Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL14-0011 - MICHAEL BULLERI / BAKER COMMODITIES - WASTE WATER TREATMENT TANKBAKER COMMODITIES 5795 S 130T" ST PL14-0011 E14-0004 SEPA ADDENEUM TO E13-0016 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director SEPA ADDENDUM TO DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE E13-0016 Description of current proposal: Replace rather than repair an existing, deteriorated 100,000 gallon tank at Baker Commodities, a rendering plant with a new 100,000 gallon tank. File Number: E14-0014. Proponent: Mike Bulleri for Baker Commodities. Location of current proposal: 5795 South 130th Place, Tukwila, WA. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Title of Document being added to: SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance, issued by the City of Tukwila on October 23, 2013. Date documents were prepared: March 10, 2014 and August 27, 2013 Documents Available for review at: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report dated March 31, 2014, the lead agency has determined that there are no adverse impacts associated with the replacement of the 100,000 gallon tank at the Baker Commodities site. Address: 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Contact Person: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Telephone: 206-431-3661 Responsible Official: Jack Pace, Director Signature: cc: Files: E13-016, E14-0004 CL H:\\Baker Commodities\SEPA Addendum -E1300016 Page 1 of 1 Telephone: 206-431-3670 Date: 03/31/2014 4:38 PM March 31, 2014 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Pace, DCD Director and SEPA Responsible Official FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner RE: E14-0004 Addendum to E13-0016: Baker Commodities Proposal: Amend the SEPA checklist for E13-0016, a Determination of Nonsignificance issued October 23, 2013 for the following work: • Replace one 20,000 gallon tank and add one new 20,000 gallon tank to store waste water from the rendering facility. The addition of the new tank will allow the waste water to be held longer on site for treatment prior to discharge to the City's sewer system and is not considered an expansion of the nonconforming use on site. At the time of the 2013 SEPA submittal, Baker planned to repair an existing 100,000 gallon tank located in a concrete containment area. When repairs were initiated, Baker determined that the tank has reached the end of its useful life and cannot be repaired, so must be replaced. As a result, the original SEPA Checklist has been revised to add the replacement of the existing 100,000 gallon tank in addition to the replacement of a 20,000 gallon tank and the addition of a 20,000 gallon tank. At the time of the initial SEPA determination, the City reviewed the proposal to assess whether the replacement and addition of two 20,000 gallon tanks was an expansion of the unclassified use on the site and determined it was not. Substituting a new 100,000 gallon tank for a deteriorated 100,000 gallon tank will not expand the capacity of the rendering facility. Findings: 1. Repair of an existing 100,000 gallon tank is not possible due to its advanced deterioration. 2. The replacement of the 100,000 gallon tank with a tank of the same size is not an expansion of the existing unclassified use on the site. 3. The revisions to the proposed project fall within the impacts analyzed in the original SEPA Checklist and do not represent a substantial change to the Determination of Nonsignificance issued by this Department. CL 1-1:\\Baker Commodities\SEPA Addendum -Staff Rpt. Page 1 of 2 03/31/2014 4:36 PM /Th Baker Commodities SEPA Addendum — E14-006 March 31, 2014 Conclusion: The City has reviewed the checklist submitted by Baker Commodities for E13-016 and the additional information submitted for the SEPA Addendum, E14-0004, and determined that it, along with City staff analysis, is adequate in evaluating the impacts associated with replacing the existing 100,000 gallon tank with a new 100,000 tank. Related Information: 1. SEPA Checklists (E13-0016 and E14-006) 2. ESA Screening Checklists 3. Structural Drawings prepared by DHP Engineering dated 9-3-13 4. Applicant TMC 18.66.120 Compatibility Analysis dated September 6, 2013 5. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan, prepared by Seeler Engineering, P.C. September, 2011 cc: Files: E13-016, E14-0004 CL H:\\Baker Commodities \SEPA Addendum Staff Rpt. Page 2 of 2 03/31/2014 4:36 PM C�J��l1LA 1,1,gs � � ��\ Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director C --- City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor October 23, 2013 TO: NOTICE OF DECISION Michael Bulleri, Baker Commodities King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: DETERMINATION: ZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: E13-016 Michael Bulleri, Baker Commodities Replace one 20,000 gallon tank and add one new 20,000 gallon tank to store waste water from the rendering facility. The addition of the new tank will allow the waste water to be held longer on site for treatment prior to discharge to the City's sewer system and is not considered an expansion of the nonconforming use on site. 5795 South 130th Place, Tukwila Determination of Nonsignificance Light