 89.1 COVID-19 illness All PCR test results 29,013 ! 143,657.2 People tested by 11 503 • 56,956.8 PCR Legend: Lower than overall King County rate • Similar to overall King County rate 11.00 9.0 2.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 561.0 . 9.0 . Higher than overall King County rate Mobile Vaccination Team The Tukwila Fire Department deployed its Mobile Vaccine Team (MVT) to provide COVID-19 vaccines and is focused on home bound and regional opportunities. * Vaccine Update & Locations There are many ways for community members to access the vaccine at no cost. Multiple appointments are available at publicly run mass vaccination sites in the area, as well as private opportunities. As of this writing, all locations below have open appointments; additional locations can be found at: vaccinelocator.doh.wa.qov • Walgreens - 3716 S. 144th Tukwila. walgreens.com/findcare/vaccination/covid-19 • Target - 301 Strander Boulevard. cvs.com/vaccine/intake/store/covid-screener/covid-qns • Auburn - 1 101 Supermall Way - appointment required. KingCounty.gov/COVID/Registration • Kent - Showare Center - appointment required. KingCounty.gov/COVID/Registration • City of Seattle - Rainier Beach Boat Launch - subscribe to list to learn for open appointments at Seattle.gov/Mayor/Covid-19/vaccinations or call 206-684-2489 (interpretation available) • SeaMar - Burien, Seattle and White Center locations. seamar.org/covid-vaccine • Kaiser Permanente - 2715 Naches Avenue, Renton (membership not required) 20 Vaccinations in King County as of July 15, 2021: • 1 dose: 1,555,066 or 80.6% • 2 does: 1,439,294 or 74.8% Below is a zip code map of vaccinations as of July 15, 2021 (percentage of population 12+ with at least one dose) in King County, with Tukwila's two zip codes highlighted: • 98168: 75.2% • 98188: 77.7% Map of KC residents who have at least one dose among ages 12+ years old © 2021 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap 0% 100% Table of all KC residents who have at least one dose by age group and regions Below is a chart of vaccinations by region in King County. Note vaccination rate than many other areas in the county. Table of all KC residents who have at least one dose by Overall King County East North Seattle South Kirkland, Redmond, Bothell, and Woodinville N Seattle and Shoreline Central Seattle W Seattle, S Seattle, Delridge and Highline 10 Burien, Renton, Tukwila and Seatac Auburn, Kent, and Federal Way South East King County Bellevue, Issaquah and Mercer Island East King County Vashon Island 4 Regions Regions 12+ years 12-19 years 20-29 years 30-39 years old old old old 79.6% 63.7% 66.9% 75% that South King County has a lower age group and regions 40-49 years 50-59 years 60-69 years 70-79 years old old old old 833% 87.2% 91.2% >95% 80+ years old >95% 89.4% 852% 811% 70.8% 88.5 % 683% 66.6% 44.7% 81% 72.8% 69.8% 559% 80.7% 89.4% 86.2% 64.9% 943% 91.2% 88.4% 70.2% 93.6% 79.4% 85.2% 80.6% 89.9% 93.1% 81.2% >95% >95% >95% >95% >95% >95% 88.2% 82.8% >95% 88% 81.6% 805% 84.5% 75A% 67.2% 69.7% 89.9% 89.9% 92.1% 80.7% 67.1% 64.9% 68.2% 523% 38.7% 443% 87.9% 91.9% 79% 71.7% 66.4% 74.5% 68.7% 57.2% 51.8% 60.6% 86.7% 865% >95% 88% 84.2% 90.4% 85.7% 70.1% 60.7% 63.2% 853% 67.6% 943% >95% 93.4% 81.6% 92% 81.2% 66.7% 63% 92.6% 90.6% 78.9% 88% 83.0% 81.1% 91.1% 85.7% 80.8% 74.7% >95% 92.9% 71% 88.2% 88.9% 70.1% 90.7% >95% >95 % 943% 86% >95% 92.1% >95% >95% 91.7% >95% 91.1% 92% >95% 85.0% >95% >95% >95% 82.6% 84.8% 77.9% >95% >95% >95% >95% >95% >95% 21 * COVID-19 Testing The following are the number of individuals tested over the past week at the Church by the Side of the Road. This is a regional testing facility drawing individuals from across south King County. All testing locations in the region are seeing a significant surge in the number of people requesting tests. King County has contracted with off-duty officers to provide traffic management along Tukwila International Boulevard and Military Road to mitigate traffic impacts in the neighborhood. 7/14 - 139 individuals tested 7/13 - 164 individuals tested 7/12 - 167 individuals tested 7/11 - closed 7/10 - 165 individuals tested 7/9 - 181 individuals tested 7/8 - 173 individuals tested 22 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator DATE: July 14, 2021 SUBJECT: Unemployment Insurance Report through May 2021 The attached graphs show the number of workers receiving unemployment insurance for zip codes 98168 and 98188 for the week ending May 30, 2021. The charts reflect three types of unemployment insurance claims: Regular, Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), and Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC). As you can see from the graphs, the number of workers receiving unemployment insurance has improved significantly from the peak in May 2020. This reflects that many people returned to work as businesses reopened and customers returned. After the initial reopening, employment has continued to slowly improve; however, in certain areas the number of people who are unemployed remains very high. At the end of May, 10.0% of the workforce in 98168 and 13.9% of the workforce in 98188 received unemployment compensation. Those improved from the end of April. Because the additional $300 per week in unemployment compensation provided by the federal government will end in early September, we anticipate people who are currently unemployed will start returning to work, even if it means accepting lower wage positions. The unemployment in our zip codes is still higher than for King County. For the same time period for all of King County, 5.5% of the workforce received unemployment compensation. The higher rates of workers receiving unemployment compensation in these two zip codes as compared to King County is due to differences between the types of jobs and industries. Workers in these two zip codes are more likely to work in jobs that cannot work remotely and in industries that have been most affected by the pandemic such as entertainment, hospitality, retail, restaurants, and transportation. Notes: (1) Unemployment insurance claims data is not available for the specific boundaries of the City of Tukwila. The attached charts represent two zip codes, which include parts of Tukwila, SeaTac, and possibly parts of unincorporated King County. (2) Regular unemployment is the standard program for unemployed workers. Eligible unemployed workers may receive regular unemployment for up to 26 weeks. (3) Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) is a program for self-employed people, independent contractors, and part-time workers (with fewer than 680 hours). (4) Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC) is an extension of regular unemployment benefits. (5) Data is from https://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/health/covid- 19/data/impacts/unemployment.aspx. 23 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 (6) The percent of workers receiving unemployment insurance compensation is related but not the same as the "unemployment rate". Official unemployment rates are not available for cities under 25,000 in population. Currently, unemployment rates likely understate the actual percent of workers who are receiving unemployment compensation. ZIP Code 98168 Percent of adults age 16-64 receiving unemployment benefits from 5/24/2020-5/30/2020 Continued claims per capita {46) C 30 10.0% E T O 15.096 0 v 10096 0 v m 5.096 0 0096 24 Click on the map to view claims for each ZIP code in chart below Percent of workers receiving unemployment in 98168 by week View: Number of Workers Receiving UI Percent of Workers Receiving UI New Claims Filed This Week Use slider or arrows to change week shown on map: 5/24/2020-5/30/2020 Show history Highlight ZIP code: No' items highlighted *Estimated bythetotal number of new UI claims per 100 people 0005 16-64 - U1= Unemployment Insurance; - PUA = Pandemic Unemployment Assistance; - PEUC = Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Claims; - EB = Extended Benefits. See Notes tab for details. 10.0% 4/1/20 5/120 6/120 7/1/20 0/120 9/1/20 10/1/20 111/20 12/1/20 1f1/21 2/121 3/1/21 4/1/21 5/1/21 6/1/21 7/1/21 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 ZIP Code 98188 Percent of adults age 16-64 receiving unemployment benefits from 5/24/2020-5/30/2020 Continued claims per capita (96) U 3n 25.0% E E T 20.0% E 15.0% 10.045 5.045 0.099 Chck on the map to view claims for each ZIP code in chart below Percent of workers receiving unemployment in 98188 by week View: Numberof Workers Receiving UI Percent of Workers Receiving UI New Claims Filed This Week Use slider or arrows to change week shown on map: 5/24/2020-5/30/2020 Show history Highlight ZIP code: No items highlighted *Estimated by the -total numberof new UI claims per iOS people ages 16-64 - UI = Unemployment Insurance; - PUA = Pandemic Unemployment Assistance; - PEUC =Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Claims; - EB = Extended Benefits_ See Notes tabfor details. 13_9% 4/1/20 5/1/20 6/1/20 7/1/20 5/1/20 911/20 10/1/20 11/1/20 12/1/20 1/1/21 2/1/21 3/1/21 4/1/21 5/1/21 6/1/21 7/1/21 25 26 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 4 All King County Percent of adults age 16-64 receiving unemp oyment benefits from 5/24/2020-5/30/2020 440 Click on the map to view claims for each ZIP code Ie chart below Continued claims per capita (St) �= Percent of Workers Receiving Unemployment 14.096 12.096 10.096 8.096 6.096 4.096 2096 00% View: Number of Workers Receiving UI Percent of Workers Receiving UI New Claims Filed This Week Use slider orarrowsto change week shown on map: 5/24/2020-5/30/2020 Show history Highlight ZIP code: No items highlighted "`Estimated by the total number of new UI claims per 100 people ages 16-64 - UI = Unemployment Insurance; -PUA Pandemic Unemployment Assistance; - PEUC = Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Claims; - E8 = Extended Benefits_ See Notes tab for details. Percent of workers receiving unemployment in King County by week 5.596 4/1/20 5/1120 6/1/20 7/1/20 8/1/20 9/1/20 10/1/20 11/1/20 12/1/20 1/1121 2/1/21 3/1/21 4/1121 5/1/21 6/1,/21 711/21 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS In fials Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review 07/19/21 JR ITEM INFORMATION ITEM NO. 5.B. 27 STAFF SPONSOR: HARI PONNEKANTI C)RIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 07/19/21 AGENDA ITEM TITLE BNSF Alternative Access Study EIS Process Budget, Schedule, and Next Steps CATEGORY Discussion 07/19/21 ❑ Motion Mtg Date ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mtg Date ❑ Bid Award Mt Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑ Other Mtg Date Ai tg Date SPONSOR ❑Council Mayor HR DCD ❑Finance Fire TS P&R ❑Police 11 PW ❑Court SPONSOR'S Staff is seeking Council direction on a funding path to implement an Environmental Impact SUMMARY Statement (EIS) for the BNSF Alternative Access Study, as well as hire a Term -Limited Project Manager to manage the EIS process and the EIS consultant qualification request. An EIS is intended to be an impartial tool to identify and analyze probable adverse environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and possible mitigation for the impacts. The funding required is anticipated to be in the range of $900,000 - $1,200,000. REVIEWED BY Trans&Infrastructure ❑ CommunitySvs/Safety ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Planning/Economic Dcv. ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. COMMITTEE CHAIR: VERNA SEAL ❑ LTAC DATE: 07/12/21 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. COMMITTEE Public Works Department Unanimous Approval; Forward to New Business COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $900,000 - 1,200,000 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: I Comments: I MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 07/19/21 I MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 07/19/21 Informational Memorandum dated 07/09/21 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Meeting Info Memo- Dated May 21, 2021 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes- Dated June 14, 2021 Minutes from Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting of 07/12/2021 27 28 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Pub.k Works Deportment - Hari P+annek roti, Director/City Engineer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg DATE: July 9, 2021 SUBJECT: BNSF Alternative Access Study Project No. 99510409 EIS Process Budget, Schedule, and Next Steps ISSUE Information regarding the BNSF Alternative Access Study Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process, identifying budget sources, outlining consultant selection process, and project schedule. Staff is requesting direction on a funding path to implement a Term -Limited Project Manager to manage the EIS process and the EIS consultant qualification request. BACKGROUND On June 14, 2021, at the Committee of the Whole Meeting, Council directed Public Works staff to proceed with staff recommended Options 1 and 2, which include updating costs estimates and a full EIS review of all alternate routes. Option 1: Update Previous Cost Estimates: Estimated cost is $15,000 to $50,000 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will be approximately $15,000 to $50,000. Option 2: EIS on all alternatives: Estimated cost is $750,000 to $900,000 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact application process is approximately $750,000 to $900,000. The cost would depend on the scope, such as the number of route alternatives (or the number of environmental elements) selected for review. The estimated timeline for completing this EIS is 18 to 24 months. This EIS would be useful only for a certain period of time and depending on when funding was secured (if several years later due to Federal or State funding availability), it may need to be updated (supplemented) for an additional cost. A full EIS or partial EIS will both require the City to hire a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. This brings the total estimated costs up to $1.2 million dollars for the EIS and City staff requirements. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") on all four alternative routes as compared to the status quo / "no action" alternative is recommended prior to choosing a preferred route. An EIS is intended to be an impartial tool to identify and analyze probable adverse environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and possible mitigation for the impacts. An EIS is required when significant adverse environmental impacts are likely from a project, such as here, where two of the alternatives involve a new bridge across a salmon bearing river. If a full scope EIS is undertaken, all of the alternatives in the 2016 Draft BNSF Access Study would be analyzed, including the following four alternatives along with the status quo (S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge). 1 Airport Way S. 3 Gateway Drive - north leg 2 S. 112th Street 4 48th Avenue S. 29 Map of the study area and alternatives routes Environmental Elements Considered for EIS Analysis 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land and Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light and Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities Rhone; 2O6-433-1840 Email.: Mayor@TukwilaliVA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 30 1 Scoping is the first step in the EIS process. The purpose of scoping is to narrow the focus of the EIS to significant environmental issues, eliminate insignificant impacts from detailed study, and identify alternatives to be analyzed in the EIS. Scoping also provides notice to the public and other agencies that an EIS is being prepared and initiates their involvement in the process. The result of the scoping process might be a reduced number of access alternatives and/or environmental elements to be studied. While a narrower document will reduce costs, one that does not fully consider environmental impacts may be more vulnerable to legal challenge. DISCUSSION EIS Schedule Staff outlines the following schedule: 3rd Quarter of 2021 Identify Project Funding 3rd and 4th Quarter of 2021 Hire Term -Limited Project Manager 4th Quarter of 2021 Begin monthly progress meetings with the Allentown Community 1st Quarter of 2022 Start Request for Qualifications process for EIS consultant, select consultant, and bring contract to Council for approval 2nd Quarter of 2022 Start the EIS 4th Quarter 2023 Complete the EIS and report to Council and the Allentown Community Funding Sources The first step in the EIS schedule and process for the BNSF Alternative Access Study is to identify funding sources. Staff has identified five options for potential funding sources for this project: 1. Transfer unused funds from the 42nd Ave South Bridge Replacement Project design phase after utilizing the PSRC contingency grant funds. 2. Use ending fund balance from the general fund. (For example in 2020, we ended the year with over $1 million above our required reserves.) 3. Reallocate a portion of the Solid Waste Utility Tax for year 2022 and 2023 to this project. 4. Move/prioritize funds from other CIP projects during the next budget amendment process to provide a clear funding path for the BNSF Alternative Access Study EIS process. 