The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit 2109 - Wendy'sN. 1 BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT CITY OF TUKWILA NUMBER 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 l0 DATE OF ISSUANCE EXPIRES June 22, 1981 December 22, 1981 JOB ADDRESS 17275 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA LEGAL LOT NO, BLOCK TRACT DESCR. IX SEE ATTACHED SHEET OWNER PHONE Wendy's International Restaurant ADDRESS ZIP Dublin, Ohio CONTRACTOR PHONE McNeill Const. Inc. 246 -0600 A 13822 1st Ave. S., 98168 L1fl3 SST 70978 BUILDING USE Restaurant CLASS OF WORK 91 NEW ❑ADDITION ❑REMODEL 13 REPAIR ❑OTHER (Specify) BLDG. I 1st FL. I 2nd FL. I BASEMENT I GARAGE I DECK I MEZZANINE I OF STORES I TOTAL S.F. I VALUATION AREA 2645 2645 175,000 1 CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT FEE BUILDING I 400.00 THAT THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DISTRIB. PLAN RVW. I 260.00 MET, AND THAT I AM AN AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROJECT DEMOLITION A n /f il J BOND I OTHER I OWNER AGENT SIGNATURE i TOTAL 660.00 COMMENTS: TYPE CONST. I OCC. GROUP I OCC. LOAD I FIRE ZONE I USE ZONE I AUTO SPRINKLERS REG, smoke det. VN A3 10.0 CM YES NO X� yes THESE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW 1. Driveway 2. OK to 3. Roof 4. OK to 5, Wall- 6. Structure approach and pour footing sheathing enclose board complete and/ slope and /or and nailing framing nailing or OK to foundation OK OK occupy FOR INSPECTION CALL 433 -1849 BUILDIII O ICI CITY OF TUKWILA THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED CONSPICUOUSLY ON BUILDING t BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT CITY OF TUKWILA NUMBER 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 DATE OF ISSUANCE EXPIRES J ul JOB ,DRESS L� t. .saw"I lf.;C� "fbe .L`cl'I'3CItiRy, y I`tt :f�a..! F.e_ 1$% LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK DESCR. OWNER 77 �tj�I•l4iy! t r.�y 1.1't. 4Lr.l. Atli ,�1 1.�. 1. es taUri.L'1.'I. ADDRESS CONTRACTOR Al �FiFSS yy t Ave. TRACT L'IG SST NO C5; a- 70978 .:r BUILDING USE CLASS OF WORK LL SEE ATTACHED SHEET PHONE ZIP PHONE x,46- 061`x0 ZIP r.:l8 68 YBNEW ❑ADDITION OREMODEL OREPAIR 'DOTHER (Specify) BLDG, I list FL. I 2nd FL. I BASEMENT I GARAGE I DECK I MEZZANINE I OF STORES I TOTAL S,F. I VALUATION AREA I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT, BUILDING I 4uu.(it) THAT THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DISTRIB. PLAN RVW. '7601 CI MET, AND THAT' I AM AN AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROJECT. OWNER AGENT SIGNATURE COMMENTS: TOTAL TYPE CONST. I OCC. GROUP OCC. LOAD I FIRE ZONE I USE ZONE I AUTO SPRINKLERS REG. V;4 .t' Ill() OYES ONO 1� THESE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW 1, Driveway 2. OK to llQ/ r 3, Roof OK to fs. Wall- 6. Structure Q approach and pour footing C!{ sheathing enclose board complete and slope and /or and nailing framing nailing or OK to foundation OK OK occupy FOR INSPECTION CALL 433 -1849 BUILDING OFFICIAL,. CITY OF TUKWILA I THIS PERWT MUST BE POSTED CONSPICUOUSLY ON BUILDING DEMOLITION BOND OTHER I legal description June' 9v 1981 AL Piepen Citw of Tukwila In VeviVinm the above mentioned ProjeW Plansp Please note W60611owing items! Two d4chemical file Wingubhers rated NO IOUIC rating, Q resui red, to be del Ivored to the Tu"wi A re 11111 So -4�04 Pame numper reQuired her Citw,QrdipancVOjQ61, An approved:automatic .�Wrinkldr hustem m6wbe instal led jn lieu of a smoKe dejqNjidq f.;6ht6m1:CPlans must be submitted to the Fire Prevyntign.Puyeau !or A P,rov twinsiallatio ny, Insure thatydeauate electricakjyerviN (receptacles) This Will to eliminate! the future: ijle .use of extehsiowdoids, or othef ►nypproyed devipef+ Please ih6•ude these comments in wour revie4 of the Above-mpytioneo 1..17 t r i.c I T I T, .1 'hq' TOWill Fi r e Pre v entlan Bu r epy w i 4 June 1981 1 B.L.S.P.A. Architects 800 Securities Building Seattle, WA 98101 ATTENTION: Jim Paul SUBJECT: Wendy's Restaurant Building Permit Application Our office has almost completed its review of your plan set submitted on 1 June 1981. The following items must be completed in order to authorize release of your building permit: A) Analysis by the Tukwila Police