The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit PL15-0047 - JAKE CARPENTER - ZAYO / SEPA CHECKLISTS E PA CHECKLIST Parent Project: PL15-0047 ISSUED DNS This File: E15-0012 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E15-0012 Applied: October 14, 2015 Issue Date: November 30, 2015 Applicant: Robert Thoman, Zayo Group Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: The current proposal is to install aerial strand and fiber cable crossing over the Green River and along 56th Ave S & Interurban Ave S within 200' of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The new cables will be placed on existing utility poles adjacent to existing cables. 56th Ave S and Interurban Ave S, Tukwila, WA N/A (closest to parcel #2172000160) This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non - significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. for inspection at Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188. The project planner is Minnie Dhaliwal, who may be contacted at (206) 431-3685 for further information. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by December 14, 2015. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Jack P e, Responsible Official City of ukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 hal .00) Date The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) Cc: Robert Thoman, Zayo Group State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax 206-431-3665 City ai J u F'uuiea Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Valerie Lonneman, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Application X Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 30 day of November, 2015 Project Name: Zayo Project Number: E15-0012 (SEPA) Associated File Number (s): PL15-0047 Mailing requested by: Valerie Lonneman 7 Mailer's signature: W:\USERS\VALERIE\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC King County Assessor's Office, 500 4tb Ave Rm. 709A Seattle, WA 98104 Department of Ecology, sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov Jake Carpenter, applicant fake@mgctechnical.com Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Tribe KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us W:\USERS\VALERIE\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC f '\ City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No: E15-0012 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The current proposal is to strand and lash fiber cables along 56th Ave S over the Green River (56th Ave S & Interurban Ave S—nearest parcel #2172000160) II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Zayo — SEA20 — Green River Crossing Applicant: Jake Carpenter, MGC Technical Consulting (obo Robert Thoman, Zayo Group) Location: 8521 154th Ave NE, Redmond, WA 98052 Zoning: Multiple (C/LI and LDR) Comprehensive Plan Designation: Multiple (C/LI and LDR) The following information was considered as part of review of this application. 1. ESA Screening Checklist and SEPA Checklist dated 9/28/15 and 9/29/15. 2. Site Plan, Cross -Section and Drain Details, Details, prepared by MGC and Zayo Group. NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Valerie Lonneman, Assistant Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, by phone at 206-433-7140. III. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 The applicant proposes to install aerial strand and fiber cable crossing over the Green River and along 56th Ave S & Interurban Ave S. The new cables will be placed on existing utility poles adjacent to existing cables. The project site is within the 200 foot shoreline jurisdiction of the Green River and within the 100 foot river buffer. Aerial will occur water ward of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Installation will be conducted using one bucket truck on either side of the river. The buckets will be erected towards the center of the river allowing installers to hand off the aerial strand and fiber cables. The cables will be attached to existing poles on either side of the river. Tarps will be placed inside of the buckets to ensure that anything dropped does not enter the river. There is no expected maintenance on the strand or fiber cable. IV. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant' s response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1-4—Concur with checklist. 5—The construction will follow issuance of SEPA determination and after obtaining all required permits from the City of Tukwila or other agencies. 6-8—Concur with checklist. 9—Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is not required; project valuation is less than $6,416. 10—Concur with checklist. 12—The project site lies within the Urban Conservancy Shoreline and Shoreline Residential Environmental Designations (no levee). The project is also within the FEMA 100 year floodway. The project vicinity contains areas sloping between 15% and 40% and underlain by permeable soils and engineered fill. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a—h—Concur with checklist. VL Page 2 of 4 11/30/2015 W:\Users\Valerie\SEPA\E15-0012 Staff Report 2. Air: a-c—Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a(1)—c(1)—Concur with checklist. c(2)— Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction debris enters river. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. d—Concur with checklist. 4. Plants: a—d—Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a-b—Concur with checklist. c—This area is part of the Pacific Flyway. A primary corridor for migratory bird species. d—Concur with checklist 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a-c—Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a—b(1)—Concur with checklist. b(2)-(3)—The project shall be subject to the City's noise ordinance and any construction related noise shall be subject the city's noise ordinance. Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts, associated with the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a—f—Concur with checklist. g—Concur with checklist. The site is in an un-leveed portion of the river. h— The project is also within the FEMA 100 year floodway. The site contains areas sloping between 15% and 40% and underlain by permeable soils and engineered fill. i-1—Concur with checklist. 9. Housing: a-c—Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a-c—Concur with checklist. 