Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCD 2022-04-18 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Planning and Community Development Committee O Cynthia Delostrinos Johnson, Chair O Kathy Hougardy De'Sean Quinn AGENDA MONDAY, APRIL 18, 2022 — 5:30 PM Distribution: C. Delostrinos Johnson K. Hougardy D. Quinn T. McLeod Mayor Ekberg D. Cline R. Bianchi C. O'Flaherty A. Youn L. Humphrey THIS MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED BOTH ON-SITE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL AND ALSO VIRTUALLY, BASED ON THE GOVERNOR'S PROCLAMATION 20-28. ON-SITE PRESENCE WILL BE IN THE HAZELNUT CONFERENCE ROOM (6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD) THE PHONE NUMBER FOR THE PUBLIC TO LISTEN TO THIS MEETING IS: 1-253-292-9750, Access Code 768282783# Click here to: Join Microsoft Teams Meeting For Technical Support during the meeting call: 1-206-433-7155. Item Recommended Action Page 1. BUSINESS AGENDA a. Multi -Family Property Tax Exemption Program, Tukwila International Boulevard. a. Forward to 4/25 C.O.W. Meeting. Pg.1 Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager b. A Port of Seattle grant application for economic b. Committee consideration/ Pg.9 development in the amount of $42,000 (local match of $10,500). decision. Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager c. An update on the Tourism Promotion Area. c. Discussion only. Pg.17 Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager 2. MISCELLANEOUS Next Scheduled Meeting: May 2, 2022 S. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 206-433-1800 (TukwilaCityClerk@TukwilaWA.gov) for assistance. TO: City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Planning and Community Development Committee FROM: Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: April 7, 2022 SUBJECT: Multi -Family Property Tax Exemption Program Tukwila International Blvd ISSUE Creation of a limited Multi -Family Tax Exemption program for owner occupied affordable housing along Tukwila International Blvd. BACKGROUND Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 84.14 allows municipalities planning under the Growth Management Act to provide a property tax exemption to qualifying residential developments within their cities. The Multi -Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) reduces the property taxes owed on a development by exempting the value of the multi -family residential improvements' over a specific period. In theory, an MFTE program stimulates the creation or rehabilitation of multi- family housing. The housing can be rental or owner -occupied and market -rate or affordable. Overview of State Law Requirements As outlined in RCW 84.14.007, the purpose of the MFTE is: ...[T]he purpose of this chapter to encourage increased residential opportunities, including affordable housing opportunities, in cities that are required to plan or choose to plan under the growth management act within urban centers where the governing authority of the affected city has found there is insufficient housing opportunities, including affordable housing opportunities. It is further the purpose of this chapter to stimulate the construction of new multifamily housing and the rehabilitation of existing vacant and underutilized buildings for multifamily housing in urban centers having insufficient housing opportunities that will increase and improve residential opportunities, including affordable housing opportunities, within these urban centers. RCW 84.14 allows municipalities to create MFTE programs for up to 8, 12 and/or 20 years, subject to certain requirements. • Market Rate: A municipality can create an MFTE program that allows for a project to have a property tax exemption for up to eight years if the project does not include affordability requirements. The project could be rental or owner -occupied. • 12 -Year Affordability: A municipality can create an MFTE program that allows for a project to have a property tax exemption for up to 12 years if it meets certain affordability requirements. To be eligible for the 12 -year exemption, a project must commit that at The land is still subject to being assessed property taxes as is space used for commercial activities. 1 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 least 20 percent of the units in the project be affordable to low- and moderate -income households (if rental) or moderate -income households (if owner -occupied). RCW 81.14.010 (1) defines `affordable housing' as, "...residential housing that is rented by a person or household whose monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed thirty percent of the household's monthly income. For the purposes of housing intended for owner occupancy, `affordable housing; means residential housing that is within the means of low or moderate -income households. `Low-income household' is defined as, "...a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is at or below eighty percent of the median family income adjusted for family size, for the county, city, or metropolitan statistical area, where the project is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development (RCW 84.14.010 (8))." Moderate -income household is defined as, "...a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than eighty percent but is at or below one hundred fifteen percent of the median family income adjusted for family size, for the county, city, or metropolitan statistical area, where the project is located, as reported by the United States department of housing and urban development (RCW 84.14.010 (9)). • 20 -Year Affordability: A municipality can create an MFTE program that allows for a project to have a property tax exemption for up to 20 years if it meets certain requirements. To be eligible for the 20 -year exemption, a project must commit that at least 25% of the units will be made available for affordable homeownership, with a local government or non-profit overseeing long term compliance with affordability restrictions. The zoning where the units are constructed must allow a minimum density of at least 25 units per acre. The affordability requirements are the same as for the 12 -year exemption (see above). Around 50 cities and one county in the State have in place or have had in place a MFTE program. Most of these cities are located along the 1-5 corridor between Olympia and Marysville. Many cities provide additional requirements on their MFTE programs, which may vary by city. Some cities required greater affordability than the State's minimum. Some cities have other types of requirements. For example, the City of Woodinville requires that a building be built to LEED standards in order to get the MFTE; the City of Newcastle requires a public or cultural use for the building; and the City of Yakima requires that there be an investment of least $25,000 in each unit constructed. Several cities, such as Seattle, require that all MFTE projects have an affordability component and do not offer the 8 -year exemption option for market rate units. Tukwila's MFTE Program In 2014 the City adopted an MFTE program for a portion of the Southcenter District. It is the portion of the Transit Oriented Development District in the Tukwila Urban Center (Southcenter District) that is west of the Green River (see attached map). At the time, the City's goal of adopting an MFTE program for the Southcenter District was to encourage the development of new multi -family housing to help fulfill the City's vision for the neighborhood and meet the City's regional growth targets for new housing units. Because of the lack of new housing development in that District for many years, staff recommended the incentive as a temporary way to show the private sector that the market rents for new housing was significantly higher than the comparable rents in the adjacent neighborhoods which reflected older housing stock. The incentive also made multi -family housing financially feasible 2 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 for the developer, especially given the market demand for other types of land uses, specifically one-story retail. The City's MFTE program provided for both an 8- and 12 -year exemption period2. In order to be eligible for the MFTE, a project was required to meet additional City criteria, which included: 1. The units must be in the residential targeted areas (see attached map) 2. The units must be within a residential or mixed-use structure containing at least four dwelling units. 3. The units must have an average size of at least 500 square feet per unit. 4. A minimum of 15 percent of the units must be at least 900 square feet in area and contain at least two bedrooms. 5. The units must be designed and used for permanent residential occupancy. 6. Each unit must have its own private bathroom and private kitchen. Projects that utilize common kitchens and/or common bathrooms are not eligible. Because the City's goal was to provide a temporary incentive to stimulate the private development without becoming a long-term subsidy, the City's Southcenter District MFTE program included a limited application period which sunset at the end of 2017. After that the City no longer accepted MFTE applications. The following projects utilized the MFTE program within the Southcenter District. 1. AirMark Apartments (2018 MFTE Effective Date, 8 -Year Exemption). AirMark Apartments is a mixed use, 19 story building located along Andover Park East. The project features 371 market rate apartments and the Hotel Interurban. Only the residential portion of the project is eligible for the MFTE. The land (entire parcel) and hotel portion of the building is still subject to property taxes. 