Department of project parking area lighting and building security. B) Receipt of the auditor's file number for Short Subdivision 80 -45 -55 from your office. C) Acceptance of a site irrigation plan for landscaped areas as depicted on the 5 -28 -81 diagram by C. R. Naenden Company. At such time as we resolve these matters, the building permit review process, as it pertains to the Planning Department, will conclude.. TUKWILA P NING DEPARTMENT Mark Caughey. Associate Planner MC:nb 1 o z ILA 7908 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Public Works Department 433 -1850 June 12, 1981 Mr. Robert I. :Anderson, P.E. Robert I. Anderson Associates Evergreen Building 15 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Wendy's Restaurant 1� Dear Mr. Anderson: The Public Works Department has reviewed Drawing No. 1 of land approved this plan per the following comments: The developer shall be required to obtain the following permits by this department 24 hours prior to beginning construction: Sanitary Side Sewer The proposed sanitary sewer shall be provided at a minimum slope of 2%. (See sanitary sewer main extension to determine limits of side sewer.) Pipe material for lines greater than 20% shall be ductile iron pipe only and shall be sufficiently anchored as to not allow separation at the joints. All other pipe material may also be concrete or PVC (schedule 40 minimum). All pipe shall be placed in Class B bedding. Sanitary Sewer Permit Fee $170.00. (Special connection charges are waived in consideration of contribution of sewer main extension.) Sanitary Sewer Main Extension The proposed 66- linear feet of sanitary sewer crossing Southcenter Parkway shall be changed in size from 6 inches in diameter to 8 inches in diameter -and provided as a public sanitary sewer main. This main shall include a manhole structure at the west end of the line and be built per APWA and Tukwila Standard Plans. The sewer under Southcenter Parkway shall be jacked /tunnelled /augered with no street openings except those authorized by Public Works. A casing pipe shall also be provided. Any cuts into the pave- ment of Southcenter Parkway shall be backfilled with select material compacted to 95% and patched per the Standard Plan of Tukwila within 24 hours of opening the cut. The times allowed to work in Southcenter Parkway shall be determined and approved by Public Works prior to issuance of this permit. Pipe material for lines under Southcenter Parkway shall be limited to ductile iron pipe. Core drill all holes into existing manhole structure. The existing manhole shall be rechannelled per requirements of the Public Works Department. Permit Fee $25.00. For information on required documentation for turnover of this main as a public facility, please call Phillip Fraser (433 1856). Anderson s Restaurant Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk Sidewalk shall be provided per the City's Standard Plan and per Ordinance No. 1158 attached. The width of the sidewalk shall reflect Ordinance No. 1158. Curb /gutters and private drive aprons shall also be per the City of Tukwila's Standard Plans. At the south end of the sidewalk, the ground shall be brought up to the end of the sidewalk in such a manner as to provide a smooth transition and the south end of the sidewalk shall be in alignment with the existing sidewalk to the south. The curb /gutter and sidewalk shall be put in per field requirements of the inspector. The south access shall have 10 -foot radius curb returns; the north access shall have 20 -foot radius curb returns. Entrance only and exit' striping and signing shall also be included in final construction. Street Use Permit Fee $25.00. Domestic Water Meter The water service for a commercial building shall be a minimum of 1" (not 3/4" as indicated on the plan). The water meter shall be provided in the public right -of -way or in easements, preferably at the property line. The City shall install the meter and core the service to the main only. The water line under Southcenter Parkway shall be jacked /tunnelled /augered with no street openings except those authorized by Public Works. A casing pipe shall also be provided. Any cuts into the pavement of Southcenter Parkway shall be backfilled with select material