5. Issue an Infrastructure Bond for the BNSF Alternative Access Study Project costs and take advantage of the low-interest rate. The Bond can be repaid over several years. FINANCIAL IMPACT The overall staffing and consultant costs were in the range of $900,000 - $1,200,000. The interest payment cost will depend on the options chosen from above. Final direction on the funding choices above should be included in the budget amendment process. Staff will proceed hiring a Term -Limited Project Manager to complete the consultant qualification request and EIS process. The project will start incurring costs in the beginning of 2022. RECOMMENDATION Discussion only. Attachments: Transportation & Infrastructure Services Meeting Info Memo- Dated May 21, 2021 Council of the Whole Meeting Minutes- Dated June 14, 2021 Phorse; 246-433-1840 + Email: Mayor TukwilaWA.gov' • Website: TukwilaliVAogov 2 31 32 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Palk Works Department - Hari Porinekantrz Director/C+ty &rrgirreer INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg DATE: May 21, 2021 SUBJECT: BNSF Alternative Access Study Project No. 99510409 Project Update and Next Steps ISSUE Information regarding the BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study. BACKGROUND The purpose of this memorandum is to share history and information regarding alternatives for a new truck traffic route into the BNSF intermodal yard to relieve truck traffic from the Allentown neighborhood ("the Project"). While the Tukwila City Council has been considering access alternatives for the BNSF intermodal yard since the late 1990's, no preferred alternative route has been selected. The goal of an alternative route has always been to improve the quality of life for residents in the Allentown, Duwamish and surrounding areas, which are impacted by the estimated 3,000 trucks per day (of the total 10,000 vehicles per day) which use the current route (status quo) on S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge to access the BNSF intermodal yard. These trucks impact air quality, noise, and the safety of residents. A common goal is to move this truck traffic out of the residential area. Selecting and creating an alternative route into the BNSF intermodal yard has several challenges due to overall costs, lack of funding options for an alternative route, environmental concerns and potential litigation. Immediately below is a historical timeline of events related to consideration of alternative routes. This timeline is based on available records and remembrances of those involved. I. Historical Alternative Route Consideration Timeline As shown below, in 1997, the City of Tukwila began studying access alternatives to the BNSF Intermodal Facility. Date Activity 1997 • Hanson & Wilson Co. Access Study for BNSF 1998 • Harding Lawson Associates Study 2000 • Cooper Consulting Engineering Study (because previous two studies presented substantially different capital estimates) May 2011 • City Council adopted Res 1741 opposing federal pre-emption relating to railroads • Council Member (CM) Hougardy met with Port Commissioner Tarleton to discuss BNSF expansion concerns • City met with BNSF to discuss alternate access • City sent letter to BNSF discussing lack of financial assistance, deterioration of 42nd Ave Bridge from truck traffic • BNSF response letter offering further discussions but no specifics https://lukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/engineering/PW Drop Box/01 TIC Agenda/2021 Agenda Items/TIC 05-24-21/g. BNSF Alternate Study/info memo BNSF alternatives 050721.docx 3 33 Date Activity July 2011 • • City met with BNSF to clarify understandings and address neighborhood concerns, Council Members (CMs), Ball Janik (Federal Lobbyist) and reps from Senator Murray, Senator. Cantwell, Congressman Smith in attendance City met with Allentown residents August 2011 • BSNF letter to city proposing to meet every six months and asserting no plans for expansion (follow up meetings were not made) February 2012 • City met with Ball Janik (Federal Lobbyist) to discuss BNSF and Strander Blvd Ext May 2012 • DC trip to meet with reps from Surface Transportation Board July 2012 • City met with BNSF followed by letter to Sen. Cantwell August 2012 • Allentown residents give public comment opposing alternative route on 115th/116th November 2012 • City met with BNSF April 2013 • • • City Council discussed BNSF Railyard City met with BNSF and Ball Janik to discuss engineering options, 30% design, EIS, cost sharing, pursuit of TIGER (Federal grant opportunity), neighborhood livability Council's CAP Committee discussed scope of work for neighborhood livability study May 2013 • City met with BNSF June 2013 • Council added BNSF Regional Access Center to Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) August 2013 • City Council discussed options for study/report for Allentown and BNSF intermodal facility October 2013 • City receives Request for Proposal (RFP) from BNSF on southern access alternatives for review March 2014 • City met with BNSF April 2014 • City forms internal working group of staff and three CMs May 2014 • • BNSF group meets with Allentown residents on draft Request for Quote (RFQ) for livability Mayor and CMs meet with Murray, Cantwell and Smith in DC June 2014 • • City talked with Smith office about cooperative funding agreement BNSF group met with Allentown residents July 2014 • • BNSF Workgroup Tour arranged by Ball Janik Cooperative Funding Agreement with BNSF for alternative access study November 2014 • • Neighborhood canvassing re: livability City Council discussion on draft scope of work for BNSF Facility Access Study March 2015 • Contract with David Evans and Associates for BNSF Facility Access Study August 2015 • Council briefed on progress of BNSF study - August 10, 2015 Council of the Whole (C.O.W.) December 2015 • Council briefed on progress of BNSF study - December 14, 2015 C.O.W. March 2016 • BNSF Access Study Open House (Tukwila Community Center and Online) November 2016 • BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study — Draft Alternative Screening Analysis Report November 28, 2016 December 2016 • Draft Study findings transmitted to City Council March 2017 • City met with BECU to discuss their concerns with the Gateway Drive alternative Phone; 206-433-1800 * Email.; Mayor@TukwilaVVA.gov « Website: TukwiiawA.gcv 34 4 Date Airport Way S. 3 Activity May 2017 S. 112th Street • Notice of SEPA Application issued with comment period ending - June 2, 2017 August 2017 • Open House — Preferred Alternative Outreach -. August 17, 2017 September 2017 • Bob Giberson retires; Robin Tischmak becomes Interim Public Works Director January 2018 • Henry Hash becomes Public Works Director March 2019 • Great Northern Corridor Coalition (GNCC) Meeting and Tour of the BNSF South Seattle Intermodal Facility. March 27, 2019 June 2019 • • TIS Committee discussed project and sent to C.O.W. Councilmembers toured BNSF facility October 2019 • CM Kruller toured BNSF facility with NLC's Brittney Kohler July 2020 • Hari Ponnekanti named Interim Public Works Director February 2021 • Hari Ponnekanti appointed Public Works Director May 2021 • Council's Transportation and Infrastructure Committee agenda item June 2021 • Public open house to be held II. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS In 2015, the City of Tukwila and BNSF jointly funded an access study for a total cost of $241,173.23 to determine a potential new alternative route for truck traffic into the intermodal yard. As part of the study, open houses were held and community input was collected. The following four alternatives were considered along with the status quo (S. 124th St. and 42nd Ave. S. bridge). 1 Airport Way S. 3 Gateway Drive - north leg 2 S. 112th Street 4 48th Avenue S. In December 2016, the City began environmental review of the access study by completing a SEPA checklist. After receiving comments that probable, significant adverse environmental impacts of some for the truck route alternatives would trigger the requirement for a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the City paused environmental review in August 2017 due to several factors, including but not limited to: City staff did not clearly articulate the various challenges associated with the alternative access effort, including: o No budget or clear direction for completing next phases of alternative access study o Required environmental regulatory process and potential project opponents o Increased concerns regarding 42nd Ave S. Bridge and focus on securing state grant funds (City applied for bridge replacement grant funds in 2017 and 2019 without success) o Other capital project priorities on Capital Improvement Plan, (such as the Strander Boulevard extension into Renton and 42nd Ave S. Bridge replacement) - Changes in city personnel Phone; 2O6-433-1$40 * Email: Mayor@TitikwillaWA.gov + Website: TukwilaliVA.gcv 5 35 Map of the study area and alternatives routes Phone: 206433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWNA.gov 36 6 III. POTENTIAL NEXT STEPS To move forward with an alternative access analysis, the environmental review must be resumed for a set of feasible alternatives and the status quo (no action alternative). Early SEPA review requires having each of the access alternatives defined well enough to adequately conduct the review for possible environmental impacts. A. SEPA Review of All Routes (EIS). Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") on all four alternative routes as compared to the status quo / "no action" alternative is recommended prior to choosing a preferred route. An EIS is intended to be an impartial tool to identify and analyze probable adverse environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and possible mitigation for the impacts. An EIS is required when significant adverse environmental impacts are likely from a project, such as here, where two of the alternatives involve a new bridge across a salmon bearing river. If a full scope EIS is undertaken, all of the alternatives in the 2016 Draft BNSF Access Study would be analyzed. Below are the elements considered during SEPA review/analysis: Environmental Elements for SEPA Analysis 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy and Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land and Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light and Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities Scoping is the first step in the EIS process. The purpose of scoping is to narrow the focus of the EIS to significant environmental issues, eliminate insignificant impacts from detailed study, and identify alternatives to be analyzed in the EIS. Scoping also provides notice to the public and other agencies that an EIS is being prepared, and initiates their involvement in the process. The result of the scoping process might be a reduced number of access alternatives and/or environmental elements to be studied. While a narrower document will reduce costs, one that does not fully consider environmental impacts may be more vulnerable to legal challenge. IV. PROJECT CHALLENGES The Project presents numerous, significant challenges. The status quo involves the 42nd Ave S bridge, which is nearing the end of its useful life, is beyond repair and requires replacement. All potential alternatives are challenging due to overall costs, lack of funding options for an alternative route, environmental concerns and potential litigation. Anticipated Cost Considerations: Option 1: Update Previous Cost Estimates: Estimated cost is $15,000 to $50,000 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will be approximately $15,000 to $50,000. Option 2: EIS on all alternatives: Estimated cost is $750,000 to $900,0001 Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact application process is approximately $750,000 to $900,000. The cost would depend on the scope, such as the number of route alternatives (or the number of environmental elements) selected for review. The estimated timeline for completing this EIS is 18 to 24 months. This EIS would be useful only for a certain period of time and depending on when funding was secured (if several years later due to Federal or 1 Updated (April 2021) cost estimate from David Evans and Associates; a limited scope EIS would be less, yet likely could still cost between $500,000 and $750,000. Phone; 206 -433 -MO * Email: Mayor@TtikwillaWA.gov * Website: TukwilaWA.gov 7 37 State funding availability), it may need to be updated (supplemented) for an additional cost. A full EIS or partial EIS will both require the City to hire a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. This brings the total estimated costs up to $1.2 million dollars for the EIS and City staff requirements. Option 3: Research and analyze funding options to secure future funding if feasible: Seek via State and Federal funding for an alternative access route, once it has been defined. At this time there is a current lack of funding for new bridges, which are proposed in two of the four alternatives, as such, there is not currently a good fit for state and federal funding. However, the potential for a Federal infrastructure package may occur, but is unknown at this time. Nor are the application requirements known. Those potential funds may be used to fix deteriorating infrastructure rather than `build new'. The City will follow this closely. In addition, if a bridge was chosen as the alternate access, it will serve primarily as a bridge for freight traffic. Access to Baker Commodities or residential use would have to be considered but may be a design challenge in certain cases. The reality that the public will not be able to use this infrastructure, and that it will largely benefit private industry, makes it a difficult candidate for public funding. Project Costs Project costs for any alternative are unknown until preliminary engineering is underway. For example, an estimated cost for the 48th Ave S. route alternative, developed in 2016, was approximately $20 million. Due to price escalation, in 2019, it was estimated that this cost could have nearly doubled to $34M. Any estimate will need to be updated, and based on this alternative's less than 10% design, any alternative's design would need to progress further to get a better cost estimate. An example of a project in the City for comparison is the Strander Boulevard easterly extension into Renton, WA. That project was originally estimated at $29 million, upon completion of design work, it was identified at $80 million. The City, even with existing State and Federal resources, did not have the money to proceed with the project, so it was cancelled. The City had received Federal grant funding of $5 million for the design work, but since the project was stopped, the City had to return that funding to the Federal Government. Potential Litigation Due to the complexity of these alternatives, there are various entities who may challenge any of these alternatives, including adjacent property owners, tribal governments, other city and state governments, and local businesses. FINANCIAL IMPACT Option 1: Staff estimates that the supplemental costs to update the David Evans contract for the cost estimate revisions to the report will be approximately $15,000 to $50,000. Please note that these cost estimates are based on a very preliminary engineering design and are subject to change. Option 2: Staff also estimates that the supplemental costs to start and finish an environmental impact statement process is approximately $750,000 to $900,000. This effort will also require a term -limited Project Manager at a cost of approximately $300,000 for two years. The total for Option 2 is approximately up to $1.2 million dollars. RECOMMENDATION It is Staffs recommendation that it would be most appropriate to proceed with Options 1 and 2. ATTACHMENTS: Draft BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study - Draft Alternative Screening Analysis (full draft) Draft BNSF Intermodal Facility Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary Phone; 246-433-1840 * Email: Mayor@TukwilialiVA.gov • Website: TukwilawA.gov 38 8 BNSF RAILWAY INTERMODAL FACILITY ACCESS STUDY ALTERNATIVE SCREENING ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for: City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98005 Prepared by: David Evans and Associates, Inc. 14432 SE Eastgate Way Bellevue, WA 98007 November 28, 2016 9 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2 SUMMARY OF DESIGN CRITERIA 2 ALTERNATIVES 2 Airport Way S Alternative 4 S 112th Street Alternative 4 S 124th Street Alternative 4 Gateway Drive Alternative 5 48th Avenue 5 Alternative 5 SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION 6 Critical and Sensitive Areas 6 Fish and Wildlife 6 Water Resources 6 Hazardous Materials 7 Geological and Soils 7 Cultural and Historical Resources 7 SCREENING MATRIX 7 Matrix Criteria 8 Scoring Methodology 10 SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES 11 CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ESTIMATES 13 CONCEPTUAL PLAN SHEETS 13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1— Project Study Area 3 Figure 2 — Selection Criteria Screening Matrix 12 APPENDICES Appendix A — Alternative Plan Sheets Appendix B — Truck Access Routes Appendix C — Roadway