2. Marvelle Southcenter (2021 MFTE Effective Date, 8 -Year Exemption) Marvelle Southcenter is active senior housing at the corner of Baker Blvd and Andover Park East. 3. Holden at Southcenter (2022 MFTE Effective Date, 8 -Year Exemption) Holden at Southcenter includes five floors of assisted living units and one floor of memory care units. Only the assisted living units qualified for the MFTE. Note: All projects submitted their MFTE applications to the City prior to the end of 2017 and were completed within the required period. The City Council reenacted the program at the end of 2021 and projects can now submit their request for the MFTE in the Southcenter District through 2022. 2021 Housing Discussion and the MFTE The Housing Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan mentions multi -family property tax exemptions as a potential strategy to achieve Tukwila's housing goals. The incentive was also included as a potential strategy in the Transit -Oriented Development Housing Strategies Action 2 The 20 -year exemption was not permitted under State law at the time. 3 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 4 Plan adopted by the Council in September 2021. At the November 22, 2021, Committee of the Whole meeting the City Council was briefed on the MFTE and options for Tukwila. Staff outlined and the City Council supported a four -step process for studying and possibility updated the City's MFTE program. As part of the discussion on the MFTE the Council noted the importance of increasing the housing options for community members. The City Council provided staff with the following direction regarding the MFTE. Step 1, December 2021, Southcenter District (COMPLETED, Ordinance adopted December 6, 2021) Amend the City's current MFTE program to accept applications through 2022. This amendment would retain the current program boundaries and other criteria. The City Council adopted an ordinance on December 7 addressing the Southcenter District MFTE. The Southcenter MFTE will expire at the end of 2022. Step 2, First Quarter of 2022, Tukwila International Blvd (Current phase) Amend the City's MFTE program to create a second and new Residential Targeted Area along Tukwila International Blvd (TIB) with eligibility criteria allowing owner occupied, affordable housing. At this step, rental apartments would not be included in the program due to more complex considerations such as affordability limits, boundaries of eligible areas, design criteria, redevelopment criteria, displacement risk, market necessity, and other issues. This provision allows the City to expand owner -occupied, affordable housing opportunities in the City and new development along TIB. As the Council is aware, Forterra is considering moving forward with the Wadajir project at the old Knight's Inn property. Wadajir will consist of 100 units of affordable, owner -occupied housing within the Tukwila International Blvd neighborhood. Forterra has indicated that the MFTE is needed in order to secure financing from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Owner -occupied multi -family housing is very rare in Tukwila. In addition to making the project more financially feasible, the MFTE would enable the developer to make the units more affordable for the households living in the units. The developer has requested the 20 - year exemption. Step 3, 2022, Tukwila South (Later in 2022) Per the discussion at the November 1, 2021, PCD meeting, the committee recommends that staff examine the creation of a MFTE program for the Tukwila South area prior to the comprehensive Citywide examination outlined below. This work would also occur in 2022. Step 4, 2022, Comprehensive (Later in 2022) Conduct a more comprehensive review to consider expansions of the MFTE program. This review would include multi -family rental housing, other geographic areas, housekeeping items, and other considerations and criteria such as: 4. Where would the City like to see more multi -family housing (rental and/or ownership)? 5. Where would the City like to see renovation of multi -family housing? 6. Where would the City like to see preservation of existing affordable housing? 7. What levels of affordability would the City like? 8. What levels of affordability are feasible given the value of the incentive, other financing, and development costs? 4 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 5 9. How would the MFTE prioritize multi -family housing as a land use compared to other land uses in that area. 10. Is the MFTE necessary and/or sufficient as an incentive? 11. What project design standards should be included (e.g. structured parking, public amenities, etc.)? 12. What are the financial implications to the City, Tukwila School District, and other taxing districts? 13. How will the City manage and monitor ongoing affordability requirements and reports? DISCUSSION Staff would like to move forward with step 2 of the MFTE review process and have the City Council consider a limited MFTE program for owner occupied housing along Tukwila International Blvd. Again, as outlined to the City Council in November and December of 2021 staff believes this MFTE program should be limited until the City has completed the more comprehensive review (step 4). The goal with adopting a limited program along Tukwila International Blvd. is to help demonstrate that owner occupied, affordable housing is possible in the neighborhood. The following are general criteria staff is considering for this step in the MFTE. 1. Applications for the MFTE must be submitted prior to December 31, 2024. 2. The project must include a parcel that directly fronts along Tukwila International Blvd. 3. All units must be owner occupied. The units cannot be used for rentals or Airbnb's. 4. Only those units that meet the affordability requirement of RCW 84.14 will qualify for the property tax exemption. All other units will still be subject to the property tax. 5. Include a mix of unit types and sizes. 6. To qualify for the 20 -year exemption, the project must: a. Have a government entity or non-profit that agrees to monitor and manage the affordability requirements over the life of exemption and agree to provide annual reports to the City. b. Have a zoning that allows for a least 15 units per acre. FINANCIAL IMPACT Step 2 outlined above would have minimal financial impacts to the City primarily because they are small relative to the amount of development already in the City. New development does bring additional city costs to provide services but affordable, ownership housing may stimulate other development that would bring additional revenues. RECOMMENDATION Forward to the April 25 Committee of the Whole meeting for a discussion by the full council. Staff is asking that the City Council indicate its general consensus support for creating a limited MFTE, for owner -occupied affordable housing along Tukwila International Blvd as outlined above. Staff will then bring a draft ordinance through PCD for consideration by the full council. ATTACHMENTS • Southcenter District, Multi -Family Property Tax Exemption Residential Targeted Area. 5 6 a) > c c m City of Tukwila Multi -Family Property Tax Exemption Residential Targeted Area Target Parcels ZoningCode TUC-TOD Zone Figure A 7 8 W i City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Community Development FROM: Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: April 12, 2022 SUBJECT: 2022/2023 Port of Seattle Economic Development Grant ISSUE Staff is seeking committee authorization to submit an application to the Port of Seattle for the 2022/2023 Economic Development Grant. BACKGROUND The Port of Seattle has a grant program to provide economic development funds to cities based on the City's total population. In the past the City of Tukwila has received approximately $20,000 per year under the grant program. The Port has transitioned the program from a one- year cycle to a two-year cycle to provide more flexibility to cities. Under the two-year program, Tukwila is eligible to receive $42,000. The grant requires a 50% match, with half the match being cash ($10,500). In the past the Office of Economic Development used the funds for marketing purposes for the City for general economic development, to support childcare facilities during the pandemic, and to help small businesses develop their digital resources. For the 2022/2023 grant cycle Economic Development staff is proposing to use the funds to support the Trusted Community Partners Network, to update the City's one-page economic development collaterals, for economic development data needs, to support Experience Tukwila digital marketing, and the creation of an economic development promotional video the City can use at events with developers and investors to highlight the City. DISCUSSION These funds provide the Office of Economic much needed discretionary funds to complete general economic development activities in the City. Without the Port funds, the City would not be able to complete the tasks outlined above. FINANCIAL IMPACT Existing allocated funds from the economic development budget and/or allocated funds from the lodging tax program will be used for the $10,500 match. RECOMMENDATION Staff is requesting the Committee's permission to apply for the grant. Once the grant is awarded final action is required by the full council to accept the funds. Once we have been awarded the funds staff is requesting permission from the Committee to place the acceptance of the grant on a future consent agenda. ATTACHMENTS • Port of Seattle Economic Development Grant Application (blank). 