HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIS 2022-03-07 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
Transportation and
Infrastructure Services
Committee
.•.
•:•
Kate Kruller, Chair
Mohamed Abdi
❖ Tosh Sharp
AGENDA
Distribution:
K. Kruller
M. Abdi
C. Hougardy
T. Sharp
H. Ponnekanti
S. Kim (email)
G. Lerner (email)
City Attorney (email)
Clerk File Copy
Place pkt pdf on SharePoint:
Z Trans & Infra Agendas
email cover to: F. Ayala,
A. Le, C. O'Flaherty, A.
Youn, B. Saxton, S. Norris,
L. Humphrey
MONDAY, MARCH 7, 2022 — 5:30 PM
HYBRID MEETING — ONSITE AND VIRTUAL
DUWAMISH CONFERENCE ROOM, 6300 BUILDING, 2ND FLR
MS Teams: Click here to join the meeting
Virtual Meeting - Members of the public may listen by dialing 1-253-292-9750 and entering conference ID 799017451#
Next Scheduled Meeting: March 21, 2022
S. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance.
Item
Recommended Action
Page
1.
PRESENTATIONS
2.
BUSINESS AGENDA
a) Macadam Rd S Water Upgrade & Sidewalk
a)
Forward to 3/21/22 Regular Consent
Pg. 1
Improvements Project, Amendment #3 — (A. Altallal)
Agenda
b) 42nd Ave South Bridge Replacement Project
b)
Committee approval
Pg. 7
RAISE Grant Application — (B. Robinson)
c) Solid Waste Contract Status Update — (G. Lerner)
c)
Discussion only
Pg. 11
3.
MISCELLANEOUS
Allentown Community Update — (Hari Ponnekanti)
Discussion only
Pg. 21
Future Agenda:
Next Scheduled Meeting: March 21, 2022
S. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance.
City of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
Public Works Department - Hari Ponnekanti, Director/City Engineer
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer
BY: Adib Altallal, Utilities Engineer
CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg
DATE: March 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Macadam Rd S. Water Upgrade Project- Design and Construction Mqmt
Project No. 90440105
Contract No. 21-022, Amendment No. 3
ISSUE
Approve Amendment No. 3 for Contract No. 21-022 with PACE Engineers Inc. (PACE) for the Macadam Rd S. Water
Upgrade. Amendment No. 3 includes a fulltime inspector for the duration of the project.
BACKGROUND
In 2015, the City contracted with PACE as the design consultant for the Macadam Rd S. Water Upgrade Project, along with
the Andover Park E Water & Sewer Improvements under Contract No. 15-116. In 2017, the design was put on hold due to
construction cost estimates coming in higher than proposed in the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Program. Due to limited
fire flow issues, the project design contract was renewed and the project budget allocated was increased. This project
addresses the need for additional capacity and the decision was made to change to a 12 -inch pipe after two fires had erupted
during Summer 2021 along the Macadam Road S waterline. The 12 -inch pipe size wit create plenty of redundant capacity and
fire storage to minimize liability.
In February 2021, Council approved a new project design contract with PACE Engineers. Previous amendments increased
design costs, added construction management costs, and included public outreach.
DISCUSSION
The project has been repeatedly prioritized as a critical Capital Improvement Program project by the Water Department. Due
to staff shortage, construction management will need to be contracted out instead of completed in-house. Amendment No. 3
includes a fulltime inspector for the duration of the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The contract amendment is for $150,062.40, which will bring the contract total to $292,001.56 for the design and construction
management services portion of the Macadam Rd S Water Upgrade. The project costs are within budget and are 100%
funded by the water enterprise fund.
PACE Contract 2021-2023 Design/CM Budget
Original Contract $77,339.16 $800,000.00
Amendment No. 1 27,600.00
Amendment No. 2 37,000.00
Amendment No. 3 150,062.40
Total $292,001.56
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve a supplemental agreement for design and construction management services with PACE in
the amount of $150,062.40 for the Macadam Rd S Water Upgrade Project and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at
the March 21, 2022 Regular Council Meeting.
Attachments: 2021 CIP, Page 61
PACE Supplemental Agreement No. 3
1
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2021 to 2026
PROJECT: Macadam Rd S Water Upgrade Project No. 90440105
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct 4,300 LF of 10" waterline in Macadam Rd S from S 144th St to Southcenter Blvd.
