Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-09-21 Regular MinutesL.I.D. 5 Southwick, Campbell Waterman Re: Hulin& Ehrlichman L.I.D. 5 If Re: Record Chronicle Southwick, Campbell Waterman L.I.D. 6 Re: Hullin Ehrlichman L.I.D. 8 Mc Lean Company Re: Hullin, Ehrlichman ATTEST: X V G ,A:/ 4 I BALK, CITY CLERK September 21, 1964 The regular meeting of the Tukwila City Council was called to order by the Mayor, John B. Strander at 8:00 P.M. Council men present were Stan Minkler, E.W. Ives, Richard A. Bowen, Dwight R. Gardner, C.T. Baker and Robert B. Anderson. First order of business was the reading of the minutes of the September 8th meeting, the minutes were approved as read. Mr. Minkler moved that all bills approved by the finance committee be allowed and warrants drawn for their respective amounts, seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. They are as follows: PAYROLL FUND WARRANT 293 305 $2,513.53 CURRENT EXPENSE If 8577 8587 832.04 STREET EXPENSE 6511 6512 564.76 WATER EXPENSE 6114 6116 465.54 SEWER EXPENSE 400.00 15.32 107.00 100.00 Tie Treasurer's report was presented to council at this time. Mayor Strander present resolution No. 176 this in regard to the revision of the limited access highway Mr. Ives moved that council approve this resolution, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried. The public hearing relating to L.I.D. 5 was opened for discission at this time, with council acting as a board of adjustment. Mr. Hodge, the attorney outlined the duties and responsibilities of this board of adjustment. Mayor Strander gave a detailed account of why the City felt that this was the time to enter into this sewer project. No. 1. Being that a new school in the area made it necessary. No. 2. the growth of the City No. 3 That if the city waited, the cest would be greatly increased as the freeway crossing would involve a greater problem, that being the freeway would have to tunneled under at a greater cost to all those included in the L.I.D. Mayor Strander also stated that the monthly sewer rate/ or charge was raised from $4.00 to $4.50 the need for this was because of 3 sections originally figured in the L.I.D. were deleted. Following are the protest, which will refer to the meeting of September 21 and 22, with the excepti ©n of a few, to which further consideration was given, this being resolved at a meeting on September 30, 1964 MAYOR, JOHN B. STRANDER 1. Frank Todd: Action: Action: Action: Action: Action: 6. Macri: Action: Action: g. McCanky: Action: a. Protest b. deletion This 2. A. Cadiga: Protest on Assessment 3. Carl Brewer: Protest on Assessment 4.Willard Westergard: 7. O'Rourke: deletion of lot 24 from assessment roll of lot 13 block 1 from assessment roll part a. rejection of protest part b. approved and assessment will be deleted from the roll, this property to be assessed subject to building at a later date. Action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Ives carried. rejection of protest, Mr. Anderson suggested that the developer extension might be used for further development of the property, as only 190 foot depth of property has been assessed. This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried. protest rejected due to the fact that the Brewer property is being assessed along Interurban Avenue only. It is the Cities responsibility to serve the Brewer property at the convenience of Mr. Brewer. The three parcels of land are in the names of Carl Richard Brewer and Mr. Malone. This action was moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. Protest placing on SS and the monthly sewer charge 5. L.E. Crestick: rejection of protest This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. Protest on Assessment Protest Assessment Mr. Anderson moved that further consideration be given, seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. Final action to come at the meeting of September 30, 1964 rejection of protest This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried. Mr. Bergstrom requested that the Anderson statement be made a part of the minutes. In affect that the assessments were based on the zone termi method. Mr. Baker stated that althe at this time, he felt it might be impratical, that there is a great potential for the future in this area. Protest on assessment of 20 feet. Mir. Radford moved that this be continued and a title search be ordered, seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. This to continued til September 30, 1964 Protest Assessment Tax lot 14 rejection of protest This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried the vote in this instance was: Anderson, Bowen, Baker Gardner Minkler in favor and Mr. Radford and Mr. Ives against this action 9. Lee R. Phillips: Protest on tax lot 19 Action: 10. Lee R. Phillips: Action: 11. A. Dowsing: Action: 12. Leon Cooke: Action: Protest on tax lot 17- disputed ownership Protest assessments on three lots that cannot be served Protest placing of stub 13. Donald P. Leahy: Protest the removal of 3 survey stakes Action: This will be turned over to the contractor. with the replacement of said stakes. 14. Carl Bergstrom: Protest Assessment Action: Mr. Ives moved that the attorney and the engineer check Ordinance No. 382 section 4 specifically the special benefit clause. Final action to be taken at the meeting of September 30, 1964 15. Mc Carthy: Action: rejection of protest This action moved by Mr. Anderson,seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. A title search has been ordered, with the legal owner being billed for the assessment This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. This will be deleted from the assessment roll, Mr. Anderson stated that a special sewer charge will apply at such time these above mentioned lots are developed. This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried. rejection of protest, as this stub will be changed. This action moved. by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried. Mr. Bergstrom, in protesting the assessment drew a diagram on the board from which he showed his reasons of discontent with the present assessment, Mr. Bergstrom stated that his property was assessed by the zone and terms method, where in his case the special benefit clause should have been considered. Protest sewer line does not serve all 3 parcels of their property A letter will be sent, stating the obligation of the City to extend the sewer line at the con vience of Mr. Mc Carthy This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried. 16. McAbee: Action: Action: Action: Protest excessive assessment also being cahrged for 2 side sewers 17. A. Merkle: 18. A. Merkle: 19. B. Lutes: Pretest side sewer (not requested) Protest removal of survey stakes Action: This will be turned over to the contractor, with the replacement of survey stakes Protest Assessment rejection of protest on excessive assessment, deletion of cost of second side sewer This action moved by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Ives and carried. deletion of cost of side sewer not requested This action moved and seconded By Mr. Anderson and Mr. Ives motion carried. This will be continued for further consideration Final action to be taken at the meeting of September 30, 1964