9 10 Port of Seattle Port of Seattle Century Agenda 2022 Economic Development Partnership Program City Application City: Federal Tax Number: Contact Name: Title: Telephone: Email: Address: City, State, Zip: Alternate Contact: Alternate Telephone: Alternate Email: Declaration: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IN THIS APPLICATION TO THE PORT OF SEATTLE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Signature of Responsible Official: Print or Type Name and Title: Date: Deadline: The program application must be submitted electronically to the Port of Seattle by Friday, March 18, 2022 by 5:00 pm. Submit the application to: e-submittals- purchportseattle.org Page 1 of 6 Program Application - 2022 Port of Seattle Economic Development Partnership Program Modified 2/9/2022 11 Program Overview and Funding The Port of Seattle Economic Development Partnership Program is a cooperative economic development grant program to help support local and regional economic development initiatives across King County. In 2022, the Port will offer participating cities two-year grant awards to funds projects and initiatives that address COVID-19 economic challenges and impacts. Grants are made to King County cities on a per -capita calculation based on Washington State Office of Financial Management annual population estimates. Cities with populations numbering less than 5,000 people are eligible to receive grant funds up to $5,000 and cities with populations numbering more than 60,000 people are eligible to receive grant funding up to $60,000 annually. See appendix for specific yearly grant funding for each city. Grant funds require a 50 percent match of dollars or in-kind resources. In-kind resources can only be used for up to 25 percent of the grant award amount. For example, a grant request for $50,000 in Port funds would require the city to commit $25,000 in matching dollars and/ or in- kind resources. Of that $25,000, up to $12,500 of in-kind resources could be applied toward the match requirement. 2022/2023 Emphasis: COVID-19 Economic Recovery The Port of Seattle is interested in partnering with cities on programs and partnerships that advance COVID-19 economic recovery and resiliency. Cities should use 2022/2023 Port grant funding to help impacted businesses, promote local tourism, encourage local spending (buy local) and related strategies that address pandemic related economic challenges. Who can apply and how may the funds be used? Eligible Applicants City governments in King County except for the City of Seattle. Eligible Projects Port of Seattle funds must be used on projects to benefit small and emerging businesses, create jobs, foster business growth, promote consumer confidence, or support the Port of Seattle business interests. Uses may include: • Small business relief and assistance (including incubator/accelerator projects, technical assistance, and support for impacted businesses) • Industry or key sector business retention and expansion assistance • Projects that boost local tourism and consumer confidence such as buy local campaigns • Workforce development initiatives that address local unemployment or underemployment issues • Other projects that can tangibly address pandemic related economic issues Ineligible Projects • Business recruitment initiatives designed to attract new companies or investment to a region or city • Economic development planning Page 2 of 6 Program Application - 2022 Port of Seattle Economic Development Partnership Program Modified 2/9/2022 12 • Direct cash grants or loans made to businesses or organizations • Capital projects including projects to construct either new facilities or make significant, long-term improvements to existing facilities • Underwriting general or capital expenses associated with an event or program already in progress • Any project that would fall outside of the authorized activities that Ports can fund or engage in The Port of Seattle recommends applicant cities meet with Port of Seattle staff before submitting the Economic Development Partnership Program applications. Project Description and Budget 1. Project Description and Need: Summarize the project(s) you plan to implement and explain how project(s) address COVID-19 economic issues in your city. Include a brief description of the project goal(s) and summary of COVID-19 economic impacts being addressed. 2. Project Scope of Work: Outline project title or components, project start and end dates, project goals, project deliverables, and metrics (measurable outcomes) using the table below. Use the timeline column to differentiate the projects that you are implementing in 2022 versus 2023. View Appendix B for sample metrics, measures of success, and data sources. The table is used in the agreement between the Port of Seattle and each city. If you have more than two project categories, simply copy and paste the table below. Project Category: Project Goal(s) Timeline (Start Actions and end dates): Project metrics Project outcomes/deliverables • • • • • • • • • Page 3 of 6 Program Application - 2022 Port of Seattle Economic Development Partnership Program Modified 2/9/2022 13 Project Category: Project Timeline (Start Actions Project metrics Project Goal(s) and end dates): outcomes/deliverables • • • • • • • • • 3. Connection to Port of Seattle interests: Explain how your project benefits the Port of Seattle and ties to the Port's business interests? *Port business interests tie closely to the health of aviation, maritime/ logistics, manufacturing, and construction/ trades clusters. Tourism is another important industry to the Port of Seattle. 4. Project Budget: Identify each project budget category, total funds (including the monetary value of in-kind resources), Port of Seattle funds and City monetary and in-kind matching funds. Include the total funds from each column in the second to last row. Include the percentage contributions to the Port of Seattle's contribution in the last row. This table is used in the agreement between the Port of Seattle and each city. Project: Project Category (Please select one of the categories provided) Port of Seattle Funds Awarded: City Monetary Matching Funds: City In- kind Matching Funds: Total Funds (Including In -Kind): Project 1 Choose an item. Project 2 Choose an item. Project 3 Choose an item. Total Funds: Percentage contribution to Port Funds*: *City monetary and in-kind matching funds must add up to at least 50% of the Port of Seattle funds awarded. In-kind resources can only be used for up to 25 percent of the grant award amount. See program guidelines for more details. Page 4 of 6 Program Application - 2022 Port of Seattle Economic Development Partnership Program Modified 2/9/2022 14 5. Collaboration with partners: Please identify any community organizations (chamber of commerce, neighborhood associations, Small Business Development Centers, SCORE, Greater Seattle Partners, etc.) you plan to work with to complete all or part of your project(s)? 6. Use of consultants or contractors: If you plan to use consultants or contractors to complete all or part of the project, please identify the firm or type of firm you plan to hire for this project. Page 5 of 6 Program Application - 2022 Port of Seattle Economic Development Partnership Program Modified 2/9/2022 15 Appendix: 2022/2023 Maximum Grant Award Amounts by City* City Grant Award City Grant Award Algona $5,000 Lake Forest Park $13,630 Auburn (part) $60,000 Maple Valley $28,640 Beaux Arts Village $5,000 Medina $5,000 Bellevue $60,000 Mercer Island $25,790 Black Diamond $5,320 Milton (part) $5,000 Bothell (part) $28,930 Newcastle $13,310 Burien $52,430 Normandy Park $6,785 Carnation $5,000 North Bend $7,685 Clyde Hill $5,000 Pacific (part) $7,215 Covington $20,890 Redmond $60,000 Des Moines $33,100 Renton $60,000 Duvall $8,125 Sammamish $60,000 Enumclaw (part) $12,830 SeaTac $32,000 Federal Way $60,000 Shoreline $59,260 Hunts Point $5,000 Skykomish $5,000 Issaquah $40,640 Snoqualmie $14,490 Kenmore $24,050 Tukwila $22,000 Kent $60,000 Woodinville $13,100 Kirkland $60,000 Yarrow Point $5,000 *based on 2021 OFM Population estimate Page 6 of 6 Program Application - 2022 Port of Seattle Economic Development Partnership Program Modified 2/9/2022 16 W i City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Community Development FROM: Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: April 8, 2022 SUBJECT: 2021 Tourism Promotion Area Review ISSUE At the November 23, 2020 City Council meeting the City Council was briefed on a proposal by staff to conduct a review of the Tourism Promotion Area Interlocal Agreement (ILA) in 2021. The City Council expressed support for staff conducting the review since the ILA has been place for over five years. Staff would like to provide an update on the review completed in 2021. BACKGROUND Tourism Promotion Area Interlocal Agreement In 2014 the Cities of Tukwila, Des Moines, and SeaTac executed an ILA to form a Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) to cover the combined boundaries of the three cities. Under Washington State law most municipalities in King County cannot form their own TPAs and must partner with at least one other jurisdiction'. Through the TPA ILA the cities agreed that the City of SeaTac would serve as the legislative authority for the TPA area. In 2014, after receiving a petition from hoteliers, the City of SeaTac formally adopted a resolution setting out a TPA fee in the three -city area. The total fee was $2 per night per eligible hotel stay in a hotel or motel with at least 90 rooms2. The $2 rate was the maximum permitted under the current State law. State law was recently amended to allow the rate to go up to $5 per night, provided 60% of the businesses that would pay the increase petition for the increase, and it is approved by the legislative authority. Per the TPA ILA, 100% of the TPA fee, less a one percent administrative charge by the Department of Revenue, goes to Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority (SSRTA) for tourism promotion efforts in the three -city area under the "Seattle Southside" brand. In 2019, SSRTA received just over $3.96 million from the TPA fee. 1 The City of Federal Way was able to carve an exemption to allow it to form its own TPA without the need to partner with another jurisdiction. 