Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2022-05-23 Item 4F - Update - Minimum Wage Initiative EffortCOUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS A.41,----- Initials ITEM No. 44, Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review Q o 5/23/22 LH 4.F. 290$ ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: LAUREL HUMPHREY ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 5/23/22 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Minimum Wage Initiative Effort CATEGORY 11 Mfg Discussion Date 5/23/22 ❑ Motion Mtg Date ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mtg Date ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑ Other Mtg Date SPONSOR 11 Council ❑ Mayor ❑ Admin Svcs ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PW SPONSOR'S The Finance & Governance Committee requested a fact -based report on the current Transit SUMMARY Riders Union Minimum Wage Initiative Effort and forwarded the topic to the Committee of the Whole. REVIEWED BY ❑ Trans&Infrastructure Svcs ❑ Community Svcs/Safety ❑ LTAC ❑ Arts Comm. DATE: 4/25/22 COMMITTEE // ❑ Finance & Governance ❑ Planning & Community Dev. Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. CHAIR: QUINN RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. COMMITTEE COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $ Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 5/23/22 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 5/23/22 Information Memo dated 4/14/2022 (updated after 4/25 FIN Committee) Transit Riders Union Initiative Text Association of Washington Cities Guidelines for Elected and Appointed Officials Minutes from the 4/25 Finance & Governance Committee Meeting 217 218 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Finance & Governance Committee FROM: Laurel Humphrey, Legislative Analyst DATE: April 14, 2022 (Updated following 4125/22 Committee) SUBJECT: Minimum Wage Initiative ISSUE The Finance & Governance Committee requested information on the current minimum wage initiative effort, the initiative process and the City Council's role, and minimum wage laws in SeaTac and Seattle. BACKGROUND Power of Initiative Tukwila Municipal Code Section 1.12.010 grants Tukwila residents the power of initiative and referendum according to State law. The power of initiative refers to the authority of the voters to directly initiate and enact legislation. To do this, an individual or group must create a petition and obtain signatures from at least 15% of the total number of registered voters on the day of the last preceding general election. If the proper form and number of signatures is sufficient, the City Council is required to either pass the proposed ordinance or place it on the ballot. The City Council could also pass its own ordinance related to minimum wages and standards under its existing authority. Current Initiative Effort The Transit Riders Union is currently gathering signatures for an initiative petition that proposes to "establish fair labor standards and protect the rights of workers by: (1) ensuring that the vast majority of employees in the City of Tukwila receive a minimum wage comparable to employees in neighboring cities of SeaTac and Seattle; (2) requiring covered employers to offer additional hours of work to qualified part-time employees before hiring new employees to fill those hours; and (3) adopting enforcement requirements." It requires that every large employer pay an hourly wage not less than the wage in the City of SeaTac beginning July 1, 2023, then adjusted annually based upon 100% of the annual average growth rate of the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue CPI -W. Unlike SeaTac, the proposal would cover all sectors, not just hospitality and transportation. Employers with 15-500 employees worldwide would get a phase-in period, and businesses with fewer than 15 employees or an annual gross revenue under $2 million would be exempt. The complete initiative text is attached to this memo and includes enforcement provisions that would be the responsibility of the city, which is not budgeted currently and may require additional staff resources. The Transit Riders Union needs 1,661 valid signatures based upon the last general election. The TRU has indicated via email to the City Clerk an anticipated submission in mid-June. 219 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 Initiative Process The following is excerpted from the Municipal Research and Services Center's "Initiative and Referendum Guide for Washington Cities and Charter Counties." INITIATIVE PROCESS IN A NONCHARTER CODE CITY Assuming that a code city has formally adopted the power of initiative and that the subject of an ordinance is an appropriate one for an initiative, the initiative process is basically as follows: 1. The proponent of the initiative must obtain signatures on the petition equal in number to 15 percent of the total number of registered voters within the city as of the date of the last preceding city general election. RCW 35A.11.100. 2. Everyone who signs the initiative petition must add to their signature his or her place of residence, giving the street and the number. Petitions must also be printed in the form required by RCW 35A.01.040. These requirements are outlined in detail in Appendix K. 3. The signed petition must be filed with the officer designated to receive the petition (usually the city clerk), who then has three working days to transmit it to the county auditor who will review and determine the validity and adequacy of the signatures on the petition. After review, the county auditor must attach a certificate to the petition indicating whether or not it has been signed by a sufficient number of registered voters. This written certificate is then transmitted to the city officer with whom the petition was originally filed. 