HomeMy WebLinkAboutFSC 2024-02-07 Agenda PacketCITY OF TUKWILA
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING #4 1 FEBRUARY 7, 2024
:ill
MEETING AGENDA
■ Welcome and Recap of Meeting 3 (10 mins)
■ Overview of Other Funds (20 mins)
■ Financial Plan Overview (30 mins)
■ Potential Committee Recommendations (45 mins)
■ Meeting Recap and Close (15 mins)
II
2
PROJECT ARC
Meeting 1
Meeting 2
Meeting 3
Meeting 4
Meeting 5
Meeting 6
Community
Context
Who lives here?
What kind of
businesses?
What is the composition
of the Tukwila
economy?
Community
Values and
Priorities
Revenue
Mix
General
Spending
What does the community desire?
What are the City's biggest costs?
How do City revenue tools compare to
others?
City Programs and Services
Gather Potential Principles and Recommendations in meetings 1-4
Identify
themes and
preferred
strategies
What are the City's greatest needs? How
might efficiencies be gained?
What programs and services best align
with community priorities?
Financial forecast
Full Set of Recommendations
How can we best balance the City's financial
sustainability, the provision of City services that meet
community expectations, and equity in costs and
services?
MEETING 3 RECAP
CITY FINANCES AND SERVICES
1
City revenues are (mostly) paid
for by residents and businesses
through taxes, fees, and rates.
Considerations
• Revenue tools in use.
• Rate compared to neighbors
and peers.
• Distribution of burden
between residents and
businesses.
• Nexus between payment and
benefit.
City expenses are directly or
indirectly incurred in delivering
services to residents and
businesses. Some services help
residents and businesses do well,
supporting their ability to
contribute to City revenues.
Considerations
• Service mix and levels of
service.
• Inflation (labor and capital).
• Capital needs.
Financial
ustainability
A city can't run a deficit.
One-time funds and levels
of service adjustments are
used to match revenues.
There is almost always a
gap in actual and desired
services. This gap is not
visible in the City's
forecast.
Considerations
• Unmet operating
needs and capital
investments.
Impacts of population
growth and inflation.
A city's fiscal sustainability depends on its land uses. The mix of commercial and residential property has an
impact on both City revenues and City costs. It drives the revenue the City collects and demand for City
services.
Revenue and
service mix that
is sustainable
and equitable.
:ill
5
POSTER ACTIVITY
Questions to consider:
• How can we prioritize program and
services that meet the Tukwila
community's needs? See a reminder of
the Tukwila Community Profile at right.
• Looking at each category of services,
where are opportunities for the City to
provide:
• more services?
• the same level of service?
• less service?
We'II review a summary of your input under
the Potential Committee Recommendations
section of this meeting.
Community Profile Highlights (from Meeting 1)
• Tukwila is a growing community, with more diversity and younger
residents than King County. Tukwila School District has students that
represent many cultures and speak more than 80 world languages.
• Tukwila has a higher share of low-income households than King
County, particularly among renters.
• Tukwila residents identify as less healthy than residents in King
County and Washington State.
• Tukwila has a very high jobs to population ratio, with a strong
commercial sector that includes retail sales and manufacturing.
Employment growth in Tukwila has been slower than peer cities, but
jobs are projected to grow over the next two decades.
• Most businesses in Tukwila have 100 or fewer employees and
most jobs are in the services, retail, and manufacturing sectors. Most
workers in Tukwila commute from outside the City. The influx of
workers and daytime visitors drives up the demand for public
services.
• More than half of Tukwila's General Fund revenues are from
property and sales taxes. With the Southcenter mall, a majority of
Tukwila's taxable retail sales are attributed to consumer shopping.
• Tukwila's largest General Fund expenditure is toward Police services,
which is similar to peer cities.
OVERVIEW OF OTHER FUNDS
CITY F
Most of our focus
so far has been
here
We want to share a
bit about 1) capital
projects...
...and 2) enterprise
funds
City of Tukwila
Governmental Funds
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Projects Fund
Debt Service Funds
Proprietary Funds
Enterprise Funds
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
J
Surface Water Fund
Internal Service Funds
Golf Course Fund
CAPITAL PROJECTS OVERVIEW
• The City develops a six -year Capital Improvement Program-(CIP), which
identifies priority investments in infrastructure and facilities. This is a
planning document and a companion to the operating budget. It is
reviewed and updated every two years and is currently addressing 2023 to
2028.
• Capital investments include arterial streets, bridges, parks, and City facilities.
• The CIP is fiscally constrained: projects must have funding identified to be
included in the CIP. Identified funding includes anticipated grant awards.
The CIP is therefore not a comprehensive tally of the City's full capital need.
• Capital projects are typically funded by grants, impact fees, taxes restricted
to capital projects (e.g. Real Estate Excise Tax), and bond proceeds. Very
little General Fund revenues (except for debt service repayment) are used to
fund capital projects.
City of Tukwila, Washington
yFr
2023-2028,
FINANCIAL PLANNING MODEL AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -PROGRAM _
ti. Pubiic Works Ffeet& Facilities Building
Opened 07/24/22
2022
Novemb
No199
9
CAPITAL PROJECTS OVERVIEW
Recently completed projects Planned or potential projects
• Justice Center • 42nd Ave South Bridge
• Fire Stations 51 and 52 ■ Public Works Shops Phase II
• Public Works Shops Phase I • Annual investment in street overlays
• S. 1 19th St. Bridge Raised Crosswalk & Safety • Pedestrian and other safety -related improvements
Improvements • Improvements to park amenities and trails
• S. 152nd St. Safe Routes to School
•
The full capital program can be found here: Allentown Truck Reroute
Capital Improvement Program • Tukwila Community Center HVAC Replacement
:ill
10
CAPITAL PROJECTS -CHALLENGES
■ The CIP or Operating Budget does not address the full backlog in
infrastructure maintenance needs, including ADA projects (see text
box).