Cost Estimate Back-up P:ItITUKA00000013s0600INF{)i0670FeportstSNSa= Intermodal Access Screening summary 2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila i Alternative Screening Analysis 40 BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201610 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Alternative Screening Analysis Report for the City of Tukwila was prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. to evaluate alternative access to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway intermodal facility in Tukwila, Washington. This facility is also known as South Seattle Yard. BNSF Railway also sponsored this study. The existing access to the intermodal facility uses 42nd Avenue S and S 124th Street. S 124th Street is also a residential collector street serving the community of Allentown. Several residential homes with driveways are located on S 124th Street, as is the Tukwila Community Center which houses an aquatic center, meeting rooms, classes and activities for all ages, and playground and ball fields. This study did not create new alternatives but used alternatives that were developed by previous studies. A total of five alternatives were studied: Airport Way S, S 112th Street, S 124th Street, Gateway Drive — North Leg, and 48th Avenue S. Several desktop researches were performed as part of this study. These researches included critical and sensitive areas, fish and wildlife, water resources, hazardous materials, geological and soils, and cultural and historical resources. A scored screening matrix was developed collaboratively between the City of Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. The matrix was presented to Tukwila City Council as well as to the public for their feedback on the screening matrix criteria. The public was allowed to provide feedback via an on-line open house and an in-person open house. Representatives from Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. met to score each alternative using a numerical scoring system from 1 to 9. The score for each criteria was added, and the lowest score is the preferred alternative. Based on the scoring result, the 48th Avenue S alternative is the preferred alternative. P:ItITUKA00000013106001NF010670ReportslBNSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 1 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201611 41 42 INTRODUCTION Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway owns an intermodal facility that transfers containers from trucks to railroad and vice versa. This facility is located within the City of Tukwila city limits in the Allentown community. The intermodal facility is adjacent to Interstate 5 (1-5) and just south of King County International Airport, also known as Boeing Field. BNSF calls this facility South Seattle Yard. The only access route to the intermodal facility is along the southern edge of the Allentown community on S 124th Street. In order to improve livability and safety without compromising the operations of the yard, the community and the City are seeking an alternative access route to the intermodal facility. PROJECT BACKGROUND The project area is located in the incorporated community of Allentown, within the City of Tukwila. For several years, the City has worked with Allentown residents on issues related to community impacts resulting from the BNSF South Seattle Intermodal Facility, and on identifying alternatives for a rerouted truck access—one with fewer adverse impacts on the neighborhood. Trucks currently use 42nd Avenue S and S 124th Street to access the rail facility. Over 20 different alternatives for truck access to the rail facility have been studied since 1998. Truck traffic has increased along the existing truck route over the last several years, due to increased rail activity. The approximately 50 homes along S 124th Street experience 24-hour per day truck traffic, adding to the other existing airport, highway, and train noise levels in the neighborhood. Truck traffic also creates safety issues for residents. Trucks back up at the checkpoint station at the east end of 5 124th Street, idling on S 124th Street, waiting to check into the rail facility, creating access difficulties, vehicle exhaust, noise, and safety issues for residents. SUMMARY OF DESIGN CRITERIA After discussions with the City, the typical roadway section for this project used a 12 -foot lane, 5 - foot bike lane, 5 -foot landscape strip, and 5 -foot sidewalk. The total width for this roadway section is 75 feet (includes 1 -foot for curbs on both side of the street). This same width was also used for the bridge section. In developing the concept roadway profiles, a design speed of 35 mph was used. Since the new access would primarily be used by trucks, the maximum roadway grade used was five percent. ALTERNATIVES The City of Tukwila began studying access alternatives to the BNSF Intermodal Facility in 1998. An alternative study was performed by Harding Lawson Associates. Another access alternative study was performed by Cooper Consulting Engineering in 2000. This access study did not develop new alternatives, but used leading alternatives from these previous studies. P:ItITUKA0000001310600INFO10670ReportslBNSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 2 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201612 Figure 1 shows the project study area. The following provides a description for each alternative. Figure 1— Project Study Area S 112th Street Alternative a.. 48th Avenue S Extension Alternative Nc P:ItITUKA0000001306001NFD10670RepertstEINSF Intermodal Access Screening summary 2016-1126.docx City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access 3 Alternative Screening Analysis November 28, 201613 43 44 Airport Way S Alternative This alternative access would connect the northern end of the intermodal facility to Airport Way S. The existing railroad maintenance road would be reconstructed and provide ingress and egress to the intermodal facility. A new intersection and traffic signal would be required at Airport Way and the access road. Plan sheets for this alternative can be found in Appendix A. Due to geometric constraints and the alignments of Airport Way S and the new access road, access from Airport Way south of the new intersection to the intermodal facility is not feasible. Entry and exit from the intermodal facility would only be north of the new intersection. Taking into account these restrictions, 1-5 freeway access would be via S Norfolk Street, East Marginal Way S, and S Boeing Access Road. A figure of the truck freeway access route can be found in Appendix B. This alternative access would require the existing bridge on S Boeing Access Road over the railroad tracks to be reconstructed due to the width of the new access road and the existing bridge configuration. This alternative would require the intermodal facility to construct the following at the north end of the yard: a check-in/check-out facility, truck queuing lanes, an operations building, and a truck storage access road along the western edge of the facility. This new road cannot be built within the existing BNSF parcel, so new right-of-way would be required. S 112th Street Alternative This alternative would connect to the northern half of the intermodal facility. This new roadway would begin at East Marginal Way S and use the existing Seattle Public Utilities and Seattle City Light utilities corridor. The utilities corridor borders a shooting range to the north, and Duwamish Hill Preserve and a residential neighborhood to the south. A bluff separates the higher -elevation residential neighborhood from S 112th Street to the north and the rail facility to the east. The existing utility corridor contains three separate high-power transmissions lines and a large - diameter water line, as seen in aerial photos. Plan sheets for this alternative can be found in Appendix A. The truck freeway access route to 1-5 would be via East Marginal Way S and S Boeing Access Road. A figure of the truck freeway access route can be found in Appendix B. This alternative would require the intermodal facility to construct the following at the north end of the yard: a check-in/check-out facility, truck queuing lanes, an operations building, and a truck storage access road along the western edge of the facility. This new road cannot be built within the existing BNSF parcel, so new right-of-way would be required. S 124th Street Alternative This alternative would use the existing route and connect into the intermodal facility at its current location. Truck traffic would continue to access the rail facility using Interurban Avenue S, 42nd Avenue S, S 124th Street, and the existing check-in/check-out facility. No improvements or changes would occur to the streets along the route as part of this project. This route is adjacent to P:ItITUKA00000013106001NF0I0670ReportsIBNSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 4 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201614 approximately 50 homes and the Tukwila Community Center, and runs through the middle of the Allentown neighborhood. Impacts to the neighborhood associated with the truck traffic would continue, similar to existing conditions, and could continue to worsen, based on recent increases in freight -related truck traffic in this area. Due to its age and service life, the 42nd Avenue S bridge over the Duwamish River would require replacement. Plan sheets for this alternative can be found in Appendix A. As a mitigation measure for the truck noise, it is assumed that a noise wall would be constructed along the northern edge of 42nd Avenue S. The construction of this new noise wall would require the acquisition of all homes whose driveways are on 42nd Avenue S. Also, seven roadways (43rd Avenue S, 44th Avenue S, 45th Avenue S, 46th Avenue S, 47th Avenue S, 48th Avenue S, and 49th Avenue S) would have their access to 42nd Avenue S closed. These streets would become dead-end streets, and new cul-de-sacs would be constructed at the south end of each street. All of the neighbor access would be shifted to S 122nd Street to the north. There would be no changes to freeway access with this alternative. A figure of the truck freeway access route can be found in Appendix B. There would be no changes to the intermodal facility as part of this alternative. Gateway Drive Alternative This alternative access would connect to the intermodal facility at its current check-in/check-out location. This alternative would begin at Interurban Avenue S, use the north leg of Gateway Drive, construct a new roadway between the Boeing Employee Credit Union (BECU) buildings, construct a bridge over the Green River Trail and Duwamish River, go through residential parcels, and tie into the existing intermodal check-in/check-out facility. This alternative would construct three new at - grade intersections at Gateway Drive (east leg), 50th Place S, and 51st Place S. The new bridge would include a 10 -foot -wide pedestrian facility. Plan sheets for this alternative can be found in Appendix A. The truck freeway access route to 1-5 would be via Interurban Avenue S. A figure of the truck freeway access route can be found in Appendix B. There would be no changes to the intermodal facility as part of this alternative. 48th .Avenue S Alternative This alternative access would connect to the southern end of the intermodal facility. This alternative would begin at Interurban Avenue S, use the existing 48th Avenue S roadway, and construct a new bridge over the Green River Trail and Duwamish River, as well as a roadway that goes under the existing S 129th Street bridge and into the rail yard facility. The new bridge would include a 10 -foot -wide pedestrian facility. Plan sheets for this alternative can be found in Appendix A. The truck freeway access route to 1-5 would be via Interurban Avenue S. A figure of the truck freeway access route can be found in Appendix B. P:ItITUKA00000013106001NF010670ReportslBNSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 5 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201615 45 46 This alternative would require the intermodal facility to construct new truck queuing and exiting lanes. All new lanes can be constructed within BNSF parcels. No construction or modification would be needed at the existing check-in/check-out facility or operation building. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION To assist in screening the alternatives, existing information in the following subjects was gathered and displayed as geographic information system (GIS) maps. No field work was conducted, and the information for the existing conditions came from publicly -available sources. An Existing Conditions Technical Memorandum was prepared for each subject area. This information will also be used in the technical discipline reports prepared as part of the environmental documentation under SEPA. • Critical and Sensitive Areas • Fish and Wildlife • Water Resources • Hazardous Materials • Geological and Soils • Cultural and Historical Resources The following sections provide a summary of the findings. Critical and Sensitive Areas The project area is located in the Puget Sound lowlands, within the tidally -influenced Duwamish estuary ecosystem. Category III and IV wetlands exist within the project study area. The Duwamish River runs through the middle of the project area and is designated by the City of Tukwila as a shoreline of statewide significance. Fish and Wildlife Fish and wildlife use of the project study area is limited by its high density of industrial, commercial, and residential development. Terrestrial wildlife habitat in the project area is limited to the buffers of wetlands, the narrow riparian fringe along the Duwamish River, and a few scattered undeveloped steep slopes and undeveloped parcels. Fish use in the Duwamish River, which contains a wide range of native and nonnative fish species, includes several species listed as threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), including Chinook salmon, steelhead trout, and bull trout. Water Resources According to the King County Aquifer Recharge Area map, no critical aquifer recharge areas are located within the project area. Since the Duwamish River is a designated floodway that is contained by constructed levees, there are no 100 -year or 500 -year floodplains located within the project study area. All alternatives fall within Tukwila's shoreline jurisdiction. P:ItITUKA000000130600/NF0406:0RepolV8NSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 6 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201616 The Duwamish River is on the Ecology 303(d) list for over 300 water quality pollutants. Hazardous Materials Hazardous material sites were identified within the project study area. Each site was assigned a risk rating (low, medium, or high). The risk assigned was based on professional judgment considering each site's distance to the alternative footprint, type, duration of historical development, contaminated media, known gradient and contaminant migration potential. The majority of the sites were classified as low risk. Concerns exist based on historical or current development, but the likelihood for conditions at the site to affect the project is assessed as relatively low. Geological and Soils The project study area is located within the Duwamish River valley. Prior to human modifications, the Duwamish River was a natural distributary channel of the Cedar and Green Rivers, as well as the White River. These rivers originate on the flanks of Mount Rainer. Predominate geologic units mapped in the area of the proposed route alternatives include: alluvium, bedrock, and glacial deposits. The alternative routes are primarily located within the areas mapped as alluvial deposits. Bedrock is mapped along the southeastern edge of the Duwamish River valley in the project study area. Exposed bedrock outcrops are also mapped in the northern portion of the project area while a glacial deposit area was mapped along the southwestern edge of the project study area. In general, there are relative good soils within the project area; however, the potential of liquefaction does exist within the project study area, especially along the riverbanks. Cultural and Historical Resources The project study area is within an area identified by local Native American groups as a traditionally important landscape. Traditional cultural properties are known to be in the vicinity of each access alternative. Remnants of electric railroad may be located at the western ends of all of the alternatives, and would be considered as items of archaeological importance if encountered. The project study area contains several buildings, structures, and objects (BSO) that are 35 years or older. The majority of these BSOs are residential homes. Survey and elevations need to be performed to determine if they are eligible for registry. SCREENING MATRIX In the following two sections, an explanation of the selection criteria matrix is presented. The first section, Matrix Criteria, discusses the criteria groups and each individual criterion. The second section, Scoring Methodology, discusses the approach used to score each alternative. P:ItITUKA00000013106001NFO10670Reports44NSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 7 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201617 