JUSTIFICATION: Improve fire flow water quality to the north side of Tukwila Hill.
STATUS: Project now scheduled for 2021/2022.
MAINT. IMPACT: The new waterline will eliminate maintenance time for flushing the dead end line while increasing service
reliability.
COMMENT: Pedestrian/Bicycle Program grant for sidewalks unsuccessful in 2018, with water funds used as a match.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2019 2020 2021
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Project Location
=`IN121kitr-
1Itostho
,10
MAikI,
`
W /4'N.
Design
68
100
50
50
V Ill
268
Land (R/W)
1 •''
4
.' 4
.
5 748
0
Const. Mgmt.
t
m
'
250
50
300
Inirilli
600
Construction
300
300
950
'MMffigigyi
'3156 St ��
1,550
TOTAL EXPENSES
68
0
650
400
1,300
0
0
0
0
2,418
FUND SOURCES
st . 1,1111Nagi"
.16o
Awarded Grant
0
Proposed Grant
0
Mitigation Actual
0
Mitigation Expected
0
Utility Revenue
68
0
650
400
1,300
0
0
0
0
2,418
TOTAL SOURCES
68
0
650
400
1,300
0
0
0
0
2,418
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program
61
2
Project Location
=`IN121kitr-
1Itostho
,10
MAikI,
`
W /4'N.
110
k
V Ill
Mil
111
1 •''
4
.' 4
.
5 748
m S 144
6t,
5
St
t
m
'
,
k.v
Inirilli
150 S[
'
'MMffigigyi
'3156 St ��
i 6t ery
::
�
S158St
�i �` `♦ af��ii�\����i
`�\
��GI51
st . 1,1111Nagi"
.16o
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program
61
2
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
Agreement Number: 21-022 (c)
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
Amendment #3
Between the City of Tukwila and PACE Engineers
That portion of Contract No. 21-022 between the City of Tukwila and PACE Engineers is
hereby amended as follows:
Section 04a:
4a. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on
Exhibit "B" attached hereto, will increase the contract amount by $150,000.00, provided that
the total amount of payment to the Consultant not exceed $291,939.16 without express
written modification of the Agreement signed by the City.
All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect.
Dated this
day of , 2022.
CITY OF TUKWILA PACE ENGINEERS
Allan Ekberg, Mayor Printed Name: xe.tsiA1C T M b /VicS 4J
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED APPROVED AS TO FORM
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Office of the City Attorney
CA Reviewed May 2020
Page 1 of 1
3
(ACE
M Engineering Services Company
January 25, 2022
Mr. Adib Altallal
Public Works
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Engineers 1 Planners 1 Surveyors
Subject: Macadam Road and Sidewalk Improvements- Professional Services Contract
Amendment for Construction Inspection
Dear Adib:
Based on our prior discussions, PACE Engineers Inc. (PACE) is submitting the following contract
amendment for City review and approval, to provide full time construction inspection for the Macadam
Road Watermain and Sidewalk Improvement Project. This amendment covers costs necessary to provide
full time inspection services including necessary support staff as described below.
Construction Inspection
PACE will provide a full-time inspector for this project as requested by the City. Duties include but are
not limited to:
• Onsite Inspection
• Coordination with Contractor
• Coordination with City
• Tracking of Quantities
• Pay Requests
• Project Closeout
• Other Tasks as needed.
Previously approved scope and budget included responding to RFI's, review of Material Submittals and
attendance at the preconstruction meeting. This contract does not include any required special
inspections such as compaction testing which will be provided by the City under a separate contract.
PACE proposes to provide the services listed above on a time -and -expense basis not to exceed
$150,0000. The breakdown for the above fee is shown on the attached budget worksheet. This amount
shall not to be exceeded without prior authorization from the City.
Again, we are pleased to submit this updated scope of work and budget to support the Macadam Road
Watermain and Sidewalk Improvement project through construction bidding. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 425.827.2014 or kenn@paceengrs.com if you have any comments or questions.
Sincerely,
PACE Engineers, Inc.
Kenneth H. Nilsen, P.E.
Executive Vice President
PACE Engineers, Inc.