11. Light and Glare: VL Page 3 of 4 11/30/2015 W:\Users\Valerie\SEPA\E15-0012 Staff Report a-d—Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a-c—Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a-b—Concur with checklist. c—Applicant will comply with all local, state, and federal laws in the case that archaeological or paleontological artifacts are encountered. 14. Transportation: a-g—Concur with checklist. 15. Public Services: a-b—Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a-b—Concur with checklist. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS Notice was sent to property owners and tenants within 500' of the site and agencies with jurisdiction. One comment from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe was received regarding tribal access to fishing sites along the river. A response was sent to the tribal representative indicating that the work will take place approximately four months from the end of November (April 1, 2016) and shall only take one day of work, with no ongoing maintenance expected. VI. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC 197-11-340, a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued for this project. This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above "Final Staff Evaluation for Application No. E 15-0012", and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by city of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Prepared by: Valerie Lonneman, Assistant Planner Date: November 30, 2015 VL Page 4 of 4 11/30/2015 W:\Users\Valerie\SEPA\E15-0012. Staff Report • 0400 TO: I❑I Building City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RECEIVE) OCTT 22 2015 TUKWIIA PUBLIC WORKS File Number E15-0012 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM I' Public Works Planning 1❑1 Fire Dept. U Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: ZAYO — SEA20 — Green River Crossing Address: 56th Ave S (Foster Bridge) & Interurban Ave S Date transmitted: 10/26/15 Response requested by: 10/9/15 Staff coordinator: Valerie Lonneman Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) (566 4rr, iL t ?Ur" it c 0_ 0414.6 CO/41 Plan check date: f Comments Update date: 1 1/1 / f 5 prepared by: G �'I'\ MEMORANDUM www.tukwila@tukwilawa.gov Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Valerie Lonneman, Assistant Planner c/dn FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer David.McPherson@TukwilaWA.gov DATE: November 13, 2015 SUBJECT: Zayo — SEA20 - Green River Crossing 56th Ave. South (Foster Bridge) & Interurban Ave. South SEPA Public Works Review Comments. SEPA — E15-0012 The environmental checklist should be revised to reflect the following comments: B. Environmental Elements 5. Animals c. Yes — This area is part of the Pacific Flyway. A primary corridor for migratory bird species. Miscellaneous Comment Future Public Works permit will require an Undergrounding Waiver signed w/Notary by Zayo. Zayo to pay cost of recording document at King County Recorder's Office. Page 1 of 1 0400 r_ 1 TO: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E15-0012 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM LN' ilding � A Planning Public Works In Fire Dept. 101 Police Dept. LI Parks/Rec Project: ZAYO - SEA20 - Green River Crossing Address: 56th Ave S (Foster Bridge) & Interurban Ave S Date transmitted: 10/26/15 Response requested by: 10/9/15 Staff coordinator: Valerie Lonneman Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted devellopment regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Plan check date: /g 7- Comments prepared by: Update date: / 1 , ,„, ,, i eitg o f J u;P1wi&a Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Valerie Lonneman, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: X Notice of Application Notice of Decision Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Shoreline Mgmt Permit Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Official Notice Notice of Action Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 13 day of November, 2015 Project Name: Zayo - SEA20 - Green River Crossing Project Number: E 15-0012 (SEPA) Associated File Number (s): PL15-0047 Mailing requested by: Valerie Lonneman Mailer's signature: W:\USERS\VALERIE\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Notice Of Application —Environmental Checklist (SEPA) Zayo fiber optic cable Green River Crossing File #: E15-0012 SEPA Checklist Project Description: SEPA environmental re- view for a proposal to install aerial strand and fiber cable crossing over the Green River and along 56th Ave S & Interurban Ave S. The new cable will be placed on existing utility poles ad- jacent to existing cables. Project Applicant: Robert Thoman, Zayo Group Project Planner: Valerie Lonneman 206.433.7140 Valerie.Lonneman@TukwilaWA.gov Your written comments on the project are re- quested and can be delivered to 6300 South - center Blvd, Ste. 100, Tukwila, WA 98188. Com- ments must be received by 5:OOp.m. on Novem- ber 27, 2015. E15-0012 NOTIFICATION MAP 11\( civ 1 ILI TaxpayerFirstName Eddie L & Barbara A Dwight Jose & Jenifer Ashle Keith G Audrey J Jeffrey Sandra L Keith Richard C Jr Sandra D Son V & Ly Thi Luu Pham Hoang C & Luong Lanna S Phong Su Y Becky Ann Eva M Charlie P Jr & Helen C Serge A Rose Hatsumi Arie Mark Mary Jo Raleigh J Bryce K & Christine M Roy & Harriet Livng Tr William B & Wendy L Thang Quang & Phuong N N TaxpayerLastName Akers Boechler Castillo CITY OF SEATTLE--SCL Collingwood Davis Encke Finn Flick FOSTER APARTMENTS LLC Hanlon HIC I LLC Johnson KING COUNTY -TRANSIT KING ROBERT#15237 Lai Le Le Liao Mcguire Painter Penor PRATEJ II LLC PRATEJ LLC Ratov Reid Roeland Svendsen Thornton THORP PROPERTIES INC Tingley Tongue Toon Tran Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member TaxpayerAddress PO BOX 1048 13340 56TH AVE S 13355 56TH AVE S PO BOX 34023 13343 56TH AVE S 13341 56TH AVE S 4913 SW CANADA DR 13324 56TH AVE S 13325 56TH AVE S 495 LAKE LOUISE DR SW 13611 54TH AVE S PO BOX 700 5330 S 136TH ST 500 4TH AVE 7517 GREENWOOD AVE N 5110 S 136TH ST 13350 56TH AVE S 4102 SW AUSTIN ST 5319 S 136TH ST 2640 S 227TH PL 13526 53RD AVE SO 13351 56TH AVE S 13530 53RD AVE S 18506 NW MONTREAUX DR PO BOX 69212 16044 NE 26TH ST 13354 56TH AVE S 10212 SW 228TH ST 13328 56TH AVE S 26313 97TH AVE S 1402 LAKE TAPPS PKWY E # 104-509 100 ANDOVER PARK W STE 150 PMB 115 4665 S 160TH ST 13312 56TH AVE S 13319 56TH AVE S 13327 56TH AVE S TaxpayerCityState GRAHAM WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA LAKEWOOD WA TUKWILA WA MERCER ISLAND WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA DES MOINES WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA ISSAQUAH WA SEATTLE WA BELLEVUE WA TUKWILA WA VASHON WA TUKWILA WA KENT WA AUBURN WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA TaxpayerZip 98338 98178 98178 98124 98178 98178 98136 98178 98178 98498 98168 98040 98168 98004 98103 98168 98178 98136 98168 98198 98168 98178 98068 98072 98168 98008 98178 98070 98178 98030 98092 98188 98188 98178 98178 98178 Gerald A Jr & Jane Mary Ellen Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member Tukwila Community Member TUKWILA INTERURBAN INVEST WA STATE DOT Wheaton Whitehead 13331 56TH AVE S 13336 56TH AVE S 13344 56TH AVE S 13347 56TH AVE S 13359 56TH AVE S 13360 56TH AVE S 13400 INTERURBAN AVE S 13435 INTERURBAN AVE S 13500 INTERURBAN AVE S 13525 52ND AVE S 13533 52ND AVE S 13537 52ND AVE S 13900 INTERURBAN AVE S 5120 S 136TH ST 5313 S 136TH ST 5331 S 136TH ST 5333 S 136TH ST 5335 S 136TH ST PO BOX 88636 PO BOX 330310 13361 56TH AVE S 13335 56TH AVE S Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA Tukwila, WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA 98178 98178 98178 98178 98178 98178 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98168 98188 98133 98178 98168 SELECT AGENCY FEDERAL AGENCIES x US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS FEDERAL HIGHWAYADMIN FEDERAL TRANSIT ADM IN DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR US E.P.A. US DEPT OF H.U.D NAT'L MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WA STATE AGENCIES x OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY WSDOT NW REGION x DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR WA STATE COMMUNITY DEV x WA FISHERIES & WILDLIFE WASH DEPT OF SOCIAL/HEALTH X DEPT OF ECOLOGY x WA DEPT OF ECOLOGY x WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY AGENCIES KC BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT # 11 FIRE DISTRICT # 2 KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT x KC PARKS & RECREATION x KC ASSESSOR'S OFFICE KC HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE x KC DEV & ENVIRON SERVICES x KC METRO TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL x KC DEPARTMENT OF NAT'L RESOURCES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES KC LIBRARY SYSTEM FOSTER LIBRARY RENTON LIBRARY KENT LIBRARY SEATTLE LIBRARY WESTFIELD MALL LIBRARY TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES x QWEST COMMUNICATIONS X SEATTLE CITY LIGHT x PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMCAST BP OLYMPIC PIPELINE x VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 x WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON BRYN MAW R-LAKERIDGE x SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE ALLIED WASTE WASTE MANAGEMENT CITY AGENCIES CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT JACKSON FEDERAL BLDG FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE WA STATE HABITAT BRANCH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LEGISLATIVE BUILDING NW REGIONAL OFFICE SEPA REVIEW ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT CITY OF SEATTLE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING -OAP ACCOUNTING DIVISION PERMITS SEPA INFO CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SEPA Review / Joe Wolf ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY DIV WATER DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS WATER/SEWER DISTRICT JALAINE MADURA, SEPA MICHAEL GAGLIARDO DENNIS MANES DEPARTMENT ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP EMAIL Contact Name 4735E MARGINAL WY S 7115 CAPITOL WAY, STE 501 915 2nd AVE, STE 3142 911 NE llth AVE 1200 6th AVE 909 1st AVE, STE 200 510 DESMOND DR SE, STE 103 PO BOX 48343 PO BOX 330310, MS 240 PO 47015 PO BOX 40002 PO BOX 48300 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD PO BOX 1788 3190 160th AVE SE PO BOX 47703 PO BOX 40117 PO BOX 94729 400 YESLER WAY#402 1243 SW 112th 15100 8th AVE SW 201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-NR-0505 2015 JACKSON ST., STE 700 500 4th AVE, RM# 709A 401 FIFTH AVE, STE 1100 PO BOX 1209 35030 SE Douglas Street, Ste 210 201 5 JACKSON ST., MS KSC-TR-0431 2015 JACKSON ST., STE 600 960 NEWPORT WAY NW 4060 S 144th STREET 100 MILL AVE 5 212 2nd AVE N 1000 4th AVE 1386 SOUTHCENTER MALL 4640 S 144th STREET 15675 AMBAUM BLVD SW PO BOX 34165 MS 22-332 300 SW 7TH STREET 23315 66th AVE 5 PO BOX 34023 PO BOX 90868 23828 30th AVE S PO BOX 34019 12645 STONE AVE N 2319 LIND AVENUE SW PO BOX 69550 12606 1st AVE S PO BOX 68147 1055 S GRADY WAY 6723 5 124th Street PO BOX 34018 11400 SE 8th Street, Suite 440 2201.0 76tb AVE S 8111-1st AVE 5 SEATTLE OLYMPIA SEATTLE PORTLAND SEATTLE SEATTLE LACEY OLYMPIA SEATTLE OLYMPIA OLYMPIA OLYMPIA MILL CREEK OLYMPIA BELLEVUE OLYMPIA LACEY SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE BURIEN SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SNOQUALMIE SEATTLE SEATTLE ISSAQUAH TUKWILA RENTON KENT SEATTLE TUKWILA TUKWILA BURIEN SEATTLE RENTON KENT SEATTLE BELLEVUE KENT SEATTLE SEATTLE RENTON SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE RENTON SEATTLE SEATTLE BELLEVUE KENT SEATTLE WA WA WA OR WA WA WA 98124 98501 98174 97232 98101 98104 98503 WA 98504 GretehvnkaehlerLiHP.wa.ggv WA 98133 WA 98504 WA 98504 WA 98504 WA 98012 Lar.Fisheradfw.waiov WA 98504 WA 98008 WA 98504 seaaunit ery.wa.zo., WA 98504 WA 98104 WA 98104 WA 98146 WA 98166 WA 98104 WA 98104 WA 98104 CI nstie Most !iakil jcounty_yi ov WA 98104 WA 98111 WA 98065 WA 98104 WA 98104 WA 98027 WA 98168 WA 98055 WA 98032 WA 98104 WA 98188 WA 98168 WA 98166 WA 98124 WA 98055 WA 98032 WA 98124 WA 98009 WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA WA 98032 98124 98133 98055 98168 98168 98168 98055 98178 98124 98004 I9a2ardo0 casca4nwaler.orq 98032 98108 Gretchen Kaehler Larry Fisher 10mb max Christie Most MICHAEL GAGLIARDO KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON CITY OF SEATAC CITY OF BURIEN x CITY OF SEATTLE STRATEGIC PLANNING OTHER LOCAL AGENOES PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL KC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE X MUCKLESHOOT Cultural Resources Program X MUCKLESHOOT Fisheries Program X MUCKLESHOOT Wildlife Program X DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE x PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY x SOUND TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL x DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN UP COALITION x WA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL x PEOPLE FOR PUGET SOUND FUTUREWISE MEDIA SEATTLE TIMES SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL HIGHLINE TIMES OTHER -OWNER -ETC PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEPA CONTROL PLANNING & DEVEL SEATTLE 30. CONVENTION & VISITORS Laura Murphy Karen Walter Mike Middleton SEPA REVIEW UNION STATION 220 FOURTH AVE 5 1055 5 GRADY WAY 4800 5 188th STREET 415 SW 150th PO BOX 34019 600 4th AVE #300 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 14220 Interurban Ave 5 # 134 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 39015 172nd AVE SE 4705 W MARGINAL WAY SW 1904 3rd AVENUE, STE 105 401 SJACKSON STREET 210 5 Hudson Street, Ste 332 1402 THIRD AVE, STE# 1400 1402 - 3rd Ave, Ste 1400 816 SECOND AVENUE, STE 200 PO BOX 70 600 S WASHINGTON 133 SW 153rd STREET KENT WA 98032 RENTON WA 98055 SEATAC WA 98188 BURIEN WA 98166 SEATTLE WA 98124 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA Tok' "n WA AUBURN WA AUBURN WA AUBURN WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA 98104 y-P-v.rti �.!py�n..p•rc ory 9v_168 98092 Im.,re.murphy nnnx!o. hoot nsn.u• 98092 Karrn.Wstter4]muchlethoot nsn.u•. 98092 nnkv I7-ktdl .lout: mt,ckleshoot n•.n us 98106 98101 98104 98134 98101 98101 98104 SEATTLE WA 98111 KENT WA 98032 BURIEN WA 98166 Yorik Stevens-Wajda kn•d•.n+gc9-t fthonn_: 15tr0 my Liz Underwood-bultmann Laura Murphy Karen Walter Mike Middleteon Valerie Lonneman From: Valerie Lonneman Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 11:42 AM To: 'Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.gov'; 'Larry.Fisher@dfw.wa.gov'; 'sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov'; 'Christie.Most@kingcounty.gov'; 'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'Karen.Walter@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'mike.middleton@muckleshoot.nsn.us' Cc: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: E15-0012 Notice of Application Attachments: E15-0012 Half Sheet Notice.pdf Please see the attached Notice of Application for the Zayo-SEA20-Green River Crossing SEPA application (E15-0012). Regards, Valerie Lonneman Assistant Planner, City of Tukwila 1630o Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila WA 98188 206.433.714o I Valerielonneman@TukwilaWA.gov Tukwila: The City of opportunity, the community of choice. 1 ♦� City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION October 26, 2015 Jake Carpenter MGC Technical Consulting 8521 154t Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 Jake @MGCTechnical.com Subject: ZAYO — SEA20 — Green River Crossing E15-0012 Dear Mr. Carpenter: Your application for a Special Permission permit to strand and leash a fiber cable along 56th Ave. S. over the Green River is considered complete on October 26, 2015. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at (206) 433-7140. Sincerely, Valerie Lonneman Assistant Planner W:\Users\Valerie\Letter of Completeness Page 1 of 1 10/26/2015 r rN SEPA Checklist STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ZAYO - SEA20 - GREEN RIVER CROSSING 2. Name of Applicant: ROBERT THOMAN 3. Date checklist prepared: 9/28/15 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 11/15/15 (AS SOON AS ALL PERMITS ARE RECEIVED) CRY CF Yuti+mo a `OCT 14 2015 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N/A 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.docx Page 1 \ Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. CITY OF TUKWILA - RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT CITY OF TUKWILA - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT DECISION DNR - AQUATIC EASEMENT 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. STRAND AND LASH (1) 144CT FIBER CABLE ALONG EXISTING SCL UTILITY POLES CROSSING THE GREEN RIVER & WITHIN 200' OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (OHWM). 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. CLOSEST PARCEL - 2172000160 (EAST RIVERTON GARDEN TRS 2ND PLAT BLOCK: PLAT LOT: 32) NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF 56TH AVE S (FOSTER BRIDGE) & INTERURBAN AVE S SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL & LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2Ol l.docx Page 2 \. SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth f a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: FLAT b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 45 DEGREES c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. NATIVE DIRT d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N/A e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A \\deptstore\City Common \Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 3 / \ / Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N/A g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. AUTOMOBILE ODORS FROM UTILITY TRUCK b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 4 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. GREEN RIVER 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. INSTALL AERIAL CABLE ACROSS THE GREEN RIVER. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l .docx Page 5 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. NO 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. SOME OF THE PROJECT IS ON THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. THE MAP CAN BE SEEN ON PAGE 2 WITH THE GENERAL NOTES. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. NO SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 6 f� r� ; Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): l . Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\depistore\City Common \Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l I.docx Page 7 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1 _ Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other — Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ Shrubs 1 Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NO IMPACTS ON ANY SPECIES - CHINOOK SALMON, BULL TROUT, BALD EAGLE, AND SONG BIRDS. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 8 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. CHINOOK SALMON, BULL TROUT, BALD EAGLE, AND SONG BIRDS. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A - FUEL WILL BE NEEDED FOR WORK VEHICLES. \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 9 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 10 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Noise l . What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N/A 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 10 - 15 MINUTES OF A UTILITY VEHICLE. WORK HOURS TBD BY CITY. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? NEIGHBOORHOOD / UTILITIES b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. N/A SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 11 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: c. Describe any structures on the site. EXISTING SEATTLE CITY LIGHT OWNED UTILITY POLES. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL & LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common \Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 12 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N/A i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A - EXISTING FIBER CABLES ALREADY EXIST OVER THE GREEN RIVER. SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 13 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? FIBER CABLE WILL BE APPROX 30' ABOVE THE BRIDGE GRADE b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? THIS NEW CABLE WILL BE PLACED NEAR EXISTING CABLES. MINIMAL VIEW OBSTRUCTION SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.docx Page 14 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A \\deptstore\City Common \Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 15 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N/A Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common \Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 16 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A - NO IMPACTS WILL BE MADE l4. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N/A b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YES - THERE IS A BUS STOP ON INTERURBAN AVE JUST NORTH OF 56TH AVE SOUTH c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\TerAKIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 17 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). N/A e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 1 TRIP TO PLACE THE SUPPORT STRAND & 1 TRIP TO PLACE THE FIBER STRAND. 1 DAY NEEDED. HOURS TBD BY CITY OF TUKWILA. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: TRAFFIC CONTROL APPROVED THROUGH PUBLIC WORKS 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO \\deptstore\City Common \ Teri \KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 18 r 1 f 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. ENSURE BUS STOP REMAINS OPEN & ACCESSABLE AT ALL TIMES. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. MULTIPLE CABLE/FIBER PROVIDERS AS WELL AS SCL POWER IS ON THE EXISTING POLES. SEPA Checklist Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 19 SEPA Checklist (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). C. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? N/A Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A Agency Comments \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.docx Page 20 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 21 SEPA Checklist Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? N/A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/A D. SIGNATURE Agency Comments Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decisio .107‘...... Signature: Date Submitted: 09/29/2015 \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 l.docx Page 22 l 1 COM TE APPLICATION C CKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-431-3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206-433-0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 'V 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. f/ 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist and Planned Action Criteria Checklist. V, 3. One set of all drawings submitted with the Planned Action reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17". tc 4. Application Fee: See Land Use Fee Schedule. y 5. Underlyingpermit application that triggers SEPA Review. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 6. Vicinity Map with site location. 7. Provide two copies of sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines for additional information. 8. Provide four (4) copies of any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". 7� City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist _/ City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 09/28/2015 Applicant Name: ZAYO GROUP (ROBERT THOMAN) Street Address: 22651 83RD AVE S City, State, Zip: KENT, WA 98032 Telephone: (360) 771-7377 DIRECTIONS: This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 2, read each question carefully, mark the appropriate "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. vise Am Pe °1:0 441° \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l 1.docx Page 1 C,ifi' of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - Continue to Question 1-1 (Page 3) 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-1 (Page 4) 3-0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18-15). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re -occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO — Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete \\deptstore\City Common\TeriVURBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 2 ll Cityy4Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B: Please answer each questiv ,below for projects that include grading,_,ceview each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 1-2 YES - Continue to Question 1-2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 1-3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. if your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I.docx Page 3 Oh, of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part C: Please review each quest►._ --below for projects that include clearing. deview each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2-1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-2 2-2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -breast -height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-3 YES - Continue to Question 2-3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2-5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 4 -1 Cit,n,'Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each questio. ,elow for