47 Matrix Criteria A screening matrix was developed to score the alternatives. The City of Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. worked collaboratively to create the screening matrix. The matrix was then presented to the City Council and the public for their comments. Bob Giberson, Tukwila Public Works Director, presented the screening matrix to the City Council. The City Council did not have any comments on the screening matrix. The screening matrix was presented to the public via two venues: an on-line open house and an in- person open house. The public did not have any comments on the screening matrix. The screening matrix contained four groups of scoring criteria. The groups and group descriptions are as follow: • Right -of -Way This group evaluates the need for new right-of-way to construct the alternative and railroad yard modifications and the complexity or difficulties in obtaining the new right- of-way. • Construction This group evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts of constructing the alternatives. • Railroad This group evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts to the operations of the existing railroad intermodal facility. • Environmental This group evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts to the environment, preparing the required environmental documentation, and obtaining construction permits. For each of these groups, more in depth scoring criteria were used. The following section describes these additional scoring criteria. Right -of -Way • Residential This criterion evaluates the need for new residential right-of-way to construct the alternative, and the complexity or difficulties in obtaining the new residential right-of- way. • Commercial This criterion evaluates the need for new commercial right-of-way to construct the alternative, and the complexity or difficulties in obtaining the new commercial right-of- way. P:I8TUKA00000013106001 F00670ReponsONSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 48 BNSF Intermodal Facility Access 8 Alternative Screening Analysis November 28, 201618 • Vacant Land This criterion evaluates the need for new vacant land right-of-way to construct the alternative, and the complexity or difficulties in obtaining the new vacant land right-of- way. Const rt • Utilities Relocation This criterion evaluates the complexity or difficulties of relocating existing utilities (power, telephone, gas, water, etc.). A couple of examples are the type of overhead lines (transmission versus distribution), and the size of water line (12 inches versus 6 feet). • Road Construction This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts to existing roadways in constructing the alternative. Some examples are roadway horizontal or profile revisions, stormwater or sidewalk reconstruction, and illumination/traffic signals construction or revisions. • Impacts Traffic during Construction This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts to existing traffic in constructing the alternative. Some impact examples are the number of days and hours for lane or roadway closures, the length of detour routes, and the delays for vehicles to reach their destination. Railroad • Railroad Yard Access To and From Freeway This criterion evaluates the complexity or difficulties of vehicle access from the railroad intermodal facility to the freeway and vice versa. Some examples are the distance a vehicle travels from the intermodal facility to the freeway, the number of signalized intersections a vehicle will cross, and the turning movements (i.e., right turns versus left turns). • BNSF Yard Access Reliability This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts to providing a reliable access to the intermodal facility. The main criterion is the risk associated with an alternative for a closure of a route that restricts access to the facility. This could be due to any reason: bridge closure or collapse, flooding, or road closure. • Impacts to Railroad Operations This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts to existing intermodal facility operations. Some examples are relocating the check-in/check-out facility, relocating the operations building, vehicle circulations within the facility, or access to storage areas. P:ItITUKA00000013906001NF01067OReparesISAISF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 9 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201619 49 • Air Quality This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts of air quality. • Noise This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts of noise to sensitive receivers. • Historic. Cultural. and Archaeological Resources This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts on historical structures and to cultural or archaeological sites. • Critical/Sensitive Areas This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts to critical and sensitive areas. • Geotechnical This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts of geotechnical items to the construction of the alternative. • Traffic - Operations This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts of traffic operations due to the alternative. • Permitting This criterion evaluates the complexity, difficulties, and impacts of obtaining permits needed to construct each alternative. The last group in the screening matrix is construction cost. This was included for information purposes only. The construction cost was separated into two groups. The first one, Roadway Construction, represents the cost to construct the roadway improvements, or reconstruction of the existing roadway. The second one, Railroad Yard Construction, represents the cost to construct improvements or reconstruct the intermodal facility. Scoring Methodology A numerical scoring system was used to score each alternative. The scoring range was 1-9 with 1 representing the least difficulty or complexity and 9 representing the most difficulty or complexity. With this system, the preferred alternative will have the lowest total. In addition to a numerical score, a color coding system was implemented in order to provide a quick of the scoring. The colors used were red, yellow, and green. The color assignment for the numerical scores is as follows: P:ItITUKA000000110600INFO'0670F eportsONSF Intermodal Access Screening summary 2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 10 Alternative Screening Analysis 50 BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201620 Color Numerical Score Description Green 1 through 3 Low Complexity/Difficulty Yellow 4 through 6 Medium Complexity/Difficulty Red 7 through 9 High Complexity/Difficulty SCORING OF ALTERNATIVES The selection criteria matrix was sent to the City of Tukwila and BNSF Railway in order for them to score, independently, each alternative. David Evans and Associates, Inc. also scored each alternative independently. On July 20, 2016, representatives from City of Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. met to develop a collaborative score for each alternative. The following figure shows the scoring as a result of this meeting. P:ItITUKA0000001310600INFO10670ReportsIBNSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 11 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201621 51 Figure 2 — Selection Criteria Screening Matrix 52 SELECTION CRITERIA MATRIX 1 Cost 1 (suoIIIW) lso3 loa)ad moio CO ER v oi 6.3 a) N 69- coco N 69 69 (suolliw) lso3 uoponJlsuoo We), PeoJlle2ti 0 rn EA 0 cci EA 0 ER 0 ci vt .1: EA I (suo!IIW) l503 uop3rusuo3 Aempeod co of EA v N Efl a) N EA CO N EA a) 69 p a -103S Rlol ,-c T T CO coo Environmental velours cNng.3s v v supliwiad w r- cQ co (0 suopeJado - aweu co r- co ccs LO leo!UEloWOO v v r- n r- sea.iy OAplsuaSAeollN3 r- r- v r< r- saomosaa IealsoloaeyoJy pue 'Krum 'puolsp { N N a) co co SON cc) a) co r, /Wen° my co r- ' cc) r) c\ Railroad 1 moms N N ' 0) suolleJado peomeb of spedw! a) a) co Aupciella?J ssa33y P.eA dSNB o) v LC) v v AemaaJd WOil pue of ssaooy pie), peo.med co co co v c'') 1 Construction 1 IelogInS N N a uoly3nJlsuo3 sulxip oweu spedwl a) v a) co r- uollarulsuo3 peod rn N 0) CO r- uolleoolaa sap!IIlf1 a) ' a) v r- co — Right -of -Way lelol4ns 0 ('-4 4- N r pue1lue3eA rn a) 1 CO (0 co Iel3Jawwoo O) a) N CT) co lelluapisaM co 0o a) r- E/! w E 0.1 Q Airport Way S S 112th Street S 124th Street Gateway Drive - North Leg 48th Avenue SE Low Complexity/Difficulty Medium Complexity/Difficulty v High Complexity/Difficulty (72 r• 22 U r g summary 2016 modal Access Scr 4) U 1) T U CO LL f9 = O �L L I- 4' C O LL > c/) +' Z U CO CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ESTIMATES Conceptual construction costs and right-of-way estimates were determined for each alternative. The construction cost estimates were separated into three categories: roadway construction cost (includes bridge construction), railroad construction cost, and right-of-way acquisition cost. The estimates were by three separate entities. The conceptual roadway construction cost estimates were determined by David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA). The railroad costs were determined by BNSF Railway. The right-of-way costs were determined by Abeyta & Associates, a right-of-way specialist, and a subconsultant to DEA. The following table provides the conceptual costs for roadway construction, roadway right-of-way, railroad facilities construction, and railroad right-of-way. Alternative Conceptual Cost Estimate (in millions) Roadway Costs Railroad Costs Roadway Right -of -Way Railroad Right -of -Way Total Airport Way S $14.5 - $19.3 $0 $58.5 - $78.0 $9.0 - $12.0 $98.3 - $109.3 S 112th Street $12.4 - $16.6 $3.6 - $4.8 $47.7 - $63.6 $3.3 - $4.4 $80.5 - $89.4 S 124th Street $18.9 - $25.3 $ 2.7 - $3.6 $0 $0 $26.0 - $28.9 Gateway Drive -North Leg $11.3 - $15.0 $6.2 - $8.3 $0 $0 $21.o- $23.3 48th Avenue S $10.2 - $13.6 $1.7 - $2.3 $3.3 - $4.4 $0 $18.3 - $20.4 CONCEPTUAL PLAN SHEETS For each alternative, plan sheets were created. These plan sheets show the proposed roadway edges and new right-of-way. Intermodal facility new construction is not included in these plans. P:ItITUKA0000001310600INF010670ReporlslBNSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila 13 Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201623 53 54 Appendix A — Alternative Plan Sheets P:ItITUKA0000001810600INF010670ReportskaNSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201624 55 56 1 lif9iliftWrio oiliiR 1j31 -IS 33S ZOdd 3N1-1H01dW 05+9 'dls - , ZOdd 133HS 33S 09+9 'VIS 3NI1H3IWi 0 0 r M N u N „ + cV m r QJ 99 94+9 :S )A3 0 2 d N , W <W U W Y 0 a 0. r I 0 x 94 10 30A 16 zL+L SCAB W 0 4 a O o_ 0 - 0 0 90-00 =30/A 10870+9 9023 tt0 of s0AB ZZ L£a-'b 'S )A8 0491 = 2319 0101+0 = 719 »7308 30Vd` 0 O O O 0 0 bZlZ z4 l0 09'10 00 00 90 1Z 79 00 0110 96 10 98 00 97 lZ 09 0Z 62 OZ 90 0Z 00 00 40 00 S661 64 61 90`61 19 81 00"8l O + m 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 L va n 0 O BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AIRPORT WAY S. ALTERNATIVE 0, O a 0 CO 0 LL 0 U Q 0 0 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING 6mp-01.00V)Ifll-lOdd AVM700d8IV 11V-11\S133HSLL1\4V00040\67000000V)IIl1V6d - wd4Z Z 0407/1I. 01P 57 UPIAMMPIIIR WEI COdd 133HS 33S 00+ZI- 'VIS 3NI1HOIWW Odd 133HS 33S OO+Z 'VIS 3 N I1HOEVIN O 0 0 0 p ,() 10 M N 5I•ZZ ,30A= 199 91+£1 OA 1£9ZZ 30A0 £9 L6+11 .93A3 ll ZZ 30A8 £9 29+-11. 3>9 _CZ ZZ 30A,i. SSS 96+01 ` OA3 19/ 1Z ,33>6 3 0 O 10 1° 0 SS £9+01 -'0A8 96 09 33A_. 117S 6L+6 50/%3 t i 0!_ 0Z 33A£1 ..39 60+5 5 M8 0 0 90 ZZ Lc) 0/ lZ 99'ZZ 08 1Z .61./Z 68 19 b£ 1Z 90 1 Z 99 OZ 00 09 bL OZ 00.0Z 0 0 0 0 N IOdd 133HS 33S 09+9 'V1S 3NI1HOIVIN 0 0 31 0 0 0 6, rZ 1Z Z£ 19 ro 0 a n. 0 w 0 0 0) w 0 0 >- ✓ J _ 0 LL J z 0 z w 1- z_ //LL V/� J z m ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AIRPORT WAY S. ALTERNATIVE U Z1.6 o0 M Z W (.00 0 a� >a_ ;o w o0�yV > 'A j N a VI 0 a v , o d Z m 0 O d 0 0 O 0 0 v d 0 W a 0 .2 a *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING 6'PEL00VW11-ZOdd ASMl10 ll\S133HSU110V00040\EL000000VW11\1Fd- wdLZZ61.21/LL 01P 58 lir NA' Wimil WI El daiRI 60dd 133HS 33S OS+L 'VIS 3NI1HOIVW ZOdd 133HS 33S OO+Z1. 'd1S 3N11HOIVW 17Odd 133HS 33S 09+L1. 'VIS 3NI1H31t1W O O O O 0 0 V M N 0 Ls oz 3999 C9 L£+91 '093 O W 0 IL; 02 399E1 £9 Z9+LL S098 1£9 L0+91 -0099 0 _a a — a 3 o 50 O 26 61. 3090 Cca 7c- 0 0 Eta. l 0 d ZOdd 133HS 33S OO+Z� 'VIS 3NI1HO1VW 00 05 0961 62 0Z 40 02 Os 02 90 02 99 OZ 8£ 61 0 + rn 0 0 0 0' cO 0 c) Scale AS SHOWN Z 0 w 0 —J 0 w U Z 0 w Z w 1- J AIRPORT WAY S. ALTERNATIVE 0 0 0 LL 0 0 N U W a` *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING fimp'ELOOVWIl-EOdd 1.VM1210d8IV 1lV-ll\S133HSLL1\OV00040\EL000000V11111\16d- wd6Z-Z SLIZI/ll olp 59 Nii"91011M19ali WEI A440 £Odd 133HS 33S 09+LL '`d1S 3NIlH31VIN O 506 O7. = n3�3 96 60+ZZ VIS N1369 30559 55 61 3053 i O 159 L5+05 0053 }b8 61 305/1 59 55+61 1,059 F w 59 05 89 05 6S OZ 00 05 £t 05 Z OZ LO 00 66 LI L9 6l O 0 0 0 0 M N £0dd 133HS 23S 05+L L *VIS 3NIlHO LWJ Z L LL 61 £b'9I O 0 N O + O 0000 I 09 61 rn AS SHOWN 0 w 0 0 w 0 0 J 0 LL -J Z 0 Z w Z rU- MZ W ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AIRPORT WAY S. ALTERNATIVE 0 O LL 2 of 01 U W 0 01 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING WAVE LOOVNIU-YOddAVMldOdLIIV iiv-i11SJ.33HSLLIIQYIxPY1gEl OOOOOportiuFd - wd9GZ 91151/11 OIP 60 ZOdd l]9HS J9S 00+9 'VIS 2NI1HOIVIN ZOdd 133HS gDS 09+9 'VIS 2NI1HOIVW O O O O p 1) f M N 26 61. 30A3 97 Lb+8 9OA3 > n' 740 61 30A8 _. _. 9h ZL+b..-SOAK 00'00 Sb 6L ZO OZ 09 6L o'OZ 0961 99 6L 8£ 61 6781 £L 61 00 91 9891 0091 £9'9 10 21 9£81 00 91 L' '9 40'9 +0'91 0 0 00 0 p \\777 7 N V€ 0 a 0 • Scale AS SHOWN 0 w 0 L.6 a. (1) w 0 U >- U J z 0 z w H z_ iL z m ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 112TH ST. ALTERNATIVE Z co N N W m Z W 00IO Q c0 CfD rn a Q �0u3 W V 4 L C N CI O N r Q (0 O 0 Q ;_92 c 61 z m 6Mp'ELW9W11-Ladd H.ZU ll9-ll\S133HSLL1\4900070\E 1000000yN(ll9Fd - Wd45:S SL/9 L/LL llw 61 £0dd 133HS 33S 00+ZI..VIS 3NIlHOIVW 1.0dd 133HS 33S 00+9 'V1S 3NI1H31VW 3 r o £0dd 133HS 33S 00+Z1, 'VIS 3NI1HOIVVI O O O 0 0 b0 41 33A_° 09 10+01 1 3A3 06 91 :3JAd 09 9Z+6 S)A9 0 Z w 0 1b"Sl 6Cl OL Cl 66'£ l 8601 26 Cl SZ bl L6 01 S9 61 L6 £1 00 Cl 90'61 Z8'21 bS b l £b 91 if 91 CO Ll L6 Ll b9 Ll 6181 9091 11 61 68 81 O O O O Lc-) - M N 1.0dd 133HS 33S 09+9 'V.'S 3NIlHO1VW 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .44 0 42 cn 1- 0 w 0 w w 0 0 >H J _ 0 w J z 0 1- cc w H z_ z m z 0 w 0 J 1- H a W 0 z 0 w 1- z w 1— J 112TH ST. ALTERNATIVE vi 0> 02 1 0 m 0 0 O U rn w nom`. 0 *ENGINEERING*STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING 6MP£L00V)111v0+J H.21/ 11V-ll\S133HSUl\OV00040\£L000000VNI11\1Vd - S 81191/1,111u 62 1 WdY1th WEI nit&O eOckl .1.3_31-13 3S ool-etb15 3N/7N0.. b � 1 17Odd 13HS 23S 09+LNI1H31VW o o 0 0 0 4) d 0 N f 0t 06+: l SOA] 63 IN '30A8 3t. 3L L6+Sil ,S3A8 63 L9 31 30,13 £9 68+£ l 5069 2L 31 90A8 £9 69+31 5069 93 91 3601 lb 01 9L b l 00 1,1 00 61 0£ 141 00 b1 96'£1 9L£/ 39 £1 94 £ l 93 E l 09£1 b6 31 Z£ £l 9931 31 L9 3) 60 31 62 31 o o 0 0 1) d M N ZOdd 1331-1S 33S 00+Z1. 'VIS 3N1-1H3IWJ 29 31 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 6- 0 a 0 N 9101 • o 0031 c) 0 0 9 Scale AS SHOWN 1- 0 w LL a w 0 U u_ 0 ,Z v w 0 J 1- H a w 0 Z 0 0 w 1 z w 1- J 112TH ST. ALTERNATIVE 1/i Z m u7 Z Li 0 W (0o 0 �c0 >Q N CO) W_ >0n Q U L 0 N NN U) C < 1) z CO tpla O 2 w 0 LL 0 0 U W 0/ 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING bmWEl00VN111-E0dd H121•1 11V-11\S133HSLL1\0V00040\EL 000000VNI1111Fd - Wd99.9 61/91/11 //0 63 `iiilmlimMMi WEI diall&R £Odd 133HS 33S 09+L1 '` IS 3NI1H3IWJ O O 0 0 0 M d M N (9 zw W 6 (0 0 0 0 O Ia 60 OZ 11 61 66 61 9121 60'02 IZ'Ll 0 6-S 1 O O 0 0 N 7 M N Odd 1331 -IS 33S 09+L'VIS 3N111 -131W1 9291 X661 u0 rn 0 0 a. 0 co 0 0 o to r 0 a 0 N Z 0 2 0 BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 112TH ST. ALTERNATIVE z_ W M Z W OOH > 'Q_+ W U LN O W /rA 7 N > G Q N O o m z m O 0 0 U w 0 0 a limp ELOOV)11i-40dd Hlill 11V-11\SJ99HSU1\OV00040\EL000000MUll(Od- Wd99:9 SL/91/1L 11W 64 iiii"IIMMI911 WEI didiNla IAD -IMO -139 S 3NI1HOIVW ZOdd 38S 2NI1HO1VW 1H9Ib 3AO9b' DDS ANI-11O1VW CO Crai ii BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN S. 124TH ST. ALTERNATIVE 0 0 0 LL I d U w -97 0 0 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING 0MP'El00VW11-1.0dd F 10 111V-ll0)J.0 HSLLl\OV00040\Ew00000VNIll\I\d- wtl85:L 91.21./l I. 01P 65 'if ift & £0dd 1AAHS AAS 00+9 '` IS 2NI7HO LW'J 66 £Odd 123HS A9S 00+9 '`d1S 3N111131VW O 6 O O p to :t 0 N 00 30 00 33 60 13 09 1Z 09 13 99 10 39"1Z 10"33 1,9 Z3 90 03 00.93 O O 0 0 0 0 4 0 N O O O O O 0 O 0 5 1 Scale AS SHOWN BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN S. 124TH ST. ALTERNATIVE U 1.Z Zi a CnW Z oc - =com co W_ao� 0 o y t >'A v, c c N o 0 Q v m 0 0 LL a a YN U W � C a E%1 *ENGINEERING*STREETS*WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING OMP'£LOOVWII-ZOdd H14Z1 11V-ll\S133HSUAOV000b0\ELOo0000VW11NFd - wdZOZ 9121/11 oIP tOdd 133HS D3S 09+1-1. 