The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit PL14-0023 - COSTCO - FUELING STATION SEPACOSTCO FUELING STATION 451 COSTCO DRIVE PL14-0023 L14-0035 - DR -ADMIN E14-0009 - SEPA C K LST E14-0014 - SEPA ADDENDUM E 14-0014 SEPA ADDENDUM City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Jim Haggerton, Mayor DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: E14-0009 May 21, 2014 July 2, 2014 ISSUED DNS Jack Pace, Director Applicant: Matt Cyr, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: The proposed action is to add diesel fuel to the existing Tukwila Costco fueling facility. Work for this project includes installation of one 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, along with associated site work to connect the fuel tanks to the existing fuel dispensers and to modify landscape areas to accommodate the new tanks. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: 451 Costco Drive 3623049107 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by July 16, 2014. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Jack Phe; ponsible Official City (4 iukwila 6300 Sikithcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 Date\uky\L ✓ x II— Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 0 j z City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No: E14-0009 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action is to add diesel fuel to the existing Tukwila Costco fueling facility. Work for this project includes installation of one 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one 1,500 - gallon diesel additive UST, along with associated site work to connect the fuel tanks to the existing fuel dispensers and to modify landscape areas to accommodate the new tanks. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Fuel Addition Applicant: Matt Cyr, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Location: 451 Costco Drive (parcel #3623049107) Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) The following information was considered as part of review of this application: 1. SEPA Checklist and ESA screening checklist, dated May 2014. 2. A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers and dated May 19, 2014. 3. Civil Engineering Plans and Landscape Plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington, 98188; Phone: (206) 431-3659. III. REVIEW PROCESS The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does not meet the exemptions listed under WAC 197-11-800. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL Work for this project includes installation of one 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, product piping to equip existing fuel dispensers with diesel dispensing, removal of asphalt and curbed landscape areas including removal of four trees, repaving and reconstruction of curbs, and installation of two trees, four shrubs, and groundcover within the newly curbed landscape areas. The original SEPA for construction of the Costco Fueling Facility was issued in 1997. Land use permits for the addition of the optical facility on the same parcel were submitted in 2008 and construction was completed in 2009. Barghausen Consulting Engineers applied for a design review application in 2013 for installation of additional fuel pumping islands, an extension of the canopy over the fuel pumping islands, removal of parking, and the addition of landscaping and curbing between the fueling facility and the optical facility. The applicant contacted Tukwila about permits required for the addition of diesel fuel tanks to the station after design review approval in early 2014. The SEPA checklist and an application for a Minor Modification to the design review approved by the Board of Architectural Review were submitted in May 2014. V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1-12 - Concur with checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a -h - Concur with checklist. 2. Air: a -c - Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and follow all state and federal laws related to reducing/controlling emissions to the air. 3. Water: a(1) -a(6) - Concur with checklist. b(1) -b(2) - Concur with checklist. JR Page 2 of 4 06/24/2014 H:\Design Review\Costco Gas Station\Diesel Addition SEPA & Minor Mod\SR_E14-0009_CostcoDieselAddition.doc c(1) -c(2) - Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system. The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. d - The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. 4. Plants: a- Concur with checklist. b- The landscape sheet submitted with this application shows a total of four Red Maple trees are to be removed. Two new Elm trees will be planted within the reconfigured landscape areas on the south side of the fueling facility, along with four shrubs and groundcover. c- d - Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a -b - Threatened species which are known to live in the Green and Duwamish rivers include Green/Duwamish River Summer/Fall Chinook and Newaukum Creek Summer/Fall Chinook. The watershed is also home to Fall chum, Coho and pink salmon, summer and winter steelhead, coastal cutthroat and bull trout, also listed as threatened. c -d - Concur with checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c - Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a — Concur with checklist. The applicant shall coordinate with the Tukwila Fire Department for any required permits or other requirements. (1-2) - Concur with checklist. b(1) -b(3) - The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements. Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts associated with the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a-1 - Concur with checklist. 9. Housing: a -c - Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a -c - Concur with checklist. 11. Light and Glare: a -d - Concur with checklist. JR Page 3 of 4 06/24/2014 H:\Design Review\Costco Gas Station\Diesel Addition SEPA & Minor Mod\SR_E14-0009_CostcoDieselAddition.doc 12. Recreation: a- The Green River Trail is located on the levee to the east of the site. b -c - Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c - Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: a -g - Concur with checklist. 15. Public Services: a -b - Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities:: a -b - Concur with checklist. VI. COMMENTS: No comments were received during the Notice of Application period for this project. VII. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 a Determination of Non -significance (DNS) is issued for this project. This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, technical reports, and the above Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File No. E14- 0009, and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Prepared by: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner Date: June 24, 2014 JR Page 4 of 4 06/24/2014 H:\Design Review\Costco Gas Station\Diesel Addition SEPA & Minor Mod\SR_E14-0009_CostcoDieselAddition.doc Project Name: Street Location: Municipality: Our Job No.: Engineer's Cost Estimate Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit 400 Costco Drive Tukwila, Washington 7880 • Date: 5/19/2014 Our Job No.: 7880 PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS UNIT UNIT COST BUDGET DESCRIPTION QTY TOTAL 6 -inch Curbing LF $20.00 12 $240 Base Course Crushed Rock including Placement TON $19.50 8 $156 4 -inch HMA Paving SY $20.00 28 $560 TOTAL PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS $956 FORM REVISED: 01/01/14 Page 1 of 1 7880.0C to SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND I . Name of proposed project, if applicable: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition 2. Name of Applicant: Costco Wholesale, Contact Person: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) 3. Date checklist prepared: May 21, 2014 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction of this project will begin following the environmental determination and upon approval and issuance of all required construction permits. The project will be completed in a single phase and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2014. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no proposed additions, expansions, or future activities associated. with this project. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • The Environmental Checklist prepared for the original fueling facility, dated May 20, 1997. • A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate, prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Civil Engineering Plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Landscape Plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no known pending applications or governmental approvals or other proposals directly affecting this project. 7880.008.doc Page 1 Agency Comments SEPA C%ecklIst Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Local: • City of Tukwila o Administrative Design Review - Minor Modification o Construction Permit o Public Works Permit o Underground Storage Tank Installation Permit o Electrical Permit Regional: • Puget Sound Clean Air Agency: o Notice of Construction o Permit to Operate State: • Washington Department of Ecology — Toxic Cleanup Program: o Underground Storage Tank Notification and Registration • Washington State Department of Revenue: o Business License Application Underground Storage Tank Addendum, and Weights and Measures Addendum • Washington Department of Agriculture — Weights and Measures o Placed -In -Service Report 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project includes the addition of diesel fuel to the existing Tukwila Costco fueling facility, which includes one (1) 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST), one (1) 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, product piping to equip six (6) existing fueling positions with gasoline and diesel dispensing, and associated site improvements. The USTs will be located to the south of the fueling facility. Site improvements include the replacement of pavement in the immediate area, the removal of one light standard, and a slight reduction in Landscaping. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at the existing Costco fueling facility located at 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188. Parcel number 3623049107. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (200 foot shoreline setback). A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline 7880.008.doc Page 2 k SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Useseparate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, Mountainous, other: The developed site is generally flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The overall pavement slopes in the project area are approximately 2 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,. specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the prior SEPA information, the subsurface soils at the project site consist of fill and alluvium. At a depth of 10 to 15 feet, the soil consists of sand and silts. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no observed surface indications of unstable soils at the project site. We are not aware of a history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity of the project site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The project will include the excavation of approximately 350 cubic yards of material for the new underground storage tanks and piping. Approximately 240 cubic yards will be brought on-site to maintain the subgrade and designed slope of the paved surfaces. The source of any fill will be pursuant to geotechnical engineer recommendations as approved by the City of Tukwila. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Soil erosion is possible during construction site work. Once the addition has been constructed, there is very little potential for erosion. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 86.4 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. This is an increase of approximately 319 square feet or 0.2 percent in impervious• surface. 7880.008.doc Page 3 SETA Checklist ' Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant. Responses: Agency Comments h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will be prepared. Necessary measures to limit erosion will be implemented before and during clearing and grading activity in accordance with City of Tukwila Public Works requirements, 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The addition of diesel product to the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant long-term impacts to existing air quality. During construction, there will be construction equipment exhaust that will be emitted from construction equipment. After construction, the vehicles visiting the fueling facility will generate exhaust; however, the majority of these vehicles will be from the existing traffic stream already visiting the existing Costco warehouse and fueling facility. The fueling facility presently emits gasoline vapors into the atmosphere; however, these emissions will be controlled by Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery systems approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as required by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. Diesel fuel volatility is below regulatory vapor thresholds, and is exempt from air quality requirements. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The project will continue comply with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency requirements for the site. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River (a King County Type S Aquatic Area) is approximately 200 feet from the diesel addition project. The Green River flows into the Duwamish Waterway, then Elliott Bay. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (200 foot shoreline setback). This work includes repaving/regrading associated with the diesel underground storage tank installation. The diesel underground storage tank is located outside the Urban Conservancy Environment. The limit of this work is approximately 188 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the Green River. A Shoreline 7880.008.doc Page 4 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill will be replaced or removed from surface waters or wetlands. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions will be required. 5. Does the proposal .lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is protected by a levee, According to FEMA FIRM Map No. 53033C0978F, dated May 16, 1995, the site is located within an area classified as Zone X. Zone X is described as: Areas of 500 -year flood; areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas Tess than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No change to existing. The project will not discharge waste materials into the surface waters. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Temporary dewatering may be required for installation of the underground storage tanks depending on seasonal groundwater levels. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the. following chemicals.:.; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: No change to existing. No waste materials will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water fl o w? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 7880.008.doc Page 5 0.1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary, SEPA Checkli Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Surface water runoff will continue to be collected in a series of existing catch basins and conveyed to the existing on-site private stormwater system. The under -canopy area will continue to be hydraulically isolated and convey under -canopy runoff through an oil/water separator prior to being discharged to the existing sanitary sewer system. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe, The existing water quality features will substantially limit the chance that waste materials could enter ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The existing stormwater facilities will be utilized to control and treat surface water runoff. The diesel product addition will not impact the existing system. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X Other types of vegetation: Groundcover b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A portion of the existing parking lot landscaping on the south of the fueling facility will be removed and replaced. Landscaping will be installed according to landscape plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Approximately 319 square feet of landscaping and two (2) red maples will be removed with this project. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge no threatened or endangered plant species are known to exist on or near the project. 7880.008.doc Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed replacement landscaping will be consistent with existing parking lot landscaping and be composed of drought tolerant species. Page 6 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The site has been developed as the existing Costco warehouse and fueling facility, While small animals may inhabit the open spaces of the site, to our knowledge, no threatened or endangered species have been observed on the site. King County Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed maps have identified the Green River as a known salmon bearing river. The Green River is located approximately 200 feet east of the project. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway, a known route of migratory birds, including waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed at this time. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will continue to be used to provide power to the fueling facility. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The under -canopy lighting was recently upgraded to LED lighting fixtures which reduce energy consumption. No other measures are proposed with this project. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a.. result of this proposal? If so, describe. No new environmental health hazards are introduced to the site with this project. Potential environmental health hazards include exposure to gasoline and diesel 7880.008.doc Page 7 SETA Checklist Agency Comments 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments during refueling of automobiles, risk of fire and potential for contamination of the environment by petroleum products in the unlikely event of a spill or release of fuel from the underground storage tanks, product lines, or dispensers. No other extraordinary health risks are foreseen. I. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No new special services are anticipated. The level of emergency services (fire, police, medical) would be consistent with the existing facility and other developments of this type. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The gasoline and diesel facility provides a significant number of features to reduce and control the potential for environmental health hazards. For example: • There are emergency shutoff switches located at the site in accordance with International Fire Code Standards and local requirements. • Fire extinguishers are provided in accordance with International Fire Code Standards and local requirements. • The underground storage tanks and product piping are of double- containment type construction. Tanks are of double -walled fiberglass materials, which provide protection against rupture and/or leakage. The fiberglass material helps prevent corrosive deterioration of the walls and helps prevent subsequent contamination of the surrounding soils. • The underground fuel system includes interstitial monitoring of the inner walls of the tanks and piping. This monitoring will detect any possible leaks, immediately notify the facility operator, and shut down that portion of the system with the detected leakage. • Upon installation, the system is pressure checked according to the manufacturer's specifications to detect any pressure loss and to isolate and correct any problems before covering the tanks and paving the site. • Additional primary and secondary containment equipment and spill - prevention features include overfill prevention features (OPW automatic shutoff drop tubes risers), gravity return of the un -dispensed product, flex - joints at tanks, and breakaway/impact valves at the dispensers. • The training of employees in emergency procedures helps avoid the release of fuel into the environment. Drivers are trained in transport, delivery, safety, and fuel containment procedures: Employees are trained in emergency procedures and supplied with on-site hazardous spill prevention plan and clean-up kits designed for this facility. • Stage I and II vapor recovery systems will be utilized on-site. These vapor recovery systems will reduce the amount of fuel vapor released at the time of fuel delivery to the underground storage tanks (Stage I) and at the fuel dispensers during vehicle fueling (Stage II). b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise generated in the vicinity of the site generally consists of vehicles traveling on the adjacent rights-of-way, as well as commercial activity in the surrounding area and is not anticipated to affect the project. 7880.008.doc Page 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. ,SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. What types and Levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise associated with construction activity at the project site will vary as construction progresses and depending on the equipment being used. After construction, noise will continue to be generated by automobile traffic and delivery truck traffic. These noise levels are anticipated to remain consistent. with existing ambient noise levels. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is an existing Costco Wholesale and Costco regional optical facility with a fueling facility. The adjacent properties are a mixture of commercial and industrial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. The parcel contains the existing fueling facility and Costco regional optical facility. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned TUC (Tukwila Urban Center). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation is TUC (Tukwila Urban Center). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? A portion of the site is within the Urban Conservancy Environment. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, other than a portion of the site is within the shoreline buffer or Urban Conservancy Environment. 7880.008.doc Page 9 SEPA Checklist` Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i, Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No change from existing. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No individuals will be displaced. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None are proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be designed to meet the requirements of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? No housing units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed, b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 7880.008.doc Page 10 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments During the operating evening hours, the project will continue to provide under -canopy lighting that is designed to limit glare. The facility will be closed at night and only provide safety lighting. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Due to the flat -lens of the under -canopy lighting, the project will not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The project will not be affected by existing off-site sources of Tight are glare. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Christensen Trail is located along the Green River levee adjacent to the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No recreational uses will be displaced. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None are proposed at this time. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of Historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To our knowledge, no landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance are known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed. 7880.008.doc Page 11 J 0 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist '' Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Private streets serving the site include Costco Drive and Christensen Drive. These private streets connect to Andover Park East and South 180th Street, which are both public streets. No new accesses are proposed with this project. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit does not serve the site. The closest bus stop is located 0.4 miles south along South 180th Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The overall Costco facility provides 762 parking spaces. The project will not impact existing parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads will be required. