The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIS 2025-04-28 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee ❖ Jovita McConnell, Chair ❖ Mohamed Abdi ❖ Hannah Hedrick M C D Distribution: J. McConnell H. Hedrick P. Mayer G. Lerner (email) EETI ANCE UE T Share pkt pdf on SharePoint to A. Le, A. Youn M. McCormick NG LLED 0 LACK AGENDA OF A QUORUM MONDAY, APRIL 28, 2025 — 5:30 PM HYBRID MEETING — ONSITE AND VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE Room, 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA MS Teams: CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE MEETING Virtual Meeting - Members of the public may listen by dialing 1-253-292-9750 and entering conference ID 252508487# :e 1. PRESENTATIONS 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a) Turnover of Underground Stormwater Bypass Pipelines and Appurtenant Facilities Installed within Tukwila Right -of -Way (Kerry Murdock) b) Resolution to Surplus & Sell qty 2 Additional 2017 Ford Police Interceptors (Shawn Christie) c) Purchase Replacement Brush Chipper for Unit 2604 (Shawn Christie) d) 2024 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Study Update (David Baus) ended Action a) Forward to the 05/05/2025 Regular Consent Agenda b) Forward to the 05/05/2025 Regular Consent Agenda c) Forward to the 05/05/2025 Regular Consent Agenda d) Information only Pg. 1 Pg. 25 Pg. 31 Pg. 33 Next Scheduled Meeting: May 27, 2025 I} The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance. TO: FROM: BY: CC: DATE: SUBJECT: Thomas McLeod, Mayor Department of Co unity Development - Nora Gierloff AICP, Director Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee Pete Mayer, Interim Public Works Director Kerry Murdock, Development Engineer Mayor Thomas McLeod April 7th, 2025 Turnover of underground stormwater bypass pipelines and appurtenant facilities installed within Tukwila right-of-way ISSUE Accept the turnover of stormwater infrastructure improvements from Prologis-Exchange 3301 South Norfolk LLC. BACKGROUND Prologis-Exchange 3301 South Norfolk, LLC has completed installation of approximately 688 lateral feet of storm pipe in South Norfolk Street to connect the city storm system to the original point of connection just southwest of the Norfolk Street and Airport Way intersection. As conditions of Public Works permit PW22-0033, Prologis-Exchange has constructed storm drainage infrastructure within S. Norfolk St. to connect the existing city of Tukwila storm system to the existing storm stub. The storm system was routed through the Prologis site and with redevelopment, it was capped off. Now the city of Tukwila storm system needs to be reconnected to the original point of connection. This has been filed under the Bill of Sale as part of the city's turnover process. DISCUSSION The public improvements have been constructed to city standards and inspected by Public Works Project Inspectors and are ready for turnover. FISCAL IMPACT The value of the transferred improvements from Prologis-Exchange to the city totals $72,088 for the stormwater infrastructure constructed within S. Norfolk St. There will be no expense to the city for accepting the infrastructure other than normal expected maintenance. RECOMMENDATION City Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign the turnover documents and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the May 5th, 2024 Regular Meeting. Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 1 Title or Addressee Date Page 2 ATTACHMENTS Bill of Sale and as -built site plan Capital Asset Acquisition Form Material List Development Bulletin D3 Maintenance bond City Turnover Letter INFRASTRUCTURE • 688' of 18" PVC Storm Pipe • CB#1 Type 2- 48" Saddle Manhole Total Value: $72,088 NOTE: Prologis-Exchange Development Files are available at the Department of Community Development Permit Center. Phone: 206-433-1800 • Email: Mayor@TukwilaWA.gov • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 2 400 SURVEY INEPT...N. SHOWN.S 420 WrAEoI O AT B ,INE e5)1: PER:DOT COOT CONTROL POINT N0 13,12 WAS KID POSE. AN. LINE SEW. WO 0211.. POINT ..12 AND CO.% POINT NV GPI... RIS PROJECT IS ..88 PEP wWSDOT. W.,Ta CONT. . Po NT KO. HOW vas r a ). ASSESSOR'S RAKEL ouecwSK AND SITE ADE, (5r 3.30. NORFOLK it 9.9 ro: 5 NORFOLK 5 MEP 0.3230190. Knowwhat'sbeIOW. Call before you dig. FRONT/SIDE/PEAR NOTW..».�. PORTION Of SINS 11/1WIN CI, 5 .13111. FROINT ES NORFOLK s;mr,ov,. EEu 3>wm ENN «SORN INTRIOR S. RI: COVER SHEET FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF THE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AND 04, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E W.M., CITIES OF TUKWILA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON AIRPORT WAY SOUTH NOT AP.:LE B.G. SITE n. REORRIEN: NNE anuwa..,in uuA aouiwnrrr NGIN 9.011. .11. OF ST15 'WHIN G. OF SPLOPED OFFICE- W,REN.N6PORTION 5 S. :ACE KER 2000 S5 038 TFA / PROPOSED STORM BYPASS 525155 T 1, NORFOLK it 515 ESI3>'PAPewc NT<as GPOSS LOT AREA-a3,05F(02211„NORDl I. ,...wSNOL (.,wN BARN. SIN. ... COI... A KOPCON ...IC TNI.TATION WITH A DELL TAB. gni .THET FIF.I.p SOMA. A :N., DOW. SW ROPOTIC TOTAL STATION Ix, A DELL TAKE W. W.0 F.:11KARE, ANG A TTOPCON FS" MN Tr. mE+no Ni 0 (NIT :DIM. OBSERVED IN KE PR.. OF CONDO.N8 THE FIELDWORK, PER THE PA.TE OF THE FIPLO SI.. AN Va , i N. TRANSTMAL SURF.. D SOILS REPORT NOTES: SO. REPORT: BER1,1,0L,O,F,,,GEOT,EXENZLZGINEERINO SERVICES PREPARED BM GEOE.1 FERO INCIrk, NI UNION HILL RD, SIMIE O REDMOND, WA 98052 ET) 6626068 IT SHALL BE THE RESPONEIBILIV OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL PRNISIONS OF THE SOILS REPORT FOR THE SITE BE OBSERVED AND COMPLIED WITH DURING ALL PHASES OF THE SITE PREPARADON, GRADING. OP.ATICINS, r0.0.10, SLAB, AND PRONG REPORT D.ESE INFORMATION SHOWN TO .WHERENDRAWING5 OR WHICH REOTIIRL SHALL DC DROUGHT 50 AT 3N HE /ENER GINEER PER DETERMINATION A P REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ROI. ENGINEER SHAH PE TO OBSERVE P. APPROVE PIE EARTHWORK OPERATIONS AND TO VERT. F1FID CONDIPONS A WO PROCEED, IL,' ENGINEER SHALL SUDE. FIELD REPORTS C 501,ING IIIAT T. METHODS AND MATERIALS DF THE EARTHWORK OPERATIONS WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WAS A.P.R.TRAED TD HS/E SA s.Anun. Nn WORK n D r< Ro,. o nF S E cNn.ae oR cRno uc. r3E (s> wow: NN INDEX OF CIVIL SHEETS F. OF 9 SOMI1 NORFOLK STREET PLAN MORE RS OFSOW, NORFOLK MEE( PIA.. PRON. 9SOL iNORFOKMEET PLAN ARO PROFILE R7 OF 9 SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN RR 0,9 SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN PROP. PRORLE co SOUTH NORFO EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH DEVELOPER/OWNER SURVEYOR PAPGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC 022 OLL .25)u ENGINEER PHI 251-6222 LANDSCAPE ARCHRECT BARGPAUSEN CONSULTING ErCNEERS INC s ARCHITECT GEOTECH ORA, ARCHITECTS 2505 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 1.• SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98121 EAR 06) n e. UNION' 1,25 NE D. STIOE 250 A 95052 �:. t 255) es 603e UTILITY SOURCE NOTE- UTILRY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE DRAWN BY THE SURVEY DEPARTMENT FROM BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, SEWER CARDS, EXISTING PLANS AND BASE MAPS FROM CITY PLAN VAULT_ w RECORD DRA NG COT. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION NOTES ALT WORK IN ROADWAYS S11. MEET TMC 1125 2018 AND THE FOLLOWING' A PRIOR TO ANY ACTIVITY IN RICK -OF -VW THE PERMIT. SPA. PRO.: THE CITY A TRAFFIC CONTR. roR REVIEW ANO APPROVAL THE TRAFFIC CONTR. RAN SHAI I INCLUDE THE LOCATION ADDRESS AND DESCRIPTION 01 TRAFFIC FLOM THE WORK B WORN ...AIRING LANE CLOSURES MUST BE Br PER. ONLY FROM THE THIPD BANE CLOSURES THE TUKWILA URBAN CENTER C FIRE, PEDESTRIAN. A. VEDIC.. ACCESS TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ALL PIAES, EXCEPT WHEN PERMITTE HAS PERMISSION FROM THE PM DING OWNER AND THE DIRECTOR 10 CLOSE AN ACCESS D ALI ROADWAYS DE KEPI EPEE OD DIRT AND D.R. USING SI., SWEEPERS USE OF WATER TRUCKS FOR CLEANING ROADWAYS HOUR, PREAPPM.AL FROM THE DIRECTOR E INSTALL STEEL PLATES OVER ANY TRENCH ANY TIME 'RORK IS STOPPED AND 11. TRENCH IS LEFT OPEN LEGEND: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FILL, RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING PERMITS FROM TOLE WASHITA... STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR RET.... AND REPLACING OkS AFFECTED SY CONSTRUCTION MUST BE REGISTERED 5AND SURVEYOR APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS TO REMOVE LETONUMENTS MAY BE OBTAINED THE WASHINGTON STATE. DEPARTMENT OF NATURA5 RESOURCES, 0 B ACTH„ THEIR O re N TELEPHONE (.OY) 909-1190. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NAT.. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY E 1111 WASHINGTON s,ROF POSE RESOURCES UPON COMPI,TION Or CON...CT., ALL MONUMENTS DISPLACE. R.OVED, OR DES ROYED SHALL HE REPLACED HY A REGISTER. LA. SURVEYOR, AT THE COST AND . LHE Or THE CONTRACTOR, PURSUANT TO THESE REGULATION, THE RESPONSIBIll. Or CONTRACTOR UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE! CAUTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERI.I. THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, A. ,P1H Or ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THE. P,NS OR NOT BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES A. SUMEYING. THE HORRONML AND VERTICAL TON PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL NOME CALLING MR. LOCATE 1.-8 0.2,5555 A. THEN POTHOLING ALL OE THE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS Or NEW EMIL. CROSSINGS TO PHYSICAL, VERI, WHETHER OR NOT CONELICTS EXIST LOC DONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON INESE PLANS MRE BASED UPON TILE UNV ROD PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION IF CONFLICTS SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT HAROHALISEN CONSULTING ...PS, INC TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION SURVEY MONUMENT EX POWER VAULT Ex. LUMINAIRE (wu.) EX L.OT LIGHT EX POWER POLE EX JUNCTION BOX EX PAT. .SIN (AD) _a.CATCH P.IN (.a) TYPE EX SANITARY SELVER MANHOLE EX CAS METEP EX OAS AL, WATER VALVE (.) Prir RA (EH) EMIL BOX EX WATEP METER Er SIGN EX SANITARY SEINER LINE EX STORM DRAIN,. LINE EX POWER UNDER..IND EX POWER OVERHEAD T. FENCE EX WOOD FENCE PROPOSED .P.S 11 CATCH BASIN PROPOSED TYPE, I CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN ELOTV ARROW PROPOSED STOI. DRAINAGE LI. PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LI. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEAN., PROPOSED ,NITARY SERER PROPOSED RATE.. PROPOSED WATER VALVE PROPOSED 90' BE. PROPOSED CONCRETE BLOCKING PROPOSED SPOT RPM.. EXIST., SPOT ELEVATIONS PROPOSED CONTOURS EXIST. CONTOURS PROP.. CONCRETE PROPOSED 00 T 1.29/2.SEP PEVISED STORM DESIGN BOW Scoler Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1821572nd Avenue South Kent, WA96032 425251.6222 hsrgh...n Vm For PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA Title, COVER SHEET FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY Job Number 18182 Sbeet R1 O(9_. 3 R5 w cc co 0 cc 0 8 CO FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS OVERVIEW RECORD DRA FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF THE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AND 04, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E W.M. CITIES OF TUKWILA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON AIRPORT WAY SOUTH - PROPOSED STORM BY ASS NG'11[Eft.D115'NARTIONA'rlINDRE INSUR.CE DOW. CIMITMENT HO 20.32.536.16 0.41. S.M. 78, .16 AT 5,06 AN) PAK., A INAT OF 111.10..0145 DONATION TAM WATIA 5.11014S, AND 4, TOWNSHIP 23 MOW RAM 4 rv, AT. WNW.. 960 1 IN SAO SUWON ,, AND or IFIE AMMON. SEATTLE-Ern AND NMI AV" AZIAIT ""AMA"1:01111;j1":""a2:7,7 .Zor"" 4i,..1,66 ATHE CENTERLINES OE SOUTH GOMM SIP. MP IrlE"./TRATIM AMATASTITZGIVW AAAA 'A' AAA "A"AkA 'AAAAAA'AA AAAAAAA THENCE SOUM 8.1." MESE AL01. THE CNIERLINE Or SAID SOOTH POPE. STREET. 32.53 MEW IIIIEBtIrs'XI;ETEIMISFEE2 IIIMStltrrXEmlnrEEITIrisTtl"tZtErR7ItgEntlx SOIM, ChNER OF CDEVE BEMS MTH 3.1 0. WEST, 48 00 rEET, AND TH5 WM POINT CAT BEGIMINQ :NUNN 21'2.39" MD, ATMO WESEM .P.1, 1.8 OT FEET T. POINT WIDENM IN .0 AIPPOPT TIEN. $01.1 5.0.1.16 WONG 5A0 NORM. 35. RV 10 A MINT N SAO WON THE CENT. OF ZECIACETOAIT'^21.7:ATE;ISTASAAINAAM:ILEASTIND AN AM OF A COM MAND SAID RAMS OP 5.90. AN ARO MM. OF 509. FEET TO A MINT Or WIDEN. IN SAID AIRPORT SOUM THENCE NORTH 2.13, WEST. A.0 MARGIN. MO FEET, THENOE SOUTIT 11.011.7, ALONG MID MORM, 221 GO FEEL 10 A P.. WINNE. IN SAID MM. WAY SOU. THENCE N.TH 280 359" TED 300 FEET TO A POINT C. CUM IN SAID MARGIN, ME CENTERLINE Or WHICH BEMS NOM 9,90069" WEST E22 FER THENCE SOLITKRIT . WMTER10 ALONG COM AND MAKIN, AN NSW: h. 10 A MN1 ON RAMIE OF 60EINC ACCESS ROAM THEME SOUTT1 MT, AWN, SAID MARGIN, 2 FEET, THENCE SO. 8.602" ALONG SAW MEM. 1.0 92 FEET TO A POIM OF Or A 10,80 .1 PAM. TRIME TO T. MTh IN MID 31.1N, ANAAMVATAMAREAAATAITP AGARAMASNIATI7NAAAL "'" AA" AAA'AA 1"" 'AA A AAAA 'AAA"' AA 'A TM. NORM hOM.D NOPTHEASh. 222.. HET A POIM OF COPVAIME OF A TEM .14 roar 19.1. WIMP. 'ME LER THENCE N.1.10 /001.. CU. AND WM, AN ARC DISMCE Or 264 44 PIM, THENCE CONTINUING WONG MRTITEASMIS MARGIN OF FAD WIRMAL MP, NORM 2.36,6MED 42.4 OF 11 5011.200 Ep. OF 5/390 OMEN. TOT A5 lg..) PAD 10.40E GOWNWIENT.7 ASV131:0A10990A1636 TOrSAAROVOAINTAAnrIAACT8 MAI= WIT"SA?1,1=1ATNATAGWT THENCE N.113 0,8" 1115' WEST, hONG .D WESTER, BOUNDARY TM. 22.6 15 FEE TO INE SWIM LIE OF ShD TIMMY GROWS MENTION MND MTh THENCE SWIM 8.50.25...13 WONC .G SOL. LINE, 152 WSW TO THE WEST LINE CP ShO SEC. 3, THENCE SWIM 0,20120 .1, ALONG WEST LIM 1.39 2IFEEM loplEMNXZW22",,13,9E5,1 TO A MINT WHICH BEARS SOUTIT 89'59 12' L3159 MOO FED FR. THE EASTER, LIAROIN THENCE N.TH 2.33.3.16" N'EST 181. FEET. THEME N.I1 6.0.5" 1.1 1.16 EEO TO ME MM. MARGIN OF DST MRCP. WAY 5.1111, ruzywar.oraAtzmrzeagT,901%7,E,TIEnCEOARMIrEnt:TH COM, ...NG NJ 53.220, RECORDS Or KING DOUNT. WASWIMON/ THENCE 3.7„6001.1. EAST. ALO. SAID 900INERIE hAROIN. 962,.,09 FED TO MOM 0.30.3%, 0,/ , 'Ar‘c4 rxr.,,F=".0''i'lAWANOtCATAA A " AA"' AAA" A 'AA " " AAAA. TIMM, 11.11 5.1 I." EAST, AI.O.MAID RAMIN, .0.23 Rh TO TIM MOT WM". BEGINN. ATATRGAGAGATWAI"ATTA9TnAlATWWWITUTIGAIMRAOIAALIGAARANTIFT'hATATA TAANAW"UALArA rEAA0A17. //,Wr 9"A"AAA'A WOINNITIC AT THE NOMMEST CORNER OF 1131E SOMM.0310.FIER 01 INE MAW.. SAIP SECIMN 3. AOAFAAflt "NT s"" THEME SOLINT 5.012.51.0. IhRTHERLY MR. 20351 1.921 TO AN INTEMECTIN WW1 A MG 191./1 213 FEW WESMET. REASTIRED AT NIGHT ANN. TO AND PA.. EMI THE 13/51.3T RAM. 0, GAID MONO ELECTRIC COMP. RICIMOTWAT, Inenr.99GrIPPT AZOV: Marra "AA' AAAA AA A A"' AAA" 'AAAAA AA"" "A"'"A AAA' THENCE SM. 88190'52" EAST 1.1002 FEET TO ME TREE PORTI OF DEMNINC/ 190.1. WIM 63019-.1.0. MM.. R. MAK. RECORDED M. RECO.. r,e, 3885856 AND 3885850 REDOPOS OF Rah C011. WASHINGION. PARCEL P-1 THAT ROMON OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, M.SHIP 23 NORM RANGE 9 W 31 1014, PARCEL BM, THAT P.M OF GOVEMAIENT LO1 8, SECTICh 0 TOWN. 23 NOPTH. RANGE 4 .1. 11.19, IN KT. COGM, WAMPOTONMESCRIBED AS CM., !MITA ISIEIEWZZE3 OE 5A. OG11.1.0NT K AT A MIT. 9311. 15 NORM Ohl.. MD 500 FROM TIE THENCE NORTH OM... 15. FEET; THEME WEST h0 rEET, NOM OR LESS. THE NONTIMWTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO 1 AS NOW ESTABLIMED, G MINCE SWAM., AMG . MAD LINE 205 hET MOPE OP 4ESS 10 A ROM 6.913 BEAM NO. 89 20 . WEST FPO/ ME POINT OF ...NG . / Nt" 'FENCE SOL. WI 50 641 E. RAMILEL WITH ME SWITH 1. OE MID GMERNAMIT 3. 8 255 EMT ROK . 1.5.5 TO Fi3 s"Tr.. TWEE hi Ltd 131AT GO.. OF 5..116191 101 8 SECDOP 4 1.101213 29 1.12131 PARCE 4 EAST VI B IN KIM C.. A. m. 6-- 0 0hINNING ON 19. h. 1 IGE OP MP, 00.141... ID AT A P.NT MU . 0.11 621 24" EART 352. RIM ERN TIE MM.. CORN. h.. THWCE NOM, 0 21 24 EAST MOM SATD MST . 1M 65 FEET M.. A / THENCE ME WED TO ME NORMEASTERLY TIM OF .131.1 STATE MM. NO I h ESTAMSHES BY GM TO TM SThE OF WASHITI.ON RECOESED ME, RECORDING MAW. 3010535 IN WM C., WASHINGTON OF IMINNIK, THENCE FE., ROM ..G. Or BEG.. _ . EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH- RA6,66 , A DIAT PORTION 0.071014 4, M.. 23 NOREI, ROM 4 MD W31, IN KING 509. hASHINOTON DESCRIBED A5 KOTNNINO AT WE INTERSECTION OF ME SWOP . OF THE TWO. GROWS SOWN WM DIM WI.. EAST LINE OF WO S.. 0 THENCE SOUM MTh SAID EAST liNE FEET 10 THE rm- POPO OF M.P. TIMM SOOT WEST 2000 FEET, THENCE N.TH IEST 4.01 FEET TO ME EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST ORM, SOUTH. TIEN. NORTH 2.9.16.51 AL. SAID BARGE/ 1, A MINE 1190. KAM NORM GC 550. WEST Mk MP MGR DECITINM THENCE SOU. 8.58 LAST TO TTIE TRUE MINT OF PECANING ITMCEL G 11/1.0.14 GE SLUM 9, TOMSTIP 23 NORM RANGE 4 EAST, NM, ESCRIPED AS ROLLO. w trFOLINGZ94,E,INIEPSECTION OF SOUTH OF TIRO. OEM'S DOMTIM .140 0.9 ICH ME MT WE THENCE MUM 3.13. WM WOK AM 605MINP 1,7 23 F. THENCE N.TH MM. WED TO A POINT WHICH BEAM SOU. 8.66 GM FED FROM THE E/STERM MAKIN OF E. 1/A9,11. WAY S... ME TRUE POINT OF KOWNING, THENCE NORTH 2.999.16,51 181 29 FEE. THEM NORTH MGM. 1.1 .09 rrs TO SAID MTERLY 31.61N, MICE,SNOEITch; /29av, ALMG EASTERLY TO A POINT .951 8EAPS NO. 8058,2" WEST FROT9 THE IFIENCE EAST 1.06 FEET TO DIE INUE POINT WW141411. SITU. IN TIE COG. OF .10, SIM/ OF aofe •-...,-.- .09.020 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc, ,K821enZ7,ZrAld Avenue South 425257.6222 trarphainenoom PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA Title, FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS OVERVIEW FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY Job Number 18182 R2 „ 9 4 0+00 Pate Py V29/22 CEP Scale- SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF THE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AND 04, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E W.M., CITIES OF TUKWILA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON 1+00 S. NORFOLK ST. Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1821572nd Avenue South Kent, WA98032 425251.6222 berehausen.eam 2+00 RECORD DRAWING N67.07.19.EsozozJ F0 PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA Title, SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY Job tJurroer 18182 Sboot R3o,9 5 NOTE THE STOR5h LiNC S,ALL BC OWNED MID SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF THE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AND 04, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E W.M., CITIES OF TUKWILA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON RECORD DRAWING 3+00 1 ¢1 • kr. 4+00 45.00 1,16707'191 902.02' S. NORFOLK ST N67'0 '191 902.02' 7 nose ey CIA JEP Gneckea wv,o.oe o�< 9299292 Scale - Vertical El Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc, 1821572nd Avenue South Kent, WA98032 425251.6222 bergheulen.com Fa'' PROLOGS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA Title, SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY Job Number 18182 R4 Sbeet 6 Dote BY Rev ion NOTE: MANTA,. BY THE CITY OF TU.. 35 30 zsQl 20 1 0 Wr JEF 6+00 SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF THE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AND 04, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E W.M., CITIES OF TUKWILA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON TYP£ 2-48" SADDLE MH W/ STAND GRATE Riv = 1rc IE nezpa-E 1.4 INSMIL SAD BYPASS ANwND NIPINIAI.1, BY i4L CV ,: TUKWILA) EBarghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1921572nd Avenue South Kent, WA99032 425.251.(Q22 Wrghausen.com 7+01 GR. AND-1 OVEPLAY OF For: PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA RECORD DRAWING Title, SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY Job Number 18182 Sheet R5 9 7 JO 35 30 E 25 ei 1117113 THE STONY %Pa OE HMO MO APPITAINED fiT THE Off OF TIRO.. SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A POAT1ON OF TIE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AM) 04, TOWN23N, RANCE 4E W14., CITES OF TUICWIA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASFIN3TON 3011 ,3 15 i 5 11 o STA'S'ASSEJESAND DIDEWALK — FTA L, 7+75,56 PVI STA - 8+00,5 PVI ELEA - 16.S3 PVI REV = 16.84 PA STA P., 6+56.72 PA ELEV , AAA VA, PVC, SP PAAP5g. 100 Pi 1.—AHL----11BIIE- 457 18. PVC SO 0 8+00 AECAPE OF WAY EX •-2. GRIND MO MIK& ockrzo/ocu,o OF PROPOSED MU WE Rir..,17 58 MA, LEFT TURN we S NORFOLK ST 9+00 35 I< HOOT OA WAS RECORD DRAWING No Cke, NP, Nt21/22,.„ JEP REVISED STORM DESION EBarghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc 1821572nd Avenue South Kent, WA98032 425251.6222 barghaumn.com For' PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA Title; SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY Job Number 18182 R6 „ 9 8 35 30 25 ¢r 20 1 15 1- 1°=10' NUM THE S019SE OWED Ae0 98 ISSMAN80 EO SE 111EWL OW OF nAOnw SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF TIE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AM) 04, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E WM, CITES OF TUCWLA MD SEATTLE, KIND COUNTY WA9I11,10FON RECORD DRAWING 10+00 i ai 1M PVC LE SP.E:Oet e STA 10+83.45, 2211,. PO' IN NPN t' (SEALED) 201 I v. I s, et- (SEAtLO) 14400 S NORFOLK ST EX 151 SD EX 18. SD EX GAS LINE 1 ' 1 25 ;rjj 20 1 1 i 1 10 1� s 124 i§ 0 Date ey Cka. Appr JEP Scale Horfrontal Vertical 0 Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1821572nd Avenue South Kent, WA98032 425251.6222 beryMwnmm For' PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA Title SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY Jab Number 18182 Sheet R7 a, 9 9 No 35 1"-10' P. SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF TIE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SECTIONS 03 AM) 04, TOWNSIP 23N, RANGE 4E WM, CITES OF TUCWLA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WA9I IINOTON RECORD DRAWING PVI Sit, = ,?+08-Ji ! rPVI ELEV 1851 PVI ?A = 12+1821 YY.. /"PVI ELF.v r. 1838 25 ge PVI STA N.12+2001 - PVI ELEV = 1005 15 ! ;, S NORFOLK ST Pvl sr = 11+62.e8 PVI EL, = Fx P 58550E —.. Date e w+s,ANo PO GUSE ADX Sr EX WC., RAS10 AND 04,1E er LAd. JEP REVISED STORM DESIGN Horizontal Vertcal 00 ,wne wra II. ir BOSTOIX GAS LINE E�. EX 18" POWFR 00 Rall2/sw ( i ' / / / t r / / 1 Ld Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc 1821572nd Avenue South Kent, WA98032 425251.6222 beryMwnmm EX P01,12 LINE 010A, SINK FENCE For' PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA ex saws rnor (31 Title SOUTH NORFOLK STREET PLAN AND PROFILE FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 35 30 25 5 0 0 10 s Jab Number 18182 Sheet R8a(9 10 CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY A PORTION OF THE NW AND NE 1/4 OF SEC11ONS 03 AND 04, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 4E W.M., CITIES OF TUKWILA AND SEATTLE, KING COUNTY WASHINGTON .4652644.K.ONIKlaidgaREVEKliKKOVY /27/ Qs,/orschTh.c.h 7:=MTVEN11 MR IS" MIN TRAIN 1,1AX SEWER SYSTENI: r..11,10E.LOW BO MATZMIRDRAIN. MOE OIANI PIPF.5.1, iNSIDE PIPES 78,1,0 LARGER1 ONSIDE DAM N91g1 REFER TORS,. FORME...NT P.0,11,10. 9. PAVED FREW BACKFitt WITH 5/0,....113.U.SHED ROCK ,CSTC PER NISCOT 9,01,3”. S. MI.. AREA, WITH t.0.71.1.ATERIAL APPRO., THE ENGINMAOR City of Tukwila UTLITY TRENCH 1,KAE, kOZIMZ.,,,,Irr= fteACHB Ff. UNPAVED AREAS:1.01U MAMMAL APPROVED BY 'ME ENGINEER OR CRUSHED M.( W5007 UTILITY ADJUSTMENT City Of I Tukwila RECORD DRA VING Sate F,V,101, 9/29/22 DKP REVISED STORM IJKSIGN 1"oriz,nt. Barghausen Consulting Englnitors, Inc. 18295 72nd Avenue South Kent WA 98032 425251E122 bergheuien.orn For PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY 3601 S. NORFOLK STREET SEATTLE, WA TtI CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS FOR PROLOGIS EMERALD GATEWAY J. Number 18182 Sheet R9 . 9 11 BILL OF SALE For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, Prologis-Exchange 3301 South Norfolk LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the state of Delaware ("Owner"), does hereby grant, bargain, transfer, sell, assign, convey, and deliver to the City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation ("Grantee"), certain underground storm bypass pipelines and appurtenant facilities installed within the Grantee's right of way, as further described on Exhibit A ("Improvements"), to have and to hold the same for the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. Owner hereby covenants that they are the lawful owner of said Improvements; that the same is free from all encumbrances; that all bills for labor and material associated with the same have been paid; that it has the right to sell the same as aforesaid; and that it will warrant and defend the same against the claims and demands of all persons with respect to the foregoing covenants and will pay any costs, including reasonable attorney fees incurred by Grantee, arising out of any such claim or demand. The Improvements are hereby conveyed in consideration of the agreement of Grantee, for itself, its successors and assigns, to accept ownership of the Improvements and to maintain the same as provided for in applicable city ordinances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner has executed this Bill of Sale this day of , 2025. OWNER: PROLOGIS-EXCHANGE 3301 SOUTH NORFOLK LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: PROLOGIS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, its sole member By: PROLOGIS, INC., a Maryland corporation, its general partner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF KING By: Jake Maxwell, Vice President I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jake Maxwell is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice President of PROLOGIS, INC., a Maryland corporation, as the general partner of PROLOGIS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, as the sole member of PROLOGIS-EXCHANGE 3301 SOUTH NORFOLK LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: , 2025. Notary Public for the State of Washington residing in (City) (State) Print name: Commission expires: 13 CITY OF TUKWILA, a Washington municipal corporation By: Title: Attest/Authenticated: City Clerk Approved As To Form by City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day, this record was acknowledged before me by , known to me to be the of the City of Tukwila, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing document, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act for the purposes described herein. DATED December , 2025. Name: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the state of Washington, residing at My commission expires: 14 EXHIBIT A PW22-0033 APPROVED PLAN SET SHEETS R1-R9 15 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL ASSET ACQUISTION FORM INSTRUCTIONS. The Owner or Owner's Representative completes this form for transfer of a capital item to the City. The City Clerk processes the form. TRANSACTION. 1. 0 DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT Name: Council Action Dated: 2. El BILL OF SALE Total Construction Cost of Capital Asset: $ $72,088 Grantor: Grantee: 3. 