Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL14-0003 - CARL NELSON - PETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION SEPAPETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48TH AVE S PL14-003 L14-0003 DR L14-0004 BLA E14-0001 SEPA E14-0001 SEPA City ofTukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION April 29, 2014 To: Carl Nelson, applicant Loise H Strander, Owner State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor PROJECT: Peterson Truck Fueling Station FILE NUMBERS: E14-0001 ASSOCIATED FILES : L 14-0003 APPLICANT: Carl Nelson REQUEST: The proposal is to demolish the existing restaurant building and construct a new 3,300 square feet canopy for truck diesel fueling station including six dispensers and two underground storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 50,000 gallons. Also, proposed is an above ground 2,000 gallon propane storage tank. LOCATION: 13100 48th Ave South, Tukwila WA 98188 This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Minnie Dhaliwal, who may be contacted at (206) 431-3670 for further information. The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: E14-0001 1-28-14 4-29-14 DNS Issued Jack Pace, Director Applicant: Carl Nelson Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: The proposal is to demolish the existing restaurant building and construct a new 3300 square feet canopy for truck diesel fueling station including six dispensers and two underground storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 50,000 gallons. Also, proposed is an above ground 2000 gallon propane storage tank. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: 13100 48th Ave South, Tukwila WA 98188 0003000045 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Jack P City of 6300 S e, Responsible Official ukwila thcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 y 131 tat' -P V( J ( Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No: E14-0001 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The current proposal is to demolish the existing restaurant building and construct a truck fueling station with associated site improvements including underground tanks, parking, driveway, and landscaping. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Peterson Truck Fueling Station Applicant: Carl Nelson Location: 13100 48th Ave S Zoning: C/LI Comprehensive Plan Designation: C/LI The following information was considered as part of review of this application. 1. SEPA Checklist dated January 27, 2014 and ESA screening checklist dated January 28, 2014. 2. Site Plan and Elevations prepared by Stantec Architecture Inc; PreliminaryPaving, Preliminary Grading/Drainage/Utility Plan and Landscape Plan prepared by Teraforma Design Group Inc. 3. Preliminary Technical Information Report dated January 28, 2014, prepared by Terraforma Design Group. 4. Environmental Noise Impact Analysis dated April 9, 2014, prepared by SSA Acoustics, LLP 5. Geotechnical Investigation dated December 5, 2013, prepared by Stantec Consulting Services 0 0 NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, Phone: 206-431-3685. III. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The proposal is to demolish the existing restaurant building and construct a new 3300 square feet canopy for truck diesel fueling station including six dispensers and two underground storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 50,000 gallons. Also, proposed is an above ground 2000 gallon propane storage tank. IV. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1-4 --Concur with checklist. 5- The demolition and construction will follow issuance of SEPA determination and after obtaining all required permits from the City of Tukwila or other agencies. 6- Concur with checklist. 7- Environmental Noise Impact Analysis was prepared by SSA Acoustics. 8- 9 10- In addition to the construction of the new fueling station the existing restaurant building will be demolished. The fueling station includes two underground tanks totaling 50,000 gallons. There is also a 2,000 gallon propane tank that will be installed above ground. 11-12—Concur with checklist. 0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a -b-- Concur with checklist. c -The site is underlain by soft to soft silt with areas of peat and some lose sands. Detailed soils information is contained in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Stantec Consulting Services. d -e -There is approximately 1000 cubic yards of cut and 750 cubic yards of fill proposed as part of this project. f-h—Concur with checklist 2. Air: a –Applicant is required to obtain all relevant permits from Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to address any emission to the air. b -c– Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a(1)-a(6)—Concur with checklist. b(1) and (2) -- Concur with checklist. c (1) –The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated to drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. c (2) – Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of demolition permit and the construction permit. d -- Concur with checklist. 4. Plants: a -d -- Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a-b—Concur with checklist. c- This area is part of the Pacific Flyway, a primary corridor for migratory bird species. d -Concur with checklist 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a –Concur with checklist. a(1)- (2)—Concur with checklist. 0 J b (1) – The applicant submitted Environmental Noise Impact Analysis report prepared by SSA Acoustics that documents background noise levels associated with the proximity of the site to the freeway. b(2) -b (3) –The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements. The applicant was asked to submit an acoustical report documenting how the project will comply with the city's noise standards. Environmental Noise Impact Analysis report prepared by SSA Acoustics dated April 9, 2014, was submitted by the applicant and the includes a recommendation of an acoustic barrier along the east property line to mitigate any noise impacts from trucks entering the property. The applicant has revised their proposal to include the fence to provide noise mitigation. Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts, associated with the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a -Hotel is to the north east; gas station to the south west; trucking company to the north; and I-5 to the south. b -The property is currently developed as a hotel, but it is possible that historically there were agricultural uses in the area. c -d-- Concur with checklist. e -f -The current Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation of the property is Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI). g -Concur with checklist. h -The property is currently developed as a hotel and there are no wetlands, watercourses or steep slopes shown on the property per the city' s sensitive areas maps. i -k -Concur with checklist 1 -The current zoning of the property is Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) and a fueling station is a permitted use in the C/LI zone. 9. Housing: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a-b—Concur with checklist. c- The project is subject to design review and is required to comply with the design review criteria. 11. Light and Glare: a -d -- Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a -c – Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: a -b- Concur with checklist. c -The project is not providing any parking spaces other than the fueling stations. The existing restaurant has approximately 40-50 parking stalls. d -g Concur with checklist. 15. Public Services: a -b -- Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a -b -- Concur with checklist. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS Written comments were received from Manmohan and Sarb Dhillon, owners of the property to the east, which a Days Inn hotel. See attached comments and the city's response. VI. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC 197-11-340, a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued for this project This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above "Final Staff Evaluation for Application No. E14-0001", and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by city of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Prepared by: Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor Date: April 29, 2014 Minnie Dhaliwal From: Minnie Dhaliwal Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 5:49 PM To: 'sabidaysinn@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Project file # PL14-0003 (E14-0001) Truck fueling station Attachments: Environmental Noise Impact Report - Peterson Truck Fueling Islands (04-09-14).pdf Manmohan and Sarb, Thank you for taking the time to comment on this project. The underlying zoning at the subject property is Commercial/Light Industrial and a fueling station is a permitted use in that zone. Regarding noise, the city asked the applicant to submit a report from an acoustical engineer documenting compliance with the city's noise code. The noise report is attached. Also, the applicant has revised their proposal to help mitigate noise to your property by proposing a fence that will act as a noise barrier. The city will be issuing a an environmental determination and a design review decision soon on this project and you will receive a copy of those decisions. Please let me know if you have any questions. Minnie 'Mame V!ediet at Planning Supervisor) City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 (Tukwila, WA 98188 Ph. 206-431-3685 Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov The City of choice, the community of opportunity From: sabidaysinn@a>comcast.net[mailto:sabidaysinn©comcast.neti Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 7:04 PM To: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: Project file # PL14-0003 (E14-0001) Truck fueling station Minnie, Demolition of the existing Restaurant Building and anticipation of construction of the "Peterson Truck Fueling Station" is not a supportive idea from our business point of view. As experienced business owners, we are concerned with the level of noise that will result from this project and we strongly feel that there will be a high level of undesired noise leakage that will negatively impact our occupancy and harm our business. Also to our knowledge, the Restaurant building in this project can only be replaced with same type of business. As a result and after a thorough analysis, we the owners and management, of Days Inn Tukwila do not support this project. We would kindly like to request a copy of any decision made on this application. I can be reached at 206-786-9624 for any further discussions 1 Kind Regards, Manmohan &Sarb Dhillon Days Inn South Seattle/Tukwila 13050 48th Ave S Seattle, WA 98168 Ph:206-241-2200 *300 Fax:206-246-0222 2 Minnie Dhaliwal From: Minnie Dhaliwal Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:35 PM To: sepa (sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov) Cc: Teri Svedahl Subject: RE: Tukwila Project -76 Gas Station Attachments: D00013.pdf; D00014.pdf; D00015.pdf Attached is the checklist and SEPA determination for Truck Fueling Station station in Tukwila. Thank you, J'?'l4usie Dlaeicod Planning Supervisor 'City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 1001 Tukwila, WA 98188 Ph. 206-431-3685 Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov The City of choice, the community of opportunity .,...Lez,Jc6=( D vL Ce -VY( I3 Q� D . 0 Minnie Dhaliwal From: Minnie Dhaliwal Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:26 PM To: 'Nelson, Carl' Subject: Petterson 76 Attachments: D00014.pdf; D00013.pdf The SEPA determination for Peterson Truck Fueling Station is attached. The Design Review decision will be issued after the 14 day comment period for SEPA. Let me know if you have any questions. Minnie 1 SSA acoustics Stewed .Alt AAaoue • Burt • MYIeMpein April 9, 2014 Carl Nelson Stantec Architecture 1932 1st Avenue, #307 Seattle, Washington 98101 SSA Acoustics, LLP 222 Etruria St, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 839-0819 - P RE: Peterson Truck Fueling Islands — Environmental Noise Impact Analysis 13100 48th Ave S, Tukwila, WA 98168 This letter presents the results of an environmental noise study and analysis conducted for the proposed Peterson Truck Fueling Islands located at 13100 48th Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of the analysis is to document the potential impact from the proposed diesel trucks entering the fueling islands from the north driveway and exiting the south driveway. Predicted noise levels generated by the operations are compared to the existing environmental noise limits and the City of Tukwila noise ordinance to the nearest receiving property to the north. ZONING Per the City of Tukwila it is our understanding the project and adjacent properties are currently zoned as follows: o Project Site: o North: o South: o East: ❑ West: C/LI C/LI C/LI (same owner) Interstate 5 C/LI As per Tukwila chapter 8.22.020 Definitions (b) "Commercial district" includes the zone C/LI (Commercial Light Industrial). The following figure is a zoning map with the project site highlighted in red, Figure 1. SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Figure 1 Project Site Zoning Map Page 2 of 17 SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration 0 Q Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 3 of 17 NOISE ORDINANCE The applicable noise ordinance is described by the City of Tukwila Chapter 8.22 Noise, section 8.22.050 Maximum Permissible Sound Levels. The chapter states that "No person may produce or permit to be produced sound that exceeds the following maximum permissible sound levels when measured at or within the boundary of a receiving property": Table 1 Maximum Permissible Sound Levels District of Sound Source District of Receiving Property Commercial (dB(A)) (Leq) Commercial 60 In addition, at any hour of the day or night, the applicable noise limitations above may be exceeded for any receiving property by no more than: a. 5 dB(A) for a total of 15 minutes in any one-hour period, measured as L(25); b. 10 dB(A) for a total of 5 minutes in any one-hour period, measured as L(8); c. 15 dB(A) for a total of 1.5 minutes in any one-hour period, measured as L(2). Section 8.22.090 Motor Vehicle Exemptions states that "sounds created by motor vehicles operated on public highways are subject to the provisions of TMC Sections 8.22.060 through 8.22.080 (which discuss mufflers, stereos, and wheel noise) and are exempt from TMC Section 8.22.050. However, sounds created by motor vehicles operated off public highways and motor vehicle audio systems operated anywhere are subject to the provisions of TMC Section 8.22.050". The trucks that are using this fueling station are subject to the noise ordinance when pulling through the fueling station, but not when traveling on Interstate 5 or 48th Avenue South. The noise from a constant flow of trucks into the fueling station cannot exceed 60 dB(A) to the adjacent property, and noise from the occasional truck pulling into the station cannot exceed 65 dB(A) (L(25)). Though these sound levels assume the background sound level at the shared property line is equal to or less than 60 dB(A). SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 4of17 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MEASUREMENTS & RESULTS The following measurements were taken to quantify the background sound levels impacting this site from traffic on Interstate 5 and other vehicles on 481[1 Avenue South Two environmental noise monitors were placed in the pine trees along the north shared property line with the Days Inn The weather during the measurements was va/od, but because of this location did not have a noticeable impact on the noise measurernent results. There was rneasureable rainfall on (0.11 inches) Thursday April 3m anU (008 inches) Saturday April 5»1: the wind speeds only exceed 15 mph on Thu|sdayApo| 3u dudnO the 7:00 PM hour. Figure 2: Monitor Locations Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Table 2: Noise Monitoring Results Page 5 of 17 Measutemer f Description _ g £. _ Sound P"ressureLeveI, dB(A)n. r, Hourly Daytime Average, LEQ — Weekday 74 dB(A) Hourly Nighttime Average, LEQ — Weekday 70 dB(A) Hourly Daytime Average, LEQ — Weekend 73 dB(A) Hourly Nighttime Average, LEQ — Weekend 68 dB(A) Day -Night Average Sound Level (Lan) Lan = 77 d6(A)® Lan = 81 dB(A) Lowest Daytime = Constant Sound Sound Level for 90% of Hour, L(90) L(90) = 69 dB(A) Lowest Daytime = Constant Sound Sound Level for 90% of Hour, L(90) L(90) = 64 dB(A) Outdoor Hourly Average Noise Level (LEQ) 20•1•I.ITI•I.I.I.1.1.1.I1.1.1,1,I.1•1•I.1•f.I:I.I•I:t "•I.I.I•I.I.I•I.I.I.I,I.I•I,I,I.I.I,I. L I,I.1 I.I;'1,1.1 ,I.1 1•I 1 1•I I:I•I.I,I.I 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 AO 0 0 00 00 AO AO 0 0 00 0 AO 00 00 0 00 00 00 AO 0 0 00 00 0 00 00 \g". ryry. cl; 6• NO. ^a. ��. �'. c,. 6..,0. Na. ^0. �'. �'. 6• ,o. ��`• ^0. �'. �'. 6. �. ,,t`. Ng). �,• 1,. 6. ^A. ^�'. ,,%. rye. �'• 6 ^co. Time (hr:min) Figure 3: Measured Average Hourly Sound Levels SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 6 of 17 • Long-term noise monitoring was taken at 2 locations at the shared property line just north of the proposed entrance driveway. o Measurements were completed for 138 hours between 5:00 PM Tuesday April 1, 2014 and 11:00 AM Monday April 7, 2014. o The units were both checked to 94.0 dB at 1,000 Hz prior to starting testing, and checked at the conclusion and were within 0.3 dB of calibration, which is a normal variance with weather conditions. Notes & Picture of monitoring locations: o Orange Monitor (®): Larson Davis 820 (Type 1, integrating sound level meter) - SN: 1594, Certified: 01/08/2014) was placed in evergreen tree along the north shared property line between the existing parking lot of the unoccupied building and the Days Inn parking lot. Figure 4: Orange Monitor Location SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 7 of 17 o Black Monitor ( ): Svantek 971 (Type 1, spectrum analyzer) - SN: 35722, Certified: 02/2014) was placed in evergreen tree along the north shared property line between the existing parking lot of the unoccupied building and the Days Inn parking lot. The sound levels were consistently 3 dB louder at this monitor location compared to the orange monitor location due to the distance from Interstate 5. Figure 5: Black Monitor Location SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration (Th Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 8 of 17 OPERATIONS & PREDICTED NOISE IMPACT The following predicted noise impact is based on measurements of diesel trucks idling and at low speeds (less than 10 mph) at a quiet location in truck storage facility in Puyallup, Washington in 2013. These measurements were used to calculate the noise impact from trucks to the north shared property line and the building envelope of the hotel. These calculations are based on the estimated number of trucks per day, specified by the owner/operator to be 150 vehicles per 24 hours, the orientation of the proposed truck fueling islands compared to the north property, and the average speed the trucks will travel through the fueling station. In addition, this evaluation assumed that all trucks will be turned off during fueling per Washington state law. 0 ctt0 * 0n* 34 j 48TH AVE E .ern ,m.. a.•.+ e ra 0 0 l� e 0 0 00 0.0 , y 00 INT 1 6; • Ela; NORTH Figure 6: Proposed Fueling Islands L 1wu�aN.oxpw 110,000.1.0.01.1 WINGSON0010. Nra nuclmawl NWNONIw. NNIOCOI I'S OFF um, 011.401 ANN l.. INN North Receiving Property The noise impact estimates assume the trucks are traveling at speeds of less than 5 mph from the entrance driveway to the fueling islands, and the average sound level for slow speeds used in this analysis was 78 dB(A) at 15 feet, which is equal to 92 dB(A) at 3 -feet and 88 dB(A) at 5 -feet. The layout of the fueling islands does not provide room for vehicles to idle within the lot for rest overs. Any vehicle that enters the fueling station must travel through the fueling islands and be turned off for fueling. The following noise impact calculations are based on the best estimates of noise from the trucks during peak daytime and nighttime hours, and during a higher use daytime hour. The trucks are estimated to take between 35 to 45 seconds between entering the north driveway and parking at the fueling pumps, and an additional 45 seconds after fueling to start-up and depart from the south driveway. SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Table 3: Noise Impact Analysis Page 9 of 17 Predicted: Condition Sound PressureLevel, dB(A), 30 Trucks during Peak Hour Predicted at shared North Property Line (if background noise was Tess than 50 dB(A)) 62 dB(A) 22 Trucks during any one-hour Predicted at shared North Property Line (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 60 dB(A) 6 Trucks during Peak Nighttime Hour Predicted at shared North Property Line (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 56 dB(A) 30 Trucks during Peak Hour Predicted at Days Inn Building Envelope (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 55 dB(A) 22 Trucks during any one-hour Predicted at Days Inn Building Envelope (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 53 dB(A) 6 Trucks during Peak Nighttime Hour Predicted at Days Inn Building Envelope (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 49 dB(A) 30 Trucks during Peak Hour Predicted at shared North Property Line (Current Background Noise Levels) 74 dB(A) "No Impact" 14 Trucks during any one daytime hour Predicted at shared North Property Line (Current Background Noise Levels) 74 dB(A) "No Impact" 14 Trucks during any one nighttime hour Predicted at shared North Property Line (Current Background Noise Levels) 68 dB(A) "No Impact" 6 Trucks during Peak Nighttime Hour Predicted at shared North Property Line (Current Background Noise Levels) 68 dB(A) "No Impact" Day -Night Average Sound Level (Lan) with 150 trucks per day (16% at night) (Background Noise less than 50 dB(A)) Ldn = 59 dB(A) Day -Night Average Sound Level (Ldn) with 150 trucks per day (16% at night) (Current Background Noise Levels) Lan = 77 dB(A) "No Impact" Based on our calculations the noise impact from the trucks using the Peterson Truck Fueling islands will not increase the sound level to the adjacent properties due to the elevated sound level at this location from traffic on Interstate 5. For a sound source to SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration 0 Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 10 of 17 contribute to the overall sound level it must be within 6 dB of the background sound level; for example, a new noise impact of 54 dBA to existing 60 dBA background noise would increase the overall sound level to 61 dBA. Sound sources that are 10 dB or more less than the existing background noise do not increase the overall sound level, and in most cases are not perceivable. If 22 or fewer trucks access the fueling station in any one- hour period the predicted sound level at the shared property line will be 60 dB(A) or Tess, but if up to 30 full size diesel trucks access the fueling station during a peak use hour; which has been identified as a potential peak use, the predicted impact without the contribution of background noise would be 62 dB(A). The following noise mitigation measures are proposed to ensure that during all hours the sound level at the shared property line does not exceed 60 dB(A). Though it should be noted that the sound from the trucks using this station will not increase the overall noise level to any receiving property, and would not be considered a noise impact to any adjacent properties. NOISE MITIGATION PLAN To ensure engine and wheel noise to the nearest receiving property to the north meet the 60 dB(A) city noise ordinance, we recommend installing a 6'-0" high solid fence along the shared property line. 1) Install a 6'-0" high solid fence along the shared north property line for the areas noted in Figure 7 below. a. The barrier should have a minimum surface weight of 2.5 -lbs per sq ft. i. Materials: 1/2 -inch thick exterior grade plywood, 1/2 -inch thick cement board or cement siding, and 16 -gauge steel sheet metal, or similar material that is solid, continuous and satisfies the surface weight requirement. 1. These materials can be covered with cedar boards, painted, or finished to your needs ii. Barrier Requirements: 1. No more than a 1 -inch gap between the ground and the bottom of the barrier 2. No holes, gaps, or openings in the barrier 3. All penetrations should be sealed with flexible exterior grade silicone caulk iii. Predicted Noise Reduction: 6 dB(A) to parking lot and to 1st floor rooms 1. Distance to 1st and 2nd floor rooms is 7 dB(A) reduction compared to property line, as shown in Table 3. 2. The updated predicted noise impact at the property line is shown in SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands 3. Table 4. MODIFIED DRIVE EXC. DI{IVE F2 14:2 25.0 48TH AVE S -0 00 - 4 0 b r_ • —1 1 LANDSCAPE ni 541'45'43"W 1399.73' (MEAS.) PYLON SIGN--"- Page IGN I I 1 1 1 l ' 68'-11• i 25'.D__I _I bk z NEW SID*L WALK "—� " • PROPOSED 2S LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT M PROCESS 1 C NEW PROPANE TANK I'S OFF RAMP Figure 7: Noise Barrier kt ki3 ,t z z Page 11 of 17 45O 19'-5 MODRED DRIVE o' —Jr EX. DRIVE~!. �\ 13('-r WEUNG ISLAND WITH DISPENSER. SEE ELEVATIONS UNDERGROUND FUEL I STORAGE TANKS .J 4 S' CAPE FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED Noise Barrier (E) WSDOT FENCE 2 23'-0' )O_1 S- r A • SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration ENTER ONLY SIGN TYP OF2 NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE ll Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 12 of 17 TOP PLAN BOTTOM I! _I 111 11_ NOISE BARRIER DETAIL (1) LAYER 1/2" PLYWOOD, (1) LAYER 1/2" CEMENT BOARD, OR (1) LAYER OF 16 GAUGE SHEET METAL OR A CONTINUOUS MATERIAL WITH SURFACE WEIGHT OF 2.5 LB/SF BARRIER MATERIAL SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. ALL GAPS OR JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED W/ ACOUSTICAL CAULKING FRAMING AS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS MAXIMUM OF 1" GAP ALLOWED FOR DRAINAGE *NOTE: MATERIALS SUCH AS SIDING CAN BE ADDED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BARRIER FOR AESTHETIC PURPOSES, BUT MAY NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR REQUIRED LAYERS OF PLYWOOD, CEMENT BOARD, OR SHEET METAL. NTS Figure 8: Noise Barrier Sketch SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Table 4: Noise Impact Analysis with Noise Barrier Page 13 of 17 =Predicted xCondition ::Sound; Pressure Level, dB(A) 30 Trucks during Peak Hour Predicted at North Property Line with 6'-0" barrier (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 57 dB(A) 22 Trucks during any one-hour Predicted at North Property Line with 6'-0" barrier (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 55 dB(A) 6 Trucks during Peak Nighttime Hour Predicted at North Property Line with 6'-0" barrier (if background noise was less than 50 dB(A)) 52 dB(A) 30 Trucks during Peak Hour Predicted at North Property Line with 6'-0" barrier (Current Background Noise Levels) 74 dB(A) "No Change" 14 Trucks during any one daytime hour Predicted at Property Line with 6'-0" barrier (Current Background Noise Levels) 74 dB(A) "No Change" 14 Trucks during any one nighttime hour Predicted at Property Line with 6'-0" barrier (Current Background Noise Levels) 68 dB(A) "No Change" The noise impact from the truck activities will be reduced by 5 to 6 dB(A) by the 6'-0" barrier, but the perception of overall sound will not change due to the high background noise levels. With the noise barrier the truck fueling islands can serve over 60 trucks in any one hour period and not exceed the 60 dB(A) noise limit. SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration r�1 Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 14 of 17 SUMMARY This letter shows that the proposed truck activities without mitigation will not be a noise impact to the adjacent neighboring properties. Though to satisfy the 60 dB(A) City of Tukwila noise ordinance a 6'-0" high solid barrier is needed to ensure the projected peak hour volume of 30 trucks complies at the north shared property line. Should there be questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, rik Miller -Klein, P.E. Associate Partner Acoustical Consultant SSA Acoustics, LLP 222 Etruria St, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 839-0819 — P (206) 658-7920 — C erikassaacoustics.com SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration 4 Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 15 of 17 APPENDIX A. DESCRIPTORS To better understand acoustics, here is a brief overview regarding sound and vibration properties, descriptors and terms. Interior noise is often measured as an A -weighted sound level in units of decibels, symbolized as dB(A). The A -weighting is a specific weighting filter in a sound level meter that corresponds approximately to the sensitivity of human hearing at the various frequencies. Sound levels vary significantly, depending on location and activities. People normally experience sound levels between about 30 and 90 dBA, depending on their activity. For example, a nearby noisy vehicle, radio, or power tool may produce 90 dBA; normal conversation is about 55 to 65 dBA; and a bedroom or quiet office is about 30 to 40 dBA. Subjective evaluation Decibels * Rriamples Threshold -- 4 of pain Threshold --9 of felling Threshold '-- of hearing loss (long-term exposure) Speech Threshold --� of hearing (or audibility) 140 •Jet engine C 75 ft auaay' - 130 • Jet aircraft during takeoff ( 300 ft aaaa) 120 01Hard rocl: band (With electronic amplification) • Thunder (nearby) Deafeninc 110 •hccelerating motorcycle at 44 ft away Painful (and dangerous) 100 q0 bD *crowdhnose (104t l)game a•►Printing press •pneumatic concrete breaker •Computer eq.uipmen't room •Cafeteria with sound -reflecting $urfarea 70 • B-757 aircraft cabin during flight •Crac.kling• of plastic food wrappers (2ftaway) GO •Neer highwaytraffic ( when >55dpoA, road = and reit trafic annot most people) 0 •Office activities 40 •Soft stereo music in residence 30 •Residence without etereo playing' (Iate at ni%ht) 2.0 •Whisper •fudiometria testing room • Rustle of leaves in breeze • Human breathing' 10 Very loud Loud Moderate Faint Ver Faint SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration rl Peterson Truck Fueling Islands Page 16 of 17 Ldn — Day -Night average noise level, sometimes designated as DNL, is a computed sound level measured over a 24-hour period that adjusts for human sensitivity during normal sleeping hours, 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. This sound level is used to evaluate the acceptability of a project site proposed for rooms and residences where people sleep. The average sound level is calculated with a 10 dB(A) addition to the nighttime hour between 10:00 PM and 7:00 as a weighted penalty for human sensitivity. SSA Acoustics, LLP Consutants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Peterson Truck Fueling Islands APPENDIX B. BARRIER GEOMETRY Page 17 of 17 30 25 20 Source Height: 4 ft Noise Barrier - Geometry Truck Engine to Shared North Property Barrier Location: X = 35 ft, Y = 6 ft Receiver Location: X = 40 ft, Y = 5 ft 10 Diesel Truck 10, HSource 0 5 10 15 Path -Length Difference (L) = 0.14 ft A=35.06,8=5.1,D=40.01 Receiver- Person in Parking Lot 20 25 30 35 Distance (ft) 40 45 SSA Acoustics, LLP Consultants in Architectural, Mechanical, Environmental Acoustics, and Vibration Minnie Dhaliwal From: sabidaysinn@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 7:04 PM To: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: Project file # PL14-0003 (E14-0001) Truck fueling station Minnie, Demolition of the existing Restaurant Building and anticipation of construction of the "Peterson Truck Fueling Station" is not a supportive idea from our business point of view. As experienced business owners, we are concerned with the level of noise that will result from this project and we strongly feel that there will be a high level of undesired noise leakage that will negatively impact our occupancy and harm our business. Also to our knowledge, the Restaurant building in this project can only be replaced with same type of business. As a result and after a thorough analysis, we the owners and management, of Days Inn Tukwila do not support this project. We would kindly like to request a copy of any decision made on this application. I can be reached at 206-786-9624 for any further discussions Kind Regards, Manmohan &Sarb Dhillon Days Inn South Seattle/Tukwila 13050 48th Ave S Seattle, WA 98168 Ph:206-241-2200 *300 Fax:206-246-0222 1 Stantec To: File: Minnie Dhaliwal City of Tuckwilla Peterson 76 From: Date: Carl Nelson Stantec Architecture March 27, 2014 Reference: Response to Design Review and SEPA comments 1)We received comments from the neighboring property owner regarding potential for noise from the truck fueling station. The City's noise code can be found at http://records.tukwilawa.gov/WebLink8/1/doc/56243/Electronic.aspx Please provide documentation that the proposed use shall comply with the city's noise code. Also, revise the section of the SEPA checklist that pertains to noise impacts to accurately reflect the impacts. The subject property and all adjacent property is zoned as commercial light industrial as well as the adjacent Hotel property. Based on 8.22.050 of the Tuckwila Municipal code the maximum sound producing source for this zone is 70dBA. Based on a published report the following noise levels will be produced by the proposed development. Heavy Truck idling Low Speed Truck movement (10-25mph) Truck door opening/closing Air brakes Truck engine starting noise 72 dBA at 25 feet 75 dBA at 25 feet 65 dBA at 25 feet 65-75 dBA at 25 feet 74 dBA at 25 feet The code allows for an increase in the levels between 5, 10 or 15dBA over the 70dBA maximum if the sounds level is limited in time between 15, 5 or 11/2" minutes per a 1 hour period. When a single truck goes through the fueling process the vast majority of that time is spent turned off while fueling. From the point in which the vehicles enters the site adjacent to the hotel property and maneuverers forward into a fueling position will be approximately 20 seconds of sound at 75dBA at the boundary of the hotel property. Anticipated 150 truck visits in 24 hours = 6.25 truck visits per hour. 6.25 visits x 20 seconds = 2.1 minutes @ 75dBA at the edge of the hotel property. Code allows us a 10dBA increase for this scenario for a maximum of 80dBA. Design with community in mind nc v:\2007\active\2007833019\correspondence\jurisdiction\planning response letter\repsonse to planning comments peterson 76.docx Stantec March 27, 2014 Minnie Dhaliwal Page 2 of 3 Reference: Response to Design Review and SEPA comments Understanding that the calculation is based on a 24 hour average and there will be peak hours in which there will be an increased in traffic. If those peak hours were double of the 24 hour average it would equal 12.5 visits per hour it would still only be 4 minutes of sound at 75dBA and still be in compliance with the code requirement. In addition to the above code argument we can state that the proposed development will not provide an increase of sound levels to the adjacent hotel than what already presently exist today. The constant flow of trucks going up and down 48th to the adjacent properties as well as the constant traffic along Interstate 5 create sound levels that are greater than the sound levels that would be made by our proposed development. 2)Page 13 the checklist inaccurately references Walla Walla Municipal Code instead of Tukwila Municipal Code. Checklist has been updated and is attached. 3) The business owner mentioned that the proposal does not include any removal of trees along the east property line. The plans submitted with the application show that three evergreen trees are proposed to be removed. Please confirm if the trees are proposed to be removed or not. I have discussed this with the owner and confirmed that we are removing 3 existing trees as proposed on the plans. 