4. If the number of signatures is found to be insufficient, the petitioners have 10 additional days to amend the petition by supplying additional signatures. The amended petition is then resubmitted to the receiving officer who retransmits the petition to the county auditor. If the county auditor finds the number of signatures insufficient a second time, then the petition is returned to the person filing it. Any taxpayer then has the option of filing an action in superior court to determine if the petition is sufficient. 5. If the county auditor determines that the number of signatures is sufficient, then the city council has two options. The first is for the city council to pass the proposed ordinance, without alteration, within 20 days after the county auditor's certificate of sufficiency has been received by the council. The second is to submit the measure to a vote of the people. 6. The ballot title of any initiative is to be composed of three elements: (a) an identification of the enacting legislative body and a statement of the subject matter; (b) a concise description of the measure; (c) a question asking the voters whether the enactment should be approved or rejected by the voters. The concise statement must be prepared by the city attorney and may not exceed 75 words. RCW 29A.36.071. 220 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 7. Once the ballot title is filed, the county auditor will notify the proponents of the initiative of the exact language of the ballot title. If the persons filing the initiative are dissatisfied with the ballot title formulated by the city attorney, they may file an appeal within 10 days to the superior court of the county where the issue is to appear on the ballot. They must indicate their objections and ask for amendment. The court will hold a hearing and render a decision certifying the correct ballot title. The decision of the superior court is final. RCW 29A.36.090. 8. The election will be held by special election not less than 45 days after the certificate of sufficiency is received by the council. The special election dates are listed in RCW 29A.04.330. (See Appendix L.) If a general election is scheduled within 90 days, the election on the initiative will take place on that date instead of on the next special election date (assuming that the general election date is at least 45 days after sufficiency of the petitions is certified). 9. The city clerk must cause the ordinance that will be submitted to the voters at an election to be published at least once in each of the daily newspapers in the city between five and 20 days before the election. If there are no daily newspapers, then publication must be in each of the weekly newspapers. 10. If a majority of the number of votes cast favor the proposed measure, it is adopted and will become effective upon certification of the election results. An ordinance that has been adopted by means of the initiative process after an election of the people may be repealed or amended only by a vote of the people. This means that the city council may not merely amend or repeal such an ordinance, as is usually the case. However, the city council may initiate the amendment or repeal of the ordinance and then submit the proposition to a vote of the people Other Minimum Wage Laws Jurisdiction Rate Annual Increase Source United States $7.25 No D.O.L. Website Washington State $14.49 Yes, based upon the US City Average CPI - W. Link to RCW Seattle $17.27 ($15.75 for smaller businesses) Yes, based upon the Seattle -Tacoma - Bremerton CPI -W Link to code. SeaTac $17.53 for hospitality and transportation workers Yes, tied to Washington State's rate of increase. Link to code. 221 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 4 Political Limitations City staff and Councilmembers are prohibited by law from using public resources related to supporting or opposing a ballot initiative or making a statement implying a city position, unless that position has been approved by the full Council and meets the public notice standards required by State law. Councilmembers may use their personal resources and may make personal statements related to ballot initiatives. Committee Follow-up The Finance & Governance Committee discussed this information at its April 25, 2022 meeting and requested the following: 1. CityAttorney Input The City Attorney has been asked to review the information and will follow up under separate cover. 2. Enforcement in SeaTac and Seattle SeaTac's code provides that persons claiming violations of the chapter may bring action against the employer in King County Superior court. It also required the City to adopt auditing procedures as well as authorizes the City Attorney to investigate and initiate legal action, but does not obligate the City Attorney to expend funds/resources in pursuit of this. Seattle's code delegates enforcement to the Office of Labor Standards, which is a City department with 31 FTEs. The Office of Labor Standards will initiate an investigation, make a determination, and issue a notice of violation if appropriate. 3. Can the City Council amend the initiative language prior to putting it on the ballot? No. The City Council must submit the proposed ordinance without alteration. 