0 OTHER Description: ASSET DESCRIPTION. [ ] Water El Sewer E✓ Storm © Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk 0 Other 688 LF of Storm pipe and one type 2 -48" catch basin with saddle manhole. I certify that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and accurate. Signature — Department Head Date I hereby approve the acceptance of the named asset(s) on behalf of the City. Mayor Date Note: Assets over $40,000 in value require Council action and approval. By council action at a council meeting dated 20 U, the above assets were accepted. Council President ATTEST: City Clerk Date Date DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED: Turnover Request Letter Title Report n Bill of Sale n Record Drawings n Easements E Material List • ROW dedicat on El Other: DISTRIBUTION LIST: II City Clerk n Utility Asset Acctg. Maint. Div 1 Utility 16 PROJECT NAME: Proloais Emerald Gateway Storm Bypass PERMIT NO: PW22-0033 MATERIAL LIST DESCRIPTION (length, size, material & type) QUANTITY AVERAGE UNIT COST DATE INSTALLED SERVICE LIFE TOTAL (YRS) ORIGINAL COST TOTAL DEPRECIATION PER YEAR ACCUMLATED DEPRECIATION 688 LF of 18" PVC Storm line 688 $101 05/01/2023 40 $69,488 $1,737.2 $3474.4 CB#1 Type 2- 48" Saddle Manhole 1 $2,600 05/01/2023 40 $2,600 $65 $130 TOTAL COSTS: $72,088 SIGNED: DATED: 3/10/2025 17 CITY OF TUKWILA Public Works Department 206-433-0179 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN D3 TURNOVER PROCESS Permit Number Applicant/Owner Project Address Parcel Number(s) Date Submitted TURNOVER PROCESS AND DOCUMENT DESCRIPTIONS For turnover of privately built infrastructure to the City of Tukwila, the Owner, or the Owner's authorized agent, submits a completed turnover packet to Public Works 3 weeks before requesting Public Works final inspection. Using the enclosed City of Tukwila forms, provided for your convenience, will help ensure the turnover submittal is complete. Final Inspection will not be scheduled until Public Works receives the turnover submittal. Once the Public Works Department receives the turnover submittal, the Department reviews the submittal for completeness and accuracy. Public Works may request additional information or corrections to the submitted documents. Generally, the review will not hold up Final Inspection. When all the paper work is complete, the Public Works Director presents the request for turnover to the City Council. The acceptance process can take 2-6 weeks. Following acceptance, the City Clerk records the infrastructure documentation. If you have any questions regarding completion of these documents, please contact the Public Works Permit Technician at 206-433-0179. Approved 11/1999 18 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN D3 TURNOVER PROCESS DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION TURNOVER LETTER Purpose: Provides formal request to the City to accept constructed infrastructure and any related rights -of -way and easements as public. Description: A letter addressed to the City of Tukwila requesting acceptance of constructed infrastructure. The letter includes a brief description of the infrastructure and reasons for turnover, for example, public infrastructure required due to development, and description of turnover paperwork being submitted. RECORD DRAWINGS, AS -BUILT PLANS, & VICINITY MAP Purpose: Provides permanent record for City Engineering and Maintenance Divisions. Used by Mayor/Utilities Committee and Council when reviewing the request for turnover. Description: Submit Record Drawing and As -built plans to Public Works on 3.5 diskette in AutoCAD and on 24" x 36 " mylar sheets drawn to scale, with the following inclusions: • Information on record drawings including: locations of existing and abandoned -in -place components, dimensions, slopes, materials, inverts, distances, finished grades and capped utilities • Construction Notes applicable to components of system • Easements • Rights -of -way • Stamped Engineer block with signature BILL OF SALE Purpose: Provides legal instrument for transferring infrastructure and easements/rights-of-way from the Owner to the City. Description: A brief summary of the installed system and attached legal descriptions of easements and rights -of -way. Bill of Sale form enclosed. Note: Documents will be recorded at King County Records. Please ensure all text and signatures are within a 1" margins on all four sides. 2 19 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN D3 TURNOVER PROCESS CAPITAL ASSETS ACQUISITION FORM Purpose: Processing acceptance and signoff of infrastructure by Public Works/ Administration/Council/Finance. Description: A brief summary of all components installed or constructed and totals construction cost. Capital Asset Acquisition form enclosed. Note: State law requires assets acquired from a special service district to be transferred by ordinance. MATERIAL LIST/INFRASTRUCTURE SPREADSHEET Purpose: Provides complete description and constructed value of infrastructure. The Finance Department uses this to record value of City property. Description: A spreadsheet, which shows a description of each component of the system, the actual constructed cost for each component and the total construction, cost for the system. Spreadsheet must be signed and dated by Owner or authorized agent. Material List form enclosed. EASEMENTS Purpose: Grants City the right to operate, maintain, repair or reconstruct transferred infrastructure on private property. Description: Easement Form and two exhibits. The completed Easement Form must be signed, dated and notarized. The two exhibits are: Exhibit A, a written legal description of the easement and Exhibit B, a schematic plan (8-1/2 X 11) of the easement in relation to the project. Easement (Corporate Form) form enclosed. Note: Documents will be recorded at King County Records. Please ensure all text and signatures are within a 1" margins on all four sides. 3 20 DEVELOPMENT BULLETIN D3 TURNOVER PROCESS DEDICATION OF RIGHT OF WAY Purpose: Grants right of way to the City for the purpose of road classification. Description: Right of way Form and two exhibits. The completed right of way form must be signed, dated and notarized. The two exhibits are: Exhibit A, a written legal description of the Right of Way and Exhibit B, a schematic plan (8-1/2 x11) of the right of way in relation to the project. Dedication of Right-of-way form enclosed. Note: Documents will be recorded at King County Records. Please ensure all text and signatures are within a 1" margins on all four sides. MAINTENANCE BOND Purpose: Security that contractor will maintain and repair constructed infrastructure for a 2-year period. Maintenance Bond provides warranty. Description: Completed Maintenance Bond must be signed and dated. The City determines the bond amount and the Owner may secure the bond by submitting the completed and signed Maintenance Bond Form or by Assignment of Funds. Maintenance Bond Surety Agreement enclosed. 4 21 Bond No: TBD Maintenance Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we PROLOGIS-EXCHANGE 3301 SOUTH NORFOLK LLC called Principal, as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Illinois , hereinafter are held and firmly bound unto City of Tukwila hereinafter I d Surety, as Surety, hereinafter called Obligee in the sum of Ninety Three Thousand Three Hundred Fifteen Dollars and 60/100 ($93,315 60) DOLLARS, lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said Obligee, or its successors or assigns, to the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we do bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. SIGNED, sealed and dated this TBD day of WHEREAS, the Principal entered into a contract with the said Obligee, dated for Emerald Gateway Storm Bypass - Public Works Permit# PW22-0033 September 8, 2022 and, WHEREAS, the Obligee requires that these presents be executed on or before the final completion and acceptance of said contract and WHEREAS, said contract was completed and accepted on the TBD day of NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the Principal shall remedy, without cost to the Obligee, any defects which may develop during a period of joi ) one year from the date of completion and acceptance of the work performed under the contract, caused by defective or inferior materials or workmanship, then this obligation shall be void: otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. ATTEST: """"PLEASE SEE ATTACHED CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR THE SURETY CON 01072860If PROLOGIS- EXCHANGE 3301 SOUTH NORFOLK LLC a Delaware limited liability company By: Authorized Person By: [Name, Title] of Prologis, Inc., a Maryland corporation FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND By Tanya Chinchilla , Attorney -in -Fact 22 0� Kerry Murdock Development Engineer City ufTukwila Department ufPublic Works 6300SouthoontorBoulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, VVA88188 RE: City Turnover Letter Public Works Permit Application Number PVV22-0033 Emerald Gateway -3301 South Norfolk Street Our Job No. 18182 Dear Kerry: The work associated with permit number PVV22-0033 has been completed. The work was inspected and as -built to ensure that it meets or exceeds all db/, state and federal requirements The installed infrastructure is ready to turn over ownership to the city of Tukwila. This work includes the installation of approximately 688'of18^ PVC storm line and astorm manhole. If you have questions or need additional informaUon, please do not hesitate to contact ma at this office. Thank you. James E.PuUkcinn Senior Civil Project Manager Jp/jd/yg 18182o.065dnox eno: As Noted 8AgGnAUSEwCONSULTING EmG|mEERS,INC. /azarzmmAVENUE SOUTH xswTvwA98032 anxwcnOpnccS: Tumwm'cu.ww xLAwxrnpALLS.uu uuwGaexcn.cA nussv/us.cx sxwo/sc4cA barghouoen.com 23 24 0' d Thomas McLeod, Mayor Public Works Department - Pete Mayer, Interim Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure FROM: Pete Mayer, Interim Public Works Director BY: Shawn Christie, Fleet & Facilities Manager Garron Herdt, Fleet Superintendent CC: Mayor McLeod DATE: April 25, 2025 SUBJECT: Resolution to Surplus & Sell city 2 additional 2017 Ford Police Interceptors ISSUE Approve Resolution to surplus two (2) additional 2017 Ford Police Interceptor Utility SUVs no longer needed by the City and authorize the sale to Skagit Valley College under the authority granted with RCW 35A.11.010. ANALYSIS Both police patrol vehicles have served the City for 8 years surpassing their planned 5-year life cycle and both have been replaced under the regular budgeted annual Fleet Replacement Program. Skagit Valley College was established in 1990. The SVC PRLEA is one of six accredited academies nationwide that meets the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's standards for commissioning of seasonal Park Rangers for Level II entry law enforcement roles for the National Park Service (NPS) and other federal agencies. In addition, the academy meets the entry-level law enforcement requirements for full-time law enforcement positions with any Washington State law enforcement agency for one year from the graduation date, as well as many other state, county, and city park agencies. Washington State's Criminal Justice Training Commission also recognizes the academy training as satisfying the requirement for Law Enforcement Reserve Officer status. FISCAL IMPACT Public auction venues of outfitted police vehicles require extensive fleet shop time to remove components such as the lighting and all agency decals. Selling these vehicles to Skagit Valley College provides a savings for the City by eliminating the majority of the fleet decommissioning process. Both vehicles are fully depreciated and are currently valued at $9,000, established by analyzing past auction revenue for similar vehicle make and model. Revenue generated from the surplus process is returned to the 501 Fleet Equipment Rental fund which originated the purchase. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to approve the Resolution declaring the 2 Police Interceptors, estimated value at $9,000, as surplus and authorize their sale, and to consider this item on the Consent Agenda for the May 5, 2025 Regular Council Meeting. Attachments: Draft Resolution, Exhibit A Surplus Equipment List, Exhibit B Surplus Equipment Photos Fleet & Facility Services • 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98168 • 206-431-0166 Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 25 TOTAL PD PATROL PD PATROL PD010220 PD010220 2025 FLEET SURPLUS (Skagit Valley College) - Exhibit A PATROL, FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR BLACK/ UTILITY SUV AWD WHITE PATROL, FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR BLACK/ UTILITY SUV AWD WHITE FM5K8AR4HGB41230 1 FM5K8AR2HGD93770 62527D 93,300 62528D 88,449 $4,500 $4,500 SKAGIT VALLEY 2025 COLLEGE SKAGIT VALLEY 2025 COLLEGE https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/publicworks/fleet/Surplus/SURPLUS 2025/2025 SURPLUS LISTING 26 Pg 1 of 1 I 4/22/2025 Exhibit B 2025 Fleet Surplus (Skagit Valley College) Unit 1759, 2017 FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR UTILITY SUV AWD, License 62527D, VIN 1FM5K8AR4HGB41230. Odometer 93,300. Estimated value: $4,500. Ar, 14, :;:iamvowit4r1.4,0ftwItl ..4044,..,4mit#4011441,;,44# PePltflttT.ZZKTNR Unit 1761, 2017 FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR UTILITYSUVAWD License 62528D, VIN 1FM5K8AR2HGD93770 Odometer 88,449 Estimated value: $4,500 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DECLARING CERTAIN POLICE VEHICLES SURPLUS, AND AUTHORIZING THEIR SALE OR DISPOSAL. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila leased new Police Patrol vehicles as part of the annual fleet replacement program replacing two 2017 Police Interceptors; and WHEREAS, the two vehicles described and depicted on Exhibits A and B, have a combined estimated salvage value of $9,000; and WHEREAS, the vehicles described and depicted on Exhibits A and B have outlived their usefulness and are no longer needed by the City of Tukwila's Fleet (Equipment Rental) Department or the Police Department; or any other City Department; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has statutory authority to dispose of personal property under RCW 39.33.010, provided such personal property is declared surplus to the City's needs; WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila may sell the vehicles to Skagit Valley College on such terms and conditions that may be mutually agreed upon; and WHEREAS, Skagit Valley College has authorized its staff to purchase Tukwila's two Police Interceptors; and WHEREAS, Skagit Valley College's administration has sent an intent to purchase said vehicles; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Declaration of Surplus. The two 2017 Police Interceptor vehicles described and depicted on the attached Exhibits A and B are hereby declared surplus. Section 2. Mayor or Designee authorized to sell. The Mayor or designee, as part of the City's replacement program, is hereby authorized to sell the two vehicles described 2025 Fleet Surplus Version: 04/22/2025 Staff. S. Christie Page 1 of 2 28 and depicted in the inventory list and photographs on Exhibits A and B, respectively, to Skagit Valley College for the mutually agreed upon full value of $9,000.00 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2025. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, CMC, City Clerk Tosh Sharp, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Office of the City Attorney Exhibit A: 2025 Fleet Surplus List (Skagit Valley College) Exhibit B: 2025 Fleet Surplus Equipment (Skagit Valley College) — Photographs 2025 Fleet Surplus Version: 04/22/2025 Staff. S. Christie Page 2 of 2 29 30 0' Public Works Department - Pete Mayer, Interim Director TO: FROM: BY: CC: DATE: SUBJECT: ISSUE A 501 Fund replaced. Thomas McLeod, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Pete Mayer, Interim Public Works Director Shawn Christie, Internal Operations Manager Mayor Thomas McLeod April 25, 2025 Purchase Replacement Brush Chipper for Unit 2604 (mechanical failure) asset, Brush Chipper unit 2604 used by the Street Department, needs to be BACKGROUND There are two brush chippers in the City's fleet inventory. Both units are heavily used with one unit used by Parks Maintenance and the other unit used by Street Maintenance. Street Maintenance is assigned the 2002 Vermeer BC100XL unit 2604 which is 23 years old. This unit recently started to have vibration problems and is no longer safe to use. Fleet Services identified that the feed assembly must be replaced at a cost of $10,000 for the unit to be returned to service. Unit 2604 is included in the Fleet Replacement Program and was already scheduled to be replaced in 2027. ANALYSIS With the high cost of the roller assembly repair on a 23-year-old unit, it is more cost effective to accelerate the replacement of this unit than to spend money on repair. The Street Maintenance and Fleet Services teams tested possible replacement units and identified the Bandit Intimidator 12XPC as the unit to purchase. The proposed unit is comparable in size and functionality of the current equipment. The new unit will cost $64,529. FISCAL IMPACT No additional funds are needed for this purchase and no budget overrun will occur. Fleet Services has identified $126,200 in savings in the adopted 2025 Fleet 501 Fund budget to cover the cost of purchasing a replacement brush chipper this year. The savings identified, through fleet utilization analysis, is to repurpose an existing Ford pickup truck for the added Park Ranger position and eliminating one of the replacement Police Patrol vehicles. RECOMMENDATION Approve the 501 fund purchase of a Bandit Intimidator 12XPC brush chipper replacing failed unit 2604 using already realized savings in the 2025 adopted budget and consider this item on the Consent Agenda for the May 5, 2025 Regular Council Meeting. Fleet & Facility Services • 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98168 • 206-431-0166 Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard -• Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.go'1 32 TO: FROM: BY: CC: DATE: SUBJECT: Public Works Department - Pete Mayer, Interim Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee Pete Mayer, Interim Director David Baus, Transportation Project Manager Mayor Thomas McLeod April 25, 2025 2024 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Study Update Presentation on the 2024 PCI Study Results Contract No. 24-072 Thomas McLeod, Mayor ISSUE Provide the Transportation and Infrastructure Services Committee with an update on the condition of the City's roads, presenting findings from the 2024 PCI study and incorporating comparisons to the 2020 PCI Study. BACKGROUND PCI studies are essential for evaluating the condition of city roads and identifying pavement issues, such as cracks or potholes. They allow cities to prioritize maintenance, improve safety, and manage infrastructure budgets effectively. By providing a clear understanding of road conditions, PCI studies help cities plan strategic repairs and ensure long-term economic and public safety benefits ANALYSIS The City's average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score has increased by one point since the 2020 study and now stands at 67, which is above the national average of 60 to 65. Key findings from the study include: 1. Streets rated as "excellent" account for 9.5%, falling short of the target of 15%. 2. The backlog amount is 6%, significantly below the national average of 12%. Looking ahead, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget of $2.5M through 2028 will be slightly below the steady-state funding required to maintain the city's current PCI level. FISCAL IMPACT The cost for 2024 PCI Study was $52,890, which was paid for by an ARPA Grant. RECOMMENDATION Although this is a discussion only presentation, we recommend performing a city PCI study every four (4) years with next occurring in year 2028. Attachments: 2024 PCI Study Tukwila City Hall • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, WA 98188 • 206-433-1800 • Website: TukwilaWA.gov 33 Pavement Management Report December 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 PROJECT AND METHODS OVERVIEW 1 1.2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2 2.0 PRINCIPLES OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 5 2.1 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES 5 3.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 7 3.1 FIELD SURVEY METHODOLOGY 7 3.2 DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE 8 3.3 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY 9 3.4 ESA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 17 3.5 ICC INFORM PAVEMENT NETWORK CONDITION VIEWER 20 3.6 SUMMARY 20 4.0 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY RESULTS 21 4.1 CITY STREET INVENTORY AND CONDITION SUMMARY 21 4.2 CITY NETWORK CONDITION IMAGERY 22 4.3 CITY NETWORK CONDITION DISTRIBUTION 29 4.4 CONDITION BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION 30 4.5 SUMMARY 31 5.0 REHABILITATION PLAN & BUDGET DEVELOPMENT 32 5.1 KEY ANALYSIS SET POINTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 32 5.2 NETWORK BUDGET ANALYSIS MODELS 34 5.3 POST REHABILITATION CONDITION 38 5.4 SUMMARY 38 6.0 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS & COMMENTS 39 6.1 PROJECT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 39 6.2 CLOSING 39 35 APPENDED REPORTS Following Page 40 Appendix A Street Inventory and Condition Summary by Segment Appendix B 5-Year Rehab Plan Appendix C Full-size Maps APPENDED MAPS Functional Classification Current Pavement condition index (PCI) 5 Year Rehabilitation Plan: $1.4M Annual Budget 5 Year Post Rehabilitation PCI: $1.4M Annual Budget /MS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page i 36 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i°i Project and Methods Overview |nJuly of2024 IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LP (IMS) utilized a cutting -edge Integrated Road Information System (|R|Spro Pave) (Figure 1)to capture continunus, high -resolution pavement images that were used to assess pavement cracking, rutting, and roughness on 82 centerline miles of predominantly asphalt roadways in Tukwila, WA (City). IMS followed the American Society for TestingandMaterio|s(ASTM)O6433siandardtoana|yzetheinnagesanddistressdatoco||ectedby the IRISpro to determine the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for each segment of the road. PCI values were recorded to provide an indication of the surface conditions and structural integrity of a pavement. Using the Easy Street Analysis (ESA) pavement management system, IMS developed multi -year pavement maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) recommendations for the roadways surveyed. The recommendations consider the severity, quantity, and type of pavement distresses, surface type, pavement strength and functional class. By utilizing these recommendations, the City can make informed decisions on how best to allocate their resources to ensure the longevity and safety of their roadways. ' ' 67, ^ ............ . . . � Figure 1 - IMS Integrated Road Information System platform (IRISPro Pave) The PCI method was used in accordance with the ASTM D6433 standards to assess the condition of the City's pavements. This method is considered an objective and repeatable approach to assess pavement condition, which is preferrab|eto alternative methods that rely upon potentially biased human ratings. Based on the PCI results, ESA prioritizes funding using a cost -of -deferral approach, recommending K4&Ractivities that optimize funding by selecting rehabilitation candidates only when they approach the critical point where a heavier maintenance activity will soon be needed to restore the roadway tofull service. mmPavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page | l 37 The analysis and data presented in this report are based on the inspections performed by IMS in July 2024 on the City's pavement network, using available work history and other assumptions that are elaborated on later in this report. 1.2 Results Overview and Recommendations PCI values provide an indication of the surface conditions and structural integrity of a pavement. The 0-100 PCI range is commonly divided into categories using descriptive terms: Very Poor, Poor, Marginal, Fair, Good, Very Good, and Excellent. Divisions between the terms are not fixed but are meant to reflect common perceptions of pavement conditions. These divisions are discussed in more detail in Section 3.0. The City's roadways were generally found to be in Good condition with an average PCI of 67. Figure 2 provides a visual breakdown of the distribution of pavement area across different PCI categories at the time of analysis. Approximately 49% of the City's roadways were found to be in Excellent or Very Good condition. If structurally sound, these pavements are often suitable candidates for cost- effective preventive maintenance treatments. On the other hand, pavements with a PCI below 40 (i.e., pavements in Poor or Very Poor condition) comprise the City's "backlog" of M&R. The City's backlog was found to be 6%. These pavements typically require full or partial reconstruction. Pavements falling within the middle categories, such as Fair or Marginal condition, often benefit from mill and overlay projects. It's important to note that these are general recommendations, and the specific M&R strategy may vary based on factors such as distress types, soil conditions, structural adequacy, and other project -specific details. V Poor (0 to 25) 0% Poor 25 to 40) 6% ■ V Poor (0 to 25) ■ Poor (25 to 40) o Marginal (40 to 50) ❑ Fair (50 to 60) Good (60 to 70) IN V Good (70 to 85) ■ Excellent (85 to 100) Figure 2 - Distribution of the City's Pavement System on a Condition Scale IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 12 38 Metrics of Health The following three metrics are frequently used as indicators of overall pavement network health. The pavement analysis uses these metrics as benchmarks when determining budget goals, such as the backlog control, PCI control, and recommended funding levels. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) - The PCI score is a ranking assessment on the overall health of a pavement segment on a scale of 0 to 100. The network average PCI is a good global indicator of a network's overall health. Percent of Excellent Roads - Roads with a condition category of Excellent are those that score between a PCI of 85 to 100. Backlog -Backlog is the Very Poor and Poor roads (between a PCI of 0 and 40) that represent a portion of the network in need of extensive rehabilitation such as full and partial reconstruction. Using sound pavement management and finance principles, a very healthy network will have a backlog of 10% or less. The City met two out of three of the metrics for evaluating the quality of its roadway network. ✓ The network average pavement condition score exceeds the national average currently seen by IMS of 60 to 65, with the City's average scoring a 67. o The number of streets rated Excellent is below the minimum recommended target of 15% at 9.5% ✓ The backlog amount is below the average value of 12% at 6%. The analysis conducted by IMS using the ESA pavement management system has provided the City with valuable insights into the condition of its roadways. To assess the effect of annual budget on PCI over a five-year period, Figure 3 has been generated to depict the anticipated PCI in five years relative to different annual budget allocations. The blue line allows the user to assess the effect of a given annual budget on the PCI in five years, serving as a valuable tool for understanding the potential effects of budget decisions on future pavement conditions. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 13 39 80 c O 0 75 V O huo co L > 70 L O 65 a Z ra tu 60 0 55 2025 to 2029 Rehab Analysis Results Target PCI Driven Budget: PCI = 75, Backlog = 3%, Annual Budget = $4.53M/Yr Steady State PCI: Final PCI = 67, Backlog = 5%, Annual Budget = $2.65M/Yr PCI Control Budget: Final PCI = 65, Backlog = 8%, Annual Budget = $2M/Yr - - - - -Backlog Control Budget: Final PCI = 64, Backlog = 10%, Annual Budget = $1.62M/Yr Tukwila, WA Budget: Final PCI = 63, Backlog = 11%, Annual Budget = $1.4M/Yr Current PCI = 67 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Annual Budget Each Year for Five Years ($1M/Yr) Figure 3 - PCI Based on Five -Year Annual Budget Funding Models It is important to note that the information presented in the Executive Summary is condensed from various sections of this report. Reviewers are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the detailed information provided in subsequent sections of the report prior to making any specific decisions based on these results. This will ensure that decisions regarding M&R activities are based on a comprehensive understanding of the conditions of the roadways and the recommendations provided in the report. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 14 40 2.0 PRINCIPLES OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT This section provides an overview of pavement management, including its objectives and the best practices for M&R planning throughout the lifecycle of a pavement. It also highlights the integration of these concepts in the ESA pavement management system, which was used in this report to develop recommendations and analyze the City's pavement network. This context is important for understanding the content and findings of the report. 2.1 ave ent ana a ent rinci • les Pavement management is the process of assessing, prioritizing, and preserving or rehabilitating pavements through a logical system that attempts to use available funds in the most cost-effective manner possible. The process is iterative, and as more data becomes available, prediction models are refined to improve accuracy. Figure 4 illustrates that pavements typically start deteriorating rapidly once they hit a specific threshold. Therefore, it is more cost-effective to invest in cheaper surface treatments during the first 40% of a pavement's lifespan than to defer maintenance until heavier overlays or reconstruction is required just a few years later. Streets that are repaired while in good condition will have an extended lifespan and will cost less to maintain over their lifetime than those left to deteriorate to a poor condition. Without an adequate routine pavement maintenance program, streets will require more frequent reconstruction, thereby requiring significantly greater funding. Pavement Cond drop in quality n40%of life Inexpensive surface treatment Costly pavement rehabilitation Time 40% drop in quality in 1Sm%of life Figure 4 - Pavement Deterioration and Life Cycle Costs The types of rehabilitation activities that the City chooses to deploy can have a significant effect on the longevity of a pavement. Depending on the PCI zone in which a pavement falls, a detailed rehabilitation strategy needs to be formed. Common rehabilitation types include localized preventive or stop gap activities (e.g. crack sealing, joint sealing, and patching), global preventive maintenance (e.g. fog seals, rejuvenators, slurry seals, microsurfacing, chip seals, cape seals, and thin overlays), major Rehabilitation (e.g. thin or thick mill and overlays), and major Reconstruction IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 15 41 (e.g. surface reconstruction or full reconstruction). Popular examples of cost-effective preventative activities include: • Crack and Joint Sealing • Patching • Microsurfacing • Fog Seal and Rejuvenators • Slurry and Chip Seals • Thin Overlays A proactive pavement management program focuses on the preventative maintenance category and advocates proper incorporation and application of cost-effective preventative activities. These activities help maintain and repair the surface integrity which can slow deterioration and, depending on the treatment, also extend the life of a pavement. The outcome of this exercise is to increase long-term cost savings and network -level pavement quality over time. When completed within the target zone for preventative maintenance, a pavement's lifespan can be conveniently extended. The dashed curves in Figure 5 show the typical lifespan of a pavement that does not undergo any preventive maintenance. Major reconstruction becomes necessary after approximately 20 years. The blue curves show the benefits of preventive maintenance during the first 40% of a pavement's lifespan. Eventually, all pavements will need to undergo reconstruction; however, proactive maintenance and rehabilitation can delay this process for up to an additional 40 years. 0 Pavement Life Cycle Target Zone for Pave en Preservation . increased Pavement Life Target Zone for Pavement Rehabilitation Time Figure 5 - Pavement Life Cycle Curve The most effective approach to ensure optimal usage of available funds or to determine the necessary funding to achieve a predetermined level of service is by using a pavement management system. An effective pavement management system can assist agencies in developing an organized catalog of pavement assets, storing periodic condition assessments, and tracking spending and costs. This enables the City to compare trends in data to assess the effectiveness of maintenance activities and new technologies. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 16 42 3.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 3.1 Field Survey Methodology IMS deployed one of its IrisPro Pave Integrated Road Information Systems for data collection. IrisPro Pave integrates industry -leading subsystems, including 3D pavement imaging systems, lasers, accelerometers, right-of-way cameras, GPS antenna, distance measurement instruments, computers and more (Figure 6). All collected data is captured with DriveTM data collection software, which is designed to simplify the collection of quality road data with built-in calibration schedules, real-time quality control, GIS maps, section tracking, audible alerts and voice memos, fly -by events, and exception reporting. The custom -designed hardware and software on IrisPro Pave provides sub - millisecond synchronization between all subsystems. ✓ Teledyne FLIR Ladybug 5 Captures 36O imagery at Defined Intervals v ASTM Class 1 IrisPRO Pavement Profiler Continuous Right and Left O phe Path Roughness Measurements Pavement Distress Imaging LCMS-2 Continuous 3D Imaging, 1 mnm Resolution *e Drivel Automated f_)eta Collection Paired evith Field Observations No" GPS Positioning GPS e3th Integrated IMU, Sub Meter Positional Accuracy Samsara Monitoring ReaiaTime Tracking, and Reporting. Texture Continuous Surface e cure !Measurements sl Linear Distance Positioning DM! for Precise Linear Distaunce Measurements Safety Lighting Front and Back Facing Flashing Lights Ensr.rrr high Visibility IrisPRO Pave Figure 6 - LCMS-2 data collection vehicle IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 17 43 3D Pavement Imaging The Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS-2) captures continuous 2D and 3D images at 1 mm resolution in the lane of travel up to 4 m (13 ft) wide at highway speeds, allowing for the visualization and characterization of all features on the road surface. The system allows for collection rates up to 28,000 profiles per second, five times faster than the first edition of LCMS. This allows smaller cracks, especially transverse cracks, to be detected more consistently than in the past. The vertical accuracy has also improved from 0.50 mm to 0.25 mm. High Quality Imaging The Ladybug 5+ captures high quality 30MP spherical images using six cameras for a 360-degree view of the roadway and surroundings. The images can be viewed in panoramic mode, 360 mode, or individual directional images can be extracted at any desired camera angle. Both the Pavement imaging and right of way cameras are triggered on a fixed -distance basis, image capture is precisely synchronized to GPSTime and DMI, and cameras are calibrated for asset inventory and geo- referenced image measurements. 3.2 ' ata P uality ssurance The collected data is processed in the office using the ConnectTM software. Connect provides a perfectly synchronized multi window platform to view and alter all collected data including profile, distress, slope, International Roughness Index (IRI), events, images, and GPS map. Figure 7 shows some examples of how data can be viewed in Connect. Using Connect, the LCMS-2 3D pavement images are analyzed to identify and classify distresses, and the longitudinal profile of the road is analyzed to determine the IRI and ride quality under the wheel paths according to industry standards. All processed data is matched to the segment ID of the roadway. To ensure the accurate determination of PCI scores, the field data undergoes a rigorous series of processing phases and quality checks. These checks encompass synchronized assessment of both processed and raw data streams. The automatic distress identification and classification process involves various steps: First, different rules and processing parameters are applied on different pavement types; next, the auto detected lane markings are manually adjusted to exclude non - pavement areas and limit the assessment area for cracking and rutting to between the lane markings and invalidation rules are applied to exclude additional anomalies (e.g. near railroad crossing or bridge decks) from the assessment area. Finally, a team of pavement raters who are well -versed in both the distress standards and the data in its digital format review images and make the necessary corrections on areas with gross under/over detection. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 18 44 Figure 7 - QC Image from ConnectTM Software To further confirm the accuracy of our condition data, spot checks are conducted on a network -wide basis by both the QC team and engineering staff. These spot checks are carried out on a random selection of road sections across the entire network to verify that the condition data is consistent and accurate. They also help to identify any potential issues that may have been missed during the initial data collection and review process. Once the QC team and engineering staff have established the integrity of the data, an initial condition spreadsheet with detailed data and summary tables and charts is prepared and submitted for review by the Client. This review process involves a careful examination of the condition data and includes a comprehensive analysis of the data's completeness, accuracy, and consistency before preparing data for import to City's pavement management system. 3.3 Pavement Condition Survey The goal of the pavement condition survey is to determine an accurate rating for each pavement section. The process of collecting and assessing data involves both automated and manual observations that originate from the data collected with the IrisPro Pave equipped with LCMS-2 downward imaging lasers, an array of 4k cameras, and trained rating personnel. Within the "Network Analysis" tab in ESA, IMS has populated values for Surface Distresses, Roughness score, and Strength Rating. These three indices form the foundation on which ESA operates. They allow weighing factors to be uniquely specified for PCI calculation. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 19 45 Surface Distress Index (SDI) ASTM D6433 provides a method of categorizing surface distress observations for both asphalt and concrete pavements, based on the extent and severity of distresses along the roadway. The Surface Distress Index (SDI) is used to represent the observed pavement defects on a scale from 0 to 100. However, not all surface distresses are given equal weight. Load -associated distresses (LAD), such as rutting or alligator cracking on asphalt streets, and divided slabs on concrete streets, have a greater impact on the SDI than non -load associated distresses (NLAD), such as raveling or longitudinal and transverse cracking. Even when present in low extents and moderate severity, LAD can significantly decrease the SDI. The SDI inputs are shown in Figure 8. Distress Type Distress Quantity MOW Surface Distress Index (SDI) 4111,4111p- Distress Severity Figure 8 - SDI Inputs and Detailed Scale IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 110 46 ASTM D6433 covers nearly forty unique distress types that may or may not be present in an agency's road network. For that reason, IMS uses a modified approach that collects the most common and relevant distresses. The descriptions in Table 1 outline some ofthe distresses collected for the City: Table 1 - Distress Descriptions Pavement[��tress7ype Description Type Alligator Cracking Asphalt ^ Quantified bvseverity and square footage ^ Caused bvthe repeated bending from vehicle loads ^Pmpagate from the bottom, meaning that structural failure has occurred ^AnLAD with significant impact onthe condition score, even atlow extents Longitudinal & Transverse Cracking Asphalt Asphalt ^ Caused bvthe permanent deformation ofthe pavement and/or subgrade|ayers ^ Low densities can have alarge impact onthe final condition score due to their implication of possible structural failure ^ Quantified bvtheir length and width ^ Results from pavement shrinkage due tonatural daily and seasonal temperature cycles, construction issues, or other factors m� _ mmPavement Management Report Tukwila, wmzoz^ page | ll 47 Block Cracking Patching Raveling Bleeding Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt • Quantified by their width and square footage • Form interconnected longitudinal and transverse cracks • Divides the pavement into rectangular pieces • Results from aging and environmental factors • Quantified by the square footage and severity • Always considered a surface defect • Affects ride quality and condition of a pavement • Measured by severity and square footage affected • Loss of coarse aggregate on pavement surface • Measured by severity and square footage • Presence of free asphalt binder on the roadway surface • Results in a pavement surface with reduced skid resistance • Caused by either an excess of asphalt in the pavement or insufficient voids in the matrix IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 1 12 48 Corner Breaks Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Concrete Concrete • Measured in linear feet • Caused by traffic loading and weakened base conditions resulting from poor drainage • Run parallel to the road, usually within 1 to 2 feet of the outer edge of the pavement • Bumps and sags, depressions, swell, corrugation, and shoving • Caused by several factors, such as construction issues, subgrade mixture failure, environmental influence, etc. • Wearing away of asphalt binder and fine aggregate matrix • Quantified by severity and square footage • Slab divided by cracks into four or more pieces • Caused by overloading, inadequate support, or both • Categorized as a severe corner break if all pieces or cracks are contained within a corner break • Crack that intersects with a joint at less than 1/2 the slab length • Caused by repeated load on a surface with a failing base IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 113 49 Joint Spalling Concrete • A breakdown of the edges of a slab within 2ft of a joint • The depth of the cracking and area affected determine the severity Faulting Concrete Durability Concrete Cracking Scaling Concrete Punchouts Concrete • Identified by a difference in elevation across a joint • Severe faults have a >3/4 inch elevation difference between two adjacent concrete slabs • Caused by the freeze - thaw expansion of the large aggregate • Breaks down concrete over -time • Typically runs parallel to a joint or linear crack • A high severity "D" crack covers more than 15% of the overall slab • A result of the surface layer of concrete being worn away over time by weathering • Measured by severity and total area affected • Caused by heavy and repeat loads, inadequate slab thickness, and a deterioration of the base foundation • Measured by severity and number of individual cracks within the distress IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 14 50 Roughness Index (RI) The Roughness Index (RI) provides a quantifiable measure of ride quality, which is determined using the industry -standard ASTM E1926 for calculating the IRI. This value is derived from the longitudinal profile captured by the LCMS as it records the change in elevation over a distance. Once calculated, it is expressed as a slope and reported in millimeters per meter (mm/m). Typical IRI levels for new, older, and damaged pavements are displayed in Figure 9. The IRI is lower on average for roads or pavements that are normally used for higher speed travel. IRI (mm/m) 20 — 18 10- 8- 6- 4- 2- 0 Normal Use 20 mph 30 mph Airport New Older Maintained Damaged Rough Highways Pavements Pavements Unpaved Pavements Unpaved Road Road Road or Pavement Type 40 mph 50 mph 60 mph Figure 9 - IRI Scale Definitions To enable the use of a blended condition score that incorporates both PCI and IRI scores, the IRI value is converted to an equivalent scale for analysis purposes. This is achieved by converting the IRI value into a score on a scale from 0 to 100 and reporting it as the RI using the following formula: RI = (11 - 3.5 x In(IRI)) x 10 In(IRI) is the natural logarithm of IRI. Structural Index (SI) Structural adequacy testing was not requested by the City. Instead, IMS investigated the relationship between the PCI and the number of LAD observed in each pavement section to generate structural indices. Based on this analysis, each section was assigned a rating of Weak, Moderate, or Strong in terms of its strength. These ratings were represented by an SI of 30, 60, or 80, respectively. The established SI was not used in calculating the overall pavement condition score but rather to help determine appropriate rehabilitation strategies based on the pavement strength rating. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 115 51 Pavement condition index (P[|)-Following the field surveys, the condition data was imported tn ESA for calculating the overall PCI. The PCI for each segment was calculated using the following percentages of weighing factors: Table 2 presents each PCI category along with a brief description of the typical distresses and recommended treatments for each. Very Poor Table 2 - Pavement Condition Categories Typical Distresses and HH&R Recommendations Like new condition - little to no maintenance required. Monitor condition or preventive maintenance. Minor cracking, raveling, and other NLAD Routine orpreventive maintenance. E.g., Crack sealing, surface treatment Minor tomoderate cracking and low severity LAD such asalligator cracking and rutting. Surface treatments with localized repairs and overlays Eg,Surface treatments, localized surface thin overlay Moreextensive and severe longitudinal and transverse cracking, as well asmoderate severity LAD Localized repairs ormajor rehabilitation. E.g',Locolized surface ondlorfull-depth patching, moderate overlays Localized high -severity alligator cracking, and rutting Major rehabilitation. Eg,Loco0zedƒu0-depthpatching, mill and overlay, traditional overlay A greater extent of severe alligator cracking, rutting Major rehabilitation. E.g,More extensive full -depth patching, mill and traditional overlay Extensive and severe alligator cracking, more extensive and deeper rutting, and potholes. Major rehabilitation. E.g., Full -depth reclamation, reconstruction PCI Range mmPavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page | 16 52 3• ave ent ana e ent yste The ESA software provides all the functionalities of a standalone software package while being user-friendly. It provides the City with a tool that can effectively catalog, classify, assess, track, and analyze condition data to aid in the processes of budget planning and pavement rehabilitation. More specifically the program helps the City streamline its pavement management by giving structure to the basic information required for a management system: • Pavement Section Inventory • Pavement Deterioration Modeling • Prioritization • Funding Analysis Pavement Section Inventory An accurate inventory of all City -owned streets is necessary to make any determinations, assumptions, or projections within a management system. Individual attributes such as length, width, location, traffic use, surface type, condition, and other factors may be tracked and tied back to a single management segment within ESA. Thereafter, they are given a unique ID within the program. These attributes are critical in determining appropriate rehabilitation activities, prioritizing the management segments within the system, and facilitating placement and sorting during reporting. • Inspection Data • Rehabilitation Selections & History • Work Planning • Reporting Inspection Data ESA provides the City with the flexibility to use a blended condition index that can be tailored to meet specific goals and requirements. The inputs for this index rely on inspection data from the field survey. This custom reporting value is built based on various aspects considered while ranking the condition of a pavement. The inputs for this index are derived from inspection data collected during the field survey, including PCI and IRI data. Details on the individual components of the inspection are available earlier in Section 3.0. Pavement Deterioration Modeling Inspection data by itself is only capable of representing conditions at the time of collection. Nevertheless, within ESA there are customizable curves that can predict the rate of pavement deterioration based on a streets functional class, pavement type, and strength rating. These deterioration curves are critical in predicting future pavement conditions and determining appropriate rehabilitation strategies. The model assumes that pavements with similar attributes and usage will deteriorate at similar rates. For instance, high volume asphalt arterials that are already in poor condition are expected to deteriorate faster and are represented in Figure 10 by a purple line. In contrast, low volume concrete local streets are expected to deteriorate slowly and are represented by a blue dashed line. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 117 53 Pavement Condition Index 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 ACP Curve-1 -ACP Curve -2 ACP Curve -3 ACP Curve - 4 _........... ACP Curve 5 PCC Curve -9 PCC Curve - 10 PCC Curve - 11 10 20 30 40 Time (Years) 50 60 70 Figure 10 - Asphalt Concrete Pavement (ACP) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Deterioration Curves Rehabilitation Work Selections & History ESA uses a set of protocols that allow for activities to be assigned to PCI ranges based on filter criteria that give the City the ability to create detailed rehabilitation strategy sets for each functional class and pavement type according to the best practices determined for that pavement. As planned rehabilitation work is completed, a record of the work should be added to the pavement management system. This ensures that conditions are up to date for future selections and creates a repository of information to aid in planning. Prioritization Within ESA, the option is available to prioritize pavement projects for rehabilitation based on six main criteria: PCI, Cost of Deferral, Pavement Strength, Pavement Type, Functional Class, and the Area of a segment. Depending on the goals set forth at the beginning of the project, these criteria can be weighted differently based on their definition to create an overall priority factor for a project. Additional details on these factors are available in Section 5. Project planning The ability to plan work as needed allows the management program to better reflect the realities of a paving program. Certain constraints may be applied to funds that require their use within a certain year and activities relating to other assets may dictate the time and type of work to be performed. ESA allows for predefined projects to be entered into the management plan to account for work that is known. This ensures that the outcome is consistent with overall City planning and accurately reflects current funding allocations. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 118 54 In terms of pavement management efficiency, a program based on worst -first, that is starting at the lowest -rated street and working up towards the highest, does not achieve an optimal expenditure of funds. Generally, under this scenario, agencies cannot sufficiently fund pavement rehabilitation and lose ground despite injecting large amounts of capital into the network. The preferred basis of rehabilitation candidate selection is to examine the cost of deferral of a street against increased life expectancy. Funding analysis The actual process of determining where and when to spend funds is a function of the inputs mentioned in this section. Information from the street section inventory, condition survey, deterioration modeling, rehabilitation activity protocols, prioritization, and project planner are all assessed to predict the potential outcomes of funding scenarios. These can either be goal -based or budget -based. A more detailed description is available in Section 5.0. Reporting ESA has the ability to generate basic reports for common data requests through a set of predefined layouts. This allows for quick access to section condition summaries, inspection data, budget scenario summaries, and data charts. The GIS data used to generate this report is also linked to the section summary information to allow for quick and easy visualizations of the data if imported into a GIS utility. An example of data, as presented in ESA, can be seen in Figure 11. Figure 11 - Example of ESA City Data IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 119 55 3.5 ICC Inform Pavement Network Condition Viewer Included with every IMS pavement management project is an out -of -the -box, user friendly, browser - based image and condition viewer toll called ICC Inform. Inform provides a convenient medium through which the City may view the imagery collected during the pavement survey. This includes a forward view of the pavement, the downward LCMS view, and a panoramic 360-degree view allowing the City to view each pavement observation from several perspectives. Lastly, a complete map of the City will track the location of every pavement image, providing additional context to the individual pavement segments. An example of Inform can be seen in Figure 12 below. YNFORM ., II— III —Life MI. NAME STIiMO MEW Mai i@EA[£ �. x. v. s • n 'JVtu69a S:E xi.. R. +',F .ieOv;E9}4C uS�i NS E&ESE fit :R��Lt. Figure 12 - ICC Inform Image Viewer The "play" button in the top left of the Inform application provides the user a means to follow the RST as it drives the City streets. The drop -down menus in the top -center portion of the screen allow the user to quickly search for a particular street segment by GISID, and to even compare images from multiple years of surveys _if data is available from previous survey years). The entirety of this proprietary image -viewing application can be accessed through a web browser by following a link that has been provided to the City staff. 3.6 Summary This section outlined the fundamental concepts of pavement management and described the implementation process for the City's pavement management system. The operating parameters of ESA were reviewed, and the inputs provided by the LCMS-2 technology were explained to provide context for calculating PCI, Roughness Index, and Pavement Strength. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 120 56 4.0 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY RESULTS This section will review the results of the pavement condition survey performed in July 2024. The segments were deteriorated using the defined pavement deterioration models to reflect the conditions of the roadways at the time of analysis (January 2025). This section includes a summary of conditions in the functional classes used in the City's analysis, followed by a review of network photos taken from the survey vehicle. A series of charts will then summarize the findings of the condition survey and provide an overview of the PCI distribution across the City's pavement network. 