4) Please address comments from the Fire Department listed below and provide the size of all the tanks including the liquid propane tank. a)Underground fuel tank installations shall comply with IFC Chapters 23, 57 and NFPA 30. b) Underground fuel tanks shall be designed/engineered to prevent uplift during high water table conditions. c) Liquid Propane tank installation shall comply with IFC Chapter 61, Tank size was not indicated. There will be (2) underground tanks totaling 50,000 gallons. One tank will be a 30K tank split 20K/10K Diesel/DEF split the other tank will be a 20K diesel tank. The tanks installed will comply with IFC chapters 23,57 and NFPA 30 as well as be engineered to prevent uplift. The propane tank will be 2,000 gallons and comply with applicable codes. Design with community in mind nc v:\2007\active\2007833019\correspondence\jurisdiction\planning response letter\repsonse to planning comments peterson 76.docx Stantec March 27, 2014 Minnie Dhaliwal Page 3 of 3 Reference: Response to Design Review and SEPA comments 5) Provide information (size, location, design) about any existing and proposed signs on the property, including dimensions of the sign on the canopy. - All existing building signage and the existing pylon sign will be removed. - There are (4) proposed signs on the new canopy. They will be 2'-8" in diameter and will be internally backlight. Exterior elevations have been updated to reflect this. - The intent is to install a monument sign and the owner is in progress of working out these details with his sign vendor. The intent would be to have the maximum size sign as allowed by code per 19.20.040 Table 1 Tess than 400' of right of way. 6) Provide setback dimensions of the trash enclosure from the property line, it is required to comply with the minimum setback requirements. The setbacks at the east and south property lines adjacent to the trash enclosure are required to be 5'. We are providing 5'-11" setback from the south property line and 10'- 10" from the east property line. 7) Is there a possibility to plant some shrubs/trees along the rear property line Additional shrubs will be provided along rear property line, see revised landscape plan. 8) Provide accurate grade and fill amounts required for excavation and installation of the underground tanks. Cut= 1000 cy, Fill= 750 cy. Carl Nelson Phone: 206.920.5636 Carl.nelson@stantec.com Attachment: c. Steven Peterson Design with community in mind nc v:\2007\active\2007833019\correspondence\jurisdiction\planning response letter\repsonse to planning comments peterson 76.docx Stantec To: Minnie Dhaliwal From: Carl Nelson City of Tuckwilla Stantec Architecture File: Peterson 76 Date: March 27, 2014 Reference: Response to Design Review and SEPA comments 1)We received comments from the neighboring property owner regarding potential for noise from the truck fueling station. The City's noise code can be found at http://records.tukwilawa.gov/WebLink8/1/doc/56243/Electronic.aspx Please provide documentation that the proposed use shall comply with the city's noise code. Also, revise the section of the SEPA checklist that pertains to noise impacts to accurately reflect the impacts. Noise study is being prepared by acoustical consultant and will be provided once complete. 2)Page 13 the checklist inaccurately references Walla Walla Municipal Code instead of Tukwila Municipal Code. Checklist has been updated and is attached. 3) The business owner mentioned that the proposal does not include any removal of trees along the east property line. The plans submitted with the application show that three evergreen trees are proposed to be removed. Please confirm if the trees are proposed to be removed or not. I have discussed this with the owner and confirmed that we are removing 3 existing trees as proposed on the plans. 4) Please address comments from the Fire Department listed below and provide the size of all the tanks including the liquid propane tank. a)Underground fuel tank installations shall comply with IFC Chapters 23, 57 and NFPA 30. b) Underground fuel tanks shall be designed/engineered to prevent uplift during high water table conditions. c) Liquid Propane tank installation shall comply with IFC Chapter 61, Tank size was not indicated. There will be (2) underground tanks totaling 50,000 gallons. One tank will be a 30K tank split 20K/10K Diesel/DEF split the other tank will be a 20K diesel tank.. The tanks installed will comply with IFC chapters 23,57 and NFPA 30 as well as be engineered to prevent uplift. Design with community in mind nc v:\2007\active\2007833019\correspondence\jurisdiction\planning response letter\repsonse to planning comments peterson 76 2.docx Stantec March 27, 2014 Minnie Dhaliwal Page 2 of 2 0 Reference: Response to Design Review and SEPA comments The propane tank will be 2,000 gallons and comply with applicable codes. 5) Provide information (size, location, design) about any existing and proposed signs on the property, including dimensions of the sign on the canopy. - All existing building signage and the existing pylon sign will be removed. - There are (4) proposed signs on the new canopy. They will be 2'-8" in diameter and will be internally backlight. Exterior elevations have been updated to reflect this. - The intent is to install a monument sign and the owner is in progress of working out these details with his sign vendor. The intent would be to have the maximum size sign as allowed by code per 19.20.040 Table 1 less than 400' of right of way. 6) Provide setback dimensions of the trash enclosure from the property line, it is required to comply with the minimum setback requirements. The setbacks at the east and south property lines adjacent to the trash enclosure are required to be 5'. We are providing 5'-11" setback from the south property line and 10'- 10" from the east property line. 7) Is there a possibility to plant some shrubs/trees along the rear property line Additional shrubs will be provided along rear property line, see revised landscape plan. 8) Provide accurate grade and fill amounts required for excavation and installation of the underground tanks. Cut= 1000 cy, Fill= 750 cy. Carl Nelson Phone: 206.920.5636 Carl.nelson@stantec.com Attachment: c. Steven Peterson Design with community in mind nc v:\2007\active\2007833019\correspondence\jurisdiction\planning response letter\repsonse to planning comments peterson 76 2.docx Minnie Dhaliwal From: sabidaysinn@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 7:04 PM To: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: Project file # PL14-0003 (E14-0001) Truck fueling station Minnie, Demolition of the existing Restaurant Building and anticipation of construction of the "Peterson Truck Fueling Station" is not a supportive idea from our business point of view. As experienced business owners, we are concerned with the level of noise that will result from this project and we strongly feel that there will be a high level of undesired noise leakage that will negatively impact our occupancy and harm our business. Also to our knowledge, the Restaurant building in this project can only be replaced with same type of business. As a result and after a thorough analysis, we the owners and management, of Days Inn Tukwila do not support this project. We would kindly like to request a copy of any decision made on this application. can be reached at 206-786-9624 for any further discussions Kind Regards, Manmohan &Sarb Dhillon Days Inn South Seattle/Tukwila 13050 48th Ave S Seattle, WA 98168 Ph:206-241-2200 *300 Fax:206-246-0222 1 MEMORANDUM www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor Obt FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer David.McPherson@TukwilaWA.gov DATE: March 12, 2014 SUBJECT: Peterson Truck Fueling Station 13100 48th Ave. South TL nos. 000300-0045 / 000300-0113 SEPA, Design Review, Boundary Line Adjustment, and Miscellaneous Comments SEPA — E14-0001 New use will generate less Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips therefore, there is no Concurrency Test Fee and no Transportation Impact Fee for this proposed project. The environmental checklist should be revised as follows: B. Environmental Elements 5. Animals c. Yes — This area is part of the Pacific Flyway. A primary corridor for migratory bird species. Design Review — L14-0003 New use will generate less Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips therefore, there is no Concurrency Test Fee and no Transportation Impact Fee for this proposed project. Boundary Line Adjustment — L14-0004 No comments. Page 1 of 1 CURRAN' LAW FIRM March 6, 2014 PRtsc9vcJ MAR 07 2014 f, (/ tkli nl ';f-1_0111 Ar City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: 13310 Interurban Ave. To Whom It May Concern: T 253 852 2345 F 253 852 2030 F 253 859 8037 Curran Law Firm P.S. 555 West Smith Street Post Office Box 140 Kent, WA 98035-0140 curranfirm.com Please find enclosed the affidavit of ownership for the redevelopment of the above referenced property. The enclosed form has been modified because the redevelopment is being conducted by the owner's tenant. Sincerely, CURRAN LAW FIRM P.S. G •-g W affner • affnerr curranfirm.com encl. cc: Louise Strander Stan Peterson Theresa M. Ahern Mark W. Davis Chad Horner Retired: John M. Casey Greg W. Haffner J. David Huhs Charles P. Curran Sam Chalfant David G. Hobson Kevin J. Jussel Melvin L. Kleweno, Jr. Mary E. Coleman David T. Hokit Jane C. Rhodes 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RI CEIVF FEB 10 2014 TUKWILt-, PUBLIC WORKS File Number E14-0001 SEPA L14-0003 DR L14-0004 BLA LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building ❑ Planning ublic Works �❑� Fire Dept. Police Dept. 01 Parks/Rec Project: Peterson Truck Fueiling Station Address: 13100 48`h Ave S Date transmitted: 2/10/2014 Response requested by: 2/24/2014 Staff coordinator: Minnie Dhaliwal Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Please review the SEPA, Design Review and BLA applications SEE PW Co,N,w►Enrrs /nl 1i2,AlC ; Plan check date: Comments prepared by: Update date: / / � 1 0400 TO: c City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E14-0001 SEPA L14-0003 DR L14-0004 BLA LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM uilding 0 Planning UI Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: Peterson Truck Fueiling Station Address: 13100 48th Ave S Date transmitted: 2/10/2014 Response requested by: 2/24/2014 Staff coordinator: Minnie Dhaliwal Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Please review the SEPA, Design Review a d BLA ap • lications Plan check date: f. (r CommentsUpdate date: prepared by. • ACOUSTICS . ' ACOUSTICS Stewart • Ait Allaoua ACOUSTICS ACOUSTI Environmental Noise Review of Kenosha Industrial Development Tumwater, WA Prepared for: Bob Boyd, Project Manager Puget Western, Inc. 19515 North Creek Parkway, Suite 310 Bothell, WA 98011 Prepared by: SSA Acoustics, LLP 222 Etruria St, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 November 29, 2010 CONTENTS I. OBJECTIVE 2 II. ZONING AND NOISE CODE REQUIREMENTS 2 III. AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS 3 IV. NOISE IMPACT 3 V. CONCLUSION 5 APPENDIX I 6 APPENDIX 11 8 Environmental Noise Assessment Kenosha Industrial Development I. OBJECTIVE Page 2 of 9 November 29, 2010 The objective of this report is to evaluate the environmental noise impact on the Kenosha Industrial Development, currently proposed for construction, on nearby residential areas. In this report, zoning definitions and noise code requirements for the City of Tumwater are referenced. Predicting the noise source levels of the Kenosha Industrial Development and comparing them to the limits defined by the municipality will determine compliance. The Kenosha Industrial Development is east of 1-5 and will occupy 48 acres southwest of the 93rd Avenue SW and Kimmie Street SW intersection. A campground, approximately 300 feet east of the Kenosha Industrial Development and 1300 feet south of 93rd Avenue SW, is the nearest receiving property with limiting noise code restrictions. For campground location with respect to development site, see the map in Appendix 1 of the report. II. ZONING AND NOISE CODE REQUIREMENTS Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-60, titled "Maximum Environmental Noise Levels", is incorporated into the City of Tumwater Municipal Code under Chapter 18.40.030. Therefore the City of Tumwater conforms to the WAC definitions for zone identification and for maximum persistent allowable noise levels. Under WAC 173-60-030 section "Identification of Environments", the Kenosha Industrial Development falls under the Environmental Designation for Noise Abatement (EDNA) Class C, which includes sites used for storage, warehouse, and distribution. Under WAC 173-60-040 section "Maximum Permissible Environmental Noise Levels", limitations are communicated in the table below. EDNA OF RECEIVING PROPERTY Class A Class B Class C EDNA OF Class A NOISE Class B SOURCE Class C 55 dBA 57 dBA 60 dBA 57 60 65 60 65 70 A campground is identified as Class A under EDNA. The maximum noise level for this site, as a receiver, is 60 dBA for daytime hours between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. The noise limitations are reduced to 50 dBA for nighttime hours between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. The following exceedances to the daytime and nighttime noise level limits are stated below: 5 dBA for a total of 15 minutes in any 1 -hour period; or 10 dBA for a total of 5 minutes in any 1 -hour period; or 15 dBA for a total of 1.5 minutes in any 1 -hour period. Environmental Noise Assessment Kenosha Industrial Development 0 III. AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS Page 3 of 9 November 29, 2010 Ambient noise level measurements were performed on October 28th and October 29th, using a Larson -Davis 820 ANSI certified sound level meter, serial number SN1274. The measurement was taken on the development site, 300 feet south of the site access road that branches west of Kimmie Street SW and approximately 300 feet west of Kimmie Street SW. This measurement location is shown in the map in Appendix I. Sound levels were recorded over a 24-hour period. Average daytime ambient levels were 52.5 dBA. Average nighttime ambient levels were 52.6 dBA. Traffic noise from 1-5 was a large contributor to the ambient noise. The weather during the time of the measurements was rainy and overcast. IV. NOISE IMPACT Low -speed truck movement and truck engine idling will be the primary noise sources for the Development. Truck movement will come from the primary truck entrance route via 93rd Avenue SW (see map). Beyond the entrance of the Kenosha Industrial Development, the truck movement path continues south, parallel to and 463 feet west of Kimmie Street SW. Truck idling can occur at any of the 21 parking spaces in Parking Area 1, north of Building 'B', or in any of 11 parking spaces in Parking Area 2, east of Building "A. This noise assessment considers the case of the maximum possible noise level, which is the full occupancy of the 33 parking spaces in Parking Areas 1 and 2 (see "Parking Area 1" and "Parking Area 2" in the site map presented in Appendix 1). Noise level data for some heavy truck activities are listed below. Primary Truck Noise Levels Heavy truck idling 72 dBA at 25 feet Low speed truck movement (10- 25 mph) 75 dBA at 25 feet Other Truck Noise Levels Truck door opening/closing 65 dBA at 25 feet Air brakes 65 — 75 dBA at 25 feet Pallet being dragged and dropped 75 dBA at 25 feet Pallet jack rolling into truck, hitting bumps, etc 60 dBA at 25 feet Truck engine starting noises 74 dBA at 25 feet Environmental Noise Assessment Kenosha Industrial Development Page 4 of 9 November 29, 2010 Low Speed Truck Movement The Traffic Impact Analysis Report' describes trip generation estimates for the Kenosha Industrial Development. According to the report, PM Peak Hour traffic volumes include 14 trucks entering the site from 93rd Avenue SW and 17 trucks exiting the site via the exit route on Kimmie Street SW. Truck traffic can be expected to occur any time in a 24-hour period. For spherical sound wave propagation in a free -field, sound level decay over distance is predicted using the inverse square law. The 460 feet of distance between the truck movement path and the edge of the campground is sufficient for a sound level reduction of 25 dB. The predicted sound pressure level due to a truck pass -by at low speed at the edge of the campground is 50 dBA, which meets the nighttime noise code limit. Truck Idling Parking Area 1 The campground is 900 feet east of the Parking Area 1. The maximum noise level of Parking Area 1 is the hypothetical case of 21 idling heavy truck engines. The combined sound pressure level for 21 trucks is 85 dBA. After attenuation due to spreading over 900 feet, the predicted noise level due to Parking Area 1 is approximately 42 dBA. Parking Area 2 The maximum possible noise level of Parking Area 2 is the combined sound pressure levels of 11 idling trucks, which is 82 dBA. An earth berm east of Parking Area 2 serves as a noise barrier between the parking area and the campground. Accounting for losses due to spreading and a 9 dB insertion Toss from the berm, the maximum noise level from truck idling is estimated to be 50 dBA at the edge of the neighboring campground. The maximum combined sound pressure levels due to truck idling in Parking Area 1 and 2 is predicted to be 50 dBA at the edge of the campground, which is within compliance of the 50 dBA noise code limit. 1 Shea Carr Jewell Engineering and Planning Services, "Draft Traffic Impact Analysis," Report for Kenosha Industrial Development, prepared for Puget Western Inc., October 2010. fl Environmental Noise Assessment 0 Kenosha Industrial Development V. CONCLUSION Page 5 of 9 November 29, 2010 This environmental noise investigation was necessary to determine the noise impact of the Kenosha Industrial Development on the neighboring campground, a Class "A" receiving property. Losses due to the distance buffer between the Industrial Development and the campground and due to the earth berm east of the site sufficiently mitigate noise impacts to the campground. The sound levels at the edge of the Class A property due to truck activities at the Industrial Development is predicted to meet the 50 dBA nighttime limit and is therefore in compliance with noise codes established by City of Tumwater Municipal Code and the Washington Administrative Code. Sincerely, SSA Acoustics, LLP Dee Trang Nguyen TECHNICIAN SSA ACousTlcs, LLP 222 Etruria St, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 839-0819 — P (206) 839-0824 — F William Stewart MANAGING PARTNER Environmental Noise Assessment Kenosha Industrial Development VI. APPENDIX 1 Page 6 of 9 November 29, 2010 0 Environmental Noise Assessment Kenosha Industrial Development 0 99RD AVENUE E SW D lrx' 100LIW1 /VS .m 43313w get • MOH NfttNO N e t c 0 ; P• [i ;if 660 IA R -li • 4 � 44 1155 3 •1UUh. :-j f J .- ,� 1 Page 7 of 9 November 29, 2010 A ;it giN \min IIIV®n II It ON In101 }1W%i(T1j11Wfl011T0J 'WI( If(04111000 iI (iMryt tt'b W Waid L 1350 1131.1•33AO pp r .�A e5r �% 2, n...�+....s,•-*�.s—..+„r..... .,01-0n.r, no. w r QB�.I fIN 1331 R67. M 100M tet0r0a0101, (MOM -0701 au 31303 NANO_ 113.33 PUGET W@718H 19515 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY WEE 315 BC6TFEi1, WA neon +.rf ..5s+ i.+...+...., rs....r....1+n+ ... 1111.1WA1131 EAST 1 5 OETIRE l►ION CENTER PAELLIURV BITE PLAN Environmental Noise Assessment Kenosha Industrial Development VII. Appendix II Hourly Noise Levels (dBA) Page 8 of 9 November 29, 2010 N N W W A A to VI 01 01 V V CO 0 l!r 0 to 0 N 0 tr 0 Vr 0 N 0 10 AM — 11 AM — 12 PM — 1PM — 2PM — 3PM — 4PM — 5 PM — 6PM — 7 PM — 8PM — 9 P — 10 PM — 11 PM — 12 AM — 1AM — 2AM — 3AM — 4AM — 5AM — 6AM — 7AM — 8AM — 9AM — Date: City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist JAN 28 2014 City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist fik ve_LUPMEN f 1/28/14 PETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION Applicant Name: Steve Peterson Street Address: 13100 48th Avenue South City, State, Zip: Tukwila, WA 98168 Telephone: (206) 433-0149 DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. H:1Cand Use Applications in PDIISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 1 City oo Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 c1YEjontinue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. CN—("))Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 (ES y2ontinue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete YE_.- Checklist Complete H:\Land Use Applications in PDPSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 2 0 City oo Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. (:;;D:0 Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-3 YES Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stonnwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) CYE Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) H:1Land tJse Applications in PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 3 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Greerl/Duwarnish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and • otential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. (NO) Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. (NeD Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 City o Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Greeu/Duwaruish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches forrned from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the GreenlDuwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwanush or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 H:\Land Use Applications in PDF''SEPA Environmental Review Application -Jan: 011.doc Page 5 City o Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) H:1Land Use Applications in PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND Use separate sheets as necessary. RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2014 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Peterson Truck Fueling Station • COMMON' 1 Y DEVELOPMENT 2. Name of Applicant: Carl Nelson 3. Date checklist prepared: 1/27/14 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction to begin summer 2014 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None at this time 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A geotechnical study will be prepared for this proposal H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Agency Comments Page 1 D SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. City of Tukwila Design Review Administrative, Washington State Department of Ecology 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Construction of new 3300 square good canopy for truck diesel fueling - includes 6 dispensers, 2 underground storage tanks with 50,000 fallow capacity 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 13100 - 48th Avenue South Parcel Number: 000300-0045 Legal Description: see plans 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doc Page 2 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 30% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Unknown d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minimal grading required for drainage. Soil to be exported from tank hole evacuation. All exported soil will be tested per state requirements. Any fill material will come from an approved borrowed site determined by the geotechnical engineer H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 3 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion could occur during construction but it is anticipated to not be significant g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 85% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion control plan in accordance with city/county standards will be in place during construction. Silt fencing and filter fabric will be used to protect catch basins 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction there will be construction equipment exhaust. The emissions will be temporary with no lasting effect b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off-site emissions or odors will affect our proposal H:Vand Use Applications in PDP\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 4 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Operation and installation of the fueling station will comply with all federal, state and local air quality regulations. Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery will be used. Vent risers have pressure caps to prevent unnecessary release of vapors to the atmosphere. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 5 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. On-site storm water will discharge to designed storm retention system H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 6 C� O Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Drainage from paving areas to be collected and treated by Contech Stormfilter catch basins. Detention provided by a detention chamber system with a discharge to the existing storm drain within 48th Avenue South. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Detention and water quality treatment to be provided. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Remove (3) ex. fir trees and all ex. grass. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping per City code. H:\Iand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 8 Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ✓ Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs ✓ Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Remove (3) ex. fir trees and all ex. grass. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping per City code. H:\Iand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric for lighting and to provide power for pumps H:Vand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 1.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 9 D c� Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Will comply with Washington State energy codes 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes, environmental health risks would include exposure to gasoline during fueling of automobiles, risk of fire and potential for contamination of environment by petroleum products in the remote event of a spill or release of fuel 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services will be required other than those that presently exist. Including medical, police and fire 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Fuel is stored in double walled underground storage tanks with electronic sensors. Fuel is routed through double walled piping with electronic sensing devices. Vent and vapor lines are also double walled. Dispensers are equipped with automatic shut off devices and sumps to contain leaks. Tanks are equipped with spill buckets around the fill tube and are equipped with overfill protection devices H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 10 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. On a short term basis construction noises from trucks and equipment during daylight hours. Long term noise will be that generated by typical automobile and truck traffic 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Mufflers will be used on all construction equipment 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is a vacant restaurant. Adjacent properties are: north - hotel, south - gas station, west - trucking company, east - interstate 5 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 11 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Describe any structures on the site. Restaurant d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, all structures e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CG - general commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Unknown g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 12 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Unknown i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? One j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be in compliance with the City of Tuckwila Municipal Code. A fuel station use is allowed within the CLI zone H:V,and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 13 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Describe any structures on the site. Restaurant d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, all structures e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CG - general commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Unknown g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A H:Uand Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 12 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Unknown i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? One j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the,proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans if any: The project will be in compliance with the Walla Walla Municipal Code. A fuel station use is allowed within the CH zzne t;; H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 13 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 19'-6" b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The primary source of light and glare will be from the under canopy lights which will be illuminated during evening hours. Lenses will be flush mounted instead of dropped to reduce glare b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The Lens type will be used to control glare H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 15 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Green river trail Fosters Link golf course b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 16 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Sit4e is accessed via 48th Avenue South b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Bus stop is +/- 175 yards away at the intersection of 48th Avenue South and Interurban c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have (9) parking spaces and (12) fueling positions. Approximately 73 parking spaces will be eliminated H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 17 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes. existing driveways will be relocated and increased in width to accommodate truck traffic e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 150 vehicle trips will be generated daily g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None proposed 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No H:\Land Use Applications in PDF SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 18 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity, water, refuse service, telephone. All utilities required for this project are currently servicing the site H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Page 19 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? None Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine Life? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A H:\ and Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 20 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? None Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None H:\ and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 21 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? None Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 1/27/14 H:\Land Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 22 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98.188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: .1)1(71111in ii i:r.r'il�_ilri(1; .q;.. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss The undersigned being duly wom and upon oath states as follows: S rat N.,9AA, P-'1 / t G t C 1 iS 1. lana -the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by nae-er-my-gents-orad-ar ue-and-cer-rect te-tl.e-h st ef-:ry knowledge. my tenant. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 13 3 (D 71.1.2d 2 tt 4 ).-1 Ad» , for the purpose of plication review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. an loss or dama ' e to , erso •—' �:..w..��.uatr U _ Y. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. ��pAO/'If EXECUTED at / /= i (city), ) (state), on 1 , 20 r (Print Name) e.o. (o X (Address) 2-0 6 22`12 (2 5 3 (Phone Number) J� Signature) PI 4 ,e/A 6 rA G t"1 &ti d On this day personally appeared before me L ©Lir r.R. f/�r ri- 1.9 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. 0 ler B af/A C / ©/"= S',oz fj. n� y xa``. (^^fit,a"1 ! t. r',-- LCC /` ,, `N\\\\\\111) f ,�^ suBSCRattIz E ' :Q BEFORE ME ON THIS l9 DAY OF it/ orok— ( tf , 20 Py-' S _ ;p _ y i :v -Z i =O:::: /�' ''11, 2-19-N9),6:-77 111I' OF wp,5% $— l l t N\\\VOS% !{.'\Land Use Applications in PDFDesign Review -Public i{earingJan2011.doc NU ARY residing My Commission expires on COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: ✓ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. ✓ 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). ✓ 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". ✓ 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. 1 PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: .16. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 7. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. 8. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. H:\Land Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.Doc Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 1 9. Vicinity Map with site location. 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. 1 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". H:\Land Use Applications In PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.Doc It!) RF" T CITY OF TUKWILA JAN 2 8 2014 Department of Community Development SEPA 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9»J 8L•v' ""I`ENVIRONMENTAL Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 REVIEW E-mail: planning(a,TukwilaWA.gov APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: File Number: £ c:'7/ Application Complete Date: Project File Numbe, Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbe L l %'-623 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Peterson Truck Fueling Station LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 13100 - 48th Avenue South Seattle WA 98168 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 000300-0045 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Carl Nelson Address: 1932 - 1st Avenue Ste 307 Seattle WA 98101 Phone: 206-770-3839 FAX: 206-770-5941 E-mail: carl.nelson@stantec.com Signature: Date: 1/27/14 )(Wt .c,ov"` H:\Land Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc 355 D/;9 I►-36.1 Di IN 45-0" MODIFIED DRIVE EX. DRIVE j . 32 7' 3/W -�- 48TH AVE S 1 O 00 S41'45'43'W 1399.73' (MEAS.) 45-0" 19'-5' I MODIFIED DRIVE PYLON SIGN ea S EXIT ONLY SIGN TYP OF 2 0 O? EX. DRIVE • LANDSCAPE c7 5'-0' IN (-) NEW SIDWALK 45-0" a Z ter 5 n St. A t y "ttm Ttr 1 FUEL PLAN SCALE 1:20 0Q • , j � r/////2T/////// - 0 v• - O rt ✓/iii/ t NORTH (2z) 2 VICINITY MAP SUBJECT SITE LOT SIZE 41.315 SF FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED 0.. _ 0 tl H 25-0" FUELING ISLAND W RH DISPENSER. SEE ELEVATIONS UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS PROPOSED 25 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN PROCESS NEW PROPANE TANK IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 35.119 SF = 85% ZONING: CLI - COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FOSTER STEPHEN -D C # 38 CYRUS C LEWIS DC #37 POR SD DC #38 & POR DC #3704 SECS 11-14 & 15-23-04 DAF - BEG AT CONCRETE MON AT NXN OF C/L OF SEA TRANS LN R/W WITH C/L OF 480-1 AVE SO AF #6313596 TH N 41-45-35 E ALG SD C/L 270 FT TH 548-14-25 E 25 FT TO SELY MGN OF SD AVE & TPOB TH CONT S 48-1425 E 144.98 FT TO NWLY MGN OF PSH NO 1 TH N 52-46-36 E ALG SD NWLY MGN 268.65 FT TH N 48-14-25 W 196.32 FT TO SELY MGN SD AVE TH S 41-45-35 W 263.70 FT TO TPOB TOTAL OF 1.033 AC M/L PARCEL NUMBER: 000300-0045 I'S OFF RAMP LANas (E) WSDOT FENCE 23'47 4J0'-1 ENTER ONLY SIGN TYP OF 2 E /4-dO�/ NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE RE.GE.IVED JAN 28 2014 0 O Lj ) w Perrnh•Seal TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S - Tuckwila, WA 98168 0 L rs Project Number. 20078330/9 file Name: 0102101 v¢n-.ecao Den. Chkd. Dion. W.11M.DD Drawing No. Revision Sheet 1 of - 2 • • CLAD COLUMNS FUEL PUMP 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16 = 1"-0 WEST =1--E�VATION { 3 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16- = 1 -0- SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16 = 1'-0 24• 112 l �6 4� !�Clearance 14•6" — 0 ALIGN TOP OF REDS Maximum height of Red on column is 30' OASIS WHITE OASIS SILVER (decal recommended) �1 111 OASIS RED ` CHARCOAL, GRAY 0 Valance 0 Pump topper (15• x 241 ©Safety Decal © MPD 0 Flag Mount - Fueling Position Amenity "Combo Unit" 0 Clearance Decal OASIS SILVER OR DARK GRAY 5 TYPICAL DETAILS NOT TO SCALE eiet-oxi R JAN 28 2014 DEVLLUF'MLN f 0 CD IS C c ta i 4-)tu 6,;,, TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S • tuckwila, WA 98168 Project Number 2007833019 R. Nome: Drawing 014. Enos YY.LM.00 Draw^, No. Revision Sheet 2 of 2 fz LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED 8'r _ 13"�_ rr 54 0 OF 0 >N • ■ Q G IPI I�x PROPERTY LINE R.O.W. CENTERLINE EASEMENT AC. PAVING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL GRADING CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION 5WALE GRADE BREAK WATER MAIN SEWER MAIN STORM DRAIN FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER GATE VALVE SEWER MANHOLE STORY CB STORY MANHOLE ELECTRICAL UNE TELEPHONE LINE GAS UNE POSER VAULT UTILITY POLE STREET UGHT aoFOWNN NEW 454—WIDE ORWY. L PROPERTY INFO PARCEL N0: 000300-0045 NW 114 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA ...°may _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL N THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, AND OF THE CYRUS C LENTS DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 37, SECTIONS 11, 14 AND 15 TOMNSIIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE TRANSMISSION UNE RIGHT O WAY, WITH 11E CENTERUNE OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS ALE NO. 6313598, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THENCE NORTH 41'45'35' EAST ALONG SAID CENIERUNE 270 00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 4814'25' EAST 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 4819 AVENUE SOUTH AND THE PONT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 4814'25' EAST 144.98 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 1, AS ESTABUSIED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAUSE NO 591370; THENCE NORTH 52'46'36' EAST ALONG SND NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN 268.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4814'25' NEST 196.32 FEET TO THE SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 4819 AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 41'45'35' NEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 263.70 FEET TO THE PONT OF 821366160. BAGS OF REARING SOUTH 88'35'57' EAST, AS MEASURED BETWEEN WGS HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 939-902 AND 93H-901 (NAD 83/91) VTRRCAL DATUM SGS VERTICAL CONTROL PONT N0. 930-513, BEING THE TOP OF FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF S. 144TH ST., 515T AVE. S A110 MACADAM RD. S ELEV. = 160.18 US FEET (NAND 88) --.1--...--- S41'45'43'W 1399.73' (MEAS.) 0 — I N EX. CRTC. 01112 & NEW 45.0'-1I0E WW1'. C1TTER TO MAIM CONC. 1HIEWA .T0 REARM 48TH A_VE. S. l RO FT - —s ATI. 03.70' ,_SIGH 64 i. L = NEW PLANTER EK. FIRE HYDRANT 7�w Cite: S52'4 44.14' 203 78, ABOVE GROUND TANK & CONC. PAD NEW S52'46'44 w 2,8761, GRAPHIC SCALE 10 SO ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch - 20 N. IINTE`E 5 00. SITE VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM CIVIL ENGINEER 1ERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5027 51ST AVENUE SW SEATTLE, WA 98136 CONTACT: PEDRO DEGUZMAN, PE PHONE: (206) 923-0590 EMAIL pedroOnwlink.com GOVERNING AGENCIES GRAGING. DRAINAGE. ROAD. WATER. SEWER CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 50UTIRCENIER BOULEVARD /100 TUKVIU WA 98188 CONTACT: DASD MCPHERSON PHONE (206) 431-2448 PROJECT DATA EHL PROPERTY AREA= 45,000 SF (1.03 AC) NEW PROPERTY AREA= 41,315 SF (0.95 AC) EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SITE STRIPPING = 459 BCY SUBCRME CUT = 351 BCY SUBORADE FILL = 375 BCY • FOR PERMIT USE ONLY EX. IMPERVIOUS AREA= 31,156 SF PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREA— 35.341 SF NET CHANGE IMPERVIOUS AREA= +4185 SF SHEET INDEX C1 02 — PREUMINARY PAVING PLAN PREUMINARY C-R.AD!MC, DRAINAGE & U11UTY PLAN EN-aocv RECEIVED JAN 28 2014 COW/10Ni 1 Y DEVELOPMENT TDG NO. 13035 1 1 8 14 H 1 61 S K Z 0 g1- Lu a Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48th Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 PRELIMINARY PAVING PLAN Projnct Number: 2007833019 Ab Nom= Own, 1844. 0.6". Drawing Na. C1 010001. MIXT - .10101 Revision Sheet 1 01 2 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED —100 — —100 — +90.00 tY 0 Co ul e • ■ O — E - T — G — a PROPERTY UNE R.O.W. CENTERLINE EASEMENT CONCRETE RETAINING WALL GRADING CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION SWALE GRADE BREAK WATER MAIN SEWER MAIN STORM DRAIN FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER GATE VALVE SEWER MANHOLE STORM CB STORM MANHOLE ELECTRICAL UNE TELEPHONE UNE GAS UNE POWER VAULT UTILITY POLE STREET UGHT A Lt/„,. O PSS F �OG4 4' ! es 4,4 <J s C' EX. CB X T PoM. 18.60 �Q 9C.F IE= 14.6600 (EX. 1YNW) 14.(EX. 12.5E) ?`T •"pG Co G9Pt � f J"F EX. SDMH RIO= 18.99 (L04R TO 16.15) 1E= 14.44 (E6. 12 -NW) E. 14.39 (EX. 12.5E) 1E= 14.43 (EX. 12'56) • E. 14.51 (10 15*NE) STORMTECH CHAMBER DETENTION SYSTEM IE(OUT)= 15.00 SEE 011- 1/C2 .X•° Gy POWER POLE``Acg W/TRANSORMER.. *- LUMINAIRE, AND UG WIRE ‘-'6;54 FOR INFORMATION CALL STORMTECH (866) 647-3362 SC -740 END CAP SC -740 CHAMBER 3/4 - INCH CLEAN, OPEN GRADED, ANGULAR AGGREGATE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA GRANULAR WELL GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <359 FINES. COMPACT IN 6 IN LIFTS TO 959 PROCTOR DENSITY. SEE THE TABLE OF ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS IN STORMTECH'S DESIGN MANUAL, INSTALLATION MANUAL, OR WWW.STORMTECH.COM. PAVEMENT GRADE VARIES PER PLAN 19.0 616. OVER STORMTECH • EL= 17.50 EX. SOB AASHTO M288 CLASS 2 NON -WOVEN GEOTEXT1LE ALL AROUNO STONE 51• NTN. ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY TO BE FIELD TESTED EL= 15.00: 80T. OF LIVE -STORAGE EL= 14.51. uT 6 CHAMBER EL= 14.00: BOT. OF EXCAVATION FIELD 0001009 ENGINEER TO CONFIRM ADEQUATE BASE THICKNESS PROPOSED 18 CHAMBERS PRVD VOL (EL 15.0.17.01= 843 CF STORMTECH DETENTION (SC -740 SECTION) SCALE N.T.S. 9y oo 20 8 4- 447 416,1, o L O GTIiJJ-`�3 9e„.l S41'45'43'W 1399.73' (MEAS.) ■ rill ' e ECXAO.,NNCSNON. (LRTON-SWE-RWP�LK170.RENNN•' s1�2-N4T'45'43"E 263.70' 1• .2_.�. 20 C- • _'D,1 arY 2- .i■)07 ap;SEN�I i® MAI . �yY7� 111.Mi) h . NM 1.01.4 P. I P ■■ imea.... I o�lMIIF •., • , NEW 1- DOMESTIC RPBA & HOTBOX. NEW 1' 11909. DEDUCT METER & DCVA. EX. c SIDE' EX. FIRE HYDRANT `e E1 C0 RET1 BIN: 1 IE= 14.999 (19 (IX. 2- N _ x GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 20 It. 4's ''4b'▪ Sx• INTE`E5 20 x— d, "<)P 9� — cn O0 0 6/11-000 JAN 2 8 2014 Ci�IiY'11:,�11 •1 X 1 DEVELOPMENT TDG NO. 13035 Z 00 co tit a Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 4891 Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 69 Z 0- --I Z E >- < J 0 >- 0,6 a2S Lu -71 • Z LLJ 674 a0 Project Number. 2007833019 911e Nome: Own. ChM. Degn. W.1M.D0 Drawing No. C2 Revision Sheet 2 0( 2 cE5,. 'TS NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA 1/28/14 , o OJ 2 -1185. 1 PER EACH 1 3 LP UL 8222.1101468222.1101468222.110146S-5 TEEN0 - -MORS,PER EACH 7 1.F.ETn1 , A91c CUE Gf19 « 141.AN1E0 BERM (-r SWUM) 48TH AVE. S. -aCIMOCO ER StaL O® (184 FEET) 1 In. - 20 TL INTERSTATE IRE 1 LANDSCAPING 00E -WES 1 PLR EACH 20 1F MIMING CURB2119 (.9 TREES) -52X16 1 PEN EACH 5 LF. E%QLOINC CIMS CUTS (.35 SAWS) -010U000HA PLANT SCHEDULE TREES SOENDBC NAME STIBOL _ CA90.1 NAVE VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TERRAFORMA DESIGN CROUP, INC. 5027 51ST AVENUE SW SEAT11E, WA 98136 CONTACT: MEM SAKAIDA, LA PHONE (206) 923-0590 EMAIL akemiOntdinkcan GOVERNING AGENCIES PLANNING 01Y OF TUKWILA 6300 SCUTHCENTER BOULEVARD /100 10K12LA, WA 98188 CONTACT: MINNIE DHAUWAL PHONE (206) 431-3670 EMAIL mnniedhaliwolOWkw8awa.gov 00211113 92E (N4.) 9'AONG (MAX) NOTES STAIE OT /119/101111 REOSBIED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANEW WAE MAMMA Gf4RMAIE NO 794 Mums 94/,9164 SHRUBS 5119809 EA5AG GEES 10 BE RENOWD OADRA5115 LUTEA 10.108 WOW NALUS TED BARRA' REO BARRON CRABAPPLE THUJA PUCATA 'FASlQATA' HOGAN CEDAR 50041010 NAME COMMA NINE OGNF9G RENEWN. PRIOR TO COISIRUCIK4. REMOTE 51UNP,40015 AND ALL OEDR. 5 2 CAL. (MN.) AS SHORN MATCHINGFOB1, 9211E TRUNK NN. BRANCHING 401. 5' MATCHING FAN, SINGLE MRINN, 13 Y CAL (MN.) 20. MN. BRANCH HEIAT 5' 3 6' TALL AS 91022 9NOE 1RUN1. FULL 0004811 921 (9*.) SPACNG (MAX) 80115 ii Q GROUNDCOVER 84000:EN5RCN PO' 13 5 G0LA AS 540X84 FULL. MATCHING PJM RH0000ENDROI PINUS MUCNO 2 GALLA AS 9108* FULL. MATCHING 9UO10 PINE RIBE5 SANG -2401M 6 3 GAL194 A5 910284 FULUOLTI-51091 1L08ERNG =RANT *BURNUN DANDY 33 2 CALLA A5 94084 FULL NUO BRANCHED DAVID'S VIBURNUM VIBURNUM AnUS 41 2 GALLA A5 9401184 FULL MATCHING SPRING BOUQUET *BUWNUM 5001000 NAME COWA NAME 2011: - SHRUBS TO BE 18 TALL 12ANUM. INCREASE CONT0NER 92E 10 MEET REOIWEMEMT. 00ANDT5 92E (IBM.) SPAAG (MAX) 80105 CA455 4500 9 PERENNIAL Rt£ INN H1DR05EE0 IEUCRI09 CHA 422415 (ERMANDER *NCA NMA. PEWWNNLE 25149. PER NFO 9E02N4120AOAS N0 NET 5OO F DURING 8ANTER 34516 150 1 GALLON 24 ' 1RIANOILAR FULL, MULTI 5104*13, HE21HT 2C I12RAUR FULL. BUSHY, NUR-51FN TDG NO. 13035 :LING STATION ARY PLANTING PL C(')!, M) JNI 1 Y 1 VI_L(JPMENT Plo)..t Nrnbms 2007833019 FL Nom.: Own. 0,011. 0.an. WAGLO0 Drawing NO. Li aoALSIM -ALolo /1/ -coo/ Revision Sheet 1 of 1 PETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48TH AVE S PL14-003 L14-0003 DR L14-0004 BLA E14-0001 S E PA L14-0003 DESIGN REVIEW City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director June 4, 2014 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Carl Nelson, Applicant Strander, LLC, Owner Washington State Department of Ecology King County Department of Assessment Parties of Record This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L14-0003 Applicant: Carl Nelson Type of Permit Applied for: Administrative Design Review. Project Description: Demolition of the existing building and construction of "a truck fueling station with associated site improvements including underground tanks, parking, driveway, and landscaping. Location: 13100 48th Ave S Associated Files: E14-0001 (Environmental Review) L14-0004 (Boundary Line Adjustment) Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: Commercial/Light Industrial II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the administrative design review does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 -days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by June 18, 2014. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee per the current fee schedule, additional hourly charges may apply. In addition all hearing examiner costs will be passed through to the appellant. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Hearing Examiner decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206-431-3684 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period if no appeal is filed. Jack ace, Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayo) Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PREPARED JUNE 3, 2014 NOTIFICATION: On March 3, 2014, Notice of application was posted on site and mailed to the surrounding property owners and occupants. FILE NUMBER: L14-0003 APPLICANT: Carl Nelson OWNER: Strander LLC REQUESTS: Design Review approval to construct a truck fueling station with associated site improvements including underground tanks, parking, driveway, and landscaping. ASSOCIATED PERMITS: SEPA and Development Permit LOCATION: 13100 48th Ave S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNATION: Commercial/Light Industrial (C/LI) STAFF: Minnie Dhaliwal ATTACHMENTS: A. Drawings: Site Plan, Elevations, and Landscape Plan. B. Applicant's response to Design Review criteria. FINDINGS VICINITY/SITE INFORMATION Project Description The proposal is to demolish the existing restaurant building and construct a new 3,300 square foot canopy for a truck diesel fueling station including six dispensers and two underground storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 50,000 gallons. Also, proposed is an above ground 2,000 gallon propane storage tank. The proposal includes associated site improvements including driveways, parking and landscaping. Surrounding Land Uses The project site is located along 48th Ave S. There is a gas station to the south west; a hotel to the north east; and Truck dealership to the north. The site is bordered by I-5 to the south. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA This project is subject to Administrative design review under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18.60.030. In the following discussion the design review criterion is shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. For the applicant's response to the criteria, see Attachment B. 18.60.050 General Review Criteria 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. Page 2 of 6 a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement; b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. a) The fueling canopy is about 25 feet by 132 feet and is oriented in the north south direction in the center of the subject site. This is to allow easy access to enter and exit. The remainder of the site is designed to meet the circulation needs of large trucks that will be using the site. This property will be developed as an integrated site with the adjacent property to the west (the existing gas station). Since the entire development will border two streets (Interurban Ave and S. 48th St) the setback along 48th Ave S is proposed as a second front setback, which is 12.5 feet. There is no pedestrian circulation anticipated on the site as it is a truck fueling station. Perimeter landscaping along with a fence that acts as an acoustical barrier is proposed along the north east property line, helps provide a buffer from the adjacent use. On the south side there is an off ramp from the freeway and some plantings are proposed along the south property line. b) A screen wall is proposed around the trash enclosure. There is no designated parking area but there is a large paved area that is necessary for trucks to circulate. Perimeter landscaping helps screen the paved area. c) The proposed fueling canopy is 19'-6" high. Also, there is a small utility building that is 16 feet by 8 feet and 9'4" high. The materials for the utility building are composition roof and siding. The maximum height allowed in the Commercial/Light Industrial Zone is 45 feet. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character; d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged; e. Compatibility of on-site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. The proposed canopy is about 19'6" in height and is located in the center of the site with circulation area around. The site is accessed by two driveways along 48th Ave South. Existing sidewalk along 48th Ave S is proposed to remain. There are other fueling stations Page 3 of 6 in the immediate vicinity so the proposed structure is in keeping with scale of the neighboring properties. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade; d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged; f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combina- tion; g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Pursuant to TMC 18.70.090, the site must meet all landscaping requirements if a design review application is required for the proposal. A larger landscape island is proposed along the front. Five feet of perimeter landscape island is proposed along all other sides. Garbage/recycling area will be screened. There is no opportunity to have interior landscaping due to paved space requirements for truck maneuvering. Details of the light fixture shall be reviewed at the time of building permit and lighting shall be shielded to prevent off-site glare. 4. Building Design. a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; c. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; Page 4 of 6 d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. The proposed fueling canopy is similar to other gas stations. The standard corporate colors of red and blue are proposed. The small utility building has dark gray composition roof and light gray siding and is proposed to house ground utility apparatus. Landscaping is proposed around the utility building to help screen it. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale; b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. As referenced earlier an enclosure is proposed around the garbage/recycling collection area. An acoustic barrier is proposed along the north east property line. A separate sign permit will be required for the approval of the signs. Please note that per TMC 19.20.050 the maximum area of any sign on a fuel canopy shall not exceed five square feet. Per TMC 19.36.040 (C) (2), when an application is submitted to the City for a project that is subject to design review, all non -conforming free-standing signs (not included are the freeway interchange sign) lose their nonconforming status. Since the site is considered one integrated development site with the adjacent existing 76 Gas Station, the existing freestanding sign on the 76 gas station site is required to be brought into compliance as a result of this design review application. CONCLUSIONS (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. The design of the site reflects the functional requirements of the use. The fuel canopy is located in the center of the subject site with truck circulation area around it. A small utility building is proposed to house ground utility apparatus. Page 5 of 6 There are two access driveways with one for entering and one for exiting the site. This will help in the vehicular circulation on the site. (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. The fuel canopy is 19'6" high and is in scale with structures around the site. The proposed utility building is a relatively small structure that will be softened by landscaping. (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment. Perimeter landscaping along 48th Ave S will help provide a good transition from the site to the sideway. Perimeter landscaping on the side and rear property lines will provide some greenery and help soften the large paved area. (4) Building Design. The fueling canopy is similar to other gas stations and appropriate for the use and location. The standard corporate colors of red and blue are proposed. The gray composition roof and gray siding of the small utility building combined with the adjacent landscaping will minimize its visual impact. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. The garbage/recycling collection area will be appropriately screened by an enclosure. An acoustic barrier is proposed along the north east property line to mitigate the noise impacts of the new use. A separate sign permit will be required for the approval of the signs. Any new proposed signs will have to meet Sign Code requirements. The existing freestanding sign along Interurban Ave will be required to be brought into compliance per TMC 19.36.040(C)(2) RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Design Review application as proposed. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. A sign permit is required prior to installing any signs. Please note that per TMC 19.20.050 the maximum area of any sign on a fuel canopy shall not exceed five square feet. Also, per TMC 19.36.040 (C) (2), when an application is submitted to the City for a project that is subject to design review, all non -conforming free-standing signs lose their nonconforming status. Since the site is considered one integrated development site with the adjacent existing 76 Gas Station, the existing freestanding sign on the 76 gas station site is required to be brought into compliance as a result of this design review application. 2. Underground fuel tank installations shall comply with IFC Chapters 23, 57 and NFPA 30. Underground fuel tanks shall be designed/engineered to prevent uplift during high water table conditions. Liquid Propane tank installation shall comply with IFC Chapter 61. Page 6 of 6 at* o f gamma Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Mailer's signature: VI ,L-------_______ x Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _3rd day of March, 2014_ Project Name: Peterson Truck Refueling Station Project Number: PL14-0003 Associated File Number (s): E14-0001 Mailing requested by: Min' ie P' i aliwal Mailer's signature: VI ,L-------_______ W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Teri Svedahl From: Teri Svedahl Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:22 AM To: sepa (sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov) Cc: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: Tukwila Project -76 Gas Station Attachments: 76-_SEPA.pdf; corrected_notice.pdf Attached is the checklist and a corrected notice for a Gas/Diesel refueling station in Tukwila. If you have any questions, please contact Minnie Dhaliwal at Minnie.DahliwlaCc@TuwkwilaWA.gov Thank you, Sve lia. Administrative Support Technician City of Tukwila - Building & Planning Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard - Ste 100 Tukwila WA 98188 Teri.Svedahl@TukwilaWA.gov SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS The City of opportunity, the community of choice. City of Tukwila Notice of Application Environmental Review of Peterson Truck Fueling Station Project Description: Demolition of the existing building and construction of a truck fueling station that includes a new 3300 square feet canopy, fuel dispensers and two underground storage tanks. The city is reviewing the design review and SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) application for the proposed store. File #'s: PL14-0003 (E14-0001) Property Owner: Strander LLC Applicant: Carl Nelson Project Planner: Minnie Dhaliwal 206-431-3685 or Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov Site Address: 7310( 48th Ave'S Comments and Appeals: Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA 98188 or via email to Minnie Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov. Comments must be received before or on March 17, 2014, by 5:OOpm. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling 206-431- 3685. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIN FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMIN US E.P.A. OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY WSDOT NW REGION WA STATE COMMUNITY DEV DEPT OF ECOLOGY WA DEPT OF ECOLOGY WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE KC HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE KC METRO TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL QWEST COMMUNICATIONS SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT COMCAST BP OLYMPIC PIPELINE VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #125 WASTE MANAGEMENT MUCKLESHOOT Cultural Resources Program MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program MUCKLESHOOT Wildlife Program DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN UP COALITION JACKSON FEDERAL BLDG DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NW REGIONAL OFFICE SEPA REVIEW ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING -OAP ACCOUNTING DIVISION PERMITS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY DIV Laura Murphy Karen Walter Mike Middleton SEPA REVIEW 711 S CAPITOL WAY, STE 501 915 2nd AVE, STE 3142 1200 6th AVE PO BOX 48343 PO BOX 330310, MS 240 PO BOX 48300 3190 160th AVE SE PO BOX 47703 PO BOX 40117 201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-NR-0505 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A 401 FIFTH AVE, STE 1100 PO BOX 1209 201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-TR-0431 23315 66th AVE S PO BOX 34023 PO BOX 90868 23828 30th AVE S 12645 STONE AVE N 2319 LIND AVENUE SW PO BOX 69550 PO BOX 68147 8111 -1st AVE S 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 4705 W MARGINAL WAY SW 1904 3rd AVENUE, STE 105 210 S Hudson Street, Ste 332 OLYMPIA WA 98501 SEATTLE WA 98174 SEATTLE WA 98101 OLYMPIA WA 98504 SEATTLE WA 98133 OLYMPIA WA 98504 BELLEVUE WA 98008 OLYMPIA WA 98504 LACEY WA 98504 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98111 SEATTLE WA 98104 KENT WA 98032 SEATTLE WA 98124 BELLEVUE WA 98009 KENT WA 98032 SEATTLE WA 98133 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98168 SEATTLE WA 98168 SEATTLE WA 98108 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 SEATTLE WA 98106 SEATTLE WA 98101 SEATTLE WA 98134 0 0 FirstName * Louise * * In The Box * * * PETERSON * * TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA QUINO'S SUBS STARBUCK'S CAFE SUNNY TERIYAKI AARON JOHNSON LastName DHILLON & SONS LLC SEATTLE CITY OF SCL Strander HEARTWOOD PROPERTIES L L C WA STATE DOT Jack PACWEST ENERGY LLC DEM L L C INTERURBAN 13038 LLC 76 STATION HIC I LLC KTR CAPITAL PARTNERS COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER AGENCY Address 13050 48TH AVE S PO BOX 34023 PO BOX 88636 9322 14TH AVE 5 PO BOX 330310 PO BOX 4900 3450 COMMERCIAL CT 13123 48TH AVE S 10655 NE 4TH ST # 901 13310 INTERURBAN AVE S PO BOX 700 300 BARR HARBOR DR # 150 13400 INTERURBAN AVE S 13138 INTERURBAN AVE 5 13050 INTERURBAN AVE 5 13123 INTERURBAN AVE S 13001 48TH AVE 5 12900 48TH AVE 5 12855 48TH AVE 5 13038 INTERURBAN AVE S #140 13038 INTERURBAN AVE S #110 13038 INTERURBAN AVE S #130 13038 INTERURBAN AVE S #120 CityState SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SCOTTSDALE AZ MERIDIAN ID SEATTLE WA BELLEVUE WA TUKWILA WA MERCER ISLAND WA CONSHOHOCKEN PA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA Zip 9816$ 98124 98138 98108 98133 85261 83642 98168 98004 98168 98040 19428 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 Stantec RECENED JAN 28 2014 Project: Peterson Truck Fueling Station Date: January 27, 2014 nrvo\Ni `'MINT Reference: Written discussion of project consistency with design criteria The proposed development will be utilized as a truck diesel fueling station. There will be no pedestrian accessible services provided. The only services provided will be that what is provided by vehicle traffic for fueling services. 1. Relationship of structure to site. The structure on the site will be a 132'X25' x 19'-6" high canopy to provide cover to the fueling dispensers. The canopy will be oriented as such to provide the easiest enter and exit access for large trucks that will be accessing the site. The height and scale of the building is in line with the size of the site. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. There are 3 other fueling stations in the immediate area so this proposed structure is in line with the established character in the neighborhood. Landscape transitions will be provided between the site and adjacent properties. The site is set up as one way in and one way out to improve on-site traffic circulation and circulation of traffic from the site and to the public street. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment. The proposed development is a simple fueling station with large vehicles coming on and off the site. Because this bulk of the property is required to be utilized for the functional purposes of a fueling station and is very flat there is not any opportunity to provide any treatment within the site. However the entire perimeter of the property will be fully landscaped to provide the visual focus of the site. 4. Building Design. The architectural style of the building is simply a fueling canopy that you see on all standard gas stations. The store will be branded as a 76 station and will utilize the standard corporate colors of red and blue. This architectural style is in line with the adjacent gas stations in the immediate area. 5. Mis. Structure and Street Furniture. There is no street furniture provided and the only other structure on the site will be an enclosure to screen the refuse collection area . Design with community in mind F:\Written Narrative(1).doc CITY OF TUKA Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 tr" 1\1. Tukwila, WA 98188 4 �- y http://www.TukwilaWA.gov ( • i•-(a1,M4-tA Date Applicati6h Accepted: O(/7// i l Date Applicatton Expires: 0'-'. 73p/(Cf/ z _ � { •t office use orily) `; TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. **Please Print** SITE LOCATION Site Address: I 3100 oO 4E di Gug 3 O King Co. Assessor's Tax No.: 000 3 0000 5 Suite Number: Tenant Name: -1 c -f er_sr r cK FDS ( Ski i/pv PROPERTY OWNER Name: Name: -`1-(--k 1 i £\/ R - Lb Ci`Ck t .Y,S0 k) Address: . Zip: Phone: Fax: City: State: Zi CONTACT PERSON — person receiving all project communication Name: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Type of Existing Use: Is existing building vacant? Type of work: `I ❑ New ❑ Addition Type of Proposed Use: Change of use Size of Existing Use: For how long? ❑ Remodel Size of Proposed Use: ❑ Tenant Improvement PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES Expiration — The concurrency test notice shall expire 90 days after issuance unless the applicant submits a SEPA or other documentation pursuant to TMC 21.04. If the submittal is made within 90 days, the test notice shall be valid for one calendar year from the date of issuance of the notice. Once the associated development permit or building permit is approved, the final concurrency certificate shall be valid for 2 years or as long as the developer possesses a valid building permit for the development. Extensions may be granted in accordance with TMC 9.50. Transferability — A certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land, but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. A certificate of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land use, density, and intensity described in the application for a development permit or building permit. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE '1 D AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LA S O THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHOR Signature: ---"" .✓ Print Name: AGENT: Mailing Address: 1-33 [ C7 Svc croc Date: i -- r9.4 ` (L( Day Telephone: 06`./33 J e`(, c'{ 14u� 5 Toku:(Lcz tot\ ct (6R City State Zip H.\Applications1Forms-Applications On Line/012 Applications\Trac Concurrency Application 2-9-12 docx bh Page 1 of 2 TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2014 (;OMMUNI 1 Y DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT PETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION LOCATION: 13100 48th Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 ISSUE DATE: January 28, 2014 PREPARED FOR: Peterson PREPARED BY: Terraforma Design Group, Inc. 5027 51st Avenue SW Seattle, WA 98136 TDG No. 13035 1/28/14 1I; CIVIL ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 5027 51' Avenue SW, Seattle, WA 98136 phone 206.923.0590 website www.terraformadesigngroup.com PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Overview 1 II. Conditions and Requirements Summary 6 III. Off -Site Analysis 8 IV. Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Design 8 V. Conveyance System Design 20 VI. Special Reports & Studies 20 VII. Other Permits 20 VIII. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Design 20 IX. Bond Quantities, Facilities Summaries, 20 and Declaration of Covenant X. Operation and Maintenance Manual 20 Terraforma Design Group, Inc. PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed development consists of the removal of an existing restaurant building and parking lot and construction of a new commercial fueling facility on a 1.03 acre site. The property is located at 13100 48th Avenue South, in Tukwila, Washington. The County parcel number is 000300- 004775. This Preliminary Technical Information Report will be submitted with the Design Review Application for the project. The proposed commercial construction requires a sitework permit from the City of Tukwila and compliance with the 2010 City of Tukwila Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards (CTIDCS). The project will also include a boundary line adjustment with the neighboring property to the west. The property consists of an abandoned restaurant building and parking lot. The site is predominately impervious with narrow planters along the site perimeter. Site topography is generally flat. The parking lot drains to two existing catch basins which outlet to the existing 15 -inch public storm drain near the back of sidewalk. Existing soils are classified as glacial till. No drainage enters our property from adjacent parcels. We do not know of any existing drainage problems on- site or downstream. The site is part of the Duwamish River Basin, upstream of Mile 6. Since the development will result in greater than 2000 sf of new or replaced impervious surface, Full Drainage Review will be required. Per Figure 5.9.1 Drainage Basins and Flow Control Standards of the CTIDCS, our flow control standard will be "Level 2 Conservation to Existing". Water quality treatment will also be required. Due to the existing structure and paving, this project is classified as Redevelopment for the purposes of drainage criteria review. N St •43- .7 57th'Ave South -41Mnn Park P� 3 b ; 5,.3Gh ,;, a a � 4 .71 5137th 5t N Nn „ S13Ttn" tart P r w `cif VICINITY MAP 4. Terraforma Design Group, Inc. PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND " rneters, EXISTING SITE AERIAL Terraforma Design Group, Inc. PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND SECTION 5.9 SURFACE WATER MAPS 5.9.1 Drainage Basins and Flow Control Standards Terraforma Design Group, Inc. 3 w. tit 1 Mercer island Seattle i r b7:11„,{-4' Ith Mer' { King County m 3, .i _` 1.1 Riverton Creek'�ii ` . '• Basin i1 irr Duw. • sh King County d River tL Buren j _. '` SITE Southgate t , • f Creek ` - j BasinAiiikar �� `-fir ! � r _ l'° ' Renton t r�, Gil SeaTac ' t•.—� Tit „y i .. r - ' i 7 Basin _ • "a 1 � on Place illikg Acre S, :;, e FIlm .., Sta $ on Basi .7 ^• /beast f ...• D Basin - d r, Kent lla res Tukwi , Lower Mil _ J �"! So in, Creek Basin `� , ! Moine I 1 htrtNM NY YaNq:krMIRA./Net rPSl El It* Level 2 Conservation Neighboring Jurisdictions - Drainage amine N A Water Bo /Wetland dY Qested BasinBoundaryr to Existing LevetZ -Conservation Bascto — Peakfate and Raw Canto! Said a Rh C R./ al Ilinda Tukwila to Existing gird a os 1 Per Tukwila South i= k,.. • Pump Station � Development Agreement r�.i:l 1k:, Terraforma Design Group, Inc. 3 4 EXISTING LANDCOVER CONDITIONS Aplanter= 10159 sf = 0.23 ac Apaving,roof= 31156 sf = 0.72 ac Atotal= 41315 sf = 0.95 ac • — a — — —)E • . . . . , P(OH) • ow <8> . . , P(014) NM PCO(4) P(OH) P(11E1). . 'KOH) o •• 1 -',.- PIPPF- - _ _ ° 48TH AVENUE SOUTH 22 .0., - ---------------- . —,, .. — . p ; 4 IIIL i::1 • , v • i7',9 rliO1 Bouoy Line r- Adjust 11 1 ,, ;; 1 ii : • • I LJ. .. . 4.• 1:4 / ,. ,- 1 r '4 7,-,-,-,,,;;;; ,.1 -I • :4 . 11 II 11 , • , I ',t- I 2- 11 90 ,4o9 NV. I... ::4 - c)\‘' • 0- , ) , 0- • 4-. 90 41\9 •: , ,: . • :: .. „4. ::4 I IA . Ur , ' ;1 -j <> :4 . ., ., ,. ,. „ il .; \os" n •. ' I - _ o '''''-..-1.• - : '.::- , - , -'-' 1 k VIP - IK 4 X1 INTERSTATES 40 . II-. 975 \ ,.., ,,,...' ...„,.••. 004 ., - ., ., : : ,, .. :-.7":"_i) „ " ,, ii - 9 X I , 4 0 0 1:t 4k - 1, l_hk- 1 inch = 40 ft. PETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA DRAINAGE BASIN MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS by Pedro DeGuzmon, PE Terraforma Design Group, Inc. DATE: 1/28/14 4 DEVELOPED LANDCOVER CONDITIONS Aplanter- 5974 sf = 0.14 ac Aroof= 3300 sf = 0.08 ac Apaving= 32041 sf = 0.74 ac Atotal= 41315 sf = 0.95 ac • — a — — 4 a ® P(OH) P(OH) P(OH) P(OH) P(OH)'P(DH) PO ' PC O G __ _. - 1 _ _ _ - - _ 48TH AVENUE SOUTH m -, D ao • l; r111110 te\ . - • 20 20 .11111111.� - -R- - 1, II I 44 041 p Qa , ,. a r covered f ing area - planter II 0 Boundary i Line Adju t J a c 0 - v a 0 Qa:PA o 0 * • o. - 10 o , .,. Ab* o a Planter a��o, e O \\ 0 0 INTERSTATE 5 x' ., 0 40 1 inch = 40 ft. PETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA DRAINAGE BASIN MAP DEVELOPED CONDITIONS by. Pedro DeGuzman, PE Terraforma Design Group, Inc. DATE: 1/28/14 PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND II. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY This Technical Information Report will provide a preliminary review of the 8 core and 5 special requirements of the CTIDCS, including a Level 1 downstream analysis. Core Requirement #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location The existing drainage is collected via two catch basins which discharge to the existing 15 -inch storm drain along the back of sidewalk of 48th Avenue South. The west catch basin outlets to an existing City manhole. The east catch basin is likely tightlined to the 15 -inch main. The proposed storm system will connect to the existing manhole near the west driveway. The existing east tightline connection will be capped. Core Requirement #2 - Off-site Analysis The site is part of the Duwamish River Basin, upstream of Mile 6. Drainage enters the existing 15" storm drainage within 48th Avenue South. The storm drains continues eastward and upsizes to at least a 24" storm drain until it outfalls to the Duwamish River at approximately 1700 feet northeast of our connection point. We do not know of any drainage problems associated with the existing downstream drainage system. Core Requirement #3 - Flow Control Per Figure 5.9.1 Drainage Basins and Flow Control Standards of the CTIDCS, our flow control standard will be "Level 2 Conservation to Existing". The proposed redevelopment will involve an increase in impervious area which will result in a required flow control facility. At this time, we are proposing an underground Stormtech detention chamber system and control structure. The facility will be designed to match the existing durations for 50% of the 2 -yr through 50 -yr peaks and match existing 2- and 10 -yr peaks. The flow control facility will be sized based on the new, post -boundary line adjustment area of 45,000 sf. See Section 4 of this Report. Core Requirement #4 - Conveyance System The storm drainage system will be designed to accommodate the 25yr/24hr storm event. See Section 5 of this report Core Requirement #5 - Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and Sedimentation Control measures will be provided during construction to prevent silt -laden runoff from discharging off-site. See Section 8 of this report. Core Requirement #6 - Maintenance and Operations Terraforma Design Group, Inc. 6 PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND An Operations and Maintenance Manual for Storm Drainage Facilities will be provided to the property owner use after site construction. See Section 10 of this report. Core Requirement #7 - Financial Guarantees and Liability See Section 9 of this report. Core Requirement #8 - Water Quality Water quality treatment will be required for the project. Since this is a commercial project, the Enhance Water Quality Menu should be used for selecting a method for treatment. We request approval to reduce our criteria to the Basic WQ Menu by implementing the following requirements: a) No leachable metals (e.g., galvanized metals) are currently used or proposed to be used in areas of the site exposed to the weather, AND b) A covenant is recorded that prohibits future such use of leachable metals on the site (use the covenant in Reference Section 8-Q), AND c) Less than 50% of the runoff draining to the proposed treatment facility is from any area of the site comprised of one or both of the following land uses: • Commercial land use with an expected ADT of 100 or more vehicles per 1,000 square feet of gross building area. • Commercial land use involved with vehicle repair, maintenance, or sales. The anticipated customer volume is expected to be around 125 trucks per day. If we consider the fueling canopy as the building area (3300 sf), then we will not classify as a High Use Site so long as we don't exceed 330 trucks per day. Water quality will be provided via Contech Stormfilter catch basins as allowed by the manual. Special Requirement #1 - Other Adopted Area Specific Requirements We do not know of any area specific requirements for our immediate vicinity. Special Requirement #2 - Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Not applicable. Site is not within a floodplain or floodway. Terraforma Design Group, Inc. 7 PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND Special Requirement #3 - Flood Protection Facilities Not applicable. Site is not within a floodplain or floodway. Special Requirement #4 - Source Control See Section 10 of this report. Special Requirement #5 - Oil Control Not applicable. Development will not be classified as a "high use" site. See Core Requirement #8 for additional information. III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS The site is part of the Duwamish River Basin, upstream of Mile 6. Drainage enters the existing 15" storm drainage within 48th Avenue South. The storm drains continues eastward and upsizes to at least a 24" storm drain until it outfalls to the Duwamish River at approximately 1700 feet northeast of our connection point. We do not know of any drainage problems associated with the existing downstream drainage system. IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY DESIGN Per Figure 5.9.1 Drainage Basins and Flow Control Standards of the CTIDCS, our flow control standard will be "Level 2 Conservation to Existing". The proposed redevelopment will involve an increase in impervious area which will result in a required flow control facility. At this time, we are proposing an underground Stormtech detention chamber system and control structure. The facility will be designed to match the existing durations for 50% of the 2 -yr through 50 -yr peaks and match existing 2- and 10 -yr peaks. The flow control facility will be sized based on the new, post -boundary line adjustment area of 45,000 sf. Basic water quality treatment will be provided for all pollution generating surfaces which flow to the proposed conveyance and detention system. Contech Catch Basin Stormfilters are proposed and will be sized for 60% of the 2 -year peak flow. See attached calculations. Terraforma Design Group, Inc. 8 KCRTS - FLOW CONTROL CALCULATIONS PREDEVELOPED/EXISTING CONDITIONS Use predeveloped land cover / Use existing conditions Aex,grass= Aex,impervious= DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Adev,pervious= Adev,roof= Adev,paving= 10159 sf = 31156 sf = 41315 sf = 5974 sf = 3300 sf = 32041 sf = 41315 sf = KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series 0.23 ac 0.72 ac 0.95 ac 0.14 ac 0.08 ac 0.74 ac 0.95 ac Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea -Tac Computing Series : EX.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_ Till Grass 0.23 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_ Impervious 0.72 acres DATA\STTG6OR.rnf : DATA\STEI60R.rnf : Total Area : 0.95 acres Peak Discharge: 0.389 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:EX.tsf : CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea -Tac Computing Series : DEV.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG6OR.rnf : Till Grass 0.14 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf : Impervious 0.81 acres Total Area : 0.95 acres Peak Discharge: 0.412 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:DEV.tsf : 9 CRITERIA Provide Flow Control - Level 2 Conservation --> Existing Conditions STEP 1- CREATE TIME SERIES Rainfall Region (Seatac / Landsburg)= Seatac Existing Soil Class (Till/Outwash)= Till Scale Factor= 1.0 Time Step= Hourly --> Enter Analysis Tools Module --> Select Compute Peaks and Flow Frequencies --> Time Series File = predev/ex; Output File= EX/PREDEV.pks --> Extract Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series Filc:cx.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.195 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.389 1 100.00 0.990 0.164 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.268 2 25.00 0.960 0.234 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.234 3 10.00 0.900 0.184 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.220 4 5.00 0.800 0.220 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.208 5 3.00 0.667 0.208 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.195 6 2.00 0.500 0.268 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.184 7 1.30 0.231 0.389 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.164 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.349 50.00 0.980 4 I lir STEP 2 - CREATE TARGET DURATION CURVE Create a duration file (*DUR) for flows between 50% of 2yr and the 50 -yr flow using the PREDEV/EX time series. This will become the "TARGET" duration curve. --> Enter Analysis Tools Module --> Select Compute Flow Durations and Exceedance Flow Duration Data from Time series I Mar -Type of Analysis --,� 1- Partial Year G Full Year Time Series File EX.tst »' Output File TARGET ») Continue TEXT file for Flow Duration Data [.DURI --> Select Continue 10 STEP 3 - SPECIFY INTERVAL INFORMATION 461, Analyse Flow Duration Data o Time Series File is ex.tsf A Output File is TARGET.dur Type Intervals of C Stage r: Discharge Number of Intervals 36 Interval Size .007 First Interval .10 User Specified Intervals Compute Flow Durations **"'-7ftz means the MINIMUM will be used Interval Size= (Q50-50%*Q2)/(36-1) _ First Interval= Q2/2 = --> Compute Flow Durations --> Select Plot Probability Exceedance Curve --> For Flow Duration File -- Select 'TARGET' --> Select Plot Flow Duration Data 0.007 0.10 STEP 4 - SIZE A RETENTION / DETENTION FACILITY --> Goto Main Menu and Select Size Retention / Detention Facility - -> Select 'Automatic' - -> R/D Facility = VAULT --> Select Create a new R/D Facility STEP 5 - SELECT FACILITY TYPE --> Select 'Vault' (we will ultimate use Stormtech Chambers) Design Storage Depth= 2 ft Top of Riser= Flat 11 STEP 6 - SPECIFY FACILITY PARAMETERS 4> Edit R/D Facility:VAULT Bottom Length (Ft) 10.000 J Bottom Width (Ft) 40.000 Bottom Area (Sq Ft) ******'" Effective Storage Depth before Overflow (Ft) 2.000 Elevation at 0 Stage (Ft) 0.000 Riser Head (FtJ 2.000 Riser Diameter (In) 12.000 Number of Orifices 2 Top Riser — – . of - -- – — ;r Notched ( Flat POINT of Compliance Setup Edit Test IIVDROGRAPH Parameters J Define RISER Orifices and Notch SAVE to VAULT.rdf Set the orifice 8 notch information STEP 7 - DEFINE THE POINT OF COMPLIANCE --> Select Point of Compliance Facility Inflow = DEV Facility Outflow = rdout POC Location ='at Facility' STEP 8 - SETUP PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPHS AND TEST INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS --> Select Edit Test Hydrograph Parameters --> Verify Inflow Time Series = DEV.tsf --> Select Edit target peak discharges STEP 9 - SET PRIMARY HYDROGRAPH ** USE ALTERNATE METHOD** Primary Design Hydrograph = 2 Hydrograph:2 Target Discharge = Q25pre = 0.268 cfs STEP 10 - ORIFIC CONFIGURATION Orifice 2 Height = 0.75 * Design Depth = Orifice 1 Qmax = (1.33 * 50% * Q2pre) = --> Select Entries Complete STEP 11- ITERATE FACILITY --> Select Iterate then save to VAULT.rdf STEP 12 - OMITTED STEP 13 - SAVE FACILITY --> Select Save Facility 1.5 ft 0.13 cfs 12 STEP 14 - FINE TUNE FACILITY IN 'MANUAL' MODE --> Select Return to Main Menu --> Select Size a Retention / Detention Facility --> Select 'Manual' Mode --> Select Revise R/D Facility STEP 15 - ROUTE INFLOW TIME SERIES THRU FACILITY --> Select Modify Auto -Analysis Setup --> Check 'Calculate Durations' --> Select Edit Peak/Duration/Volume Info --> Select Plot Durations --> Check Files to Plot = TARGET --> Select Return to Facility Design Menu le Information for Auto -Armes t r Durations Plot Type: Files to Plot: f Files to Plot: Continue Editing r View Duration ,-Plot Information rJ Plot Durations? r Stage rdout.DUR Data f Discharge TARGET >>111 » »Ii Auto -Execute Info J Return to Facility Design Menu 1 ( Piot the Durations after calculating them --> Select Overwrite File --> Select Route Time Series Perform Auto -Analysis STEP 16 - INSPECT DURATION PLOTS B Paused -!>Q�men Analysis -COOS Lia W 0 et• .m ift CO n 0 e n d• c n d m o N O OD. O O OO O O Owe 10 rebut dur o TARGET.dur • • .„, Od .. • • 4� ---p -610 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 11 -0 1 I I I I( 1( 10 a 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Probability Exceedence 1 1 10 .Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 -I 1 1 1 I I I 1 10° 13 .�.." Paused - Duration Analysis - KCRTS Discharge (CFS) ti or w 0 O �.�.. 4. Second arc stops short of overflow. rdout. dur 0 TARGET.dur Second arc corresponds to discharge from both orifices. 10% vertical tolerance except at lower end of target. 1 3. Second arc too high. Transition point controlled by height of second orifice 2. Transition point too far left. 00 O 1. First arc crosses slightly high. First arc corresponds to dis- — charge from lower orifice. 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 1 11111 i 1 1111111 1 1Th 111111 10 5 10 4 10 s 10 2 10 1 100 Probability Exceedence Observation 1. First arc crosses too high, 2. Transition point too far left, 3. Second arc too high, 4. Second arc stops short of overflow, STEP 17 - FINE TUNE FACILITY --> Return to Main Menu --> Select Size a R/D Facility --> Select 'Manual' --> Select Revise R/D Facility --> Select Edit Facility --> Adjust Facility Size and Orifice / Riser Design Refinement 1. reduce bottom orifice diameter. 2. lower second orifice. 3. reduce second orifice diameter. 4. reduce volume if after above refinements the second arc still stops short of overflow. ** Facility upsized to 10'wide x 40'Iong --> Select Overwrite File --> Select Route Time Series Perform Auto -Analysis 14 Paused on Arrdyd>- KCRTS 1 o 14i Milli U cn a a CO N O o N O m O N O co O O O O O 1©� rdoui.dur TARGET.dur o • R • OO 1 I I i 1 1 1 11 1O j 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 10 -3' I 1 1 1I Probability Exceedence 111I 10 .p 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 -t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 100 STEP 18 - COMPARE FLOW DURATIONS --> Select Enter the Analysis Tools Module --> Select Compare Flow Durations Base Time Series = EX New Time Series = rdout Output File Name = COMPARE.PRN Bottom Cutoff= 50% * Q2pre= 0.10 cfs Top Cutoff = Q25pre = 0.268 cfs Number of Cutoffs = 14 --> Select Compare Durations 15 Help / Files - KCRTS Computing Computing Computing Facility Routing Duration Calculation. Interval Locations Flow Durations Durations: Base File: New File: Cutoff Units: Cutoff 0.100 0.113 0.126 0.139 0.151 0.164 0.177 0.190 0.203 0.216 0.229 0.242 0.255 Complete R/D Facility Duration Comparison Anaylsis ex.tsf rdout.tsf Discharge in CFS Fraction of Time Base New /.Change 0.28E-02 0.25E-02 -12.6 0.20E-02 0.12E-02 -37.7 0.14E-02 0.90E-03 -37.5 0.86E-03 0.73E-03 -15.1 0.57E-03 0.51E-03 -11.4 0.46E-03 0.38E-03 -17.9 0.33E-03 0.31E-03 -5.0 0.24E-03 0.24E-03 0.0 0.11E-03 0.15E-03 28.6 0.82E-04 0.82E-04 0.0 0.65E-04 0.16E-04 -75.0 0.16E-04 0.00E+00 -100.0 0.16E-04 0.00E+00 -100.0 Check of Tolerance Probability Base New 0.28E-02 0.100 0.095 0.20E-02 0.113 0.105 0.14E-02 0.126 0.110 0.86E-03 0.139 0.129 0.57E-03 0.151 0.147 0.46E-03 0.164 0.157 0.33E-03 0.177 0.176 0.24E-03 0.190 0.191 0.11E-03 0.203 0.209 0.82E-04 0.216 0.220 0.65E-04 0.229 0.227 0.16E-04 0.242 0.237 0.16E-04 0.255 0.237 Maximum positive excursion 0.012 cfs ( 5.8:) occurring at 0.208 cfs on the Base Data:ex.tsf and at 0.220 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion = 0.018 cfs (-13.8%) occurring at 0.132 cfs on the Base Data:ex.tsf and at 0.113 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf %Change - 4.6 - 6.9 -12.4 - 7.0 - 2.9 - 4.7 - 0.5 0.4 2.8 1.9 -0.9 - 2.2 -7.1 STEP 19 - VERIFY DURATION COMPLIANCE • First cutoff must have a percent change (las equal to or less than 0.0. • The remaining cutoffs must have a value positive 10.0 percent. • At least one-half of the cutoffs must have negative percent change. • Note the absolute maximum positive and vertical excursions found at the bottom of the t t column) less than a zero or negative able. less than • The maximum positive excursion must be positive 10.0 percent. ** DURATION REQUIREMENT IS MET - FACILITY PASSES 16 STEP 20 - DESIGN FACILITY & PROPOSED FACILITY SUMMARY FACILITY DESIGN LENGTH = FACILITY DESIGN WIDTH = DESIGN DEPTH = DESIGN STORAGE VOL = ORIFICE 1 DIA. = ORIFICE 2 DIA. = ORIFICE 2 HEIGHT= 40 ft 10 ft 2 ft 800 cf 1.74 in 2.54 in 1.88 ft ** PROPOSE STORMTECH SC -740 CHAMBERS VOL per chamber = 46.83 cf (from Stage Elev 1.0 ft to 3.0 ft w/ rock) Dimension per Chamber = 7.11' long x 4.75' wide (w/ rock) REQD NUMBER OF CHAMBERS= 17.1 ** PROPOSE 18 — SC -740 CHAMBERS 17 Project Name: Project Number: DRAINAGE CRITERIA: RAINFALL METHOD: STORMFILTER TREATMENT VAULT PETERSON TRUCK FUEL STATION By: P.A.D. 13035 Date: 1/28/14 TUKWILA KCRTS PAVING (WEST) Step 1) Calculate design flows Apaving= Alandscape= KCRTS results Q2year: Water quality flow (Qwq)= 0.24 ac 0.10 ac 0.11 cfs 0.07 cfs 60% of Q2yr (15 -min. time series file) Step 2) Calculate Number of Cartridges Cartridge Height (in) = 18 Treatment Rate (gpm / cart). N = Number of Cartridges = Qwq * 449 gpm / cfs / (treatment rate) 7.5 4.09 =_=> USE 5 CARTRIDGES use 1 — 3 -CARTRIDGE CONTECH CATCH BASIN STORMFILTER and 1 — 2 -CARTRIDGE CB STORMFILTER 18 13035 -ST M C LC.x Is, STM F LTR -WEST Project Name: Project Number: DRAINAGE CRITERIA: RAINFALL METHOD: STORMFILTER TREATMENT VAULT PETERSON TRUCK FUEL STATION By: P.A.D. 13035 Date: 1/28/14 TUKWILA KCRTS PAVING (EAST) Step 1) Calculate design flows Apaving= Alandscape= KCRTS results Q2year: Water quality flow (Qwq)= 0.49 ac 0.02 ac 0.23 cfs 0.14 cfs 60% of Q2yr (15 -min. time series file) Step 2) Calculate Number of Cartridges Cartridge Height (in) = 18 Treatment Rate (gpm / cart)= N = Number of Cartridges = Qwq * 449 gpm / cfs / (treatment rate) 7.5 = 8.30 ===> USE 9 CARTRIDGES use 2 — 4 -CARTRIDGE CONTECH CATCH BASIN STORMFILTERS and 1 — 1 -CARTRIDGE CB STORMFILTER 19 13035-STMCLC.xls, STM FLTR-EAST PROJECT: PETERSON TRUCK FUELING ISLAND V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The storm drainage system will be designed to accommodate the 25yr/24hr storm event. Conveyance calculations will be provided with the Building Permit submittal. VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES VII. OTHER PERMITS Not Applicable. To be provided with the Building Permit application. VIII. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN Erosion Control BMP's will consist of a rock construction entrance, silt fencing, sediment pond, temporary swales and soil stabilization measures. Additional erosion control measures will be required as necessary to ensure that sediment -laden runoff is not discharged to adjacent properties. IX. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT To be provided with the Building Permit Application. X. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL .._ To be provided with the Building Permit application. Terraforma Design Group, Inc. 20 K 1 Stantec PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE & FUEL STATION TUKWILA, WA Geotechnical Investigation Prepared for: Mr. Steven Peterson XMR, Inc. 30540 SE 8e Street, Suite 4 Preston, Washington 98050 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services 11130 NE 33rd Place, Suite 200 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Tel: (425) 869-9448 Fax: (425) 869-1190 Project No.: 185750173 December 5, 2013 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 1: Introduction Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Project Description 1 3 Site Description 1 4 Geotechnical Subsurface Investigation 2 4.1 Site Investigation Program 2 5 Soil and Groundwater Conditions 2 5.1 Area Geology 2 5.2 Soil Conditions 3 6 Geological Hazards 4 6.1 Erosion Hazard 4 6.2 Seismic Hazard 4 7 Discussion 6 7.1 General 6 8 Recommendations 7 8.1 Site Preparation 7 8.2 Temporary Excavations 7 8.3 Erosion and Sediment Control 8 8.4 Foundation Design 8 8.5 Slab -on -Grade 14 8.6 Utilities 14 8.7 Groundwater Influence on Construction 15 8.8 Pavement Design 15 9 Construction Field Reviews 17 10 Closure 17 List of Appendices Appendix A Statement of General Conditions Appendix B Site Maps Appendix C Borehole Log Records December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 1 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 1: Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION In accordance with your authorization, Stantec has completed a geotechnical investigation for the proposed convenience store and fuel station located at 13310 Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington (Figure 1). The purpose of the geotechnical investigation was to identify subsurface conditions and to provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed structure and fuel island canopies. The scope of work for the geotechnical investigation consisted of a site investigation followed by engineering analyses to prepare this report. Recommendations presented herein pertain to various geotechnical aspects of the proposed development, including foundation design and pavement recommendations. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The currently proposed development includes a single storey commercial building and associated asphalt paved parking areas and landscaped regions. Two fuel islands with canopies will be constructed north and south of the new building. We anticipate that the structure will be of masonry construction and supported on continuous perimeter footings and that the proposed canopies will be supported by pole -type foundations. We anticipate that foundation loads will be generally light and that site grading will include cuts and fills on the order of 3 feet or less for general site development and excavations up to 14 feet below grade for removal of existing underground storage tanks (USTs) and placement of -new USTs near the two fuel islands. 3 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located at 13310 Interurban Avenue South and includes the connecting property located at 13100 48th Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on Figure 1 (Vicinity Map). The site extends generally northeast to southwest along the southeast side of 48th Avenue South. For the purposes of this report, northeast will be referred to as project north. The site consists of two irregularly shaped parcels (0003000113 and 0003000045) with a combined area of 72,500 square feet. The south parcel is currently developed as a fuel station with convenience store. The north parcel is currently developed with a commercial building (former restaurant). Both properties have asphalt pavement access drives and parking lots. Small landscaped regions within the site are vegetated with grasses, blackberry vines, and sparse deciduous and evergreen trees. The site is generally level; however, an easement between the two parcels slopes gently to the north at magnitudes of less than 30 percent with a topographic relief of approximately 4 feet. The east margins of both properties slope gently to the east and into a ditch/swale located between the site and an off ramp from 1-5. December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 4: Geotechnical Subsurface Investigation The site is bordered to the north by a hotel, to the west by 48th Avenue South and commercial developments, to the south by Interurban Avenue South, and to the east by 1-5. 4 GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 4.1 Site Investigation Program The geotechnical field investigation program was completed on November 19, 2013 and included drilling and sampling two hollow stem auger borings drilled by Davies Drilling, a Stantec subcontractor, using a track mounted drill rig. The borings were located strategically to provide a soil profile of the entire site. Two additional hand borings were advanced to confirm the soil conditions of the other two borings and a previous boring by Converse Consultants. The soils encountered were logged in the field during the exploration and are described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Disturbed soil samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) as described in ASTM D-1586. The Standard Penetration Test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2 -inch outside - diameter, split barrel sampler into the subsoil with a 140 -pound hammer free falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The summation of hammer -blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 - inches of an 18 -inch sample interval is defined as the Standard Penetration Resistance, or N -value. The blow count is presented graphically on the boring Togs in this appendix. The resistance, or "N" value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or of the relative consistency of cohesive soils. --A Stantec field representative directed the drilling program, collected -disturbed -soil samples-from— split spoon sampler tubes, classified the encountered soils, kept a detailed log of each auger hole, and observed and recorded pertinent site features. The results of the drilling and sampling are presented on the boring logs enclosed in Appendix C. The results of select laboratory testing can also be found in this appendix. 5 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS 5.1 Area Geology The site lies within the Puget Lowland. The lowland is part of a regional north -south trending trough that extends from southwestern British Columbia to near Eugene, Oregon. North of Olympia, Washington, this lowland is glacially carved, with a depositional and erosional history including at least four separate glacial advances/retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded to the west by the Olympic Mountains and to the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland is filled with glacial and nonglacial sediments consisting of interbedded gravel, sand, silt, till, and peat lenses. Stantec December 5, 2013 Project No. 185750173 2 ukwila,4WA�� Geotechnical Investigation Section 5: Soil and Groundwater Conditions The Geologic Map of the Des Moines Quadrangle, indicates that the site is underlain by Alluvium. Alluvium in the Puget Lowland generally consists of varying mixtures of silt, sand, clay, gravel, and organic debris deposited in fluvial environments within the last several thousand years. Alluvium deposited by the Duwamish River is variable in composition and density, and typically consists of soft to stiff silt with areas of peat overlying loose to dense fine grained volcanic derived sand. In this area, the alluvium is underlain at variable depths by bedrock. Bedrock in this area includes sandstone, siltstone, and shale with local seams of coal. 5.2 Soil Conditions Details of the encountered soil conditions are presented on the boring logs in Appendix C. The detailed soil description on these Togs should be referred to in preference to the generalized description provided below. Boring B-1 The soils encountered in Boring B-1 included approximately 6 inches of grass and topsoil underlain by approximately 5 feet of very soft to soft silt with variable amounts of sand (Alluvium). This layer was underlain by approximately 10 feet of very soft to soft silt with areas/interbeds of peat (Alluvium). This layer was underlain by medium dense to dense, fine to medium grained sand with variable amounts of silt (Alluvium), which continued to the termination depth of the boring. Boring B-2 The soils encountered in Boring B-2 included approximately 6 inches of grass and topsoil underlain by approximately 2.5 feet of loose, silty -fine to medium grained sand with variable amounts of gravel (Fill). This layer was underlain by approximately 7.5 feet of very soft to soft silt with areas/interbeds -of peat (Alluvium). This layer was underlain by approximately 5 -feet of soft silt with -variable -amounts- - of sand (Alluvium). This layer was underlain by medium dense (to dense), fine to medium grained sand with variable amounts of silt (Alluvium), which continued to the termination depth of the boring. Hand Borings HB -1 and HB -2 The soils encountered in Hand Borings HB -1 and HB -2 included approximately 6 inches of grass and topsoil underlain by approximately 4.5 to 5.5 feet of very soft to soft silt with variable amounts of sand (Alluvium). This layer was underlain by approximately 9 feet of very soft to soft silt with areas/interbeds of peat (Alluvium). This layer was underlain by medium dense to dense, fine to medium grained sand with variable amounts of silt (Alluvium), which continued to the termination depth of the hand borings. Previous Explorations A geotechnical investigation was conducted by Converse Consultants in 1991 to 1992 for a sewer tunneling project located along the north side of Interurban Avenue South. One of their borings, B- 101, was located in the right of way just south of the site and extended to a depth of 38 feet below existing grade. Several other borings were located east and west of B-101 and were drilled to similar depths. Boring B-101 encountered approximately 17 feet of silt, silt with peat, and silty -sand underlain by fine grained sand. Bedrock was encountered at approximately 35 feet below grade. The materials encountered in this boring were very similar to those encountered in our borings (soil types and relative density or consistency). December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 3 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 6: Geological Hazards Groundwater At the time of our investigation, groundwater was observed in Boring B-1 at 16 feet below grade, in B-2 at 13 feet below grade, HB -1 at 14 feet below grade and HB -2 at 15 feet below grade. Very moist mottled soils and possible perched groundwater were encountered within the upper 15 feet of the ground surface. The groundwater beneath the site does not readily correlate to a consistent interbed or common soil material contact within the alluvial deposits. We anticipate that a seasonal perched zone develops within the upper silt and peat materials during the general period between October and June. The lower groundwater level is generally consistent with the elevation of the nearby Duwamish River and is located within the poorly graded sand materials below the silt. Water table elevations often fluctuate over time. The groundwater level will depend on a variety of factors that may include seasonal precipitation, irrigation, land use, climatic conditions and soil permeability. Water levels at the time of the field investigation may be different from those encountered during the construction phase of the project. Groundwater monitoring wells were not installed as part of this investigation, therefore determining long term groundwater fluctuations is beyond the scope of this report. 6 GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS 6.1 Erosion Hazard The Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) maps for King County do not include -information-within the City of Seattle -and adjacent areas, of which this -site -is included:- From our experience with similar silt loam soils, we anticipate that the near surface site soils would have a "Slight" erosion potential in a disturbed state. It is our opinion that soil erosion potential at this project site can be reduced through landscaping and surface water runoff control. Typically erosion of exposed soils will be most noticeable during periods of rainfall and may be controlled by the use of normal temporary erosion control measures, such as silt fences, hay bales, mulching, control ditches and diversion trenches. The typical wet weather season, with regard to site grading, is from October 31St to April 1st. Erosion control measures should be in place before the onset of wet weather. 6.2 Seismic Hazard We encountered loose/soft to dense/stiff soils at the project site. Below the upper zone of soft silt, the soils were generally medium dense to dense. Based on previous borings and the relative density of the underlying bedrock, the overall subsurface profile corresponds to a Site Class D as defined by Table 1613.5.2 of the 2009 International Building Code (2009 IBC). A Site Class D applies to an overall profile consisting of medium dense/stiff to very dense/hard materials within the upper 100 feet. December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 4 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 6: Geological Hazards We referenced the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program Website to obtain values for Ss, S1, Fe, and F. The USGS website includes the most updated published data on seismic conditions. The site specific seismic design parameters and adjusted maximum spectral response acceleration parameters are as follows: PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration, in percent of g) 33.03 (10% Probability of Exceedence in 50 years) 65.27 (2% Probability of Exceedence in 50 years) Ss 146.90% of g S, 50.50% of g FA 1.00 Fv 1.50 Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motions by soft/loose soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high groundwater table. Soil liquefaction is a state where soil particles lose contact with each other and become suspended in a viscous fluid. This suspension of the soil grains results in a complete loss of strength as the effective stress drops to zero as a result of increased pore pressures. Liquefaction normally occurs under saturated conditions in soils such as sand in which the strength is purely frictional. However, liquefaction has occurred in soils other than clean sand, such as low plasticity silt. Liquefaction usually occurs under vibratory conditions such as those induced by seismic events. We utilized the soil composition and blow count data from our borings in order to analyze the liquefaction potential under varying levels of seismic activity. To evaluate the liquefaction potential of the site, we analyzed the following factors: 1) Soil type and plasticity 2) Groundwater depth 3) Relative soil density 4) Initial confining pressure 5) Maximum anticipated intensity and duration of ground shaking December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 5 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 7: Discussion The commercially available LiglT V.4.7.7.1 software was used to evaluate the liquefaction potential and the possible liquefaction induced settlement for the existing site soil and groundwater conditions. The Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) was selected in accordance with the 2009 International Building Code (2009 IBC) Chapter 16 and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program website. The probabilistic maximum considered earthquake is a one in 2,500 year event which has a 2 percent probability of being exceeded in 50 years. For this area, the one in 2,500 year event has a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.6527g (per U.S. Geological Survey) and a 8.0 magnitude. For the one in 2,500 year event, the analyses reveal that there is moderate potential for liquefaction at the site with the current soil and groundwater conditions; on the order of 2.65 inches, with differential settlements on the order of 1 to 1.5 inches. 7 DISCUSSION 7.1 General The results of the site investigation completed for the proposed development indicate that the site is underlain by approximately 16 feet of very soft to soft silt with areas of peat and some lose sands. These materials have a moderate to high potential for consolidation and settlement following static loading and some potential for liquefaction during/after certain seismic events. Medium dense to dense sand underlies these materials and is generally suitable for structural support. The liquefaction hazard at the site is moderate due to the presence of very soft to soft silt with peat and loose sands. The very soft to soft silt and silt with peat have a moderate to high probability of static settlement over time. Due to these factors, we recommend that a foundation system bearing on driven steel pipe piles or helical anchors be utilized for support of the proposed building. Alternative foundation systems and ground improvement options are presented in this report, and we recommend that feasible foundation options be evaluated based on a cost versus risk basis. The proposed fuel island canopy structure may be supported on drilled shaft foundations extending to at least 20 feet below the existing site grades or on isolated foundation elements supported by driven pipe piles or helical piers. The existing asphalt parking Tots are moderately cracked in most areas. Our explorations encountered fill and/or soft native soils within the upper 2 feet which became softer with depth. We recommend replacement of the upper 2 feet of existing soil materials with imported suitable gravelly structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified proctor (ASTM D1557 Test Method). All of the existing near surface soil materials should be considered highly moisture sensitive and proper compaction will be difficult if not impossible to achieve if the moisture levels are greater than 3 percent of optimum. The use of imported gravelly structural fill should be expected. December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 6 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations 8 RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Site Preparation The existing asphalt within the development area should be removed prior to grading and excavation work. It will be necessary to construct site access roads using a geotextile such as Mirafi 500x and 2 to 3 feet of 2 to 4 inch quarry rock. We recommend that earthwork activities take place during the drier months of the year (typically July through September). The underlying native soils within the site generally consist of silt with variable amounts of sand and are not suitable for use as structural fill due to high fines content, high moisture content, and locally high organic content. Imported structural fill should consist of a sand and gravel mixture with a maximum grain size of 3 inches and less than 5 percent fines (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve). Structural fill should be placed in maximum lift thicknesses of 12 inches and should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the modified proctor maximum dry density, as determined by the ASTM D 1557 test method. 8.2 Temporary Excavations Based on our understanding of the project, we anticipate that the grading will include local cuts on the order of approximately 3 feet for development of the building and parking lot/drive areas, and cuts on the order of 14 feet for removal and placement of USTs. For any temporary cuts that will extend deeper than 4 feet, the temporary excavations should be sloped no steeper than 2H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) in soft to medium stiff native soils and 3H:1 V in soils below the groundwater table. We anticipate that temporary shoring, such as driving sheet piles or slide -rail shoring will be used to minimize excavation areas. - If an excavation is subject to heavy vibration or surcharge loads, we recommend that the excavation be sloped no steeper than 3H:1V and 3.5H:1V respectively as above, where room permits. Shallow groundwater and very fine sand and/or silt soils may lead to a high susceptibility for soils to cave in excavations, therefore Stantec should observe excavations to determine if gentler slope angles or temporary shoring are needed. All temporary cuts should be in accordance with the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Part N, Excavation, Trenching, and Shoring. The temporary slopes should be visually inspected daily by a qualified person during construction activities and the inspections should be documented in daily reports. The contractor is responsible for maintaining the stability of the temporary cut slopes and reducing slope erosion during construction. The temporary cut slopes should be covered with visqueen to help reduce erosion during wet weather, and the slopes should be closely monitored until the permanent retaining systems or slope configurations are complete. Materials should not be stored or equipment operated within 10 feet of the top of any temporary cut slope. Soil conditions may not be completely known from the geotechnical investigation. In the case of temporary cuts, the existing soil conditions may not be completely revealed until the excavation work exposes the soil. Typically, as excavation work progresses the maximum inclination of the temporary slopes will need to be re-evaluated by the geotechnical engineer so that supplemental recommendations can be made. Soil and groundwater conditions can be highly variable. December 5, 2013 Stafliie'C Project No. 185750173 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations Scheduling for soil work will need to be adjustable, to deal with unanticipated conditions, so that the project can proceed and required deadlines can be met. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, Stantec should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. If room constraints or groundwater conditions do not permit temporary slopes to be cut to the maximum angles allowed by the WAC, temporary shoring systems may be required. The contractor should be responsible for developing temporary shoring systems, if needed. We recommend that Stantec and the project structural engineer review temporary shoring designs prior to installation, to verify the suitability of the proposed systems. 8.3 Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to reduce the transportation of eroded sediment to wetlands, streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should be implemented and these measures should be in general accordance with local regulations. At a minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and sediment control features for the site: • Schedule the soil, foundation, utility, and other work requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site soils, to take place during the dry season (generally May through September). However, provided precautions are taken using Best Management Practices (BMP's), grading activities can be completed during the wet season (generally October through April). Given the relatively high fines content and moisture sensitivity of some of the shallow subsurface soils at this site, we _expect that wet season_.grading would_add_significant cost to the project construction. • All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible. • Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems. • Any runoff generated by dewatering discharge should be treated through construction of a sediment trap if there is sufficient space. If space is limited other filtration methods will need to be incorporated. 8.4 Foundation Design Due to the presence of soft/loose soils that may consolidate over time, one of the following foundation options for the proposed structure may be considered: • Driven steel pipe (pin) piles or helical anchors (vertical and battered) ranging from 25 to 30 feet in depth with friction and end bearing capacities suitable for foundation support Stantec December 5, 2013 Project No. 185750173 8 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations • Complete overexcavation of soft silt and silt with peat soils to an approximate depth of 16 feet below grade beneath the entire proposed convenience store footprint followed by replacement with imported structural fill and strip and pad shallow foundation construction • Partial overexcavation of soft silt and silt with peat soils to an approximate depth of 16 feet below grade only beneath the proposed convenience store foundation followed by replacement with CDF or lean mix concrete and shallow strip and pad foundation construction • Augercast reinforced concrete piles ranging in depth from 25 to 30 feet with grade beams supporting the structure • A foundation system bearing on a series of rock columns consisting of open or cased augered holes ranging in depth from approximately 20 to 25 feet; backfilled and compacted with angular rock up to building subgrade elevations. Typically speciality contractors perform this service. Shallow foundation options with ground improvement by replacement may be a viable cost-effective solution. Deep foundation options are generally less cost effective; however, higher allowable bearing pressures can often be used and they are generally reliable. Overall, we anticipate that 3 inch diameter driven galvanized steel pipe (pin) piles or helical anchors with appropriate pile caps will be the most cost effective means of providing foundation support for the proposed structure. Additional foundation options and/or additional recommendations for the above listed options can be provided upon request. Driven Pipe Piles and Helical Anchors To effectively eliminate the effects of differential and total settlement due to consolidation of the underlying soft silt and silt with peat soils, we recommend that 3 inch diameter steel pipe or helical anchors piles be driven/advanced beneath foundation elements for the proposed building. The pile or anchor spacing will be determined by the project structural engineer during their design work. We anticipate a pile or anchor depth on the order of 25 to 30 feet; however, the final depths will be dependent on the loads required and soil conditions during pile driving. Pipe piles should consist of Schedule 80 galvanized steel with mechanical couplers for splices. Battered piles will be necessary to provide lateral support to the structure. A 1/3 increase in the above value may be used for short duration loads, such as those imposed by wind and seismic events. Exterior pile caps should have a minimum depth of 18 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, whichever is lower. Interior pile caps should have a minimum depth of 12 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, whichever is lower. If constructed as recommended, the total static foundation settlement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential settlement, along a 25 -foot exterior wall footing, or between adjoining column footings, should be less than 0.5 inches. Most settlement is expected to occur during construction, as the loads are applied. December 5, 2013 5nteC Project No. 185750173 9 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations Allowable Pile Compression Capacities (Driven Steel Pipe (Pin) Piles) Pipe (Pin) Piles Diameter (inches) Hammer Sizes (pounds) Total Allowable Axial Compression Capacity (Subject to Buckling Capacity by Structural Engineer) (kips) 2 (Schedule 80) 90, 140 or 400 4 3 650 or 850 12 4 1,500 20 The pipe piles should be driven to refusal and to completely penetrate the loose/soft soils and adequately embedded (minimum 10 feet) in suitable bearing materials (dense sands). Refusal criteria will be provided based on the driving equipment during construction. We recommend that the piles be designed to have additional sacrificial steel to account for corrosion during design life or will be provided with adequate corrosion protection such as galvanization. A structural engineer shall perform the structural design of the pile including spacing and reinforcing steel. The structural engineer also should determine the buckling load for the slender piles and make sure that is not exceeded. It is recommended that the structural engineer design a structural slab that is suspended across piles in order to minimize slab settlement problems. Helical Piers® Helical Pier® foundation system may be employed for existing or new foundations. The Helical Piers® could be installed using portable rotary tools, truck mounted rotary tools, backhoe mounted rotary tools, caisson drills, or skid -steer loaders. It is important that the torque output, rotational speed, down pressure capability, and angle control of the installation equipment is compatible with the required foundation system. The pile installation equipment should have adequate torque capacity to prevent refusal conditions at relatively shallower depths that are well above recommended bearing depths or layers. A Helical Pier® consists of an anchor (lead section) with 1, 2, 3 or more helical flights on a shaft. The number and diameter of the helices on the anchor are dependent on the soil characteristics of the site and the design loads to be applied to the pier. Based on these parameters the anchor helix configuration is chosen to best fit the site conditions. As the anchor is advanced into the soil extension sections (shaft) are placed on the lead section. The shaft configuration is based on the design Toads and anticipated installation torque. Stantec December 5, 2013 Project No. 185750173 10 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations Based on Boring B-1 data, the upper 25 feet of soils are liquefiable and therefore cannot be relied for any support. The static compression load capacity of a Helical Pier® is the sum of all individual helix capacities below liquefiable soils and in bearing layer. Individual helix static compression capacity is the result of the projected area of the helix, and its bearing pressure. It is recommended that the piers penetrate into the dense native soils a minimum of 10 feet, or until refusal whichever is shallower. We anticipate the bearing layer to be at variable depths below the existing ground surface. However, based on the Boring B-1 data, the bearing layer is present at approximately 25 feet depth below ground surface. However, this depth is subject to verification in the field during construction. Increased capacity can be obtained with increased penetration, and additional helical flights on the lead section. Since variations in the depth of the bearing layer are anticipated, we recommend that the Helical Piers® have a minimum overall length capability of 35 feet. It should be recognized that the importance of seating the piers on bearing soils since critical conditions occur during seismic events that result in reduction or loss of soil strength and support in the upper loose to medium dense soils due to liquefaction. Helical Pier® installation should be monitored to verify installation torque, and proper embedment into the presumed bearing layer. The Helical Pier® lengths may need to be modified during construction if it is determined that the depth to the bearing layer varies. Helical Pier® anchors are well suited to field adjustments as length can be varied by merely adding or deleting extension sections (shafts) during installation. Monitoring installation torque in the field is used to estimate the anchor compression capacity, and also as a quality control during anchor installation, provided that the anchor is bearing in dense or hard soils. Dependent on the pile size and the equipment used to install the anchors, an empirical factor is multiplied by the average -torque -over the final 3 feet of installation to estimate -ultimate -- capacity. Allowable Helical Pier Compression Capacity Pa may be estimated from the following equation provided that the pier is in the recommended bearing soils: Pa = Kt X T/FoS, Where T is the applied torque, Kt is the empirical ratio factor. The following industry standards apply to shafts with blades spaced along the shaft at 2.5 to 3.5 times the average blade diameter on -center and meeting the manufacturer's specifications. 1.5" and 1.75" Square Shafts - Kt = 9 ff' 2.875" O.D. Round Shafts - Kt = 9 ft-' 3.0" O.D. Round Shafts Kt= 8 ff1 3.5" O.D. Round Shafts - Kt = 7 fft Stantec December 5, 2013 Project No. 185750173 11 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations FoS is Factor of Safety (minimum 3), using any set of consistent units. It should be recognized that higher torque than the above equation estimates may be needed to penetrate gravels and cobbles and to achieve the bearing soils or depths. It is recommended that the equipment is capable of applying minimum torques on the order of 10,000 ft -lbs. Helical piers shall also be installed per manufacturer's recommendations. The allowable axial compression capacity of helical pier may be assumed as 20 kips for design purposes and it is subject to field verification by testing. We recommend that the piles be designed to have additional sacrificial steel to account for corrosion during design life or be provided with adequate corrosion protection. If lateral capacity is needed, battered pin piles may be employed. A representative of Stantec should be present at the site during the Helical Pier Installation to verify general conformance with our recommendations. A structural engineer shall perform the structural design of the pile including reinforcing steel and concrete strength required. It is recommended that the structural engineer design a structural slab that is suspended across piles in order to minimize slab settlement problems. Overexcavation and Fill Replacement for Conventional Spread Footings To effectively eliminate the effects of differential and total settlement due to consolidaion of the underlying soft silt and silt with peat soils, we recommend that all foundation elements be overexcavated to the level of the medium dense to dense sand, approximately 16 feet below grade, and extending at least 10 feet laterally from the edges of all footings. In effect, the overexcavation and replacement work should include the entire interior of the -proposed -structure and extend -beyond the building in all directions by 10 feet. This should be performed under the supervision of Stantec geotechnical staff to ensure removal of all compressible soils and to verify the lateral extents of the overexcavations. Following the overexcavation work, we recommend placement of a filter fabric (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) and structural fill up to footing subgrade elevations per the recommendations in Section 8.1 of this report. Alternatively, the excavation work could be limited to the areas below the footings only; however, trench boxes would be necessary to keep the excavations open. For this option, backfill of the excavations should consist of a 1.5 to 2 sack lean mixed concrete, also known as controlled density fill (CDF) up to foundation subgrade elevations. These excavations should extend below all building footings and extend laterally at least 2 feet beyond the footing edges. The overexcavation depth required is the same as above, approximately 16 feet below grade. For shallow foundation support, we recommend minimum widths of 18 and 24 inches, respectively, for continuous wall and isolated column footings supporting the proposed building. All footings should have a maximum width of 3.5 feet. Provided that the footings are supported as recommended above, a net allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for design. December 5, 2013 Stant& Project No. 185750173 12 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations A 1/3 increase in the above value may be used for short duration loads, such as those imposed by wind and seismic events. Footing excavations should be inspected by Stantec to verify that the foundations will bear on suitable material. Exterior footings should have a minimum depth of 18 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, whichever is lower. Interior footings should have a minimum depth of 12 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade) or adjacent exterior grade, whichever is lower. If constructed as recommended, the total static foundation settlement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential settlement, along a 25 -foot exterior wall footing, or between adjoining column footings, should be less than 0.5 inches. Most settlement is expected to occur during construction, as the Toads are applied. Resistance to lateral footing displacement can be determined using an allowable friction factor of 0.35 acting between the bases of foundations and the supporting subgrade. Lateral resistance for footings can also be developed using an allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting against the appropriate vertical footing faces (neglect the upper 12 inches below grade in exterior areas). The allowable friction factor and allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure values include a factor of safety of 1.5. The frictional and passive resistance of the soil may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. A 1/3 increase in the above values may be used for short duration transient loads. Canopy Foundations The proposed Canopy structures may be supported on reinforced concrete drilled shafts extending into the medium dense native sandy soils. We recommend that the foundation elements extend at least -20 -feet below existing grades. However, the foundation should be -designed to -resist all vertical and lateral forces as well as associated moments. Temporary casing will be needed to prevent caving of augured holes. If the pole foundations need to be backfilled, suitable structural fill material should be used and it should be placed in 12 -inch thick layers and compacted to at least 95% of modified proctor density as determined according to ASTM D1557 Test Method. If the lateral space is limited, we recommend placement of % inch clean angular rock or lean mixed concrete (1.5 sack minimum) around the foundation elements. A net allowable compression end bearing pressure of 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf) and an allowable lateral bearing pressure of 500 psf and 1,500 psf , ignoring the upper 10 feet, for a depth from 10 to 15 feet and below 15 feet, respectively, may be used for design of the pole foundations. The allowable skin friction of 250 psf and 500 psf for a depth from 10 feet to 15 feet and below 15 feet, respectively, could also be used, if needed. We estimate that the in-situ unit weight of existing soils within the uppermost 15 feet to be 125 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), with a soil friction angle of 26 degrees and no cohesion. Alternatively, the canopy structures may be supported on shallow foundation elements supported by driven steel pipe piles or helical anchors (as described in the Foundation section). These systems would need to include battered piles to adequately provide lateral capacity against seismic and wind loads and moments. Stantec December 5, 2013 Project No. 185750173 13 n Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations A 1/3 increase in the above value may be used for short duration Toads, such as those imposed by wind and seismic events. Footing excavations should be inspected to verify that the foundations will bear on suitable material. 8.5 Slab -on -Grade If the entire slab area for the proposed building is not replaced with structural fill to a depth of approximately 16 feet during foundation placement, we recommend that the upper 3 feet of the existing subgrade be removed underlying the building floor slab sections in areas where the existing soils are above proposed grades. The over -excavated areas should be compacted and backfilled to the planned floor slab subgrade level with structural fill. Some settlement of the floor slabs with time is likely. I order to avoid it, a structural slab may be considered instead where the structural slab will transfer the loads to the foundation elements. Often, a vapor barrier is considered below concrete slab areas. However, the usage of a vapor barrier could result in curling of the concrete slab at joints. Floor covers sensitive to moisture typically requires the usage of a vapor barrier. A materials or structural engineer should be consulted regarding the detailing of the vapor barrier below concrete slabs. The American Concrete Institutes ACI 360R-06 Design of Slabs on Grade and ACI 302.1R-04 Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction are recommended references for vapor barrier selection and floor slab detailing. Slabs on grade may be designed using a coefficient of subgrade reaction of 190 pounds per cubic inch (pci) assuming the slab -on -grade base course is underlain by structural fill placed and compacted as outlined in Section 8.1. A perimeter drainage system is recommended unless interior slab areas are elevated a minimum of 12 inches_above adjacent exterior grades_ If installed, a perimeter drainage system should consist of a 4 inch diameter perforated drain pipe surrounded by a minimum 6 inches of drain rock wrapped in a non -woven geosynthetic filter fabric to reduce migration of soil particles into the drainage system. The perimeter drainage system should discharge by gravity flow to a suitable stormwater system. Exterior grades surrounding buildings should be sloped at a minimum of one percent to facilitate surface water flow away from these buildings and preferably with a relatively impermeable surface cover immediately adjacent to the buildings. 8.6 Utilities Utility trenches should be excavated according to accepted engineering practices following OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) standards, by a contractor experienced in such work. The contractor is responsible for the safety of open trenches. Traffic and vibration adjacent to trench walls should be reduced; cyclic wetting and drying of excavation side slopes should be avoided. Depending upon the location and depth of some utility trenches, groundwater flow into open excavations could be experienced, especially during or shortly following periods of precipitation. In general, silty and sandy soils were encountered at shallow depths in the explorations at this site. At this site, these soils have very low cohesion and density and will have a tendency to severely cave or slough in excavations. Shoring or sloping back trench sidewalls is required within these soils. Stantec December 5, 2013 Project No. 185750173 14 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations All utility trench backfill should consist of imported structural fill or suitable on site soils (sand and gravel mixtures with less than 5 percent fines). Utility trench backfill placed in or adjacent to buildings and exterior slabs should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. The upper 5 feet of utility trench backfill placed in pavement areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Below 5 feet, utility trench backfill in pavement areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Pipe bedding should be in accordance with the pipe manufacturer's recommendations. The contractor is responsible for removing all water -sensitive soils from the trenches regardless of the backfill location and compaction requirements. Depending on the depth of the proposed utilities, we anticipate the need to overexcavate below utility structures and potentially, utility lines to a depth of 1 to 2 feet below proposed elevations in order to construct suitable bearing strata for support. The overexcavated materials should be replaced with a clean angular rock, 1 to 4 inches in size; bucket compacted into the underlying native soils. The contractor should use appropriate equipment and methods to avoid damage to the utilities and/or structures during fill placement and compaction procedures. 8.7 Groundwater Influence on Construction At the time of our investigation, groundwater was observed,in Boring B-1 at 16 feet below grade, in B-2 at 13 feet below grade, in HB -1 at 14 feet below grade, and in HB -2 at 15 feet below grade. Very moist mottled soils and possible perched groundwater were encountered within the upper 15 feet of the ground surface. The groundwater beneath the site does not readily correlate to a consistent interbed or common soil material contact within the -alluvial deposits --We anticipate that a seasonal perched zone develops within the upper silt and peat materials during the general period between October and June. The lower groundwater level is generally consistent with the elevation of the nearby Duwamish River and is located within the poorly graded sand materials below the silt. Light to moderate perched groundwater should be anticipated to be encountered in excavations deeper than 4 feet. Heavy regional groundwater should be expected in excavations greater than approximately 12 feet below existing site grades. If temporary dewatering systems to remove groundwater are used, their design should be the responsibility of the contractor. We should review any dewatering design prior to their use on site. 8.8 Pavement Design We observed moderate cracking of the existing asphalt within the site area, indicating the presence of soft soils at variable depths below the ground surface. The near surface soils encountered in our borings included very soft to soft silt and loose silty sand. The following section provides recommendations for pavement design and subgrade preparation if the existing asphalt is going to be replaced as part of the development. December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 115 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 8: Recommendations The near surface subgrade soils generally consist of soft silt, sandy silt and loose silty -sand. These soils are rated as poor for pavement subgrade material. We estimate that the subgrade will have a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value of 5 and a modulus of subgrade reaction value of k = 125 pci, provided the subgrade is prepared in general accordance with our recommendations. We recommend that at a minimum, 24 inches of the existing subgrade material be moisture conditioned (as necessary) and recompacted to prepare for the construction of pavement sections. Deeper levels of recompaction may be necessary in areas where existing utilities are present. The subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. In place density tests should be performed to verify proper moisture content and adequate compaction. The recommended flexible and rigid pavement sections are based on design CBR and modulus of subgrade reaction (k) values that are achieved, only following proper subgrade preparation. It should be noted that subgrade soils that have relatively high silt contents may be highly sensitive to moisture conditions. The subgrade strength and performance characteristics of a silty subgrade material may be dramatically reduced if this material becomes wet. Based on our knowledge of the proposed project, we expect the traffic to range from light duty (passenger automobiles) to heavy duty (delivery trucks). The following tables show the recommended pavement sections for light duty and heavy duty use. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (FLEXIBLE) PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY Asphaltic Concrete Aggregate Base* Compacted Subgrade* ** 3 in. 6.0 in. 24.0 in, * 95% compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557 ** A proof roll may be performed in lieu of in place density tests HEAVY DUTY Asphaltic Concrete Aggregate Base* Compacted Subgrade* ** 4 in. 6.0 in. 24.0 in, Stantec * 95% compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557 ** A proof roll may be performed in lieu of in place density tests December 5, 2013 Project No. 185750173 16 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 9: Construction Field Reviews PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (RIGID) PAVEMENT Min. PCC Depth Aggregate Base* Compacted Subgrade* ** 6.0 in. 6.0 in. 24.0 in. * 95% compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557 ** A proof roll may be performed in lieu of in place density tests The asphaltic concrete depth in the flexible pavement tables should be a surface course type asphalt, such as Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 1/2 inch HMA. The rigid pavement design is based on a Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) mix that has a 28 day compressive strength of 4,000 pounds per square inch (psi). The design is also based on a concrete flexural strength or modulus of rupture of 550 psi. Aggregate base should generally consist of 4 to 6 inches of WSDOT Base Course overlain by 2 inches of WSDOT Top Course (1-1/4" crushed and 5/8" crushed respectively). 9 CONSTRUCTION FIELD REVIEWS Stantec should be retained to provide part time field review during construction in order to verify that the soil conditions encountered are consistent with our design assumptions and that the intent of our recommendations is being met. This will require field and engineering review to: - ■- -Monitor and test structural fill placement and -compaction -- ■ Verify footing drain placement • Observe overexcavation work for foundation elements • Verify the soil bearing at foundation locations for the building and vault ■ Verify slab subgrade and capillary break material below slab -on -grade • Inspection of roadway subgrade areas prior to fill placement • Inspection of proof -roll testing Geotechnical design services should also be anticipated during the subsequent final design phase to support the structural design and address specific issues arising during this phase. Field and engineering review services will also be required during the construction phase in order to provide a Final Letter for the project. 10 CLOSURE This report was prepared for the exclusive use of XMR, Inc. and their appointed consultants. Any use of this report or the material contained herein by third parties, or for other than the intended purpose, should first be approved in writing by Stantec. December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 117 (Th Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Section 10: Closure The recommendations contained in this report are based on assumed continuity of soils with those of our test holes, and assumed structural loads. Stantec should be provided with final architectural and structural drawings when they become available in order that we may review our design recommendations and advise of any revisions, if necessary. Use of this report is subject to the Statement of General Conditions provided in Appendix A. It is the responsibility of XMR, Inc. who is identified as "the Client" within the Statement of General Conditions, and its agents to review the conditions and to notify Stantec should any of these not be satisfied. Respectfully submitted, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Original signed by: Original signed by: Phil Haberman, P.G., P.E.G. Gopal A. Singam, P.E. -Senior Engineering -Geologist - Senior Geotechnical Engineer- PH/gs December 5, 2013 Stantec Project No. 185750173 1 18 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Appendix A — Statement of General Conditions One Team.Infinite Solutions. Stantet APPENDIX A Statement of General Conditions o 0 Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Appendix A — Statement of General Conditions STATEMENT OF GENERAL CONDITIONS USE OF THIS REPORT: This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Client or its agent and may not be used by any third party without the express written consent of Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. and the Client. Any use which a third party makes of this report is the responsibility of such third party. BASIS OF THE REPORT: The information, opinions, and/or recommendations made in this report are in accordance with Stantec Consulting Services' present understanding of the site specific project as described by the Client. The applicability of these is restricted to the site conditions encountered at the time of the investigation or study. If the proposed site specific project differs or is modified from what is described in this report or if the site conditions are altered, this report is no longer valid unless Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. is requested by the Client to review and revise the report to reflect the differing or modified project specifics and/or the altered site conditions. STANDARD OF CARE: Preparation of this report, and all associated work, was carried out in accordance with the normally accepted standard of care in the state of execution for the specific professional service provided to the Client. No other warranty is made. INTERPRETATION OF SITE CONDITIONS: Soil, rock, or other material descriptions, and statements regarding their condition, made in this report are based on site conditions encountered by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. at the time of the work and at the specific testing and/or sampling locations. Classifications and statements of condition have been made in accordance with normally accepted practices which are judgmental in nature; no specific description should be considered exact, but rather reflective of the anticipated material behavior. Extrapolation of in situ conditions can -only be -made to some limited -extent beyond the- sampling - or test points. --The extent dependson - variability of the soil, rock and groundwater conditions as influenced by geological processes, construction activity, and site use. VARYING OR UNEXPECTED CONDITIONS: Should any site or subsurface conditions be encountered that are different from those described in this report or encountered at the test locations, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. must be notified immediately to assess if the varying or unexpected conditions are substantial and if reassessments of the report conclusions or recommendations are required. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. will not be responsible to any party for damages incurred as a result of failing to notify Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. that differing site or sub -surface conditions are present upon becoming aware of such conditions. PLANNING, DESIGN, OR CONSTRUCTION: Development or design plans and specifications should be reviewed by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., sufficiently ahead of initiating the next project stage (property acquisition, tender, construction, etc), to confirm that this report completely addresses the elaborated project specifics and that the contents of this report have been properly interpreted. Specialty quality assurance services (field observations and testing) during construction are a necessary part of the evaluation of sub -subsurface conditions and site preparation works. Site work relating to the recommendations included in this report should only be carried out in the presence of a qualified geotechnical engineer; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. cannot be responsible for site work carried out without being present. One Team. Infinite Solutions. c� o Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Appendix B — Figures: Site and Vicinity Maps One Team. Infinite Solutions. Stantec APPENDIX B Figures: Site and Vicinity Maps B-1 Approximate Boring Location HB -1 Approximate Hand Boring Location B-101 Approximate Boring Location (HDR) B-404 All Locations Approximate Proposed Convenience Store and Fuel Station, 13310 Interurban Ave. S., Tukwila, WA Dec. 2, 2013 Drawn By: PAH Checked By: GS Client: XMR, Inc. Figure 2 Site Plan c o Tukwila, WA Geotechnical Investigation Appendix C — Borehole Log Records One Team. Infinite Solutions. Stantec APPENDIX C Borehole Log Records J PROJECT: Proposed Fuel Station and Convenience Store LOCATION: 13310 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, WA PROJECT NUMBER: 185760173 WELL / PROBEHOLE / BOREHOLE NO: B-1 PAGE 1 OF 1 starts DRILLING / INSTALLATION: NORTHING (ft): EASTING (ft): STARTED 11/19/13 COMPLETED: 11/19/13 LAT: LONG: DRILLING COMPANY: Davies GROUND ELEV (ft): TOC ELEV (ft): INITIAL DTW (ft): 16 WELL DEPTH (ft): --- DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Track Rig STATIC DTW (ft): Not Encountered BOREHOLE DEPTH (ft): 26.5 DRILLING METHOD: HSA WELL CASING DIA. (in): --- BOREHOLE DIA. (in): 8 SAMPLING EQUIPMENT: Split Spoon LOGGED BY: PH CHECKED BY: GS U USCS I'. d *igR" Blow Count Headspace PID (units) m a� a g' Description a Time 5 al H 0 ct Sample ID g 6 g i o- Grass/Topsoil 1 MLS MLS; Very soft, silt with fine sand, dark yellowish brown to yellowish _ 1.5 1 brown, moist to very moist. (Alluvium) 2 5 — 1 5- ML ML; Very soft to soft, silt layered with organics/peat and sand, yellowish 1 0 brown to olive gray, moist to very moist. (Alluvium) 1 10-- 1 10 10--1 X 1 1 15- 1 15 -- J SP SP; Medium dense to dense, fine to medium grained sand with variable amounts of silt, gray to dark gray, wet. (Alluvium) 1.5 6 8 •V J 20- 4 20- 1.5 10 16 - 25- 5 25- x / 1.5 20 20 Borehole terminated at 26.5 feet. i - - PROJECT: Proposed Fuel Station and Convenience Store LOCATION: 13310 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, WA PROJECT NUMBER:185750173 U F 2 Fa V1 C7 z � 5 WELL / PROBEHOLE / BOREHOLE B-2 NO: 06 PAGE 1 OF 1 StanMc EASTING (ft): LONG: TOC ELEV (ft): WELL DEPTH (ft): --- BOREHOLE DEPTH (ft): 21.5 --- BOREHOLE DIA. (in): 8 CHECKED BY: GS DRILLING / INSTALLATION: STARTED 11/19/13 COMPLETED: 11/19/13 DRILLING COMPANY: Davies DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Track Rig DRILLING METHOD: HSA SAMPLING EQUIPMENT: Split Spoon NORTHING (ft): LAT: GROUND ELEV (ft): INITIAL DTW (ft): 13 STATIC DTW (ft): Not Encountered WELL CASING DIA. (in): LOGGED BY: PH E y i= g) C7 Description co me Sample ID Measures Recov. (feet) Blow Count m o- E m o'? Grass/Topsoil 2 SM SM; Loose, silty sand with gravel, yellowish brown, moist. (Fill) 1.5 2 4 ML T ML; Very soft to soft, silt layered with organics/peat and sand, yellowish brown to olive gray, moist to very moist. (Alluvium) — 5- 1.5 0 0 10 10 — 2 ML ML; Soft, silt with variable amounts of sand, grayish brown to olive gray, 1.5 1 i moist to very moist. (Alluvium) 1 - 151 15— SP SP; Medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, gray to dark gray, wet. 1 5 (Alluvium) i 4 - 20— 4 20-. . 