Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL15-0013 - JOHN FORD - SABEY CORPORATION TYPE 3 WIRELESS FACILITYWIRELESS FACILITY TYPE 3 Parent Project: PL15-0013 APPROVED This File: L15-0016 -\ ter, City of Tukwila Jinn Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director May 28, 2015 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Sandra Suskic, Project Manager, Sabey Corporation John Ford, Vice President, Sabey Data Center Properties King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L15-0016 Applicant: Sabey Corporation Type of Permit Applied for: Type Ill Wireless Communication Facility Project Description: Approval of a Type III Wireless Communication Facility. The proposal is to install an 8.1 meter (33.5 foot) antenna at the Intergate West Campus Building C. The proposed antenna will be located in a fenced secured antenna yard, hidden from view when traveling on Tukwila International Boulevard. Location: 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard on the westerly side of property, adjacent to Building C. Parcel Number 0923049309. Associated Files: N/A Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (25)(A)(ii). Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Hearing Examiner has determined that the application for a Type III Wireless Communication Facility does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Application is a Type 3 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of the Decision is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the Hearing Examiner's decision may file an appeal in King County Superior Court. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner's Decision must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Valerie Lonneman, who may be contacted at 206-433-7140 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Diartment of Community Development City of Tukwila VL Page 2 of 2 May 28, 2015 W:\Users\Valerie\Notice of Decisional 15-0016 NOD Type 3 WCF 4 TUKWILA HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Applicant: File Number: Application: Owner: Location: SEPA Determination: Comprehensive Plan/ Zoning Designation: Recommendation: Public Hearing: Exhibits: Sabey Corporation by Sandra Suskic L15-0016 The request is for approval of a Type 3 Wireless Communication Facility, consisting of an 8.1 meter antenna. Sabey Corporation 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard, adjacent to Building C. Exempt from SEPA determination Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI) Department of Community Development recommends approval. The Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the application on May 21, 2015 at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA. The following exhibits were entered into the record: 1. Department's staff report with Attachments A-D Attachment A: Attachment B: Attachment C: Attachment D: Vicinity map Graphic simulations of the proposed tower Plan set Satellite Dish Digital Fortress — noise analysis Introduction The applicant, Sabey Corporation, seeks approval of a Type 3 Wireless Communication Facility. A hearing was held on May 21, 2015, at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. Represented at the hearing were: the Department, by Valerie Lonneman, Assistant Planner, and Minnie Dhaliwal, Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey Corporation Wireless Application Page 2 of 6 Senior Planner; and the applicant, Sabey Corporation, by Sandra Suskic, project architect, and representatives of Hughes Network and Digital Fortress. All references to TMC or Code refer to the Tukwila Municipal Code. After due consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, the following shall constitute the findings of fact, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner on this application. Findings of Fact 1. The site is located addressed as 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard, and is on the surface parking area for an existing office park campus, the Intergate West Campus. The site is served by Tukwila International Boulevard which is located north of the site. The property is located on the western border of Tukwila, adjacent to Burien; a wooded buffer area separates the site from an apartment complex. 2. The property is zoned Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI). 3. The applicant proposes installation of an 8.1-meter tall antenna in the parking area adjacent to building C at the Intergate West Campus. The proposed antenna would be ground -mounted, and is depicted in the simulations shown in Attachment B to the staff report. 4. The proposed antenna is one of 17 new "gateway" locations for antennas that will support the new "EchoStar 19/Jupiter II satellite. The gateways must be separated from each other by at least 350-400 miles, and located in areas of limited precipitation. The antenna must also be within 115 meters of the supporting indoor equipment, and must have a "free and clear look" angle of 147 degrees. 5. The Digital Fortress (DF) facility in Building C currently supports a gateway from Spaceway Satellite, consisting of two 3.5-meter antennas and eight racks of indoor baseband equipment. The EchoStar/Jupiter II satellite requires an antenna in an area close to the existing DF facility, and the applicant would utilize DF support services and infrastructure for the proposed antenna. 6. The Department has reviewed the application and recommends approval. 7. No public comments were submitted to the Department or the Hearing Examiner on this application. 8. TMC 18.58.050.0 sets out the following order of preference for location of new wireless communication facilities: 1. Place antennas on existing structures, such as buildings, towers, water towers, or electrical transmission towers. Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey CorporationWireless Application Page 3 of 6 2. Place wireless communication facilities in nonresidentially-zoned districts and nonresidential property. 3. Place antennas and towers on public property and on appropriate rights -of -way if practical, provided that no obligation is created herein for the City to allow the use of City property or public right-of-way for this purpose. 4. City Property/Public Rights -of -Way. The placement of personal wireless communication facilities on City -owned property and public rights -of -way will be subject to other applicable sections of the Tukwila Municipal Code and review by other departments (i.e., Public Works, Parks and Recreation, etc.). 9. TMC 18.58.060 provides that: A. New towers are not permitted within the City unless the Hearing Examiner finds that the applicant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that: 1. Coverage objective —There exists an actual (not theoretical) significant gap in service, and the proposed wireless communication facility will eliminate such significant gap in service; and 2. Alternates — No existing tower or structure, or other feasible site or other alternative technologies not requiring a new tower in the City, can accommodate the applicant's proposed wireless communication facility; and 3. Least intrusive: The proposed new wireless communication facility is designed and located to remove the significant gap in service in a manner that is, in consideration of the values, objectives and regulations set forth in this chapter, TMC Title 18, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the least intrusive upon the surrounding area. B. The Hearing Examiner shall be the reviewing body on the application to construct a new tower, and shall determine whether or not each of the above requirements are met. Examples of evidence demonstrating the foregoing requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. That the tower height is the minimum necessary in order to achieve the coverage objective; 2. That no existing towers or structures or alternative sites are located within the geographic area required to meet the applicant 's engineering requirements to meet its coverage objective (regardless of the geographical boundaries of the City); 3. That existing towers or structures are not of a sufficient height or could not feasibly be extended to a sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering requirements to meet its coverage objective; / Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey Corporation Wireless Application Page 4 of 6 4 That existing structures or towers do not have sufficient structural strength to support the applicant's proposed antenna and ancillary facilities; 5, That the applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna; b. That the fees, costs or contractual provisions required by the owner or operator in order to share an existing tower or structure, or to locate at an alternative site, or to adapt an existing tower or structure or alternative site for sharing, are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower construction by 25% are presumed to be unreasonable; 7. That an alternative technology that does not require the use of a new tower, such as a cable microcell network using multiple low powered transmitters/receivers attached to a wireline system, is unsuitable. Costs of alternative technology that exceed new tower or antenna development shall not be presumed to render the technology unsuitable; and 8_ The applicant demonstrates other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures or other sites or alternative technologies unsuitable. All engineering and technological evidence must be provided and certified by a registered and qualified professional engineer and clearly demonstrate the evidence required. C. The Hearing Examiner, after holding a public hearing, shall either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, or remand the application back to staff for further investigation in a manner consistent with the Hearing Examiner order. Conclusions 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this application pursuant to Chapter 18.58 TMC. Under the Code, an application for a new wireless communication facility tower requires a Type 3 permit, with approval by the Hearing Examiner. 2. The May 1, 2015 DCD staff report is adopted by reference herein. 3. The proposed new freestanding antenna is consistent with the order of preference in TMC 18.58.050.C. There are no existing structures that would be within 377 feet of interior equipment and in full view of a geosynchronous domestic satellite. The site is located in the CL/I zone, a non-residential district. Placement of the antenna on public property or a public right-of-way would not be possible, given the project's need to have specialized supportive services in close proximity and a specific view angle of a geosynchronous domestic satellite. The site is not designated as landmark or historic district. 1 Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey CorporationWireless Application Page 5 of 6 4. New wireless towers must also meet the criteria of TMC 18.58.060.A. TMC 18.58.060.B lists examples of evidence that show that the criteria of subsection A are met. 5. The proposal would meet TMC 18.58.060.A.1, since there is an actual and significant gap in service, which would be eliminated by the proposed antenna. Furthermore, the antenna height of 8.1 meters (33.5 feet) and overall size are the minimum necessary in order to achieve the coverage objective, i.e., the amount of bandwidth to be supported by this gateway. 6. TMC 18.58.060.A.2 is met. The EchoStar 19/Jupiter II satellite which is to be served by the antenna requires individual antennas that will point uniquely to the satellite, a requirement that constrains the location of the antenna. The need for supportive services and indoor equipment within 115 meters of the antenna further restricts the location of the proposal. There are no existing towers or structures that could meet the engineering requirements of the applicant's coverage objective. The antenna cannot be placed on the rooftop of the building near the identified site, as the size and structural weight bearing limits for the rooftop cannot be met. Co -location is not feasible in light of the engineering requirements, and there is no alternative technology that would avoid the need for a satellite antenna. Although the proposed antenna was not shown to cause interference with antenna on other existing towers or structures, or vice versa, the engineering requirements for the coverage objective do not allow the use of existing towers or structures. 7. TMC 18.58.060.A3 is also met. The proposed antenna would be the least intrusive upon the surrounding area. The antenna would be located in a private parking area serving adjacent commercial development, with limited visibility from roads or the surrounding residential areas. The proposed height is below the height limit in the zone, and proposal complies with design standards for wireless communication facilities. 8. The proposal would meet the general requirements of TMC 18.58.070 and TMC 18.58.130, and would be consistent with adopted City plans and regulations. 9. The application would meet all applicable criteria for a Type 3 new wireless communication facility tower, and should be approved. Decision The application for a Type 3 Wireless Communication Facility is hereby approved. Entered this 28`h day of May, 2015. Anne Watanabe Hearing Examiner Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey Corporation Wireless Application Page 6 of 6 Informational Items: 1. A City of Tukwila building permit is required for the proposed tower. An electrical permit is required for any electrical work. 2. TMC 18.58.180 provides: Expiration. Any application to install or operate a wireless communications facility shall expire exactly one year from the date of issuance of the application unless significant progress has been made to construct the facility. The City may extend the expiration period by up to one additional year due to circumstances outside of the control of the applicant. However, the City shall not issue an extension if any revisions have occurred to the City's Zoning Code which would affect the wireless communication facility approved application. Concerning Further Review TMC 18.108.030.0 provides that "The decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be final and shall be appealable only to Superior Court pursuant to RCW 36.70C." BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that on this date I sent true and correct copies of the attached Findings and Decision to each person listed below, or on the attached mailing list, in the matter of Sabey Corporation, Hearing Examiner file: L15- 0016 in the manner indicated. Party Method of Service Valerie Lonneman /1 U.S. First Class Mail, postage prepaid Department of Community Development ❑ Inter -office Mail 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, #100 /1 E-mail Tukwila, WA 98188 ❑ Fax Valerie.Lonneman@Tukwila@WA.gov ❑ Hand Delivery ❑ Legal Messenger Minnie Dhaliwal Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov Dated: May 28, 2015 Tiffany Ku Legal Assistant r� NOTIFICATION: City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER May 1, 2015 Notice of application and Notice of Hearing was mailed to the surrounding property owners/tenants and posted on site on April 15, 2015. No public comments were received. FILE NUMBER: L15-0016 APPLICANT: Sandra Suskic, Sabey Corporation PROPERTY OWNER: Sabey Corporation REQUEST: Approval of a Type III Wireless Communication Facility. The proposal is to install an 8.1 meter (33.5 foot) antenna at the Intergate West Campus Building C. The proposed antenna will be located in a fenced secured antenna yard, hidden from view when traveling on Tukwila International Boulevard. LOCATION: 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard on the westerly side of property, adjacent to Building C. Parcel Number 0923049309. ASSOCIATED PERMITS: Building permit and electrical permits issued through the City of Tukwila are required. SEPA DETERMINATION: Exempt from SEPA determination per WAC 197-11-800 (25)(A)(ii) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI) ZONE DESIGNATION: Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI) STAFF: Valerie Lonneman, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: A: Vicinity map B Graphic simulations of the proposed tower C: Plan set D: Satellite Dish Digital Fortress —Property Line Noise Analysis 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 FINDINGS Vicinity/Site Information Project Description The applicant is requesting approval of a Type III Wireless Communication Facilities [WCF] Permit to install an 8.1 meter (33.5 foot) antenna at the Intergate West Campus Building C. The proposed antenna will be located in a fenced secured antenna yard, hidden from view when traveling on Tukwila International Boulevard. The antenna will be ground mounted on cast in place reinforced concrete foundations. A modular block retaining wall will be constructed to support the cut into the adjacent slope. Refer to plan set (Attachment C). Existing Development The proposed location is Sabey Corporation's Intergate West Campus, behind Building C. The property is zoned Commercial Light Industrial. Surrounding Land Uses The site lies on the western border of Tukwila, adjacent to Burien, adjacent to a wooded buffer area behind the Woodridge Park Apartment complex (see Attachment A). The remaining properties adjacent to the proposed antenna are located within Tukwila and include: the Sabey Intergate West Campus Building B to the south, which is zoned Commercial Light Industrial; International Gateway East LLC to the east, which is zoned Manufacturing/Industrial Center — Heavy; and right-of-way along Tukwila International Boulevard to the north. Background In 2006, the City adopted a Wireless Facilities Chapter (TMC 18.71) to the Zoning Code. The chapter provides specific location and design requirements for the placement of Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) within the City of Tukwila. A wireless communication facility is defined under TMC 18.06..936 as "any tower, antenna, ancillary structure or facility, or related equipment or component thereof, which is used for the transmission of radio frequency signals through electromagnetic energy for the purpose of providing phone, internet, video, information services, specialized mobile radio, enhanced specialized mobile radio, paging, wireless digital data transmission, broadband, unlicensed spectrum services utilizing part 15 devices, and other similar services that currently exist or that may in the future be developed". The proposed facility meets the definition of a wireless communication facility as it provides broadband service and coverage. Location Selection Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) provides a hierarchy of appropriate locations within the City. Generally, co - locations and utilizing existing structures are favored over the development of new standalone WCF within the City. TMC 18.58.050 TABLE A Type of Permit Required, Based on Type of Wireless Communication Facility ZONING (1) TYPE OF FACILITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Transmission Tower co -location Type 1 Type 1 Type 1 Adding antennas to an existing tower Type 1(2) Type 1(2) Type 1(2) Utility pole co -location Type 2 Type 2 Type 2 Page 2 of 12 Concealed building attached Type 2(3) Type 2(3) Type 2(3) Non -concealed building attached Type 2 Type 2 Type 1 New tower or waiver request Type 3(4) Type 3(4) Type 3(4) (1) Zoning for any private/public property or right-of-way Residential — LDR', MDR, or HDR Commercial — O, MUO, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC, C/LI or TVS Industrial - LI, HI, MIC/L, or MIC/H (2) Provided the height of the tower does not increase and the square footage of the enclosure area does not increase. (3) An applicant may request to install a non -concealed building attached facility, under TMC Section 18.58.150. (4) In the event of uncertainty on the type of a wireless facility, the DCD Director shall have the authority to determine how a proposed facility is incorporated into Table A. The applicant is proposing a new freestanding WCF and therefore is subject to Type 3 approval by the Hearing Examiner. Review Criteria TMC 18.58.050 Types of Permits —Priority --Restrictions. C. The City's preferences for locating new wireless communications facilities are as, follows: 1. Place antennas on existing structures, such as buildings, towers, water towers, or electrical transmission towers. The antenna needs to be located within 377 feet of interior equipment and in full view of a geosynchronous domestic satellite. These two parameters were the primary driver for the exact antenna position. 2. Place wireless communication facilities in nonresidentially-zoned districts and nonresidential property. The proposed location is on private property owned by Sabey Corporation, zoned Commercial Light Industrial, which is a nonresidential district. 3. Place antennas and towers on public property and on appropriate rights -of -way if practical, provided that no obligation is created herein for the City to allow the use of City property or public right-of-way for this purpose. The proposed location is on private property due to logistical purposes referenced above (C.1.). The proposed location provides adequate screening such that the antenna will not be visible from Tukwila International Blvd. 4. City Property/Public Rights -of -Way. The placement of personal wireless communication facilities on City owned property and public rights -of -way will be subject to other applicable sections of the Tukwila Municipal Code and review by other departments (i.e., Public Works, Parks and Recreation, etc_). There is no opportunity to place the antennas on City property or City right-of-way that would meet the applicant's coverage objectives. 5. Wireless communication facilities shall not be permitted on property designated as landmark or as part of a historic district. The proposed location is not on property designated as landmark or historic district. Page 3 of 12 TMC 18.58.060 New Towers. A. New towers are not permitted within the City unless the Hearing Examiner finds that the applicant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that: 1. Coverage objective —There exists an actual (not theoretical) significant gap in service, and the proposed wireless communication facility will eliminate such significant gap in service; and The Digital Fortress (DF) facility currently supports a gateway from Spaceway Satellite, which consists of two (2) 3.5M antennas and eight (8) racks of indoor baseband equipment. DF has provided a host site for this equipment for the past five years, with the gateway agreement recently renewed until December 31, 2020. This site was chosen based in part on the fact that it is currently a Spaceway site, has the necessary mission critical infrastructure in place (i.e. UPS, generators, 24x7 operations, and multiple fiber providers), and is located in a region of the country which, along with the other 16 gateway sites, provides good availability and does not interfere with user traffic on the satellite. 2. Alternates — No existing tower or structure, or other feasible site or other alternative technologies not requiring a new tower in the City, can accommodate the applicant's proposed wireless communication facility; and The existing two (2) 3.5M antennas currently at this site support a separate stand-alone satellite (Spaceway) and are not able to be used in conjunction with the new EchoStar 19/Jupiter II satellite, thus presenting the need for the additional antenna. Each satellite requires antennas that point uniquely to that satellite. The 17 new gateway locations must be separated from each other by at least 350-400 miles and must all be in the western half of the US and Canada. These constraints force the proposed site to be in western Washington State. The antenna cannot be placed on the roof due to the size and the structural weight bearing limitations of Digital Fortress Building C. 3. Least intrusive: The proposed new wireless communication facility is designed and located to remove the significant gap in service in a manner that is, in consideration of the values, objectives and regulations set forth in this chapter, TMC Title 18, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the least intrusive upon the surrounding area. The Jupiter II satellite has antennas that point to a very specific area at or very close to the DF facility. Since there is already infrastructure and manpower in place at DF, it is the best location for the Seattle site. With the support of DF and the Landlord, the applicant believes that the antenna is being located in the least intrusive area on the site. It will be in a private parking lot with limited visibility from roads and the surrounding residential area. The proposed location of the antenna allows Sabey to have a free and clear look angle of 147 degrees and meets the requirements of being within 115 meters (377 feet) of the indoor equipment. B. The Hearing Examiner shall be the reviewing body on the application to construct a new tower, and shall determine whether or not each of the above requirements are met. Examples of evidence demonstrating the foregoing requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. That the tower height is the minimum necessary in order to achieve the coverage objective; The antenna size chosen for this site is larger than the antenna used for the Spaceway primarily because the amount of traffic to be produced will be more than 20 times higher than that provided by the Spaceway site. The size of an earth station antenna is chosen based on the amount of bandwidth supported by the gateway. The Jupiter II antenna has been sized accordingly. The dish -type antenna design is the only viable technology to Page 4 of 12 deliver the required performance. The antenna is mounted to a pedestal at a height just sufficient to allow clearance to the ground during its installation. In normal operation, the antenna will be pointing up at an angle of about 30 degrees. 2. That no existing towers or structures or alternative sites are located within the geographic area required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements to meet its coverage objective (regardless of the geographical boundaries of the City); The existing two (2) 3.5M antennas currently at this site support a separate stand-alone satellite (Spaceway) and are not able to be used in conjunction with the new EchoStar 19/Jupiter II satellite, thus presenting the need for the additional antenna. Each satellite requires antennas that point uniquely to that satellite. The 17 new gateway locations must be separated from each other by at least 350-400 miles and must all be in the western half of the US and Canada. These constraints force the proposed site to be in western Washington State. 3. That existing towers or structures are not of a sufficient height or could not feasibly be extended to a sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering requirements to meet its coverage objective; There are no existing towers or structures in the vicinity to meet the applicant's coverage objectives and spacing requirements. The roof of the existing building on the subject site is not designed to withstand additional load of the proposed facility. 4. That existing structures or towers do not have sufficient structural strength to support the applicant's proposed antenna and ancillary facilities; The applicant has stated that due to the unique nature of the proposed facility and the need to have clear angle to the satellite there are no existing structures in the vicinity to meet the applicant's coverage objectives. Installing the proposed facility on the roof on the existing building on the site is not possible as the roof is not able to withstand additional structural load. 5. That the applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna; There are no interference issues anticipated with the proposed facility. The applicant is responsible for meeting Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements. 6. That the fees, costs or contractual provisions required by the owner or operator in order to share an existing tower or structure, or to locate at an alternative site, or to adapt an existing tower or structure or alternative site for sharing, are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower construction by 25% are presumed to be unreasonable; Co -location is not feasible. See response for requirement number 2 above. 7. That an alternative technology that does not require the use of a new tower, such as a cable microcell network using multiple low -powered transmitters/receivers attached to a wireline system, is unsuitable. Costs of alternative technology that exceed new tower or antenna development shall not be presumed to render the technology unsuitable; and Applicant has stated that the proposed satellite antenna is the only suitable technology to meet their communication objectives. Page 5 of 12 8. The applicant demonstrates other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures or other sites or alternative technologies unsuitable. All engineering and technological evidence must be provided and certified by a registered and qualified professional engineer and clearly demonstrate the evidence required. There are no existing structures in the vicinity that could be used in lieu of the proposed satellite antenna. C. The Hearing Examiner, after holding a public hearing, shall either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, or remand the application back to staff for further investigation in a manner consistent with the Hearing Examiner order. The Hearing Examiner will issue a decision on the proposal after the public hearing. Design Standards The City provides specific design standards for the placement of a WCF within the City of Tukwila. The tables below indicates if the applicant's proposal complies with required standards. Table 1 (See TMC 18.58.070 for further details) General Requirements Project does comply Project does not comply Not Applicable Notes 1. Generators or other devices which will create noise must comply with TMC 8.22 regarding noise. X Applicant has stated that the proposed facility will be connected to existing generator. Antenna will have one piece of equipment 'the reflector' (fan) that produces noise with a maximum 79 dB(A) produced occasionally. A Property Line Noise Analysis conducted for the reflector resulted in an expected dB(A) of 46 at the western property line, which is the nearest receiving property line from the proposed unit (see Attachment D). 2. Business License Requirement X Digital Fortress operate the WCF. Business number: BUS-0100848 3. Only safety signage must be placed on the WCF. X No signage is proposed other than necessary safety signs. Page 6 of 12 General Requirements Project does comply .Project does not comply Not Applicable Notes . 4. Accommodations for parking for maintenance personnel must be provided. X Site is located in a parking lot, offering ample access for maintenance personnel. 5. Towers shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness. X The tower will be galvanized steel, with a reflector made of steel and aluminum. The color, where needed will be neutral beige, standard IGW, to match the beige color of Building C. 6. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities to the natural setting and built environment. X Placement on the back of the property, in the partially cut hillside will minimize its profile and visual impact from the street. The dish will be below the sight line of residents in the adjacent apartment complex. No additional landscaping is required. 7. Antennas shall have the same color scheme as the structure they are located on. X Antennas will be compatible with the color of the adjacent Building C. 8. WCF poles and towers shall only have safety lights if required by a government agency. X Basic lighting is necessary for maintenance and security. The proposed lighting will be attached to two (2) 20' high poles, in two opposite corners mounted on the concrete foundation. Additional lighting at the site will only be used when work personnel are on -site for nighttime maintenance, typically twice per year. This requirement is intended to address ambient light pollution from wireless towers; the ambient lighting from this site will be similar to typical parking lot lighting. 9. No advertising is permitted on WCF X No advertising is proposed. 10. Each service provider shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet. However this restriction shall not apply to enclosures located within an existing commercial, industrial, residential or institutional building. X Equipment will be housed inside Building C. The antenna itself is not considered part of the equipment that is subject to this limit. It will be contained within an approximately 2,000 sq. ft. fenced area. Page 7 of 12 Table 2 (TMC 18.58.130 ) General Requirements Project does comply Project does not comply Not Applicable Notes 1. Height — Any proposed tower with antennas shall meet the height standards of the zoning district where the tower will be located. X Antenna is 8.1 meters 33.5 feet tall, which is below the maximum height limit of 45 feet. 2. Antenna and tower aesthetics — The applicant shall utilize a wireless communication concealed facility. The choice of concealing the wireless communication facility must be consistent with the overall use of the site. For example, having a tower appear like a flagpole would not be consistent if there are no buildings on the site. If a flag or other wind device is attached to the pole, it must be appropriate in scale to the size and diameter of the tower. X The proposed antenna location is behind Building C and partially cut into the hillside. The satellite antenna will be painted as needed with neutral beige to match the color of Building C to further diminish contrast with the site surroundings. 3. Setbacks — The proposed wireless communication facilities must meet the setbacks of the underlying -zoning district. If an exception is granted under TMC Section 18.58.180 with regards to height, the setback of the proposed wireless communication facilities will increase 2 feet for every foot in excess of the maximum permitted height in the zoning district. X The site plan (sheet G0.2 of Attachment C) shows the setbacks of 33.49 feet from the west property line of parcel 0001400003. The minimum setbacks of C/LI zone are 5 feet in back, unless it is adjacent to residential zones, in which case the setback is 15 feet. The proposed location meets the minimum setback requirements. 4. Color — The color of the tower shall be based on the surrounding land uses. X The proposed satellite antenna is constructed of galvanized steel and painted as necessary with neutral beige to match Building C. Graphic simulations (Attachment B) show how the proposed location helps screen the tower from adjacent properties and minimizes the aesthetic impact. Page 8 of 12 General Requirements Project does comply Project does not comply Not Applicable Notes 5. Feed lines and coaxial cables — All X All feed lines and cables will be feed lines and cables must be located located within the tower. The within the tower. Feed lines and cables tower will have an in -ground connecting the tower to the equipment cable connection to the indoor enclosure, which are not located within equipment area. The antenna will the wireless communication facility be connected to an existing equipment compound, must be located generator on -site. underground. CONCLUSIONS 1. As demonstrated in Tables 1 and 2, the project meets all applicable development standards for a Type 3 WCF. 2. The proposed modifications will not alter the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building or site design. 3. The proposed project is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff's recommendation to the hearing examiner is to approve this application for a Type III Wireless Communication Facility permit. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. A City of Tukwila building permit is required for the proposed tower. Also, an electric permit is required for any electrical work. 2. TMC 18.58.180 Expiration. Any application to install or operate a wireless communications facility shall expire exactly one year from the date of issuance of the application unless significant progress has been made to construct the facility. The City may extend the expiration period by up to one additional year due to circumstances outside of the control of the applicant. However, the City shall not issue an extension if any revisions have occurred to the City's Zoning Code which would affect the wireless communication facility approved application. Page 9 of 12 6 Attachment A: Vicinity map Page 10 of 12 • Attachment B: Graphic simulations of proposed antenna Page 11 of 12 Attachment C: Plan set (see separate attachment) Attachment D: Satellite Dish Digital Fortress —Property Line Noise Analysis (see separate attachment) Page 12 of 12 GENERAL NOTES ARCH coL op m. rm. / INTERIOR ABBREVIATIONS ow c ovro ,WI PAN F>fv.Tlw Nn.uun rr IxnNNm.v ° �° oATTEAD rt vx o COT nun„ Apo F. BUILDING SUMMARY ��ArI MORAL FORTRESS SEAinE.w.Ex A BUI.N61 CODES µ� INTERNATIONAL HUECO. GOOF - N. SCENE. KaNNSI IIT.+AccEssNwxla LF RuLE uANDOe AFAcurEs-am TT.. ION/OFF. eu.uxci TPNE IIO1xrH _wOULD TFPE OF 1ENFr .STRUULLY TUETTr I OCCUPANCY TYPE 1.0.6.I0TER TT.. EARING STnUC.. FIRE RESIETVE coNsTRucnow RE SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 2 HOURS , ENT SI. ENCLOSUES/ 2HOURS TWTNO•NEIXIWED PROJECT TEAM OlOr. FORTRESS w BLVRAL D. bRIND. SEATTLE.WANM ...CT/DESIGNER EARTH SOLUTIDNS NW cEpNCONSULTING ExoxE.S. ATTN:...SUS. .6L-y ...E. T.D-nx.O.9Bt c ,MG TIauL BIND.S. FLOOR w... SEA/TIE..RN. TOD a....M Bub WOE. ATTIC KEN ETICIDEv W ENG.. 1 Yacw... BAE W as 12 NF AW RNAM.,.VD. ED duINNETIONAL GATEWAY WEST LLD FiRENFE ,,,,F,N,EF•M 0...0 SYATTLE. AIA9FF LIFE PENNIES UNDER SEPARATE 1. I. OENEML E SHALL a.Oxa�a.Ox NATxOT�„ OF BOO NOT .WE DRAWN. CONTACT ARCNTECT FOR EN PAISSINO OBEN... WILNOT„TETHISREaERENET �aa=ix� EFr�000� aex.REGULATIONSa� NAL NOGIFIGATI.S. REQ.. OwNER OR AHONFITOT .1.0.