11255 Kirkland Way 1 Suite 300
Kirkland, Washington 98033-6715
p 425.827.2014 1 f 425.827.5043
4
www.paceengrs.com
PACE Engineers
Project Name
Project #:
Staff Type # (See Labor Rates Table)
Staff Type Hourly Rate
Drawing/Task Title
Task 1- Inspection Support
Full time inspection assume 90 days (10 hr days)
Project Initiation
Project Closeout
Coordination
Hours Total
Labor Total
Labor
Code
Job
Title
Project Budget Worksheet - 2022 Washington EOR Rates
Macadam Road Inspection Support
Location:
Tukwila
Prepared By:
Date:
KN
Billing Group #:
Task #:
1/24/2022
Labor Hours by Classification
1 15 81 91
$2,942.40
Total
1
$2,942.40
$250
$165
$150
$115
Sr. Principal
Engineer
Sr. Engineer
Sr. Inspector
Project Administrator
Hour
Total
Dollar Total
900
900.0
$135,000
8
8.0
$1,200
8
8.0
$1,200
12 24 24
60.0
$9,720
12.0 24.0 916.0 24.0
$3,000 $3,960 $137,400 $2,760
976.0
$147,120.00
Expenses
Reimbursable
rate/unit
Quantity
Cost
Postage/Courier
Printing Costs
Photo/Video
Mileage/Travel/Per Diem
Miscellaneous
$2,942.40
Total
1
$2,942.40
File: Macadam Exhibit B1, Fee Worksheet
Subconsultants
Utility Locate
Mechanical Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Geotechnical Engineer
1 & C Engineer
Subconsultant Subtotal
Markup
15%
Total'
Page 1 of 1
PACE Billed Labor Total
Reimbursable Expenses
Subconsultants
Total Project Budget
$147,120.00
$2,942.40
$150,062.40
Printed: 21212022, 4:39 PM
5
6
City f Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
Public Works Department - Hari Porrrrekanti, Director/City Engineer
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer
BY: Brittany Robinson, Public Works Grant Analyst
CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg
DATE: March 4, 2022
SUBJECT: 42nd Ave South Bridge Replacement Project
Project No. 91810404
RAISE Grant Application
ISSUE
Approval to submit an application to the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability & Equity
(RAISE) grant program for the 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement Project in the amount of $8,429,000.
BACKGROUND
The 42nd Ave S Bridge is a critical link to the Allentown neighborhood and is the primary access route
in and out of the BNSF intermodal yard. The replacement of this structure is a high priority for the
City; however, grant funding is needed to complete this project. The City applied for state funding to
replace the bridge in 2017 and 2019 through federally supported grants programs, but was
unsuccessful in these requests. In 2020, the City approved $1.078 million in funding to begin the 30%
design for the 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement. The City has an additional $2.942 million in Solid
Waste Utility Tax budgeted for this project.
In 2021, the City received $1.5 million in federal funding from the Puget Sound Regional Council
(PSRC) to complete the design phase and $12 million from the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) Local Bridge Program, which can support all phases of the 42nd Ave S
Bridge replacement.
The 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement Project is estimated to be approximately $4-9 million short of
being fully funded, depending on which bridge replacement option is selected. The City continues to
apply for local, state, and federal funding opportunities to fill this funding gap.
DISCUSSION
On February 1, 2022, the United State Department of Transportation (USDOT) opened their call for
project for RAISE grant funding. The RAISE program is a federal funding source that supports road,
rail, transit, and port infrastructure projects that have local and regional impacts. The deadline to apply
for funding is April 14, 2022.
Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcentor Boulovard • Tukwila, WA 98158 • 206.43.3-1800 • Whhsite_ TukwilaWA.giw
7
Info Memo, Page 2
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City is requesting $8,429,000 from the RASIE grant to fund the remaining anticipated expenses of
the 42nd Ave S Bridge project. This grant requires a 20% local City match of $2,107,250. The match
would be covered by the Solid Waste Utility Tax budgeted for this project.
Fund Source
Revenue
RAISE Grant
$ 8,429,000
City Revenue
1,087,000
Solid Waste Tax
2,942,000
PSRC Grant
1,500,000
WSDOT Grant
12,000,000
Project Total*
$ 25,958,000
Project Phase
Cost Estimate
Design
$3,700,000
Right of Way
200,000
Construction Mgmt.
3,058,000
Construction
19,000,000
Project Total*
$ 25,958,000
*Total project costs are based on the most expensive bridge replacement option. This is reflected on
the revised CIP page.
RECOMMENDATION
The Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee is being asked to approve a grant submittal
for the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability & Equity (RAISE) grant application for the
42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement Project.