4.1 City Street Inventory and Condition Summary The City of Tukwila is currently responsible for approximately 82 centerline miles of pavement with an overall PCI of 67 and a backlog of 6%. The following Table 3 presents the City's inventory and pavement condition breakdown across different functional classes. Detailed information for each pavement segment is available in Appendix A. Table 3 - Network Inventory Summary by Functional Class and Pavement Type Segment (Block) Count Network Length (mi): Pavement Type Network Arterial Arterial Collector Local All Streets Asphalt Concrete All Streets Asphalt Concrete 803 82 81 2 Principal Minor 96 114 14 13 1 15 14 121 472 118 468 3 13 4 41 12 41 1 0 0 Network Area (yd2): Current Pavement Condition Index (CPCI) 1/1/2025 All Streets Asphalt Concrete All Streets Asphalt Concrete 1652585 1612013 40572 67 67 84 441300 358634 424962 16338 70 69 84 346514 12120 66 65 84 60311 249533 8 59742 243111 6 6422 5692 67 66 66 66 81 86 Current Backlog (%) 1/1/25 All Streets 6 Percentage of Network with a PCI < 40 IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 121 57 4.2 City Network Condition Imagery The images presented in this section provide a sampling of the City's streets that fall into various condition categories. A discussion of potential rehabilitation strategies is included for each category. Very Poor (PCI = 0 to 25) - Complete Reconstruction South 1415t Street from 56th Avenue to 56th Place (GISID 1591, PCI = 22) - Rated as Very Poor, this street displays a large quantity of alligator and edge cracking severe enough to suggest that the pavement structure is inadequate for current traffic loads. The rehabilitation of roads in this condition through a mill and overlay is generally ineffective, as the failures usually extend to the bottom of the pavement layer. Streets in this condition require rehabilitation that involves removal and replacement of the asphalt layer, base stabilization, or complete reconstruction based on design requirements. Deferral of reconstruction of streets rated as Very Poor will not cause a substantial decrease in overall pavement quality. The streets have passed the opportunity for overlay -based strategies, meaning that reconstruction, which can be expensive, is the most suitable solution. Thus, Very Poor streets are often deferred in favor of rehabilitating more streets at lower costs, resulting in a greater net benefit to the City. This strategy, however, must be sensitive to citizen complaints that may demand the prioritization of these street repairs. In addition, this type of street can pose a safety hazard for motorists since severe potholes and distortions may develop. It is important to consistently monitor these streets and check for potholes or other structural deficiencies until the street is eventually rebuilt. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 122 58 Poor (PCI = 25 to 40) - Last Opportunity for Surface and Base Rehabilitation West Marginal Place from City Limit to South 102nd Street (GISID 1518, PCI = 26) - Rated as Poor, this segment still has some remaining life before it becomes a critical reconstruction need. As evident in the imagery, a fair amount of the segment contains alligator cracking. There are also deep longitudinal and transverse cracks, particularly along the edges of the pavement. If left untreated, a partial to full reconstruction would be required within a short period of time. On heavily trafficked roadways, Poor streets often require partial to full reconstruction. On local roadways, they generally require removal of the pavement surface through grinding or excavation, base repairs, restoration of the curb line and drainage, and then placement of a new surface. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 123 59 Marginal (PCI = 40 to 50) - Thick Overlay Orillia Road from South 188th Street to South 200th Street (GISID 1371, PCI = 47) - This street displays transverse and longitudinal cracking across the middle and edges of the pavement. There are sections of alligator cracking dispersed along the segment as well. Marginal streets that display high amounts of load associated distresses (LAD) are selected as a high priority for rehabilitation as they generally provide the best cost/benefit ratio to the City. If left untreated, Marginal streets with high amounts of LAD will deteriorate to become partial reconstruction candidates. Marginal streets that are failing due to materials issues or non -load associated failures may become suitable candidates for thick overlays if deferred, without a significant cost increase. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 124 60 Fair (PCI = 50 to 60) - Moderate Overlay East Marginal Way from Tukwila Boulevard to Boeing Access Road (GISID 1423, PCI = 55) - Fair streets have similar characteristics to Marginal streets in that the distresses present tend to be localized and moderate in severity; however, the distresses will predominately be non -load related (i.e., caused by environmental or other factors). This street displays block cracking towards the middle of the pavement. There are moderate amounts of longitudinal and transverse cracking, with some cracks being deep but localized. Like Marginal streets, Fair streets can provide a good cost/benefit ratio to an agency if addressed with an adequate rehabilitation technique. Stretching the application for surface treatments into this range can pose a cheap alternative to overlays but does not provide the appropriate renewal to the structural capacity of the pavement and may allow load related deterioration to continue unabated. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 125 61 Good (PCI = 60 to 70) - Surface Treatments Southcenter Parkway from Strander Boulevard to South 168th Street (GISID 1775, PCI = 66) - Rated as Good, the primary cause of deterioration for this street is the longitudinal and transverse cracking. The pavement surface could be restored with spot patching to remedy the more heavily distressed areas. Preventive measures on streets considered Good can have a positive impact on the City's funding needs. While the expected life of a slurry seal is not as long as that of an overlay, its ability to slow deterioration and relatively low cost can free up funding for streets in worse condition. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 126 62 Very Good (PCI = 70 to 85) - Surface Treatments and Localized Rehabilitation Klickitat Drive from 51st Avenue to 53rd Avenue (GISID 1397, PCI = 77) - Rated as Very Good, this street displays minor amounts of longitudinal cracking. It is an example of a candidate for preventive maintenance to extend the life of the roadway. Also, routine maintenance prevents water intrusion by sealing and slowing crack growth. By keeping water out of the base layers, the pavement life is extended without the need for heavier rehabilitations. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 127 63 Excellent (PCI = 85 to 100) Inerurban Avenue from 143rd Place to 144th Street (GISID 1424, PCI = 91) - Rated as Excellent, this pavement displays little to no surface distresses. The ride is smooth, and the surface and the base are intact. Excellent roads should be periodically assessed for crack development that would trigger routine maintenance activities. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 128 64 4.3 City Network Condition Distribution Figure 13 shows the distribution of pavement condition for the roadway network in Tukwila. • Approximately ten percent (9.5%) of the network can be considered in Excellent condition and should be closely monitored to ensure timely application of early localized preventive measures. • Approximately forty percent (39.5%) of the network falls into the PCI range considered Very Good. These are roads that benefit most from preventive maintenance techniques, such as spot patching and slurry seals. • Twenty-three percent (23.3%) of the streets are rated as Good and may still be candidates for slurry seals or thin overlays. • Approximately twenty-one percent (21.3%) of the network can be considered in Fair to Marginal condition and represents candidates for progressively thicker overlay -based rehabilitation. If left untreated, they will decline rapidly into reconstruction candidates. • Less than six percent (6.4%) of the network is rated as Poor or Very Poor, meaning these roadways have deteriorated to the point where surface rehabilitation can no longer restore the pavement to a point of structural adequacy. Rehabilitation of the entire pavement structure is required for these segments. Percentage of Network By Area 45 35 30 25 20 15 10 Current Network Average Condition = 67, Backlog = 6.4% Backlog V Poor Poor Marginal 39.5 Fair Good V Good Excellent (0 to 25) (25 to 40) (40 to 50) (50 to 60) (60 to 70) (70 to 85) (85 to 100) Current Pavement Condition Using Descriptive Terms Figure 13 - Roadway Network Present Status Using Descriptive Terms IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 129 65 4.4 Condition By Functional Classification Analyzing subsets of data in addition to the overall pavement condition can provide a better understanding of where an agency should focus its resources. Figure 14 displays the distribution of pavement conditions for each functional class. 50 40 ro a 30 T co i O , a) a) z 20 0 0 ao CU c 0 v a 10 • Principal Arterial, PCI = 70 • Minor Arterial, PCI = 66 • Collector, PCI = 67 • Local, PCI = 66 V Poor Poor Marginal Fair Good V Good Excellent (0 to 25) (25 to 40) (40 to 50) (50 to 60) (60 to 70) (70 to 85) (85 to 100) Pavement Condition Using Descriptive Terms Figure 14 - Condition Rating by Functional Classification When evaluating the condition of pavement based on the percentage of network it covers, the proportion of each class in the overall network must also be considered. This distribution is illustrated in Figure 15. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 130 66 Figure 15 - Functional Classification Distribution By Area 4.5 Summary Section 4.0 of the report provided a detailed analysis of the results obtained from the pavement condition survey conducted in the City of Tukwila. The section covered the functional classifications in the City and their respective PCI values, which were further illustrated with pavement photographs taken during the survey. Additionally, the section provided a breakdown of the pavement condition distribution for each functional class and pavement type. Overall, the network average PCI for Tukwila was found to be 67 with a backlog of 6%. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 131 67 5.o REHABILITATION PLAN i BUDGET DEVELOPMENT This section discusses the results of the pavement management analysis that was performed using the ESA pavement management system, starting with an overview of the assumptions that were used when implementing the system, such as the unit rates and the selection methodology for rehabilitation candidates. The subsequent section, 5.2, details the results of each of the various budget runs, along with their predicted conditions. This is highlighted further through a series of charts that are used to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of various funding models. .1 ey nalysis et oints an ssu tions Pavement management analysis requires user input to complete its condition forecasting and prioritization. A series of operating parameters were developed to create an efficient program that is tailored to the City's needs. Selecting Segments for Rehabilitation The selection of rehabilitation candidates through a worst -first approach or subjective committee input is neither efficient nor cost effective. It is important to establish a set of criteria and determine their importance in the selection process. ESA has defined commonly used criteria within the program that allows different weighting factors to be applied depending on the City's goals. This approach can lead to more objective and effective selection of rehabilitation candidates. • PCI — As mentioned earlier in this section, the results of the pavement condition survey are used to generate a PCI that ranges from 0-100 where 0 is considered the worst and 100 the best. This factor can be given a higher weight to give greater priority to poor condition streets. • Cost of Deferral — As time passes a pavement will deteriorate and require more costly repairs as it ages. ESA can be configured to prioritize streets nearing the point where this cost increase occurs. • Pavement Strength —Through the use of deflection testing or the prevalence of LAD, the relative strength of a pavement can be determined. A prioritization factor can be applied that gives preference to streets that may deteriorate faster in order to apply more cost-effective rehabilitation early in the life cycle. • Pavement Type — Depending on costs, design life, and the City's goals, a weighting factor can be applied based on the materials used to construct the pavement. • Functional Class — Generally higher volume streets are given the greatest priority within a program since they serve the most vehicles. • Planned or Committed Projects — When developing the rehabilitation plan, projects that are already scheduled to be completed are taken into consideration. This is done by adjusting the PCI scores to reflect the expected improvement resulting from these projects. For the City, the weighting factors for these categories were established with the aim of maximizing the cost savings associated with the concept of deferred maintenance and addressing Weak pavements with lower PCI scores. The goal is to minimize the growth of the backlog. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 132 68 Rehabilitation Strategies and Unit Rates The funding requirements for the City are mainly determined by the rehabilitation strategies and unit rates used in the budget analysis. Table 4 presents a breakdown of the costs associated with different pavement rehabilitation activities and their application. The table also suggests a recommended rehabilitation funding sequence based on the cost of deferral. A lower number in this column indicates a higher priority for rehabilitation based on the cost of deferral. The parameters to consider when forming rehabilitation strategies include: • Rehab Activity - This includes the assigned identifier and name of each rehabilitation strategy. Various degrees of slurry sealing are outlined to highlight the increasing cost associated with additional patching requirements for lower PCI streets. • Min, Max, and Critical PCI - The PCI range for the application of a specific rehabilitation activity is determined by the Min and Max values that set the upper and lower limits, while the Critical PCI indicates the threshold at which rehabilitation becomes a higher priority to leverage the cost of deferral factor. There can be overlap in the PCI range to allow for further differentiation based on pavement strength. • Unit Rates - The cost of rehabilitation is presented per square yard for each combination of pavement type, functional class, and rehabilitation activity. A base unit rate is set for the lowest assumed cost of a work type, and it is adjusted for each functional class to account for additional work such as traffic control, intersection improvements, landscaping, utility adjustments, and right-of-way (ROW) infrastructure. IMS worked closely with the City to determine rates that accurately represent the cost of work. Table 4 - Rehabilitation Rates Pave m e nt Type Rehab Activity Critical PCI Min (Need PCI Year) Base Principal Minor Unit Arterial Arterial Rate Unit Unit Max ($/yd2 Rate Rate PCI ) ($/yd2) ($/yd2) Collector Unit Rate ($/yd2) Local Unit Rate ($/yd2) FunCL Rate Premium 110 108 105 103 All Routine Maintenance Asphalt Slurry Seal / Seal Coat Asphalt MicroSurface / Chip Seal Asphalt Edge Hill+�-... g Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0) 85 80 70 60 100 82 73 63 00 0.00 85 4.95 80 7.37 70 24.48 Asphalt EM/FWM+ Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) 50 54 60 32.73 38.00 Asphalt FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 40 44 50 41.25 50.00 Asphalt Surf Recon + Base Rehab / FWM + Strctrl Ptch + Olay Asphalt ACP Full Depth Reconstruction [Concrete PCC Jnt Rehab & Crk Seal Concrete PCC Localized Rehab Concrete PCC Slight Pn! Rplc (<10%) 80! 82 00 9.63 70 73 80 20.63 60 63 70 42.35 Concrete PCC Moderate Pnl Rplcmnt (< 20%) Concrete PCC Extensive Pnl Rplcmnt (<33%) Concrete PCC Partial Reconstruction Concrete PCC Full Depth Reconstruction 50 54 60 64.35 25 0 30 119.90 15 25 180.40 40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.40 5.30 5.20 : 5.10 8.00 8.00 7.75 7.50 27.00 26.25 25.75 25.00 36.50 35.00 34.00 47.50 45.50 43.50 83.00 79.50 76.00 72.00 10.50 110.00 10.25 107.00 10.00 23.75 23.00 22.25 51.00 49.00 46.50 81.50 77.00 72.50 05.00 9.75 21.50 44.50 68.50 8.50 240.00 110.50 144.00 224.00 103.00 96.00 135.00 . 128.00 209.00 194.00 IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 133 69 .2 et ork u ..e nalysis o .'els The pavement management analysis using the ESA system involved combining the condition assessment, deterioration model, prioritization factors, and rehabilitation assignments to conduct a budget analysis. With this information, the program can predict the outcomes of different funding levels or suggest the funds necessary to achieve specific goals. To model network trends and estimate the funding levels needed to reach certain condition and distribution targets, IMS conducted an analysis using a series of budgets. The results of this analysis are detailed in this section. Budget Targets The following scenarios were generated to forecast the outcomes of the current estimated City budget compared to City's target PCI goals over the next five years. The models determine what level of funding may be appropriate going forward. The values for backlog and PCI have been rounded to the nearest whole number to improve legibility. Varying budget figures will have slightly different outcomes that are visible in the charts but may not be completely represented in the legend text. Five-year Models: • Tukwila Budget (Green Line) - This represents the City's current average annual budget of $1.4M/Yr. dedicated to pavement preservation and rehabilitation. This level of funding will result in a network average PCI score of 63 and a backlog of around 11% after five years. • Target PCI Driven (Light -green Line) - The Target PCI model projects the anticipated annual investment needed to increase the average network PCI to 75 over 5 years. The level of funding needed to reach this goal is approximately $4.53M/Yr. and will also reduce the backlog to 3%. • Steady State PCI (Red Line) - This is simply the funds required to maintain the current network average PCI at around 67. The annual budget required to do so is approximately $2.65M/Yr. Backlog will increase to 5% of the network after five years. • PCI Control (Purple Line) - The PCI Control model determines the funding required to maintain the PCI at a minimum level of 65. This budget is $2M/Yr. and will result in a backlog of 8% after five years. • Backlog Control (Purple Dashed Line) - The Backlog Control budget was developed in order to restrict the backlog at 10%. The funding required to achieve this backlog goal is $1.62M/Yr. and will also decrease the PCI to 64 after five years. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 134 70 The results of the analysis are summarized in Figure 16. The x-axis highlights the annual budget, while the y-axis plots the five-year Post Rehab Network Average PCI values. The diagonal blue line is the network trend model developed to show estimated PCI along with a funding range up to $4.6M/Yr. 2025 to 2029 Rehab Analysis Results Target PCI Driven Budget: PCI = 75, Backlog = 3%, Annual Budget = $4.53M/Yr Steady State PCI: Final PCI = 67, Backlog = 5%, Annual Budget = $2.65M/Yr PCI Control Budget: Final PCI = 65, Backlog = 8%, Annual Budget = $2M/Yr - - - - -Backlog Control Budget: Final PCI = 64, Backlog = 10%, Annual Budget = $1.62M/Yr Tukwila, WA Budget: Final PCI = 63, Backlog = 11%, Annual Budget = $1.4M/Yr 80 c 0 0 75 U w bA tt$ >L 70 Q 3 65 tL Z .Q tts tu 60 to 0 a 55 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Annual Budget Each Year for Five Years ($1M/Yr) Figure 16 - Five-year Post Rehab Network PCI Analysis Results IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 135 71 Figure 17 presents the resultant network backlog against the annual budget. It is similar to Figure 16, but instead of plotting the average PCI score, it displays the total backlog after five years with a blue diagonal line. The City currently maintains a backlog of 6%. As the backlog grows, the funding required to return to the current level will increase. Post Rehab Network Percentage Backlog % (PCI < 40) 2025 to 2029 Backlog Analysis Results Target Backlog Driven Budget: PCI = 70, Backlog = 4%, Annual Budget = $3.42M/Yr Steady State PCI: Final PCI = 67, Backlog = 5%, Annual Budget = $2.65M/Yr - ® Maintain Current Backlog: Final PCI = 66, Backlog = 6%, Annual Budget = $2.44M/Yr PCI Control Budget: Final PCI = 65, Backlog = 8%, Annual Budget = $2M/Yr - m Backlog Control Budget: Final PCI = 64, Backlog = 10%, Annual Budget = $1.62M/Yr Tukwila, WA Budget: Final PCI = 63, Backlog = 11 %, Annual Budget = $1.4M/Yr 0.00 1.00 2.00 Annual Budget Each Year for Five Years ($1M/Yr) 3.00 Figure 17 - Five-year Post Rehab Network Backlog Results IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 136 72 Figure 18 presents the analysis results on an annual basis. This shows that if the budget falls below $2.65M/Yr. (Steady State PCI Budget), over time the overall condition of the roads is expected to deteriorate as the backlog grows. Network Average Pavement Condition Index 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 Fix All Budget = $41.7M Over 5 Years Target PCI Driven Budget: PCI = 75, Backlog = 3%, Annual Budget = $4.53M/Yr Steady State PCI: Final PCI = 67, Backlog = 5%, Annual Budget = $2.65M/Yr PCI Control Budget: Final PCI = 65, Backlog = 8%, Annual Budget = $2M/Yr Backlog Control Budget: Final PCI = 64, Backlog = 10%, Annual Budget = $1.62M/Yr Tukwila, WA Budget: Final PCI = 63, Backlog = 11%, Annual Budget = $1.4M/Yr Do Nothing 2024 2025 2026 Year 2027 Figure 18 - Five-year Annual PCI 2028 2029 IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 137 73 5,3 Post Rehab^UUtat^on Condition Figure 19 compares the percentage of the City's network area separated into each pavement condition category for two scenarios: the current network average condition (shown in red) and the projected condition infive years with the Cit/s budget (shown in blue). The analysis shows that ifthe City's current budget is maintained, the average PO is expected to decrease to 63 by the end of the five'yearana|ysisperiod'andtheback|ngispro|ectedtoincreasetoapproxirnate|y1196. SO Percentage of Network By Area 40 30 20 lU 0 Current Network Average Condition =6J\Backlog =6/% m Post Rehab Network Average Condition =63,Backlog =11'2% VPom Poor Marginal Fair Good (0 to25) (25to40 (40 to50) (50to60 k60 to70 Pavement Condition Using Descriptive Terms VGood Excellent Figure 19 - Comparison of Pavement Condition (Current to 5-year Projection) 5°4 Summary The pavement analysis models conducted using the ESA program showed that the current annual budget of$1.4M for pavement management would result in a decrease in pavement condition over a period of five years, resulting in a five-year post rehab PCI of 63 and a backlog of 11 %. Maintaining the current PCI level at 67 would require an annual budget of approximately $2.65M and reduce the backlog toS96. mmPavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 138 74 6.0 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS & CON MENTS • .1 roject u ary an - eco en ations A pavement condition survey was performed in July 2024 on the full City pavement network. The results of the condition survey were aggregated into the ESA pavement management system. This system facilitated the creation of a georeferenced pavement inventory, enabled the development of a precise model of the network's current condition and anticipated future deterioration, and provided recommendations for funding to meet various level -of -service goals. The following broad recommendations are presented to the City as an output from the pavement analysis and must be read in conjunction with the previous sections. • The City should make efforts to keep the ESA spreadsheet up to date. By maintaining and updating the rehabilitation unit rates, work history of the segments, and accuracy of the inventory, the City will be able to reliably forecast funding needs for future years. This allows the City to be proactive in maintaining the condition of the pavement network at an acceptable level. • The City should periodically resurvey the pavement network. Pavement performance over time involves many variables, such as traffic volumes, environmental factors, maintenance timing, and design standards. As these variables change, the rate at which a pavement deteriorates will change with them. The periodic resurvey of pavement conditions allows the City to track these changes and update models accordingly, ensuring that appropriate rehabilitation measures are being planned. • The City should investigate new and additional rehabilitation activities. Advancements in pavement rehabilitation technology are constantly being made, and it is recommended that the City periodically update its planned rehabilitation activities in the ESA program to take advantage of these advances. • The City should strive to maintain or better its current condition if possible. Maintaining a pavement network in good condition is more cost-effective than restoring conditions after deterioration. The City's current pavement network has an overall PCI of 67 with a backlog value of 6%. If the current annual budget of $1.4M is maintained, the models show the PCI will decrease to 63 and the backlog will hover around 11 % after five years. .2 Closin The IMS Team greatly appreciates the opportunity to work with the City on this pavement management update. Over the course of this project, the team has observed the City staff's dedication to offering the best possible service to their community. IMS stands ready to assist the City with training and technical support as necessary and welcomes the opportunity to work with the City on future pavement management projects. IMS Pavement Management Report Tukwila, WA 2024 Page 139 75 Appendix A Street Inventory and Condition Summary by Segment 76 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1810 16th Ave S CITY LIMIT CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial Concrete 54 892 268 5,621 90 63 60 V Good 80 1957 27th Ave S S 102nd St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 24 1,756 234 4,917 80 72 60 V Good 77 1792 32nd Ave S S 135th St S 136th St Local Asphalt 20 319 35 744 83 58 60 V Good 74 1791 32nd Ave S S 137th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 20 135 15 315 85 62 60 V Good 77 1787 32nd Ave S S 130th St S 133rd St Local Asphalt 19 763 81 1,691 95 55 60 V Good 82 2013 32nd Ave S S 133rd St S 133rd Ln Local Asphalt 19 306 32 679 89 72 60 V Good 83 1786 32nd Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local Asphalt 19 274 29 606 90 69 60 V Good 83 2011 32nd Ave S S 133rd Ln S 135th St Local Asphalt 19 345 36 766 87 82 60 Excellent 85 1446 33rd Ave S S 130th St S 132nd St Local Asphalt 19 755 80 1,674 69 56 60 Good 64 1447 33rd Ave S S 140th St 34th PI S Local Asphalt 19 993 105 2,202 92 70 60 V Good 84 1582 33rd PI S NW END S 130th St Local Asphalt 20 326 36 760 56 46 60 Fair 52 