- TALL NOT BE VALID UNLESS ALLIHarrEDxwRLTTNG ev OWNER MOOR ARCHT1Ecr. WT. NSF ISIBUISNE. OATS OF START Of GONSIRUCTION. THE CONTRANTOR SHALL Bann. WM. ROTH THE ARCHITECT AND OwNER Of P. MEAN WHOSE .111..0 CELNERV TO T. SITE BE LATF_R MAN THAT EEO.. FOR TIMELY NS.. sTIC1I W TIE Of:STRUT. ...OE WFAI� E ceArcMlEAtunOx, qt DEuv aF xsTWlwipN OPTIDxE TOeE AT T. CONTRAGTCW .ALL BE RESPONSE. FOR PROMING ALI WOW WITH DE LATEST La'x.UL[WO CCOEe NO aidNAMEG NO WTERWL.WAccauAlNCE IL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WI FIELD DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND SHALL REPORT ANYw.WN CONFLICTS OR CONHTNQs QUESTIONS FOR RESOLUTION BEFORE MCGEE.... THE WORN. DD NOT SCALE THE 0. Me VSEFLED HORDYMOW W xNI ALWAY0WAN.S,SN O'MALL.LOWNCT,DRSECURE AS 10. ALL NATE.. .111EQUIRIENT WALL SE INSTALLED RI STRICT ACCORDANCE W. uNNrAcrwERS WamEu INSTRUCTIONSAND TRADE sorl+TEe ACCEPTED ErAxOIRO.. H. ONTRACT00MULL PROWDE A WRITTENCONS1RUCTIDx8rNc,NFP T. INCLUDEAND D.F. DATES TER AND PRROVDESSU S� DU AND ASEETDELIVERY LEAD nE CONTRACTORSHuLCONSTRUCTION SH SCHEDULE A D.E. vso N 12. WORN aT SE SOEacEO WnN TIE WRONG NWNAOFUENT TO ABM owRUPT. TO THE T[NANTS CASEWORK INTERRUPTIONOP µO ELECTRiC.SERVICES.ELouTIOiN OFF OISY EIuSiwa EQUIPMEOF NT FM ..ETC..NU. BE FACRIMATED WITH THE WILL. UANAGENENT. DISRUPTION TO THE ADJACENT TE.NT S MUST BE REPLACED BEFORE cOF THAT DNxD »«� aT TEE HaIRW AN MLANDTBExaENENDEDxNENaDN IIR"WAYS.FI :ELEEVAT VEE'"�A .tea °E LLAREASONCEN.PRL.LSEsANaGGHAS:CONN. la..BEDULETNELSFOFTNEELEVATORW»,WED.NAIAGENENT. w •KEN ERIAL NET„NDN. REAauREDxEDiQADCONP.HEWWDR REa.EDFaBFxIGIEQWVEARWCE TO. GIINEPAL FRAM. FOR ucNTFM.. EL I r`OR ROVRES..SEWORNAo" BACKING.ARY 086 REC...n. SI. CONTRACTOR TO CmmxATE AU FIRE ALA. WO. WITH... OWNER ALL PERT NONNI. MATERIAL COLORS SE. .TCH NROBTECTS CONTROL REWIRE a.1ECTB REWLwPRwR To xBTALu,TaL SUU.1 TO WNCI.1ECTTNREiuIFCSOPNiiOES FOR ii CONTP.TOR SNALL EN SHOP sONCAABI o OARiWORK.L. NIIWORE ART TE OR"R B""Ho"P`"SF FOR REVIEW i»coaes FFoaR`kwRED`o""uIRwO FABRICATION ,ORAL E IN COPROWDEQAEraER THE RIEASBIA11.301 ".USER Of .1REWNTIONSPROVEE TDra LET. E I.TNTCYMYINPEETIO. DRAWING INDEX SURVEY G0.0 COVER SHEET/ PROJECT INFORMATION G0.2 SITE PLAN A1.0 ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS Sr.2 ANTENNA PLANS AND DETAILS ST-01 CIVIL PLAN WI RETAINING WALL DESIGN W2 RETAINING WALL DESIGN 52 FOUNDATION WALL DETAIL STREET MAP ENDnSI. l 5 . "\ Np - - ' W,;,„A�. LEGAL DESCRIPTION / PARCEL NUMBER R EAA012.1.,a PARCELKNEESA a.DAP,ID. STOEN.OFHENanNWEBTDaBERD GNMRASE T. H1E0EA oNI CSOuiTMNIT. TSE"O.. TTTIETO""L£PONTOFMOEN. TEBT TIEN. NORTH AM. EAST.Isom FEET TOAPnNT ONTIE WEamnr6001.4WAW UTE OF Y MEN. F.LOVANCI SAID 0.64 FEET: xo.IRR �awLN IInNs1REETTMSUT xo.ITE EA. 1122. TIERCE FOLLOWING SAID WEST., RIONTAF.E. WE ROYER 2.4,.... EAST. TFr. E FOF LEE.WONG OF �sWA"`111 3.4. WEST1T ROWNA T. THENCE SOUTH FEET' TNE NORTH WIT. E111FEETTETUEPOINTOF"G.0oDOFoT.aDu.RwRDD " ADERREOR.NGND.IDaDI,.RGmaDNNDDx.W WNGTa a ��„o © s� B. o ;/ ) i, ®,I SYMBOLS ELEVATbN REFERENCE Svusa I.CATES DEFINITIONS AND DIMENSIONS DEFINITIONS: T,E caNanON NOTED. msAR.x TO THE ..N. .°gym UTR.xm.TR,E.Nw AT ALL NEW AND nsTING NOTED. EN s SLAB... DFACE D FINISHED CEaxoTWES.UNLESS ...AExauTED q, i RECEIVED ' Ft rr-� "' 1 2 7 1,...1 .a aA COMMIJNI I Y I SURFACES TO WENU DETAIL ID 6 FLEET No. DRAWING nnE EAR wx OMB. TITLE A.iyxcu !IDEATES oENncu COUPLE. SYSTEM FOR auRACT.ST. F.T. CON.. NOTED. ANvcarw.Nrs ro�E.EE �i OTTEEDiniiN u INNauTE0IN THE PawECPROVIDE Tmc 0.O.R.AT.AGLING.T I. r wmxaTN_ Iw AND SHALL s-rvPECFaWTFOR ...FE SIN Oxs. l `_ SEC REFERENDE.YI.oL I vli FLOOR ELEVATION trxFs _ HEED T1.0 ,BELOW, ®REFEIE..cE 8.1164. f_ . SPACE /ROM ID CM I. OMENS.. . INDICATED TO THE FACE OF FINISHED SURFACE CONSTRU=naN.CENTER OF COLUMNS ON OREUNEE UNLESS OTHERWISE THE FOLLOWING mlcwlr ORD. A- STRUGIUML OFIA.N. EN. SCALE O. Nu asCllwE E. ROOR PLANS SHALL ...ED. HEF. D E,E ` ACETIEU MATERIAL,UNESSNOTEDN W INFBNFLOOR FE. FLOOR ELEVATION OR FACE OF FINISH UATExAL FOR OTHER OTHERWISE NOTACOUSTIC CEA. ED. IvrrEu SS.LLMICA DWC a° VI/ I ITT I -- SPACE NUMBER Ooo.W.O i. ODDCLIIEN*aEET a..xaL oIEYEDxEETNO., L e AT 0 II. cmrtmoE p r RE`AapNnAeER DkVLLOPMLNT SAIBEY SABER AR.TECTBIE fAbowcom IRROCHII[ClST[REU a. LN[Ra0x OVELENT SABEY DATA CENTERS INTERGATE.WEST BUILDING C DIGITAL FORTRESS 12101 TUKWILA INT. BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98168 i ergate.west CESCarTION COVER SHEET PROJECT INFORMATION G0.0 A PORTION OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) NOTES LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Awn A PARCEL DI.L. ODOM. GO rs, COAHAN13 03103101 r ISO RES.. rs ME FR. an Art w .x,. ALTA NT OSTER NO E NORM UNE or THE SOUNDS, QUARTER OF SECTION O. SUNK ON *MN IT BASED WERE DSC oIN6004.10 AT ONG a ONG COUNTY.1 ° NOTO1...11111 a NOS . OF TIIr EAST " moo o.w NCR.. OF THE WM �. SOUTHQUARTER a �n°R Nnor OTED PREPARINGE6E ITSUID AFFECT. ME T1., '`�° 'Y, 50.4631 CORN. or SAIO NORM W H NORSOUTHTH W W x Rr r o Nx R W MER. WHOLLY OWLKUED S NE WE,BovE , T NO o DST. 3.1S M t �) 1ION a RESTO THE W JOT ssHny «o. I-: . WrTHE AMIDST MM. RW 10.1 DOES MT RN. . SPEW. ; S. S Cr 11E NORM INK OF THE QUARTER NE OF THE DOLE `HOHH.o CORNER rw.NHREECE SOL. MITTS DST. ALONG 1. E DOSNCH. 21.111 MEN •�H �. R N r�wYUNE OF D STATE SWIFT .ATE NO M. UNDER 600.4110 110. xMETEDN HENaOo� O Na 0061011 NEC.. OF KM GOWN. 1103.310.1 Q�/.nz ! THENCE 501. 6627.33. 06, MONO . NORTH LNE Or 363 SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF RE SOUREAST CWT. 1.16 FEET TO A PONT DOT 6 NORM KITTS MVO X000 FEET FROU 1110. SOL. MST. TaST. 14104 NE KM. ROM OF WAY UNt or PRINART STATE NOWT w TE 131H.3,3nON or 340 NORM UNE OF RE SOUTHEAST ammo OF DE va) zoom 11.1 QUAKER c 1s.1 1 4. THE PROPERTY DEPOTS uro ovwwEn PwEDx Exnnm ,w AKA Cr uwwrMaELT STREET TO JCT UN NO. 1-K APPRO., SET 23. MOTS Porn 24,313,1EST. 121.11 rem TNOCE SOON 202313. DST. 27.38 FEET, 1 RE. A. NO EDELL EOM.. OR OTHER DENOMINENTS. MON IS SNOW TO. 66111 ILTSVSE DST. MD FED; NOCE SOUTH 6.001. MST. 12047 Mt 1 TNT ALTA SURVEY SONDES NO TWE • MM. IT 6 MN . NTOR Or THIS SUMO 10 THENCE K. STSSIT DST. MK RT. MOO NORM SEISSS KS, 311342 FEET TO . TRUE POINT Cf 160•1100 THOU nom worm. ' 'ax N1 AS NMLOT mW¢ NIT Z MICRu A. or uxxrc. www- jy' MOM NORM MST. DST. WOK FEET: THENCE nom 133213. EAST, lax FIST To A PONT W SND WESTERLY MoxT-or-W.v IMEOf SR SR EXCEPTIONS FROM TITLE REPORT MDT) ,N• HOIODTG"10fCf1pf'"`RA owT"""`N. N "`or".Wo"(pc;1, A a:. CE Cr a"1AO10 FLEE TnToa e-11. wan. no mon. wen FOR m PARCEL HST nvwr»T. DOWN.. TO A FONT COI IMO SOUTH UNE CI DE HORD 1.113 Or TIE 401011 DV OF ME SCYTHE,. IS SUBSET TO IN 1.1610.6613 LDS.. NTERIST M . REC. ONOUP. MC.. NO THE RECORDED UNDO KOCK.. 1990.00230. SUENED TO AN UNRECORDED 133361.3 EST Br 001304.00, MD DOWN.,NO AS .00E0 BY NOAORNION nWM�"rS,qrp¢p[ °v i COPE.D AS�0T x rtD•c-x1. wm1.1 OF L. DIEKc I,E OZ0Z. D. WlooaxtR. MmRm C xwD caxrc. VD.Nc�Iw R) R) 200103270D120. S.1axAS •IDxVILET 1OUA0. FLU FEN THE CORNER Cf THE NORTHEAST KW Y tWxS. W.. OF lumen K axewFD IN MmuMM R¢vnc[o 5. SURER TO MY SPIRECOROED NO sown. 16.01 • EAST, >aI RE DETERMINED 4OW�=TWNRaF RMNDAFEM Twro 1N 1SE 14. 1%Keno. ) MO. SOUTH WS EAST. MSTEUENNT ECORDED DOD T. 340 MENCC1 NORM W'oD. w• 1ST 33 ai) .TO A FOmH TIE m rx NO. I -WRY IwE �: [M O 1/ 4 OF ETERSnwlrxi D FR. HE Cf THE TERNS L( 7ECIS ornmWw 10 1104* MIPRNAMY LD. was, . WAY UK (11E aoa,Do- ROW. NNG . SOUTH) TS'CON.. •w ENO '�) R w 9011 -TANDOrt DMA TO OirU . MT nMiu AKOF a �nH ar IS. RARER TO AN VS.. FOR SonLay SEWER PURPOSES ONO THE TOMS AND ONIOMONS uircR I. W DO. FORLORN. 143 KS." 0006-0E-111. DE ND. 1170171. FAST IWO nzn DENOOF MK. TO RAMER WU OMR COMET . CONTNED IN INST./. .20460 MO. P.P. DIDIESTOM RORK 'aFvi a.nTENTiRE Nns n'i t I6COWIMrc aEN W NAEar SOWN a.olz, XL TANECT TO XI EASINENT MR WATER PURPOSES MO TIE TO. AND COMM. ROSIE 0 OFWOO REDMOND .. 517.27. TIE LOCATOR SAO It" IS CODED NOON naXa xORIN Ora v War. 1141 Mt u WALED TO TINT PANT OF D3003R FOR MOMS NM EGRESS AM DE TO. ANC 1110. SOUTH $26/27. WEST. 0413 KEW MOM. DOI. CRANED TO SPECKED MOOS NO SUCCESSORS . 01.1NNO1 M THEN. NOON 131S TEST. 334.2.2 MT TO ME TXX MINT X SEWN. M.K110.1 AS wowf Txco'oac xo. xlmewlx REmlms a oc mMIY. wwNWTviael) RE -RECORDED . III RECORDING NO. mlvlwas N° .: 11,11X11 RICO.. NO. 11011617 DE LOCATOR OF ME MUD 3•3043115 16PCTED HERON. 22. NEL.= TO AN DN.. FOR MCCIS ANO SMOAK SEER PURPOSES ANO /HE TOMS AND COND.. MOW AS CONTAINED TN NOON. RECO.. UNDER RECO.. HO. • .>• .. v A PONT DN ME Nxm DC OF THE SDDMEAST OWN. REC. MEN1NR ET aNx.AY DORMS I MMN TERNSCONDITIONS T ., NGW RN.. W.N.1MS w SOUTH rIrW SOUTHEAST NMI .DIM. SG. SUILECT TO AN EASON. FOR Wean EWER PLIRPOSES NC THE TOW ANO COO.. MINCE wTH :r,aarCOMER ustMx,.."a x"mr ,o M',wWiE r�wlT v 110.010. INDEX 030003 TO FAMER VISTA SERER ODIRCT AS COM.. M INSTRLNENT RECORDED MINX KRIS SOW.. 163T. 27.16 TELT. 163EOF GRANTED TO SPEWED 10.03 N.0 SLICOODORS AS DODDS. N STATUTORY TIE LOCA. Of SAIO MINCE NORM .W.34. EAST. Y I T, 1OF PIONIAT STNE NW.. i((v n) SOWN 111111 SPONT WEET TO OTMN NO. -aF-WAY IPA[ M.P. NO .mvtoxT'TW6 xrp mxonwxs HEREOF ammo TO ONG =OK WATER 001610 NO. XI COMANIM IN MORDENT RECORDED r tI NOV. WEEEMMS D.STIRE 0 rtON M 11661 NM COROT. THEREOF MINX FOU-001110 KS.. -MY MIRH Dr WRrKCORMID N. awlmvlMM LOCATIONM1 Of S. d COKTED DORM 30 10 AN 101131•31 10 31.33 UK CS Ott NMI OF WY T. A DM NO DD. FOE.. SSD KSTOLT FIGHT-0,111AT DE SO. WIT. DST. IMOD FOE COIRAINCATIONS CONDUIT MO THE IL. COVENANTS NO COW. 0.T.ED MAM " THawI T v . Gmio,Ia DF 1om Fen . arva. LOOM R`31. 311116CT TO AN AN EASOMIT FOR WW1 PLIIMOSES MO DE TERNS AND CONDIDONS . SUBJECT TO EMORENTS TOR NORM MISS IND imam.. sr UDR. 4,10 RE WMOI Im cRc ro xlGn.olA REmIMa a N.c'O1'"`MI".r i DMME 1ST m00011..rr.. 1u.Tua G• MO Wn mDr N,e warm Iwc nl.57 7-axEVmS.R0Wwlrw1A<1A.D BOUNDARY AND SECTION CONTROL DATA MOOTS Nq WIl'.x . . (NI) 'mar (m. RI) I, TAT CENTER. OND 0M N SECTION 5KM SURVEY INSTRUMENTATION: or snlNY PEO.AED N MIN MS RECORD UTRITED T. FOLLOWS MU.. AM PRXECUTES. BASIS OF HORIZONTAL DATUM: ;� MD a,„1 ( E�M Rw +xe GrrNICES MOM HERON RW GROUND DISTANCE. SCALE. 1" - 200' 10 Harx»T s.N .7I.(0) DATE FOUND 6 HMS OHM CONMETC urm v/W Tr (m) w (RI) SHEET 2 SHEET 3 01 (1,(R xEnTa,-\ I/ IW,.E.•(a1u SRNHOIELwC0001 Cl rim NOW SABEY CORPORATION OLEO.. On DIM. w..vAn STD 1 OF 3 MRa,a Tax Puce. w. 0023040000 TAXPAYER FAIRMLD WASPFFNDOD LP R OF SFOTNH! 0 ORANNO WAS nNR\owR\69w-.nc\2.2\m.\000 ,0m.04-02 o,c (es, INTX 0.2 IN Ft 0 25. A PORTION OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MAY RwrtaF-VIAT N 89'16'16' W 102 39' (ESN) N 891635 W 10107',RI) T. PARCEL w. 0023040400 NLHA-WODDRIME PARK LTD PTN ♦ / / 0R ♦ / / �®ER MOAN, �..�., • j // / ♦\ ♦♦\\ ♦ /R, \ I 1' \ I \ \ \ \ \ TAX PARCEL w. 00200104T0 NCPA-WDDORDOE PARR LTD PIN ® x evlR 2s w 2o0oi,'((v,)) \ \\ \\ PARCEL D \ \ T. vAx¢ No 0.22049209 \ 2001 Rxx O .nAA0 ♦ �\• l N.N<. TAX PARCEL w. O0E3040460 NCRA-WOOOR✓o0E PAP% LTD PTN SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 \ sNu 1pio wxonus n Cxim00cu1T10 TNis RR Su66E0uENr m (v�) 'lp (\µ\ N 2az)'42- W 126.00' (ESN) N 24'2l•2E w 126 00' (RI) R-2B0500 V 0T A.,1'2B'4T' FE LEGEND O 6TORu TR. WON euwu ▪ PO.ER POLL PAWNT POO R OR TEmwc RxE 00 WATER YER1 • POR.0 WOMEN! NOTED0 1D MBAR A. •s W,FENCE MK D 0 MITOIEKE TO W.V. ErCEPTION3 TDRDE2N94319N6xET1 Cm) 1. LENGTH 1w) RAD. RURAL .NE LINE TABLE 0EAAN0 L216N) R 4Ell 2 2LYNN N 2E47'01W 2,• Y11. SCALE 1" — 50' NO GOGNFrONASIE °'/J-/e-zuaf =y€A 6 aes � SABEY CORPORATION OD NO 1112-0). NOS DESIGNED IN OINWNRr DIN/N./Dr [NECKED NI Or ON IS 2 Of 3 RM6 R T. PANEL NO.0023040480 NCXA-wOOMIX.E PAWN LTD PIN x eaxo+e w eO. is 1(n,j) PARCEL B l ) is i/. a sccnON e I/2 NI /2 1/4 SE I/. Or SECT. . T. PAPELL ND. 0028045080 TAXPAYER ACRE STEM. ESNAw1D• - 'S2Ex\Oa.\OOew0+svL1A<xOAO A PORTION OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Tvz40. O30030 NETAXPAYER PARK LTD PTN NBe'27.39Yl1104 ai'(E54) 1.159.27.33TW 10410. (31) ®,O Ole sum., SOPER E.t.a ITT orToOTCROVNO 5,.x1cs EASTJADIT 3 PARCEL All 1 TAX PARCEL NO 002.300.137 EB'SObY w NBB 3' (E54) eO'3o'1B' T. PARCEL TO. OOxvnm TAXIAYER SIiA SHADC1( TAX PARCELTO. TAXPAYER suwIDaT u",vm. AND FOUND 1. IRON PPE Pori NO SARK IN USE SSD, CENTER Cr PPE UNE LNESNI 56u1,OTTN11 11EL1 1.6031T LEGEND rvwu eoi[ w/uo-0 MICR Os MERTON( MX ® TO. lc.. g I0m4 uunxxl AS NOTED MONO RR. "AP D MM.& OF awNE FENCE PRE MCC CHTP-Urir TI MOM. oranaio. TO TO NOS AS a+OAx ON WET 1 f Ion. TICTASTOr tret () O01003 Awu AEmAONO xO DELTA R MOO 1. LEWIN (R) WOOL OW. LINE TABLE fa 24 N OMIT. TT 0 m ,e WRIT INTO ies ST Se SCALE: 1' - 50' REviSiOTTS MICR RIOW/Wit /Hg-c '9 SABEY CORPORATION pap lakia MONO Or ORATTN OTA/u+/w CHECKED or or OATS 3 or334o83 \ 1 PROPERTY LINE Oz SITE PLAN HUGHES TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS JUPITER II 8.1 METER ANTENNA IS WATER LINE EASEMENT LOCATION PLAN TS PARKING SUMMARY: REFER TO ORIGINAL GORE AND SHELL BUILDING PERMIT: BUILDING SUMMARY: USE TYPE F-2 (BUILDING A) 51,250 SF OFFICE SPACE: 113250 SF PARKING SUMMARY: REQUIRED FOR F2 (1/1000) 52 STALLS REQUIRED FOR B (25/1000) 434 STALLS TOTAL REQUIRED: 486 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED ON SITE 151(2/26/10/EXISTING ADJUSTED AFTER GENERATOR PERMIT 2/26/10 DEMOLISHED STALLS 1 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED ON SITE 150 (3/10/15/AFTER SATELLITE DISH INSTALLATION ANTENNA LOCATNNI A RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASE M NT 4°LIOv°a-°°Do4s°aa�°o°oeo�, 1 , anca x 5RA o, �wD�R�ON SABEY DATA CENTERS INTERGATE.WEST BUILDING C DIGITAL FORTRESS 12101 TUKWILA INT. BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98168 urntergate.west UAW I are MWW10. moulm mu, mean SITE PLAN - l if\L°17 1 1.4 °BUILDING- SITE SECTION LIGHTING 11 I'hE/ii►�1 /LEAP 0110•110N111111: TYI IMMII•MIIVi6R.011010V019910�IMd imminimgroseremagrisemmosawagimani. — O U 0E 1111. --1--1--1--1" ' 'TT 1 'T -, LIGHTING Amp °2 TYPICAL SECTION SEE BUILDING C DP. / NnTE NOTE: DI. LOCATION SNOWN FOR CRLANIC REPOSES ONLY FEN ANTENNA DEN ANGLE TO OE DETERNINEO gEEC NSTALUTPN Es / BOND Ill SACCO BUILD. C —I III LT 111 1 1 1 °GRAPHIC SIMULATION OF ANTENNA S NO FNNANTENNA PrZFO OOE IUNA, ETRVIO NSTNUTION °GRAPHIC SIMULATION OF ANTENNA 1775 NOIF: qSx LAM= OWNN L°2 OE ARYCRMOEEl q4v FNAL ANTENNA qBN ANOLE TO RE CETERAWEo DURNO PRITALLATION Q 49 IMO WEL ] EAST ELEVATION ShBEY SAHEL, ARCHITECTURE Mysorn 1� ' Rccrsrtam � i NCNRfCi SABEY DATA CENTERS INTERGATE.WEST BUILDING C DIGITAL FORTRESS 12101 TUKWILA INT. BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98168 NNx I DATE DFcwlvw ELEVATIONS/SECTION$ A1.0 -0 / \ J tlr;i 6, A ON Only I. NE SINAI INDICATES A CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS REVISION VHLRL 'X' IS WC REVISION LEVEL 2 REMOVE ALL BLRRS AND SHARP EDGES 7DIKNCIIINC •PI Y AFTER PI A11NG=111. ANTENNA ELEVATION x*s w egMf . RIPIDD/D NLTD151 Ili, B Produce SP.clflcalbm vatet anDFCA,C.r x" " AA,Saa.E r11,":" vary . " e. w r r, ... Product P.rtomwno. rope us .c..al t ;l'EP.i•=o 1 tags l �' P. o"Uot�Clm.n.IJru MOW . •1 W ../ ,...,� �.,�Ana 'iz faiigbi FAN ®xs SPECIFICATION SABEY 1�" \ FcwscFm � > al,cw.Ecl u spv or A„D�F�Ox MUM 11/PROVEUEXT: SABEY DATA CENTERS INTERGATE.WEST BUILDING C DIGITAL FORTRESS 12101 TUKWILA INT. BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98168 LOCATION MAP SOI1: 1'.00 PROPERTY—UNL1 = - — - - Scale : 1' = 10' — — "r — -------- -`---- -_IALT. OR.M AND CE0.RO LOCATION— -'- —' -- -- - - PIX 60LS.GYRADt$.RCp11.0_44alS .,�- _- — - _ -- -- '- — 129.14 TG 12144 BOI ^a 12643001-oY1N— — -- --. —. IJ2.45 rG --- — U O ao,,6h°2nea4n°'Y.o�0n00 PLAN VIEW HUGHES TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS JUPITER II 8.1 METER ANTENNA , o L4ti � I.d �o A Eal.�! o .......".„........ rifR EXCAYA o�.........„.......... ' sa+w,D . fJ TYPICALSECTION NOTE 6015111 OURPOSES ONLY .NAL1Ax411-EpN LE31.31.411 FOR TOi6 D`DETEMNIED OURNO w.AluYol CONSTRUCTION NOTES 8 QUANTITIES O NSWL KICKS IE IOat S0(6 5 - AAMIER I ANUMIA PIR SEPIRAIE PIRA' 100 WI15WKf AMEN. [OI11134101 Pat COWL 11/52 Cr WADI x 7M111SAAKORAL PUNS 111A 1 m614ACr 3/: G MEL I' O® NY 00 OAeu. tam E ma SECURITY 1a101O MN 410E WAIL 1.0001C 44W IW li R10D TO MEET NSERIY WTI PLaORL0161IR CLAWING Na/YA I8AV10'4PN0 CCNSIWCI L0ANAW MAIL PAX BY I' 1407 MED MIN 010903ID NI U Mink 24YJ ad 21416' EC0-41001 WALL S2S414 15 FA Gowt.mumPER HIM NEIN[NM smut PLANS el'Mare N/A MINL 12' P1C SORM ORAN PIPr W B ® CONSTRUCT 1 KC BY 4' INO C0grt1E WAX RUSH I/f0 O CONC ANTENNA 7QN0A11CI!_10I IT pa Sr ® M1oU 6'(1BI) LON CONCRETE ux PER OEM 12/51 CR UMW * YAM S1RUCRRAL RAMS YA Y o MTN1 IEIN STAIR AS4143LY I EA ® 54A011 AID REYOIE AC PA101R1 ND CNC SOEINII NO S DEMOLITION NOTES B RBt01E ass Sr OrEBSIM AC PA18EItr at, elm u- Of 0640 COIOER ate MD axon. EARTHWORK WI. 210 COW YAMS ILL.120 CWC YARDS 007. 140 DAIC YAMS NOTE I - ED.V.O. 010 EXCAVATION TALL 1FAN AID Wm0O LOLAINN PO SOTS ETIG11036 REW11110I1DA106 DIGITAL FORTRESS ANTENNA Z 0 J 1- Z ST-01 1 a 1 ..a. SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL A Woh Nail conalel d fumlNbg and ton0mdbn ofa Ulu Block Rebblat) Wait System or equal in lac.danee wIlh these wwifimt.ns and In resaonably does conformity wtf 1h Ines. gmadee, and dimensions shown on one plans. 5. Wh bdudes pnpadng foundation w1.l0Msng and kul.5r bv.Mlg peels, deinage 51 ant bedklil l01h Mies and gnas shown an IRA ca0Yrodon dmvtps. SUBMITTALS A Contra., NW sub. to the GI.I...0 Engineer • Manuledura't Csr?0celion, Net w rl 01.0 ..tatand r*udur b•I1*0�n 0000,0 won roes one nOuremen4 CUALRYASSURANCE B. COMrockah o0ar Nen owner. Nut anon.inta prior wpa.lce on projects ...We and magnitude where the sped. .*0,.1g well system had been construcled sucwseuly. Cont. nemee OM telephone numbers siwl be H1•d welt p1Opct. Owner NN provide wl keeling add aesRy assurance Inspection N a WNW. ...during earthwork and wall ooncndbn ope.iont. Owur\ twits aseunnw program dose not relieve Iles contractor of reep0mlblly 1. ea. pedormenue '),INERT, STORAGE AND HANDLING Contractor .all check ell melerl•Is upon delivery to insure that IRA pamper Nes. J.-a, color. and cer/b.ibn less hen .Delved. B. Contractor Nall protect el materiels from damage due to job site conditions and In accordance with manufacturer's reamm.nd.tba. Damage! materlele Nat of 0Incorporated lob Ne work. PRODUCTS DEFINITIONS A. Bock: a canal• retaining wall some., wet cent Il.m Portland Cement. water, end aggregates. wllh dkaabn. of 2.4BH. 4.S2W B. Drainage NIL dninwe •ggr.gde 0Okh le pieced Wmed0l.0 hhbd the modeler concrete units. (2- C-n Co1Sed Rook) BLOCK RETAINING WALL UNITS A Block U. shall conform lO the blowing echieceural requiremn.L Bond Configuration: run0np with bonds nombel)l boated at mipo. vellksky adjacent unils, in both straight end curved alignments. B. Bock maler.ls shell Nnloml to the fsookemente of Standard Specifications 1. UXu Blest Wa1 Units. C. Bock Units steal conform to IM1a blowing drodural and geometric requirements measured in •ccordawe with appropriate rNaren0s: minknum oompn0We Wrangih • 2,200 pal (25 -day) .0wrplbn • 616 (max.) for standard weight eg0r.gttet N1 size • 2.511. 5.0W • 2S7) 0inkn.n Nit v-slght • 4,320 bs)m1 (spprmhate) BASE LEVELING PAD MATERIAL A. Mater)SNMNn. of MeeNhtlet mine deWdrock compacted to g5 percent ant placed es shown on IRA Nntlmdlon drawings. AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES A. Vwbe.Algnment• 1.5' over any 10 dlste0n /_B. WIN Began w0hin 2 degrees of daegn boner \Nodmnl.AXgnmenf.1t over emlO' disc. comer, hells, curves .l I1.Io Ihe.Nbal btallon u. Maximum horizontal gap b.Iten erected units shall be 1/2 hch FIELD DUALITY CONTROL Th. won construction slut h obaervad by the Gaclecbnical Engineer On • full.. h•sb. Testing of the con... MwMl1 wit be perornsd by ln. O.ct.ohnlnl Engin.er. B. As a minimum. au0Ry 1a3101an010 MOW include foundation s01 bp.d on, soli and h.00M I.alkp. v.Mblbn of sagn parameters. and obwn.bn of ooalm.en for gene.i campi.oce wan aNpn drawvge.M .p.cl shows. DRAINAGE FILL A. Drainage Fill Nall cons. d 2' Chen Crushed Rock. BASE LEVELING PAD A, leveling Pad Material thal cons. ol• mbknum of 6' of 5/B' Minus Cru*eel Rods. B. 5ubgude Sol babe Leveling Pad Maled.. Nall be Nmp•ded to • minknum of f15% Modified Prod. Density par AVM 0-1557. C. Leveling Pad MN 0 prepared to Mrs ful contact to one base surface of Ne Contra• Uitra Block Un0. ULTRA BLOCK UNIT INSTALLADON Fite Nurse of Ulla Blocks shalt be placed on the levebg pad •1 Nor appropriate Eno ant grade. Mona. and oval.ha1W Nwkadb•I dhw0Ms end ins.e Mal •l unaa ere in Iw mead 0Ih the rose and property wet.. Plow the Iron uNs sloe-byaoa. Gape Ne6 h m0XMxed between adPcee mid. leyml o1 comers ant Neer. Nail be In wcor .roe with munot•durer S recommend.. and ins W11on puMNbw. C. Pew and mmpee Drainage FM behind Ule Bind U..s. FNwv wall erection and drainage fill bwiy with block pboome0. Place gw9M es shawl on plans. Compel reinforced bac.lo 0594(12' D. Maximum stacked vertoal hegO of UN. Block Wall Units, priorto unit Drainage Fit and backfi ph t... and compaction. Nell not wooed two Nukes. (5 fed). GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT A. GeagMwNaloonst of MiegM 5XT and NXT,. approved equialent(see gsagrd hdub). REINFORCED BACKFILL Reinforcement zone bwk111 Nat walsl et arable granular matadal approved by geolscfl*AI end... Imp. new.. Beaty ...awry Cloy. hVM1 PYNcity wile NA not be ago... AP.erbate Iammdm I 411 + TOP VIEW W.ag4,]3A lids SIDE VIEW T 1 Z 46 I. 2b END VIEW ULTRA BLOCK UNIT DETAIL NOT -TO -SCALE S of Blocks War WISH (San) GEOGRID Geogr. Leeg1h IS )• l SCHEDULE Geogr. Layer 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 0 6.0 A A 4 10.0 S.0 A A A 5 125 10.0 B A A A - - - - 6 150 13.0 BB A A A - - - - • Meow kad from bark 0( bb4k ONO. A• Mkag.5KT B • Ming. MT ULTRA BLOCK MSE WALL - CONDITION 1 NA .stye m•t5'Ryo.l NOT -TO -SCALE 1*1.11 III WEIII cR%001,. 11= (�, Mann•E'•.TOP) ceewmol Eepk»..o 1'G•ww Nmmr usarm.0u+. doh C""nn5i°'ere G7Cln4cr0Nae 90e0 ULTRA BLOCK MSE WALL - CONDITION 2 NOT -TO -SCALE Per 0440.9199941 r—TTT1 t b f 1 W/ Ulm Mar R,w0 5' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL NOT .,Q. SCALE 10.0' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 7.5' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL Leto. 0Nca TANN,. OrNxxMro 12.5' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL NOT -TO ...LE .:Mot .oz ..m INTO `" omwi EN..+su 1 Temporary Emterersol atTme 0.Caulve Teatime Pea Clean Cruet* Rook oK 15' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL A 1 W2 • G` a4 5 1 1 DESIGN CRITERIA I. 00.CNNNO COWING CODE NTERNAT101YLOAL0N0 000E 2012 WND LOMC MI Mc 031230lCNl OVER CCICMC L0AD0 FOR ANTEWNnroU OATEN 000cN. ANTENNAr0U00-ION OCCICNW1143 LD,000 "CD ON CW'NCR VOLUNTARY UMIAK r OR WNDOPCED M A MDw T NOE rncrat IN: 1.0 D DARE WWI CPCED O CCCOND OFT WIND WEED). IC 1,11(C0IMCC LEVELWNID C'ECD) O. °MOORE CATEGORY 0 GENERAL NOTES ELTCN I - 061EML REQUIREMENTS 1.1 TIEDE NOTE°°EWE AC TIC PROCCT OCGrI01RON0. 12 UIC0i0R0U110 URLRI©: LOM"E D(IOTINO U'UTICO. AND. NOTIFY ENCNEER Er E03rINOUTIUTICC OR SUCORADC CON3ITIONO W1110II INTERFERE Wirt' WORK 13 W0MIRAL3M0 01.101100)10N0: A WOMT TIC raLOMNC rO(11CWLW: 1. C0KSYTE M10 E0101407En AC1001) 2 ANTENNA rOUNATON rcINODINOOOP DRAW1100. E ENGINEERS AFFIRM./ SNAILS( SECURED FOR ALL W3STTUTION3. C. NONCONaUVNOC: NOn4YDIONCCR Cr CONDITION° N OT CONONNOTm FM TIC 001rRACT OOCULENTO MORT°MOOEEDINO,0CORRECTIVE WORK. CUNT TNOPOOED 11(£NR TONE O 103 1NR rat AOSCONTRACTOR CONTCTOR )141E o0M']ICnic MmINwWRRN, INC. Ton CECOING TIE RTNR IA COORaNATON. A oTWOTURULOMWN00 MC NOT .,l000 ONC 000LMWT0 AND ARE INTCNUCD TO OE1190 IN CON...011EN WRIT OM ELECTRIC, MO oP m1v00 rROM WIER DOOM13HC0 TIE CONTRACTOR 4LL 000110NATC nll mounEMERC O TIC CONTRACT DOCUMENT° NTD 0110P ORWA1400ND WOW 15 OTATEMENT OR cocci, INOTCCTION: N ACCORDANCE WITI1302012 0E010l1>01. TI1C 3WNE131ALLENTLOY 00C001CRCD CICCIAL NOY)T0R TO CCF.rnr0C Ti IC r01.10WINC VCRr,MTIDNCMD o'COIALINorscr ONO. DURATION° Or TICICOUIREO ♦LT0IrICAT10NC AND OrCON. INCIE3TICNO MC TO CC 001MYLTm ON A ranCO1C OR CONTINUOUS &61SAS 3EFNIEO EY THE AP'LICAHIE I0 T(HLE CITED DELOW. 2W TAEE 13'01.>, ITEIC I TI1Ru 0 CONCRETE' TA01L 1704 4,103401, 3 NO0. NOTION 3-100000TOND 21 OMEN OIMCFIA A THE 3EOTECNMCALRE2ORTPREPARED BY NUM0R DATED MONDE°CNITCRUA TOR T IC FOUNDATION DEOION TOR TIE PROCCT. ▪ 1-001.I1400: 1. COLOWONO I lroono: 1600 POT. 2 A00:0 mutton,. mutton1EML LOMO CMC PLDICO MAO0ADNATION Or OTONAL mount CC AO % COVE EMTN rnuounC LONOAN NLIV,VOLL COEFFICIENT Or MS (FICTION 0(0.30 MO M CIOUIVAENT P100F2 rfICCWrc Or YA RCfA-r, RCCFCCTIVELY. ECTION 3 - EIRUCNRAL CONCRETE 31 ALL WORK 01 ALL 00NrCM1 WITH AC1331 322 NONI1000 A 0200000E INC NT1.1.C16. ON.DC CO. 0 crueSo:N0 ON1014004-rcNr0111C1CN1 rtMNTCUCICCRT M NOTED ONORAWNc0 33 ANTENNA F 1/1.0,10N0OR01402POVDE4b3P0133 MYC'rc10TIL FI> IDCo,CDMCIrrlWO CONTENT (TYPE 1 CE1.f0R,)AWSKIM WO RNTIC -060, C%MR CNTRNMENT, MU MCC° Wan AT 1.1003Ml3 CLUMP. (ELM CONCRETE MAT: >60 PCI S MY SRRE10T1) R0®1.0•EA WAY, 1. ANTENNA NOTES 1 ANTENNA FOUNDAION RENORCNO SNNLFEACWRATELYMIED T00ETIERIN F0RL18 SC AS TORE CCOUOLYIELD N r1A0C AND NOT ODIUM TIC 01401101100LTOM DASD RATCC MOM TIERRCOUIRCD MOTION. A0TE14.AI0NOROOLT2 GYRATE NA0UPPUER) 314110E FLAW AND LOCA1CO WRIIN 1R'0r TRUE rOOT:ON AND OIAL DE OoNfinmo0 DV AMCNNA WOOER MORRO ANTENNA IVGCMCNT AND COOUAENCO ni TIME Or COUOTNUJTION. 3 ADDITIONAL RCOUIREMITC A ALLCONCRETE SOUL S( TNOROUGHLY CONSOLIDATED EY VE AT ON OWING PUCEMB.'r WITH CARC'MEN NOT TO DaUROALONMCNT or mown DOLT° OR E.CCD RATED CONCRETE MWT CUM rat AT LUCT 14 MVO MOR TO GETTING ANTCNNAOR TIO REMO TIC MCllonm TC. RCTCRO4CC °ATWELEYA-ION NCR 4WL aUWF(O0 00000 To 311'C DRLW0VOO r00 ACTUALaNArKN3. 6. ANCNNArou000rION IC 000100EI IN ACC ORONICCWITII LOMINORCOORCICMC CET r]TTIIIN ORAYINCC PREYRCD OYA.0•0 741A1 INC, DMWINO76AD12. R1MCI01'C, DATED 0/E03. CD CD Q CD cp KEY NOTES corn UNE DOLT GROUPA110N3Vlloll CCIRERUICCr ANTENAr4UNM1O0. OIOn [CUOMO TO/PLATE. FE: CallR. NNACENTCIUNCI1GaNORELATNC ToTnuc 1Dnni WITI I MC IITCCT AND OTC IWN IM To rommnio ANTENNA 1'01/N0M10N. OAP CI LWECn. LOW COOnCTCMNi, RL 1213E 040I4'I1 OLNO.T1010N ALL 310E0 ACIXMACT T09614DENOW MRKn0,3390 O/ LE,NO Cr NEOU MEAL TMrCROOR ROLNO COUET.CNT. WNa31014 ODD -OWE M DN30TCD OVTI IC ON -°ITC COLD CNONCV. RQCRTOTIE CTC OaLRTa1T rORNDNL INorwomoN. SOUR_ MCI NOR COLT TDMTATCC TO rONMYON(ND LEAN CONCRETE NEAT ONLY. DO NOT ATT..,, OR nV CONN:CT, THE AOIOR DDLT°AND TCMRATC TO TIE -OUNMTION RCINrORONO DIN MON-I1FT OlE1No CONCRETE PLAOMEIT. 0 1YC• 8 8.1m FOUNDATION PLAN L rlNa l BRAVO- (3)3s WI COME.. RONORCID, Lmx• c CNN OVER-IMVATEAMD RC-OWNOT 10• 000 DI10V LEAN CONCRETE NAT NT EDGE -CD EN TI ICDFOTC OOLOCNON2h NUM TONE OTC COL MCAT TOR ADM. NOMNDON. FEFIn NT 6•CN(Ai COIrtR Na PONT) s.Q®13• 0WOV ANCHOR DOLT WO WALLIS CROVOCO 0I'1100-OIOW1 ILO`, 1Ur0a4LLINOLIIDE DOUG,, IMO, RATE WA3CN0, AND ICED MAONCTCM`WCGNCTRUCTIONC. MATCVA. ACfM A110, Fy-sI KD Fu -1. KS, CODDLE NUT MO M-E TCM'LNC TRAY 03100LTC 'MTOAL OEM MV DIRECRON, bNro LW(uld Ton, MTdNAwCOR WLKIM MV WUM MCmURNNO MOLCNT II ANY DICOTION. MSMINrT tral 1. CO.TICAL LOAD CADE TOR FOUNDATION OECICN IC DtCO ON WINO LOADS 013,1, O(H0SURE'01. 0I01M0 L0000 DOt 00Y:1V1. AIRNUFW101,10N LOMC UCLD IN MCI. 'LIMO EC OV 3 AMENNA MOON LONG MC O:RMCCRCVCLLMLOAND MC CXOAATCD DASD W TIC MTCNNAIRLCTOR IN TIC REVNIOI POOR. OF 0 00311t3(TIE POSITION THAT rc0UT01N TRIG 10.11.1.1W1110 FORCES/PRIED TOTHE FOVIIMTON. • nay INICV¢or0nwecm. In1 8.1m ANTENNA FOUNDATION MYN1NWa1 1.04.0.13 MEMO 12 NO0 230 TYP 8.1m ANTENNA FOUNDATION PAD SECTION 6 NO SCALE TYP 8.1m ANTENNA ANCHOR BOLTS 3 N0 SCALE 8.1m ANTENNA FOUNDATION DESIGN LOADS OUT LUIS S2 f SSA acoustics April 29, 2015 Sandra Suskic, AIA Architect I Project Manager Sabey, Inc. 12201 Tukwila International Boulevard, Fourth Floor Seattle, Washington 98168 SSA AcousTlcs, LLP 222 ErRURIA ST, SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WA 98109 (206) 839-0819 - P RE: Satellite Dish Digital Fortress — Property Line Noise Analysis Building C, Digital Fortress 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington This letter presents the results of an environmental noise analysis conducted for the Satellite Dish addition near building C at 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of the analysis is to document the impact of the proposed satellite dish to the adjacent receiving properties. Noise levees generated by the equipment are predicted to receiving properties and compared to the exterior sound level limits established by Seattle Municipal Code. This analysis is based on the zoning permit drawings dated 3/24/2015. ZONING The project site is bounded by parking areas to the north, east and south, with commercial buildings beyond to the east. The nearest adjacent property line is to the west of the planned satellite dish location. It is our understanding that the source property lies within the City of Tukwila boundary, and the receiving property lies in the City of Burien. Per these municipalities, it is our understanding the project and adjacent properties are currently zoned as follows: • Project Site: • West: C/LI (Commercial / Light Industrial) Residential Multi -Family The following figure is a site map with the approximate site boundaries highlighted in yellow, Figure 1. SSA ACOUSTICS, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, AND VIBRATION DIGITAL FORTRESS SATELLITE ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS Figure 1 — Project Site Zoning Map PAGE 2 OF 8 SSA AcousTlcs, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, AND VIBRATION 2 <, Figure 1 — Project Site Zoning Map SSA CONSULTANT'S IN ARCHITECTURAt., ECHANI,:;AL, ENVIRONMI7N-IAL ACOUSTICS, AND Vr6RA-110N \ DIGITAL FORTRESS SATELLITE PAGE 3 OF 8 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS NOISE ORDINANCE The applicable noise ordinance is described by the City of Tukwila Ordinance 1120 — Noise Control. The City of Tukwila noise limits are based on the zoning of the source and receiving properties. The maximum permissible sound levels are provided in the following table for daytime hours. Table 1 — Exterior Sound Level Limits District of Sound Source District of Receiving Property Residential (dB(A)) (Leq) Commercial (dB(A)) (Leq) Industrial (dB(A)) (Leq) Residential 55 57 60 Commercial 57 60 65 Industrial 60 65 70 The City of Tukwila Noise Ordinance also states that between the hours of ten (10:00) p.m. and seven (7:00) a.m. during weekdays, and between the hours of ten (10:00) p.m. and nine (7:00) a.m. on weekends, the levels established above are reduced by ten (10) dB(A) where the receiving property lies within a residential district of the City. Based on the zoning of the source and receiver properties, the environmental noise limit to the nearest adjacent property line to the west is 47 dBA during night time hours. SSA ACOUSTICS, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, AND VIBRATION 7 DIGITAL FORTRESS SATELLITE PAGE 4 OF 8 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT The equipment evaluated for compliance is listed in the table below which also presents the sound power levels provided by the manufacturer. It is our understanding that the only noise produciing element of the satellite is the blower mounted to the chassis. The noise level for this blowers is presented in the table below. Table 2 — Equipment Sound Power Levels, LW (re 1 picowatt) Unit Make/Model Sound Power Level (dBA) Blower Gast R6350A-2 79* * Sound power level based on manufacturer's sound pressure level at 3 feet SSA ACOUSTICS, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, AND VIBRATION r -1 F \ DIGITAL FORTRESS SATELLITE PAGE 5 OF 8 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS METHODS Equipment noise was predicted to the nearest neighboring property lines based on a point source noise propagation model, the point is defined as the center of the unit. Methods employed followed those described by the Air -Conditioning & Refrigeration Institute (ARI) Standard 275 and ASHRAE Applications Handbook. The receiving property points that were used for all equipment calculations are shown in Figure 2 below with an arrow. Receiver I: Receiver Description: Zoning: Noise Limit: r N -+ West Property Undeveloped Forest Multifamily Residential 47 dB(A) Figure 2 — Receiver Location WEST RECEIVING PROPERTY UMW POLE 1l413Lfn0&IL0 ca cAi.ECREr,O YSOOR EQUAUR i SSA ACOUSTICS, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, AND VIBRATION DIGITAL FORTRESS SATELLITE ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS RESULTS PAGE 6 OF 8 Noise levels from the proposed equipment have been predicted to the following adjacent properties. The calculations have been optimized to sum adjacent equipment to a single point source. The following tables provide results of our predictions to the nearest properties. West Receiving Property — Industrial Table 3 — Mechanical Equipment Noise Levels: Combined at West Property Line Mechanical Equipment Noise Transmission to West Property Line Source LwA Loss/Distance(ft) Barrier Loss Additional Losses dB(A) 1 Satellite Fan 79 -33 (60') 0 0 46 Combined LP at Property Line {dBA) 46 As shown in Table 3, the sound pressure level from the equipment without mitigation meets the exterior sound level goal of 47 dB(A). SSA ACOUSTICS, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, AND VIBRATION DIGITAL FORTRESS SATELLITE PAGE 7 OF 8 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS SUMMARY This letter shows that the environmental noise from the mechanical equipment at the Digital Fortress Satellite Addition meets the City of Tukwila noise ordinance. This document has provided our environmental noise analysis to the nearest receiving properties from the proposed units at 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard in Tukwila, Washington. Should there be questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, SSA ACOUSTICS, LLP ,cam a_cutk-t, Matt Roe ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT SSA ACOUSTICS, I_LP 222 Etruria St, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 839-0819 — P (206) 839-0824 — F Mohamed Ait Allaoua MANAGING PARTNER & SENIOR ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT SSA ACousTlcs, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, AND VIBRATION DIGITAL FORTRESS SATELLITE PAGE 8 OF 8 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS. Appendix A. Descriptors To better understand this report we present a brief overview regarding sound properties, descriptors and terms. dBA Mechanical noise is often measured as an A -weighted sound level in units of decibels, symbolized as dBA. The A -weighting is a specific weighting filter in a sound level meter that corresponds approximately to the sensitivity of human hearing at the various frequencies. Sound levels vary significantly depending on location and activities. People normally experience sound levels between about 30 and 90 dB(A), depending on their activity. For example, a nearby noisy vehicle, radio or power tool may produce 90 dB(A); normal conversation is about 55 to 65 dB(A); and a bedroom or quiet office is about 30 to 40 dB(A). The table below approximates human sensitivity to changes in sound level. Table 4 — Changes in Sound Level Change in Sound Level (dB) Change in Apparent Loudness 1 Imperceptible (except for tones) 3 Just barely perceptible 6 Clearly noticeable 10 About twice (or half) as loud 20 About 4 times (or one -forth) as loud SSA ACOUSTICS, LLP CONSULTANTS IN ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, ENVIIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS, ANO VIBRATION TUKWILA HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Applicant: File Number: Application: Owner: Location: SEPA Determination: Comprehensive Plan/ Zoning Designation: Recommendation: Public Hearing: Exhibits: Sabey Corporation by Sandra Suskic L15-0016 The request is for approval of a Type 3 Wireless Communication Facility, consisting of an 8.1 meter antenna. Sabey Corporation 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard, Building C. Exempt from SEPA determination Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI) adjacent to Department of Community Development recommends approval. The Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the application on May 21, 2015 at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA. The following exhibits were entered into the record: 1. Department's staff report with Attachments A-D Attachment A: Attachment B: Attachment C: Attachment D: Vicinity map Graphic simulations of the proposed tower Plan set Satellite Dish Digital Fortress — noise analysis Introduction The applicant, Sabey Corporation, seeks approval of a Type 3 Wireless Communication Facility. A hearing was held on May 21, 2015, at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA. Represented at the hearing were: the Department, by Valerie Lonneman, Assistant Planner, and Minnie Dhaliwal, r Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey Corporation Wireless Application Page 2 of 6 Senior Planner; and the applicant, Sabey Corporation, by Sandra Suskic, project architect, and representatives of Hughes Network and Digital Fortress. All references to TMC or Code refer to the Tukwila Municipal Code. After due consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, the following shall constitute the findings of fact, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner on this application. Findings of Fact 1. The site is located addressed as 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard, and is on the surface parking area for an existing office park campus, the Intergate West Campus. The site is served by Tukwila International Boulevard which is located north of the site. The property is located on the western border of Tukwila, adjacent to Burien; a wooded buffer area separates the site from an apartment complex. 2. The property is zoned Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI). 3. The applicant proposes installation of an 8.1-meter tall antenna in the parking area adjacent to building C at the Intergate West Campus. The proposed antenna would be ground -mounted, and is depicted in the simulations shown in Attachment B to the staff report. 4. The proposed antenna is one of 17 new "gateway" locations for antennas that will support the new "EchoStar 19/Jupiter II satellite. The gateways must be separated from each other by at least 350-400 miles, and located in areas of limited precipitation. The antenna must also be within 115 meters of the supporting indoor equipment, and must have a "free and clear look" angle of 147 degrees. 5. The Digital Fortress (DF) facility in Building C currently supports a gateway from Spaceway Satellite, consisting of two 3.5-meter antennas and eight racks of indoor baseband equipment. The EchoStar/Jupiter II satellite requires an antenna in an area close to the existing DF facility, and the applicant would utilize DF support services and infrastructure for the proposed antenna. 6. The Department has reviewed the application and recommends approval. 7. No public comments were submitted to the Department or the Hearing Examiner on this application. 8. TMC 18.58.050.0 sets out the following order of preference for location of new wireless communication facilities: 1. Place antennas on existing structures, such as buildings, towers, water towers, or electrical transmission towers. \ / \ Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey CorporationWireless Application Page 3 of 6 2. Place wireless communication facilities in nonresidentially-zoned districts and nonresidential property. 3. Place antennas and towers on public property and on appropriate rights -of -way if practical, provided that no obligation is created herein for the City to allow the use of City property or public right-of-way for this purpose. 4. City Property/Public Rights -of -Way. The placement of personal wireless communication facilities on City -owned property and public rights -of -way will be subject to other applicable sections of the Tukwila Municipal Code and review by other departments (i.e., Public Works, Parks and Recreation, etc.). 