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. The fueling facility is a members -only accessory component to Costco's operation. Since approximately two (2) percent of the vehicles on the road today are powered by diesel fuel, the addition of diesel product is not anticipated to generate a significant number of additional member trips to the facility. Furthermore, peak volumes for the fueling facility occur during the midday on the weekend, which is outside of the typical commuter peaks on the transportation system. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation .impacts, if any: None are proposed because the project is a product addition to the existing fueling facility within the Costco development. While there may be a small increase in trips through the fueling facility there is no increase in the number of fueling positions, the main purpose of the project is to improve the service provided to the existing members at this location. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 7880.008.doc Page 12 , refuse service, Please respond to all questions. Use separatesheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: The project will not result in an increased need for public safety services such as police and fire protection beyond what is currently provided for the site. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity natural gas water telephone , sanitary sewer, septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The existing utilities provided to the fueling facility will serve the project. The project will include the installation of underground storage tanks that exceed 10,000 gallons and associated fueling system piping. Modifications to existing stormwater and sanitary sewer infrastructure are not anticipated. 7880.008.doc Page 13 SEPA Checklist Agency Comments • SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not applicable. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not applicable. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals; fish, or marine life? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not applicable. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 7880.008.doc Page 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not applicable. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Not applicable. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not appiicabie. D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: s--Adc.,,/ 2,0 ty rf 7880.008.doc Page 15 n O3HORELINE SETBACK ENCROACHMENT EXHIBIl° PROPOSED PIPIHG 27.61 2Y.F3 zr SAWCUT UNE -PROPOSED 1,500 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL ADDITIVE STORAGE TANK PROPOSED 15,000 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL STORAGE TANK / / 200' SETBACK FROM OHWM NEW SIGN NEW CURB NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1'-5' 0 2.5 5 10 C VICINITY MAP NTS LEGEND HATCH DENOTES UMITS OF WORK WITHIN 200' SHOREUNE SETBACK ENCROACHMENT DATA SUMMARY: ASPHALT/CONCRETE AREA: 240 SF CURBING: 12 LF m z O -g 2 o o 6• ` o3 Q UEifO U he codqP za W VERTICAL DATUM NAW 88 ROOD INFORMATION DESIGNATION OF THE 8000 ZONE 15 'X' AND DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAN ACCORDING TO IFMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 53033C0978 5, COMMUNITY NUMBER 530091 (CITY OF TUKWRA), PANEL NUMBER 978, SUFFIX 5, EFFECTIVE MAY 16, 1995, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THIS DATA IS REAFFIRMED BY FIRM MAPS NOT YET ADOPTED BUT PUBUSHED BY 1040 COUNTY FLOOD SERVICES AND RETRIEVED FROM THEIR WEBSITE ON DECEMBER 15, 2010. V AZ' N U• .! s 7,11 I Q•4 , U ' A` 14•• Know what's below. CaII before you dig. Dial 811 vcr cc ' o < 0 I s S ,7i - , i AIL!()' CONFLICT NOTE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION. DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES VMEIHER SHOWN ON THESE PIANS OR NOT BY POTHOLNG 1HE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE O 811 AND THEN POTHOUNG ALL OF THE EXISTING UNUTIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORIMRON AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR ME CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. $ 0 Date/Tme:5/16/ of Ju;F'u & Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Associated File Number (s): E14-0009 Notice of Application X Notice of Decision 0-",- Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached: DOE-SEPA (electronically) , PS Clean Air Agency, KC Assessor, Applicant, Matt Cyr, Barghausen on this 3 day of July 2014_ Project Name: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Addition Project Number: PL14-0023 Associated File Number (s): E14-0009 Mailing requested by: Jaimie Rea 's Mailer's signature: 0-",- W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTIONR OC MEMORANDUM www.tukwila@tukwilawa.gov Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Jaimie Reavis, Planner FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer David.McPherson@TukwilaWA.gov DATE: June 4, 2014 SUBJECT: Costco Fueling Facility Expansion 451 Costco Drive TL no. 362304-9107 SEPA, Design Review Minor Modification, and Miscellaneous Comments SEPA — E14-0009 Public Works has no comments. Design Review Minor Modification — L14-0035 Public Works has no comments. Miscellaneous Comments 1. Apply for a Public Works permit for grading, paving, and erosion control. As part of permit provide buoyancy calculations for the two underground tanks. 2. Future project shall comply with all BMPs for Commercial Properties (Activity Sheet A-1) and Fueling Operations (Activity Sheet A-17). Contact Greg Villanueva, NPDES Coordinator, Public Works Department (206) 431-2442 greg.villanueva@tukwilawa.gov if you have specific questions regarding these BMPs. 3. Prior to Public Works Final for the future project, provide a Spill Response Plan and describe/show the Spill Kit Location(s). Contact Greg Villanueva, NPDES Coordinator, Public Works Department (206) 431-2442 if you have questions regarding this requirement. Page 1 of 1 Cita of .J uftwiect Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: ? L I Lf - 023 c-- 14 - OL)t) • 1' ' ■ ' • . Finea • - • •(,` b'pyo , AssociatedFile Number (s): Notice of Decision x. --k ---' :-�� - - • j ie- eavis ./----- Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's signature: Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _6th day of June 2014 Project Name: Costco Fueling Expansion Project Number: PL -1-37035 ? L I Lf - 023 c-- 14 - OL)t) L14 -6D 36-- CAssociated AssociatedFile Number (s): / L43-938 1,,13 -038 j Mailing requested by: Jai j ie- eavis ./----- Mailer's signature: e /n/ D W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice of Application: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Addition Design Review Modification and SEPA/Environmental Review Location: 451 Costco Drive (tax parcel #3623049107) File #'s: E14-0009 (SEPA), L14-0035 (Design Re- view Minor Modification), PL14-0023 (Project) Applicant: Matt Cyr, Barghausen Consulting Engi- neers, Inc. Property Owner: Costco Wholesale Corporation Project Planner: Jaimie Reavis, 206-431-3659 Project Description: SEPA/Environmental Review and a Minor Modification to the Public Hearing De- sign Review for the addition of a 15,000 gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one 1,500 gallon diesel additive UST. The original design review appli- cation was approved by the Board of Architectural Review in August 2013 under file number L13-038. Comments and Appeals: The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Depart- ment of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to DCD at the address above. Writ- ten comments or requests to receive notification of the final decision on these applications must be received within 14 days of the Notice of Application; that is by 5:OOpm on Tuesday, June 24, 2014. You may request a copy of any decision and information on your appeal rights by calling 206- 431-3659. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100 Tukwila, WA. 98188 Teri Svedahl From: Teri Svedahl Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 9:59 AM To: ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov); sepa (sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov) Subject: Tukwila NOA Attachments: COSTCO.pdf; COSTCO_Checklist.pdf Attached is a Notice of Application for a modification to design review, and SEPA Environmental review, for the COSTCO Fueling project in Tukwila. If you have any questions, please contact project planner, Jaimie Reavis, at Jaimie.Reavis@TukwilaWa.gov Thank you and enjoy your weekend O Teri/ Sved a12/ Administrative Support Technician City of Tukwila - Building & Planning Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard - Ste 100 Tukwila WA 98188 Teri.Svedahl@TukwilaWA.gov SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS The City of opportunity, the community of choice. 1 AGENCY US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS US E.P.A. DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WA STATE COMMUNITY DEV KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE QWEST COMMUNICATIONS SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY BP OLYMPIC PIPELINE SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES WASTE MANAGEMENT KC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE KC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT Cultural Resources Program MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program MUCKLESHOOT Wildlife Program DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN UP COALITION PEOPLE FOR PUGET SOUND ATTN ACCOUNTING DIVISION ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY DIV JALAINE MADURA, SEPA SEATTLE SO. CONVENTION & VISITORS SEATTLE SO. CONVENTION & VISITORS Laura Murphy Karen Walter Mike Middleton SEPA REVIEW ADDRESS 4735 E MARGINAL WY S 1200 6th AVE PO 47015 PO BOX 48300 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A 23315 66th AVE S PO BOX 34023 PO BOX 90868 2319 LIND AVENUE SW PO BOX 34018 8111 -1st AVE S 14220 Interurban Ave S # 134 14220 Interurban Ave S # 134 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 4705 W MARGINAL WAY SW 1904 3rd AVENUE, STE 105 210 S Hudson Street, Ste 332 1402 - 3rd Ave, Ste 1400 'FL rc./, OCjz3 CITY ST SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA OLYMPIA WA OLYMPIA WA SEATTLE WA KENT WA SEATTLE WA BELLEVUE WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA Tukwila WA Tukwila WA AUBURN WA AUBURN WA AUBURN WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA ZIP 98124 98101 98504 98504 98104 98032 98124 98009 98055 98124 98108 98168 98168 98092 98092 98092 98106 98101 98134 98101 0 Mailing Label List Name Street Address City, St, Zip City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 Terreno 17600 WVH LLC 101 Montgomery St #200 San Francisco CA 94104 Current Tenant 17600 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17616 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17620 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17640 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17660 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17680 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Petschl's Quality Meats 1150 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Mr. and Mrs. Kohn 14915 237th Pl. SE Issaquah WA 98027 Current Tenant 1130 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Mr. Leuthold 7275 West Mercer Way Mercer Island WA 98040 Current Tenant 1120 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Prologis TLF(Andover) LLC CIO Stockbridge Capital GP, 4 Embarcadero Center 33rd FI San Francisco CA 94111 Current Tenant 1085 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1091 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1095 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1097 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1071 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1073 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1075 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1079 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1083 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1077 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 UNION PACIFIC CORP PO Box 2500 Broomfield CO 80020 Gray Cat Collective LLC C/O Shephard Com Real Estate, 1940 124th Avenue NE, Ste A101 Bellevue WA 98005 Current Tenant 1228 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Mr. KLEIN 5360 Lansdowne Ln Mercer Island WA 98040 Current Tenant 1224 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 National Beverage Corp 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Gray Cat Collective LLC C/O Shephard Com Real Estate, 1940 124th Avenue NE, Ste A101 Bellevue WA 98005 Current Tenant 1206 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1208 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1210 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Gray Cat Collective LLC C/O Shephard Com Real Estate, 1940 124th Avenue NE, Ste A101 Bellevue WA 98005 Hill Investment Company PO Box 700 Mercer Island WA 98040 Current Tenant 1201 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 United Rentals, Inc 17700 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 0 O 2014-05-20 BCE #7880 Mailing Label List Sciola Family Properties LLC 17830 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17800 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 HD Development of Maryland 6810 South 180th St Tukwila WA 98188 Sciola Family Properties LLC 17830 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17750 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 2014-05-20 0 0 BCE #7880 AGENCY LABELS (X) US Corps of Engineer ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES (X) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.)' ( ) US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) 1( X) Dept of Natural Resources_ ( ) Office of the Governor (X ) WA State Community Development ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, MillCreek Office ( ) WA Fisheries & Wildlife, Larry Fisher, 1775 12th Ave NW Ste 201, Issaquah WA 98027 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Dept of Social & Health Services ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Div. _SHORELINE NODAEQUIRfS-RETURN RECEIPT X) Dept of Ecology, SEPA **Send Electronically 0fice-of-Attorn y-Gener-al ( ) Office of Hearing Examiner cI ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( X) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources (X) KC Dept of Natural Resources,Andy Levesque ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Foster Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) Tukwila School District ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ) QWEST Communications X) Seattle City Light X) Puget Sound Energy, ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES `tee (X ),BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist (X) Seattle Public Utilities (X) Waste Management ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Section 6 CITY AGENCIES ( ) Kent Planning Dept ( ) Renton Planning Dept ( ) City of SeaTac ( ) City of Burien ( ) City of Seattle ( ) Strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council X) SW KC Chamber of Commerce (XI) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe*, r(= X): Cultural' Resources_ ( X) Fisheries Program _�( X) -Wildlife Program X)'Duwamish Indian Tribe *, Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES _ (X ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency NNN.( ) Sound Transit/SEPA (X ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition ( ) Washington Environmental Council [( X) People for Puget Sound *, ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist May 29, 2014 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Matt Cyr Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Ave S Kent, WA 98032 RE: Tukwila Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition (L14-0035; E14-0009) Dear Mr. Cyr: Your application for a Design Review Minor Modification (L14-0035) and SEPA/Environmental Review (E14-0009) for the property located at 451 Costco Drive in Tukwila is considered complete on May 29, 2014 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. It is our understanding that Fast Signs will be manufacturing and installing the public notice board for this project. The City of Tukwila will coordinate the public notice mailing with installation of the public notice board within the next 14 days. Once the public notice board is installed, the public comment period for this project will be 14 days. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at Jaimie.Reavis@TukwilaWA„gov or (206) 431-3659. Sincerely, Jaimie Reavis Assistant Planner sPc(44/14- 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington. 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206- 431-3665 0400 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E14-0009 (SEPA) L14-0035 (Design Review Minor Modification) PL14-0023 (Project) LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: S3uilding WIPlanning Public Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. In Parks/Rec Project: Costco Fueling Facility — SEPA and Design Review Modification to install one 15,000 gallon diesel UST and one 1,500 gallon diesel additive UST Address: 451 Costco Drive Date transmitted: May 28, 2014 Response requested by: June 11, 2014 Staff coordinator: Jaimie Reavis Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: ��n// (a- m Comments prepared by: ' Update date: 0400 City of Tukwila r CEIVF! Department of Community Development MAY 282014 1 umNIOFtKS PUBIC File Number E14-0009 (SEPA) L14-0035 (Design Review Minor Modification) PL14-0023 (Project) LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: 1®1 Building IN Planning Public Works ® Fire Dept. Police Dept. 110 Parks/Rec Project: Costco Fueling Facility — SEPA and Design Review Modification to install one 15,000 gallon diesel UST and one 1,500 gallon diesel additive UST Address: 451 Costco Drive Date transmitted: May 28, 2014 Response requested by: June 11, 2014 Staff coordinator: Jaimie Reavis Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) (StE. Ac-tA6-t. 4 - 'TRA T .) m c opyt ret. i, S "hub 6/* Plan check date: Comments " Update date: prepared by: 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E14-0009 (SEPA) L14-0035 (Design Review Minor Modification) PL14-0023 (Project) LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works e Dept. ❑I Police Dept. In Parks/Rec Project: Costco Fueling Facility — SEPA and Design Review Modification to install one 15,000 gallon diesel UST and one 1,500 gallon diesel additive UST Address: 451 Costco Drive Date transmitted: May 28, 2014 Response requested by: June 11, 2014 Staff coordinator: Jaimie Reavis Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) o Lor c & - v, s s rnN. Plan check date: 12t e.4 Comments prepared by 5 Update date: Minnie Dhaliwal Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila Community Development -2- May 21, 2014 8. One (1) Parcel Radius Map 9. Five (5) copies of the Project Narrative and Design Review Justification 10. One (1) copy of the original SEPA checklist for the fueling facility 11. Five (5) copies of Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and five (5) copies Engineer's Cost Estimate prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, dated May 19, 2014. 12. Five (5) copies of the Land Use Site Plan (24" x 36") prepared by MulvannyG2 Architecture, dated May 8, 2014. 13. Five (5) copies of the Conceptual Landscape Plan (24" x 36") prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated May 20, 2014. 14. Five (5) copies of the Diesel Grading and Drainage Exhibit (24" x 36") prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated May 20, 2014. 15. Five (5) copies of the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey (24" x 36") prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 2, 2013 (including Sensitive Areas) Please complete your review as soon as possible. Please contact me (425) 251-6222 if you have any questions or comments. Thank you for your review of this application. Respectfully, Matt Cyr, LEED AP Project Planner MC/kb/jm 7880c.013.doc enc: As Noted cc: David H Rogers, Costco Wholesale Ed Galliway, MulvannyG2 Architecture (w/ enc.) Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Chris Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Chris Tebaldi, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mailing Label List Parcel number Name Street Address City, St, Zip 2523049016 City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 2523049017 Terreno 17600 WVH LLC 101 Montgomery St #200 San Francisco CA 94104 Current Tenant 17600 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17616 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17620 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17640 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17660 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17680 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 2523049057 COSTCO WHOLESALE Not Applicable 2523049063 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIO Not Applicable 2623049089 Petschl's Quality Meats 1150 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 2623049091 Mr. and Mrs. Kohn 14915 237th PI. SE Issaquah WA 98027 Current Tenant 1130 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 2623049098 Mr. Leuthold 7275 West Mercer Way Mercer Island WA 98040 Current Tenant 1120 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 2623049106 Prologis TLF(Andover) LLC C/0 Stockbridge Capital GP, 4 Embarcadero Center 33rd FI San Francisco CA 94111 Current Tenant 1085 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1091 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1095 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1097 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1071 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1073 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1075 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1079 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1083 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1077 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 2623049113 UNION PACIFIC CORP PO Box 2500 Broomfield CO 80020 3523049070 Gray Cat Collective LLC C/O Shephard Com Real Estate, 1940 124th Avenue NE, Ste A101 Bellevue WA 98005 Current Tenant 1228 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 3523049071 Mr. KLEIN 5360 Lansdowne Ln Mercer Island WA 98040 Current Tenant 1224 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 3523049072 National Beverage Corp 1227 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 3523049075 Gray Cat Collective LLC C/O Shephard Com Real Estate, 1940 124th Avenue NE, Ste A101 Bellevue WA 98005 Current Tenant 1206 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1208 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 1210 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 3523049077 Gray Cat Collective LLC C/0 Shephard Com Real Estate, 1940 124th Avenue NE, Ste A101 Bellevue WA 98005 3523049089 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIO Not Applicable 3523049091 Hill Investment Company PO Box 700 Mercer Island WA 98040 Current Tenant 1201 Andover Park East Tukwila WA 98188 3623049016 City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 3623049057 United Rentals, Inc 17700 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 3623049060 Sciola Family Properties LLC 17830 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17800 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 3623049074 HD Development of Maryland 6810 South 180th St Tukwila WA 98188 3623049097 Sciola Family Properties LLC 17830 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 Current Tenant 17750 West Valley Hwy Tukwila WA 98188 3623049107 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP Not Applicable 2014-05-20 BCE #7880 CITYIUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 RECEIVED MAY 2 1 2014 SEPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR STAFF USE. ONLY' Planner : ' File Number: • Receipt Number: ,.,`,, ._ ' :' - _ ° Cross-reference files: Applicant notified of incbmiilete application:: Y .. . Applicantatotif€ed of c©mplete:application ; -' ,Notice of: application iesued r . } ` A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: SourileisirEA ee5reca 6 s Sr2 reo l B. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (address and accessors parcel number(s)) 11'J/ 54x on/ )7Rnic , Tu/G i , iz' 9e/88 tlss� � PA2e.eL_ 36.? 3ozi- glo7_ Quarter: iV& Section: 36 Township: 023A7 Range: 6WE. (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FaL44urOM4r J, FUL-E1-/,(36 Me.l .i ry CDR, ' (c 57-60 j✓/ tit t3��? S 8r L e4rp1) in/ T, LeJr PF IA e s%Ge) ep7? l6 8u//bJ'3 D. APPLICANT: NAME: C )$ % C -C) IO,/ SAc eeiep . , Mac/A/A/y 77Ael 2V6..S%l/P ADDRESS: SIGNATURE: A/riiil1/i9 (.g5)?