ATTACHMENT: 2021 CIP Page 9 (Revised)
2021 CIP Page 9
Phone; 106-433-1800 • Email: Mayor TukwilaWA.gcv • Website: TukwilMMMA.gov
8
REVISED
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2021 to 2026
PROJECT: 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement Project No. 91810404
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct a replacement structure for the existing 42nd Ave S Bridge near the Tukwila Community
Center. Council approved 30% design with City funding of $1 M in 2020, remaining scheduled in 2022.
JUSTIFICATION: The current bridge has a sufficiency rating of 7.6 (out of 100), is load restricted for AASHTO Type 3 trucks
and is structurally deficient. Truck speed was reduced to 15 mph in 2018.
In 2017 and 2019, Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAC) funding was submitted, but not awarded.
STATUS: Staff will apply for future BRAC funding during the next call. Applying for STP funding in 2020 for $1.5m for
design.
MAINT. IMPACT: New bridge.
STP funding has 13.5% match requirement. BRAC funding would be at 80% match for up to $12 million. Project
COMMENT: partners may include FMSIB & BNSF Railroad as they have over 1,800 trips a day on the 42nd Ave S Bridge
and it is the only ingress/egress available for their intermodal yard. Also State TIB for $3M.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2019 2020 2021
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Project Location
't,... ` yN
b
Design
19
200
878
248
2,355
3,700
Land (R/W)
WA
1
200
+� hm
200
Const. Mgmt.
It
■
Rw-
N
288
1,380
1,390
v
3,058
Construction
9,500
9,500
S,z_ St.
19,000
TOTAL EXPENSES
19
200
878
248
2,843
10,880
10,890
0
0
25,958
FUND SOURCES
Awarded PSRC Grant
248
1,252
1,500
Awarded WSDOT Grant
302
5,698
6,000
12,000
Proposed Grants
I
5,000
3,429
8,429
Solid Waste Utility Tax
650
700
700
710
720
549
4,029
City Oper. Revenue
19
200
228
(700)
589
(528)
741
(549)
0
0
TOTAL SOURCES
19
200
878
0
1,289
10,880
10,890
0
0
25,958
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program
9
9
Project Location
't,... ` yN
b
T
jIL
y
1 4
WA
1
+� hm
It
■
Rw-
N
P
v
r
S,z_ St.
IN 30 StlatilhiNZ °O,
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program
9
9
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2021 to 2026
PROJECT: 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement Project No. 91810404
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct a replacement structure for the existing 42nd Ave S Bridge near the Tukwila Community
Center. Council approved 30% design with City funding of $1M in 2020, remaining scheduled in 2022.
JUSTIFICATION: The current bridge has a sufficiency rating of 7.6 (out of 100), is load restricted for AASHTO Type 3 trucks
and is structurally deficient. Truck speed was reduced to 15 mph in 2018.
In 2017 and 2019, Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAC) funding was submitted, but not awarded
STATUS: Staff will apply for future BRAC funding during the next call. Applying for STP funding in 2020 for $1.5m for
design.
MAINT. IMPACT: New bridge.
STP funding has 13.5% match requirement. BRAC funding would be at 80% match for up to $12 million. Project
COMMENT: partners may include FMSIB & BNSF Railroad as they have over 1,800 trips a day on the 42nd Ave S Bridge
and it is the only ingress/egress available for their intermodal yard. Also State TIB for $3M.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2019 2020 2021
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Project Location
\
j
7 St
a
Design
19
200
878
i I
4:
1,252
4*
41,1,
2,349
Land (R/W)
r
Iiii.
30
t
.1-
.
.
n, .
0
'9 -
30
Const. Mgmt.
Ski
N ',,r,....,,
—t. y
a
250
1,650
1,650
3,550
Construction
7,800
7,800
15,600
TOTAL EXPENSES
19
200
878
0
1,532
9,450
9,450
0
0
21,529
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
0
Proposed BRAC Grant
6,000
6,000
12,000
Proposed STP Gran
1,000
1,000
2,000
Proposed TIB
1,500
1,500
3,000
Proposed FMSIB
500
500
Solid Waste Utility Tax
650
700
700
710
720
549
4,029
City Oper. Revenue
19
200
228
(700)
832
240
(270)
(549)
0
0
TOTAL SOURCES
19
200
878
0
1,532
9,450
9,450
0
0
21,529
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program
9
10
Project Location
\
j
7 St
a
i I
4:
_, w
4*
41,1,
....‹
r
Iiii.