■ Funding for ongoing projects, such as the arterial street overlay
program or residential street traffic calming program, has
increased, but not at the rate of inflation. The City has increased
parking tax revenue and solid waste utility tax, which are both
dedicated to capital projects.
■ The City could better use asset management approaches and
tools to efficiently maintain capital assets, including facilities.
■ The City depends on grant revenue to pay for projects.
■ Funding to maintain new facilities or infrastructure is not
consistently included in the Operating Budget.
The Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) was enacted on July 26, 1990,
and provides comprehensive civil rights
protections to persons with disabilities
in the areas of employment, state and
local government services, and access
to public accommodations,
transportation, and
telecommunications.
Cities and other government agencies
are required to have an ADA self -
assessment and transition plan when
they grow beyond a threshold of 50 full-
time equivalent employees
Tukwila's CIP includes $100,000 for ADA
improvements in 2023 and $50,000 per
year between 2024 and 2028.
Investments will continue until City
facilities and infrastructure meet ADA
requirements, including compliance by
utilities and private companies.
11
ENTERPRISE FUNDS: FOSTER GOLF COURSE
■ The Golf Course operates as an enterprise fund. An enterprise fund collects revenue from
users/customers and pays for its own operations and capital improvements.
■ In 2023 revenues for the Golf Course were $2.6 million, including an annual transfer of $80,000
(net) from the General Fund.
■ Other facilities and services, including the Tukwila Community Center, youth, teen and senior
recreation programs, special events, arts and activities, are subsidized by the General Fund as well.
■ The City is currently reevaluating its cost -recovery framework and implementing a new business
plan for the Golf Course.
12
ENTERPRISE FUNDS: UTILITY RATE STUDY UPDATE
■ In parallel with the work of the Financial Sustainabilty Committee, a consultant is conducting a utility
rate study update.
■ The next few slides provide an overview of this work.
13
WHY ARE RATE STUDIES IMPORTANT?
n
Your Utility Is A Business
■ Revenues need to cover utility costs and capital related to the utility
■ Revenues dedicated to utility purpose
■ Quantifies policies, priorities, and initiatives
■ Tells the "true" cost of providing service
■ Revenues from the utilities cannot be used to subsidize general fund
operations
Public Accountability
■ Communicates impact of financial decisions
■ Public meetings
•:;> FCS CROUP
Solutions -Oriented Consulting
COMPREHENSIVE RATE STUDY: START TO FINISH
Communication
Plan
communication is
needed?
What level of
L
Do your rate
tructures align with
your objectives?
n
Financial
Policy
Evaluation
Rate Study
Components
Rate Design
Are you adequately
protected against
financial risks?
Revenue
Requirement
Forecast
Cost -of -
Service
Analysis
Are your revenues
sufficient to
achieve full cost
recovery?
Are you charging
your customers
equitably?
L
.,• FCS GROUP
Solutions -Oriented Consulting
REVENUE REQUIREMENT INTRODUCTION
■ Utility rates are set to recover the cost of providing service
■ Financial policies
■ Operating costs (regular / ongoing)
■ Employee salaries and benefits
■ Routine inspections & maintenance
■ Professional services
■ Utilities (e.g. electricity)
■ Capital costs (periodic)
■ Infrastructure replacement
■ Facility expansions and upgrades
:ill
1 I
1
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
■ Operating ❑ Capital
• FCS GROUP
Solutions -Oriented Consulting
HOW MUCH REVENUE IS NEEDED?
Financial Policy Impacts
Forecasted Operating & Maintenance Costs
Rate Funded Capital
Existing & New Debt Service
}
Annual
Revenue
Needs
.•
�•;> FCS GROUP
:ill
Solutions -Oriented Consulting
HOW WILL COSTS BE EQUITABLY DISTRIBUTED?
Revenue Needs: How big is the pie?
1
Cost of Service: How should the pie be sliced?
• Residential
• Commercial/Industrial
•:> FCS GROUP
Solutions -Oriented Consulting
POTENTIAL COMMITTEE GUIDANCE
ON CAPITAL PROJECTS AND ENTERPRISE FUNDS
■ Consider the community return on investment when evaluating the need,
purpose, and design for new facilities.
■ Consider the fiscal sustainability of ongoing maintenance needs when
evaluating potential capital investments.
■ Calibrate user fees and program revenue goals with ability to pay and social
return on investment.
■ Other?
II
19
FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW
A REMINDER: PROGRAMS & SERVICES OVERVIEW HIGHLIGHTS
■ The City provides many services. Some services are required by federal, state, or local statute, and
some are discretionary.
■ Service levels were reduced during the pandemic and not all services have been restored to pre -
pandemic levels.
■ Costs and demand for City services
■ The demographic makeup of the Tukwila community necessitates a high level of service.
■ Population and employment growth drive staff workload and will increase demands on the City's
infrastructure.
■ The cost of providing existing services is increasing due to factors such as inflation, minimum wage
requirements, and technology and training needs.
21
A REMINDER: PROPERTY TAX IN WASHINGTON
Illustrative Example
Funding gaps
■ In Washington, a jurisdiction's property tax revenues can only
increase by 1% annually, unless the public votes for a greater
increase (a levy lid lift). This is the result of Legislative action
following the passage of Initiative 747 in 2001.
■ Expenditures typically grow significantly more than 1%
annually due to inflation, which creates a structural gap between
property tax revenues and expenses.
[
[
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
■ Property Tax (1% annual growth)
■ Expenditures (3% annual growth)
:ill
22
COST AND REVENUE OPTIONS
These are the cost
levers we can
adjust.
Cost Tool
Limit growth in
baseline costs
Change levels of
service
Deliver services
differently
Other?
• Find efficiencies, such as streamlining processes
• Add programs or eliminate programs
• Increase or decrease levels of service
• Partner with other entities to provide services
• Identify opportunities for the private/non-profit
sectors to deliver services
II
COST AND REVENUE OPTIONS
These are the
revenue levers we
can adjust.