1463 33rd PI S 33rd PI S 33rd PI S Local Asphalt 19 130 14 289 99 11 80 Good 69 1474 33rd PI S S 140th St S 141st St Local Asphalt 20 358 40 836 96 50 60 V Good 80 1205 34th Ave S S 144th St Military Rd S Local Asphalt 22 582 71 1,493 45 61 60 Fair 49 1208 34th Ave S S 130th St S 132nd St Local Asphalt 25 693 96 2,020 50 54 60 Fair 50 1207 34th Ave S S 126th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 24 628 84 1,758 59 51 60 Fair 55 1204 34th Ave S 33rd Ave S S 144th St Local Asphalt 29 511 82 1,730 87 61 60 V Good 78 1211 34th Ave S S 132nd St S 133rd St Local Asphalt 25 285 40 832 84 69 60 V Good 79 1206 34th Ave S S 133rd St S 135th St Local Asphalt 30 664 111 2,324 86 73 60 V Good 81 1203 34th Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local Asphalt 28 286 44 933 88 69 60 V Good 82 1212 34th Ave S S 137th St S 140th St Local Asphalt 28 1,067 166 3,486 91 74 60 Excellent 85 1210 34th Ave S S 135th St S 136th St Local Asphalt 28 327 51 1,069 93 73 60 Excellent 86 1209 34th PI S S 141st St 33rd Ave S Local Asphalt 25 478 66 1,395 66 53 60 Good 61 1236 35th Ave S S 133rd St S 135th St Local Asphalt 32 663 118 2,475 31 47 60 Poor 36 1233 35th Ave S S 146th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 30 294 49 1,029 42 50 60 Marginal 43 1099 35th Ave S S 128th St S 130th St Local Asphalt 21 636 74 1,559 50 42 60 Marginal 46 1730 35th Ave S S 132nd St S 133rd St Local Asphalt 32 441 78 1,648 62 45 60 Fair 56 1733 35th Ave S S 126th St S 128th St Local Asphalt 22 423 52 1,085 62 62 60 Good 61 1235 35th Ave S S 140th St S 142nd PI Local Asphalt 29 833 134 2,819 84 57 60 V Good 75 1732 35th Ave S S 124th St S 126th St Local Asphalt 21 869 101 2,130 82 69 60 V Good 77 1234 35th Ave S S 135th St S 137th St Local Asphalt 28 592 92 1,934 94 69 60 Excellent 86 1741 35th Ln S S 130th St S 132nd St Local Asphalt 19 483 51 1,070 17 0 80 V Poor 11 1064 37th Ave S S 128th St S 130th St Local Asphalt 22 621 76 1,595 29 52 60 Poor 36 2008 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd S 135th St Local Asphalt 25 652 91 1,902 44 59 60 Marginal 48 1071 37th Ave S S 135th St S 137th St Local Asphalt 32 590 105 2,203 76 70 60 V Good 73 1066 37th Ave S S 137th St S 138th St Local Asphalt 32 321 57 1,200 77 68 60 V Good 73 1107 37th Ave S S 126th St S 128th St Local Asphalt 19 434 46 962 83 61 60 V Good 75 1072 37th Ave S S 132nd St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 30 347 58 1,214 91 51 60 V Good 78 1068 37th Ave S S 138th St S 140th St Local Asphalt 32 721 128 2,692 84 69 60 V Good 79 1065 37th Ave S S 130th St S 132nd St Local Asphalt 30 418 70 1,462 82 85 60 V Good 83 1069 37th Ave S S 142nd St S 142nd PI Local Asphalt 26 156 23 473 92 70 60 V Good 84 1063 37th Ave S S 141st St S 142nd St Local Asphalt 24 461 61 1,290 96 72 60 Excellent 88 1067 37th Ave S S 140th St S 141st St Local Asphalt 32 230 41 858 97 73 60 Excellent 89 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 77 page 1 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1070 37th Ave S S 142nd PI S 144th St Local Asphalt 26 502 72 1,522 97 74 60 Excellent 89 1308 38th Ave S S 130th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 22 603 74 1,547 31 72 30 Marginal 44 1309 38th Ave S S 138th St S 140th St Local Asphalt 30 632 105 2,213 92 66 60 V Good 82 2094 38th Ln S S 130th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 24 169 23 474 75 49 80 Good 66 1006 38th Ln S 38th Ln S 38th Ln S Local Asphalt 19 162 17 360 90 20 80 Good 66 1918 38th PI S NORTH END S 132nd PI Local Asphalt 20 163 18 379 17 9 60 V Poor 14 1970 39th Ave S S 116th St S 117th St Local Asphalt 22 294 36 754 90 71 60 V Good 83 1842 40th Ave S S 114th St S 115th St Local Asphalt 19 310 33 686 21 18 80 V Poor 19 1379 40th Ave S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Local Asphalt 24 632 84 1,769 31 45 60 Poor 35 1143 40th Ave S S 126th St S 128th St Local Asphalt 25 317 44 924 65 43 60 Fair 56 1256 40th Ave S Southcenter Blvd S 154th Ln Local Asphalt 25 142 20 414 73 30 80 Fair 58 1825 40th Ave S East Marginal Way S S 132nd PI Collector Asphalt 26 881 127 2,672 61 69 60 Good 63 1861 40th Ave S Interurban PI S Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 25 109 15 318 84 26 80 Good 64 2096 40th Ave S S 132nd PI 42nd Ave S Collector Asphalt 27 1,544 232 4,863 66 72 60 Good 67 1254 40th Ave S S 154th Ln DS@337S S 154th Ln Local Asphalt 25 337 47 983 96 42 60 V Good 78 1855 40th Ave S S 117th PI Interurban PI S Local Asphalt 24 480 64 1,345 85 70 60 V Good 79 1169 40th Ave S NORTH END S 116th PI Local Asphalt 20 243 27 568 91 66 60 V Good 82 1831 40th Ave S S 116th PI S 117th St Local Asphalt 24 202 27 565 92 71 60 V Good 84 1156 40th Ave S S 117th St S 117th PI Local Asphalt 25 181 25 528 95 67 60 Excellent 85 1953 40th PI S NORTH END S 119th St Local Asphalt 25 262 36 765 86 50 60 V Good 73 1178 41 st Ave S S 113th St S 114th St Local Asphalt 26 240 35 729 69 23 80 Fair 53 1180 41st Ave S S 130th St S 131st PI Local Asphalt 25 421 58 1,228 87 65 60 V Good 79 1181 41st Ave S NORTH END S 139th St Local Asphalt 24 588 78 1,646 90 67 60 V Good 82 1647 42nd Ave S S 124th St Macadam Rd S Collector Asphalt 28 1,063 165 3,473 32 63 30 Marginal 41 1517 42nd Ave S S 115th St S 116th St Collector Asphalt 34 152 29 604 52 59 80 Fair 53 1860 42nd Ave S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Collector Asphalt 29 349 56 1,180 62 65 60 Good 62 1515 42nd Ave S S 144th St S 146th St Collector Asphalt 31 666 115 2,408 63 70 60 Good 64 1859 42nd Ave S S 151st St S 152nd St Collector Asphalt 28 362 56 1,182 67 68 80 Good 66 1516 42nd Ave S 40th Ave S S 139th St Collector Asphalt 25 794 110 2,315 65 74 60 Good 67 1521 42nd Ave S S 116th St Pedestrian Bridge S 119th St Access Collector Asphalt 35 1,145 223 4,677 66 76 60 Good 69 1163 42nd Ave S S 146th St S 148th St Collector Asphalt 32 661 118 2,469 65 79 60 Good 69 1523 42nd Ave S S 150th St S 151st St Collector Asphalt 29 305 49 1,031 72 67 60 V Good 70 1389 42nd Ave S S 148th St S 150th St Collector Asphalt 28 661 103 2,160 67 78 60 V Good 70 1648 42nd Ave S Southcenter Blvd S 158th St Collector Asphalt 28 1,648 256 5,383 73 69 60 V Good 71 1179 42nd Ave S S 126th St SE END Local Asphalt 25 164 23 478 81 56 60 V Good 72 1195 42nd Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Collector Asphalt 25 713 99 2,079 74 74 60 V Good 74 1663 42nd Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Collector Asphalt 31 646 111 2,337 81 69 60 V Good 77 1557 42nd Ave S Pedestrian Bridge S 119th St Access S 122nd St Collector Asphalt 25 987 137 2,879 78 80 60 V Good 78 1639 42nd Ave S S 158th St S 160th St Collector Asphalt 29 654 105 2,211 86 67 60 V Good 79 1388 42nd Ave S S 140th St S 141st St Collector Asphalt 30 318 53 1,113 89 64 60 V Good 80 1196 42nd Ave S S 139th St S 140th St Collector Asphalt 26 281 41 852 91 70 60 V Good 84 1530 42nd Ave S S 141st St S 142nd St Collector Asphalt 30 362 60 1,268 95 62 60 V Good 84 1524 42nd Ave S S 139th St S 139th St Collector Asphalt 32 41 7 153 97 61 60 Excellent 84 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 78 page 2 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1519 42nd Ave S S 140th St S 140th St Collector Asphalt 28 38 6 123 99 69 60 Excellent 88 1963 43rd Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St Local Asphalt 27 671 101 2,113 63 47 60 Fair 57 1962 43rd Ave S Macadam Rd S SOUTH END Local Asphalt 26 814 118 2,468 66 52 60 Good 61 1961 43rd Ave S NORTH END S 160th St Local Asphalt 29 352 57 1,191 73 41 60 Good 62 1964 43rd Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local Asphalt 25 713 99 2,078 73 86 60 V Good 77 1972 43rd PI S S 137th St S 137th PI Local Asphalt 23 375 48 1,005 85 49 60 V Good 72 1748 43rd PI S S 116th St 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 30 340 57 1,189 94 59 60 V Good 82 1795 44th Ave S S 131st PI S 133rd St Local Asphalt 23 293 37 787 55 55 60 Fair 54 1788 44th Ave S S 137th St S 139th St Local Asphalt 19 641 68 1,421 62 51 80 Fair 58 1790 44th Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St Local Asphalt 19 650 69 1,440 70 67 60 Good 69 1796 44th Ave S 43rd PI S S 118th St Local Asphalt 19 535 56 1,185 72 71 60 V Good 71 1793 44th Ave S S 118th St S 122nd St Local Asphalt 20 1,407 156 3,284 72 72 60 V Good 71 1789 44th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local Asphalt 23 710 91 1,904 79 74 60 V Good 77 2021 44th Ave S S 156th St S 158th St Local Asphalt 19 475 50 1,052 90 64 60 V Good 81 1260 44th PI S S 118th St 46th Ave S Local Asphalt 19 705 74 1,562 82 64 60 V Good 76 1266 44th PI S 46th Ave S S 122nd St Local Asphalt 19 1,145 121 2,538 83 66 60 V Good 77 1399 45th Ave S S 137th St S 139th St Local Asphalt 26 766 111 2,324 58 44 60 Fair 52 1247 45th Ave S S 139th St S 140th St Local Asphalt 23 209 27 560 63 41 80 Fair 55 1897 45th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local Asphalt 26 711 103 2,157 79 64 60 V Good 74 1217 45th PI S 45th PI S DS@65S 45th PI S Local Asphalt 26 65 9 198 94 0 80 Good 62 1231 45th PI S DS@65S 45th PI S 45th PI S Local Asphalt 25 60 8 174 75 39 80 Good 63 1232 45th PI S S 163rd PI SOUTH END Local Asphalt 25 150 21 437 74 52 60 Good 66 1230 45th PI S S 136th St S 137th St Local Asphalt 24 277 37 776 84 49 60 V Good 72 1782 46th Ave S S 146th St S 148th St Local Asphalt 20 659 73 1,538 30 51 60 Poor 36 1277 46th Ave S S 148th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 19 220 23 487 34 53 30 Marginal 39 1781 46th Ave S S 144th St S 146th St Local Asphalt 20 666 74 1,554 48 50 60 Marginal 47 1836 46th Ave S S 160th St S 162nd St Local Asphalt 21 603 70 1,477 59 43 60 Fair 52 1914 46th Ave S S 163rd PI S 162nd St Local Asphalt 25 132 18 384 76 29 80 Good 59 1276 46th Ave S NORTH END S 150th St Local Asphalt 19 304 32 674 73 49 80 Good 65 1783 46th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local Asphalt 23 712 91 1,911 80 56 60 V Good 72 1275 46th Ave S 44th PI S S 122nd St Local Asphalt 21 870 102 2,132 83 77 60 V Good 81 1274 46th Ave S S 124th St S 125th St Local Asphalt 24 176 23 493 90 71 60 V Good 83 1832 47th Ave S S Ryan Way S 109th St Local Asphalt 22 642 79 1,649 20 48 60 Poor 28 1383 47th Ave S NE END S 134th PI Local Asphalt 25 292 41 851 38 24 80 Poor 32 1385 47th Ave S S 104th PI S 107th St Local Asphalt 22 744 91 1,908 34 49 60 Poor 38 1846 47th Ave S S 160th St S 162nd St Local Asphalt 25 608 84 1,774 56 43 60 Fair 51 1828 47th Ave S CITY LIMIT S 104th PI Local Asphalt 21 229 27 560 51 62 60 Fair 54 1142 47th Ave S S 156th St S 158th St Local Asphalt 26 510 74 1,547 76 65 60 V Good 72 1840 47th Ave S S 158th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 24 579 77 1,621 86 57 60 V Good 76 1856 47th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local Asphalt 21 713 83 1,747 83 72 60 V Good 79 1448 48th Ave S S 162nd St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 19 165 17 366 43 7 80 Poor 30 1452 48th Ave S S 160th St S 162nd St Local Asphalt 19 601 63 1,332 65 50 80 Good 59 1453 48th Ave S NORTH END S 109th St Local Asphalt 19 308 33 684 60 74 30 Good 64 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 79 page 3 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1109 48th Ave S NE END S 134th PI Local Asphalt 23 118 15 317 79 48 60 Good 68 1451 48th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local Asphalt 19 714 75 1,583 74 62 60 Good 69 1110 48th Ave S NE END Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 25 2,049 285 5,975 75 70 60 V Good 73 1111 48th Ave S S 134th PI 48th PI S Local Asphalt 19 222 23 492 86 50 60 V Good 73 1449 48th Ave S 48th PI S Macadam Rd S Local Asphalt 19 437 46 968 86 65 60 V Good 78 1050 48th PI S 48th PI S DS@85N 48th PI S Local Asphalt 25 85 12 247 69 0 80 Marginal 45 1049 48th PI S DS@85N 48th PI S 48th PI S Local Asphalt 24 89 12 248 80 13 80 Fair 57 1047 48th PI S S 145th St NW END Local Asphalt 24 191 25 534 85 33 80 Good 67 1051 48th PI S 48th Ave S S 136th St Local Asphalt 19 291 31 645 90 47 60 V Good 76 1048 48th PI S S 146th St S 145th St Local Asphalt 19 240 25 532 88 63 60 V Good 79 1666 49th Ave S NORTH END S 164th St Local Asphalt 27 405 61 1,276 50 35 80 Marginal 44 1667 49th Ave S S 122nd St S 124th St Local Asphalt 26 714 103 2,166 82 69 60 V Good 77 1699 49th Ave S S 107th St S 114th St Local Asphalt 25 2,254 313 6,574 94 70 60 Excellent 86 1808 50th Ave S NORTH END S 112th St Local Asphalt 19 273 29 605 78 60 60 V Good 71 1809 50th Ave S 51st PIS S 122nd Ln Local Asphalt 20 499 55 1,165 89 54 60 V Good 76 1146 50th PI S S 125th St S 130th PI Collector Asphalt 35 977 190 3,989 23 61 60 Poor 34 1386 50th PI S S 124th St S 125th St Collector Asphalt 35 257 50 1,051 43 61 60 Marginal 47 2058 51st Ave S SR 518 Ramp 1-5 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 279 46 976 36 67 60 Marginal 45 1044 51st Ave S S 144th St S 151st St Collector Asphalt 35 2,319 451 9,469 41 61 60 Marginal 46 1951 51st Ave S S 151st St S 152nd St Collector Asphalt 35 329 64 1,344 50 91 30 Good 63 1200 51st Ave S S 139th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 21 487 57 1,193 69 54 60 Good 64 1046 51st Ave S NORTH END S 159th St Local Asphalt 25 424 59 1,236 69 55 80 Good 64 1045 51st Ave S S 160th St S 161st St Collector Asphalt 35 284 55 1,158 70 64 60 Good 67 1201 51st Ave S S 163rd PI S 164th St Collector Asphalt 35 200 39 817 76 74 60 V Good 75 1949 51st Ave S S 161st St S 163rd PI Collector Asphalt 35 702 137 2,867 76 80 60 V Good 77 1952 51st Ave S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Collector Asphalt 34 569 108 2,258 76 81 60 V Good 77 1202 51st Ave S S 164th St S 166th St Collector Asphalt 35 621 121 2,535 78 79 60 V Good 78 1950 51st Ave S NORTH END S 138th St Local Asphalt 22 722 88 1,852 91 77 60 Excellent 86 1199 51st Ave S S 138th St S 139th St Local Asphalt 20 338 38 789 100 60 60 Excellent 86 2051 51st Ave S SR 518 SR 518 Ramp Minor Arterial Concrete 30 192 32 673 100 67 60 Excellent 89 1653 51st Ave S Southcenter Blvd SR 518 Ramp Minor Arterial Concrete 30 291 48 1,017 100 71 60 Excellent 90 2099 51st PI S S 122nd Ln S 124th St Local Asphalt 20 128 14 300 56 66 60 Fair 58 1060 51st PI S S 124th St SE END Local Asphalt 20 815 91 1,903 80 65 60 V Good 75 1670 51st PI S 50th Ave S S 122nd Ln Local Asphalt 20 586 65 1,367 84 63 60 V Good 76 1700 51st PIS S 122nd St 50th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 199 22 464 87 58 60 V Good 77 1325 52nd Ave S NORTH END S 142nd St Local Asphalt 22 269 33 692 64 32 80 Fair 52 1324 52nd Ave S 53rd Ave S S 136th St Local Asphalt 22 268 33 687 72 59 60 Good 67 1331 52nd Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local Asphalt 22 294 36 756 77 49 60 Good 67 1326 52nd Ave S Interurban Ave S 53rd Ave S Local Asphalt 20 288 32 673 94 37 60 V Good 75 1329 52nd Ave S NORTH END S 164th St Local Asphalt 21 173 20 424 86 59 60 V Good 77 1327 52nd Ave S S 151st St Southcenter Blvd Local Asphalt 21 914 107 2,240 84 67 60 V Good 78 1328 52nd Ave S S 137th St S 138th St Local Asphalt 22 261 32 669 93 53 60 V Good 79 1330 52nd Ave S S 142nd St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 22 333 41 856 97 67 60 Excellent 87 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 80 page 4 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1594 52nd PIS 52nd Ave S S 137th St Local Asphalt 21 261 31 641 69 70 60 Good 69 1113 53rd Ave S S 170th St S 172nd Lc Local Asphalt 22 863 105 2,215 45 56 60 Marginal 47 1112 53rd Ave S Klickitat Dr S 159th St Collector Asphalt 27 519 78 1,635 62 73 60 Good 65 1114 53rd Ave S S 159th St S 160th St Collector Asphalt 28 552 86 1,802 66 70 60 Good 66 1116 53rd Ave S S 166th St S 170th St Local Asphalt 22 1,112 136 2,854 70 68 60 Good 68 2163 53rd Ave S Southcenter Blvd DS@355S Southcenter Blvd Local Asphalt 22 355 43 912 76 72 60 V Good 74 1890 53rd Ave S S 139th St S 140th St Collector Asphalt 35 303 59 1,237 94 63 60 V Good 83 1174 53rd Ave S S 140th St S 142nd St Collector Asphalt 34 621 117 2,464 89 75 60 V Good 84 1891 53rd Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Collector Asphalt 33 787 144 3,028 90 77 60 Excellent 85 1115 53rd Ave S 52nd Ave S S 136th St Local Asphalt 21 274 32 672 100 57 60 Excellent 85 1117 53rd Ave S S 137th St S 139th St Collector Asphalt 35 484 94 1,977 96 73 60 Excellent 87 1889 53rd Ave S S 136th St S 137th St Local Asphalt 21 213 25 522 95 100 60 Excellent 95 1684 53rd PI S 53rd PI S SPUR 53rd PI S SPUR Local Asphalt 36 48 10 200 33 46 60 Poor 37 1250 53rd PI S 53rd PI S 53rd PI S Local Asphalt 21 151 18 371 59 22 80 Marginal 45 1736 53rd PI S Slade Way 53rd PI S SPUR Local Asphalt 22 410 50 1,053 74 57 60 Good 68 1683 53rd PI S 53rd PI S SPUR SW END Local Asphalt 21 168 20 413 87 59 60 V Good 77 1971 53rd PI S SPUR 53rd PI S 53rd PI S Local Asphalt 21 176 20 430 77 20 80 Fair 58 1487 54th Ave S Slade Way S 166th St Local Asphalt 22 965 118 2,477 91 55 60 V Good 78 1475 55th Ave S S 140th St S 144th St Local Asphalt 20 1,418 158 3,308 37 48 60 Marginal 40 1411 56th Ave S S 139th St S 141st St Local Asphalt 20 712 79 1,662 55 47 60 Fair 51 1408 56th Ave S S 137th St 56th PI S Local Asphalt 20 761 85 1,776 57 71 60 Good 61 1407 56th Ave S S 130th PI S 133rd St Local Asphalt 20 784 87 1,829 75 57 60 Good 68 1410 56th Ave S S 141st St S 144th St Local Asphalt 21 1,048 122 2,568 77 57 60 V Good 69 1409 56th Ave S S 133rd St Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 20 1,195 133 2,789 79 55 60 V Good 71 1406 56th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Local Asphalt 21 1,016 119 2,489 83 56 60 V Good 73 1992 56th PI S 56th Ave S S 141st St Local Asphalt 21 768 90 1,882 86 52 60 V Good 75 1403 57th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Local Asphalt 23 975 125 2,617 14 60 60 Poor 29 1568 57th Ave S S 141st St S 142nd St Local Asphalt 22 319 39 819 33 59 60 Marginal 41 1566 57th Ave S S 150th PI SOUTH END Local Asphalt 23 232 30 622 41 50 60 Marginal 43 1571 57th Ave S S 152nd St S 152nd PI Local Asphalt 23 320 41 859 49 50 60 Marginal 48 2162 57th Ave S SW END Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 22 199 24 512 69 28 80 Fair 55 1402 57th Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Local Asphalt 22 668 82 1,716 55 67 60 Fair 59 1570 57th Ave S Pamela Dr S 133rd St Local Asphalt 21 335 39 820 80 60 60 V Good 73 1567 57th Ave S S 149th St S 150th PI Local Asphalt 23 533 68 1,429 84 54 60 V Good 74 1569 57th Ave S S 130th PI Pamela Dr Local Asphalt 21 378 44 927 80 66 60 V Good 75 1572 57th Ave S S 147th St S 149th St Local Asphalt 23 518 66 1,389 95 69 60 Excellent 86 1227 58th Ave S 59th Ave S S 144th St Collector Asphalt 35 668 130 2,726 65 69 60 Good 65 1226 58th Ave S Interurban Ave S 59th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 577 112 2,354 77 51 60 Good 68 1224 58th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Collector Asphalt 35 975 190 3,981 70 71 60 V Good 70 1362 59th Aly S S 147th St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 19 643 68 1,426 38 31 60 Poor 35 1644 59th Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Local Asphalt 21 997 116 2,442 60 46 60 Fair 55 1738 59th Ave S S 142nd St S 144th St Local Asphalt 20 928 103 2,165 64 50 60 Fair 58 1824 59th Ave S S 147th St S 149th St Local Asphalt 22 611 75 1,567 82 66 60 V Good 77 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 81 page 5 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1969 61 st Ave S Southcenter Blvd Tukwila Pkwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 40 587 130 2,738 15 59 30 Poor 28 1004 62nd Ave S S 151st St DS@131S S 151st St Local Asphalt 20 131 15 305 6 37 60 V Poor 16 1093 62nd Ave S S 149th St S 149th PI Collector Asphalt 35 278 54 1,136 70 62 60 Good 66 1094 62nd Ave S S 149th PI S 151st St Collector Asphalt 34 416 79 1,652 66 71 60 Good 67 1096 62nd Ave S S 153rd St Sunwood Blvd Local Asphalt 20 158 18 369 80 47 80 Good 68 1091 62nd Ave S Sunwood Blvd Southcenter Blvd Local Asphalt 20 750 83 1,749 77 52 60 Good 68 1095 62nd Ave S 59th Ave S S 149th St Collector Asphalt 33 816 150 3,140 69 71 60 Good 69 1558 63rd PIS S 151st St S 151st PI Local Asphalt 22 174 21 447 81 66 60 V Good 76 1216 64th Ave S S 153rd St SOUTH END Local Asphalt 22 321 39 825 81 65 60 V Good 75 1040 65th Ave S S 153rd St Southcenter Blvd Collector Asphalt 35 951 185 3,885 61 63 60 Good 61 1041 65th Ave S S 151st St S 153rd St Collector Asphalt 35 916 178 3,738 76 72 60 V Good 74 1198 65th Ave S S 153rd St S 153rd St Collector Asphalt 34 128 24 506 84 69 60 V Good 78 1955 66th Ave S Southcenter Blvd 1-405 Ramp Minor Arterial Concrete 35 246 48 1,003 100 53 60 V Good 84 1651 Airport Way S DS@581E Boeing Access Rd Boeing Access Rd Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 641 114 2,392 9 67 60 Poor 27 1640 Airport Way S Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 625 111 2,334 20 61 60 Poor 33 1641 Airport Way S DS@355S CITY LIMIT Boeing Access Rd Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 584 97 2,044 56 60 60 Fair 56 1514 Airport Way S CITY LIMIT Boeing Access Rd Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 1,068 178 3,737 53 71 60 Fair 58 1848 Airport Way S Airport Way S Boeing Access Rd Minor Arterial Concrete 30 982 164 3,436 84 67 60 V Good 78 1560 Airport Way S Boeing Access Rd DS@581E Boeing Access Rd Minor Arterial Concrete 32 581 103 2,168 88 65 60 V Good 80 1166 Airport Way S CITY LIMIT DS@355S CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial Concrete 44 355 87 1,824 85 70 60 V Good 80 1713 Andover Park E Costco Dr S 180th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 1,022 182 3,816 56 75 60 Good 62 1710 Andover Park E Strander Blvd Treck Dr Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 715 119 2,504 68 61 60 Good 65 1712 Andover Park E Evans Black Dr Baker Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 465 78 1,628 69 67 60 Good 67 1711 Andover Park E Treck Dr Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 1,934 344 7,221 68 75 60 V Good 69 1714 Andover Park E Minkler Blvd Costco Dr Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 1,473 262 5,499 71 81 60 V Good 74 1708 Andover Park E Baker Blvd Strander Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 876 146 3,067 81 63 60 V Good 74 1709 Andover Park E Tukwila Pkwy Evans Black Dr Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 782 130 2,738 81 70 60 V Good 77 1901 Andover Park W Strander Blvd Corporate Dr N Minor Arterial Asphalt 33 1,852 340 7,132 42 62 60 Marginal 47 1240 Andover Park W Corporate Dr N Corporate Dr S Minor Arterial Asphalt 33 518 95 1,993 46 62 60 Fair 50 1983 Andover Park W Corporate Dr S Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 33 235 43 903 54 60 60 Fair 55 1237 Andover Park W Upland Dr Midland Dr Collector Asphalt 35 756 147 3,087 54 73 60 Good 60 1980 Andover Park W Minkler Blvd Upland Dr Minor Arterial Asphalt 33 421 77 1,622 62 61 60 Good 61 1979 Andover Park W Minkler Blvd Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 33 51 9 196 78 43 60 Good 66 1238 Andover Park W Triland Dr S 180th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 620 103 2,169 67 68 60 Good 66 1902 Andover Park W Baker Blvd Strander Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 871 155 3,253 72 63 60 Good 68 1982 Andover Park W Midland Dr Triland Dr Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 845 141 2,957 73 72 60 V Good 72 2062 Andover Park W Tukwila Pkwy Southcenter Mall Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 327 58 1,222 75 71 60 V Good 73 1984 Andover Park W Southcenter Mall Baker Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 32 843 150 3,149 86 71 60 V Good 80 1694 B Line Southcenter Pkwy C Line Local Asphalt 20 271 30 633 69 70 60 Good 69 1042 Baker Blvd Andover Park W Andover Park E Local Asphalt 20 1,080 120 2,521 58 71 60 Good 61 1102 Baker Blvd Andover Park E Christensen Rd Local Asphalt 20 343 38 801 74 63 80 V Good 69 1632 Beacon Ave S S Ryan Way S 107th St Local Asphalt 22 943 115 2,420 58 59 60 Fair 57 1630 Beacon Ave S CITY LIMIT S Ryan Way Local Asphalt 20 60 7 140 83 32 80 Good 65 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 82 page 6 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1975 Boeing Access Rd Martin L King Jr Ramp Martin L King Jr Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 292 71 1,498 31 48 60 Poor 36 1753 Boeing Access Rd DS@220E East Marginal Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 113 28 581 29 67 60 Marginal 40 1977 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 330 81 1,695 30 72 60 Marginal 42 1752 Boeing Access Rd East Marginal Way S DS@220E East Marginal Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 220 54 1,132 35 75 30 Marginal 47 1978 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 377 92 1,933 39 75 30 Fair 49 1755 Boeing Access Rd 1-5 Ramp Martin L King Jr Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 42 395 92 1,937 44 80 60 Fair 54 1754 Boeing Access Rd 1-5 Ramp Airport Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 168 41 862 55 63 60 Fair 56 1749 Boeing Access Rd Airport Way S Airport Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 224 55 1,151 53 76 60 Good 59 1976 Boeing Access Rd East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 176 43 902 79 62 60 V Good 73 1751 Boeing Access Rd East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 592 145 3,038 78 70 60 V Good 75 1974 Boeing Access Rd East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 173 42 886 87 67 60 V Good 79 1973 Boeing Access Rd 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Ramp Principal Arterial Concrete 44 492 120 2,526 100 61 60 Excellent 86 1750 Boeing Access Rd 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Ramp Principal Arterial Concrete 44 371 91 1,905 100 64 60 Excellent 88 1772 C Line UnNamed-01534 Southcenter Pkwy Local Asphalt 20 730 81 1,703 21 61 30 Poor 33 1698 Cascade Ave S Riverside Dr Todd Blvd Local Asphalt 20 864 96 2,017 62 71 60 Good 64 1697 Cascade Ave S Todd Blvd S Glacier St Local Asphalt 20 738 82 1,722 75 79 60 V Good 76 1176 Christensen Rd Strander Blvd Christensen Rd Local Asphalt 19 802 85 1,777 48 57 60 Fair 50 1734 Christensen Rd NORTH END Baker Blvd Local Asphalt 20 1,253 139 2,924 64 66 80 Good 64 1395 Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Local Asphalt 19 82 9 183 94 34 80 V Good 74 1177 Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Christensen Rd Local Asphalt 19 82 9 182 97 31 60 V Good 75 1175 Christensen Rd Baker Blvd Christensen Rd Local Asphalt 19 249 26 552 84 72 60 V Good 79 1149 Corporate Dr N Corporate Dr N Corporate Dr N Local Asphalt 19 206 22 457 91 40 80 V Good 73 1150 Corporate Dr N WEST END Andover Park W Local Asphalt 19 424 45 939 87 70 60 V Good 81 1577 Corporate Dr S Corporate Dr S Corporate Dr S Local Asphalt 20 203 23 474 44 27 60 Poor 38 1249 Corporate Dr S WEST END Andover Park W Local Asphalt 20 427 47 997 51 66 60 Fair 56 1001 Costco Dr Andover Park E DS@280E Andover Park E Local Asphalt 20 280 31 652 62 67 60 Good 63 1010 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd S 112th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 1,358 226 4,752 28 61 60 Poor 38 2092 East Marginal Way S Interurban Ave S SR 599 Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 312 52 1,090 32 52 60 Poor 38 1869 East Marginal Way S S 115th St S 116th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 671 112 2,349 36 64 60 Marginal 44 1882 East Marginal Way S S 96th PI S Norfolk St Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 1,742 426 8,944 41 67 60 Marginal 48 1687 East Marginal Way S S 116th St Interurban Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 392 65 1,370 39 70 60 Marginal 48 1868 East Marginal Way S S 128th St S 128th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 170 28 596 42 66 60 Marginal 48 1427 East Marginal