/3-60/a DATE: J - / 9' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist ,asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attached any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should read as "propose, "proposer", and "affected geographic area", respectively. .crol No. Epic File No. Fee $ 325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: YOuT/iICENriE2 00sTe-0 4s 5/3770.'/ 2. Name of applicant: Cosnc'.o 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: qqq L ek; T»2,, .�ss4car-A1 At 9&O7 cc,/rrfIT: is;� 0/.2.5)3/3-63/a 4. Date checklist prepared: „1/1f/1f1 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): P PAs'nth' c.) 0/7 APPi '14 / 040 s r2st vrio/C) `rd ;4 6 AOLEx=,g°s t3ti !t)e/;L,/ sgfrr. 14A)1) ,7k'c:,1; Z9`99. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. A/ d . /1.7- Pg gg'r,t ")T . a41.4.775 ruL <.•04) S PA d.h- s 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. .4.— / ) . 24 JL Pt e,peiAlA)b S'%U/,/#'&F> rl4Jk:5 ,2)/LL TSE. P2 •r`'•{,26 1 i ♦ • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A4,7' ,v 1e& li1FAPAV�• -2- 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. f'(L/ig)Pr eNJr 5i2/' DevCzoY / -) r N/r Elie �r cuar/o/i/ codre L j%wefier 4P?d ' L, G SM//F&N01. i0 ML/lF�/1'LTI /tivf c�GfI. PPf"f' �/h! �� -1/1/U16 /Alsrlitbei nou 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. P vis? .r_oF A Ft-az/ 4aro/lt,/rgb .gicjj G F.4 ,L/i/`/ .oig• G'oSi eo iV 'meta LG._ 3 Tst.4/vAs sc9/r/L/ 46ts,14by 6.. 7isi vssgs cid ; 4 C-4n/o1�/, 4 ib 4 ti x8 0 -6/v7 -get ZNeG05'/ g_,--01.10usE, •r0 pi r:_E.c,3 ;� r, . /_ 1,4 ,- 1 ,U/ o e,nr,� /s 7Ze Fb i.. d1pikFiur- , (4 4y/),236=Tr- G/ 7 D AF. in(. _ Gf4/bFP. 6a) /JAv b 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. / . 1 at /& ('o T ' 's ik4-lry f4.c (Lc ry , NO2i IAF fife/G/77 13. Does the proposal lie within'an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? °;z //eilz_c_Ai Au E., 1 i -34-e,4...044 r/16,(&EE. 3J/ LLF 4 e,,L, P4 t E/ Red) Pelt f �'� 7"�f� - E O F A7', -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3-44% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, s•ecify them and note any prime farmland. 1 L C/ Ni 1 ' �'i Lt »ID A-14.4.4 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ' - bnil != -rte 1. SIL p I,+ Va��V_, e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. A/« v/. 1,.4-A1/n5e, P4.0 PoS 1ID Y/3Tin) 6 T'1. de:/fie bpi—, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g• About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? _1f 2C//4A. F. /it) 4/e4,11- ilii SC%ie?fide F. f/eeQv'i 6X/51//h-)iso (A.0b/77tih'14 -4- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impact to the earth, if any: 9 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Lo u�.�P✓t2. 75: Al f;Yc/p I4 294) ' VQKJS//Lila! ILII05 I s .5//05 diJIGG fr,V D 5141E, " 7 "err' eau/ b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. der 44wv C 4-0y c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: _ 4PP 2 iF A O4s L./ )& D/5 5/00CI J LI 1, nvi WI ) 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. aLE ed fi/ 1/EA ft PW -0X, fp 1 Fi,, -5- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. c'ut)1 APp;eox4 f pi; ; fi / 1 a,2 1() Ea/Me, 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 0 /44- 02 g A tit o�� t ty2evti 1"1MCr/FG2.6 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. AO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site p l an. % /1.o (t)s E7-4-iv/e-• /A)ST/ a4 re J . fidxt//ZF:-S F D0-u)E. PE I Ir 6) Does the proposal waste materials to describe the type volume of discharge. involve any discharges of surface waters? If so, of waste and anticipated -6- b. Ground: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. _, 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 001v c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. le,//0,42P 4/UP J/A.Qt' "-wit ) DFt---iv a b/Go//4/ 6 NZ� Si0 ��T S7 1. -7- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. )t//if d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground,, and runoff water impacts, if any: IVO 7/1/6e Z ?4 i /�Ai xrnJ r r7F ,524,, 1C/t • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: V deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation OM/tit/FA.),7- 44-44)0se.44PlA.I6 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 7 Sc/ -7 Aso A90 ,(3,1-4 Loss O__,?..Q.a1) se,"pp ( c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. nADSiT -8- d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 44,8 Sa cuLzt2s cT y 445E v v swE 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagl , other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: �O ti osS224!-� fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 4.) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. �} d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: —757437071E--- -9- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. /g enu6: 4.) p y' f'`37 ,f- 015 PF 451 / J 0 / se4.,_ ot1 a. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. AJ -d c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Drs ,E s 1) Describe special be required. emergency services that might G�C—r2 L is f% face__ 14/51/11-P. F//?- i2cTEfl 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: NO.0/70/ -(1<i4_ .s iS7S 1S, ) / /u.? VIDI O / /v/Tr) 1C( Fanoti O )5rCc i&/,l/ 'rbcs E'/ 1 HSN _ FARE. rx riick�ur�sflEr� 7'" 1Si/1:UMJ �e Sr I se9tie'& )4 Eb 77f,‹),C51 PiImU ei 5emt /35, -10- Ir... Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ,o 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 7-44-FPI6 .L/} f L9c3/ C41 s mss) ewe, •3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: PrabY/ bE, gr-piisi gA)-r aiReilt-lintDAS 70 2-*. 71:A./ AO a,-ri,t-r 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ph,moi CS t��.-�� PAtIE- 45 P/1—L /AJ th Fe4 Ce)37 P7 ic7'4c. P-1Ar_ . s . �»/_-exo" Pae Ti E 5 /�. ('C%5TCL> 6156 —:27c) �s M Ale- ! T J._4 r2/ (i iU rn1� « b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. QJCT rW/ti) Pis' 1 5 yEnies, c. Describe any structures on the site. AMA) pti 7/ Pe��«� e4 ti / /C5- 6 15 /6�-4 iF ()A) 7,.E44/7/_e, 73-free*'I. 0E -(44Q. -11- c c� d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? u C i �1,c'%vic,4 11246# JJ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? (3cHat EQei, _ g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? 'O4:5°/4i2,6S.44E, SE i 6g Zk' cu e -73U4-) YoF h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ___510 PE -4, 6k9s7iro pw7wFss Approximately ,how many people would the completed project displace? Q)Dt.)� J. Evaluation for Agency Use Only k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: C- uA Ti¢3Ga D esj 6,,c) G'/PN/ T�ekj -12- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. 1/4 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? /77L—CZY...1 F72e) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? oi-77 e ( r// J)/ iC Ax.) it,r) QGoCle- 4F - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: (10A415 7-266-1EL_IIEZ3/6 -13- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ate c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?_4217,0 �. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Doo i ifie G?- PG l'e'i /'0 C4 itYcPy Frxr,Cc__,S 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? 7/- i 4 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. JO -S c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: -14- 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on ornext to the site? If so, generally describe. AC? b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: �. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. nee..Es5 i6 y AMy of 5Wok) AS Re/ ?ATP, SrieE .T ,i?c(NIv/Ai COS i Cc_> 4 L Z Clu 6 t) prisol• b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? • i 7 t •8101( , /(I/1)&0 II/( & c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? rtiM. �MIT .�2 0 ?/ sPi -eEs Nobs Qj> T7'/ ate8 tr5 e T -15- 16. Utilities a. C' - tilities currentlylable .-the;t � natu al .as j refuse serve" a -t , sanitary sewe b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. rOSSJ & -y 4-,v 4 Z>n i 770,04IL'G-cL ra T 2 r'AC7/U DE ® 5E&i'I E s, C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila -Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? /ae t- e 0o.J r'wv T'• Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: T ,b S e 1 r i •V%i 2. Jul/SSJ/4P _A101 -D:20. 0; lS, Pao Po- -is Limit/r T/f Fog. 00,0F1.../87:5 , _ -23- CosTco WHOLESAL COSTCO GASOLINE The proposed project is the development of a fully automated, self serve fueling station for members only as an accessory use to the existing Costco. The proposed station inchides 3 islands with 2 double sided gasoline dispensers each, allowing for 12 automobile fueling positions. Each fuel hose shall be installed with a break -away device that will stop the flow of fuel at both ends when pulled from the dispenser. The facility would be covered by a canopy with color and signage to coordinate with the main Costco building. The computerized controller, which runs the payment, dispensing, and turbine activation systems, is housed by a 6 ft. by 8 ft. steel unit painted to coordinate with the Costco building colors. The enclosure houses the TLS350 fuel system monitor and main power sub -panel. Fuel is to be stored in 3 double walled fiberglass underground storage tanks. Gasoline dispensing is activated by debit or credit payment card, no cash is accepted at the islands. Except for daily start up at opening and shut down at closing, the facility is designed to operate without manpower. However, the station will be opened only when employees are on duty at the Costco and regular maintenance checks will be made throughout the day. A video monitor, direct phone, and alarm systems connect the gas station to the main facility. The TLS350 monitor system to be installed includes a leak detection system which provides positive shutdown of the flow of gasoline if a loss of pressure or leak is detected. An emergency shut-off switch which is wired directly into the main Costco building, will be installed on the control enclosure unit and on a canopy column so that immediate notification will take place should the emergency switch be activated. The fueling facility will be equipped with a spill clean-up kit and an emergency response plan located in the control enclosure. All equipment to be installed is of the latest technology to prevent environmental mishaps and will be installed by professionals in the field according to code or better than code requirements. The gas station is proposed as an added benefit to our members by providing a fast, convenient alternative to purchase gasoline at a fair price. undated 5/2/97 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 1 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). 1 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". 1 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. 1 PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: To be completed 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 1 7. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. 1 8. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. H:\Land Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc Cheek items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 1 9. Vicinity Map with site location. N / A 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. ✓ 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". H:U.and Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 53 REVIEW E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov 0\1 APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: 1=-) a,l013 P ketkViLS File Number: El(-- °cog Application Complete Date: V21 /2_0 /v Project File Number: pcI %._ 6,,..... 3 Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3623049107 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: (425) 251-6222 FAX: (425) 251-8782 E-mail: mcyr@barghausen.com Signature: Date: 05/12/2014 H:Vand Use Applications In PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.Doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenler Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX.• (206) 431-3665 E-mail: pkmning(r),Tukwilall'A.Rov AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at Issaquah WA ( ( (state), on ' 1 , 20 13 ss city), (Print Name) BagaraiRogows Vz1v14 H ejlottyir 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027 (Address) (425) ! - F7OD (Phone Number) (Signature)' On this day personally appeared before me '0'? J l d F\ CSO -r S to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed t ie s me as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. j 1 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS , 7�-i DAY OFdL'��Ii ! , 20 Z JENNIFER J. SPAOAFORA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEM3 =R 19. 2013 -4 Avv NOT residing (a P IC i(1/and fo e Qf, / hire sidinat , (,1j My Commission expires on H:1Land Use Applications in PURDesign Review -Public Hearing-Jan2011.doc City tukwila ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 05/12/2014 Applicant Name: Street Address: 999 Lake Drive City, State, Zip: Issaquah, WA 98027 Costco Wholesale Telephone: DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. H:\ and Use Applications in PDF1SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 1 Citytpkwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 1 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete 1 YES — Checklist Complete H:U.and Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 2 City'ukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-3 1 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) 1 YES - Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) 1 YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 3 City'ukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) 1 YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. INO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. If NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 Cityt'ukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. if NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. It NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 H:\Land Use Applications in PDFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 5 City filtiVukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) H:\Land Use Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.doe Page 6 SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition 2. Name of Applicant: Costco Wholesale. Contact Person: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) 3. Date checklist prepared: May 21, 2014 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction of this project will begin following the environmental determination and upon approval and issuance of all required construction permits. The project will be completed in a single phase and is expected to be completed in 2014. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no proposed additions, expansions, or future activities associated with this project. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • The Environmental Checklist prepared for the original fueling facility, dated May 20, 1997. • A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate, prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Civil Engineering Plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Landscape Plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no known pending applications or governmental approvals or other proposals directly affecting this project. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 1 Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Local: • City of Tukwila o Administrative Design Review - Minor Modification o Construction Permit o Public Works Permit o Underground Storage Tank Installation Permit o Electrical Permit Regional: • Puget Sound Clean Air Agency: o Notice of Construction o Permit to Operate State: • Washington Department of Ecology — Toxic Cleanup Program: o Underground Storage Tank Notification and Registration • Washington State Department of Revenue: o Business License Application — Underground Storage Tank Addendum, and Weights and Measures Addendum • Washington Department of Agriculture — Weights and Measures o Placed -In -Service Report 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project includes the addition of diesel fuel to the existing Tukwila Costco fueling facility, which includes one (1) 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST), one (1) 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, product piping to equip six (6) existing multi- product dispensers with gasoline and diesel dispensing, and associated site improvements. The USTs will be located to the south of the fueling facility. Site improvements include the replacement of pavement in the immediate area, the removal of one light standard, and a slight reduction in landscaping. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at the existing Costco fueling facility located at 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188. Parcel number 3623049107. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (200 foot shoreline setback). A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 2 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The developed site is generally flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The overall pavement slopes in the project area are approximately 2 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime faiiiiland. According to the prior SEPA information, the subsurface soils at the project site consist of fill and alluvium. At a depth of 10 to 15 feet, the soil consists of sand and silts. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no observed surface indications of unstable soils at the project site. We are not aware of a history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity of the project site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The project will include the excavation of approximately 350 cubic yards of material for the new underground storage tanks and piping. Approximately 240 cubic yards will be brought on-site to maintain the subgrade and designed slope of the paved surfaces. The source of any fill will be pursuant to geotechnical engineer recommendations as approved by the City of Tukwila. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Soil erosion is possible during construction site work. Once the addition has been constructed, there is very little potential for erosion. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 86.4 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. This is an increase of approximately 319 square feet or 0.2 percent in impervious surface. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 3 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will be prepared. Necessary measures to limit erosion will be implemented before and during clearing and grading activity in accordance with City of Tukwila Public Works requirements. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The addition of diesel product to the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant long-term impacts to existing air quality. During construction, there will be construction equipment exhaust that will be emitted from construction equipment. After construction, the vehicles visiting the fueling facility will generate exhaust; however, the majority of these vehicles will be from the existing traffic stream already visiting the existing Costco warehouse and fueling facility. The fueling facility presently emits gasoline vapors into the atmosphere; however, these emissions will be controlled by Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery systems approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as required by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. Diesel fuel volatility is below regulatory vapor thresholds, and is exempt from air quality requirements. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The project will continue comply with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency requirements for the site. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River (a King County Type S Aquatic Area) is approximately 200 feet from the diesel addition project. The Green River flows into the Duwamish Waterway, then Elliott Bay. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (200 foot shoreline setback). This work includes diesel product pipe installation, and repaving/regrading associated with the diesel underground storage tank installation. The diesel underground storage tank is located outside the Urban Conservancy Environment. The limit of this work is approximately 188 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 4 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Green River. A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill will be replaced or removed from surface waters or wetlands. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions will be required. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is protected by a levee. According to FEMA FIRM Map No. 53033C0978F, dated May 16, 1995, the site is located within an area classified as Zone X. Zone X is described as: Areas of 500 -year flood; areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No change to existing. The project will not discharge waste materials into the surface waters. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Temporary dewatering may be required for installation of the underground storage tanks depending on seasonal groundwater levels. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: No change to existing. No waste materials will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water fl o w ? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 5 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Surface water runoff will continue to be collected in a series of existing catch basins and conveyed to the existing on-site private stormwater system. The under -canopy area will continue to be hydraulically isolated and convey under -canopy runoff through an oil/water separator prior to being discharged to the existing sanitary sewer system. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The existing water quality features will substantially limit the chance that waste materials could enter ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The existing stormwater facilities will be utilized to control and treat surface water runoff. The diesel product addition will not impact the existing system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X Other types of vegetation: Groundcover b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A portion of the existing parking lot landscaping on the south of the fueling facility will be removed and replaced. Landscaping will be installed according to landscape plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Approximately 319 square feet of landscaping and two (2) red maples will be removed with this project. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge no threatened or endangered plant species are known to exist on or near the project. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed replacement landscaping will be consistent with existing parking lot landscaping and be composed of drought tolerant species. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The site has been developed as the existing Costco warehouse and fueling facility. While small animals may inhabit the open spaces of the site, to our knowledge, no threatened or endangered species have been observed on the site. King County Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed maps have identified the Green River as a known salmon bearing river. The Green River is located approximately 200 feet east of the project. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway, a known route of migratory birds, including waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed at this time. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will continue to be used to provide power to the fueling facility. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The under -canopy lighting was recently upgraded to LED lighting fixtures which reduce energy consumption. No other measures are proposed with this project. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No new environmental health hazards are introduced to the site with this project. Potential environmental health hazards include exposure to gasoline and diesel during refueling of automobiles, risk of fire and potential for contamination of the environment by petroleum products in the unlikely event of a spill or release of fuel from the underground storage tanks, product lines, or dispensers. No other extraordinary health risks are foreseen. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No new special services are anticipated. The level of emergency services (fire, police, medical) would be consistent with the existing facility and other developments of this type. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The gasoline and diesel facility provides a significant number of features to reduce and control the potential for environmental health hazards. For example: • There are emergency shutoff switches located at the site in accordance with International Fire Code Standards and local requirements. • Fire extinguishers are provided in accordance with International Fire Code Standards and local requirements. • The underground storage tanks and product piping are of double - containment type construction. Tanks are of double -walled fiberglass materials, which provide protection against rupture and/or leakage. The fiberglass material helps prevent corrosive deterioration of the walls and helps prevent subsequent contamination of the surrounding soils. • The underground fuel system includes interstitial monitoring of the inner walls of the tanks and piping. This monitoring will detect any possible leaks, immediately notify the facility operator, and shut down that portion of the system with the detected leakage. • Upon installation, the system is pressure checked according to the manufacturer's specifications to detect any pressure loss and to isolate and correct any problems before covering the tanks and paving the site. • Additional primary and secondary containment equipment and spill - prevention features include overfill prevention features (OPW automatic shutoff drop tubes risers), gravity return of the un -dispensed product, flex - joints at tanks, and breakaway/impact valves at the dispensers. • The training of employees in emergency procedures helps avoid the release of fuel into the environment. Drivers are trained in transport, delivery, safety, and fuel containment procedures. Employees are trained in emergency procedures and supplied with on-site hazardous spill prevention plan and clean-up kits designed for this facility. • Stage I and II vapor recovery systems will be utilized on-site. These vapor recovery systems will reduce the amount of fuel vapor released at the time of fuel delivery to the underground storage tanks (Stage I) and at the fuel dispensers during vehicle fueling (Stage ll). b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise generated in the vicinity of the site generally consists of vehicles traveling on the adjacent rights-of-way, as well as commercial activity in the surrounding area and is not anticipated to affect the project. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 8 c� O Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise associated with construction activity at the project site will vary as construction progresses and depending on the equipment being used. After construction, noise will continue to be generated by automobile traffic and delivery truck traffic. These noise levels are anticipated to remain consistent with existing ambient noise levels. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is an existing Costco Wholesale and Costco regional optical facility with a fueling facility. The adjacent properties are a mixture of commercial and industrial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. The parcel contains the existing fueling facility and Costco regional optical facility. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned TUC (Tukwila Urban Center). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation is TUC (Tukwila Urban Center). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? A portion of the site is within the Urban Conservancy Environment. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, other than a portion of the site is within the shoreline buffer or Urban Conservancy Environment. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No change from existing. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 9 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No individuals will be displaced. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None are proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be designed to meet the requirements of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? No housing units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? During the operating evening hours, the project will continue to provide under -canopy lighting that is designed to limit glare. The facility will be closed at night and only provide safety lighting. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 10 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Due to the flat -lens of the under -canopy lighting, the project will not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The project will not be affected by existing off-site sources of light are glare. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Christensen Trail is located along the Green River levee adjacent to the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No recreational uses will be displaced. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None are proposed at this time. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To our knowledge, no landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance are known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Private streets serving the site include Costco Drive and Christensen Drive. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 11 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments These private streets connect to Andover Park East and South 180th Street, which are both public streets. No new accesses are proposed with this project. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit does not serve the site. The closest bus stop is located 0.4 miles south along South 180th Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The overall Costco facility provides 762 parking spaces. The project will not impact existing parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads will be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. The fueling facility is a members -only accessory component to Costco's operation. Since approximately two (2) percent of the vehicles on the road today are powered by diesel fuel, the addition of diesel product is not anticipated to generate a significant number of additional member trips to the facility. Furthermore, peak volumes for the fueling facility occur during the midday on the weekend, which is outside of the typical commuter peaks on the transportation system. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are proposed because the project is a product addition to the existing fueling facility within the Costco development. While there may be a small increase in trips through the fueling facility there is no increase in the number of fueling positions, the main purpose of the project is to improve the service provided to the existing members at this location. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will not result in an increased need for public safety services such as police and fire protection beyond what is currently provided for the site. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 12 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity', natural gas, water refuse service telephone sanitary sewer , septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The existing utilities provided to the fueling facility will serve the project. The project will include the installation of underground storage tanks that exceed 10,000 gallons and associated fueling system piping. Modifications to existing stormwater and sanitary sewer infrastructure are not anticipated. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 13 SEPA Checklist Agency Comments Chr) SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not applicable. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not applicable. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not applicable. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime faiadands? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 14 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not applicable. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Not applicable. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not applicable. D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: c- e Date Submitted: /z/2..�l c/ 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 15 500 foot radius map Project Name: Street Location: Municipality: Our Job No.: Engineer's Cost Estimate Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit 400 Costco Drive Tukwila, Washington 7880 Date: 5/19/2014 Our Job No.: 7880 PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST BUDGET QTY TOTAL 6 -inch Curbing 'LF $20.00 12 $240 Base Course Crushed Rock including Placement TON $19.50 8 $156 4 -inch HMA Paving SY $20.00 28 $560 TOTAL PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS $956 FORM REVISED: 01/01/14 Page 1 of 1 7880.008 0 SHORELINE SETBACK ENCROACHMENT EXHIBIT (3 cG. PROPOSED PIPING 200' SETBACK FROM OHWM 27.61 263 SAWCUT UNE NEW SKIN NEW CURB —PROPOSED 1.500 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL A00111vE STORAGE TANK PROPOSED 15,000 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL STORAGE TANK 0 NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT T-5 0 2.5 5 10 8 COSTCO SITE Sr v, EYHIONWAY ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP firs LEGEND HATCH DENOTES WITS OF WORK WENN 200' SHOREUNE SETBACK ENCROACHMENT DATA SUMMARY: ASPHALT/CONCRETE AREA: 240 SF CURBING: 12 LF VERTICAL DATUM NAW 88 .4 1 z Fri zO circ c0 3 7Q0 U U war ROOD INFORMATION DESIGNATION OF 711E FLOOD ZONE IS N. AND DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR 91002 PLAIN ACCORDING TO FEMA ROOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 5303300978 F, COMMUNITY NUMBER 530091 (CITY OF TUKWILA), PANEL NUMBER 978, SUFFIX F, EFFECTIVE MAY 18, 1995, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THIS DATA IS REAFFIRMED BY 0RM MMS NOT YET ADOPTED BUT PUBUSHED BY KING COUNTY ROOD SERVICES AND RETRIEVED FROM THEIR WEBSITE ON DECEMBER 15, 2010. Know what's below. Call before you dig. Dial 811 LL Ti _- I Si $ =IN CONFLICT NOM THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PUNS OR NOT BY POTHOLING 711E UTI.RIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 811 AND THEN POTHOUNG ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PITOCALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PIANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIAT109. IF CONFUCTS SHOULD OCCUR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOOFY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEIAS PR10R TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 20 0 z 4 OCVW Z WWW 1 1 V 3In N N NN7 N Z N N W Y vv r File:P:\07000s\7880\e.mea\7eeo—se 0 10 20 40 MIME 11 DIESEL - CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE FUEL FACILITY ADDITION 400 COSTCO DRIVE, TUKWILA, WA 91406 COSTCO FACILITY NO. 6 COSTING TREE FROM 2014 EXPANSION TO REMAIN TYPICAL IX. CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE I Hi, IiL I c \ ,il i, 11 Imo. _ , .; , A, PROPOSED I. - `f!. PRQPOSED UNDERGROUND 4:-. ' DIESEL STORAGE TANK LUf.T OF WORK i~ _+TIT. --_ _ T=___-_._.._.. -, moo... .... ` _:' SICAL 41744 " So,P.9 ..Da BE MOVED T TYPICAL LMifi OF TO W RK RET EXISTING TREE 0 jam' ...__.___ L -+ S 38'2715" E 302.95" 1,7{ COSTCO SITE -' ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY NOT TO SCALE GRE WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY Rio VICINITY MAP NTS LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SIZE SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMES CONDITION SPACING I o TREES: ULMUS PARNFIXIA .0.1-M r / ABLE ELM EXISTING TREE 2• CA. 8 & 8 CALIPER SHOWN AS SHOWN 2 AS SHOWN { \, NEW TREE PER 2014 EXPANSION PLANS 2• CALIPER AS SHOWN 10 EXISTING TREE CAPER 4 SHOW SHRUBS: OSMANTNUS 0616448 / .30. -W AS SHOWN 4 ® DELAVA0 OSMMRHUS GROUNDCOVERS: . '.>,t• ' _ M VING MINOR / DWMP PERWANKuu 4• POT 8. 0.C. A5 REO'O P:.:..:. j EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRITATION EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION t✓ 1 STAKE & GUY ONE GROWING SEASON; NURSERY GROWN FOR STREET 1068 USE, BRANCHED AT 6• TO ROMAN. SAVE, AND PROTECT TO REM461, SAVE, AND PROTECT TO BE 020068D MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM, FULL AND BUSIED PLANTED WITHIN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO FILL W OPEN AREAS HOLD 10• ER011 BORDERS, SHRUBS, AND TREES TO REMAIN. SAVE. AND PROTECT TO BE REMOVED a. a. Uz o J 0 5 ?L0< w U O J z u- 3 o Y Oo W 1- U_ co LL o Q STATE OF WASH NGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARGHITEr URG. SMOEL CERTIFICATE N0. 106 ('NACHO GOL'ivATH541101UR EXPIRES, 12/15/14 Know what's below. Call before you dig. w L12A.;i LIMY COWUCT NOTE; cow, „.„40+ o .0 THE CONIPACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE 1008110N, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING 010311ES WHETHER SHOWN 3N THESE PLANS OR NOT 8Y POTHOLING THE MUTES MID SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING 11181TY LOCATE 0 811 AND THEN POTHO5NG ALL OF THE EXISTING MUTES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW URTY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARLATION. IF CONFUCTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. \ engineering \2074 Diesel Expansion \7880—DIES I it 4 DIESEL GRADING AND DRAINAGE EXHIBIT =ro f 11 -,01 0 5 10 20 0 • SAWCUT UNE NE 4, I .1 :81419, e WOVE EX. TRUE, r� -� 200' SETBACK FROM 0HWM 27,41. Mf 2. JAE 502 �` MATCH EX. 27.56 � MSE SAWCUT UNE NEW SIGN EX. CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE ti y '6 274t `27.45 SAWCU7 LINE NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT SAWCUT- UNE 27.54 GUARD POST, TYP 27.84— PROPOSED 15,000 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL STORAGE TMa( RELOCATE EX. LOT LIGHT REMOVE EX. CURB '--PROPOSED 1,500 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL ADDITIVE STORAGE TANK 22.41 ME 27.49 2 1 NEW CURB -NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT 44 18 COSTCO SITE -i ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY RE WESTVALLEY HIGHWAY N Vi NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP NTS DISTURBED AREA SUMMARY TOTAL AREA . 2.826 SF EXISTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 2,451 SF 2.770 5F PERVIOUS: 375 SF 56 SF EARTHWORK OUANTTTIES CUT= 350 CU. YDS FILL- 240 CU. YDS EXPORT. 110 CU. YDS IMPORT. 0 CU. YDS VERTICAL DATUM MVO 88 X w w z cc 0 z z 0 5 J a 8 FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION 0 c 0< to Q 0 -I 0 o ]G ROOD INFORMATION DESIGNATION OF THE FLOOD ZONE IS "X" AND DETERMINED TO 8E OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 5303300978 1', COMMUNITY NUMBER 530091 (CITY OF TUKWIIA). PANEL NUMBER 978, SUFFIX F, EFFECTIVE MAY 16, 1995, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THIS DATA IS REAFFIRMED BY FIRM MAPS NOT YET ADOPTED BUT PUBLISHED BY KING COUNTY FLOOD SERVICES AND RETRIEVED FROM THEIR WE85ITE ON DECEMBER 15, 2010. Know what's below. CatI before you dig. Dial 811 1 1 COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 o ^ 8 UnlfY CONUCT NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION. AND DEPTH OF`;tY.i EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHOLING THE U1ILRIE5 SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCL DE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 511 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NO7 CONFLICTS MST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PUNS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SALE NOTIFY BARGIMUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO RESOLVE ALL P12081E/AS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. w x z a wa< I PO i CO r VICINITY MAP COS -CO DRIVE PROPERTY / UNE SUITE 150 123'-r CROSSWALK 33.0 EXISTING:MK/PY A4OVE EX ' 1 G R.- GNA SGS ' i O DRIVE b 1 " o i,› Q.1 J t' •Jt: i- _ 7-7_4-i- 15 bra_ t, --lit rX..orLxtieerJe---7 I \ i ___,,,4 Ora' 11 ' I a r AREA OF WORK ', NEW CONCRETE TANK PAD NEW 1,500 GALLON NEW 15,000 GALLON ADDITIVE UST I_ DIESEL FUEL UST 0'c60 EXISTING LANDSCAPE 200SETBACK ISLAND AND LIGHT STANDARD FROM OHWM IN THIS AREA `\ \ 25'd' 20-0 4 , 100' SETBACK FROM OHWM — COSTCO WHOLESALE •k PROP TY LINE PROJECT DATA CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 WAREHOUSE SITE AREA: 13.93 ACRES (606,591 S.F.) OPTICAL SIFE'AREA: 428 ACRES (186.232 S.F' TOTAL SITE AREA 18.21 ACRES (792,823 S.F.) BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING 6ARGHAUSEN CIVIL DWG DATED 6.24-99. EXISTING BUILDING DATA (WAREHOUSE): EXISTING BUILDING AREA EXISTING TIRE INSTALLATION EXISTING BALER ROOM EXISTING TOTAL BUILDING 206,910 S.F 2.453 S.F 2.903 SF 212,266 SF EXISTING PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): G) 10' WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS HANDICAP STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (WISE) 502 STALLS 88 STALLS 12 STALLS 602 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 712266 SF): 2.84 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED 8Y JURISDICTION (2.5 STALLS / 1000 5.7.): 531 STALL) PROPOSED PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): TOTAL PARKING (NO CHANGE) 602 STALLS EXISTING BUILDING DATA (OPTICAL): EXISTING OPTICAL FACILITY 34.544 S.F EXISTING PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): G 10' WIDE STALLS G 9' WIDE STALLS Q,,c HANDICAP STALLS 11 STALLS 151 STALLS 4 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (OPTICAL) 166 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F OF BUILDING AREA (34,544 SF): 4.81 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (1.0 STALLS / 1000 S.F.) 35 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (OPTICAL) G 10 WIDE STALLS aa9' WIDE STALLS .HANDICAP STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA (34544 SF), JURISDICTION REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING EXTRA PARKING AVAILIBLE FOR WHSE 9 STALLS 147 STALLS 4 STALLS 160 STALL'_ 4.63 STALLS 35 STALLS 160 STALLS 125 STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING (OVERALL) 762 STALLS 1 0TAL REOUIRED BY JURISDICTION 566 STALLS NO, OF STALLS PER 1003 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 246,810 SF). S09 STALLS 451 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 EXISTING FEtICE \I '} LAND USE SITE PLAN TUKWILA, WA MAY 8, 2014 Croy. rewxa4•13nalrea In any kr.n. a by Ix, peM1,1tRa...110. me 1110 112TH AVE. NE 1 SUITE 500 BELLEVUE, WA 1 08004 1425.463.2000 1 1425.463 2002 MUNannyG2.c6m 93-044-28 MAY 5, 2014 LAND USE SITE PLAN U5 TUKWILA PKWY,/ w 3 n t ¢ w U p O “MMInri 6,Ia (—\ y CJJI GU Uk. S. 160111 VICINITY MAP COS -CO DRIVE PROPERTY / UNE SUITE 150 123'-r CROSSWALK 33.0 EXISTING:MK/PY A4OVE EX ' 1 G R.- GNA SGS ' i O DRIVE b 1 " o i,› Q.1 J t' •Jt: i- _ 7-7_4-i- 15 bra_ t, --lit rX..orLxtieerJe---7 I \ i ___,,,4 Ora' 11 ' I a r AREA OF WORK ', NEW CONCRETE TANK PAD NEW 1,500 GALLON NEW 15,000 GALLON ADDITIVE UST I_ DIESEL FUEL UST 0'c60 EXISTING LANDSCAPE 200SETBACK ISLAND AND LIGHT STANDARD FROM OHWM IN THIS AREA `\ \ 25'd' 20-0 4 , 100' SETBACK FROM OHWM — COSTCO WHOLESALE •k PROP TY LINE PROJECT DATA CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 WAREHOUSE SITE AREA: 13.93 ACRES (606,591 S.F.) OPTICAL SIFE'AREA: 428 ACRES (186.232 S.F' TOTAL SITE AREA 18.21 ACRES (792,823 S.F.) BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING 6ARGHAUSEN CIVIL DWG DATED 6.24-99. EXISTING BUILDING DATA (WAREHOUSE): EXISTING BUILDING AREA EXISTING TIRE INSTALLATION EXISTING BALER ROOM EXISTING TOTAL BUILDING 206,910 S.F 2.453 S.F 2.903 SF 212,266 SF EXISTING PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): G) 10' WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS HANDICAP STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (WISE) 502 STALLS 88 STALLS 12 STALLS 602 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 712266 SF): 2.84 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED 8Y JURISDICTION (2.5 STALLS / 1000 5.7.): 531 STALL) PROPOSED PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): TOTAL PARKING (NO CHANGE) 602 STALLS EXISTING BUILDING DATA (OPTICAL): EXISTING OPTICAL FACILITY 34.544 S.F EXISTING PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): G 10' WIDE STALLS G 9' WIDE STALLS Q,,c HANDICAP STALLS 11 STALLS 151 STALLS 4 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (OPTICAL) 166 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F OF BUILDING AREA (34,544 SF): 4.81 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (1.0 STALLS / 1000 S.F.) 35 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (OPTICAL) G 10 WIDE STALLS aa9' WIDE STALLS .HANDICAP STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA (34544 SF), JURISDICTION REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING EXTRA PARKING AVAILIBLE FOR WHSE 9 STALLS 147 STALLS 4 STALLS 160 STALL'_ 4.63 STALLS 35 STALLS 160 STALLS 125 STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING (OVERALL) 762 STALLS 1 0TAL REOUIRED BY JURISDICTION 566 STALLS NO, OF STALLS PER 1003 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 246,810 SF). S09 STALLS 451 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 EXISTING FEtICE \I '} LAND USE SITE PLAN TUKWILA, WA MAY 8, 2014 Croy. rewxa4•13nalrea In any kr.n. a by Ix, peM1,1tRa...110. me 1110 112TH AVE. NE 1 SUITE 500 BELLEVUE, WA 1 08004 1425.463.2000 1 1425.463 2002 MUNannyG2.c6m 93-044-28 MAY 5, 2014 LAND USE SITE PLAN 15' SAE YARD 8.S.8.L. 553 OF TUKWIA LIMITED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25 AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON OGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT rREC. N0. 9808130750 IXC. 8 'T\ ,44 CROSSWALK j )" WATER VALVE SL IS 050E STOP SIGN Ca STD CRATE TYPE I 911525.64' ` 12• ADS I.E. 042.3 29' - - 8• ADS LE 642339' ROOF DRAIN ROOf DRAIN ROof DRAIN ROOF DRAIN is u (1y8,),'. • 5- 58 510 GRATE TYPE I RBI -20.30' 8' 0.1. LE. ,. ..?• E_24.30' 9INOLE WHITE STR1E -.SINGLE IRATE S35P( FA0LDNO ON CONC. Poi) ..0 a; -` r. J ✓ 85' RAE LOT LIGHT 1 1 1 1 1 25' 105E 1A8.7T VAULTS LOT 5445 L01 LICH1 GUARD POSt'•• _ CD 5T0 GRATE TYPE 1 RJMa26.00' 8• D.I. E. 5423.80' 12. 0.7. LE. 9423.80' 7.8 SPACES 9.3' PRE / 1C' UCH, 105' PRE`` -f AP o 5 p0'. - 5I1fE HYDRANT W/G0ARD POSTS S 88'22'15" E 302.95' 51C'g )' 9 8X1 ATER VALVE 200' SETBACK FROM 07070.7 RED MAPLE: 12.4 CAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1;4 11 1 1 0 10 20 40 SCALE. 1'-20' NA50 VAULT 10EPHONE VNJLT 8)110 RUT 0 • Z lc)N3o CU W Z c 6 0 0, =. O m N P-- U • N 2 U Y W I— O 00? Z Ai 1-- 0 O LL, W O O a) L- a- W • H LEGEND \\\ SDRKT 1gNIAIEM (S 40100) 051)116 Lor ,04 TARO LGRi NKR 1E1ER .DXCIIDN BOR (380) 60161 BASIN (co) 51010 MANHOLE (504X) 51051 C 15100/POOF ORId'I YAW/ SEAER *MOLE (591° . -SS YhiARY SERER UMW! (SSCO) -50 GAS hum G10 )ALE (G\( %Ca VALVE Mi FIRE CONE610* FIE HYDRANE (F4) WA -ER WVMOLE WADI 1ETER (W1) 5311 gC10N COINER (AS NOTED) • SE' 16815/CIA WARNED LS 45789 AT 6.510110 50610* ASRikT CONCRETE cavil 568145E 9:YTR UNE s-cw Dewva U42 4/ woo FTBCE 655 FENCE j LEGAL DEPARTMENT O VL 999 LAKE DRIVE N CO ISSAQUAH, WA HORIZONTAL DATUM - BASIS OF BEARINGS NAD 83(91) THE BEARING OF THE LINE BETWEEN THE WSDOT POINT ID NUMBERS 136 AND 1384 TAKEN AS SOUTH 44'36'58" EAST, BASED UPON NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983(91) VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF ELEVATIONS NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 -NAVD 88 PROJECT BENCHMARK KING CO0NTY POINT 2E510441)0N 3537, TAJ(EN AS ELEV. • 29.524 FEET 5 10 0 10 ••••- a a r 1i rl VICINITY MAP 6J I L LJ v COSTCO DRIVE PROPERTY LINE CAIS 111\11:3 SUFI 150 CROSSWALK b 2i$' COSTCO WHOLESALE /x-0'EXISrl tt96tg1iOPYO -f b It , _ mmm----- ooio T —.'---- oma,s. 1 T F S7I• 0 .III^ CE N. - m =-1- YAr-MISi Ar— ' l'6 1 5----i • W CRETE I , TANENK FAC NEW 15000N2 GALLON ADDITIVE UST DEMO EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND LIGHT STANDARD IN THIS AREA NEN 15.000 GALLON AREA OF WORK I; ri DIESEL FUEL UST J , • 200' SETBACK. FROM OMNIA \ 25'-4' 1 1 1 20,' it 100' SETBACK FROM 011WM PROPE) TY UNE f . EXISTING' FgNCE LAND USE SITE PLAN Rr JFO TUKWILA, WA MAY 8, 2014 PROJECT DATA CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98168 WAREHOUSE SITE AREA. 13.93 ACRES (606;551 S.F.) OPTICAL SITE AREA: 4.20 ACRES (166.232 S F.) TOTAL SITE AREA: 1821 ACRES (792,823 SE) BOUNDARIES INFORMATION 7111S PLAN HAS 86E14 PREPARED BY USMG BARGHAUSEN CIVIL DING DATED 6-24.99. EXISTING BUILDING DATA (WAREHOUSE): EXISTING BUILDING AREA EXISTING TIRE INSTALLATION EXISTING BALER ROOM EXISTING TOTAL BUILDING 206 910 S.F. 2,453 S.F 2903 S F. 212266 S.F EXISTING PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): 10'WIDE STALLS 502 STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS 88 STALLS (-I“ HANDICAP STALLS 12 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (WHSE) 602 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 SF. OF BUILDING AREA 212,266 SF). NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (2 5 STALLS /1000 S.F 1. 