Revenue Tool
Options
1
Property tax revenue
•Adjust the levy rate
• Use banked levy capacity
• Encourage new development to expand the tax base
Dedicated funding for • Establish a dedicated funding stream for transportation
infrastructure or parks
User fee revenue
Sales tax revenue
Business taxes/fees
• Establish cost recovery principles
• Adjust the tax rate
• Encourage commercial growth to expand the tax base
• Adjust the business tax rate or business license fee
• Encourage business growth
Grant revenue • Seek to increase grant revenues
Other?
II
MIM
FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW
■ The City develops a six -year financial plan for the General Fund to see the impact of
financial policies and budget decisions. It helps answer questions such as:
■ What impact will this year's budget decisions have on the future?
■ What is the future impact of a potential policy decision?
■ Revenues and expenditures are projected based on economic factors, past trends, and
known program or policy changes including:
■ Property tax growth limit
■ Debt service obligations
■ Contractually obligated cost increases
■ Trends in sales tax revenue
II
CURRENT GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL PLAN
■ The City's six -year plan restores
services to pre-COVID levels and
funds positions that had been frozen
or funded by one-time revenues.
■ The plan adds a B&O tax and uses
some property tax capacity created
by fire annexation.
■ Overall, the City's property tax rate
decreases.
4 Revenue growth is sufficient to fund
planned expenditures and leave a
margin of 1-3% of annual revenues
$ 80,000,000
$75,000,000
$70,000,000
$65,000,000
$60,000,000
$55,000,000
$50,000,000
$45,000,000
$40,000,000
impcfct of fire
cmnexcrtion
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Total Revenues Total Expenditures
II
26
■
FINANCIAL PLAN AND OPTIONS
■ What questions do you have?
■ What observations do you have?
Next meeting: What does the 6-year financial forecast look like if we
incorporate the Committee's draft recommendations?
4 We will share a forecast scenario in Meeting 5 based on today's discussion.
II
27
POTENTIAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
•
:ill
28
POTENTIAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
We've identified themes based on the Committee's review of City programs, services,
priorities, and needs in Meeting 3, as well as ideas raised in Meetings 1 and 2.
■ Tonight: gain additional Committee input (not decision making).
■ Meeting 5: see the impact these ideas would have on the City's financial forecast
and work towards draft recommendations.
■ Meeting 6: finalize recommendations.
Questions:
■ What themes should be high priority? Which should be lower priority?
■ Are there any themes you disagree with? Others you would add?
29
MEETING CLOSE
UPCOMING MEETINGS
• Update to City Council February 12 Committee of the Whole
• Meeting 5: Options Discussion (March 5, Tuesday)
• Utility Study Update with consultants from FCSG GROUP
• Updated Financial Forecast and Recommendations
• Options for Cost Savings
• Options for Revenue Generation
• Distribution of Burden across Businesses and Residents
• Meeting 6: Recommendations Discussion (April 3, Wednesday)
? Would April 2, Tuesday, work for everyone?
■ Final delivery of recommendations to City Council (April)
The City is developing
strategies for community
engagement for the
upcoming budget
development process.
iii
31
ROUNDTABLE CLOSING COMMENTS
Working Draft Content
Emergent Themes
Tukwila Financial Sustainability Plan I February 2024
Overview
This document identifies themes based on the Financial Sustainability Committee's review of City
programs, services, priorities, and needs in Meeting 3, as well as ideas raised in Meetings 1 and 2. With
refinement and agreement, we can see the impact these ideas would have on the City's financial
forecast and work towards draft recommendations.
For each theme, it is noted if it has been raised by staff, the Committee, or both:
Hi
= identified AN00 by staff = identified by Committee
Some themes could be recommended guiding principles the City should consider when developing future
budgets. The financial impact may be difficult to quantify in the short-term, but it could have a long-term
cost or revenue impact. Others, such as increasing or decreasing the level of service of a program, may
have a known short-term financial impact.
= financial impact
� -
= guiding principle
There are notes included for some themes that provide additional context to help the Committee members
determine how they would prioritize these themes.
Questions to Consider
• What themes should be high priority? Which should be lower priority?
• Are there any themes you disagree with? Others you would add?
:111
Working Draft Content
Land Use
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle Notes
Consider the fiscal implications (revenues
and increased costs by program) when
making land use decisions.
Hi
SiNSiNi?
Encourage business growth and build on
the existing strong commercial sector.
Business growth could
have a positive impact on
City revenues.
Depending on the type,
growth has an on impact
the demand for services
as well.
Promoting more housing options is also
important, both for renters and owners.
Hi
00110
Development could have
a positive impact on City
revenues.
Depending on the type,
growth has an on impact
the demand for services
as well.
Support the development of walkable
spaces that function well for residents and
visitors.
Overall and General Government
Hi
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle
Notes
Conduct rolling program audits to find
opportunities for greater efficiency and
effectiveness.
Hi
MO
There may be a potential
cost associated with this
cis staff will be needed to
conduct audits. There may
be long-term cost savings.
Review and streamline processes to allow
staff to keep up with workload or address
additional tasks.
Hi
MO
This may require up -front
costs and may not
achieve significant cost
savings but could allow
the current level of
staffing to maintain
service levels.
Consider opportunities to shift positions to
meet needs and dedicate time to cross -
training to help staff meet workload
demands with existing resources
NON
MN
This may be a challenge
because the City must
work within the
boundaries of union
contracts.
Add resources dedicated to grant
administration to maximize potential grant
revenue for the City
)IIIIII
OH
S�NSiNSi
The City added a grants
analyst in Public Works
within the last few years.
,I February 2, 2024 City of Tukwila I Financial Sustainabilty Plan Emergent Themes
2
Working Draft Content
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle Notes
Other departments could
benefit from a dedicated
grant analyst.
Invest in retaining quality staff, which is
cheaper than the cost of turnover.
NSIN
S?N0N0
There may be a potential
cost associated with this,
as the City will need to
invest in staff training.
Invest in financial management.
N0'
NS?NS?
The City recently invested
in a new enterprise
financial management
system. Implementation is
a multi -year process.