1 11 15 Borehole terminated at 21.5 feet. ) PROJECT: Proposed Fuel Station and Convenience Store LOCATION: 13310 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, WA PROJECT NUMBER: 186750173 WELL / PROBEHOLE / BOREHOLE NO: uup HB -1 PAGE 1 OF 1 'SFai1x DRILLING / INSTALLATION: NORTHING (ft): EASTING (ft): STARTED 11/19/13 COMPLETED: 11/19/13 LAT: LONG: DRILLING COMPANY: StanteC GROUND ELEV (ft): TOC ELEV (ft): INITIAL DTW (ft): 14 WELL DEPTH (ft): --- DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Augers STATIC DTW (ft): Not Encountered BOREHOLE DEPTH (ft): 17.0 DRILLING METHOD: Augers WELL CASING DIA. (in): --- BOREHOLE DIA. (in): 3 SAMPLING EQUIPMENT: Grab LOGGED BY: PH CHECKED 8Y: GS y{r V Description E Time 2 ._ n" o 0g' j Sample ID 6 2 3 o _ o Grass/Topsoil MLS MLS; Very soft, silt with fine sand, dark yellowish brown to yellowish brown, moist to very moist. (Alluvium) 5 5— � ML ML; Very soft to soft, silt layered with organics/peat and sand, yellowish brown to olive gray, moist to very moist. (Alluvium) 10 s 10— 7 15 , SP SP; Medium dense to dense, fine to medium grained 15-- sand with variable amounts of silt, gray to dark gray, wet. (Alluvium) Borehole terminated at 17 feet. D 3 i a D PROJECT: Proposed Fuel Station and Convenience Stork LOCATION: 13310 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, WA PROJECT NUMBER: 185750173 o 5 WELL / PROBEHOLE 1 BOREHOLE NO: f B-2 PAGE 1 OF 1 ' lEntec DRILLING / INSTALLATION: NORTHING (ft): EASTING (ft): STARTED 11/19/13 COMPLETED: 11/19/13 LAT: LONG: DRILLING COMPANY: StanteC GROUND ELEV (ft): TOC ELEV (ft): INITIAL DTW (ft): 15 WELL DEPTH (ft): --- DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Augers STATIC DTW (ft): Not Encountered BOREHOLE DEPTH (ft): 16.0 DRILLING METHOD: Augers WELL CASING DIA. (in): --- BOREHOLE DIA. (in): 3 SAMPLING EQUIPMENT: Grab LOGGED BY: PH CHECKED BY: GS U ct) Sample I • a 1g. Blow l Count 1 lo E a gip— e ., N 0 D Description Sample ID p ��-� 'a'c g .. aa, 0-- x MES Grass/fopsoil - MLS; Very soft, silt with fine sand, dark yellowish brown to yellowish brown, moist to very moist. (Alluvium) ' ML ML; Very soft to soft, silt layered with organics/peat and sand, yellowish 5 brown to olive gray, moist to very moist. (Alluvium) 10 10-- 15 SP; Medium dense to dense, fine to medium grained sand with variable SP amounts of silt, gray to dark gray, wet. (Alluvium) v 15— f5 15-- Borehole terminated at 16 feet. , _ - i i r • L L (Th Date drilled 11/1/91 LOG OF BORING NO. B-101 Driving Weight and Drop 140 Ib / 30" Sheet 1 of 3 Elevation (ft) 1111._ Depth, ft 5 IV > 00 ... in sn 1 E eV tr3 Blows/S" Graphic Symbol Uirt;20-3 4.1...7.t.: n.,=g1v.RXT-0 5-zow,.-44 -0 vw908a..0 0=0,2Ape K40145 FiAgen7 . LoPar2., yng"b ew tri a 0' Fogg, .4 , , 5 ..:-....,.. .0 IL -.15.4 .=.1.... ...... m ..... z5C12 = E;z0.22 vs 9 ^ rii, 0 D g• -0 7. Erg rp owcr —E. ^wo.4.... e E. g• Observation Well Dry density pcf X GI L • 10 CO ...4— o C c..) 4_14 0 0 L 2 - - - - 10- - - 15- - 115- 110- 105- 100-6 IR 2R 3R 4R 5R 6R •••••• *** .0.... •• ••••• *** *SS Fill SANDY GRAVEL; brown, fine to coarse, fine to coarse gravel, some crushed, little silt, trace organic, very moist, loose .• 23 76 96 63 37 P A A P,A 5 7 • . :. Recent Alluvium SILTY SAND; mottled gray, brown, and rust, trace fine gravel, trace wood fragments, very moist, very loose (OVA=3.8 ppm) SILT AND PEAT; gray and dark brown, peat in beds up to 2" thick, wet, soft maig --(OVA=1.7 ppm) ORGANIC SILT; gray to brown, few fine sand some peat laminae up to 1/4" thick, wet, soft (OVA=0.3 ppm) 2/5/92 - 12=2-91 2 'a''E WIZ 2 MollIC 3 3 2 1 3 i 1 MAC 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4- - 2 2 SILT; gray to brown, with organic atter, few ne sand, wet, soft 11-18-91 (OVA=0.3 ppm) --gray, little organic matter, fine to medium sand partings 1/16" to 1/4" thick, few wood fragments (OVA=0.3 ppm) - 11 20 30 ...--- SAND; black, fine to medium, few silt, indistinct • lamination, wet, dense : --(OVA=0.3 ppm) Continued Next Page TASK 219 - INTERURBAN PROJECT Tukwila, Washington for HDR Engineering, Inc. Project No. 92-35115 Converse Consultants NW Geotechnical Engineering and Applied, Earth Sciences Figure No. A-1 Date drilled 11/1/91 LOGOF BORING NO. B-101 Driving Weight and Drop 140 ib / 30" Sheet 2 of 3 E Elevation (ft) 116 Depth, ft C o — 4- to > GI LTJ to (u — a. e easimplification in Blous/6" Graphic Symbol a..rniovs?: FPI stAg 15 a 000! 2. P.4 70:1 flt 01 red: tri vi a...WE Foe a ° —t•Z'tQl g g rigircr Z -IS.= • P.2 .•< '3. 0 274.10% or:3 tigl tar.:^0 o Wlg•§..gt wrg . Observation Dry density pcf Moisture Content, % Other tests - _ - - 25- — - - 30- - _ — - ... _ - 95- 90- 85- 80- 7 8 9 10 ,' 110/4 ::: ,-.,• `' • '.-... • ,....... 13 .:, 19 -•.'. 25 ' :.:.:'-': . -• : . . • • . . • • - , . -.• • • ' - • . • --black to dark gray, trace wood fragments, laminated with fine sand =i,j 1- :. ::: :.. . -• •:•• . ... .. ,, .i . , , • • 5 4 9 1 19 17 20 d,..1 leibi lell; IE, - SILT; gray to brown, wet, stiff ::: .,. .. . ..- ..-.; -.--. •,-:::,:- ---., ::'...= • . .- •:-• SANDY GRAVEL and SILT; interbedded, no sample recovered, occasional cobbles SILTY CLAY; mottled gray and brown, with interbeds of sandy gravel, wet, very stiff to hard Estuarine Deposits GRAVELLY SAND; gray, with silt, some shell fragments, dense DO/6 P. ,V. -,..•-.- . Bedrock COAL; black, with interbeds of dark brown siltstone, moderately soft .. . ,...1::::'.;, ;::.:.. Bottom of boring at 38.0 feet depth Piezometer installed in boring, screen section from 28.0 to 30.0 feet P=Petroleum fuel hydrocarbon testing Continued Next Page TASK 219 - INTERURBAN PROJECT Tukwila, Washington for HDR Engineering, Inc. Project No. 92-35115 Converse Consultants NW Geotechnical Engineering and Applied Earth Sciences Figure No. -A-1 11 1 :1 a u a 11 li L f" 1 L fl • Date drilled 11/1/91 LOG OF BORING NO. B-101 Driving Weight and Drop 140 lb 30" Sheet 3 of 3 Elevation (ft) 116 Depth, ft C o ..... al > o) - W tri — 0. 0 la co 6 \ an 3 0 70 Graphic Symbol This log is part of the report prepared by Converse Consultants NW for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. Thls summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented u a simplification of actual conditions encounterecl. DESCRIPTION C 0 _ 4- al_ > el L= 0 vs _o (o Dry density' pcf Moisture Content, % Other tests R = 3 -inch O.D. Ring Sampler OVA Organic vapor concentration in parts per - 75- million (ppm) 45- - - 70- _ 50- 65- _ • 55 - _ - 60 - TASK 219 - INTERURBAN PROJECT Tukwila, Washington for HDR Engineering, Inc. Converse Consultants NW Geotechnical Engineering and Applied Earth Sciences Project No. 92-35115 Figure No. A-1 0 Date drilled 6/16/92 LOG OF BORING NO. B-404 Driving Weight and Drop 140 1h / Ill" Sheet 1 of 3 Elevation (ft) 119 Depth, ft I C C + b > W Samples Bions/6" Graphic Symbol 11§ rig z KFtig arr. 00-050404 «It Pre 0 OS! 'O •a,.?oro d p Ha s ge z„gig.. or Observaition Wel Dry density pcf Moisture Content, % Other tests Fill _ SILTY SAND; dark brown, fine to coarse, few fine to coarse gravel, with wood mulch; loose, moist • - SAND; brown, fine to .coarse, few silt; very loose to - 115- loose, moist 5-- 1 1 — _ 2 - 'e , , i 1 1 Recent Alluvium - 1 1 1 ORGANIC SILT; finely laminated gray and brown, 1 1 with fibrous peat; firm, very moist - 110- 1 1 f 1 1 10— 1 1 — 3 1 1 1 - 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 111 _ 111 1 1 - 1 S 111 105 1 1 t 111 15— 3 0 SILT; gray -brown, finely laminated, trace to little - 2 1 fibrous organic matter; soft, very moist 2 ' ' ORGANIC SILT; gray and brown, finely laminated, _ 4TW f i t ! some fibrous organics; soft, very moist - 100- / GRAVELLY SAND; medium dense 5 1 6 • ' Continued Next Page TASK 219 - INTERURBAN PROJECT Tukwila, Washington for HDR Engineering, Inc. Project No. 92-35115 Geotechnical Engineering (ipure No. Converse Consultants NW and Applied Earth Sciences A-14 (-1 Date drilled 6/16/92 LOG OF BORING NO. Er4104 Driving Weight and Drop 140 Ib / 30" Sheet 2 of 3 Elevation (ft) _119_ Depth, ft cf 0 4- al > iv - w vi — Q. E al cri Blows/6" Graphic Symbol This log is part of the report prepared by Converse CoastAtlantic. NW for the named projeet and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This sumrnary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ st other location* and may change st this location with the passage of tune. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Observation Well Dry density pcf Moisture Content, Other tests 25- 30- - 35- - 95- 85- 80- 6 R -I 8 R-2 R -3.. j 6- • • — . PL PL 32 Highly Weathered Bedrock (Tukwila Formation) GRAYWACKE SANDSTONE; gray, fine to coarse angular sand grains; highly weathered to a very dense silty fine to medium sand consistency TD C c =N 1— 50/-- 5"—.----.----; .L—.--=.--- - . - - . - - • rr, 50/ — •1--- Run 1 (27.5 to 32.5 feet) Recovery = 0%, RQD -= 0 Run 2 (32.5 to 37.5 feet) Recovery = 80%, RQD = 68 33.0 to 34.8 ft, little recovery, very closely spaced fractures, possibly mechanical 34.6 to 35.8 ft, very closely spaced fractures, 20 to 40 degrees 34.8 to 38.0 ft, moderately spaced fractures, probably echanical ---.- ..:_--" ..;_....="7" .==-7 '-7--- ,_. 20 50/"..--'---*- 3 — ---, --...-..-. 7=7z- _ -- ..-_-_-. _-_... SANDY SILTSTONE; brown, with organic matter and , !thin peat lamina, bedding 40 -degrees from horizontal, highly weathered, very soft rock; highly weathered to a stiff sandy silt soil consistency ,36.6 ft, fracture, 40 degree, irregular 1 GRAYWACKE SANDSTONE; gray, rine to coarse sand — ___---- -'very •--.- . - - - • -" 1 - - .. - •---•=Th Continued Next Page TASK 219 - INTERURBAN PROJECT Tukwila, Washington for HDR Engineering, Inc. Project No. 92-35115 Converse Consultants NW Geotechnical Engineering and Applied Earth Sciences Figure No. A-14 1 1: j a • .14 e Pate drilled 6/16/92 LOG OF BORING NO. 8.404 Driving Weight and Drop 140 lh / 30" Sheet 3 of 3 Elevation (ft) 119 1 Depth, ft I — C +. 0 W d — o.3 E N a m o ' Graphic Symbol This log is part of the report prepared by Converse Consultants NW for the named project and should be read together with that report for complete interpretation. This summety applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at thin • location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplitieation of actual conditions encountered. DESCRIPTION Observation Weil_ Dry density pcf Moisture Content, % Other tests with few fine to coarse gravel, finely laminated with fine black organic matter, highly weathered, very soft; .� ':= rock is highly weathered to a very dense silty sand soil consistency •=+- '. 37.1 ft, mechanical fracture, 25 degree, irregular R-4 ^ ._•:_.=-1- 37.9 ft, mechanical fracture 38.0 to 39.0 ft, closely spaced mechanical fractures PL —: - 75� ,-..-.-=-:' 39.7 ft, mechanical fracture, 25 degree, irregular 40.4 ft, joint fractures, 15 and 50 degrees PL 41.0 ft, mechanical, 10 degrees . 45- 42.8 ft, mechanical, 10 degrees - e �. • 43.0 ft, mechanical Run 4 (43.0 TO 46.0 feet) PL _ Widely spaced mechanical fractures 43.2 to 43.3 ft, joint fractures, 10 degrees _ ,43.4 to 43.8 ft, mechanical fractures 6.0 ft, mechanical fracture _ 70- Bottom of borehole at depth 46.0 feet. Borehole backfilled with bentonite chips. 50-• - 65- • 55- - 60 - TASK 219 - INTERURBAN PROJECT Tukwila, Washington for HDR Engineering, Inc. Project No. 92-35115 figure No. Geotechnical Engineering Converse Consultants NW and Applied Earth Sciences A-14 STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: _planning(a)TukwilaWA.gov RECEIVED JAN 282014 NI AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS OVbLOP ! Y phV��Ut ME,NT PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, ei*lieers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at ''‘ 31 0 0 / Q A-). , So •'T GUJ Gr, f g/te 3 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at k kk \lc;\ (city), W -A (state), on C242)VISUYl (Print Name) 1330 -1-,e-rur 01v -CSO ,20 'KP�P_Cr (Address) t � -43:3 —01.49 (Phone Number) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me eiCeCLR,ft_ , 1 e>+.V S D pl to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that heepsigned the same as his/e voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED 0 U���ORE ME ON HIS DAY OF J6�1/t , //�� "" "" , 20 C , aA,,,,itc./ k oi.,4,;‘,, , , ... • _ 0, , NOTARY PUBLIC in and for t) State of Washington 1 residing at L/ (_'7 LA�./!it '�Ue�• 4., O t My Commission expires on ^ 19 c 1 N � 10-19' •0 .: OF W ASS •Fh H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.doc May 23, 2011 CITY OF TUKWILA RECEIVED Department of Community Development8 2014 DESIGN REVIEW - 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA031if Nl l t. ADMINISTRATIVE Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (2065V3` -156 MENT E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -DR Planner: File Number: CA(.._ 0na� Application Complete Date: Project File Number: Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: e.. -/q-___601) d NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Petterson Truck Fueling Station LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 13100 48th Ave South LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 000300-0045 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Carl Nelson Address: 1932 First Ave, Suite 307 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 920-5636 FAX: E-mail: carl.nelson@stantec.com Signature: a/4— Date: 01/27/2014 H:\L.and Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Administrative-Jan201 1.doc March 24, 2011 0- -71; GN 48TH AVE. S. -TYPE 1 LANDSCAPING FRONT "'0.._ _ _. " .. _. - TREES: 1 PER EACH 30 LF EXCLUDING CURBCUTS (=5 TREES) - SHRUBS 1 PER EACH 7 LE, EXCLUDING CURB CUTS OR 24'P1ANlE0 BERM (=21 SHRUBS) - GROUNDCOVER 11) 4', ■ 0 {/ ) - 0 es 442k �' TYPE 2 LANDSCAPING: SIDE` - TREES: 1 PER EACH 20 LF EkC4U01(IG CURB -S (=6 TRE) - SHRUBS: 1 PER EACH 5 LF, EXCNOING CURB MATS (=26 SHRUBS) - GROUNOCOVER LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE no ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. ■ (22449 !NTERs, 5 5' LANDSCAPE 0E0 PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED * ISMS TREE 70 BEREMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED SCREENING WALL -000 «: TYPE 2 LANDSCAPING. SIDE -TREES: 1 PER EACH 20 LF EXCLUDING 00760015 (=9 TREES) -SHRUBS: 1 PER EACH 5 LF, EXCLUDING CURB CUTS (=35 SHRUBS) -600*000OVER PLANT SCHEDULE TREES SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA 1128114 Id VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5027 51ST AVENUE SW SEATTLE, WA 98136 CONTACT: AKEMI SAKAIDA, LA PHONE: (206) 923-0590 EMAIL akemiOnwlink.Com GOVERNING AGENCIES PLANNING CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD X100 TIIKVALA, WA 98188 CONTACT: MINNIE DHALIWAL PHONE: (206) 431-3670 EMAIL: minnie.dholiwal®tukwilowa.gov OJANTITY SZE (MIN.) SPACING (MAX.) NOTES STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT *EU RAE SAKNOA CERTIFICATE NO. 794 (6060S 06/16/14 EXISTING TREES 10 BE REMOVED CARPINUS BETULAS 'FRAN5 FONTAINE' FRANS FONTAINE HORNBEAM MALAS RED BARRON' RED BARRON CRABAPPLE THUJA PUCATA SASIIOAIA' HOGAN CEDAR 2 ' CAL. (MIN.) AS 240WN 2' CAL (MIN.) 20' 6' TALL AS SHOW CONFIRM REMOVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE SNMP.ROOTS AND AUL DEMI. MATCHING FORM, SINGLE TRUNK, MIN, BRANCHING HGT. 5' MATCHING FORM, SINGLE TRUNK, MIN. BRANCH HEIGHT 5' SINGLE TRUNK, FULL SHRUBS SCIENTIFIC NAME SYMBOL COMMON NAME COANTITY SIZE (MIN.) SPASTIC (MAX.) NOTES 0 GROUNDCOVER SYMBOL MAHONIA AQUIFODUM 18 2 GALLON AS SHOWN FULL MATCHING TALL OREGON GRAPE RHODODENDRON P.M' 13 5 GALLON AS SHOWN MILL MATCHING PJM 700000EN070N COTONEASTER PARKS! 12 2 GALLON A5 SHOWN FULL MATCHNG PARNE01 COTONEAS1ER PINUS MUGHO 9 2 601105 A5 SHOWN FULL. MATCHING MUGHO PINE RIBES 5ANGUINE90 3 GALLON A5 SHOWN FULLMULTI-STEM RO0ERING CURRANT P01ENTIILA 'MANGO TANGO' 6 1 GALLON AS SHOWN FULL0ULIFSO:M MANGO TANGO CINOUIFOIL VIBURNUM CANDII 33 2 GALLON AS SHOWN FULL MULTI BRANCHED DAVID'S NBURNUM VIBURNUM THUS 23 2 GALLON A5 SHOWN FULL. MATCHING SPRING BOUQUET NBURNUM SCIENTINC NAME COMMON NAME NOTE: - SHRUBS TO BE 18" TALL MINIMUM, INCREASE CONTAINER SZE TO MEET REQUIREMENT QUANTITY SIZE (MIN.) SPACING (MAX.) NOTES GRASS PERENNIAL RYE MI1 770700EED 1EUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS GERMANDER INCA MINOR, PERIMINKLE 3700 SF - 110 1 GALLON 24' TRIANGULAR INSTALL PER MFG. RECOMMENDATIONS, NO NET SOD IF DURING MINTER SEASON FULL MULTI STEMMED, HEALTHY 215 1 GALLON 24' TRIANGULAR FULL BUSHY, MULTI -STEM NOTE: - CONTRACTOR 10 VERIFY GIANT N FOR GROUNDCOVER. GROUNDCOVER NOT REWIRED IN TREE WILLS OR 000070EATH SHRUBS. / 41-00z1.3 TDG NO. 13035 z V CO0 iY 0 PermitSeal TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48th Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 L m • q S PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN ORIGIHAI SHEET -NCH 0 Project Number: 2007833019 Ole Nome: Own. Chkd. Oson. 15.40.20 Drawing No. L1 Revision Sheet 1 of 1 3 (4) 2-8" DIAMETER INTERNAL BACK LIGHT SIGNS. LOCATED AS PER DETAIL 5 ON THIS SHEET. CLAD COLUMNS FUEL PUMP 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1 -0" 76 5 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16 = 1 -C" 5 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1 -0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16' = 1 -0" 24' 12.1 76 45/ !/ Cle.renea 14'6" Zo 0 OASIS WHITE OASIS SILVER (decal recommended) ALIGN TOP OF REDS Maximum height of Red on column is 30' o Valance Q Pump topper (15' x 24") © Safety Decal OMPD © Flag Mount - Fueling Position Amenity "Combo Unit" 0 Clearance Decal OASIS SILVER OASIS RED OASIS RED` CHARCOAL, GRAY OR DARK GRAY 5 TYPICAL DETAILS NOT TO SCALE 611/--c4oca 0 5 -5 2 0 (13 3 a PemvtSeal TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S - Tuckwila, WA 98168 Project Number: 2007833019 File Nome: Own. Chkd. Dsun. YY.MM.DD Drawing No. Revision Sheet 2 of 2 INTERURBAN AVE S. / FUEL PLAN 1.8 1:20 NORTH 2),71 2 VICINITY MAP �x4\ NTS R rnu,w 911,E* - ARCM 0 — SUBJECT SITE LOT SIZE_ 41,315 SF 454T , MODIFIED DRIVE EX. DRIVE f 48TH AVE S 841.45'43'V 1399.73' (MFJS.) 0 49-0" MODIFIED DRIVE -yam PYLON SIGN -0 00 / - EXIT ONLY SIGN TYP OF 2 - 0� '0 . 0 EX. DRIVE._,. _i 9-0" ° IU Z h a I� - NEWSIDWALK 66-11' O 25'.0" LANDSCAPE 134'-9" •---- FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED - FUELING ISLAND WITH DISPENSER. SEE ELEVATIONS �- UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS ENTER ONLY SIGN T89 OF 2 25'-0" _ NEW PROPANE TANK ti PROPOSED 25 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN PROCESS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 35.119 SF = 85% ZONING: CLI - COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FOSTER STEPHEN -D C # 38 CYRUS C LEWIS DC #37 POR SD DC #38 & POR DC #371N SECS 11-14 & 15-23-04 DAF - BEG AT CONCRETE MON AT NXN OF C/L OF SEA TRANS LN R/W WITH C/L OF 48TH AVE SO AF #6313596 TH N 41-45-35 E ALG SD C/L 270 FT TH S 48-14-25 E 25 FT TO SELY MGN OF SD AVE & TPOB TH CONT S 48-14-25 E 144.98 FT TO NWLY MGN OF PSH NO 1 TH N 52-46-36 E ALG SD NWLY MGN 268.65 FT TH N 48-14-25 W 196.32 FT TO SELY MGN SD AVE TH S 41-45-35 W 263.70 FT TO TPOB TOTAL OF 1.033 AC M/L PARCEL NUMBER: 000300-0045 I-5 OFF RAMP _ LANpSCAPE (E) WSDOT FENCE h 23'-0" — NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE L/c/-0003 r Z e w IU1 Q. Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING ISLAND co cTO 8 S 8 Y 8 9 : tl a Project Number: 2007833019 re Nome: Dxn. 004. Dp, W.1.114.00 Drawing No. Revision Sheet 1 Dt- 2 ;oj 'I EAST ELEVATION I = 1" a -- CLAD COLUMNS — FUEL PUMP WEST cr—vir ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16- = 1'-0 OYJW MEET - ARC SOUTH ELEVATION MACE -371S =1 L 24"12' I 76 \71115. Clearer 14'e' 0 OASIS WHITE OASIS SILVER (decal recommended) AUGN TOP OF REDS Maximum height of Red on column is 30' 5 TYPICAL DETAILS NO1 TO SCALE o Valance © Pump topper (15" 0 241 © Safety Decal o MPD ® Flag MOUnt 6 Fuming P41910011 O Amenity "Combo Unit" 0 Clearance Decal OASIS SILVER ' OASIS RED OASIS RED ` CHARCOAL, GRAY OR DARK GRAY Llq -00M Z 0 cn • w = w Penr1l•Seal TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S - Tuckwila, WA 98168 0 U 0 Project Number: 2007833019 Flic Nome. o.". chte, ox". W.uN.00 Drawing No. Revision Sheet 2 of- 2 fie 170.75-ONLCrg DulrJon27,2014 01:54 PM LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED 03 Bi 04 0 v N 0 C: • ♦ 40 PROPERTY LINE R.O.W. CENTERLINE EASEMENT A.C. PAVING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL GRADING CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION SWALE GRADE BREAK WATER MAIN SEWER MAIN STORM DRAIN FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER GATE VALVE SEWER MANHOLE STORM CB STORM MANHOLE ELECTRICAL LINE TELEPHONE LINE GAS UNE POWER VAULT UTILITY POLE STREET LIGHT I NEW 45.11 -WIDE DRWY. 74-45'43'W 1359.73' :9401 0 : Pz s NEW 45.0' -WIDE DRWY. rAW 48TH AVE. S. ,otil"p` NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA PROPERTY INFO PARCEL N0: 000300-0045 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION ( AND CLA11A NO 38. AND OF THE CYRUS C LEWIS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SEC11055 11, 14 AND 15 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANCE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGION, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE TRANSMISSION UNE RIGHT OF WAY, WITH THE CENTERLINE OF 4810 AVENUE SOUTH A5 RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO. 6313596, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THENCE NORTH 41'45'35• EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 270 00 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 4814'25• EAST 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 4814'25' EAST 144.98 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 1, AS ESTABLISHED 8Y JJDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAUSE NO 591370 THENCE NORTH 52'46'36' EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN 268.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4814'75 WEST 196.32 FEET TO THE SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARCH OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 41'4535 WEST ALONG SMD MARGIN 263.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BASIS OF BEARING SOUTH 8815'57" EAST, AS MEASURED BETWEEN WGS HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 93H-902 AND 93H-901 (NAD 83/91) 0fRTICAL DATUM WOS VERTICAL CONTROL POINT NO. 930-513, BEING THE TOP OF FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE AT 111E INTERSECTION OF S. 144TH ST., 51ST AVE. 5. AND MACADAM RD. S. ELEV. = 160.18 'JS FEET (NAY) 88) tz wm.. 520114A:10 I0 0482; -�_-----�-.moo--� NEW-PEANTFH N41'4: 4}F 2` IIS — - • SIGN SIGN 1 EX. CNC SIDEWALK NEW PLANTER 1 T•:: EX FIRE HYDRANT BOUNDARY UNE ( a ADJUSTMENT z (DESIGN BY OTHERS) 908078 EX. BLDG.. PARKING LOT 8 PLANTERS 77 / / / 44147'20'37R, GRAPHIC SCALE o le 2o (IN FEET ) 1 inch 20 !l. ABOVE GROU440 TANK & CONC. PAD ETV a'N'IEH NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE '• ARCH, PLANS 1 INTE�ATE 5 S52'g54,.-7� r . VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM CIVIL ENGINEER TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5027 51ST AVENUE SW SEATTLE, WA 98136 CONTACT: PEDRO DEGUZMAN, PE PHONE: (206) 923-0590 EMAIL: pedro6nwlink.com GOVERNING AGENCIES CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTITCENTER BOULEVARD /100 TUKWILA. WA 98188 CONTACT: DAME) MCPHERSON PHONE: (206) 431-2448 PROJECT DATA EX. PROPERTY AREA= 45,000 SF (1.03 AC) NEW PROPERTY AREA= 41,315 5F (0.95 AC) EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: SITE STRIPPING = 459 BCY SUBGRADE CUT = 351 BCY SU8GRADE FILL = 375 ROY • FOR PERMIT USE ONLY EX. IMPERVIOUS AREA. 31,156 SF PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREA- 35.341 SF NEI CHANGE IMPERVIOUS AREA= 44185 SF SHEET INDEX CI PRELIMINARY PAVING PLAN C2 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN ‘,/q -00o3 Omar: ucr - .ICH 0 TDG NO. 13035 2 3 s4 s EL z 0 Q CC g w Li 3 a Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48th Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 PRELIMINARY PAVING PLAN Project Number 2007833019 File Nome: Own. GKE. Nor. YY.44.00 Drawing No. C1 Revision Sheet 1 0f 2 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED 01e30w 0 - .Wax o 8_ W 8' S 12_ D PROPERTY UNE R.O.W. CENTERLINE EASEMENT CONCRETE RETAINING WALL GRADING CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION SWALE GRADE BREAK WATER MAIN SEWER MAIN STORM DRAIN Y FIRE HYDRANT fa WATER METER N GATE VALVE • SEWER MANHOLE • STORM CB STORM MANHOLE - E - ELECTRICAL UNE - T - TELEPHONE LINE - G - GAS UNE POWER VAULT •' UTIUTY POLE STREET LIGHT <? 8Y cE 0:4.'8.00 IE. '4.00 (09 12'844) 10. 14.40 (Er. IrSEI S NIM- 18.98 [LOVER TO 1875] 14.44 (14. 12'4,) if- 14.30 (E& 18'90 E. 1443 (E4 13'50, = 14'I (CZ .5'1•E) STORMIECH CHAMBER DETENTION SYSTEM IE(OUT)= 15.00 SEE DTI.. (/C2 7, • SSW Rai- tam (.9.022 (cc 12Th) E-8.82 (ER aYSYQ a --c S4I'45..1 3 "'N 1399. /.; IJ lEAS. E8 WATER 1 --E%. 0(4'0. 7i' 44 WIER / CJ404';0..:.-:, FOR INFORMATION CALL STORMTECH (866) 647-3362 SC -740 ENL` CAP 7 SC -740 CHAMBER -( i 3/4 - INCH CLEAN, - OPEN GRADED, ANGOLA AGGREGATE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA - GRANULA.R WELL GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <350 FINES. COMPACT IN 6 IN LIFTS TO 95% PROCTOR DENSITY. SEE THE TABLE OF ACCEPTABLE ALL MATERIALS IN STORMTECH'S DESIGN MANUAL. INSTALLATION MANUAL, OR W8W.STORMIECH.COM. F7. S01I AASHTO M288 CLASS 2 NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND STONE r-51' MN. -ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY TO BE FIELD TESTED GRADE VARIES PER PLAN EL= 19.0 MIN. OVER STORMILCH EL= 17.50 FL- 17.00 I EL= 15. W: BOT. OF LIVE -STORAGE f 01= 14.50: BOT. OF CHAMBERS EL= 14.00: 00T. OF EXCAVATION FRO 500100H ENGINEER TO CONFIRM ADEQUATE BASE THICKNESS PROPOSED 18 CHAMBERS PRYD VOL TEL 15.0 -17.0). 843 CF STORMTECH DETENTION (SC -740 SECTION) SCALE, N.T.S. 48TH AVE. S. =PS.?o'Ir 40 C8/5, TY 2-48' '• can ::1:W0.Yi'z 8E8444 f 4 . „4.'P" ER 15 51048 , a,. • 0.32% FX. 0040.:DEWAEK 20 / 4� TRANSFORMERE / C. CONN. TO JJ EX. 6' ST118 I EX. FIRE HYDRANT I C8 13 STORMFILIER 2 CARTRIDGES 4ar'. RIM. 18.30 IE= 16.00 efl - C8 /4 t STORA4FILTER 3 CARTRIDGES II' RW. 18,30 E. 16.00 NEW 1" DOMESTIC RPBA & HOTBOX. NEW 1" PRIG DEDUCT METER & KVA. 93 /2 ) `G2 L11 [REMOVE) PIM= 11.81" 14.99 114.. 1'.' 014, CB /9 STORMFlLIER 4 CARTRIDGES BIM= 18.50 IE= 16.20 /-C8 S17. TIXRMFILTER 4 CARTRIDGES RIM. 18.50 IE= 16.20 1_548 STORMFILTER 1 CARTRIDGE RIM- 18.50 IE. 16,20 . T.t-&_ 70.3`75 GRAPHIC SCALE O 20 (I5 FEET) 1 inch = 20 ft. INTERSTATE S37'95,44",, 26875,,0 '^i Lly-004 TDG NO.13035 Z E 0 00 U • w a ermit-Seal TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48th Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 Project eanxr 2007833019 0M O.n. Chkd. Denn. YY.MM.00 Drawing No. C2 Revision Sheet 2 of 2 48TH AVE. S. ---TNF 1 LANDSCAPING: FRONT 0 -1RES 1 PER EACH 30 LE EXCLUDING CURB0415 (=5 TRTLS) - SHRUBS. 1 PER EACH 7 LF. EXCLUDING CURB 0115 OR 24'PLANTED BM (.21 SHRUBS) - CROUNOCOVTA /1X1576 190E 10 BE REMOVED • LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE to to I ( IN FEET ) t inch e• 20 It. 150E 2 LANDSCAPING. 510E - TREES 1 PER EACH 20 U E1QU8NG CUR80IT5 (.9 TREES) - SHRUBS. 1 PER EACH 5 LE, EXCLUDING CURB CUTS (=35 SHRUBS) -GIMINOCO'JEA PLANT SCHEDULE TREES 500'100 NAME SN.BOL COMMON NAME NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA. KING COUNTY, WA 1/28/14 6,7 VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1ERRAFORMA DESIGN CROUP. INC. 5027 51ST AVENUE SW SEATTLE, WA 98136 CONTACT: 9911.11 SAKAIDA, LA PHONE: (206) 923-0590 EMAIL: akem10nwlink.com GOVERNING AGENCIES PLANNING CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENIER BOULEVARD #100 TUKWILA, WA 98188 CONTACT: MINNIE DHALIWAL PHONE: (206) 431-3670 EMAIL: minnie.dholiwalOtokwilawo.gov WAN i1T1 SZE (MIN) 5PA000 (MAX.) NOTE0 STATE Li WAS -MUM REGISTERED LANDSCAK ARGYPECT 844004 RAE SAKAIDA 701111CA1E N0. 794 EXPIRES 30/18/14 SHRUBS SYMBOL 1XISPNG TREES TO BE REM0vE0 CLAURA5115 LUTEA YFI I OW WOOD M.A1US REG BARROW RED BARRON CRABAPPLE THUJA PI:CATA '1AS119AIA" HOGAN CEDAR SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 0/041110 rw; GROUNDCOVER 2 CAL. (4481.) AS SH0'OM 2' CAL. (MM.) 25 0" ;841_ AS 910W1 SZE (MIN.) RHODODENDRON 'PJM' HAM RHODODENDRON PINUS 40910 4404)10 PINE RIBES SANGUINEUM FLOWERING CURRANT *88911U.M DA'VIN CAM'S MBUNNUM 'AOURNUM 11X05 SPRING ROJGUET NRLIIDIL'M 00/1044 REM0101. PRIOR TO 00NSTRUCTI01. REMOVE 01UMP,00010 AND ALL DEEP. MATCHING FORM, SINGLE 1DUNN, UN. BRN4F.IMNC HGT 5' MATCHING 101211. SINGLE TRUNK, MIN BRANCH HEIGHT 5' 9501 191.1e8:, FULL SPACNG (MAY.) NOTES 5 GALLON AS FINN FULL. MATCHING 2 GALLON A5 SHOWY FULL 440101100 3 GALLON AS SN0'AN TULLMULD-STEM 2 GALLON A5 SHOWN FUN. NICER BRANCHED 2 GAM ON A5 SHCWi FULL MAT0 840 NOTE: - SHRUBS 10 BL 15 TALL M94MUIJ, INCREASE C SZE 10 MEET 000188EMINI. SCIENTIFIC NAME 5`1000, 01)4180! NAME 000)1011 SZE (MIN.) 550091 (MAX.) NOTES /(/ -oaQ3 GRASS 801591/1 RYE MIX H00R0S1E0 IEULRI.0 CHAMAEDRI5 GERMANDER 11)100 M1NCR. 909001KLE 4503 51 INSTALL PER MFG. NECOMMENUAR3N5, 110 NET SOB 6 DIMING HINTER SEASON I'..] 1 GA11.71 24 ' INIANGJLAP. N8., 440111 8444AYEO, HEALTHY 1 GALLON 24" TRIANGULAR FLU, 8050,, MOLD -STEM TDG NO. 13035 z • 0 2 cf 8 W H U • a ant -Seal CML ENCIHEERIND & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE TRUCK FUELING STATION '41 Project Number: 2007833019 File Nome: Own. Chid. Dena. YY.MM 0D Drawing No. L 1 Revision Sheet of 0 0 INTERURBAN AVE S. 0 4- F-35.5 D/W-1 �---36.1' D/W-] F�- 48TH AVE S 541'45'43"W 1399.73' (MEAS.) —0-- 45-0" 19'-5" MODIFIED DRIVE PYLON SIGN EXIT ONLY SIGN TYP OF EX. DRIVE ENTER ONLY SIGN TYP OF 2 UTILITY SHED 134'-9" NEW SIDWALK FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED m PROVIDE SOUND BARRI PER ACCOUSTICAL REP FUELING ISLAND WITH DISPENSER. SEE ELEVATIONS UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS NORTH 7 FUEL PLAN SCALE 1:20 VICINITY MAP NTS SUBJECT SITE 25-0" LOT SIZE: 41,315 SF �1N0SC,ypE PROPOSED 25 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN PROCESS NEW PROPANE TANK IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 35,119 SF = 85% ZONING: CLI - COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FOSTER STEPHEN -D C # 38 CYRUS C LEWIS DC #37 POR SD DC #38 & POR DC #37 IN SECS 11-14 & 15-23-04 DAF - BEG AT CONCRETE MON AT NXN OF C/L OF SEA TRANS LN R/W WITH C/L OF 48TH AVE SO AF #6313596 TH N 41-45-35 E ALG SD C/L 270 FT TH S 48-14-25 E 25 FT TO SELY MGN OF SD AVE & TPOB TH CONT S 48-14-25 E 144.98 FT TO NWLY MGN OF PSH NO 1 TH N 52-46-36 E ALG SD NWLY MGN 268.65 FT TH N 48-14-25 W 196.32 FT TO SELY MGN SD AVE TH S 41-45-35 W 263.70 FT TO TPOB TOTAL OF 1.033 AC M/L PARCEL NUMBER: 000300-0045 23'-0" 410-1 1_5 OFF RAMP (E) WSDOT FENCE NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE L/q .ocV3 Z 0 V cc r w a Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S - Tukwila, WA 98168 D = S E 5 Project Number. 2007833019 Ale Name: Own. Chke. Dean. 1Y.MM.DD Drawing No. SMEfI -MCN 0 Revision Sheet 1 M 2 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16 = 1 —0" 2WEST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1 —0" (4) 2,8" DIAMETER INTERNAL BACK LIGHT SIGNS. LOCATED AS - PER DETAIL5 ON 4 THIS SHEET. in 3 0 0 CLAD COLUMNS FUEL PUMP 3 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 4 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE?/16 = 1 —0" f EAST NORTH AND SOUTH 5 UTILIY SHED ELEVATIONS COM POS BION ROOFING HARDIE-PLANK SIDING WEST L /9-OOQ3 Z 0 cc a Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S - Tukwila, WA 98168 0 CANOPY ELEVATIONS 8 Project Number. 2007833019 File Name: Own. Cnka Dean. rr.MM.SD Drawing No. FS9 011.1/01. SHEET - MICH Revision Sheet $R 0 GN . ; 0..-.:.--)90613 �In r12:a6 0O um �I UTY SHED / d4 �: ��O�O° TSE 00 Ol.�) TYPE 1 LANDSCAPING: FRONT o - TREES: I PER EACH 30 LF EXCLUDING CURBCUIS (-5 TREES) - SHRUBS: 1 PER EACH 7 LF, EXCLUDING CURB CUTS 0R 24'PLANTEO BERM (=21 SHRUBS) - GROUNDCOVER. SIGN TYPE 2 LANDSCAPING: SIDE -TREES: 1 PER EACH 20 1F EXPLUD1)10 CURBCU - SHRUBS: 1 PER EACH 5 1F, EXCLUDING CURB - GROUNDCOVER n r�� 0 0 I 5 (=6 ERA) 5215 (=26 SHRUBS) e ®®0e LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 0 GRAPHIC SCALE no ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch - 20 N. SET TREE SOIAND PLACE ID WNDOP CN ONIXCOMPACTED BCKDLL BEWIHOLEIFULL OM 561Wc 50 MO CDEBR. TAMPSOL TO G MT AWAY STRING AND CROUP. B TOD0EMOVECWPIEIElY. BE CAR.NOT AMAO Rms BACK. RDIONING PURnxG HOLE uIARNE OF APPROVED TOPSOIL MO NAME SOL AMINO 'M TILL AS NOTED w LANDSCAPE NOTES. CONIFER - PROPERTY 1991' - TYPE 2 LANDSCAPING: SIDE -TREES : 1 PER EACH 20 IF EXCLUDING CURBCUIS (=9 TREES) -SHRUBS 1 PER EACH 5 LF, EXCLUDING CURB CUTS (=35 SHRUBS) GRWNDCOVER 5' LANDSCAPE BED • MULCH OMP AU. PUNTING BEDS III 8001 BNL q.WETER TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE, N.T.S. ROOT BALL MOO. FAT .00 STAKES. LOCATED 01.13E OF TRUNK. ST. 1.11.T MUST BE LEAST S. ROY NOSHED GRADE z' OF BARK Uw LCH SAUCER T TO IN M 2. Of ITO TRUNK. No PLANTING D. DIAMETER ON REMOVE CO BNNW GR PULL BACK TOP PORT. BURLAP NLAP MOM RCOTBALL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT W PLANTING PIT 1PQWA. NTH SOIL TO EDAM GRADE SCARFY SIDES CF PUN.. HOLE WOE SURE GOOD TANNAGE N. HAS MISTING NAME SOL PEALED -POMO SET .RUB STRAI.T AND PUCE ROOTEN1 . SOD anTAW SO Puxnxc H. L TO MAME POO.. 9WA.155 SOL 9NLr. NI/zAPPRO. TOPSOIL D 0 AS TTHENNsTALA1Dox NOTES. AMEND BAIXDLL S NOTED _�' EXISTING NATIVE S5L CONTAINER SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. r f EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED a STING TREE TO BE R EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVE0 SCREENING WALL ®p OO 48TH AVE. S. SIGN. tAg ha ECIDUOUS SET TREE STEN.T AND PLACE t011% BTOTTE BARK FILCH EDGE Of BED ROOT B.. PANED. / \ / \ °t ©-Q, SPA L STOICNRE MIAMPLAR PER omANCE .01111SPACING lONPUNT SOIED. GROUNDCOVER SPACING SCALE: FITS. LANDSCAPE NOTES GENERAL: .RI. :ANA PLANTING H. 12 2(918NATO IUM ROOTBALLw TER 9,2045206 Of AWAY AND BURLAL TO ARP. F x ORE BASKET REMOVE AND COMPLETELY. EUSgLCAREPUL NOT TO DAM. ROOM. (MCNEILL NOS O.RADA 112.EOE IOE N UN. TDPSOL NOBS. muLcH r DEEP ALL AREAS N9 GRADE • • UTILITY LOCATION: DETERMINE ALL ABOVE GRADE AND UNDERGROUND UOUIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED TO AVOID ANY DAMAGE. THIS 15 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. I. ALL EXISTING VEGETATION AREAS TO RECEIVE NEW LANDSCAPE SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED FROM THE SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF LANDSCAPE WORK 2. S9BGRAOE5 FOR ALL PLANING BED AREAS SHALL BE 6' MINIMUM BELOW FINISH ELEVATION. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE POSI0VE DRAINAGE. MINIMUM 3R. 3. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE NON -COMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 113' PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4. 1051WG CLAY OR SANDY SOILS SHALL BE AUGMENTED WITH ORGANIC SUPPLEMENTS. 50IL ANALYSIS MAY BE REQUIRED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE PLANTS AND GRASS FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR AFTER APPROVED COMPLE0ON. 6 IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY 116861 RMA DESIGN GROUP OF ANY ADVERSE CONDITIONS DR CONFLICTS WHICH MAY AFFECT HEALTH OF PLANT MATERIAL PLANTING BEDS: PLANING BEDS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 6' OF APPROVED THREE WAY TOPSOIL. 12" AT AREAS 891H TREES. DEPTH OF SOIL 15 DETERMINED AFTER SETTLING HAS 0202810. BEDS TO BE NONCOMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 1B . PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE MORE SOIL IF NECESSARY TO BE RUSH WITH CURB, SIDEWALK OR OTHER PAVED SURFACE. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE POSI0VE DRAINAGE. 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANT OUANI0ES AND SQUARE 100TAGE. 60100 1ERRAFORMA DESIGN CROUP IF THERE I5 A DISCREPANCY. 3 ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE WELL BRANCHED, FREE FROM DISEASE CR PEST. AND HAVE A WE1L DEVELOPED ROOT SYSTEM. ALL MATERIAL TO MEET AMERICAN AS0000710I2 OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. 4. FEROUZE ALL PLANT MATERIAL WITH SLOW RELEASE FERIZER PER MANUFACTURER'S RATES. 