Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL15-0032 - CHRISTINE CONTRERAS - BEACON & BANGOR SCL / TYPE 2 WIRELESS FACILITYWIRELESS FACILITY TYPE 2 Parent Project: PL15-0032 APPROVED This File: L15-0039 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director August 6, 2015 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Christine Contreras 918 South Horton Street Suite #1002 Seattle, WA 98134 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L15-0039; PL15-0032 Applicant: Christine Contreras, Ryka Consulting on behalf of T-Mobile Type of Permit Applied for: Type II Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Permit Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a Type II Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (WCF) Permit to replace antennas on an existing utility pole. Location: Tax Lot NO: 5476800305. This tower is located northwest of the intersection at 51st Ave S and S Bangor St, Tukwila. Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: Low Density Residential (LDR) II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Community Development Department has determined that the application for a Type II Wireless Communications Facility does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application without conditions. Page 1 of 3 08/06/2015 \\tukdata2k12\DCD Common$\Users\Dillon\Wireless Facility\L15-0039\Notice of Decision.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type II decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. No administrative appeal of a DNS or an EIS is permitted. One administrative appeal to the City Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. If an MDNS was issued, any person wishing to challenge either the conditions which were imposed by the MDNS decision or the failure of the Department to impose additional conditions in the MDNS must raise such issues as part of the appeal to the Hearing Examiner. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the Hearing Examiner appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this decision that is by August 20, 2015. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code ch. 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee of $541 plus retainer. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the Hearing Examiner based on the information presented to the Community Development Director, who made the original decision. No new evidence or testimony will be permitted during the appeal hearing. Parties will be allowed to present oral argument based on the information presented to the Community Development Director before their decision was issued. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Page 2 of 3 08/06/2015 Any party wishing to challenge the Hearing Examiner's decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. The City's decision to issue a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS is final for this permit and any other pending permit applications for the development of the subject property. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Dillon Roth, who may be contacted at 206-431-3662 or via email at dillon.roth@tukwilawa.gov for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. 1MAA4t bLA-Gf Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Page 3 of 3 08/06/2015 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR PREPARED August 6, 2015 NOTIFICATION: Notification is not required for this Type 2 permit. FILE NUMBER: L15-0039; PL15-0032 APPLICANT: Christine Contreras, Ryka Consulting on behalf of T-Mobile PROPERTY OWNER: Seattle City Light REQUEST: Approval of a Type II Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (WCF) Permit for the replacement of antennas on an existing utility pole. LOCATION: Northwest of the intersection at 51 st Ave S and S Bangor St, Tukwila (PIN: 5476800305) ASSOCIATED PERMITS: D15-0179 (Building) SEPA DETERMINATION: Exempt COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) ZONE DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) STAFF: Dillon Roth, Planning Intern ATTACHMENTS: Project Plans for Permit L15-0039 Project Narrative for Permit L15-0039 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 FINDINGS Vicinity/Site Information Project Description The applicant is requesting approval of a Type II Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (WCF) Permit to replace antennas on parcel number 5476800305. The project includes the following: • Replace the (3) existing T-Mobile antennas with (3) new COMMSCOPE #SBNHH-1D65C antennas • Replace existing (6) style 4 TMA's w/ (3) new style 3C TMA's and replace existing (6) Diplexers w/ (3) new AWS/700 Twin Diplexers • Keep Existing (6) Style 4 TMA's and (6) Diplexers. The new antennas will extend approximately 2'-6" higher than the existing pole, bringing the total height to 45'. Existing Development The existing antenna and pole reaches a height of 42'-6" and is located on property currently owned by Seattle City Light. The mechanical equipment associated with the T-Mobile antennas are completely screened with a wood fence. The project site is bordered by the Seattle City Light Transmission right of way to the south. Surrounding Land Uses The parcel is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) as is the surrounding area. There is a Regional Commercial Center (RCC) zoning designation approximately 200 feet to the north at the intersection of South 107th Street and 51 st Avenue South. To the east of 5151 Avenue South, across the street from the proposed project, is the southern portion of Seattle and the Rainier Beach neighborhood. This area is zoned Single Family by the City of Seattle. Background In 2006, the City adopted a Wireless Facilities Chapter (TMC 18.71) to the Zoning Code. The chapter provides specific location and design requirements for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. Location Selection Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) provides a hierarchy of appropriate locations within the City. Generally, co -locations and utilizing existing structures are favored over the development of new standalone WCF within the City. TABLE A Type of Permit Required, Based on Type of Wireless Communication Facility ZONING (1) TYPE OF FACILITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Transmission Tower co -location Type 1 Type 1 Type 1 Adding antennas to an existing tower Type 1(2) Type 1(2) Type 1(2) Utility pole co -location Type 2 Type 2 Type 2 Concealed building attached Type 2(3) Type 2(3) Type 2(3) Non -concealed building attached Type 2 Type 2 Type 1 New tower or waiver request Type 4 Type 4 Type 4 (1) Zoning for any private/public property or right-of-way: Residential — LDR, MDR, or HDR; Commercial — 0, MUO, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC, C/LI or TVS; Industrial - LI, HI, MIC/L, or MIC/H (2) Provided the height of the tower does not increase and the square footage of the enclosure area does not increase. (3) An applicant may request to install a non -concealed building attached facility, under TMC Section 18.58.150. Page 2 of 5 08/06/2015 N f N The applicant is proposing to replace antennas on an existing pole. This decision does not require the use of any new facilities for placement of the new antennas. The height of the proposed antennas is approximately two feet taller than the existing pole, which is also taller than the existing antennas, therefore, the project is not exempt per TMC 18.58.030. The proposed modifications are considered a Type 2 decision. Design Standards The City provides specific design standards for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. The table below indicates if the applicant's proposal complies with required standards. Table 1 (See TMC 18.58.070 for further details General Requirements Project does comply Project does not comply Not Applicable Notes 1. Generators or other devices which will create noise must comply with TMC 8.22 regarding noise. X No new generators are proposed 2. Business License Requirement X No new business license is required. 3. Only safety signage must be placed on the WCF. X The applicant does not propose any new signage. 4. Accommodations for parking for maintenance personal must be provided. X Parking is not affected by this modification. 5. Towers shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness. X There is no change proposed to the existing wooden pole. 6. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities to the natural setting and built environment. X No new structures are proposed. 7. Antennas shall have the same color scheme as the structure they are located on. X New antennas will be painted to match existing equipment. 8. WCF poles and towers shall only have safety lights if required by a government agency. X No lighting is proposed. 9. No advertising is permitted on WCF X No advertising is proposed. 10. Each service provider shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet. X The equipment enclosure will not exceed 360 square feet. Page 3 of 5 08/06/2015 Table 2 (See TMC 18.58.120 for additional information Utility Pole Co -location requirements: Project does comply Project does not comply Not Applicable Notes Height — The height of a utility pole co -location is limited to 10 feet above the replaced utility pole, and may be not greater than 50 feet in height in residential zones. X The total height of the proposal is 45'. Replacement pole — The replaced utility pole must be used by the owner of the utility pole to support its utility lines (phone lines or electric). A replaced utility pole cannot be used to provide secondary functions to utility poles in the area. X The utility pole is not being replaced in this proposal. Pole aesthetics — The replaced utility pole must have the color and general appearance of the adjacent utility poles. X The utility pole its not being replaced in this proposal. Coaxial cables — Coax cables limited to '/2" in diameter may be attached directly to a utility pole. Coax cables greater than 'A" must be placed within the utility pole. X The coax cables are located within the pole. Pedestrian impact — The proposal shall not result in a significant change in the pedestrian environment or preclude the City from making pedestrian improvements. X There is no significant change to the pedestrian environment. Cabinet equipment —The cabinet equipment must be screened from view. If the cabinet equipment is to be located on the ground, the equipment must be fenced with a 6-foot-tall fence and materials shall be used to screen the equipment from view. X There is no change to the existing screened cabinet equipment. Setbacks —The City will evaluate setbacks on private property under the setback requirements set forth in TMC Section 18.58.160. X There is no change to the existing setbacks. Setbacks will continue to meet the existing requirements. Page 4 of 5 08/06/2015 CONCLUSIONS 1. As demonstrated in Tables 1 and 2, the project meets all applicable development standards for a Type 2 WCF permit. 2. The proposed modifications will not alter the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building or site design. 3. The proposed project is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendation to the Director of Community Development is to approve this application for a Type II Wireless Telecommunication Facility permit as applied for by Ryka Consulting on behalf of T-Mobile without conditions. Page 5 of 5 08/06/2015 1 1. C,ihi 4 Department Of Community AFFIDAVIT OF J(Avila , Development DISTRIBUTION I, _Dillon Roth , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Was mailed to each of the addresses listed: 'ccontreras@rykaconsulting.com' (applicant) 7Vlargaret.Duncan@Seattle.Gov' (Seattle City Light, Landowner) 'sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov' (WA State Department of Ecology) K.C. Assessor's Office, Accounting Division 500 4th Ave - Rm 709A Seattle, WA 98104 on this _6th day of August , 2015 Project Name: T-Mobile ASE03556D Beacon & Bangor/SCL Project Number: L15-0039 Associated File Number (s): PL15-0032; D15-0179 (Building) Mailing requested by: Dillon Roth Mailer's signature: ; I ),../� (L --- W:\USERS\DILLON\WIRELESS FACILITY\L15-0039\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION_NOD.DOC Dillon Roth From: Dillon Roth Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:46 AM To: 'Christine Contreras' Cc: 'sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov'; 'Margaret.Duncan@Seattle.Gov'; Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: Notice of Decision for WCF permit #L15-0039 Attachments: L15-0039_WCF_Notice of Decision.pdf; L15-0039_Staff Report.pdf Hello, Attached is the Notice of Decision as well as the staff report for a Type II Wireless Telecommunications Facilities permit in Tukwila, WA. The permit has been approved without conditions. Dillon Dillon Roth Planning Intern City of Tukwila Dillon.Roth@tukwilawa.gov (206) 431-3662 The City of opportunity, the community of choice. 1 "i eitII of J u 11wiCa Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Dillon Roth HEREBY DECLARE THAT: X Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Non- Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Was mailed to each of the addresses listed: 'ccontreras@rykaconsulting.com' (applicant) 11fargaret.Duncan@Seattle.Gov' (Seattle City Light, Landowner) on this _21 st day of July , 2015 Project Name: T-Mobile ASE03556D Beacon & Bangor/SCL Project Number: L15-0039 Associated File Number (s): PL15-0032; D15-0179 (Building) Mailing requested by: Dillon Roth Mailer's signature: ` 1 1 /2 -- W:\USERS\DILLON\WIRELESS FACILITY\L15-0039\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC \ 0400 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number L15-0039 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building Planning Public Works I0 Fire Dept. Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: T-Mobile ASE03556D Beacon & Bangor/SCL Address: 10405 51 st Ave South Seattle, WA 98178 Date transmitted: July 21, 2015 Response requested by: August 4, 2015 Staff coordinator: Dillon Roth Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) This application is for a Wireless Telecommunication Facility review. �.