2.84 STALLS 531 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): TOTAL PARKING (NO CHANGE) 602 STALLS EXISTING BUILDING DATA (OPTICAL): EXISTING OPTICAL FACILITY 34544 SF. EXISTING PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): @ 16' WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS HANDICAP STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (OPTICAL) 11 STALLS 151 STALLS 4 STALLS 166 STALLS NO OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA ;34,544 SF). 4.81 STALLS NO OF STALLS REQUIRED 8Y JURISDICTION (1.O STALLS/1000 S.F.) 35 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): 10 WIDE STALLS Q 9' WIDE STALLS 4. HANDICAP STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING 9 STALLS 147 STALLS 4 STALLS 160 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 34.544 SF): 4 63 STALLS JURISDICTION REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING EXTRA PARKING AVAILIBLE FOR W'HSE 35 STALLS 160 STALLS 125 STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING (OVERALL) 762 STALLS TOTAL REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION 566 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BU1D.NG AREA ;246.810 SF): 3.09 STALLS 451 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA98188 11111111111111... .,<. 48i w,444.4a4.8, o< ....44,44..-, 1110 112TH AVE. NE 1 SUNS 500 BELLEVUE, WA 198004 t 425463.2000 1 (425.463 2002 MuK'annyG2.mn1 93-044-28 MAY 5, 2014 LAND USE SITE PLAN E3 TUKWILA PNWY / W. VALLEY HWY 111 1 I urr) a C # a C., 0,G 0 i N COSI CU UN. S. 180TH VICINITY MAP 6J I L LJ v COSTCO DRIVE PROPERTY LINE CAIS 111\11:3 SUFI 150 CROSSWALK b 2i$' COSTCO WHOLESALE /x-0'EXISrl tt96tg1iOPYO -f b It , _ mmm----- ooio T —.'---- oma,s. 1 T F S7I• 0 .III^ CE N. - m =-1- YAr-MISi Ar— ' l'6 1 5----i • W CRETE I , TANENK FAC NEW 15000N2 GALLON ADDITIVE UST DEMO EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND LIGHT STANDARD IN THIS AREA NEN 15.000 GALLON AREA OF WORK I; ri DIESEL FUEL UST J , • 200' SETBACK. FROM OMNIA \ 25'-4' 1 1 1 20,' it 100' SETBACK FROM 011WM PROPE) TY UNE f . EXISTING' FgNCE LAND USE SITE PLAN Rr JFO TUKWILA, WA MAY 8, 2014 PROJECT DATA CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98168 WAREHOUSE SITE AREA. 13.93 ACRES (606;551 S.F.) OPTICAL SITE AREA: 4.20 ACRES (166.232 S F.) TOTAL SITE AREA: 1821 ACRES (792,823 SE) BOUNDARIES INFORMATION 7111S PLAN HAS 86E14 PREPARED BY USMG BARGHAUSEN CIVIL DING DATED 6-24.99. EXISTING BUILDING DATA (WAREHOUSE): EXISTING BUILDING AREA EXISTING TIRE INSTALLATION EXISTING BALER ROOM EXISTING TOTAL BUILDING 206 910 S.F. 2,453 S.F 2903 S F. 212266 S.F EXISTING PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): 10'WIDE STALLS 502 STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS 88 STALLS (-I“ HANDICAP STALLS 12 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (WHSE) 602 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 SF. OF BUILDING AREA 212,266 SF). NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (2 5 STALLS /1000 S.F 1. 2.84 STALLS 531 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): TOTAL PARKING (NO CHANGE) 602 STALLS EXISTING BUILDING DATA (OPTICAL): EXISTING OPTICAL FACILITY 34544 SF. EXISTING PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): @ 16' WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS HANDICAP STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (OPTICAL) 11 STALLS 151 STALLS 4 STALLS 166 STALLS NO OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA ;34,544 SF). 4.81 STALLS NO OF STALLS REQUIRED 8Y JURISDICTION (1.O STALLS/1000 S.F.) 35 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): 10 WIDE STALLS Q 9' WIDE STALLS 4. HANDICAP STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING 9 STALLS 147 STALLS 4 STALLS 160 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 34.544 SF): 4 63 STALLS JURISDICTION REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING EXTRA PARKING AVAILIBLE FOR W'HSE 35 STALLS 160 STALLS 125 STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING (OVERALL) 762 STALLS TOTAL REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION 566 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BU1D.NG AREA ;246.810 SF): 3.09 STALLS 451 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA98188 11111111111111... .,<. 48i w,444.4a4.8, o< ....44,44..-, 1110 112TH AVE. NE 1 SUNS 500 BELLEVUE, WA 198004 t 425463.2000 1 (425.463 2002 MuK'annyG2.mn1 93-044-28 MAY 5, 2014 LAND USE SITE PLAN City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning c tukwilaWA.nov_ BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L14-0056 DECLARATION KNOW ALL 1171 B'' -HESE PR'5EN1 no, 54, !IIF LN0 R510NED OW EP i FEE 0445 5/5 5411, 4,0741 (17550075 03 H50034 1744E ( 54404111 155 5150.5114571 1HEREEW PII4SUAN TU 5554 59..7.040 AN5 DECURE 01,s 415 1511AEF TO U . THE - :41345 5544F.S5'41411CN 4F 04. ';AME. 0.1.1 THAT 5540 , DJUS MEN1 15 MALE 45IE1 11 E FREE 50415191 011) 14 ACCCRLMY,E /0111 111E OES!RES % H•55 40/l1ES(S). H 44TIIESS 1!15470 WE ;WE 35! 0!R 14144(15 AND `.;ALS. 11-1J4A5 A. 8AR0kIUSSN ACKNOWLEDGMENT SATE 04 845111/01(01 ES COUNTY OF 4450 50,150 1145 1 Y.N04 4R 1.0 _ SAHRTALTDR, roOricEFA rHomAS A I/701 ot1E,4 111E PERS014 0.110 4131,11111 Dr,EALE ME. 0,111 I L / 5444411/,9 0 ll L SYSNED RIS 110451(I' ANO ACKNOWLEDGED 6 (( /DEE AND 55010 Ni MOT OF 50.001 IAp11 OP 1'E 5SES AND PURPOSES MENTIONEC nAs INSINUMENI. JAI-. 14410 1'1 1440 (I 140Vrt1A.6 4W rIA lwi gIG AND EDF 51ASI7Nc,:e `2`44?o No om' 1581TED NAME -•- 45510155 n• -G.1.... k `v�:, PUBItA t Wn MY tPP:1:N1MF'rl LXI'IPEs 0°7' 6°),10S_ Op Rye 111 APPROVALS TUKN0.A SHORT SUB0454SI54 7088(TIEE APPROVAL 7541EA7D AND 45'^..0450 r.4 0,6514610`- COMMUTEE AND 11 01/V 03.9:970 RLN', 165 4%9 047 . 204 510.94//114 5q0 .,3:r•-, CC401EE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OE' A5s55UENT5 1'441511 AVX: ARPPOPEi '015 . DAY DAY OF __-.-._.._-___--.__...--. 01,14. 71445 535010 A50E5551! 1400441-01 24 5 773545.0140 I5.( 7550:711 1 01456 45 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE 58E0 FOR RECORD THIS 00., of SURVEYOR'S NOTES: • UNCERCRO3/40 1.,71514 LOCA740145 APE SHOW/ 41 ,1514 0.5554,440.44E _05,411090 PER AP4R0VE0 EN;II/EER110 PUNS. 2. 1HE 54/44755 OF PARCELS A 4440 B SHALL BE ;501710JAS.Y RE550A5455 450 111 44/41114440(5 IN AHY Rv3( WA175 7410/08 4E0140 014 DIFIR 453/ 554 5 PARCELS. 3. THE 41. 3ER OF PASCEL 0 SHALL. H4 H10W;N':.BLE 404 'IE NANIENANCE 9F -HE ROCK WALL ANO FENCE ON 111E EAST 510E OF PARCEL B. IH. EXiST1.5 13' 51055 DPNIIAOE 515E415111 C8EA4E0 BY THE i"i8' OF 011'175415* 4044 ENCUMBERS BOTH PARCELS A 4110 B ALONG W11H 017.6`7. P4700580. SASIS OF BEARING: PLT OF 5,1051150, REFOR'050 111 VOLUME 138 05 11315, "515 PI 5hi'11IIGI1 31, P(5043S 01 KING 01(04117, !945/1/57134. PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE. A FRU oS/ERSE 'USING A 1PIMBLE 600 9 DBOPC TOTAL S15,1044 IP:MO, -56. 8OOTIC 1010.E ,/14.014 AND 1UPSON 043 ,EPS 5UPP1.1414150 81111 11110 411 .S +IA. C 1041410. 75'406140 144E 111011.411,14544 556 Aho 4ERT415L PELABONSH,FS BEIWEEN THE 408055410,P7055701 UNE5, AND ,57,5/.175 FE1114ES AS `,0551 14R0.5. 1,5 HI. 11.1.^0, .AA RCM OR EXCEEDS 144E STANDARDS 50P ,AN- BOUNDARY 0044745 A5 SET 0011111 441 WA:. 312-13:-090. LEGEND: S 00060 15011UMEEIT O 100110 REBA'i5AF 701115 FA) [ 121.4 • SEi 55855/CAP "655 27323" E. SEI SCRIBED 'X' 0/77" FENCE LE 0(41' EASEMENT (FCR PJ(1, SDE )011 ORA11 EASEMENT (PER PLA() - •--sopo MAIN 111.10 WF WATERLINE BASEMEN, "FEB 5541) - i4 15'- -V4 W/ LIOSIN'_ SSF 50.'400.5.1 SEVIER 5/,550,3.0 1555 PLAT; .. SAMOAN 5151 0145 i Ll 105511044 DOA • TARO 30444/ U TF11184104)5 PSEe j/ 110'411 514171415` 151 5514ER VAULT • 1/11ISP 445155 180154.'ON RCA / f 1 VOL. PG 6,.6918'39' 4,45.00' 5.3013' 40 i& `4(5 45504,4 EXISTING LEGA. OESGRFIKNIS: PARCEL A: 151 14. SL4ER4E4/, 455085413 10 THE PLAT FILREOF 5550 434 01 i",AFS, Al PAGES 81 10411511 83. RECORDS Or 41o..0 '.00511', 48450.75108 PARCEL H. LOT 13. 5L*ERVEA. /55555K; TO 111E RAT 4KREOF 0(55.847.1)',11 4'01145 1357 ;IF PLATS, Al PAGES 81 THROUGH 83. RECORDS OF K:0.0 ;03811', v40445005. 10C54HER 8.10 UND61003 INTEREST J4 MAGI A 544,1 HVIIW, AC5C61N110'F0 111E PUT THEREOF 854/5555 I5 V01UME '3A OF RATS. AT EASES 0' KR(41511 83. RECORDS 57 1060 CORM. WA`_J1'N01(XN. RFASED LEGAL OESCRFIIONS: PARCEL A 101 14. 5:::2+NE11, F.ESORCEO N 401565 '38 3F PLATS '0555 8'-HR01/5H 83, 955GR85 OF 5810 COUNTY, 4/31114 4'04 TO;E1456 * • 18:1 50(4(391 OF _OT 43. SRNEWEW. RECOR5 4 N 85.65E 138 OF PLATS, PAGES 81 1811501GII 83, 41(135114 of 45, 54051(0 WASH:0E10N. CE0CP'BE0 A5 FOLLOWS: 8550/.1845 AT 111E N541161851 5344459 OF 5.10 55 THENCE NORTH 50'37'02' EAST, 14:154 0161 x0444 INE M H1H INE THEREOF; 00 t8.t SOLON .;008',5' WE5i 32'03 FELT: THENCE NORTH 5.0032 ' WEST, 6 EEE,: 4/7745! SCUT! .553'1' N[01, 1984 REI 10 v' 155FEa CV' EP AVD 144E EG:N* OF 9EGNN'N0. 001431 R. 156 13. 01.1,5458, RE5,51(15E0 N 40143 "44 a 6141S, iiN55 6 ',ROAN E3. RECORDS OF R0K; Ewer. 4005N5T04, P'4CEP' ',A1 PORTION OF 10! 13. 5415545*. PE50P.053 10 '010.3: '38 OF PIA15. PACES 81 31103.0501 83. 4(50811, OF 4,90 801/'4 6754/05-1044, CESCFSED9 AS FOLLO'W'S. BECINVI:IO AT THE. NOR'1TWEST CORNER OF 543 LO-: 1!174457 N34141 5032'20" EAST. BORA FEET 45*,, 1111 1:;4411/1 ONE 11151:E51-; MENET 51,016 508114' 'NEST, 30.23 FEET THENCE NORTH 0003'00' WEST, 47.36 7550, THENCE SOWN 64'55'03' 'NEST, 12.64 FEET T5 047 I17F111WF51 11141,850 AN': 1111; FNUJ! OF 4RIY914R10 10011177 `MIN 40.11/0 N1FR551 P: TRACT A 5.1l5035*4. / 5CR04)5'5 THE RAl 11,4REOF 75535455 IK VOLU115 138 :F PLATS, 41 PAGES 8' "154111' 83, : 50535 Cr KING 551NIY, WASH'INOI1k1. 'may....: - 22514 A _ 5 !N NECK _ _ OF -_.. _. -_ 4•T 55555 A' 11 REO1E51 J' BAR0HAUSEN 7053..10/3 • ENG1Ti0ERS, 1115 - 4/177 5F=EC0RF5 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: THIS 501114/444 :UNE 431151415441 CORRE54LT REPRESENTS 4 51'12J754 /NAVE B! ME 0R 0443.78 MY GRE500 111 5ONFOR1WICE *1443 0'0.-E 4443 10L4111 01410-"O aucvs1 2013 05119.0 ,1 SAL W„55.4:1; ON LS 1!05 NO 273D, 14/2,//.f- DATE 'r\i •1 ti 12 SET RF&R%VP-\ LS 27328 \ i-4 SCR0E11 X Al 508515 \ N6R3Y224 5.41' :1j �A. 3e \I v SCALE 1" 1 30' Te. .S mr•N �Z KENT, 41.4 980 2440E SOUTH • (425)251-5222 (425)251-8782 FAX Wet 6No FEANC, wm PLANNNO, 4 _.aEEp Rh. 449, FNMBONN-MA SFIMCES SCALE CHECKED a4:i 0JS JCB 2262 FN0 EX SINE 544,R/!50'-. 355(44LE1 1430( 7' 8801 LS: UVC N1'2013114 11,30 4465437'22'6 5011 II41/i6 "1 CORNER '8000 'ENCS kV 8751 RIY4, 4431.1 _U 5(l, 0.2' EAST '4.5-2Z.)-.. -SET REBAP./545 ., 244170 R'3CA 84.) - 34' EAST 0/-'11180.'. -5 1.2 :'.Er. \. FRO 51:5140 RE8A1/047-, (LEGIBLE; COM:RR5 RALE 1 60 T, IYICS AN I P300 7:1105 3.8'WEST - NORM 14030 FENCE SSE (RR 5:41; `-.0' 4514 P. 5VSIn4 '\ 6411040 5-&,544545, IDR4EP. I.i 91/111 5075(5NC LOT AREAS: LOT '3. 10.4600 50. F-. OI '4- 12.555 55, 0' 58863'224 90.10 SET KEW/CAP - 27378 x-60514415 13' EAS 55 15 NEW LOT AREAS: PARSEL A: 17,808 SC. FT. PARCH 0: 10.02/ SG. F1. 204 9.024! 0000:" hF� 55 -o 40 PTN OF THE SW1/4 OF THE NW1/4 OF SEC. 26 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHEETI 1 OF COSTCO FUELING STATION 451 COSTCO DRIVE PL14-0023 L14-0035 - DR -ADMIN E14-0009 - SEPA C K LST [14-0014 - SEPA ADDENDUM E14-0009 SEPA CHECKLIST n�J��ItLQ h,4� o J � �� Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director 190$ City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor MEMORANDUM October 28, 2014 TO: Jack Pace, DCD Director and SEPA Responsible Official FM: Laura Benjamin, Assistant Planner RE: E14-0014 Addendum to E14-0009: Costco Wholesale Proposal: • Amend the SEPA checklist for E14-0009, a Determination of Nonsignificance issued July 2, 2014. At the time of the initial SEPA submittal, Costco planned to add diesel fuel to its fueling facility with the addition of a 15,000 -gallon UST. Since July 2014, Costco has elected to install one 20,000 -gallon diesel UST. As a result, the original SEPA Checklist has been revised to add the installation of a 20,000 -gallon UST. At the time of the initial SEPA determination, the City reviewed the proposal to remove approximately 364 square feet of landscaping and a net reduction of two trees to allow for the new UST. These landscaping modifications were granted design review approval on July 29, 2014 under L14-0035. A small portion of the proposed work (previously approved under E14-0009) will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (Shoreline Setback). A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), as the value of the work within the shoreline buffer is less than $6,416. Findings: 1. The revisions to the proposed project fall within the impacts analyzed in the original SEPA Checklist and do not represent a substantial change to the Determination of Nonsignificance issued by this Department. 2. As demonstrated in the Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate, the work occurring within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a). Conclusion: The City has reviewed the checklist submitted by Costco Wholesale for E14-0009 and the additional information submitted for the SEPA Addendum, E14-0014, and determined that it, along with City staff analysis, is adequate in evaluating the impacts associated with installing one 20,000 -gallon UST to add diesel fuel to the existing fueling facility. There are no adverse impacts associated with the proposed change in the size of the underground fuel tank from 15,000 gallon to 20,000 -gallon. Related Information: 1. SEPA Checklists (E14-0009 and E14-0014) 2. Issued DNS (E14-0009), prepared by the City of Tukwila 3. Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate, prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 4. Diesel Grading and Drainage Exhibit, prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director SEPA ADDENDUM TO DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE E14-0009 Description of current proposal: Install one 20,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) rather than the originally proposed 15,000 -gallon diesel UST. The installation of one 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, and product piping to equip six multi -product dispensers with diesel dispensing, and associated site improvements remain the same. File number: E14-0014 Proponent: Matt Cyr of Barghuasen Consulting Engineers, Inc. for Costco Wholesale Location of current proposal: 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 Lead agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Title of document being added to: SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance, issued by the City of Tukwila on July 2, 2014 Date documents were prepared: May 21, 2014 and October 10, 2014 Documents available for review at: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WAS 98188, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report dated October 21, 2014, the lead agency has determined that there are no adverse impacts associated with the installation of one 20,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank at the Costco Wholesale Retail Fueling Facility. Address: 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Contact Person: Laura Benjamin, Assistant Planner Telephone: 206-433-7166 Responsible Official: Jack Pace, Director Telephone: 206-431-3686 Signature: cc: Files: E14-0009, E14-0014, L14-035 Date: (07Vp iO) 4' (41 eat/ of Ju;F'uu&a Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, LOWa & f arYI c1 , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application L14-0035, Notice of Decision Mailing requested by: Laura Benjamin Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mailer's signature � Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action X Other: Addendum to Determination of Non -Significance Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _28 day of October , 2014 Project Name: Costco Addendum to E14-0009 Project Number: PL14-0023 Associated File Number (s): E14-0009, L14-0035, E14-0014 Mailing requested by: Laura Benjamin Mailer's signature � W:\USERS\LAURA\SEPA\A14 0014 COSTCO ADD\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION E14 0014.DOC c c Mailing Addresses for E14-0014 Affidavit Department of Ecology — sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) — mcyr@barghausen.com Costco Wholesale Corp. Property Tax Dept. 190 999 Lake Dr. Issaquah, WA 98027 King County Assessor 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Puget Sound Clean Air Agency 1904 3rd Avenue, Suite 105 Seattle, WA 98101 Fueling Facility Diesel Fuel Addition Costco Wholesale 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 APN No. 362304-9107 Costco Loc. No. 6 October 10, 2014 PROJECT NARRATIVE RECEIVED OCT 14 2014 (;(N✓ifA i VI 1 r DLVELUNMLNT Overview The addition of diesel fuel to the Tukwila Costco fueling facility will include one (1) 20,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST), one (1) 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, product piping to equip six (6) multi -product dispensers with diesel dispensing, and associated site improvements. The addition was originally approved as a Type 1 Minor Modification (File No. L14-0035) on July 29, 2014 with a 15,000 - gallon diesel UST, but Costco has since elected to install a 20,000 -gallon diesel UST. The USTs will be located to the south of the fueling facility, and site improvements include the replacement of pavement in the immediate area and a slight reduction in landscaping. Operation The fueling facility will continue to operate as approved under the existing land use approvals with regard to the hours of operation and staffing levels. Grading The tank holes for the additional USTs will be shored to minimized impacts to the site. Approximately 440 cubic yards of material will be excavated to accommodate the UST installation. The impervious area for the site will increase by approximately 364 square feet with this. A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (Shoreline Setback). A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate have been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the shoreline buffer is less than $6,416.00. Parking and Circulation The parking and circulation improvements associated with the fueling facility expansion will not be impacted by the diesel service addition. Transportation The fueling facility is a member's only accessory component to Costco's operation. Since approximately 2 percent of vehicles on the road are powered by diesel fuel, the addition of diesel service is not anticipated to generate a significant number of additional member trips to the fueling facility. Landscaping and Lighting The installation of the USTs will remove approximately 364 square feet of landscaping and a net reduction of approximately two (2) trees. One (1) light standard will be removed with this addition. Construction Construction of the diesel addition and associated site improvements will be completed in a single phase and commence after approval of the applicable permits. The addition will be separate from the expansion. The existing fueling facility will remain open during construction of the expansion and night construction will be proposed through an extension of Noise Variance Permit No. A13-018. 7880.010.doc SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND °CT 14 Oh I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: <: , DEVLLUI,MENT Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition 2. Name of Applicant: Costco Wholesale. Contact Person: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) 3. Date checklist prepared: May 21, 2014 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction of this project will begin following the environmental determination and upon approval and issuance of all required construction permits. The project will be completed in a single phase and is expected to be completed in 2014. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are no proposed additions, expansions, or future activities associated with this project. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • The Environmental Checklist prepared for the original fueling facility, dated May 20, 1997. • A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate, prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Civil Engineering Plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Landscape Plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no known pending applications or governmental approvals or other proposals directly affecting this project. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 1 Agency Comments e 0 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Local: • City of Tukwila o Administrative Design Review - Minor Modification o Construction Permit o Public Works Permit o Underground Storage Tank Installation Permit o Electrical Permit Regional: • Puget Sound Clean Air Agency: o Notice of Construction o Permit to Operate State: • Washington Department of Ecology — Toxic Cleanup Program: o Underground Storage Tank Notification and Registration Washington State Department of Revenue: o Business License Application — Underground Storage Tank Addendum, and Weights and Measures Addendum • Washington Department of Agriculture — Weights and Measures o Placed -In -Service Report 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project includes the addition of diesel fuel to the existing Tukwila Costco fueling facility, which includes one (1) 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST), one (1) 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, product piping to equip six (6) existing multi- product dispensers with gasoline and diesel dispensing, and associated site improvements. The USTs will be located to the south of the fueling facility. Site improvements include the replacement of pavement in the immediate area, the removal of one Tight standard, and a slight reduction in landscaping. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax Iot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at the existing Costco fueling facility located at 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188. Parcel number 3623049107. 12. Does the proposal lic within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (200 foot shoreline setback). A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 2 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The developed site is generally flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The overall pavement slopes in the project area are approximately 2 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the prior SEPA information, the subsurface soils at the project site consist of fill and alluvium. At a depth of 10 to 15 feet, the soil consists of sand and silts. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no observed surface indications of unstable soils at the project site. We are not aware of a history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity of the project site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The project will include the excavation of approximately 350 cubic yards of material for the new underground storage tanks and piping. Approximately 240 cubic yards will be brought on-site to maintain the subgrade and designed slope of the paved surfaces. The source of any fill will be pursuant to geotechnical engineer recommendations as approved by the City of Tukwila. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Soil erosion is possible during construction site work. Once the addition has been constructed, there is very little potential for erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 86.4 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. This is an increase of approximately 319 square feet or 0.2 percent in impervious surface. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 3 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) will be prepared. Necessary measures to limit erosion will be implemented before and during clearing and grading activity in accordance with City of Tukwila Public Works requirements. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The addition of diesel product to the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant long-term impacts to existing air quality. During construction, there will be construction equipment exhaust that will be emitted from construction equipment. After construction, the vehicles visiting the fueling facility will generate exhaust; however, the majority of these vehicles will be from the existing traffic stream already visiting the existing Costco warehouse and fueling facility. The fueling facility presently emits gasoline vapors into the atmosphere; however, these emissions will be controlled by Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery systems approved by the California Air Resources Board (GARB) as required by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. Diesel fuel volatility is below regulatory vapor thresholds, and is exempt from air quality requirements. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The project will continue comply with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency requirements for the site. 3. Water a. Surface: I. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River (a King County Type S Aquatic Area) is approximately 200 feet from the diesel addition project. The Green River flows into the Duwamish Waterway, then Elliott Bay. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (200 foot shoreline setback). This work includes diesel product pipe installation, and repaving/regrading associated with the diesel underground storage tank installation. The diesel underground storage tank is located outside the Urban Conservancy Environment. The limit of this work is approximately 188 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 4 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Green River. A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill will be replaced or removed from surface waters or wetlands. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions will be required. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is protected by a levee. According to FEMA FIRM Map No. 53033C0978F, dated May 16, 1995, the site is located within an area classified as Zone X. Zone X is described as: Areas of 500 -year flood; areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of Tess than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No change to existing. The project will not discharge waste materials into the surface waters. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Temporary dewatering may be required for installation of the underground storage tanks depending on seasonal groundwater levels. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: No change to existing. No waste materials will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water fl o w ? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 5 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Surface water runoff will continue to be collected in a series of existing catch basins and conveyed to the existing on-site private stormwater system. The under -canopy area will continue to be hydraulically isolated and convey under -canopy runoff through an oil/water separator prior to being discharged to the existing sanitary sewer system. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The existing water quality features will substantially limit the chance that waste materials could enter ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The existing stormwater facilities will be utilized to control and treat surface water runoff. The diesel product addition will not impact the existing system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shnibs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X Other types of vegetation: Groundcover b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A portion of the existing parking lot landscaping on the south of the fueling facility will be removed and replaced. Landscaping will be installed according to landscape plans prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Approximately 319 square feet of landscaping and two (2) red maples will be removed with this project. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge no threatened or endangered plant species are known to exist on or near the project. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed replacement landscaping will be consistent with existing parking lot landscaping and be composed of drought tolerant species. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 6 SEPA Checklist Agency Comments SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The site has been developed as the existing Costco warehouse and fueling facility. While small animals may inhabit the open spaces of the site, to our knowledge, no threatened or endangered species have been observed on the site. King County Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed maps have identified the Green River as a known salmon bearing river. The Green River is located approximately 200 feet east of the project. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway, a known route of migratory birds, including waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed at this time. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will continue to be used to provide power to the fueling facility. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The under -canopy lighting was recently upgraded to LED lighting fixtures which reduce energy consumption. No other measures are proposed with this project. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No new environmental health hazards are introduced to the site with this project. Potential environmental health hazards include exposure to gasoline and diesel during refueling of automobiles, risk of fire and potential for contamination of the environment by petroleum products in the unlikely event of a spill or release of fuel from the underground storage tanks, product lines, or dispensers. No other extraordinary health risks are foreseen. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No new special services are anticipated. The level of emergency services (fire, police, medical) would be consistent with the existing facility and other developments of this type. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The gasoline and diesel facility provides a significant number of features to reduce and control the potential for environmental health hazards. For example: • There are emergency shutoff switches located at the site in accordance with International Fire Code Standards and local requirements. • Fire extinguishers are provided in accordance with International Fire Code Standards and local requirements. • The underground storage tanks and product piping are of double - containment type construction. Tanks are of double -walled fiberglass materials, which provide protection against rupture and/or leakage. The fiberglass material helps prevent corrosive deterioration of the walls and helps prevent subsequent contamination of the surrounding soils. • The underground fuel system includes interstitial monitoring of the inner walls of the tanks and piping. This monitoring will detect any possible leaks, immediately notify the facility operator, and shut down that portion of the system with the detected leakage. • Upon installation, the system is pressure checked according to the manufacturer's specifications to detect any pressure loss and to isolate and correct any problems before covering the tanks and paving the site. • Additional primary and secondary containment equipment and spill - prevention features include overfill prevention features (OPW automatic shutoff drop tubes risers), gravity return of the un -dispensed product, flex - joints at tanks, and breakaway/impact valves at the dispensers. • The training of employees in emergency procedures helps avoid the release of fuel into the environment. Drivers are trained in transport, delivery, safety, and fuel containment procedures. Employees are trained in emergency procedures and supplied with on-site hazardous spill prevention plan and clean-up kits designed for this facility. • Stage I and II vapor recovery systems will be utilized on-site. These vapor recovery systems will reduce the amount of fuel vapor released at the time of fuel delivery to the underground storage tanks (Stage 1) and at the fuel dispensers during vehicle fueling (Stage II). b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise generated in the vicinity of the site generally consists of vehicles traveling on the adjacent rights-of-way, as well as commercial activity in the surrounding area and is not anticipated to affect the project. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise associated with construction activity at the project site will vary as construction progresses and depending on the equipment being used. After construction, noise will continue to be generated by automobile traffic and delivery truck traffic. These noise levels are anticipated to remain consistent with existing ambient noise levels. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is an existing Costco Wholesale and Costco regional optical facility with a fueling facility. The adjacent properties are a mixture of commercial and industrial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. The parcel contains the existing fueling facility and Costco regional optical facility. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is zoned TUC (Tukwila Urban Center). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation is TUC (Tukwila Urban Center). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? A portion of the site is within the Urban Conservancy Environment. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, other than a portion of the site is within the shoreline buffer or Urban Conservancy Environment. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No change from existing. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 9 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No individuals will be displaced. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None are proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be designed to meet the requirements of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, muddle, or low-income housing? No housing units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antemias; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? During the operating evening hours, the project will continue to provide under -canopy lighting that is designed to limit glare. The facility will be closed at night and only provide safety lighting. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 10 SEPA Checklist PIease respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Due to the flat -lens of the under -canopy lighting, the project will not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The project will not be affected by existing off-site sources of light are glare. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Christensen Trail is located along the Green River levee adjacent to the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No recreational uses will be displaced. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None are proposed at this time. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To our knowledge, no landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance are known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Private streets serving the site include Costco Drive and Christensen Drive. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 11 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments These private streets connect to Andover Park East and South 180th Street, which are both public streets. No new accesses are proposed with this project. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit does not serve the site. The closest bus stop is located 0.4 miles south along South 180th Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The overall Costco facility provides 762 parking spaces. The project will not impact existing parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads will be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. The fueling facility is a members -only accessory component to Costco's operation. Since approximately two (2) percent of the vehicles on the road today are powered by diesel fuel, the addition of diesel product is not anticipated to generate a significant number of additional member trips to the facility. Furthermore, peak volumes for the fueling facility occur during the midday on the weekend, which is outside of the typical commuter peaks on the transportation system. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are proposed because the project is a product addition to the existing fueling facility within the Costco development. While there may be a small increase in trips through the fueling facility there is no increase in the number of fueling positions, the main purpose of the project is to improve the service provided to the existing members at this location. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will not result in an increased need for public safety services such as police and fire protection beyond what is currently provided for the site. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 12 telephone., Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity natural gas , water, refuse service sanitary sewer , septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The existing utilities provided to the fueling facility will serve the project. The project will include the installation of underground storage tanks that exceed 10,000 gallons and associated fueling system piping. Modifications to existing stormwater and sanitary sewer infrastructure are not anticipated. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 13 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not applicable. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not applicable. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not applicable. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. SEPA Checklist Applicant Responses: Agency Comments S. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not applicable. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Not applicable. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Not applicable. D. SIGNATURE Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: /z)/ -1)I'1 Q 7880.008 matt edit.doc Page 15 Minnie Dhaliwal Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila Community Development 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING October 13, 2014 COURIER DELIVERY (206) 431-3685 RE: SEPA Addendum Application Costco Wholesale Retail Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, Washington 98188 Costco Loc. No. 6 / Our Job No. 7880 Dear Minnie: RECEIVED OCT 14 2014 ' ,(JiVllli il+1 f DEVELOPMENT On behalf of our client Costco Wholesale (Costco), Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. is submitting a SEPA Addendum Application for the above -referenced project. The application is for a diesel underground storage tank (UST) capacity modification to the 15,000 -gallon diesel UST capacity approved with File No. L14-0035. The SEPA Addendum is to allow the diesel product addition to install one (1) 20,000 -gallon diesel UST along with the prior approved one (1) 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, diesel product piping to six (6) existing multi -product gasoline dispensers (twelve (12) fueling positions), and minor site revisions. Site revisions include the net removal of two (2) interior parking lot trees and a minor landscape area reduction. The additional diesel storage capacity will have minimal impact on the previously approved site plan, no impact to existing structures, and result in no new significant environmental impacts. One benefit to the increased diesel capacity is the anticipated reduction in diesel fuel deliveries because of the increased on-site storage capacity. The following items are enclosed for your SEPA Addendum review: 1. Five (5) copies of the Signed Application Form 2. Five (5) copies of the SEPA Checklist 3. One (1) signed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership 4. Five (5) copies of the Project Narrative 5. One (1) copy of the prior SEPA Checklist for the fueling facility 6. Five (5) copies of Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated October 13, 2014 7. Five (5) copies of the Diesel Conceptual Landscape Plan (24- by 36 -inch format) prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated October 9, 2014. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • TUMWATER, WA • LONG BEACH, CA • ROSEVILLE, CA • SAN DIEGO, CA www.barghausen.com Minnie Dhaliwal Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila Community Development -2- October 13, 2014 8. Five (5) copies of the Diesel Grading and Drainage Exhibit (24- by 36 -inch format) prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated October 13, 2014 9. One (1) set of reduced Plans (11- by 17 -inch format) 10. One (1) check issued by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $607.95, payable to the City of Tukwila. Please complete your review as soon as possible. Please contact me (425) 251-6222 if you have any questions or comments. Thank you for your review of this application. Respectfully, Matt Cyr, LEED AP Project Planner MC/dm 7880c.041.doc enc: As Noted cc: David H Rogers, Costco Wholesale Ed Galliway, MulvannyG2 Architecture Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Chris S. Ferko, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Chris M. Tebaldi, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Date: 05/12/2014 Lacy of i uicwua tort Screening unecicust City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist RECEIVED OCT 14 2014 Applicant Name: Street Address: 999 Lake Drive City, State, Zip: Issaquah, WA 98027 NT Costco Wholesale Telephone: DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checldist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. H:\Land Use Applications in PDFSEPA Environmcntal Review Application-)an2011.doc Page 1 COof Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 1 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on-site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 1 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundeover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete 1 YES — Checklist Complete H:1Land Usc Applications in PDF\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l I.doc Page 2 ( of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. it NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1-3 if YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) ✓ YES - Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) 1 YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) H:\and Use Applications in PDCISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20I 1.doc Page 3 tof Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) 1 YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. INO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) 11:1Land Use Applications in PDPISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 4 0 tof Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross-sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. 1 NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 H:1Cand Use Applications in PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20I 1.doc Page 5 Cif Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) H:U..and Ilse Applications in PAFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.doc Page 6 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Soulhcenler Boulevarcl, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: 006) 431-3670 FAX• 006) 431-3665 E-mail: 1'lcnurinOl!Tukmihi ll'A.gov r ECEIVED OCT 14 2014 (.O(JU iivl l T DEVLLO MENT AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. 1 ani the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. • 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. 13 EXECUTED at Issaquah (city), WA (state), on ane , 20 pydE9EWARGIrjEcrs VAVlot H Y 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027 ss On this day personally appeared before me executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed t �e purposes mentioned therein. / SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS � / 17 1 DAY OF(JL& i (Print Name) (Address) (425) VIDO ZDVtC -\ g0 e-( eJ to me known to be the individual who me as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and JENNIFER J. SPADAFORA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WWA S1-IiNGTON COMMtSS(ON EXPIRES NOVEI\1dR 19, 2013 .c_ ,20 I�? NOTA PWIC i and for re S,j to of Washil),tbn residing at _YX1.. 41--t_� VL -tt) (i)I My Commission expires on //—/e7 I1:1L:mc USC Applientions in PUTADcsign Rctii v.Public He.iring-J1112O1Ldoc COMPLTE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional infonnation as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1 1. Application Checldist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 1 2. Completed ESA Screening Checldist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). 1 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". 1 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. 1 PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: To be completed 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 1 7. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. ✓ 8. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. H:\Land Use Applications In PDFISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc Check items submitted with application Information Requd. May be waived in unusual cases, uponroval of both Public Works and Planning PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: ✓ 9. Vicinity Map with site location. N/A 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. ✓ 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". H:U.and Use Applications In PDF\.SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 .FAX:: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning@TukwilaWA.gov RECEIVED R�_ OCT 14 201KPA J&1RONMENTAL DEVELOPVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: File Number: Application Complete Date: Project File Number: Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3623049107 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: E-mail: mcyr@barghausen.com Signature: Date: 05/12/2014 (425) 251-6222 FAX: (425) 251-8782 H:1Land Use Applications In PAFSEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Doc CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 14 2014 SEPA Department of Community Developtkentui,f0L14 r 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 ENVIRONMENTAL Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 REVIEW E-mail: planning(a�TukwilaWA.gov APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition '� 0035 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3623049107 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: (425) 251-6222 FAX: (425) 251-8782 E-mail: mcyr@barghausen.com Signature: H:\ and Use Applications In PDF \SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I .Doc Date: 10/13/2014 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: I_ti, uiti 13� ivi til File Number: -e-4.- � ,�• go L Application Complete Date: Project File Number: L! Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: /14, 6 () ) q NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition '� 0035 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3623049107 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: (425) 251-6222 FAX: (425) 251-8782 E-mail: mcyr@barghausen.com Signature: H:\ and Use Applications In PDF \SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I .Doc Date: 10/13/2014 0 4 KNORELINE SETBACK ENCROACHMENT EXHIa i PROPOSED PIPING /SAWCUT LINE 28.0 NN 200' SETBACK FROM OHWM NEW SIGN NEW CURB PROPOSED 1.500 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL ADDITIVE STORAGE TANK PROPOSED 20.000 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL STORAGE TANK NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT 0 2.5 5 10 COSTCO SITE —' ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY GREE WEST VALEEy HIGHWpy VER 2 NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP NTS LEGEND HATCH DENOTES LIMITS OF WORK WITHIN 200' SHOREUNE SETBACK ENCROACHMENT DATA SUMMARY: ASPHALT/CONCRETE AREA: 240 5F CURBING: 12 Li VERTICAL DATUM NAW 88 RECEIVED OCT 14 2014 Cc)t mum 1 v DEVELOPMENT FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION 8 Q o U ROOD INFORMATION DESIGNATION OF THE 11000 2ONE IS 'V AND DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 5303300978 F. COMMUNITY NUMBER 530091 (CITY OF TUKWILA), PANEL NUMBER 978, SUFFIX F. EFFECTIVE YAY 16, 1995, KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. THIS DATA 15 REAFFIRMED BY FIRM MAPS NOT YET ADOPTED BUT PUBUSHED BY KING COUNTY 8000 SERVICES AND RETRIEVED FROM THEIR WEBSITE ON DECEMBER 15. 2010. Know what's below. CaII before you dig. Dial 811 RUN OMR= HMS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION. AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHOUNG THE UTO.ITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR 70 CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 811 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW 01711.00 CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS ExIS7. LOCATIONS OF SAID UT UTIE5 AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BARGHAuSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ti 0 N W lQ LJ 1. LJ 0.1 o c0 Z rn ID 00 N Q I I I.