compacted to 95% and patched per the Standard Plan of Tukwila within 24 hours of opening the cut. The times allowed to work in Southcenter Parkway shall be determined and approved by Public Works prior to issuance of the permit. The ~eater meter only will be put in by the City's Water Department personnel. The developer shall put in the water service line from the main to the meter from the main per requirements of Tukwila Water Department. Permit Deposit Fee $1,000 (1" meter) plus special connection fee to be determined at the time of permit application. to the construction of this water service, the developer shall ha reviewed by the Tukwila Fire Department and Insurance Underwriters the adequacy of the system to be built. Drainaqe The existing catch basin in Southcenter Parkway shall have relocated to the north end of the southerly drive return. This inlet shall be rebuilt per standard plans (APWA). All drain pipes and in the public right -of -way shall be concrete. The retention /oil /water shall be constructed per the attached sketch.* Permit Fee $25.00. Landscape Irriqation This plan, if appropriate, small be reviewed per e plan submittal. Provide six (6) sets of water irrigation plans for c Works review and approval prior to issuance of irrigation permit. Additional Comments Provide all pipe at a minimum 12" cover, unless otherwise noted. Necessary precautions shall be taken when working adjacent to Southcenter Parkway, with necessary flagmen and coning provided at the developer's expense. A high pressure gas fuel line is in the vicinity of the construction site and shall be located by the utility prior to beginning any work in the public right -of -way. All public and private utilities shall be located prior to jacked/ tunnelling /augering activities begin. 0 f r M 'r:.,. c r, c t .m.. ,,:—.0 ,....s s s....: r. r. .r :ii:. t,. ...t It ...uesh. :I ...s ,rrxw t• i.. 'Mr. Robert Anderson page 3 f. 'Re: Wendy's Restaurant June 12, If, you have any questions on this plan review, please feel free to contact me at 433 -1856. Sincerely, k Phillip R..Fraser Senior Engineer PRF/ jm cc: .Ted Uomoto Public Works Directo Al Pieper, Building Official. Alan Doerschel, Finance Director,. w h.. Tukwila Maintenance Shops Attachments *Note.: Curbs along.the south side of the parking area and north parking area which wil.1'be used to contain the storm drainage shall be constructed of'intergral concrete curb and gutter, to the, drive entrances. 4 j( 1. foundation soils investigation wendy's southcenter site 17275 southcenter parkway CASCADE -TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS SGA'1TLC 12001920 6700 Y• 14120 NE. 21.t S7PECT SILVERDALL' (2001002•C5020 OCLLCVUC. WASHINGTON 98007 (2001641.2573 EVERET7 (200) 25£1.0017 f Fchruary 26, 1981 c(rt. No. 811 -44G Balzhiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates 800 Securities Building seattle, Washington 98101 /attention: Mr. Jim Paul Reference: Foundation Soils Investigation Wendy's Southcenter Site No. 2 Vicinity 17275 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington Gentlemen: In response to your request we have performed a foundation soils investigation at the above referenced site to evaluate subsurface soil types, conditions and distributions and to present conclusions and recommendations pertinent to anticipated site development and foundation design. We understand that the project is to consist of the construction of a one (l) -story restaurant facility utilizing a wood frame and slab -on -grade design. The scope of our field work included a visual reconnaissance of the site and the excavation of four (9) backhoe test pits on February 2, 1981, at the direction and in the presence of an engineering geo- logist from this office. All references to elevations and /or relative grades used in this report are estimates based upon observed topography at the time of field work and a partial copy of the topographic survey as supplied to us by Balzhiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates. i CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 20, 1981 ti's r t tdo. 811 -44G ;,lrijiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates q r 2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION v i e