�‘,, t) Plan check date: Comments Update date: ��,lS pared 1 0400 TO: City of Tukwila RECEIVE Department of Community Development `JUL) 21 2015 TUKW LA PUBLIC WORKS File Number L15-0039 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building n Planning {i:'1 . ublic Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: T-Mobile ASE03556D Beacon & Bangor/SCL Address: 10405 51 st Ave South Seattle, WA 98178 Date transmitted: July 21, 2015 Response requested by: August 4, 2015 Staff coordinator: Dillon Roth Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) This application is for a Wireless Telecommunication Facility review. (PLc 1:31 o. to GC S HA S "JD C--om v✓i 6 T.5 Plan check date: —7/2-2/1 Comments Update date: 5 prepared by: df11 Christine Contreras From: Minnie Dhaliwal <Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:52 AM To: Jesse London Subject: RE: CeII antenna tower Jesse, The affidavit of ownership is required from the property owner. It is also an authorization for city staff to enter the property. If there is particular language on the form that needs to be amended we can have the city attorney review it. Materials board for screening is referring to samples of the material used for equipment enclosure screening. If your proposal does not include any alteration of the ground mounted equipment enclosure then this does not apply. Type 2 application does not require items listed under Type 2 review. Minnie Made DiaPicved Planning Supervisor 'City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100ITukwila, WA 98188 Ph. 206-431-3685 Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov The City of choice, the community of opportunity From: Jesse London [mailto:JLondon@rykaconsulting.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 8:17 AM To: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: RE: CeII antenna tower Good morning Minnie, My apologies for taking so long to look closely at this, I've been in and out of the office for a few weeks. I should be able to provide the materials that you have referenced here. Both of my projects in the City of Tukwila should meet the requirements set by 6409, as they both only involve the swapping of antennas of similar size. I do have a question about three of the items required: - The affidavit of ownership will be difficult to get and it is a little unusual for this to be a requirement for a project like this, as there is typically lease language that gives the carrier's associates the right to enter the property. Would a copy of the lease suffice? - Does the "materials board for the screening" refer to just a piece of poster board or something like that? If you could clarify what this is, that would be very helpful. - Do minor modifications such as these require all of the public notice materials? It's not under the Type 2 review, but has its own section on the application, so I thought that I should clarify this also. 1 / \ Thanks for all of your help!! Jesse London RYKA-. CONSULTING 206.523.1941 Office 425.327.6833 Cell 206.260.7930 Fax ilondonOrvkaconsulting.com 918 South Horton Street Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 VISIT OUR REVAMPED WEBSITE www.rykaconsulting.com From: Minnie Dhaliwal [mailto:Minnie.DhaliwaI TukwilaWA.gov] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:24 PM To: Jesse London Subject: FW: Cell antenna tower Jesse, Our current code requires Type 2 Wireless Facilities permit for utility pole co -locations, which is an administrative approval. The application for Type 2 Wireless Facilities permit are online at http://www.tukwilawa.gov/dcd/apps/WCFApp.pdf Also, refer to Tukwila Municipal Code 18.58.120 for regulations pertaining to utility pole co -locations. Also, if you think that the proposal qualifies for review under Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act please provide information sufficient to determine whether the proposed change constitutes a substantial change or not. If it is not a substantial change then it could be processed expeditiously as required by the Spectrum Act. A substantial change as established by FCC rules is: Substantial Change. A proposed facilities modification will substantially change the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure if it meets any of the following criteria: a. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, it increases the height of the tower by more than 10% or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet, whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it increases the height of the structure by more than 10% or more than 10 feet, whichever is greater. Changes in height should be measured from the original support structure in cases where deployments are or will be separated horizontally, such as on buildings' rooftops; in other circumstances, changes in height should be measured from the dimensions of the tower or base station, inclusive of originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were approved prior to the passage of the Spectrum Act. b. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than 20 feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than 6 feet. 2 ! / \ c. For any eligible support structure, it involves installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed 4 cabinets; or, for towers in the public rights -of -way and base stations, it involves installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there are no pre-existing ground cabinets associated with the structure, or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than 10% larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the structure. d. For any eligible support structure: (1) it entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site; (2) it would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support structure; or (3) it does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval of the construction or modification of the eligible support structure or base station equipment, provided however that this limitation does not apply to any modification that is noncompliant only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds identified in this section. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Minnie Made 2Vatioeit Planning Supervisor i City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100ITukwila, WA 98188 Ph. 206-431-3685 Minnie.Dhaliwal@TukwilaWA.gov The City of choice, the community of opportunity From: Jesse London[mailto:JLondon@rykaconsulting.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:15 AM To: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: Cell antenna tower Good morning Minnie, A client of mine is looking into replacing some antennas on a cell tower (wood pole). I have attached a draft copy of the plans which includes the address and parcel on the first page, with elevation drawings on the fifth page. As you can see, the antenna count will remain the same but the new antennas will extend above the tip of the pole itself, though the pole itself will not be altered. My colleague tells me that such an increase in overall height might trigger some extra permitting requirements. Could you please confirm if this is indeed the case, in this instance? And if so, what are the extra requirements (perhaps a CUP amendment or something like that)? Thanks for your help. Let me know if you have any questions. Jesse London RYKA. CONSULTING 206.523.1941 Office 425.327.6833 Cell 206.260.7930 Fax ilondonOrvkaconsulting.com 3 l \ 918 South Horton Street Suite 1002, Seattle, WA 98134 VISIT OUR REVAMPED WEBSITE www.rvkaconsulting.com 4 r RYKA)CONSULTING Memo To: City of Tukwila — Planning Department From: Christine Contreras Re: Wireless Telecommunication Facilities-SE03556D (T-MOBILE IL700 MHz) To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed, please find the : ilding Permit packag- for the above mentioned T-MOBILE Wireless site. Please acknowledge receipt of this pac age by signing below and fax (206-260-7930) or emailing to ccontreras@rvkaconsulting.com. Received by City of Tukwila Signature: Date Rec'd: Permit Application # Sincerely, Christine Contreras Ryka Consulting on behalf of T-MOBILE Ryka Consulting 1918 S. Horton St #1002 Seattle, WA 98134 PROJECT NARRATIVE Applicant: T-Mobile c/o Ryka Consulting Submitted to: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Project Name: T-Mobile @ SE03556D Beacon & Bangor/SCL Project Address: 1030 S 140th Street Parcel Number: 5476800305 Property Owner: SEATTLE CITY OF SCL Zone Designation: LDR (Low Density Residential) SEPA Determination: Exempt Application Type: WCF Permit (Type 2) Project: Submittal Package T-Mobile proposes to upgrade an existing wireless communication facility by replacing antennas on an existing tower owned by Seattle City Light. The replacement antennas will extend above the top of the existing pole by approximately two feet. No ground disturbance is proposed. WCF Permit • Application Checklist (1) • Wireless Telecommunication Facility Application (5) • 11" x 17" Construction Drawings (Includes Site Plan, Elevation Views) (5) • Application Fee (1) • Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (5) • Photo Simulations (4) • SEPA (Categorically EXEMPT) • Project Narrative/Code Compliance (1) • NIER (2) • Sensitive Area Studies— The subject site is not located in an area designated as sensitive by the City of Tukwila. (EXEMPT) • Noise Report (exempt — no generator is proposed) Project Description T-Mobile proposes to upgrade an existing wireless communication facility by replacing (3) existing antennas for (3) new antennas on an existing tower owned by Seattle City Tight. The replacement antennas will extend above the top of the existing pole by approximately two feet. No ground disturbance is proposed. Review Process The property is zoned LDR. Per conversations with Planning Department this project is to go through a WCF Permit Process (Type 2). The original T-Mobile facility was first approved under permit number L06-087 in 2007. The proposed modifications will be in conformance with the previous Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, this project will not result in a significant change in the overall visual impact of the existing facility. The overall height of the pole will not exceed 50 feet in height in this residential zone. Design and Development Standards T-Mobile's proposal is in compliance with all applicable design and development standards. According to WCF Section 18.58 as follows: The following are general requirements for all Wireless Communication Facilities: 1. Noise — Any facility that requires a generator or other device which will create noise must demonstrate compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". A noise report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted with any application to construct and operate a wireless communication facility that will have a generator or similar device. The City may require that the report be reviewed by a third party expert at the expense of the applicant. T-MOBILE is not proposing a generator. 2. Business license requirement — Any person, corporation or entity that operates a wireless communication facility within the City shall have a valid business license issued annually by the City. Any person, corporation or other business entity which owns a tower also is required to i obtain a business license on an annual basis. T-Mobile has a City Business License. 3. Signage — Only safety signs or those mandated by other government entities may be located on wireless communication facilities. No other types of signs are permitted on wireless communication facilities. T-Mobile is not proposing any new signage. 4. Parking — Any application must demonstrate that there is sufficient space for temporary parking for regular maintenance of the proposed facility. Parking is not affected by T-MOBILE's proposed modification. 5. Finish — A tower shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or, subject to any applicable standards of the FAA or FCC, be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness. No change to the existing tower color is proposed. 6. Design — The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities with the natural setting and built environment. T-MOBILE is not proposing a new building or structure. 7. Color — All antennas and ancillary facilities located on buildings or structures other than towers shall be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and ancillary facilities as visually unobtrusive as possible. This is an existing wireless facility. No change to the existing tower color is being proposed. 8. Tgghting — Towers shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA, FCC or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the reviewing authority shall review the lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding areas. No strobe lighting of any type is permitted on any tower. i T-MOBILE is not proposing any new lighting. 9. Advertising — No advertising is permitted at wireless communication facility sites or on any ancillary structure or facilities equipment compound. T-MOBILE is not proposing any advertising at this existing wireless facility. 11. Equipment Enclosure — Each applicant shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet at each site. However, this restriction shall not apply to enclosures located within an existing commercial, industrial, residential or institutional building. T-MOBILE is not proposing to exceed more than 360 square feet at this existing wireless facility location. 