9. TMC 18.58.060 provides that: A. New towers are not permitted within the City unless the Hearing Examiner finds that the applicant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that: 1. Coverage objective —There exists an actual (not theoretical) significant gap in service, and the proposed wireless communication facility will eliminate such significant gap in service; and 2. Alternates — No existing tower or structure, or other feasible site or other alternative technologies not requiring a new tower in the City, can accommodate the applicant's proposed wireless communication facility; and 3. Least intrusive: The proposed new wireless communication facility is designed and located to remove the significant gap in service in a manner that is, in consideration of the values, objectives and regulations set forth in this chapter, TMC Title 18, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the least intrusive upon the surrounding area. B. The Hearing Examiner shall be the reviewing body on the application to construct a new tower, and shall determine whether or not each of the above requirements are met. Examples of evidence demonstrating the foregoing requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. That the tower height is the minimum necessary in order to achieve the coverage objective; 2. That no existing towers or structures or alternative sites are located within the geographic area required to meet the applicant's engineering requirements to meet its coverage objective (regardless of the geographical boundaries of the City); 3. That existing towers or structures are not of a sufficient height or could not feasibly be extended to a sufficient height to meet the applicant's engineering requirements to meet its coverage objective; r Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey Corporation Wireless Application Page 4 of 6 4. That existing structures or towers do not have sufficient structural strength to support the applicant's proposed antenna and ancillary facilities; 5. That the applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna; 6. That the fees, costs or contractual provisions required by the owner or operator in order to share an existing tower or structure, or to locate at an alternative site, or to adapt an existing tower or structure or alternative site for sharing, are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower construction by 25% are presumed to be unreasonable; 7. That an alternative technology that does not require the use of a new tower, such as a cable microcell network using multiple low powered transmitters/receivers attached to a wireline system, is unsuitable. Costs of alternative technology that exceed new tower or antenna development shall not be presumed to render the technology unsuitable; and 8. The applicant demonstrates other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures or other sites or alternative technologies unsuitable. All engineering and technological evidence must be provided and certified by a registered and qualified professional engineer and clearly demonstrate the evidence required. C. The Hearing Examiner, after holding a public hearing, shall either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, or remand the application back to staff for further investigation in a manner consistent with the Hearing Examiner order. Conclusions 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this application pursuant to Chapter 18.58 TMC. Under the Code, an application for a new wireless communication facility tower requires a Type 3 permit, with approval by the Hearing Examiner. 2. The May 1, 2015 DCD staff report is adopted by reference herein. 3. The proposed new freestanding antenna is consistent with the order of preference in TMC 18.58.050.C. There are no existing structures that would be within 377 feet of interior equipment and in full view of a geosynchronous domestic satellite. The site is located in the CL/I zone, a non-residential district. Placement of the antenna on public property or a public right-of-way would not be possible, given the project's need to have specialized supportive services in close proximity and a specific view angle of a geosynchronous domestic satellite. The site is not designated as landmark or historic district. -- Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey CorporationWireless Application Page 5 of 6 4. New wireless towers must also meet the criteria of TMC 18.58.060.A. TMC 18.58.060.B lists examples of evidence that show that the criteria of subsection A are met. 5. The proposal would meet TMC 18.58.060.A.1, since there is an actual and significant gap in service, which would be eliminated by the proposed antenna. Furthermore, the antenna height of 8.1 meters (33.5 feet) and overall size are the minimum necessary in order to achieve the coverage objective, i.e., the amount of bandwidth to be supported by this gateway. 6. TMC 18.58.060.A.2 is met. The EchoStar 19/Jupiter II satellite which is to be served by the antenna requires individual antennas that will point uniquely to the satellite, a requirement that constrains the location of the antenna. The need for supportive services and indoor equipment within 115 meters of the antenna further restricts the location of the proposal. There are no existing towers or structures that could meet the engineering requirements of the applicant's coverage objective. The antenna cannot be placed on the rooftop of the building near the identified site, as the size and structural weight bearing limits for the rooftop cannot be met. Co -location is not feasible in light of the engineering requirements, and there is no alternative technology that would avoid the need for a satellite antenna. Although the proposed antenna was not shown to cause interference with antenna on other existing towers or structures, or vice versa, the engineering requirements for the coverage objective do not allow theuse of existing towers or structures. 7. TMC 18.58.060.A3 is also met. The proposed antenna would be the least intrusive upon the surrounding area. The antenna would be located in a private parking area serving adjacent commercial development, with limited visibility from roads or the surrounding residential areas. The proposed height is below the height limit in the zone, and proposal complies with design standards for wireless communication facilities. 8. The proposal would meet the general requirements of TMC 18.58.070 and TMC 18.58.130, and would be consistent with adopted City plans and regulations. 9. The application would meet all applicable criteria for a Type 3 new wireless communication facility tower, and should be approved. Decision The application for a Type 3 Wireless Communication Facility is hereby approved. Entered this 28th day of May, 2015. Anne Watanabe Hearing Examiner Hearing Examiner Decision L15-0016 Sabey Corporation Wireless Application Page 6 of 6 Informational Items: 1. A City of Tukwila building permit is required for the proposed tower. An electrical permit is required for any electrical work. 2. TMC 18.58.180 provides: Expiration. Any application to install or operate a wireless communications facility shall expire exactly one year from the date of issuance of the application unless significant progress has been made to construct the facility. The City may extend the expiration period by up to one additional year due to circumstances outside of the control of the applicant. However, the City shall not issue an extension if any revisions have occurred to the City's Zoning Code which would affect the wireless communication facility approved application. Concerning Further Review TMC 18.108.030.0 provides that "The decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be final and shall be appealable only to Superior Court pursuant to RCW 36.70C." BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that on this date I sent true and correct copies of the attached Findings and Decision to each person listed below, or on the attached mailing list, in the matter of Sabey Corporation, Hearing Examiner file: L15- 0016 in the manner indicated. Party Method of Service Valerie Lonneman Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Valerie.Lonneman@Tukwila@WA.gov Minnie Dhaliwal Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov 1/ U.S. First Class Mail, postage prepaid ❑ Inter -office Mail 0 E-mail ❑ Fax ❑ Hand Delivery ❑ Legal Messenger Dated: May 28, 2015 • Tiffany Ku Legal Assistant On the toolbar»View»toolbars»Forms.' ) see this ` abi ', ®` Case Name Property Address 12101 Tukwila International Blvd click the lock icon to lock for fill-in. Sabey Corp Application for Approval of Type III Wireless Communication Facility (L15-0016) Hearing Examiner Assigned: ❑ Sue Tanner ® Anne Watanabe ['Other Dept. Contacts Notified By: Date Notified: Filing Fee: $ (check #: Appeal Information (Please go to the appeal type and fill in all fields) ❑ CITATION ENFORCEMENT Citation / H.E. File #: Date Received: Violation Type: Select Type Select Type ❑ SDOT or DPD ❑ ❑ Contested or Mitigation ❑ ❑ Fine Paid/No Hearing $ Date ❑ Default/No Hearing $ Date ❑ MASTER USE PERMIT See Types H.E. File #: Date Received: Dept. Ref. #: ® OTHER TYPE OF APPEAL : Click to Designate H.E. File #: L15-0016 Date Received: 5/6/2015 Dept. Ref. #: Party Contacts: Department Name: Valerie Lonneman Email: Valerie.Lonneman@tukwilawa.gov Address: 6300 Southcenter Blvd Phone: (206) 433-7140 Tukwila , WA 98188 Fax: ( ) Applicant Name: Sandra Suskic, Sabey Corporation Email: Address: 12201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4'h Floor Phone: ( ) Tukwila , WA 98168 Fax: ( ) Select Party Name: Email: Address: Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) Select Party Name: Email: Address: Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) Select Party Name: Email: Address: Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) Select Party Name: Email: Address: Phone: ( ) Fax: ( ) Please Note all Dates and Milestones Below Continuance 1: Continuance 2: Decision Issued: Pre Hearing Conf.: Hearing: May 21st, 2015 at 9:00 AM Continuance 3: Record Closed: Date NOTES and MILESTONES Initial Cite of Department Of Community AFFIDAVIT OF J u;F'u a Development DISTRIBUTION I, Valerie Lonneman, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action X Hearing Examiner Findings Other: Notice of Completion Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 28 day of May, 2015 Project Name: Digital Fortress Satellite Antenna Project Number: L15-0016 Associated File Number (s): PL15-0013 Mailing requested b : Valerie Lonneman _ Mailer's signature: W:\USERS\VALERIE\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC John Ford Sandra Suskic JohnF@Sabey.com SandraS@Sabey.com W:\USERS\VALERIE\AFFIIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC 7 -\ et of J u11wita Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action x Hearing Examiner Findings Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this day of 20 Project Name: Sabey, Type III Wireless Project Number: PL15-0013 Associated File Number (s): L15-0016 Mailing requested by: Valerie Lonneman Mailer's signature: // ,,-)‘'/C--, C�g------ W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Teri Svedahl From: Valerie Lonneman Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 5:12 PM To: Teri Svedahl Subject: L15-0016 NOD Attachments: L15-0016 HE Findings 5 28 15.pdf; L15-0016 NOD Type 3 WCF.pdf Teri, will you please send the attached NOD to the following: King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Thanks, Valerie Lonneman Assistant Planner, City of Tukwila 1630o Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila WA 98188 206.433.7140 I Valerie.Lonneman@TukwilaWA.gov Tukwila: The City of opportunity, the community of choice. t 1 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Dire 014 April 14, 2015 John Ford SABEY Data Center 12101 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor Tukwila WA 98168 RE: Notice of Application — Wireless Telecommunication Facility File# PL15-0013, L15-0016 Digital Fortress Satellite Antenna Dear John Ford: There is a fee due on your permit application in the amount of $217.00 to cover fees associated with mailing the attached public notice - Notice of Application, Wireless Telecommunication Facility. The number of required notices sent for your application was 217 which included property owners and tenants within 500 feet of your project site as well as interested parties and agencies with jurisdiction. The cost is based on the land use fee schedule adopted by Resolution Number 1845 covering Public Notice mailings required for your application. This fee covers the attached notice only. Additional fees may be assessed for future mailings or other review tasks per the fee schedule. This amount needs to be paid before the city can continue processing your permit application. The payment may be paid by cash, check or credit card. The city will accept credit card payments by phone. If paying by check please send the check made out to: City of Tukwila Attn: Teri 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at Teri.Svedahl@TukwilaWA.gov Sincerely, Teri Svedahl Administrative Support Technician Cc; Valerie Lonneman, City Planner MD Invoicing Public Mailings.doc Page 1 of 1 04/13/2015 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 at* of J u:Fm& Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Teri Svedahl , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: x Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _13th day of _April 2015 Project Name: Digital Fortress - Satellite Antenna Project Number: PL15-0013 Associated File Number (s): L15-0016 Mailing requested by: Valer o iceman Mailer's signature: /""ite. W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES-FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC t, f City of Tukwila Notice Of Application —Wireless Telecommunication Facility Digital Fortress —Satellite Antenna Structure File #: L15-0016 Project Description: Installation of a ground mounted 8.1 meter antenna at the Intergate West Campus Building C (adjacent to the building on the westerly side of property). Location is hidden from view when traveling on Tukwila International Boulevard. Project Applicant: John Ford, Sabey Data Center Project Planner: Valerie Lonneman 206.433.7140 or Valerie.Lonneman@TukwilaWa.gov Your written comments on the project are requested and can be delivered to 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100, Tukwila, WA 98188. Comments must be received by 5:OOp.m. on April 29, 2015. A public hearing is also scheduled on May 21, 2015 at 9:00 am at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Ste 100, Conference Room #1. You may request a copy of any decision, comment on the project, and learn your appeal rights by calling the project planner listed above, or by visiting our offices Monday through Friday, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm at 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Ste 100. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Jim Haggerton, Mayor You are receiving this notice because you are a property owner or tenant within 500ft of this project CA 5 Dbi CQ. First name Canhtan Troy & Angela Don W & Julie M Patricia E Ezra & Veronika Walter D & Cornelius A Dee W & Jennie Beverly Ty Patrick & Jessica Residential * * INTERGATE INTERGATE INTERGATE INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY WEST STEINMAN MERLE SHERLOCK GREGORY HOWARD INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY WEST SABEY CORPORATION last name Ta Schmeil Kubley Hudson Joseph Hudson Gaston Treddenbarger Treddenbarger Norton CASCADE AFFORDABLE HOUSING Allied SABEY CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY EAST LLC WEST BLDG A EAST BLDG 3 EAST BLDG 2 Address 6007 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY 16834 SE 43RD ST 12041 28TH AVE S 2652 122ND ST 6016 S ROXBURY ST 2643 S 122ND ST 2653 S 122ND ST 12238 MILITARY RD S PO BOX 69193 2644 S 123RD ST 433 E LAS COLINAS BLVD # 980 221 WELLS AVE S STE 100 4TH FLOOR 12201 TUKWILA INTL BLVD 4TH FLR 12301 TUKWILA INTL BLVD 3333 S 120th PL 3311 S 120th PL 12001 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 2805 S 125TH ST 12437 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 12101 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 3333 S 120TH PL City St SEATTLE WA BELLEVUE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA IRVING TX RENTON WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA BURIEN WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA Zip 98118 98006 98168 98168 98118 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 75039 98057 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 1 agency OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY DEPT OF ECOLOGY VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WASTE MANAGEMENT CITY OF BURIEN MUCKLESHOOT Cultural Resources Program MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program MUCKLESHOOT Wildlife Program DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE dept NW REGIONAL OFFICE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Laura Murphy Karen Walter Mike Middleton address PO BOX 48343 3190 160th AVE SE PO BOX 69550 12606 1st AVE S 8111-1st AVE S 415 SW 150th 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 4705 W MARGINAL WAY SW city st zip OLYMPIA WA 98504 BELLEVUE WA 98008 SEATTLE WA 98168 SEATTLE WA 98168 SEATTLE WA 98108 BURIEN WA 98166 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 SEATTLE WA 98106 NAME ADDRESS STREET BLDG APT # CITY ST ZIP WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12400 28th AVE S OFFICE * SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12352 28th AVE S BLDG A # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12352 28th AVE S BLDG A # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12352 28th AVE S BLDG A # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12352 28th AVE S BLDG A # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12352 28th AVE S BLDG A # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12352 28th AVE S BLDG A # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12354 28th AVE S BLDG B # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12354 28th AVE S BLDG B # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12354 28th AVE S BLDG B # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12354 28th AVE S BLDG B # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12354 28th AVE S BLDG B # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12354 28th AVE S BLDG B # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12356 28th AVE S BLDG C # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12356 28th AVE S BLDG C # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12356 28th AVE S BLDG C # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12356 28th AVE S BLDG C # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12356 28th AVE S BLDG C # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12356 28th AVE S BLDG C # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12358 28th AVE S BLDG D # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12358 28th AVE S BLDG D # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12358 28th AVE S BLDG D # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12358 28th AVE S BLDG D # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12358 28th AVE S BLDG D # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12358 28th AVE S BLDG D # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12360 28th AVE S BLDG E # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12360 28th AVE S BLDG E # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12360 28th AVE S BLDG E # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12360 28th AVE S BLDG E # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12360 28th AVE S BLDG E # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12360 28th AVE 5 BLDG E # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12300 28th AVE S BLDG F # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12300 28th AVE S BLDG F # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 vES WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12300 28th AVE S BLDG F # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12300 28th AVE S BLDG F # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12300 28th AVE S BLDG F # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12300 28th AVE S BLDG F # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12302 28th AVE S BLDG G # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12302 28th AVE S BLDG G # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12302 28th AVE S BLDG G # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12302 28th AVE S BLDG G # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12302 28th AVE S BLDG G # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12302 28th AVE S BLDG G # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12304 28th AVE S BLDG H # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12304 28th AVE S BLDG H # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12304 28th AVE S BLDG H # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12304 28th AVE S BLDG H # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12304 28th AVE S BLDG H # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12304 28th AVE S BLDG H # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12306 28th AVE S BLDG J # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12308 28th AVE S BLDG K # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12308 28th AVE S BLDG K # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12308 28th AVE S BLDG K # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12308 28th AVE S BLDG K # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12308 28th AVE S BLDG K # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12200 28th AVE S BLDG L # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12200 28th AVE S BLDG L # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12200 28th AVE S BLDG L # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12200 28th AVE S BLDG L # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12200 28th AVE S BLDG L # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12200 28th AVE S BLDG L # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12202 28th AVE S BLDG M # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12202 28th AVE S BLDG M # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12202 28th AVE S BLDG M # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12202 28th AVE S BLDG M # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12202 28th AVE S BLDG M # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12202 28th AVE S BLDG M # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12204 28th AVE S BLDG N # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12204 28th AVE S BLDG N # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12204 28th AVE S BLDG N # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12204 28th AVE S BLDG N # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12204 28th AVE S BLDG N # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12204 28th AVE S BLDG N # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12206 28th AVE S BLDG 0 # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12206 28th AVE S BLDG 0 # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12206 28th AVE S BLDG 0 # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12206 28th AVE S BLDG 0 # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12206 28th AVE S BLDG 0 # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12206 28th AVE S BLDG 0 # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12208 28th AVE S BLDG P # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12208 28th AVE S BLDG P # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12208 28th AVE S BLDG P # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12208 28th AVE S BLDG P # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12208 28th AVE S BLDG P # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12208 28th AVE S BLDG P # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12110 28th AVE S BLDG Q # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12110 28th AVE S BLDG Q # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12110 28th AVE S BLDG Q # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12110 28th AVE S BLDG Q # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12110 28th AVE S BLDG Q # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12110 28th AVE S BLDG Q # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12112 28th AVE S BLDG R # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12112 28th AVE S BLDG R # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12112 28th AVE S BLDG R # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12112 28th AVE S BLDG R # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12112 28th AVE S BLDG R # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12112 28th AVE S BLDG R # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12114 28th AVE S BLDG S # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12114 28th AVE S BLDG S # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12114 28th AVE S BLDG S # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER 12114 28th AVE S BLDG S # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER 12114 28th AVE S BLDG S # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 12114 28th AVE S BLDG S # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 12116 28th AVE 5 BLDG T # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 12116 28th AVE S BLDG T # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 12116 28th AVE S BLDG T # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 12116 28th AVE S BLDG T # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 12116 28th AVE S BLDG T # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 12116 28th AVE S BLDG T # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 12118 28th AVE S BLDG U # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 12118 28th AVE S BLDG U # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 12118 28th AVE S BLDG U # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 12118 28th AVE S BLDG U # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 12118 28th AVE S BLDG U # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 12118 28th AVE S BLDG U # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 1 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 2 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 3 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 4 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 5 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 12 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 13 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 14 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 15 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 22 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 23 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 24 SEATTLE WA 98168 12460 28th AVE S * # 25 SEATTLE WA 98168 12450 28th AVE S * # 6 SEATTLE WA 98168 12450 28th AVE S * # 7 SEATTLE WA 98168 12450 28th AVE S * # 8 SEATTLE WA 98168 12450 28th AVE S * # 9 SEATTLE WA 98168 12450 28th AVE S * # 10 SEATTLE WA 98168 12450 28th AVE S * # 11 SEATTLE WA 98168 12450 28th AVE S * # 16 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER 12450 28th AVE S 12450 28th AVE S 12450 28th AVE S 12450 28th AVE S 12450 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12410 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12420 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # 17 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 18 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 19 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 20 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 21 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 31 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 32 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 33 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 34 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 35 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 36 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 41 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 42 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 43 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 44 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 45 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 46 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 26 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 27 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 28 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 29 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 30 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 37 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 38 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 39 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 40 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 47 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 48 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 49 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 50 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 51 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 52 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 53 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 54 SEATTLE WA 98168 WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT WOODRIDGE APT COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER COMMUNITY MEMBER 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12430 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S 12440 28th AVE S * * * * * * * * * * * * # 55 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 61 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 62 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 63 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 64 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 65 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 56 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 57 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 58 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 59 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 60 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 66 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 67 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 68 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 69 SEATTLE WA 98168 # 70 SEATTLE WA 98168 i 2015-04-02 20:57 Woodridge ,irk Apts 1 >% . 7 P 1/1 • WOODRIDGE PARK APARTMENTS OFFICE 12400 28TEI AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA 98168 APTS. 1-5 & 12-15 & 22-25 6-11 & 16-21 31-36 & 41-46.5 26-30 & 3740 & 47-50 51-55 & 61-65 & 71-75 56-60 & 66-70 & 76-80 A BLDG 12352 B BLDG 12354 C BLDG 12356. D BLDG 12358 E BLDG 12360 F BLDG 12300 G BLDG 12302 H BLDG 12304 J BLDG 12306 E BLDG 12308 L BLDG M BLDG. N BLDG 0 BLDG P BLDG Q BLDG R BLDG S BLDG T BLDG U BLDG CORPORATE: 425-226-5150 AFTER HOURS: 425-226-4959 FAX #: 425-226-6998 12460 12450 1241,0 12420 12430 12440 12200 12202 12204 12206 12208 12110 12112 ' 12114 12116 12118 l2W2y TN c 5E 4 c OF �iif [ r. ; 7Oa au 1 ►", 6Fr�ls c Oar Fl 4'l A'5— ,�.�;.,µµ City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION April 2, 2015 John Ford, Vice President Sabey Data Center Properties 12201 Tukwila International Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98168 jonf@sabey.com Subject: Type 3 Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, Digital Fortress — Satellite Antenna Project A15-0016 Dear Mr. Ford: Your application for a Wireless Telecommunication Facility is considered complete on April 2, 2015 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 433-7140. Sincerely, Valerie Lonneman Assistant Planner W:\Users\Valerie\L.etter of Completeness Page 1 of 1 4/2/2015 2:09 PM r\ 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development APR 012015 ti;r�vvILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number L15-0016 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works Fire Dept. ❑I Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: Digital Fortress — Satelite Antenna Project Address: 12101 Tukwila International Blvd — Westerly side of Building C Date transmitted: 4/1/2015 Response requested by: 4/15/2015 Staff coordinator: Valerie Lonneman (x1116) Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) (Pue,cic. (V it.tcc I-1 A/ : n4 v►�' N i _� Plan check date: Comments prepared by: Update date: f f \ 0400 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L15-0016 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ¶ jt, Building Planning I❑I Public Works I❑I Fire Dept. 1❑1 Police Dept. I❑I Parks/Rec Project: Digital Fortress — Satelite Antenna Project Address: 12101 Tukwila International Blvd — Westerly side of Building C Date transmitted: 4/1/2015 Response requested by: 4/15/2015 Staff coordinator: Valerie Lonneman (x1116) Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted devellopment regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) C yr 7 / /ra Plan check date: 7--2 /s5 Comments Update date: �" prepared by: Rod Butler From: Rod Butler Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 10:20 AM To: 'Dan.Shoemaker@faa.gov' Subject: RE: Sabey Corp - Tukwila WA - Satellite Antenna Project Da n, Ignore my last email. I when online and followed your instructions and received the following ASN number — 2015-ASN- 266-0E From: Dan.Shoemaker@faa.gov [mailto:Dan.Shoemaker@faa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:16 PM To: Rod Butler Subject: RE: Sabey Corp - Tukwila WA - Satellite Antenna Project Rod, Sorry for the really late reply. Somehow, your e-mail fell through the cracks. My apologies. To file your aeronautical study online, once again you'll go to our website, https://oeaaa.faa.gov. You'll first need to create an account by clicking on the "New User Registration" link about a third of the way down the left side of the page (if you don't have an account already). Once you get an account set up and you're logged in, you'll be taken to your portal page. In the center column of the page, under the heading "Off Airport Construction," click on the "Add New Case (Off Airport)" link. The first time you do this, you will be asked to fill in sponsor information.. This will largely be a repeat of the info you filled in when you registered. After you fill in this information the first time, it will then become a drop - down menu for your next filing. Once you've submitted your sponsor information, you'll be taken to the online Form 7460-1. You can ignore several boxes, such as "State Filing" and "Audio Visual Warning System." Since yours are proposed structures, you'll select "Construction" under the "Notice of" header, and "Permanent" under the "Duration" header. The coordinates need to be filed in degrees -minutes -seconds -hundredths of seconds format. Since there's no choice for "Satellite Antenna" in the dropdown menu, so I would choose "Other w/Antenna," since it's an odd shape that doesn't really meet the standard for being called an "Antenna Tower." You can put any name you like under "Structure Name." I would suggest calling it "Satellite Antenna," along with any technical nomenclature you might use. Once you've filled everything in, check the certification box at the bottom of the page and click "Save." You'll then be taken to a page where you'll be asked to verify the location on a map. Click on the "Verify Map" link, and if the location looks about right on the (admittedly old) topographical map, click on the "Verify Map" button beneath the map (you may have to maximize the window or scroll down within the window to see the button. You'll then be given an Aeronautical Study Number, which will look something like this: 2015-ANM-####-OE. This is the number you'll reference any time you have a question about the study or you request a progress report. Let me know if you have any questions or need someone to walk you through the filing process. I'm happy to help. Dan Dan Shoemaker Airspace Specialist Seattle Obstruction Evaluation Group Office Phone: (425) 227-2791 1 SAB EY Architecture March 25, 2015 Site adress: Intergate West — Building C 12101 Tukwila International Blvd. Seattle , 98168 Project: Digital Fortress , Proposed Jupiter II Antenna Structure 8.1 meter Zoning: Commercial/ Light Industrial Project Description Sabey Corporation is proposing the installation of an 8.1 meter antenna at our Intergate West campus Building C. The proposed location will be on the westerly side of the property, adjacent to Building C. Antenna will be located in a fenced secured antenna yard that will be monitored. The location is hidden from view when traveling on Tukwila International Blvd. Antenna need to be located within 377 feet of interior equipment and full view of geosynchronous domestic satellite. These two parameters were primary driver for the exact antenna position. The antenna will be ground mounted on cast in place reinforced concrete foundations. A modular block retaining wall will be constructed to support the cut into the adjacent slope. Refer to Geotechnical and Structural drawings and report submitted. Wireless communication requirements: 18.58.070.General requirements for Wireless Communication Facilities: Noise: There will be no generators on the site as part of this submittal. The satellite dish assembly will have one piece of equipment" The reflector" that produces noise. The reflector (fan) keeps the receiving element dry during the inclement weather. Small fan/blower, maximum produced noise level is 72/69 dB(A). Specification information sheet is provided. The blower is used occasionally. Doti el rf Pr ring i'fi..1t1Ct e3 Re e,'".q Praterty Res_derdi Datine Revert•=�, CVIIIIISItot [trl A Vahrtt-.a Retie -die 55 dB(A) 45 dB%) P 57 d!,A) 60 diM) cmrtercia: 57 dB(A) 47 dB 4) 60 di3(A) IS dB A) Indr>trlat 60 dB(A,, 5O dB:A) 65 dB;A) 70 dB(A) The Satellite dish will be placed in the back of the property for multiple reasons. The noise generated by the fan will be minor and will be produced occasionally, during inclement weather. It is not a continuous noise. Business license requirement: Company "Digital Fortress" based on Intergate West campus will operate this wireless telecommunication facility. Their business number is: BUS-0100848 Signage: Only necessary safety signage will be placed on site. Page 1 of 4 SABEY CONSTRUCTION 112201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor I Seattle, Washington 98168-5121 206.281.8700 main 206.281.0920 fax I sabeydatacenters.com REcEivEn SABEY Architecture Parking: Total of 7 parking stalls will be demolished to accommodate the wireless antenna on the site. The Intergate West site has very low parking demand due to the nature of Data center use. It has more than 260 stalls than what is required on the entire site. We see no issues with parking in general. Finish: The tower finish will be all galvanized steel, with a reflector made of steel and some aluminum. The antenna base is galvanized steel in color. The antenna dish and reflector are painted white with some galvanized steel unpainted. All painted pieces will match general IGW campus standard colors. Design: The Satellite dish is placed in the back of the property, hidden from the street view. It is partially cut in into the hill side. The hill side is providing visual and sound buffer to the residential area. ys Pin Page 2 of 4 SABEY CONSTRUCTION 112201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor I Seattle, Washington 98168-5121 206.281.8700 main 1206.281.0920 fax I sabeydatacenters.com SBEY Architecture Color: Paint , where needed will be selected to further diminish contrast with the background foliage. It will be a standard IGW campus/building colors. Refer to the above photo for a reference. . Lighting: It is necessary to provide basic lighting for maintenance and security reasons. The proposed (lighting will be attached to 20'high pole, in two opposite corners. Refer to the site drawing for exact positions. Advertising: No advertising proposed as part of this project. Equipment enclosure: We are not proposing to enclose the satellite antenna. Antenna will be located in a chain link fenced secured antenna yard. 18.58.130. Tower- Specific Development Standards Height: The Satellite dish height is 33.5'. The proposed antenna height is bellow the maximum height requirement for the C/LI zoning. Page 3 of 4 SABEY CONSTRUCTION I.12201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor I Seattle, Washington 