site of the proposed restaurant facility is located in the vicinity of 17275 Southcenter Parkway. The property is generally rectangular, measuring approximately one hundred fifty -five (155) reet in a north -south direction and approximately two hundred fifty (250) feet in an east -west direction. Topography across the proposed building area at the time of our field work was relatively level and was estimated to be approxi- mately three (3) to four (4) feet lower in elevation than that of Southcenter Parkway. Topography increased in elevation across the :ipproxiinatc western one -third (1/3) of the property; the` elevation along the west property line was estimated to be approximately ten (10) to fifteen (15) feet higher than that of the proposed building nrc:a. 11, general, the proposed building area was covered by field grasses and marsh grasses. Marshy conditions were also indicated by vari- ,71!1y present ,hallow ponded surface water which overlaid an organic rich surface soil. Trees were located along the west property boundary. STRATIGRAPHY AND HYDROLOGY Subsurface soil types, conditions and distributions are 'best illus- trated by the accompanying test pit logs. In general, the proposed building 'a area appears to be underlain to an i undetermined depth by medium dense, dark gray to blue -gray to black, silty, very fine sand with interbedded peat, wood, peaty silt r and •,medium black sand. CASCADE TESTING LAMORATORY. INC, k TESTING 8& INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS .•Vary 26, -44 811 -4AG I N o Longwood, Smith if:�tr.hiser• g and Associates 3 ,r,,,Ilying the medium dense, silty sand was an organic horizon gener- lly composed of soft, dark brown, silty peat containing wood and Covering the organic horizon in the vicinity of test pit 2 a surficial, two (2) foot thickness of artificial fill composed loose, brown, silty sand. Organic soil and presumably uncon- •,,,lied artificial fill covered the proposed building area to the allowing depths below relative adjacent grade at the following J()vbLions: TP -1 6.5 feet TP -2 5.5 feet TP -3 4.0 feet vit. underlying, medium dense, blue -gray, very silty, very fine sand with interbedded moderate peat and wood was not encountered until ntrl� (9) feet below relative adjacent grade in the vicinity of test JI1L 4° Overlying the medium dense, silty sand at this location was a Live (5) foot thickness of medium dense, mottled orange, tan and W ny, gravelly, very silty fine sand and medium stiff, mottled VIAnge, tan and gray, gravelly, sandy silt with oxidized coatings ,11uny fractures and joints; 41WWM%jrs� pr ►>iP w think `s �r,Mjy. r .r1'9y;..�nnbr.nra,: aaxM'au•td,�.y�;:"N s��s,��.��;�yoot:h•ia�c�et��4� `�.�.��looae �;m�t;�le�! ,.t. 4y p., �md was:;'. e ..Lr 9 _.._.MW'AX`.vK 4f ui,.:, ii'! ne:. ^.►..riFsi.•ria'tr!.L'i9.,'::'• 's- ,....:.(Y.Mie'aw9t.7f11 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. 71: tlNr l� IN',F'I::CTION /CNGiN1�Ct75 /GL'UI.OGItiT'+ r ,.l,ruary ?_G, 1981 811 -44G 1 ,,,I-,hiser, Longwood, Smith, Faul and Associates 1 1 l drologically, subsurface seepage was encountered in all test pits t,ut was particularly significant within the proposed building area. Wtjile no specific water table was determined it should be clearly u nderstood that significant seepage from within the surficial or- cyanic soils was encountered. Hydrologic conditions may vary con i tiderably on a,seasonal basis. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS oused upon the results of our field investigation, office analysis and an understanding of the proposed development, the following con- clusions and recommendations are presented. it is our conclusion that the surficial organic and presumably un- controlled artificial fill soils are not suitable for the support of conventional structures. Because of the thickness of these unsuit- able soils we recommend that one (1) of two (2) approaches toward i�Lructural support be utilized. �1,1)roach No. 1: Deep Foundations The most preferred method of structural support from a soils engi- heering perspective would involve the use of an auger cast -in- place Piling foundation in conjunction with a reinforced concrete struc- tural slab. b etermination of anticipated pile lengths and loadings