,___si,
, _____—
'., t
t
.1-
.
.
n, .
0
'9 -
Ski
N ',,r,....,,
—t. y
a
;,.S 30 St --- ....1 I i�.
2021 - 2026 Capital Improvement Program
9
10
City of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
Public Works Department - Hari Ponnekanti, Director/City Engineer
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee
FROM: Hari Ponnekanti, Public Works Director/City Engineer
By: Griffin Lerner, Public Works Budget Analyst
CC: Mayor Allan Ekberg
DATE: March 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Contract Status Update
Contract No. 12-027
ISSUE
The City's contract with Waste Management (WM) expires on October 31, 2023. The City is now undergoing a request
for proposals (RFP) process to ensure a smooth transition.
DISCUSSION:
Since the last update on January 18th, staff have incorporated industry review comments and resident feedback, and released
the RFP, with final proposals due April 18. Based on resident feedback from the survey, staff included the following (and more)
in the RFP:
• enhanced language around operational reliability
• a cost estimate for weekly recycling
• performance measures for customer service
PROCESS SCHEDULE (All times Pacific Time)
Event
Staff/Legal Review of Industry Review RFP and Contract
Release Industry Review draft of document set
Release Resident Survey
Industry Review comments due
Resident Survey due
Time Frame
November 2021
December 10, 2021
December 27, 2021
January 4, 2022
January 14, 2022
Release Final RFP to Known Interested Parties
First Round Proposer Questions Due
Second Round Proposer Questions Due
Proposals Due
February 7, 2022
March 7, 2022 3:00 PM PST
March 28, 2022 3:00 PM PDT
April 18, 2022 5:00 PM PDT
Proposal Evaluation, Interviews, Clarifications, Selection
Finalization of Contract
Recommendation to City Council, Council Process
City Executes Contract
Contractor Delivers Transition/Implementation Plan
Container Delivery
Start of Collection Services
April/May, 2022
May/June, 2022
June, 2022
July, 2022
September, 2022
October, 2023
November 1, 2023
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact since the selected vendor will reimburse the procurement costs at the end of this process.
While there will be no financial impact to the city, staff expects that future rates (monthly user fees) will increase
substantially.
RECOMMEDATION
Discussion only.
Attachment: Solid Waste Survey Analysis
11
SOLID WASTE RFP SURVEY
ANALYSIS
ri in erner, Public Works Analyst
12
1
OVERVIEW
s a part of the RFP process, city staff created and administered an online
urvey to assess resident priorities in the next solid waste contract.
Open for three weeks, from December 27 — January 14
eceived 112 responses from nearly every neighborhood in Tukwila
l
Survey measured priorities for next contract; it is not a reflection of current
service
13
RELIABILITY IS A KEY PRIORITY FOR
RESIDENTS
Weighted Importance of Priorities in Solid Waste
Provider
Reliability Customer Service
14
RESIDENTS PREFER THE STATUS QUO IN
GARBAGE COLLECTION
How Frequently Would You Like Garbage to be
Collected?
91%
5%
4%
Every week - keep it the same
Every other week Other (specify)
RESIDENTS EXPRESSED INTEREST IN
MORE FREQUENT RECYCLING
How Frequently Would You Like Recycling to be
Collected?
46%
Every other week - keep it the
same
50%
5%
Every week Other (specify)
[RESIDENTS FEEL COMPOSTING SHOULD
REMAIN AN OPT -IN SERVICE
How Should Composting Incorporated into the
Solid Waste Contract?
32%
It should be mandatory, and
everyone should receive a
composting bill even if that
means a higher cost
59%
It should be an opt -in service
10%
People should address their
own compost outside of the
solid waste provider
17
OTHER INSIGHTS
Need for bulky
item pick-up/drop
off
nterest in options
for difficult to
recycle items
18
RESIDENT PRIORITIES WILL BE REFLECTED
IN THE NEXT CONTRACT
WhatWe Hear
Lwtiu1
Reliability is important
i
Interest in more
frequent recycling
Customer servic
should be responsive t
needs
[1>
IP Incorporated enhanced
language around monitoring
operational performance
Requested a cost
estimate for weekly
recycling
Added performance
measures for customer
service
19
20
21
Allentown Questions & Answers
Working Document
Date of
Question
Question/Comment
Answer to Question/Comment
Action/Action Date
1.