Way S S 112th St S 115th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 713 119 2,494 40 71 60 Fair 49 1864 East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 19 747 79 1,656 47 71 60 Fair 54 1866 East Marginal Way S S 128th St S 130th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 519 86 1,816 50 66 60 Fair 54 1423 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Boeing Access Rd Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 52 13 268 55 57 60 Fair 55 1528 East Marginal Way S S Norfolk St S 102nd St Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 386 94 1,980 50 75 60 Fair 57 1877 East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Tukwila Intl Blvd Principal Arterial Asphalt 43 242 58 1,212 49 77 30 Fair 57 1162 East Marginal Way S CITY LIMIT S 81st PI Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 723 177 3,711 53 72 60 Fair 58 1158 East Marginal Way S S 130th St 40th Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 113 19 396 53 72 60 Fair 58 1874 East Marginal Way S S 102nd St S 104th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 587 144 3,014 51 78 60 Good 59 1008 East Marginal Way S Boeing Access Rd Tukwila Intl Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 197 33 690 60 65 60 Good 61 2086 East Marginal Way S SR 599 S 120th PI Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 603 100 2,109 58 73 60 Good 62 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 83 page 7 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1165 East Marginal Way S S 104th St DS@507S S 104th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 507 124 2,600 58 76 60 Good 63 1160 East Marginal Way S S 126th St S 128th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 353 59 1,235 64 69 60 Good 65 1881 East Marginal Way S DS@507S S 104th St Boeing Access Rd Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 314 77 1,609 62 74 60 Good 65 1426 East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S S 133rd St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 893 149 3,127 62 76 60 Good 66 1428 East Marginal Way S S 81st PI S 87th PI Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 2,601 636 13,350 65 73 60 Good 67 1157 East Marginal Way S S 90th St S 94th PI Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 1,667 408 8,560 68 72 60 Good 68 1883 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Boeing Access Rd Local Asphalt 30 309 52 1,082 74 60 60 Good 69 1875 East Marginal Way S S 124th St S 126th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 899 150 3,147 68 76 60 V Good 70 1997 East Marginal Way S S 87th PI S 90th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 524 128 2,688 72 74 60 V Good 72 1391 East Marginal Way S S 120th PI S 124th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 1,254 209 4,390 75 68 60 V Good 72 1009 East Marginal Way S Tukwila Intl Blvd Tukwila Intl Blvd Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 82 20 421 87 46 80 V Good 73 1531 East Marginal Way S S 94th PI S 96th PI Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 718 176 3,688 79 70 60 V Good 75 1508 Evans Black Dr WEST END Andover Park E Local Asphalt 30 567 94 1,984 93 66 60 V Good 84 1954 Fort Dent Way Interurban Ave S Starfire Way Local Asphalt 29 688 111 2,329 92 72 60 Excellent 85 1341 Frager Rd S 204th St S 204th St Collector Asphalt 32 3 1 11 77 0 80 Fair 50 1364 Fun Center Way DS@447E Interurban Ave S SW Grady Way Local Asphalt 20 112 12 261 45 11 60 Poor 33 1510 Fun Center Way Interurban Ave S DS@447E Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 22 447 55 1,148 86 69 60 V Good 80 1696 Gateway Dr Interurban Ave S S 133rd St Local Asphalt 21 2,527 295 6,192 91 70 60 V Good 84 1002 Industry Dr Andover Park E DS@355E Andover Park E Local Asphalt 22 355 43 911 70 69 60 Good 69 1998 Interurban Ave S Macadam Rd S Gateway Dr Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 997 166 3,488 32 64 60 Marginal 41 1872 Interurban Ave S SW Grady Way West Valley Hwy Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 141 43 906 37 61 60 Marginal 43 1167 Interurban Ave S 58th Ave S S 143rd St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 615 191 4,015 46 57 60 Marginal 48 1562 Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way SW Grady Way Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 231 70 1,480 48 53 60 Marginal 48 1159 Interurban Ave S 40th Ave S Macadam Rd S Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 2,868 478 10,037 37 83 60 Fair 51 1559 Interurban Ave S 48th Ave S 1-5 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 127 39 817 53 56 60 Fair 53 1880 Interurban Ave S S 140th St 58th Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 829 253 5,322 52 62 60 Fair 54 1876 Interurban Ave S West Valley Hwy SW Grady Way Local Asphalt 22 164 20 421 59 55 60 Fair 57 1878 Interurban Ave S 1-5 Ramp 56th Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 607 186 3,897 59 65 60 Good 60 1871 Interurban Ave S 56th Ave S S 140th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 2,142 655 13,745 58 69 60 Good 60 1392 Interurban Ave S 1-405 Ramp DS@490E 1-405 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 490 152 3,198 60 67 60 Good 61 1994 Interurban Ave S East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 1,013 169 3,544 58 77 60 Good 63 1999 Interurban Ave S S 149th St 1-405 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,953 608 12,761 65 65 60 Good 64 1873 Interurban Ave S 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 573 175 3,675 66 64 60 Good 64 1879 Interurban Ave S S 133rd St SR 599 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 276 46 966 73 65 60 V Good 70 1867 Interurban Ave S DS@490E 1-405 Ramp Fun Center Way Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 125 39 815 77 60 60 V Good 70 1161 Interurban Ave S SR 599 Ramp 48th Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 767 128 2,683 71 72 60 V Good 71 1011 Interurban Ave S S 143rd St S 143rd PI Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 339 106 2,218 72 70 60 V Good 71 1996 Interurban Ave S Interurban Ave S Southcenter Blvd Local Asphalt 22 387 47 992 82 57 80 V Good 73 1865 Interurban Ave S S 147th St S 149th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 604 188 3,946 79 65 60 V Good 74 1164 Interurban Ave S SR 599 Ramp S 133rd St Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 284 47 993 76 75 60 V Good 75 1218 Interurban Ave S Gateway Dr SR 599 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 500 83 1,749 73 83 60 V Good 76 1870 Interurban Ave S S 144th St S 147th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 916 285 5,983 86 77 60 V Good 82 1424 Interurban Ave S S 143rd PI S 144th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 344 107 2,248 95 87 60 Excellent 91 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 84 page 8 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1839 Interurban PI S 40th Ave S SE END Local Asphalt 22 478 58 1,226 62 43 60 Fair 55 1398 Klickitat Dr 1-5 Ramp Southcenter Pkwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 1,052 175 3,682 51 71 60 Fair 56 1248 Klickitat Dr 53rd Ave S 1-5 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 1,089 181 3,811 72 87 60 V Good 76 1397 Klickitat Dr 51st Ave S 53rd Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 30 877 146 3,068 79 73 60 V Good 77 1375 Longacres Way West Valley Hwy Nelsen PI Local Asphalt 22 400 49 1,028 70 72 60 V Good 70 1944 Macadam Rd S S 136th St S 137th St Collector Asphalt 34 308 58 1,222 38 53 60 Marginal 41 1948 Macadam Rd S Interurban Ave S SR 599 Collector Asphalt 35 123 24 502 36 66 60 Marginal 44 1317 Macadam Rd S 43rd Ave S S 136th St Collector Asphalt 35 1,710 333 6,984 41 58 60 Marginal 45 1945 Macadam Rd S S 138th St S 144th St Collector Asphalt 34 1,997 377 7,922 46 64 60 Fair 51 1315 Macadam Rd S S 137th St S 138th St Collector Asphalt 34 783 148 3,105 49 58 60 Fair 51 1947 Macadam Rd S SR 599 S 128th St Collector Asphalt 35 192 37 784 80 53 80 V Good 71 1316 Macadam Rd S SR 599 SR 599 Collector Asphalt 35 104 20 426 80 73 60 V Good 77 1495 Macadam Rd S S 130th St S 131st PI Collector Asphalt 35 531 103 2,170 86 65 60 V Good 78 1946 Macadam Rd S S 133rd St 43rd Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 338 66 1,379 86 65 60 V Good 79 1314 Macadam Rd S S 131st PI S 133rd St Collector Asphalt 35 534 104 2,180 89 65 60 V Good 80 1312 Macadam Rd S S 128th St S 130th St Collector Asphalt 35 271 53 1,107 89 68 60 V Good 82 1098 Macadam Rd S S 144th St S 149th Ln Collector Asphalt 34 1,662 314 6,592 90 77 60 Excellent 85 2064 Macadam Rd S S 149th Ln S 150th St Collector Asphalt 34 195 37 773 99 67 60 Excellent 87 1943 Macadam Rd S S 150th St S 152nd St Collector Asphalt 34 867 164 3,439 97 77 60 Excellent 89 1313 Macadam Rd S S 152nd St Southcenter Blvd Collector Asphalt 34 1,451 274 5,754 99 85 60 Excellent 93 1319 Martin L King Jr Way S 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,943 604 12,692 57 80 60 Good 63 1812 Martin L King Jr Way S Boeing Access Rd 1-5 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 163 51 1,062 71 59 60 Good 66 1813 Martin L King Jr Way S 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 586 182 3,831 70 82 80 V Good 74 1148 Martin L King Jr Way S 1-5 Ramp CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,935 602 12,643 73 89 60 V Good 77 1811 Martin L King Jr Way S DS@413S S 104th PI Boeing Access Rd Principal Arterial Concrete 55 158 48 1,017 93 56 60 V Good 81 1318 Martin L King Jr Way S CITY LIMIT S 104th PI Principal Arterial Concrete 56 114 35 744 97 65 60 Excellent 86 1332 Martin L King Jr Way S S 104th PI DS@413S S 104th PI Principal Arterial Concrete 56 413 129 2,701 100 71 60 Excellent 90 1323 Martin L King Jr Way S CITY LIMIT Martin L King Jr Way S Local Concrete 25 526 73 1,535 100 80 60 Excellent 93 1593 Midland Dr WEST END Andover Park W Local Asphalt 22 900 110 2,311 8 69 60 Poor 28 1614 Military Rd S S 158th St EAST END Local Asphalt 25 187 26 546 73 52 80 Good 66 1355 Minkler Blvd Southcenter Pkwy Bauch Dr Collector Asphalt 35 1,314 255 5,365 68 63 60 Good 65 1365 Minkler Blvd Andover Park W Andover Park E Collector Asphalt 33 903 165 3,475 75 69 60 V Good 73 2019 Minkler Blvd Bauch Dr Andover Park W Collector Asphalt 35 672 131 2,743 80 66 60 V Good 75 1357 Minkler Blvd Andover Park E Industry Dr Local Asphalt 22 585 72 1,503 87 57 60 V Good 77 1378 Nelsen PI S 156th St Longacres Way Local Asphalt 24 571 76 1,599 31 45 60 Poor 35 1633 Olympic Ave S Todd Blvd S Glacier St Local Asphalt 22 853 104 2,190 64 83 60 Good 69 1834 Olympic Ave S Riverside Dr Todd Blvd Local Asphalt 25 865 120 2,524 75 80 60 V Good 76 1371 Orillia Rd S S 188th St S 200th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 3,525 1,097 23,031 31 84 60 Marginal 47 1645 Orillia Rd S S 200th St S 204th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,602 498 10,465 69 87 60 V Good 74 1823 Pamela Dr 57th Ave S NE END Local Asphalt 19 405 43 898 73 61 60 Good 68 1664 Pamela Dr Pamela Dr Pamela Dr Local Asphalt 19 178 19 395 89 52 60 V Good 76 1213 Riverside Dr Olympic Ave S Cascade Ave S Local Asphalt 19 480 51 1,064 74 90 60 V Good 79 2161 S 102nd St 27th Ave S DS@644E 27th Ave S Local Asphalt 19 644 68 1,427 88 74 60 V Good 83 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 85 page 9 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn 0 •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1457 S 104th PI WEST END Martin L King Jr Way S Local Asphalt 19 751 79 1,665 54 57 60 Fair 54 1014 S 1041h PI DS@258E 47th Ave S S 104th PI Local Asphalt 20 61 7 142 86 2 80 Fair 57 1015 S 104th PI DS@188E 47th Ave S DS@258E 47th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 69 8 162 80 14 80 Fair 57 1013 S 104th PI 47th Ave S DS@188E 47th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 188 21 440 85 63 60 V Good 77 1425 S 104th St 27th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local Asphalt 20 977 109 2,279 64 61 60 Good 62 1118 S 107th St S Ryan Way EAST END Local Asphalt 20 302 34 705 30 38 60 Poor 31 1119 S 107th St Beacon Ave S 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 22 130 16 333 89 37 80 V Good 71 1278 S 107th St 49th Ave S Beacon Ave S Local Asphalt 22 471 58 1,210 95 63 60 V Good 84 1799 S 109th St Beacon Ave S Beacon Ave S Local Asphalt 24 1 0 3 62 22 80 Marginal 48 1940 S 109th St 50th Ave S Beacon Ave S Local Asphalt 22 217 26 556 51 52 60 Fair 50 2128 S 109th St Beacon Ave S 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 24 30 4 82 75 18 80 Fair 56 1800 S 109th St 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 283 35 727 70 60 60 Good 66 1284 S 112th St 50th Ave S 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 20 294 33 686 52 43 60 Marginal 48 1286 S 112th St Tukwila Intl Blvd East Marginal Way S Collector Asphalt 35 995 193 4,063 62 75 60 Good 66 1285 S 112th St WEST END Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 22 778 95 1,997 64 72 60 Good 66 1039 S 113th St WEST END 41st Ave S Local Asphalt 20 475 53 1,109 48 31 60 Marginal 41 1988 S 113th St WEST END 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 20 345 38 805 61 44 60 Fair 54 1444 S 114th St 40th Ave S 41st Ave S Local Asphalt 22 219 27 562 39 27 80 Poor 35 1443 S 114th St WEST END 40th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 211 23 493 78 9 80 Fair 55 1442 S 114th St 41st Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 22 148 18 380 83 0 80 Fair 55 1441 S 114th St 49th Ave S 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 22 918 112 2,356 80 58 60 V Good 72 1057 S 115th St East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S Collector Asphalt 33 1,096 201 4,219 51 73 60 Fair 57 1059 S 115th St 42nd Ave S NE END Local Asphalt 19 209 22 462 89 32 80 Good 69 1058 S 115th St 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Collector Asphalt 32 764 136 2,852 71 71 60 V Good 70 1338 S 116th St WEST END East Marginal Way S Local Asphalt 19 1,114 118 2,469 62 56 60 Fair 59 2100 S 116th St East Marginal Way S 35th Ln S Local Asphalt 19 226 24 501 73 44 80 Good 63 1628 S 116th St 43rd PI S 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 19 363 38 806 74 54 60 Good 67 2102 S 116th St 35th Ln S 39th Ave S Local Asphalt 19 488 52 1,082 90 72 60 V Good 83 1596 S 117th St 39th Ave S 40th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 315 35 736 87 77 60 V Good 83 1690 S 118th St 44th PI S EAST END Local Asphalt 20 201 22 469 17 28 60 V Poor 20 2098 S 118th St 44th Ave S 44th PI S Local Asphalt 20 94 10 220 84 91 60 Excellent 86 1360 S 119th St 40th Ave S 40th PI S Local Concrete 20 240 27 560 100 47 60 V Good 83 1370 S 119th St 40th PI S EAST END Local Concrete 21 224 26 549 100 55 60 Excellent 85 1987 S 120th PI WEST END East Marginal Way S Local Concrete 21 1,244 145 3,048 95 59 60 V Good 83 1229 S 122nd Ln 50th Ave S 51st PIS Local Asphalt 21 338 39 828 78 54 60 V Good 69 1430 S 122nd St 44th Ave S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 98 12 251 63 57 60 Good 60 1432 S 122nd St 43rd Ave S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 21 152 18 373 69 62 60 Good 66 1440 S 122nd St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Local Asphalt 21 334 39 819 76 54 80 Good 68 1671 S 122nd St 46th Ave S 46th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 54 7 138 75 55 80 Good 68 1061 S 122nd St 45th Ave S 46th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 190 23 488 80 72 60 V Good 77 1436 S 122nd St 48th Ave S 44th PI S Local Asphalt 19 187 20 415 86 60 60 V Good 77 1433 S 122nd St 44th PI S 49th Ave S Local Asphalt 19 63 7 139 94 49 60 V Good 79 1431 S 122nd St 46th Ave S 47th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 248 30 638 88 72 60 V Good 82 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 86 page 10 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1434 S 122nd St 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Local Asphalt 19 255 27 565 88 74 60 V Good 83 1106 S 122nd St 49th Ave S 51st PI S Local Asphalt 19 130 14 287 95 65 60 Excellent 84 1435 S 122nd St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 252 31 646 93 70 60 Excellent 85 1336 S 124th St 50th PI S 51st PI S Local Asphalt 20 409 45 954 66 60 60 Good 63 1417 S 124th St 35th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local Asphalt 19 718 76 1,591 73 54 80 Good 66 1553 S 124th St 49th Ave S 50th PI S Collector Asphalt 34 253 48 1,002 74 64 30 V Good 70 1502 S 124th St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 273 53 1,115 83 75 60 V Good 80 1990 S 124th St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 257 50 1,050 84 74 60 V Good 80 1993 S 124th St 45th Ave S 46th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 243 47 994 92 70 60 V Good 84 1816 S 124th St 48th Ave S 49th Ave S Collector Asphalt 34 253 48 1,005 89 77 60 V Good 84 1505 S 124th St 43rd Ave S 44th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 244 47 995 91 77 60 Excellent 86 1414 S 124th St 46th Ave S 47th Ave S Collector Asphalt 34 249 47 987 91 79 60 Excellent 86 1991 S 124th St 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Collector Asphalt 34 254 48 1,008 90 81 60 Excellent 86 1310 S 125th St 46th Ave S 50th PI S Local Asphalt 20 1,156 128 2,697 88 79 60 V Good 84 1366 S 126th St 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 20 317 35 741 66 37 80 Fair 56 1512 S 126th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 419 47 977 94 58 60 V Good 81 1643 S 126th St 37th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local Asphalt 20 549 61 1,282 93 66 60 V Good 83 1373 S 126th St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 405 45 944 94 70 60 Excellent 86 1241 S 128th St East Marginal Way S 40th Ave S Local Asphalt 19 87 9 192 70 44 80 Good 60 1906 S 128th St WEST END 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 218 27 560 84 18 80 Good 61 1455 S 128th St 40th Ave S Macadam Rd S Local Asphalt 19 854 90 1,892 73 58 60 Good 67 1904 S 128th St CITY LIMIT CITY LIMIT Local Asphalt 24 1 0 3 100 28 60 V Good 76 1903 S 128th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 409 50 1,049 96 48 60 V Good 79 1905 S 128th St Military Rd S CITY LIMIT Local Asphalt 22 653 80 1,675 92 69 60 V Good 84 1242 S 128th St 37th Ave S East Marginal Way S Local Asphalt 22 786 96 2,017 98 59 60 Excellent 85 1103 S 129th St S 130th PI CITY LIMIT Collector Concrete 32 1,139 203 4,253 100 64 60 Excellent 88 1595 S 130th PI 57th Ave S SE END Local Asphalt 22 1,478 181 3,795 50 50 60 Fair 50 1549 S 130th PI 50th PI S 56th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 1,828 223 4,691 64 64 60 Good 64 1280 S 130th PI 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 270 33 694 73 61 80 Good 69 1141 S 130th St 33rd PI S 34th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 99 12 254 62 4 80 Marginal 42 2095 S 130th St 38th Ln S East Marginal Way S Local Asphalt 25 282 39 823 61 59 60 Good 60 1635 S 130th St 35th Ave S 35th Ln S Local Asphalt 25 284 39 828 73 51 60 Good 65 1853 S 130th St 37th Ave S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 24 21 3 57 83 30 80 Good 65 1140 S 130th St 41st Ave S Macadam Rd S Local Asphalt 25 493 68 1,438 80 52 80 V Good 70 1837 S 130th St 33rd Ave S 33rd PI S Local Asphalt 22 55 7 141 87 49 60 V Good 74 1857 S 130th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 215 26 551 82 58 80 V Good 74 1170 S 130th St 32nd Ave S 33rd Ave S Local Asphalt 22 335 41 860 95 39 60 V Good 76 1381 S 130th St East Marginal Way S 41st Ave S Local Asphalt 25 285 40 831 85 66 60 V Good 78 1387 S 130th St 35th Ln S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 121 17 352 89 60 60 V Good 79 1155 S 130th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 237 33 691 90 74 60 V Good 84 2093 S 130th St 38th Ave S 38th Ln S Local Asphalt 25 261 36 762 99 76 60 Excellent 91 1185 S 131 st PI 44th Ave S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 133 15 311 55 40 60 Fair 49 1186 S 131 st PI Macadam Rd S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 20 336 37 784 88 57 60 V Good 77 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 87 page 11 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name GISID On Street From Street To Street E FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1893 S 131 st PI 41 st Ave S Macadam Rd S Local Asphalt 20 527 59 1,229 86 61 60 V Good 77 1007 S 132nd PI S 132nd PI S 132nd PI Local Asphalt 19 214 23 475 29 5 80 V Poor 20 1917 S 132nd PI NW END 38th PI S Local Asphalt 19 180 19 400 69 43 60 Good 60 2097 S 132nd PI 38th PI S 40th Ave S Local Asphalt 19 285 30 632 86 58 60 V Good 76 1618 S 132nd St 35th Ln S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 132 16 340 25 10 80 V Poor 19 2005 S 132nd St 34th Ave S 34th Ln S Collector Asphalt 34 248 47 983 18 66 60 Poor 33 1615 S 132nd St 35th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Collector Asphalt 35 98 19 402 47 16 80 Poor 36 1616 S 132nd St 33rd Ave S 34th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 332 65 1,355 33 71 30 Marginal 45 2006 S 132nd St 34th Ln S 35th Ave S Collector Asphalt 33 96 18 368 42 73 60 Fair 51 1172 S 133rd St 31 st Ave S 32nd Ave S Collector Asphalt 25 303 42 883 23 76 60 Marginal 39 1520 S 133rd St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 22 309 38 793 36 49 60 Marginal 39 1529 S 133rd St Military Rd S 30th PI S Collector Asphalt 25 449 62 1,311 29 68 60 Marginal 41 1642 S 133rd St 35th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 22 262 32 672 41 46 60 Marginal 41 1153 S 133rd St 30th PI S 31st Ave S Collector Asphalt 25 208 29 608 24 82 60 Marginal 42 1154 S 133rd St 32nd Ave S S 132nd St Collector Asphalt 25 388 54 1,131 56 64 60 Fair 58 1926 S 133rd St SR 599 Interurban Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 35 210 41 856 69 53 60 Good 63 1858 S 133rd St 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 259 39 817 89 36 60 V Good 71 1919 S 133rd St S 134th PI SR 599 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 35 388 75 1,583 75 90 60 V Good 80 1862 S 133rd St 44th Ave S S 134th PI Minor Arterial Asphalt 34 481 91 1,909 90 63 60 V Good 81 1851 S 133rd St East Marginal Way S Macadam Rd S Minor Arterial Asphalt 34 488 92 1,936 86 76 60 V Good 82 2001 S 133rd St 57th Ave S 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 24 12 2 33 100 49 60 V Good 83 1555 S 133rd St Macadam Rd S 44th Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 34 334 63 1,326 93 75 60 Excellent 87 1923 S 133rd St SR 599 SR 599 Minor Arterial Asphalt 35 60 12 244 82 100 60 Excellent 87 1921 S 133rd St SR 599 Ramp SR 599 Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 22 6 117 89 96 60 Excellent 90 1829 S 134th PI S 133rd St 47th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 977 141 2,964 72 54 60 Good 65 1638 S 1341h PI 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 215 31 653 83 67 60 V Good 78 1703 S 135th St Military Rd S 32nd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 835 121 2,532 65 64 60 Good 63 1701 S 135th St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 320 48 1,006 85 70 60 V Good 79 1702 S 1351h St 32nd Ave S 34th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 637 96 2,007 90 68 60 V Good 82 1214 S 135th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 309 46 973 92 68 60 V Good 84 2084 S 136th St WEST END 52nd PI S Local Asphalt 28 80 12 262 54 19 80 Marginal 41 2083 S 136th St 52nd PI S 52nd Ave S Local Asphalt 28 284 44 927 43 45 60 Marginal 43 1900 S 136th St Macadam Rd S 48th PI S Local Asphalt 28 302 47 986 64 45 60 Fair 57 1675 S 136th St 48th PI S EAST END Local Asphalt 28 250 39 817 76 52 60 Good 67 1676 S 136th St WEST END 45th PI S Local Asphalt 28 410 64 1,340 84 53 80 V Good 73 1899 S 136th St 32nd Ave S 34th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 670 100 2,110 96 63 60 V Good 84 1896 S 137th PI S 137th PI S 137th PI Local Asphalt 26 188 27 571 92 38 80 V Good 74 1898 S 137th PI 43rd PI S NORTH END Local Asphalt 28 136 21 445 88 50 60 V Good 75 1637 S 137th St 53rd Ave S 56th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 224 34 705 71 42 60 Good 61 1849 S 137th St 45th PI S Macadam Rd S Local Asphalt 25 163 23 475 66 73 30 Good 67 1139 S 137th St 40th Ave S 43rd PI S Local Asphalt 26 150 22 455 88 41 80 V Good 72 1636 S 137th St 53rd Ave S 53rd Ave S Local Asphalt 27 152 23 480 89 39 80 V Good 72 1847 S 137th St 52nd PI S 53rd Ave S Local Asphalt 27 127 19 400 97 33 60 V Good 76 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 88 page 12 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1171 S 137th St 43rd PI S 43rd PI S Local Asphalt 25 285 40 833 82 69 60 V Good 77 1850 S 1371h St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 387 54 1,129 95 53 60 V Good 81 1835 S 137th St 43rd PI S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 420 58 1,225 90 64 60 V Good 81 1830 S 137th St 34th Ave S 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 206 30 626 96 61 60 V Good 84 1173 S 137th St 45th Ave S 45th PI S Local Asphalt 25 248 34 724 99 58 60 Excellent 85 1145 S 137th St 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 300 43 910 96 69 60 Excellent 87 1634 S 137th St 32nd Ave S 34th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 767 111 2,327 95 78 60 Excellent 89 1854 S 137th St 52nd Ave S 52nd PI S Local Asphalt 27 208 31 654 100 75 60 Excellent 91 1959 S 138th St Macadam Rd S NE END Local Asphalt 27 268 40 846 24 34 60 Poor 26 2085 S 138th St 51st Ave S 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 27 114 17 359 98 61 60 Excellent 85 1958 S 138th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 340 51 1,070 93 77 60 Excellent 87 1127 S 139th St 53rd Ave S 55th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 374 54 1,134 32 49 60 Poor 37 1122 S 139th St 56th Ave S 56th PI S Local Asphalt 26 183 26 556 38 46 60 Marginal 40 1125 S 139th St 42nd Ave S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 24 620 83 1,737 55 54 60 Fair 54 1123 S 139th St 45th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 24 295 39 827 65 48 60 Fair 58 1126 S 139th St WEST END 45th Ave S Local Asphalt 24 113 15 316 93 40 60 V Good 75 1121 S 139th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 41st Ave S Local Asphalt 24 382 51 1,068 84 67 60 V Good 78 1128 S 139th St 51st Ave S 53rd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 546 79 1,657 98 41 60 V Good 78 1124 S 139th St 41st Ave S 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 24 348 46 975 90 66 60 V Good 82 1605 S 140th St 44th Ave S 45th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 364 53 1,105 59 50 60 Fair 55 1486 S 140th St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 326 47 990 59 68 60 Good 61 1482 S 140th St Interurban Ave S NE END Local Asphalt 24 207 28 581 80 39 80 Good 66 1599 S 140th St 43rd Ave S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 329 48 999 74 60 60 Good 69 1603 S 140th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 646 93 1,959 75 60 60 Good 69 1484 S 140th St 38th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 27 336 50 1,057 71 69 60 V Good 70 1600 S 140th St Military Rd S 33rd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 358 52 1,086 75 62 60 V Good 70 1483 S 140th St 35th Ave S 34th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 59 9 185 94 37 60 V Good 74 1598 S 140th St 53rd Ave S 55th Ave S Local Asphalt 24 540 72 1,512 87 60 60 V Good 78 1485 S 140th St 33rd PI S 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 537 81 1,693 84 71 30 V Good 79 1604 S 140th St 37th Ave S 38th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 307 46 966 97 53 60 V Good 82 1602 S 140th St 33rd Ave S 33rd PI S Local Asphalt 26 426 61 1,291 94 75 60 Excellent 87 1601 