could be pro- vided on the basis of test boring analysis, which would require that 6 k a dditional field testing be performed. C, CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TEATING L% INSPCCTION ENGINEERS /GEOLOGIST': February 20, 1981 cert. No. 811 -44G galzhiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates 1' g e 5 Of the various deep foundation systems we would recommend only the use of auger cast -in -place piling for this project because of two (2) primary reasons: 1) Potentially detrimental effects of driven piling on both the stability of the steep slope to the west and the existing resta- urant facility to the south. 2) Subsurface hydrologic considerations. Approach No. 2: Specially Prepared Subqrade An alternative method of structural support would involve the use of a specially prepared subgrade and a traditional reinforced concrete foundation in conjunction with a nominally reinforced concrete slab on- grade. Because of subsurface hydrologic conditions, a certain degree of I risk not associated with the use of auger cast -in -place piling must be assumed by the owner if Approach No. 2 is utilized. Excavation of the surficial, organic and presumably uncontrolled fill soils could create a hydrologic imbalance whereby subsurface water could I be drained from the soils of adjacent properties at a rate that could effect existing apparent stability within these soils. Of I' particular concern would be the soils underlying the existing res- taurant facility to the south and the steep slope to the west. While the degree of risk involved in such an undertaking can not be stated conclusively, it should be emphasized that the site prepara- tion operations should be completed as rapidly as possible once they I have begun. The soils engineer should be consulted regarding the advisability of pumping excess water from the excavation if such a measure is contemplated. CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. IMI la IN'J'LCTION CN(7f14Cf:174 /GCOL.OGIF;T1, i i'cbruary 26, 1981 cert. No. 811-44G Balzhiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates i)ag e G utilization of this specially prepared subgrade would be dependent upon stripping the proposed building area of all surficial, organic and presumably uncontrolled fill soils down to the medium dense, silty sand. This stripping operation should be performed so that the future fill pad would extend a minimum distance of five (5) feet beyond the building margins as measured from the footing grade ele- vations. Subsequent to the removal of the unsuitable soils, we recommend the placement of a high density, engineered fill to underlie the founda- tion and slab -on -grade according to the following guidelines: 1) All areas to be frilled should be cleaned of all organics, rub- ble, trash or associated deleterious material. 2) All backfill material should comply with the specifications set forth in Section 9- 03.12(1) (A) Class A Gravel Backf ill for Foundations, Washington State Highway Specifications,.,,or equiva- lent approved by the soils engineer. 3) All backfill should be placed in eight (n) inch maximum loose lifts. Each lift should be spread evenly and thoroughly com- pacted prior to placement of subsequent lifts. A minimum rela- tive compaction of 95% should be achieved as established by ASTM Standard D -1557. CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS t�. No. 811 -94c Longwood, Smith, 31,.Jul and Associates All backfill material should be within 3% of optimum mois- ture content as established by the moisture density relationship (proctor) curve. ,i Any stockpiled fill soils that may be used as engineered fill should be adequately protected against saturation. in considering the aforementioned criteria, a thirty -six (36) inch minimum thickness of high density engineered fill must underlie all r.tructural footings, slabs -on- grade, concrete walkways, etc. Sub nequent to placement of the engineered fill, a conventional founda- tion and slab -on -grade may then be utilized. because of the site's subsurface hydrologic conditions, it may be necessary to stabilize the basal, undisturbed, medium dense, silty sand with a mat of well graded, high density, rock or gravel back- till subsequent to the