Evaluate the return on investment for the
Tukwila community. This cannot always be
quantified.
NRN
0100
Seek the most efficient and effective ways
to provide services, including contracting,
collaboration, and alternative staffing
approaches.
Hi
01010
Reduce resources dedicated to equity.
101
The City Council adopted
an Equity Policy in 2017.
Increase resources to support hiring and
recruiting.
$
This would have a new
cost.
Increase resources to support citywide data
analysis.
1111111
$
This would have a new
cost.
Increase resources for information
technology security and emergency
preparedness.
$
This would have a new
cost.
Community and Economic Development
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle
Notes
Review and streamline processes to allow
staff to keep up with workload or address
additional tasks.
OHO
This may require up -front
costs and may not
achieve significant cost
savings but could allow
the current level of
staffing to maintain
service levels.
Invest in business and development
attraction and retention activities.
N 0'
SIN�N0
The General Fund budget
amount for this program
is $1 18,000.
rill February 2, 2024 City of Tukwila 1 Financial Sustainabilty Plan Emergent Themes
3
Working Draft Content
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle Notes
Prioritize permitting and rental housing
inspection functions.
101
01010
$
The General Fund budget
amount for these
programs is $860,000.
Deprioritize long-range planning, as well
as destination development and tourism
marketing.
Long-range planning is a
state -mandated activity.
Destination development
and tourism marketing
are funded by lodging
tax revenues, which are
restricted in their use.
Increase resources for environmental
planning.
Community Engagement
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle Notes
Seek efficiency (perhaps via electronic
records) in responding to public records
requests, which is a mandated function.
101
Responses to public
records requests are
largely digital and the
City has been steadily
digitizing old records as
a priority. Public records
requests require
reviewing electronic
documents.
Reduce spending on community
engagement or allocate resources to
targeted engagement efforts. Build on
existing engagement opportunities.
101
The current General Fund
budget amount for this
program across all
departments is $2.3M.
The Committee expressed
interest in getting more
input from the community
to help make decisions.
Review the charge and purpose of Boards
and Commissions to ensure these entities
are being utilized to their full potential.
Hi
Increase resources to support the growing
volume and complexity of public records
requests.
�IIIIII(
$
rill February 2, 2024 City of Tukwila I Financial Sustainabilty Plan Emergent Themes
4
Working Draft Content
Culture and Recreation
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle Notes
Add resources dedicated to grant
administration to maximize potential grant
revenue for the City.
The City added a grants
analyst in Public Works
within the last few years.
Other departments could
benefit from a dedicated
grant analyst.
Review programs and services that were
reduced during the pandemic and
determine what to restore based on need
and demand.
HRH
WOO
This is part of the City's
budget development
process.
Consider increasing programs and services
for preschool kids and youth/teens.
HRH
The General Fund budget
amount for these
programs is $953,000.
Parks is re -assessing and
refining current
programming to meet the
community's needs.
Explore opportunities to collaborate with
other cities to meet housing and social
services needs.
HRH
RHON
Collaboration depends on
the willingness and
financial capacity of
other cities.
Evaluate the value of facility rentals.
HRH
Parks is assessing the
current mix between
providing programs at
the Tukwila Community
Center and providing
rental opportunities.
Increase resources to support environmental
stewardship.
Increase resources dedicated to long-term
capital planning.
Infrastructure Maintenance/Improvement
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle Notes
Add resources dedicated to grant
administration to maximize potential grant
revenue for the City.
The City added a grants
analyst in Public Works
within the last few years.
Other departments could
benefit from a
dedicated grant analyst.
Prioritize sidewalks, potholes, and litter
control, TIB bus stop/streetscape,
HRH
OM
The General Fund
budget amount for these
programs is $1.7M.
:111 February 2, 2024 City of Tukwila 1 Financial Sustainabilty Plan Emergent Themes
5
Working Draft Content
Themes
Staff / Committee Financial / Principle Notes
streetscapes/median landscape, park
restrooms contract.
Increase resources for facility maintenance.
IIIIIIII
Align funding for infrastructure
maintenance with inflationary cost
increases.
$
Public Safety
Themes
Staff / Committee
Financial /
Principle
Notes
As a community, determine how to define
"public safety".
00000
Consider focusing on restorative justice and
programs for youth.
$
Consider using non -uniform personnel for
some duties.
000
This may be a challenge
because the City must work
within the boundaries of
union contracts.
Maintain funding for police patrol services.
0011
SIN�Ni?
The current General Fund
budget amount for this
program is $9M.
The City adopted the B&O
tax to maintain the level of
police services.
Prioritize narcotics & human traffic
investigations; investigation of felony and
juvenile crimes; and professional
development and training.
000
N0'�N0
The current General Fund
budget amount for these
programs is $3.8M.
Assess the community return on investment
for the school zone safety camera
program.
000
0010
This program generates
funds to offset the cost of
operations. It has a positive
public safety benefit.
rill February 2, 2024 City of Tukwila I Financial Sustainabilty Plan Emergent Themes
6
Working Draft Content
City of Tukwila Program Overview
Financial Sustainability Plan I Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1/9/24
This document summarizes input provided on posters at the third meeting of the Financial Sustainability
Committee, on January 9, 2024. The ideas contained here are not draft recommendations and are subject to
significant additional discussion and refinement by the Committee.
■ This content should be taken as it was intended: as a rough, mid -process expression of observations and
questions by Committee members.
■ Please do not circulate this material beyond Committee membership as it is work -in -progress.
Summary 2
Land Use 2
Overall and General Government 2
Community and Economic Development 2
Community Engagement 3
Culture and Recreation 3
Infrastructure Maintenance/Improvement 3
Public Safety 3
Raw Input from Committee 3
Land Use 4
All Categories 5
Community and Economic Development 6
Community Engagement 8
Culture and Recreation 9
General Government 11
Infrastructure Maintenance and Improvement 14
Public Safety 16
Financial Sustainability Plan I Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 1
Working Draft Content
Summary
This Summary section was drafted by the consulting team. The input provided by the Committee is represented
verbatim in the following section.