4. Provide additional information on how Councilmembers can legally interact with ballot measures. See added second attachment to this memo. RECOMMENDATION Discussion only. ATTACHMENTS • Transit Riders Union Initiative • Association of Washington Cities: Guidelines for Elected and Appointed Officials' Participation in Election Activity 222 AN ORDINANCE concerning labor standards for certain employees. Section 1. Findings. 1. The people of the City of Tukwila hereby adopt this citizen initiative addressing labor standards for certain employees, for the purpose of ensuring that, to the extent reasonably practicable, people employed in Tukwila have good wages and access to sufficient hours of work. 2. The City of Tukwila is one of largest job centers in Washington State, including thousands of retail and food service jobs at and around the Westfield Southcenter Mall. Wages and working conditions in Tukwila contribute to setting the standard for the entire region 3. The statewide minimum wage is not sufficient to afford rising rents and costs of living in Washington State. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition's Out of Reach 2021 report, a worker making Washington's minimum wage would have to work 70 hours each week to afford a modest one -bedroom rental home at Fair Market Rent. 4. When working families earn insufficient income due to low wages and involuntary under- employment, they struggle to pay for basic necessities like health care, child care, and groceries, and they are more likely to be evicted and become homeless. 5. Tukwila's neighboring cities of SeaTac and Seattle enacted higher minimum wages in 2013 and 2014, but until now Tukwila has not followed suit. Section 2. Intent. It is the intent of the people to establish fair labor standards and protect the rights of workers by: (1) ensuring that the vast majority of employees in the City of Tukwila receive a minimum wage comparable to employees in neighboring cities of SeaTac and Seattle; (2) requiring covered employers to offer additional hours of work to qualified part-time employees before hiring new employees to fill those hours; and (3) adopting enforcement requirements. Section 3. Large Employers Shall Pay Minimum Wages Comparable to Those in Neighboring Cities. 1. Effective July 1, 2023, every large employer shall pay to each employee an hourly wage of not less than the 2022 "living wage rate" in the City of SeaTac, established pursuant to SeaTac Municipal Code Section 7.45.050, adjusted for 2023 by the annual rate of inflation. 2. On January 1, 2024, and on each January 1 thereafter, the hourly minimum wage shall increase by the annual rate of inflation to maintain employee purchasing power. 3. By December 31, 2022, and by October 15 of each year thereafter, the Finance Department shall establish and publish the applicable hourly minimum wage for the following year using the annual rate of inflation. -1- 223 4. For purposes of this chapter, the annual rate of inflation means 100 percent of the annual average growth rate of the bi-monthly Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue Area Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, termed CPI -W, for the 12 - month period ending in August, provided that the percentage increase shall not be less than zero. 5. An employer must pay to its employees: a. All tips and gratuities; and b. All service charges as defined under RCW 49.46.160 except those that, pursuant to RCW 49.46.160, are itemized as not being payable to the employee or employees servicing the customer. Tips and service charges paid to an employee are in addition to, and may not count towards, the employee's hourly minimum wage. Section 4. Other Covered Employers Shall Have a Multiyear Phase -In Period. Other covered employers shall phase in the new minimum wage, as follows: 1. Effective July 1, 2023, other covered employers shall pay employees not less than the hourly minimum wage established under Section 3 minus Two Dollars ($2) per hour. 2. Effective July 1, 2024, other covered employers shall pay employees not less than the hourly minimum wage established under Section 3 minus One Dollar ($1) per hour. 3. Effective July 1, 2025, and thereafter, all covered employers shall pay employees not less than the hourly minimum wage established under Section 3. Section 5. Coverage and Employer Classifications. 1. Covered employers must pay employees at least the minimum wage established by this chapter for each hour worked within the City. 2. Employer classification for the current calendar year will be calculated based upon the average number of employees during all weeks in the previous calendar year in which the employer had at least one employee. For employers that did not have any employees during the previous calendar year, classification will be based upon the average number of employees during the most recent three months of the current year. In this determination, all employees will be counted, regardless of their location, and including employees who worked in full-time employment, part-time employment, joint employment, temporary employment, or through the services of a temporary services or staffing agency or similar entity. 