stripping of the 'unsuitable soils and prior Lo the placement of the engineered fill. This well graded, high density rock or gravel backfill should consist of four (4) inch minus rock or gravel with l Ittle to no fines, or equivalent as 11pproved by the soils engineer. The placement of this rock or gravel backfill should extend to a relative grade just higher than that of any water table or seepage from adjacent soils at the time of earthwork operations. It is anticipated that relatively light- weight excavation equipment may be required to be used until this high density rock or gravel backfill is in place. CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS February 26, 1981 Cert. 140. 811 44G I.�,ilzhiscr, I..ongwood, Smith, Paul and Associates Page 8 Soil Design Criteria A safe, allowable soil bearing value of 2000 p.s.f. is available for a conventional foundation placed to bear upon the dense, engineered fill body, assuming compliance with the contents of this report. Potential total and differential settlements would not be expected to exceed one (1) inch. While precise footing sizes should always be determined by -the structural engineer based upon appropriate bearing values, we recom- mend that all continuous perimeter footings be a minimum of eighteen (18) inches in width and be placed a minimum of eighteen (18) inches below lowest adjacent grade for frost protection purposes. Footing soils should be surficially compacted and clean of sloughed or water loosened soils (mud) at the time of concrete placement. We strongly recommend that footing and roof drains be used as a fur- ther aid in site stabilization. All drains and other runoff should be tightlined away from the foundation soils and into the appropri- ate collector system. Parking Areas We recommend that the same general procedure of stripping unsuitable soils and replacement with engineered fill be adopted for all park- ing and roadway areas if nominal settlements in these areas are I N desired. However, concerns regarding utilization of this approach for all parking and roadway areas, in addition to the proposed N0. building area, would include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the following: CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING Ct INSPECTION /ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS rel:)rLIary 26, 19£31 Cert. No. £311 -44G Balzhiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates Page 9 1. an increased risk in creating a hydrologic imbalance as des- cribed previously, due to the significantly larger size of the excavtion. 2. the economic costs associated with such an operation. As an alternative to total removal and replacement of the unsuitable soils in parking and roadway areas, placement of a high density, engineered fill directly on top of the unsuitable soils may be con- sidered if the possibility of future settlements and. related repair costs can be tolerated. This alternative approach would involve the use of a thirty -six (36) inch minimum thickness of high density, engineered backfill,, placed according to the general guidelines and recommendations presented previously in this report. Utilization of this alternative approach would require that unusually soft or wet areas be removed prior to the placement of engineered fill. Use of a stabilizing mat of well graded, high density, rock or gravel back fill as described previously may or may not be needed based upon site conditions at the time this earthwork operation is performed. Given existing geotechnical information obtained to date, under no circumstances should toe of the existing' slope along the west ro ert boundar ber removed ant? /pr significantly modified. i- p P Y Y� g y 02- 'ga°!'nitM1nd pvn-Mha fd4`!' c n�?,,.- gr in:¢ mp11aACE ,t.�h�theecaitunendatoris= Hof "ea'i3'�'N eng °i'neer, �oui d:-�n!�:�,dverse�yw- �efEeWt� a,xisti.r�g� �a►�d.�.