2 The TPA fee is a flat fee, while the lodging tax is a percentage. This allows the TPA to collect higher revenue than the lodging tax when rates are low. For example, a room at a hotel going for $100 a night would only provide $1 in lodging tax funds, while the TPA gets the full $2. 17 18 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 The agreement provides a 20 -year term; however, any member City can withdraw from the TPA ILA by providing one year's notice to the other members. In addition, like any agreement, the signatories to the TPA ILA can mutually agree to amend the agreement at any time. Allowable Use of Tourism Promotion Area Fee Revised Code of Washington 35.101.130 states that the Legislative Authority, "...shall have sole discretion as to how the revenue derived from this charge is to be used to promote tourism promotion that increases the number of tourists to the area." `Tourism Promotion' is defined as, "...activities and expenditures designed to increase tourism and convention businesses, including but not limited to advertising, publicizing, or otherwise distributing information for the purpose of attracting tourists, and operating tourism designation marketing organizations." Unlike lodging tax provisions of State Law, the TPA RCW provides a definition of tourist3. A `tourist' means a person who travels for business or pleasure on a trip: (a) Away from the person's place of residence or business and stays overnight in paid accommodations; (b) To a place at least fifty miles away one way by driving distance from the person's place of residence or business for the day or stays overnight. However, island communities without land access are exempt from the mileage requirement under this subsection (5) (b); or (c) To another country or state outside of the person's place of residence or business. In addition to the RCWs outlined above, the TPA ILA also provides requirements on how the TPA funds must be used, the following outlines those provisions. a. The general promotion of tourism within the Seattle Southside TPA as specified in the businesses plan of the SSRTA; b. The marketing of convention and trade shows that benefit local tourism and the Lodging Businesses in the Seattle Southside TPA; c. The marketing of the Seattle Southside TPA region to the travel industry in order to benefit local tourism and the lodging businesses in the Seattle Southside TPA; d. The marketing of the Seattle Southside TPA region to recruit sporting events in order to promote local tourism and to benefit the Lodging Businesses and tourism industry within the Seattle Southside TPA; and e. Direct administration, operation, formation, and start-up costs associated with Seattle Southside TPA and the ongoing management and maintenance of the Seattle Southside TPA program, including but not limited to staff costs, public notice advertising, legal costs, accounting and auditing (including audits of the Parties and the SSRTA as they relate to this Agreement), as approved by SSRTA Board of Directors, provided no funds will be used for costs not directly related to operation of the Seattle Southside TPA, this Agreement, or the SSRTA. 3 This definition goes into effect on July 1, 2020. https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/mayorsoffice/cc/Council Agenda Items/Mayor's Office/PCD, 2022.04.18/Toursim Promotion Area Review/1.0 Informational Memorandum (Info Memo).docx INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 DISCUSSION Following the City Council briefing in November of 2020, Economic Development staff met with staff from the Cities of Des Moines and SeaTac and in December of 2020 the three cities agreed to conduct a staff level review of the TPA ILA and to consider any changes, if warranted. Because of the City of SeaTac's role as the administrator of the TPA, staff from SeaTac organized meetings between the three cities. SSRTA was no part of the initial meetings between the cities, but SeaTac kept SSRTA informed regarding the work of the TPA review. The three cities identified six areas where the cities desired improved outcomes regarding the TPA: 1. Improved communication, coordination, and oversight between the city staff and the SSRTA when the SSRTA's work plan and budget, and new initiatives are developed. 2. Improved coordination between the cities related to SeaTac's administrative oversight of the SSRTA's work plan and budget. 3. Increased communication and transparency between the SSRTA board and city staff. 4. Determine the best approach to item "d)", related to marketing the region to recruit sporting events. 5. Improved clarity related to the SSRTA's use of TPA, lodging tax, and other revenues for discrete projects. 6. The cities and the SSRTA should develop a shared approach to measuring success in achieving the purpose(s) of the TPA As the cities were conducting their review SSRTA also began the process of hiring a new CEO/President to replace Katherine Kertzman who retired. Mark Everton came on board in the spring of 2021 and began to be engaged in the discussions regarding the TPA review. Staff from the three cities and SSRTA have agreed on some high-level actions that SSRTA and the cities will undertake following the TPA review, specifically: 1 . The SSRTA will actively involve the cities in the development of its 5 -year workplan. 2 SeaTac will take a more active role in ensuring clear communication, and resolving any concerns, between the SSRTA and the three cities. 3 . The three cities will strive for consistency in communicating to their respective City Councils about TPA -related issues. 4 The three cities and the SSRTA will hold regular (e.g. quarterly or semi-annual) coordination meetings. 5 . The SSRTA and three cities will establish joint performance metrics for tourism promotion area revenues, which will based upon applicable law and the SSRTA's work plan. 6 . The SSRTA will consider the adoption of reasonable procedural and policy recommendations by the three cities that are intended to improve communication and transparency. The items listed above are considered best practices that the cities and SSRTA will follow as we move forward. At this point it does not need seem necessary to amend the TPA ILA or enter into any formal agreements. However, Tukwila staff has indicated that should the city have concerns https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/mayorsoffice/cc/Council Agenda Items/Mayor's Office/PCD, 2022.04.18/Toursim Promotion Area Review/1.0 Informational Memorandum (Info Memo).docx 19 20 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 4 in the future regarding these best practices not being followed, the City will ask for a formal agreement to be adopted by the parties. The three cities and SSRTA have already begun to implement the actions outlined above, which have included: 1. Regular meetings between the three cities and SSRTA to discuss high level issues, including the process to updating SSRTA's strategic plan. 2. Being informed of any lobbying efforts SSRTA might be considering doing in order for the cities to express any concerns, if any. 3. Being invited and meeting the new marketing agency SSRTA has hired to market the three city. Staff appreciates the work of the City of SeaTac in learning the 2021 review and the openness of SSRTA staff to improve communication with the three cities. FINANCIAL IMPACT Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS • January 31, 2022, staff memorandum to City Managers/City Administrator in the cities of SeaTac, Des Moines, and Tukwila. • Cover Letter from Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority. • Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority 2022 Workplan. https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/mayorsoffice/cc/Council Agenda Items/Mayor's Office/PCD, 2022.04.18/Toursim Promotion Area Review/1.0 Informational Memorandum (Info Memo).docx To: Carl Cole, SeaTac City Manager David Cline, Tukwila City Administrator Michael Matthias, Des Moines City Manager From: City of SeaTac Evan Maxim, Community & Economic Development Director Aleksandr Yeremeyev, Economic Development Manager Tanja Carter, Economic Development Strategist City of Tukwila Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager City of Des Moines Tim George, City Attorney Ashley Young, Events & Facilities Manager Mark Everton, President of the Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority Date: January 31, 2022 Re: Three -party review of the Seattle Southside Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) Background In May of 2021, the City Managers of SeaTac and Des Moines, and the City Administrator of Tukwila met with the economic development staff for all three cities to review a joint memo dated April 28, 2021 (Attachment 1). The joint memo summarized the findings of the three -city review of the TPA and the Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority (SSRTA). All three cities expressed a strong desire to maintain the TPA, continue collaborative regional marketing to attract tourists to the three cities, and continue to support the SSRTA. The three cities also identified several desired outcomes that would improve upon the current successes of the SSRTA: A. Improved communication, coordination, and oversight between the city staff and the SSRTA when the SSRTA's work plan and budget, and new initiatives are developed; B. Improved coordination between the cities related to SeaTac's administrative oversight of the SSRTA's work plan and budget; C. Increased communication and transparency between the SSRTA board and city staff; D. Determine the best approach to item "d)", related to marketing the region to recruit sporting events; E. Improved clarity related to the SSRTA's use of TPA, lodging tax, and other revenues for discrete projects; and F. The cities and the SSRTA should develop a shared approach to measuring success in achieving the purpose(s) of the TPA. Page 1 of 2 21 At the close of the meeting in May of 2021, staff from the three cities were directed to meet and determine the best approach to achieving the above outcomes. Joint Meetings & Review Representatives from the three cities met seven times between May and September. These meetings allowed for a thorough discussion on possible approaches and allowed all three cities to discuss specific desired outcomes. At the close of these meetings, the three cities agreed to approach the SSRTA president to discuss several possible improvements to the working relationship between the SSRTA and the three cities. In December of 2021, representatives of the three cities met with the SSRTA president (Mark Everton') to discuss eight "discussion items". The meetings between the three cities and the SSRTA were positive and productive. The following recommended approach, while not reflecting all of the items every city desired, will address the desired outcomes identified in May 2021. Recommended Approach In general, city staff and the SSRTA have agreed on the following "high level" items; specific components of these items are described in Attachment 2. 