'VIS DNI1HOJVW ZOdd 138HS 33S 00+9 'd1S 3NI1H3IVIN diciii&R I fOdd 1DDHS 2J8 09+14 L "V1S 3 N I-1HOIVIN U 0 t7 N Z W F< w w 06 ZZ 09 00 00 40 00 60 6l£0 66 ZZ LS 00 10 ZZ 00'ZZ 00 ZZ 3NOW_I 00 ZZ O 0 0 0 0 ZOdd 12JHS 3DS 00+9 'VIS 3NI1H31VW 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 up 'M d 0_ Cra Scale AS SHOWN BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN S. 124TH ST. ALTERNATIVE 6) L LI 0) X00 Coro rn > 0 �1 ✓ 6)0 ra 6) m O= o 0 m 0 0 0 0 U w` 'o 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING 6mp EL00VW11-EOdd_H14ZL 11V-11\S133HSLL1\OV00060\EL000000VNf11\1Fd-wd79091/ZL/LL 011, 67 iiimildhWrilip WEI nii&O 90dd 133HS 33S OO+LL 'V1S 3NI1H31VW £0dd 133HS 33S 09+11- 'd1S 3NIlH31VW 90dd 133HS 33S OO+LL 'b�1S 3NIlHa1VW o o 0 0 0 1- 2 ZO ZZ 6Z ZZ 007Z 10 ZZ LO ZZ Z0Z0 Lb ZZ ZS ZZ OS"ZZ ZS ZZ SL ZZ o o o 0 0 10 £Odd 133HS 33S 00+I• 'd1S 3N1-1HOINW 06 ZZ 0 + 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 ce LL 0 0 0) Mr, I nets I 1:M 1- 0 w O 0 w 0 0 _ U J O u_ z m ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN S. 124TH ST. ALTERNATIVE 0. O F 0 0 � m U Q 0 0 0 0 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING 6mP'EIAO0Ir11-40dd H14ZL 11V-1.11S133}451.1144V70O6IIERGWOW'v'kf11\1Fd-w490Z 71/Z1.1110IP 68 iiiif"I:mWM: Will &ilia 90dd 133HS 33S 094 -ZZ 'VIS 3NI1HOEVW iOdd 133HS 33S 90dd 133HS 33S 05+ZZ '`d1S 3NI1HOIVW 0 0 0 0 o 10 21 10 21 1021 10 21 0021 1Z 61 £9 61 1900 96 0Z LZ 10 C, 0 0 0 0 00+LG 'd1S 3NI1H31VW iOdd 133HS 39S 00+LVIS 3NI1HOIWW Z0 00 0 0 0 0 + 0 + co 0 0 + 00 0 0 Scale AS SHOWN KI,, 1 n,sfe I De. 1- 0 w O O z EL 0 Lu U -J U Q Q I- ~ a. _ • W UV Q Z LL J z• > O f— z LL -1 LJLJ L.L H J Z Q Z LL z CO S. 124TH ST. ALTERNATIVE U Z m Z W cob `<F jOFDi < c W _ Q O 0 t cN Q O L d >�mw Q V! oQ 0 Z 0� O m 0 3 0 d U uJ 0 -a 0 4 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING 6009E 100V)IHl-SOdd H19Z1 11V-11\S133HSLLl\OV00040\E1000000V)illl\16d - Wd60:Z S1/41/1141P 69 J iiii"%dhWrio WEI niiii&R ‘4, 70 90dd 133HS 33S 05+ZZ 'VIS 3NI1HO1VW O O O 0 O 7Y M N w QgO (S z 99 6l LI LI L6 S1 9651 0091. 90 91. 26"91 6Ll O O O O 0 0 M N 90dd 133HS 33S 05+ZZ 'VIS 3NI1HO1VW 1021 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 z Z Scale AS SHOWN BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN S. 124TH ST. ALTERNATIVE z co m Z W moo < — Sora 1 Q Q o n U=cN CI OEv > N g 0 0 < 1 °' m 0 23 z m 0 0 0 0 U w 0 d. 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING 6m P'E:OOV11fl,A"90dd HA9ZI. dlV 11\S133HSLL1\(IV000b0\EL000000VNI11\LGd - wdO Z SIRL/ll o1P 1 Vilml&MMPlih WEI di ithila 1 ZOdd l33HS 33S 09+L .VIS 2NI1H31VW (n�Z DpOw '>-% �CCoJ� D'o2Q omoW U ZOdd 122HS 33S 05+L 'V1S 3NI1HOEVW G O O O O 0 1 0 N Z 6621 1291 6921 - OL 81 08 91 00 61 05'61 Oct 61 00 05 L9 15 O O G 0 0 L 0- 0 N 08"£5 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0- + a 0- rn BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN GATEWAY DRIVE ALTERNATIVE U z_ 0) ZW >a wV Cl 0 > co ? OJ - m M rn 6 c *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING b0-PClOOVWII-1.Odd AVM9IV9 OV-LL\S133HSLLl\OV000b0\£L000000VW11%,d - wd9Z1L SL/51)1 o1P 71 Nig mlillifiN119111 A440 I.0dd 133HS 33S 09+L 'b1S 3NIlH31VW 72 COdd 133HS 33S 00+E I- 'VIS 3NI1HOIWl O O O O O [fl d 0 N 66 OZ 00 00 Le 61 OL91 DO 8l 7681 O O O 0 0 d CV 1.0dd 133HS 33S 09+9 'VIS 3N1-1HOELWJ 1061 9061 06 B1 N O D O + 0 0 0 03 co 0 BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN GATEWAY DRIVE ALTERNATIVE 0 0 0 0 U U *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING 6mP El00VWll-ZOdd AVMil iy9 11V-ll\S133HSLLl\OV00040\£L 000000V)U11UFd • wdOE:l 91211110IP Vil9111ANIMPliii WEI ifiria&O Odd 13 3NIlH� dW 338 09+8t. tils 1fOdd 133HS 33S 05+81, 'V.'S 3NI1HOEVW ZOdd 133HS33S Op+£� "VIS 3N1-1H01dW o 2 0 00 00 0000 00 OZ 0 00'00 00 00 0 91 00 d+ 02 00 0 0 0 7 0 M N ZOdd 133HS 33S 00+£1. 'VIS 3Ni-11OIWJ 60 00 0 0 0 M ,M 0 • • i Scale AS SHOWN C 1- U w O • z CL 0 � En wW U -J U Q Q D >- H w ▪ W -(-5‹ ZU w0 J Q W Z O i- za 11- W J Z Q Z_ LL z CO GATEWAY DRIVE ALTERNATIVE co c) moo N O to c0 CC, >oLA-) <mLn 0 0 CI LL 0 0 co 0 0 •O n. *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING omp•E LOOV1 01-EcddAVM31V0 11V-11\S1331-1SLL1\OV00040\E L000000V)IfLLL20d - wd8Ea S L L/L L .IP 73 1 WdYIth Gi 0 0 'Z y1 'S �3s 1�Odd 133HS 33S S �Nl�l-I0lbw 0O+17Z 'VIS ANI1H31VW O O 0 0cm cm' 0 920 £Z N zI 63 63 309E1 tt l7 0 a. LL 0£ •30N W.tf7,»Z 163 " D o Q 0 x a. a W OLti o Y 1.0H �a 0 1 O 0 0 06 Z£ 30A2 09 Lb+1.3 t 09 BRIDGE WITH 4% SUPER ELEVATION *ASSUME 3 OZ Z£ 30A3 01 L0+03 `0093 2' SI AB DEPTH 00 02 3091,1 01 23+61 '5099 N 16 LZ 062 03 94.33 069 LZ OS £3 06£ 0£ 66 £Z OL£ Z£ 6£ £3 £ L6 Z£ 099 3£ 4lb'2£ OSL Z£ 2411 966 0£ SL 03 469 93 £L 03 o 0 0 0 M N 01 4- COdd IR I -IS 3AS 05+81, •V±S 3NIlHOIVW Sbl 93 63 13 N 0 0 N 0 0 rn 0 co 5 z 0 0 0 0 W 0 o z n. 0 W W U -J UQ Q Hd J W -(15‹ LI_0 —J Q W z> o p z z a C W J zQ L CO W GATEWAY DRIVE ALTERNATIVE co mo▪ o �o5 co co N 6 0 O � 0, eft N d V W 0 b.P'CLOOVNf11-40dd AVM9IVD 11V-1115133NS1LL10'V30940AC1W 74 V441 - Wa1.4:1 61/UAL 0IP ��. °0000 POdd 133HS 33S OO+17Z '`d1S 3NI1HO1WW T 0 zW gW OL -1, 00 = A3-13 0056+bZ = V1S )IV3?J8 30Vd0 l0 00 3005 N 0 + ro ✓ 0 N ^ N i N I- w V O > 5 >0 0 W W °0 0 L. 0 01 00 S0 00 0£ 00 b l'00 ZL 91 0091_ 96'91 96 01 Lb'91 0 0 0 N 0 60 Ll N 6£ 61 0 O 0 0 990 £Z o0 o 0 0 0 0 l6 10 + N if1 I� 1S N tOdd 133HS 33S OO+iZ 't�3-N111-101M Cr) 0 BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN GATEWAY DRIVE ALTERNATIVE wpm ffilPi 0 O LL N .Fe 0 -6 0 W 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING 6mp £ 100V W i-S0dd AVMAIVO 11V-U1S139HSLL1\0V3oc60\£ 1000000V)U11UFd - W d£b:1 91.2141010 75 .00 ZOdd TANS 919 09+9 *V_LS 3N1-1H31VW 76 ZOdd 1IIHS 919 09+9 .VIS JNI1HOIWJ o o 0 0 0 d 0 N 0 0 00 91 0091 0091 0091 0091 L0'91 2991 90 61 SL 61 0000 £0 00 91£0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 N 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 + N O + 0 rn 0 0 0 + N 0 0 0- a Scale AS SHOWN BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 48TH AVE. S. ALTERNATIVE 0 0 v 0 6 m 0 c w 0 -o 0_ F-; u *ENGINEERING*STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING _ J 6mp'£LOOvNfll-;odd H196 11V-ll\S133HSLLL\OVOOOh0\EL000000VW11\11:d - we£PoL 61/Z111101P COdd 133HS 33S 00+Z1. 'VIS 3NI1HO1VW 1.Odd 133HS 33S 09+9 'VIS 3NI1HO1WW WEI ifilida £Odd 133HS 33S 00+ZI- '`d1S 3NI1H3IWJ 0 0 0 0 o 0 OL 61 w z F 66 61 06 6 SS 81 0081 00 91 00 81 00"8 00 2 00 91 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 N I.Odd 133HS 33S 09+9 'VIS 3N11HO1VW 0 00 21 00 81 0 N 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 + 0 oo + 0 0 0 • O 0 0 Scale AS SHOWN Ki„ i nat. i ao„i 0 w 0 0 w 0 0 u_ 0 LL co m ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 48TH AVE. S. ALTERNATIVE U Z c 10 0 w a *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING 6 lPC 1OOV)if.L-ZOdd H1134 11V-11\S133HSLLAOV00040\£1.000000VWll\1Fd- 1.1.1eZEO1 S1/ZMI. 0IP 77 'if :mW19o di a &Gi frOdd 133HS 33S O +LL '` IS 3NI1H31VW Odd 133HS 33S 00+Z1 'VIS 3NI1H31VW iOdd 133HS 33S 09+LL 'VIS 3NI1HOIVIN O 0 O O O 0 d 0 N O 0 0000 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 L6 6 12 61 0 661 06'6 06 6l O O O 0 0 (0 ZOdd 133HS 33S 00+Z I- 'V1S 3N1-1HOIVW 02 61 00 61 M O 0 0 s Scale AS SHOWN BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 48TH AVE. S. ALTERNATIVE U z co cn 111 0m Z W moo Q wm Q C � W ¢ Oa U - CN \00 � jy< O co 0Q *'a o 6 z m 0 0w 0 m 0 0 d v w 0` *ENGINEERING*STREETS *WATER *SEWER PARKS *BUILDING MPC l00VNl11-EOdd -194 11V-ll\S133HSLLl\0V000601E1000000V0101\1Gd -we4E,0l SL/ZL/IL 0IP 78 1 iiiimliffiM1916 niii&O EOddlDAHS 3JS 9Odd 133HS 33S OO+EZ 'V1S 3NI1HOIVW 0 0 0 0 0ry 0 09 9£ 30A3 TZ9 Z1I-99 S3A3 t0£ 1£ 30A8 9?78 2' SLAB DEPTH 4£ £Z 33A0 90 9R+Fi 1 S"17-3 00 OZ 30A9 0 DFI!VEWAY LT (FILL 2 5') -. 90 94;+91. .SJA9 00 0£ 900 09 = A313 91 = V1S >173b8 30780, 15 N O BEGIN PEDESTRIAN TRAIL b S'Z£ £9 9£ 9941. 99 12 19 19 91 69 9CO9 99`99 19.09 91 49 of 09 69 19 10 09 94 OZ t0 09 00 OZ 10 09 05+L 'VIS 2NI1H31t/W EOdd l3JHS 33S 05+LL 'VIS 3NIIH3IVW 10 09 N N 0 O N 0 N 0 0 O rn O 0 10 0 0) 04 0 a a 5 3 tn 0 K 0 z° BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 48TH AVE. S. ALTERNATIVE Elo m 0 0 U W 0 01 a a LL [.4 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING bmwE L007W11-40dd 1-1194117-ll\S133HSLLJA0V00040\E1000000V1111\1Fd- we6£Al S1,21./1.1.IP 79 VitmlIMMI916 Aiwa 711/1i4P) O O O O p o D N 7 N O t7Odd 13131 -IS 33S 00+£Z 'V1S 3NIlH3IVW 1 it 6Z 86`6Z S£ 0£ 99 9Z L6 0£ Ll bZ 8b LE £E ZZ 0 co+ N 0 0 u9 M 61 22 O O 0 0 O O t7Odd 133HS 33S 00+£Z "VIS 3NI1HOLW'J 80 O z 0 0 BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 48TH AVE. S. ALTERNATIVE 0 z th Zw < wV o Q VI 04 m in 0) moo a,00) CO 0 CC rn > 0 in .0 CN 0, C O o z w 0 0 a 0 *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING .' 6MP'£LOOVW71-90dd 11.1187 Ll4'-.E149133H611a\4V000b0\£L000000YW1lUFd- wdZZ l 6I/010 "IP Appendix B — Truck Access Routes P:ItITUKA00000013f0SOOINFOk0670R6porfs8VSF Intermodal Access Screening summary 2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201649 81 82 ?[•INDI W iIq lifmliMM1916 0 Z 0 W W J 1 • 15 4,4 11 Scale AS SHOW LINN:i- rim in*Kium:alma *Ke 0 0 U 1N * TREETS *WATER * WER *PA - K *131 IL, IN 0 a OmPY31110H )IOO?J1 S 3AV H1134\seln02:1 Aom1\S110IHX3\11\OV=0040\E 100W00V W11NFd - we l4" l l Sl/ZZ/01. qP 83 ViidliWride Wel oih&O 0 0 • UTE: FREEWAY TO BNSF YARD (0.9 MILE, • UTE: BNSF YARD TO FREEWAY (0.9 MILE, 1 • :N F INTERNATIONAL FA ILITY A E r.• TIT •N 'TUAL DE I N.% Ifi 3 LL cLL • a >- < (cri Wu. 0 < 1— 0 z 00 ZUJ >•:( 0 DO >0 <0 0< 0 z SAL 9 0 0 w 2 4 [c11:141 l 1:1c1/1114 4_44.121/M4_32:14,14:12411;1.1--LAP1111111LcZ 0 ainoa Nona' UO AVNIDIVO Narul \S11£111 -1X3 OV0001,0\Cl000mov>inivvd 6C /zzto ap 84 11011(iMIiyTII: 1.yT:rlhMl'1i WEI ilii:O i 0 Z • UTE: FREEWAY TO BNSF YARD 1.3 MILE, •UT : BNSF YARD TO FREEWAY 1.3 MILE, 1 • .9t ll :N F INTERNATIONAL FACILITY A E P. • 1 of o 00 ZW >< wv 0 o >0 <0 ❑Q z 0 0 .0' 3 U w a 24 Leif 14413L'c12-�T711 ' Y4_:L1:i3211:1 :ILa 1I LleZ 0 a` 6MP.31f1O8 NOflal DAV H1bZL S\selno2l Nowl\S119IHXD\ll\OVO0040\£ 1000000VNf11\1G d' we44 L L 5 l/ZUOL AP 85 l 86 NOT TO SCALE 0 Z w w J ROUTE: FREEWAY TO BNSF YARD (1.1 MILE) ROUTE. BNSF YARD TO FREEWAY (1 1 MILE) TRAFFIC SIGNAL I PM Ian. EN • MN H 0 w O a Z a0 �( ww 0 U -� Q a w U U Z �O J Z > Oi Qz Z E LU W J Z Q Z_ LL Z 00 F- 1 - (N.1 NN c 0 z co Lo.) CO o 0 g8o rn of a c WU ¢ orn r CN > o o 0 Q0 > a al z z m Q. 00 ZW Q O m 0 ami U 0 0 Q 0 S *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING rim!, a1flO2J NO11211 IS FUEL l S\solooa Aoral\S1191HX3LL1\OV000b0\E1000000VNf11\1\-d • LE£9-ll 91./ZZ/0 cIP NOT TO SCALE 0 Z W W J ROUTE: FREEWAY TO BNSF YARD (1.4 MILE) ROUTE: BNSF YARD TO FREEWAY (1.4 MILE) 11 TRAFFIC SIGNAL BNSF INTERNATIONAL FACILITY ACCESS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN N 0 0 0 E,; * ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *SEWER *PARKS *BUILDING 6h\P31fON NOfL1 AVM 11,1Oda V\safnoa Aotil\S1191 HX3\11\O V00040\E L00000OV)Ull\ vd ' coon: t l S 11Z/Ol CIP 8/ 88 Appendix C -- Roadway Cost Estimate Back-up P:ItITUKA0000001310600tNF00670F1aporisIEWSF Intermodal Access Screening summary _2016-1128.docx City of Tukwila Alternative Screening Analysis BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 201655 89 90 TESC and Landscaping 53-55 TESC $53,200.00 56-60 Plantings $105,000.00 61-62 Irrigation $0.00 TESC and Landscaping Subtotal $158,200.00 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Access Study Planning Level Cost Estimate Alternate: Location: Length: Description: Assumptions: Airport Way S Airport Way S to BNSF Intermodal Facility 1800' Alternative uses Airport Way S to northern end of BNSF yard. CI DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES IND. Date: Prepared by: Checked by: 11/28/16 MLF See alternative exhibit Existing Widths: Pavement Varies 40' to 52' Sidewalk 0 Right -of -Way Varies 60' to 80' Proposed Widths: Pavement 44' Sidewalk 6' both sides Right -of -Way 67' Preparation 1 1 Structures 1 Mobilization $772,900.00 48-51 Retaining Walls $71,860.00 2-4 Preparation Items $164,500.00 52 Bridge Structure $6,160,000.00 5-12 Removal Items $82,000.00 Structure Subtotal $6,231,860.00 Preparation Subtotal $1,019,400.00 Grading 13-14 Roadway Grading 15-18 Roadway Foundation 19-24 Utility Excavation Grading Subtotal $112,548.00 $150,275.00 $20,400.00 $283,223.00 Storm Drainage 25-36 Conveyance System 37 Culvert/Stream Crossing 38 Detention/Water Quality Facility Storm Drainage Subtotal $188,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $188,500.00 [ Traffic I I 63-71 Markings and Signing $5,884.00 72-75 Guardrail/Handrail $0.00 76-80 Traffic Signal System $170,000 00 81-83 Illumination System $75,000.00 84-89 Traffic Control $50,000.00 Traffic Subtotal $300,884.00 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement 39-42 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement $146,850.00 HMA Subtotal $146,850.00 Concrete 43-44 Sidewalks and Driveways $100,345.00 45-46 Curbs and Gutters $64,500.00 47 Concrete Roadway $0.00 Concrete Subtotal $164,845.00 Other Items 90-91 Utility Relocates $0.00 92-94 Misc. Construction $22,200.00 Other Items Subtotal $22,200.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL (a) 30% $8,515,962 $2,554,790 $11,070,752 DESIGN ENGINEERING 18% $1,992,740 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 12% $1,328,500 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 5% $553.540 ENGR. AND ADMIN. SUBTOTAL (b) $3,874,780 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 5% $553,540 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION 5% $553,540 ENVIRONMENTAL SUBTOTAL (c) $1,107,080 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (a+b+c) $16,050,000 ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY $0 ROADWAY SUBTOTAL $16,050,000 MARKET CONTIGENCY 20% $3,210,000 ROADWAY TOTAL (d) 519.260.000 RAILROAD IMPROVEMENTS RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY RAILROAD SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY RAILROAD TOTAL (e) 20% $65,000,000 $10,000,000 $75,000,000 $15.000.000 $90.000.000 TOTAL PROJECT COST (d+e) (Year 2016) $109,300,000 Page 1 of 1 P:\t\TUKAO00000liiun"itiRNFCLu"5uuelgn•.7ocsluvz.o-sa..' ies'.01_BNSF Access Cost Est Airport.xls Printed: 11/25816 91 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Access Study Planning Level Cost Estimate Alternate: Location: Length: Description: Assumptions: South 112th Street East Marginal Way to BNSF Internodal Facility 1750' Alternative uses utility corridor and ties into the northern half of BNSF yard D DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC. Date: Prepared by: Checked by: 11/28/16 MLF see alternative exhibit Existing Widths: Proposed Widths: Pavement Varies 40' to 52' Pavement 44' Preparation 1 1 Mobilization 2-4 Preparation Items 5-12 Removal Items Preparation Subtotal Sidewalk 0 Sidewalk 6' both sides Right -of -Way Varies 60' to 80' Right -of -Way 67' Structures $276,700.00 49-52 Retaining Walls $91,600.00 53 Bridge Structure $30,450.00 $398,750.00 Grading 13-15 Roadway Grading 16-19 Roadway Foundation 20-25 Utility Excavation Grading Subtotal $96,889.00 $122,325.00 $16,640.00 Structure Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TESC and Landscaping 1 54-56 TESC $46,400.00 57-61 Plantings $84,890.00 62-63 irrigation $32,400.00 TESC and Landscaping Subtotal $163,690.00 $235,854.00 ( Traffic Storm Drainage 1 64-72 Markings and Signing $5,084.00 26-37 Conveyance System $149,850.00 73-76 Guardrail/Handrail $0.00 38 Culvert/Stream Crossing $0.00 77-81 Traffic Signal System $170,000.00 39 Detention/Water Quality Facility $1,500,000.00 82-84 Illumination System $150,000.00 Storm Drainage Subtotal $1,649,850.00 85-90 Traffic Control $30.000.00 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement 40-43 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement $118,800.00 HMA Subtotal $118,800.00 Concrete 44-45 Sidewalks and Driveways $81,690.00 46-47 Curbs and Gutters $52,500.00 48 Concrete Roadway $0.00 Concrete Subtotal $134,190 00 Traffic Subtotal $355,084.00 Other Items 1 91-92 Utility Relocates $4,000,000.00 93-95 Misc. Construction $29,000.00 Other Items Subtotal $4,029,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 30% $7,085,218.00 $2.125.570.00 $9,210,788.00 DESIGN ENGINEERING 18% $1,657,950.00 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 12% $1,105,300.00 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 5% $460.540.00 ENGR. AND ADMIN. SUBTOTAL $3,223,790.00 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 10% $921,080.