Land Use
• Consider the fiscal implications (revenues and increased costs by program) when making land use decisions.
■ Encourage business growth and build on the existing strong commercial sector. Businesses provide significant
revenue for the City. Promoting more housing options is also important, both for renters and owners.
Consider the inclusion of parking options for those who rely on a vehicle.
• Support the development of walkable spaces that function well for residents and visitors.
Overall and General Government
■ Investing in infrastructure and public safety are the highest priority categories. Encouraging economic
development is also a priority because of the potential revenue impacts.
■ Administration is a large program in each category, and it is unclear what this function provides.
• Conduct rolling program audits to find opportunities for greater efficiency and effectiveness.
■ Review and streamline processes to allow staff to keep up with workload or address additional tasks.
■ Consider opportunities to shift positions to meet needs and dedicate time to cross -training to help staff meet
workload demands with existing resources.
■ Add resources dedicated to grant administration to maximize potential grant revenue for the City.
■ Invest in retaining quality staff, which is cheaper than the cost of turnover.
■ Invest in financial management.
■ Evaluate the return on investment for the Tukwila community. This cannot always be quantified.
■ Seek the most efficient and effective ways to provide services, including contracting, collaboration, and
alternative staffing approaches.
■ Reduce resources dedicated to equity.
■ Generally, the same level of service in this category is preferred.
Community and Economic Development
■ Review and streamline processes to allow staff to keep up with workload or address additional tasks.
■ Invest in business and development attraction and retention activities.
■ Prioritize permitting and rental housing inspection functions.
■ Deprioritize long-range planning, as well as destination development and tourism marketing. [Additional
discussion is needed as planning is mandated and tourism marketing is funded by dedicated revenues that
cannot be used for alternative uses.]
Financial Sustainability Plan 1 Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 2
Working Draft Content
Community Engagement
■ Seek efficiency (perhaps via electronic records) in responding to public records requests, which is a
mandated function.
■ Reduce spending on community engagement or allocate resources to targeted engagement efforts. Build on
existing engagement opportunities and explore options for gathering statistically valid input.
■ Review the charge and purpose of Boards and Commissions to ensure these entities are being utilized to
their full potential.
Culture and Recreation
■ Add resources dedicated to grant administration to maximize potential grant revenue for the City.
■ Review programs and services that were reduced during the pandemic and determine what to restore
based on need and demand.
• Consider increasing programs and service for preschool -aged children and youth/teens.
■ Explore opportunities to collaborate with other cities to meet housing and social services needs.
■ Evaluate the value of renting City spaces for public use.
Infrastructure Maintenance/Improvement
■ Add resources dedicated to grant administration to maximize potential grant revenue for the City.
■ These programs should be a high priority: sidewalks, pothole, and litter control; TIB bus stop/streetscape;
streetscapes/median landscaping; and park restrooms.
Public Safety
■ As a community, determine how to define "public safety".
■ Consider focusing on restorative justice and programs for youth.
• Consider using non -uniform personnel for some duties.
■ Maintain funding for police patrol services.
■ These programs should be a high priority: narcotics & human traffic investigations; investigation of felony
and juvenile crimes; and professional development and training.
■ Assess the community return on investment for the school zone safety camera program.
Raw Input from Committee
The following pages contain the dots and post -it comments provided by Committee members.
Financial Sustainability Plan 1 Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 3
Working Draft Content
Land Use
How should consideration of the fiscal impacts of development affect the City's approach to economic development and land use regulation?
Comments from Committee members:
■ Incentivize desired development; encourage business growth (they already subsidize residents, build on that); avoid disincentives for value add
(commerce) or essential services (health and housing)
■ Promote housing: Multi -family, missing middle, ADU/DADU
■ Do not promote more industrial uses
■ Lack of parking at apartments and public spaces disproportionately affects those with less options (marginalized)
■ Stop demonizing renters. There are many people and reasons who choose not to own a home. We need to encourage intergenerational housing
and provide more housing types.
■ Tukwila has no parking! i.e., Bellwether, SHAG
■ Greater retail/restaurant in a pseudo downtown setting. Where can we create a "walkable community center" such as Downtown Enumclaw or
Downtown Renton?
■ Investing large draw businesses such as a new ice complex
■ Middle housing support. How do we encourage ownership? Higher revenue and lower cost/use — condos, townhouse, duplex, OWNER OCCUPIED!
▪ Adjacent comment: Yes
▪ Adjacent comment: We need this type of housing to attract good grocery stores, local restaurants, drug store/pharmacy, etc.
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 4
Working Draft Content
All Categories
Where are opportunities for the City to provide less service, the same level of service, or more service at the category level?
Less Service e Service
Infrastructure maintenance/improvement
3.5
Public safety
Community and economic development
Culture and recreation
More Service
6.5
(Comment) Very important
1.5 1 0.5 5
(Comment) How do we as a community want to define public
safety structures?
4
(Comment) With more economic development you can pay for
more services.
3.5
Community engagement
3
General government
1.5
Note
All tables in this section have been sorted to put categories
that scored higher on "More Service" or "High Priority" at
the top.
Higher scores are shaded a pink color.
1
2.5
5
1. 3.5
3
1
Financial Sustainability Plan I Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1/9/24 5
Working Draft Content
Community and Economic Development
Priorities and Unfunded Needs
Staff to support a higher level of environmental permitting.
Bringing service levels back up to pre -pandemic levels.
Investment in staff and succession planning to ensure the City can
maintain service levels and retain high quality staff.
Opportunities for Efficiencies
s
2
2
Reviewing and streamlining processes to allow staff to keep up
with workload or address additional tasks.
0
Potentially shifting positions to meet needs and dedicating time to
cross -training to help staff meet workload demands with existing
resources.
2
4
1
3
(Comment) x1000
(Comment) Also dept.
audit for efficiencies
1
(Comment) *if unfreezing
positions expedites the
permitting process, then do it.