1. The SSRTA will actively involve the cities in the development of its 5 -year workplan; SeaTac will take a more active role in ensuring clear communication, and resolving any concerns, between the SSRTA and the three cities. 2. The three cities will strive for consistency in communicating to their respective City Councils about TPA -related issues. 3. The three cities and the SSRTA will hold regular (e.g. quarterly or semi-annual) coordination meetings. 4. The SSRTA and three cities will establish joint performance metrics for tourism promotion area revenues, which will based upon applicable law and the SSRTA's work plan. 5. The SSRTA will consider the adoption of reasonable procedural and policy recommendations by the three cities that are intended to improve communication and transparency. Next Steps The city and SSRTA staff generally agreed that the above approach should address many of the concerns that prompted this review. The organizations have also agreed that an adaptive approach may be required. As noted in the April 2021 memo, a permanent (durable) agreement is valuable; at present, staff recommends that this memo with attachments serve as the agreement. In June of 2021 the former SSRTA president, Katherine Kurtzman, retired. Mark Everton was hired as the new president of the SSRTA by its board. Page 2 of 2 22 Attachment 2 — April 28, 2021 Memo To: Carl Cole, SeaTac City Manager David Cline, Tukwila City Administrator Michael Matthias, Des Moines City Manager From: City of SeaTac Evan Maxim, Community & Economic Development Director Aleksandr Yeremeyev, Economic Development Manager Tanja Carter, Economic Development Strategist City of Tukwila Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator Brandon Miles, Business Relations Manager City of Des Moines Tim George, Ashley Young, Events & Facilities Manager Date: April 28, 2021 Re: Three -party review of the Seattle Southside Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) Background In November of 2020, the City of Tukwila initiated contact with the cities of Des Moines and SeaTac, expressing a desire to review and consider improvements to the administration of the TPA. In particular, the three cities sought to ensure that the TPA, and by extension the Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority (SSRTA), is accomplishing the purpose of the TPA as articulated in the Interlocal Agreement. Further, the Interlocal Agreement that enabled the TPA has now been in effect for over six years and the City of Tukwila felt it was an appropriate time for an evaluation. In mid-December of 2020, the three cities agreed to engage in a staff level review of the TPA program to determine what, if any, adjustments to the administration of the TPA are warranted, and the appropriate mechanism to make any necessary adjustments. Generally, staff understood that a shared understanding of the issues, the legal landscape, and options on how to proceed would result from the staff level review. Representatives from the three cities met on January 8, January 22, February 12, February 26, and March 12 initially to identify a scope of review and then several options on how to proceed. The SSRTA was not asked to participate directly in the review, though SeaTac staff did inform the SSRTA president that the review was occurring. Page 1 of 5 23 Scope of Review and Approach The Interlocal Agreement (ILA) establishes the intended use of TPA funds. The TPA funds may be used for five categories of work: a) promoting tourism, b) marketing convention and trade shows, c) marketing the TPA region to the travel industry, d) marketing the TPA region to recruit sporting events, and e) the operations and administration of the SSRTA. The three cities have concluded that items "a)", "d)", and "e)" warranted additional review (see attached). Once the scope of review was established, the staff identified the desired outcomes that would address the concerns, and possible mechanisms to achieve the desired outcomes. Desired Outcomes Staff from all three cities expressed a strong desire to maintain the TPA, continue collaborative regional marketing to attract tourists to the three cities, and continue supporting the SSRTA. The following desired outcomes improve upon the current successes of the SSRTA and destination marketing efforts by economic development staff in the three cities. Generally, there is consensus around the following desired outcomes: A. Improved communication, coordination, and oversight between the city staff and the SSRTA when the SSRTA's work plan and budget, and new initiatives are developed; B. Improved coordination between the cities related to SeaTac's administrative oversight of the SSRTA's work plan and budget; C. Increased communication and transparency between the SSRTA board and city staff; D. Determine the best approach to item "d)", related to marketing the region to recruit sporting events; E. Improved clarity related to the SSRTA's use of TPA, lodging tax, and other revenues for discrete projects; and F. The cities and the SSRTA should develop a shared approach to measuring success in achieving the purpose(s) of the TPA. A. Improved communication, coordination, and oversight between the city staff and the SSRTA when the SSRTA's work plan and budget, and new initiatives are developed. This outcome relates to both items "a)" the general promotion of the TPA region and "e)" the operations and administration of the SSRTA. The communication and coordination between the SSRTA and the cities over the last several years has varied significantly from city to city. This has led to several issues, specifically related to: brand identity, marketing within and outside of 50 miles, uncoordinated lobbying, and alignment between the SSRTA's work plan and the cities' work plans. There is also concern that the SSRTA work plan has broadened to include items not directly related to tourism promotion, which may lead to the inefficient duplication of efforts with other organizations (e.g. the Seattle Southside Chamber of Commerce). A standard approach to communication and coordination between the cities and the SSRTA should address Page 2 of 5 24 these issues. The cities also desire to ensure that the SSRTA's work plan serves the needs of the ratepayers, which would be addressed through improved support and oversight as the work plan is developed. The cities should work with the SSRTA to develop the next 5 -year work plan, scheduled for mid to late 2021 after the new SSRTA president is hired. The cities and SSRTA should establish a procedure to ensure coordination as new SSRTA initiatives are identified. The SSRTA work plans should be informed by, and supportive of, destination development initiatives and priorities of the TPA cities. B. Improved coordination between the cities related to SeaTac's administrative oversight of the SSRTA's work plan and budget. This outcome relates primarily to item "e)", the operations and administration of the SSRTA. There has been little coordination between the cities during the annual review and approval of the SSRTA budget by the City of SeaTac. City staff from Des Moines and Tukwila have attempted to establish direct contact with the SSRTA to varying degrees of success. There is no clear collective direction from the cities to the SSRTA related to the prioritization of work plan items, nor is there collaboration between the cities around a shared understanding of the SSRTA work plan. The cities should establish standardized working procedures for coordinating their work and communicating with the SSRTA. C. Increased communication and transparency between the SSRTA board and city staff. This outcome relates to both items "a)" the general promotion of the TPA region and "e)" the operations and administration of the SSRTA. The city staff have limited contact and insight into the decision-making processes of the SSRTA board. City staff also have not established a direct relationship with the SSRTA board members, so it is unclear if the SSRTA board understands the cities' role relative to the TPA, economic development, destination development, and marketing. Due to the lack of communication and transparency, it is unclear whether the SSRTA board and the cities are providing consistent direction and guidance to the SSRTA. City and SSRTA staff should partner to increase contact between city staff and SSRTA board members and ensure best