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION 5% $460.540.00 ENVIRONMENTAL SUBTOTAL $1,381,620.00 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (a+b+c) ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY ROADWAY SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY ROADWAY TOTAL (d) 20% $13,820,000 $4.000.000 $17,820,000 $3,560,000 $21,380.000 RAILROAD IMPROVEMENTS RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY RAILROAD SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY RAILROAD TOTAL (el 20% $53,000,000 $3,700.000 $56,700,000 $11.340.000 $68.040,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST (d+e) (Year 2016) $89,400,000 92 P:\t\TUKA00000013\06001N=D10e5DOesign❑ 1E53F stinrates'.CO BNSF Access Cost Est 112th.xls Page 1 of 1 Printed: 11/2516 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Access Study Planning Level Cost Estimate Alternate: Location: Length: Description: Assumptions: S 124th Street Interurban Avenue S to BNSF Intermodal Facility 3400' CI DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES NC. Date: Prepared by: Checked by: 11/28/16 MLF Alternative uses 42nd Avenue S, over Duwarnish River, right on S 124th Street, and into the existing BNSF yard access. Improvements along the existing route must be made, i.e. pavement rehabilitation, replacement of bridge over Dtxwamish River. See alternative exhibit Existing Widths: Proposed Widths: Pavement Varies 40' to 52' Pavement 44' Preparation 1 Mobilization 2-4 Preparation Items 5-12 Removal Items Preparation Subtotal $937,800.00 $154,400.00 $121,228.00 $1,213,428.00 Grading 13-14 Roadway Grading 15-17 Roadway Foundation 18-23 Utility Excavation Grading Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Storm Drainage 24-35 Conveyance System 36 Culvert/Stream Crossing 37 Detention/Water Quality Facility Storm Drainage Subtotal $65,200.00 $0.00 $75,000.00 $140,200.00 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement 38-41 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement $311,500.00 HMA Subtotal $311,500.00 Concrete 42-43 Sidewalks and Driveways 44-45 Curbs and Gutters 46 Concrete Roadway Concrete Subtotal $44,000.00 $66,300.00 $0.00 $110,300.00 Sidewalk 0 Sidewalk 6' both sides Right -of -Way Varies 60' to 80' Right -of -Way 67' Structures 47-52 Retaining Walls 53 Bridge Structure $4,811,400.00 $2,745,600.00 Structure Subtotal $7,557,000.00 TESC and Landscaping 54-56 TESC 57-61 Plantings 62-63 Irrigation TESC and Landscaping Subtotal $256,200.00 $86,860.00 $13,500.00 $356,560.00 Traffic 64-72 73-76 77-81 82-84 85-90 Markings and Signing Guardrail/Handrail Traffic Signal System Illumination System Traffic Control Traffic Subtotal $17,680.00 $73,500.00 $180,000.00 $125,000.00 $250,000.00 $646,180.00 Other Items 91-92 Utility Relocates 93-95 Misc. Construction Other Items Subtotal CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 30% $100,000.00 $33,200.00 DESIGN ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PROJECT ADMINISTRATION ENGR. AND ADMIN. SUBTOTAL 18% 12% 5% $133,200.00 $10,468,368 00 $3.140.520.00 $13,608,888.00 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 10% ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION 10% ENVIRONMENTAL SUBTOTAL $2,449,600.00 $1,633,070.00 $680.450.00 $4,763,120.00 $1,360,890.00 $1.360.890.00 $2,721,780.00 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (a+b+c) ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY ROADWAY SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY ROADWAY TOTAL (di 20% $21,090,000 $3.000.000 $24,090,000 $4,820.000 528.910.000 RAILROAD IMPROVEMENTS RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY RAILROAD SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY RAILROAD TOTAL (e) 20% so $0 So $0 So TOTAL PROJECT COST (d+e) (Year 2016) $28,900,000 Page 1 of 1 \t\TUKA00000013%.06NINFMAISCIDes:gnCwcslos,,-EroosesiC3_BNSF Access Cost Est 124th.xls Printed: 11 /2 $12,510,000 $6,900.000 $19,410,000 $3.880.000 823.290.000 1 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Access Study Planning Level Cost Estimate DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES'"°- Alternate: Gateway Drive - North Leg Date: 11/28/16 Location: Interurban Avenue S to BNSF Intermodal Facility Prepared by: MLF Length: 2700' Checked by: Description: Alternative uses north leg of Gateway Drive, goes between the two Boeing Credit Union Building, over Duwamish River, and into the existing BNSF yard access. Assumptions: See altema8ve exhibit Existing Widths: Pavement Varies 40' to 52' Proposed Widths: Pavement 44' Sidewalk 0 Sidewalk 6' both sides Right -of -Way Varies 60' to 80' Right -of -Way 67' Preparation 1 Structures 1 Mobilization $567,600.00 52-57 Retaining Walls $245,250.00 2-4 Preparation Items $115,000.00 58 Bridge Structure $2.481.600.00 5-12 Removal Items $50,342.00 Structure Subtotal $2,726,850.00 Preparation Subtotal $732,942.00 1 TESC and Landscaping 1 Grading 1 59-61 TESC $256,200.00 13-14 Roadway Grading $28,995.00 62-66 Plantings $156,720.00 15-19 Roadway Foundation $263,004.00 67-68 Irrigation $52,380.00 20-25 Utility Excavation $4,960.00 TESC and Landscaping Subtotal $465,300.00 Grading Subtotal $296,959.00 Storm Drainage 26-37 Conveyance System 38 Culvert/Stream Crossing 39 Detention/Water Quality Facility Storm Drainage Subtotal $62,200.00 $0.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,062,200.00 Traffic 1 1 69-77 Markings and Signing $13,040.00 78-81 Guardrail/Handrail $73,500.00 82-86 Traffic Signal System $170,000.00 87-89 Illumination System $247,000.00 90-95 Traffic Control $100 000.00 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement 40-46 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement $207,675.00 HMA Subtotal $207,675 00 Concrete I 47-48 Sidewalks and Driveways $119,145.00 49-50 Curbs and Gutters $66,300.00 51 Concrete Roadway $0.00 Concrete Subtotal $185,445.00 94 P:\t\TUKA0000001�wau, iirruu aau ;� Traffic Subtotal $603,540.00 Other Items 1 96-97 Utility Relocates $100,000.00 98-100 Misc. Construction $34,600.00 Other Items Subtotal $134,600.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $6,415,511.00 CONTINGENCY 30% $1.924.660.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $8,340,171.00 DESIGN ENGINEERING 18% $1,501,240.00 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 12% $1,000,830.00 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 5% $417,010 00 ENGR. AND ADMIN. SUBTOTAL $2,919,080.00 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 10% $834,020.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION 5% $417,010.00 ENVIRONMENTAL SUBTOTAL $1,251,030.00 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (a+b+c) ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY ROADWAY SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY ROADWAY TOTAL (d) 20% RAILROAD IMPROVEMENTS RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY RAILROAD SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY RAILROAD TOTAL (e) 20% 80 80 80 $0 80 TOTAL PROJECT COST (d+e) (Year 2016) $23,300,000 Page 1 of 1 aiimbI eet_BNSF Access Cost Est Gateway.xls Printed: 11/2 ;m' 6 City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Access Study Planning Level Cost Estimate Alternate: Location: Length: Description: Assumptions: 48th Avenue South Interurban Avenue S to BNSF Intermodal Facility 2600' CI DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. Date: Prepared by: Checked by: 11/28/16 MLF Alternative uses 48th Avenue S, over Duwamish River, and ties into the southern end of BNSF yard See alternative exhibit Existing Widths: Pavement Varies 40' to 52' Proposed Widths: Pavement 44' [ Preparation 1 Mobilization 2-4 Preparation Items 5-12 Removal Items Preparation Subtotal $505,500.00 $90,600.00 $71,671.00 $667,771.00 Grading 13-14 Roadway Grading 15-22 Roadway Foundation 23-28 Utility Excavation Grading Subtotal $950.00 $110,341.00 $23,760.00 $135,051.00 Storm Drainage 29-40 Conveyance System 41 Culvert/Stream Crossing 42 Detention/Water Quality Facility Storm Drainage Subtotal $201,800.00 $0.00 $750,000.00 $951,800.00 [ Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement 1 43-49 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement HMA Subtotal $164,065.00 $164,065.00 [ Concrete 50-51 Sidewalks and Driveways 52-53 Curbs and Gutters 54 Concrete Roadway Concrete Subtotal $129,400.00 $65,850.00 $0.00 $195,250.00 Sidewalk 0 Sidewalk 6' both sides Right -of -Way Varies 60' to 80' Right -of -Way 67' Structures 55-59 Retaining Walls 60 Bridge Structure $115,250.00 $2,323,200.00 Structure Subtotal $2,438,450.00 TESC and Landscaping 61-63 TESC 64-68 Plantings 69-70 Irrigation TESC and Landscaping Subtotal $256,400.00 $136,820.00 $44,280.00 $437,500.00 [ Traffic 71-79 80-83 84-88 89-91 92-97 Markings and Signing Guardrail/Handrail Traffic Signal System Illumination System Traffic Control Traffic Subtotal $7,844.00 $94,000.00 $180,000.00 $279,000.00 $50,000.00 $610,844.00 Other Items 98-99 Utility Relocates 100-102 Misc. Construction Other Items Subtotal CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 30% $206,000.00 $18,200.00 DESIGN ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PROJECT ADMINISTRATION ENGR. AND ADMIN. SUBTOTAL 18% 12% 5% ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 10% ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION 5% ENVIRONMENTAL SUBTOTAL $224,200 00 $5,824,931.00 $1,747,480.00 $7,572,411.00 $1,363,040.00 $908,690.00 $378,630 00 $2,650,360.00 $757,250 00 $378,630.00 $1,135,880.00 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (a+b+c) ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY ROADWAY SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY ROADWAY TOTAL (d) 20% $11,360,000 $1,900,000 $13,260,000 $2.650.000 815,910,000 RAILROAD IMPROVEMENTS RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY RAILROAD SUBTOTAL MARKET CONTIGENCY RAILROAD TOTAL (e) 20% $3,700,000 $0 $3,700,000 $740,000 $4.440.000 TOTAL PROJECT COST (d+e) (Year 2016) $20,400,000 Page 1 of 1 P:\t\TUKA00000013\0600INFO\uo uuesiyuoucs0653E5nmrae.EOE_BNSF Access Cost Est 48th.xls Printed: 11/2(116 95 96 BNSF RAILWAY INTERMODAL FACILITY ACCESS STUDY ALTERNATIVE SCREENING ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for: City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98005 Prepared by: David Evans and Associates, Inc. 14432 SE Eastgate Way Bellevue, WA 98007 November 28, 2016 61 97 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Alternative Screening Analysis Report for the City of Tukwila was prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. to evaluate alternative access to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway intermodal facility in Tukwila, Washington. This facility is also known as South Seattle Yard. BNSF Railway also sponsored this study. The existing access to the intermodal facility uses 42nd Avenue S and 5 124th Street. 5 124th Street is also a residential collector street serving the community of Allentown. Several residential homes with driveways are located on 5 124th Street, as is the Tukwila Community Center which houses an aquatic center, meeting rooms, classes and activities for all ages, and playground and ball fields. This study did not create new alternatives but used alternatives that were developed by previous studies. A total of five alternatives were studied: Airport Way 5, 5 112th Street, 5 124th Street, Gateway Drive — North Leg, and 48th Avenue S. Several desktop researches were performed as part of this study. These researches included critical and sensitive areas, fish and wildlife, water resources, hazardous materials, geological and soils, and cultural and historical resources. A scored screening matrix was developed collaboratively between the City of Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. The matrix was presented to Tukwila City Council as well as to the public for their feedback on the screening matrix criteria. The public was allowed to provide feedback via an on-line open house and an in-person open house. Representatives from Tukwila, BNSF Railway, and David Evans and Associates, Inc. met to score each alternative using a numerical scoring system from 1 to 9. The score for each criteria was added, and the lowest score is the preferred alternative. Based on the scoring result, the 48th Avenue 5 alternative is the preferred alternative. P:+n rurta0000ao 13I05DOINFOIP67O RoporrskBNSF lnlormodaj Amiss Scroonlnp summon_ 217» 6- r 1 A6, docx City of Tukwila 1 Alternative Screening Analysis 98 BNSF Intermodal Facility Access November 28, 2016 62 Figure 1 shows the project study area. The following provides a description for each alternative. Figure 1— Project Study Area Gateway Drive Extension Alternative 4803 Avenues 5 • Extension Alternative P;111TUKA0000001310600JNF01O670Raports!BNSF 1ntermoda1 Recess Screening sumrmary_2016.112i.decx City of Tukwila BNSF Intermodal Facility Access 3 Alternative Screening Analysis November 28, 2016 63 99 100 Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary BNSF Access Study DRAFT — September 5, 2017 Background In 2016, the Tukwila community provided input on the screening criteria that was used to develop the BNSF Access Study report. The City identified a preferred alternative route and shared it with the community at an open house on August 17, 2017. Summary The City of Tukwila hosted an in-person open house at the Tukwila Community Center on August 17, 2017. The in-person house accompanied an online open house, which included the same information as the in-person open house and was available from August 15 - 28, 2017. Notifications The project team advertised the in-person and online open houses in early August 2017. Notifications included the following: • Postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods • Emails to the City's project listsery o Listsery includes community members, business and property owners, other interested parties • Flier emailed as attachment to Allentown and Duwamish neighborhood listservs by neighborhood leaders • Facebook and Twitter posts on the City's social media accounts Attendance and visitor statistics • In-person open house attendance: 42 • In-person comment forms completed: 20 • Online open house visitors: 32 • Online surveys completed: 12 • Overall number of participants: 74 Engagement Methods In -Person Open House The City gathered shared information about the preferred alternative and other considered alternatives during an open house at the Tukwila Community Center on August 17, 2017, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Participants viewed informational boards that described the project purpose, schedule, alternative and preferred routes, screening criteria and environmental process. Project staff were on hand to answer questions. Participants contributed comments via comment cards. Comments received at the open house are shown in Appendix 1 and summarized below. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 64 101 In-person open house participants give feedback on comment cards. Online Open House In order to reach Tukwila businesses and residents who were unable to attend the in-person open house, the City advertised an online open house, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, starting August 15 and ending August 28. The online open house included the same information as at the in- person open house and a survey that gathered specific feedback in a similar fashion to the comment boxes at the in-person open house. Comments received through the online open house are shown in Appendices 2 and summarized below. Feedback Overview Several themes emerged from the input received through 32 comments and surveys: • Those who supported the preferred alternative (15) stated a number of reasons for their support, including moving the truck route to a commercial street and away from residences, access/proximity to 1-5 and current residential impacts on 124th. • All residents who said they live along or near the current access route who participated (4) supported moving the truck access route to another street. • Those who opposed the preferred alternative (4) stated increased traffic, business impacts and residential impacts as reasons for their opposition. • Several participants urged the City to study or investigate cost (4) and traffic (3). Several participants also expressed interest in potential environmental impacts (3). Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary 102 DRAFT 65 Next Steps All feedback presented here is being provided to the project team for consideration. The study and proposed route will be presented to City Council in the fall of 2017. One participant requested specific follow up regarding business impacts on 48th Ave S: Quinn Closson, 360-607-8178, qclosson@pape.com. Appendices 1. Comments gathered at in-person open house 2. Online comments 3. Notifications Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 66 103 Appendix 1: Comments Gathered at In-person Open House Note: comments are verbatim as written. Commenters were asked if they live, work or visit Tukwila. Live Work Visit Name Email Comment (verbatim) x Anything 48th Ave S. Phillip Camball except Minimum public $, maximum private funding. x I prefer the 48th Ave S option as the least impactful to residential properties in Allentown and Duwamish. Angela Steel This option keeps semis on existing truck routes w/out creating new roads through environmentally critical areas or private property. *Also need noise wall along edge of railyard. My first choice BNSF move out completely. Second choice I [unknown] [unknown] prefer 48th Ave S. Build wall to control noise and shaking control. x Thanks for all the work that has been done on this. The grid was particularly helpful - very concrete information and easy to understand. The Mary Fertakis [unknown] original study in 1990 shows that the 48th st option was the least expensive and made the most sense. It is the same in 2017. Seems pretty clear that this is still the direction to go. x x David Shumate The 48th Ave and Bridge looks like the best one! x x I think the preferred 48th ave Sean Albert south route is by far the best alternative!! Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary 104 DRAFT 67 x Patty Cokus I agree wholeheartedly with the preffered study route where it impacts all identified impact criteria the least and is the least expensive. Thank you for working on this and advocating for community input and gathering feedback. The preferred route makes the most sense for all. x [Illegible] [unknown] I think the preferred option makes the most sense of those presented. It takes the traffic completely off residential streets and on to a commercial street that already accomodates semi - truck traffic. x Lucia Nilo I hope this project gets look at seriously as I really enjoy my home at 124th - but the vibration of the trucks in and out 24-7 is really bad and nuisance. It shakes our house especially when sleeping - the NO -Build option: S 124th should not be an option. x Wilfredo Nilo We live by 124th ave which is active for semi -trucker. Since we moved here from September 2016 we felt a massive vibration everytime those truckets pass by. We live in a brand new home and it created major cracks in aour garage. We worried whats gonna happen next. x Oscar Uceda We would like to support the prefer alternative for the trucks route coming in and out of the BNSF Railroad Yard facility in Allentown. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 68 105 x x Becky [Illegible] Concern the increase in traffic from now and 20 years down the road on the 48th ave purposal. What effects it will have on the businesses on 48th (widening roads etc) Residents being impacted by not being able to get access to the businesses they already go to. x Morgan Llewellyn I'm wonderng how the project will be funded particularly in light of the right away acquisitions required by the preferred route. It appears the northern route would have the least impact on residential AND commercial businesses. x Todd Jones I stronly oppose Gateway Drive option and 124th st options. I do like the 48th st option or others to the north. x Hanice Ludington My preference is Airport Way s x [Illegible] [Illegible] The road should go out the north end. I live on 51st (across the street from the flat bed trucks, and am concerned about where the railroad will put the road inside this yard. Will trucks have to be removed and trailers [illegible]? And if so, where will they go? It is close to our homes, your moving one road to another. x Linda McLeod No on Gateway Dr. Divides BECU campuses, has many employees + customers x [unknown] [unknown] Airport SO. (BEST) [sic] Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary 106 DRAFT 69 x I live in 122nd st. I hope the 124th s st. would be closed as enterence of BNSF or trucks facility. The impact to our Edna home and neighborhood is Derr[illegible] terrible, the house vibrates each time; lots of noise; and traffic gets crowded. 48th st is great alternative for the BNSB enterence. Steven We'd like to see a traffic impact study done on inerurban and exit 156 off 1-5. Please go to fife and see the issues they have and avoid that happening to us. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 70 107 Appendix 2: Comments from Online Open House Note: comments are verbatim as written. Comment 1. Will all trucks no longer use 124th st ? 2. Will there be entry and exit capability from 50th PL S/129th street? we must have the capability to enter and exit from 50th PL S/129th street. Please make sure this option available. Thanks for your consideration How much will this cost? What about an option to improve the 42nd st. bridge by the community center and do some mitigation on the streets that the trucks drive down, such as widening the shoulders of the street, side walks and maybe even some sort of sound barrier? How is this project prioritized compared to needs in other neighborhoods such as sidewalks and road repair? I am an employee of BECU and believe that the 48th Ave So. preferred option is by far the best choice. Not only from a cost perspective but also from a life safety, employee/member environment and the disruption of multiple businesses/residential and land/building value standpoint. The 48th Ave So. option already houses a street with truck yard access and would be a much easier way to execute on this initiative. While I know this still impacts some, it is the reasonable choice and should be adopted. I am not only a Tukwila resident but also a Tukwila business owner that would be greatly affected by the "preferred" route of 48th AVE S. The overall impact on the businesses along this route would be devastating. People are already frustrated with the current amount of big trucks coming along 48th. We are already lacking suitable gas stations in Tukwila. Please don't make them impossible to get to. Tukwila is a growing city and the north side (Airport way) of it is already industrial. Interurban Ave is an incredibly popular thoroughfare for many people going south/north and the 2 gas stations on 48th Ave services more than half of those people. Please reconsider 112th or Airport way as the better alternative that will impact our growing city the least amount. Thank you. I am very happy that the city is analyzing other options for the truck route into the BNSF yard. The current route is not sustainable. My family prefers the 48th Av S option since it uses an existing commercial street and is least impactful to residential communities and the environment. I would like you to heavily factor in the environmental impacts the other two northerly options would have on wetlands and existing greenspaces.Will the Airport Way option impede future Light rail/Sounder station location planning efforts? How will the different entrance options impact yard operations? Currently, the BNSF yard is very noisy 24/7 with back up beepers. Will these operations shift or diminish with the varying options? Can the city proceed with pursuing the noise wall installation along the railyard boundary? I think this will make a significant improvement to the quality of life in Duwamish and Allentown. thank you I represent The Pape' Group, Inc. who owns the Ditch Witch dealership on 48th Ave, South. I understand there will be significant traffic impact during construction. I don't think we're overly concerned about that. However, I'd like a little more information on the traffic study or estimates on additional traffic impact on 48th Ave. South after completion of the project. Also, will there be any improvements done to the 48th Ave road itself? Finally, is there something I'm missing that you think we should be concerned about as a business right on 48th Ave? Thanks, Quinn Closson 360-607-8178 qclosson@pape.com Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary 108 DRAFT 71 !wish that this 124th St. access be change to a different access ASAP because we moved here in a new home development last year 2016 of Sept. which we are not aware about this 124th St. right beside our house is the major access for truckers. We encountered 24-7 of a massive vibration like an earthquake multiple times everyday and we felt scary that our house may collapse one of this day. So far we had a multiple long cracks in our garage and hopefully will not affect the foundation. We live right by the stop sign where those truckers heading out from BNSF gate and also for coming in. That really distract us everyday. There's a time when some of the truck driver lost their focus on the stop sign especially in the evening and they made an emergency brakes and it shakes the ground so bad and it vibrates our house also. 1 Believe that 48th Ave S is the best alternatives route for the truckers. !work at BECU. The Gateway alternative would have a negative impact on our members who come into our Tukwila Financial Center to conduct their personal business (primarily retail banking, trust services, and investment services). We are about to engage on a Gateway campus upgrade and a truck route cutting through the middle of it would have a negative impact on our employee experience and may have a negative impact on our ability to recruit and retain employees. Given the existing land use abutting most of your preferred alternative (gas stations, commercial, etc.). 1 can see the potential noise downside for a hotel (but it's already next To 1-5 and a busy off ramp so marginal impact seems moderate). I would like to avoid having another bridge over the river and prefer this option: S 112th Street Thank you. Thank you for considering all options and explaining the reasoning. What timeframe are you looking at for construction of the new bridge and roadway. What impact will there be on the existing Interurban Bike/Walking Trail both during construction and upon completion. Will traffic studies be done to work on minimalizing impact at the intersection for traffic on Interurban and from the off ramp on 15? This route makes the most sense as it is a quick, direct route off of 1-5, drives through a commercial area only and does not affect the public's experience of their greenspace, except for a small segment of the bike trail. 1 fully support this preferred route. What are the costs? How it will be funded? Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 72 109 Appendix 3: Notifications Social media City of Tukwila - Government August 9 al 3. 4pm k� Join us for a BNSF Access Study Project Open House on August 17, 2017 The City of Tukwila has identified 48th Ave as the preferred route to access the BNSF Railway Intermodal Facility in Allentown_ Before the mute is formally decided_ we're holding an Open House and online foram to talk to you about the route that we selected based on the criteria you helped us shape. BNSF Access Study Project Open House Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. Tukwila Community Center 2424 42nd Ave S, Tukwila. WA 98160 Can't snake it to the open house? Share your thoughts onlinel Now' through. August 20, 2017. you can share your thoughts at https:„TuKBNSFAccess.Participate.Online All information from the Open House will be online. Translation options are available. Email us at AccessStudyrtukwilawa.gov or call 206-433-0179 with any questions, CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF Access Study Project dir Like Ci 3 3 shares • Comment Tina" OIllabodo her IAI ie5hlia 4M4 Nee 5.5. Lige prekilell mot 4o micro it* Mr *Awry hrorrmre l Rardnr F n @.b+ t TWO w Weimar award, .rliblamew.Open e4wae **I w ro-w..rd caw ro.J alto= dm, *wt. SW ow baud on the o.enno LLS snips Lad MilirNetil 6w tier asiw+ed rsri►ee rest; Ogriallovta ▪ Asmoil fir,1 4 s la P Rep I oes. Cd..twpwryr WNW bili•int!Awe Sm T1 WAIII'Le kievf pmrti er triml*IOW 44eprlinvedohnrnafMei e..d s!e rookrootreotol poem l.eMFywJ+ir Ski wJMs Cimino Mewl Mew [Mrr gh &WW2", ix41 pro CM slime rum ',hcamhh air* Yl l Mica ^ f fiiamNirarTem. 1a>...r Ordmi, ▪ iNbuinl . Awn My ryrw W r m, =waif ire 7rvwFMM. 41-F.•t Mm 11011111110 4 Share Facebook post published August 9, 2017. l Top Comments Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary 110 DRAFT 73 City of Tukwila 0 @ CityofTukwila r Aug 9 v Join us for a BNSF Access Study Project Open House on August 17, 2017 0 CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF Access Study Project Tweet published August 9, 2017. Postcard TS, Citti of kalndo ili rggtlrlhati 4611 iliN* 5 Rr131{ prt¢1aiwrge mu teamrr tdia 1b4way. 4nearrrloi3at F n11tif iR Aio-ntn.rn 6.1,n/the ra.“0 s ficiaraiii 41,04 Ali e1r iVen airnwo - MIEN PIWILMI !4El& m yaw ahnut the rout. It t iYRinleparcl Waal an Lim moria gnu l os Itolma IIorlem ad twiteme estes 1m welerared alisienfor remise L 119ra6& fhksliiw, Mwusi 17, 3FFLT 534 1300ni Tudoitlia ratitorveary Celled 17t1i# i7rrd Art S.. Tu11wIPi. 'i4+i 91i Ifi6 'Orel #cats -=t sn & V imm aimwt' tial ,pro,iirsrAJ alto4riziOur Forgo m rf+Mrkrarr.7.F1itaA weans, NO iAiwr Nor 'r3RPe1 s oi,N3er lFw!Jrn NON iMIW6h Awls6at .TE, 31717, !nu tela strati rout thwit11! dialer Mill kek.p3. TIi,µFMSFikcrSv +r'wtidprot.el .lint A kr prrrrygran Kra n 010 PIN* * rlatrie __ irlRq Trpry,4,0oi3.1100o4o id hi, ErR611161st Arrei3SI .orerub otionea prim' oil ? -431.0179 CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF Access Study Project The City has identified 48th Ave 5 as the preferred route to access the BNSF yard in Allentown. Before the route is formally decided, we're holding an open house and online forum to talk to you about the route that we selected based on the trite{° you helped us shape. Review and comment on the preferred alternative route: 1. In person Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. Tukwila Community Center 1242442nd Ave S, Tulcwila, WA 98168 Meet project staff, learn about the preferred afternertive route and environmental process, and shore your thoughts. 2. Online Now through August 28, you can share your thoughts online! Visit TukBN5FAccess.Participate.O11line All infarmationfrom the in-person event will be online, Translation options are available. Questions? Email us at AocessStudy@tukwilawa.gov or call 206-433-0179. One side of a postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods. Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary DRAFT 74 111 CITY OF TUKWILA BNSF Access Study Project Public Works Administration 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA S818B Review and comrnent on the preferred alternative route, 48th Ave 5 In person Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Tukwila Community Center Online TukBNSFAccess. Participate.Online Reverse of a postcard sent to the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods. Emails Tukwila BNSF Access Study — Preferred Alternative Outreach Summary 112 DRAFT 75 Tukwila City CouncCommittee of the Whole Minutes June 14, 2021 Page 3 of 5 Based on a question from Councilmember Seal, Vicky Cedsen, Finance Director, indicated a budget amendment will be required to fund the request for consultant services that will come out of the General Fund. Foliowing an inquiry from Council President Kruller, Mr. Golden confirmed the consultants have extensive experience working with agencies to retain fire services within the organization in addition to other options such as contracting for services, annexing to a current agency, and forming Regional Fire Authorities. CONSENSUS EXISTED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTATION SERVICES AND TIMELINE FOR ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY FIRE ADVISORY TASK FORCE. e. An update and Council Consensus on options for BNSF Alternative Access Study. Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Directorprovided an update on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Intermodal Facility Access Study that reviews alternate routes for a new truck traffic route. Staff is seeking Council approval on Options 1 and 2 as outlined in the informational memorandum: (1) To update the David Evans contract to revise previous cost estimates in the report for the amount of $15,000 to $50,000; and (2) To complete an environment impact statement process which will cost approximately $75O.0OOhn$9OO.000.inaddition hzhiring aterm-limited Project WYanagerfor$30O.O0Oforhwoyeara. Councilmember Seal reported the Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee discussed pursuing Option 3 (research and analysis of funding options) whenever feasible. Following a question from Councilmember Hougardy regarding funding sources, Mr. Ponnekanti explained funding sources could include a waste management surcharge for roads and road -related projects, bond issues, use of general funds, American Rescue Plan Act funds, or a combination of the above. Based on a question from Council President Nru||er, Rachel Bianchi, Deputy City Administrator, shared the City has been in communication with Allentown residents and intends to hold a community meeting in the near future. The term -limited Project Manager proposed through Option 2 will also be responsible for interacting with the community. CONSENSUS EXISTED TO PROCEED WITH OPTIONS 1 AND 2 AS OUTLINED IN THE AGENDA DOCUMENTATION. REPORTS a. Mayor Mayor Ekberg shared the Tukwila, City of Opportunity Scholarships were presented to awardees at the virtual Foster High School Awards Night. b. City Council Councilmember Seal reported the Tranand Infrastructure Services Committee forwarded 3 items to the next Regular Meeting Consent Agenda: The Public Works Shops Minkler Restroom Remodel Project, the Public Works Shops Fence and Gates Pject, and Transportation Demand Management Program Regional Mobility Grant Program Award. The Committee also discussed trash pickup and graffiti cleanup and received an update on the Public Works Tenant Improvements project. There will be a page on the City website that will have contacts listed for issues with illegal dumping and graffiti. Councilmember Hougardy attended a Sound Cities Association Women in Leadership meeting today where they discussed the impacts of the pandemic on women. Councilmember Quinn thanked the Council President and Laurel Humohray, Legislative Analyst, for their hard work on the recent Council retreat. He relayed a recent incident in Allentown in which a semi -truck 78 113 City of Tukwila City Council Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee Meeting Minutes July 12, 20215:30 p.m. - Electronic Meeting due to COVID-19 Emergency Councilmembers Present: Verna Seal, Chair, De'Sean Quinn, Thomas McLeod Staff Present: Hari Ponnekanti, Rachel Bianchi, David Cline, Brittany Robinson, Mike Perfetti, Dan Nguyen, Muhammad Musa, Scott Bates, Guests: Laura Moser & Randy Jones, Waste Management; Barbara Combs, resident Chair Seal called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. I. BUSINESSAGENDA There was consensus to move item E to the second order of business. A. Waste Management Service Discussion Committee members and representatives from Waste Management discussed recent customer issues and appropriate protocols for handling issues. Ms. Moser & Mr. Jones invited Councilmembers to contact them directly with future concerns, discussed a forthcoming rerouting process, and indicated they would follow up with the customer service team to learn why differing messages are being shared with residents. Committee Recommendation Discussion only. B. BNSF Alternative Access Study Next Steps Staff presented an update on the BNSF Alternative Access Study Environmental Impact Statement process, including schedule, community engagement' and funding options. Item(s) for follow-up: Plan future discussion around debt capacity. Committee Recommendation Discussion only. C. Resolution: WRIA 9 Watershed Planning 2021-2026 Staff is seekingCouncilapproval of a resolution to adopttheWRIA92021 Update to the Salmon Habitat Plan. Committee Recommendation Unanimous approval. Forward to July26, 2021 Committee of the Whole. 