98168-5121 206.281.8700 main 1206.281.0920 fax I sabeydatacenters.com Sft3EY Architecture Antenna and tower esthetics The Satellite dish is placed in the back of the property and is partially cut into the hillside, thereby minimizing its profile and visual impact from the street. Paint will be selected to further diminish contrast with the background foliage. The impact from the east is essentially non-existent. The dish is well below the line of sight of the neighbors. The hill also is an effective buffer to the occasional minor noise generated by a small fan that operates during inclement weather. The hill side is providing visual and sound buffer to the residential area. The antenna will be located in a chain link -fenced secured antenna yard. Enclosing the entire yard area for the antenna height would add unnecessary bulk and scale, thereby making the structure visually intrusive. The proposed plan is better from a visual aesthetic, security and environmental standpoint. Setbacks: The fence for satellite antenna yard is located 33'-3" from the boundary. It is more than the minimum setback requirement by the zone C/LI. Color The color where needed, will be neutral beige, standard IGW , to match the main beige building color. Feed lines and coaxial cables All feed lines and cables will be located within the tower. The tower will have an in ground cable connection to indoor equipment area. The antenna will be connected to existing generator on site. Sincerely, SABEY ARCHITECTURE Sandra Suskic Project Manager Page 4 of 4 SABEY CONSTRUCTION 112201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor I Seattle, Washington 98168-5121 206.281.8700 main 1206.281.0920 fax I sabeydatacenters.com SI' BEY Architecture March 25, 2015 Site adress: Intergate West — Building C 12101 Tukwila International Blvd. Seattle , 98168 Project: Digital Fortress , Proposed Jupiter II Antenna Structure 8.1 meter Zoning: Commercial/ Light Industrial 18.58.060 . New towers Hughes Network Systems will launch a new satellite in 2016, EchoStar 19/Jupiter II which will require 17 new gateway locations in the United States all of which are west of the Mississippi. The DF site in Seattle will be one of the 17 new gateways. The EchoStar 19/Jupiter II satellite will augment the capabilities of the very successful Spaceway and Jupiter 1 satellites to provide broadband service and coverage across the entire continental United States. This will more than double the capacity in the eastern half of the US and west coast and provide additional coverage in the mountain states. The Seattle gateway includes (1) 8.1M antenna and up to 6 racks of indoor baseband equipment. Coverage: The Digital Fortress (DF) facility currently supports a gateway from Spaceway Satellite which consist of (2) 3.5M antennas and 8 racks of indoor baseband equipment. DF has provide hosting for this equipment for the past 5-years and our agreement with them was recently renewed for this gateway until December 31, 2020. This site was chosen based in part on the fact that it is currently a Spaceway site, has the necessary mission critical infrastructure in place, i.e., UPS, generators, 24x 7 operations, and multiple fiber providers, and is located in a region of the country which, along with the other 16 gateway sites, provides good availability and does not interfere with user traffic on the satellite. Alternates: The existing (2) 3.5M antennas currently at this site support a separate and stand-alone satellite (Spaceway) and are not able to be used in conjunction with the new EchoStar 19/Jupiter 11 satellite, thus presenting the need for the additional antenna. Each satellite requires antennas that point uniquely to that satellite. The 17 new gateway locations must be separated from each other by at least 350-400 miles and must all be in the western half of the US and Canada. These constraints force the proposed site to be in western Washington State. Least intrusive: The Jupiter-2 satellite has antennas that point to a very specific area at or very close to the DF facility. Since there is already infrastructure and manpower in place at DF, it is the best location for the Seattle site. With the support of DF and the Landlord we believe that the antenna is being located in the least intrusive area on the site. It will be in a private parking lot with limited visibility from roads and the surrounding residential areas. This location of the antenna allows us to have a free and clear look angle of 147 degrees and meets the requirements of being within 115 meters of where the indoor equipment will be located. The antenna cannot be placed on the roof of Digital Fortress due to size and the structural weight bearing limitations of the building. The antenna size chosen for this site is larger than that used for Spaceway primarily because the amount of traffic to be provided is more than 20 times higher than that provided by the Spaceway site. The size of an earth station antenna is chosen based on the amount of bandwidth supported by the gateway. The Jupiter-2 antenna has been sized to support the much higher total bandwidth than the existing Spaceway antennas. The dish -type antenna design is the only viable Page 1 of 2 SABEY CONSTRUCTION 112201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor I Seattle, Washington 98168-5121 206.281.8700 main 1206.281.0920 fax I sabeydatacenters.com Prr,PIN/n SABEY Architecture technology to deliver the required performance. The antenna is mounted to a pedestal at a height just sufficient to allow clearance to the ground during its installation. In normal operation, theantenna will be pointing up at an angle of about 30 degrees. The antenna area will be fenced off and only safety or other mandated signs, if any, will be present on the antenna. The antenna will be located adjacent to a parking lot that has over fifty available spaces at any given time for ample parking. Please see the attached site plan. The antenna will be used only for its stated purpose and will carry no advertising. The noise level from the new antenna will be no greater than what is emitted from the (2) existing Spaceway antennas. The antenna reflector, back -structure, and pedestal are painted white with most of the remaining hardware being galvanized steel. Additional lighting at the site will only be used when work personnel are on -site doing maintenance at night, which is typically twice per year. Otherwise, the existing parking lot lighting will not be changed. Sincerely, SABEY ARCHITECTURE Sandra Suskic Project Manager Page 2 of 2 SABEY CONSTRUCTION 112201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor I Seattle, Washington 98168-5121 206.281.8700 main 1206.281.0920 fax I sabeydatacenters.com SPBEY Architecture March 26, 2015 0 �ar�U Site adress: \°f3 Intergate West — Building C Q3 12101 Tukwila International Blvd. Seattle , 98168 Project: Digital Fortress , Proposed Jupiter II Antenna Structure 8.1 meter Zoning: Commercial/ Light Industrial 1. Application Checklist 2. Application Form 3. 4 sets of plans(including Site plan/elevations, Civil plans , Structural plans 4. Completed and Notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless permission to enter property 5. A letter describing the project 6. A narrative responding to criteria at TCM sec. 18.58.060 7. The radio frequency report and radiation hazard information 8. Engineering plans and calculations: • Geotechinal Evaluation • Retaining Wall design calculation • Antenna foundation Calculations • Exterior Site work information/Electrical information 9. Vicinity map showing is proprietary information and not available for general public. "Hughes" and "Digital Fortress" may be able to release this information if Ithe document is protected. 10. Photo simulations (). 11. Evidence of compliance with FAA We submitted the project and registered under FAA : ASN Number is 2015-ASN266-OE. The final determination has not been finalized. 12. Structural design for the Antenna Sincerely, SABEY ARCHITECTURE Sandra Suskic Project Manager Page 1 of 1 SABEY CONSTRUCTION 112201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor I Seattle, Washington 98168-5121 206.281.8700 main 1206.281.0920 fax I sabeydatacenters.com -'CEIVED MAR 272015 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I . I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at kt/p/77J '4,(, ri. f t/.edt/a(, , % ktkik9ieet, / WA for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any Toss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at (city), (,c)f - (state), on Maya k, a 5- , 20 /°5 RECEIVED 27 2S1i GG0(01'1i1(411 Y DEVELOPMENT ?airc t" (Print Name) /22Of iuku rya, �h-/. &E-'vo -J1- (Address)s QQ �, w4 'q la 62o0 aa/- Rio& (Phone Nu (Signature ifida 4 4. On this day personally appeared before me P6dr-t&a, 6p-.4_,IQ„6( to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. frivikeol \\deptstore\City Common\Tell \Revis n Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx BEFORE ME ON THIS a454k DAY OF 1%1'�ct�G�.., ,20/5 NOTARY PUBIC in, and for the State of Washington residing at Q VC/7 / (. )A My Commission expires on COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: Items 1-9 are required for ALL Wireless Telecommunication Facilities. V 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. V 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). V 3. Four sets of plans prepared by a design professional. The plans shall include a vicinity map, site map, architectural elevations, method of attachment, proposed screening, location of proposed antennas, and all other information which accurately depicts the proposed project. Minimum size is 8 1/2" x 11". Plans shall be no greater than 24" x 36". 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. ✓ 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). l`� `� 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist. SEPA is not required when the facility: i) Is a microcell and is to be attached to an existing structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school; ii) Includes personal wireless antennas, other than a microcell, and is to be attached to an existing structure (that may be an existing tower) that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school, and the existing structure to which it is to be attached is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest or agriculture zone; or iii) Involves constructing a personal wireless tower less than sixty feet in height that is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone. ✓ 7. A letter from the applicant describing the proposed project and describing compliance with the City's Code requirements. 1.11k 8. Sensitive Area studies and proposed mitigation (if required). N l ('� 9. If an outdoor generator is proposed, a report prepared by an acoustical engineer demonstrating compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". If the application requires a Type 2 review these additional items are needed: 10. Four sets of photo simulations that depict the existing and proposed view of the proposed facility; 11. Materials board for the screening material; 12. Landscaping plan; 13. Letter from a radio frequency engineer that demonstrates that the facility meets Federal requirements for allowed emissions; 14. If the facility is located within a residential zone, a report from a radio frequency engineer explaining the need for the proposed wireless communication facility at that location. Additionally, the applicant shall provide detailed discussion on why the wireless communication facility cannot be located within a commercial or industrial zone. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wreless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx 0 Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning If the application requires a Type 3 review these additional items are needed: ✓ 15. A narrative responding to the criteria at TMC Section 18.58.060. 16. The radio frequency engineer report shall include a discussion of the information required under TMC Section 18.58.070. The report shall also explain why a tower must be used instead of any of the other location options outlined in Table A. ✓ 17. Engineering Plans for the proposed tower. 18. A vicinity map depicting the proposed extent of the service area. 19. A graphic simulation showing the appearance of the proposed tower and ancillary structures and ancillary facilities from five points within the impacted vicinity. Such points are to be mutually agreed upon by the Director of DCD and applicant. All plans and photo simulations shall include the maximum build -out of the proposed facility. 20. Evidence of compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for height and lighting and certificates of compliance from all affected agencies. \✓ 21. Evidence that the tower has been designed to meet the minimum structural standards for wireless communication facilities for a minimum of three providers of voice, video or data transmission services, including the applicant, and including a description of the number and types of antennas the tower can accommodate. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 22. Payment of notice board fee (see Land Use Fee schedule) to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 23. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. 24. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 WIRELESS TELE- COMMUNICATION FACILITIES FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-WIRE Planner: File Number: /i/ c -- QV l Application Complete Date: Project File Number: i.,G / - 4%1l� Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: ei� / Ce(Q NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Digital Fortress - Satellite Antenna Project BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Land based installation of 8.1 meter satellite antenna CIRCLE TYPE - TYPE 1 TYPE 2 ■ TYPE 3 (PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ROD) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 12101 Tukwila International Blvd - Westerly side of Building C LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 092304-9309 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name:John Ford - Vice President - Sabey Data Center Properties Address: 12201 Tukwila International Blvd. Phone: (206) 281-8700 E-mail: Signature: FAX: (206) 281-0920 RECEIVED I-V,,;( 272L1b Sed,?_t- • CoM/ Date: 1.1 `1t l Of'MEN( \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx SE ■ a division of CALIAN Ltd. Revision 2 August 25, 2014 Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RF Terminal Radiation Hazard Analysis 131999 RECEI\/ED z J J Prepared by System Engineer D. Brownell Approved by Lead Hardware Engineer J. Franz Approved by Lead System Engineer D. Stensrud Approved by Project Manager S. Traill 18 Innovation Blvd., P.O. Box 1464 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan CANADA S7K 3P7 Tel: (306) 931-3425 Fax: (306) 933-1486 www.sedsystems.ca Contents Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Purpose 1-1 1.2 Scope 1-1 1.3 Abbreviations and Acronyms 1-1 1.4 Release History 1-1 2.0 Radiation Hazard Overview 2-1 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Hazard Descriptions and Limits 2-1 2.3 Earth Station Configuration 2-1 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation 3-1 3.1 Radiation Hazard at Antenna Surface 3-1 3.2 On Axis Power Densities 3-1 3.2.1 On -Axis Near Field Region 3-1 3.2.2 On Axis Transition Region 3-2 3.2.3 On Axis Far Field Region 3-2 3.3 Off Axis Power Densities 3-3 3.3.1 Off Axis Far Field Region 3-3 3.3.2 Off Axis Near and Transition Region 3-3 3.4 Safe Operating Distance Calculation 3-3 3.4.1 On Axis Safe Distances 3-3 3.4.1.1 5.6m Antenna 3-4 3.4.1.2 8.1m Antenna 3-4 3.4.2 Safe Occupancy Area 3-4 Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis 131999(2) SED Systems ii Contents Figures Page 3-1 Calculation of Safe Distance from Antenna 3-5 Tables Page 2-1 Site Antenna Parameters 2-1 3-1 Power Densities in the Transition Region 3-2 131999(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis SED Systems 1.0 Introduction 1-1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose This analysis will predict the radiation levels present at the Jupiter-2 sites due to the satellite antenna. 1.2 Scope This document will estimate the radiation hazards at different points at each site. As well, the safe distances and the near and far field will be calculated. 1.3 Abbreviations and Acronyms The following is a list of abbreviations and acronyms used in this document or commonly used on the program. ASC ASC Signal Corporation CFE Customer Furnished Equipment COTS Commercial Off -The -Shelf CW Continuous Wave HPA High Power Amplifier MTBF Mean Time Between Failures NPR Noise Power Ratio RF Radio Frequency RFT RF Terminal SAT Site Acceptance Test SED SED Systems, a division of Calian Ltd. TCP Transmission Control Protocol TWTA Traveling Wave Tube Amplifier 1.4 Release History Revision Date Record of Changes 1 August 13, 2014 Initial version 2 August 25, 2014 Update safe occupancy area calculation to show reduction required for radiation to be reduced to safe levels rather than reduced by 20 dB. Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis SED Systems 131999(2) 1-2 1.0 Introduction This page intentionally left blank. 131999(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis SED Systems 2.0 Radiation Hazard Overview 2-1 2.0 Radiation Hazard Overview 2.1 Introduction This analysis predicts the radiation levels around the Jupiter-2 satellite antennas supplied by ASC. This report is developed in accordance with the prediction methods contained in OED Bulletin NO. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields," Edition 97-01, pp 26-30. 2.2 Hazard Descriptions and Limits The maximum level of radiation exposure is different for employees of the site as opposed to the general public. The maximum level of non -ionizing radiation to which employees may be exposed to is limited to a power density level of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (5 mW/cm2) averaged over any 6 minute period in a controlled environment. The maximum level of non -ionizing radiation to which the general public may be exposed to is limited to a power density of 1 milliwatt per square centimeter (1 mW/cm2) averaged over any 30 minute period in an uncontrolled environment. Note that the worst case radiation hazard exists along the antenna beam axis, which is unlikely to be aligned with any occupied area since that would make the antenna link unusable. 2.3 Earth Station Configuration The earth stations for Jupiter-2 all have the same RF hardware (upconverters, TWTAs etc.) running at the same frequencies, but the radiation hazards will change depending on the antenna size. Table 2-1 Site Antenna Parameters Antenna Parameter 5.6m Antenna 8.1 m Antenna Antenna Diameter 5.6 m 8.1 m Antenna Surface Area 24.63 m2 51.53 m2 Antenna Isotropic Gain 62.6 dBi 65.3 dBi Nominal Efficiency (E) 60% 55% Nominal Frequency 29.15 GHz 29.15 GHz Nominal Wavelength (A) 0.0103 m 0.0103 m Total Transmit Power 500 W 500 W W/G Loss from Transmitter to Feed 0.49 dB 0.49 dB Total Feed Input Power 447 W 447 W Near Field Limit Rnf = D2/4A 762 m 1595 m Far Field Limit Rff = 0.6 * D2/A 1830 m 3828 m Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis 131999(2) SED Systems 2-2 2.0 Radiation Hazard Overview This page intentionally left blank. 131999(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis SED Systems 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation 3-1 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation 3.1 Radiation Hazard at Antenna Surface The power densities at or near the reflector surface is expected to exceed safe levels. This area will not be accessible to the general public. Operators and technicians will receive training identifying the area as a high exposure area, and procedures will be established to ensure that transmit capability is locked out any time service access to this area is required. The power density is calculated with the expression: PDrefl = 4P/A (1) Where: P = total power at the feed in milliwatts A = total area of the reflector in square centimeters This results in a PDrefl = 7.25 mW/cm2 for a 5.6m antenna and a PDrefl = 3.47 mW/cm2 for an 8.1 m antenna. 3.2 On Axis Power Densities The power densities from the antenna will always be strongest on -axis. However, since for performance reasons the antenna will always be pointed to the satellite with at least 10° elevation, the on axis power densities will not be an issue for either the employees of the site or the general public, since the antenna will not be pointing in their direction. However, the power densities for those areas are calculated below for reference. 3.2.1 On -Axis Near Field Region The radiated power in the near field approximates a cylindrical volume with the diameter of the antenna. In the near field, the power density is not uniform nor does it vary uniformly with the distance from the antenna, so for determining a radiation hazard it is assumed that the on axis flux density in the near field is at its maximum for the length of this area. The near field distance, Rnf, is calculated and shown for each antenna in Table 2-1. The maximum power density in the near field is calculated with the expression: PDnf = (16 * s * P)/(x * D2) (2) For a 5.6m antenna, the PDnf is 4.35 mW/cm2 up to 762 m from the antenna, and the PDnf is 1.91 mW/cm2 up to 1595 m from the antenna for the 8.1m antenna. Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis 131999(2) SED Systems 3-2 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation 3.2.2 On Axis Transition Region The transition region refers to the area between the near field and far field. At this point, the power density begins to vary inversely with the distance from the antenna. The maximum power density of the transition region will not exceed the maximum power density in the near field. The power density can be calculated with the expression: PD = PDnf * Rnf / R (3) Where: PDnf= near field power density Rnf = Near field distance R = distance to the point of calculation For the Jupiter-2 analysis, the transition region on axis power densities were calculated for three equally spaced points from the antenna. The calculated values are shown in Table 3-1 below. Table 3-1 Power Densities in the Transition Region Transition 5.6m Antenna 8.1m Antenna Distance (m) Power Density (mW/cm2) Distance (m) Power Density (mW/cm2) Zone 1 1029 3.22 2153 1.41 Zone 2 1296 2.56 2711 1.12 Zone 3 1563 2.12 3270 0.93 3.2.3 On Axis Far Field Region In the far field, the on axis power density varies inversely with the square of the distance from the antenna. The power density is calculated with the expression: PDff = PG/(4itR2) (4) Where: P = Total Power at the Feed G = Numeric antenna gain relative to isotropic radiator R = Distance to the point of interest At the start of the far field (distance R = Rff), the power density is 1.93 mW/cm2 for a 5.6m antenna and 0.82 mW/cm2 for an 8.1m antenna. 131999(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis SED Systems 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation 3-3 3.3 Off Axis Power Densities 3.3.1 Off Axis Far Field Region In the far field, the power is distributed in a pattern of maxima and minima (sidelobes) as a function of the off axis angle between the antenna center line and the point of interest. Off axis power density in the far field can be estimated using the antenna radiation patterns prescribed for the antenna in use, which usually corresponds to the antenna gain pattern developed by the FCC which takes the form of: Goff = 32 — 251og(0) (5) This equation holds true for 0 of 1 to 48 degrees. For values of 0 from 48 to 180 degrees, use -10 dBi. The power levels off axis will be quite low in the far field, since the antenna is typically pointed at the sky. For instance, the power level at a 1 ° offset at the far field limit (1830 m for a 5.6m antenna and 3828 m for an 8.1m antenna) would be 5.3 nW/cm2 for a 5.6m antenna and 1.2 nW/cm2 for an 8.1m antenna. 3.3.2 Off Axis Near and Transition Region From the FCC bulletin, if you can assume that the point of interest is at least one antenna diameter removed from the center of the main beam, then the power density at that point will be at least a factor of 100 (20 dB) less than the value calculated for the equivalent on axis power density in the main beam. So for any region at least D meters from the center line of the dish, the power density can be calculated as: PDoff-axis = PDon-axis/1.00 (6) Therefore, the off axis near field power levels can be calculated as 0.043 mW/cm2 for a 5.6m antenna and 0.019 mW/cm2 for an 8.1m antenna. However, both of these values are well below the minimum safe operating levels of 1 mW/cm2. The 20 dB reduction due to one antenna diameter off the antenna axis comes from Figure 14 in an EPA report The Radiofrequency Radiation Environment: Environmental Exposure Levels and RF Radiation Emitting Sources, EPA 520/1-84- 014. From 3.2.3, we know that in the near field (for which Figure 14 is valid) the radiation levels are 4.35 mW/cm2 for a 5.6m antenna and 1.91 mW/cm2 for an 8.1m antenna. With that in mind, a point of interest that is 2.5m from the centre of the beam of the 5.6m antenna will reduce the power density by 7.5dB to 0.77 mW/cm2. A point of interest that is 2.95m from the centre of the beam of the 8.1m antenna will reduce the power density by 5dB to 0.604 mW/cm2. 3.4 Safe Operating Distance Calculation 3.4.1 On Axis Safe Distances In order to determine the safe operating distances, we use the on axis power density results from sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 to determine which region the power density is 5 mW/cm2 (for employees, in a controlled environment) and 1 mW/cm2 (for the general public, in an uncontrolled environment). Then the power density formula for that region can be rearranged so that the distance can be solved for with the desired power level used as an input. Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis 131999(2) SED Systems 3-4 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation 3.4.1.1 5.6m Antenna The only location that has a power density outside of the limits for employees is at the actual surface of the antenna. Any location on the ground will have less than 5 mW/cm2 of power density, and is therefore considered safe. The general public safety level of 1 mW/cm2 is in the far field, and solving equation 4 for R gives us a safe operating distance of 2543 m. 3.4.1.2 C 8.1m Antenna For an 8.1 m antenna, not even the antenna reflector surface exceeds the safe power density level. Any location will have less than 5 mW/cm2 of power density, and is therefore considered safe. The general public safety level of 1 mW/cm2 is in the transition zone, and solving equation 4 for R gives us a safe operating distance of 3041 m. 3.4.2 Safe Occupancy Area The distance (S) from a vertical axis passing through the center of the antenna to a safe location in front of the antenna as shown in Figure 3-1 below can be determined using the dish diameter calculation as follows: S = (d/sin a) + (h — (D/2 + o))/(tan a) (7) Where: a = the minimum elevation angle of the antenna D = diameter of the dish in meters o = distance from dish edge at 0° elevation to ground d = offset distance from centerline of antenna h = maximum height of the object to be cleared in meters 131999(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis SED Systems 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation 3-5 Figure 3-1 Calculation of Safe Distance from Antenna From 3.3.2, we see that the safe offset distance d is 2.5 m for the 5.6m antenna and 2.95 m for the 8.1m antenna. For the Jupiter-2 sites, the worst case minimum elevation angle is 27° (for the Edmonton, Canada site) and the maximum height is assumed to be 2 m (maximum possible height of a person). The offset distance o from the edge of the dish to the ground at 0° elevation is 0.74m for the 5.6m dish and 0.25m for the 8.1m dish. This results in a safe distance of 2.6 m for a 5.6m antenna and 2.0 m for an 8.1m antenna. A fence or other barrier should be provided in front of the antenna to prevent casual occupancy of the area in front of the antenna to that distance. Safe distances for additional elevation angles are provided below: Elevation Angle (°) Safe Distance (m) 5.6m 8.1m 30 2.4 1.9 40 2.1 1.8 50 2.0 1.9 60 2.0 2.1 Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis 131999(2) SED Systems 3-6 3.0 Radiation Hazard Calculation This page intentionally left blank. 131999(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Radiation Hazard Analysis SED Systems IN ■411=■ ■__ uuncim RECEIVED EXTERIOR SITEWORK INSTALLATION INFORMATION FOR THE Jupiter 2 Gateway September 12, 2014 PREPARED BY — Hughes Network Systems, LLC, Archcentric P.C., Fazio Engineering Page 1 of 22 REVISION HISTORY Revision Date of Issue Scope one August 28, 2014 6/A/1 — Added submittal requirement two September 12, 2014 9/D — Updated Utility Power Panel Schedule for 5.6 Meter and 8.1 Meter Antennas Attachment A — 5.6 Meter Conduit Placement Attachment B — 8.1 Meter Conduit Placement Attachment C — 5.6 Meter Generic Plan, 8.1 Meter Generic Plan Page 2 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 1. SCOPE OF WORK — Site Owner will be required to accomplish the following scope of work in preparation of their site for the installation of either a 5.6M or 8.1M satellite antenna and associated electronic equipment racks. Hughes Network Systems, LLC (HUGHES) will negotiate with the site owner for the costs & schedule associated with this work. Actual installation of the antennas will be done by Hughes Contractors at the completion of all civil works infrastructure improvements by the site Owner. A. Review of site and existing facility with Hughes personnel. If not an existing gateway site, Hughes will visit your site and will reach a tentative agreement with the site operator as to potential locations for the antennas and electronic equipment racks. B. Site Owner will provide a site survey of the proposed antenna locations. Survey shall be provided in AutoCAD 2012 format for use by Hughes consultant in determining exact antenna placement. Survey shall be done by a licensed professional surveyor. See section 5A of this document for additional survey requirements. C. Hughes shall provide to the site owner the proposed layout of the antennas. Layout will include antenna placement, fencing placement, Tight and camera placement. Generic layouts provided in attachments section F for preliminary information only. Site Owner shall review proposed layout and, if acceptable, shall proceed. Site Owner shall secure the services of local design professionals (civil engineering, electrical engineering, etc.) as needed to prepare permit ready, stamped and signed construction documents for the improvements needed for the exterior antenna yard. If required by local codes and authorities, the Site Owner along with Hughes shall secure zoning approval for the proposed antenna installation. Local design professionals shall be responsible for meeting all local codes as are applicable for this work. For project reference and design purposes see antenna one -line diagram, load center power distribution chart and requirements for the 5.6 or 8.1 M antenna, anticipated measured loads chart for Hughes outdoor equipment for the antenna installation, diagram of typical antenna foundation with conduit and panel -board locations, and a prototypical antenna foundation design (for informational purposes only — final foundation design of the antenna pad will be provided by Hughes structural engineer). D. Site Owner shall secure the services of a local geotechnical engineering firm to provide a soils/geotechnical investigation report for the installation of the antenna foundations if one is not available. The report shall be stamped and signed by a qualified, licensed engineer. The report will be used as the basis of design for the antenna foundations. The antenna foundation design will be done by a structural engineer employed by Hughes with final stamped and signed foundation construction documents to be supplied to the Site Owner by Hughes for their use in permitting and construction of the antenna foundations. E. The Site Owner shall secure the services of local construction contractors as they deem needed for the completion of the infrastructure improvements needed for the installation of the Hughes antenna yard. Local contractors shall be licensed and experienced with this type of work and shall meet all of the Page 3 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites requirements imposed by local authorities for permitting and construction of the required improvements including inspections and materials testing requirements. The site owner shall be responsible for all contracting and coordination of the construction contractor for this work. Hughes shall supply to the Site Owner the templates and embed bolts to be placed in the concrete antenna foundations prior to pouring of concrete in the foundation forms. Hughes can supply the name(s) of contractors who have completed previous projects satisfactory to Hughes if needed. F. Site Owner shall complete the installation of infrastructure improvements needed for the installation of all Hughes antenna equipment, improvements to include but not limited to antenna foundations, fencing, electrical work, etc. Site Owner shall coordinate required schedule with Hughes and the Site Owner contractors. The Site Owner shall arrange for secure staging area of the Hughes equipment as it arrives at site. G. Facility Electronic Systems Integration Hughes will provide complete system information and installation of the Hughes satellite antenna equipment along with the Hughes communications systems electronics equipment to be placed in the facility. The Site Owner design team will be provided documentation as needed for them to design the facility interface infrastructure for the final installation (by others) of the satellite antennas including the IFL interface for connection of the antenna to the interior equipment racks. The Site Owner design team shall provide to Hughes (for Hughes review and approval) the proposed infrastructure improvements to support the installation and operation of the Hughes equipment. See attached information on antennas & foundations. H. The HNS antenna contractor (SED) will contract with the Site Owner's electrical contractor to make final connections to Hughes antennas from the antenna systems power panels The Site Owner shall have his electrical contractor make the final grounding connections to the Hughes antennas. Site Owner shall commission and verify operation of all systems (electrical power, lighting & grounding, security access/control, security cameras) prior to final operational status of the Hughes equipment. Site Owner and their contractor shall cooperate in alll aspects of the facility infrastructure improvements as requested by Hughes. Any enclosure for cableways, etc. at the building penetration will be the responsibility of the Site Owner and their electrical contractor. A grounding plate will be required at the building penetration point and shall be furnished/installed by the Site Owner and their electrical contractor. The HNS antenna contractor (SED) will provide grounding cables to ground the IFL cables to this grounding plate. 2. SITE FUNCTIONS & VERIFICATION A. Utilities 1. Hughes is currently in the process of evaluating sites. Electncal service to the selected site shall be of high importance. Not only shall the available Page 4 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites service have the capacity to serve this new project, it shall be a reliable source of power and also a quality power system. 2. This project will have technical power requirements (i.e., uninterruptible, clean power for electronic hardware and systems, supported by appropriately sized redundant UPS' and generator system). Please refer to the electrical systems section of this program. 3. It is assumed that the selected site will have land based communications systems available of the type and capacity as required for the project and as desired by Hughes. Verify pricing and availability with Hughes. 4. It is assumed that the site is not within an established 100 year FEMA flood plain. Provide verification to Hughes. B. Antennas 1. It is currently anticipated that this project will include the installation of one 5.6M antenna or one 8.1 M antenna. Hughes will provide to each site operator the anticipated antenna plan based upon Site Owner provided survey information. 2. Antennas will be located in a fenced or secure antenna yard that will be monitored and shall be accessible to Hughes or Hughes Contractor personnel. Space shall be allowed for antenna delivery, assembly, erection & maintenance, not only initially but also for future installations. Antennas will need to be located within 115 meters (377 linear feet) of the Hughes RF equipment to be located in the building. In order to minimize the cabling that is shipped to the site for installation — Hughes will need the site operator to undertake a measurement once the antennas are located on the site from the antenna to the indoor equipment area and provide that measurement to Hughes and the Antenna vendor KNZ 1 z b GATEWAY BUILDING Page 5 of 22 ti 115 METERS MAXIMUM (IFL LENGTH) Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 3. Hughes desires that all antennas have full view of geosynchronous dorflestic satellite arc, 84w to 121w. The orbital slot for the J2 satellite is 97.1 w. 4. It is assumed that all antennas will be ground mounted on cast -in -place reinforced concrete foundations. See attached prototype foundation design drawings for initial pricing purposes. The Hughes structural engineer will verify this foundation design based upon geotechnical investigation provided by the Site Owner. 5. The enclosed, fenced antenna yard shall have a minimum of 3" depth of 3/4" gravel over weed barrier material throughout the antenna yard. 6. Attention to detail of antenna cable management and building entry shall be considered in design and approved by Hughes. 7. The antenna yard shall be designed to securely enclose the Hughes antenna. Hughes shall supply the Site Owner with a suggested antenna yard layout concept. Adjacent to the antenna yard should be clear space available for the antenna assembly along with space for lift equipment to lift and place the antenna assembly in final position on the antenna foundation. Clear space shall also be available outside the antenna yard for antenna maintenance lift truck access for antenna maintenance as needed. Site Owner shall cooperate with Hughes for all initial installation and any ongoing antenna maintenance operations as required. C. Site Maintenance — (Antenna Yard Area) 1. Minimal landscaping is desired. No landscaping initially or in the future shall be maintained or placed that would jeopardize the clear look angle from the Hughes antennas. Hughes prefers 3" deep minimum, 3/4" diameter gravel over weed barrier for ground cover and minimal maintenance in the antenna yard if approved by local authorities. 2. Cabling vaults/trenches will be provided as required. The purpose is to organize utilities/services for ease of maintenance/installation and also prevention of ground water from entering the building through numerous utility penetrations. Trenches/vaults shall allow for growth and not obstruct potential building expansion. 3. Site lighting shall be designed with safety, security, aesthetics and maintenance in mind in addition to compliance with local codes. 