practices for open public meetings. D. Determine the best approach to item "d)", related to marketing the region to recruit sporting events. Item "d)" is unusual in the ILA in that it represents a specific set of actions and outcomes rather than a broader goal or purpose statement. Because of the specific nature of the statement, it is unclear whether there has been significant progress in accomplishing item "d)". City staff discussed several possible desirable outcomes, including amendment of the ILA to focus on desired outcomes or possible clarification with the SSRTA regarding this specific item through a memorandum of understanding. Although there is general support to maintain a sport -related focus as it benefits the TPA cities and differentiates them within the region, the city staff did not reach consensus on how best to address this item. Page 3 of 5 25 E. Improved clarity related to the SSRTA's use of TPA, lodging tax, and other revenues for discrete projects. This outcome relates to both items "a)" the general promotion of the TPA region and "e)" the operations and administration of the SSRTA. In recent years, it has not been apparent what work by the SSRTA is funded by TPA funds, versus work that is funded by lodging tax or other revenue sources. This has led to some issues related to various work plan items and questions about whether an item is subject to the "50 mile rule" associated with TPA funds, or simply the reporting requirements associated with the lodging tax funds. It is not clear what SSRTA work plan items are subject to oversight as "TPA funded" work by SeaTac. In addition, it is important to ensure that the SSRTA will remain financially stable. The SSRTA and cities should work together to ensure that future work plan and budget materials clearly distinguish between SSRTA work plan items that are funded by the TPA and other work plan items and to ensure long term financial stability. City staff agreed that establishing common understanding of allowable uses and limitations of both TPA funds and lodging tax funds will result in improved communication and collective outcomes. F. The cities and the SSRTA should develop a shared approach to measuring success in achieving the purpose(s) of the TPA. This outcome relates to both items "a)" the general promotion of the TPA region and "e)" the operations and administration of the SSRTA. The ILA establishes the purpose of the Tourism Promotion Area and serves as a basis for the development of the SSRTA's work plan and budget. As it relates to overall compliance with applicable statutes and the terms of the Interlocal Agreement, the SSRTA and the cities have primarily relied on reviews by the Office of the Washington State Auditor' to ensure compliance. The State Auditor does not measure the effectiveness of specific work plan items. The cities and the SSRTA should develop a shared approach and understanding around how success is measured and communicated to staff, ratepayers, and City Councils. Recommended Next Steps The city staff generally identified two possible approaches moving forward: 1. The creation of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the three cities; and 2. Amendment(s) and/or an addendum to the ILA. The majority of the desired outcomes above represent an improvement to communication, coordination, and transparency either between the cities, or between the cities and the SSRTA. However, creating a permanent agreement between the cities, and possibly the SSRTA, is desirable to avoid the same concerns and issues that prompted this review. Consequently, staff 1 The Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee (JLARC) reporting primarily focuses on the use of lodging tax funds for the purposes authorized under the applicable statutory authority (RCW 67.28). Page 4 of 5 26 from the three cities recommend establishing some form of permanent (durable) agreement related to the above desired outcomes. The city staff discussed both options to creating a permanent operational agreement but did not reach consensus regarding a recommended approach. Presuming the City Managers' concur, staff will meet over the next few months to achieve the outcomes described and develop the permanent agreement. Page 5 of 5 27 28 Attachment 2 - Recommended Approach This recommended approach is based upon the 4/28/2021 memorandum and joint city / SSRTA discussions in 2021. These items are intended to provide a summary of an agreed approach between the cities and the SSRTA, with the goal of improving the current operating relationship between all organizations. General items 1. These are non-binding agreements, which will be periodically reviewed. In the event this approach is not successful, the cities could consider binding agreements. 2. The cities and SSRTA will regularly review this approach and adjust as needed. 3. When the SSRTA develops an updated 5 year work plan, the cities and SSRTA will engage in a comprehensive review of how the ILA/TPA is filling cities' needs and whether the SSRTA remains aligned with the cities strategic plans 4. In its role as the legislative and administrative authority, SeaTac will: a. Facilitate joint city direction to the SSRTA on prioritization of work plan items, including: i. Annual review of SSRTA's proposed budget / work plan by each city ii. Ensuring opportunity for clarification iii. Expectation that SSRTA would reasonably adjust work plan to address concerns iv. SeaTac to convey joint city direction / guidance to the SSRTA board / president v. Informing SSRTA stakeholder outreach for work plan development b. Work with SSRTA to share budget and board appointment information with Des Moines / Tukwila in a timely way c. Seek meaningful resolution of disputes between the 3 cities and the SSRTA i. The cities and the SSRTA will generally seek to reach consensus ii. When the cities cannot reach consensus, SeaTac will work with the SSRTA to address the majority's concerns 5. All three cities and the SSRTA are committed to clear and open communication and improved coordination between the cities and the SSRTA. To achieve this, the three cities and SSRTA agree to: d. Provide consistent information and content to the community and City Councils, regarding: i. TPA funds (limitations, uses, etc.) ii. Lodging tax monies (limitations, uses, etc.) iii. Performance metrics iv. Consistent understanding of funding limitations (e.g. 50 -mile rule) e. Support methods for sharing information between the three jurisdictions i. Semiannual "coordination meeting", or similar ii. Establish general awareness of work plan items iii. Focus on sharing information that may affect other jurisdictions' work / TPA iv. Avoid "surprise" council / committee briefings regarding the TPA f. SSRTA Budget materials i. Clearly identify TPA funds, lodging tax revenues, and other revenues ii. Clearly identify expenditures as TPA, lodging tax, or other 29 g. iii. For "other" sources of revenues / expenditures — establish process to evaluate / address impacts on TPA priorities / work plan items Meet regularly to focus on the following topics i. Work plan / budget 1. Develop 5 -year strategic plan 2. Review annual work plan / budget 3. Focus areas: a. Brand identity b. Marketing focus (50 mile) c. Alignment between cities d. Avoiding conflicts / duplication of efforts 4. Determine best approach to marketing the region to recruit sporting events ii. Establish a process for cities / SSRTA to collaborate on setting lobbying priorities and performing any lobbying actions 1. The cities and SSRTA recognize that the SSRTA is limited by State law in its ability to lobby 6. The three cities and SSRTA desire clear, meaningful performance metrics for the SSRTA's work. h. The cities / SSRTA will jointly develop performance metrics relative to the use of TPA funds, which will result in: i. Shared reporting ii. Shared terminology iii. An established level of performance i. Regular meetings between the city staff and the SSRTA board / board representative i. Timed to match board decision-making re: work plan and budget ii. Opportunity for formal communication between cities and SSRTA board / board representative 30 SEATTLE on SOUTHSIDE 'ILI Regional Tourism Authority 3100 S176th ST SEATTLE,WA 98188 P: 206.575.2489 April 11, 2022 Hello Tukwila City Councilmember, As the new CEO of the Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority, I am finding that my arrival in the region and joining the RTA have come at an opportune time. Tourism and visitation in our region are finally showing positive signs of emerging from COVID-19. As the RTA team prepared for 2022 and beyond, we felt that a one- year operational plan was needed as we work towards creating a new multi-year strategic plan. The plan for crafting the 2023-2027 strategic plan will involve input from you and all our regional stakeholders. I would like to share with you the RTA's plans for the upcoming year by providing you with a copy of the RTA's 2022 Work Plan. As a steward of public funds, the RTA operates under a multi-year strategic plan. The 2009-2014 plan identified a focus on community alliances, enhancing products and services, growing visitor segments, and nurturing the brand to enhance the local economy and to enhance the perception of being a superior destination. The 2016-2021 strategic plan identified key the areas that the RTA would provide benefit to the region and result in increasing visitation while extending the average length of stay and encouraging additional visitor spending. The 2022 Work Plan is intended to provide the organization direction as we create a longer term post-COVID-19 strategic plan to market the region. The core objectives of increasing visitation, having guests stay longer and spend more in our region are still critical to supporting our tourism industry. For 2022, we feel that there is a need to enhance the perception and awareness of the region now more than ever before. We are going to focus on re -introducing the Seattle Southside region to travelers, groups, and corporations in this new and very different travel environment. Raising awareness of the destination by highlighting the unique identity of each of our destination cities and focusing on the needs of leisure and corporate travelers, meetings, cruise passengers, and sports participants is the foundation of our upcoming strategies. In short, the RTA is looking at 2022 as a year of re -imagining the region through redesign of our image, messaging, and channels that we communicate to our target audiences. I hope that you are as excited as we are about what lies ahead for Seattle Southside. I would be happy to answer any questions that you may have. Please feel free to reach out to me. Sincerely, Mark Everton, CEO 31 32 SE/Il III ►�� SOUTHSIDE ►iL� SeaTac I Tukwila I Des Moines SEATTLE SOUTHSIDE REGIONAL TOURISM AUTHORITY 2022 WORK PLAN These goals are the core mission of Seattle Southside RTA: 1. Increase the number of tourists and groups coming to Seattle Southside. 