7
(Comment) Department
audit by outside agency is
critically needed
(Comment) But expensive
(Comment) Look at silos.
2
0
1
(Comment) Would cross training
lower efficiency?
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs
Program
Mandate
Less Service More Service
Questions
and Comments
1. Business & Development Attraction/Retention $1 36,714
0.5 N - Best Practice
2. Construction Permit Review & Inspection
$1,241,580
7.6 Y - Federal/State
0.5
3. Permit Intake, Issuance, Coordination
$689,749
4.9 Y - Federal/State
4. Code Enforcement
$518,412 3.2
Y - City Code
5. Rental Housing
$169,516
1.2
Y - City Code
2
. Mandatory Training
$49,918
0.2 Y - Federal/State
2
0.5
4.5
4
4
1.5
(Comment) Same service
(Comment) Same service
1 dot underneath
(Comment) Same service
Ditto marks underneath
(Comment) Same service
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services
1/9/24
6
Working Draft Content
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
NOM
. Long -Range & Comprehensive Planning
$382,649
1.6 Y - Federal/State
. City Property Development & Management
$86,915
0.4 N - No Mandate
..............
9. Professional Development & Training
$157,785
1.0 Y - Ordinance Resolution 1
10. Current Planning
$ 375,975
2.0 Y - Federal/State
2
11. Ordinance, Resolution and Code Development
$145,831
0.8 Y - Federal/State
2
12. Business License Administration
$24,255
0.2
Y - City Code
2
13. Community Investment
$1,966,626
7.8 N - Best Practice
2
14. Lodging Tax Oversight/Support
$72,096
0.2
Y - City Code
3
15. City Policy Development
$19,166
0.1 Y - Federal/State
3
16. Destination Development
$439,993
0.1 N - Best Practice
4
17. Tourism Marketing
$399,965
0.3 N - Best Practice
18. Administration
$462,304 2.5 Y - Federal/State
More Service
1
Questions
and Comments
(Comment) Same service
(Comment) Same service
(Comment) Same service
(Comment) Samc scrvicc
5
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1/9/24 7
Working Draft Content
Community Engagement
Priorities and Unfunded Needs
Training for existing staff to maintain certifications/credentials and keep
current on best practices and changes in regulations.
5
11
Staff to support the increase in the number and complexity of public records --
requests.
r3
(Comment) As needed
1 don't know
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program Less More Questions
Mandate Service Service and Comments
1. Digital Records Center
2. Boards/Commissions/Committees
$182,968 1.0
$352,757 1.5
3. Public Records Requests & Records Management $1,192,875 8.8
4. Communications & Community Engagement
$2,328,591 12.0
Y-
Federal/State
Y - City Code
Y-
Federal/State
N - Best
Practice
0.5
1.5
5
1
1.5
0.5
0
(Dot) Same
(Comment) If we go fully digital, we can eliminate
FTEs. Permits, law, Reports.
(Dot) Same
(Comment) How many
boa rds/commissions/committees?
(Comment) The change and purpose of each
Board and Commission, with the exception of the
Planning Commission, needs work. We have these
entities but I don't think they are being utilized to
their full and best potential.
(Dot) Same
(Comment) Same or less
(Comment) Same
Total
$4,057,191 23.3
Financial Sustainability Plan I Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 8
Working Draft Content
Culture and Recreation
Priorities and Unfunded Needs
Resources dedicated to grant administration to maximize
potential grant revenue for the City
Restoring service levels to pre -pandemic levels
2
Promoting and administering citywide volunteer
opportunities, programs, and initiatives
Resources dedicated to facility planning, maintenance, and
operations
Addressing physical and operational inequities, including
enhanced language access services, ADA transition planning,
and barrier elimination
Opportunities for Efficiencies
2
3
2
5
•
3
(Comment) Depends on
service
2
2
3
3
(Comment) How much staff currently
does grant work? How is it currently
prioritized?
Low Priority
Medium Priority High Priority
't
Exploration of alternative service delivery methods, such as
shared service delivery or joint efforts w/other
organizations/neighboring cities.
Program
Name
Preschool Services and Program
2. Youth & Teen Services & Programs
3. Professional Development & Training
..................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. Wellness & Adult Services & Programs
..................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Older Adult Services and Programs
6. Mandatory Training
2024 Budget
$82,715
$869,555
..............................................
$65,564
..............................................
$342,810
..............................................
$354,767
..............................................
$9,158
3
2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
0.6 N - No Mandate
2.0 N - No Mandate
0.2
1.1
1.8
0.1
Less
Service
3
Y - Ordinance/Resolution 1
.................................................................................
N - No Mandate
.................................................................................
N - No Mandate
..................................................................................
Y - Federal/State
3
(Comment) Teaming up with local cities
for housing options
More Service Questions
and Comments
0
2
(Comment)
(Comment) Maybe income/need
based cost increase programs
(Comment) Same
(Comment) Same
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24
9
Working Draft Content
Program
Name
2024 Budget
2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
Less
Service
More Service Questions
and Comments
7. Facility Rentals
8. Administration
$147,477
$749,782
0.5 N - No Mandate
4.8 Y - Federal State
2
4
(Comment) What kind of facilities
are rented?
(Dot) Same
(Comment) Agree — what
facilities? — need — community led
decisions
(Comment) Cost -benefit to
building our own facilities?
(Comment) This is the 5th time I
have seen a generic
"Administration" — Details? What
are they doing?
Tota I
MIEEITMEMI
Financial Sustainability Plan I Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 10
Working Draft Content
General Government
Priorities and Unfunded Needs
Low Priority
Medium Priority
High Priority
1 don't know
Resources dedicated to grant administration to maximize potential
grant revenue for the City
3
Investment in staff and succession planning to ensure the City can 2
maintain service levels and retain high quality staff.
Operational support for capital investments, such as staff to
implement and maintain new technology
Opportunities for Efficiencies
4
Low Priority
3
•
Medium Priority
6
2
(Comment) Hiring new
staff is more expensive
than retaining staff.
Sustain staffing levels to
save money.