4. Site Owner will determine if the proposed development of the site needs to be reviewed and approved by local authorities having jurisdiction. Time is of the essence in having the Site Owner determine the development requirements of their local authorities having jurisdiction for approval of this project including anticipated schedule of approvals and associated costs/fees. 3. EXISTING FACILITY MECHANICAL SYSTEMS VERIFICATION A. Backup Generator Fuel System 1. Hughes prefers that the existing backup generator system have on -site availability to a minimum of 3-5 days fuel capacity. Site Owner shall provide documentation as to the design and operational characteristics of the current backup generator fuel system including current contracts for availability of refueling services. Page 6 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 4. EXISTING FACILITY ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS VERIFICATION A. Component Verification — refer to interior equipment installation document, section 4.A for component verification requirements. B. New Antenna Electrical Requirements. 1. Each antenna will require two (2) 120/208 volt, single phase feeds from an UPS system, one feed being from a UPS "A" system and second feed being from a UPS "B" system. Each feed will terminate at a panelboard. 2. Each antenna will require one (1) 120/208 volt, three phase feed from an engine generator back up system. The feed will terminate at a panelboard. 3. Refer to the panelboard schedules for the size of the feeds.. 4. GENERAL ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS a. All conductors shall be copper. No aluminum conductors will be allowed. Sized per National Electric Code (NEC) guidelines. b. No AC or MC conductors are allowed. c. Conduits for branch circuits and feeders to be per NEC guidelines. d. Four (4) sets of complete submittals will be required for all electrical equipment. e. Electrical contractor shall have demonstrated experience constructing similar facilities. f. Electrical engineer shall have demonstrated experience designing similar facilities and shall be licensed in the state where the infrastructure is constructed. g. Warranty = One (1) year, material and labor, after acceptance by Hughes. 5. DEFINITIONS — refer to interior equipment installation document, section 4.B.2 for electrical system definitions. (THIS SPACE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) Page 7 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 6. PANELBOARDS (at antenna) a. Use Square D NQ (circuit breaker type) panelboards with QOB circuit breakers. b. Load Centers are not appropriate for this application. c. Ampere rating as required. d. Copper bussing. e. NEMA 4 enclosure. f. AIC rating — as required. g. Branch circuit breakers spaces as required. h. Branch circuit breakers — bolt -on and as required. i. Feed-thru lugs as required. j. Mount panelboard on uni-strut or antenna tower as directed by SED. k. Install and provide branch circuiting, device, backbox and cover for antenna mounted receptacle. I. Install and provide branch circuiting fittings; antenna installers will install and provide branch circuiting. m. Unless otherwise noted, provide and install all branch circuit fittings (i.e., grommets). Antenna installers (SED) will contract with the Site Owner's electrical contractor to install and provide all branch circuiting and will make final connections to antenna panelboards. 7. LIGHTING SYSTEMS a. Provide exterior pole mounted lighting to illuminate the front & back of each antenna. 8. GROUNDING a. Ground ring required at each antenna pad. b. Use #2 bare copper conductor, located 24" off of the pad and 30" deep (below finished grade). c. Interconnect ground rings with bidirectional connections. d. Ground rods at the four corners and at the midpoints of the north/south and east/west sections of the ground rings, minimum. Minimum of eight (8) ground rods per antenna pad. Ground rods — 3/A" x 8', copper. e. Exothermic connections. f. Ground bars at all antennas with connection to ground ring. g. Maximum resistance shall be one (1.0) ohm or less. Measure using the three point method and prior to any connection to existing ground systems. h. Connect to antenna tower as shown on SED drawings. i. Recommend making a connection between main electric service electrode grounding system (i.e. master ground bar in the main electrical room). Page 8 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 9. ANTENNA LOW VOLTAGE RACEWAY a. Install multiple conduits (PVC, Schedule 40) between each antenna and an exterior mounted surge arrester cabinet. Surge arrester cabinet shall be a NEMA 3R, lockable, 60" high x 48" wide x 18" deep cabinet, equal to or exceed Saginaw Control & Engineering Model #SCE-604818FSD (see product information attachment). Exterior mounted surge arrester cabinet will interface underground conduits to an interior ceiling height, wave guide port mounted in the building wall. Install a ground bar in the surge arrester cabinet. See Antenna conduit plans in attachments sections. b. Pullboxes, as required, every 25 meters (82 feet). To size the pullbox, refer to SED documents for minimum radius of the cables. c. All conduit elbows are to be factory wide sweep elbows. d. Install pullstrings. 10. SECURITY SYSTEM/CCTV PROVISIONS — (Hughes to provide and coordinate installation with their Security Vendor and Site Owner) a. Provide facility standard CCTV in antenna yard (2 cameras minimum) Antenna yard cameras shall be operational in inclement weather conditions and low light conditions. Hughes personnel shall be capable of remote monitoring of these CCTV images. Provide DVR recording of images and store for a minimum seven day period. Hughes will coordinate with their preferred Security Vendor for equipment and Installation. Site Operator will be responsible for the installation of conduits for cabling. See section 7. Camera low voltage conduit should terminate within the exterior surge arrestor cabinet . b. Provide facility standard access control or locking device to the antenna yard — see Section 7 (Physical Security Requirement). c. Site Operator will be responsible for the installation of conduits for security system devices. 11. LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM a. Verify if existing facility has an operational lightning protection system. 5. CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING A. Site Survey 1. Site Owner will engage the services of a licensed surveyor to provide a current site survey to be used as the basis of design for all site related work unless Site Owner has one on file. Site survey must be acceptable to local authorities having jurisdiction for planning and permitting procedures. Provide survey in AutoCAD 2012 format. This work is typically performed by an independent surveying company or by the design team civil engineer. Survey will generally include but is not limited to: a. Property legal description b. Metes & bounds survey information Page 9 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites c. Topological information, contours at 1' intervals maximum & spot elevations d. Property easement information e. Location of existing utility lines including invert elevations. f. Location of future planned utility lines g. Location of significant vegetation including size and species of trees over 4" caliper. h. Direction of "true north" for use in planning satellite antenna positioning. (Direction to North Star)(Geodetic North is acceptable) i. Location of any visible rock outcroppings. j. Location & description of any improvements on or adjacent to the site. k. Description of any site encumbrances including building setback lines, easements, etc. I. Current land uses or proposed land uses on adjacent properties. m. Current zoning including maximum allowed building heights on adjacent properties. n. Latitude and longitude of the proposed antenna yard. B. Geotechnical Report 1. Site Owner will engage the services of a licensed geotechnical engineering firm to do a full soils testing program and to develop recommendations/ criteria for the design of equipment support foundations, antenna foundations, pavement sections, etc., if ones does not exist. 2. Geotechnical investigation will also determine level of ground water on the proposed site with recommendations for any required mitigation. C. Storm Drainage System 1. If required, the Site Owner hired Civil Engineer of Record will design site storm drainage system to coordinate and connect to public storm drainage system or as otherwise required by local authorities. This includes the final grading design which must also meet ADA site design requirements. 2. Civil Engineer will review final design requirements with Hughes & Site Owner to insure long term facility objectives are met. D. Environmental Survey 1. Site Owner assumes all responsibility for requirements of any Environmental Survey as needed. Site Owner shall warranty to Hughes that there are no conditions that could pose a detriment to the construction or operation of this proposed facility. 2. Potential hazards to review for are contaminated ground water, hazardous materials leakage onto the property, previous dumping of materials on the property, historic artifacts, endangered species, etc. 3. See attached documentation from Hughes regarding the radiation hazard analysis of their 5.6 and 8.1 meter antennas. 6. STRUCTURAL A. Special Structural Requirements 1. Hughes will furnish to Site Owner final design of cast -in -place reinforced concrete foundations for antennas. Site Owner and General Construction Contractor shall submit to Hughes the concrete mix Page 10 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites designs and reinforcing steel shop drawings for Hughes/Structural Engineer review and approval. 2. Hughes will furnish to Site Owner antenna embed bolt assemblies to be set by general contractor and cast into the antenna foundations. 3. See attached prototype drawing for the 5.6/8.1 meter antenna foundations. This is not the final design but shall be used for proposal estimating purposes only. 4. Material testing and inspections as required by local authorities shall be accomplished by the Site Owner and his consultants. 5. Hughes may have their personnel on -site at various times to review the construction. 7. PHYSICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENT (Antenna Area) - Hughes Security Integrator to provide A. Entrances to the antenna yard shall be locked and have an alarm monitoring — Contacts on gates can run thru cameras to send email alerts. B. The Antenna area will have 2-3 cameras that provide coverage to the entry gate, one that looks at the front of the antennas and the other that covers the backside of the antennas. C. There should be enough lighting for the cameras to operate properly. 8. SITE READINESS Site Ready Date: HNS: HNS will coordinate for Antennas and Indoor equipment to arrive at the site on or about the site ready date that is agreed to. HNS personnel will be on - site for the delivery of both and will be on -site periodically as needed until all installation activities are complete. Expectations: Outdoor at Antenna Pads: Pads poured Electrical Panels installed and energized both Technical and Non -Technical Non -Technical power is available Electricians will need to terminate all antenna whips into power panels Fence — would prefer fence be installed after antenna installation occurs Fence can be installed within three days after the Antennas are lifted onto the pads Security System — HNS Contractor will begin installation once fencing is up while HNS personnel are on site Construction Dumpster on site for debris Dumpster should be a 40 yard size and will need to be dumped at least once possibly twice with debris Forklift/Operator on site with extended forks on site for off-loading antennas - This may require two days onsite Page 11 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites All reports will need to be completed and copies to Hughes Network Systems. (Grounding 1.0 ohm or less. Concrete reports etc.) Mission Critical Systems (Electrical & Mechanical) All Systems have gone through manufacture start up All Systems commissioned by outside third party with no issues — Power is Stable — all testing is complete 9. ATTACHMENTS A. 5.6 Meter Antenna 1. Prototypical Foundation Design 2. Prototypical Foundation Conduit Schedule 3. Prototypical Foundation Conduit Design B. 8.1 Meter Antenna 1. Prototypical Foundation Design 2. Prototypical Foundation Conduit Schedule 3. Prototypical Foundation Conduit Design C. Generic Antenna Layouts 1. Typical 5.6 Meter Antenna Pad Layout 2. Typical 8.1 Meter Antenna Pad Layout D. Power 1. 5.6 Meter with Electric De -Ice / Antenna Power Distribution 2. 5.6 Meter (no De -Icing) / Antenna Power Distribution 3. 8.1 Meter with Electric De -Ice/ Antenna Power Distribution 4. Antenna Power — Tech A 5. Antenna Power — Tech B E. Surge Arrestor Cabinet 1. Saginaw Enclosure 2. Signal Conduit Enclosure for Surge Arrestors 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT ATTACHED BUT WILL BE SUPPLIED FOR REFERENCE ONLY UPON PROCEEDING WITH PROJECT. A. Final conduit installation design at antenna foundation by SED. Page 12 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 11. DURATION OF EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES A. Access to the site facilities by installation and test personnel is required with durations as anticipated in the table below. Actual dates of these activities are subject to change. Please verify schedule with Hughes. Additional details will also be included in the Installation and Deployment Plan. Activity Approximate Duration Site Facilities Required Equipment deliveries to site: Antenna Subsystem RFT Equipment 1 day 1 clay Access to offloading and indoor storage facilities. Short term storage for TBD shipping containers near the antenna pad location. One container may remain for duration of antenna installation. Antenna Installation 2-3 weeks Completed antenna foundation, concrete pad (including 28 day curing time) and conduit runs complete. Equipment shelter completion_ Access to AC power for power tools RF equipment installation 2-3 weeks Access to Equipment rooms. Access to AC power for power tools. AC power feeds completed. Building penetrations for Cable entry. FacHity HVAC and UPS facilities complete. All cableways completed_ RF and antenna testing 3-5 days Satellite access and cooperating earth station support for approximately 3 -5 days per site END OF EXTERIOR SITEWORK SYSTEMS INSTALLATION DOCUMENT Page 13 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites Attachment A — 5.6 Meter Antenna Page 14 of 22 DESIGN CRITERIA K '. ona,»a.Ano�wrom..ro0.mwo,.nwrrrmwwo, ANTENNA NOTES, { ..a.Momr�..a,Kwoa.a.,.m..omruR.m,.nam� GENERAL NOTES .mar ,w`w"� stun=s�rrnm.som 70.001/110 r..o:ma,m1.CC w.on..,r,.,a ro.mu«,,.KM/•01m.o..ma CD e e «m2ca 2an.mo. oa am. mnean¢ vcanm nnac m arm..rmmnw..miwm.mnwm rem 'm" I rma uz+,.u,rcmwmm,xonnaw.mnw,o anc 1 : �. 'rt.'. 7.3 ernw.00w+mm �"c,.,oan T. ` .awnooa. .„,„y,,,,,,nnwramo..om..,r.>vmroonMA..arm.crr.cuvmw i aavo,r,,,.m.or.�m I ..vMmorrocmw.a.ocown....ouswv,., 1[10 4:14 y �`E N Ej r.,.wwanrw.,a co,amm.,..."'"7'm wmnw,...rm m.,�wna jigY NOTES I�f < M w�„mnosn. oo.,r«rnon..11.0wa.m,w,.. ,,,,,,,non.,.m o. o _ Nocon main Burnt... Qmnm'Sou .,o+vmx. wnia,rrra.a m,c..,ra.annm 4.11 O m o o owe <,o.� mm «n„«n ,.amr mw� I rAra �\ CED C'mauc m,.2a. �, N414414 1.1•••0091,041V al w°n`.,w oM1, oo.[ JUPITER • M ANTENI PROTOTYPE DE: mLi,.mi[,.w..nuar �n.Y�mEl'�..��..noa�ii j.r.w.-romuno, i.mmm�J..vn.n. or.uav .w.o..,n.I.mm,.om,..o., ,.np I . ., �wa.,w, 0°07 O^°••< _ - rnov,ao.wrcowuu.,r ammo n.en wnn,rm .swu1m. i' ml I i aAmonEmrc.ucrmn`ro..w..wmwcommrc w., bar nmr,,..n,an1. CD'I■A mr..sxwvw.rmrv.c.vr..c.ac.mA,..rOW... mcwmMonavamc,w uroiomoµm,µ...nnrzrc nx.ncor No 'd ,.uwa.nwcor.cr.wnnb,n .m.uwaamwr,r.m�,M.n.mmaw..m rn.a„n,ow.,e gym, ~ww,..w . �� x RI� a v.�wmin+ .wxeu COWIN w:.s.«<awc,Ww;Fe.i>o,:a.mw.c7y 8 .-,.v 5.6m FOUNDATION PUN III w r+.rc,wvnc w na•o•vw yjl,6A AE—(y w nvoncnON ,...of. on. mrrccaxcm[ un.w. motmv 1.1 rL• rm w� 0............... :.�., ., wouwm . 11 �ac.rwra.av FOUNDATION b olorvma <e,ancw.or mrnw . I o �E3` �� � 0I:aux:mm.4, _,o wnm aniw�O me .r3mcr�a ex rtwi�onwm ••n.w. m � j mama w v . vr... • A . wn.w 77,,,,,,,,s'�.mmmgc..unsorvcro a.uvw ro B6§a 12 wL'x6 TYP 5.6m ANTENNA FOUNDATION PAD SECTION 6 Nos.ir TVP 5.6m ANTENNAANOIOR BOLTS 3 .a _,yyE 5.6m ANTENNAFOUNDATION DESIGN S1 OggLOADS Conduit Schedule D Size Description Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites Origination Point C1 ' 4" PVC Signal and M&C C2 4" PVC Signal and M&C C3 4" PVC Signal and M&C C4 4" PVC Signal and M&C C5 1 'fi PVC Antenna Cabling — Fiber Optic C6 As Required AC Utility Power C7 As Required AC Tech Power G8 As Required AC Utility Power C9 As Required AC Tech PowerA G10 As Required AC Tech Power B Gf 1 As Required AC Utility Power C12 As Required AC Tech PowerA C13 As Required AC Tech Power B CG1 1" PVC Grounding Cable GG2 1" PVC Grounding Cable CG3 1" PVC Grounding Cable GG4 1" PVC Grounding Cable CG5 1" PVC Grounding Cable Page 15 of 22 Building Signal Cable Entry Box Building Signal Cable Entry Box Building Signal Cable Entry Box Building Signal Cable Entry Box Building Signal Cable Entry Box Utility AC Power Panel Technical AC Power Panel UtilityAC Power Panel Technical AC Power PanetA Technical AC Power Panel B Utility AC Power Technical AC PowerA Technical AG Power B Grounding System Grounding System Grounding System Grounding System Grounding System Termination Point Ante'Ina Access Stub -up Antenna Access Stub -up AnteanaAccess Stub -up Antenna Access Stub -up Antenna ODU Stub -up Antenna ODU Stub -up Antenna ODU Stub -up Antenna Stub -up Antenna Stub -up Antenna Stub -up Util+AC Power Panel Technical AC Power Panel A Technic: WAG Power Panel B Antenna Mechanical Interface Antenna Mechanical interface Antenna Mechanical Interface Antenna Mechanical Interface' Antenna Mechanical Interface Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 5.6 Meter Conduit Placement 5.6m 14'-0" —Pointing Direction 14 -0" MIR 7" 10 9 C 0 E� ►14 s� 2 0' 2.0' C8 C7C 9 C10 C6 Utility/Gen Panel Page 16 of 22 Tech. Panel A Tech Panel B t 42.© Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites Attachment B — 8.1 Meter Antenna Page 17 of 22 DESIGN CRITERIA u -, ,.„,,„„...,,,,o,,,,,.no.,o,,...........a ANTENNA NOTES ,mo„wo=m,manmmw,..,.=ra.,.,oa, a. :�o� aoec,..aeaa.c,.,,cv,aun...mra„ „l.Z3 o,',..'',1 w fr"',3,;=: :. . ..,aw..aao0.. .., 71. ..,,1T.,:..00.:„m,.,,,.,,a.ri.. TES aan .w...m 1 „no m.mMKn<m�°'�wR°`ao wn.n.a¢na.smn,nurc, ���, m,a.u�,.aK . ox owmmm.on, .,wnrt.mv,.21....av,....xo,w..mmeduwuxrawIALLIM,.ma £t . .P / r4 1: ; rrm.n„,,.. V ,.00aicno. ••",'--w ,.,.,.,,..o,,,,.,,,r«„oo.e,,.moao,.www.a ,, am.„,,.aw.,,,..,w.. II ACC60.4.1.1 Wall Yanial001.1..1.0tta.LLICLOYAPCP.12.01.V1.CI)'a,.u. you.,..,,e,... „w- atr�...,.:,....rtoo.,.w.. p, ,,,.,Ko<.,a<.,... .,, NOT,«,.,«,ra..,,.,. p»a.na.,,.«,o.,,ocK,,.... Cr--'.. wMp ..K a,M„„w,Mm,.,.,,.,... m..,,6.M.N, 17. O a,a.,.w,.R.. .,ma,.,o,ro,ww,,,,.u„ar tl..o,.,,.r.ma,a,.0�,M„r OVA, MaNnatal o //j ..,:M. dd../ s.ti.. �' - - +� `F �a 2 }s� �°' Ce a ,maw ann. �.a.W.�ra,.ao TOW. K. . ,,. ,.,.a. o ,oma.,,„K .,R.� p ....,o„a.u„o.,..-Uroma e,«.w,..,,oa�.,.w.....nanl,,N aF a..,...a� an„..r o. ,K.o aa. ate, as .aK w� In Of m�..,.o.,mK..o.m,.K 1..aMOWrt. Ria. . ,.,, a, .M..,m�./E ,a,n..a 19 s urn �.uart, ea, wn,%.x.w vnra,ocar.ro,v..m.a, AT u« ,wr ;se P.M nmcero-u r • ,a 8. 1m FOUNDATION FLAN �' �• w v.Y 51 vswro . w , • _ eft ✓s r,r7 ovv.rz Imam ram owa � f ,uc,on /g11 nn„artwo.r. Bnwana.r: .,, p erteenx. �...um,amwvs ,-/ e,Q.eu.ar c 8.1m ANTENNA FIXRDATWN map . �aK�.aaa ,Qa a g II10 K ...para.... °"po --/ re an. no...� . a,..n, w 4. �.� 9v$ roan .MP/,.wv .a.,.0,`1mz„o. m a 3; 12 .,..ALE TYPB.1m ANTENNA FOUNDATION PAD SECTON a..11,4111. . 6 ups.. TYF B.im ANTENNA ANCHOR BOLTS 81m ANTENNA FOUNDATION DESIGN 3 ,+',5'''" LDS S2 Conduit Schedule 1.1 Cl C2 C3 C4 Size 4" PVC 4" PVC 4' PVC 4" PVC PVC' Description Signal and Signal and M&C Signal and M&C Signal and M&C Antenna Cabling — Fiber Optic C6 As Required AC Utility Power C7 '. As Required AC Tech Power C8 As Required AC Utility Power C9 : As Required ACTech PowerA C10 As Required AC Tech PowerB C1 i As Required ' AC Utility Power C12 As Required AC Tech PowerA C13 As Required , ACTech Power B CG1 CG2 t" PVC Grounding Cable CG3 CG4 1" PVC CG5 1" PVC 1" PVC Grounding Cable Page 18 of 22 1" PVC Grounding Cable Grounding Cable Grounding Cable Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites Origination Point BuiidingSignal Cable Entry Box Building Signal Cable Entry Box Building Signal Cable Entry Box Building Signal Cable Entry Box uilding Signal Cable Entry Box Utility AC Power Panel Technical AC Power Panel Utility AC Power Panel Technical AC Power Panel A Technical AC Power Panel B UtilityAC Power Technical AC PowerA TechnicalAC Power B Grounding System Grounding System Grounding System Grounding System Grounding System Termination Point Antenna Access Stub -up Antenna Access Stub -up Antenna Access Stub -up Antenna Access Stub -up nna ODU Stub -up Antenna ODU Stub -up Antenna ODU Stub -up Antenna Stub -up Antenna Stub -up Antenna Stub -up UtitityAC Power Panel Technical AC Power Panel A Technical AC Power Panel B Antenna Mechanical Interface Antenna Mechanical Interface Antenna Mechanical Interface Antenna Mechanical Interface Antenna Mechanical Interface 0 M&e Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites 8.1 Meter Conduit Placement &.1rn Page 19 of 22 Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites Attachment C — Generic Antenna Layouts Page 20 of 22 SECURITY CAMERA MOUNTED BELOW LIGHT ON TOP OF 12 FOOT HIGH POST 34'-0' ANTENNA DISH OBSTRUCTION CLEARANCE 14'-0� / ANTENNA FOUNDATION UPS Tech Tech W TPs piter 2 - 5.6 meter antenna layo eneric Layout 1' GRAVEL, 3' DEEP OVER WEED BARRIER, TYPICAL — GENERIC PLAN 4 FOOT WIDE BY 8 FOOT HIGH LOCKING HORIZONTAL SLIDING GATE WITH ALARM CONTACT TO SECURITY SYSTEM 1MLETERSTM 8� ET ■ •µ■ • _/ _ _ SYSTEMpUO1TS FOLLOW FLPRACKS K EQUIPME� 8 FOOT HIGH FENCING TRUE NORTH SECURITY CAMERA MOUNTED BELOW LIGHT ON TOP OF 12 FOOT HIGH POST NOTE: SECURITY CAMERAS REQUIRES A 1• CONDUIT WITH JUNCTION BOX FOR A CAT 5 CABLE AT EACH CAMERA AND A 120V/20A TECH POWER CIRCUIT FROM TECH SOURCE 'A' AT THE ANTENNA PAD TO POWER BOTH CAMERAS. Jupiter 2 Projects Ewe/Release. Generic Layout °ro"9" G1 0Archcentric A. n P.C. ■ M a ■ ■ BMAIM u c2 ii n c �. pr... We: Rafaa¢ FTWf1RK SYSTFMS 1340 9-05-14 ...o � .�....�,�, 42-0' SECUNTY CAREM MOUNTED BELOW UONT ON TOP CF 12 FOOT MGR POST ANTFMIA OMN IMgR.AM POSMCN Jupiter 2 - meter antenna layout Geneyout �' GRAVEt, Y DEEP OVER WEED BN2RER, TYPICAL GENERIC PLAN 26'WICE. r HICK CONCRETE WNUC FLUSH MRN TOP OF CONCRETE ANTENNA FOUNDATION ♦ FOOT WOE SY 6 FOOT HID1 LOOTING NOROONTAL 6LCNO GATE W MI NNW LdffACT O SECURITY SYSTEM NOT E%GEED 1M �LE1♦GTN-En��j� MEtER_SC1 ; _ --N�s •—GONOUNS GEDGYSTMAtTO T R25 6 FDOT FENCING TRUE NORTH SECURITY CAMERA MOUNTED BELOW LIMIT ON TOP OF 12 FOOT MOH POST NOTE: SECU ITYGNERAS REOURES A 1' CONDUIT WIM JUNCTION BOX FOR CAT 6 CABLE AT EACH COE. AND A 12O.0A TECH POWER MC. FROM TEEN SDNCE WAT T.E. ANTENNA P. TO POWER BOTH CAMERAS Jupiter 2 Projects nnc=.- u3 INN'"M` Generic D"p1 �Archcentric __- — NET WORK SYSt Lt1$ 1340 94214 - .. Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites Attachment D — Power Page 21 of 22 ENGINE GENERATOR BACKED UP PANELBOARD 5.6 METER ANTENNA PANEL SCHEDULE FN: C: \2014\21401-00\Schedules\(5-6 M Utility.XLS)3PHASE PANEL NO: UTILITY - 5.6 METER ANTENNA 03-Sep-14 LOCATION: ANTENNA VOLTAGE L-L: 208 PROJECT: HNS - JUPITER 2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS VOLTAGE L-G: 120 JOB NO.: 21401.00 TYPE: NEMA 4 COMMENTS: SQUARE D - NQ SERIES BUS RATING: 125 AMP S.C.RMS RATING: 10 KAIC MAIN O.C. DEVICE: 125 AMP MCB MOUNTING: UNI-STRUT CIR DEVICE CONNECTED DEMAND LOAD LOAD DEMAND CONNECTED DEVICE CIR NO. AMPS POLE VA FACTOR SERVED SERVED FACTOR VA POLE AMPS NO. 1 20 3 933 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR LOW TEMP KIT 1.00 70 2 10 2 3 20 3 933 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR LOW TEMP KIT 1.00 70 2 10 4 5 20 3 934 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR HUB HEATER 1.25 2000 2 30 * 6 7 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR HUB HEATER 1.25 2000 2 30 * 8 9 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR FEED HEATER 1.25 122 1 15 * 10 11 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR AIRCRAFT WARNING LIGHT 1.25 116 1 10 12 13 60 3 6000 1.25 DE-ICE CONTROLLER ANTENNA LIGHTING & RECP 1.00 430 1 15 14 15 60 3 6000 1.25 DE-ICE CONTROLLER SPARE 1 20 16 17 60 3 6000 1.25 DE-ICE CONTROLLER SPACE 18 19 SPACE SPACE 20 21 SPACE SPACE 22 23 SPACE SPACE 24 CONNECTED LOAD: DEMAND LOAD: PH A VA = 10,700 PH A VA = 12,933 PH B VA = 8,392 PH B VA = 10,156 PH C VA = 10,317 PH C VA = 12,580 TOTAL VA = 29,409 TOTAL VA = 35,669 TOTAL AMPS = 99.01 NOTES: 1. VERIFY FAULT CURRENT. 2. * - DENOTES GFI CIRCUIT BREAKER. 3. ANTENNA LIGHTING LOAD IS BASED ON TWO (2) 100 WATT METAL HALIDE LAMPS. ENGINE GENERATOR BACKED UP PANELBOARD 5.6 METER ANTENNA WITHOUT DE-ICING PANEL SCHEDULE FN: C:\2014\21401-00\Schedules\(5-6 M Utility -No De-Ice.XLS]3PHASE PANEL NO: UTILITY - 5.6 METER ANTENNA 31-Ju1-14 LOCATION: ANTENNA VOLTAGE L-L: 208 PROJECT: FINS - JUPITER 2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS VOLTAGE L-G: 120 JOB NO.: 21401.00 TYPE: NEMA 4 COMMENTS: SQUARE D - NQ SERIES BUS RATING: 60 AMP S.C.RMS RATING: 10 KAIC MAIN 0.C. DEVICE: 60 AMP MCB MOUNTING: UNI-STRUT CIR DEVICE CONNECTED DEMAND LOAD LOAD DEMAND DEVICE CIR ..ONNECTED N0. AMPS POLE VA FACTOR SERVED SERVED FACTOR VA POLE AMPS N0. 1 20 3 933 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR LOW TEMP KIT 1.00 70 2 10 2 3 20 3 933 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR LOW TEMP KIT 1.00 70 2 10 4 5 20 3 934 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR HUB HEATER 1.25 2000 2 30 * 6 7 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR HUB HEATER 1.25 2000 2 30 * 8 9 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR FEED HEATER 1.25 122 1 15 * 10 11 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR AIRCRAFT WARNING LIGHT 1.25 116 1 10 12 13 SPACE ANTENNA LIGHTING & RECP 1.00 430 1 15 14 15 SPACE SPARE 1 20 16 17 SPACE SPACE 18 19 SPACE SPACE 20 21 SPACE SPACE 22 23 SPACE SPACE 24 CONNECTED LOAD: DEMAND LOAD: PH A VA = 4,700 PH A VA = 5,433 PH B VA = 2,392 PH B VA = 2,656 PH C VA = 4,317 PH C VA = 5,080 TOTAL VA = 11,409 TOTAL VA = 13,169 TOTAL AMPS = 36.55 NOTES: 1. VERIFY FAULT CURRENT. 2. * - DENOTES GPI CIRCUIT BREAKER. 3. ANTENNA LIGHTING LOAD IS BASED ON TWO (2) 100 WATT METAL HALIDE LAMPS. ENGINE GENERATOR BACKED UP PANELBOARD 8.1 METER ANTENNA PANEL SCHEDULE FN: C:12014121401-00\Schedulesl(8-1 M Utility.XLS)3PHASE PANEL NO: UTILITY - 8.1 METER ANTENNA 03-Sep-14 LOCATION: ANTENNA VOLTAGE L-L: 208 PROJECT: HNS - JUPITER 2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS VOLTAGE L-G: 120 JOB NO.: 21401.00 TYPE: NEMA 4 COMMENTS, SQUARE D•- NO SERIES BUS RATING: 225 AMP S.C.RMS RATING: 10 KAIC MAIN O.C. DEVICE: 175 AMP MCB MOUNTING: UNI-STRUT CIR DEVICE CONNECTED DEMAND LOAD LOAD DEMAND CONNECTED DEVICE CIR NO. AMPS POLE VA FACTOR SERVED SERVED FACTOR VA POLE AMPS NO. 1 80 3 5900 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR LOW TEMP KIT 1.00 70 2 10 2 3 80 3 5900 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR LOW TEMP KIT 1.00 70 2 10 4 5 80 3 5900 1.25 ANTENNA DRIVE MOTOR HUB HEATER 1.25 2000 2 30 • 6 7 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR HUB HEATER 1.25 2000 2 30 * 8 9 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR PEED HEATER 1.25 154 1 15 * 10 11 20 3 1267 1.00 PRECIP DEVIATOR AIRCRAFT WARNING LIGHT 1.25 116 1 10 12 13 60 3 6000 1.25 DE-ICE CONTROLLER ANTENNA LIGHTING & RECP 1.00 430 1 15 14 15 60 3 6000 1.25 DE-ICE CONTROLLER SPARE 1 20 16 17 60 3 6000 1.25 DE-ICE CONTROLLER SPACE 18 19 SPACE SPACE 20 21 SPACE SPACE 22 23 SPACE SPACE 24 CONNECTED LOAD: DEMAND LOAD: PH A VA = 15,667 PH A VA = 19,142 PH B VA = 13,391 PH B VA = 16,405 PH C VA = 15,283 PH C VA = 18,787 TOTAL VA = 44,341 TOTAL VA = 54,334 TOTAL AMPS = 150.82 NOTES: 1. VERIFY FAULT CURRENT. 2. * - DENOTES GFI CIRCUIT BREAKER. 3. ANTENNA LIGHTING LOAD IS BASED ON TWO (2) 100 WATT METAL HALIDE LAMPS. UPS TECH "A" PANELBOARD PANEL SCHEDULE FN: C.12014121401-001SchedAesYlbch A.XLSJIPHASE PANEL N0: TECH A 30-J81-14 CIR NO. 2 4 6 8 10 12 LOCATION: ANTENNA PROTECT: HNS - JUPITER 2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS JOB NO.: 21401.00 COMIENTS: SQUARE D - NQ SERIES VOLTAGE L-L: VOLTAGE L-G: TYPE: 208 120 NEMA 4 BUS RATING: 60 AMPS MAIN O.C. DEVICE: 40 AMPS MOUNTING: UNI-STRUT S.C.RMS RATING: 10 1(AIC CIR DEVICE CONNECTED DEMAND LOAD NO. AMPS POLE VA FACTOR SERVED LOAD SERVED DEMAND FACTOR CONNECTED VA POLE 2 2 2 2 1 DEVICE AMPS 10 10 15 15 20 1 30 2 1900 1.25 ANTENNA PDU A 4 PDU C 3 30 2 1900 1.25 ANTENNA PDU A & PDU C 5 SPACE 7 SPACE 9 SPACE 11 SPACE FAN/VENT KIT FAN/VENT KIT ANTENNA DRIVE CONTROL ANTENNA DRIVE CONTROL SPARE SPACE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 106 106 950 950 CONNECTED LOAD: TOTAL PHASE A . 2,956 VA TOTAL PHASE B . 2,956 VA TOTAL LOAD . 5,912 VA DEMAND LOAD: TOTAL PHASE A . TOTAL PHASE B . TOTAL LOAD . TOTAL LOAD . 3,431 3,431 6,862 32.99 VA VA VA AMPS NOTES: 1. VERIFY FAULT CURRENT. 2. ANTENNA PDU C - FED VIA A AUTOMATIC STATIC TRANSFER SWITCH; LOAD IS SHOWN ON BOTH PANELS. UPS TECH "B" PANELBOARD PANEL SCHEDULE FN: C:12014121401-001Schedulesl(Tech BXLSJIPHASE PANEL NO: TECH B 30-J111-14 CIR NO. 2 4 6 B 10 12 LOCATION: ANTENNA PROJECT: HNS - JUPITER 2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS JOB NO.: 21401.00 COMMENTS: SQUARE D - NQ SERIES VOLTAGE L-L: VOLTAGE L-G: TYPE: 208 120 NEMA 4 BUS RATING: 60 AMPS MAIN 0.C. DEVICE: 40 AMPS MOUNTING: UNI-STRUT S.C.RMS RATING: 10 KAIC CIR DEVICE CONNEDEMAND LOAD N0. AMPS POLE VA FACTOR SERVED LOAD SERVED DEMAND FACTOR CONNECTED VA POLE 2 2 1 DEVICE AMPS 10 10 20 1 30 2 1900 1.25 ANTENNA PDU B L PDU C 3 30 2 1900 1.25 ANTENNA PDU B & PDU C 5 SPACE 7 SPACE 9 SPACE 11 SPACE FAN/VENT KIT FAN/VENT KIT TWO SECURITY CAMERAS SPACE SPACE SPACE 1.00 1.00 1.00 106 106 1506 CONNECTED LOAD: TOTAL PHASE A . 3,506 VA TOTAL PHASE B - 2,006 VA TOTAL LOAD - 5,512 VA DEMAND LOAD: TOTAL PHASE A . TOTAL PHASE B s TOTAL LOAD . TOTAL LOAD - 3,981 2,481 6,462 31.07 VA VA VA AMPS NOTES: 1. VERIFY FAULT CURRENT. 2. ANTENNA PDU C - FED VIA A AUTOMATIC STATIC TRANSFER SWITCH; LOAD IS SHOWN ON BOTH PANELS. Satellite Antenna Systems Installation Information for Jupiter Sites Attachment E — Surge Arrestor Cabinet Page 22 of 22 SCE I Part Information - SCE-604818FSD Page 1 of 2 SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING Your Enclosure Source Saginaw Control & Engineering 95 Midland Road Saginaw, MI 48638-5770 Phone: (800)234-6871 Fax: (989)799-4524 http://www.saginawcontrol.com Part Information - SCE-604818FSD SCE-604818FSD Application - Designed to house a variety of electrical and electronic controls and instruments. Provisions for optional surface mounting or rack mounting of almost any type of equipment. Provides protection from dust, dirt, water and oil. The enclosures are extra deep for applications requiring more interior space. Construction - • 0.104" carbon steel. • Removable and interchangeable doors. • Concealed hinge. • Seams continuously welded and ground smooth, no holes or knockouts. • Strong, rigid construction with stiffeners welded on backs of single access boxes. • Lifting eyes for easy handling. • Black zinc die cast keylocking/padlocking handle. • 3-point latching mechanism. • Latch rods have ramp shoes for easier door closing. • Flange trough collar around all sides of door opening. • Removable print pocket provided on door. • Mounting channels welded horizontally on sides of interior body at top, bottom and middle for mounting optional panels or rack mounting angles. • Oil resistant gasket. • Ground stud on door. • Provisions for fluorescent light kit. Finish - White powder coat inside and ANSI-61 gray outside. Optional subpanels are powder coated white. Industry Standards - (IS3) NEMA Type 3R, 12 and Type 13 UL Listed Type 3R and 12 CSA Type 3R and 12 IEC 60529 IP 55 Notes - Special Instructions apply for IS3, IS4 and IS6 to maintain the environmental rating of Type 3R for these parts. Instructions are located on the enclosure door. Drip shield is required on IS3, drip shield is recommended on IS4 and IS6. Drain holes are required on all. Product Specifications - Part Number: SCE- 604818FSD Description: FSD Enclosure Height: 60.00" Width: 48.00" Depth: 18.00" Price Code: A2 List Price: $1,717.47 Catalog Page: 106 Est. Ship Weight: 372.00 lbs Body Stiffeners D: 20.00 Body Stiffeners E: 19.88 Download CAD Package Add to Bill of Material Optional Accessories - SCE-14RMW - Wireway, Removable SCE-60FSCPS - Support, Center Panel SCE-60FSCS - Support, Center Panel SCE-60FSHDPS - Panel, Support Heavy Duty **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-60P24F1 - Subpanel, Full **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-60P24F2 - Subpanel, Half **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-60P48F1 - Subpanel, Full SCE-60RA19TH - Angle, Rack **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-60RP24F6 - Angle, Rack **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-60SMP14 - Subpanel, Side Mount **Cannot be used when other panels are installed. SCE-72P24F2 - Subpanel, Half **Requires heavy duty pane! support & center panel support (SCE- 60FSHDPS & SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-72P48F2 - Subpanel, Half **Requires heavy duty panel support (SCE-60FSHDPS) SCE-72RP24F5 - Angle, Rack **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-72RP24F6 - Angle, Rack **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-90P24F2 - Subpanel, Half **Reeuires heavy duty pane! supports & center panel support (SCE- 60FSHDPS & SCE-60FSCPS) SCE-90RP24F6 - Angle, Rack **Requires center panel support (SCE-60FSCPS) Similar Part Numbers - SCE-724824FSD - FSD Enclosure SCE-724818FSD - FSD Enclosure SCE-726036FSD - FSD Enclosure SCE-726024FSD - FSD Enclosure SCE-726018FSD - FSD Enclosure http://www.saginawcontrol.com/part_info/SCE-604818FSD/print 10/24/2011 1 '/:" 5'-0" Top View 04 9/16" C5 1 'A" • 4" • C1 Back ~►! C3 4-1rC4 4" 4" Front If 4'-0" Front View Top C5 Bottom 1,-6" 4'-0" 1" Camera Conduit 4" Spare Conduit 4" Spare Conduit 1" Camera Conduit Concept Drawing - Surge Arrestor Enclosure — Conduit Layout d40004r.eiCONSULTING ENGINEERS MARTIN/MARTIN HNS-Jupiter II Antenna Foundation —Tukwila, WA December 19, 2014 Martin/Martin, Inc #15594.S.59 ANTENNA FOUNDATION CALCULATIONS STRUCTURAL DRAWING, ANTENNA FOUNDATION Drawing S1 SITE -SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Attached DESIGN CRITERIA Tukwila Municipal Code (Governing codes adopted): IBC 2012 2012 IBC, Risk Category Table Wind speed map Wind Speed Conversion Table (V-ultimate to V-ASD) Wind Speed Conversion Table (Fastest -mile to 3-second gust) p.1 p.2 p.3 p.4 Governing lateral design criteria (Wind governs the foundation design) p.5 ANTENNA FOUNDATION DESIGN Foundation design (ASCE-7 wind load design) pp. 6, 7 ANTENNA VENDOR DATA Attached MARTIN/MARTIN, INC. 12499 WEST COLFAX AVENUE LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80215 MAIN 303.431.6100 MARTI N MARTI N.COM CHAPTER 16.04 BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION Sections: 16.04.010 16.04.020 16.04.030 16.04.040 16.04.050 16.04.060 16.04.070 16.04 080 16.04.090 16.04.100 16.04.110 16.04.120 16.04.130 16.04.140 16.04.150 16.04.170 16.04.180 16.04.190 16.04.200 16.04.210 16.04.220 16.04.230 16.04.240 16.04.250 Purpose of Chapter Codes Adopted Filing Copies of State Building Codes Compliance with Other Regulations as Prerequisite for Building Permits Building, Moving and Demolition Permits Application for Relocation/Demolition Permit Correction of Defects Before Issuance of Permit Terms and Conditions of Issuance Application Fee Debris and Excavations Expiration Relocation Bond - Required Relocation Bond - Conditions Relocation Bond - Default in Performance of Conditions Relocation Bond - Refund of Surplus on Termination Additional Requirements for Security Devices Definitions Enforcement - Right of Entry Adoption of County Ordinance 451 Adoption of County Health Regulations Enforcement Officer Designated Fee Payment Abatement of Dangerous Buildings by City Procedures applicable to all construction permits 16.04.010 Purpose of Chapter TMC Chapter 16.04 is enacted for the purpose of adopting rules and regulations governing the conditions and maintenance of all property, buildings and structures by providing standards for supplied utilities, facilities and other physical things and conditions essential to ensure that structures are safe, sanitary and fit for occupation and use; governing the condemnation of buildings and structures unfit for human occupancy, and use and abatement of such structures in Tukwila; regulating the issuance of permits and the collection of fees; to help ensure the protection of the health, safety and the general welfare of the public; and governing the creation, construction, enlargement, conversion, alteration, repair, occupancy, use, height, court area, sanitation, ventilation and maintenance of all buildings and structures within this jurisdiction. The purpose of the codes adopted herein is not to create or otherwise establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially protected or benefited by the terms of these codes. (Ord. 2402 § 1; 2013; Ord. 2171 § 1(part); 2007; Ord. 2121 §1 (part), 2006) 16.04.020 Codes Adopted Effective July 1, 2013, the following codes are adopted by reference as if fully set forth: 1. The International Building Code, 2012 Edition, and referenced standards hereto as published by the International Code Council, Inc., and as adopted by the State of Washington in Chapter 51-50 WAC. The following Appendices, standards and amendments are specifically adopted: Appen ix E, ry Requirements. b. ICC/ANSI A117.1- 2009, American National Standard. c. Work exempt from a building permit. Section 105.2 of the International Building Code, 2012 Edition, is amended to include provisions regarding the following work exempt from a building permit: (1) Work performed by the City of Tukwila and located in City of Tukwila right-of-way; work performed by Washington State Department of Transportation and located in WSDOT right-of-way to include public utility towers and poles, mechanical equipment not specifically regulated in this code, hydraulic flood control structures including levees; provided that any structure or building constructed in a municipal or state right-of-way and intended to be used as any occupancy classification of the State Building Code is not exempt from the provisions of this code or the related permit requirements. (2) One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet, and such structure is outside of and entirely separated, as prescribed by Code, from any existing building on the premises. 2. The International Residential Code, 2012 Edition as amended by the State; provided that Chapters 11 and 25 through 43 of this code are not adopted. Appendix G, "Swimming Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs," is included in the adoption of the International Residential Code. 3. The Uniform Plumbing Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code Standards, 2012 Edition, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, and as amended by the State of Washington, provided that Chapters 12 and 15 of this code are not adopted. Provided further that those requirements of the Uniform Plumbing Code relating to venting and combustion air of fuel fired appliances as found in Chapter 5 and those portions of the code addressing building sewers are not adopted. Appendixes A, B, D, E and I of the Uniform Plumbing Code are hereby adopted by reference. Provided further that the following amendments to the Uniform Plumbing Code are adopted: a. All reference to and definition of "authority having jurisdiction" is deemed to refer to and shall mean the "Building Official." 