2. Increase the average length of stay. 3. Increase visitor spending at businesses in the cities of SeaTac, Tukwila, and Des Moines. 4. Enhance the perception and awareness of the region as a preferred travel destination. As the Regional Tourism Authority, our staff will work together with partners, stakeholders, and community members to build toward being the destination that visitors and groups know and prefer for accessing everything the Pacific Northwest has to offer, emphasizing the experiences within Seattle Southside. The travel environment is ever-changing andholds many new possibilities. Seattle Southside is well positioned to grow and thrive while meeting the increased demand to visit our beautiful Northwest region and exceeding visitor expectations. The strategy will be to turn the spotlight on the varied opportunities in our region and welcome people who have not been here in the past. We are going to focus on re -introducing the Seattle Southside region to travelers, groups, and corporations in this new and very different environment. Raising awareness of the destination, highlighting the unique identity of each of our destination cities, and focusing on leveraging our sports facilities will support the foundation of our upcoming strategies. The following objectives and tactics make up the RTA's organizational plans for 2022 and will help set the stage for developing a new long-term strategic plan. SEATTLE ►,J SOUTHSIDE Al Regional Tourism Authority For more information about Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority, please visit www.SeattleSouthside.com, email info@SeattleSouthside.com or call 206-575-2489. 34 MARKETING & COMMUNICATION DIVISION The marketing and communications division will be heavily focused on developing new advertising campaigns and strategies, rebuilding the website, updating and creating content and revising the visual identity to increasing awareness of and visitation to the destination. With the addition of a few new key staff members, we will be able to bring some marketing programs in house to expand the reach of our services to partners and spreading our message. Objective #1: Develop and implement leisure advertising strategy targeting prospective travelers to increase visitation to the region, spend with partner businesses and awareness of the destination. TACTICS • Evaluate Agency Relationship: Select most qualified agency partner to help develop and execute new campaigns, programs, advertising opportunities such as remarketing social and website visitors. Target travel profiles, focus on new audience opportunities (cruise) and seasonal opportunities. • Refresh Visual Identity: Update visual identity for use in all advertising materials, website and collateral. Direct focus to the destination and less on the RTA. • Maximize Research Tools: Study points of interest throughout the region and Seattle Southside to understand the flow of visitor travel. Track occupancy and visitor length of stay and visitor spending including revenue to evaluate recovery and shape future plans. • Develop New Campaigns: Using research and agency collaboration, refine travel profiles based on motivations and assess regional perceptions to determine how best to reach and communicate with high impact travelers. Review social media advertising opportunities such as a newsletter subscription campaign and launch program. Develop strategy for in -market marketing such as SEM, in-room/hotel/shuttle/airport messaging, geo fenced messages, etc. • Execute Advertising Campaigns: While developing new campaigns, continue interim ad campaign focused on Exploring Seattle Southside that will run until new creative is launched. Continue to build awareness of Seattle Southside and increase travel consideration via search and social. Objective #2: Increase website visits and visitor intent actions. TACTICS • Audit and Redesign Website: Audit website content to streamline experiences and remove or update underperforming or irrelevant content. Rebuild website using a new software that is more robust, user friendly and open source. Incorporate updated visual identity, research 35 and content strategies. Develop custom maps and itineraries and create more digital experiences to convert potential travelers. Review data capture processes and update or add to various sections of the website to secure more opportunities for targeted marketing. • Enhance SEO and SEM: Refine SEO strategy to ensure current and new content is targeting the intended audience. Continue content audit of website ensuring all elements are updated and created with the most effective SEO content. Bring Search Engine Marketing initiatives in house based on agency strategy guidance to reduce third party costs and maintain flexibility and control. • Monitor and Boost Website Health: Monitor website health and performance by fixing errors, tracking CMS backend configuration and ensuring third party service providers are working properly. Identify landing pages or microsites to build to capture search traffic or advertising campaign traffic and provide a more robust experience resulting in conversions. • Develop Robust Content: Optimize content and meta data to meet best industry standards. A/B test content to ensure the best experience. Based on editorial calendar, update home page, landing pages, menus, content, etc. to enhance seasonal campaigns. Modify event calendar to generate interest and awareness about upcoming events and make it easier for new events to be added. Coordinate photo and video shoots for partners, events and activities to ensure current content and support partners with their advertising efforts. Optimize content for use on all platforms to extend the length and reach of everything produced. Determine new video and photo assets needed vs. what can be edited to create new content. Objective #3: Enhance regional awareness and perception of Seattle Southside including tourism partners. TACTICS • Continue Influencer Campaign: Review successes and opportunities from 2021 Influencer campaign and develop and launch 2022 campaign. • Bring Public Relations Initiatives in House: Determine best program to track and report activities. Develop media pitching calendar based on target publications editorial calendars, seasonal events, RTA activities, partner updates, etc. • Strengthen Media Connections: Maintain CRM database of media outlets to receive pitches. Connect with relevant industry groups such as PRSA to network and learn best practices. Send out monthly Calls 36 for Content to partners to develop and enhance pitches, website and social content. Develop monthly newsletters targeting audiences to increase engagement with web content. Coordinate TBEX travel show including booth and fam tour to generate positive publicity and build contact database. Redesign the layout and content of the Media section on the website to be more informative to all media including potential social media influencers, travel writers, fact checkers, etc. • Enhance Media Services: Develop partner editorial calendar to share schedule of distribution. Build out custom fam tours and corresponding web experience/ tour/savings pass. Update media kit to include latest destination information. Conduct PR perception study with regional and national media. • Bring Social Media Initiatives in house: Ensure content and voice are consistent with the brand strategy. Use editorial calendar to determine cadence and message of social media posts and ensure interactions are monitored on regular basis on all accounts. Revise social media policy to ensure best practices for public agencies are being met. Monitor user generated content to share on web, social, newsletters, collateral, etc. Objective #4: Enhance and develop new visitor experiences to support tourism partners and increase length of stay and visitor spend. TACTICS • Strengthen Scenes Program: Develop new strategy for Scenes program including new locations and Trail experience. Create marketing plan to support the program. • Develop New Passes: Explore additional passes for development such as ale trails, happy hour, short term itineraries, media fams, etc. • Enhance Collateral: Revise the travel planner and other collateral for a digital experience. Print a limited number for mail requests. • Expand Outreach to Non -Hotel Partners: Create awareness about services provided by RTA and enhance participation in programs. Maintain the monthly Insider newsletter. 