18.58.130 Tower -Specific Development Standards: 1. Height — Any proposed tower with antennas shall meet the height standards of the zoning district where the tower will be located. This is an existing wireless facility. The height of the tower will not exceed 50 feet in height in this residential zone. 2. Antenna and tower aesthetics — The applicant shall utilize a wireless communication concealed facility. The choice of concealing the wireless communication facility must be consistent with the overall use of the site. For example, having a tower appear like a flagpole would not be consistent if there are no buildings on the site. If a flag or other wind device is attached to the pole, it must be appropriate in scale to the size and diameter of the tower. This is an existing wireless facility. This project will not result in a significant change in visual impact and will not exceed 50 feet in height in this residential zone. 3. Setbacks — The proposed wireless communication facilities must meet the setbacks of the underlying -zoning district. If an exception is granted under TMC Section 18.58..180 with regards to height, the setback of the proposed wireless communication facilities will increase 2 feet for every foot in excess of the maximum permitted height in the zoning district. This is an existing wireless facility. This project will not result in a significant change in visual impact and will not exceed 50 feet in height in this residential zone. 4. Color — The color of the tower shall be based on the surrounding land uses. This is an existing wireless facility. No change to the existing tower color is being proposed. 5. Feed lines and coaxial cables — All feed lines and cables must be located within the tower. Feed lines and cables connecting the tower to the equipment enclosure, which are not located within the wireless communication facility equipment compound, must be located underground. The City prefers the use of concealed building mounted facilities in lieu of non -concealed facilities. However, in some cases using a non -concealed facility may allow a wireless facility to blend with the environment. An applicant may request to use a non -concealed facility and will be evaluated under the following criteria: The coaxial cables are located within the tower. No change. 1. An applicant for a wireless communication facility can demonstrate that placing the facility on certain portions of a property will provide better screening and aesthetic considerations than provided under the existing setback requirements; or 2. The modification will aid in retaining open space and trees on the site; or 3. The proposed location allows for the wireless communication facility to be located a greater distance from residentially -zoned (LDR, MDR, and HDR) properties. This is an existing wireless facility. This project will not result in a significant change in visual impact. The height increase will not exceed 50 feet in height in this residential zone. 18.58.150: Landscaping/Screening. A. The visual impacts of wireless communication facilities may be mitigated and softened through landscaping or other screening materials at the base of the tower, facility equipment compound, equipment enclosures and ancillary structures, with the exception of wireless communication facilities located on transmission towers, or if the antenna is mounted flush on an existing building, or camouflaged as part of the building and other equipment is housed inside an existing structure. The DCD Director, Director of Public Works or Planning Commission, as appropriate, may reduce or waive the standards for those sides of the wireless communication facility that are not in public view, when a combination of existing vegetation, topography, walls, decorative fences or other features achieve the same degree of screening as the required landscaping; in locations where the visual impact of the tower would be minimal; and in those locations where large wooded lots and natural growth around the property perimeter may be sufficient buffer. B. Landscaping shall be installed on the outside of fences. Existing vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent practicable and may be used as a substitute for or as a supplement to landscaping or screening requirements. The following requirements apply: 1. Screening landscaping shall be placed around the perimeter of the equipment cabinet enclosure, except that a maximum 10-foot portion of the fence may remain without landscaping in order to provide access to the enclosure. 2. The landscaping area shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width around the perimeter of the enclosure. 3. The applicant shall utilize evergreens that shall be a minimum of 6 feet tall at the time of planting. 4. Applicant shall utilize irrigation or an approved maintenance schedule that will insure that the plantings are established after two years from the date of planting. C. The applicant shall replace any unhealthy or dead plant materials in conformance with the approved landscaping development proposal, and shall maintain all landscape materials for the life of the facility. In the event that landscaping is not maintained at the required level, the Director, after giving 30 days advance written notice, may maintain or establish the landscaping at the expense of the owner or operator and bill the owner or operator for such costs until such costs are paid in full. This is an existing wireless facility and no change in the existing landscaping is being proposed. T-MOBILE's project will not include the removal of any existing vegetation. 18.58.160 Zoning Setback Exceptions: A. Generally, wireless communication facilities placed on private property must meet setbacks of the underlying zoning. However, in some circumstances, allowing modifications to setbacks may better achieve the goal of this Chapter of concealing such facilities from view. B. The Director or Hearing Examiner, depending on the type of application, may permit modifications to be made to setbacks when: 1. An applicant for a wireless communication facility can demonstrate that placing the facility on certain portions of a property will provide better screening and aesthetic considerations than provided under the existing setback requirements; or 2. The modification will aid in retaining open space and trees on the site; or 3. The proposed location allows for the wireless communication facility to be located a greater distance from residentially -zoned (LDR, MDR, and HDR) properties. i 1 C. This zoning setback modification cannot be used to waive/modify any required setback required under the State Building Code or Fire Code. This is an existing wireless facility and T-MOBILE will continue to meet the setbacks of the underlying zoning. 18.58.170 Height Waivers: Where the Hearing Examiner finds that extraordinary hardships, practical difficulties, or unnecessary and unreasonable expense would result from strict compliance with the height limitations of the Zoning Code, or the purpose of these regulations may be served to a greater extent by an alternative proposal, it may approve a height waiver to these regulations; provided that the applicant demonstrates that the waiver(s) will substantially secure the values, objectives, standards, and requirements of this Chapter, TMC Title 18, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and demonstrate the following: 1. The granting of the height waiver will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare, or injurious to other property, and will promote the public interest; and 2. A particular and identifiable hardship exists or a specific circumstance warrants the granting of a waiver. Factors to be considered in determining the existence of a hardship shall include, but not be limited to: a. Topography and other site features; b. Availability of alternative site locations; c. Geographic location of property; and d. Size/magnitude of project being evaluated and availability of co -location. B. In approving the waiver request, the Hearing Examiner may impose such conditions as it deems appropriate to substantially secure the objectives of the values, objectives, standards and requirements of this Chapter, TMC Title 18, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. C. A petition for any such waiver shall be submitted, in writing, by the applicant with the application for Hearing Examiner review. The petition shall state fully the grounds for the waiver and all of the facts relied upon by the applicant. This is an existing wireless facility. This project will not result in a significant change in visual impact and will not exceed 50 feet in height in this residential zone. Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Christine Contreras at (206) 523-1941. Sincerely, &ki4tine eartfuecuw Christine Contreras Ryka Consulting On behalf of T-MOBILE Wireless (206) 523-1941 f1 tiECEIVED UUU 212O1a TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS NON -IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION 0 r SITE NUMBER: SE03556D SITE NAME: Beacon & Bangor SCL SITE ADDRESS: 10405 51st Avenue S Seattle, WA 98178 DATE: July 7, 2015 PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. l 1 PROJECT The proposed T-Mobile project consists of a WCF (Wireless Communications Facility) with BTS equipment located at 10405 51st Avenue S, Seattle, WA 98178, King County parcel number 5476800305. The planned improvements include (3) replacement panel antennas on an 42' AGL SCL wooden glue -lam utility pole with supporting BTS (Base Transmission System) radio equipment located near the base of the utility pole. EQUIPMENT Type of Service: Broadband PCS, UMTS, LTE Antennas: Commscope SBNHH1D65C Sectors: 3 (alpha = 0°, beta = 90°, gamma = 170°) Antenna Rad Center: 41' AGL CALCULATIONS Calculations for RF power densities near ground level are based on the "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65" Edition 97-01, August 1997 issued by the Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. Section 2 of OET Bulletin 65 demonstrates that "for a truly worst -case prediction of power density at or near the surface, such as at ground -level or on a rooftop, 100% reflection of incoming radiation can be assumed, resulting in a potential doubling of predicted field strength and a four -fold increase in (far field equivalent) power density". Therefore the following equation is used: S = EIRP/rrR2 Where S = power density (mW/cm2), EIRP = equivalent isotropically radiated power and R = distance to the center of the radiation antenna (cm) Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Permissible Exposure) calculations using the above referenced formula and the antenna manufacturer vertical pattern information using a conservative 20 dB loss below main lobe. The calculations show that the maximum MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) at the base of the utility pole and the power density is 0.009198 mW/cm2 with an assumed worst -case power level of 2,000 watts ERP. This is 1.9697% of the / 1 MPE limit for the general population/uncontrolled exposure of 0.467 mW/cm2 as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A for the lowest frequency range. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Routine environmental evaluation is required if the PCS broadband facility is less than 10 m (32.81 feet) AGL and has a total power of all channels in any given sector greater than 2,000W ERP as referenced in "Table 2 Transmitters, Facilities and Operations subject to Routine environmental Evaluation" of Bulletin 65. As the proposed antennas lowest point above ground level is 10.7 m (35 feet), the WCF is categorically exempt from requirement for routine environmental processing. FCC COMPLIANCE The general population/uncontrolled exposure near the utility pole, including persons at ground level, surrounding properties, inside and utility pole on existing structures will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst case" scenario, which is a small fraction of the MPE limit. Only trained persons will be allowed to climb the utility pole for maintenance operations. T-Mobile and/or its contractors will provide training to make the employees fully aware of the potential for RF exposure occupational training and they can exercise control over their exposure that is within the occupational/controlled limits. CONCLUSIONS Based on calculations, the proposed WCF will comply with current FCC and county guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. All representations contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge. EXHIBITS • MPE Calculations • Antenna Product Data Sheets • WCF Location Map Effective tower height assumes a person 6 n tat. 41 height (ft) SE03556D Beacon and Bangor SCL MPE Calculations 9.20E-03 0.009198 max power density in mW/cm` 1.9697% percentage of standard tower height, Note: 0.467 mW/cm2 is 100% of allowable standard for lowest frequency horiz. Dist., x main beam effective radiation tower ERP ERP Power at point x center height mina lobe dB below horiz. dist. hyptonuse hypotenuse hypotenuse main lobe main lobe minor lobe mina lobe minor lobe at ground level (feet), y (feet), y angle main lobe x length (feet) length (km) length (cm) (watts) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP (mW) mW/cm"2 41 35 90 20 0.000 35.000 0.011 1066.800 2000 63.01 43.01 45.17 32887.43 TOTAL 7/7/2015 I 9.20E-03 I 9.20E-03 I i\ Product Specifications COMMS�JPE® POWERED BY ANDREW. SBNHH-1 D65C Andrew® Tri-band Antenna, 698-896 and 2 x 1710-2360 MHz, 65° horizontal beamwidth, internal RET. Both high bands share the same electrical tilt. o Interleaved dipole technology providing for attractive, low wind load mechanical package • Electrical Specifications Frequency Band, MHz 698-806 806-896 1710-1880 1850-1990 1920-2180 2300-2360 Gain, dBi 16.2 16.0 17.7 17.9 18.5 18.5 Beamwidth, Horizontal, degrees 66 64 70 65 63 58 Beamwidth, Vertical, degrees 8.9 7.8 5.7 5.2 5.0 4.4 Beam Tilt, degrees 0-11 0-11 0-7 0-7 0-7 0-7 USLS, dB 11 12 15 15 15 14 Front -to -Back Ratio at 180°, dB 29 31 27 27 28 27 CPR at Boresight, dB 27 21 18 19 16 19 CPR at Sector, dB 14 9 10 10 8 4 Isolation, dB 25 25 25 25 25 25 Isolation, Intersystem, dB 30 30 30 30 30 30 VSWR I Return Loss, dB 1.5 114.0 1.5 114.0 1.5 114.0 1.5 114.0 1.5 114.0 1.5 114.0 PIM, 3rd Order, 2 x 20 W, dBc -153 -153 -153 -153 -153 -153 Input Power per Port, maximum, watts 400 400 350 350 350 300 Polarization ±45° ±45° 145° ±45° ±45° 145° Impedance 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm Electrical