- u7 N • Z c N Z N03 LJ Date/T me:5/20/2074 1 0 r-20'-0' O 10 20 40 0 DIE L - CONCEPTUAL SE LANDSCAPE PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE FUEL FACILITY ADDITION 400 COSTCO DRIVE, TUKWILA, WA 91406 COSTCO FACILITY NO. 6 O '21 -..---_-.171111M6111PAIWOMINSIMMIONIIIIMII Bight WMWROM war war Mgr Mir UIQ` 84 DOMING TREE FROM 2014 01PA 450N TO REMAIN TYPICAL EX. CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE VC— r ¶ I N -181V- fun EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED tr IV EXISTING TREE N MICAL 55,21. \-0115.00' S 86.22.15' E 302.95' �0 0 (J COSTCO SITE —\ WEST VA'-LEYHIGHWAY ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP NTS LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SUE CONDITION SPACING QUANTITY REMARKS SWBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMES \ 1 V ` o %� / l �/ O ® .:•••:.:• TREES: WIUS PARK 11114 'DER r / AUEE EW COMING TREE NEW TREE PER 2014 07)41901 PING D3Sn10 TREE SHRUBS: OSMANTI#1s O 10)401 / ODAVAY 058140X00 GR0UND110VER5: VPN`A 1@IOR / DWARF PD8W7fA0E EIGSING LOA WE MD sascAn191 COSTING LANDSCAPE AW nacanori 2• CA. B R B CALPEA SHOWN 2 L CAPER SHOWN 30' — 38' 4 POT AS 9%OWN SHOWN A5 gWN AS SUM B' 0.C. 2 AS SHOWN 10 4 3 AS REOT/ '.i I I S AIQA & GUY ONE GROWING SFASOI1 NURSERY GROWN FOR STREET TREE USE, BRANCHED AT r TO REMAIN, SAVE, MID PROTECT TO 904481, SAVE, AND PROTECT TO BE ROMEO MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM, FULL AND BUSHY, PLAIDED WRFWN THE EIUS5NG LANDSCAPE TO TIL N OPEN AREAS HOED 10' FROM 8W✓DOS, 9QEIB5, AND TREES TO REIN, SAVE Aro PROTECT 10 BE REMOVED so 03 83 0 LL STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARC Know what's below. CaII before you dig. Dial 811 t1MY COtFFCT NOTE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFIING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL DOSIING UIILIIIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT 8Y POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERT1C41 LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHAM INCLUDE CALLNG UTILIY LOCATE 0 811 AND THEN POIHOUNG AL OF THE DOSING U11LI11E5 AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UIIUTY CROSSINGS TO PHYSIGVMY WRIFY WHEn1FR OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SVD UTIu11E5 A5 SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BARGLUIJSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING MAIM CONSTRUCTION. N N DO 4 - • e a: �e 00 0ete/Tirne:10/9/2014 ineering\4014 Diesel Expansion\7880- rq� �p a T POWER j VAULT .a6'S9 26.65 f- • 4.7yAPLE II,-SDCO 26.57 T LIGHT (,2O.59- 26.81x ,35 VENTS / r" 1Lt10 ; 7.256.91 4\786'92VAPOR BOX rx27.:2, x 27.46.78.!7.46 27.11 x 27 •'.99 -. 27. 702 SIGN x 27 06 n SIGN \ 2727SINGLE WHITE STRJ 26.56 26.5959 ) (6)3' DIA. I FILL LIDS 0 DIESEL GRADING AND DRAINAGE EXHIBIT 0 26 NILE WHITE STRIPE 27.04 SINGLE WHITE STRII- PROPOSED OVERHANG l,1\fO!UV0 ° ' • L°PUMP° ° ISL 1a4D (TY P./) ° 26.82 ° z 41 / ° , \° .. a*me o i II 27.0127.0 ° 1 11 27 O2 °\ Yj• }F: ,° a ° 2 9 °^ cl. 15.Vl'J4PC 26.39 26.92 LOT LIGHT 4" MAPLE 6 98 7.2\\ 27.27 ( 61 CB STD GRATE TYPE I RIM=26.30' 8" D.I. I.E. E=24.30' 3" MAPLE 25.93 25.71 5.72 .172 9.5" MAPLE r 27.27 36 452SAWCUT UNE 977.39 73SSINGLE WHITE STRIP N N 8.9" MAPLE BUILDING ON CONC. PAD 27.50 200' SETBACKCK \ FROM OHWM 27.33 27.09 27.22 27.31 19 1T LIGHT L 3" L 9.9" MAPLE 1 LOT LIGHT \\ 768 \ 5.45 ,25.62 27.25 EX. CONTROLLER G 8CAMIIRE POSTS 57 277 1277 .47 ° 27.8' 88 5.2" MAPLE 27.34 27.56 1.>2Z.St k NEW CURB BOLLARD (TYP.) 7 5°S `27.45 27.42 10TLI HT niSAWCUTE EIN 27.04 2L11 ME27.44 ME 4477 1-10' 0 5 10 20 mom 26.06 21 125.88 25.89 !26.02 ME SAWCUT UNE NEW SIGN LG L_ 27.54 REMOVE EX. CURB PROPOSED 1,500 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL ADDITIVE STORAGE TANK LIGHT GUARD POST. TYP PROPOSED 20,000 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL STORAGE TANK 27.49 ME .44 NEW CURB \ 26.62 ) COSTCO SITE ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY NOT TO SCALE GREE WEST VALE y HIGHWAY )VER VICINITY MAP NTS DISTURBED AREA SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA - 2.987 51 EXISTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 2.554 5F 2,918 5F PERVIOUS: 433 SF 69 SF EARTHWORK OUANTTflES CUT. 440 CU. YDS FILL. 240 CU. YDS EXPORT- 110 CU. YDS IMPORT. 0 CU. YDS VERTICAL DATUM NAVD 88 : 5 c3FL00D INFORMATION O \S DESIGNATION OF THE FLOOD ZONE 15 'X- AND DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAN ,f) ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 5303300978 1, COMMUNITY NUMBER 530091 lP (CITY OF TUKWILA). PANEL NUMBER 978, SUFFIX F, EFFECTIVE MAY 16. 1995, KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. THIS DATA IS REAFFIRMED BY FIRM MAPS NOT YET ADOPTED BUT PUBLISHED BY KING COUNTY FLOOD SERVICES AND RETRIEVED FROM THEIR WEBSITE ON DECEMBER 15. 2010. 5!7.2707 NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT 26 97 UST SAWCUT LINE 6.88 _ 26.68' 26.62 \\ 26.61 36LOCUST t x 269'} UST E I 30' 30' 80 ,-26.00 LOT LIGHT - 2682 6.?6i.04 26.78 266 12.3" MAPLE LOT LIGHT W Q a 4 9.3" PINE PECE!VED OCT 14 2014 OE VLLUNMENT Know what's below. Call before you dig. Dial 811 LL wry =RIM Note: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTIUUES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHOLING THE UTIUTIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL MND VERTICAL LOCATION PR10R TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 811 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR 1.10T CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILMES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBUC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFUCTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. PM Scale:0.990099 B O o T COSTCO FUELING STATION 451 COSTCO DRIVE PL14-0023 L14-0035 - DR -ADMIN E14-0009 - SEPA C K LST E14-0014 - SEPA ADDENDUM L14-0035 DESIGN REVIEW - ADMINISTRATIVE July 29, 2014 O City of f Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Mr. Matt Cyr Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Ave S Kent, WA 98032 Re: Minor modification to the Board of Architectural Review approved design for the addition of diesel fuel to the Costco Fueling Facility at 451 Costco Drive. File no. L14-0035 (original design review under file no. L13-038) Dear Mr. Cyr: Based upon the plans and information submitted in connection with your request for a minor modification to the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approval, I hereby approve the proposed changes subject to conditions listed at the end of this letter. BACKGROUND A Notice of Decision dated August 28, 2013 under Tukwila land use file number L13-038 was issued approving the design of an expansion of the existing Costco fueling facility which included an additional row of gasoline dispensers providing six fueling positions, a 29 -foot by 88 -foot fueling island canopy extension, and associated site improvements. Site improvements included removal and reconfiguration of some of the parking and landscape islands located between the fueling facility and the Costco Optical facility in order to expand the vehicle queuing space for the fueling facility. Costco is proposing to add diesel to its fueling facility. Work for this project includes installation of one 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST), installation of one 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, product piping to equip existing fuel dispensers with diesel dispensing, removal of asphalt and curbed landscape areas including removal of four trees, removal of one light standard, repaving and reconstruction of curbs, and installation of bollards, two trees, four shrubs, and groundcover within the newly curbed landscape areas. The City received this request for a minor modification to the approved design and plans reflecting the revised design in May 2014. COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL APPROVED DESIGN 1. Site Plan The new diesel USTs are proposed on the south side of the fueling facility, in an area that is currently a curbed landscape area. Curbs, landscaping, and one light standard will be removed as JR Page 1 of 3 07/29/2014 H:\Design Review\Costco Gas Station\Diesel Addition SEPA & Minor Mod\SR_CostcoDiesel_L14-0035_Minor Modification.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206- 431-3665 part of this modification so that the USTs can be installed within this area. The landscape area was chosen for the location of the USTs to minimize queuing conflicts during fuel deliveries. During fuel deliveries, automobiles will still be able to access fueling pumps, but the through drive aisle will be blocked by parked fuel delivery vehicles. A drive aisle for the Costco Optical employee parking area is on the south side of the curbed landscape area that will be removed. Guard posts are proposed to separate circulation areas for the fueling facility from the drive aisle of the optical facility. 2. Building Design There are no changes to the building design proposed as part of this modification. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment The applicant is requesting to modify the landscaping by removing portions of the landscape island along the south side of the fueling facility to accommodate the diesel USTs. Approximately 319 square feet of landscape area would be permanently removed from the site and would become impervious surface as part of construction of the diesel addition. Because the fueling facility and the optical facility are located on the same parcel, this landscape area is not a required perimeter landscape area but was approved through design review. Four Red Maple trees ranging in caliper from 2.5 to 3.1 inches will be removed. A curbed landscape area will remain on both the east and west sides of the area where the UST's will be located and two new Allee Elm trees will be replanted in the reconstructed curbed landscape areas (see attached Diesel Grading and Drainage Exhibit). Two shrubs will be planted in the area where each new tree will be planted, and groundcover will also be added to these reconstructed curbed landscape areas (see attached Conceptual Landscape Plan). As part of the design approved by the Board of Architectural Review under L13-038, a continuous curbed landscape area was added on the west and south sides of the fueling facility to separate circulation areas of the fueling facility from the parking area of the optical facility. The new landscape areas on the west and south sides of the fueling facility include a continuous row of Allee Elm trees, shrubs, and groundcover. The new landscape area is connected to a landscape area on the south side of the fueling facility that already existed. The area that already existed is the area subject to the current modification. Consistent with the original design review findings in L13-038, (1) the use of Allee Elm trees will serve to continue the visual pattern which emphasizes the vehicular circulation pattern within the fueling facility; (2) the new trees will provide canopy for shade, and (3) the revised landscape areas will provide screening. 4. Miscellaneous Structures One light standard is proposed to be removed with this modification. There is no lighting proposed to replace the light standard that will be removed. The recent fueling canopy expansion added lighting for fuel facility visitors in the area where the light standard will be removed. There is an existing light pole to the south of the fueling facility that provides lighting for the optical facility parking area. 7R Page 2 of 3 07/29/2014 H:\Design Review\Costco Gas Station\Diesel Addition SEPA & Minor Mod\SR_CostcoDiesel_L14-0035_Minor Modification.doc DECISION The proposed revisions to the approved design are considered minor modifications as permitted under 18.60.030 (E). This request for minor modification to the Board of Architectural Review -approved design is approved. APPEAL PROCESS This decision is a Type 1 decision that may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner. The Permit Application Types and Procedures chapter of the City's Zoning Code, Classification of Project Permit Applications section 18.104.010, outlines the authorization and process for appeal. If you have any questions, please contact the project planner, Jaimie Reavis, at 206-431-3659. Sincerely, t °Jack Pace Director, Department of Community Development Enclosures: 1. Diesel Grading and Drainage Exhibit 2. Conceptual Landscape Plan JR Page 3 of 3 07/29/2014 H:\Design Review\Costco Gas Station\Diesel Addition SEPA & Minor Mod\SR_CostcoDiesel_L14-0035_Minor Modification.doc Fueling Facility Diesel Fuel Addition Costco Wholesale 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 APN No. 362304-9107 Costco Loc. No. 6 May 20, 2014 001 PROJECT NARRATIVE Overview The addition of diesel fuel to the Tukwila Costco fueling facility will include one (1) 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST), one (1) 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, product piping to equip six (6) multi -product dispensers with diesel dispensing, and associated site improvements. The addition will require a Type I Minor Modification to Design Review City Permit No. L13-038, which expanded the fueling facility to eleven (11) multi -product gasoline dispensers (22 fueling positions). The USTs will be located to the south of the fueling facility, and site improvements include the replacement of pavement in the immediate area and a slight reduction in landscaping. Operation The fueling facility will continue to operate as approved under the existing land use approvals, with regard to the hours of operation and staffing levels. Grading The tank holes for the additional USTs will be shored to minimized impacts to the site. Approximately 350 cubic yards of material will be excavated to accommodate the UST installation. The impervious area for the site will increase by 319 square feet with this. A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (Shoreline Setback). A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. Parking and Circulation The parking and circulation improvements associated with the fueling facility expansion will not be impacted by the diesel service addition. Transportation The fueling facility is a members only accessory component to Costco's operation. Since approximately two (2) percent of vehicles on the road are powered by diesel fuel, the addition of diesel service is not anticipated to generate a significant number of additional member trips to the fueling facility. Project Narrative and Justification 2014-05-20.doc Page 1 Landscaping and Lighting The installation of the USTs will remove approximately 319 square feet of landscaping and approximately two (2) trees. One (1) Tight standard will be removed with this addition. Construction Construction of the diesel addition and associated site improvements will be completed in a single phase and commence after approval of the applicable permits. The addition will be separate from the expansion. The existing fueling facility will remain open during construction of the expansion, and night construction will be proposed through an extension of Noise Variance Permit No. A13-018. DESIGN REVIEW JUSTIFICATION The City of Tukwila Community Development Director is the deciding body for this Design Review Minor Modification. The City of Tukwila Municipal Code Section 18.60.050 identifies Design Review Criteria that must be addressed for the project. The following identifies criteria specific to commercial development, along with our justification response to each criteria: 1. Relationship of Structure to Site a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. RESPONSE: The existing fueling facility is located on the southwest corner of Costco Drive and Christensen Drive, both private drives. The project is separated from both drives by a pedestrian sidewalk and mature landscaping. The mature landscaping includes trees, shrubs, and groundcover which provide a filtered screen transition for the site. The diesel service addition does not impact the existing streetscape. b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. RESPONSE: The existing landscape frontage along Costco Drive and Christensen Drive is consistent with current parking lot landscape screening standards. The parking within the project area will not be impacted by the diesel service addition. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will not impact the fueling canopy or controller enclosure. Project Narrative and Justification 2014-05-20.doc Page 2 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area a. Harmony in texture, line and masses is encouraged. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will not impact the fueling canopy or controller enclosure. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. RESPONSE: The landscape transition to the adjoining property south of the fueling facility includes existing trees, shrubs, and ground cover at the perimeter of the property. This landscaping between the south adjoining property and fueling facility exceeds the landscaping requirements for the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) zone and is not impacted by the diesel service addition. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will not impact the fueling canopy or controller enclosure. d. Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. RESPONSE: The fueling facility is located on the periphery of the Costco site, away from pedestrian circulation patterns, to provide safe separation of pedestrian and auto -oriented uses. The diesel service addition will place additional USTs on the periphery of the facility to minimize queuing conflicts during fuel deliveries. e. Compatibility of on-site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: The existing driveways to Costco Drive and Christensen Drive will remain unchanged with the diesel service addition. Access to the fueling facility will be from the Costco Drive driveway. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patters contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will involve minimal site grading. Existing topographic patters will be maintained. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. RESPONSE: The project will maintain the existing minimal slopes within walking, parking, and other paved areas. Project Narrative and Justification 2014-05-20.doc Page 3 c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. RESPONSE: Existing landscaping includes frontage trees spaced approximately 20 feet apart, evergreen shrubs, ground cover, parking lot trees within planter islands, perimeter trees and landscaping adjacent to the south property line, and trees along the south side of the fueling facility. The recent expansion further enhanced landscaping within the site. The project will remove approximately four (4) existing trees and provide approximately two (2) new trees between the fueling facility and south parking lot. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. RESPONSE: All existing and proposed landscaping within the project area is protected by a raised curb as required by the Zoning Code to protect plants from motor traffic. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. RESPONSE: The existing site contains trees and shrubs along the street frontage and within parking lot landscape islands. The project will remove two (2) internal site trees. This reduction is offset by recent installation of additional trees and landscape islands with the fueling facility expansion. f. Screening of service yards and other places, which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter or summer. RESPONSE: The site has been screened according to City Code requirements with frontage trees and evergreen shrubs. Ground -mounted mechanical equipment has also been screened to the City's standards. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and paving of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. RESPONSE: Other materials are not proposed at this time. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will require the removal of one (1) parking lot lighting standard. No other lighting revisions are proposed with this project. 4. Building Design Project Narrative and Justification 2014-05-20.doc Page 4 a. Architectural style is not restricted; evaluation of a project should be based on quality of design and relationship to surroundings. Response: The diesel service addition will not impact the existing canopy or controller enclosure. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. Response: The diesel service addition will not impact the existing canopy or controller enclosure. c. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will not impact the existing canopy or controller enclosure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will not impact the existing canopy or controller enclosure. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings should be screened from view. RESPONSE: The project will screen ground -mounted vapor recovery equipment with landscape screening per the City's Zoning Code. The diesel UST and additive UST vents will not be screened, but are located within the site and screened by the site frontage landscaping. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. RESPONSE: One (1) exterior light standard will be removed with this project. The remaining exterior lighting, approved with expansion, will remain. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and fitting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: The diesel service addition will not impact the existing canopy or controller enclosure that was approved with the recent expansion. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. Project Narrative and Justification 2014-05-20.doc Page 5 RESPONSE: The existing fueling facility is located on the southeast corner of two (2) private drives with large commercial retailers and manufactures in the vicinity. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture are not proposed with this project, as this project adds diesel service to an existing auto -oriented use and does not front a public right-of-way. b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape, and buildings. RESPONSE: Existing parking lot and canopy lighting will remain. No changes to lighting along the private streets fronting the fueling facility are proposed with this project. 6. Consistency with adopted plans and regulations (TMC 18.100.030): Demonstrate the manner in which the proposal is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila's Development Regulations and other official laws, policies and objectives for the City of Tukwila. RESPONSE: The City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map designate the site as Tukwila Urban Center. The recent fueling facility expansion was designed to be consistent with this designation. The proposed diesel service addition further enhances the value of the existing fueling facility by providing greater fueling product selection. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goal for urban development projects: Goal 10.2 Urban Development — Encourage and allow a central focus for the Tukwila Urban Center, with natural and built environments that are attractive, functional, and distinctive, and that support a range of mixed uses promoting business, shopping, recreation, entertainment, and residential opportunities. The policies associated with this goal address site design, parking, building design, and economic development with the intent of encouraging well-designed projects that support business in the zone. The expansion was scaled to effectively and efficiently service current and anticipated future member demands, and the diesel service addition expands the range of service available to members. The facility is supported by a well-designed internal network of vehicle drive aisles and private roads that allow for vehicle circulation. The expansion was also designed to separate the queuing area from the parking area to further alleviate congestion. While the fueling facility is intentionally separated from pedestrian paths to avoid pedestrian conflicts with this auto -oriented use, pedestrian paths remain located along Costco Drive and Christensen Drive. These pedestrian paths also provide access to the Green River Trail to encourage pedestrian connectivity. The expansion contained several features that improved the attractiveness and efficiency of the facility, and this product addition will enhance the product selection/service Costco is able to provide to the surrounding area at a scale that is appropriate for present and forecasted demand. CONCLUSION: Based on the forgoing responses to Design Review approval criteria, the Department of Community Development Director is justified in approving this Minor Modification to Design Review application L13-038. Project Narrative and Justification 2014-05-20.doc Page 6 Minnie Dhaliwal Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila Community Development 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING May 21, 2014 COURIER DELIVERY (206) 431-3685 RE: Administrative Design Review Application Costco Wholesale Retail Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, Washington 98188 Costco Loc. No. 6 / Our Job No. 7880 Dear Minnie: HAY 21 2014 PERMIT CENTER On behalf of our client Costco Wholesale (Costco), Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. is submitting an Administrative Design Review Application for the above -referenced project. The application is for a minor modification of land use approval L13-038. We understand the project will require Community Development Director approval. The diesel product addition will consist of installation of one (1) 15,000 -gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST), one (1) 1,500 -gallon diesel additive UST, diesel product piping to six (6) existing multi -product gasoline dispensers (twelve fueling positions), and minor site revisions. Site revisions include the removal of two (2) interior parking lot trees and a minor landscape area reduction. A small portion of the work will occur within the Urban Conservancy Environment (Shoreline Setback). A Shoreline Setback Encroachment Exhibit and Engineer's Cost Estimate has been prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. to demonstrate that the work within the Shoreline Setback qualifies for a shoreline exemption under WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), because the value of the work within the Shoreline Buffer is less than $6,416.00. The following items are enclosed for your Design Review: 1. One (1) completed Application Checklist 2. Five (5) copies of the Signed Application Form 3. Five (5) copies of the SEPA Checklist Application 4. One (1) set of reduced Plans (11" x 17") 5. One (1) check issued by Costco Wholesale in the amount of $2,399.25, payable to the City of Tukwila. Fees include Administrative Design Review ($640.50) and SEPA Checklist review ($1,758.75). 6. One (1) signed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership 7. One (1) mailing label list 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (425) 251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES • TUMWATER, WA • LONG BEACH, CA • WALNUT CREEK, CA • SAN DIEGO, CA www.barghausen.com STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Departnieilt of Community Development 6300 Soulhcenler Boulevard, Tulnvila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planningTuklvila!VA.gov AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: rpt CF C.D MAY 81 2014 1. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. r, 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and Jcorrect tortnrerast of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 451 Cos tco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the Toss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED + Issaquah (city)WA (elate), on X20 13 pyo. s 9Avld H (yr s 999 Lake Drive Issaquah, WA 98027 (Print Name) (Address) (425) lam- (Phone Number) (Signature) v On this day personally appeared before me 2F.V 10k l 1 go S to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed t to s me as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS aNi71 l DAY celjwi'c , 20 JZ JENNIFER J. SPADAFORA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 19. 2013 VV./ ./ V W ..... NOT ' 8 residing at 1 )21 Ada IC i and for e S to Qf shit . n 1—/C? —1 f My Commission expires on H:1Land Use Applications in PDF\Design Review -Public Hearing-Jan201 I.doc ICJ Staff will meet with you as needed to help achieve project goals, and formulate a recommendation to the Director. Once all design issues have been resolved we will issue a Notice of Decision. This approval will expire unless construction begins within three years of the decision. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 1 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). 1 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". 1 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule online. 1 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 1 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist if required (see SEPA Application Packet) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: To be pr ov i de d 7. If the project requires SEPA review: Payment of notice board fee (see Land Use Fee Schedule) to Fast Signs Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). Mailed notice is not required. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: N/A 8. Concurrency test notices for water, sewer, surface water and traffic unless the project is exempt from SEPA (see SEPA Application Packet). N/A 9. Sewer and water availability letters are required from the provider district if additional plumbing fixtures are proposed and the area is not serviced by the City of Tukwila. Forms are available at the DCD office. 1 10. A written discussion of project consistency with decision criteria. (See Application) N/A 11. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. \\deptstore\dcd common$\Applications-Handouts, Land Use\2014 WEBSITE\March 2014 (Corrected Fast Signs fee)\LAND USE-WORD-docx\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.docx March 24, 2011 Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning SITE PLAN: ✓ 12 (a) The site plan must include a graphic scale, north arrow and project name. Maximum size 24" x 36". ✓ (b) Existing and proposed building footprints. ✓ (c) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. ✓ (d) Fire access lanes and turn-arounds per Fire Department standards. ✓ (e) Parking lots with dimensioned stalls and drive aisles. N/A (f) Loading and service areas. N/A (g) Fences, rockeries and retaining walls with called out colors and materials. N/A (h) Street furniture such as benches and bike racks. N/A (i) Pedestrian connections between the building entrance(s) and the sidewalk/public street. N/A (j) In MDR and HDR zones provide a development coverage calculation (maximum 50%). V (k) Show all existing and proposed easements. ✓ (1) Vicinity Map with site location does not have to be to scale. LANDSCAPE PLAN: ✓ 13 (a) If the landscaping will be altered or the existing landscaping does not meet current standards (TMC 18.52) provide a landscape planting plan by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. One set of all plans and analyses shall have an original Washington State registered Landscape Architect stamp and signature. Plans must include the type, quantity, spacing and location of all plantings. Maximum size 24" x 36". N/A (b) Show all existing trees to be retained and any tree protection measures required (for example fencing at drip line). SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN (If the project will affect any sensitive areas): ✓ 14 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20%, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum size 24" x 36". ✓ (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. N/A (c) Show all significant trees (4" or more in diameter measured 4.5 feet above grade), indicating those to be retained and those to be removed. A tree permit will be required for removal of any significant trees within a sensitive area or its buffer. V (d) Existing and proposed building footprints. \\deptstore\dcd commonS\Applications-Handouts, Land Use\2014 WEBSITE\March 2014 (Corrected Fast Signs fee)\LAND USE-WORD-docx\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.docx March 24, 2011 Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning CIVIL PLANS (If utility or site work is proposed): ✓ 15 (a) One set of all civil plans and analyses shall be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer. Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum size 24" x 36". 1 (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. 1 (c) Existing (dashed) and proposed (solid) topography at 2' intervals. 1 (d) Total expected cut and fill. 1 (e) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. N/A (f) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Include a Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis if required by the Manual. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. For additional guidance contact Public Works or go to http://www.tukwilawa.gov/pubwks/pwpermit.html. 1 (g) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. N/A (h) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. N/A (i) Plan, profile and cross-section for any right-of-way improvements. 1 (j) Show planned access to buildings, driveways, fire access lanes and turn-arounds. OTHER: N/A 16. Dimensioned and scalable building elevations with keyed colors and materials. Show mechanical equipment and/or any proposed screening. Maximum size 24" x 36". N/A 17. Color and materials board accurately representing the proposed project. N/A 18. A rendering or photo montage showing the project in context is suggested. If submitted it must accurately show the project and be from a realistic perspective (5 to 6 feet above the sidewalk). N/A 19. Luminaire plan including location and type of street and site lighting if any changes to the existing fixtures are proposed. Include proposed fixture cut sheets, site light levels (foot-candles), and measures to shield adjacent properties from glare. N/A 20. All existing and proposed signage with sign designs and locations. \\deptstore\dcd common$\Applications-Handouts, Land Use\2014 WEBSITE\March 2014 (Corrected Fast Signs fee)\LAND USE-WORD-docx\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.docx March 24, 2011 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX: (206) 431-3665 E-mail: planning(a,TukwilaWA.gov DESIGN REVIEW - ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -DR Planner: --it (s1 I *e gay, °s File Number: 0- y _ av 35— 5— Application Application Complete Date: 6/z eq1201 t.x / Project File Number: -'Ll Li - 0v2..3 Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: F , ii_ two Li 3 _ U 3 g NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Costco Fueling Facility Diesel Product Addition LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 451 Costco Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 3623049107 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Matt Cyr) Address:18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: (425) 251-6222 E-mail: mcyr@barghausen.com FAX: (425) 251-8782 Signature: Date: 05/20/2014 \\deptstore\dcd commonS\Applications-Handouts, Land Use\2014 WEBSITE\March 2014 (Corrected Fast Signs fee)\LAND USE-WORD-docx\Design Review-Administrative-Jan2011.docx March 24, 2011 VICINITY MAP 0 EXISTING VIP ,2 SUITE 150 -tJ COSTCO DRIVE Tom, PROPERTY LINE N LI 3 '-0' EXISTINQ SOPY OV 1 EXISTING REGIONAL OPTICAL FACILITY 441 COSTCO DRIVE ri I J Tr 122-r TIL COSTCO WHOLESALE I b b 1 0 0 0 IN I 0 C4 -o-} w 11 NEW CONCRETE TANK PAD NEW 1,500 GALLON ADDMVE UST DEMO EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND LIGHT STANDARD IN THIS AREA NEW 15,000 GALLON DIESEL FUEL UST ■ ■ s 20E1 SETBACK FROM OHWM h 41'r \ \ I /I rI I I Vi 1 i, t, 1 \, ,\i 11 '. \\\ ``\ 'I \\, %L ' 1\ \` 100' SETBACK FROM OHWM____ \ 1 1 PROPS TY UNE EXISTING F ----- l t 0 iIr 11 1\, l 1 I ) LAND USE SITE PLAN PROJECT DATA CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 WAREHOUSE SITE AREA: 13.93 ACRES (606,591 S.F.) OPTICAL SITE AREA: 4.28 ACRES (186,232 S.F.) TOTAL SITE AREA: 18.21 ACRES (792,823 S.F.) BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING BARGHAUSEN CIVIL DWG DATED 6-24-99. EXISTING BUILDING DATA (WAREHOUSE): EXISTING BUILDING AREA EXISTING TIRE INSTALLATION EXISTING BALER ROOM EXISTING TOTAL BUILDING 206,910 S.F. 2,453 S.F. 2,903 S.F. 212,266 S.F. EXISTING PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): ( 10' WIDE STALLS 502 STALLS ® 9' WIDE STALLS 88 STALLS Q. HANDICAP STALLS 12 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (WHSE) 602 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA ;212,266 SF): 2.84 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (2.5 STALLS/ 1000 S.F.): 531 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): TOTAL PARKING (NO CHANGE) 602 STALLS EXISTING BUILDING DATA (OPTICAL): EXISTING OPTICAL FACILITY 34,544 S.F. EXISTING PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): 10. WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS HC HANDICAP STALLS 11 STALLS 151 STALLS 4 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (OPTICAL) 166 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA [34,544 SF): 4.81 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (1.0 STALLS /1000 S.F.): 35 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): ® 10' WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS © HANDICAP STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING 9 STALLS 147 STALLS 4 STALLS 160 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 134,544 SF): 4.63 STALLS JURISDICTION REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING EXTRA PARKING AVAILIBLE FOR WHSE 35 STALLS 160 STALLS 125 STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING (OVERALL) 762 STALLS TOTAL REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION 566 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA :246,810 SF): 3.09 STALLS 451 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 • _ .Z 1110 112TH AVE. NE I SUITE 500 _ BELLEVUE, WA 198004 Z. T ▪ > MulvannYG2.rom 4 1 7 1425.453.2000 11425.4632002 TUKWILA, WA MAY 8, 2014 93-044-28 MAY 5, 2014 LAND USE SITE PLAN J TUKWILA PKWY i § CCa i LP r r .LEY HWY c 0 rc U O 5 ¢ p Q ► I { ■ y CsTCU UN. s. VICINITY MAP 0 EXISTING VIP ,2 SUITE 150 -tJ COSTCO DRIVE Tom, PROPERTY LINE N LI 3 '-0' EXISTINQ SOPY OV 1 EXISTING REGIONAL OPTICAL FACILITY 441 COSTCO DRIVE ri I J Tr 122-r TIL COSTCO WHOLESALE I b b 1 0 0 0 IN I 0 C4 -o-} w 11 NEW CONCRETE TANK PAD NEW 1,500 GALLON ADDMVE UST DEMO EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND LIGHT STANDARD IN THIS AREA NEW 15,000 GALLON DIESEL FUEL UST ■ ■ s 20E1 SETBACK FROM OHWM h 41'r \ \ I /I rI I I Vi 1 i, t, 1 \, ,\i 11 '. \\\ ``\ 'I \\, %L ' 1\ \` 100' SETBACK FROM OHWM____ \ 1 1 PROPS TY UNE EXISTING F ----- l t 0 iIr 11 1\, l 1 I ) LAND USE SITE PLAN PROJECT DATA CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 WAREHOUSE SITE AREA: 13.93 ACRES (606,591 S.F.) OPTICAL SITE AREA: 4.28 ACRES (186,232 S.F.) TOTAL SITE AREA: 18.21 ACRES (792,823 S.F.) BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING BARGHAUSEN CIVIL DWG DATED 6-24-99. EXISTING BUILDING DATA (WAREHOUSE): EXISTING BUILDING AREA EXISTING TIRE INSTALLATION EXISTING BALER ROOM EXISTING TOTAL BUILDING 206,910 S.F. 2,453 S.F. 2,903 S.F. 212,266 S.F. EXISTING PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): ( 10' WIDE STALLS 502 STALLS ® 9' WIDE STALLS 88 STALLS Q. HANDICAP STALLS 12 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (WHSE) 602 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA ;212,266 SF): 2.84 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (2.5 STALLS/ 1000 S.F.): 531 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (WAREHOUSE): TOTAL PARKING (NO CHANGE) 602 STALLS EXISTING BUILDING DATA (OPTICAL): EXISTING OPTICAL FACILITY 34,544 S.F. EXISTING PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): 10. WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS HC HANDICAP STALLS 11 STALLS 151 STALLS 4 STALLS EXISTING TOTAL PARKING (OPTICAL) 166 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA [34,544 SF): 4.81 STALLS NO. OF STALLS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION (1.0 STALLS /1000 S.F.): 35 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING DATA (OPTICAL): ® 10' WIDE STALLS 9' WIDE STALLS © HANDICAP STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING 9 STALLS 147 STALLS 4 STALLS 160 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA 134,544 SF): 4.63 STALLS JURISDICTION REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING EXTRA PARKING AVAILIBLE FOR WHSE 35 STALLS 160 STALLS 125 STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING (OVERALL) 762 STALLS TOTAL REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION 566 STALLS NO. OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA :246,810 SF): 3.09 STALLS 451 COSTCO DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 • _ .Z 1110 112TH AVE. NE I SUITE 500 _ BELLEVUE, WA 198004 Z. T ▪ > MulvannYG2.rom 4 1 7 1425.453.2000 11425.4632002 TUKWILA, WA MAY 8, 2014 93-044-28 MAY 5, 2014 LAND USE SITE PLAN r ui / 2J .4 r Lx / x27. x 27.46',y - • 7.46 699 POWER ° VAULT 26.65 ;']MAPLE 26.nT LIGHT 26.8) VENTS 7..%91 7."4 88.9 2 2VAPOR BOX Q x 27.11 x 27 z x 27.06 x 27. SIG 19 )T LIGHT r 7'02 SIGN LnJ 36 DIESEL GRADING AND DRAINAGE EXHIBIT 5000 9 • 426.59 DIS. FILL FILL LIDS SD x 27.27 7.39 'O 7" LOCUST I ' a ;rvUrY 4 .e. >k 26.39 L`PUMP4 . . LOT LIGHT 9.4" MAPLE 5.93 26§0GLE WHITE STRIPE x 27.04 SINGLE WHITE STRI PROPOSED OVERHANG 2727SINGLE WHITE STRI �y Ax 27.3sSINGLE WHITE STRIP x � .3" MAPLE CB STD GRATE TYPE 1 RIM=26.30' 8" D.I. I.E. E=24.30' 89 5.71 7272 5.45 00 25.62 T-10' O 5 10 20 x 26.06 7.53 BUILDING ON CONC. PAD 7.89 27.50 r L 3" L ,CES \ E30' 80' 80' 22 200' SE1860 FROM OMTJ 7.33 LOT LIGHT x 27.34 27.56 27.06 27.25 GUARD POSTS EX. CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE 5.2" MAPLE BOLLARD (TYP ) 27.04 nit I L LOT'' LIN i' fiz47.69-_: 67.07 NE ASPHALT 27.07 PAVEMENT SAWCUT UNE RELOCATE EX. IAT LIGHT REMOVE Ex. CURB GUARD POST, TIP 27:641 PROPOSED .15,000 GALLON UNDERGROUND DIESEL. STORAGE TANK PROPOSED .1,500 G410N UNDERGROUND OESEL ADD1T1VE STORAGE TANK 1,10 SAWCUT UNE NEW SIGN 7.49 LIE NEW OMB NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT x 21 25.88 25.89 16.02 8 x 26.62 0 to 4.5' 4Q 2t \\65 26.6 7.43 26 -26.00 LOT LIGHT -\ 26.80 6.6.84 26.78 26.64 26.68 1 26.62 .61 6LOCUST 12.3" MAPLE LOT LIGHT 9.3" PINE j 8 COSTCO SITE 1 sTVA.0 fHIGHwAY ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP NTS DISTURBED AREA SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA - 2.826 SF EOSTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 2,451 SF 2,770 SF PERVIOUS: 375 SF 56 SF EARTHWORK OUANTTTIES CUT- 350 CU. YDS FILL- 240 CU. YDS EXPORT- 110 CU. YDS IMPORT- 0 CU. YDS VERTICAL DATUM NAVD 88 1 a p. 8 FUEL FACILITY EXPANSION Eo O CO I- • 3 CB U E FLOOD INFORMATION DESIGNATION OF THE FLOOD ZONE IS T AND DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAN ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 5303300978 F, COMMUNITY NUMBER 530091 ON OF TUKYALA), PANEL NUMBER 978, SUFFIX F, EFFECTIVE MAY 16, 1995, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THIS DATA S REAFFIRMED BY FIRM MAPS NOT YET ADOPTED BUT PUBLISHED BY KING COUNTY FLOOD SERACES AND RETRIEVED FROM THEIR WEBSITE ON DECEMBER 15, 2010. C n < w O 2a3 O JQ U O 2 0 g o 8 SI $ g i N 4.0 Z Know what's below. CaII before you dig. Dial 811 URRY COIAICT NOTE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLM5 OR NOT 8Y POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICIL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 811 AND THEN POTH0UNG ALL OF THE O05T1NG UIIUTIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONRJCTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTIUTIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ME BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION MID ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY RMGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. Date/Time:5/20/201 Fi Ie:P:\07000s\7880\exhibit\7880-01 1-20'-0' 0 10 20 40 0 720., 5' 0 b) 0 1 41 A�rL� 441, 4 itaharke&, law ywiri 0 DIESEL — CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE FUEL FACILITY ADDITION 400 COSTCO DRIVE, TUKWILA, WA 91406 COSTCO FACILITY NO. 6 OA GI- UMMENENI weipr- .`! U r f ,MM,i -111;L=-=\> I jELal -DA o• I I T 1 cT� f I]1j. 'qt.:1 l J I I LIMIT SOF WORK_ j I � • � • u 115 CY- MOW, I.COSSi 2.9 JLI EXISTNG TREE FROM 2014 EXPANSION TO REMAIN TYPICAL �*32cjM15 nom:, 5 EX. CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE •a l � L - pit Ci 114 PROPOSED UNDERGROUNDk � 1 01sRAGE TANK \ Oli Fe Xi k'110.131 111 CAL 1 W I j EXISTING TREE agTa10O14 1 TO BE REMOVED1 I'. TYPICAL — 1T7fFTA1J I11i 11' 10 Gt. EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN TYPICAL 1€0 S 0.322'15' E 502.9 COL 9.6 0 COSTCO 1a1 SITE —� ANDOVER PARK EAST SOUTHCENTER PKWY NOT TO SCALE CARO WEST VALLEY HIGHLyAY VER VICINITY MAP NTS LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SIZE CONDITION SPACING QUANTITY REMARKS SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMES \ / 0 TREES: ULMU5 PA MFMIA 'DER 6' / A11cc ELM DOSING TREE 2 COL B & 8 CA.IPER SHOWN A5 SHOWN 2 AS SHOWN � ��fj�� NEW TREE 2' GLPO0 A5 SHOWN 10 l\\Y/ PER 2014 E%PAISIDN PLANS EXISTING 1REE CALIPER 4 SHOWN SHRUBS: OSNAMHLS OEIAVAYI / 30' -36 AS SHOWN 4 ® DELAVAY 05MANTHU5 GROUNDCOVERS: VINO MINOR / 4' PGE 8' 0.C. A5 REO'D .•••••.:‘',....:3F DWARF PERIW680E COSTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION -1 EXSDNG LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION ,,,,,I UlLITYCCNFUCT NOTE 5F410: & CUT ONE GROWING SEASON; NURSERY GROWN FOR 1N¢LT TREE USE, BRANCHED AT 6' TO REAWN, SAYE, AND PROTECT TO REMAIN, 5AVE, AND PROTECT TO BE REARMED MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM, FULL AND BUSHY, NAMED WITHIN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO FILL IN OPEN AREAS HOLD 10' FROM BORDERS, SHRUBS, AND TREES 10 REIAMN, SAVE AND PROTECT TO BE REMOVED O 11 g w a 09z 0 goo5 E O Q O z LL o Y 0w I � J a° J 0 Jcc O o w 0 0 ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 u_I STATE OF WASH NGTO REGIS LANDSCAP UR. SEIDFy G (VALID ONLY 14 SIGNATURE) SIRES: 12/15/1, Know what's below. Call before you dig. Dial 811 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UDLRIE5 WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHOUNG 111E UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CAWNG UTILITY LOCATE O 811 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UDUTES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONDUCTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAO UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBUC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. CO E 2 N E - 90 10 0 LIMITED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25 AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 0 15' SIDE YARD B.S.B.L. CITY OF TUKWILA INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT REC. N0. 9608130150 E%C. 8 y1p41 ow* *..y$ 910 ill�!fI�I1lii� �: )111Th NGLE WHITE STRIPE LUMINA/RE N 88'68 2 ( W T 2d. LUMINAIRE ( STOP SIGN R.4+ TART 13.1 PNC CROSSWALK P 1v _ WATER J CB STD GRATE TYPE I II VALVE RIM=25.64' K 1r ADS I.E. W=23.29' 8' ADS I.6. E=23.39' SDCO CB STD GRATE TYPE 8114=26.25• 8" ADS LE. W=24.42' ® POWER VAULT , r ROOF DRAIN ROOF ORAN 271. ROOF DRAIN VAPOR 80% Isi40.(TrP,V" ROOF DRAIN C8 516 GRATE TYPE I PoM=26.30' 8" O.I. 1E. 0424.30' 9.51L485E PROPOSED CURB ,P SINGLE WHITE STRIPE SSINGLE WHITE STRIPE ■ MOLDING 01 00NC. PAD 186' 99 GUARD P0575 2' WPI( BOLLARD (IYP.) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 9 .8g *Py 2S' 1MPIfMIRY VAULTS r 28" WPI( 31 WPI( LOT LIGHT „fl LOT LIGHT ROOF 26 SPACES GUARD PEST\ uveal *Pq / CB STD GRATE TYPE I PoM=26.00' _ _ _ _ - - . 8' D.I. I.E E=23.80' 12" D.I. I.E. W=23.80' / ..-7' =--_-________ ,______-- moo LOT LIGHT „AS'. 55 21 S 88'2215 E 302.95' STOP MGN FIRE HYDRANT W/GUARD POSTS PATER VALVE ♦PP 200' SETBACK FROM OHWM RED MAPLE 12.4 CAL 1 0 10 20 40 1 1 1 1 1 -1.241111L.5 SCALE -V-20' LIMITED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY N 0 CU W Z W 2 CO CC CO LL Q O 00 M r ~ U N N Z W V Y W 1— O U. 00? z 1- CC W O 00>- • W~ < LEG 108192 VAULT TELEPHONE VA1L1 n WATER VAULT LUMIFYJRE E•}0 LOT LCHT )3( YARD LOW O POWER METER ® JUNCTION BOX (J800) ❑ CATCH 84011 (CO O STORM M A0011 (50141) O STORM QFJNOU1/ROOF DRAM O SNORT SEWER 44686E (5410) O SANMARY SEWER CLEANOUT (54%1) ® 046 METER DWV4 CJS VALVE (CV) 8ATER VALVE (VN) ?4 FRE CONNECTION • FRE HYDRANT (RI) e WATER MAINOIE EH WATER METER (1111) 4GN END B 5M0EY 11(46(89 (AS NOTED) SECTION CORNER (A5 NOTED) SET REBAR/CAP MARKED LS 45789 AT CORNER POSITION ASPHALT CONCRETE CRAWL 55 SUVARY SEWER 661E 41 STORM MANAGE UNE CHAIN UNK FENCE 1/ 8000 FENCE _u. 5LT FENCE HORIZONTAL DATUM - BASIS OF BEARINGS NAD 83198 THE BEARING OF THE LINE BETWEEN THE WSDOT POINT ID NUMBERS 136 AND 1384 TAKEN AS SOUTH 44'36'58" EAST, BASED UPON NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983(91) VERTICAL DATUM - BASIS OF ELEVATIONS NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 -NAVE 88 PROJECT BENCHMARK KING COUNTY POINT DESIGNATION 3537, TAKEN A5 ELEV. • 29.524 FEET 0 W J co Lu J 0 0 U O 0 0 LEGAL DEPARTMENT 999 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WA II I II II io .5 5 6 s o O co LL.. x 51 :""7L:Nzwa>.Z. 102N N N 1) E Z Imo/ 1� - 19-4 e: Jul 02, 2013 — File: P:\15000s\15045\survey\15045T002dwg