Industrial Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA, Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at 206-431-3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes not withstanding any program of revaluation. The decision is appealable to King County Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). WJack Pace, Direj//:// ctor Department of Community Development SEPA Responsible Official CL Page 1 of 1 10/21/2013 2:42 PM H:\Baker Commodities-E13-016\Notice of Decision CityQ Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: htto://www.TukwilaWA.gov DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E13-016 Applied: 09/09/2013 Issue Date: 10/23/2013 Status: ISSUED Applicant: BAKER COMMODITIES Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: REPLACE ONE 20,000 GALLON TANK AND INSTALL ONE NEW 20,000 GALLONG TANK TO HOLD WASTE WATER UNTIL IT IS DISCHARGED TO THE CITY'S SEWER SYSTEM. THE ADDITION OF THE NEW TANK DOES NOT EXPAND THE NONCONFORMING USE ON THE SITE, Location of Proposal: Address: 5795 S 130 PL TUKW Parcel Number: 0001400005 Section/Township/Range: NW & NE 14-23-04 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by it. _ (o " ' 3 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Jac k Pace Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of actic unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) ,Inn. nKIC_A/n7 C19 n1C City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: October 23, 2013 TO: Jack Pace, Director, Dept. of Community Development FM: Carol Lumb, Senior Plane RE: Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist E13-006: Baker Commodities Tank Replacement and Addition I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposal is to replace and relocate one 20,000 gallon storage tank and to install one new storage tank of 20,000 gallons to increase the amount of storage time for waste water on the site. The additional retention time for the waste water will allow better quality water treatment. The property is the site of a rendering facility which is located on a parcel surrounded on three sides by the Duwamish River. The tank replacement/addition is located outside of the shoreline jurisdiction. Baker Commodities Site CL Page 1 of 6 H:\\Baker Commodities El 3-006\Staff Rpt. 10/22/2013 9:10 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 F1 Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 ooation for aste W ter Tanks II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant: Location: Agencies with Jurisdiction: Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: Notification: Baker Commodities Tank Replacement 154ft Mike Bulleri, General Manager, Baker Commodities The site is located at 5795 South 130th Place, Tukwila, WA 98178. The tax parcel number is 000140-0005. City of Tukwila, Washington State Department of Ecology Light Industrial (LI) Notice of Application was mailed to tenants and property owners within 500 feet of the project and posted•on a public notice board located at the street end of 56th Avenue South in Foster Point (for better visibility to adjacent residents) on October 8, 2013. Other Required Permits: D 13-290, building permit for tank installation The following information was considered as part of review of this application: CL Page 2 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 1. SEPA Checklist dated August 27, 2013 2. ESA Screening Checklist dated August 27, 2013 3. Structural Drawings prepared by DHP Engineering dated 9-3-13 4. Applicant TMC 18.66.120 Compatibility Analysis 5. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan, prepared by Seeler Engineering, P.C., September, 2011 NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Carol Lumb, Senior Planner, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188; telephone 206- 431-3661. III. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. Background The proposal is to replace one 20,000 gallon storage tank and add one new tank of the same size to increase the amount of storage time for waste water on the site prior to discharge to the public sewer system. The tank to be replaced is located elsewhere on the property. The waste water tanks will be located together in the location identified in the photo above. The additional retention time for the waste water will allow better quality water treatment. The property is the site of an animal rendering facility which is located on a parcel surrounded on three sides by the Duwamish River. The tank replacement/addition is located outside of the shoreline jurisdiction. The rendering facility is an unclassified use in the zoning district in which it is located. This will be discussed further under the Land Use section of the checklist. 1-6. Concur with checklist. 7. Spill Prevention control and Countermeasure Plan has been prepared for the site. 8-11. Concur with checklist. 