5. PLANT MATERIAL PLANTED TO BE SAME AS OR NO MORE THAN 1' HIGHER THAN CURRENT GROWTH RATE AT FINISH GRADE. 6. WATER PLANTS THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING AND WMEDIAIELY FOLLOWING. 780ER HEAVILY AT FIRST, 3 TIMES PER WEER. AND LESS ONCE ESTABUSHED. 7. ORGANIC MEDIUM 140166 TO BE A MINIMUM OF 2' DEPTH IN ALL PLANTING BEDS. 8. STAKES TO BE COMPLETELY REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO 1 YEAR. CHECK 20091 RL0 FOR DAMAGE OR ADJUSTMENTS NEEDED. 9. APPLY P821028CENT TO MULCH IN PLANTING BEDS. IF WEEDS OCCUR WITHIN I YEAR, LANDSCAPER SHALL RETURN TO REMOVE 'WEEDS AT NO COST. 10 REFER TO 881685ENS WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS AND CITY FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ANO INFORMATION. grit Pik GPOLAAMOVIBM ABOVE RON GR. 1 PRIOR TO SPREAD. Mua NOIEs o OUAPF I_ucesTwc 11.14f OR IOC .CED TOPSOL II .__ GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. NW 114 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKVO LNG COUNTY, WA GRASS: I. FOR S00 WATERING. FERIIULNG, AND MOWING, FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S IN000060065 2. INSTALL 500 (NO NET) PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 3, 4' MINIMUM TOPSOIL R0T0TL1ED TO DEPTH OF 6' WITH AMENDMENTS. RAKE AND ROLL. 4. PROTECT ADJACENT AREAS DURING ESTABLISHMENT. 5. ALL LAWN TO BE EDGED CLEANLY AND GRASS TO BE ONLY IN DESIGNATED AREAS. IRRIGATION: I. AN IRRIGA0ON PLAN WILL BE PROVIDED AFTER SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 2 IRRIGATION I5 TO CONFORM MTH CITY OF TACOMA STANDARDS OR ANY CODES AND CONFORM TO WALOREENS WRITTEN SPECIFICATION, 1. FOLLOW WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WIRE SIZE, HEAD TYPE, CONTROLLER, RAIN SENSOR, ETC. A SEPARATE IRRIGATION METER IS TO BE PROVIDED. CONTROLLER TO BE IN SPRINKLER RISER AREA. SITE CONSTRUCTION: I. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND LOCATE AND MING OR PROPOSED UIUMES. ANY DAMAGE DONE BY NOT LOCATING. 15 THE RESPONSIBNTY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 2. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND 1.111170 DESIGN. U1U0ES SHOWN ON DRAWING ARE 5CHEMA10 ONLY. 3. EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE PROMDED DURING CONSTRUCTION PER CIML PLANS. PLANT SCHEDULE TREES SYMBOL 56(69000 NAME COMMON NAME QUANTITY SIZE (AIN.) 5/30/14 VICINITY MAP I SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM IANOSCAPF ARCHITECT 109902ORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5027 515T AVENUE SW SEATTLE. WA 98136 CONTACT: ANEW SAKAIDA, LA PHONE: (206) 923-0590 EMAIL: 4kem i881 W 11nk.cam GOVERNING AGENCIES PLANNING CITY OF NKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD X100 TUKWILA. WA 98186 CONTACT: MINNIE DHALIWAL PHONE: (206) 431-3670 EMAIL: minnie.dhnliwal®Lukwilawa.gav SPACING (MAX.) NOTES 5TA1E OF WASRNCTOI REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARC4111104 aikm,ILS NLF16 RAE 5AKNDA CER1FICAIC N0. 794 EXPIRES 06/16/14 0 SHRUBS 501.1E101 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED CARPNUS BETULU5 TRANS FONTAINE' 8 2 ' CAL. (MIN.) FRAN5 FONTANE HORNBEAM MALU5 'RED BARRON' 13 2' CAL (MN.) RED BARRON CRABAPPLE THUJA PUCATA 'FASIICJATA' HOGAN CEDAR SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 5UANITY 6' TALL AS SHOWN 20' A5 560614 CONFIRM REMOVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE STUMP.RWTS AND All 015202 MATCHING FORM. SINGLE TRUNK. A1N. BRANCHING HOT. 5' MATCHING FORM, SINGLE TRUNK, MIN. BRANCH HEIGHT 5' SINGLE TRUNK, FULL SIZE (MIN.) SPACING (MAX.) NOTES 0 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM TALL OREGON GRAPE RHODODENDRON 'PJM' PJM RHODODENDRON eCOTONEASTER PARNE111 PARNEYII 601041AS1ER PINUS MUCRO MUGHO PINE RIBES SANGUINELITA FLOWERING CURRANT POTEN7LLA 'MANGO TANGO' MANGO TANGO C952111FOR OO VIBURNUM DA1DB DAVID'S VIBURNUM GROUNDCOVER SYMBOL O VIBURNUM TIRE SPRING BOUQUET VIBURNUM 5CIEN2FIC NAME COMMON NAME 18 2 GALLON A5 SHOWN FULL. MATCHING 15 5 GALLON AS SHOWN FULL. MATCHING 12 2 GALLON AS 06001 FULL. MATCHING B 2 GALLON A5 SHOWN FULL MATCHING 3 GALLON A5 SHOWN FULLMUL1-51121 6 2 GALLON AS SHOWN FULL.MULTI-STEM 32 2 GALLON AS SHOWN 4B 2 GALLON A5 SHOWN FULL MATCHING 5 GALLON, 3' TALL MIN. (AT UIUTY SHED) FULL 4027 BRANCHED N01E. - SHRUBS TO BE 18 TALL MINIMUM, INCREASE CONTAINER SIZE TO MEET REQUIREMENT. GRASS PERENNIAL RYE MIA HYDRO5EE0 160281UM CHAMAEORY5 GERMANDER YWCA MINOR, PFAIWINKLL QUANTITY 3100 SF 110 215 SIZE (MIN.) SPACING (MAX.) NOTES I GALLON I GALLON INSTALL PER MFG. RECOMMENDATIONS, NO NET 500 IF DURING WINTER SEASON 24 ' TRIANGULAR FULL, MULTI STEMMED, HEALTHY 24' TRIANGULAR FALL, BUSHY, 40211 -STEM NOTE: - CONTRACTOR TO VITRIFY OUAN0IY FOR GRCUNDCOVER. GROUNDCOVER NOT REWIRED IN TREE NEIILS OR UNDERNEATH SHRUBS. -0003 TDG NO. 13035 z 0 e 1 w RING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE TRUCK FUELING STATION III 09 13100 48th Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN 5 P,a)ed Number 2007833019 11e Nome Own. Chkd. 2342. YY,MM.D0 OR Drawing No. LI Revision Sheet 1 of 1 PETERSON TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48TH AVE S PL14-003 L14-0003 DR L14-0004 BLA E14-0001 S E PA L14-0004 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 1 ## --m3„=.,NOL:OL a__.d, _ a c f K J (\/ r,,. 11.1 § §4/ 210000 oM)DX-CaEDEa.-.10 0 :<43\ } APN 000300-0030 0 or § \� } 04, E (§ +�� : {!\ -2- ƒ� 1i /, . 2 i !'§ i _ K Y. " 21 1 1 O .I amawi e _o 9 \ b }) .• 0 «(2$ rƒ�■ MEMORANDUM To: Bob Giberson via David McPherson Chris Flores via Don Tomaso Richard Takechi, Finance Department From: Minnie Dhaliwal RE: Peterson BLA Date: July 23, 2014 File: L14-0004 The above referenced boundary line adjustment is ready for final approval. Attached are the documents for recording. Please indicate your approval by putting your initials next to your name below. If you do not approve, indicate any additional requirements below. Approved by Chris Florest C. (initials) Approved by Bob Giberson —&J(initials) Approved by Richard Takechi F-5-7 (initials) City of TukwiIa Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 6-mali: planning@tukwilaWA.gov BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L14-0004 DECLARATION KNOW All MEN 50 THESE. PRESENT THAT 445, THE UNDERSIGNED, O'NNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OE THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED 00 HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION 04 THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES 00 THE OWNER(S). IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SEI OUR HANDS AND SEALS. STRANGER FTMILY, LCI - BY: LOUISE H. STANDER MANAGING MEMBER VICINITY MAP APPROVALS TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIASION COMMITTEE APPROVAL REVIEWED AND APPRORED 40 THE SHORT SUBDIVSION COMMETTEE AND 4080140 CERTIFIED FOR FILING THIS DAT _ , 2014. CHAIRPERSON, SHORT SUBDDASION 409410195 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 00' OF "014 ENG COUNTY ASSESSOR 000300-0045 AND 000300-0113 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD 11445 DAY 00 2014 m 830K Al RASES ________ AT THE REQUEST OF SARGHAuSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. MANAGER SUPT. OF RECORDS ACKNOWLEDGMENT: S Al E. OF COUNTT OE SS. L CERTIFY THAT 1 KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORIT EVIDENCE THAT 1.0010,-,1 • 'TIRANE:FR IS 51e. E4P.S014 vo-10 APPEARED DEFORE ME, ADD SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGEO THAT SHE SIGNED THIS INSINLTMENT ON EAT. STATED SHE ;WAS 414EGR12E0 10 EXECUTE PIE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE MANIAC:NG mEmBER OF STPLANDER FAML • LT' 1. A ),A»07',5 ,4'41'43) TA44IL.10 COMPATH, TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT 04 SUCH PARTY FOR THE 90455 AND 4140P4147 mTi413A4,;1 DATED 11115 DAY OF TT5I40Y PUBLC, ItL,..A445 FOR THE STATE 1.10 WASHINGTON PRINTED LUTA" RESIDING Al ' L45 APPOINTMENT EXPPEES LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: THIS BOUNDARY LINE AD343534E40 CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A suRvEy I I MADE BY 141. OR UNDER 40 DIRECTION tri CONFORMANCE WiTH STATE 1 T, -0 /16 I er OWEN B. NILE, PIS DATE WASHINGTON REGISTRATION NO. 40015 AND COUNTY STATUTES IN J3E5 2014. RECEIVED JUL 23 2014 18215 72ND AVENUE KENT, WA 93032 (425)2.51-6222 (420)251-8782 FAX VOL PG. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: (PER CHICAGO 041.5 INSURANCE COMPANY '50300 N;-), 1357544, DATED 40)4044 22, IF01.3) PARCEL A: THAT 004110N or THL srEPHIN FOSTER 04'., LAND CLAIM NO 313, AND OF TNE CYRUS C LEWIS 10 1, LAND CLAIM 'a 37, SECTIONS 11, 14 AND 15 TOWNSHIP 23 NO314. RANGE 4 I50ST, 811.13,4ETTE MER:DEATE, 44: KiNo COUNTY WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS 0014.06: COMmENCINIG Al A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT TIEE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERE:NE. OF THE CIF! OF SEATTLE 1PA:NS44:1010N UNE SIGHT OF WAY. WIWI THE CENTERLINE OF 4801: AVENul 00000 AS RECCROED 1.190.30 AUDITORS 1944 NO, 6343595. RECORDS OF AINO COUNTY, WASHING I ON, THENCE NORTH 414535" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 270 00 FEET, THENCE SOLTTH 4014240 EAST 2500 FELT 10 THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 40171 AVENUE 45.504 AND THE POINT OF BECINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 48'14'25' EAST 144.90 05E1 TO THE NCTRTHWELSTERLY MARGIN OF PRImARY STATE HIGHWAY NT: 1, AS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPREATTON ITTI KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAUSE TTO 591370; THENCE NORTH 524636" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MMRCIN 2E43.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 461425' WEST 196.32 FEET 10 11-0 5A1D SOLITHE.45TERLY MARGIN 01 48114 AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 4045340 WEST ALONG SAID MARCIA 203.70 0117 TO THE POINT OF DEGINNINO. PARCEL 8: SEAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER 1150 1. LAND CLAIM Nl,. 38 IN SECTIONS AND 15, FOINNSTILP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, IN, M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, 0ESCE:1910 AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 4344'15' EAST A DISTANCE CF 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (4153) AT THE CNC OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER UNE OF 14E DUWAMISH-RENTON JUNCTION ROAD NON PAIR SAID CURVE BENG APPROXIMATELY 1,205 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST 00 04 QUARTER SECTON CORNER BETWEEN sAlo 551;2095 14 AND 151 THENCE NORTH 4036. LAST A DISTANCE 00 70303 PEET: THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 163 FEET, MORE 041 :505, TO A POTNI ON DIE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT -00-W MARGIN or PKIMAR( STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS SAO MARGIN WAS ESTABLISHED 00 JUDGMENT AND DECREE DF APPROPRTATION 1E1 KING COUNTY SUPERiOR COURT CAUSE NO. 591375: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTER:AMARGIN 10 0 0,7410 FROM 0411CH TILE PONT 110 5401013440 00AR5 NORTH 4924' 'wEST: IHENCE NORD-i 49'24' 1ES1 10 1HE POINI 00 BEGINNING. E4CEP1 ANY PORTON 1044111 CHIN 40)6 AVEN.11. SOUTH. PARCEL 0: 1H,41 PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FoSTER DCNADON CLAIM 10 SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNEILLIF 23 NORTH, RANCE 4 FAT, 49115544ETTE MERIDIAN, 0 4:0G COUNT,. INASHiNGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A YOINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 014415" EAST 0 DISTANCE 011 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUD) AT THE END OF 0 CURVE ON 1HE CENTER ;ETAT 00 THE 1:UWAMISH-11ENTO41 JUNCTION ROAD NOW PAVED. SAID 0:3114E: BEING APTIRUXMMEL, I.200 FEET NORTH ANL' 440 FEET WEST 0E THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER 13E1W1EN.'.3AID SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE SOUTH 4924 EAST 120.0 FEL 10 .4 POINT ON 090 NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT 00 WAY MARGIN OF PRNARY STATE HIGHWAY 00 1 AS SAID MARGIN WAS ESTABLISHED 434 3001391100 AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORNAMESTERLY MARGIN 'TO A POINT ON HEE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY mARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC PAiLWA'r COMPANY: THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 01001( 11,00 1071)''07101015.0MARGIN TO A 0000 ERN ;WHICIL THE POINT OF DEGIERLITTO BEARS NORTH 4030' EAST; THENCE NORTH 4E036' EAST 200 FEET 10: THE 904NT 00 BEGINNING; EXCLP1 ANY PORTION THEREOF TAKEN 004 PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NCT. 1 uNDER KVIG COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 413910: EXCEPT ANY 00950N THEREOF LYING 1011,15 48TH AVENUE AOUTH, NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: LOT A: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LANE. CLAIM NO 34,. BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 00 SECTION 14 AND NORTHEAST QuARTER 00 SECTION 15, RANGE 4 FAST, WILLAMETTE 41ERI91441. 410 KING COUNTY, INASHiNGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A FOUND 2' CONCRETE 1171E0 IRON PIPE WITH TACK MOTTUMENT CASE AT THE CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32' EAST, ALONG THE MONUMEINTED CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH. A DISTANCE 00 122.43 FEET ro THE CENTERLINE OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH: THENCE NORTH 41'45'43' EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RaiLWAY COMPANY; THENCE SOUTH 4013'32' EAST, ALONG SATO NORTHEASTERLY ILENE, A DESTANCE Of' 25.00 FECT 00 THE SOUTHEASTERLY 4114004 00 SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 41'05'43" EAST, ALONG SATE SOUTIELEA.STETELx MARGIN. A OISTANCE ()F 245.00 FEET TO THE ?CAST OE BEGINNING; THENCE COETTNUING NORTH 414543T EAST 1, DISTANCE OF 233.)0'; • '111 0(1 5000), 48'1411" EAST A DISTANCE DIT 196.32 FEET 10 THE NORTHWESTFTRLY MARGIN OF PRIETARY STATE HiGHWAY NO. 1 AS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPPLATTON A KING c03030 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTH 524644T WEST. ALONG 01.11) NORTHWESTERLY 14AR01Ii. A (15744071 00 243,13 FEET TO A POINT WHICH HEARS SOUTH 4E01417" EAST FROM THE POINT 00 BEGINNTNO; THENCE NORTH 4811417T WEST A DISTANCE LIF 149.130 FEET TO 71,1. 90411 OF BEGiNNINC. LOT a THAT PORTION OE THE STEPHEN FOSTER 3034.1:09 LAND CLAW NO 30. BONG A PORTION 0014-44 NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AND NORTHEAST 00A.RTER 0070:00 15, TOWNSEITP 23113904, RANCE 4 0001, WILLAMETTE MERTDIAN, Mi KING COONFE, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A 050119 2' CONCRETE FILLED IRON 2100 0004 TACK IN moNuMENT CASE Al THE CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOO1H: THENCE SOUTH 44013'32' EAST. ALONG THE MONUMENTECT CENTERLINE 0" INTE,RURBAN A5EN101 SOUTH, A OISTANCE 00- 122.43 FEET TO THLT CENTERLINE OF 4849 AVENUE 5012131; THENCE NORIN 41'4543' EAST, ALONC SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF '30.00 FEB TO 1111 NORTTIEASTERLY RIGHT -OF -19A0 UNE OF THE PUGET S05140 ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY: THENCE SOUTH 481332' EAST, ALONG SATO NORTHEASTERLY UNE, A DISTANCE CTE ;5.00 00E5 TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MATRON OF SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE POINT' 00 BEGINTTINGT THENCE 004111 4045'43- EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY AT:ARGOT, A OISTANCE OF 245.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 461417" EAST, A DISTANCE: Of 149.35 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIT.EARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE CT APPROPR!ADON IN KING COUNI, SUPERIOR C0UR1 CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTH 524444" WEST, AIONO SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE 00 249453 FEET TO SATO NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY: THENCE NORTH 481332" 'NEST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE„A DISTANCE OTT 102.14 FEET 00 THE POINT OF BEGINNAG, I DRAwKNIETAElY 1 t( I SOUTH 04-01-15/8/2014 1 NE1/4 & SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC, 15, ISTIFF1: I I I 11' SC E . BYL 1 N/A d E AND NW1/4 8, SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SEC. 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANG4 EAST, W.M. I I c.N0,9:6 8 CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 308 1 T CML ENUNEE6,00, LAND PLANNING, ,URVEYING, EWRONMENTAL SERVCES 21150111, d I City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planningAtukwilaWA.gpv BOUNDARY EYE ADJUSTMENT NO, L14-0004 PILE NOTES: 4. E0SEMENI ANO TOE TE8305 001E0 CDNEATIO433 THEREOF: PORPDSE04.00,500.0. litfeka. ACCESS EORESS RECOR860C3 NUMBERS. 11..,6334;. 3715306, 3'22532, 249±937.5.850282 A50 07HE5 19STRUME9TS OF RECORD 2. EAE/4E/.T AND THE TERMS AND CONOITIONS THERECIT GRANTEE; Cl' Or 11:10.43L0, A 341.390:10.01. C09500A23033 PuR405E0 CONSTRUClION, GPERATION, 46/515904/55 5137/36 REPAIR AN3D/0R REPtACEMENT OF A SEWER 1.134E OR LINES AND ,4008RTE554CE5 11158E.50. TJGENHER 4331 THE 00403 OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA AFFECTED: PDF,TIOTI FAREEL El A.00 MEHER PROPERTY LYING w14113.3 A STRIP OF LAND 20 31.36 10 (MIS RECORDED: .1441A14Y E, 11/54 RECORDING talmetx: 065.36133 3. C003DE100301000. ACCESS 03 64.430 HICHWAy .44D CF LICH3, 9013 4313 AIF': El 9340 COUNT( 055015 10 THE SIATE OF WASKsttst, E4TERE8: JUNE 25, 10E3 51.1PER300 CO11R1 CAUSE NOmBER: 591370 4, COZE3.0451300 3! ACCESS Te STAPE RI:P:140Y NUMBER: AND 01 1531•11, viE4 AND AIR 8'e 443".4 50:040313: DECRSt.L. 35 '015 /514/4 (33' Y7SIILS/5 ENTERED,. po'sial!R 2-.1(454 'CuPERTOR.COugT 8011.S1 0434BER3 37313910 3. t.1713!EDA79ME41 DIE4.30541 133 ifILE 50130 .041LU MAT 130, 5005 or Ash413.0 PRANG 50109 PARCEL A 8953:CACHE5 1 FOCI, 02)0! OR LESS, SOLGH OF THE NORTH 08E. of P858EI. 8. 5-13. 4.,3 APPLiCARIE IC' RS SHOWN 04 03.160E5. 11. 005E53 AGREE:MEW, AND THE 051445 AND C66O3111055 ilLEREOF• - 8LIKEEJ105140110 5. lE1E51.00 AND 950904.0. 8. PETERSON. HUS4„0.31D ANL, 0,90E SUB5R01452oR, C0;4050 PRILLFS f:91.eA4o. 501190044. E03oPORA(338, SUCCESSOR 05 MERCFR 10 '359SE0 GORP3RAT104, 0 NE5650 COPPORAIION RECORDED: 0•3031.334 14, 20000, 45(00 5(146 3414181 2510800 40031134 15-24, NOT APP1.1/0.0LE TO RE SHOWN ON SVP.0:Ei. .,/ / 7 14.E) 5/0' REBAR/CAST.03.1ACR-....___ pE• • ,,// / 11014 154434/047.0, 723.32' 4' 1/EE60A80 2 ' 013) .47' 51 ',room) 41058015' '4 CASE „/„' / / \!'„,14- 5 0045. [/13)4'2" HiPE 10/1ACR 3511RERAN 60. 1.;-. ([4 0211060 '034 '.71"BC; 4)01E: / ,/ 111113111=0.1D. -,P1111.4)94081.40.. N1011•11110•MIN. :,•:T3033,..03:03" 34 CASE ".. 360°30 X.:LK 2,0"); •:0•44, C... OF 48TH AVE 5 / / (1014.1363 2013) • '''''s4A.'i?/4. .1. *ALmi • • ;, 4/- ' ' 110.8r 4001CC-: ;;',q:''• s4k, • S./. 55( / „V" `5;/'4C).- 44 00);_, / • %'; /114/ /. • • 7/.4").`, / / N • / Cks STRUCTURE E03:33.03 70 BE REMOVED A N 000305-65030 . • • / / R I/ --k • !!:-"!.;!! 5E7 f(EBAR 'SCE 41036' • . rowiS, tW) TACN-..„ / • (FE60L303Ri 2(13) E00145 RE65.R/050 & TACR . 0;8E18.5 TRH LS2E434 /18723/22333' (5E865,04Y 2013) 7." P.F..17,'CF(.1 7. N F'34 TIETE3:44.03"3- 004 0 • -AA A,7"! 30, sck.> N••••:51.f..„ <or 14 r! 4 • 10•._ er, J.“64-...11‘1,, r • . LOT B , • , At / • ' , .2Z3,.... 341STINO ' ,, ,i0/,•,..' ....-•(;''4, . ‘F `- ‘-,', / Li. ! 51'31510'i I/ '../9,9... 4) "'0. ' ' '/ , ' 15 D3E R/111311/./ ' \ 44,,,L• ;'R'-'• • V ,__;,.', M• Co ' / \ ' ,' •4 ,0 • 0 . * - '''-0% ' " 1'T' / • ',.. / a ,,,, • .. , -\ f-, - '.•Y -- N ' ? \„- -L .........\ ,-,-. •>/ ..''./- -'stc.,' ,•,E!'V' A ". - t 4, • /,/ N..,, PR / //7/ / ,\-z.,.),>-.4,t„, ,. / /\ •s, f? 004,30, / J. ,,,'," • A / / • , 0'11 I / Apil 000300-0037 ... • ' / / ;',<'' 4- .../ ' "xy.,‘• •-3',.4'.. LS- ••\_. '''(40 1.4%, •• 'IP\ 0.1 "--"RFBAR P , •• • ,ET ' 119(4. c;,•• , • 4001C 0-11ORTHEASTERLY 610441-0E-W41 PUGET sour* ETECTRIC RAXWAv 0504'9N, FOUND MONUMENT 19 CASE 13±535 1/310 39 4'44" (4.05 0053 RC( INTERURBAN AVE 4 52310/5616 AtE S. (F(BRCARN 2013) ,410 LOT A ,xc,Z‘c?e R1 E78'AR cf? .9SE 4004)4 ;1' 4 \ 70,2077.7, ffeEMINICESS.SSIMOSIMII63 GH ik ‘4• 4440* o•. )44C ENG314 RECEIVED `JUL 23 2014 , DEVELOPMENT 15.535 7290 AVEGOE SOUTm KEN.% WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8702 FAX 3a49. E43144(04.11. LAM) P1/64,96, 50.00.417041. EN0PEN95914T 5E9MCE5, • -40i, -• c34), . • "T .:" ,/ 0 20 40 M;FRAW6wwitipati SCALE: 14.40' GRAN BY .9,35 DATE 0s/3„T/2014 REBA,: & CAP 47040 001(' 6/55:0 EEARINGS: NA0 83/51 SOUTH 4,4T3f.157" 4A51, AS MEASURED 6I:TWE59 4e,,•5 WM.:M.44AL, 504108ot pocts 93H-902 ?ST 63.,i-964, VOL PG. DATES OF SURVEY: Fir.LD 51.14/EY 80 8034TH01.3.55,4 CONS1/541033:3 E11G33Ei.03, INC CUNiAJCILD IN 3E9RUAR0, 2013, ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS FOUND WERE 1451150 13141 WE, REFERENCE SURVEYS 1. R.O.S.. F.:Zt7'.. NO. 7.092.50425 5.0.5.. kET.;_ NO. 2202035010. 0.9 035 fiQ 84105082003 4 01.30/4C90 SURvEY BY BUSH, RUED 40 34145317300.3. DAlte I-30-58 5. 0(15 49-80i.1 vAlll BY JOHN E. EVANS AND AssoCIATES, NATO 3.-11-90 • EXISTING SOT AREAS: 0019341. 45.3301 S.i . 42.9(8) 191,541 8: 27.180! (0,521 ACTH:5) 00104. Lor A8)::., 72,180 E.,f (/60/ 0:9(5) NEW LOT AREAS: 85IX41.. A: 41,9151 S.F. (9632. ACRES) PARCEL a 30,8714 SS ((.73± .63941) 101±4. LOT 0."43:14 72,19631/. Aci-Iss) PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE A 5350 1345E60E t51015 4T3 .9.E 5i3 00 AND LiCA TC1103 11104.1(0±5112 1911± FIELD 1,00±1. ,W AG 113)0RmEG, E51013S3905 15E ANGULAR5547 01515,55 REL,norisHiPs 01.5055 THE m5N30E,,,S, PROERT11111 AND 41 3,C\306613 TEL 3610 REDS OR EXCEEDS THE 5101400000DS FUR .410 Botor;5( SURVEYS AS sr 1553± 94 ±65 1;12 MT -010. LEGEND 0101E: NO1 ALL 37M80455 010" APPEAR DR THE 44.15/ 4534144T6E (LULL) (:,4'00-0 YARD: 1it310 05 P1130E0 ME'ER POYVER FEU ▪ JUNCTION 30v (AS N0100) • TELEPIRTNE 30445310145 o CMOS BASIN ((0) SIC1/4(3 30.093)019 (SONIII) O 0044;L400 5,004ER 1644HOLE 0:SSm34) 51:E4N3UT (AS N(4E0) • CASi :MLR GAS VAEVE ) Mak VALVE (WA') A A FWD H1OF:4241(F11)A70N7ECTION(FO() 58 450191 m.AN..ioLE ▪ rYATER MEIER 010)'.1-07E/5I13.'65 SICA, 34.73512110N61. 54100)3/ • 500,17.7' 90S:15M:0131 (AS 3/0(4.5) 3051315.1130.020, 4 4.334.3 0E331011 CORNER (AS NOT(D) CI 5011148; 1.8/0/14(0 113/ 82.18VEY CONIROL 5151101. HANDICAP ,A1/5413 SPXE 7.3.A0ING 11114 :4-' CHAT: 1/4.17 V4.1,175 - //---- W51:10 FENCE FT499EO WRRE FENCE -0 ITOCRAIRE FENCE --.41 WATER LINE G 0A3 LITE - ovERHEAO/UNDERCROVND TEL 1(6/. - - PViP. LINE ---19- - 5517000%15 IS SCA 8./: 1168 00.54055R 14518. NE1/4 & SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC. 15, AND NW1/4 & SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SEC. 14, 'TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 6011•••• 41 C") 75 1/ 13 1.5 154. 31.1 3. .6. rearasas, 11 ;` OF SHEET 2 Minnie Dhaliwal From: Nelson, Carl <Carl.Nelson@stantec.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:23 AM To: Minnie Dhaliwal Cc: Steven Peterson Subject: Setbacks - Petterson 76 Minnie, Please see email between Brandon Miles and Steve Peterson in regards to the setback along 48th. We moved forward with the current design based on this information. Carl Nelson Cell: (206) 920-5636 Stantec Design with community in mind stantec.com 0 0 t215 • The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. iCt Please consider the environment before printing this email, From: Steven Peterson [mailto:steve@xmrinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:19 AM To: Nelson, Carl Subject: RE: Utility Shed "Brandon Miles" <Brandon.Miles@TukwilaWA.gov> To: "steve@xmrinc.com" <steve@xmrinc.com> Cc: Sent: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:18:10 +0000 Subject: 1 Gas Station Follow Up Hi Steve - Thanks for meeting with me on Friday to discuss your project. I looked into the various issues regarding your proposed redevelopment and I think the City can work with the following setbacks: 1. 25 feet in the front, with the front being Interurban Ave South. Please note that the setback will be measured from your property line with SCL, not from the ROW of Interurban Ave South; 2. 12.5 feet from 48th Ave South, we will consider this to be a 2nd front; and 3. Five feet from the old Denney's Property and from the adjacent off -ramp. These setbacks are consistent with the plan you actually provided me. The plan sheet was approved by the City in 1996, which would have been under our current zoning code. It looks like at that time the City considered 48th Ave South to be a 2nd front, not a primary front. Some items to keep in mind as you start working on site planning: 1. You will need to have 12.5 feet of landscaping on the both the primary front (Interurban) and from the 2nd front (48th Ave S). Five feet of landscaping will be required along the Denny's property line and along the off ramp; 2. The project will be subject to administrative design review; and 3. Since the project triggers design review, the non -conforming sign along Interurban Ave South will need to be replaced with a conforming monument sign. I will be out of the office until Thursday. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. My direct phone number is listed below. Best Regards, Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner City of Tukwila 2 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 117 / Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3684 Thanks Steven Peterson 425-222-0030 www.xmrinc.com www.facebook.com/xtrememotorworks http://www.youtube.com/user/petersonsink Original Message From: "Nelson Carl" <Carl.Nelson@stantec.com> To: "Steven Peterson" <steve@xmrinc.com> Cc: Sent: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:07:17 -0600 Subject: RE: Utility Shed Steven, I did speak with Bestworth yesterday and he emailed me the plans. For us to move forward we need to clear up the issue with the shed. I understand that there may have been conversations between you and Duncan that I am not privy to. Unfortunately none of my conversations with Duncan as well as the contract that is in place give any mention to a utility shed. The contract excludes structural engineering services and approx. 60% of the $3500 fee I quoted is for the structural design of the shed. I did speak with my manager in depth about this and because we don't have enough budget left to add additional work to it we will need approval of the additional fee request to keep the ball rolling. I know this is not what you were looking for but I was able to get him to approve a minor reduction in the fee to $3250. If this is acceptable I will get on the schedule for our structural team to get plans moving and provide you with a schedule for when we can be ready for building permit submittal. I am headed out for the day and driving down to Portland for some meetings in the morning so if you want to give me a call than to discuss further while I am on the road please do not hesitate to do so. 3 Carl Nelson Cell: (206) 920-5636 Design with community in mind stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. ct Please consider the environment before printing this email, From: Steven Peterson [mailto:steve@xmrinc.com] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 5:18 PM To: Nelson, Carl Subject: RE: Utility Shed Did you receive the engineering for the canopy from bestworth? where is our timeline at now? Thanks Steven Peterson 425-222-0030 www.xmrinc.com www.facebook.com/xtrememoto rworks http://www.youtube.com/user/Detersonsink Original Message From: "Nelson Carl" <Carl.Nelson@stantec.com> 4 To: "Steven Peterson" <steve@xmrinc.com> Cc: Sent: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:57:27 -0600 Subject: RE: Utility Shed Steve, I am sorry that you are frustrated. I will get with management and discuss and get back to you. Thanks Carl Nelson Cell: (206) 920-5636 Design with community in mind stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modifiec, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately, Et Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Steven Peterson [mailto:steve@xmrinc.com] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:47 AM 5 To: Nelson, Carl Subject: Re: Utility Shed Carl, 0 I'm not very happy with this whole situation. You guys were supposed to drill three holes for the amount that I sign the paper for and then you only drill 2 holes and charge me for 3. I have to point this out and you give me a small amount off for a 1/3rd of the work. Second is I hired Duncan to be the architect because he has been in this field for quite some time and it would have sped up the process, saying he could be to the city in 3-4 weeks. Duncan resigned which is not your fault but it does not change the fact that this process hasn't been the smoothest. When Duncan and i met down here for the first time to discuss the project one of my questions and concerns was over the power for the projects do we run the power from here or do we have a whole separate power for over there. He said the best solution for the power needs would be a separate service because we were going to be doing phase 2 of the project down the road and this way we'd be able to operate the diesel while the store is being built. Can you go over this with your manager so we can come up with a better solution then paying more for something that was agreed upon. Thanks Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID "Nelson, Carl" <CarlNelson@stantec.com> wrote: Hi Steve, Sorry it took me a while to get this over to you as I have been travelling a bit lately In reviewing Duncan's old notes and the proposal for this project as well as all the preliminary plans that were prepared by both us as well as the previous architect Barghausens plans I don't find any information on the utility building nor is it shown in our proposal. We will now prepare plans to include proposal for this 8'X16 building which will include permitting the building; Structural plans Modify Grading and landscape plans Electrical Plans Provide heating system that will prevent freeze 6 • Exterior Elevations e) Work with city to include in planning / design review application that is already in progress Fees to include the utility building will be $3500. Please let me know if this is acceptable and I will get an official change order over to you to sign and we can finish this portion up. Thanks Carl Nelson Stantec Architecture 1932 1st Avenue # 307 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 770-3839 Cell: (206) 920-5636 carl.nelson@stantec.com Design with community in mind stantec.com The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. CO Please consider the environment before printing this email. 7 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@dtukwilaWA.gov BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. DECLARATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(S), IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. STRANDER FAMILY, LLC I BY: LOUISE H. STANDER MANAGING MEMBER APPROVALS TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE AND HEREBY CERTIFIED FOR FILING THIS DAY OF 2014. CHAIRPERSON, SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS , DAY OF 2014. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR 000300-0045 AND 000300-0113 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS ACKNOWLEDGMENT: STATE OF COUNTY OF SS. I I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT LOUISE H. STRANDER 15 THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT, ON OATH STATED SHE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE MANAGING MEMBER OF STRANDER FAMILY, LLC I, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS DAY OF , 2014. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PRINTED NAME RESIDING AT MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 2014 AT M IN BOOK OF AT PAGES ___ AT THE REQUEST OF BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. MANAGER SUPT. OF RECORDS LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: THIS BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY STATUTES IN JANUARY 2014. &L L(, (74 4- OWEN B. HILLE, PLS DATE WASHINGTON REGISTRATION NO. 40016 Notary Scol (j1[- 0004 RECEIVED FEB 10 2014 TUK`NILi PUBLIC WORKS DECEIVED JAN ) 2914 OLVLWI 'MLA I GHq&111V4.s 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH �Z KENT WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX TV, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING. SURVEYING. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES VOL. PG. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: (PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO.: 1357644, DATED MARCH 22, 2013) PARCEL. A: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, AND OF THE CYRUS C LEWIS DONAHON LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SECTIONS 11, 14 AND 15 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT OF WAY, WITH THE CENTERLINE OF 48111 AVENUE SOUTH AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE N0. 6313596. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 41'45'35" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 270 00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 4614'25° EAST 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLYJMRGIN QF SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 4814'25' EAST 144.98 -FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 1, AS ESTABLISHED BY JUOGMENI`AND'DECREE OF APPROPRIATION TN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAUSE NO 591370; THENCE NORTH 52'46:36: EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY'MARGIN 268.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4814'25" WEST 196.32 FEET TO THE SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 41'45'35" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 263.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 38 IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81'44'15° EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET" FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE DUWAMISH-RENTON JUNCTION ROAD NOW PAVED, SAID CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF 111E QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN 0410 SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 200,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST A DISTANCE OF 163 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS SAID MARGIN WAS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE N0. 591370; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 49'24' WEST; THENCE NORTH 4624' WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN 48TH AVENUE SOUTH. PARCEL 0: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81'44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE DUWAMISH-RENTON JUNCTION ROAD NOW PAVED, SAID CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST 120.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS SAID MARGIN WAS ESTABUSHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 40'36' EAST; THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST 20.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF TAKEN FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 613910; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN 48TH AVENUE SOUTH. NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: LOT A: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AND NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A FOUND 2' CONCRETE FILLED IRON PIPE WITH TACK IN MONUMENT CASE AT THE CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32' EAST, ALONG THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE" OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 122.43 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 41'45'43" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 41'45'43" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 245.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 41'45'43" EAST A DISTANCE OF 238.70'; THENCE SOUTH 48'14'17" EAST A DISTANCE OF 196,32 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY N0. 1 AS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTH 52'46'44" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 243.18 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 48'14'17" EAST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 4614'17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT B: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AND NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A FOUND 2' CONCRETE FILLED IRON PIPE WITH TACK IN MONUMENT CASE AT THE CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 4613'32" EAST, ALONG THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 122.43 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 41'45'43' EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 481H AVENUE SOUTH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 41'45'43° EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 245.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4614'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 149.85 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTH 52'4644" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 249.63 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE NORTH 4613'32" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 102.