High Priority
(Comment) What new tech?
1 don't know
Potentially shifting positions to meet needs and dedicating time to
cross -training to help staff meet workload demands with existing
resources
Reviewing and streamlining processes to allow staff to keep up with
workload or address additional tasks.
2
4
6
5
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
Less
Service
More Service Questions
and Comments
1. Essential Public Services
2. Debt Management
................................................................................................................................................................................
3. Cyber Security/Business Continuity
0.4 N - Best Practice
0.1 Y - Federal/State
0.9 N - Best Practice
4. Financial Reporting/Audit/Account Administration $369,822
1.0 Y - Federal/State
5. Long -Range Financial Planning Model
$13,699
0.1
Y - City Code
6. Benefit Plan Management
$91,047
0.4 Y - Federal/State
7. Business Application Services
.................................................................................................................................................................................
8. Grants Administration & Accounting
.................................................................................................................................................................................
9. Mobility Services
0.3 Y - Federal/State
0.7 Y - Federal/State
..........................................................................................................................................
0.4 N - Best Practice
10. Data Analytics
$32,539
0.2 N - Best Practice
11. Emergency Application Services
$31,921
0.2 N - Best Practice
0.5
3
3
....2
1.5
1
1..
1
......................................................................
1
(Dot) Same
(Comment) Low cost high return?
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24
11
Working Draft Conten
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
Less More Service Questions
ervice and Comments
12. Professional Development & Training
$192,947
0.9 Y - 1
Ordinance/Resolution
13. Payroll & Benefit Administration
$325,231
1.6 Y - Federal/State
14. Council Legislative Support
$71,842
0.3 Y - Federal/State
15. Investments/Cash Management/Reporting
$40,114
0.2
Ordinance/Resolution
16. Civil Service Recruiting & Hiring
................................................................................................................................................................................
17. City Policy Development
................................................................................................................................................................................
18. Council Agenda/Meeting Functions
$158,249
$178,826
..............................................
$122,517
0.7 Y - Federal/State
0.7 Y - Federal/State
..........................................................................................................................................
0.8 Y - Federal/State
19. GIS (mapping)
$83,457
0.3
Y - City Code
20. Ordinance, Resolution and Code Development $63,564
0.4 Y - Federal/State
21. Budget/CIP Development
$109,042
0.6 Y - Federal/State
22. Labor & Employee Relations
$96,626
0.4 Y - Federal/State
23. Financial Reporting/Analysis for Departments
24. Policy Development/Compliance
............................................................................................................................................................
25. Classification & Compensation
0.5 Y - Federal/State
0.3 Y - Federal/State
...........................................................................................................................................................
0.2 Y -
Ordinance/Resolution
26. Capital Asset Accounting
$12,913
0.1 Y - Federal/State
27. Indirect Cost Allocation Admin
$6,560
0.0
Y - City Code
28. Mandatory Training
$2,718
0.0 Y - Federal/State
29. End -User Infrastructure Services
$524,987
0.6 N - Best Practice
30. Service Desk
$356,826
2.1 N - Best Practice
31. Network Infrastructure Services
$196,988
0.5 N - Best Practice
32. Risk Management
$861,572
0.1 Y - Federal/State
33. City Attorney Services
$525,987
0.0 Y - Federal/State
34. Recruiting and Hiring
$157,801
0.8
Y - City Code
35. Sales and Other Taxes
$451,131
2.6 Y - Federal/State
36. Equity
0.5 I 0.5
0.5 10.5
0.5 I 0.5
1
2
2
2
2.5
$125,110 0.6 Y - 3
Ordinance/Resolution
37. Administration
$3,942,031 8.2
Y - Federal/State
4
(Comment) Same
.:...............................................................................
(Dot) Same
(Comment) Contract serv?
1 dot underneath
1.5 I (Comment) Depends on which
taxes and total impact.
:...................................................................:.......................................................................................................................................
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24
12
Working Draft Content
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
38. Governmental & Regional Affairs
$313,495
1.5 Y - Federal/State
39. Accounts Payable
$288,772 1.7 Y - Federal/State
40. Legislative & Budget Oversight
$263,281
6.0 Y - Federal/State
41. Accts Receivable/Misc Billing/LID/etc.
$260,606 1.6 Y - Federal/State
42. Business System Management/Support
$176,922 0.6 Y - Federal/State
Less
Service
More Service Questions
and Comments
(Dot) Same
(Dot) Same
(Dot) Same
1 dot adjacent
(Dot) Same
1 dot adjacent
(Dot) Same
Total
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 13
Working Draft Content
Infrastructure Maintenance and Improvement
Priorities and Unfunded Needs
Resources dedicated to grant administration to maximize potential grant revenue
for the City
1
Investments in risk management and workplace health and safety
Operational support for capital investments such as facility and park maintenance 1
Dedicated sources of funding for capital projects
Resources dedicated to facility planning, maintenance and operations
Addressing physical and operational inequities, including enhanced language
access services, ADA transition planning, and barrier elimination
3
(Comment) This
should be private
development only
not city (ADA).
2
4
2
1
5
1
1
(Comment) Need cap
projects - how are they
to be funded matters
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
Less Service More Servic
Questions
and Comments
1. TIB Bus Stop/Streetscape
...............
2. Pothole and Litter Control
3. Park Restrooms Contract $83,976
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. Graffiti, vandalism & garbage $223,223
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Streetscapes/Median Landscape $92,400
...............
6. Parks Maintenance
...............
7. Trail Maintenance
8. Parks Facility Maintenance
$315,789
2.2
$1,155,174 0.4
0.0
1.5
0.8
$1,536,910 4.5
$274,310
$211,652
9. Grounds Maintenance -City Facilities $89,974
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Sidewalks $77,422
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
11. Facility Management & Improvement $2,011,828
12. Traffic Control Devices
13. Street Cleaning
14. Snow & Ice Control
0.6
1.6
0.7
0.4
7.8
N - Best Practice
....................................................................
N - Best Practice
................................................................