114 T0: City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Mayor's Office - David Cline, City Administrator The City of opportunity, the community of choice Mayor Ekberg Councilmembers FROM: David Cline, City Administrator DATE: July 14, 2021 SUBJECT: City Administrator's Report The City Administrator Report is meant to provide the Council, staff and community an update on the activities of the City and on issues that concern Tukwila. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information about any of the following items. �. Intergovernmental Update • Briefing with King County Public Health: Mayor Ekberg, City Administrator David Cline and Emergency Manager Mindi Mattson participated in a Sound Cities Association briefing with King County Public Health on June 15. • Meetings with Sound Transit Board Members: Mayor Ekberg, City Administrator David Cline, Deputy City Administrator Rachel Bianchi and Business Relations Manager Brandon Miles met with Lynnwood Mayor, Nicola Smith on June 16, King County Councilmember Dave Upthegrove on June 17, Kenmore Mayor, David Baker on June 18 and separate meetings with King County Councilmember Joe McDermott and Auburn Mayor, Nancy Backus on June 28 to discuss Sound Transit projects in Tukwila. • National League of Cities Information Technology and Communications Committee: Mayor Ekberg participated in the National League of Cities Information Technology and Communications Committee meeting on June 22. • Sound Cities Association Mayors Meetings: Mayor Ekberg participated in Sound Cities Association Mayors meetings on June 22 and June 25. • 2021 Pacific Northwest Economic Equity Summit: Mayor Ekberg participated in the 2021 Pacific Northwest Economic Equity Summit jointly sponsored by the Kent, Renton and Seattle Southside Chambers of Commerce on June 23. • ICMA Institute on Race, Equity and Inclusion Learning Exchange: City Administrator David Cline participated in an International County/City Managers Association (ICMA) Institute on Race, Equity and Inclusion Learning Exchange on June 29. Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 115 City Administrator's Report July 14, 2021 Page 2 11. Community Events • Tukwila Pond Master Plan: The Project Stakeholder team met on July 7 to review the draft Master Plan. A Community Meeting is scheduled for July 21 from 6:00-7:30pm via Zoom. The link to the meeting will be available soon. 111. Staff Updates Public Safety • Community Outreach: The Community Police Team has been out in the community, visiting with people in parks, passing out slurpee tickets and stickers to children, meeting with local businesses like Museum of Flight and Days Inn, and interacting with families and individuals at the mall and local restaurants. Project Updates • Boeing Access Rd over Airport Way Bridge: Estimated Completion: July 2021 All the steel column jackets have been installed, the material that was removed for access to the footings has been back filled and the center pavilion on Airport Way has been paved. Crews will be onsite to reinstall the deck drains and clean up the construction/work zone. City staff is working with the construction management team to form/update the punch list items as the project is beginning to wrap up. • 42—a Ave S Bridge Replacement: Design continues for the 42nd Ave S Bridge. City staff has received permission from the council to submit the paperwork required to receive the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) funding for design. An open house meeting is scheduled for July 14, 2021, from 6:00 pm to 7:30 pm at the Tukwila Community Center. • Tukwila Village: The final apartment building is nearly complete and will open very soon. The developer/property owner, City, and King County Library System have reached agreement on the key provisions of a transportation and parking management plan. Now that construction is complete, new parking signage will be posted soon. • Tukwila Teen and Senior Center Project: Community outreach efforts continue with small group outreach across the Tukwila community as well as working with the Champions team. There are currently a total of 25 community champions. The champions are working towards evaluating and identifying potential spaces in the building/space, potential sites for the building/space, and potential layouts for the building/space. • Park Stewardship: From April- June 2021 the Adopt -A -Spot and Green Tukwila programs had a combined 143 volunteer occurrences and 261.5 volunteer hours in the field. This does not account for any of the professional crew work from Partner in Employment, King County, or Dirt Corps. Partner in Employment worked the last week at Tukwila Park with the Green Training program, 12 youth worked Monday -Thursday 9-4pm. The Homeschool Stewardship Squad met at Cottonwood Corner and tackled Bindweed and mulched for a couple hours. The Bhutanese Community Resource Center will start monthly work parties at Tukwila Park the last Monday of each month, 1-3pm to begin clearing ivy. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA,gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 116 City Administrator's Report July 14, 2021 Page 3 • Metro's Via to Transit Expansion: Transportation Demand staff is supporting Metro's Via to Transit expansion planned for August 9. The Tukwila Community Center will be a new hub that rides can be hailed to or from (in addition to Tukwila International Boulevard Station). Service hours are expanding from peak commute hours to match Link Light Rail hours (Monday through Saturday 5am-lam and Sundays 6am-12am). Via to Transit will also be expanding to Skyway and Renton Highlands. The Tukwila service area will remain the same for the August launch. Boards, Commissions and Committees • Arts Commission: The next meeting is scheduled for July 28, 2021. 2 Resident position terms expire December 31, 2021. VACANT: 1 Student Representative. One application received. Appointment recommendation scheduled for August 2, 2021. • Civil Service Commission: The next meeting is scheduled for July 15, 2021. 1 resident term set to expire December 31, 2021. No vacancies. • COPCAB: The next meeting is scheduled for August 12, 2021. 3 Resident position terms set to expire December 31, 2021. VACANT: 1 School District Representative and Student Representative. • Equity & Social Justice Commission: The next meeting is scheduled for August 5, 2021. 1 City Council Representative position term expires December 31, 2021. 2 Education position terms expires December 31, 2021. 1 City Employee position term expires December 31, 2021. 1 Community Representative position term expires December 31, 2021. VACANT: 1 Education Representative and Student Representative. • Human Services Advisory Board: The next meeting is in the process of being scheduled. 1 Resident position term expires December 31, 2021. 1 Faith -Based Community position term expires December 31, 2021. VACANT: 1 Business Community Representative. • Library Advisory Board: The next meeting is scheduled for October 6, 2021. 3 Resident position terms expire December 31, 2021. VACANT: Student Representative. • Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: The next meeting is scheduled for August 13, 2021. All positions are 1 -year terms. VACANT: 1 Business Collecting Tax Representative and 1 Funded by Tax Representative. • Park Commission: The next meeting is scheduled for July 14, 2021. 3 Community position terms expire December 31, 2021. VACANT: 1 Community Representative and Student Representative. • Planning Commission: The next meeting is scheduled for July 22, 2021. No terms set to expire in 2021. No vacancies. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA,gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 117 118 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS JULY 2021 Due to COVID-19, meetings will be held electronically, with telephone access available (see agenda page). JUL19 MON JUL20 TUE JUL 21 WED JUL 22 THU JUL 23 FRI JUL 24 SAT 9 Community Services and Safety 5:30 PM Electronic meeting 9 Planning and Community Development 5:30 PM Electronic meeting 9 City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM Electronic meeting Tukwila Village Farmers Market HOSTED BY FOOD INNOVATION NETWORK Come buy fresh produce grown by refugees and immigrants in our community. The Farmers Market follow all public health guidelines to ensure a safe market experience. Please wear a mask to the market, and stay home if you are not feeling well. 4:00 PM — 7:00 PM Wednesdays Jun 23—Oct 13 Tukwila Village Plaza 14350 Tukwila Intl Blvd Click here to sign up for the email newsletter. 9 Planning Commission 6:30 PM Electronic meeting HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL EVENT KING COUNTY WASTEMOBILE COLLECTION The Wastemobile travels to many communities to provide household hazardous waste disposal services for King County residents and accepts a wide variety of materials. Business waste is accepted from conditionally exempt small quantity generators (SQGs). Jul 23 — Jul 25 10:00 AM — 5:00 PM Midway Elementary School 22447 24th Ave S, Des Moines Click here for more information and other locations. GTv BLOOD! :► pa w TUKWILA BLOOD SHORTAGE! Donate by July 31 to win a new Peloton Bike! Your donation is critical! With less than a 24-hour supply of blood on hand for hospitals, more donors are needed to make and keep their appointments with Bloodworks Northwest. This shortage has left our community's blood supply at emergency levels, risking the inability to meet patient needs. Your gift of blood and time saves lives. To schedule an appointment, call 206-241-6300 or Click here to schedule an appointment online. JUL 26 MON JUL27 TUE JUL 28 WED JUL 29 THU JUL 30 FRI JUL31 SAT 9 Finance and Governance 5:30 PM Electronic meeting 9 Transportation and Infrastructure Services 5:30 PM Electronic meeting 9 City Council Committee of the Whole Meeting 7:00 PM Electronic meeting Tukwila Village Farmers Market HOSTED BY FOOD INNOVATION NETWORK Come buy fresh produce grown by refugees and immigrants in our community. 4:00 PM — 7:00 PM Wednesdays Jun 23—Oct 13 Tukwila Village Plaza 14350 Tukwila Intl Blvd 9 Arts Commission 6:00 PM Electronic meeting FIRE ADVISORY TASK FORCE MEMBERS NEEDED The City of Tukwila is currently seeking community representatives to serve on a new Fire Advisory Task Force. Application for appointment is due by 5:00 PM today. Click here for more information. NAL BLV Action Committee TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD ACTION COMMITTEE TRASH PICK-UP DAY For more information, call Sharon Mann at 206-200- 3616. COVID-19 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FOR RESIDENTS, WORKERS AND BUSINESSES Many changes are happening in response to the COVID-19 virus and federal, state and local governments are working to help. The City of Tukwila has compiled a range of information developed by various agencies and governments that may be helpful to our businesses, workers, and residents. Click here for more information and resources. vPcteit ?JO(Y2 tomo eom PARK N PLAY PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN 18 YEARS OF AGE AND YOUNGER JUL 6 through AUG 19 TUE & THU 11:00 AM —1 PM Free meals, snacks, activity kits and other essentials! Tukwila Parks and Recreation will deliver free meals, activity kits and snacks. CASCADE VIEW COMMUNITY PARK CRESTVIEW PARK TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENTER TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENTER SPRAY PARK IS OPEN FOR THE SUMMER! 10:00 AM — 8:00 PM Have a splash with your friends and families at the Spray Park! DRIVE THRU PICK-UP 3118 S 140TH ST TUESDAYS, THURSDAYS AND SATURDAYS 10:00 AM — 2:30 PM . A Tukwila Pantry is in need of shopping bags. V VOLUNTEERS — In need of volunteers between 8 AM — 1 PM for food packaging Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and food distributions er.4,-r�q� Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. To sign-up to volunteer, visit haps://www.signupgenius.com/go/9040a4dabac2ea1f85-volunteer2. OO DONORS — Please donate at TukwilaPantry.org. TSD SUMMER MEAL PROGRAM FOR STUDENTS - JUN 28 through JUL 29 MONDAY through THURSDAY J` • During the summer, students will have the option to pick up meals at certain TSD sites. Students will have access to a wholesome and 40:Tu kW � I a complete breakfast as well as a delicious and nutritious lunch at both sites. For more information, visit facebook.com/TukwilaSchools. 40. SCHOOL DISTRICT BREAKFAST 8:OOAM-8:30 AM CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY and FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL LUNCH 12:00 PM — 12:30 PM King LOunty KCLS LIBRARIES REOPEN TO FULL CAPACITY! 14380 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD You can pick up holds, browse, use computers, print and get help from staff. Curbside pick-up is no longer available. No events will be held Library System inside library buildings. For hours of operation, visit kcls.org/locations/154/ or call 206-242-1640. COVID-19 VACCINATION Public Health Hi All Washingtonians ages 12 and up are eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccination. Seattle & King County For more information, visit kingcounty.govlvaccine or call 206-477-3977. Interpreters are available for assistance. For telephone -to -text relay service, dial 711 or 1-800-833-6384. For tactile interpretation, visit seattledbsc.org. BILL PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS SOU A PSE offers two bill payment assistance programs for residential customers to help pay your electric or natural gas bills. Eligibility is based on your ENERGY household income and the number of people that live in your home. For more information, visit: www.pse.com/pages/bill-and-weatherization-assistance Available in other languages: CN 1 ES I HI! RU I VI Federal Communicat+or s Commission EMERGENCY BROADBAND BENEFIT FOR ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLDS The EBB will provide a discount of up to $50 per month towards broadband service for eligible households and up to $75 per month for households on qualifying Tribal lands. Eligible households can also receive a one-time discount of up to $100 to purchase a laptop, desktop computer or tablet from participating providers if they contribute more than $10 and less than $50 toward the purchases price. Enroll through a participating broadband provider or directly with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) using an online or mail in application. For more information, visit: www.fcc.gov/broadbandbenefit or call 833-511-0311. 119 Tentative Agenda Schedule MEETING 1 — REGULAR MEETING 2 — C.O.W. MEETING 3 — REGULAR MEETING 4 — C.O.W. JULY 6 Meeting cancelled due to the holiday week. JULY 12 See below link for the agenda packet to view the agenda items: July 12, 2021 Committee of the Whole / Special Meeting JULY 19 See below link for the agenda packet to view the agenda items: July 19, 2021 Regular Meeting JULY 26 Special Issues - COVID-19 Weekly Report. - Resolution on 2021 WRIA 9 (Water Resource Inventory Area 9) Habitat Plan. - Resolution regarding the Transit - Oriented Development Housing Strategies Plan. - Early Learning Facilities: Impact Fee Waivers. f MEETING 1 — REGULAR MEETING 2 — C.O.W. MEETING 3 — REGULAR MEETING 4 — C.O.W. AUGUST 2 Appointment AUGUST 9 Special Issues AUGUST 16 Consent Agenda AUGUST 23 Special Issues Confirm the appointment of Thanpia Suwanchote to a position on the Arts Commission. Consent Agenda - COVID-19 Weekly Report. - Fire Marshal Office Alternatives. - Tukwila South Residential Design Guidelines briefing. - Community Engagement Plan. Authorize the Mayor to sign 3 park lease agreements. Unfinished Business - COVID-19 Weekly Report. - Resolution relating to automated traffic safety camera revenue. - Request for 1 FTE Court Support Case Manager. Special Meeting to be followed by Committee of the Whole Meeting. Consent Agenda COVID-19 Weekly Report. Approve an application for Lodging Tax funds from the City of Tukwila for the Rave Green Run in the amount of $10,000. Unfinished Business - COVID-19 Weekly Report. - A resolution on the 2021 WRIA 9 (Water Resource Inventory Area 9) Habitat Plan. Resolution relating to automated traffic safety camera revenue. 120