projects that include work bet., _,the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3-1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3-2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3-3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross -sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross -sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l l.docx Page 5 C,)'? of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support sallnonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow/groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3-7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please mark the appropriate response. ✓ NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3-8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please mark the appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) \\deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.docx Page 6 t CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at (city), ("I /* (state), on /643/ (Print Naace)(3 $,�iu-.- 72 (3 t (Address)/266\ /3 ,5-- (Phone Number) J , 20 (Signature On this day personally appeared before me-VO GLU +(/V' tY 044. to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledgethat he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. isN SUBSCRIBED ji RN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 1 a DAY 0 r; .4-I , 20 ..``v4 HA8 A..../i ca E.:NOTAIty My Commission expires on Vats F0� wASN..... \\Deptstore\City Con ft f 1i - DECEMBERISEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan2011.Docx NOTA Y P residing at CITY uF TUKWILA Department of Community Developme_, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, RtO Telephone: (206) 431-3670 C a� Woo SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL 1%6 REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE: P-SEPA Planner: File Number: E Is -- I Application Complete Date: Project File Number: pL_ 15 - 0 oil-7 Application Incomplete Date: Other File Numbers: ,9 CU 15 - 013 9- NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: ZAYO - SEA20 - GREEN RIVER CROSSING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF WORK: STRAND & LASH FIBER CABLE ALONG 56TH AVE S OVER THE GREEN RIVER. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacani, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 56th Ave S (Foster Bridge) & Interurban Ave S LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). N/A DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner/applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: JAKE CARPENTER (MGC TECHNICAL CONSULTING) Address: 8521 154TH AVE NE REDMOND, WA 98052 Phone: (425) 305-1785 FAX: E-mail: JA MG T HNICAL.COM Signature: Date: 09/28/2015 \\Deptstore\City Common\Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan20l l.Docx CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at (city), (state), on , 20 (Print Name) (Address) (Phone Number) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires on \\Deptstore\City Common \Teri\KIRBY - DECEMBER\SEPA Environmental Review Application-Jan201 I.Docx ADDRESS: 13361 56TH AVE. TUKWILA WA, 98178-4632 PROJECT NAME: ZAYO - ATT - SEA-20 - GREEN RIVER CROSSING SITE LOCATION Know what's below. Call before you dig. CONTACTS ZAYO CONTACT: ROBERT THOMAN 22651 83RD AVE S KENT, WA 98032 C. 360.771.7377 ROBERT.THOMAN@ZAYO.COM BRYSON BAILY MGC TECHNICAL CONSULTING, INC. PO BOX 332 BOTHELL, WA 98041 C.206.799.3001 BRYSON@MGCTECHNICAL.COM SITE INDEX 1. COVER SHEET / SITB.LOCATION 2. LEGEND _ 3. GENERAL NOTES 4. PLAN VIEW 5. CROSS SECTION 6. TYPICALS - SCOPE OF WORK: STRAND AND LASH (1) 144F CABLE ALONG EXISTING SCL UTILITY POLES CROSSING THE GREEN RIVER & WITHIN 200' OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (OHWM). eM'coalE 3 AS —BUILT 2 REVISION # 1 9.19.2015 BB KM ORIGINAL NO. DATE ENG DESIGN DRAFTING COMMENT J o' cRouP7Eorffig) ZAYO ENGINEER: ROBERT THOMAN ENGINEERING FIRM: MGC TECHNICAL CONSTULTING, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: 3104 S IRVING ST SEATTLE, WA, 98144-3928 DRAWING NAME: SEA-20-AERIAL-01.dwg CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY SHEET: 1 OF 6 LINETYPES T 0 0 0 0 STM SYMBOL ASW BIP BSP CSW EOP EON FOC HDPE HH JB MH MP 0/S PVC RGS ROW STA. 01 L DESCRIPTION UG FIBER - EXISTING UG FIBER - PROPOSED AERIAL FIBER - EXISTING AERIAL FIBER - PROPOSED STRAND - EXISTING STRAND - PROPOSED CONDUIT - EXISTING CONDUIT - PROPOSED INNERDUCT - EXISTING INNERDUCT - PROPOSED GAS WATER TELEPHONE ELECTRIC SANITARY SEWER (SEW) STORM DRAIN FENCE GUARD RAIL CABLE TV STEAM OIL UNKNOWN UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY EDGE OF PAVEMENT ASPHALT SIDEWALK BLACK IRON PIPE BLACK STEEL PIPE CONCRETE SIDEWALK EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY FACE OF CURB HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HANDHOLE JUNCTION BOX MANHOLE MILE POST OFFSET POLY VINYL CHLORIDE RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL CONDUIT RIGHT OF WAY STATION i LEGEND RISER TELEPHONE POWER VAULT CATCH BASIN/INLET FIRE HYDRANT TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION GROUND/BOND STREET LIGHT TREE CULVERT WING WALL r—f BRIDGE O OWNER 0 OWNER ID HH- HH HANDHOLE OWNER HH- HANDHOLE OWNER MH- MANHOLE OWNER M H- 0 MANHOLE OWNER PB- PB PULLBOX OWNER PB- El PULLBOX OWNER MISC. UTILITY UTILITY POLE - EXISTING POLE - PROPOSED HANDHOLE - EXISTING HANDHOLE - PROPOSED MANHOLE - EXISTING MANHOLE - PROPOSED PULLBOX - EXISTING PULBOX - PROPOSED VAULT- V VAULT OWNER VAU V VAULT OWNER 0' co 0' 0 FDP NAM E SIZE LOCATION FDP NAM E SIZE LOCATION NAME STREET IH MANUFACTURER NAM E MANUFACTURER NAME #F IN: 0 OUT: 0 #F IN: 0 TAIL: 0 #F TAIL: OUT: 0 0 VAULT - EXISTING VAULT - PROPOSED AERIAL STORAGE - EXISTING AERIAL STORAGE - PROPOSED VAULT/BUILDING STORAGE - EXISTING VAULT/BUILDING STORAGE - PROPOSED POLE ANCHOR/DOWN GUY - EXISTING POLE ANCHOR/DOWN GUY - PROPOSED PROPOSED DOWN GUY ON EXISTING ANCHOR TERMINATION - EXISTING TERMINATION - PROPOSED BUILDING CALLOUT - PROPOSED SPLICE POINT - EXISTING SPLICE POINT - PROPOSED SEQUENTIAL CALLOUT SEQUENTIAL IN TAIL CALLOUT SEQUENTIAL TAIL OUT CALLOUT POLE NO N/A UTILITY1 0'-O" POLE NO N%A UTILITY1 1 0'-0" OCABLE FIBERS: FIBERS CABLE OWNER: OWNER CABLE LENGTH: LENGTH NOTES: OCABLE FIBERS: FIBERS CABLE OWNER: OWNER CABLE LENGTH: LENGTH NOTES: OCONDUIT OWNER: OWNER CONDUIT LENGTH: LENGTH CONDUIT QTY: CONDUITS CONDUIT SIZE: SIZE CONDUIT TYPE: TYPE INNER