3. Employer classification for the current calendar year will be calculated based upon the gross revenue for the previous year. For employers that did not have gross revenue during the previous calendar year, annual gross revenue will be calculated from the gross revenue during the most recent three months of the current year. 4. For the purposes of employer classification, separate entities will be considered a single employer if they form an integrated enterprise or they are under joint control by one of -2- 224 those entities or a separate entity. The factors to consider in making this assessment include, but are not limited to: a. Degree of interrelation between the operations of multiple entities; b. Degree to which the entities share common management; c. Centralized control of labor relations; and d. Degree of common ownership or financial control over the entities. Section 6. Part -Time Employees Shall Have Fair Access to Additional Hours. 1. Before hiring additional employees or subcontractors, including hiring through the use of temporary services or staffing agencies, covered employers must offer additional hours of work to existing employees who, in the employer's good faith and reasonable judgment, have the skills and experience to perform the work, and shall use a reasonable, transparent, and nondiscriminatory process to distribute the hours of work among those existing employees. 2. This section shall not be construed to require any employer to offer an employee work hours if the employer would be required to compensate the employee at time -and -a -half or other premium rate under any law or collective bargaining agreement, nor to prohibit any employer from offering such work hours. Section 7. Retaliation Prohibited. 1. No employer or any other person shall interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of, or the attempt to exercise, any right protected under this chapter. 2. No employer or any other person shall take any adverse action against any person because the person has exercised in good faith the rights under this chapter. Such rights include but are not limited to the right to make inquiries about the rights protected under this chapter; the right to inform others about their rights under this chapter; the right to inform the person's employer, union, or similar organization, and/or the person's legal counsel or any other person about an alleged violation of this chapter; the right to bring a civil action for an alleged violation of this chapter; the right to testify in a proceeding under or related to this chapter; the right to refuse to participate in an activity that would result in a violation of city, state, or federal law; and the right to oppose any policy, practice, or act that is unlawful under this chapter. 3. For the purposes of this section, an adverse action means denying a job or promotion, demoting, terminating, failing to rehire after a seasonal interruption of work, threatening, penalizing, retaliating, engaging in unfair immigration -related practices, filing a false report with a government agency, changing an employee's status to nonemployee, decreasing or declining to provide additional work hours when they otherwise would have been offered, scheduling an employee for hours outside of their availability, or otherwise discriminating against any person for any reason prohibited by this chapter. "Adverse action" for an employee may involve any aspect of employment, including pay, work -3- 225 hours, responsibilities, or other material change in the terms and conditions of employment. 4. No employer or any other person shall communicate to a person exercising rights protected under this chapter, directly or indirectly, the willingness to inform a government employee that the person is not lawfully in the United States, or to report, or to make an implied or express assertion of a willingness to report, suspected citizenship or immigration status of the person or a family member of the person to a federal, state, or local agency because the person has exercised a right under this chapter. 5. It shall be a rebuttable presumption of retaliation if an employer or any other person takes an adverse action against a person within 90 days of the person's exercise of any right protected in this chapter. However, in the case of seasonal work that ended before the close of the 90 -day period, the presumption also applies if the employer fails to rehire a former employee at the next opportunity for work in the same position. The employer may rebut the presumption with clear and convincing evidence that the adverse action was taken for a permissible purpose. 6. Standard of Proof. Proof of retaliation under this chapter shall be sufficient upon a showing that an employer or any other person has taken an adverse action against a person and the person's exercise of rights protected in this chapter was a motivating factor in the adverse action, unless the employer can prove that the action would have been taken in the absence of such protected activity. 7. The protections afforded under this section shall apply to any person who mistakenly but in good faith alleges violations of this chapter. Section 8. Enforcement. 1. Any person or class of persons that suffers financial injury as a result of a violation of this chapter or is the subject of prohibited retaliation under this chapter, or any other individual or entity acting on their behalf, may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against the employer or other person violating this chapter and, upon prevailing, shall be awarded reasonable attorney fees and costs and such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation including, without limitation, the payment of any unpaid wages plus interest due to the person and liquidated damages in an additional amount of up to twice the unpaid wages; compensatory damages; and a penalty payable to any aggrieved party of up to $5,000 if the aggrieved party was subject to prohibited retaliation. For the purposes of this section, an aggrieved party means an employee or other person who suffers tangible or intangible harm due to an employer or other person's violation of this chapter. Interest shall accrue from the date the unpaid wages were first due at the higher of twelve percent per annum or the maximum rate permitted under RCW 19.52.020. 