12. Portions of the parcel on which the proposed project is located lie within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction, which is considered an environmentally sensitive area. The tanks in question will be located outside the shoreline jurisdiction. CL H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. Page 3 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 B. Environmental Elements Earth: a -h. Concur with checklist. Air: a -c. Concur with checklist. The tanks are vented to air scrubbers. Best management practices will be implemented during construction activities to reduce and control dust and air emissions. Water: a -d. Concur with checklist. The site is required to have a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan to contain any spills from the water storage tanks as well as the other storage tanks on the site. A copy of this plan was submitted as part of the SEPA application. The subject parcel is surrounded on three sides by the Duwamish River, a shoreline of the state however, the subject tanks will be located outside the shoreline jurisdiction. Plants: a -d. Concur with checklist. Animals: a -d. Concur with checklist. The site is located along the Pacific Flyway, a route for migratory birds. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c. Concur with checklist. Environmental Health: a. The Spill Containment Plan addresses the possibility of a spill from the subject tanks, which store waste water. The tanks are located in an area that is fully paved and diked for containment. The site is sloped to collection sumps which collect fluids and pumps them to treatment. The Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan states that "...Catastrophic failure of the secondary containment system could result in a release to the Duwamish River which bounds the site on three sides." b. Concur with checklist. Land and Shoreline Use: a -d. Concur with checklist. CL H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. Page 4 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 e and f. The Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation on the site is Light Industrial (LI). The rendering plant is an unclassified use in the LI district. As part of the SEPA application, the applicant provided responses to a series of criteria found in TMC 18.66.120, which apply to the rending plant. These criteria are to be used to determine whether the unclassified use is being expanded through a particular action being proposed for the site. The City concurs with the applicant's responses to these criteria that the replacement of one tank and the addition of a second is not an expansion of the current unclassified use as it does not increase the manufacturing capacity of the facility. h. Much of the Baker Commodities parcel lies within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction, which is considered an environmentally sensitive area governed by TMC 18.44. The proposed waste water tanks lie outside the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction. i-1. Concur with checklist. Housing: a -c. Concur with checklist. Aesthetics: a -c. Concur with checklist. Light and Glare: a -d. Concur with checklist Recreation: a -c. Concur with checklist Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c. Concur with checklist Transportation: a -g. Concur with checklist. Public Services: a -b. Concur with checklist. CL H:\\Baker Commodities E13-006\Staff Rpt. Page 5 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM (Th Baker Commodities Tank Replacement & Addition E13-006: Staff Report October 23, 2013 Utilities: a -b. Concur with checklist. Comments: 0 No comments were received during the Notice of Application period. RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -significance CL Page 6 of 6 10/22/2013 9:10 AM H:\\Baker Commodities E13-0064Staff Rpt. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Re.,pL,ale,meniT Dc E 15 K9Abeae GCaowd r vK 2. Name of Applicant: QAKetC Cow+0,4nAti'teS INC 3. Date checklist prepared: 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. /4/0 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N'A 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N/4 Agency Comments W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. AUi►d,NG TLA Kw: Le 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Repl.c1ee ni1143 Abode CGrouv.id Tct. K ►n©,(DOD GoL i anlcse, -e. COPT lGtNMan) T /=iReri 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 579S Si cn-i 130 PLc.ce ScaTTvc \,41 000t(-iO- 000S-oG, 4/Z0o-2,35800-aq 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? N Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): (i), rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Agency Comments b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? /V /A c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. /Nome F1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ND g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NoNr h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NCNF b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Na Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: TAN YeN iec! Tv Air Scruber 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. (cc/4 /2u -s/, 7Zi t1E'r 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Al 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NoNC O Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. N 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. NQ Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: NoNg c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ALL wra*er /S "oL2ected a,'d Gocs j i Our eA.jAfer TlhGi/'ieN/ SYSfet1 • 77-cdted Wafer 6oe3 To Pu bt is 6-rwer 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N%A c� Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. CHjYc.6 