S 140th St 34th Ave S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 369 55 1,163 100 77 60 Excellent 91 1591 S 141st St 56th Ave S 56th PI S Local Asphalt 24 239 32 670 24 22 60 V Poor 23 1587 S 141st St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 24 589 79 1,649 40 52 60 Marginal 43 1590 S 141st St 56th PI S 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 167 23 486 60 48 60 Fair 55 1589 S 141st St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 24 690 92 1,933 82 69 60 V Good 77 1588 S 141st St 33rd PI S 34th PI S Local Asphalt 24 178 24 498 99 61 60 Excellent 86 1279 S 142nd PI 35th Ave S 37th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 436 60 1,270 81 71 30 V Good 77 1089 S 142nd PI Military Rd S EAST END Local Asphalt 25 208 29 607 91 74 60 Excellent 85 1090 S 142nd PI S 142nd PI S 142nd PI Local Asphalt 25 146 20 427 98 100 60 Excellent 98 1737 S 142nd St 57th Ave S 59th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 426 62 1,292 38 46 60 Marginal 40 1744 S 142nd St 52nd Ave S 53rd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 272 39 825 49 46 60 Marginal 47 1743 S 142nd St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 318 46 965 50 55 60 Fair 51 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 89 page 13 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1739 S 142nd St WEST END 52nd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 85 12 258 82 53 60 V Good 72 1742 S 142nd St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 25 700 97 2,040 95 87 60 Excellent 92 1353 S 143rd PI Interurban Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 26 839 121 2,545 75 54 60 Good 67 1138 S 143rd St Interurban Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 26 1,107 160 3,357 11 57 60 Poor 25 1188 S 144th St 59th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 27 218 33 687 45 18 80 Poor 36 1194 S 144th St 46th Ave S 48th Ave S Collector Asphalt 29 653 105 2,210 30 70 30 Marginal 42 2073 S 144th St 44th Ln S 46th Ave S Collector Asphalt 29 545 88 1,843 31 69 30 Marginal 42 1190 S 144th St 48th Ave S Macadam Rd S Collector Asphalt 29 654 105 2,213 38 70 60 Marginal 47 1193 S 144th St 57th Ave S 58th Ave S Collector Asphalt 31 427 74 1,544 57 44 60 Fair 52 1243 S 144th St 58th Ave S 59th Ave S Local Asphalt 27 420 63 1,322 59 52 60 Fair 56 2074 S 144th St 42nd Ave S 44th Ln S Collector Asphalt 29 777 125 2,630 52 70 60 Fair 57 1187 S 144th St 37th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Collector Asphalt 30 540 90 1,891 59 63 60 Good 59 1677 S 144th St Military Rd S 34th Ave S Collector Asphalt 30 319 53 1,117 51 80 60 Good 60 1192 S 144th St 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Collector Concrete 31 425 73 1,538 69 46 60 Good 61 1244 S 144th St 54th PI S 55th Ave S Collector Asphalt 31 129 22 466 63 61 80 Good 62 1678 S 144th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 41st Ave S Collector Asphalt 30 392 65 1,372 73 43 60 Good 62 2015 S 144th St 34th Ln S 37th Ave S Collector Asphalt 30 495 82 1,732 61 71 60 Good 64 1245 S 144th St Macadam Rd S 54th PI S Collector Asphalt 31 343 59 1,241 68 61 60 Good 65 1679 S 144th St 55th Ave S 56th Ave S Collector Asphalt 31 421 73 1,523 66 75 60 Good 68 1246 S 144th St Interurban Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 27 651 98 2,049 81 56 60 V Good 72 2016 S 144th St 34th Ave S 34th Ln S Collector Asphalt 30 289 48 1,012 78 74 60 V Good 76 2079 S 144th St Macadam Rd S 1-5 Fwy Collector Concrete 29 187 30 631 100 51 60 V Good 84 1189 S 144th St 53rd Ave S Macadam Rd S Collector Asphalt 31 106 18 385 94 65 60 V Good 84 1191 S 144th St 41st Ave S 42nd Ave S Collector Asphalt 30 390 65 1,365 92 71 60 V Good 84 2076 S 144th St 1-5 Fwy 53rd Ave S Collector Asphalt 29 254 41 860 100 68 60 Excellent 89 1361 S 145th St DS@63E S 145th St S 145th St Local Asphalt 27 95 14 300 90 11 80 Good 63 1367 S 1451h St S 145th St DS@63E S 145th St Local Asphalt 27 63 9 198 98 9 80 Good 68 1509 S 145th St 48th PI S EAST END Local Asphalt 27 231 35 727 97 48 60 V Good 80 1942 S 1461h St Tukwila Intl Blvd 41st Ave S Local Asphalt 25 659 92 1,922 39 48 60 Marginal 41 1803 S 146th St 46th Ave S 48th PI S Local Asphalt 25 793 110 2,312 37 54 60 Marginal 42 1802 S 146th St 48th PI S EAST END Local Asphalt 26 316 46 958 51 49 60 Fair 49 1801 S 146th St 41st Ave S 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 25 347 48 1,013 48 65 60 Fair 53 1804 S 146th St 35th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 25 681 95 1,986 63 76 60 Good 66 1805 S 146th St Military Rd S 35th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 435 60 1,267 73 66 60 V Good 70 1806 S 146th St 42nd Ave S 46th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 1,318 183 3,845 82 78 60 V Good 80 1757 S 1471h St Interurban Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 32 120 21 449 78 10 80 Fair 55 1759 S 147th St 59th Ave S 59th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 131 25 535 68 48 60 Good 61 1251 S 147th St 57th Ave S 58th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 427 62 1,296 91 55 60 V Good 79 1756 S 147th St 59th Aly S 59th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 99 19 404 94 68 60 Excellent 85 1252 S 147th St 58th Ave S 59th Aly S Collector Asphalt 35 205 40 838 93 70 60 Excellent 85 1758 S 147th St 56th Ave S 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 377 54 1,143 97 65 60 Excellent 86 1272 S 148th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 32 1,233 219 4,604 54 54 60 Fair 53 2071 S 1481h St 46th Ave S 46th Ln S Local Asphalt 32 255 45 951 69 60 60 Good 65 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 90 page 14 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1578 S 1481h St Military Rd S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 32 817 145 3,051 83 70 60 V Good 78 1273 S 1481h St 42nd Ave S 46th Ave S Local Asphalt 32 1,314 234 4,907 85 73 60 V Good 80 2070 S 148th St 46th Ln S 46th Ln S Local Asphalt 32 153 27 572 92 61 60 V Good 81 1345 S 149th St DS@480E NW END Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 32 537 95 2,005 37 28 60 Poor 34 1335 S 149th St WEST END 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 32 656 117 2,447 78 38 60 Good 64 1506 S 149th St 59th Ave S 62nd Ave S Local Asphalt 32 674 120 2,518 86 64 60 V Good 78 1501 S 150th PI WEST END 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 32 767 136 2,864 88 63 60 V Good 79 1350 S 150th St 42nd Ave S 43rd PI S Local Asphalt 32 527 94 1,966 70 52 60 Good 63 1354 S 150th St Macadam Rd S EAST END Local Asphalt 32 767 136 2,865 79 48 60 Good 68 1369 S 150th St Tukwila Intl Blvd 38th Ave S Local Asphalt 32 530 94 1,977 85 55 60 V Good 74 1349 S 150th St 43rd PI S 46th Ave S Local Asphalt 32 788 140 2,941 84 64 60 V Good 77 1376 S 150th St 41st PI S 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 32 242 43 903 84 64 60 V Good 77 1358 S 150th St 46th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 32 898 160 3,353 87 60 60 V Good 77 1359 S 150th St Military Rd S Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 32 523 93 1,951 93 64 60 V Good 83 1374 S 150th St 38th Ave S 41st PI S Local Asphalt 32 688 122 2,570 97 75 60 Excellent 89 1662 S 151st PI EAST END EAST END Local Asphalt 32 183 32 682 48 29 80 Marginal 41 1607 S 151st PI WEST END 63rd PI S Local Asphalt 32 98 17 365 47 41 60 Marginal 44 1546 S 151st PI 63rd PI S EAST END Local Asphalt 32 161 29 600 69 65 60 Good 67 1606 S 151st PI EAST END EAST END Local Asphalt 32 182 32 680 69 83 60 V Good 73 1299 S 151st St DS@90E S 151st St S 151st St Local Asphalt 32 44 8 164 74 9 80 Fair 52 1544 S 151st St S 151st St DS@90E S 151st St Local Asphalt 32 90 16 334 80 32 80 Good 63 1542 S 151st St 51st Ave S 52nd Ave S Local Asphalt 32 375 67 1,401 71 50 60 Good 63 1543 S 151st St WEST END 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 32 220 39 822 85 52 60 V Good 74 1298 S 151st St 62nd Ave S 63rd PI S Collector Asphalt 35 310 60 1,266 75 76 60 V Good 75 1300 S 151st St 63rd PI S 65th Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 332 65 1,357 75 77 60 V Good 75 1995 S 152nd PI 57th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 26 458 66 1,391 60 47 60 Fair 55 1718 S 152nd St International Blvd 37th PI S Local Asphalt 26 717 104 2,176 26 50 60 Poor 33 1720 S 152nd St WEST END 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 25 271 38 791 59 59 80 Fair 58 1108 S 152nd St 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 25 315 44 919 79 50 80 Good 69 1716 S 152nd St 57th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 26 537 78 1,628 93 34 80 V Good 73 1717 S 152nd St Macadam Rd S 57th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 895 129 2,714 92 60 60 V Good 81 1719 S 152nd St 37th PI S 40th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 656 95 1,989 96 63 60 Excellent 85 1661 S 153rd St 65th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 27 659 99 2,075 72 43 60 Good 62 1585 S 153rd St 64th Ave S 65th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 410 59 1,245 66 61 60 Good 63 1584 S 153rd St 62nd Ave S 64th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 590 85 1,789 76 50 60 Good 67 2023 S 156th St 44th Ave S 44th PI S Local Asphalt 27 407 61 1,283 72 63 60 Good 69 1197 S 156th St I-405 Ramp Nelsen PI Local Asphalt 26 431 62 1,306 85 77 60 V Good 82 2022 S 156th St 44th PI S 47th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 415 58 1,210 98 76 60 Excellent 90 1525 S 158th St 42nd Ave S 44th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 740 103 2,160 80 60 60 V Good 73 1526 S 158th St Military Rd S 38th PI S Local Asphalt 27 870 131 2,741 85 62 60 V Good 77 1556 S 158th St 40th Ln S 42nd Ave S Local Asphalt 26 350 51 1,062 90 62 60 V Good 81 1650 S 158th St 38th PI S 39th PI S Local Asphalt 25 100 14 290 94 62 60 V Good 83 1852 S 158th St S 160th St Military Rd S Local Asphalt 27 135 20 425 79 94 60 V Good 84 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 91 page 15 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1527 S 1581h St 44th Ave S 47th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 856 119 2,497 93 71 60 Excellent 85 1649 S 1581h St 38th PI S 38th PI S Local Asphalt 28 38 6 125 95 81 60 Excellent 90 1646 S 158th St 40th PI S 40th Ln S Local Asphalt 27 184 28 581 100 72 60 Excellent 90 1522 S 158th St 39th PI S 40th PI S Local Asphalt 25 277 38 807 100 79 60 Excellent 92 1807 S 159th St 51st Ave S 53rd Ave S Local Asphalt 25 721 100 2,103 76 60 80 V Good 70 1907 S 160th St 42nd Ave S 43rd Ave S Collector Asphalt 29 348 56 1,178 69 53 60 Good 63 1476 S 160th St 43rd Ave S 46th Ave S Collector Asphalt 29 1,029 166 3,482 63 74 60 Good 66 1909 S 160th St 51st Ave S Slade Way Collector Asphalt 28 802 125 2,620 65 74 60 Good 67 1468 S 160th St 48th Ave S 51st Ave S Collector Asphalt 28 689 107 2,251 71 66 60 Good 68 1469 S 160th St 46th Ave S 47th Ave S Collector Asphalt 29 302 49 1,023 70 69 60 Good 69 1908 S 160th St 47th Ave S 48th Ave S Collector Asphalt 28 300 47 979 73 64 60 V Good 69 1545 S 161st St S 161st St DS@78W S 161st St Local Asphalt 24 78 10 219 69 15 80 Fair 50 1797 S 161st St DS@78W S 161st St S 161st St Local Asphalt 24 79 11 221 82 22 80 Good 61 1798 S 161st St WEST END 51st Ave S Local Asphalt 24 364 49 1,020 84 70 60 V Good 79 1219 S 162nd St 48th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 25 301 42 879 29 14 60 V Poor 23 1220 S 162nd St 46th Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 24 125 17 350 64 11 80 Marginal 45 1261 S 163rd PI S 163rd PI S 163rd PI Local Asphalt 26 139 20 421 34 0 80 V Poor 22 1263 S 163rd PI 51st Ave S EAST END Local Asphalt 26 483 70 1,465 41 41 60 Marginal 40 1262 S 163rd PI 45th PI S 46th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 140 19 409 79 25 80 Good 60 1264 S 163rd PI 45th Ave S 45th PI S Local Asphalt 25 142 20 413 72 63 60 Good 68 1493 S 164th St 48th PI S 49th Ave S Collector Asphalt 32 202 36 756 47 60 30 Fair 50 1492 S 1641h St 51st Ave S 52nd Ave S Local Asphalt 25 545 76 1,590 63 45 60 Fair 56 1490 S 164th St 42nd Ave S 47th Ave S Collector Asphalt 31 1,551 267 5,609 60 68 30 Good 62 1491 S 1641h St 49th Ave S 51st Ave S Collector Asphalt 32 379 67 1,413 75 58 60 Good 69 1404 S 1641h St 47th Ave S 47th PI S Collector Asphalt 31 121 21 436 85 57 60 V Good 75 1489 S 1641h St 47th PI S 48th PI S Collector Asphalt 31 389 67 1,406 84 69 60 V Good 79 1565 S 166th St 53rd Ave S 54th Ave S Local Asphalt 26 270 39 820 56 51 60 Fair 54 2155 S 166th St S 166th St 51st Ave S Collector Asphalt 35 152 30 622 44 79 30 Fair 54 1215 S 1661h St CITY LIMIT 53rd Ave S Local Asphalt 25 190 26 554 64 54 60 Good 60 1910 S 168th St WEST END Southcenter Pkwy Local Asphalt 27 276 41 869 26 3 80 V Poor 18 1003 S 1681h St Southcenter Pkwy DS@359E Southcenter Pkwy Local Asphalt 25 359 50 1,047 81 66 60 V Good 76 1101 S 180th St West Valley Hwy S 180th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 45 1,234 308 6,478 42 55 60 Marginal 45 1723 S 180th St Andover Park W Andover Park E Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 918 229 4,818 44 62 60 Fair 49 1223 S 180th St Andover Park E Sperry Dr Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 881 220 4,624 46 63 60 Fair 51 1222 S 180th St Sperry Dr West Valley Hwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 528 132 2,775 55 60 60 Fair 56 1100 S 180th St Southcenter Pkwy Andover Park W Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 1,434 358 7,526 68 69 60 Good 67 1465 S 184th PI 54th PI S Southcenter Pkwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 2,072 518 10,880 75 71 60 V Good 73 1097 S 200th St 46th Ave S Southcenter Pkwy Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,315 409 8,593 95 81 60 Excellent 89 1888 S 200th St Orillia Rd S 46th Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 247 77 1,617 99 75 60 Excellent 90 1454 S 2001h St Southcenter Pkwy CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,439 448 9,399 93 91 60 Excellent 91 1120 S 2041h St Orillia Rd S Frager Rd Local Asphalt 25 3,339 464 9,737 20 57 60 Poor 31 1494 S Glacier St WEST END Olympic Ave S Local Asphalt 27 250 38 788 86 66 60 V Good 79 1405 S Glacier St Olympic Ave S Cascade Ave S Local Asphalt 26 609 88 1,848 78 87 60 V Good 81 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 92 page 16 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a Pavement Area Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 1707 S Norfolk St East Marginal Way S CITY LIMIT Local Asphalt 25 737 102 2,150 64 78 60 Good 68 1420 S Ryan St Beacon Ave S 51st Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 349 87 1,832 30 67 60 Marginal 41 1377 S Ryan Way 47th Ave S S 107th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 227 57 1,189 15 56 60 Poor 28 1826 S Ryan Way S 107th St Beacon Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 1,126 281 5,910 13 60 60 Poor 28 1827 S Ryan Way Martin L King Jr Way S 47th Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 978 244 5,132 21 54 60 Poor 31 1394 S Wallace St NW END CITY LIMIT Local Asphalt 26 328 47 996 54 31 80 Marginal 45 1621 Slade Way 53rd PI S 54th Ave S Local Asphalt 25 314 44 915 54 59 60 Fair 55 1622 Slade Way S 160th St 53rd PI S Local Asphalt 26 837 121 2,539 65 54 80 Good 61 1168 Southcenter Blvd 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 44 566 138 2,906 44 58 60 Marginal 48 1342 Southcenter Blvd 38th Ln S 40th Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 42 432 101 2,118 52 57 60 Fair 53 1413 Southcenter Blvd 40th Ave S 40th Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 42 145 34 711 54 64 60 Fair 56 1340 Southcenter Blvd 42nd Ave S 51st Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 44 2,694 658 13,828 62 72 30 Good 64 1818 Southcenter Blvd International Blvd 38th Ln S Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 838 210 4,402 70 66 60 Good 68 2043 Southcenter Blvd 53rd Ave S 1-5 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 171 43 898 69 67 60 Good 68 1507 Southcenter Blvd Interurban Ave S Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 25 261 36 761 72 62 60 Good 68 2031 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Ramp 1-405 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 40 362 80 1,688 68 73 60 Good 69 1348 Southcenter Blvd 1-405 Ramp 1-405 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 45 452 113 2,374 71 71 60 V Good 70 1337 Southcenter Blvd 52nd Ave S 53rd Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 301 75 1,582 75 63 60 V Good 70 1820 Southcenter Blvd 62nd Ave S 65th Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 1,142 279 5,860 70 78 30 V Good 72 2025 Southcenter Blvd 51st Ave S 52nd Ave S Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 371 93 1,948 76 71 60 V Good 74 1416 Southcenter Blvd 61st Ave S 62nd Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 469 115 2,406 81 65 60 V Good 75 2039 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Fwy 1-5 Fwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 41 99 23 474 71 88 60 V Good 76 1629 Southcenter Blvd 65th Ave S 66th Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 587 144 3,015 78 77 60 V Good 77 2042 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Fwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 69 17 360 81 78 60 V Good 79 2033 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Fwy 1-5 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 39 29 6 131 83 77 60 V Good 81 2035 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Fwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 41 76 17 365 86 75 60 V Good 82 1686 Southcenter Blvd 66th Ave S 1-405 Ramp Local Asphalt 25 649 90 1,894 87 74 60 V Good 82 2037 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Fwy 1-5 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 41 68 16 326 83 86 60 V Good 84 1347 Southcenter Blvd 1-405 Ramp DS@398E 1-405 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 45 398 99 2,088 90 77 60 Excellent 85 1821 Southcenter Blvd DS@398E 1-405 Ramp 61st Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 44 779 190 3,999 90 81 60 Excellent 86 1554 Southcenter Blvd 1-405 Ramp Interurban Ave S Local Asphalt 27 77 12 242 92 85 60 Excellent 89 2041 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Fwy 1-5 Fwy Minor Arterial Asphalt 56 38 12 248 90 93 60 Excellent 90 1415 Southcenter Blvd 1-405 Ramp 1-405 Ramp Local Asphalt 26 60 9 183 98 86 60 Excellent 93 1685 Southcenter Blvd 1-5 Ramp Southcenter Blvd Principal Arterial Asphalt 45 300 75 1,575 100 83 60 Excellent 93 1691 Southcenter Pkwy Wig Blvd Minkler Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 599 150 3,146 48 62 60 Fair 52 1464 Southcenter Pkwy S 168th St S 168th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 64 16 337 49 62 60 Fair 52 1774 Southcenter Pkwy S 168th St Wig Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 666 167 3,497 53 72 60 Fair 59 1776 Southcenter Pkwy 1-5 Ramp Strander Blvd Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 218 54 1,144 61 61 60 Good 60 1775 Southcenter Pkwy Strander Blvd S 168th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 1,313 328 6,894 69 61 60 Good 66 1767 Southcenter Pkwy 1-5 Ramp 1-5 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 162 41 851 77 63 80 V Good 72 2063 Southcenter Pkwy Minkler Blvd S 180th St Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 2,716 679 14,257 72 74 60 V Good 72 1769 Southcenter Pkwy Southcenter Mall 1-5 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 622 156 3,267 73 82 60 V Good 75 1467 Southcenter Pkwy S 180th St A Line Minor Arterial Asphalt 45 900 225 4,728 85 78 60 V Good 82 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 93 page 17 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name GISID On Street From Street To Street E FunCL Pavetype rn a •o Pavement Area 1768 Southcenter Pkwy 1352 Southcenter Pkwy 1770 Southcenter Pkwy 1693 Southcenter Pkwy 1472 Southcenter Pkwy 1778 Southcenter Pkwy 1773 Southcenter Pkwy 1343 Southcenter Pkwy 1695 Southcenter Pkwy 1764 Southcenter Pkwy 1704 Starfire Way 1705 Starfire Way 1302 Strander Blvd 1304 Strander Blvd 1305 Strander Blvd 1306 Strander Blvd 1303 Strander Blvd 1307 Strander Blvd 1551 SW Grady Way 1346 SW Grady Way 1819 SW Grady Way 1291 Todd Blvd 1290 Todd Blvd 1845 Treck Dr 1384 Treck Dr 1129 Triland Dr 1104 Tukwila International Blvd 2002 Tukwila International Blvd 1082 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1075 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1077 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1073 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1081 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1885 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1080 Tukwila Intl Blvd 2123 Tukwila Intl Blvd 2124 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1715 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1884 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1437 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1078 Tukwila Intl Blvd 2126 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1886 Tukwila Intl Blvd Klickitat Dr UnNamed-01545 1-5 Ramp Segale Park C Dr A Line S 19400 Block S 19000 Block UnNamed-01543 B Line C Line Starfire Way DS@1178E Starfire Way West Valley Hwy Christensen Rd Andover Park W Andover Park E Southcenter Pkwy 61st PI S Interurban Ave S Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way Cascade Ave S Olympic Ave S Treck Dr WEST END WEST END SR 99 Ramp Tukwila Intl Blvd DS@172S Boeing Access Rd DS@608S East Marginal Way S SR 99 Ramp S 112th St Tukwila Intl Blvd S 144th St S116thWay DS@36W Boeing Access Rd DS@91S East Marginal Way S SR 599 S 146th St S 150th St SR 599 Ramp East Marginal Way S S 142nd St 1-5 Ramp S 200th St Klickitat Dr B Line Segale Park C Dr UnNamed-01543 S 19400 Block UnNamed-01545 C Line S 19000 Block DS@1178E Starfire Way Fort Dent Way EAST END West Valley Hwy Andover Park E Christensen Rd 61stPIS Andover Park W Interurban Ave S Fun Center Way CITY LIMIT West Valley Hwy S Cascade Ave S Treck Dr Andover Park E Andover Park W Tukwila Intl Blvd S 132nd St DS@608S Boeing Access Rd S 112th St SR 99 SR 99 Ramp East Marginal Way S S 146th St SR 99 DS@172S Boeing Access Rd DS@509S East Marginal Way S S 116th Way S 148th St S 152nd St SR 99 Ramp DS@91S East Marginal Way S S 144th St Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Local Local Local Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Local Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Local Local Local Local Local Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Local Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Local Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Concrete Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 25 27 26 48 48 48 47 47 27 45 32 25 32 27 25 27 56 56 25 44 56 56 56 56 56 32 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 361 752 383 977 613 1,150 1,030 540 650 770 1,178 1,353 239 847 1,077 771 1,350 662 154 117 1,024 353 642 204 543 1,174 2,111 302 436 1,027 230 1,193 144 699 634 136 418 121 699 704 196 91 679 90 188 96 244 153 287 257 135 163 192 164 203 34 226 287 206 353 173 23 29 182 49 114 31 75 176 657 94 61 251 72 371 45 218 197 24 130 38 217 219 61 28 211 1,894 3,945 2,012 5,130 3,217 6,037 5,407 2,835 3,413 4,042 3,437 4,262 724 4,744 6,031 4,319 7,404 3,630 485 612 3,823 1,028 2,398 642 1,584 3,698 13,794 1,973 1,272 5,271 1,502 7,794 942 4,569 4,143 507 2,734 790 4,567 4,600 1,281 592 4,434 Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) 81 87 91 88 87 92 91 92 93 93 23 86 9 44 45 50 58 65 48 66 100 71 71 30 65 29 77 88 34 43 51 46 67 52 55 71 59 65 68 70 69 79 69 91 81 79 88 92 86 90 89 88 91 58 55 29 54 62 63 62 65 52 59 73 71 74 64 73 63 88 86 60 73 63 75 47 79 81 49 80 77 73 71 75 58 81 V Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Poor V Good V Poor Marginal Fair Fair Fair Good Marginal Good Excellent V Good V Good Marginal Good Poor V Good Excellent Marginal Fair Fair Fair Good Good Good Good Good Good Good V Good V Good V Good V Good 84 85 86 88 88 89 90 90 91 91 34 76 15 46 49 53 58 64 48 62 91 71 71 40 67 39 80 86 42 51 54 55 59 60 62 63 65 68 69 69 70 72 72 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 94 page 18 of 19 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Condition Summary - Sorted by Street Name E GISID On Street From Street To Street FunCL Pavetype rn a Pavement Area 1079 Tukwila Intl Blvd 2125 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1439 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1084 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1083 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1105 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1074 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1438 Tukwila Intl Blvd 2003 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1887 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1672 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1076 Tukwila Intl Blvd 2010 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1429 Tukwila Intl Blvd 2009 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1055 Tukwila Pkwy 1056 Tukwila Pkwy 2133 Tukwila Pkwy 1053 Tukwila Pkwy 1054 Tukwila Pkwy 1746 Upland Dr 1518 West Marginal PI S 1550 West Valley Hwy 1292 West Valley Hwy 1295 West Valley Hwy 1293 West Valley Hwy 1294 West Valley Hwy 1498 West Valley Hwy S 1665 Wig Blvd SR 99 Ramp East Marginal Way S S 148th St DS@193S East Marginal Way S DS@509S East Marginal Way S S 141st St East Marginal Way S S 139th St S 130th St S 140th St S 141st St SR 99 S 132nd St SR 99 37th Ave S 61 st Ave S 1-405 Ramp Andover Park E Andover Park W Southcenter Mall WEST END CITY LIMIT Longacres Way Interurban Ave S 1-405 Ramp Strander Blvd S 180th St Todd Blvd Southcenter Pkwy Condition Summary Surface Distress Index (SDI) Roughness Index (RI) Condition Rating Current Segment PCI (CPC!) SR 599 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 107 33 696 74 71 60 V Good 72 DS@36W Boeing Access Rd Local Asphalt 24 36 5 101 87 45 80 V Good 72 S 150th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 700 218 4,571 73 76 60 V Good 74 Tukwila Intl Blvd Local Asphalt 32 209 37 781 80 68 60 V Good 75 Tukwila Intl Blvd Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 146 45 955 76 78 60 V Good 76 S 141 st St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 127 39 829 76 79 60 V Good 76 DS@193S East Marginal Way S Local Asphalt 22 193 24 496 87 61 60 V Good 78 S 140th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 340 106 2,223 77 82 60 V Good 78 35th Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 346 107 2,257 82 72 60 V Good 78 S 141st St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 238 74 1,553 76 87 60 V Good 79 S 142nd St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 344 107 2,247 76 86 60 V Good 79 SR 599 Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 192 60 1,255 78 86 60 V Good 80 37th Ave S Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 604 188 3,947 84 79 60 V Good 82 SR 99 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,468 457 9,590 78 92 60 V Good 82 S 139th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 2,015 627 13,167 83 87 60 V Good 83 1-405 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 65 506 183 3,835 81 78 60 V Good 79 Andover Park W Minor Arterial Asphalt 66 574 210 4,418 85 75 60 V Good 81 1-405 Ramp Minor Arterial Asphalt 67 458 171 3,582 91 63 60 V Good 81 Andover Park E Minor Arterial Asphalt 68 1,088 411 8,632 88 76 60 V Good 83 61stAve S Minor Arterial Asphalt 70 1,193 464 9,740 90 82 60 Excellent 87 Andover Park W Local Asphalt 20 919 102 2,144 81 80 60 V Good 80 S 102nd St Local Asphalt 21 2,203 257 