2. For purposes of determining membership within a class of persons entitled to bring an action under this section, two or more employees are similarly situated if they: a. Are or were employed by the same employer or employers, whether concurrently or otherwise, at some point during the applicable statute of limitations period; -4- 226 b. Allege one or more violations that raise similar questions as to liability; and c. Seek similar forms of relief. d. Employees shall not be considered dissimilar solely because their claims seek damages that differ in amount, or their job titles or other means of classifying employees differ in ways that are unrelated to their claims. 3. Each covered employer shall retain records as required by RCW 49.46.070, as well as such information as the City may require to confirm compliance with this chapter. If an employer fails to retain such records, there shall be a presumption, rebuttable by clear and convincing evidence, that the employer violated this chapter for the periods and for each employee for whom records were not retained. 4. Employers shall permit authorized City representatives access to work sites and relevant records for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the chapter and investigating complaints of noncompliance, including production for inspection and copying of employment records. The City may designate representatives, including city contractors and representatives of unions or worker advocacy organizations, to access the worksite and relevant records. 5. Complaints that any provision of this chapter has been violated may also be presented to the City Attorney, who is hereby authorized to investigate and, if they deem appropriate, initiate legal or other action to remedy any violation of this chapter. 6. The City has the authority to issue administrative citations and to order injunctive relief including reinstatement, restitution, payment of back wages, or other forms of relief. 7. The City may, in the exercise of its authority and performance of its functions and services, agree by contract or otherwise to participate jointly or in cooperation with Washington State, King County, or any city, town, or other incorporated place, or subdivision thereof, or engage outside counsel, to enforce this chapter. 8. The remedies and penalties provided under this chapter are cumulative and are not intended to be exclusive of any other available remedies or penalties, including existing remedies for enforcement of Tukwila Municipal Code chapters. 9. The statute of limitations for any enforcement action shall be five (5) years. Section 9. A new section is added to TMC Chapter 5.04 as follows: 1. The Finance Director may deny, suspend, or revoke any license under this chapter for violation of this ordinance. 2. The Finance Director must deny, suspend, or revoke any license under this chapter for repeated intentional violations of this ordinance. 3. Any action by the Finance Director under this section shall be subject to the procedures and requirements of TMC subsections 5.04.110.0 and 5.04.110.D and Section 5.04.112, as well as other due process rights that a court may require. -5- 227 Section 10. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings: "City" means the City of Tukwila. "Covered employer" means an employer that either (1) employs at least 15 employees regardless of where those employees are employed, or (2) has annual gross revenue over $2 million. "Effective date" is the effective date of this ordinance. "Employee" is defined as set forth in RCW 49.46.010. An employer bears the burden of proof that the individual is, as a matter of economic reality, in business for oneself rather than dependent upon the alleged employer. "Employer" is defined as set forth in RCW 49.46.010. "Employer classification" includes the determination of whether an employer is a covered employer and whether a covered employer is a large employer. "Franchise" means an agreement, express or implied, oral or written by which: 1. A person is granted the right to engage in the business of offering, selling, or distributing goods or services under a marketing plan prescribed or suggested in substantial part by the grantor or its affiliate; 2. The operation of the business is substantially associated with a trademark, service mark, trade name, advertising, or other commercial symbol; designating, owned by, or licensed by the grantor or its affiliate; and 3.The person pays, agrees to pay, or is required to pay, directly or indirectly, a franchise fee. The term, "franchise fee" is meant to be construed broadly to include any instance in which the grantor or its affiliate derives income or profit from a person who enters into a franchise agreement with the grantor. "Hour worked within the City" is to be interpreted according to its ordinary meaning, including all hours worked within the geographic boundaries of the City, excluding time spent in the City solely for the purpose of travelling through the City from a point of origin