16-2 Produced by the City of Tukwila, City Clerk's Office STRUCTURAL DESIGN i 1 structural system resulting from torsion due to eccentricity between the center of application of the lateral forces and the center of rigidity of the lateral force -resisting system. Every structure shall be designed to resist the overturning effects caused by the lateral forces specified in this chapter. See Section 1609 for wind loads, Section 1610 for lateral soil loads and Section 1613 for earthquake loads. 1604.5 Risk category. Each building and structure shall be assigned a risk category in accordance with Table 1604.5. Where a referenced standard specifies an occupancy cate- gory, the risk category shall not be taken as lower than the occupancy category specified therein. 1604.5.1 Multiple occupancies. Where a building or structure is occupied by two or more occupancies not included in the same risk category, it shall be assigned the classification of the highest risk category corresponding to the various occupancies. Where buildings or structures have two or more portions that are structurally separated, each portion shall be separately classified. Where a sepa- rated portion of a building or structure provides required TABLE 1604.5 RISK CATEGORY OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES RISK CATEGORY 1 1 Ill NATURE OF OCCUPANCY Buildings and other structures that represent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure, including but not limited to: • Agricultural facilities. • Certain temporary facilities. Buildings and other structures except those listed in Risk Categories I, III and IV r limited to: • Buildings and other structures whose primary occupancy is public assembly with an occupant load greater than 300. • Buildings and other structures containing elementary school, secondary school or day care facilities with an occupa load greater than 250. • Buildings and other structures containing adult education facilities, such as colleges and universities, with an occupant load greater than 500. • Group 1-2 occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more resident care recipients but not having surgery or emergency treatment facilities. • Group I-3 occupancies. • Any other occupancy with an occupant load greater than 5,000'. • Power -generating stations, water treatment facilities for potable water, waste water treatment facilities and other public utility facilities not included in Risk Category IV. • Buildings and other structures not included in Risk Category IV containing quantities of toxic or explosive materials that: Exceed maximum allowable quantities per control area as given in Table 307.1(1) or 307.1(2) or per outdoor control area in accordance with the International Fire Code; and Are sufficient to pose a threat to the public if released b. t of failure, including but not IV Buildings and other structures designated as essential facilities, including but not limited to: • Group 1-2 occupancies having surgery or emergency treatment facilities. • Fire, rescue, ambulance and police stations and emergency vehicle garages. • Designated earthquake, hurricane or other emergency shelters. • Designated emergency preparedness, communications and operations centers and other facilities required for emergency response. • Power -generating stations and other public utility facilities required as emergency backup facilities for Risk Category IV structures. • Buildings and other structures containing quantities of highly toxic materials that: Exceed maximum allowable quantities per control area as given in Table 307.1(2) or per outdoor control area in accordance with the International Fire Code; and Are sufficient to pose a threat to the public if released b. • Aviation control towers, air traffic control centers and emergency aircraft hangars. • Buildings and other structures having critical national defense functions. • Water storage facilities and pump structures required to maintain water pressure for fire suppression. a. For purposes of occupant load calculation, occupancies required by Table 1004.1.2 to use gross floor area calculations shall be permitted to use net floor areas to determine the total occupant load. I b. where approved by the building official, the classification of buildings and other structures as Risk Category III or IV based on their quantities of toxic, highly toxic or explosive materials is permitted to be reduced to Risk Category II, provided it can be demonstrated by a hazard assessment in accordance with Section 1.5.3 of ASCE 7 that a release of the toxic, highly toxic or explosive materials is not sufficient to pose a threat to the public. 336 2012 INTERNATIONAL. BUILDING CODE. w 0 0 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE/ 160(7 160(72) 0(67) 40(63y 130(58) r- • :ftliti rjlli/m ra/�/�.�■:i���frir4j:�ifiitf� 1'� M►M/� eir.� ► �r,.� r�iioi■!l`■ei pig l��ri ii�n};i:► '� �a+'b (� �+.. .a /r/lpjA ,q.a,.lkp apt .4 7t :S•dn�ii�i�� ��ii�- ■aal�rs�♦lt�„ �:��►t►►rli ►L:S�•f4�►�tiv4���x!"�'�i+f `■ 1!/ut.oa ■gsit�al.• • lit■ " ;,1-' ■+ g!�//1/ly� Arab a+■ �9gine 1�/i4r►tSsiuLa�„it,r. `�:I�i''i :%aI&l i/�httri iI ttr■� �a1iJ�4' i;, ,,1rlflt•■.allirra�a�+lta��?`i- Ill. N wrq/�r\ libmess a N_a■ r■4 greii ikraio 'Cal k�120(54) ,4674112.11 �ii� � � %war �1+g`ia�4� •�`1!1` �' r4 'MiN113 ✓ O. 160(7 ��� s�l�,rr 170{76) `}a 7%��7t►�. i 7 `'l \, 115(51)'14�tr't 150(67) 180(80) 120 54 4` "--'-‘4'.— �, 1�0( 8)140(63) 180(80) 10(49) 15 120(54) 130(58) 140(03) 67) Special Wind Region Locahon Guam Virgin Islands American Samoa Hawaii — �So�oial IiVp'nd'4aepion StafeAt%� Vrrph (nvs) 195 (87) 165 (74) 160 (72) 130 (58) 140(63) 150(67) 160(72) 170(76) 140(63) 150(67) 115(51) 120(54) 130(58) 140(63) 150(67) 160(72) • f=170(76) Puerto Rico Notes: 1. Values are nominal design 3-second gust wind speeds in miles per hour (m/s) at 33 ft (10m) above ground for Exposure C category. 2. Linear interpolation between contours is permitted. 3. Islands and coastal areas outside the last contour shall use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area. 4. Mountainous terrain, gorges, ocean promontories, and special wind regions shall be examined for unusual wind conditions. 5. Wind speeds correspond to approximately a 7% probability of exceedance in 50 years (Annual Exceedance Probability = 0.00143, MRI = 700 Years). FIGURE 1609A ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEEDS, V,,,.r, FOR RISK CATEGORY II BUILDINGSAND. OTHER STRUCTURES NOIS3O llfaf110la1S STRUCTURAL DESIGN TABLE 1609.1.2 WIND-BORNE DEBRIS PROTECTION FASTENING SCHEDULE FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS"" FASTENER TYPE FASTENER SPACING (inches) Panel Span <4 feet 4 feet < Panel Span <_ 6 feet 6 feet < Panel Span <_ 8 feet No. 8 wood -screw - based anchor with 2- inch embedment length 16 10 8 No. 10 wood -screw - based anchor with 2- inch embedment length 16 12 9 -I/4-inch diameter lag - screw -based anchor with 2-inch embed- ment length 16 16 16 For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 304.8 mm, 1 pound = 4.448 N, I mile per hour = 0.447 m/s. a. This table is based on 140 mph wind speeds and a 45-foot mean roof height. b. Fasteners shall be installed at opposing ends of the wood structural panel. Fasteners shall be located a minimum of 1 inch from the edge of the panel. c. Anchors shall penetrate through the exterior wall covering with an embedment length of 2 inches minimum into the building frame. Fasteners shall be located a minimum of 2'/2 inches from the edge of concrete block or concrete. d. Where panels are attached to masonry or masonry/stucco, they shall be attached using vibration -resistant anchors having a minimum ultimate withdrawal capacity of 1,500 pounds. 1609.1.2.2. Application of ASTM E 1996. The text of Section 6.2.2 of ASTM E 1996 shall be substituted as follows: 6.2.2 Unless otherwise specified, select the wind zone based on the strength design wind speed, V„,,, as follows: 6.2.2.1 Wind Zone I-130 mph <_ ultimate design wind speed, V„,, < 140 mph. 6.2.2.2 Wind Zone 2-140 mph _< ultimate design wind speed, V„,, < 150 mph at greater than one mile (1.6 km) from the coastline. The coastline shall be measured from the mean high water mark. 6.2.2.3 Wind Zone 3-150 mph (58 m/s) <_ ultimate design wind speed, V,d, <_ 160 mph (63 m/s), or 140 mph (54 m/s) 5 ultimate design wind speed, V„t, s 160 mph (63 m/s) and within one mile(1.6 km) of the coastline. The coastline shall be measured from the mean high water mark. KNS— Sta-1‘ s►-fie.. 100 V� 78 For SI: I mile per hour = 0.44 a Linear interpolation is permitted. b. V ds= nominal design wind speed applicable to methods specified in Exceptions 1 thro e' Vim= ultimate design wind speeds determined from Figures 1609A, 1609B, or 1609C. 120 93 6.2.2.4 Wind Zone 4— ultimate design wind speed, Vd, >160 mph (63 m/s). 1609.1.2.3 Garage doors. Garage door glazed opening protection for wind-borne debris shall meet the require- ments of an approved impact -resisting standard or ANSI/DASMA 115. 1609.2 Definitions. For the purposes of Section 1609 and as used elsewhere in this code, the following terms are defined in Chapter 2. HURRICANE -PRONE REGIONS. WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGION. WIND SPEED, V. WIND SPEED, Ica. 1609.3 Basic wind speed. The ultimate design wind speed, V„t,, in mph, for the determination of the wind loads shall be determined by Figures 1609A, 1609B and 1609C. The ulti- mate design wind speed, V„t,, for use in the design of Risk Category II buildings and structures shall be obtained from Figure 1609A. The ultimate design wind speed, V„t,, for use in the design of Risk Category III and IV buildings and struc- tures shall be obtained from Figure 1609B. The ultimate design wind speed, V„t,, for use in the design of Risk Category I buildings and structures shall be obtained from Figure 1609C. The ultimate design wind speed, V„t,, for the special wind regions indicated near mountainous terrain and near gorges shall be in accordance with Iocal jurisdiction require- ments. The ultimate design wind speeds, V„t,, determined by the local jurisdiction shall be in accordance with Section 26.5.1 of ASCE 7. In nonhurricane-prone regions, when the ultimate design wind speed, V„t,, is estimated from regional climatic data, the ultimate design wind speed, V„t,, shall be determined in accor- dance with Section 26.5.3 of ASCE 7. 1609.3.1 Wind speed conversion. When required, the ultimate design wind speeds of Figures 1609A, 1609B and 1609C shall be converted to nominal design wind speeds, Vard, using Table 1609.3.1 or Equation 16-33. Vasd = V„t, (Equation 16-33) where: V s = nominal design wind speed applicable to methods specified in Exceptions 1 through 5 of Section 1609.1.1. V„,,= ultimate design wind speeds determined from Figures 1609A, 1609B or 1609C. TABLE 1609.3.1 WIND SPEED CONVERSIONS° b ` 130 101 140 108 12INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE° 160 124 170 132 U?trokktW� I i 180 li 190 139 147 200 155 STRUCTURAL DESIGN where the basic wind speed is 120 mph (53 m/s) or greater; or Hawaii. 1609.3 Basic wind speed. The basic wind speed, in mph, for Ithe determination of the wind loads shall be determined by Fig- ure 1609. Basic wind speed for the special wind regions indi- cated, near mountainous terrain and near gorges shall be in accordance with local jurisdiction requirements. Basic wind speeds determined by the local jurisdiction shall be in accor- dance with Section 6.5.4 of ASCE 7. In nonhurricane-prone regions, when the basic wind speed is estimated from regional climatic data, the basic wind speed shall be not less than the wind speed associated with an annual probability of 0.02 (50-year mean recurrence interval), and the estimate shall be adjusted for equivalence to a 3-second gust wind speed at 33 feet (10 m) above ground in Exposure Cate- gory C. The data analysis shall be performed in accordance with Section 6.5.4.2 of ASCE 7. 1609.3.1 Wind speed conversion. When required, the 3-second gust basic wind speeds of Figure 1609 shall be converted to fastest -mile wind speeds, Vusing Table 1609.3.1 or Equation 16-34. (V3s —10.5) Vpu = (Equation 16-34) 1.05 where: Vas = 3-second gust basic wind speed from Figure 1609. 1609.4 Exposure category. For each wind direction consid- ered, an exposure category that adequately reflects the charac- teristics of ground surface irregularities shall be determined for the site at which the building or structure is to be constructed. Account shall be taken of variations in ground surface rough- ness that arise from natural topography and vegetation as well as from constructed features. 1609.4.1 Wind directions and sectors. For each selected wind direction at which the wind loads are to be evaluated, the exposure of the building or structure shall be determined for the two upwind sectors extending 45 degrees (0.79 rad) either side of the selected wind direction. The exposures in these two sectors shall be determined in accordance with Sections 1609.4.2 and 1609.4.3 and the exposure resulting in the highest wind loads shall be used to represent winds from that direction. V 1609.4.2 Surface roughness categories. A ground surface roughness within each 45-degree (0.79 rad) sector shall be determined for a distance upwind of the site as defined in Section 1609.4.3 from the categories defined below, for the purpose of assigning an exposure category as defined in Section 1609.4.3. Surface Roughness B. Urban and suburban areas, wooded areas or other terrain with numerous closely spaced obstructions having the size of single-family dwellings or larger. Surface Roughness C. Open terrain with scattered obstructions having heights generally less than 30 feet (9144 mm). This category includes flat open country, grasslands, and all water surfaces in hurricane -prone regions. Surface Roughness D. Flat, unobstructed areas and water surfaces outside hurricane -prone regions. This cat- egory includes smooth mud flats, salt flats and unbroken ice. 1609.4.3 Exposure categories. An exposure category shall be determined in accordance with the following: Exposure B. Exposure B shall apply where the ground surface roughness condition, as defined by Surface Roughness B, prevails in the upwind direction for a dis- tance of at least 2,600 feet (792 m) or 20 times the height of the building, whichever is greater. Exception: For buildings whose mean roof height is less than or equal to 30 feet (9144 mm), the upwind dis- tance is permitted to be reduced to 1,500 feet (457 m). Exposure C. Exposure C shall apply for all cases where Exposures B or D do not apply. Exposure D. Exposure D shall apply where the ground surface roughness, as defined by Surface Roughness D, prevails in the upwind direction for a distance of at least 5,000 feet (1524 m) or 20 times the height of the build- ing, whichever is greater. Exposure D shall extend inland from the shoreline for a distance of 600 feet (183 m) or 20 times the height of the building, whichever is greater. 1609.5 Roof systems. 1609.5.1 Roof deck. The roof deck shall be designed to withstand the wind pressures determined in accordance with ASCE 7. TABLE 1609.3.1 EQUIVALENT BASIC WIND SPEEDS•.°.` 3s 85 90 100 105 110 120 125 130 140 / '1145 150 1 160 170 r,,,- 71 76 85 90 95 104 109 1 114 123 28 133 142 152 For SI: 1 mile per hour = 0.44 m/s. a. Linear interpolation is permitted. b. V3s is the 3-second gust wind speed (mph). c. VV„ is the fastest mile wind speed (mph). 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE® Owe- U0l o v►t"arf3 Mi 51 Cr1 fie,, - (25 1a5l-(4. 144 293 r'»ARTIN/MARTU'J CONSULTING ENGINEERS Title Subject NNS Weal CMVeif5:� Conciu5ioyy5 Date 14! i Job no. 15594, By ?7,,efie— Sheet5 of OfrJvL VtintAiti ()fjo4J 4` c() in c_ fect- Ms7) tk o O2 IAAI� (v0 4. a5� amok. gAJ �V�►.� 3-�0�) s;-42de ce-eac 1^14 to vNA ()le-N � Vu 3-sec64) OWVI.Mrs VoMai Ue ` 1 c) r4 lA, i J C-f: ..2r; ' s (ID tc --Cv151c-dj;a" ) ctiv" ic04/ olk-t-iof, u --tk f-bo-u A bna- g e5 cip,,er c caJ cLilict iNo/tr _.....„....,.....______„ ____...„._ , w14 5; cZY I-Z/J S 4.12- St( 0 C.irCr Aa--% °i " SeJisvv L �1 t AL S �• 6 MARTIN /MARTIN QOw.YU�T.NO f. 0i. Project: HNS Jupiter II - 8.1 m Tukwila WA Job Number: 15594.S.59 Date: 18-Dec-14 By: Ben Nelson Page: 1 ANTENNA FOOTING DESIGN (ASCE 7-05) V1.00 USER INPUT: ANTENNA DATA Reflector diameter (DIAREF)= Height to Center of Reflector (H)= Antenna Self Weight (PANNT) = FOOTING DIMENSIONS / PROPERTIES L= W= t (below grade) = t (above grade) = t (total thickness) = f'c = fy = Reinforcing Clear Cover = SOIL PROPERTIES Soil Bearing Pressure (a5oi1) = Coeficient of Sliding Friction = Passive Pressure = WIND LOADING Wind Exposure = 3 sec gust wind speed (V) = Importance Factor (Ir„) = Kd (DEFAULT)= Kz(CALCULATED) = Kzl(DEFAULT) _ G(DEFAULT) = OUTPUT: ANTENNA PROPERTIES Reflector Area (AREF) = Height to Top of Reflector (HTOPREF) = DIAREF/HTOPREF (s/h) = WIND Velocity Pressure (qh) = Net Force Coefficient (C1) = Wind pressure (f) = 8.1 meters 5.00 m 5 kips 24 ft 24 ft 2.25 ft 0.75 ft 3 ft 4000 psi 60 ksi 3 in 2500 psf 0.4 fA55; et-e”1) re d 4 'AK c.e, Std.. IIJJ C Site Specific Exposure Factor Industry practice is to use "fastest -mile' wind speeds o1 125mph which corresponds to 142mph 142 mph (3-sec gust) Industry practice is to use Iw = 1.0 in conjuction with 125mph `fastest -mile" Unless Owner 1 stipulates voluntary upgrade. 0.85 ASCE/SEI 7-05 Table 6-4 0.98 Interpolated from table 6-3 in ASCE 7-05 1 Assume Topography to be flat 0.85 ASCE/SEI 6.5.8.1 554.4 ftA2 29.7 ft 0.90 42.9 psf 1.55 56.6 psf DtSIGN WIND HEAR = 32.9 kips Total antenna base shear is based on the full 'sail" area AREF = DIAREF2*(1T/4) HTOPREF = H + DIAREF/2 qh=q5 when z=h qz = 0.002561KZ`Kn`Kd`V2`I„, Interpolated from figure 6-20 f = gh*G*C1 Design Wind Shear = gh`G`C1`AREF`1.05 of the antenna increased by 5°b factor to account for misc. surface area of antenna support fegs. etc. WIND OVERTURNING MOMENT (Antenna Base Plate) = 540.3 kip-ft WIND OVERTURNING MOMENT (Foundation Interface) = 639.1 kip-ft Moment = DESIGN WIND SHEAR`(-1) Moment = DESIGN WIND SHEAR`(H-t) Project: HNS Jupiter II - 8 1 m Tukwila WA p.} MARTIN / MARTIN CCINSUay,Na rNOI arrnc Job Number: Date: By: 15594.S.59 18-Dec-14 Ben Nelson Page: 2 ANTENNA FOOTING DESIGN (ASCE 7-05) v1.00 OUTPUT FOOTING PROPERTIES SLIDING RESISTANCE Area of Footing = 576 ftA2 Weight of Footing (PFooTING)= Friction Resisting Force = + Passive Resisting Force = Total Resisting Force = DESIGN WIND SHEAR 2592 kips PFOOT NG = L'W't'(1501bs/ft^3) 105 7 kips 0 0 kips 105 7 kips 32.9 ki Sliding Factor of Safety = 3.2 OVERTURNING MOMENT (Eq 16-15 2012 IBC) O.61PFDOT MG+PANTENN) Resisting Moment = Wind Overturning Moment at Foundation Interface= SOIL PRESSURE CHECK 158.5 kips 19022 kip-ft 639 i kip- 1 Overturning Factor of Safety = 2.98 Friction = (PFOOTING+PANTENN)'Coeficient of Sliding Friction Passive = (W12)/2'Passive Pressure Total = Friction + Passive Sliding Factor of Safety. (Total Resisting Force) / DESIGN WIND SHEAR (Should be > 1.5) Resisting Moment = 0.6'(PFOOT!NG+PANTENNY(L/2) Overturning Moment = Vwind'(H+t) Overturning factor of safety = Resisting Moment / Overturning Moment (should be > 1.0) Load ID Load U2 Load'U2 [kips] [ft] [kip-ft] Footing Weight (PFOOTING) 259.2 12 3110.4 Antenna Weight (P„NTENN) 5 12 60 Total = 264.2 3170.4 Overturning Moment at Footing Interface= Distance of the Resultant (a) = U3 = 639.1 k-ft 9.6 ft 8.0 ft Maximum soil bearing pressure qt = 736 psf Minimum soil bearing pressure (q2) = Length on Footing over which soil pressure acts (3a or L) = FOUNDATION REINFORCING DESIGN Soil pressure at center of footing (q,en,)= + Service Moment on Footing (+Mservice) = 0.2 psf 24.0 ft 368.0 psf 353.3 k-ft + Factored Moment on Footing +Mu = 565.3 k-ft - Service Moment from Cantilevered Footing Self Weight (-Mservice) = -583.2 k-ft - Factored Moment on Footing -Mu = -933.1 k-ft Conservative Load (actor of 1 6 used on ell service soil Loads +As due to Flexure = -As due to Flexure = Asmin (Shrinkage and Temperature reinforcement) Section 7.12.2 = +Asreq = (4/3)'+As = -Asreq = (4/3)'-As = 0.228 in^2/ft 0 376 inA2/ft 0 58 in^2/ft 0 30 in^2/ft 050 in^2/ft FOOTING DESIGN SUMMARY L = 24 ft W= 24 ft t= 2.25 ft +Asreq = 0.30 In^2/ft -Asreq = 0.50 In^2/ft Asreq may not strictly meat temperature and shrinkage steel code requirements • • ♦ a - (ZLoad'x-MOVERTURN)/Load Resultant inside middle third. USE CASE A SOIL PRESSURE O.K. CASE A 01 1 2 7 (a) Resultant m madd'8 third 0t L (b) Resultant at edge o1 middle 02 of .14t -6a) 4 02•f6a-2f) t • when a- 2- al- 02' y fhod 2R, qt. 02`0 2R, 0 3o • Earth I Solutions NW«< December 1, 2014 Earth Solutions NW LLC ES-0312.09 Digital Fortress 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard, Suite 410 Seattle, Washington 98168 Attention: Mr. Kevin Teker Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Jupiter II Antenna Structure 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard Tukwila, Washington Reference: Sabey Architecture Hughes Technology Systems Jupiter II 8.1 Meter Antenna • Ceotechnica: Engineering • t onstt tine Mirrnhmng • Environmental Si_iences Hughes Network Systems, LLC Exterior Sitework Installation Information for the Jupiter II Gateway August 28, 2014 City of Tukwila GIS Geologic Map of Tukwila December 2006 Dear Mr. Teker: As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this report and geotechnical evaluation with recommendations for the proposed antenna structure. The approximate project location is illustrated on the attached Vicinity Map (Plate 1). Proiect Description Based on the referenced plan sheet, an antenna structure pad will be constructed along the west edge of the existing parking lot located west of the south end of the building at 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard. The Boring Location Plan (Plate 2) illustrates the approximate proposed location of the antenna structure pad relative to the existing building, parking lot, and slope. We anticipate grading activities will include cuts into the existing slope to establish the planned antenna structure pad alignment. Based on the referenced plan sheet, we estimate the cut to establish the antenna structure pad alignment will be up to approximately 10 feet. We understand a modular block retaining wall will be constructed to support the cut into the adjacent slope. 1805 1361h Place N E., Suite 201 • Bellevue \\A 9800', • (125 4 49-4704 • FAX (425) 44c1-4711 Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 ES-0312.09 Page 2 We understand the maximum vertical load from the antenna structure will be 3 kips. If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to verify the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report have been incorporated into the plans. Subsurface Conditions As part of the subsurface exploration, two borings were advanced within the proposed antenna structure pad location for purposes of assessing soil and groundwater conditions. The borings were advanced to a depth of 21.5 feet below existing grade. Please refer to the boring logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Soil conditions observed at the boring locations consisted of medium dense to dense silt (Unified Soil Classification ML) deposits to the maximum explored depth of 21.5 feet below existing grades. Geologic Setting The referenced geologic map indicates the project location is underlain by glacial till deposits. The silt soil deposits observed at the boring locations is generally more consistent with pre - Fraser fine-grained deposits. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was not observed during our fieldwork on November 3, 2014. However, localized zones of groundwater seepage should be expected in the cuts for the proposed antenna pad. Site Preparation and Earthwork Based on the referenced project plan, we understand grading for the project will involve a cut into the existing slope of up to 10 feet to establish the proposed antenna structure pad alignment. We understand a modular block retaining wall will be constructed to support the cut into the existing slope. Temporary Erosion Control Straw wattles placed within the downslope side of the existing storm drain culvert should be considered to minimize sediment entering the existing storm drainage system during the proposed grading activities. Erosion control measures should conform to the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) and City of Tukwila standards. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 Structural Fill ES-0312.09 Page 3 We anticipate structural fill may be placed in foundation, retaining wall backfill, utility trench backfill, and parking lot areas for the proposed project. Soils placed in structural areas should be placed in loose lifts of 12 inches or less and compacted to a relative compaction of 95 percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D-1557). Modular Block Retaining Wall We understand a modular block retaining wall will be constructed to support the proposed cut into the existing slope. In our opinion, an Ultra Block gravity wall would be a suitable retaining wall system to support the proposed cut. A modular block wall design and design calculations are provided as attachments to this letter. In our opinion, the proposed temporary cut for the modular block wall can be sloped at an inclination of 0.5H:1V. ESNW should observe the temporary cut to confirm soil conditions and stability. Foundations Based on the results of our study, the proposed antenna structure can be supported on a structural mat foundation bearing on 12 inches of one and one -quarter inch clean crushed rock underlain by competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or structural fill. Competent soils suitable for support of the antenna structure pad should be encountered at a depth of approximately one and one-half to three below existing grades at the proposed pad location. Where loose, organic or other unsuitable materials are encountered at or below the foundation subgrade elevation, the material should be removed and replaced with structural fill or crushed rock, as necessary. Provided the antenna structure will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be used for design of the structural mat foundation: • Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf • Passive earth pressure 300 pcf (equivalent fluid) • Coefficient of friction 0.40 • Modulus of subgrade reaction 300 pci A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 ES-0312.09 Page 4 Seismic Considerations The 2012 IBC recognizes ASCE for seismic site class definitions. If the project will be permitted under the 2012 IBC, in accordance with Table 20.3-1 of ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Site Class D, should be used fot design. Utility Trench Support and Backfill in our opinion, the native silt soils observed at the boring locations are generally suitable for support of utilities. In general, the native silt soils observed at the boring locations should be suitable for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, provided the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Due to the high fines content of the native silt soils, we do not recommend using the native silt soils as structure fill during wet weather conditions. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable requirements of the City of Tukwila. Limitations The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the boring locations may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 ES-0312.09 Page 5 We trust this report meets your current needs. Should you have questions, or if additional information is required, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Henry T. Wright, E.I.T. Staff Engineer i Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Principal Attachments: Vicinity Map — Plate 1 Boring Location Plan — Plate 2 Boring Logs Grain Size Distribution Modular Block Wall Design and Notes — Sheet W1 Modular Block Wall Calculations Earth Solutions NW, LLC 4 ; P4.4.110V, It rim ••• FS CL9VER() fir."%,41 L4T.I, cip .0 • "144 t.- ..^v s1 or: Vt D VI S I t 6TH fp! ,1 1: < tire irt •f ' Jy C'•:•a IVA • I - •• • • iv .„ • 5 r •c: ..1:PLT.; chnlirA le I 1.;57.11' GO ilS 112Til le •' 1 14 rth7.. V.1 es "TO 5 ••• •"7151'eari j. • cc: INTirr " ht1•111.1 Z‘1.171: I 4r• Reference: King County, Washington Map 625 By The Thomas Guide Rand McNally 32nd Edition NORTH P\6 NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. LW tr* r- 'If • 51 14n; 1.. r t.•114.. r. • I 1' urrr. si s c.c• • ; IT rma sr • • 1.1.tritr tin.6 • WR1 4t ; E fl SH soCINI2 • • ' *To" 4- ••• • .11 -al 71 IP SrX., • Earth r :al) Solutions \Wile, 1 :'..:414113 i.t. Bier:. tions NWLLC onstruction Monitoring ental Sciences Vicinity Map Jupiter II Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 11/20/2014 Proj. No. 0312.09 Checked HTW Date Nov. 2014 Plate 1 Proposed Antenna Existing Building LEGEND — --Approximate Location of B-1 ESNW Boring, Proj. No. ES-0312.09, Nov. 2014 nProposed Structure Existing Building NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and / or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Property Line Proposed Block Wall NORTH Not - To - Scale Construction Monitoring ental Sciences Boring Location Plan Jupiter II Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 11/20/2014 Proj. No. 0312.09 Checked HTW Date Nov. 2014 Plate 2 Earth Solutions NWLLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER GRAVEL AND G SOILSLY CLEAN GRAVELS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) .4. •di. I!� bilk b, •e S .* S GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES ° O°o 30 to ,O o ,O 0. DC 0 GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE GRAVELS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) ' ' �► •° 3O tS a,11 1 d GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURES =rr d 41G •ram �,�''�i t C' CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES MORE THAN 50°,6 OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN NO.200 SIEVE SIZE SAND AND SANDY SOILS CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) ,•,•,•, • SW WELL -GRADED SANDS. GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES MORE THAN 50%SANDS OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) SM SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES ,,..... '/j< _ SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES FINE GRAINED SOILS SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS LESS THAN 50 ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY ��� '/////��� / CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS GREATER THAN 50 MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS OH HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS '_ •' �� �'=,. ." Li: �� PT PEAT. HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. Earth Solution Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Digital Fortress PROJECT NUMBER 0312.09 DATE STARTED 11/3/14 COMPLETED 11/3/14 DRILLING CONTRACTOR Boretec DRILLING METHOD HSA LOGGED BY HTW CHECKED BY HTW NOTES Grass BORING NUMBER B-1 PAGE 1 OF 2 PROJECT NAME Jugler II PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington GROUND ELEVATION GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING AT END OF DRILLING --- AFTER DRILLING — HOLE SIZE IE: ov 0 RECOVERY TESTS U =0 a0 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 5 f 10 15 SS 100 19-21-29 (50) SS SS SS SS 100 100 12-18-21 (39) 12-17-23 (40) 100 8-11-17 (28) 100 8-13-19 (32) MC = 25.10% MC = 26.60% Fines = 99.40% MC = 24.50% MC = 24.20% MC = 31.50% Fines = 97.40% ML Tan SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist -becomes dense -becomes gray -2" layer of sand 20 (Continued Next Page) GENERAL BH 1 TP 1 WELL 0312.9 GPJ GINT US GDT 11 /25/14 Earth Solutions NW BORING NUMBER B-1 : Ea rth 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 'Solution- Bellevue, Washington 98005 PAGE 2 OF 2 NW i 4 Telephone. 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Digital Fortress PROJECT NAME Jupiter II PROJECT NUMBER 0312.09 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington tz _ 0 20 w a. I-- W a n < z CO o >- O 0 cc H D m 0> V z TESTS Vi vri D U e O 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _X SS 100 9 (54) 9 MC = 5.80% ML SP '� Tan SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist (continued) 21 0 2t 5 Gray poorly graded SAND, dense, damp Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring backfilled with bentonite. Bottom of hole at 21.5 feet 1- 0 z 0 Zvi 17) 0 O J m J z W : Earth 'Solution NMI Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Digital Fortress PROJECT NAME Jupiter II PROJECT NUMBER 0312.09 DATE STARTED 11/3/14 DRILLING CONTRACTOR Boretec DRILLING METHOD HSA LOGGED BY HTW NOTES 3" Asphalt COMPLETED 11/3/14 CHECKED BY HTW BORING NUMBER B-2 PAGE 1 OF 2 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila Washington GROUND ELEVATION GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING -- AT END OF DRILLING --- AFTER DRILLING — HOLE SIZE CL w 0 RECOVERY co O z TESTS 0 0 op MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SS 5 100 8-15-22 (37) X X 10 X 15 SS SS SS X 20 100 100 100 SS 100 7-7-10 (17) 9-16-23 (39) 10-20-26 (46) 7-13-16 (29) MC = 26.50% Fines = 98 80% MC = 26.90% MC = 28.30% MC = 25.10% MC = 30.80% ML (3" Crushed Rock) Tan SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist -becomes gray -oxide staining -becomes tan -becomes gray 20.0 (Continued Next Page) GENERAL 8H /TP / WELL 0312.9 GPJ GINT US GDT 11/25/14 Earth Solutions NW BORING NUMBER B-2 Earth 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 `‘,OItttion Bellevue, Washington 98005 PAGE 2 OF 2 hVI'l lc Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Digital Fortress PROJECT NAME Jupiter II PROJECT NUMBER 0312 09 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila1 Washington Ir.) DEPTH ° (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) 6) _U TESTS 6a. O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 6- ,, t SS 100 16(48,28 MC = 26.60% ML Gray SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist ( { 215 Boring terminated at 21 5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring backfilled with bentonite. Bottom of hole at 21.5 feet 0 -312.09.GPJ GINT U Larlh !Solutions Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: 425-284-3300 CLIENT Digital Fortress PROJECT NUMBER ES-312.09 PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NAME Juniper II _ PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER ir III i 111111' COBBLES Specimen Identification 5 0 B-1 5.0ft. o-1 B-1 15.0ft. o B-2 2.5ft. coarse I fine 1 coarse 1 medium 1 fine GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND Specimen Identification 0 B-1 5.0ft. rO B-1 15.0ft. L B-2 2.5ft. D100 2 2 D60 Classification Gray SILT, ML Gray SILT, ML Tan SILT, ML D30 D10 %Gravel 0.0 0.0 0.0 SILT OR CLAY LL _-4 %Sand 0.6 2.6 PL 1.2 PI i 1 %Silt %Clay 9_9.4 —1 97.4 98.8 SPECIFICATIONS [WARTY HALL CONITOIKT1061 DEREML A WAN WAS cans. al funWWqand conshcon al • orrery Mao., B•IA RoW9 WY 5K.m way., in so... w0e1w Nreefies.no man .•.0 8 Oa.OrdN.n.y wr5r a 0 in. D•dre, •N SA.e.o. Now. n B W. aalo..a.De•92WWa5m W. hrtW.9 and a.:a[•9 N•N.9 papa cr•May 40 - boa... NI . and 9Ww.lwn m N• ao'ND1Ga 1 cn00Q0 000 01.11 Caewa Nal nowt a maw E,S.,..r• LYnt•enn'a G2f ven. • N Mad N,a• pm r. nuwa9..5 mom omm+•ma mnl ▪ Mot .podorion and m. •5*fl deign OUALRY ASSURANCE A Con... at. Wm anal. Nay aemerNT•v pco ••••l0no on 05304 N W ..:w oral MM... one• 8. apaah. aa2Al.•. rye•m Iwo N. mai t•a.mWW. Ca0 tn•m.. and aphono Non.. NW to IN. Mren- B. 0.ew YWI ae..a• w• Irei.9.N.00 Ine•lnb n•.C)e, at • 1..re WY dua9 N•r'•va NO wag con.... open Nn• O+w •Nary ...ea pc.... net .A.w M Conoco N r••w091.1y a .Y pwcamnv OELNER*. STORAGE ARO NANOIAq A ConKaaor 0u• W. NI re. . upon *leery O auto. pw d. cane typo. V.a•.wbr..M NNW.. ,r ...NA. B Cont.. NY P*••c0 Y m0M0* from derr.ee are 0 A0 Ya wooer. as ▪ 400000•• 00010(.. um• ...nelevna D•n.ya ma.eMY •n•a na 0•Mt *0*0*0.KO0.•ot. PRODUCTS 01.11TIONB A MN..SON '• cony. reana9 w.5 •.n,.m.mMe. mtl•new PORM.n C.1.11.1.1. .JV.G•M. •T 04.4e4on of 2 5N • 5 OW . 2 50 B INlapo Fr 2anw..p"p•'a YMn. Goan CA. •N • .00*4.n Mn0 a. r1 070*•.0* (2Mr Goan C uNa BUA, NODULAR "LOCK RETAINING WALL UNITS A MOMu *8Nd Unlb 4M5 Pin." Who a4..9 a 040G.Y w00*145 Bond Caryanan Amos .11.0....y UAW, si mapos..orMwly egowm WW1 eon •On9a eed n+rr.d ngmmsela 8 Abnen B, l'.anan•b *.l oonfenn to d. r•a..m.ro W ASTV C1372 tSaneNd SOWraNNN 0 S n. Rearkq*YUraf C AbCMe Bock U.Y.la0wraorm a 10loWn e9 .Marv, e.O.Nnes.: 5orew.a n+nuod er • 40*0,0 r2 •aP'oa.:. M.n,+ae omyna,K OMIT • 3000..Mfao •0•apto, • 8% P.M. 10%n Y .m w<•11n aaON0 ways apvaw•v vi Nn•• 2 STI. 5 OW a25T) �re..9m • A)20 MAnT M00Nea0av, 0 Rae.. Boa Gpef•wN,..aaN.lNen erw.mn,rype pee.m.wea BASE L SW. COURSS 8ATERML A M.n•Y KW mw.l of SA+•O. MAuf 040.2.a Raw.em N•c•dre N.w. on de wn*WCOn drn•Y9e 48-B18LT CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES A veOw, A•Pan*K el 5 W W awc na '2-lool a0 8 Wfl Balr.rrlNbr 2 deprr etu4Nare•ear C. /NneI W Payment 01 5 • e.. we any 161. daa0. CO,rran. Pon. NA.re .T bol a 04400*N 4205* 0 nassen3000 anw.n •romana.`a Wr ...um pwl000AIRri CONTROL A. Tn• NM w0Naur; Owl W ONW .•0 q pr p•OMp b Eryn.•r en • h01- n.0 W T•.aq el d. wwMwtl 1re118 NM5 5. p•.15Tn00y w 0oov0♦4MI Erynnr. 8. AA•nNerMm.a.NY •aa.rfw.Nraua.04000 MANIC. en.0•c.n. .aaaM 00020v.i9. s rAwuon N d..rya•'en••n•. aleo5.eyvenN censprNmen. B.neN Aanp•Anw.e1 drew, a...9..N •prera•w DSWNAGE FILL A We Caanay7O UW*MNFt a! T Claw 0wrtW Rocs S ASE LEVELSND COURSE A ...51 a.0NNW... arca..nenn.an•1 0.00.8198.80.•n uNN Roo,. O Saop•d. Sal INp. Liming Cove• Wane •rue d one•c• 04. 1*4rw1 a S5%MON. wcea L .na., See ASTM Ot 55T .. l...N9 carp 2v.P.p•^Y0N1Ma. na m-Wi ao. Mn•ealaw NAM Low. UNNAa, 850 *34 NODULAR BLOCK UNO INSTALLATION FVn rw d I 0 BNa• •naa w pawa on no laveknp Gavee at v. ewlgraa are Veda. Air and Ml.n•S a www n Y darmm IN e.u. a1e one, w eh. mMo+N a.EW •r. Goon, awned paw er Mm nn0 Ne•-Iy rea Ow• naafi nA, a pe••e+e.:00.n ar,•wa Urea LiyOUI•0/ wnw• and a.,.+.• Ntl re n •¢atlYrw w4tr m•0a•0A7 • '1w:oa C Pyw.Iro mnip•a a+nea• FG w7Mr •N aer 07NA . Boa. UM FYvw a• or.Can W don.. Ia cboey wN Mack p.wrWa. O IAN ./n .a0•11 wo01 n.(E•. of LINA. B0c1 WY LArs• pr.r to un• O0A•O• 12 nra WO. pa00400 .0 owwetMn. nag na sawed two 19.o 151on; woo Rya lwreq ravr .Moon 5' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL no., Wn a truer TOP VIEW ENO VIEW "IRE VIEW MODULAR BLOCK UNIT DETAIL N01 p ALAS IL ' .w... carte- f0Wow 7.5' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 7 10' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL NOT TO SCALE '•'fit:�Jj.