5,397 8 63 30 Poor 25 Strander Blvd Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 1,529 476 9,991 67 74 30 Good 68 1-405 Ramp Principal Arterial Asphalt 55 556 170 3,567 70 75 60 V Good 71 Longacres Way Principal Arterial Asphalt 56 594 185 3,884 80 75 30 V Good 78 S 180th St Principal Arterial Asphalt 58 5,933 1,912 40,149 75 86 30 V Good 78 Todd Blvd Principal Arterial Asphalt 60 2,082 694 14,573 83 81 60 V Good 81 CITY LIMIT Principal Arterial Asphalt 59 975 319 6,708 74 79 60 V Good 75 Bauch Dr Local Asphalt 22 1,325 162 3,401 73 62 60 Good 69 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix A 95 page 19 of 19 Appendix B Rehabilitation Plan 96 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Five Year Rehabilitation Plan By Year $1400k/Year Rehabilitation Plan (0 K LL 0 GISID On Street From Street To Street Rehab Activity CC Segment Pavement Cost ($) Segment Total Cost ($) O V O a` 5 Year Post Rehab PCI 1832 47th Ave S 1568 57th Ave S 1403 57th Ave S 1651 Airport Way S 1341 Frager Rd 1593 Midland Dr 1799 S 109th St 1520 S 133rd St 1642 S 133rd St 1637 S 137th St 1959 S 138th St 1739 S 142nd St 1138 S 143rd St 1827 S Ryan Way 1377 S Ryan Way 1826 S Ryan Way 2125 Tukwila Intl Blvd 1233 35th Ave S 1308 38th Ave S 1179 42nd Ave S 1217 45th PI S 1231 45th PI S 1448 48th Ave S 1566 57th Ave S 1118 S 107th St 2100 S 116th St 2001 S 133rd St 2084 S 136th St 2083 S 136th St 1587 S 141 st St 2073 S 144th St 1194 S 144th St 1190 S 144th St 1942 S 146th St 1801 S 146th St 1803 S 146th St 1802 S 146th St 1120 S 204th St 2008 37th Ave S S Ryan Way S 141 st St S 144th St DS@581E Boeing Access Rd S 204th St WEST END Beacon Ave S 34th Ave S 35th Ave S 53rd Ave S Macadam Rd S WEST END Interurban Ave S Martin L King Jr Way S 47th Ave S S 107th St East Marginal Way S S 146th St S 130th St S 126th St 45th PI S DS@65S 45th PI S S 162nd St S 150th PI S Ryan Way East Marginal Way S 57th Ave S WEST END 52nd PI S Tukwila Intl Blvd 44th Ln S 46th Ave S 48th Ave S Tukwila Intl Blvd 41 st Ave S 46th Ave S 48th PI S Orillia Rd S Tukwila Intl Blvd S 109th St S 142nd St S 147th St Boeing Access Rd S 204th St Andover Park W Beacon Ave S 35th Ave S EAST END 56th Ave S NE END 52nd Ave S EAST END 47th Ave S S 107th St Beacon Ave S DS@36W Boeing Access Rd SOUTH END SOUTH END SE END DS@65S 45th PI S 45th PI S SOUTH END SOUTH END EAST END 35th Ln S 57th Ave S 52nd PI S 52nd Ave S 42nd Ave S 46th Ave S 48th Ave S Macadam Rd S 41 st Ave S 42nd Ave S 48th PI S EAST END Frager Rd S 135th St 28 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 41 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 29 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 27 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 50 1 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0) + Strctrl Ptch 28 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 48 1 EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 39 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 41 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 61 1 Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0) 26 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 72 1 MicroSurface / Chip Seal 25 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 31 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 28 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 28 1 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 72 1 MicroSurface / Chip Seal 43 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 44 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 72 2 MicroSurface / Chip Seal 62 2 MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch 63 2 MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch 30 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 43 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 31 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 63 2 MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch 83 2 Slurry Seal / Seal Coat 41 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 43 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 43 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 42 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 42 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 47 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 41 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 53 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 42 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 49 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 31 2 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 48 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 47.50 78,328 78,328 78,328 89 43.50 35,627 35,627 35,627 89 47.50 124,308 124,308 124,308 89 52.50 125,580 125,580 125,580 88 29.27 322 322 322 87 47.50 109,773 109,773 109,773 89 37.67 113 113 113 88 43.50 34,496 34,496 63,728 89 43.50 29,232 29,232 63,728 89 25.00 17,625 17,625 17,625 87 47.50 40,185 40,185 40,185 89 7.50 1,935 1,935 1,935 83 47.50 159,458 159,458 159,458 89 52.50 269,430 269,430 642,128 88 52.50 62,423 62,423 642,128 88 52.50 310,275 310,275 642,128 88 7.50 758 758 758 84 44.80 46,104 46,104 46,104 91 46.86 72,500 72,500 72,500 90 7.73 3,693 3,693 3,693 84 9.27 1,835 1,835 3,448 85 9.27 1,613 1,613 3,448 85 48.93 17,907 17,907 17,907 91 44.81 27,869 27,869 27,869 91 48.92 34,492 34,492 34,492 91 9.27 4,644 4,644 4,644 85 5.24 173 173 173 84 44.81 11,739 11,739 53,273 91 44.80 41,534 41,534 53,273 91 44.80 73,883 73,883 73,883 91 48.93 90,169 90,169 306,564 90 48.92 108,124 108,124 306,564 90 48.92 108,271 108,271 306,564 90 44.80 86,115 86,115 131,502 91 44.80 45,387 45,387 131,502 91 44.80 103,589 103,589 146,512 91 44.80 42,923 42,923 146,512 91 48.93 476,383 476,383 476,383 91 46.15 87,776 87,776 87,776 92 IMS Infrastructure Management Services Appendix B 97 Page lof 3 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Five Year Rehabilitation Plan By Year $1400k/Year Rehabilitation Plan (0 K LL 0 GISID On Street From Street To Street Rehab Activity CC Segment Pavement Cost ($) Segment Total Cost ($) O V O a` 5 Year Post Rehab PCI 1383 47th Ave S 1386 50th PI S 1146 50th PI S 1113 53rd Ave S 1571 57th Ave S 1004 62nd Ave S 1640 Airport Way S 1364 Fun Center Way 1744 S 142nd St 1345 S 149th St 1718 S 152nd St 1723 S 180th St 1704 Starfire Way 1551 SW Grady Way 1208 34th Ave S 1205 34th Ave S 1236 35th Ave S 1064 37th Ave S 1379 40th Ave S 1362 59th Aly S 1630 Beacon Ave S 1975 Boeing Access Rd 1772 C Line 1176 Christensen Rd 1577 Corporate Dr S 1249 Corporate Dr S 1378 Nelsen PI 1284 S 112th St 1444 S 114th St 2098 S 118th St 1595 S 130th PI 1185 S 131st PI 1243 S 144th St 1188 S 144th St 1493 S 164th St 1582 33rd PIS 1385 47th Ave S 1846 47th Ave S 1051 48th PI S NE END S 124th St S 125th St S 170th St S 152nd St S 151 st St Boeing Access Rd DS@447E Interurban Ave S 52nd Ave S DS@480E NW END International Blvd Andover Park W Starfire Way Interurban Ave S S 130th St S 144th St S 133rd St S 128th St S 152nd St S 147th St CITY LIMIT Martin L King Jr Ramp UnNamed-01534 Strander Blvd Corporate Dr S WEST END S 156th St 50th Ave S 40th Ave S 44th Ave S 57th Ave S 44th Ave S 58th Ave S 59th Ave S 48th PI S NW END S 104th PI S 160th St 48th Ave S S 134th PI S 125th St S 130th PI S 172nd Ln S 152nd PI DS@131S S 151 st St Airport Way S SW Grady Way 53rd Ave S Interurban Ave S 37th PI S Andover Park E DS@1178E Starfire Way Interurban Ave S S 132nd St Military Rd S S 135th St S 130th St Southcenter Blvd SOUTH END S Ryan Way Martin L King Jr Way S Southcenter Pkwy Christensen Rd Corporate Dr S Andover Park W Longacres Way 51stAve S 41 st Ave S 44th PI S SE END 44th Ave S 59th Ave S EAST END 49th Ave S S 130th St S 107th St S 162nd St S 136th St 32 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 47 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 34 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 47 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 48 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 16 3 ACP Full Depth Reconstruction 33 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 33 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 47 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 34 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 33 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 49 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 34 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 48 3 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 50 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 49 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 36 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 36 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 35 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 35 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 65 4 MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch 36 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 33 4 Surf Recon + Base Rehab / FWM + Strctrl Ptch + Olay 50 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 38 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 56 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 35 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 48 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 35 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 86 4 Slurry Seal / Seal Coat 50 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 49 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 56 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 36 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 50 4 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 52 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 38 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 51 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 76 5 MicroSurface / Chip Seal 50.39 42,884 42,884 42,884 92 48.27 50,733 50,733 50,733 92 53.05 211,597 211,597 211,597 92 46.15 102,220 102,220 102,220 92 46.15 39,642 39,642 39,642 92 111.39 33,975 33,975 33,975 95 55.70 129,997 129,997 129,997 91 50.39 13,153 13,153 13,153 92 46.15 38,073 38,073 38,073 92 50.39 101,037 101,037 101,037 92 50.39 109,655 109,655 109,655 92 50.39 242,792 242,792 242,792 91 50.39 173,200 173,200 173,200 92 46.15 22,382 22,382 22,382 92 47.53 96,018 96,018 96,018 94 47.53 70,968 70,968 70,968 94 51.90 128,464 128,464 128,464 94 51.90 82,788 82,788 82,788 94 51.90 91,819 91,819 91,819 94 51.90 74,016 74,016 74,016 94 9.84 1,377 1,377 1,377 87 60.10 90,030 90,030 90,030 93 78.68 133,986 133,986 133,986 95 47.53 84,467 84,467 84,467 94 47.53 22,531 22,531 69,922 94 47.53 47,391 47,391 69,922 94 51.90 82,995 82,995 82,995 94 47.53 32,608 32,608 32,608 94 51.90 29,170 29,170 29,170 94 5.57 1,226 1,226 1,226 84 47.53 180,390 180,390 180,390 94 47.53 14,783 14,783 14,783 94 47.53 62,839 62,839 95,495 94 47.53 32,656 32,656 95,495 94 51.90 39,240 39,240 39,240 94 48.96 37,209 37,209 37,209 96 53.46 102,005 102,005 102,005 96 48.96 86,854 86,854 86,854 96 8.44 5,445 5,445 5,445 88 IMS Infrastructure Management Services Appendix B 98 Page 2of 3 City of Tukwila, WA Street Inventory and Five Year Rehabilitation Plan By Year $1400k/Year Rehabilitation Plan GISID On Street From Street To Street s LL 0 Rehab Activity O! CC Segment Pavement Cost ($) Segment Total Cost ($) 5 Year Post Rehab PCI 1684 1411 1423 2092 1868 1866 1158 1940 1127 1743 1108 1223 1222 1342 1413 1168 53rd PI S 56th Ave S East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S East Marginal Way S S 109th St S 139th St S 142nd St S 152nd St S 180th St S 180th St Southcenter Blvd Southcenter Blvd Southcenter Blvd 53rd PI S SPUR S 139th St Tukwila Intl Blvd Interurban Ave S S 128th St S 128th St S 130th St 50th Ave S 53rd Ave S 42nd Ave S 40th Ave S Andover Park E Sperry Dr 38th Ln S 40th Ave S 40th Ave S 53rd PI S SPUR S 141st St Boeing Access Rd SR 599 S 128th St S 130th St 40th Ave S Beacon Ave S 55th Ave S 43rd Ave S 42nd Ave S Sperry Dr West Valley Hwy 40th Ave S 40th Ave S 42nd Ave S 37 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 51 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 55 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 38 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 48 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 54 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 58 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 50 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 37 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch 51 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 69 5 MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch 51 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 56 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 53 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 56 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 48 5 FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) 53.46 10,692 10,692 10,692 96 48.96 81,371 81,371 81,371 96 56.28 15,082 15,082 15,082 96 59.09 64,407 64,407 64,407 96 53.46 31,863 31,863 150,120 96 53.46 97,086 97,086 150,120 96 53.46 21,171 21,171 150,120 96 48.96 27,222 27,222 27,222 96 53.46 60,626 60,626 60,626 96 48.96 47,246 47,246 47,246 96 10.13 9,309 9,309 9,309 88 53.46 247,207 247,207 395,563 96 53.46 148,356 148,356 395,563 96 53.46 113,232 113,232 306,603 96 53.46 38,011 38,011 306,603 96 53.46 155,360 155,360 306,603 96 IMS Infrastructure Manage,nent Services Appendix B 99 Page 3of 3 Appendix FuU'SizeK4aps 100 NP RR Community Center Newholly 'ark rail Site Shorewood Elementary School Shorewood Park Seola Beach Eagle Landing Park Shorewood - Burien Seahurst Park Seahurst Gregory Heights Salmon Creek Ravine Inglesea Gregory Heights Elementary School Lake Burien Steve Cox Memorial Park White Center Heights Elementary School Lakewood Park Mount View Saint Bernadette Parish School Chelsea Park Burien Burien City Center Evergreen High School Salmon Creek Elementary School Linde Hill Park Highline Medical Center -Main Campus Functional Class Local Collector Minor Arterial Principal Arterial Marvista Elementary School Hazel Valley Elementary School Sunnydale 509 White Center Beverly Park Arbor Lake Park Evansville John F. Kennedy High School Highline High School Five Corners Highline Sunnydale Elementary Airport Park Manhattan Park & Playfield 509 Southminster Presbyterian 5091 p,p Glendale Boulevard Beverly Park Park -Glendale Elementary School Glen Acres Golf & Country Club Boulevard Park Southern Heights Elementary School Pac West Little League Lake Reba King County Irate rnati anal Airport c 0 South Beacon 3 Hill Van Asselt Wing Luke Rainier Golf & Country Club Southern Heights North SeaTac Park Ryan Field Seattle -Tacoma International Airport Latona - SeaTac Riverton Heights 0 09 Cecil Moses Memorial Park Cascade Behavioral Hospital 29 1153 9572 170 Riverton Heights Park 8 Washington Memorial Park and Cemetery 99 SeaTac/Airport rids Seffrel SeaTac Bow Lake Angle Lake Park East Duwamish Greenbelt 754 Pl 1457 Boeing 73 gccess ftd 1750 Allentown-Duwamish 5 116th 5 1987 S 120th PI s 13sth St 1702 1899 S 136th 1.634 S 137th St 18 Riverton Crest Cemetery 600 1602 5 140th St 1485 143 S 142nd PI 1089 2016 2015 1359 1818 Tukwila International Boulevard r""' (4} Military, Rd S Angle Lake Duwamish H'S Preserve 05 5 117th St 1417 S 124th S h St 1039 2 512655S1 1643 1a66 1604 1484 S 141st St 5589 S 142nd St 1742 30th St 142 1893 5131si P uthgate Park 1374 S 150th St 1376 1718 5152nd St 1719 1347 16511 1522 1646 1556 S McVan-McMicken Heights Dunlap East Duwamish Greenbelt s Tukwila Community Center ipg6 1676 (055 8 1850 1173 1849 1126 1486 1599 1605 N Foster High School S 144th St 2074 S 146th St 1350, 151stSt 5 2071 2070 1349 orn•y Elementary School 2023 S 156th St 2022 1476 S 160th St 1469 Crestview Park - Tukwila 1490 S 162nd 26 uth Shore Rainier Beach S Ryan St 18 1278 S 107th S6 S 109th 5t 2128 284 988 1553 1336 1310 S 125th St Southcenter Blvd Crystal Sprin Park 1908 1468 S 164th St 1404 1489 149 Bow Lake Elementary Seattle School Christian School --nValley Ridge "- Park 888 1097- - 5 200th St Codiga F Park SFD 33 Kubota Gardens Natural Area s Pritchard Island Beach Beer Sheva Park Boat Launch Rainier Beach Rainier View Elementary School Foster Golf Links S 1128 S 139th St 1127 1122 1739 1744 2079 2076 1189 1245 1244 1679 1337 2043 2039 20 S159th51187 66th 5t 65 2031 8j, Rive,. :ry Chinook Beach Park '0'00" Emerson Rainier View 1243 w 1188 1758 1251 1252 1756 1717 17 910 [900 1506 S 149th 5 Tukwila Elementary School Southcenter Mall 1665 Wig Blvd 1355 Minkler Blvd Parkway upercenter Briscoe Park Campbell Hill Elementary School 5t 1298 1300 1584 S 153rd St 1585 Ikawa Park r900 A 0 For De +t Park ukwila Park Tukwila Pkwy 1056 1053 Corpora Dr N 1746 Upland Dr 1593 Midland Dr 1129 inland Dr .. 1100 149 Evans Black D 1042 Baker Blvd 1102 Strander Blvd 1305 1g47 co Treck Dr 1384 Glacier St 1405 Riverside Dr Lakeridoe Park enni rk 9001 97 302 1101 Skyway Park n Skyway Black River Forest Waterworks Gardens Tukwila Station Amtrak ngton Northern Railroad Springbrook Greenbelt Black River Alternative High School 595 508 Bryn Bryn M6 p M 509 Resurrection Lutheran Church No{tjh Hill Esp - - North Hill 0.25 0.5 1 Miles SCORE Des Moines Creek Park Madrona Elementary School 1120 S 204th St 0 0 to 0 51 a 0 v 0- IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2024 Tukwila WAS Pavement AnalysislM ps 2024 NP RR Community Center Newholly 0 Sark rail Site Shorewood Elementary School Shorewood Park Seola Beach Eagle Landing Park Shorewood - Burien Seahurst Park Seahurst Gregory Heights Salmon Creek Ravine Inglesea Gregory Heights Elementary School Lake Burien Steve Cox Memorial Park White Center Heights Elementary School Lakewood Park Mount View Saint Bernadette Parish School Chelsea Park Burien Burien City Center Evergreen High School Salmon Creek Elementary School Linde Hill Park Current PCI (1-25) Very Poor (26-40) Poor (41-50) Marginal (51-60) Fair (61-70) Good (71-85) Very Good (86-100) Excellent Nature Trails Park Highline Medical Center -Main Campus Marvista Elementary School Hazel Valley Elementary School Sunnydale 509 White Center Beverly Park Arbor Lake Park Evansville John F. Kennedy High School Highline High School Five Corners Resurrection Lutheran Church Highline Sunnydale Elementary Airport Park 509 Manhattan Park & Playfield North Hill Southminster Presbyterian [509i p,p Glendale Boulevard „c,c, Beverly Park ,•`` Park -Glendale Elementary School Glen Acres Golf & Country Club Boulevard Park 518 Southern Heights Elementary School Pac West Little League Lake Reba Rainier Golf & Country Club Southern Heights North SeaTac Park Ryan Field Sea ttle-Tacorrla International Airport Des Moines Creek Park King County International Airport Latona - SeaTac Riverton Heights Cecil Moses Memorial Park Wing Luke Van Asselt South Beacon Hill East Duwamish Greenbelt 1978 1754 Boeing 973 Access Rd 1750 Allentown-Duwamish 1285 S 112th St 1786 310336 Cascade Behavioral Hospital 1529 1153 ll72 170 Riverton Heights Park 518 Washington Memorial Park and Cemetery 99 SeaTac/Airport "\ 99 SeaTac Bow Lake 99 Angle Lake Park Madrona Elementary School 600 Duwamish H08 13th51039 Preserve I493 1444 1442 36 IMMO 7057 1338 s 116 987 5 120th PI 7 S 124th St 5 126th St 1643 1906 9 19 th St 702 1899 5 136th St 1634 S 137th St 1830 Riverton Crest Cemetery 1602 5 140th St S 142nd P11099-,. 9Po 1677 148 48 279 0 1805 0510151186013303 1578 1359 81 Tukwila International Boulevard (le ) Military Rd S Angle Lake 80 17 1604 41st St L589 42nd St 1742 1369 S 115th St S 117th St 0320 1272 599� w5 83 S 130a 1587 ,y065 P' 1157 1755 893 5137st PI 743 75 900 5 122nd St Dunlap East Duwamish Greenbelt 8th 430 1435 1061 1671 Tukwila Community Center' 1126 1123 1605 50 Foster High School 144th St 2074 1801 S 146th St 1806 S 148th 5 1371 S 150th St 1376 1350 S 152nd St 1719 1342 1646 1556 S 158th St 1525 McVan-McMicken Heights 1273 nornoylre Elementary School 2023 S 156th 5t 2022 1476 6 168[h St 3310. Crestview Park - Tukwila 1490 5 162nd St 1220 5 ti` 1264 U 3P07300 2073 1 s 180 2071 2070 1449 _.. � 1358 a 1720 s 109th St 2128 1434 14 10 S12 uth Shore Rainier Beach S Ryan St 1278 S 107th St 1111.11111111111111111111111111 1190 5 145ths`St 1509 Southcenter Blvd Crystal Spri Park 1908 1468 S 164th St 1409 1489 0701311111111111111.101111116 Bow Lake Elementary Seattle School Christian School Valley Ridge Park 1097 S 200th St 284 5 a0ac Codiga Fa Park SFD 33 Kubota Gardens Natural Area Pritchard Island Beach Beer Sheva Park Boat Launch Rainier Beach Rainier View Elementary School Foster Golf Links s 28 5 139th St 1127 112 5 15914 SC 1807 S166th St 4 1215 039 20 1621 Rive. 1717 1716 2 9g 9 5 152nd PI 1910 1 11111111111111831 5 168th St 11111111101,11111111 6 Chinook Beach Park Emerson Rainier View ila Campbell Hill Elementary School 514 1243 w 0188 ■MMO St 6 5 149th St t a, 134 Tukwila Elementary School Southcenter Mall 1303 1655 Wig Blvd Parkway upercenter Briscoe Park Minkler Blvd 80000510153133 6 1584 5153rd St 758 lkawa Park [0001 O Park ukwila Park Tukwila Pkwy 1056 1053 1307 Corpora Dr N Corporate 249 Dr 2019 1746 Upland Dr idland Dr 129 Inland Dr Evans Black Dr 150 ker Blvd Strander Blvd1305 94 36 Treck Dr 1384 Costco Dr 100 1306 Indu Dr 1002 I.r.,r 452, S Glacier St 140 Riverside Lakeridge Park 1222 97 Longacres Way 137 02 1101 ,Skyvvay Park Paul and Pacific Milwaukee ago Milwaukee Skyway Black River Forest Waterworks Gardens Tukwila Station Amtjak 0 road Springbrook Greenbelt 0 ro sa- Black River Alternative High School Bryn Noah Hill Esp 0.25 0.5 Miles SCORE 0 331 IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2024 NP RR Community Center Newholly 0 'ark rail Site Shorewood Elementary School Shorewood Park Seola Beach Eagle Landing Park Steve Cox Memorial Park White Center Heights Elementary School Lakewood Park Evergreen High School Salmon Creek Elementary Shorewood - School Burien Seahurst Park Seahurst Gregory Heights Salmon Creek Ravine Inglesea Gregory Heights Elementary School Lake Burien Mount View Saint Bernadette Parish School Chelsea Park Burien Burien City Center Linde Hill Park Highline Medical Center -Main Campus Hazel Valley Elementary School Sunnydale —5641 White Center Beverly Park Arbor Lake Park Evansville John F. Kennedy High School Highline High School Five Corners sag 509 [5-6-91. Highline Sunnydale Elementary Glendale Boulevard Beverly Park Park -Glendale Elementary School Glen Acres Golf & Country Club Boulevard Park 518 Southern Heights Elementary School Pac West Little League Lake Reba Rainier Golf & Country Club Southern Heights North SeaTac Park Ryan Field King County tote rilati anal Airport Latona - SeaTac Riverton Heights Cecil Moses Memorial Park 99 Cascade Behavioral Hospital Riverton Heights Park 11-55 Year of First Rehab 1 Washington Merrrcarial Pcrk ry 3 4 5 Rehab Activity Slurry Seal / Seal Coat MicroSurface / Chip Seal; MicroSurface / Chip Seal + Strctrl Ptch Edge Mill + Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0) + Strctrl Ptch; Edge Mill Thin Overlay (1.5 - 2.0) EM/FWM + Moderate Overlay (2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0) + Strctrl Ptch; FWM + Thick Overlay (> 2.0 - 3.0 Surf Recon + Base Rehab / FWM + Strctrl Ptch + Olay ACP Full Depth Reconstruction e1ncnldiy School rt in eaTac Bow Lake }le Lake Park Resurrection Lutheran Church Noah Hill Esp - - North Hill 0.25 Southminster Presbyterian 0.5 1 Miles Des Moines Creek Park Madrona Elementary School Van Asselt Riverton Riverton Crest Cemetery Tukwila international Boulevard Wing Luke South Beacon Hill East Duwamish Greenbelt Allentown-Duwamish Angle Lake Duwamish Hill Preserve 9 99 5 114th 5t 1444 599 Sduthaate Park 180 1718 5 152n0 St McVan-McMicken Heights 42nd 5 Dunlap East Duwamish Greenbelt Boeing Access Rd 9001 900 s 118th St moo Tukwila Community Center Foster High School 20 Foster 10 1803 5 146th St 1802 uth Shore Thorndyke Elementary School Crestview Park Tukwila Bow Lake Elementary Seattle School Christian School -- —Valley Ridge Park 1120 S 204th 5t Rainier Beach 5 109th 5t 1940 Crystal Springs Park 1493 S 164th 5t S 112th St Codiga F Park 2 73 SFD 33 Kubota Gardens Nature1Area 388 S139th 5t 28hs Pritchard Island Beach Beer Sheva Park Boat Launch Chinook Beach Park r° Emerson Rainier Beach Rainier View Elementary School Foster Golf Links Rainier View 900 Tukwila 1188 Tukwila Elementary School Parkway Supercenter Briscoe Park Southcenter Mall tlland Dr 3193rt St `149th st 1345 Campbell Hill Elementary School F Tukwila Park Ikawa Park Corporate 299 Dr 5 Park Lakeridtse Park 900 SWGrady WaY1551 4111010. 181 181 Skyway Park 08 tri 0 wx to G 0 a c 0 85 0 00 80 a0) 3D 3 0 rQ ~0 c 88 00 ago Milwaukee Skyway Black River Forest Waterworks Gardens Tukwila Station Amtrak Springbrook Greenbelt Black River Alternative High School Bryn Bryn W. P M SCORE IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2024 Tukwila WAS Pavement Analysis103ps 2024 NP RR Community Center Newholly 'ark rail Site Shorewood Elementary School Shorewood Park Seola Beach Eagle Landing Park Shorewood - Burien Seahurst Park Seahurst Gregory Heights Salmon Creek Ravine Inglesea Gregory Heights Elementary School Lake Burien Steve Cox Memorial Park White Center Heights Elementary School Lakewood Park Mount View Saint Bernadette Parish School Chelsea Park Burien Burien City Center Evergreen High School Salmon Creek Elementary School Linde Hill Park Highline Medical Center -Main Campus Projected PC (26 - 40) Poor (40 - 50) Marginal (50 - 60) Fair (60 - 70) Good (85 - 100) Excellent Nature Trails . Park Marvista Elementary School Hazel Valley Elementary School Sunnydale Glendale Boulevard 509 Beverly Park Park -Glendale Elementary School White Center Beverly Park 509 Arbor Lake Park Evansville John F. Kennedy High School Highline High School Five Corners 509 509 sob Highline Sunnydale Elementary 509 Airport Park 509 Manhattan Park & Playfield [509 Southminster Presbyterian "S09 Glen Acres Golf & Country Club Boulevard Park 518 Southern Heights Elementary School Pac West Little League Lake Reba 03 3 0' 03 Rainier Golf & Country Club Southern Heights North SeaTac Park Ryan Field Seattle-Tacorna International Airport King County International Airport c n 3 03 Latona - SeaTac Riverton Heights Cecil Moses Memorial Park 1285 Cascade Behavioral Hospital 1703 Riverton Heights Park 518 Washington Memorial Park and Cemetery 99 SeaTac Bow Lake Angle Lake Park Wing Luke Van Asselt South Beacon Hill East Duwamish Greenbelt Boe 754 977 Allentown-Duwamish Riverton Crest Cemetery 99 1677 48 180 1818 Tukwila International Boulevard Militas Angle Lake 17 Preserve 057 5132nd Pi 34 16 McVan-McMicken Heights 442 70 1350, 90 55 Dunlap East Duwamish Greenbelt 75 Tukwila Community Center Foster High School Elementary School Crestview Park Bow Lake Elementary Seattle School Christian School - —Valley Ridge Park 00 Crystal Spring ";,' Park 1908 Rainier Beach S Ryan St 1111111111.10116 284 Codiga Park 200 4468 St SFD 33 Kubota Gardens 1521 29 Pritchard Island Beach Beer Sheva Park Boat Launch Rainier Beach Rainier View Elementary School Foster Golf Links 94 910 Chinook Beach Park Rainier View Tukwila Elementary School Southcenter Mall 1303 1965 Wig Blvd Parkway upercenter Briscoe Park 900 229, 1746 Upland Dr 1100 93 idland Dr 1307 1150 Campbell Hill Elementary School St Ikawa Park 1820 1661 ila Park Evans Black Dr 15 1042 Baker Blvd 1365 Tr k Dr 138 1357 Dr 1001 Riverside 102 Lakeridge Park 1302 Skyway Park Paul and Pacific 47. Skyway Black River Forest Waterworks Gardens Tukwila Station Amtrak Springbrook Greenbelt Black River Alternative High School Bryn Bryn 11/1. 509"" Resurrection Lutheran Church Noeh Hill Esp North Hill 0.25 0.5 Miles SCORE Des Moines Creek Park Madrona Elementary School Milwaukee IMS Infrastructure Management Services 2024