1/18
TISC
Meeting
Provide information on traffic
enforcement in Allentown,
including emphasis patrols,
warnings, tickets, and
congestion mitigation.
Police Chief Dreyer provided a written response
that was shared with the City Council and
community.
Emailed to Council 1/21
and to residents 2/10
2.
1/18
TISC
Meeting
Provide BNSF vendor
brochure regarding emergency
routes.
Emailed to Council
Emailed to Council 1/21
3.
1/18
TISC
Meeting
Engage with community prior
to painting barriers at S. 124th
intersection.
This discussion is planned for a future Allentown
Community meeting.
4.
1/18
TISC
Meeting
Make December bridge
closure traffic (crash/speed)
data available to the public.
There were four reported vehicle accidents
between 12/15 — 1/18, although the relationship
to the bridge closure is unknown. No speeding
tickets were issued during that period.
5.
1/18
TISC
Meeting
Provide history of the
placement of the jersey
barriers in the Foster Point
neighborhood.
Information about this was located in City Council
minutes from 1998 and emailed to Council.
Emailed to Council 1/21
6.
1/24
Committee
of the
Whole
Are laws in place regarding
hazmat materials driven
through a residential area?
Hazmat materials can be transported through
residential areas. Please see the
https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/regulations/hazardous-
materials/how-comply-federal-hazardous-
materials-regulations.
7.
1/24
Committee
of the
Whole
How can the City effectively
regulate restrictions on bridge?
Enforcement is through the local police
department.
21
8.
1/24
Committee
of the
Whole
Can short term traffic calming
solutions be put into place?
(Signs, speed cushions, etc).
Include partners when
possible.
Public Works is in the process of doing an
evaluation of traffic on all Allentown streets to
determine what types of traffic calming measures
will be most effective. This item will be brought to
the 3/21 Transportation & Infrastructure Services
Committee meeting.
9.
1/24
Committee
of the
Whole
I How much has the city spent
on past EIS studies?
No EIS studies have been completed regarding
the truck reroute in the past.
10.
1/24
Committee
of the
Whole
Are we actively engaged with
partners/stakeholder? How
can we go further to partner
toward solutions?
The City is actively engaging with residents, local
businesses (including BNSF), state
representatives, and other stakeholders regarding
the truck traffic through Allentown. Our goal is to
find a solution that will be beneficial for all parties.
11.
2/7 Regular
Meeting
Provide update on outcomes of
recent increased truck traffic
enforcement in Allentown
Chief Dreyer will be present at 3/7 TIS meeting to
address this question.
12.
2/7 Regular
Meeting
Provide update on outcomes of
recent meeting with Sheriff's
Office, WSDOT, etc.
Chief Dreyer will be present at 3/7 TIS meeting to
address this question.
13.
2/14
Committee
of the
Whole
TS&L 42nd Ave S Bridge
Replacement Options- Develop
a chart with cost, timeframe to
build, lifespan, which design is
easiest to maintain, which
design is most function for traffic
patterns, and a mock-up
illustrating what each option will
look like.
Staff is working on this and will bring a response to
the TISC meeting on 3/7.
14.
2/14
Committee
of the
Whole
Does the city need to purchase
property for the 124th option?
Staff is working on this and will bring more a
response to the TISC meeting on 3/7.
22
15.
2/14
Committee
of the
Whole
Gather feedback from large
group of residents on bridge
replacement options.
Staff is working on this and will bring more
information to the TISC meeting on 3/7. At the
2/22/22 Allentown community meeting residents
were very vocal in support of the 42nd Ave.
alignment and strongly against the 124th Ave.
alignment.
16.
2/14
Committee
of the
Whole
Would a new bridge on 124th
have good traffic flow? Is there
a good way to slow trucks on
124th?
Staff is working on this and will bring a response to
the TISC meeting on 3/7.
17.
2/14
Committee
of the
Whole
What are the social impacts of
the new bridge on either 42nd
Ave S or 124th Street on the
community?
Staff is working on this and will bring a response to
the TISC meeting on 3/7.
18.
2/14
Committee
of the
Whole
Can the city legally do anything
to limit truck traffic on the new
bridge? Is there a way to create
an ordinance to reroute trucks
outside of Allentown?
Staff is working on this and will bring a response to
the TISC meeting on 3/7.
23