Specifications, BASTA* Frequency Band, MHz 698-806 806-896 1710-1880 1850-1990 1920-2180 2300-2360 Gain by all Beam Tilts, average, dBi 15.8 15.6 17.3 17.8 18.2 18.1 Gain by all Beam Tilts Tolerance, dB ±0.4 ±0.5 ±0.3 ±0.2 ±0.5 ±0.4 0 ° 116.0 0 ° 115.8 0 ° 117.3 0 ° 117.7 0 ° 118.0 0 ° 117.9 Gain by Beam Tilt, average, dBi 5 ° 1 16.0 5 ° 115.8 4 ° 117.4 4 ° 1 17.8 4 ° 118.2 4 ° 1 18.2 11 ° 115.5 11 ° 115.2 7 ° 117.3 7 ° 117.7 7 ° 118.1 7 ° 118.2 Beamwidth, Horizontal Tolerance, degrees ±1.2 ±1.9 ±3.4 ±3.8 ±4.7 ±3.7 Beamwidth, Vertical Tolerance, degrees ±0.6 ±0.5 ±0.3 ±0.2 ±0.3 ±0.2 USLS, dB 13 14 17 16 17 15 Front -to -Back Total Power at 180° ± 30°, dB 26 24 27 25 25 26 CPR at Boresight, dB 29 22 20 21 19 21 CPR at Sector, dB 14 11 13 11 9 5 CommScope® supports NGMN recommendations on Base Station Antenna Standards (BASTA). To learn more about the benefits of BASTA, download the whitepaper Time to Raise the Bar on BSAs. General Specifications Antenna Brand Andrew® Antenna Type DualPol® multiband with internal RET Band Multiband Brand DualPol® I Teletilt® Operating Frequency Band 1710 - 2360 MHz I 698 - 896 MHz Mechanical Specifications ©2014 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks identified by ® or TM are registered trademarks, respectively, of CommScope. page 1 of 2 All specifications are subject to change without notice. See www.commscope.com for the most current information. Revised: October 22, 2014 October 29, 2014 / 1 Product Specifications COMMS�PE® SBNHH-1 D65C Color Lightning Protection Radiator Material Radome Material RF Connector Interface RF Connector Location RF Connector Quantity, total Wind Loading, maximum Wind Speed, maximum Dimensions Depth Length Width Net Weight POWERED BY ��NOREW. Light gray do Ground Aluminum I Low loss circuit board Fiberglass, UV resistant 7-16 DIN Female Bottom 6 879.0 N @ 150 km/h 197.6 lbf @ 150 km/h 241.4 km/h I 150.0 mph 181.0 mm I 7.1 in 2438.0 mm I 96.0 in 301.0 mm I 11.9 in 22.5 kg 1 49.6 lb Remote Electrical Tilt (RET) Information Input Voltage Power Consumption, idle state, maximum Power Consumption, normal conditions, maximum Protocol RET Interface RET Interface, quantity RET System Regulatory Compliance/Certifications Agency RoHS 2011/65/EU China Rol -IS SJ/T 11364-2006 ISO 9001:2008 2) 8 Included Products 10-30 Vdc 2.0 W 11.0 W 3GPP/AISG 2.0 (Multi-RET) 8-pin DIN Female I 8-pin DIN Male 1 female I 1 male Teletilt® Classification Compliant by Exemption Above Maximum Concentration Value (MCV) Designed, manufactured and/or distributed under this quality management system BSAMNT-1 — Wide Profile Antenna Downtilt Mounting Kit for 2.4 - 4.5 in (60 - 115 mm) OD round members. Kit contains one scissor top bracket set and one bottom bracket set. ©2014 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks identified by ® or TM are registered trademarks, respectively, of CommScope. page 2 of 2 All specifications are subject to change without notice. See www.commscope.com for the most current information. Revised: October 22, 2014 October 29, 2014 • SE03556D Beacon and Bangor SCL r,g S Norfolk St 5. CP • S Perry St 158 oDuwamisPr s_808tn Access Tuk d S 115th St N S1,`E.tihSt S-Bond St Kubota Gardens Seattle u) (!N.' > Q to Victo St" • H u) • o-a 17 s m� 'r v ' SE03556D Beacon and Bang... ,; Uy i 47.50631°N 122.27036°W ID ¢ S •� S 107th 'Si S Creston St IIE 158 , . 1 49th Ave S • S Hazel. St 53rd Ave S S Pilgrim:Si > 0* ▪ y,'o� 167 S o 1 (J (O > L0 Q Q to ♦ Kubota o Gardens - or)> to (A '9L tD S 1.0 0 is S Ryan St - S any 4199 57th Ave S S Bangor St t• to S Leo St c9 S Avon St ee S >>Qth St- oo/)(G4 '9L 157 , 061 14, V) S Prentice St to to 1 w > > a Q a s t rn 1 59th Ave S- 8 rn 66th S116thSt t o tP r� ite a 0 mi 0.2 0.4 Copyright 0 and (P) 1988-2010 Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com/streets/ Certain mapping and direction data 02010 NAVTEQ. All rights reserved. The Data for areas of Canada includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities, including: 0 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, ® Queen's Printer for Ontario. NAVTEQ and NAVTEQ ON BOARD are trademarks of NAVTEQ. 02010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. Tele Atlas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Atlas, Inc. ® 2010 by Applied Geographic Systems. All rights reserved. 0.6 r COMPLETE .APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: Items 1-9 are required for ALL Wireless Telecommunication Facilities. ✓ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. ✓ 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (5 copies). ✓ 3. Four sets of plans prepared by a design professional. The plans shall include a vicinity map, site map, architectural elevations, method of attachment, proposed screening, location of proposed antennas, and all other information which accurately depicts the proposed project. Minimum size is 8 1/2" x 11". Plans shall be no greater than 24" x 36". ✓ 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. ✓ 5. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). N/ A 6. SEPA Environmental Checklist. SEPA is not required when the facility: i) Is a microcell and is to be attached to an existing structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or a school; ii) Includes personal wireless antennas, other than a microcell, and is to be attached to an existing structure (that may be an existing tower) that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school, and the existing structure to which it is to be attached is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest or agriculture zone; or iii) Involves constructing a personal wireless tower less than sixty feet in height that is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone. ✓ 7. A letter from the applicant describing the proposed project and describing compliance with the City's Code requirements. 8. Sensitive Area studies and proposed mitigation (if required). WA_ 9. If an outdoor generator is proposed, a report prepared by an acoustical engineer demonstrating compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". Ai A If the application requires a Type 2 review these additional items are needed: ✓ 10. Four sets of photo simulations that depict the existing and proposed view of the proposed facility; 11. Materials board for the screening material; 12. Landscaping plan; ✓ 13. Letter from a radio frequency engineer that demonstrates that the facility meets Federal requirements for allowed emissions; 14. If the facility is located within a residential zone, a report from a radio frequency engineer explaining the need for the proposed wireless communication facility at that location. Additionally, the applicant shall provide detailed discussion on why the wireless communication facility cannot be located within a commercial or industrial zone. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri \Revisiors In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx / 1 Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning If the application requires a Type 3 review these additional items are needed: N/A 15. A narrative responding to the criteria at TMC Section 18.58.060. 16. The radio frequency engineer report shall include a discussion of the information required under TMC Section 18.58.070. The report shall also explain why a tower must be used instead of any of the other location options outlined in Table A. 17. Engineering Plans for the proposed tower. 18. A vicinity map depicting the proposed extent of the service area. 19. A graphic simulation showing the appearance of the proposed tower and ancillary structures and ancillary facilities from five points within the impacted vicinity. Such points are to be mutually agreed upon by the Director of DCD and applicant. All plans and photo simulations shall include the maximum build -out of the proposed facility. 20. Evidence of compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for height and lighting and certificates of compliance from all affected agencies. 21. Evidence that the tower has been designed to meet the minimum structural standards for wireless communication facilities for a minimum of three providers of voice, video or data transmission services, including the applicant, and including a description of the number and types of antennas the tower can accommodate. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: N/A 22. Payment of notice board fee (see Land Use Fee schedule) to FastSigns Tukwila OR provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). 23. Pay the fee as established by the Land Use Fee Schedule for generating mailing labels; OR provide an excel spreadsheet of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Each unit in multiple family buildings e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks --must be included. Once your project is assigned to a planner, you will be required to provide an electronic copy of the mailing label spreadsheet in the following format: Name, Street Address, City St Zip, with each of these fields as an individual column: Name Street Address City, St, Zip Mr. Smith 1234 Park Ave S Tukwila WA 98188 PLEASE NOTE: Regardless of whether you pay the City to generate the mailing labels or you provide them, there is an additional fee for postage and material as listed under Public Notice Mailing Fee on the Land Use Fee Schedule. Payment of this fee is due prior to issuance of the decision and you will receive a separate bill for this fee. 24. If providing own labels, include King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 WIRELESS TELE- COMMUNICATION FACILITIES INFORMATION City of Tukwila governs the placement of wireless telecommunication facilities under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.58. The review process for new antennas and facilities is based on the type of facility and the location of the facility. The City's goal is to streamline the placement of desirable facilities that are located on existing cell towers, within commercial and industrial zones, and on electrical transmission towers. TABLE A Type of Permit Required, Based on Type of Wireless Communication Facility Zoning» Type of Facility Residential Commercial Industrial Transmission tower co -location Type 1 Type 1 Type 1 Adding antennas to an existing tower Type 1(2) Type 1(2) Type 1(2) Utility pole co -location Type 2 Type 2 Type 2 Concealed building attached Type 2(3) Type 2(3) Type 1 Non -concealed building attached Type 2 Type 2 Type 1 New tower or waiver request Type 3 Type 3 Type 3 (2) (3) Zoning for any private/public property or right-of-way: Residential — LDR, MDR, or HDR. Commercial — O, MUO, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM TUC, C/LI or TVS. Industrial — LI, HI, MIC/L, or MIC/H. Provided the height of the tower does not increase and the square footage of the enclosure area does not increase. An applicant may request to install a non -concealed building attached facility, under TMC Section 18.58.150. \\deptstnm\City Common\Teri \Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan20l l.docx REQUIREMENTS: A. The following type of facilities are outright permitted uses: 1. Locating antennas on an electrical transmission tower. 2. Adding antennas to an existing tower; provided the height of the tower is not increased. 3. Locating antennas on an existing building that is zoned either LI, HI, MIC/L or MIC/H. The above facilities must obtain a Type I Wireless Facilities Permit. Specific design standards are listed later in this application. B. Administrative approval is required for the following facilities: 1. Utility Pole Co -Location 2. Installing antennas on an existing building which is located within a commercial or residential zone. Administrative review is conducted by the Director of Community Development and is made after a Notice of Application has been distributed to impacted agencies. The Type II process allows the Director to condition a project in order to ensure that the goals and policies of the City zoning code are met. C. The following facilities require review by the City's Hearing Examiner at a public hearing: 1. Permission to construct a new wireless telecommunications tower; 2. A height waiver request. PROCEDURES: At the time you submit your application you must have all of the items listed on the attached "Complete Application Checklist." You may request a waiver from items on the checklist that are not applicable to your project. Please discuss this waiver request with City staff either at a pre -application meeting or at the time of application submittal. Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff will determine if it is complete based on the attached checklist. If not complete City staff will mail you a letter outlining what additional information is needed. If you do not submit requested materials within 90 days from the City's request for additional information the City may cancel your application. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisiors In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 WIRELESS TELE- COMMUNICATION FACILITIES APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-WIRE Planner: File Number: L / 04 Application Complete Date: Project File Number:Z1, — , Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: T-Mobile @ SE03556D Beacon & Bangor/SCL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Antenna swap on existing wireless facility. CIRCLE TYPE - TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 (PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE RQD) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, ifvacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 10405 51st Ave South Seattle, WA 98178 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). Parcel# 5476800305 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Christine Contreras Address: 918 South Horton Street Suite#1002 Seattle, WA 98134 Phone: (206) 523-1941 FAX: (206) 260-7930 E-mail: ccontreras Signature: kaconsultin•.com Date: 06/18/2015 \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan201 l .docx / CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I . I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at f Q `/D 6 'it ,4 v' `3 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at S(A �` �G (city), Wi, ; (state), on 6 / % g 4 , 20 / (Print Name) • (Address) 206 6l� - (Phone Numb (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me eAtue ( r6" e to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentionOthettitu,1 _ �eW ��., Jane ,20 l S� SUBSCRIBEI�iRjW�'(?FORE ME ON THIS DAY OF ittaV % t; / ��• NO RYIC in an¢ for the State of Washington P j$ ' . ® residing at %4 io t el kl �} j --- -/...APT s4 ..