•S� :i i':v �J:�:�.,..: Boo 1.r•w...»NSW cAw a'.erwsw -11.0 WC w. 12.5' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL NOT 10 SCALE Project: Jupiter 11 Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11/25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 33 deg Foundation Soil: 33 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh y 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf Design Height: 12.29 ft Wall Batter/Tilt: 0.00/ 5.70 deg Embedment: 1.00 ft Leveling Pad Depth: 0.50 ft Slope Angle: 27.0 deg Slope Length: 10.0 ft Slope Toe Offset: 1.0 ft Vertical b on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 2.40 (Ivipd) / 1.51 Bearing: 2138.97 / 4074.28 Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10,0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 8.38 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: Name Elev ka kae Pa Pae Pir 1X 9.78 0.365 0.569 131 204 113 1X 7.34 0.365 0.570 524 818 226 2X-2X 4.89 0.614 0.911 2116 3142 453 2X-2X 2.45 0 511 0 735 3080 4433 679 1X-2X-2X 0.00 0.606 0.825 5883 8006 1018 2.83 / 1.50 9.54 / 5.01 - PaC FSs1 FoS OT siesFSsl i FoS Seis_OT 131 100.00 Id 00 , 95.58 4.06 524 100.00 10,00 I 34.47 1.60 1188 15 84 4.12 I 7.47 1.75 1433 9.46 2.83 4.75 1.26 1980 2 40(2 621 2 88 1.51[1.57] 1.50 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and shou d not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page u Project: Location: Designer: Date: Section: Design Method: Design Unit: Jupiter II Antenna Pad HTW 11/25/2014 Section 1 AASHTO_2002 Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 33 deg Foundation Soil: 33 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf 9.83 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 1.00 ft 0.50 ft 27.0 deg 10.0 ft 1.0 ft Vertical a on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 2.63 (IvIpd) / 1.45 Bearing: 1698.65 / 4584.88 Name Elev. 1X 7.34 1X 4.89 2X-2X I 2.45 2X-2X ' 0.00 Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 5.92 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: ka ' kae Pa Pae Pir - PaC 0.365 I 0.569 I i31 1 -204 ' 113 I 131 0.365 10.570 ! 523 817 1226 523 0.597 0.886 2058 3056 453 1171 0.499 0.720 13012 4340 679 1417 FSsi 100.00 100.00 15.99 2.63(3.011 2.84 / 1.25 10.11 / 3.75 FoS O_T 10.00 10.00 4.15 2.84 siesFSs! 95.66 34.49 7.52 1.45(1.57] FoS SeisOT 4.07 1.61 1.73 1.25 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and should not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page 1 Project: Location: Designer: Date: Section: Design Method: Design Unit: Jupiter II Antenna Pad HTW 11/25/2014 Section 1 AASHTO_2002 Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 33 deg Foundation Soil: 33 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf 7.38 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 1.00 ft 0.50 ft 27.0 deg 10.0 ft 1.0 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 3.12 (Ivlpd) / 1.64 Bearing: 1131.92 / 1970.15 Name 1X 1X 2X-2X Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 5.92 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: Elev. ka kae Pa Pee Pir - PaC FSsI 4.89 0.365 0.570 132 206 113 132 100.00 2.45 0.365 0.570 525 820 226 525 100.00 0.00 0.580 0.862 2005 2977 453 1156 3.12(3.99) 4.15 / 1.71 15.74 / 9.04 FoS OT 10.60 10.00 4.15 siesFSsl 95.25 34.44 1.64(1.89J FoS SeisOT 4.04 1.60 1.71 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and should not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page Project: Jupiter II Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11/25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 33 deg Foundation Soil: 33 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh y 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf 4.92 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 1.00 ft 0.50 ft 27.0 deg 10.0 ft 1.0 ft Vertical b on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 100.00 (fnd) / 2.49 Bearing: 639.36 / 1205.55 Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 3.46 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: Name Elevka kae i Pa Pae Pir ' - PaC 13( 2.45 1 0.365 0 570 f 131 205 1113 ; 131 1X . 0 OQ ; 0.365 0_570 525 819 226 , 525 . FSsI 100.00 100.00(100.00J 10.00 / 1.60 23.16 / 12.28 FoS OT 10.00 10.00 siesFSsl 95.33 2.49(3.51) FoS SeisOT I 4.05 1.60 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and should not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page 1 SED a division of CALIAN Ltd Revision 2 May 22, 2014 Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RF Terminal Facility Requirements Document 131721 CDRL No. 6 Prepared by: Lead Hardware Designer J. Franz Approved by Lead Systems Engineer D. Stensrud Approved by Project Manager S. Frattinger 18 Innovation Blvd., P.O. Box 1464 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan CANADA S7K 3P7 Tel: (306) 931-3425 Fax: (306) 933-1486 www.sedsystems.ca Contents i Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Identification 1-1 1.2 Scope 1-1 1.3 Applicable Documents 1-1 1.4 General 1-1 1.5 Overall Site Layout Assumptions 1-2 1.6 Duration of Activities 1-4 1.7 Customer Responsibilities 1-4 1.8 Version History 1-5 2.0 Antenna Foundation, Lifting, and Installation Space Requirements 2-1 2.1 General 2-1 2.2 Antenna Pad Layout 2-1 2.3 Foundation Design 2-1 2.4 Lifting Equipment 2-1 2.5 Installation Space 2-1 3.0 Cableways and Openings 3-1 3.1 Indoor Cableway Requirements 3-1 3.2 Outdoor Cableway Requirements 3-1 3.3 Shelter Penetrations 3-1 4.0 Environmental Requirements 4-1 4.1 Air Conditioning Requirements 4-1 Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Facility Requirements Document 131721(2) SED Systems ii Contents Contents (Cont'd) Page 5.0 AC Power and Grounding Requirements 5-1 5.1 General AC Power Requirements 5-1 5.2 Indoor AC Power Requirements 5-1 5.3 Antenna AC Power Requirements 5-1 5.4 Grounding Requirements 5-1 6.0 Satellite Access and Cooperating Earth Station Requirements 6-1 6.1 Satellite Access 6-1 6.2 Cooperating Earth Station 6-1 6.3 Antenna Test Schedule 6-2 Attachments 1 Foundation Specifications — 5.6 Meter Antenna 2 Foundation Specifications — 8.1 Meter Antenna 131721(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Facility Requirements Document SED Systems Contents iii Figures Page 1-1 Typical Overall Site Layout (for Reference Only) 1-3 5-1 RFT AC Requirements — 5.6m Antenna 5-3 5-2 RFT AC Requirements 8.1 m Antenna 5-4 Tables Page 1-1 Site Activity Durations 1-4 1-2 Customer Responsibilities 1-4 3-1 IFL Cable Description 3-1 Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Facility Requirements Document 131721(2) SED Systems iv Contents This page intentionally left blank. 131721(2) Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Facility Requirements Document SED Systems Attachment 2 Foundation Specifications — 8.1 Meter Antenna Att.2 Attachment 2 Foundation Specifications — 8.1 Meter Antenna Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Facility Requirements Document 131721(2) SED Systems 8 7 N01Et GENERAL NOTES 1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN IN INCHES [AND MILLIMETERS] AND (REFERENCE) 2. CONTRACTOR SWILL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS p LOCATING EXISTING CONSTRUCTION BEFORE FABRICATION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 8 3. GROUND RODS SHALL BE DRIVEN TO DEPTHS AS SHOWN (BELOW PERMANENT MOISTURE LEVEL) AND GROUND SYSTEM RESISTANCE MEASURED. THE ANTENNA STRUCTURE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO A GROUNDING SYSTEM CONSISTING OF A NUMBER OF INTERCONNECTED GROUND RODS. THE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS OF THE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES PUBUCAT1ON No. UL96A FOR LIGHTNING PROTECTION. THE GROUND ROD SYSTEM -TO -EARTH RESISTANCE SHALL. NOT EXCEED 1.0 ohm AT ANY TIME DURING THE YEAR 4. GROUNDING SYSTEM SHOWN IS THE MINIMUM NECESSARY LOCAL CONDITIONS WILL DICTATE GROUNDING SYSTEM DESIGN FOUNDATIONS: 1. FOUNDATIONS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO REST ON UNDISTURBED STANDARD SOIL (PER EIA-111-A 8 RS.222-D) REFER TO TABLE 1 FOR SOIL. DESIGN PARAMENTERS 2. BACKFILL SHALL BE SUITABLE EXCAVATED MATERIAL OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL COMPACTED IN 6' LIFTS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED 8Y ASTM 01557 3. THIS FOUNDATION IS A TYPICAL DESIGN ONLY. CERTIFICATION OF ITS SUITABILITY FOR A PARTICULAR INSTALLTION BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 15 REQUIRED PRIOR TO ITS USE FOR ACTUAL FABRICATION 4 IF THIS FOUNDATION IS TO BE LOCATED IN AN AREA WHERE THE ANNUAL FROST PENETRATION DEPTH EXCEEDS THE DEPTH SHOWN PER FOOTING THICKNESS PER TABLE 1(SHEET 2), THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE SPECIFYING A MINIMUM REQUIRED FOUNDATION DEPTH SHOULD 8E CONSULTED CONCRETE. 1 CONCRETE & RELATED WORK SHALL BE MIXED, PLACED AND CURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE' ACI 318 AND 'SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE' ACI 301, PUBLICATION SP-15 2 CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF AT LEAST OF3 [781 ATTO0 TIIMEIOT (FVPLA25 CINGIN .8 DAYS WITH A CEMENT SHALL BE MAXIMUM SLUMP REQUIRE TPORTAND HE SE OF (TYPE RESISS STANT CEMESOIL NT CONDITIONS 3. CONCRETE SUBJECTED TO FREEZE -THAW CYCLES TO BE AIR ENTRAINED 70 5%41% 4 REINFORCING BARS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM ABIS (51) GRADE 60 DEFORMED TYPE Fy = 60000 PSI (400 AIP9) 5. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCING BARS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF ACI 310 6. FABRICATION OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETAILING REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES' ACI 315 7 PROVIDE 3X4' X 45' [19 X 45'j CHAMFER ON ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE EDGES 8 A TOLERANCE OF 31/8' (3) APPLIES TO ALL ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT DIMENSIONS 9 LEVEL ALL PLATES FOR STRUTS INDIVIDUALLY AND TO WITHIN 31/4' (6) OF EACH OTHER 10. LEVEL PLATE FOR ANTENNA TO WITHIN 0.1' OF HORIZONTAL a 7 6 GROUNDING SYSTEM 1 THE GROUNDING SYSTEM SHOWN (SHEET 3) REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO ACIEVE SATISFACTORY GROUNDING. ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND SOIL RESISTIVITY LEVELS WILL DETERMINE FINAL GROUNDING SYSTEM DESIGN TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING NOTES BELOW 2. ALL GROUND RING, GROUND ROD AND ANTENNA STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS TO BE ERICOA PRODUCTS INC. CALWELDS EXOTHERMIC TYPE WELDED ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS OR EQUIVALENT 3. GROUND RODS SHALL BE DRIVEN TO A DEPTH BELOW PERMANENT FROST LEVEL (MINIMUM DEPTH SHOWN) AS DICTATED BY GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION 4. THE ANTENNA STRUCTURE SHALL BE CONVECTED TO A GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM CONSISTING OF A NUMBER OF INTERCONNECTED GROUND RODS THE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNDERWRITERS' LABORATORIES PUBLICATION No. UL96A FOR LIGHTNING PROTECTION 5. THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM TO EARTH RESISTANCE SHALL NOT EXCEED 10 ohms. MEASURED WITH A BIDDLE 3 TERMINAL DEVICE OR EQUIVALENT THE GROUNDED CONDUCTOR NEUTRAL) SUPPLIED TO ALL AC EQUIPMENT ON THE ANTENNA STRUCTURE SHOULD BE DISCONNECTED BEFORE TAKING MEASUREMENT 6. ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE LONGER GROUND RODS, ADDITIONAL GROUND ROOS AND/OR LAND FILL ADDITIVES TO REDUCE SOIL RESISTIVITY LEVELS 7 AVOID SHARP BENDS WHEN ROUTING GROUNDING WIRE. GROUNDING WIRES TO ANTENNA STRUCTURE TO BE RUN AS SHORT AND AS STRAIGHT AS POSSIBLE 8. FINAL GRADE DIRECTLY ABOVE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM TO BE WATER PERMEABLE CONDUIT 1 PRIME POWER STUB•UPS FOR Cl & C2 TO INCLUDE A WINCH [1270mm) PIG TAIL TO PERMIT THE FEEDER WIRE CONNECTION TO THE ANTENNA LOCATED LOAD CENTERS 2. CONDUITS C2 & C3 TO INCLUDE PULL ROPES FROM CUSTOMER BUILDING TO THE 8.1m ANTENNA FOUNDATION LOCATION 3. ALL CONDUITS TO STUB -UP 6-INCHES (152 Cron) ABOVE THE TOP OF THE ANTENNA FOUNDATION 4. ALL CONDUITS TO HAVE CAPS INSTALLED AFTER INSTALLATION TO PREVENT THEM FROM FILLING UP WITH WATER 5. INTERFACILITY CONDUIT BETWEEN THE CUSTOMER BUILDING AND THE 8.1m ANTENNA FOUNDATION TO INCLUDE SWEPT BENDS, NOT RIGHT ANGLES 6. INTERFACILITY CONDUIT BETWEEN THE CUSTOMER BUILDING AND THE 8.1m ANTENNA FOUNDATION TO INCLUDE PULL BOXES AS REQUIRED 5 4 CONDUIT SCHEDULE CONDUIT PURPOSE FROM TO SIZE INCH MMI NOTES CI UTILITY PWR CUSTOMERF pLOAD M ANTENNA A 109.E WITHOUTI t C2 TECHNICAL POWER cvT.,4,,1EFRRa`� FFpppNDA�I4ifl. (10 A% C3 SIGNAL/MOC ANTENNA CCUST�ONMM(kE'R 4(101.6) ALL B.IP IENNA C4 SIGNAIJM&C g8F.�1[{M,��� FO(J)4714)ION RI Hi 4[101.6( ALL 8•IMANTENNAWES 6 5 4 3 NA 2 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES INTERPRET PER ASME Y 14.SM.1994 rAck 0.1 .., n I 0.02 VIOAIE CONCRETE VOUNAE TAKE =ewe www.ascognol tom )NSTALL.FOUNDATION.8.1 M 1._,C1 4.•1 00I5 mho 1. LOGE oue I C.G1 C00, 0OCw..0 '. ,.uo. 0.5. ttop000061XG`Dli D 41TA9 7579312 ..1 NAF,Gn 63 moss •LE5 f161Y1 DM ... ...........n.....«...wt«.....1c60NlCA.wla MUSED TO PRODUCTION 04MAE14 3 2 1 11Y910R E NAN 101A e A V u, n 0 Leg 4 ESEFK Lii6E 2.2 Leg 3 aaa Log 2 Log Base k M 1K 1 N ( M FI E N K iTl Column _AIL9I o--: , o 0 oR 14Ool0iii eP o R V Z5GaO va 0 0 ¢ 0 �P g 3 0 0 0 4 p� 9i 0 0 0 1; e o 0 0 1 1 1 a 1 g f f S l l ""ill (2� y t000a lg oo og VC 00011 1 �1674 y7 i Qn uy ve §Sxeee1e$...aa:ooe$9Ykuoirgei e O e i V 1 O e e 1 ! O O 4 s N 9 P a i i ua v A O i; 0 G}}ufy Co le o git oaoiOO4 -G d Li• :... , '� o�geoiwg00 oEt:000$Gto00g:AE$fe.,i g ., 000iFfi000Oli000AllooasEasiij“j:a cooet a0eigl0ooSOgeo adllitslAei 000ll4o0eK$gooOS'4o00g3sR:iil_t AA g 00o'cl...i00oa k000t$g0osiiih regliZaa eootlleoo___0000glooR.i§ll»tfgsl3 ooa11$ooa114000ti7....§ Iti 4. li Qagriti000gat0000ligaao4ivaat, L pi¢ J V Cr. a 4 N 0 e 8 7 6 360 0 [9144] 360.0 [9144] —POINTING DIRECTION 1800 [4572] 48.0° 36.0' 96.0° 72.0° 76.0 3.0 J •914) [76] T- 8 10P OF SOIL 180.0 [4572] FOUNDATION PLAN UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL SECTION A -A rSOIL BEARING CAPACITY ' MODULUS OF SONUBGRADE REACU 'Aug 1 12.0 [305] [914 5 6.0 4 [152] '—POINTING DIR f 6.0 [152] C4 36. TYP C2 ARE 4.0 j [102] c CONDUIT DETAIL: STUB -UP LOCATION DETAIL B SCALE 1 : 18 4 3 (053.]) 1746 ALIGN PLATES TO WITHIN 22' OF AXIS MAIN AXIS TOP OF FOUNDATION I� 30.0 [762] 2 1 90% 9999-182 NULHEX. I.8.5Tl.GALV 2% 7579320 PLATE. ANCHOR BOLT. 8.IM �% 9997-177 W3H8.FLi.I .6.Si,GALv. I.063X2.50T&.1 /2 `\ 1 7.1 [Rio] 31.6 no([803]) [559] DETAIL E / SCALE 1 • 12 • • 15% 175364 ANCHOR BOLT 48% 9999.182 NUT.HEX.I.8.STL.GALV 48% 9997-177 W SHR.FLT. I.0.ST.GALV.1.063a2.500x.17 29.0 [737; 3.0 I [76] TOP ANO BOTTOM tTYYP BOTH D RECTIONSI FOOTING TH.CKNESS 2000 Pil 11oOkPa 100 KIPS/113 (15000 Kn/M3( 36.0 [9141 VOLUME OF T— WEIGHT OF CONCRETE REINFORCING 100 CUBIC YARDS 4.7010NS (76 CUB:C METER( [4.3 METRIC TONS1 7 6 5 2X 175368 PLATE.ANCHOR.STRUT 8% '75364 ANCHOR BOLT OUTRIGGER ANCHOR 4 PLACES DETAIL F SCALE' 12 SECTION C-C (ROTATED 90' CC W I CE8C?SI710r 1 NSTALL.FOUNDAT 1ON.8.1 M Www.oicspnal.com fYt c.54 C001 OOCIWIMb. D 4ZTA9 7579312 HOWL um a era nee .n lama, 1.1,mo.wwa.nawc ww caro'Aro+'ewnx vu1 actor Who,. n.no MC GWL E 3014 4 3 2 1 $ 7 406 [10363] 180 [4572] 0 • 24 [610] 7 6 180 [4572] 408 [I0363] ti 5 FOUNDATION GROUNDING SYSTEM maim n soft snat rwiss>t 6 5 7- 4 3 2 l 478% BURNDY MGAR6425 CABLE TO ROD CONNECTORS 03A' [191 %8 FT (2438) LG. COPPERwELO — GROUNROD 42 BARE STRANDED COPPER GROUND CABLE .....*<— THOMPSON P613 CONNECTOR (TYPICAL ALL ZAPS) M2 BARE STRANDED COPPER GROUND CABLE (TYPICAL( r.�300'17600MM LG GROUND ��//��//CABLE FOR CONNECTION 10 ANTENNA 1 914 MIN r// [9}] I wesignor• www.ascsgnal.Com 96-0 MIj!N TYP INSTALL.FOUNDATION.8.1M UGf CODE DfXuw.. D 4ZTA9 7579312 wrcc o-.,• oo-nc.a om.. .•w moon a Asc scw. CO.,D.AtW ...OD. mu,.+.ow ron.w.,wpm. vm.. ooD.nron AuOfsG+As. E .pf. 4 3 2 1 7 6 7 5 4 3 2 1 IOTFS. THE SYMBOL © INDICATES A CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS REVISION WHERE"17 IS THE REVISION LEVEL. REMOVE All BURSS AND SHARP EDGES DIMENSIONS APPLY AFTER PLATING. PERMANENTLY MARK OR TAG W1IH PART# & REVISION. V 1.25 11.25 175 16.25 85 01 13 THRU 9500 1.25 10.8 T "'Am MATERIAL TYPE OPTION AS SHOWN wall.: .TS1M1 STEEL G4021.44W OR ASIM A36 s 7 6 5 4 GALVANEZE PER AS1M At23 UNLESS OTHER W LSE PEC1F6ED ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES INTERPRET PER ASM Y14.5M-1991 TlpwWll MUG/. I,uC! t 0.1 ]]ucf A a 0.03 J,uct n,: 0.010 A•c,n: 1.0° \% E cant C nar WWW.OSCS19nW-corn PIATESTRUTANCHOR PUnntr,UR;A II3M EGO COX05082327 118 D CAGECOOt 4ZTA9 oocW n(O 175368 AL MIAm V 250 MMss: . LES ro]]a IM..�.�nA.atr•..f.IwfncwrAlcsvn ca+aA]a eel 'mew W.Mem w••t nrry try M.A./ 3 2 ]TARN I an I rrmow RELEASED TO PR000CROH 000EC10 B nu 1 01 e 1 7 I 6 I 5 b 4 I 3 f 2 I 1 IOTES . THE SYMBOL ® INDICATES A CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS REVISION WHERE "X" IS THE REVISION LEVEL. . REMOVE ALL BURSS AND SHARP EDGES. DIMENSIONS APPLY AFTER PLATING. . PERMANENTLY MARK OR TAG WITH PART# & REVISION. STEEL STAMP PART NUMBER AND REVISION LEVEL AIN I /A" HIGH CHARACTERS IN APPROXIMATE OCATION SHOWN e 7 6 A 5 4 7.5 SECTION A -A .4,0434 6 !ADDMATERIAL TTPE OPTION AO SHOWN wNsu. SA'INK STEE1 O30214MW OR ASTLMA36 HOT DP GILVARRE PER AST9 Ia UNLESS OTHERWISE PECFiED ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES INTERPRET PER ASME YI4.5M-1994 , MC! ,.1 0.1 r1Ace -x" 0.03 T Puce -33Ec 0DI0 A.Gn. 0.5 TOO moil NoiCCOO1 5) cEzvr sand. www.OscrgnOLCOm LATE, ANCHOR BOLT, B 1M WIMtr,1400EE IMMO, [DO 000005062327 102 D CAGE COOE 4ZTA9 DOCAWON NO 7579320 AemnAm ✓ 63 wss: • 605 lon 11rew1p Na NraNe.rlw P1•NN7 PNMI NW AONA O71WOO1 ./rN1ko tad torte oNab MrNN an Cn+t0 N.00&Ow_ 3 2 RA110 NM NIKON MIMEO TO ►E000DuoN 300E00 B ON] 1 01 3.0 Cableways and Openings 3-3 C6 C8 C7 C9 C10 AC Power r1rl r1r1 ri Panels (3) rdii1clicli rli11roc 'k1 11 11 i1 11 11 C12 C13 C11 1 Figure 3-2 Conduit Location — 8.1 m Antenna 3.3 Shelter Penetrations Penetrations of the Gateway building wall are required for the cable runs to the antenna. Any cable entry enclosure used for the cable penetration shall be provided by the customer. The cable penetration shall support the cables described in Table 3-1. Hughes Jupiter 2 Gateway RFT Facility Requirements Document 131721(3) SED Systems u Project: Jupiter II Location: Antenna Designer: HTW Date: 3/5/2015 Section: Backslope Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.230 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 32 deg Foundation Soil: 40 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh 100 psf 100 psf 14.75 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 0.50 ft 0.50 ft 27.0 deg 20.0 ft 0.0 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 2.05 (IvIpd) / 1.26 Bearing: 3181.53 / 11510.71 Y 120 pcf 120 pcf Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 8.38 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: 2.28 / 1.15 15.87 / 4.39 Name Elev. ka kae Pa Pee Fir - PaC FoS OT siesFSsi FoS SeisOT 1X 2X-2X 12.23 9.78 0.392 OA60 0.802 0.914 141 729 288 113 ' 141 100.00 10.00 68.72 3.00 1446 340 697 49.53.w�,_ 11.85 12.75 2.21 2X-2X 7.34 0.460 0.914 2.059 1588 3152 13035 566 906 1029 2015 17.70 10.58 4.62 3.69 5.74 1.18 1X-2X-2X 4.89 0.961 6088 3.91 1.59 1X-2X- 2.45 0.759 1.119 7370 10864 1246 2217 € 7.82 2.84 4.14 1.43 1X 2X-2X 0.00 0.657 t 0.950 9070 13105 1586 2459 € 2.0512.59j 2.28 1.26[1.59j 1.15 Page 1 u Project: Jupiter 11 Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11/25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.230 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 32 deg Foundation Soil: 40 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh y 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf 12.29 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 0.50 ft 0.50 ft 0.0 deg 0.0 ft 0.0 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 3.14 (IvIpd) / 1.71 Bearing: 2029.36 / 6120.99 Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 5.92 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: 2.82 / 1.19 20.96 / 6.95 4.89 Name Elev. , ks kee Pa Pas Pu - FaC FSs/ FoS OT siesFSs/ FoS SalsQT 1X 9.78 i 0.241 0.326 86 117 113 86 100.00 10.00 100.00 5.10 1X 1 7.34 ` 0.241 0.326 345 46- - 227 345 t 00.00 10.00 51.18 2.30 2X-2X i 4.89 0.416 0.532 1434 1835 453 978 i 25.18 5.67 11.99 2.17 2X-2X , 2.45 E 0.353 0.458 2127 2763 680 1191 14.43 3.83 7.16 1.55 2X-2X0.00 0.318 0.418 1 2966 3900 906 1406 ] 3.1414.251 2.82 I 1.71(2.25] 1.19 UltraWall r Page 1 u UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 Project: Jupiter II Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11/25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.230 SOIL PARAMETERS cp coh y Retained Soil: 32 deg 100 psf 120 pcf Foundation Soil: 40 deg 100 psf 120 pcf Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: 10.00 ft Live Load: 0 psf Wall Batter/Tilt: 0.00/ 5.70 deg Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Embedment: 0.50 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Depth: 0.50 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Slope Angle: 0.0 deg Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Slope Length: 0.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Slope Toe Offset: 0.0 ft Leveling Pad Width: 5.92 ft Vertical b on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 3.64 (IvIpd) / 1.92 FoS Overturning: 3.76 / 1.51 Bearing: 1480.68 / 2867.69 FoS Bearing: 29.80 / 15.39 Name Elev. ka kae Pa Pao 1 Pir - PaC FSsi T FoS OT siesl=Ssl` FoS SeisO7 1X 7.34 1 0.241 0.326 99 133 1 113 99 100.00 10.00 100.00 4.66 1X 4.89 1 0.241 0.326 369 500 i 227 369 100.00 I 10.00 49.97 1 2.18 2X-2X 2.45 0.394 0.339 0.507 0.442 1421 2113 1826 ` 2757 453 973 680 1187 24.76 3.64[5.23] 5.5 11.80 j 2.11' 2X-2X 0.00 3.76 1.92[2.64 1 1.51 UltraWall Page 1 Project: Jupiter II Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11/25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.230 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 32 deg Foundation Soil: 40 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh y 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf 7.50 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 0.50 ft 0.50 ft 0.0 deg 0.0 ft 0.0 ft Vertical b on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 4.61 (Ivlpd) / 2.27 Bearing: 1024.22 / 1501.84 Live Load: Live Load Offset: Live Load Width: Dead Load: Dead Load Offset: Dead Load Width: 0 psf 0.00 ft 100 ft 0 psf 10.0 ft 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 5.92 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: 5.79 / 2.14 43.86 / 29.91 Name :Elev, j ka Pa Poe ' Pir - PaC FSsI FoS OT siesFSsl FoS SeisOT 1X 4.89 i 0.241 0.326 95 129 1 113 95 100.00 10.00 100.00 4.76 1X t 2.45 0.241 0.326 363 492 ; 227 363 100.00 10.00 . 50.27 € 2.21 2X-2X 3 0.00 0.379 0.489 gmeggEggEs 949 4.61/7.321 5.79 2.2713.341 2.14 UltraWall Page 1 u Project: Location: Designer: Date: Section: Design Method: Design Unit: c. Jupiter II Antenna Pad HTW 11/25/2014 Section 1 AASHTO_2002 Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.230 SOIL PARAMETERS Retained Soil: Foundation Soil: 32 deg 40 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh y 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf Design Height: 5.00 ft Wall Batter/Tilt: 0.00/ 5.70 deg Embedment: 0.50 ft Leveling Pad Depth: 0.50 ft Slope Angle: 0.0 deg Slope Length: 0.0 ft Slope Toe Offset: 0.0 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 100.00 (fnd) / 3.59 Bearing: 639.36 / 922.55 Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 3.46 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: 10.00 / 2.24 54.20 / 37.56 Narne Elev. ( ka kae Pa Pae Pir - PaC FS& FoS OT siesFSsl FoS Se sOT IX 2.45 0,241 0,326 92 125 113 92 100.00 10.00 100.00 4.87 1X 0.00 0.291 0.326 357 484 227 — 357 I 1 0.00(100.00) 10.00 3.59(5.991 ; 2.24 UltraWall Page 1 W.} wlxYxwsl,9KxYx+*xtR 'R'Yrtia nNYx Yw.+ttNn4\la..u:»+fKxtw.u3.tyi x Woe°Nfn..wuf t41411 vmWl ta:ii , l.YNx1WtA.,V* %..w MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Present Datefrime: Tue Mar 10 08:46:58 2015 Earth Solutions NWac IOW. yawl e 1.4lo II/t4 44.1,94. 5/emas ax 1..r14MrrYraN Nfry Jupiter I1 C:\Users\hemy.wright\Documents\Earth Solutions\0312..10 UB\I5 Footwith. Backslope.BEN d .. :_..:...kt' .... -. ...,.�,�R...... �n«xxNtiw•. N.K, w....b. H`+:t%?eP:. Mr!'X;�!.!Jt.:-...... EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental Services, Construction Monitoring AASHTO 2002 ASD DESIGN METHOD Jupiter II MSEW(3.0): Update # 14.94 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Title: Jupiter II Project Number: ES-0312.10 Client: Digital Fortress Designer: HTW Station Number: Description: 15 Foot UltraBlock Wall with Backslope Company's information: Name: Earth Solutions NW, LLC Street: 1805 136th PI NE, Ste 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone #: (425) 284-3300 Fax #: E-Mail: Original file path and name: C:\Users\henry.wright\Documents\Earth Solutions\0312.10 t with Backslope.BEN Original date and time of creating this file: Thu Mar 05 10:02:00 2015 PROGRAM MODE: N...RRNW Yx.»Rt W11. Yl...»w,....ax ANALYSIS of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE using GEOGRID as reinforcing material. mar. .ftwoOmx. iNNaxrtt M4'P'1�.xs�t Na.Y\ww�»1}!YXxwfR1NYx AirnYRMYWYwxNlwlxfvrnnfeUi�1 iwa 1 Jupiter II Copyright © 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc, r.uuup'acv?^_x±4r;y�,>.)uw�•...lRwm•-v�aaRlntxs ,04 4 Page 1 of 5 License number MLNL-30I 109 r<ow,Ofatailmtn..n r......rx«,.,n.rxr..,,.r,,.aw,.w.,apras,., arrx� _....{ wage. ��»y.+aewxu.w,aaFa r.wwwrxx«.., MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Present DatefTime: Toe Mar 10 08:46:58 2015 SOIL DATA REINFORCED SOIL Unit weight, y Design value of internal angle of friction, RETAINED SOIL Unit weight, y Design value of internal angle of friction, 4 4 125.0 Ib/ft' 32.0 ° 120.0 lb/ft3 32.0 ° FOUNDATION SOIL (Considered as an equivalent uniform soil) Equivalent unit weight, y eQ,;,., 120.0 lb/ft3 Equivalent internal angle of friction, (0e4,,;,, 32.0 ° Equivalent cohesion, c 100.0 lb/ft 2 Water table does not affect bearing capacity LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS Jupiter II C:Wserslhenry wright\Documents'Earth Solutions\0312 10 UB115 Foot with Backslope.BEN Ka (internal stability) = 0.3073 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 15. Otherwise, eq. 38 is utilized) Inclination of internal slip plane, y1= 61.00° (see Fig. 28 in DEMO 82). Ka (external stability) = 0.3614 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 16. Otherwise, eq. 17 is utilized) BEARING CAPACITY Bearing capacity coefficients (calculated by MSEW): Nc = 35.49 SEISMICITY N =y= 30.21 Maximum ground acceleration coefficient, A = 0.229 Design acceleration coefficient in Internal Stability: Kh = Am = 0.280 Design acceleration coefficient in External Stability: Kh_d = 0.118 => Kh = Am = 0.157 (Kh in External Stability is based on allowable displacement, d = 25 mrn. using AASHTO 2002 equation) Kae ( Kh > 0 ) = 0.5223 Kae(Kh=0)= 0.3080 A Kae = 0.2143 Seismic soil-geogrid friction coefficient, F* is 100.0% of its specified static value. arrnrratare=177.177,==l• Visa. dia Jupiter 1I Copyright © 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, inc. n...�uacsa�..,setuaa...�++ieatxy,�,.xuurxa,�rs�mt:uarww�::us{a+�a>�a Page 2 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 trtwx#xPiiY�xxNAt Kr:�ar•k}xsn:`#.sr,3#x%A'iww.u# x1i.-..xx 4Mv x-../A OM iMWt lFv+ntYufEYx�raria: ...ee..#aagw w-...ssu�m.'Y.W�«.sadn;w k✓w+?Ow'nu k' } MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Date/Time: Tue Mar 10 08:46:58 2015 C:1UsersTenry vergM\Documents\Earth Solutions1,0312 10 U8115 Foot wills Backslope BEN t..,x vStS;Mw.1S41:24^Wreetse1i'.i„wtektee ti•te. t L..t...stes :. :Ys:tess.... x i.tra . j...,...._ s Yaset 5 7sses ... ?srty,?k.'nsastresa wes.leesztter,,Ns`.sety.,:' ase,i.w..« INPUT DATA: Geogrids (Analysis) DATA Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid type #1 type #2 type #3 type #4 type #5 Tult (lb/ft] 4700.0 5900.0 7400.0 Durability reduction factor, RFd 1.10 1.10 1.10 Installation -damage reduction factor, RFid 1.10 1.10 1.10 Creep reduction factor, RFc 1.58 1.58 1.58 N/A N/A Fs -overall for strength N/A N/A N/A Coverage ratio, Rc 1.000 1.000 1.000 Friction angle along geogrid-soil interface, p 24.00 24.00 24.00 Pullout resistance factor, F* 0.80'tart) 0.80•tanp 0.80'tani N/A N/A Scale -effect correction factor, a 0.8 0.8 0.8 Variation of Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient With Depth Z K/Ka Oft 3.3 ft 6.6 ft 9.8 ft 13.1 ft 16.4 ft 19.7 ft 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vora. 6.4411,zosowl.P1V 0.0 0 Z[ft]6.6 9.8 16.4 26.2 32.8 K / Ka 1.0 2.0 3.0 1 Jupiter II Copyright © 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. sw.xuxax.,s .sovavu.ozo a ."woctag000mwa.u.os scs suem • Page 3 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 v....ara»r.,...aaar.r<r,.....a...a. }...>. u.r.v...,aw.,avurn...aa.uavwn�srw»,..«; Yowl umv.,w.aa MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter Il Present Datcfrime Too Mar 10 08:0:58 2015 C \Userskhenry wright\Documents\Earth Solut on0,0312.11) UB I5 Foot with Baccllopc.BEN ..ra v.�.a,ry .arsrxv... .vsrrv,o,.,. ,.u.rr umvv...v xr.�r ..a.Y?!. xr� �-,,... w.0 v,�,.,?a r.Muw r_i..v.z• ....?^'Y..;F?F'+-„.k;...P .. §..,,?�aa,� r. k^?'..,."5,.'"}lw1E:..^.n.-..,. INPUT DATA: Geometry and Surcharge loads (of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE) Design height, Hd 15.00 [ft] Batter, w 5.7 [deg] Backslope, Q 25.0 [deg] Backslope rise 10.0 [ft] { Embedded depth is E = 1.00 ft, and height above top of finished bottom grade is H = 14.00 ft } UNIFORM SURCHARGE Uniformly distributed dead Toad is 0.0 [Ib/ft 2] Broken back equivalent angle, I = 18.43° (see Fig. 25 in DEMO 82) ANALYZED REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT: SCALE: 0 2 4 6 8 10 [ft] 17-7-7-771 Jupiter II Copyright ©1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. a;r�w.w�rsw�avavx.+a�.ua:a�w .zaas�c>Saar+rx:�a.s.�..ita+uxss,wi+twrw.�i�u�a.ut.i Page 4 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 -,sraa ...... I4.1.41,0C a...r...t .x>.... v...+.r+axi,.,...lr+zu.x MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Present Date/Time: Tue Mar 10 08:46:58 2015 Jupiter II C:\Users\henry wright\DocumentslEarth Solutionst0312.10 UPI \15 Foot with Bea -slope BEN ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Static conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 9.61, Meyerhof stress = 2557 lb/ft2. Foundation Interface: Direct sliding, Fs = 2.173, Eccentricity, e/L = 0.0537, Fs -overturning = 3,97 GEOGRID CONNECTION Fs -overall Fs -overall ( Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentricity # Elevation Length Type [connection [geogrid i strength resistance sliding e/L [ft] [ft] # 1 strength] strength] ; Fs Fs Fs Product name 1 2.50 13.00 3 2 5.00 13.00 1 3 7.50 13.00 1 4 10.00 13.00 1 5 12.50 13.00 1 2.46 1.73 1.726 8.040 1.712 0.0274 Miragrid 8XT 2.56 2.06 2.057 11.748 1.912 0.0030 Miragrid 5XT 2.74 2.57 2.574 11.019 2.158 -0.0209 Miragrid 5XT 2.49 3.44 3.438 10.465 2.459 -0.0469 Miragrid 5XT 1.43 3.95 3.948 7.918 2.807 -0.0828 Miragrid 5XT ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Seismic conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 5.41, Meyerhof stress = 3535 lb/ftl. Foundation Interface: Directsliding. Fs-1.411, Eccentricity. cJL 0.1655. Fs -overturning= 2.26 GEOGRID i CONNECTION• i Fs -overall Fs -overall ` Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentricity Product # Elevation Length Type . (connection [geogrid . strength resistance sliding e/L name [ft] [ft] # strength] strength] 1 Fs Fs Fs 1 2.50 13.00 3 2 5.00 13.00 1 3 7.50 13.00 1 4 10.00 13.00 1 5 12.50 13.00 1 1.63 1.49 1.487 6.414 1.153 0.1047 Miragrid 8XT 1.57 1.62 1.617 8.215 1.350 0.0520 Miragrid 5XT 1.69 1.97 1.973 7.439 1.624 0.0062 Miragrid 5XT 1.61 2.53 2.530 6.681 2.017 -0.0352 Miragrid 5XT 1.02 2.91 2.911 5.065 2.573 -0.0800 Miragrid 5XT YwwuK.e sl+NtkYr+"n. 'rt'fi iY"�'""""'�a w tSON-4 4'....;14 Wr.(Yi.nrY emak 3n My fig NW.��. • Jupiter I1 Copyright 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. •..+5�1..r«»>,5�r,:xw+�:u.iDxAir,w�.«uH#:sww�tk&..V. Page 5 of 5 License number MLNL-301.109 vx.rpanwx; Y«weaa aatw•w.wxsuntwaw,..,$ mr. a..,.aaa+xp...- ,.*: •ty-ssw•« 14 MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Date/rime: Tue Mar 10 08:47:13 2015 C:\Users\henry.wrighlDocuments\Earth Solutions\0312 10 UB\12.5 Fool BEN ! s r.111 ,....1:.- !..,..x«,.t!x+r.....,»w<111,.. 1,11.rz..wr11. 1,1.,,._: rt. +:...:n_..: n.�r*.»rs.. a+Azas. ,uvsrxr«w?sres*.1.?a:1.Y:...:_2>!111MYt.laMn..n,Mx.«10,re Earth Solutions NW iic FARTh SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Geotechnicat Engineering, Environmental Services, Construction Monitoring AASHTO 2002 ASD DESIGN METHOD Jupiter II MSEW(3.0): Update # 14.94 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Title: Jupiter II Project Number: ES-0312.10 Client: Digital Fortress Designer: HTW Station Number: Description: 12.5 Foot UltraBlock Wall without Backslope Company's information: Name: Earth Solutions NW, LLC Street: 1805 136th PI NE, Ste 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone #: (425) 284-3300 Fax #: E-Mail: Original file path and name: C:\Users\henry.wright\Documents\Earth Solutions\03I2.10 10 UB\12.5 Foot.BEN Original date and time of creating this file: Thu Mar 05 10:02:00 2015 PROGRAM MODE: a...,....,,, Jupiter 1I Copyright 0 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. s...u„alea ..w ar lass :.e ANALYSIS of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE using GEOGRID as reinforcing material. Page 1 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 AiiN[W.Ww1..Ai1M7; GYriAVOIC Olow�•.p1'k Vasa SM.YaV.JtM4sr««.1.111f'lwwltiM`rtw« Wt. Verm,...1'Yw«tA4qi YnrswI *Ma V-..1.Ar.werArt-OF `sw.-»it41"MN* 4NMriw.U.11'd iL.-tsuyx'Y'«wetu*P t L.er ..r«,r ri454\core PPM., tvnw t F• tx01.:• MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter Il Present Date/rime: Tue Mar 10 08:41:13 2015 C:\Users\henry .+arighziDoc.cmmnts\Earth 5oiutions\O3 i2.10 UR\12.5 Fnot,BE;N sa.nt r.,.MyK Y.,n•att !,11V,,.PPIY .717 ,, vw,v— 1•VT.i...n.t miar.JtN,r.'e...' Yrw, mn.itv..Ct , >,r . ."='".r.,0 slat\st R 5.. #_ ,...,....., fin a...5,......... SOIL DATA REINFORCED SOIL Unit weight, y Design value of internal angle of friction, RETAINED SOIL Unit weight, Y Design value of internal angle of friction, 4) 4) 125.0 lb/ft' 32.0 ° 120.0 lb/ft3 32.0 ° FOUNDATION SOIL (Considered as an equivalent uniform soil) Equivalent unit weight, y euuiv, 120.0 lb/ft' Equivalent internal angle of friction, 32.0 ° Equivalent cohesion, c w 100.0 lb/ft 2 Water table does not affect bearing capacity LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS Ka (internal stability) = 0.3073 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 15. Otherwise, eq. 38 is utilized) Inclination of internal slip plane, yr= 61.00° (see Fig. 28 in DEMO 82). Ka (external stability) = 0.3073 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 16. Otherwise, eq. 17 is utilized) BEARING CAPACITY Bearing capacity coefficients (calculated by MSEW): Nc = 35.49 SEISMICITY N y= 30.21 Maximum ground acceleration coefficient, A = 0.229 Design acceleration coefficient in Internal Stability: Kh = Am = 0.280 Design acceleration coefficient in Extcmal Stability: Kh_d = 0.118 => Kh = Am = 0.157 (Kh in External Stability is based on allowable displacement, d = 25 mm. using AASHTO 2002 equation) Kae (Kh > 0 ) = 0.3702 Kae ( Kh = 0) = 0.2705 A Kae = 0.0997 Seismic soil-geogrid friction coefficient, F* is 100.0% of its specified static value. Jupiter II Copyright ® 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. Page 2 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 YwN vMti \'•..Marty rwrnll pgvr w.1,00040 a"...n101004 ...l 10 , y....3a.y.(v,'S.01+N0000+1a.00..31avha'S'=.+�.aau MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter Il Present Deterrime: Toe Mar 10 08:47:13 2015 10 INPUT DATA: Geogrids (Analysis) C,3lJscrs\henry ssghtlDocuments;F.arth Solutions\0312 10 Un\12.5 Font BEN DATA Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid type #1 type #2 type #3 type #4 type #5 Tult [lb/ft] 4700.0 5900.0 7400.0 Durability reduction factor, RFd 1.10 1.10 1.10 Installation -damage reduction factor, RFid 1.10 1.10 1.10 Creep reduction factor, RFc 1.58 1.58 1.58 N/A N/A Fs -overall for strength N/A N/A N/A Coverage ratio, Re 1.000 1.000 1.000 Friction angle along geogrid-soil interface, p 24.00 24.00 24.00 Pullout resistance factor, F* 0.80•tar4 0.80•tani 0.80ttanp N/A N/A Scale -effect correction factor, a 0.8 0.8 0.8 Variation of Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient With Depth Z K/Ka Oft 3.3 ft 6.6 ft 9.8 ft 13.1 ft 16.4 ft 19.7 ft 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 K/Ka 1.0 2.0 3.0 01,14941.1 1.0 Jupiter 11 Copyright d 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. rw.uwlvtY:w„�cct..s.�ax+xzxYs:,c;�u�4%7taa;�w.?:N4ru�.wulnta, .. ... <: •. ,•, Page 3 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 4411114.1i arrsa.teaMarAar A .AX. u. MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Date/Time: The Mar 10 03:47:I4 2015 ,•a*. ronv.y�x ,, 'rov,vmr.�..: }!!, �,..'....„,.,!y?,'a„., .1.rm. i� C:UJsersTenry u-right1Dacuments'J rth Selutirms10312.10 UBti 2.3 foot. n13N INPUT DATA: Geometry and Surcharge loads (of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE) Design height, Hd Batter, co Backslope, Backslope rise 12.50 [ft] 5.7 [deg] 0.0 [deg] 0.0 [ft] { Embedded depth is E = 1.00 ft, and height above top of finished bottom grade is H = 11.50 ft } Broken back equivalent angle, I = 0.00° (see Fig. 25 in DEMO 82) UNIFORM SURCHARGE Uniformly distributed dead load is 250.0 [lb/ft 2] ANALYZED REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT: SCALE: 0 2 4 6 8 10 [ft] ',most; .1M., 4N.{Ww4'W Sy...* ...,...:41 nvYopooT. ivE^4 Y.aw. s4.#.ie> x mt artrMMx+,ww9, ow. tiw-rtr wel Fcva Jupiter II Copyright © 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. r«,.ra+ru+a+ a*A.rrr ,+44 arw Page 4 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 ryry MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Present Date/Time: Tue Mar 10 08:47:14 2015 Jupiter 11 C:1Users\henry wright\Documents\Earth Solution,\0312.10 UB112.5 Foot.BEN ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Static conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 6.48, Meyerhof stress = 2216 lb/ft2. Foundation Interface` Direct sliding, Fs = 2.150, Eccentricity, e/L = 0.1273, Fs -overturning = 3.19 # GEOGRID Elevation Length Type [ft] [ft] # 1 2.50 8.00 3 2 5.00 8.00 1 3 7.50 8.00 1 4 10.00 8.00 1 CONNECTION Fs -overall Fs -overall . Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentrici i Product [connection [geogrid 1 strength resistance sliding e/L i name strength] strength] I Fs Fs Fs j i 2.65 2.87 2.65 1.59 2.13 2.70 3.66 4.40 2.129 2.695 3.658 4.405 4.528 5.963 4.779 2.784 1.897 2.474 3.541 6.374 0.0767 Miragrid 8XT 0.0385 Miragrid 5XT 0.0123 Miragrid 5XT -0.0017 Miragrid 5XT ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Seismic conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 3.52, Meyerhof stress = 3163 Iblft2. oitndation Interface: Direct sliding, Fs = 1.452, Eccentricity. e/L - 0.2389. Fs -overturning = 1.93 GEOGRID Elevation Length Type [ft] [ft] # CONNECTION Fs -overall Fs -overall 1 Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentricity I Product [connection [gogrid ' strength resistance sliding e/L I name strength] strength] .' Fs Fs Fs 1 2.50 8.00 3 2 5.00 8.00 1 3 7.50 8.00 1 4 10.00 8.00 1 1.82 1.86 1.81 1.18 1.86 2.18 2.90 3.56 1.861 2.175 2.903 3.565 3.691 4.328 3.388 2.029 1.306 1.752 2.624 5.140 0.1445 0.0740 0.0264 0.0010 Miragrid 8XT Miragrid 5XT Miragrid 5XT Miragrid 5XT v..-'r uuica.53ir2rr�a:.:s�uv cam., Jupiter II Copyright 01998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. ._..,,,. .t.+.Ru Stwooic a�aa0a :Nxw: x _ ..... sr.4.alc tV',WA A Page 5 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 ....14.,r.,n.rrra.wr..alrwf.fom0•bM,..a aP.,M1.f$oleo rv.....Jr..Z.Vawla.V..w.esxuav«-u.w.....r.N+.><.-r.Har+!.tw...r,n.mxr-r®.