outside the City to a destination outside the City, with no employment-related or commercial stops in the City except for refueling or the employee's personal meals or errands. "Large Employer" means all employers that employ more than 500 employees, regardless of where those employees are employed, and all franchisees associated with a franchisor or a network of franchises with franchisees that employ more than 500 employees in aggregate. -6- 228 "Other covered employer" means a covered employer that does not qualify as a large employer. "Service charge" is defined as set forth in RCW 49.46.160(2)(c). "Tips" means a verifiable sum to be presented by a customer as a gift or gratuity in recognition of some service performed for the customer by the employee receiving the tip. "Wage" is defined as set forth in RCW 49.46.010. Section 11. Other Legal Requirements. This ordinance shall not be construed to preempt, limit, or otherwise affect the applicability of any other law, regulation, requirement, policy, or standard that provides for greater wages or compensation; and nothing in this ordinance shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any power or duty in conflict with federal or state law. Section 12. Rulemaking. Within 180 days after the effective date, the City shall adopt rules and procedures to implement and ensure compliance with this chapter, which shall require employers to maintain adequate records and to annually certify compliance with this chapter. The City shall seek feedback from worker organizations and covered employers before finalizing the rules and procedures. Section 13. Constitutional Subject. For constitutional purposes, this measure's subject "concerns labor standards for certain employers." See Filo Foods, LLC v. City of SeaTac, 183 Wash. 2d 770, 783, 357 P.3d 1040, 1047 (2015) (upholding this statement of subject for an initiative that set a minimum wage and addressed employees' access to hours). Section 14. Codification. All sections of this ordinance except section 9 shall be codified in a new chapter of the Tukwila Municipal Code. Section 15. Election date. In the event that the election on this measure takes place later than November 8, 2022, the Finance Department must establish and publish the initial minimum wage within 30 days of the effective date. Section 16. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, subsection, or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any employer, employee, or circumstance, is held to be invalid, it shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. -7- 229 230 Guidelines for elected and appointed officials' participation in elections activity L ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON III Elected officials and city staff should understand Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) guidelines before participating in any elections activities, including taking a position on a ballot measure or endorsing acandidate for political office. Below are some common examples of activities city officials may and may not do. It is not intended to be comprehensive. A complete listing of the PDC Guidelines for Local Government Agencies in Election Campaigns can be found on their website pdc.wa.gov. If you have any questions, please call the PDC at (360) 753-1111 or consult your jurisdiction's legal counsel. General provisions Activities that are allowed: • City employees or elected officials may, on their own time during non -work hours (and not with the use of city property or equipment), participate in campaign -related activities. • Elected officials may make statements supporting or opposing an initiative or referendum in response to a specific media inquiry. All city officials may respond to requests for factual information as part of their normal job duty. • City officials may use their title for identification purposes in endorsements supporting or opposing a candidate or an initiative or referendum, but should not use public facilities or equipment for communications and should make clear that it is their personal view. • City employees or elected officials may place on their individual agency calendar basic information if they are scheduled to be out of the office to attend campaign events. • A city may provide a facility, if it is available, for a public forum, making arrangements for all sides to be represented. • A city may allow use of a public meeting space, if it is available as normal and regular conduct, to community groups for campaign activities. If a city normally charges for the use of these facilities, then the city must charge all users equally. • City employees may wear lapel buttons at work if the city has a policy permitting employees to wear political buttons. • Private employee vehicles displaying bumper stickers may be parked on public property. • City officials may encourage staff and members of the public to vote, as long as such encouragement routinely occurs for other elections. Activities that are not allowed: • City employees or elected officials may not use public facilities, supplies, or equipment, for any campaign purpose. This includes phones, copiers, mail facilities, computers, email, websites, social media, uniforms purchased with city funds, and paper products. City officials may not reimbursethe city for usage of these facilities. City officials may not use city vehicles to transport or displaypolitical material. • City officials may not promote or oppose a candidate or ballot measure during work hours. This includes gathering