%.oV' `��: My Commission expires on ((�l /4 '.Nbi ",,f ,• • .®p • r8 t \\deptstas\City Common \TenlRevisions In Progress \Wireless Communication Facility-1an201 l.docx 2 / • i WIRELESS COI INIUNICATION REQUIREMENTS The following are general requirements for all Wireless Communication Facilities. 1. Noise — Any facility that requires a generator or other device which will create noise must demonstrate compliance with TMC Chapter 8.22, "Noise". A noise report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted with any application to construct and operate a wireless communication facility that will have a generator or similar device. The City may require that the report be reviewed by a third party expert at the expense of the applicant. 2. Business license requirement — Any person, corporation or entity that operates a wireless conununication facility within the City shall have a valid business license issued annually by the City. Any person, corporation or other business entity which owns a tower also is required to obtain a business license on an annual basis. 3. Signage — Only safety signs or those mandated by other government entities may be located on wireless communication facilities. No other types of signs are permitted on wireless communication facilities. 4. Parking — Any application must demonstrate that there is sufficient space for temporary parking for regular maintenance of the proposed facility. 5. Finish — A tower shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish or, subject to any applicable standards of the FAA or FCC, be painted a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness. 6. Design — The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities with the natural setting and built environment. 7. Color — All antennas and ancillary facilities located on buildings or structures other than towers shall be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and ancillary facilities as visually unobtrusive as possible. 8. Lighting — Towers shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA, FCC or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the reviewing authority shall review the lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding areas. No strobe lighting of any type is permitted on any tower. 9. Advertising — No advertising is permitted at wireless communication facility sites or on any ancillary structure or facilities equipment compound. 11. Equipment Enclosure — Each applicant shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet at each site. However, this restriction shall not apply to enclosures located within an existing commercial, industrial, residential or institutional building. SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS BASED ON TYPE OF FACILITY 18.58.080 Electrical Transmission Tower Co -Location -Specific Development Standards. The following requirements shall apply: 1. Height — There is no height requirement for antennas that are located on electrical transmission towers. 2. Antenna aesthetics — There are no restrictions on the type of antennas located on the electrical transmission tower. The antennas must be painted to match the color of the electrical transmission tower. 3. Antenna intensity — There is no limit on the number of antennas that may be located on an electrical transmission tower structure. 4. Feed lines and coaxial cables — shall be attached to one of the legs of the electrical transmission tower. The feed lines and cables must be painted to match the color of the electrical transmission tower. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri \Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx 5. Cabinet equipment — Cabinet equipment shall be located directly under the electrical transmission tower where the antennas are located or a concealed location. The wireless communication equipment compound shall be fenced; the fence shall have a minimum height of 6 feet and a maximum height of 8 feet. The fence shall include slats, wood panels, or other materials to screen the equipment from view. Barbed wire may be used in a utility right-of-- way that is not zoned residential. 6. Setbacks — Since the facility will be located on an existing electrical transmission tower, setbacks shall not apply. 18.58.090 Adding Antennas to Existing WCF Tower -Specific Development Standards. 1. Height — The height must not exceed what was approved under the original application to construct the tower. If the height shall exceed what was originally approved, approval as a Type 2 decision is required for any height which will be less than the maximum height of the zone. 2. Antenna aesthetics — Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the tower. 3. Antenna intensity — There is no limit on the number of antennas that may be located on an existing tower. 4. Feed lines and coaxial cables — Feed lines and coaxial cables shall be located within the tower. Any exposed feed lines or coaxial cables (such as when extended out of the tower to connect to the antennas) must be painted to match the tower. 5. Cabinet equipment — A new cabinet shall be located within the equipment enclosure that was approved as part of the original application. If the applicant wishes to expand the equipment enclosure from what was approved by the City or County under the previous application, the applicant shall seek a wireless communication facility (Type 2) application for only the equipment enclosure increase. 6. Setbacks — Setbacks shall not apply when an applicant installs new antennas on an existing tower and uses an existing equipment enclosure. If the equipment enclosure is increased, it must meet setbacks. 18.58.100 Concealed Building Mounted Development Requirements. 1. Height — The proposed facility must meet the height requirement of the applicable zoning category. The antennas can qualify under TMC Section 18.50.080, "Rooftop Appurtenances", if the antennas are located in a church spire, chimney or fake chimney, elevator tower, mechanical equipment room, or other similar rooftop appurtenances usually required to be placed on a roof and not intended for human occupancy. Stand-alone antennas shall not qualify as rooftop appurtenances. 2. Antennas aesthetics — The antennas must be concealed from view by blending with the architectural style of the building. This could include steeple -like structures and parapet walls. The screening must be made out of the same material and be the same color as the building. Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the building(s). 3. Feed lines and coaxial cables — Feed lines and cables should be located below the parapet of the rooftop. 4. Cabinet equipment — If cabinet equipment cannot be located within the building where the wireless communication facilities will be located, then the City's first preference is to locate the equipment on the rooftop of the building. If the equipment can be screened by placing the equipment below the parapet walls, no additional screening is required. If screening is required, then the proposed screening must be consistent with the existing building in terms of color, style, architectural style and material. If the cabinet equipment is to be located on the ground, the equipment must be fenced with a 6-foot-tall fence, and materials shall be used to screen the equipment from view. Barbed wire may be used in the TVS, LI, HI, MIC/L, and MIC/H zones. 5. Setbacks — The proposed wireless communication facilities facility must meet the setback of the applicable zoning category where the facility is to be located. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri \Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan20ll.docx 18.58.110 Non -concealed Building Mounted Development Requirements. 1. Height — The proposed facility must meet the height requirements of the applicable zoning category. If the building where the facility is located is at or above the maximum height requirements, the antennas are permitted to extend a maximum of 3 feet above the existing roof line. Non -concealed building mounted facilities shall not qualify as "Rooftop Appurtenances" under TMC 18.50.080. 2. Antenna aesthetics — The first preference for any proposed facility is to utilize flush -mounted antennas. Nonflush- mounted antennas may be used when their visual impact will be negated by the scale of the antennas to the building. "Shrouds" are not required unless they provide a better visual appearance than exposed antennas. Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the building(s). 3. Feed lines and coaxial cables — Feed lines and cables should be located below the parapet of the rooftop. If the feed lines and cables must be visible, they must be painted to match the color scheme of the building(s). 4. Cabinet equipment — If cabinet equipment cannot be located within the building where the wireless communication facilities will be located, then it must be located on the rooftop of the building. If the equipment can be screened by placing the equipment below the parapet walls, no additional screening is required. If screening is required, then the proposed screening must be consistent with the existing building in terms of color, style, architectural style and material. If the cabinet equipment is to be located on the ground, the equipment must be fenced with a 6-foot-tall fence and materials shall be used to screen the equipment from view. Barbed wire may be used in the TVS, LI, HI, MIC/L, and MIC/H zones. 18.58.120 Utility Pole Co -location 1. Height — The height of a utility pole co -location is limited to 10 feet above the replaced utility pole, and may be not greater than 50 feet in height in residential zones. Within all other zones, the height of the utility pole is limited to 50 feet or the minimum height standards of the underlying zoning, whichever is greater. 2. Replacement pole — The replaced utility pole must be used by the owner of the utility pole to support its utility lines (phone lines or electric). A replaced utility pole cannot be used to provide secondary functions to utility poles in the area. 3. Pole aesthetics — The replaced utility pole must have the color and general appearance of the adjacent utility poles. 4. Coaxial cables — Coax cables limited to %z" in diameter may be attached directly to a utility pole. Coax cables greater than Y2' must be placed within the utility pole. The size of the cables is the total size of all coax cables being utilized on the utility pole. 5. Pedestrian impact — The proposal shall not result in a significant change in the pedestrian environment or preclude the City from making pedestrian improvements. If a utility pole is being replaced, consideration must be made to improve the pedestrian environment if necessary. 6. Cabinet equipment — Unless approved by the Director of Public Works, all cabinet equipment and the equipment enclosure must be placed outside of City right-of-way. If located on a parcel that contains a building, the equipment enclosure must be located next to the building. The cabinet equipment must be screened from view. The screening must be consistent with the existing building in terms of color, style, architectural style and material. If the cabinet equipment is to be located on the ground, the equipment must be fenced with a 6-foot-tall fence and materials shall be used to screen the equipment from view. Barbed wire may be used in the TVS, LI, HI, MIC/L, and MIC/H zones. 7. Setbacks — Any portion of the wireless communication facilities located within City right-of-way is not required to meet setbacks. The City will evaluate setbacks on private property under the setback requirements set forth in TMC Section 18.58.170. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx 18.58.130 Tower -Specific Development Standards 1. Height — Any proposed tower with antennas shall meet the height standards of the zoning district where the tower will be located. 2. Antenna and tower aesthetics — The applicant shall utilize a wireless communication concealed facility. The choice of concealing the wireless communication facility must be consistent with the overall use of the site. For example, having a tower appear like a flagpole would not be consistent if there are no buildings on the site. If a flag or other wind device is attached to the pole, it must be appropriate in scale to the size and diameter of the tower. 3. Setbacks — The proposed wireless communication facilities must meet the setbacks of the underlying -zoning district. If an exception is granted under TMC Section 18.58.180 with regards to height, the setback of the proposed wireless communication facilities will increase 2 feet for every foot in excess of the maximum permitted height in the zoning district. 4. Color — The color of the tower shall be based on the surrounding land uses. 5. Feed lines and coaxial cables — All feed lines and cables must be located within the tower. Feed lines and cables connecting the tower to the equipment enclosure, which are not located within the wireless communication facility equipment compound, must be located underground. The City prefers the use of concealed building mounted facilities in lieu of non -concealed facilities. However, in some cases using a non -concealed facility may allow a wireless facility to blend with the environment. An applicant may request to use a non -concealed facility and will be evaluated under the following criteria: 1. An applicant for a wireless communication facility can demonstrate that placing the facility on certain portions of a property will provide better screening and aesthetic considerations than provided under the existing setback requirements; or 2. The modification will aid in retaining open space and trees on the site; or 3. The proposed location allows for the wireless communication facility to be located a greater distance from residentially -zoned (LDR, MDR, and HDR) properties. 