>ruax 4,....rr,.vx.w.1.m.x.ss. 1rrmx�....)4»n.a..taMrry sro�b9#�P..o.1i MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Date/Time: Toe Mar 10 08:47:27 2015 C;1t110.4 h Solutions \0312,10 UB110 Foot.BEN _«r._} rrv....:...ittriF`..,sItttrO::ettzt.rifS.rentsi+.P.'.Ks!.Ptetttt.c „J.Vfl...Y;...z,7rA V,«.7 tttItt ..sAtrtAMa,•r% ,$&trottitt?tst#W^Jr.1/1t: ^':_P.,..:.1'a'. �..r•I2!;1 .;M+.3 1:.._+.:;fi»RM'.:...x.,.J3..r Ye„+9k. K>Mestri! !r2ks'!tt5t1ttrit. — Earth Solutions NWuc FARTII SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Geotechnicat Engineering, Environmental Services, Construction Monitoring AASHTO 2002 ASD DESIGN METHOD Jupiter II MSEW(3.0): Update # 14.94 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Title: Jupiter II Project Number: ES-0312.10 Client: Digital Fortress Designer: HTW Station Number: Description: 10 Foot UltraBlock Wall without Backslope Company's information: Name: Earth Solutions NW, LLC Street: 1805 136th PI NE, Ste 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone #: (425) 284-3300 Fax #: E-Mail: Original file path and name: C:\Users\henry.wright\Documents\Earth Solutions\0312.10 12.10 UB\10 Foot.BEN Original date and time of creating this file: Thu Mar 05 10:02:00 2015 PROGRAM MODE: ANALYSIS of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE using GEOGRID as reinforcing material. nwl 1...1* 7ffx.'a.n.xi+lvwrrwlllpsrYiixtinlltx4'i'ai.11VY ar+si Nua Jupiter II Copyright ® 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. x-fwwH Page 1 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 AIM Wkw. xw.v }m+.r}t,.4<'.virw>Y.+p1.� 1YRn}{.aYv�im..t♦WA\swte, 1. t{.+'Ax•q'.,—}r AY}ww..rt rtx...,. 731”0.. • 0113,s Vold. MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Date/rime: Tut Mar 10 08:47:27 2015 SOIL DATA REINFORCED SOIL Unit weight, y Design value of internal angle of friction, RETAINED SOIL Unit weight, y Design value of internal angle of friction, 4, 4 125.0 lb/ft 3 32.0 ° 120.0 lb/ft 3 32.0 ° FOUNDATION SOIL (Considered as an equivalent uniform soil) Equivalent unit weight, y e°uiv 120.0 lb/ft 3 Equivalent internal angle of friction, 4:0wuiv 32.0 ° Equivalent cohesion, c equiv 100.0 lb/ft 2 Water table does not affect bearing capacity LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS C:1Userslh ry wright\Documents\Earth Solutions \0312. 10 U11110 Foot,REN Ka (intemal stability) = 0.3073 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 15. Otherwise, eq. 38 is utilized) Inclination of internal slip plane, tj= 61.00° (see Fig. 28 in DEMO 82). Ka (external stability) = 0.3073 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 16. Otherwise, eq. 17 is utilized) BEARING CAPACITY Bearing capacity coefficients (calculated by MSEW): Nc = 35.49 SEISMICITY N y= 30.21 Maximum ground acceleration coefficient, A = 0.229 Design acceleration coefficient in Internal Stability: Kh = Am = 0.280 Design acceleration coefficient in External Stability: Kh_d = 0.118 => Kh = Am = 0.157 (Kh in External Stability is based on allowable displacement, d = 25 mm. using AASHTO 2002 equation) Kae (Kh > 0) = 0.3702 Kae (Kh = 0) = 0.2705 O Kae = 0.0997 Seismic soil-geogrid friction coefficient, F* is 100.0% of its specified static value. 00,0 Jupiter II Copyright 0 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. w.,uw03114, i vtstna.saw.sssuss<.srt.1.0 1.01.rssi ..0 zr s tti ilUs,.wtw4a' a,rwstsaL Page 2 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 �.utct.�cui�Yi�x««,.sAut��W<. !e'.iat....-SY*.fFs.tiv..t.Ntaiw't,wr-9Yk!�iti}a.mwlaugM}'MAIw}Y trw.tl.w9 v.-t..v s.M�.x n.w.la ,tv. WYewalt.cMYa.n.l+l.IA x. ...-!>.Wa MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Prosent rate/rime: Tue Mar 10 08:47:27 2015 INPUT DATA: Geogrids (Analysis) v...ta ta! r.nt➢ u,.lAfiSa Se,...3M.'frw..xiH,gta sYuaiatiy4 ?+'+Rfa Jupiter 11 i::lt3ser ttemy.wrightlllocument0Earth Solutions,0312 10 UB\I0 Foo[.BEN ,t u,ra .:::."'. zsA d 1 lf4b€>•Y 9&N.Mh`}4x. "jw;..x._N„!Jgw2t...�..,._ DATA Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid tvne #1 type #2 tvpe #3 type #4 type #5 Tult [lb/ftl 4700.0 5900.0 7400.0 Durability reduction factor, RFd 1.10 1.10 1.10 Installation -damage reduction factor, RFid 1.10 1.10 1.10 Creep reduction factor, RFc 1.58 1.58 1.58 N/A N/A Fs -overall for strength N/A N/A N/A Coverage ratio, Rc 1.000 1.000 1.000 Friction angle along geogrid-soil interface, Pullout resistance factor, F* Scale -effect correction factor, a p 24.00 24.00 24.00 0.80•tanj 0.80•tanp 0.80•tanp N/A N/A 0.8 0.8 0.8 Variation of Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient With Depth 7 K/Ka Oft 3.3 ft 6.6 ft 9.8 ft 13.1 ft 16.4 ft 19.7 ft 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 K/Ka 1.0 2.0 3.0 ....,,auft 3+rw,e+:.al.Ez v..w,. ..x....,.lt,td.._,lu,iw.m..:. µxi+;-..._;.0 Wv-...> k v«.�.l lw ,...:r.. t.Nss ear. ,.a',•.�,.wifrv.•.w.,: w> �"iaw :..m,..N,w �..e,. WV. c.A,v.VON :WIN.a,.H,.. Vane.. Jupiter II Copyright 01998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. ��a�wc>�u➢wasar,��estsrwuanrx�w,aft+uea.aw�awr><� uoawurssc�am wumx _ � Alwwrxv,Aar.,ala+aA.a�,As�4zza�at�ssrzasa,.xwrs;F�:�;:..�lr.waw,a.w�*��sw..,• Page 3 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 Ynw tt irttt, srt. WWI, '.'w .titti..i lrr*" Wt.A,...rYirrzixsm.t.t1t4 . )t lfu'a`1.'..r..M."1,mo,t?va-lft,tett IP1ffl. i:.*.* 4n3.14ilww. vt-vp.w sw .a-.tx 4'1r..0/1PMVow,/ 3 utk x`rrort.kat., MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Date Time: Tue Mar 10 08:47:27 2015 C\Users\henry wright\Documents\Earth Solutions\0312,10 UB\I0 Foot BEN !t1 ' .. ....? .tIttt°i._..._,1-411:. Ye42 . rw xL,...tItttt e..:.o ttt... •jflt _Nolte E__:"r•lt .. `t'tfR, r¢c ..._ lt.:...- Sttlt.t. .+i,.t'i.:... V9s lyt,,.. .w. ':_t tr.—Ittr. 9._A'i mil_..., ...+?:.tt±tt_. N+YYr»..... T ... , €?.«...„- INPUT DATA: Geometry and Surcharge loads (of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE) Design height, Hd 10.00 [ft] Batter, co 5.7 [deg] Backslope, (3 0.0 [deg] Backslope rise 0.0 [ft] { Embedded depth is E = 1.00 ft, and height above top of finished bottom grade is H = 9.00 ft } Broken back equivalent angle, 1 = 0.00° (see Fig. 25 in DEMO 82) UNIFORM SURCHARGE Uniformly distributed dead load is 250.0 [lb/ft 2] ANALYZED REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT: SCALE: 0 2 4 6 [ft] tt Iai+R. itia::i..na><........wlar.a..rt Jupiter II Copyright 0 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. s«wsae.�w•.at.,..,a,�ra attttr5tw.r�-^��- ,�u..-•..•.�+t�.a+�sru.r.0 is Page 4 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 fJNW)6i7AvP.YYk4)Ike:.%/NY.'%#AMl+kl5.wa3lm........ • ..,. MG/ VTe,.»,a ,.vae,, 1./,..•eV. 9 0474,eflie•...~.,.�,.u.., .>��x, > o... »u.,, ,/4 • •, .�. ,>, ,r ,, ,,.. »41,, ..,> �,_, >,Aa.,.�,.��, 1.>11x1x .5,1114 MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter 11 Present Date/Time: Toe Mar ID 08:47:27 2015 CAUsers\henry wriehf Dacu;rentslEarth Solutions\0312 10 U11110 Foot BEN r...., /v V....,.uv Tee. .../ Ten. /, u...,>flare. EMine /5/ .._...., uusw _.g..n. ee0..} ,..iu vaT,..,,)!w"!. rx*a9 'rr !aY'i",,,,,.Y ',w+k)rA •,,L ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Static conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 7.70, Meyerhof stress = 1753 lb/ft2. Foundation interface: Direct sliding, Fs = 2.303, Eccentricity, e1L= 0.1078, Fs -overturning= 3.65 GEOGRID # Elevation Length Type [ft] [ft] # CONNECTION Fs -overall Fs -overall [connection [geogrid strength] strength] Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentricity strength resistance sliding e/L Fs Fs Fs Product name 1 2.50 7.00 1 2 5.00 7.00 1 3 7.50 7.00 1 1.79 2.65 1.59 1.69 3.66 4.40 1.686 3.658 4.405 3.818 4.920 2.895 2.146 3.079 5.559 0.0556 Miragrid 5XT 0.0196 Miragrid 5XT -0.0003 Miragrid 5XT ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Seismic conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 4.94, Meyerhof stress = 2272 lb/ft2. Foundation Interface: Direct slidintt, Fs = 1.586. Eccentricity, e/L = 0.1974, Fs -overturning = 2.27 GEOGRID # Elevation Length Type [ft] [ft] # CONNECTION Fs -overall Fs -overall Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentricity [connection [geogrid strength resistance sliding e/L strength] strength] l Fs Fs Fs Product name 1 2.50 7.00 1 2 5.00 7.00 1 3 7.50 7.00 1 ta.'-'iiA�w..�rxs3yiCkw.:ai>vX+.\..r,./> 1.26 1.82 1.19 1.48 2.93 3.59 1.476 2.928 3.587 3.117 3.530 2.128 1.520 2.282 4.482 0.1024 0.0381 0.0032 M>v.wE>M,E., Miragrid 5XT Miragrid 5XT Miragrid 5XT Jupiter I1 Copyright 0 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. Page 5 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 ....,iw,vx...tiuwvrr..,•w..--....xsm�'m..,ta..«.«aavar ..wraw,rwe..s v,..,x,vs .v urr.rw..xs wmv v„.,.» MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Date/Time: Tue Mar 10 08:47:41 2015 ^-w?!!wYr. att.4"'! ?..�5:".,.»o!"'t9 wr.: L....:2?. k - >'!L.; .15'-!rt>}nl?:-Yrw..nl, k!1'•_Y;e-W!F.NAS'!wr";:Al.S'S�r. �.:: 1s12Pm!:,Ite-* P......'..+rT _k Earth Solutions NW11c C:\Users\henry.wrighADocumems\Earth Solutions\0312 10 UM7,5 Foot,PEN ... .�_ ..,.r.:s`.f!..ifi.'^Cd.'a1'c',ram'1t14S�:+a.•.Tt!kk'S3C�..sA`.!M.Sr^'.dS,._.. EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental Services, Construction Monitoring AASHTO 2002 ASD DESIGN METHOD Jupiter II MSEW(3.0): Update # 14.94 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Title: Jupiter II Project Number: ES-0312.10 Client: Digital Fortress Designer: HTW Station Number: Description: 7.5 Foot UltraBlock Wall without Backslope Company's information: Name: Earth Solutions NW, LLC Street: 1805 136th PI NE, Ste 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone #: (425) 284-3300 Fax #: E-Mail: Original file path and name: C:\Users\henry.wright\Documents\Earth Solutions\0312.10 2.10 UB\7.5 Foot.BEN Original date and time of creating this file: Thu Mar 05 10:02:00 2015 PROGRAM MODE: +'Yrw.NYm'Yw�tl,anr.xY.K1i M0/0..• IW riY14r»icaVV.w.. 'WW'hanw Nuw+v "Wu,W.x.'wwla Jupiter II Copyright 0 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. ANALYSIS of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE using GEOGRID as reinforcing material. s. rr wse-x.y.1r uaae.,s. f loom iirrw.}' Page 1 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 it MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Daterrime: Tue Mar 10 08:47:42 2015 C:tUse s\henry.wrightlDocuments\Earth Solutionsl0312.10 U1317.5 Foot.BEN 5r44.3.10... .,ke .0c.Ti.e. .o,ltnsu rre'f;r.. Y «u x ..c..!E ,fr:a,I'!. "5,._ N4,V..sxreot:?.a,.:1f.�...,... SOIL DATA REINFORCED SOIL Unit weight, y Design value of internal angle of friction, RETAINED SOIL Unit weight, y Design value of internal angle of friction, FOUNDATION SOIL (Considered as Equivalent unit weight, y «D ;,.. Equivalent internal angle of friction, 4e Equivalent cohesion, c equiv, 4) 4) 125.0 lb/ft' 32.0 ° 120.0 Ib/ft 32.0 ° an equivalent uniform soil) 120.0 lb/ft' quiv, 32.0 ° 100.0 Ib/ft 2 Water table does not affect bearing capacity LATERAL. EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS Ka (internal stability) = 0.3073 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 15. Otherwise, eq. 38 is utilized) Inclination of internal slip plane, yr= 61.00° (see Fig. 28 in DEMO 82). Ka (external stability) = 0.3073 (if batter is less than 10°, Ka is calculated from eq. 16. Otherwise, eq. 17 is utilized) BEARING CAPACITY Bearing capacity coefficients (calculated by MSEW): Nc = 35.49 SEISMICITY N y= 30.2] Maximum ground acceleration coefficient, A = 0.229 Design acceleration coefficient in Internal Stability: Kh = Am = 0.280 Design acceleration coefficient in External Stability: Kh_d = 0.118 => Kh = Am = 0.1.57 (Kh in External Stability is based on allowable displacement, d = 25 mm. using AASHTO 2002 equation) Kae(Kh>0)=0.3702 Kae(Kh=0)=0.2705 A Kae=0.0997 Seismic soil-geogrid friction coefficient, F* is 100.0% of its specified static value. Jupiter II Copyright 0 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. Page 2 of 5 License number MLNL-30I 109 f4 MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II PresenI Datdlimc: Tee Mar 10 08:47:42 2015 Ye„n.,i.wxv ,w,,.,..,.,vw )..... YT,!m/ uae rr+..uuu. .. ...Ysv^ u«,y_..,x �,.vu• ..... �... e+Me Y. .r?M°!,L.!N ;?, _a..�>,«. INPUT DATA: Geogrids (Analysis) C:\Usersthenry.wright\DocumentslEarth Solutions\0312.10 UB17,5 Foot. BEN DATA Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid Geogrid type # 1 type #2 type #3 type #4 type #5 Tult (lb/ftl 4700.0 5900.0 7400.0 Durability reduction factor, RFd 1.10 1.10 1.10 Installation -damage reduction factor, RFid 1.10 1.10 1.10 Creep reduction factor, RFc 1.58 1.58 1.58 N/A N/A Fs -overall for strength N/A N/A N/A Coverage ratio, Rc 1.000 1.000 1.000 Friction angle along geogrid-soil interface, p 24.00 24.00 24.00 Pullout resistance factor, F* 0.80-tar4 0.80-tan') 0.80'tanb N/A N/A Scale -effect correction factor, a 0.8 0.8 0.8 Variation of Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient With Depth Z K/Ka Oft 3.3 ft 6.6 ft 9.8 ft 13.1 ft 16.4 ft 19.7 ft 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.8 16.4 26.2 32.8 K/Ka 1.0 2.0 3.0 Jupiter 11 Copyright ® 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. Page 3 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 atwwiA:NSdd'+wsSW4Y�.''hAllhi%:SOw�.%Y#PktY,Mi4YY.•.,...» MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Present Date/Time: Tun Mar 10 08:47:42 2015 Jupiter II CAUsers\henry.wright\DocumentslEarth Solutions 0312:10 U73\7,5 Foot13EN INPUT DATA: Geometry and Surcharge loads (of a SIMPLE STRUCTURE) Design height, Hd Batter, w Backslope, 13 Backslope rise 7.50 [ft] { Embedded depth is E = 1.00 ft, and height above top of finished bottom grade is H = 6.50 ft } 5.7 [deg] 0.0 [deg] 0.0 [ft] Broken back equivalent angle, I = 0.00° (see Fig. 25 in DEMO 82) UNIFORM SURCHARGE Uniformly distributed dead load is 250.0 [lb/ft 2] ANALYZED REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT: SCALE: 0 2 4 6 [ft] 'i.�v.�.aYNYrvww,bMYn�...-xPKd'.eYw-+rxIrH4'KT+n.tissv VaewxfW.v<xwr�M�.9M, Jupiter II Copyright © 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. Page 4 of 5 License number MLNL-301109 iiWAK5�5wlA�*go- ;+uiy.r.' 4...—ww: rp .4" ar 441 r,.,....».rr1.nw1**..w.11.Y,.....r..y..,.,..nr..+....,r..*fl..,.+1FN......-°'1." k,®.,.rw>........uw # Elevation Length Type MSEW -- Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Jupiter II Present Datefrime: Tuc Mar 10 08:47142 2015 C:\Userslhenry.wright\Documentaarth Solutions10312 10 UBl7 5 Foot,BEN ..tte,m4?r_wp�;r„,7.K't .. , t.. >C.,.k +f;.S **'r..,it ,R .k...........: . . hP.Mr:q. .+rnra. .F> .,,-.,.'. .., rrx2;.... K+, 7..; ,,._ _ .. ,'rag Tt� r• 'K�.*.., .,x� a i.t.._ af7t[f_7:.wrt N, i r � ..:•,.. ^'«.>y.,.-_.. ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Static conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 9.57, Meyerhof stress = 1318 lb/ft2. Foundation Interface: Direct sliding, Fs = 2.552. Eccentricity, e/L = 0.0834, Fs -overturning = 4.46 GEOGRID CONNECTION Fs -overall Fs -overall Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentricity ! Product [connection [geogrid strength resistance sliding e/L name [ft] [ftJ # strength] strength] Fs Fs Fs 1 2.50 6.00 1 2 5.00 6.00 1 1.62 2.24 2.239 3.099 2.618 0.0316 Miragrid 5XT 1.59 4.40 4.405 3.004 4.744 0.0022 Miragrid 5XT ANALYSIS: CALCULATED FACTORS (Seismic conditions) Bearing capacity, Fs = 7.19, Meyerhof stress = 1559 lb/ft2. Foundation interface:. Direct sliding. Fs = 1.807, Eccentricity, e!L = 0.1479. Fs -overturning = 2.91 GEOGRID 3 CONNECTION Fs -overall Fs -overall Geogrid Pullout Direct Eccentricity I Product Elevation Length Type [connection fgeogrid strength resistance sliding e/L 1 name [ft] [ft] # strength] strength] Fs Fs Fs i 1 2.50 6.00 1 2 5.00 6.00 1 1.18 1.95 1.954 2.519 1.941 0.0570 Miragrid 5XT 1.19 3.61 3.611 2.230 3.825 0.0070 Miragrid 5XT ..._,. ,....*,/**.........,.V........ w.,>.,.....«...,. .»..,... 11,***.,. Jupiter II Page 5 of 5 Copyright © 1998-2014 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. License number MLNL-301109 s�w�.,++af«anuasarazac�azuw��a� says.uwe.:.ca..auaxxaew:�.:sw�w!wcx�.�+asa'a�*cassraucaa,:c�..�:.a:.�.�..usa+,rtraw.az.�cs�akr�aawswc...ra�snw.asas�ar�ucu+�5«.�,, '" �y� wa awmy,awwe..waam, . SIUBSITITAlg w s.a.aM.an.aw..a.sc. PLALMVASSISILYCE • Mar Am w memaw Gwn.: a.mw: nunews Om B. e... r..ae.ra.aw aM. .o.a�ay:� . pYs oewwe. VORA.MD MUM.. ww�na.Mrro..w. eMe.awwm.. • wa. MMe �e�_�aa LA* w:,M aa� ��wa �Ma.ea EMMSISIONS KOCK laTIMM WALL gm. A Mt ewacw..km.Mro ewa..a.•w na..roa...e.+, .C. Mn uM., a em a.a+ �a w...a .w••+w. u. aww..gmss ue. .. raaae.wa.a.aem. nwr...M MM. smos. Arm. •z o+m.an .D.waIM • e• In.., a.w�aw..w wawa.. wa..a.f eimv..w. nmwM..e A MOLEVELS.o e e.mum. M.2Ma.ww.n en .ed ALT COMSMISICIPM Vallwwwn•I..tl e•....ns Ma�a..K. e Wayrs. an..P.+. MOM MAIMS 0.11,01. el Me aMMiau==17 DA.A0E MIA Sysim 0.d MY. Ma con. alb y L yper .w .w w ,M ..M_.., parbd ben ye Aft. y w '.'"" aes :.�:.""..ma w USW or Sams mrasnee C. Me.m eMw.. a. �Mu :.`.... r::'ermmCww.a Yorknurn HImaMs....�:M,nn+a�w . Uln Lha' pier .a.."Mt...i. s+.u. A Ma .aan.� ISMANSDED r.e_ • �-� r yam, ULTRA BLOCK UNIT DETAIL GEOGRID SCHEDULE a®�eeeeesess 0�0000aassss ©®MIM0000asssv oZEIMENI000000vov Popia Sims. UM 111 1 Es Sin ULTRA BLOCK MSE WALL - CONDITION 1 eto I - ULTRA BLOCK MSE WALL - CONDITION 2 WI 5ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 10.0' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 7.5' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 12.5' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 15' ULTRA BLOCK GRAVITY WALL A W2 December 1, 2014 Earth Solutions NW LLC ES-0312.09 Digital Fortress 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard, Suite 410 Seattle, Washington 98168 Attention: Mr. Kevin Teker Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Jupiter II Antenna Structure 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard Tukwila, Washington REC F VI D Reference: Sabey Architecture Hughes Technology Systems Jupiter II 8.1 Meter Antenna • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences LEV 5O Hughes Network Systems, LLC Exterior Sitework Installation Information for the Jupiter II Gateway August 28, 2014 City of Tukwila GIS Geologic Map of Tukwila December 2006 Dear Mr. Teker: As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this report and geotechnical evaluation with recommendations for the proposed antenna structure. The approximate project location is illustrated on the attached Vicinity Map (Plate 1). Project Description Based on the referenced plan sheet, an antenna structure pad will be constructed along the west edge of the existing parking lot located west of the south end of the building at 12101 Tukwila International Boulevard. The Boring Location Plan (Plate 2) illustrates the approximate proposed location of the antenna structure pad relative to the existing building, parking lot, and slope. We anticipate grading activities will include cuts into the existing slope to establish the planned antenna structure pad alignment. Based on the referenced plan sheet, we estimate the cut to establish the antenna structure pad alignment will be up to approximately 10 feet. We understand a modular block retaining wall will be constructed to support the cut into the adjacent slope. '1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-47(.14 • FAX (425) 449-4711 Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 ES-0312.09 Page 2 We understand the maximum vertical Toad from the antenna structure will be 3 kips. If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to verify the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report have been incorporated into the plans. Subsurface Conditions As part of the subsurface exploration, two borings were advanced within the proposed antenna structure pad location for purposes of assessing soil and groundwater conditions. The borings were advanced to a depth of 21.5 feet below existing grade. Please refer to the boring logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Soil conditions observed at the boring locations consisted of medium dense to dense silt (Unified Soil Classification ML) deposits to the maximum explored depth of 21.5 feet below existing grades. Geologic Setting The referenced geologic map indicates the project location is underlain by glacial till deposits. The silt soil deposits observed at the boring locations is generally more consistent with pre - Fraser fine-grained deposits. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was not observed during our fieldwork on November 3, 2014. However, localized zones of groundwater seepage should be expected in the cuts for the proposed antenna pad. Site Preparation and Earthwork Based on the referenced project plan, we understand grading for the project will involve a cut into the existing slope of up to 10 feet to establish the proposed antenna structure pad alignment. We understand a modular block retaining wall will be construcled to support the cut into the existing slope. Temporary Erosion Control Straw wattles placed within the downslope side of the existing storm drain culvert should be considered to minimize sediment entering the existing storm drainage system during the proposed grading activities. Erosion control measures should conform to the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) and City of Tukwila standards. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 Structural Fill ES-0312.09 Page 3 We anticipate structural fill may be placed in foundation, retaining wall backfill, utility trench backfill, and parking lot areas for the proposed project. Soils placed in structural areas should be placed in loose lifts of 12 inches or less and compacted to a relative compaction of 95 percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D-1557). Modular Block Retaining Wall We understand a modular block retaining wall will be constructed to support the proposed cut into the existing slope. In our opinion, an Ultra Block gravity wall would be a suitable retaining wall system to support the proposed cut. A modular block wall design and design calculations are provided as attachments to this letter. In our opinion, the proposed temporary cut for the modular block wall can be sloped at an inclination of 0.5H:1V. ESNW should observe the temporary cut to confirm soil conditions and stability. Foundations Based on the results of our study, the proposed antenna structure can be supported on a structural mat foundation bearing on 12 inches of one and one -quarter inch clean crushed rock underlain by competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or structural fill. Competent soils suitable for support of the antenna structure pad should be encountered at a depth of approximately one and one-half to three below existing grades at the proposed pad location. Where loose, organic or other unsuitable materials are encountered at or below the foundation subgrade elevation, the material should be removed and replaced with structural fill or crushed rock, as necessary. Provided the antenna structure will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be used for design of the structural mat foundation: • Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf • Passive earth pressure 300 pcf (equivalent fluid) • Coefficient of friction 0.40 • Modulus of subgrade reaction 300 pci A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 Seismic Considerations ES-0312.09 Page 4 The 2012 IBC recognizes ASCE for seismic site class definitions. If the project will be permitted under the 2012 IBC, in accordance with Table 20.3-1 of ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Site Class D, should be used for design. Utility Trench Support and Backfill In our opinion, the native silt soils observed at the boring locations are generally suitable for support of utilities. In general, the native silt soils observed at the boring locations should be suitable for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, provided the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Due to the high fines content of the native silt soils, we do not recommend using the native silt soils as structure fill during wet weather conditions. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable requirements of the City of Tukwila. Limitations The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the boring locations may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Digital Fortress December 1, 2014 ES-0312.09 Page 5 We trust this report meets your current needs. Should you have questions, or if additional information is required, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Henry T. Wright, E.I.T. Staff Engineer Raymond A. Coglas, RE Principal Attachments: Vicinity Map — Plate 1 Boring Location Plan — Plate 2 Boring Logs Grain Size Distribution Modular Block Wall Design and Notes — Sheet W1 Modular Block Wall Calculations Earth Solutions NW, LLC Reference: King County, Washington Map 625 By The Thomas Guide Rand McNally 32nd Edition NORTH NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. veering;°°Construction Monitoring onmentat Sciences Vicinity Map Jupiter II Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 11/20/2014 Proj. No. 0312.09 Checked HTW Date Nov. 2014 Plate 1 Existing Building LEGEND —.—Approximate Location of B-1 I ESNW Boring, Proj. No. ES-0312.09, Nov. 2014 Proposed Structure Existing Building • \‘‘, • vs Proposed Antenna NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and / or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Property Line Proposed, Block Wall', • , NORTH QW; Not - To - Scale olutions NWu_c I•Engineering, Construction Monitoring and Environmental Sciences Boring Location Plan Jupiter II Tukwila, Washington Drwn. GLS Date 11/20/2014 :Prof. No. 0312.09 Checked HTW Date Nov. 2014 .Plate 2 Earth Solutions NWLLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS MOOp THAN COARSE % FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE 'ea CLEAN GRAVELS���� (LITTLE OR NO FINES) in.=i iWELL-GRADED o' llk .• ;t GW GRAVELS. GRAVEL - SSAND INES MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO 9-Ci ) o '°° oc a 0(4, 0 aO D000 GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL- SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) a C Q o '' c U GM SILTY GRAVELS. GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURES GC CLAYEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES SAND AND SANDY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SW WELL -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) _ SI�I SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES >) f "• SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50%. OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS LESSTHAN 50 mt. INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY. GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS -7.— OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS GREATER THAN 50 MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY. ORGANIC SILTS A tARAMARAR .� u, HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS LI 6 Vs ''' 12: = .t1., dL, _ li Fr PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached bgs. Earth Solutions NW BORING NUMBER B-1 Earth 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 2 ISO! Bellevue, Washington 98005 ilt°. Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Digital Fortress PROJECT NAME II , _Jupiter PROJECT NUMBER 0312.09 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila Washington DATE STARTED 11/3/14 COMPLETED 11/3/14 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Boretec GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD HSA AT TIME OF DRILLING --- LOGGED BY HTW CHECKED BY HTW AT END OF DRILLING — NOTES Grass AFTER DRILLING — o DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) TESTS vi LLii i GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ^ ...X 5 ML Tan SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist -becomes dense -becomes gray -2" layer of sand SS 100 1 �5i-29 MC = 25.10% 12-18-21 (39) 12-170)23 MC = 26.60% Fines = 99.40% _ _XSS 10 SS 100 100 MC = 24.50% i 15 SS 100 8 i28) 7 MC = 24.20% , I - J 20 SS 100 8-13-19 (32) MC = 31.50% Fines = 97.40% (Continued Next Page) US,GDT 11125/14 CLIENT PROJECT Earth Solutions NW BORING NUMBER B-1 Earth 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 'ISOnitIOn Bellevue, Washington 98005 PAGE 2 OF 2 Will; Telephone: 425- 49-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 Digital Fortress PROJECT NAME Jupiter II NUMBER 0312.09 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington n) DEPTH o (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) TESTS vi v. i GRAPHIC LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION , SS 100 9-25-29 (54)2to MC = 5.80% ML SP Tan SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist (continued) 21.5 Gray poorly graded SAND, dense, damp Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring balled with bentonite. Bottom of hole at 21.5 feet. Earth Solutions NW BORING NUMBER B-2 Earth 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 1 OF 2 'SOIL1tiOfl Bellevue, Washington 98005 NWIJe Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Digital Fortress PROJECT NAME Jupiter II PROJECT NUMBER 0312.09 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington DATE STARTED 11/3/14 COMPLETED 11/3/14 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE DRILLING CONTRACTOR Boretec GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD HSA AT TIME OF DRILUNG -- LOGGED BY HTW CHECKED BY HTW AT END OF DRILUNG -- NOTES 3" Asphalt AFTER DRILLING — o DEPTH (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) TESTS co v. n GRAPHIC I LOG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - -VI ML (3" Crushed Rock) Tan SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist -becomes gray -oxide staining -becomes tan -becomes gray 20.0 SS 1 m 100 8-15 22 (37) MC = 26.50% Fines = 98.80% W 5 SS 100 7-1-1 MC = 26.90% SS 100 9 (39) 3 MC = 28.30% MC = 25.10% 15 __ i I _ 1 J 20 SS 100 10-40-26 SS 100 7-13-16 (29) ...__..._ _.. MC = 30.80% (Continued Next Page) GENERAL BH fTP? WELL 0312.9 GPJ LINT US.GDT 11/25/14 'Solution CLIENT PROJECT Earth Solutions NW BORING NUMBER B-2 E.1rth 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 PAGE 2 OF 2 Bellevue, Washington 98005 N1Nrlc. Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 Digital Fortress PROJECT NAME Jupiter II NUMBER 0312.09 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila, Washington IN) DEPTH a (ft) SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER RECOVERY % BLOW COUNTS (N VALUE) TESTS U.S.C.S. GRAPHIC LOG D r v m n z --I 0 z _(; ? }' SS 100 16-20-28 MC = 26.60% ML Gray SILT, medium dense to dense, damp to moist 21.5 Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring backfhled with bentonite. Bottom of hole at 21.5 feet. rtti ; Earth Solutions NW GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION., • luik► * 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 'al i Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: 425-284-3300 CLIENT DigitaLFortress PROJECT NAME Juniper II PROJECT NUMBER ES-312.09 PROJECT LOCATION Tukwila U.S: SIEVE OPENING IN NCHES I 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/23/8 3 4 6 8 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 1416 20 30 1 HYDROMETER 50 60 1 0 140 200 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 1 65 I— �_ 60 >- 55 m ix z 50, u I— 45 z w P 40 w a 35 30 25 20 15 10 -- —. 5 0 100 10 1 0 1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT COBBLES coarse fine coarse [ medium fine OR CLAY Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu O B-1 5.0ft. Gray SILT, ML X B-1 15.0.ft. Gray SILT, ML 6 B-2 2.5ft. Tan SILT, ML Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay , O B-1 5.0ft. 2 0.0 0.6 99.4 E B-1 15.0ft. 2 0.0 2.6 97.4 o B-2 2.5ft. 2 0.0 1.2 98.8 • Well • 11100.1.1,6 •LOCK RE... WALL OMITS " Me ...�.e...:n.. ei: n° • ew.."»...11111..1.u.'m ..<. Ms 6 a..Y....o.W1.Wra trnv.M Nveoavovd " " ,.�.'.......m..> a..a.o..coo COORSE P.m 11:Inat ;• — .» II -I I170 • """ 5' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 7.5' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL .Cl VIEW s ENO VIEW MODULAR BLOCK UNIT DETAIL TO 10' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL 12.5' MODULAR BLOCK GRAVITY WALL a 4' A a W1 UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 Project: Jupiter II Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11 /25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS cp coh y Retained Soil: 33 deg 100 psf 120 pcf Foundation Soil: 33 deg 100 psf 120 pcf Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: 12.29 ft Live Load: 0 psf Wall Batter/Tilt: 0.00/ 5.70 deg Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Embedment: 1.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Depth: 0.50 ft Dead Load: 0 psf z Slope Angle: 27.0 deg Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Slope Length: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Slope Toe Offset: 1.0 ft Leveling Pad Width: 8.38 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 2.40 (IvIpd) / 1.51 FoS Overturning: 2.83 / 1.50 Bearing: 2138.97 / 4074.28 FoS Bearing: 9.54 / 5.01 Name Elev. ka r kae Pa Pae Pir l - PaC FSal FoS':OT' - sresFSsi FFS SeisOT 1X 9.78 0.365 10.569 131 204 113 131 100.00 10,00 95,58 4.06 IX 7.34 0.365 ( 0.570 524 818 226 j 524 100.00 10.00 1 34.47 1.60 2X-2X i 4.89 0.614 ( 0.911 2116 3142 453 1188 15.84 9.46 4.12 2.83 7.47 1.75 1.26 W ....w, . 2X-2X ( 2.45 0.511 0.735 3080 4433 679 1433 ._.j. I 4.75 1X-2X-2X 0.00 0.606 0.825 5883 8006 1018 j 1980 2.40[2:621 2.88 1 1.51(1.57J 1.50 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and sho d not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page 1 Project: Jupiter II Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11/25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 33 deg Foundation Soil: 33 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh 100 psf 100 psf 9.83 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 1.00 ft 0.50 ft 27.0 deg 10.0 ft 1.0 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 2.63 (IvIpd) / 1.45 Bearing: 1698.65 / 4584.88 Y 120 pcf 120 pcf Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: • 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 5.92 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: 2.84 / 1.25 10.11 / 3.75 E/ev ka Pa Pa$ } Pir - PaC FSs/ FoS Or siesFSs/ FoS SeisOT IX 7.34 0.365 0.569 131 204 113 131 100.00 10.00 95.66 4.07 1X 4.89 1 0.365 0.570 523 817 226 100.00 10.00 34.49 1.61 2X-2X 2.45 1 0.597 0.886 2058 3056 1 453 1171 15.99 4.15 7.52 1.73 2X-2X 0.00 0.499 0.720 3012 4340 679 1417 2.63(3.01j 2.84 1.45(1.571 1.25 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and should not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page 1 Project: Location: Designer: Date: Section: Design Method: Design Unit: Jupiter II Antenna Pad HTW 11/25/2014 Section 1 AASHTO_2002 Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS cp Retained Soil: 33 deg Foundation Soil: 33 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh y 100 psf 120 pcf 100 psf 120 pcf 7.38 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 1.00 ft 0.50 ft 27.0 deg 10.0 ft 1.0 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 3.12 (Ivlpd) / 1.64 Bearing: 1131.92 / 1970.15 Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 5.92 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: 4.15 / 1.71 15.74 / 9.04 Name Elev. ka kae i Pa Pao Fir - PaC. FSsi FoS_OT siesFSs/ FoS SeisOT 1X 4.89 0.365 0.36E 0.570 0.576 132 206 113 226 132 525 100.00 100.00 3.1243.991 10.00 95.25 4.04 1X 1 2.45 525 820 10.00 ( 4.15 34.44 1.64[1.891 1.60 2X-2X 1 0.00 0.580 0.862 2005 2977 453 1156 1.71 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and should not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page 1 Project: Jupiter II Location: Antenna Pad Designer: HTW Date: 11/25/2014 Section: Section 1 Design Method: AASHTO_2002 Design Unit: Ultrablock Seismic Acc: 0.200 SOIL PARAMETERS tp Retained Soil: 33 deg Foundation Soil: 33 deg Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone GEOMETRY Design Height: Wall Batter/Tilt: Embedment: Leveling Pad Depth: Slope Angle: Slope Length: Slope Toe Offset: UltraWall UltraWall v3.3 Build 14226 coh 100 psf 100 psf 4.92 ft 0.00/ 5.70 deg 1.00 ft 0.50 ft 27.0 deg 10.0 ft 1.0 ft Vertical 6 on Single Depth RESULTS (Static / Seismic) FoS Sliding: 100.00 (fnd) / 2.49 Bearing: 639.36 / 1205.55 v 120 pcf 120 pcf Live Load: 0 psf Live Load Offset: 0.00 ft Live Load Width: 100 ft Dead Load: 0 psf Dead Load Offset: 10.0 ft Dead Load Width: 100 ft Leveling Pad Width: 3.46 ft FoS Overturning: FoS Bearing: 10.00 / 1.60 23.16 / 12.28 Name, Elev. ka kae Pa Pao J Per 1 -PaC I FSs! FoS p7 siesFSs! FoS SeisOT 1X 2.45 0.365 0.570 131 205 . 113 1 131 100.00 10.00 ( 95.33 4.05 1X ; 0.00 0.365 0.570 525 819 , 226 1 525 100.00(100.001 10.00 2.4913.511 1.60 Note: Calculations are for Preliminary use only and should not be used for construction without the review of a qualified professional. UltraWall Page 1 [202] v NOTES: �I► 1. THE SYMBOL INDICATES A CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS REVISION WHERE "X" IS THE REVISION LEVEL 2. REMOVE ALL BURRS AND SHARP EDGES 3. DIMENSIONS APPLY AFTER PLATING 4. PERMANENTLY MARK OR TAG WITH PART# AND REV 0° POINTING DIRECTION 8.0 _t 223.0 [5665] 149.4 [3794] 17.I%r1..�i` am _'t IA,: i hr II! Mop' 4/1 A (FOUNDATION SURFACE) 25.3 [6411 94.6 [2403] R219.8 [5583] 100.8 [2560] (FLOOR) 54.5 [1386] i 78.0 [1981] 1C031 107.0 2718] 143.6 [3648] 1 166.1 [4220] 3.0 [76] 0° POINTING DIRECTION 156.0 [3962] 322.3 [8188] 2.8 [70] MATERIAL REV DESCRIPTION 09SEP14: ADDED ELECTRICAL PANEL INFO 267.7 [6801] 96.5 [2452] 34 .4 [8672] NOTICE: DIMENSIONS AND FEATURES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES INTERPRET PER ASME Y14.5M-1994 1 ©Signar TOLERANCES THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION 1 PIACE .X± 0.125 FINISH 2PIACE .XX± 0.030 3 PLACE .XXX ± 0.005 DRAWN BY T.EXNER 04SEPi4 SIZE CAGE CODE DOCUMENT NO. ANGLES± 0.1° ECU _ D 4ZTA9 www.ascsignal.com 8.1m ESA DIMENSIONAL LAYOUT A ALL SURFACES 63 MASS: - LBS STATUS DATE REVISION SHEET NOTICE These drawings and specificafions are the proprietary property of ASC SIGNAL CORPORATION RELEASED TO PRODUCTION 04SEP14 p lOF3 and may be used any for the specific purpose authorized in writing by ASC SIGNAL. f 6 5 4 2 1 A Ow- 0` POINTING DIRECTION 100° 100° R98.9 [2512] 60.0 El524]) 30.0 [762] ELECTRICAL PANEL 5'w x 6'6"h x 8"d LI 5 -0016 ag©Signal" RECEIVED www.ascsignal.com 8.1m ESA DIMENSIONAL LAYOUT SIZE CAGE CODE DOCUMENT NO. D 4ZTA9 NOTICE: These drawings and specifications are the proprietary property of ASC SIGNAL CORPORATION and may be used only for the specific purpose authorized in writing by ASC SIGNAL. REVISION SHEET g 20F3 2 1 • • 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 0° POINTING DIRECTION 96.9 [2462] 108.8 A [2763] ANTENNA ROTATED 90°CCW (REFLECTOR/SRT NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) 7.1 [180] MIN. TOE CLEARANCE PER CSA-S37-01 5.1 [129] 78.0 [1981] 108.8 [2764] C1 ©Sigono11" ". F.. W ; ; ,z > , . —5 2 ---,1 U > • www.ascsignal.com 8.1m ESA DIMENSIONAL LAYOUT SIZE CAGE CODE DOCUMENT NO. D 4ZTA9 NOTICE These drawings and specifications are the proprietary property of ASC SIGNAL CORPORATION and may be used only for the specific purpose authorized in writing by ASC SIGNAL. 2 1 REVISION SHEET g 30F3 INTRODUCTION, VISION GLOSSARY MAP LEGEND Associated files PLI 5-0013 This File: L15-0017 - REZONE *Included with 2013 archives VOID Associated files PLI 5-0013 This File: L15-0018 VOID