DUCT QTY: INNERDUCTS INNER DUCT SIZE: SIZE INNER DUCT TYPE: TYPE NOTES: OCONDUIT OWNER: OWNER CONDUIT LENGTH: LENGTH CONDUIT QTY: CONDUITS CONDUIT SIZE: SIZE CONDUIT TYPE: TYPE INNER DUCT QTY:INNERDUCTS INNER DUCT SIZE: SIZE INNER DUCT TYPE: TYPE NOTES: OSTRAND TYPE: TYPE STRAND LENGTH: LENGTH NOTES: OSTRAND TYPE: TYPE STRAND LENGTH: LENGTH NOTES: Know what's below. Call before you dig. POLE ATTACHMENT CALLOUT - EXISTING USE DYNAMIC PULL DOWN TO SELECT FROM 1 TO 6 ATTACHMENTS POLE ATTACHMENT CALLOUT - PROPOSED USE DYNAMIC PULL DOWN TO SELECT FROM 1 TO 6 ATTACHMENTS CABLE SPAN CALLOUT - EXISTING FOR USE ON PAPER SPACE (SHOWN AT 50X) CABLE SPAN CALLOUT - PROPOSED FOR USE ON PAPER SPACE (SHOWN AT 50X) CONDUIT CALLOUT - EXISTING FOR USE ON PAPER SPACE (SHOWN AT 50X) WITH OR WITHOUT INNER DUCT INFO CONDUIT CALLOUT - PROPOSED FOR USE ON PAPER SPACE (SHOWN AT 50X) WITH OR WITHOUT INNER DUCT INFO STRAND CALLOUT - EXISTING FOR USE ON PAPER SPACE (SHOWN AT 50X) STRAND CALLOUT - PROPOSED FOR USE ON PAPER SPACE (SHOWN AT 50X) 3 2 9.19.2015 8B NO. DATE ENG DESIGN KM DRAFTING AS —BUILT REVISION # 1 ORIGINAL COMMENT MGC� ZAYO ENGINEER: ROBERT THOMAN ENGINEERING FIRM: MGC TECHNICAL CONSTULTING, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: 3104 S IRVING ST SEATTLE, WA, 98144-3928 DRAWING NAME: SEA-20-AERIAL-01.dwg CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY SHEET: 2 OF 6 GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES: The locations of utilities shown on these drawing are only approximate. MGC TECHNICAL CONSULTING, INC. hereby disclaims any responsibility to third parties for the accuracy of this information. Persons working in the area covered by this drawing must contact the statewide Call -Before -You -Dig System to ascertain the location of underground utilities prior to performing any excavation. 1. ALL MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, AND CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED SITE WORK STANDARDS AND THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SET FORTH IN THE CITY OF SEATTLE REGULATIONS AND APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. WHERE THERE IS CONFLICT BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND THE SPECIFICATIONS, OR ANY APPLICABLE STANDARDS, THE HIGHER QUALITY STANDARD SHALL APPLY. ALL WORK WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W. OR EASEMENTS MAY REQUIRE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE INSPECTOR. INSPECTION SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGNEE OF PROJECT SPONSOR/OWNER. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE LOCAL UTILITY LOCATION CENTER AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PERTINENT LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS, ESPECIALLY AT THE CONNECTION POINTS AND AT POTENTIAL UTILITY CONFLICTS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FROM ALL APPLICABLE AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF SEATTLE INSPECTOR AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITY OR CONSTRUCTION ON ANY AND ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IF REQUIRED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COOPERATE WITH THE CITY OF SEATTLE AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WITH REGARD TO RELOCATIONS OR ADJUSTMENTS OF EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, TO ASSURE THAT THE WORK IS ACCOMPLISHED IN A TIMELY FASHION, AND WITH A MINIMUM DISRUPTION OF SERVICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL PARTIES AFFECTED BY ANY DISRUPTION OF ANY UTILITY SERVICE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ONE (1) SIGNED COPY OF THE APPROVED PLANS, ONE (1) COPY OF THE APPROPRIATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ONE (1) COPY OF ANY PERMITS AND EXTENSION AGREEMENTS NEEDED FOR THE JOB ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASPECTS OF SAFETY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: EXCAVATION, TRENCHING, SHORING, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND SECURITY. 7. IF, DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS, CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED BY THE CONTRACTOR, HIS SUBCONTRACTORS, OR OTHER AFFECTED PARTIES WHICH COULD INDICATE A SITUATION THAT IS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. 8. ALL REFERENCES TO ANY PUBLISHED STANDARDS SHALL REFER TO THE LATEST REVISION OF SAID STANDARD, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 9. FOR WORK AFFECTING PUBLIC ROADWAYS OR IF REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PHASING PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH M.U.T.C.D. FOR APPROVAL. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN OR AFFECTING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ANY AND ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY SAID PLANS. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE SHALL BE HELD WITH CITY OF SEATTLE. 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE INTENDED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS OR DESIGNATED TO BE PROVIDED, INSTALLED, CONSTRUCTED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. 11. PER AGENCY STANDARDS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING ROADWAYS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND DIRT TRACKED FROM THE SITE. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING RECORD INFORMATION ON A SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS KEPT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND AVAILABLE TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE INSPECTOR AT ALL TIMES. 13. DIMENSIONS FOR LAYOUT AND CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT TO BE SCALED FROM ANY DRAWING. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR CLARIFICATION AND NOTE ON THE RECORD DRAWINGS. 14. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (E.S.C.) MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL E.S.C. MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD REPAIR BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE ENTIRE DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED WITH HARD SURFACE OR LANDSCAPING. 15. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IS SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 16. ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, INCLUDING THE WARMING UP, REPAIR, ARRIVAL, DEPARTURE OR RUNNING OF TRUCKS, EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT SHALL GENERALLY BE LIMITED TO THE TIME PERIOD APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE. AERIAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE PERFORMED TO INDUSTRY ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS. 2. ALL NEW AERIAL (AND EXISTING) CABLE HTS OF ATTACHMENT TO BE DOCUMENTED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. 6.6 M STRAND TO BE USED WITH STANDARD 5/8" POLE LINK HARDWARE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BOND STRAND TO PWR MAIN WHERE APPLICABLE. 4. ALL ANCHORS TO BE USED WILL BE 3/4" SCREW TYPE. 5. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN AND FOLLOW ALL NESC ALONG WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL & REGIONAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES AND DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE AUTHORITIES AND OR THE CONSTRUCTION PRINTS IS TO BE VALIDATED WITH THE DESIGNER OR OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL PVC OR HDPE CONDUITS ARE TO BE PLUGGED WITH COMPRESSION STYLE PLUGS. ANY CONDUITS CONTAINING FIBER CABLES WILL REQUIRE SIMPLEX COMPRESSION PLUGS SEALING THE CONDUIT AROUND THE CABLE. 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN MAP Know what's below. CaII before you dig. 3 AS —BUILT 2 REVISION # 1 9.19.2015 BB KM ORIGINAL NO. DATE ENG DESIGN DRAFTING COMMENT MGC CONSNA..TINP NC ZAYO ENGINEER: ROBERTTHOMAN ENGINEERING FIRM: MGC TECHNICAL CONSTULTING, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: 3104 S IRVING ST SEATTLE, WA, 98144-3928 DRAWING NAME: SEA-20-AERIAL-01.dwg CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY SHEET: 3 OF 6 LEAVE 200' OHWM PLAN VIEW POLE NO 1407300 NEUTRAL 40'0" POWER RISER 38'4" SECONDARY DRIP 32'7" F/02 26'0" PHONE 26'0" SVC DROPS 24'11" COMM BOX TOP 24'1" ZAYO ATTACH 27'0" 202• POLE NO 140/280 NEUTRAL 38'10" POWER RISER 37'2" SECONDARY DRIP 34'9" CAN 25'2" F/02 24'4" SVC DROP 23'6" PHONE 23'3" ZAYO ATTACH 26'2" 122' INTERURBANAVE S POLE NO 1407283 NEUTRAL 40'0" CAN 25'0" PHONE 23'6" F/02 22'6" ZAYO ATTACH 26'0" ENTER 200' OHWM 42' r 34' A S6THAVE S A POLE NO 1407459 NEUTRAL 40'0" CAN 25'0" PHONE 23'1" F/02 21'6" SVC DROPS 17'10" ZAYO ATTACH 26'0" POLE NO 1390905 NEUTRAL 40'0" CATV 33'6" PHONE 32'3" ZAYO ATTACH 34'6" POLE NO 1407460 NEUTRAL 40'0" CAN N 24'0" CATV 23'3" F/02 21'10" PHONE N 21'10" PHONE 21'2" COMM BOX TOP 20'5" ZAYO ATTACH 25'0", Know what's below. CaII before you dig. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1O PROPOSED STRAND AND LASH (1) 144F CABLE ALONG EXISTING SCL UTILITY POLES. PROPOSED STRAND AND LASH (1) 144F CABLE ALONG EXISTING SCL UTILITY POLES. CONTRACTOR TO USE 10M STRAND AND INSTALL (1) 1 1/4" INNERDUCT ACROSS 1-5. e,son 3 2 1 9.19.2015 BB KM NO. DATE ENG DESIGN DRAFTING GROUP AS —BUILT REVISION # 1 ORIGINAL COMMENT ZAYO ENGINEER: ROBERT THOMAN ENGINEERING FIRM: MGC TECHNICAL CONSTULTING, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: 3104 S IRVING ST 0 50' 100' SEATTLE, WA, 98144-3928 DRAWING NAME: SEA-20-AERIAL-02.awg SCALE: 1"=100' CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY SHEET: 4 OF 6 SCL POLE Mt CROSS SECTION AERIAL STRAND & FIBER CABLE-LI 30' s« +r VC' • ;« GREEN RIVER SECTION 'A' — CROSS SECTION CD SCALE: NTS SCL POLE e 15-oott 3 AS —BUILT 2 REVISION # 1 9.19.2015 BB KM ORIGINAL NO. DATE ENG DESIGN DRAFTING COMMENT MGEi ZAYO ENGINEER: ROBERT THOMAN ENGINEERING FIRM: MGC TECHNICAL CONSTULTING, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: 3104 S IRVING ST SEATTLE, WA, 98144-3928 DRAWING NAME: SEA-20-AERIAL-01.dwg CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY SHEET: 5 OF 6 TYPICAL DETAIL — A POLE ARRANGEMENT FOR AERIAL TO BURIED CABLE FIBER CABLE SEE DETML H POLE TOP VIEW GROUND LEVEL TYPICAL DETAIL — D SUPPORT STRAND AERIAL TYPICALS TYPICAL DETAIL — B POLE ARRANGEMENT FOR REPEATER OR HANDHOLE LOCATION CABLE LASHING WIRE CLAMP S A NL€SS STEEL LASHER CABLE SUPPORT AND 1/2" SPACER CAUTION TAG FIBER OPNC CABLE BLACK IN COLOR SEE DETAIL H 42" MIN. STEEL CONDUIT TO rHANDHOLE " STEEL BEND (36" RADIUS) CABLE CLAMP CABLE U—GUAR GROUND LEVEL x (X-MIN. OF 20 TIMES THE CABLE DIA) 24" POLE 6" MIN. ali 11f111•' 1VL- USE APPROPRIATE PVC TO STEEL COUPLER VARIES TYPICAL DETAIL — G JOINING 045 LASHING WIRE REMOVE ANY SLACK IN THE LASHING WIRE BY MNNTMNING A PULL ON THE WIRE AND TAPPING THE STRAND SHARPLY. THEN FORM THE WIRE OVER THE STUD AND TIGHTEN THE NUT. CUT THE FREE END OF THE LASHING WIRE OFF 3/4" BEYOND THE END OF THE CLAMP. FORM THE LASHING WIRE AROUND THE STRAND AND PLACE IT BELOW THE STUD AND BETWEEN THE SECOND WASHER AND STUD SHOULDER. FORMING WIRE OVER STUD OF CLAMP FORMING LASHING WIRE AROUND STRAND POLE TOP VIEW CONDUIT ON QUARTER ON POLE LEAST EXPOSED TO TRAVEL WAY. • NDUIS WITH DUCT PLUGS AND SIMPLEX PLUGS TYPICAL DETAIL — E SUSPENSION STRAND — PULL AWAY FROM POLE — 5 FEET OR MORE POLE TOP CABLE SUSPENSION BOLT CURVED WASHER 5/8* X 2" ROUN WASHER CORNER SUSPENSION CLAMP TYPICAL DETAIL — H LASHING WIRE GRIP AND CLAMP C LASHING WIRE GRIP INSTALLED ON STRAND C LASHING WIRE GRIP NOTE LASHING WIRE SHOULD FOLLOW LAY OF STRAND WIRES UNDER GRIP. D CABLE LASHING CLAMP SHOULDER CLAMPING NUT THREADED STUD GROOVED PLATES 2 GUY HOOK SPACER NUT 1ST LASHING WIRE 2ND LASHING WIRE TERMINATING NUT 1ST WASHER 2ND WASHER GUY TYPICAL DETAIL — C TYPICAL CABLE & HARDWARE INSTALLATION (6.6M STRAND \ 10M STRAND) GROUND WIRE CLAMP 6.6M OR 10M STRAN STAINLESS STEEL LASHER CABLE SUPPORT AND 1/2" SPAC /6 INSULATED COPPER WIRE AND 10'X3/4" COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD 12" 10" 10" T= GROUND EVERYI/4 MILE AT STRAND TO SHEATH BOND LOCATION CABLE LASHING WIRE CLAMP CAUTION TAG FIBER OPTIC CABLE ORANGE IN COLOR POLE TYPICAL DETAIL — F TYPICAL ARRANGEMENT OF CABLE LASHER AND CABLE GUIDE TYPICAL DETAIL — I SUSPENSION STRAND — PULL TOWARD POLE — LESS THAN 5 FEET CURVED WASHER CABLE SUSPENSION BOLT 2 GUY HOOK SPACER NUT GROUND LEVEL CURVED WASHER GUY �T ��'—_— 5/8" CABLE SUSPENSION BOLT CABLE SUSPENSION CLAMP GUY Know what's below. ei s—dd can before you dig. 3 2 1 9.19.2015 BB NO AS —BUILT REVISION ii 1 KM ORIGINAL DATE ENG DESIGN DRAFTING COMMENT GROUPaa MGE: •"'" ZAYO ENGINEER: ROBERT THOMAN ENGINEERING FIRM: MGC TECHNICAL CONSTULTING, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: 3104 S IRVING ST SEATTLE, WA, 98144-3928 DRAWING NAME: SEA-20-AERIAL-01.dwg CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY SHEET: 6 OF 6