N - Best Practice
....................................................................
N - Best Practice
....................................................................
N - Best Practice
N - Best Practice
......................................................................
N - Best Practice
N - Best Practice
N - No Mandate
Y - City Code
N - Best Practice
2.7 Y - Federal/State
............................................................................................
0.8 Y - Ordinance/Resolution 1
1.0 Y - City Code
2.5
8.5
2
1.5
(Dot) Same
:.......... .......................................
8 I (Dot) Same
...5......................................................................... (Dot) Same
5
2
2.5
(Comment) Low cost - high
return infrastructure
(Dot) Same
:.................................................
(Dot) Same
(Comment) Need more data
on what's included in this.
(Dot) Same
(Dot) Same
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24
14
Working Draft Content
Program
Name
2024 Budget
2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
Less Service More Service Questions
and Comments
15. Video & Fiber
16. Budget/CIP Development
17. Mandatory Training
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
18. Grants Administration & Accounting
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
19. Professional Development & Training
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
20. Administration
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
21. Environmental Stewardship
22. Street Lighting
23. Projects & Capital Improvement Management
24. Minor Structural Repairs
$151,611
...............__...__..............
$132,729
...............__...__..............
$28,083
................_...._................
$140,834
.._.....................................
$23,383
0.9
0.7
0.1
0.8
0.1
$1,147,263 5.4
$880,566
$679,648
$40,329,210
$51,448
4.9
2.5
9.1
Y - City Code
Y - Federal/State
Y - Federal/State
Y - Federal/State
Y - Ordinance/Resolution 2
Y - Federal/State 2
Y - Ordinance/Resolution 2
Y - Ordinance/Resolution
N - Best Practice
0.4 N - Best Practice
0.5
1
1
2
2
1
0.5
(Dot) Same
(Dot) Same
(Dot) Same
(Comment) Need more data
on what's included in this.
(Dot) Same
$50,787,534 49.7
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24 15
Working Draft Content
Public Safety
Comments
■ How do we as a community want to define public safety?
■ We need restorative justice - programs for youth [2 dots on sticky note top corners]
■ State patrol should be on I-5/highway
■ Use of non -uniform personnel for some duties [1 dot plus additional comment "Yesl"]
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
Less
Service
More Service Questions
and Comments
1. Narcotics & Human Traffic Investigations
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2. Investigation of Felony and Juvenile Crimes
3. Community Risk Reduction
4. Professional Development & Training
5. Animal Control
...............
6. Homeless Encampment Response
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
7. Case Management
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
8. Emergency Preparedness & Response
9. Community Investment
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Police Patrol Services
11. Court Support Services
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
1 2. Valley Independent Investigative Team
13. Public Safety Plan
14. Community Policing Team
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
15. Police Support Operations
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Fire Services Contract
17. Evidence and Property Management
$443,453
6.3
11.4
0.0
1.3
$125,142 0.0
$46,618
.......................................................
$414,622
.......................................................
$640,853
$162,297
.......................................................
$9,039,888
$209,797
..............................................
$98,805
..............................................
$18,138
$973,842
..............................................
$1,201,183
.............................................................
$14,202,720
(Comment) Wow!
$332,542
0.2
2.3
1.1
1.0
36.1
1.4
0.5
0.1
0.0
N - Best Practice
Y - City Code
Ordinance/Resolution
Y-
Ordinance/Resolution
Y - City Code
...................................................................................................
N - Best Practice
Y - Federal/State 1
Y - Federal/State 1
N - Best Practice 1
Y - City Code
1
Y - Federal/State
............................................................................
N - Best Practice
Y - City Code
...................................................................
N - Best Practice
...........................................................................
N - Best Practice 1
.....................................................................
Not Applicable
2
2.2 Y - Federal/State
1
L
•
3
13
......................
2
2
2
1
(Comment) Keep fully
funded
(Comment) I second that!
(Comment) Same.
(Comment) Keep.
1 dot
(Comment) Need more on
what this giant $ means?
(Dot) Same
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24
16
Working Draft Content
Program
Name
2024 Budget 2024 FTEs Program
Mandate
Less
Service
More Service Questions
and Comments
18. Professional Standards
19. Prosecution Services
20. Health & Safety
21. Court Interpreter Program
..........................................................................................................................................
22. Accounts Payable
23. Fire Retiree Benefits
24. Risk Management
..........................................................................................................................................
25. Mandatory Training
26. Public Defense Program
27. Critical Incident Response
$323,553
...............................................
$155,231
$96,912
$73,864
...............................................
$1,000
........................................
$309,500
..........................
$365,664
...............................................
$551,850
..............................................
$448,184
...............................................
$394,697
1.6 Y - Federal/State
0.0 Y - Federal/State
0.3 Y - Federal/State
0.3 Y - Federal/State
0.0 Y - Federal/State
0.0 Not Applicable 1
......................................................................................................................................................................
0.0 Y - Federal/State 1
2.3 Y - Federal/State 1
0.1 Y - Federal/State 1
1.7 N - Best Practice
28. Traffic Enforcement & Crash Investigation Team $913,639 4.5
..........................................................................................................................................................................
29. Detention & Incarceration Services
30. Emergency Management Program
31. Civil Service Recruiting & Hiring
..................................................................................................................................................................
32. Administration
33. School Zone Safety Cameras
$1,123,782
$412,537
0.3
2.0
Y - Federal/State
.............................................................................
Y - Federal/State
Y - Federal/State
1.3 Y - Federal/State
..........................................................................................................................................
4.6 Y - Federal/State
3.0 N - Best Practice
1
1
1.5
2
2
2
2.5
3
0.5
0.5
1
(Dot) Same
(Dot) Same
(Dot) Same
1 dot
(Comment) 1 police or fire
(Comment) Police response
or fire? Who does this
(Comment) Federal? FEMA?
Grants?
(Comment) 1 ROI
(Comment) What is the
return on investment for this?
Financial Sustainability Plan Committee Observations on Programs and Services 1 /9/24
17