K- G'recr! / u/R0,1sN -,Ue-( d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Agency Comments Deciduous tree: de , nap b, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, (CP-, pine, other �Shniis' ras Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. CHjYc.6 K- G'recr! / u/R0,1sN -,Ue-( d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Agency Comments Please respond toquestions. Use separate sheets as nece's'sary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: aw heron, - agle', r ngbirds) other: Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish Other Bass, €lmo trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. CA/moo 4reeN vuwa,v>ISA Q,oc.r c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Noy Pcri OF eam/racf/DN APce 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. J7AN uricleru riN G ,EL e c T r � c Agency Comments f1 Please respond to questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No /grid/ fioNa1- Put,70sor /No16/5 Ncedeol co/ "*NK 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: `ran//( is Jr/ ecdVta,,vpk yr Area. Please respond toquestions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? /Vane 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. No 'ye 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? I1A,VQL%AeTur,Ncv / !Ra>l recti b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No Please respond to 'questions. Use separate sheets as nece se ary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. bf ceS, P A/ 7' Pro duel/ bide,Jiorc;e , NAv1/ 51d6 ,-river d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 6)(iS/ n 6 GJnsfe WAterTa.✓X 7//ar w,z1 be /ePlace d w,rN NP) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Unic Lassa fled Use. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? NJA g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. n/p Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A Agency Comments j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? MOVE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Ailm 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. //%A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 3Sraw b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Nc,ve c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NaAte b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ND c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Naiv E d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? �1 �1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N /A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Nd b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. /Sl IA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. `5ov77/ /30 n`% PLace Sean -Lc W,9 98/7,4 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 1-r7,6e c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). ryD e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Agency Comments 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: 0 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. f owe - .SecTTLe £ F V 2,q#W Power ciL re c V Pxis r For ribs %aNX (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? A/ONE Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N !A fl Please respond to all questions. 1 se separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Nr A71-;cT Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Nba 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? A/% Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N%a 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No A1"FcT Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 7'/A' i,S /N !DN/ain, New/ ,Qfc'a 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? -2)oe5 Nod f'Rc'cr /a A. oe vSI/eveI,,v Ilse Proposed 'measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: /v /A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? NO /NC C0G.SC Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: (1 Please respond to all questions. l'e separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. A/© &, /Yi c T D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 4 Date Submitted: 3/iz /i </ 1 Agency Comments City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: .57/ 47// Applicant Name: BA K of e o nim a d, he 5 /Ale Street Address: 57 5 .50,,The 130 771 Pk. City, State, Zip: See rrze l a) 7-) 98/78 Telephone: 10 (0 Z'/3 - 73 87 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Part A: Please review aLenswer each question carefully. Consider 11 phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. NI Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please circle appropriate response. 0 - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. IContinue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. 11 Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc uny of 1 uKwua1 f1 bcreenzng unecKust Part A (continued) f 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. C3 — Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. El)I- Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. e_ Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. �,- Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 amity of 1 uKulna Jcreemng LnecKczst Part B (continued) 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. 0- Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. 0- Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. til✓ Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) Ltty of 1 uKunUa tJI Screening LnecKust Part D: Please review eanluestion below for projects that includ irk below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes bothbotemporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. tVO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. 9- Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. (....4- Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. @- Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 Lay of 1 uKunta 15f bcreerung LnecKtzst 3-6 Will the project Olt in impacts to watercourses or wetlands t have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. )- Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplannci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at , j 795 $o,1 130m PL Se' TTde ccifl ?$17A for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at 7; %(W .' LGL (city), 14/ (state), on naAc ,4 7 20 / 7 Print Name Michael h. QvlLer' Address 5796— .5.,,r7f /JOIN PL SSG17Lc , w,a 98/ 7$ Phone Number 20(n 2.4/3- 7337 Signature On this day personally appeared before me ad, L a l6, I to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 7 �i D Y rfi� .�� I i cfofl''ta on ap4 x/e/ residing at 20 e of Washington My Commission expii .s Id/f 9f071.3 W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan7011.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development ENVIRONMENTAL 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 REVIEW E-mail: tukplanAci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: la hone Gro(.n,a s fe, L� �f 2��'QCe,v�er�T of E-4)SfiN� 7eN/G LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 5795 So /3o' PL Sec: tc c,ita 9$178 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 000 -/yo -0005 -off '/2o0 - 23Saoo DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: /%tChoc' L 'St,LLcr, Address: ,5795 Scum /30771' PL Sec.TTLc WA 98/78 Phone: 20C., 2c/3 - 73 87 LAI /°O Box 56368 5eoTrle, (AM- `/ 8138 FAX: Zot, zy3 -F3 y/ a E-mail: y.?buLtcr, G bakeceo) m,i od,fjt"s ,cv.l Signature: Date: „VIP W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: E / Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: 1---1 ,- (I) l 1 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: / 5 -,it/ ( D NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: la hone Gro(.n,a s fe, L� �f 2��'QCe,v�er�T of E-4)SfiN� 7eN/G LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 5795 So /3o' PL Sec: tc c,ita 9$178 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 000 -/yo -0005 -off '/2o0 - 23Saoo DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: /%tChoc' L 'St,LLcr, Address: ,5795 Scum /30771' PL Sec.TTLc WA 98/78 Phone: 20C., 2c/3 - 73 87 LAI /°O Box 56368 5eoTrle, (AM- `/ 8138 FAX: Zot, zy3 -F3 y/ a E-mail: y.?buLtcr, G bakeceo) m,i od,fjt"s ,cv.l Signature: Date: „VIP W:\Forms\Applications, Land Use\2011 Applications\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc r: DrICCETE ':ALL A IC \7 0CF :CAL[ orrirc BLDG c e -ITE "IMF s PUMP TD .ATEF TF'EATMENT , • 'r ONTPOL PM/ (Orl:PETE :PILL TOF•MVATEF PETEFITI011 _1PUEluPE GFA:: PI':EF CME -� F F. COOLING -T. TIP. EF 111 EDGE OF F'A. EMEFIT :111 CAF:ET At EF T.. PE:I1'E1 10E I SCF TF AN LILAC: TO IOIL EP FIEALI (:ILO iWEAL) ILO, :1TE -NMF FUMF '.ITE :LIMPr PUMP IN EDT TOM Or EINTAIrINE1:1 1O L'ATEP TPEATMENT FPpr E'c F L LG -'JTILIT+ O\.?IED DIL FILLED TFANFDPMEP LAWI EF LOADING 1 O� EF•HEAD 1 FPdpur7 1 TPAFI]ELF' •+ LIE PA'+(ND: 1 —� OIL,- I-IJFPD: ANT-, 1TOPAGE 'II":1DE EL DG • QC -0'.EF HEAD F FODLJC 7 TFA14:rE.F LINE Il I MEAL :ILO LOADING DOCF r.1 r F: APE KW:E - •:ATEP ( If kEF '4T ` 0-1111PAULIL nu_ `. TFEa7M l i I l ,,EATIWG OIL \-TF W ATEF .-TFAF .'ATEF �•\ iAlr prF COAT �F' EF FIt OFFLOAD I' I LOADINGTAI!1' I T" A0FA1 , l�/ •.ATEF.' TF'EATNEIdi (�, AKAt10OVTIET \_ p) (7 ) „q V 4.1 AC TE OIL al tl` DPI int- / I :TOPAGE NO OUTLE1 EDGE OF °'A' HEWT IAN! EP'- LOADI?IG LOADINI) FAD TD L DIIT AI1I'IFl•IT-� ICEFICF'ETE- 1'GA'DL 1WC LIT C OIITAII'IMEFIT : T F•Ur TOPE I. FF 7IOV (F_1 (F_ • .�, GF'.. +EL DF'I•YE-A+ �\ UF'A: / FFD_E: (':a7EF) i FL DG k / L - PIE; ELI ICT -__ DI:F'EN:EP FuELITIC., PAD '/LTH :UI0 EDGE Or PAVEFIC — GP -A --� :TEFL LLINT AIIIMCIII .1.111F r. F'Vt7F ''-0\:EFHEAD 0004!111 70,0090 EF LINE I ITC :IMF' FI HF- TO Ir '•AICE irrATIEFIT 15%Gr 'TO FLPG riu oci (APAII1I TANI: 00 (GALLON(..) CONTENT; 1 5-5,30 ,-1 AFVU ' :7,000 AFV(I NORTH 11) 53,3110 AFVO SOUTH (_') r3,300 AFVO 7 21,400 AP/0 8 23,0110 AFVO y ^3,000 AFVO i0 23,000 AFVO II )3,000 A.FVO 12 53,300 AFV0 13 '1,4011 AFVO 14 ',,000 AFVO 15 22.501:1 AFViI 1': 25.000 AF•✓O 17 '5,000 AP/) 18 e.,000 AFVO 19 5,000 AP/0 20 11,000 AFVI3 PI 17,7011 AFVi1 P2 27.700 AFVi P3 27,700 AFVO P4 27,700 AFViI P5 25.4011 AP/0 pr) 24,600 AP/0 A 0,700 AFViI 8 5,700 AF.r, 9,700 AFVO 5 0,700 AP/0 DIESEL UST 10,000 DIESEL OASOLIIIE 011 2,001) C.A50LINE HEATIN4 OIL 275 HEATIMi. OIL HI LF'ALILII. OIL 275 HYDPAULP: OIL H ,T,P4..0)(. 171L 275 HyDPA0LIL oft i/A2TE 'IL 1#1 275 WASTE OIL WASTE OIL #2 _175 WASTE UIL TOTAL STORAGE `OLIII.IE = 722,475 0 Faa oc DATE !1;7/11 I*AWN M.IC CHECKED TA_. SCALE. NO1 70 _LACE PLOT FLAN PROJECT NNMRPA 00`.014