HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 1104 - Amend Ord #400 on Legal Description of 43rd Place South Street Vacation 7903120677
WASHINGTON,
ORDINANCE NO. 1104
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 400 TO CORRECT
AN ERROR IN LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 400 of the City of Tukwila purported to
vacate a portion of May Street, now 43rd Place South, in the City of
Tukwila; and
WHEREAS, the legal description of the portion of 43rd Place South
being vacated contained an error, which resulted
in having an inaccurate description of the correct parcel of real property
being vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila wishes to correct this error so as
to prevent an unwarranted hardship on the property owners of said vacated
real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Ordinance No. 400, passed on June 1, 1964, is hereby amended as
follows:
The following portion of May Street, now 43rd Place South be,
and the same is hereby, vacated and the property so vacated shall revert to
the abutting property owners:
DESCRIPTION: May Street (now 43rd Place South) lying between
Blocks 2 and 3 in the plat of Riverton, replat of Lots 1 to 5,
Fostoria Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 13 of plats
on page 40, records of King County, and lying easterly of the
east line of Squire Street (now 43rd Avenue South) in the City
of Tukwila, less that portion lying southwesterly northeasterly
of a line 165 feet southwesterly measured at right angles and
parallel with the FA line survey of primary State Highway
Number 1, Foster Interchange to South 116th Street approximately
between highway engineer stations FA 50 plus 00 and FA 50 plus
50, said line being the southwesterly boundary of the proposed
right -of -way to be obtained by the State of Washington for the
construction of primary State Highway Number 1.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF T5 CITY OF TUKWIL WASHINGTON,
at a regular meeting thereof this 2 6 day of 1979.
ZIzz't'l IU' I
Mayor V
ATTEST:
C>'t Y /C1 erk
Aiproved as to F rm:
fILED for Record at equest of
N ........w.
i ty Attorney`'` c
Add re CA
M AR 1 I2 oo IN '7q
Published Record Chronicle February 23, 1979
RECORDED KC REC(1R0S
N
�L?
N
C'7
The I-ublic hearing in connection with the May Street vacation was held at this time.
Mr. Ives speaking for the Street committee stated that the freeway would take about
200 feet of this street and he could set no reason why the city should not grant
the vacation for the remaining portion. Mr. Ives moved that council approve this
vacation seconded by Mr. Anderson Y Mr. Madden appeared and petitioned
in behalf of the vacation. A discussion followed, resulting in the withdrawal of
the motion and the second. this hearing was tabled til May 4, 1964.
Mr. Bov.en read a letter from Board of County Commissioners this in rerard to the
recent request for a waiver of the Review Board, The board stated that the request
could not be granted at this time, because El the board had received a receipt of pro
from interested property owners in the vacinity of the proposed annexation.
LL. 1.;r2e issued in the month of A^r
The Public Hearing in regard to a Street vacation (May Street) was he
time. Mr. Radford reported on his findings in this concern. Mr. Radf
that council approve this vacation, except for the portion which lies
cf the fref After a brief discussion with the property owner Yr
it was moved and seconded by Mr.Bowen that council accept this vacati
motion carried.
The Public Hearing in regard to annexation of certain propert7 adac-nt 4. c t1-1
s I
Id at this
ord moved
in the path
1
on
Yy Ordinance ..k 400 regarding a street vacation was discussed with council at this
time. Mr. Minkler moved that Ordinance F 400 be placed on its first reading,second
by Mr. P.owen and carried. Mr. Ives moved that Ordinance 4" LOO be placed on its
second reading, coded by Mr. Anderson and carried. Yr. Ives rove d that Ordinar
L00 be placed on its third and final reading for passa=e, seconded by 1.r. Bowen a:
carried.
Y Ives outstioned Mr. Fod,:ze as to the fessibilty of a s”b-
;t is necessary for the city to adopt such an Ordinance for the future development,
ordinance.
ON