37 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION The RTA business development strategy for the meetings, sports, and tour/travel market is based on a partner -centric approach with sales and marketing efforts focused on steering business directly to partners. The strategy combines content marketing tactics with traditional sales efforts, partner sales support initiatives, and programs to connect partners directly to planners. Messaging to planners will highlight the assets within the destination, branding the region of Seattle Southside as an ideal destination for meetings, sporting events, tour groups, and packaged travel and the RTA as a resource for supporting and enhancing events. Equally as important, focus will be placed on developing tools, collateral, trainings, events, and opportunities that will support partners' ability to access, acquire, and close business. Objective #1: Increase Meetings Business for hotel partners within the Association, Corporate, and SMERF markets. TACTICS • Rebuild Meetings Microsite: Revise and rebuild microsite for a meeting planner audience with a focus on optimizing usability and usefulness for the planner. • Media Buy: Strategize, develop, and manage media buy and implementation of marketing campaigns to group audiences, focused on highlighting partner hotels and venues, Seattle Southside assets, and branding Seattle Southside as an ideal location for meetings. Pursue strategic marketing partnerships with third party planners and booking agencies with a focus on strategies that steer business directly to partners. • Planner Newsletters: Produce monthly newsletter for a meeting planner audience to maintain connections with database of clients. Newsletter content will also be distributed to third party mailing lists. • Content Creation: Develop new content for the meetings microsite (web content/articles). Content will 38 contribute to newsletter and social media strategies. • Social Media Engagement: Generate social media content relevant to business development. Connect with planners through Linkedln, comment on posts, and look for ways to heighten engagement, such as utilizing live video. • Familiarization Tours & Events: Plan familiarization tours and events that showcase Seattle Southside facilities and assets. • Connect One on One with Planners: Through active attendance at sales conventions, sales missions, events, and tradeshows, present the benefits of bringing meetings to Seattle Southside. • Industry Involvement: Attend networking events, continue involvement with industry associations (WSAE, PCMA, etc.), volunteer and/or support industry associations (board appointments, committees, events, etc.), and pursue opportunities for stage time/sponsorships to increase Seattle Southside's visibility. • Launch Partner Showcase Program: Develop scope, launch, and manage program to enable more partners to attend approved sales conventions and tradeshows. Coordinate pre -show promotions, post -show follow-ups, design collateral pieces, manage show activations, assist with appointment requests, and collaborate on appointment participation. Objective #2: Increase sports events in or near Seattle Southside with an emphasis on maximizing opportunities for partner hotels to obtain room nights from participants or attendees. TACTICS • Rebuild Sports Microsite: Revise and rebuild microsite for a sports planner audience with a focus on optimizing usability and usefulness for the planner. • Media Buy: Strategize, develop, and manage media buy and implementation of marketing campaigns to sports planner audiences, focused on sports facility assets. • Planner Newsletters: Produce newsletter for a sports planner audience to maintain connections with database of clients. Newsletter content will also be distributed to third party mailing lists. • Content Creation: Develop new content for the sports microsite (web content/articles). Content will contribute to newsletter and social media strategies. • Social Media Engagement: Submit posts for content to MarCom for distribution on social media channels. Engage with sports planners on Facebook, Linkedln, and Playeasy. • Familiarization Tours & Events: Partner with neighboring DMOs and the Seattle Sports Commission on familiarization tours and events that showcase Seattle Southside facilities and assets. • Connect One on One with Planners: Through active attendance at sales conventions, sales missions, events, and tradeshows, present the benefits of bringing events to Seattle Southside. • Industry Involvement: Attend networking events, continue involvement with industry associations (Seattle Sports Commission, etc.) volunteer and/or support industry associations (board appointments, committees, events, etc.), and pursue opportunities for stage time/sponsorships to increase Seattle Southside's visibility. • Manage Housing Program for Sports: Work with EventConnect, Starfire Sports, and other tournament organizers in the region to increase and optimize utilization of the RTA's housing platform. • Connect with Regional Sports Facilities: Pursue connections with sports facilities in neighboring cities to collaborate on bringing sports events to the region and developing a sports infrastructure. • Maintain Relationships with Facility Partners: Connect with Seattle Southside sports facility partners to explore ways to enhance partnerships and open up sports event opportunities. 39 Objective #3: Increase tour and travel business for partner hotels with an emphasis on the cruise market. TACTICS • Rebuild Tour Industry Microsite: Revise and rebuild microsite for a tour/travel planner audience with a focus on optimizing usability and usefulness for the planner. • Media Buy: Strategize, develop, and manage media buy and implementation of marketing campaigns to tour/travel planner audiences with a focus on strategies that steer business directly to partners. • Planner Newsletters: Produce newsletter for a tour/travel planner audience to maintain connections with database of clients. Newsletter content will also be distributed to third party mailing lists. • Content Creation: Develop new content for the tour/travel microsite (web content/articles). Content will contribute to newsletter and social media strategies. • Social Media Engagement: Submit posts for content to MarCom for distribution on social media channels. Engage with tour/travel planners on Facebook, Linkedln, etc. • Familiarization Tours & Events: Partner with neighboring DMOs and the Port of Seattle on familiarization tours and events that showcase Seattle Southside facilities and assets. • Connect One on One with Planners: Through active attendance at sales conventions, sales missions, events, and tradeshows, present the benefits of Seattle Southside. • Industry Involvement: Attend networking events, continue involvement with industry associations (Skal, NTA, PSBTA, etc.) volunteer and/or support industry associations (board appointments, committees, events, etc.), and pursue opportunities for stage time/sponsorships to increase Seattle Southside's visibility. • Connect Partners to Cruise Market: Pursue ways to educate, connect, and optimize cruise business for partners through events such as a symposium/panel presentation on how to work with the cruise industry. Objective #4: Support business partners' group sales by providing partners with impactful opportunities and marketing/sales tools. TACTICS • Rebuild Partner Microsite & Extranet: Revise and rebuild microsite and Extranet for partners with a focus on optimizing usability and usefulness for the planner. • Coalesce Partner Sales Staff: Develop a group identity to bring together Seattle Southside partner hotel and event venue sales staff. Brand this group to create a more 40 unified destination and a more engaged sales community. • Understand Partner Needs and Status: Meet with select hotel partners regularly to discuss business development opportunities, their objectives and roadblocks, and find ways the RTA can support them achieve their goals through marketing or partnership services. • Sales Bootcamp: Develop a professional development series to help partners at hotels and event venues maximize their sales process. • Partner Marketing Support: Provide hotel and venue partners with marketing support and/or product toolkits to assist in their sales efforts (such as video, collateral, etc.). Needs will be identified through routine communications with partners. • Promote Director of Sales' Collaboration: Provide Seattle Southside Director of Sales' the opportunity to come together and discuss their challenges, solutions, and opportunities. • Manage SeaTac Hotels — Shopping Shuttle: Optimize utilization of the shuttle through communication with hotels, promotions for riders, and management of program. • Planner Focus Group: Invite planners to experience Seattle Southside during a multi -day familiarization event and participate in a focus group to review the region's assets and the RTA's marketing collateral. Involve the IMPACT Group whenever possible and share the resulting report with partners to better equip them in understanding the planner perspective. • Planner Advisory Group: Recruit planners (from Planner Focus Group) to join a Seattle Southside Planner Advisory Group. Feature this group on marketing materials providing testimonials for the destination and utilize members for review of new ads, programs, or initiatives from the RTA as well as from the IMPACT Group in order to garner the planner perspective. • Business Development Data Sharing: Using data sources such as Cvent, STR, and Zartico, regularly provide partners with data and information relevant to business development. Produce a Partner Budgeting Toolkit by Q3 to support hotel planning and budgeting for next year. 41 SEATTLE ►,J SOUTHSIDE �l Regional Tourism Authority For more information about Seattle Southside Regional Tourism Authority, please visit www.SeattleSouthside.com, email info@SeattleSouthside.com or call 206-575-2489. 42