signatures, distributing materials, coordinating speakers/fundraising/ phone banks, etc. It does not include elected official statements on ballot measures in response to a specific media inquiry. • City officials may not maintain individual campaign -related events on agency - wide distributed calendars. • City employees may not oppose or support an issue or candidate before a civic group on city work time. It must be on personal time. • City officials may not post signs advocating for or against candidates or ballot measures on any city property. • City employees or elected officials may not pressure city employees to participate in campaign activities for a ballot measure or candidate, take a position, or coordinate informational activities with campaign work. Association of Washington Cities 11076 Franklin St SE, Olympia, WA 98501 I wacities.org 1360.753.4137 231 A12111_110 Strong Cities Great State ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CiiiES Ballot measures Activities that are allowed: • Elected officials and city staff may speak at community forums and clubs during regular work hours to make an objective and fair presentation of the facts on a ballot measure if it is normal and regular conduct. City equipment (projector, laptop) may be used for the presentation. • Elected officials may attend an event any time during the day and give their opinion about a ballot measure, as long as they are not being compensated by the city or using any public equipment, facility or vehicle (with exceptions for specific inquiries). • City employees or elected officials may use their job title with the city in a letter to the editor (written on their own time using their own computer). They must clarify that they are expressing their own opinion, and not speaking for the city. • A city employee may respond to a political inquiry by providing routine factual information if that is part of their normal job duty. • Members of an elected council may vote to support or oppose an initiative or referendum. If your council plans to vote to take a position on an initiative or referendum, the notice of the meeting when the vote will be taken must include the title and number of the ballot proposition. Council members or the public must have an equal opportunity to express an opposing view. • Elected officials may make statements supporting or opposing an initiative or referendum in response to a specific media inquiry. All city officials may respond to requests for factual information as part of their normal job duty. • A city may use its website, newsletter, or other publications to provide citizens with information about an issue that directly impacts the city, looking at all available information. If you routinely provide objective and fair facts on a ballot measure or controversial issue, you may present objective and fair presentation of facts on the ballot propositions. • If your website or newsletter publishes resolutions or reports on council activity, you may report on action taken on a resolution. • Distribution of all information must be to "normal and regular" recipients, using the publication's regular schedule. Repeated distribution of the same information may be considered campaign activity by the PDC. Association of Washington Cities 232 • A city website may be used to inform citizens about anticipated ballot measure impacts, and allow readers to explore an issue through detailed links, if part of normal conduct and do not link to campaigns. Websites may be updated according to the city's normal procedures. • City employees may provide in-house contingency planning (what if an initiative or referendum passes). This isn't a public activity. This includes researching the impact of a ballot proposition for the purpose of gathering facts. • City employees may respond to requests for public records even if the records will be used in support or opposition of a measure, as long as the record isn't exempt from disclosure under state law. Activities that are not allowed: • City officials may not use public facilities, supplies or equipment, for any campaign purpose. This includes phones, copiers, mail facilities, computers, email, social media, websites, uniforms purchased with city funds, and paper products. City officials may not reimburse the city for usage of these facilities. City officials may not use city vehicles to transport or display political material. • City officials may not promote or oppose a candidate or ballot measure during work hours. This includes gathering signatures, distributing materials, coordinating speakers/fundraising/ phone banks, etc. It does not include elected official statements on ballot measures in response to a specific media inquiry. • City officials may not produce information that targets specific subgroups. This does not refer to mailing to groups that are on the city's regular distribution list. • City employees may not oppose or support an issue or candidate before a civic group on city work time. It must be on personal time. • City officials may not have a petition available for signature at city hall, or other city facility or vehicle. • City officials may not post signs advocating for or against candidates or ballot measures on any city property. • City employees or elected officials may not pressure city employees to participate in campaign activities for a ballot measure or candidate, take a position or coordinate informational activities with campaign work. 1076 Franklin St SE, Olympia, WA 98501 I wacities.org I 360.753.4137