18.58.150 Landscaping/Screening. A. The visual impacts of wireless communication facilities may be mitigated and softened through landscaping or other screening materials at the base of the tower, facility equipment compound, equipment enclosures and ancillary structures, with the exception of wireless communication facilities located on transmission towers, or if the antenna is mounted flush on an existing building, or camouflaged as part of the building and other equipment is housed inside an existing structure. The DCD Director, Director of Public Works or Planning Commission, as appropriate, may reduce or waive the standards for those sides of the wireless communication facility that are not in public view, when a combination of existing vegetation, topography, walls, decorative fences or other features achieve the same degree of screening as the required landscaping; in locations where the visual impact of the tower would be minimal; and in those locations where large wooded lots and natural growth around the property perimeter may be sufficient buffer. B. Landscaping shall be installed on the outside of fences. Existing vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent practicable and may be used as a substitute for or as a supplement to landscaping or screening requirements. The following requirements apply: 1. Screening landscaping shall be placed around the perimeter of the equipment cabinet enclosure, except that a maximum 10-foot portion of the fence may remain without landscaping in order to provide access to the enclosure. 2. The landscaping area shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width around the perimeter of the enclosure. 3. The applicant shall utilize evergreens that shall be a minimum of 6 feet tall at the time of planting. 4. Applicant shall utilize irrigation or an approved maintenance schedule that will insure that the plantings are established after two years from the date of planting. \\deptstnre\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Ian2011.docx C. The applicant shall replace any unhealthy or dead plant materials in conformance with the approved landscaping development proposal, and shall maintain all landscape materials for the life of the facility. In the event that landscaping is not maintained at the required level, the Director, after giving 30 days advance written notice, may maintain or establish the landscaping at the expense of the owner or operator and bill the owner or operator for such costs until such costs are paid in full. 18.58.160 Zoning Setback Exceptions. A. Generally, wireless communication facilities placed on private property must meet setbacks of the underlying zoning. However, in some circumstances, allowing modifications to setbacks may better achieve the goal of this Chapter of concealing such facilities from view. B. The Director or Hearing Examiner, depending on the type of application, may permit modifications to be made to setbacks when: 1. An applicant for a wireless communication facility can demonstrate that placing the facility on certain portions of a property will provide better screening and aesthetic considerations than provided under the existing setback requirements; or 2. The modification will aid in retaining open space and trees on the site; or 3. The proposed location allows for the wireless communication facility to be located a greater distance from residentially -zoned (LDR, MDR, and HDR) properties. C. This zoning setback modification cannot be used to waive/modify any required setback required under the State Building Code or Fire Code. 18.58.170 Height Waivers. Where the Hearing Examiner fmds that extraordinary hardships, practical difficulties, or unnecessary and unreasonable expense would result from strict compliance with the height limitations of the Zoning Code, or the purpose of these regulations may be served to a greater extent by an alternative proposal, it may approve a height waiver to these regulations; provided that the applicant demonstrates that the waiver(s) will substantially secure the values, objectives, standards, and requirements of this Chapter, TMC Title 18, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and demonstrate the following: 1. The granting of the height waiver will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare, or injurious to other property, and will promote the public interest; and 2. A particular and identifiable hardship exists or a specific circumstance warrants the granting of a waiver. Factors to be considered in determining the existence of a hardship shall include, but not be limited to: a. Topography and other site features; b. Availability of alternative site locations; c. Geographic location of property; and d. Size/magnitude of project being evaluated and availability of co -location. B. In approving the waiver request, the Hearing Examiner may impose such conditions as it deems appropriate to substantially secure the objectives of the values, objectives, standards and requirements of this Chapter, TMC Title 18, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. C. A petition for any such waiver shall be submitted, in writing, by the applicant with the application for Hearing Examiner review. The petition shall state fully the grounds for the waiver and all of the facts relied upon by the applicant. 18.58.180 Expiration. Any application to install or operate a wireless communications facility shall expire exactly one year from the date of issuance of the application unless significant progress has been made to construct the facility. The City may extend the expiration period by up to one additional year due to circumstances outside of the control of the applicant. However, the City shall not issue an extension if any revisions have occurred to the City's Zoning Code which would affect the wireless communication facility approved application. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\Revisions In Progress\Wireless Communication Facility-Jan2011.docx BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 51STAVE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 Photographic Simulation Locator Not to Scale 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE t425h 398;7600 l3arigor � raa 39 ston-St BEACON & BANGORISCL SE035560 10405 51STAVE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 EXISTING PHOTO #1 FROM BEACON AVE S LOOKING NORTH-EAST 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-766O0 BEACON & BAN OR/SCL SE03556© 10405 51STAVE SOUTH SEATTLE. WA 98178 PROPOSED PHOTO #1 FROM BEACON AVE S LOOKING NORTH-EAST 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 BEACON & BAN6R/SCL SE03556D 10405 51 ST AVE SOUTH SEATTLE. WA 98178 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA98011 EXISTING PHOTO #2 FROM BEACON AVE S LOOKING SOUTH-EAST I OFFICE (425) 398-7800 BEACON & BAN' R/SC1. SE035560 10405 51STAVE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 PROPOSED PHOTO #2 FROM BEACON AVE S LOOKING SOUTH-EAST 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 1 \ BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 51 ST AVE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 EXISTING PHOTO #3 FROM 51STAVE S LOOKING SOUTH-WEST ' 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWX N BOTHELL. WA98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 51 ST AVE SOUTH SEATTLE. WA 98178 PROPOSED PHOTO #3 FROM 51STAVE S LOOKING SOUTH-VVEST 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 ■ ■ ■ ■m BEACON 10405 51ST b•i & BANGOR/SCL AVENUE SOUTH RYICA<,CONSULTING ■ SEATTLE, WA 98178 SITE NUMBER: SE03556D LATITUDE 47° 30' 22.72" N (47.506311) LONGITUDE 122° 16' 13.3" W (-122.270361) GENERAL LOCATION MAP DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAWING INDEX FROM T-MOBILE BOTHELL 4 OFFICE: PROPERTY/ DOUG HABERMAN T-MOBILE PROPOSES TO REPLACE EXISTING (3) T-1 TITLE SHEET & PROJECT DATA 5 t1itl ,,,,, - TOWER WIRELESS CO -LOCATIONS PROGRAM ANTENNAS W/ (3) NEW COMMSCOPE #SBNHH-1D65C G-1 GENERAL NOTES k _ .,. `• 1. MERGE ONTO 1-405 S 23.7 MI OWNER: MANAGER SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ANTENNAS. A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN , 02. TAKE THE EXIT ONTO 1-5 N TOWARD SEATTLE 3.2 MI 3613 4TH AVE S, SS REPLACE EXISTING STYLE 4 TMA'S W/ (3) NEW A-1.1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN , 3. TAKE EXIT 157 FOR M L KING WAY 0.3 MI 4. MERGE ONTO MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY S 0.3 SEATTLE, WA 98134 (6) STYLE 3C TMA'S & REPI ACE EXISTING (6) DIPLEXERS A-2 SITE ELEVATION MI PHONEs: 206 iar9i38 W/ (3) NEW AWS/700 TWIN DIPLEXERS. A-3 GENERAL DETAILS sz ^ 0 5. TURN RIGHT ONTO S RYAN WAY 0.5 MI PROJECT RYKA CONSULTING E-1 ELECTRICAL GROUNDING PLAN v ? 6. TURN RIGHT ONTO 51ST AVE S DESTINATION WILL MANAGER: JESSICA PIERCE KEEP EXISTING (6) STYLE 4 TMA'S & (6) DIPLEXERS. E-2 ELECTRICAL GROUNDING DETAILS IAv rcS BE ON THE RIGHT 0.2 MI 918 S HORTON ST #1002 RF-1 RF DETAILS SEATTLE, WA 98134 RF-2 RF DETAILS PHONE #: 206 200 8333 PROJECT INFORMATION THIS IS UNSTAFFED AND RESTRICTED EQUIPMENT °' - ' CONSTRUCTION RYKA CONSULTING AND WILL BE USED FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF Q MANAGER: STEVE EVENSON RADIO SIGNALS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING 918 S HORTON ST #1002 SEATTLE, WA 98134- PUBLIC CELLULAR SERVICE. T-MOBILE CERTIFIES THAT THIS TELEPHONE RA,s v - PHONE #: 206-523-1941 EQUIPMENT FACILITY WILL BE SERVICED ONLY BY T-MOBILE EMPLOYEES AND THE WORK ASSOCIATED SITE RYKA CONSULTING W WITH ANY EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE PERFORMED BY ACQUISITION: NICOLE GATEMAN HANDICAPPED PERSONS. THIS FACILITY WILL BE 918 S HORTON ST #1002 FREQUENTED ONLY BY SERVICE PERSONNEL FOR REPAIR PURPOSES. PURSUANT TO THE AMERICANS — e ZONING INFORMATION SEATTLE, WA 98134 WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), APPENDIX B SECTION /w ■, a1<mo»- a SITE NUMBER: SE03556D PHONE # 206 523 1941 4.11. (5)(b), THIS FACILITY IS EXEMPT FROM THAT �!�■sr"I� SITE NAME: BEACON & BANGOR/SCL ACT. SITE ADRESS: t0405 51ST AVENUE SOUTH ZONING: RYKA CONSULTING NO POTABLE WATER SUPPLY IS TO BE PROVIDED AT VIe.INITY MAP SEATTLE, WA 98178 JESSE LONDON THIS LOCATION. 'on'-" PARCEL #. 5476800305 918 S HORTON ST #1002 SEATTLE, WA 98134 NO WASTE WATER OR SOLID WASTE WILL BE GENERATED AT THIS LOCATION. CURRENT ZONING: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PHONE #: 206-523-1941 T-MOBILE MAINTENANCE CREW (ONE PERSON) WILL 1 JURISDICTION: CITY OF TUKWILA MAKE AN AVERAGE OF ONE TRIP PER MONTH AT ONE SW r GOVERNING CODE: 2012 IBC RF ENGINEER: T-MOBILE H HOUR PER TRIP. - c4* BUILDING TYPE: - DAVE GIRLING CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVAL/SIGN OFF OF CONST DRAWINGS r SITE TYPE: UNSTAFFED TELECOMM FACILITY ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED REVIEWERS SHALL CLEARLY PLACE INITIALS ADJACENT TO EACH g UTILITY PURVEYOR AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REDLINE NOTE AS DRAWINGS ARE BEING REVIEWED. POWER COMPANY: N/A CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS CONSULTANT GROUP SIGN OFF • O ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING ON THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED LANDLORD'S REPRESENTATIVE: DATE: - r, •1, , s o0'r s• TELCO COMPANY: N/A CONSULTING B.J. THOMAS, P.E. TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: DATE: s 5T,..„ S, ENGINEER: 7607 80TH AVE NE CODES: CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: A LEGAL DESCRIPTION MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 PHONE: 206 851-1106 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: pM ABBREVIATED PER ASSESSOR RECORDS. 2012 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE SITE ACQUISITION: DATE: 2012 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE NFPA 54 NATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE ZONING: DATE: MERRICKS ACRE TRS DIV # 2 C OF S TRAN LN RAN 2 2012 - (PROPANE INSTALLATIONS ONLY) RF ENGINEER: DATE: ti ' Bangor SI v r ' OVER TRS 17-18-19 2011 NFPA 58 - LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS CODE (PROPANE INSTALLATIONS ONLY) 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE 2012 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODER 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2007 NATIONAL ELECTRIC SAFETY CODE ‘ ,_ SAFETY PRECAUTION CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 811 NATIONAL UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATE SHALL ELECTRIC - RED TEUCATV - ORANGE 7. s c a+ =: - 0 .,, s.5, LOCAL BUILDING CODE ORDINANCES ANSI /TIAlEIA-222-G NFPA-101 - LIFE SAFETY CODE BE IMPLEMENTED BY CONTRACTOR(S) AT ALL SEWER -GREEN PROPOSED -WHITE R TRENCHING IN ACCORDANCE GAS/OIL - YELLOW WATER - BLUE CURRENT WITHSTANDARDS OSHA SURVEY - PINK T--Mobile- PROJECT INFORMATION: BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 S1ST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FOR: [ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT —REVISION HISTORY: CMG NO. DATE: DESCRIPTION: DY: A3\ //f \\\ 5/912015 REV. PER 1-A BJT 1 522015 REV. PER REDLINES BJT ^' / . 3/312015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT =PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851.1106 —DRAWN BY CHK. BY: JL BJ LICENSURE: B j =r ." s19(15 - URISDICTIONAL APPROVAL: 4/salk •uo39 DRAWING TITLE: TITLE SHEET DRAWING NUMBER: T-1 I GENERAL NOTES: 1. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSED ONLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ANY REQUIREMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INSTALLATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS AND OWNER'S PROJECT MANUAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND STANDARDIZED DETAILS THAT REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS DUE TO ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY, T-MOBILE WIRELESS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. CONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION, ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER VERBALLY AND IN WRITING. 4. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, SAFETY, AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'SNENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS ANC) LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE, AT THE PROJECT SITE, A FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. THIS SET IS A VALID CONTRACT DOCUMENT ONLY IF THE TITLE SHEET IS STAMPED IN RED INK "FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND EACH SUCCESSIVE SHEET BEARS THE ARCHITECTS/ENGINEER'S SIGNED WET STAMP. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATELY BRACING AND PROTECTING ALL WORK DURING CONSTRUCTION AGAINST DAMAGE, BREAKAGE, COLLAPSE, ETC. ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR ALL DAMAGES TO BETTER THAN NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSULTANT OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE BUILDING SITE OR ANY ADJACENT STRUCTURES AROUND THE PROJECT. THE T-MOBILE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE SOLE AND FINAL JUDGE AS TO THE QUALITY OF THE REPAIRED CONSTRUCTION. ANY ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS WHICH MUST BE MADE SHALL BE MADE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12. WHERE NEW PAVING, CONCRETE SIDEWALKS OR PATHS MEET EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING PITCH, GRADE, AND ELEVATION SO THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH TRANSITION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MODIFY THE EXISTING FLOORS, WALL, CEILING, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO GAIN ACCESS TO AREAS FOR ALL MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, OR STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS. WHERE THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DOORS, PARTITIONS, CEILING, ETC., ARE TO BE REMOVED, MODIFIED, OR REARRANGED OR WHERE THE EXPOSED OR HIDDEN MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, SYSTEMS ARE ADDED OR MODIFIED, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR, PATCH AND MATCH ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND FINISHES OF ALL FLOORS WALLS AND CEILINGS. WHERE CONCRETE MASONRY CONSTRUCTION IS MODIFIED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TOOTH IN ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH THE EXISTING BOND. WHERE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION IS MODIFIED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT DETAILS TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL WORK SHALL BE COVERED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACT. 14. IF CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR FIND IT NECESSARY TO DEVIATE FROM ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS, THEN IT IS THE CONTRACTORS AND THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE CONSULTANT WITH 4 COPIES OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES FOR HIS APPROVAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. IN ADDITION THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROCURING ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS FROM THE BUILDING AUTHORITIES FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROCURING ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS FROM BUILDING AUTHORITIES DURING THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 15. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A10BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM WORK DURING OWNER'S PREFERRED HOURS TO AVOID DISTURBING NORMAL BUSINESS. 17. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE -RATED AREAS WITH U.L. LISTED OR FIRE MARSHAL APPROVED MATERIALS AS APPLICABLE TO THIS FACILITY AND OR PROJECT SITE. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR UTILITY LOCATES, SCHEDULING, COORDINATING SPECIAL AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING AND UTILIZING ORIGINAL ROOFING CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING ROOFING WARRANTY. 20. ROUTING OF ALL CONDUITS, CABLES, CABLE TRAYS ETC ARE INDICATED AS PROPOSED LOCATION ONLY. CONFIRM THE EXACT LOCATION AND ROUTING WITH THE ON SITE T-MOBILE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. CONCRETE NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318 AND THE SPECIFICATION CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS UNO. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD UNO. 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH - 3 IN. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: #6 AND LARGER 2 IN. #5 AND SMALLER & WWF 112IN. 5. A 1/2" TROWELED RADIUS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE UNO. HOLES TO RECEIVE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHORS SHALL BE 1/8" LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD AND SHALL CONFORM TO MFR RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. AVOID CUTTING EXISTING REBAR WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN THE ELEVATED SLAB. 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES. 7. FLOAT SURFACE SHALL BE A SMOOTH FINISH. SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL OBVIOUS DEPRESSIONS. SURFACE SHALL BE SLOPED AT 2 "=: TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EQUIPMENT. ABBREVIATIONS AC AFF AFS ALUM BATCH BLDG BM B.O. BOOS CLG COL CONC CONST CON TR T DIA/0 DTL EA ELEC EQ EW EXP EXT FIN FIN FLR FTG GA GLV Y GB HM HOR HR HVAC INSUL INT AIR CONDITIONER ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ABOVE FINISHED GRADE ABOVE FINISHED SLAB ALUMINUM ANCHOR BOLT ANGLE ARCHITECTURAL BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BUILDING BBOTTOM BOTTOM OF BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BOTTOM OF STEEL CONTROL JOINT CENTER LINE CEILING CLCONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLUMN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CENTER DIAMETER DETAIL EXISTING EACH EXPANSION JOINT ELECTRIC/ELECTRICAL ELEVATION EQUAL EACH WAY EXPANSION EXTERIOR FLOOR DRAIN FINISH FINISH FLOOR FLOOR FOOTING GAUGE GALVANIZED GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HOUR HEIGHT HEATING VENTILATION AIR CONDITIONING VCT INSULATION VERT INTERIOR W/ WWM JT LAM F MANUF MAX MECH MH MM MIN MISC MPH MTL NIC OM NTS OD OH OPNG OPP (P) PCS PR PSI PSF PR D REINFD RM RAN SCHED SECT SF SIM SSA STD STL TTRUC TEMP THK T.O. TOS TYOP UNO CONCRETE NOTES: 1. RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 2. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE PCS EQUIPMENT, TOWER AREAS, AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS. 3. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 4. THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO THE CRUSHED STONE APPLICATION. 5. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. 6. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND SHALL BE CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO i - E APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING. 7. THE AREAS OF THE CUSTOMER'S PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE BUILDING, DRIVEWAY OR CRUSHED STONE, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED, SEEDED, AND COVERED WITH MULCH AS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE WORK. 8. BEDDING MATERIAL FOR UTILITY UNES, CULVERTS AND PIPING: CLEAN SAND, MEDIUM TP COARSE, SUB ROUNDED NATURAL RIVER OR BANK SAND, WASHED, FREE OF SILT OR CLAY, LOAM, FRIABLE OR SOLUBLE MATERIALS, AND ORGANIC MATER GRADED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION: SIEVE SIZE 3/8" NO. 4 MESH NO. 8 MESH NO. 16 MESH NO. 100MESH NO. 200 MESH PERCENT PASSING 100 60-90 0-45 0-25 0-2 0-2 9. MPS FOR TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PER LOCAL, CITY OR COUNTY GUIDELINES AND PER PLAN IF APPLICABLE. LEGENDS & SYMBOLS JOINT LAMINATED LINEAL FOOT MANUFACTURER MAXIMUM MECHANICAL MANHOLE MILLIMETER MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MILES PER HOUR METAL NOT IN CONTRACT NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVERHEAD OPENING OPPOSITE PROPOSED PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PLATE PAIR POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PRESSURE TREATED RADIUS ROOF DRAIN REINFORCED/REINFORCING REQUIRED ROOM ELEVATION VIEW BUG RIGHT OF WAY SCHEDULE SECTION SQUARE FOOT SIMILAR SQUARE FOOT STAINLESS STEEL DETAIL BUG STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURAL TEMPORARY THICK TOP OF TOP OF STEEL .-DETAIL NUMBER TOP OF CONCRETE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERTICAL WELDED WIRE MESH Olt 01/ DETAIL NUMBER 40( SHEET NUMBER TOP OF XXXXX XXX'-X" AGL CHAIN LINK FENCE CEDAR FENCE I I I POWER - P - P - P - P - P - P - TELCO - T - T - T - T - T - T - POWER/TELCO - P - T - P - T - P - T - COAX - COAX - COAX - COAX - COAX - OVERHEAD POWER -0/1 CENTERLINE - REVISION BUG ELEVATION VIEW BUG SECTION BUG L f-�C2 '7 DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SHEET NUMBER TS - -Mobile- =PROJECT INFORMATION: BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 S1ST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FOR: [-ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT REVISION HISTORY: COIL NO. DAM: DESCRIPTION: ST: A5/9/2015 REV. PER 1-A BJT /.,\ /// 5/2/2015 REV. PER REDLINES BIT \ 3,312015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW 13.17 -PLANS PREPARED BY B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 -DRAWN BY: CHK. BY: JL BJ -LICENSURE: B, .''"; .`519(15 -JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. -DRAWING TITLE: GENERAL NOTES NUMBER: -DRAWING G.1 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY: ALL INFORMATION AND TRUE NORTH HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM EXISTING DRAWINGS AND ARE APPROXIMATE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MERRICKS ACRE TRS DIV # 2 C OF S TRAN LN RAN OVER TRS 17-18-19. PARCEL #5476800305 1 { 1 (E) T-MOBILE WOOD FENCED COMPOUND (SEE SHT. A-1.1 FOR ENLARGED SITE PLAN) \ V (E) GATE ON FENCED COMPOUND V l (E) 4Z-9" AGL WOOD GLUELAM UTILITY POLE W/ (P) T-MOBILE REPLACEMENT ANTENNAS AT TOP (SEE SHT. A-1.1 FOR ENLARGED SITE PLAN) OVERALL SITE PLAN 422x34 SCALE: 1" = 10' 11 x17 SCALE: 1" = 20' 10' 0 ?' 10' 20' N PROPERTY LINE - 30.13' 1 1-o �O PARCEL SI #5476800305 1Z 1m J IiifJ PROPERTY LINE - 20.51 S 3f1N3A`d ISLS 1 S BANGOR STREET T • •Mob ile- =PROJECT INFORMATION: BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 SIST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FOR: [-ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT HISTORY. -REVISION OWL NO. DAM DESCRIPTION: BY: /3\ 5/92015 REV. PER 1-A BJT / \ 5RRD15 REV. PER REDLINES BJT ^` / \ 3,31/2015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BR =PLANS PREPARED BY B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851.1106 -DRAWN BY: CHIC. BY• JL BJ -LICENSURE: Vr Y'4519115 =JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL -DRAWING TITLE. OVERALL SITE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER: A-1 1 I (E) (6) ANDREW DIPLEXERS MOUNTED ON UNISTRUT (P) 1" RIGID CONDUIT FROM (P) FRLB TO BE REPLACED W/ (P) (3) AWS/700 TWIN DIPLEXERS J-BOX TO PURCELL CABINET (TYP OF 1 TWIN DIPLEXER PER SECTOR) I (P) (3) FRLB MOUNTED ON UNISTRUT (TYP OF 1 PER SECTOR) (SEE SHT. A-3: DETAIL 5) (E) T-MOBILE BTS CABINETS INSTALL GRAVEL & WEED BLOCK FABRIC IN FRONT OF GATE (E) (1) T-MOBILE TMBXX-6516-R2M ANTENNA TO BE REPLACED W/ (1) NEW COMMSCOPE #SBNHH-1D65C ANTENNA (ALPHA SECTOR:O° AZIMUTH) (P) (3) STYLE 3C TMA'S & (E) (6) STYLE 4 TMA'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (REMOVE (6) STYLE 4 TMA'S) (E) 47-6" AGL WOOD GLUELAM UTILITY POLE 000) r (E) (6) ANDREW DIPLEXERS MOUNTED ON UNISTRUT TO REMAIN (TYP OF 2 PER SECTOR) < < r 8 J i (E) (12) 7/8" COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN U/G PVC CONDUITS (P) 2" x 8' STD PIPE MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE MAST W/ (P) PIPE TO PIPE CLAMP (TYP OF ALL SECTORS) (SEE SHT. A-3: DETAIL 4) (E) (1) T-MOBILE TMBXX-6516-R2M ANTENNA TO BE REPLACED W/ (1) NEW COMMSCOPE #SBNHH-1D65C ANTENNA (BETA SECTOR: 90° AZIMUTH) (E) (1) T-MOBILE TMB00X-6516-R2M ANTENNA TO BE REPLACED W/ (1) NEW COMMSCOPE #SBNHH-1 D65C ANTENNA (GAMMA SECTOR: 170° AZIMUTH) ENLARGED SITE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 1/2"= 1' 11x17 SCALE: 1/4°= 1' (E) WOOD FENCED COMPOUND (E) T-MOBILE UTILITY H-FRAME i I f 1 i Ti --Mob ile- -PROJECT INFORMATION: BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 51ST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FOR CISSUED BUILDING PERMIT —REVISION HISTORY. CNK NO. DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: /5/9/2015 3\ REV. PER 1-A BJT n //.�\ /ft\` \ 5/2/2015 REV. PER REDLINES BJT 3/31/2015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT —PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 76O78OTHAVENE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851.1106 DRAWN BY" CHK. BY: JL BJ —LICENSURE: .r- r''\ .5l9115 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. =DRAWING TITLE. ENLARGED SITE PLAN —DRAWING NUMBER. A MI 1 1 TOP OF GLUELAM POLE 42'-6" AGL T-MOBILE RAD CENTER 39'-10" AGL (E) (12) STYLE 4 TMA'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (TYP OF 4 PER SECTOR) (E) (3) T-MOBILE #TMBXX-6516-R2M ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON WOOD GLUELAM POLE (TYP OF 1 PER SECTOR) OVERHEAD LINE 32.3' AGL (E) SECONDARY LINE zrz--(E) T-MOBILE WOOD FENCED COMPOUND EDEXISTING WEST ELEVATION SCALE: NTS 4.