�.,�:u�ur- e��s�lope�"' bid may -ayen --.4 ova siope:rstabi ated:_�utr�sein� Placement of engineered fill along the west property boundary in the vicinity of the toe of the existing slope should be performed under the direct supervision of the soils engineer or his qualified representative. I TESTING LABORATORY. INC. CASCADC TESTING H INSPECTION /ENQINEERS /GEOLOGISTS February 26, 19£31 Cert. No. 811 -44G Balzhiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates Page 10 A recommended method regarding pavement support in this area can be formulated by the soils engineer at a future date based upon pro- posed finish grades and site conditions at the time this earthwork operation is performed. Special Notes Although we do expect the foundation soils types, conditions and distributions to reflect our findings, some variations may occur. Should conditions or occurrences other than those discussed in our report be encountered, we suggest that the soils engineer be con- tacted to determine if additional or alternative recommendations are required. We recommend that the soils engineer or his qualified representative inspect excavation work to ensure that penettat•ion down to the desired bearing stratum and that proper conditioning of the subbase have been achieved prior to the placement of rock or gravel back- fill, engineered fill or concrete. Should certification of any engineered fills be desired or required, a program of. continuous inspection and testing must be initiated prior to the placement of any engineered fill. �.bruary 26, 1981 No. 811 -44G i,,l,.hiser, Longwood, Smith,' Paul and Associates j'��qc 11 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of.Balzhiser, ;,ongwood, Smith, Paul and Associates for specific application re r virding the proposed Wendy's restaurant at the aforementioned site, iccordance with generally accepted foundation and soils engineer .;l practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is given. 1 you for this opportunity to be of service. We trust our find Ings, conclusions and recommendations will be helpful in the suc- cessful completion of your project." Should you have any questions or require further assistance on this or another matter, please feel free to contact us. test pit locaiton map x test pit logs i t 7 H Sgil I)c;rIipIiolI nncl Clar.;il if. tinn Ar1X, Lr4 A \0 1-:.;r TO \J r. r, l 7 A \ED I LJA\ DE./.ISE, DA21- G f To K"�Cv VEe•'! 51L Ty ve zY Floe SAnIC \JIV I (JTE Et E DDED toFr Tb A\E(:X L)X\ 5TI FF LAee• aP PEATY t51 L 7 PEAT A,JD WOOD A \O IST T) \\/£T Il Notes: t r 3 Soil Doscription and Classification 5DF`r DAe1G 8e .O\J�A 51 L;N PEAT, W 1 T N ABUW: 17 WOOD ANA W441 A.\01aT "To \JE A \sO I UM DE►.lsE, try- 4y2AY Td BL._AG S►c..TY, F111E 5A1.10 W1T!'1 1t.1T621i3EDDEC� A \ODE2•AT6 PEAT AND WOO A\01'ST "ra 10•- T p TEST PIT LOG Cascade Testing Laboratory, Inc. Engineers Geologists 141 20 N. E. 21st Street Bellevue, Wash. 98007 Phone 641 -2573 1.1 E Soil Doscrip"O" and Clrlslilicatloll („OD!.tr 8�.0\Jcl JI L_T( SAtJt� h \01:1" •L' \JET (FIL -L?). SoFr, D A%6DIUI.\ 6 1 CaCAY N.ln TW. 71- *1V('l' 51 LT 1JET. /1\L5DIV/.\ T>1.16E' 1 bAeV.6qeAY T 5LA4:Y StL.W, VE2 FOIE 64)Ab WrN toTre'Ibr-wev AW102 TO &OIZZOAT1 FEAT, \vbOD, A FIn1E TO A \5CWK\ al PCk 5AI 1D, A\AlS'r To \J G;T T.D.= Ii' Notes: A M RA.Pkt T, P. •4{ Soil Description and Classification 0— l LAO°aE, A\m zc> oeAK1& iw A4D e- COA`(, 6 VEOz 61Ll 6AnlZ�: ASOLUN\ DEl\ISE, A\O'TTL.ED o eALJa G T4j PNO 610AY, 4¢A.JEL LY,vEW sIL:rY FiPxr 6AsID A&ID AIE,DluA\ 5'r lFP, MOTTLE De!),► -1C� ,TAhI ARID 412AY. G(P�.VELL..�( �.1oY 51t,T, oX tD1ZED CG1D -T\ t�1C -ts ALC*4(j FPACTU¢ES AtJD 3OU.17S A. I -10 J StC. VEe.Y �1�.1E 5AlJD \J 1T11 Itil�('�eeEDpED A\aDE2A'\� �T• I m AND WLa�D J\\�15T 'fd \JET 0; i -ro.' 1 4 Notes: DATEz- -;L-6t CERT. NO, 61\ -44e.� DWN BY P44e CHKD BY J'(5 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TS SE CTING !k INL-! CTION ENGING 5 rC0 ER /G1- OGIS6 T LIIYU Ul_LLL'VUG. WASHINGTON MJ007 12041 G4 I.257J ['el)ruary 26, 1981 811 -44G '.I A111.1 1:•u1.1 .1.701. b1LV1.14UAL1_ 12U41 1d12 CVERETT (20G) 2E�0•0017 3alzhiser, Longwood, Smith, Paul and Associates 300 Securities Building ;eattle, Washington 98101 Nttention: Mr. Jim Paul Ieference: Wendy's South Center Site No. 2 Vic'inity 17275 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington M 3entlemen: In response to your request, this letter is presented to address the issue of placing engineered fill against and upon the toe of the axisting slope along the proposed west property boundary of the above referenced site. It is our understanding that proposed pro ?erty