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DRAWN 8Y KMA DATE 01/8/2014 SCALE: N/A HECKED OBH 8Y JOB NO.: 16066 NEI/4 & SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC. 15, AND NW1/4 & SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SEC. 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON File: P:\16000s\16066\survey\ plats\1606661a01.dwg Date/Time:1/29/2014 9:36 AM ScaIe:1" = 1' OHILLE Xref: ---- F SHEET 1 OF City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@tukwilaWA.gov BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. TITLE NOTES: 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: ROADWAY, HIGHWAY, ACCESS, EGRESS RECORDING NUMBERS: 1661137, 1715306, 1722502, 2496937,5850282 AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF TUKWILA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE: CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND/OR REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF A SEWER LINE OR UNES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF PARCEL B AND OTHER PROPERTY LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 1964 RECORDING NUMBER: 5683681 3. CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR BY KING COUNTY DECREE TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: ENTERED: JUNE 25, 1963 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER: 591370 4. CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1 AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR BY KING COUNTY DECREE TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: ENTERED: NOVEMBER 2, 1964 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER: 613910 5. ENCROACHMENT DISCLOSED 8Y TITLE POLICY DATED MAY 10, 1989: EDGE OF ASPHALT PAVING FROM PARCEL A ENCROACHES 1 FOOT, MORE OR LESS, SOUTH OF THE NORTH UNE OF PARCEL 8. 6-13. NOT APPLICABLE TO 8E SHOWN ON SURVEY. 14. ACCESS AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: STANLEY H. PETERSON AND REBECCA R. PETERSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE SUBORDINATOR: CONOCO PHILLIPS COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO TOSCO CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION RECORDED: AUGUST 14, 2008 RECORDING NUMBER: 20080814000724 15-24. NOT APPLICABLE TO 8E SHOWN ON SURVEY. FND 5/8° REBAR/CAP&TACK "BRH LS#6434/18723/22333" (FEBRUARY 2013) FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE CONC. FILLED 2" PIPE W/TACK (FEBRUARY 2013) "4, N 450 SET REBAR & CAP °BCE 40016" FOUND LEAD & TACK (FEBRUARY 2013) FOUND REBAR/CAP & TACK LABELED "BREI LS#6434 /18723/22333" (FEBRUARY 2013) • FOUND TACK & WASHER (FEBRUARY 2013) FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE 2" BRASS DISK 2/"X" CL OF 48TH AVE S (FEBRUARY 2013) / 00 ;S / REBAR & CAP "BCE 40016" APt1 0C)0300.-00&0 F'ARCL`.I. A APN 000300-0045 // PARCEL B & C APN 000300 -0 1 I3 SET REBAR & CAP "BCE 40016" 0 / / .{PN 000 300- 00 32 .6'4 ts FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE BRASS PIN IN 4"X4” CONC POST INTX INTERURBAN AVE & 52ND/56TH AVE S. (FEBRUARY 2013) SET REBAR & CAP \CE 40016" NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY BLDG COR. 1.2' NW OF PROP. UNE 42. vt_46 44. 6. (NG ENGPNt4. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PUNNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0 20 40 80 DRAWN BY KMA DATE 01/8/2014 SCALE: 1" 40' CHECKED BY: O8H SCALE: 1"s4O' REBAR & CAP "BCE 40016" VOL. PG. DATES OF SURVEY: FIELD SURVEY BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CONDUCTED IN FEBRUARY, 2013. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS FOUND WERE VISITED AT THAT TIME. REFERENCE SURVEYS: 1. R.O.S., REC. N0. 7409230426 2. R.0.0., REC. N0. 8202039010 3. R.0.0., REC. N0. 9803099003 4. ALTA/ACSM SURVEY BY BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC., DATED 1-30-89 5. SITE AS -BUILT MAP BY JOHN E. EWING AND ASSOCIATES, DATED 3-11-80 EXISTING LOT AREAS: PARCEL A- 45,000± S.F. (1.03± ACRES) PARCEL 6: 27,186± S.F. (0.62± ACRES) TOTAL LOT AREA: 72,186 S.F. (1.66± ACRES) NEW LOT AREAS: PARCEL A: 41,315± S.F. (0.95± ACRES) PARCEL 8: 30,871± S.F. (0.71± ACRES) TOTAL LOT AREA: 72,186 S.F. (I.66± ACRES) PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE: A FIELD TRAVERSE USING A TRIMBLE 5800 AND A LEICA TCR703 SUPPLEMENTED WITH FIELD NOTES, WAS PERFORMED, ESTABUSHING THE ANGULAR, AND DISTANCE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS, PROPERTY LINES AND IMPROVEMENTS. THE RESULTING DATA MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS FOR LAND BOUNDARY SURVEYS AS SET FORTH IN WAC 332-130-090. BASIS OF BEARINGS: NAD 83/91 SOUTH 88'35"57" EAST, AS MEASURED BEPWEEN WGS HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 93H-902 AND 93H-901. LEGEND (NOTE: NOT ALL SYMBOLS MAY APPEAR ON THE MAP) g-❑ O 0 O 0 - W - -G- -T(XX)- -770)- - SD - - SS - LUMINAIRE (109.) YARD UGHT POWER METER POWER POLE JUNCTION BOX (A5 NOTED) TELEPHONE MANHOLE CATCH BASIN (CB) STORM MANHOLE (5DM11) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) CLEANOUT (AS NOTED) GAS METER GAS VALVE WATER VALVE (VN) FIRE HYDRANT(FH)/CONNECTION(FDC) WATER MANHOLE WATER METER BLOW-OFF/ARVAC SIGN MONITOR WELL DIRECTIONAL ARROW SURVEY MONUMENT (AS NOTED) BENCHMARK SECTION CORNER (AS NOTED) FOUND LEAD/TACK SURVEY CONTROL STATION HANDICAP PARKING SPACE BUILDING UNE CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BARBED WIRE FENCE HOGWIRE FENCE WATER LINE GAS UNE OVERHEAD/UNDERGROUND TEL. LINE OVERHEAR/UNDERGROUND PWR. LINE STORM UNE SEWER LINE JOB NO.: 16066 NE1/4 & SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC. 15, AND NW1/4 & SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SEC. 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 0 In `ted rn 18 0 CP cx, 0 0 i 0 0 eialeurgN SHEET 2 OF CITY OF TUKh.LA Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 IF i ! E D Tukwila, WA 98188 REG http://www.TukwilaWA.gov 9AN 2$ 2014 (;",.L UI'Mhat t,)LVL-L TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. **Please Print** •ermit< Pf6jectNo: Y . Date Applicatlon'Accepted: 62:7/....56-2// 9 r ri Date Applicatton Ekpires: 0 30 1 . (For office use only) ,. _ SITE LOCATION Site Address: 131 oO 4£3ulcL King Co. Assessor's Tax No.: 000 3 OOcX)15 Suite Number: Tenant Name: ?*t2n l cK F3 Jt PROPERTY OWNER Name: -1-Ck(l�£.( �.J, Re -be ccc ki -e,yo M Address: i 33 ( 0 4vkkt1 Lli-bailrk aA.16 sSo City rI CLI) i uk_ Stat(A) ZigiBl(08 CONTACT PERSON — person receiving all project communication Name: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Type of Existing Use: Is existing building vacant? Type of work: ❑ New Type of Proposed Use: \ €5 ❑ Addition ca Change of use Size of Existing Use: For how long? ❑ Remodel Size of Proposed Use: ❑ Tenant Improvement PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES Expiration — The concurrency test notice shall expire 90 days after issuance unless the applicant submits a SEPA or other documentation pursuant to TMC 21.04. If the submittal is made within 90 days, the test notice shall be valid for one calendar year from the date of issuance of the notice. Once the associated development permit or building permit is approved, the final concurrency certificate shall be valid for 2 years or as long as the developer possesses a valid building permit for the development. Extensions may be granted in accordance with TMC 9.50. Transferability — A certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land, but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. A certificate of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land use, density, and intensity described in the application for a development permit or building permit. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE V D AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LA ' S O THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. PROPERTY OWNER OR.AUTHOR ZE ! AGENT: Signature: Print Name: Mailing Address: Date: (•- P � Day Telephone: e9O6 4133 cL`"(, c( -33( 0 il—t/.-4-troc bit k,� T 1;. (t{ e.A. CON Ce (6R City State Zip H:\Applications\Forms-Applications On Line\2012 Applications\Traffic Concurrency Application 2-9-12.docx bh Page 1 of 2 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. RECEIVED The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the Ci�a)2r i a4k additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. COMMUNI I Y DEVELOPMENT City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: ti 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 1 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). 1 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". 1 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule online. ✓ 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 1 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: ✓ 7. If the project requires SEPA review: Payment of a $365 notice board fee to Fast Signs Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). Mailed notice is not required. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: le8. tik Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). X11 9. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. 1 10. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application) ✓ 11. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.doc March 24, 2011 V Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning SITE PLAN: ✓ 12 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". 1 (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. 1 (c) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. 1 (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. (f) Loading and service areas. (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors and materials. (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50%). (k) Show all existing and proposed easements. ✓ (1) Vicinity Map with site location does not have to be to scale. LANDSCAPE PLAN: 13 (a) If the landscaping will be altered or the existing landscaping does not meet current standards (TMC 18.52) provide a landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36". ✓ (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN (If the project will affect any sensitive areas): 14 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20%, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36". (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. (d) Existing and proposed building footprints. H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review-Adnunistrative-Jan2011.doc March 24, 2011 Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning CIVIL PLANS (If utility or site work is proposed): ✓ 15 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36". ✓ (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. 1 (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. 1 (d) Total expected cut and fill. (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to http://www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwpermit.html. ✓ (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. 1 (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. 1 (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. 1 (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: ✓ 16. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. Maximum size 24" x 36". 17. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. 18. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is suggested. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). 19. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting if any changes to the existing fixtures are proposed. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. HALand Use Applications in PDF1Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.doc March 24, 2011 RECEfVEDD JAN 30 2014 CITY OF TUKWILA COM„,,I,„ Y BOUNDARY LINE Department of Community DevedkideittENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 ADJUSTMENT / LOT Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX• (206) 431-3665 E-n:ail: plannink a TukwilaWA.gov CONSOLIDATION APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Tvpe: P-BLA/LC Planner: File Number: Z_ / % _ Unta t/ Application Complete Date: Project File Number: '7( fe f_ 6/).-).c3 Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: L . . 640,2.1 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Peterson o LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 13310 Interurban Avenue South and adjoining Cot to the north. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 000300-0113 (Parce(B) and 00300-0045 (ParcelA) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Caryl J. Pinner, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Address: 18215 72nd Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: (425) 656.1063 E-mail: cpinner@barghausen.com FAX: (425) 251-8782 Signature: Date: January 2, 2014 H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\Boundary Linc Adjustment -Lot Consolidation-Jan2011.doc City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@tukwilaWA.gov BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. DECLARATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNER(S) IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(S). IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. T8T15ER i LT17 LIEN: LOUISE H. STANDER MANAGING MEMBER "u SITE c�PGP "tk ALF S VICINITY MAP APPROVALS TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE AND HEREBY CERTIFIED FOR FILING THIS DAY OF 2014. CHAIRPERSON, SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF 2014. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR 000300-0045 AND 000300-0113 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS ____ DAY OF , 2014 AT _______ M IN BOOK OF AT PAGES _ AT THE REQUEST OF BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 4 MANAGER SUPT. OF RECORDS ACKNOWLEDGMENT: STATE OF 4Jp H/✓67 ' ss. COUNTY OF J`"//✓G I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT LOUISE H. STRANDER IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT, ON OATH STATED SHE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE MANAGING MEMBER OF STRANDER FAMILY, LLC I, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THE INSTRUMENT. DATED THIS 2 770 DAY OF A /4/11,1- A=•' y" 2014. NOTARYHINGTCN PRINTF NAME /G /tt Civ- ���'C'f'7✓f'z%�. RESIDING AT a� MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 2 .. / / - / 7 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: THIS BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WFTH STATE AND COUNTY STATUTES IN JANUARY 2014. OWEN B. HILLE, PLS WASHINGTON REGISTRATION NO. 40016 (Zifzo14 ATE H ) ,o```:Y1111t 46.11/ 011. ifl 55 s �i,)IJefar Medi ` $ i4111 wAS tit z'o 1jC1iOOOV Q. � 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH Z KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 v =�- _' (425)251-8782 FAX yAk QG. CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING. YTANG ENG\NE. SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES VOL. PG. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: (PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NO.: 1357644, DATED MARCH 22, 2013) PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, AND OF THE CYRUS C LEWIS DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 37, SECTIONS 11, 14 AND 15 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHT OF WAY, WITH THE CENTERLINE OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE N0. 6313596, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 41'45'35" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 270 00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 48'14'25" EAST 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 48'14'25" EAST 144.98 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 1, A5 ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAUSE NO 591370; THENCE NORTH 52'46'36° EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN 268.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 48'14'25" WEST 196.32 FEET TO THE 5410 SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 41'45'35' WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 263.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 38 IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81'44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER UNE OF THE DUWAMISH-RENTON JUNCTION ROAD NOW PAVED, SAID CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49'24' FAST A DISTANCE OF 163 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS SAID MARGIN WAS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 591370; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 49'24' WEST; THENCE NORTH 49'24' WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WRHIN 48TH AVENUE SOUTH. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81'44'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 199.17 FEET FROM A MONUMENT (HUB) AT THE END OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE DUWAMISH-RENTON JUNCTION ROAD NOW PAVED, SAID CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE SOUTH 49'24' EAST 120.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS SAID MARGIN WAS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY MARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 40'36' EAST; THENCE NORTH 40'36' EAST 20.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF TAKEN FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 613910; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN 48TH AVENUE SOUTH. NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: LOT A: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AND NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A FOUND 2" CONCRETE FILLED IRON PIPE WITH TACK IN MONUMENT CASE AT THE CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32" EAST, ALONG THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 122.43 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 41'45'43" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERUNE, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32' EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 41'45'43" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 245.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 41'45'43" EAST A DISTANCE OF 238.70'; THENCE SOUTH 48'14'17' EAST A DISTANCE OF 196.32 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION 114 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTH 52'46'44" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 243.18 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 48'14'17" EAST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 48'14'17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT 8: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 AND NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A FOUND 2° CONCRETE FILLED IRON PIPE WITH TACK IN MONUMENT CASE AT THE CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32' EAST, ALONG THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 122.43 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF 4871-1 AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 41'45'4Y EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE SOUTH 48'13'32° EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY UNE, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 48TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 41'45'43" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 245.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48'14'17" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 149,85 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS ESTABLISHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 591370; THENCE SOUTH 52'46'44" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 249.63 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY; THENCE NORTH 48'13'32" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 102.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DRAWN BY KMA DATE 01/8/2014 SCALE: N/A CHECKED BY: 08H JOB NO.: 16068 NE1/4 & SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC. 15, AND NW1/4 & SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SEC. 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHEET 1 OF 2 RECEIVED JAN 30 2014 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@tukwllaWA.gov BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. TITLE NOTES: 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: ROADWAY, HIGHWAY, ACCESS, EGRESS RECORDING NUMBERS: 1661137, 1715306, 1722502, 2496937,5850282 AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF TUKWILA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PURPOSE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND/OR REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF A SEWER LINE OR LINES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF PARCEL B AND OTHER PROPERTY LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 1964 RECORDING NUMBER: 5683681 3. CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF UGHT, VIEW AND AIR 8Y KING COUNTY DECREE TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: ENTERED: JUNE 25, 1963 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER: 591370 4. CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1 AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR BY KING COUNTY DECREE TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: ENTERED: NOVEMBER 2, 1964 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER: 613910 5. ENCROACHMENT DISCLOSED BY TITLE POUCY DATED MAY 10, 1989: EDGE OF ASPHALT PAVING FROM PARCEL A ENCROACHES 1 FOOT, MORE OR LESS, SOUTH OF THE NORTH UNE OF PARCEL B. 6-13. NOT APPLICABLE TO BE SHOWN ON SURVEY. 14. ACCESS AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS 410 CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: STANLEY H. PETERSON AND REBECCA R. PETERSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE SUBORDINATOR: CONOCO PHILLIPS COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO TOSCO CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION RECORDED: AUGUST 14, 2008 RECORDING NUMBER: 20080814000724 15-24. NOT APPLICABLE TO 8E SHOWN ON SURVEY. FND 5/8" REBAR/CAP&TACK "B91 -I LS#6434/18723/22333" (FEBRUARY 2013) FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE CONC. FILLED 2 PIPE W/TACK (FEBRUARY 2013) SET REBAR & CAP 'BCE 40016' FOUND LEAD & TACK (FEBRUARY 2013) FOUND REBAR/CAP & TACK LABELED "BRH LS#6434 /18723/22333' (FEBRUARY 2013) FOUND TACK & WASHER (FEBRUARY 2013) as FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE 2" BRASS DISK 2/"G" CL OF 48TH AVE S (FEBRUARY 2013) 0) REBAR & CAP "BCE 40016" APN 000100-0)030 PARCEL A AM 000300-0045 EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED PARCEL E iti '2 APN 000300-0I I3 O SET REBAR & CAP J 'BCE 40016' /SET RE: AR & CAP "BCE 40016' 2F Cis J0. // o / / / /,00 0, 4, '5O / / APN 000300 – 00 32���Ffi,�� ,a6 �pC9�0 15 SET REBAR & CAP FOUND MONUMENT IN CASE BRASS PIN IN 4'X4' CONC POST INTX INTERURBAN AVE & 52ND/56TH AVE S. (FEBRUARY 2013) NCE 40016" NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY BLDG COR. 1.2' NW OF PROP. LINE Fla 20 40 80 1jO SCALE: 1-=40' L./4 0001 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DRAWN 8Y KMA DATE 01/8/2014 SCALE: = 40' CHECKED BY: OBH JOB NO.: 16068 REBAR & CAP 'BCE 40016' VOL. PG. DATES OF SURVEY: FIELD SURVEY BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CONDUCTED IN FEBRUARY, 2013. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS FOUND WERE VISITED AT THAT TIME. REFERENCE SURVEYS: 1. R.D.S., REC. N0. 7409230426 2. R.0.5., REC. N0. 8202039010 3. R.O.S., REC. N0. 9803099003 4. ALTA/ACSM SURVEY BY BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC., DATED 1-30-89 5. SITE AS -BUILT MAP BY JOHN E. EWING AND ASSOCIATES, DATED 3-11-80 EXISTING LOT AREAS: PARCEL A 45,000± S.F. (1.03± ACRES) PARCEL 8: 27,186± S.F. (0.62± ACRES) TOTAL LOT AREA: 72,186 S.F. (1.66± ACRES) NEW LOT AREAS: PARCEL A 41,315± S.F. (0.95± ACRES) PARCEL B: 30,871± S.F. (0.71± ACRES) TOTAL LOT AREA: 72,186 S.F. (1.66± ACRES) PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE: A FIELD TRAVERSE USING A TRIMBLE 5800 AND A LEICA TCR703 SUPPLEMENTED WITH FIELD NOTES, WAS PERFORMED, ESTABUSHING THE ANGULAR, AND DISTANCE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS, PROPERTY LINES AND IMPROVEMENTS. THE RESULTING DATA MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS FOR LAND BOUNDARY SURVEYS AS SET FORTH IN WAC 332-130-090. BASIS OF BEARINGS: NAD 83/91 SOUTH 88'35"57' EAST, AS MEASURED BETWEEN WGS HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 93H-902 AND 93H-901. LEGEND (NOTE NOT ALL SYMBOLS MAY APPEAR ON THE MAP) �I O 0 D4 ®A EB U - w- - G - - T(XX)- -P(XX)- - SD - - SS - LUMINAIRE (LUM.) YARD LIGHT POWER METER POWER POLE JUNCTION BOX (AS NOTED) TELEPHONE MANHOLE CATCH BASIN (C8) STORM MANHOLE (SDMH) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) CLEANOUT (AS NOTED) GAS METER GAS VALVE WATER VALVE (W(V) FIRE HYDRANT(FH)/CONNECTION(FDC) WATER MANHOLE WATER METER BLOW-OFF/AIRVAC SIGN MONITOR WELL DIRECTIONAL ARROW SURVEY MONUMENT (AS NOTED) BENCHMARK SECTION CORNER (AS NOTED) FOUND LEAD/TACK SURVEY CONTROL STATION HANDICAP PARKING SPACE BUILDING LINE CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BARBED WIRE FENCE HOGWIRE FENCE WATER UNE GAS UNE OVERHEAD/UNDERGROUND TEL. LINE OVERHEAR/UNDERGROUND PWR. LINE STORM LINE SEWER LINE NE1/4 & SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC. 15, AND NW1/4 & SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SEC. 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON KANDERSON X File:P:\16000s\16066\survey \ plats \1606661a01.dwg Date/Time:1/23/2014 1 SHEET 2 OF /j'f O7J9 45-0" MODIFIED DRIVE 48TH AVE S S41'45'43'W 1399.73' (MCAS.) —0 45-0" 19'-5' MODIFIED DRIVE 9 8 o 0 00 PYLON SIGN 2 EXIT ONLY SIGN TYP OF 2 0 I EX. DRIVE LANDSCAPE 5-0" 68-11" 25.0" 134'-9" 5-(Y' ENTER ONLY SIGN TYP OF 2 NEN SIDWALK IN 1FUEL PLAN SCALE 1:20 ;G e3 00.. ,, 0 o_ -____o___-:_, r; j FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED NORTH 2 VICINITY MAP NTS SUBJECT SITE FUELING ISLAND WITH DISPENSER. SEE ELEVATIONS UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS 25-0" LOT SIZE 41,315 SF PROPO"7D 25 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN PROCESS NEW PROPANE TANK IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 35,119 SF = 85% ZONING: CLI - COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FOSTER STEPHEN -D C # 38 CYRUS C LEWIS DC #37 POR SD DC #38 & POR DC 937 IN SECS 11-14 & 15-23-04 DAF - BEG AT CONCRETE MON AT NXN OF C/L OF SEA TRANS LN R/W WITH C/L OF 48TH AVE SO AF #6313596 TH N 41-45-35 E ALG SD C/L 270 FT TH S 48-14-25 E 25 FT TO SELY MGN OF SD AVE & TPOB TH CONT S 48-14-25 E 144.98 FT TO NWLY MGN CF PSH NO 1 TH N 52-46-36 E ALG 5D NWLY MGN 268.65 FT TH N 48-14-25 W 196.32 FT TO SELY MGN 5D AVE 0-1 S 41-45-35 W 263.70 FT TO TPOB TOTAL OF 1.033 AC M/L PARCEL NUMBER: 000300-0045 1-5 OFF RAMP APE (E) WSDOT FENCE NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE Z../V°°61 ECENED JAS 28 2011k (;( CO)rl`4N11;,1 AVI' fU Z O w 5 w a Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S - Tuckwila, WA 98166 9 2 S 55 Project Number: 2007833019 rle Nome. prn. (1140. Oaen. YY.1111.D0 Drawing No. Revision Sheet 1 of- 2 8a >71 .Z7 a • CLAD COLUMNS _�- FUEL PUMP 1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16 = 1 -0 2 WEST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16 = 1 -0 3 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16- = 1' -0 - SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 3/16 = 1-0 24' 12' Clearance 4.6" 1 ip 0 OASIS WHITE OASIS SILVER (decal recommended) ALIGN TOP OF REDS i OASIS REO Maximum height of Red on column is 30" O Valance Q Pump topper (15" x 24") ©Safety Decal 0 MPD © Rag Mount - Fueling Position 0 Amenity "Combo Unit" O Clearance Decal OASIS SILVER I OASIS RED CHARCOAL, GRAY OR DARK GRAY TYPICAL DETAILS p� �.$ 204 5 NOT TO SCALE L i4-aooy TRUCK FUELING ISLAND 13100 48th Ave S • Tuckwila, WA 98188 8 8 8 8 1= Project Number 2007833019 r.6 : Den. _ Cnte. Dea". rr.uN.DD Drawing No. Revision Sheet 2 of 2 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED TT FB 84 0 rP '1 91 84 • ■ E T — u PROPERTY UNE R.O.W. CENTERLINE EASEMENT A.C. PAVING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL GRADING CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION SV/ALE GRADE BREAK WATER MAIN SEMEN MAIN STORM DRAIN FIRE HYDRANT WATER MEIER GATE VALVE SEWER MANHOLE STORM CB STORM MANHOLE ELECTRICAL LINE TELEPHONE UNE GAS UNE POWER VAULT UTILITY PGE a1ERE1 UGHT NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA PROPERTY INFO PARCEL NO, 000300-0045 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL k THAT P061106 OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO 38, AND OF THE CYRUS C LENTS DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 37, SECTIONS 11, 14 AND 15 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECI1EN OF THE CENTERUNE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE TRANSMISSION UNE RIGHT OF WAY, Willi THE CENTERLINE OF 48111 AVENUE SOUTH AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE N0. 6313596, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. THENCE NORTH 41'45'35 EAST ALONG SAID CENTERUNE 270 00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 4814'25' EAST 25.00 FEET TO 111E SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID 4811 AVENUE SOUTH AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 4814'25' EAST 144.98 FEET TO THE NOIRIHWESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 1, AS ESTABUSHED BY JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF APPROPRIATION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAUSE NO 591370; THENCE NORTH 52'46'36' EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN 268.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4814'25' NEST 196.32 FEET TO THE SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 48TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 41'45'35' NEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 263.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING BASIS OF BEARING SOUTH 88'35'57 EAST, AS MEASURED BETYEEN NGS HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 931-902 AND 93H-901 (NAD 83/91) VERTICAL DATUM NGS VERTICAL CONTROL PONT N0. 93V-513, BEING THE TOP OF FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CAS AT THE INTERSECTION OF S 144TH ST., 51ST AVE S AND MACADAM RD. S. ELEV. = 160.18 US FEET (NAND 88) r N S41'45'43"W 1399.73' (MEAS.) I 48TH AVE. S. NEW 45¢' -NDE ORN1'. 0 OJTC C, CURB OETIA8 NEW 45.0' -WOE DENY. Ex gyp{ 0.0PoWN 1 EX..00NG ADEWALII.TO REMAIN • g,3"F U3-7°' [%. CONC. 90EWAu( EX FIRE HYDRANT 1/427,4 fr 552'46.44 11 203.7F — ABOVE GROUND : TANK & CONC. PAD New cox. cues 552'4'44..68— GRAPHIC SCALE TO 93 ( IN FEET 5 1 inch - 20 9. !NTE -E5 VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S.f1 PROJECT TEAM CIVIL ENGINEER TERRAFOPoU DE924 GROUP, INC. 5027 5107 AVENUE 5W SEATTLE, WA 98136 CONTACT: PEDRO DEGUZMAN, PE PHONE: (206) 923-0590 EMAIL: pedrolkodinkcom GOVERNING AGENCIES GRADING. DRAINAGE ROAD WATER 501108 CITY OF IUKNILA 6300 S011T9CENTER BOULEVARD pa) TUKWILA, WA 98188 CONTACT: DAVID MCPHERSON PHONE: (206) 431-2448 PROJECT DATA EX PROPERTY AREA= 45,000 S (1.03 AC) NEW PROPERTY AREA= 41,315 S (0.95 AC) EARTHWORK QUANTITIES DTE STRIPPING = 459 BCY SUBGRADE OJT = 351 BCY 91BGRADE RLL - 375 BCY • FOR PERMIT USE ONLY EX IMPERVIOUS AREA= 31,156 S PROP. IMPERVIOUS AREA- 35.341 S NET CHANGE IMPERVIOUS AREA= +4185 S SHEET INDEX C1 PRELIMINARY PAVING PLAN C2 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN (•()tJa°11°)NOS" istft sway TDG NO. 13035 z 0 06 w w a Permit -Seal TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48th Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 PRELIMINARY PAVING PLAN S 4 a C FR• Ncmr 1101EM.00 Drawing NO. C1 ONOva. SWLr - ,wi O Revision Sheet 1 0f 2 8 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED I PROPERTY UNE R.O.W. CENTERUNE EASEMENT CONCRETE omacm RETAINING WALL —100— —100— GRADING CONTOUR +90.00 SPOT ELEVATION SWALE ------ GRADE BREAK _ 8 �I — 8 W WATER MAIN SEWER MAIN STORM DRAIN YY Y FIRE HYDRANT B3 MI WATER METER D4 N GATE VALVE Q • SEWER MANHOLE ❑ ■ STORM CB ® Q STORM MANHOLE — E — ELECTRICAL UNE — T — TELEPHONE UNE — C — GAS UNE rP- I POWER VAULT o UTILITY POLE OXY 40C STREET UGIT 7 A r P9�S0P.o P<t` GG,�liX o!0 /,PPP 20 rl `9.0 EX 03 y;_, 614 18.60 IE• 1460 (EX. 12'48) 14.40 (01 12'SE) *-° tie l4( tie �T<20((n y "P6,10 0P�cA E. SDMH RIM= 16.99 (LOVER 10 18.75) IE- 14.44 (EX. 12 -NW) 1E- 14.39 (EX. 12'5E) E. 14.43 (EX. 12 58( IE- 14.51 (EX. 15'91E) STORIIECH CHAMBER DETENTION SYSTEM IE(OUT)= 15.00 SEE DIL 1/C2 POWER POLEFO,p"F� W/TRANSORMER,�'90 iy LUMINAIRE,f" -SIS AND UG WIRE 'ex FOR INFORMATION CALL STORMTECH (866) 647-3362 SC -740 END CAP SC -740 CHAMBER 3/4 - 2 INCH CLEAN, OPEN GRADED, ANGULAR AGGREGATE NW 114 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA GRANULAR WELL GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <350 EINES. COMPACT IN 6 IN UFTS TO 950 PROCTOR DENSITY. SEE 1HE TABLE OF ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS IN STORMIECH'S DESIGN MANUAL, INSTALLATION MANUAL, OR WNIWSTORMIECH.COM. PAVEMENT EX. SOIL AASHTO M288 CUSS 2 NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND STONE YI 51' ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY TO BE FIELD TESTED GRADE VARIES PER PLAN EL= 19.0 MIN. OVER STORMIECH EL= 17.50 EL= 15001 BOT. OF UVE-STORAGE AMBERS EL= 14.00: BOT. OF EXCAVATION FIELD GEOTECH ENGINEER TO CONFIRM ADEQUATE BASE THICKNESS PROPOSED 18 CHAMBERS FWD VOL (EL 15.0- 17.0)=843 CF STORMTECH DETENTION (SC -740 SECTION) SCALE: N.T.S. �ssag I- 18.86 • WATER 8-102 (EX 1288) METER E-8.92 (EX 12'58) 541'45143"W 1399.73' (MEAS.) N EX. CONC. CURB & 050809 TO REMAIN EE.CONC. %kelt 4 70.1b444 1.1 N4.1145'431:283 20' EX. FIRE HYDRANT NEW 1' DOMESTIC RPBA & HOTBOX NEW 1' IRRIG. DEDUCT MEIER & DCVA. 2211 EIC C8 rRal ) RIR= 19.93.........._.. IE= 14.99 (08 10 N 113 STOR 1 CAR RIM= 8. IE= 1.2 04 /9 STGRMEILIER 4 -CARTRIDGES RIM= 18.50 IE= 16.20 /17 0 l(yr O� O 0 Oo kO _ — V1 \ �P 2O� yFP 44-viZ2— .7g� 6 x '5' (16 cGy p2p;1•Po co 'e GRAPHIC SCALE e 9 x 6y. Qyllo Sg15'—� 2C U. F S�,rF -X08.65 k 111', A!. j Jy -QP .F ( IN FEET) 1 Inch = 20 N. INTERS TA 9 x� — 14- way TDG NO. 13035 Z 0 1E, CC 9 3500 a 0.l 'ermit-Seal TRUCK FUELING STATION 13100 48th Avenue South - Tukwila, WA 98168 1 60 C7 -I Z >- -=C rx 0 1- co o6 Lll 2a C EL 0 Project Number. 2007833019 File Name. SHEET - Mal 0 Oen. Chkd. Doan. YY.MM.00 Drawing No. C2 Revision Sheet 2 of 2 • Ilii runs J' PRIG' FOR 0- 48TH AVE. S. -TREE& 1 PER EACH XLi dQIC0IC CUFIEU15 (-5 11EES) -SHRUBS 1 PER EACH 7 Li, ER71d1C CURB OITS OR 24 PU*IED BEAM (-21 SFi1UB5) -I21a2IDLOER LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN ao 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 0,0 (IN FEET) 1 Inch - 20 ft. 0.10110 51.1 - 5511 D INTEINTE-ES MI IAICSdNNG 5E -190110 1 PER 8044 20 Li eciceG MECUM (-9 TREES) -SHRUBS 1 PER EAII 51T. 8X0110918 CURB 0125 (-35 9WB5) -09119E031EA PLANT SCHEDULE TREES 5114810 5CEN1910 NAME COMMON NAME NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, T23N, R4E. , W.M., CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WA 1/28/14 sp2 VICINITY MAP SCALE N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TERRAFORMA DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5027 515T AVENUE SW SEATTLE, WA 98136 CONTACT: AKE1/1 SAKAIDA, LA PHONE: (206) 923-0590 EMAIL: dlan)Oldi.k.c0m GOVERNING AGENCIES PLANNING CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD /100 1UKLWLA, WA 96188 CONTACT: MINNIE DHAUWAL PHONE (206) 431-3670 2 EMAIL ie.dhdi*1NOtukw6owo.go4 IIAN1111 9211 (YN.) 5,ACNG (MAK) NOTES STATE OF Wl9Wl0T16 REO9EBE0 LAIl19CNi ARCHITECT abn>v 614.4 MEM RAE 56AOA CERTIFICATE NO. 794 MITES 16/19/14 SHRUBS STYROL ii Q GROUNDCOVER EASING TREES TO BE 481/041/ C008*50S LUTEA 9E1109 WOOD MAWS TED BARROW REO BARRON CRABAPPLE THUJA PUCATA 'FA5110ATA' HOGAN 1980 5 2 CAL (RN.) AS 9100* IS 0 CAL (WN.) 20' 3 6' TA1 A5 910** 0044F1RM 4014041E PROR TO CONSTRUCTION. REM04: 51016.80015 ALIO All CERN. NATIING FIN, SINGLE IRNA, 04. BRANCHING RCT. 5 MATCHING ECRU, SINGLE 1RNK, MN. BRANCH HEIGHT 5' 9241E TRUNK. FILL cn 5 :5 — 1 it 5} ZO :11o - WE 2 E i ,,z40,1 hA 11 wir co cn a 3 Z 500111110 NAYS COMMON NAME O 101111 9240 (YIN.) 5PACING (MAK.) NOTES Q F RHCOCOENORN 'Pk IS 5 GALLON AS 91004 NLL. 1481 1140 0 PM RNOOCOETORON ▪ N Z m PINUS MUO10 9 2 GALLON AS 510191 NLL. MATCING J NU010 PINE Z j 0 ROBES SNNQIINEUM }GALLON AS 910'X1 NLL.YULn-S7EM 21 0 1.1- Y 14 t 1LOAERIN0 CURRANT °xx' Q. 51 V VIBURNUM DAM 3} 2 GALLON AS 540NN NLL. MILTI BRANOIEO S U -I 0 DAVID'S NBURUS W � Q WRING 1QUE 41 2 GALLON AS 90714 FULL MATCHING 9N+Nc eaaE1 vBuraNUM - k P EtiSea 5CE140M NAME 5280. COM110N NAE NOTE: - SHRUBS TO BE 10 TALL YNNUM, *0EASE CON044(0 92E TO MEET REQUIREMENT. Il11T1 9040 (149.) SPACNG (YAK) NOTES CRASS 4500 3 - - INSTALL PER WC. C NO NET 500E DURAL 1 RASEASON PERENNIAL RYE X8 111BR05FFD UMW/ 54AMAE9R15 150 1 GALLON 24 ' TRIANGULAR FULL, MULTI S1/NED, HEATHY GERMANDER *NCA MINOR 300 1 GALLON 20 TRIANGULAR FULL 01510. MULn-51FM PERI0NGE lo282014 (.()tAntf O MENT (lf /f - Uta. 01.1. YY.19.00 Drawing No. L1 Revision Sheet 1 of