-9" (E) 42'-6" AGL WOOD GLUELAM POLE (E) (12) 7/8" COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN GLUELAM POLE (P) 2" x 8' STD PIPE MOUNTED TO (E) PIPE MAST W/ (P) PIPE TO PIPE CLAMP (TYP OF ALL SECTORS) (SEE SHT. A-3: DETAIL 4) TOP OF (P) ANTENNAS 45'-0" AGL dap TOP OF GLUELAM POLE 47-6" AGL (P) T-MOBILE RAD CENTER 41'-O" AGL (P) (3) STYLE 3C TMA'S & (E) (6) STYLE 4 TMA'S MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS (REMOVE (6) STYLE 4 TMA'S) (E) (3) T-MOBILE #TMBXX-6516-R2M ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON WOOD GLUELAM POLE TO BE REPLACED W/ (3) NEW COMMSCOPE #SBNHH-1 D65C ANTENNAS (TYP OF 1 PER SECTOR) ) OVERHEAD LINE 32.3' AGL (E) SECONDARY LINE OVERHEAD LINE NOTE: EXISTING LINE 1S SECONDARY DROP. NO HIGH VOLTAGE LINES ON POLE. PAINT NOTE: PROPOSED ANTENNAS/ATTACHMENTS & TMA'S TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING WOOD GLUELAM POLE. z-(E) T-MOBILE WOOD FENCED COMPOUND 4'-9" (E) 42%6" AGL WOOD GLUELAM POLE (E) (12) 7/8" COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN GLUELAM POLE PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 05....03, SCALE: NTS T - MMobile- INFORMATION: _PROJECT BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 51ST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FOR: CISSUED BUILDING PERMIT —REVISION HISTORY: auc NO. DATE: DESCRIPTION: SIT: //3�\ //'.,\ 5/9/2015 REV. PER 1-A Bit /A' 51/2D15 REV. PER REDLINES BJT 3/31/2015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW FAIT —PLANS PREPARED BY- B. J. THOMAS, P-E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 DRAWN BY: CHK. BY: JL BJ —LICENSURE: �" r'V '` 19115 —JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL- DRAWING TITL SITE ELEVATION DRAWING NUMBER: A-2 NSN RADIO MODULE FOR LTE 700 PROPERTY VALUE HEIGHT 15.75" WIDTH 15.75" DEPTH 5.9INCHES WEIGHT 59.52 LBS FRLB DETAIL SCALE: NTS PIPE TO PIPE CLAMP SET (SITEPRO #UPC2) NOTES: FITS PIPES 1-1/2" TO 3-1/2". CLAMP THICKNESS 1/4", 1/2" x 8" THREADED RODS. (KIT INLUDES 2 OF THE CLAMP SET) PIPE TO PIPE CLAMP DETAIL SCALE: NTS PARTS LIST ITEM # QUANTITY PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 2 601257 ANGLE ARM 2 2 601256 MOUNTING CLAMP 3 2 601235-1 BRACKET 4 2 601235-2 BRACKET 5 1 601258 LABEL, ANGLE 6 4 600679-3 SPACER TUBE 7 14 100525-24 ME FLAT WASHER (STAINLESS STEEL) 8 2 600419-8 M8x1.25x25mm LARGE CARRIAGE BOLT (STAINLESS STEEL) 9 6 6/1/7395 M8 LOCK WASHER (STAINLESS STEEL) 10 4 600419-10 M8x1.25x110mm LARGE HEX HEAD SCREW (STAINLESS STEEL) 11 6 204001-15 M8x1.25 HEX NUT (STAINLESS STEEL) 12 2 225244 CLAMP PLATE 13 8 600419-24 LARGE LOCK WASHER (STAINLESS STEEL) 14 8 204001-21 M12x1.75 HEX NUT (STAINLESS STEEL) 15 4 600419-12 M12x1.75x150mm LARGE CARRIAGE BOLT (STAINLESS STEEL) 17 1 601584 MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE GREASE ANTENNA BRACKET ATTACHMENT DETAIL SCALE: NTS INDOOR /OUTDOOR - GROUND SOLUTION: WITH OVERHEAD DC & OVERHEAD FIBER. QC 0 0 0 0 0 3 FRLB FRLS INDIV. FIBER AND POWER SUPPORT USE HG•5MM-12 AND 1/2" 14C1 ILK RI OCKS 1!2' CONDUIT FROM 1•BOX TO FRLB ANTENNA ANTENNA ATTACHMENT DETAIL FOLLOW EXISTING. JUMPER PATH SUPPORT FIBER CABLES WITH FA-064124-SIH EVERY 3' CUT BOOT FOR DC CABLE TO RFCIFVF 1/2" CONDUIT AND SEAL WITH 1" HEAT•SHRINK 6" 1-BOX HOUSES #10AWG DC CABLE 1- CONDUIT MEDIUM FOR #10AWG CABLE (2) PER FLRR SCALE: NTS GROUND SOLUTION DC & FIBER DETAIL SCALE: NTS Z,sat? 9 T --Mobile- INFORMATION: -PROJECT BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 51ST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FOR: [-ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT -REVISION HISTORY: c$IIL NO. DATE: DESCRIPTION: ■Y: //3�\ /////2\\ 5N2015 REV. PER 1-A BJT �/ 5212D15 REV. PER REDLINES BJT 1 \\ 3/31/2015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW Bit =PLANS PREPARED BY. B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 8OTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851.1106 -DRAWN BY. CHIC. BY: JL BJ -LICENSURE: t -; `Aa519115 B =JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL - DRAWING TITLE: GENERAL DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER. A-3 (P) MECHANICAL CONNECTION (E) AGB MOUNTED NEAR ANTENNAS BOND (P) ANTENNAS TO (E) AGB (E) MGB MOUNTED NEAR BTS CABINETS (P) MECHANICAL CONNECTION BOND (P) FRLB TO (E) MGB_ 000 MGB (P) MECHANICAL CONNECTION ELECTRICAL GROUNDING PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 1/2" = 1' 11x17 SCALE: 1/4" = 1' GROUNDING NOTES: 1. GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY WITH LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. 2. MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS FOR GROUND CONDUCTOR IS 8". 3. NO SPLICES PERMITTED IN GROUND CONDUCTORS. 4. ALL GROUNDING CONNECTORS TO BE CLEAN AND FREE OF PAINT AT THEIR MATING SURFACES AND INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. USE PENETROX OR EQUIVALENT ANTIOXIDANT GREASE. 5. ALL GROUND BAR CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE 2 HOLE LUG COMPRESSION TYPE. STACKED CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. BACK TO BACK CONNECTIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE GROUND BAR WILL BE PERMITTED. 6. ENSURE ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTORS ARE TORQUED TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFIED VALUES. 7. MULTIPLE BONDS ON GROUND RODS TO BE SEPARATED BY ATLEAST 6". 8. MAXIMUM RESISTANCE OF THE COMPLETED GROUND SYSTEM SHALL NOT EXCEED A RESISTANCE OF 5 OHMS TO EARTH. 9. GROUND WIRES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED THROUGH HOLES IN ANY METAL OBJECTS OR SUPPORTS; TO PRECLUDE ESTABLISHING A "CHOKE" POINT. 10. GROUND BARS SHALL NOT BE FIELD MODIFIED. 11. GROUND RING BURIAL DEPTH SHALL BE 30". 12. A CERTIFIED CONTRACTOR WILL MAKE ALL MEASUREMENTS REQUIRED TO TEST THE GROUNDING SYSTEM USING A MEGGER OR EQUIVALENT. THE ACCEPTABLE RESISTANCE MEASURED FOR THE GROUNDING SYSTEM WILL NOT EXCEED 5 OHMS RESISTANCE. THREE DISTANCES SHALL BE USED: 1 AT 100 FEET, 1 AT 70 FEET, AND 1 AT 35 FEET. THESE DISTANCES ARE SUBJECT TO A SITE BY SITE BASIS. T-MOBILE-WTS SHALL BE GIVEN 24 HOURS NOTICE. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH GROUND TESTING WILL BE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. SYMBOL LEGEND: MGB Tr MASTER GROUND BAR AGB Tr ACCESSORY GROUND BAR ■ CADWELD • MECHANICAL CONNECTION • COPPER GROUND ROD 0 GROUND INSPECTION WELL EXPOSED WIRING UNDERGROUND WIRING T--Mob ile- -PROJECT INFORMATION. BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 SIST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 —ISSUED FOR: CBUILDING PERMIT —REVISION HISTORY. INK Na DATE: D[sU11wnON: BY: /^3\\ ////2\ 5/912015 REV. PER 1-A BJT \ // 5/2/2015 REV. PER REDLINES BJT \' 3'3112015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT —PLANS PREPARED BY B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 8OTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 —DRAWN BY: CHIC. BY. JL BJ .—LICENSURE: R "= 519(15 =JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL —DRAWING TITLE. ELECTRICAL GROUNDING PLAN DRAWING NUMBER: E-1 TYPE TA TYPE VN TYPE NC TYPE SS P 41 1111 TYPE W TYPE VS TYPE VB TYPE PT 4411 TYPE GT TYPE GY TYPE GR TYPE GL TYPICAL CADWELD CONNECTIONS N.T.S. HARGER GROUNDING BAR #GB14824 (OR EQUAL) WITH HOLE PATTERN, STANDOFF INSULATORS AND MOUNTING BRACKETS AS SHOWN #2 GREEN INSULATED COPPER WIRE TO AGB AT TOP OF POLE COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS WITH LONG BARREL COMPRESSION LUGS, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. - = CADWELD TYPICAL MGB HARGER GROUNDING BAR #GBI14412G OR EQUAL ANTENNA MOUNT GROUND COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS #2SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE TO GROUND RING - PROVIDE (2) PER MGB GROUND BAR DETAILS N.T.S. #2 GREEN INSULATED COPPER WIRE TO MGB AT BOTTOM OF POLE ENO TYPICAL AGB Lis'-oo34 IT • -Mobile- PROJECTINFORNATION. -- BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 MST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 ISSUED FOR: CBUILDING PERMIT -REVISION HISTORY: CNK. NO. OAT@ DESCRIPTION: BY: //3�\ 5/92015 REV. PER 1-A BJT ////2\ 522015 REV. PER REDLINES BIT / \' 3131/2015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW B T -PLA`NS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 -DRAWN BY: CHIC. BY: JL BJ LLICENSURE: °` :`,-- B� .L' -/. ,5 'a, 519(I5 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL: =DRAWING TITLE: ELECTRICAL GROUNDING DETAILS -DRAWING NUMBER: E-2 SITE LOADING CHART SECTOR COLOR ANTENNA MODEL # VENDOR AZIMUTH (TN) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT ELECTRICAL DOWNTILT RADIATION CENTER ALPHA RED SBNHH-1D65C COMMSCOPE 0° 0° 5° 41'-0"AGL BETA GREEN SBNHH-1D65C COMMSCOPE 90° 0° 2° 41'-0"AGL GAMMA BLUE SBNHH-1D65C COMMSCOPE 170° 0° 2° 41'-0"AGL NOTE: 1. ALL COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTIONS TO BE WEATHER PROOFED. 2. CONTRACTOR TO DIP CABLES AND JUMPERS WHERE NECESSARY. 3. TAGGING: • ALL COAXIAL CABLES TO BE MARKED WITH COLOR CODED TAPE TO INDICATE THE ANTENNA SECTOR. • COLORED ELECTRICAL TAPE SHALL MARK EACH END OF CABLE AND EACH END OFJUMPERS AS CLOSE TO EACH END AS POSSIBLE. (NOT TO INTERFERE WITH WEATHERPROOFING.) 4. COAXIAL CABLE SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE CABLE SUPPORT EVERY 3'-0" ON CENTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY SUPPORTS AS REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. 5. VERTICAL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE TAPED FROM THE BOTTOM UP SO OVERLAP MOVES WATER AWAY FROM CONNECTION. (SEE STEP 4.) 6. PROVIDE HEAT SHRINK IN PLACE OF TAPE FOR QUAD POLES AND TMA'S. HEAT SHRINK SHALL BE "CANUSA" WITH ADHESIVE. CONNECTORS (TYP) STEP 1 BUTYL TAPE (ALSO KNOWN AS MASTIC, TAFFY TAPE) ELECTRICAL TAPE (1 LAYER) 1„ff -\ 1" tf 2" Ii r_--IN.�,41--t ri r-- ram'-- j I I J_I --i---�--{J--�isL--�j-- STEP 2 STEP 3 1 COAXIAL CABLE WEATHERPROOFING 0 COMMSCOPE TWIN STYLE SC TMA MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS: PART" LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH WEIGHT TMAT1921678-21A 9.09' 8 69' 4.09' 17.6 LBS CONNECT UC. MOUNTING CONNECTOR PART NAME TYPE RP 7-16 DIN FEMALE TWIN DPI F>;FDAWS/PCS TMA ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS: FREQUENCY FREQUENCY POWER HANDLING AWS 1710 -1755 NH. PCS1850-1910 MHz 7-30 Vdc 4.97" * t_ 5.83" O 0 O 0 4.48" COMMSCOPE TWIN DIPLEXER MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS: PARTY LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH WEIGHT E15V95P46 8.B8' 4 97' 4.48' 10.1 LBS CONNECTORS MOUNTING CONNECTOR PART NAME TYPE RP 7-16 DON FEMALE COX723AT-DS TWIN DIPLEXER ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS: FREQUENCY FREQUENCY MAX POWER AWS 1710- 2360 MHz LTE696- 89484818 7 - 30Vdc ELECTRICAL TAPE: 3 LAYERS WITH 2" TAPE AND 3 LAYERS IN 3/4" TAPE (ALL WITH MINIMUM 50% OVERLAP). ALL TAPE ENDS SHALL BE CUT (DO NOT STRETCH). COAT WITH 3M SCOTCHKOTE SPRAY SEALER = SCALE: NTS r- 4" t r- r-- STEP 4 I 1 I ANTENNA AND COAX GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL ANTENNA AND COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE TO BE FURNISHED BY T-MOBILE AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 2. COAX COLOR CODING: ANTENNAS TO BE NUMBERED IN A CLOCKWISE MANNER FROM TRUE NORTH AND COLOR CODED AS FOLLOWS: 3. THE ABOVE COAX COLOR CODING APPLIES TO SECTORIZED SITES. FOR OMNI SITES, USE THE ATO, BTO, & GTO COLOR CODES ONLY. 4. COAX SHALL BE TAGGED WITH COLOR CODING AT (2) PLACES USING 1" WIDE WEATHER PROOF COLORED VINYL TAPE AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: #1 - AT ANTENNA CONNECTION #2 - AT ENTRY TO EQUIPMENT CABINET 5. RUN COAXIAL CABLE WITH MINIMUM 12" SLACK & 12" FROM EDGE OF EQUIPMENT CABINETS, ACROSS WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE (IF APPLICABLE), UP TO TOWER LEG (IF APPLICABLE), & DISTRIBUTE TO EACH ANTENNA DEVICE. FURNISH AND INSTALL A MINIMUM OF (3) GROUND KITS PER COAXIAL CABLE ACCORDING TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. VERIFY NUMBER OF ANTENNAS, CABLE, & CABLE DIAMETER WITH PROJECT MANAGER. 11.9" 9' 96' IN • • COMMSCOPE ANTENNA DATA MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS PART NUMBER HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH WEIGHT SBNHH-1 D65C 96 in 11.9 in 7.1 in 49.61bs CONNECTORS STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE (6) 7-16 DIN INCLUDED ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS FREQUENCY POLARIZATION GAIN AZIMUTH B.W. 1710-2360 MHz t45° 17.7-18.5 dBi 64° t 6 VSWR MAX INPUT POWER ELEVATION B.W. <1.5:1 350 WATTS 5.0° t 0.7° T • -Mob ile- —PROJECT INFORMATION: BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 SIST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 ISSUED F BUILDING PERMIT REVISION HISTORY. CHIC NO. DAM DESCRIPTION: BT. A5/9/2015 REV. PER 1-A BJT //' 522015 REV. PER REDLINES BJT / \` 3/31/2015 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT PREPARED BY: —PLANS B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 8OTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 —DRAWN BY: CHI. BY: JL BJ —LICENSURE: le.), ri • , `4.5191I5 1 l - —JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL - DRAWING TITLE' RF DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER: RF.1 ESMB GSM Tower Ground PCS LAVVS/1 LA1AStirl rDPR Beta Ww Sector SwtorJ 0.0.0.•0DO.O• MOM r2 C2 l� 0. 0. 0.•O a 0.0• ` PCS sleiaivesamENLCIZIM FSME UMTS AWS Lowkden r( Ao SSG Hexport 700/AWS/ PCS au RSA Welof F5A.. seta S:c)S FRIA Gamma j fewer See Support cb FSIN LIE A Configuration 703E_GDSh (FRLB Ground diplexed with a Hexport for 700/UMTS AWS/GSM) LTE controls all RET on Hex antenna Tower Legend LTE 700 LTE AWS GSM PCS UMTS PCS GSM & UMTS AWS UMTS New Equipment (Upgraded 1 equipment I/ Reconfigured equipment MAMMA Tatttadyl.wn Ott i —173-1 tFEti �Is� M1L�IJWW��N "� _1_1 u.._ f N 31 005 _&,3121fi FRLB DeOret Gomm Sectors LDS-oQ3i T. --Mobile- =PROJECT INFORMATION. BEACON & BANGOR/SCL SE03556D 10405 S1ST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98178 FOR [—ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT HISTORY: —REVISION cMK NO. DAM DESCRIPTION: EN f/3�\ /////.�\\ 5I92S15 REV. PER 1-A BJT !/,\� SEW 2015 REV. PER REDLINES BJT S3V1815 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT =IPLA\NS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 BY: CHK. BY: DRAWN JL BJ LLICENSURE: `J '�`Se519(I5 .5 ,.' , teil,...._ =JURISDIC ZONAL APPROVAL =DRAWING TITLE RF DETAILS —DRAWING NUMBER. RF-2