dimensions are to measure approximately one hundred fifty -five (155) feet in a north -south direction and approximately two hundred Fifty (250) feet in a east -west direction. Based upon a partial :opy of the topographic survey supplied to us, elevations of between 30.0 and 35.0 are expected along the proposed west property bound- ary. It is our additional understanding that the western portion of the site (west of elevation 22.0) is to be used primarily as a park ing area and that no structures are planned for this area. Based upon our field work performed to date, office analysis, and experience in these matters, it is our opinion that placement of engineered fill against and upon the toe of the existing slope, as described herein, and in compliance with the recommendations con- tained in our forthcoming foundation soils investigation report, should not adversely effect existing apparent and future slope stability, and may even improve slope stability due to its antici- pated buttressing effect. purpose and contents ot• this letter. will be incorporated into our. forthcoming foundation soils investigation report. which will be completed in the near future. This letter is intended to supple mentr not supersede the forthcoming report. We strongly recommend t11c -,t the forthcoming report be• reviewed by all appropriate parties prior to the commencement of any earthwork operations at the site. Thank you for this opportunity to.be of service, should you have any questions please feel free to contact us., C LM 10 Rol =70 TM= .BM 60 J =N THE PROPOSED :LrrGHTING FOR THE PARKING AREA IS T.NADEQUAM. ADDITIONAL LIGHTING SHOULD BE INSTALLED A5 INDICATED BY THE RED CIRCLES' tIN THE PLAT MAP' THESE .ARE.IAl ADD I T I ON TO THE TWO PROPOSED LIGHTS A T THE WEST CORNERS OF T PROPERTY. BOTH THE ENTTRANCE EXIT' SIGNS SHOULD BE E 1. HER INTERNALLY— ��E7 EXTERNALLY RNALL Y FLU>~lli�lATEDu PREFERABLY. I.NTER.NAL:L.YA EXTERIS)R LIGHTING or THE, EUIL.DING APPEARS BUFF x C ENT ALTHOUGH THE WAT:I 'AGE OF THE BULBS IS. SO!"lE WHAT L �y .APPEAR TO:. BE OF SUFF" I C a ENT'. DUAL I T'Y HOWEVER IT 7S DIFFICULT 71. DE'TER!`,INE IF THE, LOC1. APPARATUS' 1.6 F'UL:LY CAPABLE ,OF, SEC THE DOORS, THE SHRUBBERY IN THE FRONT, O THE:. PROPERTY, APPEARS TO BE O F ADEQUATE HE IGHTH .SO AS NOT TO OBS CURE CURE THE V ISION OF PERSONS EXITING. THIS HOWEVER, IS 'CONTINGENT Ur'''f:N .`{HE. TYPE QF' SHRUE?B1 =RY.' ''.SE.Il\lG PLANTED BETWEEN THE ENTRANCE= AND EXIT DRIVEWAYS. TH E LANDSCAPING BLUEPRINT INDICATE THAT DoGWt: CID TREES ARE PROPOSED.— j 80' 'THE FOL.LAGE SHOULD BE' AT LEAST, TEN FE[-',T Ifni,' HE IGHT".-I. THIS. WIC:t:'.. ALLOW 'ADEQUATE VISUAL.: CLEARENIM"' r x BUILDING DEPARTMENT r CITY of TUKWI LA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 433 -1849 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT DATE �IPERMIT NO. WHEN VALIDATED JOB ADDRES 17V75" LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT DESCR. I YES NO (N YES [D NO APPROVED FEE BUILDING I q00 O O OWNER PLAN RVW, I V-6 b 0 D ADDRESS CONTRACTOR X. ADDRESS LICENSE NO 0/ /(/j L C' C� C? S ST NO RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA J ui I 11981 StfiLMNO DEPT, EXPIRES V SEE ATTACHED SHEET (PHONE IZIP PHONE C ob ZIP 6'r C3`7Fr X BUILDING USE ��u� TENANT' roc- I I CI-4S OF WORK NEW ADDITION REMODEL REPAIR OTHER (Specify) BLDG. 1st FL. I 2nd FL. I BASEMENT I GARAGE I DECK. I MEZZANINE I n OF STORES TOTAL S•F. VALUATION AREA I I I I rl NAME OF APPLICANT (PLEASE PRINT) /fXl i �';J�+�l��/!� ADDRESS �,jj s' L. 713 /�v%I�� I PHONE I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY ME IS TRUE ANAORRE T AND T TH APP ICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET. SIGNATUREC�F APPLICANT v DO NOT WRITE B�0 THIS LINE I TYYPE� C /t/ PLAN PLANS: RVW. FIRE DEPT. PLANNING/ SEPA PUBLIC WKS. DEMOLITION BOND OTHER TOTAL 1D 6 0 0 d COMMENTS: OCC. GROUP It 0 SENT OCC. LOAD I 160 RETURNED RECEIPT NO. I APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY: jf 0 SMBKF FIRE ZONE USE ZONE AUTO SPRINKLERS REG. I DETECTOR C /fl I YES NO (N YES [D NO APPROVED FEE BUILDING I q00 O O DISTRIB. PLAN RVW, I V-6 b 0 D RECEIPT NO. I APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY: jf 0 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x